Bills

AB 46: Diversion.

  • Session Year: 2025-2026
  • House: Assembly

Current Status:

In Progress

(2025-08-18: In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.)

Introduced

First Committee Review

First Chamber

Second Committee Review

Second Chamber

Enacted

Version:

Existing law authorizes a court to grant pretrial diversion to a defendant suffering from a mental disorder, on an accusatory pleading alleging the commission of a misdemeanor or felony offense, in order to allow the defendant to undergo mental health treatment. Existing law provides that a defendant is eligible for diversion if they have been diagnosed with certain mental disorders and the court finds that the mental disorder was a significant factor in the commission of the charged offense, unless there is clear and convincing evidence that the disorder was not a motivating, causal, or contributing factor to the defendants involvement in the alleged offense. Existing law prohibits defendants charged with specified offenses, including murder, from being placed in this diversion program.

This bill would, if the defendant has been diagnosed with a mental disorder within 5 years prior to of the current offense, as specified, require the court to find that the defendants mental disorder was a significant factor in the commission of the offense, unless there is clear and convincing a preponderance of evidence that it was not a motivating, causal, or contributing factor to the defendants involvement in the alleged offense.

Existing law makes a defendant eligible for this diversion program if, among other criteria, the defendant will not pose an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety if treated in the community, as specified.

The bill would instead require that the defendant not endanger public safety, as defined, if treated in the community.

The bill would specify that a court retains discretion to deny diversion, even if a defendant is otherwise suitable for diversion, upon a finding that it is more likely than not that the defendant will pose an unreasonable risk to the physical safety of another person. The bill would require the court to state the reasons for denial on the record.

Discussed in Hearing

Senate Standing Committee on Public Safety39MIN
Jul 8, 2025

Senate Standing Committee on Public Safety

Assembly Floor3MIN
May 19, 2025

Assembly Floor

Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations1MIN
May 14, 2025

Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations

Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety31MIN
Apr 29, 2025

Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety

View Older Hearings

News Coverage:

AB 46: Diversion. | Digital Democracy