Bills

SB 658: Real property impacted by the 2025 Eaton or Palisades Fires: notification of owner’s intent to sell.

  • Session Year: 2025-2026
  • House: Senate

Current Status:

In Progress

(2025-05-23: May 23 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.)

Introduced

First Committee Review

First Chamber

Second Committee Review

Second Chamber

Enacted

Version:

Existing law establishes various real estate disclosure requirements applicable to the transfer of residential real property. On January 7, 2025, the Governor proclaimed a state of emergency to exist in the Counties of Los Angeles and Ventura due to fire and windstorm conditions that caused multiple fires, including the Eaton and Palisades Fires.

This bill would provide require the County of Los Angeles to develop a process for specified governmental or nonprofit organizations a right to match the price and terms of an offer to purchase certain residential or fire-damaged commercial to notify the county of their interest in purchasing specified types of real property located within an area impacted by the Eaton or Palisades Fires. In this regard, the bill would require the cities that have jurisdiction in the area and the County of Los Angeles to develop a process for those organizations to notify the city or county of their interest in purchasing real property subject to the bills provisions and within the jurisdiction of that city or county. The bill would refer to an organization that has provided that notice as a qualified entity, and would require each city and the county to maintain on its internet website a list of those qualified entities on their internet websites. the organizations that have provided the county with that notification. By imposing new duties on those cities and the County of Los Angeles, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require allow the owner of property subject to the bills provisions, before taking certain actions to sell the property, provisions to notify each qualified entity the County of Los Angeles or an organization on the countys list of the owners intent to sell the property. The bill would provide each qualified entity with 10 days to notify the property owner of their interest in purchasing the property and further provide a qualified entity with either 60 days or 40 days, depending on the number of units of the property, to submit an offer to purchase the property. This bill would allow a property owner to sell the property to any party if the property owner does not receive any interest to purchase the property from a qualified entity or receive an offer from a qualified entity within these timeframes. The bill would allow a property owner to reject any offer received from a qualified entity and sell to a party that is not a qualified entity, but would provide a qualified entity that submits a rejected offer with 10 days to invoke a right of first refusal to match a subsequent offer accepted by the property owner.

This property, as specified. The bill would make the provisions described above effective for repeal its provisions 6 years following the expiration of a the last declared disaster or state of emergency resulting from the Eaton or Palisades Fires. The bill would exempt certain transfers of a residential real property from its provisions, including, among others, a transfer between spouses, domestic partners, or specified family members, a transfer pursuant to a court order, and a transfer by eminent domain. The bill would make related findings and declarations.

This bill would require an owner that sells a property subject to the bills provisions to record, or cause to be recorded, a certification of compliance under penalty of perjury at the time of sale, as specified, and would make failure to file the certificate an infraction punishable as specified. By expanding the crime of perjury and creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.This bill would impose additional requirements on a qualified entity that purchases, pursuant to these provisions, property that is, or was on January 7, 2025, occupied by tenants. In this regard, the bill would require the qualified entity to retain all existing tenancies and to restore tenancies terminated due to the Eaton or Palisades Fires, as specified. The bill would require the qualified entity to make vacant units of the property affordable to persons and families of specified income levels that would depend on the average rental rate or housing cost of the units, as specified. The bill would require these affordability requirements to be contained in a covenant or restriction recorded against the property at the time of sale. The bill would prohibit the qualified entity from selling the property except to a qualified purchaser, as provided. The bill would make these requirements applicable to successive owners.This bill, on or before July 1, 2026, would require the cities that have jurisdiction in the area and the County of Los Angeles to jointly convene a working group consisting of individuals and organizations representing individuals who were impacted by the fires, as specified, to provide input on the development of guidelines that, upon adoption by the city or county, would govern new development and disposition of single-family property that was damaged or destroyed by the fires and was used as the owners primary residence on January 7, 2025, or fire-damaged commercial real property that a qualified entity purchases. By imposing new duties on those cities and the County of Los Angeles, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require a qualified entity that purchases such property, and successive owners, to adhere to those guidelines.This bill would grant a private cause of action to specified entities to enforce the provisions of the bill, and would allow for civil remedies, as specified.Existing law imposes various requirements to be satisfied prior to exercising a power of sale under a mortgage or deed of trust. Existing law, with respect to residential real property containing up to 4 dwelling units, requires a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent to provide to the mortgagor or trustor a copy of the recorded notice of default and a copy of the recorded notice of sale.This bill would require a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent, within 3 business days of recording a notice of default against multifamily residential real property or fire-damaged commercial real property subject to the bills provisions described above, to provide to the mortgagor or trustor a list of qualified entities, and to post a copy of the notice of default in a conspicuous place on the property, as provided. The bill would make these provisions effective for 6 years following the expiration of a declared disaster or state of emergency resulting from the Eaton or Palisades Fires.The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.

This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the above-described cities and the County of Los Angeles.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Discussed in Hearing

Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations39SEC
May 12, 2025

Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations

Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary9MIN
Apr 22, 2025

Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary

View Older Hearings

News Coverage:

SB 658: Real property impacted by the 2025 Eaton or Palisades Fires: notification of owner’s intent to sell. | Digital Democracy