SB 17: Health care: prescription drug costs.
- Session Year: 2017-2018
- House: Senate
- Latest Version Date: 2017-10-09
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance (DOI). Existing law requires health care service plans and health insurers to file specified rate information with DMHC or DOI, as applicable, for health care service plan contracts or health insurance policies in the individual or small group markets and for health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies in the large group market. Existing law requires health care service plans and health insurers to also disclose specified supporting information for the rate information described above. Existing law requires the DMHC and DOI, as applicable, to conduct an annual public meeting regarding large group rates within 3 months of posting that information.
This bill would require health care service plans or health insurers that file the above-described rate information to report to DMHC or DOI, on a date no later than the reporting of the rate information, specified cost information regarding covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs, dispensed as provided. DMHC and DOI would be required to compile the reported information into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums and publish the reports on their Internet Web sites by January 1 of each year. Except for the report, DMHC and DOI would be required to keep confidential all information provided pursuant to these provisions. The bill would also require health care service plans or health insurers that file the above-described rate information to disclose to DMHC and DOI with the rate information specified information regarding the relation of prescription drug costs to plan or insurer spending and premium charges. The bill would instead require DMHC and DOI to conduct an annual public meeting within 4 months of posting the rate information described above. Because a willful violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The bill would require a manufacturer of a prescription drug with a wholesale acquisition cost of more than $40 that is purchased or reimbursed by specified purchasers, including state agencies, health care service plans, health insurers, and pharmacy benefit managers, to notify the purchaser of an increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of a prescription drug if the increase in the wholesale acquisition cost for a course of therapy, as defined, exceeds a specified threshold. The bill would require that notice to be given at least 60 days prior to the planned effective date of the increase. Commencing no earlier than January 1, 2019, the bill would require the manufacturer to notify the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) of specified information relating to that increase in wholesale acquisition cost on a quarterly basis at a time and in a format prescribed by the office. The bill would require the manufacturer to notify OSHPD of specified information relating to the wholesale acquisition cost, marketing, and usage of a new prescription drug if the cost exceeds a specified threshold, and would require OSHPD to publish that information on its Internet Web site, as specified. The bill would require OSHPD to enforce the provisions requiring manufacturer reporting to OSHPD and would subject a manufacturer to liability for a civil penalty if the information described above is not reported. The bill would authorize OSHPD to adopt regulations or issue guidance for the implementation of these provisions. The bill would require the California Research Bureau to report to the Legislature on the implementation of these provisions, and would subject these provisions to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature, as specified.
Existing law establishes the California Health Data and Planning Fund within the office for the purpose of receiving and expending certain fee revenues. Existing law establishes the Managed Care Fund for the purpose of supporting the administration of DMHC. Existing law establishes the Insurance Fund for, among other things, the support of DOI as authorized in the annual Budget Act.
This bill would prohibit the use of any moneys in the fund from being used for the implementation of these provisions. The bill would provide that funding for the office to conduct the activities described above shall be provided, subject to appropriation by the Legislature, from transfers of moneys from the Managed Care Fund and the Insurance Fund, as specified.
This bill would provide that the above-described provisions are severable.
Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance (DOI). Existing law requires health care service plans and health insurers to file specified rate information with DMHC or DOI, as applicable, for health care service plan contracts or health insurance policies in the individual or small group markets and for health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies in the large group market. Existing law requires health care service plans and health insurers to also disclose specified supporting information for the rate information described above. Existing law requires the DMHC and DOI, as applicable, to conduct an annual public meeting regarding large group rates within 3 months of posting that information.
This bill would require health care service plans or health insurers that file the above-described rate information to report to DMHC or DOI, on a date no later than the reporting of the rate information, specified cost information regarding covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs, dispensed as provided. DMHC and DOI would be required to compile the reported information into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums and publish the reports on their Internet Web sites by January 1 of each year. Except for the report, DMHC and DOI would be required to keep confidential all information provided pursuant to these provisions. The bill would also require health care service plans or health insurers that file the above-described rate information to disclose to DMHC and DOI with the rate information specified information regarding the relation of prescription drug costs to plan or insurer spending and premium charges. The bill would instead require DMHC and DOI to conduct an annual public meeting within 4 months of posting the rate information described above. Because a willful violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The bill would require a manufacturer of a prescription drug with a wholesale acquisition cost of more than $40 that is purchased or reimbursed by specified purchasers, including state agencies, health care service plans, health insurers, and pharmacy benefit managers, to notify the purchaser of an increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of a prescription drug if the increase in the wholesale acquisition cost for a course of therapy, as defined, exceeds a specified threshold. The bill would require that notice to be given at least 60 days prior to the planned effective date of the increase. Commencing no earlier than January 1, 2019, the bill would require the manufacturer to notify the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) of specified information relating to that increase in wholesale acquisition cost on a quarterly basis at a time and in a format prescribed by the office. The bill would require the manufacturer to notify OSHPD of specified information relating to the wholesale acquisition cost, marketing, and usage of a new prescription drug if the cost exceeds a specified threshold, and would require OSHPD to publish that information on its Internet Web site, as specified. The bill would require OSHPD to enforce the provisions requiring manufacturer reporting to OSHPD and would subject a manufacturer to liability for a civil penalty if the information described above is not reported. The bill would authorize OSHPD to adopt regulations or issue guidance for the implementation of these provisions. The bill would require the California Research Bureau to report to the Legislature on the implementation of these provisions, and would subject these provisions to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature, as specified.
Existing law establishes the California Health Data and Planning Fund within the office for the purpose of receiving and expending certain fee revenues. Existing law establishes the Managed Care Fund for the purpose of supporting the administration of DMHC. Existing law establishes the Insurance Fund for, among other things, the support of DOI as authorized in the annual Budget Act.
This bill would prohibit the use of any moneys in the fund from being used for the implementation of these provisions. The bill would provide that funding for the office to conduct the activities described above shall be provided, subject to appropriation by the Legislature, from transfers of moneys from the Managed Care Fund and the Insurance Fund, as specified.
This bill would provide that the above-described provisions are severable.
Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance (DOI). Existing law requires health care service plans and health insurers to file specified rate information with DMHC or DOI, as applicable, for health care service plan contracts or health insurance policies in the individual or small group markets and for health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies in the large group market. Existing law requires health care service plans and health insurers to also disclose specified supporting information for the rate information described above. Existing law requires the DMHC and DOI, as applicable, to conduct an annual public meeting regarding large group rates within 3 months of posting that information.
This bill would require health care service plans or health insurers that file the above-described rate information to report to DMHC or DOI, on a date no later than the reporting of the rate information, specified cost information regarding covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs, dispensed as provided. DMHC and DOI would be required to compile the reported information into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums and publish the reports on their Internet Web sites by January 1 of each year. Except for the report, DMHC and DOI would be required to keep confidential all information provided pursuant to these provisions. The bill would also require health care service plans or health insurers that file the above-described rate information to disclose to DMHC and DOI with the rate information specified information regarding the relation of prescription drug costs to plan or insurer spending and premium charges. The bill would instead require DMHC and DOI to conduct an annual public meeting within 4 months of posting the rate information described above. Because a willful violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The bill would require a manufacturer of a prescription drug with a wholesale acquisition cost of more than $40 that is purchased or reimbursed by specified purchasers, including state agencies, health care service plans, health insurers, and pharmacy benefit managers, to notify the purchaser of an increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of a prescription drug if the increase in the wholesale acquisition cost for a course of therapy, as defined, exceeds a specified threshold. The bill would require that notice to be given at least 60 days prior to the planned effective date of the increase. The Commencing no earlier than January 1, 2019, the bill would require the manufacturer to notify the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) of specified information relating to that increase in wholesale acquisition cost at the time that the increase takes effect. on a quarterly basis at a time and in a format prescribed by the office. The bill would require the manufacturer to notify OSHPD of specified information relating to the wholesale acquisition cost, marketing, and usage of a new prescription drug if the cost exceeds a specified threshold, and would require OSHPD to publish that information on its Internet Web site, as specified. The bill would require OSHPD to enforce these provisions the provisions requiring manufacturer reporting to OSHPD and would subject a manufacturer to liability for a civil penalty if the information described above is not reported. The bill would authorize OSHPD to adopt regulations or issue guidance for the implementation of these provisions. The bill would provide that the above-described provisions are severable. The bill would require the California Research Bureau to report to the Legislature on the implementation of these provisions, and would subject these provisions to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature, as specified.
Existing law establishes the California Health Data and Planning Fund within the office for the purpose of receiving and expending certain fee revenues. Existing law establishes the Managed Care Fund for the purpose of supporting the administration of DMHC. Existing law establishes the Insurance Fund for, among other things, the support of DOI as authorized in the annual Budget Act.
This bill would prohibit the use of any moneys in the fund from being used for the implementation of these provisions. The bill would provide that funding for the office to conduct the activities described above shall be provided, subject to appropriation by the Legislature, from transfers of moneys from the Managed Care Fund and the Insurance Fund, as specified.
This bill would provide that the above-described provisions are severable.
Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance (DOI). Existing law requires health care service plans and health insurers to file specified rate information with DMHC or DOI, as applicable, for health care service plan contracts or health insurance policies in the individual or small group markets and for health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies in the large group market. Existing law requires health care service plans and health insurers to also disclose specified supporting information for the rate information described above. Existing law requires the DMHC and DOI, as applicable, to conduct an annual public meeting regarding large group rates within 3 months of posting that information.
This bill would require health care service plans or health insurers that file the above-described rate information to report to DMHC or DOI, on a date no later than the reporting of the rate information, specified cost information regarding covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs, dispensed as provided. DMHC and DOI would be required to compile the reported information into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums and publish the reports on their Internet Web sites by January 1 of each year. Except for the report, DMHC and DOI would be required to keep confidential all information provided pursuant to these provisions. The bill would also require health care service plans or health insurers that file the above-described rate information to disclose to DMHC and DOI with the rate information specified information regarding the relation of prescription drug costs to plan or insurer spending and premium charges. The bill would instead require DMHC and DOI to conduct an annual public meeting within 4 months of posting the rate information described above. Because a willful violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The bill would require a manufacturer of a prescription drug that is purchased or reimbursed by specified purchasers, including state agencies, health care service plans, health insurers, and pharmacy benefit managers, to notify the purchaser of an increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of a prescription drug if the wholesale acquisition cost exceeds a specified threshold. The bill would require that notice to be given at least 60 days prior to the planned effective date of the increase. The bill would require the manufacturer to notify the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) of specified information relating to that increase in wholesale acquisition cost at the time that the increase takes effect. The bill would require the manufacturer to notify OSHPD of specified information relating to the wholesale acquisition cost, marketing, and usage of a new prescription drug if the cost exceeds a specified threshold, and would require OSHPD to publish that information on its Internet Web site, as specified. The bill would require OSHPD to enforce these provisions and would subject a manufacturer to liability for a civil penalty if the information described above is not reported. The bill would authorize OSHPD to adopt regulations or issue guidance for the implementation of these provisions. The bill would provide that the above-described provisions are severable.
Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance (DOI). Existing law requires health care service plans and health insurers to file specified rate information with DMHC or DOI, as applicable, for health care service plan contracts or health insurance policies in the individual or small group markets and for health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies in the large group market.
This bill would require health care service plans or health insurers that file the above-described rate information to report to DMHC or DOI, on a date no later than the reporting of the rate information, specified cost information regarding covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs, dispensed as provided. DMHC and DOI would be required to compile the reported information into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums and publish the reports on their Internet Web sites by January 1 of each year. Except for the report, DMHC and DOI would be required to keep confidential all information provided pursuant to these provisions. The bill would also require health care service plans or health insurers that file the above-described rate information to disclose to DMHC and DOI with the rate information specified information regarding the relation of prescription drug costs to plan or insurer spending and premium charges. Because a willful violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The bill would require a manufacturer of a prescription drug that is purchased or reimbursed by specified purchasers, including state agencies, health care service plans, health insurers, and pharmacy benefit managers, to notify the purchaser of an increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of a prescription drug if the wholesale acquisition cost exceeds a specified threshold. The bill would require that notice to be given at least 90 60 days prior to the planned effective date of the increase. The bill would require the manufacturer to notify the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) of specified information relating to that increase in wholesale acquisition cost at the time that the increase takes effect. The bill would require the manufacturer to notify OSHPD of specified information relating to the wholesale acquisition cost, marketing, and usage of a new prescription drug if the cost exceeds a specified threshold, and would require OSHPD to publish that information on its Internet Web site, as specified. The bill would require OSHPD to enforce these provisions and would subject a manufacturer to liability for a civil penalty if the information described above is not reported. The bill would authorize OSHPD to adopt regulations or issue guidance for the implementation of these provisions.
Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance (DOI). Existing law requires health care service plans and health insurers to file specified rate information with DMHC or DOI, as applicable, for health care service plan contracts or health insurance policies in the individual or small group markets and for health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies in the large group market.
This bill would require health care service plans or health insurers that file the above-described rate information to report to DMHC or DOI, on a date no later than the reporting of the rate information, specified cost information regarding covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs, dispensed as provided. DMHC and DOI would be required to compile the reported information into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums and publish the reports on their Internet Web sites by January 1 of each year. Except for the report, DMHC and DOI would be required to keep confidential all information provided pursuant to these provisions. The bill would also require health care service plans or health insurers that file the above-described rate information to disclose to DMHC and DOI with the rate information specified information regarding the relation of prescription drug costs to plan or insurer spending and premium charges. Because a willful violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The bill would require a manufacturer of a prescription drug that is purchased or reimbursed by specified purchasers, including state agencies, health care service plans, health insurers, and pharmacy benefit managers, to notify the purchaser of an increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of a prescription drug if the wholesale acquisition cost of a prescription drug exceeds a specified threshold. The bill would require that notice to be given at least 90 days prior to the planned effective date of the increase. The bill would require the manufacturer to notify the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) of specified information relating to that increase in wholesale acquisition cost at the time that the increase takes effect. The bill would require the manufacturer to notify OSHPD of specified information relating to the wholesale acquisition cost cost, marketing, and usage of a new prescription drug if the cost exceeds a specified threshold. threshold, and would require OSHPD to publish that information on its Internet Web site, as specified. The bill would require OSHPD to enforce these provisions and would subject a manufacturer to liability for a civil penalty if the information described above is not reported. The bill would authorize OSHPD to adopt regulations or issue guidance for the implementation of these provisions.
Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance (DOI). Existing law requires health care service plans and health insurers to file specified rate information with DMHC or DOI, as applicable, for health care service plan contracts or health insurance policies in the individual or small group markets and for health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies in the large group market.
This bill would require health care service plans or health insurers that file the above-described rate information to report to DMHC or DOI, on a date no later than the reporting of the rate information, specified cost information regarding covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs, dispensed as provided. DMHC and DOI would be required to compile the reported information into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums and publish the reports on their Internet Web sites by January 1 of each year. Except for the report, DMHC and DOI would be required to keep confidential all information provided pursuant to these provisions. The bill would also require health care service plans or health insurers that file the above-described rate information to disclose to DMHC and DOI with the rate information specified information regarding the relation of prescription drug costs to plan or insurer spending and premium charges. Because a willful violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The bill would require a manufacturer of a prescription drug that is purchased or reimbursed by specified purchasers, including state agencies, health care service plans, health insurers, and pharmacy benefit managers, to notify the purchaser if the wholesale acquisition cost of a prescription drug exceeds a specified threshold. The bill would require the manufacturer to notify the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) of specified information relating to that increase in wholesale acquisition cost at the time that the increase takes effect. The bill would require the manufacturer to notify OSHPD of specified information relating to the wholesale acquisition cost of a new prescription drug if the cost exceeds a specified threshold. The bill would require OSHPD to enforce these provisions and would subject a manufacturer to liability for a civil penalty if the information described above is not reported. The bill would authorize OSHPD to adopt regulations or issue guidance for the implementation of these provisions.
Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law establishes various programs to assist individuals with the purchase of prescription drugs at affordable prices, including, among other programs, the California Rx Prescription Drug Web Site Program and the Golden Bear State Pharmacy Assistance Program.This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation requiring public and private purchasers of health care and health care coverage be given advance notice of price increases for the costs of prescription drugs in order to further the ability to predict and manage these costs and the public be given information about the justification, if any, for the prices of newly emerging medications and price increases for existing prescription drugs. This bill would include the findings and declarations of the Legislature in support of its intent.Existing law establishes various programs to assist individuals with the purchase of prescription drugs at affordable prices, including, among other programs, the California Rx Prescription Drug Web Site Program and the Golden Bear State Pharmacy Assistance Program.
This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation requiring public and private purchasers of health care and health care coverage be given advance notice of price increases for the costs of prescription drugs in order to further the ability to predict and manage these costs and the public be given information about the justification, if any, for the prices of newly emerging medications and price increases for existing prescription drugs. This bill would include the findings and declarations of the Legislature in support of its intent.
(a)(1)A health care service plan that reports rate information pursuant to Section 1385.03 or 1385.045 shall report the information described in paragraph (2) to the department no later than October 1 of each year, beginning October 1, 2018.
(2)For all covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be reported:
(A)The 25 most frequently prescribed drugs.
(B)The 25 most costly drugs by total annual plan spending.
(C)The 25 drugs with the highest year-over-year increase in total annual plan spending.
(b)The department shall compile the information reported pursuant to subdivision (a) into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. The data in the report shall be aggregated and shall not reveal information specific to individual health care service plans.
(c)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
(d)By January 1 of each year, beginning January 1, 2019, the department shall publish on its Internet Web site the report required pursuant to subdivision (b).
(e)After the report required in subdivision (b) is released, the department shall include the report as part of the public meeting required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 1385.045.
(f)Except for the report required pursuant to subdivision (b), the department shall keep confidential all of the information provided to the department pursuant to this section, and the information shall be protected from public disclosure.
SEC. 2.Section 1385.045 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1385.045.(a)For large group health care service plan contracts, each health plan shall file with the department the weighted average rate increase for all large group benefit designs during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following calendar year. The average shall be weighted by the number of enrollees in each large group benefit design in the plans large group market and adjusted to the most commonly sold large group benefit design by enrollment during the 12-month period. For the purposes of this section, the large group benefit design includes, but is not limited to, benefits such as basic health care services and prescription drugs. The large group benefit design shall not include cost sharing, including, but not limited to, deductibles, copays, and coinsurance.
(b)(1)A plan shall also submit any other information required pursuant to any regulation adopted by the department to comply with this article.
(2)The department shall conduct an annual public meeting regarding large group rates within four months of posting the aggregate information described in this section in order to permit a public discussion of the reasons for the changes in the rates, benefits, and cost sharing in the large group market. The meeting shall be held in either the Los Angeles area or the San Francisco Bay area.
(c)A health care service plan subject to subdivision (a) shall also disclose the following for the aggregate rate information for the large group market submitted under this section:
(1)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, number and percentage of rate changes reviewed by the following:
(A)Plan year.
(B)Segment type, including whether the rate is community rated, in whole or in part.
(C)Product type.
(D)Number of enrollees.
(E)The number of products sold that have materially different benefits, cost sharing, or other elements of benefit design.
(2)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, any factors affecting the base rate, and the actuarial basis for those factors, including all of the following:
(A)Geographic region.
(B)Age, including age rating factors.
(C)Occupation.
(D)Industry.
(E)Health status factors, including, but not limited to, experience and utilization.
(F)Employee, and employee and dependents, including a description of the family composition used.
(G)Enrollees share of premiums.
(H)Enrollees cost sharing, including cost sharing for prescription drugs.
(I)Covered benefits in addition to basic health care services, as defined in Section 1345, and other benefits mandated under this article.
(J)Which market segment, if any, is fully experience rated and which market segment, if any, is in part experience rated and in part community rated.
(K)Any other factor that affects the rate that is not otherwise specified.
(3)(A)The plans overall annual medical trend factor assumptions for all benefits and by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology for the applicable 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year. A health plan that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the enrollees of the plan shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories, to the maximum extent possible, that are the same as, or similar to, those used by other plans.
(B)The amount of the projected trend separately attributable to the use of services, price inflation, and fees and risk for annual plan contract trends by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology. A health plan that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the enrollees of the plan shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories that are, to the maximum extent possible, the same or similar to those used by other plans.
(C)A comparison of the aggregate per enrollee per month costs and rate of changes over the last five years for each of the following:
(i)Premiums.
(ii)Claims costs, if any.
(iii)Administrative expenses.
(iv)Taxes and fees.
(D)Any changes in enrollee cost sharing over the prior year associated with the submitted rate information, including both of the following:
(i)Actual copays, coinsurance, deductibles, annual out of pocket maximums, and any other cost sharing by the benefit categories determined by the department.
(ii)Any aggregate changes in enrollee cost sharing over the prior years as measured by the weighted average actuarial value, weighted by the number of enrollees.
(E)Any changes in enrollee benefits over the prior year, including a description of benefits added or eliminated, as well as any aggregate changes, as measured as a percentage of the aggregate claims costs, listed by the categories determined by the department.
(F)Any cost containment and quality improvement efforts since the plans prior years information pursuant to this section for the same category of health benefit plan. To the extent possible, the plan shall describe any significant new health care cost containment and quality improvement efforts and provide an estimate of potential savings together with an estimated cost or savings for the projection period.
(G)The number of products covered by the information that incurred the excise tax paid by the health plan.
(4)(A)For covered prescription generic drugs excluding specialty generic drugs, prescription brand name drugs excluding specialty drugs, and prescription brand name and generic specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be disclosed:
(i)The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drug costs for the prior year for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(ii)The year-over-year increase, as a percentage, in per-member, per-month total health plan spending for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(iii)The year-over-year increase in per-member, per-month costs for drug prices compared to other components of the health care premium.
(iv)The specialty tier formulary list.
(B)The plan shall include the percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drugs administered in a doctors office that are covered under the medical benefit as separate from the pharmacy benefit, if available.
(C)(i)The plan shall include information on its use of a pharmacy benefit manager, if any, including which components of the prescription drug coverage described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) are managed by the pharmacy benefit manager.
(ii)The plan shall also include the name or names of the pharmacy benefit manager, or managers if the plan uses more than one.
(d)The information required pursuant to this section shall be submitted to the department on or before October 1, 2018, and on or before October 1 annually thereafter. Information submitted pursuant to this section is subject to Section 1385.07.
(e)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
SEC. 3.Section 127280 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:127280.(a)Every health facility licensed pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 1250) of Division 2, except a health facility owned and operated by the state, shall each year be charged a fee established by the office consistent with the requirements of this section.
(b)Commencing in calendar year 2004, every freestanding ambulatory surgery clinic as defined in Section 128700, shall each year be charged a fee established by the office consistent with the requirements of this section.
(c)The fee structure shall be established each year by the office to produce revenues equal to the appropriation made in the annual Budget Act or another statute to pay for the functions required to be performed by the office pursuant to this chapter, Article 2 (commencing with Section 127340) of Chapter 2, or Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 128675) of Part 5, and to pay for any other health-related programs administered by the office. The fee shall be due on July 1 and delinquent on July 31 of each year.
(d)The fee for a health facility that is not a hospital, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 128700, shall be not more than 0.035 percent of the gross operating cost of the facility for the provision of health care services for its last fiscal year that ended on or before June 30 of the preceding calendar year.
(e)The fee for a hospital, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 128700, shall be not more than 0.035 percent of the gross operating cost of the facility for the provision of health care services for its last fiscal year that ended on or before June 30 of the preceding calendar year.
(f)(1)The fee for a freestanding ambulatory surgery clinic shall be established at an amount equal to the number of ambulatory surgery data records submitted to the office pursuant to Section 128737 for encounters in the preceding calendar year multiplied by not more than fifty cents ($0.50).
(2)(A)For the calendar year 2004 only, a freestanding ambulatory surgery clinic shall estimate the number of records it will file pursuant to Section 128737 for the calendar year 2004 and shall report that number to the office by March 12, 2004. The estimate shall be as accurate as possible. The fee in the calendar year 2004 shall be established initially at an amount equal to the estimated number of records reported multiplied by fifty cents ($0.50) and shall be due on July 1 and delinquent on July 31, 2004.
(B)The office shall compare the actual number of records filed by each freestanding clinic for the calendar year 2004 pursuant to Section 128737 with the estimated number of records reported pursuant to subparagraph (A). If the actual number reported is less than the estimated number reported, the office shall reduce the fee of the clinic for calendar year 2005 by the amount of the difference multiplied by fifty cents ($0.50). If the actual number reported exceeds the estimated number reported, the office shall increase the fee of the clinic for calendar year 2005 by the amount of the difference multiplied by fifty cents ($0.50) unless the actual number reported is greater than 120 percent of the estimated number reported, in which case the office shall increase the fee of the clinic for calendar year 2005 by the amount of the difference, up to and including 120 percent of the estimated number, multiplied by fifty cents ($0.50), and by the amount of the difference in excess of 120 percent of the estimated number multiplied by one dollar ($1).
(g)There is hereby established the California Health Data and Planning Fund within the office for the purpose of receiving and expending fee revenues collected pursuant to this chapter.
(h)Any amounts raised by the collection of the special fees provided for by subdivisions (d), (e), and (f) that are not required to meet appropriations in the Budget Act for the current fiscal year shall remain in the California Health Data and Planning Fund and shall be available to the office in succeeding years when appropriated by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act or another statute, for expenditure under the provisions of this chapter, Article 2 (commencing with Section 127340) of Chapter 2, and Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 128675) of Part 5, or for any other health-related programs administered by the office, and shall reduce the amount of the special fees that the office is authorized to establish and charge. In no event, however, shall those amounts be used for programs administered by the office pursuant to Sections 127676, 127679, 127681, 127683, and 127685, that become effective on or after January 1, 2019.
(i)(1)No health facility liable for the payment of fees required by this section shall be issued a license or have an existing license renewed unless the fees are paid. A new, previously unlicensed, health facility shall be charged a pro rata fee to be established by the office during the first year of operation.
(2)The license of any health facility, against which the fees required by this section are charged, shall be revoked, after notice and hearing, if it is determined by the office that the fees required were not paid within the time prescribed by subdivision (c).
(j)This section shall become operative on January 1, 2002.
SEC. 4.Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 127675) is added to Part 2 of Division 107 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:9.Prescription Drug Pricing for Purchasers127675.(a)This chapter shall apply to a manufacturer of a prescription drug that is purchased or reimbursed by any of the following:
(1)A state purchaser in California, including, but not limited to, the Public Employees Retirement System, the State Department of Health Care Services, the Department of General Services, and the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, or an entity acting on behalf of a state purchaser.
(2)A licensed health care service plan.
(3)A health insurer holding a valid outstanding certificate of authority from the Insurance Commissioner.
(4)A pharmacy benefit manager as defined in subdivision (j) of Section 4430 of the Business and Professions Code.
(b)For the purposes of this chapter, the term office shall mean the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development.
127676.(a)The Legislature finds and declares that the State of California has a substantial public interest in the price and cost of prescription drugs. California is a major purchaser through the Public Employees Retirement System, the State Department of Health Care Services, the Department of General Services, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and other entities acting on behalf of a state purchaser. California also provides major tax expenditures through the tax exclusion of employer sponsored coverage and tax deductibility of coverage purchased by individuals, as well as tax deductibility of excess health care costs for individuals and families.
(b)(1)It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this chapter to provide notice and disclosure of information relating to the cost and pricing of prescription drugs in order to provide accountability to the state for prescription drug pricing.
(2)It is further the intent of the Legislature to permit a manufacturer of a prescription drug to voluntarily make pricing decisions regarding a prescription drug, including any price increases. It is further the intent of the Legislature to permit purchasers, both public and private, as well as pharmacy benefit managers, to negotiate discounts and rebates consistent with existing state and federal law.
127677.(a)A manufacturer of a prescription drug with a wholesale acquisition cost of more than forty dollars ($40) for a course of therapy shall notify each purchaser described in Section 127675 if the increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of a prescription drug is more than 16 percent, including the proposed increase and the cumulative increases that occurred within the previous two calendar years prior to the current year. For purposes of this section, a course of therapy is defined as either of the following:
(1)The recommended daily dosage units of a prescription drug pursuant to its prescribing label as approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration for 30 days.
(2)The recommended daily dosage units of a prescription drug pursuant to its prescribing label as approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration for a normal course of treatment that is less than 30 days.
(b)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall be provided in writing at least 60 days prior to the planned effective date of the increase.
(c)(1)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall include the date of the increase, the current wholesale acquisition cost of the prescription drug, and the dollar amount of the future increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of the prescription drug.
(2)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall include a statement regarding whether a change or improvement in the drug necessitates the price increase. If so, the manufacturer shall describe the change or improvement.
(d)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall be provided to each state purchaser and other purchasers described in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (a) of Section 127675 if a purchaser registers with the office for the purpose of this notification. The office shall make available to manufacturers a list of registered purchasers for the purpose of this notification.
(e)If a pharmacy benefit manager receives a notice of an increase in wholesale acquisition cost consistent with subdivision (a), it shall notify its large contracting public and private purchasers of the increase. For the purposes of this section, a large purchaser means a purchaser that provides coverage to more than 500 covered lives.
127679.(a)On a quarterly basis at a time prescribed by the office and in a format prescribed by the office, commencing no earlier than January 1, 2019, a manufacturer shall report to the office all of the following information for each drug for which an increase in wholesale acquisition cost is described in Section 127677:
(1)A description of the specific financial and nonfinancial factors used to make the decision to increase the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug and the amount of the increase, including, but not limited to, an explanation of how these factors explain the increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug.
(2)A schedule of wholesale acquisition cost increases for the drug for the previous five years if the drug was manufactured by the company.
(3)If the drug was acquired by the manufacturer within the previous five years, all of the following information:
(A)The wholesale acquisition cost of the drug at the time of acquisition and in the calendar year prior to acquisition.
(B)The name of the company from which the drug was acquired, the date acquired, and the purchase price.
(C)The year the drug was introduced to market and the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug at the time of introduction.
(4)The patent expiration date of the drug if it is under patent.
(5)If the drug is a multiple source drug, an innovator multiple source drug, a noninnovator multiple source drug, or a single source drug, as defined in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (7) of subdivision (k) of Section 1396r8 of Title 42 of the United States Code.
(6)A description of the change or improvement in the drug, if any, that necessitates the price increase.
(7)Volume of sales of the manufacturers drug in the United States for the previous year.
(b)The manufacturer may limit the information reported pursuant to subdivision (a) to that which is otherwise in the public domain or publicly available.
(c)The office shall publish the information provided to it pursuant to this section on its Internet Web site on no less than a quarterly basis. The information shall be published within 60 days of receipt from a manufacturer. The information shall be published in a manner that identifies the information that is disclosed on a per-drug basis and shall not be aggregated in a manner that would not allow identification of the drug.
(d)The office shall be responsible for the enforcement of this section.
(e)A manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this chapter that does not report the information required pursuant to this section is liable for a civil penalty of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per day for every day after the reporting period described in this section that the required information is not reported.
(f)A civil penalty shall be assessed and recovered in a civil action brought by the office in the name of the people of the State of California. Assessment of a civil penalty may, at the request of any manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this section, be reviewed on appeal, and the penalty may be reduced or waived for good cause.
(g)Any money received by the office pursuant to this section shall be paid into the Managed Care Fund.
127681.(a)A manufacturer of a prescription drug shall notify the office in writing if it is introducing a new prescription drug to market at a wholesale acquisition cost that exceeds the threshold set for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)). The notice shall be provided in writing within three days after the release of the drug in the commercial market. A manufacturer may make this notification pending approval by the federal Food and Drug Administration, if commercial availability is expected within three days of approval.
(b)No later than 30 days after notification pursuant to this section, a manufacturer shall report all of the following information to the office in a format prescribed by the office:
(1)A description of the marketing and pricing plans used in the launch of the new drug in the United States and internationally.
(2)The estimated volume of patients that may be prescribed the drug.
(3)If the drug was granted breakthrough therapy designation or priority review by the federal Food and Drug Administration prior to final approval.
(4)The date and price of acquisition if the drug was not developed by the manufacturer.
(c)The manufacturer may limit the information reported pursuant to subdivision (b) to that which is otherwise in the public domain or publicly available.
(d)The office shall publish the information provided to it pursuant to this section on its Internet Web site on no less than a quarterly basis. The information shall be published in a manner that identifies the information that is disclosed on a per-drug basis and shall not be aggregated in a manner that would not allow identification of the drug.
(e)The office shall be responsible for the enforcement of this section.
(f)A manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this chapter that does not report the information required pursuant to this section is liable for a civil penalty of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per day for every day after the notification period described in this section that the required information is not reported.
(g)A civil penalty shall be assessed and recovered in a civil action brought by the office in the name of the people of the State of California. Assessment of a civil penalty may, at the request of any manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this section, be reviewed on appeal, and the penalty may be reduced or waived for good cause.
(h)Any money received by the office pursuant to this section shall be paid into the Managed Care Fund.
127683.(a)Funding for the actual and necessary expenses of the office to conduct the activities described in this section and in Sections 127676, 127679, 127681, and 127685, shall be provided, subject to appropriation by the Legislature, from transfers of moneys from the Managed Care Fund and the Insurance Fund.
(b)The share of funding from the Managed Care Fund shall be based on the number of covered lives in the state that are covered under plans regulated by the Department of Managed Health Care, including covered lives under Medi-Cal managed care, as determined by the Department of Managed Health Care, in proportion to the total number of all covered lives in the state.
(c)The share of funding to be provided from the Insurance Fund shall be based on the number of covered lives in the state that are covered under health insurance policies and benefit plans regulated by the Department of Insurance, including covered lives under Medicare supplement plans, as determined by the Department of Insurance, in proportion to the total number of all covered lives in the state.
127685.(a)The office may adopt regulations or issue guidance for the implementation of this chapter. All information that is required to be reported to the office pursuant to this chapter shall be reported in a form prescribed by the office, commencing in the first calendar quarter of 2019.
(b)The office may consult with the Department of Managed Health Care, the Department of Insurance, the California State Board of Pharmacy, and any state purchaser of prescription drugs, or an entity acting on behalf of a state purchaser, in issuing guidance or adopting necessary regulations pursuant to subdivision (a), in posting information on its Internet Web site pursuant to this chapter, and in taking any other action for the purpose of implementing this chapter.
127686.(a)By January 1, 2022, the California Research Bureau shall report to the Legislature on the implementation of this chapter, including, but not limited to, this chapters effectiveness in addressing the following goals:
(1)Promoting transparency in pharmaceutical pricing for the state and other payers.
(2)Enhancing understanding about pharmaceutical spending trends.
(3)Assisting the state and other payers in management of pharmaceutical drug costs.
(b)A report submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.
(c)Notwithstanding any other law, implementation of this chapter shall be subject to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature. The review shall be performed as if this chapter were scheduled to be repealed on January 1, 2023.
(d)This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2024, and as of that date is repealed.
SEC. 5.Section 10123.205 is added to the Insurance Code, to read:10123.205.(a)(1)A health insurer that reports rate information pursuant to Section 10181.3 or 10181.45 shall report the information described in paragraph (2) to the department no later than October 1 of each year, beginning October 1, 2018.
(2)For all covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be reported:
(A)The 25 most frequently prescribed drugs.
(B)The 25 most costly drugs by total annual plan spending.
(C)The 25 drugs with the highest year-over-year increase in total annual plan spending.
(b)The department shall compile the information reported pursuant to subdivision (a) into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. The data in the report shall be aggregated and shall not reveal information specific to individual health insurers.
(c)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
(d)By January 1 of each year, beginning January 1, 2018, the department shall publish on its Internet Web site the report required pursuant to subdivision (b).
(e)After the report required in subdivision (b) is released, the department shall include the report as part of the public meeting required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 10181.45.
(f)Except for the report required pursuant to subdivision (b), the department shall keep confidential all of the information provided to the department pursuant to this section, and the information shall be protected from public disclosure.
SEC. 6.Section 10181.45 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10181.45.(a)For large group health insurance policies, each health insurer shall file with the department the weighted average rate increase for all large group benefit designs during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following calendar year. The average shall be weighted by the number of insureds in each large group benefit design in the insurers large group market and adjusted to the most commonly sold large group benefit design by enrollment during the 12-month period. For the purposes of this section, the large group benefit design includes, but is not limited to, benefits such as basic health care services and prescription drugs. The large group benefit design shall not include cost sharing, including, but not limited to, deductibles, copays, and coinsurance.
(b)(1)A health insurer shall also submit any other information required pursuant to any regulation adopted by the department to comply with this article.
(2)The department shall conduct an annual public meeting regarding large group rates within four months of posting the aggregate information described in this section in order to permit a public discussion of the reasons for the changes in the rates, benefits, and cost sharing in the large group market. The meeting shall be held in either the Los Angeles area or the San Francisco Bay area.
(c)A health insurer subject to subdivision (a) shall also disclose the following for the aggregate rate information for the large group market submitted under this section:
(1)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, number and percentage of rate changes reviewed by the following:
(A)Plan year.
(B)Segment type, including whether the rate is community rated, in whole or in part.
(C)Product type.
(D)Number of insureds.
(E)The number of products sold that have materially different benefits, cost sharing, or other elements of benefit design.
(2)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, any factors affecting the base rate, and the actuarial basis for those factors, including all of the following:
(A)Geographic region.
(B)Age, including age rating factors.
(C)Occupation.
(D)Industry.
(E)Health status factors, including, but not limited to, experience and utilization.
(F)Employee, and employee and dependents, including a description of the family composition used.
(G)Insureds share of premiums.
(H)Insureds cost sharing, including cost sharing for prescription drugs.
(I)Covered benefits in addition to basic health care services, as defined in Section 1345 of the Health and Safety Code, and other benefits mandated under this article.
(J)Which market segment, if any, is fully experience rated and which market segment, if any, is in part experience rated and in part community rated.
(K)Any other factor that affects the rate that is not otherwise specified.
(3)(A)The insurers overall annual medical trend factor assumptions for all benefits and by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology for the applicable 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year. A health insurer that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the health insurers insureds shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories, to the maximum extent possible, that are the same or similar to those used by other insurers.
(B)The amount of the projected trend separately attributable to the use of services, price inflation, and fees and risk for annual policy trends by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology. A health insurer that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the insureds shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories that are, to the maximum extent possible, the same or similar to those used by other insurers.
(C)A comparison of the aggregate per insured per month costs and rate of changes over the last five years for each of the following:
(i)Premiums.
(ii)Claims costs, if any.
(iii)Administrative expenses.
(iv)Taxes and fees.
(D)Any changes in insured cost sharing over the prior year associated with the submitted rate information, including both of the following:
(i)Actual copays, coinsurance, deductibles, annual out of pocket maximums, and any other cost sharing by the benefit categories determined by the department.
(ii)Any aggregate changes in insured cost sharing over the prior years as measured by the weighted average actuarial value, weighted by the number of insureds.
(E)Any changes in insured benefits over the prior year, including a description of benefits added or eliminated as well as any aggregate changes as measured as a percentage of the aggregate claims costs, listed by the categories determined by the department.
(F)Any cost containment and quality improvement efforts made since the insurers prior years information pursuant to this section for the same category of health insurer. To the extent possible, the insurer shall describe any significant new health care cost containment and quality improvement efforts and provide an estimate of potential savings together with an estimated cost or savings for the projection period.
(G)The number of products covered by the information that incurred the excise tax paid by the health insurer.
(4)(A)For covered prescription generic drugs excluding specialty generic drugs, prescription brand name drugs excluding specialty drugs, and prescription brand name and generic specialty drugs dispensed at a pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be disclosed:
(i)The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drug costs for the prior year for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(ii)The year-over-year increase, as a percentage, in per-member, per-month total health insurer spending for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(iii)The year-over-year increase in per-member, per-month costs for drug prices compared to other components of the health care premium.
(iv)The specialty tier formulary list.
(B)The insurer shall include the percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drugs administered in a doctors office that are covered under the medical benefit as separate from the pharmacy benefit, if available.
(C)(i)The insurer shall include information on its use of a pharmacy benefit manager, if any, including which components of the prescription drug coverage described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) are managed by the pharmacy benefit manager.
(ii)The insurer shall also include the name or names of the pharmacy benefit manager, or managers if the insurer uses more than one.
(d)The information required pursuant to this section shall be submitted to the department on or before October 1, 2016, and on or before October 1 annually thereafter. Information submitted pursuant to this section is subject to Section 10181.7.
(e)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
SEC. 7.The provisions of this act are severable. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 8.The Legislature finds and declares that Sections 1 and 5 of this act, which add Section 1367.243 to the Health and Safety Code and Section 10123.205 to the Insurance Code, respectively, impose a limitation on the publics right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies within the meaning of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution. Pursuant to that constitutional provision, the Legislature makes the following findings to demonstrate the interest protected by this limitation and the need for protecting that interest:
In order to protect proprietary, confidential information regarding health care service plan and health insurer prescription drug utilization and spending information that is specific to the plan or insurer and to protect the integrity of the competitive market, it is necessary that this act limit the publics right of access to that information.
SEC. 9.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
(a)(1)A health care service plan that reports rate information pursuant to Section 1385.03 or 1385.045 shall report the information described in paragraph (2) to the department no later than October 1 of each year, beginning October 1, 2018.
(2)For all covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be reported:
(A)The 25 most frequently prescribed drugs.
(B)The 25 most costly drugs by total annual plan spending.
(C)The 25 drugs with the highest year-over-year increase in total annual plan spending.
(b)The department shall compile the information reported pursuant to subdivision (a) into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. The data in the report shall be aggregated and shall not reveal information specific to individual health care service plans.
(c)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
(d)By January 1 of each year, beginning January 1, 2019, the department shall publish on its Internet Web site the report required pursuant to subdivision (b).
(e)After the report required in subdivision (b) is released, the department shall include the report as part of the public meeting required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 1385.045.
(f)Except for the report required pursuant to subdivision (b), the department shall keep confidential all of the information provided to the department pursuant to this section, and the information shall be protected from public disclosure.
SEC. 2.Section 1385.045 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1385.045.(a)For large group health care service plan contracts, each health plan shall file with the department the weighted average rate increase for all large group benefit designs during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following calendar year. The average shall be weighted by the number of enrollees in each large group benefit design in the plans large group market and adjusted to the most commonly sold large group benefit design by enrollment during the 12-month period. For the purposes of this section, the large group benefit design includes, but is not limited to, benefits such as basic health care services and prescription drugs. The large group benefit design shall not include cost sharing, including, but not limited to, deductibles, copays, and coinsurance.
(b)(1)A plan shall also submit any other information required pursuant to any regulation adopted by the department to comply with this article.
(2)The department shall conduct an annual public meeting regarding large group rates within four months of posting the aggregate information described in this section in order to permit a public discussion of the reasons for the changes in the rates, benefits, and cost sharing in the large group market. The meeting shall be held in either the Los Angeles area or the San Francisco Bay area.
(c)A health care service plan subject to subdivision (a) shall also disclose the following for the aggregate rate information for the large group market submitted under this section:
(1)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, number and percentage of rate changes reviewed by the following:
(A)Plan year.
(B)Segment type, including whether the rate is community rated, in whole or in part.
(C)Product type.
(D)Number of enrollees.
(E)The number of products sold that have materially different benefits, cost sharing, or other elements of benefit design.
(2)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, any factors affecting the base rate, and the actuarial basis for those factors, including all of the following:
(A)Geographic region.
(B)Age, including age rating factors.
(C)Occupation.
(D)Industry.
(E)Health status factors, including, but not limited to, experience and utilization.
(F)Employee, and employee and dependents, including a description of the family composition used.
(G)Enrollees share of premiums.
(H)Enrollees cost sharing, including cost sharing for prescription drugs.
(I)Covered benefits in addition to basic health care services, as defined in Section 1345, and other benefits mandated under this article.
(J)Which market segment, if any, is fully experience rated and which market segment, if any, is in part experience rated and in part community rated.
(K)Any other factor that affects the rate that is not otherwise specified.
(3)(A)The plans overall annual medical trend factor assumptions for all benefits and by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology for the applicable 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year. A health plan that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the enrollees of the plan shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories, to the maximum extent possible, that are the same as, or similar to, those used by other plans.
(B)The amount of the projected trend separately attributable to the use of services, price inflation, and fees and risk for annual plan contract trends by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology. A health plan that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the enrollees of the plan shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories that are, to the maximum extent possible, the same or similar to those used by other plans.
(C)A comparison of the aggregate per enrollee per month costs and rate of changes over the last five years for each of the following:
(i)Premiums.
(ii)Claims costs, if any.
(iii)Administrative expenses.
(iv)Taxes and fees.
(D)Any changes in enrollee cost sharing over the prior year associated with the submitted rate information, including both of the following:
(i)Actual copays, coinsurance, deductibles, annual out of pocket maximums, and any other cost sharing by the benefit categories determined by the department.
(ii)Any aggregate changes in enrollee cost sharing over the prior years as measured by the weighted average actuarial value, weighted by the number of enrollees.
(E)Any changes in enrollee benefits over the prior year, including a description of benefits added or eliminated, as well as any aggregate changes, as measured as a percentage of the aggregate claims costs, listed by the categories determined by the department.
(F)Any cost containment and quality improvement efforts since the plans prior years information pursuant to this section for the same category of health benefit plan. To the extent possible, the plan shall describe any significant new health care cost containment and quality improvement efforts and provide an estimate of potential savings together with an estimated cost or savings for the projection period.
(G)The number of products covered by the information that incurred the excise tax paid by the health plan.
(4)(A)For covered prescription generic drugs excluding specialty generic drugs, prescription brand name drugs excluding specialty drugs, and prescription brand name and generic specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be disclosed:
(i)The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drug costs for the prior year for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(ii)The year-over-year increase, as a percentage, in per-member, per-month total health plan spending for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(iii)The year-over-year increase in per-member, per-month costs for drug prices compared to other components of the health care premium.
(iv)The specialty tier formulary list.
(B)The plan shall include the percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drugs administered in a doctors office that are covered under the medical benefit as separate from the pharmacy benefit, if available.
(C)(i)The plan shall include information on its use of a pharmacy benefit manager, if any, including which components of the prescription drug coverage described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) are managed by the pharmacy benefit manager.
(ii)The plan shall also include the name or names of the pharmacy benefit manager, or managers if the plan uses more than one.
(d)The information required pursuant to this section shall be submitted to the department on or before October 1, 2018, and on or before October 1 annually thereafter. Information submitted pursuant to this section is subject to Section 1385.07.
(e)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
SEC. 3.Section 127280 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:127280.(a)Every health facility licensed pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 1250) of Division 2, except a health facility owned and operated by the state, shall each year be charged a fee established by the office consistent with the requirements of this section.
(b)Commencing in calendar year 2004, every freestanding ambulatory surgery clinic as defined in Section 128700, shall each year be charged a fee established by the office consistent with the requirements of this section.
(c)The fee structure shall be established each year by the office to produce revenues equal to the appropriation made in the annual Budget Act or another statute to pay for the functions required to be performed by the office pursuant to this chapter, Article 2 (commencing with Section 127340) of Chapter 2, or Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 128675) of Part 5, and to pay for any other health-related programs administered by the office. The fee shall be due on July 1 and delinquent on July 31 of each year.
(d)The fee for a health facility that is not a hospital, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 128700, shall be not more than 0.035 percent of the gross operating cost of the facility for the provision of health care services for its last fiscal year that ended on or before June 30 of the preceding calendar year.
(e)The fee for a hospital, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 128700, shall be not more than 0.035 percent of the gross operating cost of the facility for the provision of health care services for its last fiscal year that ended on or before June 30 of the preceding calendar year.
(f)(1)The fee for a freestanding ambulatory surgery clinic shall be established at an amount equal to the number of ambulatory surgery data records submitted to the office pursuant to Section 128737 for encounters in the preceding calendar year multiplied by not more than fifty cents ($0.50).
(2)(A)For the calendar year 2004 only, a freestanding ambulatory surgery clinic shall estimate the number of records it will file pursuant to Section 128737 for the calendar year 2004 and shall report that number to the office by March 12, 2004. The estimate shall be as accurate as possible. The fee in the calendar year 2004 shall be established initially at an amount equal to the estimated number of records reported multiplied by fifty cents ($0.50) and shall be due on July 1 and delinquent on July 31, 2004.
(B)The office shall compare the actual number of records filed by each freestanding clinic for the calendar year 2004 pursuant to Section 128737 with the estimated number of records reported pursuant to subparagraph (A). If the actual number reported is less than the estimated number reported, the office shall reduce the fee of the clinic for calendar year 2005 by the amount of the difference multiplied by fifty cents ($0.50). If the actual number reported exceeds the estimated number reported, the office shall increase the fee of the clinic for calendar year 2005 by the amount of the difference multiplied by fifty cents ($0.50) unless the actual number reported is greater than 120 percent of the estimated number reported, in which case the office shall increase the fee of the clinic for calendar year 2005 by the amount of the difference, up to and including 120 percent of the estimated number, multiplied by fifty cents ($0.50), and by the amount of the difference in excess of 120 percent of the estimated number multiplied by one dollar ($1).
(g)There is hereby established the California Health Data and Planning Fund within the office for the purpose of receiving and expending fee revenues collected pursuant to this chapter.
(h)Any amounts raised by the collection of the special fees provided for by subdivisions (d), (e), and (f) that are not required to meet appropriations in the Budget Act for the current fiscal year shall remain in the California Health Data and Planning Fund and shall be available to the office in succeeding years when appropriated by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act or another statute, for expenditure under the provisions of this chapter, Article 2 (commencing with Section 127340) of Chapter 2, and Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 128675) of Part 5, or for any other health-related programs administered by the office, and shall reduce the amount of the special fees that the office is authorized to establish and charge. In no event, however, shall those amounts be used for programs administered by the office pursuant to Sections 127676, 127679, 127681, 127683, and 127685, that become effective on or after January 1, 2019.
(i)(1)No health facility liable for the payment of fees required by this section shall be issued a license or have an existing license renewed unless the fees are paid. A new, previously unlicensed, health facility shall be charged a pro rata fee to be established by the office during the first year of operation.
(2)The license of any health facility, against which the fees required by this section are charged, shall be revoked, after notice and hearing, if it is determined by the office that the fees required were not paid within the time prescribed by subdivision (c).
(j)This section shall become operative on January 1, 2002.
SEC. 4.Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 127675) is added to Part 2 of Division 107 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:9.Prescription Drug Pricing for Purchasers127675.(a)This chapter shall apply to a manufacturer of a prescription drug that is purchased or reimbursed by any of the following:
(1)A state purchaser in California, including, but not limited to, the Public Employees Retirement System, the State Department of Health Care Services, the Department of General Services, and the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, or an entity acting on behalf of a state purchaser.
(2)A licensed health care service plan.
(3)A health insurer holding a valid outstanding certificate of authority from the Insurance Commissioner.
(4)A pharmacy benefit manager as defined in subdivision (j) of Section 4430 of the Business and Professions Code.
(b)For the purposes of this chapter, the term office shall mean the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development.
127676.(a)The Legislature finds and declares that the State of California has a substantial public interest in the price and cost of prescription drugs. California is a major purchaser through the Public Employees Retirement System, the State Department of Health Care Services, the Department of General Services, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and other entities acting on behalf of a state purchaser. California also provides major tax expenditures through the tax exclusion of employer sponsored coverage and tax deductibility of coverage purchased by individuals, as well as tax deductibility of excess health care costs for individuals and families.
(b)(1)It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this chapter to provide notice and disclosure of information relating to the cost and pricing of prescription drugs in order to provide accountability to the state for prescription drug pricing.
(2)It is further the intent of the Legislature to permit a manufacturer of a prescription drug to voluntarily make pricing decisions regarding a prescription drug, including any price increases. It is further the intent of the Legislature to permit purchasers, both public and private, as well as pharmacy benefit managers, to negotiate discounts and rebates consistent with existing state and federal law.
127677.(a)A manufacturer of a prescription drug with a wholesale acquisition cost of more than forty dollars ($40) for a course of therapy shall notify each purchaser described in Section 127675 if the increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of a prescription drug is more than 16 percent, including the proposed increase and the cumulative increases that occurred within the previous two calendar years prior to the current year. For purposes of this section, a course of therapy is defined as either of the following:
(1)The recommended daily dosage units of a prescription drug pursuant to its prescribing label as approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration for 30 days.
(2)The recommended daily dosage units of a prescription drug pursuant to its prescribing label as approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration for a normal course of treatment that is less than 30 days.
(b)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall be provided in writing at least 60 days prior to the planned effective date of the increase.
(c)(1)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall include the date of the increase, the current wholesale acquisition cost of the prescription drug, and the dollar amount of the future increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of the prescription drug.
(2)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall include a statement regarding whether a change or improvement in the drug necessitates the price increase. If so, the manufacturer shall describe the change or improvement.
(d)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall be provided to each state purchaser and other purchasers described in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (a) of Section 127675 if a purchaser registers with the office for the purpose of this notification. The office shall make available to manufacturers a list of registered purchasers for the purpose of this notification.
(e)If a pharmacy benefit manager receives a notice of an increase in wholesale acquisition cost consistent with subdivision (a), it shall notify its large contracting public and private purchasers of the increase. For the purposes of this section, a large purchaser means a purchaser that provides coverage to more than 500 covered lives.
127679.(a)On a quarterly basis at a time prescribed by the office and in a format prescribed by the office, commencing no earlier than January 1, 2019, a manufacturer shall report to the office all of the following information for each drug for which an increase in wholesale acquisition cost is described in Section 127677:
(1)A description of the specific financial and nonfinancial factors used to make the decision to increase the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug and the amount of the increase, including, but not limited to, an explanation of how these factors explain the increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug.
(2)A schedule of wholesale acquisition cost increases for the drug for the previous five years if the drug was manufactured by the company.
(3)If the drug was acquired by the manufacturer within the previous five years, all of the following information:
(A)The wholesale acquisition cost of the drug at the time of acquisition and in the calendar year prior to acquisition.
(B)The name of the company from which the drug was acquired, the date acquired, and the purchase price.
(C)The year the drug was introduced to market and the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug at the time of introduction.
(4)The patent expiration date of the drug if it is under patent.
(5)If the drug is a multiple source drug, an innovator multiple source drug, a noninnovator multiple source drug, or a single source drug, as defined in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (7) of subdivision (k) of Section 1396r8 of Title 42 of the United States Code.
(6)A description of the change or improvement in the drug, if any, that necessitates the price increase.
(7)Volume of sales of the manufacturers drug in the United States for the previous year.
(b)The manufacturer may limit the information reported pursuant to subdivision (a) to that which is otherwise in the public domain or publicly available.
(c)The office shall publish the information provided to it pursuant to this section on its Internet Web site on no less than a quarterly basis. The information shall be published within 60 days of receipt from a manufacturer. The information shall be published in a manner that identifies the information that is disclosed on a per-drug basis and shall not be aggregated in a manner that would not allow identification of the drug.
(d)The office shall be responsible for the enforcement of this section.
(e)A manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this chapter that does not report the information required pursuant to this section is liable for a civil penalty of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per day for every day after the reporting period described in this section that the required information is not reported.
(f)A civil penalty shall be assessed and recovered in a civil action brought by the office in the name of the people of the State of California. Assessment of a civil penalty may, at the request of any manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this section, be reviewed on appeal, and the penalty may be reduced or waived for good cause.
(g)Any money received by the office pursuant to this section shall be paid into the Managed Care Fund.
127681.(a)A manufacturer of a prescription drug shall notify the office in writing if it is introducing a new prescription drug to market at a wholesale acquisition cost that exceeds the threshold set for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)). The notice shall be provided in writing within three days after the release of the drug in the commercial market. A manufacturer may make this notification pending approval by the federal Food and Drug Administration, if commercial availability is expected within three days of approval.
(b)No later than 30 days after notification pursuant to this section, a manufacturer shall report all of the following information to the office in a format prescribed by the office:
(1)A description of the marketing and pricing plans used in the launch of the new drug in the United States and internationally.
(2)The estimated volume of patients that may be prescribed the drug.
(3)If the drug was granted breakthrough therapy designation or priority review by the federal Food and Drug Administration prior to final approval.
(4)The date and price of acquisition if the drug was not developed by the manufacturer.
(c)The manufacturer may limit the information reported pursuant to subdivision (b) to that which is otherwise in the public domain or publicly available.
(d)The office shall publish the information provided to it pursuant to this section on its Internet Web site on no less than a quarterly basis. The information shall be published in a manner that identifies the information that is disclosed on a per-drug basis and shall not be aggregated in a manner that would not allow identification of the drug.
(e)The office shall be responsible for the enforcement of this section.
(f)A manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this chapter that does not report the information required pursuant to this section is liable for a civil penalty of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per day for every day after the notification period described in this section that the required information is not reported.
(g)A civil penalty shall be assessed and recovered in a civil action brought by the office in the name of the people of the State of California. Assessment of a civil penalty may, at the request of any manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this section, be reviewed on appeal, and the penalty may be reduced or waived for good cause.
(h)Any money received by the office pursuant to this section shall be paid into the Managed Care Fund.
127683.(a)Funding for the actual and necessary expenses of the office to conduct the activities described in this section and in Sections 127676, 127679, 127681, and 127685, shall be provided, subject to appropriation by the Legislature, from transfers of moneys from the Managed Care Fund and the Insurance Fund.
(b)The share of funding from the Managed Care Fund shall be based on the number of covered lives in the state that are covered under plans regulated by the Department of Managed Health Care, including covered lives under Medi-Cal managed care, as determined by the Department of Managed Health Care, in proportion to the total number of all covered lives in the state.
(c)The share of funding to be provided from the Insurance Fund shall be based on the number of covered lives in the state that are covered under health insurance policies and benefit plans regulated by the Department of Insurance, including covered lives under Medicare supplement plans, as determined by the Department of Insurance, in proportion to the total number of all covered lives in the state.
127685.(a)The office may adopt regulations or issue guidance for the implementation of this chapter. All information that is required to be reported to the office pursuant to this chapter shall be reported in a form prescribed by the office, commencing in the first calendar quarter of 2019.
(b)The office may consult with the Department of Managed Health Care, the Department of Insurance, the California State Board of Pharmacy, and any state purchaser of prescription drugs, or an entity acting on behalf of a state purchaser, in issuing guidance or adopting necessary regulations pursuant to subdivision (a), in posting information on its Internet Web site pursuant to this chapter, and in taking any other action for the purpose of implementing this chapter.
127686.(a)By January 1, 2022, the California Research Bureau shall report to the Legislature on the implementation of this chapter, including, but not limited to, this chapters effectiveness in addressing the following goals:
(1)Promoting transparency in pharmaceutical pricing for the state and other payers.
(2)Enhancing understanding about pharmaceutical spending trends.
(3)Assisting the state and other payers in management of pharmaceutical drug costs.
(b)A report submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.
(c)Notwithstanding any other law, implementation of this chapter shall be subject to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature. The review shall be performed as if this chapter were scheduled to be repealed on January 1, 2023.
(d)This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2024, and as of that date is repealed.
SEC. 5.Section 10123.205 is added to the Insurance Code, to read:10123.205.(a)(1)A health insurer that reports rate information pursuant to Section 10181.3 or 10181.45 shall report the information described in paragraph (2) to the department no later than October 1 of each year, beginning October 1, 2018.
(2)For all covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be reported:
(A)The 25 most frequently prescribed drugs.
(B)The 25 most costly drugs by total annual plan spending.
(C)The 25 drugs with the highest year-over-year increase in total annual plan spending.
(b)The department shall compile the information reported pursuant to subdivision (a) into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. The data in the report shall be aggregated and shall not reveal information specific to individual health insurers.
(c)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
(d)By January 1 of each year, beginning January 1, 2018, the department shall publish on its Internet Web site the report required pursuant to subdivision (b).
(e)After the report required in subdivision (b) is released, the department shall include the report as part of the public meeting required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 10181.45.
(f)Except for the report required pursuant to subdivision (b), the department shall keep confidential all of the information provided to the department pursuant to this section, and the information shall be protected from public disclosure.
SEC. 6.Section 10181.45 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10181.45.(a)For large group health insurance policies, each health insurer shall file with the department the weighted average rate increase for all large group benefit designs during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following calendar year. The average shall be weighted by the number of insureds in each large group benefit design in the insurers large group market and adjusted to the most commonly sold large group benefit design by enrollment during the 12-month period. For the purposes of this section, the large group benefit design includes, but is not limited to, benefits such as basic health care services and prescription drugs. The large group benefit design shall not include cost sharing, including, but not limited to, deductibles, copays, and coinsurance.
(b)(1)A health insurer shall also submit any other information required pursuant to any regulation adopted by the department to comply with this article.
(2)The department shall conduct an annual public meeting regarding large group rates within four months of posting the aggregate information described in this section in order to permit a public discussion of the reasons for the changes in the rates, benefits, and cost sharing in the large group market. The meeting shall be held in either the Los Angeles area or the San Francisco Bay area.
(c)A health insurer subject to subdivision (a) shall also disclose the following for the aggregate rate information for the large group market submitted under this section:
(1)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, number and percentage of rate changes reviewed by the following:
(A)Plan year.
(B)Segment type, including whether the rate is community rated, in whole or in part.
(C)Product type.
(D)Number of insureds.
(E)The number of products sold that have materially different benefits, cost sharing, or other elements of benefit design.
(2)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, any factors affecting the base rate, and the actuarial basis for those factors, including all of the following:
(A)Geographic region.
(B)Age, including age rating factors.
(C)Occupation.
(D)Industry.
(E)Health status factors, including, but not limited to, experience and utilization.
(F)Employee, and employee and dependents, including a description of the family composition used.
(G)Insureds share of premiums.
(H)Insureds cost sharing, including cost sharing for prescription drugs.
(I)Covered benefits in addition to basic health care services, as defined in Section 1345 of the Health and Safety Code, and other benefits mandated under this article.
(J)Which market segment, if any, is fully experience rated and which market segment, if any, is in part experience rated and in part community rated.
(K)Any other factor that affects the rate that is not otherwise specified.
(3)(A)The insurers overall annual medical trend factor assumptions for all benefits and by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology for the applicable 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year. A health insurer that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the health insurers insureds shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories, to the maximum extent possible, that are the same or similar to those used by other insurers.
(B)The amount of the projected trend separately attributable to the use of services, price inflation, and fees and risk for annual policy trends by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology. A health insurer that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the insureds shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories that are, to the maximum extent possible, the same or similar to those used by other insurers.
(C)A comparison of the aggregate per insured per month costs and rate of changes over the last five years for each of the following:
(i)Premiums.
(ii)Claims costs, if any.
(iii)Administrative expenses.
(iv)Taxes and fees.
(D)Any changes in insured cost sharing over the prior year associated with the submitted rate information, including both of the following:
(i)Actual copays, coinsurance, deductibles, annual out of pocket maximums, and any other cost sharing by the benefit categories determined by the department.
(ii)Any aggregate changes in insured cost sharing over the prior years as measured by the weighted average actuarial value, weighted by the number of insureds.
(E)Any changes in insured benefits over the prior year, including a description of benefits added or eliminated as well as any aggregate changes as measured as a percentage of the aggregate claims costs, listed by the categories determined by the department.
(F)Any cost containment and quality improvement efforts made since the insurers prior years information pursuant to this section for the same category of health insurer. To the extent possible, the insurer shall describe any significant new health care cost containment and quality improvement efforts and provide an estimate of potential savings together with an estimated cost or savings for the projection period.
(G)The number of products covered by the information that incurred the excise tax paid by the health insurer.
(4)(A)For covered prescription generic drugs excluding specialty generic drugs, prescription brand name drugs excluding specialty drugs, and prescription brand name and generic specialty drugs dispensed at a pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be disclosed:
(i)The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drug costs for the prior year for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(ii)The year-over-year increase, as a percentage, in per-member, per-month total health insurer spending for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(iii)The year-over-year increase in per-member, per-month costs for drug prices compared to other components of the health care premium.
(iv)The specialty tier formulary list.
(B)The insurer shall include the percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drugs administered in a doctors office that are covered under the medical benefit as separate from the pharmacy benefit, if available.
(C)(i)The insurer shall include information on its use of a pharmacy benefit manager, if any, including which components of the prescription drug coverage described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) are managed by the pharmacy benefit manager.
(ii)The insurer shall also include the name or names of the pharmacy benefit manager, or managers if the insurer uses more than one.
(d)The information required pursuant to this section shall be submitted to the department on or before October 1, 2016, and on or before October 1 annually thereafter. Information submitted pursuant to this section is subject to Section 10181.7.
(e)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
SEC. 7.The provisions of this act are severable. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 8.The Legislature finds and declares that Sections 1 and 5 of this act, which add Section 1367.243 to the Health and Safety Code and Section 10123.205 to the Insurance Code, respectively, impose a limitation on the publics right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies within the meaning of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution. Pursuant to that constitutional provision, the Legislature makes the following findings to demonstrate the interest protected by this limitation and the need for protecting that interest:
In order to protect proprietary, confidential information regarding health care service plan and health insurer prescription drug utilization and spending information that is specific to the plan or insurer and to protect the integrity of the competitive market, it is necessary that this act limit the publics right of access to that information.
SEC. 9.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
(a)(1)A health care service plan that reports rate information pursuant to Section 1385.03 or 1385.045 shall report the information described in paragraph (2) to the department no later than October 1 of each year, beginning October 1, 2018.
(2)For all covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be reported:
(A)The 25 most frequently prescribed drugs.
(B)The 25 most costly drugs by total annual plan spending.
(C)The 25 drugs with the highest year-over-year increase in total annual plan spending.
(b)The department shall compile the information reported pursuant to subdivision (a) into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. The data in the report shall be aggregated and shall not reveal information specific to individual health care service plans.
(c)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
(d)By January 1 of each year, beginning January 1, 2019, the department shall publish on its Internet Web site the report required pursuant to subdivision (b).
(e)After the report required in subdivision (b) is released, the department shall include the report as part of the public meeting required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 1385.045.
(f)Except for the report required pursuant to subdivision (b), the department shall keep confidential all of the information provided to the department pursuant to this section, and the information shall be protected from public disclosure.
SEC. 2.Section 1385.045 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1385.045.(a)For large group health care service plan contracts, each health plan shall file with the department the weighted average rate increase for all large group benefit designs during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following calendar year. The average shall be weighted by the number of enrollees in each large group benefit design in the plans large group market and adjusted to the most commonly sold large group benefit design by enrollment during the 12-month period. For the purposes of this section, the large group benefit design includes, but is not limited to, benefits such as basic health care services and prescription drugs. The large group benefit design shall not include cost sharing, including, but not limited to, deductibles, copays, and coinsurance.
(b)(1)A plan shall also submit any other information required pursuant to any regulation adopted by the department to comply with this article.
(2)The department shall conduct an annual public meeting regarding large group rates within four months of posting the aggregate information described in this section in order to permit a public discussion of the reasons for the changes in the rates, benefits, and cost sharing in the large group market. The meeting shall be held in either the Los Angeles area or the San Francisco Bay area.
(c)A health care service plan subject to subdivision (a) shall also disclose the following for the aggregate rate information for the large group market submitted under this section:
(1)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, number and percentage of rate changes reviewed by the following:
(A)Plan year.
(B)Segment type, including whether the rate is community rated, in whole or in part.
(C)Product type.
(D)Number of enrollees.
(E)The number of products sold that have materially different benefits, cost sharing, or other elements of benefit design.
(2)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, any factors affecting the base rate, and the actuarial basis for those factors, including all of the following:
(A)Geographic region.
(B)Age, including age rating factors.
(C)Occupation.
(D)Industry.
(E)Health status factors, including, but not limited to, experience and utilization.
(F)Employee, and employee and dependents, including a description of the family composition used.
(G)Enrollees share of premiums.
(H)Enrollees cost sharing, including cost sharing for prescription drugs.
(I)Covered benefits in addition to basic health care services, as defined in Section 1345, and other benefits mandated under this article.
(J)Which market segment, if any, is fully experience rated and which market segment, if any, is in part experience rated and in part community rated.
(K)Any other factor that affects the rate that is not otherwise specified.
(3)(A)The plans overall annual medical trend factor assumptions for all benefits and by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology for the applicable 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year. A health plan that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the enrollees of the plan shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories, to the maximum extent possible, that are the same as, or similar to, those used by other plans.
(B)The amount of the projected trend separately attributable to the use of services, price inflation, and fees and risk for annual plan contract trends by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology. A health plan that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the enrollees of the plan shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories that are, to the maximum extent possible, the same or similar to those used by other plans.
(C)A comparison of the aggregate per enrollee per month costs and rate of changes over the last five years for each of the following:
(i)Premiums.
(ii)Claims costs, if any.
(iii)Administrative expenses.
(iv)Taxes and fees.
(D)Any changes in enrollee cost sharing over the prior year associated with the submitted rate information, including both of the following:
(i)Actual copays, coinsurance, deductibles, annual out of pocket maximums, and any other cost sharing by the benefit categories determined by the department.
(ii)Any aggregate changes in enrollee cost sharing over the prior years as measured by the weighted average actuarial value, weighted by the number of enrollees.
(E)Any changes in enrollee benefits over the prior year, including a description of benefits added or eliminated, as well as any aggregate changes, as measured as a percentage of the aggregate claims costs, listed by the categories determined by the department.
(F)Any cost containment and quality improvement efforts since the plans prior years information pursuant to this section for the same category of health benefit plan. To the extent possible, the plan shall describe any significant new health care cost containment and quality improvement efforts and provide an estimate of potential savings together with an estimated cost or savings for the projection period.
(G)The number of products covered by the information that incurred the excise tax paid by the health plan.
(4)(A)For covered prescription generic drugs excluding specialty generic drugs, prescription brand name drugs excluding specialty drugs, and prescription brand name and generic specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be disclosed:
(i)The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drug costs for the prior year for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(ii)The year-over-year increase, as a percentage, in per-member, per-month total health plan spending for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(iii)The year-over-year increase in per-member, per-month costs for drug prices compared to other components of the health care premium.
(iv)The specialty tier formulary list.
(B)The plan shall include the percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drugs administered in a doctors office that are covered under the medical benefit as separate from the pharmacy benefit, if available.
(C)(i)The plan shall include information on its use of a pharmacy benefit manager, if any, including which components of the prescription drug coverage described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) are managed by the pharmacy benefit manager.
(ii)The plan shall also include the name or names of the pharmacy benefit manager, or managers if the plan uses more than one.
(d)The information required pursuant to this section shall be submitted to the department on or before October 1, 2018, and on or before October 1 annually thereafter. Information submitted pursuant to this section is subject to Section 1385.07.
(e)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
SEC. 3.Section 127280 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:127280.(a)Every health facility licensed pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 1250) of Division 2, except a health facility owned and operated by the state, shall each year be charged a fee established by the office consistent with the requirements of this section.
(b)Commencing in calendar year 2004, every freestanding ambulatory surgery clinic as defined in Section 128700, shall each year be charged a fee established by the office consistent with the requirements of this section.
(c)The fee structure shall be established each year by the office to produce revenues equal to the appropriation made in the annual Budget Act or another statute to pay for the functions required to be performed by the office pursuant to this chapter, Article 2 (commencing with Section 127340) of Chapter 2, or Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 128675) of Part 5, and to pay for any other health-related programs administered by the office. The fee shall be due on July 1 and delinquent on July 31 of each year.
(d)The fee for a health facility that is not a hospital, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 128700, shall be not more than 0.035 percent of the gross operating cost of the facility for the provision of health care services for its last fiscal year that ended on or before June 30 of the preceding calendar year.
(e)The fee for a hospital, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 128700, shall be not more than 0.035 percent of the gross operating cost of the facility for the provision of health care services for its last fiscal year that ended on or before June 30 of the preceding calendar year.
(f)(1)The fee for a freestanding ambulatory surgery clinic shall be established at an amount equal to the number of ambulatory surgery data records submitted to the office pursuant to Section 128737 for encounters in the preceding calendar year multiplied by not more than fifty cents ($0.50).
(2)(A)For the calendar year 2004 only, a freestanding ambulatory surgery clinic shall estimate the number of records it will file pursuant to Section 128737 for the calendar year 2004 and shall report that number to the office by March 12, 2004. The estimate shall be as accurate as possible. The fee in the calendar year 2004 shall be established initially at an amount equal to the estimated number of records reported multiplied by fifty cents ($0.50) and shall be due on July 1 and delinquent on July 31, 2004.
(B)The office shall compare the actual number of records filed by each freestanding clinic for the calendar year 2004 pursuant to Section 128737 with the estimated number of records reported pursuant to subparagraph (A). If the actual number reported is less than the estimated number reported, the office shall reduce the fee of the clinic for calendar year 2005 by the amount of the difference multiplied by fifty cents ($0.50). If the actual number reported exceeds the estimated number reported, the office shall increase the fee of the clinic for calendar year 2005 by the amount of the difference multiplied by fifty cents ($0.50) unless the actual number reported is greater than 120 percent of the estimated number reported, in which case the office shall increase the fee of the clinic for calendar year 2005 by the amount of the difference, up to and including 120 percent of the estimated number, multiplied by fifty cents ($0.50), and by the amount of the difference in excess of 120 percent of the estimated number multiplied by one dollar ($1).
(g)There is hereby established the California Health Data and Planning Fund within the office for the purpose of receiving and expending fee revenues collected pursuant to this chapter.
(h)Any amounts raised by the collection of the special fees provided for by subdivisions (d), (e), and (f) that are not required to meet appropriations in the Budget Act for the current fiscal year shall remain in the California Health Data and Planning Fund and shall be available to the office in succeeding years when appropriated by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act or another statute, for expenditure under the provisions of this chapter, Article 2 (commencing with Section 127340) of Chapter 2, and Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 128675) of Part 5, or for any other health-related programs administered by the office, and shall reduce the amount of the special fees that the office is authorized to establish and charge. In no event, however, shall those amounts be used for programs administered by the office pursuant to Sections 127676, 127679, 127681, 127683, and 127685, that become effective on or after January 1, 2019.
(i)(1)No health facility liable for the payment of fees required by this section shall be issued a license or have an existing license renewed unless the fees are paid. A new, previously unlicensed, health facility shall be charged a pro rata fee to be established by the office during the first year of operation.
(2)The license of any health facility, against which the fees required by this section are charged, shall be revoked, after notice and hearing, if it is determined by the office that the fees required were not paid within the time prescribed by subdivision (c).
(j)This section shall become operative on January 1, 2002.
SEC. 3.SEC. 4.Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 127675) is added to Part 2 of Division 107 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:9.Prescription Drug Pricing for Purchasers127675.(a)This chapter shall apply to a manufacturer of a prescription drug that is purchased or reimbursed by any of the following:
(1)A state purchaser in California, including, but not limited to, the Public Employees Retirement System, the State Department of Health Care Services, the Department of General Services, and the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, or an entity acting on behalf of a state purchaser.
(2)A licensed health care service plan.
(3)A health insurer holding a valid outstanding certificate of authority from the Insurance Commissioner.
(4)A pharmacy benefit manager as defined in subdivision (j) of Section 4430 of the Business and Professions Code.
(b)For the purposes of this chapter, the term office shall mean the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development.
127676.(a)The Legislature finds and declares that the State of California has a substantial public interest in the price and cost of prescription drugs. California is a major purchaser through the Public Employees Retirement System, the State Department of Health Care Services, the Department of General Services, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and other entities acting on behalf of a state purchaser. California also provides major tax expenditures through the tax exclusion of employer sponsored coverage and tax deductibility of coverage purchased by individuals, as well as tax deductibility of excess health care costs for individuals and families.
(b)(1)It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this chapter to provide notice and disclosure of information relating to the cost and pricing of prescription drugs in order to provide accountability to the state for prescription drug pricing.
(2)It is further the intent of the Legislature to permit a manufacturer of a prescription drug to voluntarily make pricing decisions regarding a prescription drug, including any price increases. It is further the intent of the Legislature to permit purchasers, both public and private, as well as pharmacy benefit managers, to negotiate discounts and rebates consistent with existing state and federal law.
127677.(a)A manufacturer of a prescription drug with a wholesale acquisition cost of more than forty dollars ($40) for a 30-day supply course of therapy shall notify each purchaser described in Section 127675 if the increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of a prescription drug is more than 10 16 percent, including the proposed increase and the cumulative increases that occurred within the previous two calendar years prior to the current year. For purposes of this section, a course of therapy is defined as either of the following:
(1)The recommended daily dosage units of a prescription drug pursuant to its prescribing label as approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration for 30 days.
(2)The recommended daily dosage units of a prescription drug pursuant to its prescribing label as approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration for a normal course of treatment that is less than 30 days.
(b)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall be provided in writing at least 60 days prior to the planned effective date of the increase.
(c)(1)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall include the date of the increase, the current wholesale acquisition cost of the prescription drug, and the dollar amount of the future increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of the prescription drug.
(2)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall include a statement regarding whether a change or improvement in the drug necessitates the price increase. If so, the manufacturer shall describe the change or improvement.
(d)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall be provided to each state purchaser and other purchasers described in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (a) of Section 127675 if a purchaser registers with the office for the purpose of this notification. The office shall make available to manufacturers a list of registered purchasers for the purpose of this notification.
(e)If a pharmacy benefit manager receives a notice of an increase in wholesale acquisition cost consistent with subdivision (a), it shall notify its large contracting public and private purchasers of the increase. For the purposes of this section, a large purchaser means a purchaser that provides coverage to more than 500 covered lives.
127679.(a)On a quarterly basis at a time prescribed by the office, office and in a format prescribed by the office, commencing no earlier than January 1, 2019, a manufacturer shall report to the office all of the following information for each drug for which an increase in wholesale acquisition cost is described in Section 127677:
(1)A description of the specific financial and nonfinancial factors used to make the decision to increase the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug and the amount of the increase, including, but not limited to, an explanation of how these factors explain the increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug.
(2)The previous years marketing budget for the drug, including the budget for patient assistance programs specific to the drug. (3)(2)A schedule of wholesale acquisition cost increases for the drug for the previous five years if the drug was manufactured by the company.
(4)(3)If the drug was acquired by the manufacturer within the previous five years, all of the following information:
(A)The wholesale acquisition cost of the drug at the time of acquisition and in the calendar year prior to acquisition.
(B)The name of the company from which the drug was acquired, the date acquired, and the purchase price.
(C)The year the drug was introduced to market and the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug at the time of introduction.
(5)(4)The patent expiration date of the drug if it is under patent.
(6)(5)If the drug is a multiple source drug, an innovator multiple source drug, a noninnovator multiple source drug, or a single source drug, as defined in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (7) of subdivision (k) of Section 1396r8 of Title 42 of the United States Code.
(7)(6)A description of the change or improvement in the drug, if any, that necessitates the price increase.
(8)(7)Volume of sales of the manufacturers drug in the United States for the previous year.
(b)The manufacturer may limit the information reported pursuant to subdivision (a) to that which is otherwise in the public domain or publicly available.
(c)The office shall publish the information provided to it pursuant to this section on its Internet Web site on no less than a quarterly basis. The information shall be published within the quarter in which it is received. 60 days of receipt from a manufacturer. The information shall be published in a manner that identifies the information that is disclosed on a per-drug basis and shall not be aggregated in a manner that would not allow identification of the drug.
(d)The office shall be responsible for the enforcement of this section.
(e)A manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this chapter that does not report the information required pursuant to this section is liable for a civil penalty of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per day for every day after the reporting period described in this section that the required information is not reported.
(f)A civil penalty shall be assessed and recovered in a civil action brought by the office in the name of the people of the State of California. Assessment of a civil penalty may, at the request of any manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this section, be reviewed on appeal, and the penalty may be reduced or waived for good cause.
(g)Any money received by the office pursuant to this section shall be paid into the Managed Care Fund.
127681.(a)A manufacturer of a prescription drug shall notify the office in writing if it is introducing a new prescription drug to market at a wholesale acquisition cost that exceeds the threshold set for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)). The notice shall be provided in writing within three days after the release of the drug in the commercial market. A manufacturer may make this notification pending approval by the federal Food and Drug Administration, if commercial availability is expected within three days of approval.
(b)No later than 30 days after notification pursuant to this section, a manufacturer shall report all of the following information to the office: office in a format prescribed by the office:
(1)A description of the marketing and pricing plans used in the launch of the new drug in the United States and internationally.
(2)The estimated volume of patients that may be prescribed the drug.
(3)If the drug was granted breakthrough therapy designation or priority review by the federal Food and Drug Administration prior to final approval.
(4)The expected marketing budget for the drug, including the budget for patient assistance programs. (5)(4)The date and price of acquisition if the drug was not developed by the manufacturer.
(c)The manufacturer may limit the information reported pursuant to subdivision (b) to that which is otherwise in the public domain or publicly available.
(d)The office shall publish the information provided to it pursuant to this section on its Internet Web site on no less than a monthly basis in the quarter in which it is received. quarterly basis. The information shall be published in a manner that identifies the information that is disclosed on a per-drug basis and shall not be aggregated in a manner that would not allow identification of the drug.
(e)The office shall be responsible for the enforcement of this section.
(f)A manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this chapter that does not report the information required pursuant to this section is liable for a civil penalty of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per day for every day after the notification period described in this section that the required information is not reported.
(g)A civil penalty shall be assessed and recovered in a civil action brought by the office in the name of the people of the State of California. Assessment of a civil penalty may, at the request of any manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this section, be reviewed on appeal, and the penalty may be reduced or waived for good cause.
(h)Any money received by the office pursuant to this section shall be paid into the Managed Care Fund.
127683.(a)A manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to the requirements of this chapter shall comply with this chapter. The office shall be responsible for the enforcement of these provisions.(b)(1)A manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this chapter that does not report the information required pursuant to this chapter to state purchasers, health care service plans, health insurers, or pharmacy benefit managers is liable for a civil penalty of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per day for every day after the applicable notification period that the required information is not reported.(2)A civil penalty shall be assessed and recovered in a civil action brought by the office in the name of the people of the State of California. Assessment of a civil penalty may, at the request of any manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this chapter, be reviewed on appeal, and the penalty may be reduced or waived for good cause.(c)Any money that is received by the office pursuant to this section shall be paid into the General Fund.127683.(a)Funding for the actual and necessary expenses of the office to conduct the activities described in this section and in Sections 127676, 127679, 127681, and 127685, shall be provided, subject to appropriation by the Legislature, from transfers of moneys from the Managed Care Fund and the Insurance Fund.
(b)The share of funding from the Managed Care Fund shall be based on the number of covered lives in the state that are covered under plans regulated by the Department of Managed Health Care, including covered lives under Medi-Cal managed care, as determined by the Department of Managed Health Care, in proportion to the total number of all covered lives in the state.
(c)The share of funding to be provided from the Insurance Fund shall be based on the number of covered lives in the state that are covered under health insurance policies and benefit plans regulated by the Department of Insurance, including covered lives under Medicare supplement plans, as determined by the Department of Insurance, in proportion to the total number of all covered lives in the state.
127685.(a)The office may adopt regulations or issue guidance for the implementation of this chapter. All information that is required to be reported to the office pursuant to this chapter shall be reported in a form prescribed by the office, commencing in the first calendar quarter of 2019.
(b)The office may consult with the Department of Managed Health Care, the Department of Insurance, the California State Board of Pharmacy, and any state purchaser of prescription drugs, or an entity acting on behalf of a state purchaser, in issuing guidance or adopting necessary regulations pursuant to subdivision (a), in posting information on its Internet Web site pursuant to this chapter, and in taking any other action for the purpose of implementing this chapter.
127686.(a)By January 1, 2022, the California Research Bureau shall report to the Legislature on the implementation of this chapter, including, but not limited to, this chapters effectiveness in addressing the following goals:
(1)Promoting transparency in pharmaceutical pricing for the state and other payers.
(2)Enhancing understanding about pharmaceutical spending trends.
(3)Assisting the state and other payers in management of pharmaceutical drug costs.
(b)A report submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.
(c)Notwithstanding any other law, implementation of this chapter shall be subject to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature. The review shall be performed as if this chapter were scheduled to be repealed on January 1, 2023.
(d)This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2024, and as of that date is repealed.
SEC. 4.SEC. 5.Section 10123.205 is added to the Insurance Code, to read:10123.205.(a)(1)A health insurer that reports rate information pursuant to Section 10181.3 or 10181.45 shall report the information described in paragraph (2) to the department no later than October 1 of each year, beginning October 1, 2018.
(2)For all covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be reported:
(A)The 25 most frequently prescribed drugs.
(B)The 25 most costly drugs by total annual plan spending.
(C)The 25 drugs with the highest year-over-year increase in total annual plan spending.
(b)The department shall compile the information reported pursuant to subdivision (a) into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. The data in the report shall be aggregated and shall not reveal information specific to individual health care service plans. insurers.
(c)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
(d)By January 1 of each year, beginning January 1, 2018, the department shall publish on its Internet Web site the report required pursuant to subdivision (b).
(e)After the report required in subdivision (b) is released, the department shall include the report as part of the public meeting required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 10181.45.
(f)Except for the report required pursuant to subdivision (b), the department shall keep confidential all of the information provided to the department pursuant to this section, and the information shall be protected from public disclosure.
SEC. 5.SEC. 6.Section 10181.45 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10181.45.(a)For large group health insurance policies, each health insurer shall file with the department the weighted average rate increase for all large group benefit designs during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following calendar year. The average shall be weighted by the number of insureds in each large group benefit design in the insurers large group market and adjusted to the most commonly sold large group benefit design by enrollment during the 12-month period. For the purposes of this section, the large group benefit design includes, but is not limited to, benefits such as basic health care services and prescription drugs. The large group benefit design shall not include cost sharing, including, but not limited to, deductibles, copays, and coinsurance.
(b)(1)A health insurer shall also submit any other information required pursuant to any regulation adopted by the department to comply with this article.
(2)The department shall conduct an annual public meeting regarding large group rates within four months of posting the aggregate information described in this section in order to permit a public discussion of the reasons for the changes in the rates, benefits, and cost sharing in the large group market. The meeting shall be held in either the Los Angeles area or the San Francisco Bay area.
(c)A health insurer subject to subdivision (a) shall also disclose the following for the aggregate rate information for the large group market submitted under this section:
(1)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, number and percentage of rate changes reviewed by the following:
(A)Plan year.
(B)Segment type, including whether the rate is community rated, in whole or in part.
(C)Product type.
(D)Number of insureds.
(E)The number of products sold that have materially different benefits, cost sharing, or other elements of benefit design.
(2)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, any factors affecting the base rate, and the actuarial basis for those factors, including all of the following:
(A)Geographic region.
(B)Age, including age rating factors.
(C)Occupation.
(D)Industry.
(E)Health status factors, including, but not limited to, experience and utilization.
(F)Employee, and employee and dependents, including a description of the family composition used.
(G)Insureds share of premiums.
(H)Insureds cost sharing, including cost sharing for prescription drugs.
(I)Covered benefits in addition to basic health care services, as defined in Section 1345 of the Health and Safety Code, and other benefits mandated under this article.
(J)Which market segment, if any, is fully experience rated and which market segment, if any, is in part experience rated and in part community rated.
(K)Any other factor that affects the rate that is not otherwise specified.
(3)(A)The insurers overall annual medical trend factor assumptions for all benefits and by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology for the applicable 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year. A health insurer that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the health insurers insureds shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories, to the maximum extent possible, that are the same or similar to those used by other insurers.
(B)The amount of the projected trend separately attributable to the use of services, price inflation, and fees and risk for annual policy trends by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology. A health insurer that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the insureds shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories that are, to the maximum extent possible, the same or similar to those used by other insurers.
(C)A comparison of the aggregate per insured per month costs and rate of changes over the last five years for each of the following:
(i)Premiums.
(ii)Claims costs, if any.
(iii)Administrative expenses.
(iv)Taxes and fees.
(D)Any changes in insured cost sharing over the prior year associated with the submitted rate information, including both of the following:
(i)Actual copays, coinsurance, deductibles, annual out of pocket maximums, and any other cost sharing by the benefit categories determined by the department.
(ii)Any aggregate changes in insured cost sharing over the prior years as measured by the weighted average actuarial value, weighted by the number of insureds.
(E)Any changes in insured benefits over the prior year, including a description of benefits added or eliminated as well as any aggregate changes as measured as a percentage of the aggregate claims costs, listed by the categories determined by the department.
(F)Any cost containment and quality improvement efforts made since the insurers prior years information pursuant to this section for the same category of health insurer. To the extent possible, the insurer shall describe any significant new health care cost containment and quality improvement efforts and provide an estimate of potential savings together with an estimated cost or savings for the projection period.
(G)The number of products covered by the information that incurred the excise tax paid by the health insurer.
(4)(A)For covered prescription generic drugs excluding specialty generic drugs, prescription brand name drugs excluding specialty drugs, and prescription brand name and generic specialty drugs dispensed at a pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be disclosed:
(i)The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drug costs for the prior year for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(ii)The year-over-year increase, as a percentage, in per-member, per-month total health insurer spending for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(iii)The year-over-year increase in per-member, per-month costs for drug prices compared to other components of the health care premium.
(iv)The specialty tier formulary list.
(B)The insurer shall include the percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drugs administered in a doctors office that are covered under the medical benefit as separate from the pharmacy benefit, if available.
(C)(i)The insurer shall include information on its use of a pharmacy benefit manager, if any, including which components of the prescription drug coverage described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) are managed by the pharmacy benefit manager.
(ii)The insurer shall also include the name or names of the pharmacy benefit manager, or managers if the insurer uses more than one.
(d)The information required pursuant to this section shall be submitted to the department on or before October 1, 2016, and on or before October 1 annually thereafter. Information submitted pursuant to this section is subject to Section 10181.7.
(e)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
SEC. 6.SEC. 7.The provisions of this act are severable. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 7.SEC. 8.The Legislature finds and declares that Sections 1 and 4 5 of this act, which add Section 1367.243 to the Health and Safety Code and Section 10123.205 to the Insurance Code, respectively, impose a limitation on the publics right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies within the meaning of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution. Pursuant to that constitutional provision, the Legislature makes the following findings to demonstrate the interest protected by this limitation and the need for protecting that interest:
In order to protect proprietary, confidential information regarding health care service plan and health insurer prescription drug utilization and spending information that is specific to the plan or insurer and to protect the integrity of the competitive market, it is necessary that this act limit the publics right of access to that information.
SEC. 8.SEC. 9.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
(a)(1)A health care service plan that reports rate information pursuant to Section 1385.03 or 1385.045 shall report the information described in paragraph (2) to the department no later than October 1 of each year, beginning October 1, 2018.
(2)For all covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be reported:
(A)The 25 most frequently prescribed drugs.
(B)The 25 most costly drugs by total annual plan spending.
(C)The 25 drugs with the highest year-over-year increase in total annual plan spending.
(b)The department shall compile the information reported pursuant to subdivision (a) into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. The data in the report shall be aggregated and shall not reveal information specific to individual health care service plans.
(c)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
(d)By January 1 of each year, beginning January 1, 2019, the department shall publish on its Internet Web site the report required pursuant to subdivision (b).
(e)After the report required in subdivision (b) is released, the department shall include the report as part of the public meeting required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 1385.045.
(f)Except for the report required pursuant to subdivision (b), the department shall keep confidential all of the information provided to the department pursuant to this section, and the information shall be protected from public disclosure.
SEC. 2.Section 1385.045 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1385.045.(a)For large group health care service plan contracts, each health plan shall file with the department the weighted average rate increase for all large group benefit designs during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following calendar year. The average shall be weighted by the number of enrollees in each large group benefit design in the plans large group market and adjusted to the most commonly sold large group benefit design by enrollment during the 12-month period. For the purposes of this section, the large group benefit design includes, but is not limited to, benefits such as basic health care services and prescription drugs. The large group benefit design shall not include cost sharing, including, but not limited to, deductibles, copays, and coinsurance.
(b)(1)A plan shall also submit any other information required pursuant to any regulation adopted by the department to comply with this article.
(2)The department shall conduct an annual public meeting regarding large group rates within three four months of posting the aggregate information described in this section in order to permit a public discussion of the reasons for the changes in the rates, benefits, and cost sharing in the large group market. The meeting shall be held in either the Los Angeles area or the San Francisco Bay area.
(c)A health care service plan subject to subdivision (a) shall also disclose the following for the aggregate rate information for the large group market submitted under this section:
(1)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, number and percentage of rate changes reviewed by the following:
(A)Plan year.
(B)Segment type, including whether the rate is community rated, in whole or in part.
(C)Product type.
(D)Number of enrollees.
(E)The number of products sold that have materially different benefits, cost sharing, or other elements of benefit design.
(2)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, any factors affecting the base rate, and the actuarial basis for those factors, including all of the following:
(A)Geographic region.
(B)Age, including age rating factors.
(C)Occupation.
(D)Industry.
(E)Health status factors, including, but not limited to, experience and utilization.
(F)Employee, and employee and dependents, including a description of the family composition used.
(G)Enrollees share of premiums.
(H)Enrollees cost sharing, including cost sharing for prescription drugs.
(I)Covered benefits in addition to basic health care services, as defined in Section 1345, and other benefits mandated under this article.
(J)Which market segment, if any, is fully experience rated and which market segment, if any, is in part experience rated and in part community rated.
(K)Any other factor that affects the rate that is not otherwise specified.
(3)(A)The plans overall annual medical trend factor assumptions for all benefits and by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology for the applicable 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year. A health plan that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the enrollees of the plan shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories, to the maximum extent possible, that are the same as, or similar to, those used by other plans.
(B)The amount of the projected trend separately attributable to the use of services, price inflation, and fees and risk for annual plan contract trends by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology. A health plan that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the enrollees of the plan shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories that are, to the maximum extent possible, the same or similar to those used by other plans.
(C)A comparison of the aggregate per enrollee per month costs and rate of changes over the last five years for each of the following:
(i)Premiums.
(ii)Claims costs, if any.
(iii)Administrative expenses.
(iv)Taxes and fees.
(D)Any changes in enrollee cost sharing over the prior year associated with the submitted rate information, including both of the following:
(i)Actual copays, coinsurance, deductibles, annual out of pocket maximums, and any other cost sharing by the benefit categories determined by the department.
(ii)Any aggregate changes in enrollee cost sharing over the prior years as measured by the weighted average actuarial value, weighted by the number of enrollees.
(E)Any changes in enrollee benefits over the prior year, including a description of benefits added or eliminated, as well as any aggregate changes, as measured as a percentage of the aggregate claims costs, listed by the categories determined by the department.
(F)Any cost containment and quality improvement efforts since the plans prior years information pursuant to this section for the same category of health benefit plan. To the extent possible, the plan shall describe any significant new health care cost containment and quality improvement efforts and provide an estimate of potential savings together with an estimated cost or savings for the projection period.
(G)The number of products covered by the information that incurred the excise tax paid by the health plan.
(4)(A)For covered prescription generic drugs excluding specialty generic drugs, prescription brand name drugs excluding specialty drugs, and prescription brand name and generic specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be disclosed:
(i)The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drug costs for the prior year for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(ii)The year-over-year increase, as a percentage, in per-member, per-month total health plan spending for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(iii)The year-over-year increase in per-member, per-month costs for drug prices compared to other components of the health care premium.
(iv)The specialty tier formulary list.
(B)The plan shall include the percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drugs administered in a doctors office that are covered under the medical benefit as separate from the pharmacy benefit, if available.
(C)(i)The plan shall include information on its use of a pharmacy benefit manager, if any, including which components of the prescription drug coverage described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) are managed by the pharmacy benefit manager.
(ii)The plan shall also include the name or names of the pharmacy benefit manager, or managers if the plan uses more than one.
(d)The information required pursuant to this section shall be submitted to the department on or before October 1, 2018, and on or before October 1 annually thereafter. Information submitted pursuant to this section is subject to Section 1385.07.
(e)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
SEC. 3.Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 127675) is added to Part 2 of Division 107 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:9.Prescription Drug Pricing for Purchasers127675.(a)This chapter shall apply to a manufacturer of a prescription drug that is purchased or reimbursed by any of the following:
(1)A state purchaser in California, including, but not limited to, the Public Employees Retirement System, the State Department of Health Care Services, the Department of General Services, and the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, or an entity acting on behalf of a state purchaser.
(2)A licensed health care service plan.
(3)A health insurer holding a valid outstanding certificate of authority from the Insurance Commissioner.
(4)A pharmacy benefit manager as defined in subdivision (j) of Section 4430 of the Business and Professions Code.
(b)For the purposes of this chapter, the term office shall mean the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development.
127676.(a)The Legislature finds and declares that the State of California has a substantial public interest in the price and cost of prescription drugs. California is a major purchaser through the Public Employees Retirement System, the State Department of Health Care Services, the Department of General Services, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and other entities acting on behalf of a state purchaser. California also provides major tax expenditures through the tax exclusion of employer sponsored coverage and tax deductibility of coverage purchased by individuals, as well as tax deductibility of excess health care costs for individuals and families.
(b)(1)It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this chapter to provide notice and disclosure of information relating to the cost and pricing of prescription drugs in order to provide accountability to the state for prescription drug pricing.
(2)It is further the intent of the Legislature to permit a manufacturer of a prescription drug to voluntarily make pricing decisions regarding a prescription drug, including any price increases. It is further the intent of the Legislature to permit purchasers, both public and private, as well as pharmacy benefit managers, to negotiate discounts and rebates consistent with existing state and federal law.
127677.(a)A manufacturer of a prescription drug with a wholesale acquisition cost of more than forty dollars ($40) shall notify each purchaser described in Section 127675 that it is increasing the wholesale acquisition cost of a prescription drug if the cumulative increase is more than 10 percent over the two calendar years prior to the current year. for a 30-day supply shall notify each purchaser described in Section 127675 if the increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of a prescription drug is more than 10 percent, including the proposed increase and the cumulative increases that occurred within the previous two calendar years prior to the current year.
(b)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall be provided in writing at least 60 days prior to the planned effective date of the increase.
(c)(1)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall include the date of the increase, the current wholesale acquisition cost of the prescription drug, and the dollar amount of the future increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of the prescription drug.
(2)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall include a statement of any changes or improvements to the clinical efficacy of the drug that explain the increase in wholesale acquisition cost. The manufacturer shall state if there are no changes or improvements made to the clinical efficacy of the drug subject to the notice. regarding whether a change or improvement in the drug necessitates the price increase. If so, the manufacturer shall describe the change or improvement.
(d)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall be provided to each state purchaser and other purchasers described in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (a) of Section 127675 that register if a purchaser registers with the office for the purpose of this notification. The office shall make available to manufacturers a list of registered purchasers for the purpose of this notification.
(e)If a pharmacy benefit manager receives a notice of an increase in wholesale acquisition cost consistent with subdivision (a), it shall notify its large contracting public and private purchasers of the increase. For the purposes of this section, a large purchaser means a purchaser that provides coverage to more than 500 covered lives.
127679.(a)At the time that the increase in wholesale acquisition cost described in subdivision (a) of Section 127677 takes effect, a manufacturer shall report all of the following information to the office:127679.(a)On a quarterly basis at a time prescribed by the office, a manufacturer shall report to the office all of the following information for each drug for which an increase in wholesale acquisition cost is described in Section 127677:
(1)A description of the specific financial and nonfinancial factors used to make the decision to increase the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug and the amount of the increase, including, but not limited to, an explanation of how these factors explain the increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug. The manufacturer may limit these factors to information that is otherwise in the public domain or publicly available.
(2)The previous years marketing budget for the drug, including the budget for patient assistance programs specific to the drug.
(3)A schedule of wholesale acquisition cost increases for the drug for the previous five years if the drug was manufactured by the company.
(4)If the drug was acquired by the manufacturer within the previous five years, all of the following information:
(A)The wholesale acquisition cost of the drug at the time of acquisition and in the calendar year prior to acquisition.
(B)The name of the company from which the drug was acquired, the date acquired, and the purchase price.
(C)The year the drug was introduced to market and the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug at the time of introduction.
(5)The patent expiration date of the drug if it is under patent.
(6)If the drug is a multiple source drug, an innovator multiple source drug, a noninnovator multiple source drug, or a single source drug, as defined in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (7) of subdivision (k) of Section 1396r8 of Title 42 of the United States Code.
(7)Documentation of increased clinical efficacy of the drug, if any. The manufacturer shall state if the drug subject to the notice does not exceed the clinical efficacy of existing treatments in the same therapeutic class or if it is an entirely different therapeutic class.(7)A description of the change or improvement in the drug, if any, that necessitates the price increase.
(8)Volume of sales of the manufacturers drug in the United States for the previous year.
(b)The manufacturer may limit the information reported pursuant to subdivision (a) to that which is otherwise in the public domain or publicly available.
(b)(c)The office shall publish the information provided to it pursuant to this section on its Internet Web site on no less than a quarterly basis. The information shall be published within the quarter in which it is received. The information shall be published in a manner that identifies the information that is disclosed on a per-drug basis and shall not be aggregated in a manner that would not allow identification of the drug.
127681.(a)A manufacturer of a prescription drug shall notify the office in writing if it is introducing a new prescription drug to market at a wholesale acquisition cost that exceeds the threshold set for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)). The notice shall be provided in writing within three days after approval by the federal Food and Drug Administration. the release of the drug in the commercial market. A manufacturer may make this notification pending approval by the federal Food and Drug Administration, if commercial availability is expected within three days of approval.
(b)No later than 30 days after notification pursuant to this section, a manufacturer shall report all of the following information to the office:
(1)A description of the marketing and pricing plans used in the launch of the new drug in the United States and internationally. The manufacturer may limit these factors to information that is otherwise in the public domain or publicly available.
(2)The estimated volume of patients that may be prescribed the drug.
(3)Any documentation showing increased efficacy of the drug compared to existing treatments. The manufacturer shall state if there are no changes or improvements made to the clinical efficacy of the drug subject to the notice. (4)(3)If the drug was granted breakthrough therapy designation or priority review by the federal Food and Drug Administration prior to final approval.
(5)(4)The expected marketing budget for the drug, including the budget for patient assistance programs.
(6)(5)The date and price of acquisition if the drug was not developed by the manufacturer.
(c)The manufacturer may limit the information reported pursuant to subdivision (b) to that which is otherwise in the public domain or publicly available.
(c)(d)The office shall publish the information provided to it pursuant to this section on its Internet Web site on no less than a monthly basis. basis in the quarter in which it is received. The information shall be published in a manner that identifies the information that is disclosed on a per-drug basis and shall not be aggregated in a manner that would not allow identification of the drug.
127683.(a)A manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to the requirements of this chapter shall comply with this chapter. The office shall be responsible for the enforcement of these provisions.
(b)(1)A manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this chapter that does not report the information required pursuant to this chapter to state purchasers, health care service plans, health insurers, or pharmacy benefit managers is liable for a civil penalty of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per day for every day after the applicable notification period that the required information is not reported.
(2)A civil penalty shall be assessed and recovered in a civil action brought by the office in the name of the people of the State of California. Assessment of a civil penalty may, at the request of any manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this chapter, be reviewed on appeal, and the penalty may be reduced or waived for good cause.
(c)Any money that is received by the office pursuant to this section shall be paid into the General Fund.
127685.(a)The office may adopt regulations or issue guidance for the implementation of this chapter.
(b)The office may consult with the Department of Managed Health Care, the Department of Insurance, the California State Board of Pharmacy, and any state purchaser of prescription drugs, or an entity acting on behalf of a state purchaser, in issuing guidance or adopting necessary regulations pursuant to subdivision (a), in posting information on its Internet Web site pursuant to this chapter, and in taking any other action for the purpose of implementing this chapter.
SEC. 4.Section 10123.205 is added to the Insurance Code, to read:10123.205.(a)(1)A health insurer that reports rate information pursuant to Section 10181.3 or 10181.45 shall report the information described in paragraph (2) to the department no later than October 1 of each year, beginning October 1, 2018.
(2)For all covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be reported:
(A)The 25 most frequently prescribed drugs.
(B)The 25 most costly drugs by total annual plan spending.
(C)The 25 drugs with the highest year-over-year increase in total annual plan spending.
(b)The department shall compile the information reported pursuant to subdivision (a) into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. The data in the report shall be aggregated and shall not reveal information specific to individual health care service plans.
(c)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
(d)By January 1 of each year, beginning January 1, 2018, the department shall publish on its Internet Web site the report required pursuant to subdivision (b).
(e)After the report required in subdivision (b) is released, the department shall include the report as part of the public meeting required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 10181.45.
(f)Except for the report required pursuant to subdivision (b), the department shall keep confidential all of the information provided to the department pursuant to this section, and the information shall be protected from public disclosure.
SEC. 5.Section 10181.45 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10181.45.(a)For large group health insurance policies, each health insurer shall file with the department the weighted average rate increase for all large group benefit designs during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following calendar year. The average shall be weighted by the number of insureds in each large group benefit design in the insurers large group market and adjusted to the most commonly sold large group benefit design by enrollment during the 12-month period. For the purposes of this section, the large group benefit design includes, but is not limited to, benefits such as basic health care services and prescription drugs. The large group benefit design shall not include cost sharing, including, but not limited to, deductibles, copays, and coinsurance.
(b)(1)A health insurer shall also submit any other information required pursuant to any regulation adopted by the department to comply with this article.
(2)The department shall conduct an annual public meeting regarding large group rates within three four months of posting the aggregate information described in this section in order to permit a public discussion of the reasons for the changes in the rates, benefits, and cost sharing in the large group market. The meeting shall be held in either the Los Angeles area or the San Francisco Bay area.
(c)A health insurer subject to subdivision (a) shall also disclose the following for the aggregate rate information for the large group market submitted under this section:
(1)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, number and percentage of rate changes reviewed by the following:
(A)Plan year.
(B)Segment type, including whether the rate is community rated, in whole or in part.
(C)Product type.
(D)Number of insureds.
(E)The number of products sold that have materially different benefits, cost sharing, or other elements of benefit design.
(2)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, any factors affecting the base rate, and the actuarial basis for those factors, including all of the following:
(A)Geographic region.
(B)Age, including age rating factors.
(C)Occupation.
(D)Industry.
(E)Health status factors, including, but not limited to, experience and utilization.
(F)Employee, and employee and dependents, including a description of the family composition used.
(G)Insureds share of premiums.
(H)Insureds cost sharing, including cost sharing for prescription drugs.
(I)Covered benefits in addition to basic health care services, as defined in Section 1345 of the Health and Safety Code, and other benefits mandated under this article.
(J)Which market segment, if any, is fully experience rated and which market segment, if any, is in part experience rated and in part community rated.
(K)Any other factor that affects the rate that is not otherwise specified.
(3)(A)The insurers overall annual medical trend factor assumptions for all benefits and by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology for the applicable 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year. A health insurer that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the health insurers insureds shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories, to the maximum extent possible, that are the same or similar to those used by other insurers.
(B)The amount of the projected trend separately attributable to the use of services, price inflation, and fees and risk for annual policy trends by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology. A health insurer that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the insureds shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories that are, to the maximum extent possible, the same or similar to those used by other insurers.
(C)A comparison of the aggregate per insured per month costs and rate of changes over the last five years for each of the following:
(i)Premiums.
(ii)Claims costs, if any.
(iii)Administrative expenses.
(iv)Taxes and fees.
(D)Any changes in insured cost sharing over the prior year associated with the submitted rate information, including both of the following:
(i)Actual copays, coinsurance, deductibles, annual out of pocket maximums, and any other cost sharing by the benefit categories determined by the department.
(ii)Any aggregate changes in insured cost sharing over the prior years as measured by the weighted average actuarial value, weighted by the number of insureds.
(E)Any changes in insured benefits over the prior year, including a description of benefits added or eliminated as well as any aggregate changes as measured as a percentage of the aggregate claims costs, listed by the categories determined by the department.
(F)Any cost containment and quality improvement efforts made since the insurers prior years information pursuant to this section for the same category of health insurer. To the extent possible, the insurer shall describe any significant new health care cost containment and quality improvement efforts and provide an estimate of potential savings together with an estimated cost or savings for the projection period.
(G)The number of products covered by the information that incurred the excise tax paid by the health insurer.
(4)(A)For covered prescription generic drugs excluding specialty generic drugs, prescription brand name drugs excluding specialty drugs, and prescription brand name and generic specialty drugs dispensed at a pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be disclosed:
(i)The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drug costs for the prior year for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(ii)The year-over-year increase, as a percentage, in per-member, per-month total health insurer spending for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(iii)The year-over-year increase in per-member, per-month costs for drug prices compared to other components of the health care premium.
(iv)The specialty tier formulary list.
(B)The insurer shall include the percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drugs administered in a doctors office that are covered under the medical benefit as separate from the pharmacy benefit, if available.
(C)(i)The insurer shall include information on its use of a pharmacy benefit manager, if any, including which components of the prescription drug coverage described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) are managed by the pharmacy benefit manager.
(ii)The insurer shall also include the name or names of the pharmacy benefit manager, or managers if the insurer uses more than one.
(d)The information required pursuant to this section shall be submitted to the department on or before October 1, 2016, and on or before October 1 annually thereafter. Information submitted pursuant to this section is subject to Section 10181.7.
(e)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
SEC. 6.The provisions of this act are severable. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 6.SEC. 7.The Legislature finds and declares that Sections 1 and 4 of this act, which add Section 1367.243 to the Health and Safety Code and Section 10123.205 to the Insurance Code, respectively, impose a limitation on the publics right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies within the meaning of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution. Pursuant to that constitutional provision, the Legislature makes the following findings to demonstrate the interest protected by this limitation and the need for protecting that interest:
In order to protect proprietary, confidential information regarding health care service plan and health insurer prescription drug utilization and spending information that is specific to the plan or insurer and to protect the integrity of the competitive market, it is necessary that this act limit the publics right of access to that information.
SEC. 7.SEC. 8.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
(a)(1)A health care service plan that reports rate information pursuant to Section 1385.03 or 1385.045 shall report the information described in paragraph (2) to the department no later than October 1 of each year, beginning October 1, 2018.
(2)For all covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be reported:
(A)The 25 most frequently prescribed drugs.
(B)The 25 most costly drugs by total annual plan spending.
(C)The 25 drugs with the highest year-over-year increase in total annual plan spending.
(b)The department shall compile the information reported pursuant to subdivision (a) into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. The data in the report shall be aggregated and shall not reveal information specific to individual health care service plans.
(c)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
(d)By January 1 of each year, beginning January 1, 2019, the department shall publish on its Internet Web site the report required pursuant to subdivision (b).
(e)After the report required in subdivision (b) is released, the department shall include the report as part of the public meeting required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 1385.045.
(f)Except for the report required pursuant to subdivision (b), the department shall keep confidential all of the information provided to the department pursuant to this section, and the information shall be protected from public disclosure.
SEC. 2.Section 1385.045 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1385.045.(a)For large group health care service plan contracts, each health plan shall file with the department the weighted average rate increase for all large group benefit designs during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following calendar year. The average shall be weighted by the number of enrollees in each large group benefit design in the plans large group market and adjusted to the most commonly sold large group benefit design by enrollment during the 12-month period. For the purposes of this section, the large group benefit design includes, but is not limited to, benefits such as basic health care services and prescription drugs. The large group benefit design shall not include cost sharing, including, but not limited to, deductibles, copays, and coinsurance.
(b)(1)A plan shall also submit any other information required pursuant to any regulation adopted by the department to comply with this article.
(2)The department shall conduct an annual public meeting regarding large group rates within three months of posting the aggregate information described in this section in order to permit a public discussion of the reasons for the changes in the rates, benefits, and cost sharing in the large group market. The meeting shall be held in either the Los Angeles area or the San Francisco Bay area.
(c)A health care service plan subject to subdivision (a) shall also disclose the following for the aggregate rate information for the large group market submitted under this section:
(1)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, number and percentage of rate changes reviewed by the following:
(A)Plan year.
(B)Segment type, including whether the rate is community rated, in whole or in part.
(C)Product type.
(D)Number of enrollees.
(E)The number of products sold that have materially different benefits, cost sharing, or other elements of benefit design.
(2)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, any factors affecting the base rate, and the actuarial basis for those factors, including all of the following:
(A)Geographic region.
(B)Age, including age rating factors.
(C)Occupation.
(D)Industry.
(E)Health status factors, including, but not limited to, experience and utilization.
(F)Employee, and employee and dependents, including a description of the family composition used.
(G)Enrollees share of premiums.
(H)Enrollees cost sharing, including cost sharing for prescription drugs.
(I)Covered benefits in addition to basic health care services, as defined in Section 1345, and other benefits mandated under this article.
(J)Which market segment, if any, is fully experience rated and which market segment, if any, is in part experience rated and in part community rated.
(K)Any other factor that affects the rate that is not otherwise specified.
(3)(A)The plans overall annual medical trend factor assumptions for all benefits and by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology for the applicable 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year. A health plan that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the enrollees of the plan shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories, to the maximum extent possible, that are the same as, or similar to, those used by other plans.
(B)The amount of the projected trend separately attributable to the use of services, price inflation, and fees and risk for annual plan contract trends by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology. A health plan that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the enrollees of the plan shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories that are, to the maximum extent possible, the same or similar to those used by other plans.
(C)A comparison of the aggregate per enrollee per month costs and rate of changes over the last five years for each of the following:
(i)Premiums.
(ii)Claims costs, if any.
(iii)Administrative expenses.
(iv)Taxes and fees.
(D)Any changes in enrollee cost sharing over the prior year associated with the submitted rate information, including both of the following:
(i)Actual copays, coinsurance, deductibles, annual out of pocket maximums, and any other cost sharing by the benefit categories determined by the department.
(ii)Any aggregate changes in enrollee cost sharing over the prior years as measured by the weighted average actuarial value, weighted by the number of enrollees.
(E)Any changes in enrollee benefits over the prior year, including a description of benefits added or eliminated, as well as any aggregate changes, as measured as a percentage of the aggregate claims costs, listed by the categories determined by the department.
(F)Any cost containment and quality improvement efforts since the plans prior years information pursuant to this section for the same category of health benefit plan. To the extent possible, the plan shall describe any significant new health care cost containment and quality improvement efforts and provide an estimate of potential savings together with an estimated cost or savings for the projection period.
(G)The number of products covered by the information that incurred the excise tax paid by the health plan.
(4)(A)For covered prescription generic drugs excluding specialty generic drugs, prescription brand name drugs excluding specialty drugs, and prescription brand name and generic specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be disclosed:
(i)The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drug costs for the prior year for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(ii)The year-over-year increase, as a percentage, in total spending for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(iii)The year-over-year increase in per-member, per-month costs for drug prices compared to other components of the health care premium.
(iv)The specialty tier formulary list.
(B)The plan shall include the percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drugs administered in a doctors office that are covered under the medical benefit as separate from the pharmacy benefit, if available.
(C)(i)The plan shall include information on its use of a pharmacy benefit manager, if any, including which components of the prescription drug coverage described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) are managed by the pharmacy benefit manager.
(ii)The plan shall also include the name or names of the pharmacy benefit manager, or managers if the plan uses more than one.
(d)The information required pursuant to this section shall be submitted to the department on or before October 1, 2018, and on or before October 1 annually thereafter. Information submitted pursuant to this section is subject to Section 1385.07.
(e)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
SEC. 3.Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 127675) is added to Part 2 of Division 107 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:9.Prescription Drug Pricing for Purchasers127675.(a)This chapter shall apply to a manufacturer of a prescription drug that is purchased or reimbursed by any of the following:
(1)A state purchaser in California, including, but not limited to, the Public Employees Retirement System, the State Department of Health Care Services, the Department of General Services, and the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, or an entity acting on behalf of a state purchaser.
(2)A licensed health care service plan.
(3)A health insurer holding a valid outstanding certificate of authority from the Insurance Commissioner.
(4)A pharmacy benefit manager as defined in subdivision (j) of Section 4430 of the Business and Professions Code.
(b)For the purposes of this chapter, the term office shall mean the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development.
127676.(a)The Legislature finds and declares that the State of California has a substantial public interest in the price and cost of prescription drugs. California is a major purchaser through the Public Employees Retirement System, the State Department of Health Care Services, the Department of General Services, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and other entities acting on behalf of a state purchaser. California also provides major tax expenditures through the tax exclusion of employer sponsored coverage and tax deductibility of coverage purchased by individuals, as well as tax deductibility of excess health care costs for individuals and families.
(b)(1)It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this chapter to provide notice and disclosure of information relating to the cost and pricing of prescription drugs in order to provide accountability to the state for prescription drug pricing.
(2)It is further the intent of the Legislature to permit a manufacturer of a prescription drug to voluntarily make pricing decisions regarding a prescription drug, including any price increases. It is further the intent of the Legislature to permit purchasers, both public and private, as well as pharmacy benefit managers, to negotiate discounts and rebates consistent with existing state and federal law.
127677.(a)A manufacturer of a prescription drug with a wholesale acquisition cost of more than forty dollars ($40) shall notify each purchaser described in Section 127675 that it is increasing the wholesale acquisition cost of a prescription drug if any of the following circumstances apply: the cumulative increase is more than 10 percent over the two calendar years prior to the current year.
(1)The wholesale acquisition cost for the prescription drug is under the threshold set for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)) and if the cumulative increase is more than 25 percent over the three calendar years prior to the current year.(2)The wholesale acquisition cost for the prescription drug is over the threshold set for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)), and if the cumulative increase is more than 10 percent over the three calendar years prior to the current year.(b)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall be provided in writing at least 90 60 days prior to the planned effective date of the increase.
(c)(1)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall include the date of the increase, the current wholesale acquisition cost of the prescription drug, and the dollar amount of the future increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of the prescription drug.
(c)(2)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall include a statement of any changes or improvements to the clinical efficacy of the drug that explain the increase in wholesale acquisition cost. The manufacturer shall state if there are no changes or improvements made to the clinical efficacy of the drug subject to the notice.
(d)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall not be required for a prescription drug that is not already purchased or reimbursed by a purchaser described in subdivision (a), except for prescription drugs described in Section 127681. be provided to each state purchaser and other purchasers described in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (a) of Section 127675 that register with the office for the purpose of this notification.
(e)If a pharmacy benefit manager receives a notice of an increase in wholesale acquisition cost consistent with subdivision (a), it shall notify its large contracting public and private purchasers of the increase. For the purposes of this section, a large purchaser means a purchaser that provides coverage to more than 500 covered lives.
127679.(a)At the time that the increase in wholesale acquisition cost described in subdivision (a) of Section 127677 takes effect, a manufacturer shall report all of the following information to the office:
(1)A description of the specific financial and nonfinancial factors used to make the decision to increase the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug and the amount of the increase, including, but not limited to, an explanation of how these factors justify explain the increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug. The manufacturer may limit these factors to information that is otherwise in the public domain or publicly available.
(2)The previous years marketing budget for the drug, including the budget for patient assistance programs specific to the drug.
(3)A schedule of wholesale acquisition cost increases for the drug for the previous five years if the drug was manufactured by the company.
(4)If the drug was acquired by the manufacturer within the previous five years, all of the following information:
(A)The wholesale acquisition cost of the drug at the time of acquisition and in the calendar year prior to acquisition.
(B)The name of the company from which the drug was acquired, the date acquired, and the purchase price.
(C)The year the drug was introduced to market and the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug at the time of introduction.
(5)The patent expiration date of the drug if it is under patent.
(6)If the drug is a multiple source drug, an innovator multiple source drug, a noninnovator multiple source drug, or a single source drug, as defined in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (7) of subdivision (k) of Section 1396r8 of Title 42 of the United States Code.
(7)Documentation of increased clinical efficacy of the drug, if any. The manufacturer shall state if the drug subject to the notice does not exceed the clinical efficacy of existing treatments. treatments in the same therapeutic class or if it is an entirely different therapeutic class.
(8)Volume of sales of the drug in the United States for the previous year.
(b)The office shall publish the information provided to it pursuant to this section on its Internet Web site on no less than a quarterly basis. The information shall be published within the quarter in which it is received. The information shall be published in a manner that identifies the information that is disclosed on a per-drug basis and shall not be aggregated in a manner that would not allow identification of the drug.
127681.(a)A manufacturer of a prescription drug shall notify the office in writing if it is introducing a new prescription drug to market at a wholesale acquisition cost that exceeds the threshold set for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)). The notice shall be provided in writing within three days after approval by the federal Food and Drug Administration. A manufacturer may make this notification pending approval by the federal Food and Drug Administration, if commercial availability is expected within three days of approval.
(b)No later than 30 days after notification pursuant to this section, a manufacturer shall report all of the following information to the office:
(1)A description of the marketing and pricing plans used in the launch of the new drug in the United States and internationally. The manufacturer may limit these factors to information that is otherwise in the public domain or publicly available.
(2)The estimated volume of patients that may be prescribed the drug.
(3)Any documentation showing increased efficacy of the drug compared to existing treatments. The manufacturer shall state if there are no changes or improvements made to the clinical efficacy of the drug subject to the notice.
(4)If the drug was granted breakthrough therapy designation or priority review by the federal Food and Drug Administration prior to final approval.
(5)The expected marketing budget for the drug, including the budget for patient assistance programs.
(6)The date and price of acquisition if the drug was not developed by the manufacturer.
(c)The office shall publish the information provided to it pursuant to this section on its Internet Web site on no less than a monthly basis. The information shall be published in a manner that identifies the information that is disclosed on a per-drug basis and shall not be aggregated in a manner that would not allow identification of the drug.
127683.(a)A manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to the requirements of this chapter shall comply with this chapter. The office shall be responsible for the enforcement of these provisions.
(b)(1)A manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this chapter that does not report the information required pursuant to this chapter to state purchasers, health care service plans, health insurers, or pharmacy benefit managers is liable for a civil penalty of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per day for every day after the applicable notification period that the required information is not reported.
(2)A civil penalty shall be assessed and recovered in a civil action brought by the office in the name of the people of the State of California. Assessment of a civil penalty may, at the request of any manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this chapter, be reviewed on appeal, and the penalty may be reduced or waived for good cause.
(c)Any money that is received by the office pursuant to this section shall be paid into the General Fund.
127685.(a)The office may adopt regulations or issue guidance for the implementation of this chapter.
(b)The office may consult with the Department of Managed Health Care, the Department of Insurance, the California State Board of Pharmacy, and any state purchaser of prescription drugs, or an entity acting on behalf of a state purchaser, in issuing guidance or adopting necessary regulations pursuant to subdivision (a), in posting information on its Internet Web site pursuant to this chapter, and in taking any other action for the purpose of implementing this chapter.
SEC. 4.Section 10123.204 10123.205 is added to the Insurance Code, to read:10123.204.10123.205.(a)(1)A health insurer that reports rate information pursuant to Section 10181.3 or 10181.45 shall report the information described in paragraph (2) to the department no later than October 1 of each year, beginning October 1, 2018.
(2)For all covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be reported:
(A)The 25 most frequently prescribed drugs.
(B)The 25 most costly drugs by total annual plan spending.
(C)The 25 drugs with the highest year-over-year increase in total annual plan spending.
(b)The department shall compile the information reported pursuant to subdivision (a) into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. The data in the report shall be aggregated and shall not reveal information specific to individual health care service plans.
(c)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
(d)By January 1 of each year, beginning January 1, 2018, the department shall publish on its Internet Web site the report required pursuant to subdivision (b).
(e)After the report required in subdivision (b) is released, the department shall include the report as part of the public meeting required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 10181.45.
(f)Except for the report required pursuant to subdivision (b), the department shall keep confidential all of the information provided to the department pursuant to this section, and the information shall be protected from public disclosure.
SEC. 5.Section 10181.45 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10181.45.(a)For large group health insurance policies, each health insurer shall file with the department the weighted average rate increase for all large group benefit designs during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following calendar year. The average shall be weighted by the number of insureds in each large group benefit design in the insurers large group market and adjusted to the most commonly sold large group benefit design by enrollment during the 12-month period. For the purposes of this section, the large group benefit design includes, but is not limited to, benefits such as basic health care services and prescription drugs. The large group benefit design shall not include cost sharing, including, but not limited to, deductibles, copays, and coinsurance.
(b)(1)A health insurer shall also submit any other information required pursuant to any regulation adopted by the department to comply with this article.
(2)The department shall conduct an annual public meeting regarding large group rates within three months of posting the aggregate information described in this section in order to permit a public discussion of the reasons for the changes in the rates, benefits, and cost sharing in the large group market. The meeting shall be held in either the Los Angeles area or the San Francisco Bay area.
(c)A health insurer subject to subdivision (a) shall also disclose the following for the aggregate rate information for the large group market submitted under this section:
(1)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, number and percentage of rate changes reviewed by the following:
(A)Plan year.
(B)Segment type, including whether the rate is community rated, in whole or in part.
(C)Product type.
(D)Number of insureds.
(E)The number of products sold that have materially different benefits, cost sharing, or other elements of benefit design.
(2)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, any factors affecting the base rate, and the actuarial basis for those factors, including all of the following:
(A)Geographic region.
(B)Age, including age rating factors.
(C)Occupation.
(D)Industry.
(E)Health status factors, including, but not limited to, experience and utilization.
(F)Employee, and employee and dependents, including a description of the family composition used.
(G)Insureds share of premiums.
(H)Insureds cost sharing, including cost sharing for prescription drugs.
(I)Covered benefits in addition to basic health care services, as defined in Section 1345 of the Health and Safety Code, and other benefits mandated under this article.
(J)Which market segment, if any, is fully experience rated and which market segment, if any, is in part experience rated and in part community rated.
(K)Any other factor that affects the rate that is not otherwise specified.
(3)(A)The insurers overall annual medical trend factor assumptions for all benefits and by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology for the applicable 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year. A health insurer that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the health insurers insureds shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories, to the maximum extent possible, that are the same or similar to those used by other insurers.
(B)The amount of the projected trend separately attributable to the use of services, price inflation, and fees and risk for annual policy trends by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology. A health insurer that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the insureds shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories that are, to the maximum extent possible, the same or similar to those used by other insurers.
(C)A comparison of the aggregate per insured per month costs and rate of changes over the last five years for each of the following:
(i)Premiums.
(ii)Claims costs, if any.
(iii)Administrative expenses.
(iv)Taxes and fees.
(D)Any changes in insured cost sharing over the prior year associated with the submitted rate information, including both of the following:
(i)Actual copays, coinsurance, deductibles, annual out of pocket maximums, and any other cost sharing by the benefit categories determined by the department.
(ii)Any aggregate changes in insured cost sharing over the prior years as measured by the weighted average actuarial value, weighted by the number of insureds.
(E)Any changes in insured benefits over the prior year, including a description of benefits added or eliminated as well as any aggregate changes as measured as a percentage of the aggregate claims costs, listed by the categories determined by the department.
(F)Any cost containment and quality improvement efforts made since the insurers prior years information pursuant to this section for the same category of health insurer. To the extent possible, the insurer shall describe any significant new health care cost containment and quality improvement efforts and provide an estimate of potential savings together with an estimated cost or savings for the projection period.
(G)The number of products covered by the information that incurred the excise tax paid by the health insurer.
(4)(A)For covered prescription generic drugs excluding specialty generic drugs, prescription brand name drugs excluding specialty drugs, and prescription brand name and generic specialty drugs dispensed at a pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be disclosed:
(i)The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drug costs for the prior year for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(ii)The year-over-year increase, as a percentage, in total spending for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(iii)The year-over-year increase in per-member, per-month costs for drug prices compared to other components of the health care premium.
(iv)The specialty tier formulary list.
(B)The insurer shall include the percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drugs administered in a doctors office that are covered under the medical benefit as separate from the pharmacy benefit, if available.
(C)(i)The insurer shall include information on its use of a pharmacy benefit manager, if any, including which components of the prescription drug coverage described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) are managed by the pharmacy benefit manager.
(ii)The insurer shall also include the name or names of the pharmacy benefit manager, or managers if the insurer uses more than one.
(d)The information required pursuant to this section shall be submitted to the department on or before October 1, 2016, and on or before October 1 annually thereafter. Information submitted pursuant to this section is subject to Section 10181.7.
(e)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
SEC. 6.The Legislature finds and declares that Sections 1 and 4 of this act, which add Section 1367.245 1367.243 to the Health and Safety Code and Section 10123.204 10123.205 to the Insurance Code, respectively, impose a limitation on the publics right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies within the meaning of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution. Pursuant to that constitutional provision, the Legislature makes the following findings to demonstrate the interest protected by this limitation and the need for protecting that interest:
In order to protect proprietary, confidential information regarding health care service plan and health insurer prescription drug utilization and spending information that is specific to the plan or insurer and to protect the integrity of the competitive market, it is necessary that this act limit the publics right of access to that information.
SEC. 7.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
(a)(1)A health care service plan that reports rate information pursuant to Section 1385.03 or 1385.045 shall report the information described in paragraph (2) to the department no later than October 1 of each year, beginning October 1, 2018.
(2)For all covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be reported:
(A)The 25 most frequently prescribed drugs.
(B)The 25 most costly drugs by total annual plan spending.
(C)The 25 drugs with the highest year-over-year increase in total annual plan spending.
(b)The department shall compile the information reported pursuant to subdivision (a) into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. The data in the report shall be aggregated and shall not reveal information specific to individual health care service plans.
(c)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
(d)By January 1 of each year, beginning January 1, 2019, the department shall publish on its Internet Web site the report required pursuant to subdivision (b).
(e)After the report required in subdivision (b) is released, the department shall include the report as part of the public meeting required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 1385.045.
(f)Except for the report required pursuant to subdivision (b), the department shall keep confidential all of the information provided to the department pursuant to this section, and that information shall be exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code). the information shall be protected from public disclosure.
SEC. 2.Section 1385.045 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1385.045.(a)For large group health care service plan contracts, each health plan shall file with the department the weighted average rate increase for all large group benefit designs during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following calendar year. The average shall be weighted by the number of enrollees in each large group benefit design in the plans large group market and adjusted to the most commonly sold large group benefit design by enrollment during the 12-month period. For the purposes of this section, the large group benefit design includes, but is not limited to, benefits such as basic health care services and prescription drugs. The large group benefit design shall not include cost sharing, including, but not limited to, deductibles, copays, and coinsurance.
(b)(1)A plan shall also submit any other information required pursuant to any regulation adopted by the department to comply with this article.
(2)The department shall conduct an annual public meeting regarding large group rates within three months of posting the aggregate information described in this section in order to permit a public discussion of the reasons for the changes in the rates, benefits, and cost sharing in the large group market. The meeting shall be held in either the Los Angeles area or the San Francisco Bay area.
(c)A health care service plan subject to subdivision (a) shall also disclose the following for the aggregate rate information for the large group market submitted under this section:
(1)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, number and percentage of rate changes reviewed by the following:
(A)Plan year.
(B)Segment type, including whether the rate is community rated, in whole or in part.
(C)Product type.
(D)Number of enrollees.
(E)The number of products sold that have materially different benefits, cost sharing, or other elements of benefit design.
(2)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, any factors affecting the base rate, and the actuarial basis for those factors, including all of the following:
(A)Geographic region.
(B)Age, including age rating factors.
(C)Occupation.
(D)Industry.
(E)Health status factors, including, but not limited to, experience and utilization.
(F)Employee, and employee and dependents, including a description of the family composition used.
(G)Enrollees share of premiums.
(H)Enrollees cost sharing, including cost sharing for prescription drugs.
(I)Covered benefits in addition to basic health care services, as defined in Section 1345, and other benefits mandated under this article.
(J)Which market segment, if any, is fully experience rated and which market segment, if any, is in part experience rated and in part community rated.
(K)Any other factor that affects the rate that is not otherwise specified.
(3)(A)The plans overall annual medical trend factor assumptions for all benefits and by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology for the applicable 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year. A health plan that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the enrollees of the plan shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories, to the maximum extent possible, that are the same as, or similar to, those used by other plans.
(B)The amount of the projected trend separately attributable to the use of services, price inflation, and fees and risk for annual plan contract trends by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology. A health plan that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the enrollees of the plan shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories that are, to the maximum extent possible, the same or similar to those used by other plans.
(C)A comparison of the aggregate per enrollee per month costs and rate of changes over the last five years for each of the following:
(i)Premiums.
(ii)Claims costs, if any.
(iii)Administrative expenses.
(iv)Taxes and fees.
(D)Any changes in enrollee cost sharing over the prior year associated with the submitted rate information, including both of the following:
(i)Actual copays, coinsurance, deductibles, annual out of pocket maximums, and any other cost sharing by the benefit categories determined by the department.
(ii)Any aggregate changes in enrollee cost sharing over the prior years as measured by the weighted average actuarial value, weighted by the number of enrollees.
(E)Any changes in enrollee benefits over the prior year, including a description of benefits added or eliminated, as well as any aggregate changes, as measured as a percentage of the aggregate claims costs, listed by the categories determined by the department.
(F)Any cost containment and quality improvement efforts since the plans prior years information pursuant to this section for the same category of health benefit plan. To the extent possible, the plan shall describe any significant new health care cost containment and quality improvement efforts and provide an estimate of potential savings together with an estimated cost or savings for the projection period.
(G)The number of products covered by the information that incurred the excise tax paid by the health plan.
(4)(A)For covered prescription generic drugs excluding specialty generic drugs, prescription brand name drugs excluding specialty drugs, and prescription brand name and generic specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be disclosed:
(i)The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drug costs for the prior year for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(ii)The year-over-year increase, as a percentage, in total spending for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(iii)The year-over-year increase in per-member, per-month costs for drug prices compared to other components of the health care premium.
(iv)The specialty tier formulary list.
(B)The plan shall include the percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drugs administered in a doctors office that are covered under the medical benefit as separate from the pharmacy benefit, if available.
(C)(i)The plan shall include information on its use of a pharmacy benefit manager, if any, including which components of the prescription drug coverage described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) are managed by the pharmacy benefit manager.
(ii)The plan shall also include the name or names of the pharmacy benefit manager, or managers if the plan uses more than one.
(d)The information required pursuant to this section shall be submitted to the department on or before October 1, 2018, and on or before October 1 annually thereafter. Information submitted pursuant to this section is subject to Section 1385.07.
(e)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
SEC. 3.Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 127675) is added to Part 2 of Division 107 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:9.Prescription Drug Pricing for Purchasers127675.(a)This chapter shall apply to a manufacturer of a prescription drug that is purchased or reimbursed by any of the following:
(1)A state purchaser in California, including, but not limited to, the Public Employees Retirement System, the State Department of Health Care Services, the Department of General Services, and the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, or an entity acting on behalf of a state purchaser.
(2)A licensed health care service plan.
(3)A health insurer holding a valid outstanding certificate of authority from the Insurance Commissioner.
(4)A pharmacy benefit manager as defined in subdivision (j) of Section 4430 of the Business and Professions Code.
(b)For the purposes of this chapter, the term office shall mean the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development.
127677.(a)A manufacturer of a prescription drug shall notify each purchaser described in Section 127675 that it is increasing the wholesale acquisition cost of a prescription drug if any of the following circumstances apply:
(1)The wholesale acquisition cost for the prescription drug is under the threshold set for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)) and if the cumulative increase is more than 25 percent over the three calendar years prior to the current year.
(2)The wholesale acquisition cost for the prescription drug is over the threshold set for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)), and if the cumulative increase is more than 10 percent over the three calendar years prior to the current year.
(b)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall be provided in writing at least 90 days prior to the planned effective date of the increase.
(c)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall include a statement of any changes or improvements to the clinical efficacy of the drug that explain the increase in wholesale acquisition cost. The manufacturer shall state if there are no changes or improvements made to the clinical efficacy of the drug subject to the notice.
(d)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall not be required for a prescription drug that is not already purchased or reimbursed by a purchaser described in subdivision (a), except for prescription drugs described in Section 127681.
(e)If a pharmacy benefit manager receives a notice of an increase in wholesale acquisition cost consistent with subdivision (a), it shall notify its large contracting public and private purchasers of the increase. For the purposes of this section, a large purchaser means a purchaser that provides coverage to more than 500 covered lives.
127679.(a)At the time that the increase in wholesale acquisition cost described in subdivision (a) of Section 127677 takes effect, a manufacturer shall report all of the following information to the office:
(1)A description of the specific financial and nonfinancial factors used to make the decision to increase the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug and the amount of the increase, including, but not limited to, an explanation of how these factors justify the increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug.
(2)The previous years marketing budget for the drug, including the budget for patient assistance programs specific to the drug.
(3)A schedule of wholesale acquisition cost increases for the drug for the previous five years if the drug was manufactured by the company.
(4)If the drug was acquired by the manufacturer within the previous five years, all of the following information:
(A)The wholesale acquisition cost of the drug at the time of acquisition and in the calendar year prior to acquisition.
(B)The name of the company from which the drug was acquired, the date acquired, and the purchase price.
(C)The year the drug was introduced to market and the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug at the time of introduction.
(5)The patent expiration date of the drug if it is under patent.
(6)If the drug is a multiple source drug, an innovator multiple source drug, a noninnovator multiple source drug, or a single source drug, as defined in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (7) of subdivision (k) of Section 1396r8 of Title 42 of the United States Code.
(7)Documentation of increased clinical efficacy of the drug, if any. The manufacturer shall state if the drug subject to the notice does not exceed the clinical efficacy of existing treatments.
(8)Volume of sales of the drug in the United States for the previous year.
(b)The office shall publish the information provided to it pursuant to this section on its Internet Web site on no less than a quarterly basis. The information shall be published in a manner that identifies the information that is disclosed on a per-drug basis and shall not be aggregated in a manner that would not allow identification of the drug.
127681.(a)A manufacturer of a prescription drug shall notify the office in writing if it is introducing a new prescription drug to market at a wholesale acquisition cost that exceeds the threshold set for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)). The notice shall be provided in writing within three days of commercial availability. after approval by the federal Food and Drug Administration. A manufacturer may make this notification pending approval by the federal Food and Drug Administration, if commercial availability is expected within three days of approval.
(b)Within 30 days of No later than 30 days after notification pursuant to this section, a manufacturer shall report all of the following information to the office:
(1)A description of the marketing and pricing plans used in the launch of the new drug in the United States and internationally.
(2)The estimated volume of patients that may be prescribed the drug.
(3)Any documentation showing increased efficacy of the drug compared to existing treatments. The manufacturer shall state if there are no changes or improvements made to the clinical efficacy of the drug subject to the notice.
(4)If the drug was granted breakthrough therapy designation or priority review by the federal Food and Drug Administration prior to final approval.
(5)The expected marketing budget for the drug, including the budget for patient assistance programs.
(6)The date and price of acquisition if the drug was not developed by the manufacturer.
(c)The office shall publish the information provided to it pursuant to this section on its Internet Web site on no less than a monthly basis. The information shall be published in a manner that identifies the information that is disclosed on a per-drug basis and shall not be aggregated in a manner that would not allow identification of the drug.
127683.(a)A manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to the requirements of this chapter shall comply with this chapter. The office shall be responsible for the enforcement of these provisions.
(b)(1)A manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this chapter that does not report the information required pursuant to this chapter to state purchasers, health care service plans, health insurers, or pharmacy benefit managers is liable for a civil penalty of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per day for every day after the applicable notification period that the required information is not reported.
(2)A civil penalty shall be assessed and recovered in a civil action brought by the office in the name of the people of the State of California. Assessment of a civil penalty may, at the request of any manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this chapter, be reviewed on appeal, and the penalty may be reduced or waived for good cause.
(c)Any money that is received by the office pursuant to this section shall be paid into the General Fund.
127685.(a)The office may adopt regulations or issue guidance for the implementation of this chapter.
(b)The office may consult with the Department of Managed Health Care, the Department of Insurance, the California State Board of Pharmacy, and any state purchaser of prescription drugs, or an entity acting on behalf of a state purchaser, in issuing guidance or adopting necessary regulations pursuant to subdivision (a), in posting information on its Internet Web site pursuant to this chapter, and in taking any other action for the purpose of implementing this chapter.
SEC. 4.Section 10123.204 is added to the Insurance Code, to read:10123.204.(a)(1)A health insurer that reports rate information pursuant to Section 10181.3 or 10181.45 shall report the information described in paragraph (2) to the department no later than October 1 of each year, beginning October 1, 2018.
(2)For all covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be reported:
(A)The 25 most frequently prescribed drugs.
(B)The 25 most costly drugs by total annual plan spending.
(C)The 25 drugs with the highest year-over-year increase in total annual plan spending.
(b)The department shall compile the information reported pursuant to subdivision (a) into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. The data in the report shall be aggregated and shall not reveal information specific to individual health care service plans.
(c)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
(d)By January 1 of each year, beginning January 1, 2018, the department shall publish on its Internet Web site the report required pursuant to subdivision (b).
(e)After the report required in subdivision (b) is released, the department shall include the report as part of the public meeting required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 10181.45.
(f)Except for the report required pursuant to subdivision (b), the department shall keep confidential all of the information provided to the department pursuant to this section, and that information shall be exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code). the information shall be protected from public disclosure.
SEC. 5.Section 10181.45 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10181.45.(a)For large group health insurance policies, each health insurer shall file with the department the weighted average rate increase for all large group benefit designs during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following calendar year. The average shall be weighted by the number of insureds in each large group benefit design in the insurers large group market and adjusted to the most commonly sold large group benefit design by enrollment during the 12-month period. For the purposes of this section, the large group benefit design includes, but is not limited to, benefits such as basic health care services and prescription drugs. The large group benefit design shall not include cost sharing, including, but not limited to, deductibles, copays, and coinsurance.
(b)(1)A health insurer shall also submit any other information required pursuant to any regulation adopted by the department to comply with this article.
(2)The department shall conduct an annual public meeting regarding large group rates within three months of posting the aggregate information described in this section in order to permit a public discussion of the reasons for the changes in the rates, benefits, and cost sharing in the large group market. The meeting shall be held in either the Los Angeles area or the San Francisco Bay area.
(c)A health insurer subject to subdivision (a) shall also disclose the following for the aggregate rate information for the large group market submitted under this section:
(1)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, number and percentage of rate changes reviewed by the following:
(A)Plan year.
(B)Segment type, including whether the rate is community rated, in whole or in part.
(C)Product type.
(D)Number of insureds.
(E)The number of products sold that have materially different benefits, cost sharing, or other elements of benefit design.
(2)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, any factors affecting the base rate, and the actuarial basis for those factors, including all of the following:
(A)Geographic region.
(B)Age, including age rating factors.
(C)Occupation.
(D)Industry.
(E)Health status factors, including, but not limited to, experience and utilization.
(F)Employee, and employee and dependents, including a description of the family composition used.
(G)Insureds share of premiums.
(H)Insureds cost sharing, including cost sharing for prescription drugs.
(I)Covered benefits in addition to basic health care services, as defined in Section 1345 of the Health and Safety Code, and other benefits mandated under this article.
(J)Which market segment, if any, is fully experience rated and which market segment, if any, is in part experience rated and in part community rated.
(K)Any other factor that affects the rate that is not otherwise specified.
(3)(A)The insurers overall annual medical trend factor assumptions for all benefits and by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology for the applicable 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year. A health insurer that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the health insurers insureds shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories, to the maximum extent possible, that are the same or similar to those used by other insurers.
(B)The amount of the projected trend separately attributable to the use of services, price inflation, and fees and risk for annual policy trends by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology. A health insurer that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the insureds shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories that are, to the maximum extent possible, the same or similar to those used by other insurers.
(C)A comparison of the aggregate per insured per month costs and rate of changes over the last five years for each of the following:
(i)Premiums.
(ii)Claims costs, if any.
(iii)Administrative expenses.
(iv)Taxes and fees.
(D)Any changes in insured cost sharing over the prior year associated with the submitted rate information, including both of the following:
(i)Actual copays, coinsurance, deductibles, annual out of pocket maximums, and any other cost sharing by the benefit categories determined by the department.
(ii)Any aggregate changes in insured cost sharing over the prior years as measured by the weighted average actuarial value, weighted by the number of insureds.
(E)Any changes in insured benefits over the prior year, including a description of benefits added or eliminated as well as any aggregate changes as measured as a percentage of the aggregate claims costs, listed by the categories determined by the department.
(F)Any cost containment and quality improvement efforts made since the insurers prior years information pursuant to this section for the same category of health insurer. To the extent possible, the insurer shall describe any significant new health care cost containment and quality improvement efforts and provide an estimate of potential savings together with an estimated cost or savings for the projection period.
(G)The number of products covered by the information that incurred the excise tax paid by the health insurer.
(4)(A)For covered prescription generic drugs excluding specialty generic drugs, prescription brand name drugs excluding specialty drugs, and prescription brand name and generic specialty drugs dispensed at a pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be disclosed:
(i)The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drug costs for the prior year for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(ii)The year-over-year increase, as a percentage, in total spending for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(iii)The year-over-year increase in per-member, per-month costs for drug prices compared to other components of the health care premium.
(iv)The specialty tier formulary list.
(B)The insurer shall include the percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drugs administered in a doctors office that are covered under the medical benefit as separate from the pharmacy benefit, if available.
(C)(i)The insurer shall include information on its use of a pharmacy benefit manager, if any, including which components of the prescription drug coverage described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) are managed by the pharmacy benefit manager.
(ii)The insurer shall also include the name or names of the pharmacy benefit manager, or managers if the insurer uses more than one.
(d)The information required pursuant to this section shall be submitted to the department on or before October 1, 2016, and on or before October 1 annually thereafter. Information submitted pursuant to this section is subject to Section 10181.7.
(e)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
SEC. 6.The Legislature finds and declares that Sections 1 and 4 of this act, which add Section 1367.245 to the Health and Safety Code and Section 10123.204 to the Insurance Code, respectively, impose a limitation on the publics right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies within the meaning of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution. Pursuant to that constitutional provision, the Legislature makes the following findings to demonstrate the interest protected by this limitation and the need for protecting that interest:
In order to protect proprietary, confidential information regarding health care service plan and health insurer prescription drug utilization and spending information that is specific to the plan or insurer and to protect the integrity of the competitive market, it is necessary that this act limit the publics right of access to that information.
SEC. 7.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
(a)(1)A health care service plan that reports rate information pursuant to Section 1385.03 or 1385.045 shall report the information described in paragraph (2) to the department no later than October 1 of each year, beginning October 1, 2018.
(2)For all covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be reported:
(A)The 25 most frequently prescribed drugs.
(B)The 25 most costly drugs by total annual plan spending.
(C)The 25 drugs with the highest year-over-year increase in total annual plan spending.
(b)The department shall compile the information reported pursuant to subdivision (a) into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. The data in the report shall be aggregated and shall not reveal information specific to individual health care service plans.
(c)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
(d)By January 1 of each year, beginning January 1, 2019, the department shall publish on its Internet Web site the report required pursuant to subdivision (b).
(e)After the report required in subdivision (b) is released, the department shall include the report as part of the public meeting required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 1385.045.
(f)Except for the report required pursuant to subdivision (b), the department shall keep confidential all of the information provided to the department pursuant to this section, and that information shall be exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code).
SEC. 2.Section 1385.045 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1385.045.(a)For large group health care service plan contracts, each health plan shall file with the department the weighted average rate increase for all large group benefit designs during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following calendar year. The average shall be weighted by the number of enrollees in each large group benefit design in the plans large group market and adjusted to the most commonly sold large group benefit design by enrollment during the 12-month period. For the purposes of this section, the large group benefit design includes, but is not limited to, benefits such as basic health care services and prescription drugs. The large group benefit design shall not include cost sharing, including, but not limited to, deductibles, copays, and coinsurance.
(b)(1)A plan shall also submit any other information required pursuant to any regulation adopted by the department to comply with this article.
(2)The department shall conduct an annual public meeting regarding large group rates within three months of posting the aggregate information described in this section in order to permit a public discussion of the reasons for the changes in the rates, benefits, and cost sharing in the large group market. The meeting shall be held in either the Los Angeles area or the San Francisco Bay area.
(c)A health care service plan subject to subdivision (a) shall also disclose the following for the aggregate rate information for the large group market submitted under this section:
(1)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, number and percentage of rate changes reviewed by the following:
(A)Plan year.
(B)Segment type, including whether the rate is community rated, in whole or in part.
(C)Product type.
(D)Number of enrollees.
(E)The number of products sold that have materially different benefits, cost sharing, or other elements of benefit design.
(2)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, any factors affecting the base rate, and the actuarial basis for those factors, including all of the following:
(A)Geographic region.
(B)Age, including age rating factors.
(C)Occupation.
(D)Industry.
(E)Health status factors, including, but not limited to, experience and utilization.
(F)Employee, and employee and dependents, including a description of the family composition used.
(G)Enrollees share of premiums.
(H)Enrollees cost sharing. sharing, including cost sharing for prescription drugs.
(I)Covered benefits in addition to basic health care services, as defined in Section 1345, and other benefits mandated under this article.
(J)Which market segment, if any, is fully experience rated and which market segment, if any, is in part experience rated and in part community rated.
(K)Any other factor that affects the rate that is not otherwise specified.
(3)(A)The plans overall annual medical trend factor assumptions for all benefits and by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology for the applicable 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year. A health plan that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the enrollees of the plan shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories, to the maximum extent possible, that are the same as, or similar to, those used by other plans.
(B)The amount of the projected trend separately attributable to the use of services, price inflation, and fees and risk for annual plan contract trends by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology. A health plan that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the enrollees of the plan shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories that are, to the maximum extent possible, the same or similar to those used by other plans.
(C)A comparison of the aggregate per enrollee per month costs and rate of changes over the last five years for each of the following:
(i)Premiums.
(ii)Claims costs, if any.
(iii)Administrative expenses.
(iv)Taxes and fees.
(D)Any changes in enrollee cost sharing over the prior year associated with the submitted rate information, including both of the following:
(i)Actual copays, coinsurance, deductibles, annual out of pocket maximums, and any other cost sharing by the benefit categories determined by the department.
(ii)Any aggregate changes in enrollee cost sharing over the prior years as measured by the weighted average actuarial value, weighted by the number of enrollees.
(E)Any changes in enrollee benefits over the prior year, including a description of benefits added or eliminated, as well as any aggregate changes, as measured as a percentage of the aggregate claims costs, listed by the categories determined by the department.
(F)Any cost containment and quality improvement efforts since the plans prior years information pursuant to this section for the same category of health benefit plan. To the extent possible, the plan shall describe any significant new health care cost containment and quality improvement efforts and provide an estimate of potential savings together with an estimated cost or savings for the projection period.
(G)The number of products covered by the information that incurred the excise tax paid by the health plan.
(4)(A)For covered prescription generic drugs excluding specialty generic drugs, prescription brand name drugs excluding specialty drugs, and prescription brand name and generic specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be disclosed:
(i)The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drug costs for the prior year for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(ii)The year-over-year increase, as a percentage, in total spending for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(iii)The year-over-year increase in per-member, per-month costs for drug prices compared to other components of the health care premium.
(iv)The specialty tier formulary list.
(B)The plan shall include the percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drugs administered in a doctors office that are covered under the medical benefit as separate from the pharmacy benefit, if available.
(C)(i)The plan shall include information on its use of a pharmacy benefit manager, if any, including which components of the prescription drug coverage described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) are managed by the pharmacy benefit manager.
(ii)The plan shall also include the name or names of the pharmacy benefit manager, or managers if the plan uses more than one.
(d)The information required pursuant to this section shall be submitted to the department on or before October 1, 2016, 2018, and on or before October 1 annually thereafter. Information submitted pursuant to this section is subject to Section 1385.07.(e)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
SEC. 3.Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 127675) is added to Part 2 of Division 107 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:9.Prescription Drug Pricing for Purchasers127675.(a)This chapter shall apply to a manufacturer of a prescription drug that is purchased or reimbursed by any of the following:
(1)A state purchaser in California, including, but not limited to, the Public Employees Retirement System, the State Department of Health Care Services, the Department of General Services, and the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, or an entity acting on behalf of a state purchaser.
(2)A licensed health care service plan.
(3)A health insurer holding a valid outstanding certificate of authority from the Insurance Commissioner.
(4)A pharmacy benefit manager as defined in subdivision (j) of Section 4430 of the Business and Professions Code.
(b)For the purposes of this chapter, the term office shall mean the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development.
127677.(a)A manufacturer of a prescription drug shall notify each purchaser described in Section 127675 that it is increasing the wholesale acquisition cost of a prescription drug if any of the following circumstances apply:
(1)The wholesale acquisition cost for the prescription drug is under the threshold set for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)) and if the cumulative increase is more than 25 percent over the three calendar years prior to the current year.
(2)The wholesale acquisition cost for the prescription drug is over the threshold set for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)), and if the cumulative increase is more than 10 percent over the three calendar years prior to the current year.
(b)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall be provided in writing at least 90 days prior to the planned effective date of the increase.
(c)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall include a statement of any changes or improvements to the clinical efficacy of the drug that explain the increase in wholesale acquisition cost. The manufacturer shall state if there are no changes or improvements made to the clinical efficacy of the drug subject to the notice.
(d)The notice required by subdivision (a) shall not be required for a prescription drug that is not already purchased or reimbursed by a purchaser described in subdivision (a), except for prescription drugs described in Section 127681.
(e)If a pharmacy benefit manager receives a notice of an increase in wholesale acquisition cost consistent with subdivision (a), it shall notify its large contracting public and private purchasers of the increase. For the purposes of this section, a large purchaser means a purchaser that provides coverage to more than 500 covered lives.
127679.(a)At the time that the increase in wholesale acquisition cost described in subdivision (a) of Section 127677 takes effect, a manufacturer shall report all of the following information to the office:
(1)A description of the specific financial and nonfinancial factors used to make the decision to increase the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug and the amount of the increase, including, but not limited to, an explanation of how these factors justify the increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug.
(2)The previous years marketing budget for the drug, including the budget for patient assistance programs specific to the drug.
(3)A schedule of wholesale acquisition cost increases for the drug for the previous five years if the drug was manufactured by the company.
(4)If the drug was acquired by the manufacturer within the previous five years, all of the following information:
(A)The wholesale acquisition cost of the drug at the time of acquisition and in the calendar year prior to acquisition.
(B)The name of the company from which the drug was acquired, the date acquired, and the purchase price.
(C)The year the drug was introduced to market and the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug at the time of introduction.
(5)The patent expiration date of the drug if it is under patent.
(6)If the drug is a multiple source drug, an innovator multiple source drug, a noninnovator multiple source drug, or a single source drug, as defined in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (7) of subdivision (k) of Section 1396r8 of Title 42 of the United States Code.
(7)Documentation of increased clinical efficacy of the drug, if any. The manufacturer shall state if the drug subject to the notice does not exceed the clinical efficacy of existing treatments.
(8)Volume of sales of the drug in the United States for the previous year.
(b)The office shall publish the information provided to it pursuant to this section on its Internet Web site on no less than a quarterly basis. The information shall be published in a manner that identifies the information that is disclosed on a per-drug basis and shall not be aggregated in a manner that would not allow identification of the drug.
127681.(a)A manufacturer of a prescription drug shall notify the office in writing if it is introducing a new prescription drug to market at a wholesale acquisition cost that exceeds the threshold set for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)). The notice shall be provided in writing within three days of commercial availability. A manufacturer may make this notification pending approval by the federal Food and Drug Administration, if commercial availability is expected within three days of approval.
(b)Within 30 days of notification pursuant to this section, a manufacturer shall report all of the following information to the office:
(1)A description of the marketing and pricing plans used in the launch of the new drug in the United States and internationally.
(2)The estimated volume of patients that may be prescribed the drug.
(3)Any documentation showing increased efficacy of the drug compared to existing treatments. The manufacturer shall state if there are no changes or improvements made to the clinical efficacy of the drug subject to the notice.
(4)If the drug was granted breakthrough therapy designation or priority review by the federal Food and Drug Administration prior to final approval.
(5)The expected marketing budget for the drug, including the budget for patient assistance programs.
(6)The date and price of acquisition if the drug was not developed by the manufacturer.
(c)The office shall publish the information provided to it pursuant to this section on its Internet Web site on no less than a monthly basis. The information shall be published in a manner that identifies the information that is disclosed on a per-drug basis and shall not be aggregated in a manner that would not allow identification of the drug.
127683.(a)A manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to the requirements of this chapter shall comply with this chapter. The office shall be responsible for the enforcement of these provisions.
(b)(1)A manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this chapter that does not report the information required pursuant to this chapter to state purchasers, health care service plans, health insurers, or pharmacy benefit managers is liable for a civil penalty of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per day for every day after the applicable notification period that the required information is not reported.
(2)A civil penalty shall be assessed and recovered in a civil action brought by the office in the name of the people of the State of California. Assessment of a civil penalty may, at the request of any manufacturer of a prescription drug subject to this chapter, be reviewed on appeal, and the penalty may be reduced or waived for good cause.
(c)Any money that is received by the office pursuant to this section shall be paid into the General Fund.
127685.(a)The office may adopt regulations or issue guidance for the implementation of this chapter.
(b)The office may consult with the Department of Managed Health Care, the Department of Insurance, the California State Board of Pharmacy, and any state purchaser of prescription drugs, or an entity acting on behalf of a state purchaser, in issuing guidance or adopting necessary regulations pursuant to subdivision (a), in posting information on its Internet Web site pursuant to this chapter, and in taking any other action for the purpose of implementing this chapter.
SEC. 4.Section 10123.204 is added to the Insurance Code, to read:10123.204.(a)(1)A health insurer that reports rate information pursuant to Section 10181.3 or 10181.45 shall report the information described in paragraph (2) to the department no later than October 1 of each year, beginning October 1, 2018.
(2)For all covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be reported:
(A)The 25 most frequently prescribed drugs.
(B)The 25 most costly drugs by total annual plan spending.
(C)The 25 drugs with the highest year-over-year increase in total annual plan spending.
(b)The department shall compile the information reported pursuant to subdivision (a) into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. The data in the report shall be aggregated and shall not reveal information specific to individual health care service plans.
(c)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
(d)By January 1 of each year, beginning January 1, 2018, the department shall publish on its Internet Web site the report required pursuant to subdivision (b).
(e)After the report required in subdivision (b) is released, the department shall include the report as part of the public meeting required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 10181.45.
(f)Except for the report required pursuant to subdivision (b), the department shall keep confidential all of the information provided to the department pursuant to this section, and that information shall be exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code).
SEC. 5.Section 10181.45 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10181.45.(a)For large group health insurance policies, each health insurer shall file with the department the weighted average rate increase for all large group benefit designs during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following calendar year. The average shall be weighted by the number of insureds in each large group benefit design in the insurers large group market and adjusted to the most commonly sold large group benefit design by enrollment during the 12-month period. For the purposes of this section, the large group benefit design includes, but is not limited to, benefits such as basic health care services and prescription drugs. The large group benefit design shall not include cost sharing, including, but not limited to, deductibles, copays, and coinsurance.
(b)(1)A health insurer shall also submit any other information required pursuant to any regulation adopted by the department to comply with this article.
(2)The department shall conduct an annual public meeting regarding large group rates within three months of posting the aggregate information described in this section in order to permit a public discussion of the reasons for the changes in the rates, benefits, and cost sharing in the large group market. The meeting shall be held in either the Los Angeles area or the San Francisco Bay area.
(c)A health insurer subject to subdivision (a) shall also disclose the following for the aggregate rate information for the large group market submitted under this section:
(1)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, number and percentage of rate changes reviewed by the following:
(A)Plan year.
(B)Segment type, including whether the rate is community rated, in whole or in part.
(C)Product type.
(D)Number of insureds.
(E)The number of products sold that have materially different benefits, cost sharing, or other elements of benefit design.
(2)For rates effective during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year, any factors affecting the base rate, and the actuarial basis for those factors, including all of the following:
(A)Geographic region.
(B)Age, including age rating factors.
(C)Occupation.
(D)Industry.
(E)Health status factors, including, but not limited to, experience and utilization.
(F)Employee, and employee and dependents, including a description of the family composition used.
(G)Insureds share of premiums.
(H)Insureds cost sharing. sharing, including cost sharing for prescription drugs.
(I)Covered benefits in addition to basic health care services, as defined in Section 1345 of the Health and Safety Code, and other benefits mandated under this article.
(J)Which market segment, if any, is fully experience rated and which market segment, if any, is in part experience rated and in part community rated.
(K)Any other factor that affects the rate that is not otherwise specified.
(3)(A)The insurers overall annual medical trend factor assumptions for all benefits and by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology for the applicable 12-month period ending January 1 of the following year. A health insurer that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the health insurers insureds shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories, to the maximum extent possible, that are the same or similar to those used by other insurers.
(B)The amount of the projected trend separately attributable to the use of services, price inflation, and fees and risk for annual policy trends by aggregate benefit category, including hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician services, prescription drugs and other ancillary services, laboratory, and radiology. A health insurer that exclusively contracts with no more than two medical groups in the state to provide or arrange for professional medical services for the insureds shall instead disclose the amount of its actual trend experience for the prior contract year by aggregate benefit category, using benefit categories that are, to the maximum extent possible, the same or similar to those used by other insurers.
(C)A comparison of the aggregate per insured per month costs and rate of changes over the last five years for each of the following:
(i)Premiums.
(ii)Claims costs, if any.
(iii)Administrative expenses.
(iv)Taxes and fees.
(D)Any changes in insured cost sharing over the prior year associated with the submitted rate information, including both of the following:
(i)Actual copays, coinsurance, deductibles, annual out of pocket maximums, and any other cost sharing by the benefit categories determined by the department.
(ii)Any aggregate changes in insured cost sharing over the prior years as measured by the weighted average actuarial value, weighted by the number of insureds.
(E)Any changes in insured benefits over the prior year, including a description of benefits added or eliminated as well as any aggregate changes as measured as a percentage of the aggregate claims costs, listed by the categories determined by the department.
(F)Any cost containment and quality improvement efforts made since the insurers prior years information pursuant to this section for the same category of health insurer. To the extent possible, the insurer shall describe any significant new health care cost containment and quality improvement efforts and provide an estimate of potential savings together with an estimated cost or savings for the projection period.
(G)The number of products covered by the information that incurred the excise tax paid by the health insurer.
(4)(A)For covered prescription generic drugs excluding specialty generic drugs, prescription brand name drugs excluding specialty drugs, and prescription brand name and generic specialty drugs dispensed at a pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following shall be disclosed:
(i)The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drug costs for the prior year for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(ii)The year-over-year increase, as a percentage, in total spending for each category of prescription drugs as defined in this subparagraph.
(iii)The year-over-year increase in per-member, per-month costs for drug prices compared to other components of the health care premium.
(iv)The specialty tier formulary list.
(B)The insurer shall include the percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drugs administered in a doctors office that are covered under the medical benefit as separate from the pharmacy benefit, if available.
(C)(i)The insurer shall include information on its use of a pharmacy benefit manager, if any, including which components of the prescription drug coverage described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) are managed by the pharmacy benefit manager.
(ii)The insurer shall also include the name or names of the pharmacy benefit manager, or managers if the insurer uses more than one.
(d)The information required pursuant to this section shall be submitted to the department on or before October 1, 2016, and on or before October 1 annually thereafter. Information submitted pursuant to this section is subject to Section 10181.7.
(e)For the purposes of this section, a specialty drug is one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program (Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173)).
SEC. 6.The Legislature finds and declares that Sections 1 and 4 of this act, which add Section 1367.245 to the Health and Safety Code and Section 10123.204 to the Insurance Code, respectively, impose a limitation on the publics right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies within the meaning of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution. Pursuant to that constitutional provision, the Legislature makes the following findings to demonstrate the interest protected by this limitation and the need for protecting that interest:
In order to protect proprietary, confidential information regarding health care service plan and health insurer prescription drug utilization and spending information that is specific to the plan or insurer and to protect the integrity of the competitive market, it is necessary that this act limit the publics right of access to that information.
SEC. 7.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
SECTION 1.The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a)Health care spending in the United States is twice the level of health care spending in other developed countries while life expectancy is often less.(b)Health care spending in the United States has climbed from about $1,000 per person to almost $9,000 per person while the rate of growth for health care spending in other developed countries has been much more modest.(c)High health care spending is paid for by individual consumers, employers, taxpayers, and other purchasers of health care services and coverage. While existing state and federal law limits the profit and overhead of health plans and health insurers, there are no similar limits on the profits and overhead of pharmaceutical manufacturers.(d)The United States has experienced significant growth in spending on prescription drugs so that total prescription drug costs in the United States exceeded $450 billion, or 16.7 percent of personal health care spending in 2015, up from $367 billion or 15.4 percent of personal health care spending in 2012. For persons under 65 years of age, the cost of outpatient prescription drug spending amounts to 19 percent of the premium dollar, and that 19 percent spent on outpatient drugs does not account for drugs administered by a health professional, such as chemotherapy or drugs administered in a hospital or other health facility, which further compounds spending on prescription drugs.(e)Specialty drug spending rose 30.9 percent between 2013 and 2014 while specialty drugs accounted for 1 percent of prescriptions in 2013. These drugs accounted for 25 percent of prescription drugs spending in 2013. Cancer drug prices doubled within the last decade, from an average of $5,000 per month to an average of $10,000 per month.(f)Approximately 75 percent of the increase in Medicaid spending on prescription drugs between 2013 and 2104 was due to increases in price. Many prescription drugs had increases in unit prices, including Ativan, which increased 1,264 percent between 2014 and 2015, and five other drugs that had unit cost increases of more than 300 percent between 2014 and 2015. From the fourth quarter of 2013 to the second quarter of 2016, Epi-Pen prices increased 15 percent every other quarter so that the price had increased 548 percent since 2007. Of the 20 drugs with the highest per unit cost increases in Medicaid, nine were generic drugs and those products had increases in price ranging from 140 percent to nearly 500 percent between 2014 and 2015.(g)The State of California spent more than $4 billion in taxpayer dollars on prescription drugs in the 201415 fiscal year and this amount did not include prescription drug spending for the almost ten million people enrolled in Medi-Cal managed care.(h)The 2016 Kaiser Health Foundation tracking poll found that 77 percent of Americans say prescription drug costs are unreasonable, 86 percent of Americans favor requiring drug companies to release information to the public on how drug prices are set, and 78 percent of Americans support limiting the amount drug companies can charge for high cost drugs for illnesses like cancer or hepatitis.(i)Despite intense public scrutiny and broad consumer concern about escalating prescription drug prices, prescription drug prices climbed by 7 percent in September 2016, while overall health care costs climbed only 2.1 percent with nondrug costs climbing even more modestly.SEC. 2.It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation requiring public and private purchasers of health care and health care coverage be given advance notice of price increases for the costs of prescription drugs in order to further the ability to predict and manage these costs and the public be given information about the justification, if any, for the prices of newly emerging medications and price increases for existing prescription drugs.The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)Health care spending in the United States is twice the level of health care spending in other developed countries while life expectancy is often less.
(b)Health care spending in the United States has climbed from about $1,000 per person to almost $9,000 per person while the rate of growth for health care spending in other developed countries has been much more modest.
(c)High health care spending is paid for by individual consumers, employers, taxpayers, and other purchasers of health care services and coverage. While existing state and federal law limits the profit and overhead of health plans and health insurers, there are no similar limits on the profits and overhead of pharmaceutical manufacturers.
(d)The United States has experienced significant growth in spending on prescription drugs so that total prescription drug costs in the United States exceeded $450 billion, or 16.7 percent of personal health care spending in 2015, up from $367 billion or 15.4 percent of personal health care spending in 2012. For persons under 65 years of age, the cost of outpatient prescription drug spending amounts to 19 percent of the premium dollar, and that 19 percent spent on outpatient drugs does not account for drugs administered by a health professional, such as chemotherapy or drugs administered in a hospital or other health facility, which further compounds spending on prescription drugs.
(e)Specialty drug spending rose 30.9 percent between 2013 and 2014 while specialty drugs accounted for 1 percent of prescriptions in 2013. These drugs accounted for 25 percent of prescription drugs spending in 2013. Cancer drug prices doubled within the last decade, from an average of $5,000 per month to an average of $10,000 per month.
(f)Approximately 75 percent of the increase in Medicaid spending on prescription drugs between 2013 and 2104 was due to increases in price. Many prescription drugs had increases in unit prices, including Ativan, which increased 1,264 percent between 2014 and 2015, and five other drugs that had unit cost increases of more than 300 percent between 2014 and 2015. From the fourth quarter of 2013 to the second quarter of 2016, Epi-Pen prices increased 15 percent every other quarter so that the price had increased 548 percent since 2007. Of the 20 drugs with the highest per unit cost increases in Medicaid, nine were generic drugs and those products had increases in price ranging from 140 percent to nearly 500 percent between 2014 and 2015.
(g)The State of California spent more than $4 billion in taxpayer dollars on prescription drugs in the 201415 fiscal year and this amount did not include prescription drug spending for the almost ten million people enrolled in Medi-Cal managed care.
(h)The 2016 Kaiser Health Foundation tracking poll found that 77 percent of Americans say prescription drug costs are unreasonable, 86 percent of Americans favor requiring drug companies to release information to the public on how drug prices are set, and 78 percent of Americans support limiting the amount drug companies can charge for high cost drugs for illnesses like cancer or hepatitis.
(i)Despite intense public scrutiny and broad consumer concern about escalating prescription drug prices, prescription drug prices climbed by 7 percent in September 2016, while overall health care costs climbed only 2.1 percent with nondrug costs climbing even more modestly.
SEC. 2.It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation requiring public and private purchasers of health care and health care coverage be given advance notice of price increases for the costs of prescription drugs in order to further the ability to predict and manage these costs and the public be given information about the justification, if any, for the prices of newly emerging medications and price increases for existing prescription drugs.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2017 | Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 603, Statutes of 2017. |
| Oct 9, 2017 | Approved by the Governor. |
| Sep 19, 2017 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 31. Noes 8.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling. |
| Sep 12, 2017 | In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending. |
| Sep 11, 2017 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Sep 5, 2017 | Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading. |
| Sep 1, 2017 | From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 3.) (September 1). |
| Aug 23, 2017 | August 23 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file. |
| Jul 20, 2017 | From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Jul 3, 2017 | From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 27). |
| Jun 8, 2017 | Referred to Com. on HEALTH. |
| May 31, 2017 | In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk. |
| May 30, 2017 | Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 10. Page 1262.) Ordered to the Assembly. |
| May 26, 2017 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| May 25, 2017 | From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1176.) (May 25). |
| May 19, 2017 | Set for hearing May 25. |
| May 15, 2017 | May 15 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file. |
| May 4, 2017 | Set for hearing May 15. |
| May 3, 2017 | May 8 hearing postponed by committee. |
| May 1, 2017 | Set for hearing May 8. |
| Apr 25, 2017 | Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Apr 24, 2017 | From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 807.) (April 19). |
| Mar 31, 2017 | Set for hearing April 19. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. |
| Mar 14, 2017 | From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. |
| Jan 12, 2017 | Referred to Com. on RLS. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | From printer. May be acted upon on or after January 5. |
| Dec 5, 2016 | Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2017 | Unfinished Business SB17 Hernandez et al. Concurrence | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Sep 11, 2017 | SB 17 Hernandez Senate Third Reading By WOOD | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Sep 1, 2017 | Do pass as amended. | Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Jun 27, 2017 | Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Assembly Standing Committee on Health |
Passed |
|
| May 30, 2017 | Senate 3rd Reading SB17 Hernandez et al. | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| May 25, 2017 | Do pass | Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| May 15, 2017 | Placed on suspense file | Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Apr 19, 2017 | Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Senate Standing Committee on Health |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| AARP | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| AFSCME, AFL-CIO | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| America'S Health Insurance Plans | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| American Academy of Pediatrics | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Anthem Blue Cross | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| APLA Health | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Asian Law Alliance | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Asian Pacific Health Foundation | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Association for Accessible Medicines | ** Against | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Association Of California Life And Health Insurance Companies | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Biocom | ** Against | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Biotechnology Innovation Organization | ** Against | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Blue Shield Of California | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California Academy Of Family Physicians | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California Alliance For Retired Americans | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California Association Of Health Plans | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California Association Of Health Underwriters | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California Black Health Network | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| california chapter of the american college of physicians | ** Support | Jun 26, 2017 |
| California Conference Board Of The Amalgamated Transit Union | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California Conference Of Machinists | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California Democratic Party | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| california health professional student alliance | ** Support | Jun 26, 2017 |
| California Hepatitis C Task Force | ** Against | Jun 26, 2017 |
| California Hospital Association | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California Iatse Council | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California Immigrant Policy Center | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California Labor Federation, Afl-Cio | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California LGBT Health and Human Services Network | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California Life Sciences Association | ** Against | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California Medical Association | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California Nurses Association | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California Optometric Association | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California Pan-Ethnic Health Network | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California Pharmacists Association | ** Support | Jun 26, 2017 |
| California Physicians Alliance | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California Professional Firefighters | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California Public Employees' Retirement System | ** Support | Jun 26, 2017 |
| California Retired Teachers Association | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California School Employees Association | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California State Retirees | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California Teachers Association | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| California Teamsters Public Affairs Council | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| california's senior advocates league | ** Against | Jun 26, 2017 |
| CalPERS | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| CALPIRG | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Carson Chamber of Commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Children Now | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| City and County of San Francisco | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Clovis Chamber Of Commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| community medical centers of fresno | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Conatus Pharmaceuticals | * Against | Apr 19, 2017 |
| Congress of California Seniors | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Consumer Federation Of California | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Consumers Union | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Courage Campaign | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Cupertino Chamber of Commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Eli Lilly & Company | ** Against | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Engineers and Scientists of California, IFPTE Local 20 | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Epilepsy California | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Equality California | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Fresno Chamber of Commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Gilroy Chamber of Commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Greater Conejo Valley Chamber of Commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Health Access California | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Health Net | ** Support | Jun 26, 2017 |
| Hep B United | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Silicon Valley | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| hollywood chamber of commerce | ** Support | Jun 26, 2017 |
| international alliance of theatrical stage employees, local 80 | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| International Longshore and Warehouse Union | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Irwindale Chamber of Commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| j. glynn and company | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Justice in Aging | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Kaiser Permanente | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| kern county hispanic chamber of commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Latino Coalition for a Healthy California | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| League Of California Cities | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Lifelock, Inc. | * Support | Apr 19, 2017 |
| LIUNA Locals 777 & 792 | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| livermore valley chamber of commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Long Beach Area Chamber of Commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Los Angeles County Professional Peace Officers Association | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Manteca Chamber of Commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Milpitas Chamber of Commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Molina Healthcare | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Montebello Chamber of Commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| National Association Of Social Workers, California Chapter | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| National Health Law Program | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| National Multiple Sclerosis Society - California Action Network | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| National Nurses United | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| NextGen California | * Support | Apr 19, 2017 |
| NextGen Climate | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Oakland Chamber of Commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Orange County Hispanic Chamber of Commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Orange County Professional Firefighters Association, Local 3631 | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Pacific Business Group on Health | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| pajaro valley chamber of commerce and agriculture | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Pasadena Chamber of Commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Personal Assistance Services Council | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Pharmaceutical Research And Manufacturers Of America | ** Against | Sep 12, 2017 |
| PhRMA | * Against | Apr 19, 2017 |
| Plasma Protein Therapeutics Association | ** Against | Sep 12, 2017 |
| professional and technical engineers, ifpte local | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| professional assistance services council | ** Support | Jun 26, 2017 |
| Project Inform | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Redwood City-San Mateo County Chamber Of Commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Regional Chamber of Commerce - San Gabriel Valley | ** Support | Jun 26, 2017 |
| Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| San Gabriel Valley Chamber of Commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| San Gabriel Valley Legislative Coalition Of Chambers | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| San Mateo Area Chamber of Commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| san mateo chamber of commerce | ** Support | Jun 26, 2017 |
| San Ramon Chamber of Commerce | ** Support | Jun 26, 2017 |
| Sanofi | ** Against | Jun 26, 2017 |
| Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Santa Clara County Office Of Education | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| School Employers Association Of California | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Scientists for Wired Technology | * Support | Apr 19, 2017 |
| SEIU California | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Several individuals | ** Support | Jun 26, 2017 |
| silicon valley black chamber of commerce | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Silicon Valley Employers Forum | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Silicon Valley Organization | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Small Business Majority | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Small School Districts Association | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Southwest California Legislative Council | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Tenet Health | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| the black chamber of silicon valley | ** Support | Jun 26, 2017 |
| The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America | * Against | Apr 19, 2017 |
| The Silicon Valley Organization | ** Support | Jun 26, 2017 |
| Union of Health Care Professionals | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Unite Here! | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| United Food and Commercial Workers | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| United Nurses Associations of California | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Utility Workers Union of America | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| western center on law and poverty | ** Support | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Women's Health Specialist of California | * Support | Apr 19, 2017 |
Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | SB |
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Bill No: SB 17
:
SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE: 7-2, 4/19/17
AYES: Hernandez, Atkins, Leyva, Mitchell, Monning, Newman, Roth
NOES: Nguyen, Nielsen
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 5-2, 5/25/17
AYES: Lara, Beall, Bradford, Hill, Wiener
NOES: Bates, Nielsen
SENATE FLOOR: 28-10, 5/30/17
AYES: Allen, Atkins, Beall, Bradford, De León, Dodd, Galgiani, Glazer, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hueso, Jackson, Lara, Leyva, McGuire, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Newman, Pan, Portantino, Roth, Skinner, Stern, Vidak, Wieckowski, Wiener, Wilk
NOES: Anderson, Bates, Berryhill, Fuller, Gaines, Hill, Morrell, Nguyen, Nielsen, Stone
NO VOTE RECORDED: Cannella, Moorlach
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 66-9, 9/11/17 - See last page for vote
SOURCE: California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO
Health Access California
UNITE HERE
DIGEST:
This bill requires health plans and insurers that report rate information through the existing large and small group rate review process to also report specified information related to prescription drug pricing to Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) and California Department of Insurance (CDI). This bill requires DMHC and CDI to compile specified information into a consumer-friendly report that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. This bill requires drug manufacturers to notify specified purchasers, in writing at least 90 days prior to the planned effective date, if it is increasing the wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) of a prescription drug by specified amounts. This bill requires drug manufacturers to notify Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) three days after federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval when introducing a new drug to market at a WAC that exceeds the Medicare Part D specialty drug threshold. This bill requires drug manufacturers to provide specified information to OSHPD related to the drug’s price.
Assembly Amendments:
- Change trigger for drug company notice to purchasers from a tiered approach to 16% over a two year period and exempt drugs with a WAC of $40 or less.
- Specify that drug companies report required information in a format prescribed by OSHPD and delay drug company reporting to OSHPD to January 1, 2019.
- Require the California Research Bureau to report to the Legislature on the implementation of this bill and require implementation of this bill to be reviewed by the Legislature after five years.
- Include a funding mechanism that provides funding derived from health plan assessment and insurance plan assessments.
- Make clarifying and technical amendments and insert legislative intent language.
Existing law:
- Establishes DMHC to regulate health plans and CDI to regulate insurers, including health insurers (referred to as “regulators”).
- Requires health plans and health insurers to file specified rate information with regulators, as applicable, for health plan contracts or health insurance policies in the individual or small group markets and for health plan contracts and health insurance policies in the large group market.
- Requires health plans and health insurers, for the small group and individual markets, to file with regulators, at least 60 days prior to implementing any rate change, specified rate information so that the departments can review the information for unreasonable rate increases.
- Requires, under federal law, drug manufacturers to obtain approval of new drugs from the FDA.
- Establishes the Sherman Law, administered by Department of Public Health (DPH), which, among other things, regulates the packaging, labeling, and advertising of drugs and medical devices in California.
- Prohibits, in the Sherman Law, the sale, delivery, or giving away of any new drug or new device unless it is either:
- A new drug, and a new drug application has been approved for it by the FDA, pursuant to federal law, or it is a new device for which a premarket approval application has been approved, and that approval has not been withdrawn, terminated, or suspended under the FDA; or
- A new drug or new device for which DPH has approved a new drug or device application, and has not withdrawn, terminated, or suspended that approval.
- Requires DPH to adopt regulations to establish the application form and set the fee for licensure and renewal of a drug or device license.
This bill:
Health Plan Reporting
- Requires health plans and insurers that report rate information in the small and large group markets, beginning October 1, 2018, to annually report to regulators the following information about all covered drugs (categorized by generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs):
- The 25 most frequently prescribed drugs;
- The 25 most costly drugs by total annual spending; and,
- The 25 drugs with the highest year-over-year increase in total annual spending.
- Requires regulators to compile this information into a report, to be posted on their Web sites beginning on January 1, 2019, that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. Requires regulators to keep confidential all of the information provided to the department pursuant to 1) above, and requires the information to be protected from public disclosure.
- Requires the data reported by regulators to be aggregated and to not reveal information specific to individual health plans/insurers.
- Requires health plans and insurers, beginning October 1, 2018, to annually report, as part of the large group rate review process, to report the following (categorized by generic drugs, brand name drugs excluding specialty drugs, and specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use):
- The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drug costs for the prior year for each category of prescription drugs;
- The year-over-year increase, as a percentage, in per-member, per-month total health plan spending for each category of prescription drugs;
- The year-over-year increase in per-member, per-month costs for drug prices compared to other components of the health care premium;
- The specialty tier formulary list;
- The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drugs administered in a doctor's office that are covered under the medical benefit as separate from the pharmacy benefit, if available; and,
- Information on its use of a pharmacy benefit manager (PBM), if any, including its name and which components of the prescription drug coverage are managed by the PBM.
- Requires the information reported under these provisions to be included as part of the public meeting that is required as part of the large group rate review process.
Prior Notice of Price Increases for Prescription Drugs
- Requires drug manufacturers to notify state purchasers (CalPERS, Medi-Cal, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and Department of General Services), health plans and insurers, and PBMs at least 90 days prior to the planned effective date, of an increase in the WAC of a prescription drug, as specified.
- Requires a prescription drug manufacturer with a WAC of more than $40 for a course of therapy, as defined, to provide notification, in writing at least 60 days prior to the planned effective date of the WAC increase, to each purchaser specified in 6) above, if the increase in the WAC of a prescription drug is more than 16%, including the proposed increase and the cumulative increases that occurred within the previous two years prior to the current year.
- Requires this notice to include the date of the increase, the current WAC of the drug, and a statement of any changes or improvements to the clinical efficacy of the drug that explain the price increase. If there are no changes or improvements made to the clinical efficacy of the drug subject to the notice, requires the manufacturer to state that.
- Requires a PBM, if it receives a price increase notice, to notify its large contracting purchasers of the increase, as specified.
- Requires drug manufacturers, at the time that the price increase described above takes effect, to report to OSHPD, as specified.
- Requires drug manufacturers, on a quarterly basis, at a time and in a format prescribed by OSHPD, and beginning no later than January 1, 2019, to report to OSHPD all of the following information for each drug for which an increase in WAC is described in 7) above:
- A description of the specific financial and nonfinancial factors used to make the decision to increase the WAC and the amount of the increase, including, but not limited to, an explanation of how these factors justify the increase in the WAC of the drug;
- A schedule of WAC increases for the previous five years if the drug was manufactured by the company;
- If the drug was acquired by the manufacturer within the previous five years, to report to OSHPD all of the following:
- The WAC of the drug at the time of acquisition and in the calendar year prior to acquisition;
- The name of the company from which the drug was acquired, the date acquired, and the purchase price; and,
- The year the drug was introduced to market and the WAC at the time of introduction;
- The patent expiration date of the drug if it is under patent;
- If the drug is a multiple source drug, an innovator multiple source drug, a noninnovator multiple source drug, or a single source drug as defined in federal law;
- A description of the change or improvement in the drug, if any, that necessitates the price increase; and,
- Volume of sales of the drug in the United States for the previous year.
Notice of Introduction of New High-Cost Prescription Drugs
- Requires drug manufacturers to notify OSHPD three days after FDA approval of a new prescription drug to market at a WAC that exceeds the Medicare Part D specialty drug threshold.
- Requires drug manufacturers, no later than 30 days of the notification above, to report to OSHPD all of the following:
- A description of the marketing and pricing plans used in the launch of the new drug in the United States and internationally;
- The estimated volume of patients that may be prescribed the drug;
- Any documentation showing increased efficacy of the drug compared to existing treatments. Requires manufacturers to state if there are no changes or improvements made to the clinical efficacy of the drug subject to the notice;
- If the drug was granted breakthrough therapy designation or priority review by the FDA prior to final approval;
- The expected marketing budget for the drug, including the budget for patient assistance programs; and,
- The date and price of acquisition if the drug was not developed by the manufacturer.
- Allows the manufacturer to limit the information reported in 11) and 12) above, to that which is otherwise in the public domain or publicly available.
- Requires OSHPD to post this information on its Web site on a quarterly basis for price increases and on a monthly basis for new drugs in in a manner that identifies the information on a per-drug basis, and not be aggregated in a manner that would not allow identification of the drug.
- Establishes OSHPD enforcement responsibility in the provisions 11) to 13) above. Establishes a civil penalty of $1,000 per day for every day after the described reporting period that the required information is not reported. Requires a civil penalty to be assessed and recovered in a civil action brought by OSHPD. Permits OSHPD, upon request by a manufacturer, to review assessment of a civil penalty, and reduce or waive for good cause. Requires any money received by OSHPD be paid into the Managed Care Fund.
- Requires funding for the actual and necessary expenses of OSHPD to conduct the specified activities described above to be provided, subject to appropriation by the Legislature, from the transfers of moneys from the Managed Care Fund and Insurance Fund.
- Requires the share of funding from the Managed Care Fund to be based on the number of covered lives under plans regulated by the DMHC, including covered lives under the Medi-Cal managed care, as determined by DMHC, in proportion to the total number of all covered lives in this state. Requires the share of funding from the Insurance Fund to be based on the number of covered lives that are covered under health insurance policies and benefit plans regulated by CDI, including covered lives under Medicare supplement plans, as determined by CDI, in proportion to the total number of all covered lives in the state.
- Allows OSHPD to adopt regulations or issue guidance for the implementation of the above. Requires all information to be reported to OSHPD to be reported in a form as prescribed by OSPHD, beginning in the first calendar quarter of 2019. Allows OSHPD to consult with DMHC, CDI, the California State Board of Pharmacy, and any state purchaser.
- Requires the California Research Bureau, by January 1, 2022, to report to the Legislature on this bill's implementation, including, but limited to, this bill's effectiveness in addressing the following goals:
- Promoting transparency in pharmaceutical pricing for the state and other payers;
- Enhancing understanding about pharmaceutical spending trends; and,
- Assisting the state and other payers in management of pharmaceutical drug costs.
- Requires the report in above to be submitted in compliance with existing law related to reports to the Legislature and subject to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature.
- Finds and declares that that it is necessary for the Legislature to limit the public's right to information in order to protect proprietary, confidential information regarding health plan and insurer prescription drug utilization and spending information that is specific to a health plan or insurer to protect the integrity of the competitive market.
Comments
Author’s statement. The introduction of new and innovative drugs is vital to our health care system, but these often high-priced treatments come with a multitude of challenges. Expensive drugs and steady price increases are becoming common-place with little transparency for astounding prices. This high-priced trend is a costly burden for patients, state programs, employers, and other payers, making it crucial that we understand what’s behind the exploding prices. The public and policymakers need greater insight that will allow us to identify strategies to ensure prices do not threaten access to life-saving treatments. Additionally, data suggest that publically accessible price information in other sectors of the health care market encourage providers to offer more competitive pricing and thereby reduce excess health spending. Transparency-focused policies in this state have led to rules requiring hospitals in California to provide information on pricing for common surgeries, health plans to submit detailed data regarding premium changes, and doctors to report more information to the federal government. But somehow, drug makers have been granted an exception to this forward-thinking trend. This bill will bring prescription drugs in line with the rest of the health care sector by shining a light on drugs that are having the greatest impact on our health care dollar. This change is absolutely necessary in an environment where consumer spending on prescription drugs increased by a staggering $65 billion from 2012 to 2015, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. These are drugs that treat diseases that impact millions of Americans, including hundreds of thousands of patients in public programs like Medi-Cal, and we have the right to know why they cost so much.
NOTE: See the Senate Health Committee analysis of this bill for more detailed background of this bill.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: Fiscal Com.: Local:
According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, unknown, likely minor impact on hospice agency licensing and enforcement by DPH (Licensing and Certification Fund). Any additional costs to process increased complaints or additional licenses would be supported through an existing fee, which may be readjusted annually. The 2017-18 licensure fee for a hospice is slightly less than $3,000.
California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO (co-source)
Health Access California (co-source)
UNITE HERE! (co-source)
AARP
AFSCME, AFL-CIO
America’s Health Insurance Plans
American Academy of Pediatrics
Anthem Blue Cross
APLA Health
Asian Law Alliance
Asian Pacific Health Foundation
Association of California Life and Health Insurance Companies
Blue Shield of California
California Academy of Family Physicians
California Alliance for Retired Americans
California Association of Health Plans
California Association of Health Underwriters
California Black Health Network
California Conference Board of the Amalgamated Transit Union
California Conference of Machinists
California Democratic Party
California Hospital Association
California IATSE Council
California Immigrant Policy Center
California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO
California LGBT Health and Human Services Network
California Medical Association
California Nurses Association/National Nurses United
California Optometric Association
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network
California Physicians Alliance
California Professional Firefighters
California Retired Teachers Association
California School Employees Association
California State Retirees
California Teachers Association
California Teamsters Public Affairs Council
CalPERS
CALPIRG
Carson Chamber of Commerce
Children NOW
City and County of San Francisco
Clovis Chamber of Commerce
Community Medical Centers of Fresno
Congress of California Seniors
Consumer Federation of California
Consumers Union
Courage Campaign
Cupertino Chamber of Commerce
Engineers and Scientists of California, IFPTE Local 20
Epilepsy California
Equality California
Fresno Chamber of Commerce
Gilroy Chamber of Commerce
Greater Conejo Valley Chamber of Commerce
Hep B United
Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Silicon Valley
International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Local 80
International Longshore and Warehouse Union
Irwindale Chamber of Commerce
J. Glynn and Company
Justice in Aging
Kaiser Permanente
Kern County Hispanic Chamber of Commerce
Latino Coalition for a Healthy California
League of California Cities
LIUNA Locals 777 & 792
Livermore Valley Chamber of Commerce
Long Beach Area Chamber of Commerce
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce
Los Angeles County Professional Peace Officers Association
Manteca Chamber of Commerce
Milpitas Chamber of Commerce
Molina Healthcare
Montebello Chamber of Commerce
National Association of Social Workers, California Chapter
National Health Law Program
National Multiple Sclerosis Society – California Action Network
NextGen Climate
Oakland Chamber of Commerce
Orange County Hispanic Chamber of Commerce
Orange County Professional Firefighters Association, Local 3631
Pacific Business Group on Health
Pajaro Valley Chamber of Commerce and Agriculture
Pasadena Chamber of Commerce
Personal Assistance Services Council
Professional and Technical Engineers, IFPTE Local
Project Inform
Redwood City-San Mateo County Chamber of Commerce
Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce
San Francisco Culinary, Bartenders and Service Employees Welfare Fund
San Gabriel Valley Chamber of Commerce
San Gabriel Valley Legislative Coalition of Chambers
San Mateo Area Chamber of Commerce
Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors
Santa Clara County Office of Education
School Employers Association of California
SEIU California
Silicon Valley Black Chamber of Commerce
Silicon Valley Employers Forum
Silicon Valley Organization
Small Business Majority
Small School Districts Association
Southwest California Legislative Council
Tenet Health
UNITE HERE!
United Food and Commercial Workers
United Nurses Associations of California/Union of Health Care Professionals
Utility Workers Union of America
Western Center on Law and Poverty
OPPOSITION: (Verified 9/11/17)
Association for Accessible Medicines
Biocom
Biotechnology Innovation Organization
California Life Sciences Association
Eli Lilly & Company
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
Plasma Protein Therapeutics Association
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 66-9, 9/11/17
AYES: Acosta, Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Baker, Berman, Bloom, Bocanegra, Bonta, Burke, Caballero, Calderon, Cervantes, Chau, Chen, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Cunningham, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Eggman, Frazier, Friedman, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gloria, Gonzalez Fletcher, Gray, Grayson, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Lackey, Levine, Limón, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, O'Donnell, Patterson, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Reyes, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Rubio, Salas, Santiago, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Waldron, Weber, Wood, Rendon
NOES: Travis Allen, Bigelow, Chávez, Flora, Fong, Harper, Kiley, Obernolte, Steinorth
NO VOTE RECORDED: Brough, Choi, Mayes, Voepel
9/12/17 21:23:19
**** END ****
SENATE THIRD READING
STR Bill Id:SB 17
Author:(Hernandez)
As Amended Ver:September 5, 2017
Majority vote
SENATE VOTE: 28-10
Committee | Votes | Ayes | Noes |
Health | 11-0 | Wood, Bonta, Kalra, Limón, McCarty, Nazarian, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Santiago, Thurmond, Chau | |
Appropriations | 12-3 | Gonzalez Fletcher, Bloom, Bocanegra, Bonta, Calderon, Chau, Eggman, Friedman, Gallagher, Eduardo Garcia, Jones-Sawyer, Reyes | Brough, Fong, Obernolte |
SUMMARY: Requires health care service plans (health plans) and health insurers that report rate information through the existing rate review process to also report information related to covered prescription drugs, as specified, to the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) or California Department of Insurance (CDI), respectively. Requires DMHC and CDI to compile the data reported by health plans and insurers into a report that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. Requires drug manufacturers to notify specified state purchasers, health plans, and health insurers, in writing at least 60 days prior to the planned effective date, if it is increasing the wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) of a prescription drug by specified amounts. Requires drug manufacturers to notify the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) within three days of commercial availability if it is introducing a new prescription drug to market at a WAC that exceeds the Medicare Part D specialty drug threshold. Requires drug manufacturers to provide specified information to OSHPD related to the drug's price. Specifically, this bill:
Rate Reporting Information
- Requires health plans to report to DMHC and insurers to report to CDI on an annual basis, rate information through existing group and individual rate review processes, beginning October 1, 2018, the following information about all covered drugs, including generic, brand name, and specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use:
- The 25 most frequently prescribed drugs;
- The 25 most costly drugs by total annual spending; and,
- The 25 drugs with the highest year-over-year increase in total annual spending.
- Requires DMHC and CDI to compile the data in 1) above into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. Requires the data in the report to be aggregated and prohibits information specific to individual health plans and insurers.
- Defines a specialty drug as one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program.
- Requires DMHC and CDI to publish on its Internet Web site the report in 2) above by January 1 of each year, beginning on January 1, 2019.
- Requires the information provided to DMHC and CDI, except for the report in 2) above, to remain confidential and protected from public disclosure.
- Requires health plans and insurers, beginning October 1, 2018, to annually report, as part of the existing large group rate review process, the following information:
- Enrollee cost sharing, including cost sharing for prescription drugs as a factor affecting base rate described in existing law;
- For covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, excluding specialty generic drugs, brand name drugs excluding specialty drugs, and brand name and generic specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following:
- The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drug costs for the prior year for each category of prescription drugs;
- The year-over-year increase, as a percentage, in total spending for each category of prescription drugs;
- The year-over-year increase in per-member, per-month costs for drug prices compared to other components of the health care premium;
- The specialty tier formulary list;
- The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drugs administered in a doctor's office that are covered under the medical benefit as separate from the pharmacy benefit, if available; and,
- Information on its use of a pharmacy benefit manager (PBM), if any, including its name and which components of the prescription drug coverage described in b) above are managed by the PBM.
- Revises existing large group rate review process to require the DMHC and CDI to conduct an annual public meeting regarding large group rates within four months (rather than three months in existing law) of posting the aggregate information described above and in existing law.
Fees
Prohibits the amounts raised by the collection of special fees from specified health facilities established in existing law from being used for programs administered by OSHPD pursuant to this bill.
Prescription Drug Pricing for Purchasers
- Applies all of the provisions below to any manufacturer of a prescription drug that is purchased or reimbursed by state purchasers, including, but not limited to the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), Department of General Services, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, or any entity acting on behalf of the state, health plans and insurers, and PBMs, as defined.
- Requires a prescription drug manufacturer with a WAC of more than forty dollars for a course of therapy to provide notification, in writing at least 60 days prior to the planned effective date of the WAC increase, to each purchaser specified in 8) above, if the increase in the WAC of a prescription drug is more than 16%, including the proposed increase and the cumulative increases that occurred within the previous two years prior to the current year.
- Defines course of therapy as either of the following:
- The recommended daily dosage units of a prescription drug pursuant to its prescribing label as approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for 30 days; or,
- The recommended daily dosage units of a prescription drug pursuant to its prescribing label as approved by the FDA for a normal course of treatment that is less than 30 days.
- Requires notice in 9) above, to include the date of the increase, the current WAC of the prescription drug, and the dollar amount of the future increase in the WAC of the prescription drug. Also requires the notice to include a statement regarding whether a change or improvement in the drug necessitates the price increase, and if so, requires the manufacturer to describe the change or improvement.
- Requires a prescription drug manufacturer to provide notice in 9) above, to each specified state purchasers and other specified purchasers if the purchaser registers with OSHPD for the purpose of this notification. Requires OSHPD to make available to manufacturers a list of registered purchases for the purpose of this notification.
- Requires a PBM, if it receives a price increase notice, to notify its large contracting purchasers of the increase. Defines large purchasers as a purchaser that provides coverage to more than 500 covered lives.
- Requires drug manufacturers, on a quarterly basis, at a time and in a format prescribed by OSHPD, and beginning no later than January 1, 2019, to report to OSHPD all of the following information for each drug for which an increase in WAC is described in 9) above:
- A description of the specific financial and nonfinancial factors used to make the decision to increase the WAC and the amount of the increase, including, but not limited to, an explanation of how these factors justify the increase in the WAC of the drug;
- A schedule of WAC increases for the previous five years if the drug was manufactured by the company;
- If the drug was acquired by the manufacturer within the previous five years, to report to OSHPD all of the following:
- The WAC of the drug at the time of acquisition and in the calendar year prior to acquisition;
- The name of the company from which the drug was acquired, the date acquired, and the purchase price; and,
- The year the drug was introduced to market and the WAC at the time of introduction;
- The patent expiration date of the drug if it is under patent;
- If the drug is a multiple source drug, an innovator multiple source drug, a noninnovator multiple source drug, or a single source drug as defined in federal law;
- A description of the change or improvement in the drug, if any, that necessitates the price increase; and,
- Volume of sales of the drug in the United States for the previous year.
- Requires drug manufacturers to notify OSHPD in writing three days after the release of the drug in the commercial market if it is introducing a new prescription drug to market at a WAC that exceeds the threshold set for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program. Allows a drug manufacturer to make this notification pending approval by the FDA, if commercial availability is expected within three days of approval.
- Requires drug manufacturers, no later than 30 days of the notification above, to report to OSHPD, in a format prescribed by OSHPD, all of the following:
- A description of the marketing and pricing plans used in the launch of the new drug in the United States and internationally;
- The estimated volume of patients that may be prescribed the drug;
- If the drug was granted breakthrough therapy designation or priority review by the FDA prior to final approval; and,
- The date and price of acquisition if the drug was not developed by the manufacturer.
- Allows the manufacturer to limit the information reported in 14) and 16) above, to that which is otherwise in the public domain or publicly available.
- Requires OSHPD to post information on its Internet Web site on a quarterly basis for price increases and within 60 days of receipt from a manufacturer; and on a quarterly basis for new drugs. Requires OSHPD to post information in a manner that identifies the information on a per-drug basis, and not be aggregated in a manner that would not allow identification of the drug.
- Establishes OSHPD enforcement responsibility in the provisions 14) to 17) above. Establishes a civil penalty of $1,000 per day for every day after the described reporting period that the required information is not reported. Requires a civil penalty to be assessed and recovered in a civil action brought by OSHPD. Permits OSHPD, upon request by a manufacturer, to review assessment of a civil penalty, and reduce or waive for good cause. Requires any money received by OSHPD be paid into the Managed Care Fund.
- Requires funding for the actual and necessary expenses of OSHPD to conduct the specified activities described above to be provided, subject to appropriation by the Legislature, from the transfers of moneys from the Managed Care Fund and Insurance Fund.
- Requires the share of funding from the Managed Care Fund to be based on the number of covered lives under plans regulated by the DMHC, including covered lives under the Medi-Cal managed care, as determined by DMHC, in proportion to the total number of all covered lives in this state. Requires the share of funding from the Insurance Fund to be based on the number of covered lives that are covered under health insurance policies and benefit plans regulated by CDI, including covered lives under Medicare supplement plans, as determined by CDI, in proportion to the total number of all covered lives in the state.
- Allows OSHPD to adopt regulations or issue guidance for the implementation of the above. Requires all information to be reported to OSHPD to be reported in a form as prescribed by OSPHD, beginning in the first calendar quarter of 2019. Allows OSHPD to consult with DMHC, CDI, the California State Board of Pharmacy, and any state purchaser.
- Requires the California Research Bureau, by January 1, 2022, to report to the Legislature on this bill's implementation, including, but limited to, this bill's effectiveness in addressing the following goals:
- Promoting transparency in pharmaceutical pricing for the state and other payers;
- Enhancing understanding about pharmaceutical spending trends; and,
- Assisting the state and other payers in management of pharmaceutical drug costs.
- Requires the report in 23) above to be submitted in compliance with existing law related to reports to the Legislature and subject to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature. Sunsets 23) above on January 1, 2024.
- Finds and declares that that it is necessary for the Legislature to limit the public's right to information in order to protect proprietary, confidential information regarding health plan and insurer prescription drug utilization and spending information that is specific to a health plan or insurer to protect the integrity of the competitive market.
FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee:
- Costs to the DMHC in the range of $200,000 in 2017-18, $370,000 in 2018-19, and $350,000 ongoing to review, compile, and report on new rate filing information (Managed Care Fund).
- Minor costs to CDI, not likely to exceed $15,000 ongoing, to review, compile, and report on new rate filing information (Insurance Fund).
- Costs to enforce the reporting requirement and collect, coordinate, and publish information by OSHPD (Managed Care Fund and Insurance Fund) estimated at $550,000 in 2018-19, $900,000 in 2019-20 and 2020-21, and $850,000 ongoing.
- Unknown potential Managed Care Fund penalty revenues, based on enforcement and levels of noncompliance.
- Costs to the California Research Bureau are likely to be absorbable.
COMMENTS: According to the author, the introduction of new and innovative drugs is vital to our health care system, but these often high-priced treatments come with a multitude of challenges. Expensive drugs and steady price increases are becoming common-place with little transparency for astounding prices. This high-priced trend is a costly burden for patients, state programs, employers, and other payers, making it crucial that we understand what's behind the exploding prices. The public and policymakers need greater insight that will allow us to identify strategies to ensure prices do not threaten access to life-saving treatments. Additionally, data suggest that publicly accessible price information in other sectors of the health care market encourages providers to offer more competitive pricing and thereby reduce excess health spending.
Transparency-focused policies in this state have led to rules requiring hospitals in California to provide information on pricing for common surgeries, health plans to submit detailed data regarding premium changes, and doctors to report more information to the federal government. But somehow, drug makers have been granted an exception to this forward-thinking trend. This bill will bring prescription drugs in line with the rest of the health care sector by shining a light on drugs that are having the greatest impact on our health care dollar. This change is absolutely necessary in an environment where consumer spending on prescription drugs increased by a staggering $65 billion from 2012 to 2015, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. These are drugs that treat diseases that impact millions of Americans, including hundreds of thousands of patients in public programs like Medi-Cal, and we have the right to know why they cost so much.
- Health spending on prescription drugs. A study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in August 2016 reported that almost a quarter of 648 respondents to a 2015 poll reported that they or another family member did not fill a prescription in the last year because of cost. Data on national health expenditures reveal a similar pattern of rising costs. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) forecast summary indicates that for 2015-25, health spending is projected to grow at an average rate of 5.8% per year (4.8% on a per capita basis), which is 1.3% faster than the growth in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per year over this period. As a result, the health share of GDP is expected to rise from 17.5% in 2014 to 20.1% by 2025. Growth in health spending is expected to respond to changes in economic growth, faster growth in medical prices, and population aging. By the end of the projection, federal, state, and local governments are projected to finance 47% of national health spending (from 45% in 2014). With respect to prescription drugs, spending is projected to have grown 8.1% in 2015 and to have reached $321.9 billion, after a growth of 12.2% in 2014. CMS points out that this somewhat slower, but still relatively strong growth, is a result of the continued impact of newly approved and expensive drugs to treat conditions such as the hepatitis C virus (HCV) and cancer. Prescription drug spending is projected to grow an average of 6.7% per year for 2016 through 2025 as the influence on spending from newly approved drugs is expected to fade after two years of above average impacts. The point at which drug spending growth is projected to peak during the 10 year period is 2018; relatively fewer brand-name drugs are expected to lose patent protection and thus downward price pressure typically associated with the introduction of generic substitutes is somewhat mitigated.
- Prescription drug pricing. According to the JAMA article, the primary reason for increasing drug spending is the high price of branded products protected by market exclusivity provisions granted by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the FDA. The JAMA article reported that although brand-name drugs comprise only 10% of all dispensed prescriptions in the U.S., they account for 72% of drug spending. The JAMA article also stated that high prices have historically been limited to brand-name drugs that treat rare conditions, however, drugs that treat conditions affecting millions of individuals in the U.S. now also have high costs, for example many of the new oncology drugs. The JAMA article also stated that although brand-name drugs account for the greatest increase in prescription drug expenditures, another area that has captured the attention of the public and of policy makers is the sharp increase in the costs of some older generic drugs.
Due to the complexity and length of time invested in research, it is difficult for analysts and researchers to assess exactly how much it costs to bring one drug to market. The timeframe of development can last for decades, and may be a combination of efforts from multiple companies or previous research on other drugs. Beyond research and development costs, there are other business factors that manufacturers will take into account when determining the list price of a drug, including but not limited to marketing, sales, advertising, information technology, legal defense, and the cost of raw materials. A June 2016 California HealthCare Foundation's Issue Brief contended that as a consequence of government benefits and restrictions, the favorable pricing for the Veterans Administration and Medicaid set the floor for the lowest prices that other purchasers may try to negotiate. Confounding this issue is the nondisclosure of net drug prices; purchasers have no method to calibrate the comparative value of the drugs they are purchasing since contracts remain confidential. Consequently, purchasers are prevented from comparison shopping net prices. The JAMA article also discussed the role of public and private payers during a drug's exclusivity period and the negotiating power of the payer as the primary counterweight against excessive pricing.
- State spending. Typically, the state pays for prescription drugs under programs that provide health care or health insurance to certain state populations. For example, the state pays for prescription drugs through the health care coverage it provides to the state's low-income residents through the Medi-Cal program and to current and retired state employees through CalPERS.
In 2015-16, Medi-Cal spent over $3.7 billion on outpatient prescription drugs, which represents 4.2% of the DHCS $87 billion 2015-16 Budget. The Governor's 2017-18 Budget estimates that pharmacy fee-for-service spending (including prescribed drugs, medical supplies, and durable medical equipment) will be over $3.89 billion or 3.6% of the DHCS $102.6 billion Medi-Cal budget. These amounts do not include expenditures on prescription drugs made by Medi-Cal managed care plans.
In its 2015 Legislative Report, CalPERS described pharmacy trends and projected costs contributing significantly to the overall rates for the 2016 plan year. As a percentage of the overall rate increases for both the HMO and PPOs, about 45% is attributed to pharmacy; approximately 20% of the total pharmacy spending was attributable to each carrier's top 10 drugs. The balance is attributed to medical expenses, federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act fees, and administrative fees. Additionally, a September 2016 presentation to the CalPERS Board of Administration entitled, "Prescription Drugs Utilization and Cost Trends," included an analysis of claims data demonstrating that costs for prescription drugs continue to rise. The 2015 total prescription drug costs for drugs obtained through mail-order and at retail pharmacies for all CalPERS plans were $2.1 billion, which represented nearly a 10% increase over the costs of $1.9 billion in 2014. The top 10 non-specialty drugs accounted for $213 million spending or 14% of the total non-specialty drug cost in 2015.
- Assembly Health Informational Hearing. In an effort to understand the factors that lead to unexpected drug price increases and offer meaningful solutions that assure patient access while controlling costs, this Committee held a series of informational hearings on prescription drug pricing. The first informational hearing entitled, "Understanding the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain: What is Driving Up the Cost of Drugs," was held on October 31, 2016, and provided a historical perspective on drug pricing, discussed the economics of drug pricing, and included an overview of the pharmaceutical supply chain. The second hearing entitled, "Impact of Rising Drug Costs on Public and Private Payers," focused on the impact of prescription drug costs to public and private payers and how this influences the total cost of health care delivery in California. The hearing explored how the public and private sectors obtain prescription drugs, discuss trends in drug pricing, develop formularies, and various steps that payers are utilizing to address the escalating prices of prescriptions drugs.
- Other states. Other states have enacted legislation to address concerns relating to high prescription drug spending. For example, Vermont enacted legislation that requires state officials to identify 15 drugs for which "significant health care dollars" are spent, and where WAC rose by 50% or more over the previous five-year period. Alternatively, they must identify list prices for 15 medicines that rose 15% or more over a 12-month period. Afterwards, the state attorney general must contact each drug maker to obtain justification for price hikes. The companies must submit information concerning all factors that contributed to the price increases, including detailed cost breakdowns. Ultimately, this information is collected in a report and posted on a public Internet Web site. Each violation carries a $10,000 penalty. The Vermont law requires state officials to identify 15 drugs for which "significant health care dollars" are spent, and where list prices rose by 50% or more over the previous five-year period. Alternatively, they must identify list prices for 15 medicines that rose 15% or more over a 12-month period. Maryland became the first state to enact legislation that outlaws "price gouging" in the generic drug market. Maryland's law, enacted on May 27, 2017, has two components: i) a prohibition on price gouging; and, ii) a mechanism for reporting, investigating, and penalizing price gouging in the state's Medicaid program. Lastly, Nevada signed into law legislation requiring pharmaceutical companies to release insulin prices. The Nevada law mandates pharmaceutical companies to disclose how they set insulin prices, manufacturing costs, research investments and projects annually.
Analysis Prepared by: Kristene Mapile / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097 0001912
Date of Hearing: August 23, 2017
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher, Chair
SBPCA Bill Id:SB 17
Author:(Hernandez) – As Amended Ver:July 20, 2017
Policy Committee: | Health | Vote: | 11 - 0 |
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY:
This bill establishes disclosure on prescription drug spending, a 60-day prior notification for prescription drug price increases that meet a certain threshold, and reporting to the state on prescription drug price information. Specifically, this bill:
Health Plan/Insurer Disclosure on Drug Spending
- Requires health plans and insurers to report confidentially to Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) and California Department of Insurance (CDI) on prescription drug spending, including the most frequently prescribed drugs, the most costly drugs, and the drugs with the highest year-over-year increase in spending.
- Requires the DMHC and CDI to compile this information in an annual public report that demonstrates the impact of drug costs to health care premiums.
- Adds, to existing rate information reported to DMHC and CDI, information about the contribution of prescription drugs to overall health spending, the percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drugs administered in a doctor’s office that are covered under the medical benefit, and the plans' use of a pharmaceutical benefit manager (PBM).
Drug Pricing Purchaser Notification and Reporting
- Applies notification and reporting requirements to any manufacturer of a prescription drug that is purchased by or reimbursed by a health plan, a health insurer, PBM, or a state purchaser in California, as specified.
- Requires a prescription drug manufacturer to provide written notification, 60 days prior to a planned price increase of a drug with a wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) of $40 or more for a 30-day supply, to each state purchaser, health plan or insurer, and PBM, if the cumulative increase (including the proposed increase and any other increases over the prior two calendar years) is more than 10%.
- Requires the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development to maintain and provide a list of registered purchasers, for purposes of the advance pricing notification.
- Requires a pharmacy benefit manager to notify its contracted large public and private purchasers of a price increase notification.
- Requires manufacturers to report to OSHPD quarterly, and OSHPD to publicly report in turn, information including specific factors used to make a decision on a price increase, an explanation of how these factors relate to the price increase, drug marketing budgets, information about drug acquisitions, sales volume, and other information, and allows information to be limited to what is in the public domain.
- Requires manufacturers to notify OSHPD in writing if it is introducing a new prescription drug to market at a WAC that exceeds the threshold set for a specialty drug under Medicare Part D within three days of the release of the drug into the commercial market, and requires manufacturers to report specified related information, including marketing and pricing plans, estimated patient volume, and other information, and allows information to be limited to what is in the public domain.
- Requires OSHPD to assess a civil penalty of $1,000 per day for every day after the applicable notification period, for failure to report required information, allows a review on appeal, and allows the penalty to be waived or reduced for good cause.
- Allows OSHPD to issue regulations.
FISCAL EFFECT:
- Costs to the DMHC in the range of $200,000 in 2017-18, $370,00 in 2018-19, and $350,000 ongoing to review, compile, and report on new rate filing information (Managed Care Fund).
- Minor costs to CDI, not likely to exceed $15,000 ongoing, to review, compile, and report on new rate filing information (Insurance Fund).
- Costs to enforce the reporting requirement and collect, coordinate, and publish information by the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (California Health Data and Planning Fund) estimated at $550,000 in 2018-19, $1.3 million in 2019-20 and 2020-21, and $1 million ongoing.
- Unknown potential GF penalty revenues, based on enforcement and levels of noncompliance.
COMMENTS:
- Purpose. According to the author, the introduction of new and innovative drugs is vital to our health care system, but these often high-priced treatments come with a multitude of challenges. The author contends high-priced drugs are a costly burden for patients, state programs, employers, and other payers, and that the public and policymakers need greater insight that will allow us to identify strategies to ensure prices do not threaten access to life-saving treatments.
- Drug Spending and Prices. Prescription drug spending is estimated to account for around 10% of overall health care costs, yet spending has been growing rapidly. Public and policymaker interest in addressing high and growing costs has been piqued in recent years both by the introduction of new, innovative drugs at spectacular prices, such as the $84,000 breakthrough Hepatitis C drug Sovaldi, as well as opportunistic price increases of generic drugs, such as a 5,000% price increase in a decades-old drug called Daraprim.
When developed, single-source drugs can be sold during a period of market exclusivity in order to reward innovation. After a drug loses its patent protection, it is considered a generic drug, and it may be manufactured by more than one company. Pricing and spending concerns in both the single-source and the more competitive generic market have been noted. In the single-source market, the main issues are the high and increasing cost of new "specialty" drugs, and steadily increasing growth in overall costs that exceed the growth rate in other market segments. In the generic market, overall price trends are generally downward, but there are concerns about consolidation, short-term market manipulation, and exploitation that lead to seemingly arbitrary, excessive price spikes.
There is a high level of government intervention in the pharmaceutical market. Through state and federal laws, the government limits competition through patent protection, restricts the provision of drugs to those approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and prescribed by licensed professionals, finances drugs through government programs and subsidies, licenses manufacturers and pharmacies, requires tracking of drugs through the supply chain, requires medically necessary drugs to be provided by health plans and insurance, and caps the patient cost share for prescription drugs.
The prescription drug supply chain— how drugs physically get from manufacturers to patients— is quite complicated and has many intermediate players with different roles, including wholesalers, distributors, pharmacies, and health care providers. There are also a number of entities involved in negotiating the terms and prices under which drugs will be supplied—manufacturers may negotiate terms with payers like government agencies, labor trusts, and employers; purchasers like health plans and insurers; and in some cases, subcontractors like PBMs that manage drug benefits on behalf of numerous payers and purchasers.
Outpatient prescription drug coverage is a required benefit in the individual and small-group market under the federal Affordable Care Act, and is also provided by most large employer plans and through government health care programs. Under current law, health plans and PBMs attempt to meet patient needs for medication in a way that minimizes drug costs through negotiations with manufacturers, while meeting clinical standards of appropriate care. Formularies and different patient cost-sharing levels are used to drive utilization toward lower-cost drugs where possible.
Finally, entities concerned about increasing drug prices also recognize some level of pharmaceutical profits are invested in research and development that creates a pipeline of new, beneficial drugs that may be lifesaving or improve quality of life for consumers. It is generally recognized that the development costs and failure rates for new drugs are high. Also, in some cases, prescription drugs can substitute for more costly health care services, potentially offering a good value for the improvements they offer for a patient's health status, in spite of high sticker prices.
- Approach of this bill. This bill attempts to help purchasers understand and plan for specific price increases by requiring advanced disclosure. It also requires reporting that will assist the state to track pricing factors and trends, and to analyze the impact of prescription drug spending more broadly.
- Support. This bill has support from numerous payers and purchasers, including labor groups and trusts, health plans and insurers, business groups, PBMs, and CalPERS. Health care providers and health consumer advocates also support this bill. California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO (CLF) and Health Access California are cosponsors of this bill, who maintain notice and disclosure are important tools to provide transparency in health care and there is a strong public policy interest to get basic information on prescription drug prices. A labor trust, the San Francisco Culinary, Bartenders, and Service Employees Welfare Fund, explains the advance price notification will help their trust fund to do the following: make changes to formularies; find alternatives to costly drugs; hold third-party purchasers accountable for prices and rebates; negotiate larger rebates and discounts; and prevent unnecessarily high payment for drugs, such as those with short-term price hikes where an alternative formulation can achieve the same result; and budget for price increases.
- Opposition. Drug manufacturers oppose this bill, contending the reporting is burdensome and harmful to business interests. Member companies of the California Life Sciences Association (CLSA), the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO), and Biocom write it will undermine investment in small and emerging biotechnology firms and that it will disrupt competitive market dynamics. In a joint letter the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), BIO, CSLA, and Biocom note concern about the high volume of reports and the potential administrative burden on OSHPD. They also note the bill requires the disclosure of commercially sensitive pricing information will undermine market competition, and suggest providing this information without confidentiality protections poses significant concerns about stockpiling and limited access, FDA regulation of manufacturer communications, and antitrust issues.
- Related Legislation.
SB 790 (McGuire) prohibits a drug manufacturer or a wholesaler from offering or giving a gift, as defined, to a health care provider. SB 790 is pending on the Assembly Floor.
AB 265 (Wood) prohibits drug manufacturers from offering discounts or other reductions in an individual's out-of-pocket expenses associated with his or her insurance coverage, if a lower-cost therapeutically equivalent generic drug is available. AB 265 is pending on the Senate Floor.
AB 315 (Wood) requires PBMs to be licensed by DMHC and requires a PBM to disclose to a purchaser certain information. AB 315 is pending in the Senate Appropriations Committee.
- Prior Legislation.
SB 1010 (Hernández), of the 2015-16 Legislative Session, was similar to this bill and was placed on the Assembly Floor Inactive File.
AB 2436 (Roger Hernández), of the 2015-16 Legislative Session, required carriers to provide at the time that a prescription drug is delivered or within 30 days of purchase, specified information related to the cost of the prescription drug. AB 2436 died on the Assembly Floor.
AB 463 (Chiu), of the 2015-16 Legislative Session, required pharmaceutical companies to file an annual report with OSHPD containing specified information regarding the development and pricing of prescription drugs. The Assembly Health Committee hearing was canceled at the request of the author.
AB 339 (Gordon), Chapter 619, Statutes of 2015, contains a variety of requirements about formularies and access to prescription drugs, and caps copayments for most health plans at $250 for a supply of up to 30 days for an individual prescription, as specified.
Analysis Prepared by: Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916) 319-2081
Date of Hearing: June 27, 2017
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HEALTH
Jim Wood, Chair
SBPCA Bill Id:SB 17
Author:(Hernandez) – As Amended Ver:April 25, 2017
SENATE VOTE: 28-10
SUBJECT: Health care: prescription drug costs.
SUMMARY: Requires health care service plans (health plans) and health insurers that report rate information through the existing rate review process to also report information related to covered prescription drugs, as specified, to the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) or California Department of Insurance (CDI), respectively. Requires DMHC and CDI to compile the data reported by health plans and insurers into a report that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. Requires drug manufacturers to notify specified state purchasers, health plans, and health insurers, in writing at least 90 days prior to the planned effective date, if it is increasing the wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) of a prescription drug by specified amounts. Requires drug manufacturers to notify the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) within three days of commercial availability if it is introducing a new prescription drug to market at a WAC that exceeds the Medicare Part D specialty drug threshold. Requires drug manufacturers to provide specified information to OSHPD related to the drug’s price. Specifically, this bill:
Rate Reporting Information
- Requires health plans to report to DMHC and insurers to report to CDI on an annual basis, rate information through existing group and individual rate review processes, beginning October 1, 2018, the following information about all covered drugs, including generic, brand name, and specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use:
- The 25 most frequently prescribed drugs;
- The 25 most costly drugs by total annual spending; and,
- The 25 drugs with the highest year-over-year increase in total annual spending.
- Requires the DMHC and CDI to compile the data in 1) above into a report for to public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. Requires the data in the report to be aggregated and prohibits information specific to individual health plans and insurers.
- Defines a specialty drug as one that exceeds the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program.
- Requires DMHC and CDI to publish on its Internet Website the report in 2) above by January 1 of each year, beginning on January 1, 2019.
- Requires the information provided to DMHC and CDI, except for the report in 2) above, to remain confidential and protected from public disclosure.
- Requires health plans and insurers, beginning October 1, 2018, to annually report, as part of the existing large group rate review process, the following information:
- Enrollee cost sharing, including cost sharing for prescription drugs as a factor affecting base rate described in existing law;
- For covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, excluding specialty generic drugs, brand name drugs excluding specialty drugs, and brand name and generic specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use, all of the following:
- The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drug costs for the prior year for each category of prescription drugs;
- The year-over-year increase, as a percentage, in total spending for each category of prescription drugs;
- The year-over-year increase in per-member, per-month costs for drug prices compared to other components of the health care premium;
- The specialty tier formulary list;
- The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drugs administered in a doctor's office that are covered under the medical benefit as separate from the pharmacy benefit, if available; and,
- Information on its use of a pharmacy benefit manager (PBM), if any, including its name and which components of the prescription drug coverage described in b) above are managed by the PBM.
Prescription Drug Pricing for Purchasers
- Applies all of the provisions below to any manufacturer of a prescription drug that is purchased or reimbursed by state purchasers, including, but not limited to the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), Department of General Services, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, or any entity acting on behalf of the state, health plans and insurers, and PBMs, as defined.
- Requires a prescription drug manufacturer to provide notification, in writing at least 90 days prior to the planned effective date of the WAC increase, to each purchaser specified in 7) above if any of the following apply:
- The WAC is under the Medicare Part D specialty drug threshold and if the cumulative increase is more than 25% over the three calendar years prior to the current year; or,
- The WAC is above the Medicare Part D specialty drug threshold and if the cumulative increase is more than 10% over the three calendar years prior to the current year.
- Requires this notice to include a statement of any changes or improvements to the clinical efficacy of the drug that explain the WAC increase. Requires the manufacturer to state if there are no changes or improvements made to the clinical efficacy of the drug subject to the notice.
- Requires a PBM, if it receives a price increase notice, to notify its large contracting purchasers of the increase. Defines large purchasers as a purchaser that provides coverage to more than 500 covered lives.
- Requires drug manufacturers, at the time that the price increase described in 8) above takes effect, to report to OSHPD all of the following:
- A description of the specific financial and nonfinancial factors used to make the decision to increase the WAC and the amount of the increase, including, but not limited to, an explanation of how these factors justify the increase in the WAC of the drug;
- The previous year's marketing budget for the drug, including the budget for patient assistance programs specific to the drug;
- A schedule of WAC increases for the previous five years if the drug was manufactured by the company;
- If the drug was acquired by the manufacturer within the previous five years, to report to OSHPD all of the following:
- The WAC of the drug at the time of acquisition and in the calendar year prior to acquisition;
- The name of the company from which the drug was acquired, the date acquired, and the purchase price; and,
- The year the drug was introduced to market and the WAC at the time of introduction;
- The patent expiration date of the drug if it is under patent;
- If the drug is a multiple source drug, an innovator multiple source drug, a noninnovator multiple source drug, or a single source drug as defined in federal law;
- Documentation of increased clinical efficacy of the drug, if any. Requires the manufacturer to state if the drug does not exceed the clinical efficacy of existing treatments; and,
- Volume of sales of the drug in the United States for the previous year.
- Requires drug manufacturers to notify OSHPD in writing three days after federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of a new prescription drug to market at a WAC that exceeds the Medicare Part D specialty drug threshold. Allows a manufacturer to make this notification pending approval by the FDA, if commercial availability is expected within three days of approval.
- Requires drug manufacturers, no later than 30 days of the notification above, to report to OSHPD all of the following:
- A description of the marketing and pricing plans used in the launch of the new drug in the United States and internationally;
- The estimated volume of patients that may be prescribed the drug;
- Any documentation showing increased efficacy of the drug compared to existing treatments. Requires manufacturers to state if there are no changes or improvements made to the clinical efficacy of the drug subject to the notice;
- If the drug was granted breakthrough therapy designation or priority review by the FDA prior to final approval;
- The expected marketing budget for the drug, including the budget for patient assistance programs; and,
- The date and price of acquisition if the drug was not developed by the manufacturer.
- Requires OSHPD to post information on its Website on a quarterly basis for price increases and on a monthly basis for new drugs in a manner that identifies the information on a per-drug basis, and not be aggregated in a manner that would not allow identification of the drug.
- Establishes OSHPD enforcement responsibility in the provisions 11) to 14) above. Establishes a civil penalty of $1,000 per day for every day after the applicable notification period that the required information to specified purchasers is not reported. Requires a civil penalty to be assessed and recovered in a civil action brought by OSHPD. Permits OSHPD, upon request by a manufacturer, to review assessment of a civil penalty, and reduce or waive for good cause. Requires any money received by OSHPD be paid into the General Fund.
- Finds and declares that that it is necessary for the Legislature to limit the public’s right to information in order to protect proprietary, confidential information regarding health plan and insurer prescription drug utilization and spending information that is specific to a health plan or insurer to protect the integrity of the competitive market.
EXISTING LAW:
- Requires, under federal law, drug manufacturers to obtain approval of new drugs from the FDA.
- Sets forth, under federal law, the threshold for a specialty drug under the Medicare Part D program to qualify for placement on a specialty tier at $670 for a one-month supply of the drug for 2017.
- Establishes the DMHC to regulate health plans and CDI to regulate health insurers (collectively referred to as regulators).
- Requires health plans and health insurers to file specified rate information with regulators, as applicable, for health plan contracts or health insurance policies in the individual or small group markets.
- Requires, for large group health plan contracts and health insurance policies, health plans and insurers to file with regulators the weighted average rate increase for all large group benefit designs during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following calendar year, and to also disclose specified information for the aggregate rate information for the large group market.
- Requires health plans and health insurers, for the small group and individual markets, to file with regulators, specified days prior to implementing any rate change, specified rate information so that DMHC and CDI can review the information for unreasonable rate increases.
- Requires DMHC and CDI to accept and post on their Internet Websites any public comment on a rate increase submitted.
- Establishes the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law (Sherman Law), administered by the Department of Public Health (DPH), which, among other provisions, regulates the packaging, labeling, and advertising of drugs and medical devices in California.
- Prohibits, under the Sherman Law, the sale, delivery, or giving away of any new drug or new device unless it is either:
- A new drug, and a new drug application has been approved for it by the FDA, pursuant to federal law, or it is a new device for which a premarket approval application has been approved, and that approval has not been withdrawn, terminated, or suspended under the FDA; or
- A new drug or new device for which DPH has approved a new drug or device application, and has not withdrawn, terminated, or suspended that approval.
- Requires DPH to adopt regulations to establish the application form and set the fee for licensure and renewal of a drug or device license.
- Establishes OSHPD and requires each organization that operates, conducts, or maintains a health facility to make and file with OSHPD certain specified reports, including a hospital discharge abstract data record that currently includes 19 elements of data per admission that are required to be included.
- Requires OSHPD to compile and publish summaries of individual facility and aggregate data that do not contain patient-specific information for the purposes of public disclosure.
FISCAL EFFECT: According to Senate Appropriations:
- One-time costs of $75,000 and ongoing costs of about $200,000 per year for review of drug pricing information submitted by health plans and that information to report to the Legislature by the DMHC (Managed Care Fund).
- Likely ongoing costs in the low hundreds of thousands per year for review of drug pricing information submitted by health insurers and to report that information to the Legislature by CDI (Insurance Fund).
- Likely ongoing costs in the hundreds of thousands per year for OSHPD to adopt regulations, collect information from drug manufacturers, publish that information, and take any necessary enforcement action for noncompliance by drug manufacturers (General Fund).
COMMENTS:
- PURPOSE OF THIS BILL. According to the author, the introduction of new and innovative drugs is vital to our health care system, but these often high-priced treatments come with a multitude of challenges. Expensive drugs and steady price increases are becoming common-place with little transparency for astounding prices. This high-priced trend is a costly burden for patients, state programs, employers, and other payers, making it crucial that we understand what’s behind the exploding prices. The public and policymakers need greater insight that will allow us to identify strategies to ensure prices do not threaten access to life-saving treatments. Additionally, data suggest that publicly accessible price information in other sectors of the health care market encourages providers to offer more competitive pricing and thereby reduce excess health spending.
Transparency-focused policies in this state have led to rules requiring hospitals in California to provide information on pricing for common surgeries, health plans to submit detailed data regarding premium changes, and doctors to report more information to the federal government. But somehow, drug makers have been granted an exception to this forward-thinking trend. This bill will bring prescription drugs in line with the rest of the health care sector by shining a light on drugs that are having the greatest impact on our health care dollar. This change is absolutely necessary in an environment where consumer spending on prescription drugs increased by a staggering $65 billion from 2012 to 2015, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. These are drugs that treat diseases that impact millions of Americans, including hundreds of thousands of patients in public programs like Medi-Cal, and we have the right to know why they cost so much. - BACKGROUND.
- Health spending on prescription drugs. A study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in August 2016 reported that almost a quarter of 648 respondents to a 2015 poll reported that they or another family member did not fill a prescription in the last year because of cost. Data on national health expenditures reveal a similar pattern of rising costs. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) forecast summary indicates that for 2015-25, health spending is projected to grow at an average rate of 5.8% per year (4.8% on a per capita basis), which is 1.3% faster than the growth in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per year over this period. As a result, the health share of GDP is expected to rise from 17.5% in 2014 to 20.1% by 2025. Growth in health spending is expected to respond to changes in economic growth, faster growth in medical prices, and population aging. By the end of the projection, federal, state, and local governments are projected to finance 47% of national health spending (from 45% in 2014). With respect to prescription drugs, spending is projected to have grown 8.1% in 2015 and to have reached $321.9 billion, after a growth of 12.2% in 2014. CMS points out that this somewhat slower, but still relatively strong growth, is a result of the continued impact of newly approved and expensive drugs to treat conditions such as the hepatitis C virus (HCV) and cancer. Prescription drug spending is projected to grow an average of 6.7% per year for 2016 through 2025 as the influence on spending from newly approved drugs is expected to fade after two years of above average impacts. The point at which drug spending growth is projected to peak during the 10 year period is 2018; relatively fewer brand-name drugs are expected to lose patent protection and thus downward price pressure typically associated with the introduction of generic substitutes is somewhat mitigated.
- Prescription drug pricing. According to the JAMA article, the primary reason for increasing drug spending is the high price of branded products protected by market exclusivity provisions granted by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the FDA. The JAMA article reported that although brand-name drugs comprise only 10% of all dispensed prescriptions in the U.S., they account for 72% of drug spending. The JAMA article also stated that high prices have historically been limited to brand-name drugs that treat rare conditions, however, drugs that treat conditions affecting millions of individuals in the U.S. now also have high costs, for example many of the new oncology drugs. The JAMA article also stated that although brand-name drugs account for the greatest increase in prescription drug expenditures, another area that has captured the attention of the public and of policy makers is the sharp increase in the costs of some older generic drugs.
Due to the complexity and length of time invested in research, it is difficult for analysts and researchers to assess exactly how much it costs to bring one drug to market. The timeframe of development can last for decades, and may be a combination of efforts from multiple companies or previous research on other drugs. Beyond research and development costs, there are other business factors that manufacturers will take into account when determining the list price of a drug, including but not limited to marketing, sales, advertising, information technology, legal defense, and the cost of raw materials. A June 2016 California HealthCare Foundation’s Issue Brief contended that as a consequence of government benefits and restrictions, the favorable pricing for the Veterans Administration and Medicaid set the floor for the lowest prices that other purchasers may try to negotiate. Confounding this issue is the nondisclosure of net drug prices; purchasers have no method to calibrate the comparative value of the drugs they are purchasing since contracts remain confidential. Consequently, purchasers are prevented from comparison shopping net prices. The JAMA article also discussed the role of public and private payers during a drug’s exclusivity period and the negotiating power of the payer as the primary counterweight against excessive pricing.
- State spending. Typically, the state pays for prescription drugs under programs that provide health care or health insurance to certain state populations. For example, the state pays for prescription drugs through the health care coverage it provides to the state’s low-income residents through the Medi-Cal program and to current and retired state employees through CalPERS.
In 2015-16, Medi-Cal spent over $3.7 billion on outpatient prescription drugs, which represents 4.2% of the DHCS $87 billion 2015-16 Budget. The Governor’s 2017-18 Budget estimates that pharmacy fee-for-service spending (including prescribed drugs, medical supplies, and durable medical equipment) will be over $3.89 billion or 3.6% of the DHCS $102.6 billion Medi-Cal budget. These amounts do not include expenditures on prescription drugs made by Medi-Cal managed care plans.
In its 2015 Legislative Report, CalPERS described pharmacy trends and projected costs contributing significantly to the overall rates for the 2016 plan year. As a percentage of the overall rate increases for both the HMO and PPOs, about 45% is attributed to pharmacy; approximately 20% of the total pharmacy spending was attributable to each carrier’s top 10 drugs. The balance is attributed to medical expenses, federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act fees, and administrative fees. Additionally, a September 2016 presentation to the CalPERS Board of Administration entitled, “Prescription Drugs Utilization and Cost Trends,” included an analysis of claims data demonstrating that costs for prescription drugs continue to rise. The 2015 total prescription drug costs for drugs obtained through mail-order and at retail pharmacies for all CalPERS plans were $2.1 billion, which represented nearly a 10% increase over the costs of $1.9 billion in 2014. The top 10 non-specialty drugs accounted for $213 million spending or 14% of the total non-specialty drug cost in 2015.
- Assembly Health Informational Hearing. In an effort to understand the factors that lead to unexpected drug price increases and offer meaningful solutions that assure patient access while controlling costs, this Committee held a series of informational hearings on prescription drug pricing. The first informational hearing entitled, “Understanding the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain: What is Driving Up the Cost of Drugs,” was held on October 31, 2016, and provided a historical perspective on drug pricing, discussed the economics of drug pricing, and included an overview of the pharmaceutical supply chain. The second hearing entitled, “Impact of Rising Drug Costs on Public and Private Payers,” focused on the impact of prescription drug costs to public and private payers and how this influences the total cost of health care delivery in California. The hearing explored how the public and private sectors obtain prescription drugs, discuss trends in drug pricing, develop formularies, and various steps that payers are utilizing to address the escalating prices of prescriptions drugs.
- Other states. Other states have enacted legislation to address concerns relating to high prescription drug spending. For example, Vermont enacted legislation that requires state officials to identify 15 drugs for which “significant health care dollars” are spent, and where WAC rose by 50% or more over the previous five-year period. Alternatively, they must identify list prices for 15 medicines that rose 15% or more over a 12-month period. Afterwards, the state attorney general must contact each drug maker to obtain justification for price hikes. The companies must submit information concerning all factors that contributed to the price increases, including detailed cost breakdowns. Ultimately, this information is collected in a report and posted on a public Website. Each violation carries a $10,000 penalty. The Vermont law requires state officials to identify 15 drugs for which “significant health care dollars” are spent, and where list prices rose by 50% or more over the previous five-year period. Alternatively, they must identify list prices for 15 medicines that rose 15% or more over a 12-month period. Maryland became the first state to enact legislation that outlaws “price gouging” in the generic drug market. Maryland’s law, enacted on May 27, 2017, has two components: i) a prohibition on price gouging; and, ii) a mechanism for reporting, investigating, and penalizing price gouging in the state’s Medicaid program. Lastly, Nevada signed into law legislation requiring pharmaceutical companies to release insulin prices. The Nevada law mandates pharmaceutical companies to disclose how they set insulin prices, manufacturing costs, research investments and projects annually.
- SUPPORT. Health Access California (HAC), a cosponsor of this bill, states that California for decades has made public information on costs and quality of health facilities because of the impact on purchases. HAC contends that his bill will help to fill the gap on prescription drug prices. California Labor Federation, also a cosponsor of this bill, writes that according to insurers’ 2016 filings with state regulators, prescription drug costs are expected to rise at a greater rate than overall medical costs, with increases as high as 18%. Small Business Majority states that this bill will bring more stability to the pricing of health coverage in the marketplaces, which is beneficial to small employers, health insurers and the health care system overall.
- OPPOSITION. Biotechnology Innovation Organization is concerned that this bill is intended to impose a form of price control that will scare away investors and disproportionately harm small biotech companies. Sanofi contends that this bill’s mandates interfere with the robust market forces that dictate the environment around pharmaceutical company business practices without adequately protecting proprietary information or directly benefiting the consumer. The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) contends that the disclosed information in this bill would paint a misleading and inaccurate portrait of actual drug prices to health plans. PhRMA states that this bill would ignore the significant negotiated rebates and discounts payers and large provider groups can obtain from manufacturers.
- COMMITTEE AMENDMENTS. To address concerns, the Committee proposes to amend this bill as follows:
- Reduce advance notice to purchasers from 90 days to 60 days;
- Eliminate tiers so there is only one percentage increase trigger for notice;
- Narrow scope by inserting a floor in the trigger to exempt some drugs;
- Narrow scope by reducing the three year look-back to two years;
- Include a mechanism so that drug companies have a known, limited list of entities to report to; and,
- Increase confidentiality by providing some limits on pricing information that is reported.
- RELATED LEGISLATION.
- SB 790 (McGuire) prohibits a drug manufacturer or a wholesaler from offering or giving a gift, as defined, to a health care provider. Prohibits a drug manufacturer or an entity on behalf of a drug manufacturer from providing a fee, payment, subsidy, or other economic benefit to a health care provider in connection with the provider’s participation in research, with some exceptions. Authorizes the Attorney General to bring an action to enforce a violation of these provisions and to seek injunctive relief and imposition of a civil penalty for each violation, as specified. Requires a health care professional, as defined, who is a member of a committee that sets formularies or develops clinical guidelines and who also serves as a speaker or commercial consultant for a drug manufacturer to disclose to the committee his or her relationship with the manufacturer, as specified. SB 790 is pending in the Assembly Health Committee.
- AB 265 (Wood) prohibits prescription drug manufacturers from offering discounts or other reductions in an individual's out-of-pocket expenses associated with his or her insurance coverage, if a lower cost therapeutically equivalent generic drug is available. AB 265 is pending in the Senate Health Committee.
- AB 315 (Wood) requires PBMs to be licensed by DMHC; requires a PBM to periodically disclose to a purchaser certain information such as drug acquisition cost, rebates received from pharmaceutical manufacturers, and rates negotiated with pharmacies; and applies these provisions to a contract or contractual relationship between a PBM and a purchaser that is entered into, issued, amended, renewed, or delivered on or after January 1, 2018. AB 315 is pending in the Senate Health Committee.
- PREVIOUS LEGISLATION.
- SB 1010 (Hernandez) of 2016 was substantially similar to this bill. SB 1010 was placed on the inactive file on the Assembly Floor.
- AB 2436 (Roger Hernández) of 2016 would have required carriers to provide, at the time that a prescription drug is delivered or within 30 days of purchase, specified information related to the cost of the prescription drug. AB 2436 died on the Assembly Floor.
- AB 2711 (Chiu) of 2016 would have reinstated a previously repealed requirement for the Department of General Services to report to the Legislature on its prescription drug bulk purchasing program. AB 2711 was held on the Assembly Appropriations Committee suspense file.
- AB 463 (Chiu) of 2015 would have required pharmaceutical companies to file an annual report with OSHPD containing specified information regarding the development and pricing of prescription drugs. The Assembly Health Committee hearing was canceled at the request of the author.
- AB 339 (Gordon), Chapter 619, Statutes of 2015, requires carriers that provide coverage for outpatient prescription drugs to have formularies that do not discourage the enrollment of individuals with health conditions, and requires combination antiretroviral drug treatment coverage of a single-tablet that is as effective as a multitablet regimen for treatment of HIV/AIDS, as specified. AB 339 places in state law, federal requirements related to pharmacy and therapeutics committees, access to in-network retail pharmacies, standardized formulary requirements, formulary tier requirements similar to those required of health plans and insurers participating in Covered California and copayment caps of $250 and $500 for a supply of up to 30 days for an individual prescription, as specified.
- SB 1052 (Torres), Chapter 575, Statutes of 2014, requires health plans and insurers to use a standard drug formulary template to display their drug formularies and to post their formularies on their Internet Websites and requires Covered California to provide links to the formularies.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
California Labor Federation (cosponsor)
Health Access California (cosponsor)
UNITE HERE (cosponsor)
AARP
AFSCME Local 1001
America’s Health Insurance Plans
American Academy of Pediatrics
American Association of Retired Persons-California
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO
Anthem Blue Cross
APLA Health
Association of California Life & Health Insurance Companies
Blue Shield of California
California Academy of Family Physicians
California Chapter of the American College of Physicians
California Alliance for Retired Americans
California Association of Health Plans
California Association of Health Underwriters
California Black Health Network
California Conference Board of the Amalgamated Transit Union
California Conference of Machinists
California Health Professional Student Alliance
California Hospital Association
California Immigrant Policy Center
California LGBT Health & Human Services Network
California Nurses Association
California Optometric Association
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network
California Pharmacists Association
California Physicians Alliance
California Professional Firefighters
California Public Employees’ Retirement System
California Retired Teachers Association
California School Employees Association
California State Retirees
California Teachers Association
California Teamsters Public Affairs Council
CALPIRG
Carson Chamber of Commerce
Children Now
City and County of San Francisco
Congress of California Seniors
Consumer Federation of California
Consumers Union
Courage Campaign
Engineers and Scientists of California
Epilepsy California
Equality California
Fresno Chamber of Commerce
Gilroy Chamber of Commerce
Greater Conejo Valley Chamber of Commerce
Health Net
Hollywood Chamber of Commerce
I.A.T.S.E. Local 80
International Longshore and Warehouse Union
Irwindale Chamber of Commerce
J. Glynn & Company
Justice in Aging
Kaiser Permanente
Kaiser Permanente
Kern County Hispanic Chamber of Commerce
Latino Coalition for a Healthy California
League of California Cities
LIUNA Locals 777 & 792
Livermore Valley Chamber of Commerce
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce
Los Angeles County Professional Peace Officers Association
Manteca Chamber of Commerce
Molina Healthcare of California
Montebello Chamber of Commerce
National Association of Social Workers – California Chapter
National Health Law Program
National Multiple Sclerosis Society
NextGen Climate
Oakland Chamber of Commerce
Orange County Hispanic Chamber of Commerce
Orange County Professional Firefighters Association, Local 3631
Pacific Business Group on Health
Pajaro Valley Chamber of Commerce and Agriculture
Pasadena Chamber of Commerce & Civic Association
Personal Assistance Services Council
Professional & Technical Engineers, Local 21
Professional & Technical Engineers, Local 21, AFL-CIO
Professional Assistance Services Council
Project Inform
Regional Chamber of Commerce – San Gabriel Valley
Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce
San Mateo Chamber of Commerce
San Ramon Chamber of Commerce
Santa Clara County Office of Education
School Employers Association of California
Service Employees International Union, SEIU Local 1000
Service Employees International Union - California
Silicon Valley Employers Forum
Small Business Majority
Small School Districts’ Association
Tenet Healthcare
The Black Chamber of Silicon Valley
The Silicon Valley Organization
United Food and Commercial Workers Union – Western States Council
United Nurses Association of California/ Union of Health Care Professionals
Utility Workers Union of America, Local 132
Western Center on Law & Poverty
Several individuals
Opposition
Biocom
Biotechnology Innovation Organization
California Hepatitis C Task Force
California Life Sciences Association
California’s Senior Advocates League
Eli Lilly & Company
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
Plasma Protein Therapeutics Association
Sanofi
Analysis Prepared by: Kristene Mapile / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097
Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | SB 17 |
THIRD READING
Bill No: SB 17
Amended: 4/25/17
SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE: 7-2, 4/19/17
AYES: Hernandez, Atkins, Leyva, Mitchell, Monning, Newman, Roth
NOES: Nguyen, Nielsen
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 5-2, 5/25/17
AYES: Lara, Beall, Bradford, Hill, Wiener
NOES: Bates, Nielsen
SUBJECT: Health care: prescription drug costs
SOURCE: California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO
Health Access California
UNITE HERE!
DIGEST:
This bill requires health plans and insurers that report rate information through the existing large and small group rate review process to also report specified information related to prescription drug pricing to Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) and California Department of Insurance (CDI). This bill requires DMHC and CDI to compile specified information into a consumer-friendly report that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. This bill requires drug manufacturers to notify specified purchasers, in writing at least 90 days prior to the planned effective date, if it is increasing the wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) of a prescription drug by specified amounts. This bill requires drug manufacturers to notify Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) three days after federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval when introducing a new drug to market at a WAC that exceeds the Medicare Part D specialty drug threshold. This bill requires drug manufacturers to provide specified information to OSHPD related to the drug’s price.
Existing law:
- Establishes DMHC to regulate health plans and CDI to regulate insurers, including health insurers (referred to as “regulators”).
- Requires health plans and health insurers to file specified rate information with regulators, as applicable, for health plan contracts or health insurance policies in the individual or small group markets and for health plan contracts and health insurance policies in the large group market.
- Requires, for large group health plan contracts and health insurance policies, plans and insurers to file with regulators the weighted average rate increase for all large group benefit designs during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following calendar year, and to also disclose specified information for the aggregate rate information for the large group market.
- Requires health plans and health insurers, for the small group and individual markets, to file with regulators, at least 60 days prior to implementing any rate change, specified rate information so that the departments can review the information for unreasonable rate increases.
- Requires, under federal law, drug manufacturers to obtain approval of new drugs from the FDA.
- Establishes the Sherman Law, administered by Department of Public Health (DPH), which, among other things, regulates the packaging, labeling, and advertising of drugs and medical devices in California.
- Prohibits, in the Sherman Law, the sale, delivery, or giving away of any new drug or new device unless it is either:
- A new drug, and a new drug application has been approved for it by the FDA, pursuant to federal law, or it is a new device for which a premarket approval application has been approved, and that approval has not been withdrawn, terminated, or suspended under the FDA; or
- A new drug or new device for which DPH has approved a new drug or device application, and has not withdrawn, terminated, or suspended that approval.
- Requires DPH to adopt regulations to establish the application form and set the fee for licensure and renewal of a drug or device license.
This bill:
Health Plan Reporting
- Requires health plans and insurers that report rate information in the small and large group markets, beginning October 1, 2018, to annually report to regulators the following information about all covered drugs (categorized by generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs):
- The 25 most frequently prescribed drugs;
- The 25 most costly drugs by total annual spending; and,
- The 25 drugs with the highest year-over-year increase in total annual spending.
- Requires regulators to compile this information into a report, to be posted on their Web sites beginning on January 1, 2019, that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. Requires regulators to keep confidential all of the information provided to the department pursuant to 1) above, and requires the information to be protected from public disclosure.
- Requires the data reported by regulators to be aggregated and to not reveal information specific to individual health plans/insurers.
- Requires health plans and insurers, beginning October 1, 2018, to annually report, as part of the large group rate review process, to report the following (categorized by generic drugs, brand name drugs excluding specialty drugs, and specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use):
- The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drug costs for the prior year for each category of prescription drugs;
- The year-over-year increase, as a percentage, in total spending for each category of prescription drugs;
- The year-over-year increase in per-member, per-month costs for drug prices compared to other components of the health care premium;
- The specialty tier formulary list;
- The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drugs administered in a doctor's office that are covered under the medical benefit as separate from the pharmacy benefit, if available; and,
- Information on its use of a pharmacy benefit manager (PBM), if any, including its name and which components of the prescription drug coverage are managed by the PBM.
- Requires the information reported under these provisions to be included as part of the public meeting that is required as part of the large group rate review process.
Prior notice of price increases for prescription drugs
- Requires drug manufacturers to notify state purchasers (CalPERS, Medi-Cal, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and Department of General Services), health plans and insurers, and PBMs at least 90 days prior to the planned effective date, of an increase in the WAC of a prescription drug as follows:
- For drugs with a WAC below the Medicare Part D specialty drug threshold, when the increase is 25% or more over a three calendar year period; and,
- For drugs with a WAC above the Medicare Part D specialty drug threshold, when the increase is 10% or more over a three calendar year period.
- Requires this notice to include a statement of any changes or improvements to the clinical efficacy of the drug that explain the price increase. If there are no changes or improvements made to the clinical efficacy of the drug subject to the notice, requires the manufacturer to state that.
- Requires a PBM, if it receives a price increase notice, to notify its large contracting purchasers of the increase.
- Requires drug manufacturers, at the time that the price increase described above takes effect, to report to OSHPD all of the following:
- A description of factors used to make the decision to increase the drug’s price and the amount of the increase, including, but not limited to, an explanation of how these factors justify the increase in the WAC of the drug;
- The previous year's marketing budget for the drug, including the budget for patient assistance programs specific to the drug; and,
- A schedule of price increases for the previous five years if the drug was manufactured by the company.
- Requires the drug manufacturer, if the drug was acquired by the manufacturer within the previous five years, to report all of the following:
- The WAC of the drug at the time of acquisition and in the calendar year prior to acquisition;
- The name of the company from which the drug was acquired, the date acquired, and the purchase price;
- The year the drug was introduced to market and the WAC at the time of introduction;
- The patent expiration date of the drug if it is under patent;
- If the drug is a multiple source drug, an innovator multiple source drug, a noninnovator multiple source drug, or a single source drug;
- Documentation of increased clinical efficacy of the drug, if any. If the drug does not exceed the clinical efficacy of existing treatments, the manufacturer must state that; and,
- Volume of sales of the drug in the United States for the previous year.
Notice of introduction of new high-cost prescription drugs
- Requires drug manufacturers to notify OSHPD three days after FDA approval of a new prescription drug to market at a WAC that exceeds the Medicare Part D specialty drug threshold.
- Requires drug manufacturers, no later than 30 days of the notification above, to report to OSHPD all of the following:
- A description of the marketing and pricing plans used in the launch of the new drug in the United States and internationally;
- The estimated volume of patients that may be prescribed the drug;
- Any documentation showing increased efficacy of the drug compared to existing treatments. Requires manufacturers to state if there are no changes or improvements made to the clinical efficacy of the drug subject to the notice;
- If the drug was granted breakthrough therapy designation or priority review by the FDA prior to final approval;
- The expected marketing budget for the drug, including the budget for patient assistance programs; and,
- The date and price of acquisition if the drug was not developed by the manufacturer.
- Requires OSHPD to post this information on its Web site on a quarterly basis for price increases and on a monthly basis for new drugs in in a manner that identifies the information on a per-drug basis, and not be aggregated in a manner that would not allow identification of the drug.
Comments
Author’s statement. The introduction of new and innovative drugs is vital to our health care system, but these often high-priced treatments come with a multitude of challenges. Expensive drugs and steady price increases are becoming common-place with little transparency for astounding prices. This high-priced trend is a costly burden for patients, state programs, employers, and other payers, making it crucial that we understand what’s behind the exploding prices. The public and policymakers need greater insight that will allow us to identify strategies to ensure prices do not threaten access to life-saving treatments. Additionally, data suggest that publically accessible price information in other sectors of the health care market encourage providers to offer more competitive pricing and thereby reduce excess health spending. Transparency-focused policies in this state have led to rules requiring hospitals in California to provide information on pricing for common surgeries, health plans to submit detailed data regarding premium changes, and doctors to report more information to the federal government. But somehow, drug makers have been granted an exception to this forward-thinking trend. This bill will bring prescription drugs in line with the rest of the health care sector by shining a light on drugs that are having the greatest impact on our health care dollar. This change is absolutely necessary in an environment where consumer spending on prescription drugs increased by a staggering $65 billion from 2012 to 2015, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. These are drugs that treat diseases that impact millions of Americans, including hundreds of thousands of patients in public programs like Medi-Cal, and we have the right to know why they cost so much.
NOTE: See the Senate Health Committee analysis of this bill for more detailed background of this bill.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: Yes
According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:
- One-time costs of $75,000 and ongoing costs of about $200,000 per year for review of drug pricing information submitted by health plans and to report to the Legislature by DMHC (Managed Care Fund).
- Likely ongoing costs in the low hundreds of thousands per year for review of drug pricing information submitted by health insurers and to report to the Legislature by CDI (Insurance Fund).
- Likely ongoing costs in the hundreds of thousands per year for OSHPD to adopt regulations, collect information from drug manufacturers, publish that information, and take any necessary enforcement action for noncompliance by drug manufacturers (General Fund).
California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO (co-source)
Health Access California (co-source)
UNITE HERE! (co-source)
AARP
AFSCME, AFL-CIO
America’s Health Insurance Plans
American Academy of Pediatrics
Anthem Blue Cross
APLA Health
Asian Law Alliance
Association of California Life and Health Insurance Companies
Blue Shield of California
California Alliance for Retired Americans
California Association of Health Plans
California Association of Health Underwriters
California Black Health Network
California Conference Board of the Amalgamated Transit Union
California Conference of Machinists
California Hospital Association
California Immigrant Policy Center
California LGBT Health and Human Services Network
California Medical Association
California Nurses Association/National Nurses United
California Optometric Association
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network
California Physicians Alliance
California Professional Firefighters
California Retired Teachers Association
California School Employees Association
California State Retirees
California Teachers Association
California Teamsters Public Affairs Council
CALPIRG
Carson Chamber of Commerce
Children NOW
City and County of San Francisco
Community Medical Centers of Fresno
Congress of California Seniors
Consumer Federation of California
Consumers Union
Courage Campaign
Engineers and Scientists of California, IFPTE Local 20
Epilepsy California
Equality California
Fresno Chamber of Commerce
Gilroy Chamber of Commerce
Greater Conejo Valley Chamber of Commerce
International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Local 80
International Longshore and Warehouse Union
Irwindale Chamber of Commerce
J. Glynn and Company
Justice in Aging
Kaiser Permanente
Kern County Hispanic Chamber of Commerce
Latino Coalition for a Healthy California
League of California Cities
LIUNA Locals 777 & 792
Livermore Valley Chamber of Commerce
Long Beach Area Chamber of Commerce
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce
Los Angeles County Professional Peace Officers Association
Manteca Chamber of Commerce
Molina Healthcare
Montebello Chamber of Commerce
National Association of Social Workers, California Chapter
National Health Law Program
National Multiple Sclerosis Society – California Action Network
NextGen Climate
Oakland Chamber of Commerce
Orange County Hispanic Chamber of Commerce
Orange County Professional Firefighters Association, Local 3631
Pacific Business Group on Health
Pasadena Chamber of Commerce
Personal Assistance Services Council
Professional and Technical Engineers, IFPTE Local
Project Inform
Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce
San Francisco Culinary, Bartenders and Service Employees Welfare Fund
San Gabriel Valley Chamber of Commerce
San Mateo Area Chamber of Commerce
School Employers Association of California
SEIU California
Silicon Valley Black Chamber of Commerce
Silicon Valley Employers Forum
Small Business Majority
Small School Districts Association
Southwest California Legislative Council
Tenet Health
The Silicon Valley Organization
United Food and Commercial Workers
United Nurses Associations of California/Union of Health Care Professionals
Utility Workers Union of America
Western Center on Law and Poverty
OPPOSITION: (Verified 5/30/17)
Association for Accessible Medicines
Biocom
Biotechnology Innovation Organization
California Life Sciences Association
Eli Lilly & Company
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
Plasma Protein Therapeutics Association
Prepared by: Melanie Moreno / HEALTH /
**** END ****
SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair
2017 - 2018 Regular Session
SB 17 (Hernandez) - Health care: prescription drug costs
Version: April 25, 2017 | Policy Vote: HEALTH 7 - 2 |
Urgency: No | Mandate: Yes |
Hearing Date: May 15, 2017 | Consultant: Brendan McCarthy |
This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.
Bill Summary:
SB 17 would require health plans and health insurers that report information on premium rates to their regulator to also include specified information relating to prescription drug spending. The bill would require drug manufacturers to report to state purchasers of health care services when drug prices are going to increase by more than specified percentages or when new drugs costing more than the Medicare specialty drug threshold are going to be introduced to the market.
Fiscal Impact:
- One-time costs of $75,000 and ongoing costs of about $200,000 per year for review of drug pricing information submitted by health plans and to report to the Legislature by the Department of Managed Health Care (Managed Care Fund).
- Likely ongoing costs in the low hundreds of thousands per year for review of drug pricing information submitted by health insurers and to report to the Legislature by the Department of Insurance (Insurance Fund).
- Likely ongoing costs in the hundreds of thousands per year for the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development to adopt regulations, collect information from drug manufacturers, publish that information, and take any necessary enforcement action for noncompliance by drug manufacturers (General Fund).
Background:
Under current law, proposed rate increases in the individual market and small group markets are reviewed by either the Department of Insurance or Department of Managed Health Care to determine whether they are reasonable. Neither department has the authority to regulate proposed rates, even if they are found to be unreasonable. Also, in the large group market, health plans and health insurers are required to file specified aggregate information about proposed rate increases.
Proposed Law:
SB 17 would require health plans and health insurers that report information on premium rates to their regulator to also include specified information relating to prescription drug spending. The bill would require drug manufacturers to report to state purchasers of health care services when drug prices are going to increase by more than specified percentages or when new drugs costing more than the Medicare specialty drug threshold are going to be introduced to the market.
Specific provisions of the bill would:
- Require health plans and health insurers that report information to their regulator regarding rate increases in the individual and small group markets to also include information on prescription drug spending;
- Require the information for the individual and small group market to include information on the 25 most frequently prescribed drugs, the 25 most costly drugs, and the 25 drugs with the highest increase in cost and their average wholesale price;
- Require the Department of Insurance and the Department of Managed Health Care to compile the above information and report on the overall impact of drug prices on health care premiums;
- Require the Department of Insurance and the Department of Managed Health Care to keep the information provided under the bill confidential;
- Require health plans and health insurers in the large group market that report on premium rate increases to include information on the share of premiums attributable to drug prices, increases in premiums attributable to drug prices, and information on the specialty drug tier formulary list;
- Require manufacturers of prescription drugs to notify state health care purchasers, health plans, and health insurers of a drug price increase if the wholesale acquisition cost of a drug under the Medicare threshold for specialty drugs will have increased by more than 25% over three years or if the wholesale acquisition price of a prescription drug over the Medicare threshold for specialty drugs will have increased by more than 10% over three years;
- Require manufacturers to also provide the above information to the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development;
- Require manufacturers of prescription drugs to notify the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development if a new drug is coming to market with a wholesale acquisition cost over the Medicare threshold for specialty drugs (about $8,000 per year in 2017);
- Require the Office to make that information available to the public monthly;
- Require the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development to enforce the requirements of the bill on drug manufacturers;
- Impose a civil penalty of $1,000 per day for failure to report the required information to state purchasers.
Related Legislation:
- SB 1010 (Hernandez, 2016) was substantially similar to this bill. That bill was not taken up on the Assembly Floor.
- SB 790 (McGuire) would place restrictions on drug manufacturers providing gifts or other financial incentives to health care providers. That bill will be heard in this committee.
- AB 265 (Wood) would prohibit prescription drug manufacturers from offering financial incentives to reduce consumer out-of-pocket expenses for prescription drugs, under specified circumstances. That bill is pending in the Assembly.
Staff Comments:
The bill requires additional disclosure of the impacts of prescription drug prices to state regulators and purchasers. In doing so, the bill will give the state and the public better information on the impact of drug pricing on overall health care costs. However, it is not likely that the requirement to provide this information to the state will provide a sufficient incentive for drug companies to actually reduce prices. Therefore, it is unlikely that the bill will result in reduced health care spending on prescription drugs.
The opponents of the bill have raised concerns that the prior notification of prescription drug price increases will result in some participants in the drug distribution system (such as pharmacies or hospitals) purchasing excess quantities of drugs at the current price, in anticipation of selling those drugs at the increased price. This may occur to some extent, although the current logistics of the pharmaceutical industry may impose practical limitations on such practices. In the long-run, any such price increases would only be temporary in nature and are not likely to substantially increase overall drug spending by payers.
The only costs that may be incurred by a local agency relate to crimes and infractions. Under the California Constitution, such costs are not reimbursable by the state.
-- END --
SENATE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH
Senator Ed Hernandez, O.D., Chair
BILL NO: SB 17
AUTHOR: | Hernandez | ||
VERSION: | March 14, 2017 | ||
HEARING DATE: | April 19, 2017 | ||
CONSULTANT: | Melanie Moreno | ||
SUBJECT: Health care: prescription drug costs
SUMMARY:
- Requires health plans and insurers that report rate information through the existing large and small group rate review process to also report specified information related to prescription drug pricing to Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) and California Department of Insurance (CDI). Requires DMHC and CDI to compile specified reported information into a consumer-friendly report that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. Requires drug manufacturers to notify specified state purchasers, health plans, and health insurers, in writing at least 90 days prior to the planned effective date, if it is increasing the wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) of a prescription drug by specified amounts. Requires drug manufacturers to notify OSHPD within three days of commercial availability if it is introducing a new prescription drug to market at a WAC that exceeds the Medicare Part D specialty drug threshold. Requires drug manufacturers to provide specified information to the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development related to the drug’s price.
Existing law:
- Establishes DMHC to regulate health plans and CDI to regulate insurers, including health insurers (referred to as “regulators”).
- Requires health plans and health insurers to file specified rate information with regulators, as applicable, for health plan contracts or health insurance policies in the individual or small group markets and for health plan contracts and health insurance policies in the large group market.
- Requires, for large group health plan contracts and health insurance policies, plans and insurers to file with regulators the weighted average rate increase for all large group benefit designs during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following calendar year, and to also disclose specified information for the aggregate rate information for the large group market.
- Requires health plans and health insurers, for the small group and individual markets, to file with regulators, at least 60 days prior to implementing any rate change, specified rate information so that the departments can review the information for unreasonable rate increases.
- Requires regulators to accept and post to their Internet Web sites any public comment on a rate increase submitted to the departments during the 60-day period.
- Under federal law, requires drug manufacturers to obtain approval of new drugs from the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
- Establishes the Sherman Law, administered by Department of Public Health (DPH), which, among other things, regulates the packaging, labeling, and advertising of drugs and medical devices in California.
- Prohibits, in the Sherman Law, the sale, delivery, or giving away of any new drug or new device unless it is either:
- A new drug, and a new drug application has been approved for it by the FDA, pursuant to federal law, or it is a new device for which a premarket approval application has been approved, and that approval has not been withdrawn, terminated, or suspended under the FDA; or
- A new drug or new device for which DPH has approved a new drug or device application, and has not withdrawn, terminated, or suspended that approval.
- Requires DPH to adopt regulations to establish the application form and set the fee for licensure and renewal of a drug or device license.
This bill:
Health Plan Reporting
- Requires health plans and insurers that report rate information in the small and large group markets, beginning October 1, 2018, to annually report to regulators the following information about all covered drugs (categorized by generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs):
- The 25 most frequently prescribed drugs;
- The 25 most costly drugs by total annual spending; and,
- The 25 drugs with the highest year-over-year increase in total annual spending.
- Requires regulators to compile this information into a report, to be posted on their websites beginning on January 1, 2019, that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums. Requires regulators to keep confidential all of the information provided pursuant to 1) above except for this report, and exempts this information from disclosure under the California Public Records Act.
- Requires the data reported by regulators to be aggregated and to not reveal information specific to individual health plans/insurers.
- Requires health plans and insurers, beginning October 1, 2018, to annually report, as part of the large group rate review process, to report the following (categorized by generic drugs, brand name drugs excluding specialty drugs, and specialty drugs dispensed at a plan pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use):
- The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drug costs for the prior year for each category of prescription drugs;
- The year-over-year increase, as a percentage, in total spending for each category of prescription drugs;
- The year-over-year increase in per-member, per-month costs for drug prices compared to other components of the health care premium;
- The specialty tier formulary list;
- The percentage of the premium attributable to prescription drugs administered in a doctor's office that are covered under the medical benefit as separate from the pharmacy benefit, if available; and,
- Information on its use of a pharmacy benefit manager (PBM), if any, including its name and which components of the prescription drug coverage are managed by the PBM.
- Requires the information reported under these provisions to be included as part of the public meeting that is required as part of the large group rate review process.
Prior notice of price increases for prescription drugs
- Requires drug manufacturers to notify state purchasers (CalPERS, Medi-Cal, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and Department of General Services), health plans and insurers, and PBMs at least 90 days prior to the planned effective date, of an increase in the WAC of a prescription drug as follows:
- For drugs with a WAC below the Medicare Part D specialty drug threshold, when the increase is 25% or more over a three calendar year period; and,
- For drugs with a WAC above the Medicare Part D specialty drug threshold, when the increase is 10% or more over a three calendar year period.
- Requires this notice to include a statement of any changes or improvements to the clinical efficacy of the drug that explain the price increase. If there are no changes or improvements made to the clinical efficacy of the drug subject to the notice, requires the manufacturer to state that.
- Requires a PBM, if it receives a price increase notice, to notify its large contracting purchasers of the increase.
- Requires drug manufacturers, at the time that the price increase described above takes effect, to report to OSHPD all of the following:
- A description of factors used to make the decision to increase the drug’s price and the amount of the increase, including, but not limited to, an explanation of how these factors justify the increase in the WAC of the drug;
- The previous year's marketing budget for the drug, including the budget for patient assistance programs specific to the drug; and,
- A schedule of price increases for the previous five years if the drug was manufactured by the company.
- Requires the drug manufacturer, if the drug was acquired by the manufacturer within the previous five years, to report all of the following:
- The WAC of the drug at the time of acquisition and in the calendar year prior to acquisition;
- The name of the company from which the drug was acquired, the date acquired, and the purchase price;
- The year the drug was introduced to market and the WAC at the time of introduction;
- The patent expiration date of the drug if it is under patent;
- If the drug is a multiple source drug, an innovator multiple source drug, a noninnovator multiple source drug, or a single source drug;
- Documentation of increased clinical efficacy of the drug, if any. If the drug does not exceed the clinical efficacy of existing treatments, the manufacturer must state that; and,
- Volume of sales of the drug in the United States for the previous year.
Notice of introduction of new high-cost prescription drugs
- Requires drug manufacturers to notify OSHPD within three days of commercial availability if it is introducing a new prescription drug to market at a WAC that exceeds the Medicare Part D specialty drug threshold.
- Requires drug manufacturers, within 30 days of the notification above, to report to OSHPD all of the following:
- A description of the marketing and pricing plans used in the launch of the new drug in the United States and internationally;
- The estimated volume of patients that may be prescribed the drug;
- Any documentation showing increased efficacy of the drug compared to existing treatments. Requires manufacturers to state if there are no changes or improvements made to the clinical efficacy of the drug subject to the notice;
- If the drug was granted breakthrough therapy designation or priority review by the FDA prior to final approval;
- The expected marketing budget for the drug, including the budget for patient assistance programs; and,
- The date and price of acquisition if the drug was not developed by the manufacturer.
- Requires OSHPD to post this information on its website on a quarterly basis for price increases and on a monthly basis for new drugs in in a manner that identifies the information on a per-drug basis, and not be aggregated in a manner that would not allow identification of the drug.
FISCAL EFFECT:
This bill has not been analyzed by a fiscal committee.
COMMENTS:
- Author’s statement. The introduction of new and innovative drugs is vital to our health care system, but these often high-priced treatments come with a multitude of challenges. Expensive drugs and steady price increases are becoming common-place with little transparency for astounding prices. This high-priced trend is a costly burden for patients, state programs, employers, and other payers, making it crucial that we understand what’s behind the exploding prices. The public and policymakers need greater insight that will allow us to identify strategies to ensure prices do not threaten access to life-saving treatments. Additionally, data suggest that publically accessible price information in other sectors of the health care market encourage providers to offer more competitive pricing and thereby reduce excess health spending. Transparency-focused policies in this state have led to rules requiring hospitals in California to provide information on pricing for common surgeries, health plans to submit detailed data regarding premium changes, and doctors to report more information to the federal government. But somehow, drug makers have been granted an exception to this forward-thinking trend. This bill will bring prescription drugs in line with the rest of the health care sector by shining a light on drugs that are having the greatest impact on our health care dollar. This change is absolutely necessary in an environment where consumer spending on prescription drugs increased by a staggering $65 billion from 2012 to 2015, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. These are drugs that treat diseases that impact millions of Americans, including hundreds of thousands of patients in public programs like Medi-Cal, and we have the right to know why they cost so much.
- Health care costs. According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), in 2015, U.S. health care spending increased 5.8% to reach $3.2 trillion, or $9,990 per person. The coverage expansion that began in 2014 as a result of in the Affordable Care Act continued to have an impact on the growth of health care spending in 2015. Additionally, faster growth in total health care spending in 2015 was driven by stronger growth in spending for private health insurance, hospital care, physician and clinical services, and the continued strong growth in Medicaid and retail prescription drug spending. Health care costs continue to consume significantly large percentages of federal, state and personal budgets. Health care continues to grow at higher rates than inflation. In 2013, the U.S. spent far more on health care than other high-income countries. Higher spending is due to multiple factors including greater use of medical technology and higher health care prices, not necessarily more frequent doctor visits or hospital admissions.
- Drug costs. According to CMS, although retail prescription drug spending slowed in 2015, it still increased by 9% to $324.6 billion. Although growth in 2015 was slower than the 12.4% growth in 2014, spending on prescription drugs outpaced all other services in 2015. The growth in spending for prescription drugs is attributed to increased spending on new medicines, price growth for existing brand name drugs, increased spending on generics, and fewer expensive blockbuster drugs going off-patent. A Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of data from CMS and Truven Health Analytics shows that while drugs account for 10% of U.S. health spending, it represents 19% of the cost of employer insurance benefits. Some speculate that this disparity exists because the $3 trillion in U.S. health spending is a broad catchall with includes hospital care, physician services, drugs, research, administrative costs, public health activities, and long-term care. Additionally, some of the people served by Medicare and Medicaid (whose spending is counted in the national totals) require many services not typically used by those covered by employer health plans. According to an analysis by the CEO of the Kaiser Family Foundation, even that 19% figure is understated because while it includes prescriptions that patients fill at pharmacies, it does not include many of the expensive drugs administered in physicians’ offices or hospitals. In Medicare, for example, retail prescription drugs represent 13% of overall spending while drugs administered mainly by physicians add an additional 6%.
According to a Health Affairs Blog post from May 2016, one of the primary drivers of high drug costs is specialty drugs. Because of their extremely high costs, specialty drugs account for a disproportionate share of overall drug spending and have a corresponding effect on spending growth. In fact, spending on specialty medicines was responsible for 73% of overall medicine spending growth over the past five years. The prices of specialty drugs are also growing dramatically. For example, the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center reported that the median launch price of new cancer agents doubled in the last decade, from $4,500 per month to more than $10,000 per month. Similarly, the launch prices of new multiple sclerosis drugs increased from $8,000 to $12,000 per year in the 1990s to $50,000 to $65,000 per year today. Specialty drugs also often experience substantial price growth every year they are on the market. For example, the AARP Public Policy Institute’s December 2016 Rx Price Watch report found that the retail prices of specialty drugs widely used by older Americans increased by almost 11% in 2013. Hefty increases are not limited to specialty drugs; prices for drugs that have been on the market for decades have also seen inexplicable increases. For example, over the past 20 years, the price of human insulin produced by two major manufacturers – Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk – rose 450% after accounting for inflation, according to a 2016 Washington Post analysis of data from Truven Health Analytics. A single 10-milliliter vial of Eli Lilly’s Humalog insulin, which is less than a month’s supply for many adults, was listed at $254.80 last year, compared with $20.82 in 1996.
- Drug pricing. Federal regulations prohibit the U.S. government from setting the price of pharmaceuticals, and patents on drugs, in effect, prohibit competition, at least initially. Countries without these restrictions generally buy drugs for a fraction of the U.S. price. Pharmaceutical companies argue that high drug prices are justified because of the enormous cost and risk associated with bringing a drug to market and that payment for current drugs fund future innovation. Developing a new drug costs an average of $1.2 billion and takes 10 to 15 years. When a new drug provides a cure for a disease, as opposed to only treating symptoms, drug companies claim that a high upfront cost is mitigated by not having to treat symptoms indefinitely. However, critics point to numerous examples of drug companies charging high prices for drugs with only marginal improvements over cheaper alternatives, or astounding increases in pricing for drugs that have been on the market for years.
- Price Benchmarks. Knowing how much a drug costs is difficult; there are many different prices for each drug and different ways of expressing those prices. In the US, the two most common ways of stating drug prices are the WAC and average wholesale price (AWP). Neither one, though, is the actual price paid by a payer, nor are they what their names imply. Rather, they're standardized ways of expressing a price, thus allowing comparisons to be made from one drug to another. AWP is a benchmark that has been used for over 40 years for pricing and reimbursement of prescription drugs for both government and private payers. Initially, the AWP was intended to represent the average price that wholesalers used to sell medications to providers, such as physicians, pharmacies, and other customers. However, the AWP is not a true representation of actual market prices for either generic or brand drug products. AWP has often been compared to the “list price” or “sticker price,” meaning it is an elevated drug price that is rarely what is actually paid. AWP is not a government-regulated figure, does not include buyer volume discounts or rebates often involved in prescription drug sales. As such, the AWP, while used throughout the industry, is a controversial pricing benchmark.
The WAC price of a drug on the market, as originally announced by the company is also rarely the price paid by a payer. The actual price paid by any one payer is proprietary information, complicating discussions of value and cost to consumers. Drug companies negotiate with payers – Medicare, Medicaid, insurers, and PBMs – to set an initial gross sales price. Drug manufacturers pay rebates back to government entities, creating a difference between gross sales for a drug and net sales. The rebates are not publicly available, and vary highly among payers and for different drugs. Estimates put them between 2% for innovative new drugs and up to 60% for drugs that have several competitors or generics on the market.
Federal law requires manufacturers to provide rebates to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and state Medicaid agencies. The program requires a drug manufacturer to enter into, and have in effect, a national rebate agreement with the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in exchange for state Medicaid coverage of most of the manufacturer’s drugs. These rebates are paid by drug manufacturers on a quarterly basis to states and are shared between the states and the federal government to offset the overall cost of prescription drugs under the Medicaid program. According to DHCS, drug manufacturers are required to pay a Medi-Cal rebate for all outpatient drugs that are dispensed and paid for by the Medi-Cal program. In addition, some manufacturers have agreed to pay supplemental Medi-Cal rebates above the standard rebate. Federal law requires rebates for prescriptions offered through the AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP), in part because of the high cost of HIV/AIDS medications. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, drug manufacturer rebates account for 40% of the annual ADAP budget.
- Impact on state finances. Medi-Cal provides health care coverage for nearly one-third of Californians. Combined with CalPERS, ADAP, state hospitals, and corrections, taxpayer liability for increasing drug costs is significant. For example, according to a December 2015 report published by the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance, Medi-Cal’s fee-for-service system alone spent nearly $25 million treating roughly 340 patients with Sovaldi and Harvoni in 2014. However, Medi-Cal fee-for-service is only a fraction of the Medi-Cal population. Private health plans invoiced the state an additional $387.5 million for Sovaldi and Harvoni treatments for Medi-Cal managed care enrollees between July 2014 and November 2015 (for 3,624 patients) according to DHCS. Additionally, as a direct result of Sovaldi and Harvoni pricing, the 2015-16 California state budget allocated $228 million just for high cost drugs to DHCS and CDCR. In December 2015, it was reported that CalPERS spent $438 million on specialty drugs, an increase of 32% from the previous year. This represents one quarter of the total drug costs paid by CalPERS, while only 1% of the prescriptions filled.
- Related legislation. SB 790 (McGuire) would prohibit a drug manufacturer or a wholesaler from offering or giving a gift, as defined, to a health care provider. Prohibits a drug manufacturer or an entity on behalf of a drug manufacturer from providing a fee, payment, subsidy, or other economic benefit to a health care provider in connection with the provider’s participation in research, with some exceptions. Authorizes the Attorney General to bring an action to enforce a violation of these provisions and to seek injunctive relief and imposition of a civil penalty for each violation, as specified. Requires a health care professional, as defined, who is a member of a committee that sets formularies or develops clinical guidelines and who also serves as a speaker or commercial consultant for a drug manufacturer to disclose to the committee his or her relationship with the manufacturer, as specified. SB 790 is set to be heard in the Senate Health Committee on April 26, 2017.
AB 265 (Wood) would prohibit, with some exceptions, prescription drug manufacturers from offering any discount, repayment, product voucher, or other reduction in an individual’s out-of-pocket expenses associated with his or her insurance coverage, including, but not limited to, a copayment or deductible, for any prescription drug if a lower cost brand name or non-brand name prescription drug is available that is designated as therapeutically equivalent to, or interchangeable with, the prescription drug. AB 265 is pending in the Assembly Health Committee.
- Prior legislation. SB 1010 (Hernandez, 2016) was substantially similar to this bill. SB 1010 was placed on the inactive file on the Assembly Floor.
AB 2436 (Roger Hernández, of 2016) would have required carriers to provide at the time that a prescription drug is delivered or within 30 days of purchase, specified information related to the cost of the prescription drug. AB 2436 failed passage on the Assembly Floor.
AB 2711 (Chiu, of 2016) would have reinstated a previously repealed requirement for the Department of General Services to report to the Legislature on its prescription drug bulk purchasing program. AB 2711 was held on the Assembly Appropriations Committee suspense file.
AB 463 (Chiu, of 2015) would have required pharmaceutical companies to file an annual report with OSHPD containing specified information regarding the development and pricing of prescription drugs. Hearing canceled at the request of author in the Assembly Health Committee.
- Support. According to the California Labor Federation (CLF), a cosponsor of this bill, Congress has investigated a number of arbitrary and outrageous drug price increases over the past year—from Sovaldi to Epipens and insulin. The Congressional reports detail how many price increases for drugs have little relation to improvements in the effectiveness of the drug or to the cost of research and development (R&D). Many price increases, such Mylan’s steady upward trend for Epipen, were seemingly arbitrary. Others, such as insulin drugs, showed a pattern of three companies raising prices in lock-step. A U.S. Senate Finance Committee report found that the launch price of a drug like Sovaldi, to treat Hepatitis C, was set to maximize revenue and ensure an even higher launch price for the company’s second Hepatitis C drug, Harvoni, which was in the pipeline. Drug companies argue that the costs of R&D for new medications justify the high prices. However, half of the new drugs approved in the U.S. from 1998 to 2007 resulted from research at universities and biotech firms, not drug companies. Drug companies spend 19 times as much on marketing for drugs than they do on R&D. In other cases, companies buy old drugs and raise prices as a profit driven business decision. According to Health Access California (HAC), a cosponsor of this bill, advance notice is routine in health care: health plans and insurers provide purchasers 60 days advance notice of rate increases; Covered California and other health plans offering coverage in the individual market provide six months advance notice of rate increases through the rate review process; and, hospitals are required to provide 75 days advance notice of a contract termination. Advance notice of 90 days gives purchasers, both public and private, time to adjust formularies, to negotiate price concessions, and to seek other alternatives, including obtaining alternative formulations of drugs for which there are therapeutic equivalents. Many purchasers have drug formulary committees that meet quarterly to review the drug formulary: while some would prefer longer notice, at least 90 days’ notice allows time to adjust to price hikes. Kaiser Permanente (KP) contends that among the greatest threats to the affordability of health care coverage is the pharmaceutical industry’s pricing of new and existing medication. KP states that the exorbitant prices of these important medications are leading to circumstances where consumers are having to shoulder a greater share of the burden of the overall cost of the drug, and public health may be jeopardized when treatments are out of reach because of their costs. The California Association of Health Plans states that rising prescription drug prices have been cited as a major driver of premium increases for CalPERS and Covered California, and six-figure price tags for new treatments and thousand-percent price hikes on decades-old medications are becoming the new normal, but no one really understands why this trend is so pervasive because there is no sunlight on how pharmaceutical companies price their products. Blue Shield of California writes that this bill takes an important step toward achieving prescription drug price transparency, by requiring for the first time that the drug manufacturers take some level of responsibility for the impact of drug costs and their incessant price increases have on the affordability of health care. Epilepsy California writes that this bill assures that individuals with epilepsy will be provided greater transparency on prescription drug costs, and such assistance will assist both patients and their physicians in accessing appropriate drug therapy plans which will better control seizures. Epilepsy California states that shining a light on the costs of prescription drugs is a first step in reducing drug costs and saving the lives of 360,000 Californians with epilepsy. National Multiple Sclerosis Society writes that this bill is a good starting point and will be an important tool to help educate consumers about their prescription drug related expenses because lack of public information on price increases contributes to the burden of living with a chronic condition like MS. Western Center on Law and Poverty states that many consumers, particularly the low-income consumers they serve, have a hard time affording their co-pays and other drug costs, and as a result many people are forced to skip prescriptions, cut pills in half, or go without necessary care as a result of higher and higher drug costs. Pacific Business Group on Health (PBGH) and Silicon Valley Employers Forum (SVEF) write last year, their members spent more than $12 billion dollars providing coverage to over three million California employees, retirees, and dependents. A significant—but ultimately unknown—proportion of this $12 billion can be directly attributed to the high and rising cost of pharmaceutical drugs. While retail and mail order medication filled through a separate pharmacy benefit comprise between 20 to 25% of health care spending for a typical PBGH or SVEF member, total drug costs are actually much higher given that many are administered in hospitals and clinics and paid for under an employee’s medical benefit. More information on the most expensive and frequently utilized drugs is needed for public and private stakeholders trying to determine and implement value-based purchasing and policy strategies. The Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce writes that California has made significant gains in reducing our state’s number of uninsured over the past several years, but to sustain this progress we must address affordability and the underlying costs that impact the price of coverage and this bill is a move toward transparency that can help further discussions over how we can address prices in the long term. Tenet Healthcare writes that this bill and its notification and other requirements would help to provide a new level of pragmatic transparency in a critical health care sector, and that the disclosures under this bill will begin to provide some much needed checks and balances for ongoing pharmaceutical cost trends, as well as important and overdue accountability.
- Oppose unless amended. The Association for Accessible Medicines (AAM) writes that the generic industry’s business model is similar to a commodities market where prices- sometimes at pennies a dose- fluctuate up and down regularly, and so under this bill, a generic drug could easily trigger this threshold numerous times, not because of rising drug prices, but because of normal business practices of the marketplace. AAM states that there is a genuine concern that when faced with this potential regulatory burden, a company would find it much easier to exit a market rather than dedicate resources to justify their pricing, and transparency legislation is a sure way to accomplish the opposite of what its authors intend. AAM believes that products below a certain cost should not be included and the legislation must allow for the differences between the brand and generics market when it comes to calculating increases and complying with the regulatory requirements.
- Opposition. The Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) writes that while this bill does not enact direct price caps on biopharmaceuticals, the bill is intended to impose a form of price control as the pre-notice and other reporting requirements are meant to discourage excessive price increases. BIO states that this “deterrent” would be imposed on nearly every manufacturer of innovative biopharmaceutical therapies because the reporting threshold for medications that cost over $670 per month is 10% over three years, or an average of 3.33% per year, which is less than the medical CPI. BIO contends that this bill requires manufacturers to report marketing and pricing plans used in the launch of new drugs, specific factors used in determining price increase decisions, and acquisition prices of specific products, and they consider much of this information trade secrets and oppose requirements to publicly report information that will harm their members’ ability to compete with other manufacturers and effectively negotiate with purchasers. BIO is also concerned that the advance notice provisions in this bill would have serious unintended consequences for the drug supply chain because the substantial advanced notice would provide enough time for wholesalers, hospitals, pharmacies, large provider networks, and buying groups to engage in stockpiling activity in advance of a price increase, which would disrupt the availability of medicines not only in California, but nationwide. The California Life Sciences Association (CLSA) asserts that this bill would create an incomplete and misleading picture of drug costs, and further from understanding drug costs in California and would also impose millions in new administrative costs, despite providing no meaningful benefits. CLSA states that this bill focuses almost entirely on prices and spending, which is not necessarily the same as cost, as cost should explicitly factor in offsets (e.g., rebates, discounts, and other price concessions, as well as other costs avoided). CLSA writes that looking outside of this bill for meaningful PBM information, which one must do, we grow increasingly concerned that there is not more alignment on recognizing PBMs’ central role as legislative efforts move forward with a stated intent to achieve a better understanding of drug costs, and that the information required of biopharmaceutical companies, health plans, and insurers would create a highly inaccurate picture of how medicines affect overall healthcare costs, particularly in the absence of any cost information from PBMs. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) writes that requiring price notifications from manufacturers will not benefit patients, because access to care is primarily driven by insurance coverage and benefit design, and due to that benefit design, consumers’ cost sharing for prescription medicines is disproportionately high relative to their cost share for other services. PhRMA states that patients pay for about 20% of their prescription drugs costs out-of-pocket compared to just 5% of their hospital costs and 15% of their overall health care costs. PhRMA contends that high cost sharing is associated with lower adherence to medicines, which can lead to poor health outcomes for patients and increased use of other medical services.
- Amendments. The author has asked the Committee to approve the following amendments:
- On page 4, delete lines 11-16 and replace with:
(f) Except for the report required pursuant to subdivision (b), the department shall keep confidential all of the information provided to the department pursuant to this section, and the information shall be protected from public disclosure.
- On page 10, line 30, delete “of” and insert “after FDA approval”
- On page 10, line 34, delete “Within 30 days of” and insert “No later than 30 days after”
SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION:
Support: California Labor Federation (co-sponsor)
Health Access California (co-sponsor)
AARP
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO
America’s Health Insurance Plans
Anthem Blue Cross
Asian Law Alliance
Association of California Life and Health Insurance Companies
Blue Shield of California
California Alliance for Retired Americans
California Association of Health Plans
California Black Health Network
California Conference Board of the Amalgamated Transit Union
California Conference of Machinists
California Hospital Association
California Immigrant Policy Center
California Medical Association
California Nurses Association/ National Nurses United
California Optometric Association
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network
California Physicians Alliance
California Professional Firefighters
California Retired Teachers Association
California School Employees Association
California State Retirees
California Teachers Association
CALPIRG
Carson Chamber of Commerce
Children Now
City and County of San Francisco
Congress of California Seniors
Consumer Federation of California
Consumers Union
Engineers and Scientists of California, IFPTE Local 20
Epilepsy California
Fresno Chamber of Commerce
Greater Conejo Valley Chamber of Commerce
IATSE Local 80
International Longshore and Warehouse Union
Irwindale Chamber of Commerce
J. Glynn & Company
Justice in Aging
Kaiser Permanente
LIUNA Locals 777 & 792
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce
Los Angeles County Professional Peace Officers Association
Molina Healthcare
Montebello Chamber of Commerce
National Health Law Program
National Multiple Sclerosis Society
NextGen Climate
Orange County Professional Firefighters Association, Local 3631
Pacific Business Group on Health
Pasadena Chamber of Commerce & Civic Association
Personal Assistance Services Council
Professional & Technical Engineers, Local 21, AFL-CIO
Project Inform
San Gabriel Valley Chamber of Commerce
SEIU California
Silicon Valley Employers Forum
The Silicon Valley Organization
Tenet Healthcare
United Food and Commercial Workers
UNITE HERE
United Nurses Associations of California/Union of Health Care Professionals
Utility Workers Union of America, Local 132
Western Center on Law & Poverty
Oppose: Association for Accessible Medicines (unless amended)
Biocom
Biotechnology Innovation Organization
California Life Sciences Association
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
-- END --
Discussed in Hearing
Senate Floor
Assembly Floor
Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
Assembly Standing Committee on Health
Senate Floor
Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
Senate Standing Committee on Health
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):