AB 1142: Mining and geology: surface mining.
- Session Year: 2015-2016
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2016-04-18
(1)The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 prohibits a person, with exceptions, from conducting surface mining operations unless, among other things, a permit is obtained from, a specified reclamation plan is submitted to and approved by, and financial assurances for reclamation have been approved by the lead agency for the operation of the surface mining operation.
This bill would revise and recast provisions of the act related to the approval of reclamation plans and, among other things, would require a reclamation plan filed by an operator of a surface mining operation with a lead agency to include specified reclamation maps; require a lead agency, when submitting a proposed reclamation plan to the Director of Conservation, to incorporate specified items of information and documents in the submitted reclamation plan within certain timeframes; and require the director to take certain actions upon receiving a proposed reclamation plan. By adding to the duties of a local government acting as a lead agency under the act, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
This bill would revise and recast provisions of the act related to financial assurances and, among other things, would require an operator to replace an approved financial assurance only if the financial assurance cost estimate identifies a need to increase the amount of the financial assurance; require a lead agency to submit a surface mining operations proposed financial assurance cost estimate to the director for review, as specified; and require the director to take certain actions upon receiving a financial assurance cost estimate from a lead agency. By adding to the duties of a local government acting as a lead agency under the act, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
This bill also would require a lead agency or the State Mining and Geology Board to conduct a specified public hearing if the lead agency has evidence that an operator may be financially incapable of performing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan or that the operator has abandoned a surface mining operation without completing reclamation and to take appropriate actions to forfeit the operators financial assurances if warranted following that hearing.
This bill would require the director, no later than December 31, 2021, to submit a specified report to the Legislature on the expenditure of moneys in the Mine Reclamation Account.
(2)The act requires the owner or operator of a mining operation to forward annually to the director and the lead agency a report that provides, among other things, proof of annual inspection by the lead agency. The act also requires every lead agency to adopt ordinances that establish procedures for the review and approval of reclamation plans, and, before approving a reclamation plan, to submit the plan to the director. The act requires a lead agency to inspect a surface mining operation within 6 months of receiving a specified report and to conduct an inspection no less than once every calendar year. The act authorizes a lead agency to cause an inspection to be conducted by a state-licensed geologist, state-licensed civil engineer, state-licensed landscape architect, or state-licensed forester, as specified.
This bill would revise and recast those provisions and, among other things, would authorize a lead agency to cause an inspection to be conducted by a qualified employee of the lead agency who meets specified criteria and who, after January 1, 2020, has completed an inspection workshop, as provided; impose new requirements on the lead agency related to the timing of inspections; and require the department to establish a training program for lead agency employees who inspect surface mining operations no later than December 31, 2017. By adding to the duties of a local government acting as a lead agency, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3)The act requires that the lead agency have primary responsibility in enforcing the act. The act authorizes, in cases where the board is not the lead agency, the director to initiate enforcement actions if the lead agency has been notified by the director, for at least 30 days, of a violation and has not taken appropriate enforcement action, or the director determines there is a violation that presents an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or safety or the environment. The act establishes procedures and timelines for an operator to have an order setting administrative penalties reviewed by a legislative body of a lead agency, the board, or a superior court.
This bill would revise and recast those provisions and, among other things, would revise the timelines and actions related to the issuance of an order to comply and, after the expiration of a specified review period, authorize the director or the board when it acts as a lead agency to apply to the small claims court or the superior court, as appropriate, for a judgment to collect an unpaid administrative penalty.
(4)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(5)This bill would make its operation contingent on the enactment and operation of Senate Bill 209 of the 201516 Regular Session.
(1)The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 prohibits a person, with exceptions, from conducting surface mining operations unless, among other things, a permit is obtained from, a specified reclamation plan is submitted to and approved by, and financial assurances for reclamation have been approved by the lead agency for the operation of the surface mining operation.
This bill would revise and recast provisions of the act related to the approval of reclamation plans and, among other things, would require a reclamation plan filed by an operator of a surface mining operation with a lead agency to include specified reclamation maps; require a lead agency, when submitting a proposed reclamation plan to the Director of Conservation, to incorporate specified items of information and documents in the submitted reclamation plan within certain timeframes; and require the director to take certain actions upon receiving a proposed reclamation plan. By adding to the duties of a local government acting as a lead agency under the act, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
This bill would revise and recast provisions of the act related to financial assurances and, among other things, would require an operator to replace an approved financial assurance only if the financial assurance cost estimate identifies a need to increase the amount of the financial assurance; require a lead agency to submit a surface mining operations proposed financial assurance cost estimate to the director for review, as specified; and require the director to take certain actions upon receiving a financial assurance cost estimate from a lead agency. By adding to the duties of a local government acting as a lead agency under the act, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
This bill also would require a lead agency or the State Mining and Geology Board to conduct a specified public hearing if the lead agency has evidence that an operator may be financially incapable of performing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan or that the operator has abandoned a surface mining operation without completing reclamation and to take appropriate actions to forfeit the operators financial assurances if warranted following that hearing.
This bill would require the director, no later than December 31, 2021, to submit a specified report to the Legislature on the expenditure of moneys in the Mine Reclamation Account.
(2)The act requires the owner or operator of a mining operation to forward annually to the director and the lead agency a report that provides, among other things, proof of annual inspection by the lead agency. The act also requires every lead agency to adopt ordinances that establish procedures for the review and approval of reclamation plans, and, before approving a reclamation plan, to submit the plan to the director. The act requires a lead agency to inspect a surface mining operation within 6 months of receiving a specified report and to conduct an inspection no less than once every calendar year. The act authorizes a lead agency to cause an inspection to be conducted by a state-licensed geologist, state-licensed civil engineer, state-licensed landscape architect, or state-licensed forester, as specified.
This bill would revise and recast those provisions and, among other things, would authorize a lead agency to cause an inspection to be conducted by a qualified employee of the lead agency who meets specified criteria and who, after January 1, 2020, has completed an inspection workshop, as provided; impose new requirements on the lead agency related to the timing of inspections; and require the department to establish a training program for lead agency employees who inspect surface mining operations no later than December 31, 2017. By adding to the duties of a local government acting as a lead agency, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3)The act requires that the lead agency have primary responsibility in enforcing the act. The act authorizes, in cases where the board is not the lead agency, the director to initiate enforcement actions if the lead agency has been notified by the director, for at least 30 days, of a violation and has not taken appropriate enforcement action, or the director determines there is a violation that presents an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or safety or the environment. The act establishes procedures and timelines for an operator to have an order setting administrative penalties reviewed by a legislative body of a lead agency, the board, or a superior court.
This bill would revise and recast those provisions and, among other things, would revise the timelines and actions related to the issuance of an order to comply and, after the expiration of a specified review period, authorize the director or the board when it acts as a lead agency to apply to the small claims court or the superior court, as appropriate, for a judgment to collect an unpaid administrative penalty.
(4)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(5)This bill would make its operation contingent on the enactment and operation of Senate Bill 209 of the 201516 Regular Session.
(1)The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 prohibits a person, with exceptions, from conducting surface mining operations unless, among other things, a permit is obtained from, a specified reclamation plan is submitted to and approved by, and financial assurances for reclamation have been approved by the lead agency for the operation of the surface mining operation.
This bill would revise and recast provisions of the act related to the approval of reclamation plans and, among other things, would require a reclamation plan filed by an operator of a surface mining operation with a lead agency to include specified reclamation maps; require a lead agency, when submitting a proposed reclamation plan to the Director of Conservation, to incorporate specified items of information and documents in the submitted reclamation plan within certain timeframes; and require the director to take certain actions upon receiving a proposed reclamation plan. By adding to the duties of a local government acting as a lead agency under the act, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
This bill would revise and recast provisions of the act related to financial assurances and, among other things, would require an operator to replace an approved financial assurance only if the financial assurance cost estimate identifies a need to increase the amount of the financial assurance; require a lead agency to submit a surface mining operations proposed financial assurance cost estimate to the director for review, as specified; and require the director to take certain actions upon receiving a financial assurance cost estimate from a lead agency. By adding to the duties of a local government acting as a lead agency under the act, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
This bill also would require a lead agency or the State Mining and Geology Board to conduct a specified public hearing if the lead agency has evidence that an operator may be financially incapable of performing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan or that the operator has abandoned a surface mining operation without completing reclamation and to take appropriate actions to forfeit the operators financial assurances if warranted following that hearing.
This bill would require the director, no later than December 31, 2021, to submit a specified report to the Legislature on the expenditure of moneys in the Mine Reclamation Account.
(2)The act requires the owner or operator of a mining operation to forward annually to the director and the lead agency a report that provides, among other things, proof of annual inspection by the lead agency. The act also requires every lead agency to adopt ordinances that establish procedures for the review and approval of reclamation plans, and, before approving a reclamation plan, to submit the plan to the director. The act requires a lead agency to inspect a surface mining operation within 6 months of receiving a specified report and to conduct an inspection no less than once every calendar year. The act authorizes a lead agency to cause an inspection to be conducted by a state-licensed geologist, state-licensed civil engineer, state-licensed landscape architect, or state-licensed forester, as specified.
This bill would revise and recast those provisions and, among other things, would require the owner or operator to provide a copy of the previously completed annual inspection form and a requested date within 12 months of the prior inspection date for the next annual inspection by the lead agency; authorize a lead agency to cause an inspection to be conducted by an unlicensed a qualified employee of the lead agency who meets specified criteria and who, after January 1, 2019, 2020, has completed an inspection workshop, as provided; impose new requirements on the lead agency related to the timing of inspections; impose timelines on a lead agency related to the submission of an application for a permit to conduct a surface mining operation; and require the director department to provide establish a training program for lead agency employees who inspect surface mining operations after January 1, 2019. no later than December 31, 2017. By adding to the duties of a local government acting as a lead agency, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3)The act requires that the lead agency have primary responsibility in enforcing the act. The act authorizes, in cases where the board is not the lead agency, the director to initiate enforcement actions if the lead agency has been notified by the director, for at least 30 days, of a violation and has not taken appropriate enforcement action, or the director determines there is a violation that presents an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or safety or the environment. The act establishes procedures and timelines for an operator to have an order setting administrative penalties reviewed by a legislative body of a lead agency, the board, or a superior court.
This bill would revise and recast those provisions and, among other things, would revise the timelines and actions related to the issuance of an order to comply and, after the expiration of a specified review period, authorize the director or the board when it acts as a lead agency to apply to the small claims court or the superior court, as appropriate, for a judgment to collect an unpaid administrative penalty.
(4)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(5)This bill would make its operation contingent on the enactment and operation of Senate Bill 209 of the 201516 Regular Session.
(1)The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 prohibits a person, with exceptions, from conducting surface mining operations unless, among other things, a permit is obtained from, a specified reclamation plan is submitted to and approved by, and financial assurances for reclamation have been approved by the lead agency for the operation of the surface mining operation.
This bill would revise and recast provisions of the act related to the approval of reclamation plans and, among other things, would require a reclamation plan filed by an operator of a surface mining operation with a lead agency to include specified reclamation maps; require a lead agency, when submitting a proposed reclamation plan to the Director of Conservation, to incorporate specified items of information and documents in the submitted reclamation plan within certain timeframes; and, and require the director to take certain actions upon receiving a proposed reclamation plan. By adding to the duties of a local government acting as a lead agency under the act, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
This bill would revise and recast provisions of the act related to financial assurances and, among other things, would require financial assurance cost estimates to be submitted for review and include estimates of the time needed to complete reclamation of the mine; require an operator to replace an approved financial assurance only if the financial assurance cost estimate identifies a need to increase the amount of the financial assurance; require a lead agency to submit a surface mining operations proposed financial assurance cost estimate to the director for review, as specified; and require the director to take certain actions upon receiving a financial assurance cost estimate from a lead agency. By adding to the duties of a local government acting as a lead agency under the act, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
This bill also would require a lead agency or the State Mining and Geology Board to conduct a specified public hearing if the lead agency has evidence that an operator may be financially incapable of performing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan or that the operator has abandoned a surface mining operation without completing reclamation and to take appropriate actions to forfeit the operators financial assurances if warranted following that hearing.
This bill would require the director, no later than December 31, 2021, to submit a specified report to the Legislature on the expenditure of moneys in the Mine Reclamation Account.
(2)The act requires the owner or operator of a mining operation to forward annually to the director and the lead agency a report that provides, among other things, proof of annual inspection by the lead agency. The act also requires every lead agency to adopt ordinances that establish procedures for the review and approval of reclamation plans, and, before approving a reclamation plan, to submit the plan to the director. The act requires a lead agency to inspect a surface mining operation within 6 months of receiving a specified report and to conduct an inspection no less than once every calendar year. The act authorizes a lead agency to cause an inspection to be conducted by a state-licensed geologist, state-licensed civil engineer, state-licensed landscape architect, or state-licensed forester, as specified.
This bill would revise and recast those provisions and, among other things, would require the owner or operator to provide a copy of the previously completed annual inspection form and a requested date within 12 months of the prior inspection date for the next annual inspection by the lead agency; authorize a lead agency to cause an inspection to be conducted by an unlicensed employee of the lead agency who meets specified criteria and who, after January 1, 2018 2019, has completed an inspection workshop, as provided; impose new requirements on the lead agency related to the timing of inspections; impose timelines on a lead agency related to the submission of an application for a permit to conduct a surface mining operation; and require the director to provide an inspection workshop and update workshop a training program for lead agency employees who inspect surface mining operations after January 1, 2018 2019. By adding to the duties of a local government acting as a lead agency, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3)The act requires that the lead agency have primary responsibility in enforcing the act. The act authorizes, in cases where the board is not the lead agency, the director to initiate enforcement actions if the lead agency has been notified by the director, for at least 15 30 days, of a violation and has not taken appropriate enforcement action, or the director determines there is a violation that presents an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or safety or the environment. The act establishes procedures and timelines for an operator to have an order setting administrative penalties reviewed by a legislative body of a lead agency, the board, or a superior court.
This bill would revise and recast those provisions and, among other things, would revise the timelines and actions related to the issuance of an order to comply and, after the expiration of a specified review period, would authorize the director or the board when it acts as a lead agency to apply to the small claims court or the superior court, as appropriate, for a judgment to collect an unpaid administrative penalty.
(4)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(5)This bill would make its operation contingent on the enactment and operation of Senate Bill 209 of the 201516 Regular Session.
(1)The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 prohibits a person, with exceptions, from conducting surface mining operations unless, among other things, a permit is obtained from, a specified reclamation plan is submitted to and approved by, and financial assurances for reclamation have been approved by the lead agency for the operation of the surface mining operation.
This bill would revise and recast provisions of the act related to the approval of reclamation plans and, among other things, would require a reclamation plan filed by an operator of a surface mining operation with a lead agency to include specified reclamation maps; require a lead agency, when submitting a proposed reclamation plan to the Director of Conservation, to incorporate specified items of information and documents in the submitted reclamation plan within certain timeframes; and, require the director to take certain actions upon receiving a proposed reclamation plan. By adding to the duties of a local government acting as a lead agency under the act, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
This bill would revise and recast provisions of the act related to financial assurances and, among other things, would require financial assurance cost estimates to be submitted for review and include estimates of the time needed to complete reclamation of the mine; require an operator to replace an approved financial assurance only if the financial assurance cost estimate identifies a need to increase the amount of the financial assurance; require a lead agency to submit a surface mining operations proposed financial assurance cost estimate to the director for review, as specified; and, and require the director to take certain actions upon receiving a financial assurance cost estimate from a lead agency. By adding to the duties of a local government acting as a lead agency under the act, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
This bill also would require a lead agency or the State Mining and Geology Board to conduct a specified public hearing if the lead agency has evidence that an operator may be financially incapable of performing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan or that the operator has abandoned a surface mining operation without completing reclamation and to take appropriate actions to seize forfeit the operators financial assurances if warranted following that hearing.
(2)The act requires the owner or operator of a mining operation to forward annually to the director and the lead agency a report that provides, among other things, proof of annual inspection by the lead agency. The act also requires every lead agency to adopt ordinances that establish procedures for the review and approval of reclamation plans, and, before approving a reclamation plan, to submit the plan to the director. The act requires a lead agency to inspect a surface mining operation within 6 months of receiving a specified report and to conduct an inspection no less than once every calendar year. The act authorizes a lead agency to cause an inspection to be conducted by a state licensed state-licensed geologist, state licensed state-licensed civil engineer, state licensed state-licensed landscape architect, or state licensed state-licensed forester, as specified.
This bill would revise and recast those provisions and, among other things, would require the owner or operator to provide a copy of the previously completed annual inspection form and a requested date for the next annual inspection by the lead agency; authorize a lead agency to cause an inspection to be conducted by an unlicensed employee of the lead agency who meets specified criteria and who, after January 1, 2018, has completed an inspection workshop, as provided; impose new requirements on the lead agency related to the timing of inspections; impose timelines on a lead agency related to the submission of an application for a permit to conduct a surface mining operation; and require the director to provide an inspection workshop and update workshop for lead agency employees who inspect surface mining operations after January 1, 2018. By adding to the duties of local agencies, a local government acting as a lead agency, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3)The act requires that the lead agency have primary responsibility in enforcing the act. The act authorizes, in cases where the board is not the lead agency, the director to initiate enforcement actions if the lead agency has been notified by the director, for at least 15 days, of a violation and has not taken appropriate enforcement action, or the director determines there is a violation that presents an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or safety or the environment. The act establishes procedures and timelines for an operator to have an order setting administrative penalties reviewed by a legislative body of a lead agency, the board, or a superior court.
This bill, after the expiration of a specified review period, would authorize the director or the board when it acts as a lead agency to apply to the small claims court or the superior court, as appropriate, for a judgment to collect an unpaid administrative penalty.
(4)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(1)The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 prohibits a person, with exceptions, from conducting surface mining operations unless, among other things, a permit is obtained from, a specified reclamation plan is submitted to and approved by, and financial assurances for reclamation have been approved by the lead agency for the operation of the surface mining operation.
This bill would revise and recast provisions of the act related to the approval of reclamation plans and, among other things, would require a reclamation plan filed by an operator of a surface mining operation with a lead agency to include specified reclamation maps; require a lead agency, when submitting a proposed reclamation plan to the Director of Conservation, to incorporate specified items of information and documents in the submitted reclamation plan within certain timeframes; and, require the director to take certain actions upon receiving a proposed reclamation plan. By adding to the duties of a local government acting as a lead agency under the act, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
This bill would revise and recast provisions of the act related to financial assurances and, among other things, would require financial assurance cost estimates be submitted for review and include estimates of the time needed to complete reclamation of the mine and mine; require an operator to replace an approved financial assurance only if the financial assurance cost estimate identifies a need to increase the amount of the financial assurance assurance; require a lead agency to submit a surface mining operations proposed financial assurance cost estimate to the director for review, as specified; and, require the director to take certain actions upon receiving a financial assurance cost estimate from a lead agency. By adding to the duties of local agencies, a local government acting as a lead agency under the act, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
This bill also would require a lead agency or the State Mining and Geology Board to conduct a specified public hearing if the lead agency has evidence that an operator may be financially incapable of performing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan or that the operator has abandoned a surface mining operation without completing reclamation and to take appropriate actions to seize the operators financial assurances if warranted following that hearing.
(2)The act requires the owner or operator of a mining operation to forward annually to the Director of Conservation director and the lead agency a report that provides, among other things, proof of annual inspection by the lead agency. The act also requires every lead agency to adopt ordinances that establish procedures for the review and approval of reclamation plans, and, before approving a reclamation plan, to submit the plan to the director. The act requires a lead agency to inspect a surface mining operation within 6 months of receiving a specified report and to conduct an inspection no less than once every calendar year. The act authorizes a lead agency to cause an inspection to be conducted by a state licensed geologist, state licensed civil engineer, state licensed landscape architect, or state licensed forester, as specified.
This bill would revise and recast those provisions and, among other things, would require the owner or operator to provide a copy of the previously completed annual inspection form and a requested date for the next annual inspection by the lead agency, agency; authorize a lead agency to cause an inspection to be conducted by an unlicensed employee of the lead agency who meets specified criteria and who, after January 1, 2018, has completed an inspection workshop, as provided, provided; impose new requirements on the lead agency related to the timing of inspections, inspections; impose timelines on a lead agency related to the submission of an application for a permit to conduct a surface mining operation, operation; and require the director to provide an inspection workshop and update workshop for lead agency employees who inspect surface mining operations after January 1, 2018. By adding to the duties of local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3)The act requires that the lead agency have primary responsibility in enforcing the act. The act authorizes, in cases where the board is not the lead agency, the director to initiate enforcement actions if the lead agency has been notified by the director, for at least 15 days, of a violation and has not taken appropriate enforcement action, or the director determines there is a violation that presents an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or safety or the environment. The act establishes procedures and timelines for an operator to have an order setting administrative penalties reviewed by a legislative body of a lead agency, the board, or a superior court.
This bill, after the expiration of a specified review period, would authorize the director or the board when it acts as a lead agency to apply to the small claims court or the superior court, as appropriate, for a judgment to collect an unpaid administrative penalty.
(4)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(1)The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 prohibits a person, with exceptions, from conducting surface mining operations unless, among other things, a permit is obtained from, a specified reclamation plan is submitted to and approved by, and financial assurances for reclamation have been approved by the lead agency for the operation of the surface mining operation.
This bill would revise and recast provisions of the act related to financial assurances and, among other things, would require financial assurance cost estimates be submitted for review and include estimates of the time needed to complete reclamation of the mine and require an operator to replace an approved financial assurance only if the financial assurance cost estimate identifies a need to increase the amount of the financial assurance. By adding to the duties of local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(2)The act requires the owner or operator of a mining operation to forward annually to the Director of Conservation and the lead agency a report that provides, among other things, proof of annual inspection by the lead agency. The act also requires every lead agency to adopt ordinances that establish procedures for the review and approval of reclamation plans, and, before approving a reclamation plan, to submit the plan to the director. The act requires a lead agency to inspect a surface mining operation within 6 months of receiving a specified report and to conduct an inspection no less than once every calendar year. The act authorizes a lead agency to cause an inspection to be conducted by a state licensed geologist, state licensed civil engineer, state licensed landscape architect, or state licensed forester, as specified.
This bill would revise and recast those provisions and, among other things, would require the owner or operator to provide a copy of the previously completed annual inspection form and a requested date for the next annual inspection by the lead agency, require authorize a lead agency to cause an inspection to be conducted by an unlicensed employee of the lead agency who has received specified training, meets specified criteria and who, after January 1, 2018, has completed an inspection workshop, as provided, impose new requirements on the lead agency related to the timing of inspections, impose timelines on a lead agency related to the submission of an application for a permit to conduct a surface mining operation, and require the State Geologist to coordinate with the director, board, lead agencies, and interested parties to develop a curriculum for the training of mine inspectors. director to provide an inspection workshop and update workshop for lead agency employees who inspect surface mining operations after January 1, 2018. By adding to the duties of local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3)The act requires that the lead agency have primary responsibility in enforcing the act. The act authorizes, in cases where the board is not the lead agency, the director to initiate enforcement actions if the lead agency has been notified by the director, for at least 15 days, of a violation and has not taken appropriate enforcement action, or the director determines there is a violation that presents an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or safety or the environment. The act establishes procedures and timelines for an operator to have an order setting administrative penalties reviewed by a legislative body of a lead agency, the board, or a superior court.
This bill, after the expiration of a specified review period, would authorize the director or the board when it acts as a lead agency to apply to the small claims court or the superior court, as appropriate, for a judgment to collect an unpaid administrative penalty.
(4)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(1)The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 requires the department to publish in the California Regulatory Notice Register, or otherwise make available upon request to the Department of General Services or any other state or local agency, a list identifying certain surface mining operations. Existing law also prohibits a state agency from acquiring or utilizing mined material, or from contracting with a person utilizing these materials, as specified, unless the material is produced from a mining operation on that list that meets certain requirements. The act, until January 1, 2019, requires this list to identify surface mining operations whose reclamation plan has been approved and is in compliance with the act, whose mining operation is in compliance with the approved reclamation plan or an order to comply, as specified, and whose mining operation has an approved financial assurance, as specified.
This bill would continue indefinitely the inclusion on the list the identification of those surface mining operations.
(2)
(1)The act Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 prohibits a person, with exceptions, from conducting surface mining operations unless, among other things, a permit is obtained from, a specified reclamation plan is submitted to and approved by, and financial assurances for reclamation have been approved by the lead agency for the operation of the surface mining operation.
This bill would revise and recast provisions of the act related to financial assurances and, among other things, would prohibit an operator from being required to adjust financial assurances that are in excess of the amount determined necessary to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan, require financial assurance cost estimates be submitted for review and include estimates of the time needed to complete reclamation of the mine, and prescribe the actions to be taken by an operator, lead agency, and the director prior to the modification of the amount of a financial assurance or the full or partial release of the financial assurance instrument. mine and require an operator to replace an approved financial assurance only if the financial assurance cost estimate identifies a need to increase the amount of the financial assurance. By adding to the duties of local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3)
(2)The act requires the owner or operator of a mining operation to forward annually to the director Director of Conservation and the lead agency a report that provides, among other things, proof of annual inspection by the lead agency. The act also requires every lead agency to adopt ordinances that establish procedures for the review and approval of reclamation plans, and, before approving a reclamation plan, to submit the plan to the director. The act requires a lead agency to inspect a surface mining operation within 6 months of receiving a specified report and to conduct an inspection no less than once every calendar year. The act authorizes a lead agency to authorize cause an inspection to be conducted by a state licensed geologist, state licensed civil engineer, state licensed landscape architect, or state licensed forester, as specified.
This bill would revise and recast those provisions and, among other things, would require the owner or operator to provide a copy of the previously completed annual inspection form and a requested date for the next annual inspection by the lead agency, require a lead agency to authorize cause an inspection to be conducted by an employee of the lead agency who has received specified training, impose new requirements on the lead agency related to the timing of inspections, impose timelines on a lead agency related to the submission of an application for a permit to conduct a surface mining operation, and require the State Geologist to coordinate with the director, board, lead agencies, and interested parties to develop a curriculum for the training of mine inspectors. By adding to the duties of local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(4)
(3)The act requires that the lead agency have primary responsibility in enforcing the act. The act authorizes, in cases where the board is not the lead agency, the director to initiate enforcement actions if the lead agency has been notified by the director, for at least 15 days, of a violation and has not taken appropriate enforcement action, or the director determines there is a violation that presents an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or safety or the environment. The act establishes procedures and timelines for an operator to have an order setting administrative penalties reviewed by a legislative body of a lead agency, the board, or a superior court.
This bill would require the lead agency, the director, or the board, as appropriate, to take into account and seek to minimize the impact of any proposed enforcement action on the number of existing jobs supported directly or indirectly by the surface mining operation.
This bill, after the expiration of a specified review period, would authorize the director or the board when it acts as a lead agency to apply to the small claims court or the superior court, as appropriate, for a judgment to collect an unpaid administrative penalty.
(5)
(4)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(1)The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 requires the department to publish in the California Regulatory Notice Register, or otherwise make available, upon request, available upon request to the Department of General Services or any other state or local agency, a list identifying certain surface mining operations. Existing law also prohibits a state agency from acquiring or utilizing mined material, or from contracting with a person utilizing these materials, as specified, unless the material is produced from a mining operation on that list that meets certain requirements. The act, until January 1, 2019, requires this list to identify surface mining operations whose reclamation plan has been approved and is in compliance with the act, whose mining operation is in compliance with the approved reclamation plan or an order to comply, as specified, and whose mining operation has an approved financial assurance, as specified.
This bill would continue indefinitely the inclusion on the list the identification of those surface mining operations.
(2)The act prohibits a person, with exceptions, from conducting surface mining operations unless, among other things, a permit is obtained from, a specified reclamation plan is submitted to and approved by, and financial assurances for reclamation have been approved by the lead agency for the operation of the surface mining operation.
This bill would revise and recast provisions of the act related to financial assurances and, among other things, would prohibit an operator from being required to adjust financial assurances that are in excess of the amount determined necessary to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan, require financial assurance cost estimates be submitted for review and include estimates of the time needed to complete reclamation of the mine, and prescribe the actions to be taken by an operator, lead agency, and the director prior to the modification of the amount of a financial assurance or the full or partial release of the financial assurance instrument. By adding to the duties of local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3)The act requires the owner or operator of a mining operation to forward annually to the director and the lead agency a report that provides, among other things, proof of annual inspection by the lead agency. The act also requires every lead agency to adopt ordinances that establish procedures for the review and approval of reclamation plans, and, before approving a reclamation plan, to submit the plan to the director. The act requires a lead agency to inspect a surface mining operation within 6 months of receiving a specified report and to conduct an inspection no less than once every calendar year. The act authorizes a lead agency to authorize an inspection to be conducted by a state licensed geologist, state licensed civil engineer, state licensed landscape architect, or state licensed forester, as specified.
This bill would revise and recast those provisions and, among other things, would require the owner or operator to provide a copy of the previously completed annual inspection form and a requested date for the next annual inspection by the lead agency, require a lead agency to authorize an inspection to be conducted by an employee of the local lead agency who has received specified training, impose new requirements on the lead agency related to the timing of inspections, impose timelines on a lead agency related to the submission of an application for a permit to conduct a surface mining operation, and require the State Geologist to coordinate with the director, board, lead agencies, and interested parties to develop a curriculum for the training of mine inspectors. By adding to the duties of local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(4)The act requires that the lead agency have primary responsibility in enforcing the act. The act authorizes, in cases where the board is not the lead agency, the director to initiate enforcement actions if the lead agency has been notified by the director, for at least 15 days, of a violation and has not taken appropriate enforcement action, or the director determines there is a violation that presents an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or safety, safety or the environment.
This bill would require the lead agency, the director, or the board, as appropriate, to take into account and seek to minimize the impact of any proposed enforcement action on the number of existing jobs supported directly or indirectly by the surface mining operation.
(5)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(1)The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 requires the department to publish in the California Regulatory Notice Register, or otherwise make available, upon request, to the Department of General Services or any other state or local agency, a list identifying certain surface mining operations. Existing law also prohibits a state agency from acquiring or utilizing mined material, or from contracting with a person utilizing these materials, as specified, unless the material is produced from a mining operation on that list that meets certain requirements. The act, until January 1, 2019, requires this list to identify surface mining operations whose reclamation plan has been approved and is in compliance with the act, whose mining operation is in compliance with the approved reclamation plan or an order to comply, as specified, and whose mining operation has an approved financial assurance, as specified.
This bill would continue indefinitely the inclusion on the list the identification of those surface mining operations.
(2)The act prohibits a person, with exceptions, from conducting surface mining operations unless, among other things, a permit is obtained from, a specified reclamation plan is submitted to and approved by, and financial assurances for reclamation have been approved by the lead agency for the operation of the surface mining operation.
This bill would revise and recast provisions of the act related to financial assurances and, among other things, would prohibit an operator being required to adjust financial assurances that are in excess of the amount determined necessary to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan, require financial assurance cost estimates be submitted for review and include estimates of the time needed to complete reclamation of the mine, and prescribe the actions to be taken by an operator, lead agency, and the director prior to the modification of the amount of a financial assurance or the full or partial release of the financial assurance instrument. By adding to the duties of local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3)The act requires the owner or operator of a mining operation to forward annually to the director and the lead agency a report that provides, among other things, proof of annual inspection by the lead agency. The act also requires every lead agency to adopt ordinances that establish procedures for the review and approval of reclamation plans, and, before approving a reclamation plan, to submit the plan to the director. The act requires a lead agency to inspect a surface mining operation within 6 months of receiving a specified report and to conduct an inspection no less than once every calendar year. The act authorizes a lead agency to authorize an inspection to be conducted by a state licensed geologist, state licensed civil engineer, state licensed landscape architect, or state licensed forester, as specified.
This bill would revise and recast those provisions and, among other things, would require the owner or operator to provide a copy of the previously completed annual inspection form and a requested date for the next annual inspection by the lead agency, require a lead agency to authorize an inspection to be conducted by an employee of the local agency who has received specified training, impose new requirements on the lead agency related to the timing of inspections, impose timelines on a lead agency related to the submission of an application for a permit to conduct a surface mining operation, and require the State Geologist to coordinate with the director, board, lead agencies, and interested parties to develop a curriculum for the training of mine inspectors. By adding to the duties of local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(4)The act requires that the lead agency have primary responsibility in enforcing the act. The act authorizes, in cases where the board is not the lead agency, the director to initiate enforcement actions if the lead agency has been notified by the director, for at least 15 days, of a violation and has not taken appropriate enforcement action, or the director determines there is a violation that presents an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or safety, or the environment.
This bill would require the lead agency, the director, or the board, as appropriate, to take into account and seek to minimize the impact of any proposed enforcement action on the number of existing jobs supported directly or indirectly by the surface mining operation.
(5)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(a)No later than December 31, 2021, the director shall report to the Legislature on the expenditure of moneys in the Mine Reclamation Account, created pursuant to Section 2207. The report shall include all of the following:
(1)An overview of how the moneys expended over the prior five fiscal years have been allocated between classification and designation of areas with mineral resources of statewide or regional significance, reclamation plan and financial assurance review, lead agency support and assistance, annual report processing, support for the board, enforcement, and any other activities that constituted more than 5 percent of expenditures.
(2)Information on the portion of the fees that have been collected from small construction aggregate providers with under 50,000 tons of production.
(3)Information on the percentage of the fees that have been paid by metallic mineral operations.
(b)This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2026, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2026, deletes or extends that date.
SEC. 2.Section 2715.5 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2715.5.(a)The Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, in conjunction with a site specific plan deemed consistent by the lead agency with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, until December 31, 2017, shall be considered to be a functional equivalent of a reclamation plan for the purposes of this chapter. No other reclamation plan shall be required to be reviewed and approved for any excavation project subject to the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan that is conducted in conformance with an approved site specific plan that is consistent with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan and the standards specified in that plan governing erosion control, channel stabilization, habitat restoration, flood control, or infrastructure maintenance, if that plan is reviewed and approved by a lead agency pursuant to this chapter.
(b)For the purposes of this section, the board of supervisors of the county in which the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan is to be implemented shall prepare and file the annual report required to be prepared pursuant to Section 2207.
(c)Nothing in this section precludes an enforcement action by the board or the department brought pursuant to this chapter or Section 2207 if the lead agency or the director determines that a surface mining operator, acting under the authority of the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, is not in compliance with the requirements of this chapter or Section 2207.
(d)For purposes of this section, site specific plan means an individual project plan approved by the lead agency that is consistent with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan. Site specific plans prepared in conformance with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan shall include, at a minimum, the information required pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2772, shall comply with the requirements of Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and shall be provided along with a financial assurance estimate to the department for review and comment pursuant to Section 2772.1 or 2773.4, as applicable. Notwithstanding the number of days authorized by subdivision (b) of Section 2772.1 or subdivision (c) of Section 2773.4, the department shall review the site specific plan and the financial assurance estimate and prepare any written comments within 15 days from the date of receipt of the plan and the estimate.
(e)Prior to engaging in an excavation activity in conformance with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, a surface mining operation shall be required to obtain financial assurances that meet the requirements of Section 2773.1.
(f)This section shall remain in effect only until December 31, 2017, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute that is enacted before December 31, 2017, deletes or extends that date.
SEC. 3.Section 2733 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2733.Reclamation means the combined process of land treatment that minimizes water degradation, air pollution, damage to aquatic or wildlife habitat, flooding, erosion, and other adverse effects from surface mining operations, including adverse surface effects incidental to underground mines, so that mined lands are reclaimed to a usable condition that is readily adaptable for alternate land uses and create no danger to public health or safety. The process may extend to affected lands surrounding mined lands, and may require backfilling, grading, resoiling, revegetation, soil compaction, slope stabilization, or other measures.
SEC. 4.Section 2736 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2736.Financial assurances means a current approved financial assurance cost estimate and a financial assurance mechanism that is at least equal to the current approved financial assurance cost estimate.
SEC. 5.Section 2770 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2770.(a)Except as provided in this section, a person shall not conduct surface mining operations unless a permit is obtained from, a reclamation plan has been submitted to and approved by, and financial assurances for reclamation have been approved by the lead agency for the operation pursuant to this article.
(b)A person with an existing surface mining operation who has vested rights pursuant to Section 2776 and who does not have an approved reclamation plan shall submit a reclamation plan to the lead agency not later than March 31, 1988. If a reclamation plan application is not on file by March 31, 1988, the continuation of the surface mining operation is prohibited until a reclamation plan is submitted to the lead agency. For the purposes of this subdivision, a reclamation plan existing prior to January 1, 2017, may consist of all or the appropriate sections of any plans or written agreements previously approved by the lead agency or another agency, together with any additional documents needed to substantially meet the requirements of Sections 2772 and 2773 and the lead agency surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774, provided that all documents, which together were proposed to serve as the reclamation plan, are submitted for approval to the lead agency in accordance with this chapter.
(c)[Reserved]
(d)[Reserved]
(e)(1)A person who can substantiate, based on the evidence of the record, that a lead agency has either (1) failed to act according to due process or has relied on considerations not related to the specific applicable requirements of Sections 2772, 2772.1, 2773, 2773.1, 2773.3, and 2773.4 and the lead agency surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774 in reaching a decision to deny approval of a reclamation plan or financial assurances for reclamation, or (2) failed to act within a reasonable time of receipt of a completed application may appeal that action or inaction to the board.
(2)The director may appeal a lead agencys approval of a financial assurance cost estimate to the board if the director has commented pursuant to Section 2773.4 that the financial assurance cost estimate is inadequate based on consideration of the following:
(A)Section 2773.1.
(B)Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
(C)The boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1
(3)If the approved financial assurance cost estimate applies to a reclamation plan approved for a new surface mining operation, an expanded surface mining operation, or an interim financial assurance due to an order to comply, stipulated or otherwise, the operator shall provide a financial assurance mechanism pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2773.4 in the amount of the approved financial assurance cost estimate, notwithstanding an appeal filed pursuant to this subdivision and subject to modification pending the outcome of the appeal.
(4)If the approved financial assurance cost estimate is an update to an existing approved financial assurance cost estimate, the existing financial assurance mechanism shall remain in place and shall not be adjusted until a final determination by the board on the appeal filed pursuant to this subdivision.
(f)(1)The board may decline to hear an appeal if it determines that the appeal raises no substantial issues related to the lead agencys decision to deny the approval of a reclamation plan or financial assurance, or the timeliness in reviewing a completed application. Appeals filed by the director shall be heard by the board.
(2)If the board takes up an appeal, the appeal shall be scheduled and heard at a public hearing within 45 days of the filing of the appeal, or a longer period as may be mutually agreed to by the board, the appellant, and the operator, or, if the appeal is filed by the director, by the board, the director, and the operator.
(g)(1)(A)When hearing an appeal filed pursuant to paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (e), the board shall determine whether the reclamation plan or the financial assurance cost estimate substantially meets the applicable requirements of Sections 2772, 2772.1, 2773, 2773.1, 2773.3, and 2773.4; Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500), Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700), and Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; and the lead agencys surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774. The board shall approve or uphold a reclamation plan or financial assurance cost estimate determined to meet those applicable requirements. In any event, financial assurances for reclamation shall be sufficient to perform reclamation of lands remaining disturbed.
(B)For purposes of this subdivision, substantially means actual compliance in respect to the substance and form requirements essential to the objectives of this chapter.
(2)(A)A reclamation plan determined not to meet the applicable requirements of Sections 2772, 2772.1, 2773, 2773.1, 2773.3, and 2773.4; Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500), Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700), and Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; and the lead agencys surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774 shall be returned to the operator with a notice of deficiencies. The operator shall be granted, once only, a period of 30 days or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the operator and the board to do both of the following:
(i)Correct the noted deficiencies.
(ii)Submit the revised reclamation plan to the lead agency for review and approval.
(B)Within 10 days of the hearing, the board shall provide notice via certified mail to the lead agency, the operator, and the department of the boards determination. The notice shall include instructions to the operator to submit to the lead agency for approval a revised reclamation plan consistent with the boards determination.
(3)(A)If the board determines the lead agencys approved financial assurance cost estimate does not meet the requirements of Sections 2773.1 and 2773.4, Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and the boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1, the board shall note the deficiencies and, based on the record, include adequate cost estimates for each noted deficiency.
(B)Within 10 days of the hearing, the board shall provide notice via certified mail to the lead agency, the operator, and the department of the boards determination with instructions to the operator to submit to the lead agency for approval a revised financial assurance cost estimate consistent with the boards determination. The instructions shall include a reasonable submission deadline of not less than 30 days.
(C)The lead agency shall approve the revised financial assurance cost estimate. That approval shall supersede and void the prior approved financial assurance cost estimate.
(D)A financial assurance mechanism shall be established by the operator pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2773.4 following the approval of the financial assurance cost estimate.
(E)The failure of the operator to submit to the lead agency a revised financial assurance cost estimate consistent with the boards determination and deadline may be grounds for the issuance of an order to comply pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774.1.
(h)(1)Within 90 days of a surface mining operation becoming idle, as defined in Section 2727.1, the operator shall submit to the lead agency for review and approval an interim management plan. The review and approval of an interim management plan shall not be considered a project for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)). The approved interim management plan shall be considered an amendment to the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan for purposes of this chapter. The interim management plan shall provide measures the operator will implement to maintain the site in compliance with this chapter, including, but not limited to, all permit conditions.
(2)The interim management plan may remain in effect for a period not to exceed five years, at which time the lead agency shall do one of the following:
(A)Renew the interim management plan for an additional period not to exceed five years, which may be renewed for one additional five-year renewal period at the expiration of the first five-year renewal period, if the lead agency finds that the surface mining operator has complied fully with the interim management plan.
(B)Require the operator to commence reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan.
(3)The financial assurances required by Section 2773.1 shall remain in effect during the period that the surface mining operation is idle. If the surface mining operation is still idle after the expiration of its interim management plan, the operator shall commence reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan.
(4)Within 60 days of the receipt of the interim management plan or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the lead agency and the operator, the lead agency shall review and approve the plan in accordance with its ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774, so long as the plan satisfies the requirements of this subdivision, and so notify the operator in writing. Otherwise, the lead agency shall notify the operator in writing of any deficiencies in the plan. The operator shall have 30 days, or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the operator and the lead agency, to submit a revised plan.
(5)The lead agency shall approve or deny approval of the revised interim management plan within 60 days of receipt. If the lead agency denies approval of the revised interim management plan, the operator may appeal that action to the lead agencys governing body, which shall schedule a public hearing within 45 days of the filing of the appeal or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the operator and the governing body.
(6)Unless review of an interim management plan is pending before the lead agency or an appeal is pending before the lead agencys governing body, a surface mining operation that remains idle for over one year after becoming idle, as defined in Section 2727.1, without obtaining approval of an interim management plan shall be considered abandoned and the operator shall commence and complete reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan.
(i)An enforcement action that may be brought against a surface mining operation for operating without an approved reclamation plan, financial assurance, or interim management plan shall be held in abeyance pending review pursuant to subdivision (b) or (h), or the resolution of an appeal filed with the board pursuant to subdivision (e), or with a lead agency governing body pursuant to subdivision (h).
SEC. 6.Section 2772 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2772.(a)The reclamation plan shall be filed with the lead agency, on a form provided by the lead agency, by any person who owns, leases, or otherwise controls or operates on all or any portion of any mined lands and who plans to conduct surface mining operations on the lands.
(b)The reclamation plan shall include a chart identifying the page number, chapter, appendix, or other specific location in the reclamation plan where content meeting the requirements, as applicable, of Sections 2772, 2773, and 2773.3 and Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) and Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, is located.
(c)The reclamation plan shall include all of the following information and documents:
(1)The name and address of the operator and the names and addresses of any persons designated by the operator as an agent for the service of process.
(2)The anticipated quantity and type of minerals for which the surface mining operation is to be conducted.
(3)The proposed dates for the initiation and termination of the surface mining operation.
(4)The maximum anticipated depth of the surface mining operation.
(5)A reclamation plan map or maps that shall include all of the following:
(A)Size and legal description of the lands that will be affected by the surface mining operation and the names and addresses of the owners of all surface interests and mineral interests in the lands.
(B)Clearly defined and accurately drawn property lines, setbacks, and the reclamation plan boundary.
(C)Existing topography and final topography depicted with contour lines drawn at appropriate intervals for the sites conditions.
(D)Detailed geologic description of the area of the surface mining operation.
(E)Location of railroads, utility facilities, access roads, temporary roads to be reclaimed, and any roads remaining for the approved end use.
(F)All maps, diagrams, or calculations that require preparation in accordance with the Professional Engineers Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 6700) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code), the Geologist and Geophysicist Act (Chapter 12.5 (commencing with Section 7800) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code), or the Professional Land Surveyors Act (Chapter 15 (commencing with Section 8700) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) shall be prepared by a California-licensed professional, shall include his or her license number and name, and shall bear the signature and seal of the licensee.
(6)A description of and a plan for the type of surface mining to be employed and a time schedule that will provide for the completion of surface mining on each segment of the mined lands so that reclamation can be initiated at the earliest possible time on those portions of the mined lands that will not be subject to further disturbance by the surface mining operation.
(7)A description of the proposed use or potential uses of the mined lands after reclamation and evidence that all owners of a possessory interest in the land have been notified of the proposed use or potential uses.
(8)A description of the manner in which reclamation, adequate for the proposed use or potential uses, will be accomplished, including both of the following:
(A)A description of the manner in which known contaminants will be controlled and mining waste will be disposed.
(B)A description of the manner in which affected streambed channels and streambanks will be rehabilitated to a condition that minimizes erosion and sedimentation.
(9)An assessment of the effect of implementation of the reclamation plan on future mining in the area.
(10)A statement that the person submitting the reclamation plan accepts responsibility for reclaiming the mined lands in accordance with the reclamation plan.
(11)Any other information that the lead agency may require by ordinance.
(d)An item of information or a document required pursuant to subdivision (c) that has already been prepared as part of a permit application for the surface mining operation or as part of an environmental document prepared for the project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) may be included in the reclamation plan by reference, if that item of information or that document is attached to the reclamation plan when the lead agency submits the reclamation plan to the director for review. To the extent the information, document, or component of a document referenced in the reclamation plan is used to meet the requirements of subdivision (c) or Section 2773 or 2773.3, the information, document, or component of a document shall become part of the reclamation plan and shall be subject to all other requirements of this article.
(e)Nothing in this section is intended to limit or expand the departments authority or responsibility to review a document in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
SEC. 7.Section 2772.1 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2772.1.(a)(1)Prior to approving a surface mining operations reclamation plan or plan amendment, the lead agency shall submit the reclamation plan or plan amendment to the director for review. The reclamation plan or plan amendment shall be submitted to the director as early as practicable in order to facilitate the lead agencys review of the reclamation plan pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)). All documentation for the submission shall be submitted to the director at one time.
(2)An item of information, document, or component of a document that has been prepared as part of a permit application for the surface mining operation or as part of an environmental document prepared for the project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) shall be incorporated into the reclamation plan or plan amendment if it is used to satisfy the requirements of subdivision (c) of Section 2772, Sections 2773 and 2773.3, and Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) and Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, as applicable. If an item of information, document, or component of a document is incorporated, reference to the item shall be added to the chart required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2772 and shall be properly indexed with the corresponding appendix reference and page numbers, if applicable. The item shall be included in an appendix to and shall become part of the reclamation plan or plan amendment.
(3)The lead agency shall certify to the director that the reclamation plan or plan amendment is a complete submission and is in compliance with all of the following:
(A)The applicable requirements of this chapter.
(B)Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) and Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, as applicable.
(C)The lead agencys surface mining ordinance in effect at the time that the reclamation plan or plan amendment is submitted to the director for review, except if the board is the lead agency.
(b)(1)The director shall have 30 days from the receipt of a reclamation plan or plan amendment to notify the lead agency and operator if the submission is incomplete. An incomplete submission is one that does not meet the content requirements of Sections 2772, 2773, and 2773.3 and Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) and Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, as applicable. The directors notice shall specifically identify all aspects of the submission that are incomplete.
(2)The director shall have 30 days after the date the director is required to notify the lead agency if the submission is incomplete to prepare written comments on the reclamation plan or plan amendment if the director chooses.
(3)If the director has issued a notice of incomplete submission pursuant to paragraph (1), the directors time to prepare written comments on the reclamation plan or plan amendment shall not commence until the director receives each item identified in the notice. The directors time shall include any remaining time pursuant to paragraph (1) and the time allowed pursuant to paragraph (2).
(4)The lead agency shall review and evaluate written comments received from the director relating to the reclamation plan or plan amendment within a reasonable amount of time.
(5)(A)The lead agency shall prepare a written response to the directors comments received pursuant to paragraph (2) describing the disposition of the major issues raised by the comments. The lead agency shall submit its response to the director at least 30 days prior to the intended approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment. The lead agencys response shall include either of the following:
(i)A description of how the lead agency proposes to adopt the directors comments to the reclamation plan or plan amendment.
(ii)A detailed description of the reasons why the lead agency proposes not to adopt the directors comments.
(B)Copies of any written comments received and responses prepared by the lead agency pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be forwarded to the operator.
(6)(A)The lead agency shall give the director at least 30 days notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing at which the reclamation plan or plan amendment is scheduled to be approved by the lead agency.
(B)If no hearing is required by this chapter, the local ordinance, or other state law, the lead agency shall provide 30 days notice to the director that the lead agency intends to approve the reclamation plan or plan amendment.
(7)(A)Within 30 days following the approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment, the lead agency shall provide the director notice of the approval. During that period, the department retains all powers, duties, and authorities of this chapter. The lead agency shall provide, as soon as practicable but no later than 60 days after approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment, certified copies of all maps, diagrams, or calculations, signed and sealed.
(B)No later than 60 days after the approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment, the lead agency shall provide to the director an official copy of the approved reclamation plan or plan amendment. The official copy shall incorporate all approved modifications to the reclamation plan or plan amendment and shall include an index showing any permit conditions of approval or binding mitigation measures adopted or certified pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) that are necessary to meet the requirements of subdivision (c) of Section 2772, Sections 2773 and 2773.3, and Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) and Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, as applicable. Those conditions of approval and mitigation measures shall be included in an appendix to the reclamation plan or plan amendment and shall be considered part of the reclamation compliance requirements and subject to the annual inspection requirements.
(c)To the extent there is a conflict between the comments of a trustee agency or a responsible agency that are based on that agencys statutory or regulatory authority and the comments of other commenting agencies that are received by the lead agency pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) regarding a reclamation plan or plan amendments, the lead agency shall consider only the comments of the trustee agency or responsible agency.
(d)Nothing in this section is intended to limit or expand the departments authority or responsibility to review a document in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
SEC. 8.Section 2773.1 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2773.1.(a)Lead agencies shall require financial assurances of each surface mining operation to ensure reclamation is performed in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan, as follows:
(1)A financial assurance mechanism may take the form of surety bonds executed by an admitted surety insurer, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 995.120 of the Code of Civil Procedure, irrevocable letters of credit, trust funds, or other forms of financial assurances specified by the board pursuant to subdivision (e) that the lead agency reasonably determines are adequate to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan.
(2)The financial assurances shall remain in effect for the duration of the surface mining operation and any additional period until reclamation is completed.
(3)The amount of financial assurances required of a surface mining operation for any one year shall be reviewed and, if necessary, adjusted once each calendar year to account for new lands disturbed by surface mining operations, inflation, and reclamation of lands accomplished in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. An operator shall be required to replace an approved financial assurance mechanism to bond for the reclamation of the surface mining operation only if the financial assurance cost estimate identifies a need to increase the amount of the financial assurance mechanism.
(4)Financial assurance cost estimates shall be submitted to the lead agency for review on a form developed by the director and approved by the board. The form shall be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code).
(5)Each financial assurance mechanism shall be made payable to the lead agency and the department. A financial assurance mechanism shall not be released without the consent of the lead agency and the department. A financial assurance mechanism that was approved by the lead agency prior to January 1, 1993, and was made payable to the State Geologist shall be considered payable to the department for purposes of this chapter. However, if a surface mining operation has received approval of its financial assurances from a public agency other than the lead agency, the lead agency shall deem those financial assurances adequate for purposes of this section, or shall credit them toward fulfillment of the financial assurances required by this section, if they are made payable to the public agency, the lead agency, and the department and otherwise meet the requirements of this section. In any event, if a lead agency and one or more public agencies exercise jurisdiction over a surface mining operation, the total amount of financial assurances required by the lead agency and the public agencies for any one year shall not exceed that amount that is necessary to perform reclamation of lands remaining disturbed. For purposes of this paragraph, a public agency may include a federal agency.
(b)(1)If the lead agency, or the board when acting as a lead agency, has evidence that an operator may be financially incapable of completing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan or that the operator may have abandoned the surface mining operation without completing reclamation, the lead agency or the board, when acting as a lead agency, shall conduct a public hearing to determine whether the operator is financially capable of completing reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan or has abandoned the surface mining operation. The hearing shall be noticed to the operator and the director at least 30 days prior to the hearing.
(2)If the lead agency or the board, following the public hearing conducted pursuant to paragraph (1), determines that the operator is financially incapable of performing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan or has abandoned its surface mining operation without completing reclamation, either the lead agency or the director shall do all of the following:
(A)Notify the operator by personal service or certified mail that the lead agency or the director intends to take appropriate action to forfeit the financial assurances and specify the reasons for so doing.
(B)Proceed to take appropriate action to require forfeiture of the financial assurances.
(C)Use the proceeds from the forfeited financial assurances to conduct and complete reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. If the surface mining operation cannot be reclaimed in accordance with its approved reclamation plan, or the financial assurances are inadequate to reclaim in accordance with its approved reclamation plan, the lead agency or director may use forfeited financial assurances to reclaim or remediate mining disturbances as appropriate for the site conditions as determined by both the lead agency and the director. The financial assurances shall not be used for any other purpose. The operator is responsible for the costs of conducting and completing reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan or a remediation plan developed pursuant to this section as determined appropriate by both the lead agency and the director that are in excess of the proceeds from the forfeited financial assurances.
(c)Financial assurances shall no longer be required of a surface mining operation, and shall be released, upon the written concurrence of the lead agency and the director, which shall be forwarded to the operator and the institutions providing or holding the financial assurance mechanism, that reclamation has been completed in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. If a surface mining operation is sold or ownership is transferred to another person, the existing financial assurances shall remain in force and shall not be released by the lead agency and the director until new financial assurances are secured from the new owner and have been approved by the lead agency in accordance with Sections 2770, 2773.1, and 2773.4. Within 90 days of the sale or transfer of a surface mining operation, the new operator shall submit an appropriate financial assurance mechanism, which may be the existing mechanism if the existing mechanism is payable in the event of the new operators financial incapability or abandonment of the surface mining operation, that is subject to review by the lead agency and the director pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2773.4. Within 15 days of the sale or transfer of a surface mining operation, the new operator shall sign a new statement of reclamation responsibility in accordance with paragraph (10) of subdivision (c) of Section 2772.
(d)The lead agency shall have primary responsibility to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and to reclaim mine sites pursuant to subdivision (b). However, if the board is not the lead agency pursuant to Section 2774.4, the director may act to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and reclaim mine sites pursuant to subdivision (b) only if both of the following occurs:
(1)The financial incapability of the operator or the abandonment of the surface mining operation has come to the attention of the director.
(2)The lead agency has been notified in writing by the director of the financial incapability of the operator or the abandonment of the surface mining operation for at least 15 days, the lead agency has not taken appropriate measures to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances and reclaim the mine site, and one of the following has occurred:
(A)The lead agency has been notified in writing by the director that failure to take appropriate measures to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances or to reclaim the mine site shall result in actions being taken against the lead agency under Section 2774.4.
(B)The director determines that there is a violation that amounts to an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health, safety, or to the environment.
(C)The lead agency notifies the director in writing that its good faith attempts to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances have not been successful.
The director shall comply with subdivision (b) in seeking forfeiture of financial assurances and reclaiming mine sites.
(e)The board may adopt regulations specifying financial assurance mechanisms other than surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, and trust funds, which the board determines are reasonably available and adequate to ensure reclamation pursuant to this chapter, but these mechanisms shall not include financial tests or surety bonds executed by one or more personal sureties. These mechanisms may include reclamation bond pool programs.
(f)The board shall adopt or revise guidelines to implement this section as necessary. The guidelines are exempt from the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code), and are not subject to review by the Office of Administrative Law.
SEC. 9.Section 2773.4 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2773.4.(a)(1)Prior to approving the financial assurances for a new reclamation plan or adjustments to financial assurances based on an amendment to a reclamation plan, the lead agency shall submit the financial assurance cost estimate to the director for review.
(2)The lead agency shall provide the director with a determination that the financial assurance cost estimate submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) is adequate, complete, and consistent with Section 2773.1, Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and the boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1.
(3)All documentation submitted to the director pursuant to this subdivision shall be submitted at one time.
(b)No later than 15 days after receiving a financial assurance cost estimate, the director shall notify the lead agency and the operator if the submission is incomplete. An incomplete submission is one that does not meet the content requirements of Section 2773.1, Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and the boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1. The directors notice shall specifically identify all aspects of the submission that are incomplete. The directors time to review the financial assurance cost estimate shall commence upon the receipt of a submission that contains the aspects identified in the directors notice to the lead agency.
(c)(1)The director shall have 45 days from the date of receipt of a complete financial assurance cost estimate to prepare written comments if the director chooses.
(2)The lead agency shall evaluate written comments received from the director relating to the financial assurance cost estimate within a reasonable amount of time. The lead agency shall prepare a written response to the directors comments describing the disposition of the major issues raised by the directors comments.
(3)The lead agency shall submit its proposed response to the director at least 30 days prior to approval of the financial assurance cost estimate. The lead agencys response shall include either of the following:
(A)A description of how the lead agency proposes to adopt the directors comments to the financial assurance cost estimate.
(B)A detailed description of the reasons why the lead agency proposes to not adopt the directors comments.
(4)Copies of any written comments received and responses prepared by the lead agency shall be forwarded to the operator.
(5)(A)If the lead agency, in its written response to the directors comments, proposes to not adopt the directors comments relating to the financial assurance cost estimate, the director, within 15 days of receipt of the lead agencys written response, may request in writing a consultation with the lead agency to discuss the directors comments and the lead agencys response. The request shall include an invitation to the operator to participate in the consultation. The consultation may be conducted in person, electronically, telephonically, or by any means convenient to the parties.
(B)If the director requests a consultation pursuant to this subdivision, the lead agency shall not approve the financial assurance cost estimate until after consulting with the director. The consultation shall occur not later than 30 days after the directors request unless an alternate timeframe is mutually agreed upon by the director, lead agency, and operator.
(6)(A)The lead agency shall give the director at least 30 days notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing at which the financial assurance cost estimate is scheduled to be approved by the lead agency. If no hearing is required by this chapter, local ordinance, or other state law, then the lead agency shall provide 30 days notice to the director that it intends to approve the financial assurance cost estimate.
(B)The lead agency shall send to the director its final response to the directors comments within 30 days following its approval of the financial assurance cost estimate, during which time the department retains all of its powers, duties, and authority pursuant to this chapter.
(d)(1)(A)Within 30 days of an annual inspection being conducted pursuant to Section 2774, an operator shall provide an annual financial assurance cost estimate to the lead agency for review.
(B)If the lead agency fails to cause the inspection of the surface mining operation on the date requested by the operator pursuant to Section 2207 or on the date set by the lead agency pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774, the operator shall provide an annual financial assurance cost estimate to the lead agency for review within 30 days of the applicable inspection date, unless the lead agency causes the inspection to occur within that time period, in which case the operator shall provide an annual financial assurance cost estimate to the lead agency within 30 days of the date of the inspection.
(2)(A)Within 60 days of receiving an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate, the lead agency shall do one of the following:
(i)Deny the financial assurance cost estimate pursuant to paragraph (6).
(ii)Submit the financial assurance cost estimate to the director for review.
(B)The lead agency shall provide the director with a determination that the annual financial assurance cost estimate submitted is adequate, complete, and consistent with Section 2773.1, Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and the boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1.
(3)All documentation submitted to the director pursuant to this subdivision shall be submitted at one time.
(4)Within 15 days of receiving an annual financial assurance cost estimate, the director shall notify the lead agency and the operator if the submission is incomplete. An incomplete submission is one that does not meet the content requirements of Section 2773.1, Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and the boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1. The directors notice shall specifically identify all aspects of the submission that are incomplete. The directors time to review the annual financial assurance cost estimate shall commence upon the receipt of a submission that contains the aspects identified in the directors notice to the lead agency.
(5)(A)Within 45 days of receiving an operators complete annual financial assurance cost estimate from the lead agency, the director shall prepare written comments on the operators annual financial assurance cost estimate and provide the comments to the lead agency and the operator if the director so chooses.
(B)(i)Within 30 days from receiving the directors written comments pursuant to this subdivision, the lead agency shall evaluate the written comments and provide the director and operator its proposed response to the director.
(ii)The lead agency shall submit its proposed response to the director at least 30 days prior to approving the annual financial assurance cost estimate. The lead agencys response shall include either of the following:
(I)A description of how the lead agency proposes to adopt the directors comments to the annual financial assurance cost estimate.
(II)A detailed description of the reasons why the lead agency proposes not to adopt the directors comments.
(iii)Copies of any written comments received and responses prepared by the lead agency pursuant to this subparagraph shall be provided to the operator.
(C)(i)If the lead agency, in its written response to the directors comments, proposes to not adopt the directors comments concerning the annual financial assurance cost estimate, the director, within 15 days of receipt of the lead agencys written response, may request in writing a consultation with the lead agency to discuss the directors comments and the lead agencys response. The request shall include an invitation to the operator to participate in the consultation. The consultation may be conducted in person, electronically, telephonically, or by any means convenient to the parties.
(ii)If the director requests a consultation pursuant to this subparagraph, the lead agency shall not approve the annual financial assurance cost estimate until after consulting with the director. The consultation shall occur not later than 30 days after the directors request unless an alternate timeframe is mutually agreed upon by the director, lead agency, and operator.
(D)(i)Within 60 days of receiving the directors written comments, or of a consultation pursuant to this subdivision, whichever is later or the due date of the directors written comments if none are received, the lead agency shall approve or deny an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate.
(ii)The lead agency shall give the director at least 30 days notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing at which the annual financial assurance cost estimate is scheduled to be approved by the lead agency.
(iii)If no hearing is required by this chapter, local ordinance, or other state law, the lead agency shall provide 30 days notice to the director that it intends to approve the annual financial assurance cost estimate.
(E)Within 30 days of the lead agencys approval of the annual financial assurance cost estimate, the lead agency shall send the director its final response to the directors comments.
(6)If the lead agency determines an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate is inadequate, the lead agency shall specify the reasons for that determination. The operator shall have 30 days to appeal that denial pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2770 or provide a revised financial assurance cost estimate incorporating the suggested changes to the lead agency for approval by the lead agency pursuant to this section.
(e)(1)Within 30 days of the lead agencys approval of a financial assurance cost estimate pursuant to this section, the operator shall provide the lead agency and the director an appropriate financial assurance mechanism.
(2)(A)Within 15 days of receiving a financial assurance mechanism pursuant to this subdivision, or subdivision (c) of Section 2773.1 the lead agency and the director shall review the financial assurance mechanism to determine if the type of mechanism, including the release instructions, meets the requirements of this chapter.
(B)Financial assurance mechanisms determined to be noncompliant with this chapter shall be returned to the operator with instructions on how to correct the type or release instructions of the financial assurance mechanism.
(3)By July 1, 2018, the board shall adopt forms to implement this subdivision as necessary. The forms shall be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code).
(f)The review and approval of financial assurances pursuant to this chapter shall not be considered a project for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
SEC. 10.Section 2774 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.(a)Every lead agency shall adopt ordinances in accordance with state policy that establish procedures for the review and approval of reclamation plans and financial assurances and the issuance of a permit to conduct surface mining operations, except that any lead agency without an active surface mining operation in its jurisdiction may defer adopting an implementing ordinance until the filing of a permit application. The ordinances shall establish procedures requiring at least one public hearing and shall be periodically reviewed by the lead agency and revised, as necessary, to ensure that the ordinances continue to be in accordance with state policy.
(b)(1)The lead agency shall cause surface mining operations to be inspected in intervals of no more than 12 months, solely to determine whether the surface mining operation is in compliance with this chapter. The lead agency shall cause an inspection to be conducted by a state-licensed geologist, state-licensed civil engineer, state-licensed landscape architect, state-licensed forester, or a qualified lead agency employee who has not been employed by the surface mining operation being inspected in any capacity during the previous 12 months, except that a qualified lead agency employee may inspect surface mining operations conducted by the local agency. All inspections shall be conducted using a form developed by the department and approved by the board that includes the professional licensing and disciplinary information of the person who conducted the inspection. The operator shall be solely responsible for the reasonable cost of the inspection. The lead agency shall provide a notice of completion of inspection to the director within 90 days of conducting the inspection. The notice shall contain a statement regarding the surface mining operations compliance with this chapter and a copy of the completed inspection form, and shall specify, as applicable, all of the following:
(A)Aspects of the surface mining operation, if any, that were found to be inconsistent with this chapter but were corrected before the submission of the inspection form to the director.
(B)Aspects of the surface mining operation, if any, that were found to be inconsistent with this chapter but were not corrected before the submission of the inspection form to the director.
(C)A statement describing the lead agencys intended response to any aspects of the surface mining operation found to be inconsistent with this chapter but were not corrected before the submission of the inspection form to the director.
(2)If the surface mining operation has a review of its reclamation plan, financial assurances, or an interim management plan pending under subdivision (b) or (h) of Section 2770, or an appeal pending before the board or lead agency governing body under subdivision (e) or (h) of Section 2770, the notice shall so indicate. The lead agency shall forward to the operator a copy of the notice, a copy of the completed inspection form, and any supporting documentation, including, but not limited to, any inspection report prepared by the geologist, civil engineer, landscape architect, forester, or qualified lead agency employee who conducted the inspection.
(c)If an operator does not request an inspection date on the annual report filed pursuant to Section 2207 or if the lead agency is unable to cause the inspection of a given surface mining operation on the date requested by the operator, the lead agency shall provide the operator with a minimum of five days written notice of a pending inspection or a lesser time period if agreed to by the operator.
(d)No later than July 1 of each year, the lead agency shall submit to the director for each active or idle surface mining operation within the lead agencys jurisdiction the following information:
(1)A copy of any permit or reclamation plan amendments, as applicable.
(2)A statement that there have been no changes during the previous year, as applicable.
(3)The date of each surface mining operations last inspection.
(4)The date of each surface mining operations last financial assurance review pursuant to Section 2773.1 for each operation listed.
(e)(1)No later than December 31, 2017, the department shall establish a training program for all surface mine inspectors. The program shall be designed to include a guidance document, developed by the department, in consultation with the board and stakeholders, to provide instruction and recommendations to surface mine inspectors performing inspections pursuant to subdivision (b).
(2)The training program shall include inspection workshops offered by the department in different regions of the state to provide practical application of the guidance document material.
(3)On and after July 1, 2020, all inspectors shall have on file with the lead agency and the department a certificate of completion of an inspection workshop. An inspector shall attend a workshop no later than five years after the date of his or her most recent certificate.
(4)The adoption of the guidance document by the department pursuant to this subdivision shall be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code).
SEC. 11.Section 2774.1 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.1.(a)(1)Except as provided in subdivision (i) of Section 2770, if the lead agency or the director determines, based upon an annual inspection pursuant to Section 2774, or otherwise confirmed by an inspection of the surface mining operation, that a surface mining operation is not in compliance with this chapter, the lead agency or the director may issue a notice of that violation to the operator by personal service or certified mail. If the lead agency issues the notice, the lead agency shall send a copy of the notice to the director. The notice shall include both of the following:
(A)A description of the violation.
(B)Actions the operator shall take to correct the violation.
(2)(A)If a lead agency or the director determines that the time to correct the noticed violation will exceed 30 days, the lead agency and the operator may enter into a stipulated order to comply, with notice sent to the director. If the director initiated the enforcement action, the director, after consulting with the lead agency, may enter into a stipulated order to comply with the operator. The lead agency may, but need not, join the stipulated order with the director.
(B)A stipulated order to comply shall include a schedule and time for compliance that the lead agency or the director, as applicable, determines is reasonable after taking into account the actions and legal processes required to correct the violation.
(3)(A)If the operator does not comply with a notice issued pursuant to paragraph (1) within 30 days of being served the notice or commit to enter into a stipulated order to comply pursuant to paragraph (2) within 30 days of being served the notice, the lead agency or the director may issue an order to comply by personal service or certified mail requiring the operator to comply with this chapter or, if the operator does not have an approved reclamation plan or financial assurances, cease all further surface mining activities.
(B)An order to comply issued pursuant to this paragraph shall take effect 30 days following the service of the order to comply unless within those 30 days the operator appeals the order to comply and requests a hearing before the lead agency, if the lead agency issued the order, or the board, if the director issued the order. An order to comply issued pursuant to this paragraph shall specify all of the following:
(i)Which aspects of the surface mining operation are inconsistent with this chapter.
(ii)A time for compliance that the lead agency or director determines is reasonable, taking into account the seriousness of the alleged violation and any good faith efforts to comply with applicable requirements.
(iii)The actions and legal processes required to correct the alleged violation.
(C)An appeal filed pursuant to subparagraph (B) shall be noticed and heard at a public hearing within 45 days of the filing of the appeal or a longer period as may be mutually agreed upon by the operator and the lead agency, if the lead agency issued the order, or the operator and the director, if the director issued the order.
(b)[Reserved]
(c)An operator who violates or fails to comply with an order to comply issued under subdivision (a) after the orders effective date or who fails to submit a report or pay annual fees to the director or lead agency as required by Section 2207, shall be subject to an order by the lead agency or the director imposing an administrative penalty of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) per day, assessed from the original date of noncompliance with this chapter, including Section 2207, or from the date of the inspection when the violation was identified, at the discretion of the issuer of the notice of that violation. The penalty may be imposed administratively by the lead agency or the director. In determining the amount of the administrative penalty, the lead agency or the director shall take into consideration the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation or violations, any prior history of violations, the degree of culpability, economic savings, if any, resulting from the violation, and any other matters justice may require. Orders setting administrative penalties shall become effective upon issuance of the assessment and payment shall be made to the lead agency or the director within 30 days, unless the operator petitions the legislative body of the lead agency, the board, or the superior court for review as provided in Section 2774.2. An order shall be served by personal service or by certified mail upon the operator. Penalties collected by the director shall not be used for purposes other than to cover the reasonable costs incurred by the director in implementing this chapter or Section 2207.
(d)(1)An operator who violates or fails to comply with an order to comply issued pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) or a stipulated order to comply entered into pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) after the orders effective date shall be removed from the list published by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2717.
(2)If after a public hearing the board or lead agency denies an appeal by the operator pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), the operator shall be removed 10 working days following the denial of the appeal from the list published by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2717.
(3)If the operator enters into a stipulated order to comply between the operator and the lead agency, if the lead agency issued the order, or the operator and the director, if the director issued the order, within 10 working days of the denial of the appeal and the stipulated order to comply is consistent with the order to comply upheld by the board or lead agency and includes a stipulated schedule for compliance, the operator shall remain on the list published by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2717.
(4)Issuance of a notice pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) or an order to comply or stipulated order to comply pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (a) shall not disqualify an operator from eligibility for placement on the list published by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2717.
(e)If the lead agency or the director determines that the surface mine is not in compliance with this chapter, so that the surface mine presents an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or the environment, the lead agency or the Attorney General, on behalf of the director, may seek an order from a court of competent jurisdiction enjoining that operation.
(f)Upon a complaint by the director, the department, or the board, the Attorney General may bring an action to recover administrative penalties under this section, and penalties under Section 2207, in any court of competent jurisdiction in this state against any person violating any provision of this chapter or Section 2207, or any regulation adopted pursuant to this chapter or Section 2207. The Attorney General may bring this action on his or her own initiative if, after examining the complaint and the evidence, he or she believes a violation has occurred. The Attorney General may also seek an order from a court of competent jurisdiction compelling the operator to comply with this chapter and Section 2207.
(g)(1)The lead agency has primary responsibility for enforcing this chapter and Section 2207. In cases where the board is not the lead agency pursuant to Section 2774.4, enforcement actions may be initiated by the director pursuant to this section only after the violation has come to the attention of the director and either of the following occurs:
(A)The lead agency has been notified by the director in writing of the violation for at least 30 days, and has not taken appropriate enforcement action, which may include failing to issue an order to comply within a reasonable time after issuing a notice of violation.
(B)The director determines that there is a violation that amounts to an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or safety, or to the environment.
(2)The director shall comply with this section in initiating enforcement actions.
(h)Remedies under this section are in addition to, and do not supersede or limit, any and all other remedies, civil or criminal.
SEC. 12.Section 2774.2 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.2.(a)Within 30 days of the issuance of an order setting administrative penalties under subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1, the operator may petition the legislative body of the lead agency, if the lead agency has issued the order, or the board for orders issued by the director, for review of the order. If the operator does not petition for review within the time limits set by this subdivision, the order setting administrative penalties shall not be subject to review by any court or agency.
(b)The legislative body of the lead agency or the board shall notify the operator by personal service or certified mail whether it will review the order setting administrative penalties. In reviewing an order pursuant to this section, the record shall consist of the record before the lead agency or the director and any other relevant evidence which, in the judgment of the legislative body or the board, should be considered to effectuate and implement the policies of this chapter.
(c)The legislative body or the board may affirm, modify, or set aside, in whole or in part, by its own order an order of the lead agency or the director setting administrative penalties reviewed by the legislative body or the board pursuant to this section.
(d)An order of the legislative body or the board issued under subdivision (c) shall become effective upon its issuance unless the operator petitions the superior court for review as provided in subdivision (e). An order shall be served by personal service or by certified mail upon the operator. Payment of an administrative penalty that is specified in an order issued pursuant to subdivision (c) shall be made to the lead agency or the director within 30 days of service of the order. However, the payment shall be held in an interest bearing impound account pending the resolution of a petition for review filed pursuant to subdivision (e).
(e)An operator aggrieved by an order of the legislative body or the board issued pursuant to subdivision (c) may obtain review of the order by filing in the superior court a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days following the issuance of the order. An operator aggrieved by an order of a lead agency or the director setting administrative penalties pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1, for which the legislative body or board denies review, may obtain review of the order in the superior court by filing in the court a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days following the denial of review. The provisions of Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall govern judicial proceedings pursuant to this subdivision, except that in every case the court shall exercise its independent judgment. If the operator does not petition for a writ of mandate within the time limits set by this subdivision, an order of the board or the legislative body shall not be subject to review by any court or agency.
(f)(1)After the expiration of the time to petition for review pursuant to subdivision (a) or (e), the director or the board acting as the lead agency may apply to the small claims court or the superior court, depending on the jurisdictional amount, in the county where the administrative penalty was imposed for a judgment to collect the unpaid administrative penalty imposed pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1. The application shall include all of the following:
(A)The order setting the administrative penalty pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1.
(B)A notice to the operator of the right to petition for review of the order.
(C)Either of the following:
(i)A declaration from the board that no petition was made or that the board declined to review the petition.
(ii)A copy of the final order of the board.
(2)An application submitted pursuant to this subdivision shall constitute a sufficient showing to warrant the issuance of the judgment. The court clerk shall enter the judgment immediately in conformity with the application.
(3)The judgment entered pursuant to this subdivision shall have the same force and effect as, and shall be subject to all the provisions of law relating to, a judgment in a civil action and may be enforced in the same manner as any other judgment of the court. The court shall make enforcement of the judgment a priority.
SEC. 13.Section 2774.4 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.4.(a)The board shall exercise some or all of a lead agencys powers under this chapter pursuant to subdivision (c), except for permitting authority and vested rights determinations, if the board finds that a lead agency has done any of the following:
(1)Approved reclamation plans or financial assurances that are not consistent with this chapter.
(2)Failed to inspect or cause the inspection of surface mining operations as required by this chapter.
(3)Failed to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and to carry out reclamation of surface mining operations as required by this chapter.
(4)Failed to take appropriate enforcement actions as required by this chapter.
(5)Intentionally misrepresented the results of inspections required under this chapter.
(6)Failed to submit information to the department as required by this chapter.
(b)The board shall conduct a public hearing no sooner than three years after the board has taken action pursuant to subdivision (a) to determine if a lead agency has corrected its deficiencies in implementing and enforcing this chapter and the rules and regulations adopted pursuant to this chapter. If the board finds the lead agency has corrected some or all of its deficiencies in implementing and enforcing this chapter, the board shall restore to the lead agency some or all of the powers assumed by the board pursuant to subdivision (a).
(c)(1)Before taking any action pursuant to subdivision (a), the board shall first notify the lead agency of the identified deficiencies and allow the lead agency 45 days to provide a response to the board on the identified deficiencies. The board may review the lead agencys response at a regularly scheduled meeting.
(2)(A)If the board is not satisfied with the lead agencys response, the board shall hold a public hearing within the lead agencys area of jurisdiction, upon a 45-day written notice given to the public in at least one newspaper of general circulation within the city or county and directly mailed to the lead agency and to all operators within the lead agencys jurisdiction who have submitted reports as required by Section 2207.
(B)At the hearing, the board shall determine if the lead agency has engaged in the conduct described in subdivision (a). If the board finds that the lead agency has engaged in conduct described in subdivision (a), the board shall do either of the following:
(i)Require the lead agency to develop a remedial plan to correct the noted deficiencies. The remedial plan shall describe specific objectives and corresponding processes designed to address, at a minimum, the noted deficiencies and a time that the remedial plan will be fully implemented. The board shall set a hearing to review the completion of the remedial plan consistent with paragraph (2) and subdivisions (d) and (e).
(ii)Take immediate action pursuant to subdivision (a).
(d)Affected operators and interested persons have the right at the public hearing to present oral and written evidence on the matter being considered. At the public hearing, the board may place reasonable limits on the right of affected operators and interested persons to question and solicit testimony.
(e)(1)If the board decides to take action pursuant to subdivision (a) and exercise some or all of a lead agencys powers under this chapter, except for permitting authority and vested rights determinations, the board, based on the record of the public hearing, shall adopt written findings that explain all of the following:
(A)The action to be taken by the board.
(B)Why the board decided to take the action.
(C)Why the action is authorized by and meets the requirements of subdivision (a).
(2)In addition, the boards findings shall address the significant issues raised, or written evidence presented, by affected operators, interested persons, the lead agency, or the department. The transcript of testimony and exhibits, together with all papers and requests filed in the proceedings, shall constitute the exclusive record for decision by the board.
(f)If the board finds at the hearing held pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) that the lead agency has not completed the remedial plan prepared pursuant to clause (i) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) to the boards satisfaction, the board shall follow the procedures set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) and subdivisions (d) and (e). If the board finds at the hearing held pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) that the lead agency has completed the remedial plan prepared pursuant to clause (i) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) to the boards satisfaction, the board shall conclude the action it has taken pursuant to this section.
(g)The lead agency, any affected operator, or any interested person who has presented oral or written evidence at the public hearing before the board pursuant to subdivision (d) may obtain review of the boards action taken pursuant to subdivision (a) by filing in the superior court a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days following the issuance of the boards decision. Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure governs judicial proceedings pursuant to this subdivision, except that in every case the court shall exercise its independent judgment. If a petition for a writ of mandate is not filed within the time limits set by this subdivision, the boards action under subdivision (a) shall not be subject to review by any court or agency.
SEC. 14.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
SEC. 15.This act shall become operative only if both this bill and Senate Bill 209 of the 201516 Regular Session are enacted and become operative on or before January 1, 2017.
(a)No later than December 31, 2021, the director shall report to the Legislature on the expenditure of moneys in the Mine Reclamation Account, created pursuant to Section 2207. The report shall include all of the following:
(1)An overview of how the moneys expended over the prior five fiscal years have been allocated between classification and designation of areas with mineral resources of statewide or regional significance, reclamation plan and financial assurance review, lead agency support and assistance, annual report processing, support for the board, enforcement, and any other activities that constituted more than 5 percent of expenditures.
(2)Information on the portion of the fees that have been collected from small construction aggregate providers with under 50,000 tons of production.
(3)Information on the percentage of the fees that have been paid by metallic mineral operations.
(b)This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2026, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2026, deletes or extends that date.
SEC. 2.Section 2715.5 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2715.5.(a)The Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, in conjunction with a site specific plan deemed consistent by the lead agency with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, until December 31, 2017, shall be considered to be a functional equivalent of a reclamation plan for the purposes of this chapter. No other reclamation plan shall be required to be reviewed and approved for any excavation project subject to the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan that is conducted in conformance with an approved site specific plan that is consistent with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan and the standards specified in that plan governing erosion control, channel stabilization, habitat restoration, flood control, or infrastructure maintenance, if that plan is reviewed and approved by a lead agency pursuant to this chapter.
(b)For the purposes of this section, the board of supervisors of the county in which the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan is to be implemented shall prepare and file the annual report required to be prepared pursuant to Section 2207.
(c)Nothing in this section precludes an enforcement action by the board or the department brought pursuant to this chapter or Section 2207 if the lead agency or the director determines that a surface mining operator, acting under the authority of the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, is not in compliance with the requirements of this chapter or Section 2207.
(d)For purposes of this section, site specific plan means an individual project plan approved by the lead agency that is consistent with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan. Site specific plans prepared in conformance with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan shall include, at a minimum, the information required pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2772, shall comply with the requirements of Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and shall be provided along with a financial assurance estimate to the department for review and comment pursuant to Section 2772.1 or 2773.4, as applicable. Notwithstanding the number of days authorized by subdivision (b) of Section 2772.1 or subdivision (c) of Section 2773.4, the department shall review the site specific plan and the financial assurance estimate and prepare any written comments within 15 days from the date of receipt of the plan and the estimate.
(e)Prior to engaging in an excavation activity in conformance with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, a surface mining operation shall be required to obtain financial assurances that meet the requirements of Section 2773.1.
(f)This section shall remain in effect only until December 31, 2017, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute that is enacted before December 31, 2017, deletes or extends that date.
SEC. 3.Section 2733 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2733.Reclamation means the combined process of land treatment that minimizes water degradation, air pollution, damage to aquatic or wildlife habitat, flooding, erosion, and other adverse effects from surface mining operations, including adverse surface effects incidental to underground mines, so that mined lands are reclaimed to a usable condition that is readily adaptable for alternate land uses and create no danger to public health or safety. The process may extend to affected lands surrounding mined lands, and may require backfilling, grading, resoiling, revegetation, soil compaction, slope stabilization, or other measures.
SEC. 4.Section 2736 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2736.Financial assurances means a current approved financial assurance cost estimate and a financial assurance mechanism that is at least equal to the current approved financial assurance cost estimate.
SEC. 5.Section 2770 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2770.(a)Except as provided in this section, a person shall not conduct surface mining operations unless a permit is obtained from, a reclamation plan has been submitted to and approved by, and financial assurances for reclamation have been approved by the lead agency for the operation pursuant to this article.
(b)A person with an existing surface mining operation who has vested rights pursuant to Section 2776 and who does not have an approved reclamation plan shall submit a reclamation plan to the lead agency not later than March 31, 1988. If a reclamation plan application is not on file by March 31, 1988, the continuation of the surface mining operation is prohibited until a reclamation plan is submitted to the lead agency. For the purposes of this subdivision, a reclamation plan existing prior to January 1, 2017, may consist of all or the appropriate sections of any plans or written agreements previously approved by the lead agency or another agency, together with any additional documents needed to substantially meet the requirements of Sections 2772 and 2773 and the lead agency surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774, provided that all documents, which together were proposed to serve as the reclamation plan, are submitted for approval to the lead agency in accordance with this chapter.
(c)[Reserved]
(d)[Reserved]
(e)(1)A person who can substantiate, based on the evidence of the record, that a lead agency has either (1) failed to act according to due process or has relied on considerations not related to the specific applicable requirements of Sections 2772, 2772.1, 2773, 2773.1, 2773.3, and 2773.4 and the lead agency surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774 in reaching a decision to deny approval of a reclamation plan or financial assurances for reclamation, or (2) failed to act within a reasonable time of receipt of a completed application may appeal that action or inaction to the board.
(2)The director may appeal a lead agencys approval of a financial assurance cost estimate to the board if the director has commented pursuant to Section 2773.4 that the financial assurance cost estimate is inadequate based on consideration of the following:
(A)Section 2773.1.
(B)Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
(C)The boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1
(3)If the approved financial assurance cost estimate applies to a reclamation plan approved for a new surface mining operation, an expanded surface mining operation, or an interim financial assurance due to an order to comply, stipulated or otherwise, the operator shall provide a financial assurance mechanism pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2773.4 in the amount of the approved financial assurance cost estimate, notwithstanding an appeal filed pursuant to this subdivision and subject to modification pending the outcome of the appeal.
(4)If the approved financial assurance cost estimate is an update to an existing approved financial assurance cost estimate, the existing financial assurance mechanism shall remain in place and shall not be adjusted until a final determination by the board on the appeal filed pursuant to this subdivision.
(f)(1)The board may decline to hear an appeal if it determines that the appeal raises no substantial issues related to the lead agencys decision to deny the approval of a reclamation plan or financial assurance, or the timeliness in reviewing a completed application. Appeals filed by the director shall be heard by the board.
(2)If the board takes up an appeal, the appeal shall be scheduled and heard at a public hearing within 45 days of the filing of the appeal, or a longer period as may be mutually agreed to by the board, the appellant, and the operator, or, if the appeal is filed by the director, by the board, the director, and the operator.
(g)(1)(A)When hearing an appeal filed pursuant to paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (e), the board shall determine whether the reclamation plan or the financial assurance cost estimate substantially meets the applicable requirements of Sections 2772, 2772.1, 2773, 2773.1, 2773.3, and 2773.4; Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500), Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700), and Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; and the lead agencys surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774. The board shall approve or uphold a reclamation plan or financial assurance cost estimate determined to meet those applicable requirements. In any event, financial assurances for reclamation shall be sufficient to perform reclamation of lands remaining disturbed.
(B)For purposes of this subdivision, substantially means actual compliance in respect to the substance and form requirements essential to the objectives of this chapter.
(2)(A)A reclamation plan determined not to meet the applicable requirements of Sections 2772, 2772.1, 2773, 2773.1, 2773.3, and 2773.4; Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500), Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700), and Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; and the lead agencys surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774 shall be returned to the operator with a notice of deficiencies. The operator shall be granted, once only, a period of 30 days or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the operator and the board to do both of the following:
(i)Correct the noted deficiencies.
(ii)Submit the revised reclamation plan to the lead agency for review and approval.
(B)Within 10 days of the hearing, the board shall provide notice via certified mail to the lead agency, the operator, and the department of the boards determination. The notice shall include instructions to the operator to submit to the lead agency for approval a revised reclamation plan consistent with the boards determination.
(3)(A)If the board determines the lead agencys approved financial assurance cost estimate does not meet the requirements of Sections 2773.1 and 2773.4, Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and the boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1, the board shall note the deficiencies and, based on the record, include adequate cost estimates for each noted deficiency.
(B)Within 10 days of the hearing, the board shall provide notice via certified mail to the lead agency, the operator, and the department of the boards determination with instructions to the operator to submit to the lead agency for approval a revised financial assurance cost estimate consistent with the boards determination. The instructions shall include a reasonable submission deadline of not less than 30 days.
(C)The lead agency shall approve the revised financial assurance cost estimate. That approval shall supersede and void the prior approved financial assurance cost estimate.
(D)A financial assurance mechanism shall be established by the operator pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2773.4 following the approval of the financial assurance cost estimate.
(E)The failure of the operator to submit to the lead agency a revised financial assurance cost estimate consistent with the boards determination and deadline may be grounds for the issuance of an order to comply pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774.1.
(h)(1)Within 90 days of a surface mining operation becoming idle, as defined in Section 2727.1, the operator shall submit to the lead agency for review and approval an interim management plan. The review and approval of an interim management plan shall not be considered a project for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)). The approved interim management plan shall be considered an amendment to the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan for purposes of this chapter. The interim management plan shall provide measures the operator will implement to maintain the site in compliance with this chapter, including, but not limited to, all permit conditions.
(2)The interim management plan may remain in effect for a period not to exceed five years, at which time the lead agency shall do one of the following:
(A)Renew the interim management plan for an additional period not to exceed five years, which may be renewed for one additional five-year renewal period at the expiration of the first five-year renewal period, if the lead agency finds that the surface mining operator has complied fully with the interim management plan.
(B)Require the operator to commence reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan.
(3)The financial assurances required by Section 2773.1 shall remain in effect during the period that the surface mining operation is idle. If the surface mining operation is still idle after the expiration of its interim management plan, the operator shall commence reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan.
(4)Within 60 days of the receipt of the interim management plan or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the lead agency and the operator, the lead agency shall review and approve the plan in accordance with its ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774, so long as the plan satisfies the requirements of this subdivision, and so notify the operator in writing. Otherwise, the lead agency shall notify the operator in writing of any deficiencies in the plan. The operator shall have 30 days, or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the operator and the lead agency, to submit a revised plan.
(5)The lead agency shall approve or deny approval of the revised interim management plan within 60 days of receipt. If the lead agency denies approval of the revised interim management plan, the operator may appeal that action to the lead agencys governing body, which shall schedule a public hearing within 45 days of the filing of the appeal or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the operator and the governing body.
(6)Unless review of an interim management plan is pending before the lead agency or an appeal is pending before the lead agencys governing body, a surface mining operation that remains idle for over one year after becoming idle, as defined in Section 2727.1, without obtaining approval of an interim management plan shall be considered abandoned and the operator shall commence and complete reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan.
(i)An enforcement action that may be brought against a surface mining operation for operating without an approved reclamation plan, financial assurance, or interim management plan shall be held in abeyance pending review pursuant to subdivision (b) or (h), or the resolution of an appeal filed with the board pursuant to subdivision (e), or with a lead agency governing body pursuant to subdivision (h).
SEC. 6.Section 2772 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2772.(a)The reclamation plan shall be filed with the lead agency, on a form provided by the lead agency, by any person who owns, leases, or otherwise controls or operates on all or any portion of any mined lands and who plans to conduct surface mining operations on the lands.
(b)The reclamation plan shall include a chart identifying the page number, chapter, appendix, or other specific location in the reclamation plan where content meeting the requirements, as applicable, of Sections 2772, 2773, and 2773.3 and Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) and Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, is located.
(c)The reclamation plan shall include all of the following information and documents:
(1)The name and address of the operator and the names and addresses of any persons designated by the operator as an agent for the service of process.
(2)The anticipated quantity and type of minerals for which the surface mining operation is to be conducted.
(3)The proposed dates for the initiation and termination of the surface mining operation.
(4)The maximum anticipated depth of the surface mining operation.
(5)A reclamation plan map or maps that shall include all of the following:
(A)Size and legal description of the lands that will be affected by the surface mining operation and the names and addresses of the owners of all surface interests and mineral interests in the lands.
(B)Clearly defined and accurately drawn property lines, setbacks, and the reclamation plan boundary.
(C)Existing topography and final topography depicted with contour lines drawn at appropriate intervals for the sites conditions.
(D)Detailed geologic description of the area of the surface mining operation.
(E)Location of railroads, utility facilities, access roads, temporary roads to be reclaimed, and any roads remaining for the approved end use.
(F)All maps, diagrams, or calculations that require preparation in accordance with the Professional Engineers Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 6700) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code), the Geologist and Geophysicist Act (Chapter 12.5 (commencing with Section 7800) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code), or the Professional Land Surveyors Act (Chapter 15 (commencing with Section 8700) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) shall be prepared by a California-licensed professional, shall include his or her license number and name, and shall bear the signature and seal of the licensee.
(6)A description of and a plan for the type of surface mining to be employed and a time schedule that will provide for the completion of surface mining on each segment of the mined lands so that reclamation can be initiated at the earliest possible time on those portions of the mined lands that will not be subject to further disturbance by the surface mining operation.
(7)A description of the proposed use or potential uses of the mined lands after reclamation and evidence that all owners of a possessory interest in the land have been notified of the proposed use or potential uses.
(8)A description of the manner in which reclamation, adequate for the proposed use or potential uses, will be accomplished, including both of the following:
(A)A description of the manner in which known contaminants will be controlled and mining waste will be disposed.
(B)A description of the manner in which affected streambed channels and streambanks will be rehabilitated to a condition that minimizes erosion and sedimentation.
(9)An assessment of the effect of implementation of the reclamation plan on future mining in the area.
(10)A statement that the person submitting the reclamation plan accepts responsibility for reclaiming the mined lands in accordance with the reclamation plan.
(11)Any other information that the lead agency may require by ordinance.
(d)An item of information or a document required pursuant to subdivision (c) that has already been prepared as part of a permit application for the surface mining operation or as part of an environmental document prepared for the project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) may be included in the reclamation plan by reference, if that item of information or that document is attached to the reclamation plan when the lead agency submits the reclamation plan to the director for review. To the extent the information, document, or component of a document referenced in the reclamation plan is used to meet the requirements of subdivision (c) or Section 2773 or 2773.3, the information, document, or component of a document shall become part of the reclamation plan and shall be subject to all other requirements of this article.
(e)Nothing in this section is intended to limit or expand the departments authority or responsibility to review a document in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
SEC. 7.Section 2772.1 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2772.1.(a)(1)Prior to approving a surface mining operations reclamation plan or plan amendment, the lead agency shall submit the reclamation plan or plan amendment to the director for review. The reclamation plan or plan amendment shall be submitted to the director as early as practicable in order to facilitate the lead agencys review of the reclamation plan pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)). All documentation for the submission shall be submitted to the director at one time.
(2)An item of information, document, or component of a document that has been prepared as part of a permit application for the surface mining operation or as part of an environmental document prepared for the project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) shall be incorporated into the reclamation plan or plan amendment if it is used to satisfy the requirements of subdivision (c) of Section 2772, Sections 2773 and 2773.3, and Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) and Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, as applicable. If an item of information, document, or component of a document is incorporated, reference to the item shall be added to the chart required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2772 and shall be properly indexed with the corresponding appendix reference and page numbers, if applicable. The item shall be included in an appendix to and shall become part of the reclamation plan or plan amendment.
(3)The lead agency shall certify to the director that the reclamation plan or plan amendment is a complete submission and is in compliance with all of the following:
(A)The applicable requirements of this chapter.
(B)Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) and Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, as applicable.
(C)The lead agencys surface mining ordinance in effect at the time that the reclamation plan or plan amendment is submitted to the director for review, except if the board is the lead agency.
(b)(1)The director shall have 30 days from the receipt of a reclamation plan or plan amendment to notify the lead agency and operator if the submission is incomplete. An incomplete submission is one that does not meet the content requirements of Sections 2772, 2773, and 2773.3 and Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) and Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, as applicable. The directors notice shall specifically identify all aspects of the submission that are incomplete.
(2)The director shall have 30 days after the date the director is required to notify the lead agency if the submission is incomplete to prepare written comments on the reclamation plan or plan amendment if the director chooses.
(3)If the director has issued a notice of incomplete submission pursuant to paragraph (1), the directors time to prepare written comments on the reclamation plan or plan amendment shall not commence until the director receives each item identified in the notice. The directors time shall include any remaining time pursuant to paragraph (1) and the time allowed pursuant to paragraph (2).
(4)The lead agency shall review and evaluate written comments received from the director relating to the reclamation plan or plan amendment within a reasonable amount of time.
(5)(A)The lead agency shall prepare a written response to the directors comments received pursuant to paragraph (2) describing the disposition of the major issues raised by the comments. The lead agency shall submit its response to the director at least 30 days prior to the intended approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment. The lead agencys response shall include either of the following:
(i)A description of how the lead agency proposes to adopt the directors comments to the reclamation plan or plan amendment.
(ii)A detailed description of the reasons why the lead agency proposes not to adopt the directors comments.
(B)Copies of any written comments received and responses prepared by the lead agency pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be forwarded to the operator.
(6)(A)The lead agency shall give the director at least 30 days notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing at which the reclamation plan or plan amendment is scheduled to be approved by the lead agency.
(B)If no hearing is required by this chapter, the local ordinance, or other state law, the lead agency shall provide 30 days notice to the director that the lead agency intends to approve the reclamation plan or plan amendment.
(7)(A)Within 30 days following the approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment, the lead agency shall provide the director notice of the approval. During that period, the department retains all powers, duties, and authorities of this chapter. The lead agency shall provide, as soon as practicable but no later than 60 days after approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment, certified copies of all maps, diagrams, or calculations, signed and sealed.
(B)No later than 60 days after the approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment, the lead agency shall provide to the director an official copy of the approved reclamation plan or plan amendment. The official copy shall incorporate all approved modifications to the reclamation plan or plan amendment and shall include an index showing any permit conditions of approval or binding mitigation measures adopted or certified pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) that are necessary to meet the requirements of subdivision (c) of Section 2772, Sections 2773 and 2773.3, and Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) and Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, as applicable. Those conditions of approval and mitigation measures shall be included in an appendix to the reclamation plan or plan amendment and shall be considered part of the reclamation compliance requirements and subject to the annual inspection requirements.
(c)To the extent there is a conflict between the comments of a trustee agency or a responsible agency that are based on that agencys statutory or regulatory authority and the comments of other commenting agencies that are received by the lead agency pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) regarding a reclamation plan or plan amendments, the lead agency shall consider only the comments of the trustee agency or responsible agency.
(d)Nothing in this section is intended to limit or expand the departments authority or responsibility to review a document in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
SEC. 8.Section 2773.1 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2773.1.(a)Lead agencies shall require financial assurances of each surface mining operation to ensure reclamation is performed in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan, as follows:
(1)A financial assurance mechanism may take the form of surety bonds executed by an admitted surety insurer, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 995.120 of the Code of Civil Procedure, irrevocable letters of credit, trust funds, or other forms of financial assurances specified by the board pursuant to subdivision (e) that the lead agency reasonably determines are adequate to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan.
(2)The financial assurances shall remain in effect for the duration of the surface mining operation and any additional period until reclamation is completed.
(3)The amount of financial assurances required of a surface mining operation for any one year shall be reviewed and, if necessary, adjusted once each calendar year to account for new lands disturbed by surface mining operations, inflation, and reclamation of lands accomplished in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. An operator shall be required to replace an approved financial assurance mechanism to bond for the reclamation of the surface mining operation only if the financial assurance cost estimate identifies a need to increase the amount of the financial assurance mechanism.
(4)Financial assurance cost estimates shall be submitted to the lead agency for review on a form developed by the director and approved by the board. The form shall be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code).
(5)Each financial assurance mechanism shall be made payable to the lead agency and the department. A financial assurance mechanism shall not be released without the consent of the lead agency and the department. A financial assurance mechanism that was approved by the lead agency prior to January 1, 1993, and was made payable to the State Geologist shall be considered payable to the department for purposes of this chapter. However, if a surface mining operation has received approval of its financial assurances from a public agency other than the lead agency, the lead agency shall deem those financial assurances adequate for purposes of this section, or shall credit them toward fulfillment of the financial assurances required by this section, if they are made payable to the public agency, the lead agency, and the department and otherwise meet the requirements of this section. In any event, if a lead agency and one or more public agencies exercise jurisdiction over a surface mining operation, the total amount of financial assurances required by the lead agency and the public agencies for any one year shall not exceed that amount that is necessary to perform reclamation of lands remaining disturbed. For purposes of this paragraph, a public agency may include a federal agency.
(b)(1)If the lead agency, or the board when acting as a lead agency, has evidence that an operator may be financially incapable of completing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan or that the operator may have abandoned the surface mining operation without completing reclamation, the lead agency or the board, when acting as a lead agency, shall conduct a public hearing to determine whether the operator is financially capable of completing reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan or has abandoned the surface mining operation. The hearing shall be noticed to the operator and the director at least 30 days prior to the hearing.
(2)If the lead agency or the board, following the public hearing conducted pursuant to paragraph (1), determines that the operator is financially incapable of performing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan or has abandoned its surface mining operation without completing reclamation, either the lead agency or the director shall do all of the following:
(A)Notify the operator by personal service or certified mail that the lead agency or the director intends to take appropriate action to forfeit the financial assurances and specify the reasons for so doing.
(B)Proceed to take appropriate action to require forfeiture of the financial assurances.
(C)Use the proceeds from the forfeited financial assurances to conduct and complete reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. If the surface mining operation cannot be reclaimed in accordance with its approved reclamation plan, or the financial assurances are inadequate to reclaim in accordance with its approved reclamation plan, the lead agency or director may use forfeited financial assurances to reclaim or remediate mining disturbances as appropriate for the site conditions as determined by both the lead agency and the director. The financial assurances shall not be used for any other purpose. The operator is responsible for the costs of conducting and completing reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan or a remediation plan developed pursuant to this section as determined appropriate by both the lead agency and the director that are in excess of the proceeds from the forfeited financial assurances.
(c)Financial assurances shall no longer be required of a surface mining operation, and shall be released, upon the written concurrence of the lead agency and the director, which shall be forwarded to the operator and the institutions providing or holding the financial assurance mechanism, that reclamation has been completed in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. If a surface mining operation is sold or ownership is transferred to another person, the existing financial assurances shall remain in force and shall not be released by the lead agency and the director until new financial assurances are secured from the new owner and have been approved by the lead agency in accordance with Sections 2770, 2773.1, and 2773.4. Within 90 days of the sale or transfer of a surface mining operation, the new operator shall submit an appropriate financial assurance mechanism, which may be the existing mechanism if the existing mechanism is payable in the event of the new operators financial incapability or abandonment of the surface mining operation, that is subject to review by the lead agency and the director pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2773.4. Within 15 days of the sale or transfer of a surface mining operation, the new operator shall sign a new statement of reclamation responsibility in accordance with paragraph (10) of subdivision (c) of Section 2772.
(d)The lead agency shall have primary responsibility to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and to reclaim mine sites pursuant to subdivision (b). However, if the board is not the lead agency pursuant to Section 2774.4, the director may act to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and reclaim mine sites pursuant to subdivision (b) only if both of the following occurs:
(1)The financial incapability of the operator or the abandonment of the surface mining operation has come to the attention of the director.
(2)The lead agency has been notified in writing by the director of the financial incapability of the operator or the abandonment of the surface mining operation for at least 15 days, the lead agency has not taken appropriate measures to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances and reclaim the mine site, and one of the following has occurred:
(A)The lead agency has been notified in writing by the director that failure to take appropriate measures to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances or to reclaim the mine site shall result in actions being taken against the lead agency under Section 2774.4.
(B)The director determines that there is a violation that amounts to an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health, safety, or to the environment.
(C)The lead agency notifies the director in writing that its good faith attempts to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances have not been successful.
The director shall comply with subdivision (b) in seeking forfeiture of financial assurances and reclaiming mine sites.
(e)The board may adopt regulations specifying financial assurance mechanisms other than surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, and trust funds, which the board determines are reasonably available and adequate to ensure reclamation pursuant to this chapter, but these mechanisms shall not include financial tests or surety bonds executed by one or more personal sureties. These mechanisms may include reclamation bond pool programs.
(f)The board shall adopt or revise guidelines to implement this section as necessary. The guidelines are exempt from the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code), and are not subject to review by the Office of Administrative Law.
SEC. 9.Section 2773.4 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2773.4.(a)(1)Prior to approving the financial assurances for a new reclamation plan or adjustments to financial assurances based on an amendment to a reclamation plan, the lead agency shall submit the financial assurance cost estimate to the director for review.
(2)The lead agency shall provide the director with a determination that the financial assurance cost estimate submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) is adequate, complete, and consistent with Section 2773.1, Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and the boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1.
(3)All documentation submitted to the director pursuant to this subdivision shall be submitted at one time.
(b)No later than 15 days after receiving a financial assurance cost estimate, the director shall notify the lead agency and the operator if the submission is incomplete. An incomplete submission is one that does not meet the content requirements of Section 2773.1, Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and the boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1. The directors notice shall specifically identify all aspects of the submission that are incomplete. The directors time to review the financial assurance cost estimate shall commence upon the receipt of a submission that contains the aspects identified in the directors notice to the lead agency.
(c)(1)The director shall have 45 days from the date of receipt of a complete financial assurance cost estimate to prepare written comments if the director chooses.
(2)The lead agency shall evaluate written comments received from the director relating to the financial assurance cost estimate within a reasonable amount of time. The lead agency shall prepare a written response to the directors comments describing the disposition of the major issues raised by the directors comments.
(3)The lead agency shall submit its proposed response to the director at least 30 days prior to approval of the financial assurance cost estimate. The lead agencys response shall include either of the following:
(A)A description of how the lead agency proposes to adopt the directors comments to the financial assurance cost estimate.
(B)A detailed description of the reasons why the lead agency proposes to not adopt the directors comments.
(4)Copies of any written comments received and responses prepared by the lead agency shall be forwarded to the operator.
(5)(A)If the lead agency, in its written response to the directors comments, proposes to not adopt the directors comments relating to the financial assurance cost estimate, the director, within 15 days of receipt of the lead agencys written response, may request in writing a consultation with the lead agency to discuss the directors comments and the lead agencys response. The request shall include an invitation to the operator to participate in the consultation. The consultation may be conducted in person, electronically, telephonically, or by any means convenient to the parties.
(B)If the director requests a consultation pursuant to this subdivision, the lead agency shall not approve the financial assurance cost estimate until after consulting with the director. The consultation shall occur not later than 30 days after the directors request unless an alternate timeframe is mutually agreed upon by the director, lead agency, and operator.
(6)(A)The lead agency shall give the director at least 30 days notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing at which the financial assurance cost estimate is scheduled to be approved by the lead agency. If no hearing is required by this chapter, local ordinance, or other state law, then the lead agency shall provide 30 days notice to the director that it intends to approve the financial assurance cost estimate.
(B)The lead agency shall send to the director its final response to the directors comments within 30 days following its approval of the financial assurance cost estimate, during which time the department retains all of its powers, duties, and authority pursuant to this chapter.
(d)(1)(A)Within 30 days of an annual inspection being conducted pursuant to Section 2774, an operator shall provide an annual financial assurance cost estimate to the lead agency for review.
(B)If the lead agency fails to cause the inspection of the surface mining operation on the date requested by the operator pursuant to Section 2207 or on the date set by the lead agency pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774, the operator shall provide an annual financial assurance cost estimate to the lead agency for review within 30 days of the applicable inspection date, unless the lead agency causes the inspection to occur within that time period, in which case the operator shall provide an annual financial assurance cost estimate to the lead agency within 30 days of the date of the inspection.
(2)(A)Within 60 days of receiving an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate, the lead agency shall do one of the following:
(i)Deny the financial assurance cost estimate pursuant to paragraph (6).
(ii)Submit the financial assurance cost estimate to the director for review.
(B)The lead agency shall provide the director with a determination that the annual financial assurance cost estimate submitted is adequate, complete, and consistent with Section 2773.1, Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and the boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1.
(3)All documentation submitted to the director pursuant to this subdivision shall be submitted at one time.
(4)Within 15 days of receiving an annual financial assurance cost estimate, the director shall notify the lead agency and the operator if the submission is incomplete. An incomplete submission is one that does not meet the content requirements of Section 2773.1, Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and the boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1. The directors notice shall specifically identify all aspects of the submission that are incomplete. The directors time to review the annual financial assurance cost estimate shall commence upon the receipt of a submission that contains the aspects identified in the directors notice to the lead agency.
(5)(A)Within 45 days of receiving an operators complete annual financial assurance cost estimate from the lead agency, the director shall prepare written comments on the operators annual financial assurance cost estimate and provide the comments to the lead agency and the operator if the director so chooses.
(B)(i)Within 30 days from receiving the directors written comments pursuant to this subdivision, the lead agency shall evaluate the written comments and provide the director and operator its proposed response to the director.
(ii)The lead agency shall submit its proposed response to the director at least 30 days prior to approving the annual financial assurance cost estimate. The lead agencys response shall include either of the following:
(I)A description of how the lead agency proposes to adopt the directors comments to the annual financial assurance cost estimate.
(II)A detailed description of the reasons why the lead agency proposes not to adopt the directors comments.
(iii)Copies of any written comments received and responses prepared by the lead agency pursuant to this subparagraph shall be provided to the operator.
(C)(i)If the lead agency, in its written response to the directors comments, proposes to not adopt the directors comments concerning the annual financial assurance cost estimate, the director, within 15 days of receipt of the lead agencys written response, may request in writing a consultation with the lead agency to discuss the directors comments and the lead agencys response. The request shall include an invitation to the operator to participate in the consultation. The consultation may be conducted in person, electronically, telephonically, or by any means convenient to the parties.
(ii)If the director requests a consultation pursuant to this subparagraph, the lead agency shall not approve the annual financial assurance cost estimate until after consulting with the director. The consultation shall occur not later than 30 days after the directors request unless an alternate timeframe is mutually agreed upon by the director, lead agency, and operator.
(D)(i)Within 60 days of receiving the directors written comments, or of a consultation pursuant to this subdivision, whichever is later or the due date of the directors written comments if none are received, the lead agency shall approve or deny an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate.
(ii)The lead agency shall give the director at least 30 days notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing at which the annual financial assurance cost estimate is scheduled to be approved by the lead agency.
(iii)If no hearing is required by this chapter, local ordinance, or other state law, the lead agency shall provide 30 days notice to the director that it intends to approve the annual financial assurance cost estimate.
(E)Within 30 days of the lead agencys approval of the annual financial assurance cost estimate, the lead agency shall send the director its final response to the directors comments.
(6)If the lead agency determines an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate is inadequate, the lead agency shall specify the reasons for that determination. The operator shall have 30 days to appeal that denial pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2770 or provide a revised financial assurance cost estimate incorporating the suggested changes to the lead agency for approval by the lead agency pursuant to this section.
(e)(1)Within 30 days of the lead agencys approval of a financial assurance cost estimate pursuant to this section, the operator shall provide the lead agency and the director an appropriate financial assurance mechanism.
(2)(A)Within 15 days of receiving a financial assurance mechanism pursuant to this subdivision, or subdivision (c) of Section 2773.1 the lead agency and the director shall review the financial assurance mechanism to determine if the type of mechanism, including the release instructions, meets the requirements of this chapter.
(B)Financial assurance mechanisms determined to be noncompliant with this chapter shall be returned to the operator with instructions on how to correct the type or release instructions of the financial assurance mechanism.
(3)By July 1, 2018, the board shall adopt forms to implement this subdivision as necessary. The forms shall be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code).
(f)The review and approval of financial assurances pursuant to this chapter shall not be considered a project for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
SEC. 10.Section 2774 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.(a)Every lead agency shall adopt ordinances in accordance with state policy that establish procedures for the review and approval of reclamation plans and financial assurances and the issuance of a permit to conduct surface mining operations, except that any lead agency without an active surface mining operation in its jurisdiction may defer adopting an implementing ordinance until the filing of a permit application. The ordinances shall establish procedures requiring at least one public hearing and shall be periodically reviewed by the lead agency and revised, as necessary, to ensure that the ordinances continue to be in accordance with state policy.
(b)(1)The lead agency shall cause surface mining operations to be inspected in intervals of no more than 12 months, solely to determine whether the surface mining operation is in compliance with this chapter. The lead agency shall cause an inspection to be conducted by a state-licensed geologist, state-licensed civil engineer, state-licensed landscape architect, state-licensed forester, or a qualified lead agency employee who has not been employed by the surface mining operation being inspected in any capacity during the previous 12 months, except that a qualified lead agency employee may inspect surface mining operations conducted by the local agency. All inspections shall be conducted using a form developed by the department and approved by the board that includes the professional licensing and disciplinary information of the person who conducted the inspection. The operator shall be solely responsible for the reasonable cost of the inspection. The lead agency shall provide a notice of completion of inspection to the director within 90 days of conducting the inspection. The notice shall contain a statement regarding the surface mining operations compliance with this chapter and a copy of the completed inspection form, and shall specify, as applicable, all of the following:
(A)Aspects of the surface mining operation, if any, that were found to be inconsistent with this chapter but were corrected before the submission of the inspection form to the director.
(B)Aspects of the surface mining operation, if any, that were found to be inconsistent with this chapter but were not corrected before the submission of the inspection form to the director.
(C)A statement describing the lead agencys intended response to any aspects of the surface mining operation found to be inconsistent with this chapter but were not corrected before the submission of the inspection form to the director.
(2)If the surface mining operation has a review of its reclamation plan, financial assurances, or an interim management plan pending under subdivision (b) or (h) of Section 2770, or an appeal pending before the board or lead agency governing body under subdivision (e) or (h) of Section 2770, the notice shall so indicate. The lead agency shall forward to the operator a copy of the notice, a copy of the completed inspection form, and any supporting documentation, including, but not limited to, any inspection report prepared by the geologist, civil engineer, landscape architect, forester, or qualified lead agency employee who conducted the inspection.
(c)If an operator does not request an inspection date on the annual report filed pursuant to Section 2207 or if the lead agency is unable to cause the inspection of a given surface mining operation on the date requested by the operator, the lead agency shall provide the operator with a minimum of five days written notice of a pending inspection or a lesser time period if agreed to by the operator.
(d)No later than July 1 of each year, the lead agency shall submit to the director for each active or idle surface mining operation within the lead agencys jurisdiction the following information:
(1)A copy of any permit or reclamation plan amendments, as applicable.
(2)A statement that there have been no changes during the previous year, as applicable.
(3)The date of each surface mining operations last inspection.
(4)The date of each surface mining operations last financial assurance review pursuant to Section 2773.1 for each operation listed.
(e)(1)No later than December 31, 2017, the department shall establish a training program for all surface mine inspectors. The program shall be designed to include a guidance document, developed by the department, in consultation with the board and stakeholders, to provide instruction and recommendations to surface mine inspectors performing inspections pursuant to subdivision (b).
(2)The training program shall include inspection workshops offered by the department in different regions of the state to provide practical application of the guidance document material.
(3)On and after July 1, 2020, all inspectors shall have on file with the lead agency and the department a certificate of completion of an inspection workshop. An inspector shall attend a workshop no later than five years after the date of his or her most recent certificate.
(4)The adoption of the guidance document by the department pursuant to this subdivision shall be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code).
SEC. 11.Section 2774.1 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.1.(a)(1)Except as provided in subdivision (i) of Section 2770, if the lead agency or the director determines, based upon an annual inspection pursuant to Section 2774, or otherwise confirmed by an inspection of the surface mining operation, that a surface mining operation is not in compliance with this chapter, the lead agency or the director may issue a notice of that violation to the operator by personal service or certified mail. If the lead agency issues the notice, the lead agency shall send a copy of the notice to the director. The notice shall include both of the following:
(A)A description of the violation.
(B)Actions the operator shall take to correct the violation.
(2)(A)If a lead agency or the director determines that the time to correct the noticed violation will exceed 30 days, the lead agency and the operator may enter into a stipulated order to comply, with notice sent to the director. If the director initiated the enforcement action, the director, after consulting with the lead agency, may enter into a stipulated order to comply with the operator. The lead agency may, but need not, join the stipulated order with the director.
(B)A stipulated order to comply shall include a schedule and time for compliance that the lead agency or the director, as applicable, determines is reasonable after taking into account the actions and legal processes required to correct the violation.
(3)(A)If the operator does not comply with a notice issued pursuant to paragraph (1) within 30 days of being served the notice or commit to enter into a stipulated order to comply pursuant to paragraph (2) within 30 days of being served the notice, the lead agency or the director may issue an order to comply by personal service or certified mail requiring the operator to comply with this chapter or, if the operator does not have an approved reclamation plan or financial assurances, cease all further surface mining activities.
(B)An order to comply issued pursuant to this paragraph shall take effect 30 days following the service of the order to comply unless within those 30 days the operator appeals the order to comply and requests a hearing before the lead agency, if the lead agency issued the order, or the board, if the director issued the order. An order to comply issued pursuant to this paragraph shall specify all of the following:
(i)Which aspects of the surface mining operation are inconsistent with this chapter.
(ii)A time for compliance that the lead agency or director determines is reasonable, taking into account the seriousness of the alleged violation and any good faith efforts to comply with applicable requirements.
(iii)The actions and legal processes required to correct the alleged violation.
(C)An appeal filed pursuant to subparagraph (B) shall be noticed and heard at a public hearing within 45 days of the filing of the appeal or a longer period as may be mutually agreed upon by the operator and the lead agency, if the lead agency issued the order, or the operator and the director, if the director issued the order.
(b)[Reserved]
(c)An operator who violates or fails to comply with an order to comply issued under subdivision (a) after the orders effective date or who fails to submit a report or pay annual fees to the director or lead agency as required by Section 2207, shall be subject to an order by the lead agency or the director imposing an administrative penalty of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) per day, assessed from the original date of noncompliance with this chapter, including Section 2207, or from the date of the inspection when the violation was identified, at the discretion of the issuer of the notice of that violation. The penalty may be imposed administratively by the lead agency or the director. In determining the amount of the administrative penalty, the lead agency or the director shall take into consideration the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation or violations, any prior history of violations, the degree of culpability, economic savings, if any, resulting from the violation, and any other matters justice may require. Orders setting administrative penalties shall become effective upon issuance of the assessment and payment shall be made to the lead agency or the director within 30 days, unless the operator petitions the legislative body of the lead agency, the board, or the superior court for review as provided in Section 2774.2. An order shall be served by personal service or by certified mail upon the operator. Penalties collected by the director shall not be used for purposes other than to cover the reasonable costs incurred by the director in implementing this chapter or Section 2207.
(d)(1)An operator who violates or fails to comply with an order to comply issued pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) or a stipulated order to comply entered into pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) after the orders effective date shall be removed from the list published by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2717.
(2)If after a public hearing the board or lead agency denies an appeal by the operator pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), the operator shall be removed 10 working days following the denial of the appeal from the list published by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2717.
(3)If the operator enters into a stipulated order to comply between the operator and the lead agency, if the lead agency issued the order, or the operator and the director, if the director issued the order, within 10 working days of the denial of the appeal and the stipulated order to comply is consistent with the order to comply upheld by the board or lead agency and includes a stipulated schedule for compliance, the operator shall remain on the list published by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2717.
(4)Issuance of a notice pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) or an order to comply or stipulated order to comply pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (a) shall not disqualify an operator from eligibility for placement on the list published by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2717.
(e)If the lead agency or the director determines that the surface mine is not in compliance with this chapter, so that the surface mine presents an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or the environment, the lead agency or the Attorney General, on behalf of the director, may seek an order from a court of competent jurisdiction enjoining that operation.
(f)Upon a complaint by the director, the department, or the board, the Attorney General may bring an action to recover administrative penalties under this section, and penalties under Section 2207, in any court of competent jurisdiction in this state against any person violating any provision of this chapter or Section 2207, or any regulation adopted pursuant to this chapter or Section 2207. The Attorney General may bring this action on his or her own initiative if, after examining the complaint and the evidence, he or she believes a violation has occurred. The Attorney General may also seek an order from a court of competent jurisdiction compelling the operator to comply with this chapter and Section 2207.
(g)(1)The lead agency has primary responsibility for enforcing this chapter and Section 2207. In cases where the board is not the lead agency pursuant to Section 2774.4, enforcement actions may be initiated by the director pursuant to this section only after the violation has come to the attention of the director and either of the following occurs:
(A)The lead agency has been notified by the director in writing of the violation for at least 30 days, and has not taken appropriate enforcement action, which may include failing to issue an order to comply within a reasonable time after issuing a notice of violation.
(B)The director determines that there is a violation that amounts to an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or safety, or to the environment.
(2)The director shall comply with this section in initiating enforcement actions.
(h)Remedies under this section are in addition to, and do not supersede or limit, any and all other remedies, civil or criminal.
SEC. 12.Section 2774.2 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.2.(a)Within 30 days of the issuance of an order setting administrative penalties under subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1, the operator may petition the legislative body of the lead agency, if the lead agency has issued the order, or the board for orders issued by the director, for review of the order. If the operator does not petition for review within the time limits set by this subdivision, the order setting administrative penalties shall not be subject to review by any court or agency.
(b)The legislative body of the lead agency or the board shall notify the operator by personal service or certified mail whether it will review the order setting administrative penalties. In reviewing an order pursuant to this section, the record shall consist of the record before the lead agency or the director and any other relevant evidence which, in the judgment of the legislative body or the board, should be considered to effectuate and implement the policies of this chapter.
(c)The legislative body or the board may affirm, modify, or set aside, in whole or in part, by its own order an order of the lead agency or the director setting administrative penalties reviewed by the legislative body or the board pursuant to this section.
(d)An order of the legislative body or the board issued under subdivision (c) shall become effective upon its issuance unless the operator petitions the superior court for review as provided in subdivision (e). An order shall be served by personal service or by certified mail upon the operator. Payment of an administrative penalty that is specified in an order issued pursuant to subdivision (c) shall be made to the lead agency or the director within 30 days of service of the order. However, the payment shall be held in an interest bearing impound account pending the resolution of a petition for review filed pursuant to subdivision (e).
(e)An operator aggrieved by an order of the legislative body or the board issued pursuant to subdivision (c) may obtain review of the order by filing in the superior court a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days following the issuance of the order. An operator aggrieved by an order of a lead agency or the director setting administrative penalties pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1, for which the legislative body or board denies review, may obtain review of the order in the superior court by filing in the court a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days following the denial of review. The provisions of Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall govern judicial proceedings pursuant to this subdivision, except that in every case the court shall exercise its independent judgment. If the operator does not petition for a writ of mandate within the time limits set by this subdivision, an order of the board or the legislative body shall not be subject to review by any court or agency.
(f)(1)After the expiration of the time to petition for review pursuant to subdivision (a) or (e), the director or the board acting as the lead agency may apply to the small claims court or the superior court, depending on the jurisdictional amount, in the county where the administrative penalty was imposed for a judgment to collect the unpaid administrative penalty imposed pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1. The application shall include all of the following:
(A)The order setting the administrative penalty pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1.
(B)A notice to the operator of the right to petition for review of the order.
(C)Either of the following:
(i)A declaration from the board that no petition was made or that the board declined to review the petition.
(ii)A copy of the final order of the board.
(2)An application submitted pursuant to this subdivision shall constitute a sufficient showing to warrant the issuance of the judgment. The court clerk shall enter the judgment immediately in conformity with the application.
(3)The judgment entered pursuant to this subdivision shall have the same force and effect as, and shall be subject to all the provisions of law relating to, a judgment in a civil action and may be enforced in the same manner as any other judgment of the court. The court shall make enforcement of the judgment a priority.
SEC. 13.Section 2774.4 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.4.(a)The board shall exercise some or all of a lead agencys powers under this chapter pursuant to subdivision (c), except for permitting authority and vested rights determinations, if the board finds that a lead agency has done any of the following:
(1)Approved reclamation plans or financial assurances that are not consistent with this chapter.
(2)Failed to inspect or cause the inspection of surface mining operations as required by this chapter.
(3)Failed to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and to carry out reclamation of surface mining operations as required by this chapter.
(4)Failed to take appropriate enforcement actions as required by this chapter.
(5)Intentionally misrepresented the results of inspections required under this chapter.
(6)Failed to submit information to the department as required by this chapter.
(b)The board shall conduct a public hearing no sooner than three years after the board has taken action pursuant to subdivision (a) to determine if a lead agency has corrected its deficiencies in implementing and enforcing this chapter and the rules and regulations adopted pursuant to this chapter. If the board finds the lead agency has corrected some or all of its deficiencies in implementing and enforcing this chapter, the board shall restore to the lead agency some or all of the powers assumed by the board pursuant to subdivision (a).
(c)(1)Before taking any action pursuant to subdivision (a), the board shall first notify the lead agency of the identified deficiencies and allow the lead agency 45 days to provide a response to the board on the identified deficiencies. The board may review the lead agencys response at a regularly scheduled meeting.
(2)(A)If the board is not satisfied with the lead agencys response, the board shall hold a public hearing within the lead agencys area of jurisdiction, upon a 45-day written notice given to the public in at least one newspaper of general circulation within the city or county and directly mailed to the lead agency and to all operators within the lead agencys jurisdiction who have submitted reports as required by Section 2207.
(B)At the hearing, the board shall determine if the lead agency has engaged in the conduct described in subdivision (a). If the board finds that the lead agency has engaged in conduct described in subdivision (a), the board shall do either of the following:
(i)Require the lead agency to develop a remedial plan to correct the noted deficiencies. The remedial plan shall describe specific objectives and corresponding processes designed to address, at a minimum, the noted deficiencies and a time that the remedial plan will be fully implemented. The board shall set a hearing to review the completion of the remedial plan consistent with paragraph (2) and subdivisions (d) and (e).
(ii)Take immediate action pursuant to subdivision (a).
(d)Affected operators and interested persons have the right at the public hearing to present oral and written evidence on the matter being considered. At the public hearing, the board may place reasonable limits on the right of affected operators and interested persons to question and solicit testimony.
(e)(1)If the board decides to take action pursuant to subdivision (a) and exercise some or all of a lead agencys powers under this chapter, except for permitting authority and vested rights determinations, the board, based on the record of the public hearing, shall adopt written findings that explain all of the following:
(A)The action to be taken by the board.
(B)Why the board decided to take the action.
(C)Why the action is authorized by and meets the requirements of subdivision (a).
(2)In addition, the boards findings shall address the significant issues raised, or written evidence presented, by affected operators, interested persons, the lead agency, or the department. The transcript of testimony and exhibits, together with all papers and requests filed in the proceedings, shall constitute the exclusive record for decision by the board.
(f)If the board finds at the hearing held pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) that the lead agency has not completed the remedial plan prepared pursuant to clause (i) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) to the boards satisfaction, the board shall follow the procedures set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) and subdivisions (d) and (e). If the board finds at the hearing held pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) that the lead agency has completed the remedial plan prepared pursuant to clause (i) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) to the boards satisfaction, the board shall conclude the action it has taken pursuant to this section.
(g)The lead agency, any affected operator, or any interested person who has presented oral or written evidence at the public hearing before the board pursuant to subdivision (d) may obtain review of the boards action taken pursuant to subdivision (a) by filing in the superior court a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days following the issuance of the boards decision. Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure governs judicial proceedings pursuant to this subdivision, except that in every case the court shall exercise its independent judgment. If a petition for a writ of mandate is not filed within the time limits set by this subdivision, the boards action under subdivision (a) shall not be subject to review by any court or agency.
SEC. 14.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
SEC. 15.This act shall become operative only if both this bill and Senate Bill 209 of the 201516 Regular Session are enacted and become operative on or before January 1, 2017.
(a)The owner or the operator of a mining operation within the state shall forward to the director annually, not later than a date established by the director, upon forms approved by the board from time to time, a report that identifies and contains all of the following:
(1)The name, address, and telephone number of the person, company, or other owner of the mining operation.
(2)The name, address, and telephone number of a designated agent who resides in this state, and who will receive and accept service of all orders, notices, and processes of the lead agency, board, director, or court.
(3)The location of the mining operation, its name, its mine number as issued by the Office of Mine Reclamation or the director, its section, township, range, latitude, longitude, and approximate boundaries of the mining operation marked on a United States Geological Survey 71/2-minute or 15-minute quadrangle map.
(4)The lead agency.
(5)The approval date of the mining operations reclamation plan.
(6)The mining operations status as active, idle, reclaimed, or in the process of being reclaimed.
(7)The commodities produced by the mine and the type of mining operation.
(8)A copy of the previously completed annual inspection form and a requested date, within 12 months of the prior inspection date, for the next annual inspection by the lead agency.
(9)Proof of financial assurances.
(10)Ownership of the property, including government agencies, if applicable, by the assessors parcel number, and total assessed value of the mining operation.
(11)The approximate permitted size of the mining operation subject to Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), in acres.
(12)The approximate total acreage of land newly disturbed by the mining operation during the previous calendar year.
(13)The approximate total of disturbed acreage reclaimed during the previous calendar year.
(14)The approximate total unreclaimed disturbed acreage remaining as of the end of the calendar year.
(15)The total production for each mineral commodity produced during the previous year.
(16)A copy of any approved reclamation plan and any amendments or conditions of approval to any existing reclamation plan approved by the lead agency.
(b)(1)Every year, not later than the date established by the director, the person submitting the report pursuant to subdivision (a) shall forward to the lead agency, upon forms furnished by the board, a report that provides all of the information specified in subdivision (a).
(2)The owner or operator of a mining operation shall allow access to the property to any governmental agency or the agent of any company providing financial assurances in connection with the reclamation plan in order that the reclamation can be carried out by the entity or company, in accordance with the provisions of the reclamation plan.
(c)Subsequent reports shall include only changes in the information submitted for the items described in subdivision (a), except that, instead of the approved reclamation plan, the reports shall include any reclamation plan amendments approved during the previous year. The reports shall state whether review of a reclamation plan, financial assurances, or an interim management plan is pending under subdivision (b) or (h) of Section 2770, or whether an appeal before the board or lead agency governing body is pending under subdivision (e) or (h) of Section 2770. The director shall notify the person submitting the report and the owners designated agent in writing that the report and the fee required pursuant to subdivision (d) have been received, specify the mining operations mine number if one has not been issued by the Office of Mine Reclamation, and notify the person and agent of any deficiencies in the report within 90 days of receipt. That person or agent shall have 30 days from receipt of the notification to correct the noted deficiencies and forward the revised report to the director and the lead agency. Any person who fails to comply with this section, or knowingly provides incorrect or false information in reports required by this section, may be subject to an administrative penalty as provided in subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1.
(d)(1)The board shall impose, by regulation, pursuant to paragraph (2), an annual reporting fee on, and method for collecting annual fees from, each active or idle mining operation. The maximum fee for any single mining operation may not exceed four thousand dollars ($4,000) annually and may not be less than one hundred dollars ($100) annually, as adjusted for the cost of living as measured by the California Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers, calendar year averages, using the percentage change in the previous year, beginning with the 200506 fiscal year and annually thereafter.
(2)(A)The board shall adopt, by regulation, a schedule of fees authorized under paragraph (1) to cover the departments cost in carrying out this section and Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), as reflected in the Governors proposed Budget, and may adopt those regulations as emergency regulations. In establishing the schedule of fees to be paid by each active and idle mining operation, the fees shall be calculated on an equitable basis reflecting the size and type of operation. The board shall also consider the total assessed value of the mining operation, the acreage disturbed by mining activities, and the acreage subject to the reclamation plan.
(B)Regulations adopted pursuant to this subdivision shall be adopted by the board in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code). The adoption of any emergency regulations pursuant to this subdivision shall be considered necessary to address an emergency and shall be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, and general welfare.
(3)The total revenue generated by the reporting fees may not exceed, and may be less than, the amount of three million five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000), as adjusted for the cost of living as measured by the California Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers, calendar year averages, using the percentage change in the previous year, beginning with the 200506 fiscal year and annually thereafter. If the director determines that the revenue collected during the preceding fiscal year was greater or less than the cost to operate the program, the board shall adjust the fees to compensate for the overcollection or undercollection of revenues.
(4)(A)The reporting fees established pursuant to this subdivision shall be deposited in the Mine Reclamation Account, which is hereby created. Any fees, penalties, interest, fines, or charges collected by the director or board pursuant to this chapter or Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710) shall be deposited in the Mine Reclamation Account. The money in the account shall be available to the department and board, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purpose of carrying out this section and complying with Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), which includes, but is not limited to, classification and designation of areas with mineral resources of statewide or regional significance, reclamation plan and financial assurance review, mine inspection, and enforcement.
(B)(i)In addition to reporting fees, the board shall collect five dollars ($5) per ounce of gold and ten cents ($0.10) per ounce of silver mined within the state and shall deposit the fees collected in the Abandoned Mine Reclamation and Minerals Fund Subaccount, which is hereby created in the Mine Reclamation Account. The department may expend the moneys in the subaccount, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for only the purposes of Section 2796.5 and as authorized herein for the remediation of abandoned mines.
(ii)Notwithstanding subdivision (j) of Section 2796.5, fees collected pursuant to clause (i) may also be used to remediate features of historic abandoned mines and lands that they impact. For the purposes of this section, historic abandoned mines are mines for which operations have been conducted before January 1, 1976, and include, but are not limited to, historic gold and silver mines.
(5)In case of late payment of the reporting fee, a penalty of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) or 10 percent of the amount due, whichever is greater, plus interest at the rate of 11/2 percent per month, computed from the delinquent date of the assessment until and including the date of payment, shall be assessed. New mining operations that have not submitted a report shall submit a report prior to commencement of operations. The new operation shall submit its fee according to the reasonable fee schedule adopted by the board, and the month that the report is received shall become that operations anniversary month.
(e)The lead agency, or the board when acting as the lead agency, may impose a fee upon each mining operation to cover the reasonable costs incurred in implementing this chapter and Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710).
(f)For purposes of this section, mining operation means a mining operation of any kind or character whatever in this state, including, but not limited to, a mining operation that is classified as a surface mining operation as defined in Section 2735, unless excepted by Section 2714. For the purposes of fee collections only, mining operation may include one or more mines operated by a single operator or mining company on one or more sites, if the total annual combined mineral production for all sites is less than 100 troy ounces for precious metals, if precious metals are the primary mineral commodity produced, or less than 100,000 short tons if the primary mineral commodity produced is not precious metals.
(g)Any information in reports submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) that includes or otherwise indicates the total mineral production, reserves, or rate of depletion of any mining operation may not be disclosed to any member of the public, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 6252 of the Government Code. Other portions of the reports are public records unless excepted by statute. Statistical bulletins based on these reports and published under Section 2205 shall be compiled to show, for the state as a whole and separately for each lead agency, the total of each mineral produced therein. In order not to disclose the production, reserves, or rate of depletion from any identifiable mining operation, no production figure shall be published or otherwise disclosed unless that figure is the aggregated production of not less than three mining operations. If the production figure for any lead agency would disclose the production, reserves, or rate of depletion of less than three mining operations or otherwise permit the reasonable inference of the production, reserves, or rate of depletion of any identifiable mining operation, that figure shall be combined with the same figure of not less than two other lead agencies without regard to the location of the lead agencies. The bulletin shall be published annually by June 30 or as soon thereafter as practicable.
(h)The approval of a form by the board pursuant to this section is not the adoption of a regulation for purposes of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code) and is not subject to that act.
SEC. 2.SECTION 1.Section 2207.2 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2207.2.(a)No later than December 31, 2021, the director shall report to the Legislature on the expenditure of moneys in the Mine Reclamation Account, created pursuant to Section 2207. The report shall include all of the following:
(1)An overview of how the moneys expended over the prior five fiscal years have been allocated between classification and designation of areas with mineral resources of statewide or regional significance, reclamation plan and financial assurance review, mine inspection, lead agency support and assistance, annual report processing, support for the board, enforcement, and any other activities that constituted more than 5 percent of expenditures.
(2)Information on the portion of the fees that have been collected from small construction aggregate providers with under 50,000 tons of production.
(3)Information on the percentage of the fees that have been paid by metallic mineral operations.
(b)This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2026, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2026, deletes or extends that date.
SEC. 3.SEC. 2.Section 2715.5 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2715.5.(a)The Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, in conjunction with a site specific plan deemed consistent by the lead agency with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, until December 31, 2017, shall be considered to be a functional equivalent of a reclamation plan for the purposes of this chapter. No other reclamation plan shall be required to be reviewed and approved for any excavation project subject to the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan that is conducted in conformance with an approved site specific plan that is consistent with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan and the standards specified in that plan governing erosion control, channel stabilization, habitat restoration, flood control, or infrastructure maintenance, if that plan is reviewed and approved by a lead agency pursuant to this chapter.
(b)For the purposes of this section, the board of supervisors of the county in which the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan is to be implemented shall prepare and file the annual report required to be prepared pursuant to Section 2207.
(c)Nothing in this section precludes an enforcement action by the board or the department brought pursuant to this chapter or Section 2207 if the lead agency or the director determines that a surface mining operator, acting under the authority of the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, is not in compliance with the requirements of this chapter or Section 2207.
(d)For purposes of this section, site specific plan means an individual project plan approved by the lead agency that is consistent with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan. Site specific plans prepared in conformance with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan shall include, at a minimum, the information required pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2772, shall comply with the requirements of Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and shall be provided along with a financial assurance estimate to the department for review and comment pursuant to Section 2772.1 or 2773.4, as applicable. Notwithstanding the number of days authorized by subdivision (b) of Section 2772.1 or subdivision (c) of Section 2773.4, the department shall review the site specific plan and the financial assurance estimate and prepare any written comments within 15 days from the date of receipt of the plan and the estimate.
(e)Prior to engaging in an excavation activity in conformance with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, a surface mining operation shall be required to obtain financial assurances that meet the requirements of Section 2773.1.
(f)This section shall remain in effect only until December 31, 2017, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute that is enacted before December 31, 2017, deletes or extends that date.
SEC. 4.SEC. 3.Section 2733 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2733.Reclamation means the combined process of land treatment that minimizes water degradation, air pollution, damage to aquatic or wildlife habitat, flooding, erosion, and other adverse effects from surface mining operations, including adverse surface effects incidental to underground mines, so that mined lands are reclaimed to a usable condition that is readily adaptable for alternate land uses and create no danger to public health or safety. The process may extend to affected lands surrounding mined lands, and may require backfilling, grading, resoiling, revegetation, soil compaction, slope stabilization, or other measures.
SEC. 5.SEC. 4.Section 2736 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2736.Financial assurances means a current approved financial assurance cost estimate and a financial assurance mechanism that is at least equal to the current approved financial assurance cost estimate.
SEC. 6.SEC. 5.Section 2770 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2770.(a)Except as provided in this section, a person shall not conduct surface mining operations unless a permit is obtained from, a reclamation plan has been submitted to and approved by, and financial assurances for reclamation have been approved by the lead agency for the operation pursuant to this article.
(b)A person with an existing surface mining operation who has vested rights pursuant to Section 2776 and who does not have an approved reclamation plan shall submit a reclamation plan to the lead agency not later than March 31, 1988. If a reclamation plan application is not on file by March 31, 1988, the continuation of the surface mining operation is prohibited until a reclamation plan is submitted to the lead agency. For the purposes of this subdivision, a reclamation plan existing prior to January 1, 2016, 2017, may consist of all or the appropriate sections of any plans or written agreements previously approved by the lead agency or another agency, together with any additional documents needed to substantially meet the requirements of Sections 2772 and 2773 and the lead agency surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774, provided that all documents, which together were proposed to serve as the reclamation plan, are submitted for approval to the lead agency in accordance with this chapter.
(c)[Reserved]
(d)[Reserved]
(e)(1)A person who can substantiate, based on the evidence of the record, that a lead agency has either (1) failed to act according to due process or has relied on considerations not related to the specific applicable requirements of Sections 2772, 2772.1, 2773, 2773.1, 2773.3, and 2773.4 and the lead agency surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774 in reaching a decision to deny approval of a reclamation plan or financial assurances for reclamation, or (2) failed to act within a reasonable time of receipt of a completed application may appeal that action or inaction to the board.
(2)The director may appeal a lead agencys approval of a financial assurance cost estimate to the board if the director has commented pursuant to Section 2773.4 that the financial assurance cost estimate is inadequate based on consideration of the following:
(A)Section 2773.1.
(B)Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
(C)The boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1
(3)If the approved financial assurance cost estimate applies to a reclamation plan approved for a new surface mining operation, an expanded surface mining operation, or an interim financial assurance due to an order to comply, stipulated or otherwise, the operator shall provide a financial assurance mechanism pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2773.4 in the amount of the approved financial assurance cost estimate, notwithstanding an appeal filed pursuant to this subdivision and subject to modification pending the outcome of the appeal.
(4)If the approved financial assurance cost estimate is an update to an existing approved financial assurance cost estimate, the existing financial assurance mechanism shall remain in place and shall not be adjusted until a final determination by the board on the appeal filed pursuant to this subdivision.
(f)(1)The board may decline to hear an appeal if it determines that the appeal raises no substantial issues related to the lead agencys decision to deny the approval of a reclamation plan or financial assurance, on or the timeliness in reviewing a completed application, or on the approval of a financial assurance cost estimate that the director has commented is inadequate. application. Appeals filed by the director shall be heard by the board.
(2)If the board takes up an appeal, the appeal shall be scheduled and heard at a public hearing within 45 days of the filing of the appeal. If appeal, or a longer period as may be mutually agreed to by the board, the appellant, and the operator, or, if the appeal is filed by the director, a longer period may be mutually agreed upon by the board, the appellant, the director, and the operator, as applicable. operator.
(g)(1)(A)When hearing an appeal filed pursuant to paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (e), the board shall determine whether the reclamation plan or the financial assurance cost estimate substantially meets the applicable requirements of Sections 2772, 2772.1, 2773, 2773.1, 2773.3, and 2773.4 2773.4; Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500), Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700), and Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; and the lead agencys surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774. The board shall approve or uphold a reclamation plan or financial assurance cost estimate determined to meet those applicable requirements. In any event, financial assurances for reclamation shall be sufficient to perform reclamation of lands remaining disturbed.
(B)For purposes of this subdivision, substantially means actual compliance in respect to the substance and form requirements essential to the objectives of this chapter.
(2)(A)A reclamation plan determined not to meet the applicable requirements of Sections 2772, 2772.1, 2773, 2773.1, 2773.3, and 2773.4 2773.4; Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500), Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700), and Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; and the lead agencys surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774 shall be returned to the operator with a notice of deficiencies. The operator shall be granted, once only, a period of 30 days or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the operator and the board to do both of the following:
(i)Correct the noted deficiencies.
(ii)Submit the revised reclamation plan to the lead agency for review and approval.
(B)Within 10 days of the hearing, the board shall provide notice via certified mail to the lead agency, the operator, and the department of the boards determination. The notice shall include instructions to the operator to submit to the lead agency for approval a revised reclamation plan consistent with the boards determination.
(3)(A)If the board determines the lead agencys approved financial assurance cost estimate does not meet the requirements of Sections 2773.1, 2773.1 and 2773.4, Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and the boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1, the board shall note the deficiencies, and deficiencies and, based on the record, include adequate cost estimates for each noted deficiency.
(B)Within 10 days of the hearing, the board shall provide notice via certified mail to the lead agency, the operator, and the department of the boards determination with instructions to the operator to submit to the lead agency for approval a revised financial assurance cost estimate consistent with the boards determination. The instructions shall include a reasonable submission deadline of not less than 30 days.
(C)The lead agency shall approve the revised financial assurance cost estimate. That approval shall supersede and void the prior approved financial assurance cost estimate.
(D)A financial assurance mechanism shall be established by the operator pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2773.4 following the approval of the financial assurance cost estimate.
(E)The failure of the operator to submit to the lead agency a revised financial assurance cost estimate consistent with the boards determination and deadline may be grounds for the issuance of an order to comply pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774.1.
(h)(1)Within 90 days of a surface mining operation becoming idle, as defined in Section 2727.1, the operator shall submit to the lead agency for review and approval an interim management plan. The review and approval of an interim management plan shall not be considered a project for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)). The approved interim management plan shall be considered an amendment to the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan for purposes of this chapter. The interim management plan shall provide measures the operator will implement to maintain the site in compliance with this chapter, including, but not limited to, all permit conditions.
(2)The interim management plan may remain in effect for a period not to exceed five years, at which time the lead agency shall do one of the following:
(A)Renew the interim management plan for an additional period not to exceed five years, which may be renewed for one additional five-year renewal period at the expiration of the first five-year renewal period, if the lead agency finds that the surface mining operator has complied fully with the interim management plan.
(B)Require the operator to commence reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan.
(3)The financial assurances required by Section 2773.1 shall remain in effect during the period that the surface mining operation is idle. If the surface mining operation is still idle after the expiration of its interim management plan, the operator shall commence reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan.
(4)Within 60 days of the receipt of the interim management plan or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the lead agency and the operator, the lead agency shall review and approve the plan in accordance with its ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774, so long as the plan satisfies the requirements of this subdivision, and so notify the operator in writing. Otherwise, the lead agency shall notify the operator in writing of any deficiencies in the plan. The operator shall have 30 days, or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the operator and the lead agency, to submit a revised plan.
(5)The lead agency shall approve or deny approval of the revised interim management plan within 60 days of receipt. If the lead agency denies approval of the revised interim management plan, the operator may appeal that action to the lead agencys governing body, which shall schedule a public hearing within 45 days of the filing of the appeal or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the operator and the governing body.
(6)Unless review of an interim management plan is pending before the lead agency or an appeal is pending before the lead agencys governing body, a surface mining operation that remains idle for over one year after becoming idle, as defined in Section 2727.1, without obtaining approval of an interim management plan shall be considered abandoned and the operator shall commence and complete reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan.
(i)An enforcement action that may be brought against a surface mining operation for operating without an approved reclamation plan, financial assurance, or interim management plan shall be held in abeyance pending review pursuant to subdivision (b) or (h), or the resolution of an appeal filed with the board pursuant to subdivision (e), or with a lead agency governing body pursuant to subdivision (h).
SEC. 7.SEC. 6.Section 2772 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2772.(a)The reclamation plan shall be filed with the lead agency, on a form provided by the lead agency, by any person who owns, leases, or otherwise controls or operates on all or any portion of any mined lands and who plans to conduct surface mining operations on the lands.
(b)The reclamation plan shall include a chart identifying the page number, chapter, appendix, or other specific location in the reclamation plan where content meeting the requirements, as applicable, of Sections 2772, 2773, and 2773.3 and Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) and Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, is located.
(c)The reclamation plan shall include all of the following information and documents:
(1)The name and address of the operator and the names and addresses of any persons designated by the operator as an agent for the service of process.
(2)The anticipated quantity and type of minerals for which the surface mining operation is to be conducted.
(3)The proposed dates for the initiation and termination of the surface mining operation.
(4)The maximum anticipated depth of the surface mining operation.
(5)A reclamation plan map or maps that shall include all of the following:
(A)Size and legal description of the lands that will be affected by the surface mining operation and the names and addresses of the owners of all surface interests and mineral interests in the lands.
(B)Clearly defined and accurately drawn property lines, setbacks, and the reclamation plan boundary.
(C)Existing topography and final topography depicted with contour lines drawn at appropriate intervals for the sites conditions.
(D)Detailed geologic description of the area of the surface mining operation.
(E)Location of railroads, utility facilities, access roads, temporary roads to be reclaimed, and any roads remaining for the approved end use.
(F)All maps, diagrams, or calculations that require preparation in accordance with the Professional Engineers Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 6700) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code), the Geologist and Geophysicist Act (Chapter 12.5 (commencing with Section 7800) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code), or the Professional Land Surveyors Act (Chapter 15 (commencing with Section 8700) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) shall be prepared by a California-licensed professional, shall include his or her license number and name, and shall bear the signature and seal of the licensee.
(6)A description of and a plan for the type of surface mining to be employed and a time schedule that will provide for the completion of surface mining on each segment of the mined lands so that reclamation can be initiated at the earliest possible time on those portions of the mined lands that will not be subject to further disturbance by the surface mining operation.
(7)A description of the proposed use or potential uses of the mined lands after reclamation and evidence that all owners of a possessory interest in the land have been notified of the proposed use or potential uses.
(8)A description of the manner in which reclamation, adequate for the proposed use or potential uses, will be accomplished, including both of the following:
(A)A description of the manner in which known contaminants will be controlled and mining waste will be disposed.
(B)A description of the manner in which affected streambed channels and streambanks will be rehabilitated to a condition that minimizes erosion and sedimentation.
(9)An assessment of the effect of implementation of the reclamation plan on future mining in the area.
(10)A statement that the person submitting the reclamation plan accepts responsibility for reclaiming the mined lands in accordance with the reclamation plan.
(11)Any other information that the lead agency may require by ordinance.
(d)An item of information or a document required pursuant to subdivision (c) that has already been prepared as part of a permit application for the surface mining operation, operation or as part of an environmental document prepared for the project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) may be included in the reclamation plan by reference, if that item of information or that document is attached to the reclamation plan when the lead agency submits the reclamation plan to the director for review. To the extent the information, document, or component of a document referenced in the reclamation plan is used to meet the requirements of subdivision (c) or Section 2773 or 2773.3, the information, document, or component of a document shall become part of the reclamation plan and shall be subject to all other requirements of this article.
(e)Nothing in this section is intended to limit or expand the departments authority or responsibility to review a document in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
SEC. 8.SEC. 7.Section 2772.1 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2772.1.(a)(1)Prior to approving a surface mining operations reclamation plan or plan amendment, the lead agency shall submit the reclamation plan or plan amendment to the director for review. The reclamation plan or plan amendment shall be submitted to the director as early as practicable in order to facilitate the lead agencys review of the reclamation plan pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)). All documentation for the submission shall be submitted to the director at one time.
(2)An item of information, document, or component of a document that has been prepared as part of a permit application for the surface mining operation or as part of an environmental document prepared for the project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) shall be incorporated into the reclamation plan or plan amendment if it is used to satisfy the requirements of subdivision (c) of Section 2772, Sections 2773 and 2773.3, and Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) and Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, as applicable. If an item of information, document, or component of a document is incorporated, reference to the item shall be added to the chart required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2772 and shall be properly indexed with the corresponding appendix reference and page numbers, if applicable. The item shall be included in an appendix to and shall become part of the reclamation plan or plan amendment.
(3)The lead agency shall certify to the director that the reclamation plan or plan amendment is a complete submission and is in compliance with all of the following:
(A)The applicable requirements of this chapter.
(B)Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) and Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, as applicable.
(C)The lead agencys surface mining ordinance in effect at the time that the reclamation plan or plan amendment is submitted to the director for review, except if the board is the lead agency.
(b)(1)The director shall have 30 days from the receipt of a reclamation plan or plan amendment to notify the lead agency and operator if the submission is incomplete. An incomplete submission is one that does not meet the content requirements of subdivisions (c) and (d) of Section 2772, Sections 2773 2772, 2773, and 2773.3, 2773.3 and Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) and Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, as applicable. The directors notice shall specifically identify all aspects of the submission that are incomplete.
(2)The director shall have 30 days after the date the director is required to notify the lead agency if the submission is incomplete to prepare written comments on the reclamation plan or plan amendment if the director chooses.
(3)If the director has issued a notice of incomplete submission pursuant to paragraph (1), the directors time to prepare written comments on the reclamation plan or plan amendment shall not commence until the director receives each item identified in the notice. The directors time shall include any remaining time pursuant to paragraph (1) and the time allowed pursuant to paragraph (2).
(4)The lead agency shall review and evaluate written comments received from the director relating to the reclamation plan or plan amendment within a reasonable amount of time.
(5)(A)The lead agency shall prepare a written response to the directors comments received pursuant to paragraph (2) describing the disposition of the major issues raised by the comments. The lead agency shall submit its response to the director at least 30 days prior to the intended approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment. The lead agencys response shall include either of the following:
(i)A description of how the lead agency proposes to adopt the directors comments to the reclamation plan or plan amendment.
(ii)A detailed description of the reasons why the lead agency proposes not to adopt the directors comments.
(B)Copies of any written comments received and responses prepared by the lead agency pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be forwarded to the operator.
(6)(A)The lead agency shall give the director at least 30 days notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing at which the reclamation plan or plan amendment is scheduled to be approved by the lead agency.
(B)If no hearing is required by this chapter, the local ordinance, or other state law, the lead agency shall provide 30 days notice to the director that the lead agency intends to approve the reclamation plan or plan amendment.
(7)(A)Within 30 days following the approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment, the lead agency shall provide the director notice of the approval. During that period, the department retains all powers, duties, and authorities of this chapter. The lead agency shall provide, as soon as practicable but no later than 60 days after approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment, certified copies of all maps, diagrams, or calculations, signed and sealed.
(B)No later than 60 days after the approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment, the lead agency shall provide to the director an official copy of the approved reclamation plan or plan amendment. The official copy shall incorporate all approved modifications to the reclamation plan or plan amendment and shall include an index showing any permit conditions of approval or binding mitigation measures adopted or certified pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) that are necessary to meet the requirements of subdivision (c) of Section 2772, Sections 2773 and 2773.3, and Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) and Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, as applicable. Those conditions of approval and mitigation measures shall be included in an appendix to the reclamation plan or plan amendment and shall be considered part of the reclamation compliance requirements and subject to the annual inspection requirements.
(c)To the extent there is a conflict between the comments of a trustee agency or a responsible agency that are based on that agencys statutory or regulatory authority and the comments of other commenting agencies that are received by the lead agency pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) regarding a reclamation plan or plan amendments, the lead agency shall consider only the comments of the trustee agency or responsible agency.
(d)Nothing in this section is intended to limit or expand the departments authority or responsibility to review a document in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
SEC. 9.SEC. 8.Section 2773.1 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2773.1.(a)Lead agencies shall require financial assurances of each surface mining operation to ensure reclamation is performed in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan, as follows:
(1)A financial assurance mechanism may take the form of surety bonds executed by an admitted surety insurer, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 995.120 of the Code of Civil Procedure, irrevocable letters of credit, trust funds, or other forms of financial assurances specified by the board pursuant to subdivision (e) that the lead agency reasonably determines are adequate to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan.
(2)The financial assurances shall remain in effect for the duration of the surface mining operation and any additional period until reclamation is completed.
(3)The amount of financial assurances required of a surface mining operation for any one year shall be reviewed and, if necessary, adjusted once each calendar year to account for new lands disturbed by surface mining operations, inflation, and reclamation of lands accomplished in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. An operator shall be required to replace an approved financial assurance mechanism to bond for the reclamation of the surface mining operation only if the financial assurance cost estimate identifies a need to increase the amount of the financial assurance mechanism.
(4)Financial assurance cost estimates shall be submitted to the lead agency for review on a form developed by the director and approved by the board. The form shall be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code).
(4)
(5)Each financial assurance mechanism shall be made payable to the lead agency and the department. A financial assurance mechanism shall not be released without the consent of the lead agency and the department. A financial assurance mechanism that was approved by the lead agency prior to January 1, 1993, and was made payable to the State Geologist shall be considered payable to the department for purposes of this chapter. However, if a surface mining operation has received approval of its financial assurances from a public agency other than the lead agency, the lead agency shall deem those financial assurances adequate for purposes of this section, or shall credit them toward fulfillment of the financial assurances required by this section, if they are made payable to the public agency, the lead agency, and the department and otherwise meet the requirements of this section. In any event, if a lead agency and one or more public agencies exercise jurisdiction over a surface mining operation, the total amount of financial assurances required by the lead agency and the public agencies for any one year shall not exceed that amount that is necessary to perform reclamation of lands remaining disturbed. For purposes of this paragraph, a public agency may include a federal agency.
(b)(1)If the lead agency, or the board when acting as a lead agency, has evidence that an operator may be financially incapable of completing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan or that the operator may have abandoned the surface mining operation without completing reclamation, the lead agency or the board, when acting as a lead agency, shall conduct a public hearing to determine whether the operator is financially capable of completing reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan or has abandoned the surface mining operation. The hearing shall be noticed to the operator and the director at least 30 days prior to the hearing.
(2)If the lead agency or the board, following the public hearing conducted pursuant to paragraph (1), determines that the operator is financially incapable of performing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan or has abandoned its surface mining operation without completing reclamation, either the lead agency or the director shall do all of the following:
(A)Notify the operator by personal service or certified mail that the lead agency or the director intends to take appropriate action to forfeit the financial assurances and specify the reasons for so doing.
(B)Proceed to take appropriate action to require forfeiture of the financial assurances.
(C)Use the proceeds from the forfeited financial assurances to conduct and complete reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. If the surface mining operation cannot be reclaimed in accordance with its approved reclamation plan, or the financial assurances are inadequate to reclaim in accordance with its approved reclamation plan, the lead agency or director may use forfeited financial assurances to reclaim or remediate mining disturbances as appropriate for the site conditions as determined by both the lead agency and the director. The financial assurances shall not be used for any other purpose. The operator is responsible for the costs of conducting and completing reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan or a remediation plan developed pursuant to this section as determined appropriate by both the lead agency and the director that are in excess of the proceeds from the forfeited financial assurances.
(c)Financial assurances shall no longer be required of a surface mining operation, and shall be released, upon the written concurrence of the lead agency and the director, which shall be forwarded to the operator and the institutions providing or holding the financial assurance mechanism, that reclamation has been completed in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. If a surface mining operation is sold or ownership is transferred to another person, the existing financial assurances shall remain in force and shall not be released by the lead agency and the director until new financial assurances are secured from the new owner and have been approved by the lead agency in accordance with Sections 2770, 2773.1, and 2773.4. Within 90 days of the sale or transfer of a surface mining operation, the new operator shall submit an appropriate financial assurance mechanism, which may be the existing mechanism if the existing mechanism is payable in the event of the new operators default, financial incapability or abandonment of the surface mining operation, that is subject to review by the lead agency and the director pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2773.4. Within 15 days of the sale or transfer of a surface mining operation, the new operator shall sign a new statement of reclamation responsibility in accordance with paragraph (10) of subdivision (c) of Section 2772.
(d)The lead agency shall have primary responsibility to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and to reclaim mine sites pursuant to subdivision (b). However, if the board is not the lead agency pursuant to Section 2774.4, the director may act to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and reclaim mine sites pursuant to subdivision (b) only if both of the following occurs:
(1)The financial incapability of the operator or the abandonment of the surface mining operation has come to the attention of the director.
(2)The lead agency has been notified in writing by the director of the financial incapability of the operator or the abandonment of the surface mining operation for at least 15 days, the lead agency has not taken appropriate measures to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances and reclaim the mine site, and one of the following has occurred:
(A)The lead agency has been notified in writing by the director that failure to take appropriate measures to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances or to reclaim the mine site shall result in actions being taken against the lead agency under Section 2774.4.
(B)The director determines that there is a violation that amounts to an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health, safety, or to the environment.
(C)The lead agency notifies the director in writing that its good faith attempts to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances have not been successful.
The director shall comply with subdivision (b) in seeking forfeiture of financial assurances and reclaiming mine sites.
(e)The board may adopt regulations specifying financial assurance mechanisms other than surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, and trust funds, which the board determines are reasonably available and adequate to ensure reclamation pursuant to this chapter, but these mechanisms shall not include financial tests or surety bonds executed by one or more personal sureties. These mechanisms may include reclamation bond pool programs.
(f)The board shall adopt or revise guidelines to implement this section as necessary. The guidelines are exempt from the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code), and are not subject to review by the Office of Administrative Law.
SEC. 10.SEC. 9.Section 2773.4 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2773.4.(a)(1)Prior to approving the financial assurances for a new reclamation plan or adjustments to financial assurances based on an amendment to a reclamation plan, the lead agency shall submit the financial assurance cost estimate to the director for review.
(2)The lead agency shall provide the director with a determination that the financial assurance cost estimate submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) is adequate, complete, and consistent with Section 2773.1, Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and the boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1.
(3)All documentation submitted to the director pursuant to this subdivision shall be submitted at one time.
(b)No later than 15 days after receiving a financial assurance cost estimate, the director shall notify the lead agency and the operator if the submission is incomplete. An incomplete submission is one that does not meet the content requirements of Section 2773.1, Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and the boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1. The directors notice shall specifically identify all aspects of the submission that are incomplete. The directors time to review the financial assurance cost estimate shall commence upon the receipt of a submission that contains the aspects identified in the directors notice to the lead agency.
(c)(1)The director shall have 45 days from the date of receipt of a complete financial assurance cost estimate to prepare written comments if the director chooses.
(2)The lead agency shall evaluate written comments received from the director relating to the financial assurance cost estimate within a reasonable amount of time. The lead agency shall prepare a written response to the directors comments describing the disposition of the major issues raised by the directors comments.
(3)The lead agency shall submit its proposed response to the director at least 30 days prior to approval of the financial assurance cost estimate. The lead agencys response shall include either of the following:
(A)A description of how the lead agency proposes to adopt the directors comments to the financial assurance cost estimate.
(B)A detailed description of the reasons why the lead agency proposes to not adopt the directors comments.
(4)Copies of any written comments received and responses prepared by the lead agency shall be forwarded to the operator.
(5)(A)If the lead agency, in its written response to the directors comments, proposes to not adopt the directors comments relating to the financial assurance cost estimate, the director, within 15 days of receipt of the lead agencys written response, may request in writing a consultation with the lead agency to discuss the directors comments and the lead agencys response. The request shall include an invitation to the operator to participate in the consultation. The consultation may be conducted in person, electronically, telephonically, or by any means convenient to the parties.
(B)If the director requests a consultation pursuant to this subdivision, the lead agency shall not approve the financial assurance cost estimate until after consulting with the director. The consultation shall occur not later than 30 days after the directors request unless an alternate timeframe is mutually agreed upon by the director, lead agency, and operator.
(6)(A)The lead agency shall give the director at least 30 days notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing at which the financial assurance cost estimate is scheduled to be approved by the lead agency. If no hearing is required by this chapter, local ordinance, or other state law, then the lead agency shall provide 30 days notice to the director that it intends to approve the financial assurance cost estimate.
(B)The lead agency shall send to the director its final response to the directors comments within 30 days following its approval of the financial assurance cost estimate, during which time the department retains all of its powers, duties, and authority pursuant to this chapter.
(d)(1)(A)Within 30 days of an annual inspection being conducted pursuant to Section 2774, an operator shall provide an annual financial assurance cost estimate to the lead agency for review.
(B)If the lead agency fails to cause the inspection of the surface mining operation on the date requested by the operator pursuant to Section 2207 or on an alternate the date set by the lead agency pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774, the operator shall provide an annual financial assurance cost estimate to the lead agency for review within 30 days of the missed applicable inspection date, unless the lead agency causes the inspection to occur within that time period, in which case the operator shall provide an annual financial assurance cost estimate to the lead agency within 30 days of the date of the inspection.
(2)(A)Within 60 days of receiving an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate, the lead agency shall do one of the following:
(i)Deny the financial assurance cost estimate pursuant to paragraph (6).
(ii)Submit the financial assurance cost estimate to the director for review.
(B)The lead agency shall provide the director with a determination that the annual financial assurance cost estimate submitted is adequate, complete, and consistent with Section 2773.1, Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and the boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1.
(3)All documentation submitted to the director pursuant to this subdivision shall be submitted at one time.
(4)Within 15 days of receiving an annual financial assurance cost estimate, the director shall notify the lead agency and the operator if the submission is incomplete. An incomplete submission is one that does not meet the content requirements of Section 2773.1, Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and the boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1. The directors notice shall specifically identify all aspects of the submission that are incomplete. The directors time to review the annual financial assurance cost estimate shall commence upon the receipt of a submission that contains the aspects identified in the directors notice to the lead agency.
(5)(A)Within 45 days of receiving an operators complete annual financial assurance cost estimate from the lead agency, the director shall prepare written comments on the operators annual financial assurance cost estimate and provide the comments to the lead agency and the operator if the director so chooses.
(B)(i)Within 30 days from receiving the directors written comments pursuant to this subdivision, the lead agency shall evaluate the written comments and provide the director and operator its proposed response to the director.
(ii)The lead agency shall submit its proposed response to the director at least 30 days prior to approving the annual financial assurance cost estimate. The lead agencys response shall include either of the following:
(I)A description of how the lead agency proposes to adopt the directors comments to the annual financial assurance cost estimate.
(II)A detailed description of the reasons why the lead agency proposes not to adopt the directors comments.
(iii)Copies of any written comments received and responses prepared by the lead agency pursuant to this subparagraph shall be provided to the operator.
(C)(i)If the lead agency, in its written response to the directors comments, proposes to not adopt the directors comments concerning the annual financial assurance cost estimate, the director, within 15 days of receipt of the lead agencys written response, may request in writing a consultation with the lead agency to discuss the directors comments and the lead agencys response. The request shall include an invitation to the operator to participate in the consultation. The consultation may be conducted in person, electronically, telephonically, or by any means convenient to the parties.
(ii)If the director requests a consultation pursuant to this subparagraph, the lead agency shall not approve the annual financial assurance cost estimate until after consulting with the director. The consultation shall occur not later than 30 days after the directors request unless an alternate timeframe is mutually agreed upon by the director, lead agency, and operator.
(D)(i)Within 60 days of receiving the directors written comments, or of a consultation pursuant to this subdivision, whichever is later or the due date of the directors written comments if none are received, the lead agency shall approve or deny an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate.
(ii)The lead agency shall give the director at least 30 days notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing at which the annual financial assurance cost estimate is scheduled to be approved by the lead agency.
(iii)If no hearing is required by this chapter, local ordinance, or other state law, the lead agency shall provide 30 days notice to the director that it intends to approve the annual financial assurance cost estimate.
(E)Within 30 days of the lead agencys approval of the annual financial assurance cost estimate, the lead agency shall send the director its final response to the directors comments.
(6)If the lead agency determines an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate is inadequate, the lead agency shall specify the reasons for that determination. The operator shall have 30 days to appeal that denial pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2770 or provide a revised financial assurance cost estimate incorporating the suggested changes to the lead agency for approval by the lead agency pursuant to this section.
(e)(1)Within 30 days of the lead agencys approval of a financial assurance cost estimate pursuant to this section, the operator shall provide the lead agency and the director an appropriate financial assurance mechanism.
(2)(A)Within 15 days of receiving a financial assurance mechanism pursuant to this subdivision, or subdivision (c) of Section 2773.1 the lead agency and the director shall review the financial assurance mechanism to determine if the type of mechanism, including the release instructions, meets the requirements of this chapter.
(B)Financial assurance mechanisms determined to be noncompliant with this chapter shall be returned to the operator with instructions on how to correct the type or release instructions of the financial assurance mechanism.
(3)By July 1, 2017, 2018, the board shall adopt forms to implement this subdivision as necessary. The forms shall be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code).
(f)The review and approval of financial assurances pursuant to this chapter shall not be considered a project for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
SEC. 11.SEC. 10.Section 2774 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.(a)Every lead agency shall adopt ordinances in accordance with state policy that establish procedures for the review and approval of reclamation plans and financial assurances and the issuance of a permit to conduct surface mining operations, except that any lead agency without an active surface mining operation in its jurisdiction may defer adopting an implementing ordinance until the filing of a permit application. The ordinances shall establish procedures requiring at least one public hearing and shall be periodically reviewed by the lead agency and revised, as necessary, to ensure that the ordinances continue to be in accordance with state policy.
(b)(1)The lead agency shall cause surface mining operations to be inspected in intervals of no more than 12 months, solely to determine whether the surface mining operation is in compliance with this chapter. The lead agency shall cause an inspection to be conducted by a state-licensed geologist, state-licensed civil engineer, state-licensed landscape architect, state-licensed forester, or a qualified lead agency employee who is qualified and experienced in land reclamation and who has not been employed by the surface mining operation being inspected in any capacity during the previous 12 months, except that a qualified lead agency employee may inspect surface mining operations conducted by another department within the local agency. All inspections shall be conducted using a form developed by the department and approved by the board that includes the professional licensing and disciplinary information of the person who conducted the inspection. The operator shall be solely responsible for the reasonable cost of the inspection. The lead agency shall provide a notice of completion of inspection to the director within 90 days of conducting the inspection. The notice shall contain a statement regarding the surface mining operations compliance with this chapter and a copy of the completed inspection form, and shall specify, as applicable, all of the following:
(A)Aspects of the surface mining operation, if any, that were found to be inconsistent with this chapter but were corrected before the submission of the inspection form to the director.
(B)Aspects of the surface mining operation, if any, that were found to be inconsistent with this chapter but were not corrected before the submission of the inspection form to the director.
(C)A statement describing the lead agencys intended response to any aspects of the surface mining operation found to be inconsistent with this chapter but were not corrected before the submission of the inspection form to the director.
(2)If the surface mining operation has a review of its reclamation plan, financial assurances, or an interim management plan pending under subdivision (b) or (h) of Section 2770, or an appeal pending before the board or lead agency governing body under subdivision (e) or (h) of Section 2770, the notice shall so indicate. The lead agency shall forward to the operator a copy of the notice, a copy of the completed inspection form, and any supporting documentation, including, but not limited to, any inspection report prepared by the geologist, civil engineer, landscape architect, forester, or qualified lead agency employee who conducted the inspection.
(c)If an operator does not request an inspection date on the annual report filed pursuant to Section 2207 or if the lead agency is unable to cause the inspection of a given surface mining operation on the date requested by the operator, the lead agency shall provide the operator with a minimum of five days written notice of a pending inspection or a lesser time period if agreed to by the operator.
(d)No later than July 1 of each year, the lead agency shall submit to the director for each active or idle surface mining operation within the lead agencys jurisdiction the following information:
(1)A copy of any permit or reclamation plan amendments, as applicable.
(2)A statement that there have been no changes during the previous year, as applicable.
(3)The date of each surface mining operations last inspection.
(4)The date of each surface mining operations last financial assurance review pursuant to Section 2773.1 for each operation listed.
(e)(1)No later than December 31, 2016, 2017, the department shall establish a training program for all surface mine inspectors. The program shall be designed to include a guidance document, developed by the department, in consultation with the board and stakeholders, to provide instruction and recommendations to surface mine inspectors performing inspections pursuant to subdivision (b).
(2)The training program shall include inspections inspection workshops offered by the department in different regions of the state to provide practical application of the guidance document material.
(3)On and after July 1, 2019, 2020, all inspectors shall have on file with the lead agency and the department a certificate of completion of an inspection workshop. An inspector shall attend a workshop no later than five years after the date of his or her most recent certificate.
(4)The adoption of the guidance document by the department pursuant to this subdivision shall be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code).
SEC. 12.SEC. 11.Section 2774.1 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.1.(a)(1)Except as provided in subdivision (i) of Section 2770, if the lead agency or the director determines, based upon an annual inspection pursuant to Section 2774, or otherwise confirmed by an inspection of the surface mining operation, that a surface mining operation is not in compliance with this chapter, the lead agency or the director may issue a notice of that violation to the operator by personal service or certified mail. If the lead agency issues the notice, the lead agency shall send a copy of the notice to the director. The notice shall include both of the following:
(A)A description of the violation.
(B)Actions the operator shall take to correct the violation.
(2)(A)If a lead agency or the director determines that the time to correct the noticed violation will exceed 30 days, the lead agency and the operator may enter into a stipulated order to comply, with notice sent to the director. If the director initiated the enforcement action, the director, after consulting with the lead agency, may enter into a stipulated order to comply with the operator. The lead agency may, but need not, join the stipulated order with the director.
(B)A stipulated order to comply shall include a schedule and time for compliance that the lead agency or the director, as applicable, determines is reasonable after taking into account the actions and legal processes required to correct the violation.
(3)(A)If the operator does not comply with a notice issued pursuant to paragraph (1) within 30 days of being served the notice or commit to enter into a stipulated order to comply pursuant to paragraph (2) within 30 days of being served the notice, the lead agency or the director may issue an order to comply by personal service or certified mail requiring the operator to comply with this chapter or, if the operator does not have an approved reclamation plan or financial assurances, cease all further surface mining activities.
(B)An order to comply issued pursuant to this paragraph shall take effect 30 days following the service of the order to comply unless within those 30 days the operator appeals the order to comply and requests a hearing before the lead agency agency, if the lead agency issued the order, or the board, depending on who issued the order to comply concerning the alleged violation. if the director issued the order. An order to comply issued pursuant to this paragraph shall specify all of the following:
(i)Which aspects of the surface mining operation are inconsistent with this chapter.
(ii)A time for compliance that the lead agency or director determines is reasonable, taking into account the seriousness of the alleged violation and any good faith efforts to comply with applicable requirements.
(iii)The actions and legal processes required to correct the alleged violation.
(C)An appeal filed pursuant to subparagraph (B) shall be noticed and heard at a public hearing within 45 days of the filing of the appeal or a longer period as may be mutually agreed upon by the operator and the lead agency agency, if the lead agency issued the order, or the operator and the director, depending on who issued the order to comply. if the director issued the order.
(b)[Reserved]
(c)An operator who violates or fails to comply with an order to comply issued under subdivision (a) after the orders effective date or who fails to submit a report or pay annual fees to the director or lead agency as required by Section 2207, shall be subject to an order by the lead agency or the director imposing an administrative penalty of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) per day, assessed from the original date of noncompliance with this chapter, including Section 2207, or from the date of the inspection when the violation was identified, at the discretion of the issuer of the notice of that violation. The penalty may be imposed administratively by the lead agency or the director. In determining the amount of the administrative penalty, the lead agency or the director shall take into consideration the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation or violations, any prior history of violations, the degree of culpability, economic savings, if any, resulting from the violation, and any other matters justice may require. Orders setting administrative penalties shall become effective upon issuance of the assessment and payment shall be made to the lead agency or the director within 30 days, unless the operator petitions the legislative body of the lead agency, the board, or the superior court for review as provided in Section 2774.2. An order shall be served by personal service or by certified mail upon the operator. Penalties collected by the director shall not be used for purposes other than to cover the reasonable costs incurred by the director in implementing this chapter or Section 2207.
(d)(1)An operator who violates or fails to comply with an order to comply issued pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) or a stipulated order to comply entered into pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) after the orders effective date shall be removed from the list published by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2717.
(2)If after a public hearing the board or lead agency denies an appeal by the operator pursuant to subdivision (b), subparagraph (C) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), the operator shall be removed 10 working days following the denial of the appeal from the list published by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2717.
(3)If the operator enters into a stipulated order to comply between the operator and the lead agency agency, if the lead agency issued the order, or the operator and the director director, if the director issued the order, within 10 working days of the denial of the appeal and the stipulated order to comply is consistent with the order to comply upheld by the board or lead agency and includes a stipulated schedule for compliance, the operator shall remain on the list published by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2717.
(4)Issuance of a notice pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) or an order to comply or stipulated order to comply pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (a) shall not disqualify an operator from eligibility for placement on the list published by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2717.
(e)If the lead agency or the director determines that the surface mine is not in compliance with this chapter, so that the surface mine presents an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or the environment, the lead agency or the Attorney General, on behalf of the director, may seek an order from a court of competent jurisdiction enjoining that operation.
(f)Upon a complaint by the director, the department, or the board, the Attorney General may bring an action to recover administrative penalties under this section, and penalties under Section 2207, in any court of competent jurisdiction in this state against any person violating any provision of this chapter or Section 2207, or any regulation adopted pursuant to this chapter or Section 2207. The Attorney General may bring this action on his or her own initiative if, after examining the complaint and the evidence, he or she believes a violation has occurred. The Attorney General may also seek an order from a court of competent jurisdiction compelling the operator to comply with this chapter and Section 2207.
(g)(1)The lead agency has primary responsibility for enforcing this chapter and Section 2207. In cases where the board is not the lead agency pursuant to Section 2774.4, enforcement actions may be initiated by the director pursuant to this section only after the violation has come to the attention of the director and either of the following occurs:
(A)The lead agency has been notified by the director in writing of the violation for at least 30 days, and has not taken appropriate enforcement action, which may include failing to issue an order to comply within a reasonable time after issuing a notice of violation.
(B)The director determines that there is a violation that amounts to an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or safety, or to the environment.
(2)The director shall comply with this section in initiating enforcement actions.
(h)Remedies under this section are in addition to, and do not supersede or limit, any and all other remedies, civil or criminal.
SEC. 13.SEC. 12.Section 2774.2 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.2.(a)Within 30 days of the issuance of an order setting administrative penalties under subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1, the operator may petition the legislative body of the lead agency, if the lead agency has issued the order, or the board for orders issued by the director, for review of the order. If the operator does not petition for review within the time limits set by this subdivision, the order setting administrative penalties shall not be subject to review by any court or agency.
(b)The legislative body of the lead agency or the board shall notify the operator by personal service or certified mail whether it will review the order setting administrative penalties. In reviewing an order pursuant to this section, the record shall consist of the record before the lead agency or the director and any other relevant evidence which, in the judgment of the legislative body or the board, should be considered to effectuate and implement the policies of this chapter.
(c)The legislative body or the board may affirm, modify, or set aside, in whole or in part, by its own order an order of the lead agency or the director setting administrative penalties reviewed by the legislative body or the board pursuant to this section.
(d)An order of the legislative body or the board issued under subdivision (c) shall become effective upon its issuance unless the operator petitions the superior court for review as provided in subdivision (e). An order shall be served by personal service or by certified mail upon the operator. Payment of an administrative penalty that is specified in an order issued pursuant to subdivision (c) shall be made to the lead agency or the director within 30 days of service of the order. However, the payment shall be held in an interest bearing impound account pending the resolution of a petition for review filed pursuant to subdivision (e).
(e)An operator aggrieved by an order of the legislative body or the board issued pursuant to subdivision (c) may obtain review of the order by filing in the superior court a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days following the issuance of the order. An operator aggrieved by an order of a lead agency or the director setting administrative penalties pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1, for which the legislative body or board denies review, may obtain review of the order in the superior court by filing in the court a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days following the denial of review. The provisions of Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall govern judicial proceedings pursuant to this subdivision, except that in every case the court shall exercise its independent judgment. If the operator does not petition for a writ of mandate within the time limits set by this subdivision, an order of the board or the legislative body shall not be subject to review by any court or agency.
(f)(1)After the expiration of the time to petition for review pursuant to subdivision (a) or (e), the director or the board acting as the lead agency may apply to the small claims court or the superior court, depending on the jurisdictional amount, in the county where the administrative penalty was imposed for a judgment to collect the unpaid administrative penalty imposed pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1. The application shall include all of the following:
(A)The order setting the administrative penalty pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1.
(B)A notice to the operator of the right to petition for review of the order.
(C)Either of the following:
(i)A declaration from the board that no petition was made or that the board declined to review the petition.
(ii)A copy of the final order of the board.
(2)An application submitted pursuant to this subdivision shall constitute a sufficient showing to warrant the issuance of the judgment. The court clerk shall enter the judgment immediately in conformity with the application.
(3)The judgment entered pursuant to this subdivision shall have the same force and effect as, and shall be subject to all the provisions of law relating to, a judgment in a civil action and may be enforced in the same manner as any other judgment of the court. The court shall make enforcement of the judgment a priority.
SEC. 14.SEC. 13.Section 2774.4 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.4.(a)The board shall exercise some or all of a lead agencys powers under this chapter pursuant to subdivision (c), except for permitting authority and vested rights determinations, if the board finds that a lead agency has done any of the following:
(1)Approved reclamation plans or financial assurances that are not consistent with this chapter.
(2)Failed to inspect or cause the inspection of surface mining operations as required by this chapter.
(3)Failed to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and to carry out reclamation of surface mining operations as required by this chapter.
(4)Failed to take appropriate enforcement actions as required by this chapter.
(5)Intentionally misrepresented the results of inspections required under this chapter.
(6)Failed to submit information to the department as required by this chapter.
(b)The board shall conduct a public hearing no sooner than three years after the board has taken action pursuant to subdivision (a) to determine if a lead agency has corrected its deficiencies in implementing and enforcing this chapter and the rules and regulations adopted pursuant to this chapter. If the board finds the lead agency has corrected some or all of its deficiencies in implementing and enforcing this chapter, the board shall restore to the lead agency some or all of the powers assumed by the board pursuant to subdivision (a).
(c)(1)Before taking any action pursuant to subdivision (a), the board shall first notify the lead agency of the identified deficiencies and allow the lead agency 45 days to provide a response to the board on the identified deficiencies. The board may review the lead agencys response at a regularly scheduled meeting.
(2)(A)If the board is not satisfied with the lead agencys response, the board shall hold a public hearing within the lead agencys area of jurisdiction, upon a 45-day written notice given to the public in at least one newspaper of general circulation within the city or county and directly mailed to the lead agency and to all operators within the lead agencys jurisdiction who have submitted reports as required by Section 2207.
(B)At the hearing, the board shall determine if the lead agency has engaged in the conduct described in subdivision (a). If the board finds that the lead agency has engaged in conduct described in subdivision (a), the board shall do either of the following:
(i)Require the lead agency to develop a remedial plan to correct the noted deficiencies. The remedial plan shall describe specific objectives and corresponding processes designed to address, at a minimum, the noted deficiencies and a time that the remedial plan will be fully implemented. The board shall set a hearing to review the completion of the remedial plan consistent with paragraph (2) and subdivisions (d) and (e).
(ii)Take immediate action pursuant to subdivision (a).
(d)Affected operators and interested persons have the right at the public hearing to present oral and written evidence on the matter being considered. At the public hearing, the board may place reasonable limits on the right of affected operators and interested persons to question and solicit testimony.
(e)(1)If the board decides to take action pursuant to subdivision (a) and exercise some or all of a lead agencys powers under this chapter, except for permitting authority and vested rights determinations, the board, based on the record of the public hearing, shall adopt written findings that explain all of the following:
(A)The action to be taken by the board.
(B)Why the board decided to take the action.
(C)Why the action is authorized by and meets the requirements of subdivision (a).
(2)In addition, the boards findings shall address the significant issues raised, or written evidence presented, by affected operators, interested persons, the lead agency, or the department. The transcript of testimony and exhibits, together with all papers and requests filed in the proceedings, shall constitute the exclusive record for decision by the board.
(f)If the board finds at the hearing held pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) that the lead agency has not completed the remedial plan prepared pursuant to clause (i) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) to the boards satisfaction, the board shall follow the procedures set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) and subdivisions (d) and (e). If the board finds at the hearing held pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) that the lead agency has completed the remedial plan prepared pursuant to clause (i) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) to the boards satisfaction, the board shall conclude the action it has taken pursuant to this section.
(g)The lead agency, any affected operator, or any interested person who has presented oral or written evidence at the public hearing before the board pursuant to subdivision (d) may obtain review of the boards action taken pursuant to subdivision (a) by filing in the superior court a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days following the issuance of the boards decision. Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure governs judicial proceedings pursuant to this subdivision, except that in every case the court shall exercise its independent judgment. If a petition for a writ of mandate is not filed within the time limits set by this subdivision, the boards action under subdivision (a) shall not be subject to review by any court or agency.
SEC. 15.SEC. 14.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
SEC. 16.SEC. 15.This act shall become operative only if both this bill and Senate Bill 209 of the 201516 Regular Session are enacted and become operative. operative on or before January 1, 2017.
(a)The owner or the operator of a mining operation within the state shall forward to the director annually, not later than a date established by the director, upon forms approved by the board from time to time, a report that identifies and contains all of the following:
(1)The name, address, and telephone number of the person, company, or other owner of the mining operation.
(2)The name, address, and telephone number of a designated agent who resides in this state, and who will receive and accept service of all orders, notices, and processes of the lead agency, board, director, or court.
(3)The location of the mining operation, its name, its mine number as issued by the Office of Mine Reclamation or the director, its section, township, range, latitude, longitude, and approximate boundaries of the mining operation marked on a United States Geological Survey 71/2-minute or 15-minute quadrangle map.
(4)The lead agency.
(5)The approval date of the mining operations reclamation plan.
(6)The mining operations status as active, idle, reclaimed, or in the process of being reclaimed.
(7)The commodities produced by the mine and the type of mining operation.
(8)A copy of the previously completed annual inspection form and a requested date date, within 12 months of the prior inspection date, for the next annual inspection by the lead agency.
(9)Proof of financial assurances.
(10)Ownership of the property, including government agencies, if applicable, by the assessors parcel number, and total assessed value of the mining operation.
(11)The approximate permitted size of the mining operation subject to Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), in acres.
(12)The approximate total acreage of land newly disturbed by the mining operation during the previous calendar year.
(13)The approximate total of disturbed acreage reclaimed during the previous calendar year.
(14)The approximate total unreclaimed disturbed acreage remaining as of the end of the calendar year.
(15)The total production for each mineral commodity produced during the previous year.
(16)A copy of any approved reclamation plan and any amendments or conditions of approval to any existing reclamation plan approved by the lead agency.
(b)(1)Every year, not later than the date established by the director, the person submitting the report pursuant to subdivision (a) shall forward to the lead agency, upon forms furnished by the board, a report that provides all of the information specified in subdivision (a).
(2)The owner or operator of a mining operation shall allow access to the property to any governmental agency or the agent of any company providing financial assurances in connection with the reclamation plan in order that the reclamation can be carried out by the entity or company, in accordance with the provisions of the reclamation plan.
(c)Subsequent reports shall include only changes in the information submitted for the items described in subdivision (a), except that, instead of the approved reclamation plan, the reports shall include any reclamation plan amendments approved during the previous year. The reports shall state whether review of a reclamation plan, financial assurances, or an interim management plan is pending under subdivision (b), (c), (d), (b) or (h) of Section 2770, or whether an appeal before the board or lead agency governing body is pending under subdivision (e) or (h) of Section 2770. The director shall notify the person submitting the report and the owners designated agent in writing that the report and the fee required pursuant to subdivision (d) have been received, specify the mining operations mine number if one has not been issued by the Office of Mine Reclamation, and notify the person and agent of any deficiencies in the report within 90 days of receipt. That person or agent shall have 30 days from receipt of the notification to correct the noted deficiencies and forward the revised report to the director and the lead agency. Any person who fails to comply with this section, or knowingly provides incorrect or false information in reports required by this section, may be subject to an administrative penalty as provided in subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1.
(d)(1)The board shall impose, by regulation, pursuant to paragraph (2), an annual reporting fee on, and method for collecting annual fees from, each active or idle mining operation. The maximum fee for any single mining operation may not exceed four thousand dollars ($4,000) annually and may not be less than one hundred dollars ($100) annually, as adjusted for the cost of living as measured by the California Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers, calendar year averages, using the percentage change in the previous year, beginning with the 200506 fiscal year and annually thereafter.
(2)(A)The board shall adopt, by regulation, a schedule of fees authorized under paragraph (1) to cover the departments cost in carrying out this section and Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), as reflected in the Governors proposed Budget, and may adopt those regulations as emergency regulations. In establishing the schedule of fees to be paid by each active and idle mining operation, the fees shall be calculated on an equitable basis reflecting the size and type of operation. The board shall also consider the total assessed value of the mining operation, the acreage disturbed by mining activities, and the acreage subject to the reclamation plan.
(B)Regulations adopted pursuant to this subdivision shall be adopted by the board in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code). The adoption of any emergency regulations pursuant to this subdivision shall be considered necessary to address an emergency and shall be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, and general welfare.
(3)The total revenue generated by the reporting fees may not exceed, and may be less than, the amount of three million five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000), as adjusted for the cost of living as measured by the California Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers, calendar year averages, using the percentage change in the previous year, beginning with the 200506 fiscal year and annually thereafter. If the director determines that the revenue collected during the preceding fiscal year was greater or less than the cost to operate the program, the board shall adjust the fees to compensate for the overcollection or undercollection of revenues.
(4)(A)The reporting fees established pursuant to this subdivision shall be deposited in the Mine Reclamation Account, which is hereby created. Any fees, penalties, interest, fines, or charges collected by the director or board pursuant to this chapter or Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710) shall be deposited in the Mine Reclamation Account. The money in the account shall be available to the department and board, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purpose of carrying out this section and complying with Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), which includes, but is not limited to, classification and designation of areas with mineral resources of statewide or regional significance, reclamation plan and financial assurance review, mine inspection, and enforcement.
(B)(i)In addition to reporting fees, the board shall collect five dollars ($5) per ounce of gold and ten cents ($0.10) per ounce of silver mined within the state and shall deposit the fees collected in the Abandoned Mine Reclamation and Minerals Fund Subaccount, which is hereby created in the Mine Reclamation Account. The department may expend the moneys in the subaccount, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for only the purposes of Section 2796.5 and as authorized herein for the remediation of abandoned mines.
(ii)Notwithstanding subdivision (j) of Section 2796.5, fees collected pursuant to clause (i) may also be used to remediate features of historic abandoned mines and lands that they impact. For the purposes of this section, historic abandoned mines are mines for which operations have been conducted before January 1, 1976, and include, but are not limited to, historic gold and silver mines.
(5)In case of late payment of the reporting fee, a penalty of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) or 10 percent of the amount due, whichever is greater, plus interest at the rate of 11/2 percent per month, computed from the delinquent date of the assessment until and including the date of payment, shall be assessed. New mining operations that have not submitted a report shall submit a report prior to commencement of operations. The new operation shall submit its fee according to the reasonable fee schedule adopted by the board, and the month that the report is received shall become that operations anniversary month.
(e)The lead agency, or the board when acting as the lead agency, may impose a fee upon each mining operation to cover the reasonable costs incurred in implementing this chapter and Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710).
(f)For purposes of this section, mining operation means a mining operation of any kind or character whatever in this state, including, but not limited to, a mining operation that is classified as a surface mining operation as defined in Section 2735, unless excepted by Section 2714. For the purposes of fee collections only, mining operation may include one or more mines operated by a single operator or mining company on one or more sites, if the total annual combined mineral production for all sites is less than 100 troy ounces for precious metals, if precious metals are the primary mineral commodity produced, or less than 100,000 short tons if the primary mineral commodity produced is not precious metals.
(g)Any information in reports submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) that includes or otherwise indicates the total mineral production, reserves, or rate of depletion of any mining operation may not be disclosed to any member of the public, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 6252 of the Government Code. Other portions of the reports are public records unless excepted by statute. Statistical bulletins based on these reports and published under Section 2205 shall be compiled to show, for the state as a whole and separately for each lead agency, the total of each mineral produced therein. In order not to disclose the production, reserves, or rate of depletion from any identifiable mining operation, no production figure shall be published or otherwise disclosed unless that figure is the aggregated production of not less than three mining operations. If the production figure for any lead agency would disclose the production, reserves, or rate of depletion of less than three mining operations or otherwise permit the reasonable inference of the production, reserves, or rate of depletion of any identifiable mining operation, that figure shall be combined with the same figure of not less than two other lead agencies without regard to the location of the lead agencies. The bulletin shall be published annually by June 30 or as soon thereafter as practicable.
(h)The approval of a form by the board pursuant to this section is not the adoption of a regulation for purposes of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code) and is not subject to that act.
SEC. 2.Section 2207.2 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2207.2.(a)No later than December 31, 2021, the director shall report to the Legislature on the expenditure of moneys in the Mine Reclamation Account, created pursuant to Section 2207. The report shall include all of the following:
(1)An overview of how the moneys expended over the prior five years have been allocated between classification and designation of areas with mineral resources of statewide or regional significance, reclamation plan and financial assurance review, mine inspection, enforcement, and any other activities that constituted more than 5 percent of expenditures.
(2)Information on the portion of the fees that have been collected from small construction aggregate providers with under 50,000 tons of production.
(3)Information on the percentage of the fees that have been paid by metallic mineral operations.
(b)This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2026, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2026, deletes or extends that date.
SEC. 2.SEC. 3.Section 2715.5 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2715.5.(a)The Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, in conjunction with a site specific plan deemed consistent by the lead agency with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, until December 31, 2017, shall be considered to be a functional equivalent of a reclamation plan for the purposes of this chapter. No other reclamation plan shall be required to be reviewed and approved for any excavation project subject to the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan that is conducted in conformance with an approved site specific plan that is consistent with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan and the standards specified in that plan governing erosion control, channel stabilization, habitat restoration, flood control, or infrastructure maintenance, if that plan is reviewed and approved by a lead agency pursuant to this chapter.
(b)For the purposes of this section, the board of supervisors of the county in which the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan is to be implemented shall prepare and file the annual report required to be prepared pursuant to Section 2207.
(c)Nothing in this section precludes an enforcement action by the board or the department brought pursuant to this chapter or Section 2207 if the lead agency or the director determines that a surface mining operator, acting under the authority of the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, is not in compliance with the requirements of this chapter or Section 2207.
(d)For purposes of this section, site specific plan means an individual project plan approved by the lead agency that is consistent with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan. Site specific plans prepared in conformance with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan shall include, at a minimum, the information required pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2772, shall comply with the requirements of Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and shall be provided along with a financial assurance estimate to the department for review and comment pursuant to Section 2772.1 or 2773.4, as applicable. Notwithstanding the number of days authorized by subdivision (b) of Section 2772.1 or subdivision (c) of Section 2773.4, the department shall review the site specific plan and the financial assurance estimate and prepare any written comments within 15 days from the date of receipt of the plan and the estimate.
(e)Prior to engaging in an excavation activity in conformance with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, a surface mining operation shall be required to obtain financial assurances that meet the requirements of Section 2773.1.
(f)This section shall remain in effect only until December 31, 2017, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute that is enacted before December 31, 2017, deletes or extends that date.
SEC. 3.SEC. 4.Section 2733 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2733.Reclamation means the combined process of land treatment that minimizes water degradation, air pollution, damage to aquatic or wildlife habitat, flooding, erosion, and other adverse effects from surface mining operations, including adverse surface effects incidental to underground mines, so that mined lands are reclaimed to a usable condition that is readily adaptable for alternate land uses and create no danger to public health or safety. The process may extend to affected lands surrounding mined lands, and may require backfilling, grading, resoiling, revegetation, soil compaction, slope stabilization, or other measures.
SEC. 4.SEC. 5.Section 2736 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2736.Financial assurances means a current approved financial assurance cost estimate and a financial assurance mechanism that is at least equal to the current approved financial assurance cost estimate.
SEC. 5.SEC. 6.Section 2770 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2770.(a)Except as provided in this section, a person shall not conduct surface mining operations unless a permit is obtained from, a reclamation plan has been submitted to and approved by, and financial assurances for reclamation have been approved by the lead agency for the operation pursuant to this article.
(b)A person with an existing surface mining operation who has vested rights pursuant to Section 2776 and who does not have an approved reclamation plan shall submit a reclamation plan to the lead agency not later than March 31, 1988. If a reclamation plan application is not on file by March 31, 1988, the continuation of the surface mining operation is prohibited until a reclamation plan is submitted to the lead agency. For the purposes of this subdivision, a reclamation plan existing prior to January 1, 2016, may consist of all or the appropriate sections of any plans or written agreements previously approved by the lead agency or another agency, together with any additional documents needed to substantially meet the requirements of Sections 2772 and 2773 and the lead agency surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774, provided that all documents, which together were proposed to serve as the reclamation plan, are submitted for approval to the lead agency in accordance with this chapter.
(c)The review of financial assurances shall not be considered a project for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
(d)The lead agencys review of a reclamation plan submitted pursuant to subdivision (b) or of financial assurances pursuant to subdivision (c) is limited to whether the plan or the financial assurances substantially meet the applicable requirements of Sections 2772, 2773, 2773.1, and 2773.3 and the lead agency surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774, but, in any event, the lead agency shall require that financial assurances for reclamation be sufficient to perform reclamation of lands remaining disturbed. Reclamation plans or financial assurances determined to substantially meet these requirements shall be approved by the lead agency for purposes of this chapter. Reclamation plans or financial assurances determined not to substantially meet these requirements shall be returned to the operator within 60 days. The operator has 60 days to revise the plan or financial assurances to address identified deficiencies, at which time the revised plan or financial assurances shall be returned to the lead agency for review and approval. Except as specified in subdivision (e) or (i), unless the operator has filed on or before July 1, 1990, an appeal pursuant to subdivision (e) with regard to nonapproval of the reclamation plan, or has filed on or before January 1, 1994, an appeal pursuant to subdivision (e) with regard to nonapproval of financial assurances, and that appeal is pending before the board, the continuation of the surface mining operation is prohibited until a reclamation plan and financial assurances for reclamation are approved by the lead agency.
(c)[Reserved]
(d)[Reserved]
(e)(1)A person who can substantiate, based on the evidence of the record, that a lead agency has either (1) failed to act according to due process or has relied on considerations not related to the specific applicable requirements of Sections 2772, 2772.1, 2773, 2773.1, and 2773.3 2773.3, and 2773.4 and the lead agency surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774, 2774 in reaching a decision to deny approval of a reclamation plan or financial assurances for reclamation, or (2) failed to act within a reasonable time of receipt of a completed application, or (3) failed to review and approve reclamation plans or financial assurances as required by subdivision (d) or Sections 2772.1 and 2773.4, application may appeal that action or inaction to the board. If the director has commented pursuant to Section 2773.4 that a financial assurance cost estimate is inadequate, the director may appeal the lead agencys approval of a financial assurance cost estimate on any of the grounds identified in this subdivision that were included in the directors comments pursuant to Article 7 (commencing with Section 3680) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
(2)The director may appeal a lead agencys approval of a financial assurance cost estimate to the board if the director has commented pursuant to Section 2773.4 that the financial assurance cost estimate is inadequate based on consideration of the following:
(A)Section 2773.1.
(B)Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
(C)The boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1
(3)If the approved financial assurance cost estimate applies to a reclamation plan approved for a new surface mining operation, an expanded surface mining operation, or an interim financial assurance due to an order to comply, stipulated or otherwise, the operator shall provide a financial assurance mechanism pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2773.4 in the amount of the approved financial assurance cost estimate, notwithstanding an appeal filed pursuant to this subdivision and subject to modification pending the outcome of the appeal.
(4)If the approved financial assurance cost estimate is an update to an existing approved financial assurance cost estimate, the existing financial assurance mechanism shall remain in place and shall not be adjusted until a final determination by the board on the appeal filed pursuant to this subdivision.
(f)(1)The board may decline to hear an appeal if it determines that the appeal raises no substantial issues related to the lead agencys review pursuant to this section. decision to deny the approval of a reclamation plan or financial assurance, on the timeliness in reviewing a completed application, or on the approval of a financial assurance cost estimate that the director has commented is inadequate.
(2)If the board takes up an appeal, the appeal shall be scheduled and heard at a public hearing within 45 days of the filing of the appeal. If the appeal is filed by the director, a longer period may be mutually agreed upon by the board, the appellant, the director, and the operator, as applicable.
(g)Appeals that the board does not decline to hear shall be scheduled and heard at a public hearing within 45 days of the filing of the appeal or a longer period as may be mutually agreed upon by the board and the person filing the appeal. In hearing an appeal, the board shall only determine whether the reclamation plan or the financial assurances substantially meet the applicable requirements of Sections 2772, 2773, 2773.1, and 2773.3 and the lead agency surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774. A reclamation plan or financial assurances determined to meet these requirements shall be approved or upheld. A reclamation plan or financial assurances determined not to meet these requirements shall be returned with a notice of deficiencies, to the operator, who shall be granted, once only, a period of 30 days, or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the operator and the board, to correct the noted deficiencies and submit the revised reclamation plan or the revised financial assurances to the lead agency for review and approval.
(g)(1)(A)When hearing an appeal filed pursuant to subdivision (e), the board shall determine whether the reclamation plan or the financial assurance cost estimate substantially meets the applicable requirements of Sections 2772, 2772.1, 2773, 2773.1, 2773.3, and 2773.4 and the lead agencys surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774. The board shall approve or uphold a reclamation plan or financial assurance cost estimate determined to meet those applicable requirements.
(B)For purposes of this subdivision, substantially means actual compliance in respect to the substance and form requirements essential to the objectives of this chapter.
(2)(A)A reclamation plan determined not to meet the applicable requirements of Sections 2772, 2772.1, 2773, 2773.1, 2773.3, and 2773.4 and the lead agencys surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774 shall be returned to the operator with a notice of deficiencies. The operator shall be granted, once only, a period of 30 days or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the operator and the board to do both of the following:
(i)Correct the noted deficiencies.
(ii)Submit the revised reclamation plan to the lead agency for review and approval.
(B)Within 10 days of the hearing, the board shall provide notice via certified mail to the lead agency, the operator, and the department of the boards determination. The notice shall include instructions to the operator to submit to the lead agency for approval a revised reclamation plan consistent with the boards determination.
(3)(A)If the board determines the lead agencys approved financial assurance cost estimate does not meet the requirements of Sections 2773.1, 2773.4, Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and the boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1, the board shall note the deficiencies, and based on the record, include adequate cost estimates for each noted deficiency.
(B)Within 10 days of the hearing, the board shall provide notice via certified mail to the lead agency, the operator, and the department of the boards determination with instructions to the operator to submit to the lead agency for approval a revised financial assurance cost estimate consistent with the boards determination.
(C)The lead agency shall approve the revised financial assurance cost estimate. That approval shall supersede and void the prior approved financial assurance cost estimate.
(D)A financial assurance mechanism shall be established by the operator pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2773.4 following the approval of the financial assurance cost estimate.
(h)(1)Within 90 days of a surface mining operation becoming idle, as defined in Section 2727.1, the operator shall submit to the lead agency for review and approval an interim management plan. The review and approval of an interim management plan shall not be considered a project for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)). The approved interim management plan shall be considered an amendment to the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan for purposes of this chapter. The interim management plan shall provide measures the operator will implement to maintain the site in compliance with this chapter, including, but not limited to, all permit conditions.
(2)The interim management plan may remain in effect for a period not to exceed five years, at which time the lead agency shall do one of the following:
(A)Renew the interim management plan for an additional period not to exceed five years, which may be renewed for one additional five-year renewal period at the expiration of the first five-year renewal period, if the lead agency finds that the surface mining operator has complied fully with the interim management plan.
(B)Require the operator to commence reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan.
(3)The financial assurances required by Section 2773.1 shall remain in effect during the period that the surface mining operation is idle. If the surface mining operation is still idle after the expiration of its interim management plan, the operator shall commence reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan.
(4)Within 60 days of the receipt of the interim management plan or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the lead agency and the operator, the lead agency shall review and approve the plan in accordance with its ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774, so long as the plan satisfies the requirements of this subdivision, and so notify the operator in writing. Otherwise, the lead agency shall notify the operator in writing of any deficiencies in the plan. The operator shall have 30 days, or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the operator and the lead agency, to submit a revised plan.
(5)The lead agency shall approve or deny approval of the revised interim management plan within 60 days of receipt. If the lead agency denies approval of the revised interim management plan, the operator may appeal that action to the lead agencys governing body, which shall schedule a public hearing within 45 days of the filing of the appeal or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the operator and the governing body.
(6)Unless review of an interim management plan is pending before the lead agency or an appeal is pending before the lead agencys governing body, a surface mining operation that remains idle for over one year after becoming idle, as defined in Section 2727.1, without obtaining approval of an interim management plan shall be considered abandoned and the operator shall commence and complete reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan.
(i)An enforcement action that may be brought against a surface mining operation for operating without an approved reclamation plan, financial assurance, or interim management plan shall be held in abeyance pending review pursuant to subdivision (b), (d), (b) or (h), or the resolution of an appeal filed with the board pursuant to subdivision (e), or with a lead agency governing body pursuant to subdivision (h).
SEC. 6.SEC. 7.Section 2772 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2772.(a)The reclamation plan shall be filed with the lead agency, on a form provided by the lead agency, by any person who owns, leases, or otherwise controls or operates on all or any portion of any mined lands and who plans to conduct surface mining operations on the lands.
(b)The reclamation plan shall include a chart identifying the page number, chapter, appendix, or other specific location in the reclamation plan where content meeting the requirements, as applicable, of Sections 2772, 2773, and 2773.3 and Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) and Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, is located.
(c)The reclamation plan shall include all of the following information and documents:
(1)The name and address of the operator and the names and addresses of any persons designated by the operator as an agent for the service of process.
(2)The anticipated quantity and type of minerals for which the surface mining operation is to be conducted.
(3)The proposed dates for the initiation and completion termination of reclamation activities for the surface mining operation.
(4)The maximum anticipated depth of the surface mining operation.
(5)A reclamation plan map or maps that shall include all of the following:
(A)Size and legal description of the lands that will be affected by the surface mining operation and the names and addresses of the owners of all surface interests and mineral interests in the lands.
(B)Clearly defined and accurately drawn property lines, setbacks, and the reclamation plan boundary.
(C)Existing topography and final topography depicted with contour lines drawn at appropriate intervals for the sites conditions.
(D)Detailed geologic description of the area of the surface mining operation.
(E)Location of railroads, utility facilities, access roads, temporary roads to be reclaimed, and any roads remaining for the approved end use.
(F)All maps, diagrams, or calculations that require preparation in accordance with the Professional Engineers Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 6700) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code), the Geologist and Geophysicist Act (Chapter 12.5 (commencing with Section 7800) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code), or the Professional Land Surveyors Act (Chapter 15 (commencing with Section 8700) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) shall be prepared by a California-licensed professional, shall include his or her license number and name, and shall bear the signature and seal of the licensee.
(6)A description of and a plan for the type of surface mining to be employed and a time schedule that will provide for the completion of surface mining on each segment of the mined lands so that reclamation can be initiated at the earliest possible time on those portions of the mined lands that will not be subject to further disturbance by the surface mining operation.
(7)A description of the proposed use or potential uses of the mined lands after reclamation and evidence that all owners of a possessory interest in the land have been notified of the proposed use or potential uses.
(8)A description of the manner in which reclamation, adequate for the proposed use or potential uses, will be accomplished, including both of the following:
(A)A description of the manner in which known contaminants will be controlled and mining waste will be disposed.
(B)A description of the manner in which affected streambed channels and streambanks will be rehabilitated to a condition that minimizes erosion and sedimentation.
(9)An assessment of the effect of implementation of the reclamation plan on future mining in the area.
(10)A statement that the person submitting the reclamation plan accepts responsibility for reclaiming the mined lands in accordance with the reclamation plan.
(11)Any other information that the lead agency may require by ordinance.
(d)An item of information or a document required pursuant to subdivision (c) that has already been prepared as part of a permit application for the surface mining operation, or as part of an environmental document prepared for the project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) may be included in the reclamation plan by reference, if that item of information or that document is attached to the reclamation plan when the lead agency submits the reclamation plan to the director for review. To the extent the information, document, or component of a document referenced in the reclamation plan is used to meet the requirements of subdivision (c) or Section 2773 or 2773.3, the information, document, or component of a document shall become part of the reclamation plan and shall be subject to all other requirements of this article.
(e)Nothing in this section is intended to limit or expand the departments authority or responsibility to review a document in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
SEC. 7.SEC. 8.Section 2772.1 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2772.1.(a)(1)Prior to approving a surface mining operations reclamation plan or plan amendment, the lead agency shall submit the reclamation plan or plan amendment to the director for review. The reclamation plan or plan amendment shall be submitted to the director as early as practicable in order to facilitate the lead agencys review of the reclamation plan pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)). All documentation for the submission shall be submitted to the director at one time.
(2)An item of information, document, or component of a document that has been prepared as part of a permit application for the surface mining operation or as part of an environmental document prepared for the project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) shall be incorporated into the reclamation plan or plan amendment if it is used to satisfy the requirements of subdivision (c) of Section 2772 and 2772, Sections 2773 and 2773.3, if and Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) and Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, as applicable. If an item of information, document, or component of a document is incorporated, reference to the item shall be added to the chart required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2772 and shall be properly indexed with the corresponding appendix reference and page numbers, if applicable. The item shall be included in an appendix to and shall become part of the reclamation plan or plan amendment. A technical report created by a California-licensed professional to support variations to the reclamation standards adopted by the board pursuant to Section 2773 shall be included in an appendix to the reclamation plan or plan amendment bearing the California-licensed professionals stamp or seal, as applicable.
(3)The lead agency shall certify to the director that the reclamation plan or plan amendment is a complete submission and is in compliance with all of the following:
(A)The applicable requirements of this chapter.
(B)Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) and Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Regulations, as applicable.
(C)The lead agencys surface mining ordinance in effect at the time that the reclamation plan or plan amendment is submitted to the director for review review, except if the board is the lead agency.
(b)(1)The director shall have 15 30 days from the receipt of a reclamation plan or plan amendment to notify the lead agency and operator if the submission is incomplete. An incomplete submission is one that does not meet the content requirements of subdivision (a) of this section and subdivisions (c) and (d) of Section 2772. 2772, Sections 2773 and 2773.3, and Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) and Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, as applicable. The directors notice shall specifically identify all aspects of the submission that are incomplete. If the submission is incomplete due to the failure to include a professionally stamped copy of a technical report, map, or diagram that is required to be prepared by a California-licensed professional pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2772, the director shall request a stamped copy of the technical report, map, or diagram only, instead of a full resubmission of the reclamation plan or plan amendment. The review time required pursuant to paragraph (2) shall begin when the stamped copy of the technical report, map, or diagram is received by the director. The directors time to review the reclamation plan or plan amendment shall commence upon the receipt of a submission that contains the item or items identified in the directors notice to the lead agency.
(2)The director shall have 45 30 days from the receipt of a complete reclamation plan or plan amendment after the date the director is required to notify the lead agency if the submission is incomplete to prepare written comments on the reclamation plan or plan amendment if the director chooses. The
(3)If the director has issued a notice of incomplete submission pursuant to paragraph (1), the directors time to prepare written comments on the reclamation plan or plan amendment shall not commence until the director receives each item identified in the notice. The directors time shall include any remaining time pursuant to paragraph (1) and the time allowed pursuant to paragraph (2).
(4)The lead agency shall review and evaluate written comments received from the director relating to the reclamation plan or plan amendment within a reasonable amount of time.
(3)
(5)(A)The lead agency shall prepare a written response to the directors comments received pursuant to paragraph (2) describing the disposition of the major issues raised by the comments. The lead agency shall submit its response to the director at least 30 days prior to the intended approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment. The lead agencys response shall include either of the following:
(i)A description of how the lead agency proposes to adopt the directors comments to the reclamation plan or plan amendment.
(ii)A detailed description of the reasons why the lead agency proposes not to adopt the directors comments.
(B)Copies of any written comments received and responses prepared by the lead agency pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be forwarded to the operator.
(4)
(6)(A)The lead agency shall give the director at least 30 days notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing at which the reclamation plan or plan amendment is scheduled to be approved by the lead agency.
(B)If no hearing is required by this chapter, the local ordinance, or other state law, the lead agency shall provide 30 days notice to the director that the lead agency intends to approve the reclamation plan or plan amendment.
(5)(A)Within 60 days following approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment, the lead agency shall provide the director its final response to the directors written comments and the final approved copies of those documents. During that time, the department retains all of its powers, duties, and authorities pursuant to this chapter.
(B)The lead agencys final response shall include an index showing permit conditions of approval and binding mitigation measures adopted or certified pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) that are necessary to meet the requirements of subdivision (c) of Section 2772 and Sections 2773 and 2773.3. Those conditions of approval and mitigation measures shall be included in an appendix to the reclamation plan or plan amendment and shall be considered part of the reclamation compliance requirements and subject to the annual inspection requirements. To the extent those conditions of approval and mitigation measures are not subject to separate lead agency or other state or federal agency bonding or performance requirements, those conditions and measures shall be subject to the financial assurances requirements of this article.
(6)No later than 60 days after the approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment, the lead agency shall provide an official copy of the approved reclamation plan or plan amendment incorporating all approved modifications to the reclamation plan or plan amendment to the director.
(7)(A)Within 30 days following the approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment, the lead agency shall provide the director notice of the approval. During that period, the department retains all powers, duties, and authorities of this chapter. The lead agency shall provide, as soon as practicable but no later than 60 days after approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment, certified copies of all maps, diagrams, or calculations, signed and sealed.
(B)No later than 60 days after the approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment, the lead agency shall provide to the director an official copy of the approved reclamation plan or plan amendment. The official copy shall incorporate all approved modifications to the reclamation plan or plan amendment and shall include an index showing any permit conditions of approval or binding mitigation measures adopted or certified pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) that are necessary to meet the requirements of subdivision (c) of Section 2772, Sections 2773 and 2773.3, and Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) and Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, as applicable. Those conditions of approval and mitigation measures shall be included in an appendix to the reclamation plan or plan amendment and shall be considered part of the reclamation compliance requirements and subject to the annual inspection requirements.
(c)To the extent there is a conflict between the comments of a trustee agency or a responsible agency that are based on that agencys statutory or regulatory authority and the comments of other commenting agencies that are received by the lead agency pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) regarding a reclamation plan or plan amendments, the lead agency shall consider only the comments of the trustee agency or responsible agency.
(d)Nothing in this section is intended to limit or expand the departments authority or responsibility to review a document in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
SEC. 8.SEC. 9.Section 2773.1 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2773.1.(a)Lead agencies shall require financial assurances of each surface mining operation to ensure reclamation is performed in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan, as follows:
(1)A financial assurance mechanism may take the form of surety bonds executed by an admitted surety insurer, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 995.120 of the Code of Civil Procedure, irrevocable letters of credit, trust funds, or other forms of financial assurances specified by the board pursuant to subdivision (e) that the lead agency reasonably determines are adequate to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan.
(2)The financial assurances shall remain in effect for the duration of the surface mining operation and any additional period until reclamation is completed.
(3)The amount of financial assurances required of a surface mining operation for any one year shall be reviewed and, if necessary, adjusted once each calendar year to account for new lands disturbed by surface mining operations, inflation, and reclamation of lands accomplished in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. An operator shall be required to replace an approved financial assurance mechanism to bond for the reclamation of the surface mining operation only if the financial assurance cost estimate identifies a need to increase the amount of the financial assurance mechanism.
(4)Financial assurance cost estimates shall be submitted to the lead agency for review on the form adopted by the board by regulation pursuant to subdivision (f). The estimates shall include estimates of the time needed to complete reclamation of the mine in accordance with the approved reclamation plan, including, but not limited to, any monitoring studies required by the reclamation plan.
(5)
(4)Each financial assurance mechanism shall be made payable to the lead agency and the department. A financial assurance mechanism shall not be released without the consent of the lead agency and the department. A financial assurance mechanism that was approved by the lead agency prior to January 1, 1993, and was made payable to the State Geologist shall be considered payable to the department for purposes of this chapter. However, if a surface mining operation has received approval of its financial assurances from a public agency other than the lead agency, the lead agency shall deem those financial assurances adequate for purposes of this section, or shall credit them toward fulfillment of the financial assurances required by this section, if they are made payable to the public agency, the lead agency, and the department and otherwise meet the requirements of this section. In any event, if a lead agency and one or more public agencies exercise jurisdiction over a surface mining operation, the total amount of financial assurances required by the lead agency and the public agencies for any one year shall not exceed that amount that is necessary to perform reclamation of lands remaining disturbed. For purposes of this paragraph, a public agency may include a federal agency.
(b)(1)If the lead agency, or the board when acting as a lead agency, has evidence that an operator may be financially incapable of completing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan or that the operator may have abandoned the surface mining operation without completing reclamation, the lead agency or board the board, when acting as a lead agency, shall conduct a public hearing to determine whether the operator is financially capable of completing reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan or has abandoned the surface mining operation. The hearing shall be noticed to the operator and the director at least 30 days prior to the hearing.
(2)If the lead agency or the board, following the public hearing conducted pursuant to paragraph (1), determines that the operator is financially incapable of performing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan or has abandoned its surface mining operation without completing reclamation, either the lead agency or the director shall do all of the following:
(A)Notify the operator by personal service or certified mail that the lead agency or the director intends to take appropriate action to forfeit the financial assurances and specify the reasons for so doing.
(B)Proceed to take appropriate action to require forfeiture of the financial assurances.
(C)Use the proceeds from the forfeited financial assurances to conduct and complete reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. If the surface mining operation cannot be reclaimed in accordance with its approved reclamation plan, or the financial assurances are inadequate to reclaim in accordance with its approved reclamation plan, the lead agency or director may use forfeited financial assurances to reclaim or remediate mining disturbances as appropriate for the site conditions as determined by both the lead agency and the director. The financial assurances shall not be used for any other purpose. The operator is responsible for the costs of conducting and completing reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan or a remediation plan developed pursuant to this section as determined appropriate by both the lead agency and the director that are in excess of the proceeds from the forfeited financial assurances.
(c)Financial assurances shall no longer be required of a surface mining operation, and shall be released, upon the written concurrence of the lead agency and the director, which shall be forwarded to the operator and the institutions providing or holding the financial assurance mechanism, that reclamation has been completed in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. If a surface mining operation is sold or ownership is transferred to another person, the existing financial assurances shall remain in force and shall not be released by the lead agency and the director until new financial assurances are secured from the new owner and have been approved by the lead agency in accordance with Sections 2770, 2773.1, and 2773.4. Within 90 days of the sale or transfer of the a surface mining operation, the new operator shall establish or maintain submit an appropriate financial assurance mechanism and mechanism, which may be the existing mechanism if the existing mechanism is payable in the event of the new operators default, that is subject to review by the lead agency and the director pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2773.4. Within 15 days of the sale or transfer of a surface mining operation, the new operator shall sign a new statement of reclamation responsibility in accordance with paragraph (10) of subdivision (c) of Section 2772.
(d)The lead agency shall have primary responsibility to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and to reclaim mine sites pursuant to subdivision (b). However, if the board is not the lead agency pursuant to Section 2774.4, the director may act to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and reclaim mine sites pursuant to subdivision (b) only if both of the following occurs:
(1)The financial incapability of the operator or the abandonment of the surface mining operation has come to the attention of the director.
(2)The lead agency has been notified in writing by the director of the financial incapability of the operator or the abandonment of the surface mining operation for at least 15 days, the lead agency has not taken appropriate measures to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances and reclaim the mine site, and one of the following has occurred:
(A)The lead agency has been notified in writing by the director that failure to take appropriate measures to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances or to reclaim the mine site shall result in actions being taken against the lead agency under Section 2774.4.
(B)The director determines that there is a violation that amounts to an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health, safety, or to the environment.
(C)The lead agency notifies the director in writing that its good faith attempts to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances have not been successful.
The director shall comply with subdivision (b) in seeking forfeiture of financial assurances and reclaiming mine sites.
(e)The board may adopt regulations specifying financial assurance mechanisms other than surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, and trust funds, which the board determines are reasonably available and adequate to ensure reclamation pursuant to this chapter, but these mechanisms shall not include financial tests or surety bonds executed by one or more personal sureties. These mechanisms may include reclamation bond pool programs.
(f)The board shall adopt or revise guidelines to implement this section as necessary. The guidelines are exempt from the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code), and are not subject to review by the Office of Administrative Law.
SEC. 9.SEC. 10.Section 2773.4 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2773.4.(a)(1)Prior to approving the financial assurances for a new reclamation plan or adjustments to financial assurances based on an amendment to a reclamation plan, the lead agency shall submit the financial assurance cost estimate to the director for review.
(2)The lead agency shall provide the director with a preliminary determination of whether that the financial assurance cost estimate submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) is adequate, complete, and consistent with Section 2773.1. 2773.1, Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and the boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1.
(3)All documentation submitted to the director pursuant to this subdivision shall be submitted at one time.
(b)No later than ___ 15 days after receiving a financial assurance cost estimate, the director shall notify the lead agency and the operator if the submission is incomplete. An incomplete submission is one that does not meet the content requirements of Section 2773.1. 2773.1, Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and the boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1. The directors notice shall specifically identify all aspects of the submission that are incomplete. The directors time to review the financial assurance cost estimate shall commence upon the receipt of a submission that contains the aspects identified in the directors notice to the lead agency.
(c)(1)The director shall have ___ 45 days from the date of receipt of a complete financial assurance cost estimate to prepare written comments if the director chooses.
(2)The lead agency shall evaluate written comments received from the director relating to the financial assurances assurance cost estimate within a reasonable amount of time. The lead agency shall prepare a written response to the directors comments describing the disposition of the major issues raised by the directors comments.
(3)The lead agency shall submit its proposed response to the director at least ___ 30 days prior to approval of the financial assurance cost estimate. The lead agencys response shall include either of the following:
(A)A description of how the lead agency proposes to adopt the directors comments to the financial assurance cost estimate.
(B)A detailed description of the reasons why the lead agency proposes to reject not adopt the directors comments.
(4)Copies of any written comments received and responses prepared by the lead agency shall be forwarded to the operator.
(5)(A)If the lead agency, in its written response to the directors comments, proposes to not adopt the directors comments relating to the financial assurance cost estimate, the director, within 15 days of receipt of the lead agencys written response, may request in writing a consultation with the lead agency to discuss the directors comments and the lead agencys response. The request shall include an invitation to the operator to participate in the consultation. The consultation may be conducted in person, electronically, telephonically, or by any means convenient to the parties.
(B)If the director requests a consultation pursuant to this subdivision, the lead agency shall not approve the financial assurance cost estimate until after consulting with the director. The consultation shall occur not later than 30 days after the directors request unless an alternate timeframe is mutually agreed upon by the director, lead agency, and operator.
(5)
(6)(A)The lead agency shall give the director at least ___ 30 days notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing at which the financial assurance cost estimate is scheduled to be approved by the lead agency. If no hearing is required by this chapter, local ordinance, or other state law, then the lead agency shall provide ___ 30 days notice to the director that it intends to approve the financial assurance cost estimate.
(B)The lead agency shall send to the director its final response to the directors comments within ___ 30 days following its approval of the financial assurance cost estimate, during which time the department retains all of its powers, duties, and authority pursuant to this chapter.
(d)(1)(A)Within ___ 30 days of an annual inspection being conducted pursuant to Section 2774, an operator shall provide an annual financial assurance cost estimate to the lead agency for review.
(B)If the lead agency fails to cause the inspection of the surface mining operation on the date requested by the operator pursuant to Section 2207 or on an alternate date set by the lead agency pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774, the operator shall provide an annual financial assurance cost estimate to the lead agency for review within 30 days of the missed inspection date, unless the lead agency causes the inspection to occur within that time period, in which case the operator shall provide an annual financial assurance cost estimate to the lead agency within 30 days of the date of the inspection.
(2)(A)Within ___ 60 days of receiving an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate, the lead agency shall do both of one of the following:
(A)Review the annual financial assurance cost estimate for adequacy and completeness consistent with Section 2773.1.
(B)Submit the annual financial assurance cost estimate to the director for review.
(i)Deny the financial assurance cost estimate pursuant to paragraph (6).
(ii)Submit the financial assurance cost estimate to the director for review.
(B)The lead agency shall provide the director with a determination that the annual financial assurance cost estimate submitted is adequate, complete, and consistent with Section 2773.1, Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and the boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1.
(3)All documentation submitted to the director pursuant to this subdivision shall be submitted at one time.
(4)The lead agency shall provide the director with a preliminary determination of whether the annual financial assurance cost estimate submitted pursuant to this subdivision is adequate, complete, and consistent with Section 2773.1.
(5)
(4)Within ___ 15 days of receiving an annual financial assurance cost estimate, the director shall notify the lead agency and the operator if the submission is incomplete. An incomplete submission is one that does not meet the content requirements of Section 2773.1. 2773.1, Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and the boards financial assurance guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1. The directors notice shall specifically identify all aspects of the submission that are incomplete. The directors time to review the annual financial assurance cost estimate shall commence upon the receipt of a submission that contains the aspects identified in the directors notice to the lead agency.
(6)
(5)(A)Within ___ 45 days of receiving an operators complete annual financial assurance cost estimate from the lead agency, the director shall prepare written comments on the operators annual financial assurances assurance cost estimate and provide the comments to the lead agency and the operator if the director so chooses.
(B)(i)Within ___ 30 days from receiving the directors written comments pursuant to this subdivision, the lead agency shall evaluate the written comments and provide the director and operator its proposed response to the director.
(ii)The lead agency shall submit its proposed response to the director at least 30 days prior to approving the annual financial assurance cost estimate. The lead agencys response shall include either of the following:
(I)A description of how the lead agency proposes to adopt the directors comments to the annual financial assurance cost estimate.
(II)A detailed description of the reasons why the lead agency proposes not to adopt the directors comments.
(iii)Copies of any written comments received and responses prepared by the lead agency pursuant to this subparagraph shall be provided to the operator.
(C)(i)If the lead agency, in its written response to the directors comments, proposes to not adopt the directors comments concerning the annual financial assurance cost estimate, the director, within 15 days of receipt of the lead agencys written response, may request in writing a consultation with the lead agency to discuss the directors comments and the lead agencys response. The request shall include an invitation to the operator to participate in the consultation. The consultation may be conducted in person, electronically, telephonically, or by any means convenient to the parties.
(ii)If the director requests a consultation pursuant to this subparagraph, the lead agency shall not approve the annual financial assurance cost estimate until after consulting with the director. The consultation shall occur not later than 30 days after the directors request unless an alternate timeframe is mutually agreed upon by the director, lead agency, and operator.
(C)
(D)(i)Within ___ 60 days of receiving the directors written comments, or of a consultation pursuant to this subdivision, whichever is later or the due date of the directors written comments if they are not none are received, the lead agency shall accept or reject approve or deny an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate. In approving a financial assurance cost estimate, the lead agency, with the concurrence of the operator, may modify the financial assurance cost estimate as necessary to correct deficiencies identified by the director or lead agency.
(ii)The lead agency shall give the director at least 30 days notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing at which the annual financial assurance cost estimate is scheduled to be approved by the lead agency.
(iii)If no hearing is required by this chapter, local ordinance, or other state law, the lead agency shall provide 30 days notice to the director that it intends to approve the annual financial assurance cost estimate.
(D)
(E)Within ___ 30 days of the lead agencys acceptance approval of the annual financial assurance cost estimate, the lead agency shall send the director its final response to the directors comments.
(7)
(6)If the lead agency determines an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate is inadequate, the lead agency shall specify the reasons for that determination. The operator shall have ___ 30 days to appeal that denial pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2770 or provide a revised financial assurance cost estimate incorporating the suggested changes to the director and the lead agency for approval by the lead agency pursuant to this section.
(e)(1)Within ___ 30 days of the lead agencys approval of a financial assurance cost estimate pursuant to this section, the operator shall provide the lead agency and the director an appropriate financial assurance mechanism. The operator shall provide this financial assurance mechanism even if the director has appealed the approval pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2770.
(2)(A)Within ___ 15 days of receiving a financial assurance mechanism pursuant to this subdivision, or subdivision (c) of Section 2773.1 the lead agency and the director shall review the financial assurance mechanism to determine if the type of mechanism, including the release instructions, meets the requirements of this chapter.
(3)A financial assurance mechanism utilizing any of the forms provided as Appendix D, Appendix E-1, Appendix E-2, Appendix E-3, and Appendix F to the guidelines adopted by the board pursuant to subdivision (f) of section 2773.1 shall be deemed to meet the requirements of this chapter. A financial assurance mechanism considered by the lead agency or the director to not meet the requirements of this chapter shall be returned to the operator with correction instructions as to the type and release language of the financial assurance mechanism.
(B)Financial assurance mechanisms determined to be noncompliant with this chapter shall be returned to the operator with instructions on how to correct the type or release instructions of the financial assurance mechanism.
(3)By July 1, 2017, the board shall adopt forms to implement this subdivision as necessary. The forms shall be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code).
(f)The review and approval of financial assurances pursuant to this chapter shall not be considered a project for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
SEC. 10.SEC. 11.Section 2774 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.(a)Every lead agency shall adopt ordinances in accordance with state policy that establish procedures for the review and approval of reclamation plans and financial assurances and the issuance of a permit to conduct surface mining operations, except that any lead agency without an active surface mining operation in its jurisdiction may defer adopting an implementing ordinance until the filing of a permit application. The ordinances shall establish procedures requiring at least one public hearing and shall be periodically reviewed by the lead agency and revised, as necessary, to ensure that the ordinances continue to be in accordance with state policy.
(b)Surface (1)The lead agency shall cause surface mining operations shall to be inspected annually, in intervals of no more than 12 months, solely to determine whether the surface mining operation is in compliance with this chapter. The lead agency shall cause an inspection to be conducted by a state-licensed geologist, state-licensed civil engineer, state-licensed landscape architect, state-licensed forester, or a lead agency employee who is qualified and experienced in land reclamation and who has not been employed by the surface mining operation being inspected in any capacity during the previous 12 months, except that a qualified lead agency employee may inspect surface mining operations conducted by another department within the local agency. All inspections shall be conducted using a form developed by the department and approved by the board that includes the professional licensing and disciplinary information of the person who conducted the inspection. The operator shall be solely responsible for the reasonable cost of the inspection. The lead agency shall provide a notice of completion of inspection to the director within 90 days of conducting the inspection. The notice shall contain a statement regarding the surface mining operations compliance with its approved reclamation plan, as described in this chapter, chapter and a copy of the completed inspection form, and which aspects of the surface mining operations, if any, are inconsistent with its approved reclamation plan, as described in this chapter, and any corrective measures recommended by the inspector. If shall specify, as applicable, all of the following:
(A)Aspects of the surface mining operation, if any, that were found to be inconsistent with this chapter but were corrected before the submission of the inspection form to the director.
(B)Aspects of the surface mining operation, if any, that were found to be inconsistent with this chapter but were not corrected before the submission of the inspection form to the director.
(C)A statement describing the lead agencys intended response to any aspects of the surface mining operation found to be inconsistent with this chapter but were not corrected before the submission of the inspection form to the director.
(2)If the surface mining operation has a review of its reclamation plan, financial assurances, or an interim management plan pending under subdivision (b), (c), (d), (b) or (h) of Section 2770, or an appeal pending before the board or lead agency governing body under subdivision (e) or (h) of Section 2770, the notice shall so indicate. The lead agency shall forward to the operator a copy of the notice, a copy of the completed inspection form, and any supporting documentation, including, but not limited to, any inspection report prepared by the geologist, civil engineer, landscape architect, forester, or qualified lead agency employee who conducted the inspection.
(c)If an operator does not request an inspection date on the annual report filed pursuant to Section 2207 or if the lead agency is unable to cause the inspection of a given surface mining operation on the date requested by the operator, the lead agency shall provide the operator with a minimum of five days written notice of a pending inspection or a lesser time period if agreed to by the operator.
(d)(1)No later than April July 1 of each year, the lead agency shall submit to the director shall provide each lead agency with a notice listing for each active or idle surface mining operation within the lead agencys jurisdiction. For each surface mining operation, the director shall request and the lead agency shall provide to the director, on a form provided by the director, no later than July 1 of each year the following information:
(A)
(1)A copy of any permit or reclamation plan amendments, as applicable.
(B)
(2)A statement that there have been no changes during the previous year, as applicable.
(C)
(3)The date of each surface mining operations last inspection.
(D)
(4)The date of each surface mining operations last financial assurance review pursuant to Section 2773.1 for each operation listed.
(2)The director shall request similar information on any new or omitted operations, to be provided to the director no later than July 1 of each year.
(e)(1)After January 1, 2018, a lead agency employee who is not a state-licensed geologist, state-licensed civil engineer, state-licensed landscape architect, or a state-licensed forester and who inspects surface mining operations under this chapter shall have completed an inspection workshop or an update workshop provided by the director. The director shall provide an adequate transition time period for lead agency inspectors to complete the update workshop if it becomes necessary.
(2)Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to affect or impose qualifications or standards on employees designated by a local, state, or federal agency to perform inspections of real property under separate provisions of local, state, or federal law, including, but not limited to, the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code), the federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.), and the Fish and Game Code, notwithstanding the fact that that informational addenda are submitted to lead agencies pursuant to this chapter in addition to reclamation plans, including materials submitted pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 2772.
(e)(1)No later than December 31, 2016, the department shall establish a training program for all surface mine inspectors. The program shall be designed to include a guidance document, developed by the department, in consultation with the board and stakeholders, to provide instruction and recommendations to surface mine inspectors performing inspections pursuant to subdivision (b).
(2)The training program shall include inspections workshops offered by the department in different regions of the state to provide practical application of the guidance document material.
(3)On and after July 1, 2019, all inspectors shall have on file with the lead agency and the department a certificate of completion of an inspection workshop. An inspector shall attend a workshop no later than five years after the date of his or her most recent certificate.
(4)The adoption of the guidance document by the department pursuant to this subdivision shall be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code).
SEC. 12.Section 2774.1 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.1.(a)(1)Except as provided in subdivision (i) of Section 2770, if the lead agency or the director determines, based upon an annual inspection pursuant to Section 2774, or otherwise confirmed by an inspection of the surface mining operation, that a surface mining operation is not in compliance with this chapter, the lead agency or the director may notify issue a notice of that violation to the operator of that violation by personal service or certified mail. If the violation extends beyond 30 days after the date of the lead agencys or the directors notification, If the lead agency issues the notice, the lead agency shall send a copy of the notice to the director. The notice shall include both of the following:
(A)A description of the violation.
(B)Actions the operator shall take to correct the violation.
(2)(A)If a lead agency or the director determines that the time to correct the noticed violation will exceed 30 days, the lead agency and the operator may enter into a stipulated order to comply, with notice sent to the director. If the director initiated the enforcement action, the director, after consulting with the lead agency, may enter into a stipulated order to comply with the operator. The lead agency may, but need not, join the stipulated order with the director.
(B)A stipulated order to comply shall include a schedule and time for compliance that the lead agency or the director, as applicable, determines is reasonable after taking into account the actions and legal processes required to correct the violation.
(3)(A)If the operator does not comply with a notice issued pursuant to paragraph (1) within 30 days of being served the notice or commit to enter into a stipulated order to comply pursuant to paragraph (2) within 30 days of being served the notice, the lead agency or the director may issue an order to comply by personal service or certified mail requiring the operator to comply with this chapter or, if the operator does not have an approved reclamation plan or financial assurances, cease all further surface mining activities.
(b)
(B)An order to comply issued under subdivision (a) pursuant to this paragraph shall not take effect until the operator has been provided 30 days following the service of the order to comply unless within those 30 days the operator appeals the order to comply and requests a hearing before the lead agency for orders issued by the lead agency, or, board for orders issued by the director or the board, depending on who issued the order to comply concerning the alleged violation. An order to comply issued under subdivision (a) pursuant to this paragraph shall specify which aspects of the surface mines activities or operations are inconsistent with this chapter, shall specify a time for compliance that the lead agency or director determines is reasonable, taking into account the seriousness of the violation and any good faith efforts to comply with applicable requirements, and shall set a date for the hearing, which shall not be sooner than 30 days after the date of the order. all of the following:
(i)Which aspects of the surface mining operation are inconsistent with this chapter.
(ii)A time for compliance that the lead agency or director determines is reasonable, taking into account the seriousness of the alleged violation and any good faith efforts to comply with applicable requirements.
(iii)The actions and legal processes required to correct the alleged violation.
(C)An appeal filed pursuant to subparagraph (B) shall be noticed and heard at a public hearing within 45 days of the filing of the appeal or a longer period as may be mutually agreed upon by the operator and the lead agency or the operator and the director, depending on who issued the order to comply.
(b)[Reserved]
(c)An operator who violates or fails to comply with an order to comply issued under subdivision (a) after the orders effective date, as provided in subdivision (b), date or who fails to submit a report or pay annual fees to the director or lead agency as required by Section 2207, shall be subject to an order by the lead agency or the director imposing an administrative penalty of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) per day, assessed from the original date of noncompliance with this chapter or chapter, including Section 2207. 2207, or from the date of the inspection when the violation was identified, at the discretion of the issuer of the notice of that violation. The penalty may be imposed administratively by the lead agency or the director. In determining the amount of the administrative penalty, the lead agency or the director shall take into consideration the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation or violations, any prior history of violations, the degree of culpability, economic savings, if any, resulting from the violation, and any other matters justice may require. Orders setting administrative penalties shall become effective upon issuance of the order assessment and payment shall be made to the lead agency or the director within 30 days, unless the operator petitions the legislative body of the lead agency, the board, or the superior court for review as provided in Section 2774.2. An order shall be served by personal service or by certified mail upon the operator. Penalties collected by the director shall not be used for purposes other than to cover the reasonable costs incurred by the director in implementing this chapter or Section 2207.
(d)(1)An operator who violates or fails to comply with an order to comply issued pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) or a stipulated order to comply entered into pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) after the orders effective date shall be removed from the list published by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2717.
(2)If after a public hearing the board or lead agency denies an appeal by the operator pursuant to subdivision (b), the operator shall be removed 10 working days following the denial of the appeal from the list published by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2717.
(3)If the operator enters into a stipulated order to comply between the operator and the lead agency or the operator and the director within 10 working days of the denial of the appeal and the stipulated order to comply is consistent with the order to comply upheld by the board or lead agency and includes a stipulated schedule for compliance, the operator shall remain on the list published by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2717.
(4)Issuance of a notice pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) or an order to comply or stipulated order to comply pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (a) shall not disqualify an operator from eligibility for placement on the list published by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2717.
(d)
(e)If the lead agency or the director determines that the surface mine is not in compliance with this chapter, so that the surface mine presents an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or the environment, the lead agency or the Attorney General, on behalf of the director, may seek an order from a court of competent jurisdiction enjoining that operation.
(e)
(f)Upon a complaint by the director, the department, or the board, the Attorney General may bring an action to recover administrative penalties under this section, and penalties under Section 2207, in any court of competent jurisdiction in this state against any person violating any provision of this chapter or Section 2207, or any regulation adopted pursuant to this chapter or Section 2207. The Attorney General may bring this action on his or her own initiative if, after examining the complaint and the evidence, he or she believes a violation has occurred. The Attorney General may also seek an order from a court of competent jurisdiction compelling the operator to comply with this chapter and Section 2207.
(f)
(g)(1)The lead agency has primary responsibility for enforcing this chapter and Section 2207. In cases where the board is not the lead agency pursuant to Section 2774.4, enforcement actions may be initiated by the director pursuant to this section only after the violation has come to the attention of the director and either of the following occurs:
(A)The lead agency has been notified by the director in writing of the violation for at least 30 days, and has not taken appropriate enforcement action, which may include failing to issue an order to comply within a reasonable time after issuing a notice of violation.
(B)The director determines that there is a violation that amounts to an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or safety, or to the environment.
(2)The director shall comply with this section in initiating enforcement actions.
(g)
(h)Remedies under this section are in addition to, and do not supersede or limit, any and all other remedies, civil or criminal.
SEC. 11.SEC. 13.Section 2774.2 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.2.(a)Within 30 days of the issuance of an order setting administrative penalties under subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1, the operator may petition the legislative body of the lead agency, if the lead agency has issued the order, or the board for orders issued by the director, for review of the order. If the operator does not petition for review within the time limits set by this subdivision, the order setting administrative penalties shall not be subject to review by any court or agency.
(b)The legislative body of the lead agency or the board shall notify the operator by personal service or certified mail whether it will review the order setting administrative penalties. In reviewing an order pursuant to this section, the record shall consist of the record before the lead agency or the director and any other relevant evidence which, in the judgment of the legislative body or the board, should be considered to effectuate and implement the policies of this chapter.
(c)The legislative body or the board may affirm, modify, or set aside, in whole or in part, by its own order an order of the lead agency or the director setting administrative penalties reviewed by the legislative body or the board pursuant to this section.
(d)An order of the legislative body or the board issued under subdivision (c) shall become effective upon its issuance unless the operator petitions the superior court for review as provided in subdivision (e). An order shall be served by personal service or by certified mail upon the operator. Payment of an administrative penalty that is specified in an order issued pursuant to subdivision (c) shall be made to the lead agency or the director within 30 days of service of the order. However, the payment shall be held in an interest bearing impound account pending the resolution of a petition for review filed pursuant to subdivision (e).
(e)An operator aggrieved by an order of the legislative body or the board issued pursuant to subdivision (c) may obtain review of the order by filing in the superior court a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days following the issuance of the order. An operator aggrieved by an order of a lead agency or the director setting administrative penalties pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1, for which the legislative body or board denies review, may obtain review of the order in the superior court by filing in the court a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days following the denial of review. The provisions of Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall govern judicial proceedings pursuant to this subdivision, except that in every case the court shall exercise its independent judgment. If the operator does not petition for a writ of mandate within the time limits set by this subdivision, an order of the board or the legislative body shall not be subject to review by any court or agency.
(f)(1)After the expiration of the time to petition for review pursuant to subdivision (a) or (e), the director or the board acting as the lead agency may apply to the small claims court or the superior court, depending on the jurisdictional amount, in the county where the administrative penalty was imposed for a judgment to collect the unpaid administrative penalty imposed pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1. The application shall include all of the following:
(A)The order setting the administrative penalty pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1.
(B)A notice to the operator of the right to petition for review of the order.
(C)Either of the following:
(i)A declaration from the board that no petition was made or that the board declined to review the petition.
(ii)A copy of the final order of the board.
(2)An application submitted pursuant to this subdivision shall constitute a sufficient showing to warrant the issuance of the judgment. The court clerk shall enter the judgment immediately in conformity with the application.
(3)The judgment entered pursuant to this subdivision shall have the same force and effect as, and shall be subject to all the provisions of law relating to, a judgment in a civil action and may be enforced in the same manner as any other judgment of the court. The court shall make enforcement of the judgment a priority.
SEC. 14.Section 2774.4 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.4.(a)If the board finds that a lead agency either has (1) approved reclamation plans or financial assurances which are not consistent with this chapter, (2) failed to inspect or cause the inspection of surface mining operations as required by this chapter, (3) failed to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and to carry out reclamation of surface mining operations as required by this chapter, (4) failed to take appropriate enforcement actions as required by this chapter, (5) intentionally misrepresented the results of inspections required under this chapter, or (6) failed to submit information to the department as required by this chapter, the board shall exercise any of the powers of that lead agency under this chapter, except for permitting authority.
2774.4.(a)The board shall exercise some or all of a lead agencys powers under this chapter pursuant to subdivision (c), except for permitting authority and vested rights determinations, if the board finds that a lead agency has done any of the following:
(1)Approved reclamation plans or financial assurances that are not consistent with this chapter.
(2)Failed to inspect or cause the inspection of surface mining operations as required by this chapter.
(3)Failed to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and to carry out reclamation of surface mining operations as required by this chapter.
(4)Failed to take appropriate enforcement actions as required by this chapter.
(5)Intentionally misrepresented the results of inspections required under this chapter.
(6)Failed to submit information to the department as required by this chapter.
(b)If, The board shall conduct a public hearing no sooner than three years after the board has taken action pursuant to subdivision (a), the board finds, after a public hearing, that (a) to determine if a lead agency has corrected its deficiencies in implementing and enforcing this chapter, chapter and the rules and regulations adopted pursuant to this chapter, chapter. If the board finds the lead agency has corrected some or all of its deficiencies in implementing and enforcing this chapter, the board shall restore to the lead agency some or all of the powers assumed by the board pursuant to subdivision (a).
(c)Before taking any action pursuant to subdivision (a), the board shall first notify the lead agency of the identified deficiencies, and allow the lead agency 45 days to correct the deficiencies to the satisfaction of the board. If the lead agency has not corrected the deficiencies to the satisfaction of the board within the 45-day period, the board shall hold a public hearing within the lead agencys area of jurisdiction, upon a 45-day written notice given to the public in at least one newspaper of general circulation within the city or county, and directly mailed to the lead agency and to all surface mining operators within the lead agencys jurisdiction who have submitted reports as required by Section 2207.
(c)(1)Before taking any action pursuant to subdivision (a), the board shall first notify the lead agency of the identified deficiencies and allow the lead agency 45 days to provide a response to the board on the identified deficiencies. The board may review the lead agencys response at a regularly scheduled meeting.
(2)(A)If the board is not satisfied with the lead agencys response, the board shall hold a public hearing within the lead agencys area of jurisdiction, upon a 45-day written notice given to the public in at least one newspaper of general circulation within the city or county and directly mailed to the lead agency and to all operators within the lead agencys jurisdiction who have submitted reports as required by Section 2207.
(B)At the hearing, the board shall determine if the lead agency has engaged in the conduct described in subdivision (a). If the board finds that the lead agency has engaged in conduct described in subdivision (a), the board shall do either of the following:
(i)Require the lead agency to develop a remedial plan to correct the noted deficiencies. The remedial plan shall describe specific objectives and corresponding processes designed to address, at a minimum, the noted deficiencies and a time that the remedial plan will be fully implemented. The board shall set a hearing to review the completion of the remedial plan consistent with paragraph (2) and subdivisions (d) and (e).
(ii)Take immediate action pursuant to subdivision (a).
(d)Affected surface mining operators and interested persons have the right, right at the public hearing, hearing to present oral and written evidence on the matter being considered. The At the public hearing, the board may, at the public hearing, place reasonable limits on the right of affected surface mining operators and interested persons to question and solicit testimony.
(e)If, after conducting the public hearing required by subdivision (c), (1)If the board decides to take action pursuant to subdivision (a), (a) and exercise some or all of a lead agencys powers under this chapter, except for permitting authority and vested rights determinations, the board shall, based on the record of the public hearing, board, based on the record of the public hearing, shall adopt written findings which that explain all of the following:
(1)
(A)The action to be taken by the board.
(2)
(B)Why the board decided to take the action.
(3)
(C)Why the action is authorized by, by and meets the requirements of, of subdivision (a).
(2)In addition, the boards findings shall address the significant issues raised, or written evidence presented, by affected surface mining operators, interested persons, or the lead agency. agency, or the department. The transcript of testimony and exhibits, together with all papers and requests filed in the proceedings, shall constitute the exclusive record for decision by the board.
(f)If the board finds at the hearing held pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) that the lead agency has not completed the remedial plan prepared pursuant to clause (i) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) to the boards satisfaction, the board shall follow the procedures set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) and subdivisions (d) and (e). If the board finds at the hearing held pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) that the lead agency has completed the remedial plan prepared pursuant to clause (i) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) to the boards satisfaction, the board shall conclude the action it has taken pursuant to this section.
(f)
(g)The lead agency, any affected surface mining operator, or any interested person who has presented oral or written evidence at the public hearing before the board pursuant to subdivision (d) may obtain review of the boards action taken pursuant to subdivision (a) by filing in the superior court a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days following the issuance of the boards decision. Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure governs judicial proceedings pursuant to this subdivision, except that in every case the court shall exercise its independent judgment. If a petition for a writ of mandate is not filed within the time limits set by this subdivision, the boards action under subdivision (a) shall not be subject to review by any court or agency.
SEC. 12.SEC. 15.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
SEC. 16.This act shall become operative only if both this bill and Senate Bill 209 of the 201516 Regular Session are enacted and become operative.
(a)The owner or the operator of a mining operation within the state shall forward to the director annually, not later than a date established by the director, upon forms approved by the board from time to time, a report that identifies and contains all of the following:
(1)The name, address, and telephone number of the person, company, or other owner of the mining operation.
(2)The name, address, and telephone number of a designated agent who resides in this state, and who will receive and accept service of all orders, notices, and processes of the lead agency, board, director, or court.
(3)The location of the mining operation, its name, its mine number as issued by the Office of Mine Reclamation or the director, its section, township, range, latitude, longitude, and approximate boundaries of the mining operation marked on a United States Geological Survey 71/2-minute or 15-minute quadrangle map.
(4)The lead agency.
(5)The approval date of the mining operations reclamation plan.
(6)The mining operations status as active, idle, reclaimed, or in the process of being reclaimed.
(7)The commodities produced by the mine and the type of mining operation.
(8)A copy of the previously completed annual inspection form and a requested date for the next annual inspection by the lead agency.
(9)Proof of financial assurances.
(10)Ownership of the property, including government agencies, if applicable, by the assessors parcel number, and total assessed value of the mining operation.
(11)The approximate permitted size of the mining operation subject to Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), in acres.
(12)The approximate total acreage of land newly disturbed by the mining operation during the previous calendar year.
(13)The approximate total of disturbed acreage reclaimed during the previous calendar year.
(14)The approximate total unreclaimed disturbed acreage remaining as of the end of the calendar year.
(15)The total production for each mineral commodity produced during the previous year.
(16)A copy of any approved reclamation plan and any amendments or conditions of approval to any existing reclamation plan approved by the lead agency.
(b)(1)Every year, not later than the date established by the director, the person submitting the report pursuant to subdivision (a) shall forward to the lead agency, upon forms furnished by the board, a report that provides all of the information specified in subdivision (a).
(2)The owner or operator of a mining operation shall allow access to the property to any governmental agency or the agent of any company providing financial assurances in connection with the reclamation plan in order that the reclamation can be carried out by the entity or company, in accordance with the provisions of the reclamation plan.
(c)Subsequent reports shall include only changes in the information submitted for the items described in subdivision (a), except that, instead of the approved reclamation plan, the reports shall include any reclamation plan amendments approved during the previous year. The reports shall state whether review of a reclamation plan, financial assurances, or an interim management plan is pending under subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (h) of Section 2770, or whether an appeal before the board or lead agency governing body is pending under subdivision (e) or (h) of Section 2770. The director shall notify the person submitting the report and the owners designated agent in writing that the report and the fee required pursuant to subdivision (d) have been received, specify the mining operations mine number if one has not been issued by the Office of Mine Reclamation, and notify the person and agent of any deficiencies in the report within 90 days of receipt. That person or agent shall have 30 days from receipt of the notification to correct the noted deficiencies and forward the revised report to the director and the lead agency. Any person who fails to comply with this section, or knowingly provides incorrect or false information in reports required by this section, may be subject to an administrative penalty as provided in subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1.
(d)(1)The board shall impose, by regulation, pursuant to paragraph (2), an annual reporting fee on, and method for collecting annual fees from, each active or idle mining operation. The maximum fee for any single mining operation may not exceed four thousand dollars ($4,000) annually and may not be less than one hundred dollars ($100) annually, as adjusted for the cost of living as measured by the California Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers, calendar year averages, using the percentage change in the previous year, beginning with the 200506 fiscal year and annually thereafter.
(2)(A)The board shall adopt, by regulation, a schedule of fees authorized under paragraph (1) to cover the departments cost in carrying out this section and Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), as reflected in the Governors proposed Budget, and may adopt those regulations as emergency regulations. In establishing the schedule of fees to be paid by each active and idle mining operation, the fees shall be calculated on an equitable basis reflecting the size and type of operation. The board shall also consider the total assessed value of the mining operation, the acreage disturbed by mining activities, and the acreage subject to the reclamation plan.
(B)Regulations adopted pursuant to this subdivision shall be adopted by the board in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code). The adoption of any emergency regulations pursuant to this subdivision shall be considered necessary to address an emergency and shall be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, and general welfare.
(3)The total revenue generated by the reporting fees may not exceed, and may be less than, the amount of three million five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000), as adjusted for the cost of living as measured by the California Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers, calendar year averages, using the percentage change in the previous year, beginning with the 200506 fiscal year and annually thereafter. If the director determines that the revenue collected during the preceding fiscal year was greater or less than the cost to operate the program, the board shall adjust the fees to compensate for the overcollection or undercollection of revenues.
(4)(A)The reporting fees established pursuant to this subdivision shall be deposited in the Mine Reclamation Account, which is hereby created. Any fees, penalties, interest, fines, or charges collected by the director or board pursuant to this chapter or Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710) shall be deposited in the Mine Reclamation Account. The money in the account shall be available to the department and board, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purpose of carrying out this section and complying with Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), which includes, but is not limited to, classification and designation of areas with mineral resources of statewide or regional significance, reclamation plan and financial assurance review, mine inspection, and enforcement.
(B)(i)In addition to reporting fees, the board shall collect five dollars ($5) per ounce of gold and ten cents ($0.10) per ounce of silver mined within the state and shall deposit the fees collected in the Abandoned Mine Reclamation and Minerals Fund Subaccount, which is hereby created in the Mine Reclamation Account. The department may expend the moneys in the subaccount, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for only the purposes of Section 2796.5 and as authorized herein for the remediation of abandoned mines.
(ii)Notwithstanding subdivision (j) of Section 2796.5, fees collected pursuant to clause (i) may also be used to remediate features of historic abandoned mines and lands that they impact. For the purposes of this section, historic abandoned mines are mines for which operations have been conducted before January 1, 1976, and include, but are not limited to, historic gold and silver mines.
(5)In case of late payment of the reporting fee, a penalty of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) or 10 percent of the amount due, whichever is greater, plus interest at the rate of 11/2 percent per month, computed from the delinquent date of the assessment until and including the date of payment, shall be assessed. New mining operations that have not submitted a report shall submit a report prior to commencement of operations. The new operation shall submit its fee according to the reasonable fee schedule adopted by the board, and the month that the report is received shall become that operations anniversary month.
(e)The lead agency, or the board when acting as the lead agency, may impose a fee upon each mining operation to cover the reasonable costs incurred in implementing this chapter and Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710).
(f)For purposes of this section, mining operation means a mining operation of any kind or character whatever in this state, including, but not limited to, a mining operation that is classified as a surface mining operation as defined in Section 2735, unless excepted by Section 2714. For the purposes of fee collections only, mining operation may include one or more mines operated by a single operator or mining company on one or more sites, if the total annual combined mineral production for all sites is less than 100 troy ounces for precious metals, if precious metals are the primary mineral commodity produced, or less than 100,000 short tons if the primary mineral commodity produced is not precious metals.
(g)Any information in reports submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) that includes or otherwise indicates the total mineral production, reserves, or rate of depletion of any mining operation may not be disclosed to any member of the public, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 6252 of the Government Code. Other portions of the reports are public records unless excepted by statute. Statistical bulletins based on these reports and published under Section 2205 shall be compiled to show, for the state as a whole and separately for each lead agency, the total of each mineral produced therein. In order not to disclose the production, reserves, or rate of depletion from any identifiable mining operation, no production figure shall be published or otherwise disclosed unless that figure is the aggregated production of not less than three mining operations. If the production figure for any lead agency would disclose the production, reserves, or rate of depletion of less than three mining operations or otherwise permit the reasonable inference of the production, reserves, or rate of depletion of any identifiable mining operation, that figure shall be combined with the same figure of not less than two other lead agencies without regard to the location of the lead agencies. The bulletin shall be published annually by June 30 or as soon thereafter as practicable.
(h)The approval of a form by the board pursuant to this section is not the adoption of a regulation for purposes of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code) and is not subject to that act.
SEC. 2.Section 2715.5 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2715.5.(a)The Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, in conjunction with a site specific plan deemed consistent by the lead agency with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, until December 31, 2017, shall be considered to be a functional equivalent of a reclamation plan for the purposes of this chapter. No other reclamation plan shall be required to be reviewed and approved for any excavation project subject to the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan that is conducted in conformance with an approved site specific plan that is consistent with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan and the standards specified in that plan governing erosion control, channel stabilization, habitat restoration, flood control, or infrastructure maintenance, if that plan is reviewed and approved by a lead agency pursuant to this chapter.
(b)For the purposes of this section, the board of supervisors of the county in which the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan is to be implemented shall prepare and file the annual report required to be prepared pursuant to Section 2207.
(c)Nothing in this section precludes an enforcement action by the board or the department brought pursuant to this chapter or Section 2207 if the lead agency or the director determines that a surface mining operator, acting under the authority of the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, is not in compliance with the requirements of this chapter or Section 2207.
(d)For purposes of this section, site specific plan means an individual project plan approved by the lead agency that is consistent with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan. Site specific plans prepared in conformance with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan shall include, at a minimum, the information required pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2772, shall comply with the requirements of Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and shall be provided along with a financial assurance estimate to the department for review and comment pursuant to Section 2772.1 or 2773.4, as applicable. Notwithstanding the number of days authorized by subdivision (b) of Section 2772.1 or subdivision (c) of Section 2773.4, the department shall review the site specific plan and the financial assurance estimate and prepare any written comments within 15 days from the date of receipt of the plan and the estimate.
(e)Prior to engaging in an excavation activity in conformance with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, a surface mining operation shall be required to obtain financial assurances that meet the requirements of Section 2773.1.
(f)This section shall remain in effect only until December 31, 2017, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute that is enacted before December 31, 2017, deletes or extends that date.
SEC. 3.Section 2733 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2733.Reclamation means the combined process of land treatment that minimizes water degradation, air pollution, damage to aquatic or wildlife habitat, flooding, erosion, and other adverse effects from surface mining operations, including adverse surface effects incidental to underground mines, so that mined lands are reclaimed to a usable condition that is readily adaptable for alternate land uses and create no danger to public health or safety. The process may extend to affected lands surrounding mined lands, and may require backfilling, grading, resoiling, revegetation, soil compaction, slope stabilization, or other measures.
SEC. 4.Section 2736 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2736.Financial assurances means a current approved financial assurance cost estimate and a financial assurance mechanism that is at least equal to the current approved financial assurance cost estimate.
SEC. 5.Section 2770 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2770.(a)Except as provided in this section, a person shall not conduct surface mining operations unless a permit is obtained from, a reclamation plan has been submitted to and approved by, and financial assurances for reclamation have been approved by the lead agency for the operation pursuant to this article.
(b)A person with an existing surface mining operation who has vested rights pursuant to Section 2776 and who does not have an approved reclamation plan shall submit a reclamation plan to the lead agency not later than March 31, 1988. If a reclamation plan application is not on file by March 31, 1988, the continuation of the surface mining operation is prohibited until a reclamation plan is submitted to the lead agency. For the purposes of this subdivision, a reclamation plan existing prior to January 1, 2016, may consist of all or the appropriate sections of any plans or written agreements previously approved by the lead agency or another agency, together with any additional documents needed to substantially meet the requirements of Sections 2772 and 2773 and the lead agency surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774, provided that all documents, which together were proposed to serve as the reclamation plan, are submitted for approval to the lead agency in accordance with this chapter.
(c)The review of financial assurances shall not be considered a project for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
(d)The lead agencys review of a reclamation plan submitted pursuant to subdivision (b) or of financial assurances pursuant to subdivision (c) is limited to whether the plan or the financial assurances substantially meet the applicable requirements of Sections 2772, 2773, 2773.1, and 2773.3 and the lead agency surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774, but, in any event, the lead agency shall require that financial assurances for reclamation be sufficient to perform reclamation of lands remaining disturbed. Reclamation plans or financial assurances determined to substantially meet these requirements shall be approved by the lead agency for purposes of this chapter. Reclamation plans or financial assurances determined not to substantially meet these requirements shall be returned to the operator within 60 days. The operator has 60 days to revise the plan or financial assurances to address identified deficiencies, at which time the revised plan or financial assurances shall be returned to the lead agency for review and approval. Except as specified in subdivision (e) or (i), unless the operator has filed on or before July 1, 1990, an appeal pursuant to subdivision (e) with regard to nonapproval of the reclamation plan, or has filed on or before January 1, 1994, an appeal pursuant to subdivision (e) with regard to nonapproval of financial assurances, and that appeal is pending before the board, the continuation of the surface mining operation is prohibited until a reclamation plan and financial assurances for reclamation are approved by the lead agency.
(e)A person who can substantiate, based on the evidence of the record, that a lead agency has either (1) failed to act according to due process or has relied on considerations not related to the specific applicable requirements of Sections 2772, 2773, 2773.1, and 2773.3 and the lead agency surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774, in reaching a decision to deny approval of a reclamation plan or financial assurances for reclamation, (2) failed to act within a reasonable time of receipt of a completed application, or (3) failed to review and approve reclamation plans or financial assurances as required by subdivision (d) or Sections 2772.1 and 2773.4, may appeal that action or inaction to the board. If the director has commented pursuant to Section 2773.4 that a financial assurance cost estimate is inadequate, the director may appeal the lead agencys approval of a financial assurance cost estimate on any of the grounds identified in this subdivision that were included in the directors comments pursuant to Article 7 (commencing with Section 3680) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
(f)The board may decline to hear an appeal if it determines that the appeal raises no substantial issues related to the lead agencys review pursuant to this section.
(g)Appeals that the board does not decline to hear shall be scheduled and heard at a public hearing within 45 days of the filing of the appeal or a longer period as may be mutually agreed upon by the board and the person filing the appeal. In hearing an appeal, the board shall only determine whether the reclamation plan or the financial assurances substantially meet the applicable requirements of Sections 2772, 2773, 2773.1, and 2773.3 and the lead agency surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774. A reclamation plan or financial assurances determined to meet these requirements shall be approved or upheld. A reclamation plan or financial assurances determined not to meet these requirements shall be returned with a notice of deficiencies, to the operator, who shall be granted, once only, a period of 30 days, or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the operator and the board, to correct the noted deficiencies and submit the revised reclamation plan or the revised financial assurances to the lead agency for review and approval.
(h)(1)Within 90 days of a surface mining operation becoming idle, as defined in Section 2727.1, the operator shall submit to the lead agency for review and approval an interim management plan. The review and approval of an interim management plan shall not be considered a project for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)). The approved interim management plan shall be considered an amendment to the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan for purposes of this chapter. The interim management plan shall provide measures the operator will implement to maintain the site in compliance with this chapter, including, but not limited to, all permit conditions.
(2)The interim management plan may remain in effect for a period not to exceed five years, at which time the lead agency shall do one of the following:
(A)Renew the interim management plan for an additional period not to exceed five years, which may be renewed for one additional five-year renewal period at the expiration of the first five-year renewal period, if the lead agency finds that the surface mining operator has complied fully with the interim management plan.
(B)Require the operator to commence reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan.
(3)The financial assurances required by Section 2773.1 shall remain in effect during the period that the surface mining operation is idle. If the surface mining operation is still idle after the expiration of its interim management plan, the operator shall commence reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan.
(4)Within 60 days of the receipt of the interim management plan or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the lead agency and the operator, the lead agency shall review and approve the plan in accordance with its ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774, so long as the plan satisfies the requirements of this subdivision, and so notify the operator in writing. Otherwise, the lead agency shall notify the operator in writing of any deficiencies in the plan. The operator shall have 30 days, or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the operator and the lead agency, to submit a revised plan.
(5)The lead agency shall approve or deny approval of the revised interim management plan within 60 days of receipt. If the lead agency denies approval of the revised interim management plan, the operator may appeal that action to the lead agencys governing body, which shall schedule a public hearing within 45 days of the filing of the appeal or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the operator and the governing body.
(6)Unless review of an interim management plan is pending before the lead agency or an appeal is pending before the lead agencys governing body, a surface mining operation that remains idle for over one year after becoming idle, as defined in Section 2727.1, without obtaining approval of an interim management plan shall be considered abandoned and the operator shall commence and complete reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan.
(i)An enforcement action that may be brought against a surface mining operation for operating without an approved reclamation plan, financial assurance, or interim management plan shall be held in abeyance pending review pursuant to subdivision (b), (d), or (h), or the resolution of an appeal filed with the board pursuant to subdivision (e), or with a lead agency governing body pursuant to subdivision (h).
SEC. 6.Section 2772 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2772.(a)The reclamation plan shall be filed with the lead agency, on a form provided by the lead agency, by any person who owns, leases, or otherwise controls or operates on all or any portion of any mined lands and who plans to conduct surface mining operations on the lands.
(b)The reclamation plan shall include a chart identifying the page number, chapter, appendix, or other specific location in the reclamation plan where content meeting the requirements, as applicable, of Sections 2772, 2773, and 2773.3 is located.
(c)The reclamation plan shall include all of the following information and documents:
(1)The name and address of the operator and the names and addresses of any persons designated by the operator as an agent for the service of process.
(2)The anticipated quantity and type of minerals for which the surface mining operation is to be conducted.
(3)The proposed dates for the initiation and completion of reclamation activities for the surface mining operation.
(4)The maximum anticipated depth of the surface mining operation.
(5)A reclamation plan map or maps that shall include all of the following:
(A)Size and legal description of the lands that will be affected by the surface mining operation and the names and addresses of the owners of all surface interests and mineral interests in the lands.
(B)Clearly defined and accurately drawn property lines, setbacks, and the reclamation plan boundary.
(C)Existing topography and final topography depicted with contour lines drawn at appropriate intervals for the sites conditions.
(D)Detailed geologic description of the area of the surface mining operation.
(E)Location of railroads, utility facilities, access roads, temporary roads to be reclaimed, and any roads remaining for the approved end use.
(F)All maps, diagrams, or calculations that require preparation in accordance with the Professional Engineers Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 6700) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code), the Geologist and Geophysicist Act (Chapter 12.5 (commencing with Section 7800) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code), or the Professional Land Surveyors Act (Chapter 15 (commencing with Section 8700) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) shall be prepared by a California-licensed professional, shall include his or her license number and name, and shall bear the signature and seal of the licensee.
(6)A description of and a plan for the type of surface mining to be employed and a time schedule that will provide for the completion of surface mining on each segment of the mined lands so that reclamation can be initiated at the earliest possible time on those portions of the mined lands that will not be subject to further disturbance by the surface mining operation.
(7)A description of the proposed use or potential uses of the mined lands after reclamation and evidence that all owners of a possessory interest in the land have been notified of the proposed use or potential uses.
(8)A description of the manner in which reclamation, adequate for the proposed use or potential uses, will be accomplished, including both of the following:
(A)A description of the manner in which known contaminants will be controlled and mining waste will be disposed.
(B)A description of the manner in which affected streambed channels and streambanks will be rehabilitated to a condition that minimizes erosion and sedimentation.
(9)An assessment of the effect of implementation of the reclamation plan on future mining in the area.
(10)A statement that the person submitting the reclamation plan accepts responsibility for reclaiming the mined lands in accordance with the reclamation plan.
(11)Any other information that the lead agency may require by ordinance.
(d)An item of information or a document required pursuant to subdivision (c) that has already been prepared as part of a permit application for the surface mining operation, or as part of an environmental document prepared for the project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) may be included in the reclamation plan by reference, if that item of information or that document is attached to the reclamation plan when the lead agency submits the reclamation plan to the director for review. To the extent the information, document, or component of a document referenced in the reclamation plan is used to meet the requirements of subdivision (c) or Section 2773 or 2773.3, the information, document, or component of a document shall become part of the reclamation plan and shall be subject to all other requirements of this article.
(e)Nothing in this section is intended to limit or expand the departments authority or responsibility to review a document in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
SEC. 7.Section 2772.1 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2772.1.(a)(1)Prior to approving a surface mining operations reclamation plan or plan amendment, the lead agency shall submit the reclamation plan or plan amendment to the director for review. The reclamation plan or plan amendment shall be submitted to the director as early as practicable in order to facilitate the review of the reclamation plan pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)). All documentation for the submission shall be submitted to the director at one time.
(2)An item of information, document, or component of a document that has been prepared as part of a permit application for the surface mining operation or as part of an environmental document prepared for the project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) shall be incorporated into the reclamation plan or plan amendment if it is used to satisfy the requirements of subdivision (c) of Section 2772 and Sections 2773 and 2773.3, if applicable. If an item of information, document, or component of a document is incorporated, reference to the item shall be added to the chart required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2772 and shall be properly indexed with the corresponding appendix reference and page numbers, if applicable. The item shall be included in an appendix to and shall become part of the reclamation plan or plan amendment. A technical report created by a California-licensed professional to support variations to the reclamation standards adopted by the board pursuant to Section 2773 shall be included in an appendix to the reclamation plan or plan amendment bearing the California-licensed professionals stamp or seal, as applicable.
(3)The lead agency shall certify to the director that the reclamation plan or plan amendment is a complete submission and is in substantial compliance with all of the following:
(A)The applicable requirements of this chapter.
(B)Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
(C)The lead agencys surface mining ordinance in effect at the time that the reclamation plan or plan amendment is submitted to the director for review.
(b)(1)The director shall have 15 days from the receipt of a reclamation plan or plan amendment to notify the lead agency and operator if the submission is incomplete. An incomplete submission is one that does not meet the content requirements of subdivision (a) of this section and subdivisions (c) and (d) of section 2772 and subdivision (a). Section 2772. The directors notice shall specifically identify all aspects of the submission that are incomplete. If the submission is incomplete due to the failure to include a professionally stamped copy of a technical report, map, or diagram that is required to be prepared by a California-licensed professional pursuant to subdivision (c) of section Section 2772, the director shall request a stamped copy of the technical report, map, or diagram only, instead of a full resubmission of the reclamation plan or plan amendment. The review time required pursuant to paragraph (2) shall begin when the stamped copy of the technical report, map, or diagram is received by the director. The directors time to review the reclamation plan or plan amendment shall commence upon the receipt of a submission that contains the item or items identified in the directors notice to the lead agency.
(2)The director shall have 45 days from the receipt of a complete reclamation plan or plan amendment to prepare written comments if the director chooses. The lead agency shall review and evaluate written comments received from the director relating to the reclamation plan or plan amendment within a reasonable amount of time.
(3)(A)The lead agency shall prepare a written response to the directors comments received pursuant to paragraph (2) describing the disposition of the major issues raised by the comments. The lead agency shall submit its response to the director at least 30 days prior to the intended approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment. The lead agencys response shall include either of the following:
(i)A description of how the lead agency proposes to adopt the directors comments to the reclamation plan or plan amendment.
(ii)A detailed description of the reasons why the lead agency proposes not to adopt the directors comments.
(B)Copies of any written comments received and responses prepared by the lead agency pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be forwarded to the operator.
(4)(A)The lead agency shall give the director at least 30 days notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing at which the reclamation plan or plan amendment is scheduled to be approved by the lead agency.
(B)If no hearing is required by this chapter, the local ordinance, or other state law, the lead agency shall provide 30 days notice to the director that the lead agency intends to approve the reclamation plan or plan amendment.
(5)(A)Within 60 days following approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment, the lead agency shall provide the director its final response to the directors written comments and the final approved copies of those documents. During that time, the department retains all of its powers, duties, and authorities pursuant to this chapter.
(B)The lead agencys final response shall include an index showing permit conditions of approval and binding mitigation measures adopted or certified pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) that are necessary to meet the requirements of subdivision (c) of Section 2772 and Sections 2773 and 2773.3. Those conditions of approval and mitigation measures shall be included in an appendix to the reclamation plan or plan amendment and shall be considered part of the reclamation compliance requirements and subject to the annual inspection requirements. To the extent those conditions of approval and mitigation measures are not subject to separate lead agency or other state or federal agency bonding or performance requirements, those conditions and measures shall be subject to the financial assurances requirements of this article.
(6)No later than 60 days after the approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment, the lead agency shall provide an official copy of the approved reclamation plan or plan amendment incorporating all approved modifications to the reclamation plan or plan amendment to the director.
(c)To the extent there is a conflict between the comments of a trustee agency or a responsible agency that are based on that agencys statutory or regulatory authority and the comments of other commenting agencies that are received by the lead agency pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) regarding a reclamation plan or plan amendments, the lead agency shall consider only the comments of the trustee agency or responsible agency.
(d)Nothing in this section is intended to limit or expand the departments authority or responsibility to review a document in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
SEC. 8.Section 2773.1 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2773.1.(a)Lead agencies shall require financial assurances of each surface mining operation to ensure reclamation is performed in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan, as follows:
(1)A financial assurance mechanism may take the form of surety bonds executed by an admitted surety insurer, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 995.120 of the Code of Civil Procedure, irrevocable letters of credit, trust funds, or other forms of financial assurances specified by the board pursuant to subdivision (e) that the lead agency reasonably determines are adequate to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan.
(2)The financial assurances shall remain in effect for the duration of the surface mining operation and any additional period until reclamation is completed.
(3)The amount of financial assurances required of a surface mining operation for any one year shall be reviewed and, if necessary, adjusted once each calendar year to account for new lands disturbed by surface mining operations, inflation, and reclamation of lands accomplished in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. An operator shall be required to replace an approved financial assurance mechanism to bond for the reclamation of the surface mining operation only if the financial assurance cost estimate identifies a need to increase the amount of the financial assurance mechanism.
(4)Financial assurance cost estimates shall be submitted to the lead agency for review on the form adopted by the board by regulation pursuant to subdivision (f). The estimates shall include estimates of the time needed to complete reclamation of the mine in accordance with the approved reclamation plan, including, but not limited to, any monitoring studies required by the reclamation plan.
(5)Each financial assurance mechanism shall be made payable to the lead agency and the department. A financial assurance mechanism shall not be released without the consent of the lead agency and the department. A financial assurance mechanism that was approved by the lead agency prior to January 1, 1993, and was made payable to the State Geologist shall be considered payable to the department for purposes of this chapter. However, if a surface mining operation has received approval of its financial assurances from a public agency other than the lead agency, the lead agency shall deem those financial assurances adequate for purposes of this section, or shall credit them toward fulfillment of the financial assurances required by this section, if they are made payable to the public agency, the lead agency, and the department and otherwise meet the requirements of this section. In any event, if a lead agency and one or more public agencies exercise jurisdiction over a surface mining operation, the total amount of financial assurances required by the lead agency and the public agencies for any one year shall not exceed that amount that is necessary to perform reclamation of lands remaining disturbed. For purposes of this paragraph, a public agency may include a federal agency.
(b)(1)If the lead agency, or the board when acting as a lead agency, has evidence that an operator may be financially incapable of completing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan or that the operator may have abandoned the surface mining operation without completing reclamation, the lead agency or board shall conduct a public hearing to determine whether the operator is financially capable of completing reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan or has abandoned the surface mining operation. The hearing shall be noticed to the operator and the director at least 30 days prior to the hearing.
(2)If the lead agency or the board, following the public hearing conducted pursuant to paragraph (1), determines that the operator is financially incapable of performing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan or has abandoned its surface mining operation without completing reclamation, either the lead agency or the director shall do all of the following:
(A)Notify the operator by personal service or certified mail that the lead agency or the director intends to take appropriate action to forfeit the financial assurances and specify the reasons for so doing.
(B)Proceed to take appropriate action to require forfeiture of the financial assurances.
(C)Use the proceeds from the forfeited financial assurances to conduct and complete reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. If the surface mining operation cannot be reclaimed in accordance with its approved reclamation plan, or the financial assurances are inadequate to reclaim in accordance with its approved reclamation plan, the lead agency or director may use seized forfeited financial assurances to reclaim or remediate mining disturbances as appropriate for the site conditions as determined by both the lead agency and the director. The financial assurances shall not be used for any other purpose. The operator is responsible for the costs of conducting and completing reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan or a remediation plan developed pursuant to this section as determined appropriate by both the lead agency and the director that are in excess of the proceeds from the forfeited financial assurances.
(c)Financial assurances shall no longer be required of a surface mining operation, and shall be released, upon the written concurrence of the lead agency and the director, which shall be forwarded to the operator and the institutions providing or holding the financial assurance mechanism, that reclamation has been completed in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. If a surface mining operation is sold or ownership is transferred to another person, the existing financial assurances shall remain in force and shall not be released by the lead agency and the director until new financial assurances are secured from the new owner and have been approved by the lead agency in accordance with Sections 2770, 2773.1, and 2773.4. Within 90 days of the sale or transfer of the surface mining operation, the new operator shall establish or maintain an appropriate financial assurance mechanism and sign a new statement of reclamation responsibility in accordance with paragraph (10) of subdivision (c) of Section 2772.
(d)The lead agency shall have primary responsibility to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and to reclaim mine sites pursuant to subdivision (b). However, if the board is not the lead agency pursuant to Section 2774.4, the director may act to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and reclaim mine sites pursuant to subdivision (b) only if both of the following occurs:
(1)The financial incapability of the operator or the abandonment of the surface mining operation has come to the attention of the director.
(2)The lead agency has been notified in writing by the director of the financial incapability of the operator or the abandonment of the surface mining operation for at least 15 days, the lead agency has not taken appropriate measures to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances and reclaim the mine site, and one of the following has occurred:
(A)The lead agency has been notified in writing by the director that failure to take appropriate measures to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances or to reclaim the mine site shall result in actions being taken against the lead agency under Section 2774.4.
(B)The director determines that there is a violation that amounts to an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health, safety, or to the environment.
(C)The lead agency notifies the director in writing that its good faith attempts to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances have not been successful.
The director shall comply with subdivision (b) in seeking forfeiture of financial assurances and reclaiming mine sites.
(e)The board may adopt regulations specifying financial assurance mechanisms other than surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, and trust funds, which the board determines are reasonably available and adequate to ensure reclamation pursuant to this chapter, but these mechanisms shall not include financial tests or surety bonds executed by one or more personal sureties. These mechanisms may include reclamation bond pool programs.
(f)The board shall adopt or revise guidelines to implement this section as necessary. The guidelines are exempt from the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code), and are not subject to review by the Office of Administrative Law.
SEC. 9.Section 2773.4 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2773.4.(a)(1)Prior to approving the financial assurances for a new reclamation plan or adjustments to financial assurances based on an amendment to a reclamation plan, the lead agency shall submit the financial assurance cost estimate to the director for review.
(2)The lead agency shall provide the director with a preliminary determination of whether the financial assurance cost estimate submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) is adequate, complete, and consistent with Section 2773.1.
(3)All documentation submitted to the director pursuant to this subdivision shall be submitted at one time.
(b)No later than 15 ___ days after receiving a financial assurance cost estimate, the director shall notify the lead agency and the operator if the submission is incomplete. An incomplete submission is one that does not meet the content requirements of Section 2773.1. The directors notice shall specifically identify all aspects of the submission that are incomplete. The directors time to review the financial assurance cost estimate shall commence upon the receipt of a submission that contains the aspects identified in the directors notice to the lead agency.
(c)(1)The director shall have 45 ___ days from the date of receipt of a complete financial assurance cost estimate to prepare written comments if the director chooses.
(2)The lead agency shall evaluate written comments received from the director relating to the financial assurances within a reasonable amount of time. The lead agency shall prepare a written response to the directors comments describing the disposition of the major issues raised by the directors comments.
(3)The lead agency shall submit its proposed response to the director at least 30 ___ days prior to approval of the financial assurance cost estimate. The lead agencys response shall include either of the following:
(A)A description of how the lead agency proposes to adopt the directors comments to the financial assurance cost estimate.
(B)A detailed description of the reasons why the lead agency proposes to reject the directors comments.
(4)Copies of any written comments received and responses prepared by the lead agency shall be forwarded to the operator.
(5)(A)The lead agency shall give the director at least 30 ___ days notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing at which the financial assurance cost estimate is scheduled to be approved by the lead agency. If no hearing is required by this chapter, local ordinance, or other state law, then the lead agency shall provide 30 ___ days notice to the director that it intends to approve the financial assurance cost estimate.
(B)The lead agency shall send to the director its final response to the directors comments within 30 ___ days following its approval of the financial assurance cost estimate, during which time the department retains all of its powers, duties, and authority pursuant to this chapter.
(d)(1)Within 30 ___ days of an annual inspection being conducted pursuant to Section 2774, an operator shall provide an annual financial assurance cost estimate to the lead agency for review.
(2)Within 60 ___ days of receiving an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate, the lead agency shall do both of the following:
(A)Review the annual financial assurance cost estimate for adequacy and completeness consistent with Section 2773.1.
(B)Submit the annual financial assurance cost estimate to the director for review.
(3)All documentation submitted to the director pursuant to this subdivision shall be submitted at one time.
(4)The lead agency shall provide the director with a preliminary determination of whether the annual financial assurance cost estimate submitted pursuant to this subdivision is adequate, complete, and consistent with Section 2773.1.
(5)Within 15 ___ days of receiving an annual financial assurance cost estimate, the director shall notify the lead agency and the operator if the submission is incomplete. An incomplete submission is one that does not meet the content requirements of Section 2773.1. The directors notice shall specifically identify all aspects of the submission that are incomplete. The directors time to review the annual financial assurance cost estimate shall commence upon the receipt of a submission that contains the aspects identified in the directors notice to the lead agency.
(6)(A)Within 45 ___ days of receiving an operators complete annual financial assurance cost estimate from the lead agency, the director shall prepare written comments on the operators financial assurances and provide the comments to the lead agency and the operator, operator if the director so chooses.
(B)Within 30 ___ days from receiving the directors written comments pursuant to this subdivision, the lead agency shall evaluate the written comments and provide the director and operator its proposed response to the director.
(C)Within 60 ___ days of receiving the directors written comments, or the due date of the directors written comments if they are not received, the lead agency shall accept or reject an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate. In approving a financial assurance cost estimate, the lead agency, with the concurrence of the operator, may modify the financial assurance cost estimate as necessary to correct deficiencies identified by the director or lead agency.
(D)Within 30 ___ days of the lead agencys acceptance of the annual financial assurance cost estimate, the lead agency shall send the director its final response to the directors comments.
(7)If the lead agency determines an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate is inadequate, the lead agency shall specify the reasons for that determination. The operator shall have 30 ___ days to appeal that denial pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2770 or provide a revised financial assurance cost estimate incorporating the suggested changes to the director and the lead agency for approval by the lead agency.
(e)(1)Within 30 ___ days of the lead agencys approval of a financial assurance cost estimate pursuant to this section, the operator shall provide the lead agency and the director an appropriate financial assurance mechanism. The operator shall provide this financial assurance mechanism even if the director has appealed the approval pursuant to subdivision (e) of section Section 2770.
(2)Within 15 ___ days of receiving a financial assurance mechanism pursuant to this subdivision, the lead agency and the director shall review the financial assurance mechanism to determine if the type of mechanism, including the release instructions, meets the requirements of this chapter.
(3)A financial assurance mechanism utilizing any of the forms provided as Appendix D, Appendix E-1, Appendix E-2, Appendix E-3, and Appendix F to the guidelines adopted by the board pursuant to subdivision (f) of section 2773.1 shall be deemed to meet the requirements of this chapter. A financial assurance mechanism considered by the lead agency or the director to not meet the requirements of this chapter shall be returned to the operator with correction instructions as to the type and release language of the financial assurance mechanism.
SEC. 10.Section 2774 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.(a)Every lead agency shall adopt ordinances in accordance with state policy that establish procedures for the review and approval of reclamation plans and financial assurances and the issuance of a permit to conduct surface mining operations, except that any lead agency without an active surface mining operation in its jurisdiction may defer adopting an implementing ordinance until the filing of a permit application. The ordinances shall establish procedures requiring at least one public hearing and shall be periodically reviewed by the lead agency and revised, as necessary, to ensure that the ordinances continue to be in accordance with state policy.
(b)Surface mining operations shall be inspected annually, solely to determine whether the surface mining operation is in compliance with its reclamation plan as described in subdivision (c) of Section 2772. this chapter. The lead agency shall cause an inspection to be conducted by a state licensed state-licensed geologist, state licensed state-licensed civil engineer, state licensed state-licensed landscape architect, state licensed state-licensed forester, or a lead agency employee who is experienced in land reclamation and who has not been employed by the surface mining operation being inspected in any capacity during the previous 12 months, except that a lead agency employee may inspect surface mining operations conducted by another department within the local agency. All inspections shall be conducted using a form developed by the department and approved by the board that includes the professional licensing and disciplinary information of the person who conducted the inspection. The operator shall be solely responsible for the reasonable cost of the inspection. The lead agency shall provide a notice of completion of inspection to the director within 90 days of conducting the inspection. The notice shall contain a statement regarding the surface mining operations compliance with its approved reclamation plan, as described in subdivision (c) of Section 2772, this chapter, a copy of the completed inspection form, and which aspects of the surface mining operations, if any, are inconsistent with its approved reclamation plan, as described in subdivision (c) of Section 2772, this chapter, and any corrective measures recommended by the inspector. If the surface mining operation has a review of its reclamation plan, financial assurances, or an interim management plan pending under subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (h) of Section 2770, or an appeal pending before the board or lead agency governing body under subdivision (e) or (h) of Section 2770, the notice shall so indicate. The lead agency shall forward to the operator a copy of the notice, a copy of the completed inspection form, and any supporting documentation, including, but not limited to, any inspection report prepared by the geologist, civil engineer, landscape architect, forester, or lead agency employee who conducted the inspection.
(c)If an operator does not request an inspection date on the annual report filed pursuant to Section 2207 or if the lead agency is unable to cause the inspection of a given surface mining operation on the date requested by the operator, the lead agency shall provide the operator with a minimum of five days written notice of a pending inspection or a lesser time period if agreed to by the operator.
(d)(1)No later than April 1 of each year, the director shall provide each lead agency with a notice listing each active or idle surface mining operation within the lead agencys jurisdiction. For each surface mining operation, the director shall request and the lead agency shall provide to the director, on a form provided by the director, no later than July 1 of each year the following information:
(A)A copy of any permit or reclamation plan amendments, as applicable.
(B)A statement that there have been no changes during the previous year, as applicable.
(C)The date of each surface mining operations last inspection.
(D)The date of each surface mining operations last financial assurance review pursuant to Section 2773.1 for each operation listed.
(2)The director shall request similar information on any new or omitted operations, to be provided to the director no later than July 1 of each year.
(e)(1)After January 1, 2018, a lead agency employee who is not a state-licensed geologist, state-licensed civil engineer, state-licensed landscape architect, or a state-license state-licensed forester and who inspects surface mining operations under this chapter shall have completed an inspection workshop or an update workshop provided by the director. The director shall provide an adequate transition time period for lead agency inspectors to complete the update workshop if it becomes necessary.
(2)Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to affect or impose qualifications or standards on employees designated by a local, state, or federal agency to perform inspections of real property under separate provisions of local, state, or federal law, including, but not limited to, the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code), the federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.), and the Fish and Game Code, notwithstanding the fact that that informational addenda are submitted to lead agencies pursuant to this chapter in addition to reclamation plans, including materials submitted pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 2772.
SEC. 11.Section 2774.2 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.2.(a)Within 30 days of the issuance of an order setting administrative penalties under subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1, the operator may petition that the legislative body of the lead agency, if the lead agency has issued the order, or the board for orders issued by the director, for review of the order. If the operator does not petition for review within the time limits set by this subdivision, the order setting administrative penalties shall not be subject to review by any court or agency.
(b)The legislative body of the lead agency or the board shall notify the operator by personal service or certified mail whether it will review the order setting administrative penalties. In reviewing an order pursuant to this section, the record shall consist of the record before the lead agency or the director and any other relevant evidence which, in the judgment of the legislative body or the board, should be considered to effectuate and implement the policies of this chapter.
(c)The legislative body or the board may affirm, modify, or set aside, in whole or in part, by its own order an order of the lead agency or the director setting administrative penalties reviewed by the legislative body or the board pursuant to this section.
(d)An order of the legislative body or the board issued under subdivision (c) shall become effective upon its issuance unless the operator petitions the superior court for review as provided in subdivision (e). An order shall be served by personal service or by certified mail upon the operator. Payment of an administrative penalty that is specified in an order issued pursuant to subdivision (c) shall be made to the lead agency or the director within 30 days of service of the order. However, the payment shall be held in an interest bearing impound account pending the resolution of a petition for review filed pursuant to subdivision (e).
(e)An operator aggrieved by an order of the legislative body or the board issued pursuant to subdivision (c) may obtain review of the order by filing in the superior court a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days following the issuance of the order. An operator aggrieved by an order of a lead agency or the director setting administrative penalties pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1, for which the legislative body or board denies review, may obtain review of the order in the superior court by filing in the court a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days following the denial of review. The provisions of Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall govern judicial proceedings pursuant to this subdivision, except that in every case the court shall exercise its independent judgment. If the operator does not petition for a writ of mandate within the time limits set by this subdivision, an order of the board or the legislative body shall not be subject to review by any court or agency.
(f)(1)After the expiration of the time to petition for review pursuant to subdivision (a) or (e), the director or the board acting as the lead agency may apply to the small claims court or the superior court, depending on the jurisdictional amount, in the county where the administrative penalty was imposed for a judgment to collect the unpaid administrative penalty imposed pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1. The application shall include all of the following:
(A)The order setting the administrative penalty pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1.
(B)A notice to the operator of the right to petition for review of the order.
(C)Either of the following:
(i)A declaration from the board that no petition was made or that the board declined to review the petition.
(ii)A copy of the final order of the board.
(2)An application submitted pursuant to this subdivision shall constitute a sufficient showing to warrant the issuance of the judgment. The court clerk shall enter the judgment immediately in conformity with the application.
(3)The judgment entered pursuant to this subdivision shall have the same force and effect as, and shall be subject to all the provisions of law relating to, a judgment in a civil action and may be enforced in the same manner as any other judgment of the court. The court shall make enforcement of the judgment a priority.
SEC. 12.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
(a)The owner or the operator of a mining operation within the state shall forward to the director annually, not later than a date established by the director, upon forms approved by the board from time to time, a report that identifies and contains all of the following:
(1)The name, address, and telephone number of the person, company, or other owner of the mining operation.
(2)The name, address, and telephone number of a designated agent who resides in this state, and who will receive and accept service of all orders, notices, and processes of the lead agency, board, director, or court.
(3)The location of the mining operation, its name, its mine number as issued by the Office of Mine Reclamation or the director, its section, township, range, latitude, longitude, and approximate boundaries of the mining operation marked on a United States Geological Survey 71/2-minute or 15-minute quadrangle map.
(4)The lead agency.
(5)The approval date of the mining operations reclamation plan.
(6)The mining operations status as active, idle, reclaimed, or in the process of being reclaimed.
(7)The commodities produced by the mine and the type of mining operation.
(8)A copy of the previously completed annual inspection form and a requested date for the next annual inspection by the lead agency.
(9)Proof of financial assurances.
(10)Ownership of the property, including government agencies, if applicable, by the assessors parcel number, and total assessed value of the mining operation.
(11)The approximate permitted size of the mining operation subject to Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), in acres.
(12)The approximate total acreage of land newly disturbed by the mining operation during the previous calendar year.
(13)The approximate total of disturbed acreage reclaimed during the previous calendar year.
(14)The approximate total unreclaimed disturbed acreage remaining as of the end of the calendar year.
(15)The total production for each mineral commodity produced during the previous year.
(16)A copy of any approved reclamation plan and any amendments or conditions of approval to any existing reclamation plan approved by the lead agency.
(b)(1)Every year, not later than the date established by the director, the person submitting the report pursuant to subdivision (a) shall forward to the lead agency, upon forms furnished by the board, a report that provides all of the information specified in subdivision (a).
(2)The owner or operator of a mining operation shall allow access to the property to any governmental agency or the agent of any company providing financial assurances in connection with the reclamation plan in order that the reclamation can be carried out by the entity or company, in accordance with the provisions of the reclamation plan.
(c)Subsequent reports shall include only changes in the information submitted for the items described in subdivision (a), except that, instead of the approved reclamation plan, the reports shall include any reclamation plan amendments approved during the previous year. The reports shall state whether review of a reclamation plan, financial assurances, or an interim management plan is pending under subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (h) of Section 2770, or whether an appeal before the board or lead agency governing body is pending under subdivision (e) or (h) of Section 2770. The director shall notify the person submitting the report and the owners designated agent in writing that the report and the fee required pursuant to subdivision (d) have been received, specify the mining operations mine number if one has not been issued by the Office of Mine Reclamation, and notify the person and agent of any deficiencies in the report within 90 days of receipt. That person or agent shall have 30 days from receipt of the notification to correct the noted deficiencies and forward the revised report to the director and the lead agency. Any person who fails to comply with this section, or knowingly provides incorrect or false information in reports required by this section, may be subject to an administrative penalty as provided in subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1.
(d)(1)The board shall impose, by regulation, pursuant to paragraph (2), an annual reporting fee on, and method for collecting annual fees from, each active or idle mining operation. The maximum fee for any single mining operation may not exceed four thousand dollars ($4,000) annually and may not be less than one hundred dollars ($100) annually, as adjusted for the cost of living as measured by the California Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers, calendar year averages, using the percentage change in the previous year, beginning with the 200506 fiscal year and annually thereafter.
(2)(A)The board shall adopt, by regulation, a schedule of fees authorized under paragraph (1) to cover the departments cost in carrying out this section and Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), as reflected in the Governors proposed Budget, and may adopt those regulations as emergency regulations. In establishing the schedule of fees to be paid by each active and idle mining operation, the fees shall be calculated on an equitable basis reflecting the size and type of operation. The board shall also consider the total assessed value of the mining operation, the acreage disturbed by mining activities, and the acreage subject to the reclamation plan.
(B)Regulations adopted pursuant to this subdivision shall be adopted by the board in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code). The adoption of any emergency regulations pursuant to this subdivision shall be considered necessary to address an emergency and shall be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, and general welfare.
(3)The total revenue generated by the reporting fees may not exceed, and may be less than, the amount of three million five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000), as adjusted for the cost of living as measured by the California Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers, calendar year averages, using the percentage change in the previous year, beginning with the 200506 fiscal year and annually thereafter. If the director determines that the revenue collected during the preceding fiscal year was greater or less than the cost to operate the program, the board shall adjust the fees to compensate for the overcollection or undercollection of revenues.
(4)(A)The reporting fees established pursuant to this subdivision shall be deposited in the Mine Reclamation Account, which is hereby created. Any fees, penalties, interest, fines, or charges collected by the director or board pursuant to this chapter or Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710) shall be deposited in the Mine Reclamation Account. The money in the account shall be available to the department and board, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purpose of carrying out this section and complying with Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), which includes, but is not limited to, classification and designation of areas with mineral resources of statewide or regional significance, reclamation plan and financial assurance review, mine inspection, and enforcement.
(B)(i)In addition to reporting fees, the board shall collect five dollars ($5) per ounce of gold and ten cents ($0.10) per ounce of silver mined within the state and shall deposit the fees collected in the Abandoned Mine Reclamation and Minerals Fund Subaccount, which is hereby created in the Mine Reclamation Account. The department may expend the moneys in the subaccount, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for only the purposes of Section 2796.5 and as authorized herein for the remediation of abandoned mines.
(ii)Notwithstanding subdivision (j) of Section 2796.5, fees collected pursuant to clause (i) may also be used to remediate features of historic abandoned mines and lands that they impact. For the purposes of this section, historic abandoned mines are mines for which operations have been conducted before January 1, 1976, and include, but are not limited to, historic gold and silver mines.
(5)In case of late payment of the reporting fee, a penalty of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) or 10 percent of the amount due, whichever is greater, plus interest at the rate of 11/2 percent per month, computed from the delinquent date of the assessment until and including the date of payment, shall be assessed. New mining operations that have not submitted a report shall submit a report prior to commencement of operations. The new operation shall submit its fee according to the reasonable fee schedule adopted by the board, and the month that the report is received shall become that operations anniversary month.
(e)The lead agency, or the board when acting as the lead agency, may impose a fee upon each mining operation to cover the reasonable costs incurred in implementing this chapter and Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710).
(f)For purposes of this section, mining operation means a mining operation of any kind or character whatever in this state, including, but not limited to, a mining operation that is classified as a surface mining operation as defined in Section 2735, unless excepted by Section 2714. For the purposes of fee collections only, mining operation may include one or more mines operated by a single operator or mining company on one or more sites, if the total annual combined mineral production for all sites is less than 100 troy ounces for precious metals, if precious metals are the primary mineral commodity produced, or less than 100,000 short tons if the primary mineral commodity produced is not precious metals.
(g)Any information in reports submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) that includes or otherwise indicates the total mineral production, reserves, or rate of depletion of any mining operation may not be disclosed to any member of the public, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 6252 of the Government Code. Other portions of the reports are public records unless excepted by statute. Statistical bulletins based on these reports and published under Section 2205 shall be compiled to show, for the state as a whole and separately for each lead agency, the total of each mineral produced therein. In order not to disclose the production, reserves, or rate of depletion from any identifiable mining operation, no production figure shall be published or otherwise disclosed unless that figure is the aggregated production of not less than three mining operations. If the production figure for any lead agency would disclose the production, reserves, or rate of depletion of less than three mining operations or otherwise permit the reasonable inference of the production, reserves, or rate of depletion of any identifiable mining operation, that figure shall be combined with the same figure of not less than two other lead agencies without regard to the location of the lead agencies. The bulletin shall be published annually by June 30 or as soon thereafter as practicable.
(h)The approval of a form by the board pursuant to this section is not the adoption of a regulation for purposes of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code) and is not subject to that act.
SEC. 2.Section 2715.5 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2715.5.(a)The Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, in conjunction with a site specific plan deemed consistent by the lead agency with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, until December 31, 2017, shall be considered to be a functional equivalent of a reclamation plan for the purposes of this chapter. No other reclamation plan shall be required to be reviewed and approved for any excavation project subject to the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan that is conducted in conformance with an approved site specific plan that is consistent with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, Plan and the standards specified in that plan governing erosion control, channel stabilization, habitat restoration, flood control, or infrastructure maintenance, if that plan is reviewed and approved by a lead agency pursuant to this chapter.
(b)For the purposes of this section, the board of supervisors of the county in which the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan is to be implemented shall prepare and file the annual report required to be prepared pursuant to Section 2207.
(c)Nothing in this section precludes an enforcement action by the board or the department brought pursuant to this chapter or Section 2207 if the lead agency or the director determines that a surface mining operator, acting under the authority of the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, is not in compliance with the requirements of this chapter or Section 2207.
(d)Site For purposes of this section, site specific plan, for the purposes of this section, plan means an individual project plan approved by the lead agency that is consistent with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan. Site specific plans prepared in conformance with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan shall, at a minimum, include, at a minimum, the information required pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2772, shall comply with the requirements of Article 9 (commencing with Section 3700) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and shall be provided along with a financial assurance estimate to the department for review and comment pursuant to Section 2774. 2772.1 or 2773.4, as applicable. Notwithstanding the number of days authorized by paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) (b) of Section 2774, 2772.1 or subdivision (c) of Section 2773.4, the department shall review the site specific plan and the financial assurance estimate and prepare any written comments within 15 days from the date of receipt of the plan and the estimate.
(e)Prior to engaging in an excavation activity in conformance with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan, a surface mining operation shall be required to obtain financial assurances that meet the requirements of Section 2773.1.
(f)This section shall remain in effect only until December 31, 2017, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute that is enacted before December 31, 2017, deletes or extends that date.
SEC. 3.Section 2733 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2733.Reclamation means the combined process of land treatment that minimizes water degradation, air pollution, damage to aquatic or wildlife habitat, flooding, erosion, and other adverse effects from surface mining operations, including adverse surface effects incidental to underground mines, so that mined lands are reclaimed to a usable condition which that is readily adaptable for alternate land uses and create no danger to public health or safety. The process may extend to affected lands surrounding mined lands, and may require backfilling, grading, resoiling, revegetation, soil compaction, slope stabilization, or other measures.
SEC. 4.Section 2736 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2736.Financial assurances means a current approved financial assurance cost estimate and a financial assurance mechanism that is at least equal to the current approved financial assurance cost estimate.
SEC. 5.Section 2770 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2770.(a)Except as provided in this section, a person shall not conduct surface mining operations unless a permit is obtained from, a reclamation plan has been submitted to and approved by, and financial assurances for reclamation have been approved by, by the lead agency for the operation pursuant to this article.
(b)A person with an existing surface mining operation who has vested rights pursuant to Section 2776 and who does not have an approved reclamation plan shall submit a reclamation plan to the lead agency not later than March 31, 1988. If a reclamation plan application is not on file by March 31, 1988, the continuation of the surface mining operation is prohibited until a reclamation plan is submitted to the lead agency. For the purposes of this subdivision, a reclamation plan existing prior to January 1, 2016, may consist of all or the appropriate sections of any plans or written agreements previously approved by the lead agency or another agency, together with any additional documents needed to substantially meet the requirements of Sections 2772 and 2773 and the lead agency surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774, provided that all documents documents, which together were proposed to serve as the reclamation plan plan, are submitted for approval to the lead agency in accordance with this chapter.
(c)If a person with an existing surface mining operation has received lead agency approval of its financial assurances for reclamation prior to January 1, 1991, the lead agency shall administratively review those existing financial assurances in accordance with subdivision (d) prior to January 1, 1992. The review of existing financial assurances shall not be considered a project for purposes of Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000). A person with an existing surface mining operation that does not have financial assurances that received lead agency approval prior to January 1, 1991, shall submit financial assurances for reclamation for review in accordance with subdivision (d).
(c)The review of financial assurances shall not be considered a project for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
(d)The lead agencys review of a reclamation plan submitted pursuant to subdivision (b) or of financial assurances pursuant to subdivision (c) is limited to whether the plan or the financial assurances substantially meet the applicable requirements of Sections 2772, 2773, and 2773.1, and 2773.3 and the lead agency surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774, but, in any event, the lead agency shall require that financial assurances for reclamation be sufficient to perform reclamation of lands remaining disturbed. Reclamation plans or financial assurances determined to substantially meet these requirements shall be approved by the lead agency for purposes of this chapter. Reclamation plans or financial assurances determined not to substantially meet these requirements shall be returned to the operator within 60 days. The operator has 60 days to revise the plan or financial assurances to address identified deficiencies, at which time the revised plan or financial assurances shall be returned to the lead agency for review and approval. Except as specified in subdivision (e) or (i), unless the operator has filed on or before July 1, 1990, an appeal pursuant to subdivision (e) with regard to nonapproval of the reclamation plan, or has filed on or before January 1, 1994, an appeal pursuant to subdivision (e) with regard to nonapproval of financial assurances, and that appeal is pending before the board, the continuation of the surface mining operation is prohibited until a reclamation plan and financial assurances for reclamation are approved by the lead agency.
(e)A person who, based on the evidence of the record, can substantiate, based on the evidence of the record, that a lead agency has either (1) failed to act according to due process or has relied on considerations not related to the specific applicable requirements of Sections 2772, 2773, and 2773.1, and 2773.3 and the lead agency surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774, in reaching a decision to deny approval of a reclamation plan or financial assurances for reclamation, (2) failed to act within a reasonable time of receipt of a completed application, or (3) failed to review and approve reclamation plans or financial assurances as required by subdivisions (c) and subdivision (d) or Sections 2772.1 and 2773.4, may appeal that action or inaction to the board. If the director has commented pursuant to Section 2773.4 that a financial assurance cost estimate is inadequate, the director may appeal the lead agencys approval of a financial assurance cost estimate on any of the grounds identified in this subdivision that were included in the directors comments pursuant to Article 7 (commencing with Section 3680) of Subchapter 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
(f)The board may decline to hear an appeal if it determines that the appeal raises no substantial issues related to the lead agencys review pursuant to this section.
(g)Appeals that the board does not decline to hear shall be scheduled and heard at a public hearing within 45 days of the filing of the appeal, appeal or a longer period as may be mutually agreed upon by the board and the person filing the appeal. In hearing an appeal, the board shall only determine whether the reclamation plan or the financial assurances substantially meet the applicable requirements of Sections 2772, 2773, and 2773.1, and 2773.3 and the lead agency surface mining ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774. A reclamation plan or financial assurances determined to meet these requirements shall be approved or upheld. A reclamation plan or financial assurances determined not to meet these requirements shall be returned to the person filing the appeal with a notice of deficiencies, to the operator, who shall be granted, once only, a period of 30 days, or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the operator and the board, to correct the noted deficiencies and submit the revised reclamation plan or the revised financial assurances to the lead agency for review and approval.
(h)(1)Within 90 days of a surface mining operation becoming idle, as defined in Section 2727.1, the operator shall submit to the lead agency for review and approval, approval an interim management plan. The review and approval of an interim management plan shall not be considered a project for purposes of Division the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000). 21000)). The approved interim management plan shall be considered an amendment to the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan, plan for purposes of this chapter. The interim management plan shall provide measures the operator will implement to maintain the site in compliance with this chapter, including, but not limited to, all permit conditions.
(2)The interim management plan may remain in effect for a period not to exceed five years, at which time the lead agency shall do one of the following:
(A)Renew the interim management plan for an additional period not to exceed five years, which may be renewed for one additional five-year renewal period at the expiration of the first five-year renewal period, if the lead agency finds that the surface mining operator has complied fully with the interim management plan.
(B)Require the surface mining operator to commence reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan.
(3)The financial assurances required by Section 2773.1 shall remain in effect during the period that the surface mining operation is idle. If the surface mining operation is still idle after the expiration of its interim management plan, the surface mining operation operator shall commence reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan.
(4)Within 60 days of the receipt of the interim management plan, plan or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the lead agency and the operator, the lead agency shall review and approve the plan in accordance with its ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 2774, so long as the plan satisfies the requirements of this subdivision, and so notify the operator in writing. Otherwise, the lead agency shall notify the operator in writing of any deficiencies in the plan. The operator shall have 30 days, or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the operator and the lead agency, to submit a revised plan.
(5)The lead agency shall approve or deny approval of the revised interim management plan within 60 days of receipt. If the lead agency denies approval of the revised interim management plan, the operator may appeal that action to the lead agencys governing body, which shall schedule a public hearing within 45 days of the filing of the appeal, appeal or a longer period mutually agreed upon by the operator and the governing body.
(6)Unless review of an interim management plan is pending before the lead agency, agency or an appeal is pending before the lead agencys governing body, a surface mining operation that remains idle for over one year after becoming idle idle, as defined in Section 2727.1 2727.1, without obtaining approval of an interim management plan shall be considered abandoned and the operator shall commence and complete reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan.
(i)An enforcement action that may be brought against a surface mining operation for operating without an approved reclamation plan, financial assurance, or interim management plan shall be held in abeyance pending review pursuant to subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (h), or the resolution of an appeal filed with the board pursuant to subdivision (e), or with a lead agency governing body pursuant to subdivision (h).
SEC. 6.Section 2772 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2772.(a)The reclamation plan shall be filed with the lead agency, on a form provided by the lead agency, by any person who owns, leases, or otherwise controls or operates on all, all or any portion of any, any mined lands, lands and who plans to conduct surface mining operations on the lands.
(b)All documentation for the reclamation plan shall be submitted by the lead agency to the department at one time.
(b)The reclamation plan shall include a chart identifying the page number, chapter, appendix, or other specific location in the reclamation plan where content meeting the requirements, as applicable, of Sections 2772, 2773, and 2773.3 is located.
(c)The reclamation plan shall include all of the following information and documents:
(1)The name and address of the surface mining operator and the names and addresses of any persons designated by the operator as an agent for the service of process.
(2)The anticipated quantity and type of minerals for which the surface mining operation is to be conducted.
(3)The proposed dates for the initiation and termination of completion of reclamation activities for the surface mining operation.
(4)The maximum anticipated depth of the surface mining operation.
(5)The size and legal description of the lands that will be affected by the surface mining operation, a map that includes the boundaries and topographic details of the lands, a description of the general geology of the area, a detailed description of the geology of the area in which surface mining is to be conducted, the location of all streams, roads, railroads, and utility facilities within, or adjacent to, the lands, the location of all proposed access roads to be constructed in conducting the surface mining operation, and the names and addresses of the owners of all surface interests and mineral interests in the lands.
(5)A reclamation plan map or maps that shall include all of the following:
(A)Size and legal description of the lands that will be affected by the surface mining operation and the names and addresses of the owners of all surface interests and mineral interests in the lands.
(B)Clearly defined and accurately drawn property lines, setbacks, and the reclamation plan boundary.
(C)Existing topography and final topography depicted with contour lines drawn at appropriate intervals for the sites conditions.
(D)Detailed geologic description of the area of the surface mining operation.
(E)Location of railroads, utility facilities, access roads, temporary roads to be reclaimed, and any roads remaining for the approved end use.
(F)All maps, diagrams, or calculations that require preparation in accordance with the Professional Engineers Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 6700) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code), the Geologist and Geophysicist Act (Chapter 12.5 (commencing with Section 7800) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code), or the Professional Land Surveyors Act (Chapter 15 (commencing with Section 8700) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) shall be prepared by a California-licensed professional, shall include his or her license number and name, and shall bear the signature and seal of the licensee.
(6)A description of, of and a plan for, for the type of surface mining to be employed, employed and a time schedule that will provide for the completion of surface mining on each segment of the mined lands so that reclamation can be initiated at the earliest possible time on those portions of the mined lands that will not be subject to further disturbance by the surface mining operation.
(7)A description of the proposed use or potential uses of the mined lands after reclamation and evidence that all owners of a possessory interest in the land have been notified of the proposed use or potential uses.
(8)A description of the manner in which reclamation, adequate for the proposed use or potential uses uses, will be accomplished, including both of the following:
(A)A description of the manner in which known contaminants will be controlled, controlled and mining waste will be disposed.
(B)A description of the manner in which affected streambed channels and streambanks will be rehabilitated to a condition minimizing that minimizes erosion and sedimentation will occur. sedimentation.
(9)An assessment of the effect of implementation of the reclamation plan on future mining in the area.
(10)A statement that the person submitting the reclamation plan accepts responsibility for reclaiming the mined lands in accordance with the reclamation plan.
(11)Any other information which that the lead agency may require by ordinance.
(d)An item of information or a document required pursuant to subdivision (c) that has already been prepared as part of a permit application for the surface mining operation, or as part of an environmental document prepared for the project pursuant to Division the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000), 21000)) may be included in the reclamation plan by reference, if that item of information or that document is attached to the reclamation plan when the lead agency submits the reclamation plan to the director for review. To the extent that the information or, document, or component of a document referenced in the reclamation plan is used to meet the requirements of subdivision (c) or Section 2773 or 2773.3, the information or, document, or component of a document shall become part of the reclamation plan and shall be subject to all other requirements of this article.
(e)Nothing in this section is intended to limit or expand the departments authority or responsibility to review a document in accordance with Division the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000). 21000)).
SEC. 7.Section 2772.1 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2772.1.(a)(1)Prior to approving a surface mining operations reclamation plan or plan amendment, the lead agency shall submit the reclamation plan or plan amendment to the director for review. The reclamation plan or plan amendment shall be submitted to the director as early as practicable in order to facilitate the review of the reclamation plan pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)). All documentation for the submission shall be submitted to the director at one time.
(2)An item of information, document, or component of a document that has been prepared as part of a permit application for the surface mining operation or as part of an environmental document prepared for the project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) shall be incorporated into the reclamation plan or plan amendment if it is used to satisfy the requirements of subdivision (c) of Section 2772 and Sections 2773 and 2773.3, if applicable. If an item of information, document, or component of a document is incorporated, reference to the item shall be added to the chart required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2772 and shall be properly indexed with the corresponding appendix reference and page numbers, if applicable. The item shall be included in an appendix to and shall become part of the reclamation plan or plan amendment. A technical report created by a California-licensed professional to support variations to the reclamation standards adopted by the board pursuant to Section 2773 shall be included in an appendix to the reclamation plan or plan amendment bearing the California-licensed professionals stamp or seal, as applicable.
(3)The lead agency shall certify to the director that the reclamation plan or plan amendment is a complete submission and is in substantial compliance with all of the following:
(A)The applicable requirements of this chapter.
(B)Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
(C)The lead agencys surface mining ordinance in effect at the time that the reclamation plan or plan amendment is submitted to the director for review.
(b)(1)The director shall have 15 days from the receipt of a reclamation plan or plan amendment to notify the lead agency and operator if the submission is incomplete. An incomplete submission is one that does not meet the content requirements of subdivisions (c) and (d) of section 2772 and subdivision (a). The directors notice shall specifically identify all aspects of the submission that are incomplete. If the submission is incomplete due to the failure to include a professionally stamped copy of a technical report, map, or diagram that is required to be prepared by a California-licensed professional pursuant to subdivision (c) of section 2772, the director shall request a stamped copy of the technical report, map, or diagram only, instead of a full resubmission of the reclamation plan or plan amendment. The review time required pursuant to paragraph (2) shall begin when the stamped copy of the technical report, map, or diagram is received by the director. The directors time to review the reclamation plan or plan amendment shall commence upon the receipt of a submission that contains the item or items identified in the directors notice to the lead agency.
(2)The director shall have 45 days from the receipt of a complete reclamation plan or plan amendment to prepare written comments if the director chooses. The lead agency shall review and evaluate written comments received from the director relating to the reclamation plan or plan amendment within a reasonable amount of time.
(3)(A)The lead agency shall prepare a written response to the directors comments received pursuant to paragraph (2) describing the disposition of the major issues raised by the comments. The lead agency shall submit its response to the director at least 30 days prior to the intended approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment. The lead agencys response shall include either of the following:
(i)A description of how the lead agency proposes to adopt the directors comments to the reclamation plan or plan amendment.
(ii)A detailed description of the reasons why the lead agency proposes not to adopt the directors comments.
(B)Copies of any written comments received and responses prepared by the lead agency pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be forwarded to the operator.
(4)(A)The lead agency shall give the director at least 30 days notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing at which the reclamation plan or plan amendment is scheduled to be approved by the lead agency.
(B)If no hearing is required by this chapter, the local ordinance, or other state law, the lead agency shall provide 30 days notice to the director that the lead agency intends to approve the reclamation plan or plan amendment.
(5)(A)Within 60 days following approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment, the lead agency shall provide the director its final response to the directors written comments and the final approved copies of those documents. During that time, the department retains all of its powers, duties, and authorities pursuant to this chapter.
(B)The lead agencys final response shall include an index showing permit conditions of approval and binding mitigation measures adopted or certified pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) that are necessary to meet the requirements of subdivision (c) of Section 2772 and Sections 2773 and 2773.3. Those conditions of approval and mitigation measures shall be included in an appendix to the reclamation plan or plan amendment and shall be considered part of the reclamation compliance requirements and subject to the annual inspection requirements. To the extent those conditions of approval and mitigation measures are not subject to separate lead agency or other state or federal agency bonding or performance requirements, those conditions and measures shall be subject to the financial assurances requirements of this article.
(6)No later than 60 days after the approval of the reclamation plan or plan amendment, the lead agency shall provide an official copy of the approved reclamation plan or plan amendment incorporating all approved modifications to the reclamation plan or plan amendment to the director.
(c)To the extent there is a conflict between the comments of a trustee agency or a responsible agency that are based on that agencys statutory or regulatory authority and the comments of other commenting agencies that are received by the lead agency pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) regarding a reclamation plan or plan amendments, the lead agency shall consider only the comments of the trustee agency or responsible agency.
(d)Nothing in this section is intended to limit or expand the departments authority or responsibility to review a document in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
SEC. 2.SEC. 8.Section 2773.1 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2773.1.(a)Lead agencies shall require financial assurances of each surface mining operation to ensure reclamation is performed in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan, as follows:
(1)Financial assurances A financial assurance mechanism may take the form of surety bonds executed by an admitted surety insurer, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 995.120 of the Code of Civil Procedure, irrevocable letters of credit, trust funds, or other forms of financial assurances specified by the board pursuant to subdivision (e) that the lead agency reasonably determines are adequate to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan.
(2)The financial assurances shall remain in effect for the duration of the surface mining operation and any additional period until reclamation is completed.
(3)The amount of financial assurances required of a surface mining operation for any one year shall be reviewed and, if necessary, adjusted once each calendar year to account for new lands disturbed by surface mining operations, inflation, and reclamation of lands accomplished in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. An operator shall be required to replace an approved financial assurance mechanism to bond for the reclamation of the surface mining operation only if the financial assurance cost estimate identifies a need to increase the amount of the financial assurance mechanism.
(4)Financial assurance cost estimates shall be submitted to the lead agency for review on the form adopted by the board by regulation pursuant to subdivision (f). The estimates shall include estimates of the time needed to complete reclamation of the mine in accordance with the approved reclamation plan, including, but not limited to, any monitoring studies required by the reclamation plan.
(5)The financial assurances Each financial assurance mechanism shall be made payable to the lead agency and the department. Financial assurances that were A financial assurance mechanism shall not be released without the consent of the lead agency and the department. A financial assurance mechanism that was approved by the lead agency prior to January 1, 1993, and were was made payable to the State Geologist shall be considered payable to the department for purposes of this chapter. However, if a surface mining operation has received approval of its financial assurances from a public agency other than the lead agency, the lead agency shall deem those financial assurances adequate for purposes of this section, or shall credit them toward fulfillment of the financial assurances required by this section, if they are made payable to the public agency, the lead agency, and the department and otherwise meet the requirements of this section. In any event, if a lead agency and one or more public agencies exercise jurisdiction over a surface mining operation, the total amount of financial assurances required by the lead agency and the public agencies for any one year shall not exceed that amount that is necessary to perform reclamation of lands remaining disturbed. For purposes of this paragraph, a public agency may include a federal agency.
(b)(1)If the lead agency, or the board when acting as a lead agency, has evidence that an operator may be financially incapable of completing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan or that the operator may have abandoned the surface mining operation without completing reclamation, the lead agency or board shall conduct a public hearing to determine whether the operator is financially capable of completing reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan or has abandoned the surface mining operation. The hearing shall be noticed to the operator and the director at least 30 days prior to the hearing.
(b)
(2)If the lead agency or the board, following a public hearing, the public hearing conducted pursuant to paragraph (1), determines that the operator is financially incapable of performing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan, plan or has abandoned its surface mining operation without commencing completing reclamation, either the lead agency or the director shall do all of the following:
(1)
(A)Notify the operator by personal service or certified mail that the lead agency or the director intends to take appropriate action to forfeit the financial assurances and specify the reasons for so doing.
(2)Allow the operator 60 days to commence or cause the commencement of reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan and require that reclamation be completed within the time limits specified in the approved reclamation plan or some other time period mutually agreed upon by the lead agency or the director and the operator.
(3)
(B)Proceed to take appropriate action to require forfeiture of the financial assurances if the operator does not substantially comply with paragraph (2). assurances.
(4)
(C)Use the proceeds from the forfeited financial assurances to conduct and complete reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. If the surface mining operation cannot be reclaimed in accordance with its approved reclamation plan, or the financial assurances are inadequate to reclaim in accordance with its approved reclamation plan, the lead agency or director may use seized financial assurances to reclaim or remediate mining disturbances as appropriate for the site conditions as determined by both the lead agency and the director. The financial assurances shall not be used for any other purpose. The operator is responsible for the costs of conducting and completing reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan or a remediation plan developed pursuant to this section as determined appropriate by both the lead agency and the director that are in excess of the proceeds from the forfeited financial assurances.
(c)Financial assurances shall no longer be required of a surface mining operation, and shall be released, upon the written notification by concurrence of the lead agency and the director, which shall be forwarded to the operator and the director, institutions providing or holding the financial assurance mechanism, that reclamation has been completed in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. If a surface mining operation is sold or ownership is transferred to another person, the existing financial assurances shall remain in force and shall not be released by the lead agency and the director until new financial assurances are secured from the new owner and have been approved by the lead agency in accordance with Section 2770. Sections 2770, 2773.1, and 2773.4. Within 90 days of the sale or transfer of the surface mining operation, the new operator shall establish or maintain an appropriate financial assurance mechanism and sign a new statement of reclamation responsibility in accordance with paragraph (10) of subdivision (c) of Section 2772.
(d)The lead agency shall have primary responsibility to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and to reclaim mine sites under pursuant to subdivision (b). However, in cases where if the board is not the lead agency pursuant to Section 2774.4, the director may act to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and reclaim mine sites pursuant to subdivision (b) only if both of the following occurs:
(1)The financial incapability of the operator or the abandonment of the surface mining operation has come to the attention of the director.
(2)The lead agency has been notified in writing by the director of the financial incapability of the operator or the abandonment of the surface mining operation for at least 15 days, the lead agency has not taken appropriate measures to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances and reclaim the mine site, and one of the following has occurred:
(A)The lead agency has been notified in writing by the director that failure to take appropriate measures to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances or to reclaim the mine site shall result in actions being taken against the lead agency under Section 2774.4.
(B)The director determines that there is a violation that amounts to an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health, safety, or to the environment.
(C)The lead agency notifies the director in writing that its good faith attempts to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances have not been successful.
The director shall comply with subdivision (b) in seeking forfeiture of financial assurances and reclaiming mine sites.
(e)The board may adopt regulations specifying financial assurance mechanisms other than surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, and trust funds, which the board determines are reasonably available and adequate to ensure reclamation pursuant to this chapter, but these mechanisms shall not include financial tests, tests or surety bonds executed by one or more personal sureties. These mechanisms may include reclamation bond pool programs.
(f)On or before March 1, 1993, the The board shall adopt or revise guidelines to implement this section as necessary. The guidelines are exempt from the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code), and are not subject to review by the Office of Administrative Law.
SEC. 9.Section 2773.4 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2773.4.(a)(1)Prior to approving the financial assurances for a new reclamation plan or adjustments to financial assurances based on an amendment to a reclamation plan, the lead agency shall submit the financial assurance cost estimate to the director for review.
(2)The lead agency shall provide the director with a preliminary determination of whether the financial assurance cost estimate submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) is adequate, complete, and consistent with Section 2773.1.
(3)All documentation submitted to the director pursuant to this subdivision shall be submitted at one time.
(b)No later than 15 days after receiving a financial assurance cost estimate, the director shall notify the lead agency and the operator if the submission is incomplete. An incomplete submission is one that does not meet the content requirements of Section 2773.1. The directors notice shall specifically identify all aspects of the submission that are incomplete. The directors time to review the financial assurance cost estimate shall commence upon the receipt of a submission that contains the aspects identified in the directors notice to the lead agency.
(c)(1)The director shall have 45 days from the date of receipt of a complete financial assurance cost estimate to prepare written comments if the director chooses.
(2)The lead agency shall evaluate written comments received from the director relating to the financial assurances within a reasonable amount of time. The lead agency shall prepare a written response to the directors comments describing the disposition of the major issues raised by the directors comments.
(3)The lead agency shall submit its proposed response to the director at least 30 days prior to approval of the financial assurance cost estimate. The lead agencys response shall include either of the following:
(A)A description of how the lead agency proposes to adopt the directors comments to the financial assurance cost estimate.
(B)A detailed description of the reasons why the lead agency proposes to reject the directors comments.
(4)Copies of any written comments received and responses prepared by the lead agency shall be forwarded to the operator.
(5)(A)The lead agency shall give the director at least 30 days notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing at which the financial assurance cost estimate is scheduled to be approved by the lead agency. If no hearing is required by this chapter, local ordinance, or other state law, then the lead agency shall provide 30 days notice to the director that it intends to approve the financial assurance cost estimate.
(B)The lead agency shall send to the director its final response to the directors comments within 30 days following its approval of the financial assurance cost estimate, during which time the department retains all of its powers, duties, and authority pursuant to this chapter.
(d)(1)Within 30 days of an annual inspection being conducted pursuant to Section 2774, an operator shall provide an annual financial assurance cost estimate to the lead agency for review.
(2)Within 60 days of receiving an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate, the lead agency shall do both of the following:
(A)Review the annual financial assurance cost estimate for adequacy and completeness consistent with Section 2773.1.
(B)Submit the annual financial assurance cost estimate to the director for review.
(3)All documentation submitted to the director pursuant to this subdivision shall be submitted at one time.
(4)The lead agency shall provide the director with a preliminary determination of whether the annual financial assurance cost estimate submitted pursuant to this subdivision is adequate, complete, and consistent with Section 2773.1.
(5)Within 15 days of receiving an annual financial assurance cost estimate, the director shall notify the lead agency and the operator if the submission is incomplete. An incomplete submission is one that does not meet the content requirements of Section 2773.1. The directors notice shall specifically identify all aspects of the submission that are incomplete. The directors time to review the annual financial assurance cost estimate shall commence upon the receipt of a submission that contains the aspects identified in the directors notice to the lead agency.
(6)(A)Within 45 days of receiving an operators complete annual financial assurance cost estimate from the lead agency, the director shall prepare written comments on the operators financial assurances and provide the comments to the lead agency and the operator, if the director so chooses.
(B)Within 30 days from receiving the directors written comments pursuant to this subdivision, the lead agency shall evaluate the written comments and provide the director and operator its proposed response to the director.
(C)Within 60 days of receiving the directors written comments, or the due date of the directors written comments if they are not received, the lead agency shall accept or reject an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate. In approving a financial assurance cost estimate, the lead agency, with the concurrence of the operator, may modify the financial assurance cost estimate as necessary to correct deficiencies identified by the director or lead agency.
(D)Within 30 days of the lead agencys acceptance of the annual financial assurance cost estimate, the lead agency shall send the director its final response to the directors comments.
(7)If the lead agency determines an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate is inadequate, the lead agency shall specify the reasons for that determination. The operator shall have 30 days to appeal that denial pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2770 or provide a revised financial assurance cost estimate incorporating the suggested changes to the director and the lead agency for approval by the lead agency.
(e)(1)Within 30 days of the lead agencys approval of a financial assurance cost estimate pursuant to this section, the operator shall provide the lead agency and the director an appropriate financial assurance mechanism. The operator shall provide this financial assurance mechanism even if the director has appealed the approval pursuant to subdivision (e) of section 2770.
(2)Within 15 days of receiving a financial assurance mechanism pursuant to this subdivision, the lead agency and the director shall review the financial assurance mechanism to determine if the type of mechanism, including the release instructions, meets the requirements of this chapter.
(3)A financial assurance mechanism utilizing any of the forms provided as Appendix D, Appendix E-1, Appendix E-2, Appendix E-3, and Appendix F to the guidelines adopted by the board pursuant to subdivision (f) of section 2773.1 shall be deemed to meet the requirements of this chapter. A financial assurance mechanism considered by the lead agency or the director to not meet the requirements of this chapter shall be returned to the operator with correction instructions as to the type and release language of the financial assurance mechanism.
SEC. 3.SEC. 10.Section 2774 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.(a)Every lead agency shall adopt ordinances in accordance with state policy that establish procedures for the review and approval of reclamation plans and financial assurances and the issuance of a permit to conduct surface mining operations, except that any lead agency without an active surface mining operation in its jurisdiction may defer adopting an implementing ordinance until the filing of a permit application. The ordinances shall establish procedures requiring at least one public hearing and shall be periodically reviewed by the lead agency and revised, as necessary, to ensure that the ordinances continue to be in accordance with state policy.
(b)Surface mining operations shall be inspected annually, solely to determine whether the surface mining operation is in compliance with its reclamation plan as described in subdivision (c) of Section 2772. The lead agency shall cause an inspection to be conducted by a state licensed geologist, state licensed civil engineer, state licensed landscape architect, state licensed forester, or a lead agency employee who is experienced in land reclamation and who has not been employed by the surface mining operation being inspected in any capacity during the previous 12 months, except that a lead agency employee may inspect surface mining operations conducted by another department within the local agency. All inspections shall be conducted using a form developed by the department and approved by the board that includes the professional licensing and disciplinary information of the person who conducted the inspection. The operator shall be solely responsible for the reasonable cost of the inspection. The lead agency shall provide a notice of completion of inspection to the director within 90 days of conducting the inspection. The notice shall contain a statement regarding the surface mining operations compliance with its approved reclamation plan, as described in subdivision (c) of Section 2772, a copy of the completed inspection form, and which aspects of the surface mining operations, if any, are inconsistent with its approved reclamation plan, as described in subdivision (c) of Section 2772, and any corrective measures recommended by the inspector. If the surface mining operation has a review of its reclamation plan, financial assurances, or an interim management plan pending under subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (h) of Section 2770, or an appeal pending before the board or lead agency governing body under subdivision (e) or (h) of Section 2770, the notice shall so indicate. The lead agency shall forward to the operator a copy of the notice, a copy of the completed inspection form, and any supporting documentation, including, but not limited to, any inspection report prepared by the geologist, civil engineer, landscape architect, forester, or lead agency employee who conducted the inspection.
(c)Before approving a surface mining operations reclamation plan or financial assurances, or any amendments to the reclamation plan and adjustments to financial assurances based on an amendment to a reclamation plan, the lead agency shall submit the plan, assurances, or amendments to the director for review. The plan or amendments shall be submitted to the director as early as practicable in order to facilitate review of the plan pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)). All documentation for that submission shall be submitted to the director at one time. When the lead agency submits a reclamation plan or plan amendments to the director for review, the lead agency shall also submit to the director, for use in reviewing the reclamation plan or plan amendments, information from any prior final related document prepared, adopted, or certified pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)), and shall submit any other pertinent information. The lead agency shall certify to the director that the reclamation plan is considered complete and in substantial compliance with the applicable requirements of this chapter and Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations and the lead agencys mining ordinance in effect at the time that the reclamation plan is submitted to the director for review.
(d)(1)The director shall have 30 days from the date of receipt of a reclamation plan or plan amendments submitted pursuant to subdivision (c), and 45 days from the date of receipt of financial assurances submitted pursuant to subdivision (c), to prepare written comments, if the director so chooses. The lead agency shall evaluate written comments received from the director relating to the reclamation plan, plan amendments, or financial assurances within a reasonable amount of time.
(2)The lead agency shall prepare a written response to the directors comments describing the disposition of the major issues raised by the directors comments, and submit the lead agencys proposed response to the director at least 30 days prior to approval of the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance. The lead agencys response to the directors comments shall describe whether the lead agency proposes to adopt the directors comments to the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance. If the lead agency does not propose to adopt the directors comments, the lead agency shall specify, in detail, why the lead agency proposes not to adopt the comments. Copies of any written comments received and responses prepared by the lead agency shall be forwarded to the operator. The lead agency shall also give the director at least 30 days notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing before the lead agency at which time the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance is scheduled to be approved by the lead agency. If no hearing is required by this chapter, or by the local ordinance, or other state law, then the lead agency shall provide 30 days notice to the director that it intends to approve the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance. The lead agency shall send to the director its final response to the directors comments within 30 days following its approval of the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance, along with final approved copies of those documents, during which period the department retains all powers, duties, and authorities of this chapter.
(3)To the extent there is a conflict between the comments of a trustee agency or a responsible agency that are based on the agencys statutory or regulatory authority and the comments of other commenting agencies that are received by the lead agency pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) regarding a reclamation plan or plan amendments, the lead agency shall consider only the comments of the trustee agency or responsible agency.
(e)(1)
(c)If an operator does not request an inspection date on the annual report filed pursuant to Section 2207, 2207 or if the lead agency is unable to cause the inspection of a given surface mining operation on the date requested by the operator, the lead agency shall provide the operator with a minimum of five days written notice of a pending inspection or a lesser time period if agreed to by the operator.
(2)Within 30 days of an annual inspection being conducted pursuant to this section, each operator shall provide an annual financial assurance cost estimate, on the form developed by the board by regulation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1, to the director and the lead agency for review.
(3)(A)Within 60 days of the receipt of an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate, the lead agency shall do both of the following:
(i)Review the annual financial assurance cost estimate for adequacy and completeness consistent with Section 2773.1.
(ii)Submit the annual financial assurance cost estimate to the director for review.
(B)All documentation submitted to the director pursuant to this paragraph shall be submitted at one time.
(C)The lead agency shall provide the director with a preliminary determination of whether the annual financial assurance cost estimate submitted pursuant to this paragraph is adequate and complete consistent with Section 2773.1.
(4)The director shall have 45 days from the date of receipt of the operators annual financial assurance cost estimate from the lead agency to prepare written comments on the operators financial assurances and provide the comments to the lead agency and the operator. The lead agency shall have 30 days from receipt of the directors comments to evaluate the written comments received from the director and provide the director and operator its proposed response to the director. The lead agency shall accept or reject a surface mining operations annual financial assurance cost estimate within 60 days of receipt of the directors comments or the due date of the directors comments if comments are not received. The lead agency shall send to the director its final response to the directors comments within 30 days of its acceptance of the annual financial assurance cost estimate.
(5)If the lead agency determines an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate is inadequate, the lead agency shall specify the reasons for that determination. The operator shall have 30 days to appeal that denial pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2770 or provide a revised financial assurance cost estimate incorporating the suggested changes to the director and the lead agency for approval by the lead agency.
(6)The operator shall provide the director and the lead agency with a revised financial assurances mechanism within 60 days of the lead agencys approval. An operator shall be required to replace an approved financial assurance mechanism to bond for the reclamation of the surface mining operation only if the financial assurance cost estimate identifies a need to increase the amount of the financial assurance mechanism.
(f)
(d)(1)No later than April 1 of each year, the director shall provide each lead agency with a notice listing each active or idle surface mining operation within the lead agencys jurisdiction. For each surface mining operation, the director shall request and the lead agency shall provide to the director, on a form provided by the director, no later than July 1 of each year, year the following information:
(A)A copy of any permit or reclamation plan amendments, as applicable.
(B)A statement that there have been no changes during the previous year, as applicable.
(C)The date of each surface mining operations last inspection.
(D)The date of each surface mining operations last financial assurance review pursuant to Section 2773.1 for each operation listed.
(2)The director shall request similar information on any new or omitted operations, to be provided to the director no later than July 1 of each year.
(g)The review and approval of financial assurances pursuant to this section shall not be considered a project for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
(h)
(e)(1)After January 1, 2018, a lead agency employee who is not a state-licensed geologist, state-licensed civil engineer, state-licensed landscape architect, or a state-license forester and who inspects surface mining operations under this chapter shall have completed an inspection workshop or an update workshop provided by the director. The director shall provide an adequate transition time period for lead agency inspectors to complete the update workshop if it becomes necessary.
(2)Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to affect or impose qualifications or standards on employees designated by a local, state, or federal agency to perform inspections of real property under separate provisions of local, state, or federal law, including, but not limited to, the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code), the federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.), and the Fish and Game Code, notwithstanding the fact that that informational addenda are submitted to lead agencies pursuant to this chapter in addition to reclamation plans, including materials submitted pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 2772.
SEC. 4.SEC. 11.Section 2774.2 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.2.(a)Within 30 days of the issuance of an order setting administrative penalties under subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1, the operator may petition that legislative body of the lead agency, if the lead agency has issued the order, or the board for orders issued by the director, for review of the order. If the operator does not petition for review within the time limits set by this subdivision, the order setting administrative penalties shall not be subject to review by any court or agency.
(b)The legislative body of the lead agency or the board shall notify the operator by personal service or certified mail whether it will review the order setting administrative penalties. In reviewing an order pursuant to this section, the record shall consist of the record before the lead agency or the director and any other relevant evidence which, in the judgment of the legislative body or the board, should be considered to effectuate and implement the policies of this chapter.
(c)The legislative body or the board may affirm, modify, or set aside, in whole or in part, by its own order an order of the lead agency or the director setting administrative penalties reviewed by the legislative body or the board pursuant to this section.
(d)An order of the legislative body or the board issued under subdivision (c) shall become effective upon its issuance unless the operator petitions the superior court for review as provided in subdivision (e). An order shall be served by personal service or by certified mail upon the operator. Payment of an administrative penalty that is specified in an order issued pursuant to subdivision (c) shall be made to the lead agency or the director within 30 days of service of the order. However, the payment shall be held in an interest bearing impound account pending the resolution of a petition for review filed pursuant to subdivision (e).
(e)An operator aggrieved by an order of the legislative body or the board issued pursuant to subdivision (c) may obtain review of the order by filing in the superior court a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days following the issuance of the order. An operator aggrieved by an order of a lead agency or the director setting administrative penalties pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1, for which the legislative body or board denies review, may obtain review of the order in the superior court by filing in the court a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days following the denial of review. The provisions of Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall govern judicial proceedings pursuant to this subdivision, except that in every case the court shall exercise its independent judgment. If the operator does not petition for a writ of mandate within the time limits set by this subdivision, an order of the board or the legislative body shall not be subject to review by any court or agency.
(f)(1)After the expiration of the time to petition for review pursuant to subdivision (a) or (e), the director or the board acting as the lead agency may apply to the small claims court or the superior court, depending on the jurisdictional amount, in the county where the administrative penalty was imposed for a judgment to collect the unpaid administrative penalty imposed pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1. The application shall include all of the following:
(A)The order setting the administrative penalty pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1.
(B)A notice to the operator of the right to petition for review of the order.
(C)Either of the following:
(i)A declaration from the board that no petition was made or that the board declined to review the petition.
(ii)A copy of the final order of the board.
(2)An application submitted pursuant to this subdivision shall constitute a sufficient showing to warrant the issuance of the judgment. The court clerk shall enter the judgment immediately in conformity with the application.
(3)The judgment entered pursuant to this subdivision shall have the same force and effect as, and shall be subject to all the provisions of law relating to, a judgment in a civil action and may be enforced in the same manner as any other judgment of the court. The court shall make enforcement of the judgment a priority.
SEC. 5.SEC. 12.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
(a)The owner or the operator of a mining operation within the state shall forward to the director annually, not later than a date established by the director, upon forms approved by the board from time to time, a report that identifies and contains all of the following:
(1)The name, address, and telephone number of the person, company, or other owner of the mining operation.
(2)The name, address, and telephone number of a designated agent who resides in this state, and who will receive and accept service of all orders, notices, and processes of the lead agency, board, director, or court.
(3)The location of the mining operation, its name, its mine number as issued by the Office of Mine Reclamation or the director, its section, township, range, latitude, longitude, and approximate boundaries of the mining operation marked on a United States Geological Survey 71/2-minute or 15-minute quadrangle map.
(4)The lead agency.
(5)The approval date of the mining operations reclamation plan.
(6)The mining operations status as active, idle, reclaimed, or in the process of being reclaimed.
(7)The commodities produced by the mine and the type of mining operation.
(8)A copy of the previously completed annual inspection form and a requested date for the next annual inspection by the lead agency.
(9)Proof of financial assurances.
(10)Ownership of the property, including government agencies, if applicable, by the assessors parcel number, and total assessed value of the mining operation.
(11)The approximate permitted size of the mining operation subject to Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), in acres.
(12)The approximate total acreage of land newly disturbed by the mining operation during the previous calendar year.
(13)The approximate total of disturbed acreage reclaimed during the previous calendar year.
(14)The approximate total unreclaimed disturbed acreage remaining as of the end of the calendar year.
(15)The total production for each mineral commodity produced during the previous year.
(16)A copy of any approved reclamation plan and any amendments or conditions of approval to any existing reclamation plan approved by the lead agency.
(b)(1)Every year, not later than the date established by the director, the person submitting the report pursuant to subdivision (a) shall forward to the lead agency, upon forms furnished by the board, a report that provides all of the information specified in subdivision (a).
(2)The owner or operator of a mining operation shall allow access to the property to any governmental agency or the agent of any company providing financial assurances in connection with the reclamation plan in order that the reclamation can be carried out by the entity or company, in accordance with the provisions of the reclamation plan.
(c)Subsequent reports shall include only changes in the information submitted for the items described in subdivision (a), except that, instead of the approved reclamation plan, the reports shall include any reclamation plan amendments approved during the previous year. The reports shall state whether review of a reclamation plan, financial assurances, or an interim management plan is pending under subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (h) of Section 2770, or whether an appeal before the board or lead agency governing body is pending under subdivision (e) or (h) of Section 2770. The director shall notify the person submitting the report and the owners designated agent in writing that the report and the fee required pursuant to subdivision (d) have been received, specify the mining operations mine number if one has not been issued by the Office of Mine Reclamation, and notify the person and agent of any deficiencies in the report within 90 days of receipt. That person or agent shall have 30 days from receipt of the notification to correct the noted deficiencies and forward the revised report to the director and the lead agency. Any person who fails to comply with this section, or knowingly provides incorrect or false information in reports required by this section, may be subject to an administrative penalty as provided in subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1.
(d)(1)The board shall impose, by regulation, pursuant to paragraph (2), an annual reporting fee on, and method for collecting annual fees from, each active or idle mining operation. The maximum fee for any single mining operation may not exceed four thousand dollars ($4,000) annually and may not be less than one hundred dollars ($100) annually, as adjusted for the cost of living as measured by the California Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers, calendar year averages, using the percentage change in the previous year, beginning with the 200506 fiscal year and annually thereafter.
(2)(A)The board shall adopt, by regulation, a schedule of fees authorized under paragraph (1) to cover the departments cost in carrying out this section and Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), as reflected in the Governors proposed Budget, and may adopt those regulations as emergency regulations. In establishing the schedule of fees to be paid by each active and idle mining operation, the fees shall be calculated on an equitable basis reflecting the size and type of operation. The board shall also consider the total assessed value of the mining operation, the acreage disturbed by mining activities, and the acreage subject to the reclamation plan.
(B)Regulations adopted pursuant to this subdivision shall be adopted by the board in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code). The adoption of any emergency regulations pursuant to this subdivision shall be considered necessary to address an emergency and shall be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, and general welfare.
(3)The total revenue generated by the reporting fees may not exceed, and may be less than, the amount of three million five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000), as adjusted for the cost of living as measured by the California Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers, calendar year averages, using the percentage change in the previous year, beginning with the 200506 fiscal year and annually thereafter. If the director determines that the revenue collected during the preceding fiscal year was greater or less than the cost to operate the program, the board shall adjust the fees to compensate for the overcollection or undercollection of revenues.
(4)(A)The reporting fees established pursuant to this subdivision shall be deposited in the Mine Reclamation Account, which is hereby created. Any fees, penalties, interest, fines, or charges collected by the director or board pursuant to this chapter or Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710) shall be deposited in the Mine Reclamation Account. The money in the account shall be available to the department and board, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purpose of carrying out this section and complying with Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), which includes, but is not limited to, classification and designation of areas with mineral resources of statewide or regional significance, reclamation plan and financial assurance review, mine inspection, and enforcement.
(B)(i)In addition to reporting fees, the board shall collect five dollars ($5) per ounce of gold and ten cents ($0.10) per ounce of silver mined within the state and shall deposit the fees collected in the Abandoned Mine Reclamation and Minerals Fund Subaccount, which is hereby created in the Mine Reclamation Account. The department may expend the moneys in the subaccount, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for only the purposes of Section 2796.5 and as authorized herein for the remediation of abandoned mines.
(ii)Notwithstanding subdivision (j) of Section 2796.5, fees collected pursuant to clause (i) may also be used to remediate features of historic abandoned mines and lands that they impact. For the purposes of this section, historic abandoned mines are mines for which operations have been conducted before January 1, 1976, and include, but are not limited to, historic gold and silver mines.
(5)In case of late payment of the reporting fee, a penalty of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) or 10 percent of the amount due, whichever is greater, plus interest at the rate of 11/2 percent per month, computed from the delinquent date of the assessment until and including the date of payment, shall be assessed. New mining operations that have not submitted a report shall submit a report prior to commencement of operations. The new operation shall submit its fee according to the reasonable fee schedule adopted by the board, and the month that the report is received shall become that operations anniversary month.
(e)The lead agency, or the board when acting as the lead agency, may impose a fee upon each mining operation to cover the reasonable costs incurred in implementing this chapter and Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710).
(f)For purposes of this section, mining operation means a mining operation of any kind or character whatever in this state, including, but not limited to, a mining operation that is classified as a surface mining operation as defined in Section 2735, unless excepted by Section 2714. For the purposes of fee collections only, mining operation may include one or more mines operated by a single operator or mining company on one or more sites, if the total annual combined mineral production for all sites is less than 100 troy ounces for precious metals, if precious metals are the primary mineral commodity produced, or less than 100,000 short tons if the primary mineral commodity produced is not precious metals.
(g)Any information in reports submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) that includes or otherwise indicates the total mineral production, reserves, or rate of depletion of any mining operation may not be disclosed to any member of the public, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 6252 of the Government Code. Other portions of the reports are public records unless excepted by statute. Statistical bulletins based on these reports and published under Section 2205 shall be compiled to show, for the state as a whole and separately for each lead agency, the total of each mineral produced therein. In order not to disclose the production, reserves, or rate of depletion from any identifiable mining operation, no production figure shall be published or otherwise disclosed unless that figure is the aggregated production of not less than three mining operations. If the production figure for any lead agency would disclose the production, reserves, or rate of depletion of less than three mining operations or otherwise permit the reasonable inference of the production, reserves, or rate of depletion of any identifiable mining operation, that figure shall be combined with the same figure of not less than two other lead agencies without regard to the location of the lead agencies. The bulletin shall be published annually by June 30 or as soon thereafter as practicable.
(h)The approval of a form by the board pursuant to this section is not the adoption of a regulation for purposes of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code) and is not subject to that act.
SEC. 2.Section 2773.1 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2773.1.(a)Lead agencies shall require financial assurances of each surface mining operation to ensure reclamation is performed in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan, as follows:
(1)Financial assurances may take the form of surety bonds executed by an admitted surety insurer, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 995.120 of the Code of Civil Procedure, irrevocable letters of credit, trust funds, or other forms of financial assurances specified by the board pursuant to subdivision (e) that the lead agency reasonably determines are adequate to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan.
(2)The financial assurances shall remain in effect for the duration of the surface mining operation and any additional period until reclamation is completed.
(3)The amount of financial assurances required of a surface mining operation for any one year shall be reviewed and, if necessary, adjusted once each calendar year to account for new lands disturbed by surface mining operations, inflation, and reclamation of lands accomplished in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. An operator shall be required to replace an approved financial assurance mechanism to bond for the reclamation of the surface mining operation only if the financial assurance cost estimate identifies a need to increase the amount of the financial assurance mechanism.
(4)Financial assurance cost estimates shall be submitted to the lead agency for review on the form adopted by the board by regulation pursuant to subdivision (f). The estimates shall include estimates of the time needed to complete reclamation of the mine in accordance with the approved reclamation plan, including, but not limited to, any monitoring studies required by the reclamation plan.
(5)The financial assurances shall be made payable to the lead agency and the department. Financial assurances that were approved by the lead agency prior to January 1, 1993, and were made payable to the State Geologist shall be considered payable to the department for purposes of this chapter. However, if a surface mining operation has received approval of its financial assurances from a public agency other than the lead agency, the lead agency shall deem those financial assurances adequate for purposes of this section, or shall credit them toward fulfillment of the financial assurances required by this section, if they are made payable to the public agency, the lead agency, and the department and otherwise meet the requirements of this section. In any event, if a lead agency and one or more public agencies exercise jurisdiction over a surface mining operation, the total amount of financial assurances required by the lead agency and the public agencies for any one year shall not exceed that amount that is necessary to perform reclamation of lands remaining disturbed. For purposes of this paragraph, a public agency may include a federal agency.
(b)If the lead agency or the board, following a public hearing, determines that the operator is financially incapable of performing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan, or has abandoned its surface mining operation without commencing reclamation, either the lead agency or the director shall do all of the following:
(1)Notify the operator by personal service or certified mail that the lead agency or the director intends to take appropriate action to forfeit the financial assurances and specify the reasons for so doing.
(2)Allow the operator 60 days to commence or cause the commencement of reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan and require that reclamation be completed within the time limits specified in the approved reclamation plan or some other time period mutually agreed upon by the lead agency or the director and the operator.
(3)Proceed to take appropriate action to require forfeiture of the financial assurances if the operator does not substantially comply with paragraph (2).
(4)Use the proceeds from the forfeited financial assurances to conduct and complete reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. The financial assurances shall not be used for any other purpose. The operator is responsible for the costs of conducting and completing reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan that are in excess of the proceeds from the forfeited financial assurances.
(c)Financial assurances shall no longer be required of a surface mining operation, and shall be released, upon written notification by the lead agency, which shall be forwarded to the operator and the director, that reclamation has been completed in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. If a mining operation is sold or ownership is transferred to another person, the existing financial assurances shall remain in force and shall not be released by the lead agency until new financial assurances are secured from the new owner and have been approved by the lead agency in accordance with Section 2770.
(d)The lead agency shall have primary responsibility to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and to reclaim mine sites under subdivision (b). However, in cases where the board is not the lead agency pursuant to Section 2774.4, the director may act to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and reclaim mine sites pursuant to subdivision (b) only if both of the following occurs:
(1)The financial incapability of the operator or the abandonment of the mining operation has come to the attention of the director.
(2)The lead agency has been notified in writing by the director of the financial incapability of the operator or the abandonment of the mining operation for at least 15 days, the lead agency has not taken appropriate measures to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances and reclaim the mine site, and one of the following has occurred:
(A)The lead agency has been notified in writing by the director that failure to take appropriate measures to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances or to reclaim the mine site shall result in actions being taken against the lead agency under Section 2774.4.
(B)The director determines that there is a violation that amounts to an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health, safety, or to the environment.
(C)The lead agency notifies the director in writing that its good faith attempts to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances have not been successful.
The director shall comply with subdivision (b) in seeking forfeiture of financial assurances and reclaiming mine sites.
(e)The board may adopt regulations specifying financial assurance mechanisms other than surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, and trust funds, which the board determines are reasonably available and adequate to ensure reclamation pursuant to this chapter, but these mechanisms shall not include financial tests, or surety bonds executed by one or more personal sureties. These mechanisms may include reclamation bond pool programs.
(f)On or before March 1, 1993, the board shall adopt guidelines to implement this section. The guidelines are exempt from the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code), and are not subject to review by the Office of Administrative Law.
SEC. 3.Section 2774 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.(a)Every lead agency shall adopt ordinances in accordance with state policy that establish procedures for the review and approval of reclamation plans and financial assurances and the issuance of a permit to conduct surface mining operations, except that any lead agency without an active surface mining operation in its jurisdiction may defer adopting an implementing ordinance until the filing of a permit application. The ordinances shall establish procedures requiring at least one public hearing and shall be periodically reviewed by the lead agency and revised, as necessary, to ensure that the ordinances continue to be in accordance with state policy.
(b)Surface mining operations shall be inspected annually, solely to determine whether the surface mining operation is in compliance with its reclamation plan as described in subdivision (c) of Section 2772. The lead agency shall cause an inspection to be conducted by a state licensed geologist, state licensed civil engineer, state licensed landscape architect, state licensed forester, or a lead agency employee who is a mine inspector qualified pursuant to subdivision (h), who is experienced in land reclamation and who has not been employed by the surface mining operation being inspected in any capacity during the previous 12 months, except that a lead agency employee who is a qualified mine inspector may inspect surface mining operations conducted by another department within the local agency. All inspections shall be conducted using a form developed by the department and approved by the board that includes the professional licensing and disciplinary information of the person who conducted the inspection. The operator shall be solely responsible for the reasonable cost of the inspection. The lead agency or the inspector qualified pursuant to subdivision (h), shall provide a notice of completion of inspection to the director within 90 days of conducting the inspection. The notice shall contain a statement regarding the surface mining operations compliance with its approved reclamation plan, as described in subdivision (c) of Section 2772, a copy of the completed inspection form, and which aspects of the surface mining operations, if any, are inconsistent with its approved reclamation plan, as described in subdivision (c) of Section 2772, and any corrective measures recommended by the inspector. If the surface mining operation has a review of its reclamation plan, financial assurances, or an interim management plan pending under subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (h) of Section 2770, or an appeal pending before the board or lead agency governing body under subdivision (e) or (h) of Section 2770, the notice shall so indicate. The lead agency shall forward to the operator a copy of the notice, a copy of the completed inspection form, and any supporting documentation, including, but not limited to, any inspection report prepared by the geologist, civil engineer, landscape architect, forester, or mine inspector qualified pursuant to subdivision (h) lead agency employee who conducted the inspection.
(c)Before approving a surface mining operations reclamation plan or financial assurances, or any amendments to the reclamation plan and adjustments to financial assurances based on an amendment to a reclamation plan, the lead agency shall submit the plan, assurances, or amendments to the director for review. The plan or amendments shall be submitted to the director as early as practicable in order to facilitate review of the plan pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)). All documentation for that submission shall be submitted to the director at one time. When the lead agency submits a reclamation plan or plan amendments to the director for review, the lead agency shall also submit to the director, for use in reviewing the reclamation plan or plan amendments, information from any prior final related document prepared, adopted, or certified pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)), and shall submit any other pertinent information. The lead agency shall certify to the director that the reclamation plan is considered complete and in substantial compliance with the applicable requirements of this chapter and Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations and the lead agencys mining ordinance in effect at the time that the reclamation plan is submitted to the director for review.
(d)(1)The director shall have 30 days from the date of receipt of a reclamation plan or plan amendments submitted pursuant to subdivision (c), and 45 days from the date of receipt of financial assurances submitted pursuant to subdivision (c), to prepare written comments, if the director so chooses. The lead agency shall evaluate written comments received from the director relating to the reclamation plan, plan amendments, or financial assurances within a reasonable amount of time.
(2)The lead agency shall prepare a written response to the directors comments describing the disposition of the major issues raised by the directors comments, and submit the lead agencys proposed response to the director at least 30 days prior to approval of the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance. The lead agencys response to the directors comments shall describe whether the lead agency proposes to adopt the directors comments to the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance. If the lead agency does not propose to adopt the directors comments, the lead agency shall specify, in detail, why the lead agency proposes not to adopt the comments. Copies of any written comments received and responses prepared by the lead agency shall be forwarded to the operator. The lead agency shall also give the director at least 30 days notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing before the lead agency at which time the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance is scheduled to be approved by the lead agency. If no hearing is required by this chapter, or by the local ordinance, or other state law, then the lead agency shall provide 30 days notice to the director that it intends to approve the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance. The lead agency shall send to the director its final response to the directors comments within 30 days following its approval of the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance, along with final approved copies of those documents, during which period the department retains all powers, duties, and authorities of this chapter.
(3)To the extent there is a conflict between the comments of a trustee agency or a responsible agency that are based on the agencys statutory or regulatory authority and the comments of other commenting agencies that are received by the lead agency pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) regarding a reclamation plan or plan amendments, the lead agency shall consider only the comments of the trustee agency or responsible agency.
(e)(1)If an operator does not request an inspection date on the annual report filed pursuant to Section 2207, or if the lead agency is unable to cause the inspection of a given surface mining operation on the date requested by the operator, the lead agency shall provide the operator with a minimum of five days written notice of a pending inspection or a lesser time period if agreed to by the operator.
(2)Within 30 days of an annual inspection being conducted pursuant to this section, each operator shall provide an annual financial assurance cost estimate, on the form developed by the board by regulation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1, to the director and the lead agency for review.
(3)(A)Within 60 days of the receipt of an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate, the lead agency shall do both of the following:
(i)Review the annual financial assurance cost estimate for adequacy and completeness consistent with Section 2773.1.
(ii)Submit the annual financial assurance cost estimate to the director for review.
(B)All documentation submitted to the director pursuant to this paragraph shall be submitted at one time.
(C)The lead agency shall provide the director with a preliminary determination of whether the annual financial assurance cost estimate submitted pursuant to this paragraph is adequate and complete consistent with Section 2773.1.
(3)
(4)The director shall have 45 days from the date of receipt of the operators annual financial assurance cost estimate from the lead agency to prepare written comments on the operators financial assurances and provide the comments to the lead agency and the operator. The lead agency shall have 30 days from receipt of the directors comments to evaluate the written comments received from the director and provide the director and operator its proposed response to the director. The lead agency shall accept or reject a surface mining operations annual financial assurance cost estimate within 60 days of receipt of the directors comments or the due date of the directors comments if comments are not received. The lead agency shall send to the director its final response to the directors comments within 30 days of its acceptance of the annual financial assurance cost estimate.
(4)
(5)If the lead agency determines an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate is inadequate, the lead agency shall specify the reasons for that determination. The operator shall have 30 days to appeal that denial pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2770 or provide a revised financial assurance cost estimate incorporating the suggested changes to the director and the lead agency for approval by the lead agency.
(5)
(6)The operator shall provide the director and the lead agency with a revised financial assurances mechanism within 60 days of the lead agencys approval. An operator shall be required to replace an approved financial assurance mechanism to bond for the reclamation of the surface mining operation only if the financial assurance cost estimate identifies a need to increase the amount of the financial assurance mechanism.
(f)(1)No later than April 1 of each year, the director shall provide each lead agency with a notice listing each active or idle surface mining operation within the lead agencys jurisdiction. For each surface mining operation, the director shall request and the lead agency shall provide to the director, on a form provided by the director, no later than July 1 of each year, the following information:
(A)A copy of any permit or reclamation plan amendments, as applicable.
(B)A statement that there have been no changes during the previous year, as applicable.
(C)The date of each surface mining operations last inspection.
(D)The date of each surface mining operations last financial assurance review pursuant to Section 2773.1 for each operation listed.
(2)The director shall request similar information on any new or omitted operations, to be provided to the director no later than July 1 of each year.
(3)The form provided by the director shall include the departments current information for each operation. The notice to each lead agency shall include a statement that failure to file with the director the information requested pursuant to this subdivision may be cause for action pursuant to Section 2774.4.
(g)The review and approval of financial assurances pursuant to this section shall not be considered a project for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
(h)(1)The State Geologist shall coordinate with the director, board, lead agencies, and interested parties to develop a curriculum for the training of mine inspectors. The curriculum shall include, but need not be limited to, all of the following:
(A)Training on determining revegetative success.
(B)Evaluating slopes for signs of instability.
(C)How to properly use the inspection form approved by the board.
(D)The calculation of financial assurances.
(E)Considerations for corrective measures.
(F)Other issues necessary to ensure the consistent inspection of surface mines under this chapter.
(2)Lead agency employees who inspect
(h)(1)After January 1, 2018, a lead agency employee who is not a state-licensed geologist, state-licensed civil engineer, state-licensed landscape architect, or a state-license forester and who inspects surface mining operations under this chapter shall be deemed qualified mine inspectors for up to two years after the State Geologist has finalized the curriculum pursuant to paragraph (1) and the training has been available to lead agency employees. have completed an inspection workshop or an update workshop provided by the director. The director shall provide an adequate transition time period for lead agency inspectors to complete the update workshop if it becomes necessary.
(3)A lead agency employee who has completed the training curriculum developed pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be a qualified mine inspector.
(4)
(2)Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to affect or impose qualifications or standards on employees designated by a local, state, or federal agency to perform inspections of real property under separate provisions of local, state, or federal law, including, but not limited to, the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code), the federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.), and the Fish and Game Code, notwithstanding the fact that that informational addenda are submitted to lead agencies pursuant to this chapter in addition to reclamation plans, including materials submitted pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 2772.
SEC. 4.Section 2774.2 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.2.(a)Within 30 days of the issuance of an order setting administrative penalties under subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1, the operator may petition that legislative body of the lead agency, if the lead agency has issued the order, or the board for orders issued by the director, for review of the order. If the operator does not petition for review within the time limits set by this subdivision, the order setting administrative penalties shall not be subject to review by any court or agency.
(b)The legislative body of the lead agency or the board shall notify the operator by personal service or certified mail whether it will review the order setting administrative penalties. In reviewing an order pursuant to this section, the record shall consist of the record before the lead agency or the director and any other relevant evidence which, in the judgment of the legislative body or the board, should be considered to effectuate and implement the policies of this chapter.
(c)The legislative body or the board may affirm, modify, or set aside, in whole or in part, by its own order an order of the lead agency or the director setting administrative penalties reviewed by the legislative body or the board pursuant to this section.
(d)An order of the legislative body or the board issued under subdivision (c) shall become effective upon its issuance unless the operator petitions the superior court for review as provided in subdivision (e). An order shall be served by personal service or by certified mail upon the operator. Payment of an administrative penalty that is specified in an order issued pursuant to subdivision (c) shall be made to the lead agency or the director within 30 days of service of the order. However, the payment shall be held in an interest bearing impound account pending the resolution of a petition for review filed pursuant to subdivision (e).
(e)An operator aggrieved by an order of the legislative body or the board issued pursuant to subdivision (c) may obtain review of the order by filing in the superior court a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days following the issuance of the order. An operator aggrieved by an order of a lead agency or the director setting administrative penalties pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1, for which the legislative body or board denies review, may obtain review of the order in the superior court by filing in the court a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days following the denial of review. The provisions of Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall govern judicial proceedings pursuant to this subdivision, except that in every case the court shall exercise its independent judgment. If the operator does not petition for a writ of mandate within the time limits set by this subdivision, an order of the board or the legislative body shall not be subject to review by any court or agency.
(f)(1)After the expiration of the time to petition for review pursuant to subdivision (a) or (e), the director or the board acting as the lead agency may apply to the small claims court or the superior court, depending on the jurisdictional amount, in the county where the administrative penalty was imposed for a judgment to collect the unpaid administrative penalty imposed pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1. The application shall include all of the following:
(A)The order setting the administrative penalty pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1.
(B)A notice to the operator of the right to petition for review of the order.
(C)Either of the following:
(i)A declaration from the board that no petition was made or that the board declined to review the petition.
(ii)A copy of the final order of the board.
(2)An application submitted pursuant to this subdivision shall constitute a sufficient showing to warrant the issuance of the judgment. The court clerk shall enter the judgment immediately in conformity with the application.
(3)The judgment entered pursuant to this subdivision shall have the same force and effect as, and shall be subject to all the provisions of law relating to, a judgment in a civil action and may be enforced in the same manner as any other judgment of the court. The court shall make enforcement of the judgment a priority.
SEC. 5.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
(a)The owner or the operator of a mining operation within the state shall forward to the director annually, not later than a date established by the director, upon forms approved by the board from time to time, a report that identifies and contains all of the following:
(1)The name, address, and telephone number of the person, company, or other owner of the mining operation.
(2)The name, address, and telephone number of a designated agent who resides in this state, and who will receive and accept service of all orders, notices, and processes of the lead agency, board, director, or court.
(3)The location of the mining operation, its name, its mine number as issued by the Office of Mine Reclamation or the director, its section, township, range, latitude, longitude, and approximate boundaries of the mining operation marked on a United States Geological Survey 71/2-minute or 15-minute quadrangle map.
(4)The lead agency.
(5)The approval date of the mining operations reclamation plan.
(6)The mining operations status as active, idle, reclaimed, or in the process of being reclaimed.
(7)The commodities produced by the mine and the type of mining operation.
(8)A copy of the previously completed annual inspection form and a requested date for the next annual inspection by the lead agency.
(9)Proof of financial assurances.
(10)Ownership of the property, including government agencies, if applicable, by the assessors parcel number, and total assessed value of the mining operation.
(11)The approximate permitted size of the mining operation subject to Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), in acres.
(12)The approximate total acreage of land newly disturbed by the mining operation during the previous calendar year.
(13)The approximate total of disturbed acreage reclaimed during the previous calendar year.
(14)The approximate total unreclaimed disturbed acreage remaining as of the end of the calendar year.
(15)The total production for each mineral commodity produced during the previous year.
(16)A copy of any approved reclamation plan and any amendments or conditions of approval to any existing reclamation plan approved by the lead agency.
(b)(1)Every year, not later than the date established by the director, the person submitting the report pursuant to subdivision (a) shall forward to the lead agency, upon forms furnished by the board, a report that provides all of the information specified in subdivision (a).
(2)The owner or operator of a mining operation shall allow access to the property to any governmental agency or the agent of any company providing financial assurances in connection with the reclamation plan in order that the reclamation can be carried out by the entity or company, in accordance with the provisions of the reclamation plan.
(c)Subsequent reports shall include only changes in the information submitted for the items described in subdivision (a), except that, instead of the approved reclamation plan, the reports shall include any reclamation plan amendments approved during the previous year. The reports shall state whether review of a reclamation plan, financial assurances, or an interim management plan is pending under subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (h) of Section 2770, or whether an appeal before the board or lead agency governing body is pending under subdivision (e) or (h) of Section 2770. The director shall notify the person submitting the report and the owners designated agent in writing that the report and the fee required pursuant to subdivision (d) have been received, specify the mining operations mine number if one has not been issued by the Office of Mine Reclamation, and notify the person and agent of any deficiencies in the report within 90 days of receipt. That person or agent shall have 30 days from receipt of the notification to correct the noted deficiencies and forward the revised report to the director and the lead agency. Any person who fails to comply with this section, or knowingly provides incorrect or false information in reports required by this section, may be subject to an administrative penalty as provided in subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1.
(d)(1)The board shall impose, by regulation, pursuant to paragraph (2), an annual reporting fee on, and method for collecting annual fees from, each active or idle mining operation. The maximum fee for any single mining operation may not exceed four thousand dollars ($4,000) annually and may not be less than one hundred dollars ($100) annually, as adjusted for the cost of living as measured by the California Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers, calendar year averages, using the percentage change in the previous year, beginning with the 200506 fiscal year and annually thereafter.
(2)(A)The board shall adopt, by regulation, a schedule of fees authorized under paragraph (1) to cover the departments cost in carrying out this section and Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), as reflected in the Governors proposed Budget, and may adopt those regulations as emergency regulations. In establishing the schedule of fees to be paid by each active and idle mining operation, the fees shall be calculated on an equitable basis reflecting the size and type of operation. The board shall also consider the total assessed value of the mining operation, the acreage disturbed by mining activities, and the acreage subject to the reclamation plan.
(B)Regulations adopted pursuant to this subdivision shall be adopted by the board in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code). The adoption of any emergency regulations pursuant to this subdivision shall be considered necessary to address an emergency and shall be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, and general welfare.
(3)The total revenue generated by the reporting fees may not exceed, and may be less than, the amount of three million five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000), as adjusted for the cost of living as measured by the California Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers, calendar year averages, using the percentage change in the previous year, beginning with the 200506 fiscal year and annually thereafter. If the director determines that the revenue collected during the preceding fiscal year was greater or less than the cost to operate the program, the board shall adjust the fees to compensate for the overcollection or undercollection of revenues.
(4)(A)The reporting fees established pursuant to this subdivision shall be deposited in the Mine Reclamation Account, which is hereby created. Any fees, penalties, interest, fines, or charges collected by the director or board pursuant to this chapter or Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710) shall be deposited in the Mine Reclamation Account. The money in the account shall be available to the department and board, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purpose of carrying out this section and complying with Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), which includes, but is not limited to, classification and designation of areas with mineral resources of statewide or regional significance, reclamation plan and financial assurance review, mine inspection, and enforcement.
(B)(i)In addition to reporting fees, the board shall collect five dollars ($5) per ounce of gold and ten cents ($0.10) per ounce of silver mined within the state and shall deposit the fees collected in the Abandoned Mine Reclamation and Minerals Fund Subaccount, which is hereby created in the Mine Reclamation Account. The department may expend the moneys in the subaccount, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for only the purposes of Section 2796.5 and as authorized herein for the remediation of abandoned mines.
(ii)Notwithstanding subdivision (j) of Section 2796.5, fees collected pursuant to clause (i) may also be used to remediate features of historic abandoned mines and lands that they impact. For the purposes of this section, historic abandoned mines are mines for which operations have been conducted before January 1, 1976, and include, but are not limited to, historic gold and silver mines.
(5)In case of late payment of the reporting fee, a penalty of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) or 10 percent of the amount due, whichever is greater, plus interest at the rate of 11/2 percent per month, computed from the delinquent date of the assessment until and including the date of payment, shall be assessed. New mining operations that have not submitted a report shall submit a report prior to commencement of operations. The new operation shall submit its fee according to the reasonable fee schedule adopted by the board, and the month that the report is received shall become that operations anniversary month.
(e)The lead agency, or the board when acting as the lead agency, may impose a fee upon each mining operation to cover the reasonable costs incurred in implementing this chapter and Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710).
(f)For purposes of this section, mining operation means a mining operation of any kind or character whatever in this state, including, but not limited to, a mining operation that is classified as a surface mining operation as defined in Section 2735, unless excepted by Section 2714. For the purposes of fee collections only, mining operation may include one or more mines operated by a single operator or mining company on one or more sites, if the total annual combined mineral production for all sites is less than 100 troy ounces for precious metals, if precious metals are the primary mineral commodity produced, or less than 100,000 short tons if the primary mineral commodity produced is not precious metals.
(g)Any information in reports submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) that includes or otherwise indicates the total mineral production, reserves, or rate of depletion of any mining operation may not be disclosed to any member of the public, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 6252 of the Government Code. Other portions of the reports are public records unless excepted by statute. Statistical bulletins based on these reports and published under Section 2205 shall be compiled to show, for the state as a whole and separately for each lead agency, the total of each mineral produced therein. In order not to disclose the production, reserves, or rate of depletion from any identifiable mining operation, no production figure shall be published or otherwise disclosed unless that figure is the aggregated production of not less than three mining operations. If the production figure for any lead agency would disclose the production, reserves, or rate of depletion of less than three mining operations or otherwise permit the reasonable inference of the production, reserves, or rate of depletion of any identifiable mining operation, that figure shall be combined with the same figure of not less than two other lead agencies without regard to the location of the lead agencies. The bulletin shall be published annually by June 30 or as soon thereafter as practicable.
(h)The approval of a form by the board pursuant to this section is not the adoption of a regulation for purposes of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code) and is not subject to that act.
SEC. 2.Section 2717 of the Public Resources Code, as amended by Section 2 of Chapter 417 of the Statutes of 2013, is amended to read:2717.(a)Notwithstanding Section 10231.5 of the Government Code, the board shall submit to the Legislature on December 1 of each year a report on the actions taken pursuant to this chapter during the preceding fiscal year. The report shall include a statement of the actions, including legislative recommendations, that are necessary to carry out more completely the purposes and requirements of this chapter.
(b)For the purposes of ensuring compliance with Sections 10295.5 and 20676 of the Public Contract Code, the department shall, at a minimum, quarterly publish in the California Regulatory Notice Register, or otherwise make available upon request to the Department of General Services or any other state or local agency, a list identifying all of the following:
(1)Surface mining operations for which a report is required and has been submitted pursuant to Section 2207 that indicates all of the following:
(A)The reclamation plan and financial assurances have been approved pursuant to this chapter.
(B)Compliance with state reclamation standards developed pursuant to Section 2773.
(C)Compliance with the financial assurance guidelines developed pursuant to Section 2773.1.
(D)Whether the annual reporting fee has been submitted to the department.
(2)Surface mining operations for which an appeal is pending before the board pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2770, if the appeal was not pending before the board for more than 180 days.
(3)Surface mining operations for which an inspection is required and for which an inspection notice has been submitted by the lead agency pursuant to Section 2774 that indicates both compliance with the approved reclamation plan and that sufficient financial assurances, pursuant to Section 2773.1, have been approved and secured.
(4)Surface mining operations that meet all of the following:
(A)The reclamation plan has been approved and is in compliance with this chapter.
(B)The mining operation is in compliance with either of the following:
(i)The approved reclamation plan.
(ii)An order to comply issued pursuant to this chapter and that is being complied with by the operator. An order to comply may be stipulated to as follows:
(I)By the department, lead agency, and operator if the enforcement action was initiated by the director.
(II)By the lead agency and the operator, with notice of the stipulation provided to the director if the enforcement action was initiated by the lead agency.
(C)In accordance with Section 2773.1 and Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, as amended, the surface mining operation has an approved financial assurance in place that is adequate for reclamation pursuant to the approved reclamation plan.
(c)Between July 1, 2017, and January 1, 2018, the department shall submit to the Legislature a report on the activities of lead agencies and surface mining operations. This report shall include, but need not be limited to, all of the following:
(1)Number of financial assurance cost estimates reviewed and approved each year by each lead agency.
(2)Number of annual mine inspections performed by each lead agency.
(3)Information on idle mines and interim management plans approved by each lead agency.
(4)Number and location of mining operations that are no longer in operation with no intent to resume and are in the process of reclamation and how many years each of these mining operations has claimed that status.
(5)Information on approved mineral resources management plans across the state from the board.
(6)Number and location of mines with reclamation plans approved prior to the adoption of the 1993 reclamation standards.
(7)Percentage of mining operations on the list published pursuant to subdivision (b) and the number and location of mining operations that have been placed on the list pursuant to clause (ii) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (b).
(8)Number of historic abandoned mines remediated by the department and the locations of known remaining hazards.
(9)Number, types, and status of notices of violations and orders to comply issued by the department organized by location.
(10)Number of administrative penalties issued by the department and amounts, as well as information on the amounts actually collected by the department organized by location.
(d)A report submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) or (c) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.
SEC. 3.Section 2717 of the Public Resources Code, as added by Section 3 of Chapter 417 of the Statutes of 2013, is repealed.SEC. 4.SEC. 2.Section 2773.1 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2773.1.(a)Lead agencies shall require financial assurances of each surface mining operation to ensure reclamation is performed in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan, as follows:
(1)Financial assurances may take the form of surety bonds executed by an admitted surety insurer, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 995.120 of the Code of Civil Procedure, irrevocable letters of credit, trust funds, or other forms of financial assurances specified by the board pursuant to subdivision (e) that the lead agency reasonably determines are adequate to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan.
(2)The financial assurances shall remain in effect for the duration of the surface mining operation and any additional period until reclamation is completed.
(3)The amount of financial assurances required of a surface mining operation for any one year shall be reviewed and, if necessary, adjusted once each calendar year to account for new lands disturbed by surface mining operations, inflation, and reclamation of lands accomplished in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. An operator shall not be required to adjust financial assurances that are in excess of the amount determined necessary to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan. An operator shall be required to replace an approved financial assurance mechanism to bond for the reclamation of the surface mining operation only if the financial assurance cost estimate identifies a need to increase the amount of the financial assurance mechanism.
(4)Financial assurance cost estimates shall be submitted to the lead agency for review on the form adopted by the board by regulation pursuant to subdivision (f). The estimates shall include estimates of the time needed to complete reclamation of the mine in accordance with the approved reclamation plan, including, but not limited to, any monitoring studies required by the reclamation plan.
(5)The financial assurances shall be made payable to the lead agency and the department. Financial assurances that were approved by the lead agency prior to January 1, 1993, and were made payable to the State Geologist shall be considered payable to the department for purposes of this chapter. However, if a surface mining operation has received approval of its financial assurances from a public agency other than the lead agency, the lead agency shall deem those financial assurances adequate for purposes of this section, or shall credit them toward fulfillment of the financial assurances required by this section, if they are made payable to the public agency, the lead agency, and the department and otherwise meet the requirements of this section. In any event, if a lead agency and one or more public agencies exercise jurisdiction over a surface mining operation, the total amount of financial assurances required by the lead agency and the public agencies for any one year shall not exceed that amount that is necessary to perform reclamation of lands remaining disturbed. For purposes of this paragraph, a public agency may include a federal agency.
(b)If the lead agency or the board, following a public hearing, determines that the operator is financially incapable of performing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan, or has abandoned its surface mining operation without commencing reclamation, either the lead agency or the director shall do all of the following:
(1)Notify the operator by personal service or certified mail that the lead agency or the director intends to take appropriate action to forfeit the financial assurances and specify the reasons for so doing.
(2)Allow the operator 60 days to commence or cause the commencement of reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan and require that reclamation be completed within the time limits specified in the approved reclamation plan or some other time period mutually agreed upon by the lead agency or the director and the operator.
(3)Proceed to take appropriate action to require forfeiture of the financial assurances if the operator does not substantially comply with paragraph (2).
(4)Use the proceeds from the forfeited financial assurances to conduct and complete reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. The financial assurances shall not be used for any other purpose. The operator is responsible for the costs of conducting and completing reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan that are in excess of the proceeds from the forfeited financial assurances.
(c)Financial assurances shall no longer be required of a surface mining operation, and shall be released, upon written notification by the lead agency, which shall be forwarded to the operator and the director, that reclamation has been completed in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. If a mining operation is sold or ownership is transferred to another person, the existing financial assurances shall remain in force and shall not be released by the lead agency until new financial assurances are secured from the new owner and have been approved by the lead agency in accordance with Section 2770.
(d)The lead agency shall have primary responsibility to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and to reclaim mine sites under subdivision (b). However, in cases where the board is not the lead agency pursuant to Section 2774.4, the director may act to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and reclaim mine sites pursuant to subdivision (b) only if both of the following occurs:
(1)The financial incapability of the operator or the abandonment of the mining operation has come to the attention of the director.
(2)The lead agency has been notified in writing by the director of the financial incapability of the operator or the abandonment of the mining operation for at least 15 days, the lead agency has not taken appropriate measures to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances and reclaim the mine site, and one of the following has occurred:
(A)The lead agency has been notified in writing by the director that failure to take appropriate measures to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances or to reclaim the mine site shall result in actions being taken against the lead agency under Section 2774.4.
(B)The director determines that there is a violation that amounts to an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health, safety, or to the environment.
(C)The lead agency notifies the director in writing that its good faith attempts to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances have not been successful.
The director shall comply with subdivision (b) in seeking forfeiture of financial assurances and reclaiming mine sites.
(e)The board may adopt regulations specifying financial assurance mechanisms other than surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, and trust funds, which the board determines are reasonably available and adequate to ensure reclamation pursuant to this chapter, but these mechanisms shall not include financial tests, or surety bonds executed by one or more personal sureties. These mechanisms may include reclamation bond pool programs.
(f)On or before March 1, 1993, the board shall adopt guidelines to implement this section. The guidelines are exempt from the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code), and are not subject to review by the Office of Administrative Law.
SEC. 5.Section 2773.11 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2773.11.(a)Prior to the modification of the amount of a financial assurance or the full or partial release of the financial assurance instrument to which both the lead agency and the department are cobeneficiaries pursuant to Section 2773.1, the lead agency shall provide to the director all of the following documents at one time:
(1)An inspection report, prepared by a qualified person pursuant to Section 2774, indicating that there are aspects of the surface mining operation that require modification of the existing financial assurance amount or stating that the mined land has been reclaimed in full or in part, as the case may be, in accordance with the approved reclamation plan.
(2)A revised financial assurance cost estimate prepared by the operator and accepted by the lead agency, or prepared by the lead agency pursuant to Section 2773.1, with supporting documentation that indicates the specific cost changes to the existing financial assurance amount, or that indicates there are no further outstanding reclamation liabilities to be included in the financial assurance.
(3)A statement by the lead agency, with supporting documentation that may include the most recent inspection report and any geological and engineering reports prepared as part of the inspection report, that the mined land remains subject to a financial assurance as modified or that the mined land has been reclaimed in accordance with the approved reclamation plan, that there are no outstanding reclamation liabilities, and recommending to the director that the financial assurance be released.
(4)The director shall review and comment on the documents within 45 days from the date of receipt of the documents, pursuant to Section 2774. The director shall inspect the surface mining operation if the director determines it necessary pursuant to Section 2774.1 and shall do any of the following:
(A)Notify the lead agency of the directors concurrence that the modified financial assurance amount is adequate or that there are no outstanding reclamation liabilities on the mined land and that the original financial assurance should be released in full or in part pursuant to Section 2773.1, at which time the financial assurance shall be released.
(B)Notify the lead agency that the director has found, based on an inspection, aspects of the surface mining operation that require additional modifications to the financial assurance amount or aspects that are not in compliance with the approved reclamation plan.
(C)Commence the financial assurance forfeiture process pursuant to Section 2773.1.
(b)(1)An operator may request the lead agency and the director jointly to inspect and review a request for full or partial release of a financial assurance instrument. Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the operator may submit a request for a joint inspection and review to the lead agency and the director along with the surface mining operations most recent inspection report, a revised financial assurance cost estimate, and other supporting documentation.
(2)The lead agency and the director shall conduct a joint inspection for the purpose of evaluating the operators request within 90 days after receipt of the operators request.
(3)Within 45 days after completion of the joint inspection, the lead agency and the director shall do any of the following:
(A)Notify the operator the modified financial assurance amount is adequate or that there are no outstanding reclamation liabilities on the mined land and that the original financial assurance should be released in full or in part pursuant to Section 2773.1, at which time the financial assurance shall be released.
(B)Notify the operator that aspects of the surface mining operation require additional modifications to the financial assurance amount or that aspects of the surface mining operation are not in compliance with the approved reclamation plan.
(C)Commence the financial assurance forfeiture process pursuant to Section 2773.1.
(c)If a violation by the operator is confirmed by an inspection either by the lead agency or by the director, the lead agency or the director may take actions pursuant to Section 2774.1 to ensure the violation is corrected. The financial assurance shall not be released until the violation is corrected.
(d)Prior to sending written notification and release of financial assurances pursuant to Section 2773.1, the lead agency shall obtain the written concurrence of the director that the completion of reclamation of the mined land disturbed by the surface mining operation is in accordance with the requirements of the reclamation plan approved by the lead agency.
(e)The board shall promulgate a regulation consistent with this section.
SEC. 6.SEC. 3.Section 2774 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.(a)Every lead agency shall adopt ordinances in accordance with state policy that establish procedures for the review and approval of reclamation plans and financial assurances and the issuance of a permit to conduct surface mining operations, except that any lead agency without an active surface mining operation in its jurisdiction may defer adopting an implementing ordinance until the filing of a permit application. The ordinances shall establish procedures requiring at least one public hearing and shall be periodically reviewed by the lead agency and revised, as necessary, to ensure that the ordinances continue to be in accordance with state policy.
(b)Surface mining operations shall be inspected annually, solely to determine whether the surface mining operation is in compliance with its reclamation plan as described in subdivision (c) of Section 2772. The lead agency shall cause an inspection to be conducted by a state licensed geologist, state licensed civil engineer, state licensed landscape architect, state licensed forester, or a lead agency employee who is a mine inspector qualified pursuant to subdivision (i), (h), who is experienced in land reclamation and who has not been employed by the surface mining operation being inspected in any capacity during the previous 12 months, except that a lead agency employee who is a qualified mine inspector may inspect surface mining operations conducted by another department within the local agency. All inspections shall be conducted using a form developed by the department and approved by the board that includes the professional licensing and disciplinary information of the person who conducted the inspection. The operator shall be solely responsible for the reasonable cost of the inspection. The lead agency or the inspector qualified pursuant to subdivision (i) (h), shall provide a notice of completion of inspection to the director within 90 days of conducting the inspection. The notice shall contain a statement regarding the surface mining operations compliance with its approved reclamation plan, as described in subdivision (c) of Section 2772, a copy of the completed inspection form, and which aspects of the surface mining operations, if any, are inconsistent with its approved reclamation plan, as described in subdivision (c) of Section 2772, and any corrective measures recommended by the inspector. If the surface mining operation has a review of its reclamation plan, financial assurances, or an interim management plan pending under subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (h) of Section 2770, or an appeal pending before the board or lead agency governing body under subdivision (e) or (h) of Section 2770, the notice shall so indicate. The lead agency shall forward to the operator a copy of the notice, a copy of the completed inspection form, and any supporting documentation, including, but not limited to, any inspection report prepared by the geologist, civil engineer, landscape architect, forester, or mine inspector qualified pursuant to subdivision (i) (h) who conducted the inspection.
(c)Before approving a surface mining operations reclamation plan or financial assurances, or any amendments to the reclamation plan and adjustments to financial assurances based on an amendment to a reclamation plan, the lead agency shall submit the plan, assurances, or amendments to the director for review. The plan or amendments shall be submitted to the director as early as practicable in order to facilitate review of the plan pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)). All documentation for that submission shall be submitted to the director at one time. When the lead agency submits a reclamation plan or plan amendments to the director for review, the lead agency shall also submit to the director, for use in reviewing the reclamation plan or plan amendments, information from any prior final related document prepared, adopted, or certified pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)), and shall submit any other pertinent information. The lead agency shall certify to the director that the reclamation plan is considered complete and in substantial compliance with the applicable requirements of this chapter and Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations and the lead agencys mining ordinance in effect at the time that the reclamation plan is submitted to the director for review.
(d)(1)The director shall have 30 days from the date of receipt of a reclamation plan or plan amendments submitted pursuant to subdivision (c), and 45 days from the date of receipt of financial assurances submitted pursuant to subdivision (c), to prepare written comments, if the director so chooses. The lead agency shall evaluate written comments received from the director relating to the reclamation plan, plan amendments, or financial assurances within a reasonable amount of time.
(2)The lead agency shall prepare a written response to the directors comments describing the disposition of the major issues raised by the directors comments, and submit the lead agencys proposed response to the director at least 30 days prior to approval of the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance. The lead agencys response to the directors comments shall describe whether the lead agency proposes to adopt the directors comments to the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance. If the lead agency does not propose to adopt the directors comments, the lead agency shall specify, in detail, why the lead agency proposes not to adopt the comments. Copies of any written comments received and responses prepared by the lead agency shall be forwarded to the operator. The lead agency shall also give the director at least 30 days notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing before the lead agency at which time the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance is scheduled to be approved by the lead agency. If no hearing is required by this chapter, or by the local ordinance, or other state law, then the lead agency shall provide 30 days notice to the director that it intends to approve the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance. The lead agency shall send to the director its final response to the directors comments within 30 days following its approval of the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance, along with final approved copies of those documents, during which period the department retains all powers, duties, and authorities of this chapter.
(3)To the extent there is a conflict between the comments of a trustee agency or a responsible agency that are based on the agencys statutory or regulatory authority and the comments of other commenting agencies that are received by the lead agency pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) regarding a reclamation plan or plan amendments, the lead agency shall consider only the comments of the trustee agency or responsible agency.
(e)(1)If an operator does not request an inspection date on the annual report filed pursuant to Section 2207, or if the lead agency is unable to cause the inspection of a given surface mining operation on the date requested by the operator, the lead agency shall provide the operator with a minimum of 30 five days written notice of a pending inspection or a lesser time period if agreed to by the operator.
(2)Within 30 days of an annual inspection being conducted pursuant to this section, each operator shall provide an annual financial assurance cost estimate, on the form developed by the board by regulation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1, to the director and the lead agency for review.
(3)The director shall have 45 days from the date of receipt of the operators annual financial assurance cost estimate to prepare written comments on the operators financial assurances and provide the comments to the lead agency and the operator. The lead agency shall have 30 days from receipt of the directors comments to evaluate the written comments received from the director and provide the director and operator its proposed response to the director. The lead agency shall accept or reject a surface mining operations annual financial assurance cost estimate within 60 days of receipt of the directors comments or the due date of the directors comments if comments are not received. The lead agency shall send to the director its final response to the directors comments within 30 days of its acceptance of the annual financial assurance cost estimate.
(4)If the lead agency determines an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate is inadequate, the lead agency shall specify the reasons for that determination. The operator shall have 30 days to appeal that denial pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2770 or provide a revised financial assurance cost estimate incorporating the suggested changes to the director and the lead agency for approval by the lead agency.
(5)The operator shall provide the director and the lead agency with a revised financial assurances mechanism within 60 days of the lead agencys approval. An operator shall not be required to adjust financial assurances that are in excess of the amount determined necessary to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan provided that financial assurance mechanism remains in effect. An operator shall be required to replace an approved financial assurance mechanism to bond for the reclamation of the surface mining operation only if the financial assurance cost estimate identifies a need to increase the amount of the financial assurance mechanism.
(f)(1)No later than April 1 of each year, the director shall provide each lead agency with a notice listing each active or idle surface mining operation within the lead agencys jurisdiction. For each surface mining operation, the director shall request and the lead agency shall provide to the director, on a form provided by the director, no later than July 1 of each year, the following information:
(A)A copy of any permit or reclamation plan amendments, as applicable.
(B)A statement that there have been no changes during the previous year, as applicable.
(C)The date of each surface mining operations last inspection.
(D)The date of each surface mining operations last financial assurance review pursuant to Section 2773.1 for each operation listed.
(2)The director shall request similar information on any new or omitted operations, to be provided to the director no later than July 1 of each year.
(3)The form provided by the director shall include the departments current information for each operation. The notice to each lead agency shall include a statement that failure to file with the director the information requested pursuant to this subdivision may be cause for action pursuant to Section 2774.4.
(g)The review and approval of financial assurances pursuant to this section shall not be considered a project for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
(h)(1)If a surface mining operation is not inspected by the lead agency on the date requested by the operator pursuant to Section 2207 and the operator has not received a 30-day notice of pending inspection from the lead agency as provided in subdivision (e), the operator may send a notice to the lead agency and the director stating the operators intent to have the surface mining operation inspected by a third party who has not been employed in any capacity by the operator in the previous 12 months and who is a state-licensed geologist, state-licensed civil engineer, state-licensed landscape architect, or state-licensed forester who is experienced in land reclamation. An inspector retained by the operator pursuant to this section shall provide the lead agency a 15-day notice of the inspectors intended inspection date for the operation and shall provide a reasonable opportunity for a representative of the lead agency to attend the inspection.
(2)An inspector who inspects a surface mining operation pursuant to this subdivision shall provide the notice of completion of inspection specified in subdivision (b) to the director and the lead agency, whether or not a lead agency representative participated in the inspection. The notice shall include the stamp of the licensed professional who conducted the inspection.
(i)
(h)(1)The State Geologist shall coordinate with the director, board, lead agencies, and interested parties to develop a curriculum for the training of mine inspectors. The curriculum shall include, but need not be limited to, all of the following:
(A)Training on determining revegetative success.
(B)Evaluating slopes for signs of instability.
(C)How to properly use the inspection form approved by the board.
(D)The calculation of financial assurances.
(E)Considerations for corrective measures.
(F)Other issues necessary to ensure the consistent inspection of surface mines under this chapter.
(2)Lead agency employees who inspect surface mining operations under this chapter shall be deemed qualified mine inspectors for up to two years after the State Geologist has finalized the curriculum pursuant to paragraph (1) and the training has been available to lead agency employees.
(3)A lead agency employee who has completed the training curriculum developed pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be a qualified mine inspector.
(4)Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to affect or impose qualifications or standards on employees designated by a local, state, or federal agency to perform inspections of real property under separate provisions of local, state, or federal law, including, but not limited to, the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code), the federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.), and the Fish and Game Code, notwithstanding the fact that that informational addenda are submitted to lead agencies pursuant to this chapter in addition to reclamation plans, including materials submitted pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 2772.
(5)Absent express authorization under this chapter, mine inspectors shall not inspect operations for the purpose of evaluating compliance with separate provisions of local, state, or federal law, including, but not limited to, the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code), the federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.), and the Fish and Game Code.
SEC. 7.Section 2774.1 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.1.(a)Except as provided in subdivision (i) of Section 2770, if the lead agency or the director determines, based upon an annual inspection pursuant to Section 2774, or otherwise confirmed by an inspection of the mining operation, that a surface mining operation is not in compliance with this chapter, the lead agency or the director may notify the operator of that violation by personal service or certified mail. If the violation extends beyond 30 days after the date of the lead agencys or the directors notification, the lead agency or the director may issue an order by personal service or certified mail requiring the operator to comply with this chapter or, if the operator does not have an approved reclamation plan or financial assurances, cease all further mining activities.
(b)An order issued under subdivision (a) shall not take effect until the operator has been provided a hearing before the lead agency for orders issued by the lead agency, or board for orders issued by the director, concerning the alleged violation. An order issued under subdivision (a) shall specify which aspects of the surface mines activities or operations are inconsistent with this chapter, shall specify a time for compliance that the lead agency or director determines is reasonable, taking into account the seriousness of the violation and any good faith efforts to comply with applicable requirements, and shall set a date for the hearing, which shall not be sooner than 30 days after the date of the order.
(c)An operator who violates or fails to comply with an order issued under subdivision (a) after the orders effective date, as provided in subdivision (b), or who fails to submit a report to the director or lead agency as required by Section 2207, shall be subject to an order by the lead agency or the director imposing an administrative penalty of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) per day, assessed from the original date of noncompliance with this chapter or Section 2207. The penalty may be imposed administratively by the lead agency or the director. In determining the amount of the administrative penalty, the lead agency or the director shall take into consideration the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation or violations, any prior history of violations, the degree of culpability, economic savings, if any, resulting from the violation, and any other matters justice may require. Orders setting administrative penalties shall become effective upon issuance of the order and payment shall be made to the lead agency or the director within 30 days, unless the operator petitions the legislative body of the lead agency, the board, or the superior court for review as provided in Section 2774.2. An order shall be served by personal service or by certified mail upon the operator. Penalties collected by the director shall not be used for purposes other than to cover the reasonable costs incurred by the director in implementing this chapter or Section 2207.
(d)If the lead agency or the director determines that the surface mine is not in compliance with this chapter, so that the surface mine presents an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or the environment, the lead agency or the Attorney General, on behalf of the director, may seek an order from a court of competent jurisdiction enjoining that operation.
(e)Upon a complaint by the director, the department, or the board, the Attorney General may bring an action to recover administrative penalties under this section, and penalties under Section 2207, in any court of competent jurisdiction in this state against any person violating any provision of this chapter or Section 2207, or any regulation adopted pursuant to this chapter or Section 2207. The Attorney General may bring this action on his or her own initiative if, after examining the complaint and the evidence, he or she believes a violation has occurred. The Attorney General may also seek an order from a court of competent jurisdiction compelling the operator to comply with this chapter and Section 2207.
(f)(1)The lead agency has primary responsibility for enforcing this chapter and Section 2207. In cases where the board is not the lead agency pursuant to Section 2774.4, enforcement actions may be initiated by the director pursuant to this section only after the violation has come to the attention of the director and either of the following occurs:
(A)The lead agency has been notified by the director in writing of the violation for at least 30 days, and has not taken appropriate enforcement action, which may include failing to issue an order to comply within a reasonable time after issuing a notice of violation.
(B)The director determines that there is a violation that amounts to an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or safety, or to the environment.
(2)The director shall comply with this section in initiating enforcement actions.
(g)In exercising enforcement authority pursuant to this section, the lead agency, the director, or the board, as appropriate, shall take into account and seek to minimize the impact of any proposed enforcement action on the number of existing jobs supported directly or indirectly by the surface mining operation.
(h)Remedies under this section are in addition to, and do not supersede or limit, any and all other remedies, civil or criminal.
SEC. 4.Section 2774.2 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.2.(a)Within 30 days of the issuance of an order setting administrative penalties under subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1, the operator may petition that legislative body of the lead agency, if the lead agency has issued the order, or the board for orders issued by the director, for review of the order. If the operator does not petition for review within the time limits set by this subdivision, the order setting administrative penalties shall not be subject to review by any court or agency.
(b)The legislative body of the lead agency or the board shall notify the operator by personal service or certified mail whether it will review the order setting administrative penalties. In reviewing an order pursuant to this section, the record shall consist of the record before the lead agency or the director, director and any other relevant evidence which, in the judgment of the legislative body or the board, should be considered to effectuate and implement the policies of this chapter.
(c)The legislative body or the board may affirm, modify, or set aside, in whole or in part, by its own order, any order an order of the lead agency or the director setting administrative penalties reviewed by the legislative body or the board pursuant to this section.
(d)Any An order of the legislative body or the board issued under subdivision (c) shall become effective upon its issuance thereof, unless the operator petitions the superior court for review as provided in subdivision (e). Any An order shall be served by personal service or by certified mail upon the operator. Payment of any an administrative penalty which that is specified in an order issued under pursuant to subdivision (c), (c) shall be made to the lead agency or the director within 30 days of service of the order; however, order. However, the payment shall be held in an interest bearing impound account pending the resolution of a petition for review filed pursuant to subdivision (e).
(e)Any An operator aggrieved by an order of the legislative body or the board issued under pursuant to subdivision (c) may obtain review of the order by filing in the superior court a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days following the issuance of the order. Any An operator aggrieved by an order of a lead agency or the director setting administrative penalties under pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1, for which the legislative body or board denies review, may obtain review of the order in the superior court by filing in the court a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days following the denial of review. The provisions of Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall govern judicial proceedings pursuant to this subdivision, except that in every case the court shall exercise its independent judgment. If the operator does not petition for a writ of mandate within the time limits set by this subdivision, an order of the board or the legislative body shall not be subject to review by any court or agency.
(f)(1)After the expiration of the time to petition for review pursuant to subdivision (a) or (e), the director or the board acting as the lead agency may apply to the small claims court or the superior court, depending on the jurisdictional amount, in the county where the administrative penalty was imposed for a judgment to collect the unpaid administrative penalty imposed pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1. The application shall include all of the following:
(A)The order setting the administrative penalty pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1.
(B)A notice to the operator of the right to petition for review of the order.
(C)Either of the following:
(i)A declaration from the board that no petition was made or that the board declined to review the petition.
(ii)A copy of the final order of the board.
(2)An application submitted pursuant to this subdivision shall constitute a sufficient showing to warrant the issuance of the judgment. The court clerk shall enter the judgment immediately in conformity with the application.
(3)The judgment entered pursuant to this subdivision shall have the same force and effect as, and shall be subject to all the provisions of law relating to, a judgment in a civil action and may be enforced in the same manner as any other judgment of the court. The court shall make enforcement of the judgment a priority.
SEC. 8.SEC. 5.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
(a)The owner or the operator of a mining operation within the state shall forward to the director annually, not later than a date established by the director, upon forms approved by the board from time to time, a report that identifies and contains all of the following:
(1)The name, address, and telephone number of the person, company, or other owner of the mining operation.
(2)The name, address, and telephone number of a designated agent who resides in this state, and who will receive and accept service of all orders, notices, and processes of the lead agency, board, director, or court.
(3)The location of the mining operation, its name, its mine number as issued by the Office of Mine Reclamation or the director, its section, township, range, latitude, longitude, and approximate boundaries of the mining operation marked on a United States Geological Survey 71/2-minute or 15-minute quadrangle map.
(4)The lead agency.
(5)The approval date of the mining operations reclamation plan.
(6)The mining operations status as active, idle, reclaimed, or in the process of being reclaimed.
(7)The commodities produced by the mine and the type of mining operation.
(8)A copy of the previously completed annual inspection form and a requested date for the next annual inspection by the lead agency.
(9)Proof of financial assurances.
(10)Ownership of the property, including government agencies, if applicable, by the assessors parcel number, and total assessed value of the mining operation.
(11)The approximate permitted size of the mining operation subject to Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), in acres.
(12)The approximate total acreage of land newly disturbed by the mining operation during the previous calendar year.
(13)The approximate total of disturbed acreage reclaimed during the previous calendar year.
(14)The approximate total unreclaimed disturbed acreage remaining as of the end of the calendar year.
(15)The total production for each mineral commodity produced during the previous year.
(16)A copy of any approved reclamation plan and any amendments or conditions of approval to any existing reclamation plan approved by the lead agency.
(b)(1)Every year, not later than the date established by the director, the person submitting the report pursuant to subdivision (a) shall forward to the lead agency, upon forms furnished by the board, a report that provides all of the information specified in subdivision (a).
(2)The owner or operator of a mining operation shall allow access to the property to any governmental agency or the agent of any company providing financial assurances in connection with the reclamation plan in order that the reclamation can be carried out by the entity or company, in accordance with the provisions of the reclamation plan.
(c)Subsequent reports shall include only changes in the information submitted for the items described in subdivision (a), except that, instead of the approved reclamation plan, the reports shall include any reclamation plan amendments approved during the previous year. The reports shall state whether review of a reclamation plan, financial assurances, or an interim management plan is pending under subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (h) of Section 2770, or whether an appeal before the board or lead agency governing body is pending under subdivision (e) or (h) of Section 2770. The director shall notify the person submitting the report and the owners designated agent in writing that the report and the fee required pursuant to subdivision (d) have been received, specify the mining operations mine number if one has not been issued by the Office of Mine Reclamation, and notify the person and agent of any deficiencies in the report within 90 days of receipt. That person or agent shall have 30 days from receipt of the notification to correct the noted deficiencies and forward the revised report to the director and the lead agency. Any person who fails to comply with this section, or knowingly provides incorrect or false information in reports required by this section, may be subject to an administrative penalty as provided in subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1.
(d)(1)The board shall impose, by regulation, pursuant to paragraph (2), an annual reporting fee on, and method for collecting annual fees from, each active or idle mining operation. The maximum fee for any single mining operation may not exceed four thousand dollars ($4,000) annually and may not be less than one hundred dollars ($100) annually, as adjusted for the cost of living as measured by the California Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers, calendar year averages, using the percentage change in the previous year, beginning with the 200506 fiscal year and annually thereafter.
(2)(A)The board shall adopt, by regulation, a schedule of fees authorized under paragraph (1) to cover the departments cost in carrying out this section and Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), as reflected in the Governors proposed Budget, and may adopt those regulations as emergency regulations. In establishing the schedule of fees to be paid by each active and idle mining operation, the fees shall be calculated on an equitable basis reflecting the size and type of operation. The board shall also consider the total assessed value of the mining operation, the acreage disturbed by mining activities, and the acreage subject to the reclamation plan.
(B)Regulations adopted pursuant to this subdivision shall be adopted by the board in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code). The adoption of any emergency regulations pursuant to this subdivision shall be considered necessary to address an emergency and shall be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, and general welfare.
(3)The total revenue generated by the reporting fees may not exceed, and may be less than, the amount of three million five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000), as adjusted for the cost of living as measured by the California Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers, calendar year averages, using the percentage change in the previous year, beginning with the 200506 fiscal year and annually thereafter. If the director determines that the revenue collected during the preceding fiscal year was greater or less than the cost to operate the program, the board shall adjust the fees to compensate for the overcollection or undercollection of revenues.
(4)(A)The reporting fees established pursuant to this subdivision shall be deposited in the Mine Reclamation Account, which is hereby created. Any fees, penalties, interest, fines, or charges collected by the director or board pursuant to this chapter or Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710) shall be deposited in the Mine Reclamation Account. The money in the account shall be available to the department and board, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purpose of carrying out this section and complying with Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), which includes, but is not limited to, classification and designation of areas with mineral resources of statewide or regional significance, reclamation plan and financial assurance review, mine inspection, and enforcement.
(B)(i)In addition to reporting fees, the board shall collect five dollars ($5) per ounce of gold and ten cents ($0.10) per ounce of silver mined within the state and shall deposit the fees collected in the Abandoned Mine Reclamation and Minerals Fund Subaccount, which is hereby created in the Mine Reclamation Account. The department may expend the moneys in the subaccount, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for only the purposes of Section 2796.5 and as authorized herein for the remediation of abandoned mines.
(ii)Notwithstanding subdivision (j) of Section 2796.5, fees collected pursuant to clause (i) may also be used to remediate features of historic abandoned mines and lands that they impact. For the purposes of this section, historic abandoned mines are mines for which operations have been conducted before January 1, 1976, and include, but are not limited to, historic gold and silver mines.
(5)In case of late payment of the reporting fee, a penalty of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) or 10 percent of the amount due, whichever is greater, plus interest at the rate of 11/2 percent per month, computed from the delinquent date of the assessment until and including the date of payment, shall be assessed. New mining operations that have not submitted a report shall submit a report prior to commencement of operations. The new operation shall submit its fee according to the reasonable fee schedule adopted by the board, and the month that the report is received shall become that operations anniversary month.
(e)The lead agency, or the board when acting as the lead agency, may impose a fee upon each mining operation to cover the reasonable costs incurred in implementing this chapter and Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710).
(f)For purposes of this section, mining operation means a mining operation of any kind or character whatever in this state, including, but not limited to, a mining operation that is classified as a surface mining operation as defined in Section 2735, unless excepted by Section 2714. For the purposes of fee collections only, mining operation may include one or more mines operated by a single operator or mining company on one or more sites, if the total annual combined mineral production for all sites is less than 100 troy ounces for precious metals, if precious metals are the primary mineral commodity produced, or less than 100,000 short tons if the primary mineral commodity produced is not precious metals.
(g)Any information in reports submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) that includes or otherwise indicates the total mineral production, reserves, or rate of depletion of any mining operation may not be disclosed to any member of the public, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 6252 of the Government Code. Other portions of the reports are public records unless excepted by statute. Statistical bulletins based on these reports and published under Section 2205 shall be compiled to show, for the state as a whole and separately for each lead agency, the total of each mineral produced therein. In order not to disclose the production, reserves, or rate of depletion from any identifiable mining operation, no production figure shall be published or otherwise disclosed unless that figure is the aggregated production of not less than three mining operations. If the production figure for any lead agency would disclose the production, reserves, or rate of depletion of less than three mining operations or otherwise permit the reasonable inference of the production, reserves, or rate of depletion of any identifiable mining operation, that figure shall be combined with the same figure of not less than two other lead agencies without regard to the location of the lead agencies. The bulletin shall be published annually by June 30 or as soon thereafter as practicable.
(h)The approval of a form by the board pursuant to this section is not the adoption of a regulation for purposes of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code) and is not subject to that act.
SEC. 2.Section 2717 of the Public Resources Code, as amended by Section 2 of Chapter 417 of the Statutes of 2013, is amended to read:2717.(a)Notwithstanding Section 10231.5 of the Government Code, the board shall submit to the Legislature on December 1 of each year a report on the actions taken pursuant to this chapter during the preceding fiscal year. The report shall include a statement of the actions, including legislative recommendations, that are necessary to carry out more completely the purposes and requirements of this chapter.
(b)For the purposes of ensuring compliance with Sections 10295.5 and 20676 of the Public Contract Code, the department shall, at a minimum, quarterly publish in the California Regulatory Notice Register, or otherwise make available upon request to the Department of General Services or any other state or local agency, a list identifying all of the following:
(1)Surface mining operations for which a report is required and has been submitted pursuant to Section 2207 that indicates all of the following:
(A)The reclamation plan and financial assurances have been approved pursuant to this chapter.
(B)Compliance with state reclamation standards developed pursuant to Section 2773.
(C)Compliance with the financial assurance guidelines developed pursuant to Section 2773.1.
(D)Whether the annual reporting fee has been submitted to the department.
(2)Surface mining operations for which an appeal is pending before the board pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2770, if the appeal was not pending before the board for more than 180 days.
(3)Surface mining operations for which an inspection is required and for which an inspection notice has been submitted by the lead agency pursuant to Section 2774 that indicates both compliance with the approved reclamation plan and that sufficient financial assurances, pursuant to Section 2773.1, have been approved and secured.
(4)Surface mining operations that meet all of the following:
(A)The reclamation plan has been approved and is in compliance with this chapter.
(B)The mining operation is in compliance with either of the following:
(i)The approved reclamation plan.
(ii)An order to comply issued prior to January 1, 2019, pursuant to this chapter and that is being complied with by the operator. An order to comply may be stipulated to as follows:
(I)By the department, lead agency, and operator if the enforcement action was initiated by the director.
(II)By the lead agency and the operator, with notice of the stipulation provided to the director if the enforcement action was initiated by the lead agency.
(C)In accordance with Section 2773.1 and Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, as amended, the surface mining operation has an approved financial assurance in place that is adequate for reclamation pursuant to the approved reclamation plan.
(c)Between July 1, 2017, and January 1, 2018, the department shall submit to the Legislature a report on the activities of lead agencies and surface mining operations. This report shall include, but need not be limited to, all of the following:
(1)Number of financial assurance cost estimates reviewed and approved each year by each lead agency.
(2)Number of annual mine inspections performed by each lead agency.
(3)Information on idle mines and interim management plans approved by each lead agency.
(4)Number and location of mining operations that are no longer in operation with no intent to resume and are in the process of reclamation and how many years each of these mining operations has claimed that status.
(5)Information on approved mineral resources management plans across the state from the board.
(6)Number and location of mines with reclamation plans approved prior to the adoption of the 1993 reclamation standards.
(7)Percentage of mining operations on the list published pursuant to subdivision (b) and the number and location of mining operations that have been placed on the list pursuant to clause (ii) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (b).
(8)Number of historic abandoned mines remediated by the department and the locations of known remaining hazards.
(9)Number, types, and status of notices of violations and orders to comply issued by the department organized by location.
(10)Number of administrative penalties issued by the department and amounts, as well as information on the amounts actually collected by the department organized by location.
(d)A report submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) or (c) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.
SEC. 3.Section 2717 of the Public Resources Code, as added by Section 3 of Chapter 417 of the Statutes of 2013, is repealed.SEC. 4.Section 2773.1 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2773.1.(a)Lead agencies shall require financial assurances of each surface mining operation to ensure reclamation is performed in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan, as follows:
(1)Financial assurances may take the form of surety bonds executed by an admitted surety insurer, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 995.120 of the Code of Civil Procedure, irrevocable letters of credit, trust funds, or other forms of financial assurances specified by the board pursuant to subdivision (e) that the lead agency reasonably determines are adequate to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan.
(2)The financial assurances shall remain in effect for the duration of the surface mining operation and any additional period until reclamation is completed.
(3)The amount of financial assurances required of a surface mining operation for any one year shall be reviewed and, if necessary, adjusted once each calendar year to account for new lands disturbed by surface mining operations, inflation, and reclamation of lands accomplished in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. An operator shall not be required to adjust financial assurances that are in excess of the amount determined necessary to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan.
(4)Financial assurance cost estimates shall be submitted to the lead agency for review on the form adopted by the board by regulation pursuant to subdivision (f). The estimates shall include estimates of the time needed to complete reclamation of the mine in accordance with the approved reclamation plan, including, but not limited to, any monitoring studies required by the reclamation plan.
(5)The financial assurances shall be made payable to the lead agency and the department. Financial assurances that were approved by the lead agency prior to January 1, 1993, and were made payable to the State Geologist shall be considered payable to the department for purposes of this chapter. However, if a surface mining operation has received approval of its financial assurances from a public agency other than the lead agency, the lead agency shall deem those financial assurances adequate for purposes of this section, or shall credit them toward fulfillment of the financial assurances required by this section, if they are made payable to the public agency, the lead agency, and the department and otherwise meet the requirements of this section. In any event, if a lead agency and one or more public agencies exercise jurisdiction over a surface mining operation, the total amount of financial assurances required by the lead agency and the public agencies for any one year shall not exceed that amount that is necessary to perform reclamation of lands remaining disturbed. For purposes of this paragraph, a public agency may include a federal agency.
(b)If the lead agency or the board, following a public hearing, determines that the operator is financially incapable of performing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan, or has abandoned its surface mining operation without commencing reclamation, either the lead agency or the director shall do all of the following:
(1)Notify the operator by personal service or certified mail that the lead agency or the director intends to take appropriate action to forfeit the financial assurances and specify the reasons for so doing.
(2)Allow the operator 60 days to commence or cause the commencement of reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan and require that reclamation be completed within the time limits specified in the approved reclamation plan or some other time period mutually agreed upon by the lead agency or the director and the operator.
(3)Proceed to take appropriate action to require forfeiture of the financial assurances if the operator does not substantially comply with paragraph (2).
(4)Use the proceeds from the forfeited financial assurances to conduct and complete reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. The financial assurances shall not be used for any other purpose. The operator is responsible for the costs of conducting and completing reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan that are in excess of the proceeds from the forfeited financial assurances.
(c)Financial assurances shall no longer be required of a surface mining operation, and shall be released, upon written notification by the lead agency, which shall be forwarded to the operator and the director, that reclamation has been completed in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. If a mining operation is sold or ownership is transferred to another person, the existing financial assurances shall remain in force and shall not be released by the lead agency until new financial assurances are secured from the new owner and have been approved by the lead agency in accordance with Section 2770.
(d)The lead agency shall have primary responsibility to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and to reclaim mine sites under subdivision (b). However, in cases where the board is not the lead agency pursuant to Section 2774.4, the director may act to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and reclaim mine sites pursuant to subdivision (b) only if both of the following occurs:
(1)The financial incapability of the operator or the abandonment of the mining operation has come to the attention of the director.
(2)The lead agency has been notified in writing by the director of the financial incapability of the operator or the abandonment of the mining operation for at least 15 days, the lead agency has not taken appropriate measures to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances and reclaim the mine site, and one of the following has occurred:
(A)The lead agency has been notified in writing by the director that failure to take appropriate measures to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances or to reclaim the mine site shall result in actions being taken against the lead agency under Section 2774.4.
(B)The director determines that there is a violation that amounts to an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health, safety, or to the environment.
(C)The lead agency notifies the director in writing that its good faith attempts to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances have not been successful.
The director shall comply with subdivision (b) in seeking forfeiture of financial assurances and reclaiming mine sites.
(e)The board may adopt regulations specifying financial assurance mechanisms other than surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, and trust funds, which the board determines are reasonably available and adequate to ensure reclamation pursuant to this chapter, but these mechanisms shall not include financial tests, or surety bonds executed by one or more personal sureties. These mechanisms may include reclamation bond pool programs.
(f)On or before March 1, 1993, the board shall adopt guidelines to implement this section. The guidelines are exempt from the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code), and are not subject to review by the Office of Administrative Law.
SEC. 5.Section 2773.11 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2773.11.(a)Prior to the modification of the amount of a financial assurance or the full or partial release of the financial assurance instrument to which both the lead agency and the department are cobeneficiaries pursuant to Section 2773.1, the lead agency shall provide to the director all of the following documents at one time:
(1)An inspection report, prepared by a qualified person pursuant to Section 2774, indicating that there are aspects of the surface mining operation that require modification of the existing financial assurance amount or stating that the mined land has been reclaimed in full or in part, as the case may be, in accordance with the approved reclamation plan.
(2)A revised financial assurance cost estimate prepared by the operator and accepted by the lead agency, or prepared by the lead agency pursuant to Section 2773.1, with supporting documentation that indicates the specific cost changes to the existing financial assurance amount, or that indicates there are no further outstanding reclamation liabilities to be included in the financial assurance.
(3)A statement by the lead agency, with supporting documentation that may include the most recent inspection report and any geological and engineering reports prepared as part of the inspection report, that the mined land remains subject to a financial assurance as modified or that the mined land has been reclaimed in accordance with the approved reclamation plan, that there are no outstanding reclamation liabilities, and recommending to the director that the financial assurance be released.
(4)The director shall review and comment on the documents within 45 days from the date of receipt of the documents, pursuant to Section 2774. The director shall inspect the surface mining operation if the director determines it necessary pursuant to Section 2774.1 and shall do any of the following:
(A)Notify the lead agency of the directors concurrence that the modified financial assurance amount is adequate or that there are no outstanding reclamation liabilities on the mined land and that the original financial assurance should be released in full or in part pursuant to Section 2773.1, at which time the financial assurance shall be released.
(B)Notify the lead agency that the director has found, based on an inspection, aspects of the surface mining operation that require additional modifications to the financial assurance amount or aspects that are not in compliance with the approved reclamation plan.
(C)Commence the financial assurance forfeiture process pursuant to Section 2773.1.
(b)(1)An operator may request the lead agency and the director jointly to inspect and review a request for full or partial release of a financial assurance instrument. Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the operator may submit a request for a joint inspection and review to the lead agency and the director along with the surface mining operations most recent inspection report, a revised financial assurance cost estimate, and other supporting documentation.
(2)The lead agency and the director shall conduct a joint inspection for the purpose of evaluating the operators request within 90 days after receipt of the operators request.
(3)Within 45 days after completion of the joint inspection, the lead agency and the director shall do any of the following:
(A)Notify the operator the modified financial assurance amount is adequate or that there are no outstanding reclamation liabilities on the mined land and that the original financial assurance should be released in full or in part pursuant to Section 2773.1, at which time the financial assurance shall be released.
(B)Notify the operator that aspects of the surface mining operation require additional modifications to the financial assurance amount or that aspects of the surface mining operation are not in compliance with the approved reclamation plan.
(C)Commence the financial assurance forfeiture process pursuant to Section 2773.1.
(c)If a violation by the operator is confirmed by an inspection either by the lead agency or by the director, the lead agency or the director may take actions pursuant to Section 2774.1 to ensure the violation is corrected. The financial assurance shall not be released until the violation is corrected.
(d)Prior to sending written notification and release of financial assurances pursuant to Section 2773.1, the lead agency shall obtain the written concurrence of the director that the completion of reclamation of the mined land disturbed by the surface mining operation is in accordance with the requirements of the reclamation plan approved by the lead agency.
(e)The board shall promulgate a regulation consistent with this section.
SEC. 6.Section 2774 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.(a)Every lead agency shall adopt ordinances in accordance with state policy that establish procedures for the review and approval of reclamation plans and financial assurances and the issuance of a permit to conduct surface mining operations, except that any lead agency without an active surface mining operation in its jurisdiction may defer adopting an implementing ordinance until the filing of a permit application. The ordinances shall establish procedures requiring at least one public hearing and shall be periodically reviewed by the lead agency and revised, as necessary, to ensure that the ordinances continue to be in accordance with state policy.
(b)Surface mining operations shall be inspected annually, solely to determine whether the surface mining operation is in compliance with its reclamation plan as described in subdivision (c) of Section 2772. The lead agency shall cause an inspection to be conducted by a state licensed geologist, state licensed civil engineer, state licensed landscape architect, state licensed forester, or a lead agency employee who is a mine inspector qualified pursuant to subdivision (i), who is experienced in land reclamation and who has not been employed by a the surface mining operation within the jurisdiction of the lead agency being inspected in any capacity during the previous 12 months, except that a local government lead agency employee who is a qualified mine inspector may inspect its own surface mining operations conducted by another department within the local agency. All inspections shall be conducted using a form developed by the department and approved by the board that includes the professional licensing and disciplinary information of the person who conducted the inspection. The operator shall be solely responsible for the reasonable cost of the inspection. The lead agency or the inspector qualified pursuant to subdivision (i) shall provide a notice of completion of inspection to the director within 90 days of conducting the inspection. The notice shall contain a statement regarding the surface mining operations compliance with its approved reclamation plan, as described in subdivision (c) of Section 2772, a copy of the completed inspection form, and which aspects of the surface mining operations, if any, are inconsistent with its approved reclamation plan, as described in subdivision (c) of Section 2772, and any corrective measures recommended by the inspector. If the surface mining operation has a review of its reclamation plan, financial assurances, or an interim management plan pending under subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (h) of Section 2770, or an appeal pending before the board or lead agency governing body under subdivision (e) or (h) of Section 2770, the notice shall so indicate. The lead agency shall forward to the operator a copy of the notice, a copy of the completed inspection form, and any supporting documentation, including, but not limited to, any inspection report prepared by the geologist, civil engineer, landscape architect, forester, or mine inspector qualified pursuant to subdivision (i) who conducted the inspection.
(c)Before approving a surface mining operations reclamation plan or financial assurances, or any amendments to the reclamation plan and adjustments to financial assurances based on an amendment to a reclamation plan, the lead agency shall submit the plan, assurances, or amendments to the director for review. The plan or amendments shall be submitted to the director as early as practicable in order to facilitate review of the plan pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)). All documentation for that submission shall be submitted to the director at one time. When the lead agency submits a reclamation plan or plan amendments to the director for review, the lead agency shall also submit to the director, for use in reviewing the reclamation plan or plan amendments, information from any prior final related document prepared, adopted, or certified pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)), and shall submit any other pertinent information. The lead agency shall certify to the director that the reclamation plan is considered complete and in substantial compliance with the applicable requirements of this chapter and Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations and the lead agencys mining ordinance in effect at the time that the reclamation plan is submitted to the director for review.
(d)(1)The director shall have 30 days from the date of receipt of a reclamation plan or plan amendments submitted pursuant to subdivision (c), and 45 days from the date of receipt of financial assurances submitted pursuant to subdivision (c), to prepare written comments, if the director so chooses. The lead agency shall evaluate written comments received from the director relating to the reclamation plan, plan amendments, or financial assurances within a reasonable amount of time.
(2)The lead agency shall prepare a written response to the directors comments describing the disposition of the major issues raised by the directors comments, and submit the lead agencys proposed response to the director at least 30 days prior to approval of the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance. The lead agencys response to the directors comments shall describe whether the lead agency proposes to adopt the directors comments to the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance. If the lead agency does not propose to adopt the directors comments, the lead agency shall specify, in detail, why the lead agency proposes not to adopt the comments. Copies of any written comments received and responses prepared by the lead agency shall be forwarded to the operator. The lead agency shall also give the director at least 30 days notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing before the lead agency at which time the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance is scheduled to be approved by the lead agency. If no hearing is required by this chapter, or by the local ordinance, or other state law, then the lead agency shall provide 30 days notice to the director that it intends to approve the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance. The lead agency shall send to the director its final response to the directors comments within 30 days following its approval of the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance, along with final approved copies of those documents, during which period the department retains all powers, duties, and authorities of this chapter.
(3)To the extent there is a conflict between the comments of a trustee agency or a responsible agency that are based on the agencys statutory or regulatory authority and the comments of other commenting agencies that are received by the lead agency pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) regarding a reclamation plan or plan amendments, the lead agency shall consider only the comments of the trustee agency or responsible agency.
(e)(1)If an operator does not request an inspection date on the annual report filed pursuant to Section 2207, or if the lead agency is unable to cause the inspection of a given surface mining operation on the date requested by the operator, the lead agency shall provide the operator with a minimum of 30 days written notice of a pending inspection or a lesser time period if agreed to by the operator.
(2)Within 30 days of an annual inspection being conducted pursuant to this section, each operator shall provide an annual financial assurance cost estimate, on the form developed by the board by regulation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1, to the director and the lead agency for review.
(3)The director shall have 45 days from the date of receipt of the operators annual financial assurance cost estimate to prepare written comments on the operators financial assurances and provide the comments to the lead agency and the operator. The lead agency shall have 30 days from receipt of the directors comments to evaluate the written comments received from the director and provide the director and operator its proposed response to the director. The lead agency shall accept or reject a surface mining operations annual financial assurance cost estimate within 60 days of receipt of the directors comments or the due date of the directors comments if comments are not received. The lead agency shall send to the director its final response to the directors comments within 30 days of its acceptance of the annual financial assurance cost estimate.
(4)If the lead agency determines an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate is inadequate, the lead agency shall specify the reasons for that determination. The operator shall have 30 days to appeal that denial pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2770 or provide a revised financial assurance cost estimate incorporating the suggested changes to the director and the lead agency for approval by the lead agency.
(5)The operator shall provide the director and the lead agency with a revised financial assurances mechanism within 60 days of the lead agencys approval. An operator shall not be required to adjust financial assurances that are in excess of the amount determined necessary to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan provided that financial assurance mechanism remains in effect.
(f)(1)No later than April 1 of each year, the director shall provide each lead agency with a notice listing each active or idle surface mining operation within the lead agencys jurisdiction. For each surface mining operation, the director shall request, request and the lead agency shall provide to the director, on a form provided by the director, no later than July 1 of each year, the following information:
(A)A copy of any permit or reclamation plan amendments, as applicable.
(B)A statement that there have been no changes during the previous year, as applicable.
(C)The date of each surface mining operations last inspection.
(D)The date of each surface mining operations last financial assurance review pursuant to Section 2773.1 for each operation listed.
(2)The director shall request similar information on any new or omitted operations, to be provided to the director no later than July 1 of each year.
(3)The form provided by the director shall include the departments current information for each operation. The notice to each lead agency shall include a statement that failure to file with the director the information requested pursuant to this subdivision may be cause for action pursuant to Section 2774.4.
(g)The review and approval of financial assurances pursuant to this section shall not be considered a project for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
(h)(1)If a surface mining operation is not inspected by the lead agency on the date requested by the operator pursuant to Section 2207 and the operator has not received a 30-day notice of pending inspection from the lead agency as provided in subdivision (e), the operator may send a notice to the lead agency and the director stating the operators intent to have the surface mining operation inspected by a third party who has not been employed in any capacity by the operator in the previous 12 months and who is a state-licensed geologist, state-licensed civil engineer, state-licensed landscape architect, or state-licensed forester who is experienced in land reclamation. An inspector retained by the operator pursuant to this section shall provide the lead agency a 15-day notice of the inspectors intended inspection date for the operation and shall provide a reasonable opportunity for a representative of the lead agency to attend the inspection.
(2)An inspector who inspects a surface mining operation pursuant to this subdivision shall provide the notice of completion of inspection specified in subdivision (b) to the director and the lead agency, whether or not a lead agency representative participated in the inspection. The notice shall include the stamp of the licensed professional who conducted the inspection.
(i)(1)The State Geologist shall coordinate with the director, board, lead agencies, and interested parties to develop a curriculum for the training of mine inspectors. The curriculum shall include, but need not be limited to, all of the following:
(A)Training on determining revegetative success.
(B)Evaluating slopes for signs of instability.
(C)How to properly use the inspection form approved by the board.
(D)The calculation of financial assurances.
(E)Considerations for corrective measures.
(F)Other issues necessary to ensure the consistent inspection of surface mines under this chapter.
(2)Lead agency employees who inspect surface mining operations under this chapter on or before December 31, 2015, shall be deemed qualified mine inspectors for up to two years after the State Geologist has finalized the curriculum pursuant to paragraph (1) and the training has been available to lead agency employees.
(3)A lead agency employee who has completed the training curriculum developed pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be a qualified mine inspector.
(4)Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to affect or impose qualifications or standards on employees designated by a local, state, or federal agency to perform inspections of real property under separate provisions of local, state, or federal law, including, but not limited to, the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code), the federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.), and the Fish and Game Code, notwithstanding the fact that that informational addenda are submitted to lead agencies pursuant to this chapter in addition to reclamation plans, including materials submitted pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 2772.
(5)Absent express authorization under this chapter, mine inspectors shall not inspect operations for the purpose of evaluating compliance with separate provisions of local, state, or federal law, including, but not limited to, the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code), the federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.), and the Fish and Game Code.
SEC. 7.Section 2774.1 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.1.(a)Except as provided in subdivision (i) of Section 2770, if the lead agency or the director determines, based upon an annual inspection pursuant to Section 2774, or otherwise confirmed by an inspection of the mining operation, that a surface mining operation is not in compliance with this chapter, the lead agency or the director may notify the operator of that violation by personal service or certified mail. If the violation extends beyond 30 days after the date of the lead agencys or the directors notification, the lead agency or the director may issue an order by personal service or certified mail requiring the operator to comply with this chapter or, if the operator does not have an approved reclamation plan or financial assurances, cease all further mining activities.
(b)An order issued under subdivision (a) shall not take effect until the operator has been provided a hearing before the lead agency for orders issued by the lead agency, or board for orders issued by the director, concerning the alleged violation. An order issued under subdivision (a) shall specify which aspects of the surface mines activities or operations are inconsistent with this chapter, shall specify a time for compliance that the lead agency or director determines is reasonable, taking into account the seriousness of the violation and any good faith efforts to comply with applicable requirements, and shall set a date for the hearing, which shall not be sooner than 30 days after the date of the order.
(c)An operator who violates or fails to comply with an order issued under subdivision (a) after the orders effective date, as provided in subdivision (b), or who fails to submit a report to the director or lead agency as required by Section 2207, shall be subject to an order by the lead agency or the director imposing an administrative penalty of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) per day, assessed from the original date of noncompliance with this chapter or Section 2207. The penalty may be imposed administratively by the lead agency or the director. In determining the amount of the administrative penalty, the lead agency or the director shall take into consideration the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation or violations, any prior history of violations, the degree of culpability, economic savings, if any, resulting from the violation, and any other matters justice may require. Orders setting administrative penalties shall become effective upon issuance of the order and payment shall be made to the lead agency or the director within 30 days, unless the operator petitions the legislative body of the lead agency, the board, or the superior court for review as provided in Section 2774.2. An order shall be served by personal service or by certified mail upon the operator. Penalties collected by the director shall not be used for purposes other than to cover the reasonable costs incurred by the director in implementing this chapter or Section 2207.
(d)If the lead agency or the director determines that the surface mine is not in compliance with this chapter, so that the surface mine presents an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or the environment, the lead agency or the Attorney General, on behalf of the director, may seek an order from a court of competent jurisdiction enjoining that operation.
(e)Upon a complaint by the director, the department, or the board, the Attorney General may bring an action to recover administrative penalties under this section, and penalties under Section 2207, in any court of competent jurisdiction in this state against any person violating any provision of this chapter or Section 2207, or any regulation adopted pursuant to this chapter or Section 2207. The Attorney General may bring this action on his or her own initiative if, after examining the complaint and the evidence, he or she believes a violation has occurred. The Attorney General may also seek an order from a court of competent jurisdiction compelling the operator to comply with this chapter and Section 2207.
(f)(1)The lead agency has primary responsibility for enforcing this chapter and Section 2207. In cases where the board is not the lead agency pursuant to Section 2774.4, enforcement actions may be initiated by the director pursuant to this section only after the violation has come to the attention of the director and either of the following occurs:
(A)The lead agency has been notified by the director in writing of the violation for at least 30 days, and has not taken appropriate enforcement action, which may include failing to issue an order to comply within a reasonable time after issuing a notice of violation.
(B)The director determines that there is a violation that amounts to an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or safety, or to the environment.
(2)The director shall comply with this section in initiating enforcement actions.
(g)In exercising enforcement authority pursuant to this section, the lead agency, the director, or the board, as appropriate, shall take into account and seek to minimize the impact of any proposed enforcement action on the number of existing jobs supported directly or indirectly by the surface mining operation.
(h)Remedies under this section are in addition to, and do not supersede or limit, any and all other remedies, civil or criminal.
SEC. 8.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
(a)The owner or the operator of a mining operation within the state shall forward to the director annually, not later than a date established by the director, upon forms approved by the board from time to time, a report that identifies and contains all of the following:
(1)The name, address, and telephone number of the person, company, or other owner of the mining operation.
(2)The name, address, and telephone number of a designated agent who resides in this state, and who will receive and accept service of all orders, notices, and processes of the lead agency, board, director, or court.
(3)The location of the mining operation, its name, its mine number as issued by the Bureau of Mines Office of Mine Reclamation or the director, its section, township, range, latitude, longitude, and approximate boundaries of the mining operation marked on a United States Geological Survey 71/2-minute or 15-minute quadrangle map.
(4)The lead agency.
(5)The approval date of the mining operations reclamation plan.
(6)The mining operations status as active, idle, reclaimed, or in the process of being reclaimed.
(7)The commodities produced by the mine and the type of mining operation.
(8)Proof of annual inspection by the lead agency.
(8)A copy of the previously completed annual inspection form and a requested date for the next annual inspection by the lead agency.
(9)Proof of financial assurances.
(10)Ownership of the property, including government agencies, if applicable, by the assessors parcel number, and total assessed value of the mining operation.
(11)The approximate permitted size of the mining operation subject to Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), in acres.
(12)The approximate total acreage of land newly disturbed by the mining operation during the previous calendar year.
(13)The approximate total of disturbed acreage reclaimed during the previous calendar year.
(14)The approximate total unreclaimed disturbed acreage remaining as of the end of the calendar year.
(15)The total production for each mineral commodity produced during the previous year.
(16)A copy of any approved reclamation plan and any amendments or conditions of approval to any existing reclamation plan approved by the lead agency.
(b)(1)Every year, not later than the date established by the director, the person submitting the report pursuant to subdivision (a) shall forward to the lead agency, upon forms furnished by the board, a report that provides all of the information specified in paragraphs (1) to (16), inclusive, of subdivision (a).
(2)The owner or operator of a mining operation shall allow access to the property to any governmental agency or the agent of any company providing financial assurances in connection with the reclamation plan, plan in order that the reclamation can be carried out by the entity or company, in accordance with the provisions of the reclamation plan.
(c)Subsequent reports shall include only changes in the information submitted for the items described in subdivision (a), except that, instead of the approved reclamation plan, the reports shall include any reclamation plan amendments approved during the previous year. The reports shall state whether review of a reclamation plan, financial assurances, or an interim management plan is pending under subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (h) of Section 2770, or whether an appeal before the board or lead agency governing body is pending under subdivision (e) or (h) of Section 2770. The director shall notify the person submitting the report and the owners designated agent in writing that the report and the fee required pursuant to subdivision (d) have been received, specify the mining operations mine number if one has not been issued by the Bureau of Mines, Office of Mine Reclamation, and notify the person and agent of any deficiencies in the report within 90 days of receipt. That person or agent shall have 30 days from receipt of the notification to correct the noted deficiencies and forward the revised reports report to the director and the lead agency. Any person who fails to comply with this section, or knowingly provides incorrect or false information in reports required by this section, may be subject to an administrative penalty as provided in subdivision (c) of Section 2774.1.
(d)(1)The board shall impose, by regulation, pursuant to paragraph (2), an annual reporting fee on, and method for collecting annual fees from, each active or idle mining operation. The maximum fee for any single mining operation may not exceed four thousand dollars ($4,000) annually and may not be less than one hundred dollars ($100) annually, as adjusted for the cost of living as measured by the California Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers, calendar year averages, using the percentage change in the previous year, beginning with the 200506 fiscal year and annually thereafter.
(2)(A)The board shall adopt, by regulation, a schedule of fees authorized under paragraph (1) to cover the departments cost in carrying out this section and Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), as reflected in the Governors proposed Budget, and may adopt those regulations as emergency regulations. In establishing the schedule of fees to be paid by each active and idle mining operation, the fees shall be calculated on an equitable basis reflecting the size and type of operation. The board shall also consider the total assessed value of the mining operation, the acreage disturbed by mining activities, and the acreage subject to the reclamation plan.
(B)Regulations adopted pursuant to this subdivision shall be adopted by the board in accordance with Chapter the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. Code). The adoption of any emergency regulations pursuant to this subdivision shall be considered necessary to address an emergency and shall be considered by the Office of Administrative Law to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, and general welfare.
(3)The total revenue generated by the reporting fees may not exceed, and may be less than, the amount of three million five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000), as adjusted for the cost of living as measured by the California Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers, calendar year averages, using the percentage change in the previous year, beginning with the 200506 fiscal year and annually thereafter. If the director determines that the revenue collected during the preceding fiscal year was greater or less than the cost to operate the program, the board shall adjust the fees to compensate for the overcollection or undercollection of revenues.
(4)(A)The reporting fees established pursuant to this subdivision shall be deposited in the Mine Reclamation Account, which is hereby created. Any fees, penalties, interest, fines, or charges collected by the director or board pursuant to this chapter or Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710) shall be deposited in the Mine Reclamation Account. The money in the account shall be available to the department and board, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purpose of carrying out this section and complying with Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710), which includes, but is not limited to, classification and designation of areas with mineral resources of statewide or regional significance, reclamation plan and financial assurance review, mine inspection, and enforcement.
(B)(i)In addition to reporting fees, the board shall collect five dollars ($5) per ounce of gold and ten cents ($0.10) per ounce of silver mined within the state and shall deposit the fees collected in the Abandoned Mine Reclamation and Minerals Fund Subaccount, which is hereby created in the Mine Reclamation Account. The department may expend the moneys in the subaccount, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for only the purposes of Section 2796.5 and as authorized herein for the remediation of abandoned mines.
(ii)Notwithstanding subdivision (j) of Section 2796.5, fees collected pursuant to clause (i) may also be used to remediate features of historic abandoned mines and lands that they impact. For the purposes of this section, historic abandoned mines are mines for which operations have been conducted before January 1, 1976, and include, but are not limited to, historic gold and silver mines.
(5)In case of late payment of the reporting fee, a penalty of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) or 10 percent of the amount due, whichever is greater, plus interest at the rate of 11/2 percent per month, computed from the delinquent date of the assessment until and including the date of payment, shall be assessed. New mining operations that have not submitted a report shall submit a report prior to commencement of operations. The new operation shall submit its fee according to the reasonable fee schedule adopted by the board, and the month that the report is received shall become that operations anniversary month.
(e)The lead agency, or the board when acting as the lead agency, may impose a fee upon each mining operation to cover the reasonable costs incurred in implementing this chapter and Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2710).
(f)For purposes of this section, mining operation means a mining operation of any kind or character whatever in this state, including, but not limited to, a mining operation that is classified as a surface mining operation as defined in Section 2735, unless excepted by Section 2714. For the purposes of fee collections only, mining operation may include one or more mines operated by a single operator or mining company on one or more sites, if the total annual combined mineral production for all sites is less than 100 troy ounces for precious metals, if precious metals are the primary mineral commodity produced, or less than 100,000 short tons if the primary mineral commodity produced is not precious metals.
(g)Any information in reports submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) that includes or otherwise indicates the total mineral production, reserves, or rate of depletion of any mining operation may not be disclosed to any member of the public, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 6252 of the Government Code. Other portions of the reports are public records unless excepted by statute. Statistical bulletins based on these reports and published under Section 2205 shall be compiled to show, for the state as a whole and separately for each lead agency, the total of each mineral produced therein. In order not to disclose the production, reserves, or rate of depletion from any identifiable mining operation, no production figure shall be published or otherwise disclosed unless that figure is the aggregated production of not less than three mining operations. If the production figure for any lead agency would disclose the production, reserves, or rate of depletion of less than three mining operations or otherwise permit the reasonable inference of the production, reserves, or rate of depletion of any identifiable mining operation, that figure shall be combined with the same figure of not less than two other lead agencies without regard to the location of the lead agencies. The bulletin shall be published annually by June 30 or as soon thereafter as practicable.
(h)The approval of a form by the board pursuant to this section is not the adoption of a regulation for purposes of Chapter the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code Code) and is not subject to that chapter. act.
SEC. 2.Section 2717 of the Public Resources Code, as amended by Section 2 of Chapter 417 of the Statutes of 2013, is amended to read:2717.(a)Notwithstanding Section 10231.5 of the Government Code, the board shall submit to the Legislature on December 1 of each year a report on the actions taken pursuant to this chapter during the preceding fiscal year. The report shall include a statement of the actions, including legislative recommendations, that are necessary to carry out more completely the purposes and requirements of this chapter.
(b)For the purposes of ensuring compliance with Sections 10295.5 and 20676 of the Public Contract Code, the department shall, at a minimum, quarterly publish in the California Regulatory Notice Register, or otherwise make available upon request to the Department of General Services or any other state or local agency, a list identifying all of the following:
(1)Surface mining operations for which a report is required and has been submitted pursuant to Section 2207 that indicates all of the following:
(A)The reclamation plan and financial assurances have been approved pursuant to this chapter.
(B)Compliance with state reclamation standards developed pursuant to Section 2773.
(C)Compliance with the financial assurance guidelines developed pursuant to Section 2773.1.
(D)The Whether the annual reporting fee has been submitted to the Department of Conservation. department.
(2)Surface mining operations for which an appeal is pending before the board pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2770, if the appeal was not pending before the board for more than 180 days.
(3)Surface mining operations for which an inspection is required and for which an inspection notice has been submitted by the lead agency pursuant to Section 2774 that indicates both compliance with the approved reclamation plan and that sufficient financial assurances, pursuant to Section 2773.1, have been approved and secured.
(4)Surface mining operations that meet all of the following:
(A)The reclamation plan has been approved and is in compliance with this chapter.
(B)The mining operation is in compliance with either of the following:
(i)The approved reclamation plan.
(ii)An order to comply issued prior to January 1, 2019, pursuant to this chapter and that is being complied with by the operator. An order to comply may be stipulated to as follows:
(I)By the department, lead agency, and operator if the enforcement action was initiated by the director.
(II)By the lead agency and the operator, with notice of the stipulation provided to the director if the enforcement action was initiated by the lead agency.
(C)In accordance with Section 2773.1 and Article 11 (commencing with Section 3800) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, as amended, the surface mining operation has an approved financial assurance in place that is adequate for reclamation pursuant to the approved reclamation plan.
(c)Between July 1, 2017, and January 1, 2018, the department shall submit to the Legislature a report on the activities of lead agencies and surface mining operations. This report shall include, but is need not be limited to, all of the following:
(1)Number of financial assurance cost estimates reviewed and approved each year by each lead agency.
(2)Number of annual mine inspections performed by each lead agency.
(3)Information on idle mines and interim management plans approved by each lead agency.
(4)Number and location of mining operations that are no longer in operation with no intent to resume and are in the process of reclamation and how many years each of these mining operations has claimed that status.
(5)Information on approved mineral resources management plans across the state from the board.
(6)Number and location of mines with reclamation plans approved prior to the adoption of the 1993 reclamation standards.
(7)Percentage of mining operations on the list published pursuant to subdivision (b) and the number and location of mining operations that have been placed on the list pursuant to clause (ii) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (b).
(8)Number of historic abandoned mines remediated by the department and the locations of known remaining hazards.
(9)Number, types, and status of notices of violations and orders to comply issued by the department organized by location.
(10)Number of administrative penalties issued by the department and amounts, as well as information on the amounts actually collected by the department organized by location.
(d)A report submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) or (c) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.
(e)This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2019, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2019, deletes or extends that date.
SEC. 3.Section 2717 of the Public Resources Code, as added by Section 3 of Chapter 417 of the Statutes of 2013, is repealed.2717.(a)Notwithstanding Section 10231.5 of the Government Code, the board shall submit to the Legislature on December 1 of each year a report on the actions taken pursuant to this chapter during the preceding fiscal year. The report shall include a statement of the actions, including legislative recommendations, that are necessary to carry out more completely the purposes and requirements of this chapter.
(b)For purposes of ensuring compliance with Sections 10295.5 and 20676 of the Public Contract Code, the department shall, at a minimum, quarterly publish in the California Regulatory Notice Register, or otherwise make available upon request to the Department of General Services or any other state or local agency, a list identifying all of the following:
(1)Surface mining operations for which a report is required and has been submitted pursuant to Section 2207 that indicates all of the following:
(A)The reclamation plan and financial assurances have been approved pursuant to this chapter.
(B)Compliance with state reclamation standards developed pursuant to Section 2773.
(C)Compliance with the financial assurance guidelines developed pursuant to Section 2773.1.
(D)The annual reporting fee has been submitted to the Department of Conservation.
(2)Surface mining operations for which an appeal is pending before the board pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2770, if the appeal was not pending before the board for more than 180 days.
(3)Surface mining operations for which an inspection is required and for which an inspection notice has been submitted by the lead agency pursuant to Section 2774 that indicates both compliance with the approved reclamation plan and that sufficient financial assurances, pursuant to Section 2773.1, have been approved and secured.
(4)Surface mining operations to which an order to comply was issued pursuant to this chapter prior to January 1, 2019, and that is being complied with. An order to comply may have been stipulated to as follows:
(A)By the department, lead agency, and operator if the enforcement action was initiated by the director.
(B)By the lead agency and the operator, with notice of the stipulation provided to the director if the enforcement action was initiated by the lead agency.
(c)A report submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.
(d)This section shall become operative January 1, 2019.
SEC. 4.Section 2773.1 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2773.1.(a)Lead agencies shall require financial assurances of each surface mining operation to ensure reclamation is performed in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan, as follows:
(1)Financial assurances may take the form of surety bonds executed by an admitted surety insurer, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 995.120 of the Code of Civil Procedure, irrevocable letters of credit, trust funds, or other forms of financial assurances specified by the board pursuant to subdivision (e), which that the lead agency reasonably determines are adequate to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan.
(2)The financial assurances shall remain in effect for the duration of the surface mining operation and any additional period until reclamation is completed.
(3)The amount of financial assurances required of a surface mining operation for any one year shall be reviewed and, if necessary, adjusted annually once each calendar year to account for new lands disturbed by surface mining operations, inflation, and reclamation of lands accomplished in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. An operator shall not be required to adjust financial assurances that are in excess of the amount determined necessary to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan.
(4)Financial assurance cost estimates shall be submitted to the lead agency for review on the form adopted by the board by regulation pursuant to subdivision (f). The estimates shall include estimates of the time needed to complete reclamation of the mine in accordance with the approved reclamation plan, including, but not limited to, any monitoring studies required by the reclamation plan.
(4)
(5)The financial assurances shall be made payable to the lead agency and the department. Financial assurances that were approved by the lead agency prior to January 1, 1993, and were made payable to the State Geologist shall be considered payable to the department for purposes of this chapter. However, if a surface mining operation has received approval of its financial assurances from a public agency other than the lead agency, the lead agency shall deem those financial assurances adequate for purposes of this section, or shall credit them toward fulfillment of the financial assurances required by this section, if they are made payable to the public agency, the lead agency, and the department and otherwise meet the requirements of this section. In any event, if a lead agency and one or more public agencies exercise jurisdiction over a surface mining operation, the total amount of financial assurances required by the lead agency and the public agencies for any one year shall not exceed that amount which that is necessary to perform reclamation of lands remaining disturbed. For purposes of this paragraph, a public agency may include a federal agency.
(b)If the lead agency or the board, following a public hearing, determines that the operator is financially incapable of performing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan, or has abandoned its surface mining operation without commencing reclamation, either the lead agency or the director shall do all of the following:
(1)Notify the operator by personal service or certified mail that the lead agency or the director intends to take appropriate action to forfeit the financial assurances and specify the reasons for so doing.
(2)Allow the operator 60 days to commence or cause the commencement of reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan and require that reclamation be completed within the time limits specified in the approved reclamation plan or some other time period mutually agreed upon by the lead agency or the director and the operator.
(3)Proceed to take appropriate action to require forfeiture of the financial assurances if the operator does not substantially comply with paragraph (2).
(4)Use the proceeds from the forfeited financial assurances to conduct and complete reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. In no event shall the The financial assurances shall not be used for any other purpose. The operator is responsible for the costs of conducting and completing reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan which that are in excess of the proceeds from the forfeited financial assurances.
(c)Financial assurances shall no longer be required of a surface mining operation, and shall be released, upon written notification by the lead agency, which shall be forwarded to the operator and the director, that reclamation has been completed in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. If a mining operation is sold or ownership is transferred to another person, the existing financial assurances shall remain in force and shall not be released by the lead agency until new financial assurances are secured from the new owner and have been approved by the lead agency in accordance with Section 2770.
(d)The lead agency shall have primary responsibility to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and to reclaim mine sites under subdivision (b). However, in cases where the board is not the lead agency pursuant to Section 2774.4, the director may act to seek forfeiture of financial assurances and reclaim mine sites pursuant to subdivision (b) only if both of the following occurs:
(1)The financial incapability of the operator or the abandonment of the mining operation has come to the attention of the director.
(2)The lead agency has been notified in writing by the director of the financial incapability of the operator or the abandonment of the mining operation for at least 15 days, and the lead agency has not taken appropriate measures to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances and reclaim the mine site; site, and one of the following has occurred:
(A)The lead agency has been notified in writing by the director that failure to take appropriate measures to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances or to reclaim the mine site shall result in actions being taken against the lead agency under Section 2774.4.
(B)The director determines that there is a violation that amounts to an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health, safety, or to the environment.
(C)The lead agency notifies the director in writing that its good faith attempts to seek forfeiture of the financial assurances have not been successful.
The director shall comply with subdivision (b) in seeking forfeiture of financial assurances and reclaiming mine sites.
(e)The board may adopt regulations specifying financial assurance mechanisms other than surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, and trust funds, which the board determines are reasonably available and adequate to ensure reclamation pursuant to this chapter, but these mechanisms may shall not include financial tests, or surety bonds executed by one or more personal sureties. These mechanisms may include reclamation bond pool programs.
(f)On or before March 1, 1993, the board shall adopt guidelines to implement this section. The guidelines are exempt from the requirements of Chapter the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, Code), and are not subject to review by the Office of Administrative Law.
SEC. 5.Section 2773.11 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:2773.11.(a)Prior to the modification of the amount of a financial assurance or the full or partial release of the financial assurance instrument to which both the lead agency and the department are cobeneficiaries pursuant to Section 2773.1, the lead agency shall provide to the director all of the following documents at one time:
(1)An inspection report, prepared by a qualified person pursuant to Section 2774, indicating that there are aspects of the surface mining operation that require modification of the existing financial assurance amount or stating that the mined land has been reclaimed in full or in part, as the case may be, in accordance with the approved reclamation plan.
(2)A revised financial assurance cost estimate prepared by the operator and accepted by the lead agency, or prepared by the lead agency pursuant to Section 2773.1, with supporting documentation that indicates the specific cost changes to the existing financial assurance amount, or that indicates there are no further outstanding reclamation liabilities to be included in the financial assurance.
(3)A statement by the lead agency, with supporting documentation that may include the most recent inspection report and any geological and engineering reports prepared as part of the inspection report, that the mined land remains subject to a financial assurance as modified or that the mined land has been reclaimed in accordance with the approved reclamation plan, that there are no outstanding reclamation liabilities, and recommending to the director that the financial assurance be released.
(4)The director shall review and comment on the documents within 45 days from the date of receipt of the documents, pursuant to Section 2774. The director shall inspect the surface mining operation if the director determines it necessary pursuant to Section 2774.1 and shall do any of the following:
(A)Notify the lead agency of the directors concurrence that the modified financial assurance amount is adequate or that there are no outstanding reclamation liabilities on the mined land and that the original financial assurance should be released in full or in part pursuant to Section 2773.1, at which time the financial assurance shall be released.
(B)Notify the lead agency that the director has found, based on an inspection, aspects of the surface mining operation that require additional modifications to the financial assurance amount or aspects that are not in compliance with the approved reclamation plan.
(C)Commence the financial assurance forfeiture process pursuant to Section 2773.1.
(b)(1)An operator may request the lead agency and the director jointly to inspect and review a request for full or partial release of a financial assurance instrument. Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the operator may submit a request for a joint inspection and review to the lead agency and the director along with the surface mining operations most recent inspection report, a revised financial assurance cost estimate, and other supporting documentation.
(2)The lead agency and the director shall conduct a joint inspection for the purpose of evaluating the operators request within 90 days after receipt of the operators request.
(3)Within 45 days after completion of the joint inspection, the lead agency and the director shall do any of the following:
(A)Notify the operator the modified financial assurance amount is adequate or that there are no outstanding reclamation liabilities on the mined land and that the original financial assurance should be released in full or in part pursuant to Section 2773.1, at which time the financial assurance shall be released.
(B)Notify the operator that aspects of the surface mining operation require additional modifications to the financial assurance amount or that aspects of the surface mining operation are not in compliance with the approved reclamation plan.
(C)Commence the financial assurance forfeiture process pursuant to Section 2773.1.
(c)If a violation by the operator is confirmed by an inspection either by the lead agency or by the director, the lead agency or the director may take actions pursuant to Section 2774.1 to ensure the violation is corrected. The financial assurance shall not be released until the violation is corrected.
(d)Prior to sending written notification and release of financial assurances pursuant to Section 2773.1, the lead agency shall obtain the written concurrence of the director that the completion of reclamation of the mined land disturbed by the surface mining operation is in accordance with the requirements of the reclamation plan approved by the lead agency.
(e)The board shall promulgate a regulation consistent with this section.
SEC. 6.Section 2774 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.(a)Every lead agency shall adopt ordinances in accordance with state policy that establish procedures for the review and approval of reclamation plans and financial assurances and the issuance of a permit to conduct surface mining operations, except that any lead agency without an active surface mining operation in its jurisdiction may defer adopting an implementing ordinance until the filing of a permit application. The ordinances shall establish procedures requiring at least one public hearing and shall be periodically reviewed by the lead agency and revised, as necessary, to ensure that the ordinances continue to be in accordance with state policy.
(b)The lead agency shall conduct an inspection of a surface mining operation within six months of receipt by the lead agency of the surface mining operations report submitted pursuant to Section 2207, Surface mining operations shall be inspected annually, solely to determine whether the surface mining operation is in compliance with this chapter. In no event shall a lead agency inspect a surface mining operation less than once in any calendar year. its reclamation plan as described in subdivision (c) of Section 2772. The lead agency may shall cause an inspection to be conducted by a state licensed geologist, state licensed civil engineer, state licensed landscape architect, or state licensed forester, or a lead agency employee who is a mine inspector qualified pursuant to subdivision (i), who is experienced in land reclamation and who has not been employed by a surface mining operation within the jurisdiction of the lead agency in any capacity during the previous 12 months, except that a local government may inspect its own surface mining operations. All inspections shall be conducted using a form developed by the department and approved by the board that shall include includes the professional licensing and disciplinary information of the person who conducted the inspection. The operator shall be solely responsible for the reasonable cost of the inspection. The lead agency or the inspector qualified pursuant to subdivision (i) shall notify the director within 30 days of the date of completion of the inspection that the inspection has been conducted provide a notice of completion of inspection to the director within 90 days of conducting the inspection. The notice shall contain a statement regarding the surface mining operations compliance with this chapter, shall include its approved reclamation plan, as described in subdivision (c) of Section 2772, a copy of the completed inspection form, and shall specify which aspects of the surface mining operations, if any, are inconsistent with this chapter its approved reclamation plan, as described in subdivision (c) of Section 2772, and any corrective measures recommended by the inspector. If the surface mining operation has a review of its reclamation plan, financial assurances, or an interim management plan pending under subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (h) of Section 2770, or an appeal pending before the board or lead agency governing body under subdivision (e) or (h) of Section 2770, the notice shall so indicate. The lead agency shall forward to the operator a copy of the notice, a copy of the completed inspection form, and any supporting documentation, including, but not limited to, any inspection report prepared by the geologist, civil engineer, landscape architect, or forester, or mine inspector qualified pursuant to subdivision (i) who conducted the inspection.
(c)Before approving a surface mining operations reclamation plan, plan or financial assurances, including existing financial assurances reviewed by the lead agency pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 2770, or any amendments to the reclamation plan and adjustments to financial assurances based on an amendment to a reclamation plan, the lead agency shall submit the plan, assurances, or amendments to the director for review. The plan or amendments shall be submitted to the director as early as practicable in order to facilitate review of the plan pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)). All documentation for that submission shall be submitted to the director at one time. When the lead agency submits a reclamation plan or plan amendments to the director for review, the lead agency shall also submit to the director, for use in reviewing the reclamation plan or plan amendments, information from any prior final related document prepared, adopted, or certified pursuant to Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)), and shall submit any other pertinent information. The lead agency shall certify to the director that the reclamation plan is considered complete and in substantial compliance with the applicable requirements of this chapter and Article 1 (commencing with Section 3500) of Chapter 8 of Division 2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations and the lead agencys mining ordinance in effect at the time that the reclamation plan is submitted to the director for review.
(d)(1)The director shall have 30 days from the date of receipt of a reclamation plan or plan amendments submitted pursuant to subdivision (c), and 45 days from the date of receipt of financial assurances submitted pursuant to subdivision (c), to prepare written comments, if the director so chooses. The lead agency shall evaluate written comments received from the director relating to the reclamation plan, plan amendments, or financial assurances within a reasonable amount of time.
(2)The lead agency shall prepare a written response to the directors comments describing the disposition of the major issues raised by the directors comments, and submit the lead agencys proposed response to the director at least 30 days prior to approval of the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance. The lead agencys response to the directors comments shall describe whether the lead agency proposes to adopt the directors comments to the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance. If the lead agency does not propose to adopt the directors comments, the lead agency shall specify, in detail, why the lead agency proposes not to adopt the comments. Copies of any written comments received and responses prepared by the lead agency shall be forwarded to the operator. The lead agency shall also give the director at least 30 days notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing before the lead agency at which time the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance is scheduled to be approved by the lead agency. If no hearing is required by this chapter, or by the local ordinance, or other state law, then the lead agency shall provide 30 days notice to the director that it intends to approve the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance. The lead agency shall send to the director its final response to the directors comments within 30 days following its approval of the reclamation plan, plan amendment, or financial assurance, along with final approved copies of those documents, during which period the department retains all powers, duties, and authorities of this chapter.
(3)To the extent that there is a conflict between the comments of a trustee agency or a responsible agency that are based on the agencys statutory or regulatory authority and the comments of other commenting agencies which that are received by the lead agency pursuant to Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)) regarding a reclamation plan or plan amendments, the lead agency shall consider only the comments of the trustee agency or responsible agency.
(e)A lead agency shall notify the director of the filing of an application for a permit to conduct surface mining operations within 30 days of an application being filed with the lead agency. By July 1, 1991, each lead agency shall submit to the director for every active or idle mining operation within its jurisdiction, a copy of the mining permit required pursuant to Section 2774, and any conditions or amendments to those permits. By July 1 of each subsequent year, the lead agency shall submit to the director for each active or idle mining operation a copy of any permit or reclamation plan amendments, as applicable, or a statement that there have been no changes during the previous year. Failure to file with the director the information required under this section shall be cause for action under Section 2774.4.
(e)(1)If an operator does not request an inspection date on the annual report filed pursuant to Section 2207, or if the lead agency is unable to cause the inspection of a given surface mining operation on the date requested by the operator, the lead agency shall provide the operator with a minimum of 30 days written notice of a pending inspection or a lesser time period if agreed to by the operator.
(2)Within 30 days of an annual inspection being conducted pursuant to this section, each operator shall provide an annual financial assurance cost estimate, on the form developed by the board by regulation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 2773.1, to the director and the lead agency for review.
(3)The director shall have 45 days from the date of receipt of the operators annual financial assurance cost estimate to prepare written comments on the operators financial assurances and provide the comments to the lead agency and the operator. The lead agency shall have 30 days from receipt of the directors comments to evaluate the written comments received from the director and provide the director and operator its proposed response to the director. The lead agency shall accept or reject a surface mining operations annual financial assurance cost estimate within 60 days of receipt of the directors comments or the due date of the directors comments if comments are not received. The lead agency shall send to the director its final response to the directors comments within 30 days of its acceptance of the annual financial assurance cost estimate.
(4)If the lead agency determines an operators annual financial assurance cost estimate is inadequate, the lead agency shall specify the reasons for that determination. The operator shall have 30 days to appeal that denial pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 2770 or provide a revised financial assurance cost estimate incorporating the suggested changes to the director and the lead agency for approval by the lead agency.
(5)The operator shall provide the director and the lead agency with a revised financial assurances mechanism within 60 days of the lead agencys approval. An operator shall not be required to adjust financial assurances that are in excess of the amount determined necessary to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operations approved reclamation plan provided that financial assurance mechanism remains in effect.
(f)(1)No later than April 1 of each year, the director shall provide each lead agency with a notice listing each active or idle surface mining operation within the lead agencys jurisdiction. For each surface mining operation, the director shall request, and the lead agency shall provide to the director, on a form provided by the director, no later than July 1 of each year, the following information:
(A)A copy of any permit or reclamation plan amendments, as applicable.
(B)A statement that there have been no changes during the previous year, as applicable.
(C)The date of each surface mining operations last inspection.
(D)The date of each surface mining operations last financial assurance review pursuant to Section 2773.1 for each operation listed.
(2)The director shall request similar information on any new or omitted operations, to be provided to the director no later than July 1 of each year.
(3)The form provided by the director shall include the departments current information for each operation. The notice to each lead agency shall include a statement that failure to file with the director the information requested pursuant to this subdivision may be cause for action pursuant to Section 2774.4.
(g)The review and approval of financial assurances pursuant to this section shall not be considered a project for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)).
(h)(1)If a surface mining operation is not inspected by the lead agency on the date requested by the operator pursuant to Section 2207 and the operator has not received a 30-day notice of pending inspection from the lead agency as provided in subdivision (e), the operator may send a notice to the lead agency and the director stating the operators intent to have the surface mining operation inspected by a third party who has not been employed in any capacity by the operator in the previous 12 months and who is a state-licensed geologist, state-licensed civil engineer, state-licensed landscape architect, or state-licensed forester who is experienced in land reclamation. An inspector retained by the operator pursuant to this section shall provide the lead agency a 15-day notice of the inspectors intended inspection date for the operation and shall provide a reasonable opportunity for a representative of the lead agency to attend the inspection.
(2)An inspector who inspects a surface mining operation pursuant to this subdivision shall provide the notice of completion of inspection specified in subdivision (b) to the director and the lead agency, whether or not a lead agency representative participated in the inspection. The notice shall include the stamp of the licensed professional who conducted the inspection.
(i)(1)The State Geologist shall coordinate with the director, board, lead agencies, and interested parties to develop a curriculum for the training of mine inspectors. The curriculum shall include, but need not be limited to, all of the following:
(A)Training on determining revegetative success.
(B)Evaluating slopes for signs of instability.
(C)How to properly use the inspection form approved by the board.
(D)The calculation of financial assurances.
(E)Considerations for corrective measures.
(F)Other issues necessary to ensure the consistent inspection of surface mines under this chapter.
(2)Lead agency employees who inspect surface mining operations under this chapter on or before December 31, 2015, shall be deemed qualified mine inspectors for up to two years after the State Geologist has finalized the curriculum pursuant to paragraph (1) and the training has been available to lead agency employees.
(3)A lead agency employee who has completed the training curriculum developed pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be a qualified mine inspector.
(4)Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to affect or impose qualifications or standards on employees designated by a local, state, or federal agency to perform inspections of real property under separate provisions of local, state, or federal law, including, but not limited to, the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code), the federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.), and the Fish and Game Code, notwithstanding the fact that that informational addenda are submitted to lead agencies pursuant to this chapter in addition to reclamation plans, including materials submitted pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 2772.
(5)Absent express authorization under this chapter, mine inspectors shall not inspect operations for the purpose of evaluating compliance with separate provisions of local, state, or federal law, including, but not limited to, the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code), the federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.), and the Fish and Game Code.
SEC. 7.Section 2774.1 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:2774.1.(a)Except as provided in subdivision (i) of Section 2770, if the lead agency or the director determines, based upon an annual inspection pursuant to Section 2774, or otherwise confirmed by an inspection of the mining operation, that a surface mining operation is not in compliance with this chapter, the lead agency or the director may notify the operator of that violation by personal service or certified mail. If the violation extends beyond 30 days after the date of the lead agencys or the directors notification, the lead agency or the director may issue an order by personal service or certified mail requiring the operator to comply with this chapter or, if the operator does not have an approved reclamation plan or financial assurances, cease all further mining activities.
(b)An order issued under subdivision (a) shall not take effect until the operator has been provided a hearing before the lead agency for orders issued by the lead agency, or board for orders issued by the director, concerning the alleged violation. An order issued under subdivision (a) shall specify which aspects of the surface mines activities or operations are inconsistent with this chapter, shall specify a time for compliance that the lead agency or director determines is reasonable, taking into account the seriousness of the violation and any good faith efforts to comply with applicable requirements, and shall set a date for the hearing, which shall not be sooner than 30 days after the date of the order.
(c)An operator who violates or fails to comply with an order issued under subdivision (a) after the orders effective date, as provided in subdivision (b), or who fails to submit a report to the director or lead agency as required by Section 2207, shall be subject to an order by the lead agency or the director imposing an administrative penalty of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) per day, assessed from the original date of noncompliance with this chapter or Section 2207. The penalty may be imposed administratively by the lead agency or the director. In determining the amount of the administrative penalty, the lead agency or the director shall take into consideration the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation or violations, any prior history of violations, the degree of culpability, economic savings, if any, resulting from the violation, and any other matters justice may require. Orders setting administrative penalties shall become effective upon issuance of the order and payment shall be made to the lead agency or the director within 30 days, unless the operator petitions the legislative body of the lead agency, the board, or the superior court for review as provided in Section 2774.2. An order shall be served by personal service or by certified mail upon the operator. Penalties collected by the director shall not be used for purposes other than to cover the reasonable costs incurred by the director in implementing this chapter or Section 2207.
(d)If the lead agency or the director determines that the surface mine is not in compliance with this chapter, so that the surface mine presents an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or the environment, the lead agency or the Attorney General, on behalf of the director, may seek an order from a court of competent jurisdiction enjoining that operation.
(e)Upon a complaint by the director, the department, or the board, the Attorney General may bring an action to recover administrative penalties under this section, and penalties under Section 2207, in any court of competent jurisdiction in this state against any person violating any provision of this chapter or Section 2207, or any regulation adopted pursuant to this chapter or Section 2207. The Attorney General may bring this action on his or her own initiative if, after examining the complaint and the evidence, he or she believes a violation has occurred. The Attorney General may also seek an order from a court of competent jurisdiction compelling the operator to comply with this chapter and Section 2207.
(f)(1)The lead agency has primary responsibility for enforcing this chapter and Section 2207. In cases where the board is not the lead agency pursuant to Section 2774.4, enforcement actions may be initiated by the director pursuant to this section only after the violation has come to the attention of the director and either of the following occurs:
(A)The lead agency has been notified by the director in writing of the violation for at least 30 days, and has not taken appropriate enforcement action, which may include failing to issue an order to comply within a reasonable time after issuing a notice of violation.
(B)The director determines that there is a violation that amounts to an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or safety, or to the environment.
(2)The director shall comply with this section in initiating enforcement actions.
(g)In exercising enforcement authority pursuant to this section, the lead agency, the director, or the board, as appropriate, shall take into account and seek to minimize the impact of any proposed enforcement action on the number of existing jobs supported directly or indirectly by the surface mining operation.
(g)
(h)Remedies under this section are in addition to, and do not supersede or limit, any and all other remedies, civil or criminal.
SEC. 8.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2016 | In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after April 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77. |
| Aug 17, 2015 | From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 14). |
| Aug 18, 2015 | Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Aug 24, 2015 | In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file. |
| Aug 31, 2015 | From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 27). |
| Sep 1, 2015 | Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading. |
| Sep 8, 2015 | Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Galgiani. |
| Mar 16, 2016 | From inactive file. |
| Mar 16, 2016 | Ordered to second reading. |
| Mar 16, 2016 | Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Jul 1, 2015 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 3349.). |
| Apr 7, 2016 | Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2. |
| Apr 12, 2016 | From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 11). |
| Apr 14, 2016 | Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. |
| Apr 14, 2016 | Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 4354.). |
| Apr 14, 2016 | Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 0.). |
| Apr 18, 2016 | Approved by the Governor. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 7, Statutes of 2016. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 10:15 a.m. |
| May 28, 2015 | Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. |
| Mar 1, 2015 | From printer. May be heard in committee March 31. |
| Mar 2, 2015 | Read first time. |
| Mar 19, 2015 | Referred to Com. on NAT. RES. |
| Apr 6, 2015 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended. |
| Apr 7, 2015 | Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES. |
| May 4, 2015 | From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 27). |
| May 5, 2015 | Read second time and amended. |
| May 6, 2015 | Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| May 27, 2015 | In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file. |
| May 28, 2015 | From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 28). |
| Feb 27, 2015 | Introduced. To print. |
| May 28, 2015 | Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 1613.) |
| May 28, 2015 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Jun 3, 2015 | Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. |
| Jun 3, 2015 | Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 1851.) |
| Jun 4, 2015 | Assembly Rule 69(d) suspended. |
| Jun 4, 2015 | Assembly Rule 69(d) suspended. (Page 1903.) |
| Jun 4, 2015 | In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. |
| Jun 4, 2015 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 1. Page 1911.) |
| Jun 18, 2015 | Referred to Com. on N.R. & W. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2016 | AB 1142 GRAY Concurrence in Senate Amendments | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Apr 11, 2016 | With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in. | Assembly Standing Committee on Natural Resources |
Passed |
|
| Mar 31, 2016 | Assembly 3rd Reading AB1142 Gray By Pavley | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Aug 27, 2015 | Do pass as amended | Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Aug 24, 2015 | Placed on suspense file | Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Jul 14, 2015 | Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Senate Standing Committee on Natural Resources and Water |
Passed |
|
| Jun 4, 2015 | AB 1142 GRAY Assembly Third Reading | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| May 28, 2015 | Do pass. | Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Apr 27, 2015 | Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Assembly Standing Committee on Natural Resources |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| Allied Concrete & Supply Co., Inc. | ** Support | Apr 27, 2015 |
| Associated Builders And Contractors Of California | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Associated General Contractors | * Support | Apr 27, 2015 |
| Associated General Contractors Of California | * Indeterminate | Apr 27, 2015 |
| Azul | ** Against | Mar 31, 2016 |
| BoDean Company | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Brown Sand, Inc. | ** Support | Apr 27, 2015 |
| California Asphalt Pavement Association | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| California Building Industry Association | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| California Business Properties Association | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| California Chamber Of Commerce | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| California Construction And Industrial Materials Association | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| California Independent Petroleum Association | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| California League Of Conservation Voters | ** Against | Mar 31, 2016 |
| California Manufacturers And Technology Association | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| California Native Plant Society | ** Against | Mar 31, 2016 |
| California State Council Of Laborers | ** Support | Apr 27, 2015 |
| California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers | ** Support | Apr 27, 2015 |
| Calportland Company | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Center For Biological Diversity, Inc. | ** Against | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Center For Environmental Health | ** Against | Apr 27, 2015 |
| Chemical Industry Council Of California | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Claim-GV | ** Against | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Clean Water Action | ** Against | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Coalition For Clean Air | ** Against | Apr 27, 2015 |
| Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation | ** Against | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Endangered Habitats League | ** Against | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Environment California | ** Against | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Environmental Justice Coalition for Water | ** Against | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Environmental Working Group | ** Against | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Environmental Working Group | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Fullerton Chamber of Commerce | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| George Reed, Inc. | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Granite | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Granite Construction Company | ** Support | Apr 27, 2015 |
| Granite Rock Company | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Knife River Corporation | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Livingston's Concrete Service, Inc. | ** Support | Apr 27, 2015 |
| Minerals Technologies | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| National Federation Of Independent Business | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| National Federation of Independent Businesses | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| P.W. Gillibrand Co. | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Puente Ready Mix, Inc. | ** Support | Apr 27, 2015 |
| Robertson's | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Robertson's Rock and Sand | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Rural County Representatives of California | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| San Juan Ridge Taxpayers Association | ** Against | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Searles Valley Materials | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Searles Valley Minerals | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Sierra Club California | ** Against | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Sierra County | * Indeterminate | Apr 27, 2015 |
| Southwest California Legislative Council | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Specialty Minerals Inc. | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Stimpel-Wiebelhaus Associates, Inc. | ** Support | Apr 27, 2015 |
| Superior Ready Mix | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Superior Ready Mix Concrete | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Teichert Materials | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| The Sierra Fund | ** Against | Mar 31, 2016 |
| The Sierra Fund | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Trout Unlimited | ** Against | Mar 31, 2016 |
| United Contractors | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Vulcan Materials Company | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Werner Corporation | ** Support | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Wholly H20 | ** Against | Mar 31, 2016 |
| Wolf Creek Community Alliance | ** Against | Mar 31, 2016 |
CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
CSA2 Bill Id:AB 1142
Author:(Gray)
As Amended Ver:March 16, 2016
Majority vote
ASSEMBLY: | 73-1 | (June 4, 2015) | SENATE: | 35-0 | (March 31, 2016) |
COMMITTEE VOTE: | 9-0 | (April 11, 2016) | RECOMMENDATION: | concur |
(Nat. Res.)
Original Committee Reference: NAT. RES.
SUMMARY: Makes numerous changes to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) that are all part of the year-long stakeholder process convened by the Governor's office in 2015 to recommend substantive and procedural changes to the state's mining laws.
The Senate amendments reflect an agreement between the author of this bill and the author of SB 209 (Pavley) of the current legislative session to divide the subject matter of two surface mining bills. Specifically, the Senate Amendments:
- Require the division to provide an accounting of how fee revenue is spent.
- Define "reclamation" and "financial assurances".
- Allow the Department of Conservation (DOC) to appeal financial assurance approvals that they believe are inadequate to the California State Mining and Geology Board (Board).
- Clarify the financial assurance and reclamation plan appeal process to the Board, establish time frames for hearings, specify issues that need to be considered, and clarify under what circumstances the Board can decline to hear appeals.
- Clarify what must be included in a reclamation plan including requiring maps, diagrams, and calculations in the reclamation plan be done by appropriately licensed professionals.
- Require lead agencies to certify that the proposed reclamation plan is complete and compliant with applicable statutes and regulations.
- Allow DOC to make a determination of incompleteness and remand the reclamation plan back to the lead agency for improvements prior to approval. Set a deadline of 30 days for the director of DOC (Director) to notify a lead agency and the operator that a reclamation plan is incomplete. Set deadline of 30 days for the Director to prepare written comments on the reclamation plan after notifying that a reclamation plan is incomplete.
- Prohibit a financial assurance mechanism shall not be released without the consent of the lead agency and the department.
- Clarify how a lead agency may cause the forfeiture of financial assurance mechanism when an operator is financially incapable of completing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan
- Require the Board to develop a form for submission of financial assurances.
- Delete requirement that lead agency have to accept or reject the Financial Assurance Cost Estimates (FACE) within 60 days of receipt of DOC's comments or the due date for the comments, if comments are not received. Deletes requirement for appeal process and timelines if the lead agency determines the FACE is inadequate. The Senate amendments instead, establish a formal process for review of FACE by DOC and include the ability of the DOC to require consultations with lead agencies when they do not agree with the DOC's assessment of the FACE. Require lead agencies to explain in writing why the lead agency is not modifying the FACE pursuant to comments made by the DOC.
- Require inspection reports to be submitted to the DOC within 90 days and specifies what is to be included in the reports.
- Require lead agency to outline intended plan of action to remedy violations noted in inspection report.
EXISTING LAW:
- Creates SMARA, which prohibits a person from conducting surface mining operations unless the lead agency for the operation issues a surface mining permit and approves a reclamation plan and financial assurances for reclamation. Depending on the circumstances, a lead agency can be a city, county, the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, or the Board. Reclamation plans and financial assurances must be submitted to the Director for review.
- Requires the Board to impose an annual reporting fee for each active or idle mining operation. Specifies that the maximum fee for any single mining operation may not exceed $4,000 annually and may not be less than $100 annually, as adjusted for the cost of living, for the purpose of carrying out SMARA.
- Provides a mechanism by which the Board can strip a local agency of its lead agency status for failure to implement state law, the Board then serves as the lead agency.
- Requires lead agencies to require financial assurances of each surface mining operation to ensure reclamation is performed in accordance with the surface mining operation's approved reclamation plan.
- Requires the financial assurance to remain in effect for the duration of the surface mining operation and until the reclamation is complete. Requires the amount of financial assurance to be adjusted annually to account for new lands disturbed by surface mining operations, inflation, and reclamation of lands accomplished in accordance with the approved reclamation plan.
- Requires lead agencies to conduct annual mine inspections to determine compliance with SMARA.
FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, there are unknown costs to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Account (special) for additional review by the director of reclamation plans and financial assurances.
COMMENTS: There are over 1,000 active mines in California that remove aggregate for building material, metals, and minerals. California is the only state in the United States where surface mine reclamation is not regulated by the state. Local governments including cities and counties are the lead agencies for most mines. However, DOC and the Board oversee their permitting, inspection, and enforcement actions. Mining operators are required under SMARA to develop and implement reclamation plans, which will return the mine to a condition where it can be used for another purpose after the mining operation is complete. Annual reports and inspections are supposed to ensure that mining operators are making progress toward reclamation. However, there are instances when the mine operator cannot be located or is unable to complete the mine reclamation. Financial assurances are required to make sure there will be resources available to reclaim the mine. The state and lead agencies have an interest in properly reclaimed mines, because a surface mine is a large hole in the ground and can have many dangerous features. If the mine is reclaimed, the land can be returned to another use. If it is not, the state or the lead agency could be responsible for protecting the public from the dangers of the mine, cleaning up the mine, and reclaiming the mine.
In the Governor's signing statement for SB 447 (Lara), Chapter 417, Statutes of 2013, he called for a top-to-bottom review of SMARA. Multiple stakeholder group meetings have been held to discuss the administration's concerns with SMARA. Issues that are under discussion include:
- Meaningful reclamation of disturbed mine lands;
- Adequate financial assurance;
- Financial assurances are not released until reclamation is complete;
- Financial assurance can be used for reclamation if the mine owner does not reclaim their mine;
- Quality inspections of mines occur annually;
- When inspectors find non-compliance enforcement is clear, timely, and meaningful;
- The Board has tools to improve local SMARA implementation;
- Reporting fees and penalties are paid by operators and that fees cover the cost of the program; and,
- Inappropriate exemptions from SMARA are stopped.
The goal of these talks is to amend SMARA to meet its intent. In DOC released language on these issues and solicited feedback from stakeholders. This language was amended into this bill and SB 209, and therefore, the current bill is the product of the Governor's stakeholder process.
Analysis Prepared by: Michael Jarred / NAT. RES. / (916) 319-2092 FN: 0002725
Date of Hearing: April 11, 2106
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES
Das Williams, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 1142 (
Author:Gray) – As Amended Ver:March 16, 2016
SUBJECT: Mining and geology: surface mining
SUMMARY: Makes numerous changes to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) that are all part of the year-long stakeholder process convened by the Governor's office in 2015 to recommend substantive and procedural changes to the state's mining laws.
EXISTING LAW:
- Creates SMARA, which prohibits a person from conducting surface mining operations unless the lead agency for the operation issues a surface mining permit and approves a reclamation plan and financial assurances for reclamation. Depending on the circumstances, a lead agency can be a city, county, the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, or the California State Mining and Geology Board (Board). Reclamation plans and financial assurances must be submitted to the Director of the Department of Conservation (DOC) for review.
- Requires the Board to impose an annual reporting fee for each active or idle mining operation. Specifies that the maximum fee for any single mining operation may not exceed $4,000 annually and may not be less than $100 annually, as adjusted for the cost of living, for the purpose of carrying out SMARA.
- Provides a mechanism by which the Board can strip a local agency of its lead agency status for failure to implement state law; the Board then serves as the lead agency.
- Requires the Board to adopt regulations that establish state policy for the reclamation of mined lands in accordance with the intent of SMARA.
- Requires lead agencies to require financial assurances for each surface mining operation to ensure reclamation is performed in accordance with the surface mining operation’s approved reclamation plan.
- Requires the financial assurance to remain in effect for the duration of the surface mining operation and until the reclamation is complete. Requires the amount of financial assurance to be adjusted annually to account for new lands disturbed by surface mining operations, inflation, and reclamation of lands accomplished in accordance with the approved reclamation plan.
- Requires lead agencies to conduct annual mine inspections to determine compliance with SMARA.
- Establishes administrative penalties of not more than $5,000 per day from the original date of noncompliance for operators who violate or fail to comply with an order by the lead agency or the director.
- Prohibits a state or local agency from acquiring or utilizing sand, gravel, aggregates, or other mineral products from surface mining operations unless the operation is identified on the AB 3098 List (a reference to the 1992 bill that established the list), which identifies all of the following surface mining operations:
- Surface mining operations for which a report has been submitted to DOC that indicates that: (1) a reclamation plan and financial assurances have been approved pursuant to SMARA; (2) the operations are in compliance with the state's reclamation standards; (3) the operations are in compliance with the state's financial assurance guidelines; and, (4) the annual reporting fee has been submitted to DOC.
- Surface mining operations for which an appeal is pending before the Board, provided that the appeal has not been pending before the Board for more than 180 days.
- Surface mining operations for which an inspection is required and for which an inspection notice has been submitted by the lead agency that indicates both compliance with the approved reclamation plan and that sufficient financial assurances have been approved and secured.
- Surface mining operations for which a report has been submitted to DOC that indicates that: (1) a reclamation plan and financial assurances have been approved pursuant to SMARA; (2) the operations are in compliance with the state's reclamation standards; (3) the operations are in compliance with the state's financial assurance guidelines; and, (4) the annual reporting fee has been submitted to DOC.
- Allows, until January 1, 2019, a surface mine operator whose operations are not in compliance with its approved reclamation plan to remain on the AB 3098 List if the operator stipulated to an order to comply with the lead agency or DOC.
THIS BILL:
- Requires DOC to provide an accounting of how mining fee revenue is spent.
- Defines "reclamation" and "financial assurances",
- Allows DOC to appeal financial assurance approvals that they believe are inadequate to the Board.
- Clarifies the financial assurance and reclamation plan appeal process to the Board, establishes time frames for hearings, specifies issues that need to be considered, and clarifies under what circumstances the Board can decline to hear appeals.
- Clarifies what must be included in a reclamation plan, including requiring maps, diagrams, and calculations in the reclamation plan be done by appropriately licensed professionals.
- Requires lead agencies to certify that the proposed reclamation plan is complete and compliant with applicable statutes and regulations.
- Allows DOC to make a determination of incompleteness and remand the reclamation plan back to the lead agency for improvements prior to approval. Sets a deadline of 30 days for DOC to notify a lead agency and the operator that a reclamation plan is incomplete. Sets deadline of 30 days for DOC to prepare written comments on the reclamation plan after notifying that a reclamation plan is incomplete.
- Prohibits a financial assurance mechanism shall not be released without the consent of the lead agency and DOC.
- Clarifies how a lead agency may cause the forfeiture of financial assurance mechanism when an operator is financially incapable of completing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan
- Requires the Board to develop a form for submission of financial assurances.
- Establishes a formal process for review of financial assurance cost estimate (FACE) by DOC, and includes the ability of the DOC to require consultations with lead agencies when they do not agree with the DOC's assessment of the FACE. Requires lead agencies to explain in writing why the lead agency is not modifying the FACE pursuant to comments made by the DOC.
- Allows a lead agency employee, under specified conditions, to conduct inspections of surface mining operations conducted by the lead agency.
- Specifies that if the operator does not request an inspection date or the lead agency is unable to inspect on the requested date, the lead agency must provide a minimum five days written notice of a pending inspection or a date that is agreed upon by the operator. Deletes the requirement for a lead agency to conduct an inspection within 6 months of receipt of the report and instead requires inspections at 12-month intervals.
- Requires that DOC to establish an inspection training program that all inspectors must complete by July 1, 2020. Requires inspectors to retake the training at least every five years.
- Requires inspection reports to be submitted to the DOC within 90 days and specify what is to be included in the reports.
- Requires lead agency to outline intended plan of action to remedy violations noted in inspection report.
- Allows DOC or the Board to apply to the small claims court or superior court to collect unpaid administrative fees. Allows the lead agency or DOC to assess administrative penalties on operators who do not pay annual reporting fees.
FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, there are unknown costs to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Account for additional review by the director of reclamation plans and financial assurances.
COMMENTS:
- Governor’s stakeholder group. SMARA was passed into law in 1975, and its intent remains unchanged. SMARA states:
It is the intent of the Legislature to create and maintain an effective and comprehensive surface mining and reclamation policy with regulation of surface mining operations so as to assure that:
(a) Adverse environmental effects are prevented or minimized and that mined lands are reclaimed to a usable condition which is readily adaptable for alternative land uses.
(b) The production and conservation of minerals are encouraged, while giving consideration to values relating to recreation, watershed, wildlife, range and forage, and aesthetic enjoyment.
(c) Residual hazards to the public health and safety are eliminated.
In the Governor’s signing statement for SB 447 (Lara, 2013), Chapter 417, Statutes of 2013, he called for a top-to-bottom review of SMARA. Multiple stakeholder group meetings have been held to discuss the administration’s concerns with SMARA. Issues that are under discussion include:
- Meaningful reclamation of disturbed mine lands;
- Adequate financial assurance;
- Financial assurances are not released until reclamation is complete;
- Financial assurance can be used for reclamation if the mine owner does not reclaim their mine;
- Quality inspections of mines occur annually;
- When inspectors find non-compliance, enforcement is clear, timely, and meaningful;
- The Board has tools to improve local SMARA implementation;
- Reporting fees and penalties are paid by operators and that fees cover the cost of the program; and,
- Inappropriate exemptions from SMARA are stopped.
- Meaningful reclamation of disturbed mine lands;
The goal of these talks is to amend SMARA to meet its intent. DOC released language on these issues and solicited feedback from stakeholders. This language was amended into this
bill and SB 209 (Pavley), and, therefore, the current bill is the product of the Governor’s stakeholder process.
- Reclamation. There are over a thousand active mines in California that remove aggregate for building material, metals, and minerals. California is the only state in the U.S. where surface mine reclamation is not regulated by the state. Local governments, including cities and counties, are the lead agencies for most mines. However, DOC and the Board oversee their permitting, inspection, and enforcement actions. Mining operators are required under SMARA to develop and implement reclamation plans, which will return the mine to a condition where it can be used for another purpose after the mining operation is complete. Annual reports and inspections are supposed to ensure that mining operators are making progress toward reclamation. However, there are instances when the mine operator cannot be located or is unable to complete the mine reclamation. Financial assurances are required to make sure there will be resources available to reclaim the mine. The state and lead agencies have an interest in properly reclaimed mines, because a surface mine is a large hole in the ground and can have many dangerous features. If the mine is reclaimed, the land can be returned to another use. If it is not, the state or the lead agency could be responsible for protecting the public from the dangers of the mine, cleaning up the mine, and reclaiming the mine. AB 1142 creates a new layer of DOC review of reclamation plans to ensure they are complete and to give the Director an opportunity to improve the plans. AB 1142 also attempts to improve financial assurances by making sure they are adequate and prevent the release of mechanisms prior to completion of reclamation by requiring both the DOC and lead agency to agree to their release.
- Inspections. Lead agencies are required to annually inspect mines to ensure they are complying with their permits, reclamation plan, and SMARA. Permit conditions imposed by a regional water quality control board or the Department or Fish and Wildlife can be included in a SMARA permit. These conditions can include requirements that deal with water quality issues and streambed alterations. In addition, mine inspectors are the inspectors most often in the mine and the last inspector in the mine before it closes. Often mine inspectors play a vital role in ensuring compliance with other environmental laws. However, lead agencies in the past have not always inspected mines frequently or adequately. AB 1142 requires the DOC to establish an inspection training program and for inspectors to retake the program every five years.
- Enforcement. The largest compliance problem DOC faces is that many mines do not file annual reports or pay their fees. Most lead agencies do not take enforcement actions except in rare, egregious cases. According to one lead agency, last year all of their 10 compliance orders were settled prior to a public hearing. However, the administration has stated that when inspections indicated non-compliance, the problems identified are often never fixed. It is important that lead agencies have the tools to bring mines into compliance. AB 1142 allows the lead agency or DOC to assess administrative penalties of operators who do not pay annual reporting fees. AB 1142 provides the Board with more tools to work with lead agencies to address problems with their implementation of SMARA, such as remedial plans or taking away some of their powers.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
None on file
Opposition
None on file
Analysis Prepared by: Michael Jarred / NAT. RES. / (916) 319-2092
CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
CSA1 Bill Id:AB 1142
Author:(Gray)
As Amended Ver:March 16, 2016
Majority vote
ASSEMBLY: | 73-1 | (June 4, 2015) | SENATE: | 35-0 | (March 31, 2016) |
Original Committee Reference: NAT. RES.
SUMMARY: Makes numerous changes to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) that are all part of the year-long stakeholder process convened by the Governor's office in 2015 to recommend substantive and procedural changes to the state's mining laws.
The Senate amendments reflect an agreement between the author of this bill and the author of SB 209 (Pavley) of the current legislative session to divide the subject matter of two surface mining bills. Specifically, the Senate Amendments:
- Require the division to provide an accounting of how fee revenue is spent.
- Define "reclamation" and "financial assurances".
- Allow the Department of Conservation (DOC) to appeal financial assurance approvals that they believe are inadequate to the Board.
- Clarify the financial assurance and reclamation plan appeal process to the California State Mining and Geology Board (Board), establish time frames for hearings, specify issues that need to be considered, and clarify under what circumstances the Board can decline to hear appeals.
- Clarify what must be included in a reclamation plan including requiring maps, diagrams, and calculations in the reclamation plan be done by appropriately licensed professionals.
- Require lead agencies to certify that the proposed reclamation plan is complete and compliant with applicable statutes and regulations.
- Allow DOC to make a determination of incompleteness and remand the reclamation plan back to the lead agency for improvements prior to approval. Set a deadline of 30 days for the director of DOC (Director) to notify a lead agency and the operator that a reclamation plan is incomplete. Set deadline of 30 days for the Director to prepare written comments on the reclamation plan after notifying that a reclamation plan is incomplete.
- Prohibit a financial assurance mechanism shall not be released without the consent of the lead agency and the department.
- Clarify how a lead agency may cause the forfeiture of financial assurance mechanism when an operator is financially incapable of completing reclamation in accordance with its approved reclamation plan
- Require the Board to develop a form for submission of financial assurances.
- Delete requirement that lead agency to accept or reject the Financial Assurance Cost Estimates (FACE) within 60 days of receipt of DOC's comments or the due date for the comments, if comments are not received. Delete requirement for appeal process and timelines if the lead agency determines the FACE is inadequate. Senate amendments instead, establish a formal process for review of FACE by DOC and include the ability of the DOC to require consultations with lead agencies when they do not agree with the DOC's assessment of the FACE. Require lead agencies to explain in writing why the lead agency is not modifying the FACE pursuant to comments made by the DOC.
- Require inspection reports to be submitted to the DOC within 90 days and specify what is to be included in the reports.
- Require lead agency to outline intended plan of action to remedy violations noted in inspection report.
EXISTING LAW:
- Creates SMARA, which prohibits a person from conducting surface mining operations unless the lead agency for the operation issues a surface mining permit and approves a reclamation plan and financial assurances for reclamation. Depending on the circumstances, a lead agency can be a city, county, the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, or the Board. Reclamation plans and financial assurances must be submitted to the Director for review.
- Requires the Board to impose an annual reporting fee for each active or idle mining operation. Specifies that the maximum fee for any single mining operation may not exceed $4,000 annually and may not be less than $100 annually, as adjusted for the cost of living, for the purpose of carrying out SMARA.
- Provides a mechanism by which the Board can strip a local agency of its lead agency status for failure to implement state law, the Board then serves as the lead agency.
- Requires lead agencies to require financial assurances of each surface mining operation to ensure reclamation is performed in accordance with the surface mining operation's approved reclamation plan.
- Requires the financial assurance to remain in effect for the duration of the surface mining operation and until the reclamation is complete. Requires the amount of financial assurance to be adjusted annually to account for new lands disturbed by surface mining operations, inflation, and reclamation of lands accomplished in accordance with the approved reclamation plan.
- Requires lead agencies to conduct annual mine inspections to determine compliance with SMARA.
FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, there are unknown costs to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Account (special) for additional review by the director of reclamation plans and financial assurances.
COMMENTS: There are over 1,000 active mines in California that remove aggregate for building material, metals, and minerals. California is the only state in the United States where surface mine reclamation is not regulated by the state. Local governments including cities and counties are the lead agencies for most mines. However, DOC and the Board oversee their permitting, inspection, and enforcement actions. Mining operators are required under SMARA to develop and implement reclamation plans, which will return the mine to a condition where it can be used for another purpose after the mining operation is complete. Annual reports and inspections are supposed to ensure that mining operators are making progress toward reclamation. However, there are instances when the mine operator cannot be located or is unable to complete the mine reclamation. Financial assurances are required to make sure there will be resources available to reclaim the mine. The state and lead agencies have an interest in properly reclaimed mines, because a surface mine is a large hole in the ground and can have many dangerous features. If the mine is reclaimed, the land can be returned to another use. If it is not, the state or the lead agency could be responsible for protecting the public from the dangers of the mine, cleaning up the mine, and reclaiming the mine.
In the Governor's signing statement for SB 447 (Lara), Chapter 417, Statutes of 2013, he called for a top-to-bottom review of SMARA. Multiple stakeholder group meetings have been held to discuss the administration's concerns with SMARA. Issues that are under discussion include:
- Meaningful reclamation of disturbed mine lands;
- Adequate financial assurance;
- Financial assurances are not released until reclamation is complete;
- Financial assurance can be used for reclamation if the mine owner does not reclaim their mine;
- Quality inspections of mines occur annually;
- When inspectors find non-compliance enforcement is clear, timely, and meaningful;
- The Board has tools to improve local SMARA implementation;
- Reporting fees and penalties are paid by operators and that fees cover the cost of the program; and,
- Inappropriate exemptions from SMARA are stopped.
The goal of these talks is to amend SMARA to meet its intent. In DOC released language on these issues and solicited feedback from stakeholders. This language was amended into this bill and SB 209, and therefore, the current bill is the product of the Governor's stakeholder process.
Analysis Prepared by: Michael Jarred / NAT. RES. / (916) 319-2092 FN: 0002676
Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | AB |
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 1142
:
SENATE NATURAL RES. & WATER COMMITTEE: 8-0, 7/14/15
AYES: Pavley, Allen, Hertzberg, Hueso, Jackson, Monning, Vidak, Wolk
NO VOTE RECORDED: Stone
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 5-0, 8/27/15
AYES: Lara, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza
NO VOTE RECORDED: Bates, Nielsen
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 73-1, 6/4/15 - See last page for vote
DIGEST: This bill makes numerous changes to the state surface mining provisions regarding reclamation plans, financial assurances, annual inspections, and enforcement. It is subject to a contingent enactment provision that is also attached to SB 209 (Pavley), another surface mining reform bill.
Senate Floor Amendments of 3/16/16 reflect an agreement between the author and Senator Pavley to divide the subject matter of two surface mining bills. Both bills have been amended to reflect a consensus with the administration, local governments, industry representatives, and conservation groups. Many of the provisions in AB 1142 received policy committee analysis when considered in SB 209. All of the provisions in both bills were the subject of extensive negotiation by a stakeholder process convened by the administration.
Existing law:
- Prohibits surface mining, with exceptions, unless a permit is obtained from, a specified reclamation plan is submitted and approved by, and financial assurances have been approved by the lead agency (usually a local government) for the operation of the surface mining operation. Operators are entitled to be in “substantial compliance” with these provisions.
- Requires annual inspections of surface mining operations by the lead agency to be performed by a state-licensed architect, civil engineer, landscape architect, or forester.
- Requires the lead agency to have primary responsibility for enforcement and establishes deadlines when that responsibility is transferred to the director of the Department of Conservation (DOC).
This bill:
- Revises reclamation plan requirements to include more thorough information including maps, dates of initiation and termination of mining, depth of mining, and other data so that they are more likely to be complete. To the extent these documents require preparation by a licensed professional, the bill requires that a licensed professional prepare the document and include his or her license number, signature, and seal. This provision refers to documents prepared by professional engineers, geologists, or land surveyors.
- Establishes a process for operators to correct deficiencies identified by the DOC in reclamation plans.
- Establishes a process for the lead agency to submit reclamation plans to the director for review and for the review and comment of the director back to the lead agency.
- Revises the financial assurance provisions of the state surface mining law to require upgrades when shown to be necessary by the annual inspections and requires the lead agency to submit the financial assurances to the director.
- Standardizes the financial assurances cost estimates in a new format that will be developed by the director and approved by the State Mining and Geology Board (board).
- Revises the appeals procedures for review of financial assurances and allows the director to appeal to the board. Incomplete financial assurances may be remanded to the lead agency.
- Establishes, in cases where the lead agency determines that an operator may be financially incapable of performing reclamation in accordance with a reclamation plan, a procedure to forfeit the financial assurances following a public hearing that meets specified conditions.
- Requires actual compliance with the act for purposes of determining compliance with the reclamation plan and financial assurances requirements.
- Requires, for annual inspections, proof of such inspections, and authorizes counties to use their own employees for such inspections assuming those employees meet the inspection training criteria that are also created in this bill.
- Revises and recasts the provisions related to enforcement to eliminate procedural dead-ends that were in the prior law. It also authorizes the director or the board to apply to small claims court to collect unpaid administrative penalties.
- Gives the board more options for oversight of local lead agencies to improve the performance of lead agencies other than removing them from their status as lead agency.
- Makes many other technical and procedural changes to the state’s surface mining law.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: Fiscal Com.: Local:
According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, there are unknown costs to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Account (special) for additional review by the director of reclamation plans and financial assurances.
Associated Builders and Contractors of California
BoDean Company
California Asphalt Pavement Association
California Business Properties Association
California Chamber of Commerce
California Construction and Industrial Materials Association
California Independent Petroleum Association
California Labor Federation
California Manufacturers and Technology Association
CalPortland Company
Cemex
Environmental Working Group
Fullerton Chamber of Commerce
George Reed Inc.
Granite
Knife River Corporation
Lehigh Hanson
Minerals Technologies
National Federation of Independent Business
P.W. Gillibrand Co.
Puente Ready Mix
Robertson’s Rock and Sand
Rural County Representatives of California
Searles Valley Materials
Southwest California Legislative Council
Specialty Minerals
Superior Ready Mix
Teichert Materials
The Sierra Fund
United Contractors
Vulcan Materials Company
Werner Corporation
OPPOSITION: (Verified 3/23/16)
None received
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: According to the author, the Governor called for a top to bottom review of the state mining law in his signing message of SB 447 (Lara) in 2013. The author believes this bill strengthens the mining law to ensure effective communication between local lead agencies, the state, and mine operators. The bill sets appropriate and timely inspection schedules, promotes management flexibility while ensuring each facility’s compliance obligations are clear, and incorporates numerous concepts from the administration’s stakeholder process that are designed to strengthen the review of approvals pursuant to the state’s mining law.
The California Construction and Industrial Materials Association states that AB 1142 provides clarity and timelines to important existing processes required under existing law. The group, and the other business interests in support, argue that the bill provides clarity regarding the content of reclamation plans and financial assurances but in ways that are flexible enough to allow future approvals for the benefit of operators.
A business coalition headed by the California Chamber of Commerce supports the improvements to the inspection process, to the financial assurance provisions, and to the enhanced oversight of the financial assurance provisions, while at the same time ensuring that construction aggregates remain viable and cost-effective.
The California Labor Federation supports the bill because the improvements to the state’s mining laws minimize impacts to existing jobs.
The Sierra Fund and the Environmental Working Group support this bill because of the improvements made to the inspection, financial assurance, enforcement, and reclamation plan provisions.
The California League of Conservation Voters has removed its opposition.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 73-1, 6/4/15
AYES: Achadjian, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gonzalez, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins
NOES: Levine
NO VOTE RECORDED: Alejo, Gomez, Gordon, Nazarian, Rendon, Ting
3/28/16 10:28:57
AB 1142
Page 9
|
Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 |
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 1142
Amended: 9/1/15 in Senate
SENATE NATURAL RES. & WATER COMMITTEE: 8-0, 7/14/15
AYES: Pavley, Allen, Hertzberg, Hueso, Jackson, Monning, Vidak, Wolk
NO VOTE RECORDED: Stone
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 5-0, 8/27/15
AYES: Lara, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza
NO VOTE RECORDED: Bates, Nielsen
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 73-1, 6/4/15 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Mining and geology: surface mining
DIGEST: This bill contains several major amendments to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA). Some of these amendments were proposed by the Governor’s Office stakeholder process on mining law reform. Specifically, the bill contains amendments on annual mine inspections, financial assurances and the approval of financial surety documents, reclamation plans, enforcement, the role of the State Mining and Geology Board including appeals, and other technical changes. The bill is linked to SB 209 (Pavley) by contingent enactment amendments made to both bills in the Appropriations Committees of both houses. SB 209 deals with other aspects of SMARA.
Existing law:
Establishes the Department of Conservation (DOC) one of whose purposes is to administer the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) which is the primary state statute that applies to surface mining activities in California for both hard metals, minerals, and sand and gravel. DOC has administratively created the Office of Mine Reclamation (OMR) as the primary mine regulator for California.
Prohibits, generally, surface mining unless a permit is obtained from DOC, a reclamation plan is approved, and financial assurances have been approved. Local land use permits are also required.
Provides, in SMARA, as follows:
Section 2772 generally sets forth the types of information that are to be contained in reclamation plans. This includes such features as the ownership information of the operation, the quantity and type of minerals that will be extracted, dates to initiate and terminate mining, depth of mining, legal descriptions of the property to be mined, and numerous other types of information that have been traditionally required.
Section 2773 directs the reclamation plan to address issues such as re-vegetation, erosion control, soil stability, topography, and stream characteristics. Importantly, it also directs the State Mining and Geology Board (SMGB) to promulgate reclamation standards that include wildlife habitat, stream protection, topsoil salvage, tailing and mine waste management, and a variety of other topics.
Section 2773.3 provides additional protections for Native American sites from hard rock mining (gold and silver).
Directs that local lead agencies are generally responsible for ensuring that reclamation plans are adopted pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Requires annual inspections of mines to be conducted by the lead agency, and those inspections form the basis for surety documents (called “financial assurances” in SMARA) that can be used to pay for any mine reclamation costs in the event a mine operator defaults on the obligation to reclaim a mine at the end of its useful life. In most circumstances, the lead agency is responsible for developing an adequate financial assurances surety.
Permits, under specific circumstances, for the State Mining and Geology Board to become the lead agency when the local lead agency fails to fulfill its statutory responsibilities. This process is quasi-judicial with appeals possible to the SMGB and for judicial review.
Protects local land use siting or permitting decisions of local governments, while at the same time SMARA imposes administrative and compliance responsibilities on local governments in their capacity as local lead agencies.
Collects fees to pay for the administrative costs of the mine regulatory program. Minimum fees of $100 apply to most mines, and the maximum is $4,000. The overall program costs are capped by statute at $3.5 million, adjusted for inflation. The caps on mine operators and the overall program costs have generated no increase in revenue to DOC for several years. In fact, DOC often has greater expenditure authority than available fee revenues in annual budget bills. This issue is addressed in SB 209 (Pavley).
Requires annual inspections, although SMARA does not specify the training that mine inspectors should have, nor does it require DOC to offer training to local lead agencies or others who may wish to inspect mines.
Does not explicitly allow local lead agencies to inspect mines owned by those local lead agencies.
This bill proposes numerous changes to SMARA, which can be summarized as follows:
Bifurcates, consistent with the Governor’s stakeholder group recommendations, in Section 4 the term “financial assurances” to mean both a current financial assurance cost estimate (FACE) and a financial assurance mechanism that is at least equal to the current approved financial assurance cost estimate. It also continues existing practice that the review of financial assurances shall not be considered a project for purposes of CEQA. It contains procedures for approval of financial assurances and appeals of inadequate financial assurances to the SMGB.
Amends section 2772 of the Public Resources Code which contains many of the provisions for mine reclamation plans. These are not identical to the stakeholder group recommendations but achieve many of the same objectives.
Establishes, although facially very complex, new procedures that include timelines, appeal procedures, periods for review and comment back and forth between lead agencies and the department both for reclamation plan approvals and financial assurance adequacy determinations. Options to ensure compliance are set forth when noncompliance is identified by the department.
Adds appeal procedures to the State Mining and Geology Board and provisions for the Board to provide notice, hearing, and orders to comply to lead agencies when warranted.
Contains, in Section 11, a new provision that improves the administrative penalty collection procedure and has built-in due process safeguards for the operator. The department would be able to undertake collection activities itself rather than using the Attorney General, and depending on the amount of unpaid penalties, could undertake collection either in small claims or superior courts.
Makes numerous technical and clarifying changes to SMARA.
Background
The DOC has identified many flaws in the administration of SMARA. These include the lack of inspections, inadequate financial assurances, and a labyrinthine enforcement process that is fundamentally broken. Governor Brown in a signing message to recent legislation called for a “top to bottom” review of SMARA. The administration convened a stakeholder group that met several times in 2015 and reviewed several SMARA-related issues.
The Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee Science Fellow in 2012 identified many examples of failed SMARA implementation that involved both local and state government. Highlights of this review indicated that more than 100 closed mines have not begun reclamation, that the rate of conducting required annual inspections hovers in the 25% and 50% range for cities and counties, respectively, and that financial assurance surety documents are updated by 27 percent of the counties and only 20 percent of the cities. The data collection system of DOC has been criticized for data gaps. The Committee report was based on reported data.
Comments
Author’s amendments in Senate Appropriations resolved many of the issues identified in the Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee. These include the following:
Incorporation of regulatory provisions from the State Mining and Geology Board regarding the approval of reclamation plans and financial assurances in several places throughout the bill;
Deletion of phrases such as “substantially complies” in favor of complete compliance and a definition of “substantial” so that operators know what is expected of them. The department has additional authority to require the re-submission of documents that are not complete and that do not incorporate the comments of sister regulatory agencies such as the Department of Fish and Wildlife or regional water boards; Appeals to the SMGB will turn on whether there was actual compliance with SMARA.
Improved communication procedures between lead agencies and the department regarding development and approval of reclamation plans and financial assurance mechanisms and procedures to deal with incomplete or noncompliant documents;
More complete and functional enforcement process that includes improved communications between local lead agencies and the department as well as improved procedures for orders to comply directed at operators to be implemented;
Operator options to correct deficiencies identified during an annual inspection;
establishing a training program for mine inspectors and qualifications for those inspectors;
A new enforcement protocol with deadlines and appeals procedures with established deadlines; and
A more-defined role for the SMGB when it is necessary for it to assume some local lead agency authorities such as when they approve reclamation plans or financial assurances that are inconsistent with SMARA.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal
Com.: Yes Local: Yes
According
to the Senate Appropriations Committee, there are unknown
costs to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Account (special) for
additional review by the director of reclamation plans and financial
assurances.
A. Teichert & Son
Associated Builders and Contractors of California
California Asphalt Pavement Association
California Building Industry Association
California Business Properties Association
California Chamber of Commerce
California Construction and Industrial Materials Association
California Independent Petroleum Association
California Labor Federation
California Manufacturers & Technology Association
CalPortland Company
CEMEX
Chemical Industry Council of California
Fullerton chamber of Commerce
George Reed, Inc.
Granite Construction Co
Granite Rock Company
Lehigh Hanson
National Federation of Independent Businesses
P.W. Gillibrand Co., Inc.
Robertson’s
Rural County Representatives of California
Searles Valley Minerals
Southwest California Legislative Council
Southwest California Legislative Council
Specialty Minerals Inc.
Superior Ready Mix Concrete
The Associated General Contractors
United Contractors
Vulcan Materials Company
Azul
Sierra Club California
California League of Conservation Voters
California Native Plant Society
Center for Biological Diversity
Claim-GV
Clean Water Action
Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation
Endangered Habitats League
Environment California
Environmental Justice Coalition for Water
Environmental Working Group
The Sierra Fund
San Juan Ridge Taxpayers Association
Trout Unlimited
Wholly H20
Wolf Creek Community Alliance
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: According to the author, this bill modernizes SMARA. He notes that the Governor called for a “top to bottom” review of SMARA in signing SB 447 (Lara) in 2013. The author also acknowledges that the administrative requirements of SMARA are not being properly and fully implemented by local lead agencies including proper inspections and annual financial assurance reviews.
The author contends that the bill strengthens SMARA by ensuring better communication between local lead agencies, operators, and the department. He feels the bill sets forth appropriate and timely inspection schedules while promoting management flexibility for regulators and ensuring that operators’ compliance obligations are clear.
The author believes that the bill incorporates several of the administration’s reform concepts and he points to a list of such reforms including but not limited to: the new ability of the director to appeal the approval of a financial assurance to the SMGB, the inclusion of specified maps in the reclamation plan, clarifying the incorporation of documents and standards into reclamation plans, the provision allowing local lead agency employees to inspect mines following a workshop, a new timeline for the director to determine if a financial assurance or reclamation plan is complete, and the new provision requiring concurrence by the director with the lead agency regarding the release to the operator of the financial assurance mechanism.
A coalition headed by the California Chamber of Commerce believes the bill clarifies the duties and responsibilities of mine operators, lead agencies, and the state, as well as makes procedural improvements to the annual inspection process, the financial assurance process, the reclamation plan approval process, and other provisions of SMARA. The Chamber says that a new inspection form and requiring inspections to be performed by licensed professionals will improve the integrity of annual inspections.
As for financial assurances, the Chamber supports the provision that requires annual reviews of financial assurances to ensure that those financial assurances are adequate to reclaim the site upon the default of the operator. It also suggests that the provisions allowing the department to determine that a financial assurance is “complete” will drive local lead agencies to work harder to make sure that these financial assurances are adequate. The department is provided a new appeal right to the SMGB for inadequate financial assurance documents.
The Chamber asserts that the proposed amendment allowing various documents that comprise a reclamation plan to be displayed on a chart will allow the incorporation by reference of specified documents.
An assortment of mining companies sent in separate letters arguing that the bill modernizes and clarifies SMARA and improves communication.
The California Labor Federation indicated that it supported the bill based on a provision (since removed) that was intended to protect jobs.
RCRC supports the training provision for local government personnel to inspect mines, as well as the removal of a provision from SMARA that prohibits a state licensed professional from conducting a mine inspection for the lead agency who had been employed by any surface mining operation within the jurisdiction of the lead agency in any capacity during the previous 12 months.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: A coalition that includes The Sierra Fund, the California League of Conservation Voters, Sierra Club and others focus on Section 2774 in their letter.
That section has been amended along with many provisions of the bill, and it is not known if the opposition has been removed or not.
Section 2774, dealing with inspections, is viewed by the opposition coalition as a key provision to make sure that inspections and any necessary enforcement actually occur. As originally drafted, the opposition said that the bill weakens inspections by allowing inspections only for the purpose of ensuring that operations are in compliance with the reclamation plan, rather than SMARA as a whole.
Given the amendments in Senate Appropriations, the more likely concern of the opposition is whether documents from other reviewing agencies, such as the Department of Fish and Wildlife and regional water boards, would be automatically included in reclamation plans in advance of the approval of those plans. The bill currently provides that comments from reviewing agencies must be included and complied with in the context of appeals to the SMGB. An author’s amendment would allow such conditions of approval and mitigation from other reviewing agencies to be included in an appendix prepared within 60 days of the approval of a reclamation plan. Such provisions would then become subject to subsequent annual inspections.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 73-1, 6/4/15
AYES: Achadjian, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gonzalez, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins
NOES: Levine
NO VOTE RECORDED: Alejo, Gomez, Gordon, Nazarian, Rendon, Ting
Prepared by: William Craven / N.R. & W. / (916) 651-4116
9/2/15 11:47:21
**** END ****
AB 1142
Page 9
|
Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 |
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 1142
Amended: 9/1/15 in Senate
SENATE NATURAL RES. & WATER COMMITTEE: 8-0, 7/14/15
AYES: Pavley, Allen, Hertzberg, Hueso, Jackson, Monning, Vidak, Wolk
NO VOTE RECORDED: Stone
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 5-0, 8/27/15
AYES: Lara, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza
NO VOTE RECORDED: Bates, Nielsen
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 73-1, 6/4/15 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Mining and geology: surface mining
DIGEST: This bill contains several major amendments to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA). Some of these amendments were proposed by the Governor’s Office stakeholder process on mining law reform. Specifically, the bill contains amendments on annual mine inspections, financial assurances and the approval of financial surety documents, reclamation plans, enforcement, the role of the State Mining and Geology Board including appeals, and other technical changes. The bill is linked to SB 209 (Pavley) by contingent enactment amendments made to both bills in the Appropriations Committees of both houses. SB 209 deals with other aspects of SMARA.
Existing law:
Establishes the Department of Conservation (DOC) one of whose purposes is to administer the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) which is the primary state statute that applies to surface mining activities in California for both hard metals, minerals, and sand and gravel. DOC has administratively created the Office of Mine Reclamation (OMR) as the primary mine regulator for California.
Prohibits, generally, surface mining unless a permit is obtained from DOC, a reclamation plan is approved, and financial assurances have been approved. Local land use permits are also required.
Provides, in SMARA, as follows:
Section 2772 generally sets forth the types of information that are to be contained in reclamation plans. This includes such features as the ownership information of the operation, the quantity and type of minerals that will be extracted, dates to initiate and terminate mining, depth of mining, legal descriptions of the property to be mined, and numerous other types of information that have been traditionally required.
Section 2773 directs the reclamation plan to address issues such as re-vegetation, erosion control, soil stability, topography, and stream characteristics. Importantly, it also directs the State Mining and Geology Board (SMGB) to promulgate reclamation standards that include wildlife habitat, stream protection, topsoil salvage, tailing and mine waste management, and a variety of other topics.
Section 2773.3 provides additional protections for Native American sites from hard rock mining (gold and silver).
Directs that local lead agencies are generally responsible for ensuring that reclamation plans are adopted pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Requires annual inspections of mines to be conducted by the lead agency, and those inspections form the basis for surety documents (called “financial assurances” in SMARA) that can be used to pay for any mine reclamation costs in the event a mine operator defaults on the obligation to reclaim a mine at the end of its useful life. In most circumstances, the lead agency is responsible for developing an adequate financial assurances surety.
Permits, under specific circumstances, for the State Mining and Geology Board to become the lead agency when the local lead agency fails to fulfill its statutory responsibilities. This process is quasi-judicial with appeals possible to the SMGB and for judicial review.
Protects local land use siting or permitting decisions of local governments, while at the same time SMARA imposes administrative and compliance responsibilities on local governments in their capacity as local lead agencies.
Collects fees to pay for the administrative costs of the mine regulatory program. Minimum fees of $100 apply to most mines, and the maximum is $4,000. The overall program costs are capped by statute at $3.5 million, adjusted for inflation. The caps on mine operators and the overall program costs have generated no increase in revenue to DOC for several years. In fact, DOC often has greater expenditure authority than available fee revenues in annual budget bills. This issue is addressed in SB 209 (Pavley).
Requires annual inspections, although SMARA does not specify the training that mine inspectors should have, nor does it require DOC to offer training to local lead agencies or others who may wish to inspect mines.
Does not explicitly allow local lead agencies to inspect mines owned by those local lead agencies.
This bill proposes numerous changes to SMARA, which can be summarized as follows:
Bifurcates, consistent with the Governor’s stakeholder group recommendations, in Section 4 the term “financial assurances” to mean both a current financial assurance cost estimate (FACE) and a financial assurance mechanism that is at least equal to the current approved financial assurance cost estimate. It also continues existing practice that the review of financial assurances shall not be considered a project for purposes of CEQA. It contains procedures for approval of financial assurances and appeals of inadequate financial assurances to the SMGB.
Amends section 2772 of the Public Resources Code which contains many of the provisions for mine reclamation plans. These are not identical to the stakeholder group recommendations but achieve many of the same objectives.
Establishes, although facially very complex, new procedures that include timelines, appeal procedures, periods for review and comment back and forth between lead agencies and the department both for reclamation plan approvals and financial assurance adequacy determinations. Options to ensure compliance are set forth when noncompliance is identified by the department.
Adds appeal procedures to the State Mining and Geology Board and provisions for the Board to provide notice, hearing, and orders to comply to lead agencies when warranted.
Contains, in Section 11, a new provision that improves the administrative penalty collection procedure and has built-in due process safeguards for the operator. The department would be able to undertake collection activities itself rather than using the Attorney General, and depending on the amount of unpaid penalties, could undertake collection either in small claims or superior courts.
Makes numerous technical and clarifying changes to SMARA.
Background
The DOC has identified many flaws in the administration of SMARA. These include the lack of inspections, inadequate financial assurances, and a labyrinthine enforcement process that is fundamentally broken. Governor Brown in a signing message to recent legislation called for a “top to bottom” review of SMARA. The administration convened a stakeholder group that met several times in 2015 and reviewed several SMARA-related issues.
The Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee Science Fellow in 2012 identified many examples of failed SMARA implementation that involved both local and state government. Highlights of this review indicated that more than 100 closed mines have not begun reclamation, that the rate of conducting required annual inspections hovers in the 25% and 50% range for cities and counties, respectively, and that financial assurance surety documents are updated by 27 percent of the counties and only 20 percent of the cities. The data collection system of DOC has been criticized for data gaps. The Committee report was based on reported data.
Comments
Author’s amendments in Senate Appropriations resolved many of the issues identified in the Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee. These include the following:
Incorporation of regulatory provisions from the State Mining and Geology Board regarding the approval of reclamation plans and financial assurances in several places throughout the bill;
Deletion of phrases such as “substantially complies” in favor of complete compliance and a definition of “substantial” so that operators know what is expected of them. The department has additional authority to require the re-submission of documents that are not complete and that do not incorporate the comments of sister regulatory agencies such as the Department of Fish and Wildlife or regional water boards; Appeals to the SMGB will turn on whether there was actual compliance with SMARA.
Improved communication procedures between lead agencies and the department regarding development and approval of reclamation plans and financial assurance mechanisms and procedures to deal with incomplete or noncompliant documents;
More complete and functional enforcement process that includes improved communications between local lead agencies and the department as well as improved procedures for orders to comply directed at operators to be implemented;
Operator options to correct deficiencies identified during an annual inspection;
establishing a training program for mine inspectors and qualifications for those inspectors;
A new enforcement protocol with deadlines and appeals procedures with established deadlines; and
A more-defined role for the SMGB when it is necessary for it to assume some local lead agency authorities such as when they approve reclamation plans or financial assurances that are inconsistent with SMARA.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal
Com.: Yes Local: Yes
According
to the Senate Appropriations Committee, there are unknown
costs to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Account (special) for
additional review by the director of reclamation plans and financial
assurances.
A. Teichert & Son
Associated Builders and Contractors of California
California Asphalt Pavement Association
California Building Industry Association
California Business Properties Association
California Chamber of Commerce
California Construction and Industrial Materials Association
California Independent Petroleum Association
California Labor Federation
California Manufacturers & Technology Association
CalPortland Company
CEMEX
Chemical Industry Council of California
Fullerton chamber of Commerce
George Reed, Inc.
Granite Construction Co
Granite Rock Company
Lehigh Hanson
National Federation of Independent Businesses
P.W. Gillibrand Co., Inc.
Robertson’s
Rural County Representatives of California
Searles Valley Minerals
Southwest California Legislative Council
Southwest California Legislative Council
Specialty Minerals Inc.
Superior Ready Mix Concrete
The Associated General Contractors
United Contractors
Vulcan Materials Company
Azul
Sierra Club California
California League of Conservation Voters
California Native Plant Society
Center for Biological Diversity
Claim-GV
Clean Water Action
Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation
Endangered Habitats League
Environment California
Environmental Justice Coalition for Water
Environmental Working Group
The Sierra Fund
San Juan Ridge Taxpayers Association
Trout Unlimited
Wholly H20
Wolf Creek Community Alliance
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: According to the author, this bill modernizes SMARA. He notes that the Governor called for a “top to bottom” review of SMARA in signing SB 447 (Lara) in 2013. The author also acknowledges that the administrative requirements of SMARA are not being properly and fully implemented by local lead agencies including proper inspections and annual financial assurance reviews.
The author contends that the bill strengthens SMARA by ensuring better communication between local lead agencies, operators, and the department. He feels the bill sets forth appropriate and timely inspection schedules while promoting management flexibility for regulators and ensuring that operators’ compliance obligations are clear.
The author believes that the bill incorporates several of the administration’s reform concepts and he points to a list of such reforms including but not limited to: the new ability of the director to appeal the approval of a financial assurance to the SMGB, the inclusion of specified maps in the reclamation plan, clarifying the incorporation of documents and standards into reclamation plans, the provision allowing local lead agency employees to inspect mines following a workshop, a new timeline for the director to determine if a financial assurance or reclamation plan is complete, and the new provision requiring concurrence by the director with the lead agency regarding the release to the operator of the financial assurance mechanism.
A coalition headed by the California Chamber of Commerce believes the bill clarifies the duties and responsibilities of mine operators, lead agencies, and the state, as well as makes procedural improvements to the annual inspection process, the financial assurance process, the reclamation plan approval process, and other provisions of SMARA. The Chamber says that a new inspection form and requiring inspections to be performed by licensed professionals will improve the integrity of annual inspections.
As for financial assurances, the Chamber supports the provision that requires annual reviews of financial assurances to ensure that those financial assurances are adequate to reclaim the site upon the default of the operator. It also suggests that the provisions allowing the department to determine that a financial assurance is “complete” will drive local lead agencies to work harder to make sure that these financial assurances are adequate. The department is provided a new appeal right to the SMGB for inadequate financial assurance documents.
The Chamber asserts that the proposed amendment allowing various documents that comprise a reclamation plan to be displayed on a chart will allow the incorporation by reference of specified documents.
An assortment of mining companies sent in separate letters arguing that the bill modernizes and clarifies SMARA and improves communication.
The California Labor Federation indicated that it supported the bill based on a provision (since removed) that was intended to protect jobs.
RCRC supports the training provision for local government personnel to inspect mines, as well as the removal of a provision from SMARA that prohibits a state licensed professional from conducting a mine inspection for the lead agency who had been employed by any surface mining operation within the jurisdiction of the lead agency in any capacity during the previous 12 months.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: A coalition that includes The Sierra Fund, the California League of Conservation Voters, Sierra Club and others focus on Section 2774 in their letter.
That section has been amended along with many provisions of the bill, and it is not known if the opposition has been removed or not.
Section 2774, dealing with inspections, is viewed by the opposition coalition as a key provision to make sure that inspections and any necessary enforcement actually occur. As originally drafted, the opposition said that the bill weakens inspections by allowing inspections only for the purpose of ensuring that operations are in compliance with the reclamation plan, rather than SMARA as a whole.
Given the amendments in Senate Appropriations, the more likely concern of the opposition remains that it is not yet crystal clear that documents from sister agencies, such as the Department of Fish and Wildlife and regional water boards, would be automatically included in reclamation plans in advance of the approval of those plans. This issue was addressed in amendments that pertain to appeals to the SMGB, but the opposition wants that same sort of outcome when local lead agencies approve reclamation plans initially. An author’s amendment would allow such conditions of approval and mitigation from sister agencies to be included in an appendix prepared within 60 days of the approval of a reclamation plan. Such provisions would then become subject to subsequent annual inspections.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 73-1, 6/4/15
AYES: Achadjian, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gonzalez, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins
NOES: Levine
NO VOTE RECORDED: Alejo, Gomez, Gordon, Nazarian, Rendon, Ting
Prepared by: William Craven / N.R. & W. / (916) 651-4116
9/1/15 22:13:42
**** END ****
AB 1142 (Gray) Page 2 of 2
SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair
2015 - 2016 Regular Session
AB 1142 (Gray) - Mining and geology: surface mining.
|
|
Version: August 18, 2015 |
Policy Vote: N.R. & W. 8 - 0 |
Urgency: No |
Mandate: Yes |
Hearing Date: August 27, 2015 |
Consultant: Marie Liu |
*********** ANALYSIS ADDENDUM – SUSPENSE FILE ***********
The following information is revised to reflect amendments
adopted by the committee on August 27, 2015
Bill Summary:
AB 1142 would establish a new process by which the director of the Department of Conservation (DOC) can review reclamation plans and financial assurances under the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act
Fiscal Impact:
Unknown costs to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Account (special) for additional review by the director of reclamation plans and financial assurances.
Author Amendments:
Require the director of DOC to report to the Legislature regarding the expenditures of the Mine Reclamation Account by December 31, 2021
Delete existing requirements regarding the lead agency’s review of a reclamation plan
Modify the basis for which a person can appeal a lead agency’s actions to the board
Modify the basis for which the director may appeal a lead agency’s approval of a financial assurance cost estimate
Modify the basis by which the board is to consider an appeal
Modify requirements regarding submission of a reclamation plan or plan amendment for review to the director
Modify the information that must be submitted to the director when a reclamation is approved
Specify the times limitations on the director’s review of financial assurances and other process requirements
Specify that an operator must provide an annual financial assurance cost estimate to the lead agency if the lead agency has not conducted an inspection by a date requested.
Specify additional inspection requirements and inspection reporting requirements.
Require the DOC to establishing a training program for all surface mine inspectors.
Specify the notification information that is required if the lead agency or director issue a notice of violation to an operator, including necessary actions to correct the violations.
Allow the director or lead agency to enter into a stipulated order to comply with a notice of violation
Specifies when violations may impact whether the operation is approved to fulfill state contracts
Adds specificity as to what situations and under what process the board may exercise some or all of lead agency’s powers including allowing the lead agency to respond to the board’s issues and allowing the lead agency to develop a remedial plan
Technical and clarifying changes
Committee Amendments:
Add contingent enactment language to SB 209 (Pavley)
-- END --
AB 1142 (Gray) Page 3 of 3
SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair
2015 - 2016 Regular Session
AB 1142 (Gray) - Mining and geology: surface mining.
|
|
Version: August 18, 2015 |
Policy Vote: N.R. & W. 8 - 0 |
Urgency: No |
Mandate: Yes |
Hearing Date: August 24, 2015 |
Consultant: Marie Liu |
This bill may meet the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.
Bill Summary:
AB 1142 would establish a new process by which the director of the Department of Conservation (DOC) can review reclamation plans and financial assurances under the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act
Fiscal Impact:
Unknown costs to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Account (special) for additional review by the director of reclamation plans and financial assurances.
Background:
The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA, PRC §2710 et seq.) regulates surface mining operations to minimize environmental impacts and to provide for the reclamation of mined lands to a usable condition while encouraging the production, conservation, and protection of the state’s mineral resources. SMARA applies to the mining of hard metals minerals, and sand and gravel. SMARA generally requires a surface mining operation to obtain a mining permit, to have an approved reclamation plan, and to have secured financial assurances. Financial assurances are surety documents that can be used to pay for any mine reclamation costs in the event that a mine operator defaults on its obligation to reclaim a mine at the end of its useful life.
The role of lead agency: SMARA is administered by the DOC’s Office of Mine Reclamation and the State Mining and Geology Board (SMGB), but allows local entities to operate as the lead agency and issue mining permits if the local entity has adopted an ordinance governing mining activities that meet specified requirements. However, reclamation plans and financial assurances must be submitted to the director DOC for review (§2774). Mines are required to be inspected annually, and are the basis for establishing financial assurance amounts.
Oversight of local agencies: Existing law establishes the procedures by which the director can submit comments to a lead agency regarding its pending approval of a reclamation plan and financial assurances and the lead agency’s required response to such comments. Individuals may appeal specific lead agency actions, including denying approval of a reclamation plan, to the SMGB (§2770(e)).
Revoking of local agency responsibilities: Existing law enables the SMGB to assume the role of the lead agency, except for local permitting authority, if the lead agency is failing to fulfill its statutory obligations, including if the lead agency approves a reclamation plan and financial assurances that are not consistent with SMARA (§2774.4). The SMGB is required to restore powers to the lead agency within three years if the lead agency takes corrective actions.
Proposed Law:
This bill would make various changes to SMARA. Specifically, this bill would, among other things:
Require reclamation plans to include a chart identifying the specific location in the plan which addresses various requirements.
Establish a process by which the director may review a reclamation plan or plan amendment. The director would have 45 from the receipt of a complete reclamation plan or plan amendment to prepare written comments. The lead agency would be required to respond in writing to the director’s comments and give a 30 day notice of its intention to approve the reclamation plan or amendment.
Establish a process by which the director may review financial assurances for a new reclamation plan or adjustments to financial assurances as a result of a plan amendment. The director would and local agency would have an unspecified amount of time to respond are review the financial assurances.
Make numerous technical and clarifying changes
Related Legislation:
SB 209 would make various changes to SMARA including raising the annual reporting fee and establishing a new process to review reclamation plans. AB 209 is currently on the Assembly Appropriations suspense file.
Staff Comments:
Under existing law, the director has the authority to review reclamation plans and financial assurances. However, if the director finds that the plan or financial assurances are insufficient, the director has few options to compel changes other than revoking the lead agency’s responsibilities under SMARA. This bill aims to improve the reviews by assuring the director receives all the necessary information in an orderly and timely fashion and by giving the director authority to submit comments to the local agencies which the local agency must respond.
By giving the director specific authorities in which he or she may review reclamation plans and financial assurance and compel necessary changes, this review is likely to be more thorough and therefore may require additional workload. The extent of the additional workload is unknown.
The authors of this bill and SB 209 are currently in discussions with the Governor’s office and various stakeholders regarding the provisions in both bills. Further amendments to this bill are likely as a result of those discussions.
-- END --
AB 1142 (Gray) Page 9 of 9
SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES AND WATER
Senator Fran Pavley, Chair
2015 - 2016 Regular
Bill No: AB 1142 Hearing Date: July 14, 2015
Author: |
Gray |
|
|
Version: |
July 1, 2015 Amended |
||
Urgency: |
No |
Fiscal: |
Yes |
Consultant: |
William Craven |
||
Subject: Mining and geology: surface mining.
BACKGROUND AND EXISTING LAW
1. The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) is the primary state statute that applies to the surface mining activities in California for both hard metals, minerals, and sand and gravel. It is administered by the Department of Conservation (DOC) , which has administratively created the Office of Mine Reclamation (OMR) as the primary mine regulator for California.
2. SMARA generally prohibits surface mining unless a permit is obtained from DOC, a reclamation plan is approved, and financial assurances have been approved. Local land use permits are also required.
3. Section 2772 generally sets forth the types of information that are to be contained in reclamation plans. This includes such features as the ownership information of the operation, the quantity and type of minerals that will be extracted, dates to initiate and terminate mining, depth of mining, legal descriptions of the property to be mined, and numerous other types of information that have been traditionally required.
4. Section 2773 directs the reclamation plan to address issues such as revegetation, erosion control, soil stability, topography, and stream characteristics. Importantly, it also directs the State Mining and Geology Board (SMGB) to promulgate reclamation standards that include wildlife habitat, stream protection, topsoil salvage, tailing and mine waste management, and a variety of other topics.
5. Section 2773.3 provides additional protections for Native American sites from hard rock mining (gold and silver).
6. Local lead agencies are generally responsible for ensuring that reclamation plans are adopted pursuant to CEQA.
6. Annual inspections of mines are conducted by the lead agency, and those inspections form the basis for surety documents (called “financial assurances” in SMARA) that can be used to pay for any mine reclamation costs in the event a mine operator defaults on the obligation to reclaim a mine at the end of its useful life. In most circumstances, the lead agency is responsible for developing an adequate financial assurances surety.
7. Normally under SMARA, the lead agency is the local land use permitting agency, although SMARA provides for SMGB to become the lead agency in cases where the local agency does not fulfill its statutory obligations. This process is quasi-judicial with appeals possible to the SMGB.
8. SMARA does not affect the local land use siting or permitting decisions by local governments. It does, however, impose administrative and compliance responsibilities on local governments in their capacity as local lead agencies.
9. SMARA is a fee-based program. Minimum fees of $100 apply to most mines, and the maximum is $4,000. The overall program costs are capped by statute at $3.5 million, adjusted for inflation. The caps on mine operators and the overall program costs have generated no increase in revenue to DOC for several years. In fact, DOC often has greater expenditure authority than available fee revenues in annual budget bills.
10. SMARA requires annual inspections, although does not specify the training that mine inspectors should have, nor does it require DOC to offer training to local lead agencies or others who may wish to inspect mines.
11. SMARA does not explicitly allow local lead agencies to inspect mines owned by those local lead agencies.
12. SMARA contains procedures for other state agencies (such as Department of Fish and Wildlife and regional water boards) to include their regulatory provisions in reclamation plans.
13. Mine inspectors are currently expected to check for compliance with all regulatory issues at the annual inspections, including those from local governments, those imposed by SMARA, and others from the Department of Fish and Wildlife and regional water boards.
14. DOC has identified many flaws in the administration of SMARA. These include the lack of inspections, inadequate financial assurances, and a labyrinthine enforcement process that is fundamentally broken.
15. Governor Brown in a signing message to recent legislation called for a “top to bottom” review of SMARA.
16. The administration convened a stakeholder group that met several times in 2015 and reviewed several SMARA-related issues. Those recommendations are completely contained in SB 209 (Pavley) and aspects of those recommendations are contained in this bill.
17. The Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee Science Fellow in 2012 identified many examples of failed SMARA implementation that involves both local and state government. Highlights of this review indicated that more than 100 closed mines have not begun reclamation, that the rate of conducting required annual inspections hovers in the 25% and 50% range for cities and counties, respectively, and that financial assurance surety documents are updated by 27 percent of the counties and only 20 percent of the cities. The data collection system of DOC has been criticized for data gaps. The Committee report was based on reported data.
PROPOSED LAW
This bill proposes numerous changes to SMARA, many of which are technical, some of which are non-controversial, and some of which should be specifically identified for the Committee’s consideration. This section will focus on the latter category of proposed changes in the order in which they appear in the bill.
1. Consistent with the Governor’s stakeholder group recommendations, this bill in Section 4 bifurcates the term “financial assurances” to mean both a current financial assurance cost estimate (FACE) and a financial assurance mechanism that is at least equal to the current approved financial assurance cost estimate. It also continues existing practice that the review of financial assurances shall not be considered a project for purposes of CEQA.
2. Section 6 of the bill amends section 2772 of the Public Resources Code which contains many of the provisions for mine reclamation plans.
The proposed amendment in Section 2772 (b) makes compliance with section 2772, 2773, and 2773.3 non-mandatory since it adds the term “as applicable” in front of those sections. These sections are described in “Existing Law” at points 3-5. This could be interpreted to mean that a reclamation plan would not be required to comply with these provisions that previously had applied to reclamation plans.
3. Amendments in section 7 of the bill (section 2772.1) would do all of the following:
a) Imply that DOC shall be responsible for completing the CEQA process for reclamation plans which under current law is undertaken by local lead agencies. See Existing Law, # 6).
b) Makes non-mandatory Sections 2772, 2773, and 2773.3 which set forth standards for reclamation plans and protections for Native American sites.
c) Suggests that variations to reclamation standards may be proposed in a technical report created by a California-licensed professional, without limitation.
d) Allows “substantial” compliance with the specified reclamation provisions;
e) Provides 15 days for the director to determine if a reclamation plan or plan amendment is complete, and 45 days after that determination to comment to the lead agency on the proposed reclamation plan.
f) Allows mitigation measures proposed by other state agencies to be excluded from the bonding requirements of a financial assurances when separate financial assurances are required by such agencies. Also seems to prohibit the use of performance requirements by other state agencies under certain circumstances. This provision is drafted very unclearly. See Comment 3.
4. Section 8 of the bill (Section 2773.1 of the Public Resources Code) would:
a) Bifurcate the financial assurances mechanism and the financial assurance cost estimate, as proposed by the Governor’s stakeholder process. It also would make other conforming amendments as proposed by the stakeholder process.
b) In a very unclear provision, it would seem to allow a financial assurance cost estimate to indirectly modify an approved reclamation plan without complying with CEQA in instances in which the financial assurance cost estimate may modify the estimate of the time needed to complete reclamation including any monitoring studies required by the reclamation plan.
5. Section 9 of the bill deals with the internal process between the lead agency and the director to approve financial assurances. This section would:
a) allow the lead agency to provide a preliminary determination to the director the financial assurance cost estimate is adequate, complete, and consistent with Section 2773.1. It excludes compliance with Article 11 of the SMGB regs and the SMGB financial guidelines.
b) It proposes time limits for the director to determine if the submission is incomplete and time limits for the director to comment.
c) It establishes a new, smaller scale separate financial assurance procedure based on the annual inspection. Timelines are proposed for the director to determine completeness and to comment.
d) This section contains several new timelines, processes, procedures for approval and commenting on financial assurances, and appeals. One noteworthy provision would allow financial assurances to be adequate if it uses specified forms adopted by the SMGB. However, it is not clear that those forms reflect the improvements in the financial assurances process sought by the administration or, indeed, whether they reflect the changes in the financial assurances process otherwise proposed in this bill.
6. Section 10 of the bill proposes significant changes to the required annual inspections.
a) Inspections would be limited to compliance with its reclamation plan, rather than to compliance with this chapter and the permit conditions imposed by other state agencies.
b) Inspections could be carried out by a licensed state geologist, license civil engineer, licensed landscape architect, licensed forester, or a lead agency employee who is experienced in land reclamation who had not been employed by the surface mining operation being inspected during the previous 12 months, except that a lead agency employee may inspect surface mining operations conducted by another department within the local agency.
c) The prescribed time to submit the inspection to the department would be extended from 30 to 90 days.
d) The director would be required to inform lead agencies of each surface mining operation within the jurisdiction of each lead agency.
e) After 2018, a lead agency employee who is not one of the licensed professionals referred to in in (b), above, is allowed to conduct inspections, and at some point must complete an inspection workshop provided by the department.
f) The section states that it does not impose qualifications or standards on employees designated by a local, state, or federal agency to perform inspections of real property under separate provisions of local, state, or federal law, including the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act, the federal Clean Water Act, or the Fish and Game Code, among others.
7. Section 11 contains a new provision that improves the administrative penalty collection procedure and has built-in due process safeguards for the operator. The department would be able to undertake collection activities itself rather than using the Attorney General, and depending on the amount of unpaid penalties, could undertake collection either in small claims or superior courts.
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT
According to the author, this bill modernizes SMARA. He notes that the Governor called for a “top to bottom” review of SMARA in signing SB 447 (Lara) in 2013. The author also acknowledges that the administrative requirements of SMARA are not being properly and fully implemented by local lead agencies including proper inspections and annual financial assurance reviews.
The author contends that the bill strengthens SMARA by ensuring better communication between local lead agencies, operators, and the department. He feels the bill sets forth appropriate and timely inspection schedules while promoting management flexibility for regulators and ensuring that operators’ compliance obligations are clear.
The author believes that the bill incorporates several of the administration’s reform concepts and he points to a list of such reforms including but not limited to: the new ability of the director to appeal the approval of a financial assurance to the SMGB, the inclusion of specified maps in the reclamation plan, clarifying the incorporation of documents and standards into reclamation plans, the provision allowing local lead agency employees to inspect mines following a workshop, a new timeline for the director to determine if a financial assurance or reclamation plan is complete, and the new provision requiring concurrence by the director with the lead agency regarding the release to the operator of the financial assurance mechanism.
A coalition headed by the California Chamber of Commerce believes the bill clarifies the duties and responsibilities of mine operators, lead agencies, and the state, as well as makes procedural improvements to the annual inspection process, the financial assurance process, the reclamation plan approval process, and other provisions of SMARA. The Chamber says that a new inspection form and requiring inspections to be performed by licensed professionals will improve the integrity of annual inspections.
As for financial assurances, the Chamber supports the provision that requires annual reviews of financial assurances to ensure that those financial assurances are adequate to reclaim the site upon the default of the operator. It also suggests that the provisions allowing the department to determine that a financial assurance is “complete” will drive local lead agencies to work harder to make sure that these financial assurances are adequate. The department is provided a new appeal right to the SMGB for inadequate financial assurance documents.
The Chamber asserts that the proposed amendment allowing various documents that comprise a reclamation plan to be displayed on a chart will allow the incorporation by reference of specified documents.
An assortment of mining companies sent in separate letters arguing that the bill modernizes and clarifies SMARA and improves communication.
The California Labor Federation indicated that it supported the bill based on a provision (since removed) that was intended to protect jobs.
RCRC supports the training provision for local government personnel to inspect mines, as well as the removal of a provision from SMARA that prohibits a state licensed professional from conducting a mine inspection for the lead agency who had been employed by any surface mining operation within the jurisdiction of the lead agency in any capacity during the previous 12 months.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION
A coalition that includes The Sierra Fund, the California League of Conservation Voters, Sierra Club and others focus on section 2774 in their letter. That section, dealing with inspections, is viewed by the coalition as a key provision to make sure that inspections and any necessary enforcement actually occur.
1. Their main points on this section:
a) The bill weakens inspections by allowing inspections only for the purpose of ensuring that operations are in compliance with the reclamation plan, rather than SMARA as a whole.
b) The bill extends the time period by 60 days for lead agencies to notify the department of the results of the inspection, thus potentially allowing a greater period of non-compliance.
c) This section eliminates the requirement for the lead agency to notify the department of the filing of a mine permit application within 30 days.
d) The proposed new financial assurance cost estimate review process requires the operator to prepare the document, rather than the lead agency. It also allows the lead agency to approve the financial assurance cost estimate prior to submitting it to the department for review.
e) The documents from sister agencies such as Fish and Wildlife and regional water boards would no longer be incorporated into a reclamation plan and thus not subject to the annual inspections.
2. This coalition believes that an industry attorney’s blog post from earlier this year confirms the view that the intent of AB 1142 is to weaken the inspection process. That blog states, “AB 1142 clarifies that mine inspectors conducting a SMARA inspection are not authorized to inspect operations for purposes of evaluating compliance with other laws including California’s clean water law, the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, or the federal Clean Water Act.” This blog was published in March by the law firm Harrison, Temblador, Hungerford, and Johnson LLP.
3. While focused primarily on Section 2774, the coalition expressed concern with other language in the bill that would fail to protect the land and the public from poorly managed mining operations.
COMMENTS
1. As noted earlier, this bill and SB 209 (Pavley) are the two main vehicles for SMARA reform. Both seek to amend many of the same sections of SMARA. In a couple of instances, both seek to amend SMARA in identical ways, based on the recommendations of the governor’s stakeholder process. Beyond that, however, the two bills are very different.
There is, of course, no requirement on a legislator to tailor a bill precisely as recommended by a governor’s stakeholder process. There are multiple ways to achieve similar objectives in this area of the law.
That said, the goal of the governor’s stakeholder process was intended to achieve a “top to bottom” review of SMARA and to recommend solutions. The stakeholder process considered topics as diverse as reclamation plans, financial assurances, inspections, mining board oversight options, fees, penalty collection, the abuse of exemptions from SMARA, and vested rights. It made recommendations on each of these topics, all of which are contained in SB 209, and a selective few of which are contained in AB 1142.
2. The most significant departures from the stakeholder recommendations are contained in the Proposed Law sections 2, 3, 5, and 6, although the approval and review procedures for financial assurances (Proposed Law, section 4) also needs significant review by the department to ensure that it is workable on a practical basis, and meets the department’s objectives, even if the author chooses to adopt a different approach from the stakeholder group language. Section 9 of the bill needs to be amended to add the regulations and Financial Guidelines of the SMGB, and, as with Section 4, to make sure that the new proposed procedures are workable on a practical basis while meeting the department’s objectives.
Proposed Law sections 2,3,5, and 6 would do all of the following if those provisions become effective:
a) The proposed amendment in Section 2772 (b) makes compliance with section 2772, 2773, and 2773.3 non-mandatory since it adds the term “as applicable” in front of those sections. These are the provisions that define the information that is included in reclamation plans, the issues that are to be addressed, including soil stability and revegetation, both of which are key to public safety, water quality, and the ultimate successful reclamation of a site. The reclamation standards of the SGMB would be excluded. These protect wildlife habitat and deal with tailing and mine waste management among other topics. The provision for protection of Native American sites would no longer be mandatory.
b) Allows “substantial” rather than complete compliance with reclamation plans; suggests that DOC shall be responsible for completing the CEQA process for reclamation plans rather than lead agencies; and repeats the language making non-mandatory the points identified in (a) set forth above. There is language to the effect that reclamation plans can be altered any circumstances which needs to be deleted or at least qualified.
c) Allows mitigation measures proposed by other state agencies to be excluded from the bonding requirements of a financial assurances when separate financial assurances are required by such agencies. Also seems to prohibit the use of performance requirements by other state agencies under certain circumstances. This provision is drafted very unclearly and is repeated here as in indication of how convoluted the drafting is in many places in this bill: “To the extent those conditions of approval and mitigation measures are not subject to separate lead agency or other state or federal agency bonding or performance requirements, those conditions and measures shall be subject to the financial assurances requirements of this article.”
3. As an aside, one of the goals of the SMARA reform, in the minds of the opposition to AB 1142 and many of the stakeholders who participated in the Governor’s process, is to make the law accessible to the general public. The sentence quoted above would not satisfy that goal. Moreover, it raises the substantive question of the appropriate consideration of performance requirements that may be imposed by other agencies. It is just an example of the many drafting issues in the current version of the bill that would confound a member of the public trying to understand state mining law.
4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends that the bill be amended to rectify all of the problems raised in Comment 2 and other technical issues that exist elsewhere in the bill. Assuming the author agrees with this first step, staff would recommend that the Committee encourage the author to commence further negotiations with the department, the administration, and other stakeholders. At the same time, the author may want to consider engaging with the author of SB 209 to determine if some sort of successful collaboration can be achieved.
The technical issues include, for example, moving the remnant of 2770(c) into 2773.4 that deals with the renewals of financial assurances, a review with the department of various proposed timelines, new procedures, incorporated documents, and deadlines for commenting on financial assurances and proposed or amended reclamation plans, appeals, and the qualifications of those who inspect mines. To facilitate a discussion on such issues, staff is recommending that the deadlines proposed in Section 7 and 9 be left as blanks that can be restored at a later date as part of a larger discussion of these technical issues. These amendments should not be interpreted to foreclose other technical issues raised by the department or other stakeholders that are offered as ways to make this bill function as well as possible and that are accepted by the author.
SUPPORT
A. Teichert & Son
Associated Builders and Contractors of California
California Asphalt Pavement Association
California Building Industry Association
California Business Properties Association
California Chamber of Commerce
California Construction and Industrial Materials Association
California Independent Petroleum Association
California Labor Federation
California Manufacturers & Technology Association
CalPortland Company
CEMEX
Chemical Industry Council of California
Fullerton chamber of Commerce
George Reed, Inc.
Granite Construction Co
Granite Rock Company
Lehigh Hanson
National Federation of Independent Businesses
P.W. Gillibrand Co., Inc.
Robertson’s
Rural County Representatives of California
Searles Valley Minerals
Southwest California Legislative Council
Southwest California Legislative Council
Specialty Minerals Inc.
Superior Ready Mix Concrete
The Associated General Contractors
United Contractors
Vulcan Materials Company
OPPOSITION
Azul
Sierra Club California
California League of Conservation Voters
California Native Plant Society
Center for Biological Diversity
Claim-GV
Clean Water Action
Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation
Endangered Habitats League
Environment California
Environmental Justice Coalition for Water
Environmental Working Group
The Sierra Fund
San Juan Ridge Taxpayers Association
Trout Unlimited
Wholly H20
Wolf Creek Community Alliance
-- END --
AB 1142
Page 4
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
AB 1142
(Gray)
As Amended June 3, 2015
Majority vote
Committee |
Votes |
Ayes |
Noes |
Natural Resources |
9-0 |
Williams, Dahle, Cristina Garcia, Hadley, Harper, McCarty, Rendon, Mark Stone, Wood |
|
Appropriations |
17-0 |
Gomez, Bigelow, Bonta, Calderon, Chang, Daly, Eggman, Gallagher, Eduardo Garcia, Gordon, Holden, Jones, Quirk, Rendon, Wagner, Weber, Wood |
|
SUMMARY: Makes numerous and significant changes to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA). Specifically, this bill:
Requires a surface mine operator to request a date for their next annual inspection as part of their annual report. If the operator does not request an inspection date or the lead agency is unable to inspect on the requested date, requires the lead agency to provide a minimum five days written notice of a pending inspection or a date that is agreed upon by the operator. Deletes the requirement for a lead agency to conduct an inspection within six months of receipt of the report and instead requires annual inspections.
Requires the Department of Conservation (DOC) Director (Director) to provide workshops on mine inspections and lead agency employees to take the workshops. Allows a lead agency employee who is a qualified mine inspector to inspect a surface mine operation conducted by another department within the local agency.
Creates a new financial assurance cost estimate (FACE) process and requires the operator to provide the FACE to the DOC and the lead agency for review. Requires the lead agency to review the FACE for adequacy and completeness and submit the FACE to the Director for review with a preliminary determination of whether it is adequate and complete.
Allows DOC to comment on the FACE. Allows the lead agency to evaluate DOC's comments and provide a response to the comments. Requires the lead agency to accept or reject the FACE within 60 days of receipt of DOC's comments or the due date for the comments, if comments are not received. Creates an appeal process and timelines if the lead agency determines the FACE is inadequate.
By April 1 of each year, requires DOC to provide each lead agency with a notice listing each active or idle surface mining operation within the lead agency's jurisdiction. By July 1 of each year, requires the lead agency to provide the Director with specified information. Requires DOC to request similar information on any new or omitted operations.
Allows the Director or California State Mining and Geology Board (Board) to apply to the small claims court or superior court to collect unpaid administrative penalties.
EXISTING LAW:
Creates SMARA, which prohibits a person from conducting surface mining operations unless the lead agency for the operation issues a surface mining permit and approves a reclamation plan and financial assurances for reclamation. Depending on the circumstances, a lead agency can be a city, county, the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, or the Board. However, reclamation plans and financial assurances must be submitted to the Director of the DOC for review.
Provides a mechanism by which the Board can strip a local agency of its lead agency status for its failure to implement state law, the Board then serves as the lead agency.
Requires the Board to adopt regulations that establish state policy for the reclamation of mined lands in accordance with the intent of SMARA.
Requires lead agencies to require financial assurances of each surface mining operation to ensure reclamation is performed in accordance with the surface mining operation's approved reclamation plan.
Requires the financial assurance to remain in effect for the duration of the surface mining operation and until the reclamation is complete. Requires the amount of financial assurance to be adjusted annually to account for new lands disturbed by surface mining operations, inflation, and reclamation of lands accomplished in accordance with the approved reclamation plan.
Requires the lead agencies to conduct annual mine inspections to determine compliance with SMARA.
FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee:
Increased DOC costs of $1 million or more to develop a new database to fulfill new form and notification requirements (General Fund (GF) or special fund).
According to DOC, a new data collection system that incorporates the electronic filing of documents is necessary to meet the requirements of the bill. Annual reports, financial assurance cost estimates, reclamation plan amendments and permit amendments would all need to be filed online by the lead agency to enable the database to provide form letters based upon the information submitted by the lead agency. Due to state information technology procurement requirements, it is not feasible to procure an updated database management system and meet the deadlines of the bill.
Initial DOC costs of approximately $775,000 for the first year to review and organize existing files, coordinate with the lead agency to obtain missing information and document reclamation plan requirements (GF or special fund).
Ongoing annual DOC costs of approximately $500,000 to review the reclamation plan, check for any updates to the reclamation plan and associated permits, review inspection and annual reports, and examine Geographic Information Systems data for each operation that submits a financial assurance cost estimate (GF or special fund).
COMMENTS:
Governor's stakeholder group. SMARA was passed into law in 1975 and its intent remains unchanged. SMARA states:
It is the intent of the Legislature to create and maintain an effective and comprehensive surface mining and reclamation policy with regulation of surface mining operations so as to assure that:
a) Adverse environmental effects are prevented or minimized and that mined lands are reclaimed to a usable condition which is readily adaptable for alternative land uses.
b) The production and conservation of minerals are encouraged, while giving consideration to values relating to recreation, watershed, wildlife, range and forage, and aesthetic enjoyment.
c) Residual hazards to the public health and safety are eliminated.
As stated above, the Governor has called for a top to bottom review of SMARA. The goal of these talks is to amend SMARA to meet its intent. Multiple stakeholder group meetings have been held to discuss the administration's concerns with SMARA. Issues that are under discussion include:
Meaningful reclamation of disturbed mine lands;
Adequate financial assurance;
Financial assurances are not released until reclamation is complete;
Financial assurance can be used for reclamation if the mine owner does not reclaim their mine;
Annual, quality inspections of mine occur;
When inspectors find non-compliance enforcement is clear, timely, and meaningful;
The Board has tools to improve local SMARA implementation;
Reporting fees and penalties are paid by operators and that fees cover the cost of the program; and,
Inappropriate exemptions from SMARA are stopped.
The language currently in this bill differs significantly from the SMARA reform language released by DOC. DOC is currently getting comments on its draft language from the Governor's stakeholder group.
Reclamation. There are over a thousand active mines in California that remove aggregate for building material, metals, and minerals. California is the only state in the United States where surface mine reclamation is not regulated by the state. Local governments including cities and counties are the lead agencies for most mines. However, DOC and the Board oversee their permitting, inspection, and enforcement actions. Mining operators are required under SMARA to develop and implement reclamation plans, which will return the mine to a condition where it can be used for another purpose after the mining operation is complete. Annual reports and inspections are supposed to ensure that mining operators are making progress to reclamation. However, there are instances when the mine operator cannot be located or is unable to complete the mine reclamation. Financial assurances are required to make sure there will be resources available to reclaim the mine. The state and lead agencies have an interest in properly reclaimed mines, because a surface mine is a large hole in the ground and can have many dangerous features. If the mine is reclaimed, the land can be returned to another use. If it is not, the state or the lead agency could be responsible for protecting the public from the dangers of the mine, cleaning up the mine, and reclaiming the mine.
Analysis Prepared by: Michael Jarred / NAT. RES. / (916) 319-2092 FN: 0000907
AB 1142
Page 4
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
AB 1142
(Gray)
As Amended May 5, 2015
Majority vote
Committee |
Votes |
Ayes |
Noes |
Natural Resources |
9-0 |
Williams, Dahle, Cristina Garcia, Hadley, Harper, McCarty, Rendon, Mark Stone, Wood |
|
Appropriations |
17-0 |
Gomez, Bigelow, Bonta, Calderon, Chang, Daly, Eggman, Gallagher, Eduardo Garcia, Gordon, Holden, Jones, Quirk, Rendon, Wagner, Weber, Wood |
|
SUMMARY: Makes numerous and significant changes to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA). Specifically, this bill:
Requires a surface mine operator to request a date for their next annual inspection as part of their annual report. If the operator does not request an inspection date or the lead agency is unable to inspect on the requested date, requires the lead agency to provide a minimum 30 days written notice of a pending inspection or a date that is agreed upon by the operator. Deletes the requirement for a lead agency to conduct an inspection within six months of receipt of the report and instead requires annual inspections.
Requires a mine inspection to be conducted by a state licensed geologist, state licensed civil engineer, state licensed landscape architect, state licensed forester, or a qualified mine inspector trained through the curriculum developed by the bill. Allows a lead agency employee who is a qualified mine inspector to inspect a surface mine operation conducted by another department within the local agency.
Creates a new financial assurance cost estimate (FACE) process and requires the operator to provide the FACE to the Department of Conservation (DOC) and the lead agency for review. Allows DOC to comment on the FACE. Allows the lead agency to evaluate DOC’s comments and provide a response to the comments. Requires the lead agency to accept or reject the FACE within 60 days of receipt of DOC’s comments or the due date for the comments, if comments are not received. Creates an appeal process and timelines if the lead agency determines the FACE is inadequate.
By April 1 of each year, requires DOC to provide each lead agency with a notice listing each active or idle surface mining operation within the lead agency’s jurisdiction. By July 1 of each year, requires the lead agency to provide the DOC Director with specified information. Requires DOC to request similar information on any new or omitted operations.
Requires the form provided by DOC to include all of DOC’s current information for each operation.
Allows the DOC Director or Board to apply to the small claims court or superior court to collect unpaid administrative penalties.
EXISTING LAW:
Creates SMARA, which prohibits a person from conducting surface mining operations unless the lead agency for the operation issues a surface mining permit and approves a reclamation plan and financial assurances for reclamation. Depending on the circumstances, a lead agency can be a city, county, the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, or the California State Mining and Geology Board (Board). However, reclamation plans and financial assurances must be submitted to the Director of the Department of Conservation (DOC) for review.
Provides a mechanism by which the Board can strip a local agency of its lead agency status for its failure to implement state law, the Board then serves as the lead agency.
Requires the Board to adopt regulations that establish state policy for the reclamation of mined lands in accordance with the intent of SMARA.
Requires lead agencies to require financial assurances of each surface mining operation to ensure reclamation is performed in accordance with the surface mining operation's approved reclamation plan.
Requires the financial assurance to remain in effect for the duration of the surface mining operation and until the reclamation is complete. Requires the amount of financial assurance to be adjusted annually to account for new lands disturbed by surface mining operations, inflation, and reclamation of lands accomplished in accordance with the approved reclamation plan.
Requires the lead agencies to conduct annual mine inspections to determine compliance with SMARA.
FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee:
Increased DOC costs of $1 million or more to develop a new database to fulfill new form and notification requirements (GF or special fund).
According to DOC, a new data collection system that incorporates the electronic filing of documents is necessary to meet the requirements of the bill. Annual reports, financial assurance cost estimates, reclamation plan amendments and permit amendments would all need to be filed online by the lead agency to enable the database to provide form letters based upon the information submitted by the lead agency. Due to state information technology procurement requirements, it is not feasible to procure an updated database management system and meet the deadlines of the bill.
Initial DOC costs of approximately $775,000 for the first year to review and organize existing files, coordinate with the lead agency to obtain missing information and document reclamation plan requirements (GF or special fund).
Ongoing annual DOC costs of approximately $500,000 to review the reclamation plan, check for any updates to the reclamation plan and associated permits, review inspection and annual reports, and examine GIS data for each operation that submits a financial assurance cost estimate (GF or special fund).
COMMENTS:
Governor’s stakeholder group. SMARA was passed into law in 1975 and its intent remains unchanged. SMARA states:
It is the intent of the Legislature to create and maintain an effective and comprehensive surface mining and reclamation policy with regulation of surface mining operations so as to assure that:
a) Adverse environmental effects are prevented or minimized and that mined lands are reclaimed to a usable condition which is readily adaptable for alternative land uses.
b) The production and conservation of minerals are encouraged, while giving consideration to values relating to recreation, watershed, wildlife, range and forage, and aesthetic enjoyment.
c) Residual hazards to the public health and safety are eliminated.
As stated above, the Governor has called for a top to bottom review of SMARA. The goal of these talks is to amend SMARA to meet its intent. Multiple stakeholder group meetings have been held to discuss the administration’s concerns with SMARA. Issues that are under discussion include:
Meaningful reclamation of disturbed mine lands;
Adequate financial assurance;
Financial assurances are not released until reclamation is complete;
Financial assurance can be used for reclamation if the mine owner does not reclaim their mine;
Annual, quality inspections of mine occur;
When inspectors find non-compliance enforcement is clear, timely, and meaningful;
The Board has tools to improve local SMARA implementation;
Reporting fees and penalties are paid by operators and that fees cover the cost of the program; and,
Inappropriate exemptions from SMARA are stopped.
The language currently in AB 1142 differs significantly from the SMARA reform language released by DOC. DOC is currently getting comments on its draft language from the Governor’s stakeholder group.
Reclamation. There are over a thousand active mines in California that remove aggregate for building material, metals, and minerals. California is the only state in the United States where surface mine reclamation is not regulated by the state. Local governments including cities and counties are the lead agencies for most mines. However, DOC and the Board oversee their permitting, inspection, and enforcement actions. Mining operators are required under SMARA to develop and implement reclamation plans, which will return the mine to a condition where it can be used for another purpose after the mining operation is complete. Annual reports and inspections are supposed to ensure that mining operators are making progress to reclamation. However, there are instances when the mine operator cannot be located or is unable to complete the mine reclamation. Financial assurances are required to make sure there will be resources available to reclaim the mine. The state and lead agencies have an interest in properly reclaimed mines, because a surface mine is a large hole in the ground and can have many dangerous features. If the mine is reclaimed, the land can be returned to another use. If it is not, the state or the lead agency could be responsible for protecting the public from the dangers of the mine, cleaning up the mine, and reclaiming the mine.
Analysis Prepared by: Michael Jarred / NAT. RES. / (916) 319-2092 FN: 0000764
AB 1142
Page 3
Date of Hearing: May 27, 2015
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Jimmy Gomez, Chair
AB 1142
(Gray) – As Amended May 5, 2015
Policy Committee: |
Natural Resources |
Vote: |
9 - 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY:
This bill modifies the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA). Specifically, this bill:
Requires a surface mine operator to request a date for their next annual inspection as part of their annual report. If the operator does not request an inspection date or the lead agency is unable to inspect on the requested date, requires the lead agency to provide a minimum 30 days written notice of a pending inspection or a date that is agreed upon by the operator. Deletes the requirement for a lead agency to conduct an inspection within six months of receipt of the report and instead requires annual inspections.
Requires a mine inspection to be conducted by a state licensed geologist, state licensed civil engineer, state licensed landscape architect, state licensed forester, or a qualified mine inspector trained through the curriculum developed by the bill. Allows a lead agency employee who is a qualified mine inspector to inspect a surface mine operation conducted by another department within the local agency.
Creates a new financial assurance cost estimate (FACE) process and requires the operator to provide the FACE to the Department of Conservation (DOC) and the lead agency for review. Allows DOC to comment on the FACE. Allows the lead agency to evaluate DOC’s comments and provide a response to the comments. Requires the lead agency to accept or reject the FACE within 60 days of receipt of DOC’s comments or the due date for the comments, if comments are not received. Creates an appeal process and timelines if the lead agency determines the FACE is inadequate.
By April 1 of each year, requires DOC to provide each lead agency with a notice listing each active or idle surface mining operation within the lead agency’s jurisdiction. By July 1 of each year, requires the lead agency to provide the DOC Director with specified information. Requires DOC to request similar information on any new or omitted operations.
Requires the form provided by DOC to include all of DOC’s current information for each operation.
Allows the DOC Director or Board to apply to the small claims court or superior court to collect unpaid administrative penalties.
FISCAL EFFECT:
Increased DOC costs of $1 million or more to develop a new database to fulfill new form and notification requirements (GF or special fund).
According to DOC, a new data collection system that incorporates the electronic filing of documents is necessary to meet the requirements of the bill. Annual reports, financial assurance cost estimates, reclamation plan amendments and permit amendments would all need to be filed online by the lead agency to enable the database to provide form letters based upon the information submitted by the lead agency. Due to state information technology procurement requirements, it is not feasible to procure an updated database management system and meet the deadlines of the bill.
Initial DOC costs of approximately $775,000 for the first year to review and organize existing files, coordinate with the lead agency to obtain missing information and document reclamation plan requirements (GF or special fund).
Ongoing annual DOC costs of approximately $500,000 to review the reclamation plan, check for any updates to the reclamation plan and associated permits, review inspection and annual reports, and examine GIS data for each operation that submits a financial assurance cost estimate (GF or special fund).
SMARA is funded through a variety of sources. The Mine Reclamation Account (MRA) receives revenue from two sources: 1) a $14 daily fee paid by mines in cities and counties where the SMGB acts as the lead agency; and 2) annual regulatory fees paid by mine operators (reporting fees). Total annual revenue from the daily fee is about $180,000. For the reporting fees, DOC is required to adopt a fee schedule designed to cover its cost in carrying out the act, including reclamation plan and financial assurance review, mine inspection, and enforcement.
However, existing law establishes annual caps on reporting fees for both an individual mine operator (about $5,000 in 2014–15) and total reporting fee revenue (about $4.5 million in 2014–15). Individual mine reporting fees are based on the total value of the minerals extracted. Both caps are adjusted annually for inflation. In 2015–16, total mine reporting fee revenue is expected be $3.5 million, roughly $1 million less than the cap.
The Surface Mining and Reclamation Account (SMARA) is funded by a portion of royalties collected from mining activities on federal land. Under state law, the first $2 million provided to California is deposited in the SMARA, to be used to administer the Act. The remaining federal mining revenues provided to California—estimated to be $93 million in 2015–16—are used to fund K–14 education.
The Bosco–Keene Renewable Resources Investment Fund (RRIF) receives 30% ($1.2 million in 2015–16) of the royalties provided to the state from geothermal leases on federal lands. The remaining federal royalties go to local agencies (40%) and the California Energy Commission (30%), to support geothermal related activities, including exploration, research, and development activities.
This bill increases expenditures to an extent that would require the MRA cap to be increased through statute in order to cover costs. Other alternatives include transferring funds from a portion of the SMARA account (which is currently funding K-14 education), the RRIF (if appropriate) or the General Fund.
COMMENTS:
Purpose. According to the author, SMARA was first adopted in 1975 and underwent significant revisions in the early 1990s, and more modest revisions to address implementation challenges in recent years.
The administration has convened a stakeholder process to identify the potential issues within SMARA that may require legislative action. This bill proposes solutions to multiple identified issues. According to the author, this bill should move forward while the stakeholder process continues.
Background. There are over a thousand active mines in California that remove aggregate for building material, metals, and minerals. Unlike any other state, most surface mines in California are regulated by local government agencies.
The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA) prohibits a person from conducting surface mining operations unless the lead agency for the operation issues a surface mining permit and approves a reclamation plan and financial assurances.
Mining operators are required, under SMARA, to develop and implement reclamation plans, which will return the mine to a condition where it can be used for another purpose after the mining operation is complete. DOC and the Board of Mining and Geology oversee lead agency permitting, inspection and enforcement actions.
SMARA review and update. The Governor has called for a top to bottom review of SMARA. Multiple stakeholder group meetings have been held to discuss the administration’s concerns with SMARA. Issues that are under discussion include:
Meaningful reclamation of disturbed mine lands;
Adequate financial assurance;
Reclamation must be complete before financial assurances are released.
Financial assurance may be used for reclamation if the mine owner does not reclaim the mine;
Annual, quality inspections of every mine occur;
When inspectors find non-compliance enforcement is clear, timely, and meaningful;
The Board has tools to improve local SMARA implementation;
Reporting fees and penalties are paid by operators and fees cover the cost of the program;
Inappropriate exemptions from SMARA are eliminated.
On April 15, 2015, DOC developed legislative language to improve the quality of reclamation plans in order to assist lead agencies and DOC with reviews and inspections. The group continues to meet to address remaining issues.
Analysis Prepared by: Jennifer Galehouse / APPR. / (916) 319-2081
AB 1142
Page 8
Date of Hearing: April 27, 2015
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES
Das Williams, Chair
AB 1142
(Gray) – As Amended April 6, 2015
SUBJECT: Mining and geology: surface mining
SUMMARY: Makes numerous and significant changes to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA).
EXISTING LAW:
Creates SMARA, which prohibits a person from conducting surface mining operations unless the lead agency for the operation issues a surface mining permit and approves a reclamation plan and financial assurances for reclamation. Depending on the circumstances, a lead agency can be a city, county, the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, or the California State Mining and Geology Board (Board). However, reclamation plans and financial assurances must be submitted to the Director of the Department of Conservation (DOC) for review.
Provides a mechanism by which the Board can strip a local agency of its lead agency status for its failure to implement state law, the Board then serves as the lead agency.
Requires the Board to adopt regulations that establish state policy for the reclamation of mined lands in accordance with the intent of SMARA.
Requires lead agencies to require financial assurances of each surface mining operation to ensure reclamation is performed in accordance with the surface mining operation’s approved reclamation plan.
Requires the financial assurance to remain in effect for the duration of the surface mining operation and until the reclamation is complete. Requires the amount of financial assurance to be adjusted annually to account for new lands disturbed by surface mining operations, inflation, and reclamation of lands accomplished in accordance with the approved reclamation plan.
Requires the lead agencies to conduct annual mine inspections to determine compliance with SMARA.
Prohibits a state or local agency from acquiring or utilizing sand, gravel, aggregates, or other mineral products from surface mining operations unless the operation is identified on the AB 3098 List (a reference to the 1992 bill that established the list), which identifies all of the following surface mining operations:
Surface mining operations for which a report has been submitted to DOC that indicates that: (1) a reclamation plan and financial assurances have been approved pursuant to SMARA; (2) the operations are in compliance with the state's reclamation standards; (3) the operations are in compliance with the state's financial assurance guidelines; and, (4) the annual reporting fee has been submitted to DOC;
Surface mining operations for which an appeal is pending before the Board, provided that the appeal has not been pending before the Board for more than 180 days; and,
Surface mining operations for which an inspection is required and for which an inspection notice has been submitted by the lead agency that indicates both compliance with the approved reclamation plan and that sufficient financial assurances have been approved and secured.
Allows, until January 1, 2019, a surface mine operator whose operations are not in compliance with its approved reclamation plan to remain on the AB 3098 list if the operator stipulated to an order to comply with the lead agency and or DOC.
THIS BILL:
Requires a surface mine operator, as part of their annual report, to request a date for their next annual inspection. If the operator does not request an inspection date or the lead agency is unable to inspect on that date, the lead agency shall provide a minimum 30 days written notice of a pending inspection or a date that is agreed upon by the operator.
Removes the January 1, 2019 sunset on the provision allowing surface mining operators, whose operations are not in compliance with its approved reclamation plan, to remain on the AB 3098 list if the operator stipulated to an order to comply with the lead agency and/or DOC.
Prohibits adjustment of financial assurances that are in excess of the of the amount determined necessary to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operation’s approved reclamation plan.
Codifies regulations dealing with the modification or release of financial assurance and narrows the review of the surface mining operation to the approved reclamation plan instead of allowing for review of whether the plan meets reclamation plan standards and whether the surface mining operator is complying with the other requirements and intent of SMARA.
Allows an operator to request the lead agency and the Director to jointly inspect and review a request for full or partial release of a financial assurance instrument and sets a timeline for the inspection of 90 days after the request with a requirement for a decision on the request 45 days after the inspection.
Deletes requirement that lead agency conduct an inspection within six months of receipt of the surface mining operation report and instead requires inspections annually. Limits inspection to compliance with its reclamation plan instead of compliance with the reclamation plan and with the other requirements and intent of SMARA.
Requires a mine inspection to be conducted by a state licensed geologist, state licensed civil engineer, state licensed landscape architect, state licensed forester, or a qualified mine inspector trained through the curriculum developed by the bill. Allows a lead agency employee who is a qualified mine inspector to inspect a surface mine operation conducted by another department within the local agency.
Creates a new financial assurance cost estimate (FACE) process where the operator provides the FACE to DOC and the lead agency for review. Allows DOC to comment on the FACE. Allows the lead agency to evaluate DOC’s comments and provide a response to the comments. Requires the lead agency to accept or reject the FACE within 60 days of receipt of the DOC’s comments or the due date for the comments, if comments are not received. Creates an appeal process and timelines if the lead agency determines the FACE is inadequate.
Requires, no later than April 1 of each year, DOC to provide each lead agency with a notice listing each active or idle surface mining operation within the lead agency’s jurisdiction.
Requires, no later than July 1 of each year, the lead agency to provide the Director with the following information for each surface mine operation:
A copy of any permit or reclamation plan amendments.
A statement that there have been no changes during the previous year, as applicable.
The date of each surface mining operation’s last inspection.
The date of each surface mining operation’s last FACE review.
Requires DOC to request similar information on any new or omitted operations.
Requires the form provided by DOC to include all of DOC’s current information for each operation.
Exempts the review and approval of FACE from the California Environmental Quality Act.
Allows the surface mine operator to fulfill the inspection requirement with a third party selected by the operator if the lead agency has not inspected the mine on the inspection date requested or provided a 30 day-notice of a pending inspection.
Requires the State Geologist, in coordination with the Director, Board, lead agencies, and interested parties, to develop a curriculum for training mine inspectors.
Prohibits mine inspectors from inspecting mines for purposes of evaluating compliance with local, state, or federal law besides SMARA including, but not limited to the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, the federal Clean Water Act, and the Fish and Game Code.
Requires the lead agency, DOC, and the Board to take into account and seek to minimize the impact of any proposed enforcement action on the number of existing jobs supported directly or indirectly by the operation.
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown
COMMENTS:
Author’s statement.
SMARA was first adopted in 1975 and underwent significant revisions in the early 1990s and more modest revisions to address implementation challenges in recent years. Recently concerns have arisen that the checks and balances of the system may not be working properly and the Governor, in signing SB 447 (Lara, 2013) called for a “top to bottom” review of the Act.
The administration has recently convened a stakeholder process to identify the potential issues within SMARA that may require legislative action. AB 1142 (Gray) proposes solutions to multiple identified issues. While the stakeholder process continues, AB 1142 should move forward and may be amended to include further identified solutions.
Governor’s stakeholder group. SMARA was passed into law in 1975 and its intent remains unchanged. SMARA states:
It is the intent of the Legislature to create and maintain an effective and comprehensive surface mining and reclamation policy with regulation of surface mining operations so as to assure that:
(a) Adverse environmental effects are prevented or minimized and that mined lands are reclaimed to a usable condition which is readily adaptable for alternative land uses.
(b) The production and conservation of minerals are encouraged, while giving consideration to values relating to recreation, watershed, wildlife, range and forage, and aesthetic enjoyment.
(c) Residual hazards to the public health and safety are eliminated.
As stated above, the Governor has called for a top to bottom review of SMARA. The goal of these talks is to amend SMARA to meet its intent. Multiple stakeholder group meetings have been held to discuss the administration’s concerns with SMARA. Issues that are under discussion include:
Meaningful reclamation of disturbed mine lands;
Adequate financial assurance;
Financial assurances are not released until reclamation is complete;
Financial assurance can be used for reclamation if the mine owner does not reclaim their mine;
Annual, quality inspections of mine occur;
When inspectors find non-compliance enforcement is clear, timely, and meaningful;
The Board has tools to improve local SMARA implementation;
Reporting fees and penalties are paid by operators and that fees cover the cost of the program; and,
Inappropriate exemptions from SMARA are stopped.
On April 15, 2015, DOC developed language that they assert will improve the quality of reclamation plans, which will assist lead agencies and the DOC in both the review and inspection checklist process. Language on the other issues will be developed over time.
Parts of AB 1142 would run counter to the direction the Governor’s stakeholder group is headed by making several changes that would result less meaningful reclamation, inadequate financial assurance, a reduction in the quality of inspection and meaningful enforcement.
Reclamation. There are over a thousand active mines in California that remove aggregate for building material, metals, and minerals. California is the only state in the U.S. where surface mine reclamation is not regulated by the state. Local governments including cities and counties are the lead agencies for most mines. However, DOC and the Board oversee their permitting, inspection, and enforcement actions. Mining operators are required under SMARA to develop and implement reclamation plans, which will return the mine to a condition where it can be used for another purpose after the mining operation is complete. Annual reports and inspections are supposed to ensure that mining operators are making progress to reclamation. However, there are instances when the mine operator cannot be located or is unable to complete the mine reclamation. Financial assurances are required to make sure there will be resources available to reclaim the mine. The state and lead agencies have an interest in properly reclaimed mines, because a surface mine is a large hole in the ground and can have many dangerous features. If the mine is reclaimed, the land can be returned to another use. If it is not, the state or the lead agency could be responsible for protecting the public from the dangers of the mine, cleaning up the mine, and reclaiming the mine.
AB 1142 would prohibit adjustment of financial assurances that are in excess of the of the amount determined necessary to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operation’s approved reclamation plan and limit the review of the financial assurance by the lead agency. This would stop a lead agency from increasing financial assurances to cover new conditions such as if the mine was deeper or wider than the approved reclamation plan allowed. Lead agencies would also not be able to increase the financial assurance to cover increases in the prevailing wage. AB 1142 would also prohibit lead agencies from considering whether the reclamation plan is sufficient and if the mine is violating any other requirements of SMARA before releasing the financial assurances.
Inspections. Lead agencies are required to annually inspect mines to ensure they are complying with their permits, reclamation plan, and SMARA. Permit conditions imposed by a regional water quality control board or the Department or Fish and Wildlife, which can include requirements that deal with water quality issues and streambed alterations can be included in a SMARA permit. In addition, mine inspectors are the inspectors most often in the mine and the last inspector in the mine before it closes. Often mine inspectors play a vital role in ensuring compliance with other environmental laws. However, lead agencies in the past have not always inspected mine frequently. AB 1142 sets up a process for operators to request a date for a mine inspection and sets up a training component for mine inspectors. However, AB 1142 also allows mine operators to inspect their own mines and prohibits mine inspectors from looking at compliance with other important environmental laws.
Enforcement. The largest compliance problem DOC faces is that many mines do not file annual reports or pay their fees. Most lead agencies do not take enforcement actions except in rare egregious cases. According to one lead agency, last year all of their 10 compliance orders were settled prior to a public hearing. However, the administration has stated that when inspections indicated non-compliance, the problems identified are often never fixed. It is important that lead agencies have the tools to bring mines into compliance. SB 447, until 2019, allows surface mine operators whose operations are not in compliance with its approved reclamation plan to remain on the AB 3098 list if the operator stipulated to an order to comply with the lead agency and or DOC. AB 1142 proposes to make SB 447 permanent. However, there is not one example of this provision being used. Prior to removing the sunset on this provision, it is important to judge whether this provision improves compliance with SMARA.
AB 1142 also proposes to make lead agencies take into account and seek to minimize the impact of any proposed enforcement action on the number of existing jobs supported directly or indirectly by the surface mining operation. Surface mines operations are important to many economies and most lead agencies only use enforcement as a last resort. If an operation is seriously out of compliance, lead agencies should enforce on that operation. This provision could lead to larger mines with many employees taking compliance with SMARA less seriously than smaller mines. This also results in a precedent where public health is pitted against employment. The goal of SMARA should be to have sufficient mines in California to meet the state’s demand for aggregate, metals, and minerals, that those mines are removing material in an environmentally responsible way, and that the mine’s disturbed lands are reclaimed and returned to good use. Compliance with SMARA is the only way that will happen.
Related and Prior legislation.
SB 209 (Pavley) makes numerous and significant changes to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA). This bill is awaiting hearing in the Senate Appropriations Committee.
SB 1270 (Pavely, 2013) would create the Division of Mines within DOC, which would be responsible for the DOC’s role under mining laws, and would amend the roles of the State Mining and Geology Board so that it is an appeals and rule-making body. This bill was held in the Senate Appropriations Committee.
SB 447 (Lara), Chapter 417, Statutes of 2013, allows, until January 1, 2019, a surface mine operator whose operations are not in compliance with its approved reclamation plan, to remain on the AB 3098 list if the operator stipulated to an order to comply with the lead agency and or DOC.
Suggested Amendments. The author and committee may wish to consider to following amendments to resolve the concerns listed above:
Remove the deletion of the January 1, 2019 sunset on the provision allowing surface mining operators whose operations are not in compliance with its approved reclamation plan to remain on the AB 3098 list if the operator stipulated to an order to comply with the lead agency and or DOC.
Remove the language from Section 2773.1 that states, “An operator shall not be required to adjust financial assurances that are in excess of the amount determined necessary to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operation’s approved reclamation plan” and insert, “An operator shall only be required to replace a financial assurance mechanism already in place to bond for the reclamation of the surface mining operation where the Financial Assurance Cost Estimate identifies a need to increase the amount of the financial assurance mechanism.”
Remove Sec. 5 (Section 2773.11) from the bill.
In Section 2774, remove the minimum 30-day written notice of a pending inspection and replace with a 5-day notice.
Remove the language from Section 2774 that states, “An operator shall not be required to adjust financial assurances that are in excess of the amount determined necessary to perform reclamation in accordance with the surface mining operation’s approved reclamation plan provided that financial assurance mechanism remains in effect” and insert, “An operator shall only be required to replace a financial assurance mechanism already in place to bond for the reclamation of the surface mining operation where the Financial Assurance Cost Estimate identifies a need to increase the amount of the financial assurance mechanism.”
Remove the language from Section 2774 that states, “(h) (1) If a surface mining operation is not inspected by the lead agency on the date requested by the operator pursuant to Section 2207 and the operator has not received a 30-day notice of pending inspection from the lead agency as provided in subdivision (e), the operator may send a notice to the lead agency and the director stating the operator’s intent to have the surface mining operation inspected by a third party who has not been employed in any capacity by the operator in the previous 12 months and who is a state-licensed geologist, state-licensed civil engineer, state-licensed landscape architect, or state-licensed forester who is experienced in land reclamation. An inspector retained by the operator pursuant to this section shall provide the lead agency a 15-day notice of the inspector’s intended inspection date for the operation and shall provide a reasonable opportunity for a representative of the lead agency to attend the inspection.”
Remove the language from Section 2774 that states, “(5) Absent express authorization under this chapter, mine inspectors shall not inspect operations for the purpose of evaluating compliance with separate provisions of local, state, or federal law, including, but not limited to, the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code), the federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.), and the Fish and Game Code.”
Remove the language from Section 2774.1 that states, “(g) In exercising enforcement authority pursuant to this section, the lead agency, the director, or the board, as appropriate, shall take into account and seek to minimize the impact of any proposed enforcement action on the number of existing jobs supported directly or indirectly by the surface mining operation.”
Insert language provided by author’s office allowing the Board or DOC to apply to small claims court for unpaid administrative penalties.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
Allied Concrete & Supply Co., Inc.
Associated
Builders and Contractors of California
Associated General
Contractors
BoDean
Brown Sand,
Inc.
California Asphalt Pavement Association
California
Building Industry Association
California Business
Properties Association
California Chamber of
Commerce
California Construction and Industrial Materials
Association
California Independent Petroleum
Association
California Manufacturers and Technology
Association
California-Nevada Conference of Operating
Engineers
California State Council of
Laborers
CalPortland Company
CEMEX
Granite
Construction Company
Granite Rock Company
Knife
River Corporation
Livingston’s Concrete Service,
Inc.
National Federation of Independent Businesses
Puente
Ready Mix, Inc.
P.W. Gillibrand Co., Inc.
Robertson’s
Ready Mix
Rural County Representatives of California
Searles Valley Minerals
Stimpel-Wiebelhaus
Associates, Inc.
Superior Ready Mix Concrete
United
Contractors
Werner Corporation
Opposition
California League of Conservation
Voters
California Native Plant Society
Center
for Biological Diversity
Center for Environmental
Health
Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation
Clean
Water Action
Coalition for Clean Air
Environmental
Working Group
Environment California
Sierra
Club
Sierra Fund (unless amended)
Analysis Prepared by: Michael Jarred / NAT. RES. / (916) 319-2092
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):