SB 585: Disability access: construction-related accessibility claims: statutory damages: attorney’s fees and costs.
- Session Year: 2023-2024
- House: Senate
Current Status:
Failed
(2023-06-08: Referred to Com. on JUD.)
Introduced
First Committee Review
First Chamber
Second Committee Review
Second Chamber
Enacted
Existing law prohibits discrimination on the basis of various specified personal characteristics, including disability. Existing law imposes minimum statutory damages for construction-related accessibility claims if the violation of a construction-related accessibility standard denied the plaintiff full and equal access to the place of public accommodation on a particular occasion, including by causing difficulty, discomfort, or embarrassment. Existing law, for claims filed on or after a specified date, presumes that certain technical violations do not cause a person difficulty, discomfort, or embarrassment for these purposes if specified criteria are satisfied. Existing law limits a defendants liability for statutory damages under specified conditions, including if a defendant corrects the construction-related violations within a specified time.
This bill would prohibit a construction-related accessibility claim for statutory damages from being initiated in a legal proceeding against a defendant who employs 50 or fewer individuals, as specified, until the defendant has been served with a demand letter specifying each alleged violation of a construction-related accessibility standard and given 120 days to correct the alleged violation. The bill would provide that a defendant is not liable for statutory damages, plaintiffs attorneys fees, or costs for an alleged violation that is corrected within 120 days of service of a demand letter alleging the violation. The bill would also prohibit a plaintiff from avoiding the notice and opportunity to correct provisions and the liability limitations by claiming they are seeking general discrimination damages based on a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 if the underlying claim is based on a defendants failure to comply with physical accessibility standards under California law.
Discussed in Hearing
View Older HearingsBill Author