Bills

AB 2193: Hazing: educational institutions: prohibition and civil liability: reports and resources.

  • Session Year: 2023-2024
  • House: Assembly

Current Status:

Passed

(2024-09-27: Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 704, Statutes of 2024.)

Introduced

First Committee Review

First Chamber

Second Committee Review

Second Chamber

Enacted

Version:

Existing law makes it unlawful to engage in hazing, which is defined as a method of initiation or preinitiation into a student organization or student body, whether or not the organization or body is officially recognized by an educational institution, that is likely to cause serious bodily injury to a former, current, or prospective student of a school, community college, college, university, or other educational institution in the state. Existing law establishes civil liability for hazing participants or the organization if it is involved in the hazing.

This bill would expressly prohibit a person from being subjected to hazing in any program or activity conducted by an educational institution that receives, or benefits from, state financial assistance or enrolls students who receive state student financial aid. The bill would define an educational institution as a public or private institution of higher education in the state. The bill would, beginning January 1, 2026, additionally authorize a former, current, or prospective student, against whom hazing is directed and who has suffered injury as a result, to commence a civil action against an educational institution if (1) the institution has direct involvement in the hazing practice of the organization, or knew or should have known of the hazing practice and failed to take reasonable steps to prevent the hazing practice, (2) the organization involved in the hazing is affiliated with the educational institution at the time of the alleged hazing incident, and (3) the alleged hazing incident occurred on or after January 1, 2026. For purposes of determining whether an educational institution knew or should have known of the hazing practice and failed to take reasonable steps to prevent the hazing practice of the organization, the bill would establish a rebuttable presumption that an educational institution took reasonable steps to address hazing if the educational institution has specified antihazing measures. The bill would require the Trustees of the California State University, the Regents of the University of California, and certain independent institutions of higher education, on or before June 30, 2026, and annually thereafter, to report to the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature the number of hazing incidents that constituted a violation of the institutions policy prohibiting hazing and whether the violation was affiliated with a student organization, as specified.

This bill would also require the State Department of Education to make available on the departments internet website, on or before July 1, 2025, a model antihazing policy for local educational agencies and resources on hazing prevention for professional development purposes and to increase awareness among pupils, school staff, and community members of the dangers of hazing.

Discussed in Hearing

Assembly Floor54SEC
Aug 27, 2024

Assembly Floor

Senate Floor2MIN
Aug 26, 2024

Senate Floor

Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations1MIN
Aug 5, 2024

Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations

Senate Standing Committee on Education32MIN
Jul 3, 2024

Senate Standing Committee on Education

Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary24MIN
Jun 18, 2024

Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary

Assembly Floor3MIN
May 21, 2024

Assembly Floor

Assembly Standing Committee on Higher Education8MIN
Apr 23, 2024

Assembly Standing Committee on Higher Education

Assembly Standing Committee on Higher Education58SEC
Apr 23, 2024

Assembly Standing Committee on Higher Education

View Older Hearings

News Coverage:

AB 2193: Hazing: educational institutions: prohibition and civil liability: reports and resources. | Digital Democracy