SB 138: Hospitals: seismic safety.
- Session Year: 2015-2016
- House: Senate
- Latest Version Date: 2015-08-19
Existing law, the Alfred E. Alquist Hospital Facilities Seismic Safety Act of 1983, establishes, under the jurisdiction of the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, a program of seismic safety building standards for certain hospitals constructed on and after March 7, 1973.
Existing law provides that, after January 1, 2008, a general acute care hospital building that is determined to be a potential risk of collapse or to pose significant loss of life in the event of seismic activity be used only for nonacute care hospital purposes, except that the office may grant a 5-year extension under prescribed circumstances. Existing law also authorizes the office to grant an additional 2-year extension in specified circumstances.
This bill would authorize a critical access hospital located in the City of Tehachapi to resubmit to the office its application for an extension to January 1, 2020, as specified.
Existing law requires a pupil to attend the courses of physical education for a total period of time of not less than 400 minutes each 10 schooldays unless the pupil is excused or exempted from that requirement.
This bill would authorize the governing board of a school district to exempt a 4-year or senior high school pupil from attending courses of physical education if the pupil is engaged in high school rodeo after regular school hours. The bill would also make a conforming change, correct cross-references, and make nonsubstantive changes.
Existing law requires a pupil to attend the courses of physical education for a total period of time of not less than 400 minutes each 10 schooldays unless the pupil is excused or exempted from that requirement.
This bill would authorize the governing board of a school district to exempt a 4-year or senior high school pupil from attending courses of physical education if the pupil is engaged in high school rodeo after regular school hours. The bill would also make a conforming change, correct cross-references, and make nonsubstantive changes.
Existing law requires a pupil to attend the courses of physical education for a total period of time of not less than 400 minutes each 10 schooldays unless the pupil is excused or exempted from that requirement.
This bill would authorize the governing board of a school district to exempt a 4-year or senior high school pupil from attending courses of physical education if the pupil is engaged in high school rodeo after regular school hours. The bill would also make a conforming change, correct cross-references, and make nonsubstantive changes.
(a)(1)After January 1, 2008, any general acute care hospital building that is determined to be a potential risk of collapse or pose significant loss of life shall only be used for nonacute care hospital purposes, unless an extension of this deadline has been granted and either of the following occurs before the end of the extension:
(A)A replacement building has been constructed and a certificate of occupancy has been granted by the office for the replacement building.
(B)A retrofit has been performed on the building and a construction final has been obtained by the office.
(2)An extension of the deadline may be granted by the office upon a demonstration by the owner that compliance will result in a loss of health care capacity that may not be provided by other general acute care hospitals within a reasonable proximity. In its request for an extension of the deadline, a hospital shall state why the hospital is unable to comply with the January 1, 2008, deadline requirement.
(3)Prior to granting an extension of the January 1, 2008, deadline pursuant to this section, the office shall do all of the following:
(A)Provide public notice of a hospitals request for an extension of the deadline. The notice, at a minimum, shall be posted on the offices Internet Web site, and shall include the facilitys name and identification number, the status of the request, and the beginning and ending dates of the comment period, and shall advise the public of the opportunity to submit public comments pursuant to subparagraph (C). The office shall also provide notice of all requests for the deadline extension directly to interested parties upon request of the interested parties.
(B)Provide copies of extension requests to interested parties within 10 working days to allow interested parties to review and provide comment within the 45-day comment period. The copies shall include those records that are available to the public pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(C)Allow the public to submit written comments on the extension proposal for a period of not less than 45 days from the date of the public notice.
(b)(1)It is the intent of the Legislature, in enacting this subdivision, to facilitate the process of having more hospital buildings in substantial compliance with this chapter and to take nonconforming general acute care hospital inpatient buildings out of service more quickly.
(2)The functional contiguous grouping of hospital buildings of a general acute care hospital, each of which provides, as the primary source, one or more of the hospitals eight basic services as specified in subdivision (a) of Section 1250, may receive a five-year extension of the January 1, 2008, deadline specified in subdivision (a) of this section pursuant to this subdivision for both structural and nonstructural requirements. A functional contiguous grouping refers to buildings containing one or more basic hospital services that are either attached or connected in a way that is acceptable to the State Department of Health Care Services. These buildings may be either on the existing site or a new site.
(3)To receive the five-year extension, a single building containing all of the basic services or at least one building within the contiguous grouping of hospital buildings shall have obtained a building permit prior to 1973 and this building shall be evaluated and classified as a nonconforming, Structural Performance Category-1 (SPC-1) building. The classification shall be submitted to and accepted by the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. The identified hospital building shall be exempt from the requirement in subdivision (a) until January 1, 2013, if the hospital agrees that the basic service or services that were provided in that building shall be provided, on or before January 1, 2013, as follows:
(A)Moved into an existing conforming Structural Performance Category-3 (SPC-3), Structural Performance Category-4 (SPC-4), or Structural Performance Category-5 (SPC-5) and Non-Structural Performance Category-4 (NPC-4) or Non-Structural Performance Category-5 (NPC-5) building.
(B)Relocated to a newly built compliant SPC-5 and NPC-4 or NPC-5 building.
(C)Continued in the building if the building is retrofitted to a SPC-5 and NPC-4 or NPC-5 building.
(4)A five-year extension is also provided to a post-1973 building if the hospital owner informs the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development that the building is classified as SPC-1, SPC-3, or SPC-4 and will be closed to general acute care inpatient service use by January 1, 2013. The basic services in the building shall be relocated into a SPC-5 and NPC-4 or NPC-5 building by January 1, 2013.
(5)SPC-1 buildings, other than the building identified in paragraph (3) or (4), in the contiguous grouping of hospital buildings shall also be exempt from the requirement in subdivision (a) until January 1, 2013. However, on or before January 1, 2013, at a minimum, each of these buildings shall be retrofitted to a SPC-2 and NPC-3 building, or no longer be used for general acute care hospital inpatient services.
(c)On or before March 1, 2001, the office shall establish a schedule of interim work progress deadlines that hospitals shall be required to meet to be eligible for the extension specified in subdivision (b). To receive this extension, the hospital building or buildings shall meet the year 2002 nonstructural requirements.
(d)A hospital building that is eligible for an extension pursuant to this section shall meet the January 1, 2030, nonstructural and structural deadline requirements if the building is to be used for general acute care inpatient services after January 1, 2030.
(e)Upon compliance with subdivision (b), the hospital shall be issued a written notice of compliance by the office. The office shall send a written notice of violation to hospital owners that fail to comply with this section. The office shall make copies of these notices available on its Internet Web site.
(f)(1)A hospital that has received an extension of the January 1, 2008, deadline pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) may request an additional extension of up to two years for a hospital building that it owns or operates and that meets the criteria specified in paragraph (2), (3), or (5).
(2)The office may grant the additional extension if the hospital building subject to the extension meets all of the following criteria:
(A)The hospital building is under construction at the time of the request for extension under this subdivision and the purpose of the construction is to meet the requirements of subdivision (a) to allow the use of the building as a general acute care hospital building after the extension deadline granted by the office pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b).
(B)The hospital building plans were submitted to the office and were deemed ready for review by the office at least four years prior to the applicable deadline for the building. The hospital shall indicate, upon submission of its plans, the SPC-1 building or buildings that will be retrofitted or replaced to meet the requirements of this section as a result of the project.
(C)The hospital received a building permit for the construction described in subparagraph (A) at least two years prior to the applicable deadline for the building.
(D)The hospital submitted a construction timeline at least two years prior to the applicable deadline for the building demonstrating the hospitals intent to meet the applicable deadline. The timeline shall include all of the following:
(i)The projected construction start date.
(ii)The projected construction completion date.
(iii)Identification of the contractor.
(E)The hospital is making reasonable progress toward meeting the timeline set forth in subparagraph (D), but factors beyond the hospitals control make it impossible for the hospital to meet the deadline.
(3)The office may grant the additional extension if the hospital building subject to the extension meets all of the following criteria:
(A)The hospital building is owned by a health care district that has, as owner, received the extension of the January 1, 2008, deadline, but where the hospital is operated by an unaffiliated third-party lessee pursuant to a facility lease that extends at least through December 31, 2009. The district shall file a declaration with the office with a request for an extension stating that, as of the date of the filing, the district has lacked, and continues to lack, unrestricted access to the subject hospital building for seismic planning purposes during the term of the lease, and that the district is under contract with the county to maintain hospital services when the hospital comes under district control. The office shall not grant the extension if an unaffiliated third-party lessee will operate the hospital beyond December 31, 2010.
(B)The hospital building plans were submitted to the office and were deemed ready for review by the office at least four years prior to the applicable deadline for the building. The hospital shall indicate, upon submission of its plans, the SPC-1 building or buildings that will be retrofitted or replaced to meet the requirements of this section as a result of the project.
(C)The hospital received a building permit for the construction described in subparagraph (B) by December 31, 2011.
(D)The hospital submitted, by December 31, 2011, a construction timeline for the building demonstrating the hospitals intent and ability to meet the deadline of December 31, 2014. The timeline shall include all of the following:
(i)The projected construction start date.
(ii)The projected construction completion date.
(iii)Identification of the contractor.
(E)The hospital building is under construction at the time of the request for the extension, the purpose of the construction is to meet the requirements of subdivision (a) to allow the use of the building as a general acute care hospital building after the extension deadline granted by the office pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b), and the hospital is making reasonable progress toward meeting the timeline set forth in subparagraph (D).
(F)The hospital granted an extension pursuant to this paragraph shall submit an additional status report to the office, equivalent to that required by subdivision (c) of Section 130061, no later than June 30, 2013.
(4)An extension granted pursuant to paragraph (3) shall be applicable only to the health care district applicant and its affiliated hospital while the hospital is operated by the district or an entity under the control of the district.
(5)The office may grant the additional extension if the hospital building subject to the extension meets all of the following criteria:
(A)The hospital owner submitted to the office, prior to June 30, 2009, a request for review using current computer modeling utilized by the office and based upon software developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), referred to as Hazards US, and the building was deemed SPC-1 after that review.
(B)The hospital building plans for the building are submitted to the office and deemed ready for review by the office prior to July 1, 2010. The hospital shall indicate, upon submission of its plans, the SPC-1 building or buildings that shall be retrofitted or replaced to meet the requirements of this section as a result of the project.
(C)The hospital receives a building permit from the office for the construction described in subparagraph (B) prior to January 1, 2012.
(D)The hospital submits, prior to January 1, 2012, a construction timeline for the building demonstrating the hospitals intent and ability to meet the applicable deadline. The timeline shall include all of the following:
(i)The projected construction start date.
(ii)The projected construction completion date.
(iii)Identification of the contractor.
(E)The hospital building is under construction at the time of the request for the extension, the purpose of the construction is to meet the requirements of subdivision (a) to allow the use of the building as a general acute care hospital building after the extension deadline granted by the office pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b), and the hospital is making reasonable progress toward meeting the timeline set forth in subparagraph (D).
(F)The hospital owner completes construction such that the hospital meets all criteria to enable the office to issue a certificate of occupancy by the applicable deadline for the building.
(6)A hospital located in the County of Sacramento, San Mateo, or Santa Barbara or the City of San Jose or the City of Willits that has received an additional extension pursuant to paragraph (2) or (5) may request an additional extension until September 1, 2015, to obtain either a certificate of occupancy from the office for a replacement building, or a construction final from the office for a building on which a retrofit has been performed.
(7)A hospital denied an extension pursuant to this subdivision may appeal the denial to the Hospital Building Safety Board.
(8)The office may revoke an extension granted pursuant to this subdivision for any hospital building where the work of construction is abandoned or suspended for a period of at least one year, unless the hospital demonstrates in a public document that the abandonment or suspension was caused by factors beyond its control.
(g)(1)Notwithstanding subdivisions (a), (b), (c), and (f), and Sections 130061.5 and 130064, a hospital that has received an extension of the January 1, 2008, deadline pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) also may request an additional extension of up to seven years for a hospital building that it owns or operates. The office may grant the extension subject to the hospital meeting the milestones set forth in paragraph (2).
(2)The hospital building subject to the extension shall meet all of the following milestones, unless the hospital building is reclassified as SPC-2 or higher as a result of its Hazards US score:
(A)The hospital owner submits to the office, no later than September 30, 2012, a letter of intent stating whether it intends to rebuild, replace, or retrofit the building, or remove all general acute care beds and services from the building, and the amount of time necessary to complete the construction.
(B)The hospital owner submits to the office, no later than September 30, 2012, a schedule detailing why the requested extension is necessary, and specifically how the hospital intends to meet the requested deadline.
(C)The hospital owner submits to the office, no later than September 30, 2012, an application ready for review seeking structural reassessment of each of its SPC-1 buildings using current computer modeling based upon software developed by FEMA, referred to as Hazards US.
(D)The hospital owner submits to the office, no later than January 1, 2015, plans ready for review consistent with the letter of intent submitted pursuant to subparagraph (A) and the schedule submitted pursuant to subparagraph (B).
(E)The hospital owner submits a financial report to the office at the time the plans are submitted pursuant to subparagraph (D). The report shall demonstrate the hospital owners financial capacity to implement the construction plans submitted pursuant to subparagraph (D).
(F)The hospital owner receives a building permit consistent with the letter of intent submitted pursuant to subparagraph (A) and the schedule submitted pursuant to subparagraph (B), no later than July 1, 2018.
(3)To evaluate public safety and determine whether to grant an extension of the deadline, the office shall consider the structural integrity of the hospitals SPC-1 buildings based on its Hazards US scores, community access to essential hospital services, and the hospital owners financial capacity to meet the deadline as determined by either a bond rating of BBB or below or the financial report on the hospital owners financial capacity submitted pursuant to subparagraph (E) of paragraph (2). The criteria contained in this paragraph shall be considered by the office in its determination of the length of an extension or whether an extension should be granted.
(4)The extension or subsequent adjustments granted pursuant to this subdivision may not exceed the amount of time that is reasonably necessary to complete the construction specified in paragraph (2).
(5)If the circumstances underlying the request for extension submitted to the office pursuant to paragraph (2) change, the hospital owner shall notify the office as soon as practicable, but in no event later than six months after the hospital owner discovered the change of circumstances. The office may adjust the length of the extension granted pursuant to paragraphs (2) and (3) as necessary, but in no event longer than the period specified in paragraph (1).
(6)A hospital denied an extension pursuant to this subdivision may appeal the denial to the Hospital Building Safety Board.
(7)The office may revoke an extension granted pursuant to this subdivision for any hospital building when it is determined that any information submitted pursuant to this section was falsified, or if the hospital failed to meet a milestone set forth in paragraph (2), or where the work of construction is abandoned or suspended for a period of at least six months, unless the hospital demonstrates in a publicly available document that the abandonment or suspension was caused by factors beyond its control.
(8)Regulatory submissions made by the office to the California Building Standards Commission to implement this section shall be deemed to be emergency regulations and shall be adopted as emergency regulations.
(9)The hospital owner that applies for an extension pursuant to this subdivision shall pay the office an additional fee, to be determined by the office, sufficient to cover the additional reasonable costs incurred by the office for maintaining the additional reporting requirements established under this section, including, but not limited to, the costs of reviewing and verifying the extension documentation submitted pursuant to this subdivision. This additional fee shall not include any cost for review of the plans or other duties related to receiving a building or occupancy permit.
(10)This subdivision shall become operative on the date that the State Department of Health Care Services receives all necessary federal approvals for a 201112 fiscal year hospital quality assurance fee program that includes three hundred twenty million dollars ($320,000,000) in fee revenue to pay for health care coverage for children, which is made available as a result of the legislative enactment of a 201112 fiscal year hospital quality assurance fee program.
(h)Notwithstanding any other law, a critical access hospital located in the City of Tehachapi may resubmit its seismic safety extension application to the office for a Hazards US assessment to achieve SPC-2 status, if the applications original January 1, 2020, deadline to reach SPC-2 status is not extended. The resubmitted application shall include a timetable to achieve the January 1, 2020, deadline that is acceptable to the office.
SECTION 1.Section 51222 of the Education Code is amended to read:51222.(a)All pupils, except pupils excused or exempted pursuant to Section 51241, 51242, 51246, or 51247, shall be required to attend courses of physical education for a total period of time of not less than 400 minutes each 10 schooldays. A pupil may be excused from physical education classes during one of grades 10 to 12, inclusive, for not to exceed 24 hours in order to participate in automobile driver training. A pupil who is excused from physical education classes to enroll in automobile driver training shall attend a minimum of 7,000 minutes of physical education instruction during the school year.
(b)The governing board of a school district that maintains a high school and that elects to exempt pupils from required attendance in physical education courses pursuant to paragraph (1) or (2) or both of subdivision (b) of Section 51241 shall offer those exempted pupils a variety of elective physical education courses of not less than 400 minutes each 10 schooldays.
SEC. 2.Section 51247 is added to the Education Code, to read:51247.The governing board of a school district may exempt a four-year or senior high school pupil from attending courses of physical education if the pupil is engaged in high school rodeo carried on wholly or partially after regular school hours.
(a)All pupils, except pupils excused or exempted pursuant to Section 51241, 51242, 51246, or 51247, shall be required to attend courses of physical education for a total period of time of not less than 400 minutes each 10 schooldays. A pupil may be excused from physical education classes during one of grades 10, 11, or 12 10 to 12, inclusive, for not to exceed 24 hours in order to participate in automobile driver training. A pupil who is excused from physical education classes to enroll in automobile driver training shall attend a minimum of 7,000 minutes of physical education instruction during the school year.
(b)The governing board of a school district that maintains a high school and that elects to exempt pupils from required attendance in physical education courses pursuant to paragraph (1) or (2) or both of subdivision (b) of Section 51241 shall offer those exempted pupils a variety of elective physical education courses of not less than 400 minutes each 10 schooldays.
SEC. 2.Section 51247 is added to the Education Code, to read:51247.The governing board of a school district may exempt a four-year or senior high school pupil from attending courses of physical education if the pupil is engaged in high school rodeo carried on wholly or partially after regular school hours.
(a)All pupils, except pupils excused or exempted pursuant to Section 51241, 51242, 51246, or 51247, shall be required to attend upon the courses of physical education for a total period of time of not less than 400 minutes each 10 schooldays. Any A pupil may be excused from physical education classes during one of grades 10, 11, or 12 for not to exceed 24 clock hours in order to participate in automobile driver training. Such A pupil who is excused from physical education classes to enroll in automobile driver training shall attend upon a minimum of 7,000 minutes of physical education instruction during such the school year.
(b)The governing board of each a school district that maintains a high school and that elects to exempt pupils from required attendance in physical education courses pursuant to paragraph (1) or (2) or both of subdivision (b) of Section 51241 shall offer those exempted pupils so exempted a variety of elective physical education courses of not less than 400 minutes each 10 schooldays.
SEC. 2.Section 51247 is added to the Education Code, to read:51247.The governing board of a school district may exempt a four-year or senior high school pupil from attending courses of physical education if the pupil is engaged in high school rodeo carried on wholly or partially after regular school hours.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2015 | Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print. |
| Jan 27, 2015 | From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 26. |
| Feb 5, 2015 | Referred to Com. on ED. |
| Mar 13, 2015 | Set for hearing March 25. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED. |
| Mar 25, 2015 | From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 417.) (March 25). |
| Mar 26, 2015 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Apr 6, 2015 | In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk. |
| Apr 6, 2015 | Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 483.) Ordered to the Assembly. |
| May 14, 2015 | Referred to Com. on ED. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | June 17 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author. |
| Jul 1, 2015 | July 1 set for second hearing. Failed passage in committee. Reconsideration granted. |
| Aug 19, 2015 | From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED. |
| Aug 24, 2015 | Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2015 | Reconsideration. | Assembly Standing Committee on Education |
Passed |
|
| Jul 1, 2015 | Do pass. | Assembly Standing Committee on Education |
Failed |
|
| Apr 6, 2015 | Senate 3rd Reading SB138 Fuller | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Mar 25, 2015 | Do pass | Senate Standing Committee on Education |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| American Heart American Stroke Association | * Against | Jul 1, 2015 |
| American Heart Association | ** Against | Jul 1, 2015 |
| American Stroke Association | ** Against | Jul 1, 2015 |
| California Association for Health Physical Education, Recreation and Dance | * Against | Jul 1, 2015 |
| California Circuit Finals Rodeo | ** Support | Jul 1, 2015 |
| California High School Rodeo Association | ** Support | Jul 1, 2015 |
| California Horse Council | ** Support | Jul 1, 2015 |
| California Teachers Association | * Against | Jul 1, 2015 |
| Campo | * Support | Jul 1, 2015 |
| Clements | * Support | Jul 1, 2015 |
| Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District | * Against | Mar 25, 2015 |
| Guinda | * Support | Jul 1, 2015 |
| High School Rodeo | * Support | Jul 1, 2015 |
| Lodi | * Support | Jul 1, 2015 |
| Los Angeles County Of | * Against | Jul 1, 2015 |
| Middletown | * Support | Jul 1, 2015 |
| National High School Rodeo Association | ** Support | Apr 6, 2015 |
| Oakdale High School | ** Support | Jul 1, 2015 |
| One individual | ** Against | Apr 6, 2015 |
| Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association | ** Support | Jul 1, 2015 |
| Recreation and Dance | ** Against | Mar 25, 2015 |
| Rodeo Club Advisor, Oakdale High School | ** Support | Apr 6, 2015 |
| Salina | * Support | Jul 1, 2015 |
| San Jose State University | * Against | Jul 1, 2015 |
| SHAPE America | ** Against | Jul 1, 2015 |
| u California Association for Health, Physical Education, | ** Against | Mar 25, 2015 |
SB 138
Page 6
Date of Hearing: July 1, 2015
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
Patrick O'Donnell, Chair
SB 138
(Fuller) – As Amended March 18, 2015
SENATE VOTE: 36-0
SUBJECT: Physical education: exemption: high school rodeo.
SUMMARY: Authorizes the governing board of a school district to exempt a four-year or senior high school pupil from attending courses of physical education if the pupil is engaged in high school rodeo carried on wholly or partially after regular school hours.
EXISTING LAW:
Requires, as a condition of graduation, pupils in grades 9 to 12 to complete two courses in physical education, unless otherwise exempted. (Education code section 51225.3)
Authorizes the governing board of a school district to exempt any four-year or senior high school pupil from attending courses of physical education, if the pupil is engaged in a regular school-sponsored interscholastic athletic program carried on wholly or partially after regular school hours. (Education code section 51242)
Requires pupils, except those exempted, to attend courses of physical education for not less than 400 minutes each 10 schooldays. Authorizes any pupil to be excused from physical education classes during one of grades 10, 11, or 12 for 24 hours in order to participate in automobile driver training, but specifies that pupil shall attend a minimum of 7,000 minutes of physical education instruction during such school year. (Education code section 51222)
Authorizes the governing board of a school district or the office of the county superintendent of schools to grant a temporary exemption to a pupil from courses in physical education, if the pupil is ill or injured and a modified program to meet the needs of the pupil cannot be provided; or, if the pupil is enrolled for one-half, or less, of the work normally required of full-time pupils. (Education code section 51241)
Authorizes the governing board of a school district or the office of the county superintendent of schools, with the consent of a pupil, to grant a pupil an exemption from courses in physical education for two years any time during grades 10 to 12, inclusive, if the pupil has met satisfactorily at least five of the six standards of the physical performance test administered in grade 9, 10, 11 or 12. (Education code section 51241)
Requires physical education to be offered to all pupils, and, therefore, schools are required to provide adequate facilities and instructional resources for that instruction. (Education code section 51241)
Authorizes the governing board of a school district or the office of the county superintendent to grant permanent exemption from courses in physical education if the pupil complies with any one of the following:
Is 16 years of age or older and has been enrolled in the grade 10 for one academic year or longer.
Is enrolled as a postgraduate pupil.
Is enrolled in a juvenile home, ranch, camp, or forestry camp school where pupils are scheduled for recreation and exercise pursuant to the requirements of Section 4346 of Title 15 of the California Code of Regulations. (Education code section 51241)
FISCAL EFFECT: This bill is keyed non-fiscal.
COMMENTS: Existing law requires high school students to complete two courses in physical education (PE) as a state graduation requirement. Existing law also authorizes school governing boards to exempt students from this requirement in specific instances. This bill seeks to expand the ways that students can be exempted from PE by authorizing school governing boards to exempt students from PE for participating in private rodeo associations that are not school sponsored. The committee should consider whether the existing two course physical education requirement for high school graduation is important for all students and whether students should be exempted from PE for participation in private athletic organizations away from school.
According to the author, many schools choose to interpret section 51242 to exempt pupils who play “traditional sports” (i.e. football, soccer, volleyball, etc.) from required PE classes. Often times California High School Rodeo Association (CHSRA) athletes are not included in this exemption. SB 138 would simply make it clear that school boards may include high school rodeo athletes in the list of potentially exempted PE pupils, if that is a policy the school board chooses to implement.
What are school districts currently doing? There is not a definitive source of information regarding what school districts are currently doing with regard to granting students exemptions for the physical education graduation requirement. Anecdotal evidence suggests that some districts are granting PE exemptions to students participating in school sponsored athletics when that course is taught by a PE teacher; or, when that course is taught by a PE teacher through independent study. Anecdotal evidence also suggests that districts are exempting students from PE courses for their participation in other school sponsored interscholastic athletic activities that are not governed by CIF. It appears that some schools have created school sponsored Rodeo teams and are granting such exemptions under existing law. With that in mind, it is unclear why this bill is necessary.
Is this bill necessary? Current law authorizes schools to exempt from physical education courses students who participate in a “regular school-sponsored interscholastic athletic program.” Education Code § 35179 defines “interscholastic athletics” as policies, programs and activities that are formulated or executed in conjunction with, or in contemplation of, athletic contests between two or more schools, either public or private. The California Interscholastic Federation’s (CIF) website lists rodeo as a “non-CIF sport.” Standards, criteria, or guidance do not exist regarding which sports may qualify for an exemption. School districts have great discretion in determining which athletic programs qualify for an exemption.
Slippery slope? Does authorizing participation in a private rodeo association to qualify as an exemption from physical education set a precedent for adding other non-school sponsored sports? If participation in a private rodeo association qualifies for a PE exemption, should participation in private ballet lessons at a studio also qualify for such an exemption? The committee should consider whether participation in other private athletic groups should qualify a student for such an exemption from PE, or whether PE is important for all students and exemptions should be narrowly crafted and limited to school sponsored sports.
What are Interscholastic Athletic Programs? According to the CIF, the following sports qualify as interscholastic athletic programs: basketball, cross country, football, golf, track and field, volleyball, wrestling, soccer, tennis, badminton, baseball, field hockey, gymnastics, lacrosse, skiing, snowboarding, softball, swimming and diving, and water polo.
Rodeo is not currently an interscholastic athletic program governed by the bylaws of the CIF. Therefore, the coaches and instructors for these programs are currently not required to complete the mandatory coaches training or fingerprinting requirements in existing state law. Anecdotal evidence suggests that schools can create a locally governed school-sponsored rodeo team and if they do so in the same manner as other interscholastic athletic teams, may exempt pupils from PE for participating in the rodeo team under the school sponsored interscholastic athletic program exemption.
Training for Interscholastic Athletic Coaches. Interscholastic athletic coaches are required to complete a mandatory training program under existing state law either offered by the school district or the CIF. Interscholastic athletic coaches are required to participate in the California High School Coaching Education and Training Program and the Legislature has expressed its intent that the program emphasize the following components:
Development of coaching philosophies consistent with the goals of the school, school district, and school district governing board.
Sport psychology.
Sport pedagogy.
Sport physiology including principles of training and the harmful effects associated with the use of steroids.
Sport management.
Training certification in CPR and first aid, including concussion training.
Knowledge of and adherence to statewide rules and regulations, as well as school regulations including, but not necessarily limited to, eligibility, gender equity, and discrimination.
Sound planning and goal setting. (EC 35179.1)
Currently CIF offers training programs to high school coaches who receive a certificate upon course completion (typically a six to eight hour class). To date more than 117,000 coaches have taken the training, which costs approximately $50 per person. Some school districts pay for the program while others require the coach to pay for it. The completed certificate is transferable between school districts.
It is unclear if rodeo coaches are uniformly hired by school districts like other coaches. If coaches for these programs are not hired by the district, they may not be required to demonstrate their qualifications or be subject to the requirements listed above. The committee should consider what qualifications these coaches should have if students will be given an exemption from PE coursework requirements in exchange for their participation in these programs.
Liability
Concerns: If school districts begin to grant exemptions from
PE courses for participation in private rodeo associations, will
school districts be accepting the liability of student injury during
those activities? For instance, if a student takes riding lessons at
a barn 10 miles from school, and earns an exemption from PE for that
activity, will the district be liable when a student is thrown from a
horse during that activity? Likewise, if a student rides their horse
at their house after school unsupervised, should that qualify for an
exemption from PE, and would the district be open to liability if the
student is hurt since they are being exempt from PE for that
activity?
Existing Exemptions. Current law authorizes school governing boards to exempt students from the required 400 minutes of physical education every 10 days, if they engage in regular school-sponsored interscholastic athletic programs. Both the 400 minute PE requirement and the exemption for athletic programs were added to the Education code on April 30, 1977. While other specific exemptions to the PE requirements have been added since 1977, none have specifically exempted a student from taking PE if they are participating in other ongoing physical activities away from school. Why is it important to exempt students from PE for participating in rodeo, especially when exemptions like this have not been added to the Education code in nearly 38 years?
Physical Education vs. Physical Activity. Is physical education the same as physical activity? Is physical activity the goal of physical education? According to the National Association for Sport and Physical Education, the unique goals of physical education are the development of physical competence (movement skills), health-related fitness, cognitive understanding (of the principles of physical activity), and a positive attitude toward physical activity. Physical activity is generally considered to be a broad term used to describe all forms of large muscle movements including sports, dance, games, work, lifestyle activities, and exercise for fitness. The committee should consider whether the goal of physical education is physical activity, or if the goal of physical education is broader.
Why is Physical Education important? According to a letter authored by Superintendent O’Connell and State Board President Johnson included in the Physical Education Model Content Standards, “Physical education significantly contributes to students’ well-being; therefore, it is an instructional priority for California schools and an integral part of our students’ educational experience. High-quality physical education instruction contributes to good health, develops fundamental and advanced motor skills, improves students’ self-confidence, and provides opportunities for increased levels of physical fitness that are associated with high academic achievement. The Physical Education Model Content Standards for California Public Schools, Kindergarten Through Grade Twelve affirms the standing of physical education; rigor is essential to achievement, and participation is not the same as education.”
Arguments in Support. Oakdale High School supports the bill and states, "Oakdale High School has been recognizing Rodeo as a sport since 1994. It is my understanding that a great deal of time and research went into the implementation of establishing a rodeo team at Oakdale High. First, it is important to note that all student members of CHSRA are covered with medical insurance provided when annual membership dues are paid. Students are covered at sanctioned events through the State and National liability clauses at no cost to the school district. That seems to be one of the biggest concerns of a school district that may be considering recognizing rodeo as a school sport.
Oakdale High School has been effectively providing its rodeo athletes with the same scholastic privileges that other athletes get. For example, rodeo is considered a spring sport allowing students to earn up to five credits of PE per year. Students may also earn the block letter after completing one year of rodeo. There are general team qualification guidelines that must be met in order for students to earn the credit and letter. Students must remain in good academic standing and compete at 80 percent of the sanctioned rodeos for the year."
Arguments in Opposition. The California Teachers Association (CTA) opposes the bill and states, "Rodeo is a supplementary extracurricular physical activity beyond the core standards-based physical education curriculum. Legislating exemptions from physical education for any specific physical activity, such as rodeo sets a significant precedent contributing to the erosion of the current state mandates for physical education and the comprehensive health of California's 6.2 million K-12 students. For the optimum health of our students, CTA opposes exempting high school students who participate in the extracurricular activity of rodeo from a school district's physical education curriculum standards and state mandates for physical education."
Committee Amendments: The committee should consider amending the bill to simply clarify existing law by deleting the contents of this bill and stating: "A pupil may be exempted from physical education pursuant to Section 51242, for participation in a locally developed school sponsored interscholastic athletic program, that is not administered by the California Interscholastic Federation, if that school sponsored interscholastic athletic program is in compliance with laws pertaining to athletic programs, including, but not limited to, coaches training and fingerprinting requirements for activity supervisors, pursuant to Sections 35179.1, 35179.7, 49020-49024, and 49032."
Related legislation: AB 351 (Salas) from 2009, which was re-referred and held in the Assembly Education Committee, would have authorized, as an urgency measure, the governing board of a school district that provides the following courses or programs to exempt any pupil participating in such a course or program from attending courses of physical education (PE) and from the physical education high school graduation requirement:
California Cadet Corps.
Cheer team or Dance Team.
Color guard or Drill Team.
Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps.
Marching band.
AB 533 (Hayashi) from 2009, which was held in the Assembly Appropriations Committee, would have added new requirements to the California High School Coaching Education and Training Program for training on recognizing and managing the signs and symptoms of potentially catastrophic injuries; emergency action planning; communicating effectively with 911 emergency services; and, required high school sports coaches to complete a coaching education program by December 31, 2010.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
California Circuit Finals Rodeo
California High School Rodeo Association
California Horse Council
Oakdale High School
Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association
Two Individuals
Opposition
American Heart Association
American Stroke Association
California Association for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance
California Teachers Association
SHAPE America
Numerous Individuals
Analysis Prepared by: Chelsea Kelley / ED. / (916) 319-2087
SB 138
Page 4
|
Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 |
THIRD READING
Bill No: SB 138
Amended: 3/18/15
SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE: 6-0, 3/25/15
AYES: Huff, Block, Hancock, Leyva, Mendoza, Vidak
NO VOTE RECORDED: Pan, Liu
SUBJECT: Physical education: exemption: high school rodeo
DIGEST: This bill authorizes school districts to exempt high school students from physical education courses if the student is engaged in high school rodeo.
Existing law:
Requires students to complete two courses in physical education as a condition of graduation, unless otherwise exempted. (Education Code § 51225.3)
Requires students in grades 7-12, except those exempted, to attend courses of physical education for not less than 400 minutes each 10 schooldays.
(EC § 51222)
Authorizes school districts and county offices of education to grant exemptions, as follows:
A temporary exemption may be granted to a student who is either:
Ill or injured and a modified program to meet the needs of the student cannot be provided.
The student is enrolled for one-half, or less, of the work normally required of full-time students. (EC § 51241)
A two-year exemption anytime during grades 10-12, if the student has satisfactorily met at least five of the six standards of the physical performance test. (EC § 51241)
A permanent exemption if the student complies with any of the following:
Is 16 years of age or older and has been enrolled in the grade 10 for one academic year or longer.
Is enrolled as a postgraduate student.
Is enrolled in a juvenile home, ranch, camp, or forestry camp school where students are scheduled for recreation and exercise.
(EC § 51241)
A student who is engaged in a regular school-sponsored interscholastic athletic program carried on wholly or partially after regular school hours. (EC § 51242)
Requires the California Department of Education (CDE) to exercise general supervision over the courses of physical education in schools, advise schools in the development and improvement of their physical education and activity programs, and investigate the work in physical education in public schools. The CDE is required to ensure that the data collected through the categorical program monitoring indicates the extent to which schools, among other things:
Provides instruction in physical education for a total period of time of not less than 400 minutes each 10 schooldays to students in grades 7-12.
Conducts physical fitness testing.
Provides a course of study in physical education to high school students that includes a developmentally appropriate sequence of instruction, including the effects of physical activity upon dynamic health, the mechanics of body movement, aquatics, gymnastics and tumbling, individual and dual sports, rhythms and dance, team sports, and combatives. (EC § 33352)
This
bill authorizes school districts to exempt high school students from
physical education courses if the student is engaged in high school
rodeo. Specifically, this bill:
Authorizes the governing board of a school district to exempt a four-year or senior high school student from attending physical education courses if the student is engaged in high school rodeo, wholly or partially after regular school hours.
Makes technical changes by including cross-references of other existing exemptions in provisions that require non-exempted students to attend physical education courses for at least 400 minutes each 10 schooldays.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No Local: No
California Circuit Finals Rodeo
California High School Rodeo Association
California Horse Council
National High School Rodeo Association
Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association
Rodeo Club Advisor, Oakdale High School
OPPOSITION: (Verified 3/25/15)
American Heart Association
California Association for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance
One individual
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: According to the author, many schools choose to interpret the authority in current law to exempt from physical education only those students who play traditional sports. Often times, the California High School Rodeo Association athletes are not included in this exemption.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: According to the California Association for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, this activity does not provide comprehensive standards-based physical education and should not be allowed to fulfill the requirement for physical education. This program (rodeo) has distinctly different goals and objectives than physical education and is based on a participatory model rather than an educational model.
Prepared by: Lynn Lorber / ED. / (916) 651-4105
4/2/15 14:59:27
**** END ****
SB 138 (Fuller) Page 4 of 4
SENATE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
Senator Carol Liu, Chair
2015 - 2016 Regular
Bill No: SB 138
Author: |
Fuller |
||
Version: |
March 18, 2015 Hearing Date: March 25, 2015 |
||
Urgency: |
No |
Fiscal: |
No |
Consultant: |
Lynn Lorber |
||
Subject: Physical education: exemption: high school rodeo
SUMMARY
This bill authorizes school districts to exempt high school students from physical education courses if the student is engaged in high school rodeo.
BACKGROUND
Current law:
Requires students to complete two courses in physical education as a condition of graduation, unless otherwise exempted. (Education Code § 51225.3)
Requires students in grades 7-12, except those exempted, to attend courses of physical education for not less than 400 minutes each 10 schooldays.
(EC § 51222)
Authorizes school districts and county offices of education to grant exemptions, as follows:
A temporary exemption may be granted to a student who is either:
Ill or injured and a modified program to meet the needs of the student cannot be provided.
The student is enrolled for one-half, or less, of the work normally required of full-time students. (EC § 51241)
A two-year exemption anytime during grades 10-12, if the student has satisfactorily met at least five of the six standards of the physical performance test. (EC § 51241)
A permanent exemption if the student complies with any of the following:
Is 16 years of age or older and has been enrolled in the grade 10 for one academic year or longer.
Is enrolled as a postgraduate student.
Is enrolled in a juvenile home, ranch, camp, or forestry camp school where students are scheduled for recreation and exercise.
(EC § 51241)
A student who is engaged in a regular school-sponsored interscholastic athletic program carried on wholly or partially after regular school hours. (EC § 51242)
Requires the California Department of Education (CDE) to exercise general supervision over the courses of physical education in schools, advise schools in the development and improvement of their physical education and activity programs, and investigate the work in physical education in public schools. The CDE is required to ensure that the data collected through the categorical program monitoring indicates the extent to which schools, among other things:
Provides instruction in physical education for a total period of time of not less than 400 minutes each 10 schooldays to students in grades 7-12.
Conducts physical fitness testing.
Provides a course of study in physical education to high school students that includes a developmentally appropriate sequence of instruction, including the effects of physical activity upon dynamic health, the mechanics of body movement, aquatics, gymnastics and tumbling, individual and dual sports, rhythms and dance, team sports, and combatives. (EC § 33352)
ANALYSIS
This bill authorizes school districts to exempt high school students from physical education courses if the student is engaged in high school rodeo. Specifically, this bill:
Authorizes the governing board of a school district to exempt a four-year or senior high school student from attending physical education courses if the student is engaged in high school rodeo, wholly or partially after regular school hours.
Makes technical changes by including cross-references of other existing exemptions in provisions that require non-exempted students to attend physical education courses for at least 400 minutes each 10 schooldays.
STAFF COMMENTS
Need for the bill. According to the author, many schools choose to interpret the authority in current law to exempt from physical education only those students who play traditional sports. “Often times, the California High School Rodeo Association athletes are not included in this exemption.”
Is this bill necessary? No. Current law authorizes schools to exempt from physical education courses students who participate in a “regular school-sponsored interscholastic athletic program.” Education Code § 35179 defines “interscholastic athletics” as policies, programs and activities that are formulated or executed in conjunction with, or in contemplation of, athletic contests between two or more schools, either public or private. The California Interscholastic Federation’s (CIF) website lists rodeo as a “non-CIF sport.”
Standards, criteria, or guidance do not exist regarding which sports may qualify for an exemption. School districts have great discretion in determining which athletic programs qualify for an exemption.
Does the definition of “interscholastic athletics” imply that only CIF sports may be recognized for an exemption, while non-CIF sports do not?
Do CIF sports provide more physical education (in addition to physical activity) than non-CIF sports such as rodeo?
Slippery slope? Does specifically authorizing participation in rodeo, and only rodeo, to qualify as an exemption from physical education set a precedent for adding one sport or activity at a time? Why not specify all of these sports and physical activities, such as marching band, ROTC, and cheerleading, that may qualify for exemption?
The author and this Committee may wish to consider addressing the larger policy issues:
Which sports and physical activities should warrant an exemption from physical education courses?
Should exemptions for participation in sports and physical activities meet standards for physical education courses, similar to the current requirement for granting physical education credit? California Code of Regulations § 10060 requires school districts to appraise the quality of a high school physical education program based upon whether or not the course of study provides for instruction in each of the following areas: effects of physical activity upon dynamic health, mechanics of body movement, aquatics, gymnastics and tumbling, individual and dual sports, rhythms and dance, team sports, and combatives.
Related and prior legislation.
RELATED LEGISLATION
AB 319 (Rodriguez, 2015) requires high schools to provide instruction in performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and the use of an automated external defibrillator (AED) as part of a physical education course or another course required for graduation. AB 319 is pending in the Assembly Education Committee.
PRIOR LEGISLATION
AB 223 (Ma, 2009) required the San Francisco Board of Education to make Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps courses available to pupils under its jurisdiction in grades 9 to 12. AB 223 was amended to relate to a different subject matter.
AB 351 (Salas, 2009) authorized a school district that provides the following courses or programs to exempt any student participating in such a course or program from attending courses of physical education and from the physical education high school graduation requirement:
California Cadet Corps.
Cheer team or Dance team.
Color guard or Drill team.
Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps.
Marching band.
AB 351 was passed by the Assembly Education Committee, amended on the Assembly Floor, and re-referred to the Assembly Education Committee where it was held.
SUPPORT
California Circuit Finals Rodeo
California High School Rodeo Association
California Horse Council
Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association
Rodeo Club Advisor, Oakdale High School
OPPOSITION
California Association for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance
-- END --
Discussed in Hearing
Assembly Standing Committee on Education
Senate Floor
Senate Standing Committee on Education
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):