Bills

SB 329: Charter schools: petition and report and review at public hearing: competitive bidding.

  • Session Year: 2015-2016
  • House: Senate
Version:

(1)Existing law, the Charter Schools Act of 1992 (the Charter Schools Act), specifies the petition process for the establishment of a charter school within a school district. As part of that process, the Charter Schools Act requires, no later than 30 days after receiving a petition, the governing board of a school district to hold a public hearing on the provisions of the charter, at which time the governing board of the school district is required to consider the level of support for the petition by teachers employed by the school district, other employees of the school district, and parents.

This bill would require the governing board of a school district to also consider a report assessing whether school district staff has the capacity to conduct oversight of the charter school described in the petition and a report of the anticipated financial and educational impact on the other schools that the governing board of the school district has oversight obligations for. By imposing additional duties on school district officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

(2)The Charter Schools Act prohibits the governing board of a school district from denying a petition for the establishment of a charter school unless it makes written factual findings, specific to the particular petition, to support one or more specific findings, including, among others, that the petition lacks the requisite number of signatures or that the charter school presents an unsound educational program. If the governing board of the school district denies the petition, the Charter Schools Act authorizes the petitioners to elect to submit the petition to the county board of education, and if the county board of education denies the petition, to submit the petition to the State Board of Education, and requires the county board of education and the state board to review the petition pursuant to the provisions applicable to the governing board of a school district.

This bill would add having a negative fiscal impact on the school district to the list of specific findings sufficient to authorize the governing board of a school district to deny a petition, as provided.

(3)

(2)The Charter Schools Act specifies a separate petition process for the establishment of a countywide charter school. As part of that separate process, the Charter Schools Act requires, no later than 60 days after receiving a petition, a county board of education to hold a public hearing on the provisions of the charter, at which time the county board of education is required to consider the level of support for the petition by teachers, parents or guardians, and the school districts where the charter school petitioner proposes to place school facilities.

This bill would require a county board of education to also consider a report assessing whether county office of education staff has the capacity to conduct oversight of the charter school described in the petition and a report of the anticipated financial and educational impact on the other schools that the governing board of a school district has oversight obligations for. By imposing additional duties on county boards of education, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

(4)The Charter Schools Act requires a county board of education to deny a petition for the establishment of a countywide charter school if it makes certain findings, including, among others, that the petition lacks the requisite number of signatures or that the charter school presents an unsound educational program. The Charter Schools Act also specifies a separate petition process for the establishment of a state charter school whereby the petition is submitted directly to the State Board of Education, and authorizes the state board to deny a petition for any of the reasons that require a county board of education to deny a petition.

This bill would require a county board of education to, and would thus authorize the state board to, deny a petition if it finds that the charter school would have a negative financial impact on a school district, as provided. To the extent this bill would impose additional duties on a county board of education, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

(5)

(3)Existing law, the Local Agency Public Construction Act (the act), sets forth the requirements for competitive bidding on various types of contracts awarded by state and local agencies, including a school district. The act requires, among other things, the governing board of a school district to let contracts for the purchase of equipment, materials, or supplies to be furnished, leased, or sold to the school district, services other than construction services, and certain repairs, involving an expenditure of more than $50,000, and to let contracts for public projects, as defined, involving an expenditure of $15,000 or more, to the lowest responsible bidder who gives security as the governing board of the school district requires.

This bill would apply the provisions of the act applicable to school districts to charter schools. By imposing additional duties on charter school officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

(6)

(4)This bill also would update references and make other nonsubstantive changes.

(7)

(5)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Discussed in Hearing

Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations1MIN
May 18, 2015

Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations

Senate Standing Committee on Education33MIN
Apr 22, 2015

Senate Standing Committee on Education

View Older Hearings

Bill Author

News Coverage: