AB 1883: Workplace surveillance tools.
- Session Year: 2025-2026
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2026-08-21
Current Status:
In Progress
(2026-08-30: Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling.)
Introduced
In Committee
Awaiting First Chamber Vote
Passed First Chamber
In Committee
Awaiting Second Chamber Vote
Passed Second Chamber
Enacted
Existing law establishes the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement within the Department of Industrial Relations. Existing law authorizes the division, which is headed by the Labor Commissioner, to enforce the Labor Code and all labor laws of the state, the enforcement of which is not specifically vested in any other officer, board, or commission.
This bill would, with certain exceptions, prohibit an employer from using a workplace surveillance tool that uses artificial intelligence to, among other things, collect neural data or recognize an individuals emotional state. The bill would define an employer to include a governmental entity, including, among other entities, charter cities and the University of California.
This bill would require authorize the Labor Commissioner or a public prosecutor to enforce the bills provisions and would authorize a public prosecutor to enforce the provisions. provisions. The bill would subject an employer who violates the bills provisions to a civil penalty of up to $500 for each violation. The bill would define various terms for purposes of its provisions.
This bill would exempt from its provisions an employers use of a workplace surveillance tool in specified operations where the use of the a workplace surveillance tool is reasonable necessary to comply with a federal statute, federal regulation, or binding federal contract relating to the development of aircraft for use in the national airspace or the development of products or services for national security, military, space, or defense purposes.
The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.
Discussed in Hearing