AB 2495: Unlawful immigration-related practices.
- Session Year: 2025-2026
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2026-08-13
Current Status:
In Progress
(2026-08-13: Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.)
Introduced
In Committee
Awaiting First Chamber Vote
Passed First Chamber
In Committee
Awaiting Second Chamber Vote
Passed Second Chamber
Enacted
Existing law prohibits an employer or any other person from engaging in, or directing another person to engage in, an unfair immigration-related practice against a person for the purpose of, or with the intent of, retaliating against any person for exercising a right protected under state labor and employment laws or under a local ordinance applicable to employees, as specified.
Existing law authorizes a civil action for equitable relief and damages or penalties, as specified, by an employee or other person who is the subject of an unfair immigration-related practice.
This bill would expand the above-described prohibition to include retaliating against any person for exercising any right under any local, state, or federal statute or regulation applicable to employees employees, as defined, and would prohibit preventing a person from exercising such a right. The bill would also prohibit an employer or any other person from engaging in any other conduct, related to any persons perceived immigration status, that would reasonably tend to dissuade an employee a person from engaging in conduct that the employee person has a legal right to engage in under any local, state, or federal statute or regulation applicable to employees, or to induce an employee a person to engage in conduct that the employee person has a legal right to abstain from under any local, state, or federal statute or regulation applicable to employees. The bill would make an employer or other person who violates these provisions liable for a civil penalty not exceeding $10,000 per employee or person for each violation, as specified. The bill would also make related and conforming changes to these provisions.
Discussed in Hearing