AB 1522: State Bar Act: expedited licensure: federal attorneys.
- Session Year: 2025-2026
- House: Assembly
Current Status:
In Progress
(2025-06-17: In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.)
Introduced
First Committee Review
First Chamber
Second Committee Review
Second Chamber
Enacted
The State Bar Act provides for the licensure and regulation of attorneys by the State Bar of California, California (State Bar), a public corporation governed by a board of trustees. The act requires a person who has been admitted to practice law in specified jurisdictions outside of this state, including a sister state, in order to be certified to the Supreme Court for admission and a license to practice law in this state, to meet certain criteria, including having passed the general bar examination or Attorneys Examination, as applicable, given by the examining committee.
This bill would require the State Bar to transmit, on or before January 1, 2026, a proposal outlining a process for expediting the licensure to practice law in this state of an attorney who meets certain criteria, including that the attorney was employed by an agency of the federal government on January 20, 2025. The bill would define expediting the licensure to mean a licensing process that does not require an attorney to take either the general bar examination or the attorneys examination. The bill would exclude any person eligible for licensure as an attorney pursuant to this process from the requirement that the person pass the general bar examination or attorneys examination to be certified to the Supreme Court for admission and a license to practice law in this state.
The act State Bar Act also provides for the investigation and discipline of a licensee of the State Bar and authorizes the Supreme Court to suspend or disbar an attorney for specified causes, including for a conviction under the laws of another state or territory of the United States that is deemed a felony. Existing law provides that specified evidence that a licensee committed professional misconduct in another jurisdiction is conclusive evidence that the licensee is culpable of professional misconduct.
This bill would provide that an excluded event shall not be grounds for disciplinary action or require an attorney or applicant to report the excluded event to the State Bar, supply evidence that an attorney is culpable of professional misconduct in this state, or serve as grounds to deny admission to the State Bar to an applicant. The bill would define excluded event to mean certain actions taken when based on the application of another states law that interferes with any persons right to receive, provide, recommend, enable, or advocate for sensitive services, as defined, that would be lawful in this state.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Discussed in Hearing
View Older Hearings
