SB 1461: State of emergency and local emergency: landslide.
- Session Year: 2023-2024
- House: Senate
- Latest Version Date: 2024-05-16
Current Status:
Failed
(2024-08-31: Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry.)
Introduced
In Committee
First Chamber
In Committee
Second Chamber
Enacted
What does this bill do?
This bill adds landslides to the official list of events that can justify a state or local emergency in California, allowing the governor and local officials to use emergency powers when landslides threaten people or property.
The summary is provided by generative AI which can make mistakes. For original language, please view the details in the table below.
Existing law, the California Emergency Services Act, authorizes the Governor to declare a state of emergency, and local officials and local governments to declare a local emergency, when specified conditions of disaster or extreme peril to the safety of persons and property exist, and authorizes the Governor or the appropriate local government to exercise certain powers in response to that emergency. Existing law defines the term state of emergency and local emergency to mean a duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state caused by, among other things, fire, storm, riot, or cyberterrorism.
This bill would additionally include a landslide, as defined, landslide among those causes of the conditions constituting a state of emergency or local emergency.
Existing law, the California Emergency Services Act, authorizes the Governor to declare a state of emergency, and local officials and local governments to declare a local emergency, when specified conditions of disaster or extreme peril to the safety of persons and property exist, and authorizes the Governor or the appropriate local government to exercise certain powers in response to that emergency. Existing law defines the term state of emergency and local emergency to mean a duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state caused by, among other things, fire, storm, riot, or cyberterrorism.
This bill would additionally include a landslide, as defined, among those conditions constituting a state of emergency or local emergency.
The Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act covers certain single-use packaging and plastic single-use food serviceware, as provided. As part of its comprehensive statutory scheme, the act requires the department to conduct, on or before July 1, 2025, and publish on its internet website a characterization study of covered material categories that are disposed of in California landfills. This bill would extend the date that the department has to complete that characterization study to July 30, 2025.Existing law prohibits a person from offering for sale, selling, distributing, or importing into the state any product or packaging for which a deceptive or misleading claim about the recyclability of the product or packaging is made. Existing law provides that a product or packaging that displays a chasing arrows symbol, among other symbols, statements, or directions, is deemed to be a deceptive or misleading claim unless the product or packaging is considered recyclable pursuant to statewide recyclability criteria and is of a material type and form that routinely becomes feedstock used in the production of new products or packaging, except as provided.This bill would make nonsubstantive changes to those environmental advertising provisions.The Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act covers certain single-use packaging and plastic single-use food serviceware, as provided. As part of its comprehensive statutory scheme, the act requires the department to conduct, on or before July 1, 2025, and publish on its internet website a characterization study of covered material categories that are disposed of in California landfills.
This bill would extend the date that the department has to complete that characterization study to July 30, 2025.
Existing law prohibits a person from offering for sale, selling, distributing, or importing into the state any product or packaging for which a deceptive or misleading claim about the recyclability of the product or packaging is made. Existing law provides that a product or packaging that displays a chasing arrows symbol, among other symbols, statements, or directions, is deemed to be a deceptive or misleading claim unless the product or packaging is considered recyclable pursuant to statewide recyclability criteria and is of a material type and form that routinely becomes feedstock used in the production of new products or packaging, except as provided.
This bill would make nonsubstantive changes to those environmental advertising provisions.
Three conditions or degrees of emergency are established by this chapter:
(a)State of war emergency means the condition that exists immediately, with or without a proclamation thereof by the Governor, whenever this state or nation is attacked by an enemy of the United States, or upon receipt by the state of a warning from the federal government indicating that an enemy attack is probable or imminent.
(b)State of emergency means the duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state caused by conditions such as air pollution, fire, flood, storm, landslide, epidemic, riot, drought, cyberterrorism, sudden and severe energy shortage, electromagnetic pulse attack, plant or animal infestation or disease, the Governors warning of an earthquake or volcanic prediction, or an earthquake, or other conditions, other than conditions resulting from a labor controversy or conditions causing a state of war emergency, which, by reason of their magnitude, are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of any single county, city and county, or city and require the combined forces of a mutual aid region or regions to combat, or with respect to regulated energy utilities, a sudden and severe energy shortage requires extraordinary measures beyond the authority vested in the Public Utilities Commission.
(c)(1)Local emergency means the duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the territorial limits of a county, city and county, or city, caused by conditions such as air pollution, fire, flood, storm, landslide, epidemic, riot, drought, cyberterrorism, sudden and severe energy shortage, deenergization event, electromagnetic pulse attack, plant or animal infestation or disease, the Governors warning of an earthquake or volcanic prediction, or an earthquake, or other conditions, other than conditions resulting from a labor controversy, which are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of that political subdivision and require the combined forces of other political subdivisions to combat, or with respect to regulated energy utilities, a sudden and severe energy shortage or deenergization event that requires extraordinary measures beyond the authority vested in the Public Utilities Commission.
(2)A local emergency proclaimed as the result of a deenergization event does not trigger the electric utility obligations set forth in Public Utilities Commission Decision 19-07-015 or its successor decisions as related to deenergization events. A local emergency proclaimed as the result of a deenergization event does not alter the electric utilities Public Utilities Commission-approved cost-recovery mechanisms for their own costs associated with deenergization events.
SEC. 2.Section 8558.5 is added to the Government Code, to read:8558.5.Landslide means the movement of a mass of rock, debris, or earth down a slope under the direct influence of gravity that travels at a speed of at least one inch per year. REVISIONS: HeadingLine 2.Three conditions or degrees of emergency are established by this chapter:
(a)State of war emergency means the condition that exists immediately, with or without a proclamation thereof by the Governor, whenever this state or nation is attacked by an enemy of the United States, or upon receipt by the state of a warning from the federal government indicating that an enemy attack is probable or imminent.
(b)State of emergency means the duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state caused by conditions such as air pollution, fire, flood, storm, landslide, epidemic, riot, drought, cyberterrorism, sudden and severe energy shortage, electromagnetic pulse attack, plant or animal infestation or disease, the Governors warning of an earthquake or volcanic prediction, or an earthquake, or other conditions, other than conditions resulting from a labor controversy or conditions causing a state of war emergency, which, by reason of their magnitude, are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of any single county, city and county, or city and require the combined forces of a mutual aid region or regions to combat, or with respect to regulated energy utilities, a sudden and severe energy shortage requires extraordinary measures beyond the authority vested in the Public Utilities Commission.
(c)(1)Local emergency means the duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the territorial limits of a county, city and county, or city, caused by conditions such as air pollution, fire, flood, storm, landslide, epidemic, riot, drought, cyberterrorism, sudden and severe energy shortage, deenergization event, electromagnetic pulse attack, plant or animal infestation or disease, the Governors warning of an earthquake or volcanic prediction, or an earthquake, or other conditions, other than conditions resulting from a labor controversy, which are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of that political subdivision and require the combined forces of other political subdivisions to combat, or with respect to regulated energy utilities, a sudden and severe energy shortage or deenergization event that requires extraordinary measures beyond the authority vested in the Public Utilities Commission.
(2)A local emergency proclaimed as the result of a deenergization event does not trigger the electric utility obligations set forth in Public Utilities Commission Decision 19-07-015 or its successor decisions as related to deenergization events. A local emergency proclaimed as the result of a deenergization event does not alter the electric utilities Public Utilities Commission-approved cost-recovery mechanisms for their own costs associated with deenergization events.
SEC. 2.Section 8558.5 is added to the Government Code, to read:8558.5.Landslide means the movement of a mass of rock, debris, or earth down a slope under the direct influence of gravity that travels at a speed of at least one inch per year.
All matter omitted in this version of the bill appears in the bill as introduced in the Senate, February 16, 2024. (JR11)The department shall do all of the following:
(a)(1)By July 1, 2024, the department shall establish and post on its internet website a list of covered material categories. The department may consider material types and forms referenced in waste characterization studies or material characterization studies for determining the categories.
(2)The department shall conduct and publish on its internet website a the characterization study of covered material categories that are disposed of in California landfills. The departments activities pursuant to this paragraph, including the departments determination of the appropriate facilities to include in the study, are exempt from Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(3)(A)For the departments first material characterization study conducted pursuant to paragraph (2), which the department shall complete on or before July 1, 30, 2025, the department shall conduct disposal-based characterization studies to determine the approximate amount of covered material disposed of in California landfills.
(B)The department shall, on or before January 1, 2024, report to the Legislature in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code on the status of material types relative to the requirements in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 42355.51. When updating information pursuant to clause (ii) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 42355.51, the department may identify materials that are trending toward meeting the requirements in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 42355.51 and measurable increase of statewide collection and sorting rates through either statewide recycling programs or alternative programs, such as take-back systems, and for which the continued increase in the collection, sorting, and viable responsible end market development the department determines will be disrupted by a loss of a recyclable designation. Those material types and forms shall be considered recyclable in the state and may be labeled as recyclable, notwithstanding subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 42355.51, so long as the material types and forms satisfy subparagraphs (A) to (D), inclusive, of paragraph (3) of subdivision (d) of Section 42355.51 and until the material types and forms are a part of, and in compliance with, a program described in paragraph (6) of subdivision (d) of Section 42355.51.
(4)The department shall update the material characterization study required pursuant to this subdivision in 2028, 2030, 2032, and at least every four years thereafter.
(5)Notwithstanding paragraphs (2) and (3), the department may publish additional information that was not available at the time of the most recent periodic material characterization study regarding the appropriate characterization of material types and forms.
(6)For purposes of studying a representative sample of material types and forms in the state, within 90 calendar days of a department request, a transfer, processing, or recycling facility shall allow for periodic sampling conducted by a designated representative of the department on a mutually agreed upon date and time. The department shall not require a periodic sampling of a transfer, processing, or recycling facility if that facility was sampled during the previous 24 months.
(7)For each material characterization study conducted pursuant to this subdivision, the department shall publish on its internet website the preliminary findings of the study and conduct a public meeting to present the preliminary findings and receive public comments. The public meeting shall occur at least 30 calendar days after the department publishes the preliminary findings. After receiving and considering public comments, and within 60 calendar days of the public meeting, the department shall finalize and publish on its internet website the findings of the study.
(b)(1)By January 1, 2026, the department shall calculate and publish on its internet website the current recycling rates being achieved in the state for each covered material category. These recycling rates shall be deemed to meet the description in subdivision (g) of Section 11340.9 of the Government Code and may be filed by the Office of Administrative Law, at the request of the department, pursuant to Section 11343.8 of the Government Code.
(2)In determining a recycling rate, the department may consider data gathered pursuant to any of the following, including any amendments thereto:
(A)Chapter 746 of the Statutes of 2015.
(B)Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 42370).
(C)Chapter 395 of the Statutes of 2016.
(D)Chapter 5.5 (commencing with Section 42300).
(E)Division 12.1 (commencing with Section 14500).
(F)Chapter 5.7. (commencing with Section 42355).
(G)Data voluntarily provided by local jurisdictions.
(H)Data and information received from producers.
(I)Any other relevant data and information received by the department.
(c)By January 1, 2024, the department shall publish on its internet website a list of covered material categories that are, based on available collection and processing infrastructure and recycling markets, deemed recyclable as of January 1, 2024. Covered material is deemed recyclable if it meets the requirements of Section 17989.2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, as that section existed on January 1, 2023, and Section 42355.51. The list shall include covered material categories identified by the department and considered recyclable pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 42355.51.
(d)By January 1, 2024, the department shall create and post on its internet website a list of covered material categories that are deemed compostable as of January 1, 2024. Covered material is deemed compostable if it meets the requirements to be labeled as compostable pursuant to Chapter 5.7 (commencing with Section 42355).
(e)The department shall determine a process for updating the lists created pursuant to subdivisions (c) and (d) to either add covered material categories that are deemed to meet all of the criteria in either subdivision (c) or (d) or remove covered material categories if they can no longer be deemed recyclable or compostable pursuant to subdivision (c) or (d). As part of the process, the department shall update the list at least annually until January 1, 2032. After January 1, 2032, the department shall regularly, but no less than once every two years, evaluate the list to determine if it is still accurate and update it as needed. Covered material categories deemed to be recyclable or compostable as of January 1, 2032, and listed pursuant to subdivision (c) or (d) shall be deemed to be compliant with subdivision (b) of Section 42050 until and unless the department determines that the covered material category no longer meets the requirements of subdivision (c) or (d).
(f)(1)The department shall determine a process for updating the rates published pursuant to subdivision (b). The department shall update the list at least every two years and shall regularly, but no less than once every two years, evaluate the list of rates to determine whether the rates are still accurate. After evaluation, the department may amend the list to remove, add, or change rates. The department shall post any updates to the list on its internet website.
(2)A producer may demonstrate compliance with the rates in subdivision (c) of Section 42050 by submitting to the department evidence that the particular type of covered material meets the applicable recycling rate by reference to a recycling rate on the departments list or through another mechanism approved by the department.
(3)A producer that seeks to have a rate included or changed on the list, or a covered material category added to the list, may be required by the department to submit data for purposes of the departments determination of the rate to include on the list or the appropriateness of adding the category.
(4)Publication of and updates made to the list pursuant to this subdivision are exempt from Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
SEC. 2.Section 42355.51 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:42355.51.(a)A person shall not offer for sale, sell, distribute, or import into the state any a product or packaging for which a deceptive or misleading claim about the recyclability of the product or packaging is made.
(b)(1)Subject to paragraph (2), a product or packaging that displays a chasing arrows symbol, a chasing arrows symbol surrounding a resin identification code, or any other symbol or statement indicating the product or packaging is recyclable, or otherwise directing the consumer to recycle the product or packaging, is deemed to be a deceptive or misleading claim pursuant to this section and Section 17580.5 of the Business and Professions Code unless the product or packaging is considered recyclable in the state pursuant to subdivision (d) and is of a material type and form that routinely becomes feedstock used in the production of a new products product or packaging.
(2)Paragraph (1) does not apply to either of the following:
(A)Any product or packaging that is manufactured up to 18 months after the date the department publishes the first material characterization study required pursuant to subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), or before January 1, 2024, whichever is later.
(B)Any product or packaging manufactured up to 18 months after the date the department updates the material characterization study pursuant to subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), if the product or packaging satisfied or, for a new product or packaging, would have satisfied, the requirements to be considered recyclable in the state pursuant to subdivision (d) before the publication of the updated study.
(3)Subject to paragraph (2), for a product or packaging that is not considered to be recyclable in the state pursuant to subdivision (d), all of the following apply:
(A)Displaying a chasing arrows symbol or any other statement indicating the product is recyclable directly on the product shall be deemed to be deceptive or misleading pursuant to this section and Section 17580.5 of the Business and Professions Code.
(B)If a product or packaging has multiple material types, a chasing arrows symbol or statement indicating recyclability may be displayed on the external packaging that is considered to be recyclable in the state pursuant to subdivision (d) if the chasing arrows symbol or statement makes clear in the same or greater font, font size, or symbol size which other components of the product or packaging are not recyclable.
(C)Displaying a chasing arrows symbol or any other statement indicating recyclability on packaging containing a consumable product shall, for purposes of this section, be deemed to refer only to the packaging. For purposes of this subparagraph, consumable product means a commodity that is intended to be used and not disposed of.
(c)For purposes of this section, the following do not constitute a deceptive or misleading claim about the recyclability of the product or packaging pursuant to this section or Section 17580.5 of the Business and Professions Code:
(1)A person using a chasing arrows symbol in combination with a clearly visible line placed at a 45-degree angle over the chasing arrows symbol to convey that an item is not recyclable.
(2)A consumer good that is required by any federal or California law or regulation to display a chasing arrows symbol, including, but not limited to, Section 103(b)(1) of the federal Mercury-Containing and Rechargeable Battery Management Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 14322(b)(1)) and Section 25215.65 of the Health and Safety Code.
(3)Directing a consumer to compost or properly dispose of a consumer good through an organics recycling program.
(4)A resin identification code placed inside a solid equilateral triangle.
(d)(1)On or before January 1, 2024, in order to provide information to the public sufficient for evaluating whether a product or packaging is recyclable in the state according to the criteria set forth in paragraph (2) and is of a material type and form that routinely becomes feedstock used in the production of new products or packaging, the department shall do both of the following:
(A)(i)Update the regulations promulgated pursuant to Section 41821.5 to include both of the following in the information to be submitted to the department pursuant to that section:
(I)How the material collected or processed by the operations and facilities was collected.
(II)What material types and forms are actively recovered, and not considered contaminants, by the operation or facility.
(ii)The department shall publish the information required pursuant to clause (i) in a form the department deems appropriate for achieving the purpose of this section consistent with the requirements of paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 41821.5.
(B)(i)To get a representative sample of recycling programs in the state, the department shall conduct and publish on its internet website a characterization study of material types and forms that are collected, sorted, sold, or transferred by solid waste facilities deemed appropriate by the department for inclusion in the study. The departments activities pursuant to this subparagraph, including the departments determination of the appropriate facilities to include in the study, are exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code).
(ii)The department shall update the material characterization study required pursuant to this subparagraph every five years, with the first update being issued by the department in 2027.
(iii)Notwithstanding clauses (i) and (ii), the department may publish additional information that was not available at the time of the most recent periodic material characterization study regarding the appropriate characterization of material types and forms.
(iv)For purposes of studying a representative sample of material types and forms in the state, within 90 days of a department request, a facility shall allow for periodic sampling conducted by a designated representative of the department on a mutually-agreed upon date and time. The department shall not request a periodic sampling of a facility if that facility was sampled during the previous 24 months.
(v)For each material characterization study conducted pursuant to this subparagraph, the department shall publish on its internet website the preliminary findings of the study and conduct a public meeting to present the preliminary findings and receive public comments. The public meeting shall occur at least 30 days after the department publishes the preliminary findings. After receiving and considering public comments, and within 60 days of the public meeting, the department shall finalize and publish on its internet website the findings of the study.
(2)Subject to paragraph (3), a product or packaging is considered recyclable in the state if, based on information published by the department pursuant to subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), the product or packaging is of a material type and form that meets both of the following requirements:
(A)The material type and form is collected for recycling by recycling programs for jurisdictions that collectively encompass at least 60 percent of the population of the state.
(B)(i)The material type and form is sorted into defined streams for recycling processes by large volume transfer or processing facilities, as defined in regulations adopted pursuant to Section 43020, that process materials and collectively serve at least 60 percent of recycling programs statewide, with the defined streams sent to and reclaimed at a reclaiming facility consistent with the requirements of the Basel Convention.
(ii)The department may adopt regulations modifying this requirement to encompass transfer or processing facilities other than large volume transfer or processing facilities, as the department deems appropriate for achieving the purposes of this section.
(3)A product or packaging shall not be considered recyclable in the state unless the product or packaging meets all of the following criteria, as applicable:
(A)For plastic packaging, the plastic packaging is designed to not include any components, inks, adhesives, or labels that prevent the recyclability of the packaging according to the APR Design Guide published by the Association of Plastic Recyclers.
(B)For plastic products and non-plastic products and packaging, the product or packaging is designed to ensure recyclability and does not include any components, inks, adhesives, or labels that prevent the recyclability of the product or packaging.
(C)The product or packaging does not contain an intentionally added chemical identified pursuant to the regulations implementing subparagraph (4) of subdivision (g) of Section 42370.2.
(D)The product or packaging is not made from plastic or fiber that contains perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances or PFAS that meets either of the following criteria:
(i)PFAS that a manufacturer has intentionally added to a product or packaging and that have a functional or technical effect in the product or packaging, including the PFAS components of intentionally added chemicals and PFAS that are intentional breakdown products of an added chemical that also have a functional or technical effect in the product.
(ii)The presence of PFAS in a product or product component or packaging or packaging component at or above 100 parts per million, as measured in total organic flourine.
(4)Notwithstanding paragraphs (2) and (3), a product or packaging is recyclable in the state if the product or packaging has a demonstrated recycling rate of at least 75 percent, meaning that not less than 75 percent of the product or packaging sorted and aggregated in the state is reprocessed into new products or packaging.
(5)(A)Before January 1, 2030, notwithstanding paragraphs (2) and (3), a product or packaging not collected pursuant to a curbside collection program is recyclable in the state if the non-curbside collection program recovers at least 60 percent of the product or packaging in the program and the material has sufficient commercial value to be marketed for recycling and be transported at the end of its useful life to a transfer, processing, or recycling facility to be sorted and aggregated into defined streams by material type and form.
(B)After January 1, 2030, notwithstanding paragraphs (2) and (3), a product or packaging not collected pursuant to a curbside collection program is recyclable in the state if the non-curbside collection program recovers at least 75 percent of the product or packaging in the program and the material has sufficient commercial value to be marketed for recycling and be transported at the end of its useful life to a transfer, processing, or recycling facility to be sorted and aggregated into defined streams by material type and form.
(6)Notwithstanding paragraphs (2) and (3), a product or packaging is recyclable in the state if the product or packaging is part of, and in compliance with, a program established pursuant to state or federal law on or after January 1, 2022, governing the recyclability or disposal of that product or packaging if the director determines that the product or packaging will not increase contamination of curbside recycling or deceive consumers as to the recyclability of the product or packaging.
(7)The information published by the department pursuant to paragraph (1) shall not limit the discretion of a local agency under existing law to decide whether, and to what extent, a material type or form shall be accepted by a local recycling program.
(e)For purposes of this section, chasing arrows symbol has the meaning set forth in subdivision (f) of Section 17580 of the Business and Professions Code.
(f)Consistent with the waste hierarchy established pursuant to Section 40051, and pursuant to Section 40180, for purposes of this section, recycling, recyclable, and recyclability do not include transformation, as defined in Section 40201, EMSW conversion, or production of fuels.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2024 | Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry. |
| Aug 19, 2024 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Aug 15, 2024 | From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (August 15). |
| Aug 15, 2024 | Coauthors revised. |
| Aug 7, 2024 | August 7 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file. |
| Jun 25, 2024 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Jun 3, 2024 | Referred to Com. on E.M. |
| May 24, 2024 | In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk. |
| May 24, 2024 | Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 4211.) Ordered to the Assembly. |
| May 22, 2024 | Ordered to special consent calendar. |
| May 20, 2024 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| May 16, 2024 | Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading. |
| May 16, 2024 | From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3985.) (May 16). |
| May 14, 2024 | Set for hearing May 16. |
| May 13, 2024 | May 13 hearing: Placed on APPR suspense file. |
| May 3, 2024 | Set for hearing May 13. |
| May 2, 2024 | May 6 hearing postponed by committee. |
| Apr 26, 2024 | Set for hearing May 6. |
| Apr 25, 2024 | April 29 hearing postponed by committee. |
| Apr 22, 2024 | Set for hearing April 29. |
| Apr 18, 2024 | April 22 hearing postponed by committee. |
| Apr 12, 2024 | Set for hearing April 22. |
| Apr 9, 2024 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0. Page 3530.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Apr 4, 2024 | Set for hearing April 9. |
| Apr 3, 2024 | Re-referred to Com. on G.O. |
| Mar 19, 2024 | Withdrawn from committee. |
| Mar 19, 2024 | Re-referred to Com. on RLS. |
| Mar 19, 2024 | April 17 hearing postponed by committee. |
| Mar 18, 2024 | From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q. |
| Mar 12, 2024 | Set for hearing April 17. |
| Feb 29, 2024 | Referred to Com. on E.Q. |
| Feb 20, 2024 | From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 18. |
| Feb 16, 2024 | Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2024 | Do pass. | Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Jun 24, 2024 | Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar | Assembly Standing Committee on Emergency Management |
Passed |
|
| May 24, 2024 | Special Consent SB1461 Allen | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| May 16, 2024 | Do pass as amended | Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| May 13, 2024 | Placed on suspense file | Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Apr 9, 2024 | Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar | Senate Standing Committee on Governmental Organization |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| city of laguna niguel | ** Support | |
| City of Rancho Palos Verdes | ** Support | |
| County of Humboldt | ** Support | |
| County of Santa Barbara | ** Support | |
| County of Santa Cruz | ** Support | |
| League Of California Cities | ** Support | |
| South Bay Cities Council of Governments | ** Support |
SENATE THIRD READING
STR Bill Id:SB 1461
Author:(Allen)
As Amended Ver:May 16, 2024
Majority vote
SUMMARY
This bill adds "landslide" to the conditions constituting a state of emergency or a local emergency, as specified.
Major Provisions
Adds "landslide" to the conditions constituting a state of emergency or a local emergency.
COMMENTS
Recent Efforts to Add Conditions Constituting a State of Emergency or Local Emergency: In 2021, Senator Dodd and Assemblymember Levine each ran a bill that would have added a "deenergization event" to conditions that constitute a local emergency (AB 1403) and state of emergency (SB 52), respectively. SB 52 (Dodd) was signed by the Governor, while AB 1403 (Levine) was vetoed with the following message: "This legislation is unnecessary, as existing statute provides broad emergency authority when disaster conditions are met." The following year, SB 468 (Dodd), Chapter 537, Statutes of 2022 added “electromagnetic pulse attack" to the list of conditions constituting a state of emergency or a local emergency and was signed by the Governor.
Role of Conditions Listed in the Emergency Service's Act: The conditions that constitute a local or state of emergency are intended as frameworks and examples. They are not intended to be the only conditions that the Governor or local governments can use to declare an emergency. To cover all other emergencies, the Act specifically includes "other conditions, other than conditions resulting from a labor controversy or conditions causing a 'state of war emergency,' which, by reason of their magnitude, are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of any single county, city and county, or city and require the combined forces of a mutual aid region or regions to combat."
Landslides: The California Geological Survey (CGS) classifies landslides based on the type of material (rock or soil) and the type of movement (falls, topples, spreads, slides, or flows). CGS provides technical input and advice to Cal OES during and after major landslide events and wildfires to anticipate post-fire debris flows. They produce reports for OES and local emergency agencies to help evaluate ongoing hazards and plan recovery efforts. The California Department of Conservation monitors and maps landslides across the state, providing regular updates on their website.
According to the Author
"Since the 1950's, the City of Rancho Palos Verdes has experienced a slow-moving landslide that has only been exacerbated by extreme storm events in recent years. Continuous repairs to homes and public infrastructure such as sewer, water, and power lines, and a high traffic road that serves as a wildfire evacuation route cost the city upward of half a million dollars annually. Existing law prevents the state from providing any disaster assistance to help the City manage risks to public safety."
The author continues, "SB 1461 will expand the definition of disasters constituting a state of emergency to include landslides. This will allow the City to declare an emergency to mitigate the ongoing effects of the landslide."
Arguments in Support
According to the City of Rancho Palo Verdes, "The perpetual threat of sudden, massive land movement not only poses a regional disaster but also an ecological catastrophe. Moreover, continuous land movement places our local infrastructure at constant risk of catastrophic failure and heightens the potential for wildfires, particularly in this high wildfire severity zone. Given these circumstances, it is imperative that the City be granted the tools to undertake all necessary measures to mitigate the impacts of the landslide. Therefore, we endorse SB 1461 and express our deepest appreciation for your leadership on this paramount issue."
Arguments in Opposition
None on file.
FISCAL COMMENTS
According to the Assembly Committee on Appropriations, "General Fund (GF) and special fund cost pressures of an unknown, but potentially significant amount, across all state agencies to execute directives if the Governor declares a state of emergency due to a landslide. The magnitude of cost pressures depends on the severity of the landslide, area impacted, and the length of the state of emergency proclamation."
VOTES
SENATE FLOOR: 38-0-2
YES: Alvarado-Gil, Ashby, Atkins, Becker, Blakespear, Bradford, Caballero, Cortese, Dahle, Dodd, Durazo, Eggman, Glazer, Gonzalez, Grove, Hurtado, Jones, Laird, Limón, McGuire, Menjivar, Min, Newman, Nguyen, Niello, Ochoa Bogh, Padilla, Portantino, Roth, Rubio, Seyarto, Skinner, Smallwood-Cuevas, Stern, Umberg, Wahab, Wiener, Wilk
ABS, ABST OR NV: Allen, Archuleta
ASM EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT: 8-0-0
YES: Rodriguez, Davies, Arambula, Bennett, Boerner, Calderon, Wendy Carrillo, Waldron
ASM APPROPRIATIONS: 14-0-1
YES: Wicks, Sanchez, Arambula, Bryan, Calderon, Wendy Carrillo, Dixon, Mike Fong, Grayson, Haney, Hart, Pellerin, Ta, Villapudua
ABS, ABST OR NV: Jim Patterson
UPDATED
VERSION: May 16, 2024
CONSULTANT: Ryan Fleming / E.M. / (916) 319-3802 FN: 0003918
Date of Hearing: August 7, 2024
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Buffy Wicks, Chair
SBPCA Bill Id:SB 1461
Author:(Allen) – As Amended Ver:May 16, 2024
Policy Committee: | Emergency Management | Vote: | 8 - 0 |
|
| ||
|
|
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY:
This bill adds a “landslide” to the list of conditions for which a state of emergency or local emergency may be proclaimed.
FISCAL EFFECT:
General Fund (GF) and special fund cost pressures of an unknown, but potentially significant amount, across all state agencies to execute directives if the Governor declares a state of emergency due to a landslide. The magnitude of cost pressures depends on the severity of the landslide, area impacted, and the length of the state of emergency proclamation.
According to the Legislative Analyst’s Office, the GF faces a structural deficit in the tens of billions of dollars over the next several fiscal years.
COMMENTS:
- Purpose. According to the author:
Since the 1950’s, the city of Rancho Palos Verdes has experienced a slow-moving landslide that has only been exacerbated by extreme storm events in recent years. Continuous repairs to homes and public infrastructure such as sewer, water, and power lines, and a high traffic road that serves as a wildfire evacuation route cost the city upward of half a million dollars annually. Existing law prevents the state from providing any disaster assistance to help the City manage risks to public safety.
SB 1461 will expand the definition of disasters constituting a state of emergency to include landslides. This will allow the City to declare an emergency to mitigate the ongoing effects of the landslide.
This bill is supported by the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, other individual cities and counties, and the League of California Cities.
- Emergency Services Act (ESA). The ESA gives the Governor authority to proclaim a state of emergency in an area affected, or likely to be affected, when: (a) conditions of disaster or extreme peril exist, (b) the Governor is requested to do so by a designated local government official, or (c) the Governor finds that local authority is inadequate to cope with the emergency. A local government may also issue a local emergency proclamation, which is a prerequisite for a state proclamation. Examples of conditions of disaster or extreme peril include air pollution, fire, flood, storm, epidemic, riot, drought, cyberterrorism, sudden and severe energy shortage, plant or animal infestation or disease, or an earthquake, amongst others. This bill adds a landslide to that list.
- Related Legislation. AB 1786 (Rodriguez), among other provisions, adds climate change and a climate change exacerbated condition to the conditions of disaster or extreme peril under the ESA. AB 1786 was held on this committee’s suspense file.
- Prior Legislation. SB 468 (Dodd), Chapter 537, Statutes of 2022, added an electromagnetic pulse attack to the conditions of disaster or extreme peril under the ESA.
Analysis Prepared by: Irene Ho / APPR. / (916) 319-2081
Date of Hearing: June 24, 2024
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
Freddie Rodriguez, Chair
SBPCA Bill Id:SB 1461
Author:(Allen) – As Amended Ver:May 16, 2024
SENATE VOTE: 38-0
SUBJECT: State of emergency and local emergency: landslide
SUMMARY: This bill adds “landslide” to the conditions constituting a state of emergency or a local emergency, as specified.
EXISTING LAW:
- Under the California Emergency Services Act, establishes the California Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) within the office of the Governor for the purpose of mitigating the effects of natural, manmade, or war-caused emergencies. (Government Code § 8550)
- Authorizes the Governor to proclaim a state of emergency, when specified disaster conditions are met (Government Code § 8567 and 8558)
- Authorizes local officials and local governments to proclaim a local emergency, when specified disaster conditions are met (Government Code § 8630)
- Grants the Governor or local government who have proclaimed an emergency to exercise certain powers in response to that emergency (Government Code § 8571)
- Under the California Emergency Services Act, defines a state of emergency to mean the duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state caused by conditions such as, among others, air pollution, fire, flood, and storm. (Government Code § 8558)
- Under the California Emergency Services Act, defines a local emergency to mean the duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the territorial limits of a county, city and county, or city, caused by conditions such as, among others, air pollution, fire, flood, and storm. (Government Code § 8558)
FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Senate Committee on Appropriations, “No immediate state fiscal impact. In the event that a state of emergency is called due to a landslide, the state will incur costs. However, those costs are indeterminate at this time and will ultimately depend on, among other things, the severity of the landslide, area impacted, and the length of the state of emergency proclamation (General Fund, special fund, and federal funds).”
COMMENTS:
Purpose of the Bill: According to the author, “Since the 1950’s, the City of Rancho Palos Verdes has experienced a slow-moving landslide that has only been exacerbated by extreme storm events in recent years. Continuous repairs to homes and public infrastructure such as sewer, water, and power lines, and a high traffic road that serves as a wildfire evacuation route cost the city upward of half a million dollars annually. Existing law prevents the state from providing any disaster assistance to help the City manage risks to public safety.”
The author continues, “SB 1461 will expand the definition of disasters constituting a state of emergency to include landslides. This will allow the City to declare an emergency to mitigate the ongoing effects of the landslide.”
Equity: Committee staff notes disasters have a disproportionate impact on vulnerable individuals and communities.
California Emergency Services Act: The California Emergency Services Act (ESA) was enacted in 1970, and established Cal OES within the Governor’s Office. The ESA gives the Governor authority to proclaim a state of emergency in an area affected or likely to be affected when: conditions of disaster or extreme peril exist; the Governor is requested to do so upon request from a designated local government official; or the Governor finds that local authority is inadequate to cope with the emergency. Current statute provides multiple examples of conditions that may constitute an emergency, including, but not limited to earthquakes, fires, and floods. This bill would add landslide to that list. However, there is a catch-all statement at the end of current statute that allows the Governor to declare a state of emergency for “other conditions, other than conditions resulting from a labor controversy or conditions causing a “state of war emergency,” which, by reason of their magnitude, are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of any single county, city and county, or city and require the combined forces of a mutual aid region or regions to combat,” which could include landslides.
Local governments may also issue local emergency proclamations, which is a prerequisite for requesting the Governor’s Proclamation of a State of Emergency.
Emergency Preparedness and Response: Cal OES is responsible for addressing natural, technological, or manmade disasters and emergencies, and preparing the State to prevent, respond to, quickly recover from, and mitigate the effects of both intentional and natural disasters. As part of their overall preparedness mission, Cal OES is required to develop a State Emergency Plan (SEP), State Hazard Mitigation Plan (SHMP), and maintains Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) and the Emergency Management Mutual Aid System (EMMA). Cal OES, in coordination with FEMA and local partners, has developed four Catastrophic Plans to augment the State Emergency Plan.
California is a Disaster Prone State: Since 2018, 27 major federal disasters have been proclaimed in the State of California due to wildfires, floods, earthquakes, a hurricane, a tropical storm and a pandemic. These major disasters have taken a heavy toll on lives, homes, communities, and public infrastructure throughout the state. In the past two years alone, severe winter storms have caused more than a billion dollars in damages. These disasters came on the heels of the Covid-19 pandemic and unprecedented wildfires that lead to the deadliest wildfire in California’s history.
The impacts of these disasters cannot be understated, many lives were lost, thousands of homes were destroyed, and residents, in some cases entire communities, have been forced to relocate. Billions of dollars in damage was caused to homes, businesses, and infrastructure throughout the state. Many communities are now feeling the cumulative impact of several years of disasters and are still engaged in comprehensive, long-term recovery planning.
Recent Efforts to Add Conditions Constituting a State of Emergency or Local Emergency: In 2021, Senator Dodd and Assemblymember Levine each ran a bill that would have added a “deenergization event” to conditions that constitute a local emergency (AB 1403) and state of emergency (SB 52), respectively. SB 52 (Dodd) was signed by the Governor, while AB 1403 (Levine) was vetoed with the following message: “This legislation is unnecessary, as existing statute provides broad emergency authority when disaster conditions are met.” The following year, SB 468 (Dodd, Chapter 537, Statutes of 2022) added “electromagnetic pulse attack” to the list of conditions constituting a state of emergency or a local emergency and was signed by the Governor.
Role of Conditions Listed in the Emergency Service’s Act: The conditions that constitute a local or state of emergency are intended as frameworks and examples. They are not intended to be the only conditions that the Governor or local governments can use to declare an emergency. The To cover all other emergencies, the Act specifically includes “other conditions, other than conditions resulting from a labor controversy or conditions causing a ‘state of war emergency,’ which, by reason of their magnitude, are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of any single county, city and county, or city and require the combined forces of a mutual aid region or regions to combat.”
Landslides: The California Geological Survey (CGS) classifies landslides based on the type of material (rock or soil) and the type of movement (falls, topples, spreads, slides, or flows).
- Rock: Hard or firm bedrock that was intact before the landslide.
- Soil: Unconsolidated particles or poorly cemented rock.
Landslide movements are interpreted from the geomorphic features of the landslide deposit and source area:
Falls: This type occurs when masses of rock or soil detach from a steep slope and descend rapidly. This includes rocks breaking off a cliff and falling.
Topples: This involves the forward rotation and fall of a mass of material, similar to how a tall structure might tilt and fall over.
Lateral Spreads: Typically triggered by earthquakes, these involve the horizontal movement of the ground, often due to liquefaction, where the ground behaves like a fluid.
Slides: These are characterized by the movement of material along one or more defined surfaces:
- Rotational Sliding: The sliding surface is curved, causing the displaced material to rotate backwards around an axis parallel to the slope, akin to scooping with a spoon.
- Translational Sliding: Here, the sliding surface is more or less flat, and the material moves parallel to the ground, similar to pushing a book across a table.
Flows: This type of movement involves materials, often saturated with water, flowing downslope like a viscous fluid. An example is a mudslide, where wet soil and debris flow down similarly to a thick liquid.
Landslide Mapping and Monitoring: The California Department of Conservation monitors and maps landslides across the state, providing regular updates on their website. In the 1970s, the CGS created "Geology for Planning" and "Environmental Geological Analysis" reports and maps for urban areas to help local agencies understand and manage landslide hazards as residential areas expanded into landslide-prone regions.
After the 1982 El Nino storms in the San Francisco Bay area, the Landslide Hazard Mapping Act required new maps showing landslide risks. From 1986 to 1995, CGS produced Landslide Hazard Identification Maps for local government planners. Each study area typically included a set of three to four maps based on a USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map. Current active landslide programs at CGS include the Forest and Watershed Geology Program, the Seismic Hazards Program, and the Highway Corridor Landslide Hazard Mapping as well as any technical reports and disaster response efforts.
CGS provides technical input and advice to Cal OES during and after major landslide events and wildfires to anticipate post-fire debris flows. They produce reports for OES and local emergency agencies to help evaluate ongoing hazards and plan recovery efforts.
Arguments in Support: According to the City of Rancho Palo Verdes, “The perpetual threat of sudden, massive land movement not only poses a regional disaster but also an ecological catastrophe. Moreover, continuous land movement places our local infrastructure at constant risk of catastrophic failure and heightens the potential for wildfires, particularly in this high wildfire severity zone. Given these circumstances, it is imperative that the City be granted the tools to undertake all necessary measures to mitigate the impacts of the landslide. Therefore, we endorse SB 1461 and express our deepest appreciation for your leadership on this paramount issue.”
Arguments in Opposition: None on file.
Prior Legislation:
AB 1786 (Rodriguez, 2024) among other things, adds “climate change” and “climate change exacerbated conditions” to the list of conditions for which a state of emergency or local emergency may be proclaimed. (Held in the Assembly Committee on Appropriations)
SB 468 (Dodd, Chapter 537, Statutes of 2022) added “electromagnetic pulse attack” to the list of conditions constituting a state of emergency or local emergency.
SB 52 (Dodd, Chapter 597, Statutes of 2021) added a “deenergization event” to the list of those conditions constituting a local emergency, with prescribed limitations.
AB 1403 (Levine, 2021) would have added “deenergization event” to the list of conditions constituting a state of emergency and local emergency, as specified. (Vetoed by Governor Newsom)
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
City of Laguna Niguel
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
City of Thousand Oaks
County of Humboldt
County of Santa Barbara
County of Santa Cruz
League of California Cities
South Bay Cities Council of Governments
Opposition
None on file.
Analysis Prepared by: Ryan Fleming / E.M. / (916) 319-3802
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | SB 1461 |
THIRD READING
Bill No: SB 1461
Author: Allen (D)
Amended: 5/16/24
Vote: 21
SENATE GOVERNMENTAL ORG. COMMITTEE: 14-0, 4/9/24
AYES: Dodd, Wilk, Alvarado-Gil, Archuleta, Bradford, Glazer, Jones, Nguyen, Ochoa Bogh, Padilla, Portantino, Rubio, Seyarto, Smallwood-Cuevas
NO VOTE RECORDED: Ashby, Roth
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 7-0, 5/16/24
AYES: Caballero, Jones, Ashby, Becker, Bradford, Seyarto, Wahab
SUBJECT: State of emergency and local emergency: landslide
SOURCE: Author
DIGEST:
This bill adds “landslide” to the conditions constituting a state of emergency or a local emergency, as specified.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- The Emergency Services Act (ESA) authorizes the Governor to declare a state of emergency, and local officials and local governments to declare a local emergency, when specified conditions of disaster or extreme peril to the safety of persons and property exist.
- Defines the term “state of emergency” and “local emergency” to mean a duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state caused by, among other things, fire, storm, riot, or cyberterrorism, as specified.
This bill:
- Adds “landslide” to the list of conditions that constitute a state of emergency or a local emergency.
Background
Author Statement. According to the author’s office:
“Since the 1950s, the City of Rancho Palos Verdes has experienced a slow-moving landslide that has only been exacerbated by extreme storm events in recent years. Continuous repairs to homes and public infrastructure such as sewer, water, and power lines, and a high traffic road that serves as a wildfire evacuation route cost the city upward of $1 million annually. Existing law prevents the state from providing any disaster assistance to help the City manage risks to public safety.”
Further, “SB 1461 will expand the definition of disasters constituting a state of emergency to include landslides. This will allow the City to request assistance from CalOES under the California Disaster Assistance Act to mitigate the ongoing effects of the landslide.”
In further support of the bill, the author’s office sites the Rancho Palos Verdes Portuguese Bend Landslide Complex (PBLC), which is approximately 240 acres, and was activated in 1956 during the extension of Crenshaw Boulevard, well before the founding of the city of Rancho Palos Verdes, in Southern California.
Movement occurs because of subsurface dynamics between ground water and naturally occurring Bentonite Clay mineral layer. The area is under continual threat of sudden major land movement, which would be a South Bay regional disaster and ecological catastrophe. There are 193 homes in the landslide area, many of which are moving with the land across property lines, creating major disputes with no end in sight. The land there is currently moving at an average rate of 18 inches per year.
California Emergency Services Act. The ESA was enacted in 1970, and established the Office of Emergency Services (OES) within the Governor’s Office. Under the ESA, OES is charged with coordinating statewide emergency preparedness; post emergency recovery and mitigation efforts; and the development, review, approval, and integration of emergency plans.
The ESA gives the Governor the authority to proclaim a state of emergency in an area affected or likely to be affected when: a) conditions of disaster or extreme peril exist; b) the Governor is requested to do so upon request from a designated local government official; or c) the Governor finds that local authority is inadequate to cope with the emergency. Local governments may also issue local emergency proclamations, which is a prerequisite for requesting the Governor’s Proclamation of a State of Emergency.
Specifically, the ESA defines a “state of emergency” as the duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state caused by conditions such as air pollution, fire, flood, storm, epidemic, riot, drought, cyberterrorism, sudden and severe energy shortage, (deenergization event – specifically only for a local emergency), electromagnetic pulse attack, plant or animal infestation or disease, the Governor’s warning of an earthquake or volcanic prediction, or an earthquake, or other conditions, other than conditions resulting from a labor controversy or conditions causing a “state of war emergency,” which, by reason of their magnitude, are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of any single county, city and county, or city and require the combined forces of a mutual aid region or regions to combat, or with respect to regulated energy utilities, a sudden and severe energy shortage requires extraordinary measures beyond the authority vested in the Public Utilities Commission.
The ESA grants the Governor certain special powers during a declared state of emergency, which are in addition to any other existing powers otherwise granted. For example, the ESA empowers the Governor to expend any appropriation for support of the ESA in order to carry out its provisions, as well as the authority to make, amend, and rescind orders and regulations necessary to carry out the ESA. The orders and regulations shall have the force and effect of law.
The ESA is generally considered to give a governor broad authority to declare a state of emergency or local emergency beyond the existing list of conditions. Specifically, the ESA states “other conditions, other than conditions resulting from a labor controversy or conditions causing a ‘state of war emergency,’ which, by reason of their magnitude, are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of any single county, city and county, or city and require the combined forces of a mutual aid region or regions to combat.”
To that end, Governor Newsom noted in his veto of AB 1403 (Levine, 2021) which would have added a “deenergization event” to the list of conditions constituting a state of emergency that the “legislation is unnecessary, as existing statute provides broad emergency authority when disaster conditions are met.”
There are currently 57 open state of emergency proclamations in California proclaimed by the Governor as of March 22, 2024. Event types for these states of emergency include: early February 2024 storms; the fire near downtown Los Angeles damaging a portion of the I-10 freeway; Humboldt Earthquake; extreme heat event from August 2022; drought; high winds; wildfire; and tree mortality.
OES takes a proactive approach to addressing these risks, threats, and vulnerabilities that form the basis of its mission and has been tested through real events, as well as comprehensive exercises that help OES to maintain a state of readiness and to plan for and mitigate impacts.
Landslide. This bill proposes to add “landslide” to the list of conditions in the ESA noted above that constitute a state of emergency or a local emergency. The bill defines “landslide” to mean the movement of a mass of rock, debris, or earth down a slope under the direct influence of gravity that travels at a speed of at least one inch per year.
The California Department of Conservation tracks and maps landslides in California and provides regular updates on their internet website. In the 1970s, the California Geological Survey (CGS) prepared a series of “Geology for Planning” and “Environmental Geological Analysis” reports and maps for local agencies in urban areas. These products were designed to assist local agencies in urbanizing areas. These products were designed to assist local agencies in evaluating hazards and developing policies that consider landslide hazards as residential development spread into landslide-prone terrain.
Following the 1982 El Nino storms in the San Francisco Bay area, the Landslide Hazard Mapping Act mandated new maps to show landslides and landslide hazards. Landslide Hazard Identification Maps were prepared by CGS for use by local government planners from 1986 to 1995. A set of three to four maps was prepared for each map study area, usually encompassing a USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map. Current active landslide mapping programs at CGS, and their respective products, include: the Forest and Watershed Geology Program; Seismic Hazards Program; Highway Corridor Landslide Hazard Mapping; and technical reports and disaster response.
CGS regularly provides technical input and advice to OES during and immediately following major landslide events, and immediately following major wildfires in anticipation of post-fire debris flows. CGS provides brief reports on individual emergency response tasks to OES and local emergency response agencies to assist them in evaluating ongoing hazards and planning for recovery. Post-event reports and maps documenting landslide occurrences have been summarized as Open-File Reports, articles in California Geology magazine, and on CGS’s web pages.
CGS classifies landslides with a two-part designation. The designation captures both the type of material that failed and the type of movement that the failed material exhibited. Material types are broadly categorized as either rock or soil, or a combination of the two for complex movements. Rock refers to hard or firm bedrock that was intact and in place prior to slope movement. Soil, either residual or transported material, is used in the engineering sense to mean unconsolidated particles or poorly cemented rock or aggregates.
Soil is distinguished further on the basis of texture as debris (coarse fragments) or earth (fine fragments). The distinction between rock and soil, and the further distinction between debris and earth is most often based on interpretation of geomorphic characteristics within landslide deposits, but can also be inferred from geologic characteristics of the parent material described on maps or observed in the field.
According to CGS, landslide movements are interpreted from the geomorphic expression of the landslide deposit and source area, and are categorized as falls, topples, spreads, slides, or flows. Falls are masses of soil or rock that dislodge from steep slopes and free-fall, bounce, or roll downslope. Topples move by the forward pivoting of a mass around an axis below the displaced mass. Lateral spreads, commonly induced by liquefaction of material in an earthquake, move by horizontal extension and shear or tensile fractures.
But Time Makes You Bolder. In recent years, and with varying levels of success, legislators have attempted to expand the conditions constituting a state of emergency or local emergency. For example, SB 468 (Dodd, Chapter 537, Statutes of 2022) added “electromagnetic pulse attack” to the list of conditions constituting a state of emergency or a local emergency, and SB 52 (Dodd, Chapter 597, Statutes of 2021) added “deenergization event” to the list of conditions constituting a local emergency.
Alternatively, Governor Newsom vetoed AB 1403 (Levine, 2021), writing that the “bill would specify that conditions constituting a state of emergency under the California Emergency Services Act may include a deenergization event, defined as a planned power outage. This legislation is unnecessary, as existing statute provides broad emergency authority when disaster conditions are met.”
Additionally, SB 1455 (Hertzburg, 2020) which would have added “electromagnetic pulse attack” to the list of conditions was never referred out of the Senate Rules Committee, and AB 2306 (Donnelly, 2012) which would have added “border security,” failed passage in the Assembly Governmental Organization Committee.
AB 1786 (Rodriguez, 2024) of this year proposes to add “climate change” and “climate change exacerbated conditions” to the list of conditions for which a state of emergency or local emergency may be proclaimed.
It is important to keep in mind that the conditions listed in the ESA, which this bill seeks to expand, are not exhaustive or intended to be the only conditions that can be used by the Governor or local jurisdictions to declare a state of emergency or local emergency.
Related/Prior Legislation
AB 1786 (Rodriguez, 2024) among other things, adds “climate change” and “climate change exacerbated conditions” to the list of conditions for which a state of emergency or local emergency may be proclaimed. (Pending in the Assembly Emergency Management Committee)
SB 468 (Dodd, Chapter 537, Statutes of 2022) added “electromagnetic pulse attack” to the list of conditions constituting a state of emergency or local emergency.
SB 52 (Dodd, Chapter 597, Statutes of 2021) added a “deenergization event” to the list of those conditions constituting a local emergency, with prescribed limitations.
AB 1403 (Levine, 2021) would have added “deenergization event” to the list of conditions constituting a state of emergency and local emergency, as specified. (Vetoed by Governor Newsom)
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No
According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:
No immediate state fiscal impact. In the event that a state of emergency is called due to a landslide, the state will incur costs. However, those costs are indeterminate at this time and will ultimately depend on, among other things, the severity of the landslide, area impacted, and the length of the state of emergency proclamation (General Fund, special fund, and federal funds).
SUPPORT: (Verified 5/16/24)
City of Laguna Niguel
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
County of Humboldt
County of Santa Barbara
County of Santa Cruz
League of California Cities
South Bay Cities Council of Governments
OPPOSITION: (Verified 5/16/24)
None received
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The City of Rancho Palos Verdes writes:
The “ancient Portuguese Bend Landslide Complex, triggered during the 1950s, has escalated due to climate-driven extreme rainfall, causing a significant rise in the water table. This surge in groundwater has accelerated the movement of the landslide complex with the land shifting at an alarming average rate of 18 inches per year, making this area the most active landslide zone in North America. This increased groundwater has dramatically changed the nature of the landslide complex, hastening the speed from a few inches to 10 feet of movement annually.
Further, the South Bay Cities Council of Governments writes that, “[i]n addition to constant repairs to homes, the public infrastructure such as sewer, water, power lines, and a high volume of traffic road is costing upwards of $1 million per year to repair. This road serves as a wildfire evacuation route as this area of the South Bay is designated as an extreme high wildfire risk zone. SB 1461 would allow cities like Rancho Palos Verdes to request the Governor declare a State of Emergency for landslides which would help assist in recovery efforts.”
Prepared by: Brian Duke / G.O. / (916) 651-1530
5/18/24 14:06:51
**** END ****
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | SB 1461 |
CONSENT
Bill No: SB 1461
Author: Allen (D)
Amended: 3/18/24
Vote: 21
SENATE GOVERNMENTAL ORG. COMMITTEE: 14-0, 4/9/24
AYES: Dodd, Wilk, Alvarado-Gil, Archuleta, Bradford, Glazer, Jones, Nguyen, Ochoa Bogh, Padilla, Portantino, Rubio, Seyarto, Smallwood-Cuevas
NO VOTE RECORDED: Ashby, Roth
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 7-0, 5/16/24
AYES: Caballero, Jones, Ashby, Becker, Bradford, Seyarto, Wahab
SUBJECT: State of emergency and local emergency: landslide
SOURCE: Author
DIGEST:
This bill adds “landslide” to the conditions constituting a state of emergency or a local emergency, as specified.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- The Emergency Services Act (ESA) authorizes the Governor to declare a state of emergency, and local officials and local governments to declare a local emergency, when specified conditions of disaster or extreme peril to the safety of persons and property exist.
- Defines the term “state of emergency” and “local emergency” to mean a duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state caused by, among other things, fire, storm, riot, or cyberterrorism, as specified.
This bill:
- Adds “landslide” to the list of conditions that constitute a state of emergency or a local emergency.
Background
Author Statement. According to the author’s office:
“Since the 1950s, the City of Rancho Palos Verdes has experienced a slow-moving landslide that has only been exacerbated by extreme storm events in recent years. Continuous repairs to homes and public infrastructure such as sewer, water, and power lines, and a high traffic road that serves as a wildfire evacuation route cost the city upward of $1 million annually. Existing law prevents the state from providing any disaster assistance to help the City manage risks to public safety.”
Further, “SB 1461 will expand the definition of disasters constituting a state of emergency to include landslides. This will allow the City to request assistance from CalOES under the California Disaster Assistance Act to mitigate the ongoing effects of the landslide.”
In further support of the bill, the author’s office sites the Rancho Palos Verdes Portuguese Bend Landslide Complex (PBLC), which is approximately 240 acres, and was activated in 1956 during the extension of Crenshaw Boulevard, well before the founding of the city of Rancho Palos Verdes, in Southern California.
Movement occurs because of subsurface dynamics between ground water and naturally occurring Bentonite Clay mineral layer. The area is under continual threat of sudden major land movement, which would be a South Bay regional disaster and ecological catastrophe. There are 193 homes in the landslide area, many of which are moving with the land across property lines, creating major disputes with no end in sight. The land there is currently moving at an average rate of 18 inches per year.
California Emergency Services Act. The ESA was enacted in 1970, and established the Office of Emergency Services (OES) within the Governor’s Office. Under the ESA, OES is charged with coordinating statewide emergency preparedness; post emergency recovery and mitigation efforts; and the development, review, approval, and integration of emergency plans.
The ESA gives the Governor the authority to proclaim a state of emergency in an area affected or likely to be affected when: a) conditions of disaster or extreme peril exist; b) the Governor is requested to do so upon request from a designated local government official; or c) the Governor finds that local authority is inadequate to cope with the emergency. Local governments may also issue local emergency proclamations, which is a prerequisite for requesting the Governor’s Proclamation of a State of Emergency.
Specifically, the ESA defines a “state of emergency” as the duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state caused by conditions such as air pollution, fire, flood, storm, epidemic, riot, drought, cyberterrorism, sudden and severe energy shortage, (deenergization event – specifically only for a local emergency), electromagnetic pulse attack, plant or animal infestation or disease, the Governor’s warning of an earthquake or volcanic prediction, or an earthquake, or other conditions, other than conditions resulting from a labor controversy or conditions causing a “state of war emergency,” which, by reason of their magnitude, are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of any single county, city and county, or city and require the combined forces of a mutual aid region or regions to combat, or with respect to regulated energy utilities, a sudden and severe energy shortage requires extraordinary measures beyond the authority vested in the Public Utilities Commission.
The ESA grants the Governor certain special powers during a declared state of emergency, which are in addition to any other existing powers otherwise granted. For example, the ESA empowers the Governor to expend any appropriation for support of the ESA in order to carry out its provisions, as well as the authority to make, amend, and rescind orders and regulations necessary to carry out the ESA. The orders and regulations shall have the force and effect of law.
The ESA is generally considered to give a governor broad authority to declare a state of emergency or local emergency beyond the existing list of conditions. Specifically, the ESA states “other conditions, other than conditions resulting from a labor controversy or conditions causing a ‘state of war emergency,’ which, by reason of their magnitude, are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of any single county, city and county, or city and require the combined forces of a mutual aid region or regions to combat.”
To that end, Governor Newsom noted in his veto of AB 1403 (Levine, 2021) which would have added a “deenergization event” to the list of conditions constituting a state of emergency that the “legislation is unnecessary, as existing statute provides broad emergency authority when disaster conditions are met.”
There are currently 57 open state of emergency proclamations in California proclaimed by the Governor as of March 22, 2024. Event types for these states of emergency include: early February 2024 storms; the fire near downtown Los Angeles damaging a portion of the I-10 freeway; Humboldt Earthquake; extreme heat event from August 2022; drought; high winds; wildfire; and tree mortality.
OES takes a proactive approach to addressing these risks, threats, and vulnerabilities that form the basis of its mission and has been tested through real events, as well as comprehensive exercises that help OES to maintain a state of readiness and to plan for and mitigate impacts.
Landslide. This bill proposes to add “landslide” to the list of conditions in the ESA noted above that constitute a state of emergency or a local emergency. The bill defines “landslide” to mean the movement of a mass of rock, debris, or earth down a slope under the direct influence of gravity that travels at a speed of at least one inch per year.
The California Department of Conservation tracks and maps landslides in California and provides regular updates on their internet website. In the 1970s, the California Geological Survey (CGS) prepared a series of “Geology for Planning” and “Environmental Geological Analysis” reports and maps for local agencies in urban areas. These products were designed to assist local agencies in urbanizing areas. These products were designed to assist local agencies in evaluating hazards and developing policies that consider landslide hazards as residential development spread into landslide-prone terrain.
Following the 1982 El Nino storms in the San Francisco Bay area, the Landslide Hazard Mapping Act mandated new maps to show landslides and landslide hazards. Landslide Hazard Identification Maps were prepared by CGS for use by local government planners from 1986 to 1995. A set of three to four maps was prepared for each map study area, usually encompassing a USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map. Current active landslide mapping programs at CGS, and their respective products, include: the Forest and Watershed Geology Program; Seismic Hazards Program; Highway Corridor Landslide Hazard Mapping; and technical reports and disaster response.
CGS regularly provides technical input and advice to OES during and immediately following major landslide events, and immediately following major wildfires in anticipation of post-fire debris flows. CGS provides brief reports on individual emergency response tasks to OES and local emergency response agencies to assist them in evaluating ongoing hazards and planning for recovery. Post-event reports and maps documenting landslide occurrences have been summarized as Open-File Reports, articles in California Geology magazine, and on CGS’s web pages.
CGS classifies landslides with a two-part designation. The designation captures both the type of material that failed and the type of movement that the failed material exhibited. Material types are broadly categorized as either rock or soil, or a combination of the two for complex movements. Rock refers to hard or firm bedrock that was intact and in place prior to slope movement. Soil, either residual or transported material, is used in the engineering sense to mean unconsolidated particles or poorly cemented rock or aggregates.
Soil is distinguished further on the basis of texture as debris (coarse fragments) or earth (fine fragments). The distinction between rock and soil, and the further distinction between debris and earth is most often based on interpretation of geomorphic characteristics within landslide deposits, but can also be inferred from geologic characteristics of the parent material described on maps or observed in the field.
According to CGS, landslide movements are interpreted from the geomorphic expression of the landslide deposit and source area, and are categorized as falls, topples, spreads, slides, or flows. Falls are masses of soil or rock that dislodge from steep slopes and free-fall, bounce, or roll downslope. Topples move by the forward pivoting of a mass around an axis below the displaced mass. Lateral spreads, commonly induced by liquefaction of material in an earthquake, move by horizontal extension and shear or tensile fractures.
But Time Makes You Bolder. In recent years, and with varying levels of success, legislators have attempted to expand the conditions constituting a state of emergency or local emergency. For example, SB 468 (Dodd, Chapter 537, Statutes of 2022) added “electromagnetic pulse attack” to the list of conditions constituting a state of emergency or a local emergency, and SB 52 (Dodd, Chapter 597, Statutes of 2021) added “deenergization event” to the list of conditions constituting a local emergency.
Alternatively, Governor Newsom vetoed AB 1403 (Levine, 2021), writing that the “bill would specify that conditions constituting a state of emergency under the California Emergency Services Act may include a deenergization event, defined as a planned power outage. This legislation is unnecessary, as existing statute provides broad emergency authority when disaster conditions are met.”
Additionally, SB 1455 (Hertzburg, 2020) which would have added “electromagnetic pulse attack” to the list of conditions was never referred out of the Senate Rules Committee, and AB 2306 (Donnelly, 2012) which would have added “border security,” failed passage in the Assembly Governmental Organization Committee.
AB 1786 (Rodriguez, 2024) of this year proposes to add “climate change” and “climate change exacerbated conditions” to the list of conditions for which a state of emergency or local emergency may be proclaimed.
It is important to keep in mind that the conditions listed in the ESA, which this bill seeks to expand, are not exhaustive or intended to be the only conditions that can be used by the Governor or local jurisdictions to declare a state of emergency or local emergency.
Related/Prior Legislation
AB 1786 (Rodriguez, 2024) among other things, adds “climate change” and “climate change exacerbated conditions” to the list of conditions for which a state of emergency or local emergency may be proclaimed. (Pending in the Assembly Emergency Management Committee)
SB 468 (Dodd, Chapter 537, Statutes of 2022) added “electromagnetic pulse attack” to the list of conditions constituting a state of emergency or local emergency.
SB 52 (Dodd, Chapter 597, Statutes of 2021) added a “deenergization event” to the list of those conditions constituting a local emergency, with prescribed limitations.
AB 1403 (Levine, 2021) would have added “deenergization event” to the list of conditions constituting a state of emergency and local emergency, as specified. (Vetoed by Governor Newsom)
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No
According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:
No immediate state fiscal impact. In the event that a state of emergency is called due to a landslide, the state will incur costs. However, those costs are indeterminate at this time and will ultimately depend on, among other things, the severity of the landslide, area impacted, and the length of the state of emergency proclamation (General Fund, special fund, and federal funds).
SUPPORT: (Verified 5/16/2024)
City of Laguna Niguel
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
County of Humboldt
County of Santa Barbara
County of Santa Cruz
League of California Cities
South Bay Cities Council of Governments
OPPOSITION: (Verified 5/16/2024)
None received
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The City of Rancho Palos Verdes writes:
The “ancient Portuguese Bend Landslide Complex, triggered during the 1950s, has escalated due to climate-driven extreme rainfall, causing a significant rise in the water table. This surge in groundwater has accelerated the movement of the landslide complex with the land shifting at an alarming average rate of 18 inches per year, making this area the most active landslide zone in North America. This increased groundwater has dramatically changed the nature of the landslide complex, hastening the speed from a few inches to 10 feet of movement annually.
Further, the South Bay Cities Council of Governments writes that, “[i]n addition to constant repairs to homes, the public infrastructure such as sewer, water, power lines, and a high volume of traffic road is costing upwards of $1 million per year to repair. This road serves as a wildfire evacuation route as this area of the South Bay is designated as an extreme high wildfire risk zone. SB 1461 would allow cities like Rancho Palos Verdes to request the Governor declare a State of Emergency for landslides which would help assist in recovery efforts.”
Prepared by: Brian Duke / G.O. / (916) 651-1530
5/17/24 10:18:36
**** END ****
SENATE COMMITTEE ON
Senator Anna Caballero, Chair
2023 - 2024 Regular Session
SB 1461 (Allen) - State of emergency and local emergency: landslide
Version: | Policy Vote: |
Urgency: | Mandate: |
Hearing Date: | Consultant: |
Bill Summary:
SB 1461 adds landslides, as defined, to the list of conditions of disaster or extreme peril that may constitute a state of emergency or local emergency.
*********** ANALYSIS ADDENDUM – SUSPENSE FILE ***********
The following information is revised to reflect amendments
adopted by the committee on May 16, 2024
Fiscal Impact:
No immediate state fiscal impact. In the event that a state of emergency is called due to a landslide, the state will incur costs. However, those costs are indeterminate at this time and will ultimately depend on, among other things, the severity of the landslide, area impacted, and the length of the state of emergency proclamation (General Fund, special fund, and federal funds).
Committee Amendments:
Delete definition of “landslide.”
-- END --
SENATE COMMITTEE ON
Senator Anna Caballero, Chair
2023 - 2024 Regular Session
SB 1461 (Allen) - State of emergency and local emergency: landslide
Version: | Policy Vote: |
Urgency: | Mandate: |
Hearing Date: | Consultant: |
Bill Summary:
SB 1461 adds landslides, as defined, to the list of conditions of disaster or extreme peril that may constitute a state of emergency or local emergency.
Fiscal Impact:
Unknown fiscal impact. In the event that a state of emergency is called due to a landslide, the state will incur significant costs (General Fund, various special funds, and federal funds). However, those costs are indeterminate at this time and will ultimately depend on, among other things, the severity of the landslide, area impacted, emergency response strategy required, and the duration of the state of emergency proclamation.
Background:
Generally, the ESA defines a “state of emergency” as the duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state caused by conditions such as air pollution, fire, flood, storm, epidemic, riot, drought, cyberterrorism, sudden and severe energy shortage, electromagnetic pulse attack, plant or animal infestation or disease, the Governor’s warning of an earthquake or volcanic prediction, or an earthquake, or other conditions, other than conditions resulting from a labor controversy or conditions causing a “state of war emergency.”
Proposed Law:
Adds landslides to the list of conditions of disaster or extreme peril that may constitute a state of emergency or local emergency. Defines “landslide” to mean the movement of a mass of rock, debris, or earth down a slope under the direct influence of gravity that travels at a speed of at least one inch per year.
Staff Comments:
Under the definition of “landslide” in this bill, a state of emergency or local emergency may be proclaimed for both the sudden mass movement and the slow gradual movement of material down a slope (geologically referred to as “creep”). According to the U.S. Geological Survey, creep is the imperceptibly slow, steady, downward movement of slope-forming soil or rock. Movement is caused by shear stress sufficient to produce permanent deformation, but too small to produce shear failure.
To the extent that the state must commit General Fund or Disaster Response Emergency Operations Account funds to proclaimed state of emergencies or local emergencies involving creep that it may not have otherwise directed these funds toward, there may be significant cost pressures for the state to respond to these longer-term ongoing emergencies as well as other proclaimed emergencies.
-- END --
SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION
Senator Bill Dodd
Chair
2023 - 2024 Regular
Bill No: 1461 Hearing Date: 4/9/2024
Author: | |||
Version: | 3/18/2024 Amended | ||
Urgency: | No | Fiscal: | Yes |
Consultant: | Brian Duke | ||
SUBJECT: State of emergency and local emergency: landslide
DIGEST: This bill adds “landslide” to the conditions constituting a state of emergency or a local emergency, as specified.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- The Emergency Services Act (ESA) authorizes the Governor to declare a state of emergency, and local officials and local governments to declare a local emergency, when specified conditions of disaster or extreme peril to the safety of persons and property exist.
- Defines the term “state of emergency” and “local emergency” to mean a duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state caused by, among other things, fire, storm, riot, or cyberterrorism, as specified.
This bill:
- Adds “landslide” to the list of conditions that constitute a state of emergency or a local emergency.
- Defines “landslide” to mean the movement of a mass of rock, debris, or earth down a slope under the direct influence of gravity that travels at a speed of at least one inch per year.
Background
Author Statement. According to the author’s office, “since the 1950s, the City of Rancho Palos Verdes has experienced a slow-moving landslide that has only been exacerbated by extreme storm events in recent years. Continuous repairs to homes and public infrastructure such as sewer, water, and power lines, and a high traffic road that serves as a wildfire evacuation route cost the city upward of $1 million annually. Existing law prevents the state from providing any disaster assistance to help the City manage risks to public safety.”
Further, “SB 1461 will expand the definition of disasters constituting a state of emergency to include landslides. This will allow the City to request assistance from CalOES under the California Disaster Assistance Act to mitigate the ongoing effects of the landslide.”
In further support of the bill, the author’s office sites the Rancho Palos Verdes Portuguese Bend Landslide Complex (PBLC), which is approximately 240 acres, and was activated in 1956 during the extension of Crenshaw Boulevard, well before the founding of the city of Rancho Palos Verdes, in Southern California.
Land moves at an average annual rate of 18 inches per year, and constitutes the most active landslide area in North America. Movement occurs because of subsurface dynamics between ground water and naturally occurring Bentonite Clay mineral layer. The area is under continual threat of sudden major land movement, which would be a South Bay regional disaster and ecological catastrophe. There are 193 homes in the landslide area, many of which are moving with the land across property lines, creating major disputes with no end in sight.
California Emergency Services Act. The ESA was enacted in 1970, and established the Office of Emergency Services (OES) within the Governor’s Office. Under the ESA, OES is charged with coordinating statewide emergency preparedness; post emergency recovery and mitigation efforts; and the development, review, approval, and integration of emergency plans.
The ESA gives the Governor the authority to proclaim a state of emergency in an area affected or likely to be affected when: a) conditions of disaster or extreme peril exist; b) the Governor is requested to do so upon request from a designated local government official; or c) the Governor finds that local authority is inadequate to cope with the emergency. Local governments may also issue local emergency proclamations, which is a prerequisite for requesting the Governor’s Proclamation of a State of Emergency.
Specifically, the ESA defines a “state of emergency” as the duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state caused by conditions such as air pollution, fire, flood, storm, epidemic, riot, drought, cyberterrorism, sudden and severe energy shortage, (deenergization event – specifically only for a local emergency), electromagnetic pulse attack, plant or animal infestation or disease, the Governor’s warning of an earthquake or volcanic prediction, or an earthquake, or other conditions, other than conditions resulting from a labor controversy or conditions causing a “state of war emergency,” which, by reason of their magnitude, are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of any single county, city and county, or city and require the combined forces of a mutual aid region or regions to combat, or with respect to regulated energy utilities, a sudden and severe energy shortage requires extraordinary measures beyond the authority vested in the Public Utilities Commission.
The ESA grants the Governor certain special powers during a declared state of emergency, which are in addition to any other existing powers otherwise granted. For example, the ESA empowers the Governor to expend any appropriation for support of the ESA in order to carry out its provisions, as well as the authority to make, amend, and rescind orders and regulations necessary to carry out the ESA. The orders and regulations shall have the force and effect of law.
The ESA is generally considered to give a governor broad authority to declare a state of emergency or local emergency beyond the existing list of conditions. Specifically, the ESA states “other conditions, other than conditions resulting from a labor controversy or conditions causing a ‘state of war emergency,’ which, by reason of their magnitude, are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of any single county, city and county, or city and require the combined forces of a mutual aid region or regions to combat.”
To that end, Governor Newsom noted in his veto of AB 1403 (Levine, 2021) which would have added a “deenergization event” to the list of conditions constituting a state of emergency that the “legislation is unnecessary, as existing statute provides broad emergency authority when disaster conditions are met.”
There are currently 57 open state of emergency proclamations in California proclaimed by the Governor as of March 22, 2024. Event types for these states of emergency include: early February 2024 storms; the fire near downtown Los Angeles damaging a portion of the I-10 freeway; Humboldt Earthquake; extreme heat event from August 2022; drought; high winds; wildfire; and tree mortality.
With the nation’s largest population, and third largest land area among the states, California is culturally, ethnically, economically, ecologically, and politically diverse. California also faces numerous risks and threats to our people, property, economy, and environment and is prone to earthquakes, floods, significant wildfires, prolonged drought impacts, public health emergencies, cybersecurity attacks, agricultural and animal disasters, as well as threats to homeland security.
OES takes a proactive approach to addressing these risks, threats, and vulnerabilities that form the basis of its mission and has been tested through real events, as well as comprehensive exercises that help OES to maintain a state of readiness and to plan for and mitigate impacts.
Landslide. This bill proposes to add “landslide” to the list of conditions in the ESA noted above that constitute a state of emergency or a local emergency. The bill defines “landslide” to mean the movement of a mass of rock, debris, or earth down a slope under the direct influence of gravity that travels at a speed of at least one inch per year.
The California Department of Conservation tracks and maps landslides in California and provides regular updates on their internet website. In the 1970s, the California Geological Survey (CGS) prepared a series of “Geology for Planning” and “Environmental Geological Analysis” reports and maps for local agencies in urban areas. These products were designed to assist local agencies in urbanizing areas. These products were designed to assist local agencies in evaluating hazards and developing policies that consider landslide hazards as residential development spread into landslide-prone terrain.
Following the 1982 El Nino storms in the San Francisco Bay area, the Landslide Hazard Mapping Act mandated new maps to show landslides and landslide hazards. Landslide Hazard Identification Maps were prepared by CGS for use by local government planners from 1986 to 1995. A set of three to four maps was prepared for each map study area, usually encompassing a USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map. Current active landslide mapping programs at CGS, and their respective products, include: the Forest and Watershed Geology Program; Seismic Hazards Program; Highway Corridor Landslide Hazard Mapping; and technical reports and disaster response.
CGS regularly provides technical input and advice to OES during and immediately following major landslide events, and immediately following major wildfires in anticipation of post-fire debris flows. CGS provides brief reports on individual emergency response tasks to OES and local emergency response agencies to assist them in evaluating ongoing hazards and planning for recovery. Post-event reports and maps documenting landslide occurrences have been summarized as Open-File Reports, articles in California Geology magazine, and on CGS’s web pages.
CGS classifies landslides with a two-part designation. The designation captures both the type of material that failed and the type of movement that the failed material exhibited. Material types are broadly categorized as either rock or soil, or a combination of the two for complex movements. Rock refers to hard or firm bedrock that was intact and in place prior to slope movement. Soil, either residual or transported material, is used in the engineering sense to mean unconsolidated particles or poorly cemented rock or aggregates.
Soil is distinguished further on the basis of texture as debris (coarse fragments) or earth (fine fragments). The distinction between rock and soil, and the further distinction between debris and earth is most often based on interpretation of geomorphic characteristics within landslide deposits, but can also be inferred from geologic characteristics of the parent material described on maps or observed in the field.
According to CGS, landslide movements are interpreted from the geomorphic expression of the landslide deposit and source area, and are categorized as falls, topples, spreads, slides, or flows. Falls are masses of soil or rock that dislodge from steep slopes and free-fall, bounce, or roll downslope. Topples move by the forward pivoting of a mass around an axis below the displaced mass. Lateral spreads, commonly induced by liquefaction of material in an earthquake, move by horizontal extension and shear or tensile fractures.
Slides displace masses of material along one or more discrete planes. In rotational sliding the slide plane is curved and the mass rotates backwards around an axis parallel to the slope; in translational sliding the failure surface is more or less planar and the mass moves parallel to the ground surface. Flows mobilize as a deforming, viscous mass without a discrete failure plane. More than one form of movement may occur during a failure, in which case the movement is classified as complex if movements occur sequentially and composite if they do not.
This bill defines “landslide” to mean the movement of a mass of rock, debris, or earth down a slope under the direct influence of gravity that travels at a speed of less than one inch per year.
But Time Makes You Bolder. In recent years, and with varying levels of success, legislators have attempted to expand the conditions constituting a state of emergency or local emergency. For example, SB 468 (Dodd, Chapter 537, Statutes of 2022) added “electromagnetic pulse attack” to the list of conditions constituting a state of emergency or a local emergency, and SB 52 (Dodd, Chapter 597, Statutes of 2021) added “deenergization event” to the list of conditions constituting a local emergency.
Alternatively, Governor Newsom vetoed AB 1403 (Levine, 2021), writing that the “bill would specify that conditions constituting a state of emergency under the California Emergency Services Act may include a deenergization event, defined as a planned power outage. This legislation is unnecessary, as existing statute provides broad emergency authority when disaster conditions are met.”
Additionally, SB 1455 (Hertzburg, 2020) which would have added “electromagnetic pulse attack” to the list of conditions was never referred out of the Senate Rules Committee, and AB 2306 (Donnelly, 2012) which would have added “border security,” failed passage in the Assembly Governmental Organization Committee.
AB 1786 (Rodriguez, 2024) of this year proposes to further add “climate change” and “climate change exacerbated conditions” to the list of conditions for which a state of emergency or local emergency may be proclaimed.
It is important to keep in mind that the conditions listed in the ESA, which this bill seeks to expand, are not exhaustive or intended to be the only conditions that can be used by the Governor to declare a state of emergency or local emergency.
Policy Considerations. As drafted, this bill includes the following definition of a landslide:
“Landslide” means the movement of a mass of rock, debris, or earth down a slope under the direct influence of gravity that travels at a speed of at least one inch per year.
If this bill were to be chaptered, this would be the first time a definition is included and attached to one of the conditions constituting a state of emergency or a local emergency. Further, the introduction of a definition might not only be unnecessary but could also lead to challenges in the practical application of the ESA.
The existing broad authority granted by the ESA allows for a flexible response to a wide range of emergency situations, including those not explicitly listed. By specifying a detailed definition for landslides, this flexibility could be inadvertently restricted, potentially leading to delays or complications in declaring a state of emergency for incidents that technically fall outside the defined parameters but nevertheless pose significant risks.
Moreover, the definition as proposed seems to conflate the terms "landslide" and "creep," potentially leading to confusion. Geologically, "creep" refers to the slow, gradual movement of soil or debris down a slope, typically occurring at the rates specified in the bill (at least one inch per year). In contrast, landslides are generally understood to involve a much faster movement of earth materials, often triggered by specific events like heavy rains or earthquakes. This distinction is critical for emergency management, as the response strategies and potential impacts on public safety and infrastructure can vary significantly between slow-moving creeps and rapid landslides.
Should this bill move forward, the author may wish to reconsider how to define “landslide,” and/or whether or not the definition belongs here and simply remove it instead.
Prior/Related Legislation
AB 1786 (Rodriguez, 2024) among other things, adds “climate change” and “climate change exacerbated conditions” to the list of conditions for which a state of emergency or local emergency may be proclaimed. (Pending in the Assembly Emergency Management Committee)
SB 468 (Dodd, Chapter 537, Statutes of 2022) added “electromagnetic pulse attack” to the list of conditions constituting a state of emergency or local emergency.
SB 52 (Dodd, Chapter 597, Statutes of 2021) added a “deenergization event” to the list of those conditions constituting a local emergency, with prescribed limitations.
AB 1403 (Levine, 2021) would have added “deenergization event” to the list of conditions constituting a state of emergency and local emergency, as specified. (Vetoed by Governor Newsom)
SB 1455 (Hertzberg, 2020) would have added “electromagnetic pulse attack” to the list of conditions constituting a state of emergency or local emergency. (Never referred by the Senate Rules Committee)
AB 2178 (Levine, 2020) would have included “deenergization” defined as a planned public safety power shutoff, as specified, to the list of conditions constituting a state of emergency and local emergency. (Never heard in the Senate Governmental Organization Committee)
SB 231 (Galgiani, 2019) would have revised the definition of a local emergency to include conditions of disaster or extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the territorial limits of a district established under the Harbors and Navigation Code, as specified. (Never heard in the Senate Governmental Organization Committee)
SB 531 (Galgiani, 2017) would have revised the definition of a local emergency to include conditions of disaster or extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the territorial limits of a district established under the Harbors and Navigation Code, as specified. (Vetoed by Governor Brown)
SB 532 (Dodd, Chapter 557, Statutes of 2017) added “cyberterrorism” to the list of conditions constituting a state of emergency and a local emergency.
AB 2306 (Donnelly, 2012) would have added “border security” to the list of conditions that constitute a state of emergency or local emergency for purposes of the ESA. (Failed passage in the Assembly Governmental Organization Committee)
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: Fiscal Com.: Local:
SUPPORT:
None received
OPPOSITION:
None received
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):