AB 260: Sexual and reproductive health care.
- Session Year: 2025-2026
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2025-09-26
Current Status:
Passed
(2025-09-26: Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 136, Statutes of 2025.)
Introduced
In Committee
Awaiting First Chamber Vote
Passed First Chamber
In Committee
Awaiting Second Chamber Vote
Passed Second Chamber
Enacted
(1)The California Constitution provides for the fundamental rights of privacy and to choose to have an abortion. Existing law, the Reproductive Privacy Act, prohibits the state from denying or interfering with a pregnant persons right to choose or obtain an abortion before the viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the pregnant person. Existing law prohibits conditions or restrictions from being imposed on abortion access for incarcerated persons and committed juveniles. Existing laws requiring parental consent for abortion and making assisting in or advertising abortion a crime have been held to be unconstitutional.
This bill would repeal those unconstitutional provisions and delete obsolete references to criminal abortion penalties. The bill would make technical changes to provisions authorizing abortion for incarcerated and committed persons.
(2)Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, provides for labeling requirements of drugs and devices. The Pharmacy Law requires a pharmacist to dispense a prescription in a container that is correctly labeled with specified information, including the name of the prescriber and the name address of the pharmacy. A violation of the Pharmacy Law is a misdemeanor.
This bill would authorize the State Department of Public Health to adopt regulations to include or exclude mifepristone and other medication abortion drugs from the requirements of the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, but would exclude the drugs from those requirements if the drugs are no longer approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as specified. The bill would authorize a pharmacist to dispense mifepristone or other drug used for medication abortion without the name of the patient, the name of the prescriber, or the name and address of the pharmacy, subject to specified requirements. The bill would require the pharmacist to maintain a log, as specified, that is not open to inspection by law enforcement without a subpoena, and would prohibit the disclosure of the information to an individual or entity from another state. The bill would prohibit criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a pharmacist for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in specified other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs, and would prohibit the California State Board of Pharmacy from denying an application for licensure or taking disciplinary action against an applicant or licensee for engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs. By expanding the scope of a crime under the Pharmacy Law, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3)Existing law establishes various healing arts boards in the Department of Consumer Affairs that license and regulate various healing arts licensees.
This bill would prohibit subjecting a healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs to civil, criminal, disciplinary, or other administrative action for prescribing, furnishing, ordering, or administering mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy under federal law, as specified. The bill would state that the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the authority of a healing arts practitioner to take specified actions relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs are against the public policy of this state. The bill would prohibit criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing actions against an applicant or licensee for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs.
(4)Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of clinics and health facilities by the State Department of Public Health.
This bill would prohibit criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensed clinic or health facility for transporting or engaging in certain other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs that are lawful in California. The bill would prohibit the department from denying an application for licensure or taking disciplinary action against an applicant or licensee for engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs.
(5)Existing law prohibits a health care provider from knowingly disclosing, transmitting, transferring, sharing or granting access to identifiable medical information related to an individual seeking, obtaining, providing, supporting, or aiding in the performance of an abortion that is lawful under the laws of this state, as specified and subject to specified exclusions. Existing law exempts a health care provider from liability for damages or from civil or enforcement actions for failing to comply this prohibition before January 31, 2026, if the health care provider is working diligently and in good faith to comply with the prohibition.
This bill would exempt a health care provider from liability for damages or from civil or enforcement actions for an additional year, until January 31, 2027.
(6)Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of disability and health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law prohibits a health care service plan contract or a group or individual disability insurance policy or certificate that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage of a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA. Existing law prohibits a contract between a health care service plan or health insurer and a health care services provider from containing any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider based on a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or another professional disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is solely based on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California. Existing law also prohibits a health care service plan or health insurer from discriminating against a licensed provider solely on the basis of a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or another professional disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is solely based on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California.
This bill would prohibit a health care service plan contract or a group or individual health insurance policy or certificate that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern. The bill would require those contracts and policies to include coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, even if it has not been approved by the FDA if specified requirements are met, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern. The bill would prohibit a plan or insurer from contracting with a health care services provider to terminate or nonrenew the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, or from discriminating against a licensed provider, for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs that are lawful in California. Because a violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(7)This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by AB 1503 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1503 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
(8)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(9)This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
(1)The California Constitution provides for the fundamental rights of privacy and to choose to have an abortion. Existing law, the Reproductive Privacy Act, prohibits the state from denying or interfering with a pregnant persons right to choose or obtain an abortion before the viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the pregnant person. Existing law prohibits conditions or restrictions from being imposed on abortion access for incarcerated persons and committed juveniles. Existing laws requiring parental consent for abortion and making assisting in or advertising abortion a crime have been held to be unconstitutional.
This bill would repeal those unconstitutional provisions and delete obsolete references to criminal abortion penalties. The bill would make technical changes to provisions authorizing abortion for incarcerated and committed persons.
(2)Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, provides for labeling requirements of drugs and devices. The Pharmacy Law requires a pharmacist to dispense a prescription in a container that is correctly labeled with specified information, including the name of the prescriber and the name address of the pharmacy. A violation of the Pharmacy Law is a misdemeanor.
This bill would authorize the State Department of Public Health to adopt regulations to include or exclude mifepristone and other medication abortion drugs from the requirements of the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, but would exclude the drugs from those requirements if the drugs are no longer approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as specified. The bill would authorize a pharmacist to dispense mifepristone or other drug used for medication abortion without the name of the patient, the name of the prescriber, or the name and address of the pharmacy, subject to specified requirements. The bill would require the pharmacist to maintain a log, as specified, that is not open to inspection by law enforcement without a subpoena, and would prohibit the disclosure of the information to an individual or entity from another state. The bill would prohibit criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a pharmacist for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in specified other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs, and would prohibit the California State Board of Pharmacy from denying an application for licensure or taking disciplinary action against an applicant or licensee for engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs. By expanding the scope of a crime under the Pharmacy Law, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3)Existing law establishes various healing arts boards in the Department of Consumer Affairs that license and regulate various healing arts licensees.
This bill would prohibit subjecting a healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs to civil, criminal, disciplinary, or other administrative action for prescribing, furnishing, ordering, or administering mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy under federal law, as specified. The bill would state that the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the authority of a healing arts practitioner to take specified actions relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs are against the public policy of this state. The bill would prohibit criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing actions against an applicant or licensee for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs.
(4)Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of clinics and health facilities by the State Department of Public Health.
This bill would prohibit criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensed clinic or health facility for transporting or engaging in certain other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs that are lawful in California. The bill would prohibit the department from denying an application for licensure or taking disciplinary action against an applicant or licensee for engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs.
(5)Existing law prohibits a health care provider from knowingly disclosing, transmitting, transferring, sharing or granting access to identifiable medical information related to an individual seeking, obtaining, providing, supporting, or aiding in the performance of an abortion that is lawful under the laws of this state, as specified and subject to specified exclusions. Existing law exempts a health care provider from liability for damages or from civil or enforcement actions for failing to comply this prohibition before January 31, 2026, if the health care provider is working diligently and in good faith to comply with the prohibition.
This bill would exempt a health care provider from liability for damages or from civil or enforcement actions for an additional year, until January 31, 2027.
(6)Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of disability and health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law prohibits a health care service plan contract or a group or individual disability insurance policy or certificate that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage of a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA. Existing law prohibits a contract between a health care service plan or health insurer and a health care services provider from containing any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider based on a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or another professional disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is solely based on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California. Existing law also prohibits a health care service plan or health insurer from discriminating against a licensed provider solely on the basis of a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or another professional disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is solely based on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California.
This bill would prohibit a health care service plan contract or a group or individual health insurance policy or certificate that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern. The bill would require those contracts and policies to include coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, even if it has not been approved by the FDA if specified requirements are met, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern. The bill would prohibit a plan or insurer from contracting with a health care services provider to terminate or nonrenew the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, or from discriminating against a licensed provider, for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs that are lawful in California. Because a violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(7)This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by AB 1503 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1503 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
(8)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(9)This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
(1)The California Constitution provides for the fundamental rights of privacy and to choose to have an abortion. Existing law, the Reproductive Privacy Act, prohibits the state from denying or interfering with a pregnant persons right to choose or obtain an abortion before the viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the pregnant person. Existing law prohibits conditions or restrictions from being imposed on abortion access for incarcerated persons and committed juveniles. Existing laws requiring parental consent for abortion and making assisting in or advertising abortion a crime have been held to be unconstitutional.
This bill would repeal those unconstitutional provisions and delete obsolete references to criminal abortion penalties. The bill would make technical changes to provisions authorizing abortion for incarcerated and committed persons.
(2)Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, provides for labeling requirements of drugs and devices. The Pharmacy Law requires a pharmacist to dispense a prescription in a container that is correctly labeled with specified information, including the name of the prescriber and the name address of the pharmacy. A violation of the Pharmacy Law is a misdemeanor.
This bill would authorize the State Department of Public Health to adopt regulations to include or exclude mifepristone and other medication abortion drugs from the requirements of the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, but would exclude the drugs from those requirements if the drugs are no longer approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as specified. The bill would authorize a pharmacist to dispense mifepristone or other drug used for medication abortion without the name of the patient, the name of the prescriber, or the name and address of the pharmacy, subject to specified requirements. The bill would require the pharmacist to maintain a log, as specified, that is not open to inspection by law enforcement without a subpoena, and would prohibit the disclosure of the information to an individual or entity from another state. The bill would prohibit criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a pharmacist for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in specified other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs, and would prohibit the California State Board of Pharmacy from denying an application for licensure or taking disciplinary action against an applicant or licensee for engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs. By expanding the scope of a crime under the Pharmacy Law, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3)Existing law establishes various healing arts boards in the Department of Consumer Affairs that license and regulate various healing arts licensees.
This bill would prohibit subjecting a healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs to civil, criminal, disciplinary, or other administrative action for prescribing, furnishing, ordering, or administering mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy under federal law, as specified. The bill would state that the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the authority of a healing arts practitioner to take specified actions relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs are against the public policy of this state. The bill would prohibit criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing actions against an applicant or licensee for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs.
(4)Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of clinics and health facilities by the State Department of Public Health.
This bill would prohibit criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensed clinic or health facility for transporting or engaging in certain other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs that are lawful in California. The bill would prohibit the department from denying an application for licensure or taking disciplinary action against an applicant or licensee for engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs.
(5)Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law regulates the departments certification of enrolled Medi-Cal providers. Under existing law, in-person, face-to-face contact is not required to provide services under the Medi-Cal program, as specified, but existing law generally prohibits a provider from establishing a new patient relationship with a Medi-Cal beneficiary via asynchronous store and forward, telephonic synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other virtual communication modalities.This bill would require the department to update the Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirement and procedures for remote service providers who offer reproductive health care services primarily through telehealth modalities, as specified, and to permit the use of a cellular telephone as the primary business phone for reproductive health care providers. The bill would authorize a health care provider to establish a new patient relationship using asynchronous store and forward if the visit is related to reproductive health care services and meets specified requirements.(5)Existing law prohibits a health care provider from knowingly disclosing, transmitting, transferring, sharing or granting access to identifiable medical information related to an individual seeking, obtaining, providing, supporting, or aiding in the performance of an abortion that is lawful under the laws of this state, as specified and subject to specified exclusions. Existing law exempts a health care provider from liability for damages or from civil or enforcement actions for failing to comply this prohibition before January 31, 2026, if the health care provider is working diligently and in good faith to comply with the prohibition.
This bill would exempt a health care provider from liability for damages or from civil or enforcement actions for an additional year, until January 31, 2027.
(6)Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of disability and health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law prohibits a health care service plan contract or a group or individual disability insurance policy or certificate that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage of a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA. Existing law prohibits a contract between a health care service plan or health insurer and a health care services provider from containing any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider based on a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or another professional disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is solely based on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California. Existing law also prohibits a health care service plan or health insurer from discriminating against a licensed provider solely on the basis of a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or another professional disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is solely based on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California.
This bill would prohibit a health care service plan contract or a group or individual health insurance policy or certificate that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern. The bill would require those contracts and policies to include coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, even if it has not been approved by the FDA if specified requirements are met, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern. The bill would prohibit a plan or insurer from contracting with a health care services provider to terminate or nonrenew the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, or from discriminating against a licensed provider, for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs that are lawful in California. Because a violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(7)This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by AB 1503 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1503 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
(7)(8)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(8)(9)This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
(1)The California Constitution provides for the fundamental rights of privacy and to choose to have an abortion. Existing law, the Reproductive Privacy Act, prohibits the state from denying or interfering with a pregnant persons right to choose or obtain an abortion before the viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the pregnant person. Existing law prohibits conditions or restrictions from being imposed on abortion access for incarcerated persons and committed juveniles. Existing laws requiring parental consent for abortion and making assisting in or advertising abortion a crime have been held to be unconstitutional.
This bill would repeal those unconstitutional provisions and delete obsolete references to criminal abortion penalties. The bill would make technical changes to provisions authorizing abortion for incarcerated and committed persons.
(2)Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, provides for labeling requirements of drugs and devices. The Pharmacy Law requires a pharmacist to dispense a prescription in a container that is correctly labeled with specified information, including the name of the prescriber and the name address of the pharmacy. A violation of the Pharmacy Law is a misdemeanor.
This bill would authorize the State Department of Public Health to adopt regulations to include or exclude mifepristone and other medication abortion drugs from the requirements of the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, but would exclude the drugs from those requirements if the drugs are no longer approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as specified. The bill would authorize a pharmacist to dispense mifepristone or other drug used for medication abortion without the name of the patient, the name of the prescriber, or the name and address of the pharmacy, subject to specified requirements. The bill would require the pharmacist to maintain a log, as specified, that is not open to inspection by law enforcement without a subpoena, and would prohibit the disclosure of the information to an individual or entity from another state. The bill would prohibit criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a pharmacist for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in specified other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs, and would prohibit the California State Board of Pharmacy from denying an application for licensure or taking disciplinary action against an applicant or licensee for engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs. By expanding the scope of a crime under the Pharmacy Law, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3)Existing law establishes various healing arts boards in the Department of Consumer Affairs that license and regulate various healing arts licensees.
This bill would prohibit subjecting a healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs to civil, criminal, disciplinary, or other administrative action for prescribing, furnishing, ordering, or administering mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy under federal law, as specified. The bill would state that the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the authority of a healing arts practitioner to take specified actions relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs are against the public policy of this state. The bill would prohibit criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing actions against an applicant or licensee for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs.
(4)Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of clinics and health facilities by the State Department of Public Health.
This bill would prohibit criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensed clinic or health facility for transporting or engaging in certain other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs that are lawful in California. The bill would prohibit the department from denying an application for licensure or taking disciplinary action against an applicant or licensee for engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs.
(5)Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law regulates the departments certification of enrolled Medi-Cal providers. Under existing law, in-person, face-to-face contact is not required to provide services under the Medi-Cal program, as specified, but existing law generally prohibits a provider from establishing a new patient relationship with a Medi-Cal beneficiary via asynchronous store and forward, telephonic synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other virtual communication modalities.
This bill would require the department to update the Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirement and procedures for remote service providers who offer reproductive health care services primarily through telehealth modalities, as specified, and to permit the use of a cellular telephone as the primary business phone for reproductive health care providers. The bill would authorize a health care provider to establish a new patient relationship using asynchronous store and forward if the visit is related to reproductive health care services and meets specified requirements.
(6)Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of disability and health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law prohibits a health care service plan contract or a group or individual disability insurance policy or certificate that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage of a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA. Existing law prohibits a contract between a health care service plan or health insurer and a health care services provider from containing any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider based on a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or another professional disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is solely based on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California. Existing law also prohibits a health care service plan or health insurer from discriminating against a licensed provider solely on the basis of a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or another professional disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is solely based on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California.
This bill would prohibit a health care service plan contract or a group or individual disability health insurance policy or certificate that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern. The bill would require those contracts and policies to include coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, even if it has not been approved by the FDA if specified requirements are met, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern. The bill would prohibit a plan or insurer from contracting with a health care services provider to terminate or nonrenew the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, or from discriminating against a licensed provider, for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs that are lawful in California. Because a violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(7)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(8)This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
(1)The California Constitution provides for the fundamental rights of privacy and to choose to have an abortion. Existing law, the Reproductive Privacy Act, prohibits the state from denying or interfering with a pregnant persons right to choose or obtain an abortion before the viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the pregnant person. Existing law prohibits conditions or restrictions from being imposed on abortion access for incarcerated persons and committed juveniles. Existing laws requiring parental consent for abortion and making assisting in or advertising abortion a crime have been held to be unconstitutional.
This bill would repeal those unconstitutional provisions and delete obsolete references to criminal abortion penalties. The bill would make technical changes to provisions authorizing abortion for incarcerated and committed persons.
(2)Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, provides for labeling requirements of drugs and devices. The Pharmacy Law requires a pharmacist to dispense a prescription in a container that is correctly labeled with specified information, including the name of the prescriber and the name address of the pharmacy. A violation of the Pharmacy Law is a misdemeanor.
This bill would authorize the State Department of Public Health to adopt regulations to include or exclude mifepristone and other medication abortion drugs from the requirements of the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, but would exclude the drugs from those requirements if the drugs are no longer approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (FDA), as specified. The bill would authorize a pharmacist to dispense mifepristone or other drug used for medication abortion without the name of the patient, the name of the prescriber, or the name and address of the pharmacy, subject to specified requirements. The bill would require the pharmacist to maintain a log, as specified, that is not open to inspection by law enforcement without a subpoena, and would prohibit the disclosure of the information to an individual or entity from another state. The bill would prohibit criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a pharmacist for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in specified other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs, and would prohibit the California State Board of Pharmacy from denying an application for licensure or taking disciplinary action against an applicant or licensee for engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs. By expanding the scope of a crime under the Pharmacy Law, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3)Existing law establishes various healing arts boards in the Department of Consumer Affairs that license and regulate various healing arts licensees.
This bill would prohibit subjecting a healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs to civil, criminal, disciplinary, or other administrative action for prescribing, furnishing, ordering, or administering mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy under federal law, as specified. The bill would state that the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the authority of a healing arts practitioner to take specified actions relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs are against the public policy of this state. The bill would prohibit criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing actions against an applicant or licensee for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs.
(4)Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of clinics and health facilities by the State Department of Public Health.
This bill would prohibit criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensed clinic or health facility for manufacturing, transporting, transporting or engaging in certain other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs that are lawful in California. The bill would prohibit the department from denying an application for licensure or taking disciplinary action against an applicant or licensee for engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs.
(5)Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law regulates the departments certification of enrolled Medi-Cal providers. Under existing law, in-person, face-to-face contact is not required to provide services under the Medi-Cal program, as specified, but existing law generally prohibits a provider from establishing a new patient relationship with a Medi-Cal beneficiary via asynchronous store and forward, telephonic synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other virtual communication modalities.
This bill would require the department to update the Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirement and procedures for remote service providers who offer reproductive health care services exclusively primarily through telehealth modalities, as specified, and to permit the use of a cellular telephone as the primary business phone for reproductive health care providers. The bill would authorize a health care provider to establish a new patient relationship using asynchronous store and forward if the visit is related to reproductive health care services and meets specified requirements.
(6)Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of disability and health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law prohibits a health care service plan contract or a group or individual disability insurance policy or certificate that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage of a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA. Existing law prohibits a contract between a health care service plan or health insurer and a health care services provider from containing any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider based on a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or another professional disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is solely based on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California. Existing law also prohibits a health care service plan or health insurer from discriminating against a licensed provider solely on the basis of a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or another professional disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is solely based on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California.
This bill would prohibit a health care service plan contract or a group or individual disability insurance policy or certificate that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, regardless of its FDA approval status or mifepristone solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern. The bill would require those contracts and policies to include coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, even if it has not been approved by the FDA if specified requirements are met, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern. The bill would prohibit a plan or insurer from contracting with a health care services provider to terminate or nonrenew the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, or from discriminating against a licensed provider, for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs that are lawful in California. Because a violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(7)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(1)The California Constitution provides for the fundamental rights of privacy and to choose to have an abortion. Existing law, the Reproductive Privacy Act, prohibits the state from denying or interfering with a pregnant persons right to choose or obtain an abortion before the viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the pregnant person. Existing law prohibits conditions or restrictions from being imposed on abortion access for incarcerated persons and committed juveniles. Existing laws requiring parental consent for abortion and making assisting in or advertising abortion a crime have been held to be unconstitutional.
This bill would repeal those unconstitutional provisions and delete obsolete references to criminal abortion penalties. The bill would make technical changes to provisions authorizing abortion for incarcerated and committed persons.
(2)Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, provides for labeling requirements of drugs and devices. The Pharmacy Law requires a pharmacist to dispense a prescription in a container that is correctly labeled with specified information, including the name of the prescriber and the name address of the pharmacy. A violation of the Pharmacy Law is a misdemeanor.
This bill would authorize the State Department of Public Health to adopt regulations to include or exclude mifepristone and other medication abortion drugs from the requirements of the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, but would exclude the drugs from those requirements if the drugs are no longer approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The bill would authorize a pharmacist to dispense mifepristone or other drug used for medication abortion without the name of the prescriber patient, the name of the prescriber, or the name and address of the pharmacy, subject to specified requirements. The bill would require the pharmacist to maintain a log, as specified, that is not open to inspection by law enforcement without a subpoena, and would prohibit the disclosure of the information to an individual or entity from another state. The bill would prohibit criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a pharmacist for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in specified other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs, and would prohibit the California State Board of Pharmacy from denying an application for licensure or taking disciplinary action against an applicant or licensee for engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs. By expanding the scope of a crime under the Pharmacy Law, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3)Existing law establishes various healing arts boards in the Department of Consumer Affairs that license and regulate various healing arts licensees.
This bill would prohibit subjecting a healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs to civil, criminal, disciplinary, or other administrative action for prescribing, furnishing, ordering, or administering mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy under federal law, as specified. The bill would state that the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the authority of a healing arts practitioner to take specified actions relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs are against the public policy of this state. The bill would prohibit criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing actions against an applicant or licensee for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs.
(4)Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of clinics and health facilities by the State Department of Public Health.
This bill would prohibit criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensed clinic or health facility for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs that are lawful in California. The bill would prohibit the department from denying an application for licensure or taking disciplinary action against an applicant or licensee for engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs.
(5)Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law regulates the departments certification of enrolled Medi-Cal providers. Under existing law, in-person, face-to-face contact is not required to provide services under the Medi-Cal program, as specified, but existing law generally prohibits a provider from establishing a new patient relationship with a Medi-Cal beneficiary via asynchronous store and forward, telephonic synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other virtual communication modalities.
This bill would require the department to update the Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirement and procedures for remote service providers who offer reproductive health care services exclusively through telehealth modalities, as specified, and to permit the use of a cellular telephone as the primary business phone for reproductive health care providers. The bill would authorize a health care provider to establish a new patient relationship using asynchronous store and forward if the visit is related to reproductive health care services and meets specified requirements.
(6)Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of disability and health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law prohibits a health care service plan contract or a group or individual disability insurance policy or certificate that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage of a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA. Existing law prohibits a contract between a health care service plan or health insurer and a health care services provider from containing any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider based on a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or another professional disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is solely based on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California. Existing law also prohibits a health care service plan or health insurer from discriminating against a licensed provider solely on the basis of a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or another professional disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is solely based on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California.
This bill would prohibit a health care service plan contract or a group or individual disability insurance policy or certificate that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, regardless of its FDA approval status or solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern. The bill would prohibit a plan or insurer from contracting with a health care services provider to terminate or nonrenew the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, or from discriminating against a licensed provider, for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs that are lawful in California. Because a violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(7)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(1)The California Constitution provides for the fundamental rights of privacy and to choose to have an abortion. Existing law, the Reproductive Privacy Act, prohibits the state from denying or interfering with a pregnant persons right to choose or obtain an abortion before the viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the pregnant person. Existing law prohibits conditions or restrictions from being imposed on abortion access for incarcerated persons and committed juveniles. Existing laws requiring parental consent for abortion and making assisting in or advertising abortion a crime have been held to be unconstitutional.
This bill would repeal those unconstitutional provisions and delete obsolete references to criminal abortion penalties. The bill would make technical changes to provisions authorizing abortion for incarcerated and committed persons.
(2)Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, provides for labeling requirements of drugs and devices. The Pharmacy Law requires a pharmacist to dispense a prescription in a container that is correctly labeled with specified information, including the name of the prescriber and the name address of the pharmacy. A violation of the Pharmacy Law is a misdemeanor.
This bill would authorize the State Department of Public Health to adopt regulations to include or exclude mifepristone and other medication abortion drugs from the requirements of the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, but would exclude the drugs from those requirements if the drugs are no longer approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The bill would authorize a pharmacist to dispense mifepristone or other drug used for medication abortion without the name of the prescriber or the name and address of the pharmacy, subject to specified requirements. The bill would require the pharmacist to maintain a log, as specified, that is not open to inspection by law enforcement without a subpoena, and would prohibit the disclosure of the information to an individual or entity from another state. The bill would prohibit criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a pharmacist for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in specified other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs, and would prohibit the California State Board of Pharmacy from denying an application for licensure or taking disciplinary action against an applicant or licensee for engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs. By expanding the scope of a crime under the Pharmacy Law, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3)Existing law establishes various healing arts boards in the Department of Consumer Affairs that license and regulate various healing arts licensees.
This bill would prohibit subjecting a healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs to civil, criminal, disciplinary, or other administrative action for prescribing, furnishing, ordering, or administering mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy under federal law, as specified. The bill would state that the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the authority of a healing arts practitioner to take specified actions relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs are against the public policy of this state. The bill would prohibit criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing actions against an applicant or licensee for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs.
(4)Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of clinics and health facilities by the State Department of Public Health.
This bill would prohibit criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensed clinic or health facility for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs that are lawful in California. The bill would prohibit the department from denying an application for licensure or taking disciplinary action against an applicant or licensee for engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs.
(5)Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law regulates the departments certification of enrolled Medi-Cal providers. Under existing law, in-person, face-to-face contact is not required to provide services under the Medi-Cal program, as specified, but existing law generally prohibits a provider from establishing a new patient relationship with a Medi-Cal beneficiary via asynchronous store and forward, telephonic synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other virtual communication modalities.
This bill would require the department to update the Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirement and procedures for remote service providers who offer reproductive health care services exclusively through telehealth modalities, as specified, and to permit the use of a cellular telephone as the primary business phone for reproductive health care providers. The bill would authorize a health care provider to establish a new patient relationship using asynchronous store and forward if the visit is related to reproductive health care services and meets specified requirements.
(6)Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of disability and health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law prohibits a health care service plan contract or a group or individual disability insurance policy or certificate that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage of a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA. Existing law prohibits a contract between a health care service plan or health insurer and a health care services provider from containing any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider based on a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or another professional disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is solely based on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California. Existing law also prohibits a health care service plan or health insurer from discriminating against a licensed provider solely on the basis of a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or another professional disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is solely based on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California.
This bill would prohibit a health care service plan contract or a group or individual disability insurance policy or certificate that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, regardless of its FDA approval status or solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern. The bill would prohibit a plan or insurer from contracting with a health care services provider to terminate or nonrenew the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, or from discriminating against a licensed provider, for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain other acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs that are lawful in California. Because a violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(7)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law establishes the Department of Health Care Access and Information to oversee and administer various health programs. Existing law establishes the California Reproductive Health Equity Program within the department to ensure abortion and contraception services are affordable for and accessible to all patients and to provide financial support for safety net providers of these services. Existing law establishes the California Reproductive Health Service Corps within the department for the purposes of recruiting, training, and retaining a diverse workforce of reproductive health care professionals who will be part of reproductive health care teams to work in underserved areas. Existing law defines reproductive health, for purposes of the corps, to mean health services relating to abortion care, sexual health counseling, contraception, sexually transmitted infections, reproductive tract infections, HIV, gynecology, perinatal care, midwifery care, gender-affirming care, and gender-based violence prevention.This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to ensure that patients can continue to access care, including abortion, gender-affirming care, and other sexual and reproductive health care in California, and to allow patients to access care through asynchronous modes.Existing law establishes the Department of Health Care Access and Information to oversee and administer various health programs. Existing law establishes the California Reproductive Health Equity Program within the department to ensure abortion and contraception services are affordable for and accessible to all patients and to provide financial support for safety net providers of these services.
Existing law establishes the California Reproductive Health Service Corps within the department for the purposes of recruiting, training, and retaining a diverse workforce of reproductive health care professionals who will be part of reproductive health care teams to work in underserved areas. Existing law defines reproductive health, for purposes of the corps, to mean health services relating to abortion care, sexual health counseling, contraception, sexually transmitted infections, reproductive tract infections, HIV, gynecology, perinatal care, midwifery care, gender-affirming care, and gender-based violence prevention.
This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to ensure that patients can continue to access care, including abortion, gender-affirming care, and other sexual and reproductive health care in California, and to allow patients to access care through asynchronous modes.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)It is the longstanding public policy of this state to promote access to reproductive health care, including abortion care, without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers. Every pregnant individual has the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, a right that is secured by the California Constitution.
(b)Recent federal action and litigation has raised uncertainty about the continued availability nationwide of mifepristone, a drug that has been clinically proven to be part of a safe and effective means of providing medication abortion.
(c)The continued attacks on reproductive freedom across the country require immediate action to protect the right to abortion access, including access to medication abortion, in California.
(d)The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the United States Supreme Court have long recognized states police powers and that direct control of medical practice in the states is beyond the power of federal government (Linder v. United States (1925) 268 U.S. 5, 18).
(e)It is the intent of the Legislature to ensure continued access to medication abortion that has been proven safe and effective for two decades in California for individuals seeking abortion care.
SEC. 2.Section 601 of the Business and Professions Code is repealed.SEC. 3.Section 687 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:687.(a)A healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs shall not be subject to a civil or criminal action or disciplinary or other administrative proceeding solely on the basis that the practitioner prescribed, furnished, ordered, or administered brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to Section 355-1 of Title 21 of the United States Code, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(b)Pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), the authority of a healing arts practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion is the practice of medicine, and the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the ability of a practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion if that action is lawful under the laws of the state, are against the public policy of this state.
SEC. 4.Section 850.3 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:850.3.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against an individual licensed or certified by a healing arts board concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)A healing arts board shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)A healing arts board shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee or health care practitioner subject to this division solely because the licensee or practitioner was convicted or disciplined in another state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
SEC. 5.Section 2519 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:2519.The board may suspend, revoke, or place on probation the license of a midwife for any of the following:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out the usual functions of a licensed midwife.
(2)Conviction of a violation of Section 2052, in which event, the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence thereof.
(3)The use of advertising that is fraudulent or misleading.
(4)Obtaining or possessing in violation of law, or prescribing, or except as directed by a licensed physician and surgeon, dentist, or podiatrist administering to themselves, or furnishing or administering to another, any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code or any dangerous drug as defined in Article 8 (commencing with Section 4210) of Chapter 9 of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code.
(5)The use of any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code, or any dangerous drug as defined in Article 8 (commencing with Section 4210) of Chapter 9 of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code, or alcoholic beverages, to an extent or in a manner dangerous or injurious to themselves, any other person, or the public, or to the extent that this use impairs their ability to conduct with safety to the public the practice authorized by their license.
(6)Conviction of a criminal offense involving the prescription, consumption, or self-administration of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), or the possession of, or falsification of, a record pertaining to, the substances described in paragraph (4), in which event the record of the conviction is conclusive evidence thereof.
(7)Commitment or confinement by a court of competent jurisdiction for intemperate use of or addiction to the use of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), in which event the court order of commitment or confinement is prima facie evidence of such commitment or confinement.
(8)Falsifying, or making grossly incorrect, grossly inconsistent, or unintelligible entries in any hospital, patient, or other record pertaining to the substances described in subdivision (a).
(b)Procuring a license by fraud or misrepresentation.
(c)Conviction of a crime substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a midwife, as determined by the board.
(d)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violation of, or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter.
(e)Making or giving any false statement or information in connection with the application for issuance of a license.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required under this chapter for the issuance of a license or a certificate.
(g)Impersonating another licensed practitioner, or permitting or allowing another person to use their license or certificate for the purpose of providing midwifery services.
(h)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of, or arranging for, a violation of any of the provisions of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2221) of Chapter 5.
(i) Failing to do any of the following when required pursuant to Section 2507:
(1)Consult with a physician and surgeon.
(2)Refer a client to a physician and surgeon.
(3)Transfer a client to a hospital.
SEC. 6.Section 2761 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:2761.The board may take disciplinary action against a certified or licensed nurse or deny an application for a certificate or license for any of the following:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(1)Incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out usual certified or licensed nursing functions.
(2)A conviction of practicing medicine without a license in violation of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000), in which event the record of conviction shall be conclusive evidence thereof.
(3)The use of advertising relating to nursing that violates Section 17500.
(4)Denial of licensure, revocation, suspension, restriction, or any other disciplinary action against a health care professional license or certificate by another state or territory of the United States, by any other government agency, or by another California health care professional licensing board. A certified copy of the decision or judgment shall be conclusive evidence of that action.
(b)Procuring their certificate or license by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
(c)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violating of, or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter or regulations adopted pursuant to it.
(d)Making or giving any false statement or information in connection with the application for issuance of a certificate or license.
(e)Conviction of a felony or of any offense substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a registered nurse, in which event the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence thereof.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required under this chapter for the issuance of a certificate or license.
(g)Impersonating another certified or licensed practitioner, or permitting or allowing another person to use their certificate or license for the purpose of nursing the sick or afflicted.
(h)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of, or arranging for, a violation of any of the provisions of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2220) of Chapter 5.
(i)Holding oneself out to the public or to any practitioner of the healing arts as a nurse practitioner or as meeting the standards established by the board for a nurse practitioner unless meeting the standards established by the board pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 2834) or holding oneself out to the public as being certified by the board as a nurse anesthetist, nurse midwife, clinical nurse specialist, or public health nurse unless the person is at the time certified by the board.
(j)(1)Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines of the board, thereby risking transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from licensed or certified nurse to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensed or certified nurse. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider referencing the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, guidelines, and regulations pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the Medical Board of California, the Podiatric Medical Board of California, the Dental Board of California, and the Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this subdivision.
(2)The board shall seek to ensure that licentiates and others regulated by the board are informed of the responsibility of licentiates to minimize the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from health care provider to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to health care provider, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risks of transmission.
SEC. 7.Section 2878 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:2878.The board may suspend or revoke a license issued under this chapter for any of the following:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:
(1)Incompetence, or gross negligence in carrying out usual nursing functions.
(2)A conviction of practicing medicine without a license in violation of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000), in which event the record of conviction shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction.
(3)The use of advertising relating to nursing which violates Section 17500.
(4)The use of excessive force upon or the mistreatment or abuse of any patient. For the purposes of this paragraph, excessive force means force clearly in excess of that which would normally be applied in similar clinical circumstances.
(5)The failure to maintain confidentiality of patient medical information, except as disclosure is otherwise permitted or required by law.
(6)Failure to report to the commission any act prohibited by this section.
(b)Procuring a certificate by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
(c)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violating of, or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter.
(d)Making or giving any false statement or information in connection with the application for issuance of a license.
(e)Conviction of a crime substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a licensed vocational nurse, in which event the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required under this chapter for the issuance of a license.
(g)Impersonating another practitioner, misrepresenting professional credentials or licensure status, or permitting another person to use the licensees certificate or license.
(h)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of or arranging for a violation of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2220) of Chapter 5.
(i)The commission of any act involving dishonesty, when that action is related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(j)The commission of any act punishable as a sexually related crime, if that act is substantially related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(k)Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines of the board, thereby risking transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from licensee to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensee. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider referencing the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, guidelines, and regulations pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the Medical Board of California, the Podiatric Medical Board of California, the Board of Dental Examiners, and the Board of Registered Nursing, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this subdivision.
(l)The board shall seek to ensure that licentiates and others regulated by the board are informed of the responsibility of licentiates and others to follow infection control guidelines, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases.
SEC. 8.Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:4076.(a)A pharmacist shall not dispense a prescription except in a container that meets the requirements of state and federal law and is correctly labeled with all of the following:
(1)Except when the prescriber or the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6 orders otherwise, either the manufacturers trade name of the drug or the generic name and the name of the manufacturer. Commonly used abbreviations may be used. Preparations containing two or more active ingredients may be identified by the manufacturers trade name or the commonly used name or the principal active ingredients.
(2)The directions for the use of the drug.
(3)The name of the patient or patients.
(4)The name of the prescriber or, if applicable, the name of the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6.
(5)The date of issue.
(6)The name and address of the pharmacy, and prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(7)The strength of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(8)The quantity of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(9)The expiration date of the effectiveness of the drug dispensed.
(10)The condition or purpose for which the drug was prescribed if the condition or purpose is indicated on the prescription.
(11)(A)Commencing January 1, 2006, the physical description of the dispensed medication, including its color, shape, and any identification code that appears on the tablets or capsules, except as follows:
(i)Prescriptions dispensed by a veterinarian.
(ii)An exemption from the requirements of this paragraph shall be granted to a new drug for the first 120 days that the drug is on the market and for the 90 days during which the national reference file has no description on file.
(iii)Dispensed medications for which no physical description exists in a commercially available database.
(B)This paragraph applies to outpatient pharmacies only.
(C)The information required by this paragraph may be printed on an auxiliary label that is affixed to the prescription container.
(D)This paragraph shall not become operative if the board, prior to January 1, 2006, adopts regulations that mandate the same labeling requirements set forth in this paragraph.
(b)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescribed drug by means of a unit dose medication system, as defined by administrative regulation, for a patient in a skilled nursing, intermediate care, or other health care facility, the requirements of this section will be satisfied if the unit dose medication system contains the aforementioned information or the information is otherwise readily available at the time of drug administration.
(c)If a pharmacist dispenses a dangerous drug or device in a facility licensed pursuant to Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, it is not necessary to include on individual unit dose containers for a specific patient, the name of the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6.
(d)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescription drug for use in a facility licensed pursuant to Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, it is not necessary to include the information required in paragraph (11) of subdivision (a) when the prescription drug is administered to a patient by a person licensed under the Medical Practice Act (Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000)), the Nursing Practice Act (Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 2700)), or the Vocational Nursing Practice Act (Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 2840)), who is acting within the scope of practice.
(e)A pharmacist shall use professional judgment to provide a patient with directions for use that enhance the patients understanding of those directions, consistent with the prescribers instructions.
(f)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other law, a pharmacist may dispense a drug prescribed pursuant to Section 120582 of the Health and Safety Code and label the drug without the name of an individual for whom the drug is intended if the prescription includes the words expedited partner therapy or the letters EPT.
(2)A pharmacist who prescribes, dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders EPT, as authorized in subdivision (f), shall not be liable in, and shall not be subject to, a civil, criminal, or administrative action, sanction, or penalty for rendering EPT, if the use of EPT is in compliance with this section, except in cases of intentional misconduct, gross negligence, or wanton or reckless activity.
(3)A pharmacist who provides EPT under this section shall provide written notification that describes the right of an individual who receives EPT to consult with a pharmacist about the medication dispensed and additional information regarding possible drug interactions.
(g)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other law, a pharmacist may, at their discretion, dispense brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the patient as required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), the name of the prescriber as required in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a), or the name and address of the pharmacy as required in paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) if the prescription is labeled with a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(2)A pharmacist who dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion, as authorized in paragraph (1), shall maintain a log with the prescription numbers and the information required in paragraphs (1) to (10), inclusive, of subdivision (a).
(3)Notwithstanding Section 4081, all records maintained under paragraph (2) shall not be open to inspection by law enforcement without a valid, court-issued subpoena.
(4)This subdivision does not prohibit the investigation of an activity that is punishable as a crime under the laws of this state, provided that records maintained under paragraph (2) are not shared with an individual or entity from another state.
(5)A pharmacist shall inform the patient that the pharmacist is dispensing brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion as authorized by this subdivision.
SEC. 8.5.Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:4076.(a)A pharmacist shall not dispense a prescription except in a container that meets the requirements of state and federal law and is correctly labeled with all of the following:
(1)Except when the prescriber or the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to Section 4052 or pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6 orders otherwise, either the manufacturers trade name of the drug or the generic name and the name of the manufacturer. Commonly used abbreviations may be used. Preparations containing two or more active ingredients may be identified by the manufacturers trade name or the commonly used name or the principal active ingredients.
(2)The directions for the use of the drug.
(3)The name of the patient or patients.
(4)The name of the prescriber or, if applicable, the name of the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to Section 4052 or pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6.
(5)The date of issue.
(6)The name and address of the pharmacy, and prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(7)The strength of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(8)The quantity of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(9)The expiration date of the effectiveness of the drug dispensed.
(10)The condition or purpose for which the drug was prescribed if the condition or purpose is indicated on the prescription.
(11)(A)Commencing January 1, 2006, the physical description of the dispensed medication, including its color, shape, and any identification code that appears on the tablets or capsules, except as follows:
(i)Prescriptions dispensed by a veterinarian.
(ii)An exemption from the requirements of this paragraph shall be granted to a new drug for the first 120 days that the drug is on the market and for the 90 days during which the national reference file has no description on file.
(iii)Dispensed medications for which no physical description exists in a commercially available database.
(B)This paragraph applies to outpatient pharmacies only.
(C)The information required by this paragraph may be printed on an auxiliary label that is affixed to the prescription container.
(D)This paragraph shall not become operative if the board, prior to January 1, 2006, adopts regulations that mandate the same labeling requirements set forth in this paragraph.
(b)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescribed drug by means of a unit dose medication system, as defined by administrative regulation, for a patient in a skilled nursing, intermediate care, or other health care facility, the requirements of this section will be satisfied if the unit dose medication system contains the aforementioned information or the information is otherwise readily available at the time of drug administration.
(c)If a pharmacist dispenses a dangerous drug or device in a facility licensed pursuant to Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, it is not necessary to include on individual unit dose containers for a specific patient, the name of the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to Section 4052 or pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6.
(d)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescription drug for use in a facility licensed pursuant to Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, it is not necessary to include the information required in paragraph (11) of subdivision (a) when the prescription drug is administered to a patient by a person licensed under the Medical Practice Act (Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000)), the Nursing Practice Act (Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 2700)), or the Vocational Nursing Practice Act (Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 2840)), who is acting within the scope of practice.
(e)A pharmacist shall use professional judgment to provide a patient with directions for use that enhance the patients understanding of those directions, consistent with the prescribers instructions.
(f)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other law, a pharmacist may dispense a drug prescribed pursuant to Section 120582 of the Health and Safety Code and label the drug without the name of an individual for whom the drug is intended if the prescription includes the words expedited partner therapy or the letters EPT.
(2)A pharmacist who prescribes, dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders EPT, as authorized in subdivision (f), shall not be liable in, and shall not be subject to, a civil, criminal, or administrative action, sanction, or penalty for rendering EPT, if the use of EPT is in compliance with this section, except in cases of intentional misconduct, gross negligence, or wanton or reckless activity.
(3)A pharmacist who provides EPT under this section shall provide written notification that describes the right of an individual who receives EPT to consult with a pharmacist about the medication dispensed and additional information regarding possible drug interactions.
(g)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other law, a pharmacist may, at their discretion, dispense brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the patient as required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), the name of the prescriber as required in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a), or the name and address of the pharmacy as required in paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) if the prescription is labeled with a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(2)A pharmacist who dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion, as authorized in paragraph (1), shall maintain a log with the prescription numbers and the information required in paragraphs (1) to (10), inclusive, of subdivision (a).
(3)Notwithstanding Section 4081, all records maintained under paragraph (2) shall not be open to inspection by law enforcement without a valid, court-issued subpoena.
(4)This subdivision does not prohibit the investigation of an activity that is punishable as a crime under the laws of this state, provided that records maintained under paragraph (2) are not shared with an individual or entity from another state.
(5)A pharmacist shall inform the patient that the pharmacist is dispensing brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion as authorized by this subdivision.
SEC. 9.Section 4318 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:4318.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)The board shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)The board shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
SEC. 10.Section 4521 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:4521.The board may suspend or revoke a license issued under this chapter for any of the following reasons:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:
(1)Incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out usual psychiatric technician functions.
(2)A conviction of practicing medicine without a license in violation of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000) of Division 2, the record of conviction being conclusive evidence thereof.
(3)The use of advertising relating to psychiatric technician services which violates Section 17500.
(4)Obtain or possess in violation of law, or prescribe, or, except as directed by a licensed physician and surgeon, dentist, or podiatrist, administer to the licensee or furnish or administer to another, any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code or any dangerous drug as defined in Section 4022.
(5)Use any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code, or any dangerous drug as defined in Section 4022, or alcoholic beverages, to an extent or in a manner dangerous or injurious to the licensee, any other person, or the public or to the extent that the use impairs the ability to conduct with safety to the public the practice authorized by their license.
(6)Be convicted of a criminal offense involving the falsification of records concerning prescription, possession, or consumption of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), in which event the record of the conviction is conclusive evidence of the conviction. The board may inquire into the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime in order to fix the degree of discipline.
(7)Be committed or confined by a court of competent jurisdiction for intemperate use of or addiction to the use of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), in which event the court order of commitment or confinement is prima facie evidence of the commitment or confinement.
(8)Falsify, or make grossly incorrect, grossly inconsistent, or unintelligible entries in any hospital, patient, or other record pertaining to the substances described in paragraph (4).
(b)Procuring a certificate or license by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
(c)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violation of, or conspiring to violate any provision or terms of this chapter.
(d)Giving any false statement or information in connection with an application.
(e)Conviction of any offense substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a psychiatric technician, in which event the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction. The board may inquire into the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime in order to fix the degree of discipline.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required by this chapter.
(g)Impersonating another practitioner, or permitting another person to use the licensees certificate or license.
(h)The use of excessive force upon or the mistreatment or abuse of any patient.
(i)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of or arranging for a violation of any of the provisions of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2220) of Chapter 5 of Division 2.
(j)Failure to maintain confidentiality of patient medical information, except as disclosure is otherwise permitted or required by law.
(k)Failure to report to the commission any act prohibited by this section.
(l)The commission of any act punishable as a sexually related crime, if that act is substantially related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(m)The commission of any act involving dishonesty, when that action is substantially related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(n)Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines, thereby risking transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from licensee to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensee. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, guidelines, and regulations pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the Medical Board of California, the Board of Dental Examiners, and the Board of Registered Nursing, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this section.
(o)The board shall seek to ensure that licentiates and others regulated by the board are informed of the responsibility of licentiates and others to follow infection control guidelines, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases.
SEC. 11.Section 56.110 of the Civil Code is amended to read:56.110.(a)Notwithstanding subdivision (c) of Section 56.10, a provider of health care, health care service plan, pharmaceutical company, contractor, or employer shall not knowingly disclose, transmit, transfer, share, or grant access to medical information in an electronic health records system or through a health information exchange that would identify an individual and that is related to an individual seeking, obtaining, providing, supporting, or aiding in the performance of an abortion that is lawful under the laws of this state to any individual or entity from another state, unless the disclosure, transmittal, transfer, sharing, or granting of access is authorized under any of the following conditions:
(1)In accordance with a valid, written authorization pursuant to Section 56.11 that clearly states that medical information on abortion or abortion-related services may be disclosed, and only to the extent and for the purposes expressly stated in the authorization.
(2)In accordance with paragraphs (2) and (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 56.10, to the extent necessary to allow responsibility for payment to be determined and payment to be made or to the extent that it is not further disclosed by the recipient in a way that would violate this part.
(3)In accordance with paragraphs (4) and (5) of subdivision (c) of Section 56.10 for the purpose of accreditation, in reviewing the competence or qualifications of health care professionals, or in reviewing health care services with respect to medical necessity, level of care, quality of care, or justification of charges.
(4)In accordance with paragraph (7) of subdivision (c) of Section 56.10, for the purpose of bona fide research. Institutional Review Boards shall consider the potential harm to the patient and the patients privacy when the research uses data that contains information related to abortion or abortion-related services and the research is performed out of state.
(b)Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the content of the health records containing medical information described in subdivision (a) shall be disclosed to any of the following:
(1)A patient, or their personal representative, consistent with the Patient Access to Health Records Act (Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 123100) of Part 1 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code).
(2)In response to an order of a California or federal court, but only to the extent clearly stated in the order and consistent with Section 1543 of the Penal Code, if applicable, and only if all information about the patients identity and records are protected from public scrutiny through mechanisms, including, but not limited to, a sealed proceeding or court record.
(3)When expressly required by federal law that preempts California law, but only to the extent expressly required.
(c)Nothing in this section shall prohibit a provider of health care, health care service plan, pharmaceutical company, contractor, or employer from cooperating or complying with the investigation of activity that is punishable as a crime under the laws of California, and that took place in California.
(d)A provider of health care, as defined in Section 56.05, shall not be subject to liability for damages or to civil or enforcement actions, including disciplinary actions, fines, or penalties, for failure to meet the requirements of this section before January 31, 2027, if the provider of health care is working diligently and in good faith to come into compliance with this section.
SEC. 12.Section 6925 of the Family Code is amended to read:6925.(a)A minor may consent to medical care related to the prevention or treatment of pregnancy.
(b)This section does not authorize a minor to be sterilized without the consent of the minors parent or guardian.
SEC. 13.Section 1220.2 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:1220.2.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensee concerning the transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)The department shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)The department shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
SEC. 14.Section 1265.12 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:1265.12.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensee concerning the transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)The department shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)The department shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
SEC. 15.Section 1367.21 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1367.21.(a)A health care service plan contract that covers prescription drug benefits shall not be issued, amended, delivered, or renewed in this state if the plan limits or excludes coverage for a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), provided that all of the following conditions have been met:
(1)The drug is approved by the FDA.
(2)(A)The drug is prescribed by a participating licensed health care professional for the treatment of a life-threatening condition; or
(B)The drug is prescribed by a participating licensed health care professional for the treatment of a chronic and seriously debilitating condition, the drug is medically necessary to treat that condition, and the drug is on the plan formulary. If the drug is not on the plan formulary, the participating subscribers request shall be considered pursuant to the process required by Section 1367.24.
(3)The drug has been recognized for treatment of that condition by any of the following:
(A)The American Hospital Formulary Services Drug Information.
(B)One of the following compendia, if recognized by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as part of an anticancer chemotherapeutic regimen:
(i)The Elsevier Gold Standards Clinical Pharmacology.
(ii)The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Drug and Biologics Compendium.
(iii)The Thomson Micromedex DrugDex.
(C)Two articles from major peer reviewed medical journals that present data supporting the proposed off-label use or uses as generally safe and effective unless there is clear and convincing contradictory evidence presented in a major peer reviewed medical journal.
(b)(1)A health care service plan contract that covers prescription drug benefits shall not be issued, amended, delivered, or renewed in this state if the contract limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to Section 355-1 of Title 21 of the United States Code, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(2)A health care service plan contract that covers prescription drug benefits shall include coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, even if the drug has not been approved by the FDA for abortion if the requirements of paragraph (3) have been met, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(3)If name brand or generic mifepristone has not been approved by the FDA for abortion, coverage is required pursuant to paragraph (2) if the drug is a recognized medication for abortion by the World Health Organization (WHO) Model List of Essential Medicines, the WHO abortion care guideline, or the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine Consensus Study Report, or if the state approves its use based on peer-reviewed studies and prior approval of the drug that is no longer in effect.
(c)It shall be the responsibility of the participating prescriber to submit to the plan documentation supporting compliance with the requirements of subdivision (a), if requested by the plan.
(d)Any coverage required by this section shall also include medically necessary services associated with the administration of a drug, subject to the conditions of the contract.
(e)For purposes of this section, life-threatening means either or both of the following:
(1)Diseases or conditions where the likelihood of death is high unless the course of the disease is interrupted.
(2)Diseases or conditions with potentially fatal outcomes, where the end point of clinical intervention is survival.
(f)For purposes of this section, chronic and seriously debilitating means diseases or conditions that require ongoing treatment to maintain remission or prevent deterioration and cause significant long-term morbidity.
(g)The provision of drugs and services when required by this section shall not, in itself, give rise to liability on the part of the plan.
(h)This section does not prohibit the use of a formulary, copayment, technology assessment panel, or similar mechanism as a means for appropriately controlling the utilization of a drug that is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA.
(i)If a plan denies coverage pursuant to this section on the basis that its use is experimental or investigational, that decision is subject to review under Section 1370.4.
(j)Health care service plan contracts for the delivery of Medi-Cal services under the Waxman-Duffy Prepaid Health Plan Act (Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200) of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code) are exempt from the requirements of this section.
SEC. 16.Section 1375.61 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1375.61.(a)A contract between a health care service plan and a provider of health care services shall not contain any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, based solely on either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another disciplinary action in another state, if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)A health care service plan shall not discriminate, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)This section does not apply to a civil judgment, a criminal conviction, or a disciplinary action imposed in another state based upon conduct that would subject a provider to claim, charge, or action under the laws of this state.
SEC. 17.Section 111376 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:111376.(a)The department may adopt regulations relating to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion by including brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion within, or excluding brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion from, the requirements of this article, whether or not the inclusion or exclusion of the drug is in accordance with federal law.
(b)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, this article shall not apply to brand name or generic mifepristone in the event of a labeling change or in the absence of its United States Food and Drug Administration approval if it is recommended for use by the World Health Organization and its labeling was true and accurate at the time of manufacture, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
SEC. 18.Section 111480 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:111480.(a)A drug or device sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device shall be exempt from the labeling requirements of Sections 111335, 111340, 111355, 111360, 111365, 111375, 111380, 111385, 111395, 111415, and 111420, if the drug or device bears a label displaying all of the following:
(1)Except when the prescriber orders otherwise, either the manufacturers trade name of the drug, or the generic name and the name of the manufacturer. Commonly used abbreviations may be used. Preparations containing two or more active ingredients may be identified by the manufacturers trade name or the commonly used name or the principal active ingredients.
(2)The directions for the use of the drug or device.
(3)The name of the patient(s).
(4)The name of the prescriber.
(5)The date of issue.
(6)The name, address of the furnisher, and prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(7)The strength of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(8)The quantity of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(9)The expiration date of the effectiveness of the drug or device if the information is included on the original label of the manufacturer of the drug or device.
(b)Brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device shall be exempt from the labeling requirements of Sections 111335, 111340, 111355, 111360, 111365, 111375, 111380, 111385, 111395, 111415, and 111420, if the label complies with subdivision (g) of Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code.
(c)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescribed drug by means of a unit dose medication system, as defined by administrative regulation, for a patient in a skilled nursing, intermediate care or other health care facility, the requirements of subdivision (a) shall be satisfied if the unit dose medication system contains the information required pursuant to subdivision (a) or the information is otherwise readily available at the time of drug administration.
(d)The exemption in subdivision (a) shall not apply to any drug or device dispensed in the course of the conduct of a business of dispensing drugs or devices pursuant to diagnosis by mail, or to a drug or device dispensed in violation of Section 111470.
SEC. 19.Section 10123.195 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10123.195.(a)A group or individual disability insurance policy issued, delivered, or renewed in this state or certificate of group disability insurance issued, delivered, or renewed in this state pursuant to a master group policy issued, delivered, or renewed in another state that, as a provision of hospital, medical, or surgical services, directly or indirectly covers prescription drugs shall not limit or exclude coverage for a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), provided that all of the following conditions have been met:
(1)The drug is approved by the FDA.
(2)(A)The drug is prescribed by a contracting licensed health care professional for the treatment of a life-threatening condition; or
(B)The drug is prescribed by a contracting licensed health care professional for the treatment of a chronic and seriously debilitating condition, the drug is medically necessary to treat that condition, and the drug is on the insurers formulary, if any.
(3)The drug has been recognized for treatment of that condition by any of the following:
(A)The American Hospital Formulary Services Drug Information.
(B)One of the following compendia, if recognized by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as part of an anticancer chemotherapeutic regimen:
(i)The Elsevier Gold Standards Clinical Pharmacology.
(ii)The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Drug and Biologics Compendium.
(iii)The Thomson Micromedex DrugDex.
(C)Two articles from major peer reviewed medical journals that present data supporting the proposed off-label use or uses as generally safe and effective unless there is clear and convincing contradictory evidence presented in a major peer reviewed medical journal.
(b)(1)A group or individual health insurance policy issued, delivered, or renewed in this state or certificate of group health insurance issued, delivered, or renewed in this state pursuant to a master group policy issued, delivered, or renewed in another state that, as a provision of hospital, medical, or surgical services, directly or indirectly covers prescription drugs shall not limit or exclude coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to Section 355-1 of Title 21 of the United States Code, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(2)A group or individual health insurance policy issued, delivered, or renewed in this state or certificate of group health insurance issued, delivered, or renewed in this state pursuant to a master group policy issued, delivered, or renewed in another state that, as a provision of hospital, medical, or surgical services, directly or indirectly covers prescription drugs shall include coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, even if the drug has not been approved by the FDA for abortion if the requirements of paragraph (3) have been met, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(3)If name brand or generic mifepristone has not been approved by the FDA for abortion, coverage is required pursuant to paragraph (2) if the drug is a recognized medication for abortion by the World Health Organization (WHO) Model List of Essential Medicines, the WHO abortion care guideline, or the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine Consensus Study Report, or if the state approves its use based on peer-reviewed studies and prior approval of the drug that is no longer in effect.
(c)It shall be the responsibility of the contracting prescriber to submit to the insurer documentation supporting compliance with the requirements of subdivision (a), if requested by the insurer.
(d)Any coverage required by this section shall also include medically necessary services associated with the administration of a drug subject to the conditions of the policy.
(e)For purposes of this section, life-threatening means either or both of the following:
(1)Diseases or conditions where the likelihood of death is high unless the course of the disease is interrupted.
(2)Diseases or conditions with potentially fatal outcomes, where the end point of clinical intervention is survival.
(f)For purposes of this section, chronic and seriously debilitating means diseases or conditions that require ongoing treatment to maintain remission or prevent deterioration and cause significant long-term morbidity.
(g)The provision of drugs and services when required by this section shall not, in itself, give rise to liability on the part of the insurer.
(h)This section shall not apply to a policy of disability insurance that covers hospital, medical, or surgical expenses that is issued outside of California to an employer whose principal place of business is located outside of California.
(i)This section does not prohibit the use of a formulary, copayment, technology assessment panel, or similar mechanism as a means for appropriately controlling the utilization of a drug that is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA.
(j)If an insurer denies coverage pursuant to this section on the basis that its use is experimental or investigational, that decision is subject to review under the Independent Medical Review System of Article 3.5 (commencing with Section 10169).
(k)This section is not applicable to vision-only, dental-only, Medicare or Champus supplement, disability income, long-term care, accident-only, specified disease or hospital confinement indemnity insurance.
SEC. 20.Section 10133.641 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10133.641.(a)A contract between a health insurer and a provider of health care services shall not contain any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, based solely on either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another professional disciplinary action in another state, if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)A health insurer shall not discriminate, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another professional disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)This section does not apply to a civil judgment, a criminal conviction, or a disciplinary action imposed in another state based upon conduct that would subject a provider to claim, charge, or action under the laws of this state.
(d)The commissioner may enforce this section pursuant to Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 11400) or Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 11500) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. This subdivision does not impair or restrict the commissioners enforcement authority pursuant to another provision of this code or the Administrative Procedure Act.
SEC. 21.Section 1108 of the Penal Code is repealed.SEC. 22.Section 3405 of the Penal Code is amended to read:3405.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by an incarcerated person, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Impermissible restrictions include, but are not limited to, imposing gestational limits inconsistent with state law, unreasonably delaying access to the procedure, or requiring court-ordered transport. Incarcerated persons found to be pregnant and desiring abortions, shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to state and federal law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion after giving informed consent.
(b)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all incarcerated persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 23.Section 4028 of the Penal Code is amended to read:4028.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by a person detained in any local detention facility, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Impermissible restrictions include, but are not limited to, imposing gestational limits inconsistent with state law, unreasonably delaying access to the procedure, or requiring court-ordered transportation. Persons found to be pregnant and desiring abortions shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to state and federal law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion, after providing informed consent.
(b)For the purposes of this section, local detention facility means any city, county, or regional facility used for the confinement for more than 24 hours of a person capable of becoming pregnant.
(c)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all incarcerated persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 24.Section 220 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:220.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by an individual detained in any local juvenile facility, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Individuals found to be pregnant and desiring abortions, shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion.
(b)For the purposes of this section, local juvenile facility means any city, county, or regional facility used for the confinement of juveniles for more than 24 hours.
(c)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all committed persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 25.Section 1773 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:1773.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by an individual committed to the Division of Juvenile Facilities, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Individuals found to be pregnant and desiring abortions shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion.
(b)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all committed persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 26.The provisions of this act are severable. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 27.Section 8.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by both this bill and Assembly Bill 1503. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2026, but this bill becomes operative first, (2) each bill amends Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Assembly Bill 1503, in which case Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code, as amended by Section 8 of this bill, shall remain operative only until the operative date of Assembly Bill 1503, at which time Section 8.5 of this bill shall become operative.
SEC. 28.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
SEC. 29.This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
To ensure continued access to medication abortion that has been proven safe and effective, it is necessary for this act to take effect immediately.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)It is the longstanding public policy of this state to promote access to reproductive health care, including abortion care, without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers. Every pregnant individual has the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, a right that is secured by the California Constitution.
(b)Recent federal action and litigation has raised uncertainty about the continued availability nationwide of mifepristone, a drug that has been clinically proven to be part of a safe and effective means of providing medication abortion.
(c)The continued attacks on reproductive freedom across the country require immediate action to protect the right to abortion access, including access to medication abortion, in California.
(d)The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the United States Supreme Court have long recognized states police powers and that direct control of medical practice in the states is beyond the power of federal government (Linder v. United States (1925) 268 U.S. 5, 18).
(e)It is the intent of the Legislature to ensure continued access to medication abortion that has been proven safe and effective for two decades in California for individuals seeking abortion care.
SEC. 2.Section 601 of the Business and Professions Code is repealed.SEC. 3.Section 687 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:687.(a)A healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs shall not be subject to a civil or criminal action or disciplinary or other administrative proceeding solely on the basis that the practitioner prescribed, furnished, ordered, or administered brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to Section 355-1 of Title 21 of the United States Code, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(b)Pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), the authority of a healing arts practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion is the practice of medicine, and the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the ability of a practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion if that action is lawful under the laws of the state, are against the public policy of this state.
SEC. 4.Section 850.3 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:850.3.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against an individual licensed or certified by a healing arts board concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)A healing arts board shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)A healing arts board shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee or health care practitioner subject to this division solely because the licensee or practitioner was convicted or disciplined in another state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
SEC. 5.Section 2519 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:2519.The board may suspend, revoke, or place on probation the license of a midwife for any of the following:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out the usual functions of a licensed midwife.
(2)Conviction of a violation of Section 2052, in which event, the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence thereof.
(3)The use of advertising that is fraudulent or misleading.
(4)Obtaining or possessing in violation of law, or prescribing, or except as directed by a licensed physician and surgeon, dentist, or podiatrist administering to themselves, or furnishing or administering to another, any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code or any dangerous drug as defined in Article 8 (commencing with Section 4210) of Chapter 9 of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code.
(5)The use of any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code, or any dangerous drug as defined in Article 8 (commencing with Section 4210) of Chapter 9 of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code, or alcoholic beverages, to an extent or in a manner dangerous or injurious to themselves, any other person, or the public, or to the extent that this use impairs their ability to conduct with safety to the public the practice authorized by their license.
(6)Conviction of a criminal offense involving the prescription, consumption, or self-administration of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), or the possession of, or falsification of, a record pertaining to, the substances described in paragraph (4), in which event the record of the conviction is conclusive evidence thereof.
(7)Commitment or confinement by a court of competent jurisdiction for intemperate use of or addiction to the use of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), in which event the court order of commitment or confinement is prima facie evidence of such commitment or confinement.
(8)Falsifying, or making grossly incorrect, grossly inconsistent, or unintelligible entries in any hospital, patient, or other record pertaining to the substances described in subdivision (a).
(b)Procuring a license by fraud or misrepresentation.
(c)Conviction of a crime substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a midwife, as determined by the board.
(d)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violation of, or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter.
(e)Making or giving any false statement or information in connection with the application for issuance of a license.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required under this chapter for the issuance of a license or a certificate.
(g)Impersonating another licensed practitioner, or permitting or allowing another person to use their license or certificate for the purpose of providing midwifery services.
(h)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of, or arranging for, a violation of any of the provisions of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2221) of Chapter 5.
(i) Failing to do any of the following when required pursuant to Section 2507:
(1)Consult with a physician and surgeon.
(2)Refer a client to a physician and surgeon.
(3)Transfer a client to a hospital.
SEC. 6.Section 2761 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:2761.The board may take disciplinary action against a certified or licensed nurse or deny an application for a certificate or license for any of the following:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(1)Incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out usual certified or licensed nursing functions.
(2)A conviction of practicing medicine without a license in violation of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000), in which event the record of conviction shall be conclusive evidence thereof.
(3)The use of advertising relating to nursing that violates Section 17500.
(4)Denial of licensure, revocation, suspension, restriction, or any other disciplinary action against a health care professional license or certificate by another state or territory of the United States, by any other government agency, or by another California health care professional licensing board. A certified copy of the decision or judgment shall be conclusive evidence of that action.
(b)Procuring their certificate or license by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
(c)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violating of, or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter or regulations adopted pursuant to it.
(d)Making or giving any false statement or information in connection with the application for issuance of a certificate or license.
(e)Conviction of a felony or of any offense substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a registered nurse, in which event the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence thereof.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required under this chapter for the issuance of a certificate or license.
(g)Impersonating another certified or licensed practitioner, or permitting or allowing another person to use their certificate or license for the purpose of nursing the sick or afflicted.
(h)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of, or arranging for, a violation of any of the provisions of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2220) of Chapter 5.
(i)Holding oneself out to the public or to any practitioner of the healing arts as a nurse practitioner or as meeting the standards established by the board for a nurse practitioner unless meeting the standards established by the board pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 2834) or holding oneself out to the public as being certified by the board as a nurse anesthetist, nurse midwife, clinical nurse specialist, or public health nurse unless the person is at the time certified by the board.
(j)(1)Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines of the board, thereby risking transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from licensed or certified nurse to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensed or certified nurse. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider referencing the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, guidelines, and regulations pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the Medical Board of California, the Podiatric Medical Board of California, the Dental Board of California, and the Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this subdivision.
(2)The board shall seek to ensure that licentiates and others regulated by the board are informed of the responsibility of licentiates to minimize the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from health care provider to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to health care provider, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risks of transmission.
SEC. 7.Section 2878 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:2878.The board may suspend or revoke a license issued under this chapter for any of the following:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:
(1)Incompetence, or gross negligence in carrying out usual nursing functions.
(2)A conviction of practicing medicine without a license in violation of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000), in which event the record of conviction shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction.
(3)The use of advertising relating to nursing which violates Section 17500.
(4)The use of excessive force upon or the mistreatment or abuse of any patient. For the purposes of this paragraph, excessive force means force clearly in excess of that which would normally be applied in similar clinical circumstances.
(5)The failure to maintain confidentiality of patient medical information, except as disclosure is otherwise permitted or required by law.
(6)Failure to report to the commission any act prohibited by this section.
(b)Procuring a certificate by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
(c)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violating of, or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter.
(d)Making or giving any false statement or information in connection with the application for issuance of a license.
(e)Conviction of a crime substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a licensed vocational nurse, in which event the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required under this chapter for the issuance of a license.
(g)Impersonating another practitioner, misrepresenting professional credentials or licensure status, or permitting another person to use the licensees certificate or license.
(h)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of or arranging for a violation of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2220) of Chapter 5.
(i)The commission of any act involving dishonesty, when that action is related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(j)The commission of any act punishable as a sexually related crime, if that act is substantially related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(k)Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines of the board, thereby risking transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from licensee to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensee. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider referencing the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, guidelines, and regulations pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the Medical Board of California, the Podiatric Medical Board of California, the Board of Dental Examiners, and the Board of Registered Nursing, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this subdivision.
(l)The board shall seek to ensure that licentiates and others regulated by the board are informed of the responsibility of licentiates and others to follow infection control guidelines, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases.
SEC. 8.Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:4076.(a)A pharmacist shall not dispense a prescription except in a container that meets the requirements of state and federal law and is correctly labeled with all of the following:
(1)Except when the prescriber or the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6 orders otherwise, either the manufacturers trade name of the drug or the generic name and the name of the manufacturer. Commonly used abbreviations may be used. Preparations containing two or more active ingredients may be identified by the manufacturers trade name or the commonly used name or the principal active ingredients.
(2)The directions for the use of the drug.
(3)The name of the patient or patients.
(4)The name of the prescriber or, if applicable, the name of the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6.
(5)The date of issue.
(6)The name and address of the pharmacy, and prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(7)The strength of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(8)The quantity of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(9)The expiration date of the effectiveness of the drug dispensed.
(10)The condition or purpose for which the drug was prescribed if the condition or purpose is indicated on the prescription.
(11)(A)Commencing January 1, 2006, the physical description of the dispensed medication, including its color, shape, and any identification code that appears on the tablets or capsules, except as follows:
(i)Prescriptions dispensed by a veterinarian.
(ii)An exemption from the requirements of this paragraph shall be granted to a new drug for the first 120 days that the drug is on the market and for the 90 days during which the national reference file has no description on file.
(iii)Dispensed medications for which no physical description exists in a commercially available database.
(B)This paragraph applies to outpatient pharmacies only.
(C)The information required by this paragraph may be printed on an auxiliary label that is affixed to the prescription container.
(D)This paragraph shall not become operative if the board, prior to January 1, 2006, adopts regulations that mandate the same labeling requirements set forth in this paragraph.
(b)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescribed drug by means of a unit dose medication system, as defined by administrative regulation, for a patient in a skilled nursing, intermediate care, or other health care facility, the requirements of this section will be satisfied if the unit dose medication system contains the aforementioned information or the information is otherwise readily available at the time of drug administration.
(c)If a pharmacist dispenses a dangerous drug or device in a facility licensed pursuant to Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, it is not necessary to include on individual unit dose containers for a specific patient, the name of the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6.
(d)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescription drug for use in a facility licensed pursuant to Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, it is not necessary to include the information required in paragraph (11) of subdivision (a) when the prescription drug is administered to a patient by a person licensed under the Medical Practice Act (Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000)), the Nursing Practice Act (Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 2700)), or the Vocational Nursing Practice Act (Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 2840)), who is acting within the scope of practice.
(e)A pharmacist shall use professional judgment to provide a patient with directions for use that enhance the patients understanding of those directions, consistent with the prescribers instructions.
(f)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other law, a pharmacist may dispense a drug prescribed pursuant to Section 120582 of the Health and Safety Code and label the drug without the name of an individual for whom the drug is intended if the prescription includes the words expedited partner therapy or the letters EPT.
(2)A pharmacist who prescribes, dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders EPT, as authorized in subdivision (f), shall not be liable in, and shall not be subject to, a civil, criminal, or administrative action, sanction, or penalty for rendering EPT, if the use of EPT is in compliance with this section, except in cases of intentional misconduct, gross negligence, or wanton or reckless activity.
(3)A pharmacist who provides EPT under this section shall provide written notification that describes the right of an individual who receives EPT to consult with a pharmacist about the medication dispensed and additional information regarding possible drug interactions.
(g)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other law, a pharmacist may, at their discretion, dispense brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the patient as required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), the name of the prescriber as required in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a), or the name and address of the pharmacy as required in paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) if the prescription is labeled with a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(2)A pharmacist who dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion, as authorized in paragraph (1), shall maintain a log with the prescription numbers and the information required in paragraphs (1) to (10), inclusive, of subdivision (a).
(3)Notwithstanding Section 4081, all records maintained under paragraph (2) shall not be open to inspection by law enforcement without a valid, court-issued subpoena.
(4)This subdivision does not prohibit the investigation of an activity that is punishable as a crime under the laws of this state, provided that records maintained under paragraph (2) are not shared with an individual or entity from another state.
(5)A pharmacist shall inform the patient that the pharmacist is dispensing brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion as authorized by this subdivision.
SEC. 8.5.Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:4076.(a)A pharmacist shall not dispense a prescription except in a container that meets the requirements of state and federal law and is correctly labeled with all of the following:
(1)Except when the prescriber or the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to Section 4052 or pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6 orders otherwise, either the manufacturers trade name of the drug or the generic name and the name of the manufacturer. Commonly used abbreviations may be used. Preparations containing two or more active ingredients may be identified by the manufacturers trade name or the commonly used name or the principal active ingredients.
(2)The directions for the use of the drug.
(3)The name of the patient or patients.
(4)The name of the prescriber or, if applicable, the name of the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to Section 4052 or pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6.
(5)The date of issue.
(6)The name and address of the pharmacy, and prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(7)The strength of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(8)The quantity of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(9)The expiration date of the effectiveness of the drug dispensed.
(10)The condition or purpose for which the drug was prescribed if the condition or purpose is indicated on the prescription.
(11)(A)Commencing January 1, 2006, the physical description of the dispensed medication, including its color, shape, and any identification code that appears on the tablets or capsules, except as follows:
(i)Prescriptions dispensed by a veterinarian.
(ii)An exemption from the requirements of this paragraph shall be granted to a new drug for the first 120 days that the drug is on the market and for the 90 days during which the national reference file has no description on file.
(iii)Dispensed medications for which no physical description exists in a commercially available database.
(B)This paragraph applies to outpatient pharmacies only.
(C)The information required by this paragraph may be printed on an auxiliary label that is affixed to the prescription container.
(D)This paragraph shall not become operative if the board, prior to January 1, 2006, adopts regulations that mandate the same labeling requirements set forth in this paragraph.
(b)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescribed drug by means of a unit dose medication system, as defined by administrative regulation, for a patient in a skilled nursing, intermediate care, or other health care facility, the requirements of this section will be satisfied if the unit dose medication system contains the aforementioned information or the information is otherwise readily available at the time of drug administration.
(c)If a pharmacist dispenses a dangerous drug or device in a facility licensed pursuant to Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, it is not necessary to include on individual unit dose containers for a specific patient, the name of the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to Section 4052 or pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6.
(d)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescription drug for use in a facility licensed pursuant to Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, it is not necessary to include the information required in paragraph (11) of subdivision (a) when the prescription drug is administered to a patient by a person licensed under the Medical Practice Act (Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000)), the Nursing Practice Act (Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 2700)), or the Vocational Nursing Practice Act (Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 2840)), who is acting within the scope of practice.
(e)A pharmacist shall use professional judgment to provide a patient with directions for use that enhance the patients understanding of those directions, consistent with the prescribers instructions.
(f)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other law, a pharmacist may dispense a drug prescribed pursuant to Section 120582 of the Health and Safety Code and label the drug without the name of an individual for whom the drug is intended if the prescription includes the words expedited partner therapy or the letters EPT.
(2)A pharmacist who prescribes, dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders EPT, as authorized in subdivision (f), shall not be liable in, and shall not be subject to, a civil, criminal, or administrative action, sanction, or penalty for rendering EPT, if the use of EPT is in compliance with this section, except in cases of intentional misconduct, gross negligence, or wanton or reckless activity.
(3)A pharmacist who provides EPT under this section shall provide written notification that describes the right of an individual who receives EPT to consult with a pharmacist about the medication dispensed and additional information regarding possible drug interactions.
(g)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other law, a pharmacist may, at their discretion, dispense brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the patient as required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), the name of the prescriber as required in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a), or the name and address of the pharmacy as required in paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) if the prescription is labeled with a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(2)A pharmacist who dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion, as authorized in paragraph (1), shall maintain a log with the prescription numbers and the information required in paragraphs (1) to (10), inclusive, of subdivision (a).
(3)Notwithstanding Section 4081, all records maintained under paragraph (2) shall not be open to inspection by law enforcement without a valid, court-issued subpoena.
(4)This subdivision does not prohibit the investigation of an activity that is punishable as a crime under the laws of this state, provided that records maintained under paragraph (2) are not shared with an individual or entity from another state.
(5)A pharmacist shall inform the patient that the pharmacist is dispensing brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion as authorized by this subdivision.
SEC. 9.Section 4318 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:4318.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)The board shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)The board shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
SEC. 10.Section 4521 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:4521.The board may suspend or revoke a license issued under this chapter for any of the following reasons:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:
(1)Incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out usual psychiatric technician functions.
(2)A conviction of practicing medicine without a license in violation of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000) of Division 2, the record of conviction being conclusive evidence thereof.
(3)The use of advertising relating to psychiatric technician services which violates Section 17500.
(4)Obtain or possess in violation of law, or prescribe, or, except as directed by a licensed physician and surgeon, dentist, or podiatrist, administer to the licensee or furnish or administer to another, any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code or any dangerous drug as defined in Section 4022.
(5)Use any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code, or any dangerous drug as defined in Section 4022, or alcoholic beverages, to an extent or in a manner dangerous or injurious to the licensee, any other person, or the public or to the extent that the use impairs the ability to conduct with safety to the public the practice authorized by their license.
(6)Be convicted of a criminal offense involving the falsification of records concerning prescription, possession, or consumption of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), in which event the record of the conviction is conclusive evidence of the conviction. The board may inquire into the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime in order to fix the degree of discipline.
(7)Be committed or confined by a court of competent jurisdiction for intemperate use of or addiction to the use of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), in which event the court order of commitment or confinement is prima facie evidence of the commitment or confinement.
(8)Falsify, or make grossly incorrect, grossly inconsistent, or unintelligible entries in any hospital, patient, or other record pertaining to the substances described in paragraph (4).
(b)Procuring a certificate or license by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
(c)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violation of, or conspiring to violate any provision or terms of this chapter.
(d)Giving any false statement or information in connection with an application.
(e)Conviction of any offense substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a psychiatric technician, in which event the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction. The board may inquire into the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime in order to fix the degree of discipline.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required by this chapter.
(g)Impersonating another practitioner, or permitting another person to use the licensees certificate or license.
(h)The use of excessive force upon or the mistreatment or abuse of any patient.
(i)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of or arranging for a violation of any of the provisions of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2220) of Chapter 5 of Division 2.
(j)Failure to maintain confidentiality of patient medical information, except as disclosure is otherwise permitted or required by law.
(k)Failure to report to the commission any act prohibited by this section.
(l)The commission of any act punishable as a sexually related crime, if that act is substantially related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(m)The commission of any act involving dishonesty, when that action is substantially related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(n)Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines, thereby risking transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from licensee to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensee. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, guidelines, and regulations pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the Medical Board of California, the Board of Dental Examiners, and the Board of Registered Nursing, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this section.
(o)The board shall seek to ensure that licentiates and others regulated by the board are informed of the responsibility of licentiates and others to follow infection control guidelines, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases.
SEC. 11.Section 56.110 of the Civil Code is amended to read:56.110.(a)Notwithstanding subdivision (c) of Section 56.10, a provider of health care, health care service plan, pharmaceutical company, contractor, or employer shall not knowingly disclose, transmit, transfer, share, or grant access to medical information in an electronic health records system or through a health information exchange that would identify an individual and that is related to an individual seeking, obtaining, providing, supporting, or aiding in the performance of an abortion that is lawful under the laws of this state to any individual or entity from another state, unless the disclosure, transmittal, transfer, sharing, or granting of access is authorized under any of the following conditions:
(1)In accordance with a valid, written authorization pursuant to Section 56.11 that clearly states that medical information on abortion or abortion-related services may be disclosed, and only to the extent and for the purposes expressly stated in the authorization.
(2)In accordance with paragraphs (2) and (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 56.10, to the extent necessary to allow responsibility for payment to be determined and payment to be made or to the extent that it is not further disclosed by the recipient in a way that would violate this part.
(3)In accordance with paragraphs (4) and (5) of subdivision (c) of Section 56.10 for the purpose of accreditation, in reviewing the competence or qualifications of health care professionals, or in reviewing health care services with respect to medical necessity, level of care, quality of care, or justification of charges.
(4)In accordance with paragraph (7) of subdivision (c) of Section 56.10, for the purpose of bona fide research. Institutional Review Boards shall consider the potential harm to the patient and the patients privacy when the research uses data that contains information related to abortion or abortion-related services and the research is performed out of state.
(b)Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the content of the health records containing medical information described in subdivision (a) shall be disclosed to any of the following:
(1)A patient, or their personal representative, consistent with the Patient Access to Health Records Act (Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 123100) of Part 1 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code).
(2)In response to an order of a California or federal court, but only to the extent clearly stated in the order and consistent with Section 1543 of the Penal Code, if applicable, and only if all information about the patients identity and records are protected from public scrutiny through mechanisms, including, but not limited to, a sealed proceeding or court record.
(3)When expressly required by federal law that preempts California law, but only to the extent expressly required.
(c)Nothing in this section shall prohibit a provider of health care, health care service plan, pharmaceutical company, contractor, or employer from cooperating or complying with the investigation of activity that is punishable as a crime under the laws of California, and that took place in California.
(d)A provider of health care, as defined in Section 56.05, shall not be subject to liability for damages or to civil or enforcement actions, including disciplinary actions, fines, or penalties, for failure to meet the requirements of this section before January 31, 2027, if the provider of health care is working diligently and in good faith to come into compliance with this section.
SEC. 12.Section 6925 of the Family Code is amended to read:6925.(a)A minor may consent to medical care related to the prevention or treatment of pregnancy.
(b)This section does not authorize a minor to be sterilized without the consent of the minors parent or guardian.
SEC. 13.Section 1220.2 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:1220.2.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensee concerning the transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)The department shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)The department shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
SEC. 14.Section 1265.12 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:1265.12.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensee concerning the transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)The department shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)The department shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
SEC. 15.Section 1367.21 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1367.21.(a)A health care service plan contract that covers prescription drug benefits shall not be issued, amended, delivered, or renewed in this state if the plan limits or excludes coverage for a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), provided that all of the following conditions have been met:
(1)The drug is approved by the FDA.
(2)(A)The drug is prescribed by a participating licensed health care professional for the treatment of a life-threatening condition; or
(B)The drug is prescribed by a participating licensed health care professional for the treatment of a chronic and seriously debilitating condition, the drug is medically necessary to treat that condition, and the drug is on the plan formulary. If the drug is not on the plan formulary, the participating subscribers request shall be considered pursuant to the process required by Section 1367.24.
(3)The drug has been recognized for treatment of that condition by any of the following:
(A)The American Hospital Formulary Services Drug Information.
(B)One of the following compendia, if recognized by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as part of an anticancer chemotherapeutic regimen:
(i)The Elsevier Gold Standards Clinical Pharmacology.
(ii)The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Drug and Biologics Compendium.
(iii)The Thomson Micromedex DrugDex.
(C)Two articles from major peer reviewed medical journals that present data supporting the proposed off-label use or uses as generally safe and effective unless there is clear and convincing contradictory evidence presented in a major peer reviewed medical journal.
(b)(1)A health care service plan contract that covers prescription drug benefits shall not be issued, amended, delivered, or renewed in this state if the contract limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to Section 355-1 of Title 21 of the United States Code, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(2)A health care service plan contract that covers prescription drug benefits shall include coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, even if the drug has not been approved by the FDA for abortion if the requirements of paragraph (3) have been met, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(3)If name brand or generic mifepristone has not been approved by the FDA for abortion, coverage is required pursuant to paragraph (2) if the drug is a recognized medication for abortion by the World Health Organization (WHO) Model List of Essential Medicines, the WHO abortion care guideline, or the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine Consensus Study Report, or if the state approves its use based on peer-reviewed studies and prior approval of the drug that is no longer in effect.
(c)It shall be the responsibility of the participating prescriber to submit to the plan documentation supporting compliance with the requirements of subdivision (a), if requested by the plan.
(d)Any coverage required by this section shall also include medically necessary services associated with the administration of a drug, subject to the conditions of the contract.
(e)For purposes of this section, life-threatening means either or both of the following:
(1)Diseases or conditions where the likelihood of death is high unless the course of the disease is interrupted.
(2)Diseases or conditions with potentially fatal outcomes, where the end point of clinical intervention is survival.
(f)For purposes of this section, chronic and seriously debilitating means diseases or conditions that require ongoing treatment to maintain remission or prevent deterioration and cause significant long-term morbidity.
(g)The provision of drugs and services when required by this section shall not, in itself, give rise to liability on the part of the plan.
(h)This section does not prohibit the use of a formulary, copayment, technology assessment panel, or similar mechanism as a means for appropriately controlling the utilization of a drug that is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA.
(i)If a plan denies coverage pursuant to this section on the basis that its use is experimental or investigational, that decision is subject to review under Section 1370.4.
(j)Health care service plan contracts for the delivery of Medi-Cal services under the Waxman-Duffy Prepaid Health Plan Act (Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200) of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code) are exempt from the requirements of this section.
SEC. 16.Section 1375.61 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1375.61.(a)A contract between a health care service plan and a provider of health care services shall not contain any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, based solely on either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another disciplinary action in another state, if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)A health care service plan shall not discriminate, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)This section does not apply to a civil judgment, a criminal conviction, or a disciplinary action imposed in another state based upon conduct that would subject a provider to claim, charge, or action under the laws of this state.
SEC. 17.Section 111376 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:111376.(a)The department may adopt regulations relating to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion by including brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion within, or excluding brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion from, the requirements of this article, whether or not the inclusion or exclusion of the drug is in accordance with federal law.
(b)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, this article shall not apply to brand name or generic mifepristone in the event of a labeling change or in the absence of its United States Food and Drug Administration approval if it is recommended for use by the World Health Organization and its labeling was true and accurate at the time of manufacture, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
SEC. 18.Section 111480 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:111480.(a)A drug or device sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device shall be exempt from the labeling requirements of Sections 111335, 111340, 111355, 111360, 111365, 111375, 111380, 111385, 111395, 111415, and 111420, if the drug or device bears a label displaying all of the following:
(1)Except when the prescriber orders otherwise, either the manufacturers trade name of the drug, or the generic name and the name of the manufacturer. Commonly used abbreviations may be used. Preparations containing two or more active ingredients may be identified by the manufacturers trade name or the commonly used name or the principal active ingredients.
(2)The directions for the use of the drug or device.
(3)The name of the patient(s).
(4)The name of the prescriber.
(5)The date of issue.
(6)The name, address of the furnisher, and prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(7)The strength of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(8)The quantity of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(9)The expiration date of the effectiveness of the drug or device if the information is included on the original label of the manufacturer of the drug or device.
(b)Brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device shall be exempt from the labeling requirements of Sections 111335, 111340, 111355, 111360, 111365, 111375, 111380, 111385, 111395, 111415, and 111420, if the label complies with subdivision (g) of Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code.
(c)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescribed drug by means of a unit dose medication system, as defined by administrative regulation, for a patient in a skilled nursing, intermediate care or other health care facility, the requirements of subdivision (a) shall be satisfied if the unit dose medication system contains the information required pursuant to subdivision (a) or the information is otherwise readily available at the time of drug administration.
(d)The exemption in subdivision (a) shall not apply to any drug or device dispensed in the course of the conduct of a business of dispensing drugs or devices pursuant to diagnosis by mail, or to a drug or device dispensed in violation of Section 111470.
SEC. 19.Section 10123.195 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10123.195.(a)A group or individual disability insurance policy issued, delivered, or renewed in this state or certificate of group disability insurance issued, delivered, or renewed in this state pursuant to a master group policy issued, delivered, or renewed in another state that, as a provision of hospital, medical, or surgical services, directly or indirectly covers prescription drugs shall not limit or exclude coverage for a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), provided that all of the following conditions have been met:
(1)The drug is approved by the FDA.
(2)(A)The drug is prescribed by a contracting licensed health care professional for the treatment of a life-threatening condition; or
(B)The drug is prescribed by a contracting licensed health care professional for the treatment of a chronic and seriously debilitating condition, the drug is medically necessary to treat that condition, and the drug is on the insurers formulary, if any.
(3)The drug has been recognized for treatment of that condition by any of the following:
(A)The American Hospital Formulary Services Drug Information.
(B)One of the following compendia, if recognized by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as part of an anticancer chemotherapeutic regimen:
(i)The Elsevier Gold Standards Clinical Pharmacology.
(ii)The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Drug and Biologics Compendium.
(iii)The Thomson Micromedex DrugDex.
(C)Two articles from major peer reviewed medical journals that present data supporting the proposed off-label use or uses as generally safe and effective unless there is clear and convincing contradictory evidence presented in a major peer reviewed medical journal.
(b)(1)A group or individual health insurance policy issued, delivered, or renewed in this state or certificate of group health insurance issued, delivered, or renewed in this state pursuant to a master group policy issued, delivered, or renewed in another state that, as a provision of hospital, medical, or surgical services, directly or indirectly covers prescription drugs shall not limit or exclude coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to Section 355-1 of Title 21 of the United States Code, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(2)A group or individual health insurance policy issued, delivered, or renewed in this state or certificate of group health insurance issued, delivered, or renewed in this state pursuant to a master group policy issued, delivered, or renewed in another state that, as a provision of hospital, medical, or surgical services, directly or indirectly covers prescription drugs shall include coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, even if the drug has not been approved by the FDA for abortion if the requirements of paragraph (3) have been met, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(3)If name brand or generic mifepristone has not been approved by the FDA for abortion, coverage is required pursuant to paragraph (2) if the drug is a recognized medication for abortion by the World Health Organization (WHO) Model List of Essential Medicines, the WHO abortion care guideline, or the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine Consensus Study Report, or if the state approves its use based on peer-reviewed studies and prior approval of the drug that is no longer in effect.
(c)It shall be the responsibility of the contracting prescriber to submit to the insurer documentation supporting compliance with the requirements of subdivision (a), if requested by the insurer.
(d)Any coverage required by this section shall also include medically necessary services associated with the administration of a drug subject to the conditions of the policy.
(e)For purposes of this section, life-threatening means either or both of the following:
(1)Diseases or conditions where the likelihood of death is high unless the course of the disease is interrupted.
(2)Diseases or conditions with potentially fatal outcomes, where the end point of clinical intervention is survival.
(f)For purposes of this section, chronic and seriously debilitating means diseases or conditions that require ongoing treatment to maintain remission or prevent deterioration and cause significant long-term morbidity.
(g)The provision of drugs and services when required by this section shall not, in itself, give rise to liability on the part of the insurer.
(h)This section shall not apply to a policy of disability insurance that covers hospital, medical, or surgical expenses that is issued outside of California to an employer whose principal place of business is located outside of California.
(i)This section does not prohibit the use of a formulary, copayment, technology assessment panel, or similar mechanism as a means for appropriately controlling the utilization of a drug that is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA.
(j)If an insurer denies coverage pursuant to this section on the basis that its use is experimental or investigational, that decision is subject to review under the Independent Medical Review System of Article 3.5 (commencing with Section 10169).
(k)This section is not applicable to vision-only, dental-only, Medicare or Champus supplement, disability income, long-term care, accident-only, specified disease or hospital confinement indemnity insurance.
SEC. 20.Section 10133.641 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10133.641.(a)A contract between a health insurer and a provider of health care services shall not contain any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, based solely on either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another professional disciplinary action in another state, if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)A health insurer shall not discriminate, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another professional disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)This section does not apply to a civil judgment, a criminal conviction, or a disciplinary action imposed in another state based upon conduct that would subject a provider to claim, charge, or action under the laws of this state.
(d)The commissioner may enforce this section pursuant to Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 11400) or Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 11500) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. This subdivision does not impair or restrict the commissioners enforcement authority pursuant to another provision of this code or the Administrative Procedure Act.
SEC. 21.Section 1108 of the Penal Code is repealed.SEC. 22.Section 3405 of the Penal Code is amended to read:3405.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by an incarcerated person, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Impermissible restrictions include, but are not limited to, imposing gestational limits inconsistent with state law, unreasonably delaying access to the procedure, or requiring court-ordered transport. Incarcerated persons found to be pregnant and desiring abortions, shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to state and federal law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion after giving informed consent.
(b)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all incarcerated persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 23.Section 4028 of the Penal Code is amended to read:4028.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by a person detained in any local detention facility, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Impermissible restrictions include, but are not limited to, imposing gestational limits inconsistent with state law, unreasonably delaying access to the procedure, or requiring court-ordered transportation. Persons found to be pregnant and desiring abortions shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to state and federal law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion, after providing informed consent.
(b)For the purposes of this section, local detention facility means any city, county, or regional facility used for the confinement for more than 24 hours of a person capable of becoming pregnant.
(c)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all incarcerated persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 24.Section 220 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:220.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by an individual detained in any local juvenile facility, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Individuals found to be pregnant and desiring abortions, shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion.
(b)For the purposes of this section, local juvenile facility means any city, county, or regional facility used for the confinement of juveniles for more than 24 hours.
(c)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all committed persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 25.Section 1773 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:1773.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by an individual committed to the Division of Juvenile Facilities, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Individuals found to be pregnant and desiring abortions shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion.
(b)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all committed persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 26.The provisions of this act are severable. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 27.Section 8.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by both this bill and Assembly Bill 1503. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2026, but this bill becomes operative first, (2) each bill amends Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Assembly Bill 1503, in which case Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code, as amended by Section 8 of this bill, shall remain operative only until the operative date of Assembly Bill 1503, at which time Section 8.5 of this bill shall become operative.
SEC. 28.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
SEC. 29.This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
To ensure continued access to medication abortion that has been proven safe and effective, it is necessary for this act to take effect immediately.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)It is the longstanding public policy of this state to promote access to reproductive health care, including abortion care, without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers. Every pregnant individual has the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, a right that is secured by the California Constitution.
(b)Recent federal action and litigation has raised uncertainty about the continued availability nationwide of mifepristone, a drug that has been clinically proven to be part of a safe and effective means of providing medication abortion.
(c)The continued attacks on reproductive freedom across the country require immediate action to protect the right to abortion access, including access to medication abortion, in California.
(d)The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the United States Supreme Court have long recognized states police powers and that direct control of medical practice in the states is beyond the power of federal government (Linder v. United States (1925) 268 U.S. 5, 18).
(e)It is the intent of the Legislature to ensure continued access to medication abortion that has been proven safe and effective for two decades in California for individuals seeking abortion care.
SEC. 2.Section 601 of the Business and Professions Code is repealed.SEC. 3.Section 687 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:687.(a)A healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs shall not be subject to a civil or criminal action or disciplinary or other administrative proceeding solely on the basis that the practitioner prescribed, furnished, ordered, or administered brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to Section 355-1 of Title 21 of the United States Code, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(b)Pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), the authority of a healing arts practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion is the practice of medicine, and the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the ability of a practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion if that action is lawful under the laws of the state, are against the public policy of this state.
SEC. 4.Section 850.3 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:850.3.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against an individual licensed or certified by a healing arts board concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)A healing arts board shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)A healing arts board shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee or health care practitioner subject to this division solely because the licensee or practitioner was convicted or disciplined in another state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
SEC. 5.Section 2519 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:2519.The board may suspend, revoke, or place on probation the license of a midwife for any of the following:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out the usual functions of a licensed midwife.
(2)Conviction of a violation of Section 2052, in which event, the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence thereof.
(3)The use of advertising that is fraudulent or misleading.
(4)Obtaining or possessing in violation of law, or prescribing, or except as directed by a licensed physician and surgeon, dentist, or podiatrist administering to themselves, or furnishing or administering to another, any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code or any dangerous drug as defined in Article 8 (commencing with Section 4210) of Chapter 9 of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code.
(5)The use of any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code, or any dangerous drug as defined in Article 8 (commencing with Section 4210) of Chapter 9 of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code, or alcoholic beverages, to an extent or in a manner dangerous or injurious to themselves, any other person, or the public, or to the extent that this use impairs their ability to conduct with safety to the public the practice authorized by their license.
(6)Conviction of a criminal offense involving the prescription, consumption, or self-administration of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), or the possession of, or falsification of, a record pertaining to, the substances described in paragraph (4), in which event the record of the conviction is conclusive evidence thereof.
(7)Commitment or confinement by a court of competent jurisdiction for intemperate use of or addiction to the use of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), in which event the court order of commitment or confinement is prima facie evidence of such commitment or confinement.
(8)Falsifying, or making grossly incorrect, grossly inconsistent, or unintelligible entries in any hospital, patient, or other record pertaining to the substances described in subdivision (a).
(b)Procuring a license by fraud or misrepresentation.
(c)Conviction of a crime substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a midwife, as determined by the board.
(d)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violation of, or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter.
(e)Making or giving any false statement or information in connection with the application for issuance of a license.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required under this chapter for the issuance of a license or a certificate.
(g)Impersonating another licensed practitioner, or permitting or allowing another person to use their license or certificate for the purpose of providing midwifery services.
(h)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of, or arranging for, a violation of any of the provisions of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2221) of Chapter 5.
(i) Failing to do any of the following when required pursuant to Section 2507:
(1)Consult with a physician and surgeon.
(2)Refer a client to a physician and surgeon.
(3)Transfer a client to a hospital.
SEC. 6.Section 2761 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:2761.The board may take disciplinary action against a certified or licensed nurse or deny an application for a certificate or license for any of the following:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(1)Incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out usual certified or licensed nursing functions.
(2)A conviction of practicing medicine without a license in violation of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000), in which event the record of conviction shall be conclusive evidence thereof.
(3)The use of advertising relating to nursing that violates Section 17500.
(4)Denial of licensure, revocation, suspension, restriction, or any other disciplinary action against a health care professional license or certificate by another state or territory of the United States, by any other government agency, or by another California health care professional licensing board. A certified copy of the decision or judgment shall be conclusive evidence of that action.
(b)Procuring their certificate or license by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
(c)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violating of, or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter or regulations adopted pursuant to it.
(d)Making or giving any false statement or information in connection with the application for issuance of a certificate or license.
(e)Conviction of a felony or of any offense substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a registered nurse, in which event the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence thereof.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required under this chapter for the issuance of a certificate or license.
(g)Impersonating another certified or licensed practitioner, or permitting or allowing another person to use their certificate or license for the purpose of nursing the sick or afflicted.
(h)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of, or arranging for, a violation of any of the provisions of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2220) of Chapter 5.
(i)Holding oneself out to the public or to any practitioner of the healing arts as a nurse practitioner or as meeting the standards established by the board for a nurse practitioner unless meeting the standards established by the board pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 2834) or holding oneself out to the public as being certified by the board as a nurse anesthetist, nurse midwife, clinical nurse specialist, or public health nurse unless the person is at the time certified by the board.
(j)(1)Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines of the board, thereby risking transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from licensed or certified nurse to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensed or certified nurse. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider referencing the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, guidelines, and regulations pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the Medical Board of California, the Podiatric Medical Board of California, the Dental Board of California, and the Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this subdivision.
(2)The board shall seek to ensure that licentiates and others regulated by the board are informed of the responsibility of licentiates to minimize the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from health care provider to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to health care provider, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risks of transmission.
SEC. 7.Section 2878 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:2878.The board may suspend or revoke a license issued under this chapter for any of the following:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:
(1)Incompetence, or gross negligence in carrying out usual nursing functions.
(2)A conviction of practicing medicine without a license in violation of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000), in which event the record of conviction shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction.
(3)The use of advertising relating to nursing which violates Section 17500.
(4)The use of excessive force upon or the mistreatment or abuse of any patient. For the purposes of this paragraph, excessive force means force clearly in excess of that which would normally be applied in similar clinical circumstances.
(5)The failure to maintain confidentiality of patient medical information, except as disclosure is otherwise permitted or required by law.
(6)Failure to report to the commission any act prohibited by this section.
(b)Procuring a certificate by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
(c)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violating of, or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter.
(d)Making or giving any false statement or information in connection with the application for issuance of a license.
(e)Conviction of a crime substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a licensed vocational nurse, in which event the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required under this chapter for the issuance of a license.
(g)Impersonating another practitioner, misrepresenting professional credentials or licensure status, or permitting another person to use the licensees certificate or license.
(h)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of or arranging for a violation of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2220) of Chapter 5.
(i)The commission of any act involving dishonesty, when that action is related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(j)The commission of any act punishable as a sexually related crime, if that act is substantially related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(k)Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines of the board, thereby risking transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from licensee to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensee. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider referencing the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, guidelines, and regulations pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the Medical Board of California, the Podiatric Medical Board of California, the Board of Dental Examiners, and the Board of Registered Nursing, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this subdivision.
(l)The board shall seek to ensure that licentiates and others regulated by the board are informed of the responsibility of licentiates and others to follow infection control guidelines, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases.
SEC. 8.Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:4076.(a)A pharmacist shall not dispense a prescription except in a container that meets the requirements of state and federal law and is correctly labeled with all of the following:
(1)Except when the prescriber or the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6 orders otherwise, either the manufacturers trade name of the drug or the generic name and the name of the manufacturer. Commonly used abbreviations may be used. Preparations containing two or more active ingredients may be identified by the manufacturers trade name or the commonly used name or the principal active ingredients.
(2)The directions for the use of the drug.
(3)The name of the patient or patients.
(4)The name of the prescriber or, if applicable, the name of the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6.
(5)The date of issue.
(6)The name and address of the pharmacy, and prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(7)The strength of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(8)The quantity of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(9)The expiration date of the effectiveness of the drug dispensed.
(10)The condition or purpose for which the drug was prescribed if the condition or purpose is indicated on the prescription.
(11)(A)Commencing January 1, 2006, the physical description of the dispensed medication, including its color, shape, and any identification code that appears on the tablets or capsules, except as follows:
(i)Prescriptions dispensed by a veterinarian.
(ii)An exemption from the requirements of this paragraph shall be granted to a new drug for the first 120 days that the drug is on the market and for the 90 days during which the national reference file has no description on file.
(iii)Dispensed medications for which no physical description exists in a commercially available database.
(B)This paragraph applies to outpatient pharmacies only.
(C)The information required by this paragraph may be printed on an auxiliary label that is affixed to the prescription container.
(D)This paragraph shall not become operative if the board, prior to January 1, 2006, adopts regulations that mandate the same labeling requirements set forth in this paragraph.
(b)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescribed drug by means of a unit dose medication system, as defined by administrative regulation, for a patient in a skilled nursing, intermediate care, or other health care facility, the requirements of this section will be satisfied if the unit dose medication system contains the aforementioned information or the information is otherwise readily available at the time of drug administration.
(c)If a pharmacist dispenses a dangerous drug or device in a facility licensed pursuant to Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, it is not necessary to include on individual unit dose containers for a specific patient, the name of the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6.
(d)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescription drug for use in a facility licensed pursuant to Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, it is not necessary to include the information required in paragraph (11) of subdivision (a) when the prescription drug is administered to a patient by a person licensed under the Medical Practice Act (Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000)), the Nursing Practice Act (Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 2700)), or the Vocational Nursing Practice Act (Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 2840)), who is acting within the scope of practice.
(e)A pharmacist shall use professional judgment to provide a patient with directions for use that enhance the patients understanding of those directions, consistent with the prescribers instructions.
(f)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other law, a pharmacist may dispense a drug prescribed pursuant to Section 120582 of the Health and Safety Code and label the drug without the name of an individual for whom the drug is intended if the prescription includes the words expedited partner therapy or the letters EPT.
(2)A pharmacist who prescribes, dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders EPT, as authorized in subdivision (f), shall not be liable in, and shall not be subject to, a civil, criminal, or administrative action, sanction, or penalty for rendering EPT, if the use of EPT is in compliance with this section, except in cases of intentional misconduct, gross negligence, or wanton or reckless activity.
(3)A pharmacist who provides EPT under this section shall provide written notification that describes the right of an individual who receives EPT to consult with a pharmacist about the medication dispensed and additional information regarding possible drug interactions.
(g)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other law, a pharmacist may, at their discretion, dispense brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the patient as required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), the name of the prescriber as required in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a), or the name and address of the pharmacy as required in paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) if the prescription is labeled with a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(2)A pharmacist who dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion, as authorized in paragraph (1), shall maintain a log with the prescription numbers and the information required in paragraphs (1) to (10), inclusive, of subdivision (a).
(3)Notwithstanding Section 4081, all records maintained under paragraph (2) shall not be open to inspection by law enforcement without a valid, court-issued subpoena.
(4)This subdivision does not prohibit the investigation of an activity that is punishable as a crime under the laws of this state, provided that records maintained under paragraph (2) are not shared with an individual or entity from another state.
(5)A pharmacist shall inform the patient that the pharmacist is dispensing brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion as authorized by this subdivision.
SEC. 8.5.Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:4076.(a)A pharmacist shall not dispense a prescription except in a container that meets the requirements of state and federal law and is correctly labeled with all of the following:
(1)Except when the prescriber or the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to Section 4052 or pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6 orders otherwise, either the manufacturers trade name of the drug or the generic name and the name of the manufacturer. Commonly used abbreviations may be used. Preparations containing two or more active ingredients may be identified by the manufacturers trade name or the commonly used name or the principal active ingredients.
(2)The directions for the use of the drug.
(3)The name of the patient or patients.
(4)The name of the prescriber or, if applicable, the name of the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to Section 4052 or pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6.
(5)The date of issue.
(6)The name and address of the pharmacy, and prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(7)The strength of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(8)The quantity of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(9)The expiration date of the effectiveness of the drug dispensed.
(10)The condition or purpose for which the drug was prescribed if the condition or purpose is indicated on the prescription.
(11)(A)Commencing January 1, 2006, the physical description of the dispensed medication, including its color, shape, and any identification code that appears on the tablets or capsules, except as follows:
(i)Prescriptions dispensed by a veterinarian.
(ii)An exemption from the requirements of this paragraph shall be granted to a new drug for the first 120 days that the drug is on the market and for the 90 days during which the national reference file has no description on file.
(iii)Dispensed medications for which no physical description exists in a commercially available database.
(B)This paragraph applies to outpatient pharmacies only.
(C)The information required by this paragraph may be printed on an auxiliary label that is affixed to the prescription container.
(D)This paragraph shall not become operative if the board, prior to January 1, 2006, adopts regulations that mandate the same labeling requirements set forth in this paragraph.
(b)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescribed drug by means of a unit dose medication system, as defined by administrative regulation, for a patient in a skilled nursing, intermediate care, or other health care facility, the requirements of this section will be satisfied if the unit dose medication system contains the aforementioned information or the information is otherwise readily available at the time of drug administration.
(c)If a pharmacist dispenses a dangerous drug or device in a facility licensed pursuant to Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, it is not necessary to include on individual unit dose containers for a specific patient, the name of the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to Section 4052 or pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6.
(d)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescription drug for use in a facility licensed pursuant to Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, it is not necessary to include the information required in paragraph (11) of subdivision (a) when the prescription drug is administered to a patient by a person licensed under the Medical Practice Act (Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000)), the Nursing Practice Act (Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 2700)), or the Vocational Nursing Practice Act (Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 2840)), who is acting within the scope of practice.
(e)A pharmacist shall use professional judgment to provide a patient with directions for use that enhance the patients understanding of those directions, consistent with the prescribers instructions.
(f)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other law, a pharmacist may dispense a drug prescribed pursuant to Section 120582 of the Health and Safety Code and label the drug without the name of an individual for whom the drug is intended if the prescription includes the words expedited partner therapy or the letters EPT.
(g)(2)A pharmacist who prescribes, dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders EPT, as authorized in subdivision (f), shall not be liable in, and shall not be subject to, a civil, criminal, or administrative action, sanction, or penalty for rendering EPT, if the use of EPT is in compliance with this section, except in cases of intentional misconduct, gross negligence, or wanton or reckless activity.
(h)(3)A pharmacist who provides EPT under this section shall provide written notification that describes the right of an individual who receives EPT to consult with a pharmacist about the medication dispensed and additional information regarding possible drug interactions.
(g)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other law, a pharmacist may, at their discretion, dispense brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the patient as required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), the name of the prescriber as required in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a), or the name and address of the pharmacy as required in paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) if the prescription is labeled with a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(2)A pharmacist who dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion, as authorized in paragraph (1), shall maintain a log with the prescription numbers and the information required in paragraphs (1) to (10), inclusive, of subdivision (a).
(3)Notwithstanding Section 4081, all records maintained under paragraph (2) shall not be open to inspection by law enforcement without a valid, court-issued subpoena.
(4)This subdivision does not prohibit the investigation of an activity that is punishable as a crime under the laws of this state, provided that records maintained under paragraph (2) are not shared with an individual or entity from another state.
(5)A pharmacist shall inform the patient that the pharmacist is dispensing brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion as authorized by this subdivision.
SEC. 9.Section 4318 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:4318.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)The board shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)The board shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
SEC. 10.Section 4521 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:4521.The board may suspend or revoke a license issued under this chapter for any of the following reasons:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:
(1)Incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out usual psychiatric technician functions.
(2)A conviction of practicing medicine without a license in violation of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000) of Division 2, the record of conviction being conclusive evidence thereof.
(3)The use of advertising relating to psychiatric technician services which violates Section 17500.
(4)Obtain or possess in violation of law, or prescribe, or, except as directed by a licensed physician and surgeon, dentist, or podiatrist, administer to the licensee or furnish or administer to another, any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code or any dangerous drug as defined in Section 4022.
(5)Use any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code, or any dangerous drug as defined in Section 4022, or alcoholic beverages, to an extent or in a manner dangerous or injurious to the licensee, any other person, or the public or to the extent that the use impairs the ability to conduct with safety to the public the practice authorized by their license.
(6)Be convicted of a criminal offense involving the falsification of records concerning prescription, possession, or consumption of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), in which event the record of the conviction is conclusive evidence of the conviction. The board may inquire into the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime in order to fix the degree of discipline.
(7)Be committed or confined by a court of competent jurisdiction for intemperate use of or addiction to the use of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), in which event the court order of commitment or confinement is prima facie evidence of the commitment or confinement.
(8)Falsify, or make grossly incorrect, grossly inconsistent, or unintelligible entries in any hospital, patient, or other record pertaining to the substances described in paragraph (4).
(b)Procuring a certificate or license by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
(c)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violation of, or conspiring to violate any provision or terms of this chapter.
(d)Giving any false statement or information in connection with an application.
(e)Conviction of any offense substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a psychiatric technician, in which event the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction. The board may inquire into the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime in order to fix the degree of discipline.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required by this chapter.
(g)Impersonating another practitioner, or permitting another person to use the licensees certificate or license.
(h)The use of excessive force upon or the mistreatment or abuse of any patient.
(i)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of or arranging for a violation of any of the provisions of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2220) of Chapter 5 of Division 2.
(j)Failure to maintain confidentiality of patient medical information, except as disclosure is otherwise permitted or required by law.
(k)Failure to report to the commission any act prohibited by this section.
(l)The commission of any act punishable as a sexually related crime, if that act is substantially related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(m)The commission of any act involving dishonesty, when that action is substantially related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(n)Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines, thereby risking transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from licensee to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensee. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, guidelines, and regulations pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the Medical Board of California, the Board of Dental Examiners, and the Board of Registered Nursing, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this section.
(o)The board shall seek to ensure that licentiates and others regulated by the board are informed of the responsibility of licentiates and others to follow infection control guidelines, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases.
SEC. 11.Section 56.110 of the Civil Code is amended to read:56.110.(a)Notwithstanding subdivision (c) of Section 56.10, a provider of health care, health care service plan, pharmaceutical company, contractor, or employer shall not knowingly disclose, transmit, transfer, share, or grant access to medical information in an electronic health records system or through a health information exchange that would identify an individual and that is related to an individual seeking, obtaining, providing, supporting, or aiding in the performance of an abortion that is lawful under the laws of this state to any individual or entity from another state, unless the disclosure, transmittal, transfer, sharing, or granting of access is authorized under any of the following conditions:
(1)In accordance with a valid, written authorization pursuant to Section 56.11 that clearly states that medical information on abortion or abortion-related services may be disclosed, and only to the extent and for the purposes expressly stated in the authorization.
(2)In accordance with paragraphs (2) and (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 56.10, to the extent necessary to allow responsibility for payment to be determined and payment to be made or to the extent that it is not further disclosed by the recipient in a way that would violate this part.
(3)In accordance with paragraphs (4) and (5) of subdivision (c) of Section 56.10 for the purpose of accreditation, in reviewing the competence or qualifications of health care professionals, or in reviewing health care services with respect to medical necessity, level of care, quality of care, or justification of charges.
(4)In accordance with paragraph (7) of subdivision (c) of Section 56.10, for the purpose of bona fide research. Institutional Review Boards shall consider the potential harm to the patient and the patients privacy when the research uses data that contains information related to abortion or abortion-related services and the research is performed out of state.
(b)Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the content of the health records containing medical information described in subdivision (a) shall be disclosed to any of the following:
(1)A patient, or their personal representative, consistent with the Patient Access to Health Records Act (Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 123100) of Part 1 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code).
(2)In response to an order of a California or federal court, but only to the extent clearly stated in the order and consistent with Section 1543 of the Penal Code, if applicable, and only if all information about the patients identity and records are protected from public scrutiny through mechanisms, including, but not limited to, a sealed proceeding or court record.
(3)When expressly required by federal law that preempts California law, but only to the extent expressly required.
(c)Nothing in this section shall prohibit a provider of health care, health care service plan, pharmaceutical company, contractor, or employer from cooperating or complying with the investigation of activity that is punishable as a crime under the laws of California, and that took place in California.
(d)A provider of health care, as defined in Section 56.05, shall not be subject to liability for damages or to civil or enforcement actions, including disciplinary actions, fines, or penalties, for failure to meet the requirements of this section before January 31, 2026, 2027, if the provider of health care is working diligently and in good faith to come into compliance with this section.
SEC. 11.SEC. 12.Section 6925 of the Family Code is amended to read:6925.(a)A minor may consent to medical care related to the prevention or treatment of pregnancy.
(b)This section does not authorize a minor to be sterilized without the consent of the minors parent or guardian.
SEC. 12.SEC. 13.Section 1220.2 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:1220.2.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensee concerning the transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)The department shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)The department shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
SEC. 13.SEC. 14.Section 1265.12 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:1265.12.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensee concerning the transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)The department shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)The department shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
SEC. 14.SEC. 15.Section 1367.21 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1367.21.(a)A health care service plan contract that covers prescription drug benefits shall not be issued, amended, delivered, or renewed in this state if the plan limits or excludes coverage for a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), provided that all of the following conditions have been met:
(1)The drug is approved by the FDA.
(2)(A)The drug is prescribed by a participating licensed health care professional for the treatment of a life-threatening condition; or
(B)The drug is prescribed by a participating licensed health care professional for the treatment of a chronic and seriously debilitating condition, the drug is medically necessary to treat that condition, and the drug is on the plan formulary. If the drug is not on the plan formulary, the participating subscribers request shall be considered pursuant to the process required by Section 1367.24.
(3)The drug has been recognized for treatment of that condition by any of the following:
(A)The American Hospital Formulary Services Drug Information.
(B)One of the following compendia, if recognized by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as part of an anticancer chemotherapeutic regimen:
(i)The Elsevier Gold Standards Clinical Pharmacology.
(ii)The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Drug and Biologics Compendium.
(iii)The Thomson Micromedex DrugDex.
(C)Two articles from major peer reviewed medical journals that present data supporting the proposed off-label use or uses as generally safe and effective unless there is clear and convincing contradictory evidence presented in a major peer reviewed medical journal.
(b)(1)A health care service plan contract that covers prescription drug benefits shall not be issued, amended, delivered, or renewed in this state if the contract limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to Section 355-1 of Title 21 of the United States Code, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(2)A health care service plan contract that covers prescription drug benefits shall include coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, even if the drug has not been approved by the FDA for abortion if the requirements of paragraph (3) have been met, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(3)If name brand or generic mifepristone has not been approved by the FDA for abortion, coverage is required pursuant to paragraph (2) if the drug is a recognized medication for abortion by the World Health Organization (WHO) Model List of Essential Medicines, the WHO abortion care guideline, or the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine Consensus Study Report, or if the state approves its use based on peer-reviewed studies and prior approval of the drug that is no longer in effect.
(c)It shall be the responsibility of the participating prescriber to submit to the plan documentation supporting compliance with the requirements of subdivision (a), if requested by the plan.
(d)Any coverage required by this section shall also include medically necessary services associated with the administration of a drug, subject to the conditions of the contract.
(e)For purposes of this section, life-threatening means either or both of the following:
(1)Diseases or conditions where the likelihood of death is high unless the course of the disease is interrupted.
(2)Diseases or conditions with potentially fatal outcomes, where the end point of clinical intervention is survival.
(f)For purposes of this section, chronic and seriously debilitating means diseases or conditions that require ongoing treatment to maintain remission or prevent deterioration and cause significant long-term morbidity.
(g)The provision of drugs and services when required by this section shall not, in itself, give rise to liability on the part of the plan.
(h)This section does not prohibit the use of a formulary, copayment, technology assessment panel, or similar mechanism as a means for appropriately controlling the utilization of a drug that is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA.
(i)If a plan denies coverage pursuant to this section on the basis that its use is experimental or investigational, that decision is subject to review under Section 1370.4.
(j)Health care service plan contracts for the delivery of Medi-Cal services under the Waxman-Duffy Prepaid Health Plan Act (Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200) of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code) are exempt from the requirements of this section.
SEC. 15.SEC. 16.Section 1375.61 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1375.61.(a)A contract between a health care service plan and a provider of health care services shall not contain any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, based solely on either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another disciplinary action in another state, if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)A health care service plan shall not discriminate, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)This section does not apply to a civil judgment, a criminal conviction, or a disciplinary action imposed in another state based upon conduct that would subject a provider to claim, charge, or action under the laws of this state.
SEC. 16.SEC. 17.Section 111376 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:111376.(a)The department may adopt regulations relating to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion by including brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion within, or excluding brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion from, the requirements of this article, whether or not the inclusion or exclusion of the drug is in accordance with federal law.
(b)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, this article shall not apply to brand name or generic mifepristone in the event of a labeling change or in the absence of its United States Food and Drug Administration approval if it is recommended for use by the World Health Organization and its labeling was true and accurate at the time of manufacture, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
SEC. 17.SEC. 18.Section 111480 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:111480.(a)A drug or device sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device shall be exempt from the labeling requirements of Sections 111335, 111340, 111355, 111360, 111365, 111375, 111380, 111385, 111395, 111415, and 111420, if the drug or device bears a label displaying all of the following:
(1)Except when the prescriber orders otherwise, either the manufacturers trade name of the drug, or the generic name and the name of the manufacturer. Commonly used abbreviations may be used. Preparations containing two or more active ingredients may be identified by the manufacturers trade name or the commonly used name or the principal active ingredients.
(2)The directions for the use of the drug or device.
(3)The name of the patient(s).
(4)The name of the prescriber.
(5)The date of issue.
(6)The name, address of the furnisher, and prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(7)The strength of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(8)The quantity of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(9)The expiration date of the effectiveness of the drug or device if the information is included on the original label of the manufacturer of the drug or device.
(b)Brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device shall be exempt from the labeling requirements of Sections 111335, 111340, 111355, 111360, 111365, 111375, 111380, 111385, 111395, 111415, and 111420, if the label complies with subdivision (g) of Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code.
(c)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescribed drug by means of a unit dose medication system, as defined by administrative regulation, for a patient in a skilled nursing, intermediate care or other health care facility, the requirements of subdivision (a) shall be satisfied if the unit dose medication system contains the information required pursuant to subdivision (a) or the information is otherwise readily available at the time of drug administration.
(d)The exemption in subdivision (a) shall not apply to any drug or device dispensed in the course of the conduct of a business of dispensing drugs or devices pursuant to diagnosis by mail, or to a drug or device dispensed in violation of Section 111470.
SEC. 18.SEC. 19.Section 10123.195 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10123.195.(a)A group or individual disability insurance policy issued, delivered, or renewed in this state or certificate of group disability insurance issued, delivered, or renewed in this state pursuant to a master group policy issued, delivered, or renewed in another state that, as a provision of hospital, medical, or surgical services, directly or indirectly covers prescription drugs shall not limit or exclude coverage for a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), provided that all of the following conditions have been met:
(1)The drug is approved by the FDA.
(2)(A)The drug is prescribed by a contracting licensed health care professional for the treatment of a life-threatening condition; or
(B)The drug is prescribed by a contracting licensed health care professional for the treatment of a chronic and seriously debilitating condition, the drug is medically necessary to treat that condition, and the drug is on the insurers formulary, if any.
(3)The drug has been recognized for treatment of that condition by any of the following:
(A)The American Hospital Formulary Services Drug Information.
(B)One of the following compendia, if recognized by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as part of an anticancer chemotherapeutic regimen:
(i)The Elsevier Gold Standards Clinical Pharmacology.
(ii)The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Drug and Biologics Compendium.
(iii)The Thomson Micromedex DrugDex.
(C)Two articles from major peer reviewed medical journals that present data supporting the proposed off-label use or uses as generally safe and effective unless there is clear and convincing contradictory evidence presented in a major peer reviewed medical journal.
(b)(1)A group or individual health insurance policy issued, delivered, or renewed in this state or certificate of group health insurance issued, delivered, or renewed in this state pursuant to a master group policy issued, delivered, or renewed in another state that, as a provision of hospital, medical, or surgical services, directly or indirectly covers prescription drugs shall not limit or exclude coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to Section 355-1 of Title 21 of the United States Code, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(2)A group or individual health insurance policy issued, delivered, or renewed in this state or certificate of group health insurance issued, delivered, or renewed in this state pursuant to a master group policy issued, delivered, or renewed in another state that, as a provision of hospital, medical, or surgical services, directly or indirectly covers prescription drugs shall include coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, even if the drug has not been approved by the FDA for abortion if the requirements of paragraph (3) have been met, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(3)If name brand or generic mifepristone has not been approved by the FDA for abortion, coverage is required pursuant to paragraph (2) if the drug is a recognized medication for abortion by the World Health Organization (WHO) Model List of Essential Medicines, the WHO abortion care guideline, or the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine Consensus Study Report, or if the state approves its use based on peer-reviewed studies and prior approval of the drug that is no longer in effect.
(c)It shall be the responsibility of the contracting prescriber to submit to the insurer documentation supporting compliance with the requirements of subdivision (a), if requested by the insurer.
(d)Any coverage required by this section shall also include medically necessary services associated with the administration of a drug subject to the conditions of the policy.
(e)For purposes of this section, life-threatening means either or both of the following:
(1)Diseases or conditions where the likelihood of death is high unless the course of the disease is interrupted.
(2)Diseases or conditions with potentially fatal outcomes, where the end point of clinical intervention is survival.
(f)For purposes of this section, chronic and seriously debilitating means diseases or conditions that require ongoing treatment to maintain remission or prevent deterioration and cause significant long-term morbidity.
(g)The provision of drugs and services when required by this section shall not, in itself, give rise to liability on the part of the insurer.
(h)This section shall not apply to a policy of disability insurance that covers hospital, medical, or surgical expenses that is issued outside of California to an employer whose principal place of business is located outside of California.
(i)This section does not prohibit the use of a formulary, copayment, technology assessment panel, or similar mechanism as a means for appropriately controlling the utilization of a drug that is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA.
(j)If an insurer denies coverage pursuant to this section on the basis that its use is experimental or investigational, that decision is subject to review under the Independent Medical Review System of Article 3.5 (commencing with Section 10169).
(k)This section is not applicable to vision-only, dental-only, Medicare or Champus supplement, disability income, long-term care, accident-only, specified disease or hospital confinement indemnity insurance.
SEC. 19.SEC. 20.Section 10133.641 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10133.641.(a)A contract between a health insurer and a provider of health care services shall not contain any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, based solely on either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another professional disciplinary action in another state, if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)A health insurer shall not discriminate, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another professional disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)This section does not apply to a civil judgment, a criminal conviction, or a disciplinary action imposed in another state based upon conduct that would subject a provider to claim, charge, or action under the laws of this state.
(d)The commissioner may enforce this section pursuant to Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 11400) or Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 11500) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. This subdivision does not impair or restrict the commissioners enforcement authority pursuant to another provision of this code or the Administrative Procedure Act.
SEC. 20.SEC. 21.Section 1108 of the Penal Code is repealed.SEC. 21.SEC. 22.Section 3405 of the Penal Code is amended to read:3405.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by an incarcerated person, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Impermissible restrictions include, but are not limited to, imposing gestational limits inconsistent with state law, unreasonably delaying access to the procedure, or requiring court-ordered transport. Incarcerated persons found to be pregnant and desiring abortions, shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to state and federal law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion after giving informed consent.
(b)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all incarcerated persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 22.SEC. 23.Section 4028 of the Penal Code is amended to read:4028.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by a person detained in any local detention facility, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Impermissible restrictions include, but are not limited to, imposing gestational limits inconsistent with state law, unreasonably delaying access to the procedure, or requiring court-ordered transportation. Persons found to be pregnant and desiring abortions shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to state and federal law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion, after providing informed consent.
(b)For the purposes of this section, local detention facility means any city, county, or regional facility used for the confinement for more than 24 hours of a person capable of becoming pregnant.
(c)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all incarcerated persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 23.SEC. 24.Section 220 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:220.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by an individual detained in any local juvenile facility, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Individuals found to be pregnant and desiring abortions, shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion.
(b)For the purposes of this section, local juvenile facility means any city, county, or regional facility used for the confinement of juveniles for more than 24 hours.
(c)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all committed persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 24.SEC. 25.Section 1773 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:1773.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by an individual committed to the Division of Juvenile Facilities, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Individuals found to be pregnant and desiring abortions shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion.
(b)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all committed persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 25.Section 14043.8 is added to the Welfare and Institutions Code, to read:14043.8.(a)The department shall update the Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirement and procedures for remote service providers who offer reproductive health care services primarily through telehealth modalities seeking enrollment in the Medi-Cal program to report an administrative location as their service address. That administrative location shall be exempt from the following established place of business requirements listed in Section 51000.60(c) of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations:(1)Displays regular and permanently posted business hours.(2)Is identifiable as a medical or health care provider or business by permanently attached signage that identifies the name of the provider or business as shown on the application.(3)Obtains and maintains liability insurance coverage, which covers premises and operation, in an amount not less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) per claim with a minimum annual aggregate of not less than three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) from an authorized insurer, pursuant to Section 700 of the Insurance Code.(b)The department shall modify the requirement set forth in Section 51000.4 of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations to permit the use of a cellular telephone as the primary business phone for reproductive health care providers.(c)A provider subject to this section shall meet current Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirements and standards.(d)For purposes of this section, reproductive health care services has the same meaning as defined in Section 1798.300 of the Civil Code when those services meet the applicable standard of care and may be appropriately delivered via the telehealth modalities.SEC. 26.Section 14132.725 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:14132.725.(a)For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:(1)Asynchronous store and forward has the same meaning as set forth in subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code. Transmission under asynchronous store and forward also includes asynchronous electronic transmission initiated directly by patients, including through mobile telephone applications.(2)Border community means border areas adjacent to the State of California where it is customary practice for California residents to use medical resources in adjacent areas outside the state. Under these circumstances, program controls and limitations are the same as for services rendered by health care providers within the state.(3)Health care provider has the same meaning as set forth in paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code, and shall be either enrolled as a Medi-Cal rendering provider, or a nonphysician medical practitioner affiliated with an enrolled Medi-Cal provider group. Health care provider also includes any provider type designated by the department pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b). The enrolled Medi-Cal provider or provider group for which the health care provider renders services via telehealth shall meet all Medi-Cal requirements and shall be located in the state or a border community.(4)Health care service plan has the same meaning as set forth in subdivision (f) of Section 1345 of the Health and Safety Code.(5)Medi-Cal managed care plan has the same meaning as set forth in subdivision (j) of Section 14184.101.(6)Network provider has the same meaning as set forth in Section 438.2 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.(7)Telehealth has the same meaning as set forth in paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code.(b)(1)Subject to subdivision (k), in-person, face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient is not required under the Medi-Cal program for covered health care services and provider types designated by the department, when provided by video synchronous interaction, asynchronous store and forward, audio-only synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other permissible virtual communication modalities, when those services and settings meet the applicable standard of care and meet the requirements of the service code being billed.(2)(A)In implementing this section, the department shall designate and periodically update the covered health care services and provider types, including required licensing and credentialing criteria, as applicable, which may be appropriately delivered via the telehealth modalities described in this subdivision.(B)Applicable health care services appropriately provided through video synchronous interaction, asynchronous store and forward, audio-only synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other permissible virtual communication modalities are subject to billing, reimbursement, and utilization management policies imposed by the department. Subject to subdivision (k), utilization management protocols adopted by the department pursuant to this section shall be consistent with, and no more restrictive than, those authorized for health care service plans pursuant to Section 1374.13 of the Health and Safety Code.(c)(1)(A)Pursuant to an effective date designated by the department that is no sooner than January 1, 2024, a Medi-Cal provider furnishing applicable health care services via audio-only synchronous interaction shall also offer those same health care services via video synchronous interaction to preserve beneficiary choice.(B)(i)The department may provide specific exceptions to the requirement specified in subparagraph (A), based on a Medi-Cal providers access to requisite technologies, which shall be developed in consultation with affected stakeholders and published in departmental guidance.(ii)In making exceptions to the requirement specified in subparagraph (A), in addition to the provisions in clause (i), the department may also take into consideration the availability of broadband access based on speed standards set by the Federal Communications Commission, pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-104) or other applicable federal law or regulation.(2)Effective on the date designated by the department pursuant to paragraph (1), a provider furnishing services through video synchronous interaction or audio-only synchronous interaction shall also maintain and follow protocols to do one of the following:(A)Offer those services via in-person, face-to-face contact.(B)(i)Arrange for a referral to, and a facilitation of, in-person care that does not require a patient to independently contact a different provider to arrange for that care.(ii)Clause (i) does not require a provider to schedule an appointment with a different provider on behalf of a patient.(3)In implementing this subdivision, the department shall consider additional recommendations from affected stakeholders regarding the need to maintain access to in-person services without unduly restricting access to telehealth services.(4)A health care provider may establish a new patient relationship with a Medi-Cal beneficiary via video synchronous interaction consistent with any requirements imposed by the department.(5)(A)A health care provider shall not establish a new patient relationship with a Medi-Cal beneficiary via asynchronous store and forward, telephonic (audio-only) synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other virtual communication modalities, except as set forth in paragraph (4) of subdivision (g) of Section 14132.100.(B)Notwithstanding the prohibition in subparagraph (A), the department may provide for specific exceptions to this prohibition, the department may provide for specific exceptions described in clauses (i) to (iii), inclusive, which shall be developed in consultation with affected stakeholders and published in departmental guidance.(i)Notwithstanding the prohibition in subparagraph (A), a health care provider may establish a new patient relationship using an audio-only synchronous interaction when the visit is related to sensitive services, as defined in subdivision (s) of Section 56.05 of the Civil Code, and when established in accordance with department-specific requirements and consistent with federal and state law, regulations, and guidance.(ii)Notwithstanding the prohibition in subparagraph (A), a health care provider may establish a new patient relationship using an audio-only synchronous interaction when the patient requests an audio-only modality or attests they do not have access to video, and when established in accordance with department-specific requirements and consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance.(iii)Notwithstanding the prohibition in subparagraph (A), a health care provider may establish a new patient relationship using asynchronous store and forward if the visit is related to reproductive health care services, as defined in subdivision (e) of Section 1798.300 of the Civil Code, if those services meet the applicable standard of care and may be appropriately delivered via the telehealth modalities, the patient requests an asynchronous store and forward modality, and the relationship is established in accordance with department-specific requirements and consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance.(6)Subject to subdivision (k), the department may establish separate fee schedules for applicable health care services delivered via remote patient monitoring or other permissible virtual communication modalities.(7)This subdivision does not apply to Medi-Cal covered services delivered by providers via any telehealth modality to eligible inmates in state prisons, county jails, or youth correctional facilities.(d)In addition to any existing law requiring beneficiary consent to telehealth, including, but not limited to, subdivision (b) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code, all of the following shall be communicated by a health care provider to a Medi-Cal beneficiary, in writing or verbally, on at least one occasion prior to, or concurrent with, initiating the delivery of one or more health care services via telehealth to a Medi-Cal beneficiary: an explanation that beneficiaries have the right to access covered services that may be delivered via telehealth through an in-person, face-to-face visit; an explanation that use of telehealth is voluntary and that consent for the use of telehealth can be withdrawn at any time by the Medi-Cal beneficiary without affecting their ability to access covered Medi-Cal services in the future; an explanation of the availability of Medi-Cal coverage for transportation services to in-person visits when other available resources have been reasonably exhausted; and the potential limitations or risks related to receiving services through telehealth as compared to an in-person visit, to the extent any limitations or risks are identified by the provider.(1)The provider shall document in the patient record the provision of this information and the patients verbal or written acknowledgment that the information was received.(2)The department shall develop, in consultation with affected stakeholders, model language for purposes of the communication described in this subdivision.(3)This subdivision does not apply to Medi-Cal covered services delivered by providers via any telehealth modality to eligible inmates in state prisons, county jails, or youth correctional facilities.(e)(1)The department shall develop, in consultation with affected stakeholders, an informational notice to be distributed to fee-for-service Medi-Cal beneficiaries and for use by Medi-Cal managed care plans in communicating to their enrollees. Information in the notice shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following:(A)The availability of Medi-Cal covered telehealth services.(B)The beneficiarys right to access all medically necessary covered services through in-person, face-to-face visits, and a providers and Medi-Cal managed care plans responsibility to offer or arrange for that in-person care, as applicable.(C)An explanation that use of telehealth is voluntary and that consent for the use of telehealth can be withdrawn by the Medi-Cal beneficiary at any time without affecting their ability to access covered Medi-Cal services in the future.(D)An explanation of the availability of Medi-Cal coverage for transportation services to in-person visits when other available resources have been reasonably exhausted.(E)Notification of the beneficiarys right to make complaints about the offer of telehealth services in lieu of in-person care or about the quality of care delivered through telehealth.(2)The informational notice shall be translated into threshold languages determined by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 14029.91 and provided in a format that is culturally and linguistically appropriate.(3)This subdivision does not apply to Medi-Cal covered services delivered by providers via any telehealth modality to eligible inmates in state prisons, county jails, or youth correctional facilities.(f)(1)Subject to subdivision (k), the department shall reimburse health care providers of applicable health care services delivered via video synchronous interaction, synchronous audio-only modality, or asynchronous store and forward, as applicable, at payment amounts that are not less than the amounts the provider would receive if the services were delivered via in-person, face-to-face contact, so long as the services or settings meet the applicable standard of care and meet the requirements of the service code being billed.(2)Subject to subdivision (k), for applicable health care services appropriately provided by a network provider via video synchronous interaction, audio-only synchronous interaction modality, or asynchronous store and forward, as applicable, to an enrollee of a Medi-Cal managed care plan, the Medi-Cal managed care plan shall reimburse the network provider at payment amounts that are not less than the amounts the network provider would have received if the services were delivered via in-person, face-to-face contact, unless the Medi-Cal managed care plan and network provider mutually agree to reimbursement in different amounts.(g)On or before January 1, 2023, the department shall develop a research and evaluation plan that does all of the following:(1)Proposes strategies to analyze the relationship between telehealth and the following: access to care, access to in-person care, quality of care, and Medi-Cal program costs, utilization, and program integrity.(2)Examines issues using an equity framework that includes stratification by available geographic and demographic factors, including, but not limited to, race, ethnicity, primary language, age, and gender, to understand inequities and disparities in care.(3)Prioritizes research and evaluation questions that directly inform Medi-Cal policy.(h)Applicable health care services provided through asynchronous store and forward, video synchronous interaction, audio-only synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other permissible virtual communication modalities as described in this section shall comply with the privacy and security requirements contained in the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 found in Parts 160 and 164 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the Medicaid State Plan, and any other applicable state and federal statutes and regulations.(i)Notwithstanding Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, the department may implement, interpret, and make specific this section by means of all-county letters, plan letters, provider bulletins, and similar instructions, without taking any further regulatory action.(j)Consistent with the requirements of this section and subject to subdivision (k), a PACE organization approved by the department pursuant to Chapter 8.75 (commencing with Section 14591) may use video telehealth to conduct initial assessments and annual reassessments for eligibility for enrollment in the PACE program.(k)The department shall seek any federal approvals it deems necessary to implement this section. This section shall be implemented only to the extent that any necessary federal approvals are obtained and federal financial participation is available and is not otherwise jeopardized.(l)This section shall be operative on January 1, 2023, or on the operative date or dates reflected in the applicable federal approvals obtained by the department pursuant to subdivision (k), whichever is later.(m)This section does not apply to health care services provided via telehealth in an FQHC or RHC visit as described in paragraph (4) of subdivision (g) of Section 14132.100.SEC. 27.SEC. 26.The provisions of this act are severable. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 27.Section 8.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by both this bill and Assembly Bill 1503. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2026, but this bill becomes operative first, (2) each bill amends Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Assembly Bill 1503, in which case Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code, as amended by Section 8 of this bill, shall remain operative only until the operative date of Assembly Bill 1503, at which time Section 8.5 of this bill shall become operative.
SEC. 28.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
SEC. 29.This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
To ensure continued access to medication abortion that has been proven safe and effective, it is necessary for this act to take effect immediately.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)It is the longstanding public policy of this state to promote access to reproductive health care, including abortion care, without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers. Every pregnant individual has the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, a right that is secured by the California Constitution.
(b)Recent federal action and litigation has raised uncertainty about the continued availability nationwide of mifepristone, a drug that has been clinically proven to be part of a safe and effective means of providing medication abortion.
(c)The continued attacks on reproductive freedom across the country require immediate action to protect the right to abortion access, including access to medication abortion, in California.
(d)The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the United States Supreme Court have long recognized states police powers and that direct control of medical practice in the states is beyond the power of federal government (Linder v. United States (1925) 268 U.S. 5, 18).
(e)It is the intent of the Legislature to ensure continued access to medication abortion that has been proven safe and effective for two decades in California for individuals seeking abortion care.
SEC. 2.Section 601 of the Business and Professions Code is repealed.SEC. 3.Section 687 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:687.(a)A healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs shall not be subject to a civil or criminal action or disciplinary or other administrative proceeding solely on the basis that the practitioner prescribed, furnished, ordered, or administered brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to Section 355-1 of Title 21 of the United States Code, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(b)Pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), the authority of a healing arts practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion is the practice of medicine, and the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the ability of a practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion if that action is lawful under the laws of the state, are against the public policy of this state.
SEC. 4.Section 850.3 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:850.3.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against an individual licensed or certified by a healing arts board concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)A healing arts board shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)A healing arts board shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee or health care practitioner subject to this division solely because the licensee or practitioner was convicted or disciplined in another state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
SEC. 5.Section 2519 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:2519.The board may suspend, revoke, or place on probation the license of a midwife for any of the following:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out the usual functions of a licensed midwife.
(2)Conviction of a violation of Section 2052, in which event, the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence thereof.
(3)The use of advertising that is fraudulent or misleading.
(4)Obtaining or possessing in violation of law, or prescribing, or except as directed by a licensed physician and surgeon, dentist, or podiatrist administering to themselves, or furnishing or administering to another, any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code or any dangerous drug as defined in Article 8 (commencing with Section 4210) of Chapter 9 of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code.
(5)The use of any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code, or any dangerous drug as defined in Article 8 (commencing with Section 4210) of Chapter 9 of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code, or alcoholic beverages, to an extent or in a manner dangerous or injurious to themselves, any other person, or the public, or to the extent that this use impairs their ability to conduct with safety to the public the practice authorized by their license.
(6)Conviction of a criminal offense involving the prescription, consumption, or self-administration of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), or the possession of, or falsification of, a record pertaining to, the substances described in paragraph (4), in which event the record of the conviction is conclusive evidence thereof.
(7)Commitment or confinement by a court of competent jurisdiction for intemperate use of or addiction to the use of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), in which event the court order of commitment or confinement is prima facie evidence of such commitment or confinement.
(8)Falsifying, or making grossly incorrect, grossly inconsistent, or unintelligible entries in any hospital, patient, or other record pertaining to the substances described in subdivision (a).
(b)Procuring a license by fraud or misrepresentation.
(c)Conviction of a crime substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a midwife, as determined by the board.
(d)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violation of, or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter.
(e)Making or giving any false statement or information in connection with the application for issuance of a license.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required under this chapter for the issuance of a license or a certificate.
(g)Impersonating another licensed practitioner, or permitting or allowing another person to use their license or certificate for the purpose of providing midwifery services.
(h)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of, or arranging for, a violation of any of the provisions of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2221) of Chapter 5.
(i) Failing to do any of the following when required pursuant to Section 2507:
(1)Consult with a physician and surgeon.
(2)Refer a client to a physician and surgeon.
(3)Transfer a client to a hospital.
SEC. 6.Section 2761 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:2761.The board may take disciplinary action against a certified or licensed nurse or deny an application for a certificate or license for any of the following:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(1)Incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out usual certified or licensed nursing functions.
(2)A conviction of practicing medicine without a license in violation of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000), in which event the record of conviction shall be conclusive evidence thereof.
(3)The use of advertising relating to nursing that violates Section 17500.
(4)Denial of licensure, revocation, suspension, restriction, or any other disciplinary action against a health care professional license or certificate by another state or territory of the United States, by any other government agency, or by another California health care professional licensing board. A certified copy of the decision or judgment shall be conclusive evidence of that action.
(b)Procuring their certificate or license by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
(c)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violating of, or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter or regulations adopted pursuant to it.
(d)Making or giving any false statement or information in connection with the application for issuance of a certificate or license.
(e)Conviction of a felony or of any offense substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a registered nurse, in which event the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence thereof.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required under this chapter for the issuance of a certificate or license.
(g)Impersonating another certified or licensed practitioner, or permitting or allowing another person to use their certificate or license for the purpose of nursing the sick or afflicted.
(h)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of, or arranging for, a violation of any of the provisions of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2220) of Chapter 5.
(i)Holding oneself out to the public or to any practitioner of the healing arts as a nurse practitioner or as meeting the standards established by the board for a nurse practitioner unless meeting the standards established by the board pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 2834) or holding oneself out to the public as being certified by the board as a nurse anesthetist, nurse midwife, clinical nurse specialist, or public health nurse unless the person is at the time certified by the board.
(j)(1)Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines of the board, thereby risking transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from licensed or certified nurse to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensed or certified nurse. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider referencing the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, guidelines, and regulations pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the Medical Board of California, the Podiatric Medical Board of California, the Dental Board of California, and the Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this subdivision.
(2)The board shall seek to ensure that licentiates and others regulated by the board are informed of the responsibility of licentiates to minimize the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from health care provider to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to health care provider, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risks of transmission.
SEC. 7.Section 2878 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:2878.The board may suspend or revoke a license issued under this chapter for any of the following:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:
(1)Incompetence, or gross negligence in carrying out usual nursing functions.
(2)A conviction of practicing medicine without a license in violation of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000), in which event the record of conviction shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction.
(3)The use of advertising relating to nursing which violates Section 17500.
(4)The use of excessive force upon or the mistreatment or abuse of any patient. For the purposes of this paragraph, excessive force means force clearly in excess of that which would normally be applied in similar clinical circumstances.
(5)The failure to maintain confidentiality of patient medical information, except as disclosure is otherwise permitted or required by law.
(6)Failure to report to the commission any act prohibited by this section.
(b)Procuring a certificate by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
(c)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violating of, or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter.
(d)Making or giving any false statement or information in connection with the application for issuance of a license.
(e)Conviction of a crime substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a licensed vocational nurse, in which event the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required under this chapter for the issuance of a license.
(g)Impersonating another practitioner, misrepresenting professional credentials or licensure status, or permitting another person to use the licensees certificate or license.
(h)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of or arranging for a violation of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2220) of Chapter 5.
(i)The commission of any act involving dishonesty, when that action is related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(j)The commission of any act punishable as a sexually related crime, if that act is substantially related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(k)Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines of the board, thereby risking transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from licensee to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensee. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider referencing the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, guidelines, and regulations pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the Medical Board of California, the Podiatric Medical Board of California, the Board of Dental Examiners, and the Board of Registered Nursing, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this subdivision.
(l)The board shall seek to ensure that licentiates and others regulated by the board are informed of the responsibility of licentiates and others to follow infection control guidelines, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases.
SEC. 8.Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:4076.(a)A pharmacist shall not dispense a prescription except in a container that meets the requirements of state and federal law and is correctly labeled with all of the following:
(1)Except when the prescriber or the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6 orders otherwise, either the manufacturers trade name of the drug or the generic name and the name of the manufacturer. Commonly used abbreviations may be used. Preparations containing two or more active ingredients may be identified by the manufacturers trade name or the commonly used name or the principal active ingredients.
(2)The directions for the use of the drug.
(3)The name of the patient or patients.
(4)The name of the prescriber or, if applicable, the name of the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6.
(5)The date of issue.
(6)The name and address of the pharmacy, and prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(7)The strength of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(8)The quantity of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(9)The expiration date of the effectiveness of the drug dispensed.
(10)The condition or purpose for which the drug was prescribed if the condition or purpose is indicated on the prescription.
(11)(A)Commencing January 1, 2006, the physical description of the dispensed medication, including its color, shape, and any identification code that appears on the tablets or capsules, except as follows:
(i)Prescriptions dispensed by a veterinarian.
(ii)An exemption from the requirements of this paragraph shall be granted to a new drug for the first 120 days that the drug is on the market and for the 90 days during which the national reference file has no description on file.
(iii)Dispensed medications for which no physical description exists in a commercially available database.
(B)This paragraph applies to outpatient pharmacies only.
(C)The information required by this paragraph may be printed on an auxiliary label that is affixed to the prescription container.
(D)This paragraph shall not become operative if the board, prior to January 1, 2006, adopts regulations that mandate the same labeling requirements set forth in this paragraph.
(b)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescribed drug by means of a unit dose medication system, as defined by administrative regulation, for a patient in a skilled nursing, intermediate care, or other health care facility, the requirements of this section will be satisfied if the unit dose medication system contains the aforementioned information or the information is otherwise readily available at the time of drug administration.
(c)If a pharmacist dispenses a dangerous drug or device in a facility licensed pursuant to Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, it is not necessary to include on individual unit dose containers for a specific patient, the name of the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6.
(d)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescription drug for use in a facility licensed pursuant to Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, it is not necessary to include the information required in paragraph (11) of subdivision (a) when the prescription drug is administered to a patient by a person licensed under the Medical Practice Act (Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000)), the Nursing Practice Act (Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 2700)), or the Vocational Nursing Practice Act (Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 2840)), who is acting within the scope of practice.
(e)A pharmacist shall use professional judgment to provide a patient with directions for use that enhance the patients understanding of those directions, consistent with the prescribers instructions.
(f)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other law, a pharmacist may dispense a drug prescribed pursuant to Section 120582 of the Health and Safety Code and label the drug without the name of an individual for whom the drug is intended if the prescription includes the words expedited partner therapy or the letters EPT.
(2)A pharmacist who prescribes, dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders EPT, as authorized in subdivision (f), shall not be liable in, and shall not be subject to, a civil, criminal, or administrative action, sanction, or penalty for rendering EPT, if the use of EPT is in compliance with this section, except in cases of intentional misconduct, gross negligence, or wanton or reckless activity.
(3)A pharmacist who provides EPT under this section shall provide written notification that describes the right of an individual who receives EPT to consult with a pharmacist about the medication dispensed and additional information regarding possible drug interactions.
(g)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other law, a pharmacist may, at their discretion, dispense brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the patient as required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), the name of the prescriber as required in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a), or the name and address of the pharmacy as required in paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) if the prescription is labeled with a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(2)A pharmacist who dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion, as authorized in paragraph (1), shall maintain a log with the prescription numbers and the information required in paragraphs (1) to (10), inclusive, of subdivision (a).
(3)Notwithstanding Section 4081, all records maintained under paragraph (2) shall not be open to inspection by law enforcement without a valid, court-issued subpoena.
(4)This subdivision does not prohibit the investigation of an activity that is punishable as a crime under the laws of this state, provided that records maintained under paragraph (2) are not shared with an individual or entity from another state.
(5)A pharmacist shall inform the patient that the pharmacist is dispensing brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion as authorized by this subdivision.
SEC. 9.Section 4318 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:4318.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)The board shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)The board shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
SEC. 10.Section 4521 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:4521.The board may suspend or revoke a license issued under this chapter for any of the following reasons:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:
(1)Incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out usual psychiatric technician functions.
(2)A conviction of practicing medicine without a license in violation of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000) of Division 2, the record of conviction being conclusive evidence thereof.
(3)The use of advertising relating to psychiatric technician services which violates Section 17500.
(4)Obtain or possess in violation of law, or prescribe, or, except as directed by a licensed physician and surgeon, dentist, or podiatrist, administer to the licensee or furnish or administer to another, any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code or any dangerous drug as defined in Section 4022.
(5)Use any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code, or any dangerous drug as defined in Section 4022, or alcoholic beverages, to an extent or in a manner dangerous or injurious to the licensee, any other person, or the public or to the extent that the use impairs the ability to conduct with safety to the public the practice authorized by their license.
(6)Be convicted of a criminal offense involving the falsification of records concerning prescription, possession, or consumption of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), in which event the record of the conviction is conclusive evidence of the conviction. The board may inquire into the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime in order to fix the degree of discipline.
(7)Be committed or confined by a court of competent jurisdiction for intemperate use of or addiction to the use of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), in which event the court order of commitment or confinement is prima facie evidence of the commitment or confinement.
(8)Falsify, or make grossly incorrect, grossly inconsistent, or unintelligible entries in any hospital, patient, or other record pertaining to the substances described in paragraph (4).
(b)Procuring a certificate or license by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
(c)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violation of, or conspiring to violate any provision or terms of this chapter.
(d)Giving any false statement or information in connection with an application.
(e)Conviction of any offense substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a psychiatric technician, in which event the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction. The board may inquire into the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime in order to fix the degree of discipline.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required by this chapter.
(g)Impersonating another practitioner, or permitting another person to use the licensees certificate or license.
(h)The use of excessive force upon or the mistreatment or abuse of any patient.
(i)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of or arranging for a violation of any of the provisions of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2220) of Chapter 5 of Division 2.
(j)Failure to maintain confidentiality of patient medical information, except as disclosure is otherwise permitted or required by law.
(k)Failure to report to the commission any act prohibited by this section.
(l)The commission of any act punishable as a sexually related crime, if that act is substantially related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(m)The commission of any act involving dishonesty, when that action is substantially related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(n)Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines, thereby risking transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from licensee to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensee. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, guidelines, and regulations pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the Medical Board of California, the Board of Dental Examiners, and the Board of Registered Nursing, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this section.
(o)The board shall seek to ensure that licentiates and others regulated by the board are informed of the responsibility of licentiates and others to follow infection control guidelines, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases.
SEC. 11.Section 6925 of the Family Code is amended to read:6925.(a)A minor may consent to medical care related to the prevention or treatment of pregnancy.
(b)This section does not authorize a minor to be sterilized without the consent of the minors parent or guardian.
SEC. 12.Section 1220.2 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:1220.2.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensee concerning the transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)The department shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)The department shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
SEC. 13.Section 1265.12 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:1265.12.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensee concerning the transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)The department shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)The department shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
SEC. 14.Section 1367.21 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1367.21.(a)A health care service plan contract that covers prescription drug benefits shall not be issued, amended, delivered, or renewed in this state if the plan limits or excludes coverage for a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), provided that all of the following conditions have been met:
(1)The drug is approved by the FDA.
(2)(A)The drug is prescribed by a participating licensed health care professional for the treatment of a life-threatening condition; or
(B)The drug is prescribed by a participating licensed health care professional for the treatment of a chronic and seriously debilitating condition, the drug is medically necessary to treat that condition, and the drug is on the plan formulary. If the drug is not on the plan formulary, the participating subscribers request shall be considered pursuant to the process required by Section 1367.24.
(3)The drug has been recognized for treatment of that condition by any of the following:
(A)The American Hospital Formulary Services Drug Information.
(B)One of the following compendia, if recognized by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as part of an anticancer chemotherapeutic regimen:
(i)The Elsevier Gold Standards Clinical Pharmacology.
(ii)The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Drug and Biologics Compendium.
(iii)The Thomson Micromedex DrugDex.
(C)Two articles from major peer reviewed medical journals that present data supporting the proposed off-label use or uses as generally safe and effective unless there is clear and convincing contradictory evidence presented in a major peer reviewed medical journal.
(b)(1)A health care service plan contract that covers prescription drug benefits shall not be issued, amended, delivered, or renewed in this state if the contract limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to Section 355-1 of Title 21 of the United States Code, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(2)A health care service plan contract that covers prescription drug benefits shall include coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, even if the drug has not been approved by the FDA for abortion if the requirements of paragraph (3) have been met, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(3)If name brand or generic mifepristone has not been approved by the FDA for abortion, coverage is required pursuant to paragraph (2) if the drug is a recognized medication for abortion by the World Health Organization (WHO) Model List of Essential Medicines, the WHO abortion care guideline, or the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine Consensus Study Report, or if the state approves its use based on peer-reviewed studies and prior approval of the drug that is no longer in effect.
(c)It shall be the responsibility of the participating prescriber to submit to the plan documentation supporting compliance with the requirements of subdivision (a), if requested by the plan.
(d)Any coverage required by this section shall also include medically necessary services associated with the administration of a drug, subject to the conditions of the contract.
(e)For purposes of this section, life-threatening means either or both of the following:
(1)Diseases or conditions where the likelihood of death is high unless the course of the disease is interrupted.
(2)Diseases or conditions with potentially fatal outcomes, where the end point of clinical intervention is survival.
(f)For purposes of this section, chronic and seriously debilitating means diseases or conditions that require ongoing treatment to maintain remission or prevent deterioration and cause significant long-term morbidity.
(g)The provision of drugs and services when required by this section shall not, in itself, give rise to liability on the part of the plan.
(h)This section does not prohibit the use of a formulary, copayment, technology assessment panel, or similar mechanism as a means for appropriately controlling the utilization of a drug that is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA.
(i)If a plan denies coverage pursuant to this section on the basis that its use is experimental or investigational, that decision is subject to review under Section 1370.4.
(j)Health care service plan contracts for the delivery of Medi-Cal services under the Waxman-Duffy Prepaid Health Plan Act (Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200) of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code) are exempt from the requirements of this section.
SEC. 15.Section 1375.61 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1375.61.(a)A contract between a health care service plan and a provider of health care services shall not contain any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, based solely on either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another disciplinary action in another state, if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)A health care service plan shall not discriminate, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)This section does not apply to a civil judgment, a criminal conviction, or a disciplinary action imposed in another state based upon conduct that would subject a provider to claim, charge, or action under the laws of this state.
SEC. 16.Section 111376 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:111376.(a)The department may adopt regulations relating to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion by including brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion within, or excluding brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion from, the requirements of this article, whether or not the inclusion or exclusion of the drug is in accordance with federal law.
(b)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, this article shall not apply to brand name or generic mifepristone in the event of a labeling change or in the absence of its United States Food and Drug Administration approval if it is recommended for use by the World Health Organization and its labeling was true and accurate at the time of manufacture, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
SEC. 17.Section 111480 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:111480.(a)A drug or device sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device shall be exempt from the labeling requirements of Sections 111335, 111340, 111355, 111360, 111365, 111375, 111380, 111385, 111395, 111415, and 111420, if the drug or device bears a label displaying all of the following:
(1)Except when the prescriber orders otherwise, either the manufacturers trade name of the drug, or the generic name and the name of the manufacturer. Commonly used abbreviations may be used. Preparations containing two or more active ingredients may be identified by the manufacturers trade name or the commonly used name or the principal active ingredients.
(2)The directions for the use of the drug or device.
(3)The name of the patient(s).
(4)The name of the prescriber.
(5)The date of issue.
(6)The name, address of the furnisher, and prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(7)The strength of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(8)The quantity of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(9)The expiration date of the effectiveness of the drug or device if the information is included on the original label of the manufacturer of the drug or device.
(b)Brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device shall be exempt from the labeling requirements of Sections 111335, 111340, 111355, 111360, 111365, 111375, 111380, 111385, 111395, 111415, and 111420, if the label complies with subdivision (g) of Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code.
(c)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescribed drug by means of a unit dose medication system, as defined by administrative regulation, for a patient in a skilled nursing, intermediate care or other health care facility, the requirements of subdivision (a) shall be satisfied if the unit dose medication system contains the information required pursuant to subdivision (a) or the information is otherwise readily available at the time of drug administration.
(d)The exemption in subdivision (a) shall not apply to any drug or device dispensed in the course of the conduct of a business of dispensing drugs or devices pursuant to diagnosis by mail, or to a drug or device dispensed in violation of Section 111470.
SEC. 18.Section 10123.195 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10123.195.(a)A group or individual disability insurance policy issued, delivered, or renewed in this state or certificate of group disability insurance issued, delivered, or renewed in this state pursuant to a master group policy issued, delivered, or renewed in another state that, as a provision of hospital, medical, or surgical services, directly or indirectly covers prescription drugs shall not limit or exclude coverage for a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), provided that all of the following conditions have been met:
(1)The drug is approved by the FDA.
(2)(A)The drug is prescribed by a contracting licensed health care professional for the treatment of a life-threatening condition; or
(B)The drug is prescribed by a contracting licensed health care professional for the treatment of a chronic and seriously debilitating condition, the drug is medically necessary to treat that condition, and the drug is on the insurers formulary, if any.
(3)The drug has been recognized for treatment of that condition by any of the following:
(A)The American Hospital Formulary Services Drug Information.
(B)One of the following compendia, if recognized by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as part of an anticancer chemotherapeutic regimen:
(i)The Elsevier Gold Standards Clinical Pharmacology.
(ii)The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Drug and Biologics Compendium.
(iii)The Thomson Micromedex DrugDex.
(C)Two articles from major peer reviewed medical journals that present data supporting the proposed off-label use or uses as generally safe and effective unless there is clear and convincing contradictory evidence presented in a major peer reviewed medical journal.
(b)(1)A group or individual disability health insurance policy issued, delivered, or renewed in this state or certificate of group disability health insurance issued, delivered, or renewed in this state pursuant to a master group policy issued, delivered, or renewed in another state that, as a provision of hospital, medical, or surgical services, directly or indirectly covers prescription drugs shall not limit or exclude coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to Section 355-1 of Title 21 of the United States Code, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(2)A group or individual disability health insurance policy issued, delivered, or renewed in this state or certificate of group disability health insurance issued, delivered, or renewed in this state pursuant to a master group policy issued, delivered, or renewed in another state that, as a provision of hospital, medical, or surgical services, directly or indirectly covers prescription drugs shall include coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, even if the drug has not been approved by the FDA for abortion if the requirements of paragraph (3) have been met, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(3)If name brand or generic mifepristone has not been approved by the FDA for abortion, coverage is required pursuant to paragraph (2) if the drug is a recognized medication for abortion by the World Health Organization (WHO) Model List of Essential Medicines, the WHO abortion care guideline, or the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine Consensus Study Report, or if the state approves its use based on peer-reviewed studies and prior approval of the drug that is no longer in effect.
(c)It shall be the responsibility of the contracting prescriber to submit to the insurer documentation supporting compliance with the requirements of subdivision (a), if requested by the insurer.
(d)Any coverage required by this section shall also include medically necessary services associated with the administration of a drug subject to the conditions of the policy.
(e)For purposes of this section, life-threatening means either or both of the following:
(1)Diseases or conditions where the likelihood of death is high unless the course of the disease is interrupted.
(2)Diseases or conditions with potentially fatal outcomes, where the end point of clinical intervention is survival.
(f)For purposes of this section, chronic and seriously debilitating means diseases or conditions that require ongoing treatment to maintain remission or prevent deterioration and cause significant long-term morbidity.
(g)The provision of drugs and services when required by this section shall not, in itself, give rise to liability on the part of the insurer.
(h)This section shall not apply to a policy of disability insurance that covers hospital, medical, or surgical expenses that is issued outside of California to an employer whose principal place of business is located outside of California.
(i)This section does not prohibit the use of a formulary, copayment, technology assessment panel, or similar mechanism as a means for appropriately controlling the utilization of a drug that is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA.
(j)If an insurer denies coverage pursuant to this section on the basis that its use is experimental or investigational, that decision is subject to review under the Independent Medical Review System of Article 3.5 (commencing with Section 10169).
(k)This section is not applicable to vision-only, dental-only, Medicare or Champus supplement, disability income, long-term care, accident-only, specified disease or hospital confinement indemnity insurance.
SEC. 19.Section 10133.641 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10133.641.(a)A contract between a health insurer and a provider of health care services shall not contain any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, based solely on either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another professional disciplinary action in another state, if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)A health insurer shall not discriminate, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another professional disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)This section does not apply to a civil judgment, a criminal conviction, or a disciplinary action imposed in another state based upon conduct that would subject a provider to claim, charge, or action under the laws of this state.
(d)The commissioner may enforce this section pursuant to Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 11400) or Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 11500) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. This subdivision does not impair or restrict the commissioners enforcement authority pursuant to another provision of this code or the Administrative Procedure Act.
SEC. 20.Section 1108 of the Penal Code is repealed.SEC. 21.Section 3405 of the Penal Code is amended to read:3405.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by an incarcerated person, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Impermissible restrictions include, but are not limited to, imposing gestational limits inconsistent with state law, unreasonably delaying access to the procedure, or requiring court-ordered transport. Incarcerated persons found to be pregnant and desiring abortions, shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to state and federal law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion after giving informed consent.
(b)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all incarcerated persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 22.Section 4028 of the Penal Code is amended to read:4028.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by a person detained in any local detention facility, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Impermissible restrictions include, but are not limited to, imposing gestational limits inconsistent with state law, unreasonably delaying access to the procedure, or requiring court-ordered transportation. Persons found to be pregnant and desiring abortions shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to state and federal law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion, after providing informed consent.
(b)For the purposes of this section, local detention facility means any city, county, or regional facility used for the confinement for more than 24 hours of a person capable of becoming pregnant.
(c)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all incarcerated persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 23.Section 220 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:220.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by an individual detained in any local juvenile facility, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Individuals found to be pregnant and desiring abortions, shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion.
(b)For the purposes of this section, local juvenile facility means any city, county, or regional facility used for the confinement of juveniles for more than 24 hours.
(c)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all committed persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 24.Section 1773 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:1773.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by an individual committed to the Division of Juvenile Facilities, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Individuals found to be pregnant and desiring abortions shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion.
(b)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all committed persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 25.Section 14043.8 is added to the Welfare and Institutions Code, to read:14043.8.(a)The department shall update the Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirement and procedures for remote service providers who offer reproductive health care services primarily through telehealth modalities seeking enrollment in the Medi-Cal program to report an administrative location as their service address. That administrative location shall be exempt from the following established place of business requirements listed in Section 51000.60(c) of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations:
(1)Displays regular and permanently posted business hours.
(2)Is identifiable as a medical or health care provider or business by permanently attached signage that identifies the name of the provider or business as shown on the application.
(3)Obtains and maintains liability insurance coverage, which covers premises and operation, in an amount not less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) per claim with a minimum annual aggregate of not less than three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) from an authorized insurer, pursuant to Section 700 of the Insurance Code.
(b)The department shall modify the requirement set forth in Section 51000.4 of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations to permit the use of a cellular telephone as the primary business phone for reproductive health care providers.
(c)A provider subject to this section shall meet current Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirements and standards.
(d)For purposes of this section, reproductive health care services has the same meaning as defined in Section 1798.300 of the Civil Code when those services meet the applicable standard of care and may be appropriately delivered via the telehealth modalities.
SEC. 26.Section 14132.725 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:14132.725.(a)For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Asynchronous store and forward has the same meaning as set forth in subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code. Transmission under asynchronous store and forward also includes asynchronous electronic transmission initiated directly by patients, including through mobile telephone applications.
(2)Border community means border areas adjacent to the State of California where it is customary practice for California residents to use medical resources in adjacent areas outside the state. Under these circumstances, program controls and limitations are the same as for services rendered by health care providers within the state.
(3)Health care provider has the same meaning as set forth in paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code, and shall be either enrolled as a Medi-Cal rendering provider, or a nonphysician medical practitioner affiliated with an enrolled Medi-Cal provider group. Health care provider also includes any provider type designated by the department pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b). The enrolled Medi-Cal provider or provider group for which the health care provider renders services via telehealth shall meet all Medi-Cal requirements and shall be located in the state or a border community.
(4)Health care service plan has the same meaning as set forth in subdivision (f) of Section 1345 of the Health and Safety Code.
(5)Medi-Cal managed care plan has the same meaning as set forth in subdivision (j) of Section 14184.101.
(6)Network provider has the same meaning as set forth in Section 438.2 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
(7)Telehealth has the same meaning as set forth in paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code.
(b)(1)Subject to subdivision (k), in-person, face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient is not required under the Medi-Cal program for covered health care services and provider types designated by the department, when provided by video synchronous interaction, asynchronous store and forward, audio-only synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other permissible virtual communication modalities, when those services and settings meet the applicable standard of care and meet the requirements of the service code being billed.
(2)(A)In implementing this section, the department shall designate and periodically update the covered health care services and provider types, including required licensing and credentialing criteria, as applicable, which may be appropriately delivered via the telehealth modalities described in this subdivision.
(B)Applicable health care services appropriately provided through video synchronous interaction, asynchronous store and forward, audio-only synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other permissible virtual communication modalities are subject to billing, reimbursement, and utilization management policies imposed by the department. Subject to subdivision (k), utilization management protocols adopted by the department pursuant to this section shall be consistent with, and no more restrictive than, those authorized for health care service plans pursuant to Section 1374.13 of the Health and Safety Code.
(c)(1)(A)Pursuant to an effective date designated by the department that is no sooner than January 1, 2024, a Medi-Cal provider furnishing applicable health care services via audio-only synchronous interaction shall also offer those same health care services via video synchronous interaction to preserve beneficiary choice.
(B)(i)The department may provide specific exceptions to the requirement specified in subparagraph (A), based on a Medi-Cal providers access to requisite technologies, which shall be developed in consultation with affected stakeholders and published in departmental guidance.
(ii)In making exceptions to the requirement specified in subparagraph (A), in addition to the provisions in clause (i), the department may also take into consideration the availability of broadband access based on speed standards set by the Federal Communications Commission, pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-104) or other applicable federal law or regulation.
(2)Effective on the date designated by the department pursuant to paragraph (1), a provider furnishing services through video synchronous interaction or audio-only synchronous interaction shall also maintain and follow protocols to do one of the following:
(A)Offer those services via in-person, face-to-face contact.
(B)(i)Arrange for a referral to, and a facilitation of, in-person care that does not require a patient to independently contact a different provider to arrange for that care.
(ii)Clause (i) does not require a provider to schedule an appointment with a different provider on behalf of a patient.
(3)In implementing this subdivision, the department shall consider additional recommendations from affected stakeholders regarding the need to maintain access to in-person services without unduly restricting access to telehealth services.
(4)A health care provider may establish a new patient relationship with a Medi-Cal beneficiary via video synchronous interaction consistent with any requirements imposed by the department.
(5)(A)A health care provider shall not establish a new patient relationship with a Medi-Cal beneficiary via asynchronous store and forward, telephonic (audio-only) synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other virtual communication modalities, except as set forth in paragraph (4) of subdivision (g) of Section 14132.100.
(B)Notwithstanding the prohibition in subparagraph (A), the department may provide for specific exceptions to this prohibition, the department may provide for specific exceptions described in clauses (i) to (iii), inclusive, which shall be developed in consultation with affected stakeholders and published in departmental guidance.
(i)Notwithstanding the prohibition in subparagraph (A), a health care provider may establish a new patient relationship using an audio-only synchronous interaction or asynchronous store and forward when the visit is related to sensitive services, as defined in subdivision (s) of Section 56.05 of the Civil Code, and when established in accordance with department-specific requirements and consistent with federal and state law, regulations, and guidance.
(ii)Notwithstanding the prohibition in subparagraph (A), a health care provider may establish a new patient relationship using an audio-only synchronous interaction when the patient requests an audio-only modality or attests they do not have access to video, and when established in accordance with department-specific requirements and consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance.
(iii)Notwithstanding the prohibition in subparagraph (A), a health care provider may establish a new patient relationship using asynchronous store and forward if the visit is related to reproductive health care services, as defined in subdivision (e) of Section 1798.300 of the Civil Code, if those services meet the applicable standard of care and may be appropriately delivered via the telehealth modalities, the patient requests an asynchronous store and forward modality, and the relationship is established in accordance with department-specific requirements and consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance.
(6)Subject to subdivision (k), the department may establish separate fee schedules for applicable health care services delivered via remote patient monitoring or other permissible virtual communication modalities.
(7)This subdivision does not apply to Medi-Cal covered services delivered by providers via any telehealth modality to eligible inmates in state prisons, county jails, or youth correctional facilities.
(d)In addition to any existing law requiring beneficiary consent to telehealth, including, but not limited to, subdivision (b) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code, all of the following shall be communicated by a health care provider to a Medi-Cal beneficiary, in writing or verbally, on at least one occasion prior to, or concurrent with, initiating the delivery of one or more health care services via telehealth to a Medi-Cal beneficiary: an explanation that beneficiaries have the right to access covered services that may be delivered via telehealth through an in-person, face-to-face visit; an explanation that use of telehealth is voluntary and that consent for the use of telehealth can be withdrawn at any time by the Medi-Cal beneficiary without affecting their ability to access covered Medi-Cal services in the future; an explanation of the availability of Medi-Cal coverage for transportation services to in-person visits when other available resources have been reasonably exhausted; and the potential limitations or risks related to receiving services through telehealth as compared to an in-person visit, to the extent any limitations or risks are identified by the provider.
(1)The provider shall document in the patient record the provision of this information and the patients verbal or written acknowledgment that the information was received.
(2)The department shall develop, in consultation with affected stakeholders, model language for purposes of the communication described in this subdivision.
(3)This subdivision does not apply to Medi-Cal covered services delivered by providers via any telehealth modality to eligible inmates in state prisons, county jails, or youth correctional facilities.
(e)(1)The department shall develop, in consultation with affected stakeholders, an informational notice to be distributed to fee-for-service Medi-Cal beneficiaries and for use by Medi-Cal managed care plans in communicating to their enrollees. Information in the notice shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following:
(A)The availability of Medi-Cal covered telehealth services.
(B)The beneficiarys right to access all medically necessary covered services through in-person, face-to-face visits, and a providers and Medi-Cal managed care plans responsibility to offer or arrange for that in-person care, as applicable.
(C)An explanation that use of telehealth is voluntary and that consent for the use of telehealth can be withdrawn by the Medi-Cal beneficiary at any time without affecting their ability to access covered Medi-Cal services in the future.
(D)An explanation of the availability of Medi-Cal coverage for transportation services to in-person visits when other available resources have been reasonably exhausted.
(E)Notification of the beneficiarys right to make complaints about the offer of telehealth services in lieu of in-person care or about the quality of care delivered through telehealth.
(2)The informational notice shall be translated into threshold languages determined by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 14029.91 and provided in a format that is culturally and linguistically appropriate.
(3)This subdivision does not apply to Medi-Cal covered services delivered by providers via any telehealth modality to eligible inmates in state prisons, county jails, or youth correctional facilities.
(f)(1)Subject to subdivision (k), the department shall reimburse health care providers of applicable health care services delivered via video synchronous interaction, synchronous audio-only modality, or asynchronous store and forward, as applicable, at payment amounts that are not less than the amounts the provider would receive if the services were delivered via in-person, face-to-face contact, so long as the services or settings meet the applicable standard of care and meet the requirements of the service code being billed.
(2)Subject to subdivision (k), for applicable health care services appropriately provided by a network provider via video synchronous interaction, audio-only synchronous interaction modality, or asynchronous store and forward, as applicable, to an enrollee of a Medi-Cal managed care plan, the Medi-Cal managed care plan shall reimburse the network provider at payment amounts that are not less than the amounts the network provider would have received if the services were delivered via in-person, face-to-face contact, unless the Medi-Cal managed care plan and network provider mutually agree to reimbursement in different amounts.
(g)On or before January 1, 2023, the department shall develop a research and evaluation plan that does all of the following:
(1)Proposes strategies to analyze the relationship between telehealth and the following: access to care, access to in-person care, quality of care, and Medi-Cal program costs, utilization, and program integrity.
(2)Examines issues using an equity framework that includes stratification by available geographic and demographic factors, including, but not limited to, race, ethnicity, primary language, age, and gender, to understand inequities and disparities in care.
(3)Prioritizes research and evaluation questions that directly inform Medi-Cal policy.
(h)Applicable health care services provided through asynchronous store and forward, video synchronous interaction, audio-only synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other permissible virtual communication modalities as described in this section shall comply with the privacy and security requirements contained in the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 found in Parts 160 and 164 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the Medicaid State Plan, and any other applicable state and federal statutes and regulations.
(i)Notwithstanding Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, the department may implement, interpret, and make specific this section by means of all-county letters, plan letters, provider bulletins, and similar instructions, without taking any further regulatory action.
(j)Consistent with the requirements of this section and subject to subdivision (k), a PACE organization approved by the department pursuant to Chapter 8.75 (commencing with Section 14591) may use video telehealth to conduct initial assessments and annual reassessments for eligibility for enrollment in the PACE program.
(k)The department shall seek any federal approvals it deems necessary to implement this section. This section shall be implemented only to the extent that any necessary federal approvals are obtained and federal financial participation is available and is not otherwise jeopardized.
(l)This section shall be operative on January 1, 2023, or on the operative date or dates reflected in the applicable federal approvals obtained by the department pursuant to subdivision (k), whichever is later.
(m)This section does not apply to health care services provided via telehealth in an FQHC or RHC visit as described in paragraph (4) of subdivision (g) of Section 14132.100.
SEC. 27.The provisions of this act are severable. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 28.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
SEC. 29.This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
To ensure continued access to medication abortion that has been proven safe and effective, it is necessary for this act to take effect immediately.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)It is the longstanding public policy of this state to promote access to reproductive health care, including abortion care, without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers. Every pregnant individual has the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, a right that is secured by the California Constitution.
(b)Recent federal action and litigation has raised uncertainty about the continued availability nationwide of mifepristone, a drug that has been clinically proven to be part of a safe and effective means of providing medication abortion.
(c)The continued attacks on reproductive freedom across the country require immediate action to protect the right to abortion access, including access to medication abortion, in California.
(d)The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the United States Supreme Court have long recognized states police powers and that direct control of medical practice in the states is beyond the power of federal government (Linder v. United States (1925) 268 U.S. 5, 18).
(e)It is the intent of the Legislature to ensure continued access to medication abortion that has been proven safe and effective for two decades in California for individuals seeking abortion care.
SEC. 2.Section 601 of the Business and Professions Code is repealed.SEC. 3.Section 687 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:687.(a)A healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs shall not be subject to a civil or criminal action or disciplinary or other administrative proceeding solely on the basis that the practitioner prescribed, furnished, ordered, or administered brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to Section 355-1 of Title 21 of the United States Code, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(b)Pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), the authority of a healing arts practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion is the practice of medicine, and the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the ability of a practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion if that action is lawful under the laws of the state, are against the public policy of this state.
SEC. 4.Section 850.3 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:850.3.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against an individual licensed or certified by a healing arts board concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)A healing arts board shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)A healing arts board shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee or health care practitioner subject to this division solely because the licensee or practitioner was convicted or disciplined in another state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
(d)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.SEC. 5.Section 2519 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:2519.The board may suspend, revoke, or place on probation the license of a midwife for any of the following:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out the usual functions of a licensed midwife.
(2)Conviction of a violation of Section 2052, in which event, the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence thereof.
(3)The use of advertising that is fraudulent or misleading.
(4)Obtaining or possessing in violation of law, or prescribing, or except as directed by a licensed physician and surgeon, dentist, or podiatrist administering to themselves, or furnishing or administering to another, any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code or any dangerous drug as defined in Article 8 (commencing with Section 4210) of Chapter 9 of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code.
(5)The use of any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code, or any dangerous drug as defined in Article 8 (commencing with Section 4210) of Chapter 9 of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code, or alcoholic beverages, to an extent or in a manner dangerous or injurious to themselves, any other person, or the public, or to the extent that this use impairs their ability to conduct with safety to the public the practice authorized by their license.
(6)Conviction of a criminal offense involving the prescription, consumption, or self-administration of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), or the possession of, or falsification of, a record pertaining to, the substances described in paragraph (4), in which event the record of the conviction is conclusive evidence thereof.
(7)Commitment or confinement by a court of competent jurisdiction for intemperate use of or addiction to the use of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), in which event the court order of commitment or confinement is prima facie evidence of such commitment or confinement.
(8)Falsifying, or making grossly incorrect, grossly inconsistent, or unintelligible entries in any hospital, patient, or other record pertaining to the substances described in subdivision (a).
(b)Procuring a license by fraud or misrepresentation.
(c)Conviction of a crime substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a midwife, as determined by the board.
(d)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violation of, or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter.
(e)Making or giving any false statement or information in connection with the application for issuance of a license.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required under this chapter for the issuance of a license or a certificate.
(g)Impersonating another licensed practitioner, or permitting or allowing another person to use their license or certificate for the purpose of providing midwifery services.
(h)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of, or arranging for, a violation of any of the provisions of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2221) of Chapter 5.
(i) Failing to do any of the following when required pursuant to Section 2507:
(1)Consult with a physician and surgeon.
(2)Refer a client to a physician and surgeon.
(3)Transfer a client to a hospital.
SEC. 6.Section 2761 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:2761.The board may take disciplinary action against a certified or licensed nurse or deny an application for a certificate or license for any of the following:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(1)Incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out usual certified or licensed nursing functions.
(2)A conviction of practicing medicine without a license in violation of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000), in which event the record of conviction shall be conclusive evidence thereof.
(3)The use of advertising relating to nursing that violates Section 17500.
(4)Denial of licensure, revocation, suspension, restriction, or any other disciplinary action against a health care professional license or certificate by another state or territory of the United States, by any other government agency, or by another California health care professional licensing board. A certified copy of the decision or judgment shall be conclusive evidence of that action.
(b)Procuring their certificate or license by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
(c)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violating of, or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter or regulations adopted pursuant to it.
(d)Making or giving any false statement or information in connection with the application for issuance of a certificate or license.
(e)Conviction of a felony or of any offense substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a registered nurse, in which event the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence thereof.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required under this chapter for the issuance of a certificate or license.
(g)Impersonating another certified or licensed practitioner, or permitting or allowing another person to use their certificate or license for the purpose of nursing the sick or afflicted.
(h)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of, or arranging for, a violation of any of the provisions of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2220) of Chapter 5.
(i)Holding oneself out to the public or to any practitioner of the healing arts as a nurse practitioner or as meeting the standards established by the board for a nurse practitioner unless meeting the standards established by the board pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 2834) or holding oneself out to the public as being certified by the board as a nurse anesthetist, nurse midwife, clinical nurse specialist, or public health nurse unless the person is at the time certified by the board.
(j)(1)Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines of the board, thereby risking transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from licensed or certified nurse to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensed or certified nurse. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider referencing the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, guidelines, and regulations pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the Medical Board of California, the Podiatric Medical Board of California, the Dental Board of California, and the Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this subdivision.
(2)The board shall seek to ensure that licentiates and others regulated by the board are informed of the responsibility of licentiates to minimize the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from health care provider to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to health care provider, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risks of transmission.
SEC. 7.Section 2878 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:2878.The board may suspend or revoke a license issued under this chapter for any of the following:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:
(1)Incompetence, or gross negligence in carrying out usual nursing functions.
(2)A conviction of practicing medicine without a license in violation of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000), in which event the record of conviction shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction.
(3)The use of advertising relating to nursing which violates Section 17500.
(4)The use of excessive force upon or the mistreatment or abuse of any patient. For the purposes of this paragraph, excessive force means force clearly in excess of that which would normally be applied in similar clinical circumstances.
(5)The failure to maintain confidentiality of patient medical information, except as disclosure is otherwise permitted or required by law.
(6)Failure to report to the commission any act prohibited by this section.
(b)Procuring a certificate by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
(c)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violating of, or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter.
(d)Making or giving any false statement or information in connection with the application for issuance of a license.
(e)Conviction of a crime substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a licensed vocational nurse, in which event the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required under this chapter for the issuance of a license.
(g)Impersonating another practitioner, misrepresenting professional credentials or licensure status, or permitting another person to use the licensees certificate or license.
(h)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of or arranging for a violation of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2220) of Chapter 5.
(i)The commission of any act involving dishonesty, when that action is related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(j)The commission of any act punishable as a sexually related crime, if that act is substantially related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(k)Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines of the board, thereby risking transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from licensee to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensee. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider referencing the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, guidelines, and regulations pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the Medical Board of California, the Podiatric Medical Board of California, the Board of Dental Examiners, and the Board of Registered Nursing, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this subdivision.
(l)The board shall seek to ensure that licentiates and others regulated by the board are informed of the responsibility of licentiates and others to follow infection control guidelines, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases.
SEC. 8.Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:4076.(a)A pharmacist shall not dispense a prescription except in a container that meets the requirements of state and federal law and is correctly labeled with all of the following:
(1)Except when the prescriber or the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6 orders otherwise, either the manufacturers trade name of the drug or the generic name and the name of the manufacturer. Commonly used abbreviations may be used. Preparations containing two or more active ingredients may be identified by the manufacturers trade name or the commonly used name or the principal active ingredients.
(2)The directions for the use of the drug.
(3)The name of the patient or patients.
(4)The name of the prescriber or, if applicable, the name of the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6.
(5)The date of issue.
(6)The name and address of the pharmacy, and prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(7)The strength of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(8)The quantity of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(9)The expiration date of the effectiveness of the drug dispensed.
(10)The condition or purpose for which the drug was prescribed if the condition or purpose is indicated on the prescription.
(11)(A)Commencing January 1, 2006, the physical description of the dispensed medication, including its color, shape, and any identification code that appears on the tablets or capsules, except as follows:
(i)Prescriptions dispensed by a veterinarian.
(ii)An exemption from the requirements of this paragraph shall be granted to a new drug for the first 120 days that the drug is on the market and for the 90 days during which the national reference file has no description on file.
(iii)Dispensed medications for which no physical description exists in a commercially available database.
(B)This paragraph applies to outpatient pharmacies only.
(C)The information required by this paragraph may be printed on an auxiliary label that is affixed to the prescription container.
(D)This paragraph shall not become operative if the board, prior to January 1, 2006, adopts regulations that mandate the same labeling requirements set forth in this paragraph.
(b)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescribed drug by means of a unit dose medication system, as defined by administrative regulation, for a patient in a skilled nursing, intermediate care, or other health care facility, the requirements of this section will be satisfied if the unit dose medication system contains the aforementioned information or the information is otherwise readily available at the time of drug administration.
(c)If a pharmacist dispenses a dangerous drug or device in a facility licensed pursuant to Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, it is not necessary to include on individual unit dose containers for a specific patient, the name of the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6.
(d)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescription drug for use in a facility licensed pursuant to Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, it is not necessary to include the information required in paragraph (11) of subdivision (a) when the prescription drug is administered to a patient by a person licensed under the Medical Practice Act (Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000)), the Nursing Practice Act (Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 2700)), or the Vocational Nursing Practice Act (Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 2840)), who is acting within the scope of practice.
(e)A pharmacist shall use professional judgment to provide a patient with directions for use that enhance the patients understanding of those directions, consistent with the prescribers instructions.
(f)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other law, a pharmacist may dispense a drug prescribed pursuant to Section 120582 of the Health and Safety Code and label the drug without the name of an individual for whom the drug is intended if the prescription includes the words expedited partner therapy or the letters EPT.
(2)A pharmacist who prescribes, dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders EPT, as authorized in subdivision (f), shall not be liable in, and shall not be subject to, a civil, criminal, or administrative action, sanction, or penalty for rendering EPT, if the use of EPT is in compliance with this section, except in cases of intentional misconduct, gross negligence, or wanton or reckless activity.
(3)A pharmacist who provides EPT under this section shall provide written notification that describes the right of an individual who receives EPT to consult with a pharmacist about the medication dispensed and additional information regarding possible drug interactions.
(g)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other law, a pharmacist may, at their discretion, dispense brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the patient as required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), the name of the prescriber as required in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a), or the name and address of the pharmacy as required in paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) if the prescription is labeled with a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(2)A pharmacist who dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion, as authorized in paragraph (1), shall maintain a log with the prescription numbers and the information required in paragraphs (1) to (10), inclusive, of subdivision (a).
(3)Notwithstanding Section 4081, all records maintained under paragraph (2) shall not be open to inspection by law enforcement without a valid, court-issued subpoena.
(4)This subdivision does not prohibit the investigation of an activity that is punishable as a crime under the laws of this state, provided that records maintained under paragraph (2) are not shared with an individual or entity from another state.
(5)A pharmacist shall inform the patient that the pharmacist is dispensing brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion as authorized by this subdivision.
SEC. 9.Section 4318 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:4318.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)The board shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)The board shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
(d)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.SEC. 10.Section 4521 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:4521.The board may suspend or revoke a license issued under this chapter for any of the following reasons:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:
(1)Incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out usual psychiatric technician functions.
(2)A conviction of practicing medicine without a license in violation of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000) of Division 2, the record of conviction being conclusive evidence thereof.
(3)The use of advertising relating to psychiatric technician services which violates Section 17500.
(4)Obtain or possess in violation of law, or prescribe, or, except as directed by a licensed physician and surgeon, dentist, or podiatrist, administer to the licensee or furnish or administer to another, any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code or any dangerous drug as defined in Section 4022.
(5)Use any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code, or any dangerous drug as defined in Section 4022, or alcoholic beverages, to an extent or in a manner dangerous or injurious to the licensee, any other person, or the public or to the extent that the use impairs the ability to conduct with safety to the public the practice authorized by their license.
(6)Be convicted of a criminal offense involving the falsification of records concerning prescription, possession, or consumption of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), in which event the record of the conviction is conclusive evidence of the conviction. The board may inquire into the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime in order to fix the degree of discipline.
(7)Be committed or confined by a court of competent jurisdiction for intemperate use of or addiction to the use of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), in which event the court order of commitment or confinement is prima facie evidence of the commitment or confinement.
(8)Falsify, or make grossly incorrect, grossly inconsistent, or unintelligible entries in any hospital, patient, or other record pertaining to the substances described in paragraph (4).
(b)Procuring a certificate or license by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
(c)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violation of, or conspiring to violate any provision or terms of this chapter.
(d)Giving any false statement or information in connection with an application.
(e)Conviction of any offense substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a psychiatric technician, in which event the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction. The board may inquire into the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime in order to fix the degree of discipline.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required by this chapter.
(g)Impersonating another practitioner, or permitting another person to use the licensees certificate or license.
(h)The use of excessive force upon or the mistreatment or abuse of any patient.
(i)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of or arranging for a violation of any of the provisions of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2220) of Chapter 5 of Division 2.
(j)Failure to maintain confidentiality of patient medical information, except as disclosure is otherwise permitted or required by law.
(k)Failure to report to the commission any act prohibited by this section.
(l)The commission of any act punishable as a sexually related crime, if that act is substantially related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(m)The commission of any act involving dishonesty, when that action is substantially related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(n)Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines, thereby risking transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from licensee to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensee. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, guidelines, and regulations pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the Medical Board of California, the Board of Dental Examiners, and the Board of Registered Nursing, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this section.
(o)The board shall seek to ensure that licentiates and others regulated by the board are informed of the responsibility of licentiates and others to follow infection control guidelines, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases.
SEC. 11.Section 6925 of the Family Code is amended to read:6925.(a)A minor may consent to medical care related to the prevention or treatment of pregnancy.
(b)This section does not authorize a minor to be sterilized without the consent of the minors parent or guardian.
SEC. 12.Section 1220.2 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:1220.2.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensee concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)The department shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)The department shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
(d)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.SEC. 13.Section 1265.12 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:1265.12.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensee concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)The department shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)The department shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
(d)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.SEC. 14.Section 1367.21 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1367.21.(a)A health care service plan contract that covers prescription drug benefits shall not be issued, amended, delivered, or renewed in this state if the plan limits or excludes coverage for a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), provided that all of the following conditions have been met:
(1)The drug is approved by the FDA.
(2)(A)The drug is prescribed by a participating licensed health care professional for the treatment of a life-threatening condition; or
(B)The drug is prescribed by a participating licensed health care professional for the treatment of a chronic and seriously debilitating condition, the drug is medically necessary to treat that condition, and the drug is on the plan formulary. If the drug is not on the plan formulary, the participating subscribers request shall be considered pursuant to the process required by Section 1367.24.
(3)The drug has been recognized for treatment of that condition by any of the following:
(A)The American Hospital Formulary Services Drug Information.
(B)One of the following compendia, if recognized by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as part of an anticancer chemotherapeutic regimen:
(i)The Elsevier Gold Standards Clinical Pharmacology.
(ii)The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Drug and Biologics Compendium.
(iii)The Thomson Micromedex DrugDex.
(C)Two articles from major peer reviewed medical journals that present data supporting the proposed off-label use or uses as generally safe and effective unless there is clear and convincing contradictory evidence presented in a major peer reviewed medical journal.
(b)(1)A health care service plan contract that covers prescription drug benefits shall not be issued, amended, delivered, or renewed in this state if the contract limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to Section 355-1 of Title 21 of the United States Code, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(2)A health care service plan contract that covers prescription drug benefits shall not be issued, amended, delivered, or renewed in this state if the contract limits or excludes include coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone regardless of its FDA approval status, mifepristone, even if the drug has not been approved by the FDA for abortion if the requirements of paragraph (3) have been met, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(3)If name brand or generic mifepristone has not been approved by the FDA for abortion, coverage is required pursuant to paragraph (2) if the drug is a recognized medication for abortion by the World Health Organization (WHO) Model List of Essential Medicines, the WHO abortion care guideline, or the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine Consensus Study Report, or if the state approves its use based on peer-reviewed studies and prior approval of the drug that is no longer in effect.
(c)It shall be the responsibility of the participating prescriber to submit to the plan documentation supporting compliance with the requirements of subdivision (a), if requested by the plan.
(d)Any coverage required by this section shall also include medically necessary services associated with the administration of a drug, subject to the conditions of the contract.
(e)For purposes of this section, life-threatening means either or both of the following:
(1)Diseases or conditions where the likelihood of death is high unless the course of the disease is interrupted.
(2)Diseases or conditions with potentially fatal outcomes, where the end point of clinical intervention is survival.
(f)For purposes of this section, chronic and seriously debilitating means diseases or conditions that require ongoing treatment to maintain remission or prevent deterioration and cause significant long-term morbidity.
(g)The provision of drugs and services when required by this section shall not, in itself, give rise to liability on the part of the plan.
(h)This section does not prohibit the use of a formulary, copayment, technology assessment panel, or similar mechanism as a means for appropriately controlling the utilization of a drug that is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA.
(i)If a plan denies coverage pursuant to this section on the basis that its use is experimental or investigational, that decision is subject to review under Section 1370.4.
(j)Health care service plan contracts for the delivery of Medi-Cal services under the Waxman-Duffy Prepaid Health Plan Act (Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200) of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code) are exempt from the requirements of this section.
SEC. 15.Section 1375.61 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1375.61.(a)A contract issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2024, between a health care service plan and a provider of health care services shall not contain any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, based solely on either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another disciplinary action in another state, if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)A health care service plan shall not discriminate, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)This section does not apply to a civil judgment, a criminal conviction, or a disciplinary action imposed in another state based upon conduct that would subject a provider to claim, charge, or action under the laws of this state.
SEC. 16.Section 111376 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:111376.(a)The department may adopt regulations relating to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion by including brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion within, or excluding brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion from, the requirements of this article, whether or not the inclusion or exclusion of the drug is in accordance with federal law.
(b)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, this article shall not apply to brand name or generic mifepristone in the event of a labeling change or in the absence of its United States Food and Drug Administration approval, approval if it is recommended for use by the World Health Organization and its labeling was true and accurate at the time of manufacture, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(c)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.SEC. 17.Section 111480 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:111480.(a)A drug or device sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device shall be exempt from the labeling requirements of Sections 111335, 111340, 111355, 111360, 111365, 111375, 111380, 111385, 111395, 111415, and 111420, if the drug or device bears a label displaying all of the following:
(1)Except when the prescriber orders otherwise, either the manufacturers trade name of the drug, or the generic name and the name of the manufacturer. Commonly used abbreviations may be used. Preparations containing two or more active ingredients may be identified by the manufacturers trade name or the commonly used name or the principal active ingredients.
(2)The directions for the use of the drug or device.
(3)The name of the patient(s).
(4)The name of the prescriber.
(5)The date of issue.
(6)The name, address of the furnisher, and prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(7)The strength of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(8)The quantity of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(9)The expiration date of the effectiveness of the drug or device if the information is included on the original label of the manufacturer of the drug or device.
(b)Brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device shall be exempt from the labeling requirements of Sections 111335, 111340, 111355, 111360, 111365, 111375, 111380, 111385, 111395, 111415, and 111420, if the label complies with subdivision (g) of Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code.
(c)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescribed drug by means of a unit dose medication system, as defined by administrative regulation, for a patient in a skilled nursing, intermediate care or other health care facility, the requirements of subdivision (a) shall be satisfied if the unit dose medication system contains the information required pursuant to subdivision (a) or the information is otherwise readily available at the time of drug administration.
(d)The exemption in subdivision (a) shall not apply to any drug or device dispensed in the course of the conduct of a business of dispensing drugs or devices pursuant to diagnosis by mail, or to a drug or device dispensed in violation of Section 111470.
SEC. 18.Section 10123.195 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10123.195.(a)A group or individual disability insurance policy issued, delivered, or renewed in this state or certificate of group disability insurance issued, delivered, or renewed in this state pursuant to a master group policy issued, delivered, or renewed in another state that, as a provision of hospital, medical, or surgical services, directly or indirectly covers prescription drugs shall not limit or exclude coverage for a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), provided that all of the following conditions have been met:
(1)The drug is approved by the FDA.
(2)(A)The drug is prescribed by a contracting licensed health care professional for the treatment of a life-threatening condition; or
(B)The drug is prescribed by a contracting licensed health care professional for the treatment of a chronic and seriously debilitating condition, the drug is medically necessary to treat that condition, and the drug is on the insurers formulary, if any.
(3)The drug has been recognized for treatment of that condition by any of the following:
(A)The American Hospital Formulary Services Drug Information.
(B)One of the following compendia, if recognized by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as part of an anticancer chemotherapeutic regimen:
(i)The Elsevier Gold Standards Clinical Pharmacology.
(ii)The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Drug and Biologics Compendium.
(iii)The Thomson Micromedex DrugDex.
(C)Two articles from major peer reviewed medical journals that present data supporting the proposed off-label use or uses as generally safe and effective unless there is clear and convincing contradictory evidence presented in a major peer reviewed medical journal.
(b)(1)A group or individual disability insurance policy issued, delivered, or renewed in this state or certificate of group disability insurance issued, delivered, or renewed in this state pursuant to a master group policy issued, delivered, or renewed in another state that, as a provision of hospital, medical, or surgical services, directly or indirectly covers prescription drugs shall not limit or exclude coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to Section 355-1 of Title 21 of the United States Code, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(2)A group or individual disability insurance policy issued, delivered, or renewed in this state or certificate of group disability insurance issued, delivered, or renewed in this state pursuant to a master group policy issued, delivered, or renewed in another state that, as a provision of hospital, medical, or surgical services, directly or indirectly covers prescription drugs shall not be issued, amended, delivered, or renewed in this state if the policy limits or excludes include coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone regardless of its FDA approval status, mifepristone, even if the drug has not been approved by the FDA for abortion if the requirements of paragraph (3) have been met, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(3)If name brand or generic mifepristone has not been approved by the FDA for abortion, coverage is required pursuant to paragraph (2) if the drug is a recognized medication for abortion by the World Health Organization (WHO) Model List of Essential Medicines, the WHO abortion care guideline, or the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine Consensus Study Report, or if the state approves its use based on peer-reviewed studies and prior approval of the drug that is no longer in effect.
(c)It shall be the responsibility of the contracting prescriber to submit to the insurer documentation supporting compliance with the requirements of subdivision (a), if requested by the insurer.
(d)Any coverage required by this section shall also include medically necessary services associated with the administration of a drug subject to the conditions of the policy.
(e)For purposes of this section, life-threatening means either or both of the following:
(1)Diseases or conditions where the likelihood of death is high unless the course of the disease is interrupted.
(2)Diseases or conditions with potentially fatal outcomes, where the end point of clinical intervention is survival.
(f)For purposes of this section, chronic and seriously debilitating means diseases or conditions that require ongoing treatment to maintain remission or prevent deterioration and cause significant long-term morbidity.
(g)The provision of drugs and services when required by this section shall not, in itself, give rise to liability on the part of the insurer.
(h)This section shall not apply to a policy of disability insurance that covers hospital, medical, or surgical expenses that is issued outside of California to an employer whose principal place of business is located outside of California.
(i)This section does not prohibit the use of a formulary, copayment, technology assessment panel, or similar mechanism as a means for appropriately controlling the utilization of a drug that is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA.
(j)If an insurer denies coverage pursuant to this section on the basis that its use is experimental or investigational, that decision is subject to review under the Independent Medical Review System of Article 3.5 (commencing with Section 10169).
(k)This section is not applicable to vision-only, dental-only, Medicare or Champus supplement, disability income, long-term care, accident-only, specified disease or hospital confinement indemnity insurance.
SEC. 19.Section 10133.641 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10133.641.(a)A contract issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2024, between a health insurer and a provider of health care services shall not contain any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, based solely on either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another professional disciplinary action in another state, if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)A health insurer shall not discriminate, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another professional disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)This section does not apply to a civil judgment, a criminal conviction, or a disciplinary action imposed in another state based upon conduct that would subject a provider to claim, charge, or action under the laws of this state.
(d)The commissioner may enforce this section pursuant to Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 11400) or Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 11500) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. This subdivision does not impair or restrict the commissioners enforcement authority pursuant to another provision of this code or the Administrative Procedure Act.
SEC. 20.Section 1108 of the Penal Code is repealed.SEC. 21.Section 3405 of the Penal Code is amended to read:3405.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by an incarcerated person, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Impermissible restrictions include, but are not limited to, imposing gestational limits inconsistent with state law, unreasonably delaying access to the procedure, or requiring court-ordered transport. Incarcerated persons found to be pregnant and desiring abortions, shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to state and federal law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion after giving informed consent.
(b)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all incarcerated persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 22.Section 4028 of the Penal Code is amended to read:4028.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by a person detained in any local detention facility, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Impermissible restrictions include, but are not limited to, imposing gestational limits inconsistent with state law, unreasonably delaying access to the procedure, or requiring court-ordered transportation. Persons found to be pregnant and desiring abortions shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to state and federal law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion, after providing informed consent.
(b)For the purposes of this section, local detention facility means any city, county, or regional facility used for the confinement for more than 24 hours of a person capable of becoming pregnant.
(c)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all incarcerated persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 23.Section 220 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:220.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by an individual detained in any local juvenile facility, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Individuals found to be pregnant and desiring abortions, shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion.
(b)For the purposes of this section, local juvenile facility means any city, county, or regional facility used for the confinement of juveniles for more than 24 hours.
(c)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all committed persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 24.Section 1773 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:1773.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by an individual committed to the Division of Juvenile Facilities, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Individuals found to be pregnant and desiring abortions shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion.
(b)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all committed persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 25.Section 14043.8 is added to the Welfare and Institutions Code, to read:14043.8.(a)The department shall update the Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirement and procedures for remote service providers who offer reproductive health care services exclusively primarily through telehealth modalities seeking enrollment in the Medi-Cal program to report an administrative location as their service address. That administrative location shall be exempt from the following established place of business requirements listed in Section 51000.60(c) of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations:
(1)Displays regular and permanently posted business hours.
(2)Is identifiable as a medical or health care provider or business by permanently attached signage that identifies the name of the provider or business as shown on the application.
(3)Obtains and maintains liability insurance coverage, which covers premises and operation, in an amount not less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) per claim with a minimum annual aggregate of not less than three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) from an authorized insurer, pursuant to Section 700 of the Insurance Code.
(b)The department shall modify the requirement set forth in Section 51000.4 of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations to permit the use of a cellular telephone as the primary business phone for reproductive health care providers.
(c)A provider subject to this section shall meet current Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirements and standards.
(d)For purposes of this section, reproductive health care services has the same meaning as defined in Section 1798.300 of the Civil Code when those services meet the applicable standard of care and may be appropriately delivered via the telehealth modalities.
SEC. 26.Section 14132.725 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:14132.725.(a)For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Asynchronous store and forward has the same meaning as set forth in subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code. Transmission under asynchronous store and forward also includes asynchronous electronic transmission initiated directly by patients, including through mobile telephone applications.
(2)Border community means border areas adjacent to the State of California where it is customary practice for California residents to use medical resources in adjacent areas outside the state. Under these circumstances, program controls and limitations are the same as for services rendered by health care providers within the state.
(3)Health care provider has the same meaning as set forth in paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code, and shall be either enrolled as a Medi-Cal rendering provider, or a nonphysician medical practitioner affiliated with an enrolled Medi-Cal provider group. Health care provider also includes any provider type designated by the department pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b). The enrolled Medi-Cal provider or provider group for which the health care provider renders services via telehealth shall meet all Medi-Cal requirements and shall be located in the state or a border community.
(4)Health care service plan has the same meaning as set forth in subdivision (f) of Section 1345 of the Health and Safety Code.
(5)Medi-Cal managed care plan has the same meaning as set forth in subdivision (j) of Section 14184.101.
(6)Network provider has the same meaning as set forth in Section 438.2 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
(7)Telehealth has the same meaning as set forth in paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code.
(b)(1)Subject to subdivision (k), in-person, face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient is not required under the Medi-Cal program for covered health care services and provider types designated by the department, when provided by video synchronous interaction, asynchronous store and forward, audio-only synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other permissible virtual communication modalities, when those services and settings meet the applicable standard of care and meet the requirements of the service code being billed.
(2)(A)In implementing this section, the department shall designate and periodically update the covered health care services and provider types, including required licensing and credentialing criteria, as applicable, which may be appropriately delivered via the telehealth modalities described in this subdivision.
(B)Applicable health care services appropriately provided through video synchronous interaction, asynchronous store and forward, audio-only synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other permissible virtual communication modalities are subject to billing, reimbursement, and utilization management policies imposed by the department. Subject to subdivision (k), utilization management protocols adopted by the department pursuant to this section shall be consistent with, and no more restrictive than, those authorized for health care service plans pursuant to Section 1374.13 of the Health and Safety Code.
(c)(1)(A)Pursuant to an effective date designated by the department that is no sooner than January 1, 2024, a Medi-Cal provider furnishing applicable health care services via audio-only synchronous interaction shall also offer those same health care services via video synchronous interaction to preserve beneficiary choice.
(B)(i)The department may provide specific exceptions to the requirement specified in subparagraph (A), based on a Medi-Cal providers access to requisite technologies, which shall be developed in consultation with affected stakeholders and published in departmental guidance.
(ii)In making exceptions to the requirement specified in subparagraph (A), in addition to the provisions in clause (i), the department may also take into consideration the availability of broadband access based on speed standards set by the Federal Communications Commission, pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-104) or other applicable federal law or regulation.
(2)Effective on the date designated by the department pursuant to paragraph (1), a provider furnishing services through video synchronous interaction or audio-only synchronous interaction shall also maintain and follow protocols to do one of the following:
(A)Offer those services via in-person, face-to-face contact.
(B)(i)Arrange for a referral to, and a facilitation of, in-person care that does not require a patient to independently contact a different provider to arrange for that care.
(ii)Clause (i) does not require a provider to schedule an appointment with a different provider on behalf of a patient.
(3)In implementing this subdivision, the department shall consider additional recommendations from affected stakeholders regarding the need to maintain access to in-person services without unduly restricting access to telehealth services.
(4)A health care provider may establish a new patient relationship with a Medi-Cal beneficiary via video synchronous interaction consistent with any requirements imposed by the department.
(5)(A)A health care provider shall not establish a new patient relationship with a Medi-Cal beneficiary via asynchronous store and forward, telephonic (audio-only) synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other virtual communication modalities, except as set forth in paragraph (4) of subdivision (g) of Section 14132.100.
(B)Notwithstanding the prohibition in subparagraph (A), the department may provide for specific exceptions to this prohibition, the department may provide for specific exceptions described in clauses (i) to (iii), inclusive, which shall be developed in consultation with affected stakeholders and published in departmental guidance.
(i)Notwithstanding the prohibition in subparagraph (A), a health care provider may establish a new patient relationship using an audio-only synchronous interaction or asynchronous store and forward when the visit is related to sensitive services, as defined in subdivision (s) of Section 56.05 of the Civil Code, and when established in accordance with department-specific requirements and consistent with federal and state law, regulations, and guidance.
(ii)Notwithstanding the prohibition in subparagraph (A), a health care provider may establish a new patient relationship using an audio-only synchronous interaction when the patient requests an audio-only modality or attests they do not have access to video, and when established in accordance with department-specific requirements and consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance.
(iii)Notwithstanding the prohibition in subparagraph (A), a health care provider may establish a new patient relationship using asynchronous store and forward if the visit is related to reproductive health care services, as defined in subdivision (e) of Section 1798.300 of the Civil Code, if those services meet the applicable standard of care and may be appropriately delivered via the telehealth modalities, the patient requests an asynchronous store and forward modality, and the relationship is established in accordance with department-specific requirements and consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance.
(6)Subject to subdivision (k), the department may establish separate fee schedules for applicable health care services delivered via remote patient monitoring or other permissible virtual communication modalities.
(7)This subdivision does not apply to Medi-Cal covered services delivered by providers via any telehealth modality to eligible inmates in state prisons, county jails, or youth correctional facilities.
(d)In addition to any existing law requiring beneficiary consent to telehealth, including, but not limited to, subdivision (b) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code, all of the following shall be communicated by a health care provider to a Medi-Cal beneficiary, in writing or verbally, on at least one occasion prior to, or concurrent with, initiating the delivery of one or more health care services via telehealth to a Medi-Cal beneficiary: an explanation that beneficiaries have the right to access covered services that may be delivered via telehealth through an in-person, face-to-face visit; an explanation that use of telehealth is voluntary and that consent for the use of telehealth can be withdrawn at any time by the Medi-Cal beneficiary without affecting their ability to access covered Medi-Cal services in the future; an explanation of the availability of Medi-Cal coverage for transportation services to in-person visits when other available resources have been reasonably exhausted; and the potential limitations or risks related to receiving services through telehealth as compared to an in-person visit, to the extent any limitations or risks are identified by the provider.
(1)The provider shall document in the patient record the provision of this information and the patients verbal or written acknowledgment that the information was received.
(2)The department shall develop, in consultation with affected stakeholders, model language for purposes of the communication described in this subdivision.
(3)This subdivision does not apply to Medi-Cal covered services delivered by providers via any telehealth modality to eligible inmates in state prisons, county jails, or youth correctional facilities.
(e)(1)The department shall develop, in consultation with affected stakeholders, an informational notice to be distributed to fee-for-service Medi-Cal beneficiaries and for use by Medi-Cal managed care plans in communicating to their enrollees. Information in the notice shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following:
(A)The availability of Medi-Cal covered telehealth services.
(B)The beneficiarys right to access all medically necessary covered services through in-person, face-to-face visits, and a providers and Medi-Cal managed care plans responsibility to offer or arrange for that in-person care, as applicable.
(C)An explanation that use of telehealth is voluntary and that consent for the use of telehealth can be withdrawn by the Medi-Cal beneficiary at any time without affecting their ability to access covered Medi-Cal services in the future.
(D)An explanation of the availability of Medi-Cal coverage for transportation services to in-person visits when other available resources have been reasonably exhausted.
(E)Notification of the beneficiarys right to make complaints about the offer of telehealth services in lieu of in-person care or about the quality of care delivered through telehealth.
(2)The informational notice shall be translated into threshold languages determined by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 14029.91 and provided in a format that is culturally and linguistically appropriate.
(3)This subdivision does not apply to Medi-Cal covered services delivered by providers via any telehealth modality to eligible inmates in state prisons, county jails, or youth correctional facilities.
(f)(1)Subject to subdivision (k), the department shall reimburse health care providers of applicable health care services delivered via video synchronous interaction, synchronous audio-only modality, or asynchronous store and forward, as applicable, at payment amounts that are not less than the amounts the provider would receive if the services were delivered via in-person, face-to-face contact, so long as the services or settings meet the applicable standard of care and meet the requirements of the service code being billed.
(2)Subject to subdivision (k), for applicable health care services appropriately provided by a network provider via video synchronous interaction, audio-only synchronous interaction modality, or asynchronous store and forward, as applicable, to an enrollee of a Medi-Cal managed care plan, the Medi-Cal managed care plan shall reimburse the network provider at payment amounts that are not less than the amounts the network provider would have received if the services were delivered via in-person, face-to-face contact, unless the Medi-Cal managed care plan and network provider mutually agree to reimbursement in different amounts.
(g)On or before January 1, 2023, the department shall develop a research and evaluation plan that does all of the following:
(1)Proposes strategies to analyze the relationship between telehealth and the following: access to care, access to in-person care, quality of care, and Medi-Cal program costs, utilization, and program integrity.
(2)Examines issues using an equity framework that includes stratification by available geographic and demographic factors, including, but not limited to, race, ethnicity, primary language, age, and gender, to understand inequities and disparities in care.
(3)Prioritizes research and evaluation questions that directly inform Medi-Cal policy.
(h)Applicable health care services provided through asynchronous store and forward, video synchronous interaction, audio-only synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other permissible virtual communication modalities as described in this section shall comply with the privacy and security requirements contained in the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 found in Parts 160 and 164 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the Medicaid State Plan, and any other applicable state and federal statutes and regulations.
(i)Notwithstanding Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, the department may implement, interpret, and make specific this section by means of all-county letters, plan letters, provider bulletins, and similar instructions, without taking any further regulatory action.
(j)Consistent with the requirements of this section and subject to subdivision (k), a PACE organization approved by the department pursuant to Chapter 8.75 (commencing with Section 14591) may use video telehealth to conduct initial assessments and annual reassessments for eligibility for enrollment in the PACE program.
(k)The department shall seek any federal approvals it deems necessary to implement this section. This section shall be implemented only to the extent that any necessary federal approvals are obtained and federal financial participation is available and is not otherwise jeopardized.
(l)This section shall be operative on January 1, 2023, or on the operative date or dates reflected in the applicable federal approvals obtained by the department pursuant to subdivision (k), whichever is later.
(m)This section does not apply to health care services provided via telehealth in an FQHC or RHC visit as described in paragraph (4) of subdivision (g) of Section 14132.100.
SEC. 27.The provisions of this act are severable. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 27.SEC. 28.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)It is the longstanding public policy of this state to promote access to reproductive health care, including abortion care, without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers. Every pregnant individual has the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, a right that is secured by the California Constitution.
(b)Recent federal action and litigation has raised uncertainty about the continued availability nationwide of mifepristone, a drug that has been clinically proven to be part of a safe and effective means of providing medication abortion.
(c)The continued attacks on reproductive freedom across the country require immediate action to protect the right to abortion access, including access to medication abortion, in California.
(d)The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the United States Supreme Court have long recognized states police powers and that direct control of medical practice in the states is beyond the power of federal government (Linder v. United States (1925) 268 U.S. 5, 18).
(e)It is the intent of the Legislature to ensure continued access to medication abortion that has been proven safe and effective for two decades in California for individuals seeking abortion care.
SEC. 2.Section 601 of the Business and Professions Code is repealed.SEC. 3.Section 687 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:687.(a)A healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs shall not be subject to a civil or criminal action or disciplinary or other administrative proceeding solely on the basis that the practitioner prescribed, furnished, ordered, or administered brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to Section 355-1 of Title 21 of the United States Code, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(b)Pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), the authority of a healing arts practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion is the practice of medicine, and the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the ability of a practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion if that action is lawful under the laws of the state, are against the public policy of this state.
SEC. 4.Section 850.3 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:850.3.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against an individual licensed or certified by a healing arts board concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)A healing arts board shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)A healing arts board shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee or health care practitioner subject to this division solely because the licensee or practitioner was convicted or disciplined in another state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
(d)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 5.Section 2519 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:2519.The board may suspend, revoke, or place on probation the license of a midwife for any of the following:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out the usual functions of a licensed midwife.
(2)Conviction of a violation of Section 2052, in which event, the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence thereof.
(3)The use of advertising that is fraudulent or misleading.
(4)Obtaining or possessing in violation of law, or prescribing, or except as directed by a licensed physician and surgeon, dentist, or podiatrist administering to themselves, or furnishing or administering to another, any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code or any dangerous drug as defined in Article 8 (commencing with Section 4210) of Chapter 9 of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code.
(5)The use of any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code, or any dangerous drug as defined in Article 8 (commencing with Section 4210) of Chapter 9 of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code, or alcoholic beverages, to an extent or in a manner dangerous or injurious to themselves, any other person, or the public public, or to the extent that this use impairs their ability to conduct with safety to the public the practice authorized by their license.
(6)Conviction of a criminal offense involving the prescription, consumption, or self-administration of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), or the possession of, or falsification of, a record pertaining to, the substances described in paragraph (4), in which event the record of the conviction is conclusive evidence thereof.
(7)Commitment or confinement by a court of competent jurisdiction for intemperate use of or addiction to the use of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), in which event the court order of commitment or confinement is prima facie evidence of such commitment or confinement.
(8)Falsifying, or making grossly incorrect, grossly inconsistent, or unintelligible entries in any hospital, patient, or other record pertaining to the substances described in subdivision (a).
(b)Procuring a license by fraud or misrepresentation.
(c)Conviction of a crime substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a midwife, as determined by the board.
(d)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violation of, or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter.
(e)Making or giving any false statement or information in connection with the application for issuance of a license.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required under this chapter for the issuance of a license or a certificate.
(g)Impersonating another licensed practitioner, or permitting or allowing another person to use their license or certificate for the purpose of providing midwifery services.
(h)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of of, or arranging for for, a violation of any of the provisions of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2221) of Chapter 5.
(i) Failing to do any of the following when required pursuant to Section 2507:
(1)Consult with a physician and surgeon.
(2)Refer a client to a physician and surgeon.
(3)Transfer a client to a hospital.
SEC. 6.Section 2761 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:2761.The board may take disciplinary action against a certified or licensed nurse or deny an application for a certificate or license for any of the following:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(1)Incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out usual certified or licensed nursing functions.
(2)A conviction of practicing medicine without a license in violation of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000), in which event the record of conviction shall be conclusive evidence thereof.
(3)The use of advertising relating to nursing that violates Section 17500.
(4)Denial of licensure, revocation, suspension, restriction, or any other disciplinary action against a health care professional license or certificate by another state or territory of the United States, by any other government agency, or by another California health care professional licensing board. A certified copy of the decision or judgment shall be conclusive evidence of that action.
(b)Procuring their certificate or license by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
(c)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violating of, or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter or regulations adopted pursuant to it.
(d)Making or giving any false statement or information in connection with the application for issuance of a certificate or license.
(e)Conviction of a felony or of any offense substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a registered nurse, in which event the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence thereof.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required under this chapter for the issuance of a certificate or license.
(g)Impersonating another certified or licensed practitioner, or permitting or allowing another person to use their certificate or license for the purpose of nursing the sick or afflicted.
(h)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of, or arranging for, a violation of any of the provisions of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2220) of Chapter 5.
(i)Holding oneself out to the public or to any practitioner of the healing arts as a nurse practitioner or as meeting the standards established by the board for a nurse practitioner unless meeting the standards established by the board pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 2834) or holding oneself out to the public as being certified by the board as a nurse anesthetist, nurse midwife, clinical nurse specialist, or public health nurse unless the person is at the time certified by the board.
(j)(1)Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines of the board, thereby risking transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from licensed or certified nurse to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensed or certified nurse. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider referencing the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, guidelines, and regulations pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the Medical Board of California, the Podiatric Medical Board of California, the Dental Board of California, and the Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this subdivision.
(2)The board shall seek to ensure that licentiates and others regulated by the board are informed of the responsibility of licentiates to minimize the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from health care provider to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to health care provider, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risks of transmission.
SEC. 7.Section 2878 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:2878.The board may suspend or revoke a license issued under this chapter for any of the following:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:
(1)Incompetence, or gross negligence in carrying out usual nursing functions.
(2)A conviction of practicing medicine without a license in violation of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000), in which event the record of conviction shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction.
(3)The use of advertising relating to nursing which violates Section 17500.
(4)The use of excessive force upon or the mistreatment or abuse of any patient. For the purposes of this paragraph, excessive force means force clearly in excess of that which would normally be applied in similar clinical circumstances.
(5)The failure to maintain confidentiality of patient medical information, except as disclosure is otherwise permitted or required by law.
(6)Failure to report to the commission of any act prohibited by this section.
(b)Procuring a certificate by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
(c)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violating of, or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter.
(d)Making or giving any false statement or information in connection with the application for issuance of a license.
(e)Conviction of a crime substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a licensed vocational nurse, in which event the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required under this chapter for the issuance of a license.
(g)Impersonating another practitioner, misrepresenting professional credentials or licensure status, or permitting another person to use the licensees certificate or license.
(h)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of or arranging for a violation of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2220) of Chapter 5.
(i)The commission of any act involving dishonesty, when that action is related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(j)The commission of any act punishable as a sexually related crime, if that act is substantially related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(k)Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines of the board, thereby risking transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from licensee to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensee. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider referencing the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, guidelines, and regulations pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300), 6300) of Division 5, 5 of the Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the Medical Board of California, the Podiatric Medical Board of California, the Board of Dental Examiners, and the Board of Registered Nursing, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this subdivision.
(l)The board shall seek to ensure that licentiates and others regulated by the board are informed of the responsibility of licentiates and others to follow infection control guidelines, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases.
SEC. 8.Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:4076.(a)A pharmacist shall not dispense a prescription except in a container that meets the requirements of state and federal law and is correctly labeled with all of the following:
(1)Except when the prescriber or the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6 orders otherwise, either the manufacturers trade name of the drug or the generic name and the name of the manufacturer. Commonly used abbreviations may be used. Preparations containing two or more active ingredients may be identified by the manufacturers trade name or the commonly used name or the principal active ingredients.
(2)The directions for the use of the drug.
(3)The name of the patient or patients.
(4)The name of the prescriber or, if applicable, the name of the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6.
(5)The date of issue.
(6)The name and address of the pharmacy, and prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(7)The strength of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(8)The quantity of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(9)The expiration date of the effectiveness of the drug dispensed.
(10)The condition or purpose for which the drug was prescribed if the condition or purpose is indicated on the prescription.
(11)(A)Commencing January 1, 2006, the physical description of the dispensed medication, including its color, shape, and any identification code that appears on the tablets or capsules, except as follows:
(i)Prescriptions dispensed by a veterinarian.
(ii)An exemption from the requirements of this paragraph shall be granted to a new drug for the first 120 days that the drug is on the market and for the 90 days during which the national reference file has no description on file.
(iii)Dispensed medications for which no physical description exists in a commercially available database.
(B)This paragraph applies to outpatient pharmacies only.
(C)The information required by this paragraph may be printed on an auxiliary label that is affixed to the prescription container.
(D)This paragraph shall not become operative if the board, prior to January 1, 2006, adopts regulations that mandate the same labeling requirements set forth in this paragraph.
(b)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescribed drug by means of a unit dose medication system, as defined by administrative regulation, for a patient in a skilled nursing, intermediate care, or other health care facility, the requirements of this section will be satisfied if the unit dose medication system contains the aforementioned information or the information is otherwise readily available at the time of drug administration.
(c)If a pharmacist dispenses a dangerous drug or device in a facility licensed pursuant to Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, it is not necessary to include on individual unit dose containers for a specific patient, the name of the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6.
(d)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescription drug for use in a facility licensed pursuant to Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, it is not necessary to include the information required in paragraph (11) of subdivision (a) when the prescription drug is administered to a patient by a person licensed under the Medical Practice Act (Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000)), the Nursing Practice Act (Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 2700)), or the Vocational Nursing Practice Act (Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 2840)), who is acting within the scope of practice.
(e)A pharmacist shall use professional judgment to provide a patient with directions for use that enhance the patients understanding of those directions, consistent with the prescribers instructions.
(f)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other law, a pharmacist may dispense a drug prescribed pursuant to Section 120582 of the Health and Safety Code and label the drug without the name of an individual for whom the drug is intended if the prescription includes the words expedited partner therapy or the letters EPT.
(2)A pharmacist who prescribes, dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders EPT, as authorized in subdivision (f), shall not be liable in, and shall not be subject to, a civil, criminal, or administrative action, sanction, or penalty for rendering EPT, if the use of EPT is in compliance with this section, except in cases of intentional misconduct, gross negligence, or wanton or reckless activity.
(3)A pharmacist who provides EPT under this section shall provide written notification that describes the right of an individual who receives EPT to consult with a pharmacist about the medication dispensed and additional information regarding possible drug interactions.
(g)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other law, a pharmacist may, at their discretion, dispense brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the patient as required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), the name of the prescriber as required in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) (a), or the name and address of the pharmacy as required in paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) if the prescription is labeled with a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(2)A pharmacist who dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion, as authorized in paragraph (1), shall maintain a log with the prescription numbers and the information required in paragraphs (1) to (10), inclusive, of subdivision (a).
(3)Notwithstanding Section 4081, all records maintained under paragraph (2) shall not be open to inspection by law enforcement without a valid, court-issued subpoena.
(4)This subdivision does not prohibit the investigation of an activity that is punishable as a crime under the laws of this state, provided that records maintained under paragraph (2) are not shared with an individual or entity from another state.
(5)A pharmacist shall inform the patient that the pharmacist is dispensing brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion as authorized by this subdivision.
SEC. 9.Section 4318 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:4318.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)The board shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)The board shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
(d)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 10.Section 4521 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:4521.The board may suspend or revoke a license issued under this chapter for any of the following reasons:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:
(1)Incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out usual psychiatric technician functions.
(2)A conviction of practicing medicine without a license in violation of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000) of Division 2, the record of conviction being conclusive evidence thereof.
(3)The use of advertising relating to psychiatric technician services which violates Section 17500.
(4)Obtain or possess in violation of law, or prescribe, or, except as directed by a licensed physician and surgeon, dentist, or podiatrist, administer to the licensee or furnish or administer to another, any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code or any dangerous drug as defined in Section 4022.
(5)Use any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code, or any dangerous drug as defined in Section 4022, or alcoholic beverages, to an extent or in a manner dangerous or injurious to the licensee, any other person, or the public or to the extent that the use impairs the ability to conduct with safety to the public the practice authorized by their license.
(6)Be convicted of a criminal offense involving the falsification of records concerning prescription, possession, or consumption of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), in which event the record of the conviction is conclusive evidence of the conviction. The board may inquire into the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime in order to fix the degree of discipline.
(7)Be committed or confined by a court of competent jurisdiction for intemperate use of or addiction to the use of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), in which event the court order of commitment or confinement is prima facie evidence of the commitment or confinement.
(8)Falsify, or make grossly incorrect, grossly inconsistent, or unintelligible entries in any hospital, patient, or other record pertaining to the substances described in paragraph (4).
(b)Procuring a certificate or license by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
(c)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violation of, or conspiring to violate any provision or terms of this chapter.
(d)Giving any false statement or information in connection with an application.
(e)Conviction of any offense substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a psychiatric technician, in which event the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction. The board may inquire into the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime in order to fix the degree of discipline.
(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required by this chapter.
(g)Impersonating another practitioner, or permitting another person to use the licensees certificate or license.
(h)The use of excessive force upon or the mistreatment or abuse of any patient.
(i)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of or arranging for a violation of any of the provisions of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2220) of Chapter 5 of Division 2.
(j)Failure to maintain confidentiality of patient medical information, except as disclosure is otherwise permitted or required by law.
(k)Failure to report to the commission of any act prohibited by this section.
(l)The commission of any act punishable as a sexually related crime, if that act is substantially related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(m)The commission of any act involving dishonesty, when that action is substantially related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(n)Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines, thereby risking transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from licensee to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensee. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, guidelines, and regulations pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the Medical Board of California, the Board of Dental Examiners, and the Board of Registered Nursing, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this section.
(o)The board shall seek to ensure that licentiates and others regulated by the board are informed of the responsibility of licentiates and others to follow infection control guidelines, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases.
SEC. 11.Section 6925 of the Family Code is amended to read:6925.(a)A minor may consent to medical care related to the prevention or treatment of pregnancy.
(b)This section does not authorize a minor to be sterilized without the consent of the minors parent or guardian.
SEC. 12.Section 1220.2 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:1220.2.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensee concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)The department shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)The department shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
(d)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 13.Section 1265.12 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:1265.12.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensee concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)The department shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)The department shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
(d)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 14.Section 1367.21 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1367.21.(a)A health care service plan contract that covers prescription drug benefits shall not be issued, amended, delivered, or renewed in this state if the plan limits or excludes coverage for a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), provided that all of the following conditions have been met:
(1)The drug is approved by the FDA.
(2)(A)The drug is prescribed by a participating licensed health care professional for the treatment of a life-threatening condition; or
(B)The drug is prescribed by a participating licensed health care professional for the treatment of a chronic and seriously debilitating condition, the drug is medically necessary to treat that condition, and the drug is on the plan formulary. If the drug is not on the plan formulary, the participating subscribers request shall be considered pursuant to the process required by Section 1367.24.
(3)The drug has been recognized for treatment of that condition by any of the following:
(A)The American Hospital Formulary Services Drug Information.
(B)One of the following compendia, if recognized by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as part of an anticancer chemotherapeutic regimen:
(i)The Elsevier Gold Standards Clinical Pharmacology.
(ii)The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Drug and Biologics Compendium.
(iii)The Thomson Micromedex DrugDex.
(C)Two articles from major peer reviewed medical journals that present data supporting the proposed off-label use or uses as generally safe and effective unless there is clear and convincing contradictory evidence presented in a major peer reviewed medical journal.
(b)(1)A health care service plan contract that covers prescription drug benefits shall not be issued, amended, delivered, or renewed in this state if the contract limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to Section 355-1 of Title 21 of the United States Code, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(2)A health care service plan contract that covers prescription drug benefits shall not be issued, amended, delivered, or renewed in this state if the contract limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone regardless of its FDA approval status, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(c)It shall be the responsibility of the participating prescriber to submit to the plan documentation supporting compliance with the requirements of subdivision (a), if requested by the plan.
(d)Any coverage required by this section shall also include medically necessary services associated with the administration of a drug, subject to the conditions of the contract.
(e)For purposes of this section, life-threatening means either or both of the following:
(1)Diseases or conditions where the likelihood of death is high unless the course of the disease is interrupted.
(2)Diseases or conditions with potentially fatal outcomes, where the end point of clinical intervention is survival.
(f)For purposes of this section, chronic and seriously debilitating means diseases or conditions that require ongoing treatment to maintain remission or prevent deterioration and cause significant long-term morbidity.
(g)The provision of drugs and services when required by this section shall not, in itself, give rise to liability on the part of the plan.
(h)This section does not prohibit the use of a formulary, copayment, technology assessment panel, or similar mechanism as a means for appropriately controlling the utilization of a drug that is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA.
(i)If a plan denies coverage pursuant to this section on the basis that its use is experimental or investigational, that decision is subject to review under Section 1370.4.
(j)Health care service plan contracts for the delivery of Medi-Cal services under the Waxman-Duffy Prepaid Health Plan Act (Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200) of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code) are exempt from the requirements of this section.
SEC. 15.Section 1375.61 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1375.61.(a)A contract issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2024, between a health care service plan and a provider of health care services shall not contain any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, based solely on either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another disciplinary action in another state, if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)A health care service plan shall not discriminate, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)This section does not apply to a civil judgment, a criminal conviction, or a disciplinary action imposed in another state based upon conduct that would subject a provider to claim, charge, or action under the laws of this state.
SEC. 16.Section 111376 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:111376.(a)The department may adopt regulations relating to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion by including brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion within, or excluding brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion from, the requirements of this article, whether or not the inclusion or exclusion of the drug is in accordance with federal law.
(b)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, this article shall not apply to brand name or generic mifepristone in the event of a labeling change or in the absence of its United States Food and Drug Administration approval, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(c)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 17.Section 111480 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:111480.(a)A drug or device sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device shall be exempt from the labeling requirements of Sections 111335, 111340, 111355, 111360, 111365, 111375, 111380, 111385, 111395, 111415, and 111420, if the drug or device bears a label displaying all of the following:
(1)Except where when the prescriber orders otherwise, either the manufacturers trade name of the drug, or the generic name and the name of the manufacturer. Commonly used abbreviations may be used. Preparations containing two or more active ingredients may be identified by the manufacturers trade name or the commonly used name or the principal active ingredients.
(2)The directions for the use of the drug or device.
(3)The name of the patient(s).
(4)The name of the prescriber.
(5)The date of issue.
(6)The name, address of the furnisher, and prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(7)The strength of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(8)The quantity of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(9)The expiration date of the effectiveness of the drug or device if the information is included on the original label of the manufacturer of the drug or device.
(b)Brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device shall be exempt from the labeling requirements of Sections 111335, 111340, 111355, 111360, 111365, 111375, 111380, 111385, 111395, 111415, and 111420, if the label complies with subdivision (g) of Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code.
(c)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescribed drug by means of a unit dose medication system, as defined by administrative regulation, for a patient in a skilled nursing, intermediate care or other health care facility, the requirements of subdivision (a) shall be satisfied if the unit dose medication system contains the information required pursuant to subdivision (a) or the information is otherwise readily available at the time of drug administration.
(d)The exemption in subdivision (a) shall not apply to any drug or device dispensed in the course of the conduct of a business of dispensing drugs or devices pursuant to diagnosis by mail, or to a drug or device dispensed in violation of Section 111470.
SEC. 18.Section 10123.195 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10123.195.(a)A group or individual disability insurance policy issued, delivered, or renewed in this state or certificate of group disability insurance issued, delivered, or renewed in this state pursuant to a master group policy issued, delivered, or renewed in another state that, as a provision of hospital, medical, or surgical services, directly or indirectly covers prescription drugs shall not limit or exclude coverage for a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), provided that all of the following conditions have been met:
(1)The drug is approved by the FDA.
(2)(A)The drug is prescribed by a contracting licensed health care professional for the treatment of a life-threatening condition; or
(B)The drug is prescribed by a contracting licensed health care professional for the treatment of a chronic and seriously debilitating condition, the drug is medically necessary to treat that condition, and the drug is on the insurers formulary, if any.
(3)The drug has been recognized for treatment of that condition by any of the following:
(A)The American Hospital Formulary Services Drug Information.
(B)One of the following compendia, if recognized by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as part of an anticancer chemotherapeutic regimen:
(i)The Elsevier Gold Standards Clinical Pharmacology.
(ii)The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Drug and Biologics Compendium.
(iii)The Thomson Micromedex DrugDex.
(C)Two articles from major peer reviewed medical journals that present data supporting the proposed off-label use or uses as generally safe and effective unless there is clear and convincing contradictory evidence presented in a major peer reviewed medical journal.
(b)(1)A group or individual disability insurance policy issued, delivered, or renewed in this state or certificate of group disability insurance issued, delivered, or renewed in this state pursuant to a master group policy issued, delivered, or renewed in another state that, as a provision of hospital, medical, or surgical services, directly or indirectly covers prescription drugs shall not limit or exclude coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to Section 355-1 of Title 21 of the United States Code, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(2)A group or individual disability insurance policy issued, delivered, or renewed in this state or certificate of group disability insurance issued, delivered, or renewed in this state pursuant to a master group policy issued, delivered, or renewed in another state that, as a provision of hospital, medical, or surgical services, directly or indirectly covers prescription drugs shall not be issued, amended, delivered, or renewed in this state if the policy limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone regardless of its FDA approval status, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(c)It shall be the responsibility of the contracting prescriber to submit to the insurer documentation supporting compliance with the requirements of subdivision (a), if requested by the insurer.
(d)Any coverage required by this section shall also include medically necessary services associated with the administration of a drug subject to the conditions of the policy.
(e)For purposes of this section, life-threatening means either or both of the following:
(1)Diseases or conditions where the likelihood of death is high unless the course of the disease is interrupted.
(2)Diseases or conditions with potentially fatal outcomes, where the end point of clinical intervention is survival.
(f)For purposes of this section, chronic and seriously debilitating means diseases or conditions that require ongoing treatment to maintain remission or prevent deterioration and cause significant long-term morbidity.
(g)The provision of drugs and services when required by this section shall not, in itself, give rise to liability on the part of the insurer.
(h)This section shall not apply to a policy of disability insurance that covers hospital, medical, or surgical expenses that is issued outside of California to an employer whose principal place of business is located outside of California.
(i)This section does not prohibit the use of a formulary, copayment, technology assessment panel, or similar mechanism as a means for appropriately controlling the utilization of a drug that is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA.
(j)If an insurer denies coverage pursuant to this section on the basis that its use is experimental or investigational, that decision is subject to review under the Independent Medical Review System of Article 3.5 (commencing with Section 10169).
(k)This section is not applicable to vision-only, dental-only, Medicare or Champus supplement, disability income, long-term care, accident-only, specified disease or hospital confinement indemnity insurance.
SEC. 19.Section 10133.641 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10133.641.(a)A contract issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2024, between a health insurer and a provider of health care services shall not contain any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, based solely on either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another professional disciplinary action in another state, if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)A health insurer shall not discriminate, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another professional disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)This section does not apply to a civil judgment, a criminal conviction, or a disciplinary action imposed in another state based upon conduct that would subject a provider to claim, charge, or action under the laws of this state.
(d)The commissioner may enforce this section pursuant to Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 11400) or Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 11500) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. This subdivision does not impair or restrict the commissioners enforcement authority pursuant to another provision of this code or the Administrative Procedure Act.
SEC. 20.Section 1108 of the Penal Code is repealed.SEC. 21.Section 3405 of the Penal Code is amended to read:3405.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by an incarcerated person, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Impermissible restrictions include, but are not limited to, imposing gestational limits inconsistent with state law, unreasonably delaying access to the procedure, or requiring court-ordered transport. Incarcerated persons found to be pregnant and desiring abortions, shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to state and federal law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion after giving informed consent.
(b)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all incarcerated persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 22.Section 4028 of the Penal Code is amended to read:4028.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by a person detained in any local detention facility, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Impermissible restrictions include, but are not limited to, imposing gestational limits inconsistent with state law, unreasonably delaying access to the procedure, or requiring court-ordered transportation. Persons found to be pregnant and desiring abortions shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to state and federal law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion, after providing informed consent.
(b)For the purposes of this section, local detention facility means any city, county, or regional facility used for the confinement for more than 24 hours of a person capable of becoming pregnant.
(c)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all incarcerated persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 23.Section 220 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:220.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by an individual detained in any local juvenile facility, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Individuals found to be pregnant and desiring abortions, shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion.
(b)For the purposes of this section, local juvenile facility means any city, county, or regional facility used for the confinement of juveniles for more than 24 hours.
(c)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all committed persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 24.Section 1773 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:1773.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by an individual committed to the Division of Juvenile Facilities, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in those provisions. Individuals found to be pregnant and desiring abortions shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion.
(b)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all committed persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 25.Section 14043.8 is added to the Welfare and Institutions Code, to read:14043.8.(a)The department shall update the Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirement and procedures for remote service providers who offer reproductive health care services exclusively through telehealth modalities seeking enrollment in the Medi-Cal program to report an administrative location as their service address. That administrative location shall be exempt from the following established place of business requirements listed in Section 51000.60(c) of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations:
(1)Displays regular and permanently posted business hours.
(2)Is identifiable as a medical or health care provider or business by permanently attached signage that identifies the name of the provider or business as shown on the application.
(3)Obtains and maintains liability insurance coverage, which covers premises and operation, in an amount not less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) per claim with a minimum annual aggregate of not less than three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) from an authorized insurer, pursuant to Section 700 of the Insurance Code.
(b)The department shall modify the requirement set forth in Section 51000.4 of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations to permit the use of a cellular telephone as the primary business phone for reproductive health care providers.
(c)A provider subject to this section shall meet current Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirements and standards.
(d)For purposes of this section, reproductive health care services has the same meaning as defined in Section 1798.300 of the Civil Code when those services meet the applicable standard of care and may be appropriately delivered via the telehealth modalities.
SEC. 26.Section 14132.725 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:14132.725.(a)For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Asynchronous store and forward has the same meaning as set forth in subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code. Transmission under asynchronous store and forward also includes asynchronous electronic transmission initiated directly by patients, including through mobile telephone applications.
(2)Border community means border areas adjacent to the State of California where it is customary practice for California residents to use medical resources in adjacent areas outside the state. Under these circumstances, program controls and limitations are the same as for services rendered by health care providers within the state.
(3)Health care provider has the same meaning as set forth in paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code, and shall be either enrolled as a Medi-Cal rendering provider, or a nonphysician medical practitioner affiliated with an enrolled Medi-Cal provider group. Health care provider also includes any provider type designated by the department pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b). The enrolled Medi-Cal provider or provider group for which the health care provider renders services via telehealth shall meet all Medi-Cal requirements and shall be located in the state or a border community.
(4)Health care service plan has the same meaning as set forth in subdivision (f) of Section 1345 of the Health and Safety Code.
(5)Medi-Cal managed care plan has the same meaning as set forth in subdivision (j) of Section 14184.101.
(6)Network provider has the same meaning as set forth in Section 438.2 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
(7)Telehealth has the same meaning as set forth in paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code.
(b)(1)Subject to subdivision (k), in-person, face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient is not required under the Medi-Cal program for covered health care services and provider types designated by the department, when provided by video synchronous interaction, asynchronous store and forward, audio-only synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other permissible virtual communication modalities, when those services and settings meet the applicable standard of care and meet the requirements of the service code being billed.
(2)(A)In implementing this section, the department shall designate and periodically update the covered health care services and provider types, including required licensing and credentialing criteria, as applicable, which may be appropriately delivered via the telehealth modalities described in this subdivision.
(B)Applicable health care services appropriately provided through video synchronous interaction, asynchronous store and forward, audio-only synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other permissible virtual communication modalities are subject to billing, reimbursement, and utilization management policies imposed by the department. Subject to subdivision (k), utilization management protocols adopted by the department pursuant to this section shall be consistent with, and no more restrictive than, those authorized for health care service plans pursuant to Section 1374.13 of the Health and Safety Code.
(c)(1)(A)Pursuant to an effective date designated by the department that is no sooner than January 1, 2024, a Medi-Cal provider furnishing applicable health care services via audio-only synchronous interaction shall also offer those same health care services via video synchronous interaction to preserve beneficiary choice.
(B)(i)The department may provide specific exceptions to the requirement specified in subparagraph (A), based on a Medi-Cal providers access to requisite technologies, which shall be developed in consultation with affected stakeholders and published in departmental guidance.
(ii)In making exceptions to the requirement specified in subparagraph (A), in addition to the provisions in clause (i), the department may also take into consideration the availability of broadband access based on speed standards set by the Federal Communications Commission, pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-104) or other applicable federal law or regulation.
(2)Effective on the date designated by the department pursuant to paragraph (1), a provider furnishing services through video synchronous interaction or audio-only synchronous interaction shall also maintain and follow protocols to do one of the following:
(A)Offer those services via in-person, face-to-face contact.
(B)(i)Arrange for a referral to, and a facilitation of, in-person care that does not require a patient to independently contact a different provider to arrange for that care.
(ii)Clause (i) does not require a provider to schedule an appointment with a different provider on behalf of a patient.
(3)In implementing this subdivision, the department shall consider additional recommendations from affected stakeholders regarding the need to maintain access to in-person services without unduly restricting access to telehealth services.
(4)A health care provider may establish a new patient relationship with a Medi-Cal beneficiary via video synchronous interaction consistent with any requirements imposed by the department.
(5)(A)A health care provider shall not establish a new patient relationship with a Medi-Cal beneficiary via asynchronous store and forward, telephonic (audio-only) synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other virtual communication modalities, except as set forth in paragraph (4) of subdivision (g) of Section 14132.100.
(B)Notwithstanding the prohibition in subparagraph (A), the department may provide for specific exceptions to this prohibition, the department may provide for specific exceptions described in clauses (i) to (iii), inclusive, which shall be developed in consultation with affected stakeholders and published in departmental guidance.
(i)Notwithstanding the prohibition in subparagraph (A), a health care provider may establish a new patient relationship using an audio-only synchronous interaction or asynchronous store and forward when the visit is related to sensitive services, as defined in subdivision (s) of Section 56.05 of the Civil Code, and when established in accordance with department-specific requirements and consistent with federal and state law, regulations, and guidance.
(ii)Notwithstanding the prohibition in subparagraph (A), a health care provider may establish a new patient relationship using an audio-only synchronous interaction when the patient requests an audio-only modality or attests they do not have access to video, and when established in accordance with department-specific requirements and consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance.
(iii)Notwithstanding the prohibition in subparagraph (A), a health care provider may establish a new patient relationship using asynchronous store and forward if the visit is related to reproductive health care services, as defined in subdivision (e) of Section 1798.300 of the Civil Code, if those services meet the applicable standard of care and may be appropriately delivered via the telehealth modalities, the patient requests an asynchronous store and forward modality, and the relationship is established in accordance with department-specific requirements and consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance.
(6)Subject to subdivision (k), the department may establish separate fee schedules for applicable health care services delivered via remote patient monitoring or other permissible virtual communication modalities.
(7)This subdivision does not apply to Medi-Cal covered services delivered by providers via any telehealth modality to eligible inmates in state prisons, county jails, or youth correctional facilities.
(d)In addition to any existing law requiring beneficiary consent to telehealth, including, but not limited to, subdivision (b) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code, all of the following shall be communicated by a health care provider to a Medi-Cal beneficiary, in writing or verbally, on at least one occasion prior to, or concurrent with, initiating the delivery of one or more health care services via telehealth to a Medi-Cal beneficiary: an explanation that beneficiaries have the right to access covered services that may be delivered via telehealth through an in-person, face-to-face visit; an explanation that use of telehealth is voluntary and that consent for the use of telehealth can be withdrawn at any time by the Medi-Cal beneficiary without affecting their ability to access covered Medi-Cal services in the future; an explanation of the availability of Medi-Cal coverage for transportation services to in-person visits when other available resources have been reasonably exhausted; and the potential limitations or risks related to receiving services through telehealth as compared to an in-person visit, to the extent any limitations or risks are identified by the provider.
(1)The provider shall document in the patient record the provision of this information and the patients verbal or written acknowledgment that the information was received.
(2)The department shall develop, in consultation with affected stakeholders, model language for purposes of the communication described in this subdivision.
(3)This subdivision does not apply to Medi-Cal covered services delivered by providers via any telehealth modality to eligible inmates in state prisons, county jails, or youth correctional facilities.
(e)(1)The department shall develop, in consultation with affected stakeholders, an informational notice to be distributed to fee-for-service Medi-Cal beneficiaries and for use by Medi-Cal managed care plans in communicating to their enrollees. Information in the notice shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following:
(A)The availability of Medi-Cal covered telehealth services.
(B)The beneficiarys right to access all medically necessary covered services through in-person, face-to-face visits, and a providers and Medi-Cal managed care plans responsibility to offer or arrange for that in-person care, as applicable.
(C)An explanation that use of telehealth is voluntary and that consent for the use of telehealth can be withdrawn by the Medi-Cal beneficiary at any time without affecting their ability to access covered Medi-Cal services in the future.
(D)An explanation of the availability of Medi-Cal coverage for transportation services to in-person visits when other available resources have been reasonably exhausted.
(E)Notification of the beneficiarys right to make complaints about the offer of telehealth services in lieu of in-person care or about the quality of care delivered through telehealth.
(2)The informational notice shall be translated into threshold languages determined by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 14029.91 and provided in a format that is culturally and linguistically appropriate.
(3)This subdivision does not apply to Medi-Cal covered services delivered by providers via any telehealth modality to eligible inmates in state prisons, county jails, or youth correctional facilities.
(f)(1)Subject to subdivision (k), the department shall reimburse health care providers of applicable health care services delivered via video synchronous interaction, synchronous audio-only modality, or asynchronous store and forward, as applicable, at payment amounts that are not less than the amounts the provider would receive if the services were delivered via in-person, face-to-face contact, so long as the services or settings meet the applicable standard of care and meet the requirements of the service code being billed.
(2)Subject to subdivision (k), for applicable health care services appropriately provided by a network provider via video synchronous interaction, audio-only synchronous interaction modality, or asynchronous store and forward, as applicable, to an enrollee of a Medi-Cal managed care plan, the Medi-Cal managed care plan shall reimburse the network provider at payment amounts that are not less than the amounts the network provider would have received if the services were delivered via in-person, face-to-face contact, unless the Medi-Cal managed care plan and network provider mutually agree to reimbursement in different amounts.
(g)On or before January 1, 2023, the department shall develop a research and evaluation plan that does all of the following:
(1)Proposes strategies to analyze the relationship between telehealth and the following: access to care, access to in-person care, quality of care, and Medi-Cal program costs, utilization, and program integrity.
(2)Examines issues using an equity framework that includes stratification by available geographic and demographic factors, including, but not limited to, race, ethnicity, primary language, age, and gender, to understand inequities and disparities in care.
(3)Prioritizes research and evaluation questions that directly inform Medi-Cal policy.
(h)Applicable health care services provided through asynchronous store and forward, video synchronous interaction, audio-only synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other permissible virtual communication modalities as described in this section shall comply with the privacy and security requirements contained in the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 found in Parts 160 and 164 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the Medicaid State Plan, and any other applicable state and federal statutes and regulations.
(i)Notwithstanding Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, the department may implement, interpret, and make specific this section by means of all-county letters, plan letters, provider bulletins, and similar instructions, without taking any further regulatory action.
(j)Consistent with the requirements of this section and subject to subdivision (k), a PACE organization approved by the department pursuant to Chapter 8.75 (commencing with Section 14591) may use video telehealth to conduct initial assessments and annual reassessments for eligibility for enrollment in the PACE program.
(k)The department shall seek any federal approvals it deems necessary to implement this section. This section shall be implemented only to the extent that any necessary federal approvals are obtained and federal financial participation is available and is not otherwise jeopardized.
(l)This section shall be operative on January 1, 2023, or on the operative date or dates reflected in the applicable federal approvals obtained by the department pursuant to subdivision (k), whichever is later.
(m)This section does not apply to health care services provided via telehealth in an FQHC or RHC visit as described in paragraph (4) of subdivision (g) of Section 14132.100.
SEC. 27.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)It is the longstanding public policy of this state to promote access to reproductive health care, including abortion care, without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers. Every pregnant individual has the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, a right that is secured by the California Constitution.
(b)Recent federal action and litigation has raised uncertainty about the continued availability nationwide of mifepristone, a drug that has been clinically proven to be part of a safe and effective means of providing medication abortion.
(c)The continued attacks on reproductive freedom across the country require immediate action to protect the right to abortion access, including access to medication abortion, in California.
(d)The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the United States Supreme Court have long recognized states police powers and that direct control of medical practice in the states is beyond the power of federal government (Linder v. United States (1925) 268 U.S. 5, 18).
(e)It is the intent of the Legislature to ensure continued access to medication abortion that has been proven safe and effective for two decades in California for individuals seeking abortion care.
SEC. 2.Section 601 of the Business and Professions Code is repealed.601.Every person who willfully writes, composes or publishes any notice or advertisement of any medicine or means for producing or facilitating a miscarriage or abortion, or who offers his services by any notice, advertisement, or otherwise, to assist in the accomplishment of any such purpose is guilty of a felony and shall be punished as provided in the Penal Code.SEC. 3.Section 687 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:687.(a)A healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs shall not be subject to a civil or criminal action or disciplinary or other administrative proceeding solely on the basis that the practitioner prescribed, furnished, ordered, or administered brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to Section 355-1 of Title 21 of the United States Code, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(b)Pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), the authority of a healing arts practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion is the practice of medicine, and the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the ability of a practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion if that action is lawful under the laws of the state, are against the public policy of this state.
SEC. 4.Section 850.3 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:850.3.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against an individual licensed or certified by a healing arts board concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)A healing arts board shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)A healing arts board shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee or health care practitioner subject to this division solely because the licensee or practitioner was convicted or disciplined in another state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
(d)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 5.Section 2519 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:2519.The board may suspend, revoke, or place on probation the license of a midwife for any of the following:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1)Incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out the usual functions of a licensed midwife.
(2)Conviction of a violation of Section 2052, in which event, the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence thereof.
(3)The use of advertising that is fraudulent or misleading.
(4)Obtaining or possessing in violation of law, or prescribing, or except as directed by a licensed physician and surgeon, dentist, or podiatrist administering to himself or herself, themselves, or furnishing or administering to another, any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code or any dangerous drug as defined in Article 8 (commencing with Section 4210) of Chapter 9 of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code.
(5)The use of any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code, or any dangerous drug as defined in Article 8 (commencing with Section 4210) of Chapter 9 of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code, or alcoholic beverages, to an extent or in a manner dangerous or injurious to himself or herself, themselves, any other person, or the public or to the extent that this use impairs his or her their ability to conduct with safety to the public the practice authorized by his or her their license.
(6)Conviction of a criminal offense involving the prescription, consumption, or self-administration of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), or the possession of, or falsification of, a record pertaining to, the substances described in paragraph (4), in which event the record of the conviction is conclusive evidence thereof.
(7)Commitment or confinement by a court of competent jurisdiction for intemperate use of or addiction to the use of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), in which event the court order of commitment or confinement is prima facie evidence of such commitment or confinement.
(8)Falsifying, or making grossly incorrect, grossly inconsistent, or unintelligible entries in any hospital, patient, or other record pertaining to the substances described in subdivision (a).
(b)Procuring a license by fraud or misrepresentation.
(c)Conviction of a crime substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a midwife, as determined by the board.
(d)Procuring, aiding, abetting, attempting, agreeing to procure, offering to procure, or assisting at, a criminal abortion. (e)(d)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violation of, or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter.
(f)(e)Making or giving any false statement or information in connection with the application for issuance of a license.
(g)(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required under this chapter for the issuance of a license or a certificate.
(h)(g)Impersonating another licensed practitioner, or permitting or allowing another person to use his or her their license or certificate for the purpose of providing midwifery services.
(i)(h)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of or arranging for a violation of any of the provisions of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2221) of Chapter 5.
(j)(i) Failing to do any of the following when required pursuant to Section 2507:
(1) Consult with a physician and surgeon.
(2) Refer a client to a physician and surgeon.
(3) Transfer a client to a hospital.
SEC. 6.Section 2761 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:2761.The board may take disciplinary action against a certified or licensed nurse or deny an application for a certificate or license for any of the following:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(1)Incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out usual certified or licensed nursing functions.
(2)A conviction of practicing medicine without a license in violation of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000), in which event the record of conviction shall be conclusive evidence thereof.
(3)The use of advertising relating to nursing that violates Section 17500.
(4)Denial of licensure, revocation, suspension, restriction, or any other disciplinary action against a health care professional license or certificate by another state or territory of the United States, by any other government agency, or by another California health care professional licensing board. A certified copy of the decision or judgment shall be conclusive evidence of that action.
(b)Procuring their certificate or license by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
(c)Procuring, or aiding, or abetting, or attempting, or agreeing, or offering to procure or assist at a criminal abortion. (d)(c)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violating of, or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter or regulations adopted pursuant to it.
(e)(d)Making or giving any false statement or information in connection with the application for issuance of a certificate or license.
(f)(e)Conviction of a felony or of any offense substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a registered nurse, in which event the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence thereof.
(g)(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required under this chapter for the issuance of a certificate or license.
(h)(g)Impersonating another certified or licensed practitioner, or permitting or allowing another person to use their certificate or license for the purpose of nursing the sick or afflicted.
(i)(h)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of, or arranging for, a violation of any of the provisions of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2220) of Chapter 5.
(j)(i)Holding oneself out to the public or to any practitioner of the healing arts as a nurse practitioner or as meeting the standards established by the board for a nurse practitioner unless meeting the standards established by the board pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 2834) or holding oneself out to the public as being certified by the board as a nurse anesthetist, nurse midwife, clinical nurse specialist, or public health nurse unless the person is at the time certified by the board.
(k)(j)(1)Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines of the board, thereby risking transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from licensed or certified nurse to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensed or certified nurse. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider referencing the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, guidelines, and regulations pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the Medical Board of California, the Podiatric Medical Board of California, the Dental Board of California, and the Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this subdivision.
(2)The board shall seek to ensure that licentiates and others regulated by the board are informed of the responsibility of licentiates to minimize the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from health care provider to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to health care provider, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risks of transmission.
SEC. 7.Section 2878 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:2878.The board may suspend or revoke a license issued under this chapter for any of the following:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(1)Incompetence, or gross negligence in carrying out usual nursing functions.
(2)A conviction of practicing medicine without a license in violation of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000), in which event the record of conviction shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction.
(3)The use of advertising relating to nursing which violates Section 17500.
(4)The use of excessive force upon or the mistreatment or abuse of any patient. For the purposes of this paragraph, excessive force means force clearly in excess of that which would normally be applied in similar clinical circumstances.
(5)The failure to maintain confidentiality of patient medical information, except as disclosure is otherwise permitted or required by law.
(6)Failure to report the commission of any act prohibited by this section.
(b)Procuring a certificate by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
(c)Procuring, aiding, abetting, attempting, or agreeing or offering to procure or assist at, a criminal abortion.(d)(c)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violating of, or conspiring to violate any provision or term of this chapter.
(e)(d)Making or giving any false statement or information in connection with the application for issuance of a license.
(f)(e)Conviction of a crime substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a licensed vocational nurse, in which event the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction.
(g)(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required under this chapter for the issuance of a license.
(h)(g)Impersonating another practitioner, misrepresenting professional credentials or licensure status, or permitting another person to use the licensees certificate or license.
(i)(h)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of or arranging for a violation of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2220) of Chapter 5.
(j)(i)The commission of any act involving dishonesty, when that action is related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(k)(j)The commission of any act punishable as a sexually related crime, if that act is substantially related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(l)(k)Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines of the board, thereby risking transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from licensee to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensee. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider referencing the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, guidelines, and regulations pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300), Division 5, Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the Medical Board of California, the Podiatric Medical Board of California, the Board of Dental Examiners, and the Board of Registered Nursing, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this subdivision.
The(l)The board shall seek to ensure that licentiates and others regulated by the board are informed of the responsibility of licentiates and others to follow infection control guidelines, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases.
SEC. 8.Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:4076.(a)A pharmacist shall not dispense a prescription except in a container that meets the requirements of state and federal law and is correctly labeled with all of the following:
(1)Except when the prescriber or the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6 orders otherwise, either the manufacturers trade name of the drug or the generic name and the name of the manufacturer. Commonly used abbreviations may be used. Preparations containing two or more active ingredients may be identified by the manufacturers trade name or the commonly used name or the principal active ingredients.
(2)The directions for the use of the drug.
(3)The name of the patient or patients.
(4)The name of the prescriber or, if applicable, the name of the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6.
(5)The date of issue.
(6)The name and address of the pharmacy, and prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(7)The strength of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(8)The quantity of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(9)The expiration date of the effectiveness of the drug dispensed.
(10)The condition or purpose for which the drug was prescribed if the condition or purpose is indicated on the prescription.
(11)(A)Commencing January 1, 2006, the physical description of the dispensed medication, including its color, shape, and any identification code that appears on the tablets or capsules, except as follows:
(i)Prescriptions dispensed by a veterinarian.
(ii)An exemption from the requirements of this paragraph shall be granted to a new drug for the first 120 days that the drug is on the market and for the 90 days during which the national reference file has no description on file.
(iii)Dispensed medications for which no physical description exists in a commercially available database.
(B)This paragraph applies to outpatient pharmacies only.
(C)The information required by this paragraph may be printed on an auxiliary label that is affixed to the prescription container.
(D)This paragraph shall not become operative if the board, prior to January 1, 2006, adopts regulations that mandate the same labeling requirements set forth in this paragraph.
(b)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescribed drug by means of a unit dose medication system, as defined by administrative regulation, for a patient in a skilled nursing, intermediate care, or other health care facility, the requirements of this section will be satisfied if the unit dose medication system contains the aforementioned information or the information is otherwise readily available at the time of drug administration.
(c)If a pharmacist dispenses a dangerous drug or device in a facility licensed pursuant to Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, it is not necessary to include on individual unit dose containers for a specific patient, the name of the certified nurse-midwife who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 2746.51, the nurse practitioner who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure described in Section 2836.1 or protocol, the physician assistant who functions pursuant to Section 3502.1, the naturopathic doctor who functions pursuant to a standardized procedure or protocol described in Section 3640.5, or the pharmacist who functions pursuant to a policy, procedure, or protocol pursuant to Section 4052.1, 4052.2, or 4052.6.
(d)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescription drug for use in a facility licensed pursuant to Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, it is not necessary to include the information required in paragraph (11) of subdivision (a) when the prescription drug is administered to a patient by a person licensed under the Medical Practice Act (Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000)), the Nursing Practice Act (Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 2700)), or the Vocational Nursing Practice Act (Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 2840)), who is acting within the scope of practice.
(e)A pharmacist shall use professional judgment to provide a patient with directions for use that enhance the patients understanding of those directions, consistent with the prescribers instructions.
(f)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other law, a pharmacist may dispense a drug prescribed pursuant to Section 120582 of the Health and Safety Code and label the drug without the name of an individual for whom the drug is intended if the prescription includes the words expedited partner therapy or the letters EPT.
(g)(2)A pharmacist who prescribes, dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders EPT, as authorized in subdivision (f), shall not be liable in, and shall not be subject to, a civil, criminal, or administrative action, sanction, or penalty for rendering EPT, if the use of EPT is in compliance with this section, except in cases of intentional misconduct, gross negligence, or wanton or reckless activity.
(h)(3)A pharmacist who provides EPT under this section shall provide written notification that describes the right of an individual who receives EPT to consult with a pharmacist about the medication dispensed and additional information regarding possible drug interactions.
(g)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other law, a pharmacist may, at their discretion, dispense brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the prescriber as required in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) or the name and address of the pharmacy as required in paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) if the prescription is labeled with a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(2)A pharmacist who dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion, as authorized in paragraph (1), shall maintain a log with the prescription numbers and the information required in paragraphs (1) to (10), inclusive, of subdivision (a).
(3)Notwithstanding Section 4081, all records maintained under paragraph (2) shall not be open to inspection by law enforcement without a valid, court-issued subpoena.
(4)This subdivision does not prohibit the investigation of an activity that is punishable as a crime under the laws of this state, provided that records maintained under paragraph (2) are not shared with an individual or entity from another state.
(5)A pharmacist shall inform the patient that the pharmacist is dispensing brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion as authorized by this subdivision.
SEC. 9.Section 4318 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:4318.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)The board shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)The board shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
(d)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 10.Section 4521 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:4521.The board may suspend or revoke a license issued under this chapter for any of the following reasons:
(a)Unprofessional conduct, which includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:
(1)Incompetence or gross negligence in carrying out usual psychiatric technician functions.
(2)A conviction of practicing medicine without a license in violation of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000) of Division 2, the record of conviction being conclusive evidence thereof.
(3)The use of advertising relating to psychiatric technician services which violates Section 17500.
(4)Obtain or possess in violation of law, or prescribe, or, except as directed by a licensed physician and surgeon, dentist, or podiatrist, administer to the licensee or furnish or administer to another, any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code or any dangerous drug as defined in Section 4022.
(5)Use any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code, or any dangerous drug as defined in Section 4022, or alcoholic beverages, to an extent or in a manner dangerous or injurious to the licensee, any other person, or the public or to the extent that the use impairs the ability to conduct with safety to the public the practice authorized by their license.
(6)Be convicted of a criminal offense involving the falsification of records concerning prescription, possession, or consumption of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), in which event the record of the conviction is conclusive evidence of the conviction. The board may inquire into the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime in order to fix the degree of discipline.
(7)Be committed or confined by a court of competent jurisdiction for intemperate use of or addiction to the use of any of the substances described in paragraphs (4) and (5), in which event the court order of commitment or confinement is prima facie evidence of the commitment or confinement.
(8)Falsify, or make grossly incorrect, grossly inconsistent, or unintelligible entries in any hospital, patient, or other record pertaining to the substances described in paragraph (4).
(b)Procuring a certificate or license by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
(c)Procuring, or aiding, or abetting, or attempting, or agreeing or offering to procure or assist at a criminal abortion.(d)(c)Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violation of, or conspiring to violate any provision or terms of this chapter.
(e)(d)Giving any false statement or information in connection with an application.
(f)(e)Conviction of any offense substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a psychiatric technician, in which event the record of the conviction shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction. The board may inquire into the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime in order to fix the degree of discipline.
(g)(f)Impersonating any applicant or acting as proxy for an applicant in any examination required by this chapter.
(h)(g)Impersonating another practitioner, or permitting another person to use the licensees certificate or license.
(i)(h)The use of excessive force upon or the mistreatment or abuse of any patient.
(j)(i)Aiding or assisting, or agreeing to aid or assist any person or persons, whether a licensed physician or not, in the performance of or arranging for a violation of any of the provisions of Article 12 (commencing with Section 2220) of Chapter 5 of Division 2.
(k)(j)Failure to maintain confidentiality of patient medical information, except as disclosure is otherwise permitted or required by law.
(l)(k)Failure to report the commission of any act prohibited by this section.
(m)(l)The commission of any act punishable as a sexually related crime, if that act is substantially related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(n)(m)The commission of any act involving dishonesty, when that action is substantially related to the duties and functions of the licensee.
(o)(n)Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines, thereby risking transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases from licensee to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensee. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, guidelines, and regulations pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the Medical Board of California, the Board of Dental Examiners, and the Board of Registered Nursing, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this section.
The(o)The board shall seek to ensure that licentiates and others regulated by the board are informed of the responsibility of licentiates and others to follow infection control guidelines, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases.
SEC. 11.Section 6925 of the Family Code is amended to read:6925.(a)A minor may consent to medical care related to the prevention or treatment of pregnancy.
(b)This section does not authorize a minor: minor to be sterilized without the consent of the minors parent or guardian.
(1)To be sterilized without the consent of the minors parent or guardian.(2)To receive an abortion without the consent of a parent or guardian other than as provided in Section 123450 of the Health and Safety Code.SEC. 12.Section 1220.2 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:1220.2.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensee concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)The department shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)The department shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
(d)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 13.Section 1265.12 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:1265.12.(a)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer shall not commence a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensee concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)The department shall not suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise take disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)The department shall not deny an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
(d)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 14.Section 1367.21 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1367.21.(a)No A health care service plan contract which that covers prescription drug benefits shall not be issued, amended, delivered, or renewed in this state if the plan limits or excludes coverage for a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the federal United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), provided that all of the following conditions have been met:
(1)The drug is approved by the FDA.
(2)(A)The drug is prescribed by a participating licensed health care professional for the treatment of a life-threatening condition; or
(B)The drug is prescribed by a participating licensed health care professional for the treatment of a chronic and seriously debilitating condition, the drug is medically necessary to treat that condition, and the drug is on the plan formulary. If the drug is not on the plan formulary, the participating subscribers request shall be considered pursuant to the process required by Section 1367.24.
(3)The drug has been recognized for treatment of that condition by any of the following:
(A)The American Hospital Formulary Services Drug Information.
(B)One of the following compendia, if recognized by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as part of an anticancer chemotherapeutic regimen:
(i)The Elsevier Gold Standards Clinical Pharmacology.
(ii)The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Drug and Biologics Compendium.
(iii)The Thomson Micromedex DrugDex.
(C)Two articles from major peer reviewed medical journals that present data supporting the proposed off-label use or uses as generally safe and effective unless there is clear and convincing contradictory evidence presented in a major peer reviewed medical journal.
(b)(1)A health care service plan contract that covers prescription drug benefits shall not be issued, amended, delivered, or renewed in this state if the contract limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to Section 355-1 of Title 21 of the United States Code, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(2)A health care service plan contract that covers prescription drug benefits shall not be issued, amended, delivered, or renewed in this state if the contract limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone regardless of its FDA approval status, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(b)(c)It shall be the responsibility of the participating prescriber to submit to the plan documentation supporting compliance with the requirements of subdivision (a), if requested by the plan.
(c)(d)Any coverage required by this section shall also include medically necessary services associated with the administration of a drug, subject to the conditions of the contract.
(d)(e)For purposes of this section, life-threatening means either or both of the following:
(1)Diseases or conditions where the likelihood of death is high unless the course of the disease is interrupted.
(2)Diseases or conditions with potentially fatal outcomes, where the end point of clinical intervention is survival.
(e)(f)For purposes of this section, chronic and seriously debilitating means diseases or conditions that require ongoing treatment to maintain remission or prevent deterioration and cause significant long-term morbidity.
(f)(g)The provision of drugs and services when required by this section shall not, in itself, give rise to liability on the part of the plan.
(g)Nothing in this section shall be construed to(h)This section does not prohibit the use of a formulary, copayment, technology assessment panel, or similar mechanism as a means for appropriately controlling the utilization of a drug that is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA.
(h)(i)If a plan denies coverage pursuant to this section on the basis that its use is experimental or investigational, that decision is subject to review under Section 1370.4.
(i)(j)Health care service plan contracts for the delivery of Medi-Cal services under the Waxman-Duffy Prepaid Health Plan Act (Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200) of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code) are exempt from the requirements of this section.
SEC. 15.Section 1375.61 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1375.61.(a)A contract issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2024, between a health care service plan and a provider of health care services shall not contain any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, based solely on a either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another disciplinary action in another state, if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)A health care service plan shall not discriminate, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of a either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)This section does not apply to a civil judgment, a criminal conviction, or a disciplinary action imposed in another state based upon conduct that would subject a provider to claim, charge, or action under the laws of this state.
SEC. 16.Section 111376 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:111376.(a)The department may adopt regulations relating to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion by including brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion within, or excluding brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion from, the requirements of this article, whether or not the inclusion or exclusion of the drug is in accordance with federal law.
(b)Notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution, this article shall not apply to brand name or generic mifepristone in the event of a labeling change or in the absence of its United States Food and Drug Administration approval, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(c)The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 17.Section 111480 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:111480.Any (a)A drug or device sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device shall be exempt from the labeling requirements of Sections 111335, 111340, 111350, 111355, 111360, 111365, 111375, 111380, 111385, 111395, 111415, and 111420, if the drug or device bears a label displaying all the following:
(a)(1)Except where the prescriber orders otherwise, either the manufacturers trade name of the drug, or the generic name and the name of the manufacturer. Commonly used abbreviations may be used. Preparations containing two or more active ingredients may be identified by the manufacturers trade name or the commonly used name or the principal active ingredients.
(b)(2)The directions for the use of the drug or device.
(c)(3)The name of the patient(s).
(d)(4)The name of the prescriber.
(e)(5)The date of issue.
(f)(6)The name, address of the furnisher, and prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
(g)(7)The strength of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(h)(8)The quantity of the drug or drugs dispensed.
(i)(9)The expiration date of the effectiveness of the drug or device if the information is included on the original label of the manufacturer of the drug or device.
(b)Brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device shall be exempt from the labeling requirements of Sections 111335, 111340, 111355, 111360, 111365, 111375, 111380, 111385, 111395, 111415, and 111420, if the label complies with subdivision (g) of Section 4076 of the Business and Professions Code.
If(c)If a pharmacist dispenses a prescribed drug by means of a unit dose medication system, as defined by administrative regulation, for a patient in a skilled nursing, intermediate care or other health care facility, the requirements of this section will subdivision (a) shall be satisfied if the unit dose medication system contains the aforementioned information required pursuant to subdivision (a) or the information is otherwise readily available at the time of drug administration.
The(d)The exemption in subdivision (a) shall not apply to any drug or device dispensed in the course of the conduct of a business of dispensing drugs or devices pursuant to diagnosis by mail, or to a drug or device dispensed in violation of Section 111470.
SEC. 18.Section 10123.195 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10123.195.(a)No A group or individual disability insurance policy issued, delivered, or renewed in this state or certificate of group disability insurance issued, delivered, or renewed in this state pursuant to a master group policy issued, delivered, or renewed in another state that, as a provision of hospital, medical, or surgical services, directly or indirectly covers prescription drugs shall not limit or exclude coverage for a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the federal United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), provided that all of the following conditions have been met:
(1)The drug is approved by the FDA.
(2)(A)The drug is prescribed by a contracting licensed health care professional for the treatment of a life-threatening condition; or
(B)The drug is prescribed by a contracting licensed health care professional for the treatment of a chronic and seriously debilitating condition, the drug is medically necessary to treat that condition, and the drug is on the insurers formulary, if any.
(3)The drug has been recognized for treatment of that condition by any of the following:
(A)The American Hospital Formulary Services Drug Information.
(B)One of the following compendia, if recognized by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as part of an anticancer chemotherapeutic regimen:
(i)The Elsevier Gold Standards Clinical Pharmacology.
(ii)The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Drug and Biologics Compendium.
(iii)The Thomson Micromedex DrugDex.
(C)Two articles from major peer reviewed medical journals that present data supporting the proposed off-label use or uses as generally safe and effective unless there is clear and convincing contradictory evidence presented in a major peer reviewed medical journal.
(b)(1)A group or individual disability insurance policy issued, delivered, or renewed in this state or certificate of group disability insurance issued, delivered, or renewed in this state pursuant to a master group policy issued, delivered, or renewed in another state that, as a provision of hospital, medical, or surgical services, directly or indirectly covers prescription drugs shall not limit or exclude coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to Section 355-1 of Title 21 of the United States Code, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(2)A group or individual disability insurance policy issued, delivered, or renewed in this state or certificate of group disability insurance issued, delivered, or renewed in this state pursuant to a master group policy issued, delivered, or renewed in another state that, as a provision of hospital, medical, or surgical services, directly or indirectly covers prescription drugs shall not be issued, amended, delivered, or renewed in this state if the policy limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone regardless of its FDA approval status, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
(b)(c)It shall be the responsibility of the contracting prescriber to submit to the insurer documentation supporting compliance with the requirements of subdivision (a), if requested by the insurer.
(c)(d)Any coverage required by this section shall also include medically necessary services associated with the administration of a drug subject to the conditions of the contract. policy.
(d)(e)For purposes of this section, life-threatening means either or both of the following:
(1)Diseases or conditions where the likelihood of death is high unless the course of the disease is interrupted.
(2)Diseases or conditions with potentially fatal outcomes, where the end point of clinical intervention is survival.
(e)(f)For purposes of this section, chronic and seriously debilitating means diseases or conditions that require ongoing treatment to maintain remission or prevent deterioration and cause significant long-term morbidity.
(f)(g)The provision of drugs and services when required by this section shall not, in itself, give rise to liability on the part of the insurer.
(g)(h)This section shall not apply to a policy of disability insurance that covers hospital, medical, or surgical expenses which that is issued outside of California to an employer whose principal place of business is located outside of California.
(h)Nothing in this section shall be construed to(i)This section does not prohibit the use of a formulary, copayment, technology assessment panel, or similar mechanism as a means for appropriately controlling the utilization of a drug that is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA.
(i)(j)If an insurer denies coverage pursuant to this section on the basis that its use is experimental or investigational, that decision is subject to review under the Independent Medical Review System of Article 3.5 (commencing with Section 10169).
(j)(k)This section is not applicable to vision-only, dental-only, Medicare or Champus supplement, disability income, long-term care, accident-only, specified disease or hospital confinement indemnity insurance.
SEC. 19.Section 10133.641 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10133.641.(a)A contract issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2024, between a health insurer and a provider of health care services shall not contain any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, based solely on a either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another professional disciplinary action in another state, if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(b)A health insurer shall not discriminate, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of a either of the following:
(1)A civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another professional disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or professional disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another states law that interferes with a persons right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in this state.
(2)The manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
(c)This section does not apply to a civil judgment, a criminal conviction, or a disciplinary action imposed in another state based upon conduct that would subject a provider to claim, charge, or action under the laws of this state.
(d)The commissioner may enforce this section pursuant to Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 11400) or Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 11500) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. This subdivision does not impair or restrict the commissioners enforcement authority pursuant to another provision of this code or the Administrative Procedure Act.
SEC. 20.Section 1108 of the Penal Code is repealed.1108.Upon a trial for procuring or attempting to procure an abortion, or aiding or assisting therein, or for inveigling, enticing, or taking away an unmarried female of previous chaste character, under the age of eighteen years, for the purpose of prostitution, or aiding or assisting therein, the defendant cannot be convicted upon the testimony of the woman upon or with whom the offense was committed, unless she is corroborated by other evidence.SEC. 21.Section 3405 of the Penal Code is amended to read:3405.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by an incarcerated person, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in that act. those provisions. Impermissible restrictions include, but are not limited to, imposing gestational limits inconsistent with state law, unreasonably delaying access to the procedure, or requiring court-ordered transport. Incarcerated persons found to be pregnant and desiring abortions, shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to state and federal law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion after giving informed consent.
(b)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all incarcerated persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 22.Section 4028 of the Penal Code is amended to read:4028.(a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by a person detained in any local detention facility, pursuant to Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in that act, shall not be imposed. those provisions. Impermissible restrictions include, but are not limited to, imposing gestational limits inconsistent with state law, unreasonably delaying access to the procedure, or requiring court-ordered transportation. Persons found to be pregnant and desiring abortions shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to state and federal law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion, after providing informed consent.
(b)For the purposes of this section, local detention facility means any city, county, or regional facility used for the confinement of any female person for more than 24 hours. hours of a person capable of becoming pregnant.
(c)The rights provided by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all incarcerated persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 23.Section 220 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:220.No (a)A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by a female an individual detained in any local juvenile facility, pursuant to the Therapeutic Abortion Act (Article 2 (commencing with Section 123400) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in that act, shall be imposed. Females those provisions. Individuals found to be pregnant and desiring abortions, shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion.
For(b)For the purposes of this section, local juvenile facility means any city, county, or regional facility used for the confinement of female juveniles for more than 24 hours.
The(c)The rights provided for females by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all females committed persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 24.Section 1773 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:1773.(a)No A condition or restriction shall not be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by a female an individual committed to the Division of Juvenile Facilities, pursuant to the Therapeutic Abortion Act (Article 2 (commencing with Section 123400) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), Sections 1 and 1.1 of Article I of the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code), other than those contained in that act, shall be imposed. Females those provisions. Individuals found to be pregnant and desiring abortions shall be permitted to determine their eligibility for an abortion pursuant to law, and if determined to be eligible, shall be permitted to obtain an abortion.
(b)The rights provided for females by this section shall be posted in at least one conspicuous place to which all females committed persons capable of becoming pregnant have access.
SEC. 25.Section 14043.8 is added to the Welfare and Institutions Code, to read:14043.8.(a)The department shall update the Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirement and procedures for remote service providers who offer reproductive health care services exclusively through telehealth modalities seeking enrollment in the Medi-Cal program to report an administrative location as their service address. That administrative location shall be exempt from the following established place of business requirements listed in Section 51000.60(c) of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations:
(1)Displays regular and permanently posted business hours.
(2)Is identifiable as a medical or health care provider or business by permanently attached signage that identifies the name of the provider or business as shown on the application.
(3)Obtains and maintains liability insurance coverage, which covers premises and operation, in an amount not less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) per claim with a minimum annual aggregate of not less than three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) from an authorized insurer, pursuant to Section 700 of the Insurance Code.
(b)The department shall modify the requirement set forth in Section 51000.4 of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations to permit the use of a cellular telephone as the primary business phone for reproductive health care providers.
(c)A provider subject to this section shall meet current Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirements and standards.
(d)For purposes of this section, reproductive health care services has the same meaning as defined in Section 1798.300 of the Civil Code when those services meet the applicable standard of care and may be appropriately delivered via the telehealth modalities.
SEC. 26.Section 14132.725 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:14132.725.(a)For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Asynchronous store and forward has the same meaning as set forth in subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code. Transmission under asynchronous store and forward also includes asynchronous electronic transmission initiated directly by patients, including through mobile telephone applications.
(1)(2)Border community means border areas adjacent to the State of California where it is customary practice for California residents to use medical resources in adjacent areas outside the state. Under these circumstances, program controls and limitations are the same as for services rendered by health care providers within the state.
(2)(3)Health care provider has the same meaning as set forth in paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code, and shall be either enrolled as a Medi-Cal rendering provider, or a nonphysician medical practitioner affiliated with an enrolled Medi-Cal provider group. Health care provider also includes any provider type designated by the department pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b). The enrolled Medi-Cal provider or provider group for which the health care provider renders services via telehealth shall meet all Medi-Cal requirements and shall be located in the state or a border community.
(3)(4)Health care service plan has the same meaning as set forth in subdivision (f) of Section 1345 of the Health and Safety Code.
(4)(5)Medi-Cal managed care plan has the same meaning as set forth in subdivision (j) of Section 14184.101.
(5)(6)Network provider has the same meaning as set forth in Section 438.2 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
(6)(7)Telehealth has the same meaning as set forth in paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code.
(b)(1)Subject to subdivision (k), in-person, face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient is not required under the Medi-Cal program for covered health care services and provider types designated by the department, when provided by video synchronous interaction, asynchronous store and forward, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code, audio-only synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other permissible virtual communication modalities, when those services and settings meet the applicable standard of care and meet the requirements of the service code being billed.
(2)(A)In implementing this section, the department shall designate and periodically update the covered health care services and provider types, including required licensing and credentialing criteria, as applicable, which may be appropriately delivered via the telehealth modalities described in this subdivision.
(B)Applicable health care services appropriately provided through video synchronous interaction, asynchronous store and forward, audio-only synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other permissible virtual communication modalities are subject to billing, reimbursement, and utilization management policies imposed by the department. Subject to subdivision (k), utilization management protocols adopted by the department pursuant to this section shall be consistent with, and no more restrictive than, those authorized for health care service plans pursuant to Section 1374.13 of the Health and Safety Code.
(c)(1)(A)Pursuant to an effective date designated by the department that is no sooner than January 1, 2024, a Medi-Cal provider furnishing applicable health care services via audio-only synchronous interaction shall also offer those same health care services via video synchronous interaction to preserve beneficiary choice.
(B)(i)The department may provide specific exceptions to the requirement specified in subparagraph (A), based on a Medi-Cal providers access to requisite technologies, which shall be developed in consultation with affected stakeholders and published in departmental guidance.
(ii)In making exceptions to the requirement specified in subparagraph (A), in addition to the provisions in clause (i), the department may also take into consideration the availability of broadband access based on speed standards set by the Federal Communications Commission, pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-104) or other applicable federal law or regulation.
(2)Effective on the date designated by the department pursuant to paragraph (1), a provider furnishing services through video synchronous interaction or audio-only synchronous interaction shall also maintain and follow protocols to do one of the following:
(A)Offer those services via in-person, face-to-face contact.
(B)(i)Arrange for a referral to, and a facilitation of, in-person care that does not require a patient to independently contact a different provider to arrange for that care.
(ii)Clause (i) does not require a provider to schedule an appointment with a different provider on behalf of a patient.
(3)In implementing this subdivision, the department shall consider additional recommendations from affected stakeholders regarding the need to maintain access to in-person services without unduly restricting access to telehealth services.
(4)A health care provider may establish a new patient relationship with a Medi-Cal beneficiary via video synchronous interaction consistent with any requirements imposed by the department.
(5)(A)A health care provider shall not establish a new patient relationship with a Medi-Cal beneficiary via asynchronous store and forward, telephonic (audio-only) synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other virtual communication modalities, except as set forth in paragraph (4) of subdivision (g) of Section 14132.100.
(B)Notwithstanding the prohibition in subparagraph (A), the department may provide for specific exceptions to this prohibition, the department may provide for specific exceptions described in clauses (i) and (ii), to (iii), inclusive, which shall be developed in consultation with affected stakeholders and published in departmental guidance.
(i)Notwithstanding the prohibition in subparagraph (A), a health care provider may establish a new patient relationship using an audio-only synchronous interaction or asynchronous store and forward when the visit is related to sensitive services, as defined in subdivision (p) (s) of Section 56.05 of the Civil Code, and when established in accordance with department-specific requirements and consistent with federal and state law, regulations, and guidance.
(ii)Notwithstanding the prohibition in subparagraph (A), a health care provider may establish a new patient relationship using an audio-only synchronous interaction when the patient requests an audio-only modality or attests they do not have access to video, and when established in accordance with department-specific requirements and consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance.
(iii)Notwithstanding the prohibition in subparagraph (A), a health care provider may establish a new patient relationship using asynchronous store and forward if the visit is related to reproductive health care services, as defined in subdivision (e) of Section 1798.300 of the Civil Code, if those services meet the applicable standard of care and may be appropriately delivered via the telehealth modalities, the patient requests an asynchronous store and forward modality, and the relationship is established in accordance with department-specific requirements and consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance.
(6)Subject to subdivision (k), the department may establish separate fee schedules for applicable health care services delivered via remote patient monitoring or other permissible virtual communication modalities.
(7)This subdivision does not apply to Medi-Cal covered services delivered by providers via any telehealth modality to eligible inmates in state prisons, county jails, or youth correctional facilities.
(d)In addition to any existing law requiring beneficiary consent to telehealth, including, but not limited to, subdivision (b) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code, all of the following shall be communicated by a health care provider to a Medi-Cal beneficiary, in writing or verbally, on at least one occasion prior to, or concurrent with, initiating the delivery of one or more health care services via telehealth to a Medi-Cal beneficiary: an explanation that beneficiaries have the right to access covered services that may be delivered via telehealth through an in-person, face-to-face visit; an explanation that use of telehealth is voluntary and that consent for the use of telehealth can be withdrawn at any time by the Medi-Cal beneficiary without affecting their ability to access covered Medi-Cal services in the future; an explanation of the availability of Medi-Cal coverage for transportation services to in-person visits when other available resources have been reasonably exhausted; and the potential limitations or risks related to receiving services through telehealth as compared to an in-person visit, to the extent any limitations or risks are identified by the provider.
(1)The provider shall document in the patient record the provision of this information and the patients verbal or written acknowledgment that the information was received.
(2)The department shall develop, in consultation with affected stakeholders, model language for purposes of the communication described in this subdivision.
(3)This subdivision does not apply to Medi-Cal covered services delivered by providers via any telehealth modality to eligible inmates in state prisons, county jails, or youth correctional facilities.
(e)(1)The department shall develop, in consultation with affected stakeholders, an informational notice to be distributed to fee-for-service Medi-Cal beneficiaries and for use by Medi-Cal managed care plans in communicating to their enrollees. Information in the notice shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following:
(A)The availability of Medi-Cal covered telehealth services.
(B)The beneficiarys right to access all medically necessary covered services through in-person, face-to-face visits, and a providers and Medi-Cal managed care plans responsibility to offer or arrange for that in-person care, as applicable.
(C)An explanation that use of telehealth is voluntary and that consent for the use of telehealth can be withdrawn by the Medi-Cal beneficiary at any time without affecting their ability to access covered Medi-Cal services in the future.
(D)An explanation of the availability of Medi-Cal coverage for transportation services to in-person visits when other available resources have been reasonably exhausted.
(E)Notification of the beneficiarys right to make complaints about the offer of telehealth services in lieu of in-person care or about the quality of care delivered through telehealth.
(2)The informational notice shall be translated into threshold languages determined by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 14029.91 and provided in a format that is culturally and linguistically appropriate.
(3)This subdivision does not apply to Medi-Cal covered services delivered by providers via any telehealth modality to eligible inmates in state prisons, county jails, or youth correctional facilities.
(f)(1)Subject to subdivision (k), the department shall reimburse health care providers of applicable health care services delivered via video synchronous interaction, synchronous audio-only modality, or asynchronous store and forward, as applicable, at payment amounts that are not less than the amounts the provider would receive if the services were delivered via in-person, face-to-face contact, so long as the services or settings meet the applicable standard of care and meet the requirements of the service code being billed.
(2)Subject to subdivision (k), for applicable health care services appropriately provided by a network provider via video synchronous interaction, audio-only synchronous interaction modality, or asynchronous store and forward, as applicable, to an enrollee of a Medi-Cal managed care plan, the Medi-Cal managed care plan shall reimburse the network provider at payment amounts that are not less than the amounts the network provider would have received if the services were delivered via in-person, face-to-face contact, unless the Medi-Cal managed care plan and network provider mutually agree to reimbursement in different amounts.
(g)On or before January 1, 2023, the department shall develop a research and evaluation plan that does all of the following:
(1)Proposes strategies to analyze the relationship between telehealth and the following: access to care, access to in-person care, quality of care, and Medi-Cal program costs, utilization, and program integrity.
(2)Examines issues using an equity framework that includes stratification by available geographic and demographic factors, including, but not limited to, race, ethnicity, primary language, age, and gender, to understand inequities and disparities in care.
(3)Prioritizes research and evaluation questions that directly inform Medi-Cal policy.
(h)Applicable health care services provided through asynchronous store and forward, video synchronous interaction, audio-only synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other permissible virtual communication modalities as described in this section shall comply with the privacy and security requirements contained in the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 found in Parts 160 and 164 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the Medicaid State Plan, and any other applicable state and federal statutes and regulations.
(i)Notwithstanding Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, the department may implement, interpret, and make specific this section by means of all-county letters, plan letters, provider bulletins, and similar instructions, without taking any further regulatory action.
(j)Consistent with the requirements of this section and subject to subdivision (k), a PACE organization approved by the department pursuant to Chapter 8.75 (commencing with Section 14591) may use video telehealth to conduct initial assessments and annual reassessments for eligibility for enrollment in the PACE program.
(k)The department shall seek any federal approvals it deems necessary to implement this section. This section shall be implemented only to the extent that any necessary federal approvals are obtained and federal financial participation is available and is not otherwise jeopardized.
(l)This section shall be operative on January 1, 2023, or on the operative date or dates reflected in the applicable federal approvals obtained by the department pursuant to subdivision (k), whichever is later.
(m)This section does not apply to health care services provided via telehealth in an FQHC or RHC visit as described in paragraph (4) of subdivision (g) of Section 14132.100.
SEC. 27.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
SECTION 1.It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to ensure that patients can continue to access care, including abortion, gender-affirming care, and other sexual and reproductive health care in California, and to allow patients to access care through asynchronous modes. REVISIONS: HeadingLines 2 and 3.It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to ensure that patients can continue to access care, including abortion, gender-affirming care, and other sexual and reproductive health care in California, and to allow patients to access care through asynchronous modes.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2025 | Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 136, Statutes of 2025. |
| Sep 26, 2025 | Approved by the Governor. |
| Sep 22, 2025 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m. |
| Sep 10, 2025 | Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 61. Noes 12. Page 3193.). |
| Sep 9, 2025 | In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. |
| Sep 9, 2025 | Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 30. Noes 8. Page 2736.). |
| Sep 8, 2025 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Sep 5, 2025 | Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading. |
| Aug 29, 2025 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Aug 29, 2025 | From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 29). |
| Jul 7, 2025 | In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file. |
| Jun 23, 2025 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Jun 18, 2025 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. P. & E.D. |
| Jun 13, 2025 | Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. P. & E.D. |
| Jun 12, 2025 | From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on B. P. & E.D. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 11). |
| Jun 2, 2025 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. |
| May 28, 2025 | Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and B. P. & E.D. |
| May 20, 2025 | In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. |
| May 19, 2025 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 61. Noes 11. Page 1601.) |
| May 15, 2025 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| May 14, 2025 | From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (May 14). |
| Apr 29, 2025 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 1.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Apr 29, 2025 | Coauthors revised. |
| Apr 9, 2025 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. (Ayes 12. Noes 1.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on B. & P. |
| Apr 9, 2025 | Coauthors revised. |
| Mar 18, 2025 | Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. |
| Mar 17, 2025 | Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and B. & P. |
| Mar 17, 2025 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended. |
| Jan 17, 2025 | From printer. May be heard in committee February 16. |
| Jan 16, 2025 | Read first time. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2025 | AB 260 Aguiar-Curry Concurrence - Urgency Added | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Sep 9, 2025 | Assembly 3rd Reading AB260 Aguiar-Curry et al. By Limón Urgency Clause | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Aug 29, 2025 | Do pass | Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Jul 7, 2025 | Placed on suspense file | Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Jun 23, 2025 | Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Senate Standing Committee on Business, Professions and Economic Development |
Passed |
|
| Jun 11, 2025 | Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Business, Professions and Economic Development] | Senate Standing Committee on Health |
Passed |
|
| May 19, 2025 | AB 260 Aguiar-Curry Assembly Third Reading | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| May 14, 2025 | Do pass. | Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Apr 29, 2025 | Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Assembly Standing Committee on Business and Professions |
Passed |
|
| Apr 8, 2025 | Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Business and Professions] | Assembly Standing Committee on Health |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine Access | ** Support | |
| Access Reproductive Justice | ** Support | |
| American Association Of University Women California | ** Support | |
| American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists | ** Support | |
| Attorney General Rob Bonta | ** Support | |
| Black Women For Wellness Action Project | ** Support | |
| California Academy Of Family Physicians | ** Support | |
| California Baptist for Biblical Values | ** Against | |
| California Family Council | ** Against | |
| California Latinas for Reproductive Justice | ** Support | |
| California Medical Association | ** Support | |
| California Nurse Midwives Association | ** Support | |
| California Pan-Ethnic Health Network | ** Support | |
| California Pharmacists Association | ** Support | |
| California State Treasurer | ** Support | |
| California State Treasurer Fiona Ma | ** Support | |
| California Women Lawyers | ** Support | |
| California Womens Law Center | ** Support | |
| Citizens for Choice | ** Support | |
| County Of Los Angeles | ** Support | |
| County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors | ** Support | |
| Equal Rights Advocates | ** Support | |
| Equal Rights California | ** Support | |
| Equality California | ** Support | |
| Essential Access Health | ** Support | |
| Green Policy Initiative | ** Support | |
| Hadassah | ** Support | |
| Hey Jane | ** Support | |
| JCC/Federation of San Luis Obispo | ** Support | |
| JCRC Bay Area | ** Support | |
| Jewish Community Federation and Endowment Fund | ** Support | |
| Jewish Democratic Club of Marin | ** Support | |
| Jewish Family & Children’s Services of San Francisco, the Peninsula, Marin & Sonoma Counties | ** Support | |
| Jewish Family Service LA | ** Support | |
| Jewish Family Service of San Diego | ** Support | |
| Jewish Family Services of Silicon Valley | ** Support | |
| Jewish Federation of The Greater San Gabriel and Pomona Valleys | ** Support | |
| Jewish Free Loan Association | ** Support | |
| Jewish Long Beach | ** Support | |
| Jewish Public Affairs Committee Of California | ** Support | |
| JFCS Long Beach and Orange County | ** Support | |
| JVS SoCal | ** Support | |
| League Of Women Voters Of California | ** Support | |
| Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis | ** Support | |
| National Health Law Program | ** Support | |
| One individual | ** Against | |
| Osteopathic Medical Board of California | ** Support | |
| Pacific Justice Institute Center for Public Policy | ** Against | |
| Parent Voices California | ** Support | |
| Planned Parenthood Affiliates Of California | ** Support | |
| Reproductive Freedom for All | ** Support | |
| San Francisco Bay Area Black & Jewish Unity Coalition | ** Support | |
| TEACH | ** Support | |
| The Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine | ** Support | |
| Training In Early Abortion For Comprehensive Healthcare | ** Support | |
| Unite for Reproductive & Gender Equity | ** Support | |
| Urge | ** Support | |
| Women'S Foundation California | ** Support | |
| Women’s Health Specialist’s | ** Support |
CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
CSA1 Bill Id:AB 260
Author:(Aguiar-Curry)
As Amended Ver:September 05, 2025
2/3 vote. Urgency.
SUMMARY
Repeals unconstitutional, and deletes obsolete provisions of current law relating to criminal abortion penalties. Authorizes the California Department of Public Health (DPH) to adopt regulations specific to mifepristone and other medication abortion drugs, including exempting those drugs from certain requirements if the drugs are no longer approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Places various requirements on pharmacists related to prescribing and dispensing mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs. Prohibits DPH from taking criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a clinic or health facility for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs. Requires the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to update provider enrollment requirements and procedures for remote service providers who offer reproductive health care services exclusively thorough telehealth modalities. Prohibits a health care service plan contract or a group or individual disability insurance policy that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, regardless of its FDA approval status. Makes various changes to requirements specific to healing arts practitioners who are authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer certain drugs.
Senate Amendments
- Authorize a pharmacist to dispense mifepristone or other drug used for medication abortion without the name of the patient on the label;
- Revise provisions related to prescribing mifepristone or other mediation abortion drugs in the absence of FDA approval to include that the drug also be recommended for use by the World Health Organization and its labeling was true and accurate at the time of manufacture;
- Strike provisions of the bill that would have allowed for enrollment of Medi-Cal providers who offer reproductive services remotely or indirectly from their business address, and provisions that would have allowed for the establishment of a new patient relationship through asynchronous telehealth modalities for reproductive health care services;
- Extend safe harbor from liability provisions in existing law that require businesses to enable technological capabilities to protect the privacy and security of medical information related to abortion, contraception, and gender affirming care, from January 31, 2026, to January 31, 2027;
- This bill and AB 1503 (Berman) both amend the same code section. This bill is being amended to avoid chaptering out the other, should both bills be enacted; and,
- Add an urgency clause.
COMMENTS
Background. Every pregnant individual in California has the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, a right guaranteed the California Constitution and supported by other state laws protecting access to sexual and reproductive health care in the state. However, at the federal level, there is uncertainty about the continued access of abortion care, specifically as it relates to mifepristone, a drug used for medication abortion. Since taking office, the Trump Administration has taken action to restrict access to reproductive and sexual health care and vocalized that additional steps are imminent, rolling back existing protections and advancements, access, and equity achieved for patients, providers, and health facilities. In the first week of the Administration, President Trump signed an Executive Order directing agencies to review programs and calling for more stringent enforcement of the Hyde Amendment. Notably, the order indicates an intent to expand the reach of the Hyde Amendment, by further restricting not just the funding but also the "promotion" of abortion access, even in states like California. Additionally, despite years of research, the U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. further stated during his confirmation hearing that "President Trump has asked me to study the safety of mifepristone."
Mifepristone. Medication abortion allows individuals to receive safe and effective abortion care in a less invasive manner. Over two-thirds of all abortions in the U.S. are medication abortions. Mifepristone, a drug used in combination with a second drug – misoprostol – was approved by the FDA in 2000 to terminate a pregnancy. Decades of evidence show that medication abortion and the drugs used in the process are safe and effective.
According to a March 2024 American Medical Association brief, "Reducing access to mifepristone would harm patients," access to mifepristone significantly improves benefits for vulnerable communities, particularly those in rural areas, people of color, and low-income individuals, by expanding access to life-saving reproductive care. Mifepristone, when used with misoprostol, allows individuals to terminate pregnancies safely at home, which is especially crucial for those who live in maternity care deserts or face hardships traveling long distances for medical procedures.
Disparities in access to care. For women of color, low-income women, and rural residents, the dangers of pregnancy in the U.S. are exacerbated, as they are more likely to experience severe maternal morbidity or even pregnancy-related deaths. Additionally, these populations are disproportionately affected by restrictions on abortion care. Studies show that people of color make up the majority of abortion patients, with 75% living at or below 200% of the federal poverty level. Moreover, pregnant individuals of color are more likely to face early pregnancy loss or miscarriage, conditions for which mifepristone is used in treatment. The ability to access abortion care via telehealth, which has been a lifeline for many in these communities, further underscores how mifepristone can be a critical tool in improving access to essential reproductive care, ensuring that vulnerable populations are not left behind in their healthcare needs.
California Abortion Coverage. California law prohibits the state from denying or interfering with a person's right to choose or obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus, or when medically necessary. The state defines viability as the point in a pregnancy when, in the good faith medical judgment of a physician, there is a reasonable likelihood that a fetus will survive outside the uterus without "extraordinary medical measures." Abortion is considered a basic health care service in California and, therefore, is required to be covered by commercial health insurance plans and policies. Medically necessary follow-up services to abortions that constitute basic health care services must also be covered. Similarly, Medi-Cal covers abortion and related services comprehensively as a state-funded benefit.
Shield laws. Since the overturn of Roe v. Wade, eight states (California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington) have passed shield laws, which say that the state government will not comply with civil or criminal prosecutions targeting health care providers who perform abortions from their home states, including mailing medication to patients in places where the procedure is outlawed. Recently a doctor in New York was sued for mailing medication abortion to patients in Louisiana and Texas, two states in which abortion is heavily restricted. This bill seeks to mitigate the harm that could be caused if states can sue a doctor for dispensing or prescribing mifepristone by allowing pharmacists to keep certain information off of the prescription label. This policy has already been signed into law in New York.
According to the Author
For years, California has promoted access to reproductive health care without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers. However, recent lawsuits and actions by the federal government are exploring ways to limit states' ability to provide medication abortion drugs, posing a threat to Californians. This bill enhances access to medication abortion in California by protecting health care providers, facilities, and patients who access abortion medication. The author concludes that this bill ensures that the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, secured by the California Constitution, remains protected.
Arguments in Support
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California (PPAC) is the sponsor of this bill and states that medication abortion, and broad access to it, allows individuals to receive safe and effective abortion care in a least-invasive manner. PPAC notes that mifepristone, a drug used in combination with a second drug – misoprostol – to terminate a pregnancy through medication abortion, was approved by the FDA in 2000. Accordingly, scientists have studied the safety of mifepristone for over 25 years, and these decades of evidence show that medication abortion and the drugs used in the process are safe and effective. PPAC argues that this bill protects medication abortion by establishing that the current standard of care for the use of mifepristone will remain legal in this state, protecting providers that legally provide mifepristone and requiring the continuation of existing coverage for medication abortion. PPAC concludes that when access to the fundamental right to health care is under attack across the nation, this bill proactively codifies that the existing standard of practice for medication abortion so that it remains legal in California, regardless of federal actions.
Arguments in Opposition
The California Family Council (CFC) opposes this bill and states that over 10% of women who take mifepristone suffer serious complications such as sepsis, hemorrhaging, infection, or other dangerous adverse events within 45 days after the abortion. CFC contends that part of the reason that the abortion pill is so much more dangerous today than the clinical trials showed decades ago is that necessary safeguards have since been discarded. Women originally needed a physical exam from their doctor to check for dangerous conditions, had to report complications, and needed follow-up care. CFC concludes that at a time when women are lied to about mifepristone's safety and are already suffering because crucial safeguards have been abandoned, this bill shields reckless practices and removes any last shred of oversight, precaution, or transparency.
FISCAL COMMENTS
According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:
- The California State Board of Pharmacy and the California State Board of Naturopathic Medicine anticipate minor and absorbable fiscal impacts related to education of the bill's provisions.
- The Osteopathic Medical Board of California estimates additional enforcement workload costs of $25,015 per year, which would be absorbable.
- The California Department of Public Health (DPH) estimates no fiscal impact because the bill does not change DPH's existing policies and practices regarding facility licensure.
- The Department of Managed Health Care anticipates minor and absorbable costs for state administration (Managed Care Fund).
- Likely minor costs for the California Department of Insurance for state administration (Insurance Fund).
VOTES:
ASM HEALTH: 12-1-2
YES: Bonta, Addis, Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Carrillo, Mark González, Krell, Patel, Celeste Rodriguez, Schiavo, Sharp-Collins, Stefani
NO: Sanchez
ABS, ABST OR NV: Chen, Flora
ASM BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS: 14-1-3
YES: Berman, Ahrens, Alanis, Bains, Bauer-Kahan, Caloza, Elhawary, Wilson, Irwin, Jackson, Krell, Lowenthal, Nguyen, Pellerin
NO: Macedo
ABS, ABST OR NV: Flora, Chen, Hadwick
ASM APPROPRIATIONS: 11-4-0
YES: Wicks, Arambula, Calderon, Caloza, Elhawary, Fong, Mark González, Hart, Pacheco, Pellerin, Solache
NO: Sanchez, Dixon, Ta, Tangipa
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 61-11-7
YES: Addis, Aguiar-Curry, Ahrens, Alanis, Alvarez, Arambula, Ávila Farías, Bains, Bauer-Kahan, Bennett, Berman, Boerner, Bonta, Bryan, Calderon, Caloza, Carrillo, Connolly, Elhawary, Fong, Gabriel, Garcia, Gipson, Mark González, Haney, Harabedian, Hart, Irwin, Jackson, Kalra, Krell, Lee, Lowenthal, McKinnor, Muratsuchi, Nguyen, Ortega, Pacheco, Patel, Pellerin, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Ransom, Celeste Rodriguez, Michelle Rodriguez, Rogers, Blanca Rubio, Schiavo, Schultz, Sharp-Collins, Solache, Soria, Stefani, Valencia, Wallis, Ward, Wicks, Wilson, Zbur, Rivas
NO: Castillo, DeMaio, Ellis, Gallagher, Hadwick, Lackey, Macedo, Patterson, Sanchez, Ta, Tangipa
ABS, ABST OR NV: Chen, Davies, Dixon, Flora, Jeff Gonzalez, Hoover, Papan
UPDATED
VERSION: September 05, 2025
CONSULTANT: Lara Flynn / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097 FN: 0001855
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | AB 260 |
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 260
Author: Aguiar-Curry (D), et al.
Amended: 9/4/25 in Senate
Vote: 27 - Urgency
SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE: 6-1, 6/11/25
AYES: Menjivar, Durazo, Limón, Padilla, Richardson, Wiener
NOES: Grove
NO VOTE RECORDED: Valladares, Gonzalez, Rubio, Weber Pierson
SENATE BUS., PROF. & ECON. DEV. COMMITTEE: 8-2, 6/23/25
AYES: Ashby, Archuleta, Arreguín, Grayson, Menjivar, Smallwood-Cuevas, Umberg, Weber Pierson
NOES: Choi, Strickland
NO VOTE RECORDED: Niello
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 5-2, 8/29/25
AYES: Caballero, Cabaldon, Grayson, Richardson, Wahab
NOES: Seyarto, Dahle
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 61-11, 5/19/25 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Sexual and reproductive health care
SOURCE: Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine Access
Access Reproductive Justice
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Attorney General Rob Bonta
Black Women for Wellness Action Project
California State Treasurer Fiona Ma
California Latinas for Reproductive Justice
Essential Access Health
Hey Jane
Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis
National Health Law Program
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California
Reproductive Freedom for All
Training in Early Abortion for Comprehensive Healthcare
Unite for Reproductive & Gender Equity
DIGEST:
This bill (1) prohibits the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) from taking criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a clinic or health facility for engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs; (2) Permits CDPH to adopt regulations specific to medication abortion drugs, including exempting those drugs from certain requirements if the drugs are not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for abortion; (3) Prohibits a health plan contract or a group or individual health insurance policy that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, regardless of its FDA approval status; (4) Places various requirements on pharmacists related to prescribing and dispensing mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs; (5) Makes various changes to requirements specific to healing arts practitioners who are authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer certain drugs; (6) Deletes unconstitutional and obsolete provisions of existing law relating to criminal abortion penalties; (7) Contains an urgency clause that will make this bill effective upon enactment.
Senate Floor Amendments of 9/4/2025:
- Delete requirements on the Department of Health Care Services around the provision of reproductive health care through telehealth services;
- Incorporate changes made by AB 1503 (Berman) to avoid chaptering out conflicts in the event both bills are signed into law; and,
- Extend, from January 1, 2026 to January 1, 2027, exemption for heath care providers from liability for damages or civil or enforcement actions for failure to meet the requirements of AB 352 (Bauer-Kahan, Chapter 255, Statutes of 2023), if the provider is working diligently and in good faith to come into compliance.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- Establishes the Reproductive Privacy Act (RPA), which prohibits the state from denying or interfering with a woman’s right to choose or obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the woman. [Health and Safety Code (HSC) §123460, et seq.]
- Prohibits a person who aids or assists a pregnant person in exercising their rights under RPA from being subject to civil or criminal liability or penalty, or otherwise being deprived of their rights, based solely on their actions to aid or assist a pregnant person in exercising their rights under RPA with the pregnant person's voluntary consent. [HSC §123467]
- Provides for the licensure and regulation of clinics and health facilities (hospitals, acute psychiatric hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, intermediate care facilities, congregate living facilities, correctional treatment center nursing facilities, and hospice facilities) by CDPH. [HSC §1200 and §1250, et seq.]
- Establishes the Sherman Food, Drug and Cosmetics Law (Sherman Law), administered by CDPH, which regulates the packaging, labeling, and advertising of drugs and devices, including dietary supplements. [HSC §109875-§111929.4]
- Establishes the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) to regulate health plans under the Knox-Keene Health Care Services Plan Act of 1975; the California Department of Insurance (CDI) to regulate health and other insurers; the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to administer the Medi-Cal program. [HSC §1340, et seq., Insurance Code (INS) §106, et seq., and Welfare and Institutions Code (WIC) §14000, et seq.]
- Prohibits health plans and health insurers from terminating, discriminating against, or otherwise penalizing a provider based on a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or another disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is solely based on the application of another state’s law that interferes with a person’s right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California. [HSC §1375.61 and INS §10133.641]
- Permits DHCS to elect not to suspend a Medi-Cal provider who has a license, certificate, or other approval to provide health care suspended or revoked in another state if the revocation or suspension is based solely on conduct that is not deemed to be unprofessional conduct under California law. [WIC §14043.6(b)]
This bill:
- Prohibits CDPH from suspending or revoking a license, or otherwise taking disciplinary action against a clinic or health facility solely on the basis that it transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for lawful medication abortion.
Prohibits CDPH from denying an application for licensure, suspending or revoking a license, or otherwise imposing discipline upon a clinic or health facility solely because it is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for discipline.
- Prohibits a health plan contract or insurance policy that covers prescription drug benefits from being issued, amended, delivered, or renewed if it limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that: the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the FDA-approved use; or, that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation (REM) strategy, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
- Requires health plan contracts and insurance policies that cover prescription drug benefits to include coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, even if the drug has not been approved by the FDA for abortion, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone. Requires coverage, in the case that name brand or generic mifepristone has not been approved by the FDA for abortion, if the drug is a recognized medication for abortion by the World Health Organization (WHO) Model List of Essential Medicines, the WHO abortion care guideline, or the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine Consensus Study Report, or if the state approves its use based on peer-reviewed studies and prior approval of the drug that is no longer in effect.
- Prohibits a health plan or insurer from discriminating, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of this state. Additionally prohibits a health plan contract or insurance policy from containing any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal, or to otherwise penalize a provider, based on those activities.
- Permits CDPH to adopt regulations relating to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion by such drugs including those drugs within, or excluding those drugs from, the requirements the Sherman Law, whether or not it is in accordance with federal law.
- Prohibits the Sherman Law from applying to brand name or generic mifepristone in the event of a labeling change or in the absence of its FDA approval if it is recommended for use by the WHO and its labeling was true and accurate at the time of manufacture, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
Exempts, from certain labeling requirements in the Sherman Law, a brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device.
- Protects a healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs from a civil or criminal action or disciplinary or other administrative proceeding solely on the basis that the practitioner prescribed, furnished, ordered, or administered brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
- Declares that the authority of a healing arts practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion is the practice of medicine, and the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the ability of a practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion if that action is lawful under the laws of the state, are against the public policy of California.
- Prohibits healing arts boards from denying a license or taking disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state, including in circumstances where that protected activity resulted in criminal conviction or discipline in another state.
- Prohibits an individual or state or local officer from commencing a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
- Incorporates changes made by AB 1503 (Berman) to avoid chaptering out conflicts in the event both bills are signed into law.
- Extends, from January 1, 2026 to January 1, 2027, exemption for heath care providers from liability for damages or civil or enforcement actions for failure to meet the requirements of AB 352 (Bauer-Kahan, Chapter 255, Statutes of 2023), if the provider is working diligently and in good faith to come into compliance.
- Permits a pharmacist to dispense brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the prescriber or the name and address of the pharmacy otherwise required to be listed on the prescription label, if the label contains a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
- Requires a pharmacist who dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion to maintain a log with the prescription numbers and the information otherwise required to be listed on the prescription label; provides that these records shall not be open to inspection by law enforcement without a valid, court-issued subpoena but that the investigation of an activity that is punishable as a crime under the laws of California is not prohibited, provided that records are not shared with an individual or entity from another state.
- Requires a pharmacist to inform the patient that the pharmacist is dispensing a brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion under the labeling exemption.
Contains an urgency clause that will make this bill effective upon enactment.
Makes these provisions of this bill severable: if any provision or its application is held invalid, and prohibits that invalidity from affecting other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
- Deletes an unconstitutional Family Code provision prohibiting a minor from receiving an abortion without the consent of a parent or guardian.
- Repeals an obsolete Penal Code provision prohibiting a defendant on trial for procuring or attempting to procure an abortion, or aiding or assisting therein, or for inveigling, enticing, or taking away an unmarried female of previous chaste character, under 18 years, for the purpose of prostitution, or aiding or assisting therein, from being convicted upon the testimony of the woman upon, or with whom the offense was committed, unless she is corroborated by other evidence.
- Clarifies a Penal Code provision prohibiting a condition or restriction from being imposed upon an incarcerated person obtaining an abortion pursuant to the California Constitution and the RPA.
- Contains an urgency clause that will make this bill effective upon enactment.
Comments
According to the author of this bill:
For years, California has promoted access to reproductive health care without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers. However, recent lawsuits and actions by the federal government are exploring ways to limit states’ ability to provide medication abortion drugs, posing a threat to Californians’ constitutional right to reproductive freedom. This bill enhances access to medication abortion in California by protecting health care providers, facilities, and patients who access abortion medication, while also expanding overall access to reproductive health care. This bill ensures that the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, secured by the California Constitution, remains protected. When access to the fundamental right to health care is under attack across the nation, this bill proactively seeks to ensure that the existing standard of practice for medication abortion remains legal in California.
Background
Please see the June 11, 2025 Senate Health Committee and the June 23, 2025 Senate Business, Professions and Economic Development Committee analyses for background information.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: Yes
According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:
DHCS estimates the following related to Medi-Cal telehealth services:
One-time cost of $5 million (General Fund/federal funds) for system change updates to the Provider Application and Validation for Enrollment (PAVE) system during the first year of implementation to collect information regarding the specific services provided; and costs of $460,000 ($230,000 General Fund and $230,000 federal funds in 2026-27 and $433,000 ($217,000 General Fund and $216,000 federal funds) ongoing thereafter for staffing resources to process the new enrollment applications.
Staffing costs for increased workload due to an anticipated increased need for post-service audits, of $819,000 ($410,000 General Fund and $409,000 federal funds) in 2026-27, and $783,000 ($393,000 General Fund and $390,000 federal funds) ongoing thereafter.
The California State Board of Pharmacy and the California State Board of Naturopathic Medicine anticipate minor and absorbable fiscal impacts related to education of the bill’s provisions.
The Osteopathic Medical Board of California estimates additional enforcement workload costs of $25,015 per year, which would be absorbable.
CDPH estimates no fiscal impact because the bill does not change CDPH’s existing policies and practices regarding facility licensure.
DMHC anticipates minor and absorbable costs for state administration (Managed Care Fund).
Likely minor costs for CDI for state administration (Insurance Fund).
SUPPORT: (Verified 9/4/25)
Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine Access (co-source)
Access Reproductive Justice (co- source)
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (co- source)
Attorney General Rob Bonta (co- source)
Black Women for Wellness Action Project (co- source)
California State Treasurer Fiona Ma (co- source)
California Latinas for Reproductive Justice (co- source)
Essential Access Health (co- source)
Hey Jane (co- source)
Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis (co- source)
National Health Law Program (co- source)
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California (co- source)
Reproductive Freedom for All (co- source)
Training in Early Abortion for Comprehensive Healthcare (co- source)
Unite for Reproductive & Gender Equity (co- source)
American Association of University Women – California
California Academy of Family Physicians
California Medical Association
California Nurse Midwives Association
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network
California Pharmacists Association
California Women’s Law Center
California Women Lawyers
Citizens for Choice
County of Los Angeles
Equal Rights California
Equality California
Green Policy Initiative
Hadassah
JCC/Federation of San Luis Obispo
Jewish Democratic Club of Marin
Jewish Community Federation and Endowment Fund
Jewish Family & Children’s Services of San Francisco, the Peninsula, Marin & Sonoma Counties
Jewish Family & Community Services East Bay
Jewish Family Service LA
Jewish Family Service of San Diego
Jewish Family Services of Silicon Valley
Jewish Federation of the Greater San Gabriel and Pomona Valleys
Jewish Free Loan Association
Jewish Long Beach
Jewish Public Affairs Committee of California
JCRC Bay Area
JFCS Long Beach and Orange County
JVS SoCal
League of Women Voters of California
Osteopathic Medical Board of California
Parent Voices California
San Francisco Bay Area Black & Jewish Unity Coalition
Women’s Foundation California
Women’s Health Specialists
OPPOSITION: (Verified 9/4/25)
California Baptist for Biblical Values
California Family Council
Pacific Justice Institute – Center for Public Policy
One individual
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: Supporters write that medication abortion, and broad access to it, allows individuals to receive safe and effective abortion care in a least invasive manner. Any federal threats to restrict medication abortion and the drugs used are not only dangerous and risky, but also a direct attack on the state’s constitutional right to reproductive freedom. Mifepristone, a drug used in combination with a second drug – misoprostol – to terminate a pregnancy through medication abortion, was approved by the FDA in 2000. Accordingly, scientists have studied the safety of mifepristone for over 25 years, and these decades of evidence show that medication abortion and the drugs used in the process are safe and effective. President Trump’s appointees to lead the Health and Human Services Agency and the FDA have both made comments in their confirmation hearings about reevaluating mifepristone policies and its safety. With these vocalized, ongoing threats to eliminate legal protections and reduce access to medication abortion at the federal level, California must continue to lead in defending and safeguarding access to safe and accessible abortion care. This bill protects medication abortion by establishing that the current standard of care for the use of mifepristone will remain legal in this state, protecting providers that legally provide mifepristone, requiring the continuation of existing coverage for medication abortion, and expanding access to reproductive health care through telehealth. Proactively taking steps to protect care will help to ensure that there will not be an interruption of access to medication abortion care in California. When access to the fundamental right to health care is under attack across the nation, this bill proactively codifies the existing standard of practice for medication abortion so that it remains legal in California, regardless of federal actions. This bill reassures Californians that their rights to essential health care and bodily autonomy are – and will remain – protected.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: California Family Council writes that this bill recklessly removes the most basic safeguards from the dispensing of mifepristone, a drug that is extremely dangerous to women, especially without the originally required medical safeguards. California Baptist for Biblical Values state that this bill recklessly removes the most basic safeguards from the dispensing of mifepristone, a drug that is extremely dangerous to women, especially without the originally required medical safeguards. Pacific Justice Institute – Center for Public Policy states that the FDA has already loosened safety protocols over time, removing requirements for in-person physician visits, mandatory adverse event reporting, and restrictions on prescribing to only physicians. These deregulations have coincided with increased complications, as evidenced by an Ethics and Public Policy Center study. Expanding distribution further could exacerbate these harms by reducing oversight and access to immediate medical intervention for complications like severe bleeding or incomplete abortions, which often require surgical follow-up.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 61-11, 5/19/25
AYES: Addis, Aguiar-Curry, Ahrens, Alanis, Alvarez, Arambula, Ávila Farías, Bains, Bauer-Kahan, Bennett, Berman, Boerner, Bonta, Bryan, Calderon, Caloza, Carrillo, Connolly, Elhawary, Fong, Gabriel, Garcia, Gipson, Mark González, Haney, Harabedian, Hart, Irwin, Jackson, Kalra, Krell, Lee, Lowenthal, McKinnor, Muratsuchi, Nguyen, Ortega, Pacheco, Patel, Pellerin, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Ransom, Celeste Rodriguez, Michelle Rodriguez, Rogers, Blanca Rubio, Schiavo, Schultz, Sharp-Collins, Solache, Soria, Stefani, Valencia, Wallis, Ward, Wicks, Wilson, Zbur, Rivas
NOES: Castillo, DeMaio, Ellis, Gallagher, Hadwick, Lackey, Macedo, Patterson, Sanchez, Ta, Tangipa
NO VOTE RECORDED: Chen, Davies, Dixon, Flora, Jeff Gonzalez, Hoover, Papan
Prepared by: Melanie Moreno / HEALTH / (916) 651-4111
9/8/25 21:08:10
**** END ****
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | AB 260 |
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 260
Author: Aguiar-Curry (D), et al.
Amended: 6/18/25 in Senate
Vote: 27 - Urgency
SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE: 6-1, 6/11/25
AYES: Menjivar, Durazo, Limón, Padilla, Richardson, Wiener
NOES: Grove
NO VOTE RECORDED: Valladares, Gonzalez, Rubio, Weber Pierson
SENATE BUS., PROF. & ECON. DEV. COMMITTEE: 8-2, 6/23/25
AYES: Ashby, Archuleta, Arreguín, Grayson, Menjivar, Smallwood-Cuevas, Umberg, Weber Pierson
NOES: Choi, Strickland
NO VOTE RECORDED: Niello
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 5-2, 8/29/25
AYES: Caballero, Cabaldon, Grayson, Richardson, Wahab
NOES: Seyarto, Dahle
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 61-11, 5/19/25 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Sexual and reproductive health care
SOURCE: Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine Access
Access Reproductive Justice
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Attorney General Rob Bonta
Black Women for Wellness Action Project
California State Treasurer Fiona Ma
California Latinas for Reproductive Justice
Essential Access Health
Hey Jane
Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis
National Health Law Program
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California
Reproductive Freedom for All
Training in Early Abortion for Comprehensive Healthcare
Unite for Reproductive & Gender Equity
DIGEST:
This bill prohibits the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) from taking criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a clinic or health facility for engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs. Permits CDPH to adopt regulations specific to medication abortion drugs, including exempting those drugs from certain requirements if the drugs are not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for abortion. Prohibits a health plan contract or a group or individual health insurance policy that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, regardless of its FDA approval status. Requires the Department of Health Care Services to update provider enrollment requirements and procedures for providers who offer reproductive health care services exclusively through telehealth. Places various requirements on pharmacists related to prescribing and dispensing mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs. Makes various changes to requirements specific to healing arts practitioners who are authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer certain drugs. Deletes unconstitutional and obsolete provisions of existing law relating to criminal abortion penalties. Contains an urgency clause that will make this bill effective upon enactment.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- Establishes the Reproductive Privacy Act (RPA), which prohibits the state from denying or interfering with a woman’s right to choose or obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the woman. [HSC §123460, et seq.]
- Prohibits a person who aids or assists a pregnant person in exercising their rights under RPA from being subject to civil or criminal liability or penalty, or otherwise being deprived of their rights, based solely on their actions to aid or assist a pregnant person in exercising their rights under RPA with the pregnant person's voluntary consent. [HSC §123467]
- Provides for the licensure and regulation of clinics and health facilities (hospitals, acute psychiatric hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, intermediate care facilities, congregate living facilities, correctional treatment center nursing facilities, and hospice facilities) by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). [HSC §1200 and §1250, et seq.]
- Establishes the Sherman Food, Drug and Cosmetics Law (Sherman Law), administered by CDPH, which regulates the packaging, labeling, and advertising of drugs and devices, including dietary supplements. [HSC §109875-§111929.4]
- Establishes the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) to regulate health plans under the Knox-Keene Health Care Services Plan Act of 1975; the California Department of Insurance (CDI) to regulate health and other insurers; the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to administer the Medi-Cal program. [HSC §1340, et seq., INS §106, et seq., and WIC §14000, et seq.]
- Prohibits health plans and health insurers from terminating, discriminating against, or otherwise penalizing a provider based on a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or another disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is solely based on the application of another state’s law that interferes with a person’s right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California. [HSC §1375.61 and INS §10133.641]
- Permits DHCS to elect not to suspend a Medi-Cal provider who has a license, certificate, or other approval to provide health care suspended or revoked in another state if the revocation or suspension is based solely on conduct that is not deemed to be unprofessional conduct under California law. [WIC §14043.6(b)]
- Defines “telehealth” as the mode of delivering health care services and public health via information and communication technologies to facilitate the diagnosis, consultation, treatment, education, care management, and self-management of a patient’s health care. [BPC §2290.5]
- Prohibits Medi-Cal providers from establishing a new patient relationship with a Medi-Cal recipient via asynchronous store and forward, audio-only synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other virtual communication modalities except for visits provided by specified federally qualified health center or rural health center providers using asynchronous store and forward and audio-only synchronous interaction when services delivered through that interaction meet the applicable standard of care. [WIC §14132.725]
- Permits Medi-Cal providers to establish a new patient relationship via the use of audio-only synchronous interactions when the visit is related to sensitive services as defined in state law in accordance with DHCS-specific requirements and consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance. “Sensitive services” include all health care services related to mental or behavioral health, sexual and reproductive health, sexually transmitted infections, substance use disorder, gender affirming care, and intimate partner violence, HIV testing, including the related sensitive services that minors can consent to. [WIC §14132.725 and CIV §56.05]
- Permits Medi-Cal providers to establish a new patient relationship using an audio-only synchronous interaction when the patient requests an audio-only modality or attests they do not have access to video, and when established in accordance with DHCS-specific requirements and consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance. [WIC §14132.725]
This bill:
- Prohibits CDPH from suspending or revoking a license, or otherwise taking disciplinary action against a clinic or health facility solely on the basis that it transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for lawful medication abortion.
Prohibits CDPH from denying an application for licensure, suspending or revoking a license, or otherwise imposing discipline upon a clinic or health facility solely because it is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for discipline.
- Prohibits a health plan contract or insurance policy that covers prescription drug benefits from being issued, amended, delivered, or renewed if it limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that: the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the FDA-approved use; or, that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation (REM) strategy, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
- Requires health plan contracts and insurance policies that cover prescription drug benefits to include coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, even if the drug has not been approved by the FDA for abortion, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone. Requires coverage, in the case that name brand or generic mifepristone has not been approved by the FDA for abortion, if the drug is a recognized medication for abortion by the World Health Organization (WHO) Model List of Essential Medicines, the WHO abortion care guideline, or the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine Consensus Study Report, or if the state approves its use based on peer-reviewed studies and prior approval of the drug that is no longer in effect.
- Prohibits a health plan or insurer from discriminating, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of this state. Additionally prohibits a health plan contract or insurance policy from containing any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal, or to otherwise penalize a provider, based on those activities.
- Permits CDPH to adopt regulations relating to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion by such drugs including those drugs within, or excluding those drugs from, the requirements the Sherman Law, whether or not it is in accordance with federal law.
- Prohibits the Sherman Law from applying to brand name or generic mifepristone in the event of a labeling change or in the absence of its FDA approval if it is recommended for use by the WHO and its labeling was true and accurate at the time of manufacture, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
Exempts, from certain labeling requirements in the Sherman Law, a brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device.
- Requires DHCS to update the Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirement and procedures for remote service reproductive health care providers who offer services primarily through telehealth modalities seeking enrollment in the Medi-Cal program to report an “administrative location” as their service address. Exempts that location from the following established place of business requirements under existing law:
- Displays regular and permanently posted business hours;
- Being identifiable as a medical or health care provider or business by permanently attached signage that identifies the name of the provider or business as shown on the application; and,
- Obtaining and maintaining liability insurance coverage, which covers premises and operation, in an amount of at least $100,000 per claim, with a minimum annual aggregate of at least $300,000 from an authorized insurer.
- Requires DHCS to modify existing telehealth regulations to permit the use of a cellular telephone as the primary business phone for reproductive health care providers.
- Requires reproductive health remote service providers to meet current Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirements and standards.
- Permits a health care provider to establish a new patient relationship using asynchronous store and forward if the visit is related to reproductive health care services, if those services meet the applicable standard of care and can be appropriately delivered via the telehealth modalities, the patient requests an asynchronous store and forward modality, and the relationship is established in accordance with DHCS requirements and consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance.
- Protects a healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs from a civil or criminal action or disciplinary or other administrative proceeding solely on the basis that the practitioner prescribed, furnished, ordered, or administered brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
- Declares that the authority of a healing arts practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion is the practice of medicine, and the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the ability of a practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion if that action is lawful under the laws of the state, are against the public policy of California.
- Prohibits healing arts boards from denying a license or taking disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state, including in circumstances where that protected activity resulted in criminal conviction or discipline in another state.
- Prohibits an individual or state or local officer from commencing a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
- Permits a pharmacist to dispense brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the prescriber or the name and address of the pharmacy otherwise required to be listed on the prescription label, if the label contains a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
- Requires a pharmacist who dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion to maintain a log with the prescription numbers and the information otherwise required to be listed on the prescription label; provides that these records shall not be open to inspection by law enforcement without a valid, court-issued subpoena but that the investigation of an activity that is punishable as a crime under the laws of California is not prohibited, provided that records are not shared with an individual or entity from another state.
- Requires a pharmacist to inform the patient that the pharmacist is dispensing a brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion under the labeling exemption.
Contains an urgency clause that will make this bill effective upon enactment.
Makes these provisions of this bill severable: if any provision or its application is held invalid, and prohibits that invalidity from affecting other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
- Deletes an unconstitutional Family Code provision prohibiting a minor from receiving an abortion without the consent of a parent or guardian.
- Repeals an obsolete Penal Code provision prohibiting a defendant on trial for procuring or attempting to procure an abortion, or aiding or assisting therein, or for inveigling, enticing, or taking away an unmarried female of previous chaste character, under 18 years, for the purpose of prostitution, or aiding or assisting therein, from being convicted upon the testimony of the woman upon, or with whom the offense was committed, unless she is corroborated by other evidence.
- Clarifies a Penal Code provision prohibiting a condition or restriction from being imposed upon an incarcerated person obtaining an abortion pursuant to the California Constitution and the RPA.
Comments
According to the author of this bill:
For years, California has promoted access to reproductive health care without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers. However, recent lawsuits and actions by the federal government are exploring ways to limit states’ ability to provide medication abortion drugs, posing a threat to Californians’ constitutional right to reproductive freedom. This bill enhances access to medication abortion in California by protecting health care providers, facilities, and patients who access abortion medication, while also expanding overall access to reproductive health care. This bill ensures that the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, secured by the California Constitution, remains protected. When access to the fundamental right to health care is under attack across the nation, this bill proactively seeks to ensure that the existing standard of practice for medication abortion remains legal in California.
Background
Please see the June 11, 2025 Senate Health Committee and the June 23, 2025 Senate Business, Professions and Economic Development Committee analyses for background information.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: Yes
According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:
DHCS estimates the following related to Medi-Cal telehealth services:
One-time cost of $5 million (General Fund/federal funds) for system change updates to the Provider Application and Validation for Enrollment (PAVE) system during the first year of implementation to collect information regarding the specific services provided; and costs of $460,000 ($230,000 General Fund and $230,000 federal funds in 2026-27 and $433,000 ($217,000 General Fund and $216,000 federal funds) ongoing thereafter for staffing resources to process the new enrollment applications.
Staffing costs for increased workload due to an anticipated increased need for post-service audits, of $819,000 ($410,000 General Fund and $409,000 federal funds) in 2026-27, and $783,000 ($393,000 General Fund and $390,000 federal funds) ongoing thereafter.
The California State Board of Pharmacy and the California State Board of Naturopathic Medicine anticipate minor and absorbable fiscal impacts related to education of the bill’s provisions.
The Osteopathic Medical Board of California estimates additional enforcement workload costs of $25,015 per year, which would be absorbable.
CDPH estimates no fiscal impact because the bill does not change CDPH’s existing policies and practices regarding facility licensure.
DMHC anticipates minor and absorbable costs for state administration (Managed Care Fund).
Likely minor costs for CDI for state administration (Insurance Fund).
SUPPORT: (Verified 8/29/25)
Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine Access (co-source)
Access Reproductive Justice (co- source)
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (co- source)
Attorney General Rob Bonta (co- source)
Black Women for Wellness Action Project (co- source)
California State Treasurer Fiona Ma (co- source)
California Latinas for Reproductive Justice (co- source)
Essential Access Health (co- source)
Hey Jane (co- source)
Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis (co- source)
National Health Law Program (co- source)
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California (co- source)
Reproductive Freedom for All (co- source)
Training in Early Abortion for Comprehensive Healthcare (co- source)
Unite for Reproductive & Gender Equity (co- source)
American Association of University Women – California
California Academy of Family Physicians
California Medical Association
California Nurse Midwives Association
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network
California Pharmacists Association
California Women’s Law Center
California Women Lawyers
Citizens for Choice
County of Los Angeles
Equal Rights California
Equality California
Green Policy Initiative
Hadassah
JCC/Federation of San Luis Obispo
Jewish Democratic Club of Marin
Jewish Community Federation and Endowment Fund
Jewish Family & Children’s Services of San Francisco, the Peninsula, Marin & Sonoma Counties
Jewish Family & Community Services East Bay
Jewish Family Service LA
Jewish Family Service of San Diego
Jewish Family Services of Silicon Valley
Jewish Federation of the Greater San Gabriel and Pomona Valleys
Jewish Free Loan Association
Jewish Long Beach
Jewish Public Affairs Committee of California
JCRC Bay Area
JFCS Long Beach and Orange County
JVS SoCal
League of Women Voters of California
Osteopathic Medical Board of California
Parent Voices California
San Francisco Bay Area Black & Jewish Unity Coalition
Women’s Foundation California
Women’s Health Specialists
OPPOSITION: (Verified 8/29/25)
California Baptist for Biblical Values
California Family Council
Pacific Justice Institute – Center for Public Policy
One individual
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: Supporters write that medication abortion, and broad access to it, allows individuals to receive safe and effective abortion care in a least invasive manner. Any federal threats to restrict medication abortion and the drugs used are not only dangerous and risky, but also a direct attack on the state’s constitutional right to reproductive freedom. Mifepristone, a drug used in combination with a second drug – misoprostol – to terminate a pregnancy through medication abortion, was approved by the FDA in 2000. Accordingly, scientists have studied the safety of mifepristone for over 25 years, and these decades of evidence show that medication abortion and the drugs used in the process are safe and effective. President Trump’s appointees to lead the Health and Human Services Agency and the FDA have both made comments in their confirmation hearings about reevaluating mifepristone policies and its safety. With these vocalized, ongoing threats to eliminate legal protections and reduce access to medication abortion at the federal level, California must continue to lead in defending and safeguarding access to safe and accessible abortion care. This bill protects medication abortion by establishing that the current standard of care for the use of mifepristone will remain legal in this state, protecting providers that legally provide mifepristone, requiring the continuation of existing coverage for medication abortion, and expanding access to reproductive health care through telehealth. Proactively taking steps to protect care will help to ensure that there will not be an interruption of access to medication abortion care in California. When access to the fundamental right to health care is under attack across the nation, this bill proactively codifies the existing standard of practice for medication abortion so that it remains legal in California, regardless of federal actions. This bill reassures Californians that their rights to essential health care and bodily autonomy are – and will remain – protected.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: California Family Council writes that this bill recklessly removes the most basic safeguards from the dispensing of mifepristone, a drug that is extremely dangerous to women, especially without the originally required medical safeguards. California Baptist for Biblical Values state that this bill recklessly removes the most basic safeguards from the dispensing of mifepristone, a drug that is extremely dangerous to women, especially without the originally required medical safeguards. Pacific Justice Institute – Center for Public Policy states that the FDA has already loosened safety protocols over time, removing requirements for in-person physician visits, mandatory adverse event reporting, and restrictions on prescribing to only physicians. These deregulations have coincided with increased complications, as evidenced by an Ethics and Public Policy Center study. Expanding distribution further could exacerbate these harms by reducing oversight and access to immediate medical intervention for complications like severe bleeding or incomplete abortions, which often require surgical follow-up.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 61-11, 5/19/25
AYES: Addis, Aguiar-Curry, Ahrens, Alanis, Alvarez, Arambula, Ávila Farías, Bains, Bauer-Kahan, Bennett, Berman, Boerner, Bonta, Bryan, Calderon, Caloza, Carrillo, Connolly, Elhawary, Fong, Gabriel, Garcia, Gipson, Mark González, Haney, Harabedian, Hart, Irwin, Jackson, Kalra, Krell, Lee, Lowenthal, McKinnor, Muratsuchi, Nguyen, Ortega, Pacheco, Patel, Pellerin, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Ransom, Celeste Rodriguez, Michelle Rodriguez, Rogers, Blanca Rubio, Schiavo, Schultz, Sharp-Collins, Solache, Soria, Stefani, Valencia, Wallis, Ward, Wicks, Wilson, Zbur, Rivas
NOES: Castillo, DeMaio, Ellis, Gallagher, Hadwick, Lackey, Macedo, Patterson, Sanchez, Ta, Tangipa
NO VOTE RECORDED: Chen, Davies, Dixon, Flora, Jeff Gonzalez, Hoover, Papan
Prepared by: Melanie Moreno / HEALTH / (916) 651-4111
8/29/25 20:27:50
**** END ****
SENATE COMMITTEE ON
BUSINESS, PROFESSIONS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Senator Angelique Ashby, Chair
2025 - 2026 Regular
Bill No: AB 260 Hearing Date: June 23, 2025
Author: | Aguiar-Curry | ||
Version: |
| ||
Urgency: | Fiscal: | ||
Consultant: | |||
Subject: Sexual and reproductive health care
SUMMARY:
An urgency measure that prohibits licensed health care providers from being subject to specified disciplinary and other actions for prescribing, furnishing, ordering, or administering mifepristone and other medication abortion drugs; authorizes a pharmacist to dispense those drugs without the name of the prescriber or the name and address of the pharmacy on the prescription label, subject to certain requirements; and makes additional technical and conforming changes to recognize the constitutional right to receive abortion care in California; prohibits the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) from taking specified disciplinary and other action against a clinic or health facility for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs; prohibits a health plan contract or a group or individual health insurance policy that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, regardless of its FDA approval status; requires the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to update provider enrollment requirements and procedures for providers who offer reproductive health care services exclusively through telehealth.
NOTE: This measure was heard in the Senate Committee on Health on June 11 and passed by a vote of 6-1.
Existing law:
- Establishes various practice acts in the Business and Professions Code (BPC) governed by various boards within the Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) which provide for the licensing and regulation of health care professionals including: physicians and surgeons (under the Medical Practice Act); osteopathic physicians and surgeons (under the Osteopathic Medical Practice Act); nurse practitioners (NPs) and certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) (under the Nursing Practice Act); and physician assistants (PA) (under the Physician Assistant Practice Act). (Business and Professions Code (BPC) §§ 2000 et seq.; 2099.5 et seq.; 2700 et seq.; 3500 et seq.)
- Establishes the Reproductive Privacy Act, which finds and declares that every individual possesses a fundamental right of privacy with respect to personal reproductive decisions, and states that it is the public policy of the State of California that:
- Every individual has the fundamental right to choose or refuse birth control;
- Every woman has the fundamental right to choose to bear a child or to choose and to obtain an abortion, except as specifically limited by law; and,
- The state cannot deny or interfere with a woman’s fundamental right to choose to bear a child or to choose to obtain an abortion, except as specifically permitted by law. (Health and Safety Code (HSC) § 123462)
- Defines “abortion” for purposes of the Reproductive Privacy Act as any medical treatment intended to induce the termination of a pregnancy except for the purpose of producing a live birth. (HSC § 123464)
- Provides that the State may not deny or interfere with a woman's right to choose or obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the woman. (HSC § 123466)
- Prohibits specified health care professional licensing boards from denying an application for licensure or suspending or revoking a license solely because the licensee performed an abortion in accordance with the Reproductive Privacy Act and their respective practice act, including abortions performed in other states that have banned or restricted abortion. (BPC § 2253)
- Prohibits a licensed health facility from denying, removing, or restricting the staff privileges of a licensee of a healing arts board on the basis of a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or disciplinary action in another state that was based solely on the application of another state’s law that interferes with a person’s right to receive sensitive services, including sexual and reproductive health care, that would be lawful in California. (BPC § 805.9)
- Prohibits health care professional licensing boards from denying an application for licensure or disciplining a licensee on the basis of a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or disciplinary action in another state that was based solely on the application of another state’s law that interferes with a person’s right to receive sensitive services, including sexual and reproductive health care, that would be lawful in California, regardless of the patient’s location. (BPC § 850.1)
- Requires The MBC, OMBC, Physician Assistant Board (PAB), and Board of Registered Nursing (BRN) to expedite the licensure process for an applicant who demonstrates that they intend to provide abortions within the scope of practice of their license. (BPC § 870)
- Requires pharmacists to dispense prescriptions in containers that are labeled with specified information, including the trade name or generic name of the drug, the directions for use of the drug, the name of the patient or patients, the name of the prescriber, the date of issue, and the name and address of the pharmacy, among other required information. (BPC § 4076)
- Prohibits health plans and health insurers from terminating, discriminating against, or otherwise penalizing a provider based on a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or another disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is solely based on the application of another state’s law that interferes with a person’s right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California. (HSC §1375.61 and Insurance Code §10133.641)
This bill:
- Provides that a licensed health care professional who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs shall not be subject to a civil or criminal action or disciplinary or other administrative proceeding solely on the basis that the practitioner prescribed, furnished, ordered, or administered brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion. Specifies that the authority of a licensed health care professional to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion is the practice of medicine, and the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the ability of a practitioner to do so are against the public policy of this state.
- Prohibits an individual or state or local officer from commencing a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against an individual licensed or certified by a heath care professional licensing board and prohibits a health care professional licensing board from suspending or revoking a license or otherwise taking disciplinary action and; concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state. Prohibits a health care professional licensing board from denying an application for licensure, or suspend a license, revoke a license, or otherwise impose discipline upon a licensee or health care practitioner solely because the licensee or practitioner was convicted or disciplined in another state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
- Repeals provisions of current law found unconstitutional and deletes obsolete references to criminal abortion penalties, and makes technical changes to provisions authorizing abortion for incarcerated and committed persons.
- Authorizes a pharmacist to, at their discretion, dispense brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the patient, the name of the prescriber, or the name and address of the pharmacy if the prescription is labeled with a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription. Requires a pharmacist who dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion to maintain a log with the prescription numbers and specified information and specifies these records shall not be open to inspection by law enforcement without a valid, court-issued subpoena. Specifies that these provisions do not prohibit the investigation of an activity that is punishable as a crime under the laws of this state, provided that records are not shared with an individual or entity from another state.
- Prohibits CDPH from suspending or revoking a license, or otherwise taking disciplinary action against a clinic or health facility solely on the basis that it manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for lawful medication abortion. Prohibits CDPH from denying an application for licensure, suspending or revoking a license, or otherwise imposing discipline upon a clinic or health facility solely because it is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
- Prohibits a health plan contract or insurance policy that covers prescription drug benefits from being issued, amended, delivered, or renewed if it limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that: the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the FDA-approved use; or, that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone. Prohibits a health plan contract or insurance policy that covers prescription drug benefits from being issued, amended, delivered, or renewed if it limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone regardless of its FDA approval status, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone. Prohibits a health plan or insurer from discriminating, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of this state. Additionally prohibits a health plan contract or insurance policy from containing any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal, or to otherwise penalize a provider, based on those activities.
- Require DHCS to update provider enrollment requirements and procedures for remote service providers who offer reproductive health care services exclusively thorough telehealth modalities.
- Prohibits a health care service plan contract or a group or individual disability insurance policy that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, regardless of its FDA approval status.
- Makes findings and declarations about the longstanding public policy of this state to promote access to reproductive health care, including abortion care, without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers. States that every pregnant individual has the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, a right that is secured by the California Constitution. Cites recent federal action and litigation that has raised uncertainty about the continued availability nationwide of mifepristone, a drug that has been clinically proven to be part of a safe and effective means of providing medication abortion. States that the continued attacks on reproductive freedom across the country require immediate action to protect the right to abortion access, including access to medication abortion, in California. States that the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the United States Supreme Court have long recognized states’ police powers and that “direct control of medical practice in the states is beyond the power of federal government”. States Legislative intent to ensure continued access to medication abortion that has been proven safe and effective for two decades in California for individuals seeking abortion care.
- States that the bill is necessary to take effect immediately in order to ensure continued access to medication abortion that has been proven safe and effective.
FISCAL EFFECT:
This bill is keyed fiscal by Legislative Counsel. According to the Assembly Committee on Appropriations, the Osteopathic Medical Board of California estimates this bill would result in five additional enforcement cases per year, at an ongoing cost of $25,015 per year, which would be absorbable. The California State Board of Pharmacy anticipates minor and absorbable costs to provide education about the law. The bill will also result in minor and absorbable costs to the Department of Managed Health Care and costs of an unknown, but likely absorbable, amount to DHCS and CDPH.
COMMENTS:
- Purpose. This bill is sponsored by: Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California; ACCESS RJ; Attorney General Rob Bonta; Black Women for Wellness Action Project; California Latinas for Reproductive Justice; Essential Access Health; National Health Law Program; Reproductive Freedom for All; TEACH; URGE; Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Hey Jane and; Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine.
According to the Author, “For years, California has promoted access to reproductive health care without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers. However, recent lawsuits and actions by the federal government are exploring ways to limit states’ ability to provide medication abortion drugs, posing a threat to Californians’ constitutional right to reproductive freedom. AB 260 enhances access to medication abortion in California by protecting health care providers, facilities, and patients who access abortion medication, while also expanding overall access to reproductive health care. This bill ensures that the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, secured by the California Constitution, remains protected. When access to the fundamental right to health care is under attack across the nation, this bill proactively seeks to ensure that the existing standard of practice for medication abortion remains legal in California.”
The Author notes that existing law states that every pregnant individual in California has the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, a right guaranteed the California Constitution and supported by other state laws protecting access to sexual and reproductive health care in the state. However, at the federal level, there is uncertainty about the continued access of abortion care, specifically as it relates to mifepristone, a drug used for medication abortion. Since taking office, the Trump Administration has taken action to restrict access to reproductive and sexual health care and vocalized that additional steps are imminent, rolling back existing protections and advancements, access, and equity achieved for patients, providers, and health facilities.
In the first week of the Administration, President Trump signed an Executive Order directing agencies to review programs and calling for more stringent enforcement of the Hyde Amendment. Notably, the order indicates an intent to expand the reach of the Hyde Amendment, by further restricting not just the funding but also the “promotion” of abortion access, even in access states like California.
Additionally, despite years of research, the U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. stated just a couple of weeks ago that he was going to order the review of mifepristone following the release of a flawed study on the impacts of the drug. Similarly, the nominee for U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA) administrator, Martin Makary, made no commitment to maintain current mifepristone policies in his confirmation hearing earlier this year.
The threats at the federal level have also come with lawsuits against doctors prescribing mifepristone in blue states. According to this article, a doctor in New York was sued for mailing medication abortion to patients in Louisiana and Texas, two states in which abortion is heavily restricted. This bill seeks to mitigate the harm that could be caused if states can sue a doctor for dispensing or prescribing mifepristone by allowing them to keep their information off of the prescription labeling. This policy has already been signed into law in New York.
- Background. The Reproductive Privacy Act codified the constitutional principles of Roe v. Wade and replaced in its entirety the Therapeutic Abortion Act. In 1967, Governor Ronald Reagan signed the Therapeutic Abortion Act, which expanded legal abortion in California under very restrictive criteria. Most of those restrictions were subsequently ruled unconstitutional in the 1972 California Supreme Court case, People v. Barksdale (1972) 8 Cal.3d 320, 105 Cal.Rptr 1. The United States Supreme Court (Court) issued its landmark Roe v. Wade (1973) 410 U.S. 959, 35 L.Ed.2d 694, and Doe v. Bolton, decisions in 1973, which invalidated two of the three remaining provisions of the Therapeutic Abortion Act.
Although Roe and Barksdale rendered much of the Therapeutic Abortion Act obsolete, the Therapeutic Abortion Act itself was not repealed by the Legislature until 2003, pursuant to SB 1301 (Kuehl, Chapter 385, Statutes of 2002) the Reproductive Privacy Act. One rationale for the passage of this Act was the concern that the Court may overturn Roe v. Wade, and it would, therefore, be important to have a state law which would protect reproductive rights in the State of California. The Reproductive Privacy Act expressly granted every woman in California with the fundamental right to choose to bear a child or to choose to obtain an abortion. Under the Reproductive Privacy Act, the state may not deny or interfere with a woman’s right to choose or obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the woman.
In 2021, the Texas Legislature passed Senate Bill 8, which criminalized abortion after the detection of embryonic or fetal cardiac activity, essentially banning abortion after approximately six weeks. The constitutionality of the law was challenged in Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson, which sought to enforce the Roe precedent and overturn Senate Bill 8. However, the Court declined to enjoin the law, which many pro-choice advocates viewed as portending a future decision by the Court to overturn or severely diminish the constitutional rights guaranteed under Roe.
Subsequently, on December 1, 2021, the Court heard oral arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a case regarding a 2018 law in the State of Mississippi that banned abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy. Dobbs was a direct challenge to the legal precedents set in Roe and Casey and was the first time the Court ruled on the constitutional right to pre-viability abortion since Roe. On June 24, 2022, the Court published its ruling that abortion is not a right protected under the Constitution of the United States. This decision effectively overturned Roe and left the question of whether to ban abortion and other forms of reproductive care up to individual states.
Immediately following the Court’s decision, State Senate President pro Tempore Toni Atkins sponsored Senate Constitutional Amendment 10, which placed a proposition on the 2022 ballot titled Constitutional Right to Reproductive Freedom. Proposition 1 explicitly made abortion and access to contraceptives a constitutional right in California. The ballot proposition passed with over 66 percent of voters in favor, formally enshrining the protections of Roe into the state’s constitution and securing essential reproductive rights for pregnant people in California.
Several states have attempted to impose their abortion laws on their residents even when the services are performed in states that have remained consistent with the protections of Roe. The legislatures in Arkansas, South Carolina, Texas, Ohio, Missouri, and Alabama, for example, have all proposed or enacted laws to criminalize residents seeking or assisting those seeking abortions out-of-state. These state laws are arguably unconstitutional; in 2023, the United States Department of Justice filed a statement of interest in two consolidated lawsuits seeking to protect the right to interstate travel, including the right to travel to another state to obtain an abortion that is legal in the destination state. On the day that the Dobbs decision was officially published, the governors of California, Oregon and Washington announced a “Multi-State Commitment to defend access to reproductive health care, including abortion and contraceptives, and committed to protecting patients and doctors against efforts by other states to export their abortion bans to our states.”
According to a March 2024 Kaiser Family Foundation factsheet, medication abortion is a pregnancy termination protocol that involves taking two different drugs approved for use up to the first 10 weeks of pregnancy by the FDA. The World Health Organization has authorized use up to 12 weeks of pregnancy. Since the FDA first approved the drug in 2000, its use in the U.S. has grown. In 2023, 63% of abortions in the U.S. were medication abortions. The most common medication abortion regimen involves the use of two different medications: mifepristone and misoprostol. Mifepristone, also known as the abortion pill or RU-486, is sold under the brand name Mifeprex and through a generic manufactured by GenBioPro. Mifepristone works by blocking progesterone, a hormone essential to the development of a pregnancy, and prevents an existing pregnancy from progressing. Misoprostol, taken 24 to 48 hours after mifepristone, works to empty the uterus by causing cramping and bleeding, similar to an early miscarriage. A follow-up visit can be scheduled a week or two later to confirm that the pregnancy was terminated via ultrasound or blood test. The FDA has found that medication abortion is a safe and highly effective method of pregnancy termination. Medication abortion successfully terminates the pregnancy 99.6% of the time, with a 0.4% risk of major complications, and a mortality rate of 0.00064%. Telehealth can be used to expand access to abortion services in areas where the number of clinicians who provide that care is limited. Many patients, particularly those who live in rural communities, must travel long distances to obtain abortion services even in states where abortion is still permitted. Because the updated FDA label now allows for telehealth, mifepristone has emerged as an option for patients who are either unable to travel to clinic or for other reasons wish to have an abortion in the privacy of their own home. As part of efforts to limit abortion access, some states have taken action to block the use of telehealth for abortion. Among the states that have not banned abortion, 13 have at least one restriction that requires at least one trip to the clinic, and effectively ban telehealth for medication abortion.
- Arguments in Support. Supporters write that medication abortion, and broad access to it, allows individuals to receive safe and effective abortion care in a least invasive manner. Any federal threats to restrict medication abortion and the drugs used are not only dangerous and risky, but also a direct attack on the state’s constitutional right to reproductive freedom. Mifepristone, a drug used in combination with a second drug – misoprostol – to terminate a pregnancy through medication abortion, was approved by the FDA in 2000. Accordingly, scientists have studied the safety of mifepristone for over 25 years, and these decades of evidence show that medication abortion and the drugs used in the process are safe and effective. President Trump’s appointees to lead the Health and Human Services Agency and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have both made comments in their confirmation hearings about reevaluating mifepristone policies and its safety. With these vocalized, ongoing threats to eliminate legal protections and reduce access to medication abortion at the federal level, California must continue to lead in defending and safeguarding access to safe and accessible abortion care.
According to supporters, when access to the fundamental right to health care is under attack across the nation, this bill proactively codifies the existing standard of practice for medication abortion so that it remains legal in California, regardless of federal actions. AB 260 reassures Californians that their rights to essential health care and bodily autonomy are – and will remain – protected. It is for these reasons that we are proud to co-sponsor this legislation.
- Arguments in Opposition. California Family Council writes that over 10% of women who take mifepristone suffer serious complications such as sepsis, hemorrhaging, infection, or other dangerous adverse events within 45 days after the abortion. That’s 22 times higher than the rate advertised based on clinical trials. This was revealed by a study published by the Ethics and Public Policy Center in April which is the largest-ever analysis of abortion pill outcomes. Part of the reason that the abortion pill is so much more dangerous today than the clinical trials showed decades ago is that necessary safeguards have since been discarded. Women originally needed a physical exam from their doctor to check for dangerous conditions, had to report complications, and needed follow-up care. At a time when women are lied to about mifepristone’s safety and are already suffering because crucial safeguards have been abandoned, AB 260 shields reckless practices and removes any last shred of oversight, precaution, or transparency.
Pacific Justice Institute - Center for Public Policy asks that members support measures that reinstate stronger safety protocols for mifepristone, such as requiring in-person physician oversight, mandatory adverse event reporting, and limiting prescriptions to the first seven weeks of pregnancy, as originally mandated by the FDA. The organization states these steps would better protect women from the documented risks of mifepristone while honoring the value of unborn life.
SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION:
Support:
Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine Access
Access Reproductive Justice
American Association of University Women, California
American Association of University Women, San Jose Branch
American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists - District Ix
Attorney General Rob Bonta
Black Women for Wellness Action Project
California Academy of Family Physicians
California Latinas for Reproductive Justice
California Medical Association
California Nurse Midwives Association
California Pan - Ethnic Health Network
California Pharmacists Association
California State Treasurer
California State Treasurer Fiona Ma
California Women's Law Center
Citizens for Choice
County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors
Equal Rights Advocates
Equality California
Essential Access Health
Green Policy Initiative
Hey Jane
Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis
National Health Law Program
Osteopathic Medical Board of California
Parent Voices California
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California
Reproductive Freedom for All
San Francisco Bay Area Black & Jewish Unity Coalition
Training in Early Abortion for Comprehensive Healthcare (TEACH)
Urge
Women's Health Specialists
Opposition:
California Family Council
Pacific Justice Institute - Center for Public Policy
-- END --
SENATE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH
Senator Caroline Menjivar, Chair
BILL NO: AB 260
AUTHOR: | Aguiar-Curry | ||
VERSION: | June 2, 2025 | ||
HEARING DATE: | June 11, 2025 | ||
CONSULTANT: | Melanie Moreno | ||
SUBJECT: Sexual and reproductive health care
SUMMARY:
Prohibits the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) from taking criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a clinic or health facility for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs. Permits CDPH to adopt regulations specific to medication abortion drugs, including exempting those drugs from certain requirements if the drugs are no longer approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Prohibits a health plan contract or a group or individual health insurance policy that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, regardless of its FDA approval status. Requires the Department of Health Care Services to update provider enrollment requirements and procedures for providers who offer reproductive health care services exclusively through telehealth. Places various requirements on pharmacists related to prescribing and dispensing mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs. Makes various changes to requirements specific to healing arts practitioners who are authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer certain drugs. Deletes unconstitutional and obsolete provisions of existing law relating to criminal abortion penalties.
Existing law:
- Establishes the Reproductive Privacy Act (RPA), which prohibits the state from denying or interfering with a woman’s right to choose or obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the woman. [HSC §123460, et seq.]
- Prohibits a person who aids or assists a pregnant person in exercising their rights under RPA from being subject to civil or criminal liability or penalty, or otherwise being deprived of their rights, based solely on their actions to aid or assist a pregnant person in exercising their rights under RPA with the pregnant person's voluntary consent. [HSC §123467]
- Provides for the licensure and regulation of clinics and health facilities (hospitals, acute psychiatric hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, intermediate care facilities, congregate living facilities, correctional treatment center nursing facilities, and hospice facilities) by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). [HSC §1200 and §1250, et seq.]
- Establishes the Sherman Food, Drug and Cosmetics Law (Sherman Law), administered by CDPH, which regulates the packaging, labeling, and advertising of drugs and devices, including dietary supplements. [HSC §109875-§111929.4]
- Establishes the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) to regulate health plans under the Knox-Keene Health Care Services Plan Act of 1975; the California Department of Insurance (CDI) to regulate health and other insurers; the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to administer the Medi-Cal program. [HSC §1340, et seq., INS §106, et seq., and WIC §14000, et seq.]
- Prohibits health plans and health insurers from terminating, discriminating against, or otherwise penalizing a provider based on a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or another disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is solely based on the application of another state’s law that interferes with a person’s right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California. [HSC §1375.61 and INS §10133.641]
- Permits DHCS to elect not to suspend a Medi-Cal provider who has a license, certificate, or other approval to provide health care suspended or revoked in another state if the revocation or suspension is based solely on conduct that is not deemed to be unprofessional conduct under California law. [WIC §14043.6(b)]
- Defines “telehealth” as the mode of delivering health care services and public health via information and communication technologies to facilitate the diagnosis, consultation, treatment, education, care management, and self-management of a patient’s health care. [BPC §2290.5]
- Prohibits Medi-Cal providers from establishing a new patient relationship with a Medi-Cal recipient via asynchronous store and forward, audio-only synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other virtual communication modalities except for visits provided by specified federally qualified health center or rural health center providers using asynchronous store and forward and audio-only synchronous interaction when services delivered through that interaction meet the applicable standard of care. [WIC §14132.725]
- Permits Medi-Cal providers to establish a new patient relationship via the use of audio-only synchronous interactions when the visit is related to sensitive services as defined in state law in accordance with DHCS-specific requirements and consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance. “Sensitive services” include all health care services related to mental or behavioral health, sexual and reproductive health, sexually transmitted infections, substance use disorder, gender affirming care, and intimate partner violence, HIV testing, including the related sensitive services that minors can consent to. [WIC §14132.725 and CIV §56.05]
- Permits Medi-Cal providers to establish a new patient relationship using an audio-only synchronous interaction when the patient requests an audio-only modality or attests they do not have access to video, and when established in accordance with DHCS-specific requirements and consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance. [WIC §14132.725]
This bill:
Clinics and health facilities
- Prohibits CDPH from suspending or revoking a license, or otherwise taking disciplinary action against a clinic or health facility solely on the basis that it manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for lawful medication abortion.
Prohibits CDPH from denying an application for licensure, suspending or revoking a license, or otherwise imposing discipline upon a clinic or health facility solely because it is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
Makes these provisions of this bill severable: if any provision or its application is held invalid, and prohibits that invalidity from affecting other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
Health plans and insurers
- Prohibits a health plan contract or insurance policy that covers prescription drug benefits from being issued, amended, delivered, or renewed if it limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that: the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the FDA-approved use; or, that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation (REM) strategy, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
- Prohibits a health plan contract or insurance policy that covers prescription drug benefits from being issued, amended, delivered, or renewed if it limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone regardless of its FDA approval status, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
- Prohibits a health plan or insurer from discriminating, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of this state. Additionally prohibits a health plan contract or insurance policy from containing any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal, or to otherwise penalize a provider, based on those activities.
Regulation of medication abortion drugs
- Permits CDPH to adopt regulations relating to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion by such drugs including those drugs within, or excluding those drugs from, the requirements the Sherman Law, whether or not it is in accordance with federal law.
- Prohibits the Sherman Law from applying to brand name or generic mifepristone in the event of a labeling change or in the absence of its FDA approval, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
Makes these two provisions of this bill severable: if any provision or its application is held invalid, and prohibits that invalidity from affecting other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
Exempts, from certain labeling requirements in the Sherman Law, a brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device.
Medi-Cal
- Requires DHCS to update the Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirement and procedures for remote service reproductive health care providers who offer services exclusively through telehealth modalities seeking enrollment in the Medi-Cal program to report an “administrative location” as their service address. Exempts that location from the following established place of business requirements under existing law:
- Displays regular and permanently posted business hours;
- Being identifiable as a medical or health care provider or business by permanently attached signage that identifies the name of the provider or business as shown on the application; and,
- Obtaining and maintaining liability insurance coverage, which covers premises and operation, in an amount of at least $100,000 per claim, with a minimum annual aggregate of at least $300,000 from an authorized insurer.
- Requires DHCS to modify existing telehealth regulations to permit the use of a cellular telephone as the primary business phone for reproductive health care providers.
- Requires reproductive health remote service providers to meet current Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirements and standards.
- Permits a health care provider to establish a new patient relationship using asynchronous store and forward if the visit is related to reproductive health care services, if those services meet the applicable standard of care and can be appropriately delivered via the telehealth modalities, the patient requests an asynchronous store and forward modality, and the relationship is established in accordance with DHCS requirements and consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance.
Business and Professions Code provisions
- Protects a healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs from a civil or criminal action or disciplinary or other administrative proceeding solely on the basis that the practitioner prescribed, furnished, ordered, or administered brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
- Declares that the authority of a healing arts practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion is the practice of medicine, and the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the ability of a practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion if that action is lawful under the laws of the state, are against the public policy of California.
- Prohibits healing arts boards from denying a license or taking disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state, including in circumstances where that protected activity resulted in criminal conviction or discipline in another state.
- Prohibits an individual or state or local officer from commencing a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
- Permits a pharmacist to dispense brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the prescriber or the name and address of the pharmacy otherwise required to be listed on the prescription label, if the label contains a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
- Requires a pharmacist who dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion to maintain a log with the prescription numbers and the information otherwise required to be listed on the prescription label; provides that these records shall not be open to inspection by law enforcement without a valid, court-issued subpoena but that the investigation of an activity that is punishable as a crime under the laws of California is not prohibited, provided that records are not shared with an individual or entity from another state.
- Requires a pharmacist to inform the patient that the pharmacist is dispensing a brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion under the labeling exemption.
Removal of obsolete code and other clarifying changes
- Deletes an unconstitutional Family Code provision prohibiting a minor from receiving an abortion without the consent of a parent or guardian.
- Repeals an obsolete Penal Code provision prohibiting a defendant on trial for procuring or attempting to procure an abortion, or aiding or assisting therein, or for inveigling, enticing, or taking away an unmarried female of previous chaste character, under 18 years, for the purpose of prostitution, or aiding or assisting therein, from being convicted upon the testimony of the woman upon, or with whom the offense was committed, unless she is corroborated by other evidence.
- Clarifies a Penal Code provision prohibiting a condition or restriction from being imposed upon an incarcerated person obtaining an abortion pursuant to the California Constitution and the RPA.
FISCAL EFFECT:
According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, the Osteopathic Medical Board of California estimates this bill would result in five additional enforcement cases per year, at an ongoing cost of $25,015 per year, which would be absorbable. The California State Board of Pharmacy anticipates minor and absorbable costs to provide education about the law. Minor and absorbable costs to DMHC, and costs of an unknown, but likely absorbable, amount to DHCS and CDPH.
PRIOR VOTES:
Assembly Floor: | 61 - 11 |
Assembly Appropriations Committee: | 11 - 4 |
Assembly Business and Professions Committee: Assembly Health Committee: | 14 - 1 12 – 1 |
COMMENTS:
- Author’s statement. According to the author, for years, California has promoted access to reproductive health care without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers. However, recent lawsuits and actions by the federal government are exploring ways to limit states’ ability to provide medication abortion drugs, posing a threat to Californians’ constitutional right to reproductive freedom. This bill enhances access to medication abortion in California by protecting health care providers, facilities, and patients who access abortion medication, while also expanding overall access to reproductive health care. This bill ensures that the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, secured by the California Constitution, remains protected. When access to the fundamental right to health care is under attack across the nation, this bill proactively seeks to ensure that the existing standard of practice for medication abortion remains legal in California.
- Abortion. According to the Center for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC), a legal induced abortion is defined as an intervention performed by a licensed clinician that is intended to terminate an ongoing pregnancy. Ending a pregnancy with medications is an option for women who are less than ten weeks pregnant and would like to have an abortion at home with a less invasive procedure. The CDC reports that 613,383 abortions were reported nationally from 48 reporting areas in 2022. From 2021 to 2022, the total number of abortions decreased 2%, and the number decreased 5% between 2013 and 2022. In 2022, women in their 20s accounted for more than half of abortions (56.5%). By contrast, adolescents under 15 years (0.2%) and women over 40 (3.6%) years accounted for the lowest percentages of abortions. In 2022, nearly all abortions (92.8%) were performed at or less than 13 weeks gestation. That year, the highest proportion of abortions were performed by early medication abortion at or less than nine weeks’ gestation (53.3%), followed by surgical abortion at or less than 13 weeks gestation (35.5%), surgical abortion at more than 13 weeks gestation (6.9%), and medication abortion at more than nine weeks gestation (4.3%). In 2021, the most recent year for which data was reviewed for pregnancy-related deaths, five women died as a result of complications from legal induced abortion.
- California data. According to the Guttmacher Institute, 182,170 abortions were provided by clinicians in California in 2024, though not all those abortions were provided to state residents. In January 2025, there were an estimated 17,020 clinician-provided abortions, and that number was consistent with the previous six-month period (average of 15,000 abortions per month). Data for 2023, the first full year after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, show that an estimated total of 179,120 clinician-provided abortions took place in California (an increase of 1.7%).
- Medication abortion. According to a March 2024 Kaiser Family Foundation factsheet, medication abortion is a pregnancy termination protocol that involves taking two different drugs approved for use up to the first 10 weeks of pregnancy by the FDA. The World Health Organization has authorized use up to 12 weeks of pregnancy. Since the FDA first approved the drug in 2000, its use in the U.S. has grown. In 2023, 63% of abortions in the U.S. were medication abortions. The most common medication abortion regimen involves the use of two different medications: mifepristone and misoprostol. Mifepristone, also known as the abortion pill or RU-486, is sold under the brand name Mifeprex and through a generic manufactured by GenBioPro. Mifepristone works by blocking progesterone, a hormone essential to the development of a pregnancy, and prevents an existing pregnancy from progressing. Misoprostol, taken 24 to 48 hours after mifepristone, works to empty the uterus by causing cramping and bleeding, similar to an early miscarriage. A follow-up visit can be scheduled a week or two later to confirm that the pregnancy was terminated via ultrasound or blood test. The FDA has found that medication abortion is a safe and highly effective method of pregnancy termination. Medication abortion successfully terminates the pregnancy 99.6% of the time, with a 0.4% risk of major complications, and a mortality rate of 0.00064%. Telehealth can be used to expand access to abortion services in areas where the number of clinicians who provide that care is limited. Many patients, particularly those who live in rural communities, must travel long distances to obtain abortion services even in states where abortion is still permitted. Because the updated FDA label now allows for telehealth, mifepristone has emerged as an option for patients who are either unable to travel to clinic or for other reasons wish to have an abortion in the privacy of their own home. As part of efforts to limit abortion access, some states have taken action to block the use of telehealth for abortion. Among the states that have not banned abortion, 13 have at least one restriction that requires at least one trip to the clinic, and effectively ban telehealth for medication abortion.
- Post-Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022). According to the Guttmacher Institute website (and as of May 28, 2025), since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June 2022, 13 states are enforcing a near-total ban on abortion with very limited exceptions (Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, and West Virginia). In other states, less restrictive rules are in place and include: abortion being banned after six weeks (Florida, Georgia, Iowa, and South Carolina); a 12-week ban (Nebraska and North Carolina); and, an 18-23 week ban (Kansas, Ohio, Utah, and Wisconsin). In Texas and Oklahoma, mailing abortion pills is also banned and criminal or civil liability to providers who mail abortion pills can be assigned. In Louisiana, medication abortion can only be dispensed in person.
According to a February 16, 2023 story in the New York Times, one commonality among many of the bans is that enforcement is enhanced through the targeting of medical providers. For example, in Texas it is a felony to perform an abortion, unless it is needed to save the life of the patient, and provides for civil liability and licensure revocation. The Texas law also provides that any person, other than an officer or employee of a state or local governmental entity in Texas, and regardless if they suffered any actual harm, may bring a civil action to enforce its provisions, which includes liability of $10,000 plus costs and fees if a plaintiff prevails while a defendant is prohibited from recovering their own costs and fees if they prevail. Idaho enacted a similar law, which provides for liability of $20,000 plus costs and fees if a plaintiff prevails. Oklahoma also enacted a similar law to Texas’ and enacted criminal penalties for the performance of an abortion, except when performed to save the life of a pregnant person, with punishment of up to ten years in prison or fines of up to $100,000.
In January 2025, a New York physician was indicted in Louisiana for providing medication abortion across state lines. According to a March 19, 2025 NPR report, Dr. Margaret Carpenter was charged alongside a Louisiana mother who allegedly received the mailed package and gave the pills prescribed by Carpenter to her minor daughter. The teen wanted to keep the pregnancy and called 911 after taking the pills, according to an NPR interview with the Louisiana district attorney prosecuting the case. The charges carry a possible five-year prison sentence. On February 11, Louisiana's governor signed an extradition warrant for Carpenter. He later posted a video arguing she "must face extradition to Louisiana, where she can stand trial and justice will be served." New York's governor countered by releasing her own video, confirming she was refusing to extradite Carpenter. According to a March 27, 2025 AP story, in a separate case involving Dr. Carpenter, a Texas judge ordered her to pay a penalty for allegedly breaking that state's law by prescribing abortion medication via telemedicine. The Texas attorney general's office followed up by asking a New York court to enforce the default civil judgment, which is $113,000 with attorney and filing fees. The acting Ulster County clerk refused, stating, “In accordance with the New York State Shield Law, I have refused this filing and will refuse any similar filings that may come to our office.” According to the March 2025 NPR report, eight states (New York, Maine, California, Colorado, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington) have passed laws since 2022 to protect doctors who mail abortion pills out of state, and thereby block them from extradition in such cases. But the Louisiana case is the first criminal test of these relatively new "shield laws."
- FDA review of mifepristone. On May 14, 2025, Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. testified before the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee that he had ordered FDA administrator Martin Makary to conduct a “complete review” of mifepristone and its labeling requirements. According to a June 5, 2025 CBS News report, a FDA spokesperson confirmed the plans, but did not respond to questions about when the review is scheduled to start and what exactly it will be reviewing about the medication. According to a June 2, 2025 letter from Martin Makary to U.S. Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri, the review aims to “closely monitor” the drug's safety. But according to the CBS News report, experts say concerns about its safety are misguided, fueled in part by a report from the Ethics and Public Policy Center, an advocacy group that promotes religious traditions and is funded by multiple right-wing organizations. In the Ethics and Public Policy Center report, which was not published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, the authors claim the pill harms women, causing one in ten patients to experience what they call a "serious adverse event," including hemorrhage, ER visits, ectopic pregnancy and an undefined category of "abortion-specific complications."
- FDA Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program and state attorneys general petition. According to the FDA, REMS is a drug safety program that is required for certain medications with serious safety concerns to help ensure its benefits outweigh its risks. While all medications have labeling that inform people about medication risks, only a few medications require a REMS. REMS is not designed to mitigate all the adverse events of a medication, these are communicated to health care providers in the medication’s prescribing information. Rather, REMS focus on preventing, monitoring and/or managing a specific serious risk by informing, educating, and/or reinforcing actions to reduce the frequency and/or severity of the event. In 2011, the FDA implemented a REMS on mifepristone (REMS program), stating that the goal was to mitigate the risk of serious complications associated with the drug by: a) requiring healthcare providers who prescribe mifepristone to be certified in the REMS program; b) ensuring that it is only dispensed in certain health care settings by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber; and, c) informing patients about the risk of serious complications associated with mifepristone. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the FDA stopped enforcement of the REMS in-person dispensing requirement for mifepristone, which enabled its provision by telemedicine and mail in some states. In January 2023, the FDA made permanent updates to the REMS program, including removing the in-person dispensing requirement and adding a new pharmacy certification process, which enabled retail pharmacies that meet certain qualifications to dispense mifepristone directly to patients who have a prescription from a certified prescriber. On June 5, 2025, the attorneys general (AGs) of California, Massachusetts, New York, and New Jersey jointly filed a petition with FDA requesting that it remove the REMS program on mifepristone, including the Prescriber Certification, Pharmacy Certification, and Patient Agreement form. The AGs asked that, barring removal of the REMS program, the FDA exercise its discretion to not enforce the requirements of the REMS program within the four petitioner states, leaving regulation of mifepristone to them. The AGs petition emphasized that the REMS program restrictions stand in stark contrast to the FDA’s treatment of riskier medications, like opioids, blood thinners, and other formulations of mifepristone used to treat illnesses like Cushing’s syndrome, which are not subject to REMS programs. Under federal law, REMS requirements must mitigate a specific serious risk and cannot be “unduly burdensome” on patients or health care delivery systems. The AGs argue that the current mifepristone REMS program fails to meet that standard.
- Telehealth in Medi-Cal. Medi-Cal’s telehealth policy was established pursuant to SB 1665 (Thompson, Chapter 864, Statutes of 1996) and updated by AB 415 (Logue, Chapter 547, Statutes of 2011). In 2019, DHCS undertook a policy review process, following extensive stakeholder engagement and public comment. The finalized policy was published in the Medi-Cal provider manual and disseminated to Medi-Cal managed care plans via an All Plan Letter. In 2020, due to the COVID-19 public health emergency, DHCS implemented broad flexibilities relative to telehealth modalities via blanket waivers and Disaster Relief state plan amendments. The flexibilities included expanding which providers could use telehealth, allowing telehealth to be used for new patients, allowing many services to be provided audio-only, expanding payment parity for telehealth services, waiving site limitations for federally qualified health centers and rural health centers, and expanding access through non-public technology platforms. Several of these COVID-19 flexibilities were extended via budget trailer bill AB 133 (Committee on Budget, Chapter 143, Statutes of 2021), along with a requirement for DHCS to convene a Telehealth Advisory Workgroup to inform the development of telehealth policies beyond the public health emergency. One outcome of the workgroup was a policy paper published by DHCS making a number of telehealth policy recommendations, many of which were subsequently incorporated into SB 184 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review, Chapter 47, Statutes of 2022), including requirements on the use of synchronous and asynchronous telehealth both generally and when establishing a new patient relationship.
While California Medi-Cal telehealth policy is broad, it is more restrictive on the use of asynchronous telehealth (also known as “store and forward”), particularly in the establishment of new patient relationships, where it is prohibited. Despite California’s otherwise expansive Medi-Cal telehealth coverage and reimbursement policies, according to a September 2023 California Health Care Foundation Report on telehealth use experiences, people on Medi-Cal use less telehealth than people with other forms of health coverage. Those who do use telehealth tend to like it as much or better than in-person care.
- Expansion of asynchronous telehealth in reproductive health services. The use of asynchronous telehealth has become more popular particularly for sensitive services such as reproductive health services. According to a 2019 issue brief by the Kaiser Family Foundation, telemedicine’s use in reproductive health care has shown promise in offering innovative solutions to unmet health needs, particularly in areas with few health care providers. While long acting reversible contraceptives require in-person care, providers can prescribe a variety of other contraceptive methods via telemedicine, including oral contraceptives.
The report states that almost all risk factors precluding use of hormonal birth control can be assessed online; and evaluations screen for age, smoking history, and conditions posing significant health risks, including clotting disorders, heart disease, breast cancer, and migraines with aura. These platforms cannot measure blood pressure, typically a necessity before initiating oral contraceptives, but most require the user input a reading from the last year; a method deemed acceptable by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) if a provider cannot measure the blood pressure. The report cited a 2019 New England Journal of Medicine study of tele-contraception, defined as the provision of contraception through a website or smartphone app, that found higher adherence to CDC guidelines by telehealth providers than in-person providers did, though many of the telehealth providers did not inform patients of the availability of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Since 2019, the use of asynchronous telehealth for reproductive services has expanded significantly. Other reproductive health services provided via asynchronous telehealth include urinary tract infection treatment, emergency contraception, medication abortion, testing or treatment for selected sexually transmitted diseases (often with mail-in, self-collected samples), treatment for symptoms related to perimenopause or menopause, and treatment for erectile dysfunction.
- Double referral. This bill has been double referred. Should it pass out of this Committee, it will be referred to the Committee on Business, Professions and Economic Development.
- Related legislation. AB 40 (Bonta) adds “reproductive health services, including abortion” to the definition of "emergency services and care" in existing law for purposes of provisions requiring hospitals and physicians to provide emergency care to patients without regard to ability to pay. AB 40 is set to be heard in this Committee on June 11, 2025.
AB 54 (Krell, Aguiar-Curry) prohibits a manufacturer, distributor, authorized health care provider, pharmacist, or individual from being subject to civil or criminal liability, or professional disciplinary action, for accessing, mailing, shipping, receiving, transporting, distributing, dispensing, or administering mifepristone or misoprostol after January 1, 2020. AB 54 is set to be heard in this Committee on June 11, 2025.
- Prior legislation. AB 2339 (Aguiar-Curry of 2024) would have permitted a Medi-Cal provider to establish a new patient relationship using asynchronous store and forward, when the visit is related to sensitive services and when established in accordance with requirements set by the DHCS and consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance. Ab 2339 was vetoed by Governor Newsom, who stated in part:
My Administration, in collaboration with the Legislature and the Telehealth Advisory Workgroup, worked to develop and implement one of the strongest telehealth policies in the country. Under the current Medi-Cal telehealth policy, licensed providers have substantial flexibility to make clinically appropriate decisions regarding the use of both synchronous and asynchronous telehealth modalities, and Medi-Cal pays the same rate for services provided via telehealth as services provided in-person.
I believe that robust telehealth policies increase access and reduce barriers to health care, including the use of asynchronous telehealth. However, there are details of a patient's medical history and personal health information that are best gathered during a synchronous appointment. For example, this bill would allow a patient to receive treatment and medications for reproductive and behavioral health services without ever seeing or talking directly to a provider. I believe that there are consumer protections provided through a live interaction between a patient and provider.
SB 345 (Skinner, Chapter 260, Statutes of 2023) enacts various safeguards against the enforcement of other states’ laws that prohibit, criminalize, sanction, authorize civil liability against, or otherwise interfere with a person, provider, or other entity in California that offers reproductive health care services or gender-affirming health care services.
SB 487 (Atkins, Chapter 261, Statutes of 2023) prohibits health plans and health insurers from terminating, discriminating against, or otherwise penalizing a provider based on a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or another disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is solely based on the application of another state’s law that interferes with a person’s right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California.
SB 487 permits the Department of Health Care Services to elect not to suspend a Medi-Cal provider who has a license, certificate, or other approval to provide health care suspended or revoked in another state if the revocation or suspension is based solely on conduct that is not deemed to be unprofessional conduct under California law.
AB 1666 (Bauer-Kahan, Chapter 42, Statutes of 2022) prohibits the enforcement of out-of-state laws authorizing a civil action against a person or entity that receives or performs or induces, or aids or abets the performance of an abortion, or who attempts or intends to engage in those actions and declares those out-of-state laws to be contrary to the public policy of this state.
AB 2091 (Mia Bonta, Chapter 628, Statutes of 2022), among other things, prohibits compelling a person to identify or provide information that would identify an individual who has sought or obtained an abortion in a state, county, city, or other local criminal, administrative, legislative, or other proceeding if the information is being requested based on another state’s laws that interfere with a person’s right to choose or obtain an abortion or a foreign penal civil action.
AB 2223 (Wicks, Chapter 629, Statutes of 2022) prohibits a person from being subject to civil or criminal liability, or otherwise deprived of their rights, based on their actions or omissions with respect to their pregnancy or actual, potential, or alleged pregnancy outcome or based solely on their actions to aid or assist a pregnant person who is exercising their reproductive rights.
SB 1301 (Kuehl, Chapter 385, Statutes of 2002) enacts the RPA, which provides that every individual possesses a fundamental right of privacy with respect to reproductive decisions, including the fundamental right to choose or refuse birth control, and the fundamental right to choose to bear a child or obtain an abortion.
- Support. Supporters write that medication abortion, and broad access to it, allows individuals to receive safe and effective abortion care in a least invasive manner. Any federal threats to restrict medication abortion and the drugs used are not only dangerous and risky, but also a direct attack on the state’s constitutional right to reproductive freedom. Mifepristone, a drug used in combination with a second drug – misoprostol – to terminate a pregnancy through medication abortion, was approved by the FDA in 2000. Accordingly, scientists have studied the safety of mifepristone for over 25 years, and these decades of evidence show that medication abortion and the drugs used in the process are safe and effective. President Trump’s appointees to lead the Health and Human Services Agency and the FDA have both made comments in their confirmation hearings about reevaluating mifepristone policies and its safety. With these vocalized, ongoing threats to eliminate legal protections and reduce access to medication abortion at the federal level, California must continue to lead in defending and safeguarding access to safe and accessible abortion care. This bill protects medication abortion by establishing that the current standard of care for the use of mifepristone will remain legal in this state, protecting providers that legally provide mifepristone, requiring the continuation of existing coverage for medication abortion, and expanding access to reproductive health care through telehealth. Proactively taking steps to protect care will help to ensure that there will not be an interruption of access to medication abortion care in California. When access to the fundamental right to health care is under attack across the nation, this bill proactively codifies the existing standard of practice for medication abortion so that it remains legal in California, regardless of federal actions. This bill reassures Californians that their rights to essential health care and bodily autonomy are – and will remain – protected.
SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION:
Support: Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine Access (co-sponsor)
Access Reproductive Justice (co-sponsor)
American Association of University Women – California (co-sponsor)
Attorney General Rob Bonta (co-sponsor)
Black Women for Wellness Action Project (co-sponsor)
California State Treasurer Fiona Ma (co-sponsor)
California Latinas for Reproductive Justice (co-sponsor)
Essential Access Health (co-sponsor)
Hey Jane (co-sponsor)
Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis (co-sponsor)
National Health Law Program (co-sponsor)
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California (co-sponsor)
Reproductive Freedom for All (co-sponsor)
Training in Early Abortion for Comprehensive Healthcare (co-sponsor)
Unite for Reproductive & Gender Equity (co-sponsor)
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
California Academy of Family Physicians
California Medical Association
California Nurse Midwives Association
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network
California Pharmacists Association
California Women’s Law Center
Citizens for Choice
County of Los Angeles
Equal Rights California
Equality California
Green Policy Initiative
Osteopathic Medical Board of California
Parent Voices California
San Francisco Bay Area Black & Jewish Unity Coalition
Women’s Foundation California
Women’s Health Specialists
Oppose: One individual
-- END --
SENATE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH
Senator Caroline Menjivar, Chair
BILL NO: AB 260
AUTHOR: | Aguiar-Curry | ||
VERSION: | June 2, 2025 | ||
HEARING DATE: | June 11, 2025 | ||
CONSULTANT: | Melanie Moreno | ||
SUBJECT: Sexual and reproductive health care
SUMMARY:
Prohibits the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) from taking criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a clinic or health facility for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs. Permits CDPH to adopt regulations specific to medication abortion drugs, including exempting those drugs from certain requirements if the drugs are no longer approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Prohibits a health plan contract or a group or individual health insurance policy that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, regardless of its FDA approval status. Requires the Department of Health Care Services to update provider enrollment requirements and procedures for providers who offer reproductive health care services exclusively through telehealth. Places various requirements on pharmacists related to prescribing and dispensing mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs. Makes various changes to requirements specific to healing arts practitioners who are authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer certain drugs. Deletes unconstitutional and obsolete provisions of existing law relating to criminal abortion penalties.
Existing law:
- Establishes the Reproductive Privacy Act (RPA), which prohibits the state from denying or interfering with a woman’s right to choose or obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the woman. [HSC §123460, et seq.]
- Prohibits a person who aids or assists a pregnant person in exercising their rights under RPA from being subject to civil or criminal liability or penalty, or otherwise being deprived of their rights, based solely on their actions to aid or assist a pregnant person in exercising their rights under RPA with the pregnant person's voluntary consent. [HSC §123467]
- Provides for the licensure and regulation of clinics and health facilities (hospitals, acute psychiatric hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, intermediate care facilities, congregate living facilities, correctional treatment center nursing facilities, and hospice facilities) by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). [HSC §1200 and §1250, et seq.]
- Establishes the Sherman Food, Drug and Cosmetics Law (Sherman Law), administered by CDPH, which regulates the packaging, labeling, and advertising of drugs and devices, including dietary supplements. [HSC §109875-§111929.4]
- Establishes the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) to regulate health plans under the Knox-Keene Health Care Services Plan Act of 1975; the California Department of Insurance (CDI) to regulate health and other insurers; the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to administer the Medi-Cal program. [HSC §1340, et seq., INS §106, et seq., and WIC §14000, et seq.]
- Prohibits health plans and health insurers from terminating, discriminating against, or otherwise penalizing a provider based on a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or another disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is solely based on the application of another state’s law that interferes with a person’s right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California. [HSC §1375.61 and INS §10133.641]
- Permits DHCS to elect not to suspend a Medi-Cal provider who has a license, certificate, or other approval to provide health care suspended or revoked in another state if the revocation or suspension is based solely on conduct that is not deemed to be unprofessional conduct under California law. [WIC §14043.6(b)]
- Defines “telehealth” as the mode of delivering health care services and public health via information and communication technologies to facilitate the diagnosis, consultation, treatment, education, care management, and self-management of a patient’s health care. [BPC §2290.5]
- Prohibits Medi-Cal providers from establishing a new patient relationship with a Medi-Cal recipient via asynchronous store and forward, audio-only synchronous interaction, remote patient monitoring, or other virtual communication modalities except for visits provided by specified federally qualified health center or rural health center providers using asynchronous store and forward and audio-only synchronous interaction when services delivered through that interaction meet the applicable standard of care. [WIC §14132.725]
- Permits Medi-Cal providers to establish a new patient relationship via the use of audio-only synchronous interactions when the visit is related to sensitive services as defined in state law in accordance with DHCS-specific requirements and consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance. “Sensitive services” include all health care services related to mental or behavioral health, sexual and reproductive health, sexually transmitted infections, substance use disorder, gender affirming care, and intimate partner violence, HIV testing, including the related sensitive services that minors can consent to. [WIC §14132.725 and CIV §56.05]
- Permits Medi-Cal providers to establish a new patient relationship using an audio-only synchronous interaction when the patient requests an audio-only modality or attests they do not have access to video, and when established in accordance with DHCS-specific requirements and consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance. [WIC §14132.725]
This bill:
Clinics and health facilities
- Prohibits CDPH from suspending or revoking a license, or otherwise taking disciplinary action against a clinic or health facility solely on the basis that it manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for lawful medication abortion.
Prohibits CDPH from denying an application for licensure, suspending or revoking a license, or otherwise imposing discipline upon a clinic or health facility solely because it is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
Makes these provisions of this bill severable: if any provision or its application is held invalid, and prohibits that invalidity from affecting other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
Health plans and insurers
- Prohibits a health plan contract or insurance policy that covers prescription drug benefits from being issued, amended, delivered, or renewed if it limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that: the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the FDA-approved use; or, that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation (REM) strategy, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
- Prohibits a health plan contract or insurance policy that covers prescription drug benefits from being issued, amended, delivered, or renewed if it limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone regardless of its FDA approval status, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
- Prohibits a health plan or insurer from discriminating, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of this state. Additionally prohibits a health plan contract or insurance policy from containing any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal, or to otherwise penalize a provider, based on those activities.
Regulation of medication abortion drugs
- Permits CDPH to adopt regulations relating to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion by such drugs including those drugs within, or excluding those drugs from, the requirements the Sherman Law, whether or not it is in accordance with federal law.
- Prohibits the Sherman Law from applying to brand name or generic mifepristone in the event of a labeling change or in the absence of its FDA approval, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
Makes these two provisions of this bill severable: if any provision or its application is held invalid, and prohibits that invalidity from affecting other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
Exempts, from certain labeling requirements in the Sherman Law, a brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device.
Medi-Cal
- Requires DHCS to update the Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirement and procedures for remote service reproductive health care providers who offer services exclusively through telehealth modalities seeking enrollment in the Medi-Cal program to report an “administrative location” as their service address. Exempts that location from the following established place of business requirements under existing law:
- Displays regular and permanently posted business hours;
- Being identifiable as a medical or health care provider or business by permanently attached signage that identifies the name of the provider or business as shown on the application; and,
- Obtaining and maintaining liability insurance coverage, which covers premises and operation, in an amount of at least $100,000 per claim, with a minimum annual aggregate of at least $300,000 from an authorized insurer.
- Requires DHCS to modify existing telehealth regulations to permit the use of a cellular telephone as the primary business phone for reproductive health care providers.
- Requires reproductive health remote service providers to meet current Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirements and standards.
- Permits a health care provider to establish a new patient relationship using asynchronous store and forward if the visit is related to reproductive health care services, if those services meet the applicable standard of care and can be appropriately delivered via the telehealth modalities, the patient requests an asynchronous store and forward modality, and the relationship is established in accordance with DHCS requirements and consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance.
Business and Professions Code provisions
- Protects a healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs from a civil or criminal action or disciplinary or other administrative proceeding solely on the basis that the practitioner prescribed, furnished, ordered, or administered brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
- Declares that the authority of a healing arts practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion is the practice of medicine, and the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the ability of a practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion if that action is lawful under the laws of the state, are against the public policy of California.
- Prohibits healing arts boards from denying a license or taking disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state, including in circumstances where that protected activity resulted in criminal conviction or discipline in another state.
- Prohibits an individual or state or local officer from commencing a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
- Permits a pharmacist to dispense brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the prescriber or the name and address of the pharmacy otherwise required to be listed on the prescription label, if the label contains a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
- Requires a pharmacist who dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion to maintain a log with the prescription numbers and the information otherwise required to be listed on the prescription label; provides that these records shall not be open to inspection by law enforcement without a valid, court-issued subpoena but that the investigation of an activity that is punishable as a crime under the laws of California is not prohibited, provided that records are not shared with an individual or entity from another state.
- Requires a pharmacist to inform the patient that the pharmacist is dispensing a brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion under the labeling exemption.
Removal of obsolete code and other clarifying changes
- Deletes an unconstitutional Family Code provision prohibiting a minor from receiving an abortion without the consent of a parent or guardian.
- Repeals an obsolete Penal Code provision prohibiting a defendant on trial for procuring or attempting to procure an abortion, or aiding or assisting therein, or for inveigling, enticing, or taking away an unmarried female of previous chaste character, under 18 years, for the purpose of prostitution, or aiding or assisting therein, from being convicted upon the testimony of the woman upon, or with whom the offense was committed, unless she is corroborated by other evidence.
- Clarifies a Penal Code provision prohibiting a condition or restriction from being imposed upon an incarcerated person obtaining an abortion pursuant to the California Constitution and the RPA.
FISCAL EFFECT:
According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, the Osteopathic Medical Board of California estimates this bill would result in five additional enforcement cases per year, at an ongoing cost of $25,015 per year, which would be absorbable. The California State Board of Pharmacy anticipates minor and absorbable costs to provide education about the law. Minor and absorbable costs to DMHC, and costs of an unknown, but likely absorbable, amount to DHCS and CDPH.
PRIOR VOTES:
Assembly Floor: | 61 - 11 |
Assembly Appropriations Committee: | 11 - 4 |
Assembly Business and Professions Committee: Assembly Health Committee: | 14 - 1 12 – 1 |
COMMENTS:
- Author’s statement. According to the author, for years, California has promoted access to reproductive health care without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers. However, recent lawsuits and actions by the federal government are exploring ways to limit states’ ability to provide medication abortion drugs, posing a threat to Californians’ constitutional right to reproductive freedom. This bill enhances access to medication abortion in California by protecting health care providers, facilities, and patients who access abortion medication, while also expanding overall access to reproductive health care. This bill ensures that the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, secured by the California Constitution, remains protected. When access to the fundamental right to health care is under attack across the nation, this bill proactively seeks to ensure that the existing standard of practice for medication abortion remains legal in California.
- Abortion. According to the Center for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC), a legal induced abortion is defined as an intervention performed by a licensed clinician that is intended to terminate an ongoing pregnancy. Ending a pregnancy with medications is an option for women who are less than ten weeks pregnant and would like to have an abortion at home with a less invasive procedure. The CDC reports that 613,383 abortions were reported nationally from 48 reporting areas in 2022. From 2021 to 2022, the total number of abortions decreased 2%, and the number decreased 5% between 2013 and 2022. In 2022, women in their 20s accounted for more than half of abortions (56.5%). By contrast, adolescents under 15 years (0.2%) and women over 40 (3.6%) years accounted for the lowest percentages of abortions. In 2022, nearly all abortions (92.8%) were performed at or less than 13 weeks gestation. That year, the highest proportion of abortions were performed by early medication abortion at or less than nine weeks’ gestation (53.3%), followed by surgical abortion at or less than 13 weeks gestation (35.5%), surgical abortion at more than 13 weeks gestation (6.9%), and medication abortion at more than nine weeks gestation (4.3%). In 2021, the most recent year for which data was reviewed for pregnancy-related deaths, five women died as a result of complications from legal induced abortion.
- California data. According to the Guttmacher Institute, 182,170 abortions were provided by clinicians in California in 2024, though not all those abortions were provided to state residents. In January 2025, there were an estimated 17,020 clinician-provided abortions, and that number was consistent with the previous six-month period (average of 15,000 abortions per month). Data for 2023, the first full year after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, show that an estimated total of 179,120 clinician-provided abortions took place in California (an increase of 1.7%).
- Medication abortion. According to a March 2024 Kaiser Family Foundation factsheet, medication abortion is a pregnancy termination protocol that involves taking two different drugs approved for use up to the first 10 weeks of pregnancy by the FDA. The World Health Organization has authorized use up to 12 weeks of pregnancy. Since the FDA first approved the drug in 2000, its use in the U.S. has grown. In 2023, 63% of abortions in the U.S. were medication abortions. The most common medication abortion regimen involves the use of two different medications: mifepristone and misoprostol. Mifepristone, also known as the abortion pill or RU-486, is sold under the brand name Mifeprex and through a generic manufactured by GenBioPro. Mifepristone works by blocking progesterone, a hormone essential to the development of a pregnancy, and prevents an existing pregnancy from progressing. Misoprostol, taken 24 to 48 hours after mifepristone, works to empty the uterus by causing cramping and bleeding, similar to an early miscarriage. A follow-up visit can be scheduled a week or two later to confirm that the pregnancy was terminated via ultrasound or blood test. The FDA has found that medication abortion is a safe and highly effective method of pregnancy termination. Medication abortion successfully terminates the pregnancy 99.6% of the time, with a 0.4% risk of major complications, and a mortality rate of 0.00064%. Telehealth can be used to expand access to abortion services in areas where the number of clinicians who provide that care is limited. Many patients, particularly those who live in rural communities, must travel long distances to obtain abortion services even in states where abortion is still permitted. Because the updated FDA label now allows for telehealth, mifepristone has emerged as an option for patients who are either unable to travel to clinic or for other reasons wish to have an abortion in the privacy of their own home. As part of efforts to limit abortion access, some states have taken action to block the use of telehealth for abortion. Among the states that have not banned abortion, 13 have at least one restriction that requires at least one trip to the clinic, and effectively ban telehealth for medication abortion.
- Post-Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022). According to the Guttmacher Institute website (and as of May 28, 2025), since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June 2022, 13 states are enforcing a near-total ban on abortion with very limited exceptions (Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, and West Virginia). In other states, less restrictive rules are in place and include: abortion being banned after six weeks (Florida, Georgia, Iowa, and South Carolina); a 12-week ban (Nebraska and North Carolina); and, an 18-23 week ban (Kansas, Ohio, Utah, and Wisconsin). In Texas and Oklahoma, mailing abortion pills is also banned and criminal or civil liability to providers who mail abortion pills can be assigned. In Louisiana, medication abortion can only be dispensed in person.
According to a February 16, 2023 story in the New York Times, one commonality among many of the bans is that enforcement is enhanced through the targeting of medical providers. For example, in Texas it is a felony to perform an abortion, unless it is needed to save the life of the patient, and provides for civil liability and licensure revocation. The Texas law also provides that any person, other than an officer or employee of a state or local governmental entity in Texas, and regardless if they suffered any actual harm, may bring a civil action to enforce its provisions, which includes liability of $10,000 plus costs and fees if a plaintiff prevails while a defendant is prohibited from recovering their own costs and fees if they prevail. Idaho enacted a similar law, which provides for liability of $20,000 plus costs and fees if a plaintiff prevails. Oklahoma also enacted a similar law to Texas’ and enacted criminal penalties for the performance of an abortion, except when performed to save the life of a pregnant person, with punishment of up to ten years in prison or fines of up to $100,000.
In January 2025, a New York physician was indicted in Louisiana for providing medication abortion across state lines. According to a March 19, 2025 NPR report, Dr. Margaret Carpenter was charged alongside a Louisiana mother who allegedly received the mailed package and gave the pills prescribed by Carpenter to her minor daughter. The teen wanted to keep the pregnancy and called 911 after taking the pills, according to an NPR interview with the Louisiana district attorney prosecuting the case. The charges carry a possible five-year prison sentence. On February 11, Louisiana's governor signed an extradition warrant for Carpenter. He later posted a video arguing she "must face extradition to Louisiana, where she can stand trial and justice will be served." New York's governor countered by releasing her own video, confirming she was refusing to extradite Carpenter. According to a March 27, 2025 AP story, in a separate case involving Dr. Carpenter, a Texas judge ordered her to pay a penalty for allegedly breaking that state's law by prescribing abortion medication via telemedicine. The Texas attorney general's office followed up by asking a New York court to enforce the default civil judgment, which is $113,000 with attorney and filing fees. The acting Ulster County clerk refused, stating, “In accordance with the New York State Shield Law, I have refused this filing and will refuse any similar filings that may come to our office.” According to the March 2025 NPR report, eight states (New York, Maine, California, Colorado, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington) have passed laws since 2022 to protect doctors who mail abortion pills out of state, and thereby block them from extradition in such cases. But the Louisiana case is the first criminal test of these relatively new "shield laws."
- FDA review of mifepristone. On May 14, 2025, Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. testified before the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee that he had ordered FDA administrator Martin Makary to conduct a “complete review” of mifepristone and its labeling requirements. According to a June 5, 2025 CBS News report, a FDA spokesperson confirmed the plans, but did not respond to questions about when the review is scheduled to start and what exactly it will be reviewing about the medication. According to a June 2, 2025 letter from Martin Makary to U.S. Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri, the review aims to “closely monitor” the drug's safety. But according to the CBS News report, experts say concerns about its safety are misguided, fueled in part by a report from the Ethics and Public Policy Center, an advocacy group that promotes religious traditions and is funded by multiple right-wing organizations. In the Ethics and Public Policy Center report, which was not published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, the authors claim the pill harms women, causing one in ten patients to experience what they call a "serious adverse event," including hemorrhage, ER visits, ectopic pregnancy and an undefined category of "abortion-specific complications."
- FDA Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program and state attorneys general petition. According to the FDA, REMS is a drug safety program that is required for certain medications with serious safety concerns to help ensure its benefits outweigh its risks. While all medications have labeling that inform people about medication risks, only a few medications require a REMS. REMS is not designed to mitigate all the adverse events of a medication, these are communicated to health care providers in the medication’s prescribing information. Rather, REMS focus on preventing, monitoring and/or managing a specific serious risk by informing, educating, and/or reinforcing actions to reduce the frequency and/or severity of the event. In 2011, the FDA implemented a REMS on mifepristone (REMS program), stating that the goal was to mitigate the risk of serious complications associated with the drug by: a) requiring healthcare providers who prescribe mifepristone to be certified in the REMS program; b) ensuring that it is only dispensed in certain health care settings by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber; and, c) informing patients about the risk of serious complications associated with mifepristone. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the FDA stopped enforcement of the REMS in-person dispensing requirement for mifepristone, which enabled its provision by telemedicine and mail in some states. In January 2023, the FDA made permanent updates to the REMS program, including removing the in-person dispensing requirement and adding a new pharmacy certification process, which enabled retail pharmacies that meet certain qualifications to dispense mifepristone directly to patients who have a prescription from a certified prescriber. On June 5, 2025, the attorneys general (AGs) of California, Massachusetts, New York, and New Jersey jointly filed a petition with FDA requesting that it remove the REMS program on mifepristone, including the Prescriber Certification, Pharmacy Certification, and Patient Agreement form. The AGs asked that, barring removal of the REMS program, the FDA exercise its discretion to not enforce the requirements of the REMS program within the four petitioner states, leaving regulation of mifepristone to them. The AGs petition emphasized that the REMS program restrictions stand in stark contrast to the FDA’s treatment of riskier medications, like opioids, blood thinners, and other formulations of mifepristone used to treat illnesses like Cushing’s syndrome, which are not subject to REMS programs. Under federal law, REMS requirements must mitigate a specific serious risk and cannot be “unduly burdensome” on patients or health care delivery systems. The AGs argue that the current mifepristone REMS program fails to meet that standard.
- Telehealth in Medi-Cal. Medi-Cal’s telehealth policy was established pursuant to SB 1665 (Thompson, Chapter 864, Statutes of 1996) and updated by AB 415 (Logue, Chapter 547, Statutes of 2011). In 2019, DHCS undertook a policy review process, following extensive stakeholder engagement and public comment. The finalized policy was published in the Medi-Cal provider manual and disseminated to Medi-Cal managed care plans via an All Plan Letter. In 2020, due to the COVID-19 public health emergency, DHCS implemented broad flexibilities relative to telehealth modalities via blanket waivers and Disaster Relief state plan amendments. The flexibilities included expanding which providers could use telehealth, allowing telehealth to be used for new patients, allowing many services to be provided audio-only, expanding payment parity for telehealth services, waiving site limitations for federally qualified health centers and rural health centers, and expanding access through non-public technology platforms. Several of these COVID-19 flexibilities were extended via budget trailer bill AB 133 (Committee on Budget, Chapter 143, Statutes of 2021), along with a requirement for DHCS to convene a Telehealth Advisory Workgroup to inform the development of telehealth policies beyond the public health emergency. One outcome of the workgroup was a policy paper published by DHCS making a number of telehealth policy recommendations, many of which were subsequently incorporated into SB 184 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review, Chapter 47, Statutes of 2022), including requirements on the use of synchronous and asynchronous telehealth both generally and when establishing a new patient relationship.
While California Medi-Cal telehealth policy is broad, it is more restrictive on the use of asynchronous telehealth (also known as “store and forward”), particularly in the establishment of new patient relationships, where it is prohibited. Despite California’s otherwise expansive Medi-Cal telehealth coverage and reimbursement policies, according to a September 2023 California Health Care Foundation Report on telehealth use experiences, people on Medi-Cal use less telehealth than people with other forms of health coverage. Those who do use telehealth tend to like it as much or better than in-person care.
- Expansion of asynchronous telehealth in reproductive health services. The use of asynchronous telehealth has become more popular particularly for sensitive services such as reproductive health services. According to a 2019 issue brief by the Kaiser Family Foundation, telemedicine’s use in reproductive health care has shown promise in offering innovative solutions to unmet health needs, particularly in areas with few health care providers. While long acting reversible contraceptives require in-person care, providers can prescribe a variety of other contraceptive methods via telemedicine, including oral contraceptives.
The report states that almost all risk factors precluding use of hormonal birth control can be assessed online; and evaluations screen for age, smoking history, and conditions posing significant health risks, including clotting disorders, heart disease, breast cancer, and migraines with aura. These platforms cannot measure blood pressure, typically a necessity before initiating oral contraceptives, but most require the user input a reading from the last year; a method deemed acceptable by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) if a provider cannot measure the blood pressure. The report cited a 2019 New England Journal of Medicine study of tele-contraception, defined as the provision of contraception through a website or smartphone app, that found higher adherence to CDC guidelines by telehealth providers than in-person providers did, though many of the telehealth providers did not inform patients of the availability of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Since 2019, the use of asynchronous telehealth for reproductive services has expanded significantly. Other reproductive health services provided via asynchronous telehealth include urinary tract infection treatment, emergency contraception, medication abortion, testing or treatment for selected sexually transmitted diseases (often with mail-in, self-collected samples), treatment for symptoms related to perimenopause or menopause, and treatment for erectile dysfunction.
- Double referral. This bill has been double referred. Should it pass out of this Committee, it will be referred to the Committee on Business, Professions and Economic Development.
- Related legislation. AB 40 (Bonta) adds “reproductive health services, including abortion” to the definition of "emergency services and care" in existing law for purposes of provisions requiring hospitals and physicians to provide emergency care to patients without regard to ability to pay. AB 40 is set to be heard in this Committee on June 11, 2025.
AB 54 (Krell, Aguiar-Curry) prohibits a manufacturer, distributor, authorized health care provider, pharmacist, or individual from being subject to civil or criminal liability, or professional disciplinary action, for accessing, mailing, shipping, receiving, transporting, distributing, dispensing, or administering mifepristone or misoprostol after January 1, 2020. AB 54 is set to be heard in this Committee on June 11, 2025.
- Prior legislation. AB 2339 (Aguiar-Curry of 2024) would have permitted a Medi-Cal provider to establish a new patient relationship using asynchronous store and forward, when the visit is related to sensitive services and when established in accordance with requirements set by the DHCS and consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance. Ab 2339 was vetoed by Governor Newsom, who stated in part:
My Administration, in collaboration with the Legislature and the Telehealth Advisory Workgroup, worked to develop and implement one of the strongest telehealth policies in the country. Under the current Medi-Cal telehealth policy, licensed providers have substantial flexibility to make clinically appropriate decisions regarding the use of both synchronous and asynchronous telehealth modalities, and Medi-Cal pays the same rate for services provided via telehealth as services provided in-person.
I believe that robust telehealth policies increase access and reduce barriers to health care, including the use of asynchronous telehealth. However, there are details of a patient's medical history and personal health information that are best gathered during a synchronous appointment. For example, this bill would allow a patient to receive treatment and medications for reproductive and behavioral health services without ever seeing or talking directly to a provider. I believe that there are consumer protections provided through a live interaction between a patient and provider.
SB 345 (Skinner, Chapter 260, Statutes of 2023) enacts various safeguards against the enforcement of other states’ laws that prohibit, criminalize, sanction, authorize civil liability against, or otherwise interfere with a person, provider, or other entity in California that offers reproductive health care services or gender-affirming health care services.
SB 487 (Atkins, Chapter 261, Statutes of 2023) prohibits health plans and health insurers from terminating, discriminating against, or otherwise penalizing a provider based on a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or another disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is solely based on the application of another state’s law that interferes with a person’s right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California.
SB 487 permits the Department of Health Care Services to elect not to suspend a Medi-Cal provider who has a license, certificate, or other approval to provide health care suspended or revoked in another state if the revocation or suspension is based solely on conduct that is not deemed to be unprofessional conduct under California law.
AB 1666 (Bauer-Kahan, Chapter 42, Statutes of 2022) prohibits the enforcement of out-of-state laws authorizing a civil action against a person or entity that receives or performs or induces, or aids or abets the performance of an abortion, or who attempts or intends to engage in those actions and declares those out-of-state laws to be contrary to the public policy of this state.
AB 2091 (Mia Bonta, Chapter 628, Statutes of 2022), among other things, prohibits compelling a person to identify or provide information that would identify an individual who has sought or obtained an abortion in a state, county, city, or other local criminal, administrative, legislative, or other proceeding if the information is being requested based on another state’s laws that interfere with a person’s right to choose or obtain an abortion or a foreign penal civil action.
AB 2223 (Wicks, Chapter 629, Statutes of 2022) prohibits a person from being subject to civil or criminal liability, or otherwise deprived of their rights, based on their actions or omissions with respect to their pregnancy or actual, potential, or alleged pregnancy outcome or based solely on their actions to aid or assist a pregnant person who is exercising their reproductive rights.
SB 1301 (Kuehl, Chapter 385, Statutes of 2002) enacts the RPA, which provides that every individual possesses a fundamental right of privacy with respect to reproductive decisions, including the fundamental right to choose or refuse birth control, and the fundamental right to choose to bear a child or obtain an abortion.
- Support. Supporters write that medication abortion, and broad access to it, allows individuals to receive safe and effective abortion care in a least invasive manner. Any federal threats to restrict medication abortion and the drugs used are not only dangerous and risky, but also a direct attack on the state’s constitutional right to reproductive freedom. Mifepristone, a drug used in combination with a second drug – misoprostol – to terminate a pregnancy through medication abortion, was approved by the FDA in 2000. Accordingly, scientists have studied the safety of mifepristone for over 25 years, and these decades of evidence show that medication abortion and the drugs used in the process are safe and effective. President Trump’s appointees to lead the Health and Human Services Agency and the FDA have both made comments in their confirmation hearings about reevaluating mifepristone policies and its safety. With these vocalized, ongoing threats to eliminate legal protections and reduce access to medication abortion at the federal level, California must continue to lead in defending and safeguarding access to safe and accessible abortion care. This bill protects medication abortion by establishing that the current standard of care for the use of mifepristone will remain legal in this state, protecting providers that legally provide mifepristone, requiring the continuation of existing coverage for medication abortion, and expanding access to reproductive health care through telehealth. Proactively taking steps to protect care will help to ensure that there will not be an interruption of access to medication abortion care in California. When access to the fundamental right to health care is under attack across the nation, this bill proactively codifies the existing standard of practice for medication abortion so that it remains legal in California, regardless of federal actions. This bill reassures Californians that their rights to essential health care and bodily autonomy are – and will remain – protected.
SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION:
Support: Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine Access (co-sponsor)
Access Reproductive Justice (co-sponsor)
American Association of University Women – California (co-sponsor)
Attorney General Rob Bonta (co-sponsor)
California State Treasurer Fiona Ma (co-sponsor)
Black Women for Wellness Action Project (co-sponsor)
California Latinas for Reproductive Justice (co-sponsor)
Essential Access Health (co-sponsor)
Hey Jane (co-sponsor)
Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis (co-sponsor)
National Health Law Program (co-sponsor)
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California (co-sponsor)
Reproductive Freedom for All (co-sponsor)
Training in Early Abortion for Comprehensive Healthcare (co-sponsor)
Unite for Reproductive & Gender Equity (co-sponsor)
California Academy of Family Physicians
California Medical Association
California Nurse Midwives Association
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network
California Pharmacists Association
California Women’s Law Center
County of Los Angeles
Osteopathic Medical Board of California
Parent Voices California
San Francisco Bay Area Black & Jewish Unity Coalition
Women’s Foundation California
Women’s Health Specialists
Oppose: One individual
-- END --
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
ATR Bill Id:AB 260
Author:(Aguiar-Curry)
As Amended Ver:March 17, 2025
Majority vote
SUMMARY
Repeals unconstitutional, and deletes obsolete provisions of current law relating to criminal abortion penalties. Authorizes the California Department of Public Health (DPH) to adopt regulations specific to mifepristone and other medication abortion drugs, including exempting those drugs from certain requirements if the drugs are no longer approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Places various requirements on pharmacists related to prescribing and dispensing mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs. Prohibits DPH from taking criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a clinic or health facility for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs. Requires the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to update provider enrollment requirements and procedures for remote service providers who offer reproductive health care services exclusively thorough telehealth modalities. Prohibits a health care service plan contract or a group or individual disability insurance policy that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, regardless of its FDA approval status. Makes various changes to requirements specific to healing arts practitioners who are authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer certain drugs.
Major Provisions
COMMENTS
Background. Every pregnant individual in California has the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, a right guaranteed the California Constitution and supported by other state laws protecting access to sexual and reproductive health care in the state. However, at the federal level, there is uncertainty about the continued access of abortion care, specifically as it relates to mifepristone, a drug used for medication abortion. Since taking office, the Trump Administration has taken action to restrict access to reproductive and sexual health care and vocalized that additional steps are imminent, rolling back existing protections and advancements, access, and equity achieved for patients, providers, and health facilities.
In the first week of the Administration, President Trump signed an Executive Order directing agencies to review programs and calling for more stringent enforcement of the Hyde Amendment. Notably, the order indicates an intent to expand the reach of the Hyde Amendment, by further restricting not just the funding but also the "promotion" of abortion access, even in states like California. Additionally, despite years of research, the U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. further stated during his confirmation hearing that "President Trump has asked me to study the safety of mifepristone." Similarly, the nominee for U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA) administrator, Martin Makary, also made no commitment to maintain current mifepristone policies in his confirmation hearing.
Mifepristone. Medication abortion allows individuals to receive safe and effective abortion care in a less invasive manner. Over two-thirds of all abortions in the U.S. are medication abortions. Mifepristone, a drug used in combination with a second drug – misoprostol – was approved by the FDA in 2000 to terminate a pregnancy. Decades of evidence show that medication abortion and the drugs used in the process are safe and effective.
According to a March 2024 American Medical Association brief, "Reducing access to mifepristone would harm patients," access to mifepristone significantly improves benefits for vulnerable communities, particularly those in rural areas, people of color, and low-income individuals, by expanding access to life-saving reproductive care. Mifepristone, when used with misoprostol, allows individuals to terminate pregnancies safely at home, which is especially crucial for those who live in maternity care deserts or face hardships traveling long distances for medical procedures.
Disparities in access to care. For women of color, low-income women, and rural residents, the dangers of pregnancy in the U.S. are exacerbated, as they are more likely to experience severe maternal morbidity or even pregnancy-related deaths. Additionally, these populations are disproportionately affected by restrictions on abortion care. Studies show that people of color make up the majority of abortion patients, with 75% living at or below 200% of the federal poverty level. Moreover, pregnant individuals of color are more likely to face early pregnancy loss or miscarriage, conditions for which mifepristone is used in treatment. The ability to access abortion care via telehealth, which has been a lifeline for many in these communities, further underscores how mifepristone can be a critical tool in improving access to essential reproductive care, ensuring that vulnerable populations are not left behind in their healthcare needs.
California Abortion Coverage. California law prohibits the state from denying or interfering with a person's right to choose or obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus, or when medically necessary. The state defines viability as the point in a pregnancy when, in the good faith medical judgment of a physician, there is a reasonable likelihood that a fetus will survive outside the uterus without "extraordinary medical measures." Abortion is considered a basic health care service in California and, therefore, is required to be covered by commercial health insurance plans and policies. Medically necessary follow-up services to abortions that constitute basic health care services must also be covered. Similarly, Medi-Cal covers abortion and related services comprehensively as a state-funded benefit.
Shield laws. Since the overturn of Roe v. Wade, eight states (California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington) have passed shield laws, which say that the state government will not comply with civil or criminal prosecutions targeting health care providers who perform abortions from their home states, including mailing medication to patients in places where the procedure is outlawed. Recently a doctor in New York was sued for mailing medication abortion to patients in Louisiana and Texas, two states in which abortion is heavily restricted. This bill seeks to mitigate the harm that could be caused if states can sue a doctor for dispensing or prescribing mifepristone by allowing pharmacists to keep certain information off of the prescription label. This policy has already been signed into law in New York.
According to the Author
For years, California has promoted access to reproductive health care without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers. However, recent lawsuits and actions by the federal government are exploring ways to limit states' ability to provide medication abortion drugs, posing a threat to Californians' constitutional right to reproductive freedom. This bill enhances access to medication abortion in California by protecting health care providers, facilities, and patients who access abortion medication, while also expanding overall access to reproductive health care. This bill ensures that the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, secured by the California Constitution, remains protected. When access to the fundamental right to health care is under attack across the nation, this bill proactively seeks to ensure that the existing standard of practice for medication abortion remains legal in California.
Arguments in Support
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California (PPAC) is the sponsor of this bill and states that medication abortion, and broad access to it, allows individuals to receive safe and effective abortion care in a least-invasive manner. Any federal threats to restrict medication abortion and the drugs used are not only dangerous and risky, but also a direct attack on the state's constitutional right to reproductive freedom. PPAC notes that mifepristone, a drug used in combination with a second drug – misoprostol – to terminate a pregnancy through medication abortion, was approved by the FDA in 2000. Accordingly, scientists have studied the safety of mifepristone for over 25 years, and these decades of evidence show that medication abortion and the drugs used in the process are safe and effective.
PPAC points to the fact that President Trump's appointees to lead the Health and Human Services Agency and the FDA have both made comments in their confirmation hearings about reevaluating mifepristone policies and its safety. With these vocalized, ongoing threats to eliminate legal protections and reduce access to medication abortion at the federal level, California must continue to lead in defending and safeguarding access to safe and accessible abortion care.
PPAC argues that this bill protects medication abortion by establishing that the current standard of care for the use of mifepristone will remain legal in this state, protecting providers that legally provide mifepristone, requiring the continuation of existing coverage for medication abortion, and expanding access to reproductive health care through telehealth. Proactively taking steps to protect care will help to ensure that there will not be an interruption of access to medication abortion care in California. PPAC concludes that when access to the fundamental right to health care is under attack across the nation, this bill proactively codifies that the existing standard of practice for medication abortion so that it remains legal in California, regardless of federal actions.
Arguments in Opposition
None on file.
FISCAL COMMENTS
According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, the Osteopathic Medical Board of California estimates this bill would result in five additional enforcement cases per year, at an ongoing cost of $25,015 per year, which would be absorbable. The California State Board of Pharmacy anticipates minor and absorbable costs to provide education about the law. Minor and absorbable costs to the Department of Managed Health Care, and costs of an unknown, but likely absorbable, amount to DHCS and the Department of Public Health.
VOTES
ASM HEALTH: 12-1-2
YES: Bonta, Addis, Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Carrillo, Mark González, Krell, Patel, Celeste Rodriguez, Schiavo, Sharp-Collins, Stefani
NO: Sanchez
ABS, ABST OR NV: Chen, Flora
ASM BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS: 14-1-3
YES: Berman, Ahrens, Alanis, Bains, Bauer-Kahan, Caloza, Elhawary, Wilson, Irwin, Jackson, Krell, Lowenthal, Nguyen, Pellerin
NO: Macedo
ABS, ABST OR NV: Flora, Chen, Hadwick
ASM APPROPRIATIONS: 11-4-0
YES: Wicks, Arambula, Calderon, Caloza, Elhawary, Fong, Mark González, Hart, Pacheco, Pellerin, Solache
NO: Sanchez, Dixon, Ta, Tangipa
UPDATED
VERSION: March 17, 2025
CONSULTANT: Lara Flynn / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097 FN: 0000410
Date of Hearing: May 14, 2025
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Buffy Wicks, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 260
Author:(Aguiar-Curry) – As Amended Ver:March 17, 2025
Policy Committee: | Health | Vote: | 12 - 1 |
Business and Professions | 14 - 1 | ||
|
|
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY:
This bill establishes a variety of protections to ensure access to abortion medication, with emphasis on actions of health care providers.
Specifically, this bill:
- Protects a healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer (collectively, “provide”) dangerous drugs from various disciplinary actions for providing abortion medications for off-label use.
- Clarifies that the authority of a healing arts practitioner to provide abortion medication is the practice of medicine, and that the laws of another state or any federal actions that interfere with the ability of a practitioner to provide any drug used for medication abortion is against the public policy of this state.
- Repeals various obsolete provisions of law referencing criminal abortions and other invalidated restrictions on abortion access.
- Prohibits a healing arts board from denying a license or taking disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state, including when that activity resulted in criminal conviction or discipline in another state.
- Prohibits an individual or state or local officer from commencing a criminal, civil, professional disciplinary, or licensing action concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful in California.
- Authorizes a pharmacist to, at their discretion, dispense any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the prescriber or the name and address of the pharmacy otherwise required to be listed on the prescription label, if the label contains a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription. Requires such a pharmacist to maintain a log with the prescription numbers and the information otherwise required to be listed on the prescription label, and prohibits these records from being open to inspection by law enforcement, except as specified. Clarifies that the investigation of an activity that is punishable as a crime under the laws of California is not prohibited.
- Authorizes the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) to adopt regulations specific to mifepristone and other medication abortion drugs, including exempting those drugs from certain requirements if the drugs are no longer approved by the FDA.
- Prohibits CDPH from taking criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a clinic or health facility for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain acts relating to medication abortion drugs.
- Requires the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to update provider enrollment requirements and procedures for remote service providers who offer reproductive health care services exclusively thorough telehealth modalities.
- Prohibits a health care service plan contract or a group or individual disability insurance policy that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, regardless of its FDA approval status.
- Declares that certain provisions of the bill are severable and that if any provision is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
FISCAL EFFECT:
- The Osteopathic Medical Board of California estimates this bill would result in five additional enforcement cases per year, at an ongoing cost of $25,015 per year, which would be absorbable.
- The California State Board of Pharmacy anticipates minor and absorbable costs to provide education about the law.
- Minor and absorbable costs to DMHC.
- Costs of an unknown, but likely absorbable, amount to DHCS and CDPH.
COMMENTS:
Purpose. This bill is co-sponsored by Attorney General Rob Bonta, Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis, State Treasurer Fiona Ma, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, ACCESS Reproductive Justice, Reproductive Freedom for All, Black Women for Wellness Action Project, TEACH, California Latinas for Reproductive Access, Unite for Reproductive and Gender Equity, Essential Access Health, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Health Law Program, Hey Jane, and the Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine. According to the author:
For years, California has promoted access to reproductive health care without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers. However, recent lawsuits and actions by the federal government are exploring ways to limit states’ ability to provide medication abortion drugs, posing a threat to Californians’ constitutional right to reproductive freedom. AB 260 enhances access to medication abortion in California by protecting health care providers, facilities, and patients who access abortion medication, while also expanding overall access to reproductive health care. This bill ensures that the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, secured by the California Constitution, remains protected.
Related Legislation. AB 54 (Krell) would establish the Access to Safe Abortion Care Act, which would prohibit a manufacturer, distributor, authorized health care provider, pharmacist, or individual from being subject to civil or criminal liability, or professional disciplinary action, for accessing, mailing, shipping, receiving, transporting, distributing, dispensing, or administering mifepristone or misoprostol on or after January 1, 2020, in accordance with state law, applicable and accepted standards of care, and good faith compliance with the provisions of the bill. AB 54 is pending on the Assembly floor.
Analysis Prepared by: Allegra Kim / APPR. / (916) 319-2081
Date of Hearing: April 29, 2025
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS
Marc Berman, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 260
Author:(Aguiar-Curry) – As Amended Ver:March 17, 2025
NOTE: This bill is double referred and previously passed the Assembly Committee on Health on a 12-1-2 vote.
SUBJECT: Sexual and reproductive health care.
SUMMARY: Protects the authority of a licensed health care professional to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer mifepristone and other medication abortion drugs; authorizes a pharmacist to dispense those drugs without the name of the prescriber or the name and address of the pharmacy on the prescription label, subject to certain requirements; and makes additional technical and conforming changes to recognize the constitutional right to receive abortion care in California.
EXISTING LAW:
- Provides that the State of California shall not deny or interfere with an individual’s reproductive freedom in their most intimate decisions, which includes their fundamental right to choose to have an abortion and their fundamental right to choose or refuse contraceptives. (California Constitution, Article I, § 1.1)
- Enacts the Reproductive Privacy Act. (Health and Safety Code (HSC) §§ 123460 et seq.)
- Finds and declares that every individual possesses a fundamental right of privacy with respect to personal reproductive decisions, including whether to choose to bear a child or to choose to obtain an abortion. (HSC § 123462)
- Defines “abortion” as any medical treatment intended to induce the termination of a pregnancy except for the purpose of producing a live birth. (HSC § 123464)
- Prohibits the state from denying or interfering with a woman’s right to choose or obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the woman. (HSC § 123466)
- Protects individuals from civil or criminal liability based solely on their actions to aid or assist a pregnant person in exercising their rights under the Reproductive Privacy Act with the pregnant person’s voluntary consent. (HSC § 123467)
- Provides that a law of another state is contrary to the public policy of California if the law authorizes a person to bring a civil action against a person who receives or seeks an abortion; performs, provides, or induces an abortion; or engages in related acts. (HSC § 123467.5)
- Expressly provides that an abortion is unauthorized if performed by someone other than the pregnant person or a health care provider authorized to perform an abortion pursuant to state law, or if the fetus is considered viable, and the continuation of the pregnancy posed no risk to life or health of the pregnant person, in the good faith medical judgment of the physician. (HSC § 123468)
- Provides that California law governs in any action in the state against a person who provides or receives reproductive health care services if the provider was located in California or any other state where the care was legal at the time of the challenged conduct. (HSC § 123468.5)
- Establishes the Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) within the Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency. (Business and Professions Code (BPC) § 100)
- Enumerates various regulatory boards, bureaus, committees, and commissions under the DCA’s jurisdiction, including healing arts boards under Division 2. (BPC § 101)
- Prohibits a licensee of a healing arts board from obstructing a patient in obtaining a legally prescribed or ordered drug or device, including emergency contraception drug therapy and self-administered hormonal contraceptives. (BPC § 733)
- Prohibits a licensed health facility from denying, removing, or restricting the staff privileges of a licensee of a healing arts board on the basis of a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or disciplinary action in another state that was based solely on the application of another state’s law that interferes with a person’s right to receive sensitive services, including sexual and reproductive health care, that would be lawful in California. (BPC § 805.9)
- Prohibits healing arts boards from denying an application for licensure or disciplining a licensee on the basis of a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or disciplinary action in another state that was based solely on the application of another state’s law that interferes with a person’s right to receive sensitive services, including sexual and reproductive health care, that would be lawful in California, regardless of the patient’s location. (BPC § 850.1)
- Requires the specified healing arts boards to expedite the licensure process for applicants who demonstrate that they intend to provide abortions within the scope of practice of their license. (BPC § 870)
- Prohibits specified healing arts boards from denying an application for licensure or suspending or revoking a license solely because the licensee performed an abortion in accordance with the Reproductive Privacy Act and their respective practice act, including abortions performed in other states that have banned or restricted abortion. (BPC § 2253)
- Establishes the California State Board of Pharmacy (BOP) within the DCA to administer and enforce the Pharmacy Law. (BPC §§ 4000 et seq.)
- Defines “pharmacist” as a person to whom a license has been issued by the BOP which is required for any person to manufacture, compound, furnish, sell, or dispense a dangerous drug or dangerous device, or to dispense or compound a prescription. (BPC § 4036)
- Declares that “pharmacy practice is continually evolving to include more sophisticated and comprehensive patient care activities.” (BPC § 4050)
- Authorizes a pharmacist to do all of the following, among other permissible activities, as part of their scope of practice:
- Provide consultation, training, and education to patients about drug therapy, disease management, and disease prevention.
- Provide professional information, including clinical or pharmacological information, advice, or consultation to other health care professionals, and participate in multidisciplinary review of patient progress, including appropriate access to medical records.
- Order and interpret tests for the purpose of monitoring and managing the efficacy and toxicity of drug therapies in coordination with the patient’s provider or prescriber.
- Administer immunizations pursuant to a protocol with a prescriber.
- Furnish emergency contraception drug therapy, self-administered hormonal contraceptives, HIV preexposure and postexposure prophylaxis, and nicotine replacement products, subject to specified requirements.
- Administer drugs and biological products that have been ordered by a prescriber.
- (BPC § 4052)
- Authorizes a pharmacist to perform the following procedures or functions in certain licensed health care facilities in accordance with policies, procedures, or protocols developed by health professionals, including physicians, pharmacists, and registered nurses, with the concurrence of the facility administrator:
- Ordering or performing routine drug therapy-related patient assessment procedures including temperature, pulse, and respiration.
- Ordering drug therapy-related laboratory tests.
- Administering drugs and biologicals by injection pursuant to a prescriber’s order.
- Initiating or adjusting the drug regimen of a patient pursuant to an order or authorization made by the patient’s prescriber and in accordance with the policies, procedures, or protocols of the licensed health care facility.
- (BPC § 4052.2)
- Authorizes a pharmacist to furnish self-administered hormonal contraceptives in accordance with standardized procedures or protocols developed and approved by both the BOP and the Medical Board of California in consultation with the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the California Pharmacists Association, and other appropriate entities, and sets additional requirements for the furnishing of self-administered hormonal contraceptives by pharmacists. (BPC § 4052.3)
- Authorizes a pharmacist to initiate, adjust, or discontinue drug therapy for a patient under a collaborative practice agreement with any health care provider with appropriate prescriptive authority. (BPC § 4052.6)
- Requires pharmacists to dispense prescriptions in containers that are labeled with specified information, including the trade name or generic name of the drug, the directions for use of the drug, the name of the patient or patients, the name of the prescriber, the date of issue, and the name and address of the pharmacy, among other required information. (BPC § 4076)
THIS BILL:
- Repeals various obsolete provisions of law referencing criminal abortions and other constitutionally invalidated restrictions on abortion access.
- Protects a healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs from a civil or criminal action or disciplinary or other administrative proceeding solely on the basis that the practitioner prescribed, furnished, ordered, or administered brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
- Declares that the authority of a healing arts practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion is the practice of medicine, and the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the ability of a practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion if that action is lawful under the laws of the state, are against the public policy of California.
- Prohibits healing arts boards from denying a license or taking disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state, including in circumstances where that protected activity resulted in criminal conviction or discipline in another state.
- Similarly prohibits an individual or state or local officer from commencing a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
- Authorizes a pharmacist to, at their discretion, dispense brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the prescriber or the name and address of the pharmacy otherwise required to be listed on the prescription label, if the label contains a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
- Requires a pharmacist who dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion to maintain a log with the prescription numbers and the information otherwise required to be listed on the prescription label; provides that these records shall not be open to inspection by law enforcement without a valid, court-issued subpoena but that the investigation of an activity that is punishable as a crime under the laws of California is not prohibited, provided that records are not shared with an individual or entity from another state.
- Requires a pharmacist to inform the patient that the pharmacist is dispensing brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion under the labeling exemption.
- Authorizes the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) to adopt regulations specific to mifepristone and other medication abortion drugs, including exempting those drugs from certain requirements if the drugs are no longer approved by the FDA.
- Prohibits the CDPH from taking criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a clinic or health facility for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs.
- Requires the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to update provider enrollment requirements and procedures for remote service providers who offer reproductive health care services exclusively thorough telehealth modalities.
- Prohibits a health care service plan contract or a group or individual disability insurance policy that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, regardless of its FDA approval status.
- Declares that certain provisions of the bill are severable and that if any provision is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown; this bill is keyed fiscal by the Legislative Counsel.
COMMENTS:
Purpose. This bill is co-sponsored by Attorney General Rob Bonta, Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis, State Treasurer Fiona Ma, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, ACCESS Reproductive Justice, Reproductive Freedom for All, Black Women for Wellness Action Project, TEACH, California Latinas for Reproductive Access, Unite for Reproductive and Gender Equity, Essential Access Health, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Health Law Program, Hey Jane, and the Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine. According to the author:
For years, California has promoted access to reproductive health care without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers. However, recent lawsuits and actions by the federal government are exploring ways to limit states’ ability to provide medication abortion drugs, posing a threat to Californians’ constitutional right to reproductive freedom. AB 260 enhances access to medication abortion in California by protecting health care providers, facilities, and patients who access abortion medication, while also expanding overall access to reproductive health care. This bill ensures that the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, secured by the California Constitution, remains protected. When access to the fundamental right to health care is under attack across the nation, this bill proactively seeks to ensure that the existing standard of practice for medication abortion remains legal in California.
Background.
Abortion Rights in California. In 2002, the Legislature enacted the Reproductive Privacy Act, which recognized that every woman in California possesses the fundamental right to choose to bear a child or to obtain an abortion. Under the Reproductive Privacy Act, the state is prohibited from denying or interfering with a woman’s right to choose or obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the woman. The only restriction on abortion recognized by the Reproductive Privacy Act is when, in the good faith medical judgment of a physician, the fetus is viable and there is no risk to the life or health of the pregnant woman associated with the continuation of the pregnancy. Currently in California, medical providers who can perform abortions within their scope of practice are physicians and, under physician supervision, nurse practitioners, certified nurse-midwives, and physician assistants.
The Reproductive Privacy Act codified the right to choose whether to have an abortion as a form of exercising the implicit right to privacy under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, as previously affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States in Roe v. Wade, which found that Texas’s criminal abortion statute violated the Due Process Clause. The Court ruled in Roe that during the first trimester, “the abortion decision and its effectuation must be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman’s attending physician.” The Court ruled that during the second trimester, a state may only choose to “regulate the abortion procedure in ways that are reasonably related to maternal health,” but that states may ban abortion altogether during the third trimester, “except where it is necessary, in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother.”[1] This holding was later expanded upon in the Court’s 1992 decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which declared state laws to be unconstitutional if they placed an “undue burden” on access to abortion before fetal viability.[2]
However, recent judicial activism within the Court nationally imperiled the constitutional protections previously recognized in Roe. In 2021, the Texas Legislature passed Senate Bill 8, referred to as the Texas Heartbeat Act. That bill criminalized abortion after the detection of embryonic or fetal cardiac activity, essentially banning abortion after approximately six weeks. The constitutionality of the Texas Heartbeat Act was challenged in Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson, which sought to enforce the Roe precedent and overturn Senate Bill 8. However, the Court declined to enjoin the Texas Heartbeat Act, which many pro-choice advocates viewed as portending a future decision by the Court to overturn or severely diminish the constitutional rights guaranteed under Roe.
Subsequently, on December 1, 2021, the Court heard oral arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a case regarding a 2018 law in the State of Mississippi that banned abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy. Dobbs was a direct challenge to the legal precedents set in Roe and Casey and was the first time the Court ruled on the constitutional right to pre-viability abortion since Roe. On June 24, 2022, the Court published its ruling that abortion is not a right protected under the Constitution of the United States. This decision effectively overturned Roe and left the question of whether to ban abortion and other forms of reproductive care up to individual states.[3]
Immediately following the Court’s decision, State Senate President pro Tempore Toni Atkins sponsored Senate Constitutional Amendment 10, which placed a proposition on the 2022 ballot titled Constitutional Right to Reproductive Freedom. Proposition 1 explicitly made abortion and access to contraceptives a constitutional right in California. The ballot proposition passed with over 66 percent of voters in favor, formally enshrining the protections of Roe into the state’s constitution and securing essential reproductive rights for pregnant people in California.
While California law protects a pregnant person’s right to choose in a manner consistent with Roe, the Guttmacher Institute initially estimated that 26 states would likely seek to ban abortion with Roe overturned, resulting in 36 million women and other people who may become pregnant losing access to abortion care nationwide. This included 13 states with so-called “trigger ban” statutes, designed to immediately take effect following the Court’s invalidation of Roe, and a number of additional states with pre-Roe laws restricting abortion still in place.[4]
In spite of efforts by numerous states to ban or significantly restrict access to abortion, some medical professionals may still choose to provide abortions in defiance of those state laws, potentially including professionals licensed in California who may travel to other states to provide those health care services. Additionally, many residents of states that have limited abortion access may travel to states like California, where their rights remain undiminished.[5] Following news reports that the impending decision in Dobbs was likely to overturn the protections of Roe, Governor Gavin Newsom announced that California would “maintain and improve availability of safe and accessible reproductive health care services and prepare for a potential influx of people from other states seeking reproductive health care and abortion services.” This announcement included $1 million to launch a state-sponsored website, abortion.ca.gov, which provides both California residents and travelers from other states with information about their reproductive rights and how to seek abortion services in California.
Several states have acted to impose their abortion laws even when the services are performed in states that have remained consistent with the protections of Roe. The legislatures in Arkansas, South Carolina, Texas, Ohio, Missouri, and Alabama, for example, have all proposed or enacted laws to criminalize residents seeking or assisting those seeking abortions out-of-state. These state laws are arguably unconstitutional; in 2023, the United States Department of Justice filed a statement of interest in two consolidated lawsuits seeking to protect the right to interstate travel, including the right to travel to another state to obtain an abortion that is legal in the destination state. On the day that the Dobbs decision was officially published, the governors of California, Oregon and Washington announced a “Multi-State Commitment to defend access to reproductive health care, including abortion and contraceptives, and committed to protecting patients and doctors against efforts by other states to export their abortion bans to our states.”
To prepare for an anticipated surge in demand for abortion services following the Court’s decision in Dobbs, including from patients traveling from restrictive states, the Legislature enacted Assembly Bill 657 (Cooper) in 2022, sponsored by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists – District IX. AB 567 requires specified healing arts boards to expedite the licensure process for applicants who intend to provide abortions. To qualify, the applicant must provide a letter declaring the applicant’s intention to provide abortions and a letter from an employer or health care entity indicating that the applicant has accepted employment or entered into a contract to provide abortions, the applicant’s starting date, the location where the applicant will be providing abortions, and that the applicant will be providing abortions within the scope of practice of their license in accordance with the Reproductive Privacy Act.
The Legislature also enacted Assembly Bill 2626 (Calderon) in 2022 to provide reassurance to California health care professionals that they would not be subjected to discipline for continuing to provide abortion care and other reproductive services following the ruling in Dobbs. That bill reiterated that licensing boards may not subject licensed health care professionals to serious discipline for performing an abortion that is legal under California law, protecting the license of those who provide abortions in states that have banned abortion or to patients who have traveled from those states to California to seek care. While California licensing boards do not have direct jurisdiction over care provided in other states, they are notified when a licensee was either convicted of a crime in another state or subjected to discipline by another state’s licensing board. When notified, the California boards may decide whether to take disciplinary action. AB 2626 prohibited boards from suspending or revoking a license solely because the licensee performed an abortion in accordance with California law.
In 2023, Assembly Bill 1707 (Pacheco) was enacted to further protect health care professionals who perform abortions and other forms of care prohibited in other states that patients would have a right to receive in California. Specifically, the bill prohibited healing arts boards from denying or disciplining a licensee on the basis of a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or disciplinary action in another state based solely on the application of another state’s law that interferes with a person’s right to receive sensitive services that would be lawful if provided in California, including sexual and reproductive health care and gender affirming care. The bill also enacted similar prohibitions against discipline against health professionals by the CDPH and licensed health facilities.
In April 2024, Governor Newsom joined the California Legislative Women’s Caucus and other legislative leaders and health care advocates to announce plans to sponsor “urgency legislation to allow Arizona abortion providers to temporarily provide abortion care to patients from Arizona who travel to California for care.” The language in Senate Bill 233 (Skinner) was intended to be a “stopgap” to allow for Arizona physicians to provide their patients with abortion services prior to the date when an 1864 abortion ban was expected to be repealed. SB 233 went into effect immediately following its enactment on May 23, 2024 and subsequently became inoperative on December 1, 2024.
Access to Medication Abortion. Along with procedural abortions, medication can be administered to end a pregnancy. In September 2000, the FDA first approved the drug mifepristone for purposes of inducing a medication abortion during the early stages of pregnancy. Typically used in combination with misoprostol, mifepristone works by blocking the hormone progesterone, which causes the uterine lining to break down, thereby terminating the pregnancy. Prior to the drug’s formal approval, the FDA’s Advisory Committee for Reproductive Health Drugs found mifepristone to be safe and effective in inducing abortions early in pregnancy.[6]
The FDA has subsequently reaffirmed the safety and efficacy of mifepristone. In March 2016, the FDA approved an updated label for the drug that reflected widely recommended medication abortion protocols, which strengthened access in states with restrictions on medication abortion drugs. A generic version of mifepristone was approved by the FDA in April 2019. In January 2023, the FDA made modifications to the Mifepristone Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Program, further strengthening access to medication abortion while maintaining safety standards.
Despite repeated confirmation by experts that mifepristone is a safe and effective option for early abortion care, anti-choice activists have recently succeeded in creating uncertainty around the future of medication abortion access. In April 2023, a federal judge in Texas issued a ruling that sought to suspend the FDA’s approval of mifepristone, dubious arguing that the FDA had exceeded its authority in approving mifepristone without considering safety risks during the initial approval process. Governor Gavin Newsom publicly responded to this decision, declaring that the ruling “by an extremist judge pursuing a radical political agenda, ignores facts, science, and the law – putting the health of millions of women and girls at risk.” The Governor also announced that California had secured an emergency stockpile of mifepristone “to ensure California providers can continue to provide medication abortions without disruption.”
The case reached the Supreme Court of the United States, where it was initially considered to be likely that the Texas judge’s ruling would be upheld. In anticipation of this decision, it was announced that the Governor and legislative leaders would pursue actions to protect the ability of California pharmacists to dispense mifepristone “even if the Supreme Court suspends the drug’s FDA approval,” along with additional safeguards and privacy protections. However, shortly after that announcement, the Court ruled to stay the ruling of the Texas judge, providing temporary assurance that access to mifepristone would remain in place.
The Court once again considered challenges to the FDA’s approval of mifepristone for medication abortion when it heard arguments in Food and Drug Administration, et al., v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine in early 2024. California joined 22 other states in filing an amicus curiae brief on behalf of the FDA’s review process and its longstanding approval of mifepristone. The Court ultimately ruled that the coalition of anti-abortion activists did not have standing, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh writing an opinion that held that the FDA’s approval of mifepristone did not require doctors with religious objections to abortion to prescribe that medication.[7]
While efforts to undermine access to mifepristone have been repeatedly unsuccessful in the courts, anti-choice activists have continued to pursue actions to limit or punish the use of that medication. In late 2024, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued a New York physician for prescribing abortion medication to a Texas resident through telehealth. This litigation invokes a number of legal questions about the ability of states to shield practitioners and patients from draconian laws limiting access to abortion care through laws like those recently enacted in California.
This bill would seek to provide further reassurance that mifepristone will remain available in California and that health care professionals and their patients will be protected even if actions taken by activists, the courts, or the Trump Administration seek to prohibit or restrict medication abortion. The bill would unequivocally state that the authority of a healing arts practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion is the practice of medicine, and the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the ability of a practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion if that action is lawful under the laws of the state, are against the public policy of California. The bill would additionally protect healing arts licensees who prescribe, furnish, order, administer, or dispense mifepristone and related drugs from criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action.
Prescription Drug Container Labeling. Current law prohibits a pharmacist from dispensing a prescription unless they do so with a container that meets certain labeling requirements. Absent a small number of exemptions, every prescription drug container must be labeled with the following information:
- The drug’s trade name, or its generic name and manufacturer;
- Directions for the use of the drug;
- The name of the patient or patients;
- The name of the prescriber or other practitioner operating under a standardized procedure or protocol;
- The date of issue;
- The name and address of the pharmacy and the prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription;
- The strength and quantity of the drug or drugs dispensed;
- The expiration date of the effectiveness of the drug dispensed;
- The condition or purpose for which the drug was prescribed, if indicated;
- A physical description of the dispensed medication, including its color, shape, and any identification code that appears on the tablets or capsules, except in certain cases.
- A notice that states “Caution: Opioid. Risk of overdose and addiction” when the medication is an opioid dispensed to a patient for outpatient use.
In addition, the California Patient Medication Safety Act directed the BOP to promulgate further regulations to require a “standardized, patient-centered, prescription drug label on all prescription medicine dispensed to patients in California.” The resulting language enacted in 16 C.C.R. § 1707.5 specifies that drug container label information must be clustered into one area of the label comprising at least 50 percent of the label, and that each item must be printed in at least a 12-point sans serif typeface. The regulations provide template language and recommend formatting to provide added emphasis.
This bill would allow for a pharmacist to choose to dispense brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the prescriber or the name and address of the pharmacy, as currently required, if the prescription is labeled with a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription. This language is in part connected to the lawsuit brought by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton against the physician in New York, whose prescribing of mifepristone was identified through the discovery of prescription bottles in the patient’s home. Legislation establishing a similar exemption from prescription container labeling requirements was signed into law by New York Governor Kathy Hochul in February 2025. The author believes that similar language is necessary to ensure that California health care practitioners are also fully protected from attempted prosecution.
Current Related Legislation. AB 54 (Krell) would establish the Access to Safe Abortion Care Act, which would prohibit a manufacturer, distributor, authorized health care provider, pharmacist, or individual from being subject to civil or criminal liability, or professional disciplinary action, for accessing, mailing, shipping, receiving, transporting, distributing, dispensing, or administering mifepristone or misoprostol on or after January 1, 2020, in accordance with state law, applicable and accepted standards of care, and good faith compliance with the provisions of the bill. This bill is pending in the Assembly Committee on Judiciary.
Prior Related Legislation. SB 233 (Skinner), Chapter 11, Statutes of 2024 established a temporary registration program to allow for physicians licensed to practice medicine in Arizona to perform abortions or provide abortion-related care in California to patients traveling from Arizona for that care.
SB 385 (Atkins), Chapter 178, Statutes of 2023 expanded the training options for physician assistants seeking to perform abortions by aspiration techniques.
AB 1707 (Pacheco), Chapter 258, Statutes of 2023 prohibited licensed health care professionals, clinics, and health facilities from being denied a license or subjected to discipline on the basis of a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or disciplinary action imposed by another state based solely on the application of a law that interferes with a person's right to receive sensitive services that would be lawful in California.
AB 1369 (Bauer-Kahan), Chapter 837, Statutes of 2023 authorized an out-of-state physician to practice medicine in California without a California license if the practice is limited to delivering health care via telehealth to a patient who has an immediate life-threatening disease or condition.
AB 1666 (Bauer-Kahan), Chapter 42, Statutes of 2022 declared that another state’s law authorizing a civil action against a person or entity that receives or seeks, performs or induces, or aids or abets the performance of an abortion, or who attempts or intends to engage in those actions, is contrary to the public policy of this state.
AB 657 (Cooper), Chapter 560, Statutes of 2022 required specified healing arts boards to expedite the license application for an applicant who demonstrates that they intend to provide abortions.
AB 2626 (Calderon), Chapter 565, Statutes of 2022 prohibited specified licensing boards from suspending, revoking, or denying a license solely for performing an abortion that is lawful in California in accordance with the licensee’s practice act.
AB 1242 (Bauer-Kahan), Chapter 627, Statutes of 2022 prohibited law enforcement and specified corporations from providing information to out-of-state entities regarding a lawful abortion under California law.
AB 2091 (Bonta), Chapter 628, Statutes of 2022 protected the private information of individuals who seek or consider an abortion, including a prohibition against the sharing of reproductive health care information in response to subpoenas related to out-of-state anti-abortion statutes.
SCA 10 (Atkins), Res. Chapter 97, Statutes of 2022 enacted a constitutional amendment to provide that the state shall not deny or interfere with an individual's reproductive freedom in their most intimate decisions, which includes their fundamental right to have an abortion.
AB 1264 (Petrie-Norris), Chapter 741, Statutes of 2019 clarified that an “appropriate prior examination” does not require a synchronous interaction between a provider and a patient for purposes of prescribing, furnishing, or dispensing self-administered hormonal contraceptives.
SB 1301 (Kuehl), Chapter 385, Statutes of 2002 enacted the Reproductive to Privacy Act to prohibit the state’s denial or interference with a woman’s right to choose or obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus, or when necessary to protect the life or health of the woman.
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT:
The co-sponsors of this bill submitted a letter collectively expressing support for the bill, including Attorney General Rob Bonta, Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis, State Treasurer Fiona Ma, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, ACCESS Reproductive Justice, Reproductive Freedom for All, Black Women for Wellness Action Project, TEACH, California Latinas for Reproductive Access, Unite for Reproductive and Gender Equity, Essential Access Health, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Health Law Program, Hey Jane, and the Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine. The coalition letter states: “When access to the fundamental right to health care is under attack across the nation, this bill proactively codifies the existing standard of practice for medication abortion so that it remains legal in California, regardless of federal actions. AB 260 reassures Californians that their rights to essential health care and bodily autonomy are – and will remain – protected. It is for these reasons that we are proud to co-sponsor this legislation.”
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California (PPAC), one of the bill’s co-sponsors, also writes separately in support of the bill: “Medication abortion, and broad access to it, allows individuals to receive safe and effective abortion care in a least invasive manner. Any federal threats to restrict medication abortion and the drugs used are not only dangerous and risky, but also a direct attack on the state’s constitutional right to reproductive freedom. Mifepristone, a drug used in combination with a second drug – misoprostol – to terminate a pregnancy through medication abortion, was approved by the FDA in 2000. Accordingly, scientists have studied the safety of mifepristone for over 25 years, and these decades of evidence show that medication abortion and the drugs used in the process are safe and effective.” PPAC further writes: “AB 260 protects medication abortion by establishing that the current standard of care for the use of mifepristone will remain legal in this state, protecting providers that legally provide mifepristone, requiring the continuation of existing coverage for medication abortion, and expanding access to reproductive health care through telehealth. Proactively taking steps to protect care will help to ensure that there will not be an interruption of access to medication abortion care in California.”
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION:
There is no opposition on file.
REGISTERED SUPPORT:
Attorney General Rob Bonta (Co-Sponsor)
Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis (Co-Sponsor)
State Treasurer Fiona Ma (Co-Sponsor)
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California (Co-Sponsor)
ACCESS Reproductive Justice (Co-Sponsor)
Reproductive Freedom for All (Co-Sponsor)
Black Women for Wellness Action Project (Co-Sponsor)
TEACH (Co-Sponsor)
California Latinas for Reproductive Access (Co-Sponsor)
Unite for Reproductive and Gender Equity (URGE) (Co-Sponsor)
Essential Access Health (Co-Sponsor)
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Co-Sponsor)
National Health Law Program (Co-Sponsor)
Hey Jane (Co-Sponsor)
The Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine (Co-Sponsor)
California Medical Association
California Nurse Midwives Association
California Pan - Ethnic Health Network
California Pharmacists Association
Parent Voices California
REGISTERED OPPOSITION:
1 Individual
Analysis Prepared by: Robert Sumner / B. & P. / (916) 319-3301
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) ↑
Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992) ↑
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U.S. 215 (2022) ↑
https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2022/06/13-states-have-abortion-trigger-bans-heres-what-happens-when-roe-overturned ↑
https://www.guttmacher.org/2023/12/high-toll-us-abortion-bans-nearly-one-five-patients-now-traveling-out-state-abortion-care ↑
“FDA panel finds mifepristone safe and effective.” Reproductive freedom news vol. 5,13 (1996). ↑
FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, 602 U.S. ___ (2024). ↑
Date of Hearing:
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS
Marc Berman, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 260
Author:(Aguiar-Curry) – As Amended Ver:March 17, 2025
NOTE: This bill is double referred and previously passed the Assembly Committee on Health on a 12-1-2 vote.
SUBJECT: Sexual and reproductive health care.
SUMMARY: Protects the authority of a licensed health care professional to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer mifepristone and other medication abortion drugs; authorizes a pharmacist to dispense those drugs without the name of the prescriber or the name and address of the pharmacy on the prescription label, subject to certain requirements; and makes additional technical and conforming changes to recognize the constitutional right to receive abortion care in California.
EXISTING LAW:
- Provides that the State of California shall not deny or interfere with an individual’s reproductive freedom in their most intimate decisions, which includes their fundamental right to choose to have an abortion and their fundamental right to choose or refuse contraceptives. (California Constitution, Article I, § 1.1)
- Enacts the Reproductive Privacy Act. (Health and Safety Code (HSC) §§ 123460 et seq.)
- Finds and declares that every individual possesses a fundamental right of privacy with respect to personal reproductive decisions, including whether to choose to bear a child or to choose to obtain an abortion. (HSC § 123462)
- Defines “abortion” as any medical treatment intended to induce the termination of a pregnancy except for the purpose of producing a live birth. (HSC § 123464)
- Prohibits the state from denying or interfering with a woman’s right to choose or obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the woman. (HSC § 123466)
- Protects individuals from civil or criminal liability based solely on their actions to aid or assist a pregnant person in exercising their rights under the Reproductive Privacy Act with the pregnant person’s voluntary consent. (HSC § 123467)
- Provides that a law of another state is contrary to the public policy of California if the law authorizes a person to bring a civil action against a person who receives or seeks an abortion; performs, provides, or induces an abortion; or engages in related acts. (HSC § 123467.5)
- Expressly provides that an abortion is unauthorized if performed by someone other than the pregnant person or a health care provider authorized to perform an abortion pursuant to state law, or if the fetus is considered viable, and the continuation of the pregnancy posed no risk to life or health of the pregnant person, in the good faith medical judgment of the physician. (HSC § 123468)
- Provides that California law governs in any action in the state against a person who provides or receives reproductive health care services if the provider was located in California or any other state where the care was legal at the time of the challenged conduct. (HSC § 123468.5)
- Establishes the Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) within the Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency. (Business and Professions Code (BPC) § 100)
- Enumerates various regulatory boards, bureaus, committees, and commissions under the DCA’s jurisdiction, including healing arts boards under Division 2. (BPC § 101)
- Prohibits a licensee of a healing arts board from obstructing a patient in obtaining a legally prescribed or ordered drug or device, including emergency contraception drug therapy and self-administered hormonal contraceptives. (BPC § 733)
- Prohibits a licensed health facility from denying, removing, or restricting the staff privileges of a licensee of a healing arts board on the basis of a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or disciplinary action in another state that was based solely on the application of another state’s law that interferes with a person’s right to receive sensitive services, including sexual and reproductive health care, that would be lawful in California. (BPC § 805.9)
- Prohibits healing arts boards from denying an application for licensure or disciplining a licensee on the basis of a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or disciplinary action in another state that was based solely on the application of another state’s law that interferes with a person’s right to receive sensitive services, including sexual and reproductive health care, that would be lawful in California, regardless of the patient’s location. (BPC § 850.1)
- Requires the specified healing arts boards to expedite the licensure process for applicants who demonstrate that they intend to provide abortions within the scope of practice of their license. (BPC § 870)
- Prohibits specified healing arts boards from denying an application for licensure or suspending or revoking a license solely because the licensee performed an abortion in accordance with the Reproductive Privacy Act and their respective practice act, including abortions performed in other states that have banned or restricted abortion. (BPC § 2253)
- Establishes the California State Board of Pharmacy (BOP) within the DCA to administer and enforce the Pharmacy Law. (BPC §§ 4000 et seq.)
- Defines “pharmacist” as a person to whom a license has been issued by the BOP which is required for any person to manufacture, compound, furnish, sell, or dispense a dangerous drug or dangerous device, or to dispense or compound a prescription. (BPC § 4036)
- Declares that “pharmacy practice is continually evolving to include more sophisticated and comprehensive patient care activities.” (BPC § 4050)
- Authorizes a pharmacist to do all of the following, among other permissible activities, as part of their scope of practice:
- Provide consultation, training, and education to patients about drug therapy, disease management, and disease prevention.
- Provide professional information, including clinical or pharmacological information, advice, or consultation to other health care professionals, and participate in multidisciplinary review of patient progress, including appropriate access to medical records.
- Order and interpret tests for the purpose of monitoring and managing the efficacy and toxicity of drug therapies in coordination with the patient’s provider or prescriber.
- Administer immunizations pursuant to a protocol with a prescriber.
- Furnish emergency contraception drug therapy, self-administered hormonal contraceptives, HIV preexposure and postexposure prophylaxis, and nicotine replacement products, subject to specified requirements.
- Administer drugs and biological products that have been ordered by a prescriber.
- (BPC § 4052)
- Authorizes a pharmacist to perform the following procedures or functions in certain licensed health care facilities in accordance with policies, procedures, or protocols developed by health professionals, including physicians, pharmacists, and registered nurses, with the concurrence of the facility administrator:
- Ordering or performing routine drug therapy-related patient assessment procedures including temperature, pulse, and respiration.
- Ordering drug therapy-related laboratory tests.
- Administering drugs and biologicals by injection pursuant to a prescriber’s order.
- Initiating or adjusting the drug regimen of a patient pursuant to an order or authorization made by the patient’s prescriber and in accordance with the policies, procedures, or protocols of the licensed health care facility.
- (BPC § 4052.2)
- Authorizes a pharmacist to furnish self-administered hormonal contraceptives in accordance with standardized procedures or protocols developed and approved by both the BOP and the Medical Board of California in consultation with the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the California Pharmacists Association, and other appropriate entities, and sets additional requirements for the furnishing of self-administered hormonal contraceptives by pharmacists. (BPC § 4052.3)
- Authorizes a pharmacist to initiate, adjust, or discontinue drug therapy for a patient under a collaborative practice agreement with any health care provider with appropriate prescriptive authority. (BPC § 4052.6)
- Requires pharmacists to dispense prescriptions in containers that are labeled with specified information, including the trade name or generic name of the drug, the directions for use of the drug, the name of the patient or patients, the name of the prescriber, the date of issue, and the name and address of the pharmacy, among other required information. (BPC § 4076)
THIS BILL:
- Repeals various obsolete provisions of law referencing criminal abortions and other constitutionally invalidated restrictions on abortion access.
- Protects a healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs from a civil or criminal action or disciplinary or other administrative proceeding solely on the basis that the practitioner prescribed, furnished, ordered, or administered brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
- Declares that the authority of a healing arts practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion is the practice of medicine, and the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the ability of a practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion if that action is lawful under the laws of the state, are against the public policy of California.
- Prohibits healing arts boards from denying a license or taking disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state, including in circumstances where that protected activity resulted in criminal conviction or discipline in another state.
- Similarly prohibits an individual or state or local officer from commencing a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
- Authorizes a pharmacist to, at their discretion, dispense brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the prescriber or the name and address of the pharmacy otherwise required to be listed on the prescription label, if the label contains a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
- Requires a pharmacist who dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion to maintain a log with the prescription numbers and the information otherwise required to be listed on the prescription label; provides that these records shall not be open to inspection by law enforcement without a valid, court-issued subpoena but that the investigation of an activity that is punishable as a crime under the laws of California is not prohibited, provided that records are not shared with an individual or entity from another state.
- Requires a pharmacist to inform the patient that the pharmacist is dispensing brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion under the labeling exemption.
- Authorizes the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) to adopt regulations specific to mifepristone and other medication abortion drugs, including exempting those drugs from certain requirements if the drugs are no longer approved by the FDA.
- Prohibits the CDPH from taking criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a clinic or health facility for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs.
- Requires the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to update provider enrollment requirements and procedures for remote service providers who offer reproductive health care services exclusively thorough telehealth modalities.
- Prohibits a health care service plan contract or a group or individual disability insurance policy that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, regardless of its FDA approval status.
- Declares that certain provisions of the bill are severable and that if any provision is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown; this bill is keyed fiscal by the Legislative Counsel.
COMMENTS:
Purpose. This bill is co-sponsored by Attorney General Rob Bonta, Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis, State Treasurer Fiona Ma, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, ACCESS Reproductive Justice, Reproductive Freedom for All, Black Women for Wellness Action Project, TEACH, California Latinas for Reproductive Access, Unite for Reproductive and Gender Equity, Essential Access Health, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Health Law Program, Hey Jane, and the Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine. According to the author:
For years, California has promoted access to reproductive health care without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers. However, recent lawsuits and actions by the federal government are exploring ways to limit states’ ability to provide medication abortion drugs, posing a threat to Californians’ constitutional right to reproductive freedom. AB 260 enhances access to medication abortion in California by protecting health care providers, facilities, and patients who access abortion medication, while also expanding overall access to reproductive health care. This bill ensures that the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, secured by the California Constitution, remains protected. When access to the fundamental right to health care is under attack across the nation, this bill proactively seeks to ensure that the existing standard of practice for medication abortion remains legal in California.
Background.
Abortion Rights in California. In 2002, the Legislature enacted the Reproductive Privacy Act, which recognized that every woman in California possesses the fundamental right to choose to bear a child or to obtain an abortion. Under the Reproductive Privacy Act, the state is prohibited from denying or interfering with a woman’s right to choose or obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the woman. The only restriction on abortion recognized by the Reproductive Privacy Act is when, in the good faith medical judgment of a physician, the fetus is viable and there is no risk to the life or health of the pregnant woman associated with the continuation of the pregnancy. Currently in California, medical providers who can perform abortions within their scope of practice are physicians and, under physician supervision, nurse practitioners, certified nurse-midwives, and physician assistants.
The Reproductive Privacy Act codified the right to choose whether to have an abortion as a form of exercising the implicit right to privacy under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, as previously affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States in Roe v. Wade, which found that Texas’s criminal abortion statute violated the Due Process Clause. The Court ruled in Roe that during the first trimester, “the abortion decision and its effectuation must be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman’s attending physician.” The Court ruled that during the second trimester, a state may only choose to “regulate the abortion procedure in ways that are reasonably related to maternal health,” but that states may ban abortion altogether during the third trimester, “except where it is necessary, in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother.”[1] This holding was later expanded upon in the Court’s 1992 decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which declared state laws to be unconstitutional if they placed an “undue burden” on access to abortion before fetal viability.[2]
However, recent judicial activism within the Court nationally imperiled the constitutional protections previously recognized in Roe. In 2021, the Texas Legislature passed Senate Bill 8, referred to as the Texas Heartbeat Act. That bill criminalized abortion after the detection of embryonic or fetal cardiac activity, essentially banning abortion after approximately six weeks. The constitutionality of the Texas Heartbeat Act was challenged in Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson, which sought to enforce the Roe precedent and overturn Senate Bill 8. However, the Court declined to enjoin the Texas Heartbeat Act, which many pro-choice advocates viewed as portending a future decision by the Court to overturn or severely diminish the constitutional rights guaranteed under Roe.
Subsequently, on December 1, 2021, the Court heard oral arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a case regarding a 2018 law in the State of Mississippi that banned abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy. Dobbs was a direct challenge to the legal precedents set in Roe and Casey and was the first time the Court ruled on the constitutional right to pre-viability abortion since Roe. On June 24, 2022, the Court published its ruling that abortion is not a right protected under the Constitution of the United States. This decision effectively overturned Roe and left the question of whether to ban abortion and other forms of reproductive care up to individual states.[3]
Immediately following the Court’s decision, State Senate President pro Tempore Toni Atkins sponsored Senate Constitutional Amendment 10, which placed a proposition on the 2022 ballot titled Constitutional Right to Reproductive Freedom. Proposition 1 explicitly made abortion and access to contraceptives a constitutional right in California. The ballot proposition passed with over 66 percent of voters in favor, formally enshrining the protections of Roe into the state’s constitution and securing essential reproductive rights for pregnant people in California.
While California law protects a pregnant person’s right to choose in a manner consistent with Roe, the Guttmacher Institute initially estimated that 26 states would likely seek to ban abortion with Roe overturned, resulting in 36 million women and other people who may become pregnant losing access to abortion care nationwide.[4] This included 13 states with so-called “trigger ban” statutes, designed to immediately take effect following the Court’s invalidation of Roe, and a number of additional states with pre-Roe laws restricting abortion still in place.[5]
In spite of efforts by numerous states to ban or significantly restrict access to abortion, some medical professionals may still choose to provide abortions in defiance of those state laws, potentially including professionals licensed in California who may travel to other states to provide those health care services. Additionally, many residents of states that have limited abortion access may travel to states like California, where their rights remain undiminished.[6] Following news reports that the impending decision in Dobbs was likely to overturn the protections of Roe, Governor Gavin Newsom announced that California would “maintain and improve availability of safe and accessible reproductive health care services and prepare for a potential influx of people from other states seeking reproductive health care and abortion services.” This announcement included $1 million to launch a state-sponsored website, abortion.ca.gov, which provides both California residents and travelers from other states with information about their reproductive rights and how to seek abortion services in California.
Several states have acted to impose their abortion laws even when the services are performed in states that have remained consistent with the protections of Roe. The legislatures in Arkansas, South Carolina, Texas, Ohio, Missouri, and Alabama, for example, have all proposed or enacted laws to criminalize residents seeking or assisting those seeking abortions out-of-state. These state laws are arguably unconstitutional; in 2023, the United States Department of Justice filed a statement of interest in two consolidated lawsuits seeking to protect the right to interstate travel, including the right to travel to another state to obtain an abortion that is legal in the destination state. On the day that the Dobbs decision was officially published, the governors of California, Oregon and Washington announced a “Multi-State Commitment to defend access to reproductive health care, including abortion and contraceptives, and committed to protecting patients and doctors against efforts by other states to export their abortion bans to our states.”
To prepare for an anticipated surge in demand for abortion services following the Court’s decision in Dobbs, including from patients traveling from restrictive states, the Legislature enacted Assembly Bill 657 (Cooper) in 2022, sponsored by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists – District IX. AB 567 requires specified healing arts boards to expedite the licensure process for applicants who intend to provide abortions. To qualify, the applicant must provide a letter declaring the applicant’s intention to provide abortions and a letter from an employer or health care entity indicating that the applicant has accepted employment or entered into a contract to provide abortions, the applicant’s starting date, the location where the applicant will be providing abortions, and that the applicant will be providing abortions within the scope of practice of their license in accordance with the Reproductive Privacy Act.
The Legislature also enacted Assembly Bill 2626 (Calderon) in 2022 to provide reassurance to California health care professionals that they would not be subjected to discipline for continuing to provide abortion care and other reproductive services following the ruling in Dobbs. That bill reiterated that licensing boards may not subject licensed health care professionals to serious discipline for performing an abortion that is legal under California law, protecting the license of those who provide abortions in states that have banned abortion or to patients who have traveled from those states to California to seek care. While California licensing boards do not have direct jurisdiction over care provided in other states, they are notified when a licensee was either convicted of a crime in another state or subjected to discipline by another state’s licensing board. When notified, the California boards may decide whether to take disciplinary action. AB 2626 prohibited boards from suspending or revoking a license solely because the licensee performed an abortion in accordance with California law.
In 2023, Assembly Bill 1707 (Pacheco) was enacted to further protect health care professionals who perform abortions and other forms of care prohibited in other states that patients would have a right to receive in California. Specifically, the bill prohibited healing arts boards from denying or disciplining a licensee on the basis of a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or disciplinary action in another state based solely on the application of another state’s law that interferes with a person’s right to receive sensitive services that would be lawful if provided in California, including sexual and reproductive health care and gender affirming care. The bill also enacted similar prohibitions against discipline against health professionals by the CDPH and licensed health facilities.
In April 2024, Governor Newsom joined the California Legislative Women’s Caucus and other legislative leaders and health care advocates to announce plans to sponsor “urgency legislation to allow Arizona abortion providers to temporarily provide abortion care to patients from Arizona who travel to California for care.” The language in Senate Bill 233 (Skinner) was intended to be a “stopgap” to allow for Arizona physicians to provide their patients with abortion services prior to the date when an 1864 abortion ban was expected to be repealed. SB 233 went into effect immediately following its enactment on May 23, 2024 and subsequently became inoperative on December 1, 2024.
Access to Medication Abortion. Along with procedural abortions, medication can be administered to end a pregnancy. In September 2000, the FDA first approved the drug mifepristone for purposes of inducing a medication abortion during the early stages of pregnancy. Typically used in combination with misoprostol, mifepristone works by blocking the hormone progesterone, which causes the uterine lining to break down, thereby terminating the pregnancy. Prior to the drug’s formal approval, the FDA’s Advisory Committee for Reproductive Health Drugs found mifepristone to be safe and effective in inducing abortions early in pregnancy.[7]
The FDA has subsequently reaffirmed the safety and efficacy of mifepristone. In March 2016, the FDA approved an updated label for the drug that reflected widely recommended medication abortion protocols, which strengthened access in states with restrictions on medication abortion drugs. A generic version of mifepristone was approved by the FDA in April 2019. In January 2023, the FDA made modifications to the Mifepristone Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Program, further strengthening access to medication abortion while maintaining safety standards.
Despite repeated confirmation by experts that mifepristone is a safe and effective option for early abortion care, anti-choice activists have recently succeeded in creating uncertainty around the future of medication abortion access. In April 2023, a federal judge in Texas issued a ruling that sought to suspend the FDA’s approval of mifepristone, dubious arguing that the FDA had exceeded its authority in approving mifepristone without considering safety risks during the initial approval process. Governor Gavin Newsom publicly responded to this decision, declaring that the ruling “by an extremist judge pursuing a radical political agenda, ignores facts, science, and the law – putting the health of millions of women and girls at risk.” The Governor also announced that California had secured an emergency stockpile of mifepristone “to ensure California providers can continue to provide medication abortions without disruption.”
The case reached the Supreme Court of the United States, where it was initially considered to be likely that the Texas judge’s ruling would be upheld. In anticipation of this decision, it was announced that the Governor and legislative leaders would pursue actions to protect the ability of California pharmacists to dispense mifepristone “even if the Supreme Court suspends the drug’s FDA approval,” along with additional safeguards and privacy protections. However, shortly after that announcement, the Court ruled to stay the ruling of the Texas judge, providing temporary assurance that access to mifepristone would remain in place.
The Court once again considered challenges to the FDA’s approval of mifepristone for medication abortion when it heard arguments in Food and Drug Administration, et al., v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine in early 2024. California joined 22 other states in filing an amicus curiae brief on behalf of the FDA’s review process and its longstanding approval of mifepristone. The Court ultimately ruled that the coalition of anti-abortion activists did not have standing, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh writing an opinion that held that the FDA’s approval of mifepristone did not require doctors with religious objections to abortion to prescribe that medication.[8]
While efforts to undermine access to mifepristone have been repeatedly unsuccessful in the courts, anti-choice activists have continued to pursue actions to limit or punish the use of that medication. In late 2024, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued a New York physician for prescribing abortion medication to a Texas resident through telehealth. This litigation invokes a number of legal questions about the ability of states to shield practitioners and patients from draconian laws limiting access to abortion care through laws like those recently enacted in California.
This bill would seek to provide further reassurance that mifepristone will remain available in California and that health care professionals and their patients will be protected even if actions taken by activists, the courts, or the Trump Administration seek to prohibit or restrict medication abortion. The bill would unequivocally state that the authority of a healing arts practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion is the practice of medicine, and the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the ability of a practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion if that action is lawful under the laws of the state, are against the public policy of California. The bill would additionally protect healing arts licensees who prescribe, furnish, order, administer, or dispense mifepristone and related drugs from criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action.
Prescription Drug Container Labeling. Current law prohibits a pharmacist from dispensing a prescription unless they do so with a container that meets certain labeling requirements. Absent a small number of exemptions, every prescription drug container must be labeled with the following information:
- The drug’s trade name, or its generic name and manufacturer;
- Directions for the use of the drug;
- The name of the patient or patients;
- The name of the prescriber or other practitioner operating under a standardized procedure or protocol;
- The date of issue;
- The name and address of the pharmacy and the prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription;
- The strength and quantity of the drug or drugs dispensed;
- The expiration date of the effectiveness of the drug dispensed;
- The condition or purpose for which the drug was prescribed, if indicated;
- A physical description of the dispensed medication, including its color, shape, and any identification code that appears on the tablets or capsules, except in certain cases.
- A notice that states “Caution: Opioid. Risk of overdose and addiction” when the medication is an opioid dispensed to a patient for outpatient use.
In addition, the California Patient Medication Safety Act directed the BOP to promulgate further regulations to require a “standardized, patient-centered, prescription drug label on all prescription medicine dispensed to patients in California.” The resulting language enacted in 16 C.C.R. § 1707.5 specifies that drug container label information must be clustered into one area of the label comprising at least 50 percent of the label, and that each item must be printed in at least a 12-point sans serif typeface. The regulations provide template language and recommend formatting to provide added emphasis.
This bill would allow for a pharmacist to choose to dispense brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the prescriber or the name and address of the pharmacy, as currently required, if the prescription is labeled with a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription. This language is in part connected to the lawsuit brought by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton against the physician in New York, whose prescribing of mifepristone was identified through the discovery of prescription bottles in the patient’s home. Legislation establishing a similar exemption from prescription container labeling requirements was signed into law by New York Governor Kathy Hochul in February 2025. The author believes that similar language is necessary to ensure that California health care practitioners are also fully protected from attempted prosecution.
Current Related Legislation. AB 54 (Krell) would establish the Access to Safe Abortion Care Act, which would prohibit a manufacturer, distributor, authorized health care provider, pharmacist, or individual from being subject to civil or criminal liability, or professional disciplinary action, for accessing, mailing, shipping, receiving, transporting, distributing, dispensing, or administering mifepristone or misoprostol on or after January 1, 2020, in accordance with state law, applicable and accepted standards of care, and good faith compliance with the provisions of the bill. This bill is pending in the Assembly Committee on Judiciary.
Prior Related Legislation. SB 233 (Skinner), Chapter 11, Statutes of 2024 established a temporary registration program to allow for physicians licensed to practice medicine in Arizona to perform abortions or provide abortion-related care in California to patients traveling from Arizona for that care.
SB 385 (Atkins), Chapter 178, Statutes of 2023 expanded the training options for physician assistants seeking to perform abortions by aspiration techniques.
AB 1707 (Pacheco), Chapter 258, Statutes of 2023 prohibited licensed health care professionals, clinics, and health facilities from being denied a license or subjected to discipline on the basis of a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or disciplinary action imposed by another state based solely on the application of a law that interferes with a person's right to receive sensitive services that would be lawful in California.
AB 1369 (Bauer-Kahan), Chapter 837, Statutes of 2023 authorized an out-of-state physician to practice medicine in California without a California license if the practice is limited to delivering health care via telehealth to a patient who has an immediate life-threatening disease or condition.
AB 1666 (Bauer-Kahan), Chapter 42, Statutes of 2022 declared that another state’s law authorizing a civil action against a person or entity that receives or seeks, performs or induces, or aids or abets the performance of an abortion, or who attempts or intends to engage in those actions, is contrary to the public policy of this state.
AB 657 (Cooper), Chapter 560, Statutes of 2022 required specified healing arts boards to expedite the license application for an applicant who demonstrates that they intend to provide abortions.
AB 2626 (Calderon), Chapter 565, Statutes of 2022 prohibited specified licensing boards from suspending, revoking, or denying a license solely for performing an abortion that is lawful in California in accordance with the licensee’s practice act.
AB 1242 (Bauer-Kahan), Chapter 627, Statutes of 2022 prohibited law enforcement and specified corporations from providing information to out-of-state entities regarding a lawful abortion under California law.
AB 2091 (Bonta), Chapter 628, Statutes of 2022 protected the private information of individuals who seek or consider an abortion, including a prohibition against the sharing of reproductive health care information in response to subpoenas related to out-of-state anti-abortion statutes.
SCA 10 (Atkins), Res. Chapter 97, Statutes of 2022 enacted a constitutional amendment to provide that the state shall not deny or interfere with an individual's reproductive freedom in their most intimate decisions, which includes their fundamental right to have an abortion.
AB 1264 (Petrie-Norris), Chapter 741, Statutes of 2019 clarified that an “appropriate prior examination” does not require a synchronous interaction between a provider and a patient for purposes of prescribing, furnishing, or dispensing self-administered hormonal contraceptives.
SB 1301 (Kuehl), Chapter 385, Statutes of 2002 enacted the Reproductive to Privacy Act to prohibit the state’s denial or interference with a woman’s right to choose or obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus, or when necessary to protect the life or health of the woman.
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT:
The co-sponsors of this bill submitted a letter collectively expressing support for the bill, including Attorney General Rob Bonta, Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis, State Treasurer Fiona Ma, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, ACCESS Reproductive Justice, Reproductive Freedom for All, Black Women for Wellness Action Project, TEACH, California Latinas for Reproductive Access, Unite for Reproductive and Gender Equity, Essential Access Health, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Health Law Program, Hey Jane, and the Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine. The coalition letter states: “When access to the fundamental right to health care is under attack across the nation, this bill proactively codifies the existing standard of practice for medication abortion so that it remains legal in California, regardless of federal actions. AB 260 reassures Californians that their rights to essential health care and bodily autonomy are – and will remain – protected. It is for these reasons that we are proud to co-sponsor this legislation.”
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California (PPAC), one of the bill’s co-sponsors, also writes separately in support of the bill: “Medication abortion, and broad access to it, allows individuals to receive safe and effective abortion care in a least invasive manner. Any federal threats to restrict medication abortion and the drugs used are not only dangerous and risky, but also a direct attack on the state’s constitutional right to reproductive freedom. Mifepristone, a drug used in combination with a second drug – misoprostol – to terminate a pregnancy through medication abortion, was approved by the FDA in 2000. Accordingly, scientists have studied the safety of mifepristone for over 25 years, and these decades of evidence show that medication abortion and the drugs used in the process are safe and effective.” PPAC further writes: “AB 260 protects medication abortion by establishing that the current standard of care for the use of mifepristone will remain legal in this state, protecting providers that legally provide mifepristone, requiring the continuation of existing coverage for medication abortion, and expanding access to reproductive health care through telehealth. Proactively taking steps to protect care will help to ensure that there will not be an interruption of access to medication abortion care in California.”
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION:
There is no opposition on file.
REGISTERED SUPPORT:
Attorney General Rob Bonta (Co-Sponsor)
Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis (Co-Sponsor)
State Treasurer Fiona Ma (Co-Sponsor)
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California (Co-Sponsor)
ACCESS Reproductive Justice (Co-Sponsor)
Reproductive Freedom for All (Co-Sponsor)
Black Women for Wellness Action Project (Co-Sponsor)
TEACH (Co-Sponsor)
California Latinas for Reproductive Access (Co-Sponsor)
Unite for Reproductive and Gender Equity (URGE) (Co-Sponsor)
Essential Access Health (Co-Sponsor)
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Co-Sponsor)
National Health Law Program (Co-Sponsor)
Hey Jane (Co-Sponsor)
The Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine (Co-Sponsor)
California Medical Association
California Nurse Midwives Association
California Pan - Ethnic Health Network
California Pharmacists Association
Parent Voices California
REGISTERED OPPOSITION:
1 Individual
Analysis Prepared by: Robert Sumner / B. & P. / (916) 319-3301
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) ↑
Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992) ↑
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U.S. 215 (2022) ↑
https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2021/10/26-states-are-certain-or-likely-ban-abortion-without-roe-heres-which-ones-and-why ↑
https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2022/06/13-states-have-abortion-trigger-bans-heres-what-happens-when-roe-overturned ↑
https://www.guttmacher.org/2023/12/high-toll-us-abortion-bans-nearly-one-five-patients-now-traveling-out-state-abortion-care ↑
“FDA panel finds mifepristone safe and effective.” Reproductive freedom news vol. 5,13 (1996). ↑
FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, 602 U.S. ___ (2024). ↑
Date of Hearing: April 8, 2025
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HEALTH
Mia Bonta, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 260
Author:(Aguiar-Curry) – As Amended Ver:March 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Sexual and reproductive health care.
SUMMARY: Repeals unconstitutional, and deletes obsolete provisions of current law relating to criminal abortion penalties. Authorizes the California Department of Public Health (DPH) to adopt regulations specific to mifepristone and other medication abortion drugs, including exempting those drugs from certain requirements if the drugs are no longer approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Places various requirements on pharmacists related to prescribing and dispensing mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs. Prohibits DPH from taking criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a clinic or health facility for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs. Requires the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to update provider enrollment requirements and procedures for remote service providers who offer reproductive health care services exclusively thorough telehealth modalities. Prohibits a health care service plan contract or a group or individual disability insurance policy that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, regardless of its FDA approval status. Makes various changes to requirements specific to healing arts practitioners who are authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer certain drugs. Specifically, this bill:
Clinic and Health Facility Licensing
- Prohibits, consistent with the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer from commencing a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensed clinic, or a health facility, as defined, concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
- Prohibits DPH from suspending or revoking a license, or otherwise taking disciplinary action against a licensed clinic, or a health facility, solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
- Prohibits DPH from denying an application for licensure, or suspending or revoking a license, or otherwise imposing discipline upon a licensed clinic, or a health facility, solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
- Makes the provisions in 1) through 3) above severable. Specifies that if any of those provisions or their application is held invalid, that invalidity will not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
Health care service plans
- Prohibits the state from issuing, amending, delivering, or renewing a health plan or health insurer contract that covers prescription drug benefits if the contract limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to federal law, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
- Prohibits the state from issuing, amending, delivering, or renewing a health plan or health insurer contract that covers prescription drug benefits if the contract limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, regardless of its FDA approval status, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
- Prohibits a contract issued, amended, or renewed between a health plan or health insurer and a provider of health care services on or after January 1, 2024 from containing any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider based on the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
- Prohibits a health plan or health insurer from discriminating, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
Sherman Food & Drug Act
- Authorizes the Department of Public Health (DPH) to adopt regulations relating to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion by including brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion within, or excluding brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion from, the requirements of the Sherman Food and Drug Act (Sherman Act) whether or not the inclusion or exclusion of the drug is in accordance with federal law.
- Prohibits, notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with the California Constitution, the Sherman Act from applying to brand name or generic mifepristone in the event of a labeling change or in the absence of its FDA approval, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
- Makes the provisions in 9) and 10) above severable. States that if any provision of those provisions or their application is held invalid, that invalidity will not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
- Exempts a brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device from the labeling requirements described 12) of existing law below, if the label complies with the provisions described in 13) of existing law below.
Medi-Cal
- Requires the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to update the Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirement and procedures for remote service providers who offer reproductive health care services exclusively through telehealth modalities seeking enrollment in the Medi-Cal program to report an “administrative location” as their service address. Makes that administrative location exempt from the following established place of business requirements required in regulation:
- Displays regular and permanently posted business hours;
- Is identifiable as a medical or health care provider or business by permanently attached signage that identifies the name of the provider or business as shown on the application; and,
- Obtains and maintains liability insurance coverage, which covers premises and operation, in an amount not less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) per claim with a minimum annual aggregate of not less than three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) from an authorized insurer.
- Requires DHCS to modify requirements set forth in regulations to permit the use of a cellular telephone as the primary business phone for reproductive health care providers.
- Requires a provider subject to 13) and 14) above to meet current Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirements and standards.
- Defines, “reproductive health care services” to mean and include all services, care, or products of a medical, surgical, psychiatric, therapeutic, diagnostic, mental health, behavioral health, preventative, rehabilitative, supportive, consultative, referral, prescribing, or dispensing nature relating to the human reproductive system provided in accordance with the constitution and laws of this state, whether provided in person or by means of telehealth services which includes, but is not limited to, all services, care, and products relating to pregnancy, the termination of a pregnancy, assisted reproduction, or contraception.
- Defines “asynchronous store and forward” to mean the transmission of a patient’s medical information from an originating site to the health care provider at a distant site. Transmission under asynchronous store and forward also includes asynchronous electronic transmission initiated directly by patients, including through mobile telephone applications.
- Authorizes a health care provider to establish a new patient relationship using asynchronous store and forward if the visit is related to sensitive services including reproductive health care services, if those services meet the applicable standard of care, can be appropriately delivered via the telehealth modalities, the patient requests an asynchronous store and forward modality, and, the relationship is established in accordance with DHCS-specific requirements and is consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance.
Removal of Obsolete Code and Clarifying Changes
- Deletes an unconstitutional provision prohibiting a minor from receiving an abortion without the consent of a parent or guardian.
- Repeals an obsolete Penal Code provision prohibiting a defendant on trial for procuring or attempting to procure an abortion, or aiding or assisting therein, or for inveigling, enticing, or taking away an unmarried female of previous chaste character, under the age of eighteen years, for the purpose of prostitution, or aiding or assisting therein, from being convicted upon the testimony of the woman upon, or with whom the offense was committed, unless she is corroborated by other evidence.
- Clarifies that a condition or restriction cannot be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by an incarcerated person pursuant to the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act.
Findings and declarations
- Makes findings and declarations that:
- It is the longstanding public policy of this state to promote access to reproductive health care, including abortion care, without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers, and that every pregnant individual has the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, a right that is secured by the California Constitution;
- Recent federal action and litigation has raised uncertainty about the continued availability nationwide of mifepristone, a drug that has been clinically proven to be part of a safe and effective means of providing medication abortion; and,
- The continued attacks on reproductive freedom across the country require immediate action to protect the right to abortion access, including access to medication abortion, in California.
- It is the longstanding public policy of this state to promote access to reproductive health care, including abortion care, without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers, and that every pregnant individual has the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, a right that is secured by the California Constitution;
The following provisions will be analyzed by the Business and Professions Committee.
- Repeals an unconstitutional provision of law making every person who willfully writes, composes or publishes any notice or advertisement of any medicine or means for producing or facilitating a miscarriage or abortion, or who offers his services by any notice, advertisement, or otherwise, to assist in the accomplishment of any such purpose guilty of a felony.
- Prohibits a healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs from being subject to a civil or criminal action or disciplinary or other administrative proceeding solely on the basis that the practitioner prescribed, furnished, ordered, or administered brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to federal law, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
- States that pursuant to the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act the authority of a healing arts practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion is the practice of medicine, and the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the ability of a practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion if that action is lawful under the laws of the state, are against the public policy of this state.
- Prohibits, notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer from commencing a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against an individual licensed or certified by a healing arts board concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
- Prohibits a healing arts board from suspending a license, revoking a license, or otherwise taking disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
- Prohibits a healing arts board from denying an application for licensure, or suspending a license, revoking a license, or otherwise imposing discipline upon a licensee or health care practitioner subject to the provisions of 26) through 28) above, solely because the licensee or practitioner was convicted or disciplined in another state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
- Makes the provisions in 26) through 30) severable. Prohibits, if any of those provisions or their application is held invalid, that invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
- Deletes an unconstitutional provisions of law allowing various oversight boards to revoke the licenses of a midwife, certified or licensed nurse, and other health care providers for procuring, aiding, abetting, attempting, agreeing to procure, offering to procure, or assisting at, a criminal abortion.
- Authorizes a pharmacist to, notwithstanding any other law, at their discretion, dispense brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the prescriber or the name and address of the pharmacy if the prescription is labeled with a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
- Requires a pharmacist who dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion, as authorized in 33) below, to maintain a log with the prescription numbers and other information, as specified.
- Requires all records maintained pursuant to 32) above to not be open to inspection by law enforcement without a valid, court-issued subpoena.
- Requires a pharmacist to inform the patient that the pharmacist is dispensing brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion.
- Prohibits, notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer from commencing a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
- Prohibits the Board of Pharmacy (BoP) from suspending or revoking a license, or otherwise taking disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
- Prohibits the BoP from denying an application for licensure, or suspending or revoking a license, or otherwise imposing discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
- Makes the provisions above severable. States that if any of those provisions or their application is held invalid, that invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
EXISTING LAW:
- Establishes the Reproductive Privacy Act and provides that the Legislature finds and declares that every individual possesses a fundamental right of privacy with respect to personal reproductive decisions and, therefore, it is the public policy of the State of California that:
- Every individual has the fundamental right to choose or refuse birth control; and
- Every individual has the fundamental right to choose to bear a child or to choose to obtain an abortion, with specified limited exceptions. [Health & Safety Code (HSC) §§ 123460 et seq., 123462 (a)-(b).]
- Prohibits the state from denying or interfering with a person’s right to choose or obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the person. [HSC §§ 123462 (c), 123466]
- Licenses and regulates clinics, including primary care clinics and specialty clinics, by DPH. Defines a primary care clinic as either a “community clinic,” which is required to be operated by a non-profit corporation and to use a sliding fee scale to charge patients based on their ability to pay, or a “free clinic,” which is also required to be operated by a non-profit but is not allowed to directly charge patients for services rendered or for any drugs, medicines, or apparatuses furnished [HSC §§ 1200, 1204]
- Defines “health facility” to mean a facility, place, or building that is organized, maintained, and operated for the diagnosis, care, prevention, and treatment of human illness, physical or mental, including convalescence and rehabilitation and including care during and after pregnancy, or for any one or more of these purposes, for one or more persons, to which the persons are admitted for a 24-hour stay or longer, and includes the following types, among others:
- General Acute Care Hospitals (GACHs), which means a health facility having a duly constituted governing body with overall administrative and professional responsibility and an organized medical staff that provides 24-hour inpatient care, including the following basic services: medical, nursing, surgical, anesthesia, laboratory, radiology, pharmacy, and dietary services;
- Acute psychiatric hospital, which means a health facility having a duly constituted governing body with overall administrative and professional responsibility and an organized medical staff that provides 24-hour inpatient care for persons with mental health disorders;
- Skilled nursing facility (SNF), which means a health facility that provides skilled nursing care and supportive care to patients whose primary need is for availability of skilled nursing care on an extended basis;
- Intermediate care facility (ICF), which means a health facility that provides inpatient care to ambulatory or non-ambulatory patients who have recurring need for skilled nursing supervision and need supportive care, but who do not require availability of continuous skilled nursing care;
- Special hospital, which means a health facility having a duly constituted governing body with overall administrative and professional responsibility and an organized medical or dental staff that provides inpatient or outpatient care in dentistry or maternity (there are currently no licensed special hospitals in California);
- Congregate living health facility, which means a residential home with a capacity of no more than 18 beds, that provides inpatient care, including the following basic services: medical supervision, 24-hour skilled nursing and supportive care, pharmacy, dietary, social, and recreational;
- Correctional treatment center, which means a health facility operated by the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (DCR), the DCR Division of Juvenile Facilities, or a county, city, or city and county law enforcement agency that, as determined by DCR, provides inpatient health services to that portion of the inmate population who do not require a general acute care level of basic services;
- Nursing facility, which means a health facility that is certified to participate as a provider of care either as a SNF in the federal Medicare Program or Medicaid Program, or both; and,
- Hospice facilities. [HSC § 1250 et seq.]
- Establishes the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) to regulate health plans under the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 and the California Department of Insurance (CDI) to regulate health insurers. [HSC § 1340, et seq., and Insurance Code (INS) § 106, et seq.]
- Establishes California's essential health benefits (EHBs) benchmark under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) as the Kaiser Small Group Health Maintenance Organization, establishes existing California health insurance mandates, and the ten ACA mandated benefits, including prescription drug coverage. [HSC § 1367.005 and INS § 10112.27]
- Prohibits the state from issuing, amending, delivering, or renewing a health plan or insurer contract that covers prescription drug benefits if the contract limits or excludes coverage for a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA, under specified conditions. [HSC § 1367.21 and INS § 10123.195 ]
- Prohibits a contract issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2024, between a health plan or health insurer and a provider of health care services, from containing any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, based solely on a civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another disciplinary action in another state, if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another state’s law that interferes with a person’s right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California. [HSC § 1375.61 and INS § 10133.641]
- Prohibits a health plan or insurer from discriminating, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of a civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another state’s law that interferes with a person’s right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California. [HSC § 1375.61 and INS § 10133.641]
- Prohibits, with respect to an individual or group health plan contract or health insurance policy that covers EHBs, the copayment, coinsurance, or any other form of cost sharing for a covered outpatient prescription drug for an individual prescription for a supply of up to 30 days from exceeding $250; for a product with an actuarial value at or equivalent to a Bronze level, limits cost sharing to not more than $500 for a supply of up to 30 days; and for a high deductible health plan the $250 or $500 limits apply only after an enrollee’s deductible is met. [HSC § 1342.73 and INS § 10123.1932]
- Establishes the Sherman Food, Drug and Cosmetics Law, administered by DPH, which regulates the packaging, labeling, and advertising of drugs and devices, including dietary supplements. [HSC § 109875-111929.4]
- Exempts a drug or device sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device from specified labeling requirements if the drug or device bears a label displaying all of the following:
- The manufacturers trade name of the drug, or the generic name and the name of the manufacturer;
- The directions for the use of the drug or device;
- The name of the patient(s);
- The name of the prescriber;
- The date of issue;
- The name, address of the furnisher, and prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription;
- The strength of the drug or drugs dispensed;
- The quantity of the drug or drugs dispensed; and,
- The expiration date of the effectiveness of the drug or device if the information is included on the original label of the manufacturer of the drug or device. [Business and Professions Code (BPC) § 111480]
- Authorizes, notwithstanding any other law, a pharmacist to dispense a drug prescribed for a sexually transmitted disease and label the drug without the name of an individual for whom the drug is intended if the prescription includes the words “expedited partner therapy” or the letters “EPT.” [HSC § 120582, BPC § 4076 (g)]
- Prohibits a pharmacist who prescribes, dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders EPT, as authorized in 13) above, from being liable in, or being subject to, a civil, criminal, or administrative action, sanction, or penalty for rendering EPT, except in cases of intentional misconduct, gross negligence, or wanton or reckless activity. [BPC § 4076(g)]
- Requires a pharmacist who provides EPT under the provisions of 13) above to provide written notification that describes the right of an individual who receives EPT to consult with a pharmacist about the medication dispensed and additional information regarding possible drug interactions. [Ibid.]
- Establishes the Medi-Cal Program, administered by DHCS, to provide comprehensive health benefits to low-income individuals who meet specified eligibility criteria. [Welfare and Institutions Code (WIC) § 14000 et seq.]
- Establishes requirements, processes, and timelines for the enrollment of providers in the Medi-Cal program. Requires, with limited exceptions, a provider not currently enrolled in the Medi-Cal program, a provider applying for continued enrollment, or a provider not currently enrolled at a location where the provider intends to provide goods or services to a Medi-Cal beneficiary, to submit a complete application package for enrollment, continuing enrollment, or enrollment at a new location or a change in location. [WIC § 14043.26]
- Requires applicants or providers to have an established place of business appropriate and adequate for the services billed or claimed to the Medi-Cal program as relevant to their scope of practice or type of business. [California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22, § 51000.60]
- Defines “telehealth” to:
- Mean the mode of delivering health care services and public health via information and communication technologies to facilitate the diagnosis, consultation, treatment, education, care management, and self-management of a patient’s health care; and,
- Include synchronous interactions and asynchronous store and forward transfers. [BPC § 2290.5 (a)(6)]
- Establishes a schedule of benefits under the Medi-Cal program. [WIC § 14132]
- Establishes Medi-Cal coverage for health care services provided through telehealth, including specifying that in-person, face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient is not required under the Medi-Cal program for covered health care services and provider types designated by DHCS, when those services and settings meet the applicable standard of care and meet the requirements of the service code being billed. [WIC § 14132.725 and § 14132.100]
- Prohibits a health care provider from establishing a new patient relationship with a Medi-Cal beneficiary via telehealth modalities other than video, except as follows:
- When exceptions are developed by DHCS in consultation with affected stakeholders and published in DHCS guidance.
- When a visit is conducted through an audio-only synchronous interaction and is otherwise consistent with DHCS guidance, and either one of the following is true:
- The visit is related to sensitive services; or,
- A patient requests an audio-only modality or attests they do not have access to video. [WIC § 14132.725]
- Defines “sensitive services” to include health care services related to mental or behavioral health, pregnancy, sexual and reproductive health, sexually transmitted infections, substance use disorder, gender affirming care, and intimate partner violence, and also includes health care services minors may independently consent to receive [Civil Code § 56.05]
- Authorizes a minor to consent to medical care related to the prevention or treatment of pregnancy. [Family Code § 6925]
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown. This bill has not yet been analyzed by a fiscal committee.
COMMENTS:
- PURPOSE OF THIS BILL. According to the author, for years, California has promoted access to reproductive health care without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers. However, recent lawsuits and actions by the federal government are exploring ways to limit states’ ability to provide medication abortion drugs, posing a threat to Californians’ constitutional right to reproductive freedom. This bill enhances access to medication abortion in California by protecting health care providers, facilities, and patients who access abortion medication, while also expanding overall access to reproductive health care. The author states that this bill ensures that the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, secured by the California Constitution, remains protected. The author concludes that when access to the fundamental right to health care is under attack across the nation, this bill proactively seeks to ensure that the existing standard of practice for medication abortion remains legal in California.
- BACKGROUND. Every pregnant individual in California has the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, a right guaranteed the California Constitution and supported by other state laws protecting access to sexual and reproductive health care in the state. However, at the federal level, there is uncertainty about the continued access of abortion care, specifically as it relates to mifepristone, a drug used for medication abortion. Since taking office, the Trump Administration has taken action to restrict access to reproductive and sexual health care and vocalized that additional steps are imminent, rolling back existing protections and advancements, access, and equity achieved for patients, providers, and health facilities.
In the first week of the Administration, President Trump signed an Executive Order directing agencies to review programs and calling for more stringent enforcement of the Hyde Amendment. Notably, the order indicates an intent to expand the reach of the Hyde Amendment, by further restricting not just the funding but also the “promotion” of abortion access, even in states like California. Additionally, despite years of research, the U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. further stated during his confirmation hearing that “President Trump has asked me to study the safety of mifepristone.” Similarly, the nominee for U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA) administrator, Martin Makary, also made no commitment to maintain current mifepristone policies in his confirmation hearing.
- Mifepristone. Medication abortion allows individuals to receive safe and effective abortion care in a less invasive manner. Over two-thirds of all abortions in the U.S. are medication abortions. Mifepristone, a drug used in combination with a second drug – misoprostol – was approved by the FDA in 2000 to terminate a pregnancy. Decades of evidence show that medication abortion and the drugs used in the process are safe and effective.
According to a March 2024 American Medical Association brief, “Reducing access to mifepristone would harm patients,” access to mifepristone significantly improves benefits for vulnerable communities, particularly those in rural areas, people of color, and low-income individuals, by expanding access to life-saving reproductive care. Mifepristone, when used with misoprostol, allows individuals to terminate pregnancies safely at home, which is especially crucial for those who live in maternity care deserts or face hardships traveling long distances for medical procedures.
- Disparities in access to care. For women of color, low-income women, and rural residents, the dangers of pregnancy in the U.S. are exacerbated, as they are more likely to experience severe maternal morbidity or even pregnancy-related deaths. Additionally, these populations are disproportionately affected by restrictions on abortion care. Studies show that people of color make up the majority of abortion patients, with 75% living at or below 200% of the federal poverty level. Moreover, pregnant individuals of color are more likely to face early pregnancy loss or miscarriage, conditions for which mifepristone is used in treatment. The ability to access abortion care via telehealth, which has been a lifeline for many in these communities, further underscores how mifepristone can be a critical tool in improving access to essential reproductive care, ensuring that vulnerable populations are not left behind in their healthcare needs.
- California Abortion Coverage. California law prohibits the state from denying or interfering with a person’s right to choose or obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus, or when medically necessary. The state defines viability as the point in a pregnancy when, in the good faith medical judgment of a physician, there is a reasonable likelihood that a fetus will survive outside the uterus without "extraordinary medical measures." Abortion is considered a basic health care service in California and, therefore, is required to be covered by commercial health insurance plans and policies. Medically necessary follow-up services to abortions that constitute basic health care services must also be covered. Similarly, Medi-Cal covers abortion and related services comprehensively as a state-funded benefit.
- Shield laws. Since the overturn of Roe v. Wade, eight states (California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington) have passed shield laws, which say that the state government will not comply with civil or criminal prosecutions targeting health care providers who perform abortions from their home states, including mailing medication to patients in places where the procedure is outlawed. Recently a doctor in New York was sued for mailing medication abortion to patients in Louisiana and Texas, two states in which abortion is heavily restricted. This bill seeks to mitigate the harm that could be caused if states can sue a doctor for dispensing or prescribing mifepristone by allowing pharmacists to keep certain information off of the prescription label. This policy has already been signed into law in New York.
- Telehealth. Telehealth is a mode of delivering health care services remotely using information technology. The three primary modalities are video, audio (including telephone), and asynchronous store and forward, which can be used when a real-time interaction is not needed. According to DHCS, from the beneficiary perspective, telehealth can improve access to care and enhance satisfaction by making care more convenient and reducing some of the logistical burdens of seeking in-person care.
- Medi-Cal Telehealth Policy. Medi-Cal allows most clinically appropriate services to be provided through telehealth. According to DHCS, California has been a leading state in the expansiveness of its coverage and reimbursement for services delivered via telehealth. DHCS has committed to continuing to enable broad telehealth coverage for all Medi-Cal covered benefits and services, as long as the provider is able to meet the standard of care, subject to billing, reimbursement, and utilization management policies developed by DHCS. In addition, DHCS notes Medi-Cal is unique among other state Medicaid programs in that the state reimburses audio-only visits at parity with in-person visits.
According to DHCS policy, a health care provider may bill Medi-Cal for a visit with a new patient that is conducted via video. Pursuant to AB 32 (Aguiar-Curry), Chapter 515, Statutes of 2022, Medi-Cal also allows a provider to bill for a visit with a new patient that is conducted via audio-only telehealth (e.g., phone or other audio device), but only under certain circumstances. These circumstances include when the visit is related to “sensitive services,” including behavioral health and reproductive health services, or when the patient requests an audio-only modality or attests they do not have access to video. Additional exceptions may be made by DHCS in consultation with stakeholders. This bill would apply similar reimbursement rules to the establishment of new patients through asynchronous store and forward telehealth.
- How AB 260 Changes Medi-Cal Telehealth Policy. This bill would essentially make such an exception to current policy that restricts the establishment of new patients via telehealth, expanding the circumstances under which a health care provider may bill for an asynchronous encounter with a new patient. Specifically:
- This bill would allow asynchronous store and forward to be used for new patient visits when a visit is related to “sensitive services” or when a patient requests one. The author and sponsor explain this exception is needed to reduce barriers to care for patients who may not have an existing relationship with a provider and who may struggle to arrange an audio or video visit. For instance, patients commonly reach out to a provider outside of their normal source of care for birth control, emergency contraception, and urinary tract infection treatment.
- This bill also includes, in the definition of asynchronous store and forward, electronic transmission initiated directly by patients, including through mobile telephone applications (“apps”). According to the bill’s sponsors, this is important to allow for Medi-Cal patients to be able to access asynchronous services from Medi-Cal providers through apps, often the same apps used for synchronous telehealth services.
- How AB 260 Changes Medi-Cal Telehealth Policy. This bill would essentially make such an exception to current policy that restricts the establishment of new patients via telehealth, expanding the circumstances under which a health care provider may bill for an asynchronous encounter with a new patient. Specifically:
- SUPPORT. Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California (PPAC) is the sponsor of this bill and states that medication abortion, and broad access to it, allows individuals to receive safe and effective abortion care in a least-invasive manner. Any federal threats to restrict medication abortion and the drugs used are not only dangerous and risky, but also a direct attack on the state’s constitutional right to reproductive freedom. PPAC notes that mifepristone, a drug used in combination with a second drug – misoprostol – to terminate a pregnancy through medication abortion, was approved by the FDA in 2000. Accordingly, scientists have studied the safety of mifepristone for over 25 years, and these decades of evidence show that medication abortion and the drugs used in the process are safe and effective.
PPAC points to the fact that President Trump’s appointees to lead the Health and Human Services Agency and the FDA have both made comments in their confirmation hearings about reevaluating mifepristone policies and its safety. With these vocalized, ongoing threats to eliminate legal protections and reduce access to medication abortion at the federal level, California must continue to lead in defending and safeguarding access to safe and accessible abortion care.
PPAC argues that this bill protects medication abortion by establishing that the current standard of care for the use of mifepristone will remain legal in this state, protecting providers that legally provide mifepristone, requiring the continuation of existing coverage for medication abortion, and expanding access to reproductive health care through telehealth. Proactively taking steps to protect care will help to ensure that there will not be an interruption of access to medication abortion care in California. PPAC concludes that when access to the fundamental right to health care is under attack across the nation, this bill proactively codifies that the existing standard of practice for medication abortion so that it remains legal in California, regardless of federal actions.
- RELATED LEGISLATION.
- AB 40 (Bonta) would clarify in current law that “emergency services and care” includes abortion and other reproductive health services, as necessary to relieve or eliminate an emergency medical condition. Contains an urgency clause to ensure that the provisions of this bill go into immediate effect upon enactment. AB 40 was heard in the Assembly Health Committee on April 1, 2025, and passed with a vote of 12-0.
- AB 50 (Bonta) would authorize a pharmacist to furnish over-the-counter contraceptives without having to comply with the standardized procedures or protocols that are required for prescription-only hormonal contraceptives. AB 50 is pending in the Assembly Health Committee.
- AB 54 (Krell) would reaffirm that it has been, and would continue to be, lawful to cause the delivery of, or mail, ship, take, receive, or otherwise transport, any drug, medicine, or instrument that can be designed or adapted to produce an abortion that is lawful in the State of California. Sets forth provisions regarding the lack of civil or criminal liability, or professional disciplinary action, for accessing or administering mifepristone or misoprostol, among other certain conduct, on or after January 1, 2020, with this bill applied retroactively, as specified. AB 54 is pending in the Assembly Health Committee.
- AB 67 (Bauer-Kahan) would impose a civil penalty not exceeding $25,000 upon any person or governmental entity that violates any provision of the Reproductive Privacy Act and a civil penalty for violation of the bill’s provisions. The bill would require any costs, fees, and civil penalties collected pursuant to these provisions to be available to the office of the Attorney General upon appropriation of the Legislature for exclusive use by the Attorney General for enforcement of act. AB 67 is pending in the Assembly Judiciary Committee.
- PREVIOUS LEGISLATION.
- AB 1918 (Petrie-Norris), Chapter 561, Statutes of 2022, establishes the California Reproductive Health Service Corps program within HCAI to reduce the debt burden of current and future health care professionals dedicated to providing reproductive health care in underserved areas of California.
- AB 2091 (Mia Bonta), Chapter 628, Statutes of 2022, prohibits compelling a person to identify or provide information that would identify an individual who has sought or obtained an abortion in a state, county, city, or other local criminal, administrative, legislative, or other proceeding.
- AB 2134 (Akilah Weber), Chapter 562, Statutes of 2022, establishes the California Reproductive Health Equity Program within HCAI to ensure abortion and contraception services are affordable for and accessible to all patients and to provide financial support for safety net providers of these services.
- AB 2223 (Wicks), Chapter 629, Statutes of 2022, prohibits a person from being subject to civil or criminal liability, or otherwise deprived of their rights, based on their actions or omissions with respect to their pregnancy or actual, potential, or alleged pregnancy outcome or based solely on their actions to aid or assist a pregnant person who is exercising their reproductive rights.
- SCA 10 (Atkins) Chapter 97, Statutes of 2022, enacts a constitutional amendment, expressly providing that the state shall not deny or interfere with an individual's reproductive freedom in their most intimate decisions, which includes their fundamental right to choose to have an abortion and their fundamental right to choose or refuse contraceptives.
- SB 1301 (Sheila Kuehl), Chapter 385, Statutes of 2002, enacts the Reproductive Privacy Act, which provides that every individual possesses a fundamental right of privacy with respect to reproductive decisions, including the fundamental right to choose or refuse birth control, and the fundamental right to choose to bear a child or obtain an abortion.
- DOUBLE REFERRAL. This bill is double-referred, upon passage of this committee, it will be referred to the Assembly Committee on Business & Professions.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California (sponsor)
Essential Access Health (cosponsor)
National Health Law Program (cosponsor)
Access Reproductive Justice (cosponsor)
California Latinas for Reproductive Justice (cosponsor)
Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis (cosponsor)
URGE (cosponsor)
Attorney General Rob Bonta
Black Women for Wellness Action Project
Reproductive Freedom for All CA
Teach
Opposition
None on file
Analysis Prepared by: Lara Flynn, Eliza Brooks, Riana King, and Lisa Murawski / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097
Date of Hearing: April 8, 2025
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HEALTH
Mia Bonta, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 260
Author:(Aguiar-Curry) – As Amended Ver:March 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Sexual and reproductive health care.
SUMMARY: Repeals unconstitutional, and deletes obsolete provisions of current law relating to criminal abortion penalties. Authorizes the California Department of Public Health (DPH) to adopt regulations specific to mifepristone and other medication abortion drugs, including exempting those drugs from certain requirements if the drugs are no longer approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Places various requirements on pharmacists related to prescribing and dispensing mifepristone or other medical abortion drugs. Prohibits DPH from taking criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a clinic or health facility for manufacturing, transporting, or engaging in certain acts relating to mifepristone or other medication abortion drugs. Requires the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to update provider enrollment requirements and procedures for remote service providers who offer reproductive health care services exclusively thorough telehealth modalities. Prohibits a health care service plan contract or a group or individual disability insurance policy that covers prescription drugs from limiting or excluding coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, regardless of its FDA approval status. Makes various changes to requirements specific to healing arts practitioners who are authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer certain drugs. Specifically, this bill:
Clinic and Health Facility Licensing
- Prohibits, consistent with the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer from commencing a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against a licensed clinic, or a health facility, as defined, concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
- Prohibits DPH from suspending or revoking a license, or otherwise taking disciplinary action against a licensed clinic, or a health facility, solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
- Prohibits DPH from denying an application for licensure, or suspending or revoking a license, or otherwise imposing discipline upon a licensed clinic, or a health facility, solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
- Makes the provisions in 1) through 3) above severable. Specifies that if any of those provisions or their application is held invalid, that invalidity will not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
Health care service plans
- Prohibits the state from issuing, amending, delivering, or renewing a health plan or health insurer contract that covers prescription drug benefits if the contract limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone solely on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to federal law, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
- Prohibits the state from issuing, amending, delivering, or renewing a health plan or health insurer contract that covers prescription drug benefits if the contract limits or excludes coverage for brand name or generic mifepristone, regardless of its FDA approval status, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
- Prohibits a contract issued, amended, or renewed between a health plan or health insurer and a provider of health care services on or after January 1, 2024 from containing any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider based on the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
- Prohibits a health plan or health insurer from discriminating, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
Sherman Food & Drug Act
- Authorizes the Department of Public Health (DPH) to adopt regulations relating to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion by including brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion within, or excluding brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion from, the requirements of the Sherman Food and Drug Act (Sherman Act) whether or not the inclusion or exclusion of the drug is in accordance with federal law.
- Prohibits, notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with the California Constitution, the Sherman Act from applying to brand name or generic mifepristone in the event of a labeling change or in the absence of its FDA approval, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
- Makes the provisions in 9) and 10) above severable. States that if any provision of those provisions or their application is held invalid, that invalidity will not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
- Exempts a brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device from the labeling requirements described 12) of existing law below, if the label complies with the provisions described in 13) of existing law below.
Medi-Cal
- Requires the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to update the Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirement and procedures for remote service providers who offer reproductive health care services exclusively through telehealth modalities seeking enrollment in the Medi-Cal program to report an “administrative location” as their service address. Makes that administrative location exempt from the following established place of business requirements required in regulation:
- Displays regular and permanently posted business hours;
- Is identifiable as a medical or health care provider or business by permanently attached signage that identifies the name of the provider or business as shown on the application; and,
- Obtains and maintains liability insurance coverage, which covers premises and operation, in an amount not less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) per claim with a minimum annual aggregate of not less than three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) from an authorized insurer.
- Requires DHCS to modify requirements set forth in regulations to permit the use of a cellular telephone as the primary business phone for reproductive health care providers.
- Requires a provider subject to 13) and 14) above to meet current Medi-Cal provider enrollment requirements and standards.
- Defines, “reproductive health care services” to mean and include all services, care, or products of a medical, surgical, psychiatric, therapeutic, diagnostic, mental health, behavioral health, preventative, rehabilitative, supportive, consultative, referral, prescribing, or dispensing nature relating to the human reproductive system provided in accordance with the constitution and laws of this state, whether provided in person or by means of telehealth services which includes, but is not limited to, all services, care, and products relating to pregnancy, the termination of a pregnancy, assisted reproduction, or contraception.
- Defines “asynchronous store and forward” to mean the transmission of a patient’s medical information from an originating site to the health care provider at a distant site. Transmission under asynchronous store and forward also includes asynchronous electronic transmission initiated directly by patients, including through mobile telephone applications.
- Authorizes a health care provider to establish a new patient relationship using asynchronous store and forward if the visit is related to sensitive services including reproductive health care services, if those services meet the applicable standard of care, can be appropriately delivered via the telehealth modalities, the patient requests an asynchronous store and forward modality, and, the relationship is established in accordance with DHCS-specific requirements and is consistent with federal and state laws, regulations, and guidance.
Removal of Obsolete Code and Clarifying Changes
- Deletes an unconstitutional provision prohibiting a minor from receiving an abortion without the consent of a parent or guardian.
- Repeals an obsolete Penal Code provision prohibiting a defendant on trial for procuring or attempting to procure an abortion, or aiding or assisting therein, or for inveigling, enticing, or taking away an unmarried female of previous chaste character, under the age of eighteen years, for the purpose of prostitution, or aiding or assisting therein, from being convicted upon the testimony of the woman upon, or with whom the offense was committed, unless she is corroborated by other evidence.
- Clarifies that a condition or restriction cannot be imposed upon the obtaining of an abortion by an incarcerated person pursuant to the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act.
Findings and declarations
- Makes findings and declarations that:
- It is the longstanding public policy of this state to promote access to reproductive health care, including abortion care, without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers, and that every pregnant individual has the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, a right that is secured by the California Constitution;
- Recent federal action and litigation has raised uncertainty about the continued availability nationwide of mifepristone, a drug that has been clinically proven to be part of a safe and effective means of providing medication abortion; and,
- The continued attacks on reproductive freedom across the country require immediate action to protect the right to abortion access, including access to medication abortion, in California.
- It is the longstanding public policy of this state to promote access to reproductive health care, including abortion care, without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers, and that every pregnant individual has the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, a right that is secured by the California Constitution;
The following provisions will be analyzed by the Business and Professions Committee.
- Repeals an unconstitutional provision of law making every person who willfully writes, composes or publishes any notice or advertisement of any medicine or means for producing or facilitating a miscarriage or abortion, or who offers his services by any notice, advertisement, or otherwise, to assist in the accomplishment of any such purpose guilty of a felony.
- Prohibits a healing arts practitioner who is authorized to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer dangerous drugs from being subject to a civil or criminal action or disciplinary or other administrative proceeding solely on the basis that the practitioner prescribed, furnished, ordered, or administered brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA or that varies from an approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategy pursuant to federal law, except if the state deems it necessary to address an imminent health or safety concern regarding brand name or generic mifepristone.
- States that pursuant to the California Constitution and the Reproductive Privacy Act the authority of a healing arts practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion is the practice of medicine, and the laws of another state or federal actions that interfere with the ability of a practitioner to prescribe, furnish, order, or administer brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion if that action is lawful under the laws of the state, are against the public policy of this state.
- Prohibits, notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer from commencing a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action against an individual licensed or certified by a healing arts board concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
- Prohibits a healing arts board from suspending a license, revoking a license, or otherwise taking disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
- Prohibits a healing arts board from denying an application for licensure, or suspending a license, revoking a license, or otherwise imposing discipline upon a licensee or health care practitioner subject to the provisions of 26) through 28) above, solely because the licensee or practitioner was convicted or disciplined in another state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
- Makes the provisions in 26) through 30) severable. Prohibits, if any of those provisions or their application is held invalid, that invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
- Deletes an unconstitutional provisions of law allowing various oversight boards to revoke the licenses of a midwife, certified or licensed nurse, and other health care providers for procuring, aiding, abetting, attempting, agreeing to procure, offering to procure, or assisting at, a criminal abortion.
- Authorizes a pharmacist to, notwithstanding any other law, at their discretion, dispense brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion without the name of the prescriber or the name and address of the pharmacy if the prescription is labeled with a prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription.
- Requires a pharmacist who dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion, as authorized in 33) below, to maintain a log with the prescription numbers and other information, as specified.
- Requires all records maintained pursuant to 32) above to not be open to inspection by law enforcement without a valid, court-issued subpoena.
- Requires a pharmacist to inform the patient that the pharmacist is dispensing brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion.
- Prohibits, notwithstanding any other state law, and consistent with the California Constitution, an individual or state or local officer from commencing a criminal, civil, professional discipline, or licensing action concerning the manufacture, transport, distribution, delivery, receipt, acquisition, sale, possession, furnishment, dispensation, repackaging, or storage of brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
- Prohibits the Board of Pharmacy (BoP) from suspending or revoking a license, or otherwise taking disciplinary action against a licensee solely on the basis that the licensee manufactured, transported, distributed, delivered, received, acquired, sold, possessed, furnished, dispensed, repackaged, or stored brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that is lawful under the laws of the state.
- Prohibits the BoP from denying an application for licensure, or suspending or revoking a license, or otherwise imposing discipline upon a licensee solely because the licensee is licensed in another state and was convicted or disciplined in that state solely for an activity related to brand name or generic mifepristone or any drug used for medication abortion that, if performed in this state, would not be grounds for denial, suspension, revocation, or other discipline.
- Makes the provisions above severable. States that if any of those provisions or their application is held invalid, that invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
EXISTING LAW:
- Establishes the Reproductive Privacy Act and provides that the Legislature finds and declares that every individual possesses a fundamental right of privacy with respect to personal reproductive decisions and, therefore, it is the public policy of the State of California that:
- Every individual has the fundamental right to choose or refuse birth control; and
- Every individual has the fundamental right to choose to bear a child or to choose to obtain an abortion, with specified limited exceptions. [Health & Safety Code (HSC) §§ 123460 et seq., 123462 (a)-(b).]
- Prohibits the state from denying or interfering with a person’s right to choose or obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the person. [HSC §§ 123462 (c), 123466]
- Licenses and regulates clinics, including primary care clinics and specialty clinics, by DPH. Defines a primary care clinic as either a “community clinic,” which is required to be operated by a non-profit corporation and to use a sliding fee scale to charge patients based on their ability to pay, or a “free clinic,” which is also required to be operated by a non-profit but is not allowed to directly charge patients for services rendered or for any drugs, medicines, or apparatuses furnished [HSC §§ 1200, 1204]
- Defines “health facility” to mean a facility, place, or building that is organized, maintained, and operated for the diagnosis, care, prevention, and treatment of human illness, physical or mental, including convalescence and rehabilitation and including care during and after pregnancy, or for any one or more of these purposes, for one or more persons, to which the persons are admitted for a 24-hour stay or longer, and includes the following types, among others:
- General Acute Care Hospitals (GACHs), which means a health facility having a duly constituted governing body with overall administrative and professional responsibility and an organized medical staff that provides 24-hour inpatient care, including the following basic services: medical, nursing, surgical, anesthesia, laboratory, radiology, pharmacy, and dietary services;
- Acute psychiatric hospital, which means a health facility having a duly constituted governing body with overall administrative and professional responsibility and an organized medical staff that provides 24-hour inpatient care for persons with mental health disorders;
- Skilled nursing facility (SNF), which means a health facility that provides skilled nursing care and supportive care to patients whose primary need is for availability of skilled nursing care on an extended basis;
- Intermediate care facility (ICF), which means a health facility that provides inpatient care to ambulatory or non-ambulatory patients who have recurring need for skilled nursing supervision and need supportive care, but who do not require availability of continuous skilled nursing care;
- Special hospital, which means a health facility having a duly constituted governing body with overall administrative and professional responsibility and an organized medical or dental staff that provides inpatient or outpatient care in dentistry or maternity (there are currently no licensed special hospitals in California);
- Congregate living health facility, which means a residential home with a capacity of no more than 18 beds, that provides inpatient care, including the following basic services: medical supervision, 24-hour skilled nursing and supportive care, pharmacy, dietary, social, and recreational;
- Correctional treatment center, which means a health facility operated by the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (DCR), the DCR Division of Juvenile Facilities, or a county, city, or city and county law enforcement agency that, as determined by DCR, provides inpatient health services to that portion of the inmate population who do not require a general acute care level of basic services;
- Nursing facility, which means a health facility that is certified to participate as a provider of care either as a SNF in the federal Medicare Program or Medicaid Program, or both; and,
- Hospice facilities. [HSC § 1250 et seq.]
- Establishes the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) to regulate health plans under the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 and the California Department of Insurance (CDI) to regulate health insurers. [HSC § 1340, et seq., and Insurance Code (INS) § 106, et seq.]
- Establishes California's essential health benefits (EHBs) benchmark under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) as the Kaiser Small Group Health Maintenance Organization, establishes existing California health insurance mandates, and the ten ACA mandated benefits, including prescription drug coverage. [HSC § 1367.005 and INS § 10112.27]
- Prohibits the state from issuing, amending, delivering, or renewing a health plan or insurer contract that covers prescription drug benefits if the contract limits or excludes coverage for a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the FDA, under specified conditions. [HSC § 1367.21 and INS § 10123.195 ]
- Prohibits a contract issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2024, between a health plan or health insurer and a provider of health care services, from containing any term that would result in termination or nonrenewal of the contract or otherwise penalize the provider, based solely on a civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another disciplinary action in another state, if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another state’s law that interferes with a person’s right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California. [HSC § 1375.61 and INS § 10133.641]
- Prohibits a health plan or insurer from discriminating, with respect to the provision of, or contracts for, professional services, against a licensed provider solely on the basis of a civil judgment issued in another state, a criminal conviction in another state, or another disciplinary action in another state if the judgment, conviction, or disciplinary action is based solely on the application of another state’s law that interferes with a person’s right to receive care that would be lawful if provided in California. [HSC § 1375.61 and INS § 10133.641]
- Prohibits, with respect to an individual or group health plan contract or health insurance policy that covers EHBs, the copayment, coinsurance, or any other form of cost sharing for a covered outpatient prescription drug for an individual prescription for a supply of up to 30 days from exceeding $250; for a product with an actuarial value at or equivalent to a Bronze level, limits cost sharing to not more than $500 for a supply of up to 30 days; and for a high deductible health plan the $250 or $500 limits apply only after an enrollee’s deductible is met. [HSC § 1342.73 and INS § 10123.1932]
- Establishes the Sherman Food, Drug and Cosmetics Law, administered by DPH, which regulates the packaging, labeling, and advertising of drugs and devices, including dietary supplements. [HSC § 109875-111929.4]
- Exempts a drug or device sold by filling or refilling a written or oral prescription of a practitioner licensed to prescribe the drug or device from specified labeling requirements if the drug or device bears a label displaying all of the following:
- The manufacturers trade name of the drug, or the generic name and the name of the manufacturer;
- The directions for the use of the drug or device;
- The name of the patient(s);
- The name of the prescriber;
- The date of issue;
- The name, address of the furnisher, and prescription number or other means of identifying the prescription;
- The strength of the drug or drugs dispensed;
- The quantity of the drug or drugs dispensed; and,
- The expiration date of the effectiveness of the drug or device if the information is included on the original label of the manufacturer of the drug or device. [Business and Professions Code (BPC) § 111480]
- Authorizes, notwithstanding any other law, a pharmacist to dispense a drug prescribed for a sexually transmitted disease and label the drug without the name of an individual for whom the drug is intended if the prescription includes the words “expedited partner therapy” or the letters “EPT.” [HSC § 120582, BPC § 4076 (g)]
- Prohibits a pharmacist who prescribes, dispenses, furnishes, or otherwise renders EPT, as authorized in 13) above, from being liable in, or being subject to, a civil, criminal, or administrative action, sanction, or penalty for rendering EPT, except in cases of intentional misconduct, gross negligence, or wanton or reckless activity. [BPC § 4076(g)]
- Requires a pharmacist who provides EPT under the provisions of 13) above to provide written notification that describes the right of an individual who receives EPT to consult with a pharmacist about the medication dispensed and additional information regarding possible drug interactions. [Ibid.]
- Establishes the Medi-Cal Program, administered by DHCS, to provide comprehensive health benefits to low-income individuals who meet specified eligibility criteria. [Welfare and Institutions Code (WIC) § 14000 et seq.]
- Establishes requirements, processes, and timelines for the enrollment of providers in the Medi-Cal program. Requires, with limited exceptions, a provider not currently enrolled in the Medi-Cal program, a provider applying for continued enrollment, or a provider not currently enrolled at a location where the provider intends to provide goods or services to a Medi-Cal beneficiary, to submit a complete application package for enrollment, continuing enrollment, or enrollment at a new location or a change in location. [WIC § 14043.26]
- Requires applicants or providers to have an established place of business appropriate and adequate for the services billed or claimed to the Medi-Cal program as relevant to their scope of practice or type of business. [California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22, § 51000.60]
- Defines “telehealth” to:
- Mean the mode of delivering health care services and public health via information and communication technologies to facilitate the diagnosis, consultation, treatment, education, care management, and self-management of a patient’s health care; and,
- Include synchronous interactions and asynchronous store and forward transfers. [BPC § 2290.5 (a)(6)]
- Establishes a schedule of benefits under the Medi-Cal program. [WIC § 14132]
- Establishes Medi-Cal coverage for health care services provided through telehealth, including specifying that in-person, face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient is not required under the Medi-Cal program for covered health care services and provider types designated by DHCS, when those services and settings meet the applicable standard of care and meet the requirements of the service code being billed. [WIC § 14132.725 and § 14132.100]
- Prohibits a health care provider from establishing a new patient relationship with a Medi-Cal beneficiary via telehealth modalities other than video, except as follows:
- When exceptions are developed by DHCS in consultation with affected stakeholders and published in DHCS guidance.
- When a visit is conducted through an audio-only synchronous interaction and is otherwise consistent with DHCS guidance, and either one of the following is true:
- The visit is related to sensitive services; or,
- A patient requests an audio-only modality or attests they do not have access to video. [WIC § 14132.725]
- Defines “sensitive services” to include health care services related to mental or behavioral health, pregnancy, sexual and reproductive health, sexually transmitted infections, substance use disorder, gender affirming care, and intimate partner violence, and also includes health care services minors may independently consent to receive [Civil Code § 56.05]
- Authorizes a minor to consent to medical care related to the prevention or treatment of pregnancy. [Family Code § 6925]
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown. This bill has not yet been analyzed by a fiscal committee.
COMMENTS:
- PURPOSE OF THIS BILL. According to the author, for years, California has promoted access to reproductive health care without unnecessary burdens or restrictions on patients or providers. However, recent lawsuits and actions by the federal government are exploring ways to limit states’ ability to provide medication abortion drugs, posing a threat to Californians’ constitutional right to reproductive freedom. This bill enhances access to medication abortion in California by protecting health care providers, facilities, and patients who access abortion medication, while also expanding overall access to reproductive health care. The author states that this bill ensures that the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, secured by the California Constitution, remains protected. The author concludes that when access to the fundamental right to health care is under attack across the nation, this bill proactively seeks to ensure that the existing standard of practice for medication abortion remains legal in California.
- BACKGROUND. Every pregnant individual in California has the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion, a right guaranteed the California Constitution and supported by other state laws protecting access to sexual and reproductive health care in the state. However, at the federal level, there is uncertainty about the continued access of abortion care, specifically as it relates to mifepristone, a drug used for medication abortion. Since taking office, the Trump Administration has taken action to restrict access to reproductive and sexual health care and vocalized that additional steps are imminent, rolling back existing protections and advancements, access, and equity achieved for patients, providers, and health facilities.
In the first week of the Administration, President Trump signed an Executive Order directing agencies to review programs and calling for more stringent enforcement of the Hyde Amendment. Notably, the order indicates an intent to expand the reach of the Hyde Amendment, by further restricting not just the funding but also the “promotion” of abortion access, even in states like California. Additionally, despite years of research, the U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. further stated during his confirmation hearing that “President Trump has asked me to study the safety of mifepristone.” Similarly, the nominee for U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA) administrator, Martin Makary, also made no commitment to maintain current mifepristone policies in his confirmation hearing.
- Mifepristone. Medication abortion allows individuals to receive safe and effective abortion care in a less invasive manner. Over two-thirds of all abortions in the U.S. are medication abortions. Mifepristone, a drug used in combination with a second drug – misoprostol – was approved by the FDA in 2000 to terminate a pregnancy. Decades of evidence show that medication abortion and the drugs used in the process are safe and effective.
According to a March 2024 American Medical Association brief, “Reducing access to mifepristone would harm patients,” access to mifepristone significantly improves benefits for vulnerable communities, particularly those in rural areas, people of color, and low-income individuals, by expanding access to life-saving reproductive care. Mifepristone, when used with misoprostol, allows individuals to terminate pregnancies safely at home, which is especially crucial for those who live in maternity care deserts or face hardships traveling long distances for medical procedures.
- Disparities in access to care. For women of color, low-income women, and rural residents, the dangers of pregnancy in the U.S. are exacerbated, as they are more likely to experience severe maternal morbidity or even pregnancy-related deaths. Additionally, these populations are disproportionately affected by restrictions on abortion care. Studies show that people of color make up the majority of abortion patients, with 75% living at or below 200% of the federal poverty level. Moreover, pregnant individuals of color are more likely to face early pregnancy loss or miscarriage, conditions for which mifepristone is used in treatment. The ability to access abortion care via telehealth, which has been a lifeline for many in these communities, further underscores how mifepristone can be a critical tool in improving access to essential reproductive care, ensuring that vulnerable populations are not left behind in their healthcare needs.
- California Abortion Coverage. California law prohibits the state from denying or interfering with a person’s right to choose or obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus, or when medically necessary. The state defines viability as the point in a pregnancy when, in the good faith medical judgment of a physician, there is a reasonable likelihood that a fetus will survive outside the uterus without "extraordinary medical measures." Abortion is considered a basic health care service in California and, therefore, is required to be covered by commercial health insurance plans and policies. Medically necessary follow-up services to abortions that constitute basic health care services must also be covered. Similarly, Medi-Cal covers abortion and related services comprehensively as a state-funded benefit.
- Shield laws. Since the overturn of Roe v. Wade, eight states (California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington) have passed shield laws, which say that the state government will not comply with civil or criminal prosecutions targeting health care providers who perform abortions from their home states, including mailing medication to patients in places where the procedure is outlawed. Recently a doctor in New York was sued for mailing medication abortion to patients in Louisiana and Texas, two states in which abortion is heavily restricted. This bill seeks to mitigate the harm that could be caused if states can sue a doctor for dispensing or prescribing mifepristone by allowing pharmacists to keep certain information off of the prescription label. This policy has already been signed into law in New York.
- Telehealth. Telehealth is a mode of delivering health care services remotely using information technology. The three primary modalities are video, audio (including telephone), and asynchronous store and forward, which can be used when a real-time interaction is not needed. According to DHCS, from the beneficiary perspective, telehealth can improve access to care and enhance satisfaction by making care more convenient and reducing some of the logistical burdens of seeking in-person care.
- Medi-Cal Telehealth Policy. Medi-Cal allows most clinically appropriate services to be provided through telehealth. According to DHCS, California has been a leading state in the expansiveness of its coverage and reimbursement for services delivered via telehealth. DHCS has committed to continuing to enable broad telehealth coverage for all Medi-Cal covered benefits and services, as long as the provider is able to meet the standard of care, subject to billing, reimbursement, and utilization management policies developed by DHCS. In addition, DHCS notes Medi-Cal is unique among other state Medicaid programs in that the state reimburses audio-only visits at parity with in-person visits.
According to DHCS policy, a health care provider may bill Medi-Cal for a visit with a new patient that is conducted via video. Pursuant to AB 32 (Aguiar-Curry), Chapter 515, Statutes of 2022, Medi-Cal also allows a provider to bill for a visit with a new patient that is conducted via audio-only telehealth (e.g., phone or other audio device), but only under certain circumstances. These circumstances include when the visit is related to “sensitive services,” including behavioral health and reproductive health services, or when the patient requests an audio-only modality or attests they do not have access to video. Additional exceptions may be made by DHCS in consultation with stakeholders. This bill would apply similar reimbursement rules to the establishment of new patients through asynchronous store and forward telehealth.
- How AB 260 Changes Medi-Cal Telehealth Policy. This bill would essentially make such an exception to current policy that restricts the establishment of new patients via telehealth, expanding the circumstances under which a health care provider may bill for an asynchronous encounter with a new patient. Specifically:
- This bill would allow asynchronous store and forward to be used for new patient visits when a visit is related to “sensitive services” or when a patient requests one. The author and sponsor explain this exception is needed to reduce barriers to care for patients who may not have an existing relationship with a provider and who may struggle to arrange an audio or video visit. For instance, patients commonly reach out to a provider outside of their normal source of care for birth control, emergency contraception, and urinary tract infection treatment.
- This bill also includes, in the definition of asynchronous store and forward, electronic transmission initiated directly by patients, including through mobile telephone applications (“apps”). According to the bill’s sponsors, this is important to allow for Medi-Cal patients to be able to access asynchronous services from Medi-Cal providers through apps, often the same apps used for synchronous telehealth services.
- How AB 260 Changes Medi-Cal Telehealth Policy. This bill would essentially make such an exception to current policy that restricts the establishment of new patients via telehealth, expanding the circumstances under which a health care provider may bill for an asynchronous encounter with a new patient. Specifically:
- SUPPORT. Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California (PPAC) is the sponsor of this bill and states that medication abortion, and broad access to it, allows individuals to receive safe and effective abortion care in a least-invasive manner. Any federal threats to restrict medication abortion and the drugs used are not only dangerous and risky, but also a direct attack on the state’s constitutional right to reproductive freedom. PPAC notes that mifepristone, a drug used in combination with a second drug – misoprostol – to terminate a pregnancy through medication abortion, was approved by the FDA in 2000. Accordingly, scientists have studied the safety of mifepristone for over 25 years, and these decades of evidence show that medication abortion and the drugs used in the process are safe and effective.
PPAC points to the fact that President Trump’s appointees to lead the Health and Human Services Agency and the FDA have both made comments in their confirmation hearings about reevaluating mifepristone policies and its safety. With these vocalized, ongoing threats to eliminate legal protections and reduce access to medication abortion at the federal level, California must continue to lead in defending and safeguarding access to safe and accessible abortion care.
PPAC argues that this bill protects medication abortion by establishing that the current standard of care for the use of mifepristone will remain legal in this state, protecting providers that legally provide mifepristone, requiring the continuation of existing coverage for medication abortion, and expanding access to reproductive health care through telehealth. Proactively taking steps to protect care will help to ensure that there will not be an interruption of access to medication abortion care in California. PPAC concludes that when access to the fundamental right to health care is under attack across the nation, this bill proactively codifies that the existing standard of practice for medication abortion so that it remains legal in California, regardless of federal actions.
- RELATED LEGISLATION.
- AB 40 (Bonta) would clarify in current law that “emergency services and care” includes abortion and other reproductive health services, as necessary to relieve or eliminate an emergency medical condition. Contains an urgency clause to ensure that the provisions of this bill go into immediate effect upon enactment. AB 40 was heard in the Assembly Health Committee on April 1, 2025, and passed with a vote of 12-0.
- AB 50 (Bonta) would authorize a pharmacist to furnish over-the-counter contraceptives without having to comply with the standardized procedures or protocols that are required for prescription-only hormonal contraceptives. AB 50 is pending in the Assembly Health Committee.
- AB 54 (Krell) would reaffirm that it has been, and would continue to be, lawful to cause the delivery of, or mail, ship, take, receive, or otherwise transport, any drug, medicine, or instrument that can be designed or adapted to produce an abortion that is lawful in the State of California. Sets forth provisions regarding the lack of civil or criminal liability, or professional disciplinary action, for accessing or administering mifepristone or misoprostol, among other certain conduct, on or after January 1, 2020, with this bill applied retroactively, as specified. AB 54 is pending in the Assembly Health Committee.
- AB 67 (Bauer-Kahan) would impose a civil penalty not exceeding $25,000 upon any person or governmental entity that violates any provision of the Reproductive Privacy Act and a civil penalty for violation of the bill’s provisions. The bill would require any costs, fees, and civil penalties collected pursuant to these provisions to be available to the office of the Attorney General upon appropriation of the Legislature for exclusive use by the Attorney General for enforcement of act. AB 67 is pending in the Assembly Judiciary Committee.
- PREVIOUS LEGISLATION.
- AB 1918 (Petrie-Norris), Chapter 561, Statutes of 2022, establishes the California Reproductive Health Service Corps program within HCAI to reduce the debt burden of current and future health care professionals dedicated to providing reproductive health care in underserved areas of California.
- AB 2091 (Mia Bonta), Chapter 628, Statutes of 2022, prohibits compelling a person to identify or provide information that would identify an individual who has sought or obtained an abortion in a state, county, city, or other local criminal, administrative, legislative, or other proceeding.
- AB 2134 (Akilah Weber), Chapter 562, Statutes of 2022, establishes the California Reproductive Health Equity Program within HCAI to ensure abortion and contraception services are affordable for and accessible to all patients and to provide financial support for safety net providers of these services.
- AB 2223 (Wicks), Chapter 629, Statutes of 2022, prohibits a person from being subject to civil or criminal liability, or otherwise deprived of their rights, based on their actions or omissions with respect to their pregnancy or actual, potential, or alleged pregnancy outcome or based solely on their actions to aid or assist a pregnant person who is exercising their reproductive rights.
- SCA 10 (Atkins) Chapter 97, Statutes of 2022, enacts a constitutional amendment, expressly providing that the state shall not deny or interfere with an individual's reproductive freedom in their most intimate decisions, which includes their fundamental right to choose to have an abortion and their fundamental right to choose or refuse contraceptives.
- SB 1301 (Sheila Kuehl), Chapter 385, Statutes of 2002, enacts the Reproductive Privacy Act, which provides that every individual possesses a fundamental right of privacy with respect to reproductive decisions, including the fundamental right to choose or refuse birth control, and the fundamental right to choose to bear a child or obtain an abortion.
- DOUBLE REFERRAL. This bill is double-referred, upon passage of this committee, it will be referred to the Assembly Committee on Business & Professions.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California (sponsor)
Essential Access Health (cosponsor)
National Health Law Program (cosponsor)
Access Reproductive Justice (cosponsor)
California Latinas for Reproductive Justice (cosponsor)
URGE (cosponsor)
Attorney General Rob Bonta
Black Women for Wellness Action Project
Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis
Reproductive Freedom for All CA
Teach
Opposition
None on file
Analysis Prepared by: Lara Flynn, Eliza Brooks, Riana King, and Lisa Murawski / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097
Discussed in Hearing
Assembly Floor
Senate Floor
Senate Standing Committee on Business, Professions and Economic Development
Senate Standing Committee on Health
Assembly Floor
Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
Assembly Standing Committee on Business and Professions
Assembly Standing Committee on Health
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):