Bills

AB 1345: Cartwright Act: restraint of trade.

  • Session Year: 2025-2026
  • House: Assembly
  • Latest Version Date: 2025-04-07

Current Status:

Failed

(2026-02-02: From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.)

Introduced

In Committee

Awaiting First Chamber Vote

Passed First Chamber

In Committee

Awaiting Second Chamber Vote

Passed Second Chamber

Enacted

What does this bill do?

The bill adds a new law making it illegal for one or more people or companies to take actions that restrain trade or to monopolize (control sellers) or monopsonize (control buyers) markets, affecting businesses, employers, and workers in California. It makes attempts, maintaining, or conspiring to monopolize or monopsonize unlawful. It also says restraint of trade includes any action already covered under Section 16720.

The summary is provided by generative AI which can make mistakes. For original language, please view the details in the table below.

Version:

Existing law establishes the Attorney General as the head of the Department of Justice, with charge of all legal matters in which the state is interested, except as specified. Existing law imposes various requirements on the Attorney General related to consumer protection, including, among others, the supervision of charitable trusts and the enforcement of antitrust laws. Existing law, known as the Cartwright Act, identifies certain acts that are unlawful restraints of trade and unlawful trusts. Under existing law, a violation of the Cartwright Act is punishable as a crime.

This bill would provide that is unlawful for one or more persons to act, cause, take, or direct a measure, action, or event that is either in restraint of trade, as specified, or to monopolize or monopsonize, as specified. Because the bill would expand the scope of activities punishable as a crime under the Cartwight Act, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would make related findings and declarations.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Existing law establishes the Business and Professions Code and prescribes general provisions for purposes of its interpretation.This bill would make nonsubstantive changes to those provisions.
Authors shown for version:
Amended Assembly (4/7/2025)

Bill Author