Bills

SB 63: Unlawful employment practice: parental leave.

  • Session Year: 2017-2018
  • House: Senate
Version:

Existing law, the Moore-Brown-Roberti Family Rights Act, or California Family Rights Act (CFRA), makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer, as defined, to refuse to grant a request by an eligible employee to take up to 12 workweeks of unpaid protected leave during any 12-month period (1) for reason of a child born to, adopted by, or placed for foster care with, the employee, (2) to care for the employees parent or spouse who has a serious health condition, as defined, or (3) because the employee is suffering from a serious health condition rendering him or her unable to perform the functions of the job.

Existing law prohibits an employer from refusing to allow a female employee disabled by pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition to take a leave for a reasonable time of up to 4 months before returning to work. Existing law also prohibits an employer from refusing to maintain and pay for coverage under a group health plan for an employee who takes that leave, as specified.

This bill would prohibit an employer, as defined, from refusing to allow an employee with more than 12 months of service with the employer, who has at least 1,250 hours of service with the employer during the previous 12-month period, and who works at a worksite in which the employer employs at least 20 employees within 75 miles, to take up to 12 weeks of parental leave to bond with a new child within one year of the childs birth, adoption, or foster care placement. The bill would also prohibit an employer from refusing to maintain and pay for coverage under a group health plan for an employee who takes this leave. The bill would allow the employer to recover coverage costs under specific circumstances. The bill would provide that it would not apply to an employee who is subject to both specified state law regarding family care and medical leave, and the federal Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. Under the bill, if the employer employs both parents and they are entitled to leave pursuant to this bill for the same birth, adoption, or foster care placement, the parents mandated parental leave would be capped at the amount granted to an employee by the bill. The bill would authorize the employer to grant simultaneous leave to these parents.

This bill would also prohibit an employer from refusing to hire, or from discharging, fining, suspending, expelling, or discriminating against, an individual for exercising the right to parental leave provided by this bill or giving information or testimony as to his or her own parental leave, or another persons parental leave, in an inquiry or proceeding related to rights guaranteed under this bill.

The bill would additionally prohibit an employer from interfering with, restraining, or denying the exercise of, or the attempt to exercise, any right provided under this bill.

The bill would require the Fair Employment and Housing Council, to the extent that state regulations interpreting CFRA are within the scope of, and not inconsistent with the bill or with other state law, to incorporate those regulations by reference to govern leave under the bill.

Under existing law, the Department of Fair Employment and Housing is authorized to provide mediation services to parties involved in actions under its jurisdiction.

This bill, until January 1, 2020, would require the Department of Fair Employment and Housing, upon receiving funding from the Legislature, to create a parental leave mediation pilot program, as specified. Under the pilot program, within 60 days of receipt of a right-to-sue notice, an employer may request all parties to participate in the departments Mediation Division Program. If the employer makes such a request, the bill would prohibit an employee from pursuing any civil action under these provisions until the mediation is complete, as defined, which would include an employees election not to participate in mediation. The bill would provide that the employees statute of limitations would be tolled during the course of the mediation, as specified.

Discussed in Hearing

Senate Floor6MIN
Sep 13, 2017

Senate Floor

Assembly Floor16MIN
Sep 12, 2017

Assembly Floor

Assembly Floor39SEC
Sep 8, 2017

Assembly Floor

Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations1H
Sep 1, 2017

Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations

Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations16MIN
Jul 19, 2017

Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations

Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary24MIN
Jun 27, 2017

Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary

Assembly Standing Committee on Labor and Employment35MIN
Jun 21, 2017

Assembly Standing Committee on Labor and Employment

Senate Floor21MIN
May 30, 2017

Senate Floor

View Older Hearings

News Coverage:

SB 63: Unlawful employment practice: parental leave. | Digital Democracy