AB 1323: Alcoholic beverage control: tied-house exceptions.
- Session Year: 2021-2022
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2022-09-13
Existing law, the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, generally prohibits a manufacturer, winegrower, distiller, bottler, or wholesaler, among other licensees, or agents of these licensees, from paying a retailer for advertising. Existing law creates a variety of exceptions from this prohibition, including permitting specified alcoholic beverage licensees to purchase advertising space and time in connection with a special on-sale retail licensed premises that is a historic theater located in the City and County of San Francisco that meets specified conditions. Among those conditions is that the premises be configured with theatrical seating of at least 2,100 seats.
This bill would reduce the minimum required theatrical seating for purposes of this provision to 1,600.
Existing law, the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, generally prohibits a manufacturer, winegrower, distiller, bottler, or wholesaler, among other licensees, or agents of these licensees, from paying a retailer for advertising. Existing law creates a variety of exceptions from this prohibition, including permitting specified alcoholic beverage licensees to purchase advertising space and time in connection with a special on-sale retail licensed premises that is a historic theater located in the City and County of San Francisco that meets specified conditions. Among those conditions is that the premises be configured with theatrical seating of at least 2,100 seats.
This bill would reduce the minimum required theatrical seating for purposes of this provision to 1,600.
Existing law, the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, generally prohibits a manufacturer, winegrower, distiller, bottler, or wholesaler, among other licensees, or agents of these licensees, from paying a retailer for advertising. Existing law creates a variety of exceptions from this prohibition, including permitting specified alcoholic beverage licensees to purchase advertising space and time in connection with a special on-sale retail licensed premises that is a historic theater located in the City and County of San Francisco that meets specified conditions. Among those conditions is that the premises be configured with theatrical seating of at least 2,100 seats.
This bill would reduce the minimum required theatrical seating for purposes of this provision to 1,600.
Existing law establishes, within the Government Operations Agency, the Department of Technology under the supervision of the Director of Technology, who also serves as the State Chief Information Officer. Under existing law, the Department of Technology is responsible for the approval and oversight of information technology projects, as specified. Existing law requires the chief information officer of each state agency to develop the enterprise architecture for their agency to rationalize, standardize, and consolidate information technology applications, assets, infrastructure, data, and procedures for the agency. Existing law subjects each chief information officers enterprise architecture to the review and approval of the Department of Technology. Existing law requires that a state agency service contract, which would otherwise not be reviewed by the Department of Technology, be subject to review, approval, and oversight by the department if the contract contains an information technology component that would be subject to oversight by the department if it were a separate information technology project. This bill would require the Department of Technology to identify, assess, and prioritize legacy information technology system modernization efforts across state government. The bill would require state agencies and state entities, as defined, to submit their information technology service contracts to the Department of Technology before May 1, 2022. The bill would require the department to use this information for specified purposes, including analyzing state information technology investment in order to identify types of uses that are candidates for statewide contracts for commonly used or shared services. The bill would also require the Department of Technology and other state agencies and state entities to work with legislative staff and the Legislative Analysts Office to evaluate potential options to modernize state government information technology project approval and oversight processes. In this regard, the bill would require the Department of Technology to submit various reports to the Legislature, as specified.Existing law establishes, within the Government Operations Agency, the Department of Technology under the supervision of the Director of Technology, who also serves as the State Chief Information Officer. Under existing law, the Department of Technology is responsible for the approval and oversight of information technology projects, as specified. Existing law requires the chief information officer of each state agency to develop the enterprise architecture for their agency to rationalize, standardize, and consolidate information technology applications, assets, infrastructure, data, and procedures for the agency. Existing law subjects each chief information officers enterprise architecture to the review and approval of the Department of Technology. Existing law requires that a state agency service contract, which would otherwise not be reviewed by the Department of Technology, be subject to review, approval, and oversight by the department if the contract contains an information technology component that would be subject to oversight by the department if it was were a separate information technology project.
This bill would require the Department of Technology to identify, assess, and prioritize legacy information technology system modernization efforts across state government. The bill would require state agencies and state entities, as defined, to submit their information technology service contracts to the Department of Technology before May 1, 2022. The bill would require the department to use this information for specified purposes, including analyzing state information technology investment in order to identify types of uses that are candidates for statewide contracts for commonly used or shared services, and would make related legislative findings and declarations. services. The bill would also require the Department of Technology and other state agencies and state entities to work with legislative staff and the Legislative Analysts Office to evaluate potential options to modernize state government information technology project approval and oversight processes. In this regard, the bill would require the Department of Technology to submit various reports to the Legislature, as specified.
Existing law establishes, within the Government Operations Agency, the Department of Technology under the supervision of the Director of Technology, who also serves as the State Chief Information Officer. Existing law requires that a state agency service contract, which would otherwise not be reviewed by the Department of Technology, be subject to review, approval, and oversight by the department if the contract contains an information technology component that would be subject to oversight by the department if it was a separate information technology project.
This bill would require state agencies and state entities, as defined, to submit their information technology service contracts to the Department of Technology before May 1, 2022. The bill would require the department to use this information for specified purposes, including analyzing state information technology investment in order to identify types of uses that are candidates for statewide contracts for commonly used or shared services, and would make related legislative findings and declarations.
Existing law establishes the Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank within the Governors Office of Business and Economic Development. Existing law authorizes the bank to finance a project for the financing of transition costs and the acquisition of transition property upon the request of an electrical company.This bill would make nonsubstantive changes to that provision.Existing law establishes the Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank within the Governors Office of Business and Economic Development. Existing law authorizes the bank to finance a project for the financing of transition costs and the acquisition of transition property upon the request of an electrical company.
This bill would make nonsubstantive changes to that provision.
(a)Notwithstanding Sections 25500 and 25503, a beer manufacturer, winegrower, rectifier, distilled spirits manufacturer, craft distiller, or a distilled spirits manufacturers agent may purchase advertising space and time in connection with a special on-sale retail licensed premises, if all of the following conditions are met:
(1)The on-sale retail licensed premises is a for-profit theater licensed with a special on-sale general license pursuant to Section 24045.75.
(2)The on-sale retail licensed premises is configured with theatrical seating of at least 1,600 seats but no more than 2,400 seats.
(3)The on-sale retail licensed premises is a historic theater that is located in the City and County of San Francisco, that was built prior to 1927, and that is either within a historic district as designated by the National Register of Historic Places or is designated as a Landmark by the San Francisco Historic Preservation Commission.
(4)All payments for the purchase of advertising space and time shall be made pursuant to a written contract with the owner of the theater, the licensee, or the long-term tenant, as appropriate.
(5)No agreement for advertising authorized by this section shall be contingent upon or otherwise require, directly or indirectly, implicitly or explicitly, the retail licensee to purchase or sell any alcoholic beverages or other products produced, manufactured, imported, distributed, or otherwise represented by the purchaser of the advertising space and time. The special on-sale general licensee shall offer for sale, in a bona fide manner, alcoholic beverages manufactured, produced, or distributed by competing licensed beer manufacturers, winegrowers, rectifiers, distilled spirits manufacturers, craft distillers, or distilled spirits manufacturers agents.
(6)Advertising space and time purchased pursuant to this section may be included in printed programs for specific theatrical performances and in announcements made during the theatrical performances, as well as any internet, social media, or other media promotion of the specific theatrical performance. The advertising may also be placed on or in the special on-sale general licensed premises.
(b)The Legislature finds that it is necessary and proper to require a separation between manufacturing interests, wholesale interests, and retail interests in the production and distribution of alcoholic beverages in order to prevent suppliers from dominating local markets through vertical integration and to prevent excessive sales of alcoholic beverages produced by overly aggressive marketing techniques. The Legislature further finds that the exceptions established by this section to the general prohibition against tied interests must be limited to their express terms so as not to undermine the general prohibition, and intends that this section be construed accordingly.
(a)Notwithstanding Sections 25500 and 25503, a beer manufacturer, winegrower, rectifier, distilled spirits manufacturer, craft distiller, or a distilled spirits manufacturers agent may purchase advertising space and time in connection with a special on-sale retail licensed premises, if all of the following conditions are met:
(1)The on-sale retail licensed premises is a for-profit theater licensed with a special on-sale general license pursuant to Section 24045.75.
(2)The on-sale retail licensed premises is configured with theatrical seating of at least 1,600 seats but no more than 2,400 seats.
(3)The on-sale retail licensed premises is a historic theater that is located in the City and County of San Francisco, that was built prior to 1927, and that is either within a historic district as designated by the National Register of Historic Places or is designated as a Landmark by the San Francisco Historic Preservation Commission.
(4)All payments for the purchase of advertising space and time shall be made pursuant to a written contract with the owner of the theater, the licensee, or the long-term tenant, as appropriate.
(5)No agreement for advertising authorized by this section shall be contingent upon or otherwise require, directly or indirectly, implicitly or explicitly, the retail licensee to purchase or sell any alcoholic beverages or other products produced, manufactured, imported, distributed, or otherwise represented by the purchaser of the advertising space and time. The special on-sale general licensee shall offer for sale, in a bona fide manner, alcoholic beverages manufactured, produced, or distributed by competing licensed beer manufacturers, winegrowers, rectifiers, distilled spirits manufacturers, craft distillers, or distilled spirits manufacturers agents.
(6)Advertising space and time purchased pursuant to this section may be included in printed programs for specific theatrical performances and in announcements made during the theatrical performances, as well as any internet, social media, or other media promotion of the specific theatrical performance. The advertising may also be placed on or in the special on-sale general licensed premises.
(b)The Legislature finds that it is necessary and proper to require a separation between manufacturing interests, wholesale interests, and retail interests in the production and distribution of alcoholic beverages in order to prevent suppliers from dominating local markets through vertical integration and to prevent excessive sales of alcoholic beverages produced by overly aggressive marketing techniques. The Legislature further finds that the exceptions established by this section to the general prohibition against tied interests must be limited to their express terms so as not to undermine the general prohibition, and intends that this section be construed accordingly.
(a)Notwithstanding Sections 25500 and 25503, a beer manufacturer, winegrower, rectifier, distilled spirits manufacturer, craft distiller, or a distilled spirits manufacturers agent may purchase advertising space and time in connection with a special on-sale retail licensed premises, if all of the following conditions are met:
(1)The on-sale retail licensed premises is a for-profit theater licensed with a special on-sale general license pursuant to Section 24045.75.
(2)The on-sale retail licensed premises is configured with theatrical seating of at least 2,100 1,600 seats but no more than 2,400 seats.
(3)The on-sale retail licensed premises is a historic theater that is located in the City and County of San Francisco, that was built prior to 1927, and that is either within a historic district as designated by the National Register of Historic Places or is designated as a Landmark by the San Francisco Historic Preservation Commission.
(4)All payments for the purchase of advertising space and time shall be made pursuant to a written contract with the owner of the theater, the licensee, or the long-term tenant, as appropriate.
(5)No agreement for advertising authorized by this section shall be contingent upon or otherwise require, directly or indirectly, implicitly or explicitly, the retail licensee to purchase or sell any alcoholic beverages or other products produced, manufactured, imported, distributed, or otherwise represented by the purchaser of the advertising space and time. The special on-sale general licensee shall offer for sale, in a bona fide manner, alcoholic beverages manufactured, produced, or distributed by competing licensed beer manufacturers, winegrowers, rectifiers, distilled spirits manufacturers, craft distillers, or distilled spirits manufacturers agents.
(6)Advertising space and time purchased pursuant to this section may be included in printed programs for specific theatrical performances and in announcements made during the theatrical performances, as well as any internet, social media, or other media promotion of the specific theatrical performance. The advertising may also be placed on or in the special on-sale general licensed premises.
(b)The Legislature finds that it is necessary and proper to require a separation between manufacturing interests, wholesale interests, and retail interests in the production and distribution of alcoholic beverages in order to prevent suppliers from dominating local markets through vertical integration and to prevent excessive sales of alcoholic beverages produced by overly aggressive marketing techniques. The Legislature further finds that the exceptions established by this section to the general prohibition against tied interests must be limited to their express terms so as not to undermine the general prohibition, and intends that this section be construed accordingly.
SECTION 1.The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a)It is imperative for the state to create a seamless experience for Californians accessing its public services that, at a minimum, begins to mirror the convenience and simplicity of the experience in the private sector and the improvements made there in the last decade.(b)The state must accelerate the move toward common platforms and shared services, embrace user-centered design, and leverage technology in order to transform government processes and operations.(c)A centralized information technology experience will address decades of policy inadequacies by establishing more useful modern standards and will enable the state to use spend analytics to drive better statewide technology investment decisionmaking in line with those updated standards.(d)The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the state budget further illustrates the need for efficiency in order to ensure that the state may effectively leverage its purchasing power and get the best value for the money that it invests in technology.SEC. 2.Section 11546.45 is added to the Government Code, immediately following Section 11546.4, to read:11546.45.(a)(1)The Department of Technology shall identify, assess, and prioritize legacy information technology system modernization efforts across state government.(2)The Department of Technology shall submit an annual report to the Legislature that includes all of the following:(A)An explanation of how the Department of Technology is prioritizing legacy information technology system modernization efforts across state government.(B)An estimate of annual and total preliminary costs for each effort and for the entire state modernization portfolio.(C)The impediments and risks that could, or issues that already have, led to changes in how the Department of Technology identifies, assesses, and prioritizes modernization efforts. (b)(1)Nothwithstanding any other law, all state agencies and state entities shall submit all of their current information technology service contracts to the Department of Technology before May 1, 2022.(2)The Department of Technology shall analyze the contracts submitted and use the information obtained from that analysis for all of the following purposes:(A)To assess state information technology investment in order to identify types of uses that are candidates for statewide contracts for commonly used or shared services.(B)To create a replicable analytic approach to better understand user demand.(C)To inform management approaches regarding demand and supply.(3)After completing the analysis, the Department of Technology shall submit a report to the Legislature that does all of the following:(A)Identifies each service that the Department of Technology believes would be appropriately centralized.(B)Summarizes market research the department would conduct to estimate the one-time and ongoing costs to the state of each service.(C)Calculates potential offsetting savings to the state from reduced overlap and redundancy of services.(4)After submitting the report, the Department of Technology shall develop an implementation plan, including any associated budget requests. The plan may include, but is not limited to, a list of existing service contracts of state agencies and state entities to be replaced with centralized service contracts managed by the Department of Technology and a proposed strategy and timeline for the transition from existing service contracts to centralized service contracts.(c)(1)The Department of Technology, the Department of Finance, the Government Operations Agency, and other relevant state agencies and state entities shall work with legislative staff and the Legislative Analysts Office to evaluate potential options to modernize state government information technology project approval and oversight processes.(2)The Department of Technology shall submit a report to the Legislature that summarizes the options evaluated, explains the options selected, and provides recommendations for further action.(d)A report to be submitted pursuant to this section shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(e)For purposes of this section, the terms state agency and state entity shall have the same meanings as in subdivision (e) of Section 11546.1.The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)It is imperative for the state to create a seamless experience for Californians accessing its public services that, at a minimum, begins to mirror the convenience and simplicity of the experience in the private sector and the improvements made there in the last decade.
(b)The state must accelerate the move toward common platforms and shared services, embrace user-centered design, and leverage technology in order to transform government processes and operations.
(c)A centralized information technology experience will address decades of policy inadequacies by establishing more useful modern standards and will enable the state to use spend analytics to drive better statewide technology investment decisionmaking in line with those updated standards.
(d)The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the state budget further illustrates the need for efficiency in order to ensure that the state may effectively leverage its purchasing power and get the best value for the money that it invests in technology.
SEC. 2.Section 11546.45 is added to the Government Code, immediately following Section 11546.4, to read:11546.45.(a)Notwithstanding any (1)The Department of Technology shall identify, assess, and prioritize legacy information technology system modernization efforts across state government.
(2)The Department of Technology shall submit an annual report to the Legislature that includes all of the following:
(A)An explanation of how the Department of Technology is prioritizing legacy information technology system modernization efforts across state government.
(B)An estimate of annual and total preliminary costs for each effort and for the entire state modernization portfolio.
(C)The impediments and risks that could, or issues that already have, led to changes in how the Department of Technology identifies, assesses, and prioritizes modernization efforts.
(b)(1)Nothwithstanding any other law, all state agencies and state entities as in defined subdivision (e) of Section 11546.1 shall submit all of their current information technology service contracts to the Department of Technology before May 1, 2022.
(b)(2)The Department of Technology shall analyze the contracts submitted and use the information obtained from that analysis for all of the following purposes:
(1)(A)To assess state information technology investment in order to identify types of uses that are candidates for statewide contracts for commonly used or shared services.
(2)(B)To create a replicable analytic approach to better understand user demand.
(3)(C)To inform management approaches regarding demand and supply.
(3)After completing the analysis, the Department of Technology shall submit a report to the Legislature that does all of the following:
(A)Identifies each service that the Department of Technology believes would be appropriately centralized.
(B)Summarizes market research the department would conduct to estimate the one-time and ongoing costs to the state of each service.
(C)Calculates potential offsetting savings to the state from reduced overlap and redundancy of services.
(4)After submitting the report, the Department of Technology shall develop an implementation plan, including any associated budget requests. The plan may include, but is not limited to, a list of existing service contracts of state agencies and state entities to be replaced with centralized service contracts managed by the Department of Technology and a proposed strategy and timeline for the transition from existing service contracts to centralized service contracts.
(c)(1)The Department of Technology, the Department of Finance, the Government Operations Agency, and other relevant state agencies and state entities shall work with legislative staff and the Legislative Analysts Office to evaluate potential options to modernize state government information technology project approval and oversight processes.
(2)The Department of Technology shall submit a report to the Legislature that summarizes the options evaluated, explains the options selected, and provides recommendations for further action.
(d)A report to be submitted pursuant to this section shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.
(e)For purposes of this section, the terms state agency and state entity shall have the same meanings as in subdivision (e) of Section 11546.1.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)It is imperative for the state to create a seamless experience for Californians accessing its public services that, at a minimum, begins to mirror the convenience and simplicity of the experience in the private sector and the improvements made there in the last decade.
(b)The state must accelerate the move toward common platforms and shared services, embrace user-centered design, and leverage technology in order to transform government processes and operations.
(c)A centralized information technology experience will address decades of policy inadequacies by establishing more useful modern standards and will enable the state to use spend analytics to drive better statewide technology investment decisionmaking in line with those updated standards.
(d)The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the state budget further illustrates the need for efficiency in order to ensure that the state may effectively leverage its purchasing power and get the best value for the money that it invests in technology.
SEC. 2.Section 11546.45 is added to the Government Code, immediately following Section 11546.4, to read:11546.45.(a)Notwithstanding any other law, all state agencies and state entities as in defined subdivision (e) of Section 11546.1 shall submit all of their current information technology service contracts to the Department of Technology before May 1, 2022.
(b)The Department of Technology shall analyze the contracts submitted and use the information obtained from that analysis for all of the following purposes:
(1)To assess state information technology investment in order to identify types of uses that are candidates for statewide contracts for commonly used or shared services.
(2)To create a replicable analytic approach to better understand user demand.
(3)To inform management approaches regarding demand and supply.
SECTION 1.Section 63042 of the Government Code is amended to read:63042.Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, a project for the financing of transition costs and the acquisition of transition property upon the request of an electrical corporation shall be deemed to be in the public interest and eligible for financing by the bank, and Article 3 (commencing with Section 63040) and Article 5 (commencing with Section 63043) shall not apply to the project or financing. The bank shall consider a project for financing transition costs and the acquisition of transition property upon filing of an application by an appropriate participating party, on the terms and conditions the bank shall determine. The bank shall establish procedures for the expeditious review of applications from electrical corporations for the issuance or approval of rate reduction bonds. The review may be concurrent with the Public Utilities Commissions processing of an application for the pertinent financing order, so as to allow for the issuance of rate reduction bonds as quickly as feasible after the issuance of the pertinent financing order by the commission. Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, the bank shall not alter or modify any term or condition related to the transition costs or the transition property as set forth in the pertinent financing order, and shall have no authority over any matter that is subject to the approval of the commission under Article 5.5 (commencing with Section 840) of Chapter 4 of Part 1 of Division 1 of the Public Utilities Code.Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, a project for the financing of transition costs and the acquisition of transition property upon the request of an electrical corporation shall be deemed to be in the public interest and eligible for financing by the bank, and Article 3 (commencing with Section 63040) and Article 5 (commencing with Section 63043) shall not apply to the project or financing. The bank shall consider a project for financing transition costs and the acquisition of transition property upon filing of an application by an appropriate participating party, on the terms and conditions the bank shall determine. The bank shall establish procedures for the expeditious review of applications from electrical corporations for the issuance or approval of rate reduction bonds. The review may be concurrent with the Public Utilities Commissions processing of an application for the pertinent financing order, so as to allow for the issuance of rate reduction bonds as quickly as feasible after the issuance of the pertinent financing order by the Public Utilities Commission. commission. Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, the bank shall have no authority to not alter or modify any term or condition related to the transition costs or the transition property as set forth in the pertinent financing order, and shall have no authority over any matter that is subject to the approval of the Public Utilities Commission commission under Article 5.5 (commencing with Section 840) of Chapter 4 of Part 1 of Division 1 of the Public Utilities Code.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2022 | Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 271, Statutes of 2022. |
| Sep 13, 2022 | Approved by the Governor. |
| Sep 7, 2022 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m. |
| Aug 30, 2022 | Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0.). |
| Aug 29, 2022 | From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 21. Noes 0.) (August 29). |
| Aug 18, 2022 | Re-referred to Com. on G.O. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 10 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 4679.). |
| Aug 2, 2022 | Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar. |
| Aug 1, 2022 | From committee: Be ordered to second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to Consent Calendar. |
| Jun 29, 2022 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Jun 23, 2022 | Senate Rule 26 invoked. (Haney). |
| Jun 20, 2022 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on G.O. |
| Jun 9, 2021 | Referred to Com. on G.O. |
| May 28, 2021 | In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. |
| May 28, 2021 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1690.) |
| May 24, 2021 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| May 20, 2021 | From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 20). |
| May 12, 2021 | In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file. |
| Apr 29, 2021 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Apr 8, 2021 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on A. & A.R. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on A. & A.R. |
| Mar 29, 2021 | Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P. |
| Mar 26, 2021 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. Read second time and amended. |
| Mar 23, 2021 | Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P. |
| Mar 22, 2021 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. Read second time and amended. |
| Mar 18, 2021 | Referred to Coms. on P. & C.P. and A. & A.R. |
| Feb 22, 2021 | Read first time. |
| Feb 20, 2021 | From printer. May be heard in committee March 22. |
| Feb 19, 2021 | Introduced. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2022 | AB 1323 Haney Concurrence in Senate Amendments | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Aug 8, 2022 | Consent Calendar AB1323 | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| May 28, 2021 | AB 1323 Chiu Assembly Third Reading | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
Bill Co-Author(s):