AB 778: Community development investment tax credits.
- Session Year: 2017-2018
- House: Assembly
Existing law imposes an annual tax on the gross premiums of an insurer, as defined, doing business in this state at specified rates. Existing law, until January 1, 2017, allows a credit under the Personal Income Tax Law, the Corporation Tax Law, and a credit against the tax imposed on an insurer in an amount equal to 20% of a qualified investment, as defined, made in a community development financial institution, as defined, but not to exceed, in the aggregate amount under all those laws, $50,000,000 per year and authorizes the California Organized Investment Network to certify investments for the credit until January 1, 2017. Existing law provides that if a qualified investment is reduced before the end of the 60th month, but not below $50,000, an amount equal to 20% of the total reduction for the year shall be added to the tax imposed on the taxpayer. Existing law also provides that if a qualified investment is withdrawn before the end of the 60th month and not reinvested in another community development financial institution within 60 days, the entire amount of any credit previously allowed for that taxable year is required to be added to the tax imposed on the taxpayer. These provisions are repealed on December 1, 2017.
This bill would establish similar credits under the Personal Income Tax Law, the Corporation Tax Law, and the tax imposed on an insurer for taxable years or years, as specified, beginning on or after January 1, 2017, and before January 1, 2022. The bill would, as compared to the tax credit that expired on January 1, 2017, require priority for the tax credit to be given to insurance company investors over all other tax credit investors and would instead require that the provision regarding withdrawal, without reinvestment, of a qualified investment also applies when a qualified investment is reduced. This bill would repeal these provisions on December 1, 2022.
This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Discussed in Hearing