AB 2049: Motions for summary judgment: filing deadlines.
- Session Year: 2023-2024
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2024-07-15
Current Status:
Passed
(2024-07-15: Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 99, Statutes of 2024.)
Introduced
In Committee
First Chamber
In Committee
Second Chamber
Enacted
What does this bill do?
The bill changes timing and limits for summary judgment in civil cases: a party must serve a motion for summary judgment (a request to end the case before trial) at least 81 days before the hearing, the other side must file its opposition at least 20 days before, and the moving party must file any reply at least 11 days before. It also generally bars a party from filing more than one summary judgment motion against the same opposing party without court permission and prevents introducing new facts for the first time in a reply.
The summary is provided by generative AI which can make mistakes. For original language, please view the details in the table below.
Existing law requires a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication in a civil action or proceeding to be served and filed at least 75 days before the hearing on the motion. Existing law requires an opposition to the motion to be served and filed at least 14 days before the hearing and a reply to the opposition to be served and filed at least 5 days before the hearing.
This bill would change the deadline for a party to file a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication to at least 81 days before the hearing on the motion. The bill would change the deadlines for filing an opposition to at least 20 days before the hearing and for filing a reply to at least 11 days before the hearing. The bill would prohibit a party from filing more than one motion for summary judgment against an adverse party without leave of court, as specified. The bill would also prohibit the introduction of new facts in a reply to an opposition to a motion for summary judgment, as specified.
Existing law requires a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication in a civil action or proceeding to be served and filed at least 75 days before the hearing on the motion. Existing law requires an opposition to the motion to be served and filed at least 14 days before the hearing and a reply to the opposition to be served and filed at least 5 days before the hearing.
This bill would change the deadline for a party to file a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication to at least 81 days before the hearing on the motion. The bill would change the deadlines for filing an opposition to at least 20 days before the hearing and for filing a reply to at least 11 days before the hearing. The bill would prohibit a party from filing more than one motion for summary judgment against an adverse party without leave of court, as specified. The bill would also prohibit the introduction of new facts in a reply to an opposition to a motion for summary judgment, as specified.
Existing law requires a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication in a civil action or proceeding to be served and filed at least 75 days before the hearing on the motion. Existing law requires an opposition to the motion to be served and filed at least 14 days before the hearing and a reply to the opposition to be served and filed at least 5 days before the hearing.
This bill would change the deadline for a party to file a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication to at least 81 days before the hearing on the motion. The bill would change the deadlines for filing an opposition to at least 20 days before the hearing and for filing a reply to at least 11 days before the hearing. The bill would prohibit a party from filing more than one motion for summary judgment against an adverse party without leave of court, as specified. The bill would also prohibit the introduction of new facts in a reply to an opposition to a motion for summary judgment, as specified.
Existing law requires a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication in a civil action or proceeding to be served and filed at least 75 days before the hearing on the motion. Existing law requires an opposition to the motion to be served and filed at least 14 days before the hearing and a reply to the opposition to be served and filed at least 5 days before the hearing.
This bill would change the deadline for a party to file a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication to at least 81 days before the hearing on the motion. The bill would change the deadlines for filing an opposition to at least 20 days before the hearing and for filing a reply to at least 11 days before the hearing.
(a)(1)A party may move for summary judgment in an action or proceeding if it is contended that the action has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding. The motion may be made at any time after 60 days have elapsed since the general appearance in the action or proceeding of each party against whom the motion is directed or at any earlier time after the general appearance that the court, with or without notice and upon good cause shown, may direct.
(2)Notice of the motion and supporting papers shall be served on all other parties to the action at least 81 days before the time appointed for hearing. If the notice is served by mail, the required 81-day period of notice shall be increased by 5 days if the place of address is within the State of California, 10 days if the place of address is outside the State of California but within the United States, and 20 days if the place of address is outside the United States. If the notice is served by facsimile transmission, express mail, or another method of delivery providing for overnight delivery, the required 81-day period of notice shall be increased by two court days.
(3)The motion shall be heard no later than 30 days before the date of trial, unless the court for good cause orders otherwise. The filing of the motion shall not extend the time within which a party must otherwise file a responsive pleading.
(4)A party shall not bring more than one motion for summary judgment against an adverse party to the action or proceeding. This limitation does not apply to motions for summary adjudication.
(5)Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, on motion or application of any party and a showing of good cause, the court may grant leave for the moving party to bring an additional motion for summary judgment. The moving party shall serve the notice and supporting papers for any such additional motion in accordance with paragraph (2) of subdivision (a).
(b)(1)The motion shall be supported by affidavits, declarations, admissions, answers to interrogatories, depositions, and matters of which judicial notice shall or may be taken. The supporting papers shall include a separate statement setting forth plainly and concisely all material facts that the moving party contends are undisputed. Each of the material facts stated shall be followed by a reference to the supporting evidence. The failure to comply with this requirement of a separate statement may in the courts discretion constitute a sufficient ground for denying the motion.
(2)An opposition to the motion shall be served and filed not less than 20 days preceding the noticed or continued date of hearing, unless the court for good cause orders otherwise. The opposition, where appropriate, shall consist of affidavits, declarations, admissions, answers to interrogatories, depositions, and matters of which judicial notice shall or may be taken.
(3)The opposition papers shall include a separate statement that responds to each of the material facts contended by the moving party to be undisputed, indicating if the opposing party agrees or disagrees that those facts are undisputed. The statement also shall set forth plainly and concisely any other material facts the opposing party contends are disputed. Each material fact contended by the opposing party to be disputed shall be followed by a reference to the supporting evidence. Failure to comply with this requirement of a separate statement may constitute a sufficient ground, in the courts discretion, for granting the motion.
(4)A reply to the opposition shall be served and filed by the moving party not less than 11 days preceding the noticed or continued date of hearing, unless the court for good cause orders otherwise. The reply shall not include any new evidentiary matter, additional material facts, or separate statement submitted with the reply and not presented in the moving papers or opposing papers.
(5)Evidentiary objections not made at the hearing shall be deemed waived.
(6)Except for subdivision (c) of Section 1005 relating to the method of service of opposition and reply papers, Sections 1005 and 1013, extending the time within which a right may be exercised or an act may be done, do not apply to this section.
(7)An incorporation by reference of a matter in the courts file shall set forth with specificity the exact matter to which reference is being made and shall not incorporate the entire file.
(c)The motion for summary judgment shall be granted if all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. In determining if the papers show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact, the court shall consider all of the evidence set forth in the papers, except the evidence to which objections have been made and sustained by the court, and all inferences reasonably deducible from the evidence, except summary judgment shall not be granted by the court based on inferences reasonably deducible from the evidence if contradicted by other inferences or evidence that raise a triable issue as to any material fact.
(d)Supporting and opposing affidavits or declarations shall be made by a person on personal knowledge, shall set forth admissible evidence, and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated in the affidavits or declarations. An objection based on the failure to comply with the requirements of this subdivision, if not made at the hearing, shall be deemed waived.
(e)If a party is otherwise entitled to summary judgment pursuant to this section, summary judgment shall not be denied on grounds of credibility or for want of cross-examination of witnesses furnishing affidavits or declarations in support of the summary judgment, except that summary judgment may be denied in the discretion of the court if the only proof of a material fact offered in support of the summary judgment is an affidavit or declaration made by an individual who was the sole witness to that fact; or if a material fact is an individuals state of mind, or lack thereof, and that fact is sought to be established solely by the individuals affirmation thereof.
(f)(1)A party may move for summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action within an action, one or more affirmative defenses, one or more claims for damages, or one or more issues of duty, if the party contends that the cause of action has no merit, that there is no affirmative defense to the cause of action, that there is no merit to an affirmative defense as to any cause of action, that there is no merit to a claim for damages, as specified in Section 3294 of the Civil Code, or that one or more defendants either owed or did not owe a duty to the plaintiff or plaintiffs. A motion for summary adjudication shall be granted only if it completely disposes of a cause of action, an affirmative defense, a claim for damages, or an issue of duty.
(2)A motion for summary adjudication may be made by itself or as an alternative to a motion for summary judgment and shall proceed in all procedural respects as a motion for summary judgment. A party shall not move for summary judgment based on issues asserted in a prior motion for summary adjudication and denied by the court unless that party establishes, to the satisfaction of the court, newly discovered facts or circumstances or a change of law supporting the issues reasserted in the summary judgment motion.
(g)Upon the denial of a motion for summary judgment on the ground that there is a triable issue as to one or more material facts, the court shall, by written or oral order, specify one or more material facts raised by the motion that the court has determined there exists a triable controversy. This determination shall specifically refer to the evidence proffered in support of and in opposition to the motion that indicates that a triable controversy exists. Upon the grant of a motion for summary judgment on the ground that there is no triable issue of material fact, the court shall, by written or oral order, specify the reasons for its determination. The order shall specifically refer to the evidence proffered in support of and, if applicable, in opposition to the motion that indicates no triable issue exists. The court shall also state its reasons for any other determination. The court shall record its determination by court reporter or written order.
(h)If it appears from the affidavits submitted in opposition to a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication, or both, that facts essential to justify opposition may exist but cannot, for reasons stated, be presented, the court shall deny the motion, order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or discovery to be had, or make any other order as may be just. The application to continue the motion to obtain necessary discovery may also be made by ex parte motion at any time on or before the date the opposition response to the motion is due.
(i)If, after granting a continuance to allow specified additional discovery, the court determines that the party seeking summary judgment has unreasonably failed to allow the discovery to be conducted, the court shall grant a continuance to permit the discovery to go forward or deny the motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication. This section does not affect or limit the ability of a party to compel discovery under the Civil Discovery Act (Title 4 (commencing with Section 2016.010) of Part 4).
(j)If the court determines at any time that an affidavit was presented in bad faith or solely for the purpose of delay, the court shall order the party who presented the affidavit to pay the other party the amount of the reasonable expenses the filing of the affidavit caused the other party to incur. Sanctions shall not be imposed pursuant to this subdivision except on notice contained in a partys papers or on the courts own noticed motion, and after an opportunity to be heard.
(k)Unless a separate judgment may properly be awarded in the action, a final judgment shall not be entered on a motion for summary judgment before the termination of the action, but the final judgment shall, in addition to any matters determined in the action, award judgment as established by the summary proceeding provided for in this section.
(l)In an action arising out of an injury to the person or to property, if a motion for summary judgment is granted on the basis that the defendant was without fault, no other defendant during trial, over plaintiffs objection, may attempt to attribute fault to, or comment on, the absence or involvement of the defendant who was granted the motion.
(m)(1)A summary judgment entered under this section is an appealable judgment as in other cases. Upon entry of an order pursuant to this section, except the entry of summary judgment, a party may, within 20 days after service upon the party of a written notice of entry of the order, petition an appropriate reviewing court for a peremptory writ. If the notice is served by mail, the initial period within which to file the petition shall be increased by five days if the place of address is within the State of California, 10 days if the place of address is outside the State of California but within the United States, and 20 days if the place of address is outside the United States. If the notice is served by facsimile transmission, express mail, or another method of delivery providing for overnight delivery, the initial period within which to file the petition shall be increased by two court days. The superior court may, for good cause, and before the expiration of the initial period, extend the time for one additional period not to exceed 10 days.
(2)Before a reviewing court affirms an order granting summary judgment or summary adjudication on a ground not relied upon by the trial court, the reviewing court shall afford the parties an opportunity to present their views on the issue by submitting supplemental briefs. The supplemental briefs may include an argument that additional evidence relating to that ground exists, but the party has not had an adequate opportunity to present the evidence or to conduct discovery on the issue. The court may reverse or remand based upon the supplemental briefs to allow the parties to present additional evidence or to conduct discovery on the issue. If the court fails to allow supplemental briefs, a rehearing shall be ordered upon timely petition of a party.
(n)(1)If a motion for summary adjudication is granted, at the trial of the action, the cause or causes of action within the action, affirmative defense or defenses, claim for damages, or issue or issues of duty as to the motion that has been granted shall be deemed to be established and the action shall proceed as to the cause or causes of action, affirmative defense or defenses, claim for damages, or issue or issues of duty remaining.
(2)In the trial of the action, the fact that a motion for summary adjudication is granted as to one or more causes of action, affirmative defenses, claims for damages, or issues of duty within the action shall not bar any cause of action, affirmative defense, claim for damages, or issue of duty as to which summary adjudication was either not sought or denied.
(3)In the trial of an action, neither a party, a witness, nor the court shall comment to a jury upon the grant or denial of a motion for summary adjudication.
(o)A cause of action has no merit if either of the following exists:
(1)One or more of the elements of the cause of action cannot be separately established, even if that element is separately pleaded.
(2)A defendant establishes an affirmative defense to that cause of action.
(p)For purposes of motions for summary judgment and summary adjudication:
(1)A plaintiff or cross-complainant has met that partys burden of showing that there is no defense to a cause of action if that party has proved each element of the cause of action entitling the party to judgment on the cause of action. Once the plaintiff or cross-complainant has met that burden, the burden shifts to the defendant or cross-defendant to show that a triable issue of one or more material facts exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto. The defendant or cross-defendant shall not rely upon the allegations or denials of its pleadings to show that a triable issue of material fact exists but, instead, shall set forth the specific facts showing that a triable issue of material fact exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto.
(2)A defendant or cross-defendant has met that partys burden of showing that a cause of action has no merit if the party has shown that one or more elements of the cause of action, even if not separately pleaded, cannot be established, or that there is a complete defense to the cause of action. Once the defendant or cross-defendant has met that burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff or cross-complainant to show that a triable issue of one or more material facts exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto. The plaintiff or cross-complainant shall not rely upon the allegations or denials of its pleadings to show that a triable issue of material fact exists but, instead, shall set forth the specific facts showing that a triable issue of material fact exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto.
(q)In granting or denying a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication, the court need rule only on those objections to evidence that it deems material to its disposition of the motion. Objections to evidence that are not ruled on for purposes of the motion shall be preserved for appellate review.
(r)This section does not extend the period for trial provided by Section 1170.5.
(s)Subdivisions (a) and (b) do not apply to actions brought pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 1159) of Title 3 of Part 3.
(t)Notwithstanding subdivision (f), a party may move for summary adjudication of a legal issue or a claim for damages other than punitive damages that does not completely dispose of a cause of action, affirmative defense, or issue of duty pursuant to this subdivision.
(1)(A)Before filing a motion pursuant to this subdivision, the parties whose claims or defenses are put at issue by the motion shall submit to the court both of the following:
(i)A joint stipulation stating the issue or issues to be adjudicated.
(ii)A declaration from each stipulating party that the motion will further the interest of judicial economy by decreasing trial time or significantly increasing the likelihood of settlement.
(B)The joint stipulation shall be served on any party to the civil action who is not also a party to the motion.
(2)Within 15 days of receipt of the stipulation and declarations, unless the court has good cause for extending the time, the court shall notify the stipulating parties if the motion may be filed. In making this determination, the court may consider objections by a nonstipulating party made within 10 days of the submission of the stipulation and declarations.
(3)If the court elects not to allow the filing of the motion, the stipulating parties may request, and upon request the court shall conduct, an informal conference with the stipulating parties to permit further evaluation of the proposed stipulation. The stipulating parties shall not file additional papers in support of the motion.
(4)(A)A motion for summary adjudication made pursuant to this subdivision shall contain a statement in the notice of motion that reads substantially similar to the following: This motion is made pursuant to subdivision (t) of Section 437c of the Code of Civil Procedure. The parties to this motion stipulate that the court shall hear this motion and that the resolution of this motion will further the interest of judicial economy by decreasing trial time or significantly increasing the likelihood of settlement.
(B)The notice of motion shall be signed by counsel for all parties, and by those parties in propria persona, to the motion.
(5)A motion filed pursuant to this subdivision may be made by itself or as an alternative to a motion for summary judgment and shall proceed in all procedural respects as a motion for summary judgment.
(u)For purposes of this section, a change in law does not include a later enacted statute without retroactive application.
(a)(1)A party may move for summary judgment in an action or proceeding if it is contended that the action has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding. The motion may be made at any time after 60 days have elapsed since the general appearance in the action or proceeding of each party against whom the motion is directed or at any earlier time after the general appearance that the court, with or without notice and upon good cause shown, may direct.
(2)Notice of the motion and supporting papers shall be served on all other parties to the action at least 81 days before the time appointed for hearing. If the notice is served by mail, the required 81-day period of notice shall be increased by 5 days if the place of address is within the State of California, 10 days if the place of address is outside the State of California but within the United States, and 20 days if the place of address is outside the United States. If the notice is served by facsimile transmission, express mail, or another method of delivery providing for overnight delivery, the required 81-day period of notice shall be increased by two court days.
(3)The motion shall be heard no later than 30 days before the date of trial, unless the court for good cause orders otherwise. The filing of the motion shall not extend the time within which a party must otherwise file a responsive pleading.
(4)A party shall not bring more than one motion for summary judgment against an adverse party to the action or proceeding. This limitation does not apply to motions for summary adjudication.
(5)Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, on motion or application of any party and a showing of good cause, the court may grant leave for the moving party to bring an additional motion for summary judgment. The moving party shall serve the notice and supporting papers for any such additional motion in accordance with paragraph (2) of subdivision (a).
(b)(1)The motion shall be supported by affidavits, declarations, admissions, answers to interrogatories, depositions, and matters of which judicial notice shall or may be taken. The supporting papers shall include a separate statement setting forth plainly and concisely all material facts that the moving party contends are undisputed. Each of the material facts stated shall be followed by a reference to the supporting evidence. The failure to comply with this requirement of a separate statement may in the courts discretion constitute a sufficient ground for denying the motion.
(2)An opposition to the motion shall be served and filed not less than 20 days preceding the noticed or continued date of hearing, unless the court for good cause orders otherwise. The opposition, where appropriate, shall consist of affidavits, declarations, admissions, answers to interrogatories, depositions, and matters of which judicial notice shall or may be taken.
(3)The opposition papers shall include a separate statement that responds to each of the material facts contended by the moving party to be undisputed, indicating if the opposing party agrees or disagrees that those facts are undisputed. The statement also shall set forth plainly and concisely any other material facts the opposing party contends are disputed. Each material fact contended by the opposing party to be disputed shall be followed by a reference to the supporting evidence. Failure to comply with this requirement of a separate statement may constitute a sufficient ground, in the courts discretion, for granting the motion.
(4)A reply to the opposition shall be served and filed by the moving party not less than 11 days preceding the noticed or continued date of hearing, unless the court for good cause orders otherwise. The reply shall not include any new evidentiary matter, additional material facts, or separate statement submitted with the reply and not presented in the moving papers or opposing papers.
(5)Evidentiary objections not made at the hearing shall be deemed waived.
(6)Except for subdivision (c) of Section 1005 relating to the method of service of opposition and reply papers, Sections 1005 and 1013, extending the time within which a right may be exercised or an act may be done, do not apply to this section.
(7)An incorporation by reference of a matter in the courts file shall set forth with specificity the exact matter to which reference is being made and shall not incorporate the entire file.
(c)The motion for summary judgment shall be granted if all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. In determining if the papers show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact, the court shall consider all of the evidence set forth in the papers, except the evidence to which objections have been made and sustained by the court, and all inferences reasonably deducible from the evidence, except summary judgment shall not be granted by the court based on inferences reasonably deducible from the evidence if contradicted by other inferences or evidence that raise a triable issue as to any material fact.
(d)Supporting and opposing affidavits or declarations shall be made by a person on personal knowledge, shall set forth admissible evidence, and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated in the affidavits or declarations. An objection based on the failure to comply with the requirements of this subdivision, if not made at the hearing, shall be deemed waived.
(e)If a party is otherwise entitled to summary judgment pursuant to this section, summary judgment shall not be denied on grounds of credibility or for want of cross-examination of witnesses furnishing affidavits or declarations in support of the summary judgment, except that summary judgment may be denied in the discretion of the court if the only proof of a material fact offered in support of the summary judgment is an affidavit or declaration made by an individual who was the sole witness to that fact; or if a material fact is an individuals state of mind, or lack thereof, and that fact is sought to be established solely by the individuals affirmation thereof.
(f)(1)A party may move for summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action within an action, one or more affirmative defenses, one or more claims for damages, or one or more issues of duty, if the party contends that the cause of action has no merit, that there is no affirmative defense to the cause of action, that there is no merit to an affirmative defense as to any cause of action, that there is no merit to a claim for damages, as specified in Section 3294 of the Civil Code, or that one or more defendants either owed or did not owe a duty to the plaintiff or plaintiffs. A motion for summary adjudication shall be granted only if it completely disposes of a cause of action, an affirmative defense, a claim for damages, or an issue of duty.
(2)A motion for summary adjudication may be made by itself or as an alternative to a motion for summary judgment and shall proceed in all procedural respects as a motion for summary judgment. A party shall not move for summary judgment based on issues asserted in a prior motion for summary adjudication and denied by the court unless that party establishes, to the satisfaction of the court, newly discovered facts or circumstances or a change of law supporting the issues reasserted in the summary judgment motion.
(g)Upon the denial of a motion for summary judgment on the ground that there is a triable issue as to one or more material facts, the court shall, by written or oral order, specify one or more material facts raised by the motion that the court has determined there exists a triable controversy. This determination shall specifically refer to the evidence proffered in support of and in opposition to the motion that indicates that a triable controversy exists. Upon the grant of a motion for summary judgment on the ground that there is no triable issue of material fact, the court shall, by written or oral order, specify the reasons for its determination. The order shall specifically refer to the evidence proffered in support of and, if applicable, in opposition to the motion that indicates no triable issue exists. The court shall also state its reasons for any other determination. The court shall record its determination by court reporter or written order.
(h)If it appears from the affidavits submitted in opposition to a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication, or both, that facts essential to justify opposition may exist but cannot, for reasons stated, be presented, the court shall deny the motion, order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or discovery to be had, or make any other order as may be just. The application to continue the motion to obtain necessary discovery may also be made by ex parte motion at any time on or before the date the opposition response to the motion is due.
(i)If, after granting a continuance to allow specified additional discovery, the court determines that the party seeking summary judgment has unreasonably failed to allow the discovery to be conducted, the court shall grant a continuance to permit the discovery to go forward or deny the motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication. This section does not affect or limit the ability of a party to compel discovery under the Civil Discovery Act (Title 4 (commencing with Section 2016.010) of Part 4).
(j)If the court determines at any time that an affidavit was presented in bad faith or solely for the purpose of delay, the court shall order the party who presented the affidavit to pay the other party the amount of the reasonable expenses the filing of the affidavit caused the other party to incur. Sanctions shall not be imposed pursuant to this subdivision except on notice contained in a partys papers or on the courts own noticed motion, and after an opportunity to be heard.
(k)Unless a separate judgment may properly be awarded in the action, a final judgment shall not be entered on a motion for summary judgment before the termination of the action, but the final judgment shall, in addition to any matters determined in the action, award judgment as established by the summary proceeding provided for in this section.
(l)In an action arising out of an injury to the person or to property, if a motion for summary judgment is granted on the basis that the defendant was without fault, no other defendant during trial, over plaintiffs objection, may attempt to attribute fault to, or comment on, the absence or involvement of the defendant who was granted the motion.
(m)(1)A summary judgment entered under this section is an appealable judgment as in other cases. Upon entry of an order pursuant to this section, except the entry of summary judgment, a party may, within 20 days after service upon the party of a written notice of entry of the order, petition an appropriate reviewing court for a peremptory writ. If the notice is served by mail, the initial period within which to file the petition shall be increased by five days if the place of address is within the State of California, 10 days if the place of address is outside the State of California but within the United States, and 20 days if the place of address is outside the United States. If the notice is served by facsimile transmission, express mail, or another method of delivery providing for overnight delivery, the initial period within which to file the petition shall be increased by two court days. The superior court may, for good cause, and before the expiration of the initial period, extend the time for one additional period not to exceed 10 days.
(2)Before a reviewing court affirms an order granting summary judgment or summary adjudication on a ground not relied upon by the trial court, the reviewing court shall afford the parties an opportunity to present their views on the issue by submitting supplemental briefs. The supplemental briefs may include an argument that additional evidence relating to that ground exists, but the party has not had an adequate opportunity to present the evidence or to conduct discovery on the issue. The court may reverse or remand based upon the supplemental briefs to allow the parties to present additional evidence or to conduct discovery on the issue. If the court fails to allow supplemental briefs, a rehearing shall be ordered upon timely petition of a party.
(n)(1)If a motion for summary adjudication is granted, at the trial of the action, the cause or causes of action within the action, affirmative defense or defenses, claim for damages, or issue or issues of duty as to the motion that has been granted shall be deemed to be established and the action shall proceed as to the cause or causes of action, affirmative defense or defenses, claim for damages, or issue or issues of duty remaining.
(2)In the trial of the action, the fact that a motion for summary adjudication is granted as to one or more causes of action, affirmative defenses, claims for damages, or issues of duty within the action shall not bar any cause of action, affirmative defense, claim for damages, or issue of duty as to which summary adjudication was either not sought or denied.
(3)In the trial of an action, neither a party, a witness, nor the court shall comment to a jury upon the grant or denial of a motion for summary adjudication.
(o)A cause of action has no merit if either of the following exists:
(1)One or more of the elements of the cause of action cannot be separately established, even if that element is separately pleaded.
(2)A defendant establishes an affirmative defense to that cause of action.
(p)For purposes of motions for summary judgment and summary adjudication:
(1)A plaintiff or cross-complainant has met that partys burden of showing that there is no defense to a cause of action if that party has proved each element of the cause of action entitling the party to judgment on the cause of action. Once the plaintiff or cross-complainant has met that burden, the burden shifts to the defendant or cross-defendant to show that a triable issue of one or more material facts exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto. The defendant or cross-defendant shall not rely upon the allegations or denials of its pleadings to show that a triable issue of material fact exists but, instead, shall set forth the specific facts showing that a triable issue of material fact exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto.
(2)A defendant or cross-defendant has met that partys burden of showing that a cause of action has no merit if the party has shown that one or more elements of the cause of action, even if not separately pleaded, cannot be established, or that there is a complete defense to the cause of action. Once the defendant or cross-defendant has met that burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff or cross-complainant to show that a triable issue of one or more material facts exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto. The plaintiff or cross-complainant shall not rely upon the allegations or denials of its pleadings to show that a triable issue of material fact exists but, instead, shall set forth the specific facts showing that a triable issue of material fact exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto.
(q)In granting or denying a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication, the court need rule only on those objections to evidence that it deems material to its disposition of the motion. Objections to evidence that are not ruled on for purposes of the motion shall be preserved for appellate review.
(r)This section does not extend the period for trial provided by Section 1170.5.
(s)Subdivisions (a) and (b) do not apply to actions brought pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 1159) of Title 3 of Part 3.
(t)Notwithstanding subdivision (f), a party may move for summary adjudication of a legal issue or a claim for damages other than punitive damages that does not completely dispose of a cause of action, affirmative defense, or issue of duty pursuant to this subdivision.
(1)(A)Before filing a motion pursuant to this subdivision, the parties whose claims or defenses are put at issue by the motion shall submit to the court both of the following:
(i)A joint stipulation stating the issue or issues to be adjudicated.
(ii)A declaration from each stipulating party that the motion will further the interest of judicial economy by decreasing trial time or significantly increasing the likelihood of settlement.
(B)The joint stipulation shall be served on any party to the civil action who is not also a party to the motion.
(2)Within 15 days of receipt of the stipulation and declarations, unless the court has good cause for extending the time, the court shall notify the stipulating parties if the motion may be filed. In making this determination, the court may consider objections by a nonstipulating party made within 10 days of the submission of the stipulation and declarations.
(3)If the court elects not to allow the filing of the motion, the stipulating parties may request, and upon request the court shall conduct, an informal conference with the stipulating parties to permit further evaluation of the proposed stipulation. The stipulating parties shall not file additional papers in support of the motion.
(4)(A)A motion for summary adjudication made pursuant to this subdivision shall contain a statement in the notice of motion that reads substantially similar to the following: This motion is made pursuant to subdivision (t) of Section 437c of the Code of Civil Procedure. The parties to this motion stipulate that the court shall hear this motion and that the resolution of this motion will further the interest of judicial economy by decreasing trial time or significantly increasing the likelihood of settlement.
(B)The notice of motion shall be signed by counsel for all parties, and by those parties in propria persona, to the motion.
(5)A motion filed pursuant to this subdivision may be made by itself or as an alternative to a motion for summary judgment and shall proceed in all procedural respects as a motion for summary judgment.
(u)For purposes of this section, a change in law does not include a later enacted statute without retroactive application.
(a)(1)A party may move for summary judgment in an action or proceeding if it is contended that the action has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding. The motion may be made at any time after 60 days have elapsed since the general appearance in the action or proceeding of each party against whom the motion is directed or at any earlier time after the general appearance that the court, with or without notice and upon good cause shown, may direct.
(2)Notice of the motion and supporting papers shall be served on all other parties to the action at least 81 days before the time appointed for hearing. If the notice is served by mail, the required 81-day period of notice shall be increased by 5 days if the place of address is within the State of California, 10 days if the place of address is outside the State of California but within the United States, and 20 days if the place of address is outside the United States. If the notice is served by facsimile transmission, express mail, or another method of delivery providing for overnight delivery, the required 81-day period of notice shall be increased by two court days.
(3)The motion shall be heard no later than 30 days before the date of trial, unless the court for good cause orders otherwise. The filing of the motion shall not extend the time within which a party must otherwise file a responsive pleading.
(4)A party shall not bring more than one motion for summary judgment against an adverse party to the action or proceeding. This limitation does not apply to motions for summary adjudication.
(5)Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, on motion or application of any party and a showing of good cause, the court may grant leave for the moving party to bring an additional motion for summary judgment. The moving party shall serve the notice and supporting papers for any such additional motion in accordance with paragraph (2) of subdivision (a).
(b)(1)The motion shall be supported by affidavits, declarations, admissions, answers to interrogatories, depositions, and matters of which judicial notice shall or may be taken. The supporting papers shall include a separate statement setting forth plainly and concisely all material facts that the moving party contends are undisputed. Each of the material facts stated shall be followed by a reference to the supporting evidence. The failure to comply with this requirement of a separate statement may in the courts discretion constitute a sufficient ground for denying the motion.
(2)An opposition to the motion shall be served and filed not less than 20 days preceding the noticed or continued date of hearing, unless the court for good cause orders otherwise. The opposition, where appropriate, shall consist of affidavits, declarations, admissions, answers to interrogatories, depositions, and matters of which judicial notice shall or may be taken.
(3)The opposition papers shall include a separate statement that responds to each of the material facts contended by the moving party to be undisputed, indicating if the opposing party agrees or disagrees that those facts are undisputed. The statement also shall set forth plainly and concisely any other material facts the opposing party contends are disputed. Each material fact contended by the opposing party to be disputed shall be followed by a reference to the supporting evidence. Failure to comply with this requirement of a separate statement may constitute a sufficient ground, in the courts discretion, for granting the motion.
(4)A reply to the opposition shall be served and filed by the moving party not less than 11 days preceding the noticed or continued date of hearing, unless the court for good cause orders otherwise. The reply shall not include any new evidentiary matter, additional material facts, or separate statement submitted with the reply and not presented in the moving papers or opposing papers.
(5)Evidentiary objections not made at the hearing shall be deemed waived.
(6)Except for subdivision (c) of Section 1005 relating to the method of service of opposition and reply papers, Sections 1005 and 1013, extending the time within which a right may be exercised or an act may be done, do not apply to this section.
(7)An incorporation by reference of a matter in the courts file shall set forth with specificity the exact matter to which reference is being made and shall not incorporate the entire file.
(c)The motion for summary judgment shall be granted if all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. In determining if the papers show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact, the court shall consider all of the evidence set forth in the papers, except the evidence to which objections have been made and sustained by the court, and all inferences reasonably deducible from the evidence, except summary judgment shall not be granted by the court based on inferences reasonably deducible from the evidence if contradicted by other inferences or evidence that raise a triable issue as to any material fact.
(d)Supporting and opposing affidavits or declarations shall be made by a person on personal knowledge, shall set forth admissible evidence, and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated in the affidavits or declarations. An objection based on the failure to comply with the requirements of this subdivision, if not made at the hearing, shall be deemed waived.
(e)If a party is otherwise entitled to summary judgment pursuant to this section, summary judgment shall not be denied on grounds of credibility or for want of cross-examination of witnesses furnishing affidavits or declarations in support of the summary judgment, except that summary judgment may be denied in the discretion of the court if the only proof of a material fact offered in support of the summary judgment is an affidavit or declaration made by an individual who was the sole witness to that fact; or if a material fact is an individuals state of mind, or lack thereof, and that fact is sought to be established solely by the individuals affirmation thereof.
(f)(1)A party may move for summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action within an action, one or more affirmative defenses, one or more claims for damages, or one or more issues of duty, if the party contends that the cause of action has no merit, that there is no affirmative defense to the cause of action, that there is no merit to an affirmative defense as to any cause of action, that there is no merit to a claim for damages, as specified in Section 3294 of the Civil Code, or that one or more defendants either owed or did not owe a duty to the plaintiff or plaintiffs. A motion for summary adjudication shall be granted only if it completely disposes of a cause of action, an affirmative defense, a claim for damages, or an issue of duty.
(2)A motion for summary adjudication may be made by itself or as an alternative to a motion for summary judgment and shall proceed in all procedural respects as a motion for summary judgment. A party shall not move for summary judgment based on issues asserted in a prior motion for summary adjudication and denied by the court unless that party establishes, to the satisfaction of the court, newly discovered facts or circumstances or a change of law supporting the issues reasserted in the summary judgment motion.
(g)Upon the denial of a motion for summary judgment on the ground that there is a triable issue as to one or more material facts, the court shall, by written or oral order, specify one or more material facts raised by the motion that the court has determined there exists a triable controversy. This determination shall specifically refer to the evidence proffered in support of and in opposition to the motion that indicates that a triable controversy exists. Upon the grant of a motion for summary judgment on the ground that there is no triable issue of material fact, the court shall, by written or oral order, specify the reasons for its determination. The order shall specifically refer to the evidence proffered in support of and, if applicable, in opposition to the motion that indicates no triable issue exists. The court shall also state its reasons for any other determination. The court shall record its determination by court reporter or written order.
(h)If it appears from the affidavits submitted in opposition to a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication, or both, that facts essential to justify opposition may exist but cannot, for reasons stated, be presented, the court shall deny the motion, order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or discovery to be had, or make any other order as may be just. The application to continue the motion to obtain necessary discovery may also be made by ex parte motion at any time on or before the date the opposition response to the motion is due.
(i)If, after granting a continuance to allow specified additional discovery, the court determines that the party seeking summary judgment has unreasonably failed to allow the discovery to be conducted, the court shall grant a continuance to permit the discovery to go forward or deny the motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication. This section does not affect or limit the ability of a party to compel discovery under the Civil Discovery Act (Title 4 (commencing with Section 2016.010) of Part 4).
(j)If the court determines at any time that an affidavit was presented in bad faith or solely for the purpose of delay, the court shall order the party who presented the affidavit to pay the other party the amount of the reasonable expenses the filing of the affidavit caused the other party to incur. Sanctions shall not be imposed pursuant to this subdivision except on notice contained in a partys papers or on the courts own noticed motion, and after an opportunity to be heard.
(k)Unless a separate judgment may properly be awarded in the action, a final judgment shall not be entered on a motion for summary judgment before the termination of the action, but the final judgment shall, in addition to any matters determined in the action, award judgment as established by the summary proceeding provided for in this section.
(l)In an action arising out of an injury to the person or to property, if a motion for summary judgment is granted on the basis that the defendant was without fault, no other defendant during trial, over plaintiffs objection, may attempt to attribute fault to, or comment on, the absence or involvement of the defendant who was granted the motion.
(m)(1)A summary judgment entered under this section is an appealable judgment as in other cases. Upon entry of an order pursuant to this section, except the entry of summary judgment, a party may, within 20 days after service upon the party of a written notice of entry of the order, petition an appropriate reviewing court for a peremptory writ. If the notice is served by mail, the initial period within which to file the petition shall be increased by five days if the place of address is within the State of California, 10 days if the place of address is outside the State of California but within the United States, and 20 days if the place of address is outside the United States. If the notice is served by facsimile transmission, express mail, or another method of delivery providing for overnight delivery, the initial period within which to file the petition shall be increased by two court days. The superior court may, for good cause, and before the expiration of the initial period, extend the time for one additional period not to exceed 10 days.
(2)Before a reviewing court affirms an order granting summary judgment or summary adjudication on a ground not relied upon by the trial court, the reviewing court shall afford the parties an opportunity to present their views on the issue by submitting supplemental briefs. The supplemental briefs may include an argument that additional evidence relating to that ground exists, but the party has not had an adequate opportunity to present the evidence or to conduct discovery on the issue. The court may reverse or remand based upon the supplemental briefs to allow the parties to present additional evidence or to conduct discovery on the issue. If the court fails to allow supplemental briefs, a rehearing shall be ordered upon timely petition of a party.
(n)(1)If a motion for summary adjudication is granted, at the trial of the action, the cause or causes of action within the action, affirmative defense or defenses, claim for damages, or issue or issues of duty as to the motion that has been granted shall be deemed to be established and the action shall proceed as to the cause or causes of action, affirmative defense or defenses, claim for damages, or issue or issues of duty remaining.
(2)In the trial of the action, the fact that a motion for summary adjudication is granted as to one or more causes of action, affirmative defenses, claims for damages, or issues of duty within the action shall not bar any cause of action, affirmative defense, claim for damages, or issue of duty as to which summary adjudication was either not sought or denied.
(3)In the trial of an action, neither a party, a witness, nor the court shall comment to a jury upon the grant or denial of a motion for summary adjudication.
(o)A cause of action has no merit if either of the following exists:
(1)One or more of the elements of the cause of action cannot be separately established, even if that element is separately pleaded.
(2)A defendant establishes an affirmative defense to that cause of action.
(p)For purposes of motions for summary judgment and summary adjudication:
(1)A plaintiff or cross-complainant has met that partys burden of showing that there is no defense to a cause of action if that party has proved each element of the cause of action entitling the party to judgment on the cause of action. Once the plaintiff or cross-complainant has met that burden, the burden shifts to the defendant or cross-defendant to show that a triable issue of one or more material facts exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto. The defendant or cross-defendant shall not rely upon the allegations or denials of its pleadings to show that a triable issue of material fact exists but, instead, shall set forth the specific facts showing that a triable issue of material fact exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto.
(2)A defendant or cross-defendant has met that partys burden of showing that a cause of action has no merit if the party has shown that one or more elements of the cause of action, even if not separately pleaded, cannot be established, or that there is a complete defense to the cause of action. Once the defendant or cross-defendant has met that burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff or cross-complainant to show that a triable issue of one or more material facts exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto. The plaintiff or cross-complainant shall not rely upon the allegations or denials of its pleadings to show that a triable issue of material fact exists but, instead, shall set forth the specific facts showing that a triable issue of material fact exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto.
(q)In granting or denying a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication, the court need rule only on those objections to evidence that it deems material to its disposition of the motion. Objections to evidence that are not ruled on for purposes of the motion shall be preserved for appellate review.
(r)This section does not extend the period for trial provided by Section 1170.5.
(s)Subdivisions (a) and (b) do not apply to actions brought pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 1159) of Title 3 of Part 3.
(t)Notwithstanding subdivision (f), a party may move for summary adjudication of a legal issue or a claim for damages other than punitive damages that does not completely dispose of a cause of action, affirmative defense, or issue of duty pursuant to this subdivision.
(1)(A)Before filing a motion pursuant to this subdivision, the parties whose claims or defenses are put at issue by the motion shall submit to the court both of the following:
(i)A joint stipulation stating the issue or issues to be adjudicated.
(ii)A declaration from each stipulating party that the motion will further the interest of judicial economy by decreasing trial time or significantly increasing the likelihood of settlement.
(B)The joint stipulation shall be served on any party to the civil action who is not also a party to the motion.
(2)Within 15 days of receipt of the stipulation and declarations, unless the court has good cause for extending the time, the court shall notify the stipulating parties if the motion may be filed. In making this determination, the court may consider objections by a nonstipulating party made within 10 days of the submission of the stipulation and declarations.
(3)If the court elects not to allow the filing of the motion, the stipulating parties may request, and upon request the court shall conduct, an informal conference with the stipulating parties to permit further evaluation of the proposed stipulation. The stipulating parties shall not file additional papers in support of the motion.
(4)(A)A motion for summary adjudication made pursuant to this subdivision shall contain a statement in the notice of motion that reads substantially similar to the following: This motion is made pursuant to subdivision (t) of Section 437c of the Code of Civil Procedure. The parties to this motion stipulate that the court shall hear this motion and that the resolution of this motion will further the interest of judicial economy by decreasing trial time or significantly increasing the likelihood of settlement.
(B)The notice of motion shall be signed by counsel for all parties, and by those parties in propria persona, to the motion.
(5)A motion filed pursuant to this subdivision may be made by itself or as an alternative to a motion for summary judgment and shall proceed in all procedural respects as a motion for summary judgment.
(u)For purposes of this section, a change in law does not include a later enacted statute without retroactive application.
(a)(1)A party may move for summary judgment in an action or proceeding if it is contended that the action has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding. The motion may be made at any time after 60 days have elapsed since the general appearance in the action or proceeding of each party against whom the motion is directed or at any earlier time after the general appearance that the court, with or without notice and upon good cause shown, may direct.
(2)Notice of the motion and supporting papers shall be served on all other parties to the action at least 75 81 days before the time appointed for hearing. If the notice is served by mail, the required 75-day 81-day period of notice shall be increased by 5 days if the place of address is within the State of California, 10 days if the place of address is outside the State of California but within the United States, and 20 days if the place of address is outside the United States. If the notice is served by facsimile transmission, express mail, or another method of delivery providing for overnight delivery, the required 75-day 81-day period of notice shall be increased by two court days.
(3)The motion shall be heard no later than 30 days before the date of trial, unless the court for good cause orders otherwise. The filing of the motion shall not extend the time within which a party must otherwise file a responsive pleading.
(b)(1)The motion shall be supported by affidavits, declarations, admissions, answers to interrogatories, depositions, and matters of which judicial notice shall or may be taken. The supporting papers shall include a separate statement setting forth plainly and concisely all material facts that the moving party contends are undisputed. Each of the material facts stated shall be followed by a reference to the supporting evidence. The failure to comply with this requirement of a separate statement may in the courts discretion constitute a sufficient ground for denying the motion.
(2)An opposition to the motion shall be served and filed not less than 14 20 days preceding the noticed or continued date of hearing, unless the court for good cause orders otherwise. The opposition, where appropriate, shall consist of affidavits, declarations, admissions, answers to interrogatories, depositions, and matters of which judicial notice shall or may be taken.
(3)The opposition papers shall include a separate statement that responds to each of the material facts contended by the moving party to be undisputed, indicating if the opposing party agrees or disagrees that those facts are undisputed. The statement also shall set forth plainly and concisely any other material facts the opposing party contends are disputed. Each material fact contended by the opposing party to be disputed shall be followed by a reference to the supporting evidence. Failure to comply with this requirement of a separate statement may constitute a sufficient ground, in the courts discretion, for granting the motion.
(4)A reply to the opposition shall be served and filed by the moving party not less than five 11 days preceding the noticed or continued date of hearing, unless the court for good cause orders otherwise.
(5)Evidentiary objections not made at the hearing shall be deemed waived.
(6)Except for subdivision (c) of Section 1005 relating to the method of service of opposition and reply papers, Sections 1005 and 1013, extending the time within which a right may be exercised or an act may be done, do not apply to this section.
(7)An incorporation by reference of a matter in the courts file shall set forth with specificity the exact matter to which reference is being made and shall not incorporate the entire file.
(c)The motion for summary judgment shall be granted if all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. In determining if the papers show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact, the court shall consider all of the evidence set forth in the papers, except the evidence to which objections have been made and sustained by the court, and all inferences reasonably deducible from the evidence, except summary judgment shall not be granted by the court based on inferences reasonably deducible from the evidence if contradicted by other inferences or evidence that raise a triable issue as to any material fact.
(d)Supporting and opposing affidavits or declarations shall be made by a person on personal knowledge, shall set forth admissible evidence, and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated in the affidavits or declarations. An objection based on the failure to comply with the requirements of this subdivision, if not made at the hearing, shall be deemed waived.
(e)If a party is otherwise entitled to summary judgment pursuant to this section, summary judgment shall not be denied on grounds of credibility or for want of cross-examination of witnesses furnishing affidavits or declarations in support of the summary judgment, except that summary judgment may be denied in the discretion of the court if the only proof of a material fact offered in support of the summary judgment is an affidavit or declaration made by an individual who was the sole witness to that fact; or if a material fact is an individuals state of mind, or lack thereof, and that fact is sought to be established solely by the individuals affirmation thereof.
(f)(1)A party may move for summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action within an action, one or more affirmative defenses, one or more claims for damages, or one or more issues of duty, if the party contends that the cause of action has no merit, that there is no affirmative defense to the cause of action, that there is no merit to an affirmative defense as to any cause of action, that there is no merit to a claim for damages, as specified in Section 3294 of the Civil Code, or that one or more defendants either owed or did not owe a duty to the plaintiff or plaintiffs. A motion for summary adjudication shall be granted only if it completely disposes of a cause of action, an affirmative defense, a claim for damages, or an issue of duty.
(2)A motion for summary adjudication may be made by itself or as an alternative to a motion for summary judgment and shall proceed in all procedural respects as a motion for summary judgment. A party shall not move for summary judgment based on issues asserted in a prior motion for summary adjudication and denied by the court unless that party establishes, to the satisfaction of the court, newly discovered facts or circumstances or a change of law supporting the issues reasserted in the summary judgment motion.
(g)Upon the denial of a motion for summary judgment on the ground that there is a triable issue as to one or more material facts, the court shall, by written or oral order, specify one or more material facts raised by the motion that the court has determined there exists a triable controversy. This determination shall specifically refer to the evidence proffered in support of and in opposition to the motion that indicates that a triable controversy exists. Upon the grant of a motion for summary judgment on the ground that there is no triable issue of material fact, the court shall, by written or oral order, specify the reasons for its determination. The order shall specifically refer to the evidence proffered in support of and, if applicable, in opposition to the motion that indicates no triable issue exists. The court shall also state its reasons for any other determination. The court shall record its determination by court reporter or written order.
(h)If it appears from the affidavits submitted in opposition to a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication, or both, that facts essential to justify opposition may exist but cannot, for reasons stated, be presented, the court shall deny the motion, order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or discovery to be had, or make any other order as may be just. The application to continue the motion to obtain necessary discovery may also be made by ex parte motion at any time on or before the date the opposition response to the motion is due.
(i)If, after granting a continuance to allow specified additional discovery, the court determines that the party seeking summary judgment has unreasonably failed to allow the discovery to be conducted, the court shall grant a continuance to permit the discovery to go forward or deny the motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication. This section does not affect or limit the ability of a party to compel discovery under the Civil Discovery Act (Title 4 (commencing with Section 2016.010) of Part 4).
(j)If the court determines at any time that an affidavit was presented in bad faith or solely for the purpose of delay, the court shall order the party who presented the affidavit to pay the other party the amount of the reasonable expenses the filing of the affidavit caused the other party to incur. Sanctions shall not be imposed pursuant to this subdivision except on notice contained in a partys papers or on the courts own noticed motion, and after an opportunity to be heard.
(k)Unless a separate judgment may properly be awarded in the action, a final judgment shall not be entered on a motion for summary judgment before the termination of the action, but the final judgment shall, in addition to any matters determined in the action, award judgment as established by the summary proceeding provided for in this section.
(l)In an action arising out of an injury to the person or to property, if a motion for summary judgment is granted on the basis that the defendant was without fault, no other defendant during trial, over plaintiffs objection, may attempt to attribute fault to, or comment on, the absence or involvement of the defendant who was granted the motion.
(m)(1)A summary judgment entered under this section is an appealable judgment as in other cases. Upon entry of an order pursuant to this section, except the entry of summary judgment, a party may, within 20 days after service upon him or her the party of a written notice of entry of the order, petition an appropriate reviewing court for a peremptory writ. If the notice is served by mail, the initial period within which to file the petition shall be increased by five days if the place of address is within the State of California, 10 days if the place of address is outside the State of California but within the United States, and 20 days if the place of address is outside the United States. If the notice is served by facsimile transmission, express mail, or another method of delivery providing for overnight delivery, the initial period within which to file the petition shall be increased by two court days. The superior court may, for good cause, and before the expiration of the initial period, extend the time for one additional period not to exceed 10 days.
(2)Before a reviewing court affirms an order granting summary judgment or summary adjudication on a ground not relied upon by the trial court, the reviewing court shall afford the parties an opportunity to present their views on the issue by submitting supplemental briefs. The supplemental briefs may include an argument that additional evidence relating to that ground exists, but the party has not had an adequate opportunity to present the evidence or to conduct discovery on the issue. The court may reverse or remand based upon the supplemental briefs to allow the parties to present additional evidence or to conduct discovery on the issue. If the court fails to allow supplemental briefs, a rehearing shall be ordered upon timely petition of a party.
(n)(1)If a motion for summary adjudication is granted, at the trial of the action, the cause or causes of action within the action, affirmative defense or defenses, claim for damages, or issue or issues of duty as to the motion that has been granted shall be deemed to be established and the action shall proceed as to the cause or causes of action, affirmative defense or defenses, claim for damages, or issue or issues of duty remaining.
(2)In the trial of the action, the fact that a motion for summary adjudication is granted as to one or more causes of action, affirmative defenses, claims for damages, or issues of duty within the action shall not bar any cause of action, affirmative defense, claim for damages, or issue of duty as to which summary adjudication was either not sought or denied.
(3)In the trial of an action, neither a party, a witness, nor the court shall comment to a jury upon the grant or denial of a motion for summary adjudication.
(o)A cause of action has no merit if either of the following exists:
(1)One or more of the elements of the cause of action cannot be separately established, even if that element is separately pleaded.
(2)A defendant establishes an affirmative defense to that cause of action.
(p)For purposes of motions for summary judgment and summary adjudication:
(1)A plaintiff or cross-complainant has met his or her that partys burden of showing that there is no defense to a cause of action if that party has proved each element of the cause of action entitling the party to judgment on the cause of action. Once the plaintiff or cross-complainant has met that burden, the burden shifts to the defendant or cross-defendant to show that a triable issue of one or more material facts exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto. The defendant or cross-defendant shall not rely upon the allegations or denials of its pleadings to show that a triable issue of material fact exists but, instead, shall set forth the specific facts showing that a triable issue of material fact exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto.
(2)A defendant or cross-defendant has met his or her that partys burden of showing that a cause of action has no merit if the party has shown that one or more elements of the cause of action, even if not separately pleaded, cannot be established, or that there is a complete defense to the cause of action. Once the defendant or cross-defendant has met that burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff or cross-complainant to show that a triable issue of one or more material facts exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto. The plaintiff or cross-complainant shall not rely upon the allegations or denials of its pleadings to show that a triable issue of material fact exists but, instead, shall set forth the specific facts showing that a triable issue of material fact exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto.
(q)In granting or denying a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication, the court need rule only on those objections to evidence that it deems material to its disposition of the motion. Objections to evidence that are not ruled on for purposes of the motion shall be preserved for appellate review.
(r)This section does not extend the period for trial provided by Section 1170.5.
(s)Subdivisions (a) and (b) do not apply to actions brought pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 1159) of Title 3 of Part 3.
(t)Notwithstanding subdivision (f), a party may move for summary adjudication of a legal issue or a claim for damages other than punitive damages that does not completely dispose of a cause of action, affirmative defense, or issue of duty pursuant to this subdivision.
(1)(A)Before filing a motion pursuant to this subdivision, the parties whose claims or defenses are put at issue by the motion shall submit to the court both of the following:
(i)A joint stipulation stating the issue or issues to be adjudicated.
(ii)A declaration from each stipulating party that the motion will further the interest of judicial economy by decreasing trial time or significantly increasing the likelihood of settlement.
(B)The joint stipulation shall be served on any party to the civil action who is not also a party to the motion.
(2)Within 15 days of receipt of the stipulation and declarations, unless the court has good cause for extending the time, the court shall notify the stipulating parties if the motion may be filed. In making this determination, the court may consider objections by a nonstipulating party made within 10 days of the submission of the stipulation and declarations.
(3)If the court elects not to allow the filing of the motion, the stipulating parties may request, and upon request the court shall conduct, an informal conference with the stipulating parties to permit further evaluation of the proposed stipulation. The stipulating parties shall not file additional papers in support of the motion.
(4)(A)A motion for summary adjudication made pursuant to this subdivision shall contain a statement in the notice of motion that reads substantially similar to the following: This motion is made pursuant to subdivision (t) of Section 437c of the Code of Civil Procedure. The parties to this motion stipulate that the court shall hear this motion and that the resolution of this motion will further the interest of judicial economy by decreasing trial time or significantly increasing the likelihood of settlement.
(B)The notice of motion shall be signed by counsel for all parties, and by those parties in propria persona, to the motion.
(5)A motion filed pursuant to this subdivision may be made by itself or as an alternative to a motion for summary judgment and shall proceed in all procedural respects as a motion for summary judgment.
(u)For purposes of this section, a change in law does not include a later enacted statute without retroactive application.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2024 | Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 99, Statutes of 2024. |
| Jul 15, 2024 | Approved by the Governor. |
| Jul 1, 2024 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m. |
| Jun 20, 2024 | In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling. |
| Jun 20, 2024 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 4624.). |
| Jun 13, 2024 | Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar. |
| Jun 12, 2024 | From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 11). |
| May 22, 2024 | Referred to Com. on JUD. |
| May 9, 2024 | In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. |
| May 9, 2024 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 65. Noes 0. Page 5157.) |
| May 2, 2024 | Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar. |
| May 1, 2024 | From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 30). |
| Apr 29, 2024 | Re-referred to Com. on JUD. |
| Apr 25, 2024 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended. |
| Feb 12, 2024 | Referred to Com. on JUD. |
| Feb 2, 2024 | From printer. May be heard in committee March 3. |
| Feb 1, 2024 | Read first time. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2024 | Consent Calendar 2nd AB2049 Pacheco | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Jun 11, 2024 | Do pass and be ordered to the Consent Calendar | Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary |
Passed |
|
| May 9, 2024 | AB 2049 Pacheco Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Apr 30, 2024 | Do pass. To Consent Calendar. | Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| California Defense Counsel | ** Support | |
| California Judges Association | ** Support | |
| Conference of California Bar Associations | ** Support | |
| Consumer Attorneys Of California | ** Support | |
| Judicial Council of California | ** Support |
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | AB 2049 |
CONSENT
Bill No: AB 2049
Author: Pacheco (D)
Amended: 4/25/24 in Assembly
Vote: 21
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE: 11-0, 6/11/24
AYES: Umberg, Wilk, Allen, Ashby, Caballero, Durazo, Laird, Niello, Roth, Stern, Wahab
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 65-0, 5/9/24 (Consent) - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Motions for summary judgment: filing deadlines
SOURCE: California Defense Counsel
California Judges Association
Conference of California Bar Associations
DIGEST:
This bill increases the deadlines for filing motions for summary judgment and responsive pleadings by six days. This bill limits parties to only one such motion unless there is good cause. This bill prohibits the reply brief from including any new evidentiary matter, additional material facts, or separate statements, not previously presented in the motion or opposition briefs.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- Authorizes a party to move for summary judgment in an action or proceeding if it is contended that the action has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding, so long as the motion is made at any time after 60 days have elapsed since the general appearance in the action or proceeding of each party against whom the motion is directed or at any earlier time after the general appearance that the court, with or without notice and upon good cause shown, may direct. (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(a)(1).)[1]
- Requires the notice of the motion for summary judgment and supporting papers to be served on all other parties to the action at least 75 days before the time appointed for hearing, except as specified. (§437c(a)(2).)
- Provides that an opposition to a motion for summary judgment must be served and filed not less than 14 days preceding the noticed or continued date of the summary judgment hearing, barring a good cause finding by the court. A reply to the opposition to the motion for summary judgment must be served and filed by the moving party not less than five days preceding the noticed or continued date of the summary judgment hearing, barring a good cause finding by the court. (§ 437c(b).)
- Provides that a party may move for summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action within an action, if the party contends that the cause of action has no merit. Establishes that a motion for summary adjudication is granted only if it completely disposes of a cause of action, an affirmative defense, a claim for damages, or an issue of duty. (§ 437c(f)(1).)
This bill:
- Increases the deadline to notice a motion for summary judgment from 75 to 81 days before the time appointed for the summary judgment hearing. The deadline for filing the opposition and reply briefs are similarly lengthened by six days.
- Prohibits a party from bringing more than one motion for summary judgment against an adverse party except upon a showing of good cause. This does not apply to summary adjudication.
- Prohibits a reply to the opposition to the motion for summary judgment from including new evidentiary matter, additional material facts, or separate statement submitted with the reply and not presented in the moving papers or opposing papers.
Background
Currently, a party may move for summary judgment in an action or proceeding if it is contended that the action has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding. The motion may be made at any time after 60 days have elapsed since the party’s first appearance and the notice of motion and supporting papers must be served at least 75 days before the hearing on the motion, with some bases for extensions. Any opposition to the motion must be served at least 14 days before the hearing date. The moving party’s reply brief must be served and filed at least five days before the hearing.
In order to allow more time to consider these important, potentially dispositive motions, this bill extends the timeline within which the motion, opposition, and reply must be filed by six days, providing additional time before the hearing date for the court to consider them. This bill also codifies best practices by limiting parties to only one motion for summary judgment absent good cause and preventing a party from introducing new evidence or facts for the first time in the reply brief.
This bill is co-sponsored by California Defense Counsel, the California Judges Association, and the Conference of California Bar Associations.
Comments
After the filing of a lawsuit, either party to an action may move for summary judgment by contending that the action has no merit or that there is no defense thereto. Essentially, the party filing the motion is claiming that all necessary factual issues are resolved and need not be tried by the court because they are so one-sided. A motion for summary judgment must be supported or opposed by admissible evidence such as affidavits, declarations, admissions, answers to interrogatories, depositions, and requests for judicial notice, as appropriate. In determining whether the papers show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact, the court must consider all of the evidence set forth in the papers, except evidence to which objections have been made and sustained by the court. If the court finds that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law, then the motion must be granted (which generally disposes of the whole case). If an issue of fact is presented the court must permit trial thereof, though it may also find that certain other issues “are without substantial controversy” and grant summary adjudication as to those issues. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 437c.) In short, the purpose of the summary procedure is to provide a method for prompt disposition of actions in which there is no triable, material issue of fact on which evidence shall be taken.
The law sets out specific timelines for filing and responding to such motions. Currently, the motion may be filed anytime after 60 days have elapsed since the general appearance of the responding party. The motion must be served with supporting papers at least 75 days before the hearing. Opposition to the motion must be filed within 61 days thereafter, or 14 days preceding the hearing date on the motion. The reply brief must be filed not less than five days prior to the hearing.
Providing more time to consider motions for summary judgment. According to the author:
Summary judgment motions are critical tools for courts to eliminate meritless lawsuits or defenses to lawsuits. The problem is that the timeframes for filing oppositions to summary judgment motions, and for filing replies to those oppositions, is so close to the hearings on the motions that judges simply do not have the time to give the pleadings the evaluation they deserve. Modest amendments to those timeframes can give judges the time they need and allow summary judgment motions to fulfill their intended purpose. AB 2049 adds 6 calendar days to the timelines for filing and replying to summary judgment motions.
We have worked with stakeholders on amendments to codify existing case law and best practices by limiting summary judgment motions to one motion per party, per case unless permission by the court is granted for additional motions, and by clarifying that replies to summary judgment oppositions cannot raise new evidence or material facts not presented in the motion or opposition.
As stated, this bill provides the court an additional six days to consider the motion for summary judgment and its supporting papers. To ensure there is no gamesmanship or abuse of the process, this bill also codifies what amount to best practices by prohibiting multiple motions for summary judgment by a party and prohibiting the introduction of new evidentiary matters or facts not previously presented.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No Local: No
SUPPORT: (Verified 6/13/24)
California Defense Counsel (source)
California Judges Association (source)
Conference of California Bar Associations (source)
Judicial Council of California
OPPOSITION: (Verified 6/13/24)
None received
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The co-sponsors of this bill, California Defense Counsel, the California Judges Association, and the Conference of California Bar Associations, write:
AB 2049 makes the first structural change to CCP Section 437c in 20 years. Most importantly, the bill modifies the timeline for noticing a motion for summary judgment from 75 to 81 calendar days before the hearing on the motion; the timeline for submitting an opposition to the motion from 14 calendar days to 20 calendar days before the hearing, and the timeline for submitting a reply to an opposition from 5 to 11 calendar days before the hearing. This simple change is designed to address a problem with current law, which “backloads” the deadlines to submit replies too close to summary judgment hearings, leaving judges with insufficient time to thoughtfully evaluate these important motions.
Working with the Consumer Attorneys of California, we have agreed on language to address two other important summary judgment issues. First, the bill limits the number of summary judgment motions which can be filed to one per party, per case, with an allowance for additional motions upon leave of the court based upon good cause. This is designed to prevent repetitive or unnecessary motions and merely codifies the understanding and practice of most courts and attorneys.
Second, AB 2049 clarifies that replies to summary judgment oppositions should not raise new evidence or new material facts not presented in the motion itself or in oppositions. This provision balances the interests of plaintiffs and defense by preventing replies from surprising opponents with new material never before included in motion papers, but also permitting replies to address any new material raised in oppositions.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 65-0, 5/9/24
AYES: Addis, Aguiar-Curry, Alanis, Alvarez, Arambula, Bauer-Kahan, Bennett, Berman, Boerner, Bonta, Bryan, Calderon, Juan Carrillo, Wendy Carrillo, Chen, Connolly, Davies, Dixon, Essayli, Mike Fong, Vince Fong, Friedman, Gallagher, Garcia, Gipson, Hart, Holden, Hoover, Irwin, Jackson, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Lackey, Lee, Lowenthal, Maienschein, McCarty, McKinnor, Muratsuchi, Ortega, Pacheco, Papan, Jim Patterson, Joe Patterson, Pellerin, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Rendon, Reyes, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Sanchez, Santiago, Soria, Ta, Valencia, Villapudua, Waldron, Ward, Weber, Wicks, Wilson, Wood, Zbur, Robert Rivas
NO VOTE RECORDED: Bains, Cervantes, Megan Dahle, Flora, Gabriel, Grayson, Haney, Low, Mathis, Stephanie Nguyen, Petrie-Norris, Luz Rivas, Schiavo, Ting, Wallis
Prepared by: Christian Kurpiewski / JUD. / (916) 651-4113
6/13/24 13:55:01
**** END ****
All further statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure unless otherwise stated. ↑
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | AB 2049 |
CONSENT
Bill No: AB 2049
Author: Pacheco (D)
Amended: 4/25/24 in Assembly
Vote: 21
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE: 11-0, 6/11/24
AYES: Umberg, Wilk, Allen, Ashby, Caballero, Durazo, Laird, Niello, Roth, Stern, Wahab
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 65-0, 5/9/24 (Consent) - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Motions for summary judgment: filing deadlines
SOURCE: California Defense Counsel
California Judges Association
Conference of California Bar Associations
DIGEST:
This bill increases the deadlines for filing motions for summary judgment and responsive pleadings by six days. This bill limits parties to only one such motion unless there is good cause. This bill prohibits the reply brief from including any new evidentiary matter, additional material facts, or separate statements, not previously presented in the motion or opposition briefs.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- Authorizes a party to move for summary judgment in an action or proceeding if it is contended that the action has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding, so long as the motion is made at any time after 60 days have elapsed since the general appearance in the action or proceeding of each party against whom the motion is directed or at any earlier time after the general appearance that the court, with or without notice and upon good cause shown, may direct. (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(a)(1).)[1]
- Requires the notice of the motion for summary judgment and supporting papers to be served on all other parties to the action at least 75 days before the time appointed for hearing, except as specified. (§437c(a)(2).)
- Provides that an opposition to a motion for summary judgment must be served and filed not less than 14 days preceding the noticed or continued date of the summary judgment hearing, barring a good cause finding by the court. A reply to the opposition to the motion for summary judgment must be served and filed by the moving party not less than five days preceding the noticed or continued date of the summary judgment hearing, barring a good cause finding by the court. (§ 437c(b).)
- Provides that a party may move for summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action within an action, if the party contends that the cause of action has no merit. Establishes that a motion for summary adjudication is granted only if it completely disposes of a cause of action, an affirmative defense, a claim for damages, or an issue of duty. (§ 437c(f)(1).)
This bill:
- Increases the deadline to notice a motion for summary judgment from 75 to 81 days before the time appointed for the summary judgment hearing. The deadline for filing the opposition and reply briefs are similarly lengthened by six days.
- Prohibits a party from bringing more than one motion for summary judgment against an adverse party except upon a showing of good cause. This does not apply to summary adjudication.
- Prohibits a reply to the opposition to the motion for summary judgment from including new evidentiary matter, additional material facts, or separate statement submitted with the reply and not presented in the moving papers or opposing papers.
Background
Currently, a party may move for summary judgment in an action or proceeding if it is contended that the action has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding. The motion may be made at any time after 60 days have elapsed since the party’s first appearance and the notice of motion and supporting papers must be served at least 75 days before the hearing on the motion, with some bases for extensions. Any opposition to the motion must be served at least 14 days before the hearing date. The moving party’s reply brief must be served and filed at least five days before the hearing.
In order to allow more time to consider these important, potentially dispositive motions, this bill extends the timeline within which the motion, opposition, and reply must be filed by six days, providing additional time before the hearing date for the court to consider them. This bill also codifies best practices by limiting parties to only one motion for summary judgment absent good cause and preventing a party from introducing new evidence or facts for the first time in the reply brief.
This bill is co-sponsored by California Defense Counsel, the California Judges Association, and the Conference of California Bar Associations.
Comments
After the filing of a lawsuit, either party to an action may move for summary judgment by contending that the action has no merit or that there is no defense thereto. Essentially, the party filing the motion is claiming that all necessary factual issues are resolved and need not be tried by the court because they are so one-sided. A motion for summary judgment must be supported or opposed by admissible evidence such as affidavits, declarations, admissions, answers to interrogatories, depositions, and requests for judicial notice, as appropriate. In determining whether the papers show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact, the court must consider all of the evidence set forth in the papers, except evidence to which objections have been made and sustained by the court. If the court finds that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law, then the motion must be granted (which generally disposes of the whole case). If an issue of fact is presented the court must permit trial thereof, though it may also find that certain other issues “are without substantial controversy” and grant summary adjudication as to those issues. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 437c.) In short, the purpose of the summary procedure is to provide a method for prompt disposition of actions in which there is no triable, material issue of fact on which evidence shall be taken.
The law sets out specific timelines for filing and responding to such motions. Currently, the motion may be filed anytime after 60 days have elapsed since the general appearance of the responding party. The motion must be served with supporting papers at least 75 days before the hearing. Opposition to the motion must be filed within 61 days thereafter, or 14 days preceding the hearing date on the motion. The reply brief must be filed not less than five days prior to the hearing.
Providing more time to consider motions for summary judgment. According to the author:
Summary judgment motions are critical tools for courts to eliminate meritless lawsuits or defenses to lawsuits. The problem is that the timeframes for filing oppositions to summary judgment motions, and for filing replies to those oppositions, is so close to the hearings on the motions that judges simply do not have the time to give the pleadings the evaluation they deserve. Modest amendments to those timeframes can give judges the time they need and allow summary judgment motions to fulfill their intended purpose. AB 2049 adds 6 calendar days to the timelines for filing and replying to summary judgment motions.
We have worked with stakeholders on amendments to codify existing case law and best practices by limiting summary judgment motions to one motion per party, per case unless permission by the court is granted for additional motions, and by clarifying that replies to summary judgment oppositions cannot raise new evidence or material facts not presented in the motion or opposition.
As stated, this bill provides the court an additional six days to consider the motion for summary judgment and its supporting papers. To ensure there is no gamesmanship or abuse of the process, this bill also codifies what amount to best practices by prohibiting multiple motions for summary judgment by a party and prohibiting the introduction of new evidentiary matters or facts not previously presented.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No Local: No
SUPPORT: (Verified 6/13/24)
California Defense Counsel (co-source)
California Judges Association (co-source)
Conference of California Bar Associations (co-source)
Judicial Council of California
OPPOSITION: (Verified 6/13/24)
None received
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The co-sponsors of this bill, California Defense Counsel, the California Judges Association, and the Conference of California Bar Associations, write:
AB 2049 makes the first structural change to CCP Section 437c in 20 years. Most importantly, the bill modifies the timeline for noticing a motion for summary judgment from 75 to 81 calendar days before the hearing on the motion; the timeline for submitting an opposition to the motion from 14 calendar days to 20 calendar days before the hearing, and the timeline for submitting a reply to an opposition from 5 to 11 calendar days before the hearing. This simple change is designed to address a problem with current law, which “backloads” the deadlines to submit replies too close to summary judgment hearings, leaving judges with insufficient time to thoughtfully evaluate these important motions.
Working with the Consumer Attorneys of California, we have agreed on language to address two other important summary judgment issues. First, the bill limits the number of summary judgment motions which can be filed to one per party, per case, with an allowance for additional motions upon leave of the court based upon good cause. This is designed to prevent repetitive or unnecessary motions and merely codifies the understanding and practice of most courts and attorneys.
Second, AB 2049 clarifies that replies to summary judgment oppositions should not raise new evidence or new material facts not presented in the motion itself or in oppositions. This provision balances the interests of plaintiffs and defense by preventing replies from surprising opponents with new material never before included in motion papers, but also permitting replies to address any new material raised in oppositions.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 65-0, 5/9/24
AYES: Addis, Aguiar-Curry, Alanis, Alvarez, Arambula, Bauer-Kahan, Bennett, Berman, Boerner, Bonta, Bryan, Calderon, Juan Carrillo, Wendy Carrillo, Chen, Connolly, Davies, Dixon, Essayli, Mike Fong, Vince Fong, Friedman, Gallagher, Garcia, Gipson, Hart, Holden, Hoover, Irwin, Jackson, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Lackey, Lee, Lowenthal, Maienschein, McCarty, McKinnor, Muratsuchi, Ortega, Pacheco, Papan, Jim Patterson, Joe Patterson, Pellerin, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Rendon, Reyes, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Sanchez, Santiago, Soria, Ta, Valencia, Villapudua, Waldron, Ward, Weber, Wicks, Wilson, Wood, Zbur, Robert Rivas
NO VOTE RECORDED: Bains, Cervantes, Megan Dahle, Flora, Gabriel, Grayson, Haney, Low, Mathis, Stephanie Nguyen, Petrie-Norris, Luz Rivas, Schiavo, Ting, Wallis
Prepared by: Christian Kurpiewski / JUD. / (916) 651-4113
6/13/24 15:13:31
**** END ****
All further statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure unless otherwise stated. ↑
Senator Thomas Umberg, Chair
2023-2024 Regular Session
Bill No: AB 2049 (Author:Pacheco)
Version: April 25, 2024
Hearing Date: June 11, 2024
Fiscal: No
Urgency: No
Consultant: CK
SUBJECT
Motions for summary judgment: filing deadlines
DIGEST
This bill increases the deadlines for filing motions for summary judgment and responsive pleadings by six days. The bill limits parties to only one such motion unless there is good cause. The bill prohibits the reply brief from including any new evidentiary matter, additional material facts, or separate statements, not previously presented in the motion or opposition briefs.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Currently, a party may move for summary judgment in an action or proceeding if it is contended that the action has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding. The motion may be made at any time after 60 days have elapsed since the party’s first appearance and the notice of motion and supporting papers must be served at least 75 days before the hearing on the motion, with some bases for extensions. Any opposition to the motion must be served at least 14 days before the hearing date. The moving party’s reply brief must be served and filed at least five days before the hearing.
In order to allow more time to consider these important, potentially dispositive motions, this bill extends the timeline within which the motion, opposition, and reply must be filed by six days, providing additional time before the hearing date for the court to consider them. The bill also codifies best practices by limiting parties to only one motion for summary judgment absent good cause and preventing a party from introducing new evidence or facts for the first time in the reply brief.
This bill is co-sponsored by California Defense Counsel, the California Judges Association, and the Conference of California Bar Associations. The Committee received no timely opposition.
PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE LAW
Existing law:
- Authorizes a party to move for summary judgment in an action or proceeding if it is contended that the action has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding, so long as the motion is made at any time after 60 days have elapsed since the general appearance in the action or proceeding of each party against whom the motion is directed or at any earlier time after the general appearance that the court, with or without notice and upon good cause shown, may direct. (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(a)(1).)[1]
- Requires the notice of the motion for summary judgment and supporting papers to be served on all other parties to the action at least 75 days before the time appointed for hearing, except as specified. (§437c(a)(2).)
- Provides that an opposition to a motion for summary judgment must be served and filed not less than 14 days preceding the noticed or continued date of the summary judgment hearing, barring a good cause finding by the court. A reply to the opposition to the motion for summary judgment must be served and filed by the moving party not less than five days preceding the noticed or continued date of the summary judgment hearing, barring a good cause finding by the court. (§ 437c(b).)
- Provides that a party may move for summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action within an action, if the party contends that the cause of action has no merit. Establishes that a motion for summary adjudication is granted only if it completely disposes of a cause of action, an affirmative defense, a claim for damages, or an issue of duty. (§ 437c(f)(1).)
This bill:
- Increases the deadline to notice a motion for summary judgment from 75 to 81 days before the time appointed for the summary judgment hearing. The deadline for filing the opposition and reply briefs are similarly lengthened by six days.
- Prohibits a party from bringing more than one motion for summary judgment against an adverse party except upon a showing of good cause. This does not apply to summary adjudication.
- Prohibits a reply to the opposition to the motion for summary judgment from including new evidentiary matter, additional material facts, or separate statement submitted with the reply and not presented in the moving papers or opposing papers.
COMMENTS
- Motions for summary judgment
After the filing of a lawsuit, either party to an action may move for summary judgment by contending that the action has no merit or that there is no defense thereto. Essentially, the party filing the motion is claiming that all necessary factual issues are resolved and need not be tried by the court because they are so one-sided. A motion for summary judgment must be supported or opposed by admissible evidence such as affidavits, declarations, admissions, answers to interrogatories, depositions, and requests for judicial notice, as appropriate. In determining whether the papers show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact, the court must consider all of the evidence set forth in the papers, except evidence to which objections have been made and sustained by the court. If the court finds that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law, then the motion must be granted (which generally disposes of the whole case). If an issue of fact is presented the court must permit trial thereof, though it may also find that certain other issues “are without substantial controversy” and grant summary adjudication as to those issues. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 437c.) In short, the purpose of the summary procedure is to provide a method for prompt disposition of actions in which there is no triable, material issue of fact on which evidence shall be taken.
The law sets out specific timelines for filing and responding to such motions. Currently, the motion may be filed anytime after 60 days have elapsed since the general appearance of the responding party. The motion must be served with supporting papers at least 75 days before the hearing. Opposition to the motion must be filed within 61 days thereafter, or 14 days preceding the hearing date on the motion. The reply brief must be filed not less than five days prior to the hearing.
- Providing more time to consider motions for summary judgment
According to the author:
Summary judgment motions are critical tools for courts to eliminate meritless lawsuits or defenses to lawsuits. The problem is that the timeframes for filing oppositions to summary judgment motions, and for filing replies to those oppositions, is so close to the hearings on the motions that judges simply do not have the time to give the pleadings the evaluation they deserve. Modest amendments to those timeframes can give judges the time they need and allow summary judgment motions to fulfill their intended purpose. AB 2049 adds 6 calendar days to the timelines for filing and replying to summary judgment motions.
We have worked with stakeholders on amendments to codify existing case law and best practices by limiting summary judgment motions to one motion per party, per case unless permission by the court is granted for additional motions, and by clarifying that replies to summary judgment oppositions cannot raise new evidence or material facts not presented in the motion or opposition.
As stated, the bill provides the court an additional six days to consider the motion for summary judgment and its supporting papers. To ensure there is no gamesmanship or abuse of the process, the bill also codifies what amount to best practices by prohibiting multiple motions for summary judgment by a party and prohibiting the introduction of new evidentiary matters or facts not previously presented.
The co-sponsors of the bill, California Defense Counsel, the California Judges Association, and the Conference of California Bar Associations, write:
AB 2049 makes the first structural change to CCP Section 437c in 20 years. Most importantly, the bill modifies the timeline for noticing a motion for summary judgment from 75 to 81 calendar days before the hearing on the motion; the timeline for submitting an opposition to the motion from 14 calendar days to 20 calendar days before the hearing, and the timeline for submitting a reply to an opposition from 5 to 11 calendar days before the hearing. This simple change is designed to address a problem with current law, which “backloads” the deadlines to submit replies too close to summary judgment hearings, leaving judges with insufficient time to thoughtfully evaluate these important motions.
Working with the Consumer Attorneys of California, we have agreed on language to address two other important summary judgment issues. First, the bill limits the number of summary judgment motions which can be filed to one per party, per case, with an allowance for additional motions upon leave of the court based upon good cause. This is designed to prevent repetitive or unnecessary motions and merely codifies the understanding and practice of most courts and attorneys.
Second, AB 2049 clarifies that replies to summary judgment oppositions should not raise new evidence or new material facts not presented in the motion itself or in oppositions. This provision balances the interests of plaintiffs and defense by preventing replies from surprising opponents with new material never before included in motion papers, but also permitting replies to address any new material raised in oppositions.
SUPPORT
California Defense Counsel (sponsor)
California Judges Association (sponsor)
Conference of California Bar Associations (sponsor)
OPPOSITION
None received
RELATED LEGISLATION
Pending Legislation: None known.
Prior Legislation:
SB 470 (Jackson, Ch. 161, Stats. 2015) provided that, in granting or denying a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication, the court need rule only on objections made to evidence that the court deems material to the disposition of the motion. It also provided that objections to evidence not ruled on for purposes of the motion shall be preserved for appellate review.
AB 1141 (Chau, Ch. 345, Stats. 2015) reenacted a provision allowing parties to stipulate to summary adjudication of an issue that does not dispose of a cause of action, upon approval of the court, as specified, that had sunset.
PRIOR VOTES:
Assembly Floor (Ayes 65, Noes 0)
Assembly Judiciary Committee (Ayes 12, Noes 0)
**************
All further statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure unless otherwise stated. ↑
Date of Hearing: April 30, 2024
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
Ash Kalra, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 2049
Author:(Pacheco) – As Amended Ver:April 25, 2024
PROPOSED CONSENT
SUBJECT: Motions for summary judgment: filing deadlines
KEY ISSUE: should the deadlines and rules regarding motions for summary judgment be amended in order to ensure a more efficient, thorough and just process?
SYNOPSIS
Summary judgment motions are critical tools for courts to eliminate meritless lawsuits or defenses to lawsuits. Under existing law, a motion for summary judgment must be filed 75 days before the noticed hearing, with the opposition due 14 days before the noticed hearing, and the reply due nine days after that – leaving the court with five days before the hearing date to evaluate the reply. The co-sponsors of this measure, the California Defense Counsel, the Conference of California Bar and the California Judges Association, argue that the timeframes for filing oppositions to summary judgment motions, and for filing replies to those oppositions, is so close to the hearings on the motions that judges simply do not have the time to give the pleadings the evaluation they deserve. This bill seeks to resolve that concern by adjusting the motion for summary judgement timelines by moving up the notice deadline by six days and adjusting all other deadlines to allow for the judges to have an additional six days to review and consider the defendant’s reply. The co-sponsors of this measure have reached consensus with the Consumer Attorneys of California by adding two summary judgment-related amendments to the bill. In addition to the extended timeline discussed above, this measure prohibits the defendant from bringing multiple motions for summary judgment absent good cause and clarifies that a defendant’s reply brief must not include any new evidentiary matter, additional material facts, or separate statement not presented in the defendant’s moving papers or the plaintiff’s opposing papers. With these additional protections in place, there is no known opposition to the measure. The parties have indicated that they intend to continue working together regarding a reservation system for motions for summary judgment hearings.
SUMMARY: Amends the timeline and rules governing motions for summary judgment. Specifically, this bill:
- Increases the deadline to notice a motion for summary judgment from 75 to 81 days before the time appointed for the summary judgment hearing.
- Increases the deadline for filing an opposition to the motion for summary judgment from 14 to 20 days before the noticed date of the summary judgment hearing.
- Increases the deadline for filing a reply to the opposition to the motion for summary judgment from 5 to 11 days before the noticed date of the summary judgment hearing.
- Prohibits a party from bringing more than one motion for summary judgment against an adverse party.
- Establishes that the prohibition in 4) does not apply to summary adjudication.
- Establishes that notwithstanding the prohibition in 5), a court may grant leave for the moving party to file an additional motion for summary judgment upon a showing of good cause.
- Prohibits a reply to the opposition to the motion for summary judgment from including new evidentiary matter, additional material facts, or separate statement submitted with the reply and not presented in the moving papers or opposing papers.
EXISTING LAW:
- Provides that a party may move for summary judgment in an action or proceeding if it is contended that the action has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding, so long as the motion is made at any time after 60 days have elapsed since the general appearance in the action or proceeding of each party against whom the motion is directed or at any earlier time after the general appearance that the court, with or without notice and upon good cause shown, may direct. (Code of Civil Procedure Section 437c (a)(1). All further statutory references are to this code unless noted otherwise.)
- Provides that the notice of the motion for summary judgment and supporting papers must be served on all other parties to the action at least 75 days before the time appointed for hearing. If the notice is served by mail, the required 75-day period of notice is increased by 5 days if the place of address is within the State of California, 10 days if the place of address is outside the State of California but within the United States, and 20 days if the place of address is outside the United States. (Section 437c (a)(2).)
- Provides that an opposition to a motion for summary judgment must be served and filed not less than 14 days preceding the noticed or continued date of the summary judgment hearing, barring a good cause finding by the court. (Section 437c (b)(2).)
- Provides that a reply to the opposition to the motion for summary judgment must be served and filed by the moving party not less than five days preceding the noticed or continued date of the summary judgment hearing, barring a good cause finding by the court. (Section 437c (b)(4).)
- Provides that a party may move for summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action within an action, if the party contends that the cause of action has no merit. Establishes that a motion for summary adjudication is granted only if it completely disposes of a cause of action, an affirmative defense, a claim for damages, or an issue of duty. (Section 437c (f)(1).)
- Provides that a party may not move for summary judgment based on issues asserted in a prior motion for summary adjudication and denied by the court, unless that party establishes to the satisfaction of the court, newly discovered facts or circumstances or a change of law supporting the issues reasserted in the summary judgment motion. (Section 437f (f)(2).)
FISCAL EFFECT: As currently in print this bill is keyed non-fiscal.
COMMENTS: This measure represents a compromise among judicial professionals, including the Consumer Attorneys of California (CAOC), the California Defense Counsel, and the California Judges Association to improve the rules regarding summary judgment in state court. The author explains:
AB 2049 addresses a vexing and consequential element in summary judgment motions in civil litigation. When filed by defendants, summary judgment motions argue that a legal action has no merit; when filed by plaintiffs, the motions argue that a legal action has no defense. Summary judgment is critical in civil procedure because the motions help courts weed out non-meritorious claims, thus reducing court backlog. But because summary judgment may dispose of a case without trial, the motions may be momentous to both plaintiff and defense lawyers.
For many years, summary judgment time limitations established in the Code of Civil Procedure have been insufficient for courts to scrutinize the motions before trials. Specifically, current law establishes a deadline for submitting the reply to oppositions to summary judgment, only five calendar days before the hearing on the motion. Three-day weekends impact the time that judges have to review the motions, and judges report that they often do not receive the complete file until the day of the hearing.
AB 2049 will lengthen each deadline in the summary judgment process by six calendar days. Judges will have six additional days to review the often voluminous files relating to summary judgment, a time extension that courts have been seeking for years.
AB 2049, in coordination with the Consumer Attorneys of California, also will resolve other important summary judgment issues. The bill clarifies that each party is allowed to submit only one summary judgment motion per case, unless courts grant permission for additional motions. The bill also clarifies the general rule that replies to summary judgment opposition papers may not raise new material.
AB 2049 will improve the rules and timelines for one of the most problematical motions in civil litigation. The bill balances the interests of judges and lawyers and results from of years of discussion and debate.
This bill makes three changes to the laws governing summary judgment. First, AB 2049 amends the timeline for filing, opposing, and replying to a motion for summary judgment. Second, it prohibits parties from bringing more than one motion for summary judgment in a given case, absent good cause. Finally, it statutorily prohibits reply briefs from including any new evidentiary matter, additional material facts, or separate statement not presented in the defendant’s moving papers or the plaintiff’s opposing papers.
Amended timelines for summary judgment filings. In 2002, the Legislature drastically amended the timelines for filing notice of a summary judgment motion from 28 days to 75 days. (SB 688, Burton, Chap. 448, Stats. 2002.) CAOC advocated for that change, explaining that this measure was “intended to ensure that the responding party has adequate time to fully respond to a motion, including adequate time to conduct discovery.” They argued that the 28-day notice period that was in existing law prior to that point was “insufficient time for a party to respond to the literally hundreds of pages that are filed in support of a motion, and, most importantly, to conduct and complete discovery that is essential to proving up the plaintiff's case.” Finally, the extended notice period was meant to discourage gamesmanship by “defendants who file unwieldy motions and then resist or delay in complying with discovery requests, so that plaintiffs are hard pressed to present their response and prove their case in the 28 days permitted for filing a reply.” More than 20 years later, this measure seeks to amend the longstanding timeline for motions for summary judgment as outlined in the table below. The aim of the bill is to adjust the timeline to allow for more time for the judge to review and consider the defense’s reply brief.
Current Law | Proposed Bill | |
Notice & Opening Brief | 75 days before hearing (CCP 437c(a)) | 81 days before hearing |
Opposition | 14 days before hearing (CCP 437c(b)(2)) | 20 days before hearing |
Reply | 5 days before hearing (CCP 437c(b)(3)) | 11 days before hearing |
Trial Date | MSJ must be heard 30 days before trial date (CCP 437c(a)) 30 day time limit can be modified by the court for good cause (CCP 437c(a)) | No change |
Prohibition on filing more than one MSJ. Existing law already limits a party’s ability to renew a motion for summary judgment. (Section 437c (f)(2).) It provides: “[A] party may not move for summary judgment based on issues asserted in a prior motion for summary adjudication and denied by the court, unless that party establishes to the satisfaction of the court, newly discovered facts or circumstances or a change of law supporting the issues reasserted in the summary judgment motion.”
“Section 1008, the general statute governing motions for reconsideration, allows the trial court to reconsider and modify, amend, or revoke its prior order upon new or different facts, circumstances or law, or when the court determines that there has been a change of law that warrants reconsideration on its own motion. Like section 437c (f)(2), ‘[§] 1008 is designed to conserve the court’s resources by constraining litigants who would attempt to bring the same motion over and over.’ [Citation.]” (Schachter v. Citigroup (2005) 126 Cal. App. 4th 726, 735, citing Darling, Hall & Rae v. Kritt (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 1148, 1157.) The California Supreme Court clarified that although parties seeking a second motion for summary judgment must follow the statutory rules established above, the court may still sua sponte order a new motion for summary judgment: “Sections 437c and 1008 limit the parties’ ability to file repetitive motions but do not limit the court’s ability, on its own motion, to reconsider its prior interim orders so it may correct its own errors.” (Le Francois v. Goel (2005) 35 Cal. 4th 1094, 1107.)
Consistent with the case law, this measure would clarify that multiple motions for summary judgment brought by the same party in the same case are prohibited, absent good cause.
Prohibition on new evidence in reply. It is generally understood and “solid logic” that new evidence is not ordinarily considered on reply because “such consideration would deprive the respondent of an opportunity to counter the argument.” (Jay v. Mahaffey (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 1522, 1538; see, e.g., San Diego Watercrafts v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 308, 313 [on summary judgment, consideration of evidence omitted from separate statement violated opponent’s due process rights”] and Nazir v. United Airlines, Inc. (2009) 178 Cal.App.4th 243, 252 [additional separate statement and evidence on reply “not generally allowed”].) Nevertheless, courts have generally retained discretion to consider additional evidence. Where “supplemental” evidence submitted for the first time with a reply brief “raise[s] no new theories or arguments,” “[i]t [is] well within the court’s discretion to consider it.” (Professional Engineers in California Government v. Brown (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 861, 875.)
This measure would clarify that a reply must not include any new evidentiary matter, additional material facts, or separate statement that was not presented in the moving papers or opposing papers. This language strikes the right balance in preventing defendants from surprising plaintiffs with new evidentiary material on reply, to which plaintiffs do not have an opportunity to respond, while allowing defendants to address new evidence raised in opposition.
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: Judicial Council of California explains the need for adjusted summary judgment deadlines:
The fifth of seven goals in the Judicial Branch Strategic Plan is “Quality of Justice and Service to the Public.” AB 2049 furthers this goal because it will support judicial officers in being prepared to act on summary judgment motions in a timely and informed manner. Motions for summary judgment are some of the most time-consuming pretrial matters that civil courts handle. The current five-day timeline for a reply to an opposition brief can cause significant challenges, particularly when it is filed at the end of the week, leaving only two court days to review the reply.
Importantly, AB 2049 would adjust all of these deadlines to ensure that no party has less time to prepare or respond than what is provided under current law. Providing adequate time to support a fully informed bench is not only a benefit unto itself but it will also promote efficiencies for courts and court users by reducing the need for continuances and enhancing the ability to make effective use of the noticed hearings.
The co-sponsors of this measure, the California Defense Counsel, the Conference of California Bar Associations, and the California Judges Association, explain:
AB 2049 makes the first structural change to CCP Section 437c in 20 years. Most importantly, the bill modifies the timeline for noticing a motion for summary judgment from 75 to 81 calendar days before the hearing on the motion; the timeline for submitting an opposition to the motion from 14 calendar days to 20 calendar days before the hearing, and the timeline for submitting a reply to an opposition from 5 to 11 calendar days before the hearing. This simple change is designed to address a problem with current law, which “backloads” the deadlines to submit replies too close to summary judgment hearings, leaving judges with insufficient time to thoughtfully evaluate these important motions.
Working with the Consumer Attorneys of California, we have agreed on language to address two other important summary judgment issues. First, the bill limits the number of summary judgment motions which can be filed to one per party, per case, with an allowance for additional motions upon leave of the court based upon good cause. This is designed to prevent repetitive or unnecessary motions and merely codifies the understanding and practice of most courts and attorneys.
Second, AB 2049 clarifies that replies to summary judgment oppositions should not raise new evidence or new material facts not presented in the motion itself or in oppositions. This provision balances the interests of plaintiffs and defense by preventing replies from surprising opponents with new material never before included in motion papers, but also permitting replies to address any new material raised in oppositions.
The Consumer Attorneys of California have been working with the co-sponsors and have reached a consensus on the items currently in the bill in print. They have indicated that they are continuing to work together regarding reservations of summary judgment hearing dates:
Currently, it is increasingly difficult to obtain a hearing date for a motion for summary judgment. Often the first available hearing date is many months after the currently set trial date, causing the trial to be pushed back many months if not a year or more. We aim to find a solution by modeling the current Los Angeles court rule that states, “motion reservations in all civil matters will be cancelled if motion documents are not submitted within three (3) court days of the date when the reservation was made.” This rule was made effective February 26 with the goal of freeing up court calendars and creating a more efficient hearing reservation system. The stakeholders will continue to discuss how this model can be implemented for summary judgment motions in other courts.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
California Defense Counsel (co-sponsor)
California Judges Association (co-sponsor)
Conference of California Bar Associations (co-sponsor)
Judicial Council of California
Other
Consumer Attorneys of California
Opposition
None on file
Analysis Prepared by: Shiran Zohar / JUD. / (916) 319-2334
Discussed in Hearing
Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):