AB 661: Counties: recording: real estate instruments.
- Session Year: 2015-2016
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2015-07-13
Existing law authorizes the board of supervisors to adopt, by resolution, a fee of up to $10 for each recording of a real estate instrument, paper, or notice required or permitted by law to be recorded, except as specified. Existing law defines the term real estate instrument to exclude a deed, instrument, or writing recorded in connection with a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax.
This bill would recast this latter exclusion from a real estate instrument as a statement that the above-described fee does not apply to any real estate instrument, paper, or notice accompanied by a declaration stating that the transfer is subject to a documentary transfer tax, is recorded concurrently with a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax, or is presented for recording within the same business day as, and is related to the recording of, a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax.
Existing law authorizes the board of supervisors to adopt, by resolution, a fee of up to $10 for each recording of a real estate instrument, paper, or notice required or permitted by law to be recorded, except as specified. Existing law defines the term real estate instrument to exclude a deed, instrument, or writing recorded in connection with a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax.
This bill would recast this latter exclusion from a real estate instrument as a statement that the above-described fee does not apply to any real estate instrument, paper, or notice accompanied by a declaration stating that the transfer is subject to a documentary transfer tax, is recorded concurrently with a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax, or is presented for recording within the same business day as, and is related to the recording of, a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax.
Existing law authorizes the board of supervisors to adopt, by resolution, a fee of up to $10 for each recording of a real estate instrument, paper, or notice required or permitted by law to be recorded, except as specified. Existing law defines the term real estate instrument to exclude a deed, instrument, or writing recorded in connection with a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax.
This bill would recast this latter exclusion from a real estate instrument as a statement that the above-described fee does not apply to any real estate instrument, paper, or notice related to and accompanied by a declaration stating that the transfer is subject to a documentary transfer tax, is recorded concurrently with a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax, or is presented for recording within the same business day as, and is related to the recording of, a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax.
Existing law authorizes the board of supervisors to adopt, by resolution, a fee of up to $10 for each recording of a real estate instrument, paper, or notice required or permitted by law to be recorded, except as specified. Existing law defines the term real estate instrument to exclude a deed, instrument, or writing recorded in connection with a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax.
This bill would recast this latter exclusion from a real estate instrument as a statement that the above-described fee does not apply to any real estate instrument, paper, or notice related to and recorded concurrently with a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax.
(a)(1)In addition to any other recording fees specified in this code, upon the adoption of a resolution by the county board of supervisors, a fee of up to ten dollars ($10) shall be paid at the time of recording of every real estate instrument, paper, or notice required or permitted by law to be recorded within that county, except those expressly exempted from payment of recording fees and except as provided in paragraph (2). For purposes of this section, real estate instrument means a deed of trust, an assignment of deed of trust, an amended deed of trust, an abstract of judgment, an affidavit, an assignment of rents, an assignment of a lease, a construction trust deed, covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs), a declaration of homestead, an easement, a lease, a lien, a lot line adjustment, a mechanics lien, a modification for deed of trust, a notice of completion, a quitclaim deed, a subordination agreement, a release, a reconveyance, a request for notice, a notice of default, a substitution of trustee, a notice of trustee sale, a trustees deed upon sale, or a notice of rescission of declaration of default, or any Uniform Commercial Code amendment, assignment, continuation, statement, or termination. The fees, after deduction of any actual and necessary administrative costs incurred by the county recorder in carrying out this section, shall be paid quarterly to the county auditor or director of finance, to be placed in the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund. The amount deducted for administrative costs shall not exceed 10 percent of the fees paid pursuant to this section.
(2)The fee imposed by paragraph (1) shall not apply to any real estate instrument, paper, or notice if any of the following apply:
(A)The real estate instrument, paper, or notice is accompanied by a declaration stating that the transfer is subject to a documentary transfer tax pursuant to Section 11911 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(B)The real estate instrument, paper, or notice is recorded concurrently with a document subject to a documentary transfer tax pursuant to Section 11911 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(C)The real estate instrument, paper, or notice is presented for recording within the same business day as, and is related to the recording of, a document subject to a documentary transfer tax pursuant to Section 11911 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. A real estate instrument, paper, or notice that is exempt under this subparagraph shall be accompanied by a statement that includes both of the following:
(i)A statement that the real estate instrument, paper, or notice is exempt from the fee imposed under paragraph (1).
(ii)A statement of the recording date and the recorder identification number or book and page of the previously recorded document.
(b)Money placed in the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund shall be expended to fund programs to enhance the capacity of local police and prosecutors to deter, investigate, and prosecute real estate fraud crimes. After deduction of the actual and necessary administrative costs referred to in subdivision (a), 60 percent of the funds shall be distributed to district attorneys subject to review pursuant to subdivision (d), and 40 percent of the funds shall be distributed to local law enforcement agencies within the county in accordance with subdivision (c). In those counties where the investigation of real estate fraud is done exclusively by the district attorney, after deduction of the actual and necessary administrative costs referred to in subdivision (a), 100 percent of the funds shall be distributed to the district attorney, subject to review pursuant to subdivision (d). A portion of the funds may be directly allocated to the county recorder to support county recorder fraud prevention programs, including, but not limited to, the fraud prevention program provided for in Section 27297.7. Prior to establishing or increasing fees pursuant to this section, the board of supervisors may consider support for county recorder fraud prevention programs. The funds so distributed shall be expended for the exclusive purpose of deterring, investigating, and prosecuting real estate fraud crimes.
(c)The county auditor or director of finance shall distribute funds in the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund to eligible law enforcement agencies within the county pursuant to subdivision (b), as determined by a Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund Committee composed of the district attorney, the county chief administrative officer, the chief officer responsible for consumer protection within the county, and the chief law enforcement officer of one law enforcement agency receiving funding from the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund, the latter being selected by a majority of the other three members of the committee. The chief law enforcement officer shall be a nonvoting member of the committee and shall serve a one-year term, which may be renewed. Members may appoint representatives of their offices to serve on the committee. If a county lacks a chief officer responsible for consumer protection, the county board of supervisors may appoint an appropriate representative to serve on the committee. The committee shall establish and publish deadlines and written procedures for local law enforcement agencies within the county to apply for the use of funds and shall review applications and make determinations by majority vote as to the award of funds using the following criteria:
(1)Each law enforcement agency that seeks funds shall submit a written application to the committee setting forth in detail the agencys proposed use of the funds.
(2)In order to qualify for receipt of funds, each law enforcement agency submitting an application shall provide written evidence that the agency either:
(A)Has a unit, division, or section devoted to the investigation or prosecution of real estate fraud, or both, and the unit, division, or section has been in existence for at least one year prior to the application date.
(B)Has on a regular basis, during the three years immediately preceding the application date, accepted for investigation or prosecution, or both, and assigned to specific persons employed by the agency, cases of suspected real estate fraud, and actively investigated and prosecuted those cases.
(3)The committees determination to award funds to a law enforcement agency shall be based on, but not be limited to, (A) the number of real estate fraud cases filed in the prior year; (B) the number of real estate fraud cases investigated in the prior year; (C) the number of victims involved in the cases filed; and (D) the total aggregated monetary loss suffered by victims, including individuals, associations, institutions, or corporations, as a result of the real estate fraud cases filed, and those under active investigation by that law enforcement agency.
(4)Each law enforcement agency that, pursuant to this section, has been awarded funds in the previous year, upon reapplication for funds to the committee in each successive year, in addition to any information the committee may require in paragraph (3), shall be required to submit a detailed accounting of funds received and expended in the prior year. The accounting shall include (A) the amount of funds received and expended; (B) the uses to which those funds were put, including payment of salaries and expenses, purchase of equipment and supplies, and other expenditures by type; (C) the number of filed complaints, investigations, arrests, and convictions that resulted from the expenditure of the funds; and (D) other relevant information the committee may reasonably require.
(d)The county board of supervisors shall annually review the effectiveness of the district attorney in deterring, investigating, and prosecuting real estate fraud crimes based upon information provided by the district attorney in an annual report. The district attorney shall submit the annual report to the board on or before September 1 of each year.
(e)A county shall not expend funds held in that countys Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund until the countys auditor-controller verifies that the countys district attorney has submitted an annual report for the countys most recent full fiscal year pursuant to the requirements of subdivision (d).
(f)The intent of the Legislature in enacting this section is to have an impact on real estate fraud involving the largest number of victims. To the extent possible, an emphasis should be placed on fraud against individuals whose residences are in danger of, or are in, foreclosure as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 1695.1 of the Civil Code. Case filing decisions continue to be at the discretion of the prosecutor.
(g)A district attorneys office or a local enforcement agency that has undertaken investigations and prosecutions that will continue into a subsequent program year may receive nonexpended funds from the previous fiscal year subsequent to the annual submission of information detailing the accounting of funds received and expended in the prior year.
(h)No money collected pursuant to this section shall be expended to offset a reduction in any other source of funds. Funds from the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund shall be used only in connection with criminal investigations or prosecutions involving recorded real estate documents.
(a)(1)In addition to any other recording fees specified in this code, upon the adoption of a resolution by the county board of supervisors, a fee of up to ten dollars ($10) shall be paid at the time of recording of every real estate instrument, paper, or notice required or permitted by law to be recorded within that county, except those expressly exempted from payment of recording fees and except as provided in paragraph (2). For purposes of this section, real estate instrument means a deed of trust, an assignment of deed of trust, an amended deed of trust, an abstract of judgment, an affidavit, an assignment of rents, an assignment of a lease, a construction trust deed, covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs), a declaration of homestead, an easement, a lease, a lien, a lot line adjustment, a mechanics lien, a modification for deed of trust, a notice of completion, a quitclaim deed, a subordination agreement, a release, a reconveyance, a request for notice, a notice of default, a substitution of trustee, a notice of trustee sale, a trustees deed upon sale, or a notice of rescission of declaration of default, or any Uniform Commercial Code amendment, assignment, continuation, statement, or termination. The fees, after deduction of any actual and necessary administrative costs incurred by the county recorder in carrying out this section, shall be paid quarterly to the county auditor or director of finance, to be placed in the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund. The amount deducted for administrative costs shall not exceed 10 percent of the fees paid pursuant to this section.
(2)The fee imposed by paragraph (1) shall not apply to any real estate instrument, paper, or notice if any of the following apply:
(A)The real estate instrument, paper, or notice is accompanied by a declaration stating that the transfer is subject to a documentary transfer tax pursuant to Section 11911 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(B)The real estate instrument, paper, or notice is recorded concurrently with a document subject to a documentary transfer tax pursuant to Section 11911 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(C)The real estate instrument, paper, or notice is presented for recording within the same business day as, and is related to the recording of, a document subject to a documentary transfer tax pursuant to Section 11911 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. A real estate instrument, paper, or notice that is exempt under this subparagraph shall be accompanied by a statement that includes both of the following:
(i)A statement that the real estate instrument, paper, or notice is exempt from the fee imposed under paragraph (1).
(ii)A statement of the recording date and the recorder identification number or book and page of the previously recorded document.
(b)Money placed in the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund shall be expended to fund programs to enhance the capacity of local police and prosecutors to deter, investigate, and prosecute real estate fraud crimes. After deduction of the actual and necessary administrative costs referred to in subdivision (a), 60 percent of the funds shall be distributed to district attorneys subject to review pursuant to subdivision (d), and 40 percent of the funds shall be distributed to local law enforcement agencies within the county in accordance with subdivision (c). In those counties where the investigation of real estate fraud is done exclusively by the district attorney, after deduction of the actual and necessary administrative costs referred to in subdivision (a), 100 percent of the funds shall be distributed to the district attorney, subject to review pursuant to subdivision (d). A portion of the funds may be directly allocated to the county recorder to support county recorder fraud prevention programs, including, but not limited to, the fraud prevention program provided for in Section 27297.7. Prior to establishing or increasing fees pursuant to this section, the board of supervisors may consider support for county recorder fraud prevention programs. The funds so distributed shall be expended for the exclusive purpose of deterring, investigating, and prosecuting real estate fraud crimes.
(c)The county auditor or director of finance shall distribute funds in the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund to eligible law enforcement agencies within the county pursuant to subdivision (b), as determined by a Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund Committee composed of the district attorney, the county chief administrative officer, the chief officer responsible for consumer protection within the county, and the chief law enforcement officer of one law enforcement agency receiving funding from the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund, the latter being selected by a majority of the other three members of the committee. The chief law enforcement officer shall be a nonvoting member of the committee and shall serve a one-year term, which may be renewed. Members may appoint representatives of their offices to serve on the committee. If a county lacks a chief officer responsible for consumer protection, the county board of supervisors may appoint an appropriate representative to serve on the committee. The committee shall establish and publish deadlines and written procedures for local law enforcement agencies within the county to apply for the use of funds and shall review applications and make determinations by majority vote as to the award of funds using the following criteria:
(1)Each law enforcement agency that seeks funds shall submit a written application to the committee setting forth in detail the agencys proposed use of the funds.
(2)In order to qualify for receipt of funds, each law enforcement agency submitting an application shall provide written evidence that the agency either:
(A)Has a unit, division, or section devoted to the investigation or prosecution of real estate fraud, or both, and the unit, division, or section has been in existence for at least one year prior to the application date.
(B)Has on a regular basis, during the three years immediately preceding the application date, accepted for investigation or prosecution, or both, and assigned to specific persons employed by the agency, cases of suspected real estate fraud, and actively investigated and prosecuted those cases.
(3)The committees determination to award funds to a law enforcement agency shall be based on, but not be limited to, (A) the number of real estate fraud cases filed in the prior year; (B) the number of real estate fraud cases investigated in the prior year; (C) the number of victims involved in the cases filed; and (D) the total aggregated monetary loss suffered by victims, including individuals, associations, institutions, or corporations, as a result of the real estate fraud cases filed, and those under active investigation by that law enforcement agency.
(4)Each law enforcement agency that, pursuant to this section, has been awarded funds in the previous year, upon reapplication for funds to the committee in each successive year, in addition to any information the committee may require in paragraph (3), shall be required to submit a detailed accounting of funds received and expended in the prior year. The accounting shall include (A) the amount of funds received and expended; (B) the uses to which those funds were put, including payment of salaries and expenses, purchase of equipment and supplies, and other expenditures by type; (C) the number of filed complaints, investigations, arrests, and convictions that resulted from the expenditure of the funds; and (D) other relevant information the committee may reasonably require.
(d)The county board of supervisors shall annually review the effectiveness of the district attorney in deterring, investigating, and prosecuting real estate fraud crimes based upon information provided by the district attorney in an annual report. The district attorney shall submit the annual report to the board on or before September 1 of each year.
(e)A county shall not expend funds held in that countys Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund until the countys auditor-controller verifies that the countys district attorney has submitted an annual report for the countys most recent full fiscal year pursuant to the requirements of subdivision (d).
(f)The intent of the Legislature in enacting this section is to have an impact on real estate fraud involving the largest number of victims. To the extent possible, an emphasis should be placed on fraud against individuals whose residences are in danger of, or are in, foreclosure as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 1695.1 of the Civil Code. Case filing decisions continue to be at the discretion of the prosecutor.
(g)A district attorneys office or a local enforcement agency that has undertaken investigations and prosecutions that will continue into a subsequent program year may receive nonexpended funds from the previous fiscal year subsequent to the annual submission of information detailing the accounting of funds received and expended in the prior year.
(h)No money collected pursuant to this section shall be expended to offset a reduction in any other source of funds. Funds from the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund shall be used only in connection with criminal investigations or prosecutions involving recorded real estate documents.
(a)(1)In addition to any other recording fees specified in this code, upon the adoption of a resolution by the county board of supervisors, a fee of up to ten dollars ($10) shall be paid at the time of recording of every real estate instrument, paper, or notice required or permitted by law to be recorded within that county, except those expressly exempted from payment of recording fees. A fee imposed pursuant to this subdivision shall not apply to any real estate instrument, paper, or notice related to, and recorded concurrently with, a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax pursuant to Section 11911 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. fees and except as provided in paragraph (2). For purposes of this section, real estate instrument means a deed of trust, an assignment of deed of trust, an amended deed of trust, an abstract of judgment, an affidavit, an assignment of rents, an assignment of a lease, a construction trust deed, covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs), a declaration of homestead, an easement, a lease, a lien, a lot line adjustment, a mechanics lien, a modification for deed of trust, a notice of completion, a quitclaim deed, a subordination agreement, a release, a reconveyance, a request for notice, a notice of default, a substitution of trustee, a notice of trustee sale, a trustees deed upon sale, or a notice of rescission of declaration of default, or any Uniform Commercial Code amendment, assignment, continuation, statement, or termination. The fees, after deduction of any actual and necessary administrative costs incurred by the county recorder in carrying out this section, shall be paid quarterly to the county auditor or director of finance, to be placed in the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund. The amount deducted for administrative costs shall not exceed 10 percent of the fees paid pursuant to this section.
(2)The fee imposed by paragraph (1) shall not apply to any real estate instrument, paper, or notice if any of the following apply:
(A)The real estate instrument, paper, or notice is accompanied by a declaration stating that the transfer is subject to a documentary transfer tax pursuant to Section 11911 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(B)The real estate instrument, paper, or notice is recorded concurrently with a document subject to a documentary transfer tax pursuant to Section 11911 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(C)The real estate instrument, paper, or notice is presented for recording within the same business day as, and is related to the recording of, a document subject to a documentary transfer tax pursuant to Section 11911 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. A real estate instrument, paper, or notice that is exempt under this subparagraph shall be accompanied by a statement that includes both of the following:
(i)A statement that the real estate instrument, paper, or notice is exempt from the fee imposed under paragraph (1).
(ii)A statement of the recording date and the recorder identification number or book and page of the previously recorded document.
(b)Money placed in the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund shall be expended to fund programs to enhance the capacity of local police and prosecutors to deter, investigate, and prosecute real estate fraud crimes. After deduction of the actual and necessary administrative costs referred to in subdivision (a), 60 percent of the funds shall be distributed to district attorneys subject to review pursuant to subdivision (d), and 40 percent of the funds shall be distributed to local law enforcement agencies within the county in accordance with subdivision (c). In those counties where the investigation of real estate fraud is done exclusively by the district attorney, after deduction of the actual and necessary administrative costs referred to in subdivision (a), 100 percent of the funds shall be distributed to the district attorney, subject to review pursuant to subdivision (d). A portion of the funds may be directly allocated to the county recorder to support county recorder fraud prevention programs, including, but not limited to, the fraud prevention program provided for in Section 27297.7. Prior to establishing or increasing fees pursuant to this section, the board of supervisors may consider support for county recorder fraud prevention programs. The funds so distributed shall be expended for the exclusive purpose of deterring, investigating, and prosecuting real estate fraud crimes.
(c)The county auditor or director of finance shall distribute funds in the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund to eligible law enforcement agencies within the county pursuant to subdivision (b), as determined by a Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund Committee composed of the district attorney, the county chief administrative officer, the chief officer responsible for consumer protection within the county, and the chief law enforcement officer of one law enforcement agency receiving funding from the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund, the latter being selected by a majority of the other three members of the committee. The chief law enforcement officer shall be a nonvoting member of the committee and shall serve a one-year term, which may be renewed. Members may appoint representatives of their offices to serve on the committee. If a county lacks a chief officer responsible for consumer protection, the county board of supervisors may appoint an appropriate representative to serve on the committee. The committee shall establish and publish deadlines and written procedures for local law enforcement agencies within the county to apply for the use of funds and shall review applications and make determinations by majority vote as to the award of funds using the following criteria:
(1)Each law enforcement agency that seeks funds shall submit a written application to the committee setting forth in detail the agencys proposed use of the funds.
(2)In order to qualify for receipt of funds, each law enforcement agency submitting an application shall provide written evidence that the agency either:
(A)Has a unit, division, or section devoted to the investigation or prosecution of real estate fraud, or both, and the unit, division, or section has been in existence for at least one year prior to the application date.
(B)Has on a regular basis, during the three years immediately preceding the application date, accepted for investigation or prosecution, or both, and assigned to specific persons employed by the agency, cases of suspected real estate fraud, and actively investigated and prosecuted those cases.
(3)The committees determination to award funds to a law enforcement agency shall be based on, but not be limited to, (A) the number of real estate fraud cases filed in the prior year; (B) the number of real estate fraud cases investigated in the prior year; (C) the number of victims involved in the cases filed; and (D) the total aggregated monetary loss suffered by victims, including individuals, associations, institutions, or corporations, as a result of the real estate fraud cases filed, and those under active investigation by that law enforcement agency.
(4)Each law enforcement agency that, pursuant to this section, has been awarded funds in the previous year, upon reapplication for funds to the committee in each successive year, in addition to any information the committee may require in paragraph (3), shall be required to submit a detailed accounting of funds received and expended in the prior year. The accounting shall include (A) the amount of funds received and expended; (B) the uses to which those funds were put, including payment of salaries and expenses, purchase of equipment and supplies, and other expenditures by type; (C) the number of filed complaints, investigations, arrests, and convictions that resulted from the expenditure of the funds; and (D) other relevant information the committee may reasonably require.
(d)The county board of supervisors shall annually review the effectiveness of the district attorney in deterring, investigating, and prosecuting real estate fraud crimes based upon information provided by the district attorney in an annual report. The district attorney shall submit the annual report to the board on or before September 1 of each year.
(e)A county shall not expend funds held in that countys Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund until the countys auditor-controller verifies that the countys district attorney has submitted an annual report for the countys most recent full fiscal year pursuant to the requirements of subdivision (d).
(f)The intent of the Legislature in enacting this section is to have an impact on real estate fraud involving the largest number of victims. To the extent possible, an emphasis should be placed on fraud against individuals whose residences are in danger of, or are in, foreclosure as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 1695.1 of the Civil Code. Case filing decisions continue to be at the discretion of the prosecutor.
(g)A district attorneys office or a local enforcement agency that has undertaken investigations and prosecutions that will continue into a subsequent program year may receive nonexpended funds from the previous fiscal year subsequent to the annual submission of information detailing the accounting of funds received and expended in the prior year.
(h)No money collected pursuant to this section shall be expended to offset a reduction in any other source of funds. Funds from the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund shall be used only in connection with criminal investigations or prosecutions involving recorded real estate documents.
(a)In addition to any other recording fees specified in this code, upon the adoption of a resolution by the county board of supervisors, a fee of up to ten dollars ($10) shall be paid at the time of recording of every real estate instrument, paper, or notice required or permitted by law to be recorded within that county, except those expressly exempted from payment of recording fees. A fee imposed pursuant to this subdivision shall not apply to any real estate instrument, paper, or notice related to, and recorded concurrently with, a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax pursuant to Section 11911 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. For purposes of this section, real estate instrument means a deed of trust, an assignment of deed of trust, an amended deed of trust, an abstract of judgment, an affidavit, an assignment of rents, an assignment of a lease, a construction trust deed, covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs), a declaration of homestead, an easement, a lease, a lien, a lot line adjustment, a mechanics lien, a modification for deed of trust, a notice of completion, a quitclaim deed, a subordination agreement, a release, a reconveyance, a request for notice, a notice of default, a substitution of trustee, a notice of trustee sale, a trustees deed upon sale, or a notice of rescission of declaration of default, or any Uniform Commercial Code amendment, assignment, continuation, statement, or termination. Real estate instrument does not include any deed, instrument, or writing recorded in connection with a transfer subject to the imposition of a documentary transfer tax as defined in Section 11911 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. The fees, after deduction of any actual and necessary administrative costs incurred by the county recorder in carrying out this section, shall be paid quarterly to the county auditor or director of finance, to be placed in the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund. The amount deducted for administrative costs shall not exceed 10 percent of the fees paid pursuant to this section.
(b)Money placed in the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund shall be expended to fund programs to enhance the capacity of local police and prosecutors to deter, investigate, and prosecute real estate fraud crimes. After deduction of the actual and necessary administrative costs referred to in subdivision (a), 60 percent of the funds shall be distributed to district attorneys subject to review pursuant to subdivision (d), and 40 percent of the funds shall be distributed to local law enforcement agencies within the county in accordance with subdivision (c). In those counties where the investigation of real estate fraud is done exclusively by the district attorney, after deduction of the actual and necessary administrative costs referred to in subdivision (a), 100 percent of the funds shall be distributed to the district attorney, subject to review pursuant to subdivision (d). A portion of the funds may be directly allocated to the county recorder to support county recorder fraud prevention programs, including, but not limited to, the fraud prevention program provided for in Section 27297.7. Prior to establishing or increasing fees pursuant to this section, the board of supervisors may consider support for county recorder fraud prevention programs. The funds so distributed shall be expended for the exclusive purpose of deterring, investigating, and prosecuting real estate fraud crimes.
(c)The county auditor or director of finance shall distribute funds in the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund to eligible law enforcement agencies within the county pursuant to subdivision (b), as determined by a Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund Committee composed of the district attorney, the county chief administrative officer, the chief officer responsible for consumer protection within the county, and the chief law enforcement officer of one law enforcement agency receiving funding from the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund, the latter being selected by a majority of the other three members of the committee. The chief law enforcement officer shall be a nonvoting member of the committee and shall serve a one-year term, which may be renewed. Members may appoint representatives of their offices to serve on the committee. If a county lacks a chief officer responsible for consumer protection, the county board of supervisors may appoint an appropriate representative to serve on the committee. The committee shall establish and publish deadlines and written procedures for local law enforcement agencies within the county to apply for the use of funds and shall review applications and make determinations by majority vote as to the award of funds using the following criteria:
(1)Each law enforcement agency that seeks funds shall submit a written application to the committee setting forth in detail the agencys proposed use of the funds.
(2)In order to qualify for receipt of funds, each law enforcement agency submitting an application shall provide written evidence that the agency either:
(A)Has a unit, division, or section devoted to the investigation or prosecution of real estate fraud, or both, and the unit, division, or section has been in existence for at least one year prior to the application date.
(B)Has on a regular basis, during the three years immediately preceding the application date, accepted for investigation or prosecution, or both, and assigned to specific persons employed by the agency, cases of suspected real estate fraud, and actively investigated and prosecuted those cases.
(3)The committees determination to award funds to a law enforcement agency shall be based on, but not be limited to, (A) the number of real estate fraud cases filed in the prior year; (B) the number of real estate fraud cases investigated in the prior year; (C) the number of victims involved in the cases filed; and (D) the total aggregated monetary loss suffered by victims, including individuals, associations, institutions, or corporations, as a result of the real estate fraud cases filed, and those under active investigation by that law enforcement agency.
(4)Each law enforcement agency that, pursuant to this section, has been awarded funds in the previous year, upon reapplication for funds to the committee in each successive year, in addition to any information the committee may require in paragraph (3), shall be required to submit a detailed accounting of funds received and expended in the prior year. The accounting shall include (A) the amount of funds received and expended; (B) the uses to which those funds were put, including payment of salaries and expenses, purchase of equipment and supplies, and other expenditures by type; (C) the number of filed complaints, investigations, arrests, and convictions that resulted from the expenditure of the funds; and (D) other relevant information the committee may reasonably require.
(d)The county board of supervisors shall annually review the effectiveness of the district attorney in deterring, investigating, and prosecuting real estate fraud crimes based upon information provided by the district attorney in an annual report. The district attorney shall submit the annual report to the board on or before September 1 of each year.
(e)A county shall not expend funds held in that countys Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund until the countys auditor-controller verifies that the countys district attorney has submitted an annual report for the countys most recent full fiscal year pursuant to the requirements of subdivision (d).
(f)The intent of the Legislature in enacting this section is to have an impact on real estate fraud involving the largest number of victims. To the extent possible, an emphasis should be placed on fraud against individuals whose residences are in danger of, or are in, foreclosure as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 1695.1 of the Civil Code. Case filing decisions continue to be at the discretion of the prosecutor.
(g)A district attorneys office or a local enforcement agency that has undertaken investigations and prosecutions that will continue into a subsequent program year may receive nonexpended funds from the previous fiscal year subsequent to the annual submission of information detailing the accounting of funds received and expended in the prior year.
(h)No money collected pursuant to this section shall be expended to offset a reduction in any other source of funds. Funds from the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund shall be used only in connection with criminal investigations or prosecutions involving recorded real estate documents.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2015 | From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 17). |
| Jul 13, 2015 | Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 76, Statutes of 2015. |
| Jul 13, 2015 | Approved by the Governor. |
| Jul 1, 2015 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2:30 p.m. |
| Jun 25, 2015 | Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0.). |
| Jun 25, 2015 | Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 2141.). |
| Jun 23, 2015 | In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77. |
| Jun 22, 2015 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 1548.). |
| Jun 22, 2015 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. |
| Jun 18, 2015 | Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar. |
| Feb 24, 2015 | Read first time. To print. |
| Jun 10, 2015 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F. |
| Jun 4, 2015 | Referred to Com. on GOV. & F. |
| May 22, 2015 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 1541.) |
| May 22, 2015 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. |
| May 22, 2015 | In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. |
| May 11, 2015 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| May 7, 2015 | From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (May 6). |
| Mar 9, 2015 | Referred to Com. on L. GOV. |
| Feb 25, 2015 | From printer. May be heard in committee March 27. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2015 | AB 661 MATHIS Concurrence in Senate Amendments | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Jun 22, 2015 | Consent Calendar 2nd AB661 Mathis | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Jun 17, 2015 | Do pass and be ordered to the Consent Calendar | Senate Standing Committee on Governance and Finance |
Passed |
|
| May 22, 2015 | AB 661 MATHIS Assembly Third Reading | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| May 6, 2015 | Do pass. | Assembly Standing Committee on Local Government |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| Alameda County District Attorney | ** Support | Jun 25, 2015 |
| Alpine County Assessor | ** Support | Jun 25, 2015 |
| Calaveras County Clerk-Recorder | ** Support | Jun 25, 2015 |
| Calaveras County Clerk-Recorder, Rebecca Turner | ** Support | May 6, 2015 |
| California District Attorneys Association | ** Support | Jun 25, 2015 |
| California Escrow Association | ** Support | Jun 25, 2015 |
| California Land Title Association | ** Support | Jun 25, 2015 |
| California State Association Of Counties | ** Support | Jun 25, 2015 |
| Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder and Registrar of Voters | ** Support | Jun 25, 2015 |
| Inyo County Clerk and Recorder | ** Support | Jun 25, 2015 |
| Inyo County Clerk and Recorder, Kammi Foote | ** Support | May 6, 2015 |
| Peter Aldana, Riverside County Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder | ** Support | Jun 25, 2015 |
| Recorder | ** Support | Jun 25, 2015 |
| Recorder, Donald O'Connor | ** Support | May 6, 2015 |
| Riverside County Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder, Peter Aldana | ** Support | May 6, 2015 |
| Rural County Representatives of California | ** Support | Jun 25, 2015 |
| San Bernardino County Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk | ** Support | Jun 25, 2015 |
| San Bernardino County Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk, Bob Dutton | ** Support | May 6, 2015 |
| San Francisco Office of the Assessor-Recorder | ** Support | Jun 25, 2015 |
| San Francisco Office of the Assessor-Recorder, Carmen Chu | ** Support | May 6, 2015 |
| Sonoma County Clerk-Recorder-Assessor | ** Support | Jun 25, 2015 |
| Sonoma County Clerk-Recorder-Assessor, William F. Rousseau | ** Support | May 6, 2015 |
AB 661
Page 4
CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
AB 661
(Mathis)
As Amended June 10, 2015
Majority vote
ASSEMBLY: |
75-0 |
(May 22, 2015) |
SENATE: |
37-0 |
(June 22, 2015) |
Original Committee Reference: L. GOV.
SUMMARY: Clarifies an exemption in current law from fees that counties can place on certain recorded real estate documents to fund real estate fraud prevention and enforcement.
The Senate amendments delete the Assembly version of this bill, and instead, clarify that the fee counties can place on recorded real estate documents to fund real estate fraud prevention and enforcement shall not apply to any real estate instrument, paper, or notice if any of the following apply:
The real estate instrument, paper, or notice is accompanied by a declaration stating that the transfer is subject to a documentary transfer tax, as specified;
The real estate instrument, paper, or notice is recorded concurrently with a document subject to a documentary transfer tax, as specified; or,
The real estate instrument, paper, or notice is presented for recording within the same business day as, and is related to the recording of, a document subject to a documentary transfer tax, as specified. A document that is exempt under this provision must be accompanied by a statement that includes both of the following:
A statement that the real estate instrument, paper, or notice is exempt from the fee imposed under existing law allowing counties to charge a fee on recorded real estate documents to fund real estate fraud prevention and enforcement; and,
A statement of the recording date and the recorder identification number or book and page of the previously recorded document.
EXISTING LAW:
Authorizes any county board of supervisors to adopt, by resolution, a fee of up to $10 for each recording of a real estate instrument, paper, or notice required or permitted by law to be recorded, except as specified, to be placed in a Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund (Fund).
Requires money in the Fund to be expended to support programs that enhance the capacity of local police and prosecutors to deter, investigate, and prosecute real estate fraud crimes.
Defines the term "real estate instrument" to mean a deed of trust, an assignment of deed of trust, an amended deed of trust, an abstract of judgment, an affidavit, an assignment of rents, an assignment of a lease, a construction trust deed, covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC and Rs), a declaration of homestead, an easement, a lease, a lien, a lot line adjustment, a mechanics lien, a modification for deed of trust, a notice of completion, a quitclaim deed, a subordination agreement, a release, a reconveyance, a request for notice, a notice of default, a substitution of trustee, a notice of trustee sale, a trustee’s deed upon sale, or a notice of rescission of declaration of default, or any Uniform Commercial Code amendment, assignment, continuation, statement, or termination.
Provides that "real estate instrument" does not include any deed, instrument, or writing recorded in connection with a transfer subject to the imposition of a documentary transfer tax, as defined in Revenue and Taxation Code Section 11911.
AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY, this bill:
Deleted language stating that, for the purposes of fees that counties can place on certain recorded real estate instruments to fund real estate fraud prevention and enforcement, "real estate instrument" does not include any deed, instrument, or writing recorded in connection with a transfer subject to the imposition of a documentary transfer tax, as specified.
Provided, instead, that the fee shall not apply to any real estate instrument, paper, or notice related to, and recorded concurrently with, a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax, as specified.
FISCAL EFFECT: None
COMMENTS:
Bill Summary. This bill clarifies an exemption in current law from fees that counties can place on certain recorded real estate documents to fund real estate fraud prevention and enforcement. This bill revises the definition of what is exempt by deleting language stating that "real estate instrument" does not include any deed, instrument, or writing recorded "in connection with" a transfer subject to the imposition of a documentary transfer tax, as specified. Instead, this bill provides that the real estate fraud prevention and enforcement fee allowed under current law shall not apply to any real estate instrument, paper, or notice if any of the following apply:
The real estate instrument, paper, or notice is accompanied by a declaration stating that the transfer is subject to a documentary transfer tax;
The real estate instrument, paper, or notice is recorded concurrently with a document subject to a documentary transfer tax; or,
The real estate instrument, paper, or notice is presented for recording within the same business day as, and is related to the recording of, a document subject to a documentary transfer tax. These documents must be accompanied by a statement that includes both of the following:
A statement that the real estate instrument, paper, or notice is exempt from the fee imposed under existing law allowing counties to charge a fee on recorded real estate documents to fund real estate fraud prevention and enforcement; and,
A statement of the recording date and the recorder identification number or book and page of the previously recorded document.
This bill is sponsored by the County Recorders Association of California.
Author's Statement. According to the author, "Clean-up language relating to SB 1342 [(Emmerson), Chapter 104, Statutes of 2012] is necessary to clarify the legislative intent of the phrase 'in connection with' pursuant to Government Code Section 27388, when determining if a fee for the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund is due on a recorded document.
"The indistinct phrase used in the code, 'in connection with' does not clearly define which documents should or should not have the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund fee, resulting in inconsistent application throughout California counties. Clearly defining which documents are exempt from payment of [the fee] will promote uniformity in the application of this [law] throughout the state."
Background. Under existing law, counties can impose a $10 recording fee on certain real estate documents for the purposes of deterring, investigating, and prosecuting real estate fraud crimes, with an emphasis on fraud against individuals whose residences are in danger of, or are in, foreclosure. Administrative costs are capped at 10% of revenues.
State law assigns 60% of the Fund proceeds to the county district attorney's office and 40% to eligible law enforcement agencies. In order to be eligible, a law enforcement agency must either have a unit or division devoted to real estate investigation or prosecution, or have been actively involved in such cases for the prior three years.
The law specifies which documents are subject to this fee, and provides an exemption from the fee for "any deed, instrument, or writing recorded in connection with a transfer subject to the imposition of a documentary transfer tax" (the sale of real property). This language was added by SB 1342. The sponsor contends that the phrase "in connection with" is unclear, such that county counsels are directing county recorders to impose the fee in different ways.
Previous Legislation. SB 1342, among other provisions, clarified an exemption from the fee for "any deed, instrument, or writing recorded in connection with a transfer subject to the imposition of a documentary transfer tax."
Arguments in Support. Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder and Registrar of Voters Joseph E. Canciamilla, in support, writes, "As it presently stands, some citizens may pay the fee when not legally required to do so while others may erroneously claim exemption simply because the current legal language is not clear. Clarification of the existing language will facilitate accurate advance calculation of recording fees, which is essential when purchasing or refinancing a home since all fees must be paid at the time a document is submitted for recording. Incorrect fees can result not only in delays but possibly financial implications to potential homeowners.
"Assembly Bill 661 will clarify the current language and enable uniform application of the fee throughout 58 counties. Moreover, accurately calculated fees will reduce delays in recording documents related to homeownership."
Arguments in Opposition. None on file.
Analysis Prepared by: Angela Mapp / L. GOV. / (916) 319-3958 FN: 0001062
AB 661
Page 3
|
Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 |
CONSENT
Bill No: AB 661
Amended: 6/10/15 in Senate
SENATE GOVERNANCE & FIN. COMMITTEE: 7-0, 6/17/15
AYES: Hertzberg, Nguyen, Beall, Hernandez, Lara, Moorlach, Pavley
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 75-0, 5/22/15 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Counties: recording: real estate instruments
DIGEST: This bill clarifies an exemption in current law from fees that counties can place on certain recorded real estate documents to fund real estate fraud prevention and enforcement.
Existing law:
Allows counties to impose an additional recording fee on certain real estate documents and put the money into a county Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund (SB 532, Hughes, 1995).
Permits county officials to use money from its Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund to deter, investigate, and prosecute real estate fraud crimes, with an emphasis on fraud against individuals whose residences are in danger of, or are in, foreclosure.
Authorizes counties to impose a tax at a specified rate on deeds and other recorded instruments transferring real property.
Defines “real estate instruments,” for purposes of documentary transfer taxes (DTT), to include: deeds of trust, assignments of rents, covenants, conditions, and restrictions, easements, and mechanics liens, among other documents.
Exempts from DTT common recorded instruments that do not actually convey an interest real property on their own, such as gifts, name changes, and instruments establishing the separate property of a spouse.
This bill:
Deletes language stating that, for the purposes of fees that counties can place on certain recorded real estate instruments to fund real estate fraud prevention and enforcement, “real estate instrument” does not include any deed, instrument, or writing recorded “in connection with” a transfer subject to the imposition of a documentary transfer tax, as specified.
Provides that the real estate fraud prevention and enforcement fees permitted under current law must not apply to any real estate instrument, paper, or notice accompanied by a declaration stating that the transfer is:
Subject to a documentary transfer tax;
Recorded concurrently with a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax; or
Presented for recording within the same business day as, and is related to the recording of, a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax.
Comments
Purpose of the bill. State law allows counties to impose an additional $10 recording fee on certain real estate documents to fund county efforts to deter, investigate, and prosecute real estate fraud. However, because the state law is ambiguous with respect to what types of documents are exempted from this fee, some citizens are paying the fee when not legally required to do so; others are erroneously claiming their real estate documents are exempt. Incorrect fees can result not only in delays, but can also have financial implications for potential homeowners. By clarifying which documents are exempt from the fee and which are not, AB 661 facilitates accurate calculation of recording fees in advance of home purchases and refinances, since all fees must be paid at the time a document is submitted for recording.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No Local: No
Alameda County District Attorney
Alpine County Assessor/Recorder
Calaveras County Clerk-Recorder
California District Attorneys Association
California Escrow Association
California Land Title Association
California State Association of Counties
Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder and Registrar of Voters
County Recorders' Association of California
Inyo County Clerk and Recorder
Peter Aldana, Riverside County Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder
Rural County Representatives of California
San Bernardino County Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk
San Francisco Office of the Assessor-Recorder
Sonoma County Clerk-Recorder-Assessor
OPPOSITION: (Verified 6/18/15)
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 75-0, 5/22/15
AYES: Achadjian, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins
NO VOTE RECORDED: Alejo, O'Donnell, Olsen, Waldron, Weber
Prepared by: Toren Lewis / GOV. & F. / (916) 651-4119
6/18/15 15:09:53
**** END ****
AB 661 (Mathis) 6/10/15 Page 3 of 3
SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNANCE AND FINANCE
Senator Robert M. Hertzberg, Chair
2015 - 2016 Regular
Bill No: |
AB 661 |
Hearing Date: |
6/17/15 |
Author: |
Mathis |
Tax Levy: |
No |
Version: |
6/10/15 |
Fiscal: |
No |
Consultant: |
Lewis |
||
Counties: recording: real estate instruments
Clarifies an exemption in current law from fees that counties can place on certain recorded real estate documents to fund real estate fraud prevention and enforcement.
Background and Existing Law
State law allows counties to impose an additional recording fee on certain real estate documents and put the money into a county Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund (SB 532, Hughes, 1995). County officials can use the Fund to deter, investigate, and prosecute real estate fraud crimes, with an emphasis on fraud against individuals whose residences are in danger of, or are in, foreclosure. In 2012, the Legislature increased the fee counties are permitted to charge for this purpose from $3 to $10, and created an exemption to the fee for "any deed, instrument, or writing recorded in connection with a transfer subject to the imposition of a documentary transfer tax.” In other words, the exemption applies to documents related to the sale of real property (SB 1342, Emerson, 2012).
The Documentary Transfer Tax Act authorizes counties to impose a tax at a specified rate on deeds and other recorded instruments transferring real property. For purposes of documentary transfer taxes (DTT), the definition of “real estate instruments” is broad, and includes: deeds of trust, assignments of rents, covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs), easements, and mechanics liens, among other documents. By comparison, many common recorded instruments that do not actually convey an interest real property on their own—such as gifts, name changes, and instruments establishing the separate property of a spouse—are exempt from DTT.
County recorders contend that existing law is unclear as to when and how a particular document is recorded “in connection with a transfer subject to the imposition of [DTT]” for purposes of real estate fraud prevention and enforcement fees, and point out that county attorneys are directing them to impose real estate fraud fees in inconsistent ways across the state.
County recorders therefore suggest changing state law to instead exempt real estate documents from the fee if the documents are accompanied by a declaration that the instrument is subject to a documentary transfer tax, recorded concurrently with a document that is subject to a transfer tax, or presented for recording the same day and related to a property transfer that is subject to transfer tax.
Proposed Law
Assembly Bill 661 deletes language stating that, for the purposes of fees that counties can place on certain recorded real estate instruments to fund real estate fraud prevention and enforcement, “real estate instrument” does not include any deed, instrument, or writing recorded “in connection with” a transfer subject to the imposition of a documentary transfer tax, as specified.
AB 661 instead provides that the real estate fraud prevention and enforcement fees permitted under current law must not apply to any real estate instrument, paper, or notice accompanied by a declaration stating that the transfer is:
Subject to a documentary transfer tax;
Recorded concurrently with a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax; or
Presented for recording within the same business day as, and is related to the recording of, a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax.
State Revenue Impact
No estimate.
Comment
1. Purpose of the bill. State law allows counties to impose an additional $10 recording fee on certain real estate documents to fund county efforts to deter, investigate, and prosecute real estate fraud. However, because the state law is ambiguous with respect to what types of documents are exempted from this fee, some citizens are paying the fee when not legally required to do so; others are erroneously claiming their real estate documents are exempt. Incorrect fees can result not only in delays, but can also have financial implications for potential homeowners. By clarifying which documents are exempt from the fee and which are not, AB 661 would facilitate accurate calculation of recording fees in advance of home purchases and refinances, since all fees must be paid at the time a document is submitted for recording.
Assembly Actions
Assembly Local Government 8-0
Assembly Floor 75-0
Support and Opposition
(6/11/15)
Support: County Recorders' Association of California; Alameda County District Attorney; Alpine County Assessor/Recorder; Calaveras County Clerk-Recorder; California District Attorneys Association; California Escrow Association; California Land Title Association; California State Association of Counties; Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder and Registrar of Voters; Inyo County Clerk and Recorder; Riverside County Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder, Peter Aldana; Rural County Representatives of California; San Bernardino County Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk; San Francisco Office of the Assessor-Recorder; Sonoma County Clerk-Recorder-Assessor.
Opposition: Unknown.
-- END --
AB 661
Page 3
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
AB 661
(Mathis)
As Introduced February 24, 2015
Majority vote
Committee |
Votes |
Ayes |
Noes |
Local Government |
8-0 |
Maienschein, Alejo, Chiu, Cooley, Gordon, Holden, Linder, Waldron |
|
SUMMARY: Clarifies an exemption in current law from fees that counties can place on certain recorded real estate documents to fund real estate fraud prevention and enforcement. Specifically, this bill:
Deletes language stating that, for the purposes of fees that counties can place on certain recorded real estate instruments to fund real estate fraud prevention and enforcement, "real estate instrument" does not include any deed, instrument, or writing recorded in connection with a transfer subject to the imposition of a documentary transfer tax, as specified.
Provides, instead, that the fee shall not apply to any real estate instrument, paper, or notice related to, and recorded concurrently with, a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax, as specified.
EXISTING LAW:
Authorizes any county board of supervisors to adopt, by resolution, a fee of up to $10 for each recording of a real estate instrument, paper, or notice required or permitted by law to be recorded, except as specified, to be placed in a Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund (Fund).
Requires money in the Fund to be expended to support programs that enhance the capacity of local police and prosecutors to deter, investigate, and prosecute real estate fraud crimes.
Defines the term "real estate instrument" to mean a deed of trust, an assignment of deed of trust, an amended deed of trust, an abstract of judgment, an affidavit, an assignment of rents, an assignment of a lease, a construction trust deed, covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC and Rs), a declaration of homestead, an easement, a lease, a lien, a lot line adjustment, a mechanics lien, a modification for deed of trust, a notice of completion, a quitclaim deed, a subordination agreement, a release, a reconveyance, a request for notice, a notice of default, a substitution of trustee, a notice of trustee sale, a trustee’s deed upon sale, or a notice of rescission of declaration of default, or any Uniform Commercial Code amendment, assignment, continuation, statement, or termination.
Provides that "real estate instrument" does not include any deed, instrument, or writing recorded in connection with a transfer subject to the imposition of a documentary transfer tax, as defined in Revenue and Taxation Code Section 11911.
FISCAL EFFECT: None
COMMENTS:
Bill Summary. This bill clarifies an exemption in current law from fees that counties can place on certain recorded real estate documents to fund real estate fraud prevention and enforcement. The bill revises the definition of what is exempt by stating that the fee shall not apply to any real estate instrument, paper, or notice related to, and recorded concurrently with, a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax. This bill is sponsored by the County Recorders Association of California.
Author's Statement. According to the author, "Clean-up language relating to SB 1342 [(Emmerson), Chapter 104, Statutes of 2012] is necessary to clarify the legislative intent of the phrase 'in connection with' pursuant to Government Code Section 27388, when determining if a fee for the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund is due on a recorded document.
"The indistinct phrase used in the code, 'in connection with' does not clearly define which documents should or should not have the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund fee, resulting in inconsistent application throughout California counties. Clearly defining which documents are exempt from payment of [the fee] will promote uniformity in the application of this [law] throughout the state."
Background. Under existing law, counties can impose a $10 recording fee on certain real estate documents for the purposes of deterring, investigating, and prosecuting real estate fraud crimes, with an emphasis on fraud against individuals whose residences are in danger of, or are in, foreclosure. Administrative costs are capped at 10% of revenues.
State law assigns 60% of the Fund proceeds to the county district attorney's office and 40% to eligible law enforcement agencies. In order to be eligible, a law enforcement agency must either have a unit or division devoted to real estate investigation or prosecution, or have been actively involved in such cases for the prior three years.
The law specifies which documents are subject to this fee, and provides an exemption from the fee for "any deed, instrument, or writing recorded in connection with a transfer subject to the imposition of a documentary transfer tax" (the sale of real property). This language was added by SB 1342 .
The sponsor contends that the phrase "in connection with" is unclear, such that county counsels are directing county recorders to impose the fee in different ways. The sponsor is proposing the language in this bill, "related to, and recorded concurrently with," as a more specific alternative.
Previous Legislation. SB 1342 , among other provisions, clarified an exemption from the fee for "any deed, instrument, or writing recorded in connection with a transfer subject to the imposition of a documentary transfer tax."
Arguments in Support. Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder and Registrar of Voters Joseph E. Canciamilla, in support, writes, "As it presently stands, some citizens may pay the fee when not legally required to do so while others may erroneously claim exemption simply because the current legal language is not clear. Clarification of the existing language will facilitate accurate advance calculation of recording fees, which is essential when purchasing or refinancing a home since all fees must be paid at the time a document is submitted for recording. Incorrect fees can result not only in delays but possibly financial implications to potential homeowners.
"Assembly Bill 661 will clarify the current language and enable uniform application of the fee throughout 58 counties. Moreover, accurately calculated fees will reduce delays in recording documents related to homeownership."
Arguments in Opposition. None on file.
Analysis Prepared by: Angela Mapp / L. GOV. / (916) 319-3958 FN: 0000342
AB 661
Page 3
Date of Hearing: May 6, 2015
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Brian Maienschein, Chair
AB 661
(Mathis) – As Introduced February 24, 2015
SUBJECT: Counties: recording: real estate instruments.
SUMMARY: Clarifies an exemption in current law from fees that counties can place on certain recorded real estate documents to fund real estate fraud prevention and enforcement. Specifically, this bill:
Deletes language stating that, for the purposes of fees that counties can place on certain recorded real estate instruments to fund real estate fraud prevention and enforcement, “real estate instrument” does not include any deed, instrument, or writing recorded in connection with a transfer subject to the imposition of a documentary transfer tax, as specified.
Provides, instead, that the fee shall not apply to any real estate instrument, paper, or notice related to, and recorded concurrently with, a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax, as specified.
EXISTING LAW:
Authorizes any county board of supervisors to adopt, by resolution, a fee of up to $10 for each recording of a real estate instrument, paper, or notice required or permitted by law to be recorded, except as specified, to be placed in a Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund (Fund).
Requires money in the Fund to be expended to support programs that enhance the capacity of local police and prosecutors to deter, investigate, and prosecute real estate fraud crimes.
Defines the term “real estate instrument” to mean a deed of trust, an assignment of deed of trust, an amended deed of trust, an abstract of judgment, an affidavit, an assignment of rents, an assignment of a lease, a construction trust deed, covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs), a declaration of homestead, an easement, a lease, a lien, a lot line adjustment, a mechanics lien, a modification for deed of trust, a notice of completion, a quitclaim deed, a subordination agreement, a release, a reconveyance, a request for notice, a notice of default,
a substitution of trustee, a notice of trustee sale, a trustee’s deed upon sale, or a notice of rescission of declaration of default, or any Uniform Commercial Code amendment, assignment, continuation, statement, or termination.
Provides that “real estate instrument” does not include any deed, instrument, or writing recorded in connection with a transfer subject to the imposition of a documentary transfer tax, as defined in Section 11911 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
FISCAL EFFECT: None
COMMENTS:
Bill Summary. This bill clarifies an exemption in current law from fees that counties can place on certain recorded real estate documents to fund real estate fraud prevention and enforcement. The bill revises the definition of what is exempt by stating that the fee shall not apply to any real estate instrument, paper, or notice related to, and recorded concurrently with, a transfer subject to a documentary transfer tax. This bill is sponsored by the County Recorders Association of California.
Author's Statement. According to the author, "Clean-up language relating to SB 1342 (2012) is necessary to clarify the legislative intent of the phrase 'in connection with' pursuant to Government Code section 27388, when determining if a fee for the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund is due on a recorded document.
"The indistinct phrase used in the code, 'in connection with' does not clearly define which documents should or should not have the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund fee, resulting in inconsistent application throughout California counties. Clearly defining which documents are exempt from payment of (the fee) will promote uniformity in the application of this (law) throughout the state."
Background. Under existing law, counties can impose a $10 recording fee on certain real estate documents for the purposes of deterring, investigating, and prosecuting real estate fraud crimes, with an emphasis on fraud against individuals whose residences are in danger of, or are in, foreclosure. Administrative costs are capped at 10% of revenues.
State law assigns 60% of the Fund proceeds to the county district attorney’s office and 40% to eligible law enforcement agencies. In order to be eligible, a law enforcement agency must either have a unit or division devoted to real estate investigation or prosecution, or have been actively involved in such cases for the prior three years.
The law specifies which documents are subject to this fee, and provides an exemption to the fee for "any deed, instrument, or writing recorded in connection with a transfer subject to the imposition of a documentary transfer tax" (the sale of real property). This language was added by SB 1342 (Emmerson), Chapter 104, Statutes of 2012.
The sponsor contends that the phrase "in connection with" is unclear, such that county counsels are directing county recorders to impose the fee in different ways. The sponsor is proposing the language in this bill, "related to, and recorded concurrently with," as a more specific alternative.
Previous Legislation. SB 1342 (Emmerson), Chapter 104, Statutes of 2012, among other provisions, clarified an exemption to the fee for "any deed, instrument, or writing recorded in connection with a transfer subject to the imposition of a documentary transfer tax."
Arguments in Support. Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder and Registrar of Voters Joseph E. Canciamilla, in support, writes, "As it presently stands, some citizens may pay the fee when not legally required to do so while others may erroneously claim exemption simply because the current legal language is not clear. Clarification of the existing language will facilitate accurate advance calculation of recording fees, which is essential when purchasing or refinancing a home since all fees must be paid at the time a document is submitted for recording. Incorrect fees can result not only in delays but possibly financial implications to potential homeowners.
"Assembly Bill 661 will clarify the current language and enable uniform application of the fee throughout 58 counties. Moreover, accurately calculated fees will reduce delays in recording documents related to homeownership."
Arguments in Opposition. None on file.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
County Recorders' Association of California [SPONSOR]
Alameda County District Attorney, Nancy E. O'Malley
Alpine County Assessor/Recorder, Donald O'Connor
Calaveras County Clerk-Recorder, Rebecca Turner
California District Attorneys Association
California Escrow Association
California Land Title Association
California State Association of Counties
Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder and Registrar of Voters, Joseph E. Canciamilla
Inyo County Clerk and Recorder, Kammi Foote
Riverside County Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder, Peter Aldana
Rural County Representatives of California
San Bernardino County Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk, Bob Dutton
San Francisco Office of the Assessor-Recorder, Carmen Chu
Sonoma County Clerk-Recorder-Assessor, William F. Rousseau
Opposition
None on file
Analysis Prepared by: Angela Mapp / L. GOV. / (916) 319-3958
Discussed in Hearing
Assembly Floor
Assembly Floor
Assembly Standing Committee on Local Government
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):