Bills

AB 1157: Tenancy: just cause termination: rent increases.

  • Session Year: 2025-2026
  • House: Assembly

Current Status:

Failed

(2026-01-13: Coauthors revised.)

Introduced

First Committee Review

First Chamber

Second Committee Review

Second Chamber

Enacted

Version:

(1)Existing law prohibits the owner of a residential real property from terminating a tenancy without just cause, as defined, after a tenant has continuously and lawfully occupied a residential real property for 12 months. Among other residential real properties or residential circumstances, existing law exempts from these provisions a residential real property, including a mobilehome, that is alienable separate from the title to any other dwelling unit if the owner meets specified criteria and the tenants have been provided a specified written notice of the exemption. Existing law repeals these provisions on January 1, 2030.

This bill would revise these provisions by removing the exemption for separately alienable residential real property and, instead, only exempting a mobilehome if the above-described criteria are met. The bill would delete the January 1, 2030, repeal date, thereby extending these provisions indefinitely.

(2)Existing law prohibits an owner of residential real property, except as specified, from increasing over the course of any 12-month period the gross rental rate for a dwelling or a unit more than 5% plus the percentage change in the cost of living, or 10%, whichever is lower, of the lowest gross rental rate charged for that dwelling or unit at any time during the 12 months prior to the effective date of the increase, as specified.

This bill would reduce the permissible gross rental rate increase under these provisions to the lesser of 2% plus the percentage change in the cost of living, or 5%.

Among other residential real properties, existing law exempts from these provisions a residential real property that is alienable separate from the title to any other dwelling unit, including a mobilehome, if the owner meets specified criteria and the tenants have been provided a specified written notice of the exemption.

This bill would revise these provisions by removing the exemption for separately alienable residential real property and, instead, only exempting a mobilehome if the above-described criteria are met.

Existing law repeals these provisions on January 1, 2030.

This bill would delete the January 1, 2030, repeal date, thereby extending these provisions indefinitely.

(3)Notwithstanding the above-described gross rental rate increase prohibition, existing law, upon the expiration of rental restrictions, as defined, authorizes the owner of affordable housing units that meet certain requirements to establish the initial rental rate for the unit, and also authorizes the owner of an assisted housing development who demonstrates compliance with certain requirements under penalty of perjury to establish the initial unassisted rental rate for units in the assisted housing development. Existing law repeals these provisions on January 1, 2030.

This bill would remove the January 1, 2030, repeal date, thereby extending the initial rental rate authorizations indefinitely. By extending provisions that require the owner of an assisted housing development to demonstrate compliance with specified requirements under penalty of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated program.

(4)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Existing law defines a nuisance as anything injurious to health, indecent or offensive to the senses, or an obstruction to the free use of property, as specified. Under existing law, a nuisance includes the exhibition of a motion picture in which an intentional killing of, or cruelty to, a human being or an animal is shown if that action actually occurred in the production of the motion picture. Existing law authorizes the district attorney or the Attorney General to commence an action in equity to abate and prevent this nuisance and to perpetually enjoin the person conducting or maintaining it, as provided.This bill would specify that this authorization also applies to the county counsel.

Discussed in Hearing

Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary1H
Jan 13, 2026

Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary

Assembly Standing Committee on Housing and Community Development1H
Apr 24, 2025

Assembly Standing Committee on Housing and Community Development

View Older Hearings

News Coverage:

AB 1157: Tenancy: just cause termination: rent increases. | Digital Democracy