SB 1022: Enforcement of civil rights.
- Session Year: 2023-2024
- House: Senate
- Latest Version Date: 2024-08-28
Current Status:
Failed
(2024-09-29: In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.)
Introduced
In Committee
First Chamber
In Committee
Second Chamber
Enacted
Existing law, the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), establishes the Civil Rights Department under the direction of an executive officer known as the Director of Civil Rights, to enforce civil rights laws with respect to housing and employment and to protect and safeguard the right of all persons to obtain and hold employment without discrimination based upon specified characteristics or status. The FEHA makes certain discriminatory employment and housing practices unlawful, and authorizes a person claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged unlawful practice to file a verified complaint with the department. The FEHA requires the department to make an investigation in connection with a filed complaint alleging facts sufficient to constitute a violation of the FEHA, and requires the department to endeavor to eliminate the unlawful practice by conference, conciliation, and persuasion.
Existing law defines terms for purposes of these provisions, in connection with unlawful practices, as specified.
This bill would define the term group or class complaint for these provisions to include any complaint alleging a pattern or practice.
Existing law prohibits a complaint alleging a violation of specified civil rights provisions from being filed after specified timeframes following the date that the alleged unlawful practice, or refusal to cooperate with remediation of the alleged unlawful practice, occurred. Existing law allows those filing periods to be extended under specified circumstances. Existing law provides that notwithstanding other tolling or limitations period, the time for a complainant to file a civil action alleging a violation of specified civil right provisions shall be tolled during the period beginning with the filing of a complaint with the department until either the department files a civil action or one year after the department issues a written notice to a complainant that it has closed its investigation without electing to file a complaint.
This bill would make the filing deadlines for a complaint alleging a violation of those specified civil rights or alleging housing discrimination inapplicable to a complaint filed by the director or their authorized representative, or treated by the director or their authorized representative, as a group or class complaint that is alleged to have occurred within a period of 7 years or fewer before the date the complaint was filed. This bill would provide that notwithstanding any other tolling or limitations period, the time for a complainant to file a civil action under these provisions shall be tolled during the period beginning with the filing of a complaint with the department until either the department files a civil action or one year after the department issues a written notice to a complainant that it has closed its investigation without electing to file a complaint, or if the complainant timely appeals within the department the closure of their complaint, written notice to the complainant that it has remained closed following the appeal.
Existing law authorizes the director to bring a civil action in the name of the department, acting in the public interest, on behalf of an aggrieved person if conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion fails to eliminate an unlawful practice. Existing law specifies deadlines under which a civil action shall be brought, if it is to be brought, after the filing of the complaint, including deadlines for a complaint that is treated by the director as a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, as specified, and a complaint alleging specified violations. Existing law requires those deadlines to be tolled during a dispute resolution proceeding.
This bill would require those deadlines for filing a civil action to be tolled during a dispute resolution proceeding, for the amount of time specified in any written agreement between the department and a respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable time period, for the length of time for which the departments investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified, and during a timely appeal within the department of the closure of the complaint by the department.
If conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion fails to eliminate an unlawful practice, existing law requires the department to issue the person claiming to be aggrieved a right-to-sue notice if a civil action is not brought by the department, as specified. Existing law requires the department to issue a right-to-sue notice upon completion of its investigation for a complaint treated as a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, within a specified time period after filing of the complaint. Existing law requires the deadlines related to issuing a right-to-sue notice be tolled during a dispute resolution proceeding beginning on the date that the department refers the case to its dispute resolution division and ending on the date that the departments dispute resolution division closes its mediation record and returns the case to the division that referred it.
This bill would require the department to issue any right-to-sue notice, if the department determines that an aggrieved persons complaint relates to a complaint filed in the name of the director or a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, as specified, upon request by the person claiming to be aggrieved or after the directors or group or class complaint has been fully and finally disposed of and all administrative proceedings, civil actions, appeals, or related proceedings have terminated. The bill would also require the deadlines related to issuing a right-to-sue notice to be tolled for the amount of time specified in any written agreement between the department and a respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable deadline, for the length of time for which the departments investigation is extended due the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified, and during a timely appeal within the department of the closure of the complaint by the department.
Existing law authorizes an aggrieved person in relation to specified violations concerning housing discrimination to file a claim with the department. Existing law authorizes the Attorney General to file complaints in a like manner and specifies that no complaint may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated.
This bill would, instead, make the provision prohibiting a complaint from being filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated applicable to a complaint filed with the department by the aggrieved person as described above.
Existing law authorizes the department, in the case of failure to eliminate specified violations that have occurred, or that are about to occur, through conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion, or, if circumstances warrant, in advance thereof, to bring a civil action in the name of the department, acting in the public interest, on behalf of the aggrieved person as a real party in interest, as specified. Existing law authorizes the action to be filed in any county where the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, the records relevant to that practice are maintained and administered, the aggrieved party would have resided, or the defendants residence or principal office is located, as specified.
This bill would remove the provisions described above specifying the counties where the civil action may be filed.
This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 12926 of the Government Code proposed by SB 1137 and AB 1815 to be operative only if this bill and SB 1137 or AB 1815, or all three bills, are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Existing law, the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), establishes the Civil Rights Department under the direction of an executive officer known as the Director of Civil Rights, to enforce civil rights laws with respect to housing and employment and to protect and safeguard the right of all persons to obtain and hold employment without discrimination based upon specified characteristics or status. The FEHA makes certain discriminatory employment and housing practices unlawful, and authorizes a person claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged unlawful practice to file a verified complaint with the department. The FEHA requires the department to make an investigation in connection with a filed complaint alleging facts sufficient to constitute a violation of the FEHA, and requires the department to endeavor to eliminate the unlawful practice by conference, conciliation, and persuasion.
Existing law defines terms for purposes of these provisions, in connection with unlawful practices, as specified.
This bill would define the term group or class complaint for these provisions to include any complaint alleging a pattern or practice.
Existing law prohibits a complaint alleging a violation of specified civil rights provisions from being filed after specified timeframes following the date that the alleged unlawful practice, or refusal to cooperate with remediation of the alleged unlawful practice, occurred. Existing law allows those filing periods to be extended under specified circumstances. Existing law provides that notwithstanding other tolling or limitations period, the time for a complainant to file a civil action alleging a violation of specified civil right provisions shall be tolled during the period beginning with the filing of a complaint with the department until either the department files a civil action or one year after the department issues a written notice to a complainant that it has closed its investigation without electing to file a complaint.
This bill would make the filing deadlines for a complaint alleging a violation of those specified civil rights or alleging housing discrimination inapplicable to a complaint filed by the director or their authorized representative, or treated by the director or their authorized representative, as a group or class complaint that is alleged to have occurred within a period of 7 years or fewer before the date the complaint was filed. This bill would provide that notwithstanding any other tolling or limitations period, the time for a complainant to file a civil action under these provisions shall be tolled during the period beginning with the filing of a complaint with the department until either the department files a civil action or one year after the department issues a written notice to a complainant that it has closed its investigation without electing to file a complaint, or if the complainant timely appeals within the department the closure of their complaint, written notice to the complainant that it has remained closed following the appeal.
Existing law authorizes the director to bring a civil action in the name of the department, acting in the public interest, on behalf of an aggrieved person if conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion fails to eliminate an unlawful practice. Existing law specifies deadlines under which a civil action shall be brought, if it is to be brought, after the filing of the complaint, including deadlines for a complaint that is treated by the director as a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, as specified, and a complaint alleging specified violations. Existing law requires those deadlines to be tolled during a dispute resolution proceeding.
This bill would require those deadlines for filing a civil action to be tolled during a dispute resolution proceeding, for the amount of time specified in any written agreement between the department and a respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable time period, for the length of time for which the departments investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified, and during a timely appeal within the department of the closure of the complaint by the department.
If conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion fails to eliminate an unlawful practice, existing law requires the department to issue the person claiming to be aggrieved a right-to-sue notice if a civil action is not brought by the department, as specified. Existing law requires the department to issue a right-to-sue notice upon completion of its investigation for a complaint treated as a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, within a specified time period after filing of the complaint. Existing law requires the deadlines related to issuing a right-to-sue notice be tolled during a dispute resolution proceeding beginning on the date that the department refers the case to its dispute resolution division and ending on the date that the departments dispute resolution division closes its mediation record and returns the case to the division that referred it.
This bill would require the department to issue any right-to-sue notice, if the department determines that an aggrieved persons complaint relates to a complaint filed in the name of the director or a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, as specified, upon request by the person claiming to be aggrieved or after the directors or group or class complaint has been fully and finally disposed of and all administrative proceedings, civil actions, appeals, or related proceedings have terminated. The bill would also require the deadlines related to issuing a right-to-sue notice to be tolled for the amount of time specified in any written agreement between the department and a respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable deadline, for the length of time for which the departments investigation is extended due the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified, and during a timely appeal within the department of the closure of the complaint by the department.
Existing law authorizes an aggrieved person in relation to specified violations concerning housing discrimination to file a claim with the department. Existing law authorizes the Attorney General to file complaints in a like manner and specifies that no complaint may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated.
This bill would, instead, make the provision prohibiting a complaint from being filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated applicable to a complaint filed with the department by the aggrieved person as described above.
Existing law authorizes the department, in the case of failure to eliminate specified violations that have occurred, or that are about to occur, through conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion, or, if circumstances warrant, in advance thereof, to bring a civil action in the name of the department, acting in the public interest, on behalf of the aggrieved person as a real party in interest, as specified. Existing law authorizes the action to be filed in any county where the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, the records relevant to that practice are maintained and administered, the aggrieved party would have resided, or the defendants residence or principal office is located, as specified.
This bill would remove the provisions described above specifying the counties where the civil action may be filed.
This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 12926 of the Government Code proposed by SB 1137 and AB 1815 to be operative only if this bill and SB 1137 or AB 1815, or all three bills, are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Existing law, the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), establishes the Civil Rights Department under the direction of an executive officer known as the Director of Civil Rights, to enforce civil rights laws with respect to housing and employment and to protect and safeguard the right of all persons to obtain and hold employment without discrimination based upon specified characteristics or status. The FEHA makes certain discriminatory employment and housing practices unlawful, and authorizes a person claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged unlawful practice to file a verified complaint with the department. The FEHA requires the department to make an investigation in connection with a filed complaint alleging facts sufficient to constitute a violation of the FEHA, and requires the department to endeavor to eliminate the unlawful practice by conference, conciliation, and persuasion.
Existing law defines terms for purposes of these provisions, in connection with unlawful practices, as specified.
This bill would define the term group or class complaint for these provisions to include any complaint alleging a pattern or practice.
Existing law prohibits a complaint alleging a violation of specified civil rights provisions from being filed after specified timeframes following the date that the alleged unlawful practice, or refusal to cooperate with remediation of the alleged unlawful practice, occurred. Existing law allows those filing periods to be extended under specified circumstances. Existing law provides that notwithstanding other tolling or limitations period, the time for a complainant to file a civil action alleging a violation of specified civil right provisions shall be tolled during the period beginning with the filing of a complaint with the department until either the department files a civil action or one year after the department issues a written notice to a complainant that it has closed its investigation without electing to file a complaint.
This bill would make the filing deadlines for a complaint alleging a violation of those specified civil rights or alleging housing discrimination inapplicable to a complaint filed by the director or their authorized representative, or treated by the director or their authorized representative, as a group or class complaint that is alleged to have occurred within a period of 10 7 years or fewer before the date the complaint was filed, or more than 10 years before the complaint was filed if it is determined to be reasonable by a court of competent jurisdiction, as specified. filed. This bill would provide that notwithstanding any other tolling or limitations period, the time for a complainant to file a civil action under these provisions shall be tolled during the period beginning with the filing of a complaint with the department until either the department files a civil action or one year after the department issues a written notice to a complainant that it has closed its investigation without electing to file a complaint, or if the complainant timely appeals within the department the closure of their complaint, written notice to the complainant that it has remained closed following the appeal.
Existing law authorizes the director to bring a civil action in the name of the department, acting in the public interest, on behalf of an aggrieved person if conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion fails to eliminate an unlawful practice. Existing law specifies deadlines under which a civil action shall be brought, if it is to be brought, after the filing of the complaint, including deadlines for a complaint that is treated by the director as a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, as specified, and a complaint alleging specified violations. Existing law requires those deadlines to be tolled during a dispute resolution proceeding.
This bill would require those deadlines for filing a civil action to be tolled during a dispute resolution proceeding, for the amount of time specified in any written agreement between the department and a respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable time period, for the length of time for which the departments investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified, and during a timely appeal within the department of the closure of the complaint by the department.
If conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion fails to eliminate an unlawful practice, existing law requires the department to issue the person claiming to be aggrieved a right-to-sue notice if a civil action is not brought by the department, as specified. Existing law requires the department to issue a right-to-sue notice upon completion of its investigation for a complaint treated as a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, within a specified time period after filing of the complaint. Existing law requires the deadlines related to issuing a right-to-sue notice be tolled during a dispute resolution proceeding beginning on the date that the department refers the case to its dispute resolution division and ending on the date that the departments dispute resolution division closes its mediation record and returns the case to the division that referred it.
This bill would require the department to issue any right-to-sue notice, if the department determines that an aggrieved persons complaint relates to a complaint filed in the name of the director or a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, as specified, upon request by the person claiming to be aggrieved or after the directors or group or class complaint has been fully and finally disposed of and all administrative proceedings, civil actions, appeals, or related proceedings have terminated. The bill would also require the deadlines related to issuing a right-to-sue notice to be tolled for the amount of time specified in any written agreement between the department and a respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable deadline, for the length of time for which the departments investigation is extended due the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified, and during a timely appeal within the department of the closure of the complaint by the department.
Existing law authorizes an aggrieved person in relation to specified violations concerning housing discrimination to file a claim with the department. Existing law authorizes the Attorney General to file complaints in a like manner and specifies that no complaint may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated.
This bill would, instead, make the provision prohibiting a complaint from being filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated applicable to a complaint filed with the department by the aggrieved person as described above.
Existing law authorizes the department, in the case of failure to eliminate specified violations that have occurred, or that are about to occur, through conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion, or, if circumstances warrant, in advance thereof, to bring a civil action in the name of the department, acting in the public interest, on behalf of the aggrieved person as a real party in interest, as specified. Existing law authorizes the action to be filed in any county where the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, the records relevant to that practice are maintained and administered, the aggrieved party would have resided, or the defendants residence or principal office is located, as specified.
This bill would remove the provisions described above specifying the counties where the civil action may be filed.
Existing law, the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)), (FEHA), establishes the Civil Rights Department under the direction of an executive officer known as the Director of Civil Rights, to enforce civil rights laws with respect to housing and employment and to protect and safeguard the right of all persons to obtain and hold employment without discrimination based upon specified characteristics or status. The FEHA makes certain discriminatory employment and housing practices unlawful, and authorizes a person claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged unlawful practice to file a verified complaint with the department. The FEHA requires the department to make an investigation in connection with a filed complaint alleging facts sufficient to constitute a violation of the FEHA, and requires the department to endeavor to eliminate the unlawful practice by conference, conciliation, and persuasion.
Existing law defines terms for purposes of these provisions, in connection with unlawful practices, as specified.
This bill would define the term group or class complaint for these provisions to include any complaint alleging a pattern or practice.
Existing law prohibits a complaint alleging a violation of specified civil rights provisions from being filed after specified timeframes following the date that the alleged unlawful practice, or refusal to cooperate with remediation of the alleged unlawful practice, occurred. Existing law allows those filing periods to be extended under specified circumstances. Existing law provides that notwithstanding other tolling or limitations period, the time for a complainant to file a civil action alleging a violation of specified civil right provisions shall be tolled during the period beginning with the filing of a complaint with the department until either the department files a civil action or one year after the department issues a written notice to a complainant that it has closed its investigation without electing to file a complaint.
This bill would make the filing deadlines for a complaint alleging a violation of those specified civil rights or alleging housing discrimination inapplicable to a complaint filed by the director or their authorized representative, or treated by the director or their authorized representative, as a group or class complaint, complaint that is alleged to have occurred within a period of 10 years or fewer before the date the complaint was filed, or more than 10 years before the complaint was filed if it is determined to be reasonable by a court of competent jurisdiction, as specified. The bill would state that this provision is declarative of, and clarifies, existing law. This bill would provide that notwithstanding any other tolling or limitations period, the time for a complainant to file a civil action under these provisions shall be tolled during the period beginning with the filing of a complaint with the department until either the department files a civil action or one year after the department issues a written notice to a complainant that it has closed its investigation without electing to file a complaint, or if the complainant timely appeals within the department the closure of their complaint, written notice to the complainant that it has remained closed following the appeal.
Existing law authorizes the director to bring a civil action in the name of the department, acting in the public interest, on behalf of an aggrieved person if conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion fails to eliminate an unlawful practice. Existing law specifies deadlines under which a civil action shall be brought, if it is to be brought, after the filing of the complaint, including deadlines for a complaint that is treated by the director as a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, as specified, and a complaint alleging specified violations. Existing law requires those deadlines to be tolled during a dispute resolution proceeding.
This bill would require those deadlines for filing a civil action to be tolled during a dispute resolution proceeding, for the amount of time specified in any written agreement between the department and a respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable time period, for the length of time for which the departments investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified, and during a timely appeal within the department of the closure of the complaint by the department.
If conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion fails to eliminate an unlawful practice, existing law requires the department to issue the person claiming to be aggrieved a right-to-sue notice if a civil action is not brought by the department, as specified. Existing law requires the department to issue a right-to-sue notice upon completion of its investigation for a complaint treated as a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, within a specified time period after filing of the complaint. Existing law requires the deadlines related to issuing a right-to-sue notice be tolled during a dispute resolution proceeding beginning on the date that the department refers the case to its dispute resolution division and ending on the date that the departments dispute resolution division closes its mediation record and returns the case to the division that referred it.
This bill would require the department to issue any right-to-sue notice, if the department determines that an aggrieved persons complaint relates to a complaint filed in the name of the director or a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, as specified, upon request by the person claiming to be aggrieved or after the directors or group or class complaint has been fully and finally disposed of and all administrative proceedings, civil actions, appeals, or related proceedings have terminated. The bill would also require the deadlines related to issuing a right-to-sue notice to be tolled for the amount of time specified in any written agreement between the department and a respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable deadline, for the length of time for which the departments investigation is extended due the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified, and during a timely appeal within the department of the closure of the complaint by the department.
Existing law authorizes an aggrieved person in relation to specified violations concerning housing discrimination to file a claim with the department. Existing law authorizes the Attorney General to file complaints in a like manner and specifies that no complaint may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated.
This bill would, instead, make the provision prohibiting a complaint from being filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated applicable to a complaint filed with the department by the aggrieved person as described above.
Existing law authorizes the department, in the case of failure to eliminate specified violations that have occurred, or that are about to occur, through conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion, or, if circumstances warrant, in advance thereof, to bring a civil action in the name of the department, acting in the public interest, on behalf of the aggrieved person as a real party in interest, as specified. Existing law authorizes the action to be filed in any county where the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, the records relevant to that practice are maintained and administered, the aggrieved party would have resided, or the defendants residence or principal office is located, as specified.
This bill would remove the provisions described above specifying the counties where the civil action may be filed.
Existing law, the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)), establishes the Civil Rights Department under the direction of an executive officer known as the Director of Civil Rights, to enforce civil rights laws with respect to housing and employment and to protect and safeguard the right of all persons to obtain and hold employment without discrimination based upon specified characteristics or status. The FEHA makes certain discriminatory employment and housing practices unlawful, and authorizes a person claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged unlawful practice to file a verified complaint with the department. The FEHA requires the department to make an investigation in connection with a filed complaint alleging facts sufficient to constitute a violation of the FEHA, and requires the department to endeavor to eliminate the unlawful practice by conference, conciliation, and persuasion.
Existing law defines terms for purposes of these provisions, in connection with unlawful practices, as specified.
This bill would define the term group or class complaint for these provisions to include any complaint alleging a pattern or practice.
Existing law prohibits a complaint alleging a violation of specified civil rights provisions from being filed after specified timeframes following the date that the alleged unlawful practice, or refusal to cooperate with remediation of the alleged unlawful practice, occurred. Existing law allows those filing periods to be extended under specified circumstances. Existing law provides that notwithstanding other tolling or limitations period, the time for a complainant to file a civil action alleging a violation of specified civil right provisions shall be tolled during the period beginning with the filing of a complaint with the department until either the department files a civil action or one year after the department issues a written notice to a complainant that it has closed its investigation without electing to file a complaint.
This bill would make the filing deadlines for a complaint alleging a violation of those specified civil rights or alleging housing discrimination inapplicable to a complaint filed by the director or their authorized representative, or treated by the director or their authorized representative, as a group or class complaint, as specified. The bill would state that this provision is declarative of, and clarifies, existing law. This bill would provide that notwithstanding any other tolling or limitations period, the time for a complainant to file a civil action under these provisions shall be tolled during the period beginning with the filing of a complaint with the department until either the department files a civil action or one year after the department issues a written notice to a complainant that it has closed its investigation without electing to file a complaint, or if the complainant timely appeals within the department the closure of their complaint, written notice to the complainant that it has remained closed following the appeal.
Existing law authorizes the director to bring a civil action in the name of the department, acting in the public interest, on behalf of an aggrieved person if conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion fails to eliminate an unlawful practice. Existing law specifies deadlines under which a civil action shall be brought, if it is to be brought, after the filing of the complaint, including deadlines for a complaint that is treated by the director as a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, as specified, and a complaint alleging specified violations. Existing law requires those deadlines to be tolled during a dispute resolution proceeding.
This bill would require those deadlines for filing a civil action to be tolled during a dispute resolution proceeding, for the amount of time specified in any written agreement between the department and a respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable time period, for the length of time for which the departments investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified, and during a timely appeal within the department of the closure of the complaint by the department.
If conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion fails to eliminate an unlawful practice, existing law requires the department to issue the person claiming to be aggrieved a right-to-sue notice if a civil action is not brought by the department, as specified. Existing law requires the department to issue a right-to-sue notice upon completion of its investigation for a complaint treated as a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, within a specified time period after filing of the complaint. Existing law requires the deadlines related to issuing a right-to-sue notice be tolled during a dispute resolution proceeding beginning on the date that the department refers the case to its dispute resolution division and ending on the date that the departments dispute resolution division closes its mediation record and returns the case to the division that referred it.
This bill would require the department to issue any right-to-sue notice, if the department determines that an aggrieved persons complaint relates to a complaint filed in the name of the director or a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, as specified, upon request by the person claiming to be aggrieved or after the directors or group or class complaint has been fully and finally disposed of and all administrative proceedings, civil actions, appeals, or related proceedings have terminated. The bill would also require the deadlines related to issuing a right-to-sue notice to be tolled for the amount of time specified in any written agreement between the department and a respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable deadline, for the length of time for which the departments investigation is extended due the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified, and during a timely appeal within the department of the closure of the complaint by the department.
Existing law authorizes an aggrieved person in relation to specified violations concerning housing discrimination to file a claim with the department. Existing law authorizes the Attorney General to file complaints in a like manner and specifies that no complaint may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated.
This bill would, instead, make the provision prohibiting a complaint from being filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated applicable to a complaint filed with the department by the aggrieved person as described above.
Existing law authorizes the department, in the case of failure to eliminate specified violations that have occurred, or that are about to occur, through conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion, or, if circumstances warrant, in advance thereof, to bring a civil action in the name of the department, acting in the public interest, on behalf of the aggrieved person as a real party in interest, as specified. Existing law authorizes the action to be filed in any county where the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, the records relevant to that practice are maintained and administered, the aggrieved party would have resided, or the defendants residence or principal office is located, as specified.
This bill would remove the provisions described above specifying the counties where the civil action may be filed.
As used in this part in connection with unlawful practices, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context:
(a)Affirmative relief or prospective relief includes the authority to order reinstatement of an employee, awards of backpay, reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, hiring, transfers, reassignments, grants of tenure, promotions, cease and desist orders, posting of notices, training of personnel, testing, expunging of records, reporting of records, and any other similar relief that is intended to correct unlawful practices under this part.
(b)Age refers to the chronological age of any individual who has reached a 40th birthday.
(c)Except as provided by Section 12926.05, employee does not include any individual employed by that persons parent, spouse, or child or any individual employed under a special license in a nonprofit sheltered workshop or rehabilitation facility.
(d)Employer includes any person regularly employing five or more persons, or any person acting as an agent of an employer, directly or indirectly, the state or any political or civil subdivision of the state, and cities, except as follows:
Employer does not include a religious association or corporation not organized for private profit.
(e)Employment agency includes any person undertaking for compensation to procure employees or opportunities to work.
(f)Essential functions means the fundamental job duties of the employment position the individual with a disability holds or desires. Essential functions does not include the marginal functions of the position.
(1)A job function may be considered essential for any of several reasons, including, but not limited to, any one or more of the following:
(A)The function may be essential because the reason the position exists is to perform that function.
(B)The function may be essential because of the limited number of employees available among whom the performance of that job function can be distributed.
(C)The function may be highly specialized, so that the incumbent in the position is hired based on expertise or the ability to perform a particular function.
(2)Evidence of whether a particular function is essential includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)The employers judgment as to which functions are essential.
(B)Written job descriptions prepared before advertising or interviewing applicants for the job.
(C)The amount of time spent on the job performing the function.
(D)The consequences of not requiring the incumbent to perform the function.
(E)The terms of a collective bargaining agreement.
(F)The work experiences of past incumbents in the job.
(G)The current work experience of incumbents in similar jobs.
(g)(1)Genetic information means, with respect to any individual, information about any of the following:
(A)The individuals genetic tests.
(B)The genetic tests of family members of the individual.
(C)The manifestation of a disease or disorder in family members of the individual.
(2)Genetic information includes any request for, or receipt of, genetic services, or participation in clinical research that includes genetic services, by an individual or any family member of the individual.
(3)Genetic information does not include information about the sex or age of any individual.
(h)Labor organization includes any organization that exists and is constituted for the purpose, in whole or in part, of collective bargaining or of dealing with employers concerning grievances, terms or conditions of employment, or of other mutual aid or protection.
(i)Medical condition means either of the following:
(1)Any health impairment related to or associated with a diagnosis of cancer or a record or history of cancer.
(2)Genetic characteristics. For purposes of this section, genetic characteristics means either of the following:
(A)Any scientifically or medically identifiable gene or chromosome, or combination or alteration thereof, that is known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that is determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that is presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(B)Inherited characteristics that may derive from the individual or family member, that are known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that are determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that are presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(j)Mental disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any mental or psychological disorder or condition, such as intellectual disability, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness, or specific learning disabilities, that limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(A)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures, such as medications, assistive devices, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(B)A mental or psychological disorder or condition limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(C)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and shall include physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other mental or psychological disorder or condition not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a mental or psychological disorder or condition described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any mental condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a mental or psychological disorder or condition that has no present disabling effect, but that may become a mental disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
Mental disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(k)Veteran or military status means a member or veteran of the United States Armed Forces, United States Armed Forces Reserve, the United States National Guard, and the California National Guard.
(l)On the bases enumerated in this part means or refers to discrimination on the basis of one or more of the following: race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status.
(m)Physical disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss that does both of the following:
(A)Affects one or more of the following body systems: neurological, immunological, musculoskeletal, special sense organs, respiratory, including speech organs, cardiovascular, reproductive, digestive, genitourinary, hemic and lymphatic, skin, and endocrine.
(B)Limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(i)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures such as medications, assistive devices, prosthetics, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(ii)A physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(iii)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and includes physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other health impairment not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any physical condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment that has no present disabling effect but may become a physical disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
(6)Physical disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(n)Notwithstanding subdivisions (j) and (m), if the definition of disability used in the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-336) would result in broader protection of the civil rights of individuals with a mental disability or physical disability, as defined in subdivision (j) or (m), or would include any medical condition not included within those definitions, then that broader protection or coverage shall be deemed incorporated by reference into, and shall prevail over conflicting provisions of, the definitions in subdivisions (j) and (m).
(o)Race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status includes a perception that the person has any of those characteristics or that the person is associated with a person who has, or is perceived to have, any of those characteristics.
(p)Reasonable accommodation may include either of the following:
(1)Making existing facilities used by employees readily accessible to, and usable by, individuals with disabilities.
(2)Job restructuring, part-time or modified work schedules, reassignment to a vacant position, acquisition or modification of equipment or devices, adjustment or modifications of examinations, training materials or policies, the provision of qualified readers or interpreters, and other similar accommodations for individuals with disabilities.
(q)Religious creed, religion, religious observance, religious belief, and creed include all aspects of religious belief, observance, and practice, including religious dress and grooming practices. Religious dress practice shall be construed broadly to include the wearing or carrying of religious clothing, head or face coverings, jewelry, artifacts, and any other item that is part of an individual observing a religious creed. Religious grooming practice shall be construed broadly to include all forms of head, facial, and body hair that are part of an individual observing a religious creed.
(r)(1)Sex includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)Pregnancy or medical conditions related to pregnancy.
(B)Childbirth or medical conditions related to childbirth.
(C)Breastfeeding or medical conditions related to breastfeeding.
(2)Sex also includes, but is not limited to, a persons gender. Gender means sex, and includes a persons gender identity and gender expression. Gender expression means a persons gender-related appearance and behavior whether or not stereotypically associated with the persons assigned sex at birth.
(s)Sexual orientation means heterosexuality, homosexuality, and bisexuality.
(t)Supervisor means any individual having the authority, in the interest of the employer, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or the responsibility to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend that action, if, in connection with the foregoing, the exercise of that authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment.
(u)Undue hardship means an action requiring significant difficulty or expense, when considered in light of the following factors:
(1)The nature and cost of the accommodation needed.
(2)The overall financial resources of the facilities involved in the provision of the reasonable accommodations, the number of persons employed at the facility, and the effect on expenses and resources or the impact otherwise of these accommodations upon the operation of the facility.
(3)The overall financial resources of the covered entity, the overall size of the business of a covered entity with respect to the number of employees, and the number, type, and location of its facilities.
(4)The type of operations, including the composition, structure, and functions of the workforce of the entity.
(5)The geographic separateness or administrative or fiscal relationship of the facility or facilities.
(v)National origin discrimination includes, but is not limited to, discrimination on the basis of possessing a drivers license or identification card granted under Section 12801.9 of the Vehicle Code.
(w)Race is inclusive of traits historically associated with race, including, but not limited to, hair texture and protective hairstyles.
(x)Protective hairstyles includes, but is not limited to, such hairstyles as braids, locks, and twists.
(y)Reproductive health decisionmaking includes, but is not limited to, a decision to use or access a particular drug, device, product, or medical service for reproductive health. This subdivision and other provisions in this part relating to reproductive health decisionmaking shall not be construed to mean that subdivision (r) of this section and other provisions in this part related to sex do not include reproductive health decisionmaking.
(z)Group or class complaint includes any complaint alleging a pattern or practice. This subdivision is declarative of, and clarifies, existing law.
SEC. 1.1.Section 12926 of the Government Code is amended to read:12926.As used in this part in connection with unlawful practices, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context:
(a)Affirmative relief or prospective relief includes the authority to order reinstatement of an employee, awards of backpay, reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, hiring, transfers, reassignments, grants of tenure, promotions, cease and desist orders, posting of notices, training of personnel, testing, expunging of records, reporting of records, and any other similar relief that is intended to correct unlawful practices under this part.
(b)Age refers to the chronological age of any individual who has reached a 40th birthday.
(c)Except as provided by Section 12926.05, employee does not include any individual employed by that persons parent, spouse, or child or any individual employed under a special license in a nonprofit sheltered workshop or rehabilitation facility.
(d)Employer includes any person regularly employing five or more persons, or any person acting as an agent of an employer, directly or indirectly, the state or any political or civil subdivision of the state, and cities, except as follows:
Employer does not include a religious association or corporation not organized for private profit.
(e)Employment agency includes any person undertaking for compensation to procure employees or opportunities to work.
(f)Essential functions means the fundamental job duties of the employment position the individual with a disability holds or desires. Essential functions does not include the marginal functions of the position.
(1)A job function may be considered essential for any of several reasons, including, but not limited to, any one or more of the following:
(A)The function may be essential because the reason the position exists is to perform that function.
(B)The function may be essential because of the limited number of employees available among whom the performance of that job function can be distributed.
(C)The function may be highly specialized, so that the incumbent in the position is hired based on expertise or the ability to perform a particular function.
(2)Evidence of whether a particular function is essential includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)The employers judgment as to which functions are essential.
(B)Written job descriptions prepared before advertising or interviewing applicants for the job.
(C)The amount of time spent on the job performing the function.
(D)The consequences of not requiring the incumbent to perform the function.
(E)The terms of a collective bargaining agreement.
(F)The work experiences of past incumbents in the job.
(G)The current work experience of incumbents in similar jobs.
(g)(1)Genetic information means, with respect to any individual, information about any of the following:
(A)The individuals genetic tests.
(B)The genetic tests of family members of the individual.
(C)The manifestation of a disease or disorder in family members of the individual.
(2)Genetic information includes any request for, or receipt of, genetic services, or participation in clinical research that includes genetic services, by an individual or any family member of the individual.
(3)Genetic information does not include information about the sex or age of any individual.
(h)Labor organization includes any organization that exists and is constituted for the purpose, in whole or in part, of collective bargaining or of dealing with employers concerning grievances, terms or conditions of employment, or of other mutual aid or protection.
(i)Medical condition means either of the following:
(1)Any health impairment related to or associated with a diagnosis of cancer or a record or history of cancer.
(2)Genetic characteristics. For purposes of this section, genetic characteristics means either of the following:
(A)Any scientifically or medically identifiable gene or chromosome, or combination or alteration thereof, that is known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that is determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that is presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(B)Inherited characteristics that may derive from the individual or family member, that are known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that are determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that are presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(j)Mental disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any mental or psychological disorder or condition, such as intellectual disability, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness, or specific learning disabilities, that limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(A)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures, such as medications, assistive devices, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(B)A mental or psychological disorder or condition limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(C)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and shall include physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other mental or psychological disorder or condition not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a mental or psychological disorder or condition described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any mental condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a mental or psychological disorder or condition that has no present disabling effect, but that may become a mental disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
Mental disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(k)Veteran or military status means a member or veteran of the United States Armed Forces, United States Armed Forces Reserve, the United States National Guard, and the California National Guard.
(l)On the bases enumerated in this part means or refers to discrimination on the basis of one or more of the following: race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status.
(m)Physical disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss that does both of the following:
(A)Affects one or more of the following body systems: neurological, immunological, musculoskeletal, special sense organs, respiratory, including speech organs, cardiovascular, reproductive, digestive, genitourinary, hemic and lymphatic, skin, and endocrine.
(B)Limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(i)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures such as medications, assistive devices, prosthetics, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(ii)A physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(iii)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and includes physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other health impairment not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any physical condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment that has no present disabling effect but may become a physical disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
(6)Physical disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(n)Notwithstanding subdivisions (j) and (m), if the definition of disability used in the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-336) would result in broader protection of the civil rights of individuals with a mental disability or physical disability, as defined in subdivision (j) or (m), or would include any medical condition not included within those definitions, then that broader protection or coverage shall be deemed incorporated by reference into, and shall prevail over conflicting provisions of, the definitions in subdivisions (j) and (m).
(o)Race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status includes any of the following:
(1)Any combination of those characteristics.
(2)A perception that the person has any of those characteristics or any combination of those characteristics.
(3)A perception that the person is associated with a person who has, or is perceived to have, any of those characteristics or any combination of those characteristics.
(p)Reasonable accommodation may include either of the following:
(1)Making existing facilities used by employees readily accessible to, and usable by, individuals with disabilities.
(2)Job restructuring, part-time or modified work schedules, reassignment to a vacant position, acquisition or modification of equipment or devices, adjustment or modifications of examinations, training materials or policies, the provision of qualified readers or interpreters, and other similar accommodations for individuals with disabilities.
(q)Religious creed, religion, religious observance, religious belief, and creed include all aspects of religious belief, observance, and practice, including religious dress and grooming practices. Religious dress practice shall be construed broadly to include the wearing or carrying of religious clothing, head or face coverings, jewelry, artifacts, and any other item that is part of an individual observing a religious creed. Religious grooming practice shall be construed broadly to include all forms of head, facial, and body hair that are part of an individual observing a religious creed.
(r)(1)Sex includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)Pregnancy or medical conditions related to pregnancy.
(B)Childbirth or medical conditions related to childbirth.
(C)Breastfeeding or medical conditions related to breastfeeding.
(2)Sex also includes, but is not limited to, a persons gender. Gender means sex, and includes a persons gender identity and gender expression. Gender expression means a persons gender-related appearance and behavior whether or not stereotypically associated with the persons assigned sex at birth.
(s)Sexual orientation means heterosexuality, homosexuality, and bisexuality.
(t)Supervisor means any individual having the authority, in the interest of the employer, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or the responsibility to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend that action, if, in connection with the foregoing, the exercise of that authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment.
(u)Undue hardship means an action requiring significant difficulty or expense, when considered in light of the following factors:
(1)The nature and cost of the accommodation needed.
(2)The overall financial resources of the facilities involved in the provision of the reasonable accommodations, the number of persons employed at the facility, and the effect on expenses and resources or the impact otherwise of these accommodations upon the operation of the facility.
(3)The overall financial resources of the covered entity, the overall size of the business of a covered entity with respect to the number of employees, and the number, type, and location of its facilities.
(4)The type of operations, including the composition, structure, and functions of the workforce of the entity.
(5)The geographic separateness or administrative or fiscal relationship of the facility or facilities.
(v)National origin discrimination includes, but is not limited to, discrimination on the basis of possessing a drivers license or identification card granted under Section 12801.9 of the Vehicle Code.
(w)Race is inclusive of traits historically associated with race, including, but not limited to, hair texture and protective hairstyles.
(x)Protective hairstyles includes, but is not limited to, such hairstyles as braids, locks, and twists.
(y)Reproductive health decisionmaking includes, but is not limited to, a decision to use or access a particular drug, device, product, or medical service for reproductive health. This subdivision and other provisions in this part relating to reproductive health decisionmaking shall not be construed to mean that subdivision (r) of this section and other provisions in this part related to sex do not include reproductive health decisionmaking.
(z)Group or class complaint includes any complaint alleging a pattern or practice. This subdivision is declarative of, and clarifies, existing law.
SEC. 1.2.Section 12926 of the Government Code is amended to read:12926.As used in this part in connection with unlawful practices, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context:
(a)Affirmative relief or prospective relief includes the authority to order reinstatement of an employee, awards of backpay, reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, hiring, transfers, reassignments, grants of tenure, promotions, cease and desist orders, posting of notices, training of personnel, testing, expunging of records, reporting of records, and any other similar relief that is intended to correct unlawful practices under this part.
(b)Age refers to the chronological age of any individual who has reached a 40th birthday.
(c)Except as provided by Section 12926.05, employee does not include any individual employed by that persons parent, spouse, or child or any individual employed under a special license in a nonprofit sheltered workshop or rehabilitation facility.
(d)Employer includes any person regularly employing five or more persons, or any person acting as an agent of an employer, directly or indirectly, the state or any political or civil subdivision of the state, and cities, except as follows:
Employer does not include a religious association or corporation not organized for private profit.
(e)Employment agency includes any person undertaking for compensation to procure employees or opportunities to work.
(f)Essential functions means the fundamental job duties of the employment position the individual with a disability holds or desires. Essential functions does not include the marginal functions of the position.
(1)A job function may be considered essential for any of several reasons, including, but not limited to, any one or more of the following:
(A)The function may be essential because the reason the position exists is to perform that function.
(B)The function may be essential because of the limited number of employees available among whom the performance of that job function can be distributed.
(C)The function may be highly specialized, so that the incumbent in the position is hired based on expertise or the ability to perform a particular function.
(2)Evidence of whether a particular function is essential includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)The employers judgment as to which functions are essential.
(B)Written job descriptions prepared before advertising or interviewing applicants for the job.
(C)The amount of time spent on the job performing the function.
(D)The consequences of not requiring the incumbent to perform the function.
(E)The terms of a collective bargaining agreement.
(F)The work experiences of past incumbents in the job.
(G)The current work experience of incumbents in similar jobs.
(g)(1)Genetic information means, with respect to any individual, information about any of the following:
(A)The individuals genetic tests.
(B)The genetic tests of family members of the individual.
(C)The manifestation of a disease or disorder in family members of the individual.
(2)Genetic information includes any request for, or receipt of, genetic services, or participation in clinical research that includes genetic services, by an individual or any family member of the individual.
(3)Genetic information does not include information about the sex or age of any individual.
(h)Labor organization includes any organization that exists and is constituted for the purpose, in whole or in part, of collective bargaining or of dealing with employers concerning grievances, terms or conditions of employment, or of other mutual aid or protection.
(i)Medical condition means either of the following:
(1)Any health impairment related to or associated with a diagnosis of cancer or a record or history of cancer.
(2)Genetic characteristics. For purposes of this section, genetic characteristics means either of the following:
(A)Any scientifically or medically identifiable gene or chromosome, or combination or alteration thereof, that is known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that is determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that is presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(B)Inherited characteristics that may derive from the individual or family member, that are known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that are determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that are presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(j)Mental disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any mental or psychological disorder or condition, such as intellectual disability, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness, or specific learning disabilities, that limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(A)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures, such as medications, assistive devices, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(B)A mental or psychological disorder or condition limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(C)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and shall include physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other mental or psychological disorder or condition not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a mental or psychological disorder or condition described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any mental condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a mental or psychological disorder or condition that has no present disabling effect, but that may become a mental disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
Mental disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(k)Veteran or military status means a member or veteran of the United States Armed Forces, United States Armed Forces Reserve, the United States National Guard, and the California National Guard.
(l)On the bases enumerated in this part means or refers to discrimination on the basis of one or more of the following: race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status.
(m)Physical disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss that does both of the following:
(A)Affects one or more of the following body systems: neurological, immunological, musculoskeletal, special sense organs, respiratory, including speech organs, cardiovascular, reproductive, digestive, genitourinary, hemic and lymphatic, skin, and endocrine.
(B)Limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(i)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures such as medications, assistive devices, prosthetics, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(ii)A physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(iii)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and includes physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other health impairment not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any physical condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment that has no present disabling effect but may become a physical disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
(6)Physical disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(n)Notwithstanding subdivisions (j) and (m), if the definition of disability used in the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-336) would result in broader protection of the civil rights of individuals with a mental disability or physical disability, as defined in subdivision (j) or (m), or would include any medical condition not included within those definitions, then that broader protection or coverage shall be deemed incorporated by reference into, and shall prevail over conflicting provisions of, the definitions in subdivisions (j) and (m).
(o)Race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status includes a perception that the person has any of those characteristics or that the person is associated with a person who has, or is perceived to have, any of those characteristics.
(p)Reasonable accommodation may include either of the following:
(1)Making existing facilities used by employees readily accessible to, and usable by, individuals with disabilities.
(2)Job restructuring, part-time or modified work schedules, reassignment to a vacant position, acquisition or modification of equipment or devices, adjustment or modifications of examinations, training materials or policies, the provision of qualified readers or interpreters, and other similar accommodations for individuals with disabilities.
(q)Religious creed, religion, religious observance, religious belief, and creed include all aspects of religious belief, observance, and practice, including religious dress and grooming practices. Religious dress practice shall be construed broadly to include the wearing or carrying of religious clothing, head or face coverings, jewelry, artifacts, and any other item that is part of an individual observing a religious creed. Religious grooming practice shall be construed broadly to include all forms of head, facial, and body hair that are part of an individual observing a religious creed.
(r)(1)Sex includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)Pregnancy or medical conditions related to pregnancy.
(B)Childbirth or medical conditions related to childbirth.
(C)Breastfeeding or medical conditions related to breastfeeding.
(2)Sex also includes, but is not limited to, a persons gender. Gender means sex, and includes a persons gender identity and gender expression. Gender expression means a persons gender-related appearance and behavior whether or not stereotypically associated with the persons assigned sex at birth.
(s)Sexual orientation means heterosexuality, homosexuality, and bisexuality.
(t)Supervisor means any individual having the authority, in the interest of the employer, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or the responsibility to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend that action, if, in connection with the foregoing, the exercise of that authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment.
(u)Undue hardship means an action requiring significant difficulty or expense, when considered in light of the following factors:
(1)The nature and cost of the accommodation needed.
(2)The overall financial resources of the facilities involved in the provision of the reasonable accommodations, the number of persons employed at the facility, and the effect on expenses and resources or the impact otherwise of these accommodations upon the operation of the facility.
(3)The overall financial resources of the covered entity, the overall size of the business of a covered entity with respect to the number of employees, and the number, type, and location of its facilities.
(4)The type of operations, including the composition, structure, and functions of the workforce of the entity.
(5)The geographic separateness or administrative or fiscal relationship of the facility or facilities.
(v)National origin discrimination includes, but is not limited to, discrimination on the basis of possessing a drivers license or identification card granted under Section 12801.9 of the Vehicle Code.
(w)Race is inclusive of traits associated with race, including, but not limited to, hair texture and protective hairstyles.
(x)Protective hairstyles includes, but is not limited to, such hairstyles as braids, locs, and twists.
(y)Reproductive health decisionmaking includes, but is not limited to, a decision to use or access a particular drug, device, product, or medical service for reproductive health. This subdivision and other provisions in this part relating to reproductive health decisionmaking shall not be construed to mean that subdivision (r) of this section and other provisions in this part related to sex do not include reproductive health decisionmaking.
(z)(1)Group or class complaint includes any complaint alleging a pattern or practice. This paragraph is declarative of, and clarifies, existing law.
(2)Changes made to subdivisions (w) and (x) by the measure that added this paragraph do not constitute changes in, but are declaratory of, existing law.
SEC. 1.3.Section 12926 of the Government Code is amended to read:12926.As used in this part in connection with unlawful practices, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context:
(a)Affirmative relief or prospective relief includes the authority to order reinstatement of an employee, awards of backpay, reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, hiring, transfers, reassignments, grants of tenure, promotions, cease and desist orders, posting of notices, training of personnel, testing, expunging of records, reporting of records, and any other similar relief that is intended to correct unlawful practices under this part.
(b)Age refers to the chronological age of any individual who has reached a 40th birthday.
(c)Except as provided by Section 12926.05, employee does not include any individual employed by that persons parent, spouse, or child or any individual employed under a special license in a nonprofit sheltered workshop or rehabilitation facility.
(d)Employer includes any person regularly employing five or more persons, or any person acting as an agent of an employer, directly or indirectly, the state or any political or civil subdivision of the state, and cities, except as follows:
Employer does not include a religious association or corporation not organized for private profit.
(e)Employment agency includes any person undertaking for compensation to procure employees or opportunities to work.
(f)Essential functions means the fundamental job duties of the employment position the individual with a disability holds or desires. Essential functions does not include the marginal functions of the position.
(1)A job function may be considered essential for any of several reasons, including, but not limited to, any one or more of the following:
(A)The function may be essential because the reason the position exists is to perform that function.
(B)The function may be essential because of the limited number of employees available among whom the performance of that job function can be distributed.
(C)The function may be highly specialized, so that the incumbent in the position is hired based on expertise or the ability to perform a particular function.
(2)Evidence of whether a particular function is essential includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)The employers judgment as to which functions are essential.
(B)Written job descriptions prepared before advertising or interviewing applicants for the job.
(C)The amount of time spent on the job performing the function.
(D)The consequences of not requiring the incumbent to perform the function.
(E)The terms of a collective bargaining agreement.
(F)The work experiences of past incumbents in the job.
(G)The current work experience of incumbents in similar jobs.
(g)(1)Genetic information means, with respect to any individual, information about any of the following:
(A)The individuals genetic tests.
(B)The genetic tests of family members of the individual.
(C)The manifestation of a disease or disorder in family members of the individual.
(2)Genetic information includes any request for, or receipt of, genetic services, or participation in clinical research that includes genetic services, by an individual or any family member of the individual.
(3)Genetic information does not include information about the sex or age of any individual.
(h)Labor organization includes any organization that exists and is constituted for the purpose, in whole or in part, of collective bargaining or of dealing with employers concerning grievances, terms or conditions of employment, or of other mutual aid or protection.
(i)Medical condition means either of the following:
(1)Any health impairment related to or associated with a diagnosis of cancer or a record or history of cancer.
(2)Genetic characteristics. For purposes of this section, genetic characteristics means either of the following:
(A)Any scientifically or medically identifiable gene or chromosome, or combination or alteration thereof, that is known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that is determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that is presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(B)Inherited characteristics that may derive from the individual or family member, that are known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that are determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that are presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(j)Mental disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any mental or psychological disorder or condition, such as intellectual disability, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness, or specific learning disabilities, that limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(A)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures, such as medications, assistive devices, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(B)A mental or psychological disorder or condition limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(C)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and shall include physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other mental or psychological disorder or condition not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a mental or psychological disorder or condition described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any mental condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a mental or psychological disorder or condition that has no present disabling effect, but that may become a mental disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
Mental disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(k)Veteran or military status means a member or veteran of the United States Armed Forces, United States Armed Forces Reserve, the United States National Guard, and the California National Guard.
(l)On the bases enumerated in this part means or refers to discrimination on the basis of one or more of the following: race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status.
(m)Physical disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss that does both of the following:
(A)Affects one or more of the following body systems: neurological, immunological, musculoskeletal, special sense organs, respiratory, including speech organs, cardiovascular, reproductive, digestive, genitourinary, hemic and lymphatic, skin, and endocrine.
(B)Limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(i)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures such as medications, assistive devices, prosthetics, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(ii)A physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(iii)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and includes physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other health impairment not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any physical condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment that has no present disabling effect but may become a physical disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
(6)Physical disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(n)Notwithstanding subdivisions (j) and (m), if the definition of disability used in the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-336) would result in broader protection of the civil rights of individuals with a mental disability or physical disability, as defined in subdivision (j) or (m), or would include any medical condition not included within those definitions, then that broader protection or coverage shall be deemed incorporated by reference into, and shall prevail over conflicting provisions of, the definitions in subdivisions (j) and (m).
(o)Race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status includes any of the following:
(1)Any combination of those characteristics.
(2)A perception that the person has any of those characteristics or any combination of those characteristics.
(3)A perception that the person is associated with a person who has, or is perceived to have, any of those characteristics or any combination of those characteristics.
(p)Reasonable accommodation may include either of the following:
(1)Making existing facilities used by employees readily accessible to, and usable by, individuals with disabilities.
(2)Job restructuring, part-time or modified work schedules, reassignment to a vacant position, acquisition or modification of equipment or devices, adjustment or modifications of examinations, training materials or policies, the provision of qualified readers or interpreters, and other similar accommodations for individuals with disabilities.
(q)Religious creed, religion, religious observance, religious belief, and creed include all aspects of religious belief, observance, and practice, including religious dress and grooming practices. Religious dress practice shall be construed broadly to include the wearing or carrying of religious clothing, head or face coverings, jewelry, artifacts, and any other item that is part of an individual observing a religious creed. Religious grooming practice shall be construed broadly to include all forms of head, facial, and body hair that are part of an individual observing a religious creed.
(r)(1)Sex includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)Pregnancy or medical conditions related to pregnancy.
(B)Childbirth or medical conditions related to childbirth.
(C)Breastfeeding or medical conditions related to breastfeeding.
(2)Sex also includes, but is not limited to, a persons gender. Gender means sex, and includes a persons gender identity and gender expression. Gender expression means a persons gender-related appearance and behavior whether or not stereotypically associated with the persons assigned sex at birth.
(s)Sexual orientation means heterosexuality, homosexuality, and bisexuality.
(t)Supervisor means any individual having the authority, in the interest of the employer, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or the responsibility to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend that action, if, in connection with the foregoing, the exercise of that authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment.
(u)Undue hardship means an action requiring significant difficulty or expense, when considered in light of the following factors:
(1)The nature and cost of the accommodation needed.
(2)The overall financial resources of the facilities involved in the provision of the reasonable accommodations, the number of persons employed at the facility, and the effect on expenses and resources or the impact otherwise of these accommodations upon the operation of the facility.
(3)The overall financial resources of the covered entity, the overall size of the business of a covered entity with respect to the number of employees, and the number, type, and location of its facilities.
(4)The type of operations, including the composition, structure, and functions of the workforce of the entity.
(5)The geographic separateness or administrative or fiscal relationship of the facility or facilities.
(v)National origin discrimination includes, but is not limited to, discrimination on the basis of possessing a drivers license or identification card granted under Section 12801.9 of the Vehicle Code.
(w)Race is inclusive of traits associated with race, including, but not limited to, hair texture and protective hairstyles.
(x)Protective hairstyles includes, but is not limited to, such hairstyles as braids, locs, and twists.
(y)Reproductive health decisionmaking includes, but is not limited to, a decision to use or access a particular drug, device, product, or medical service for reproductive health. This subdivision and other provisions in this part relating to reproductive health decisionmaking shall not be construed to mean that subdivision (r) of this section and other provisions in this part related to sex do not include reproductive health decisionmaking.
(z)(1)Group or class complaint includes any complaint alleging a pattern or practice. This paragraph is declarative of, and clarifies, existing law.
(2)Changes made to subdivisions (w) and (x) by the measure that added this paragraph do not constitute changes in, but are declaratory of, existing law.
SEC. 2.Section 12960 of the Government Code is amended to read:12960.(a)This article governs the procedure for the prevention and elimination of practices made unlawful pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 12940) of Chapter 6.
(b)For purposes of this section, filing a complaint means filing an intake form with the department and the operative date of the verified complaint relates back to the filing of the intake form.
(c)Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged unlawful practice may file with the department a verified complaint, in writing, that shall state the name and address of the person, employer, labor organization, or employment agency alleged to have committed the unlawful practice complained of, and that shall set forth the particulars thereof and contain other information as may be required by the department. The director or the directors authorized representative may in like manner, on that persons own motion, make, sign, and file a complaint.
(d)Any employer whose employees, or some of them, refuse or threaten to refuse to cooperate with this part may file with the department a verified complaint asking for assistance by conciliation or other remedial action.
(e)(1)A complaint alleging a violation of Section 51, 51.5, 51.7, 54, 54.1, or 54.2 of the Civil Code shall not be filed pursuant to this article after the expiration of one year from the date that the alleged unlawful practice or refusal to cooperate occurred.
(2)A complaint alleging a violation of Section 52.5 of the Civil Code shall not be filed pursuant to this article after the expiration of the applicable period of time for commencing a civil action pursuant to that section.
(3)A complaint alleging a violation of Article 9.5 (commencing with Section 11135) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 shall not be filed pursuant to this article after the expiration of three years from the date that the alleged unlawful practice occurred or refusal to cooperate occurred.
(4)A complaint alleging a violation of Section 1197.5 of the Labor Code shall not be filed pursuant to this article after the expiration of the applicable period of time for commencing a civil action pursuant to that section.
(5)A complaint alleging a violation of Section 51.9 of the Civil Code or any other violation of Article 1 (commencing with Section 12940) of Chapter 6 shall not be filed after the expiration of three years from the date upon which the unlawful practice or refusal to cooperate occurred.
(6)Notwithstanding the filing deadlines contained in this subdivision or in Section 12980, a complaint filed by the director, or the directors authorized representative, or a complaint treated by the director or the directors representative, as a group or class complaint pursuant to Section 12961 may allege any violation of this part that occurred within a period of seven years or fewer before the date the complaint was filed.
(7)Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) to (6), inclusive, the filing periods set forth by this section may be extended as follows:
(A)For a period of time not to exceed 90 days following the expiration of the applicable filing deadline, if a person allegedly aggrieved by an unlawful practice first obtained knowledge of the facts of the alleged unlawful practice during the 90 days following the expiration of the applicable filing deadline.
(B)For a period of time not to exceed one year following a rebutted presumption of the identity of the persons employer under Section 12928, in order to allow a person allegedly aggrieved by an unlawful practice to make a substitute identification of the actual employer.
(C)For a period of time, not to exceed one year from the date the person aggrieved by an alleged violation of Section 51.7 of the Civil Code becomes aware of the identity of a person liable for the alleged violation, but in no case exceeding three years from the date of the alleged violation if during that period the aggrieved person is unaware of the identity of any person liable for the alleged violation.
(D)For a period of time not to exceed one year from the date that a person allegedly aggrieved by an unlawful practice attains the age of majority.
(E)For the periods of time specified in Section 52.5 of the Civil Code for complaints alleging a violation of that section.
(f)(1)Notwithstanding any tolling or limitations period under any other law, the time for a complainant to file a civil action under a statute referenced in this section shall be tolled during the period commencing with the filing of a complaint with the department for an alleged violation of that statute until either of the following:
(A)The department files a civil action for the alleged violation under this part.
(B)One year after the department issues either of the following:
(i)Written notice to a complainant that it has closed its investigation without electing to file a civil action for the alleged violation.
(ii)If the complainant timely appeals within the department the closure of their complaint, written notice to the complainant that it has remained closed following the appeal within the department.
(2)The tolling provided under this subdivision shall apply retroactively.
(3)This subdivision is not intended to revive claims that have already lapsed.
SEC. 3.Section 12965 of the Government Code is amended to read:12965.(a)(1)In the case of failure to eliminate an unlawful practice under this part through conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion, or in advance thereof if circumstances warrant, the director in the directors discretion may bring a civil action in the name of the department, acting in the public interest, on behalf of the person claiming to be aggrieved.
(2)Prior to filing a civil action, the department shall require all parties to participate in mandatory dispute resolution in the departments internal dispute resolution division free of charge to the parties in an effort to resolve the dispute without litigation.
(3)In a civil action, the person claiming to be aggrieved shall be the real party in interest and shall have the right to participate as a party and be represented by that persons own counsel.
(4)A civil action under this subdivision shall be brought in a county in which the department has an office, in a county in which unlawful practices are alleged to have been committed, in the county in which records relevant to the alleged unlawful practices are maintained and administered, in the county in which the person claiming to be aggrieved would have worked or would have had access to public accommodation, but for the alleged unlawful practices, in the county of the defendants residence or principal office, or, if the civil action includes class or group allegations on behalf of the department, in any county in the state.
(5)(A)A complaint treated by the director as a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action pursuant to Section 12961, a civil action shall be brought, if at all, within two years after the filing of the complaint.
(B)For a complaint alleging a violation of Section 51.7 of the Civil Code, a civil action shall be brought, if at all, within two years after the filing of the complaint.
(C)For a complaint other than those specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B), a civil action shall be brought, if at all, within one year after the filing of a complaint.
(D)The deadlines specified in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), shall be tolled, as follows:
(i)During a mandatory or voluntary dispute resolution proceeding commencing on the date the department refers the case to its dispute resolution division and ending on the date the departments dispute resolution division closes its mediation record and returns the case to the division that referred it.
(ii)For the amount of time specified in any written agreement between the department and a respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable deadline.
(iii)For the length of time for which the departments investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel as provided in subdivision (g) of Section 12963.5.
(iv)During a timely appeal within the department of the closure of the complaint by the department.
(b)For purposes of this section, filing a complaint means filing a verified complaint.
(c)(1)(A)Except as specified in subparagraph (B), if a civil action is not brought by the department pursuant to subdivision (a) within 150 days after the filing of a complaint, or if the department earlier determines that no civil action will be brought pursuant to subdivision (a), the department shall promptly notify, in writing, the person claiming to be aggrieved that the department shall issue, on request, the right-to-sue notice. If the person claiming to be aggrieved does not request a right-to-sue notice, the department shall issue the notice upon completion of its investigation, and not later than one year after the filing of the complaint. However, if the department determines, in its discretion, that the aggrieved persons complaint relates in whole or in part to a complaint filed in the name of the director or a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action pursuant to Section 12961, the department shall issue any right-to-sue notice upon request by the person claiming to be aggrieved or after the directors or group or class complaint has been fully and finally disposed of and all administrative proceedings, civil actions, appeals, or related proceedings have terminated.
(B)For a complaint treated as a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 12961, the department shall issue a right-to-sue notice upon completion of its investigation, and not later than two years after the filing of the complaint.
(C)The notices specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall indicate that the person claiming to be aggrieved may bring a civil action under this part against the person, employer, labor organization, or employment agency named in the verified complaint within one year from the date of that notice.
(D)This paragraph applies only to complaints alleging unlawful employment practices under Article 1 (commencing with Section 12940) of Chapter 6.
(E)The deadlines specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall be tolled, as follows:
(i)During a mandatory or voluntary dispute resolution proceeding commencing on the date the department refers the case to its dispute resolution division and ending on the date the departments dispute resolution division closes its mediation record and returns the case to the division that referred it.
(ii)For the amount of time specified in any written agreement between the department and a respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable deadline.
(iii)For the length of time for which the departments investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as provided in subdivision (g) of Section 12963.5.
(iv)During a timely appeal within the department of the closure of the complaint by the department.
(2)A city, county, or district attorney in a location having an enforcement unit established on or before March 1, 1991, pursuant to a local ordinance enacted for the purpose of prosecuting HIV/AIDS discrimination claims, acting on behalf of any person claiming to be aggrieved due to HIV/AIDS discrimination, may also bring a civil action under this part against the person, employer, labor organization, or employment agency named in the notice.
(3)The superior courts of the State of California shall have jurisdiction of actions brought pursuant to this section, and the aggrieved person may file in these courts. An action may be brought in any county in the state in which the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, in the county in which the records relevant to the practice are maintained and administered, or in the county in which the aggrieved person would have worked or would have had access to the public accommodation but for the alleged unlawful practice, but if the defendant is not found within any of these counties, an action may be brought within the county of the defendants residence or principal office.
(4)A copy of any complaint filed pursuant to this part shall be served on the principal offices of the department. The remedy for failure to send a copy of a complaint is an order to do so.
(5)A civil action brought pursuant to this section shall not be filed as class actions and shall not be maintained as class actions by the person or persons claiming to be aggrieved if those persons have filed a civil class action in the federal courts alleging a comparable claim of employment discrimination against the same defendant or defendants.
(6)In civil actions brought under this section, the court, in its discretion, may award to the prevailing party, including the department, reasonable attorneys fees and costs, including expert witness fees, except that, notwithstanding Section 998 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a prevailing defendant shall not be awarded fees and costs unless the court finds the action was frivolous, unreasonable, or groundless when brought, or the plaintiff continued to litigate after it clearly became so.
(d)A court may grant as relief in any action filed pursuant to subdivision (a) any relief a court is empowered to grant in a civil action brought pursuant to subdivision (c), in addition to any other relief that, in the judgment of the court, will effectuate the purpose of this part. This relief may include a requirement that the employer conduct training for all employees, supervisors, and management on the requirements of this part, the rights and remedies of those who allege a violation of this part, and the employers internal grievance procedures. This relief may also include any relief available under any law enforced by the department pursuant to Section 12930. In addition, in order to vindicate the purposes and policies of this part, a court may assess against the defendant, if the civil complaint or amended civil complaint so prays, a civil penalty of up to twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) to be awarded to a person denied any right provided for by Section 51.7 of the Civil Code, as an unlawful practice prohibited under this part.
(e)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (c), the one-year statute of limitations, commencing from the date of the right-to-sue notice by the department to the person claiming to be aggrieved, shall be tolled when all of the following requirements have been met:
(A)A charge of discrimination or harassment is timely filed concurrently with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the department.
(B)The investigation of the charge is deferred by the department to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
(C)A right-to-sue notice is issued to the person claiming to be aggrieved upon deferral of the charge by the department to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
(2)The time for commencing an action for which the statute of limitations is tolled under paragraph (1) expires when the federal right-to-sue period to commence a civil action expires, or one year from the date of the right-to-sue notice by the department, whichever is later.
(3)This subdivision is intended to codify the holding in Downs v. Department of Water and Power of City of Los Angeles (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1093.
(f)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (c), the one-year statute of limitations, commencing from the date of the right-to-sue notice by the department, to the person claiming to be aggrieved, shall be tolled when all of the following requirements have been met:
(A)A charge of discrimination or harassment is timely filed concurrently with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the department.
(B)The investigation of the charge is deferred by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to the Civil Rights Department.
(C)After investigation and determination by the department, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission agrees to perform a substantial weight review of the determination of the department or conducts its own investigation of the claim filed by the aggrieved person.
(2)The time for commencing an action for which the statute of limitations is tolled under paragraph (1) shall expire when the federal right-to-sue period to commence a civil action expires, or one year from the date of the right-to-sue notice by the department, whichever is later.
SEC. 4.Section 12980 of the Government Code is amended to read:12980.This article governs the procedure for the prevention and elimination of discrimination in housing made unlawful pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 12955) of Chapter 6.
(a)Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged violation of Section 12955, 12955.1, or 12955.7 may file with the department a verified complaint in writing that shall state the name and address of the person alleged to have committed the violation complained of, and that shall set forth the particulars of the alleged violation and contain any other information required by the department.
The filing of a complaint and pursuit of conciliation or remedy under this part shall not prejudice the complainants right to pursue effective judicial relief under other applicable laws, but if a civil action has been filed under Section 52 of the Civil Code, the department shall terminate proceedings upon notification of the entry of final judgment unless the judgment is a dismissal entered at the complainants request.
No complaint may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated.
(b)The Attorney General or the director may, in a like manner, make, sign, and file complaints citing practices that appear to violate the purpose of this part or any specific provisions of this part relating to housing discrimination.
(c)The department may thereupon proceed upon the complaint in the same manner and with the same powers as provided in this part in the case of an unlawful practice, except that where the provisions of this article provide greater rights and remedies to an aggrieved person than the provisions of Article 1 (commencing with Section 12960), the provisions of this article shall prevail.
(d)Upon the filing of a complaint, the department shall serve notice upon the complainant of the time limits, rights of the parties, and choice of forums provided for under the law.
(e)The department shall commence proceedings with respect to a complaint within 30 days of filing of the complaint.
(f)An investigation of allegations contained in any complaint filed with the department shall be completed within 100 days after receipt of the complaint, unless it is impracticable to do so. If the investigation is not completed within 100 days, the complainant and respondent shall be notified, in writing, of the departments reasons for not doing so.
(g)Upon the conclusion of each investigation, the department shall prepare a final investigative report containing all of the following:
(1)The names of any witnesses and the dates of any contacts with those witnesses.
(2)A summary of the dates of any correspondence or other contacts with the aggrieved persons or the respondent.
(3)A summary of witness statements.
(4)Answers to interrogatories.
(5)A summary description of other pertinent records.
A final investigative report may be amended if additional evidence is later discovered.
(h)If a civil action is not brought by the department within 100 days after the filing of a complaint, or if the department earlier determines that no civil action will be brought, the department shall promptly notify the person claiming to be aggrieved. This notice shall, in any event, be issued no more than 30 days after the date of the determination or 30 days after the date of the expiration of the 100-day period, whichever date first occurs. The notice shall indicate that the person claiming to be aggrieved may bring a civil action under this part against the person named in the verified complaint within the time period specified in Section 12989.1. The notice shall also indicate, unless the department has determined that no civil action will be brought, that the person claiming to be aggrieved has the option of continuing to seek redress for the alleged discrimination through the procedures of the department if the person does not desire to file a civil action. The superior courts of the State of California shall have jurisdiction of these actions, and the aggrieved person may file in these courts. The action may be brought in any county in the state in which the violation is alleged to have been committed, or in the county in which the records relevant to the alleged violation are maintained and administered, but if the defendant is not found within that county, the action may be brought within the county of the defendants residence or principal office. A copy of any complaint filed pursuant to this part shall be served on the principal offices of the department. The remedy for failure to send a copy of a complaint is an order to do so. In a civil action brought under this section, the court, in its discretion, may award to the prevailing party reasonable attorneys fees.
(i)All agreements reached in settlement of any housing discrimination complaint filed pursuant to this section shall be made public, unless otherwise agreed by the complainant and respondent, and the department determines that the disclosure is not required to further the purposes of the act.
(j)All agreements reached in settlement of any housing discrimination complaint filed pursuant to this section shall be agreements between the respondent and complainant, and shall be subject to approval by the department.
SEC. 5.Section 12981 of the Government Code is amended to read:12981.(a)(1)In the case of failure to eliminate a violation of Section 12955, 12955.1, or 12955.7 that has occurred, or is about to occur, through conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion, or in advance thereof if circumstances warrant, the director shall bring a civil action in the name of the department, acting in the public interest, on behalf of the aggrieved person as a real party in interest, notwithstanding Section 12971, in the same manner and with the same powers as provided in Section 12965, except that where the provisions of this article provide greater rights and remedies to an aggrieved person than Section 12965, the provisions of this article shall prevail.
(2)Prior to filing a civil action pursuant to paragraph (1), the department shall require all parties to participate in the departments mandatory dispute resolution division free of charge to the parties in an effort to resolve the dispute without litigation.
(3)A civil action brought pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be filed within 100 days after the filing of a complaint unless it is impracticable to do so. This deadline to file a civil action pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be tolled during a mandatory or voluntary dispute resolution proceeding commencing on the date the department refers the case to its dispute resolution division and ending on the date the departments dispute resolution division closes its mediation record and returns the case to the division that referred it.
(4)Any aggrieved person may intervene as a matter of right in the proceeding, and the appeal or other judicial review of that proceeding.
(b)If the department determines that an allegation concerns the legality of any zoning or other land use law or ordinance, the department or the Attorney General shall take appropriate action with respect to the complaint according to the procedures established in this part for other complaints of housing discrimination.
(c)Within one year of the effective date of every final order or decision issued pursuant to this part, the department shall conduct a compliance review to determine whether the order or decision has been fully obeyed and implemented.
(d)Whenever the department has reasonable cause to believe that a respondent has breached a conciliation agreement signed by the department, the department shall initiate a civil action to enforce the agreement.
SEC. 6.(a)Section 1.1 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 12926 of the Government Code proposed by both this bill and Senate Bill 1137. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2025, (2) each bill amends Section 12926 of the Government Code, and (3) Assembly Bill 1815 is not enacted or as enacted does not amend that section, and (4) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 1137, in which case Sections 1, 1.2, and 1.3 of this bill shall not become operative.
(b)Section 1.2 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 12926 of the Government Code proposed by both this bill and Assembly Bill 1815. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2025, (2) each bill amends Section 12926 of the Government Code, (3) Senate Bill 1137 is not enacted or as enacted does not amend that section, and (4) this bill is enacted after Assembly Bill 1815 in which case Sections 1, 1.1, and 1.3 of this bill shall not become operative.
(c)Section 1.3 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 12926 of the Government Code proposed by this bill, Senate Bill 1137, and Assembly Bill 1815. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) all three bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2025, (2) all three bills amend Section 12926 of the Government Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 1137 and Assembly Bill 1815, in which case Sections 1, 1.1, and 1.2 of this bill shall not become operative.
As used in this part in connection with unlawful practices, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context:
(a)Affirmative relief or prospective relief includes the authority to order reinstatement of an employee, awards of backpay, reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, hiring, transfers, reassignments, grants of tenure, promotions, cease and desist orders, posting of notices, training of personnel, testing, expunging of records, reporting of records, and any other similar relief that is intended to correct unlawful practices under this part.
(b)Age refers to the chronological age of any individual who has reached a 40th birthday.
(c)Except as provided by Section 12926.05, employee does not include any individual employed by that persons parent, spouse, or child or any individual employed under a special license in a nonprofit sheltered workshop or rehabilitation facility.
(d)Employer includes any person regularly employing five or more persons, or any person acting as an agent of an employer, directly or indirectly, the state or any political or civil subdivision of the state, and cities, except as follows:
Employer does not include a religious association or corporation not organized for private profit.
(e)Employment agency includes any person undertaking for compensation to procure employees or opportunities to work.
(f)Essential functions means the fundamental job duties of the employment position the individual with a disability holds or desires. Essential functions does not include the marginal functions of the position.
(1)A job function may be considered essential for any of several reasons, including, but not limited to, any one or more of the following:
(A)The function may be essential because the reason the position exists is to perform that function.
(B)The function may be essential because of the limited number of employees available among whom the performance of that job function can be distributed.
(C)The function may be highly specialized, so that the incumbent in the position is hired based on expertise or the ability to perform a particular function.
(2)Evidence of whether a particular function is essential includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)The employers judgment as to which functions are essential.
(B)Written job descriptions prepared before advertising or interviewing applicants for the job.
(C)The amount of time spent on the job performing the function.
(D)The consequences of not requiring the incumbent to perform the function.
(E)The terms of a collective bargaining agreement.
(F)The work experiences of past incumbents in the job.
(G)The current work experience of incumbents in similar jobs.
(g)(1)Genetic information means, with respect to any individual, information about any of the following:
(A)The individuals genetic tests.
(B)The genetic tests of family members of the individual.
(C)The manifestation of a disease or disorder in family members of the individual.
(2)Genetic information includes any request for, or receipt of, genetic services, or participation in clinical research that includes genetic services, by an individual or any family member of the individual.
(3)Genetic information does not include information about the sex or age of any individual.
(h)Labor organization includes any organization that exists and is constituted for the purpose, in whole or in part, of collective bargaining or of dealing with employers concerning grievances, terms or conditions of employment, or of other mutual aid or protection.
(i)Medical condition means either of the following:
(1)Any health impairment related to or associated with a diagnosis of cancer or a record or history of cancer.
(2)Genetic characteristics. For purposes of this section, genetic characteristics means either of the following:
(A)Any scientifically or medically identifiable gene or chromosome, or combination or alteration thereof, that is known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that is determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that is presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(B)Inherited characteristics that may derive from the individual or family member, that are known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that are determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that are presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(j)Mental disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any mental or psychological disorder or condition, such as intellectual disability, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness, or specific learning disabilities, that limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(A)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures, such as medications, assistive devices, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(B)A mental or psychological disorder or condition limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(C)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and shall include physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other mental or psychological disorder or condition not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a mental or psychological disorder or condition described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any mental condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a mental or psychological disorder or condition that has no present disabling effect, but that may become a mental disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
Mental disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(k)Veteran or military status means a member or veteran of the United States Armed Forces, United States Armed Forces Reserve, the United States National Guard, and the California National Guard.
(l)On the bases enumerated in this part means or refers to discrimination on the basis of one or more of the following: race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status.
(m)Physical disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss that does both of the following:
(A)Affects one or more of the following body systems: neurological, immunological, musculoskeletal, special sense organs, respiratory, including speech organs, cardiovascular, reproductive, digestive, genitourinary, hemic and lymphatic, skin, and endocrine.
(B)Limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(i)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures such as medications, assistive devices, prosthetics, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(ii)A physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(iii)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and includes physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other health impairment not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any physical condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment that has no present disabling effect but may become a physical disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
(6)Physical disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(n)Notwithstanding subdivisions (j) and (m), if the definition of disability used in the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-336) would result in broader protection of the civil rights of individuals with a mental disability or physical disability, as defined in subdivision (j) or (m), or would include any medical condition not included within those definitions, then that broader protection or coverage shall be deemed incorporated by reference into, and shall prevail over conflicting provisions of, the definitions in subdivisions (j) and (m).
(o)Race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status includes a perception that the person has any of those characteristics or that the person is associated with a person who has, or is perceived to have, any of those characteristics.
(p)Reasonable accommodation may include either of the following:
(1)Making existing facilities used by employees readily accessible to, and usable by, individuals with disabilities.
(2)Job restructuring, part-time or modified work schedules, reassignment to a vacant position, acquisition or modification of equipment or devices, adjustment or modifications of examinations, training materials or policies, the provision of qualified readers or interpreters, and other similar accommodations for individuals with disabilities.
(q)Religious creed, religion, religious observance, religious belief, and creed include all aspects of religious belief, observance, and practice, including religious dress and grooming practices. Religious dress practice shall be construed broadly to include the wearing or carrying of religious clothing, head or face coverings, jewelry, artifacts, and any other item that is part of an individual observing a religious creed. Religious grooming practice shall be construed broadly to include all forms of head, facial, and body hair that are part of an individual observing a religious creed.
(r)(1)Sex includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)Pregnancy or medical conditions related to pregnancy.
(B)Childbirth or medical conditions related to childbirth.
(C)Breastfeeding or medical conditions related to breastfeeding.
(2)Sex also includes, but is not limited to, a persons gender. Gender means sex, and includes a persons gender identity and gender expression. Gender expression means a persons gender-related appearance and behavior whether or not stereotypically associated with the persons assigned sex at birth.
(s)Sexual orientation means heterosexuality, homosexuality, and bisexuality.
(t)Supervisor means any individual having the authority, in the interest of the employer, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or the responsibility to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend that action, if, in connection with the foregoing, the exercise of that authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment.
(u)Undue hardship means an action requiring significant difficulty or expense, when considered in light of the following factors:
(1)The nature and cost of the accommodation needed.
(2)The overall financial resources of the facilities involved in the provision of the reasonable accommodations, the number of persons employed at the facility, and the effect on expenses and resources or the impact otherwise of these accommodations upon the operation of the facility.
(3)The overall financial resources of the covered entity, the overall size of the business of a covered entity with respect to the number of employees, and the number, type, and location of its facilities.
(4)The type of operations, including the composition, structure, and functions of the workforce of the entity.
(5)The geographic separateness or administrative or fiscal relationship of the facility or facilities.
(v)National origin discrimination includes, but is not limited to, discrimination on the basis of possessing a drivers license or identification card granted under Section 12801.9 of the Vehicle Code.
(w)Race is inclusive of traits historically associated with race, including, but not limited to, hair texture and protective hairstyles.
(x)Protective hairstyles includes, but is not limited to, such hairstyles as braids, locks, and twists.
(y)Reproductive health decisionmaking includes, but is not limited to, a decision to use or access a particular drug, device, product, or medical service for reproductive health. This subdivision and other provisions in this part relating to reproductive health decisionmaking shall not be construed to mean that subdivision (r) of this section and other provisions in this part related to sex do not include reproductive health decisionmaking.
(z)Group or class complaint includes any complaint alleging a pattern or practice. This subdivision is declarative of, and clarifies, existing law.
SEC. 1.1.Section 12926 of the Government Code is amended to read:12926.As used in this part in connection with unlawful practices, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context:
(a)Affirmative relief or prospective relief includes the authority to order reinstatement of an employee, awards of backpay, reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, hiring, transfers, reassignments, grants of tenure, promotions, cease and desist orders, posting of notices, training of personnel, testing, expunging of records, reporting of records, and any other similar relief that is intended to correct unlawful practices under this part.
(b)Age refers to the chronological age of any individual who has reached a 40th birthday.
(c)Except as provided by Section 12926.05, employee does not include any individual employed by that persons parent, spouse, or child or any individual employed under a special license in a nonprofit sheltered workshop or rehabilitation facility.
(d)Employer includes any person regularly employing five or more persons, or any person acting as an agent of an employer, directly or indirectly, the state or any political or civil subdivision of the state, and cities, except as follows:
Employer does not include a religious association or corporation not organized for private profit.
(e)Employment agency includes any person undertaking for compensation to procure employees or opportunities to work.
(f)Essential functions means the fundamental job duties of the employment position the individual with a disability holds or desires. Essential functions does not include the marginal functions of the position.
(1)A job function may be considered essential for any of several reasons, including, but not limited to, any one or more of the following:
(A)The function may be essential because the reason the position exists is to perform that function.
(B)The function may be essential because of the limited number of employees available among whom the performance of that job function can be distributed.
(C)The function may be highly specialized, so that the incumbent in the position is hired based on expertise or the ability to perform a particular function.
(2)Evidence of whether a particular function is essential includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)The employers judgment as to which functions are essential.
(B)Written job descriptions prepared before advertising or interviewing applicants for the job.
(C)The amount of time spent on the job performing the function.
(D)The consequences of not requiring the incumbent to perform the function.
(E)The terms of a collective bargaining agreement.
(F)The work experiences of past incumbents in the job.
(G)The current work experience of incumbents in similar jobs.
(g)(1)Genetic information means, with respect to any individual, information about any of the following:
(A)The individuals genetic tests.
(B)The genetic tests of family members of the individual.
(C)The manifestation of a disease or disorder in family members of the individual.
(2)Genetic information includes any request for, or receipt of, genetic services, or participation in clinical research that includes genetic services, by an individual or any family member of the individual.
(3)Genetic information does not include information about the sex or age of any individual.
(h)Labor organization includes any organization that exists and is constituted for the purpose, in whole or in part, of collective bargaining or of dealing with employers concerning grievances, terms or conditions of employment, or of other mutual aid or protection.
(i)Medical condition means either of the following:
(1)Any health impairment related to or associated with a diagnosis of cancer or a record or history of cancer.
(2)Genetic characteristics. For purposes of this section, genetic characteristics means either of the following:
(A)Any scientifically or medically identifiable gene or chromosome, or combination or alteration thereof, that is known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that is determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that is presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(B)Inherited characteristics that may derive from the individual or family member, that are known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that are determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that are presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(j)Mental disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any mental or psychological disorder or condition, such as intellectual disability, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness, or specific learning disabilities, that limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(A)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures, such as medications, assistive devices, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(B)A mental or psychological disorder or condition limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(C)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and shall include physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other mental or psychological disorder or condition not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a mental or psychological disorder or condition described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any mental condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a mental or psychological disorder or condition that has no present disabling effect, but that may become a mental disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
Mental disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(k)Veteran or military status means a member or veteran of the United States Armed Forces, United States Armed Forces Reserve, the United States National Guard, and the California National Guard.
(l)On the bases enumerated in this part means or refers to discrimination on the basis of one or more of the following: race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status.
(m)Physical disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss that does both of the following:
(A)Affects one or more of the following body systems: neurological, immunological, musculoskeletal, special sense organs, respiratory, including speech organs, cardiovascular, reproductive, digestive, genitourinary, hemic and lymphatic, skin, and endocrine.
(B)Limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(i)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures such as medications, assistive devices, prosthetics, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(ii)A physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(iii)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and includes physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other health impairment not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any physical condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment that has no present disabling effect but may become a physical disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
(6)Physical disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(n)Notwithstanding subdivisions (j) and (m), if the definition of disability used in the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-336) would result in broader protection of the civil rights of individuals with a mental disability or physical disability, as defined in subdivision (j) or (m), or would include any medical condition not included within those definitions, then that broader protection or coverage shall be deemed incorporated by reference into, and shall prevail over conflicting provisions of, the definitions in subdivisions (j) and (m).
(o)Race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status includes a perception that the person has any of those characteristics or that the person is associated with a person who has, or is perceived to have, any of those characteristics. any of the following:
(1)Any combination of those characteristics.
(2)A perception that the person has any of those characteristics or any combination of those characteristics.
(3)A perception that the person is associated with a person who has, or is perceived to have, any of those characteristics or any combination of those characteristics.
(p)Reasonable accommodation may include either of the following:
(1)Making existing facilities used by employees readily accessible to, and usable by, individuals with disabilities.
(2)Job restructuring, part-time or modified work schedules, reassignment to a vacant position, acquisition or modification of equipment or devices, adjustment or modifications of examinations, training materials or policies, the provision of qualified readers or interpreters, and other similar accommodations for individuals with disabilities.
(q)Religious creed, religion, religious observance, religious belief, and creed include all aspects of religious belief, observance, and practice, including religious dress and grooming practices. Religious dress practice shall be construed broadly to include the wearing or carrying of religious clothing, head or face coverings, jewelry, artifacts, and any other item that is part of an individual observing a religious creed. Religious grooming practice shall be construed broadly to include all forms of head, facial, and body hair that are part of an individual observing a religious creed.
(r)(1)Sex includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)Pregnancy or medical conditions related to pregnancy.
(B)Childbirth or medical conditions related to childbirth.
(C)Breastfeeding or medical conditions related to breastfeeding.
(2)Sex also includes, but is not limited to, a persons gender. Gender means sex, and includes a persons gender identity and gender expression. Gender expression means a persons gender-related appearance and behavior whether or not stereotypically associated with the persons assigned sex at birth.
(s)Sexual orientation means heterosexuality, homosexuality, and bisexuality.
(t)Supervisor means any individual having the authority, in the interest of the employer, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or the responsibility to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend that action, if, in connection with the foregoing, the exercise of that authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment.
(u)Undue hardship means an action requiring significant difficulty or expense, when considered in light of the following factors:
(1)The nature and cost of the accommodation needed.
(2)The overall financial resources of the facilities involved in the provision of the reasonable accommodations, the number of persons employed at the facility, and the effect on expenses and resources or the impact otherwise of these accommodations upon the operation of the facility.
(3)The overall financial resources of the covered entity, the overall size of the business of a covered entity with respect to the number of employees, and the number, type, and location of its facilities.
(4)The type of operations, including the composition, structure, and functions of the workforce of the entity.
(5)The geographic separateness or administrative or fiscal relationship of the facility or facilities.
(v)National origin discrimination includes, but is not limited to, discrimination on the basis of possessing a drivers license or identification card granted under Section 12801.9 of the Vehicle Code.
(w)Race is inclusive of traits historically associated with race, including, but not limited to, hair texture and protective hairstyles.
(x)Protective hairstyles includes, but is not limited to, such hairstyles as braids, locks, and twists.
(y)Reproductive health decisionmaking includes, but is not limited to, a decision to use or access a particular drug, device, product, or medical service for reproductive health. This subdivision and other provisions in this part relating to reproductive health decisionmaking shall not be construed to mean that subdivision (r) of this section and other provisions in this part related to sex do not include reproductive health decisionmaking.
(z)Group or class complaint includes any complaint alleging a pattern or practice. This subdivision is declarative of, and clarifies, existing law.
SEC. 1.2.Section 12926 of the Government Code is amended to read:12926.As used in this part in connection with unlawful practices, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context:
(a)Affirmative relief or prospective relief includes the authority to order reinstatement of an employee, awards of backpay, reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, hiring, transfers, reassignments, grants of tenure, promotions, cease and desist orders, posting of notices, training of personnel, testing, expunging of records, reporting of records, and any other similar relief that is intended to correct unlawful practices under this part.
(b)Age refers to the chronological age of any individual who has reached a 40th birthday.
(c)Except as provided by Section 12926.05, employee does not include any individual employed by that persons parent, spouse, or child or any individual employed under a special license in a nonprofit sheltered workshop or rehabilitation facility.
(d)Employer includes any person regularly employing five or more persons, or any person acting as an agent of an employer, directly or indirectly, the state or any political or civil subdivision of the state, and cities, except as follows:
Employer does not include a religious association or corporation not organized for private profit.
(e)Employment agency includes any person undertaking for compensation to procure employees or opportunities to work.
(f)Essential functions means the fundamental job duties of the employment position the individual with a disability holds or desires. Essential functions does not include the marginal functions of the position.
(1)A job function may be considered essential for any of several reasons, including, but not limited to, any one or more of the following:
(A)The function may be essential because the reason the position exists is to perform that function.
(B)The function may be essential because of the limited number of employees available among whom the performance of that job function can be distributed.
(C)The function may be highly specialized, so that the incumbent in the position is hired based on expertise or the ability to perform a particular function.
(2)Evidence of whether a particular function is essential includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)The employers judgment as to which functions are essential.
(B)Written job descriptions prepared before advertising or interviewing applicants for the job.
(C)The amount of time spent on the job performing the function.
(D)The consequences of not requiring the incumbent to perform the function.
(E)The terms of a collective bargaining agreement.
(F)The work experiences of past incumbents in the job.
(G)The current work experience of incumbents in similar jobs.
(g)(1)Genetic information means, with respect to any individual, information about any of the following:
(A)The individuals genetic tests.
(B)The genetic tests of family members of the individual.
(C)The manifestation of a disease or disorder in family members of the individual.
(2)Genetic information includes any request for, or receipt of, genetic services, or participation in clinical research that includes genetic services, by an individual or any family member of the individual.
(3)Genetic information does not include information about the sex or age of any individual.
(h)Labor organization includes any organization that exists and is constituted for the purpose, in whole or in part, of collective bargaining or of dealing with employers concerning grievances, terms or conditions of employment, or of other mutual aid or protection.
(i)Medical condition means either of the following:
(1)Any health impairment related to or associated with a diagnosis of cancer or a record or history of cancer.
(2)Genetic characteristics. For purposes of this section, genetic characteristics means either of the following:
(A)Any scientifically or medically identifiable gene or chromosome, or combination or alteration thereof, that is known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that is determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that is presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(B)Inherited characteristics that may derive from the individual or family member, that are known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that are determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that are presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(j)Mental disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any mental or psychological disorder or condition, such as intellectual disability, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness, or specific learning disabilities, that limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(A)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures, such as medications, assistive devices, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(B)A mental or psychological disorder or condition limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(C)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and shall include physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other mental or psychological disorder or condition not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a mental or psychological disorder or condition described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any mental condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a mental or psychological disorder or condition that has no present disabling effect, but that may become a mental disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
Mental disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(k)Veteran or military status means a member or veteran of the United States Armed Forces, United States Armed Forces Reserve, the United States National Guard, and the California National Guard.
(l)On the bases enumerated in this part means or refers to discrimination on the basis of one or more of the following: race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status.
(m)Physical disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss that does both of the following:
(A)Affects one or more of the following body systems: neurological, immunological, musculoskeletal, special sense organs, respiratory, including speech organs, cardiovascular, reproductive, digestive, genitourinary, hemic and lymphatic, skin, and endocrine.
(B)Limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(i)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures such as medications, assistive devices, prosthetics, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(ii)A physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(iii)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and includes physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other health impairment not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any physical condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment that has no present disabling effect but may become a physical disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
(6)Physical disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(n)Notwithstanding subdivisions (j) and (m), if the definition of disability used in the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-336) would result in broader protection of the civil rights of individuals with a mental disability or physical disability, as defined in subdivision (j) or (m), or would include any medical condition not included within those definitions, then that broader protection or coverage shall be deemed incorporated by reference into, and shall prevail over conflicting provisions of, the definitions in subdivisions (j) and (m).
(o)Race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status includes a perception that the person has any of those characteristics or that the person is associated with a person who has, or is perceived to have, any of those characteristics.
(p)Reasonable accommodation may include either of the following:
(1)Making existing facilities used by employees readily accessible to, and usable by, individuals with disabilities.
(2)Job restructuring, part-time or modified work schedules, reassignment to a vacant position, acquisition or modification of equipment or devices, adjustment or modifications of examinations, training materials or policies, the provision of qualified readers or interpreters, and other similar accommodations for individuals with disabilities.
(q)Religious creed, religion, religious observance, religious belief, and creed include all aspects of religious belief, observance, and practice, including religious dress and grooming practices. Religious dress practice shall be construed broadly to include the wearing or carrying of religious clothing, head or face coverings, jewelry, artifacts, and any other item that is part of an individual observing a religious creed. Religious grooming practice shall be construed broadly to include all forms of head, facial, and body hair that are part of an individual observing a religious creed.
(r)(1)Sex includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)Pregnancy or medical conditions related to pregnancy.
(B)Childbirth or medical conditions related to childbirth.
(C)Breastfeeding or medical conditions related to breastfeeding.
(2)Sex also includes, but is not limited to, a persons gender. Gender means sex, and includes a persons gender identity and gender expression. Gender expression means a persons gender-related appearance and behavior whether or not stereotypically associated with the persons assigned sex at birth.
(s)Sexual orientation means heterosexuality, homosexuality, and bisexuality.
(t)Supervisor means any individual having the authority, in the interest of the employer, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or the responsibility to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend that action, if, in connection with the foregoing, the exercise of that authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment.
(u)Undue hardship means an action requiring significant difficulty or expense, when considered in light of the following factors:
(1)The nature and cost of the accommodation needed.
(2)The overall financial resources of the facilities involved in the provision of the reasonable accommodations, the number of persons employed at the facility, and the effect on expenses and resources or the impact otherwise of these accommodations upon the operation of the facility.
(3)The overall financial resources of the covered entity, the overall size of the business of a covered entity with respect to the number of employees, and the number, type, and location of its facilities.
(4)The type of operations, including the composition, structure, and functions of the workforce of the entity.
(5)The geographic separateness or administrative or fiscal relationship of the facility or facilities.
(v)National origin discrimination includes, but is not limited to, discrimination on the basis of possessing a drivers license or identification card granted under Section 12801.9 of the Vehicle Code.
(w)Race is inclusive of traits historically associated with race, including, but not limited to, hair texture and protective hairstyles.
(x)Protective hairstyles includes, but is not limited to, such hairstyles as braids, locks, locs, and twists.
(y)Reproductive health decisionmaking includes, but is not limited to, a decision to use or access a particular drug, device, product, or medical service for reproductive health. This subdivision and other provisions in this part relating to reproductive health decisionmaking shall not be construed to mean that subdivision (r) of this section and other provisions in this part related to sex do not include reproductive health decisionmaking.
(z)(1)Group or class complaint includes any complaint alleging a pattern or practice. This paragraph is declarative of, and clarifies, existing law.
(2)Changes made to subdivisions (w) and (x) by the measure that added this paragraph do not constitute changes in, but are declaratory of, existing law.
SEC. 1.3.Section 12926 of the Government Code is amended to read:12926.As used in this part in connection with unlawful practices, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context:
(a)Affirmative relief or prospective relief includes the authority to order reinstatement of an employee, awards of backpay, reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, hiring, transfers, reassignments, grants of tenure, promotions, cease and desist orders, posting of notices, training of personnel, testing, expunging of records, reporting of records, and any other similar relief that is intended to correct unlawful practices under this part.
(b)Age refers to the chronological age of any individual who has reached a 40th birthday.
(c)Except as provided by Section 12926.05, employee does not include any individual employed by that persons parent, spouse, or child or any individual employed under a special license in a nonprofit sheltered workshop or rehabilitation facility.
(d)Employer includes any person regularly employing five or more persons, or any person acting as an agent of an employer, directly or indirectly, the state or any political or civil subdivision of the state, and cities, except as follows:
Employer does not include a religious association or corporation not organized for private profit.
(e)Employment agency includes any person undertaking for compensation to procure employees or opportunities to work.
(f)Essential functions means the fundamental job duties of the employment position the individual with a disability holds or desires. Essential functions does not include the marginal functions of the position.
(1)A job function may be considered essential for any of several reasons, including, but not limited to, any one or more of the following:
(A)The function may be essential because the reason the position exists is to perform that function.
(B)The function may be essential because of the limited number of employees available among whom the performance of that job function can be distributed.
(C)The function may be highly specialized, so that the incumbent in the position is hired based on expertise or the ability to perform a particular function.
(2)Evidence of whether a particular function is essential includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)The employers judgment as to which functions are essential.
(B)Written job descriptions prepared before advertising or interviewing applicants for the job.
(C)The amount of time spent on the job performing the function.
(D)The consequences of not requiring the incumbent to perform the function.
(E)The terms of a collective bargaining agreement.
(F)The work experiences of past incumbents in the job.
(G)The current work experience of incumbents in similar jobs.
(g)(1)Genetic information means, with respect to any individual, information about any of the following:
(A)The individuals genetic tests.
(B)The genetic tests of family members of the individual.
(C)The manifestation of a disease or disorder in family members of the individual.
(2)Genetic information includes any request for, or receipt of, genetic services, or participation in clinical research that includes genetic services, by an individual or any family member of the individual.
(3)Genetic information does not include information about the sex or age of any individual.
(h)Labor organization includes any organization that exists and is constituted for the purpose, in whole or in part, of collective bargaining or of dealing with employers concerning grievances, terms or conditions of employment, or of other mutual aid or protection.
(i)Medical condition means either of the following:
(1)Any health impairment related to or associated with a diagnosis of cancer or a record or history of cancer.
(2)Genetic characteristics. For purposes of this section, genetic characteristics means either of the following:
(A)Any scientifically or medically identifiable gene or chromosome, or combination or alteration thereof, that is known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that is determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that is presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(B)Inherited characteristics that may derive from the individual or family member, that are known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that are determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that are presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(j)Mental disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any mental or psychological disorder or condition, such as intellectual disability, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness, or specific learning disabilities, that limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(A)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures, such as medications, assistive devices, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(B)A mental or psychological disorder or condition limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(C)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and shall include physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other mental or psychological disorder or condition not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a mental or psychological disorder or condition described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any mental condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a mental or psychological disorder or condition that has no present disabling effect, but that may become a mental disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
Mental disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(k)Veteran or military status means a member or veteran of the United States Armed Forces, United States Armed Forces Reserve, the United States National Guard, and the California National Guard.
(l)On the bases enumerated in this part means or refers to discrimination on the basis of one or more of the following: race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status.
(m)Physical disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss that does both of the following:
(A)Affects one or more of the following body systems: neurological, immunological, musculoskeletal, special sense organs, respiratory, including speech organs, cardiovascular, reproductive, digestive, genitourinary, hemic and lymphatic, skin, and endocrine.
(B)Limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(i)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures such as medications, assistive devices, prosthetics, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(ii)A physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(iii)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and includes physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other health impairment not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any physical condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment that has no present disabling effect but may become a physical disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
(6)Physical disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(n)Notwithstanding subdivisions (j) and (m), if the definition of disability used in the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-336) would result in broader protection of the civil rights of individuals with a mental disability or physical disability, as defined in subdivision (j) or (m), or would include any medical condition not included within those definitions, then that broader protection or coverage shall be deemed incorporated by reference into, and shall prevail over conflicting provisions of, the definitions in subdivisions (j) and (m).
(o)Race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status includes a perception that the person has any of those characteristics or that the person is associated with a person who has, or is perceived to have, any of those characteristics. any of the following:
(1)Any combination of those characteristics.
(2)A perception that the person has any of those characteristics or any combination of those characteristics.
(3)A perception that the person is associated with a person who has, or is perceived to have, any of those characteristics or any combination of those characteristics.
(p)Reasonable accommodation may include either of the following:
(1)Making existing facilities used by employees readily accessible to, and usable by, individuals with disabilities.
(2)Job restructuring, part-time or modified work schedules, reassignment to a vacant position, acquisition or modification of equipment or devices, adjustment or modifications of examinations, training materials or policies, the provision of qualified readers or interpreters, and other similar accommodations for individuals with disabilities.
(q)Religious creed, religion, religious observance, religious belief, and creed include all aspects of religious belief, observance, and practice, including religious dress and grooming practices. Religious dress practice shall be construed broadly to include the wearing or carrying of religious clothing, head or face coverings, jewelry, artifacts, and any other item that is part of an individual observing a religious creed. Religious grooming practice shall be construed broadly to include all forms of head, facial, and body hair that are part of an individual observing a religious creed.
(r)(1)Sex includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)Pregnancy or medical conditions related to pregnancy.
(B)Childbirth or medical conditions related to childbirth.
(C)Breastfeeding or medical conditions related to breastfeeding.
(2)Sex also includes, but is not limited to, a persons gender. Gender means sex, and includes a persons gender identity and gender expression. Gender expression means a persons gender-related appearance and behavior whether or not stereotypically associated with the persons assigned sex at birth.
(s)Sexual orientation means heterosexuality, homosexuality, and bisexuality.
(t)Supervisor means any individual having the authority, in the interest of the employer, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or the responsibility to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend that action, if, in connection with the foregoing, the exercise of that authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment.
(u)Undue hardship means an action requiring significant difficulty or expense, when considered in light of the following factors:
(1)The nature and cost of the accommodation needed.
(2)The overall financial resources of the facilities involved in the provision of the reasonable accommodations, the number of persons employed at the facility, and the effect on expenses and resources or the impact otherwise of these accommodations upon the operation of the facility.
(3)The overall financial resources of the covered entity, the overall size of the business of a covered entity with respect to the number of employees, and the number, type, and location of its facilities.
(4)The type of operations, including the composition, structure, and functions of the workforce of the entity.
(5)The geographic separateness or administrative or fiscal relationship of the facility or facilities.
(v)National origin discrimination includes, but is not limited to, discrimination on the basis of possessing a drivers license or identification card granted under Section 12801.9 of the Vehicle Code.
(w)Race is inclusive of traits historically associated with race, including, but not limited to, hair texture and protective hairstyles.
(x)Protective hairstyles includes, but is not limited to, such hairstyles as braids, locks, locs, and twists.
(y)Reproductive health decisionmaking includes, but is not limited to, a decision to use or access a particular drug, device, product, or medical service for reproductive health. This subdivision and other provisions in this part relating to reproductive health decisionmaking shall not be construed to mean that subdivision (r) of this section and other provisions in this part related to sex do not include reproductive health decisionmaking.
(z)(1)Group or class complaint includes any complaint alleging a pattern or practice. This paragraph is declarative of, and clarifies, existing law.
(2)Changes made to subdivisions (w) and (x) by the measure that added this paragraph do not constitute changes in, but are declaratory of, existing law.
SEC. 2.Section 12960 of the Government Code is amended to read:12960.(a)This article governs the procedure for the prevention and elimination of practices made unlawful pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 12940) of Chapter 6.
(b)For purposes of this section, filing a complaint means filing an intake form with the department and the operative date of the verified complaint relates back to the filing of the intake form.
(c)Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged unlawful practice may file with the department a verified complaint, in writing, that shall state the name and address of the person, employer, labor organization, or employment agency alleged to have committed the unlawful practice complained of, and that shall set forth the particulars thereof and contain other information as may be required by the department. The director or the directors authorized representative may in like manner, on that persons own motion, make, sign, and file a complaint.
(d)Any employer whose employees, or some of them, refuse or threaten to refuse to cooperate with this part may file with the department a verified complaint asking for assistance by conciliation or other remedial action.
(e)(1)A complaint alleging a violation of Section 51, 51.5, 51.7, 54, 54.1, or 54.2 of the Civil Code shall not be filed pursuant to this article after the expiration of one year from the date that the alleged unlawful practice or refusal to cooperate occurred.
(2)A complaint alleging a violation of Section 52.5 of the Civil Code shall not be filed pursuant to this article after the expiration of the applicable period of time for commencing a civil action pursuant to that section.
(3)A complaint alleging a violation of Article 9.5 (commencing with Section 11135) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 shall not be filed pursuant to this article after the expiration of three years from the date that the alleged unlawful practice occurred or refusal to cooperate occurred.
(4)A complaint alleging a violation of Section 1197.5 of the Labor Code shall not be filed pursuant to this article after the expiration of the applicable period of time for commencing a civil action pursuant to that section.
(5)A complaint alleging a violation of Section 51.9 of the Civil Code or any other violation of Article 1 (commencing with Section 12940) of Chapter 6 shall not be filed after the expiration of three years from the date upon which the unlawful practice or refusal to cooperate occurred.
(6)Notwithstanding the filing deadlines contained in this subdivision or in Section 12980, a complaint filed by the director, or the directors authorized representative, or a complaint treated by the director or the directors representative, as a group or class complaint pursuant to Section 12961 may allege any violation of this part that occurred within a period of seven years or fewer before the date the complaint was filed.
(7)Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) to (6), inclusive, the filing periods set forth by this section may be extended as follows:
(A)For a period of time not to exceed 90 days following the expiration of the applicable filing deadline, if a person allegedly aggrieved by an unlawful practice first obtained knowledge of the facts of the alleged unlawful practice during the 90 days following the expiration of the applicable filing deadline.
(B)For a period of time not to exceed one year following a rebutted presumption of the identity of the persons employer under Section 12928, in order to allow a person allegedly aggrieved by an unlawful practice to make a substitute identification of the actual employer.
(C)For a period of time, not to exceed one year from the date the person aggrieved by an alleged violation of Section 51.7 of the Civil Code becomes aware of the identity of a person liable for the alleged violation, but in no case exceeding three years from the date of the alleged violation if during that period the aggrieved person is unaware of the identity of any person liable for the alleged violation.
(D)For a period of time not to exceed one year from the date that a person allegedly aggrieved by an unlawful practice attains the age of majority.
(E)For the periods of time specified in Section 52.5 of the Civil Code for complaints alleging a violation of that section.
(f)(1)Notwithstanding any tolling or limitations period under any other law, the time for a complainant to file a civil action under a statute referenced in this section shall be tolled during the period commencing with the filing of a complaint with the department for an alleged violation of that statute until either of the following:
(A)The department files a civil action for the alleged violation under this part.
(B)One year after the department issues either of the following:
(i)Written notice to a complainant that it has closed its investigation without electing to file a civil action for the alleged violation.
(ii)If the complainant timely appeals within the department the closure of their complaint, written notice to the complainant that it has remained closed following the appeal within the department.
(2)The tolling provided under this subdivision shall apply retroactively.
(3)This subdivision is not intended to revive claims that have already lapsed.
SEC. 3.Section 12965 of the Government Code is amended to read:12965.(a)(1)In the case of failure to eliminate an unlawful practice under this part through conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion, or in advance thereof if circumstances warrant, the director in the directors discretion may bring a civil action in the name of the department, acting in the public interest, on behalf of the person claiming to be aggrieved.
(2)Prior to filing a civil action, the department shall require all parties to participate in mandatory dispute resolution in the departments internal dispute resolution division free of charge to the parties in an effort to resolve the dispute without litigation.
(3)In a civil action, the person claiming to be aggrieved shall be the real party in interest and shall have the right to participate as a party and be represented by that persons own counsel.
(4)A civil action under this subdivision shall be brought in a county in which the department has an office, in a county in which unlawful practices are alleged to have been committed, in the county in which records relevant to the alleged unlawful practices are maintained and administered, in the county in which the person claiming to be aggrieved would have worked or would have had access to public accommodation, but for the alleged unlawful practices, in the county of the defendants residence or principal office, or, if the civil action includes class or group allegations on behalf of the department, in any county in the state.
(5)(A)A complaint treated by the director as a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action pursuant to Section 12961, a civil action shall be brought, if at all, within two years after the filing of the complaint.
(B)For a complaint alleging a violation of Section 51.7 of the Civil Code, a civil action shall be brought, if at all, within two years after the filing of the complaint.
(C)For a complaint other than those specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B), a civil action shall be brought, if at all, within one year after the filing of a complaint.
(D)The deadlines specified in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), shall be tolled, as follows:
(i)During a mandatory or voluntary dispute resolution proceeding commencing on the date the department refers the case to its dispute resolution division and ending on the date the departments dispute resolution division closes its mediation record and returns the case to the division that referred it.
(ii)For the amount of time specified in any written agreement between the department and a respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable deadline.
(iii)For the length of time for which the departments investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel as provided in subdivision (g) of Section 12963.5.
(iv)During a timely appeal within the department of the closure of the complaint by the department.
(b)For purposes of this section, filing a complaint means filing a verified complaint.
(c)(1)(A)Except as specified in subparagraph (B), if a civil action is not brought by the department pursuant to subdivision (a) within 150 days after the filing of a complaint, or if the department earlier determines that no civil action will be brought pursuant to subdivision (a), the department shall promptly notify, in writing, the person claiming to be aggrieved that the department shall issue, on request, the right-to-sue notice. If the person claiming to be aggrieved does not request a right-to-sue notice, the department shall issue the notice upon completion of its investigation, and not later than one year after the filing of the complaint. However, if the department determines, in its discretion, that the aggrieved persons complaint relates in whole or in part to a complaint filed in the name of the director or a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action pursuant to Section 12961, the department shall issue any right-to-sue notice upon request by the person claiming to be aggrieved or after the directors or group or class complaint has been fully and finally disposed of and all administrative proceedings, civil actions, appeals, or related proceedings have terminated.
(B)For a complaint treated as a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 12961, the department shall issue a right-to-sue notice upon completion of its investigation, and not later than two years after the filing of the complaint.
(C)The notices specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall indicate that the person claiming to be aggrieved may bring a civil action under this part against the person, employer, labor organization, or employment agency named in the verified complaint within one year from the date of that notice.
(D)This paragraph applies only to complaints alleging unlawful employment practices under Article 1 (commencing with Section 12940) of Chapter 6.
(E)The deadlines specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall be tolled, as follows:
(i)During a mandatory or voluntary dispute resolution proceeding commencing on the date the department refers the case to its dispute resolution division and ending on the date the departments dispute resolution division closes its mediation record and returns the case to the division that referred it.
(ii)For the amount of time specified in any written agreement between the department and a respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable deadline.
(iii)For the length of time for which the departments investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as provided in subdivision (g) of Section 12963.5.
(iv)During a timely appeal within the department of the closure of the complaint by the department.
(2)A city, county, or district attorney in a location having an enforcement unit established on or before March 1, 1991, pursuant to a local ordinance enacted for the purpose of prosecuting HIV/AIDS discrimination claims, acting on behalf of any person claiming to be aggrieved due to HIV/AIDS discrimination, may also bring a civil action under this part against the person, employer, labor organization, or employment agency named in the notice.
(3)The superior courts of the State of California shall have jurisdiction of actions brought pursuant to this section, and the aggrieved person may file in these courts. An action may be brought in any county in the state in which the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, in the county in which the records relevant to the practice are maintained and administered, or in the county in which the aggrieved person would have worked or would have had access to the public accommodation but for the alleged unlawful practice, but if the defendant is not found within any of these counties, an action may be brought within the county of the defendants residence or principal office.
(4)A copy of any complaint filed pursuant to this part shall be served on the principal offices of the department. The remedy for failure to send a copy of a complaint is an order to do so.
(5)A civil action brought pursuant to this section shall not be filed as class actions and shall not be maintained as class actions by the person or persons claiming to be aggrieved if those persons have filed a civil class action in the federal courts alleging a comparable claim of employment discrimination against the same defendant or defendants.
(6)In civil actions brought under this section, the court, in its discretion, may award to the prevailing party, including the department, reasonable attorneys fees and costs, including expert witness fees, except that, notwithstanding Section 998 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a prevailing defendant shall not be awarded fees and costs unless the court finds the action was frivolous, unreasonable, or groundless when brought, or the plaintiff continued to litigate after it clearly became so.
(d)A court may grant as relief in any action filed pursuant to subdivision (a) any relief a court is empowered to grant in a civil action brought pursuant to subdivision (c), in addition to any other relief that, in the judgment of the court, will effectuate the purpose of this part. This relief may include a requirement that the employer conduct training for all employees, supervisors, and management on the requirements of this part, the rights and remedies of those who allege a violation of this part, and the employers internal grievance procedures. This relief may also include any relief available under any law enforced by the department pursuant to Section 12930. In addition, in order to vindicate the purposes and policies of this part, a court may assess against the defendant, if the civil complaint or amended civil complaint so prays, a civil penalty of up to twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) to be awarded to a person denied any right provided for by Section 51.7 of the Civil Code, as an unlawful practice prohibited under this part.
(e)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (c), the one-year statute of limitations, commencing from the date of the right-to-sue notice by the department to the person claiming to be aggrieved, shall be tolled when all of the following requirements have been met:
(A)A charge of discrimination or harassment is timely filed concurrently with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the department.
(B)The investigation of the charge is deferred by the department to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
(C)A right-to-sue notice is issued to the person claiming to be aggrieved upon deferral of the charge by the department to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
(2)The time for commencing an action for which the statute of limitations is tolled under paragraph (1) expires when the federal right-to-sue period to commence a civil action expires, or one year from the date of the right-to-sue notice by the department, whichever is later.
(3)This subdivision is intended to codify the holding in Downs v. Department of Water and Power of City of Los Angeles (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1093.
(f)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (c), the one-year statute of limitations, commencing from the date of the right-to-sue notice by the department, to the person claiming to be aggrieved, shall be tolled when all of the following requirements have been met:
(A)A charge of discrimination or harassment is timely filed concurrently with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the department.
(B)The investigation of the charge is deferred by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to the Civil Rights Department.
(C)After investigation and determination by the department, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission agrees to perform a substantial weight review of the determination of the department or conducts its own investigation of the claim filed by the aggrieved person.
(2)The time for commencing an action for which the statute of limitations is tolled under paragraph (1) shall expire when the federal right-to-sue period to commence a civil action expires, or one year from the date of the right-to-sue notice by the department, whichever is later.
SEC. 4.Section 12980 of the Government Code is amended to read:12980.This article governs the procedure for the prevention and elimination of discrimination in housing made unlawful pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 12955) of Chapter 6.
(a)Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged violation of Section 12955, 12955.1, or 12955.7 may file with the department a verified complaint in writing that shall state the name and address of the person alleged to have committed the violation complained of, and that shall set forth the particulars of the alleged violation and contain any other information required by the department.
The filing of a complaint and pursuit of conciliation or remedy under this part shall not prejudice the complainants right to pursue effective judicial relief under other applicable laws, but if a civil action has been filed under Section 52 of the Civil Code, the department shall terminate proceedings upon notification of the entry of final judgment unless the judgment is a dismissal entered at the complainants request.
No complaint may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated.
(b)The Attorney General or the director may, in a like manner, make, sign, and file complaints citing practices that appear to violate the purpose of this part or any specific provisions of this part relating to housing discrimination.
(c)The department may thereupon proceed upon the complaint in the same manner and with the same powers as provided in this part in the case of an unlawful practice, except that where the provisions of this article provide greater rights and remedies to an aggrieved person than the provisions of Article 1 (commencing with Section 12960), the provisions of this article shall prevail.
(d)Upon the filing of a complaint, the department shall serve notice upon the complainant of the time limits, rights of the parties, and choice of forums provided for under the law.
(e)The department shall commence proceedings with respect to a complaint within 30 days of filing of the complaint.
(f)An investigation of allegations contained in any complaint filed with the department shall be completed within 100 days after receipt of the complaint, unless it is impracticable to do so. If the investigation is not completed within 100 days, the complainant and respondent shall be notified, in writing, of the departments reasons for not doing so.
(g)Upon the conclusion of each investigation, the department shall prepare a final investigative report containing all of the following:
(1)The names of any witnesses and the dates of any contacts with those witnesses.
(2)A summary of the dates of any correspondence or other contacts with the aggrieved persons or the respondent.
(3)A summary of witness statements.
(4)Answers to interrogatories.
(5)A summary description of other pertinent records.
A final investigative report may be amended if additional evidence is later discovered.
(h)If a civil action is not brought by the department within 100 days after the filing of a complaint, or if the department earlier determines that no civil action will be brought, the department shall promptly notify the person claiming to be aggrieved. This notice shall, in any event, be issued no more than 30 days after the date of the determination or 30 days after the date of the expiration of the 100-day period, whichever date first occurs. The notice shall indicate that the person claiming to be aggrieved may bring a civil action under this part against the person named in the verified complaint within the time period specified in Section 12989.1. The notice shall also indicate, unless the department has determined that no civil action will be brought, that the person claiming to be aggrieved has the option of continuing to seek redress for the alleged discrimination through the procedures of the department if the person does not desire to file a civil action. The superior courts of the State of California shall have jurisdiction of these actions, and the aggrieved person may file in these courts. The action may be brought in any county in the state in which the violation is alleged to have been committed, or in the county in which the records relevant to the alleged violation are maintained and administered, but if the defendant is not found within that county, the action may be brought within the county of the defendants residence or principal office. A copy of any complaint filed pursuant to this part shall be served on the principal offices of the department. The remedy for failure to send a copy of a complaint is an order to do so. In a civil action brought under this section, the court, in its discretion, may award to the prevailing party reasonable attorneys fees.
(i)All agreements reached in settlement of any housing discrimination complaint filed pursuant to this section shall be made public, unless otherwise agreed by the complainant and respondent, and the department determines that the disclosure is not required to further the purposes of the act.
(j)All agreements reached in settlement of any housing discrimination complaint filed pursuant to this section shall be agreements between the respondent and complainant, and shall be subject to approval by the department.
SEC. 5.Section 12981 of the Government Code is amended to read:12981.(a)(1)In the case of failure to eliminate a violation of Section 12955, 12955.1, or 12955.7 that has occurred, or is about to occur, through conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion, or in advance thereof if circumstances warrant, the director shall bring a civil action in the name of the department, acting in the public interest, on behalf of the aggrieved person as a real party in interest, notwithstanding Section 12971, in the same manner and with the same powers as provided in Section 12965, except that where the provisions of this article provide greater rights and remedies to an aggrieved person than Section 12965, the provisions of this article shall prevail.
(2)Prior to filing a civil action pursuant to paragraph (1), the department shall require all parties to participate in the departments mandatory dispute resolution division free of charge to the parties in an effort to resolve the dispute without litigation.
(3)A civil action brought pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be filed within 100 days after the filing of a complaint unless it is impracticable to do so. This deadline to file a civil action pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be tolled during a mandatory or voluntary dispute resolution proceeding commencing on the date the department refers the case to its dispute resolution division and ending on the date the departments dispute resolution division closes its mediation record and returns the case to the division that referred it.
(4)Any aggrieved person may intervene as a matter of right in the proceeding, and the appeal or other judicial review of that proceeding.
(b)If the department determines that an allegation concerns the legality of any zoning or other land use law or ordinance, the department or the Attorney General shall take appropriate action with respect to the complaint according to the procedures established in this part for other complaints of housing discrimination.
(c)Within one year of the effective date of every final order or decision issued pursuant to this part, the department shall conduct a compliance review to determine whether the order or decision has been fully obeyed and implemented.
(d)Whenever the department has reasonable cause to believe that a respondent has breached a conciliation agreement signed by the department, the department shall initiate a civil action to enforce the agreement.
SEC. 6.(a)Section 1.1 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 12926 of the Government Code proposed by both this bill and Senate Bill 1137. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2025, (2) each bill amends Section 12926 of the Government Code, and (3) Assembly Bill 1815 is not enacted or as enacted does not amend that section, and (4) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 1137, in which case Sections 1, 1.2, and 1.3 of this bill shall not become operative.
(b)Section 1.2 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 12926 of the Government Code proposed by both this bill and Assembly Bill 1815. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2025, (2) each bill amends Section 12926 of the Government Code, (3) Senate Bill 1137 is not enacted or as enacted does not amend that section, and (4) this bill is enacted after Assembly Bill 1815 in which case Sections 1, 1.1, and 1.3 of this bill shall not become operative.
(c)Section 1.3 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 12926 of the Government Code proposed by this bill, Senate Bill 1137, and Assembly Bill 1815. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) all three bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2025, (2) all three bills amend Section 12926 of the Government Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 1137 and Assembly Bill 1815, in which case Sections 1, 1.1, and 1.2 of this bill shall not become operative.
As used in this part in connection with unlawful practices, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context:
(a)Affirmative relief or prospective relief includes the authority to order reinstatement of an employee, awards of backpay, reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, hiring, transfers, reassignments, grants of tenure, promotions, cease and desist orders, posting of notices, training of personnel, testing, expunging of records, reporting of records, and any other similar relief that is intended to correct unlawful practices under this part.
(b)Age refers to the chronological age of any individual who has reached a 40th birthday.
(c)Except as provided by Section 12926.05, employee does not include any individual employed by that persons parent, spouse, or child or any individual employed under a special license in a nonprofit sheltered workshop or rehabilitation facility.
(d)Employer includes any person regularly employing five or more persons, or any person acting as an agent of an employer, directly or indirectly, the state or any political or civil subdivision of the state, and cities, except as follows:
Employer does not include a religious association or corporation not organized for private profit.
(e)Employment agency includes any person undertaking for compensation to procure employees or opportunities to work.
(f)Essential functions means the fundamental job duties of the employment position the individual with a disability holds or desires. Essential functions does not include the marginal functions of the position.
(1)A job function may be considered essential for any of several reasons, including, but not limited to, any one or more of the following:
(A)The function may be essential because the reason the position exists is to perform that function.
(B)The function may be essential because of the limited number of employees available among whom the performance of that job function can be distributed.
(C)The function may be highly specialized, so that the incumbent in the position is hired based on expertise or the ability to perform a particular function.
(2)Evidence of whether a particular function is essential includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)The employers judgment as to which functions are essential.
(B)Written job descriptions prepared before advertising or interviewing applicants for the job.
(C)The amount of time spent on the job performing the function.
(D)The consequences of not requiring the incumbent to perform the function.
(E)The terms of a collective bargaining agreement.
(F)The work experiences of past incumbents in the job.
(G)The current work experience of incumbents in similar jobs.
(g)(1)Genetic information means, with respect to any individual, information about any of the following:
(A)The individuals genetic tests.
(B)The genetic tests of family members of the individual.
(C)The manifestation of a disease or disorder in family members of the individual.
(2)Genetic information includes any request for, or receipt of, genetic services, or participation in clinical research that includes genetic services, by an individual or any family member of the individual.
(3)Genetic information does not include information about the sex or age of any individual.
(h)Labor organization includes any organization that exists and is constituted for the purpose, in whole or in part, of collective bargaining or of dealing with employers concerning grievances, terms or conditions of employment, or of other mutual aid or protection.
(i)Medical condition means either of the following:
(1)Any health impairment related to or associated with a diagnosis of cancer or a record or history of cancer.
(2)Genetic characteristics. For purposes of this section, genetic characteristics means either of the following:
(A)Any scientifically or medically identifiable gene or chromosome, or combination or alteration thereof, that is known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that is determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that is presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(B)Inherited characteristics that may derive from the individual or family member, that are known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that are determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that are presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(j)Mental disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any mental or psychological disorder or condition, such as intellectual disability, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness, or specific learning disabilities, that limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(A)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures, such as medications, assistive devices, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(B)A mental or psychological disorder or condition limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(C)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and shall include physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other mental or psychological disorder or condition not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a mental or psychological disorder or condition described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any mental condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a mental or psychological disorder or condition that has no present disabling effect, but that may become a mental disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
Mental disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(k)Veteran or military status means a member or veteran of the United States Armed Forces, United States Armed Forces Reserve, the United States National Guard, and the California National Guard.
(l)On the bases enumerated in this part means or refers to discrimination on the basis of one or more of the following: race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status.
(m)Physical disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss that does both of the following:
(A)Affects one or more of the following body systems: neurological, immunological, musculoskeletal, special sense organs, respiratory, including speech organs, cardiovascular, reproductive, digestive, genitourinary, hemic and lymphatic, skin, and endocrine.
(B)Limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(i)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures such as medications, assistive devices, prosthetics, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(ii)A physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(iii)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and includes physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other health impairment not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any physical condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment that has no present disabling effect but may become a physical disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
(6)Physical disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(n)Notwithstanding subdivisions (j) and (m), if the definition of disability used in the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-336) would result in broader protection of the civil rights of individuals with a mental disability or physical disability, as defined in subdivision (j) or (m), or would include any medical condition not included within those definitions, then that broader protection or coverage shall be deemed incorporated by reference into, and shall prevail over conflicting provisions of, the definitions in subdivisions (j) and (m).
(o)Race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status includes a perception that the person has any of those characteristics or that the person is associated with a person who has, or is perceived to have, any of those characteristics.
(p)Reasonable accommodation may include either of the following:
(1)Making existing facilities used by employees readily accessible to, and usable by, individuals with disabilities.
(2)Job restructuring, part-time or modified work schedules, reassignment to a vacant position, acquisition or modification of equipment or devices, adjustment or modifications of examinations, training materials or policies, the provision of qualified readers or interpreters, and other similar accommodations for individuals with disabilities.
(q)Religious creed, religion, religious observance, religious belief, and creed include all aspects of religious belief, observance, and practice, including religious dress and grooming practices. Religious dress practice shall be construed broadly to include the wearing or carrying of religious clothing, head or face coverings, jewelry, artifacts, and any other item that is part of an individual observing a religious creed. Religious grooming practice shall be construed broadly to include all forms of head, facial, and body hair that are part of an individual observing a religious creed.
(r)(1)Sex includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)Pregnancy or medical conditions related to pregnancy.
(B)Childbirth or medical conditions related to childbirth.
(C)Breastfeeding or medical conditions related to breastfeeding.
(2)Sex also includes, but is not limited to, a persons gender. Gender means sex, and includes a persons gender identity and gender expression. Gender expression means a persons gender-related appearance and behavior whether or not stereotypically associated with the persons assigned sex at birth.
(s)Sexual orientation means heterosexuality, homosexuality, and bisexuality.
(t)Supervisor means any individual having the authority, in the interest of the employer, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or the responsibility to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend that action, if, in connection with the foregoing, the exercise of that authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment.
(u)Undue hardship means an action requiring significant difficulty or expense, when considered in light of the following factors:
(1)The nature and cost of the accommodation needed.
(2)The overall financial resources of the facilities involved in the provision of the reasonable accommodations, the number of persons employed at the facility, and the effect on expenses and resources or the impact otherwise of these accommodations upon the operation of the facility.
(3)The overall financial resources of the covered entity, the overall size of the business of a covered entity with respect to the number of employees, and the number, type, and location of its facilities.
(4)The type of operations, including the composition, structure, and functions of the workforce of the entity.
(5)The geographic separateness or administrative or fiscal relationship of the facility or facilities.
(v)National origin discrimination includes, but is not limited to, discrimination on the basis of possessing a drivers license or identification card granted under Section 12801.9 of the Vehicle Code.
(w)Race is inclusive of traits historically associated with race, including, but not limited to, hair texture and protective hairstyles.
(x)Protective hairstyles includes, but is not limited to, such hairstyles as braids, locks, and twists.
(y)Reproductive health decisionmaking includes, but is not limited to, a decision to use or access a particular drug, device, product, or medical service for reproductive health. This subdivision and other provisions in this part relating to reproductive health decisionmaking shall not be construed to mean that subdivision (r) of this section and other provisions in this part related to sex do not include reproductive health decisionmaking.
(z)Group or class complaint includes any complaint alleging a pattern or practice. This subdivision is declarative of, and clarifies, existing law.
SEC. 2.Section 12960 of the Government Code is amended to read:12960.(a)This article governs the procedure for the prevention and elimination of practices made unlawful pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 12940) of Chapter 6.
(b)For purposes of this section, filing a complaint means filing an intake form with the department and the operative date of the verified complaint relates back to the filing of the intake form.
(c)Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged unlawful practice may file with the department a verified complaint, in writing, that shall state the name and address of the person, employer, labor organization, or employment agency alleged to have committed the unlawful practice complained of, and that shall set forth the particulars thereof and contain other information as may be required by the department. The director or the directors authorized representative may in like manner, on that persons own motion, make, sign, and file a complaint.
(d)Any employer whose employees, or some of them, refuse or threaten to refuse to cooperate with this part may file with the department a verified complaint asking for assistance by conciliation or other remedial action.
(e)(1)A complaint alleging a violation of Section 51, 51.5, 51.7, 54, 54.1, or 54.2 of the Civil Code shall not be filed pursuant to this article after the expiration of one year from the date that the alleged unlawful practice or refusal to cooperate occurred.
(2)A complaint alleging a violation of Section 52.5 of the Civil Code shall not be filed pursuant to this article after the expiration of the applicable period of time for commencing a civil action pursuant to that section.
(3)A complaint alleging a violation of Article 9.5 (commencing with Section 11135) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 shall not be filed pursuant to this article after the expiration of three years from the date that the alleged unlawful practice occurred or refusal to cooperate occurred.
(4)A complaint alleging a violation of Section 1197.5 of the Labor Code shall not be filed pursuant to this article after the expiration of the applicable period of time for commencing a civil action pursuant to that section.
(5)A complaint alleging a violation of Section 51.9 of the Civil Code or any other violation of Article 1 (commencing with Section 12940) of Chapter 6 shall not be filed after the expiration of three years from the date upon which the unlawful practice or refusal to cooperate occurred.
(6)Notwithstanding the filing deadlines contained in this subdivision or in Section 12980, a complaint filed by the director, or the directors authorized representative, or a complaint treated by the director or the directors representative, as a group or class complaint pursuant to Section 12961 may allege any violation of this part that occurred within a period of 10 seven years or fewer before the date the complaint was filed, or more than 10 years before the complaint was filed if it is determined to be reasonable by a court of competent jurisdiction. filed.
(7)Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) to (6), inclusive, the filing periods set forth by this section may be extended as follows:
(A)For a period of time not to exceed 90 days following the expiration of the applicable filing deadline, if a person allegedly aggrieved by an unlawful practice first obtained knowledge of the facts of the alleged unlawful practice during the 90 days following the expiration of the applicable filing deadline.
(B)For a period of time not to exceed one year following a rebutted presumption of the identity of the persons employer under Section 12928, in order to allow a person allegedly aggrieved by an unlawful practice to make a substitute identification of the actual employer.
(C)For a period of time, not to exceed one year from the date the person aggrieved by an alleged violation of Section 51.7 of the Civil Code becomes aware of the identity of a person liable for the alleged violation, but in no case exceeding three years from the date of the alleged violation if during that period the aggrieved person is unaware of the identity of any person liable for the alleged violation.
(D)For a period of time not to exceed one year from the date that a person allegedly aggrieved by an unlawful practice attains the age of majority.
(E)For the periods of time specified in Section 52.5 of the Civil Code for complaints alleging a violation of that section.
(f)(1)Notwithstanding any tolling or limitations period under any other law, the time for a complainant to file a civil action under a statute referenced in this section shall be tolled during the period commencing with the filing of a complaint with the department for an alleged violation of that statute until either of the following:
(A)The department files a civil action for the alleged violation under this part.
(B)One year after the department issues either of the following:
(i)Written notice to a complainant that it has closed its investigation without electing to file a civil action for the alleged violation.
(ii)If the complainant timely appeals within the department the closure of their complaint, written notice to the complainant that it has remained closed following the appeal within the department.
(2)The tolling provided under this subdivision shall apply retroactively.
(3)This subdivision is not intended to revive claims that have already lapsed.
SEC. 3.Section 12965 of the Government Code is amended to read:12965.(a)(1)In the case of failure to eliminate an unlawful practice under this part through conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion, or in advance thereof if circumstances warrant, the director in the directors discretion may bring a civil action in the name of the department, acting in the public interest, on behalf of the person claiming to be aggrieved.
(2)Prior to filing a civil action, the department shall require all parties to participate in mandatory dispute resolution in the departments internal dispute resolution division free of charge to the parties in an effort to resolve the dispute without litigation.
(3)In a civil action, the person claiming to be aggrieved shall be the real party in interest and shall have the right to participate as a party and be represented by that persons own counsel.
(4)A civil action under this subdivision shall be brought in a county in which the department has an office, in a county in which unlawful practices are alleged to have been committed, in the county in which records relevant to the alleged unlawful practices are maintained and administered, in the county in which the person claiming to be aggrieved would have worked or would have had access to public accommodation, but for the alleged unlawful practices, in the county of the defendants residence or principal office, or, if the civil action includes class or group allegations on behalf of the department, in any county in the state.
(5)(A)A complaint treated by the director as a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action pursuant to Section 12961, a civil action shall be brought, if at all, within two years after the filing of the complaint.
(B)For a complaint alleging a violation of Section 51.7 of the Civil Code, a civil action shall be brought, if at all, within two years after the filing of the complaint.
(C)For a complaint other than those specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B), a civil action shall be brought, if at all, within one year after the filing of a complaint.
(D)The deadlines specified in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), shall be tolled, as follows:
(i)During a mandatory or voluntary dispute resolution proceeding commencing on the date the department refers the case to its dispute resolution division and ending on the date the departments dispute resolution division closes its mediation record and returns the case to the division that referred it.
(ii)For the amount of time specified in any written agreement between the department and a respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable deadline.
(iii)For the length of time for which the departments investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel as provided in subdivision (g) of Section 12963.5.
(iv)During a timely appeal within the department of the closure of the complaint by the department.
(b)For purposes of this section, filing a complaint means filing a verified complaint.
(c)(1)(A)Except as specified in subparagraph (B), if a civil action is not brought by the department pursuant to subdivision (a) within 150 days after the filing of a complaint, or if the department earlier determines that no civil action will be brought pursuant to subdivision (a), the department shall promptly notify, in writing, the person claiming to be aggrieved that the department shall issue, on request, the right-to-sue notice. If the person claiming to be aggrieved does not request a right-to-sue notice, the department shall issue the notice upon completion of its investigation, and not later than one year after the filing of the complaint. However, if the department determines, in its discretion, that the aggrieved persons complaint relates in whole or in part to a complaint filed in the name of the director or a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action pursuant to Section 12961, the department shall issue any right-to-sue notice upon request by the person claiming to be aggrieved or after the directors or group or class complaint has been fully and finally disposed of and all administrative proceedings, civil actions, appeals, or related proceedings have terminated.
(B)For a complaint treated as a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 12961, the department shall issue a right-to-sue notice upon completion of its investigation, and not later than two years after the filing of the complaint.
(C)The notices specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall indicate that the person claiming to be aggrieved may bring a civil action under this part against the person, employer, labor organization, or employment agency named in the verified complaint within one year from the date of that notice.
(D)This paragraph applies only to complaints alleging unlawful employment practices under Article 1 (commencing with Section 12940) of Chapter 6.
(E)The deadlines specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall be tolled, as follows:
(i)During a mandatory or voluntary dispute resolution proceeding commencing on the date the department refers the case to its dispute resolution division and ending on the date the departments dispute resolution division closes its mediation record and returns the case to the division that referred it.
(ii)For the amount of time specified in any written agreement between the department and a respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable deadline.
(iii)For the length of time for which the departments investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as provided in subdivision (g) of Section 12963.5.
(iv)During a timely appeal within the department of the closure of the complaint by the department.
(2)A city, county, or district attorney in a location having an enforcement unit established on or before March 1, 1991, pursuant to a local ordinance enacted for the purpose of prosecuting HIV/AIDS discrimination claims, acting on behalf of any person claiming to be aggrieved due to HIV/AIDS discrimination, may also bring a civil action under this part against the person, employer, labor organization, or employment agency named in the notice.
(3)The superior courts of the State of California shall have jurisdiction of actions brought pursuant to this section, and the aggrieved person may file in these courts. An action may be brought in any county in the state in which the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, in the county in which the records relevant to the practice are maintained and administered, or in the county in which the aggrieved person would have worked or would have had access to the public accommodation but for the alleged unlawful practice, but if the defendant is not found within any of these counties, an action may be brought within the county of the defendants residence or principal office.
(4)A copy of any complaint filed pursuant to this part shall be served on the principal offices of the department. The remedy for failure to send a copy of a complaint is an order to do so.
(5)A civil action brought pursuant to this section shall not be filed as class actions and shall not be maintained as class actions by the person or persons claiming to be aggrieved if those persons have filed a civil class action in the federal courts alleging a comparable claim of employment discrimination against the same defendant or defendants.
(6)In civil actions brought under this section, the court, in its discretion, may award to the prevailing party, including the department, reasonable attorneys fees and costs, including expert witness fees, except that, notwithstanding Section 998 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a prevailing defendant shall not be awarded fees and costs unless the court finds the action was frivolous, unreasonable, or groundless when brought, or the plaintiff continued to litigate after it clearly became so.
(d)A court may grant as relief in any action filed pursuant to subdivision (a) any relief a court is empowered to grant in a civil action brought pursuant to subdivision (c), in addition to any other relief that, in the judgment of the court, will effectuate the purpose of this part. This relief may include a requirement that the employer conduct training for all employees, supervisors, and management on the requirements of this part, the rights and remedies of those who allege a violation of this part, and the employers internal grievance procedures. This relief may also include any relief available under any law enforced by the department pursuant to Section 12930. In addition, in order to vindicate the purposes and policies of this part, a court may assess against the defendant, if the civil complaint or amended civil complaint so prays, a civil penalty of up to twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) to be awarded to a person denied any right provided for by Section 51.7 of the Civil Code, as an unlawful practice prohibited under this part.
(e)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (c), the one-year statute of limitations, commencing from the date of the right-to-sue notice by the department to the person claiming to be aggrieved, shall be tolled when all of the following requirements have been met:
(A)A charge of discrimination or harassment is timely filed concurrently with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the department.
(B)The investigation of the charge is deferred by the department to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
(C)A right-to-sue notice is issued to the person claiming to be aggrieved upon deferral of the charge by the department to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
(2)The time for commencing an action for which the statute of limitations is tolled under paragraph (1) expires when the federal right-to-sue period to commence a civil action expires, or one year from the date of the right-to-sue notice by the department, whichever is later.
(3)This subdivision is intended to codify the holding in Downs v. Department of Water and Power of City of Los Angeles (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1093.
(f)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (c), the one-year statute of limitations, commencing from the date of the right-to-sue notice by the department, to the person claiming to be aggrieved, shall be tolled when all of the following requirements have been met:
(A)A charge of discrimination or harassment is timely filed concurrently with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the department.
(B)The investigation of the charge is deferred by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to the Civil Rights Department.
(C)After investigation and determination by the department, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission agrees to perform a substantial weight review of the determination of the department or conducts its own investigation of the claim filed by the aggrieved person.
(2)The time for commencing an action for which the statute of limitations is tolled under paragraph (1) shall expire when the federal right-to-sue period to commence a civil action expires, or one year from the date of the right-to-sue notice by the department, whichever is later.
SEC. 4.Section 12980 of the Government Code is amended to read:12980.This article governs the procedure for the prevention and elimination of discrimination in housing made unlawful pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 12955) of Chapter 6.
(a)Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged violation of Section 12955, 12955.1, or 12955.7 may file with the department a verified complaint in writing that shall state the name and address of the person alleged to have committed the violation complained of, and that shall set forth the particulars of the alleged violation and contain any other information required by the department.
The filing of a complaint and pursuit of conciliation or remedy under this part shall not prejudice the complainants right to pursue effective judicial relief under other applicable laws, but if a civil action has been filed under Section 52 of the Civil Code, the department shall terminate proceedings upon notification of the entry of final judgment unless the judgment is a dismissal entered at the complainants request.
No complaint may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated.
(b)The Attorney General or the director may, in a like manner, make, sign, and file complaints citing practices that appear to violate the purpose of this part or any specific provisions of this part relating to housing discrimination.
(c)The department may thereupon proceed upon the complaint in the same manner and with the same powers as provided in this part in the case of an unlawful practice, except that where the provisions of this article provide greater rights and remedies to an aggrieved person than the provisions of Article 1 (commencing with Section 12960), the provisions of this article shall prevail.
(d)Upon the filing of a complaint, the department shall serve notice upon the complainant of the time limits, rights of the parties, and choice of forums provided for under the law.
(e)The department shall commence proceedings with respect to a complaint within 30 days of filing of the complaint.
(f)An investigation of allegations contained in any complaint filed with the department shall be completed within 100 days after receipt of the complaint, unless it is impracticable to do so. If the investigation is not completed within 100 days, the complainant and respondent shall be notified, in writing, of the departments reasons for not doing so.
(g)Upon the conclusion of each investigation, the department shall prepare a final investigative report containing all of the following:
(1)The names of any witnesses and the dates of any contacts with those witnesses.
(2)A summary of the dates of any correspondence or other contacts with the aggrieved persons or the respondent.
(3)A summary of witness statements.
(4)Answers to interrogatories.
(5)A summary description of other pertinent records.
A final investigative report may be amended if additional evidence is later discovered.
(h)If a civil action is not brought by the department within 100 days after the filing of a complaint, or if the department earlier determines that no civil action will be brought, the department shall promptly notify the person claiming to be aggrieved. This notice shall, in any event, be issued no more than 30 days after the date of the determination or 30 days after the date of the expiration of the 100-day period, whichever date first occurs. The notice shall indicate that the person claiming to be aggrieved may bring a civil action under this part against the person named in the verified complaint within the time period specified in Section 12989.1. The notice shall also indicate, unless the department has determined that no civil action will be brought, that the person claiming to be aggrieved has the option of continuing to seek redress for the alleged discrimination through the procedures of the department if the person does not desire to file a civil action. The superior courts of the State of California shall have jurisdiction of these actions, and the aggrieved person may file in these courts. The action may be brought in any county in the state in which the violation is alleged to have been committed, or in the county in which the records relevant to the alleged violation are maintained and administered, but if the defendant is not found within that county, the action may be brought within the county of the defendants residence or principal office. A copy of any complaint filed pursuant to this part shall be served on the principal offices of the department. The remedy for failure to send a copy of a complaint is an order to do so. In a civil action brought under this section, the court, in its discretion, may award to the prevailing party reasonable attorneys fees.
(i)All agreements reached in settlement of any housing discrimination complaint filed pursuant to this section shall be made public, unless otherwise agreed by the complainant and respondent, and the department determines that the disclosure is not required to further the purposes of the act.
(j)All agreements reached in settlement of any housing discrimination complaint filed pursuant to this section shall be agreements between the respondent and complainant, and shall be subject to approval by the department.
SEC. 5.Section 12981 of the Government Code is amended to read:12981.(a)(1)In the case of failure to eliminate a violation of Section 12955, 12955.1, or 12955.7 that has occurred, or is about to occur, through conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion, or in advance thereof if circumstances warrant, the director shall bring a civil action in the name of the department, acting in the public interest, on behalf of the aggrieved person as a real party in interest, notwithstanding Section 12971, in the same manner and with the same powers as provided in Section 12965, except that where the provisions of this article provide greater rights and remedies to an aggrieved person than Section 12965, the provisions of this article shall prevail.
(2)Prior to filing a civil action pursuant to paragraph (1), the department shall require all parties to participate in the departments mandatory dispute resolution division free of charge to the parties in an effort to resolve the dispute without litigation.
(3)A civil action brought pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be filed within 100 days after the filing of a complaint unless it is impracticable to do so. This deadline to file a civil action pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be tolled during a mandatory or voluntary dispute resolution proceeding commencing on the date the department refers the case to its dispute resolution division and ending on the date the departments dispute resolution division closes its mediation record and returns the case to the division that referred it.
(4)Any aggrieved person may intervene as a matter of right in the proceeding, and the appeal or other judicial review of that proceeding.
(b)If the department determines that an allegation concerns the legality of any zoning or other land use law or ordinance, the department or the Attorney General shall take appropriate action with respect to the complaint according to the procedures established in this part for other complaints of housing discrimination.
(c)Within one year of the effective date of every final order or decision issued pursuant to this part, the department shall conduct a compliance review to determine whether the order or decision has been fully obeyed and implemented.
(d)Whenever the department has reasonable cause to believe that a respondent has breached a conciliation agreement signed by the department, the department shall initiate a civil action to enforce the agreement.
As used in this part in connection with unlawful practices, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context:
(a)Affirmative relief or prospective relief includes the authority to order reinstatement of an employee, awards of backpay, reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, hiring, transfers, reassignments, grants of tenure, promotions, cease and desist orders, posting of notices, training of personnel, testing, expunging of records, reporting of records, and any other similar relief that is intended to correct unlawful practices under this part.
(b)Age refers to the chronological age of any individual who has reached a 40th birthday.
(c)Except as provided by Section 12926.05, employee does not include any individual employed by that persons parent, spouse, or child or any individual employed under a special license in a nonprofit sheltered workshop or rehabilitation facility.
(d)Employer includes any person regularly employing five or more persons, or any person acting as an agent of an employer, directly or indirectly, the state or any political or civil subdivision of the state, and cities, except as follows:
Employer does not include a religious association or corporation not organized for private profit.
(e)Employment agency includes any person undertaking for compensation to procure employees or opportunities to work.
(f)Essential functions means the fundamental job duties of the employment position the individual with a disability holds or desires. Essential functions does not include the marginal functions of the position.
(1)A job function may be considered essential for any of several reasons, including, but not limited to, any one or more of the following:
(A)The function may be essential because the reason the position exists is to perform that function.
(B)The function may be essential because of the limited number of employees available among whom the performance of that job function can be distributed.
(C)The function may be highly specialized, so that the incumbent in the position is hired based on expertise or the ability to perform a particular function.
(2)Evidence of whether a particular function is essential includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)The employers judgment as to which functions are essential.
(B)Written job descriptions prepared before advertising or interviewing applicants for the job.
(C)The amount of time spent on the job performing the function.
(D)The consequences of not requiring the incumbent to perform the function.
(E)The terms of a collective bargaining agreement.
(F)The work experiences of past incumbents in the job.
(G)The current work experience of incumbents in similar jobs.
(g)(1)Genetic information means, with respect to any individual, information about any of the following:
(A)The individuals genetic tests.
(B)The genetic tests of family members of the individual.
(C)The manifestation of a disease or disorder in family members of the individual.
(2)Genetic information includes any request for, or receipt of, genetic services, or participation in clinical research that includes genetic services, by an individual or any family member of the individual.
(3)Genetic information does not include information about the sex or age of any individual.
(h)Labor organization includes any organization that exists and is constituted for the purpose, in whole or in part, of collective bargaining or of dealing with employers concerning grievances, terms or conditions of employment, or of other mutual aid or protection.
(i)Medical condition means either of the following:
(1)Any health impairment related to or associated with a diagnosis of cancer or a record or history of cancer.
(2)Genetic characteristics. For purposes of this section, genetic characteristics means either of the following:
(A)Any scientifically or medically identifiable gene or chromosome, or combination or alteration thereof, that is known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that is determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that is presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(B)Inherited characteristics that may derive from the individual or family member, that are known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that are determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that are presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(j)Mental disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any mental or psychological disorder or condition, such as intellectual disability, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness, or specific learning disabilities, that limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(A)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures, such as medications, assistive devices, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(B)A mental or psychological disorder or condition limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(C)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and shall include physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other mental or psychological disorder or condition not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a mental or psychological disorder or condition described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any mental condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a mental or psychological disorder or condition that has no present disabling effect, but that may become a mental disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
Mental disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(k)Veteran or military status means a member or veteran of the United States Armed Forces, United States Armed Forces Reserve, the United States National Guard, and the California National Guard.
(l)On the bases enumerated in this part means or refers to discrimination on the basis of one or more of the following: race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status.
(m)Physical disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss that does both of the following:
(A)Affects one or more of the following body systems: neurological, immunological, musculoskeletal, special sense organs, respiratory, including speech organs, cardiovascular, reproductive, digestive, genitourinary, hemic and lymphatic, skin, and endocrine.
(B)Limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(i)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures such as medications, assistive devices, prosthetics, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(ii)A physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(iii)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and includes physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other health impairment not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any physical condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment that has no present disabling effect but may become a physical disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
(6)Physical disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(n)Notwithstanding subdivisions (j) and (m), if the definition of disability used in the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-336) would result in broader protection of the civil rights of individuals with a mental disability or physical disability, as defined in subdivision (j) or (m), or would include any medical condition not included within those definitions, then that broader protection or coverage shall be deemed incorporated by reference into, and shall prevail over conflicting provisions of, the definitions in subdivisions (j) and (m).
(o)Race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status includes a perception that the person has any of those characteristics or that the person is associated with a person who has, or is perceived to have, any of those characteristics.
(p)Reasonable accommodation may include either of the following:
(1)Making existing facilities used by employees readily accessible to, and usable by, individuals with disabilities.
(2)Job restructuring, part-time or modified work schedules, reassignment to a vacant position, acquisition or modification of equipment or devices, adjustment or modifications of examinations, training materials or policies, the provision of qualified readers or interpreters, and other similar accommodations for individuals with disabilities.
(q)Religious creed, religion, religious observance, religious belief, and creed include all aspects of religious belief, observance, and practice, including religious dress and grooming practices. Religious dress practice shall be construed broadly to include the wearing or carrying of religious clothing, head or face coverings, jewelry, artifacts, and any other item that is part of an individual observing a religious creed. Religious grooming practice shall be construed broadly to include all forms of head, facial, and body hair that are part of an individual observing a religious creed.
(r)(1)Sex includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)Pregnancy or medical conditions related to pregnancy.
(B)Childbirth or medical conditions related to childbirth.
(C)Breastfeeding or medical conditions related to breastfeeding.
(2)Sex also includes, but is not limited to, a persons gender. Gender means sex, and includes a persons gender identity and gender expression. Gender expression means a persons gender-related appearance and behavior whether or not stereotypically associated with the persons assigned sex at birth.
(s)Sexual orientation means heterosexuality, homosexuality, and bisexuality.
(t)Supervisor means any individual having the authority, in the interest of the employer, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or the responsibility to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend that action, if, in connection with the foregoing, the exercise of that authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment.
(u)Undue hardship means an action requiring significant difficulty or expense, when considered in light of the following factors:
(1)The nature and cost of the accommodation needed.
(2)The overall financial resources of the facilities involved in the provision of the reasonable accommodations, the number of persons employed at the facility, and the effect on expenses and resources or the impact otherwise of these accommodations upon the operation of the facility.
(3)The overall financial resources of the covered entity, the overall size of the business of a covered entity with respect to the number of employees, and the number, type, and location of its facilities.
(4)The type of operations, including the composition, structure, and functions of the workforce of the entity.
(5)The geographic separateness or administrative or fiscal relationship of the facility or facilities.
(v)National origin discrimination includes, but is not limited to, discrimination on the basis of possessing a drivers license or identification card granted under Section 12801.9 of the Vehicle Code.
(w)Race is inclusive of traits historically associated with race, including, but not limited to, hair texture and protective hairstyles.
(x)Protective hairstyles includes, but is not limited to, such hairstyles as braids, locks, and twists.
(y)Reproductive health decisionmaking includes, but is not limited to, a decision to use or access a particular drug, device, product, or medical service for reproductive health. This subdivision and other provisions in this part relating to reproductive health decisionmaking shall not be construed to mean that subdivision (r) of this section and other provisions in this part related to sex do not include reproductive health decisionmaking.
(z)Group or class complaint includes any complaint alleging a pattern or practice. This subdivision is declarative of, and clarifies, existing law.
SEC. 2.Section 12960 of the Government Code is amended to read:12960.(a)This article governs the procedure for the prevention and elimination of practices made unlawful pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 12940) of Chapter 6.
(b)For purposes of this section, filing a complaint means filing an intake form with the department and the operative date of the verified complaint relates back to the filing of the intake form.
(c)Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged unlawful practice may file with the department a verified complaint, in writing, that shall state the name and address of the person, employer, labor organization, or employment agency alleged to have committed the unlawful practice complained of, and that shall set forth the particulars thereof and contain other information as may be required by the department. The director or the directors authorized representative may in like manner, on that persons own motion, make, sign, and file a complaint.
(d)Any employer whose employees, or some of them, refuse or threaten to refuse to cooperate with this part may file with the department a verified complaint asking for assistance by conciliation or other remedial action.
(e)(1)A complaint alleging a violation of Section 51, 51.5, 51.7, 54, 54.1, or 54.2 of the Civil Code shall not be filed pursuant to this article after the expiration of one year from the date that the alleged unlawful practice or refusal to cooperate occurred.
(2)A complaint alleging a violation of Section 52.5 of the Civil Code shall not be filed pursuant to this article after the expiration of the applicable period of time for commencing a civil action pursuant to that section.
(3)A complaint alleging a violation of Article 9.5 (commencing with Section 11135) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 shall not be filed pursuant to this article after the expiration of three years from the date that the alleged unlawful practice occurred or refusal to cooperate occurred.
(4)A complaint alleging a violation of Section 1197.5 of the Labor Code shall not be filed pursuant to this article after the expiration of the applicable period of time for commencing a civil action pursuant to that section.
(5)A complaint alleging a violation of Section 51.9 of the Civil Code or any other violation of Article 1 (commencing with Section 12940) of Chapter 6 shall not be filed after the expiration of three years from the date upon which the unlawful practice or refusal to cooperate occurred.
(6)Notwithstanding the filing deadlines contained in this subdivision or in Section 12980, a complaint filed by the director, or the directors authorized representative, or a complaint treated by the director or the directors representative, as a group or class complaint pursuant to Section 12961 may allege any violation of this part that occurred within a period of 10 years or fewer before the date the complaint was filed, or more than 10 years before the complaint was filed if it is determined to be reasonable by a court of competent jurisdiction.
(6)(7)Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) through (5), to (6), inclusive, the filing periods set forth by this section may be extended as follows:
(A)For a period of time not to exceed 90 days following the expiration of the applicable filing deadline, if a person allegedly aggrieved by an unlawful practice first obtained knowledge of the facts of the alleged unlawful practice during the 90 days following the expiration of the applicable filing deadline.
(B)For a period of time not to exceed one year following a rebutted presumption of the identity of the persons employer under Section 12928, in order to allow a person allegedly aggrieved by an unlawful practice to make a substitute identification of the actual employer.
(C)For a period of time, not to exceed one year from the date the person aggrieved by an alleged violation of Section 51.7 of the Civil Code becomes aware of the identity of a person liable for the alleged violation, but in no case exceeding three years from the date of the alleged violation if during that period the aggrieved person is unaware of the identity of any person liable for the alleged violation.
(D)For a period of time not to exceed one year from the date that a person allegedly aggrieved by an unlawful practice attains the age of majority.
(E)For the periods of time specified in Section 52.5 of the Civil Code for complaints alleging a violation of that section.
(7)The filing deadlines contained in this subdivision or in Section 12980 shall not apply to a complaint filed by the director, or the directors authorized representative, or treated by the director or the directors representative, as a group or class complaint pursuant to Section 12961. This paragraph is declarative of, and clarifies, existing law.(f)(1)Notwithstanding any tolling or limitations period under any other law, the time for a complainant to file a civil action under a statute referenced in this section shall be tolled during the period commencing with the filing of a complaint with the department for an alleged violation of that statute until either of the following:
(A)The department files a civil action for the alleged violation under this part.
(B)One year after the department issues either of the following:
(i)Written notice to a complainant that it has closed its investigation without electing to file a civil action for the alleged violation.
(ii)If the complainant timely appeals within the department the closure of their complaint, written notice to the complainant that it has remained closed following the appeal within the department.
(2)The tolling provided under this subdivision shall apply retroactively.
(3)This subdivision is not intended to revive claims that have already lapsed.
SEC. 3.Section 12965 of the Government Code is amended to read:12965.(a)(1)In the case of failure to eliminate an unlawful practice under this part through conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion, or in advance thereof if circumstances warrant, the director in the directors discretion may bring a civil action in the name of the department, acting in the public interest, on behalf of the person claiming to be aggrieved.
(2)Prior to filing a civil action, the department shall require all parties to participate in mandatory dispute resolution in the departments internal dispute resolution division free of charge to the parties in an effort to resolve the dispute without litigation.
(3)In a civil action, the person claiming to be aggrieved shall be the real party in interest and shall have the right to participate as a party and be represented by that persons own counsel.
(4)A civil action under this subdivision shall be brought in a county in which the department has an office, in a county in which unlawful practices are alleged to have been committed, in the county in which records relevant to the alleged unlawful practices are maintained and administered, in the county in which the person claiming to be aggrieved would have worked or would have had access to public accommodation, but for the alleged unlawful practices, in the county of the defendants residence or principal office, or, if the civil action includes class or group allegations on behalf of the department, in any county in the state.
(5)(A)A complaint treated by the director as a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action pursuant to Section 12961, a civil action shall be brought, if at all, within two years after the filing of the complaint.
(B)For a complaint alleging a violation of Section 51.7 of the Civil Code, a civil action shall be brought, if at all, within two years after the filing of the complaint.
(C)For a complaint other than those specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B), a civil action shall be brought, if at all, within one year after the filing of a complaint.
(D)The deadlines specified in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), shall be tolled, as follows:
(i)During a mandatory or voluntary dispute resolution proceeding commencing on the date the department refers the case to its dispute resolution division and ending on the date the departments dispute resolution division closes its mediation record and returns the case to the division that referred it.
(ii)For the amount of time specified in any written agreement between the department and a respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable deadline.
(iii)For the length of time for which the departments investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel as provided in subdivision (g) of Section 12963.5.
(iv)During a timely appeal within the department of the closure of the complaint by the department.
(b)For purposes of this section, filing a complaint means filing a verified complaint.
(c)(1)(A)Except as specified in subparagraph (B), if a civil action is not brought by the department pursuant to subdivision (a) within 150 days after the filing of a complaint, or if the department earlier determines that no civil action will be brought pursuant to subdivision (a), the department shall promptly notify, in writing, the person claiming to be aggrieved that the department shall issue, on request, the right-to-sue notice. If the person claiming to be aggrieved does not request a right-to-sue notice, the department shall issue the notice upon completion of its investigation, and not later than one year after the filing of the complaint. However, if the department determines, in its discretion, that the aggrieved persons complaint relates in whole or in part to a complaint filed in the name of the director or a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action pursuant to Section 12961, the department shall issue any right-to-sue notice upon request by the person claiming to be aggrieved or after the directors or group or class complaint has been fully and finally disposed of and all administrative proceedings, civil actions, appeals, or related proceedings have terminated.
(B)For a complaint treated as a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 12961, the department shall issue a right-to-sue notice upon completion of its investigation, and not later than two years after the filing of the complaint.
(C)The notices specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall indicate that the person claiming to be aggrieved may bring a civil action under this part against the person, employer, labor organization, or employment agency named in the verified complaint within one year from the date of that notice.
(D)This paragraph applies only to complaints alleging unlawful employment practices under Article 1 (commencing with Section 12940) of Chapter 6.
(E)The deadlines specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall be tolled, as follows:
(i)During a mandatory or voluntary dispute resolution proceeding commencing on the date the department refers the case to its dispute resolution division and ending on the date the departments dispute resolution division closes its mediation record and returns the case to the division that referred it.
(ii)For the amount of time specified in any written agreement between the department and a respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable deadline.
(iii)For the length of time for which the departments investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as provided in subdivision (g) of Section 12963.5.
(iv)During a timely appeal within the department of the closure of the complaint by the department.
(2)A city, county, or district attorney in a location having an enforcement unit established on or before March 1, 1991, pursuant to a local ordinance enacted for the purpose of prosecuting HIV/AIDS discrimination claims, acting on behalf of any person claiming to be aggrieved due to HIV/AIDS discrimination, may also bring a civil action under this part against the person, employer, labor organization, or employment agency named in the notice.
(3)The superior courts of the State of California shall have jurisdiction of actions brought pursuant to this section, and the aggrieved person may file in these courts. An action may be brought in any county in the state in which the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, in the county in which the records relevant to the practice are maintained and administered, or in the county in which the aggrieved person would have worked or would have had access to the public accommodation but for the alleged unlawful practice, but if the defendant is not found within any of these counties, an action may be brought within the county of the defendants residence or principal office.
(4)A copy of any complaint filed pursuant to this part shall be served on the principal offices of the department. The remedy for failure to send a copy of a complaint is an order to do so.
(5)A civil action brought pursuant to this section shall not be filed as class actions and shall not be maintained as class actions by the person or persons claiming to be aggrieved if those persons have filed a civil class action in the federal courts alleging a comparable claim of employment discrimination against the same defendant or defendants.
(6)In civil actions brought under this section, the court, in its discretion, may award to the prevailing party, including the department, reasonable attorneys fees and costs, including expert witness fees, except that, notwithstanding Section 998 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a prevailing defendant shall not be awarded fees and costs unless the court finds the action was frivolous, unreasonable, or groundless when brought, or the plaintiff continued to litigate after it clearly became so.
(d)A court may grant as relief in any action filed pursuant to subdivision (a) any relief a court is empowered to grant in a civil action brought pursuant to subdivision (c), in addition to any other relief that, in the judgment of the court, will effectuate the purpose of this part. This relief may include a requirement that the employer conduct training for all employees, supervisors, and management on the requirements of this part, the rights and remedies of those who allege a violation of this part, and the employers internal grievance procedures. This relief may also include any relief available under any law enforced by the department pursuant to Section 12930. In addition, in order to vindicate the purposes and policies of this part, a court may assess against the defendant, if the civil complaint or amended civil complaint so prays, a civil penalty of up to twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) to be awarded to a person denied any right provided for by Section 51.7 of the Civil Code, as an unlawful practice prohibited under this part.
(e)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (c), the one-year statute of limitations, commencing from the date of the right-to-sue notice by the department to the person claiming to be aggrieved, shall be tolled when all of the following requirements have been met:
(A)A charge of discrimination or harassment is timely filed concurrently with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the department.
(B)The investigation of the charge is deferred by the department to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
(C)A right-to-sue notice is issued to the person claiming to be aggrieved upon deferral of the charge by the department to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
(2)The time for commencing an action for which the statute of limitations is tolled under paragraph (1) expires when the federal right-to-sue period to commence a civil action expires, or one year from the date of the right-to-sue notice by the department, whichever is later.
(3)This subdivision is intended to codify the holding in Downs v. Department of Water and Power of City of Los Angeles (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1093.
(f)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (c), the one-year statute of limitations, commencing from the date of the right-to-sue notice by the department, to the person claiming to be aggrieved, shall be tolled when all of the following requirements have been met:
(A)A charge of discrimination or harassment is timely filed concurrently with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the department.
(B)The investigation of the charge is deferred by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to the Civil Rights Department.
(C)After investigation and determination by the department, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission agrees to perform a substantial weight review of the determination of the department or conducts its own investigation of the claim filed by the aggrieved person.
(2)The time for commencing an action for which the statute of limitations is tolled under paragraph (1) shall expire when the federal right-to-sue period to commence a civil action expires, or one year from the date of the right-to-sue notice by the department, whichever is later.
SEC. 4.Section 12980 of the Government Code is amended to read:12980.This article governs the procedure for the prevention and elimination of discrimination in housing made unlawful pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 12955) of Chapter 6.
(a)Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged violation of Section 12955, 12955.1, or 12955.7 may file with the department a verified complaint in writing that shall state the name and address of the person alleged to have committed the violation complained of, and that shall set forth the particulars of the alleged violation and contain any other information required by the department.
The filing of a complaint and pursuit of conciliation or remedy under this part shall not prejudice the complainants right to pursue effective judicial relief under other applicable laws, but if a civil action has been filed under Section 52 of the Civil Code, the department shall terminate proceedings upon notification of the entry of final judgment unless the judgment is a dismissal entered at the complainants request.
No complaint may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated.
(b)The Attorney General or the director may, in a like manner, make, sign, and file complaints citing practices that appear to violate the purpose of this part or any specific provisions of this part relating to housing discrimination.
(c)The department may thereupon proceed upon the complaint in the same manner and with the same powers as provided in this part in the case of an unlawful practice, except that where the provisions of this article provide greater rights and remedies to an aggrieved person than the provisions of Article 1 (commencing with Section 12960), the provisions of this article shall prevail.
(d)Upon the filing of a complaint, the department shall serve notice upon the complainant of the time limits, rights of the parties, and choice of forums provided for under the law.
(e)The department shall commence proceedings with respect to a complaint within 30 days of filing of the complaint.
(f)An investigation of allegations contained in any complaint filed with the department shall be completed within 100 days after receipt of the complaint, unless it is impracticable to do so. If the investigation is not completed within 100 days, the complainant and respondent shall be notified, in writing, of the departments reasons for not doing so.
(g)Upon the conclusion of each investigation, the department shall prepare a final investigative report containing all of the following:
(1)The names of any witnesses and the dates of any contacts with those witnesses.
(2)A summary of the dates of any correspondence or other contacts with the aggrieved persons or the respondent.
(3)A summary of witness statements.
(4)Answers to interrogatories.
(5)A summary description of other pertinent records.
A final investigative report may be amended if additional evidence is later discovered.
(h)If a civil action is not brought by the department within 100 days after the filing of a complaint, or if the department earlier determines that no civil action will be brought, the department shall promptly notify the person claiming to be aggrieved. This notice shall, in any event, be issued no more than 30 days after the date of the determination or 30 days after the date of the expiration of the 100-day period, whichever date first occurs. The notice shall indicate that the person claiming to be aggrieved may bring a civil action under this part against the person named in the verified complaint within the time period specified in Section 12989.1. The notice shall also indicate, unless the department has determined that no civil action will be brought, that the person claiming to be aggrieved has the option of continuing to seek redress for the alleged discrimination through the procedures of the department if the person does not desire to file a civil action. The superior courts of the State of California shall have jurisdiction of these actions, and the aggrieved person may file in these courts. The action may be brought in any county in the state in which the violation is alleged to have been committed, or in the county in which the records relevant to the alleged violation are maintained and administered, but if the defendant is not found within that county, the action may be brought within the county of the defendants residence or principal office. A copy of any complaint filed pursuant to this part shall be served on the principal offices of the department. The remedy for failure to send a copy of a complaint is an order to do so. In a civil action brought under this section, the court, in its discretion, may award to the prevailing party reasonable attorneys fees.
(i)All agreements reached in settlement of any housing discrimination complaint filed pursuant to this section shall be made public, unless otherwise agreed by the complainant and respondent, and the department determines that the disclosure is not required to further the purposes of the act.
(j)All agreements reached in settlement of any housing discrimination complaint filed pursuant to this section shall be agreements between the respondent and complainant, and shall be subject to approval by the department.
SEC. 5.Section 12981 of the Government Code is amended to read:12981.(a)(1)In the case of failure to eliminate a violation of Section 12955, 12955.1, or 12955.7 that has occurred, or is about to occur, through conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion, or in advance thereof if circumstances warrant, the director shall bring a civil action in the name of the department, acting in the public interest, on behalf of the aggrieved person as a real party in interest, notwithstanding Section 12971, in the same manner and with the same powers as provided in Section 12965, except that where the provisions of this article provide greater rights and remedies to an aggrieved person than Section 12965, the provisions of this article shall prevail.
(2)Prior to filing a civil action pursuant to paragraph (1), the department shall require all parties to participate in the departments mandatory dispute resolution division free of charge to the parties in an effort to resolve the dispute without litigation.
(3)A civil action brought pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be filed within 100 days after the filing of a complaint unless it is impracticable to do so. This deadline to file a civil action pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be tolled during a mandatory or voluntary dispute resolution proceeding commencing on the date the department refers the case to its dispute resolution division and ending on the date the departments dispute resolution division closes its mediation record and returns the case to the division that referred it.
(4)Any aggrieved person may intervene as a matter of right in the proceeding, and the appeal or other judicial review of that proceeding.
(b)If the department determines that an allegation concerns the legality of any zoning or other land use law or ordinance, the department or the Attorney General shall take appropriate action with respect to the complaint according to the procedures established in this part for other complaints of housing discrimination.
(c)Within one year of the effective date of every final order or decision issued pursuant to this part, the department shall conduct a compliance review to determine whether the order or decision has been fully obeyed and implemented.
(d)Whenever the department has reasonable cause to believe that a respondent has breached a conciliation agreement signed by the department, the department shall initiate a civil action to enforce the agreement.
As used in this part in connection with unlawful practices, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context:
(a)Affirmative relief or prospective relief includes the authority to order reinstatement of an employee, awards of backpay, reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, hiring, transfers, reassignments, grants of tenure, promotions, cease and desist orders, posting of notices, training of personnel, testing, expunging of records, reporting of records, and any other similar relief that is intended to correct unlawful practices under this part.
(b)Age refers to the chronological age of any individual who has reached a 40th birthday.
(c)Except as provided by Section 12926.05, employee does not include any individual employed by that persons parent, spouse, or child or any individual employed under a special license in a nonprofit sheltered workshop or rehabilitation facility.
(d)Employer includes any person regularly employing five or more persons, or any person acting as an agent of an employer, directly or indirectly, the state or any political or civil subdivision of the state, and cities, except as follows:
Employer does not include a religious association or corporation not organized for private profit.
(e)Employment agency includes any person undertaking for compensation to procure employees or opportunities to work.
(f)Essential functions means the fundamental job duties of the employment position the individual with a disability holds or desires. Essential functions does not include the marginal functions of the position.
(1)A job function may be considered essential for any of several reasons, including, but not limited to, any one or more of the following:
(A)The function may be essential because the reason the position exists is to perform that function.
(B)The function may be essential because of the limited number of employees available among whom the performance of that job function can be distributed.
(C)The function may be highly specialized, so that the incumbent in the position is hired based on expertise or the ability to perform a particular function.
(2)Evidence of whether a particular function is essential includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)The employers judgment as to which functions are essential.
(B)Written job descriptions prepared before advertising or interviewing applicants for the job.
(C)The amount of time spent on the job performing the function.
(D)The consequences of not requiring the incumbent to perform the function.
(E)The terms of a collective bargaining agreement.
(F)The work experiences of past incumbents in the job.
(G)The current work experience of incumbents in similar jobs.
(g)(1)Genetic information means, with respect to any individual, information about any of the following:
(A)The individuals genetic tests.
(B)The genetic tests of family members of the individual.
(C)The manifestation of a disease or disorder in family members of the individual.
(2)Genetic information includes any request for, or receipt of, genetic services, or participation in clinical research that includes genetic services, by an individual or any family member of the individual.
(3)Genetic information does not include information about the sex or age of any individual.
(h)Labor organization includes any organization that exists and is constituted for the purpose, in whole or in part, of collective bargaining or of dealing with employers concerning grievances, terms or conditions of employment, or of other mutual aid or protection.
(i)Medical condition means either of the following:
(1)Any health impairment related to or associated with a diagnosis of cancer or a record or history of cancer.
(2)Genetic characteristics. For purposes of this section, genetic characteristics means either of the following:
(A)Any scientifically or medically identifiable gene or chromosome, or combination or alteration thereof, that is known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that is determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that is presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(B)Inherited characteristics that may derive from the individual or family member, that are known to be a cause of a disease or disorder in a person or that persons offspring, or that are determined to be associated with a statistically increased risk of development of a disease or disorder, and that are presently not associated with any symptoms of any disease or disorder.
(j)Mental disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any mental or psychological disorder or condition, such as intellectual disability, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness, or specific learning disabilities, that limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(A)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures, such as medications, assistive devices, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(B)A mental or psychological disorder or condition limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(C)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and shall include physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other mental or psychological disorder or condition not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a mental or psychological disorder or condition described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any mental condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a mental or psychological disorder or condition that has no present disabling effect, but that may become a mental disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
Mental disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(k)Veteran or military status means a member or veteran of the United States Armed Forces, United States Armed Forces Reserve, the United States National Guard, and the California National Guard.
(l)On the bases enumerated in this part means or refers to discrimination on the basis of one or more of the following: race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status.
(m)Physical disability includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Having any physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss that does both of the following:
(A)Affects one or more of the following body systems: neurological, immunological, musculoskeletal, special sense organs, respiratory, including speech organs, cardiovascular, reproductive, digestive, genitourinary, hemic and lymphatic, skin, and endocrine.
(B)Limits a major life activity. For purposes of this section:
(i)Limits shall be determined without regard to mitigating measures such as medications, assistive devices, prosthetics, or reasonable accommodations, unless the mitigating measure itself limits a major life activity.
(ii)A physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss limits a major life activity if it makes the achievement of the major life activity difficult.
(iii)Major life activities shall be broadly construed and includes physical, mental, and social activities and working.
(2)Any other health impairment not described in paragraph (1) that requires special education or related services.
(3)Having a record or history of a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment described in paragraph (1) or (2), which is known to the employer or other entity covered by this part.
(4)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, any physical condition that makes achievement of a major life activity difficult.
(5)Being regarded or treated by the employer or other entity covered by this part as having, or having had, a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, or health impairment that has no present disabling effect but may become a physical disability as described in paragraph (1) or (2).
(6)Physical disability does not include sexual behavior disorders, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from the current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs.
(n)Notwithstanding subdivisions (j) and (m), if the definition of disability used in the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-336) would result in broader protection of the civil rights of individuals with a mental disability or physical disability, as defined in subdivision (j) or (m), or would include any medical condition not included within those definitions, then that broader protection or coverage shall be deemed incorporated by reference into, and shall prevail over conflicting provisions of, the definitions in subdivisions (j) and (m).
(o)Race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or veteran or military status includes a perception that the person has any of those characteristics or that the person is associated with a person who has, or is perceived to have, any of those characteristics.
(p)Reasonable accommodation may include either of the following:
(1)Making existing facilities used by employees readily accessible to, and usable by, individuals with disabilities.
(2)Job restructuring, part-time or modified work schedules, reassignment to a vacant position, acquisition or modification of equipment or devices, adjustment or modifications of examinations, training materials or policies, the provision of qualified readers or interpreters, and other similar accommodations for individuals with disabilities.
(q)Religious creed, religion, religious observance, religious belief, and creed include all aspects of religious belief, observance, and practice, including religious dress and grooming practices. Religious dress practice shall be construed broadly to include the wearing or carrying of religious clothing, head or face coverings, jewelry, artifacts, and any other item that is part of an individual observing a religious creed. Religious grooming practice shall be construed broadly to include all forms of head, facial, and body hair that are part of an individual observing a religious creed.
(r)(1)Sex includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(A)Pregnancy or medical conditions related to pregnancy.
(B)Childbirth or medical conditions related to childbirth.
(C)Breastfeeding or medical conditions related to breastfeeding.
(2)Sex also includes, but is not limited to, a persons gender. Gender means sex, and includes a persons gender identity and gender expression. Gender expression means a persons gender-related appearance and behavior whether or not stereotypically associated with the persons assigned sex at birth.
(s)Sexual orientation means heterosexuality, homosexuality, and bisexuality.
(t)Supervisor means any individual having the authority, in the interest of the employer, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or the responsibility to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend that action, if, in connection with the foregoing, the exercise of that authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment.
(u)Undue hardship means an action requiring significant difficulty or expense, when considered in light of the following factors:
(1)The nature and cost of the accommodation needed.
(2)The overall financial resources of the facilities involved in the provision of the reasonable accommodations, the number of persons employed at the facility, and the effect on expenses and resources or the impact otherwise of these accommodations upon the operation of the facility.
(3)The overall financial resources of the covered entity, the overall size of the business of a covered entity with respect to the number of employees, and the number, type, and location of its facilities.
(4)The type of operations, including the composition, structure, and functions of the workforce of the entity.
(5)The geographic separateness or administrative or fiscal relationship of the facility or facilities.
(v)National origin discrimination includes, but is not limited to, discrimination on the basis of possessing a drivers license or identification card granted under Section 12801.9 of the Vehicle Code.
(w)Race is inclusive of traits historically associated with race, including, but not limited to, hair texture and protective hairstyles.
(x)Protective hairstyles includes, but is not limited to, such hairstyles as braids, locks, and twists.
(y)Reproductive health decisionmaking includes, but is not limited to, a decision to use or access a particular drug, device, product, or medical service for reproductive health. This subdivision and other provisions in this part relating to reproductive health decisionmaking shall not be construed to mean that subdivision (r) of this section and other provisions in this part related to sex do not include reproductive health decisionmaking.
(z)Group or class complaint includes any complaint alleging a pattern or practice. This subdivision is declarative of, and clarifies, existing law.
SEC. 2.Section 12960 of the Government Code is amended to read:12960.(a)This article governs the procedure for the prevention and elimination of practices made unlawful pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 12940) of Chapter 6.
(b)For purposes of this section, filing a complaint means filing an intake form with the department and the operative date of the verified complaint relates back to the filing of the intake form.
(c)Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged unlawful practice may file with the department a verified complaint, in writing, that shall state the name and address of the person, employer, labor organization, or employment agency alleged to have committed the unlawful practice complained of, and that shall set forth the particulars thereof and contain other information as may be required by the department. The director or the directors authorized representative may in like manner, on that persons own motion, make, sign, and file a complaint.
(d)Any employer whose employees, or some of them, refuse or threaten to refuse to cooperate with this part may file with the department a verified complaint asking for assistance by conciliation or other remedial action.
(e)(1)A complaint alleging a violation of Section 51, 51.5, 51.7, 54, 54.1, or 54.2 of the Civil Code shall not be filed pursuant to this article after the expiration of one year from the date that the alleged unlawful practice or refusal to cooperate occurred.
(2)A complaint alleging a violation of Section 52.5 of the Civil Code shall not be filed pursuant to this article after the expiration of the applicable period of time for commencing a civil action pursuant to that section.
(3)A complaint alleging a violation of Article 9.5 (commencing with Section 11135) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 shall not be filed pursuant to this article after the expiration of three years from the date that the alleged unlawful practice occurred or refusal to cooperate occurred.
(4)A complaint alleging a violation of Section 1197.5 of the Labor Code shall not be filed pursuant to this article after the expiration of the applicable period of time for commencing a civil action pursuant to that section.
(5)A complaint alleging a violation of Section 51.9 of the Civil Code or any other violation of Article 1 (commencing with Section 12940) of Chapter 6 shall not be filed after the expiration of three years from the date upon which the unlawful practice or refusal to cooperate occurred.
(6)Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) through (5), inclusive, the filing periods set forth by this section may be extended as follows:
(A)For a period of time not to exceed 90 days following the expiration of the applicable filing deadline, if a person allegedly aggrieved by an unlawful practice first obtained knowledge of the facts of the alleged unlawful practice during the 90 days following the expiration of the applicable filing deadline.
(B)For a period of time not to exceed one year following a rebutted presumption of the identity of the persons employer under Section 12928, in order to allow a person allegedly aggrieved by an unlawful practice to make a substitute identification of the actual employer.
(C)For a period of time, not to exceed one year from the date the person aggrieved by an alleged violation of Section 51.7 of the Civil Code becomes aware of the identity of a person liable for the alleged violation, but in no case exceeding three years from the date of the alleged violation if during that period the aggrieved person is unaware of the identity of any person liable for the alleged violation.
(D)For a period of time not to exceed one year from the date that a person allegedly aggrieved by an unlawful practice attains the age of majority.
(E)For the periods of time specified in Section 52.5 of the Civil Code for complaints alleging a violation of that section.
(7)The filing deadlines contained in this subdivision or in Section 12980 shall not apply to a complaint filed by the director, or the directors authorized representative, or treated by the director or the directors representative, as a group or class complaint pursuant to Section 12961. This paragraph is declarative of, and clarifies, existing law.
(f)(1)Notwithstanding any tolling or limitations period under any other law, the time for a complainant to file a civil action under a statute referenced in this section shall be tolled during the period commencing with the filing of a complaint with the department for an alleged violation of that statute until either of the following:
(A)The department files a civil action for the alleged violation under this part.
(B)One year after the department issues written either of the following:
(i)Written notice to a complainant that it has closed its investigation without electing to file a civil action for the alleged violation.
(ii)If the complainant timely appeals within the department the closure of their complaint, written notice to the complainant that it has remained closed following the appeal within the department.
(2)The tolling provided under this subdivision shall apply retroactively.
(3)This subdivision is not intended to revive claims that have already lapsed.
SEC. 3.Section 12965 of the Government Code is amended to read:12965.(a)(1)In the case of failure to eliminate an unlawful practice under this part through conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion, or in advance thereof if circumstances warrant, the director in the directors discretion may bring a civil action in the name of the department, acting in the public interest, on behalf of the person claiming to be aggrieved.
(2)Prior to filing a civil action, the department shall require all parties to participate in mandatory dispute resolution in the departments internal dispute resolution division free of charge to the parties in an effort to resolve the dispute without litigation.
(3)In a civil action, the person claiming to be aggrieved shall be the real party in interest and shall have the right to participate as a party and be represented by that persons own counsel.
(4)A civil action under this subdivision shall be brought in a county in which the department has an office, in a county in which unlawful practices are alleged to have been committed, in the county in which records relevant to the alleged unlawful practices are maintained and administered, in the county in which the person claiming to be aggrieved would have worked or would have had access to public accommodation, but for the alleged unlawful practices, in the county of the defendants residence or principal office, or, if the civil action includes class or group allegations on behalf of the department, in any county in the state.
(5)(A)A complaint treated by the director as a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action pursuant to Section 12961, a civil action shall be brought, if at all, within two years after the filing of the complaint.
(B)For a complaint alleging a violation of Section 51.7 of the Civil Code, a civil action shall be brought, if at all, within two years after the filing of the complaint.
(C)For a complaint other than those specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B), a civil action shall be brought, if at all, within one year after the filing of a complaint.
(D)The deadlines specified in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), shall be tolled during tolled, as follows:
(i)During a mandatory or voluntary dispute resolution proceeding commencing on the date the department refers the case to its dispute resolution division and ending on the date the departments dispute resolution division closes its mediation record and returns the case to the division that referred it.
(ii)For the amount of time specified in any written agreement between the department and a respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable deadline.
(iii)For the length of time for which the departments investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel as provided in subdivision (g) of Section 12963.5.
(iv)During a timely appeal within the department of the closure of the complaint by the department.
(b)For purposes of this section, filing a complaint means filing a verified complaint.
(c)(1)(A)Except as specified in subparagraph (B), if a civil action is not brought by the department pursuant to subdivision (a) within 150 days after the filing of a complaint, or if the department earlier determines that no civil action will be brought pursuant to subdivision (a), the department shall promptly notify, in writing, the person claiming to be aggrieved that the department shall issue, on request, the right-to-sue notice. If the person claiming to be aggrieved does not request a right-to-sue notice, the department shall issue the notice upon completion of its investigation, and not later than one year after the filing of the complaint. However, if the department determines, in its discretion, that the aggrieved persons complaint relates in whole or in part to a complaint filed in the name of the director or a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action pursuant to Section 12961, the department shall issue any right-to-sue notice upon request by the person claiming to be aggrieved or after the directors or group or class complaint has been fully and finally disposed of and all administrative proceedings, civil actions, appeals, or related proceedings have terminated.
(B)For a complaint treated as a group or class complaint for purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 12961, the department shall issue a right-to-sue notice upon completion of its investigation, and not later than two years after the filing of the complaint.
(C)The notices specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall indicate that the person claiming to be aggrieved may bring a civil action under this part against the person, employer, labor organization, or employment agency named in the verified complaint within one year from the date of that notice.
(D)This paragraph applies only to complaints alleging unlawful employment practices under Article 1 (commencing with Section 12940) of Chapter 6.
(E)The deadlines specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall be tolled during tolled, as follows:
(i)During a mandatory or voluntary dispute resolution proceeding commencing on the date the department refers the case to its dispute resolution division and ending on the date the departments dispute resolution division closes its mediation record and returns the case to the division that referred it.
(ii)For the amount of time specified in any written agreement between the department and a respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable deadline.
(iii)For the length of time for which the departments investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as provided in subdivision (g) of Section 12963.5.
(iv)During a timely appeal within the department of the closure of the complaint by the department.
(2)A city, county, or district attorney in a location having an enforcement unit established on or before March 1, 1991, pursuant to a local ordinance enacted for the purpose of prosecuting HIV/AIDS discrimination claims, acting on behalf of any person claiming to be aggrieved due to HIV/AIDS discrimination, may also bring a civil action under this part against the person, employer, labor organization, or employment agency named in the notice.
(3)The superior courts of the State of California shall have jurisdiction of actions brought pursuant to this section, and the aggrieved person may file in these courts. An action may be brought in any county in the state in which the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, in the county in which the records relevant to the practice are maintained and administered, or in the county in which the aggrieved person would have worked or would have had access to the public accommodation but for the alleged unlawful practice, but if the defendant is not found within any of these counties, an action may be brought within the county of the defendants residence or principal office.
(4)A copy of any complaint filed pursuant to this part shall be served on the principal offices of the department. The remedy for failure to send a copy of a complaint is an order to do so.
(5)A civil action brought pursuant to this section shall not be filed as class actions and shall not be maintained as class actions by the person or persons claiming to be aggrieved if those persons have filed a civil class action in the federal courts alleging a comparable claim of employment discrimination against the same defendant or defendants.
(6)In civil actions brought under this section, the court, in its discretion, may award to the prevailing party, including the department, reasonable attorneys fees and costs, including expert witness fees, except that, notwithstanding Section 998 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a prevailing defendant shall not be awarded fees and costs unless the court finds the action was frivolous, unreasonable, or groundless when brought, or the plaintiff continued to litigate after it clearly became so.
(d)A court may grant as relief in any action filed pursuant to subdivision (a) any relief a court is empowered to grant in a civil action brought pursuant to subdivision (c), in addition to any other relief that, in the judgment of the court, will effectuate the purpose of this part. This relief may include a requirement that the employer conduct training for all employees, supervisors, and management on the requirements of this part, the rights and remedies of those who allege a violation of this part, and the employers internal grievance procedures. This relief may also include any relief available under any law enforced by the department pursuant to Section 12930. In addition, in order to vindicate the purposes and policies of this part, a court may assess against the defendant, if the civil complaint or amended civil complaint so prays, a civil penalty of up to twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) to be awarded to a person denied any right provided for by Section 51.7 of the Civil Code, as an unlawful practice prohibited under this part.
(e)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (c), the one-year statute of limitations, commencing from the date of the right-to-sue notice by the department to the person claiming to be aggrieved, shall be tolled when all of the following requirements have been met:
(A)A charge of discrimination or harassment is timely filed concurrently with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the department.
(B)The investigation of the charge is deferred by the department to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
(C)A right-to-sue notice is issued to the person claiming to be aggrieved upon deferral of the charge by the department to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
(2)The time for commencing an action for which the statute of limitations is tolled under paragraph (1) expires when the federal right-to-sue period to commence a civil action expires, or one year from the date of the right-to-sue notice by the department, whichever is later.
(3)This subdivision is intended to codify the holding in Downs v. Department of Water and Power of City of Los Angeles (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1093.
(f)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (c), the one-year statute of limitations, commencing from the date of the right-to-sue notice by the department, to the person claiming to be aggrieved, shall be tolled when all of the following requirements have been met:
(A)A charge of discrimination or harassment is timely filed concurrently with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the department.
(B)The investigation of the charge is deferred by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to the Civil Rights Department.
(C)After investigation and determination by the department, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission agrees to perform a substantial weight review of the determination of the department or conducts its own investigation of the claim filed by the aggrieved person.
(2)The time for commencing an action for which the statute of limitations is tolled under paragraph (1) shall expire when the federal right-to-sue period to commence a civil action expires, or one year from the date of the right-to-sue notice by the department, whichever is later.
SEC. 4.Section 12980 of the Government Code is amended to read:12980.This article governs the procedure for the prevention and elimination of discrimination in housing made unlawful pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 12955) of Chapter 6.
(a)Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged violation of Section 12955, 12955.1, or 12955.7 may file with the department a verified complaint in writing that shall state the name and address of the person alleged to have committed the violation complained of, and that shall set forth the particulars of the alleged violation and contain any other information required by the department.
The filing of a complaint and pursuit of conciliation or remedy under this part shall not prejudice the complainants right to pursue effective judicial relief under other applicable laws, but if a civil action has been filed under Section 52 of the Civil Code, the department shall terminate proceedings upon notification of the entry of final judgment unless the judgment is a dismissal entered at the complainants request.
No complaint may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated.
(b)The Attorney General or the director may, in a like manner, make, sign, and file complaints citing practices that appear to violate the purpose of this part or any specific provisions of this part relating to housing discrimination.
No complaint may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated.(c)The department may thereupon proceed upon the complaint in the same manner and with the same powers as provided in this part in the case of an unlawful practice, except that where the provisions of this article provide greater rights and remedies to an aggrieved person than the provisions of Article 1 (commencing with Section 12960), the provisions of this article shall prevail.
(d)Upon the filing of a complaint, the department shall serve notice upon the complainant of the time limits, rights of the parties, and choice of forums provided for under the law.
(e)The department shall commence proceedings with respect to a complaint within 30 days of filing of the complaint.
(f)An investigation of allegations contained in any complaint filed with the department shall be completed within 100 days after receipt of the complaint, unless it is impracticable to do so. If the investigation is not completed within 100 days, the complainant and respondent shall be notified, in writing, of the departments reasons for not doing so.
(g)Upon the conclusion of each investigation, the department shall prepare a final investigative report containing all of the following:
(1)The names of any witnesses and the dates of any contacts with those witnesses.
(2)A summary of the dates of any correspondence or other contacts with the aggrieved persons or the respondent.
(3)A summary of witness statements.
(4)Answers to interrogatories.
(5)A summary description of other pertinent records.
A final investigative report may be amended if additional evidence is later discovered.
(h)If a civil action is not brought by the department within 100 days after the filing of a complaint, or if the department earlier determines that no civil action will be brought, the department shall promptly notify the person claiming to be aggrieved. This notice shall, in any event, be issued no more than 30 days after the date of the determination or 30 days after the date of the expiration of the 100-day period, whichever date first occurs. The notice shall indicate that the person claiming to be aggrieved may bring a civil action under this part against the person named in the verified complaint within the time period specified in Section 12989.1. The notice shall also indicate, unless the department has determined that no civil action will be brought, that the person claiming to be aggrieved has the option of continuing to seek redress for the alleged discrimination through the procedures of the department if the person does not desire to file a civil action. The superior courts of the State of California shall have jurisdiction of these actions, and the aggrieved person may file in these courts. The action may be brought in any county in the state in which the violation is alleged to have been committed, or in the county in which the records relevant to the alleged violation are maintained and administered, but if the defendant is not found within that county, the action may be brought within the county of the defendants residence or principal office. A copy of any complaint filed pursuant to this part shall be served on the principal offices of the department. The remedy for failure to send a copy of a complaint is an order to do so. In a civil action brought under this section, the court, in its discretion, may award to the prevailing party reasonable attorneys fees.
(i)All agreements reached in settlement of any housing discrimination complaint filed pursuant to this section shall be made public, unless otherwise agreed by the complainant and respondent, and the department determines that the disclosure is not required to further the purposes of the act.
(j)All agreements reached in settlement of any housing discrimination complaint filed pursuant to this section shall be agreements between the respondent and complainant, and shall be subject to approval by the department.
SEC. 5.Section 12981 of the Government Code is amended to read:12981.(a)(1)In the case of failure to eliminate a violation of Section 12955, 12955.1, or 12955.7 that has occurred, or is about to occur, through conference, conciliation, mediation, or persuasion, or in advance thereof if circumstances warrant, the director shall bring a civil action in the name of the department, acting in the public interest, on behalf of the aggrieved person as a real party in interest, notwithstanding Section 12971, in the same manner and with the same powers as provided in Section 12965, except that where the provisions of this article provide greater rights and remedies to an aggrieved person than Section 12965, the provisions of this article shall prevail.
(2)Prior to filing a civil action pursuant to paragraph (1), the department shall require all parties to participate in the departments mandatory dispute resolution division free of charge to the parties in an effort to resolve the dispute without litigation.
(3)A civil action brought pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be filed within 100 days after the filing of a complaint unless it is impracticable to do so. This deadline to file a civil action pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be tolled during a mandatory or voluntary dispute resolution proceeding commencing on the date the department refers the case to its dispute resolution division and ending on the date the departments dispute resolution division closes its mediation record and returns the case to the division that referred it.
(4)The civil action shall be filed in any county in the state in which the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, in the county in which the records relevant to that practice are maintained and administered, or in the county in which the aggrieved person would have resided in the housing accommodation. If the defendant is not found within that county, the action may be filed in the county of the defendants residence or principal office. Any aggrieved person may intervene as a matter of right in the proceeding, and the appeal or other judicial review of that proceeding.
(b)If the department determines that an allegation concerns the legality of any zoning or other land use law or ordinance, the department or the Attorney General shall take appropriate action with respect to the complaint according to the procedures established in this part for other complaints of housing discrimination.
(c)Within one year of the effective date of every final order or decision issued pursuant to this part, the department shall conduct a compliance review to determine whether the order or decision has been fully obeyed and implemented.
(d)Whenever the department has reasonable cause to believe that a respondent has breached a conciliation agreement signed by the department, the department shall initiate a civil action to enforce the agreement.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2024 | In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending. |
| Sep 29, 2024 | Vetoed by the Governor. |
| Sep 3, 2024 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m. |
| Aug 26, 2024 | Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 31. Noes 9. Page 5414.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling. |
| Aug 20, 2024 | In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending. |
| Aug 19, 2024 | Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 51. Noes 16. Page 6374.) Ordered to the Senate. |
| Aug 15, 2024 | Read third time and amended. |
| Aug 15, 2024 | Ordered to third reading. |
| Jul 3, 2024 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Jul 2, 2024 | From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (July 2). |
| Jun 11, 2024 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (June 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| May 28, 2024 | Referred to Com. on JUD. |
| May 22, 2024 | In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk. |
| May 21, 2024 | Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 30. Noes 9. Page 4062.) Ordered to the Assembly. |
| May 16, 2024 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| May 16, 2024 | From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3968.) (May 16). |
| May 10, 2024 | Set for hearing May 16. |
| May 6, 2024 | May 6 hearing: Placed on APPR suspense file. |
| Apr 26, 2024 | Set for hearing May 6. |
| Apr 11, 2024 | Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Apr 10, 2024 | From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 2. Page 3530.) (April 9). |
| Apr 1, 2024 | From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD. |
| Mar 14, 2024 | Set for hearing April 9. |
| Feb 14, 2024 | Referred to Com. on JUD. |
| Feb 7, 2024 | From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 8. |
| Feb 6, 2024 | Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2024 | Unfinished Business SB1022 Skinner et al. Concurrence | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Aug 19, 2024 | SB 1022 Skinner Senate Third Reading By Kalra | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Jul 2, 2024 | Do pass. | Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Jun 11, 2024 | Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary |
Passed |
|
| May 21, 2024 | Senate 3rd Reading SB1022 Skinner et al. | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| May 16, 2024 | Do pass | Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| May 6, 2024 | Placed on suspense file | Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Apr 9, 2024 | Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| Acclamation Insurance Management Services | ** Against | |
| Allied Managed Care | ** Against | |
| APLA Health | ** Support | |
| California Association Of Joint Powers Authorities | ** Against | |
| California Association Of Sheet Metal And Air Conditioning Contractors National Association | ** Against | |
| California Association Of Winegrape Growers | ** Against | |
| California Chamber Of Commerce | ** Against | |
| California Domestic Workers Coalition | ** Support | |
| California Employment Law Council | ** Against | |
| California Employment Lawyers Association | ** Support | |
| California Farm Bureau | ** Against | |
| California Federation of Labor Unions | ** Support | |
| California Financial Services Association | ** Against | |
| California Landscape Contractors Association | ** Against | |
| California League of Food Producers | ** Against | |
| California Legislative LGBTQ Caucus | ** Support | |
| California Retailers Association | ** Against | |
| California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation | ** Support | |
| California State Council for the Society of Human Resources Management | ** Against | |
| California Transcends | ** Support | |
| California Work & Family Coalition | ** Support | |
| Center for Immigrant Protection – the Asylum Project and Parivar Bay Area | ** Support | |
| Central California LGBTQ Collaborative | ** Support | |
| Child Care Law Center | ** Support | |
| Chinese for Affirmative Action | ** Support | |
| Civil Justice Association Of California | ** Against | |
| Coalition of Small and Disabled Veteran Businesses | ** Against | |
| Construction Employers Association | ** Against | |
| Courage California | ** Support | |
| East Bay Sanctuary Covenant | ** Support | |
| El/La Para TransLatinas | ** Support | |
| Equal Rights Advocates | ** Support | |
| Equality California | ** Support | |
| Family Business Association of California | ** Against | |
| Flasher Barricade Association | ** Against | |
| Housing Contractors Of California | ** Against | |
| LA Area Chamber | * Against | Apr 9, 2024 |
| Legal Aid At Work | ** Support | |
| Legal Services for Prisoners with Children/AOUON | ** Support | |
| National Asian Pacific American Families Against Substance Abuse | ** Support | |
| National Council of Jewish Women California | ** Support | |
| National Empowerment Law Project | ** Support | |
| Parent Voices CA | ** Support | |
| Public Counsel | ** Support | |
| Public Risk Innovation Solutions and Management | ** Against | |
| Root & Rebound | ** Support | |
| San Joaquin Pride Center | ** Support | |
| Solano Pride Center | ** Support | |
| TechEquity Collaborative | ** Support | |
| The Transgender District, San Francisco | ** Support | |
| Transfamily Support Services | ** Support | |
| Transgender Health & Wellness Center | ** Support | |
| Transgender Resource, Advocacy and Network Service | ** Support | |
| TransYouth Liberation and TransFamily Support Services | ** Support | |
| Underground Scholars Initiative Student Organization, UC Davis | ** Support | |
| Western Electrical Contractors Association | ** Against | |
| Worksafe | ** Support | |
| Youth Leadership Institute | ** Support |
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | SB 1022 |
VETO
Bill No: SB 1022
Author: Skinner (D), et al.
Enrolled: 8/28/24
Vote: 27
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE: 9-2, 4/9/24
AYES: Umberg, Allen, Ashby, Caballero, Durazo, Laird, Min, Stern, Wahab
NOES: Wilk, Niello
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 5-2, 5/16/24
AYES: Caballero, Ashby, Becker, Bradford, Wahab
NOES: Jones, Seyarto
SENATE FLOOR: 30-9, 5/21/24
AYES: Archuleta, Ashby, Atkins, Becker, Blakespear, Bradford, Caballero, Cortese, Dodd, Durazo, Eggman, Glazer, Gonzalez, Hurtado, Laird, Limón, McGuire, Menjivar, Min, Newman, Padilla, Portantino, Roth, Rubio, Skinner, Smallwood-Cuevas, Stern, Umberg, Wahab, Wiener
NOES: Alvarado-Gil, Dahle, Grove, Jones, Nguyen, Niello, Ochoa Bogh, Seyarto, Wilk
NO VOTE RECORDED: Allen
SENATE FLOOR: 31-9, 8/26/24
AYES: Allen, Archuleta, Ashby, Atkins, Becker, Blakespear, Bradford, Caballero, Cortese, Dodd, Durazo, Eggman, Glazer, Gonzalez, Hurtado, Laird, Limón, McGuire, Menjivar, Min, Newman, Padilla, Portantino, Roth, Rubio, Skinner, Smallwood-Cuevas, Stern, Umberg, Wahab, Wiener
NOES: Alvarado-Gil, Dahle, Grove, Jones, Nguyen, Niello, Ochoa Bogh, Seyarto, Wilk
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 51-16, 8/19/24 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Enforcement of civil rights
SOURCE: Equal Rights Advocates
Equality California
Legal Aid at Work
DIGEST:
This bill provides that the director of the Civil Rights Department (CRD) may file a group or class complaint alleging a violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) within a period of seven years or fewer before the date of the alleged violation, and adds periods during which the CRD’s time frame to issue a right-to-sue notice and an individual’s time frame to sue following the receipt of a right-to-sue notice are tolled.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- Establishes the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). (Government (Gov.) Code, tit. 2, div. 3, pt. 2.8, §§ 12900 et seq.)
- Establishes the Civil Rights Department (CRD) and the Civil Rights Council (Council) within the CRD to effectuate and enforce FEHA, as specified. (Gov. Code, §§ 12901-12907.)
- Makes it an unlawful employment practice in California, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification or, except where based on applicable security regulations established by the United States or this State, for employers and labor organizations to engage in discrimination and other negative employment actions on the basis of the characteristics listed in 2)(a), subject to certain exemptions. (Gov. Code, § 12940.)
- Sets forth procedures for the prevention and elimination of practices made unlawful under 4), including:
- Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged unlawful practice may file a complaint with the CRD, as specified. (Gov. Code, § 12960.)
- Upon receipt of a complaint alleging facts sufficient to constitute a violation of 4), the CRD must make a prompt investigation of the allegations. (Gov. Code, § 12963.)
- If the CRD does not file a civil action within 150 days after the filing of a complaint, or the CRD determines earlier that it will not bring a civil action, the CRD shall promptly notify the person claiming to be aggrieved that the CRD shall issue, on request, a right to sue notice; the CRD must issue the notice upon completion of its investigation, which must be no later than one year after the complaint was filed (or two years, for complaints treated as group or class complaints). (Gov. Code, § 12965(c).)
- Upon receipt of a right to sue notice, an aggrieved person may file a civil action in a superior court. (Gov. Code, § 12965(c).)
- Provides statutes of limitations for actions brought pursuant to 4), and for those time frames to be extended or tolled for certain periods, including a one year statute of limitations for a violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act, a two-year statute of limitations for specified wage violations, and a three-years statute of limitations for specified sexual harassment and FEHA violations; these limitations windows are tolled for specified periods. (Gov. Code, §§ 12960(e), 12965.)
- Authorizes, where an unlawful practice alleged in a verified complaint under 4) that adversely affects a group or class of persons in a similar manner or raises questions of law common to a group or class, the aggrieved individual or the CRD to file the complaint on behalf of and as representative of such group or class. The CRD may investigate a complaint as a group or class complaint. (Gov. Code, § 12961.)
- Establishes procedures for the prevention and elimination of discrimination in housing under FEHA which are generally similar to those for unlawful employment practices, including permitting the Attorney General or the director of the CRD to make, sign, and file complaints citing practices that appear to relate to housing discrimination, as specified. (Gov. Code, § 12980.)
- States that no complaint for housing discrimination under FEHA may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated. (Gov. Code, § 12980(b).)
- Provides that, when CRD brings a housing complaint in the public interest, the civil action shall be filed in any county in the state where the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, in the county in which the records relevant to that practice are maintained or administered, or the county in which the aggrieved person would have resided in the housing accommodation. (Gov. Code, § 12981.)
This bill:
- Defines, within FEHA, “group or class complaint” as including any complaint alleging a pattern or practice; and states that this definition is declarative of, and clarifies, existing law.
- Provides that a complaint filed by the director of CRD, or the director’s authorized representative, or an unlawful employment practices complaint treated by the director or the director’s representative, as a group or class complaint may allege any violation of FEHA that occurred within a period of seven years or fewer before the date the complaint was filed.
- Modifies the time during which an individual’s time frame to bring a FEHA action following the filing of a complaint is tolled, to run until either (a) when CRD files a civil action for the alleged violation, or (b) one year after CRD issues either the written notice that the CRD is not electing to file a lawsuit on behalf of the complainant or, if the complainant timely appeals the CRD’s closure of their complaint, written notice that the complaint remains closed following the appeal. Under the existing language of the statute, the new tolling—during the complainant’s appeal of the CRD’s closure of the case—would apply retroactively.
- Modifies the time during which the director of CRD’s time frame to bring a FEHA civil action following the filing of a complaint is tolled, to include:
- The amount of time specified in any written agreement between CRD and the respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable timeline.
- The length of time for which the CRD’s investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified.
- During a timely appeal with the CRD of the CRD’s closure of the complaint.
- Requires the CRD, if it determines, in its discretion, that an individually filed unlawful employment practice complaint relates in whole or in part to a complaint filed in the name of the director or as a group or class complaint for the purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, to issue a right-to-sue notice either in response to a request from the complainant or after the director’s or group or class complaint has been fully and finally disposed of and all civil actions, appeals, or related proceedings have terminated.
- Modifies the time during which the CRD’s time frame to issue a right-to-sue notice to an individual complainant is tolled, to include:
- The amount of time specified in any written agreement between CRD and the respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable timeline.
- The length of time for which the CRD’s investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified.
- During a timely appeal with the CRD of the CRD’s closure of the complaint.
- Clarifies that no complaint in a housing discrimination action may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated, and removes this term from the subdivision relating to housing discrimination actions filed by the Attorney General or the director of the CRD.
- Eliminates the requirement that the CRD bring a civil action for housing discrimination in a county in the state in which the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, a county in which the relevant records are maintained and administered, a county in which the aggrieved person would have resided in the housing, or a county in which the defendant resides or maintains its principal office.
- Includes double-jointing language to avoid conflicts with SB 1137 (Smallwood-Cuevas, Chapter 779, Statutes of 2024) and AB 1815 (Weber, Chapter 619, Statutes of 2024).
Comments
California’s FEHA establishes the mechanism by which Californians can seek relief from invidious discrimination in employment and housing. The FEHA requires all potential FEHA plaintiffs to file an administrative complaint with the CRD before proceeding to a civil action. The CRD is tasked with conducting an investigation and may opt to proceed with a suit in the name of the plaintiff; if the CRD elects not to sue in the plaintiff’s name, the plaintiff may file a lawsuit against the employer or housing provider. If the CRD determines that an administrative complaint relates to a class or group of similarly situated individuals, the CRD may also elect to proceed with a class or group claim.
This bill makes a number of changes to the provisions governing the FEHA’s administrative timelines. The most significant of these changes permits the CRD to file a group or class civil action alleging violations that date back seven years from the date the initial administrative complaint was filed. The bill also establishes tolling periods during the period in which the CRD must conduct its investigation and issue a right-to-sue notice, and during which a plaintiff has to file suit after receiving a right-to-sue notice, to include tolling during the pendency of an agreement between the CRD and the defendant, during the time when a plaintiff is appealing the CRD’s denial to pursue a claim, and during the pendency of a class action brought by the CRD that relates to the individual claim. These tolling periods are intended to bring greater efficiency to the claims process and avoid the filing of duplicative lawsuits. The bill also makes other changes to clarify the scope of class actions and provisions of the housing portions of FEHA.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No
SUPPORT: (Verified 10/8/24)
Equal Rights Advocates (co-source)
Equality California (co-source)
Legal Aid at Work (co-source)
APLA Health
California Domestic Workers Coalition
California Employment Lawyers Association
California Federation of Labor Unions
California Legislative LGBTQ Caucus
California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
California TRANScends
California Work & Family Coalition
Center for Immigrant Protection – the Asylum Project and Parivar Bay Area
Central California LGBTQ+ Collaborative
Child Care Law Center
Chinese for Affirmative Action
Courage California
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant
El/La Para TransLatinas
Legal Services for Prisoners with Children/AOUON
National Asian Pacific American Families Against Substance Abuse
National Council of Jewish Women California
National Empowerment Law Project
Parent Voices CA
Public Counsel
Root & Rebound
San Joaquin Pride Center
Solano Pride Center
TechEquity Collaborative
TransFamily Support Services
The Transgender District, San Francisco
Transgender Health & Wellness Center
Transgender Resource, Advocacy and Network Service
TransYouth Liberation and TransFamily Support Services
Underground Scholars Initiative Student Organization, UC Davis
Worksafe
Youth Leadership Institute
OPPOSITION: (Verified 10/8/24)
Acclamation Insurance Management Services
Allied Managed Care
California Association of Joint Powers Authorities
California Association of Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors National Association
California Association of Winegrape Growers
California Chamber of Commerce
California Employment Law Council
California Farm Bureau
California Financial Services Association
California Landscape Contractors Association
California League of Food Producers
California Retailers Association
California State Council for the Society of Human Resource Management
Civil Justice Association of California
Coalition of Small and Disabled Veteran Businesses
Construction Employers’ Association
Family Business Association of California
Flasher Barricade Association
Housing Contractors of California
Public Risk Innovation, Solution, and Management
Western Electrical Contractors Association
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: According to Equal Rights Advocates, Equality California, and Legal Aid at Work:
CRD remains limited in its capacity to thoroughly and effectively prosecute systemic discrimination complaints. Although many complaints initiated by CRD, as well as complaints affecting a class or group, involve discriminatory practices that go back years, the department must adhere to the same statute of limitations as an individual claimant–one year. Similarly, CRD must complete their investigations of these claims within one year, despite the reality that information gathering in these investigations, particularly for group/class complaints, takes considerable time. This one-year investigation deadline is inadequate for a thorough investigation of claims, and leads to administrative inefficiency within the department–when individuals file complaints that are already the subject of ongoing CRD group/class investigations, they cannot be easily aggregated into ongoing investigations but rather must complete on their own individual timelines.
SB 1022 would address these concerns by allowing CRD to more fully rectify long-running civil rights violations and provide redress to as many victims as possible by clarifying that certain deadlines applicable to individual complainants do not apply to CRD actions to remedy systemic discrimination. This change would align California law with federal interpretations of the timelines applicable to CRD’s counterpart agency, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)–that it is not subject to Title VII’s deadlines for individual workers. Further, SB 1022 would allow CRD to pause investigations of administrative complaints that may be resolved by actions CRD is already pursuing, so that thorough investigations can occur to resolve the maximum number of claims pertaining to the same discriminatory practices.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: According to the coalition of organizations in opposition to this bill:
Not only do statutes of limitations ensure memories and evidence are fresh, but they also ensure illegal behavior is promptly reported and vanquished. This is why, for most civil claims, the statute of limitations will be between two and five years. For example, most personal injury lawsuits have a two-year statute of limitations. For contract cases, it varies from two-to-four years. For property damage, it is generally three years. For claims against a government entity, claims must be filed within in as little as six months. The default statute of limitations for laws without a specified statute of limitation is three years. See Code of Civil Procedure Sections 312, 338, 345. State entities filing claims are subject to these statutes of limitations as well. See, e.g., People v. Overstock.com, Inc. (2017) 12 Cal. App. 5th 1064, 1076-1078 (applying UCL four-year statute of limitations to case brought by the Attorney General); Code of Civil Procedure Section 345 (“The limitations prescribed in this chapter apply to actions brought in the name of the state or county or for the benefit of the state or county, in the same manner as to actions by private parties.”)
It is unclear why the CRD requires such a significant statute of limitations… The evidence available to confirm or refute a claim will shrink. Memories will fade. Former employees will change jobs, retire, or, in some cases, pass on. The very methods by which we maintain data may become inaccessible or unavailable. As the available information about an event shrinks the claim becomes harder to defend. The defendant will be forced to assess what is the better option – pay the expensive attorney’s fees to litigate a claim where a plaintiff claims perfect memory and no other witnesses or evidence remains … or just pay the plaintiff a settlement because defending the claim without evidence would be impossible.
GOVERNOR'S VETO MESSAGE:
This bill would clarify a number of unsettled procedural matters involving the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA).
I thank the author for introducing this measure, which intends to limit litigation and help resolve civil rights disputes quickly and more efficiently. However, I am concerned with specific provisions in this bill that provide the Civil Rights Department (CRD) with a seven-year period to file a group or class complaint under FEHA. This limitations period is significantly longer than the limitations period for similar civil matters, including class action litigation on behalf of employees.
For this reason, I cannot sign this bill.
However, I encourage the Legislature to pursue legislation next year that enacts the other changes that this bill would make, together with a more reasonable period for CRD to initiate a group or class complaint.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 51-16, 8/19/24
AYES: Addis, Aguiar-Curry, Alvarez, Arambula, Bauer-Kahan, Bennett, Berman, Boerner, Bonta, Bryan, Calderon, Juan Carrillo, Wendy Carrillo, Cervantes, Connolly, Mike Fong, Friedman, Gabriel, Garcia, Gipson, Grayson, Haney, Hart, Holden, Irwin, Jackson, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Lee, Low, Lowenthal, Maienschein, McCarty, McKinnor, Muratsuchi, Pellerin, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Luz Rivas, Santiago, Schiavo, Ting, Villapudua, Ward, Weber, Wicks, Wilson, Wood, Zbur, Robert Rivas
NOES: Alanis, Megan Dahle, Davies, Dixon, Essayli, Flora, Gallagher, Hoover, Lackey, Mathis, Jim Patterson, Joe Patterson, Sanchez, Ta, Waldron, Wallis
NO VOTE RECORDED: Bains, Chen, Stephanie Nguyen, Ortega, Pacheco, Papan, Ramos, Reyes, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Soria, Valencia
Prepared by: Allison Whitt Meredith / JUD. / (916) 651-4113
10/10/24 10:12:03
**** END ****
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | SB 1022 |
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Bill No: SB 1022
Author: Skinner (D), et al.
Amended: 8/15/24
Vote: 21
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE: 9-2, 4/9/24
AYES: Umberg, Allen, Ashby, Caballero, Durazo, Laird, Min, Stern, Wahab
NOES: Wilk, Niello
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 5-2, 5/16/24
AYES: Caballero, Ashby, Becker, Bradford, Wahab
NOES: Jones, Seyarto
SENATE FLOOR: 30-9, 5/21/24
AYES: Archuleta, Ashby, Atkins, Becker, Blakespear, Bradford, Caballero, Cortese, Dodd, Durazo, Eggman, Glazer, Gonzalez, Hurtado, Laird, Limón, McGuire, Menjivar, Min, Newman, Padilla, Portantino, Roth, Rubio, Skinner, Smallwood-Cuevas, Stern, Umberg, Wahab, Wiener
NOES: Alvarado-Gil, Dahle, Grove, Jones, Nguyen, Niello, Ochoa Bogh, Seyarto, Wilk
NO VOTE RECORDED: Allen
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 51-16, 8/19/24 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Enforcement of civil rights
SOURCE: Equal Rights Advocates
Equality California
Legal Aid at Work
DIGEST:
This bill provides that the director of the Civil Rights Department (CRD) may file a group or class complaint alleging a violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) within a period of 7 years or fewer before the date of the alleged violation, and adds periods during which the CRD’s time frame to issue a right-to-sue notice and an individual’s time frame to sue following the receipt of a right-to-sue notice are tolled.
Assembly Amendments
add language to avoid chaptering conflicts with SB 1137 (Smallwood-Cuevas) and AB 1815 (Weber).
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- Establishes the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). (Gov. Code, tit. 2, div. 3, pt. 2.8, §§ 12900 et seq.)
- Establishes the Civil Rights Department (CRD) and the Civil Rights Council (Council) within the CRD to effectuate and enforce FEHA, as specified. (Gov. Code, §§ 12901-12907.)
- Makes it an unlawful employment practice in California, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification or, except where based on applicable security regulations established by the United States or this State, for employers and labor organizations to engage in discrimination and other negative employment actions on the basis of the characteristics listed in 2)(a), subject to certain exemptions. (Gov. Code, § 12940.)
- Sets forth procedures for the prevention and elimination of practices made unlawful under 4), including:
- Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged unlawful practice may file a complaint with the CRD, as specified. (Gov. Code, § 12960.)
- Upon receipt of a complaint alleging facts sufficient to constitute a violation of 4), the CRD must make a prompt investigation of the allegations. (Gov. Code, § 12963.)
- If the CRD does not file a civil action within 150 days after the filing of a complaint, or the CRD determines earlier that it will not bring a civil action, the CRD shall promptly notify the person claiming to be aggrieved that the CRD shall issue, on request, a right to sue notice; the CRD must issue the notice upon completion of its investigation, which must be no later than one year after the complaint was filed (or two years, for complaints treated as group or class complaints). (Gov. Code, § 12965(c).)
- Upon receipt of a right to sue notice, an aggrieved person may file a civil action in a superior court. (Gov. Code, § 12965(c).)
- Provides statutes of limitations for actions brought pursuant to 4), and for those time frames to be extended or tolled for certain periods, including a one year statute of limitations for a violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act, a two-year statute of limitations for specified wage violations, and a three-years statute of limitations for specified sexual harassment and FEHA violations; these limitations windows are tolled for specified periods. (Gov. Code, §§ 12960(e), 12965.)
- Authorizes, where an unlawful practice alleged in a verified complaint under 4) that adversely affects a group or class of persons in a similar manner or raises questions of law common to a group or class, the aggrieved individual or the CRD to file the complaint on behalf of and as representative of such group or class. The CRD may investigate a complaint as a group or class complaint. (Gov. Code, § 12961.)
- Establishes procedures for the prevention and elimination of discrimination in housing under FEHA which are generally similar to those for unlawful employment practices, including permitting the Attorney General or the director of the CRD to make, sign, and file complaints citing practices that appear to relate to housing discrimination, as specified. (Gov. Code, § 12980.)
- States that no complaint for housing discrimination under FEHA may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated. (Gov. Code, § 12980(b).)
- Provides that, when CRD brings a housing complaint in the public interest, the civil action shall be filed in any county in the state where the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, in the county in which the records relevant to that practice are maintained or administered, or the county in which the aggrieved person would have resided in the housing accommodation. (Gov. Code, § 12981.)
This bill:
- Defines, within FEHA, “group or class complaint” as including any complaint alleging a pattern or practice; and states that this definition is declarative of, and clarifies, existing law.
- Provides that a complaint filed by the director of CRD, or the director’s authorized representative, or an unlawful employment practices complaint treated by the director or the director’s representative, as a group or class complaint may allege any violation of FEHA that occurred within a period of seven years or fewer before the date the complaint was filed.
- Modifies the time during which an individual’s time frame to bring a FEHA action following the filing of a complaint is tolled, to run until either (1) when CRD files a civil action for the alleged violation, or (2) one year after CRD issues either the written notice that the CRD is not electing to file a lawsuit on behalf of the complainant or, if the complainant timely appeals the CRD’s closure of their complaint, written notice that the complaint remains closed following the appeal. Under the existing language of the statute, the new tolling—during the complainant’s appeal of the CRD’s closure of the case—would apply retroactively.
- Modifies the time during which the director of CRD’s time frame to bring a FEHA civil action following the filing of a complaint is tolled, to include:
- The amount of time specified in any written agreement between CRD and the respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable timeline.
- The length of time for which the CRD’s investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified.
- During a timely appeal with the CRD of the CRD’s closure of the complaint.
- Requires the CRD, if it determines, in its discretion, that an individually filed unlawful employment practice complaint relates in whole or in part to a complaint filed in the name of the director or as a group or class complaint for the purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, to issue a right-to-sue notice either in response to a request from the complainant or after the director’s or group or class complaint has been fully and finally disposed of and all civil actions, appeals, or related proceedings have terminated.
- Modifies the time during which the CRD’s time frame to issue a right-to-sue notice to an individual complainant is tolled, to include:
- The amount of time specified in any written agreement between CRD and the respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable timeline.
- The length of time for which the CRD’s investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified.
- During a timely appeal with the CRD of the CRD’s closure of the complaint.
- Clarifies that no complaint in a housing discrimination action may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated, and removes this term from the subdivision relating to housing discrimination actions filed by the Attorney General or the director of the CRD.
- Eliminates the requirement that the CRD bring a civil action for housing discrimination in a county in the state in which the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, a county in which the relevant records are maintained and administered, a county in which the aggrieved person would have resided in the housing, or a county in which the defendant resides or maintains its principal office.
- Includes double-jointing language to avoid conflicts with SB 1137 (Smallwood-Cuevas) and AB 1815 (Weber).
Comments
California’s FEHA establishes the mechanism by which Californians can seek relief from invidious discrimination in employment and housing. The FEHA requires all potential FEHA plaintiffs to file an administrative complaint with the CRD before proceeding to a civil action. The CRD is tasked with conducting an investigation and may opt to proceed with a suit in the name of the plaintiff; if the CRD elects not to sue in the plaintiff’s name, the plaintiff may file a lawsuit against the employer or housing provider. If the CRD determines that an administrative complaint relates to a class or group of similarly situated individuals, the CRD may also elect to proceed with a class or group claim.
This bill makes a number of changes to the provisions governing the FEHA’s administrative timelines. The most significant of these changes permits the CRD to file a group or class civil action alleging violations that date back seven years from the date the initial administrative complaint was filed. The bill also establishes tolling periods during the period in which the CRD must conduct its investigation and issue a right-to-sue notice, and during which a plaintiff has to file suit after receiving a right-to-sue notice, to include tolling during the pendency of an agreement between the CRD and the defendant, during the time when a plaintiff is appealing the CRD’s denial to pursue a claim, and during the pendency of a class action brought by the CRD that relates to the individual claim. These tolling periods are intended to bring greater efficiency to the claims process and avoid the filing of duplicative lawsuits. The bill also makes other changes to clarify the scope of class actions and provisions of the housing portions of FEHA.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No
According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, the fiscal impact of the bill is as follows:
No significant state costs. CRD reports no impact or possible cost savings, since these changes may make it easier to handle multiple discrimination complaints in one group action rather than filing individual actions. Courts may experience minor cost savings for the same reason.
SUPPORT: (Verified 8/19/24)
Equal Rights Advocates (co-source)
Equality California (co-source)
Legal Aid at Work (co-source)
APLA Health
California Domestic Workers Coalition
California Employment Lawyers Association
California Federation of Labor Unions
California Legislative LGBTQ Caucus
California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
California TRANScends
California Work & Family Coalition
Center for Immigrant Protection – the Asylum Project and Parivar Bay Area
Central California LGBTQ+ Collaborative
Child Care Law Center
Chinese for Affirmative Action
Courage California
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant
El/La Para TransLatinas
Legal Services for Prisoners with Children/AOUON
National Asian Pacific American Families Against Substance Abuse
National Council of Jewish Women California
National Empowerment Law Project
Parent Voices CA
Public Counsel
Root & Rebound
San Joaquin Pride Center
Solano Pride Center
TechEquity Collaborative
TransFamily Support Services
The Transgender District, San Francisco
Transgender Health & Wellness Center
Transgender Resource, Advocacy and Network Service
TransYouth Liberation and TransFamily Support Services
Underground Scholars Initiative Student Organization, UC Davis
Worksafe
Youth Leadership Institute
OPPOSITION: (Verified 8/19/24)
Acclamation Insurance Management Services
Allied Managed Care
California Association of Joint Powers Authorities
California Association of Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors National Association
California Association of Winegrape Growers
California Chamber of Commerce
California Employment Law Council
California Farm Bureau
California Financial Services Association
California Landscape Contractors Association
California League of Food Producers
California Retailers Association
California State Council for the Society of Human Resource Management
Civil Justice Association of California
Coalition of Small and Disabled Veteran Businesses
Construction Employers’ Association
Family Business Association of California
Flasher Barricade Association
Housing Contractors of California
Public Risk Innovation, Solution, and Management
Western Electrical Contractors Association
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: According to Equal Rights Advocates, Equality California, and Legal Aid at Work:
CRD remains limited in its capacity to thoroughly and effectively prosecute systemic discrimination complaints. Although many complaints initiated by CRD, as well as complaints affecting a class or group, involve discriminatory practices that go back years, the department must adhere to the same statute of limitations as an individual claimant–one year. Similarly, CRD must complete their investigations of these claims within one year, despite the reality that information gathering in these investigations, particularly for group/class complaints, takes considerable time. This one-year investigation deadline is inadequate for a thorough investigation of claims, and leads to administrative inefficiency within the department–when individuals file complaints that are already the subject of ongoing CRD group/class investigations, they cannot be easily aggregated into ongoing investigations but rather must complete on their own individual timelines.
SB 1022 would address these concerns by allowing CRD to more fully rectify long-running civil rights violations and provide redress to as many victims as possible by clarifying that certain deadlines applicable to individual complainants do not apply to CRD actions to remedy systemic discrimination. This change would align California law with federal interpretations of the timelines applicable to CRD’s counterpart agency, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)–that it is not subject to Title VII’s deadlines for individual workers. Further, SB 1022 would allow CRD to pause investigations of administrative complaints that may be resolved by actions CRD is already pursuing, so that thorough investigations can occur to resolve the maximum number of claims pertaining to the same discriminatory practices
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: According to the coalition of organizations in opposition:
Not only do statutes of limitations ensure memories and evidence are fresh, but they also ensure illegal behavior is promptly reported and vanquished. This is why, for most civil claims, the statute of limitations will be between two and five years. For example, most personal injury lawsuits have a two-year statute of limitations. For contract cases, it varies from two-to-four years. For property damage, it is generally three years. For claims against a government entity, claims must be filed within in as little as six months. The default statute of limitations for laws without a specified statute of limitation is three years. See Code of Civil Procedure Sections 312, 338, 345. State entities filing claims are subject to these statutes of limitations as well. See, e.g., People v. Overstock.com, Inc. (2017) 12 Cal. App. 5th 1064, 1076-1078 (applying UCL four-year statute of limitations to case brought by the Attorney General); Code of Civil Procedure Section 345 (“The limitations prescribed in this chapter apply to actions brought in the name of the state or county or for the benefit of the state or county, in the same manner as to actions by private parties.”)
It is unclear why the CRD requires such a significant statute of limitations… The evidence available to confirm or refute a claim will shrink. Memories will fade. Former employees will change jobs, retire, or, in some cases, pass on. The very methods by which we maintain data may become inaccessible or unavailable. As the available information about an event shrinks the claim becomes harder to defend. The defendant will be forced to assess what is the better option – pay the expensive attorney’s fees to litigate a claim where a plaintiff claims perfect memory and no other witnesses or evidence remains … or just pay the plaintiff a settlement because defending the claim without evidence would be impossible.Click or tap here to enter text.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 51-16, 8/19/24
AYES: Addis, Aguiar-Curry, Alvarez, Arambula, Bauer-Kahan, Bennett, Berman, Boerner, Bonta, Bryan, Calderon, Juan Carrillo, Wendy Carrillo, Cervantes, Connolly, Mike Fong, Friedman, Gabriel, Garcia, Gipson, Grayson, Haney, Hart, Holden, Irwin, Jackson, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Lee, Low, Lowenthal, Maienschein, McCarty, McKinnor, Muratsuchi, Pellerin, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Luz Rivas, Santiago, Schiavo, Ting, Villapudua, Ward, Weber, Wicks, Wilson, Wood, Zbur, Robert Rivas
NOES: Alanis, Megan Dahle, Davies, Dixon, Essayli, Flora, Gallagher, Hoover, Lackey, Mathis, Jim Patterson, Joe Patterson, Sanchez, Ta, Waldron, Wallis
NO VOTE RECORDED: Bains, Chen, Stephanie Nguyen, Ortega, Pacheco, Papan, Ramos, Reyes, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Soria, Valencia
Prepared by: Allison Whitt Meredith / JUD. / (916) 651-4113
8/20/24 16:11:18
**** END ****
SENATE THIRD READING
STR Bill Id:SB 1022
Author:(Skinner)
As Amended Ver:August 15, 2024
Majority vote
SUMMARY
Modifies and expands the timelines for the Department to issue right to sue notices as well as the timelines for filing various civil actions related to violations of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA).
Major Provisions
- Provides that a complaint filed by the Department that is treated as a group or class complaint may be filed within seven years of the date in which the original complaint was filed with the Department.
- Modifies the time during which an individual's statute of limitations for filing an action pursuant to the FEHA is tolled to be either:
- When the Department files a civil action based on the alleged violation; or
- One year after the Department issues either the written notice that the Department is not electing to file a lawsuit on behalf of the complainant or, if the complainant timely appeals the Department's closure of their complaint, written notice that the complaint remains closed following the appeal, as specified.
- Modifies the time during which the Department's statute of limitations to bring an action pursuant to the FEHA is tolled to include:
- The amount of time specified in any written agreement between the Department and the respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable timeline;
- The length of time for which the Department investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified; and
- During a timely appeal of the Department's decision to close a complaint.
- Requires the Department, if it determines, in its discretion, that an individually filed unlawful employment practice complaint relates in whole or in part to a complaint filed in the name of the director or as a group or class complaint for the purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, to issue a right-to-sue notice either in response to a request from the complainant or after the director's or group or class complaint has been fully and finally disposed of and all civil actions, appeals, or related proceedings have terminated.
- Modifies the time during which the Department deadline to issue a right to sue notice to an individual is tolled to include:
- The amount of time specified in any written agreement between the Department and the respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable timeline;
- The length of time the Department's investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified; and
- During a timely appeal of the Department's decision to close a complaint.
- Clarifies that no complaint in a housing discrimination action may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated, and removes this term from the provisions of existing law relating to housing discrimination actions filed by the Attorney General or the Department.
- Eliminates the requirement that the Department bring a civil action for housing discrimination in a county in the state in which the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, a county in which the relevant records are maintained and administered, a county in which the aggrieved person would have resided in the housing, or a county in which the defendant resides or maintains its principal office.
- Defines, within the FEHA, "group or class complaint" to include any complaint alleging a pattern or practice. Provides that this definition is declaratory of existing law.
- Resolves chaptering conflicts with SB 1137 (Smallwood-Cuevas) and AB 1815 (Weber).
COMMENTS
The Civil Rights Department (Department) is California's lead governmental agency for the enforcement of the state's civil rights laws. The existing law generally enables aggrieved persons to file complaints with the Department, which then investigates the issues and can either file a lawsuit on the aggrieved party's behalf, or authorize the complainant to file their own individual lawsuit. As a result of the potentially lengthy investigative process and internal dispute resolution tools utilized by the Department, a complex web of statutes of limitations, as well as tolling statutes, govern when cases must be filed in order to enforce the state's civil rights laws. Seeking to ensure that these chronic violations of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) can be properly prosecuted, this bill would extend the statute of limitations for filing group class complaints to seven years, and extend various other deadlines utilized by the Department to prosecute complaints.
Unlike most state laws, most claims arising under FEHA cannot be immediately litigated by a complainant in court. Instead, a complaint must first be filed with the Department, which then investigates the matter. The Department then has between 150 days and two years, depending on the nature of the underlying complaint, to file a civil action on behalf of the complainant or to issue a right to sue notice to the complaint, permitting them to file a civil action in their own capacity. Throughout the investigative process, existing law also provides for various administrative avenues that the Department can utilize to mediate disputes, including utilizing the mediation services of the Department's Community Conflict Resolution Unit and the Dispute Resolution Division.
In the event that a mediated solution cannot be reached by the parties, a lawsuit may be filed. The Department generally is authorized to file a lawsuit within the next one to three years, depending on the nature of the underlying complaint. Individual complainants, on the other hand, must file their lawsuit within one year of receiving a right to sue notice from the Department. To ensure that statutes of limitations do not expire during the pendency of the Department's investigation or attempts at mediation, the existing law provides for the tolling of the applicable statute of limitation while these processes play out.
In addition to filing civil actions on behalf of aggrieved individuals, existing law authorizes the Department to file actions on behalf of classes of similarly situated persons, whether or not they lodged a complaint with the Department. Typically, these quasi-class action suits occur as a result of a "pattern or practice" violation in which the alleged perpetrator has committed the same offense against multiple individuals over a prolonged period of time. One such example arose in 2021, when the Department filed a lawsuit against Activision Blizzard for unlawful employment practices related to sex discrimination. The Department alleged that female employees were frequently paid less than their male counterparts and subjected to repeated instances of sexual harassment over the course of a decade. (Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., First Amended Complaint (Aug. 23, 2021), Case No. 21STCV26571.) Similarly, in 2022, the Department filed suit against Tesla for ongoing race-based harassment of black employees dating back to 2012. (Department of Fair Housing and Employment v. Tesla, Inc., Complaint (Feb. 9, 2022), Case No. 22CV006830.)
In response to the Department's lawsuits, both Activision Blizzard and Tesla argued to the court that the Department is subject to the same administrative statute of limitations as an individual plaintiff granted a right to sue notice. In both cases the court agreed with the defendants and limited the Department's enforcement authority to only those matters occurring within the one-year statute of limitations, thus preventing the Department from litigating the full decade-long malfeasance. (California Civil Rights Department v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., Order on Consent Decree (Jan. 17, 2024), Case No. 21STCV26571, Department of Fair Housing and Employment v. Tesla, Inc., Order re: Ruling on Submitted Matter (Nov. 18, 2022), Case No. 22CV006830.) The legal precedent established in these decisions is now severely limiting the Department's ability to seek redress for years-long violations of the state's civil rights laws.
Seeking to ensure that the Activision Blizzard and Tesla decisions do not needlessly hamstring California's civil rights enforcement authority, this bill would expressly create a seven-year statute of limitations for the Department to file suits on behalf of similarly situated classes of plaintiffs. The author and proponents of this measure note that while the shorter statute of limitations is appropriate for individualized harm, pattern or practice violations can occur for years before the pattern of wrongdoing comes to light. The proponents of this measure contend that a longer look-back period is appropriate for a state regulator that is tasked with preventing workplace and housing discrimination. In opposition to this measure, a coalition of business and tort reform organizations argue that a seven-year statute of limitations is too long. The opposition coalition notes, "Statutes of limitations exist for a simple purpose – to ensure that claims are brought while evidence exists. Both plaintiffs and defendants rely on evidence in proving their case. And both parties lose evidence as time passes."
The opposition is correct in noting that a seven-year statute of limitations is longer than many provisions in California law. The opposition is also correct in noting that most civil actions must be filed between two and five years after the offending act occurs. However, most civil statutes of limitations are for individual plaintiffs. They are not necessarily designed to handle patterns or practices of malfeasance that impact numerous potential plaintiffs and pervade organizations. It should be noted that this bill does not impact the individual plaintiff statues of limitations under the FEHA. Because individualized actions are more fact-specific than pattern or practice claims, this is appropriate. For example, a witness may need to remember a specific instance in which a plaintiff was sexually harassed. This memory is likely to become less reliable over time; thus this bill retains one to three year statute of limitation for individual claims. Conversely, it is wholly conceivable that a witness could remember general instances of sexual harassment that repeatedly occurred over multiple years for a longer period of time. Given that the specific details of a specific instance may not be necessary to demonstrate a pattern or practice of unlawful behavior, specific witness recollections (the type that fade over time) may not be as important in these cases. Thus, the longer statute of limitations for group-based claims brought by the Department seems to be both practical, appropriate, and wholly in line with the purpose of statutes of limitation.
Recognizing the unique nature of the processes utilized by the Department, whereby the Department investigates a claim, potentially seeks mediation, and then opts to file a case or defer the litigation to the original complainant, the existing law provides for the tolling of various statutes of limitations and other deadlines in order to permit these processes to play out in a reasonable manner. This measure adds several new tolling provisions consistent with the spirit of existing law. First, the bill tolls the complainant's one-year window to file a civil action following the issuance of a right-to-sue notice for the duration of a claimant's timely appeal of the Department's decision to close the case. Under the current set of guidelines, even if an appeal were successful, the Department would not be able to proceed with a suit on behalf of the complainant—the combination of the investigation time limit and the filing time limit would prohibit the Department from pursuing the action in court. Secondly, the bill extends the administrative deadlines for the Department to investigate claims to account for any additional time specified in written agreements between the Department and respondents, additional time necessary to adjudicate petitions to compel information and documents, and appeals of the Department's decision to close complaints.
Additionally, the bill permits the Department to delay issuing a right to sue notice when the Department determines that a complaint is related to an ongoing complaint filed by the Department as a group or class complaint for purposes of an investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action. This provision enables the Department to issue a right to sue notice after 150 days to a complainant who requests the notice while not requiring the Department to do so when the issue is still being adjudicated as a part of a broader group or class based action. This provision is intended to avoid duplicative litigation while a class claim is pending. Finally, this makes several technical and conforming changes to the procedural provisions of FEHA.
According to the Author
The California Civil Rights Department ("CRD") is the institutional centerpiece of California's defense against discrimination, harassment, and other civil rights violations. Each year, CRD serves the public interest by investigating thousands of complaints of civil rights violations, mediating and settling many of those complaints, and prosecuting high-impact civil actions for the purpose of protecting the rights of a large number of Californians.
SB 1022 would clarify the law that allows CRD to effectively investigate and prosecute violations of Californians' civil rights.
Stopping workplace discrimination based on race, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, and other characteristics protected under the Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA") should be a priority of the state of California. SB 1022 empowers CRD to stop systemic discriminatory practices and provide justice to working people who have been victims of systemic discrimination.
Arguments in Support
This bill is co-sponsored by Legal Aid at Work, Equality California, and Equal Rights Advocates and is supported by a broad range of civil rights and labor organizations. In support of the bill, the co-sponsors jointly write:
Based on our experiences working closely with clients and the CRD, we know firsthand how impactful the prosecutorial arm of the agency can be in achieving meaningful results for claimants. The ability of the Department to address and correct discriminatory policy and practice at large employers, for example, as well as the ability to deliver relief to groups of harmed workers, without the formal constraints of civil class actions, are incredibly important tools. Just last year, CRD reached a $54 million settlement for workers suffering gender discrimination and equal pay violations at a Santa Monica video game company, which will provide relief to women who were employees or contract workers in
California between October 12, 2015 and December 31, 2020.1 CRD settlements also help prevent future discrimination and harassment by including programmatic relief measures for respondents to take going forward to ensure compliance with California civil rights laws.
However, CRD remains limited in its capacity to thoroughly and effectively prosecute systemic discrimination complaints. Although many complaints affecting a class or group, involve discriminatory practices that go back years, the department must adhere to the same statute of limitations as an individual claimant – one year. CRD must also complete their investigations of these claims within one year, despite the reality that information gathering in these investigations, particularly for group/class complaints, takes considerable time. This one-year investigation deadline is inadequate for a thorough investigation of claims, and leads to administrative inefficiency within the department – when individuals file complaints that are already the subject of ongoing CRD group/class investigations, they cannot be easily aggregated into ongoing investigations but rather must be completed on their own individual one-year timeline.
SB 1022 would address these concerns by allowing CRD to more fully rectify long-running civil rights violations and provide redress to as many victims as possible by clarifying that certain deadlines applicable to individual complainants do not apply to CRD actions to remedy systemic discrimination. This change would better align California law with federal interpretations of the timelines applicable to CRD's counterpart agency, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) – that the agency is not subject to Title VII's deadlines for individual workers.
Further, SB 1022 would allow CRD to hold in abeyance investigations of administrative complaints that may be resolved by actions CRD is already pursuing, so that thorough investigations can occur to resolve the maximum number of claims pertaining to the same discriminatory practices. This ensures that the Department can more efficiently use its limited resources to effectively enforce our civil rights laws in the case of broad, systemic violations, resolving the maximum number of claims pertaining to the same underlying discriminatory practices. In addition to preserving Department resources, this will also be beneficial to the respondents who already responding to investigations or litigation by the Department because they will not have to respond to related individual complaints during the time that they are held in abeyance.
SB 1022 is an important measure to ensure CRD has a robust ability to represent the interests of the state in enforcing California’s public policy to safeguard the rights and opportunities of all persons and protect against unlawful discrimination and other civil rights violations. For many low-wage workers, the CRD offers the single realistic remedy to address discriminatory housing and employment practices and for this reason, it is crucial that the Department have the ability to thoroughly and effectively prosecute violations of the law.
Arguments in Opposition
As stated this measure is opposed by a coalition of business and tort reform advocates including the California Chamber of Commerce, the Civil Justice Association of California, and California Retailers Association. A coalition letter submitted by the opponents of the measure states:
To put it simply: statutes of limitations require cases to be brought while the evidence is relatively fresh to ensure that our judicial system has the evidence to properly assess claims and come to the correct verdict.
Not only do statutes of limitations ensure memories and evidence are fresh, but they also ensure illegal behavior is promptly reported and vanquished. This is why, for most civil claims, the statute of limitations will be between two and five years. For example, most personal injury lawsuits have a two-year statute of limitations. For contract cases, it varies from two-to-four years. For property damage, it is generally three years. For claims against a government entity, claims must be filed within in as little as six months. The default statute of limitations for laws without a specified statute of limitation is three years. See Code of Civil Procedure Sections 312, 338, 345. State entities filing claims are subject to these statutes of limitations as well. See, e.g., People v. Overstock.com, Inc. (2017) 12 Cal. App. 5th 1064, 1076-1078 (applying UCL four-year statute of limitations to case brought by the Attorney General); Code of Civil Procedure Section 345 ("The limitations prescribed in this chapter apply to actions brought in the name of the state or county or for the benefit of the state or county, in the same manner as to actions by private parties.")
It is unclear why the CRD requires such a significant statute of limitations. For example, this proposed statute of limitations is more than twice the statute of limitations presently afforded to an individual employee or CRD to bring an action for an alleged unlawful employment practice.3 Further, because CRD is allowed to investigate a group or class claim for two years prior to filing a lawsuit, by the time the lawsuit even begins it will have been nine years since the start of the limitations period (or longer if the investigatory period is extended).
SB 1022 undermines the very purpose of a statute of limitations. The evidence available to confirm or refute a claim will shrink. Memories will fade. Former employees will change jobs, retire, or, in some cases, pass on. The very methods by which we maintain data may become inaccessible or unavailable. As the available information about an event shrinks the claim becomes harder to defend. The defendant will be forced to assess what is the better option – pay the expensive attorney's fees to litigate a claim where a plaintiff claims perfect memory and no other witnesses or evidence remains … or just pay the plaintiff a settlement because defending the claim without evidence would be impossible.
FISCAL COMMENTS
According to the Assembly Appropriations analysis, no significant state costs. CRD reports no impact or possible cost savings, since these changes may make it easier to handle multiple discrimination complaints in one group action rather than filing individual actions. Courts may experience minor cost savings for the same reason.
VOTES
SENATE FLOOR: 30-9-1
YES: Archuleta, Ashby, Atkins, Becker, Blakespear, Bradford, Caballero, Cortese, Dodd, Durazo, Eggman, Glazer, Gonzalez, Hurtado, Laird, Limón, McGuire, Menjivar, Min, Newman, Padilla, Portantino, Roth, Rubio, Skinner, Smallwood-Cuevas, Stern, Umberg, Wahab, Wiener
NO: Alvarado-Gil, Dahle, Grove, Jones, Nguyen, Niello, Ochoa Bogh, Seyarto, Wilk
ABS, ABST OR NV: Allen
ASM JUDICIARY: 9-3-0
YES: Kalra, Bauer-Kahan, Bryan, Connolly, Haney, Maienschein, McKinnor, Pacheco, Reyes
NO: Dixon, Joe Patterson, Sanchez
ASM APPROPRIATIONS: 11-4-0
YES: Wicks, Arambula, Bryan, Calderon, Wendy Carrillo, Mike Fong, Grayson, Haney, Hart, Pellerin, Villapudua
NO: Sanchez, Dixon, Jim Patterson, Ta
UPDATED
VERSION: August 15, 2024
CONSULTANT: Nicholas Liedtke / JUD. / (916) 319-2334 FN: 0003891
SENATE THIRD READING
STR Bill Id:SB 1022
Author:(Skinner)
As Amended Ver:April 11, 2024
Majority vote
SUMMARY
Modifies and expands the timelines for the Department to issue right to sue notices as well as the timelines for filing various civil actions related to violations of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA).
Major Provisions
- Provides that a complaint filed by the Department that is treated as a group or class complaint may be filed within seven years of the date in which the original complaint was filed with the Department.
- Modifies the time during which an individual's statute of limitations for filing an action pursuant to the FEHA is tolled to be either:
- When the Department files a civil action based on the alleged violation; or
- One year after the Department issues either the written notice that the Department is not electing to file a lawsuit on behalf of the complainant or, if the complainant timely appeals the Department's closure of their complaint, written notice that the complaint remains closed following the appeal, as specified.
- Modifies the time during which the Department's statute of limitations to bring an action pursuant to the FEHA is tolled to include:
- The amount of time specified in any written agreement between the Department and the respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable timeline;
- The length of time for which the Department investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified; and
- During a timely appeal of the Department's decision to close a complaint.
- Requires the Department, if it determines, in its discretion, that an individually filed unlawful employment practice complaint relates in whole or in part to a complaint filed in the name of the director or as a group or class complaint for the purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, to issue a right-to-sue notice either in response to a request from the complainant or after the director's or group or class complaint has been fully and finally disposed of and all civil actions, appeals, or related proceedings have terminated.
- Modifies the time during which the Department deadline to issue a right to sue notice to an individual is tolled to include:
- The amount of time specified in any written agreement between the Department and the respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable timeline;
- The length of time the Department's investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified; and
- During a timely appeal of the Department's decision to close a complaint.
- Clarifies that no complaint in a housing discrimination action may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated, and removes this term from the provisions of existing law relating to housing discrimination actions filed by the Attorney General or the Department.
- Eliminates the requirement that the Department bring a civil action for housing discrimination in a county in the state in which the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, a county in which the relevant records are maintained and administered, a county in which the aggrieved person would have resided in the housing, or a county in which the defendant resides or maintains its principal office.
- Defines, within the FEHA, "group or class complaint" to include any complaint alleging a pattern or practice. Provides that this definition is declaratory of existing law.
COMMENTS
The Civil Rights Department (Department) is California's lead governmental agency for the enforcement of the state's civil rights laws. The existing law generally enables aggrieved persons to file complaints with the Department, which then investigates the issues and can either file a lawsuit on the aggrieved party's behalf, or authorize the complainant to file their own individual lawsuit. As a result of the potentially lengthy investigative process and internal dispute resolution tools utilized by the Department, a complex web of statutes of limitations, as well as tolling statutes, govern when cases must be filed in order to enforce the state's civil rights laws. Seeking to ensure that these chronic violations of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) can be properly prosecuted, this bill would extend the statute of limitations for filing group class complaints to seven years, and extend various other deadlines utilized by the Department to prosecute complaints.
Unlike most state laws, most claims arising under FEHA cannot be immediately litigated by a complainant in court. Instead, a complaint must first be filed with the Department, which then investigates the matter. The Department then has between 150 days and two years, depending on the nature of the underlying complaint, to file a civil action on behalf of the complainant or to issue a right to sue notice to the complaint, permitting them to file a civil action in their own capacity. Throughout the investigative process, existing law also provides for various administrative avenues that the Department can utilize to mediate disputes, including utilizing the mediation services of the Department's Community Conflict Resolution Unit and the Dispute Resolution Division.
In the event that a mediated solution cannot be reached by the parties, a lawsuit may be filed. The Department generally is authorized to file a lawsuit within the next one to three years, depending on the nature of the underlying complaint. Individual complainants, on the other hand, must file their lawsuit within one year of receiving a right to sue notice from the Department. To ensure that statutes of limitations do not expire during the pendency of the Department's investigation or attempts at mediation, the existing law provides for the tolling of the applicable statute of limitation while these processes play out.
In addition to filing civil actions on behalf of aggrieved individuals, existing law authorizes the Department to file actions on behalf of classes of similarly situated persons, whether or not they lodged a complaint with the Department. Typically, these quasi-class action suits occur as a result of a "pattern or practice" violation in which the alleged perpetrator has committed the same offense against multiple individuals over a prolonged period of time. One such example arose in 2021, when the Department filed a lawsuit against Activision Blizzard for unlawful employment practices related to sex discrimination. The Department alleged that female employees were frequently paid less than their male counterparts and subjected to repeated instances of sexual harassment over the course of a decade. (Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., First Amended Complaint (Aug. 23, 2021), Case No. 21STCV26571.) Similarly, in 2022, the Department filed suit against Tesla for ongoing race-based harassment of black employees dating back to 2012. (Department of Fair Housing and Employment v. Tesla, Inc., Complaint (Feb. 9, 2022), Case No. 22CV006830.)
In response to the Department's lawsuits, both Activision Blizzard and Tesla argued to the court that the Department is subject to the same administrative statute of limitations as an individual plaintiff granted a right to sue notice. In both cases the court agreed with the defendants and limited the Department's enforcement authority to only those matters occurring within the one-year statute of limitations, thus preventing the Department from litigating the full decade-long malfeasance. (California Civil Rights Department v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., Order on Consent Decree (Jan. 17, 2024), Case No. 21STCV26571, Department of Fair Housing and Employment v. Tesla, Inc., Order re: Ruling on Submitted Matter (Nov. 18, 2022), Case No. 22CV006830.) The legal precedent established in these decisions is now severely limiting the Department's ability to seek redress for years-long violations of the state's civil rights laws.
Seeking to ensure that the Activision Blizzard and Tesla decisions do not needlessly hamstring California’s civil rights enforcement authority, this bill would expressly create a seven-year statute of limitations for the Department to file suits on behalf of similarly situated classes of plaintiffs. The author and proponents of this measure note that while the shorter statute of limitations is appropriate for individualized harm, pattern or practice violations can occur for years before the pattern of wrongdoing comes to light. The proponents of this measure contend that a longer look-back period is appropriate for a state regulator that is tasked with preventing workplace and housing discrimination. In opposition to this measure, a coalition of business and tort reform organizations argue that a seven-year statute of limitations is too long. The opposition coalition notes, “Statutes of limitations exist for a simple purpose – to ensure that claims are brought while evidence exists. Both plaintiffs and defendants rely on evidence in proving their case. And both parties lose evidence as time passes."
The opposition is correct in noting that a seven-year statute of limitations is longer than many provisions in California law. The opposition is also correct in noting that most civil actions must be filed between two and five years after the offending act occurs. However, most civil statutes of limitations are for individual plaintiffs. They are not necessarily designed to handle patterns or practices of malfeasance that impact numerous potential plaintiffs and pervade organizations. It should be noted that this bill does not impact the individual plaintiff statues of limitations under the FEHA. Because individualized actions are more fact-specific than pattern or practice claims, this is appropriate. For example, a witness may need to remember a specific instance in which a plaintiff was sexually harassed. This memory is likely to become less reliable over time; thus this bill retains one to three year statute of limitation for individual claims. Conversely, it is wholly conceivable that a witness could remember general instances of sexual harassment that repeatedly occurred over multiple years for a longer period of time. Given that the specific details of a specific instance may not be necessary to demonstrate a pattern or practice of unlawful behavior, specific witness recollections (the type that fade over time) may not be as important in these cases. Thus, the longer statute of limitations for group-based claims brought by the Department seems to be both practical, appropriate, and wholly in line with the purpose of statutes of limitation.
Recognizing the unique nature of the processes utilized by the Department, whereby the Department investigates a claim, potentially seeks mediation, and then opts to file a case or defer the litigation to the original complainant, the existing law provides for the tolling of various statutes of limitations and other deadlines in order to permit these processes to play out in a reasonable manner. This measure adds several new tolling provisions consistent with the spirit of existing law. First, the bill tolls the complainant's one-year window to file a civil action following the issuance of a right-to-sue notice for the duration of a claimant's timely appeal of the Department's decision to close the case. Under the current set of guidelines, even if an appeal were successful, the Department would not be able to proceed with a suit on behalf of the complainant—the combination of the investigation time limit and the filing time limit would prohibit the Department from pursuing the action in court. Secondly, the bill extends the administrative deadlines for the Department to investigate claims to account for any additional time specified in written agreements between the Department and respondents, additional time necessary to adjudicate petitions to compel information and documents, and appeals of the Department’s decision to close complaints.
Additionally, the bill permits the Department to delay issuing a right to sue notice when the Department determines that a complaint is related to an ongoing complaint filed by the Department as a group or class complaint for purposes of an investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action. This provision enables the Department to issue a right to sue notice after 150 days to a complainant who requests the notice while not requiring the Department to do so when the issue is still being adjudicated as a part of a broader group or class based action. This provision is intended to avoid duplicative litigation while a class claim is pending. Finally, this makes several technical and conforming changes to the procedural provisions of FEHA.
According to the Author
The California Civil Rights Department ("CRD") is the institutional centerpiece of California's defense against discrimination, harassment, and other civil rights violations. Each year, CRD serves the public interest by investigating thousands of complaints of civil rights violations, mediating and settling many of those complaints, and prosecuting high-impact civil actions for the purpose of protecting the rights of a large number of Californians.
SB 1022 would clarify the law that allows CRD to effectively investigate and prosecute violations of Californians' civil rights.
Stopping workplace discrimination based on race, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, and other characteristics protected under the Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA") should be a priority of the state of California. SB 1022 empowers CRD to stop systemic discriminatory practices and provide justice to working people who have been victims of systemic discrimination.
Arguments in Support
This bill is co-sponsored by Legal Aid at Work, Equality California, and Equal Rights Advocates and is supported by a broad range of civil rights and labor organizations. In support of the bill, the co-sponsors jointly write:
Based on our experiences working closely with clients and the CRD, we know firsthand how impactful the prosecutorial arm of the agency can be in achieving meaningful results for claimants. The ability of the Department to address and correct discriminatory policy and practice at large employers, for example, as well as the ability to deliver relief to groups of harmed workers, without the formal constraints of civil class actions, are incredibly important tools. Just last year, CRD reached a $54 million settlement for workers suffering gender discrimination and equal pay violations at a Santa Monica video game company, which will provide relief to women who were employees or contract workers in
California between October 12, 2015 and December 31, 2020.1 CRD settlements also help prevent future discrimination and harassment by including programmatic relief measures for respondents to take going forward to ensure compliance with California civil rights laws.
However, CRD remains limited in its capacity to thoroughly and effectively prosecute systemic discrimination complaints. Although many complaints affecting a class or group, involve discriminatory practices that go back years, the department must adhere to the same statute of limitations as an individual claimant – one year. CRD must also complete their investigations of these claims within one year, despite the reality that information gathering in these investigations, particularly for group/class complaints, takes considerable time. This one-year investigation deadline is inadequate for a thorough investigation of claims, and leads to administrative inefficiency within the department – when individuals file complaints that are already the subject of ongoing CRD group/class investigations, they cannot be easily aggregated into ongoing investigations but rather must be completed on their own individual one-year timeline.
SB 1022 would address these concerns by allowing CRD to more fully rectify long-running civil rights violations and provide redress to as many victims as possible by clarifying that certain deadlines applicable to individual complainants do not apply to CRD actions to remedy systemic discrimination. This change would better align California law with federal interpretations of the timelines applicable to CRD's counterpart agency, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) – that the agency is not subject to Title VII's deadlines for individual workers.
Further, SB 1022 would allow CRD to hold in abeyance investigations of administrative complaints that may be resolved by actions CRD is already pursuing, so that thorough investigations can occur to resolve the maximum number of claims pertaining to the same discriminatory practices. This ensures that the Department can more efficiently use its limited resources to effectively enforce our civil rights laws in the case of broad, systemic violations, resolving the maximum number of claims pertaining to the same underlying discriminatory practices. In addition to preserving Department resources, this will also be beneficial to the respondents who already responding to investigations or litigation by the Department because they will not have to respond to related individual complaints during the time that they are held in abeyance.
SB 1022 is an important measure to ensure CRD has a robust ability to represent the interests of the state in enforcing California’s public policy to safeguard the rights and opportunities of all persons and protect against unlawful discrimination and other civil rights violations. For many low-wage workers, the CRD offers the single realistic remedy to address discriminatory housing and employment practices and for this reason, it is crucial that the Department have the ability to thoroughly and effectively prosecute violations of the law.
Arguments in Opposition
As stated this measure is opposed by a coalition of business and tort reform advocates including the California Chamber of Commerce, the Civil Justice Association of California, and California Retailers Association. A coalition letter submitted by the opponents of the measure states:
To put it simply: statutes of limitations require cases to be brought while the evidence is relatively fresh to ensure that our judicial system has the evidence to properly assess claims and come to the correct verdict.
Not only do statutes of limitations ensure memories and evidence are fresh, but they also ensure illegal behavior is promptly reported and vanquished. This is why, for most civil claims, the statute of limitations will be between two and five years. For example, most personal injury lawsuits have a two-year statute of limitations. For contract cases, it varies from two-to-four years. For property damage, it is generally three years. For claims against a government entity, claims must be filed within in as little as six months. The default statute of limitations for laws without a specified statute of limitation is three years. See Code of Civil Procedure Sections 312, 338, 345. State entities filing claims are subject to these statutes of limitations as well. See, e.g., People v. Overstock.com, Inc. (2017) 12 Cal. App. 5th 1064, 1076-1078 (applying UCL four-year statute of limitations to case brought by the Attorney General); Code of Civil Procedure Section 345 ("The limitations prescribed in this chapter apply to actions brought in the name of the state or county or for the benefit of the state or county, in the same manner as to actions by private parties.")
It is unclear why the CRD requires such a significant statute of limitations. For example, this proposed statute of limitations is more than twice the statute of limitations presently afforded to an individual employee or CRD to bring an action for an alleged unlawful employment practice.3 Further, because CRD is allowed to investigate a group or class claim for two years prior to filing a lawsuit, by the time the lawsuit even begins it will have been nine years since the start of the limitations period (or longer if the investigatory period is extended).
SB 1022 undermines the very purpose of a statute of limitations. The evidence available to confirm or refute a claim will shrink. Memories will fade. Former employees will change jobs, retire, or, in some cases, pass on. The very methods by which we maintain data may become inaccessible or unavailable. As the available information about an event shrinks the claim becomes harder to defend. The defendant will be forced to assess what is the better option – pay the expensive attorney's fees to litigate a claim where a plaintiff claims perfect memory and no other witnesses or evidence remains … or just pay the plaintiff a settlement because defending the claim without evidence would be impossible.
FISCAL COMMENTS
According to the Assembly Appropriations analysis, no significant state costs. CRD reports no impact or possible cost savings, since these changes may make it easier to handle multiple discrimination complaints in one group action rather than filing individual actions. Courts may experience minor cost savings for the same reason.
VOTES
SENATE FLOOR: 30-9-1
YES: Archuleta, Ashby, Atkins, Becker, Blakespear, Bradford, Caballero, Cortese, Dodd, Durazo, Eggman, Glazer, Gonzalez, Hurtado, Laird, Limón, McGuire, Menjivar, Min, Newman, Padilla, Portantino, Roth, Rubio, Skinner, Smallwood-Cuevas, Stern, Umberg, Wahab, Wiener
NO: Alvarado-Gil, Dahle, Grove, Jones, Nguyen, Niello, Ochoa Bogh, Seyarto, Wilk
ABS, ABST OR NV: Allen
ASM JUDICIARY: 9-3-0
YES: Kalra, Bauer-Kahan, Bryan, Connolly, Haney, Maienschein, McKinnor, Pacheco, Reyes
NO: Dixon, Joe Patterson, Sanchez
ASM APPROPRIATIONS: 11-4-0
YES: Wicks, Arambula, Bryan, Calderon, Wendy Carrillo, Mike Fong, Grayson, Haney, Hart, Pellerin, Villapudua
NO: Sanchez, Dixon, Jim Patterson, Ta
UPDATED
VERSION: April 11, 2024
CONSULTANT: Nicholas Liedtke / JUD. / (916) 319-2334 FN: 0003700
Date of Hearing: July 2, 2024
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Buffy Wicks, Chair
SBPCA Bill Id:SB 1022
Author:(Skinner) – As Amended Ver:April 11, 2024
Policy Committee: | Judiciary | Vote: | 9 - 3 |
|
| ||
|
|
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY:
This bill specifies procedural timelines and statutes of limitation for group and class lawsuits filed by the Civil Rights Department (CRD) under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA).
FISCAL EFFECT:
No significant state costs. CRD reports no impact or possible cost savings, since these changes may make it easier to handle multiple discrimination complaints in one group action rather than filing individual actions. Courts may experience minor cost savings for the same reason.
COMMENTS:
- Purpose. According to the author:
SB 1022 would clarify the law that allows CRD to effectively investigate and prosecute violations of Californians’ civil rights. Stopping workplace discrimination based on race, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, and other characteristics protected under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) should be a priority of the state of California. SB 1022 empowers CRD to stop systemic discriminatory practices and provide justice to working people who have been victims of systemic discrimination.
- Background. As summarized in the analysis of this bill by the Assembly Committee on Judiciary, courts have recently held that CRD must adhere to the same procedural timelines that apply to individual lawsuits when bringing lawsuits on behalf of a group or class of litigants. However, litigating a group or class action poses unique challenges and may require additional time for investigation and coordinating between multiple plaintiffs and their complaints. Accordingly, this bill specifies procedural timelines for group or class lawsuits filed by CRD. The bill creates a seven-year statute of limitations in which CRD may file an action on behalf of a similarly situated class of plaintiffs, adds tolling provisions to pause the statute of limitations for certain group actions for violations of the FEHA, and permits CRD to delay issuing a right to sue notice for an individual complaint when CRD determines that the complaint is related to an ongoing group or class complaint filed by CRD.
Analysis Prepared by: Annika Carlson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081
Date of Hearing: June 11, 2024
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
Ash Kalra, Chair
SBPCA Bill Id:SB 1022
Author:(Skinner) – As Amended Ver:April 11, 2024
SENATE VOTE: 30-9
SUBJECT: Enforcement of civil rights
KEY ISSUE: should various timelines and statute of limitations applicable to enforcement actions under the fair employment and housing act be extended?
SYNOPSIS
The Civil Rights Department (Department) is California’s primary governmental agency for the enforcement of the state’s civil rights laws. The agency primarily receives complaints stemming from violations of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), evaluates the complaints, and seeks to mediate between the parties, if possible. The Department can then either file suit to enforce the law itself, or authorize a complainant to bring their own cause of action. One of the most impactful areas in which the Department litigates involves cases in which a “pattern or practice” of unlawful conduct is occurring that impacts multiple plaintiffs. The Department’s resources can be particularly helpful in linking the various claims and merging the litigation. However, in the last several years, California courts are forcing the Department to adhere to the statutes of limitations that apply to cases brought by individual plaintiffs: timelines that are inappropriate for the more complex cases involving numerous aggrieved individuals.
Seeking to restore the ability for the Department to fully litigate cases involving groups or classes of potential aggrieved parties, this bill would establish a seven-year statute of limitations for such cases. The extended statute of limitations enables the Department to thoroughly investigate claims and reach back to punish patterns of unlawful conduct that may have occurred prior to the issues coming to the attention of the Department. While lengthy, this statute of limitations is workable, as these cases do not always rely on the granular-level of detail of specific incidents that are typically required by cases brought by individuals. This measure also tolls several existing statute of limitations to enable specified administrative processes, including adjudicating delays in evidence production, to take place. Finally, the bill makes several technical and conforming changes to the procedural aspects of the FEHA.
This measure is co-sponsored by Legal Aid at Work, Equality California, and Equal Rights Advocates and is supported by a broad range of civil rights and labor organizations. The proponents of this measure highlight the positive impact that Department litigation has on vulnerable Californians and reinforce the need for the Department to retain the ability to prosecute cases on behalf of groups of aggrieved persons. The bill is opposed by business and tort reform advocates including the California Chamber of Commerce and the Civil Justice Association of California. The opposition contends that the seven-year statute of limitations is too lengthy, frustrates the general purpose of statutes of limitations, and likely results in unreliable testimony and lost documents that would undermine defendants’ cases.
SUMMARY: Modifies and expands the timelines for the Department to issue right to sue notices as well as the timelines for filing various civil actions related to violations of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). Specifically, this bill:
- Provides that a complaint filed by the Department that is treated as a group or class complaint may be filed within seven years of the date in which the original complaint was filed with the Department.
- Modifies the time during which an individual’s statute of limitations for filing an action pursuant to the FEHA is tolled to be either:
- When the Department files a civil action based on the alleged violation; or
- One year after the Department issues either the written notice that the Department is not electing to file a lawsuit on behalf of the complainant or, if the complainant timely appeals the Department’s closure of their complaint, written notice that the complaint remains closed following the appeal, as specified.
- Modifies the time during which the Department’s statute of limitations to bring an action pursuant to the FEHA is tolled to include:
- The amount of time specified in any written agreement between the Department and the respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable timeline;
- The length of time for which the Department investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified; and
- During a timely appeal of the Department’s decision to close a complaint.
- Requires the Department, if it determines, in its discretion, that an individually filed unlawful employment practice complaint relates in whole or in part to a complaint filed in the name of the director or as a group or class complaint for the purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, to issue a right-to-sue notice either in response to a request from the complainant or after the director’s or group or class complaint has been fully and finally disposed of and all civil actions, appeals, or related proceedings have terminated.
- Modifies the time during which the Department deadline to issue a right to sue notice to an individual is tolled to include:
- The amount of time specified in any written agreement between the Department and the respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable timeline;
- The length of time the Department’s investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified; and
- During a timely appeal of the Department’s decision to close a complaint.
- Clarifies that no complaint in a housing discrimination action may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated, and removes this term from the provisions of existing law relating to housing discrimination actions filed by the Attorney General or the Department.
- Eliminates the requirement that the Department bring a civil action for housing discrimination in a county in the state in which the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, a county in which the relevant records are maintained and administered, a county in which the aggrieved person would have resided in the housing, or a county in which the defendant resides or maintains its principal office.
- Defines, within the FEHA, “group or class complaint” to include any complaint alleging a pattern or practice. Provides that this definition is declaratory of existing law.
EXISTING LAW:
- Establishes the FEHA to protect and safeguard the right and opportunity of all persons to seek, obtain, and hold employment without discrimination or abridgment on account of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or military and veteran status. (Government Code Section 12900 et seq.)
- Establishes within the Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency, the Department and tasks the Department with receiving, investigating, conciliating, mediating, and prosecuting complaints alleging violations of the state’s civil rights laws. (Government Code Sections 12901 & 12930.)
- Makes it an unlawful employment practice in California, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification or, except where based on applicable security regulations established by the United States or this state, for employers and labor organizations to engage in discrimination and other negative employment actions on the basis of a protected class subject to certain exemptions. (Government Code Section 12940.)
- Authorizes any person claiming to have been aggrieved by an unlawful employment practice to file a complaint with the Department. (Government Code Section 12960.)
- Requires, upon receiving a complaint pursuant to 4), the Department to promptly investigate the allegations. (Government Code Section 12963.)
- Authorizes the Department to bring an action in its own name and on behalf of the person claiming to be aggrieved, if the Department determines the circumstances warrant and the parties did not resolve the dispute in the Department’s internal dispute resolution division, as specified. (Government Code Section 12965 (a).)
- Requires the Department, if it does not file a civil action within 150 days after the receipt of a complaint, or if the Department determines it will not bring an action, to promptly notify the person who filed the complaint, and if that person so requests, provide a right to sue notice. (Government Code Section 12965 (c).)
- Requires, in the event a person filing a complaint does not request a right to sue notice pursuant to 7), the Department to issue the notice upon the completion of its own investigation, which generally must be one year after the complaint was filed. (Ibid.)
- Tolls the timeline provided in 8) during the pendency of any mandatory or voluntary dispute resolution processes. (Ibid.)
- Provides that upon the receipt of a right to sue notice, an aggrieved person may file a civil action in a superior court in any county in which the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, in the county in which the records relevant to the practice are maintained or administered, in the county in which the aggrieved person would have worked or would have had access to the public accommodation but for the alleged unlawful practice, or in the county where the defendant has their residence or personal office, as specified. (Ibid.)
- Authorizes the aggrieved party, if the unlawful employment practice adversely affects a group or class of persons, or raises questions of law similar to a group or class, to file the complaint on behalf of and as representative of a group or class. (Government Code Section 12961.)
- Establishes a statute of limitations for individuals to file a complaint for an unfair employment practice with the Department as follows:
- One year if the underlying violation is for a violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act;
- Two years for wage violations, as specified;
- Three years for sexual harassment claims; and
- Ten years for victims of human trafficking. (Government Code Section 12960 (e).)
- Extends the statute of limitations provided in 12) as follows:
- 90 days if the person filing the complaint learned of the facts underlying the complaint during the extended 90-day period;
- One year if the person needs to make a substitute identification of an actual employer; and
- One year if the aggrieved person is a minor. (Government Code Section 12960 (e)(6).)
- Authorizes the tolling of the one year statute of limitations for a person to file a civil action upon receipt of a right to sue notice if the person has also filed a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, as specified. (Government Code Section 12965 (f).)
- Provides that statute of limitations for the filing of civil actions by the Department is tolled during the pendency of any dispute resolute processes conducted by the Department. (Government Code Section 12965 (a).)
- Authorizes the Department to file a civil action on behalf of a class of individuals if a verified complaint adversely affects a group or class of persons in a similar manner or raises questions of law common to a group or class. (Government Code Section 12965 (a).)
- Establishes procedural guidelines for the prevention and elimination of housing discrimination under the FEHA which, generally, mirror the processes utilized by the Department to evaluate unlawful employment practices as described in 4) through 16). (Government Code Section 12980 through 12989.3.)
- Establishes a statute of limitations for the filing of housing discrimination related claims of one year from the date upon which the violation occurred. (Government Code Section 12980 (b).)
FISCAL EFFECT: As currently in print this bill is keyed fiscal.
COMMENTS: The Civil Rights Department (Department) is California’s lead governmental agency for the enforcement of the state’s civil rights laws. The existing law generally enables aggrieved persons to file complaints with the Department, which then investigates the issues and can either file a lawsuit on the aggrieved party’s behalf, or authorize the complainant to file their own individual lawsuit. As a result of the potentially lengthy investigative process and internal dispute resolution tools utilized by the Department, a complex web of statutes of limitations, as well as tolling statutes, govern when cases must be filed in order to enforce the state’s civil rights laws. In recent years, courts have strictly applied some of these statute of limitations in cases involving “pattern or practice” violations, thus limiting the scope of actions the Department could take to hold workplaces accountable for longstanding discriminatory behavior. Seeking to ensure that these chronic violations of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) can be properly prosecuted, this bill would extend the statute of limitations for filing group class complaints to seven years, and extend various other deadlines utilized by the Department to prosecute complaints. In support of this bill, the author states:
The California Civil Rights Department (“CRD”) is the institutional centerpiece of California’s defense against discrimination, harassment, and other civil rights violations. Each year, CRD serves the public interest by investigating thousands of complaints of civil rights violations, mediating and settling many of those complaints, and prosecuting high-impact civil actions for the purpose of protecting the rights of a large number of Californians.
SB 1022 would clarify the law that allows CRD to effectively investigate and prosecute violations of Californians’ civil rights.
Stopping workplace discrimination based on race, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, and other characteristics protected under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) should be a priority of the state of California. SB 1022 empowers CRD to stop systemic discriminatory practices and provide justice to working people who have been victims of systemic discrimination.
The Department’s complaint review process. The FEHA is one of California’s primary legal tools for adjudicating claims involving harassment and discrimination in the workplace and in housing. Unlike most state laws, most claims arising under FEHA cannot be immediately litigated by a complainant in court. Instead, a complaint must first be filed with the Department , which then investigates the matter. The Department then has between 150 days and two years, depending on the nature of the underlying complaint, to file a civil action on behalf of the complainant or to issue a right to sue notice to the complaint, permitting them to file a civil action in their own capacity. Throughout the investigative process, existing law also provides for various administrative avenues that the Department can utilize to mediate disputes, including utilizing the mediation services of the Department’s Community Conflict Resolution Unit and the Dispute Resolution Division.
In the event that a mediated solution cannot be reached by the parties, a lawsuit may be filed. The Department generally is authorized to file a lawsuit within the next one to three years, depending on the nature of the underlying complaint. Individual complainants, on the other hand, must file their lawsuit within one year of receiving a right to sue notice from the Department. To ensure that statutes of limitations do not expire during the pendency of the Department’s investigation or attempts at mediation, the existing law provides for the tolling of the applicable statute of limitation while these processes play out.
Recent court decisions have limited the Department’s ability to prosecute pattern or practice violations. In addition to filing civil actions on behalf of aggrieved individuals, existing law authorizes the Department to file actions on behalf of classes of similarly situated persons, whether or not they lodged a complaint with the Department. Typically, these quasi-class action suits occur as a result of a “pattern or practice” violation in which the alleged perpetrator has committed the same offense against multiple individuals over a prolonged period of time. One such example arose in 2021, when the Department filed a lawsuit against Activision Blizzard for unlawful employment practices related to sex discrimination. The Department alleged that female employees were frequently paid less than their male counterparts and subjected to repeated instances of sexual harassment over the course of a decade. (Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., First Amended Complaint (Aug. 23, 2021), Case No. 21STCV26571.) Similarly, in 2022, the Department filed suit against Tesla for ongoing race-based harassment of black employees dating back to 2012. (Department of Fair Housing and Employment v. Tesla, Inc., Complaint (Feb. 9, 2022), Case No. 22CV006830.)
In response to the Department’s lawsuits, both Activision Blizzard and Tesla argued to the court that the Department is subject to the same administrative statute of limitations as an individual plaintiff granted a right to sue notice. In both cases the court agreed with the defendants and limited the Department’s enforcement authority to only those matters occurring within the one-year statute of limitations, thus preventing the Department from litigating the full decade-long malfeasance. (California Civil Rights Department v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., Order on Consent Decree (Jan. 17, 2024), Case No. 21STCV26571, Department of Fair Housing and Employment v. Tesla, Inc., Order re: Ruling on Submitted Matter (Nov. 18, 2022), Case No. 22CV006830.) The legal precedent established in these decisions is now severely limiting the Department’s ability to seek redress for years-long violations of the state’s civil rights laws.
This bill would extend the statute of limitations for the Department to file civil actions on the behalf of aggrieved groups of Californians. Seeking to ensure that the Activision Blizzard and Tesla decisions do not needlessly hamstring California’s civil rights enforcement authority, this bill would expressly create a seven-year statute of limitations for the Department to file suits on behalf of similarly situated classes of plaintiffs. The author and proponents of this measure note that while the shorter statute of limitations is appropriate for individualized harm, pattern or practice violations can occur for years before the pattern of wrongdoing comes to light. The proponents of this measure contend that a longer look-back period is appropriate for a state regulator that is tasked with preventing workplace and housing discrimination. In opposition to this measure, a coalition of business and tort reform organizations argue that a seven-year statute of limitations is too long. The opposition coalition notes, “Statutes of limitations exist for a simple purpose – to ensure that claims are brought while evidence exists. Both plaintiffs and defendants rely on evidence in proving their case. And both parties lose evidence as time passes.”
The opposition is correct in noting that a seven-year statute of limitations is longer than many provisions in California law. The opposition is also correct in noting that most civil actions must be filed between two and five years after the offending act occurs. However, most civil statutes of limitations are for individual plaintiffs. They are not necessarily designed to handle patterns or practices of malfeasance that impact numerous potential plaintiffs and pervade organizations. It should be noted that this bill does not impact the individual plaintiff statues of limitations under the FEHA. Because individualized actions are more fact-specific than pattern or practice claims, this is appropriate. For example, a witness may need to remember a specific instance in which a plaintiff was sexually harassed. This memory is likely to become less reliable over time; thus this bill retains one to three year statute of limitation for individual claims. Conversely, it is wholly conceivable that a witness could remember general instances of sexual harassment that repeatedly occurred over multiple years for a longer period of time. Given that the specific details of a specific instance may not be necessary to demonstrate a pattern or practice of unlawful behavior, specific witness recollections (the type that fade over time) may not be as important in these cases. Thus, the longer statute of limitations for group-based claims brought by the Department seems to be both practical, appropriate, and wholly in line with the purpose of statutes of limitation.
This bill extends additional administrative timelines and statutes of limitations related to actions for violations of the state’s FEHA. Recognizing the unique nature of the processes utilized by the Department, whereby the Department investigates a claim, potentially seeks mediation, and then opts to file a case or defer the litigation to the original complainant, the existing law provides for the tolling of various statutes of limitations and other deadlines in order to permit these processes to play out in a reasonable manner. This measure adds several new tolling provisions consistent with the spirit of existing law. First, the bill tolls the complainant’s one-year window to file a civil action following the issuance of a right-to-sue notice for the duration of a claimant’s timely appeal of the Department’s decision to close the case. Under the current set of guidelines, even if an appeal were successful, the Department would not be able to proceed with a suit on behalf of the complainant—the combination of the investigation time limit and the filing time limit would prohibit the Department from pursuing the action in court. Secondly, the bill extends the administrative deadlines for the Department to investigate claims to account for any additional time specified in written agreements between the Department and respondents, additional time necessary to adjudicate petitions to compel information and documents, and appeals of the Department’s decision to close complaints. These provisions essentially enable the Department to conduct its work and prevent respondents from “running out the clock” on a complex Department investigation as a means of evading liability.
Additionally, the bill permits the Department to delay issuing a right to sue notice when the Department determines that a complaint is related to an ongoing complaint filed by the Department as a group or class complaint for purposes of an investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action. This provision enables the Department to issue a right to sue notice after 150 days to a complainant who requests the notice while not requiring the Department to do so when the issue is still being adjudicated as a part of a broader group or class based action. This provision is intended to avoid duplicative litigation while a class claim is pending. Finally, this makes several technical and conforming changes to the procedural provisions of FEHA.
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: This bill is co-sponsored by Legal Aid at Work, Equality California, and Equal Rights Advocates and is supported by a broad range of civil rights and labor organizations. In support of the bill, the co-sponsors jointly write:
Based on our experiences working closely with clients and the CRD, we know firsthand how impactful the prosecutorial arm of the agency can be in achieving meaningful results for claimants. The ability of the Department to address and correct discriminatory policy and practice at large employers, for example, as well as the ability to deliver relief to groups of harmed workers, without the formal constraints of civil class actions, are incredibly important tools. Just last year, CRD reached a $54 million settlement for workers suffering gender discrimination and equal pay violations at a Santa Monica video game company, which will provide relief to women who were employees or contract workers in
California between October 12, 2015 and December 31, 2020.1 CRD settlements also help prevent future discrimination and harassment by including programmatic relief measures for respondents to take going forward to ensure compliance with California civil rights laws.
However, CRD remains limited in its capacity to thoroughly and effectively prosecute systemic discrimination complaints. Although many complaints affecting a class or group, involve discriminatory practices that go back years, the department must adhere to the same statute of limitations as an individual claimant – one year. CRD must also complete their investigations of these claims within one year, despite the reality that information gathering in these investigations, particularly for group/class complaints, takes considerable time. This one-year investigation deadline is inadequate for a thorough investigation of claims, and leads to administrative inefficiency within the department – when individuals file complaints that are already the subject of ongoing CRD group/class investigations, they cannot be easily aggregated into ongoing investigations but rather must be completed on their own individual one-year timeline.
SB 1022 would address these concerns by allowing CRD to more fully rectify long-running civil rights violations and provide redress to as many victims as possible by clarifying that certain deadlines applicable to individual complainants do not apply to CRD actions to remedy systemic discrimination. This change would better align California law with federal interpretations of the timelines applicable to CRD’s counterpart agency, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) – that the agency is not subject to Title VII’s deadlines for individual workers.
Further, SB 1022 would allow CRD to hold in abeyance investigations of administrative complaints that may be resolved by actions CRD is already pursuing, so that thorough investigations can occur to resolve the maximum number of claims pertaining to the same discriminatory practices. This ensures that the Department can more efficiently use its limited resources to effectively enforce our civil rights laws in the case of broad, systemic violations, resolving the maximum number of claims pertaining to the same underlying discriminatory practices. In addition to preserving Department resources, this will also be beneficial to the respondents who already responding to investigations or litigation by the Department because they will not have to respond to related individual complaints during the time that they are held in abeyance.
SB 1022 is an important measure to ensure CRD has a robust ability to represent the interests of the state in enforcing California’s public policy to safeguard the rights and opportunities of all persons and protect against unlawful discrimination and other civil rights violations. For many low-wage workers, the CRD offers the single realistic remedy to address discriminatory housing and employment practices and for this reason, it is crucial that the Department have the ability to thoroughly and effectively prosecute violations of the law.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: As stated this measure is opposed by a coalition of business and tort reform advocates including the California Chamber of Commerce, the Civil Justice Association of California, and California Retailers Association. A coalition letter submitted by the opponents of the measure states:
To put it simply: statutes of limitations require cases to be brought while the evidence is relatively fresh to ensure that our judicial system has the evidence to properly assess claims and come to the correct verdict.
Not only do statutes of limitations ensure memories and evidence are fresh, but they also ensure illegal behavior is promptly reported and vanquished. This is why, for most civil claims, the statute of limitations will be between two and five years. For example, most personal injury lawsuits have a two-year statute of limitations. For contract cases, it varies from two-to-four years. For property damage, it is generally three years. For claims against a government entity, claims must be filed within in as little as six months. The default statute of limitations for laws without a specified statute of limitation is three years. See Code of Civil Procedure Sections 312, 338, 345. State entities filing claims are subject to these statutes of limitations as well. See, e.g., People v. Overstock.com, Inc. (2017) 12 Cal. App. 5th 1064, 1076-1078 (applying UCL four-year statute of limitations to case brought by the Attorney General); Code of Civil Procedure Section 345 (“The limitations prescribed in this chapter apply to actions brought in the name of the state or county or for the benefit of the state or county, in the same manner as to actions by private parties.”)
It is unclear why the CRD requires such a significant statute of limitations. For example, this proposed statute of limitations is more than twice the statute of limitations presently afforded to an individual employee or CRD to bring an action for an alleged unlawful employment practice.3 Further, because CRD is allowed to investigate a group or class claim for two years prior to filing a lawsuit, by the time the lawsuit even begins it will have been nine years since the start of the limitations period (or longer if the investigatory period is extended).
SB 1022 undermines the very purpose of a statute of limitations. The evidence available to confirm or refute a claim will shrink. Memories will fade. Former employees will change jobs, retire, or, in some cases, pass on. The very methods by which we maintain data may become inaccessible or unavailable. As the available information about an event shrinks the claim becomes harder to defend. The defendant will be forced to assess what is the better option – pay the expensive attorney’s fees to litigate a claim where a plaintiff claims perfect memory and no other witnesses or evidence remains … or just pay the plaintiff a settlement because defending the claim without evidence would be impossible.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
Equal Rights Advocates (co-sponsor)
Equality California (co-sponsor)
Legal Aid at Work (co-sponsor)
AAUW California
APLA Health
California Domestic Workers Coalition
California Employment Lawyers Association
California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO
California Legislative LGBTQ Caucus
California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
California TRANScends
California Women's Law Center
California Work and Family Coalition
Center for Immigrant Protection
Central California LGBTQ+ Collaborative
Child Care Law Center
Chinese for Affirmative Action
Church State Council
Courage California
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant
El/La Para TransLatinas
Legal Services for Prisoners With Children
National Asian Pacific American Families Against Substance Abuse
National Council of Jewish Women CA
National Employment Law Project
Parent Voices CA
Parivar Bay Area
Public Counsel
Root & Rebound
San Joaquin Pride Center
Solano Pride Center
TechEquity Collaborative
The Transgender District
TransFamily Support Services
Transgender Health and Wellness Center
Transgender Resource, Advocacy & Network Service
TransYouth Liberation
Underground Scholars Initiative
Worksafe
Youth Leadership Institute
Opposition
Acclamation Insurance Management Services
Allied Managed Care
California Association of Joint Powers Authorities
California Association of Sheet Metal & Air Conditioning Contractors National Association
California Association of Winegrape Growers
California Chamber of Commerce
California Employment Law Council
California Farm Bureau
California Financial Services Association
California Landscape Contractors Association
California League of Food Producers
California Retailers Association
California State Council of The Society for Human Resource Management
Civil Justice Association of California
Coalition of Small and Disabled Veteran Businesses
Construction Employers' Association
Family Business Association of California
Flasher Barricade Association
Housing Contractors of California
Public Risk Innovation, Solutions, and Management
Western Electrical Contractors Association
Analysis Prepared by: Nicholas Liedtke / JUD. / (916) 319-2334
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | SB 1022 |
THIRD READING
Bill No: SB 1022
Author: Skinner (D), et al.
Amended: 4/11/24
Vote: 21
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE: 9-2, 4/9/24
AYES: Umberg, Allen, Ashby, Caballero, Durazo, Laird, Min, Stern, Wahab
NOES: Wilk, Niello
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 5-2, 5/16/24
AYES: Caballero, Ashby, Becker, Bradford, Wahab
NOES: Jones, Seyarto
SUBJECT: Enforcement of civil rights
SOURCE: Equal Rights Advocates
Equality California
Legal Aid at Work
DIGEST:
This bill provides that the director of the Civil Rights Department (CRD) may file a group or class complaint alleging a violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) within a period of 7 years or fewer before the date of the alleged violation, and adds periods during which the CRD’s time frame to issue a right-to-sue notice and an individual’s time frame to sue following the receipt of a right-to-sue notice are tolled.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- Establishes the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). (Gov. Code, tit. 2, div. 3, pt. 2.8, §§ 12900 et seq.)
- Establishes the Civil Rights Department (CRD) and the Civil Rights Council (Council) within the CRD to effectuate and enforce FEHA, as specified. (Gov. Code, §§ 12901-12907.)
- Makes it an unlawful employment practice in California, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification or, except where based on applicable security regulations established by the United States or this State, for employers and labor organizations to engage in discrimination and other negative employment actions on the basis of the characteristics listed in 2)(a), subject to certain exemptions. (Gov. Code, § 12940.)
- Sets forth procedures for the prevention and elimination of practices made unlawful under 4), including:
- Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged unlawful practice may file a complaint with the CRD, as specified. (Gov. Code, § 12960.)
- Upon receipt of a complaint alleging facts sufficient to constitute a violation of 4), the CRD must make a prompt investigation of the allegations. (Gov. Code, § 12963.)
- If the CRD does not file a civil action within 150 days after the filing of a complaint, or the CRD determines earlier that it will not bring a civil action, the CRD shall promptly notify the person claiming to be aggrieved that the CRD shall issue, on request, a right to sue notice; the CRD must issue the notice upon completion of its investigation, which must be no later than one year after the complaint was filed (or two years, for complaints treated as group or class complaints). (Gov. Code, § 12965(c).)
- Upon receipt of a right to sue notice, an aggrieved person may file a civil action in a superior court. (Gov. Code, § 12965(c).)
- Provides statutes of limitations for actions brought pursuant to 4), and for those time frames to be extended or tolled for certain periods, including a one year statute of limitations for a violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act, a two-year statute of limitations for specified wage violations, and a three-years statute of limitations for specified sexual harassment and FEHA violations; these limitations windows are tolled for specified periods. (Gov. Code, §§ 12960(e), 12965.)
- Authorizes, where an unlawful practice alleged in a verified complaint under 4) that adversely affects a group or class of persons in a similar manner or raises questions of law common to a group or class, the aggrieved individual or the CRD to file the complaint on behalf of and as representative of such group or class. The CRD may investigate a complaint as a group or class complaint. (Gov. Code, § 12961.)
- Establishes procedures for the prevention and elimination of discrimination in housing under FEHA which are generally similar to those for unlawful employment practices, including permitting the Attorney General or the director of the CRD to make, sign, and file complaints citing practices that appear to relate to housing discrimination, as specified. (Gov. Code, § 12980.)
- States that no complaint for housing discrimination under FEHA may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated. (Gov. Code, § 12980(b).)
- Provides that, when CRD brings a housing complaint in the public interest, the civil action shall be filed in any county in the state where the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, in the county in which the records relevant to that practice are maintained or administered, or the county in which the aggrieved person would have resided in the housing accommodation. (Gov. Code, § 12981.)
This bill:
- Defines, within FEHA, “group or class complaint” as including any complaint alleging a pattern or practice; and states that this definition is declarative of, and clarifies, existing law.
- Provides that a complaint filed by the director of CRD, or the director’s authorized representative, or an unlawful employment practices complaint treated by the director or the director’s representative, as a group or class complaint may allege any violation of FEHA that occurred within a period of seven years or fewer before the date the complaint was filed.
- Modifies the time during which an individual’s time frame to bring a FEHA action following the filing of a complaint is tolled, to run until either (1) when CRD files a civil action for the alleged violation, or (2) one year after CRD issues either the written notice that the CRD is not electing to file a lawsuit on behalf of the complainant or, if the complainant timely appeals the CRD’s closure of their complaint, written notice that the complaint remains closed following the appeal. Under the existing language of the statute, the new tolling—during the complainant’s appeal of the CRD’s closure of the case—would apply retroactively.
- Modifies the time during which the director of CRD’s time frame to bring a FEHA civil action following the filing of a complaint is tolled, to include:
- The amount of time specified in any written agreement between CRD and the respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable timeline.
- The length of time for which the CRD’s investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified.
- During a timely appeal with the CRD of the CRD’s closure of the complaint.
- Requires the CRD, if it determines, in its discretion, that an individually filed unlawful employment practice complaint relates in whole or in part to a complaint filed in the name of the director or as a group or class complaint for the purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, to issue a right-to-sue notice either in response to a request from the complainant or after the director’s or group or class complaint has been fully and finally disposed of and all civil actions, appeals, or related proceedings have terminated.
- Modifies the time during which the CRD’s time frame to issue a right-to-sue notice to an individual complainant is tolled, to include:
- The amount of time specified in any written agreement between CRD and the respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable timeline.
- The length of time for which the CRD’s investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified.
- During a timely appeal with the CRD of the CRD’s closure of the complaint.
- Clarifies that no complaint in a housing discrimination action may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated, and removes this term from the subdivision relating to housing discrimination actions filed by the Attorney General or the director of the CRD.
- Eliminates the requirement that the CRD bring a civil action for housing discrimination in a county in the state in which the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, a county in which the relevant records are maintained and administered, a county in which the aggrieved person would have resided in the housing, or a county in which the defendant resides or maintains its principal office.
Comments
California’s FEHA establishes the mechanism by which Californians can seek relief from invidious discrimination in employment and housing. The FEHA requires all potential FEHA plaintiffs to file an administrative complaint with the CRD before proceeding to a civil action. The CRD is tasked with conducting an investigation and may opt to proceed with a suit in the name of the plaintiff; if the CRD elects not to sue in the plaintiff’s name, the plaintiff may file a lawsuit against the employer or housing provider. If the CRD determines that an administrative complaint relates to a class or group of similarly situated individuals, the CRD may also elect to proceed with a class or group claim.
This bill makes a number of changes to the provisions governing the FEHA’s administrative timelines. The most significant of these changes permits the CRD to file a group or class civil action alleging violations that date back seven years from the date the initial administrative complaint was filed. The bill also establishes tolling periods during the period in which the CRD must conduct its investigation and issue a right-to-sue notice, and during which a plaintiff has to file suit after receiving a right-to-sue notice, to include tolling during the pendency of an agreement between the CRD and the defendant, during the time when a plaintiff is appealing the CRD’s denial to pursue a claim, and during the pendency of a class action brought by the CRD that relates to the individual claim. These tolling periods are intended to bring greater efficiency to the claims process and avoid the filing of duplicative lawsuits. The bill also makes other changes to clarify the scope of class actions and provisions of the housing portions of FEHA.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No
According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, the fiscal impact is as follows:
- CRD indicates no fiscal impact (Fair Employment and Housing Enforcement and Litigation Fund). According to CRD, each section of this bill would either create cost savings or be cost neutral for CRD to the extent that it would result in the recovery of an unknown amount of litigation costs, including reasonable attorney’s fees, expert witness fees, and other costs to the extent that the department prevails in specified unlawful employment practices cases to the extent the court grants the recovery of such costs.
- Unknown, potentially-significant workload cost pressures to the courts (Trial Court Trust Fund, General Fund) to adjudicate alleged discriminatory practice cases brought by CRD and potentially other actions for which the deadlines would be tolled by this measure, as specified, that otherwise would not be filed under existing law. While the superior courts are not funded on a workload basis, an increase in workload could result in delayed court services and would put pressure on the General Fund to increase the amount appropriated to backfill for trial court operations. For illustrative purposes, the Governor’s 2024-25 state budget proposes $83.1 million ongoing General Fund to continue to backfill the Trial Court Trust Fund for expected revenue declines. However, Judicial Council indicates that given the existing filing parameters, the Judicial Council anticipates that the expanded authority to file in any county to have a minimal impact on the courts.
SUPPORT: (Verified 5/16/24)
Equal Rights Advocates (co-source)
Equality California (co-source)
Legal Aid at Work (co-source)
APLA Health
California Domestic Workers Coalition
California Employment Lawyers Association
California Legislative LGBTQ Caucus
California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
California TRANScends
California Work & Family Coalition
Center for Immigrant Protection – the Asylum Project and Parivar Bay Area
Central California LGBTQ+ Collaborative
Child Care Law Center
Chinese for Affirmative Action
Courage California
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant
El/La Para TransLatinas
Legal Services for Prisoners with Children/AOUON
National Asian Pacific American Families Against Substance Abuse
National Council of Jewish Women California
National Empowerment Law Project
Parent Voices CA
Public Counsel
Root & Rebound
San Joaquin Pride Center
Solano Pride Center
TechEquity Collaborative
The Transgender District, San Francisco
Transgender Health & Wellness Center
Transgender Resource, Advocacy and Network Service
TransYouth Liberation and TransFamily Support Services
Underground Scholars Initiative Student Organization, UC Davis
Worksafe
Youth Leadership Institute
OPPOSITION: (Verified 5/16/24)
Acclamation Insurance Management Services
Allied Managed Care
California Association of Joint Powers Authorities
California Association of Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors National Association
California Association of Winegrape Growers
California Chamber of Commerce
California Employment Law Council
California Farm Bureau
California Financial Services Association
California Landscape Contractors Association
California League of Food Producers
California Retailers Association
California State Council for the Society of Human Resource Management
Civil Justice Association of California
Coalition of Small and Disabled Veteran Businesses
Construction Employers’ Association
Family Business Association of California
Flasher Barricade Association
Housing Contractors of California
Public Risk Innovation, Solution, and Management
Western Electrical Contractors Association
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: According to Equal Rights Advocates, Equality California, and Legal Aid at Work:
CRD remains limited in its capacity to thoroughly and effectively prosecute systemic discrimination complaints. Although many complaints initiated by CRD, as well as complaints affecting a class or group, involve discriminatory practices that go back years, the department must adhere to the same statute of limitations as an individual claimant–one year. Similarly, CRD must complete their investigations of these claims within one year, despite the reality that information gathering in these investigations, particularly for group/class complaints, takes considerable time. This one-year investigation deadline is inadequate for a thorough investigation of claims, and leads to administrative inefficiency within the department–when individuals file complaints that are already the subject of ongoing CRD group/class investigations, they cannot be easily aggregated into ongoing investigations but rather must complete on their own individual timelines.
SB 1022 would address these concerns by allowing CRD to more fully rectify long-running civil rights violations and provide redress to as many victims as possible by clarifying that certain deadlines applicable to individual complainants do not apply to CRD actions to remedy systemic discrimination. This change would align California law with federal interpretations of the timelines applicable to CRD’s counterpart agency, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)–that it is not subject to Title VII’s deadlines for individual workers. Further, SB 1022 would allow CRD to pause investigations of administrative complaints that may be resolved by actions CRD is already pursuing, so that thorough investigations can occur to resolve the maximum number of claims pertaining to the same discriminatory practices.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: According to the coalition of organizations in opposition:
Not only do statutes of limitations ensure memories and evidence are fresh, but they also ensure illegal behavior is promptly reported and vanquished. This is why, for most civil claims, the statute of limitations will be between two and five years. For example, most personal injury lawsuits have a two-year statute of limitations. For contract cases, it varies from two-to-four years. For property damage, it is generally three years. For claims against a government entity, claims must be filed within in as little as six months. The default statute of limitations for laws without a specified statute of limitation is three years. See Code of Civil Procedure Sections 312, 338, 345. State entities filing claims are subject to these statutes of limitations as well. See, e.g., People v. Overstock.com, Inc. (2017) 12 Cal. App. 5th 1064, 1076-1078 (applying UCL four-year statute of limitations to case brought by the Attorney General); Code of Civil Procedure Section 345 (“The limitations prescribed in this chapter apply to actions brought in the name of the state or county or for the benefit of the state or county, in the same manner as to actions by private parties.”)
It is unclear why the CRD requires such a significant statute of limitations… The evidence available to confirm or refute a claim will shrink. Memories will fade. Former employees will change jobs, retire, or, in some cases, pass on. The very methods by which we maintain data may become inaccessible or unavailable. As the available information about an event shrinks the claim becomes harder to defend. The defendant will be forced to assess what is the better option – pay the expensive attorney’s fees to litigate a claim where a plaintiff claims perfect memory and no other witnesses or evidence remains … or just pay the plaintiff a settlement because defending the claim without evidence would be impossible.
Prepared by: Allison Whitt Meredith / JUD. / (916) 651-4113
5/17/24 13:33:35
**** END ****
SENATE COMMITTEE ON
Senator Anna Caballero, Chair
2023 - 2024 Regular Session
SB 1022 (Skinner) - Enforcement of civil rights
Version: | Policy Vote: |
Urgency: | Mandate: |
Hearing Date: | Consultant: |
Bill Summary:
SB 1022 sets time period for which the director of the Civil Rights Department (CRD) must file group or class civil actions to 7 years of the date of the violation, and establishes tolling periods, as specified.
Fiscal Impact:
- CRD indicates no fiscal impact (Fair Employment and Housing Enforcement and Litigation Fund). According to CRD, each section of this bill would either create cost savings or be cost neutral for CRD to the extent that it would result in the recovery of an unknown amount of litigation costs, including reasonable attorney’s fees, expert witness fees, and other costs to the extent that the department prevails in specified unlawful employment practices cases to the extent the court grants the recovery of such costs.
- Unknown, potentially-significant workload cost pressures to the courts (Trial Court Trust Fund, General Fund) to adjudicate alleged discriminatory practice cases brought by CRD and potentially other actions for which the deadlines would be tolled by this measure, as specified, that otherwise would not be filed under existing law. While the superior courts are not funded on a workload basis, an increase in workload could result in delayed court services and would put pressure on the General Fund to increase the amount appropriated to backfill for trial court operations. For illustrative purposes, the Governor’s 2024-25 state budget proposes $83.1 million ongoing General Fund to continue to backfill the Trial Court Trust Fund for expected revenue declines. However, Judicial Council indicates that given the existing filing parameters, the Judicial Council anticipates that the expanded authority to file in any county to have a minimal impact on the courts.
Background:
California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) governs claims involving workplace harassment, discrimination, and civil rights-related retaliation. Under the FEHA, such claims cannot be filed directly in court. Instead, individuals alleging that they have been harassed, discriminated against, or retaliated against in the workplace must first exhaust their administrative remedies by filing a claim with CRD. FEHA violations generally have a three-year statute of limitations. The statute of limitations may be tolled under specified conditions, such as where the victim was a minor or the identity of the employer was rebutted. Claims for housing discrimination must be brought within one year of the alleged violation.
After the claim is filed with CRD, CRD investigates the claim; it must finish the investigation within one year, or two years for a group or class complaint. If CRD determines that a FEHA violation took place, then the department has discretion to file a civil action in court on behalf of the individual, either individually or as a class complaint. Alternatively, if CRD is unable to determine that a violation took place, or if the complainant requests it at any time, then CRD will provide them with a right-to-sue letter within 150 days. Only upon receipt of the right-to-sue letter may a person proceed to file a civil action in court. Under existing law a person has one year from the date of the right-to-sue letter to commence legal proceedings in court. Current law allows all of these time frames to be tolled during the pendency of certain events.
Proposed Law:
This bill would do all of the following:
- Provide that the director of CRD may file a group or class complaint alleging a violation of the FEHA within a period of 7 years or fewer before the date of the alleged violation.
- Provide that notwithstanding any other tolling or limitations period, the time for a complainant to file a civil action shall be tolled during the period beginning with the filing of a complaint with CRD until either CRD files a civil action or one year after CRD issues a written notice to a complainant that it has closed its investigation without electing to file a complaint, or if the complainant timely appeals within the department the closure of their complaint, written notice to the complainant that it has remained closed following the appeal.
- Modify the time during which the director of CRD’s time frame to bring a FEHA civil action following the filing of a complaint is tolled, to include:
- The amount of time specified in any written agreement between CRD and the respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable timeline;
- The length of time for which the CRD’s investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified; and,
- During a timely appeal with the CRD of the CRD’s closure of the complaint.
- Require the CRD, if it determines, in its discretion, that an individually filed unlawful employment practice complaint relates in whole or in part to a complaint filed in the name of the director or as a group or class complaint for the purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, to issue a right-to-sue notice either in response to a request from the complainant or after the director’s or group or class complaint has been fully and finally disposed of and all civil actions, appeals, or related proceedings have terminated.
- Modify the time during which the CRD’s time frame to issue a right-to-sue notice to an individual complainant is tolled, to include:
- The amount of time specified in any written agreement between CRD and the respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable timeline,
- The length of time for which the CRD’s investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified; and,
- During a timely appeal with the CRD of the CRD’s closure of the complaint.
- Clarify that no complaint in a housing discrimination action may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated.
- Eliminate the requirement that the CRD bring a civil action for housing discrimination in a county in the state in which the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, a county in which the relevant records are maintained and administered, a county in which the aggrieved person would have resided in the housing, or a county in which the defendant resides or maintains its principal office.
Related Legislation:
SB 1137 (Smallwood-Cuevas, 2024) clarifies that FEHA and the Unruh Civil Rights Act prohibit discrimination on the basis of an intersection of characteristics covered by those acts, as well as on the basis of a single characteristic. SB 1137 is pending in this Committee.
SB 807 (Wieckowski, Chapter 278, Statutes of 2021) among other things, modified the statutes of limitations for a person to file a claim with the CRD; authorized the CRD to bring actions in any county in which the CRD has an office or, for class or group claims, in any county in the state; and clarified certain tolling provisions.
AB 9 (Reyes, Chapter 709, Statutes of 2019) extended the statute of limitations for filing a FEHA claim with the CRD from one year to three years.
Staff Comments:
The fiscal impact of SB 1022 to the courts will depend on many unknown factors, including if parties settle matters before the filing of an action and the factors unique to each case. While it is not known how many actions would be filed resulting from the various changes that this measure would make, it generally costs about $8,300 to operate a courtroom for one eight-hour day. Consequently, if reforms proposed by SB 1022 lead to the filing of cases that, combined, take 50 or more hours of court involvement, the cost pressures of this measure to the courts would be significant. As indicated above, while courts are not funded on a workload basis, an increase in workload could result in delayed services and would create pressure to increase the backfill amount appropriated from the General Fund for trial court operations in an amount sufficient to meet the Suspense threshold.
-- END --
Senator Thomas Umberg, Chair
2023-2024 Regular Session
Bill No: SB 1022 (Author:Skinner)
Version: April 1, 2024
Hearing Date: April 9, 2024
Fiscal: Yes
Urgency: No
Consultant: AWM
SUBJECT
Enforcement of civil rights
DIGEST
This bill provides that the director of the Civil Rights Department (CRD) may file a group or class complaint alleging a violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) within a period of 10 years or fewer before the date of the alleged violation, or longer if the court determines the longer window is reasonable, and adds periods during which the CRD’s time frame to issue a right-to-sue notice and an individual’s time frame to sue following the receipt of a right-to-sue notice are tolled.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
California’s FEHA establishes the mechanism by which Californians can seek relief from invidious discrimination in employment and housing. The FEHA requires all potential FEHA plaintiffs to file an administrative complaint with the CRD before proceeding to a civil action. The CRD is tasked with conducting an investigation and may opt to proceed with a suit in the name of the plaintiff; if the CRD elects not to sue in the plaintiff’s name, the plaintiff may file a lawsuit against the employer or housing provider. If the CRD determines that an administrative complaint relates to a class or group of similarly situated individuals, the CRD may also elect to proceed with a class or group claim.
This bill makes a number of changes to the provisions governing the FEHA’s administrative timelines. The most significant of these changes permits the CRD to file a group or class civil action alleging violations that date back 10 years from the date the initial administrative complaint was filed, or for longer than 10 years if a court determines the longer look-back is reasonable. The bill also establishes tolling periods during the period in which the CRD must conduct its investigation and issue a right-to-sue notice, and during which a plaintiff has to file suit after receiving a right-to-sue notice, to include tolling during the pendency of an agreement between the CRD and the defendant, during the time when a plaintiff is appealing the CRD’s denial to pursue a claim, and during the pendency of a class action brought by the CRD that relates to the individual claim. These tolling periods are intended to bring greater efficiency to the claims process and avoid the filing of duplicative lawsuits. The bill also makes other changes to clarify the scope of class actions and provisions of the housing portions of FEHA. The author has agreed to amendments reducing the CRD’s class action statute of limitations to seven years and eliminating the possibility of a court extending the statute of limitations further.
This bill is sponsored by Equal Rights Advocates, Equality California, and Legal Aid at Work, and is supported by 15 organizations, including legal aid, immigrant rights, and LGBTA+ rights organizations. This bill is opposed by 20 organizations, including the California Chamber of Commerce, trade organizations, and business organizations.
PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE LAW
Existing law:
- Establishes the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). (Gov. Code, tit. 2, div. 3, pt. 2.8, §§ 12900 et seq.)
- Declares that:
- It is the public policy of this State that it is necessary to protect and safeguard the right and opportunity of all persons to seek, obtain, and hold employment without discrimination or abridgment on account of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, reproductive health decisionmaking, or military and veteran status.
- It is recognized that the practice of denying employment opportunity and discriminating in the terms of employment for these reasons foments domestic strife and unrest, deprives the state of the fullest utilization of its capacities for development and advancement, and substantially and adversely affects the interests of employees, employers, and the public in general.
- The practice of discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial status, source of income, disability, veteran or military status, or genetic information in housing accommodations is declared to be against public policy.
- It is the purpose of FEHA to provide remedies that will eliminate these discriminatory practices, and FEHA shall be deemed an exercise of the police power of the state for the protection of the welfare, health, and peace of the people of this State. (Gov. Code, § 12920.)
- Establishes the Civil Rights Department (CRD) and the Civil Rights Council (Council) within the CRD to effectuate and enforce FEHA, as specified. (Gov. Code, §§ 12901-12907.)
- Makes it an unlawful employment practice in California, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification or, except where based on applicable security regulations established by the United States or this State, for employers and labor organizations to engage in discrimination and other negative employment actions on the basis of the characteristics listed in 2)(a), subject to certain exemptions. (Gov. Code, § 12940.)
- Sets forth procedures for the prevention and elimination of practices made unlawful under 4), including:
- Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an alleged unlawful practice may file a complaint with the CRD, as specified. (Gov. Code, § 12960.)
- Upon receipt of a complaint alleging facts sufficient to constitute a violation of 4), the CRD must make a prompt investigation of the allegations. (Gov. Code, § 12963.)
- The CRD may bring an action in the name of the CRD and on behalf of the person claiming to be aggrieved, if it determines the circumstances warrant and the parties did not resolve the dispute in the CRD’s internal dispute resolution division. The CRD may file the suit in any county in which the CRD has an office, in a county in which unlawful practices are alleged to have been committed, in the county in which records relevant to the alleged unlawful practices are maintained and administered, in the county in which the person claiming to be aggrieved would have worked or would have had access to public accommodation, but for the alleged unlawful practices, in the county of the defendant's residence or principal office. (Gov. Code, § 12965(a).)
- If the CRD does not file a civil action within 150 days after the filing of a complaint, or the CRD determines earlier that it will not bring a civil action, the CRD shall promptly notify the person claiming to be aggrieved that the CRD shall issue, on request, a right to sue notice. (Gov. Code, § 12965(c).)
- If the person who filed the complaint does not request a notice, the CRD shall issue the notice upon completion of its investigation, which must be no later than one year after the complaint was filed (or two years, for complaints treated as group or class complaints). These time periods are tolled during a mandatory or voluntary dispute resolution proceeding. (Gov. Code, § 12965(c).)
- Upon receipt of a right to sue notice, an aggrieved person may file a civil action in a superior court in any county in which the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, in the county in which the records relevant to the practice are maintained or administered, in the county in which the aggrieved person would have worked or would have had access to the public accommodation but for the alleged unlawful practice, or in the county where the defendant has their residence or personal office, as specified. (Gov. Code, § 12965(c).)
- The aggrieved person may, if the unlawful practice adversely affects a group or class of persons, or raises questions of law similar to a group or class, file the complaint on behalf of and as representative of a group or class. (Gov. Code, § 12961.)
- A court may, at its discretion, award a prevailing plaintiff, including the CRD, reasonable attorney fees and costs; notwithstanding Code of Civil Procedure section 998, a court shall not award a prevailing defendant fees and costs unless the court finds the action was frivolous, unreasonable, or groundless when brought, or the plaintiff continued to litigate after it clearly became so. (Gov. Code, § 12965(c)(6).)
- Provides statutes of limitations for actions brought pursuant to 5), and for those time frames to be extended or tolled for certain periods, including:
- The statute of limitations for an individual to file a complaint with the CRD is one year for a violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act, two years for specified wage violations, three years for specified sexual harassment and FEHA violations, and up to ten years for a victim of human trafficking. (Gov. Code, § 12960(e).)
- The limitations window for filing a complaint with CRD is extended for specified reasons, including for 90 days if the person allegedly aggrieved first obtained knowledge of the facts during that 90-day period; for up to one year if the person needs to make a substitute identification of an actual employer; and for up to one year after the aggrieved person attains the age of minority. (Gov. Code, § 12960(e)(6).)
- The one-year window in which a person may bring a civil action following the CRD’s issuance of a right to sue notice is tolled when the aggrieved person has also filed a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and it conducts its own investigation, as specified. (Gov. Code, § 12965(f).)
- For suits filed by the CRD, the filing deadlines are tolled during a mandatory or voluntary dispute resolution conducted by the CRD’s dispute resolution division. (Gov. Code, § 12965(a).)
- Authorizes, where an unlawful practice alleged in a verified complaint under 5) that adversely affects a group or class of persons in a similar manner or raises questions of law common to a group or class, the aggrieved individual or the CRD to file the complaint on behalf of and as representative of such group or class. (Gov. Code, § 12961(a).)
- The CRD may investigate a complaint as a group or class complaint. (Gov. Code, § 12961(b).)
- The director of the CRD shall communicate in writing its determination to treat a complaint as a group or class within one year of the filing of the complaint to each person or entity alleged in the complaint to have committed the unlawful practice. (Gov. Code, § 12961(c).)
- The CRD may bring a group or class action in any county in the state. (Gov. Code, § 12965(a)(4).)
- Establishes procedures for the prevention and elimination of discrimination in housing under FEHA which are generally similar to those for unlawful employment practices, including permitting the Attorney General or the director of the CRD to make, sign, and file complaints citing practices that appear to relate to housing discrimination, as specified. (Gov. Code, § 12980.)
- States that no complaint for housing discrimination under FEHA may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated. (Gov. Code, § 12980(b).)
- Provides that, when CRD brings a housing complaint in the public interest, the civil action shall be filed in any county in the state where the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, in the county in which the records relevant to that practice are maintained or administered, or the county in which the aggrieved person would have resided in the housing accommodation. (Gov. Code, § 12981.)
This bill:
- Defines, within FEHA, “group or class complaint” as including any complaint alleging a pattern or practice; and states that this definition is declarative of, and clarifies, existing law.
- Provides that a complaint filed by the director of CRD, or the director’s authorized representative, or an unlawful employment practices complaint treated by the director or the director’s representative, as a group or class complaint may allege any violation of FEHA that occurred within a period of 10 years or fewer before the date the complaint was filed, or more than 10 years before the complaint was filed if a court determines that the longer period is reasonable.
- Modifies the time during which an individual’s time frame to bring a FEHA action following the filing of a complaint is tolled, to run until either (1) when CRD files a civil action for the alleged violation, or (2) one year after CRD issues either the written notice that the CRD is not electing to file a lawsuit on behalf of the complainant or, if the complainant timely appeals the CRD’s closure of their complaint, written notice that the complaint remains closed following the appeal. Under the existing language of the statute, the new tolling—during the complainant’s appeal of the CRD’s closure of the case—would apply retroactively.
- Modifies the time during which the director of CRD’s time frame to bring a FEHA civil action following the filing of a complaint is tolled, to include:
- The amount of time specified in any written agreement between CRD and the respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable timeline.
- The length of time for which the CRD’s investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified.
- During a timely appeal with the CRD of the CRD’s closure of the complaint.
- Requires the CRD, if it determines, in its discretion, that an individually filed unlawful employment practice complaint relates in whole or in part to a complaint filed in the name of the director or as a group or class complaint for the purposes of investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action, to issue a right-to-sue notice either in response to a request from the complainant or after the director’s or group or class complaint has been fully and finally disposed of and all civil actions, appeals, or related proceedings have terminated.
- Modifies the time during which the CRD’s time frame to issue a right-to-sue notice to an individual complainant is tolled, to include:
- The amount of time specified in any written agreement between CRD and the respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable timeline.
- The length of time for which the CRD’s investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel, as specified.
- During a timely appeal with the CRD of the CRD’s closure of the complaint.
- Clarifies that no complaint in a housing discrimination action may be filed after the expiration of one year from the date upon which the alleged violation occurred or terminated, and removes this term from the subdivision relating to housing discrimination actions filed by the Attorney General or the director of the CRD.
- Eliminates the requirement that the CRD bring a civil action for housing discrimination in a county in the state in which the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, a county in which the relevant records are maintained and administered, a county in which the aggrieved person would have resided in the housing, or a county in which the defendant resides or maintains its principal office.
COMMENTS
- Author’s comment
According to the author:
The California Civil Rights Department (“CRD”) is the institutional centerpiece of California’s defense against discrimination, harassment, and other civil rights violations. Each year, CRD serves the public interest by investigating thousands of complaints of civil rights violations, mediating and settling many of those complaints, and prosecuting high-impact civil actions for the purposes of protecting the rights of a large number of Californians. SB 1022 would clarify the law that allows the CRD to effectively investigate and prosecute violations of Californians’ civil rights by ensuring that courts can address systemic abuses in the workplace that stretch back for years and give appropriate relief to victims. SB 1022 empowers CRD to effectively address systemic discriminatory practices impacting racialized, gender, LGBTQ+, and other forms of workplace, housing and other discrimination.
2. The FEHA complaint and investigation process
California’s FEHA governs claims involving workplace harassment, discrimination, and civil rights-related retaliation.[1] Under the FEHA, such claims cannot be filed directly in court. Instead, workers alleging that they have been harassed, discriminated against, or retaliated against in the workplace must first exhaust their administrative remedies by filing a claim with CRD.[2] Aggrieved persons have from one year to ten years after the alleged violation to file a claim, depending on the nature of the claim.[3] FEHA violations and certain sexual harassment violations have a three-year statute of limitations; [4] the three-year window was put in place in 2021, when it was extended from one year.[5] The statute of limitations may be tolled under specified conditions, such as where the victim was a minor or the identity of the employer was rebutted.[6] Claims for housing discrimination must be brought within one year of the alleged violation.[7]
After the claim is filed with CRD, CRD investigates the claim; it must finish the investigation within one year, or two years for a group or class complaint.[8] If CRD determines that a FEHA violation took place, then the department has discretion to file a civil action in court on behalf of the worker, either individually or as a class complaint.[9] Alternatively, if CRD is unable to determine that a violation took place, or if the worker requests it at any time, then the department will provide the worker with a right-to-sue letter.[10] Only upon receipt of the right-to-sue letter may the worker proceed to file a civil action in court.[11] The worker has one year from the date of the right-to-sue letter to do so.[12]
3. The dispute over CRD’s statute of limitation for FEHA “pattern and practice” class actions
In 2021, after a two-year investigation, the CRD filed a class action against Activision Blizzard for alleged unlawful employment practices on the basis of sex under FEHA and the California Equal Pay Act.[13] CRD alleged that “women across the company are assigned to lower paid and lower opportunity levels… receive lower starting pay and also earn less than male employees for substantially similar work,” and were promoted more slowly and terminated more quickly than their male counterparts.[14] CRD also alleged that Activision Blizzard “fostered a pervasive ‘frat boy’ workplace culture,” in which “[m]ale employees proudly come into work hungover, play video games for long periods of time during work while delegating their responsibilities to female employees, engage in banter about their sexual encounters, and talk openly about rape.”[15] Female employees had to “continually fend off unwanted sexual comments and advances by their male co-workers and supervisors and being groped” at various company events.[16]
In 2022, after approximately three years of investigation, CRD filed a class action complaint against Tesla for alleged unlawful employment practices on the basis of race under FEHA. The complaint alleged that Black and/or African American workers were underrepresented in Tesla’s leadership ranks and racist harassment was rampant.[17] According to the complaint:
As early as 2012, Black and/or African American Tesla workers have complained that Tesla production leads, supervisors, and managers constantly use the n-word and other racial slurs to refer to Black workers. They have complained that swastikas, “KKK,” the n-word, and other racist writings are etched onto walls of restrooms, restroom stalls, lunch tables, and even factory machinery. They have complained that Black and/or African American workers are assigned to more physically demanding posts and the lowest-level contract roles, paid less, and more often terminated from employment than other workers.[18]
The complaint further stated that Tesla “turned, and continued to turn, a blind eye to years of complaints from Black workers who protest the commonplace use of racial slurs on the assembly line,” and that Tesla’s workplace investigations did not comply with legal requirements.[19]
In both suits, CRD sought to hold the companies liable for the violations that occurred during the companies’ entire “pattern or practice” of wrongdoing and argued that CRD is not bound by FEHA’s “administrative statute of limitations,” which requires an administrative complaint to be filed with the CRD within a certain time of the violation.[20] (The administrative statute of limitations was changed from one year to three years in 2021.)[21] Instead, CRD argued that the statute authorizing it to bring class or group claims permits it to bring such claims dating back as far as the pattern or practice of the violations could be proven. Activision and Tesla argued that CRD is, in fact, bound by the same administrative statute of limitations as an individual plaintiff. In both cases, the judges sided with the defendant and limited the scope of the CRD’s actions to one year prior to when CRD commenced its investigation.
Following those rulings, the CRD entered into a consent decree with Activision.[22] Activision agreed to pay up to $45,750,000 to a covered class of female employees that ran from October 12, 2015, until December 31, 2020, and another $9,125,000 in attorney fees and costs; and to injunctive relief requiring Activision to take certain steps to avoid violations going forward.[23]
The Tesla suit is ongoing, with CRD able to prosecute class claims dating back to June 19, 2018.[24]
4. This bill adds an express administrative statute of limitations for CRD group or class action claims
To avoid further litigation or confusion over how far the CRD may look back in a group or class action claim, this bill adds an express administrative statute of limitations for those claims. Specifically, this bill gives CRD, for actions filed as group or class claims, a minimum of 10 years to look back from the date the administrative complaint was filed, or longer if the court determines that a longer window is reasonable. The language allowing a judge to determine a longer lookback window comes from one line of federal district court cases ruling that the EEOC does not have a statute of limitations for “pattern and practice” class actions filed under Title VII.[25]
Statutes of limitations have two related purposes: to “protect defendants from the stale claims of dilatory plaintiffs” and to “stimulate plaintiffs to assert fresh claims against defendants in a diligent fashion.”[26] Nevertheless, a statute of limitations generally creates a hard line, meaning that “a cause of action brought by a plaintiff outside such period is barred, even if the [plaintiff was] diligent.”[27] Statutes of limitations thus represent a tension in two “equally strong” policy interests: repose on the one hand, and allowing claims to be disposed of on the merits on the other.[28]
According to the author, a longer lookback is appropriate in the rare cases where CRD brings a class action on the basis of a longstanding practice of prohibited employment practices. Under this theory, it would be arbitrary to cut off recovery at three years from the date of the filing of the administrative complaint, and CRD should be able to vindicate the rights of a broader scope of similarly situated employees. The bill’s opponents argue that the 10-year statute of limitations, with the possibility of a further extension from the court, will disadvantage employers who have to defend against actions that took place years before.
The author has agreed to amend the bill to reduce the CRD’s class action statute of limitations to seven years, and to eliminate the provision allowing a court to grant a longer lookback.
5. This bill adds events that toll certain FEHA deadlines
FEHA has several time-sensitive requirements after an administrative complaint has been filed. There’s the one-year or two-year time window for CRD to investigate the claim; the 150-day window before CRD has to issue a right-to-sue notice to the claimant upon request; the mandate that CRD issue a right-to-sue notice to the claimant when its investigation is complete and CRD declines to bring a case on behalf of the claimant; and the one-year window for a claimant to bring a civil action following the issuance of a right-to-sue notice. Current law allows all of these time frames to be tolled during the pendency of certain events.
The bill adds new events that toll some of the administrative deadlines within the FEHA process, with the goal of streamlining the process and avoiding duplicative litigation.
First, the bill tolls the complainant’s one-year window to file a civil action following the issuance of a right-to-sue notice for the duration of a claimant’s timely appeal of the CRD’s decision to close the case. Under the current set of guidelines, even if an appeal were successful, the CRD would not be able to proceed with a suit on behalf of the complainant—the combination of the investigation time limit and the filing time limit strip the CRD of the ability to do so. This change, along with the change below that tolls the CRD’s investigation time window during the pendency of an appeal, are therefore intended to allow the CRD to file a civil action on behalf of a complainant if the appeal is successful.
Next, the bill adds events that toll the CRD’s one- or two-year window to conduct an investigation following the filing of an administrative complaint. These events are:
- For the amount of time specified in any written agreement between the CRD and a respondent executed before the expiration of the applicable deadline.
- For the length of time for which the CRD’s investigation is extended due to the pendency of a petition to compel the respondent to provide information.
- During a timely appeal within the CRD of the closure of the complaint.
Tolling the investigation window for a period stipulated to by the respondent, or during the pendency of a petition to compel information from an uncooperative respondent, is intended to give the CRD more space to complete an investigation without having to rush to file a civil action.
The bill also adds, to the list of events that toll the CRD’s obligation to issue a right-to-sue notice at the end of an investigation, the same three events that toll the CRD’s investigation window. Adding these same three events ensures that the CRD’s obligations are in harmony with one another, e.g., by not requiring the CRD to issue a right-to-sue notice while its investigation is ongoing.
Finally, the bill permits the CRD to hold off on issuing a right-to-sue notice in a case where the CRD determines that a complaint is related to an ongoing complaint filed by the CRD as a group or class complaint for purposes of an investigation, conciliation, mediation, or civil action. Under this change, the CRD would still have to issue a right-to-sue notice after 150 days to a complainant who requests the notice, but CRD would not be required to issue the notice to a non-requesting complainant until the CRD’s group or class complaint has been fully and finally disposed of. This provision is intended to avoid duplicative litigation while a class claim is pending: if the CRD is required to issue right-to-sue notices to individual claimants who are also the members of a pending class action, the individuals would then have to file individual lawsuits within one year of receiving the notice or lose their claims. By allowing CRD to hold off on issuing the notices until the end of the class, or until the individual requests the notice, CRD will be able to limit the number of placeholder suits filed.
6. This bill makes additional changes to the FEHA procedures
In addition to the changes above, the bill makes a number of smaller modifications to the FEHA procedural statutes. These include:
- Defining “group or class complaint” to include any complaint alleging a pattern or practice, and stating that this definition is declarative of, and clarifies, existing law. This appears uncontroversial.
- Moving a provision in the housing discrimination procedural statute that requires a complaint to be filed no more than one year from the expiration of the date of the alleged violation occurred into the subdivision for individual claims. According to stakeholders, this limitation has always been understood to apply to individual claims, even though it is housed in the subdivision addressing actions filed by the Attorney General or CRD. The intent is to keep the individual statute of limitations as-is.
- Removing the venue limitations for housing actions filed by the CRD. Similar changes were made to the venue provisions in the employment context in SB 807 (Wieckowski, Ch. 278, Stats. 2021).
7. Amendments
As discussed in Part 4, the author has agreed to amendments to reduce the CRD’s statute of limitations for class or group actions. The amendments are as follows, subject to any nonsubstantive changes the Office of Legislative Counsel may make:
Amendment 1
At page 12, in line 20, replace “10” with “seven”.
Amendment 2
At page 12, in line 21, add “.” after “filed” and strike the remainder of lines 21-23.
8. Arguments in support
According to the sponsors of the bill:
Based on our experiences working closely with clients and the CRD, we know firsthand how impactful the prosecutorial arm of the agency can be in achieving meaningful results for claimants. The ability of the Department to address and correct discriminatory policy and practice at large employers, for example, as well as the ability to deliver relief to groups of harmed workers, without the formal constraints of civil class actions, are incredibly important tools. Just last year, CRD reached a $54 million settlement for workers suffering gender discrimination and equal pay violations at a Santa Monica video game company, which will provide relief to women who were employees or contract workers in California between October 12, 2015 and December 31, 2020.
However, CRD remains limited in its capacity to thoroughly and effectively prosecute systemic discrimination complaints. Although many complaints initiated by CRD, as well as complaints affecting a class or group, involve discriminatory practices that go back years, the department must adhere to the same statute of limitations as an individual claimant–one year. Similarly, CRD must complete their investigations of these claims within one year, despite the reality that information gathering in these investigations, particularly for group/class complaints, takes considerable time. This one-year investigation deadline is inadequate for a thorough investigation of claims, and leads to administrative inefficiency within the department–when individuals file complaints that are already the subject of ongoing CRD group/class investigations, they cannot be easily aggregated into ongoing investigations but rather must complete on their own individual timelines.
SB 1022 would address these concerns by allowing CRD to more fully rectify long-running civil rights violations and provide redress to as many victims as possible by clarifying that certain deadlines applicable to individual complainants do not apply to CRD actions to remedy systemic discrimination. This change would align California law with federal interpretations of the timelines applicable to CRD’s counterpart agency, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)–that it is not subject to Title VII’s deadlines for individual workers. Further, SB 1022 would allow CRD to pause investigations of administrative complaints that may be resolved by actions CRD is already pursuing, so that thorough investigations can occur to resolve the maximum number of claims pertaining to the same discriminatory practices.
In addition, SB 1022 would clarify that the deadlines for CRD to complete its investigation and file a civil action may be tolled by voluntary agreement, a well-recognized tool to facilitate settlement. Finally, it will remedy a conflict in FEHA created by a recent amendment to the statute regarding venue for CRD civil actions alleging housing discrimination.
9. Arguments in opposition
According to the coalition of organizations in opposition:
Not only do statutes of limitations ensure memories and evidence are fresh, but they also ensure illegal behavior is promptly reported and vanquished. This is why, for most civil claims, the statute of limitations will be between two and five years. For example, most personal injury lawsuits have a two-year statute of limitations. For contract cases, it varies from two-to-four years. For property damage, it is generally three years. For claims against a government entity, claims must be filed within in as little as six months. The default statute of limitations for laws without a specified statute of limitation is three years. See Code of Civil Procedure Sections 312, 338, 345. State entities filing claims are subject to these statutes of limitations as well. See, e.g., People v. Overstock.com, Inc. (2017) 12 Cal. App. 5th 1064, 1076-1078 (applying UCL four-year statute of limitations to case brought by the Attorney General); Code of Civil Procedure Section 345 (“The limitations prescribed in this chapter apply to actions brought in the name of the state or county or for the benefit of the state or county, in the same manner as to actions by private parties.”)
It is unclear why the CRD requires such a significant statute of limitations. For example, this proposed statute of limitations is more than three times the statute of limitations presently afforded to an individual employee or CRD to bring an action for an alleged unlawful employment practice.
A ten-year period undermines the very purpose of a statute of limitations. The evidence available to confirm or refute a claim will shrink. Memories will fade. Former employees will change jobs, retire, or, in some cases, pass on. The very methods by which we maintain data may become inaccessible or unavailable. As the available information about an event shrinks the claim becomes harder to defend. The defendant will be forced to assess what is the better option – pay the expensive attorney’s fees to litigate a claim where a plaintiff claims perfect memory and no other witnesses or evidence remains … or just pay the plaintiff a settlement because defending the claim without evidence would be impossible.
It is also concerning that a court may extend that statute of limitations any time it decides that it is “reasonable” to do so. Existing doctrines used to look back further than an existing statute of limitations are limited and grounded in principles like situations where someone did not become aware of conduct until later. Under this language, there is no reason why the CRD shouldn’t ask for an extended liability period for every single case. There is nothing to lose by doing so. Every defendant will therefore also be required to spend time and money litigating this side issue.
SUPPORT
Equal Rights Advocates (co-sponsor)
Equality California (co-sponsor)
Legal Aid at Work (co-sponsor)
APLA Health
California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
California Work & Family Coalition
Center for Immigrant Protection – the Asylum Project and Parivar Bay Area
Central California LGBTQ+ Collaborative
Courage California
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant
National Asian Pacific American Families Against Substance Abuse
Public Counsel
San Joaquin Pride Center
Solano Pride Center
The Transgender District, San Francisco
Transgender Health & Wellness Center
Transgender Resource, Advocacy and Network Service
Youth Leadership Institute
OPPOSITION
Acclamation Insurance Management Services
Allied Managed Care
California Association of Joint Powers Authorities
California Association of Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors National Association
California Association of Winegrape Growers
California Chamber of Commerce
California Employment Law Council
California Farm Bureau
California Financial Services Association
California league of Food Producers
California Retailers Association
California State Council for the Society of Human Resource Management
Civil Justice Association of California
Coalition of Small and Disabled Veteran Businesses
Construction Employers’ Association
Family Business Association of California
Flasher Barricade Association
Housing Contractors of California
Public Risk Innovation, Solution, and Management
Western Electrical Contractors Association
RELATED LEGISLATION
Pending Legislation: SB 1137 (Smallwood-Cuevas, 2024) clarifies that FEHA and the Unruh Civil Rights Act prohibit discrimination on the basis of an intersection of characteristics covered by those acts, as well as on the basis of a single characteristic. SB 1137 is set to be heard in this Committee on the same day as SB 1022.
Prior Legislation:
SB 807 (Wieckowski, Ch. 278, Stats. 2021) among other things, modified the statutes of limitations for a person to file a claim with the CRD; authorized the CRD to bring actions in any county in which the CRD has an office or, for class or group claims, in any county in the state; and clarified certain tolling provisions.
AB 9 (Reyes, Ch. 709, Stats. 2019) extended the statute of limitations for filing a FEHA claim with the CRD from one year to three years.
**************
Gov.Code, § 12940. ↑
Id., §§ 12965, 12980 ↑
Id., § 12960(e). ↑
Id., § 12960. ↑
SB 807 (Wieckowski, Ch. 278, Stats. 2021). ↑
Gov. Code, § 12960. ↑
Id., § 12980. ↑
Id., § 12965. ↑
Id., §§ 12960, 12961. ↑
Id., § 12965(c). ↑
Id., § 12960(f). ↑
Ibid. ↑
See Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., First Amended Complaint (Aug. 23, 2021), Case No. 21STCV26571. The Department of Fair Employment and Housing changed its name to CRD in 2022. (See SB 189 (Budget Committee, Ch. 48, Stats. 2022).) ↑
Id. at pp. 3-4. ↑
Id. at p. 4. ↑
Id. at pp. 4-5. ↑
See Department of Fair Housing and Employment v. Tesla, Inc., Complaint (Feb. 9, 2022), Cse No. 22CV006830, p. 4. ↑
Ibid. ↑
Id. at p. 5. ↑
See Gov. Code, § 12960. ↑
SB 807 (Wieckowski, Ch. 278, Stats. 2021). ↑
See California Civil Rights Department v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., Order on Consent Decree (Jan. 17, 2024), Case No. 21STCV26571, p. 3. ↑
Id. at pp. 9, 17-19. ↑
See Department of Fair Housing and Employment v. Tesla, Inc., Order re: Ruling on Submitted Matter (Nov. 18, 2022), Case No. 22CV006830, p. 5. ↑
See, e.g., E.E.O.C. v. Mitsubishi Motor Mfg. of America, Inc. (C.D.Ill. 1998) 990 F.Supp. 1059, 1087-1088 (ruling that, in the absence of a statute of limitations for EEOC pattern and practice cases, “the solution to this problem is to let the evidence of a pattern determine the relevant ‘limits’ for the lawsuit.”). There is another line of federal district court cases ruling that the EEOC’s pattern and practice cases are subject to the same statute of limitations that applies to the EEOC’s cases brought on behalf of individuals: no more than 300 days from when the administrative complaint was filed. (See, e.g., U.S. E.E.O.C. v. Global Horizons, Inc. (D. Hawai’i, 2012) 904 F.Supp.2d 1074, 1092.) Surprisingly, no federal Court of Appeals has weighed in on this issue, so there is no binding precedent one way or the other. ↑
Norgart v. Upjohn Co. (1999) 21 Cal.4th 383, 395. ↑
Ibid. ↑
Ibid. ↑
Discussed in Hearing
Senate Floor
Assembly Floor
Assembly Floor
Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary
Senate Floor
Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):