AB 1771: Planning and zoning: regional housing needs assessment.
- Session Year: 2017-2018
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2018-09-30
(1)The Planning and Zoning Law requires counties and cities to adopt a comprehensive, long-term plan for the physical development of the county or city and certain land outside its boundaries that includes, among other specified mandatory elements, a housing element. That law, for the fourth and subsequent revisions of the housing element, requires the Department of Housing and Community Development to determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region in accordance with specified requirements. That law requires the appropriate council of governments, or, for cities and counties without a council of governments, the department, to adopt a final regional housing need allocation plan that allocates a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county and is consistent with specified objectives, including that the plan increase the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner. Existing law defines the term household income levels for purposes of these provisions.
This bill would revise the objectives required to be addressed in the regional housing needs allocation plan and additionally require the plan to include an objective to increase access to areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents, while avoiding displacement and affirmatively furthering fair housing. The bill would also define the term areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents for purposes of these provisions.
(2)Existing law requires actions by local agencies related to the regional housing needs allocation plan to be consistent with those specified objectives.
The bill would instead require various actions by local agencies related to the regional housing needs allocation plan to further the objectives required to be addressed by the plan.
(3)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, to develop a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or subregion, as applicable, that is consistent with specified objectives. Existing law requires the council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to provide the proposed methodology, along with any relevant underlying data and assumptions, an explanation of how information about local government conditions gathered has been used to develop the proposed methodology, and how each of the factors required to be addressed by the regional housing needs allocation plan is incorporated into the methodology, to all cities, counties, any subregions, and members of the public who have made a written request for the proposed methodology.
This bill would require the council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to additionally provide, along with the proposed methodology, an explanation of how the proposed methodology furthers the objectives required to be addressed by the regional housing needs allocation plan. The bill would authorize members of the public to make an electronic request for the proposed methodology and accompanying materials, and would require the information and any other supporting materials used in determining the methodology to be published on the council of governments or delegate subregions Internet Web site.
(4)Existing law, for cities and counties without a council of governments, requires the department to determine and distribute the existing and projected housing need, but authorizes the department to delegate this responsibility to cities and counties if certain requirements are met.
This bill would provide that statutory changes enacted after the date the department issued a final determination of the distribution of the existing and projected housing needs is not a basis for a revision of the final determination.
(5)Existing law requires each council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to include specified factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs, including, among others, each member jurisdictions existing and projected jobs and housing relationship, the market demand for housing, and high housing cost burdens, as specified.
This bill would require each council of governments or delegate subregion to develop the proposed methodology in consultation with the department. The bill would revise these factors, and additionally require the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to consider the rate of overcrowding and the percentage of existing households at each specified income level that are paying more than 30% and more than 50% of their income in rent.
(6)Existing law requires each council of governments, no more than 6 months prior to the development of a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected housing need, to survey each of its member jurisdictions to request, at a minimum, information regarding those factors that will allow the development of a methodology.
This bill would require the survey to review and compile information relating to the objective of affirmatively furthering fair housing, as specified. The bill would require the council of governments to electronically report the results of the survey, as specified.
(7)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregions, as applicable, to identify any existing local, regional, or state incentives available to those local governments that are willing to accept a higher share than proposed in the draft allocation, as specified.
This bill would repeal this provision.
(8)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, following the 60-day public comment period, to adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology and provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, or delegate subregions, as applicable, and to the department.
This bill would instead require the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, following the public comment period, to publish a draft allocation methodology on its Internet Web site and submit the draft allocation methodology to the department. The bill would require the department to determine whether the methodology furthers the objectives described above. If the department determines that the methodology does not further the objectives, the bill would require the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, to take specified actions with respect to the housing need allocation methodology, including providing notice to the jurisdictions or applicable subregions and publishing the adopted allocation methodology on its Internet Web site.
(9)Existing law requires each council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to distribute a draft allocation of regional housing needs to each local government within the region or subregion, as provided, at least 1.5 years prior to the scheduled revision of its housing element. Existing law authorizes a local government to request from the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, a revision of its share of the regional housing need, in accordance with specified factors, within 60 days following receipt of the draft allocation. Under existing law, if the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, does not accept the proposed revised share or modify the revised share to the satisfaction of the requesting party, the local government may appeal its draft allocation based on specified criteria.
This bill would instead authorize a local government within the region or the delegate subregion, as applicable, or the department to, within 45 days of receipt of the draft allocation, appeal to the council of governments or the delegate subregion for a revision of the share of the regional housing need proposed to be allocated to one or more local governments. The bill would specify criteria for the appeal and would require the local council of governments or the delegate subregion, as applicable, to notify all other local governments of all appeals, as specified. The bill would require the council of governments or the delegate region, as applicable, to hold a public hearing and consider comments received regarding the appeal. The bill would then require the council of governments or the delegate subregion, as applicable, to make a final determination on the appeal and issue a final allocation plan, as specified.
(10)Existing law, for the 4th and subsequent revisions of the housing element, requires the department to determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region, as provided, and requires the appropriate council of governments, or for cities and counties without a council of governments, the department, to adopt a final regional housing need plan allocating a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county. Existing law requires the department to meet and consult with the council of governments regarding the assumptions and methodology to be used by the department to determine the regions housing needs and requires the council of governments to provide data assumptions, including specified information regarding housing availability within the region.
This bill would require that the information provided by the council of governments include the loss of units during a state of emergency, as defined, that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act, during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision of the housing element that have not been rebuilt or replaced at the time of the data request.
(11)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, to develop a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or subregion, as applicable, that is consistent with specified objectives. Existing law, to the extent that sufficient data is available as provided, requires each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, to include specified factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs.
This bill would require that these factors include the loss of units during a state of emergency, as defined, that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision of the housing element that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the analysis.
(12)This bill would incorporate additional changes to Sections 65584, 65584.01, and 65584.04 of the Government Code proposed by SB 828 to be operative only if this bill and SB 828 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
(13)By adding to the duties of councils of governments and delegate subregions with respect to the distribution of regional housing need, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(1)The Planning and Zoning Law requires counties and cities to adopt a comprehensive, long-term plan for the physical development of the county or city and certain land outside its boundaries that includes, among other specified mandatory elements, a housing element. That law, for the fourth and subsequent revisions of the housing element, requires the Department of Housing and Community Development to determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region in accordance with specified requirements. That law requires the appropriate council of governments, or, for cities and counties without a council of governments, the department, to adopt a final regional housing need allocation plan that allocates a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county and is consistent with specified objectives, including that the plan increase the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner. Existing law defines the term household income levels for purposes of these provisions.
This bill would revise the objectives required to be addressed in the regional housing needs allocation plan and additionally require the plan to include an objective to increase access to areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents, while avoiding displacement and affirmatively furthering fair housing. The bill would also define the term areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents for purposes of these provisions.
(2)Existing law requires actions by local agencies related to the regional housing needs allocation plan to be consistent with those specified objectives.
The bill would instead require various actions by local agencies related to the regional housing needs allocation plan to further the objectives required to be addressed by the plan.
(3)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, to develop a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or subregion, as applicable, that is consistent with specified objectives. Existing law requires the council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to provide the proposed methodology, along with any relevant underlying data and assumptions, an explanation of how information about local government conditions gathered has been used to develop the proposed methodology, and how each of the factors required to be addressed by the regional housing needs allocation plan is incorporated into the methodology, to all cities, counties, any subregions, and members of the public who have made a written request for the proposed methodology.
This bill would require the council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to additionally provide, along with the proposed methodology, an explanation of how the proposed methodology furthers the objectives required to be addressed by the regional housing needs allocation plan. The bill would authorize members of the public to make an electronic request for the proposed methodology and accompanying materials, and would require the information and any other supporting materials used in determining the methodology to be published on the council of governments or delegate subregions Internet Web site.
(4)Existing law, for cities and counties without a council of governments, requires the department to determine and distribute the existing and projected housing need, but authorizes the department to delegate this responsibility to cities and counties if certain requirements are met.
This bill would provide that statutory changes enacted after the date the department issued a final determination of the distribution of the existing and projected housing needs is not a basis for a revision of the final determination.
(5)Existing law requires each council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to include specified factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs, including, among others, each member jurisdictions existing and projected jobs and housing relationship, the market demand for housing, and high housing cost burdens, as specified.
This bill would require each council of governments or delegate subregion to develop the proposed methodology in consultation with the department. The bill would revise these factors, and additionally require the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to consider the rate of overcrowding and the percentage of existing households at each specified income level that are paying more than 30% and more than 50% of their income in rent.
(6)Existing law requires each council of governments, no more than 6 months prior to the development of a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected housing need, to survey each of its member jurisdictions to request, at a minimum, information regarding those factors that will allow the development of a methodology.
This bill would require the survey to review and compile information relating to the objective of affirmatively furthering fair housing, as specified. The bill would require the council of governments to electronically report the results of the survey, as specified.
(7)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregions, as applicable, to identify any existing local, regional, or state incentives available to those local governments that are willing to accept a higher share than proposed in the draft allocation, as specified.
This bill would repeal this provision.
(8)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, following the 60-day public comment period, to adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology and provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, or delegate subregions, as applicable, and to the department.
This bill would instead require the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, following the public comment period, to publish a draft allocation methodology on its Internet Web site and submit the draft allocation methodology to the department. The bill would require the department to determine whether the methodology furthers the objectives described above. If the department determines that the methodology does not further the objectives, the bill would require the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, to take specified actions with respect to the housing need allocation methodology, including providing notice to the jurisdictions or applicable subregions and publishing the adopted allocation methodology on its Internet Web site.
(9)Existing law requires each council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to distribute a draft allocation of regional housing needs to each local government within the region or subregion, as provided, at least 1.5 years prior to the scheduled revision of its housing element. Existing law authorizes a local government to request from the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, a revision of its share of the regional housing need, in accordance with specified factors, within 60 days following receipt of the draft allocation. Under existing law, if the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, does not accept the proposed revised share or modify the revised share to the satisfaction of the requesting party, the local government may appeal its draft allocation based on specified criteria.
This bill would instead authorize a local government within the region or the delegate subregion, as applicable, or the department to, within 45 days of receipt of the draft allocation, appeal to the council of governments or the delegate subregion for a revision of the share of the regional housing need proposed to be allocated to one or more local governments. The bill would specify criteria for the appeal and would require the local council of governments or the delegate subregion, as applicable, to notify all other local governments of all appeals, as specified. The bill would require the council of governments or the delegate region, as applicable, to hold a public hearing and consider comments received regarding the appeal. The bill would then require the council of governments or the delegate subregion, as applicable, to make a final determination on the appeal and issue a final allocation plan, as specified.
(10)Existing law, for the 4th and subsequent revisions of the housing element, requires the department to determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region, as provided, and requires the appropriate council of governments, or for cities and counties without a council of governments, the department, to adopt a final regional housing need plan allocating a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county. Existing law requires the department to meet and consult with the council of governments regarding the assumptions and methodology to be used by the department to determine the regions housing needs and requires the council of governments to provide data assumptions, including specified information regarding housing availability within the region.
This bill would require that the information provided by the council of governments include the loss of units during a state of emergency, as defined, that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act, during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision of the housing element that have not been rebuilt or replaced at the time of the data request.
(11)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, to develop a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or subregion, as applicable, that is consistent with specified objectives. Existing law, to the extent that sufficient data is available as provided, requires each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, to include specified factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs.
This bill would require that these factors include the loss of units during a state of emergency, as defined, that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision of the housing element that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the analysis.
(12)This bill would incorporate additional changes to Sections 65584, 65584.01, and 65584.04 of the Government Code proposed by SB 828 to be operative only if this bill and SB 828 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
(13)By adding to the duties of councils of governments and delegate subregions with respect to the distribution of regional housing need, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(1)The Planning and Zoning Law requires counties and cities to adopt a comprehensive, long-term plan for the physical development of the county or city and certain land outside its boundaries that includes, among other specified mandatory elements, a housing element. That law, for the fourth and subsequent revisions of the housing element, requires the Department of Housing and Community Development to determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region in accordance with specified requirements. That law requires the appropriate council of governments, or, for cities and counties without a council of governments, the department, to adopt a final regional housing need allocation plan that allocates a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county and is consistent with specified objectives, including that the plan increase the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner. Existing law defines the term household income levels for purposes of these provisions.
This bill would revise the objectives required to be addressed in the regional housing needs allocation plan and additionally require the plan to include an objective to increase access to areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents, while avoiding displacement and affirmatively furthering fair housing. The bill would also define the term areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents for purposes of these provisions.
(2)Existing law requires actions by local agencies related to the regional housing needs allocation plan to be consistent with those specified objectives.
The bill would instead require various actions by local agencies related to the regional housing needs allocation plan to further the objectives required to be addressed by the plan.
(3)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, to develop a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or subregion, as applicable, that is consistent with specified objectives. Existing law requires the council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to provide the proposed methodology, along with any relevant underlying data and assumptions, an explanation of how information about local government conditions gathered has been used to develop the proposed methodology, and how each of the factors required to be addressed by the regional housing needs allocation plan is incorporated into the methodology, to all cities, counties, any subregions, and members of the public who have made a written request for the proposed methodology.
This bill would require the council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to additionally provide, along with the proposed methodology, an explanation of how the proposed methodology furthers the objectives required to be addressed by the regional housing needs allocation plan. The bill would authorize members of the public to make an electronic request for the proposed methodology and accompanying materials, and would require the information and any other supporting materials used in determining the methodology to be published on the council of governments or delegate subregions Internet Web site.
(4)Existing law, for cities and counties without a council of governments, requires the department to determine and distribute the existing and projected housing need, but authorizes the department to delegate this responsibility to cities and counties if certain requirements are met.
This bill would provide that statutory changes enacted after the date the department issued a final determination of the distribution of the existing and projected housing needs is not a basis for a revision of the final determination.
(4)(5)Existing law requires each council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to include specified factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs, including, among others, each member jurisdictions existing and projected jobs and housing relationship, the market demand for housing, and high housing cost burdens, as specified.
This bill would require each council of governments or delegate subregion to develop the proposed methodology in consultation with the department. The bill would revise these factors, and additionally require the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to consider the rate of overcrowding and the percentage of existing households at each specified income level that are paying more than 30% and more than 50% of their income in rent.
(6)Existing law requires each council of governments, no more than 6 months prior to the development of a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected housing need, to survey each of its member jurisdictions to request, at a minimum, information regarding those factors that will allow the development of a methodology.
This bill would require the survey to review and compile information relating to the objective of affirmatively furthering fair housing, as specified. The bill would require the council of governments to electronically report the results of the survey, as specified.
(5)(7)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregions, as applicable, to identify any existing local, regional, or state incentives available to those local governments that are willing to accept a higher share than proposed in the draft allocation, as specified.
This bill would repeal this provision.
(6)(8)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, following the 60-day public comment period, to adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology and provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, or delegate subregions, as applicable, and to the department.
This bill would instead require the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, following the public comment period, to publish a draft allocation methodology on its Internet Web site and submit the draft allocation methodology to the department. The bill would require the department to determine whether the methodology furthers the objectives described above. If the department determines that the methodology does not further the objectives, the bill would require the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, to take specified actions with respect to the housing need allocation methodology, including providing notice to the jurisdictions or applicable subregions and publishing the adopted allocation methodology on its Internet Web site.
(7)(9)Existing law requires each council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to distribute a draft allocation of regional housing needs to each local government within the region or subregion, as provided, at least 1.5 years prior to the scheduled revision of its housing element. Existing law authorizes a local government to request from the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, a revision of its share of the regional housing need, in accordance with specified factors, within 60 days following receipt of the draft allocation. Under existing law, if the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, does not accept the proposed revised share or modify the revised share to the satisfaction of the requesting party, the local government may appeal its draft allocation based on specified criteria.
This bill would instead authorize a local government within the region or the delegate subregion, as applicable, or the department to, within 45 days of receipt of the draft allocation, appeal to the council of governments or the delegate subregion for a revision of the share of the regional housing need proposed to be allocated to one or more local governments. The bill would specify criteria for the appeal and would require the local council of governments or the delegate subregion, as applicable, to notify all other local governments of all appeals, as specified. The bill would require the council of governments or the delegate region, as applicable, to hold a public hearing and consider comments received regarding the appeal. The bill would then require the council of governments or the delegate subregion, as applicable, to make a final determination on the appeal and issue a final allocation plan, as specified.
(10)Existing law, for the 4th and subsequent revisions of the housing element, requires the department to determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region, as provided, and requires the appropriate council of governments, or for cities and counties without a council of governments, the department, to adopt a final regional housing need plan allocating a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county. Existing law requires the department to meet and consult with the council of governments regarding the assumptions and methodology to be used by the department to determine the regions housing needs and requires the council of governments to provide data assumptions, including specified information regarding housing availability within the region.
This bill would require that the information provided by the council of governments include the loss of units during a state of emergency, as defined, that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act, during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision of the housing element that have not been rebuilt or replaced at the time of the data request.
(11)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, to develop a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or subregion, as applicable, that is consistent with specified objectives. Existing law, to the extent that sufficient data is available as provided, requires each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, to include specified factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs.
This bill would require that these factors include the loss of units during a state of emergency, as defined, that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision of the housing element that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the analysis.
(12)This bill would incorporate additional changes to Sections 65584, 65584.01, and 65584.04 of the Government Code proposed by SB 828 to be operative only if this bill and SB 828 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
(8)(13)By adding to the duties of councils of governments and delegate subregions with respect to the distribution of regional housing need, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(1)The Planning and Zoning Law requires counties and cities to adopt a comprehensive, long-term plan for the physical development of the county or city and certain land outside its boundaries that includes, among other specified mandatory elements, a housing element. That law, for the fourth and subsequent revisions of the housing element, requires the Department of Housing and Community Development to determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region in accordance with specified requirements. That law requires the appropriate council of governments, or, for cities and counties without a council of governments, the department, to adopt a final regional housing need allocation plan that allocates a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county and is consistent with specified objectives, including that the plan increase the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner. Existing law defines the term household income levels for purposes of these provisions.
This bill would revise the objectives required to be addressed in the regional housing needs allocation plan and additionally require the plan to include an objective to increase access to areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents, while avoiding displacement and affirmatively furthering fair housing. The bill would also define the term areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents for purposes of these provisions.
(2)Existing law requires actions by local agencies related to the regional housing needs allocation plan to be consistent with those specified objectives.
The bill would instead require various actions by local agencies related to the regional housing needs allocation plan to further the objectives required to be addressed by the plan.
(3)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, to develop a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or subregion, as applicable, that is consistent with specified objectives. Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, to conduct at least one public hearing on the proposed methodology. Existing law requires the council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to provide the proposed methodology, along with any relevant underlying data and assumptions, an explanation of how information about local government conditions gathered has been used to develop the proposed methodology, and how each of the factors required to be addressed by the regional housing needs allocation plan is incorporated into the methodology, to all cities, counties, any subregions, and members of the public who have made a written request for the proposed methodology.
This bill would require the council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to hold at least two public hearings. The bill would also require the council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to additionally provide, along with the proposed methodology, an explanation of how the proposed methodology furthers the objectives required to be addressed by the regional housing needs allocation plan. The bill would authorize members of the public to make an electronic request for the proposed methodology and accompanying materials. materials, and would require the information to be published on the council of governments or delegate subregions Internet Web site.
(4)Existing law requires each council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to include specified factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs, including, among others, each member jurisdictions existing and projected jobs and housing relationship, the market demand for housing, and high housing cost burdens, as specified.
This bill would require each council of governments or delegate subregion to develop the proposed methodology in consultation with the department. The bill would revise these factors, and additionally require the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to consider the rate of overcrowding, the existing and projected demand for housing at various income levels, overcrowding and the percentage of existing households at each specified income levels level that are paying more than 30% and more than 50% of their income in rent.
(5)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregions, as applicable, to identify any existing local, regional, or state incentives available to those local governments that are willing to accept a higher share than proposed in the draft allocation, as specified.
This bill would repeal this provision.
(6)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, following the 60-day public comment period, to adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology and provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, or delegate subregions, as applicable, and to the department.
This bill would instead require the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, following the public comment period, to publish a draft allocation methodology on its Internet Web site and submit the draft allocation methodology to the department. The bill would require the department to determine whether the methodology furthers the objectives described above. The If the department determines that the methodology does not further the objectives, the bill would require the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, following the receipt of the departments determination, to make any necessary changes and adopt the final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology, as specified. to take specified actions with respect to the housing need allocation methodology, including providing notice to the jurisdictions or applicable subregions and publishing the adopted allocation methodology on its Internet Web site.
(7)Existing law requires each council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to distribute a draft allocation of regional housing needs to each local government within the region or subregion, as provided, at least 1.5 years prior to the scheduled revision of its housing element. Existing law authorizes a local government to request from the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, a revision of its share of the regional housing need, in accordance with specified factors, within 60 days following receipt of the draft allocation. Under existing law, if the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, does not accept the proposed revised share or modify the revised share to the satisfaction of the requesting party, the local government may appeal its draft allocation based on specified criteria.
This bill would additionally instead authorize a local government within the region or the delegate subregion, as applicable, or the department to, within 45 days of receipt of the draft allocation, appeal to the council of governments or the delegate subregion for a revision of the share of the regional housing need proposed to be allocated to one or more local governments. The bill would specify criteria for the appeal and would require the local council of governments or the delegate subregion, as applicable, to notify all other local governments of all appeals, as specified. The bill would require the council of governments or the delegate region, as applicable, to hold a public hearing and consider comments received regarding the appeal. The bill would then require the council of governments or the delegate subregion, as applicable, to make a final determination on the appeal and issue a final allocation plan, as specified.
(8)By adding to the duties of councils of governments and delegate subregions with respect to the distribution of regional housing need, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(1)The Planning and Zoning Law requires counties and cities to adopt a comprehensive, long-term plan for the physical development of the county or city and certain land outside its boundaries that includes, among other specified mandatory elements, a housing element. That law, for the fourth and subsequent revisions of the housing element, requires the Department of Housing and Community Development to determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region in accordance with specified requirements. That law requires the appropriate council of governments, or, for cities and counties without a council of governments, the department, to adopt a final regional housing need allocation plan that allocates a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county and is consistent with specified objectives, including that the plan increase the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner. Existing law defines the term household income levels for purposes of these provisions.
This bill would revise the objectives required to be addressed in the regional housing needs allocation plan and additionally require the plan to include an objective to increase access to areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents, while avoiding displacement and affirmatively furthering fair housing. The bill would also define the term areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents for purposes of these provisions.
(2)Existing law requires actions by local agencies related to the regional housing needs allocation plan to be consistent with those specified objectives.
The bill would instead require various actions by local agencies related to the regional housing needs allocation plan to further the objectives required to be addressed by the plan.
(3)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, to develop a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or subregion, as applicable, that is consistent with specified objectives. Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, to conduct at least one public hearing on the proposed methodology. Existing law requires the council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to provide the proposed methodology, along with any relevant underlying data and assumptions, an explanation of how information about local government conditions gathered has been used to develop the proposed methodology, and how each of the factors required to be addressed by the regional housing needs allocation plan is incorporated into the methodology, to all cities, counties, any subregions, and members of the public who have made a written request for the proposed methodology.
This bill would require the council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to hold at least two public hearings. The bill would also require the council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to additionally provide, along with the proposed methodology, an explanation of how the proposed methodology furthers the objectives required to be addressed by the regional housing needs allocation plan. The bill would eliminate the requirement that authorize members of the public to make a written an electronic request for the proposed methodology and accompanying materials.
(4)Existing law requires each council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to include specified factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs, including, among others, each member jurisdictions existing and projected jobs and housing relationship, the market demand for housing, and high housing cost burdens, as specified.
This bill would revise these factors, and additionally require the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to consider the rate of overcrowding, the existing and projected demand for housing at various income levels, and the percentage of existing households at each specified income levels that are paying more than 30% and more than 50% of their income in rent.
(5)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregions, as applicable, to identify any existing local, regional, or state incentives available to those local governments that are willing to accept a higher share than proposed in the draft allocation, as specified.
This bill would repeal this provision.
(6)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, following the 60-day public comment period, to adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology and provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, or delegate subregions, as applicable, and to the department.
This bill would instead require the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, following the public comment period, to submit the draft allocation methodology to the department. The bill would require the department to determine whether the methodology furthers the objectives described above. The bill would require the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, following the receipt of the departments determination, to make any necessary changes and adopt the final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology, as specified.
(7)Existing law requires each council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to distribute a draft allocation of regional housing needs to each local government within the region or subregion, as provided, at least 1.5 years prior to the scheduled revision of its housing element. Existing law authorizes a local government to request from the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, a revision of its share of the regional housing need, in accordance with specified factors, within 60 days following receipt of the draft allocation. Under existing law, if the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, does not accept the proposed revised share or modify the revised share to the satisfaction of the requesting party, the local government may appeal its draft allocation based on specified criteria.
This bill would additionally authorize a housing organization, as defined, to request from the council of governments or local government within the region or the delegate subregion, as applicable, or the department to, within 45 days of receipt of the draft allocation, appeal to the council of governments or the delegate subregion for a revision of the share of the regional housing need proposed to be allocated to one or more local government. This bill would authorize the local government or the housing organization, if the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, does not accept the proposed revised share or modify the revised share to the satisfaction of the requesting party, to appeal the draft allocation to the Department of Housing and Community Development, as specified. governments. The bill would specify criteria for the appeal and would require the local council of governments or the delegate subregion, as applicable, to notify all other local governments of all appeals, as specified. The bill would require the council of governments or the delegate region, as applicable, to hold a public hearing and consider comments received regarding the appeal. The bill would then require the council of governments or the delegate subregion, as applicable, to make a final determination on the appeal and issue a final allocation plan, as specified.
(8)By adding to the duties of councils of governments and delegate subregions with respect to the distribution of regional housing need, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(1)The Planning and Zoning Law requires counties and cities to adopt a comprehensive, long-term plan for the physical development of the county or city and certain land outside its boundaries that includes, among other specified mandatory elements, a housing element. That law, for the fourth and subsequent revisions of the housing element, requires the Department of Housing and Community Development to determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region in accordance with specified requirements. That law requires the appropriate council of governments, or, for cities and counties without a council of governments, the department, to adopt a final regional housing need allocation plan that allocates a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county and is consistent with specified objectives, including that the plan increase the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner. Existing law defines the term household income levels for purposes of these provisions.
This bill would revise the objectives required to be addressed in the regional housing needs allocation plan and additionally require the plan to include an objective to increase access to areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents, while avoiding displacement and affirmatively furthering fair housing. The bill would also define the term areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents for purposes of these provisions.
(2)Existing law requires actions by local agencies related to the regional housing needs allocation plan to be consistent with those specified objectives.
The bill would instead require various actions by local agencies related to the regional housing needs allocation plan to further, and not undermine, the intent of the further the objectives required to be addressed by the plan.
(3)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, to develop a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or subregion, as applicable, that is consistent with specified objectives. Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, to conduct at least one public hearing on the proposed methodology. Existing law requires the council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to provide the proposed methodology, along with any relevant underlying data and assumptions, an explanation of how information about local government conditions gathered has been used to develop the proposed methodology, and how each of the factors required to be addressed by the regional housing needs allocation plan is incorporated into the methodology, to all cities, counties, any subregions, and members of the public who have made a written request for the proposed methodology.
This bill would require the council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to hold at least two public hearings. The bill would also require the council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to additionally provide, along with the proposed methodology, an explanation of how the proposed methodology furthers, and does not undermine, the intent of the furthers the objectives required to be addressed by the regional housing needs allocation plan. The bill would eliminate the requirement that members of the public make a written request for the proposed methodology and accompanying materials.
(4)Existing law requires each council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to include specified factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs, including, among others, each member jurisdictions existing and projected jobs and housing relationship, the market demand for housing, and high housing cost burdens, as specified.
This bill would revise these factors, and additionally require the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to consider the rate of overcrowding, the existing and projected demand for housing at various income levels, and the percentage of existing households at each specified income levels that are paying more than 30% and more than 50% of their income in rent.
(5)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregions, as applicable, to identify any existing local, regional, or state incentives available to those local governments that are willing to accept a higher share than proposed in the draft allocation, as specified.
This bill would repeal this provision.
(6)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, following the 60-day public comment period, to adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology and provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, or delegate subregions, as applicable, and to the department.
This bill would instead require the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, following the public comment period, to submit the draft allocation methodology to the department. The bill would require the department to determine whether the methodology furthers, and does not undermine furthers the objectives described above. The bill would require the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, following the receipt of the departments determination, to make any necessary changes and adopt the final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology, as specified.
(7)Existing law requires each council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to distribute a draft allocation of regional housing needs to each local government within the region or subregion, as provided, at least 1.5 years prior to the scheduled revision of its housing element. Existing law authorizes a local government to request from the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, a revision of its share of the regional housing need, in accordance with specified factors, within 60 days following receipt of the draft allocation. Under existing law, if the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, does not accept the proposed revised share or modify the revised share to the satisfaction of the requesting party, the local government may appeal its draft allocation based on specified criteria.
This bill would additionally authorize a housing organization, as defined, to request from the council of governments or the delegate subregion, as applicable, a revision of the share of the regional housing need allocated to one or more local government. This bill would authorize the local government or the housing organization, if the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, does not accept the proposed revised share or modify the revised share to the satisfaction of the requesting party, to appeal the draft allocation to the Department of Housing and Community Development, as specified.
(8)By adding to the duties of councils of governments and delegate subregions with respect to the distribution of regional housing need, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(1)The Planning and Zoning Law requires counties and cities to adopt a comprehensive, long-term plan for the physical development of the county or city and certain land outside its boundaries that includes, among other specified mandatory elements, a housing element. That law, for the fourth and subsequent revisions of the housing element, requires the Department of Housing and Community Development to determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region in accordance with specified requirements. That law requires the appropriate council of governments, or, for cities and counties without a council of governments, the department, to adopt a final regional housing need allocation plan that allocates a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county and is consistent with specified objectives, including that the plan increase the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner.
This bill would revise the objectives required to be addressed in the regional housing needs allocation plan and additionally require the plan to include an objective to increase access to areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents, while avoiding displacement and affirmatively furthering fair housing.
(2)Existing law requires actions by local agencies related to the regional housing needs allocation plan to be consistent with those specified objectives.
The bill would instead require various actions by local agencies related to the regional housing needs allocation plan to further, and not undermine, the intent of the objectives required to be addressed by the plan.
(3)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, to develop a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or subregion, as applicable, that is consistent with specified objectives. Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, to conduct at least one public hearing on the proposed methodology. Existing law requires the council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to provide the proposed methodology, along with any relevant underlying data and assumptions, an explanation of how information about local government conditions gathered has been used to develop the proposed methodology, and how each of the factors required to be addressed by the regional housing needs allocation plan is incorporated into the methodology, to all cities, counties, any subregions, and members of the public who have made a written request for the proposed methodology.
This bill would require the council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to hold at least two public hearings. The bill would also require the council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to additionally provide, along with the proposed methodology, an explanation of how the proposed methodology furthers, and does not undermine, the intent of the objectives required to be addressed by the regional housing needs allocation plan. The bill would eliminate the requirement that members of the public make a written request for the proposed methodology and accompanying materials.
(4)Existing law requires each council of governments or delegate subregion as applicable, to include specified factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs, including, among others, each member jurisdictions existing and projected jobs and housing relationship, the market demand for housing, and high housing cost burdens, as specified.
This bill would revise these factors, and additionally require the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to consider the rate of overcrowding, the existing and projected demand for housing at various income levels, and the percentage of existing households at each specified income levels that are paying more than 30% and more than 50% of their income in rent.
(5)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregions, as applicable, to identify any existing local, regional, or state incentives available to those local governments that are willing to accept a higher share than proposed in the draft allocation, as specified.
This bill would repeal this provision.
(6)Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, following the 60-day public comment period, to adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology and provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, or delegate subregions, as applicable, and to the department.
This bill would instead require the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, following the public comment period, to submit the draft allocation methodology to the department. The bill would require the department to determine whether the methodology furthers, and does not undermine the objectives described above. The bill would require the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, following the receipt of the departments determination, to make any necessary changes and adopt the final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology, as specified.
(7)Existing law requires each council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to distribute a draft allocation of regional housing needs to each local government within the region or subregion, as provided, at least 1.5 years prior to the scheduled revision of its housing element. Existing law authorizes a local government to request from the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, a revision of its share of the regional housing need, in accordance with specified factors, within 60 days following receipt of the draft allocation. Under existing law, if the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, does not accept the proposed revised share or modify the revised share to the satisfaction of the requesting party, the local government may appeal its draft allocation based on specified criteria.
This bill would additionally authorize a housing organization, as defined, to request from the council of governments or the delegate subregion, as applicable, a revision of the share of the regional housing need allocated to one or more local government. This bill would authorize the local government or the housing organization, if the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, does not accept the proposed revised share or modify the revised share to the satisfaction of the requesting party, to appeal the draft allocation to the Department of Housing and Community Development, as specified.
(8)By adding to the duties of councils of governments and delegate subregions with respect to the distribution of regional housing need, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Under existing law, the Legislature has declared that the availability of affordable housing is of vital statewide importance and requires cooperation at all levels of government. Existing law declares that local and state governments have a responsibility to use the powers vested in them to facilitate the improvement and development of housing to make adequate provisions for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community. Existing law provides for a council of governments, consisting of a single or multicounty council created by a joint powers agreement, and requires the Department of Housing and Community Development to consult with each council of governments to determine the existing and projected need for housing in each region, as specified.This bill would express the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would make changes to the process for distributing regional housing needs to various jurisdictions to ensure fairness and the achievement of stated goals regarding housing.Under existing law, the Legislature has declared that the availability of affordable housing is of vital statewide importance and requires cooperation at all levels of government. Existing law declares that local and state governments have a responsibility to use the powers vested in them to facilitate the improvement and development of housing to make adequate provisions for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community. Existing law provides for a council of governments, consisting of a single or multicounty council created by a joint powers agreement, and requires the Department of Housing and Community Development to consult with each council of governments to determine the existing and projected need for housing in each region, as specified.
This bill would express the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would make changes to the process for distributing regional housing needs to various jurisdictions to ensure fairness and the achievement of stated goals regarding housing.
(a)(1)For the fourth and subsequent revisions of the housing element pursuant to Section 65588, the department shall determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region pursuant to this article. For purposes of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, the share of a city or county of the regional housing need shall include that share of the housing need of persons at all income levels within the area significantly affected by the general plan of the city or county.
(2)While it is the intent of the Legislature that cities, counties, and cities and counties should undertake all necessary actions to encourage, promote, and facilitate the development of housing to accommodate the entire regional housing need, it is recognized, however, that future housing production may not equal the regional housing need established for planning purposes.
(3)The Legislature finds and declares that insufficient housing in job centers hinders the states environmental quality and runs counter to the states environmental goals. In particular, when Californians seeking affordable housing are forced to drive longer distances to work, an increased amount of greenhouse gases and other pollutants is released and puts in jeopardy the achievement of the states climate goals, as established pursuant to Section 38566 of the Health and Safety Code, and clean air goals.
(b)The department, in consultation with each council of governments, shall determine each regions existing and projected housing need pursuant to Section 65584.01 at least two years prior to the scheduled revision required pursuant to Section 65588. The appropriate council of governments, or for cities and counties without a council of governments, the department, shall adopt a final regional housing need plan that allocates a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county at least one year prior to the scheduled revision for the region required by Section 65588. The allocation plan prepared by a council of governments shall be prepared pursuant to Sections 65584.04 and 65584.05.
(c)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the due dates for the determinations of the department or for the council of governments, respectively, regarding the regional housing need may be extended by the department by not more than 60 days if the extension will enable access to more recent critical population or housing data from a pending or recent release of the United States Census Bureau or the Department of Finance. If the due date for the determination of the department or the council of governments is extended for this reason, the department shall extend the corresponding housing element revision deadline pursuant to Section 65588 by not more than 60 days.
(d)The regional housing needs allocation plan shall further all of the following objectives:
(1)Increasing the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner, which shall result in each jurisdiction receiving an allocation of units for low- and very low income households.
(2)Promoting infill development and socioeconomic equity, the protection of environmental and agricultural resources, the encouragement of efficient development patterns, and the achievement of the regions greenhouse gas reductions targets provided by the Air Resources Board pursuant to Section 65080.
(3)Promoting an improved intraregional relationship between jobs and housing, including an improved balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction.
(4)Allocating a lower proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately high share of households in that income category, as compared to the countywide distribution of households in that category from the most recent American Community Survey.
(5)Affirmatively furthering fair housing.
(e)For purposes of this section, affirmatively furthering fair housing means taking meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics. Specifically, affirmatively furthering fair housing means taking meaningful actions that, taken together, address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity, replacing segregated living patterns with truly integrated and balanced living patterns, transforming racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity, and fostering and maintaining compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws.
(f)For purposes of this section, household income levels are as determined by the department as of the most recent American Community Survey to the following code sections:
(1)Very low incomes as defined by Section 50105 of the Health and Safety Code.
(2)Lower incomes, as defined by Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
(3)Moderate incomes, as defined by Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(4)Above moderate incomes are those exceeding the moderate-income level of Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(g)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, determinations made by the department, a council of governments, or a city or county pursuant to this section or Section 65584.01, 65584.02, 65584.03, 65584.04, 65584.05, 65584.06, 65584.07, or 65584.08 are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code).
SEC. 1.5.Section 65584 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.(a)(1)For the fourth and subsequent revisions of the housing element pursuant to Section 65588, the department shall determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region pursuant to this article. For purposes of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, the share of a city or county of the regional housing need shall include that share of the housing need of persons at all income levels within the area significantly affected by the general plan of the city or county.
(2)It is the intent of the Legislature that cities, counties, and cities and counties should undertake all necessary actions to encourage, promote, and facilitate the development of housing to accommodate the entire regional housing need, and reasonable actions should be taken by local and regional governments to ensure that future housing production meets, at a minimum, the regional housing need established for planning purposes. These actions shall include applicable reforms and incentives in Section 65582.1.
(3)The Legislature finds and declares that insufficient housing in job centers hinders the states environmental quality and runs counter to the states environmental goals. In particular, when Californians seeking affordable housing are forced to drive longer distances to work, an increased amount of greenhouse gases and other pollutants is released and puts in jeopardy the achievement of the states climate goals, as established pursuant to Section 38566 of the Health and Safety Code, and clean air goals.
(b)The department, in consultation with each council of governments, shall determine each regions existing and projected housing need pursuant to Section 65584.01 at least two years prior to the scheduled revision required pursuant to Section 65588. The appropriate council of governments, or for cities and counties without a council of governments, the department, shall adopt a final regional housing need plan that allocates a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county at least one year prior to the scheduled revision for the region required by Section 65588. The allocation plan prepared by a council of governments shall be prepared pursuant to Sections 65584.04 and 65584.05.
(c)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the due dates for the determinations of the department or for the council of governments, respectively, regarding the regional housing need may be extended by the department by not more than 60 days if the extension will enable access to more recent critical population or housing data from a pending or recent release of the United States Census Bureau or the Department of Finance. If the due date for the determination of the department or the council of governments is extended for this reason, the department shall extend the corresponding housing element revision deadline pursuant to Section 65588 by not more than 60 days.
(d)The regional housing needs allocation plan shall further all of the following objectives:
(1)Increasing the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner, which shall result in each jurisdiction receiving an allocation of units for low- and very low income households.
(2)Promoting infill development and socioeconomic equity, the protection of environmental and agricultural resources, the encouragement of efficient development patterns, and the achievement of the regions greenhouse gas reductions targets provided by the State Air Resources Board pursuant to Section 65080.
(3)Promoting an improved intraregional relationship between jobs and housing, including an improved balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction.
(4)Allocating a lower proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately high share of households in that income category, as compared to the countywide distribution of households in that category from the most recent American Community Survey.
(5)Affirmatively furthering fair housing.
(e)For purposes of this section, affirmatively furthering fair housing means taking meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics. Specifically, affirmatively furthering fair housing means taking meaningful actions that, taken together, address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity, replacing segregated living patterns with truly integrated and balanced living patterns, transforming racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity, and fostering and maintaining compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws.
(f)For purposes of this section, household income levels are as determined by the department as of the most recent American Community Survey pursuant to the following code sections:
(1)Very low incomes as defined by Section 50105 of the Health and Safety Code.
(2)Lower incomes, as defined by Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
(3)Moderate incomes, as defined by Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(4)Above moderate incomes are those exceeding the moderate-income level of Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(g)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, determinations made by the department, a council of governments, or a city or county pursuant to this section or Section 65584.01, 65584.02, 65584.03, 65584.04, 65584.05, 65584.06, 65584.07, or 65584.08 are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code).
SEC. 2.Section 65584.01 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.01.For the fourth and subsequent revision of the housing element pursuant to Section 65588, the department, in consultation with each council of governments, where applicable, shall determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region in the following manner:
(a)The departments determination shall be based upon population projections produced by the Department of Finance and regional population forecasts used in preparing regional transportation plans, in consultation with each council of governments. If the total regional population forecast for the projection year, developed by the council of governments and used for the preparation of the regional transportation plan, is within a range of 1.5 percent of the total regional population forecast for the projection year by the Department of Finance, then the population forecast developed by the council of governments shall be the basis from which the department determines the existing and projected need for housing in the region. If the difference between the total population projected by the council of governments and the total population projected for the region by the Department of Finance is greater than 1.5 percent, then the department and the council of governments shall meet to discuss variances in methodology used for population projections and seek agreement on a population projection for the region to be used as a basis for determining the existing and projected housing need for the region. If no agreement is reached, then the population projection for the region shall be the population projection for the region prepared by the Department of Finance as may be modified by the department as a result of discussions with the council of governments.
(b)(1)At least 26 months prior to the scheduled revision pursuant to Section 65588 and prior to developing the existing and projected housing need for a region, the department shall meet and consult with the council of governments regarding the assumptions and methodology to be used by the department to determine the regions housing needs. The council of governments shall provide data assumptions from the councils projections, including, if available, the following data for the region:
(A)Anticipated household growth associated with projected population increases.
(B)Household size data and trends in household size.
(C)The percentage of households that are overcrowded. For purposes of this subparagraph, the term overcrowded means more than one resident per room in each room in a dwelling.
(D)The rate of household formation, or headship rates, based on age, gender, ethnicity, or other established demographic measures.
(E)The vacancy rates in existing housing stock, and the vacancy rates for healthy housing market functioning and regional mobility, as well as housing replacement needs.
(F)Other characteristics of the composition of the projected population.
(G)The relationship between jobs and housing, including any imbalance between jobs and housing.
(H)The loss of units during a state of emergency that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 8550) of Division 1 of Title 2), during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision pursuant to Section 65588 that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the data request.
(2)The department may accept or reject the information provided by the council of governments or modify its own assumptions or methodology based on this information. After consultation with the council of governments, the department shall make determinations in writing on the assumptions for each of the factors listed in subparagraphs (A) to (G), inclusive, of paragraph (1) and the methodology it shall use and shall provide these determinations to the council of governments.
(c)(1)After consultation with the council of governments, the department shall make a determination of the regions existing and projected housing need based upon the assumptions and methodology determined pursuant to subdivision (b). The regions existing and projected housing need shall reflect the achievement of a feasible balance between jobs and housing within the region using the regional employment projections in the applicable regional transportation plan. Within 30 days following notice of the determination from the department, the council of governments may file an objection to the departments determination of the regions existing and projected housing need with the department.
(2)The objection shall be based on and substantiate either of the following:
(A)The department failed to base its determination on the population projection for the region established pursuant to subdivision (a), and shall identify the population projection which the council of governments believes should instead be used for the determination and explain the basis for its rationale.
(B)The regional housing need determined by the department is not a reasonable application of the methodology and assumptions determined pursuant to subdivision (b). The objection shall include a proposed alternative determination of its regional housing need based upon the determinations made in subdivision (b), including analysis of why the proposed alternative would be a more reasonable application of the methodology and assumptions determined pursuant to subdivision (b).
(3)If a council of governments files an objection pursuant to this subdivision and includes with the objection a proposed alternative determination of its regional housing need, it shall also include documentation of its basis for the alternative determination. Within 45 days of receiving an objection filed pursuant to this section, the department shall consider the objection and make a final written determination of the regions existing and projected housing need that includes an explanation of the information upon which the determination was made.
(d)Statutory changes enacted after the date the department issued a final determination pursuant to this section shall not be a basis for a revision of the final determination.
SEC. 2.5.Section 65584.01 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.01.For the fourth and subsequent revision of the housing element pursuant to Section 65588, the department, in consultation with each council of governments, where applicable, shall determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region in the following manner:
(a)The departments determination shall be based upon population projections produced by the Department of Finance and regional population forecasts used in preparing regional transportation plans, in consultation with each council of governments. If the total regional population forecast for the projection year, developed by the council of governments and used for the preparation of the regional transportation plan, is within a range of 1.5 percent of the total regional population forecast for the projection year by the Department of Finance, then the population forecast developed by the council of governments shall be the basis from which the department determines the existing and projected need for housing in the region. If the difference between the total population projected by the council of governments and the total population projected for the region by the Department of Finance is greater than 1.5 percent, then the department and the council of governments shall meet to discuss variances in methodology used for population projections and seek agreement on a population projection for the region to be used as a basis for determining the existing and projected housing need for the region. If no agreement is reached, then the population projection for the region shall be the population projection for the region prepared by the Department of Finance as may be modified by the department as a result of discussions with the council of governments.
(b)(1)At least 26 months prior to the scheduled revision pursuant to Section 65588 and prior to developing the existing and projected housing need for a region, the department shall meet and consult with the council of governments regarding the assumptions and methodology to be used by the department to determine the regions housing needs. The council of governments shall provide data assumptions from the councils projections, including, if available, the following data for the region:
(A)Anticipated household growth associated with projected population increases.
(B)Household size data and trends in household size.
(C)The percentage of households that are overcrowded and the overcrowding rate for a comparable housing market. For purposes of this subparagraph:
(i)The term overcrowded means more than one resident per room in each room in a dwelling.
(ii)The term overcrowded rate for a comparable housing market means that the overcrowding rate is no more than the average overcrowding rate in comparable regions throughout the nation, as determined by the council of governments.
(D)The rate of household formation, or headship rates, based on age, gender, ethnicity, or other established demographic measures.
(E)The vacancy rates in existing housing stock, and the vacancy rates for healthy housing market functioning and regional mobility, as well as housing replacement needs. For purposes of this subparagraph, the vacancy rate for a healthy rental housing market shall be considered no less than 5 percent.
(F)Other characteristics of the composition of the projected population.
(G)The relationship between jobs and housing, including any imbalance between jobs and housing.
(H)The percentage of households that are cost burdened and the rate of housing cost burden for a healthy housing market. For the purposes of this subparagraph:
(i)The term cost burdened means the share of very low-, low-, moderate-, and above moderate-income households that are paying more than 30 percent of household income on housing costs.
(ii)The term rate of housing cost burden for a healthy housing market means that the rate of households that are cost burdened is no more than the average rate of households that are cost burdened in comparable regions throughout the nation, as determined by the council of governments.
(I)The loss of units during a state of emergency that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 8550) of Division 1 of Title 2), during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision pursuant to Section 65588 that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the data request.
(2)The department may accept or reject the information provided by the council of governments or modify its own assumptions or methodology based on this information. After consultation with the council of governments, the department shall make determinations in writing on the assumptions for each of the factors listed in subparagraphs (A) to (I), inclusive, of paragraph (1) and the methodology it shall use and shall provide these determinations to the council of governments. The methodology submitted by the department may make adjustments based on the regions total projected households, which includes existing households as well as projected households.
(c)(1)After consultation with the council of governments, the department shall make a determination of the regions existing and projected housing need based upon the assumptions and methodology determined pursuant to subdivision (b). The regions existing and projected housing need shall reflect the achievement of a feasible balance between jobs and housing within the region using the regional employment projections in the applicable regional transportation plan. Within 30 days following notice of the determination from the department, the council of governments may file an objection to the departments determination of the regions existing and projected housing need with the department.
(2)The objection shall be based on and substantiate either of the following:
(A)The department failed to base its determination on the population projection for the region established pursuant to subdivision (a), and shall identify the population projection which the council of governments believes should instead be used for the determination and explain the basis for its rationale.
(B)The regional housing need determined by the department is not a reasonable application of the methodology and assumptions determined pursuant to subdivision (b). The objection shall include a proposed alternative determination of its regional housing need based upon the determinations made in subdivision (b), including analysis of why the proposed alternative would be a more reasonable application of the methodology and assumptions determined pursuant to subdivision (b).
(3)If a council of governments files an objection pursuant to this subdivision and includes with the objection a proposed alternative determination of its regional housing need, it shall also include documentation of its basis for the alternative determination. Within 45 days of receiving an objection filed pursuant to this section, the department shall consider the objection and make a final written determination of the regions existing and projected housing need that includes an explanation of the information upon which the determination was made.
(d)Statutory changes enacted after the date the department issued a final determination pursuant to this section shall not be a basis for a revision of the final determination.
SEC. 3.Section 65584.04 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.04.(a)At least two years prior to a scheduled revision required by Section 65588, each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall develop, in consultation with the department, a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or within the subregion, where applicable pursuant to this section. The methodology shall further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(b)(1)No more than six months prior to the development of a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected housing need, each council of governments shall survey each of its member jurisdictions to request, at a minimum, information regarding the factors listed in subdivision (e) that will allow the development of a methodology based upon the factors established in subdivision (e).
(2)With respect to the objective in paragraph (5) of subdivision (d) of Section 65584, the survey shall review and compile information that will allow the development of a methodology based upon the issues, strategies, and actions that are included, as available, in an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice or an Assessment of Fair Housing completed by any city or county or the department that covers communities within the area served by the council of governments, and in housing elements adopted pursuant to this article by cities and counties within the area served by the council of governments.
(3)The council of governments shall seek to obtain the information in a manner and format that is comparable throughout the region and utilize readily available data to the extent possible.
(4)The information provided by a local government pursuant to this section shall be used, to the extent possible, by the council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, as source information for the methodology developed pursuant to this section. The survey shall state that none of the information received may be used as a basis for reducing the total housing need established for the region pursuant to Section 65584.01.
(5)If the council of governments fails to conduct a survey pursuant to this subdivision, a city, county, or city and county may submit information related to the items listed in subdivision (e) prior to the public comment period provided for in subdivision (d).
(c)The council of governments shall electronically report the results of the survey of fair housing issues, strategies, and actions compiled pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b). The report shall describe common themes and effective strategies employed by cities and counties within the area served by the council of governments, including common themes and effective strategies around avoiding the displacement of lower-income households. The council of governments shall also identify significant barriers to affirmatively furthering fair housing at the regional level and may recommend strategies or actions to overcome those barriers. A council of governments or metropolitan planning organization, as appropriate, may use this information for any other purpose, including publication within a regional transportation plan adopted pursuant to Section 65080 or to inform the land use assumptions that are applied in the development of a regional transportation plan.
(d)Public participation and access shall be required in the development of the methodology and in the process of drafting and adoption of the allocation of the regional housing needs. Participation by organizations other than local jurisdictions and councils of governments shall be solicited in a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community as well as members of protected classes under Section 12955. The proposed methodology, along with any relevant underlying data and assumptions, an explanation of how information about local government conditions gathered pursuant to subdivision (b) has been used to develop the proposed methodology, how each of the factors listed in subdivision (e) is incorporated into the methodology, and how the proposed methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (e) of Section 65584, shall be distributed to all cities, counties, any subregions, and members of the public who have made a written or electronic request for the proposed methodology and published on the council of governments, or delegate subregions, Internet Web site. The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall conduct at least one public hearing to receive oral and written comments on the proposed methodology.
(e)To the extent that sufficient data is available from local governments pursuant to subdivision (b) or other sources, each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall include the following factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs:
(1)Each member jurisdictions existing and projected jobs and housing relationship. This shall include an estimate, based on readily available data, of the number of low-wage jobs within the jurisdiction and how many housing units within the jurisdiction are affordable to low-wage workers as well as an estimate, based on readily available data, of projected job growth and projected household growth by income level within each member jurisdiction during the planning period.
(2)The opportunities and constraints to development of additional housing in each member jurisdiction, including all of the following:
(A)Lack of capacity for sewer or water service due to federal or state laws, regulations or regulatory actions, or supply and distribution decisions made by a sewer or water service provider other than the local jurisdiction that preclude the jurisdiction from providing necessary infrastructure for additional development during the planning period.
(B)The availability of land suitable for urban development or for conversion to residential use, the availability of underutilized land, and opportunities for infill development and increased residential densities. The council of governments may not limit its consideration of suitable housing sites or land suitable for urban development to existing zoning ordinances and land use restrictions of a locality, but shall consider the potential for increased residential development under alternative zoning ordinances and land use restrictions. The determination of available land suitable for urban development may exclude lands where the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or the Department of Water Resources has determined that the flood management infrastructure designed to protect that land is not adequate to avoid the risk of flooding.
(C)Lands preserved or protected from urban development under existing federal or state programs, or both, designed to protect open space, farmland, environmental habitats, and natural resources on a long-term basis.
(D)County policies to preserve prime agricultural land, as defined pursuant to Section 56064, within an unincorporated area, and land within an unincorporated area zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation that is subject to a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of that jurisdiction that prohibits or restricts its conversion to non-agricultural uses.
(3)The distribution of household growth assumed for purposes of a comparable period of regional transportation plans and opportunities to maximize the use of public transportation and existing transportation infrastructure.
(4)Agreements between a county and cities in a county to direct growth toward incorporated areas of the county.
(5)The loss of units contained in assisted housing developments, as defined in paragraph (9) of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, that changed to non-low-income use through mortgage prepayment, subsidy contract expirations, or termination of use restrictions.
(6)The percentage of existing households at each of the income levels listed in subdivision (e) of Section 65584 that are paying more than 30 percent and more than 50 percent of their income in rent.
(7)The rate of overcrowding.
(8)The housing needs of farmworkers.
(9)The housing needs generated by the presence of a private university or a campus of the California State University or the University of California within any member jurisdiction.
(10)The loss of units during a state of emergency that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 8550) of Division 1 of Title 2), during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision pursuant to Section 65588 that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the analysis.
(11)The regions greenhouse gas emissions targets provided by the Air Resources Board pursuant to Section 65080.
(12)Any other factors adopted by the council of governments, that further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584, provided that the council of governments specifies which of the objectives each additional factor is necessary to further. The council of governments may include additional factors unrelated to furthering the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 so long as the additional factors do not undermine the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 and are applied equally across all household income levels as described in subdivision (f) of Section 65584 and the council of governments makes a finding that the factor is necessary to address significant health and safety conditions.
(f)The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall explain in writing how each of the factors described in subdivision (e) was incorporated into the methodology and how the methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. The methodology may include numerical weighting. This information and any other supporting materials used in determining the methodology, shall be posted on the council of governments, or delegate subregions, Internet Web site.
(g)Any ordinance, policy, voter-approved measure, or standard of a city or county that directly or indirectly limits the number of residential building permits issued by a city or county shall not be a justification for a determination or a reduction in the share of a city or county of the regional housing need.
(h)Following the conclusion of the public comment period described in subdivision (c) on the proposed allocation methodology, and after making any revisions deemed appropriate by the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, as a result of comments received during the public comment period, and as a result of consultation with the department, each council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall publish a draft allocation methodology on its Internet Web site and submit the draft allocation methodology, along with the information required pursuant to subdivision (f), to the department.
(i)Within 60 days, the department shall review the draft allocation methodology and report its written findings to the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable. In its written findings the department shall determine whether the methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. If the department determines that the methodology does not further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584, the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall consider the findings made by the department and take one of the following actions:
(1)Revise the methodology to further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 and adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology.
(2)Adopt the regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology without revisions and include within its resolution of adoption written findings, supported by substantial evidence, as to why the council of governments, or delegate subregion, believes that the methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 despite the findings of the department.
(j)If the departments findings are not available within the time limits set by subdivision (i), the council of governments, or delegate subregion, may act without them.
(k)Upon either action pursuant to subdivision (i), the council of governments, or delegate subregion, shall provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, or delegate subregion, as applicable, and to the department, and shall publish the adopted allocation methodology, along with its resolution and any adopted written findings, on its Internet Web site.
(l)The department may, within 90 days, review the adopted methodology and report its findings to the council of governments, or delegate subregion.
(m)(1)It is the intent of the Legislature that housing planning be coordinated and integrated with the regional transportation plan. To achieve this goal, the allocation plan shall allocate housing units within the region consistent with the development pattern included in the sustainable communities strategy.
(2)The final allocation plan shall ensure that the total regional housing need, by income category, as determined under Section 65584, is maintained, and that each jurisdiction in the region receive an allocation of units for low- and very low income households.
(3)The resolution approving the final housing need allocation plan shall demonstrate that the plan is consistent with the sustainable communities strategy in the regional transportation plan and furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
SEC. 3.5.Section 65584.04 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.04.(a)At least two years prior to a scheduled revision required by Section 65588, each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall develop, in consultation with the department, a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or within the subregion, where applicable pursuant to this section. The methodology shall further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(b)(1)No more than six months prior to the development of a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected housing need, each council of governments shall survey each of its member jurisdictions to request, at a minimum, information regarding the factors listed in subdivision (e) that will allow the development of a methodology based upon the factors established in subdivision (e).
(2)With respect to the objective in paragraph (5) of subdivision (d) of Section 65584, the survey shall review and compile information that will allow the development of a methodology based upon the issues, strategies, and actions that are included, as available, in an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice or an Assessment of Fair Housing completed by any city or county or the department that covers communities within the area served by the council of governments, and in housing elements adopted pursuant to this article by cities and counties within the area served by the council of governments.
(3)The council of governments shall seek to obtain the information in a manner and format that is comparable throughout the region and utilize readily available data to the extent possible.
(4)The information provided by a local government pursuant to this section shall be used, to the extent possible, by the council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, as source information for the methodology developed pursuant to this section. The survey shall state that none of the information received may be used as a basis for reducing the total housing need established for the region pursuant to Section 65584.01.
(5)If the council of governments fails to conduct a survey pursuant to this subdivision, a city, county, or city and county may submit information related to the items listed in subdivision (e) prior to the public comment period provided for in subdivision (d).
(c)The council of governments shall electronically report the results of the survey of fair housing issues, strategies, and actions compiled pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b). The report shall describe common themes and effective strategies employed by cities and counties within the area served by the council of governments, including common themes and effective strategies around avoiding the displacement of lower-income households. The council of governments shall also identify significant barriers to affirmatively furthering fair housing at the regional level and may recommend strategies or actions to overcome those barriers. A council of governments or metropolitan planning organization, as appropriate, may use this information for any other purpose, including publication within a regional transportation plan adopted pursuant to Section 65080 or to inform the land use assumptions that are applied in the development of a regional transportation plan.
(d)Public participation and access shall be required in the development of the methodology and in the process of drafting and adoption of the allocation of the regional housing needs. Participation by organizations other than local jurisdictions and councils of governments shall be solicited in a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community as well as members of protected classes under Section 12955. The proposed methodology, along with any relevant underlying data and assumptions, an explanation of how information about local government conditions gathered pursuant to subdivision (b) has been used to develop the proposed methodology, how each of the factors listed in subdivision (e) is incorporated into the methodology, and how the proposed methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (e) of Section 65584, shall be distributed to all cities, counties, any subregions, and members of the public who have made a written or electronic request for the proposed methodology and published on the council of governments, or delegate subregions, Internet Web site. The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall conduct at least one public hearing to receive oral and written comments on the proposed methodology.
(e)To the extent that sufficient data is available from local governments pursuant to subdivision (b) or other sources, each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall include the following factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs:
(1)Each member jurisdictions existing and projected jobs and housing relationship. This shall include an estimate, based on readily available data, of the number of low-wage jobs within the jurisdiction and how many housing units within the jurisdiction are affordable to low-wage workers, as well as an estimate based on readily available data, of projected job growth and projected household growth by income level within each member jurisdiction during the planning period.
(2)The opportunities and constraints to development of additional housing in each member jurisdiction, including all of the following:
(A)Lack of capacity for sewer or water service due to federal or state laws, regulations or regulatory actions, or supply and distribution decisions made by a sewer or water service provider other than the local jurisdiction that preclude the jurisdiction from providing necessary infrastructure for additional development during the planning period.
(B)The availability of land suitable for urban development or for conversion to residential use, the availability of underutilized land, and opportunities for infill development and increased residential densities. The council of governments may not limit its consideration of suitable housing sites or land suitable for urban development to existing zoning ordinances and land use restrictions of a locality, but shall consider the potential for increased residential development under alternative zoning ordinances and land use restrictions. The determination of available land suitable for urban development may exclude lands where the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or the Department of Water Resources has determined that the flood management infrastructure designed to protect that land is not adequate to avoid the risk of flooding.
(C)Lands preserved or protected from urban development under existing federal or state programs, or both, designed to protect open space, farmland, environmental habitats, and natural resources on a long-term basis, including land zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation that is subject to a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of that jurisdiction that prohibits or restricts conversion to non-agricultural uses.
(D)County policies to preserve prime agricultural land, as defined pursuant to Section 56064, within an unincorporated area, and land within an unincorporated area zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation that is subject to a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of that jurisdiction that prohibits or restricts its conversion to non-agricultural uses.
(3)The distribution of household growth assumed for purposes of a comparable period of regional transportation plans and opportunities to maximize the use of public transportation and existing transportation infrastructure.
(4)Agreements between a county and cities in a county to direct growth toward incorporated areas of the county, and land within an unincorporated area zoned or designated for agricultural protection or presentation that is subject to a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of the jurisdiction that prohibits or restricts conversion to nonagricultural uses.
(5)The loss of units contained in assisted housing developments, as defined in paragraph (9) of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, that changed to non-low-income use through mortgage prepayment, subsidy contract expirations, or termination of use restrictions.
(6)The percentage of existing households at each of the income levels listed in subdivision (e) of Section 65584 that are paying more than 30 percent and more than 50 percent of their income in rent.
(7)The rate of overcrowding.
(8)The housing needs of farmworkers.
(9)The housing needs generated by the presence of a private university or a campus of the California State University or the University of California within any member jurisdiction.
(10)The loss of units during a state of emergency that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 8550) of Division 1 of Title 2), during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision pursuant to Section 65588 that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the analysis.
(11)The regions greenhouse gas emissions targets provided by the State Air Resources Board pursuant to Section 65080.
(12)Any other factors adopted by the council of governments, that further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584, provided that the council of governments specifies which of the objectives each additional factor is necessary to further. The council of governments may include additional factors unrelated to furthering the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 so long as the additional factors do not undermine the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 and are applied equally across all household income levels as described in subdivision (f) of Section 65584 and the council of governments makes a finding that the factor is necessary to address significant health and safety conditions.
(f)The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall explain in writing how each of the factors described in subdivision (e) was incorporated into the methodology and how the methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. The methodology may include numerical weighting. This information and any other supporting materials used in determining the methodology, shall be posted on the council of governments, or delegate subregions, Internet Web site.
(g)The following criteria shall not be a justification for a determination or a reduction in a jurisdictions share of the regional housing need:
(1)Any ordinance, policy, voter-approved measure, or standard of a city or county that directly or indirectly limits the number of residential building permits issued by a city or county.
(2)Prior underproduction of housing in a city or county from the previous regional housing need allocation, as determined by each jurisdictions annual production report submitted pursuant to subparagraph (H) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 65400.
(3)Stable population numbers in a city or county from the previous regional housing needs cycle.
(h)Following the conclusion of the public comment period described in subdivision (d) on the proposed allocation methodology, and after making any revisions deemed appropriate by the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, as a result of comments received during the public comment period, and as a result of consultation with the department, each council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall publish a draft allocation methodology on its Internet Web site and submit the draft allocation methodology, along with the information required pursuant to subdivision (e), to the department.
(i)Within 60 days, the department shall review the draft allocation methodology and report its written findings to the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable. In its written findings the department shall determine whether the methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. If the department determines that the methodology is not consistent with subdivision (d) of Section 65584, the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall take one of the following actions:
(1)Revise the methodology to further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 and adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology.
(2)Adopt the regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology without revisions and include within its resolution of adoption findings, supported by substantial evidence, as to why the council of governments, or delegate subregion, believes that the methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 despite the findings of the department.
(j)If the departments findings are not available within the time limits set by subdivision (i), the council of governments, or delegate subregion, may act without them.
(k)Upon either action pursuant to subdivision (i), the council of governments, or delegate subregion, shall provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, or delegate subregion, as applicable, and to the department, and shall publish the adopted allocation methodology, along with its resolution and any adopted written findings, on its Internet Web site.
(l)The department may, within 90 days, review the adopted methodology and report its findings to the council of governments, or delegate subregion.
(m)(1)It is the intent of the Legislature that housing planning be coordinated and integrated with the regional transportation plan. To achieve this goal, the allocation plan shall allocate housing units within the region consistent with the development pattern included in the sustainable communities strategy.
(2)The final allocation plan shall ensure that the total regional housing need, by income category, as determined under Section 65584, is maintained, and that each jurisdiction in the region receive an allocation of units for low- and very low income households.
(3)The resolution approving the final housing need allocation plan shall demonstrate that the plan is consistent with the sustainable communities strategy in the regional transportation plan and furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
SEC. 4.Section 65584.05 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.05.(a)At least one and one-half years prior to the scheduled revision required by Section 65588, each council of governments and delegate subregion, as applicable, shall distribute a draft allocation of regional housing needs to each local government in the region or subregion, where applicable, and the department, based on the methodology adopted pursuant to Section 65584.04 and shall publish the draft allocation on its Internet Web site. The draft allocation shall include the underlying data and methodology on which the allocation is based, and a statement as to how it furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. It is the intent of the Legislature that the draft allocation should be distributed prior to the completion of the update of the applicable regional transportation plan. The draft allocation shall distribute to localities and subregions, if any, within the region the entire regional housing need determined pursuant to Section 65584.01 or within subregions, as applicable, the subregions entire share of the regional housing need determined pursuant to Section 65584.03.
(b)Within 45 days following receipt of the draft allocation, a local government within the region or the delegate subregion, as applicable, or the department may appeal to the council of governments or the delegate subregion for a revision of the share of the regional housing need proposed to be allocated to one or more local governments. Appeals shall be based upon comparable data available for all affected jurisdictions and accepted planning methodology, and supported by adequate documentation, and shall include a statement as to why the revision is necessary to further the intent of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. An appeal pursuant to this subdivision shall be consistent with, and not to the detriment of, the development pattern in an applicable sustainable communities strategy developed pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 65080. Appeals shall be limited to any of the following circumstances:
(1)The council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, failed to adequately consider the information submitted pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 65584.04.
(2)The council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, failed to determine the share of the regional housing need in accordance with the information described in, and the methodology established pursuant to, Section 65584.04, and in a manner that furthers, and does not undermine, the intent of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(3)A significant and unforeseen change in circumstances has occurred in the local jurisdiction or jurisdictions that merits a revision of the information submitted pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 65584.04. Appeals on this basis shall only be made by the jurisdiction or jurisdictions where the change in circumstances has occurred.
(c)At the close of the period for filing appeals pursuant to subdivision (b), the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall notify all other local governments within the region or delegate subregion and the department of all appeals and shall make all materials submitted in support of each appeal available on a publicly available Internet Web site. Local governments and the department may, within 45 days, comment on one or more appeals. If no appeals are filed, the draft allocation shall be issued as the proposed final allocation plan pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (e).
(d)No later than 30 days after the close of the comment period, and after providing all local governments within the region or delegate subregion, as applicable, at least 21 days prior notice, the council of governments or delegate subregion shall conduct one public hearing to consider all appeals filed pursuant to subdivision (b) and all comments received pursuant to subdivision (c).
(e)No later than 45 days after the public hearing pursuant to subdivision (d), the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall do both of the following:
(1)Make a final determination that either accepts, rejects, or modifies each appeal for a revised share filed pursuant to subdivision (b). Final determinations shall be based upon the information and methodology described in Section 65584.04 and whether the revision is necessary to further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. The final determination shall be in writing and shall include written findings as to how the determination is consistent with this article. The final determination on an appeal may require the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to adjust the share of the regional housing need allocated to one or more local governments that are not the subject of an appeal.
(2)Issue a proposed final allocation plan.
(f)In the proposed final allocation plan, the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall adjust allocations to local governments based upon the results of the appeals process. If the adjustments total 7 percent or less of the regional housing need determined pursuant to Section 65584.01, or, as applicable, total 7 percent or less of the subregions share of the regional housing need as determined pursuant to Section 65584.03, then the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall distribute the adjustments proportionally to all local governments. If the adjustments total more than 7 percent of the regional housing need, then the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall develop a methodology to distribute the amount greater than the 7 percent to local governments. In no event shall the total distribution of housing need equal less than the regional housing need, as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01, nor shall the subregional distribution of housing need equal less than its share of the regional housing need as determined pursuant to Section 65584.03.
(g)Within 45 days after the issuance of the proposed final allocation plan by the council of governments and each delegate subregion, as applicable, the council of governments shall hold a public hearing to adopt a final allocation plan. To the extent that the final allocation plan fully allocates the regional share of statewide housing need, as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01 and has taken into account all appeals, the council of governments shall have final authority to determine the distribution of the regions existing and projected housing need as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01. The council of governments shall submit its final allocation plan to the department within three days of adoption. Within 30 days after the departments receipt of the final allocation plan adopted by the council of governments, the department shall determine whether or not the final allocation plan is consistent with the existing and projected housing need for the region, as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01. The department may revise the determination of the council of governments if necessary to obtain this consistency.
(h)Any authority of the council of governments to review and revise the share of a city or county of the regional housing need under this section shall not constitute authority to revise, approve, or disapprove the manner in which the share of the city or county of the regional housing need is implemented through its housing program.
(i)Any time period in subdivision (d) or (e) may be extended by a council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, for up to 30 days.
SEC. 5.Section 65584.06 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.06.(a)For cities and counties without a council of governments, the department shall determine and distribute the existing and projected housing need, in accordance with Section 65584 and this section. If the department determines that a county or counties, supported by a resolution adopted by the board or boards of supervisors, and a majority of cities within the county or counties representing a majority of the population of the county or counties, possess the capability and resources and has agreed to accept the responsibility, with respect to its jurisdiction, for the distribution of the regional housing need, the department shall delegate this responsibility to the cities and county or counties.
(b)The distribution of regional housing need shall, based upon available data and in consultation with the cities and counties, take into consideration market demand for housing, the distribution of household growth within the county assumed in the regional transportation plan where applicable, employment opportunities and commuting patterns, the availability of suitable sites and public facilities, agreements between a county and cities in a county to direct growth toward incorporated areas of the county, or other considerations as may be requested by the affected cities or counties and agreed to by the department. As part of the allocation of the regional housing need, the department shall provide each city and county with data describing the assumptions and methodology used in calculating its share of the regional housing need. Consideration of suitable housing sites or land suitable for urban development is not limited to existing zoning ordinances and land use restrictions of a locality, but shall include consideration of the potential for increased residential development under alternative zoning ordinances and land use restrictions. The determination of available land suitable for urban development may exclude lands where the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or the Department of Water Resources has determined that the flood management infrastructure designed to protect that land is not adequate to avoid the risk of flooding.
(c)Within 90 days following the departments determination of a draft distribution of the regional housing need to the cities and the county, a city or county may propose to revise the determination of its share of the regional housing need in accordance with criteria set forth in the draft distribution. The proposed revised share shall be based upon comparable data available for all affected jurisdictions, and accepted planning methodology, and shall be supported by adequate documentation.
(d)(1)Within 60 days after the end of the 90-day time period for the revision by the cities or county, the department shall accept the proposed revision, modify its earlier determination, or indicate why the proposed revision is inconsistent with the regional housing need.
(2)If the department does not accept the proposed revision, then, within 30 days, the city or county may request a public hearing to review the determination.
(3)The city or county shall be notified within 30 days by certified mail, return receipt requested, of at least one public hearing regarding the determination.
(4)The date of the hearing shall be at least 10 but not more than 15 days from the date of the notification.
(5)Before making its final determination, the department shall consider all comments received and shall include a written response to each request for revision received from a city or county.
(e)If the department accepts the proposed revision or modifies its earlier determination, the city or county shall use that share. If the department grants a revised allocation pursuant to subdivision (d), the department shall ensure that the total regional housing need is maintained. The departments final determination shall be in writing and shall include information explaining how its action is consistent with this section. If the department indicates that the proposed revision is inconsistent with the regional housing need, the city or county shall use the share that was originally determined by the department. The department, within its final determination, may adjust the allocation of a city or county that was not the subject of a request for revision of the draft distribution.
(f)The department shall issue a final regional housing need allocation for all cities and counties within 45 days of the completion of the local review period.
(g)Statutory changes enacted after the date the department issued a final determination pursuant to this section shall not be a basis for a revision of the final determination.
SEC. 6.Nothing in this act shall be read to change a jurisdictions obligations, discretion, or flexibility under existing law related to the preparation and adoption of a housing element, nor shall it be read to compel a jurisdiction to take any one particular action that is not already required by law or prohibit a jurisdiction from taking any one particular action that is not already prohibited by law in implementing a housing element.
SEC. 7.(a)Section 1.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 65584 of the Government Code proposed by both this bill and Senate Bill 828. That section in this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2019, (2) each bill amends Section 65584 of the Government Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 828, in which case Section 1 of this bill shall not become operative.
(b)Section 2.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 65584.01 of the Government Code proposed by both this bill and Senate Bill 828. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2019, (2) each bill amends Section 65584.01 of the Government Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 828, in which case Section 2 of this bill shall not become operative.
(c)(1)Section 3.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 65584.04 of the Government Code proposed by both this bill and Senate Bill 828. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2019, (2) each bill amends Section 65584.04 of the Government Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 828, in which case Section 3 of this bill shall not become operative.
SEC. 8.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
(a)(1)For the fourth and subsequent revisions of the housing element pursuant to Section 65588, the department shall determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region pursuant to this article. For purposes of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, the share of a city or county of the regional housing need shall include that share of the housing need of persons at all income levels within the area significantly affected by the general plan of the city or county.
(2)While it is the intent of the Legislature that cities, counties, and cities and counties should undertake all necessary actions to encourage, promote, and facilitate the development of housing to accommodate the entire regional housing need, it is recognized, however, that future housing production may not equal the regional housing need established for planning purposes.
(3)The Legislature finds and declares that insufficient housing in job centers hinders the states environmental quality and runs counter to the states environmental goals. In particular, when Californians seeking affordable housing are forced to drive longer distances to work, an increased amount of greenhouse gases and other pollutants is released and puts in jeopardy the achievement of the states climate goals, as established pursuant to Section 38566 of the Health and Safety Code, and clean air goals.
(b)The department, in consultation with each council of governments, shall determine each regions existing and projected housing need pursuant to Section 65584.01 at least two years prior to the scheduled revision required pursuant to Section 65588. The appropriate council of governments, or for cities and counties without a council of governments, the department, shall adopt a final regional housing need plan that allocates a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county at least one year prior to the scheduled revision for the region required by Section 65588. The allocation plan prepared by a council of governments shall be prepared pursuant to Sections 65584.04 and 65584.05.
(c)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the due dates for the determinations of the department or for the council of governments, respectively, regarding the regional housing need may be extended by the department by not more than 60 days if the extension will enable access to more recent critical population or housing data from a pending or recent release of the United States Census Bureau or the Department of Finance. If the due date for the determination of the department or the council of governments is extended for this reason, the department shall extend the corresponding housing element revision deadline pursuant to Section 65588 by not more than 60 days.
(d)The regional housing needs allocation plan shall further all of the following objectives:
(1)Increasing the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner, which shall result in each jurisdiction receiving an allocation of units for low- and very low income households.
(2)Promoting infill development and socioeconomic equity, the protection of environmental and agricultural resources, the encouragement of efficient development patterns, and the achievement of the regions greenhouse gas reductions targets provided by the Air Resources Board pursuant to Section 65080.
(3)Promoting an improved intraregional relationship between jobs and housing, including an improved balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction.
(4)Allocating a lower proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately high share of households in that income category, as compared to the countywide distribution of households in that category from the most recent American Community Survey.
(5)Affirmatively furthering fair housing.
(e)For purposes of this section, affirmatively furthering fair housing means taking meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics. Specifically, affirmatively furthering fair housing means taking meaningful actions that, taken together, address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity, replacing segregated living patterns with truly integrated and balanced living patterns, transforming racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity, and fostering and maintaining compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws.
(f)For purposes of this section, household income levels are as determined by the department as of the most recent American Community Survey to the following code sections:
(1)Very low incomes as defined by Section 50105 of the Health and Safety Code.
(2)Lower incomes, as defined by Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
(3)Moderate incomes, as defined by Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(4)Above moderate incomes are those exceeding the moderate-income level of Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(g)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, determinations made by the department, a council of governments, or a city or county pursuant to this section or Section 65584.01, 65584.02, 65584.03, 65584.04, 65584.05, 65584.06, 65584.07, or 65584.08 are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code).
SEC. 1.5.Section 65584 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.(a)(1)For the fourth and subsequent revisions of the housing element pursuant to Section 65588, the department shall determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region pursuant to this article. For purposes of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, the share of a city or county of the regional housing need shall include that share of the housing need of persons at all income levels within the area significantly affected by the general plan of the city or county.
(2)It is the intent of the Legislature that cities, counties, and cities and counties should undertake all necessary actions to encourage, promote, and facilitate the development of housing to accommodate the entire regional housing need, and reasonable actions should be taken by local and regional governments to ensure that future housing production meets, at a minimum, the regional housing need established for planning purposes. These actions shall include applicable reforms and incentives in Section 65582.1.
(3)The Legislature finds and declares that insufficient housing in job centers hinders the states environmental quality and runs counter to the states environmental goals. In particular, when Californians seeking affordable housing are forced to drive longer distances to work, an increased amount of greenhouse gases and other pollutants is released and puts in jeopardy the achievement of the states climate goals, as established pursuant to Section 38566 of the Health and Safety Code, and clean air goals.
(b)The department, in consultation with each council of governments, shall determine each regions existing and projected housing need pursuant to Section 65584.01 at least two years prior to the scheduled revision required pursuant to Section 65588. The appropriate council of governments, or for cities and counties without a council of governments, the department, shall adopt a final regional housing need plan that allocates a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county at least one year prior to the scheduled revision for the region required by Section 65588. The allocation plan prepared by a council of governments shall be prepared pursuant to Sections 65584.04 and 65584.05.
(c)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the due dates for the determinations of the department or for the council of governments, respectively, regarding the regional housing need may be extended by the department by not more than 60 days if the extension will enable access to more recent critical population or housing data from a pending or recent release of the United States Census Bureau or the Department of Finance. If the due date for the determination of the department or the council of governments is extended for this reason, the department shall extend the corresponding housing element revision deadline pursuant to Section 65588 by not more than 60 days.
(d)The regional housing needs allocation plan shall further all of the following objectives:
(1)Increasing the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner, which shall result in each jurisdiction receiving an allocation of units for low- and very low income households.
(2)Promoting infill development and socioeconomic equity, the protection of environmental and agricultural resources, the encouragement of efficient development patterns, and the achievement of the regions greenhouse gas reductions targets provided by the State Air Resources Board pursuant to Section 65080.
(3)Promoting an improved intraregional relationship between jobs and housing, including an improved balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction.
(4)Allocating a lower proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately high share of households in that income category, as compared to the countywide distribution of households in that category from the most recent American Community Survey.
(5)Affirmatively furthering fair housing.
(e)For purposes of this section, affirmatively furthering fair housing means taking meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics. Specifically, affirmatively furthering fair housing means taking meaningful actions that, taken together, address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity, replacing segregated living patterns with truly integrated and balanced living patterns, transforming racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity, and fostering and maintaining compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws.
(f)For purposes of this section, household income levels are as determined by the department as of the most recent American Community Survey pursuant to the following code sections:
(1)Very low incomes as defined by Section 50105 of the Health and Safety Code.
(2)Lower incomes, as defined by Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
(3)Moderate incomes, as defined by Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(4)Above moderate incomes are those exceeding the moderate-income level of Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(g)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, determinations made by the department, a council of governments, or a city or county pursuant to this section or Section 65584.01, 65584.02, 65584.03, 65584.04, 65584.05, 65584.06, 65584.07, or 65584.08 are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code).
SEC. 2.Section 65584.01 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.01.For the fourth and subsequent revision of the housing element pursuant to Section 65588, the department, in consultation with each council of governments, where applicable, shall determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region in the following manner:
(a)The departments determination shall be based upon population projections produced by the Department of Finance and regional population forecasts used in preparing regional transportation plans, in consultation with each council of governments. If the total regional population forecast for the projection year, developed by the council of governments and used for the preparation of the regional transportation plan, is within a range of 1.5 percent of the total regional population forecast for the projection year by the Department of Finance, then the population forecast developed by the council of governments shall be the basis from which the department determines the existing and projected need for housing in the region. If the difference between the total population projected by the council of governments and the total population projected for the region by the Department of Finance is greater than 1.5 percent, then the department and the council of governments shall meet to discuss variances in methodology used for population projections and seek agreement on a population projection for the region to be used as a basis for determining the existing and projected housing need for the region. If no agreement is reached, then the population projection for the region shall be the population projection for the region prepared by the Department of Finance as may be modified by the department as a result of discussions with the council of governments.
(b)(1)At least 26 months prior to the scheduled revision pursuant to Section 65588 and prior to developing the existing and projected housing need for a region, the department shall meet and consult with the council of governments regarding the assumptions and methodology to be used by the department to determine the regions housing needs. The council of governments shall provide data assumptions from the councils projections, including, if available, the following data for the region:
(A)Anticipated household growth associated with projected population increases.
(B)Household size data and trends in household size.
(C)The percentage of households that are overcrowded. For purposes of this subparagraph, the term overcrowded means more than one resident per room in each room in a dwelling.
(D)The rate of household formation, or headship rates, based on age, gender, ethnicity, or other established demographic measures.
(E)The vacancy rates in existing housing stock, and the vacancy rates for healthy housing market functioning and regional mobility, as well as housing replacement needs.
(F)Other characteristics of the composition of the projected population.
(G)The relationship between jobs and housing, including any imbalance between jobs and housing.
(H)The loss of units during a state of emergency that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 8550) of Division 1 of Title 2), during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision pursuant to Section 65588 that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the data request.
(2)The department may accept or reject the information provided by the council of governments or modify its own assumptions or methodology based on this information. After consultation with the council of governments, the department shall make determinations in writing on the assumptions for each of the factors listed in subparagraphs (A) to (G), inclusive, of paragraph (1) and the methodology it shall use and shall provide these determinations to the council of governments.
(c)(1)After consultation with the council of governments, the department shall make a determination of the regions existing and projected housing need based upon the assumptions and methodology determined pursuant to subdivision (b). The regions existing and projected housing need shall reflect the achievement of a feasible balance between jobs and housing within the region using the regional employment projections in the applicable regional transportation plan. Within 30 days following notice of the determination from the department, the council of governments may file an objection to the departments determination of the regions existing and projected housing need with the department.
(2)The objection shall be based on and substantiate either of the following:
(A)The department failed to base its determination on the population projection for the region established pursuant to subdivision (a), and shall identify the population projection which the council of governments believes should instead be used for the determination and explain the basis for its rationale.
(B)The regional housing need determined by the department is not a reasonable application of the methodology and assumptions determined pursuant to subdivision (b). The objection shall include a proposed alternative determination of its regional housing need based upon the determinations made in subdivision (b), including analysis of why the proposed alternative would be a more reasonable application of the methodology and assumptions determined pursuant to subdivision (b).
(3)If a council of governments files an objection pursuant to this subdivision and includes with the objection a proposed alternative determination of its regional housing need, it shall also include documentation of its basis for the alternative determination. Within 45 days of receiving an objection filed pursuant to this section, the department shall consider the objection and make a final written determination of the regions existing and projected housing need that includes an explanation of the information upon which the determination was made.
(d)Statutory changes enacted after the date the department issued a final determination pursuant to this section shall not be a basis for a revision of the final determination.
SEC. 2.5.Section 65584.01 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.01.For the fourth and subsequent revision of the housing element pursuant to Section 65588, the department, in consultation with each council of governments, where applicable, shall determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region in the following manner:
(a)The departments determination shall be based upon population projections produced by the Department of Finance and regional population forecasts used in preparing regional transportation plans, in consultation with each council of governments. If the total regional population forecast for the projection year, developed by the council of governments and used for the preparation of the regional transportation plan, is within a range of 1.5 percent of the total regional population forecast for the projection year by the Department of Finance, then the population forecast developed by the council of governments shall be the basis from which the department determines the existing and projected need for housing in the region. If the difference between the total population projected by the council of governments and the total population projected for the region by the Department of Finance is greater than 1.5 percent, then the department and the council of governments shall meet to discuss variances in methodology used for population projections and seek agreement on a population projection for the region to be used as a basis for determining the existing and projected housing need for the region. If no agreement is reached, then the population projection for the region shall be the population projection for the region prepared by the Department of Finance as may be modified by the department as a result of discussions with the council of governments.
(b)(1)At least 26 months prior to the scheduled revision pursuant to Section 65588 and prior to developing the existing and projected housing need for a region, the department shall meet and consult with the council of governments regarding the assumptions and methodology to be used by the department to determine the regions housing needs. The council of governments shall provide data assumptions from the councils projections, including, if available, the following data for the region:
(A)Anticipated household growth associated with projected population increases.
(B)Household size data and trends in household size.
(C)The percentage of households that are overcrowded and the overcrowding rate for a comparable housing market. For purposes of this subparagraph:
(i)The term overcrowded means more than one resident per room in each room in a dwelling.
(ii)The term overcrowded rate for a comparable housing market means that the overcrowding rate is no more than the average overcrowding rate in comparable regions throughout the nation, as determined by the council of governments.
(D)The rate of household formation, or headship rates, based on age, gender, ethnicity, or other established demographic measures.
(E)The vacancy rates in existing housing stock, and the vacancy rates for healthy housing market functioning and regional mobility, as well as housing replacement needs. For purposes of this subparagraph, the vacancy rate for a healthy rental housing market shall be considered no less than 5 percent.
(F)Other characteristics of the composition of the projected population.
(G)The relationship between jobs and housing, including any imbalance between jobs and housing.
(H)The percentage of households that are cost burdened and the rate of housing cost burden for a healthy housing market. For the purposes of this subparagraph:
(i)The term cost burdened means the share of very low-, low-, moderate-, and above moderate-income households that are paying more than 30 percent of household income on housing costs.
(ii)The term rate of housing cost burden for a healthy housing market means that the rate of households that are cost burdened is no more than the average rate of households that are cost burdened in comparable regions throughout the nation, as determined by the council of governments.
(I)The loss of units during a state of emergency that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 8550) of Division 1 of Title 2), during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision pursuant to Section 65588 that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the data request.
(2)The department may accept or reject the information provided by the council of governments or modify its own assumptions or methodology based on this information. After consultation with the council of governments, the department shall make determinations in writing on the assumptions for each of the factors listed in subparagraphs (A) to (I), inclusive, of paragraph (1) and the methodology it shall use and shall provide these determinations to the council of governments. The methodology submitted by the department may make adjustments based on the regions total projected households, which includes existing households as well as projected households.
(c)(1)After consultation with the council of governments, the department shall make a determination of the regions existing and projected housing need based upon the assumptions and methodology determined pursuant to subdivision (b). The regions existing and projected housing need shall reflect the achievement of a feasible balance between jobs and housing within the region using the regional employment projections in the applicable regional transportation plan. Within 30 days following notice of the determination from the department, the council of governments may file an objection to the departments determination of the regions existing and projected housing need with the department.
(2)The objection shall be based on and substantiate either of the following:
(A)The department failed to base its determination on the population projection for the region established pursuant to subdivision (a), and shall identify the population projection which the council of governments believes should instead be used for the determination and explain the basis for its rationale.
(B)The regional housing need determined by the department is not a reasonable application of the methodology and assumptions determined pursuant to subdivision (b). The objection shall include a proposed alternative determination of its regional housing need based upon the determinations made in subdivision (b), including analysis of why the proposed alternative would be a more reasonable application of the methodology and assumptions determined pursuant to subdivision (b).
(3)If a council of governments files an objection pursuant to this subdivision and includes with the objection a proposed alternative determination of its regional housing need, it shall also include documentation of its basis for the alternative determination. Within 45 days of receiving an objection filed pursuant to this section, the department shall consider the objection and make a final written determination of the regions existing and projected housing need that includes an explanation of the information upon which the determination was made.
(d)Statutory changes enacted after the date the department issued a final determination pursuant to this section shall not be a basis for a revision of the final determination.
SEC. 3.Section 65584.04 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.04.(a)At least two years prior to a scheduled revision required by Section 65588, each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall develop, in consultation with the department, a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or within the subregion, where applicable pursuant to this section. The methodology shall further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(b)(1)No more than six months prior to the development of a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected housing need, each council of governments shall survey each of its member jurisdictions to request, at a minimum, information regarding the factors listed in subdivision (e) that will allow the development of a methodology based upon the factors established in subdivision (e).
(2)With respect to the objective in paragraph (5) of subdivision (d) of Section 65584, the survey shall review and compile information that will allow the development of a methodology based upon the issues, strategies, and actions that are included, as available, in an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice or an Assessment of Fair Housing completed by any city or county or the department that covers communities within the area served by the council of governments, and in housing elements adopted pursuant to this article by cities and counties within the area served by the council of governments.
(3)The council of governments shall seek to obtain the information in a manner and format that is comparable throughout the region and utilize readily available data to the extent possible.
(4)The information provided by a local government pursuant to this section shall be used, to the extent possible, by the council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, as source information for the methodology developed pursuant to this section. The survey shall state that none of the information received may be used as a basis for reducing the total housing need established for the region pursuant to Section 65584.01.
(5)If the council of governments fails to conduct a survey pursuant to this subdivision, a city, county, or city and county may submit information related to the items listed in subdivision (e) prior to the public comment period provided for in subdivision (d).
(c)The council of governments shall electronically report the results of the survey of fair housing issues, strategies, and actions compiled pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b). The report shall describe common themes and effective strategies employed by cities and counties within the area served by the council of governments, including common themes and effective strategies around avoiding the displacement of lower-income households. The council of governments shall also identify significant barriers to affirmatively furthering fair housing at the regional level and may recommend strategies or actions to overcome those barriers. A council of governments or metropolitan planning organization, as appropriate, may use this information for any other purpose, including publication within a regional transportation plan adopted pursuant to Section 65080 or to inform the land use assumptions that are applied in the development of a regional transportation plan.
(d)Public participation and access shall be required in the development of the methodology and in the process of drafting and adoption of the allocation of the regional housing needs. Participation by organizations other than local jurisdictions and councils of governments shall be solicited in a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community as well as members of protected classes under Section 12955. The proposed methodology, along with any relevant underlying data and assumptions, an explanation of how information about local government conditions gathered pursuant to subdivision (b) has been used to develop the proposed methodology, how each of the factors listed in subdivision (e) is incorporated into the methodology, and how the proposed methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (e) of Section 65584, shall be distributed to all cities, counties, any subregions, and members of the public who have made a written or electronic request for the proposed methodology and published on the council of governments, or delegate subregions, Internet Web site. The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall conduct at least one public hearing to receive oral and written comments on the proposed methodology.
(e)To the extent that sufficient data is available from local governments pursuant to subdivision (b) or other sources, each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall include the following factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs:
(1)Each member jurisdictions existing and projected jobs and housing relationship. This shall include an estimate, based on readily available data, of the number of low-wage jobs within the jurisdiction and how many housing units within the jurisdiction are affordable to low-wage workers as well as an estimate, based on readily available data, of projected job growth and projected household growth by income level within each member jurisdiction during the planning period.
(2)The opportunities and constraints to development of additional housing in each member jurisdiction, including all of the following:
(A)Lack of capacity for sewer or water service due to federal or state laws, regulations or regulatory actions, or supply and distribution decisions made by a sewer or water service provider other than the local jurisdiction that preclude the jurisdiction from providing necessary infrastructure for additional development during the planning period.
(B)The availability of land suitable for urban development or for conversion to residential use, the availability of underutilized land, and opportunities for infill development and increased residential densities. The council of governments may not limit its consideration of suitable housing sites or land suitable for urban development to existing zoning ordinances and land use restrictions of a locality, but shall consider the potential for increased residential development under alternative zoning ordinances and land use restrictions. The determination of available land suitable for urban development may exclude lands where the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or the Department of Water Resources has determined that the flood management infrastructure designed to protect that land is not adequate to avoid the risk of flooding.
(C)Lands preserved or protected from urban development under existing federal or state programs, or both, designed to protect open space, farmland, environmental habitats, and natural resources on a long-term basis.
(D)County policies to preserve prime agricultural land, as defined pursuant to Section 56064, within an unincorporated area, and land within an unincorporated area zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation that is subject to a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of that jurisdiction that prohibits or restricts its conversion to non-agricultural uses.
(3)The distribution of household growth assumed for purposes of a comparable period of regional transportation plans and opportunities to maximize the use of public transportation and existing transportation infrastructure.
(4)Agreements between a county and cities in a county to direct growth toward incorporated areas of the county.
(5)The loss of units contained in assisted housing developments, as defined in paragraph (9) of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, that changed to non-low-income use through mortgage prepayment, subsidy contract expirations, or termination of use restrictions.
(6)The percentage of existing households at each of the income levels listed in subdivision (e) of Section 65584 that are paying more than 30 percent and more than 50 percent of their income in rent.
(7)The rate of overcrowding.
(8)The housing needs of farmworkers.
(9)The housing needs generated by the presence of a private university or a campus of the California State University or the University of California within any member jurisdiction.
(10)The loss of units during a state of emergency that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 8550) of Division 1 of Title 2), during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision pursuant to Section 65588 that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the analysis.
(11)The regions greenhouse gas emissions targets provided by the Air Resources Board pursuant to Section 65080.
(12)Any other factors adopted by the council of governments, that further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584, provided that the council of governments specifies which of the objectives each additional factor is necessary to further. The council of governments may include additional factors unrelated to furthering the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 so long as the additional factors do not undermine the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 and are applied equally across all household income levels as described in subdivision (f) of Section 65584 and the council of governments makes a finding that the factor is necessary to address significant health and safety conditions.
(f)The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall explain in writing how each of the factors described in subdivision (e) was incorporated into the methodology and how the methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. The methodology may include numerical weighting. This information and any other supporting materials used in determining the methodology, shall be posted on the council of governments, or delegate subregions, Internet Web site.
(g)Any ordinance, policy, voter-approved measure, or standard of a city or county that directly or indirectly limits the number of residential building permits issued by a city or county shall not be a justification for a determination or a reduction in the share of a city or county of the regional housing need.
(h)Following the conclusion of the public comment period described in subdivision (c) on the proposed allocation methodology, and after making any revisions deemed appropriate by the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, as a result of comments received during the public comment period, and as a result of consultation with the department, each council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall publish a draft allocation methodology on its Internet Web site and submit the draft allocation methodology, along with the information required pursuant to subdivision (f), to the department.
(i)Within 60 days, the department shall review the draft allocation methodology and report its written findings to the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable. In its written findings the department shall determine whether the methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. If the department determines that the methodology does not further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584, the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall consider the findings made by the department and take one of the following actions:
(1)Revise the methodology to further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 and adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology.
(2)Adopt the regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology without revisions and include within its resolution of adoption written findings, supported by substantial evidence, as to why the council of governments, or delegate subregion, believes that the methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 despite the findings of the department.
(j)If the departments findings are not available within the time limits set by subdivision (i), the council of governments, or delegate subregion, may act without them.
(k)Upon either action pursuant to subdivision (i), the council of governments, or delegate subregion, shall provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, or delegate subregion, as applicable, and to the department, and shall publish the adopted allocation methodology, along with its resolution and any adopted written findings, on its Internet Web site.
(l)The department may, within 90 days, review the adopted methodology and report its findings to the council of governments, or delegate subregion.
(m)(1)It is the intent of the Legislature that housing planning be coordinated and integrated with the regional transportation plan. To achieve this goal, the allocation plan shall allocate housing units within the region consistent with the development pattern included in the sustainable communities strategy.
(2)The final allocation plan shall ensure that the total regional housing need, by income category, as determined under Section 65584, is maintained, and that each jurisdiction in the region receive an allocation of units for low- and very low income households.
(3)The resolution approving the final housing need allocation plan shall demonstrate that the plan is consistent with the sustainable communities strategy in the regional transportation plan and furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
SEC. 3.5.Section 65584.04 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.04.(a)At least two years prior to a scheduled revision required by Section 65588, each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall develop, in consultation with the department, a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or within the subregion, where applicable pursuant to this section. The methodology shall further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(b)(1)No more than six months prior to the development of a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected housing need, each council of governments shall survey each of its member jurisdictions to request, at a minimum, information regarding the factors listed in subdivision (e) that will allow the development of a methodology based upon the factors established in subdivision (e).
(2)With respect to the objective in paragraph (5) of subdivision (d) of Section 65584, the survey shall review and compile information that will allow the development of a methodology based upon the issues, strategies, and actions that are included, as available, in an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice or an Assessment of Fair Housing completed by any city or county or the department that covers communities within the area served by the council of governments, and in housing elements adopted pursuant to this article by cities and counties within the area served by the council of governments.
(3)The council of governments shall seek to obtain the information in a manner and format that is comparable throughout the region and utilize readily available data to the extent possible.
(4)The information provided by a local government pursuant to this section shall be used, to the extent possible, by the council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, as source information for the methodology developed pursuant to this section. The survey shall state that none of the information received may be used as a basis for reducing the total housing need established for the region pursuant to Section 65584.01.
(5)If the council of governments fails to conduct a survey pursuant to this subdivision, a city, county, or city and county may submit information related to the items listed in subdivision (e) prior to the public comment period provided for in subdivision (d).
(c)The council of governments shall electronically report the results of the survey of fair housing issues, strategies, and actions compiled pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b). The report shall describe common themes and effective strategies employed by cities and counties within the area served by the council of governments, including common themes and effective strategies around avoiding the displacement of lower-income households. The council of governments shall also identify significant barriers to affirmatively furthering fair housing at the regional level and may recommend strategies or actions to overcome those barriers. A council of governments or metropolitan planning organization, as appropriate, may use this information for any other purpose, including publication within a regional transportation plan adopted pursuant to Section 65080 or to inform the land use assumptions that are applied in the development of a regional transportation plan.
(d)Public participation and access shall be required in the development of the methodology and in the process of drafting and adoption of the allocation of the regional housing needs. Participation by organizations other than local jurisdictions and councils of governments shall be solicited in a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community as well as members of protected classes under Section 12955. The proposed methodology, along with any relevant underlying data and assumptions, an explanation of how information about local government conditions gathered pursuant to subdivision (b) has been used to develop the proposed methodology, how each of the factors listed in subdivision (e) is incorporated into the methodology, and how the proposed methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (e) of Section 65584, shall be distributed to all cities, counties, any subregions, and members of the public who have made a written or electronic request for the proposed methodology and published on the council of governments, or delegate subregions, Internet Web site. The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall conduct at least one public hearing to receive oral and written comments on the proposed methodology.
(e)To the extent that sufficient data is available from local governments pursuant to subdivision (b) or other sources, each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall include the following factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs:
(1)Each member jurisdictions existing and projected jobs and housing relationship. This shall include an estimate, based on readily available data, of the number of low-wage jobs within the jurisdiction and how many housing units within the jurisdiction are affordable to low-wage workers, as well as an estimate based on readily available data, of projected job growth and projected household growth by income level within each member jurisdiction during the planning period.
(2)The opportunities and constraints to development of additional housing in each member jurisdiction, including all of the following:
(A)Lack of capacity for sewer or water service due to federal or state laws, regulations or regulatory actions, or supply and distribution decisions made by a sewer or water service provider other than the local jurisdiction that preclude the jurisdiction from providing necessary infrastructure for additional development during the planning period.
(B)The availability of land suitable for urban development or for conversion to residential use, the availability of underutilized land, and opportunities for infill development and increased residential densities. The council of governments may not limit its consideration of suitable housing sites or land suitable for urban development to existing zoning ordinances and land use restrictions of a locality, but shall consider the potential for increased residential development under alternative zoning ordinances and land use restrictions. The determination of available land suitable for urban development may exclude lands where the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or the Department of Water Resources has determined that the flood management infrastructure designed to protect that land is not adequate to avoid the risk of flooding.
(C)Lands preserved or protected from urban development under existing federal or state programs, or both, designed to protect open space, farmland, environmental habitats, and natural resources on a long-term basis, including land zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation that is subject to a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of that jurisdiction that prohibits or restricts conversion to non-agricultural uses.
(D)County policies to preserve prime agricultural land, as defined pursuant to Section 56064, within an unincorporated area, and land within an unincorporated area zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation that is subject to a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of that jurisdiction that prohibits or restricts its conversion to non-agricultural uses.
(3)The distribution of household growth assumed for purposes of a comparable period of regional transportation plans and opportunities to maximize the use of public transportation and existing transportation infrastructure.
(4)Agreements between a county and cities in a county to direct growth toward incorporated areas of the county, and land within an unincorporated area zoned or designated for agricultural protection or presentation that is subject to a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of the jurisdiction that prohibits or restricts conversion to nonagricultural uses.
(5)The loss of units contained in assisted housing developments, as defined in paragraph (9) of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, that changed to non-low-income use through mortgage prepayment, subsidy contract expirations, or termination of use restrictions.
(6)The percentage of existing households at each of the income levels listed in subdivision (e) of Section 65584 that are paying more than 30 percent and more than 50 percent of their income in rent.
(7)The rate of overcrowding.
(8)The housing needs of farmworkers.
(9)The housing needs generated by the presence of a private university or a campus of the California State University or the University of California within any member jurisdiction.
(10)The loss of units during a state of emergency that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 8550) of Division 1 of Title 2), during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision pursuant to Section 65588 that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the analysis.
(11)The regions greenhouse gas emissions targets provided by the State Air Resources Board pursuant to Section 65080.
(12)Any other factors adopted by the council of governments, that further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584, provided that the council of governments specifies which of the objectives each additional factor is necessary to further. The council of governments may include additional factors unrelated to furthering the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 so long as the additional factors do not undermine the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 and are applied equally across all household income levels as described in subdivision (f) of Section 65584 and the council of governments makes a finding that the factor is necessary to address significant health and safety conditions.
(f)The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall explain in writing how each of the factors described in subdivision (e) was incorporated into the methodology and how the methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. The methodology may include numerical weighting. This information and any other supporting materials used in determining the methodology, shall be posted on the council of governments, or delegate subregions, Internet Web site.
(g)The following criteria shall not be a justification for a determination or a reduction in a jurisdictions share of the regional housing need:
(1)Any ordinance, policy, voter-approved measure, or standard of a city or county that directly or indirectly limits the number of residential building permits issued by a city or county.
(2)Prior underproduction of housing in a city or county from the previous regional housing need allocation, as determined by each jurisdictions annual production report submitted pursuant to subparagraph (H) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 65400.
(3)Stable population numbers in a city or county from the previous regional housing needs cycle.
(h)Following the conclusion of the public comment period described in subdivision (d) on the proposed allocation methodology, and after making any revisions deemed appropriate by the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, as a result of comments received during the public comment period, and as a result of consultation with the department, each council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall publish a draft allocation methodology on its Internet Web site and submit the draft allocation methodology, along with the information required pursuant to subdivision (e), to the department.
(i)Within 60 days, the department shall review the draft allocation methodology and report its written findings to the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable. In its written findings the department shall determine whether the methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. If the department determines that the methodology is not consistent with subdivision (d) of Section 65584, the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall take one of the following actions:
(1)Revise the methodology to further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 and adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology.
(2)Adopt the regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology without revisions and include within its resolution of adoption findings, supported by substantial evidence, as to why the council of governments, or delegate subregion, believes that the methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 despite the findings of the department.
(j)If the departments findings are not available within the time limits set by subdivision (i), the council of governments, or delegate subregion, may act without them.
(k)Upon either action pursuant to subdivision (i), the council of governments, or delegate subregion, shall provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, or delegate subregion, as applicable, and to the department, and shall publish the adopted allocation methodology, along with its resolution and any adopted written findings, on its Internet Web site.
(l)The department may, within 90 days, review the adopted methodology and report its findings to the council of governments, or delegate subregion.
(m)(1)It is the intent of the Legislature that housing planning be coordinated and integrated with the regional transportation plan. To achieve this goal, the allocation plan shall allocate housing units within the region consistent with the development pattern included in the sustainable communities strategy.
(2)The final allocation plan shall ensure that the total regional housing need, by income category, as determined under Section 65584, is maintained, and that each jurisdiction in the region receive an allocation of units for low- and very low income households.
(3)The resolution approving the final housing need allocation plan shall demonstrate that the plan is consistent with the sustainable communities strategy in the regional transportation plan and furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
SEC. 4.Section 65584.05 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.05.(a)At least one and one-half years prior to the scheduled revision required by Section 65588, each council of governments and delegate subregion, as applicable, shall distribute a draft allocation of regional housing needs to each local government in the region or subregion, where applicable, and the department, based on the methodology adopted pursuant to Section 65584.04 and shall publish the draft allocation on its Internet Web site. The draft allocation shall include the underlying data and methodology on which the allocation is based, and a statement as to how it furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. It is the intent of the Legislature that the draft allocation should be distributed prior to the completion of the update of the applicable regional transportation plan. The draft allocation shall distribute to localities and subregions, if any, within the region the entire regional housing need determined pursuant to Section 65584.01 or within subregions, as applicable, the subregions entire share of the regional housing need determined pursuant to Section 65584.03.
(b)Within 45 days following receipt of the draft allocation, a local government within the region or the delegate subregion, as applicable, or the department may appeal to the council of governments or the delegate subregion for a revision of the share of the regional housing need proposed to be allocated to one or more local governments. Appeals shall be based upon comparable data available for all affected jurisdictions and accepted planning methodology, and supported by adequate documentation, and shall include a statement as to why the revision is necessary to further the intent of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. An appeal pursuant to this subdivision shall be consistent with, and not to the detriment of, the development pattern in an applicable sustainable communities strategy developed pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 65080. Appeals shall be limited to any of the following circumstances:
(1)The council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, failed to adequately consider the information submitted pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 65584.04.
(2)The council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, failed to determine the share of the regional housing need in accordance with the information described in, and the methodology established pursuant to, Section 65584.04, and in a manner that furthers, and does not undermine, the intent of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(3)A significant and unforeseen change in circumstances has occurred in the local jurisdiction or jurisdictions that merits a revision of the information submitted pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 65584.04. Appeals on this basis shall only be made by the jurisdiction or jurisdictions where the change in circumstances has occurred.
(c)At the close of the period for filing appeals pursuant to subdivision (b), the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall notify all other local governments within the region or delegate subregion and the department of all appeals and shall make all materials submitted in support of each appeal available on a publicly available Internet Web site. Local governments and the department may, within 45 days, comment on one or more appeals. If no appeals are filed, the draft allocation shall be issued as the proposed final allocation plan pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (e).
(d)No later than 30 days after the close of the comment period, and after providing all local governments within the region or delegate subregion, as applicable, at least 21 days prior notice, the council of governments or delegate subregion shall conduct one public hearing to consider all appeals filed pursuant to subdivision (b) and all comments received pursuant to subdivision (c).
(e)No later than 45 days after the public hearing pursuant to subdivision (d), the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall do both of the following:
(1)Make a final determination that either accepts, rejects, or modifies each appeal for a revised share filed pursuant to subdivision (b). Final determinations shall be based upon the information and methodology described in Section 65584.04 and whether the revision is necessary to further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. The final determination shall be in writing and shall include written findings as to how the determination is consistent with this article. The final determination on an appeal may require the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to adjust the share of the regional housing need allocated to one or more local governments that are not the subject of an appeal.
(2)Issue a proposed final allocation plan.
(f)In the proposed final allocation plan, the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall adjust allocations to local governments based upon the results of the appeals process. If the adjustments total 7 percent or less of the regional housing need determined pursuant to Section 65584.01, or, as applicable, total 7 percent or less of the subregions share of the regional housing need as determined pursuant to Section 65584.03, then the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall distribute the adjustments proportionally to all local governments. If the adjustments total more than 7 percent of the regional housing need, then the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall develop a methodology to distribute the amount greater than the 7 percent to local governments. In no event shall the total distribution of housing need equal less than the regional housing need, as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01, nor shall the subregional distribution of housing need equal less than its share of the regional housing need as determined pursuant to Section 65584.03.
(g)Within 45 days after the issuance of the proposed final allocation plan by the council of governments and each delegate subregion, as applicable, the council of governments shall hold a public hearing to adopt a final allocation plan. To the extent that the final allocation plan fully allocates the regional share of statewide housing need, as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01 and has taken into account all appeals, the council of governments shall have final authority to determine the distribution of the regions existing and projected housing need as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01. The council of governments shall submit its final allocation plan to the department within three days of adoption. Within 30 days after the departments receipt of the final allocation plan adopted by the council of governments, the department shall determine whether or not the final allocation plan is consistent with the existing and projected housing need for the region, as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01. The department may revise the determination of the council of governments if necessary to obtain this consistency.
(h)Any authority of the council of governments to review and revise the share of a city or county of the regional housing need under this section shall not constitute authority to revise, approve, or disapprove the manner in which the share of the city or county of the regional housing need is implemented through its housing program.
(i)Any time period in subdivision (d) or (e) may be extended by a council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, for up to 30 days.
SEC. 5.Section 65584.06 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.06.(a)For cities and counties without a council of governments, the department shall determine and distribute the existing and projected housing need, in accordance with Section 65584 and this section. If the department determines that a county or counties, supported by a resolution adopted by the board or boards of supervisors, and a majority of cities within the county or counties representing a majority of the population of the county or counties, possess the capability and resources and has agreed to accept the responsibility, with respect to its jurisdiction, for the distribution of the regional housing need, the department shall delegate this responsibility to the cities and county or counties.
(b)The distribution of regional housing need shall, based upon available data and in consultation with the cities and counties, take into consideration market demand for housing, the distribution of household growth within the county assumed in the regional transportation plan where applicable, employment opportunities and commuting patterns, the availability of suitable sites and public facilities, agreements between a county and cities in a county to direct growth toward incorporated areas of the county, or other considerations as may be requested by the affected cities or counties and agreed to by the department. As part of the allocation of the regional housing need, the department shall provide each city and county with data describing the assumptions and methodology used in calculating its share of the regional housing need. Consideration of suitable housing sites or land suitable for urban development is not limited to existing zoning ordinances and land use restrictions of a locality, but shall include consideration of the potential for increased residential development under alternative zoning ordinances and land use restrictions. The determination of available land suitable for urban development may exclude lands where the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or the Department of Water Resources has determined that the flood management infrastructure designed to protect that land is not adequate to avoid the risk of flooding.
(c)Within 90 days following the departments determination of a draft distribution of the regional housing need to the cities and the county, a city or county may propose to revise the determination of its share of the regional housing need in accordance with criteria set forth in the draft distribution. The proposed revised share shall be based upon comparable data available for all affected jurisdictions, and accepted planning methodology, and shall be supported by adequate documentation.
(d)(1)Within 60 days after the end of the 90-day time period for the revision by the cities or county, the department shall accept the proposed revision, modify its earlier determination, or indicate why the proposed revision is inconsistent with the regional housing need.
(2)If the department does not accept the proposed revision, then, within 30 days, the city or county may request a public hearing to review the determination.
(3)The city or county shall be notified within 30 days by certified mail, return receipt requested, of at least one public hearing regarding the determination.
(4)The date of the hearing shall be at least 10 but not more than 15 days from the date of the notification.
(5)Before making its final determination, the department shall consider all comments received and shall include a written response to each request for revision received from a city or county.
(e)If the department accepts the proposed revision or modifies its earlier determination, the city or county shall use that share. If the department grants a revised allocation pursuant to subdivision (d), the department shall ensure that the total regional housing need is maintained. The departments final determination shall be in writing and shall include information explaining how its action is consistent with this section. If the department indicates that the proposed revision is inconsistent with the regional housing need, the city or county shall use the share that was originally determined by the department. The department, within its final determination, may adjust the allocation of a city or county that was not the subject of a request for revision of the draft distribution.
(f)The department shall issue a final regional housing need allocation for all cities and counties within 45 days of the completion of the local review period.
(g)Statutory changes enacted after the date the department issued a final determination pursuant to this section shall not be a basis for a revision of the final determination.
SEC. 6.Nothing in this act shall be read to change a jurisdictions obligations, discretion, or flexibility under existing law related to the preparation and adoption of a housing element, nor shall it be read to compel a jurisdiction to take any one particular action that is not already required by law or prohibit a jurisdiction from taking any one particular action that is not already prohibited by law in implementing a housing element.
SEC. 7.(a)Section 1.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 65584 of the Government Code proposed by both this bill and Senate Bill 828. That section in this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2019, (2) each bill amends Section 65584 of the Government Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 828, in which case Section 1 of this bill shall not become operative.
(b)Section 2.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 65584.01 of the Government Code proposed by both this bill and Senate Bill 828. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2019, (2) each bill amends Section 65584.01 of the Government Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 828, in which case Section 2 of this bill shall not become operative.
(c)(1)Section 3.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 65584.04 of the Government Code proposed by both this bill and Senate Bill 828. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2019, (2) each bill amends Section 65584.04 of the Government Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 828, in which case Section 3 of this bill shall not become operative.
SEC. 8.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
(a)(1)For the fourth and subsequent revisions of the housing element pursuant to Section 65588, the department shall determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region pursuant to this article. For purposes of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, the share of a city or county of the regional housing need shall include that share of the housing need of persons at all income levels within the area significantly affected by the general plan of the city or county.
(2)While it is the intent of the Legislature that cities, counties, and cities and counties should undertake all necessary actions to encourage, promote, and facilitate the development of housing to accommodate the entire regional housing need, it is recognized, however, that future housing production may not equal the regional housing need established for planning purposes.
(3)The Legislature finds and declares that insufficient housing in job centers hinders the states environmental quality and runs counter to the states environmental goals. In particular, when Californians seeking affordable housing are forced to drive longer distances to work, an increased amount of greenhouse gases and other pollutants is released and puts in jeopardy the achievement of the states climate goals, as established pursuant to Section 38566 of the Health and Safety Code, and clean air goals.
(b)The department, in consultation with each council of governments, shall determine each regions existing and projected housing need pursuant to Section 65584.01 at least two years prior to the scheduled revision required pursuant to Section 65588. The appropriate council of governments, or for cities and counties without a council of governments, the department, shall adopt a final regional housing need plan that allocates a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county at least one year prior to the scheduled revision for the region required by Section 65588. The allocation plan prepared by a council of governments shall be prepared pursuant to Sections 65584.04 and 65584.05.
(c)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the due dates for the determinations of the department or for the council of governments, respectively, regarding the regional housing need may be extended by the department by not more than 60 days if the extension will enable access to more recent critical population or housing data from a pending or recent release of the United States Census Bureau or the Department of Finance. If the due date for the determination of the department or the council of governments is extended for this reason, the department shall extend the corresponding housing element revision deadline pursuant to Section 65588 by not more than 60 days.
(d)The regional housing needs allocation plan shall further all of the following objectives:
(1)Increasing the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner, which shall result in each jurisdiction receiving an allocation of units for low- and very low income households.
(2)Promoting infill development and socioeconomic equity, the protection of environmental and agricultural resources, and the encouragement of efficient development patterns. patterns, and the achievement of the regions greenhouse gas reductions targets provided by the Air Resources Board pursuant to Section 65080.
(3)Promoting an improved intraregional relationship between jobs and housing, including an improved balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction.
(4)Allocating a lower proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately high share of households in that income category, and allocating a higher proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately low share of households in that income category, as compared to the countywide distribution of households in that category from the most recent decennial United States census. American Community Survey.
(5)Increasing access to areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents, avoiding displacement and affirmatively Affirmatively furthering fair housing.
(e)For purposes of this section, areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents means areas that provide pathways to better lives, including through health, education, and employment.(e)For purposes of this section, affirmatively furthering fair housing means taking meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics. Specifically, affirmatively furthering fair housing means taking meaningful actions that, taken together, address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity, replacing segregated living patterns with truly integrated and balanced living patterns, transforming racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity, and fostering and maintaining compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws.
(f)For purposes of this section, household income levels are as determined by the department as of the most recent decennial census pursuant American Community Survey to the following code sections:
(1)Very low incomes as defined by Section 50105 of the Health and Safety Code.
(2)Lower incomes, as defined by Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
(3)Moderate incomes, as defined by Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(4)Above moderate incomes are those exceeding the moderate-income level of Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(g)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, determinations made by the department, a council of governments, or a city or county pursuant to this section or Section 65584.01, 65584.02, 65584.03, 65584.04, 65584.05, 65584.06, 65584.07, or 65584.08 are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code).
SEC. 1.5.Section 65584 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.(a)(1)For the fourth and subsequent revisions of the housing element pursuant to Section 65588, the department shall determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region pursuant to this article. For purposes of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, the share of a city or county of the regional housing need shall include that share of the housing need of persons at all income levels within the area significantly affected by the general plan of the city or county.
(2)While it It is the intent of the Legislature that cities, counties, and cities and counties should undertake all necessary actions to encourage, promote, and facilitate the development of housing to accommodate the entire regional housing need, it is recognized, however, and reasonable actions should be taken by local and regional governments to ensure that future housing production may not equal meets, at a minimum, the regional housing need established for planning purposes. These actions shall include applicable reforms and incentives in Section 65582.1.
(3)The Legislature finds and declares that insufficient housing in job centers hinders the states environmental quality and runs counter to the states environmental goals. In particular, when Californians seeking affordable housing are forced to drive longer distances to work, an increased amount of greenhouse gases and other pollutants is released and puts in jeopardy the achievement of the states climate goals, as established pursuant to Section 38566 of the Health and Safety Code, and clean air goals.
(b)The department, in consultation with each council of governments, shall determine each regions existing and projected housing need pursuant to Section 65584.01 at least two years prior to the scheduled revision required pursuant to Section 65588. The appropriate council of governments, or for cities and counties without a council of governments, the department, shall adopt a final regional housing need plan that allocates a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county at least one year prior to the scheduled revision for the region required by Section 65588. The allocation plan prepared by a council of governments shall be prepared pursuant to Sections 65584.04 and 65584.05 with the advice of the department. 65584.05.
(c)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the due dates for the determinations of the department or for the council of governments, respectively, regarding the regional housing need may be extended by the department by not more than 60 days if the extension will enable access to more recent critical population or housing data from a pending or recent release of the United States Census Bureau or the Department of Finance. If the due date for the determination of the department or the council of governments is extended for this reason, the department shall extend the corresponding housing element revision deadline pursuant to Section 65588 by not more than 60 days.
(d)The regional housing needs allocation plan shall be consistent with further all of the following objectives:
(1)Increasing the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner, which shall result in each jurisdiction receiving an allocation of units for low- and very low income households.
(2)Promoting infill development and socioeconomic equity, the protection of environmental and agricultural resources, and the encouragement of efficient development patterns. patterns, and the achievement of the regions greenhouse gas reductions targets provided by the State Air Resources Board pursuant to Section 65080.
(3)Promoting an improved intraregional relationship between jobs and housing. housing, including an improved balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction.
(4)Allocating a lower proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately high share of households in that income category, as compared to the countywide distribution of households in that category from the most recent decennial United States census. American Community Survey.
(5)Affirmatively furthering fair housing.
(e)For purposes of this section, affirmatively furthering fair housing means taking meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics. Specifically, affirmatively furthering fair housing means taking meaningful actions that, taken together, address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity, replacing segregated living patterns with truly integrated and balanced living patterns, transforming racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity, and fostering and maintaining compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws.
(e)(f)For purposes of this section, household income levels are as determined by the department as of the most recent decennial census American Community Survey pursuant to the following code sections:
(1)Very low incomes as defined by Section 50105 of the Health and Safety Code.
(2)Lower incomes, as defined by Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
(3)Moderate incomes, as defined by Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(4)Above moderate incomes are those exceeding the moderate-income level of Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(f)(g)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, determinations made by the department, a council of governments, or a city or county pursuant to this section or Section 65584.01, 65584.02, 65584.03, 65584.04, 65584.05, 65584.06, 65584.07, or 65584.08 are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code).
SEC. 2.Section 65584.01 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.01.For the fourth and subsequent revision of the housing element pursuant to Section 65588, the department, in consultation with each council of governments, where applicable, shall determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region in the following manner:
(a)The departments determination shall be based upon population projections produced by the Department of Finance and regional population forecasts used in preparing regional transportation plans, in consultation with each council of governments. If the total regional population forecast for the projection year, developed by the council of governments and used for the preparation of the regional transportation plan, is within a range of 1.5 percent of the total regional population forecast for the projection year by the Department of Finance, then the population forecast developed by the council of governments shall be the basis from which the department determines the existing and projected need for housing in the region. If the difference between the total population projected by the council of governments and the total population projected for the region by the Department of Finance is greater than 1.5 percent, then the department and the council of governments shall meet to discuss variances in methodology used for population projections and seek agreement on a population projection for the region to be used as a basis for determining the existing and projected housing need for the region. If no agreement is reached, then the population projection for the region shall be the population projection for the region prepared by the Department of Finance as may be modified by the department as a result of discussions with the council of governments.
(b)(1)At least 26 months prior to the scheduled revision pursuant to Section 65588 and prior to developing the existing and projected housing need for a region, the department shall meet and consult with the council of governments regarding the assumptions and methodology to be used by the department to determine the regions housing needs. The council of governments shall provide data assumptions from the councils projections, including, if available, the following data for the region:
(A)Anticipated household growth associated with projected population increases.
(B)Household size data and trends in household size.
(C)The percentage of renters households that are overcrowded. For purposes of this subparagraph, the term overcrowded means more than one resident per room in each room in a dwelling.
(D)The rate of household formation, or headship rates, based on age, gender, ethnicity, or other established demographic measures.
(E)The vacancy rates in existing housing stock, and the vacancy rates for healthy housing market functioning and regional mobility, as well as housing replacement needs.
(F)Other characteristics of the composition of the projected population.
(G)The relationship between jobs and housing, including any imbalance between jobs and housing.
(H)The loss of units during a state of emergency that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 8550) of Division 1 of Title 2), during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision pursuant to Section 65588 that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the data request.
(2)The department may accept or reject the information provided by the council of governments or modify its own assumptions or methodology based on this information. After consultation with the council of governments, the department shall make determinations in writing on the assumptions for each of the factors listed in subparagraphs (A) to (G), inclusive, of paragraph (1) and the methodology it shall use and shall provide these determinations to the council of governments.
(c)(1)After consultation with the council of governments, the department shall make a determination of the regions existing and projected housing need based upon the assumptions and methodology determined pursuant to subdivision (b). The regions existing and projected housing need shall reflect the achievement of a feasible balance between jobs and housing within the region using the regional employment projections in the applicable regional transportation plan. Within 30 days following notice of the determination from the department, the council of governments may file an objection to the departments determination of the regions existing and projected housing need with the department.
(2)The objection shall be based on and substantiate either of the following:
(A)The department failed to base its determination on the population projection for the region established pursuant to subdivision (a), and shall identify the population projection which the council of governments believes should instead be used for the determination and explain the basis for its rationale.
(B)The regional housing need determined by the department is not a reasonable application of the methodology and assumptions determined pursuant to subdivision (b). The objection shall include a proposed alternative determination of its regional housing need based upon the determinations made in subdivision (b), including analysis of why the proposed alternative would be a more reasonable application of the methodology and assumptions determined pursuant to subdivision (b).
(3)If a council of governments files an objection pursuant to this subdivision and includes with the objection a proposed alternative determination of its regional housing need, it shall also include documentation of its basis for the alternative determination. Within 45 days of receiving an objection filed pursuant to this section, the department shall consider the objection and make a final written determination of the regions existing and projected housing need that includes an explanation of the information upon which the determination was made.
(d)Statutory changes enacted after the date the department issued a final determination pursuant to this section shall not be a basis for a revision of the final determination.
SEC. 2.5.Section 65584.01 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.01.For the fourth and subsequent revision of the housing element pursuant to Section 65588, the department, in consultation with each council of governments, where applicable, shall determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region in the following manner:
(a)The departments determination shall be based upon population projections produced by the Department of Finance and regional population forecasts used in preparing regional transportation plans, in consultation with each council of governments. If the total regional population forecast for the projection year, developed by the council of governments and used for the preparation of the regional transportation plan, is within a range of 1.5 percent of the total regional population forecast for the projection year by the Department of Finance, then the population forecast developed by the council of governments shall be the basis from which the department determines the existing and projected need for housing in the region. If the difference between the total population projected by the council of governments and the total population projected for the region by the Department of Finance is greater than 1.5 percent, then the department and the council of governments shall meet to discuss variances in methodology used for population projections and seek agreement on a population projection for the region to be used as a basis for determining the existing and projected housing need for the region. If no agreement is reached, then the population projection for the region shall be the population projection for the region prepared by the Department of Finance as may be modified by the department as a result of discussions with the council of governments.
(b)(1)At least 26 months prior to the scheduled revision pursuant to Section 65588 and prior to developing the existing and projected housing need for a region, the department shall meet and consult with the council of governments regarding the assumptions and methodology to be used by the department to determine the regions housing needs. The council of governments shall provide data assumptions from the councils projections, including, if available, the following data for the region:
(A)Anticipated household growth associated with projected population increases.
(B)Household size data and trends in household size.
(C)The percentage of renters households that are overcrowded. For purposes of this subparagraph, the overcrowded and the overcrowding rate for a comparable housing market. For purposes of this subparagraph:
(i)The term overcrowded means more than one resident per room in each room in a dwelling.
(ii)The term overcrowded rate for a comparable housing market means that the overcrowding rate is no more than the average overcrowding rate in comparable regions throughout the nation, as determined by the council of governments.
(D)The rate of household formation, or headship rates, based on age, gender, ethnicity, or other established demographic measures.
(E)The vacancy rates in existing housing stock, and the vacancy rates for healthy housing market functioning and regional mobility, as well as housing replacement needs. For purposes of this subparagraph, the vacancy rate for a healthy rental housing market shall be considered no less than 5 percent.
(F)Other characteristics of the composition of the projected population.
(G)The relationship between jobs and housing, including any imbalance between jobs and housing.
(H)The percentage of households that are cost burdened and the rate of housing cost burden for a healthy housing market. For the purposes of this subparagraph:
(i)The term cost burdened means the share of very low-, low-, moderate-, and above moderate-income households that are paying more than 30 percent of household income on housing costs.
(ii)The term rate of housing cost burden for a healthy housing market means that the rate of households that are cost burdened is no more than the average rate of households that are cost burdened in comparable regions throughout the nation, as determined by the council of governments.
(I)The loss of units during a state of emergency that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 8550) of Division 1 of Title 2), during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision pursuant to Section 65588 that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the data request.
(2)The department may accept or reject the information provided by the council of governments or modify its own assumptions or methodology based on this information. After consultation with the council of governments, the department shall make determinations in writing on the assumptions for each of the factors listed in subparagraphs (A) to (G), (I), inclusive, of paragraph (1) and the methodology it shall use and shall provide these determinations to the council of governments. The methodology submitted by the department may make adjustments based on the regions total projected households, which includes existing households as well as projected households.
(c)(1)After consultation with the council of governments, the department shall make a determination of the regions existing and projected housing need based upon the assumptions and methodology determined pursuant to subdivision (b). The regions existing and projected housing need shall reflect the achievement of a feasible balance between jobs and housing within the region using the regional employment projections in the applicable regional transportation plan. Within 30 days following notice of the determination from the department, the council of governments may file an objection to the departments determination of the regions existing and projected housing need with the department.
(2)The objection shall be based on and substantiate either of the following:
(A)The department failed to base its determination on the population projection for the region established pursuant to subdivision (a), and shall identify the population projection which the council of governments believes should instead be used for the determination and explain the basis for its rationale.
(B)The regional housing need determined by the department is not a reasonable application of the methodology and assumptions determined pursuant to subdivision (b). The objection shall include a proposed alternative determination of its regional housing need based upon the determinations made in subdivision (b), including analysis of why the proposed alternative would be a more reasonable application of the methodology and assumptions determined pursuant to subdivision (b).
(3)If a council of governments files an objection pursuant to this subdivision and includes with the objection a proposed alternative determination of its regional housing need, it shall also include documentation of its basis for the alternative determination. Within 45 days of receiving an objection filed pursuant to this section, the department shall consider the objection and make a final written determination of the regions existing and projected housing need that includes an explanation of the information upon which the determination was made.
(d)Statutory changes enacted after the date the department issued a final determination pursuant to this section shall not be a basis for a revision of the final determination.
SEC. 2.SEC. 3.Section 65584.04 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.04.(a)At least two years prior to a scheduled revision required by Section 65588, each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall develop, in consultation with the department, a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or within the subregion, where applicable pursuant to this section. The methodology shall further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(b)(1)No more than six months prior to the development of a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected housing need, each council of governments shall survey each of its member jurisdictions to request, at a minimum, information regarding the factors listed in subdivision (d) (e) that will allow the development of a methodology based upon the factors established in subdivision (d). (e).
(2)With respect to the objective in paragraph (5) of subdivision (d) of Section 65584, the survey shall review and compile information that will allow the development of a methodology based upon the issues, strategies, and actions that are included, as available, in an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice or an Assessment of Fair Housing completed by any city or county or the department that covers communities within the area served by the council of governments, and in housing elements adopted pursuant to this article by cities and counties within the area served by the council of governments.
(2)(3)The council of governments shall seek to obtain the information in a manner and format that is comparable throughout the region and utilize readily available data to the extent possible.
(3)(4)The information provided by a local government pursuant to this section shall be used, to the extent possible, by the council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, as source information for the methodology developed pursuant to this section. The survey shall state that none of the information received may be used as a basis for reducing the total housing need established for the region pursuant to Section 65584.01.
(4)(5)If the council of governments fails to conduct a survey pursuant to this subdivision, a city, county, or city and county may submit information related to the items listed in subdivision (d) (e) prior to the public comment period provided for in subdivision (c). (d).
(c)The council of governments shall electronically report the results of the survey of fair housing issues, strategies, and actions compiled pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b). The report shall describe common themes and effective strategies employed by cities and counties within the area served by the council of governments, including common themes and effective strategies around avoiding the displacement of lower-income households. The council of governments shall also identify significant barriers to affirmatively furthering fair housing at the regional level and may recommend strategies or actions to overcome those barriers. A council of governments or metropolitan planning organization, as appropriate, may use this information for any other purpose, including publication within a regional transportation plan adopted pursuant to Section 65080 or to inform the land use assumptions that are applied in the development of a regional transportation plan.
(c)(d)Public participation and access shall be required in the development of the methodology and in the process of drafting and adoption of the allocation of the regional housing needs. Participation by organizations other than local jurisdictions and councils of governments shall be solicited in a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community. community as well as members of protected classes under Section 12955. The proposed methodology, along with any relevant underlying data and assumptions, an explanation of how information about local government conditions gathered pursuant to subdivision (b) has been used to develop the proposed methodology, how each of the factors listed in subdivision (d) (e) is incorporated into the methodology, and how the proposed methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) (e) of Section 65584, shall be distributed to all cities, counties, any subregions, and members of the public who have made a written or electronic request for the proposed methodology and published on the council of governments, or delegate subregions, Internet Web site. The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall conduct at least one public hearing to receive oral and written comments on the proposed methodology.
(d)(e)To the extent that sufficient data is available from local governments pursuant to subdivision (b) or other sources, each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall include the following factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs:
(1)Each member jurisdictions existing and projected jobs and housing relationship. This shall include data on an estimate, based on readily available data, of the number of low-wage jobs within the jurisdiction and how many housing units within the jurisdiction are affordable to low-wage workers at those wage levels, as well as how many jobs were added and at what wage levels compared to how many housing units were added and at what income levels in the last as well as an estimate, based on readily available data, of projected job growth and projected household growth by income level within each member jurisdiction during the planning period.
(2)The opportunities and constraints to development of additional housing in each member jurisdiction, including all of the following:
(A)Lack of capacity for sewer or water service due to federal or state laws, regulations or regulatory actions, or supply and distribution decisions made by a sewer or water service provider other than the local jurisdiction that preclude the jurisdiction from providing necessary infrastructure for additional development during the planning period.
(B)The availability of land suitable for urban development or for conversion to residential use, the availability of underutilized land, and opportunities for infill development and increased residential densities. The council of governments may not limit its consideration of suitable housing sites or land suitable for urban development to existing zoning ordinances and land use restrictions of a locality, but shall consider the potential for increased residential development under alternative zoning ordinances and land use restrictions. The determination of available land suitable for urban development may exclude lands where the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or the Department of Water Resources has determined that the flood management infrastructure designed to protect that land is not adequate to avoid the risk of flooding.
(C)Lands preserved or protected from urban development under existing federal or state programs, or both, designed to protect open space, farmland, environmental habitats, and natural resources on a long-term basis.
(D)County policies to preserve prime agricultural land, as defined pursuant to Section 56064, within an unincorporated area. area, and land within an unincorporated area zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation that is subject to a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of that jurisdiction that prohibits or restricts its conversion to non-agricultural uses.
(3)The distribution of household growth assumed for purposes of a comparable period of regional transportation plans and opportunities to maximize the use of public transportation and existing transportation infrastructure.
(4)Agreements between a county and cities in a county to direct growth toward incorporated areas of the county.
(5)The loss of units contained in assisted housing developments, as defined in paragraph (9) of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, that changed to non-low-income use through mortgage prepayment, subsidy contract expirations, or termination of use restrictions.
(6)The percentage of existing households at each of the income levels listed in subdivision (e) of Section 65584 that are paying more than 30 percent and more than 50 percent of their income in rent.
(7)The rate of overcrowding.
(8)The housing needs of farmworkers.
(9)The housing needs generated by the presence of a private university or a campus of the California State University or the University of California within any member jurisdiction.
(10)The loss of units during a state of emergency that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 8550) of Division 1 of Title 2), during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision pursuant to Section 65588 that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the analysis.
(11)The regions greenhouse gas emissions targets provided by the Air Resources Board pursuant to Section 65080.
(10)(12)Any other factors adopted by the council of governments, that further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584, provided that the council of governments specifies which of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 that each additional factor is necessary to further. The council of governments may include additional factors unrelated to furthering the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 so long as the additional factors do not undermine the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 and are applied equally across all household income levels as described in subdivision (f) of Section 65584 and the council of governments makes a finding that the factor is necessary to address specific significant health and safety conditions.
(e)(f)The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall explain in writing how each of the factors described in subdivision (d) (e) was incorporated into the methodology and how the methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. The methodology may include numerical weighting. This information and any other supporting materials used in determining the methodology, shall be posted on the council of governments, or delegate subregions, Internet Web site.
(f)(g)Any ordinance, policy, voter-approved measure, or standard of a city or county that directly or indirectly limits the number of residential building permits issued by a city or county shall not be a justification for a determination or a reduction in the share of a city or county of the regional housing need.
(g)(h)Following the conclusion of the 60-day public comment period described in subdivision (c) on the proposed allocation methodology, and after making any revisions deemed appropriate by the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, as a result of comments received during the public comment period, and as a result of consultation with the department, each council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall publish a draft allocation methodology on its Internet Web site and submit the draft allocation methodology, along with the information required pursuant to subdivision (e), (f), to the department. Within 60 days, the department shall determine whether or not the methodology furthers, and does not undermine, the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(h)(i)Within 60 days, the department shall review the draft allocation methodology and report its written findings to the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable. In its written findings the department shall determine whether the methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. If the department determines that the methodology is not consistent with does not further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584, the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall consider the findings made by the department and take one of the following actions:
(1)Revise the methodology in accordance with the departments findings to further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 and adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology.
(2)Adopt a final the regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology without revisions and include within its resolution of adoption written findings findings, supported by substantial evidence, as to why the council of governments, or delegate subregion, believes that the methodology is consistent with furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 despite the findings of the department.
(j)If the departments findings are not available within the time limits set by subdivision (i), the council of governments, or delegate subregion, may act without them.
(i)(k)Upon either action pursuant to subdivision (h), (i), the council of governments, or delegate subregion, shall provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, or delegate subregion, as applicable, and to the department, and shall publish the adopted allocation methodology methodology, along with its resolution and any adopted written findings, on its Internet Web site.
(l)The department may, within 90 days, review the adopted methodology and report its findings to the council of governments, or delegate subregion.
(j)(m)(1)It is the intent of the Legislature that housing planning be coordinated and integrated with the regional transportation plan. To achieve this goal, the allocation plan shall allocate housing units within the region consistent with the development pattern included in the sustainable communities strategy.
(2)The final allocation plan shall ensure that the total regional housing need, by income category, as determined under Section 65584, is maintained, and that each jurisdiction in the region receive an allocation of units for low- and very low income households.
(3)The resolution approving the final housing need allocation plan shall demonstrate that the plan is consistent with the sustainable communities strategy in the regional transportation plan and furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
SEC. 3.5.Section 65584.04 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.04.(a)At least two years prior to a scheduled revision required by Section 65588, each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall develop develop, in consultation with the department, a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or within the subregion, where applicable pursuant to this section. The methodology shall be consistent with further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(b)(1)No more than six months prior to the development of a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected housing need, each council of governments shall survey each of its member jurisdictions to request, at a minimum, information regarding the factors listed in subdivision (d) (e) that will allow the development of a methodology based upon the factors established in subdivision (d). (e).
(2)With respect to the objective in paragraph (5) of subdivision (d) of Section 65584, the survey shall review and compile information that will allow the development of a methodology based upon the issues, strategies, and actions that are included, as available, in an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice or an Assessment of Fair Housing completed by any city or county or the department that covers communities within the area served by the council of governments, and in housing elements adopted pursuant to this article by cities and counties within the area served by the council of governments.
(2)(3)The council of governments shall seek to obtain the information in a manner and format that is comparable throughout the region and utilize readily available data to the extent possible.
(3)(4)The information provided by a local government pursuant to this section shall be used, to the extent possible, by the council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, as source information for the methodology developed pursuant to this section. The survey shall state that none of the information received may be used as a basis for reducing the total housing need established for the region pursuant to Section 65584.01.
(4)(5)If the council of governments fails to conduct a survey pursuant to this subdivision, a city, county, or city and county may submit information related to the items listed in subdivision (d) (e) prior to the public comment period provided for in subdivision (c). (d).
(c)The council of governments shall electronically report the results of the survey of fair housing issues, strategies, and actions compiled pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b). The report shall describe common themes and effective strategies employed by cities and counties within the area served by the council of governments, including common themes and effective strategies around avoiding the displacement of lower-income households. The council of governments shall also identify significant barriers to affirmatively furthering fair housing at the regional level and may recommend strategies or actions to overcome those barriers. A council of governments or metropolitan planning organization, as appropriate, may use this information for any other purpose, including publication within a regional transportation plan adopted pursuant to Section 65080 or to inform the land use assumptions that are applied in the development of a regional transportation plan.
(c)(d)Public participation and access shall be required in the development of the methodology and in the process of drafting and adoption of the allocation of the regional housing needs. Participation by organizations other than local jurisdictions and councils of governments shall be solicited in a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community. community as well as members of protected classes under Section 12955. The proposed methodology, along with any relevant underlying data and assumptions, and an explanation of how information about local government conditions gathered pursuant to subdivision (b) has been used to develop the proposed methodology, and how each of the factors listed in subdivision (d) (e) is incorporated into the methodology, and how the proposed methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (e) of Section 65584, shall be distributed to all cities, counties, any subregions, and members of the public who have made a written or electronic request for the proposed methodology. methodology and published on the council of governments, or delegate subregions, Internet Web site. The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall conduct at least one public hearing to receive oral and written comments on the proposed methodology.
(d)(e)To the extent that sufficient data is available from local governments pursuant to subdivision (b) or other sources, each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall include the following factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs:
(1)Each member jurisdictions existing and projected jobs and housing relationship. This shall include an estimate, based on readily available data, of the number of low-wage jobs within the jurisdiction and how many housing units within the jurisdiction are affordable to low-wage workers, as well as an estimate based on readily available data, of projected job growth and projected household growth by income level within each member jurisdiction during the planning period.
(2)The opportunities and constraints to development of additional housing in each member jurisdiction, including all of the following:
(A)Lack of capacity for sewer or water service due to federal or state laws, regulations or regulatory actions, or supply and distribution decisions made by a sewer or water service provider other than the local jurisdiction that preclude the jurisdiction from providing necessary infrastructure for additional development during the planning period.
(B)The availability of land suitable for urban development or for conversion to residential use, the availability of underutilized land, and opportunities for infill development and increased residential densities. The council of governments may not limit its consideration of suitable housing sites or land suitable for urban development to existing zoning ordinances and land use restrictions of a locality, but shall consider the potential for increased residential development under alternative zoning ordinances and land use restrictions. The determination of available land suitable for urban development may exclude lands where the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or the Department of Water Resources has determined that the flood management infrastructure designed to protect that land is not adequate to avoid the risk of flooding.
(C)Lands preserved or protected from urban development under existing federal or state programs, or both, designed to protect open space, farmland, environmental habitats, and natural resources on a long-term basis. basis, including land zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation that is subject to a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of that jurisdiction that prohibits or restricts conversion to non-agricultural uses.
(D)County policies to preserve prime agricultural land, as defined pursuant to Section 56064, within an unincorporated area. area, and land within an unincorporated area zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation that is subject to a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of that jurisdiction that prohibits or restricts its conversion to non-agricultural uses.
(3)The distribution of household growth assumed for purposes of a comparable period of regional transportation plans and opportunities to maximize the use of public transportation and existing transportation infrastructure.
(4)The market demand for housing.(5)(4)Agreements between a county and cities in a county to direct growth toward incorporated areas of the county county, and land within an unincorporated area zoned or designated for agricultural protection or presentation that is subject to a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of the jurisdiction that prohibits or restricts conversion to nonagricultural uses.
(6)(5)The loss of units contained in assisted housing developments, as defined in paragraph (9) of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, that changed to non-low-income use through mortgage prepayment, subsidy contract expirations, or termination of use restrictions.
(7)High-housing cost burdens.(6)The percentage of existing households at each of the income levels listed in subdivision (e) of Section 65584 that are paying more than 30 percent and more than 50 percent of their income in rent.
(7)The rate of overcrowding.
(8)The housing needs of farmworkers.
(9)The housing needs generated by the presence of a private university or a campus of the California State University or the University of California within any member jurisdiction.
(10)The loss of units during a state of emergency that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 8550) of Division 1 of Title 2), during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision pursuant to Section 65588 that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the analysis.
(11)The regions greenhouse gas emissions targets provided by the State Air Resources Board pursuant to Section 65080.
(10)(12)Any other factors adopted by the council of governments. governments, that further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584, provided that the council of governments specifies which of the objectives each additional factor is necessary to further. The council of governments may include additional factors unrelated to furthering the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 so long as the additional factors do not undermine the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 and are applied equally across all household income levels as described in subdivision (f) of Section 65584 and the council of governments makes a finding that the factor is necessary to address significant health and safety conditions.
(e)(f)The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall explain in writing how each of the factors described in subdivision (d) (e) was incorporated into the methodology and how the methodology is consistent with furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. The methodology may include numerical weighting. This information and any other supporting materials used in determining the methodology, shall be posted on the council of governments, or delegate subregions, Internet Web site.
(g)The following criteria shall not be a justification for a determination or a reduction in a jurisdictions share of the regional housing need:
(f)(1)Any ordinance, policy, voter-approved measure, or standard of a city or county that directly or indirectly limits the number of residential building permits issued by a city or county shall not be a justification for a determination or a reduction in the share of a city or county of the regional housing need. county.
(2)Prior underproduction of housing in a city or county from the previous regional housing need allocation, as determined by each jurisdictions annual production report submitted pursuant to subparagraph (H) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 65400.
(3)Stable population numbers in a city or county from the previous regional housing needs cycle.
(g)In addition to the factors identified pursuant to subdivision (d), the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall identify any existing local, regional, or state incentives, such as a priority for funding or other incentives available to those local governments that are willing to accept a higher share than proposed in the draft allocation to those local governments by the council of governments or delegate subregion pursuant to Section 65584.05.(h)Following the conclusion of the 60-day public comment period described in subdivision (c) (d) on the proposed allocation methodology, and after making any revisions deemed appropriate by the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, as a result of comments received during the public comment period, and as a result of consultation with the department, each council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology and provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, or delegate subregion as applicable, and to the department. publish a draft allocation methodology on its Internet Web site and submit the draft allocation methodology, along with the information required pursuant to subdivision (e), to the department.
(i)Within 60 days, the department shall review the draft allocation methodology and report its written findings to the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable. In its written findings the department shall determine whether the methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. If the department determines that the methodology is not consistent with subdivision (d) of Section 65584, the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall take one of the following actions:
(1)Revise the methodology to further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 and adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology.
(2)Adopt the regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology without revisions and include within its resolution of adoption findings, supported by substantial evidence, as to why the council of governments, or delegate subregion, believes that the methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 despite the findings of the department.
(j)If the departments findings are not available within the time limits set by subdivision (i), the council of governments, or delegate subregion, may act without them.
(k)Upon either action pursuant to subdivision (i), the council of governments, or delegate subregion, shall provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, or delegate subregion, as applicable, and to the department, and shall publish the adopted allocation methodology, along with its resolution and any adopted written findings, on its Internet Web site.
(l)The department may, within 90 days, review the adopted methodology and report its findings to the council of governments, or delegate subregion.
(i)(m)(1)It is the intent of the Legislature that housing planning be coordinated and integrated with the regional transportation plan. To achieve this goal, the allocation plan shall allocate housing units within the region consistent with the development pattern included in the sustainable communities strategy.
(2)The final allocation plan shall ensure that the total regional housing need, by income category, as determined under Section 65584, is maintained, and that each jurisdiction in the region receive an allocation of units for low- and very low income households.
(3)The resolution approving the final housing need allocation plan shall demonstrate that the plan is consistent with the sustainable communities strategy in the regional transportation plan. plan and furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
SEC. 3.SEC. 4.Section 65584.05 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.05.(a)At least one and one-half years prior to the scheduled revision required by Section 65588, each council of governments and delegate subregion, as applicable, shall distribute a draft allocation of regional housing needs to each local government in the region or subregion, where applicable, and the department, based on the methodology adopted pursuant to Section 65584.04. 65584.04 and shall publish the draft allocation on its Internet Web site. The draft allocation shall include the underlying data and methodology on which the allocation is based, and a statement as to how it furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. It is the intent of the Legislature that the draft allocation should be distributed prior to the completion of the update of the applicable regional transportation plan. The draft allocation shall distribute to localities and subregions, if any, within the region the entire regional housing need determined pursuant to Section 65584.01 or within subregions, as applicable, the subregions entire share of the regional housing need determined pursuant to Section 65584.03.
(b)Within 45 days following receipt of the draft allocation, a local government within the region or the delegate subregion, as applicable, or the department may appeal to the council of governments or the delegate subregion for a revision of the share of the regional housing need proposed to be allocated to one or more local governments. Appeals shall be based upon comparable data available for all affected jurisdictions and accepted planning methodology, and supported by adequate documentation, and shall include a statement as to why the revision is necessary to further the intent of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. An appeal pursuant to this subdivision shall be consistent with, and not to the detriment of, the development pattern in an applicable sustainable communities strategy developed pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 65080. Appeals shall be limited to either or both any of the following criteria: circumstances:
(1)The council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, failed to adequately consider the information submitted pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 65584.04, or a significant and unforeseen change in circumstances has occurred in the local jurisdiction or jurisdictions that merits a revision of the information submitted pursuant to that subdivision. 65584.04.
(2)The council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, failed to determine the share of the regional housing need in accordance with the information described in, and the methodology established pursuant to, Section 65584.04, and in a manner that furthers, and does not undermine, the intent of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(3)A significant and unforeseen change in circumstances has occurred in the local jurisdiction or jurisdictions that merits a revision of the information submitted pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 65584.04. Appeals on this basis shall only be made by the jurisdiction or jurisdictions where the change in circumstances has occurred.
(c)At the close of the period for filing appeals pursuant to subdivision (b), the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall notify all other local governments within the region or delegate subregion and the department of all appeals and shall make all materials submitted in support of each appeal available on a publicly available Internet Web site. Local governments and the department may, within 45 days, comment on one or more appeals. If no appeals are filed, the draft allocation shall be issued as the proposed final allocation plan pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (e).
(d)No later than 30 days after the close of the comment period, and after providing all local governments within the region or delegate subregion, as applicable, at least 21 days prior notice, the council of governments or delegate subregion shall conduct one public hearing to consider all appeals filed pursuant to subdivision (b) and all comments received pursuant to subdivision (c).
(e)No later than 45 days after the public hearing pursuant to subdivision (d), the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall do both of the following:
(1)Make a final determination that either accepts, rejects, or modifies each appeal for a revised share filed pursuant to subdivision (b). Final determinations shall be based upon the information and methodology described in Section 65584.04 and whether the revision is necessary to further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. The final determination shall be in writing and shall include written findings as to how the determination is consistent with this article. The final determination on an appeal may require the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to adjust the share of the regional housing need allocated to one or more local governments that are not the subject of an appeal.
(2)Issue a proposed final allocation plan.
(f)In the proposed final allocation plan, the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall adjust allocations to local governments based upon the results of the appeals process. If the adjustments total 7 percent or less of the regional housing need determined pursuant to Section 65584.01, or, as applicable, total 7 percent or less of the subregions share of the regional housing need as determined pursuant to Section 65584.03, then the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall distribute the adjustments proportionally to all local governments. If the adjustments total more than 7 percent of the regional housing need, then the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall develop a methodology to distribute the amount greater than the 7 percent to local governments. In no event shall the total distribution of housing need equal less than the regional housing need, as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01, nor shall the subregional distribution of housing need equal less than its share of the regional housing need as determined pursuant to Section 65584.03.
(g)Within 45 days after the issuance of the proposed final allocation plan by the council of governments and each delegate subregion, as applicable, the council of governments shall hold a public hearing to adopt a final allocation plan. To the extent that the final allocation plan fully allocates the regional share of statewide housing need, as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01 and has taken into account all appeals, the council of governments shall have final authority to determine the distribution of the regions existing and projected housing need as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01. The council of governments shall submit its final allocation plan to the department within three days of adoption. Within 30 days after the departments receipt of the final allocation plan adopted by the council of governments, the department shall determine whether or not the final allocation plan is consistent with the existing and projected housing need for the region, as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01. The department may revise the determination of the council of governments if necessary to obtain this consistency.
(h)Any authority of the council of governments to review and revise the share of a city or county of the regional housing need under this section shall not constitute authority to revise, approve, or disapprove the manner in which the share of the city or county of the regional housing need is implemented through its housing program.
(i)Any time period in subdivision (d) or (e) may be extended by a council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, for up to 30 days.
SEC. 5.Section 65584.06 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.06.(a)For cities and counties without a council of governments, the department shall determine and distribute the existing and projected housing need, in accordance with Section 65584 and this section. If the department determines that a county or counties, supported by a resolution adopted by the board or boards of supervisors, and a majority of cities within the county or counties representing a majority of the population of the county or counties, possess the capability and resources and has agreed to accept the responsibility, with respect to its jurisdiction, for the distribution of the regional housing need, the department shall delegate this responsibility to the cities and county or counties.
(b)The distribution of regional housing need shall, based upon available data and in consultation with the cities and counties, take into consideration market demand for housing, the distribution of household growth within the county assumed in the regional transportation plan where applicable, employment opportunities and commuting patterns, the availability of suitable sites and public facilities, agreements between a county and cities in a county to direct growth toward incorporated areas of the county, or other considerations as may be requested by the affected cities or counties and agreed to by the department. As part of the allocation of the regional housing need, the department shall provide each city and county with data describing the assumptions and methodology used in calculating its share of the regional housing need. Consideration of suitable housing sites or land suitable for urban development is not limited to existing zoning ordinances and land use restrictions of a locality, but shall include consideration of the potential for increased residential development under alternative zoning ordinances and land use restrictions. The determination of available land suitable for urban development may exclude lands where the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or the Department of Water Resources has determined that the flood management infrastructure designed to protect that land is not adequate to avoid the risk of flooding.
(c)Within 90 days following the departments determination of a draft distribution of the regional housing need to the cities and the county, a city or county may propose to revise the determination of its share of the regional housing need in accordance with criteria set forth in the draft distribution. The proposed revised share shall be based upon comparable data available for all affected jurisdictions, and accepted planning methodology, and shall be supported by adequate documentation.
(d)(1)Within 60 days after the end of the 90-day time period for the revision by the cities or county, the department shall accept the proposed revision, modify its earlier determination, or indicate why the proposed revision is inconsistent with the regional housing need.
(2)If the department does not accept the proposed revision, then, within 30 days, the city or county may request a public hearing to review the determination.
(3)The city or county shall be notified within 30 days by certified mail, return receipt requested, of at least one public hearing regarding the determination.
(4)The date of the hearing shall be at least 10 but not more than 15 days from the date of the notification.
(5)Before making its final determination, the department shall consider all comments received and shall include a written response to each request for revision received from a city or county.
(e)If the department accepts the proposed revision or modifies its earlier determination, the city or county shall use that share. If the department grants a revised allocation pursuant to subdivision (d), the department shall ensure that the total regional housing need is maintained. The departments final determination shall be in writing and shall include information explaining how its action is consistent with this section. If the department indicates that the proposed revision is inconsistent with the regional housing need, the city or county shall use the share that was originally determined by the department. The department, within its final determination, may adjust the allocation of a city or county that was not the subject of a request for revision of the draft distribution.
(f)The department shall issue a final regional housing need allocation for all cities and counties within 45 days of the completion of the local review period.
(g)Statutory changes enacted after the date the department issued a final determination pursuant to this section shall not be a basis for a revision of the final determination.
SEC. 4.Section 65584.08 is added to the Government Code, to read:65584.08.Nothing in this article shall be read to change a jurisdictions obligations, discretion, or flexibility under existing law related to the preparation and adoption of a housing element, nor shall it be read to compel a jurisdiction to take any one particular action that is not already required by law or prohibit a jurisdiction from taking any one particular action that is not already prohibited by law in implementing a housing element.SEC. 6.Nothing in this act shall be read to change a jurisdictions obligations, discretion, or flexibility under existing law related to the preparation and adoption of a housing element, nor shall it be read to compel a jurisdiction to take any one particular action that is not already required by law or prohibit a jurisdiction from taking any one particular action that is not already prohibited by law in implementing a housing element.
SEC. 7.(a)Section 1.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 65584 of the Government Code proposed by both this bill and Senate Bill 828. That section in this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2019, (2) each bill amends Section 65584 of the Government Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 828, in which case Section 1 of this bill shall not become operative.
(b)Section 2.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 65584.01 of the Government Code proposed by both this bill and Senate Bill 828. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2019, (2) each bill amends Section 65584.01 of the Government Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 828, in which case Section 2 of this bill shall not become operative.
(c)(1)Section 3.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 65584.04 of the Government Code proposed by both this bill and Senate Bill 828. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2019, (2) each bill amends Section 65584.04 of the Government Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 828, in which case Section 3 of this bill shall not become operative.
SEC. 5.SEC. 8.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
(a)(1)For the fourth and subsequent revisions of the housing element pursuant to Section 65588, the department shall determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region pursuant to this article. For purposes of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, the share of a city or county of the regional housing need shall include that share of the housing need of persons at all income levels within the area significantly affected by the general plan of the city or county.
(2)While it is the intent of the Legislature that cities, counties, and cities and counties should undertake all necessary actions to encourage, promote, and facilitate the development of housing to accommodate the entire regional housing need, it is recognized, however, that future housing production may not equal the regional housing need established for planning purposes.
(3)The Legislature finds and declares that insufficient housing in job centers hinders the states environmental quality and runs counter to the states environmental goals. In particular, when Californians seeking affordable housing are forced to drive longer distances to work, an increased amount of greenhouse gases and other pollutants is released and puts in jeopardy the achievement of the states climate goals, as established pursuant to Section 38566 of the Health and Safety Code, and clean air goals.
(b)The department, in consultation with each council of governments, shall determine each regions existing and projected housing need pursuant to Section 65584.01 at least two years prior to the scheduled revision required pursuant to Section 65588. The appropriate council of governments, or for cities and counties without a council of governments, the department, shall adopt a final regional housing need plan that allocates a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county at least one year prior to the scheduled revision for the region required by Section 65588. The allocation plan prepared by a council of governments shall be prepared pursuant to Sections 65584.04 and 65584.05.
(c)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the due dates for the determinations of the department or for the council of governments, respectively, regarding the regional housing need may be extended by the department by not more than 60 days if the extension will enable access to more recent critical population or housing data from a pending or recent release of the United States Census Bureau or the Department of Finance. If the due date for the determination of the department or the council of governments is extended for this reason, the department shall extend the corresponding housing element revision deadline pursuant to Section 65588 by not more than 60 days.
(d)The regional housing needs allocation plan shall further all of the following objectives:
(1)Increasing the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner, which shall result in each jurisdiction receiving an allocation of units for low- and very low income households.
(2)Promoting infill development and socioeconomic equity, the protection of environmental and agricultural resources, and the encouragement of efficient development patterns.
(3)Promoting an improved intraregional relationship between jobs and housing, including an improved balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction.
(4)Allocating a lower proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately high share of households in that income category, and allocating a higher proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately low share of households in that income category, as compared to the countywide distribution of households in that category from the most recent decennial United States census.
(5)Increasing access to areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents, avoiding displacement and affirmatively furthering fair housing.
(e)For purposes of this section, areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents means areas that provide pathways to better lives, including through health, education, and employment.
(f)For purposes of this section, household income levels are as determined by the department as of the most recent decennial census pursuant to the following code sections:
(1)Very low incomes as defined by Section 50105 of the Health and Safety Code.
(2)Lower incomes, as defined by Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
(3)Moderate incomes, as defined by Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(4)Above moderate incomes are those exceeding the moderate-income level of Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(g)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, determinations made by the department, a council of governments, or a city or county pursuant to this section or Section 65584.01, 65584.02, 65584.03, 65584.04, 65584.05, 65584.06, 65584.07, or 65584.08 are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code).
SEC. 2.Section 65584.04 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.04.(a)At least two years prior to a scheduled revision required by Section 65588, each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall develop develop, in consultation with the department, a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or within the subregion, where applicable pursuant to this section. The methodology shall further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(b)(1)No more than six months prior to the development of a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected housing need, each council of governments shall survey each of its member jurisdictions to request, at a minimum, information regarding the factors listed in subdivision (d) that will allow the development of a methodology based upon the factors established in subdivision (d).
(2)The council of governments shall seek to obtain the information in a manner and format that is comparable throughout the region and utilize readily available data to the extent possible.
(3)The information provided by a local government pursuant to this section shall be used, to the extent possible, by the council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, as source information for the methodology developed pursuant to this section. The survey shall state that none of the information received may be used as a basis for reducing the total housing need established for the region pursuant to Section 65584.01.
(4)If the council of governments fails to conduct a survey pursuant to this subdivision, a city, county, or city and county may submit information related to the items listed in subdivision (d) prior to the public comment period provided for in subdivision (c).
(c)Public participation and access shall be required in the development of the methodology and in the process of drafting and adoption of the allocation of the regional housing needs. Participation by organizations other than local jurisdictions and councils of governments shall be solicited in a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community. The proposed methodology, along with any relevant underlying data and assumptions, an explanation of how information about local government conditions gathered pursuant to subdivision (b) has been used to develop the proposed methodology, how each of the factors listed in subdivision (d) is incorporated into the methodology, and how the proposed methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584, shall be distributed to all cities, counties, any subregions, and members of the public who have made a written or electronic request for the proposed methodology. methodology and published on the council of governments, or delegate subregions, Internet Web site. The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall conduct at least two one public hearings hearing to receive oral and written comments on the proposed methodology.
(d)To the extent that sufficient data is available from local governments pursuant to subdivision (b) or other sources, each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall include the following factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs:
(1)Each member jurisdictions existing and projected jobs and housing relationship. This shall include data on the number of low-wage jobs within the jurisdiction and how many housing units within the jurisdiction are affordable to workers at those wage levels, as well as how many jobs were added and at what wage levels compared to how many housing units were added and at what income levels in the last planning period.
(2)The opportunities and constraints to development of additional housing in each member jurisdiction, including all of the following:
(A)Lack of capacity for sewer or water service due to federal or state laws, regulations or regulatory actions, or supply and distribution decisions made by a sewer or water service provider other than the local jurisdiction that preclude the jurisdiction from providing necessary infrastructure for additional development during the planning period.
(B)The availability of land suitable for urban development or for conversion to residential use, the availability of underutilized land, and opportunities for infill development and increased residential densities. The council of governments may not limit its consideration of suitable housing sites or land suitable for urban development to existing zoning ordinances and land use restrictions of a locality, but shall consider the potential for increased residential development under alternative zoning ordinances and land use restrictions. The determination of available land suitable for urban development may exclude lands where the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or the Department of Water Resources has determined that the flood management infrastructure designed to protect that land is not adequate to avoid the risk of flooding.
(C)Lands preserved or protected from urban development under existing federal or state programs, or both, designed to protect open space, farmland, environmental habitats, and natural resources on a long-term basis.
(D)County policies to preserve prime agricultural land, as defined pursuant to Section 56064, within an unincorporated area.
(3)The distribution of household growth assumed for purposes of a comparable period of regional transportation plans and opportunities to maximize the use of public transportation and existing transportation infrastructure.
(4)The existing and projected demand for housing at each of the income levels listed in subdivision (e) of Section 65584.(5)(4)Agreements between a county and cities in a county to direct growth toward incorporated areas of the county.
(6)(5)The loss of units contained in assisted housing developments, as defined in paragraph (9) of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, that changed to non-low-income use through mortgage prepayment, subsidy contract expirations, or termination of use restrictions.
(7)(6)The percentage of existing households at each of the income levels listed in subdivision (e) of Section 65584 that are paying more than 30 percent and more than 50 percent of their income in rent.
(8)(7)The rate of overcrowding.
(9)(8)The housing needs of farmworkers.
(10)(9)The housing needs generated by the presence of a private university or a campus of the California State University or the University of California within any member jurisdiction.
(11)(10)Any other factors adopted by the council of governments, provided that the council of governments specifies which of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65594 65584 that each additional factor is necessary to further. The council of governments may include additional factors unrelated to furthering the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 so long as the additional factors do not undermine the objectives and the council of governments makes a finding that the factor is necessary to address specific health and safety conditions.
(e)The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall explain in writing how each of the factors described in subdivision (d) was incorporated into the methodology and how the methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. The methodology may include numerical weighting. This information shall be posted on the council of governments, or delegate subregions, Internet Web site.
(f)Any ordinance, policy, voter-approved measure, or standard of a city or county that directly or indirectly limits the number of residential building permits issued by a city or county shall not be a justification for a determination or a reduction in the share of a city or county of the regional housing need.
(g)Following the conclusion of the 60-day public comment period described in subdivision (c) on the proposed allocation methodology, and after making any revisions deemed appropriate by the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, as a result of comments received during the public comment period, and as a result of consultation with the department, each council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall publish a draft allocation methodology on its Internet Web site and submit the draft allocation methodology methodology, along with the information required pursuant to subdivision (e), to the department. Within 60 days, the department shall determine whether or not the methodology furthers, and does not undermine, the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(h)Following the receipt of the departments determination, the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall make any necessary changes and adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology and provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, or delegate subregion as applicable, and to the department.(h)If the department determines that the methodology is not consistent with subdivision (d) of Section 65584, the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall take one of the following actions:
(1)Revise the methodology in accordance with the departments findings and adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology.
(2)Adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology without revisions and include within its resolution of adoption written findings as to why the council of governments, or delegate subregion, believes that the methodology is consistent with subdivision (d) of Section 65584 despite the findings of the department.
(i)Upon either action pursuant to subdivision (h), the council of governments, or delegate subregion, shall provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, or delegate subregion, as applicable, and to the department, and shall publish the adopted allocation methodology on its Internet Web site.
(i)(j)(1)It is the intent of the Legislature that housing planning be coordinated and integrated with the regional transportation plan. To achieve this goal, the allocation plan shall allocate housing units within the region consistent with the development pattern included in the sustainable communities strategy. Nothing in this consistency requirement shall limit the application of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (d).
(2)The final allocation plan shall ensure that the total regional housing need, by income category, as determined under Section 65584, is maintained, and that each jurisdiction in the region receive an allocation of units for low- and very low income households.
(3)The resolution approving the final housing need allocation plan shall demonstrate that the plan is consistent with the sustainable communities strategy in the regional transportation plan and furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
SEC. 3.Section 65584.05 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.05.(a)At least one and one-half years prior to the scheduled revision required by Section 65588, each council of governments and delegate subregion, as applicable, shall distribute a draft allocation of regional housing needs to each local government in the region or subregion, where applicable, based on the methodology adopted pursuant to Section 65584.04. The draft allocation shall include the underlying data and methodology on which the allocation is based, and a statement as to how it furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. It is the intent of the Legislature that the draft allocation should be distributed prior to the completion of the update of the applicable regional transportation plan. The draft allocation shall distribute to localities and subregions, if any, within the region the entire regional housing need determined pursuant to Section 65584.01 or within subregions, as applicable, the subregions entire share of the regional housing need determined pursuant to Section 65584.03.
(b)Within 45 days following receipt of the draft allocation, a local government within the region or the delegate subregion, as applicable, or the department may appeal to the council of governments or the delegate subregion for a revision of the share of the regional housing need proposed to be allocated to one or more local governments. Appeals shall be based upon comparable data available for all affected jurisdictions and accepted planning methodology, and supported by adequate documentation, and shall include a statement as to how why the revision is necessary to further the intent of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. An appeal pursuant to this subdivision shall be consistent with, and not to the detriment of, the development pattern in an applicable sustainable communities strategy developed pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 65080. Appeals shall be limited to either or both of the following criteria:
(1)The council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, failed to adequately consider the information submitted pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 65584.04, or a significant and unforeseen change in circumstances has occurred in the local jurisdiction or jurisdictions that merits a revision of the information submitted pursuant to that subdivision.
(2)The council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, failed to determine the share of the regional housing need in accordance with the information described in, and the methodology established pursuant to, Section 65584.04, and in a manner that furthers, and does not undermine, the intent of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(c)At the close of the period for filing appeals pursuant to subdivision (b), the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall notify all other local governments within the region or delegate subregion and the department of all appeals and shall make all materials submitted in support of each appeal available on a publicly available Internet Web site. Local governments and the department may, within 45 days, comment on one or more appeals. If no appeals are filed, the draft allocation shall be issued as the proposed final allocation plan pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (e).
(d)No later than 30 days after the close of the comment period, and after providing all local governments within the region or delegate subregion, as applicable, at least 21 days prior notice, the council of governments or delegate subregion shall conduct one public hearing to consider all appeals filed pursuant to subdivision (b) and all comments received pursuant to subdivision (c).
(e)No later than 45 days after the public hearing pursuant to subdivision (d), the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall do both of the following:
(1)Make a final determination that either accepts, rejects, or modifies each appeal for a revised share filed pursuant to subdivision (b). Final determinations shall be based upon the information and methodology described in Section 65584.04 and whether the revision is necessary to further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. The final determination shall be in writing and shall include written findings as to how the determination is consistent with this article. The final determination on an appeal may require the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to adjust the share of the regional housing need allocated to one or more local governments that are not the subject of an appeal.
(2)Issue a proposed final allocation plan.
(f)In the proposed final allocation plan, the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall adjust allocations to local governments based upon the results of the appeals process. If the adjustments total 7 percent or less of the regional housing need determined pursuant to Section 65584.01, or, as applicable, total 7 percent or less of the subregions share of the regional housing need as determined pursuant to Section 65584.03, then the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall distribute the adjustments proportionally to all local governments. If the adjustments total more than 7 percent of the regional housing need, then the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall develop a methodology to distribute the amount greater than the 7 percent to local governments. In no event shall the total distribution of housing need equal less than the regional housing need, as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01, nor shall the subregional distribution of housing need equal less than its share of the regional housing need as determined pursuant to Section 65584.03.
(g)Within 45 days after the issuance of the proposed final allocation plan by the council of governments and each delegate subregion, as applicable, the council of governments shall hold a public hearing to adopt a final allocation plan. To the extent that the final allocation plan fully allocates the regional share of statewide housing need, as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01 and has taken into account all appeals, the council of governments shall have final authority to determine the distribution of the regions existing and projected housing need as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01. The council of governments shall submit its final allocation plan to the department within three days of adoption. Within 30 days after the departments receipt of the final allocation plan adopted by the council of governments, the department shall determine whether or not the final allocation plan is consistent with the existing and projected housing need for the region, as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01. The department may revise the determination of the council of governments if necessary to obtain this consistency.
(h)Any authority of the council of governments to review and revise the share of a city or county of the regional housing need under this section shall not constitute authority to revise, approve, or disapprove the manner in which the share of the city or county of the regional housing need is implemented through its housing program.
(i)Any time period in subdivision (d) or (e) may be extended by a council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, for up to 30 days.
SEC. 4.Section 65584.08 is added to the Government Code, to read:65584.08.Nothing in this article shall be read to change a jurisdictions obligations, discretion, or flexibility under existing law related to the preparation and adoption of a housing element, nor shall it be read to compel a jurisdiction to take any one particular action that is not already required by law or prohibit a jurisdiction from taking any one particular action that is not already prohibited by law in implementing a housing element.
SEC. 5.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
(a)(1)For the fourth and subsequent revisions of the housing element pursuant to Section 65588, the department shall determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region pursuant to this article. For purposes of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, the share of a city or county of the regional housing need shall include that share of the housing need of persons at all income levels within the area significantly affected by the general plan of the city or county.
(2)While it is the intent of the Legislature that cities, counties, and cities and counties should undertake all necessary actions to encourage, promote, and facilitate the development of housing to accommodate the entire regional housing need, it is recognized, however, that future housing production may not equal the regional housing need established for planning purposes.
(3)The Legislature finds and declares that insufficient housing in job centers hinders the states environmental quality and runs counter to the states environmental goals. In particular, when Californians seeking affordable housing are forced to drive longer distances to work, an increased amount of greenhouse gases and other pollutants is released and puts in jeopardy the achievement of the states climate goals, as established pursuant to Section 38566 of the Health and Safety Code, and clean air goals.
(b)The department, in consultation with each council of governments, shall determine each regions existing and projected housing need pursuant to Section 65584.01 at least two years prior to the scheduled revision required pursuant to Section 65588. The appropriate council of governments, or for cities and counties without a council of governments, the department, shall adopt a final regional housing need plan that allocates a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county at least one year prior to the scheduled revision for the region required by Section 65588. The allocation plan prepared by a council of governments shall be prepared pursuant to Sections 65584.04 and 65584.05.
(c)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the due dates for the determinations of the department or for the council of governments, respectively, regarding the regional housing need may be extended by the department by not more than 60 days if the extension will enable access to more recent critical population or housing data from a pending or recent release of the United States Census Bureau or the Department of Finance. If the due date for the determination of the department or the council of governments is extended for this reason, the department shall extend the corresponding housing element revision deadline pursuant to Section 65588 by not more than 60 days.
(d)The regional housing needs allocation plan shall further all of the following objectives:
(1)Increasing the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner, which shall result in each jurisdiction receiving an allocation of units for low- and very low income households.
(2)Promoting infill development and socioeconomic equity, the protection of environmental and agricultural resources, and the encouragement of efficient development patterns.
(3)Promoting an improved intraregional relationship between jobs and housing, including an improved balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction.
(4)Allocating a lower proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately high share of households in that income category, and allocating a higher proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately low share of households in that income category, as compared to the countywide distribution of households in that category from the most recent decennial United States census.
(5)Increasing access to areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents, avoiding displacement and affirmatively furthering fair housing.
(e)For purposes of this section, areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents means areas that provide pathways to better lives, including through health, education, and employment.
(f)For purposes of this section, household income levels are as determined by the department as of the most recent decennial census pursuant to the following code sections:
(1)Very low incomes as defined by Section 50105 of the Health and Safety Code.
(2)Lower incomes, as defined by Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
(3)Moderate incomes, as defined by Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(4)Above moderate incomes are those exceeding the moderate-income level of Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(g)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, determinations made by the department, a council of governments, or a city or county pursuant to this section or Section 65584.01, 65584.02, 65584.03, 65584.04, 65584.05, 65584.06, 65584.07, or 65584.08 are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code).
SEC. 2.Section 65584.04 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.04.(a)At least two years prior to a scheduled revision required by Section 65588, each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall develop a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or within the subregion, where applicable pursuant to this section. The methodology shall further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(b)(1)No more than six months prior to the development of a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected housing need, each council of governments shall survey each of its member jurisdictions to request, at a minimum, information regarding the factors listed in subdivision (d) that will allow the development of a methodology based upon the factors established in subdivision (d).
(2)The council of governments shall seek to obtain the information in a manner and format that is comparable throughout the region and utilize readily available data to the extent possible.
(3)The information provided by a local government pursuant to this section shall be used, to the extent possible, by the council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, as source information for the methodology developed pursuant to this section. The survey shall state that none of the information received may be used as a basis for reducing the total housing need established for the region pursuant to Section 65584.01.
(4)If the council of governments fails to conduct a survey pursuant to this subdivision, a city, county, or city and county may submit information related to the items listed in subdivision (d) prior to the public comment period provided for in subdivision (c).
(c)Public participation and access shall be required in the development of the methodology and in the process of drafting and adoption of the allocation of the regional housing needs. Participation by organizations other than local jurisdictions and councils of governments shall be solicited in a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community. The proposed methodology, along with any relevant underlying data and assumptions, an explanation of how information about local government conditions gathered pursuant to subdivision (b) has been used to develop the proposed methodology, how each of the factors listed in subdivision (d) is incorporated into the methodology, and how the proposed methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584, shall be distributed to all cities, counties, any subregions, and members of the public who have made a written or electronic request for the proposed methodology. The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall conduct at least two public hearings to receive oral and written comments on the proposed methodology.
(d)To the extent that sufficient data is available from local governments pursuant to subdivision (b) or other sources, each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall include the following factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs:
(1)Each member jurisdictions existing and projected jobs and housing relationship. This shall include data on the number of low-wage jobs within the jurisdiction and how many housing units within the jurisdiction are affordable to workers at those wage levels, as well as how many jobs were added and at what wage levels compared to how many housing units were added and at what income levels in the last planning period.
(2)The opportunities and constraints to development of additional housing in each member jurisdiction, including all of the following:
(A)Lack of capacity for sewer or water service due to federal or state laws, regulations or regulatory actions, or supply and distribution decisions made by a sewer or water service provider other than the local jurisdiction that preclude the jurisdiction from providing necessary infrastructure for additional development during the planning period.
(B)The availability of land suitable for urban development or for conversion to residential use, the availability of underutilized land, and opportunities for infill development and increased residential densities. The council of governments may not limit its consideration of suitable housing sites or land suitable for urban development to existing zoning ordinances and land use restrictions of a locality, but shall consider the potential for increased residential development under alternative zoning ordinances and land use restrictions. The determination of available land suitable for urban development may exclude lands where the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or the Department of Water Resources has determined that the flood management infrastructure designed to protect that land is not adequate to avoid the risk of flooding.
(C)Lands preserved or protected from urban development under existing federal or state programs, or both, designed to protect open space, farmland, environmental habitats, and natural resources on a long-term basis.
(D)County policies to preserve prime agricultural land, as defined pursuant to Section 56064, within an unincorporated area.
(3)The distribution of household growth assumed for purposes of a comparable period of regional transportation plans and opportunities to maximize the use of public transportation and existing transportation infrastructure.
(4)The existing and projected demand for housing at each of the income levels listed in subdivision (e) of Section 65584.
(5)Agreements between a county and cities in a county to direct growth toward incorporated areas of the county.
(6)The loss of units contained in assisted housing developments, as defined in paragraph (9) of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, that changed to non-low-income use through mortgage prepayment, subsidy contract expirations, or termination of use restrictions.
(7)The percentage of existing households at each of the income levels listed in subdivision (e) of Section 65584 that are paying more than 30 percent and more than 50 percent of their income in rent.
(8)The rate of overcrowding.
(9)The housing needs of farmworkers.
(10)The housing needs generated by the presence of a private university or a campus of the California State University or the University of California within any member jurisdiction.
(11)Any other factors adopted by the council of governments, provided that the council of governments specifies which of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65594 that each additional factor is necessary to further.
(e)The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall explain in writing how each of the factors described in subdivision (d) was incorporated into the methodology and how the methodology furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. The methodology may include numerical weighting.
(f)Any ordinance, policy, voter-approved measure, or standard of a city or county that directly or indirectly limits the number of residential building permits issued by a city or county shall not be a justification for a determination or a reduction in the share of a city or county of the regional housing need.
(g)Following the conclusion of the public comment period described in subdivision (c) on the proposed allocation methodology, and after making any revisions deemed appropriate by the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, as a result of comments received during the public comment period, each council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall submit the draft allocation methodology to the department. Within 60 days, the department shall determine whether or not the methodology furthers, and does not undermine, the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(h)Following the receipt of the departments determination, the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall make any necessary changes and adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology and provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, or delegate subregion as applicable, and to the department.
(i)(1)It is the intent of the Legislature that housing planning be coordinated and integrated with the regional transportation plan. To achieve this goal, the allocation plan shall allocate housing units within the region consistent with the development pattern included in the sustainable communities strategy. Nothing in this consistency requirement shall limit the application of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (d).
(2)The final allocation plan shall ensure that the total regional housing need, by income category, as determined under Section 65584, is maintained, and that each jurisdiction in the region receive an allocation of units for low- and very low income households.
(3)The resolution approving the final housing need allocation plan shall demonstrate that the plan is consistent with the sustainable communities strategy in the regional transportation plan and furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
SEC. 3.Section 65584.05 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.05.(a)At least one and one-half years prior to the scheduled revision required by Section 65588, each council of governments and delegate subregion, as applicable, shall distribute a draft allocation of regional housing needs to each local government in the region or subregion, where applicable, based on the methodology adopted pursuant to Section 65584.04. The draft allocation shall include the underlying data and methodology on which the allocation is based, and a statement as to how it furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. It is the intent of the Legislature that the draft allocation should be distributed prior to the completion of the update of the applicable regional transportation plan. The draft allocation shall distribute to localities and subregions, if any, within the region the entire regional housing need determined pursuant to Section 65584.01 or within subregions, as applicable, the subregions entire share of the regional housing need determined pursuant to Section 65584.03.
(b)Within 60 45 days following receipt of the draft allocation, a local government may request from within the region or the delegate subregion, as applicable, or the department may appeal to the council of governments or the delegate subregion, as applicable, subregion for a revision of its share of the regional housing need. In addition, a housing organization may request from the council of governments or the delegate subregion, as applicable, a revision of the share of the regional housing need proposed to be allocated to one or more local government. These requests governments. Appeals shall be in accordance with the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 and with the factors described in paragraphs (1) to (9), inclusive, of subdivision (d) of Section 65584.04, including any information submitted by the local government or governments to the council of governments pursuant to subdivision (b) of that section. The request for a revised share shall be based upon comparable data available for all affected jurisdictions and accepted planning methodology, and supported by adequate documentation, and shall include a statement as to how it furthers, and does not undermine, the revision is necessary to further the intent of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. A request for a revised share An appeal pursuant to this subdivision shall be consistent with, and not to the detriment of, the development pattern in an applicable sustainable communities strategy developed pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 65080. Appeals shall be limited to either or both of the following criteria:
(c)Within 60 days after the request submitted pursuant to subdivision (b), the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall accept the proposed revision, modify its earlier determination, or indicate, based upon the information and methodology described in Section 65584.04, why the proposed revision is inconsistent with the regional housing need and does not further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.(d)If the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, does not accept the proposed revised share or modify the revised share to the satisfaction of the requesting party, the local government or the housing organization may appeal the draft allocation to the department based upon either or both of the following criteria:(1)The council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, failed to adequately consider the information submitted pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 65584.04, or a significant and unforeseen change in circumstances has occurred in the local jurisdiction or jurisdictions that merits a revision of the information submitted pursuant to that subdivision.(2)The council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, failed to determine the share of the regional housing need in accordance with the information described in, and the methodology established pursuant to, Section 65584.04, and in a manner that furthers, and does not undermine, the intent of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.(e)The department shall conduct public hearings to hear all appeals within 60 days after the date established to file appeals. The local government or housing organization shall be notified within 10 days by certified mail, return receipt requested, of at least one public hearing on its appeal. The date of the hearing shall be at least 30 days and not more than 35 days after the date of the notification. Before taking action on an appeal, the department shall consider all comments, recommendations, and available data based on accepted planning methodologies submitted by the appellant. The final action of the department on an appeal shall be in writing and shall include written findings, supported by a preponderance of the evidence on the record, as to how its action is consistent with this article. The final action on an appeal may require the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to adjust the allocation of one or more local governments that are not the subject of an appeal.(f)The council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall issue a proposed final allocation within 45 days after the completion of the 60-day period for hearing appeals, taking into account the departments actions on all appeals. The proposed final allocation plan shall include responses to all comments received on the proposed draft allocation and reasons for any significant revisions included in the final allocation.(1)The council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, failed to adequately consider the information submitted pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 65584.04, or a significant and unforeseen change in circumstances has occurred in the local jurisdiction or jurisdictions that merits a revision of the information submitted pursuant to that subdivision.
(2)The council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, failed to determine the share of the regional housing need in accordance with the information described in, and the methodology established pursuant to, Section 65584.04, and in a manner that furthers, and does not undermine, the intent of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(c)At the close of the period for filing appeals pursuant to subdivision (b), the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall notify all other local governments within the region or delegate subregion and the department of all appeals and shall make all materials submitted in support of each appeal available on a publicly available Internet Web site. Local governments and the department may, within 45 days, comment on one or more appeals. If no appeals are filed, the draft allocation shall be issued as the proposed final allocation plan pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (e).
(d)No later than 30 days after the close of the comment period, and after providing all local governments within the region or delegate subregion, as applicable, at least 21 days prior notice, the council of governments or delegate subregion shall conduct one public hearing to consider all appeals filed pursuant to subdivision (b) and all comments received pursuant to subdivision (c).
(e)No later than 45 days after the public hearing pursuant to subdivision (d), the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall do both of the following:
(1)Make a final determination that either accepts, rejects, or modifies each appeal for a revised share filed pursuant to subdivision (b). Final determinations shall be based upon the information and methodology described in Section 65584.04 and whether the revision is necessary to further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. The final determination shall be in writing and shall include written findings as to how the determination is consistent with this article. The final determination on an appeal may require the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to adjust the share of the regional housing need allocated to one or more local governments that are not the subject of an appeal.
(2)Issue a proposed final allocation plan.
(g)(f)In the proposed final allocation plan, the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall adjust allocations to local governments based upon the results of the revision request process and the appeals process specified in this section. appeals process. If the adjustments total 7 percent or less of the regional housing need determined pursuant to Section 65584.01, or, as applicable, total 7 percent or less of the subregions share of the regional housing need as determined pursuant to Section 65584.03, then the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall distribute the adjustments proportionally to all local governments. If the adjustments total more than 7 percent of the regional housing need, then the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall develop a methodology to distribute the amount greater than the 7 percent to local governments. In no event shall the total distribution of housing need equal less than the regional housing need, as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01, nor shall the subregional distribution of housing need equal less than its share of the regional housing need as determined pursuant to Section 65584.03. Two or more local governments may agree to an alternate distribution of appealed housing allocations between the affected local governments. If two or more local governments agree to an alternative distribution of appealed housing allocations that maintains the total housing need originally assigned to these communities, then the council of governments shall include the alternative distribution in the final allocation plan.
(h)(g)Within 45 days after the issuance of the proposed final allocation plan by the council of governments and each delegate subregion, as applicable, the council of governments shall hold a public hearing to adopt a final allocation plan. To the extent that the final allocation plan fully allocates the regional share of statewide housing need, as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01 and has taken into account the departments actions on all appeals, the council of governments shall have final authority to determine the distribution of the regions existing and projected housing need as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01. The council of governments shall submit its final allocation plan to the department within three days of adoption. Within 60 30 days after the departments receipt of the final allocation plan adopted by the council of governments, the department shall determine whether or not the final allocation plan is consistent with the existing and projected housing need for the region, as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01. The department may revise the determination of the council of governments if necessary to obtain this consistency.
(i)(h)Any authority of the council of governments to review and revise the share of a city or county of the regional housing need under this section shall not constitute authority to revise, approve, or disapprove the manner in which the share of the city or county of the regional housing need is implemented through its housing program.
(j)For purposes of this section, housing organization means a nonprofit organization whose primary mission includes providing or advocating for increased access to housing for low-income households.(i)Any time period in subdivision (d) or (e) may be extended by a council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, for up to 30 days.
SEC. 4.Section 65584.08 is added to the Government Code, to read:65584.08.Nothing in this article shall be read to change a jurisdictions obligations, discretion, or flexibility under existing law related to the preparation and adoption of a housing element, nor shall it be read to compel a jurisdiction to take any one particular action that is not already required by law or prohibit a jurisdiction from taking any one particular action that is not already prohibited by law in implementing a housing element.
SEC. 4.SEC. 5.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
(a)(1)For the fourth and subsequent revisions of the housing element pursuant to Section 65588, the department shall determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region pursuant to this article. For purposes of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, the share of a city or county of the regional housing need shall include that share of the housing need of persons at all income levels within the area significantly affected by the general plan of the city or county.
(2)While it is the intent of the Legislature that cities, counties, and cities and counties should undertake all necessary actions to encourage, promote, and facilitate the development of housing to accommodate the entire regional housing need, it is recognized, however, that future housing production may not equal the regional housing need established for planning purposes.
(3)The Legislature finds and declares that insufficient housing in job centers hinders the states environmental quality and runs counter to the states environmental goals. In particular, when Californians seeking affordable housing are forced to drive longer distances to work, an increased amount of greenhouse gases and other pollutants is released and puts in jeopardy the achievement of the states climate goals, as established pursuant to Section 38566 of the Health and Safety Code, and clean air goals.
(b)The department, in consultation with each council of governments, shall determine each regions existing and projected housing need pursuant to Section 65584.01 at least two years prior to the scheduled revision required pursuant to Section 65588. The appropriate council of governments, or for cities and counties without a council of governments, the department, shall adopt a final regional housing need plan that allocates a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county at least one year prior to the scheduled revision for the region required by Section 65588. The allocation plan prepared by a council of governments shall be prepared pursuant to Sections 65584.04 and 65584.05.
(c)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the due dates for the determinations of the department or for the council of governments, respectively, regarding the regional housing need may be extended by the department by not more than 60 days if the extension will enable access to more recent critical population or housing data from a pending or recent release of the United States Census Bureau or the Department of Finance. If the due date for the determination of the department or the council of governments is extended for this reason, the department shall extend the corresponding housing element revision deadline pursuant to Section 65588 by not more than 60 days.
(d)The regional housing needs allocation plan shall further, and not undermine the intent of, further all of the following objectives:
(1)Increasing the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner, which shall result in each jurisdiction receiving an allocation of units for low- and very low income households.
(2)Promoting infill development and socioeconomic equity, the protection of environmental and agricultural resources, and the encouragement of efficient development patterns.
(3)Promoting an improved intraregional relationship between jobs and housing, including an improved balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction.
(4)Allocating a lower proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately high share of households in that income category, and allocating a higher proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately low share of households in that income category, as compared to the countywide distribution of households in that category from the most recent decennial United States census.
(5)Increasing access to areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents, avoiding displacement and affirmatively furthering fair housing.
(e)For purposes of this section, areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents means areas that provide pathways to better lives, including through health, education, and employment.
(e)(f)For purposes of this section, household income levels are as determined by the department as of the most recent decennial census pursuant to the following code sections:
(1)Very low incomes as defined by Section 50105 of the Health and Safety Code.
(2)Lower incomes, as defined by Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
(3)Moderate incomes, as defined by Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(4)Above moderate incomes are those exceeding the moderate-income level of Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(f)(g)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, determinations made by the department, a council of governments, or a city or county pursuant to this section or Section 65584.01, 65584.02, 65584.03, 65584.04, 65584.05, 65584.06, 65584.07, or 65584.08 are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code).
SEC. 2.Section 65584.04 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.04.(a)At least two years prior to a scheduled revision required by Section 65588, each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall develop a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or within the subregion, where applicable pursuant to this section. The methodology shall further, and not undermine the intent of, further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(b)(1)No more than six months prior to the development of a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected housing need, each council of governments shall survey each of its member jurisdictions to request, at a minimum, information regarding the factors listed in subdivision (d) that will allow the development of a methodology based upon the factors established in subdivision (d).
(2)The council of governments shall seek to obtain the information in a manner and format that is comparable throughout the region and utilize readily available data to the extent possible.
(3)The information provided by a local government pursuant to this section shall be used, to the extent possible, by the council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, as source information for the methodology developed pursuant to this section. The survey shall state that none of the information received may be used as a basis for reducing the total housing need established for the region pursuant to Section 65584.01.
(4)If the council of governments fails to conduct a survey pursuant to this subdivision, a city, county, or city and county may submit information related to the items listed in subdivision (d) prior to the public comment period provided for in subdivision (c).
(c)Public participation and access shall be required in the development of the methodology and in the process of drafting and adoption of the allocation of the regional housing needs. Participation by organizations other than local jurisdictions and councils of governments shall be solicited in a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community. The proposed methodology, along with any relevant underlying data and assumptions, an explanation of how information about local government conditions gathered pursuant to subdivision (b) has been used to develop the proposed methodology, how each of the factors listed in subdivision (d) is incorporated into the methodology, and how the proposed methodology furthers, and does not undermine, the intent of furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584, shall be distributed to all cities, counties, any subregions, and members of the public who have made a request for the proposed methodology. The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall conduct at least two public hearings to receive oral and written comments on the proposed methodology.
(d)To the extent that sufficient data is available from local governments pursuant to subdivision (b) or other sources, each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall include the following factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs:
(1)Each member jurisdictions existing and projected jobs and housing relationship. This shall include data on the number of low-wage jobs within the jurisdiction and how many housing units within the jurisdiction are affordable to workers at those wage levels, as well as how many jobs were added and at what wage levels compared to how many housing units were added and at what income levels in the last planning period.
(2)The opportunities and constraints to development of additional housing in each member jurisdiction, including all of the following:
(A)Lack of capacity for sewer or water service due to federal or state laws, regulations or regulatory actions, or supply and distribution decisions made by a sewer or water service provider other than the local jurisdiction that preclude the jurisdiction from providing necessary infrastructure for additional development during the planning period.
(B)The availability of land suitable for urban development or for conversion to residential use, the availability of underutilized land, and opportunities for infill development and increased residential densities. The council of governments may not limit its consideration of suitable housing sites or land suitable for urban development to existing zoning ordinances and land use restrictions of a locality, but shall consider the potential for increased residential development under alternative zoning ordinances and land use restrictions. The determination of available land suitable for urban development may exclude lands where the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or the Department of Water Resources has determined that the flood management infrastructure designed to protect that land is not adequate to avoid the risk of flooding.
(C)Lands preserved or protected from urban development under existing federal or state programs, or both, designed to protect open space, farmland, environmental habitats, and natural resources on a long-term basis.
(D)County policies to preserve prime agricultural land, as defined pursuant to Section 56064, within an unincorporated area.
(3)The distribution of household growth assumed for purposes of a comparable period of regional transportation plans and opportunities to maximize the use of public transportation and existing transportation infrastructure.
(4)The existing and projected demand for housing at each of the income levels listed in subdivision (e) of Section 65584.
(5)Agreements between a county and cities in a county to direct growth toward incorporated areas of the county.
(6)The loss of units contained in assisted housing developments, as defined in paragraph (9) of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, that changed to non-low-income use through mortgage prepayment, subsidy contract expirations, or termination of use restrictions.
(7)The percentage of existing households at each of the income levels listed in subdivision (e) of Section 65584 that are paying more than 30% 30 percent and more than 50% 50 percent of their income in rent.
(8)The rate of overcrowding.
(9)The housing needs of farmworkers.
(10)The housing needs generated by the presence of a private university or a campus of the California State University or the University of California within any member jurisdiction.
(11)Any other factors adopted by the council of governments, provided that the council of governments specifies which of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65594 that each additional factor is necessary to further.
(e)The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall explain in writing how each of the factors described in subdivision (d) was incorporated into the methodology and how the methodology furthers, and does not undermine, the intent of furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. The methodology may include numerical weighting.
(f)Any ordinance, policy, voter-approved measure, or standard of a city or county that directly or indirectly limits the number of residential building permits issued by a city or county shall not be a justification for a determination or a reduction in the share of a city or county of the regional housing need.
(g)Following the conclusion of the public comment period described in subdivision (c) on the proposed allocation methodology, and after making any revisions deemed appropriate by the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, as a result of comments received during the public comment period, each council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall submit the draft allocation methodology to the department. Within 60 days, the department shall determine whether or not the methodology furthers, and does not undermine, the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(h)Following the receipt of the departments determination, the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall make any necessary changes and adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology and provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, or delegate subregion as applicable, and to the department.
(i)(1)It is the intent of the Legislature that housing planning be coordinated and integrated with the regional transportation plan. To achieve this goal, the allocation plan shall allocate housing units within the region consistent with the development pattern included in the sustainable communities strategy. Nothing in this consistency requirement shall limit the application of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (d).
(2)The final allocation plan shall ensure that the total regional housing need, by income category, as determined under Section 65584, is maintained, and that each jurisdiction in the region receive an allocation of units for low- and very low income households.
(3)The resolution approving the final housing need allocation plan shall demonstrate that the plan is consistent with the sustainable communities strategy in the regional transportation plan and furthers, and does not undermine, the intent of furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
SEC. 3.Section 65584.05 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.05.(a)At least one and one-half years prior to the scheduled revision required by Section 65588, each council of governments and delegate subregion, as applicable, shall distribute a draft allocation of regional housing needs to each local government in the region or subregion, where applicable, based on the methodology adopted pursuant to Section 65584.04. The draft allocation shall include the underlying data and methodology on which the allocation is based, and a statement as to how it furthers, and does not undermine, the intent of furthers the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. It is the intent of the Legislature that the draft allocation should be distributed prior to the completion of the update of the applicable regional transportation plan. The draft allocation shall distribute to localities and subregions, if any, within the region the entire regional housing need determined pursuant to Section 65584.01 or within subregions, as applicable, the subregions entire share of the regional housing need determined pursuant to Section 65584.03.
(b)Within 60 days following receipt of the draft allocation, a local government may request from the council of governments or the delegate subregion, as applicable, a revision of its share of the regional housing need. In addition, a housing organization may request from the council of governments or the delegate subregion, as applicable, a revision of the share of the regional housing need allocated to one or more local government. These requests shall be in accordance with the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 and with the factors described in paragraphs (1) to (9), inclusive, of subdivision (d) of Section 65584.04, including any information submitted by the local government or governments to the council of governments pursuant to subdivision (b) of that section. The request for a revised share shall be based upon comparable data available for all affected jurisdictions and accepted planning methodology, and supported by adequate documentation, and shall include a statement as to how it furthers, and does not undermine, the intent of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65594. 65584. A request for a revised share pursuant to this subdivision shall be consistent with, and not to the detriment of, the development pattern in an applicable sustainable communities strategy developed pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 65080.
(c)Within 60 days after the request submitted pursuant to subdivision (b), the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall accept the proposed revision, modify its earlier determination, or indicate, based upon the information and methodology described in Section 65584.04, why the proposed revision is inconsistent with the regional housing need and does not further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(d)If the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, does not accept the proposed revised share or modify the revised share to the satisfaction of the requesting party, the local government or the housing organization may appeal the draft allocation to the department based upon either or both of the following criteria:
(1)The council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, failed to adequately consider the information submitted pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 65584.04, or a significant and unforeseen change in circumstances has occurred in the local jurisdiction or jurisdictions that merits a revision of the information submitted pursuant to that subdivision.
(2)The council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, failed to determine the share of the regional housing need in accordance with the information described in, and the methodology established pursuant to, Section 65584.04, and in a manner that furthers, and does not undermine, the intent of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(e)The department shall conduct public hearings to hear all appeals within 60 days after the date established to file appeals. The local government or housing organization shall be notified within 10 days by certified mail, return receipt requested, of at least one public hearing on its appeal. The date of the hearing shall be at least 30 days and not more than 35 days after the date of the notification. Before taking action on an appeal, the department shall consider all comments, recommendations, and available data based on accepted planning methodologies submitted by the appellant. The final action of the department on an appeal shall be in writing and shall include written findings, supported by a preponderance of the evidence on the record, as to how its action is consistent with this article. The final action on an appeal may require the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to adjust the allocation of one or more local governments that are not the subject of an appeal.
(f)The council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall issue a proposed final allocation within 45 days after the completion of the 60-day period for hearing appeals, taking into account the departments actions on all appeals. The proposed final allocation plan shall include responses to all comments received on the proposed draft allocation and reasons for any significant revisions included in the final allocation.
(g)In the proposed final allocation plan, the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall adjust allocations to local governments based upon the results of the revision request process and the appeals process specified in this section. If the adjustments total 7 percent or less of the regional housing need determined pursuant to Section 65584.01, or, as applicable, total 7 percent or less of the subregions share of the regional housing need as determined pursuant to Section 65584.03, then the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall distribute the adjustments proportionally to all local governments. If the adjustments total more than 7 percent of the regional housing need, then the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall develop a methodology to distribute the amount greater than the 7 percent to local governments. In no event shall the total distribution of housing need equal less than the regional housing need, as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01, nor shall the subregional distribution of housing need equal less than its share of the regional housing need as determined pursuant to Section 65584.03. Two or more local governments may agree to an alternate distribution of appealed housing allocations between the affected local governments. If two or more local governments agree to an alternative distribution of appealed housing allocations that maintains the total housing need originally assigned to these communities, then the council of governments shall include the alternative distribution in the final allocation plan.
(h)Within 45 days after the issuance of the proposed final allocation plan by the council of governments and each delegate subregion, as applicable, the council of governments shall hold a public hearing to adopt a final allocation plan. To the extent that the final allocation plan fully allocates the regional share of statewide housing need, as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01 and has taken into account the departments actions on all appeals, the council of governments shall have final authority to determine the distribution of the regions existing and projected housing need as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01. The council of governments shall submit its final allocation plan to the department within three days of adoption. Within 60 days after the departments receipt of the final allocation plan adopted by the council of governments, the department shall determine whether or not the final allocation plan is consistent with the existing and projected housing need for the region, as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01. The department may revise the determination of the council of governments if necessary to obtain this consistency.
(i)Any authority of the council of governments to review and revise the share of a city or county of the regional housing need under this section shall not constitute authority to revise, approve, or disapprove the manner in which the share of the city or county of the regional housing need is implemented through its housing program.
(j)For purposes of this section, housing organization means a nonproject nonprofit organization whose primary mission includes providing or advocating for increased access to housing for low-income households.
SEC. 4.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
(a)(1)For the fourth and subsequent revisions of the housing element pursuant to Section 65588, the department shall determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region pursuant to this article. For purposes of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, the share of a city or county of the regional housing need shall include that share of the housing need of persons at all income levels within the area significantly affected by the general plan of the city or county.
(2)While it is the intent of the Legislature that cities, counties, and cities and counties should undertake all necessary actions to encourage, promote, and facilitate the development of housing to accommodate the entire regional housing need, it is recognized, however, that future housing production may not equal the regional housing need established for planning purposes.
(3)The Legislature finds and declares that insufficient housing in job centers hinders the states environmental quality and runs counter to the states environmental goals. In particular, when Californians seeking affordable housing are forced to drive longer distances to work, an increased amount of greenhouse gases and other pollutants is released and puts in jeopardy the achievement of the states climate goals, as established pursuant to Section 38566 of the Health and Safety Code, and clean air goals.
(b)The department, in consultation with each council of governments, shall determine each regions existing and projected housing need pursuant to Section 65584.01 at least two years prior to the scheduled revision required pursuant to Section 65588. The appropriate council of governments, or for cities and counties without a council of governments, the department, shall adopt a final regional housing need plan that allocates a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county at least one year prior to the scheduled revision for the region required by Section 65588. The allocation plan prepared by a council of governments shall be prepared pursuant to Sections 65584.04 and 65584.05 with the advice of the department. 65584.05.
(c)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the due dates for the determinations of the department or for the council of governments, respectively, regarding the regional housing need may be extended by the department by not more than 60 days if the extension will enable access to more recent critical population or housing data from a pending or recent release of the United States Census Bureau or the Department of Finance. If the due date for the determination of the department or the council of governments is extended for this reason, the department shall extend the corresponding housing element revision deadline pursuant to Section 65588 by not more than 60 days.
(d)The regional housing needs allocation plan shall be consistent with further, and not undermine the intent of, all of the following objectives:
(1)Increasing the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner, which shall result in each jurisdiction receiving an allocation of units for low- and very low income households.
(2)Promoting infill development and socioeconomic equity, the protection of environmental and agricultural resources, and the encouragement of efficient development patterns.
(3)Promoting an improved intraregional relationship between jobs and housing. housing, including an improved balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction.
(4)Allocating a lower proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately high share of households in that income category, and allocating a higher proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately low share of households in that income category, as compared to the countywide distribution of households in that category from the most recent decennial United States census.
(5)Increasing access to areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents, avoiding displacement and affirmatively furthering fair housing.
(e)For purposes of this section, household income levels are as determined by the department as of the most recent decennial census pursuant to the following code sections:
(1)Very low incomes as defined by Section 50105 of the Health and Safety Code.
(2)Lower incomes, as defined by Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
(3)Moderate incomes, as defined by Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(4)Above moderate incomes are those exceeding the moderate-income level of Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(f)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, determinations made by the department, a council of governments, or a city or county pursuant to this section or Section 65584.01, 65584.02, 65584.03, 65584.04, 65584.05, 65584.06, 65584.07, or 65584.08 are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code).
SEC. 2.Section 65584.04 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.04.(a)At least two years prior to a scheduled revision required by Section 65588, each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall develop a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or within the subregion, where applicable pursuant to this section. The methodology shall be consistent with further, and not undermine the intent of, the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(b)(1)No more than six months prior to the development of a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected housing need, each council of governments shall survey each of its member jurisdictions to request, at a minimum, information regarding the factors listed in subdivision (d) that will allow the development of a methodology based upon the factors established in subdivision (d).
(2)The council of governments shall seek to obtain the information in a manner and format that is comparable throughout the region and utilize readily available data to the extent possible.
(3)The information provided by a local government pursuant to this section shall be used, to the extent possible, by the council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, as source information for the methodology developed pursuant to this section. The survey shall state that none of the information received may be used as a basis for reducing the total housing need established for the region pursuant to Section 65584.01.
(4)If the council of governments fails to conduct a survey pursuant to this subdivision, a city, county, or city and county may submit information related to the items listed in subdivision (d) prior to the public comment period provided for in subdivision (c).
(c)Public participation and access shall be required in the development of the methodology and in the process of drafting and adoption of the allocation of the regional housing needs. Participation by organizations other than local jurisdictions and councils of governments shall be solicited in a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community. The proposed methodology, along with any relevant underlying data and assumptions, and an explanation of how information about local government conditions gathered pursuant to subdivision (b) has been used to develop the proposed methodology, and how each of the factors listed in subdivision (d) is incorporated into the methodology, and how the proposed methodology furthers, and does not undermine, the intent of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584, shall be distributed to all cities, counties, any subregions, and members of the public who have made a written request for the proposed methodology. The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall conduct at least one two public hearing hearings to receive oral and written comments on the proposed methodology.
(d)To the extent that sufficient data is available from local governments pursuant to subdivision (b) or other sources, each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, shall include the following factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs:
(1)Each member jurisdictions existing and projected jobs and housing relationship. This shall include data on the number of low-wage jobs within the jurisdiction and how many housing units within the jurisdiction are affordable to workers at those wage levels, as well as how many jobs were added and at what wage levels compared to how many housing units were added and at what income levels in the last planning period.
(2)The opportunities and constraints to development of additional housing in each member jurisdiction, including all of the following:
(A)Lack of capacity for sewer or water service due to federal or state laws, regulations or regulatory actions, or supply and distribution decisions made by a sewer or water service provider other than the local jurisdiction that preclude the jurisdiction from providing necessary infrastructure for additional development during the planning period.
(B)The availability of land suitable for urban development or for conversion to residential use, the availability of underutilized land, and opportunities for infill development and increased residential densities. The council of governments may not limit its consideration of suitable housing sites or land suitable for urban development to existing zoning ordinances and land use restrictions of a locality, but shall consider the potential for increased residential development under alternative zoning ordinances and land use restrictions. The determination of available land suitable for urban development may exclude lands where the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or the Department of Water Resources has determined that the flood management infrastructure designed to protect that land is not adequate to avoid the risk of flooding.
(C)Lands preserved or protected from urban development under existing federal or state programs, or both, designed to protect open space, farmland, environmental habitats, and natural resources on a long-term basis.
(D)County policies to preserve prime agricultural land, as defined pursuant to Section 56064, within an unincorporated area.
(3)The distribution of household growth assumed for purposes of a comparable period of regional transportation plans and opportunities to maximize the use of public transportation and existing transportation infrastructure.
(4)The market existing and projected demand for housing. housing at each of the income levels listed in subdivision (e) of Section 65584.
(5)Agreements between a county and cities in a county to direct growth toward incorporated areas of the county.
(6)The loss of units contained in assisted housing developments, as defined in paragraph (9) of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, that changed to non-low-income use through mortgage prepayment, subsidy contract expirations, or termination of use restrictions.
(7)High-housing cost burdens.(7)The percentage of existing households at each of the income levels listed in subdivision (e) of Section 65584 that are paying more than 30% and more than 50% of their income in rent.
(8)The rate of overcrowding.
(8)(9)The housing needs of farmworkers.
(9)(10)The housing needs generated by the presence of a private university or a campus of the California State University or the University of California within any member jurisdiction.
(10)(11)Any other factors adopted by the council of governments. governments, provided that the council of governments specifies which of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65594 that each additional factor is necessary to further.
(e)The council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall explain in writing how each of the factors described in subdivision (d) was incorporated into the methodology and how the methodology is consistent with furthers, and does not undermine, the intent of subdivision (d) of Section 65584. The methodology may include numerical weighting.
(f)Any ordinance, policy, voter-approved measure, or standard of a city or county that directly or indirectly limits the number of residential building permits issued by a city or county shall not be a justification for a determination or a reduction in the share of a city or county of the regional housing need.
(g)In addition to the factors identified pursuant to subdivision (d), the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall identify any existing local, regional, or state incentives, such as a priority for funding or other incentives available to those local governments that are willing to accept a higher share than proposed in the draft allocation to those local governments by the council of governments or delegate subregion pursuant to Section 65584.05.(h)(g)Following the conclusion of the 60-day public comment period described in subdivision (c) on the proposed allocation methodology, and after making any revisions deemed appropriate by the council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, as a result of comments received during the public comment period, each council of governments, or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall adopt submit the draft allocation methodology to the department. Within 60 days, the department shall determine whether or not the methodology furthers, and does not undermine, the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(h)Following the receipt of the departments determination, the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall make any necessary changes and adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology and provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, or delegate subregion as applicable, and to the department.
(i)(1)It is the intent of the Legislature that housing planning be coordinated and integrated with the regional transportation plan. To achieve this goal, the allocation plan shall allocate housing units within the region consistent with the development pattern included in the sustainable communities strategy. Nothing in this consistency requirement shall limit the application of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (d).
(2)The final allocation plan shall ensure that the total regional housing need, by income category, as determined under Section 65584, is maintained, and that each jurisdiction in the region receive an allocation of units for low- and very low income households.
(3)The resolution approving the final housing need allocation plan shall demonstrate that the plan is consistent with the sustainable communities strategy in the regional transportation plan. plan and furthers, and does not undermine, the intent of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
SEC. 3.Section 65584.05 of the Government Code is amended to read:65584.05.(a)At least one and one-half years prior to the scheduled revision required by Section 65588, each council of governments and delegate subregion, as applicable, shall distribute a draft allocation of regional housing needs to each local government in the region or subregion, where applicable, based on the methodology adopted pursuant to Section 65584.04. The draft allocation shall include the underlying data and methodology on which the allocation is based. based, and a statement as to how it furthers, and does not undermine, the intent of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584. It is the intent of the Legislature that the draft allocation should be distributed prior to the completion of the update of the applicable regional transportation plan. The draft allocation shall distribute to localities and subregions, if any, within the region the entire regional housing need determined pursuant to Section 65584.01 or within subregions, as applicable, the subregions entire share of the regional housing need determined pursuant to Section 65584.03.
(b)Within 60 days following receipt of the draft allocation, a local government may request from the council of governments or the delegate subregion, as applicable, a revision of its share of the regional housing need need. In addition, a housing organization may request from the council of governments or the delegate subregion, as applicable, a revision of the share of the regional housing need allocated to one or more local government. These requests shall be in accordance with the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 and with the factors described in paragraphs (1) to (9), inclusive, of subdivision (d) of Section 65584.04, including any information submitted by the local government or governments to the council of governments pursuant to subdivision (b) of that section. The request for a revised share shall be based upon comparable data available for all affected jurisdictions and accepted planning methodology, and supported by adequate documentation. documentation, and shall include a statement as to how it furthers, and does not undermine, the intent of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65594. A request for a revised share pursuant to this subdivision shall be consistent with, and not to the detriment of, the development pattern in an applicable sustainable communities strategy developed pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 65080.
(c)Within 60 days after the request submitted pursuant to subdivision (b), the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall accept the proposed revision, modify its earlier determination, or indicate, based upon the information and methodology described in Section 65584.04, why the proposed revision is inconsistent with the regional housing need. need and does not further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(d)If the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, does not accept the proposed revised share or modify the revised share to the satisfaction of the requesting party, the local government or the housing organization may appeal its the draft allocation to the department based upon either or both of the following criteria:
(1)The council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, failed to adequately consider the information submitted pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 65584.04, or a significant and unforeseen change in circumstances has occurred in the local jurisdiction or jurisdictions that merits a revision of the information submitted pursuant to that subdivision.
(2)The council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, failed to determine its the share of the regional housing need in accordance with the information described in, and the methodology established pursuant to, Section 65584.04. 65584.04, and in a manner that furthers, and does not undermine, the intent of the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584.
(e)The council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, department shall conduct public hearings to hear all appeals within 60 days after the date established to file appeals. The local government or housing organization shall be notified within 10 days by certified mail, return receipt requested, of at least one public hearing on its appeal. The date of the hearing shall be at least 30 days and not more than 35 days after the date of the notification. Before taking action on an appeal, the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, department shall consider all comments, recommendations, and available data based on accepted planning methodologies submitted by the appellant. The final action of the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, department on an appeal shall be in writing and shall include information and other evidence explaining written findings, supported by a preponderance of the evidence on the record, as to how its action is consistent with this article. The final action on an appeal may require the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, to adjust the allocation of a one or more local government governments that is are not the subject of an appeal.
(f)The council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall issue a proposed final allocation within 45 days after the completion of the 60-day period for hearing appeals. appeals, taking into account the departments actions on all appeals. The proposed final allocation plan shall include responses to all comments received on the proposed draft allocation and reasons for any significant revisions included in the final allocation.
(g)In the proposed final allocation plan, the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall adjust allocations to local governments based upon the results of the revision request process and the appeals process specified in this section. If the adjustments total 7 percent or less of the regional housing need determined pursuant to Section 65584.01, or, as applicable, total 7 percent or less of the subregions share of the regional housing need as determined pursuant to Section 65584.03, then the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall distribute the adjustments proportionally to all local governments. If the adjustments total more than 7 percent of the regional housing need, then the council of governments or delegate subregion, as applicable, shall develop a methodology to distribute the amount greater than the 7 percent to local governments. In no event shall the total distribution of housing need equal less than the regional housing need, as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01, nor shall the subregional distribution of housing need equal less than its share of the regional housing need as determined pursuant to Section 65584.03. Two or more local governments may agree to an alternate distribution of appealed housing allocations between the affected local governments. If two or more local governments agree to an alternative distribution of appealed housing allocations that maintains the total housing need originally assigned to these communities, then the council of governments shall include the alternative distribution in the final allocation plan.
(h)Within 45 days after the issuance of the proposed final allocation plan by the council of governments and each delegate subregion, as applicable, the council of governments shall hold a public hearing to adopt a final allocation plan. To the extent that the final allocation plan fully allocates the regional share of statewide housing need, as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01, 65584.01 and has taken into account the departments actions on all appeals, the council of governments shall have final authority to determine the distribution of the regions existing and projected housing need as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01. The council of governments shall submit its final allocation plan to the department within three days of adoption. Within 60 days after the departments receipt of the final allocation plan adopted by the council of governments, the department shall determine whether or not the final allocation plan is consistent with the existing and projected housing need for the region, as determined pursuant to Section 65584.01. The department may revise the determination of the council of governments if necessary to obtain this consistency.
(i)Any authority of the council of governments to review and revise the share of a city or county of the regional housing need under this section shall not constitute authority to revise, approve, or disapprove the manner in which the share of the city or county of the regional housing need is implemented through its housing program.
(j)For purposes of this section, housing organization means a nonproject organization whose mission includes providing or advocating for increased access to housing for low-income households.
SEC. 4.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
SECTION 1.It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would make changes to the process for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to the jurisdictions within a region to ensure that the distribution is consistent with equity, fair housing, and climate goals and that every jurisdiction is contributing to the attainment of state housing goals at all income levels.It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would make changes to the process for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to the jurisdictions within a region to ensure that the distribution is consistent with equity, fair housing, and climate goals and that every jurisdiction is contributing to the attainment of state housing goals at all income levels.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2018 | Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 989, Statutes of 2018. |
| Sep 30, 2018 | Approved by the Governor. |
| Sep 10, 2018 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m. |
| Aug 30, 2018 | Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. |
| Aug 29, 2018 | In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. |
| Aug 29, 2018 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. |
| Aug 27, 2018 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Aug 24, 2018 | Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading. |
| Aug 17, 2018 | From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 16). |
| Aug 6, 2018 | In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file. |
| Jun 27, 2018 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 4.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Jun 20, 2018 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H. |
| Jun 13, 2018 | Referred to Com. on T. & H. |
| Jun 4, 2018 | In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. |
| May 31, 2018 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. |
| May 29, 2018 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| May 25, 2018 | From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 25). |
| May 9, 2018 | In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file. |
| Apr 26, 2018 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Apr 18, 2018 | Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. |
| Apr 17, 2018 | Read second time and amended. |
| Apr 16, 2018 | From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (April 11). |
| Mar 20, 2018 | Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D. |
| Mar 19, 2018 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. Read second time and amended. |
| Mar 19, 2018 | Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and L. GOV. |
| Jan 5, 2018 | From printer. May be heard in committee February 4. |
| Jan 4, 2018 | Read first time. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2018 | AB 1771 BLOOM Concurrence in Senate Amendments | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Aug 29, 2018 | Assembly 3rd Reading AB1771 Bloom By Wiener | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Aug 16, 2018 | Do pass | Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Aug 6, 2018 | Placed on suspense file | Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Jun 26, 2018 | Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Senate Standing Committee on Transportation and Housing |
Passed |
|
| May 31, 2018 | AB 1771 BLOOM Assembly Third Reading | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| May 25, 2018 | Do pass as amended. | Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Apr 25, 2018 | Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Assembly Standing Committee on Local Government |
Passed |
|
| Apr 11, 2018 | Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Local Government] | Assembly Standing Committee on Housing and Community Development |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| American Planning Association | ** Support | Apr 24, 2018 |
| Association Of Bay Area Governments | ** Against | Aug 27, 2018 |
| Bay Area Council | ** Support | Aug 27, 2018 |
| California Association Of Councils Of Governments | ** Against | Apr 24, 2018 |
| California Bicycle Coalition | ** Support | Aug 27, 2018 |
| California Building Industry Association | ** Against | Apr 24, 2018 |
| California Housing Consortium | ** Support | Aug 27, 2018 |
| California Housing Partnership Corporation | ** Support | Aug 27, 2018 |
| California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation | ** Support | Aug 27, 2018 |
| City of Santa Monica | ** Support | Aug 27, 2018 |
| City of West Hollywood | ** Support | Aug 27, 2018 |
| Disability Rights California | ** Support | Aug 27, 2018 |
| Housing California | ** Support | Aug 27, 2018 |
| Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California | ** Support | Aug 27, 2018 |
| Nonprofit Housing Association Northern California | * Support | Apr 25, 2018 |
| Sacramento Area Council Of Governments | ** Against | Aug 27, 2018 |
| western center on law and poverty | ** Support | Aug 27, 2018 |
CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
CSA1 Bill Id:AB 1771
Author:(Bloom)
As Amended Ver:August 24, 2018
Majority vote
ASSEMBLY: | 48-27 | (May 31, 2018) | SENATE: | 24-14 | (August 29, 2018) |
Original Committee Reference: H. & C.D.
SUMMARY: Makes changes to the regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) plan objectives, methodology, distribution, and appeals process. Specifically, this bill:
- Removes the existing law requirement for Council of Governments (COGs) to seek the advice of Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) when preparing their RHNA allocation plans and instead requires COGs to consult with HCD when developing the methodology for the RHNA allocation.
- Revises the statutory objectives for the RHNA allocation plan as follows:
- Adds to the existing objective of promoting infill development and socioeconomic equity, achievement of the region's greenhouse gas reduction targets;
- Adds to the existing objective requiring promotion of an improved intraregional jobs-housing relationship, provisions requiring inclusion of an improved balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction;
- Adds a new objective of affirmatively furthering fair housing, as defined; and
- Adds to the data COGs must provide to HCD, the loss of units during a state of emergency during the prior planning period that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the analysis.
- Adds to the existing requirement for a COG to survey its member jurisdictions no more than six months prior to development of a proposed methodology, a requirement to compile information for development of a methodology based on the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice or Assessment of Fair Housing completed by any city or county within the COG's jurisdiction. Requires COGs to electronically report the results of this survey.
- Adds to the information A COG must distribute publicly, an explanation of how the methodology furthers the statutory objectives. Requires the COG to publish this information on its Web site.
- Adds the following data requirements to the COG methodology:
- Requires the methodology to further the statutory objectives, rather than be consistent with them;
- Adds, to the list of factors used to develop the methodology, a requirement to include an estimate, based on readily available data, of the number of low-wage jobs within the jurisdiction and how many housing units within the jurisdiction are affordable to workers at those wage levels, as well as an estimate, based on readily available data, of projected job growth and projected household growth by income level within each member jurisdiction during this planning period;
- Adds to the list of opportunities and constraints to development of additional housing, to add land within an unincorporated area zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation that is subject to a local voter-approved ballot measure prohibiting or restricting its conversion to non-agricultural uses;
- Revises one of the factors used to develop the methodology to require the percentage of existing households at each income level that are paying more than 30% and more than 50% of their income in rent;
- Adds to the list of factors used to develop the methodology, the rate of overcrowding, the loss of units during a state of emergency during the prior planning period that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the analysis, and the region's greenhouse gas reduction targets;
- Requires the COG to specify which of the objectives each additional factor is necessary to further, should any other factors be adopted by the COG. Allows a COG to adopt additional factors only if they do not undermine the objectives, are applied equally across all household income levels, and the COG makes a finding that the factor is necessary to address significant health and safety concerns; and
- Requires the COG to post its explanation of how each of the factors was incorporated into the methodology, how the methodology furthers the statutory objectives, and any other supporting materials used in determining the methodology, on its Web site.
- Requires the COG, after the public comment period on the proposed allocation methodology, and after making any revisions as a result of public comments and consultation with HCD, to post the draft allocation methodology on its Web site and submit it to HCD. HCD must determine within 60 days whether the methodology furthers, and does not undermine, the statutory objectives.
- Requires the COG, if HCD determines that the methodology does not further the statutory objectives, to consider HCD's findings and take one of the following actions:
- Revise the methodology to further the statutory objectives and adopt a final RHNA methodology.
- Adopt the RHNA methodology without revisions and include within its resolution of adoption written findings, supported by substantial evidence, as to why it believes the methodology furthers the statutory objectives despite HCD's findings.
- Provides that if HCD's findings are not available within the statutory time limits, the COG may act without them.
- Requires the COG to provide notice of the adoption of the final methodology to HCD and the jurisdictions within the region, and to publish the adopted allocation methodology, along with its resolution and any adopted written findings, on its Web site.
- Authorizes HCD to, within 90 days, review the adopted methodology and report its findings to the COG.
- Requires a COG to distribute the draft RHNA allocation to HCD, and to publish it on the COG's Web site, in addition to distributing it to the localities in its jurisdiction.
- Allows a local government, within 45 days of the draft RHNA allocation being distributed, to appeal to the COG for a revision of the proposed RHNA allocation. The appeal must include a statement as to why the revision is necessary to further the statutory objectives. The appeal must be limited to:
- Failure to consider the survey information submitted by local governments in the region to inform the methodology;
- Failure to determine the share of RHNA pursuant to the methodology defined in state law and in a manner that furthers and does not undermine the statutory objectives;
- Significant and unforeseen changes in circumstances that occurred in the local jurisdiction or jurisdictions that merits a revision of the information submitted by local governments to inform the RHNA. Appeals on this basis shall only be made by the jurisdiction or jurisdictions where the change in circumstances has occurred.
- Requires a COG to notify all other local governments in the region, as well as HCD, of all appeals, and to make all materials related to the appeals available on a public Web site. Provides that local governments and HCD have 45 days to comment on one or more appeals. If no appeals are filed, the draft allocation shall be deemed final.
- Requires the COG to conduct one public hearing to consider all appeals no later than 30 days after the close of the comment period after providing local governments in the region at least 21 days' notice.
- Requires the COG to specify how the appeal request does not further the objectives, should the COG indicate that the proposed revision is inconsistent with the RHNA. Specifies that the final action may require the COG, as applicable, to adjust the allocation of one or more (rather than just one) local governments that are not the subject of the appeal.
- Requires the COG, no later than 45 days after the hearing, to do both of the following:
- Make a final determination that either accepts, rejects, or modifies each appeal for a revised share of the RHNA that includes written findings as to how the determination is necessary to the further statutory objectives; and
- Issue a final allocation plan.
- Deletes the authority of two local governments to agree to an alternative distribution of appealed housing allocations between the affected local governments.
- Provides that statutory changes enacted after the date HCD issues a final determination shall not be a basis for a revision of the final determination.
The Senate amendments:
- Eliminate the requirement in existing law that COGS consult with HCD before when preparing their RHNA allocation plans and instead requires COGs to consult with HCD when developing the methodology for the RHNA allocation.
- Add a definition of "affirmatively furthering fair housing."
- Revises the statutory objectives for the RHNA allocation plan to add the data COGs must provide to HCD, the loss of units during a state of emergency during the prior planning period that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the analysis.
- Adds to the information A COG must distribute publicly, an explanation of how the methodology furthers the statutory objectives. Requires the COG to publish this information on its Web site.
- Makes various other technical changes.
- Adds amendments to avoid chaptering issues with SB 828 (Wiener) of the current legislative session.
FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Committee on Appropriations: Unknown state mandated costs to COGs. The state does not need to reimburse these costs because locals have the authority to levy fees to cover them.
COMMENTS:
Background: Housing element law requires local governments to adequately plan to meet their existing and projected housing needs including their share of the regional housing need. The housing element update process addresses the statewide concern of providing "decent housing and a suitable living environment for every California family," in part by facilitating increases in housing supply to accommodate the needs of the state's population and its growth. The law recognizes the most critical decisions regarding housing development occur at the local level within the context of the general plan. In order for the private sector to adequately address housing needs and demand, local governments must regularly update their general plans, zoning, and development standards to provide opportunities for, and not unduly constrain, housing development for all income groups.
Regional housing needs assessment (RHNA) for each city and county constitute a fundamental basis for housing element updates. The state projects new RHNA numbers every eight years, or in some rural areas every five years. RHNA for each city and county is a projection of additional housing units needed to accommodate existing households and projected household growth of all income levels by the end of the housing element planning period.
RHNAs establish minimum housing development capacity that cities and counties are to make available via their land use powers to accommodate growth within a planning period. RHNAs are assigned by four income categories as guideposts for each community to develop a mix of housing types for all economic segments of the population. The process is also known as "fair share" planning, as shares of the regional housing need are determined for constituent cities and counties of the affected region of the housing element update cycle. Regions are represented by COGs or counties, which are charged with preparing RHNA plans.
In consultation with each COG, HCD determines the housing needs for each region using a demographic method based on Department of Financing (DOF) population projections. While HCD forwards projections for the region, the distribution of the need within the region to individual cities and counties is subject to determination by the COG. Two years prior to a housing element revision, the COG develops a methodology for distributing the RNHA to jurisdictions within the region. The methodology must consider certain factors spelled out in statute. Local jurisdictions provide data to the COG that is used in the methodology to determine the distribution of housing need within the region. COGs allocate the RHNA to their city and county members in a draft allocation plan and each city and county has an opportunity to request revision of their needs allocation by the COG. The COG may revise the initial allocations, subject to maintaining the total regional need.
The methodology is required to consider the existing and projected jobs housing relationship; the opportunities and constraints to building housing in a jurisdiction; a comparison between household growth and regional transportation plans; market demand for housing; agreements to direct growth to unincorporated areas; the loss of assisted housing units due to expiring covenants or contracts; the housing needs of farmworkers; and housing generated by universities. In addition, the COG can consider any other factors it chooses.
The RNHA process has been criticized as being a political rather than a data driven process. COGs distribute the allocation by both the supporting data but also in some cases based on which jurisdictions are willing accept housing units. A component of the methodology used to determine the allocation of RNHA is a jurisdiction's willingness to accept a higher share of the proposed share of the RNHA. The Haas Institute at UC Berkeley published a study, "Unfair Share" Racial Disparities and Regional Housing Needs Allocation in the Bay Area," which found a relationship between the number of units allocated, adjusted for population size, and the racial composition of the city. Local governments with higher percentages of white residents were more likely to have received lower allocations of moderate and lower income housing.
SB 35 (Wiener), Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017, required that cities and counties streamline housing developments that include either 10% of units at or below 80% of AMI or 50% units at or below 80% of AMI. This new requirement has added additional weight to the RNHA process because the trigger for whether or not a jurisdiction must streamline is based on whether or not they have met their RNHA numbers for above moderate income (120% of AMI or above) or lower income (80% of AMI or below). Most jurisdictions have not met their lower income RNHA and are subject to streamlining if the developer meets the requirements of the bill, including that 50% of the units are restricted to lower income households.
- The author states that this bill aims to address concerns that RHNA distributions are often influenced by regional politics rather than housing need. Key provisions include:
- Furthering RHNA objectives. This bill requires the COG methodology to further the statutory RHNA objectives, rather than to just be consistent with them. It also requires COGs to publicly explain how each of the factors was incorporated into the methodology and how the methodology furthers the statutory objectives.
- Equity. This bill adds a new statutory objective to affirmatively further fair housing.
- Transparency. This bill requires COGs to post all RHNA information on a public website to help ensure it is available to all affected local governments and all interested stakeholders.
- Housing need, not housing market. This bill eliminates the existing law requirement to include the market demand for housing as a factor in developing the methodology. The sponsor states that factors such as housing need, housing burden, overcrowding, and jobs/housing fit are more objective and appropriate measures.
- Justification of RHNA appeals. This bill requires a locality, if it disagrees with its RHNA allocation, to submit a request for a revision that includes a statement as to why the proposed allocation is not appropriate and why a revision is necessary to further the statutory objectives.
- Banning RHNA swaps. This bill deletes the authority of two local governments to agree to an alternative distribution of appealed housing allocations between the affected local governments.
This bill removes the existing law requirement for COGs to consult with HCD when preparing their RHNA plans, and instead requires COGs to consult with HCD when developing the methodology to be used in the allocation. It also requires HCD to determine, within 60 days, whether the methodology furthers the statutory objectives. The author states that requiring COGs to work with HCD in developing the methodology is intended to ensure against HCD finding issues at the end of the process.
Analysis Prepared by: Lisa Engel / H. & C.D. / (916) 319-2085 FN: 0005169
Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | AB |
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 1771
:
SENATE TRANS. & HOUSING COMMITTEE: 8-4, 6/26/18
AYES: Beall, Allen, Dodd, Galgiani, McGuire, Roth, Skinner, Wiener
NOES: Cannella, Gaines, Morrell, Vidak
NO VOTE RECORDED: Wieckowski
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 5-2, 8/16/18
AYES: Portantino, Beall, Bradford, Hill, Wiener
NOES: Bates, Nielsen
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 48-27, 5/31/18 - See last page for vote
SOURCE: California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
Western Center on Law and Poverty
DIGEST:
This bill makes changes to the regional housing needs assessment (RHNA) plan objectives, methodology, and distribution process.
Senate Floor Amendments of 8/24/18 address chaptering out issues, facilitate implementation, and address stakeholder concerns.
Existing law:
- Requires every city and county to prepare and adopt a general plan, including a housing element, to guide the future growth of a community. The housing element must identify and analyze existing and projected housing needs, identify adequate sites with appropriate zoning to meet the housing needs of all income segments of the community, and ensure that regulatory systems provide opportunities for, and do not unduly constrain, housing development.
- Requires local governments located within the territory of a metropolitan planning organization (MPO) to revise their housing elements every eight years, following the adoption of every other regional transportation plan. Local governments in rural non-MPO regions must revise their housing elements every five years.
- Requires each community’s fair share of housing to be determined through the regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) process, as follows:
- The Department of Finance and the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) develop regional housing needs estimates;
- Councils of government (COGs) allocate housing within each region based on these estimates (where a COG does not exist, HCD makes the determinations); and,
- Cities and counties incorporate their allocations into their housing elements.
- Requires COGs to provide specified data assumptions to HCD from each COG’s projections.
- Requires the housing element to contain an assessment of housing needs and an inventory of resources and constraints relevant to meeting those needs.
- Requires a locality’s inventory of land suitable for residential development to be used to identify sites that can be developed for housing within the planning period and that are sufficient to provide for the locality’s share of the regional housing need for all income levels. Requires the inventory to provide certain information on each site, such as the general plan designation and zoning of each site and available infrastructure.
- Requires the inventory of land to specify the additional development potential for each non-vacant site within the planning period and an explanation of the methodology used to determine the development potential.
- Requires, where the inventory of sites does not identify adequate sites to accommodate the need for groups of all household income levels, rezoning of those sites to be completed in a specified time period. Requires this rezoning to accommodate 100% of the need for housing for very low and low-income households for which site capacity has not been identified in the inventory of sites on sites that shall be zoned to permit rental multifamily residential housing by right during the planning period.
- Prohibits a local jurisdiction from reducing or permitting the reduction of the residential density, or from allowing development at a lower residential density for any parcel, unless the jurisdiction makes specified written findings.
This bill:
- Removes the existing law requirement for COGs to seek the advice of HCD when preparing their RHNA allocation plans and instead requires COGs to consult with HCD when developing the methodology for the RHNA allocation.
- Revises the statutory objectives for the RHNA allocation plan as follows:
- Adds, to the existing objective of promoting infill development and socioeconomic equity, achievement of the region’s greenhouse gas reduction targets.
- Adds, to the existing objective requiring promotion of an improved intraregional jobs-housing relationship, provisions requiring inclusion of an improved balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction.
- Adds a new objective of affirmatively furthering fair housing, as defined.
- Adds, to the data COGs must provide to HCD, the loss of units during a state of emergency during the prior planning period that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the analysis.
- Adds, to the existing requirement for a COG to survey its member jurisdictions no more than six months prior to development of a proposed methodology, a requirement to compile information for development of a methodology based on the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice or Assessment of Fair Housing completed by any city or county within the COG’s jurisdiction. Requires COGs to electronically report the results of this survey.
- Adds to the information A COG must distribute publicly, an explanation of how the methodology furthers the statutory objectives. Requires the COG to publish this information on its Web site.
- Adds the following data requirements to the COG methodology:
- Requires the methodology to further the statutory objectives, rather than be consistent with them.
- Adds, to the list of factors used to develop the methodology, a requirement to include an estimate, based on readily available data, of the number of low-wage jobs within the jurisdiction and how many housing units within the jurisdiction are affordable to workers at those wage levels, as well as an estimate, based on readily available data, of projected job growth and projected household growth by income level within each member jurisdiction during this planning period.
- Adds to the list of opportunities and constraints to development of additional housing, to add land within an unincorporated area zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation that is subject to a local voter-approved ballot measure prohibiting or restricting its conversion to non-agricultural uses.
- Revises one of the factors used to develop the methodology to require the percentage of existing households at each income level that are paying more than 30% and more than 50% of their income in rent.
- Adds to the list of factors used to develop the methodology, the rate of overcrowding, the loss of units during a state of emergency during the prior planning period that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the analysis, and the region’s greenhouse gas reduction targets.
- Requires the COG to specify which of the objectives each additional factor is necessary to further, should any other factors be adopted by the COG. Allows a COG to adopt additional factors only if they do not undermine the objectives, are applied equally across all household income levels, and the COG makes a finding that the factor is necessary to address significant health and safety concerns.
- Requires the COG to post its explanation of how each of the factors was incorporated into the methodology, how the methodology furthers the statutory objectives, and any other supporting materials used in determining the methodology, on its Web site.
- Requires the COG, after the public comment period on the proposed allocation methodology, and after making any revisions as a result of public comments and consultation with HCD, to post the draft allocation methodology on its Web site and submit it to HCD. HCD must determine within 60 days whether the methodology furthers, and does not undermine, the statutory objectives.
- Requires the COG, if HCD determines that the methodology does not further the statutory objectives, to consider HCD’s findings and take one of the following actions:
- Revise the methodology to further the statutory objectives and adopt a final RHNA methodology.
- Adopt the RHNA methodology without revisions and include within its resolution of adoption written findings, supported by substantial evidence, as to why it believes the methodology furthers the statutory objectives despite HCD’s findings.
- Provides that if HCD’s findings are not available within the statutory time limits, the COG may act without them.
- Requires the COG to provide notice of the adoption of the final methodology to HCD and the jurisdictions within the region, and to publish the adopted allocation methodology, along with its resolution and any adopted written findings, on its Web site.
- Authorizes HCD to, within 90 days, review the adopted methodology and report its findings to the COG.
- Requires a COG to distribute the draft RHNA allocation to HCD, and to publish it on the COG’s Web site, in addition to distributing it to the localities in its jurisdiction.
- Allows a local government, within 45 days of the draft RHNA allocation being distributed, to appeal to the COG for a revision of the proposed RHNA allocation. The appeal must include a statement as to why the revision is necessary to further the statutory objectives. The appeal must be limited to:
- Failure to consider the survey information submitted by local governments in the region to inform the methodology.
- Failure to determine the share of RHNA pursuant to the methodology defined in state law and in a manner that furthers and does not undermine the statutory objectives.
- Significant and unforeseen changes in circumstances that occurred in the local jurisdiction or jurisdictions that merits a revision of the information submitted by local governments to inform the RHNA. Appeals on this basis shall only be made by the jurisdiction or jurisdictions where the change in circumstances has occurred.
- Requires a COG to notify all other local governments in the region, as well as HCD, of all appeals, and to make all materials related to the appeals available on a public Web site. Provides that local governments and HCD have 45 days to comment on one or more appeals. If no appeals are filed, the draft allocation shall be deemed final.
- Requires the COG to conduct one public hearing to consider all appeals no later than 30 days after the close of the comment period after providing local governments in the region at least 21 days’ notice.
- Requires the COG to specify how the appeal request does not further the objectives, should the COG indicate that the proposed revision is inconsistent with the RHNA. Specifies that the final action may require the COG, as applicable, to adjust the allocation of one or more (rather than just one) local governments that are not the subject of the appeal.
- Requires the COG, no later than 45 days after the hearing, to do both of the following:
- Make a final determination that either accepts, rejects, or modifies each appeal for a revised share of the RHNA that includes written findings as to how the determination is necessary to the further statutory objectives.
- Issue a final allocation plan.
- Deletes the authority of two local governments to agree to an alternative distribution of appealed housing allocations between the affected local governments.
- Provides that statutory changes enacted after the date HCD issues a final determination shall not be a basis for a revision of the final determination.
Background
Until very recently, communities without an approved housing element have faced limited ramifications. Last year, however, the Legislature passed a comprehensive package of housing bills, which was signed into law by Governor Brown on September 29, 2017. This package included a number of bills aimed at strengthening housing element law, which are in the process of being implemented.
Comments
- Purpose. The author states that while RHNA distribution is supposed to be data-driven, unfortunately it is all too often influenced heavily by regional politics, resulting in low allocations to wealthier and often job-rich jurisdictions that could accommodate far more housing, particularly multifamily housing. The state has a number of laws on the books designed to ensure that housing gets built, but these laws generally only protect projects proposed on sites zoned for housing. When a jurisdiction gets a low RHNA number and thus has to zone very little land for housing, it frustrates the application of these laws and effectively allows that jurisdiction to remain off limits to housing construction. When the RHNA process becomes mired in politics, it can reinforce patterns of exclusion rather than achieving the fair housing and equity goals that are the fundamental underpinning of the statute. This bill aims to establish a more equitable, data-driven distribution of the housing need, ensure greater transparency in the distribution process, and provide additional oversight.
- Shining a light. The author states that this bill aims to address concerns that RHNA distributions are often influenced by regional politics rather than housing need. Key provisions include:
- Furthering RHNA objectives. This bill requires the COG methodology to further the statutory RHNA objectives, rather than to just be consistent with them. It also requires COGs to publicly explain how each of the factors was incorporated into the methodology and how the methodology furthers the statutory objectives.
- Equity. This bill adds a new statutory objective to affirmatively further fair housing.
- Transparency. This bill requires COGs to post all RHNA information on a public website to help ensure it is available to all affected local governments and all interested stakeholders.
- Housing need, not housing market. This bill eliminates the existing law requirement to include the market demand for housing as a factor in developing the methodology. The sponsor states that factors such as housing need, housing burden, overcrowding, and jobs/housing fit are more objective and appropriate measures.
- Justification of RHNA appeals. This bill requires a locality, if it disagrees with its RHNA allocation, to submit a request for a revision that includes a statement as to why the proposed allocation is not appropriate and why a revision is necessary to further the statutory objectives.
- Banning RHNA swaps. This bill deletes the authority of two local governments to agree to an alternative distribution of appealed housing allocations between the affected local governments.
- HCD’s role. This bill removes the existing law requirement for COGs to consult with HCD when preparing their RHNA plans, and instead requires COGs to consult with HCD when developing the methodology to be used in the allocation. It also requires HCD to determine, within 60 days, whether the methodology furthers the statutory objectives. The author states that requiring COGs to work with HCD in developing the methodology is intended to ensure against HCD finding issues at the end of the process.
- Local control. This bill includes a number of provisions intended to help preserve a measure of local control. For example, this bill provides that if HCD finds that a COG’s methodology does not further the statutory objectives, the COG may keep the methodology without revisions if it makes written findings justifying its decision. It also allows COGs to apply additional factors unrelated to the statutory objectives if it deems them necessary for health and safety reasons. Additionally, this bill allows a COG to reject an appeal by a locality or to adjust the allocation of one or more localities that are not the subject of an appeal.
- SB 828. Earlier this year, the Senate heard SB 828 (Wiener), another RHNA reform bill. All major conflicts between the two bills have been removed through recent amendments.
Related/Prior Legislation
SB 828 (Wiener, 2018) makes a number of changes to the RHNA process. The bill is on the Assembly Floor.
AB 686 (Santiago, 2018) requires a public agency to administer its programs and activities relating to housing and community development in a manner to affirmatively further fair housing. The bill is pending Concurrence in the Assembly.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: Fiscal Com.: Local:
According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:
- HCD estimates first year implementation costs of up to $463,000, which includes one-time database improvements of $50,000, and ongoing costs of up to $383,000 for two PY of permanent staff to manage workload associated with increased participation in the development and adoption of RHNA methodologies and the appeals of RHNA allocations. (General Fund)
- Unknown, potentially significant local costs for additional workload imposed on COGs related to the development of RHNA allocation methodologies and adopting allocation plans, as specified. Any new costs imposed on COGs or their constituent local governments are not state-reimbursable because local agencies have the authority to charge and adjust planning and permitting fees as necessary to cover administrative costs related to planning mandates.
California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation (co-source)
Western Center on Law and Poverty (co-source)
Bay Area Council
California Bicycle Coalition
California Housing Consortium
California Housing Partnership Corporation
City of Santa Monica
City of West Hollywood
Disability Rights California
Housing California
Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California
OPPOSITION: (Verified 8/24/18)
Association of Bay Area Governments
Sacramento Area Council of Governments
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The sponsors state that this bill will provide for a more data-driven distribution of the housing need, ensure greater transparency in the distribution process, and provide additional oversight to ensure that every local government in the state is planning for enough housing at all income levels.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: Opponents state that this bill weakens COGs and makes it more difficult for COGs to craft a regional housing plan that enjoys broad support and that RHNA decisions should be made at the local level, not mandated in statute.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 48-27, 5/31/18
AYES: Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Berman, Bloom, Bonta, Burke, Caballero, Calderon, Carrillo, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Daly, Eggman, Frazier, Friedman, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gloria, Gonzalez Fletcher, Gray, Grayson, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Kamlager-Dove, Levine, Limón, Low, McCarty, Medina, Mullin, Nazarian, Quirk, Reyes, Rodriguez, Rubio, Salas, Santiago, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Weber, Wood, Rendon
NOES: Acosta, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Brough, Cervantes, Chávez, Chen, Choi, Cunningham, Dahle, Flora, Fong, Gallagher, Harper, Kiley, Lackey, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, Melendez, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Patterson, Steinorth, Voepel, Waldron
NO VOTE RECORDED: Cooper, Muratsuchi, Quirk-Silva
8/27/18 19:30:22
**** END ****
Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | AB |
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 1771
:
SENATE TRANS. & HOUSING COMMITTEE: 8-4, 6/26/18
AYES: Beall, Allen, Dodd, Galgiani, McGuire, Roth, Skinner, Wiener
NOES: Cannella, Gaines, Morrell, Vidak
NO VOTE RECORDED: Wieckowski
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 5-2, 8/16/18
AYES: Portantino, Beall, Bradford, Hill, Wiener
NOES: Bates, Nielsen
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 48-27, 5/31/18 - See last page for vote
SOURCE: California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
Western Center on Law and Poverty
DIGEST:
This bill makes changes to the regional housing needs assessment (RHNA) plan objectives, methodology, and distribution process.
Existing law:
- Requires every city and county to prepare and adopt a general plan, including a housing element, to guide the future growth of a community. The housing element must identify and analyze existing and projected housing needs, identify adequate sites with appropriate zoning to meet the housing needs of all income segments of the community, and ensure that regulatory systems provide opportunities for, and do not unduly constrain, housing development.
- Requires local governments located within the territory of a metropolitan planning organization (MPO) to revise their housing elements every eight years, following the adoption of every other regional transportation plan. Local governments in rural non-MPO regions must revise their housing elements every five years.
- Requires each community’s fair share of housing to be determined through the regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) process, which is composed of three main stages:
- The Department of Finance and the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) develop regional housing needs estimates;
- Councils of government (COGs) allocate housing within each region based on these estimates (where a COG does not exist, HCD makes the determinations); and,
- Cities and counties incorporate their allocations into their housing elements.
- Requires COGs to provide specified data assumptions to HCD from each COG’s projections.
- Requires the housing element to contain an assessment of housing needs and an inventory of resources and constraints relevant to meeting those needs.
- Requires a locality’s inventory of land suitable for residential development to be used to identify sites that can be developed for housing within the planning period and that are sufficient to provide for the locality’s share of the regional housing need for all income levels. Requires the inventory to provide certain information on each site, such as the general plan designation and zoning of each site and available infrastructure.
- Requires the inventory of land to specify the additional development potential for each non-vacant site within the planning period and an explanation of the methodology used to determine the development potential.
- Requires, where the inventory of sites does not identify adequate sites to accommodate the need for groups of all household income levels, rezoning of those sites to be completed in a specified time period. Requires this rezoning to accommodate 100% of the need for housing for very low and low-income households for which site capacity has not been identified in the inventory of sites on sites that shall be zoned to permit rental multifamily residential housing by right during the planning period.
- Prohibits a local jurisdiction from reducing or permitting the reduction of the residential density, or from allowing development at a lower residential density for any parcel, unless the jurisdiction makes specified written findings.
This bill:
- Removes the existing law requirement for COGs to seek the advice of HCD when preparing their RHNA allocation plans and instead requires COGs to consult with HCD when developing the methodology for the RHNA allocation.
- Revises the statutory objectives for the RHNA allocation plan as follows:
- Adds, to the existing objective requiring promotion of an improved intraregional jobs-housing relationship, provisions requiring inclusion of an improved balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction.
- Adds, to the existing objective requiring allocation of a lower proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately high share of households in that income category, provisions requiring an allocation of a higher proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately low share of households in that income category.
- Adds a new objective to increase access to areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents, avoiding displacement and affirmatively furthering fair housing. Defines these as areas that provide pathways to better lives, including through health, education, and employment.
- Adds to the information that must be distributed publicly, a requirement to explain how the methodology furthers the statutory objectives. Requires the information to be published on the COG’s Web site.
- Adds the following data requirements to the COG methodology:
- Requires the methodology to further the statutory objectives, rather than be consistent with them.
- Adds, to the list of factors used to develop the methodology, a requirement to include data on the number of low-wage jobs within the jurisdiction, how many housing units within the jurisdiction are affordable to workers at those wage levels, and how many jobs were added at what wage levels compared to how many housing units were added and at what income levels, in the last planning period.
- Revises one of the factors used to develop the methodology to require the percentage of existing households at each income level that are paying more than 30% and more than 50% of their income in rent.
- Adds a new factor, the rate of overcrowding.
- Requires the COG to specify which of the objectives each additional factor is necessary to further, should any other factors be adopted by the COG. The COG may only adopt additional factors if they do not undermine the objectives and the COG makes a finding that the factor is necessary to address specific health and safety concerns.
- Requires the COG to post its explanation of how each of the factors was incorporated into the methodology, and how the methodology furthers the statutory objectives, on its Web site.
- Requires the COG, after the public comment period on the proposed allocation methodology, and after making any revisions as a result of public comments and consultation with HCD, to post the draft allocation methodology on its website and submit it to HCD. HCD must determine within 60 days whether the methodology furthers, and does not undermine, the statutory objectives.
- Requires the COG, if HCD determines that the methodology is not consistent with the statutory objectives, to take one of the following actions:
- Revise the methodology pursuant HCD’s findings and adopt a final RHNA methodology.
- Adopt a final RHNA methodology without revisions and include within its resolution of adoption written findings as to why it believes the methodology is consistent with the statutory objectives despite HCD’s findings.
- Requires the COG to provide notice of the adoption of the final methodology to HCD and the jurisdictions within the region, and to post notice on its Web site.
- Allows a local government, within 45 days of the draft RHNA allocation being distributed, to appeal to the COG for a revision of the proposed RHNA allocation. The appeal must include a statement as to why the revision is necessary to further the statutory objectives. The appeal must be limited to:
- Failure to consider the survey information submitted by local governments in the region to inform the methodology.
- Significant and unforeseen changes in circumstances that occurred in the local jurisdiction or jurisdictions that merits a revision of the information submitted by local governments to inform the RHNA.
- Failure to determine the share of RHNA pursuant to the methodology defined in state law and in a manner that furthers and does not undermine the statutory objectives.
- Requires a COG to notify all other local governments in the region, as well as HCD, of all appeals, and to make all materials related to the appeals available on a public website. Provides that local governments and HCD have 45 days to comment on one or more appeals. If no appeals are filed, the draft allocation shall be deemed final.
- Requires the COG to conduct one public hearing to consider all appeals no later than 30 days after the close of the comment period after providing local governments in the region at least 21 days’ notice.
- Requires the COG to specify how the appeal request does not further the objectives, should the COG indicate that the proposed revision is inconsistent with the RHNA. Specifies that the final action may require the COG, as applicable, to adjust the allocation of one or more (rather than just one) local governments that are not the subject of the appeal.
- Requires the COG, no later than 45 days after the hearing, to do both of the following:
- Make a final determination that either accepts, rejects, or modifies each appeal for a revised share of the RHNA that includes written findings as to how the determination is necessary to the further statutory objectives.
- Issue a final allocation plan.
- Deletes the authority of two local governments to agree to an alternative distribution of appealed housing allocations between the affected local governments.
Background
Until very recently, communities without an approved housing element have faced limited ramifications. Last year, however, the Legislature passed a comprehensive package of housing bills, which was signed into law by Governor Brown on September 29, 2017. This package included a number of bills aimed at strengthening housing element law, which are in the process of being implemented.
Comments
- Purpose. The author states that while RHNA distribution is supposed to be data-driven, unfortunately it is all too often influenced heavily by regional politics, resulting in low allocations to wealthier and often job-rich jurisdictions that could accommodate far more housing, particularly multifamily housing. The state has a number of laws on the books designed to ensure that housing gets built, but these laws generally only protect projects proposed on sites zoned for housing. When a jurisdiction gets a low RHNA number and thus has to zone very little land for housing, it frustrates the application of these laws and effectively allows that jurisdiction to remain off limits to housing construction. When the RHNA process becomes mired in politics, it can reinforce patterns of exclusion rather than achieving the fair housing and equity goals that are the fundamental underpinning of the statute. This bill aims to establish a more equitable, data-driven distribution of the housing need, ensure greater transparency in the distribution process, and provide additional oversight.
- Shining a light. The author states that this bill aims to address concerns that RHNA distributions are often influenced by regional politics rather than housing need. Key provisions include:
- Furthering RHNA objectives. This bill requires the COG methodology to further the statutory RHNA objectives, rather than to just be consistent with them. It also requires COGs to publicly explain how each of the factors was incorporated into the methodology and how the methodology furthers the statutory objectives.
- Equity. This bill adds a new statutory objective to increase access to areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents, avoiding displacement and affirmatively furthering fair housing.
- Transparency. This bill requires COGs to post all RHNA information on a public website to help ensure it is available to all affected local governments and all interested stakeholders.
- Housing need, not housing market. This bill eliminates the existing law requirement to include the market demand for housing as a factor in developing the methodology. The sponsor states that factors such as housing need, housing burden, overcrowding, and jobs/housing fit are more objective and appropriate measures.
- Justification of RHNA appeals. This bill requires a locality, if it disagrees with its RHNA allocation, to submit a request for a revision that includes a statement as to why the proposed allocation is not appropriate and why a revision is necessary to further the statutory objectives.
- Banning RHNA swaps. This bill deletes the authority of two local governments to agree to an alternative distribution of appealed housing allocations between the affected local governments.
- HCD’s role. This bill removes the existing law requirement for COGs to consult with HCD when preparing their RHNA plans, and instead requires COGs to consult with HCD when developing the methodology to be used in the allocation. It also requires HCD to determine, within 60 days, whether the methodology furthers the statutory objectives. The author states that requiring COGs to work with HCD in developing the methodology is intended to ensure against HCD finding issues at the end of the process.
- Local control. This bill includes a number of provisions intended to help preserve a measure of local control. For example, this bill provides that if HCD finds that a COG’s methodology does not further the statutory objectives, the COG may keep the methodology without revisions if it makes written findings justifying its decision. It also allows COGs to apply additional factors unrelated to the statutory objectives if it deems them necessary for health and safety reasons. Additionally, this bill allows a COG to reject an appeal by a locality or to adjust the allocation of one or more localities that are not the subject of an appeal.
- SB 828. Earlier this year, the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee heard SB 828 (Wiener), another RHNA reform bill. At that time the two bills had significant overlaps, but all major conflicts between the two bills have been removed through subsequent amendments.
Related/Prior Legislation
SB 828 (Wiener, 2018) makes a number of changes to the RHNA process. This bill is on the Assembly Floor.
AB 686 (Santiago, 2018) requires a public agency to administer its programs and activities relating to housing and community development in a manner to affirmatively further fair housing. The bill is on the Senate Floor.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: Fiscal Com.: Local:
According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:
- HCD estimates first year implementation costs of up to $463,000, which includes one-time database improvements of $50,000, and ongoing costs of up to $383,000 for 2 PY of permanent staff to manage workload associated with increased participation in the development and adoption of RHNA methodologies and the appeals of RHNA allocations. (General Fund)
- Unknown, potentially significant local costs for additional workload imposed on COGs related to the development of RHNA allocation methodologies and adopting allocation plans, as specified. Any new costs imposed on COGs or their constituent local governments are not state-reimbursable because local agencies have the authority to charge and adjust planning and permitting fees as necessary to cover administrative costs related to planning mandates.
California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation (co-source)
Western Center on Law and Poverty (co-source)
Bay Area Council
California Bicycle Coalition
California Housing Consortium
California Housing Partnership Corporation
City of Santa Monica
City of West Hollywood
Disability Rights California
Housing California
Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California
OPPOSITION: (Verified 8/16/18)
Association of Bay Area Governments
Sacramento Area Council of Governments
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The sponsors state that this bill will provide for a more data-driven distribution of the housing need, ensure greater transparency in the distribution process, and provide additional oversight to ensure that every local government in the state is planning for enough housing at all income levels.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: Opponents state that this bill weakens COGs and makes it more difficult for COGs to craft a regional housing plan that enjoys broad support and that RHNA decisions should be made at the local level, not mandated in statute.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 48-27, 5/31/18
AYES: Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Berman, Bloom, Bonta, Burke, Caballero, Calderon, Carrillo, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Daly, Eggman, Frazier, Friedman, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gloria, Gonzalez Fletcher, Gray, Grayson, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Kamlager-Dove, Levine, Limón, Low, McCarty, Medina, Mullin, Nazarian, Quirk, Reyes, Rodriguez, Rubio, Salas, Santiago, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Weber, Wood, Rendon
NOES: Acosta, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Brough, Cervantes, Chávez, Chen, Choi, Cunningham, Dahle, Flora, Fong, Gallagher, Harper, Kiley, Lackey, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, Melendez, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Patterson, Steinorth, Voepel, Waldron
NO VOTE RECORDED: Cooper, Muratsuchi, Quirk-Silva
8/18/18 13:35:17
**** END ****
SENATE COMMITTEE ON
Senator Anthony Portantino, Chair
2017 - 2018 Regular Session
AB 1771 (Bloom) - Planning and zoning: regional housing needs assessment
Version: | Policy Vote: |
Urgency: | Mandate: |
Hearing Date: | Consultant: |
This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.
Bill Summary:
AB 1771 would revise the process and requirements for developing the methodology for a regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) and adopting an allocation plan. Among other things, this bill would:
- Require the RHNA allocation methodology and plan to “further” specified objectives, rather than “be consistent with” those objectives. The bill also revises and expands the list of objectives.
- Require councils of government (COGs) to consult with the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in the development of the proposed methodology for distributing the existing and proposed housing needs.
- Revise and expand the list of factors that COGs must include in the development of the RHNA methodology.
- Require HCD to determine whether or not a proposed allocation methodology furthers, and does not undermine, the specified objectives.
- Revise the process for a local government to appeal to the COG for changes to RHNA shares before adoption of the final allocation plan, and authorize HCD to appeal for changes.
Fiscal Impact:
- HCD estimates first year implementation costs of up to $463,000, which includes one-time database improvements of $50,000, and ongoing costs of up to $383,000 for 2 PY of permanent staff to manage workload associated with increased participation in the development and adoption of RHNA methodologies and the appeals of RHNA allocations. (General Fund)
- Unknown, potentially significant local costs for additional workload imposed on COGs related to the development of RHNA allocation methodologies and adopting allocation plans, as specified. Any new costs imposed on COGs or their constituent local governments are not state-reimbursable because local agencies have the authority to charge and adjust planning and permitting fees as necessary to cover administrative costs related to planning mandates. (see staff comments)
Background:
Existing law requires cities and counties to prepare a general plan comprised of seven mandatory elements, including a housing element that identifies existing and projected housing needs. The housing element must include an inventory of adequate sites zoned for housing at all income levels and to accommodate a jurisdiction’s share of the RHNA that is sufficient to account for population growth and to overcome existing housing deficiencies over the planning period. The RHNA process is composed of three main stages: (1) development of regional housing need estimates by HCD and the Department of Finance; (2) allocation of housing among jurisdictions within each region by COGs (or HCD in an area not within a COG); and (3) incorporation of RHNA allocations into city and county housing elements.
Existing law requires the RHNA allocation plan adopted by COGs to be consistent with all of the following objectives:
- Increasing the housing supply and mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in each region’s jurisdictions in an equitable manner.
- Promoting infill development and socioeconomic equity, the protection of environmental and agricultural resources, and the encouragement of efficient development patterns.
- Promoting an improved intraregional relationship between jobs and housing.
- Allocating a lower proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately high share of households in that category compared to the countywide distribution of households in that category.
Existing law requires each COG to develop a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities and counties within the region. To the extent data from local governments or other sources are available, the COG’s allocation methodology must consider each jurisdiction’s existing and projected jobs/housing relationship and specified opportunities and constraints to development of additional housing. After considering input from each constituent jurisdiction and public comments on the proposed methodology, and making any appropriate revisions, the COG must adopt the final RHNA methodology and provide notice to each jurisdiction and HCD. Following the adoption of a final methodology, the COG distributes a draft allocation plan to each city affected city and county. Existing law prescribes a public process for local governments to request revisions to their RHNA shares, and specifies the requirements for COGs to make final determinations regarding the allocation plan. Once the final plan that fully allocates the regional share of statewide housing need is adopted in a public hearing, the COG must submit the plan to HCD for a determination of consistency with the region’s existing and projected housing need.
Proposed Law:
AB 1771 would revise the process and requirements for developing the RHNA allocation methodology and adopting an allocation plan. Among other things, this bill would:
- Require the RHNA allocation methodology and plan to “further” specified objectives, rather than “be consistent with” those objectives. The bill also revises and expands the list of objectives, as follows:
- Specify that the objective promoting an improved regional jobs/housing balance include an improved balance between the number of low-wage jobs and housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction.
- Add an objective to increase access to areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents, as specified, avoiding displacement and affirmatively furthering fair housing.
- Add an objective to allocate a higher proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately low share of households in that category.
- Require COGs to consult with HCD in the development of the proposed methodology for distributing the existing and proposed housing needs.
- Require the proposed methodology to be published on a COG or delegate subregion website, and include an explanation of how it furthers the specified objectives.
- Revise and expand the list of factors that COGs must include in the development of the RHNA methodology, as follows:
- Require additional data on the number of low-wage jobs in each jurisdiction and the number of units affordable to workers at those wage levels, as well as how many jobs and housing units were added in the last planning period.
- Delete the requirement to include data on housing market demand and high-housing cost burdens.
- Add information on the percentage of existing households at each income level that are paying more than 30% and more than 50% of their income on rent.
- Authorize a COG to include additional factors pertaining to health and safety concerns, as long as the factors do not undermine the specified objectives.
- Require a COG to submit the draft methodology to HCD, and require HCD to determine whether or not a proposed allocation methodology furthers, and does not undermine, the specified objectives. If HCD finds that the methodology is not consistent with those objectives, the COG has the option of revising the methodology or adopting a final methodology without revisions that includes written findings as to why it believes the methodology is consistent with the objectives.
- Revise the process for a local government to appeal to the COG for changes to RHNA shares before adoption of the final allocation plan, and authorize HCD to appeal for changes, as specified. Any revisions must include a statement as to why the revision is necessary to further the specified objectives.
- Delete the authority for two or more local governments to agree to an alternate distribution of appealed housing allocations between affected entities.
Related Legislation:
SB 828 (Wiener), which is currently pending in the Assembly Appropriations Committee, would make a number of changes to the RHNA process and COG methodologies for making RHNA determinations.
AB 1397 (Low), Chap. 375/2017, revised city and county housing element requirements regarding the identification of an inventory of land suitable for residential development to ensure that specific sites have a realistic and demonstrated potential to support housing development, as specified.
SB 35 (Wiener), Chap. 366/2017, established a streamlined, ministerial review process for certain multifamily affordable housing projects that are proposed in local jurisdictions that have not met regional housing needs, as specified.
Staff Comments:
HCD estimates the need for two additional PY of staff (one HCD Representative II, and one Attorney III) for implementation and ongoing administrative costs related to increased participation in the development of RHNA allocation methodologies and in the appeals process, at a cost of just over $400,000 in the first year, and $383,000 ongoing. The department also notes that it would incur one-time costs of approximately $50,000 for database improvements. Staff notes that actual costs for new HCD staffing may be lower, depending on the classifications of staff that are approved through the annual budget process.
The bill’s mandated local costs would not be subject to state reimbursement because local agencies have the authority to charge and adjust planning and permitting fees as necessary to cover administrative costs. Existing law authorizes planning and zoning fees to “include the costs reasonably necessary to prepare and revise the plans and policies that a local agency is required to adopt before it can make any necessary findings and determinations.” Case law and previous decisions by the Commission on State Mandates support the position that local governments’ planning costs are not reimbursable when the state imposes new planning mandates.
Recommended Amendments:
The bill should be amended to address chaptering conflicts with SB 828 (Wiener), as both bills amend Government Code Sections 65584 and 65584.04.
-- END --
SENATE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING
Senator Jim Beall, Chair
2017 - 2018 Regular
Bill No: AB 1771 Hearing Date: 6/26/2018
Author: | Bloom | ||
Version: | 6/20/2018 Amended | ||
Urgency: | No | Fiscal: | Yes |
Consultant: | Erin Riches | ||
SUBJECT: Planning and zoning: regional housing needs assessment
DIGEST: This bill makes changes to the regional housing needs assessment (RHNA) plan objectives, methodology, and distribution process.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- Requires each of California’s 18 metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) and 26 regional transportation planning agencies to prepare a long-range regional transportation plan (RTP). The RTP identifies the region’s vision and goals and how they will be implemented, as well as supporting the state’s goals for transportation, environmental quality, economic growth, and social equity. An RTP must be adopted every four years (every five years in air quality attainment areas).
- Requires, pursuant to SB 375 (Steinberg, Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008), each MPO to prepare a sustainable communities strategy (SCS) as part of its RTP. The SCS demonstrates how the region will meet its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction targets through land use, housing, and transportation strategies. The state Air Resources Board must review the adopted SCS to confirm that it will indeed meet the regional GHG targets.
- Requires every city and county to prepare and adopt a general plan, including a housing element, to guide the future growth of a community. The housing element must identify and analyze existing and projected housing needs, identify adequate sites with appropriate zoning to meet the housing needs of all income segments of the community, and ensure that regulatory systems provide opportunities for, and do not unduly constrain, housing development.
- Requires local governments located within the territory of an MPO to revise their housing elements every eight years, following the adoption of every other RTP. Local governments in rural non-MPO regions must revise their housing elements every five years.
- Requires each community’s fair share of housing to be determined through the regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) process, which is composed of three main stages:
- The Department of Finance and the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) develop regional housing needs estimates;
- Councils of government (COGs) allocate housing within each region based on these estimates (where a COG does not exist, HCD makes the determinations); and
- Cities and counties incorporate their allocations into their housing elements.
- Requires COGs to provide specified data assumptions to HCD from each COG’s projections.
- Requires the housing element to contain an assessment of housing needs and an inventory of resources and constraints relevant to meeting those needs.
- Requires a locality’s inventory of land suitable for residential development to be used to identify sites that can be developed for housing within the planning period and that are sufficient to provide for the locality’s share of the regional housing need for all income levels. Requires the inventory to provide certain information on each site, such as the general plan designation and zoning of each site and available infrastructure.
- Requires the inventory of land to specify the additional development potential for each non-vacant site within the planning period and an explanation of the methodology used to determine the development potential.
- Requires, where the inventory of sites does not identify adequate sites to accommodate the need for groups of all household income levels, rezoning of those sites to be completed in a specified time period. Requires this rezoning to accommodate 100% of the need for housing for very low and low-income households for which site capacity has not been identified in the inventory of sites on sites that shall be zoned to permit rental multifamily residential housing by right during the planning period.
- Prohibits a local jurisdiction from reducing or permitting the reduction of the residential density, or from allowing development at a lower residential density for any parcel, unless the jurisdiction makes specified written findings.
This bill:
- Removes the existing law requirement for COGs to seek the advice of HCD when preparing their RHNA allocation plans and instead requires COGs to consult with HCD when developing the methodology for the RHNA allocation.
- Revises the statutory objectives for the RHNA allocation plan as follows:
- Adds, to the existing objective requiring promotion of an improved intraregional jobs-housing relationship, provisions requiring inclusion of an improved balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction.
- Adds, to the existing objective requiring allocation of a lower proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately high share of households in that income category, provisions requiring an allocation of a higher proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately low share of households in that income category.
- Adds a new objective to increase access to areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents, avoiding displacement and affirmatively furthering fair housing. Defines these as areas that provide pathways to better lives, including through health, education, and employment.
- Adds to the information that must be distributed publicly, a requirement to explain how the methodology furthers the statutory objectives. Requires the information to be published on the COG’s website.
- Adds the following data requirements to the COG methodology:
- Requires the methodology to further the statutory objectives, rather than be consistent with them.
- Adds, to the list of factors used to develop the methodology, a requirement to include data on the number of low-wage jobs within the jurisdiction, how many housing units within the jurisdiction are affordable to workers at those wage levels, and how many jobs were added at what wage levels compared to how many housing units were added and at what income levels, in the last planning period.
- Revises one of the factors used to develop the methodology to require the percentage of existing households at each income level that are paying more than 30% and more than 50% of their income in rent.
- Adds a new factor, the rate of overcrowding.
- Requires the COG to specify which of the objectives each additional factor is necessary to further, should any other factors be adopted by the COG. The COG may only adopt additional factors if they do not undermine the objectives and the COG makes a finding that the factor is necessary to address specific health and safety concerns.
- Requires the COG to post its explanation of how each of the factors was incorporated into the methodology, and how the methodology furthers the statutory objectives, on its website.
- Requires the COG, after the public comment period on the proposed allocation methodology, and after making any revisions as a result of public comments and consultation with HCD, to post the draft allocation methodology on its website and submit it to HCD. HCD must determine within 60 days whether the methodology furthers, and does not undermine, the statutory objectives.
- Requires the COG, if HCD determines that the methodology is not consistent with the statutory objectives, to take one of the following actions:
- Revise the methodology pursuant HCD’s findings and adopt a final RHNA methodology.
- Adopt a final RHNA methodology without revisions and include within its resolution of adoption written findings as to why it believes the methodology is consistent with the statutory objectives despite HCD’s findings.
- Requires the COG to provide notice of the adoption of the final methodology to HCD and the jurisdictions within the region, and to post notice on its website.
- Allows a local government, within 45 days of the draft RHNA allocation being distributed, to appeal to the COG for a revision of the proposed RHNA allocation. The appeal must include a statement as to why the revision is necessary to further the statutory objectives. The appeal must be limited to:
- Failure to consider the survey information submitted by local governments in the region to inform the methodology.
- Significant and unforeseen changes in circumstances that occurred in the local jurisdiction or jurisdictions that merits a revision of the information submitted by local governments to inform the RHNA.
- Failure to determine the share of RHNA pursuant to the methodology defined in state law and in a manner that furthers and does not undermine the statutory objectives.
- Requires a COG to notify all other local governments in the region, as well as HCD, of all appeals, and to make all materials related to the appeals available on a public website. Provides that local governments and HCD have 45 days to comment on one or more appeals. If no appeals are filed, the draft allocation shall be deemed final.
- Requires the COG to conduct one public hearing to consider all appeals no later than 30 days after the close of the comment period after providing local governments in the region at least 21 days’ notice.
- Requires the COG to specify how the appeal request does not further the objectives, should the COG indicate that the proposed revision is inconsistent with the RHNA. Specifies that the final action may require the COG, as applicable, to adjust the allocation of one or more (rather than just one) local governments that are not the subject of the appeal.
- Requires the COG, no later than 45 days after the hearing, to do both of the following:
- Make a final determination that either accepts, rejects, or modifies each appeal for a revised share of the RHNA that includes written findings as to how the determination is necessary to the further statutory objectives.
- Issue a final allocation plan.
- Deletes the authority of two local governments to agree to an alternative distribution of appealed housing allocations between the affected local governments.
COMMENTS
- Purpose. The author states that the RHNA process plays a critical role in setting the state for housing production. While the RHNA distribution is supposed to be data-driven, unfortunately it is all too often influenced heavily by regional politics, resulting in low allocations to wealthier and often job-rich jurisdictions that could accommodate far more housing, particularly multifamily housing. The state has a number of laws on the books designed to ensure that housing gets built, but these laws generally only protect projects proposed on sites zoned for housing. When a jurisdiction gets a low RHNA number and thus has to zone very little land for housing, it frustrates the application of these laws and effectively allows that jurisdiction to remain off limits to housing construction. When the RHNA process becomes mired in politics, it can reinforce patterns of exclusion rather than achieving the fair housing and equity goals that are the fundamental underpinning of the statute. The author states that this bill provides for a more equitable, data-driven distribution of the housing need within regions, ensures greater transparency in the distribution process, and provides additional oversight to ensure that the process furthers statutory objectives.
- Consequences of a non-compliant housing element. Until very recently, communities without an approved housing element have faced limited ramifications. Last year, however, the Legislature passed a comprehensive package of housing bills, which was signed into law by Governor Brown on September 29, 2017. This package included a number of bills aimed at strengthening housing element law. Specific efforts to increase compliance include:
- SB 35 (Wiener, Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017) requires cities and counties to streamline housing developments that include specified percentages of affordable housing, if the city or county has not met all of its RHNA requirements. This new requirement has added additional weight to the RNHA process because the trigger for whether or not a jurisdiction must streamline is based on whether or not they have met their RNHA numbers for above moderate income (120% of AMI or above) or lower income (80% of AMI or below). Most jurisdictions have not met their lower income RNHA, meaning they must streamline projects that set aside at least 50% of units for lower-income.
- SB 166 (Skinner, Chapter 367, Statutes of 2017) modified the No Net Loss Zoning Law to require local governments to maintain adequate housing sites at all times throughout the planning period for all levels of income. This is intended to help ensure that a locality continues to maintain a supply of available land to accommodate the remaining unmet housing need throughout the eight-year life of the housing element.
- AB 72 (Chiu, Chapter 370, Statutes of 2017) authorized HCD to find a locality’s housing element out of substantial compliance if it finds the locality has acted, or failed to act, in compliance with its housing element and HCD had previously found it in substantial compliance. AB 72 also authorizes HCD to refer violations of housing element law to the state Attorney General. The primary mechanism to enforce state housing law is through the judicial system. It takes a great deal of resources to pursue judicial remedies; moreover, developers are hesitant to antagonize localities where they intend to have future development. AB 72 instead places this judicial enforcement burden on the state.
- Identifying realistic housing sites. In addition to the above cited measures, AB 1397 (Low, Chapter 375, Statutes of 2017) aimed to strengthen housing element law by restricting the types of sites that a local government may identify as suitable for residential development. AB 1397 addressed concerns that the law permitted local governments to designate very small sites that cannot realistically be developed for their intended use, or designate non-vacant sites with an ongoing commercial or residential use, even though the current use is expected to continue indefinitely. Under AB 1397, identified sites must have a sufficient available water, sewer, and dry utilities supply and must be available and accessible to support housing development or be included in an existing general plan program or other mandatory program or plan.
- Shining a light. The author states that this bill aims to address concerns that RHNA distributions are often influenced by regional politics rather than housing need. Some key provisions of this bill that aim to make the RHNA process more data-driven, transparent, and apolitical include:
- Furthering RHNA objectives. This bill requires the COG methodology to further the statutory RHNA objectives, rather than to just be consistent with them. It also requires COGs to publicly explain how each of the factors was incorporated into the methodology and how the methodology furthers the statutory objectives.
- Equity. This bill adds a new statutory objective to increase access to areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents, avoiding displacement and affirmatively furthering fair housing.
- Transparency. This bill requires COGs to post all RHNA information on a public website to help ensure it is available to all affected local governments and all interested stakeholders.
- Housing need, not housing market. This bill eliminates the existing law requirement to include the market demand for housing as a factor in developing the methodology. The sponsor states that factors such as housing need, housing burden, overcrowding, and jobs/housing fit are more objective and appropriate measures.
- Justification of RHNA appeals. This bill requires a locality, if it disagrees with its RHNA allocation, to submit a request for a revision that includes a statement as to why the proposed allocation is not appropriate and why a revision is necessary to further the statutory objectives.
- Banning RHNA swaps. This bill deletes the authority of two local governments to agree to an alternative distribution of appealed housing allocations between the affected local governments.
- HCD’s role. This bill removes the existing law requirements for COGs to consult with HCD when preparing their RHNA plans, and instead requires COGs to consult with HCD when developing the methodology to be used in the allocation. It also requires HCD to determine, within 60 days, whether the methodology furthers the statutory objectives. The author states that requiring COGs to work with HCD in developing the methodology is intended to ensure against HCD finding issues at the end of the process.
- Local control. This bill includes a number of provisions intended to help preserve a measure of local control. For example, this bill provides that if HCD finds that a COG’s methodology does not further the statutory objectives, the COG may keep the methodology without revisions if it makes written findings justifying its decision. It also allows COGs to apply additional factors unrelated to the statutory objectives if it deems them necessary for health and safety reasons. Additionally, this bill allows a COG to reject an appeal by a locality or to adjust the allocation of one or more localities that are not the subject of an appeal.
- SB 828. Earlier this year, this committee heard SB 828 (Wiener), another RHNA reform bill. The primary overlaps between this bill and SB 828 are in the provisions relating to the COG methodology. The committee recommends working out these differences before the bills reach the respective Floor of each house.
- Opposition concerns. The Association of Bay Area Governments states that this bill would weaken COGs and make it more difficult for COGs to craft a regional housing plan that enjoys broad support. The Sacramento Area Council of Governments states that RHNA decisions should be made at the local level, not mandated in statute. The City of Beverly Hills states that it is highly interested in collaborating with neighboring jurisdictions to construct affordable housing where it makes sense for both jurisdictions, but this bill would prevent Beverly Hills from receiving RHNA credit in such a situation.
Related Legislation:
SB 828 (Wiener, 2017) — makes a number of changes to the RHNA process. This bill passed out of the Assembly Housing Committee on June 20th and will be heard in the Assembly Local Government Committee on June 27th.
AB 686 (Santiago, 2017) — requires a public agency to administer its programs and activities relating to housing and community development in a manner to affirmatively further fair housing. This bill passed out of the Transportation and Housing Committee on an 11-1 vote on June 12th and is scheduled to be heard in the Judiciary Committee on June 26th.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: Fiscal Com.: Local:
POSITIONS: (Communicated to the committee before noon on Wednesday,
June 20, 2018.)
SUPPORT:
California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation (co-sponsor)
Western Center on Law and Poverty (co-sponsor)
Bay Area Council
California Bicycle Coalition
California Housing Consortium
California Housing Partnership Corporation
City of Santa Monica
City of West Hollywood
Disability Rights California
Housing California
Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California
OPPOSITION:
Association of Bay Area Governments
Sacramento Area Council of Governments
-- END --
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
ATR Bill Id:AB 1771
Author:(Bloom)
As Amended Ver:May 25, 2018
Majority vote
Committee | Votes | Ayes | Noes |
Housing | 6-1 | Chiu, Maienschein, Chau, Gloria, Limón, Wood | Choi |
Local Government | 6-2 | Aguiar-Curry, Bloom, Caballero, Cooley, Grayson, Mark Stone | Waldron, Lackey |
Appropriations | 12-4 | Gonzalez Fletcher, Bloom, Bonta, Calderon, Carrillo, Chau, Eggman, Friedman, Eduardo Garcia, Nazarian, Quirk, Reyes | Bigelow, Fong, Gallagher, Obernolte |
SUMMARY: Makes changes to the regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) plan objectives, methodology, distribution, and appeals process. Specifically, this bill:
- Revises provisions of law related to the RHNA plan and the objectives that must be met in that plan, as follows:
- Requires the RHNA plan to further the objectives, rather than to be consistent with the specified objectives;
- Adds, to the existing objective that requires promoting an improved intraregional relationship between jobs and housing, provisions that require inclusion of an improved balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction;
- Adds, to the existing objective that requires allocation of a lower proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately high share of households in that income category, provisions that require an allocation of a higher proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately low share of households in that income category, as specified;
- Adds an objective to increase access to areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents, avoiding displacement and affirmatively furthering fair housing; and,
- Defines "areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents" to mean areas that provide pathways to better lives, including through health, education, and employment.
- Revises provisions of RHNA law related to the proposed methodology that each Council of Governments or delegate subregion (COG) as applicable, must develop for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or subregion, as follows:
- Requires the methodology to further the objectives listed in RHNA law, rather than be consistent with the objectives;
- Adds, to the list of factors that are used to develop the methodology, specific to each member jurisdiction's existing and projected jobs and housing relationship, a requirement that this shall include data on the number of low-wage jobs within the jurisdiction and how many housing units within the jurisdiction are affordable to workers at those wage levels, as well as how many jobs were added and at what wage levels compared to how many housing units were added and at what income levels in the last planning period;
- Revises one of the factors used to develop the methodology to require the existing and projected demand for housing at each of the income levels, as specified, instead of the market demand for housing;
- Revises one of the factors used to develop the methodology to require the percentage
of existing households at each of the income levels listed that are paying more than 30% and more than 50% of their income in rate, instead of high cost housing burdens; - Adds a new factor in the development of the methodology that would require the rate
of overcrowding; and, - Requires the COG to specify which of the objectives that each additional factor is necessary to further, should any other factors be adopted by the COG.
- Requires the COG, after the public comment period on the proposed allocation methodology, to submit the draft allocation methodology to the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).
- Requires HCD to determine with 60 days if the methodology furthers and does not undermine stat objectives.
- Requires the COG to make any necessary changes and adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology and provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, and to HCD, following the receipt of HCD's determination.
- Provides that the requirement to allocate housing within the region consistent with the development pattern included in the sustainable communities strategy cannot be a basis for limiting development from all suitable housing sites and land suitable for urban development.
- Requires each COG and delegate subregion, as applicable, to distribute a draft allocation to each local government in the region or subregion, based on the methodology specified above.
- Allows a local government within a region or delegate region or HCD to appeal to the COG or the delegate subregion, as applicable, a revision of the share of the regional housing need allocated to one or more local government. Requires the request to include a statement as to how it furthers the objectives.
- Requires appeals to the COG of the proposed RNHA allocation to be limited to the following:
- Failure to consider the survey information submitted local governments in the region to inform the methodology;
- Significant and unforeseen changes in circumstances that occurred in the local jurisdiction or jurisdictions that merits a revisions of the information submitted by local governments to inform the RNHA; and
- Failure to determine the share of RNHA in accordance with the methodology defined in state law and in a manner that furthers and does not undermine the objectives of state law.
- Requires a COG to notify all other local governments in the region and HCD of all appeals and make all materials submitted in support of each appeal available on a publicly available Internet Web site.
- Allows local governments and HCD 45 days to comment on one or more appeals.
- Provides that if no appeals are received the draft allocation shall be considered final.
- Requires the COG to conduct one public hearing to consider all appeals no later than 30 days after the close of the comment period after providing local governments in the region at least 21 days notice.
- Requires the COG to specify how the request does not further the objectives, should the COG indicate that the proposed revision is inconsistent with the regional housing need.
- Specifies that the final action may require the COG, as applicable, to adjust the allocation of one or more local governments that are not the subject of an appeal.
- Provides that no later than 45 days after the public hearing the COG shall do both of the following:
- Make a final determination that either accepts, rejects, or modifies each appeal for a revised share of the RNHA that includes written findings as to how the determination is necessary to further the objectives of state law; and
- Issue a final allocation plan.
- Deletes the authority of two local governments to agree to an alternative distribution of appealed housing allocations between the affected local governments.
- States that nothing in the bill is intended to be read to change jurisdictions' obligations, discretion, or flexibility under existing law related to the preparation and adoption of a housing element. And no jurisdiction is compelled to take any one particular action that is not already required by law or prohibit a jurisdiction from taking any one particular action that is already prohibited by law in implementing a housing element.
- States that no reimbursement is required because a local agency has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by the bill's provisions.
- Defines "areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents" to mean areas that provide pathways to better lives, including through health, education, and employment.
FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, unknown state mandated costs to COGs. The state does not need to reimburse these costs because locals have the authority to levy fees to cover them.
COMMENTS:
Background: Housing element law requires local governments to adequately plan to meet their existing and projected housing needs including their share of the regional housing need. The housing element update process addresses the statewide concern of providing "decent housing and a suitable living environment for every California family," in part by facilitating increases in housing supply to accommodate the needs of the state's population and its growth. The law recognizes the most critical decisions regarding housing development occur at the local level within the context of the general plan. In order for the private sector to adequately address housing needs and demand, local governments must regularly update their general plans, zoning, and development standards to provide opportunities for, and not unduly constrain, housing development for all income groups.
Regional housing needs assessment (RHNA) for each city and county constitute a fundamental basis for housing element updates. The state projects new RHNA numbers every eight years, or in some rural areas every five years. RHNA for each city and county is a projection of additional housing units needed to accommodate existing households and projected household growth of all income levels by the end of the housing element planning period.
RHNAs establish minimum housing development capacity that cities and counties are to make available via their land use powers to accommodate growth within a planning period. RHNAs are assigned by four income categories as guideposts for each community to develop a mix of housing types for all economic segments of the population. The process is also known as "fair share" planning, as shares of the regional housing need are determined for constituent cities and counties of the affected region of the housing element update cycle. Regions are represented by COGs or counties, which are charged with preparing RHNA plans.
In consultation with each COG, HCD determines the housing needs for each region using a demographic method based on Department of Financing (DOF) population projections. While HCD forwards projections for the region, the distribution of the need within the region to individual cities and counties is subject to determination by the COG. Two years prior to a housing element revision, the COG develops a methodology for distributing the RNHA to jurisdictions within the region. The methodology must consider certain factors spelled out in statute. Local jurisdictions provide data to the COG that is used in the methodology to determine the distribution of housing need within the region. COGs allocate the RHNA to their city and county members in a draft allocation plan and each city and county has an opportunity to request revision of their needs allocation by the COG. The COG may revise the initial allocations, subject to maintaining the total regional need.
The methodology is required to consider the existing and projected jobs housing relationship; the opportunities and constraints to building housing in a jurisdiction; a comparison between household growth and regional transportation plans; market demand for housing; agreements to direct growth to unincorporated areas; the loss of assisted housing units due to expiring covenants or contracts; the housing needs of farmworkers; and housing generated by universities. In addition, the COG can consider any other factors it chooses.
The RNHA process has been criticized as being a political rather than a data driven process. COGs distribute the allocation by both the supporting data but also in some cases based on which jurisdictions are willing accept housing units. A component of the methodology used to determine the allocation of RNHA is a jurisdiction's willingness to accept a higher share of the proposed share of the RNHA. The Haas Institute at UC Berkeley published a study, "Unfair Share" Racial Disparities and Regional Housing Needs Allocation in the Bay Area," which found a relationship between the number of units allocated, adjusted for population size, and the racial composition of the city. Local governments with higher percentages of white residents were more likely to have received lower allocations of moderate and lower income housing.
SB 35 (Wiener), Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017, required that cities and counties streamline housing developments that include either 10% of units at or below 80% of Area Median Income (AMI) or 50% units at or below 80% of AMI. This new requirement has added additional weight to the RNHA process because the trigger for whether or not a jurisdiction must streamline is based on whether or not they have met their RNHA numbers for above moderate income (120% of AMI or above) or lower income (80% of AMI or below). Most jurisdictions have not met their lower income RNHA and are subject to streamlining if the developer meets the requirements of the bill, including that 50% of the units are restricted to lower income households.
Additional objectives: The regional housing needs plan is required to be consistent with several objectives including that each jurisdiction takes a share of the housing need for all income levels or their "fair share;" that the distribution promotes infill development and social equity; the promotion of an interregional relationship between jobs and housing; and where a jurisdiction has a high percentage of existing housing in an income level allocating a smaller amount in that income category. This bill would add additional objectives to the list including, increasing access to high opportunity for lower-income residents, avoiding displacement and affirmatively furthering fair housing.
In 2017, the Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) and HCD convened a group of independent organizations and research centers with the purpose of establishing a state fair housing taskforce. The first task for the task force was to assist TCAC and HCD in creating evidence-based approaches to increase access to opportunity for families with children living in housing subsidized by the Low-Income Housing Tax credit (LIHTC) program. TCAC and HCD asked the taskforce to create a statewide opportunity mapping tool that could be adopted to accompany the regulations to incentive development of large-family, new construction of developments with 9% LIHTC in neighborhoods whose characteristics have been shown by research to support childhood development and economic mobility for low-income families. The intent is to use this new mapping tool to direct and inform state policies to increase access for low-income families to high-resource neighborhoods.
Analysis Prepared by: Lisa Engel / H. & C.D. / (916) 319-2085 FN: 0003439
Date of Hearing: May 9, 2018
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 1771
Author:(Bloom) – As Amended Ver:April 17, 2018
Policy Committee: | Housing and Community Development | Vote: | 6 - 1 |
Local Government | 6 - 2 | ||
|
|
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY:
This bill makes changes to the regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) plan objectives, methodology, distribution, and appeals process. Specifically, this bill:
- Revises and adds certain objectives to the list of statutory objectives already contained in RHNA law.
- Adds additional data points to the distribution methodology and restricts council of governments’ (COGs) ability to use other factors beyond those listed in statute.
- Requires the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to determine whether a COG’s distribution methodology is consistent with the law, and requires HCD, rather than the COG, to hear appeals if a COG denies an initial challenge to one or more jurisdictions’ allocations.
- Allows specified housing organizations to challenge the RHNA share. Under current law only the affected city or county can appeal.
FISCAL EFFECT:
- Ongoing costs the HCD of approximately $740,000 (GF) annually for four additional positions to review the COGs RHNA methodology and provide the appeals process required in the bill.
- Unknown state mandated costs to COGs. The state does not need to reimburse these costs because locals have the authority to levy fees to cover them.
COMMENTS:
- Purpose. According to the author:
Our accomplishments from last year (including AB 1397, SB 35, and several other bills in the Housing Package) mean very little if the RHNA allocations are not equitable and data-driven. Fair and Accurate RHNA allocations that ensure every local government is playing a part in addressing the housing crisis is the main goal with AB 1771.
- Background. The RHNA for each city and county is a projection of additional housing units needed to accommodate existing households and projected household growth of all income levels by the end of the housing element planning period. The state projects new RHNA numbers every eight years, or in some rural areas every five years.
RHNAs establish minimum housing development capacity that cities and counties must make available via their land use powers to accommodate growth within a planning period. RHNAs are assigned by four income categories as guideposts for each community to develop a mix of housing types for all economic segments of the population. The process is also known as "fair share" planning, as shares of the regional housing need are determined for constituent cities and counties of the affected region. Regions are represented by COGs or counties, which are charged with preparing RHNA plans.
The RNHA process has been criticized as being a political process rather than a data-driven process. COGs distribute the allocation by both the supporting data and, in some cases, based on which jurisdictions are willing to accept housing units. A component of the methodology used to determine the allocation of RNHA is a jurisdiction's willingness to accept a higher share of the proposed share of the RNHA. The Haas Institute at UC Berkeley published a study, "Unfair Share: Racial Disparities and Regional Housing Needs Allocation in the Bay Area," which found a relationship between the number of units allocated, adjusted for population size, and the racial composition of the city. Local governments with higher percentages of white residents were more likely to have received lower allocations of moderate- and lower-income housing.
- Arguments in Support. Supporters argue that this bill will provide for a more equitable, data-driven distribution of the housing need within regions, ensure greater transparency in the distribution process, and provide additional oversight to ensure that the process furthers statutory objectives.
- Arguments in Opposition. Opposition argues that there is a need for all types of housing projects across the state in order to keep pace with the demand, and that by favoring the production of below-market-rate housing, this proposal would ultimately result in fewer houses being built overall.
Analysis Prepared by: Jennifer Swenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081
Date of Hearing: April 25, 2018
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Cecilia Aguiar-Curry, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 1771 (
Author:Bloom) – As Amended Ver:April 17, 2018
SUBJECT: Planning and zoning: regional housing needs assessment.
SUMMARY: Makes changes to the regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) plan objectives, methodology, distribution, and appeals process. Specifically, this bill:
- Revises provisions of law related to the RHNA plan and the objectives that must be met in that plan, as follows:
- Requires the RHNA plan to further the objectives, rather than to be consistent with the specified objectives;
- Adds, to the existing objective that requires promoting an improved intraregional relationship between jobs and housing, provisions that require inclusion of an improved balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction;
- Adds, to the existing objective that requires allocation of a lower proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately high share of households in that income category, provisions that require an allocation of a higher proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately low share of households in that income category, as specified;
- Adds an objective to increase access to areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents, avoiding displacement and affirmatively furthering fair housing; and,
- Defines “areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents” to mean areas that provide pathways to better lives, including through health, education, and employment.
- Revises provisions of RHNA law related to the proposed methodology that each Council of Governments (COG), or delegate subregion as applicable, must develop for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or subregion, as follows:
- Requires the methodology to further the objectives listed in RHNA law, rather than be consistent with the objectives;
- Adds, to the list of factors that are used to develop the methodology, specific to each member jurisdiction’s existing and projected jobs and housing relationship, a requirement that this shall include data on the number of low-wage jobs within the jurisdiction and how many housing units within the jurisdiction are affordable to workers at those wage levels, as well as how many jobs were added and at what wage levels compared to how many housing units were added and at what income levels in the last planning period;
- Revises one of the factors used to develop the methodology to require the existing and projected demand for housing at each of the income levels, as specified, instead of the market demand for housing;
- Revises one of the factors used to develop the methodology to require the percentage
of existing households at each of the income levels listed that are paying more than 30% and more than 50% of their income in rate, instead of high cost housing burdens; - Adds a new factor in the development of the methodology that would require the rate
of overcrowding; and, - Requires the COG to specify which of the objectives that each additional factor is necessary to further, should any other factors be adopted by the COG.
- Requires the COG, after the public comment period on the proposed allocation methodology, to submit the draft allocation methodology to the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).
- Requires HCD, within 60 days, to determine whether or not the methodology furthers, and does not undermine, the objectives.
- Requires the COG or delegate subregion to make any necessary changes and adopt a final regional, or subregional, housing need allocation methodology and provide notice of the adoption of the methodology to the jurisdictions within the region, and to HCD, following the receipt of HCD’s determination.
- Provides that the requirement to allocate housing within the region consistent with the development pattern included in the sustainable communities strategy cannot be a basis for limiting development from all suitable housing sites and land suitable for urban development.
- Requires each COG and delegate subregion, as applicable, to distribute a draft allocation to each local government in the region or subregion, based on the methodology specified above.
- Allows a housing organization, as defined, to request from the COG or the delegate subregion, as applicable, a revision of the share of the regional housing need allocated to one or more local government. Provides that these requests shall be in accordance with the objectives and factors specified above. Requires the request to include a statement as to how it furthers, and does not undermine the objectives.
- Requires the COG or delegate subregion to specify how the request does not further the objectives, should the COG or subregion indicate that the proposed revision is inconsistent with the regional housing need.
- Adds housing organizations to the provisions of laws that allow a local government to appeal the draft allocation to HCD, and revises criteria for the appeal.
- Requires HCD to conduct public hearings on the appeal, instead of the COG or delegate subregion, as applicable. Requires the local government or housing organization to be notified within 10 days of a public hearing on the appeal.
- Requires HCD to consider all comments, recommendations and available data, submitted
by the appellant. - Requires HCD’s final action on an appeal to include written findings, supported by a preponderance of the evidence on the record.
- Specifies that the final action may require the COG or subregion, as applicable, to adjust the allocation of one or more local governments that are not the subject of an appeal.
- Requires the COG or subregion, to issue a proposed final allocation that takes into account HCD’s actions on all appeals, as specified.
- Requires the final allocation plan adopted by the COG or subregion to take into account HCD’s actions on all appeals, as specified.
- Defines “housing organization” to mean a nonprofit organization whose primary mission includes providing or advocating for increased access to housing for low-income households.
- States that no reimbursement is required because a local agency has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by the bill’s provisions.
EXISTING LAW:
- Requires HCD, in consultation with each COG, to determine each region's existing and projected housing need at least two years prior to a scheduled housing element revision.
- Requires a COG, or for cities or counties without a COG, HCD to adopt a final regional housing needs plan that allocates a share of the regional housing need to each city or county at least one year prior to a scheduled housing element revision.
- Requires the regional housing needs assessment plan to be consistent with all of the following objectives:
- Increasing the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner that results in each jurisdiction receiving an allocation of units for low- and very low-income households;
- Promoting infill development and socioeconomic equity, the protection of environmental and agricultural resources, and encouraging efficient development patterns;
- Promoting an improved intraregional relationship between jobs and housing; and,
- Allocating a lower proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a high share of households in the income category as compared to the county wide distribution of households in that category for the most recent U.S. census.
- Requires each COG to develop a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities and counties within the region, two years prior to the scheduled housing element revision.
- Requires, to the extent that data is available, the COG to include the following factors in developing the methodology that allocates the regional housing needs assessment:
- Each member jurisdiction's existing and projected jobs housing relationship;
- Opportunities and constraints to developing additional housing in each jurisdiction including the following:
- Lack of capacity for sewer or water due to federal or state laws, regulations, or regulatory actions or decisions made by a sewer or water service provider other than the jurisdiction that preclude the jurisdiction from providing necessary infrastructure for additional development during the planning period;
- The availability of land suitable for urban development or for conversion to residential use, the availability of underutilized land, and opportunities for infill development increased residential densities, including the potential for increased residential development under alternative zoning ordinances and land use restrictions;
- Lands preserved or protected from urban development under existing federal or state programs;
- County policies to preserve prime agricultural land;
- Distribution of household growth assumed for purposes of a comparable period of regional transportation plans and opportunities to maximize the use of public transportation and the existing transportation infrastructure;
- Market demand for housing;
- Agreements between a county and cities to direct growth toward incorporated areas of the county;
- Loss of low income units in assisted housing developments as a result of mortgage prepayment, expiration of subsidy contracts, and the termination of use restrictions;
- The housing needs of farmworkers;
- The housing needs of universities; and,
- Any other factor adopted by the COG.
- Requires each COG to survey each member jurisdiction and request the information necessary to allow for the development of the methodology described in 5) above, six months prior to developing the methodology.
- Requires public participation and access in drafting the methodology, and in the process
of drafting and adopting the allocation of the regional housing need, including at least one public hearing to receive oral and written comments. - Requires each COG to explain in writing how each of the factors required to be incorporated in the methodology are incorporated and how they further the objectives required to be included in the regional housing needs plan.
- Requires each COG, in addition to the factors listed in 5), to identity any existing local, regional or state incentives, such as priority for funding to those local governments willing to accept a higher share of housing than proposed in the draft allocation plan.
- Requires a COG to adopt a final housing needs allocation methodology after the public comment period and make any revisions as a result of the public comments received.
FISCAL EFFECT: This bill is keyed fiscal and contains a state-mandated local program.
COMMENTS:
- Bill Summary. This bill makes a number of changes to the regional housing needs plan objectives, methodology, distribution, and appeals process. The bill revises and adds certain objectives to the list of statutory objectives already contained in RHNA law, adds additional data points to the distribution methodology, and restricts a COG’s ability to use other factors beyond those listed in statute. The bill also inserts HCD into the RHNA process in several ways: a) the bill requires HCD to determine whether a COG’s distribution methodology is consistent with the law; and, b) the bill requires HCD, rather than the COG, to hear appeals
if a COG denies an initial challenge to one or more jurisdictions’ allocations. Additionally, the bill allows specified housing organizations to challenge the RHNA share, when under current law only the affected city or county can appeal.
This bill is co-sponsored by the California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation and the Western Center on Law and Poverty.
- Author’s Statement. According to the author, “Our accomplishments from last year (including AB 1397, of which I was a joint author, SB 35, and several other bills in the Housing Package) mean very little if the RHNA allocations are not equitable and date-driven. Fair and Accurate RHNA allocations that ensure every local government is playing a part in addressing the housing crisis is the main goal with AB 1771.
“The existing process too often ignores that data and allows local governments to push back to what they are comfortable with rather [than] what they could actually accommodate with changes in zoning. In an effort to add an independent voice, the bill adds HCD to the process. This allows them to determine whether the distribution methodology is consistent with the law before the numbers are even run so that the COG can make any needed.
“The existing process provides a loophole that can allow politics to override process by including language that allows for a COG to add “any other factors” to their distribution methodology. This bill narrows that definition so that any other factors a COG uses to determine how to distribute the RHNA that are not explicitly spelled out in statute are consistent with the goals of the statute.
“This bill allows organizations to challenge RHNA numbers as well as surrounding jurisdictions. Existing RHNA allocations can only be challenged by the jurisdiction assigned the RHNA number. It’s important to remember that RHNA is a floor not a ceiling. RHNA is a planning tool that is critical to setting the stage for housing production. If the process is flawed, then we don’t get housing in the places where it is needed and some cities do not have to contribute to addressing regional housing needs. When job-rich jurisdictions don’t have to plan for housing, it frustrates our ability to meet our climate goals.”
- Background. Housing element law requires local governments to adequately plan to meet their existing and projected housing needs, including their share of the regional housing need. The housing element update process addresses the statewide concern of providing "decent housing and a suitable living environment for every California family," in part by facilitating increases in housing supply to accommodate the needs of the state's population and its growth. The law recognizes the most critical decisions regarding housing development occur at the local level within the context of the general plan. In order for the private sector to adequately address housing needs and demand, local governments must regularly update their general plans, zoning, and development standards to provide opportunities for, and not unduly constrain, housing development for all income groups.
RHNA for each city and county constitutes a fundamental basis for housing element updates. The state projects new RHNA numbers every eight years, or in some rural areas every five years. RHNA for each city and county is a projection of additional housing units needed to accommodate existing households and projected household growth of all income levels by the end of the housing element planning period.
RHNAs establish minimum housing development capacity that cities and counties are to make available via their land use powers to accommodate growth within a planning period. RHNAs are assigned by four income categories as guideposts for each community to develop a mix of housing types for all economic segments of the population. The process is also known as "fair share" planning, as shares of the regional housing need are determined for constituent cities and counties of the affected region of the housing element update cycle. Regions are represented by COGs or counties, which are charged with preparing RHNA plans.
In consultation with each COG, HCD determines the housing needs for each region using a demographic method based on Department of Finance (DOF) population projections. While HCD forwards projections for the region, the distribution of the need within the region to individual cities and counties is subject to determination by the COG. Two years prior to a housing element revision, the COG develops a methodology for distributing the RNHA to jurisdictions within the region. The methodology must consider certain factors spelled out in statute. Local jurisdictions provide data to the COG that is used in the methodology to determine the distribution of housing need within the region. COGs allocate the RHNA to their city and county members in a draft allocation plan and each city and county has an opportunity to request revision of their needs allocation by the COG. The COG may revise the initial allocations, subject to maintaining the total regional need.
The methodology is required to consider the existing and projected jobs housing relationship; the opportunities and constraints to building housing in a jurisdiction; a comparison between household growth and regional transportation plans; market demand for housing; agreements to direct growth to unincorporated areas; the loss of assisted housing units due to expiring covenants or contracts; the housing needs of farmworkers; and housing generated by universities. In addition, the COG can consider any other factors it chooses.
The RNHA process has been criticized as being a political rather than a data driven process. COGs distribute the allocation by both the supporting data but also in some cases based on which jurisdictions are willing to accept housing units. A component of the methodology used to determine the allocation of RNHA is a jurisdiction's willingness to accept a higher share of the proposed share of the RNHA. The Haas Institute at UC Berkeley published a study, "Unfair Share" Racial Disparities and Regional Housing Needs Allocation in the Bay Area," which found a relationship between the number of units allocated, adjusted for population size, and the racial composition of the city. Local governments with higher percentages of white residents were more likely to have received lower allocations of moderate- and lower-income housing.
- Policy Considerations. The Committee may wish to consider the following:
- Timeframe Concerns and Appeals Process. This bill inserts new players into the RHNA appeals process, including HCD and any housing organization that meets the definition contained in the bill. According to the California Association of Councils of Governments (CALCOG), which has an “oppose unless amended” position, these new challenges from outside organizations may upset the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) timeline.
Currently, the only entity that can appeal is the city or county that is given the RHNA allocation. The Committee may wish to consider whether it is appropriate to allow housing organizations to also appeal, and if so, whether this change in policy should favor housing organizations solely, or whether there should be other entities or organizations that may also have grounds to appeal. For example, what about a neighboring city or county, or an engaged community group?
American Planning Association, California Chapter, echoes concerns about the addition of so many detailed components of review and additional data collection contained in the bill, and note that “the additional complexity would make meeting the required timeframe for RHNA even more difficult than it is now, with added process, HCD review and appeal, etc.”
- New Mandate on COGs. This bill could potentially require new duties of COGs in order to implement the bill’s provisions. CALCOG notes that in 1984, the Commission on State Mandates ruled that COGS are not eligible for reimbursement for the duties imposed by Government Code Section 65584.
- Arguments in Support. Supports argue that this bill will provide for a more equitable, data-driven distribution of the housing need within regions, ensure greater transparency in the distribution process, and provide additional oversight to ensure that the process furthers statutory objectives.
- Arguments in Opposition. Opponents argue that there is a need for all types of housing projects across the state in order to keep pace with the demand, and that by favoring the production of below market rate housing, this proposal would ultimately result in fewer houses being built overall.
- Double-referral. This bill was heard in the Housing and Community Development Committee on April 11, 2018, and passed on a 6-1 vote.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation [CO-SPONSOR]
Western Center on Law and Poverty [CO-SPONSOR]
California Bicycle Coalition
California Housing Consortium
Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California
American Planning Association (if amended)
Opposition
California Association of Councils of Governments (unless amended)
California Building Industry Association (unless amended)
Analysis Prepared by: Debbie Michel / L. GOV. / (916) 319-3958
Date of Hearing: April 11, 2018
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
David Chiu, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 1771 (
Author:Bloom) – As Amended Ver:March 19, 2018
SUBJECT: Planning and zoning: regional housing needs assessment
SUMMARY: Makes changes to the regional housing needs allocation plan objectives, methodology, and distribution process. Specifically, this bill:
- Changes the requirement that the regional housing needs allocation plan "be consistent" with specified objectives to the regional housing needs plan "shall further and not undermine the intent of" the specified objectives.
- Revises the objectives a regional housing needs allocation plan is required to further to include:
- Promote improved intraregional relationships between jobs including an improved balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction;
- Allocate a higher portion of housing needs to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately low share of households in that income category; and
- Increase access to areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents, avoiding displacement, and affirmatively furthering fair housing.
- Adds the following to the list of factors a local government shall include when developing the methodology for allocating regional housing needs:
- Data on the number of low-wage jobs within the jurisdiction and how many housing units within the jurisdiction are affordable to workers at those wage levels;
- Data on how many jobs were added and at what wage levels compared to how many housing units were added and at what income levels in the last planning period;
- The existing and projected demand for housing for very low-, lower, moderate, and above moderate- income households;
- The percentage of existing very low-, lower, moderate, and above-moderate income households that are paying more than 30% and more than 50% of their income in rent; and,
- The rate of overcrowding.
- Requires a council of governments (COG) to specify how any additional factors they adopt as part of the methodology further and do not undermine the objectives of the regional housing needs assessment.
- Increases the number of public hearings a COG is required to hold on the methodology for distributing reginal housing needs from one to two hearings.
- Deletes the requirement that COGs identify any existing local, regional, or state incentives such as a priority for funding or other incentives available to local governments willing to accept a higher share of the regional housing need.
- Provides that the requirement to allocate housing within the region consistent with the development pattern included in the sustainable community strategy, cannot be a basis for limiting development from all suitable housing sites and land suitable for urban development.
- Requires a COG to submit a draft regional housing needs allocation to Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) after receiving public comment and making revisions.
- Requires HCD to determine within 60 days whether or not the methodology furthers and does not undermine the objectives that are required to be included in the regional housing needs allocation plan.
- Requires a COG to make any necessary changes based on HCD's determination prior to adopting a final housing need allocation methodology.
- Allows a housing organization to request a COG revise the share of regional housing needs to one or more local governments in accordance with the objectives for allocating a regional housing needs allocation plan.
- Requires a housing organization or local government that requests revision in their share of regional housing need to include a statement as to how the revision does not undermine the intent of the objectives required for the regional housing need allocation plan.
- Allows a housing organization or local government to appeal a decision by the COG to reject a revision or modification of the regional housing needs plan, to HCD.
- Requires HCD, rather than the COG, to conduct a public hearing to hear all appeals within 60 days of the date established to file appeals.
- Requires the final action by HCD on an appeal to be in writing and include written findings supported by a preponderance of the evidence on the record as to how the action is consistent with the requirements of the regional housing need methodology and allocation requirements.
- Requires the COG to take HCD's action on all appeals into consideration in issuing a final regional housing needs allocation.
- Defines "housing organization" to mean a nonprofit organization whose mission includes providing or advocating for increased access to housing for low-income households.
EXISTING LAW:
- Requires HCD, in consultation with each COG, to determine each region's existing and projected housing need at least two years prior to a scheduled housing element revision.
- Requires a COG, or for cities or counties without a COG, HCD to adopt a final regional housing needs plan that allocates a share of the regional housing need to each city or county at least one year prior to a scheduled housing element revision.
- Requires the regional housing needs assessment plan to be consistent with all of the following objectives:
- Increasing the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner that results in each jurisdiction receiving an allocation of units for low- and very low-income households;
- Promoting infill development and socioeconomic equity, the protection of environmental and agricultural resources, and encouraging efficient development patterns;
- Promoting an improved intraregional relationship between jobs and housing; and
- Allocating a lower proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a high share of households in the income category as compared to the county wide distribution of households in that category for the most recent U.S. census.
- Requires each COG to develop a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities and counties within the region, two years prior to the scheduled housing element revision.
- Requires, to the extent that data is available, the COG to include the following factors in developing the methodology that allocates the regional housing needs assessment:
- Each member jurisdiction's existing and projected jobs housing relationship;
- Opportunities and constraints to developing additional housing in each jurisdiction including the following:
- Lack of capacity for sewer or water due to federal or state laws, regulations, or regulatory actions or decisions made by a sewer or water service provider other than the jurisdiction that preclude the jurisdiction from providing necessary infrastructure for additional development during the planning period;
- The availability of land suitable for urban development or for conversion to residential use, the availability of underutilized land, and opportunities for infill development increased residential densities, including the potential for increased residential development under alternative zoning ordinances and land use restrictions;
- Lands preserved or protected from urban development under existing federal or state programs;
- County policies to preserve prime agricultural land;
- Distribution of household growth assumed for purposes of a comparable period of regional transportation plans and opportunities to maximize the use of public transportation and the existing transportation infrastructure;
- Market demand for housing;
- Agreements between a county and cities to direct growth toward incorporated areas of the county;
- Loss of low income units in assisted housing developments as a result of mortgage prepayment, expiration of subsidy contracts, and the termination of use restrictions;
- The housing needs of farmworkers;
- The housing needs of universities; and
- Any other factor adopted by the COG.
- Requires each COG to survey each member jurisdiction and request the information necessary to allow for the development of the methodology described in 5) above, six months prior to developing the methodology.
- Requires public participation and access in drafting the methodology and in the process of drafting and adopting the allocation of the regional housing need, including at least one public hearing to receive oral and written comments.
- Requires each COG to explain in writing how each of the factors required to be incorporated in the methodology are incorporated and how they further the objectives required to be included in the regional housing needs plan.
- Requires each COG in addition to the factors listed in 5), to identity any existing local, regional or state incentives such as priority for funding to those local governments willing to accept a higher share of housing than proposed in the draft allocation plan.
- Requires a COG to adopt a final housing needs allocation methodology after the public comment period and make any revisions as a result of the public comments received.
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown.
COMMENTS:
Background: Housing element law requires local governments to adequately plan to meet their existing and projected housing needs including their share of the regional housing need. The housing element update process addresses the statewide concern of providing "decent housing and a suitable living environment for every California family," in part by facilitating increases in housing supply to accommodate the needs of the state's population and its growth. The law recognizes the most critical decisions regarding housing development occur at the local level within the context of the general plan. In order for the private sector to adequately address housing needs and demand, local governments must regularly update their general plans, zoning, and development standards to provide opportunities for, and not unduly constrain, housing development for all income groups.
Regional housing needs assessment (RHNA) for each city and county constitute a fundamental basis for housing element updates. The state projects new RHNA numbers every eight years, or in some rural areas every five years. RHNA for each city and county is a projection of additional housing units needed to accommodate existing households and projected household growth of all income levels by the end of the housing element planning period.
RHNAs establish minimum housing development capacity that cities and counties are to make available via their land use powers to accommodate growth within a planning period. RHNAs are assigned by four income categories as guideposts for each community to develop a mix of housing types for all economic segments of the population. The process is also known as "fair share" planning, as shares of the regional housing need are determined for constituent cities and counties of the affected region of the housing element update cycle. Regions are represented by COGs or counties, which are charged with preparing RHNA plans.
In consultation with each COG, HCD determines the housing needs for each region using a demographic method based on Department of Financing (DOF) population projections. While HCD forwards projections for the region, the distribution of the need within the region to individual cities and counties is subject to determination by the COG. Two years prior to a housing element revision, the COG develops a methodology for distributing the RNHA to jurisdictions within the region. The methodology must consider certain factors spelled out in statute. Local jurisdictions provide data to the COG that is used in the methodology to determine the distribution of housing need within the region. COGs allocate the RHNA to their city and county members in a draft allocation plan and each city and county has an opportunity to request revision of their needs allocation by the COG. The COG may revise the initial allocations, subject to maintaining the total regional need.
The methodology is required to consider the existing and projected jobs housing relationship; the opportunities and constraints to building housing in a jurisdiction; a comparison between household growth and regional transportation plans; market demand for housing; agreements to direct growth to unincorporated areas; the loss of assisted housing units due to expiring covenants or contracts; the housing needs of farmworkers; and housing generated by universities. In addition, the COG can consider any other factors it chooses.
The RNHA process has been criticized as being a political rather than a data driven process. COGs distribute the allocation by both the supporting data but also in some cases based on which jurisdictions are willing accept housing units. A component of the methodology used to determine the allocation of RNHA is a jurisdiction's willingness to accept a higher share of the proposed share of the RNHA. The Haas Institute at UC Berkeley published a study, "Unfair Share" Racial Disparities and Regional Housing Needs Allocation in the Bay Area," which found a relationship between the number of units allocated, adjusted for population size, and the racial composition of the city. Local governments with higher percentages of white residents were more likely to have received lower allocations of moderate and lower income housing.
SB 35 (Wiener), Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017, required that cities and counties streamline housing developments that include either 10% of units at or below 80% of AMI or 50% units at or below 80% of AMI. This new requirement has added additional weight to the RNHA process because the trigger for whether or not a jurisdiction must streamline is based on whether or not they have met their RNHA numbers for above moderate income (120% of AMI or above) or lower income (80% of AMI or below). Most jurisdictions have not met their lower income RNHA and are subject to streamlining if the developer meets the requirements of the bill, including that 50% of the units are restricted to lower income households. To staff's knowledge, two developments have requested streamlining in the state since the law went into effect on January 1, 2018.
Additional objectives: The regional housing needs plan is required to be consistent with several objectives including that each jurisdiction takes a share of the housing need for all income levels or their "fair share;" that the distribution promotes infill development and social equity; the promotion of an interregional relationship between jobs and housing; and where a jurisdiction has a high percentage of existing housing in an income level allocating a smaller amount in that income category. This bill would add additional objectives to the list including, increasing access to high opportunity for lower-income residents, avoiding displacement and affirmatively furthering fair housing.
In 2017, the Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) and HCD convened a group of independent organizations and research centers with the purpose of establishing a state fair housing taskforce. The first task for the task force was to assist TCAC and HCD in creating evidence-based approaches to increase access to opportunity for families with children living in housing subsidized by the Low-Income Housing Tax credit (LIHTC) program. TCAC and HCD asked the taskforce to create a statewide opportunity mapping tool that could be adopted to accompany the regulations to incentive development of large-family, new construction of developments with 9% LIHTC in neighborhoods whose characteristics have been shown by research to support childhood development and economic mobility for low-income families. The intent is to use this new mapping tool to direct and inform state policies to increase access for low-income families to high-resource neighborhoods. The committee may wish to consider whether there are other opportunities to integrate the data developed through the opportunity-maps into the RHNA methodology to achieve this goal and further the existing goal for social equity.
Additional transparency and state oversight: Public participation and access is required in developing the methodology and drafting and adopting the RNHA allocation. COGs are required to distribute the methodology and any underlying data and assumptions to cities, counties, and members of the public who request it. COGs are also required to hold at least one public hearing to receive comments on the proposed methodology. This bill would increase that to at least two public hearings.
Once the methodology is complete, COGs distribute a draft allocation to cities and counties in the region. Within 60 days of receiving the draft allocation, local governments may request a revision to the allocation based on comparable data. If the COG does not accept the proposed change, the local government can appeal the COGs decision; the COG then must review the appeal and explain how the allocation is consistent with the objectives and methodology for the RNHA. This bill would allow a housing organization, which is a non-profit whose mission is serving low-income households to also challenge the RNHA allocation. The bill also creates a process for local government, or housing organizations to appeal a COG's decision to HCD.
Purpose of this bill: According to the author, "AB 1771 provides for a more equitable, data-driven distribution of the housing need within regions, ensures greater transparency in the distribution process, and provides additional oversight to ensure that the process furthers statutory objectives. The bill would improve the RHNA distribution process by:
- Adding avoiding displacement, increasing access to opportunity, and affirmatively furthering fair housing to the list of statutory objectives.
- Adding additional data points to the distribution methodology, including overcrowding rates.
- Restricting a COG’s ability to use other factors beyond those listed in statute.
- Requiring HCD to determine whether a COG’s distribution methodology is consistent with the law.
- Allowing non-profit housing organizations to challenge the RHNA share assigned to one or more jurisdictions.
- Requiring HCD, rather than the COG, to hear appeals if a COG denies an initial challenge to one or more jurisdictions’ RHNA allocations. "
Arguments in support: According to the sponsors, California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation and Western Center on Law and Poverty, "while the RHNA distribution is supposed to be data-driven and founded in principals of fair housing and equity, unfortunately it can be influenced heavily by politics, resulting in low allocations to wealthier and often job-rich jurisdictions that could accommodate far more housing, particularly multifamily housing. The state has a number of laws on the books designed to ensure that housing gets built, but these laws generally only protect projects proposed on sites zoned for housing. When a jurisdiction gets a low RHNA number and thus has to zone very little land for housing, it frustrates the application of these laws and effectively allows that jurisdiction to remain off limits to housing construction."
Arguments in opposition: According to the California Building Industry Association, "while we appreciate the intent of this bill, and agree that the process of RNHA should be updated, the bill as currently drafted could result in a distinctively unbalanced approach to housing. There is a need for all types of housing projects across the state in order to keep pace with the demand. By favoring the production of below market rate housing, this proposal would ultimately result in fewer houses being built overall."
Committee amendments:
- Add a definition for "areas of high opportunity for lower-income residents" to mean areas that provide pathways to better lives, including through health, education, and employment.
- Revise the definition of housing organization as follows: (j) For purposes of this section, “housing organization” means a
nonprojectnonprofit organization whose primary mission includes providing or advocating for increased access to housing for low-income households. - Delete the requirement that the regional housing allocation plan "not undermine the intent of" the objectives and methodology.
Technical amendment:
On page 6, line 11, delete "and not undermine the intent of"
On page 12, line 29 delete reference to subsection (d) of Section 65594 and change to subsection (d) of Section 65584.
Double-Referred: If AB 1771 passes out of this committee, the bill will be referred to the Committee on Local Government.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation (co-sponsor)
Western Center on Law and Poverty (co-sponsor)
California Bicycle Coalition
California Housing Consortium
Disability Rights California
American Planning Association (support if amended)
Opposition
California Association of Councils of Government
California Building Industry Association
Analysis Prepared by: Lisa Engel / H. & C.D. / (916) 319-2085
Discussed in Hearing
Assembly Floor
Senate Floor
Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
Assembly Floor
Assembly Standing Committee on Local Government
Assembly Standing Committee on Housing and Community Development
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):