SB 27: Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Court Program.
- Session Year: 2025-2026
- House: Senate
- Latest Version Date: 2025-10-10
Current Status:
Passed
(2025-10-10: Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 528, Statutes of 2025.)
Introduced
In Committee
Awaiting First Chamber Vote
Passed First Chamber
In Committee
Awaiting Second Chamber Vote
Passed Second Chamber
Enacted
What does this bill do?
The bill expands the CARE Act so courts and county behavioral health agencies can more easily move adults with serious psychotic illnesses into CARE court, adding bipolar I with psychotic features to eligible diagnoses and allowing a prima facie finding without a hearing. It also allows felony referrals, lets CARE courts treat some referrals as petitions, permits nurse practitioners and physician assistants to sign affidavits, lets county agencies and jail medical providers share medical records with the court to assess likely eligibility, and gives judges flexibility to call extra progress hearings.
The summary is provided by generative AI which can make mistakes. For original language, please view the details in the table below.
Existing law, the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act, authorizes specified adult persons to petition a civil court to create a voluntary CARE agreement or a court-ordered CARE plan and implement services, to be provided by county behavioral health agencies, to provide behavioral health care, including stabilization medication, housing, and other enumerated services, to adults who are currently experiencing a severe mental illness and have a diagnosis identified in the disorder class schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, and who meet other specified criteria. Existing law authorizes a specified individual to commence the CARE process, known as the original petitioner. Existing law authorizes the court to dismiss a case without prejudice when the court finds that a petitioner has not made a prima facie showing that they qualify for the CARE process. Existing law requires the court to take prescribed actions if it finds that a prima facie showing has been made, including, but not limited to, setting the matter for an initial appearance on the petition. Existing law requires the court, if it determines the parties have entered or are likely to enter into a CARE agreement, to either approve or modify the CARE agreement and continue the matter at a progress hearing in 60 days, or continue the matter for 14 days to allow the parties additional time to enter into an agreement.
Existing law prohibits a person from being tried or adjudged to punishment while that person is mentally incompetent. Existing law requires the court to, for a person found mentally incompetent and not charged with certain offenses, among other things, determine whether restoring the person to mental competence is in the interests of justice. Existing law requires the court to, if restoring the person to mental competence is not in the interests of justice, conduct a hearing, as specified, and determine the persons eligibility for diversion. Under existing law, if the court determines, at the first hearing, that the person is ineligible for diversion, the court is required to hold a hearing to determine the persons other options, including the CARE program.
Existing law authorizes a court to refer an individual from, among other things, assisted outpatient treatment or conservatorship proceedings, as specified, to CARE Act proceedings. Existing law provides that if the individual is referred from assisted outpatient treatment, the county behavioral health director or their designee shall be the petitioner, whereas if the referral is from conservatorship proceedings, the conservator or proposed conservator is the petitioner.
This bill would allow the court to make a prima facie determination without conducting a hearing. The bill, in the first hearing to determine competence to stand trial, would authorize the court to consider the petitioners eligibility for both diversion and the CARE program. The bill would authorize the court to refer the petitioner to the CARE Act court if the defendant or counsel for the defendant agrees to the referral and the court has reason to believe the petitioner may be eligible for the CARE program. If the petitioner is not accepted into the CARE program or if the CARE Act court refers the petitioner back to criminal court, as specified, the bill would require the criminal court to conduct a hearing to determine whether the petitioner is eligible for a diversion program. The bill would authorize the county behavioral health agency and jail medical providers to share confidential medical records and other relevant information with the court for the purpose of determining likelihood of eligibility for behavioral health services and programs.
The bill would authorize the court to call additional progress hearings after 60 days. The bill would also include persons suffering from bipolar I disorder with psychotic features, except for psychosis related to current intoxication, in the disorder class.
The bill would additionally authorize a court to refer an individual from felony proceedings, as specified, to the CARE Act program. The bill would authorize a CARE Act court to consider a referral as a petition for participation in the CARE program if certain requirements are met. The bill would make additional technical and conforming changes.
Existing law requires the Judicial Council to develop a mandatory form for use to file a CARE process petition with the court, and requires the petition to be signed under penalty of perjury and include either an affidavit of a licensed behavioral health professional, as defined, or evidence that the respondent was detained for a minimum of 2 intensive treatments, as specified.
The bill would additionally include a nurse practitioner and physician assistant as a licensed behavioral health professional for purposes of individuals authorized to prepare an affidavit supporting a CARE process petition.
By increasing various duties on county behavioral health agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Existing law, the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act, authorizes specified adult persons to petition a civil court to create a voluntary CARE agreement or a court-ordered CARE plan and implement services, to be provided by county behavioral health agencies, to provide behavioral health care, including stabilization medication, housing, and other enumerated services, to adults who are currently experiencing a severe mental illness and have a diagnosis identified in the disorder class schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, and who meet other specified criteria. Existing law authorizes a specified individual to commence the CARE process, known as the original petitioner. Existing law authorizes the court to dismiss a case without prejudice when the court finds that a petitioner has not made a prima facie showing that they qualify for the CARE process. Existing law requires the court to take prescribed actions if it finds that a prima facie showing has been made, including, but not limited to, setting the matter for an initial appearance on the petition. Existing law requires the court, if it determines the parties have entered or are likely to enter into a CARE agreement, to either approve or modify the CARE agreement and continue the matter at a progress hearing in 60 days, or continue the matter for 14 days to allow the parties additional time to enter into an agreement.
Existing law prohibits a person from being tried or adjudged to punishment while that person is mentally incompetent. Existing law requires the court to, for a person found mentally incompetent and not charged with certain offenses, among other things, determine whether restoring the person to mental competence is in the interests of justice. Existing law requires the court to, if restoring the person to mental competence is not in the interests of justice, conduct a hearing, as specified, and determine the persons eligibility for diversion. Under existing law, if the court determines, at the first hearing, that the person is ineligible for diversion, the court is required to hold a hearing to determine the persons other options, including the CARE program.
Existing law authorizes a court to refer an individual from, among other things, assisted outpatient treatment or conservatorship proceedings, as specified, to CARE Act proceedings. Existing law provides that if the individual is referred from assisted outpatient treatment, the county behavioral health director or their designee shall be the petitioner, whereas if the referral is from conservatorship proceedings, the conservator or proposed conservator is the petitioner.
This bill would allow the court to make a prima facie determination without conducting a hearing. The bill, in the first hearing to determine competence to stand trial, would authorize the court to consider the petitioners eligibility for both diversion and the CARE program. The bill would authorize the court to refer the petitioner to the CARE Act court if the defendant or counsel for the defendant agrees to the referral and the court has reason to believe the petitioner may be eligible for the CARE program. If the petitioner is not accepted into the CARE program or if the CARE Act court refers the petitioner back to criminal court, as specified, the bill would require the criminal court to conduct a hearing to determine whether the petitioner is eligible for a diversion program. The bill would authorize the county behavioral health agency and jail medical providers to share confidential medical records and other relevant information with the court for the purpose of determining likelihood of eligibility for behavioral health services and programs.
The bill would authorize the court to call additional progress hearings after 60 days. The bill would also include persons suffering from bipolar I disorder with psychotic features, except for psychosis related to current intoxication, in the disorder class.
The bill would additionally authorize a court to refer an individual from felony proceedings, as specified, to the CARE Act program. The bill would authorize a CARE Act court to consider a referral as a petition for participation in the CARE program if certain requirements are met. The bill would make additional technical and conforming changes.
Existing law requires the Judicial Council to develop a mandatory form for use to file a CARE process petition with the court, and requires the petition to be signed under penalty of perjury and include either an affidavit of a licensed behavioral health professional, as defined, or evidence that the respondent was detained for a minimum of 2 intensive treatments, as specified.
The bill would additionally include a nurse practitioner and physician assistant as a licensed behavioral health professional for purposes of individuals authorized to prepare an affidavit supporting a CARE process petition.
By increasing various duties on county behavioral health agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Existing law, the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act, authorizes specified adult persons to petition a civil court to create a voluntary CARE agreement or a court-ordered CARE plan and implement services, to be provided by county behavioral health agencies, to provide behavioral health care, including stabilization medication, housing, and other enumerated services, to adults who are currently experiencing a severe mental illness and have a diagnosis identified in the disorder class schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, and who meet other specified criteria. Existing law authorizes a specified individual to commence the CARE process, known as the original petitioner. Existing law authorizes the court to dismiss a case without prejudice when the court finds that a petitioner has not made a prima facie showing that they qualify for the CARE process. Existing law requires the court to take prescribed actions if it finds that a prima facie showing has been made, including, but not limited to, setting the matter for an initial appearance on the petition. Existing law requires the court, if it determines the parties have entered or are likely to enter into a CARE agreement, to either approve or modify the CARE agreement and continue the matter at a progress hearing in 60 days, or continue the matter for 14 days to allow the parties additional time to enter into an agreement.
Existing law prohibits a person from being tried or adjudged to punishment while that person is mentally incompetent. Existing law requires the court to, for a person found mentally incompetent and not charged with certain offenses, among other things, determine whether restoring the person to mental competence is in the interests of justice. Existing law requires the court to, if restoring the person to mental competence is not in the interests of justice, conduct a hearing, as specified, and determine the persons eligibility for diversion. Under existing law, if the court determines, at the first hearing, that the person is ineligible for diversion, the court is required to hold a hearing to determine the persons other options, including the CARE program.
Existing law authorizes a court to refer an individual from, among other things, assisted outpatient treatment or conservatorship proceedings, as specified, to CARE Act proceedings. Existing law provides that if the individual is referred from assisted outpatient treatment, the county behavioral health director or their designee shall be the petitioner, whereas if the referral is from conservatorship proceedings, the conservator or proposed conservator is the petitioner.
This bill would allow the court to make a prima facie determination without conducting a hearing. The bill, in the first hearing to determine competence to stand trial, would authorize the court to consider the petitioners eligibility for both diversion and the CARE program. The bill would authorize the court to refer the petitioner to the CARE Act court if the defendant or counsel for the defendant agrees to the referral and the court has reason to believe the petitioner may be eligible for the CARE program. If the petitioner is not accepted into the CARE program or if the CARE Act court refers the petitioner back to criminal court, as specified, the bill would require the criminal court to conduct a hearing to determine whether the petitioner is eligible for a diversion program. The bill would authorize the county behavioral health agency and jail medical providers to share confidential medical records and other relevant information with the court for the purpose of determining likelihood of eligibility for behavioral health services and programs.
The bill would authorize the court to call additional progress hearings after 60 days. The bill would also include persons suffering from bipolar I disorder with psychotic features, except for psychosis related to current intoxication, in the disorder class.
The bill would additionally authorize a court to refer an individual from felony proceedings, as specified, to the CARE Act program. The bill would authorize a CARE Act court to consider a referral as a petition for participation in the CARE program if certain requirements are met. The bill would make additional technical and conforming changes.
Existing law requires the Judicial Council to develop a mandatory form for use to file a CARE process petition with the court, and requires the petition to be signed under penalty of perjury and include either an affidavit of a licensed behavioral health professional, as defined, or evidence that the respondent was detained for a minimum of 2 intensive treatments, as specified.
The bill would additionally include a nurse practitioner and physician assistant as a licensed behavioral health professional for purposes of individuals authorized to prepare an affidavit supporting a CARE process petition.
By increasing various duties on county behavioral health agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.Existing law, the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act, authorizes specified adult persons to petition a civil court to create a voluntary CARE agreement or a court-ordered CARE plan and implement services, to be provided by county behavioral health agencies, to provide behavioral health care, including stabilization medication, housing, and other enumerated services, to adults who are currently experiencing a severe mental illness and have a diagnosis identified in the disorder class schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, and who meet other specified criteria. Existing law authorizes a specified individual to commence the CARE process, known as the original petitioner. Existing law authorizes the court to dismiss a case without prejudice when the court finds that a petitioner has not made a prima facie showing that they qualify for the CARE process. Existing law requires the court to take prescribed actions if it finds that a prima facie showing has been made, including, but not limited to, setting the matter for an initial appearance on the petition. Existing law requires the court, if it determines the parties have entered or are likely to enter into a CARE agreement, to either approve or modify the CARE agreement and continue the matter at a progress hearing in 60 days, or continue the matter for 14 days to allow the parties additional time to enter into an agreement.
Existing law prohibits a person from being tried or adjudged to punishment while that person is mentally incompetent. Existing law requires the court to, for a person found mentally incompetent and not charged with certain offenses, among other things, determine whether restoring the person to mental competence is in the interests of justice. Existing law requires the court to, if restoring the person to mental competence is not in the interests of justice, conduct a hearing, as specified, and determine the persons eligibility for diversion. Under existing law, if the court determines, at the first hearing, that the person is ineligible for diversion, the court is required to hold a hearing to determine the persons other options, including the CARE program.
Existing law authorizes a court to refer an individual from, among other things, assisted outpatient treatment or conservatorship proceedings, as specified, to CARE Act proceedings. Existing law provides that if the individual is referred from assisted outpatient treatment, the county behavioral health director or their designee shall be the petitioner, whereas if the referral is from conservatorship proceedings, the conservator or proposed conservator is the petitioner.
This bill would allow the court to conduct the initial appearance on the petition at the same time as the prima facie determination if specified requirements are met. make a prima facie determination without conducting a hearing. The bill, in the first hearing to determine competence to stand trial, would authorize the court to consider the petitioners eligibility for both diversion and the CARE program. The bill would authorize the court to refer the petitioner to the CARE Act court if the defendant or counsel for the defendant agrees to the referral and the court has reason to believe the petitioner may be eligible for the CARE program. If the petitioner is not accepted into the CARE program or if the CARE Act court refers the petitioner back to criminal court, as specified, the bill would require the criminal court to conduct a hearing to determine whether the petitioner is eligible for a diversion program. The bill would authorize the county behavioral health agency and jail medical providers to share confidential medical records and other relevant information with the court for the purpose of determining likelihood of eligibility for behavioral health services and programs.
The bill would authorize the court to call additional progress hearings after 60 days. The bill would also include persons suffering from mood disorders bipolar I disorder with psychotic features, except for psychosis related to current intoxication, in the disorder class.
The bill would additionally authorize a court to refer an individual from felony proceedings, as specified, to the CARE Act program. The bill would authorize a CARE Act court to consider a referral as a petition for participation in the CARE program if certain requirements are met. The bill would make additional technical and conforming changes.
Existing law requires the Judicial Council to develop a mandatory form for use to file a CARE process petition with the court, and requires the petition to be signed under penalty of perjury and include either an affidavit of a licensed behavioral health professional, as defined, or evidence that the respondent was detained for a minimum of 2 intensive treatments, as specified.
The bill would additionally include a nurse practitioner and physician assistant as a licensed behavioral health professional for purposes of individuals authorized to prepare an affidavit supporting a CARE process petition.
By increasing various duties on county behavioral health agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing law defines licensed medical professional for purposes of the CARE Court program.This bill would include nurse practitioners and physician assistants in that definition.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Existing law, the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act, authorizes specified adult persons to petition a civil court to create a voluntary CARE agreement or a court-ordered CARE plan and implement services, to be provided by county behavioral health agencies, to provide behavioral health care, including stabilization medication, housing, and other enumerated services, to adults who are currently experiencing a severe mental illness and have a diagnosis identified in the disorder class schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, and who meet other specified criteria. Existing law authorizes a specified individual to commence the CARE process, known as the original petitioner. Existing law authorizes the court to dismiss a case without prejudice when the court finds that a petitioner has not made a prima facie showing that they qualify for the CARE process. Existing law requires the court to take prescribed actions if it finds that a prima facie showing has been made, including, but not limited to, setting the matter for an initial appearance on the petition. Existing law requires the court, if it determines the parties have entered or are likely to enter into a CARE agreement, to either approve or modify the CARE agreement and continue the matter at a progress hearing in 60 days, or continue the matter for 14 days to allow the parties additional time to enter into an agreement.
Existing law prohibits a person from being tried or adjudged to punishment while that person is mentally incompetent. Existing law requires the court to, for a person found mentally incompetent and not charged with certain offenses, among other things, determine whether restoring the person to mental competence is in the interests of justice. Existing law requires the court to, if restoring the person to mental competence is not in the interests of justice, conduct a hearing, as specified, and determine the persons eligibility for diversion. Under existing law, if the court determines, at the first hearing, that the person is ineligible for diversion, the court is required to hold a hearing to determine the persons other options, including the CARE program.
Existing law authorizes a court to refer an individual from, among other things, assisted outpatient treatment or conservatorship proceedings, as specified, to CARE Act proceedings. Existing law provides that if the individual is referred from assisted outpatient treatment, the county behavioral health director or their designee shall be the petitioner, whereas if the referral is from conservatorship proceedings, the conservator or proposed conservator is the petitioner.
This bill would allow the court to conduct the initial appearance on the petition at the same time as the prima facie determination if specified requirements are met. The bill, in the first hearing to determine competence to stand trial, would authorize the court to consider the petitioners eligibility for both diversion and the CARE program. The bill would authorize the county behavioral health agency and jail medical providers to share confidential medical records and other relevant information with the court for the purpose of determining likelihood of eligibility for behavioral health services and programs.
The bill would authorize the court to call additional progress hearings after 60 days. The bill would also include persons suffering from mood disorders with psychotic features, except for psychosis related to current intoxication, in the disorder class.
The bill would additionally authorize a court to refer an individual from felony proceedings, as specified, to the CARE Act program. The bill would authorize a CARE Act court to consider a referral as a petition for participation in the CARE program if certain requirements are met. The bill would make additional technical and conforming changes.
By increasing various duties on county behavioral health agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing law defines licensed medical professional for purposes of the CARE Court program.
This bill would include nurse practitioners and physician assistants in that definition.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Existing law, the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act, authorizes specified adult persons to petition a civil court to create a voluntary CARE agreement or a court-ordered CARE plan and implement services, to be provided by county behavioral health agencies, to provide behavioral health care, including stabilization medication, housing, and other enumerated services, to adults who are currently experiencing a severe mental illness and have a diagnosis identified in the disorder class schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, and who meet other specified criteria. Existing law authorizes a specified individual to commence the CARE process, known as the original petitioner. Existing law authorizes the court to dismiss a case without prejudice when the court finds that a petitioner has not made a prima facie showing that they qualify for the CARE process. Existing law requires the court to take prescribed actions if it finds that a prima facie showing has been made, including, but not limited to, setting the matter for an initial appearance on the petition.
This bill would allow the court to conduct the initial appearance on the petition at the same time as the prima facie determination if specified requirements are met.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
(a)If the defendant is found mentally competent, the criminal process shall resume, and the trial on the offense charged or hearing on the alleged violation shall proceed.
(b)If the defendant is found mentally incompetent, the trial, judgment, or hearing on the alleged violation shall be suspended and the court shall, after notice to the defendant, defense counsel, and the prosecution, hold a hearing to determine whether to do one or more of the following:
(1)(A)(i)Conduct a hearing, pursuant to Chapter 2.8A (commencing with Section 1001.35) of Title 6, and, if the court deems the defendant eligible and suitable, grant diversion pursuant to Section 1001.36 for a period not to exceed one year from the date the individual is accepted into diversion or the maximum term of imprisonment provided by law for the most serious offense charged in the misdemeanor complaint, whichever is shorter.
(ii)Notwithstanding any other law, including Section 23640 of the Vehicle Code, a misdemeanor offense for which a defendant may be placed in a mental health diversion program in accordance with this section includes a misdemeanor violation of Section 23152 or 23153 of the Vehicle Code. However, this section does not limit the authority of the Department of Motor Vehicles to take administrative action concerning the driving privileges of a person arrested for a violation of Section 23152 or 23153 of the Vehicle Code.
(B)Any hearing to determine eligibility and suitability for diversion shall be held no later than 30 days after the finding of incompetence. If the hearing is delayed beyond 30 days, the court shall order the defendant to be released on their own recognizance pending the hearing.
(C)If the defendant performs satisfactorily on diversion pursuant to this section, at the end of the period of diversion, the court shall dismiss the criminal charges that were the subject of the criminal proceedings at the time of the initial diversion.
(2)Refer the defendant to the CARE Act court pursuant to Section 5978 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, if the defendant or counsel for the defendant agrees to the referral and the court has reason to believe that the defendant may be eligible for the CARE program. The CARE Act court shall hold a hearing to determine eligibility for the CARE program within 30 court days after the date of the referral. If the hearing is delayed beyond 30 court days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in a county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing. If the defendant is accepted into the CARE program, the CARE Act court shall notify the criminal court of the acceptance, and the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 six months after the date of the referral to the CARE program, unless the defendants case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that six-month time period. If the defendant is not accepted into the CARE program or if the CARE Act court refers the defendant back to criminal court before the expiration of the six-month time period, the court shall proceed as provided in paragraph (1). Except as provided in this section and Sections 5978 and 5978.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, this paragraph does not alter the confidential nature of CARE program proceedings.
(c)If the court finds the defendant ineligible or unsuitable for diversion based on the circumstances set forth in subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (g) of Section 1001.36, the court shall, after notice to the defendant, defense counsel, and the prosecution, hold a hearing to determine which one of the following actions the court will take:
(1)Order modification of an existing mental health diversion treatment plan in accordance with a recommendation from the treatment provider.
(2)Refer the defendant to assisted outpatient treatment pursuant to Section 5346 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. A referral to assisted outpatient treatment may only occur in a county where services are available pursuant to Section 5348 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, and the agency agrees to accept responsibility for treatment of the defendant. A hearing to determine eligibility for assisted outpatient treatment shall be held within 45 days after the finding of incompetency. If the hearing is delayed beyond 45 days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing. If the defendant is accepted into assisted outpatient treatment, the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 six months after the date of the referral to assisted outpatient treatment, unless the defendants case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that time period. This section does not alter the confidential nature of assisted outpatient treatment.
(3)Refer the defendant to the county conservatorship investigator in the county of commitment for possible conservatorship proceedings for the defendant pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 5350) of Part 1 of Division 5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. A defendant shall only be referred to the conservatorship investigator if, based on the opinion of a qualified mental health expert, the defendant appears to be gravely disabled, as defined in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (h) of Section 5008 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. Any hearings required in the conservatorship proceedings shall be held in the superior court in the county of commitment. The court shall transmit a copy of the order directing initiation of conservatorship proceedings to the county mental health director or the directors designee and shall notify the county mental health director or their designee of the outcome of the proceedings. Before establishing a conservatorship, the public guardian shall investigate all available alternatives to conservatorship pursuant to Section 5354 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. If a petition is not filed within 30 days of the referral, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending conservatorship proceedings. If the outcome of the conservatorship proceedings results in the filing of a petition for the establishment of a temporary or permanent conservatorship, the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 90 days after the date of the filing of the petition, unless the defendants case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that time period. This section does not alter the confidential nature of conservatorship proceedings.
(4)Refer the defendant to the CARE Act court pursuant to Section 5978 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. The CARE Act court shall hold a hearing to determine eligibility for the CARE program within 14 court days after the date that the petition is filed. If the hearing is delayed beyond 14 court days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in a county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing. If the defendant is accepted into the CARE program, the CARE Act court shall notify the criminal court of the acceptance, and the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 six months after the date of the referral to the CARE program, unless the defendants case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that time period. Except as provided in this section and Sections 5978 and 5978.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, this paragraph does not alter the confidential nature of CARE program proceedings.
(5)If the defendant does not qualify for services pursuant to paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive, dismiss the charges.
(d)It is the intent of the Legislature that a defendant subject to the terms of this section receive mental health treatment in a treatment facility and not a jail. A term of four days will be deemed to have been served for every two days spent in actual custody against the maximum period of treatment pursuant to paragraphs (2) and (4) of subdivision (c) and paragraphs (1) and (2) of subdivision (b), if applicable. A defendant not in actual custody shall otherwise receive day for day credit against the term of treatment from the date the defendant is accepted into treatment in the event that the criminal charges have not previously been dismissed. Actual custody has the same meaning as in Section 4019.
(e)The county behavioral health agency and jail medical providers may share confidential medical records and other relevant information with the court, including, but not limited to, prior interactions with and treatment of the defendant, for the purpose of determining likelihood of eligibility for behavioral health services and programs pursuant to this section. The disclosure of information pursuant to this subdivision is subject to applicable state and federal privacy laws.
(f)This section shall apply only as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 1367.
(g)It is the intent of the Legislature that the court shall consider all treatment options as provided in this section prior to dismissing criminal charges. However, nothing in this section limits a courts discretion pursuant to Section 1385.
SEC. 2.Section 5971 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5971.Unless the context otherwise requires, the following definitions shall govern the construction of this part.
(a)CARE agreement means a voluntary settlement agreement entered into by the parties. A CARE agreement includes the same elements as a CARE plan to support the respondent in accessing community-based services and supports.
(b)CARE plan means an individualized, appropriate range of community-based services and supports, as set forth in this part, which include clinically appropriate behavioral health care and stabilization medications, housing, and other supportive services, as appropriate, pursuant to Section 5982.
(c)CARE process means the court and related proceedings to implement the CARE Act.
(d)Clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment means both of the following:
(1)The persons condition is stable and not deteriorating.
(2)The person is currently engaged in treatment and managing symptoms through medication or other therapeutic interventions. Enrollment in treatment alone shall not be considered clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment.
(e)Counsel means the attorney representing the respondent, appointed pursuant to Section 5977, or chosen by the respondent, in CARE Act proceedings and matters related to CARE agreements and CARE plans. Representation of a respondent in these matters does not alter counsels obligations under the State Bar Act and the Rules of Professional Conduct, including subdivision (e) of Section 6068 of the Business and Professions Code and rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.
(f)County behavioral health agency means the local director of mental health services described in Section 5607, the local behavioral health director, or both as applicable, or their designee.
(g)Court-ordered evaluation means an evaluation ordered by a superior court pursuant to Section 5977.1.
(h)Department means the State Department of Health Care Services.
(i)Graduation plan means a voluntary agreement entered into by the parties at the end of the CARE program that includes a strategy to support a successful transition out of court jurisdiction and that may include a psychiatric advance directive. A graduation plan includes the same elements as a CARE plan to support the respondent in accessing community-based services and supports. The graduation plan shall not place additional requirements on the local government entities and is not enforceable by the court.
(j)Homeless outreach worker means a person who engages people experiencing homelessness to assess for unmet needs, offer information, services, or other assistance, or provide care coordination.
(k)Indian health care provider means a health care program operated by the Indian Health Service, an Indian tribe, a tribal organization, or urban Indian organization (I/T/U) as those terms are defined in Section 4 of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1603).
(l)Legal proceeding means any administrative, civil, or criminal proceeding, including, but not limited to, juvenile court proceedings and family court proceedings and services, and any form of alternative dispute resolution, including arbitration and mediation, except for the following:
(1)A proceeding under this part.
(2)A proceeding under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act described in paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 5979.
(3)A proceeding from which the respondent was referred to CARE Act proceedings as described in Section 5978.
(4)A disciplinary proceeding under Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 6000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code.
(5)An appeal from any of the proceedings identified in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive.
(m)Licensed behavioral health professional means either of the following:
(1)A licensed mental health professional, as defined in subdivision (j) of Section 4096.
(2)A person who has been granted a waiver of licensure requirements by the department pursuant to Section 5751.2.
(n)Parties means the petitioner, the respondent, the county behavioral health agency in the county where proceedings under this part are pending, and any local governmental entity added by the court pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 5977.1.
(o)Petitioner means the person who files the CARE Act petition with the court. Additionally, if the petitioner is a person listed in Section 5974 other than the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the petitioner shall have the right to file a petition with the court, but at the initial hearing the court shall substitute the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, of the county in which the proceedings are filed as petitioner. The original petitioner may, at the courts discretion and in furtherance of the interests of the respondent, retain rights as described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (6) of subdivision (b) of Section 5977.
(p)Psychiatric advance directive means a legal document, executed on a voluntary basis in accordance with the requirements for advance health care directives in Division 4.7 (commencing with Section 4600) of the Probate Code, by a person who has the capacity to make medical decisions, that allows a person with mental illness to protect their autonomy and ability to direct their own care by documenting their preferences for treatment in advance of a mental health crisis.
(q)Respondent means the person who is the subject of the petition for the CARE process.
(r)Stabilization medications means medications included in the CARE plan that primarily consist of antipsychotic medications to reduce symptoms of hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized thinking. Stabilization medications may be administered as long-acting injections if clinically indicated. Stabilization medications shall not be forcibly administered.
(s)Supporter means an adult designated by the respondent who assists the person who is the subject of the petition, which assistance may include supporting the person to understand, make, communicate, implement, or act on their own life decisions during the CARE process, including a CARE agreement, a CARE plan, and developing a graduation plan. A supporter shall not act independently.
SEC. 3.Section 5972 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5972.An individual shall qualify for the CARE process only if all of the following criteria are met:
(a)The person is 18 years of age or older.
(b)The person is currently experiencing a serious mental disorder, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 5600.3 and has a diagnosis identified in the disorder class: schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, or bipolar I disorder with psychotic features, except psychosis related to current intoxication, as defined in the most current version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. This section does not establish respondent eligibility based upon a psychotic disorder that is due to a medical condition or is not primarily psychiatric in nature, including, but not limited to, physical health conditions such as traumatic brain injury, autism, dementia, or neurologic conditions. A person who has a current diagnosis of substance use disorder as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 1374.72 of the Health and Safety Code but who does not also meet the required criteria in this section shall not qualify for the CARE process.
(c)The person is not clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment.
(d)At least one of the following is true:
(1)The person is unlikely to survive safely in the community without supervision and the persons condition is substantially deteriorating.
(2)The person is in need of services and supports in order to prevent a relapse or deterioration that would be likely to result in grave disability or serious harm to the person or others, as used in Section 5150.
(e)Participation in a CARE plan or CARE agreement would be the least restrictive alternative necessary to ensure the persons recovery and stability.
(f)It is likely that the person will benefit from participation in a CARE plan or CARE agreement.
SEC. 4.Section 5975 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5975.The Judicial Council shall develop a mandatory form for use to file a CARE process petition with the court and any other forms necessary for the CARE process. The petition shall be signed under the penalty of perjury and contain all of the following:
(a)The name of the respondent and, if known, the respondents address.
(b)The petitioners relationship to the respondent.
(c)Facts that support the petitioners assertion that the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972.
(d)Either of the following:
(1)An affidavit of a licensed behavioral health professional, including, for purposes of this section only, nurse practitioners as defined in Section 2835 of the Business and Professions Code and physician assistants as defined in subdivision (d) of Section 3501 of the Business and Professions Code, stating that the licensed behavioral health professional or their designee has examined the respondent within 60 days of the submission of the petition, or has made multiple attempts to examine, but has not been successful in eliciting the cooperation of the respondent to submit to an examination, within 60 days of the petition, and that the licensed behavioral health professional had determined that the respondent meets, or has reason to believe, explained with specificity in the affidavit, that the respondent meets the diagnostic criteria for CARE proceedings.
(2)Evidence that the respondent was detained for a minimum of two intensive treatments pursuant to Article 4 (commencing with Section 5250) of Chapter 2 of Part 1, the most recent one within the previous 60 days. Evidence may include, but is not limited to, documentary evidence from the facility where the respondent was detained, or a signed declaration from the petitioner if the petitioner had personal knowledge of the detentions.
SEC. 5.Section 5977 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5977.(a)(1)The court shall promptly review the petition to determine if the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972. The court may make a prima facie determination without conducting a hearing.
(2)If the court finds that the petitioner has not made a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, the court may dismiss the case and, if the court does so, it shall order that the dismissal is without prejudice, unless Section 5975.1 applies. Nothing other than Section 5975.1 prevents a petitioner whose petition was dismissed without prejudice from refiling the petition with amended information.
(3)If the court finds that the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, the court shall do one of the following:
(A)If the petitioner is the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the court shall do the following:
(i)Set the matter for an initial appearance on the petition within 14 court days.
(ii)Appoint a qualified legal services project, as defined in Sections 6213 to 6214.5, inclusive, of the Business and Professions Code, to represent the respondent. If no legal services project has agreed to accept these appointments, a public defender or other counsel working in that capacity shall be appointed to represent the respondent.
(iii)Determine whether the petition includes all of the following information and, if it does not, order the county behavioral health agency to submit a written report with the court within 14 court days that includes all of the following:
(I)A determination as to whether the respondent meets, or is likely to meet, the criteria for the CARE process.
(II)The outcome of efforts made to voluntarily engage the respondent prior to the filing of the petition.
(III)Conclusions and recommendations about the respondents ability to voluntarily engage in services.
(iv)Order the county behavioral health agency to provide notice to the respondent, the appointed counsel, and the county behavioral health agency in the county where the respondent resides, if different from the county where the CARE process has commenced.
(B)If the petitioner is a person other than the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the court shall order a county agency, or their designee, as determined by the court, to investigate, as necessary, file a written report with the court as soon as practicable, but within 30 court days, and provide notice to the respondent and petitioner that a report has been ordered. Parties shall complete the investigation with appropriate urgency. The written report shall include all of the following:
(i)A determination as to whether the respondent meets, or is likely to meet, the criteria for the CARE process.
(ii)The outcome of efforts made to voluntarily engage the respondent during the report period.
(iii)Conclusions and recommendations about the respondents ability to voluntarily engage in services.
(iv)The information, including protected health information, necessary to support the determinations, conclusions, and recommendations in the report.
(4)If, upon a request by the county agency ordered to investigate and file a report under subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3), the court finds that the county agency is making progress to engage the respondent, the court may, in its discretion, grant the county agency no more than 30 additional days to continue to work with, engage, and enroll the individual in voluntary treatment and services. The county agency shall provide notice to the respondent and petitioner that an extension for filing a report has been granted.
(5)Upon receipt of the report described in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3), the court shall, within five days, take one of the following actions:
(A)If the court determines that voluntary engagement with the respondent is effective, and that the individual has enrolled or is likely to enroll in voluntary behavioral health treatment, the court shall dismiss the matter.
(B)If the court determines, based on the county agencys report, that the evidence does not support a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, the court shall dismiss the matter. This section shall not prevent a county behavioral health agency from continuing to voluntarily engage with a person not described in Section 5972 but who is in need of services and supports.
(C)If the court determines, based on the county agencys report, that the evidence does support a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, and engagement with the county agency was not effective, the court shall do all of the following:
(i)Set an initial appearance on the petition within 14 court days.
(ii)Appoint a qualified legal services project, as defined in Sections 6213 to 6214.5, inclusive, of the Business and Professions Code or, if no legal services project has agreed to accept these appointments, a public defender or other counsel working in that capacity to represent the respondent.
(iii)Order the county agency to provide notice of the initial appearance to the petitioner, the respondent, the appointed counsel, the county behavioral health agency in the county where the respondent resides, and, if different, the county where the CARE court proceedings have commenced.
(b)At the initial appearance on the petition, all of the following shall apply:
(1)The court shall permit the respondent to substitute their own counsel.
(2)Petitioner shall be present. If the petitioner is not present, the matter may be dismissed.
(3)Respondent may waive personal appearance and appear through counsel. If the respondent does not waive personal appearance and does not appear at the hearing, and the court makes a finding in open court that reasonable attempts to elicit the attendance of the respondent have failed, the court may conduct the hearing in the respondents absence if the court makes a finding in open court that conducting the hearing without the participation or presence of the respondent would be in the respondents best interest.
(4)A representative from the county behavioral health agency shall be present.
(5)If the respondent asserts that they are enrolled in a federally recognized Indian tribe or are receiving services from an Indian health care provider, a tribal court, or a tribal organization, a representative from the program, the tribe, or the tribal court shall be allowed to be present, subject to the consent of the respondent. The tribal representative shall be entitled to notice by the county of the initial appearance.
(6)(A)If the petitioner is a person other than the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the court shall issue an order relieving the original petitioner and appointing the director of the county behavioral health agency or their designee as the successor petitioner.
(B)If the original petitioner is described in subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 5974, all of the following apply:
(i)The original petitioner shall have the right to be present and make a statement at the initial hearing on the merits of the petition held pursuant to paragraph (7).
(ii)(I)Until July 1, 2025, the court may, in its discretion, assign ongoing rights of notice to the original petitioner.
(II)Commencing July 1, 2025, unless the court determines, either upon its own motion or upon the motion of the respondent, at any point in the proceedings, that it likely would be detrimental to the treatment or well-being of the respondent, the court shall provide ongoing notice of proceedings to the original petitioner throughout the CARE proceedings, including notice of when a continuance is granted or when a case is dismissed. If a continuance is granted, the notice shall provide a general reason for the continuance, including the absence of the respondent or one of the grounds pursuant to Rule 3.1332 of the California Rules of Court. If a case is dismissed, the notice shall specify the statutory basis for the dismissal. A notice pursuant to this clause shall not disclose any patient information that is protected under the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-191), the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (Part 2.6 (commencing with Section 56) of Division 1 of the Civil Code), or this act, without the respondents consent.
(iii)To the extent that the respondent consents, the court may allow the original petitioner to participate in the respondents CARE proceedings.
(iv)The original petitioner may file a new petition with the court, pursuant to Section 5974, if the matter is dismissed and there is a change in circumstances.
(C)If the original petitioner is not described in subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 5974, the court shall not assign ongoing rights to the original petitioner, other than the right to be present and make a statement at the hearing on the merits of the petition held pursuant to paragraph (7).
(7)(A)The court shall set a hearing on the merits of the petition within 10 days, at which time the court shall determine whether, by clear and convincing evidence, the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972. In making this determination, the court shall consider all evidence properly before it, including any report from the county behavioral health agency ordered pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) and any additional admissible evidence presented by the parties, including the petition submitted and any statement given by the original petitioner. A licensed behavioral health professional may testify as an expert concerning whether the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972 provided that the court finds that the professional has special knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education sufficient to qualify as an expert under Section 720 of the Evidence Code.
(B)The hearing on the merits of the petition may be conducted concurrently with the initial appearance upon stipulation of the successor petitioner and the respondent, subject to the approval by the court.
(c)(1)If, at the hearing on the merits of the petition, the court finds there is not clear and convincing evidence that the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972, the court shall dismiss the case without prejudice, unless the court makes a finding, in open court, that the original petitioners filing was not in good faith, in which case the dismissal shall be with prejudice.
(2)If, at the hearing on the merits of the petition, the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency to work with the respondent, the respondents counsel, and the supporter to engage the respondent in behavioral health treatment and attempt to enter into a CARE agreement. The court shall set a case management hearing within 14 days.
(3)If the respondent is enrolled in a federally recognized Indian tribe, the county shall provide notice of the case management hearing to the tribe, subject to the consent of the respondent.
(d)The following shall apply to any written report submitted by a county behavioral health agency to the court pursuant to this section:
(1)The report is confidential and not subject to disclosure or inspection under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(2)The report is inadmissible in any subsequent legal proceeding, except upon motion of the respondent in that subsequent legal proceeding.
(3)The report shall be confidential pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 5976.5.
(4)This subdivision shall not affect the applicability of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 5977.1, make admissible any evidence that is not otherwise admissible, or permit a witness to base an opinion on any matter that is not a proper basis for such an opinion. The admission or exclusion of evidence shall be pursuant to the rules of evidence established by the Evidence Code, including, but not limited to, Section 352 of the Evidence Code, and by judicial decision.
SEC. 6.Section 5977.1 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5977.1.(a)(1)At the case management hearing, the court shall hear evidence as to whether the parties have entered, or are likely to enter, into a CARE agreement.
(2)If the court finds that the parties have entered, or are likely to enter, into a CARE agreement, the court shall do one of the following:
(A)Approve the terms of the CARE agreement or modify the terms of the CARE agreement and approve the agreement as modified by the court, and continue the matter and set a progress hearing for 60 days.
(B)Continue the matter for 14 days to allow the parties additional time to enter into a CARE agreement, upon stipulation of the parties.
(3)Nothing in this subdivision shall prohibit the parties from agreeing to, and the court from approving, amendments to the CARE agreement.
(4)The court may, in its discretion, call additional progress hearings beyond the hearing set at 60 days, for the duration of the CARE agreement.
(b)If the court finds that the parties have not entered into a CARE agreement, and are not likely to enter into a CARE agreement, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency, through a licensed behavioral health professional, to conduct a clinical evaluation of the respondent, unless there is an existing clinical evaluation of the respondent completed within the last 30 days and the parties stipulate to the use of that evaluation. The evaluation shall address, at a minimum, the following:
(1)A clinical diagnosis of the respondent.
(2)Whether the respondent has the legal capacity to give informed consent regarding psychotropic medication.
(3)Any other information as ordered by the court or that the licensed behavioral health professional conducting the evaluation determines would help the court make future informed decisions about the appropriate care and services the respondent should receive.
(4)An analysis of recommended services, programs, housing, medications, and interventions that support the recovery and stability of the respondent.
(c)(1)The court shall set a clinical evaluation hearing to review the evaluation within 21 days. The court shall order the county to file the evaluation with the court and provide the evaluation to the respondents counsel no later than five days prior to the scheduled clinical evaluation hearing. The clinical evaluation hearing may be continued for a maximum of 14 days upon stipulation of the respondent and the county behavioral health agency, unless there is good cause for a longer extension.
(2)At the clinical evaluation review hearing, the court shall review the evaluation and other evidence from the county behavioral health agency and the respondent. The county behavioral health agency and the respondent may present evidence and call witnesses, including the person who conducted the evaluation. Only relevant and admissible evidence that fully complies with the rules of evidence may be considered by the court.
(3)At the conclusion of the hearing, the court shall determine whether the respondent, by clear and convincing evidence, meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972 and make orders as follows:
(A)If the court finds that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency, the respondent, and the respondents counsel and supporter to jointly develop a CARE plan within 14 days.
(B)If the court does not find that clear and convincing evidence establishes that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, the court shall dismiss the petition.
(4)If the respondent is a self-identified American Indian or Alaska Native individual, as defined in Sections 1603(13), 1603(28), and 1679(a) of Title 25 of the United States Code, has been determined eligible as an Indian under Section 136.12 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, or is currently receiving services from an Indian health care provider or tribal court, the county behavioral health agency shall use its best efforts to meaningfully consult with and incorporate the Indian health care provider or tribal court available to the respondent to develop the CARE plan.
(5)The evaluation and all reports, documents, and filings submitted to the court shall be confidential.
(6)The date for the hearing to review and consider approval of the proposed CARE plan shall be set not more than 14 days from the date of the order to develop a CARE plan, unless the court finds good cause for an extension. The party requesting an extension of time for the CARE plan review hearing shall provide notice to the opposing party and their counsel of the request for extension of time, and the courts order if the request is granted.
(d)(1)At the CARE plan review hearing, the parties shall present their plan or plans to the court. The county behavioral health agency or the respondent, or both, may present a proposed CARE plan.
(2)After consideration of the plans proposed by the parties, the court shall adopt the elements of a CARE plan that support the recovery and stability of the respondent. The court may issue any orders necessary to support the respondent in accessing appropriate services and supports, including prioritization for those services and supports, subject to applicable laws and available funding pursuant to Section 5982. These orders shall constitute the CARE plan and may be amended.
(3)A court may order medication if it finds, upon review of the court-ordered evaluation and hearing from the parties, that, by clear and convincing evidence, the respondent lacks the capacity to give informed consent to the administration of medically necessary stabilization medication. To the extent the court orders medically necessary stabilization medication, the medication shall not be forcibly administered and the respondents failure to comply with a medication order shall not result in a penalty, including, but not limited to, contempt or termination of the CARE plan pursuant to Section 5979.
(4)If the proposed CARE plan includes services and supports, such as housing, provided directly or indirectly through another local governmental entity, that local entity may agree to provide the service or support, or the court may consider a motion by either of the parties to add the local entity as a party to the CARE proceeding. If the local entity agrees to provide the service or support, it may request to be added as a party by the court.
(5)If, after presentation of the CARE plan or plans, the court determines that additional information is needed, including from a licensed behavioral health professional, the court shall order a supplemental report to be filed by the county behavioral health agency for which the court may grant a continuance of no more than 14 days, unless there is good cause for a longer extension.
(6)If there is no CARE plan because the parties have not had sufficient time to complete it, the court may grant a continuance of no more than 14 days, unless there is good cause for a longer extension.
(7)This subdivision does not prohibit the parties from agreeing to, and the court from approving, amendments to the CARE plan. The court may also approve amendments to the CARE plan upon the finding that those amendments are necessary to support the respondent in accessing appropriate services and supports, following a hearing on the issue.
(e)The issuance of an order approving a CARE plan pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) begins the CARE process timeline, which shall not exceed one year.
SEC. 7.Section 5977.3 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5977.3.(a)(1)In the 11th month of the process timeline, the court shall hold a one-year status hearing. Not fewer than five court days prior to the one-year status hearing, the county behavioral health agency shall file a report with the court and shall serve the report on the respondent and the respondents counsel and supporter. The report shall include the following information:
(A)The progress that the respondent has made on the CARE plan, including a final assessment of the respondents stability.
(B)What services and supports in the CARE plan were provided, and what services and supports were not provided, over the life of the program.
(C)Any issues the respondent expressed or exhibited in adhering to the CARE plan.
(D)Recommendations for next steps, including what ongoing and additional services would benefit the respondent that the county behavioral health agency can facilitate or provide.
(2)At an evidentiary hearing, the respondent shall be permitted to respond to the report submitted by the county behavioral health agency and to the county behavioral health agencys testimony. The respondent shall be permitted to introduce their own information and recommendations. The respondent shall have the right at the hearing to call witnesses and to present evidence as to whether the respondent agrees with the report. The respondent may request either to be graduated from the program or to remain in the program.
(3)The court shall issue an order as follows:
(A)If the respondent requests to be graduated from the program, and the respondent has successfully completed the CARE process, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency and the respondent to work jointly on a voluntary graduation plan and the court shall schedule a hearing in the 12th month after adoption of the CARE plan for presentation of the graduation plan. The court shall review the graduation plan and recite the terms in open court. The graduation plan shall not place additional requirements on local governmental entities and is not enforceable by the court, except that the graduation plan may, at the respondents election, include a psychiatric advance directive, which shall have the force of law. Upon completion of the hearing, the respondent shall be officially graduated from the program.
(B)If the respondent requests to remain in the CARE process, the respondent may request any amount of time, up to and including one additional year. The court may approve the request and thereby permit the ongoing voluntary participation of the respondent if the court finds both of the following:
(i)The respondent did not successfully complete the CARE plan.
(ii)The respondent would benefit from continuation of the CARE plan.
(C)The court shall issue an order permitting the respondent to continue in the CARE plan or denying the respondents request to remain in the CARE plan, and state its reasons in open court.
(b)The respondent may be involuntarily reappointed to the program only if the court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that all of the following conditions apply:
(1)The respondent did not successfully complete the CARE process.
(2)All services and supports required through the CARE process were provided to the respondent.
(3)The respondent would benefit from continuation in the CARE process.
(4)The respondent currently meets the requirements in Section 5972.
(c)A respondent may only be reappointed to the CARE process once, for up to one additional year.
SEC. 8.Section 5978 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5978.(a)A court may refer an individual from assisted outpatient treatment, from conservatorship proceedings pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 5350) of Part 1 of Division 5 (LPS conservatorship), from misdemeanor proceedings pursuant to Section 1370.01 of the Penal Code, or from felony proceedings pursuant to Section 1370 of the Penal Code to the CARE Act court.
(b) The CARE Act court may consider a referral made pursuant to this section to be a petition satisfying the requirements of paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 5977 if both of the following conditions are met:
(1)The referral contains all of the information required to be included in a CARE process petition pursuant to Section 5975.
(2)The information included in the referral makes a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972.
(c)If the CARE Act court elects to consider a referral to be a petition pursuant to subdivision (b), the CARE Act court shall notify the referring court that the referral has been accepted as a petition for CARE Act proceedings.
(d)If the CARE Act court does not elect to consider a referral to be a petition pursuant to subdivision (b), the CARE Act court shall order the appropriate petitioner candidate to do the following within 14 court days:
(1)Complete an investigation to determine whether to file a petition on behalf of the referred individual.
(2)Notify the referring court whether it intends to file a CARE Act petition on behalf of the referred individual.
(e)If the appropriate petitioner candidate notifies the CARE Act court that it requires additional time to complete its investigation pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the CARE Act court may grant an extension of up to 30 court days.
(f)For purposes of this section, appropriate petitioner candidate means:
(1)For referrals from assisted outpatient treatment or from misdemeanor or felony proceedings, the county behavioral health director or their designee.
(2)For referrals from conservatorship proceedings, the conservator or proposed conservator.
SEC. 9.Section 5985 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5985.(a)(1)The department shall develop, in consultation with county behavioral health agencies, other relevant state or local government entities, disability rights groups, individuals with lived experience, families, counsel, racial justice experts, and other appropriate stakeholders, an annual CARE Act report. The department shall post the annual report on its internet website.
(2)The department, in consultation with county behavioral health agencies and courts, shall specify the length of time that data on former participants shall be reported pursuant to subdivision (e), which shall be a minimum of 12 months after completion of and a maximum of 36 months following engagement in CARE Act elective services, a CARE agreement, or CARE plan.
(3)For the purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(A)Former participant means an individual who enters into CARE Act elective services, a CARE agreement, or a CARE plan, but who has either graduated from CARE, or for whom CARE Act proceedings were dismissed or terminated. Counties shall not be responsible for reporting on any individual who is privately insured or who no longer resides in California.
(B)Active participants means an individual who is an elective client, or who has a CARE plan or CARE agreement.
(b)County behavioral health agencies and any other state or local governmental entity, as identified by the department, shall provide data related to the CARE Act participants, services, and supports to the department. The department shall determine the data measures and specifications, and shall publish them via guidance issues pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 5984.
(c)Each county behavioral health department and any other state and local governmental entity, as identified by the department, shall provide the required data to the department, in a format and frequency as directed by the department.
(d)(1)In consultation with the Judicial Council, the department shall develop an annual reporting schedule for the submission of CARE Act data from the trial courts.
(2)Data from the trial courts shall be submitted to the Judicial Council, which shall aggregate the data and submit it to the department consistent with the reporting schedule developed pursuant to paragraph (1).
(3)On an annual basis to be determined by the Judicial Council and consistent with the annual reporting schedule developed pursuant to paragraph (1), the trial courts shall report to the Judicial Council the following data related to CARE Act petitions:
(A)The number of petitions submitted pursuant to Section 5975.
(B)The number of initial appearance hearings on the petition held pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 5977.
(C)The total number of hearings held pursuant to this part.
(D)The total number of CARE plans ordered and CARE agreements approved.
(E)The total number of court petitions dismissed, as reported by the Judicial Council.
(e)The annual report shall include process measures to examine the scope of impact and monitor the performance of CARE Act model implementation. The measures and reporting requirements shall be developed by the department in consultation with county behavioral health agencies. The report shall include trial court petition data pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (d) and, to the extent administrative data is available, all of the following information compiled from county behavioral health departments and courts:
(1)The demographics of all participants, including, but not limited to, the age, sex, race, ethnicity, disability, languages spoken, sexual orientation, gender identity, housing status, veteran status, immigration status, health coverage status, including Medi-Cal enrollment status, information related to CARE criteria outlined in Section 5972, and county of residence.
(2)The petitioners relationship to the CARE Act respondent as defined in Section 5974.
(3)The services and supports ordered, the services and supports provided, and the services and supports ordered but not provided to all active and former participants.
(4)The housing placements of all active and former participants. Placements include, but are not limited to, transition to a higher level of care, independent living in the persons own house or apartment, community-based housing, community-based housing with services, shelter, and no housing.
(5)Treatments continued and terminated of all active and former participants.
(6)Substance use disorder rates and rates of treatment among all active and former participants.
(7)Detentions and other Lanterman-Petris-Short Act involvement for all active and former participants.
(8)Criminal justice involvement of all active and former participants.
(9)Deaths among all active and former participants, along with the cause of death.
(10)Type, format, and frequency of outreach and engagement activities provided by a county behavioral health agency to engage an individual who is the subject of a referral or petition, including interactions about the individuals eligible or likely to be eligible and outcomes of these efforts.
(11)In consultation with the department and county behavioral health departments, the number, rates, and trends of contacts made to the county behavioral health agency about individuals eligible or likely to be eligible for the CARE process, including outcomes of those contacts.
(12)The number, rates, and source of referrals to county behavioral health departments, including, but not limited to, referrals resulting in a petition or reason for not filing a petition, length of time from referral to outcome, and services provided for those engaged voluntarily without a petition.
(13)The number, rates, and trends of petitions resulting in dismissal and hearings.
(14)Information on petition dispositions, including, but not limited to, disposition recommendations and the number of days from petition to disposition.
(15)The number, rates, and trends of supporters.
(16)The number, rates, and trends of approved CARE agreements.
(17)The number, rates, and trends of ordered and completed CARE plans.
(18)Statistics on the services and supports, including court orders for stabilizing medications.
(19)The rates of adherence to medication.
(20)The number, rates, and trends of psychiatric advance directives created for active participants.
(21)The number, rates, and trends of developed graduation plans.
(22)Outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of the CARE Act model, such as improvement in housing status, including gaining and maintaining housing, reductions in emergency department visits and inpatient hospitalizations, reductions in law enforcement encounters and incarceration, reductions in involuntary treatment and conservatorship, and reductions in substance use.
(23)A health equity assessment of the CARE Act to identify demographic disparities based on demographic data in paragraph (1), and to inform disparity reduction efforts.
(24)Data regarding referrals made pursuant to Section 5978.1, as part of the CARE Act.
(f)(1)The report shall include, at a minimum, information on the effectiveness of the CARE Act model in improving outcomes and reducing disparities, homelessness, criminal justice involvement, conservatorships, and hospitalization of participants. The annual report shall include process measures to examine the scope of impact and monitor the performance of CARE Act model implementation, such as the number and source of petitions filed for CARE Court; the number, rates, and trends of petitions resulting in dismissal and hearings; the number, rates, and trends of supporters; the number, rates, and trends of voluntary CARE agreements; the number, rates, and trends of ordered and completed CARE plans; the services and supports included in CARE plans, including court orders for stabilizing medications; the rates of adherence to medication; the number, rates, and trends of psychiatric advance directives; and the number, rates, and trends of developed graduation plans. The report shall include outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of the CARE Act model, such as improvement in housing status, including gaining and maintaining housing; reductions in emergency department visits and inpatient hospitalizations; reductions in law enforcement encounters and incarceration; reductions in involuntary treatment and conservatorship; and reductions in substance use. The annual report shall examine these data through the lens of health equity to identify racial, ethnic, and other demographic disparities and inform disparity reduction efforts.
(2)Data shall be stratified by age, sex, race, ethnicity, languages spoken, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, housing status, veteran status, immigration status, health coverage source, and county, to the extent statistically relevant data is available.
(g)The outcomes shall be presented to relevant state oversight bodies, including, but not limited to, the California Interagency Council on Homelessness.
(h)(1)Beginning in 2026, the department shall include in its annual CARE Act report quantitative, deidentified information concerning the operation of this part.
(2)Based on information provided to the department in a form and manner specified by the department, in consultation with the Judicial Council and county behavioral health departments, in accordance with subdivision (b) of Section 5984, the report shall include all of the following information, aggregated by county, compiled from county behavioral health departments, courts, and the department, depending on the source:
(A)The number of contacts to the county behavioral health department about individuals eligible or likely to be eligible for the CARE process, including outcome of contacts.
(B)The number of CARE petitions filed with the superior court.
(C)The petitioner type for each petition filed with the superior court.
(D)Disposition of each petition filed with the superior court.
(E)The number of days between filing each petition and the petitions disposition.
(F)Demographic information of each CARE Act participant or potentially eligible CARE Act participant, including, but not limited to, age, sex, race, ethnicity, disability, languages spoken, sexual orientation, gender identity, housing status, veteran status, immigration status, health coverage status, including Medi-Cal enrollment status, information related to CARE criteria outlined in Section 5972, and county of residence, to the extent administrative data is available and statistically relevant.
(G)The number of referrals of individuals in conservatorship proceedings made pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 5978, including the disposition of each referral.
(H)The number of referrals made pursuant to Section 5978.1, including the disposition of each referral.
(i)Information publicly released or published pursuant to this part shall not contain data that may lead to the identification of participants or petitioners or information that would otherwise allow an individual to link the published information to a specific person. Data published by the department shall be deidentified in compliance with Section 164.514(a) and (b) of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
SEC. 10.If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(a)If the defendant is found mentally competent, the criminal process shall resume, and the trial on the offense charged or hearing on the alleged violation shall proceed.
(b)If the defendant is found mentally incompetent, the trial, judgment, or hearing on the alleged violation shall be suspended and the court shall, after notice to the defendant, defense counsel, and the prosecution, hold a hearing to determine whether to do one or more of the following:
(1)(A)(i)Conduct a hearing, pursuant to Chapter 2.8A (commencing with Section 1001.35) of Title 6, and, if the court deems the defendant eligible and suitable, grant diversion pursuant to Section 1001.36 for a period not to exceed one year from the date the individual is accepted into diversion or the maximum term of imprisonment provided by law for the most serious offense charged in the misdemeanor complaint, whichever is shorter.
(ii)Notwithstanding any other law, including Section 23640 of the Vehicle Code, a misdemeanor offense for which a defendant may be placed in a mental health diversion program in accordance with this section includes a misdemeanor violation of Section 23152 or 23153 of the Vehicle Code. However, this section does not limit the authority of the Department of Motor Vehicles to take administrative action concerning the driving privileges of a person arrested for a violation of Section 23152 or 23153 of the Vehicle Code.
(B)Any hearing to determine eligibility and suitability for diversion shall be held no later than 30 days after the finding of incompetence. If the hearing is delayed beyond 30 days, the court shall order the defendant to be released on their own recognizance pending the hearing.
(C)If the defendant performs satisfactorily on diversion pursuant to this section, at the end of the period of diversion, the court shall dismiss the criminal charges that were the subject of the criminal proceedings at the time of the initial diversion.
(2)Refer the defendant to the CARE Act court pursuant to Section 5978 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, if the defendant or counsel for the defendant agrees to the referral and the court has reason to believe that the defendant may be eligible for the CARE program. The CARE Act court shall hold a hearing to determine eligibility for the CARE program within 30 court days after the date of the referral. If the hearing is delayed beyond 30 court days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in a county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing. If the defendant is accepted into the CARE program, the CARE Act court shall notify the criminal court of the acceptance, and the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 six months after the date of the referral to the CARE program, unless the defendants case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that six-month time period. If the defendant is not accepted into the CARE program or if the CARE Act court refers the defendant back to criminal court before the expiration of the six-month time period, the court shall proceed as provided in paragraph (1). Except as provided in this section and Sections 5978 and 5978.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, this paragraph does not alter the confidential nature of CARE program proceedings.
(c)If the court finds the defendant ineligible or unsuitable for diversion based on the circumstances set forth in subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (g) of Section 1001.36, the court shall, after notice to the defendant, defense counsel, and the prosecution, hold a hearing to determine which one of the following actions the court will take:
(1)Order modification of an existing mental health diversion treatment plan in accordance with a recommendation from the treatment provider.
(2)Refer the defendant to assisted outpatient treatment pursuant to Section 5346 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. A referral to assisted outpatient treatment may only occur in a county where services are available pursuant to Section 5348 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, and the agency agrees to accept responsibility for treatment of the defendant. A hearing to determine eligibility for assisted outpatient treatment shall be held within 45 days after the finding of incompetency. If the hearing is delayed beyond 45 days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing. If the defendant is accepted into assisted outpatient treatment, the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 six months after the date of the referral to assisted outpatient treatment, unless the defendants case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that time period. This section does not alter the confidential nature of assisted outpatient treatment.
(3)Refer the defendant to the county conservatorship investigator in the county of commitment for possible conservatorship proceedings for the defendant pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 5350) of Part 1 of Division 5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. A defendant shall only be referred to the conservatorship investigator if, based on the opinion of a qualified mental health expert, the defendant appears to be gravely disabled, as defined in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (h) of Section 5008 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. Any hearings required in the conservatorship proceedings shall be held in the superior court in the county of commitment. The court shall transmit a copy of the order directing initiation of conservatorship proceedings to the county mental health director or the directors designee and shall notify the county mental health director or their designee of the outcome of the proceedings. Before establishing a conservatorship, the public guardian shall investigate all available alternatives to conservatorship pursuant to Section 5354 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. If a petition is not filed within 30 days of the referral, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending conservatorship proceedings. If the outcome of the conservatorship proceedings results in the filing of a petition for the establishment of a temporary or permanent conservatorship, the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 90 days after the date of the filing of the petition, unless the defendants case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that time period. This section does not alter the confidential nature of conservatorship proceedings.
(4)Refer the defendant to the CARE Act court pursuant to Section 5978 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. The CARE Act court shall hold a hearing to determine eligibility for the CARE program within 14 court days after the date that the petition is filed. If the hearing is delayed beyond 14 court days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in a county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing. If the defendant is accepted into the CARE program, the CARE Act court shall notify the criminal court of the acceptance, and the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 six months after the date of the referral to the CARE program, unless the defendants case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that time period. Except as provided in this section and Sections 5978 and 5978.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, this paragraph does not alter the confidential nature of CARE program proceedings.
(5)If the defendant does not qualify for services pursuant to paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive, dismiss the charges.
(d)It is the intent of the Legislature that a defendant subject to the terms of this section receive mental health treatment in a treatment facility and not a jail. A term of four days will be deemed to have been served for every two days spent in actual custody against the maximum period of treatment pursuant to paragraphs (2) and (4) of subdivision (c) and paragraphs (1) and (2) of subdivision (b), if applicable. A defendant not in actual custody shall otherwise receive day for day credit against the term of treatment from the date the defendant is accepted into treatment in the event that the criminal charges have not previously been dismissed. Actual custody has the same meaning as in Section 4019.
(e)The county behavioral health agency and jail medical providers may share confidential medical records and other relevant information with the court, including, but not limited to, prior interactions with and treatment of the defendant, for the purpose of determining likelihood of eligibility for behavioral health services and programs pursuant to this section. The disclosure of information pursuant to this subdivision is subject to applicable state and federal privacy laws.
(f)This section shall apply only as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 1367.
(g)It is the intent of the Legislature that the court shall consider all treatment options as provided in this section prior to dismissing criminal charges. However, nothing in this section limits a courts discretion pursuant to Section 1385.
SEC. 2.Section 5971 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5971.Unless the context otherwise requires, the following definitions shall govern the construction of this part.
(a)CARE agreement means a voluntary settlement agreement entered into by the parties. A CARE agreement includes the same elements as a CARE plan to support the respondent in accessing community-based services and supports.
(b)CARE plan means an individualized, appropriate range of community-based services and supports, as set forth in this part, which include clinically appropriate behavioral health care and stabilization medications, housing, and other supportive services, as appropriate, pursuant to Section 5982.
(c)CARE process means the court and related proceedings to implement the CARE Act.
(d)Clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment means both of the following:
(1)The persons condition is stable and not deteriorating.
(2)The person is currently engaged in treatment and managing symptoms through medication or other therapeutic interventions. Enrollment in treatment alone shall not be considered clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment.
(e)Counsel means the attorney representing the respondent, appointed pursuant to Section 5977, or chosen by the respondent, in CARE Act proceedings and matters related to CARE agreements and CARE plans. Representation of a respondent in these matters does not alter counsels obligations under the State Bar Act and the Rules of Professional Conduct, including subdivision (e) of Section 6068 of the Business and Professions Code and rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.
(f)County behavioral health agency means the local director of mental health services described in Section 5607, the local behavioral health director, or both as applicable, or their designee.
(g)Court-ordered evaluation means an evaluation ordered by a superior court pursuant to Section 5977.1.
(h)Department means the State Department of Health Care Services.
(i)Graduation plan means a voluntary agreement entered into by the parties at the end of the CARE program that includes a strategy to support a successful transition out of court jurisdiction and that may include a psychiatric advance directive. A graduation plan includes the same elements as a CARE plan to support the respondent in accessing community-based services and supports. The graduation plan shall not place additional requirements on the local government entities and is not enforceable by the court.
(j)Homeless outreach worker means a person who engages people experiencing homelessness to assess for unmet needs, offer information, services, or other assistance, or provide care coordination.
(k)Indian health care provider means a health care program operated by the Indian Health Service, an Indian tribe, a tribal organization, or urban Indian organization (I/T/U) as those terms are defined in Section 4 of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1603).
(l)Legal proceeding means any administrative, civil, or criminal proceeding, including, but not limited to, juvenile court proceedings and family court proceedings and services, and any form of alternative dispute resolution, including arbitration and mediation, except for the following:
(1)A proceeding under this part.
(2)A proceeding under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act described in paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 5979.
(3)A proceeding from which the respondent was referred to CARE Act proceedings as described in Section 5978.
(4)A disciplinary proceeding under Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 6000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code.
(5)An appeal from any of the proceedings identified in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive.
(m)Licensed behavioral health professional means either of the following:
(1)A licensed mental health professional, as defined in subdivision (j) of Section 4096.
(2)A person who has been granted a waiver of licensure requirements by the department pursuant to Section 5751.2.
(n)Parties means the petitioner, the respondent, the county behavioral health agency in the county where proceedings under this part are pending, and any local governmental entity added by the court pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 5977.1.
(o)Petitioner means the person who files the CARE Act petition with the court. Additionally, if the petitioner is a person listed in Section 5974 other than the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the petitioner shall have the right to file a petition with the court, but at the initial hearing the court shall substitute the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, of the county in which the proceedings are filed as petitioner. The original petitioner may, at the courts discretion and in furtherance of the interests of the respondent, retain rights as described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (6) of subdivision (b) of Section 5977.
(p)Psychiatric advance directive means a legal document, executed on a voluntary basis in accordance with the requirements for advance health care directives in Division 4.7 (commencing with Section 4600) of the Probate Code, by a person who has the capacity to make medical decisions, that allows a person with mental illness to protect their autonomy and ability to direct their own care by documenting their preferences for treatment in advance of a mental health crisis.
(q)Respondent means the person who is the subject of the petition for the CARE process.
(r)Stabilization medications means medications included in the CARE plan that primarily consist of antipsychotic medications to reduce symptoms of hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized thinking. Stabilization medications may be administered as long-acting injections if clinically indicated. Stabilization medications shall not be forcibly administered.
(s)Supporter means an adult designated by the respondent who assists the person who is the subject of the petition, which assistance may include supporting the person to understand, make, communicate, implement, or act on their own life decisions during the CARE process, including a CARE agreement, a CARE plan, and developing a graduation plan. A supporter shall not act independently.
SEC. 3.Section 5972 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5972.An individual shall qualify for the CARE process only if all of the following criteria are met:
(a)The person is 18 years of age or older.
(b)The person is currently experiencing a serious mental disorder, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 5600.3 and has a diagnosis identified in the disorder class: schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, or bipolar I disorder with psychotic features, except psychosis related to current intoxication, as defined in the most current version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. This section does not establish respondent eligibility based upon a psychotic disorder that is due to a medical condition or is not primarily psychiatric in nature, including, but not limited to, physical health conditions such as traumatic brain injury, autism, dementia, or neurologic conditions. A person who has a current diagnosis of substance use disorder as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 1374.72 of the Health and Safety Code but who does not also meet the required criteria in this section shall not qualify for the CARE process.
(c)The person is not clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment.
(d)At least one of the following is true:
(1)The person is unlikely to survive safely in the community without supervision and the persons condition is substantially deteriorating.
(2)The person is in need of services and supports in order to prevent a relapse or deterioration that would be likely to result in grave disability or serious harm to the person or others, as used in Section 5150.
(e)Participation in a CARE plan or CARE agreement would be the least restrictive alternative necessary to ensure the persons recovery and stability.
(f)It is likely that the person will benefit from participation in a CARE plan or CARE agreement.
SEC. 4.Section 5975 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5975.The Judicial Council shall develop a mandatory form for use to file a CARE process petition with the court and any other forms necessary for the CARE process. The petition shall be signed under the penalty of perjury and contain all of the following:
(a)The name of the respondent and, if known, the respondents address.
(b)The petitioners relationship to the respondent.
(c)Facts that support the petitioners assertion that the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972.
(d)Either of the following:
(1)An affidavit of a licensed behavioral health professional, including, for purposes of this section only, nurse practitioners as defined in Section 2835 of the Business and Professions Code and physician assistants as defined in subdivision (d) of Section 3501 of the Business and Professions Code, stating that the licensed behavioral health professional or their designee has examined the respondent within 60 days of the submission of the petition, or has made multiple attempts to examine, but has not been successful in eliciting the cooperation of the respondent to submit to an examination, within 60 days of the petition, and that the licensed behavioral health professional had determined that the respondent meets, or has reason to believe, explained with specificity in the affidavit, that the respondent meets the diagnostic criteria for CARE proceedings.
(2)Evidence that the respondent was detained for a minimum of two intensive treatments pursuant to Article 4 (commencing with Section 5250) of Chapter 2 of Part 1, the most recent one within the previous 60 days. Evidence may include, but is not limited to, documentary evidence from the facility where the respondent was detained, or a signed declaration from the petitioner if the petitioner had personal knowledge of the detentions.
SEC. 5.Section 5977 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5977.(a)(1)The court shall promptly review the petition to determine if the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972. The court may make a prima facie determination without conducting a hearing.
(2)If the court finds that the petitioner has not made a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, the court may dismiss the case and, if the court does so, it shall order that the dismissal is without prejudice, unless Section 5975.1 applies. Nothing other than Section 5975.1 prevents a petitioner whose petition was dismissed without prejudice from refiling the petition with amended information.
(3)If the court finds that the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, the court shall do one of the following:
(A)If the petitioner is the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the court shall do the following:
(i)Set the matter for an initial appearance on the petition within 14 court days.
(ii)Appoint a qualified legal services project, as defined in Sections 6213 to 6214.5, inclusive, of the Business and Professions Code, to represent the respondent. If no legal services project has agreed to accept these appointments, a public defender or other counsel working in that capacity shall be appointed to represent the respondent.
(iii)Determine whether the petition includes all of the following information and, if it does not, order the county behavioral health agency to submit a written report with the court within 14 court days that includes all of the following:
(I)A determination as to whether the respondent meets, or is likely to meet, the criteria for the CARE process.
(II)The outcome of efforts made to voluntarily engage the respondent prior to the filing of the petition.
(III)Conclusions and recommendations about the respondents ability to voluntarily engage in services.
(iv)Order the county behavioral health agency to provide notice to the respondent, the appointed counsel, and the county behavioral health agency in the county where the respondent resides, if different from the county where the CARE process has commenced.
(B)If the petitioner is a person other than the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the court shall order a county agency, or their designee, as determined by the court, to investigate, as necessary, file a written report with the court as soon as practicable, but within 30 court days, and provide notice to the respondent and petitioner that a report has been ordered. Parties shall complete the investigation with appropriate urgency. The written report shall include all of the following:
(i)A determination as to whether the respondent meets, or is likely to meet, the criteria for the CARE process.
(ii)The outcome of efforts made to voluntarily engage the respondent during the report period.
(iii)Conclusions and recommendations about the respondents ability to voluntarily engage in services.
(iv)The information, including protected health information, necessary to support the determinations, conclusions, and recommendations in the report.
(4)If, upon a request by the county agency ordered to investigate and file a report under subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3), the court finds that the county agency is making progress to engage the respondent, the court may, in its discretion, grant the county agency no more than 30 additional days to continue to work with, engage, and enroll the individual in voluntary treatment and services. The county agency shall provide notice to the respondent and petitioner that an extension for filing a report has been granted.
(5)Upon receipt of the report described in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3), the court shall, within five days, take one of the following actions:
(A)If the court determines that voluntary engagement with the respondent is effective, and that the individual has enrolled or is likely to enroll in voluntary behavioral health treatment, the court shall dismiss the matter.
(B)If the court determines, based on the county agencys report, that the evidence does not support a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, the court shall dismiss the matter. This section shall not prevent a county behavioral health agency from continuing to voluntarily engage with a person not described in Section 5972 but who is in need of services and supports.
(C)If the court determines, based on the county agencys report, that the evidence does support a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, and engagement with the county agency was not effective, the court shall do all of the following:
(i)Set an initial appearance on the petition within 14 court days.
(ii)Appoint a qualified legal services project, as defined in Sections 6213 to 6214.5, inclusive, of the Business and Professions Code or, if no legal services project has agreed to accept these appointments, a public defender or other counsel working in that capacity to represent the respondent.
(iii)Order the county agency to provide notice of the initial appearance to the petitioner, the respondent, the appointed counsel, the county behavioral health agency in the county where the respondent resides, and, if different, the county where the CARE court proceedings have commenced.
(b)At the initial appearance on the petition, all of the following shall apply:
(1)The court shall permit the respondent to substitute their own counsel.
(2)Petitioner shall be present. If the petitioner is not present, the matter may be dismissed.
(3)Respondent may waive personal appearance and appear through counsel. If the respondent does not waive personal appearance and does not appear at the hearing, and the court makes a finding in open court that reasonable attempts to elicit the attendance of the respondent have failed, the court may conduct the hearing in the respondents absence if the court makes a finding in open court that conducting the hearing without the participation or presence of the respondent would be in the respondents best interest.
(4)A representative from the county behavioral health agency shall be present.
(5)If the respondent asserts that they are enrolled in a federally recognized Indian tribe or are receiving services from an Indian health care provider, a tribal court, or a tribal organization, a representative from the program, the tribe, or the tribal court shall be allowed to be present, subject to the consent of the respondent. The tribal representative shall be entitled to notice by the county of the initial appearance.
(6)(A)If the petitioner is a person other than the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the court shall issue an order relieving the original petitioner and appointing the director of the county behavioral health agency or their designee as the successor petitioner.
(B)If the original petitioner is described in subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 5974, all of the following apply:
(i)The original petitioner shall have the right to be present and make a statement at the initial hearing on the merits of the petition held pursuant to paragraph (7).
(ii)(I)Until July 1, 2025, the court may, in its discretion, assign ongoing rights of notice to the original petitioner.
(II)Commencing July 1, 2025, unless the court determines, either upon its own motion or upon the motion of the respondent, at any point in the proceedings, that it likely would be detrimental to the treatment or well-being of the respondent, the court shall provide ongoing notice of proceedings to the original petitioner throughout the CARE proceedings, including notice of when a continuance is granted or when a case is dismissed. If a continuance is granted, the notice shall provide a general reason for the continuance, including the absence of the respondent or one of the grounds pursuant to Rule 3.1332 of the California Rules of Court. If a case is dismissed, the notice shall specify the statutory basis for the dismissal. A notice pursuant to this clause shall not disclose any patient information that is protected under the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-191), the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (Part 2.6 (commencing with Section 56) of Division 1 of the Civil Code), or this act, without the respondents consent.
(iii)To the extent that the respondent consents, the court may allow the original petitioner to participate in the respondents CARE proceedings.
(iv)The original petitioner may file a new petition with the court, pursuant to Section 5974, if the matter is dismissed and there is a change in circumstances.
(C)If the original petitioner is not described in subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 5974, the court shall not assign ongoing rights to the original petitioner, other than the right to be present and make a statement at the hearing on the merits of the petition held pursuant to paragraph (7).
(7)(A)The court shall set a hearing on the merits of the petition within 10 days, at which time the court shall determine whether, by clear and convincing evidence, the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972. In making this determination, the court shall consider all evidence properly before it, including any report from the county behavioral health agency ordered pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) and any additional admissible evidence presented by the parties, including the petition submitted and any statement given by the original petitioner. A licensed behavioral health professional may testify as an expert concerning whether the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972 provided that the court finds that the professional has special knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education sufficient to qualify as an expert under Section 720 of the Evidence Code.
(B)The hearing on the merits of the petition may be conducted concurrently with the initial appearance upon stipulation of the successor petitioner and the respondent, subject to the approval by the court.
(c)(1)If, at the hearing on the merits of the petition, the court finds there is not clear and convincing evidence that the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972, the court shall dismiss the case without prejudice, unless the court makes a finding, in open court, that the original petitioners filing was not in good faith, in which case the dismissal shall be with prejudice.
(2)If, at the hearing on the merits of the petition, the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency to work with the respondent, the respondents counsel, and the supporter to engage the respondent in behavioral health treatment and attempt to enter into a CARE agreement. The court shall set a case management hearing within 14 days.
(3)If the respondent is enrolled in a federally recognized Indian tribe, the county shall provide notice of the case management hearing to the tribe, subject to the consent of the respondent.
(d)The following shall apply to any written report submitted by a county behavioral health agency to the court pursuant to this section:
(1)The report is confidential and not subject to disclosure or inspection under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(2)The report is inadmissible in any subsequent legal proceeding, except upon motion of the respondent in that subsequent legal proceeding.
(3)The report shall be confidential pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 5976.5.
(4)This subdivision shall not affect the applicability of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 5977.1, make admissible any evidence that is not otherwise admissible, or permit a witness to base an opinion on any matter that is not a proper basis for such an opinion. The admission or exclusion of evidence shall be pursuant to the rules of evidence established by the Evidence Code, including, but not limited to, Section 352 of the Evidence Code, and by judicial decision.
SEC. 6.Section 5977.1 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5977.1.(a)(1)At the case management hearing, the court shall hear evidence as to whether the parties have entered, or are likely to enter, into a CARE agreement.
(2)If the court finds that the parties have entered, or are likely to enter, into a CARE agreement, the court shall do one of the following:
(A)Approve the terms of the CARE agreement or modify the terms of the CARE agreement and approve the agreement as modified by the court, and continue the matter and set a progress hearing for 60 days.
(B)Continue the matter for 14 days to allow the parties additional time to enter into a CARE agreement, upon stipulation of the parties.
(3)Nothing in this subdivision shall prohibit the parties from agreeing to, and the court from approving, amendments to the CARE agreement.
(4)The court may, in its discretion, call additional progress hearings beyond the hearing set at 60 days, for the duration of the CARE agreement.
(b)If the court finds that the parties have not entered into a CARE agreement, and are not likely to enter into a CARE agreement, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency, through a licensed behavioral health professional, to conduct a clinical evaluation of the respondent, unless there is an existing clinical evaluation of the respondent completed within the last 30 days and the parties stipulate to the use of that evaluation. The evaluation shall address, at a minimum, the following:
(1)A clinical diagnosis of the respondent.
(2)Whether the respondent has the legal capacity to give informed consent regarding psychotropic medication.
(3)Any other information as ordered by the court or that the licensed behavioral health professional conducting the evaluation determines would help the court make future informed decisions about the appropriate care and services the respondent should receive.
(4)An analysis of recommended services, programs, housing, medications, and interventions that support the recovery and stability of the respondent.
(c)(1)The court shall set a clinical evaluation hearing to review the evaluation within 21 days. The court shall order the county to file the evaluation with the court and provide the evaluation to the respondents counsel no later than five days prior to the scheduled clinical evaluation hearing. The clinical evaluation hearing may be continued for a maximum of 14 days upon stipulation of the respondent and the county behavioral health agency, unless there is good cause for a longer extension.
(2)At the clinical evaluation review hearing, the court shall review the evaluation and other evidence from the county behavioral health agency and the respondent. The county behavioral health agency and the respondent may present evidence and call witnesses, including the person who conducted the evaluation. Only relevant and admissible evidence that fully complies with the rules of evidence may be considered by the court.
(3)At the conclusion of the hearing, the court shall determine whether the respondent, by clear and convincing evidence, meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972 and make orders as follows:
(A)If the court finds that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency, the respondent, and the respondents counsel and supporter to jointly develop a CARE plan within 14 days.
(B)If the court does not find that clear and convincing evidence establishes that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, the court shall dismiss the petition.
(4)If the respondent is a self-identified American Indian or Alaska Native individual, as defined in Sections 1603(13), 1603(28), and 1679(a) of Title 25 of the United States Code, has been determined eligible as an Indian under Section 136.12 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, or is currently receiving services from an Indian health care provider or tribal court, the county behavioral health agency shall use its best efforts to meaningfully consult with and incorporate the Indian health care provider or tribal court available to the respondent to develop the CARE plan.
(5)The evaluation and all reports, documents, and filings submitted to the court shall be confidential.
(6)The date for the hearing to review and consider approval of the proposed CARE plan shall be set not more than 14 days from the date of the order to develop a CARE plan, unless the court finds good cause for an extension. The party requesting an extension of time for the CARE plan review hearing shall provide notice to the opposing party and their counsel of the request for extension of time, and the courts order if the request is granted.
(d)(1)At the CARE plan review hearing, the parties shall present their plan or plans to the court. The county behavioral health agency or the respondent, or both, may present a proposed CARE plan.
(2)After consideration of the plans proposed by the parties, the court shall adopt the elements of a CARE plan that support the recovery and stability of the respondent. The court may issue any orders necessary to support the respondent in accessing appropriate services and supports, including prioritization for those services and supports, subject to applicable laws and available funding pursuant to Section 5982. These orders shall constitute the CARE plan and may be amended.
(3)A court may order medication if it finds, upon review of the court-ordered evaluation and hearing from the parties, that, by clear and convincing evidence, the respondent lacks the capacity to give informed consent to the administration of medically necessary stabilization medication. To the extent the court orders medically necessary stabilization medication, the medication shall not be forcibly administered and the respondents failure to comply with a medication order shall not result in a penalty, including, but not limited to, contempt or termination of the CARE plan pursuant to Section 5979.
(4)If the proposed CARE plan includes services and supports, such as housing, provided directly or indirectly through another local governmental entity, that local entity may agree to provide the service or support, or the court may consider a motion by either of the parties to add the local entity as a party to the CARE proceeding. If the local entity agrees to provide the service or support, it may request to be added as a party by the court.
(5)If, after presentation of the CARE plan or plans, the court determines that additional information is needed, including from a licensed behavioral health professional, the court shall order a supplemental report to be filed by the county behavioral health agency for which the court may grant a continuance of no more than 14 days, unless there is good cause for a longer extension.
(6)If there is no CARE plan because the parties have not had sufficient time to complete it, the court may grant a continuance of no more than 14 days, unless there is good cause for a longer extension.
(7)This subdivision does not prohibit the parties from agreeing to, and the court from approving, amendments to the CARE plan. The court may also approve amendments to the CARE plan upon the finding that those amendments are necessary to support the respondent in accessing appropriate services and supports, following a hearing on the issue.
(e)The issuance of an order approving a CARE plan pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) begins the CARE process timeline, which shall not exceed one year.
SEC. 7.Section 5977.3 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5977.3.(a)(1)In the 11th month of the process timeline, the court shall hold a one-year status hearing. Not fewer than five court days prior to the one-year status hearing, the county behavioral health agency shall file a report with the court and shall serve the report on the respondent and the respondents counsel and supporter. The report shall include the following information:
(A)The progress that the respondent has made on the CARE plan, including a final assessment of the respondents stability.
(B)What services and supports in the CARE plan were provided, and what services and supports were not provided, over the life of the program.
(C)Any issues the respondent expressed or exhibited in adhering to the CARE plan.
(D)Recommendations for next steps, including what ongoing and additional services would benefit the respondent that the county behavioral health agency can facilitate or provide.
(2)At an evidentiary hearing, the respondent shall be permitted to respond to the report submitted by the county behavioral health agency and to the county behavioral health agencys testimony. The respondent shall be permitted to introduce their own information and recommendations. The respondent shall have the right at the hearing to call witnesses and to present evidence as to whether the respondent agrees with the report. The respondent may request either to be graduated from the program or to remain in the program.
(3)The court shall issue an order as follows:
(A)If the respondent requests to be graduated from the program, and the respondent has successfully completed the CARE process, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency and the respondent to work jointly on a voluntary graduation plan and the court shall schedule a hearing in the 12th month after adoption of the CARE plan for presentation of the graduation plan. The court shall review the graduation plan and recite the terms in open court. The graduation plan shall not place additional requirements on local governmental entities and is not enforceable by the court, except that the graduation plan may, at the respondents election, include a psychiatric advance directive, which shall have the force of law. Upon completion of the hearing, the respondent shall be officially graduated from the program.
(B)If the respondent requests to remain in the CARE process, the respondent may request any amount of time, up to and including one additional year. The court may approve the request and thereby permit the ongoing voluntary participation of the respondent if the court finds both of the following:
(i)The respondent did not successfully complete the CARE plan.
(ii)The respondent would benefit from continuation of the CARE plan.
(C)The court shall issue an order permitting the respondent to continue in the CARE plan or denying the respondents request to remain in the CARE plan, and state its reasons in open court.
(b)The respondent may be involuntarily reappointed to the program only if the court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that all of the following conditions apply:
(1)The respondent did not successfully complete the CARE process.
(2)All services and supports required through the CARE process were provided to the respondent.
(3)The respondent would benefit from continuation in the CARE process.
(4)The respondent currently meets the requirements in Section 5972.
(c)A respondent may only be reappointed to the CARE process once, for up to one additional year.
SEC. 8.Section 5978 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5978.(a)A court may refer an individual from assisted outpatient treatment, from conservatorship proceedings pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 5350) of Part 1 of Division 5 (LPS conservatorship), from misdemeanor proceedings pursuant to Section 1370.01 of the Penal Code, or from felony proceedings pursuant to Section 1370 of the Penal Code to the CARE Act court.
(b) The CARE Act court may consider a referral made pursuant to this section to be a petition satisfying the requirements of paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 5977 if both of the following conditions are met:
(1)The referral contains all of the information required to be included in a CARE process petition pursuant to Section 5975.
(2)The information included in the referral makes a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972.
(c)If the CARE Act court elects to consider a referral to be a petition pursuant to subdivision (b), the CARE Act court shall notify the referring court that the referral has been accepted as a petition for CARE Act proceedings.
(d)If the CARE Act court does not elect to consider a referral to be a petition pursuant to subdivision (b), the CARE Act court shall order the appropriate petitioner candidate to do the following within 14 court days:
(1)Complete an investigation to determine whether to file a petition on behalf of the referred individual.
(2)Notify the referring court whether it intends to file a CARE Act petition on behalf of the referred individual.
(e)If the appropriate petitioner candidate notifies the CARE Act court that it requires additional time to complete its investigation pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the CARE Act court may grant an extension of up to 30 court days.
(f)For purposes of this section, appropriate petitioner candidate means:
(1)For referrals from assisted outpatient treatment or from misdemeanor or felony proceedings, the county behavioral health director or their designee.
(2)For referrals from conservatorship proceedings, the conservator or proposed conservator.
SEC. 9.Section 5985 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5985.(a)(1)The department shall develop, in consultation with county behavioral health agencies, other relevant state or local government entities, disability rights groups, individuals with lived experience, families, counsel, racial justice experts, and other appropriate stakeholders, an annual CARE Act report. The department shall post the annual report on its internet website.
(2)The department, in consultation with county behavioral health agencies and courts, shall specify the length of time that data on former participants shall be reported pursuant to subdivision (e), which shall be a minimum of 12 months after completion of and a maximum of 36 months following engagement in CARE Act elective services, a CARE agreement, or CARE plan.
(3)For the purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(A)Former participant means an individual who enters into CARE Act elective services, a CARE agreement, or a CARE plan, but who has either graduated from CARE, or for whom CARE Act proceedings were dismissed or terminated. Counties shall not be responsible for reporting on any individual who is privately insured or who no longer resides in California.
(B)Active participants means an individual who is an elective client, or who has a CARE plan or CARE agreement.
(b)County behavioral health agencies and any other state or local governmental entity, as identified by the department, shall provide data related to the CARE Act participants, services, and supports to the department. The department shall determine the data measures and specifications, and shall publish them via guidance issues pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 5984.
(c)Each county behavioral health department and any other state and local governmental entity, as identified by the department, shall provide the required data to the department, in a format and frequency as directed by the department.
(d)(1)In consultation with the Judicial Council, the department shall develop an annual reporting schedule for the submission of CARE Act data from the trial courts.
(2)Data from the trial courts shall be submitted to the Judicial Council, which shall aggregate the data and submit it to the department consistent with the reporting schedule developed pursuant to paragraph (1).
(3)On an annual basis to be determined by the Judicial Council and consistent with the annual reporting schedule developed pursuant to paragraph (1), the trial courts shall report to the Judicial Council the following data related to CARE Act petitions:
(A)The number of petitions submitted pursuant to Section 5975.
(B)The number of initial appearance hearings on the petition held pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 5977.
(C)The total number of hearings held pursuant to this part.
(D)The total number of CARE plans ordered and CARE agreements approved.
(E)The total number of court petitions dismissed, as reported by the Judicial Council.
(e)The annual report shall include process measures to examine the scope of impact and monitor the performance of CARE Act model implementation. The measures and reporting requirements shall be developed by the department in consultation with county behavioral health agencies. The report shall include trial court petition data pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (d) and, to the extent administrative data is available, all of the following information compiled from county behavioral health departments and courts:
(1)The demographics of all participants, including, but not limited to, the age, sex, race, ethnicity, disability, languages spoken, sexual orientation, gender identity, housing status, veteran status, immigration status, health coverage status, including Medi-Cal enrollment status, information related to CARE criteria outlined in Section 5972, and county of residence.
(2)The petitioners relationship to the CARE Act respondent as defined in Section 5974.
(3)The services and supports ordered, the services and supports provided, and the services and supports ordered but not provided to all active and former participants.
(4)The housing placements of all active and former participants. Placements include, but are not limited to, transition to a higher level of care, independent living in the persons own house or apartment, community-based housing, community-based housing with services, shelter, and no housing.
(5)Treatments continued and terminated of all active and former participants.
(6)Substance use disorder rates and rates of treatment among all active and former participants.
(7)Detentions and other Lanterman-Petris-Short Act involvement for all active and former participants.
(8)Criminal justice involvement of all active and former participants.
(9)Deaths among all active and former participants, along with the cause of death.
(10)Type, format, and frequency of outreach and engagement activities provided by a county behavioral health agency to engage an individual who is the subject of a referral or petition, including interactions about the individuals eligible or likely to be eligible and outcomes of these efforts.
(11)In consultation with the department and county behavioral health departments, the number, rates, and trends of contacts made to the county behavioral health agency about individuals eligible or likely to be eligible for the CARE process, including outcomes of those contacts.
(12)The number, rates, and source of referrals to county behavioral health departments, including, but not limited to, referrals resulting in a petition or reason for not filing a petition, length of time from referral to outcome, and services provided for those engaged voluntarily without a petition.
(13)The number, rates, and trends of petitions resulting in dismissal and hearings.
(14)Information on petition dispositions, including, but not limited to, disposition recommendations and the number of days from petition to disposition.
(15)The number, rates, and trends of supporters.
(16)The number, rates, and trends of approved CARE agreements.
(17)The number, rates, and trends of ordered and completed CARE plans.
(18)Statistics on the services and supports, including court orders for stabilizing medications.
(19)The rates of adherence to medication.
(20)The number, rates, and trends of psychiatric advance directives created for active participants.
(21)The number, rates, and trends of developed graduation plans.
(22)Outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of the CARE Act model, such as improvement in housing status, including gaining and maintaining housing, reductions in emergency department visits and inpatient hospitalizations, reductions in law enforcement encounters and incarceration, reductions in involuntary treatment and conservatorship, and reductions in substance use.
(23)A health equity assessment of the CARE Act to identify demographic disparities based on demographic data in paragraph (1), and to inform disparity reduction efforts.
(24)Data regarding referrals made pursuant to Section 5978.1, as part of the CARE Act.
(f)(1)The report shall include, at a minimum, information on the effectiveness of the CARE Act model in improving outcomes and reducing disparities, homelessness, criminal justice involvement, conservatorships, and hospitalization of participants. The annual report shall include process measures to examine the scope of impact and monitor the performance of CARE Act model implementation, such as the number and source of petitions filed for CARE Court; the number, rates, and trends of petitions resulting in dismissal and hearings; the number, rates, and trends of supporters; the number, rates, and trends of voluntary CARE agreements; the number, rates, and trends of ordered and completed CARE plans; the services and supports included in CARE plans, including court orders for stabilizing medications; the rates of adherence to medication; the number, rates, and trends of psychiatric advance directives; and the number, rates, and trends of developed graduation plans. The report shall include outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of the CARE Act model, such as improvement in housing status, including gaining and maintaining housing; reductions in emergency department visits and inpatient hospitalizations; reductions in law enforcement encounters and incarceration; reductions in involuntary treatment and conservatorship; and reductions in substance use. The annual report shall examine these data through the lens of health equity to identify racial, ethnic, and other demographic disparities and inform disparity reduction efforts.
(2)Data shall be stratified by age, sex, race, ethnicity, languages spoken, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, housing status, veteran status, immigration status, health coverage source, and county, to the extent statistically relevant data is available.
(g)The outcomes shall be presented to relevant state oversight bodies, including, but not limited to, the California Interagency Council on Homelessness.
(h)(1)Beginning in 2026, the department shall include in its annual CARE Act report quantitative, deidentified information concerning the operation of this part.
(2)Based on information provided to the department in a form and manner specified by the department, in consultation with the Judicial Council and county behavioral health departments, in accordance with subdivision (b) of Section 5984, the report shall include all of the following information, aggregated by county, compiled from county behavioral health departments, courts, and the department, depending on the source:
(A)The number of contacts to the county behavioral health department about individuals eligible or likely to be eligible for the CARE process, including outcome of contacts.
(B)The number of CARE petitions filed with the superior court.
(C)The petitioner type for each petition filed with the superior court.
(D)Disposition of each petition filed with the superior court.
(E)The number of days between filing each petition and the petitions disposition.
(F)Demographic information of each CARE Act participant or potentially eligible CARE Act participant, including, but not limited to, age, sex, race, ethnicity, disability, languages spoken, sexual orientation, gender identity, housing status, veteran status, immigration status, health coverage status, including Medi-Cal enrollment status, information related to CARE criteria outlined in Section 5972, and county of residence, to the extent administrative data is available and statistically relevant.
(G)The number of referrals of individuals in conservatorship proceedings made pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 5978, including the disposition of each referral.
(H)The number of referrals made pursuant to Section 5978.1, including the disposition of each referral.
(i)Information publicly released or published pursuant to this part shall not contain data that may lead to the identification of participants or petitioners or information that would otherwise allow an individual to link the published information to a specific person. Data published by the department shall be deidentified in compliance with Section 164.514(a) and (b) of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
SEC. 10.If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(a)If the defendant is found mentally competent, the criminal process shall resume, and the trial on the offense charged or hearing on the alleged violation shall proceed.
(b)If the defendant is found mentally incompetent, the trial, judgment, or hearing on the alleged violation shall be suspended and the court shall, after notice to the defendant, defense counsel, and the prosecution, hold a hearing to determine whether to do one or more of the following:
(1)(A)(i)Conduct a hearing, pursuant to Chapter 2.8A (commencing with Section 1001.35) of Title 6, and, if the court deems the defendant eligible and suitable, grant diversion pursuant to Section 1001.36 for a period not to exceed one year from the date the individual is accepted into diversion or the maximum term of imprisonment provided by law for the most serious offense charged in the misdemeanor complaint, whichever is shorter.
(ii)Notwithstanding any other law, including Section 23640 of the Vehicle Code, a misdemeanor offense for which a defendant may be placed in a mental health diversion program in accordance with this section includes a misdemeanor violation of Section 23152 or 23153 of the Vehicle Code. However, this section does not limit the authority of the Department of Motor Vehicles to take administrative action concerning the driving privileges of a person arrested for a violation of Section 23152 or 23153 of the Vehicle Code.
(B)Any hearing to determine eligibility and suitability for diversion shall be held no later than 30 days after the finding of incompetence. If the hearing is delayed beyond 30 days, the court shall order the defendant to be released on their own recognizance pending the hearing.
(C)If the defendant performs satisfactorily on diversion pursuant to this section, at the end of the period of diversion, the court shall dismiss the criminal charges that were the subject of the criminal proceedings at the time of the initial diversion.
(2)Refer the defendant to the CARE Act court pursuant to Section 5978 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, if the defendant or counsel for the defendant agrees to the referral and the court has reason to believe that the defendant may be eligible for the CARE program. The CARE Act court shall hold a hearing to determine eligibility for the CARE program within 30 court days after the date of the referral. If the hearing is delayed beyond 30 court days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in a county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing. If the defendant is accepted into the CARE program, the CARE Act court shall notify the criminal court of the acceptance, and the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 six months after the date of the referral to the CARE program, unless the defendants case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that six-month time period. If the defendant is not accepted into the CARE program or if the CARE Act court refers the defendant back to criminal court before the expiration of the six-month time period, the court shall proceed as provided in paragraph (1). Except as provided in this section and Sections 5978 and 5978.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, this paragraph does not alter the confidential nature of CARE program proceedings.
(c)If the court finds the defendant ineligible or unsuitable for diversion based on the circumstances set forth in subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (g) of Section 1001.36, the court shall, after notice to the defendant, defense counsel, and the prosecution, hold a hearing to determine which one of the following actions the court will take:
(1)Order modification of an existing mental health diversion treatment plan in accordance with a recommendation from the treatment provider.
(2)Refer the defendant to assisted outpatient treatment pursuant to Section 5346 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. A referral to assisted outpatient treatment may only occur in a county where services are available pursuant to Section 5348 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, and the agency agrees to accept responsibility for treatment of the defendant. A hearing to determine eligibility for assisted outpatient treatment shall be held within 45 days after the finding of incompetency. If the hearing is delayed beyond 45 days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing. If the defendant is accepted into assisted outpatient treatment, the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 six months after the date of the referral to assisted outpatient treatment, unless the defendants case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that time period. This section does not alter the confidential nature of assisted outpatient treatment.
(3)Refer the defendant to the county conservatorship investigator in the county of commitment for possible conservatorship proceedings for the defendant pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 5350) of Part 1 of Division 5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. A defendant shall only be referred to the conservatorship investigator if, based on the opinion of a qualified mental health expert, the defendant appears to be gravely disabled, as defined in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (h) of Section 5008 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. Any hearings required in the conservatorship proceedings shall be held in the superior court in the county of commitment. The court shall transmit a copy of the order directing initiation of conservatorship proceedings to the county mental health director or the directors designee and shall notify the county mental health director or their designee of the outcome of the proceedings. Before establishing a conservatorship, the public guardian shall investigate all available alternatives to conservatorship pursuant to Section 5354 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. If a petition is not filed within 30 days of the referral, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending conservatorship proceedings. If the outcome of the conservatorship proceedings results in the filing of a petition for the establishment of a temporary or permanent conservatorship, the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 90 days after the date of the filing of the petition, unless the defendants case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that time period. This section does not alter the confidential nature of conservatorship proceedings.
(4)Refer the defendant to the CARE Act court pursuant to Section 5978 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. The CARE Act court shall hold a hearing to determine eligibility for the CARE program within 14 court days after the date of the referral. that the petition is filed. If the hearing is delayed beyond 14 court days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in a county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing. If the defendant is accepted into the CARE program, the CARE Act court shall notify the criminal court of the acceptance, and the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 six months after the date of the referral to the CARE program, unless the defendants case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that time period. Except as provided in this section and Sections 5978 and 5978.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, this paragraph does not alter the confidential nature of CARE program proceedings.
(5)If the defendant does not qualify for services pursuant to paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive, dismiss the charges.
(d)It is the intent of the Legislature that a defendant subject to the terms of this section receive mental health treatment in a treatment facility and not a jail. A term of four days will be deemed to have been served for every two days spent in actual custody against the maximum period of treatment pursuant to paragraphs (2) and (4) of subdivision (c) and paragraphs (1) and (2) of subdivision (b), if applicable. A defendant not in actual custody shall otherwise receive day for day credit against the term of treatment from the date the defendant is accepted into treatment in the event that the criminal charges have not previously been dismissed. Actual custody has the same meaning as in Section 4019.
(e)The county behavioral health agency and jail medical providers may share confidential medical records and other relevant information with the court, including, but not limited to, prior interactions with and treatment of the defendant, for the purpose of determining likelihood of eligibility for behavioral health services and programs pursuant to this section. The disclosure of information pursuant to this subdivision is subject to applicable state and federal privacy laws.
(f)This section shall apply only as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 1367.
(g)It is the intent of the Legislature that the court shall consider all treatment options as provided in this section prior to dismissing criminal charges. However, nothing in this section limits a courts discretion pursuant to Section 1385.
SEC. 2.Section 5971 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5971.Unless the context otherwise requires, the following definitions shall govern the construction of this part.
(a)CARE agreement means a voluntary settlement agreement entered into by the parties. A CARE agreement includes the same elements as a CARE plan to support the respondent in accessing community-based services and supports.
(b)CARE plan means an individualized, appropriate range of community-based services and supports, as set forth in this part, which include clinically appropriate behavioral health care and stabilization medications, housing, and other supportive services, as appropriate, pursuant to Section 5982.
(c)CARE process means the court and related proceedings to implement the CARE Act.
(d)Clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment means both of the following:
(1)The persons condition is stable and not deteriorating.
(2)The person is currently engaged in treatment and managing symptoms through medication or other therapeutic interventions. Enrollment in treatment alone shall not be considered clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment.
(e)Counsel means the attorney representing the respondent, appointed pursuant to Section 5977, or chosen by the respondent, in CARE Act proceedings and matters related to CARE agreements and CARE plans. Representation of a respondent in these matters does not alter counsels obligations under the State Bar Act and the Rules of Professional Conduct, including subdivision (e) of Section 6068 of the Business and Professions Code and rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.
(f)County behavioral health agency means the local director of mental health services described in Section 5607, the local behavioral health director, or both as applicable, or their designee.
(g)Court-ordered evaluation means an evaluation ordered by a superior court pursuant to Section 5977.1.
(h)Department means the State Department of Health Care Services.
(i)Graduation plan means a voluntary agreement entered into by the parties at the end of the CARE program that includes a strategy to support a successful transition out of court jurisdiction and that may include a psychiatric advance directive. A graduation plan includes the same elements as a CARE plan to support the respondent in accessing community-based services and supports. The graduation plan shall not place additional requirements on the local government entities and is not enforceable by the court.
(j)Homeless outreach worker means a person who engages people experiencing homelessness to assess for unmet needs, offer information, services, or other assistance, or provide care coordination.
(k)Indian health care provider means a health care program operated by the Indian Health Service, an Indian tribe, a tribal organization, or urban Indian organization (I/T/U) as those terms are defined in Section 4 of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1603).
(l)Legal proceeding means any administrative, civil, or criminal proceeding, including, but not limited to, juvenile court proceedings and family court proceedings and services, and any form of alternative dispute resolution, including arbitration and mediation, except for the following:
(1)A proceeding under this part.
(2)A proceeding under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act described in paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 5979.
(3)A proceeding from which the respondent was referred to CARE Act proceedings as described in Section 5978.
(4)A disciplinary proceeding under Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 6000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code.
(5)An appeal from any of the proceedings identified in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive.
(m)Licensed behavioral health professional means either of the following:
(1)A licensed mental health professional, as defined in subdivision (j) of Section 4096.
(2)A person who has been granted a waiver of licensure requirements by the department pursuant to Section 5751.2.
(n)Parties means the petitioner, the respondent, the county behavioral health agency in the county where proceedings under this part are pending, and any local governmental entity added by the court pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 5977.1.
(o)Petitioner means the person who files the CARE Act petition with the court. Additionally, if the petitioner is a person listed in Section 5974 other than the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the petitioner shall have the right to file a petition with the court, but at the initial hearing the court shall substitute the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, of the county in which the proceedings are filed as petitioner. The original petitioner may, at the courts discretion and in furtherance of the interests of the respondent, retain rights as described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (6) of subdivision (b) of Section 5977.
(p)Psychiatric advance directive means a legal document, executed on a voluntary basis in accordance with the requirements for advance health care directives in Division 4.7 (commencing with Section 4600) of the Probate Code, by a person who has the capacity to make medical decisions, that allows a person with mental illness to protect their autonomy and ability to direct their own care by documenting their preferences for treatment in advance of a mental health crisis.
(q)Respondent means the person who is the subject of the petition for the CARE process.
(r)Stabilization medications means medications included in the CARE plan that primarily consist of antipsychotic medications to reduce symptoms of hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized thinking. Stabilization medications may be administered as long-acting injections if clinically indicated. Stabilization medications shall not be forcibly administered.
(s)Supporter means an adult designated by the respondent who assists the person who is the subject of the petition, which assistance may include supporting the person to understand, make, communicate, implement, or act on their own life decisions during the CARE process, including a CARE agreement, a CARE plan, and developing a graduation plan. A supporter shall not act independently.
SEC. 3.Section 5972 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5972.An individual shall qualify for the CARE process only if all of the following criteria are met:
(a)The person is 18 years of age or older.
(b)The person is currently experiencing a serious mental disorder, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 5600.3 and has a diagnosis identified in the disorder class: schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, or bipolar I disorder with psychotic features, except psychosis related to current intoxication, as defined in the most current version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. This section does not establish respondent eligibility based upon a psychotic disorder that is due to a medical condition or is not primarily psychiatric in nature, including, but not limited to, physical health conditions such as traumatic brain injury, autism, dementia, or neurologic conditions. A person who has a current diagnosis of substance use disorder as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 1374.72 of the Health and Safety Code but who does not also meet the required criteria in this section shall not qualify for the CARE process.
(c)The person is not clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment.
(d)At least one of the following is true:
(1)The person is unlikely to survive safely in the community without supervision and the persons condition is substantially deteriorating.
(2)The person is in need of services and supports in order to prevent a relapse or deterioration that would be likely to result in grave disability or serious harm to the person or others, as used in Section 5150.
(e)Participation in a CARE plan or CARE agreement would be the least restrictive alternative necessary to ensure the persons recovery and stability.
(f)It is likely that the person will benefit from participation in a CARE plan or CARE agreement.
SEC. 4.Section 5975 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5975.The Judicial Council shall develop a mandatory form for use to file a CARE process petition with the court and any other forms necessary for the CARE process. The petition shall be signed under the penalty of perjury and contain all of the following:
(a)The name of the respondent and, if known, the respondents address.
(b)The petitioners relationship to the respondent.
(c)Facts that support the petitioners assertion that the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972.
(d)Either of the following:
(1)An affidavit of a licensed behavioral health professional, including, for purposes of this section only, nurse practitioners as defined in Section 2835 of the Business and Professions Code and physician assistants as defined in subdivision (d) of Section 3501 of the Business and Professions Code, stating that the licensed behavioral health professional or their designee has examined the respondent within 60 days of the submission of the petition, or has made multiple attempts to examine, but has not been successful in eliciting the cooperation of the respondent to submit to an examination, within 60 days of the petition, and that the licensed behavioral health professional had determined that the respondent meets, or has reason to believe, explained with specificity in the affidavit, that the respondent meets the diagnostic criteria for CARE proceedings.
(2)Evidence that the respondent was detained for a minimum of two intensive treatments pursuant to Article 4 (commencing with Section 5250) of Chapter 2 of Part 1, the most recent one within the previous 60 days. Evidence may include, but is not limited to, documentary evidence from the facility where the respondent was detained, or a signed declaration from the petitioner if the petitioner had personal knowledge of the detentions.
SEC. 5.Section 5977 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5977.(a)(1)The court shall promptly review the petition to determine if the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972. The court may make a prima facie determination without conducting a hearing.
(2)If the court finds that the petitioner has not made a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, the court may dismiss the case and, if the court does so, it shall order that the dismissal is without prejudice, unless Section 5975.1 applies. Nothing other than Section 5975.1 prevents a petitioner whose petition was dismissed without prejudice from refiling the petition with amended information.
(3)If the court finds that the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, the court shall do one of the following:
(A)If the petitioner is the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the court shall do the following:
(i)Set the matter for an initial appearance on the petition within 14 court days.
(ii)Appoint a qualified legal services project, as defined in Sections 6213 to 6214.5, inclusive, of the Business and Professions Code, to represent the respondent. If no legal services project has agreed to accept these appointments, a public defender or other counsel working in that capacity shall be appointed to represent the respondent.
(iii)Determine whether the petition includes all of the following information and, if it does not, order the county behavioral health agency to submit a written report with the court within 14 court days that includes all of the following:
(I)A determination as to whether the respondent meets, or is likely to meet, the criteria for the CARE process.
(II)The outcome of efforts made to voluntarily engage the respondent prior to the filing of the petition.
(III)Conclusions and recommendations about the respondents ability to voluntarily engage in services.
(iv)Order the county behavioral health agency to provide notice to the respondent, the appointed counsel, and the county behavioral health agency in the county where the respondent resides, if different from the county where the CARE process has commenced.
(B)If the petitioner is a person other than the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the court shall order a county agency, or their designee, as determined by the court, to investigate, as necessary, file a written report with the court as soon as practicable, but within 30 court days, and provide notice to the respondent and petitioner that a report has been ordered. Parties shall complete the investigation with appropriate urgency. The written report shall include all of the following:
(i)A determination as to whether the respondent meets, or is likely to meet, the criteria for the CARE process.
(ii)The outcome of efforts made to voluntarily engage the respondent during the report period.
(iii)Conclusions and recommendations about the respondents ability to voluntarily engage in services.
(iv)The information, including protected health information, necessary to support the determinations, conclusions, and recommendations in the report.
(4)If, upon a request by the county agency ordered to investigate and file a report under subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3), the court finds that the county agency is making progress to engage the respondent, the court may, in its discretion, grant the county agency no more than 30 additional days to continue to work with, engage, and enroll the individual in voluntary treatment and services. The county agency shall provide notice to the respondent and petitioner that an extension for filing a report has been granted.
(5)Upon receipt of the report described in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3), the court shall, within five days, take one of the following actions:
(A)If the court determines that voluntary engagement with the respondent is effective, and that the individual has enrolled or is likely to enroll in voluntary behavioral health treatment, the court shall dismiss the matter.
(B)If the court determines, based on the county agencys report, that the evidence does not support a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, the court shall dismiss the matter. This section shall not prevent a county behavioral health agency from continuing to voluntarily engage with a person not described in Section 5972 but who is in need of services and supports.
(C)If the court determines, based on the county agencys report, that the evidence does support a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, and engagement with the county agency was not effective, the court shall do all of the following:
(i)Set an initial appearance on the petition within 14 court days.
(ii)Appoint a qualified legal services project, as defined in Sections 6213 to 6214.5, inclusive, of the Business and Professions Code or, if no legal services project has agreed to accept these appointments, a public defender or other counsel working in that capacity to represent the respondent.
(iii)Order the county agency to provide notice of the initial appearance to the petitioner, the respondent, the appointed counsel, the county behavioral health agency in the county where the respondent resides, and, if different, the county where the CARE court proceedings have commenced.
(b)At the initial appearance on the petition, all of the following shall apply:
(1)The court shall permit the respondent to substitute their own counsel.
(2)Petitioner shall be present. If the petitioner is not present, the matter may be dismissed.
(3)Respondent may waive personal appearance and appear through counsel. If the respondent does not waive personal appearance and does not appear at the hearing, and the court makes a finding in open court that reasonable attempts to elicit the attendance of the respondent have failed, the court may conduct the hearing in the respondents absence if the court makes a finding in open court that conducting the hearing without the participation or presence of the respondent would be in the respondents best interest.
(4)A representative from the county behavioral health agency shall be present.
(5)If the respondent asserts that they are enrolled in a federally recognized Indian tribe or are receiving services from an Indian health care provider, a tribal court, or a tribal organization, a representative from the program, the tribe, or the tribal court shall be allowed to be present, subject to the consent of the respondent. The tribal representative shall be entitled to notice by the county of the initial appearance.
(6)(A)If the petitioner is a person other than the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the court shall issue an order relieving the original petitioner and appointing the director of the county behavioral health agency or their designee as the successor petitioner.
(B)If the original petitioner is described in subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 5974, all of the following apply:
(i)The original petitioner shall have the right to be present and make a statement at the initial hearing on the merits of the petition held pursuant to paragraph (7).
(ii)(I)Until July 1, 2025, the court may, in its discretion, assign ongoing rights of notice to the original petitioner.
(II)Commencing July 1, 2025, unless the court determines, either upon its own motion or upon the motion of the respondent, at any point in the proceedings, that it likely would be detrimental to the treatment or well-being of the respondent, the court shall provide ongoing notice of proceedings to the original petitioner throughout the CARE proceedings, including notice of when a continuance is granted or when a case is dismissed. If a continuance is granted, the notice shall provide a general reason for the continuance, including the absence of the respondent or one of the grounds pursuant to Rule 3.1332 of the California Rules of Court. If a case is dismissed, the notice shall specify the statutory basis for the dismissal. A notice pursuant to this clause shall not disclose any patient information that is protected under the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-191), the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (Part 2.6 (commencing with Section 56) of Division 1 of the Civil Code), or this act, without the respondents consent.
(iii)To the extent that the respondent consents, the court may allow the original petitioner to participate in the respondents CARE proceedings.
(iv)The original petitioner may file a new petition with the court, pursuant to Section 5974, if the matter is dismissed and there is a change in circumstances.
(C)If the original petitioner is not described in subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 5974, the court shall not assign ongoing rights to the original petitioner, other than the right to be present and make a statement at the hearing on the merits of the petition held pursuant to paragraph (7).
(7)(A)The court shall set a hearing on the merits of the petition within 10 days, at which time the court shall determine whether, by clear and convincing evidence, the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972. In making this determination, the court shall consider all evidence properly before it, including any report from the county behavioral health agency ordered pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) and any additional admissible evidence presented by the parties, including the petition submitted and any statement given by the original petitioner. A licensed behavioral health professional may testify as an expert concerning whether the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972 provided that the court finds that the professional has special knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education sufficient to qualify as an expert under Section 720 of the Evidence Code.
(B)The hearing on the merits of the petition may be conducted concurrently with the initial appearance upon stipulation of the successor petitioner and the respondent, subject to the approval by the court.
(c)(1)If, at the hearing on the merits of the petition, the court finds there is not clear and convincing evidence that the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972, the court shall dismiss the case without prejudice, unless the court makes a finding, in open court, that the original petitioners filing was not in good faith, in which case the dismissal shall be with prejudice.
(2)If, at the hearing on the merits of the petition, the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency to work with the respondent, the respondents counsel, and the supporter to engage the respondent in behavioral health treatment and attempt to enter into a CARE agreement. The court shall set a case management hearing within 14 days.
(3)If the respondent is enrolled in a federally recognized Indian tribe, the county shall provide notice of the case management hearing to the tribe, subject to the consent of the respondent.
(d)The following shall apply to any written report submitted by a county behavioral health agency to the court pursuant to this section:
(1)The report is confidential and not subject to disclosure or inspection under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(2)The report is inadmissible in any subsequent legal proceeding, except upon motion of the respondent in that subsequent legal proceeding.
(3)The report shall be confidential pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 5976.5.
(4)This subdivision shall not affect the applicability of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 5977.1, make admissible any evidence that is not otherwise admissible, or permit a witness to base an opinion on any matter that is not a proper basis for such an opinion. The admission or exclusion of evidence shall be pursuant to the rules of evidence established by the Evidence Code, including, but not limited to, Section 352 of the Evidence Code, and by judicial decision.
SEC. 6.Section 5977.1 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5977.1.(a)(1)At the case management hearing, the court shall hear evidence as to whether the parties have entered, or are likely to enter, into a CARE agreement.
(2)If the court finds that the parties have entered, or are likely to enter, into a CARE agreement, the court shall do one of the following:
(A)Approve the terms of the CARE agreement or modify the terms of the CARE agreement and approve the agreement as modified by the court, and continue the matter and set a progress hearing for 60 days.
(B)Continue the matter for 14 days to allow the parties additional time to enter into a CARE agreement, upon stipulation of the parties.
(3)Nothing in this subdivision shall prohibit the parties from agreeing to, and the court from approving, amendments to the CARE agreement.
(4)The court may, in its discretion, call additional progress hearings beyond the hearing set at 60 days, for the duration of the CARE agreement.
(b)If the court finds that the parties have not entered into a CARE agreement, and are not likely to enter into a CARE agreement, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency, through a licensed behavioral health professional, to conduct a clinical evaluation of the respondent, unless there is an existing clinical evaluation of the respondent completed within the last 30 days and the parties stipulate to the use of that evaluation. The evaluation shall address, at a minimum, the following:
(1)A clinical diagnosis of the respondent.
(2)Whether the respondent has the legal capacity to give informed consent regarding psychotropic medication.
(3)Any other information as ordered by the court or that the licensed behavioral health professional conducting the evaluation determines would help the court make future informed decisions about the appropriate care and services the respondent should receive.
(4)An analysis of recommended services, programs, housing, medications, and interventions that support the recovery and stability of the respondent.
(c)(1)The court shall set a clinical evaluation hearing to review the evaluation within 21 days. The court shall order the county to file the evaluation with the court and provide the evaluation to the respondents counsel no later than five days prior to the scheduled clinical evaluation hearing. The clinical evaluation hearing may be continued for a maximum of 14 days upon stipulation of the respondent and the county behavioral health agency, unless there is good cause for a longer extension.
(2)At the clinical evaluation review hearing, the court shall review the evaluation and other evidence from the county behavioral health agency and the respondent. The county behavioral health agency and the respondent may present evidence and call witnesses, including the person who conducted the evaluation. Only relevant and admissible evidence that fully complies with the rules of evidence may be considered by the court.
(3)At the conclusion of the hearing, the court shall determine whether the respondent, by clear and convincing evidence, meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972 and make orders as follows:
(A)If the court finds that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency, the respondent, and the respondents counsel and supporter to jointly develop a CARE plan within 14 days.
(B)If the court does not find that clear and convincing evidence establishes that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, the court shall dismiss the petition.
(4)If the respondent is a self-identified American Indian or Alaska Native individual, as defined in Sections 1603(13), 1603(28), and 1679(a) of Title 25 of the United States Code, has been determined eligible as an Indian under Section 136.12 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, or is currently receiving services from an Indian health care provider or tribal court, the county behavioral health agency shall use its best efforts to meaningfully consult with and incorporate the Indian health care provider or tribal court available to the respondent to develop the CARE plan.
(5)The evaluation and all reports, documents, and filings submitted to the court shall be confidential.
(6)The date for the hearing to review and consider approval of the proposed CARE plan shall be set not more than 14 days from the date of the order to develop a CARE plan, unless the court finds good cause for an extension. The party requesting an extension of time for the CARE plan review hearing shall provide notice to the opposing party and their counsel of the request for extension of time, and the courts order if the request is granted.
(d)(1)At the CARE plan review hearing, the parties shall present their plan or plans to the court. The county behavioral health agency or the respondent, or both, may present a proposed CARE plan.
(2)After consideration of the plans proposed by the parties, the court shall adopt the elements of a CARE plan that support the recovery and stability of the respondent. The court may issue any orders necessary to support the respondent in accessing appropriate services and supports, including prioritization for those services and supports, subject to applicable laws and available funding pursuant to Section 5982. These orders shall constitute the CARE plan and may be amended.
(3)A court may order medication if it finds, upon review of the court-ordered evaluation and hearing from the parties, that, by clear and convincing evidence, the respondent lacks the capacity to give informed consent to the administration of medically necessary stabilization medication. To the extent the court orders medically necessary stabilization medication, the medication shall not be forcibly administered and the respondents failure to comply with a medication order shall not result in a penalty, including, but not limited to, contempt or termination of the CARE plan pursuant to Section 5979.
(4)If the proposed CARE plan includes services and supports, such as housing, provided directly or indirectly through another local governmental entity, that local entity may agree to provide the service or support, or the court may consider a motion by either of the parties to add the local entity as a party to the CARE proceeding. If the local entity agrees to provide the service or support, it may request to be added as a party by the court.
(5)If, after presentation of the CARE plan or plans, the court determines that additional information is needed, including from a licensed behavioral health professional, the court shall order a supplemental report to be filed by the county behavioral health agency for which the court may grant a continuance of no more than 14 days, unless there is good cause for a longer extension.
(6)If there is no CARE plan because the parties have not had sufficient time to complete it, the court may grant a continuance of no more than 14 days, unless there is good cause for a longer extension.
(7)This subdivision does not prohibit the parties from agreeing to, and the court from approving, amendments to the CARE plan. The court may also approve amendments to the CARE plan upon the finding that those amendments are necessary to support the respondent in accessing appropriate services and supports, following a hearing on the issue.
(e)The issuance of an order approving a CARE plan pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) begins the CARE process timeline, which shall not exceed one year.
SEC. 7.Section 5977.3 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5977.3.(a)(1)In the 11th month of the process timeline, the court shall hold a one-year status hearing. Not fewer than five court days prior to the one-year status hearing, the county behavioral health agency shall file a report with the court and shall serve the report on the respondent and the respondents counsel and supporter. The report shall include the following information:
(A)The progress that the respondent has made on the CARE plan, including a final assessment of the respondents stability.
(B)What services and supports in the CARE plan were provided, and what services and supports were not provided, over the life of the program.
(C)Any issues the respondent expressed or exhibited in adhering to the CARE plan.
(D)Recommendations for next steps, including what ongoing and additional services would benefit the respondent that the county behavioral health agency can facilitate or provide.
(2)At an evidentiary hearing, the respondent shall be permitted to respond to the report submitted by the county behavioral health agency and to the county behavioral health agencys testimony. The respondent shall be permitted to introduce their own information and recommendations. The respondent shall have the right at the hearing to call witnesses and to present evidence as to whether the respondent agrees with the report. The respondent may request either to be graduated from the program or to remain in the program.
(3)The court shall issue an order as follows:
(A)If the respondent requests to be graduated from the program, and the court approves this request, respondent has successfully completed the CARE process, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency and the respondent to work jointly on a voluntary graduation plan and the court shall schedule a hearing in the 12th month after adoption of the CARE plan for presentation of the graduation plan. The court shall review the graduation plan and recite the terms in open court. The graduation plan shall not place additional requirements on local governmental entities and is not enforceable by the court, except that the graduation plan may, at the respondents election, include a psychiatric advance directive, which shall have the force of law. Upon completion of the hearing, the respondent shall be officially graduated from the program.
(B)If the respondent requests to remain in the CARE process, the respondent may request any amount of time, up to and including one additional year. The court may approve the request and thereby permit the ongoing voluntary participation of the respondent if the court finds both of the following:
(i)The respondent did not successfully complete the CARE plan.
(ii)The respondent would benefit from continuation of the CARE plan.
(C)The court shall issue an order permitting the respondent to continue in the CARE plan or denying the respondents request to remain in the CARE plan, and state its reasons in open court.
(b)The respondent may be involuntarily reappointed to the program only if the court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that all of the following conditions apply:
(1)The respondent did not successfully complete the CARE process.
(2)All services and supports required through the CARE process were provided to the respondent.
(3)The respondent would benefit from continuation in the CARE process.
(4)The respondent currently meets the requirements in Section 5972.
(c)A respondent may only be reappointed to the CARE process once, for up to one additional year.
SEC. 8.Section 5978 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5978.(a)A court may refer an individual from assisted outpatient treatment, from conservatorship proceedings pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 5350) of Part 1 of Division 5 (LPS conservatorship), from misdemeanor proceedings pursuant to Section 1370.01 of the Penal Code, or from felony proceedings pursuant to Section 1370 of the Penal Code to the CARE Act court.
(b) The CARE Act court may consider a referral made pursuant to this section to be a petition satisfying the requirements of paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 5977 if both of the following conditions are met:
(1)The referral contains all of the information sufficient to otherwise satisfy the petition requirements in required to be included in a CARE process petition pursuant to Section 5975.
(2)The information included in the referral makes a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972.
(c)If the CARE Act court elects to consider a referral to be a petition pursuant to subdivision (b), the CARE Act court shall notify the referring court that the referral has been accepted as a petition for CARE Act proceedings.
(d)If the CARE Act court does not elect to consider a referral to be a petition pursuant to subdivision (b), the CARE Act court shall order the appropriate petitioner candidate to do the following within 14 court days:
(1)Complete an investigation to determine whether to file a petition on behalf of the referred individual.
(2)Notify the referring court whether it intends to file a CARE Act petition on behalf of the referred individual.
(e)If the appropriate petitioner candidate notifies the CARE Act court that it requires additional time to complete its investigation pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the CARE Act court may grant an extension of up to 30 court days.
(f)For purposes of this section, appropriate petitioner candidate means:
(1)For referrals from assisted outpatient treatment or from misdemeanor or felony proceedings, the county behavioral health director or their designee.
(2)For referrals from conservatorship proceedings, the conservator or proposed conservator.
SEC. 9.Section 5985 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5985.(a)(1)The department shall develop, in consultation with county behavioral health agencies, other relevant state or local government entities, disability rights groups, individuals with lived experience, families, counsel, racial justice experts, and other appropriate stakeholders, an annual CARE Act report. The department shall post the annual report on its internet website.
(2)The department, in consultation with county behavioral health agencies and courts, shall specify the length of time that data on former participants shall be reported pursuant to subdivision (e), which shall be a minimum of 12 months after completion of and a maximum of 36 months following engagement in CARE Act elective services, a CARE agreement, or CARE plan.
(3)For the purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(A)Former participant means an individual who enters into CARE Act elective services, a CARE agreement, or a CARE plan, but who has either graduated from CARE, or for whom CARE Act proceedings were dismissed or terminated. Counties shall not be responsible for reporting on any individual who is privately insured or who no longer resides in California.
(B)Active participants means an individual who is an elective client, or who has a CARE plan or CARE agreement.
(b)County behavioral health agencies and any other state or local governmental entity, as identified by the department, shall provide data related to the CARE Act participants, services, and supports to the department. The department shall determine the data measures and specifications, and shall publish them via guidance issues pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 5984.
(c)Each county behavioral health department and any other state and local governmental entity, as identified by the department, shall provide the required data to the department, in a format and frequency as directed by the department.
(d)(1)In consultation with the Judicial Council, the department shall develop an annual reporting schedule for the submission of CARE Act data from the trial courts.
(2)Data from the trial courts shall be submitted to the Judicial Council, which shall aggregate the data and submit it to the department consistent with the reporting schedule developed pursuant to paragraph (1).
(3)On an annual basis to be determined by the Judicial Council and consistent with the annual reporting schedule developed pursuant to paragraph (1), the trial courts shall report to the Judicial Council the following data related to CARE Act petitions:
(A)The number of petitions submitted pursuant to Section 5975.
(B)The number of initial appearance hearings on the petition held pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 5977.
(C)The total number of hearings held pursuant to this part.
(D)The total number of CARE plans ordered and CARE agreements approved.
(E)The total number of court petitions dismissed, as reported by the Judicial Council.
(e)The annual report shall include process measures to examine the scope of impact and monitor the performance of CARE Act model implementation. The measures and reporting requirements shall be developed by the department in consultation with county behavioral health agencies. The report shall include trial court petition data pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (d) and, to the extent administrative data is available, all of the following information compiled from county behavioral health departments and courts:
(1)The demographics of all participants, including, but not limited to, the age, sex, race, ethnicity, disability, languages spoken, sexual orientation, gender identity, housing status, veteran status, immigration status, health coverage status, including Medi-Cal enrollment status, information related to CARE criteria outlined in Section 5972, and county of residence.
(2)The petitioners relationship to the CARE Act respondent as defined in Section 5974.
(3)The services and supports ordered, the services and supports provided, and the services and supports ordered but not provided to all active and former participants.
(4)The housing placements of all active and former participants. Placements include, but are not limited to, transition to a higher level of care, independent living in the persons own house or apartment, community-based housing, community-based housing with services, shelter, and no housing.
(5)Treatments continued and terminated of all active and former participants.
(6)Substance use disorder rates and rates of treatment among all active and former participants.
(7)Detentions and other Lanterman-Petris-Short Act involvement for all active and former participants.
(8)Criminal justice involvement of all active and former participants.
(9)Deaths among all active and former participants, along with the cause of death.
(10)Type, format, and frequency of outreach and engagement activities provided by a county behavioral health agency to engage an individual who is the subject of a referral or petition, including interactions about the individuals eligible or likely to be eligible and outcomes of these efforts.
(11)In consultation with the department and county behavioral health departments, the number, rates, and trends of contacts made to the county behavioral health agency about individuals eligible or likely to be eligible for the CARE process, including outcomes of those contacts.
(12)The number, rates, and source of referrals to county behavioral health departments, including, but not limited to, referrals resulting in a petition or reason for not filing a petition, length of time from referral to outcome, and services provided for those engaged voluntarily without a petition.
(13)The number, rates, and trends of petitions resulting in dismissal and hearings.
(14)Information on petition dispositions, including, but not limited to, disposition recommendations and the number of days from petition to disposition.
(15)The number, rates, and trends of supporters.
(16)The number, rates, and trends of approved CARE agreements.
(17)The number, rates, and trends of ordered and completed CARE plans.
(18)Statistics on the services and supports, including court orders for stabilizing medications.
(19)The rates of adherence to medication.
(20)The number, rates, and trends of psychiatric advance directives created for active participants.
(21)The number, rates, and trends of developed graduation plans.
(22)Outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of the CARE Act model, such as improvement in housing status, including gaining and maintaining housing, reductions in emergency department visits and inpatient hospitalizations, reductions in law enforcement encounters and incarceration, reductions in involuntary treatment and conservatorship, and reductions in substance use.
(23)A health equity assessment of the CARE Act to identify demographic disparities based on demographic data in paragraph (1), and to inform disparity reduction efforts.
(24)Data regarding referrals made pursuant to Section 5978.1, as part of the CARE Act.
(f)(1)The report shall include, at a minimum, information on the effectiveness of the CARE Act model in improving outcomes and reducing disparities, homelessness, criminal justice involvement, conservatorships, and hospitalization of participants. The annual report shall include process measures to examine the scope of impact and monitor the performance of CARE Act model implementation, such as the number and source of petitions filed for CARE Court; the number, rates, and trends of petitions resulting in dismissal and hearings; the number, rates, and trends of supporters; the number, rates, and trends of voluntary CARE agreements; the number, rates, and trends of ordered and completed CARE plans; the services and supports included in CARE plans, including court orders for stabilizing medications; the rates of adherence to medication; the number, rates, and trends of psychiatric advance directives; and the number, rates, and trends of developed graduation plans. The report shall include outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of the CARE Act model, such as improvement in housing status, including gaining and maintaining housing; reductions in emergency department visits and inpatient hospitalizations; reductions in law enforcement encounters and incarceration; reductions in involuntary treatment and conservatorship; and reductions in substance use. The annual report shall examine these data through the lens of health equity to identify racial, ethnic, and other demographic disparities and inform disparity reduction efforts.
(2)Data shall be stratified by age, sex, race, ethnicity, languages spoken, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, housing status, veteran status, immigration status, health coverage source, and county, to the extent statistically relevant data is available.
(g)The outcomes shall be presented to relevant state oversight bodies, including, but not limited to, the California Interagency Council on Homelessness.
(h)(1)Beginning in 2026, the department shall include in its annual CARE Act report quantitative, deidentified information concerning the operation of this part.
(2)Based on information provided to the department in a form and manner specified by the department, in consultation with the Judicial Council and county behavioral health departments, in accordance with subdivision (b) of Section 5984, the report shall include all of the following information, aggregated by county, compiled from county behavioral health departments, courts, and the department, depending on the source:
(A)The number of contacts to the county behavioral health department about individuals eligible or likely to be eligible for the CARE process, including outcome of contacts.
(B)The number of CARE petitions filed with the superior court.
(C)The petitioner type for each petition filed with the superior court.
(D)Disposition of each petition filed with the superior court.
(E)The number of days between filing each petition and the petitions disposition.
(F)Demographic information of each CARE Act participant or potentially eligible CARE Act participant, including, but not limited to, age, sex, race, ethnicity, disability, languages spoken, sexual orientation, gender identity, housing status, veteran status, immigration status, health coverage status, including Medi-Cal enrollment status, information related to CARE criteria outlined in Section 5972, and county of residence, to the extent administrative data is available and statistically relevant.
(G)The number of referrals of individuals in conservatorship proceedings made pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 5978, including the disposition of each referral.
(H)The number of referrals made pursuant to Section 5978.1, including the disposition of each referral.
(i)Information publicly released or published pursuant to this part shall not contain data that may lead to the identification of participants or petitioners or information that would otherwise allow an individual to link the published information to a specific person. Data published by the department shall be deidentified in compliance with Section 164.514(a) and (b) of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
SEC. 10.If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
SEC. 11.This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:The CARE Act took effect in October 2023, and therefore important changes to the act must take effect immediately to ensure the CARE Acts success in providing timely assistance to respondents.(a)If the defendant is found mentally competent, the criminal process shall resume, and the trial on the offense charged or hearing on the alleged violation shall proceed.
(b)If the defendant is found mentally incompetent, the trial, judgment, or hearing on the alleged violation shall be suspended and the court shall, after notice to the defendant, defense counsel, and the prosecution, hold a hearing to determine whether to do one or more of the following:
(1)(A)(i)Conduct a hearing, pursuant to Chapter 2.8A (commencing with Section 1001.35) of Title 6, and, if the court deems the defendant eligible and suitable, grant diversion pursuant to Section 1001.36 for a period not to exceed one year from the date the individual is accepted into diversion or the maximum term of imprisonment provided by law for the most serious offense charged in the misdemeanor complaint, whichever is shorter.
(ii)Notwithstanding any other law, including Section 23640 of the Vehicle Code, a misdemeanor offense for which a defendant may be placed in a mental health diversion program in accordance with this section includes a misdemeanor violation of Section 23152 or 23153 of the Vehicle Code. However, this section does not limit the authority of the Department of Motor Vehicles to take administrative action concerning the driving privileges of a person arrested for a violation of Section 23152 or 23153 of the Vehicle Code.
(B)Any hearing to determine eligibility and suitability for diversion shall be held no later than 30 days after the finding of incompetence. If the hearing is delayed beyond 30 days, the court shall order the defendant to be released on their own recognizance pending the hearing.
(C)If the defendant performs satisfactorily on diversion pursuant to this section, at the end of the period of diversion, the court shall dismiss the criminal charges that were the subject of the criminal proceedings at the time of the initial diversion.
(2)Refer the defendant to the CARE Act court pursuant to Section 5978 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, if the defendant or counsel for the defendant agrees to the referral and the court has reason to believe that the defendant may be eligible for the CARE program. The CARE Act court shall hold a hearing to determine eligibility for the CARE program within 30 court days after the date of the referral. If the hearing is delayed beyond 30 court days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in a county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing. If the defendant is accepted into the CARE program, the CARE Act court shall notify the criminal court of the acceptance, and the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 six months after the date of the referral to the CARE program, unless the defendants case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that six-month time period. If the defendant is not accepted into the CARE program or if the CARE Act court refers the defendant back to criminal court before the expiration of the six-month time period, the court shall proceed as provided in paragraph (1). Except as provided in this section and Sections 5978 and 5978.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, this paragraph does not alter the confidential nature of CARE program proceedings.
(c)If the court finds the defendant ineligible or unsuitable for diversion based on the circumstances set forth in subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (g) of Section 1001.36, the court shall, after notice to the defendant, defense counsel, and the prosecution, hold a hearing to determine which one of the following actions the court will take:
(1)Order modification of an existing mental health diversion treatment plan in accordance with a recommendation from the treatment provider.
(2)Refer the defendant to assisted outpatient treatment pursuant to Section 5346 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. A referral to assisted outpatient treatment may only occur in a county where services are available pursuant to Section 5348 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, and the agency agrees to accept responsibility for treatment of the defendant. A hearing to determine eligibility for assisted outpatient treatment shall be held within 45 days after the finding of incompetency. If the hearing is delayed beyond 45 days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing. If the defendant is accepted into assisted outpatient treatment, the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 six months after the date of the referral to assisted outpatient treatment, unless the defendants case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that time period. This section does not alter the confidential nature of assisted outpatient treatment.
(3)Refer the defendant to the county conservatorship investigator in the county of commitment for possible conservatorship proceedings for the defendant pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 5350) of Part 1 of Division 5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. A defendant shall only be referred to the conservatorship investigator if, based on the opinion of a qualified mental health expert, the defendant appears to be gravely disabled, as defined in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (h) of Section 5008 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. Any hearings required in the conservatorship proceedings shall be held in the superior court in the county of commitment. The court shall transmit a copy of the order directing initiation of conservatorship proceedings to the county mental health director or the directors designee and shall notify the county mental health director or their designee of the outcome of the proceedings. Before establishing a conservatorship, the public guardian shall investigate all available alternatives to conservatorship pursuant to Section 5354 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. If a petition is not filed within 30 days of the referral, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending conservatorship proceedings. If the outcome of the conservatorship proceedings results in the filing of a petition for the establishment of a temporary or permanent conservatorship, the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 90 days after the date of the filing of the petition, unless the defendants case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that time period. This section does not alter the confidential nature of conservatorship proceedings.
(4)Refer the defendant to the CARE Act court pursuant to Section 5978 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. The CARE Act court shall hold a hearing to determine eligibility for the CARE program within 14 court days after the date of the referral. If the hearing is delayed beyond 14 court days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in a county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing. If the defendant is accepted into the CARE program, the CARE Act court shall notify the criminal court of the acceptance, and the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 six months after the date of the referral to the CARE program, unless the defendants case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that time period. Except as provided in this section and Sections 5978 and 5978.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, this paragraph does not alter the confidential nature of CARE program proceedings.
(5)If the defendant does not qualify for services pursuant to paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive, dismiss the charges.
(d)It is the intent of the Legislature that a defendant subject to the terms of this section receive mental health treatment in a treatment facility and not a jail. A term of four days will be deemed to have been served for every two days spent in actual custody against the maximum period of treatment pursuant to paragraphs (2) and (4) of subdivision (c) and paragraphs (1) and (2) of subdivision (b), if applicable. A defendant not in actual custody shall otherwise receive day for day credit against the term of treatment from the date the defendant is accepted into treatment in the event that the criminal charges have not previously been dismissed. Actual custody has the same meaning as in Section 4019.
(e)The county behavioral health agency and jail medical providers may share confidential medical records and other relevant information with the court, including, but not limited to, prior interactions with and treatment of the defendant, for the purpose of determining likelihood of eligibility for behavioral health services and programs pursuant to this section. The disclosure of information pursuant to this subdivision is subject to applicable state and federal privacy laws.
(f)This section shall apply only as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 1367.
(g)It is the intent of the Legislature that the court shall consider all treatment options as provided in this section prior to dismissing criminal charges. However, nothing in this section limits a courts discretion pursuant to Section 1385.
SEC. 2.Section 5971 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5971.Unless the context otherwise requires, the following definitions shall govern the construction of this part.
(a)CARE agreement means a voluntary settlement agreement entered into by the parties. A CARE agreement includes the same elements as a CARE plan to support the respondent in accessing community-based services and supports.
(b)CARE plan means an individualized, appropriate range of community-based services and supports, as set forth in this part, which include clinically appropriate behavioral health care and stabilization medications, housing, and other supportive services, as appropriate, pursuant to Section 5982.
(c)CARE process means the court and related proceedings to implement the CARE Act.
(d)Clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment means all both of the following:
(1)The persons condition is stable and not deteriorating.
(2)The person is likely to survive safely in the community without supervision. (3)(2)The person is currently engaged in treatment and managing symptoms through medication or other therapeutic interventions. Enrollment in treatment alone shall not be considered clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment.
(4)The persons mental health condition is not negatively impacting their ability to live safely within the community or current housing situation.(e)Counsel means the attorney representing the respondent, appointed pursuant to Section 5977, or chosen by the respondent, in CARE Act proceedings and matters related to CARE agreements and CARE plans. Representation of a respondent in these matters does not alter counsels obligations under the State Bar Act and the Rules of Professional Conduct, including subdivision (e) of Section 6068 of the Business and Professions Code and rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.
(f)County behavioral health agency means the local director of mental health services described in Section 5607, the local behavioral health director, or both as applicable, or their designee.
(g)Court-ordered evaluation means an evaluation ordered by a superior court pursuant to Section 5977.1.
(h)Department means the State Department of Health Care Services.
(i)Graduation plan means a voluntary agreement entered into by the parties at the end of the CARE program that includes a strategy to support a successful transition out of court jurisdiction and that may include a psychiatric advance directive. A graduation plan includes the same elements as a CARE plan to support the respondent in accessing community-based services and supports. The graduation plan shall not place additional requirements on the local government entities and is not enforceable by the court.
(j)Homeless outreach worker means a person who engages people experiencing homelessness to assess for unmet needs, offer information, services, or other assistance, or provide care coordination.
(k)Indian health care provider means a health care program operated by the Indian Health Service, an Indian tribe, a tribal organization, or urban Indian organization (I/T/U) as those terms are defined in Section 4 of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1603).
(l)Legal proceeding means any administrative, civil, or criminal proceeding, including, but not limited to, juvenile court proceedings and family court proceedings and services, and any form of alternative dispute resolution, including arbitration and mediation, except for the following:
(1)A proceeding under this part.
(2)A proceeding under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act described in paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 5979.
(3)A proceeding from which the respondent was referred to CARE Act proceedings as described in Section 5978.
(4)A disciplinary proceeding under Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 6000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code.
(5)An appeal from any of the proceedings identified in paragraphs (1) through to (4), inclusive.
(m)Licensed behavioral health professional means any either of the following:
(1)A licensed mental health professional, as defined in subdivision (j) of Section 4096.
(2)A person who has been granted a waiver of licensure requirements by the department pursuant to Section 5751.2.
(3)A nurse practitioner, as defined in Section 2835 of the Business and Professions Code.(4)A physician assistant, as defined in subdivision (d) of Section 3501 of the Business and Professions Code.(n)Parties means the petitioner, the respondent, the county behavioral health agency in the county where proceedings under this part are pending, and any local governmental entity added by the court pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 5977.1.
(o)Petitioner means the person who files the CARE Act petition with the court. Additionally, if the petitioner is a person listed in Section 5974 other than the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the petitioner shall have the right to file a petition with the court, but at the initial hearing the court shall substitute the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, of the county in which the proceedings are filed as petitioner. The original petitioner may, at the courts discretion and in furtherance of the interests of the respondent, retain rights as described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (6) of subdivision (b) of Section 5977.
(p)Psychiatric advance directive means a legal document, executed on a voluntary basis in accordance with the requirements for advance health care directives in Division 4.7 (commencing with Section 4600) of the Probate Code, by a person who has the capacity to make medical decisions, that allows a person with mental illness to protect their autonomy and ability to direct their own care by documenting their preferences for treatment in advance of a mental health crisis.
(q)Respondent means the person who is the subject of the petition for the CARE process.
(r)Stabilization medications means medications included in the CARE plan that primarily consist of antipsychotic medications to reduce symptoms of hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized thinking. Stabilization medications may be administered as long-acting injections if clinically indicated. Stabilization medications shall not be forcibly administered.
(s)Supporter means an adult designated by the respondent who assists the person who is the subject of the petition, which assistance may include supporting the person to understand, make, communicate, implement, or act on their own life decisions during the CARE process, including a CARE agreement, a CARE plan, and developing a graduation plan. A supporter shall not act independently.
SEC. 3.Section 5972 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5972.An individual shall qualify for the CARE process only if all of the following criteria are met:
(a)The person is 18 years of age or older.
(b)The person is currently experiencing a serious mental disorder, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 5600.3 and has a diagnosis identified in the disorder class: schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, or mood disorders bipolar I disorder with psychotic features, except psychosis related to current intoxication, as defined in the most current version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. This section does not establish respondent eligibility based upon a psychotic disorder that is due to a medical condition or is not primarily psychiatric in nature, including, but not limited to, physical health conditions such as traumatic brain injury, autism, dementia, or neurologic conditions. A person who has a current diagnosis of substance use disorder as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 1374.72 of the Health and Safety Code but who does not also meet the required criteria in this section shall not qualify for the CARE process.
(c)The person is not clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment.
(d)At least one of the following is true:
(1)The person is unlikely to survive safely in the community without supervision and the persons condition is substantially deteriorating.
(2)The person is in need of services and supports in order to prevent a relapse or deterioration that would be likely to result in grave disability or serious harm to the person or others, as used in Section 5150.
(e)Participation in a CARE plan or CARE agreement would be the least restrictive alternative necessary to ensure the persons recovery and stability.
(f)It is likely that the person will benefit from participation in a CARE plan or CARE agreement.
SEC. 4.Section 5975 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5975.The Judicial Council shall develop a mandatory form for use to file a CARE process petition with the court and any other forms necessary for the CARE process. The petition shall be signed under the penalty of perjury and contain all of the following:
(a)The name of the respondent and, if known, the respondents address.
(b)The petitioners relationship to the respondent.
(c)Facts that support the petitioners assertion that the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972.
(d)Either of the following:
(1)An affidavit of a licensed behavioral health professional, including, for purposes of this section only, nurse practitioners as defined in Section 2835 of the Business and Professions Code and physician assistants as defined in subdivision (d) of Section 3501 of the Business and Professions Code, stating that the licensed behavioral health professional or their designee has examined the respondent within 60 days of the submission of the petition, or has made multiple attempts to examine, but has not been successful in eliciting the cooperation of the respondent to submit to an examination, within 60 days of the petition, and that the licensed behavioral health professional had determined that the respondent meets, or has reason to believe, explained with specificity in the affidavit, that the respondent meets the diagnostic criteria for CARE proceedings.
(2)Evidence that the respondent was detained for a minimum of two intensive treatments pursuant to Article 4 (commencing with Section 5250) of Chapter 2 of Part 1, the most recent one within the previous 60 days. Evidence may include, but is not limited to, documentary evidence from the facility where the respondent was detained, or a signed declaration from the petitioner if the petitioner had personal knowledge of the detentions.
SEC. 4.SEC. 5.Section 5977 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5977.(a)(1)The court shall promptly review the petition to determine if the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972. The court may make a prima facie determination without conducting a hearing.
(2)If the court finds that the petitioner has not made a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, the court may dismiss the case and, if the court does so, it shall order that the dismissal is without prejudice, unless Section 5975.1 applies. Nothing other than Section 5975.1 prevents a petitioner whose petition was dismissed without prejudice from refiling the petition with amended information.
(3)If the court finds that the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, the court shall do one of the following:
(A)If the petitioner is the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the court shall do the following:
(i)Set the matter for an initial appearance on the petition within 14 court days, or concurrently conduct the initial appearance with the prima facie determination pursuant to clause (v) of this paragraph. days.
(ii)Appoint a qualified legal services project, as defined in Sections 6213 to 6214.5, inclusive, of the Business and Professions Code, to represent the respondent. If no legal services project has agreed to accept these appointments, a public defender or other counsel working in that capacity shall be appointed to represent the respondent.
(iii)Determine whether the petition includes all of the following information and, if it does not, order the county behavioral health agency to submit a written report with the court within 14 court days that includes all of the following:
(I)A determination as to whether the respondent meets, or is likely to meet, the criteria for the CARE process.
(II)The outcome of efforts made to voluntarily engage the respondent prior to the filing of the petition.
(III)Conclusions and recommendations about the respondents ability to voluntarily engage in services.
(iv)Order the county behavioral health agency to provide notice to the respondent, the appointed counsel, and the county behavioral health agency in the county where the respondent resides, if different from the county where the CARE process has commenced.
(v)If the requirements set forth in clauses (ii) to (iv), inclusive, of this subparagraph and all of the requirements of subdivision (b) are satisfied at the time of the prima facie determination, and the petitioner and respondent are both present and consent, the court may conduct the initial appearance concurrently with the prima facie determination.(B)If the petitioner is a person other than the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the court shall order a county agency, or their designee, as determined by the court, to investigate, as necessary, file a written report with the court as soon as practicable, but within 30 court days, and provide notice to the respondent and petitioner that a report has been ordered. Parties shall complete the investigation with appropriate urgency. The written report shall include all of the following:
(i)A determination as to whether the respondent meets, or is likely to meet, the criteria for the CARE process.
(ii)The outcome of efforts made to voluntarily engage the respondent during the report period.
(iii)Conclusions and recommendations about the respondents ability to voluntarily engage in services.
(iv)The information, including protected health information, necessary to support the determinations, conclusions, and recommendations in the report.
(4)If, upon a request by the county agency ordered to investigate and file a report under subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3), the court finds that the county agency is making progress to engage the respondent, the court may, in its discretion, grant the county agency no more than 30 additional days to continue to work with, engage, and enroll the individual in voluntary treatment and services. The county agency shall provide notice to the respondent and petitioner that an extension for filing a report has been granted.
(5)Upon receipt of the report described in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3), the court shall, within five days, take one of the following actions:
(A)If the court determines that voluntary engagement with the respondent is effective, and that the individual has enrolled or is likely to enroll in voluntary behavioral health treatment, the court shall dismiss the matter.
(B)If the court determines, based on the county agencys report, that the evidence does not support a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, the court shall dismiss the matter. This section shall not prevent a county behavioral health agency from continuing to voluntarily engage with a person not described in Section 5972 but who is in need of services and supports.
(C)If the court determines, based on the county agencys report, that the evidence does support a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, and engagement with the county agency was not effective, the court shall do all of the following:
(i)Set an initial appearance on the petition within 14 court days.
(ii)Appoint a qualified legal services project, as defined in Sections 6213 to 6214.5, inclusive, of the Business and Professions Code or, if no legal services project has agreed to accept these appointments, a public defender or other counsel working in that capacity to represent the respondent.
(iii)Order the county agency to provide notice of the initial appearance to the petitioner, the respondent, the appointed counsel, the county behavioral health agency in the county where the respondent resides, and, if different, the county where the CARE court proceedings have commenced.
(b)At the initial appearance on the petition, all of the following shall apply:
(1)The court shall permit the respondent to substitute their own counsel.
(2)Petitioner shall be present. If the petitioner is not present, the matter may be dismissed.
(3)Respondent may waive personal appearance and appear through counsel. If the respondent does not waive personal appearance and does not appear at the hearing, and the court makes a finding in open court that reasonable attempts to elicit the attendance of the respondent have failed, the court may conduct the hearing in the respondents absence if the court makes a finding in open court that conducting the hearing without the participation or presence of the respondent would be in the respondents best interest.
(4)A representative from the county behavioral health agency shall be present.
(5)If the respondent asserts that they are enrolled in a federally recognized Indian tribe or are receiving services from an Indian health care provider, a tribal court, or a tribal organization, a representative from the program, the tribe, or the tribal court shall be allowed to be present, subject to the consent of the respondent. The tribal representative shall be entitled to notice by the county of the initial appearance.
(6)(A)If the petitioner is a person other than the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the court shall issue an order relieving the original petitioner and appointing the director of the county behavioral health agency or their designee as the successor petitioner.
(B)If the original petitioner is described in subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 5974, all of the following apply:
(i)The original petitioner shall have the right to be present and make a statement at the initial hearing on the merits of the petition held pursuant to paragraph (7).
(ii)(I)Until July 1, 2025, the court may, in its discretion, assign ongoing rights of notice to the original petitioner.
(II)Commencing July 1, 2025, unless the court determines, either upon its own motion or upon the motion of the respondent, at any point in the proceedings, that it likely would be detrimental to the treatment or well-being of the respondent, the court shall provide ongoing notice of proceedings to the original petitioner throughout the CARE proceedings, including notice of when a continuance is granted or when a case is dismissed. If a continuance is granted, the notice shall provide a general reason for the continuance, including the absence of the respondent or one of the grounds pursuant to Rule 3.1332 of the California Rules of Court. If a case is dismissed, the notice shall specify the statutory basis for the dismissal. A notice pursuant to this clause shall not disclose any patient information that is protected under the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-191), the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (Part 2.6 (commencing with Section 56) of Division 1 of the Civil Code), or this act, without the respondents consent.
(iii)To the extent that the respondent consents, the court may allow the original petitioner to participate in the respondents CARE proceedings.
(iv)The original petitioner may file a new petition with the court, pursuant to Section 5974, if the matter is dismissed and there is a change in circumstances.
(C)If the original petitioner is not described in subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 5974, the court shall not assign ongoing rights to the original petitioner, other than the right to be present and make a statement at the hearing on the merits of the petition held pursuant to paragraph (7).
(7)(A)The court shall set a hearing on the merits of the petition within 10 days, at which time the court shall determine whether, by clear and convincing evidence, the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972. In making this determination, the court shall consider all evidence properly before it, including any report from the county behavioral health agency ordered pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) and any additional admissible evidence presented by the parties, including the petition submitted and any statement given by the original petitioner. A licensed behavioral health professional may testify as an expert concerning whether the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972 provided that the court finds that the professional has special knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education sufficient to qualify as an expert under Section 720 of the Evidence Code.
(B)The hearing on the merits of the petition may be conducted concurrently with the initial appearance upon stipulation of the successor petitioner and the respondent, subject to the approval by the court.
(c)(1)If, at the hearing on the merits of the petition, the court finds there is not clear and convincing evidence that the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972, the court shall dismiss the case without prejudice, unless the court makes a finding, in open court, that the original petitioners filing was not in good faith, in which case the dismissal shall be with prejudice.
(2)If, at the hearing on the merits of the petition, the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency to work with the respondent, the respondents counsel, and the supporter to engage the respondent in behavioral health treatment and attempt to enter into a CARE agreement. The court shall set a case management hearing within 14 days.
(3)If the respondent is enrolled in a federally recognized Indian tribe, the county shall provide notice of the case management hearing to the tribe, subject to the consent of the respondent.
(d)The following shall apply to any written report submitted by a county behavioral health agency to the court pursuant to this section:
(1)The report is confidential and not subject to disclosure or inspection under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(2)The report is inadmissible in any subsequent legal proceeding, except upon motion of the respondent in that subsequent legal proceeding.
(3)The report shall be confidential pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 5976.5.
(4)This subdivision shall not affect the applicability of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 5977.1, make admissible any evidence that is not otherwise admissible, or permit a witness to base an opinion on any matter that is not a proper basis for such an opinion. The admission or exclusion of evidence shall be pursuant to the rules of evidence established by the Evidence Code, including, but not limited to, Section 352 of the Evidence Code, and by judicial decision.
SEC. 5.SEC. 6.Section 5977.1 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5977.1.(a)(1)At the case management hearing, the court shall hear evidence as to whether the parties have entered, or are likely to enter, into a CARE agreement.
(2)If the court finds that the parties have entered, or are likely to enter, into a CARE agreement, the court shall do one of the following:
(A)Approve the terms of the CARE agreement or modify the terms of the CARE agreement and approve the agreement as modified by the court, and continue the matter and set a progress hearing for 60 days.
(B)Continue the matter for 14 days to allow the parties additional time to enter into a CARE agreement, upon stipulation of the parties.
(3)Nothing in this subdivision shall prohibit the parties from agreeing to, and the court from approving, amendments to the CARE agreement.
(4)The court may, in its discretion, call additional progress hearings beyond the hearing set at 60 days, for the duration of the CARE agreement.
(b)If the court finds that the parties have not entered into a CARE agreement, and are not likely to enter into a CARE agreement, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency, through a licensed behavioral health professional, to conduct a clinical evaluation of the respondent, unless there is an existing clinical evaluation of the respondent completed within the last 30 days and the parties stipulate to the use of that evaluation. The evaluation shall address, at a minimum, the following:
(1)A clinical diagnosis of the respondent.
(2)Whether the respondent has the legal capacity to give informed consent regarding psychotropic medication.
(3)Any other information as ordered by the court or that the licensed behavioral health professional conducting the evaluation determines would help the court make future informed decisions about the appropriate care and services the respondent should receive.
(4)An analysis of recommended services, programs, housing, medications, and interventions that support the recovery and stability of the respondent.
(c)(1)The court shall set a clinical evaluation hearing to review the evaluation within 21 days. The court shall order the county to file the evaluation with the court and provide the evaluation to the respondents counsel no later than five days prior to the scheduled clinical evaluation hearing. The clinical evaluation hearing may be continued for a maximum of 14 days upon stipulation of the respondent and the county behavioral health agency, unless there is good cause for a longer extension.
(2)At the clinical evaluation review hearing, the court shall review the evaluation and other evidence from the county behavioral health agency and the respondent. The county behavioral health agency and the respondent may present evidence and call witnesses, including the person who conducted the evaluation. Only relevant and admissible evidence that fully complies with the rules of evidence may be considered by the court.
(3)At the conclusion of the hearing, the court shall determine whether the respondent, by clear and convincing evidence, meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972 and make orders as follows:
(A)If the court finds that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency, the respondent, and the respondents counsel and supporter to jointly develop a CARE plan within 14 days.
(B)If the court does not find that clear and convincing evidence establishes that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, the court shall dismiss the petition.
(4)If the respondent is a self-identified American Indian or Alaska Native individual, as defined in Sections 1603(13), 1603(28), and 1679(a) of Title 25 of the United States Code, has been determined eligible as an Indian under Section 136.12 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, or is currently receiving services from an Indian health care provider or tribal court, the county behavioral health agency shall use its best efforts to meaningfully consult with and incorporate the Indian health care provider or tribal court available to the respondent to develop the CARE plan.
(5)The evaluation and all reports, documents, and filings submitted to the court shall be confidential.
(6)The date for the hearing to review and consider approval of the proposed CARE plan shall be set not more than 14 days from the date of the order to develop a CARE plan, unless the court finds good cause for an extension. The party requesting an extension of time for the CARE plan review hearing shall provide notice to the opposing party and their counsel of the request for extension of time, and the courts order if the request is granted.
(d)(1)At the CARE plan review hearing, the parties shall present their plan or plans to the court. The county behavioral health agency or the respondent, or both, may present a proposed CARE plan.
(2)After consideration of the plans proposed by the parties, the court shall adopt the elements of a CARE plan that support the recovery and stability of the respondent. The court may issue any orders necessary to support the respondent in accessing appropriate services and supports, including prioritization for those services and supports, subject to applicable laws and available funding pursuant to Section 5982. These orders shall constitute the CARE plan and may be amended.
(3)A court may order medication if it finds, upon review of the court-ordered evaluation and hearing from the parties, that, by clear and convincing evidence, the respondent lacks the capacity to give informed consent to the administration of medically necessary stabilization medication. To the extent the court orders medically necessary stabilization medication, the medication shall not be forcibly administered and the respondents failure to comply with a medication order shall not result in a penalty, including, but not limited to, contempt or termination of the CARE plan pursuant to Section 5979.
(4)If the proposed CARE plan includes services and supports, such as housing, provided directly or indirectly through another local governmental entity, that local entity may agree to provide the service or support, or the court may consider a motion by either of the parties to add the local entity as a party to the CARE proceeding. If the local entity agrees to provide the service or support, it may request to be added as a party by the court.
(5)If, after presentation of the CARE plan or plans, the court determines that additional information is needed, including from a licensed behavioral health professional, the court shall order a supplemental report to be filed by the county behavioral health agency for which the court may grant a continuance of no more than 14 days, unless there is good cause for a longer extension.
(6)If there is no CARE plan because the parties have not had sufficient time to complete it, the court may grant a continuance of no more than 14 days, unless there is good cause for a longer extension.
(7)This subdivision does not prohibit the parties from agreeing to, and the court from approving, amendments to the CARE plan. The court may also approve amendments to the CARE plan upon the finding that those amendments are necessary to support the respondent in accessing appropriate services and supports, following a hearing on the issue.
(e)The issuance of an order approving a CARE plan pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) begins the CARE process timeline, which shall not exceed one year.
SEC. 6.SEC. 7.Section 5977.3 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5977.3.(a)(1)In the 11th month of the process timeline, the court shall hold a one-year status hearing. Not fewer than five court days prior to the one-year status hearing, the county behavioral health agency shall file a report with the court and shall serve the report on the respondent and the respondents counsel and supporter. The report shall include the following information:
(A)The progress that the respondent has made on the CARE plan, including a final assessment of the respondents stability.
(B)What services and supports in the CARE plan were provided, and what services and supports were not provided, over the life of the program.
(C)Any issues the respondent expressed or exhibited in adhering to the CARE plan.
(D)Recommendations for next steps, including what ongoing and additional services would benefit the respondent that the county behavioral health agency can facilitate or provide.
(2)At an evidentiary hearing, the respondent shall be permitted to respond to the report submitted by the county behavioral health agency and to the county behavioral health agencys testimony. Respondent The respondent shall be permitted to introduce their own information and recommendations. The respondent shall have the right at the hearing to call witnesses and to present evidence as to whether the respondent agrees with the report. The respondent may request either to be graduated from the program or to remain in the program.
(3)The court shall issue an order as follows:
(A)If the respondent requests to be graduated from the program, and the court approves this request, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency and the respondent to work jointly on a voluntary graduation plan and the court shall schedule a hearing in the 12th month after adoption of the CARE plan for presentation of the graduation plan. The court shall review the graduation plan and recite the terms in open court. The graduation plan shall not place additional requirements on local governmental entities and is not enforceable by the court, except that the graduation plan may, at the respondents election, include a psychiatric advance directive, which shall have the force of law. Upon completion of the hearing, the respondent shall be officially graduated from the program.
(B)If the respondent requests to remain in the CARE process, the respondent may request any amount of time, up to and including one additional year. The court may approve the request and thereby permit the ongoing voluntary participation of the respondent if the court finds both of the following:
(i)The respondent did not successfully complete the CARE plan.
(ii)The respondent would benefit from continuation of the CARE plan.
(C)The court shall issue an order permitting the respondent to continue in the CARE plan or denying the respondents request to remain in the CARE plan, and state its reasons in open court.
(b)The respondent may be involuntarily reappointed to the program only if the court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that all of the following conditions apply:
(1)The respondent did not successfully complete the CARE process.
(2)All services and supports required through the CARE process were provided to the respondent.
(3)The respondent would benefit from continuation in the CARE process.
(4)The respondent currently meets the requirements in Section 5972.
(c)A respondent may only be reappointed to the CARE process once, for up to one additional year.
SEC. 7.SEC. 8.Section 5978 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5978.(a)A court may refer an individual from assisted outpatient treatment, from conservatorship proceedings pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 5350) of Part 1 of Division 5 (LPS conservatorship), from misdemeanor proceedings pursuant to Section 1370.01 of the Penal Code, or from felony proceedings pursuant to Section 1370 of the Penal Code to the CARE Act court.
(b) The CARE Act court may consider a referral made pursuant to this section to be a petition satisfying the requirements of paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 5977 if both of the following conditions are met:
(1)The referral contains information sufficient to otherwise satisfy the petition requirements in Section 5975.
(2)The information included in the referral makes a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972.
(c)If the CARE Act court elects to consider a referral to be a petition pursuant to subdivision (b), the CARE Act court shall notify the referring court that the referral has been accepted as a petition for CARE Act proceedings.
(d)If the CARE Act court does not elect to consider a referral to be a petition pursuant to subdivision (b), the CARE Act court shall order the appropriate petitioner candidate to do the following within 14 court days:
(1)Complete an investigation to determine whether to a file a petition on behalf of the referred individual.
(2)Notify the referring court whether it intends to file a CARE Act petition on behalf of the referred individual.
(e)If the appropriate petitioner candidate notifies the CARE Act court that it requires additional time to complete its investigation pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the CARE Act court may grant an extension of up to 30 court days.
(f)For purposes of this section, appropriate petitioner candidate means:
(1)For referrals from assisted outpatient treatment or from misdemeanor proceedings, the county behavioral health director or their designee.
(2)For referrals from conservatorship proceedings, the conservator or proposed conservator.
SEC. 8.SEC. 9.Section 5985 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5985.(a)(1)The department shall develop, in consultation with county behavioral health agencies, other relevant state or local government entities, disability rights groups, individuals with lived experience, families, counsel, racial justice experts, and other appropriate stakeholders, an annual CARE Act report. The department shall post the annual report on its internet website.
(2)The department, in consultation with county behavioral health agencies and courts, shall specify the length of time that data on former participants shall be reported pursuant to subdivision (e), which shall be a minimum of 12 months after completion of and a maximum of 36 months following engagement in CARE Act elective services, a CARE agreement, or CARE plan.
(3)For the purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(A)Former participant means an individual who enters into CARE Act elective services, a CARE agreement, or a CARE plan, but who has either graduated from CARE, or for whom CARE Act proceedings were dismissed or terminated. Counties shall not be responsible for reporting on any individual who is privately insured or who no longer resides in California.
(B)Active participants means an individual who is an elective client, or who has a CARE plan or CARE agreement.
(b)County behavioral health agencies and any other state or local governmental entity, as identified by the department, shall provide data related to the CARE Act participants, services, and supports to the department. The department shall determine the data measures and specifications, and shall publish them via guidance issues pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 5984.
(c)Each county behavioral health department and any other state and local governmental entity, as identified by the department, shall provide the required data to the department, in a format and frequency as directed by the department.
(d)(1)In consultation with the Judicial Council, the department shall develop an annual reporting schedule for the submission of CARE Act data from the trial courts.
(2)Data from the trial courts shall be submitted to the Judicial Council, which shall aggregate the data and submit it to the department consistent with the reporting schedule developed pursuant to paragraph (1).
(3)On an annual basis to be determined by the Judicial Council and consistent with the annual reporting schedule developed pursuant to paragraph (1), the trial courts shall report to the Judicial Council the following data related to CARE Act petitions:
(A)The number of petitions submitted pursuant to Section 5975.
(B)The number of initial appearance hearings on the petition held pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 5977.
(C)The total number of hearings held pursuant to this part.
(D)The total number of CARE plans ordered and CARE agreements approved.
(E)The total number of court petitions dismissed, as reported by the Judicial Council.
(e)The annual report shall include process measures to examine the scope of impact and monitor the performance of CARE Act model implementation. The measures and reporting requirements shall be developed by the department in consultation with county behavioral health agencies. The report shall include trial court petition data pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (d) and, to the extent administrative data is available, all of the following information compiled from county behavioral health departments and courts:
(1)The demographics of all participants, including, but not limited to, the age, sex, race, ethnicity, disability, languages spoken, sexual orientation, gender identity, housing status, veteran status, immigration status, health coverage status, including Medi-Cal enrollment status, information related to CARE criteria outlined in Section 5972, and county of residence.
(2)The petitioners relationship to the CARE Act respondent as defined in Section 5974.
(3)The services and supports ordered, the services and supports provided, and the services and supports ordered but not provided to all active and former participants.
(4)The housing placements of all active and former participants. Placements include, but are not limited to, transition to a higher level of care, independent living in the persons own house or apartment, community-based housing, community-based housing with services, shelter, and no housing.
(5)Treatments continued and terminated of all active and former participants.
(6)Substance use disorder rates and rates of treatment among all active and former participants.
(7)Detentions and other Lanterman-Petris-Short Act involvement for all active and former participants.
(8)Criminal justice involvement of all active and former participants.
(9)Deaths among all active and former participants, along with the cause of death.
(10)Type, format, and frequency of outreach and engagement activities provided by a county behavioral health agency to engage an individual who is the subject of a referral or petition, including interactions about the individuals eligible or likely to be eligible and outcomes of these efforts.
(11)In consultation with the department and county behavioral health departments, the number, rates, and trends of contacts made to the county behavioral health agency about individuals eligible or likely to be eligible for the CARE process, including outcomes of those contacts.
(12)The number, rates, and source of referrals to county behavioral health departments, including, but not limited to, referrals resulting in a petition or reason for not filing a petition, length of time from referral to outcome, and services provided for those engaged voluntarily without a petition.
(13)The number, rates, and trends of petitions resulting in dismissal and hearings.
(14)Information on petition dispositions, including, but not limited to, disposition recommendations and the number of days from petition to disposition.
(15)The number, rates, and trends of supporters.
(16)The number, rates, and trends of approved CARE agreements.
(17)The number, rates, and trends of ordered and completed CARE plans.
(18)Statistics on the services and supports, including court orders for stabilizing medications.
(19)The rates of adherence to medication.
(20)The number, rates, and trends of psychiatric advance directives created for active participants.
(21)The number, rates, and trends of developed graduation plans.
(22)Outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of the CARE Act model, such as improvement in housing status, including gaining and maintaining housing, reductions in emergency department visits and inpatient hospitalizations, reductions in law enforcement encounters and incarceration, reductions in involuntary treatment and conservatorship, and reductions in substance use.
(23)A health equity assessment of the CARE Act to identify demographic disparities based on demographic data in paragraph (1), and to inform disparity reduction efforts.
(24)Data regarding referrals made pursuant to Section 5978.1, as part of the CARE Act.
(f)(1)The report shall include, at a minimum, information on the effectiveness of the CARE Act model in improving outcomes and reducing disparities, homelessness, criminal justice involvement, conservatorships, and hospitalization of participants. The annual report shall include process measures to examine the scope of impact and monitor the performance of CARE Act model implementation, such as the number and source of petitions filed for CARE Court; the number, rates, and trends of petitions resulting in dismissal and hearings; the number, rates, and trends of supporters; the number, rates, and trends of voluntary CARE agreements; the number, rates, and trends of ordered and completed CARE plans; the services and supports included in CARE plans, including court orders for stabilizing medications; the rates of adherence to medication; the number, rates, and trends of psychiatric advance directives; and the number, rates, and trends of developed graduation plans. The report shall include outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of the CARE Act model, such as improvement in housing status, including gaining and maintaining housing; reductions in emergency department visits and inpatient hospitalizations; reductions in law enforcement encounters and incarceration; reductions in involuntary treatment and conservatorship; and reductions in substance use. The annual report shall examine these data through the lens of health equity to identify racial, ethnic, and other demographic disparities and inform disparity reduction efforts.
(2)Data shall be stratified by age, sex, race, ethnicity, languages spoken, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, housing status, veteran status, immigration status, health coverage source, and county, to the extent statistically relevant data is available.
(g)The outcomes shall be presented to relevant state oversight bodies, including, but not limited to, the California Interagency Council on Homelessness.
(h)(1)Beginning in 2026, the department shall include in its annual CARE Act report quantitative, deidentified information concerning the operation of this part.
(2)Based on information provided to the department in a form and manner specified by the department, in consultation with the Judicial Council and county behavioral health departments, in accordance with subdivision (b) of Section 5984, the report shall include all of the following information, aggregated by county, compiled from county behavioral health departments, courts, and the department, depending on the source:
(A)The number of contacts to the county behavioral health department about individuals eligible or likely to be eligible for the CARE process, including outcome of contacts.
(B)The number of CARE petitions filed with the superior court.
(C)The petitioner type for each petition filed with the superior court.
(D)Disposition of each petition filed with the superior court.
(E)The number of days between filing each petition and the petitions disposition.
(F)Demographic information of each CARE Act participant or potentially eligible CARE Act participant, including, but not limited to, age, sex, race, ethnicity, disability, languages spoken, sexual orientation, gender identity, housing status, veteran status, immigration status, health coverage status, including Medi-Cal enrollment status, information related to CARE criteria outlined in Section 5972, and county of residence, to the extent administrative data is available and statistically relevant.
(G)The number of referrals of individuals in conservatorship proceedings made pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 5978, including the disposition of each referral.
(H)The number of referrals made pursuant to Section 5978.1, including the disposition of each referral.
(i)Information publicly released or published pursuant to this part shall not contain data that may lead to the identification of participants or petitioners or information that would otherwise allow an individual to link the published information to a specific person. Data published by the department shall be deidentified in compliance with Section 164.514(a) and (b) of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
SEC. 9.SEC. 10.If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
SEC. 10.SEC. 11.This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
The CARE Act took effect in October 2023, and therefore important changes to the act must take effect immediately to ensure the CARE Acts success in providing timely assistance to respondents.
(a)If the defendant is found mentally competent, the criminal process shall resume, and the trial on the offense charged or hearing on the alleged violation shall proceed.
(b)(1)(A)If the defendant is found mentally incompetent, the trial, judgment, or hearing on the alleged violation shall be suspended and the court shall conduct a hearing, pursuant to Chapter 2.8A (commencing with Section 1001.35) of Title 6, and, if the court deems the defendant eligible, grant diversion pursuant to Section 1001.36 for a period not to exceed one year from the date the individual is accepted into diversion or the maximum term of imprisonment provided by law for the most serious offense charged in the misdemeanor complaint, whichever is shorter. shall, after notice to the defendant, defense counsel, and the prosecution, hold a hearing to determine whether to do one or more of the following:
(1)(A)(i)Conduct a hearing, pursuant to Chapter 2.8A (commencing with Section 1001.35) of Title 6, and, if the court deems the defendant eligible and suitable, grant diversion pursuant to Section 1001.36 for a period not to exceed one year from the date the individual is accepted into diversion or the maximum term of imprisonment provided by law for the most serious offense charged in the misdemeanor complaint, whichever is shorter.
(B)(ii)Notwithstanding any other law, including Section 23640 of the Vehicle Code, a misdemeanor offense for which a defendant may be placed in a mental health diversion program in accordance with this section includes a misdemeanor violation of Section 23152 or 23153 of the Vehicle Code. However, this section does not limit the authority of the Department of Motor Vehicles to take administrative action concerning the driving privileges of a person arrested for a violation of Section 23152 or 23153 of the Vehicle Code.
(2)The(B)Any hearing to determine eligibility and suitability for diversion shall be held no later than 30 days after the finding of incompetence. If the hearing is delayed beyond 30 days, the court shall order the defendant to be released on their own recognizance pending the hearing.
(3)(C)If the defendant performs satisfactorily on diversion pursuant to this section, at the end of the period of diversion, the court shall dismiss the criminal charges that were the subject of the criminal proceedings at the time of the initial diversion.
(2)Refer the defendant to the CARE Act court pursuant to Section 5978 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, if the court has reason to believe that the defendant may be eligible for the CARE program. The CARE Act court shall hold a hearing to determine eligibility for the CARE program within 30 court days after the date of the referral. If the hearing is delayed beyond 30 court days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in a county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing. If the defendant is accepted into the CARE program, the CARE Act court shall notify the criminal court of the acceptance, and the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 six months after the date of the referral to the CARE program, unless the defendants case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that six-month time period. Except as provided in this section and Sections 5978 and 5978.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, this paragraph does not alter the confidential nature of CARE program proceedings.
(4)(c)If the court finds the defendant ineligible or unsuitable for diversion based on the circumstances set forth in subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (g) of Section 1001.36, the court shall, after notice to the defendant, defense counsel, and the prosecution, hold a hearing to determine which one of the following actions the court will take:
(A)(1)Order modification of an existing mental health diversion treatment plan in accordance with a recommendation from the treatment provider.
(B)(2)Refer the defendant to assisted outpatient treatment pursuant to Section 5346 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. A referral to assisted outpatient treatment may only occur in a county where services are available pursuant to Section 5348 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, and the agency agrees to accept responsibility for treatment of the defendant. A hearing to determine eligibility for assisted outpatient treatment shall be held within 45 days after the finding of incompetency. If the hearing is delayed beyond 45 days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing. If the defendant is accepted into assisted outpatient treatment, the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 six months after the date of the referral to assisted outpatient treatment, unless the defendants case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that time period. This section does not alter the confidential nature of assisted outpatient treatment.
(C)(3)Refer the defendant to the county conservatorship investigator in the county of commitment for possible conservatorship proceedings for the defendant pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 5350) of Part 1 of Division 5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. A defendant shall only be referred to the conservatorship investigator if, based on the opinion of a qualified mental health expert, the defendant appears to be gravely disabled, as defined in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (h) of Section 5008 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. Any hearings required in the conservatorship proceedings shall be held in the superior court in the county of commitment. The court shall transmit a copy of the order directing initiation of conservatorship proceedings to the county mental health director or the directors designee and shall notify the county mental health director or their designee of the outcome of the proceedings. Before establishing a conservatorship, the public guardian shall investigate all available alternatives to conservatorship pursuant to Section 5354 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. If a petition is not filed within 30 days of the referral, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending conservatorship proceedings. If the outcome of the conservatorship proceedings results in the filing of a petition for the establishment of a temporary or permanent conservatorship, the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 90 days after the date of the filing of the petition, unless the defendants case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that time period. This section does not alter the confidential nature of conservatorship proceedings.
(D)(4)Refer the defendant to the CARE program pursuant to Section 5978 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. A hearing to determine eligibility for CARE shall be held within 14 court days after the date on which the petition for the referral is filed. If the hearing is delayed beyond 14 court days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing. If the defendant is accepted into CARE, the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 six months after the date of the referral to CARE, unless the defendants case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that time period. This section does not alter the confidential nature of CARE program proceedings. Act court pursuant to Section 5978 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. The CARE Act court shall hold a hearing to determine eligibility for the CARE program within 14 court days after the date of the referral. If the hearing is delayed beyond 14 court days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in a county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing. If the defendant is accepted into the CARE program, the CARE Act court shall notify the criminal court of the acceptance, and the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 six months after the date of the referral to the CARE program, unless the defendants case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that time period. Except as provided in this section and Sections 5978 and 5978.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, this paragraph does not alter the confidential nature of CARE program proceedings.
(E)(5)If the defendant does not qualify for services pursuant to subparagraphs (A) to (D), paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive, dismiss the charges.
(c)(d)It is the intent of the Legislature that a defendant subject to the terms of this section receive mental health treatment in a treatment facility and not a jail. A term of four days will be deemed to have been served for every two days spent in actual custody against the maximum period of treatment pursuant to subparagraphs (B) and (D) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) and subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (b), paragraphs (2) and (4) of subdivision (c) and paragraphs (1) and (2) of subdivision (b), if applicable. A defendant not in actual custody shall otherwise receive day for day credit against the term of treatment from the date the defendant is accepted into treatment in the event that the criminal charges have not previously been dismissed. Actual custody has the same meaning as in Section 4019.
(e)The county behavioral health agency and jail medical providers may share confidential medical records and other relevant information with the court, including, but not limited to, prior interactions with and treatment of the defendant, for the purpose of determining likelihood of eligibility for behavioral health services and programs pursuant to this section. The disclosure of information pursuant to this subdivision is subject to applicable state and federal privacy laws.
(d)(f)This section shall apply only as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 1367.
(e)(g)It is the intent of the Legislature that the court shall consider all treatment options as provided in this section prior to dismissing criminal charges. However, nothing in this section limits a courts discretion pursuant to Section 1385.
SEC. 2.Section 5971 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5971.Unless the context otherwise requires, the following definitions shall govern the construction of this part.
(a)CARE agreement means a voluntary settlement agreement entered into by the parties. A CARE agreement includes the same elements as a CARE plan to support the respondent in accessing community-based services and supports.
(b)CARE plan means an individualized, appropriate range of community-based services and supports, as set forth in this part, which include clinically appropriate behavioral health care and stabilization medications, housing, and other supportive services, as appropriate, pursuant to Section 5982.
(c)CARE process means the court and related proceedings to implement the CARE Act.
(d)Clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment means all of the following:
(1)The persons condition is stable and not deteriorating.
(2)The person is likely to survive safely in the community without supervision.
(3)The person is currently engaged in treatment and managing symptoms through medication or other therapeutic interventions.
(4)The persons mental health condition is not negatively impacting their ability to live safely within the community or current housing situation.
(d)(e)Counsel means the attorney representing the respondent, appointed pursuant to Section 5977, or chosen by the respondent, in CARE Act proceedings and matters related to CARE agreements and CARE plans. Representation of a respondent in these matters does not alter counsels obligations under the State Bar Act and the Rules of Professional Conduct, including subdivision (e) of Section 6068 of the Business and Professions Code and rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.
(e)(f)County behavioral health agency means the local director of mental health services described in Section 5607, the local behavioral health director, or both as applicable, or their designee.
(f)(g)Court-ordered evaluation means an evaluation ordered by a superior court pursuant to Section 5977.1.
(g)(h)Department means the State Department of Health Care Services.
(h)(i)Graduation plan means a voluntary agreement entered into by the parties at the end of the CARE program that includes a strategy to support a successful transition out of court jurisdiction and that may include a psychiatric advance directive. A graduation plan includes the same elements as a CARE plan to support the respondent in accessing community-based services and supports. The graduation plan shall not place additional requirements on the local government entities and is not enforceable by the court.
(i)(j)Homeless outreach worker means a person who engages people experiencing homelessness to assess for unmet needs, offer information, services, or other assistance, or provide care coordination.
(j)(k)Indian health care provider means a health care program operated by the Indian Health Service, an Indian tribe, a tribal organization, or urban Indian organization (I/T/U) as those terms are defined in Section 4 of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1603).
(k)(l)Legal proceeding means any administrative, civil, or criminal proceeding, including, but not limited to, juvenile court proceedings and family court proceedings and services, and any form of alternative dispute resolution, including arbitration and mediation, except for the following:
(1)A proceeding under this part.
(2)A proceeding under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act described in paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 5979.
(3)A proceeding from which the respondent was referred to CARE Act proceedings as described in Section 5978.
(4)A disciplinary proceeding under Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 6000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code.
(5)An appeal from any of the proceedings identified in paragraphs (1) through (4), inclusive.
(l)(m)Licensed behavioral health professional means either any of the following:
(1)A licensed mental health professional, as defined in subdivision (j) of Section 4096.
(2)A person who has been granted a waiver of licensure requirements by the department pursuant to Section 5751.2.
(3)A nurse practitioner, as defined in Section 2835 of the Business and Professions Code.
(4)A physician assistant, as defined in subdivision (d) of Section 3501 of the Business and Professions Code.
(m)(n)Parties means the petitioner, the respondent, the county behavioral health agency in the county where proceedings under this part are pending, and any local governmental entity added by the court pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 5977.1.
(n)(o)Petitioner means the person who files the CARE Act petition with the court. Additionally, if the petitioner is a person listed in Section 5974 other than the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the petitioner shall have the right to file a petition with the court, but at the initial hearing the court shall substitute the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, of the county in which the proceedings are filed as petitioner. The original petitioner may, at the courts discretion and in furtherance of the interests of the respondent, retain rights as described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (6) of subdivision (b) of Section 5977.
(o)(p)Psychiatric advance directive means a legal document, executed on a voluntary basis in accordance with the requirements for advance health care directives in Division 4.7 (commencing with Section 4600) of the Probate Code, by a person who has the capacity to make medical decisions, that allows a person with mental illness to protect their autonomy and ability to direct their own care by documenting their preferences for treatment in advance of a mental health crisis.
(p)(q)Respondent means the person who is the subject of the petition for the CARE process.
(q)(r)Stabilization medications means medications included in the CARE plan that primarily consist of antipsychotic medications to reduce symptoms of hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized thinking. Stabilization medications may be administered as long-acting injections if clinically indicated. Stabilization medications shall not be forcibly administered.
(r)(s)Supporter means an adult designated by the respondent who assists the person who is the subject of the petition, which assistance may include supporting the person to understand, make, communicate, implement, or act on their own life decisions during the CARE process, including a CARE agreement, a CARE plan, and developing a graduation plan. A supporter shall not act independently.
SEC. 3.Section 5972 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5972.An individual shall qualify for the CARE process only if all of the following criteria are met:
(a)The person is 18 years of age or older.
(b)The person is currently experiencing a serious mental disorder, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 5600.3 and has a diagnosis identified in the disorder class: schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, or mood disorders with psychotic features, except psychosis related to current intoxication, as defined in the most current version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. This section does not establish respondent eligibility based upon a psychotic disorder that is due to a medical condition or is not primarily psychiatric in nature, including, but not limited to, physical health conditions such as traumatic brain injury, autism, dementia, or neurologic conditions. A person who has a current diagnosis of substance use disorder as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 1374.72 of the Health and Safety Code but who does not also meet the required criteria in this section shall not qualify for the CARE process.
(c)The person is not clinically stabilized in on-going ongoing voluntary treatment.
(d)At least one of the following is true:
(1)The person is unlikely to survive safely in the community without supervision and the persons condition is substantially deteriorating.
(2)The person is in need of services and supports in order to prevent a relapse or deterioration that would be likely to result in grave disability or serious harm to the person or others, as used in Section 5150.
(e)Participation in a CARE plan or CARE agreement would be the least restrictive alternative necessary to ensure the persons recovery and stability.
(f)It is likely that the person will benefit from participation in a CARE plan or CARE agreement.
SECTION 1.SEC. 4.Section 5977 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, as amended by Section 5 of Chapter 640 of the Statutes of 2024, is amended to read:5977.(a)(1)The court shall promptly review the petition to determine if the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972.
(2)If the court finds that the petitioner has not made a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, the court may dismiss the case and, if the court does so, it shall order that the dismissal is without prejudice, unless Section 5975.1 applies. Nothing other than Section 5975.1 prevents a petitioner whose petition was dismissed without prejudice from refiling the petition with amended information.
(3)If the court finds that the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, the court shall do one of the following:
(A)If the petitioner is the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the court shall do the following:
(i)Set the matter for an initial appearance on the petition within 14 court days. days, or concurrently conduct the initial appearance with the prima facie determination pursuant to clause (v) of this paragraph.
(ii)Appoint a qualified legal services project, as defined in Sections 6213 to 6214.5, inclusive, of the Business and Professions Code, to represent the respondent. If no legal services project has agreed to accept these appointments, a public defender or other counsel working in that capacity shall be appointed to represent the respondent.
(iii)Determine whether the petition includes all of the following information and, if it does not, order the county behavioral health agency to submit a written report with the court within 14 court days that includes all of the following:
(I)A determination as to whether the respondent meets, or is likely to meet, the criteria for the CARE process.
(II)The outcome of efforts made to voluntarily engage the respondent prior to the filing of the petition.
(III)Conclusions and recommendations about the respondents ability to voluntarily engage in services.
(iv)Order the county behavioral health agency to provide notice to the respondent, the appointed counsel, and the county behavioral health agency in the county where the respondent resides, if different from the county where the CARE process has commenced.
(v)If the requirements set forth in clauses (ii) to (iv), inclusive, of this subparagraph and all of the requirements of subdivision (b) are satisfied at the time of the prima facie determination, and the petitioner and respondent are both present and consent, the court may conduct the initial appearance concurrently with the prima facie determination.
(B)If the petitioner is a person other than the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the court shall order a county agency, or their designee, as determined by the court, to investigate, as necessary, file a written report with the court as soon as practicable, but within 30 court days, and provide notice to the respondent and petitioner that a report has been ordered. Parties shall complete the investigation with appropriate urgency. The written report shall include all of the following:
(i)A determination as to whether the respondent meets, or is likely to meet, the criteria for the CARE process.
(ii)The outcome of efforts made to voluntarily engage the respondent during the report period.
(iii)Conclusions and recommendations about the respondents ability to voluntarily engage in services.
(iv)The information, including protected health information, necessary to support the determinations, conclusions, and recommendations in the report.
(4)If, upon a request by the county agency ordered to investigate and file a report under subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3), the court finds that the county agency is making progress to engage the respondent, the court may, in its discretion, grant the county agency no more than 30 additional days to continue to work with, engage, and enroll the individual in voluntary treatment and services. The county agency shall provide notice to the respondent and petitioner that an extension for filing a report has been granted.
(5)Upon receipt of the report described in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3), the court shall, within five days, take one of the following actions:
(A)If the court determines that voluntary engagement with the respondent is effective, and that the individual has enrolled or is likely to enroll in voluntary behavioral health treatment, the court shall dismiss the matter.
(B)If the court determines, based on the county agencys report, that the evidence does not support a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, the court shall dismiss the matter. This section shall not prevent a county behavioral health agency from continuing to voluntarily engage with a person not described in Section 5972 but who is in need of services and supports.
(C)If the court determines, based on the county agencys report, that the evidence does support a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, and engagement with the county agency was not effective, the court shall do all of the following:
(i)Set an initial appearance on the petition within 14 court days.
(ii)Appoint a qualified legal services project, as defined in Sections 6213 to 6214.5, inclusive, of the Business and Professions Code or, if no legal services project has agreed to accept these appointments, a public defender or other counsel working in that capacity to represent the respondent.
(iii)Order the county agency to provide notice of the initial appearance to the petitioner, the respondent, the appointed counsel, the county behavioral health agency in the county where the respondent resides, and, if different, the county where the CARE court proceedings have commenced.
(b)At the initial appearance on the petition, all of the following shall apply:
(1)The court shall permit the respondent to substitute their own counsel.
(2)Petitioner shall be present. If the petitioner is not present, the matter may be dismissed.
(3)Respondent may waive personal appearance and appear through counsel. If the respondent does not waive personal appearance and does not appear at the hearing, and the court makes a finding in open court that reasonable attempts to elicit the attendance of the respondent have failed, the court may conduct the hearing in the respondents absence if the court makes a finding in open court that conducting the hearing without the participation or presence of the respondent would be in the respondents best interest.
(4)A representative from the county behavioral health agency shall be present.
(5)If the respondent asserts that they are enrolled in a federally recognized Indian tribe or are receiving services from an Indian health care provider, a tribal court, or a tribal organization, a representative from the program, the tribe, or the tribal court shall be allowed to be present, subject to the consent of the respondent. The tribal representative shall be entitled to notice by the county of the initial appearance.
(6)(A)If the petitioner is a person other than the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the court shall issue an order relieving the original petitioner and appointing the director of the county behavioral health agency or their designee as the successor petitioner.
(B)If the original petitioner is described in subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 5974, all of the following apply:
(i)The original petitioner shall have the right to be present and make a statement at the initial hearing on the merits of the petition held pursuant to paragraph (7).
(ii)(I)Until July 1, 2025, the court may, in its discretion, assign ongoing rights of notice to the original petitioner.
(II)Commencing July 1, 2025, unless the court determines, either upon its own motion or upon the motion of the respondent, at any point in the proceedings, that it likely would be detrimental to the treatment or well-being of the respondent, the court shall provide ongoing notice of proceedings to the original petitioner throughout the CARE proceedings, including notice of when a continuance is granted or when a case is dismissed. If a continuance is granted, the notice shall provide a general reason for the continuance, including the absence of the respondent or one of the grounds pursuant to Rule 3.1332 of the California Rules of Court. If a case is dismissed, the notice shall specify the statutory basis for the dismissal. A notice pursuant to this clause shall not disclose any patient information that is protected under the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-191), the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (Part 2.6 (commencing with Section 56) of Division 1 of the Civil Code), or this act, without the respondents consent.
(iii)To the extent that the respondent consents, the court may allow the original petitioner to participate in the respondents CARE proceedings.
(iv)The original petitioner may file a new petition with the court, pursuant to Section 5974, if the matter is dismissed and there is a change in circumstances.
(C)If the original petitioner is not described in subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 5974, the court shall not assign ongoing rights to the original petitioner, other than the right to be present and make a statement at the hearing on the merits of the petition held pursuant to paragraph (7).
(7)(A)The court shall set a hearing on the merits of the petition within 10 days, at which time the court shall determine whether, by clear and convincing evidence, the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972. In making this determination, the court shall consider all evidence properly before it, including any report from the county behavioral health agency ordered pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) and any additional admissible evidence presented by the parties, including the petition submitted and any statement given by the original petitioner. A licensed behavioral health professional may testify as an expert concerning whether the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972 provided that the court finds that the professional has special knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education sufficient to qualify as an expert under Section 720 of the Evidence Code.
(B)The hearing on the merits of the petition may be conducted concurrently with the initial appearance upon stipulation of the successor petitioner and the respondent, subject to the approval by the court.
(c)(1)If, at the hearing on the merits of the petition, the court finds there is not clear and convincing evidence that the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972, the court shall dismiss the case without prejudice, unless the court makes a finding, in open court, that the original petitioners filing was not in good faith, in which case the dismissal shall be with prejudice.
(2)If, at the hearing on the merits of the petition, the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency to work with the respondent, the respondents counsel, and the supporter to engage the respondent in behavioral health treatment and attempt to enter into a CARE agreement. The court shall set a case management hearing within 14 days.
(3)If the respondent is enrolled in a federally recognized Indian tribe, the respondent county shall provide notice of the case management hearing to the tribe, subject to the consent of the respondent.
(d)The following shall apply to any written report submitted by a county behavioral health agency to the court pursuant to this section:
(1)The report is confidential and not subject to disclosure or inspection under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(2)The report is inadmissible in any subsequent legal proceeding, except upon motion of the respondent in that subsequent legal proceeding.
(3)The report shall be confidential pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 5976.5.
(4)This subdivision shall not affect the applicability of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 5977.1, make admissible any evidence that is not otherwise admissible, or permit a witness to base an opinion on any matter that is not a proper basis for such an opinion. The admission or exclusion of evidence shall be pursuant to the rules of evidence established by the Evidence Code, including, but not limited to, Section 352 of the Evidence Code, and by judicial decision.
SEC. 5.Section 5977.1 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5977.1.(a)(1)At the case management hearing, the court shall hear evidence as to whether the parties have entered, or are likely to enter, into a CARE agreement.
(2)If the court finds that the parties have entered, or are likely to enter, into a CARE agreement, the court shall do one of the following:
(A)Approve the terms of the CARE agreement or modify the terms of the CARE agreement and approve the agreement as modified by the court, and continue the matter and set a progress hearing for 60 days.
(B)Continue the matter for 14 days to allow the parties additional time to enter into a CARE agreement, upon stipulation of the parties.
(3)Nothing in this subdivision shall prohibit the parties from agreeing to, and the court from approving, amendments to the CARE agreement.
(4)The court may, in its discretion, call additional progress hearings beyond the hearing set at 60 days, for the duration of the CARE agreement.
(b)If the court finds that the parties have not entered into a CARE agreement, and are not likely to enter into a CARE agreement, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency, through a licensed behavioral health professional, to conduct a clinical evaluation of the respondent, unless there is an existing clinical evaluation of the respondent completed within the last 30 days and the parties stipulate to the use of that evaluation. The evaluation shall address, at a minimum, the following:
(1)A clinical diagnosis of the respondent.
(2)Whether the respondent has the legal capacity to give informed consent regarding psychotropic medication.
(3)Any other information as ordered by the court or that the licensed behavioral health professional conducting the evaluation determines would help the court make future informed decisions about the appropriate care and services the respondent should receive.
(4)An analysis of recommended services, programs, housing, medications, and interventions that support the recovery and stability of the respondent.
(c)(1)The court shall set a clinical evaluation hearing to review the evaluation within 21 days. The court shall order the county to file the evaluation with the court and provide the evaluation to the respondents counsel no later than five days prior to the scheduled clinical evaluation hearing. The clinical evaluation hearing may be continued for a maximum of 14 days upon stipulation of the respondent and the county behavioral health agency, unless there is good cause for a longer extension.
(2)At the clinical evaluation review hearing, the court shall review the evaluation and other evidence from the county behavioral health agency and the respondent. The county behavioral health agency and the respondent may present evidence and call witnesses, including the person who conducted the evaluation. Only relevant and admissible evidence that fully complies with the rules of evidence may be considered by the court.
(3)At the conclusion of the hearing, the court shall determine whether the respondent, by clear and convincing evidence, meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972 and make orders as follows:
(A)If the court finds that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency, the respondent, and the respondents counsel and supporter to jointly develop a CARE plan within 14 days.
(B)If the court does not find that clear and convincing evidence establishes that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, the court shall dismiss the petition.
(4)If the respondent is a self-identified American Indian or Alaska Native individual, as defined in Sections 1603(13), 1603(28), and 1679(a) of Title 25 of the United States Code, has been determined eligible as an Indian under Section 136.12 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, or is currently receiving services from an Indian health care provider or tribal court, the county behavioral health agency shall use its best efforts to meaningfully consult with and incorporate the Indian health care provider or tribal court available to the respondent to develop the CARE plan.
(5)The evaluation and all reports, documents, and filings submitted to the court shall be confidential.
(6)The date for the hearing to review and consider approval of the proposed CARE plan shall be set not more than 14 days from the date of the order to develop a CARE plan, unless the court finds good cause for an extension. The party requesting an extension of time for the CARE plan review hearing shall provide notice to the opposing party and their counsel of the request for extension of time, and the courts order if the request is granted.
(d)(1)At the CARE plan review hearing, the parties shall present their plan or plans to the court. The county behavioral health agency or the respondent, or both, may present a proposed CARE plan.
(2)After consideration of the plans proposed by the parties, the court shall adopt the elements of a CARE plan that support the recovery and stability of the respondent. The court may issue any orders necessary to support the respondent in accessing appropriate services and supports, including prioritization for those services and supports, subject to applicable laws and available funding pursuant to Section 5982. These orders shall constitute the CARE plan and may be amended.
(3)A court may order medication if it finds, upon review of the court-ordered evaluation and hearing from the parties, that, by clear and convincing evidence, the respondent lacks the capacity to give informed consent to the administration of medically necessary stabilization medication. To the extent the court orders medically necessary stabilization medication, the medication shall not be forcibly administered and the respondents failure to comply with a medication order shall not result in a penalty, including, but not limited to, contempt or termination of the CARE plan pursuant to Section 5979.
(4)If the proposed CARE plan includes services and supports, such as housing, provided directly or indirectly through another local governmental entity, that local entity may agree to provide the service or support, or the court may consider a motion by either of the parties to add the local entity as a party to the CARE proceeding. If the local entity agrees to provide the service or support, it may request to be added as a party by the court.
(5)If, after presentation of the CARE plan or plans, the court determines that additional information is needed, including from a licensed behavioral health professional, the court shall order a supplemental report to be filed by the county behavioral health agency for which the court may grant a continuance of no more than 14 days, unless there is good cause for a longer extension.
(6)If there is no CARE plan because the parties have not had sufficient time to complete it, the court may grant a continuance of no more than 14 days, unless there is good cause for a longer extension.
(7)This subdivision does not prohibit the parties from agreeing to, and the court from approving, amendments to the CARE plan. The court may also approve amendments to the CARE plan upon the finding that those amendments are necessary to support the respondent in accessing appropriate services and supports, following a hearing on the issue.
(e)The issuance of an order approving a CARE plan pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) begins the CARE process timeline, which shall not exceed one year.
SEC. 6.Section 5977.3 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5977.3.(a)(1)In the 11th month of the process timeline, the court shall hold a one-year status hearing. Not fewer than five court days prior to the one-year status hearing, the county behavioral health agency shall file a report with the court and shall serve the report on the respondent and the respondents counsel and supporter. The report shall include the following information:
(A)The progress that the respondent has made on the CARE plan, including a final assessment of the respondents stability.
(B)What services and supports in the CARE plan were provided, and what services and supports were not provided, over the life of the program.
(C)Any issues the respondent expressed or exhibited in adhering to the CARE plan.
(D)Recommendations for next steps, including what ongoing and additional services would benefit the respondent that the county behavioral health agency can facilitate or provide.
(2)At an evidentiary hearing, the respondent shall be permitted to respond to the report submitted by the county behavioral health agency and to the county behavioral health agencys testimony. Respondent shall be permitted to introduce their own information and recommendations. The respondent shall have the right at the hearing to call witnesses and to present evidence as to whether the respondent agrees with the report. The respondent may request either to be graduated from the program or to remain in the program.
(3)The court shall issue an order as follows:
(A)If the respondent elects requests to be graduated from the program, and the court approves this request, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency and the respondent to work jointly on a voluntary graduation plan. The plan and the court shall schedule a hearing in the 12th month after adoption of the CARE plan for presentation of the graduation plan. The court shall review the graduation plan and recite the terms in open court. The graduation plan shall not place additional requirements on local governmental entities and is not enforceable by the court, except that the graduation plan may, at the respondents election, include a psychiatric advance directive, which shall have the force of law. Upon completion of the hearing, the respondent shall be officially graduated from the program.
(B)If the respondent elects requests to remain in the CARE process, the respondent may request any amount of time, up to and including one additional year. The court may approve the request and thereby permit the ongoing voluntary participation of the respondent if the court finds both of the following:
(i)The respondent did not successfully complete the CARE plan.
(ii)The respondent would benefit from continuation of the CARE plan.
(C)The court shall issue an order permitting the respondent to continue in the CARE plan or denying respondents request to remain in the CARE plan, and state its reasons in open court.
(b)The respondent may be involuntarily reappointed to the program only if the court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that all of the following conditions apply:
(1)The respondent did not successfully complete the CARE process.
(2)All services and supports required through the CARE process were provided to the respondent.
(3)The respondent would benefit from continuation in the CARE process.
(4)The respondent currently meets the requirements in Section 5972.
(c)A respondent may only be reappointed to the CARE process once, for up to one additional year.
SEC. 7.Section 5978 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5978.(a)A court may refer an individual from assisted outpatient treatment, as well as from conservatorship proceedings pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 5350) of Part 1 of Division 5 (LPS conservatorship) to CARE Act proceedings. If the individual is referred from assisted outpatient treatment, the county behavioral health director or their designee shall be the petitioner. If the individual is referred from LPS conservatorship proceedings, the conservator or proposed conservator shall be the petitioner pursuant to Section 5974. conservatorship), from misdemeanor proceedings pursuant to Section 1370.01 of the Penal Code, or from felony proceedings pursuant to Section 1370 of the Penal Code to the CARE Act court.
(b)A court may refer an individual from misdemeanor proceedings pursuant to Section 1370.01 of the Penal Code to CARE Act proceedings. The county behavioral health director or their designee shall be the petitioner.(b) The CARE Act court may consider a referral made pursuant to this section to be a petition satisfying the requirements of paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 5977 if both of the following conditions are met:
(1)The referral contains information sufficient to otherwise satisfy the petition requirements in Section 5975.
(2)The information included in the referral makes a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972.
(c)If the CARE Act court elects to consider a referral to be a petition pursuant to subdivision (b), the CARE Act court shall notify the referring court that the referral has been accepted as a petition for CARE Act proceedings.
(d)If the CARE Act court does not elect to consider a referral to be a petition pursuant to subdivision (b), the CARE Act court shall order the appropriate petitioner candidate to do the following within 14 court days:
(1)Complete an investigation to determine whether to a file a petition on behalf of the referred individual.
(2)Notify the referring court whether it intends to file a CARE Act petition on behalf of the referred individual.
(e)If the appropriate petitioner candidate notifies the CARE Act court that it requires additional time to complete its investigation pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the CARE Act court may grant an extension of up to 30 court days.
(f)For purposes of this section, appropriate petitioner candidate means:
(1)For referrals from assisted outpatient treatment or from misdemeanor proceedings, the county behavioral health director or their designee.
(2)For referrals from conservatorship proceedings, the conservator or proposed conservator.
SEC. 8.Section 5985 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:5985.(a)(1)The department shall develop, in consultation with county behavioral health agencies, other relevant state or local government entities, disability rights groups, individuals with lived experience, families, counsel, racial justice experts, and other appropriate stakeholders, an annual CARE Act report. The department shall post the annual report on its internet website.
(2)The department, in consultation with county behavioral health agencies and courts, shall specify the length of time that data on former participants shall be reported pursuant to subdivision (e), which shall be a minimum of 12 months after completion of and a maximum of 36 months following engagement in CARE Act elective services, a CARE agreement, or CARE plan.
(3)For the purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(A)Former participant means an individual who enters into CARE Act elective services, a CARE agreement, or a CARE plan, but who has either graduated from CARE, or for whom CARE Act proceedings were dismissed or terminated. Counties shall not be responsible for reporting on any individual who is privately insured or who no longer resides in California.
(B)Active participants means an individual who is an elective client, or who has a CARE plan or CARE agreement.
(b)County behavioral health agencies and any other state or local governmental entity, as identified by the department, shall provide data related to the CARE Act participants, services, and supports to the department. The department shall determine the data measures and specifications, and shall publish them via guidance issues pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 5984.
(c)Each county behavioral health department and any other state and local governmental entity, as identified by the department, shall provide the required data to the department, in a format and frequency as directed by the department.
(d)(1)In consultation with the Judicial Council, the department shall develop an annual reporting schedule for the submission of CARE Act data from the trial courts.
(2)Data from the trial courts shall be submitted to the Judicial Council, which shall aggregate the data and submit it to the department consistent with the reporting schedule developed pursuant to paragraph (1).
(3)On an annual basis to be determined by the Judicial Council and consistent with the annual reporting schedule developed pursuant to paragraph (1), the trial courts shall report to the Judicial Council the following data related to CARE Act petitions:
(A)The number of petitions submitted pursuant to Section 5975.
(B)The number of initial appearances appearance hearings on the petition set held pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 5977.
(C)The total number of hearings held pursuant to this part.
(D)The total number of CARE plans ordered and CARE agreements approved.
(E)The total number of court petitions dismissed, as reported by the Judicial Council.
(e)The annual report shall include process measures to examine the scope of impact and monitor the performance of CARE Act model implementation. The measures and reporting requirements shall be developed by the department in consultation with county behavioral health agencies. The report shall include trial court petition data pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (d) and, to the extent administrative data is available, all of the following information compiled from county behavioral health departments and courts:
(1)The demographics of all participants, including, but not limited to, the age, sex, race, ethnicity, disability, languages spoken, sexual orientation, gender identity, housing status, veteran status, immigration status, health coverage status, including Medi-Cal enrollment status, information related to CARE criteria outlined in Section 5972, and county of residence.
(2)The petitioners relationship to the CARE Act respondent as defined in Section 5974.
(3)The services and supports ordered, the services and supports provided, and the services and supports ordered but not provided to all active and former participants.
(4)The housing placements of all active and former participants. Placements include, but are not limited to, transition to a higher level of care, independent living in the persons own house or apartment, community-based housing, community-based housing with services, shelter, and no housing.
(5)Treatments continued and terminated of all active and former participants.
(6)Substance use disorder rates and rates of treatment among all active and former participants.
(7)Detentions and other Lanterman-Petris-Short Act involvement for all active and former participants.
(8)Criminal justice involvement of all active and former participants.
(9)Deaths among all active and former participants, along with the cause of death.
(10)Type, format, and frequency of outreach and engagement activities provided by a county behavioral health agency to engage an individual who is the subject of a referral or petition, including interactions about the individuals eligible or likely to be eligible and outcomes of these efforts.
(11)In consultation with the department and county behavioral health departments, the number, rates, and trends of contacts made to the county behavioral health agency about individuals eligible or likely to be eligible for the CARE process, including outcomes of those contacts.
(12)The number, rates, and source of referrals to county behavioral health departments, including, but not limited to, referrals resulting in a petition or reason for not filing a petition, length of time from referral to outcome, and services provided for those engaged voluntarily without a petition.
(13)The number, rates, and trends of petitions resulting in dismissal and hearings.
(14)Information on petition dispositions, including, but not limited to, disposition recommendations and the number of days from petition to disposition.
(15)The number, rates, and trends of supporters.
(16)The number, rates, and trends of approved CARE agreements.
(17)The number, rates, and trends of ordered and completed CARE plans.
(18)Statistics on the services and supports, including court orders for stabilizing medications.
(19)The rates of adherence to medication.
(20)The number, rates, and trends of psychiatric advance directives created for active participants.
(21)The number, rates, and trends of developed graduation plans.
(22)Outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of the CARE Act model, such as improvement in housing status, including gaining and maintaining housing, reductions in emergency department visits and inpatient hospitalizations, reductions in law enforcement encounters and incarceration, reductions in involuntary treatment and conservatorship, and reductions in substance use.
(23)A health equity assessment of the CARE Act to identify demographic disparities based on demographic data in paragraph (1), and to inform disparity reduction efforts.
(24)Data regarding referrals made pursuant to Section 5978.1, as part of the CARE Act.
(f)(1)The report shall include, at a minimum, information on the effectiveness of the CARE Act model in improving outcomes and reducing disparities, homelessness, criminal justice involvement, conservatorships, and hospitalization of participants. The annual report shall include process measures to examine the scope of impact and monitor the performance of CARE Act model implementation, such as the number and source of petitions filed for CARE Court; the number, rates, and trends of petitions resulting in dismissal and hearings; the number, rates, and trends of supporters; the number, rates, and trends of voluntary CARE agreements; the number, rates, and trends of ordered and completed CARE plans; the services and supports included in CARE plans, including court orders for stabilizing medications; the rates of adherence to medication; the number, rates, and trends of psychiatric advance directives; and the number, rates, and trends of developed graduation plans. The report shall include outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of the CARE Act model, such as improvement in housing status, including gaining and maintaining housing; reductions in emergency department visits and inpatient hospitalizations; reductions in law enforcement encounters and incarceration; reductions in involuntary treatment and conservatorship; and reductions in substance use. The annual report shall examine these data through the lens of health equity to identify racial, ethnic, and other demographic disparities and inform disparity reduction efforts.
(2)Data shall be stratified by age, sex, race, ethnicity, languages spoken, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, housing status, veteran status, immigration status, health coverage source, and county, to the extent statistically relevant data is available.
(g)The outcomes shall be presented to relevant state oversight bodies, including, but not limited to, the California Interagency Council on Homelessness.
(h)(1)Beginning in 2026, the department shall include in its annual CARE Act report quantitative, deidentified information concerning the operation of this part.
(2)Based on information provided to the department in a form and manner specified by the department, in consultation with the Judicial Council and county behavioral health departments, in accordance with subdivision (b) of Section 5984, the report shall include all of the following information, aggregated by county, compiled from county behavioral health departments, courts, and the department, depending on the source:
(A)The number of contacts to the county behavioral health department about individuals eligible or likely to be eligible for the CARE process, including outcome of contacts.
(B)The number of CARE petitions filed with the superior court.
(C)The petitioner type for each petition filed with the superior court.
(D)Disposition of each petition filed with the superior court.
(E)The number of days between filing each petition and the petitions disposition.
(F)Demographic information of each CARE Act participant or potentially eligible CARE Act participant, including, but not limited to, age, sex, race, ethnicity, disability, languages spoken, sexual orientation, gender identity, housing status, veteran status, immigration status, health coverage status, including Medi-Cal enrollment status, information related to CARE criteria outlined in Section 5972, and county of residence, to the extent administrative data is available and statistically relevant.
(G)The number of referrals of individuals in conservatorship proceedings made pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 5978, including the disposition of each referral.
(H)The number of referrals made pursuant to Section 5978.1, including the disposition of each referral.
(i)Information publicly released or published pursuant to this part shall not contain data that may lead to the identification of participants or petitioners or information that would otherwise allow an individual to link the published information to a specific person. Data published by the department shall be deidentified in compliance with Section 164.514(a) and (b) of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
SEC. 9.If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
SEC. 2.SEC. 10.This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
The CARE Act took effect in October 2023, and therefore important changes to the act must take effect immediately to ensure the CARE Acts success in providing timely assistance to respondents.
(a)(1)The court shall promptly review the petition to determine if the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972.
(2)If the court finds that the petitioner has not made a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, the court may dismiss the case and, if the court does so, it shall order that the dismissal is without prejudice, unless Section 5975.1 applies. Nothing other than Section 5975.1 prevents a petitioner whose petition was dismissed without prejudice from refiling the petition with amended information.
(3)If the court finds that the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, the court shall do one of the following:
(A)If the petitioner is the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the court shall do the following:
(i)Set the matter for an initial appearance on the petition within 14 court days.
(ii)Appoint a qualified legal services project, as defined in Sections 6213 to 6214.5, inclusive, of the Business and Professions Code, to represent the respondent. If no legal services project has agreed to accept these appointments, a public defender or other counsel working in that capacity shall be appointed to represent the respondent.
(iii)Determine whether the petition includes all of the following information and, if it does not, order the county behavioral health agency to submit a written report with the court within 14 court days that includes all of the following:
(I)A determination as to whether the respondent meets, or is likely to meet, the criteria for the CARE process.
(II)The outcome of efforts made to voluntarily engage the respondent prior to the filing of the petition.
(III)Conclusions and recommendations about the respondents ability to voluntarily engage in services.
(iv)Order the county behavioral health agency to provide notice to the respondent, the appointed counsel, and the county behavioral health agency in the county where the respondent resides, if different from the county where the CARE process has commenced.
(v)If the requirements of this subparagraph and of subdivision (b) are satisfied at the time of the prima facie determination, the court may conduct the initial appearance concurrently with the prima facie determination.
(B)If the petitioner is a person other than the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the court shall order a county agency, or their designee, as determined by the court, to investigate, as necessary, file a written report with the court as soon as practicable, but within 30 court days, and provide notice to the respondent and petitioner that a report has been ordered. Parties shall complete the investigation with appropriate urgency. The written report shall include all of the following:
(i)A determination as to whether the respondent meets, or is likely to meet, the criteria for the CARE process.
(ii)The outcome of efforts made to voluntarily engage the respondent during the report period.
(iii)Conclusions and recommendations about the respondents ability to voluntarily engage in services.
(iv)The information, including protected health information, necessary to support the determinations, conclusions, and recommendations in the report.
(4)If, upon a request by the county agency ordered to investigate and file a report under subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3), the court finds that the county agency is making progress to engage the respondent, the court may, in its discretion, grant the county agency no more than 30 additional days to continue to work with, engage, and enroll the individual in voluntary treatment and services. The county agency shall provide notice to the respondent and petitioner that an extension for filing a report has been granted.
(5)Upon receipt of the report described in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3), the court shall, within five days, take one of the following actions:
(A)If the court determines that voluntary engagement with the respondent is effective, and that the individual has enrolled or is likely to enroll in voluntary behavioral health treatment, the court shall dismiss the matter.
(B)If the court determines, based on the county agencys report, that the evidence does not support a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, the court shall dismiss the matter. This section shall not prevent a county behavioral health agency from continuing to voluntarily engage with a person not described in Section 5972 but who is in need of services and supports.
(C)If the court determines, based on the county agencys report, that the evidence does support a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972, and engagement with the county agency was not effective, the court shall do all of the following:
(i)Set an initial appearance on the petition within 14 court days.
(ii)Appoint a qualified legal services project, as defined in Sections 6213 to 6214.5, inclusive, of the Business and Professions Code or, if no legal services project has agreed to accept these appointments, a public defender or other counsel working in that capacity to represent the respondent.
(iii)Order the county agency to provide notice of the initial appearance to the petitioner, the respondent, the appointed counsel, the county behavioral health agency in the county where the respondent resides, and, if different, the county where the CARE court proceedings have commenced.
(b)At the initial appearance on the petition, all of the following shall apply:
(1)The court shall permit the respondent to substitute their own counsel.
(2)Petitioner shall be present. If the petitioner is not present, the matter may be dismissed.
(3)Respondent may waive personal appearance and appear through counsel. If the respondent does not waive personal appearance and does not appear at the hearing, and the court makes a finding in open court that reasonable attempts to elicit the attendance of the respondent have failed, the court may conduct the hearing in the respondents absence if the court makes a finding in open court that conducting the hearing without the participation or presence of the respondent would be in the respondents best interest.
(4)A representative from the county behavioral health agency shall be present.
(5)If the respondent asserts that they are enrolled in a federally recognized Indian tribe or are receiving services from an Indian health care provider, a tribal court, or a tribal organization, a representative from the program, the tribe, or the tribal court shall be allowed to be present, subject to the consent of the respondent. The tribal representative shall be entitled to notice by the county of the initial appearance.
(6)(A)If the petitioner is a person other than the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee, the court shall issue an order relieving the original petitioner and appointing the director of the county behavioral health agency or their designee as the successor petitioner.
(B)If the original petitioner is described in subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 5974, all of the following apply:
(i)The original petitioner shall have the right to be present and make a statement at the initial hearing on the merits of the petition held pursuant to paragraph (7).
(ii)(I)Until July 1, 2025, the court may, in its discretion, assign ongoing rights of notice to the original petitioner.
(II)Commencing July 1, 2025, unless the court determines, either upon its own motion or upon the motion of the respondent, at any point in the proceedings, that it likely would be detrimental to the treatment or well-being of the respondent, the court shall provide ongoing notice of proceedings to the original petitioner throughout the CARE proceedings, including notice of when a continuance is granted or when a case is dismissed. If a continuance is granted, the notice shall provide a general reason for the continuance, including the absence of the respondent or one of the grounds pursuant to Rule 3.1332 of the California Rules of Court. If a case is dismissed, the notice shall specify the statutory basis for the dismissal. A notice pursuant to this clause shall not disclose any patient information that is protected under the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-191), the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (Part 2.6 (commencing with Section 56) of Division 1 of the Civil Code), or this act, without the respondents consent.
(iii)To the extent that the respondent consents, the court may allow the original petitioner to participate in the respondents CARE proceedings.
(iv)The original petitioner may file a new petition with the court, pursuant to Section 5974, if the matter is dismissed and there is a change in circumstances.
(C)If the original petitioner is not described in subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 5974, the court shall not assign ongoing rights to the original petitioner, other than the right to be present and make a statement at the hearing on the merits of the petition held pursuant to paragraph (7).
(7)(A)The court shall set a hearing on the merits of the petition within 10 days, at which time the court shall determine whether, by clear and convincing evidence, the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972. In making this determination, the court shall consider all evidence properly before it, including any report from the county behavioral health agency ordered pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) and any additional admissible evidence presented by the parties, including the petition submitted and any statement given by the original petitioner. A licensed behavioral health professional may testify as an expert concerning whether the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972 provided that the court finds that the professional has special knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education sufficient to qualify as an expert under Section 720 of the Evidence Code.
(B)The hearing on the merits of the petition may be conducted concurrently with the initial appearance upon stipulation of the successor petitioner and the respondent, subject to the approval by the court.
(c)(1)If, at the hearing on the merits of the petition, the court finds there is not clear and convincing evidence that the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972, the court shall dismiss the case without prejudice, unless the court makes a finding, in open court, that the original petitioners filing was not in good faith, in which case the dismissal shall be with prejudice.
(2)If, at the hearing on the merits of the petition, the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency to work with the respondent, the respondents counsel, and the supporter to engage the respondent in behavioral health treatment and attempt to enter into a CARE agreement. The court shall set a case management hearing within 14 days.
(3)If the respondent is enrolled in a federally recognized Indian tribe, the respondent shall provide notice of the case management hearing to the tribe, subject to the consent of the respondent.
(d)The following shall apply to any written report submitted by a county behavioral health agency to the court pursuant to this section:
(1)The report is confidential and not subject to disclosure or inspection under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(2)The report is inadmissible in any subsequent legal proceeding, except upon motion of the respondent in that subsequent legal proceeding.
(3)The report shall be confidential pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 5976.5.
(4)This subdivision shall not affect the applicability of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 5977.1, make admissible any evidence that is not otherwise admissible, or permit a witness to base an opinion on any matter that is not a proper basis for such an opinion. The admission or exclusion of evidence shall be pursuant to the rules of evidence established by the Evidence Code, including, but not limited to, Section 352 of the Evidence Code, and by judicial decision.
SEC. 2.This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
The CARE Act took effect in October 2023, and therefore important changes to the act must take effect immediately to ensure the CARE Acts success in providing timely assistance to respondents.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2025 | Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 528, Statutes of 2025. |
| Oct 10, 2025 | Approved by the Governor. |
| Sep 23, 2025 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m. |
| Sep 12, 2025 | Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2989.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling. |
| Sep 12, 2025 | In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending. |
| Sep 11, 2025 | Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 3339.) Ordered to the Senate. |
| Sep 3, 2025 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Sep 2, 2025 | Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading. |
| Aug 29, 2025 | From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (August 29). |
| Aug 20, 2025 | August 20 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file. |
| Jul 17, 2025 | Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Jul 16, 2025 | From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 15). |
| Jul 9, 2025 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (July 8). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. |
| Jul 2, 2025 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. |
| Jun 17, 2025 | From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD. |
| Jun 11, 2025 | June 17 hearing postponed by committee. |
| Jun 5, 2025 | Referred to Com. on JUD. |
| May 28, 2025 | In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk. |
| May 27, 2025 | Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1237.) Ordered to the Assembly. |
| Apr 10, 2025 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Apr 9, 2025 | From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 704.) (April 8). |
| Apr 1, 2025 | Set for hearing April 8. |
| Jan 29, 2025 | Referred to Com. on JUD. |
| Dec 3, 2024 | From printer. May be acted upon on or after January 2. |
| Dec 2, 2024 | Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2025 | Unfinished Business SB27 Umberg Concurrence | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Sep 11, 2025 | SB 27 Umberg Senate Third Reading By Gipson | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Aug 29, 2025 | Do pass as amended. | Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Jul 15, 2025 | Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety |
Passed |
|
| Jul 8, 2025 | Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Public Safety] | Assembly Standing Committee on Health |
Passed |
|
| Jul 1, 2025 | Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Health] | Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary |
Passed |
|
| May 27, 2025 | Senate 3rd Reading SB27 Umberg Urgency Clause | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Apr 8, 2025 | Do pass | Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| a coalition of civil rights groups and disability advocates | ** Against | |
| a coalition of disability rights advocates and mental health advocates | ** Against | |
| Alameda County Families Advocating for The Seriously Mentally Ill | ** Support | |
| Cal Voices | ** Against | |
| CalChamber | ** Support | |
| California Advocates for SMI | ** Support | |
| California Association of Mental Health Peer Run Organizations | ** Against | |
| California Association of Social Rehabilitation Agencies | ** Against | |
| California Big City Mayors Coalition | ** Support | |
| California Chamber Of Commerce | ** Support | |
| California Foundation For Independent Living Centers | ** Against | |
| California Peer Watch | ** Against | |
| California Retailers Association | ** Support | |
| California State Association of Psychiatrists | ** Support | |
| California State Association Of Public Administrators, Public Guardians, And Public Conservators | ** Against | |
| California Youth Empowerment Network | ** Against | |
| City of Bakersfield | ** Support | |
| City Of San Diego | ** Support | |
| County Behavioral Health Directors Association | ** Against | |
| County of Fresno | ** Against | |
| County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors | ** Support | |
| County of San Joaquin | ** Against | |
| Disability Rights California | ** Against | |
| Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund | ** Against | |
| Drug Policy Alliance | ** Against | |
| Hand in Hand | ** Against | |
| Homeless Union for Friendship and Freedom | ** Against | |
| Kelechi Ubozoh Consulting | ** Against | |
| Law Project for Psychiatric Rights | ** Against | |
| Mental Health America of California | ** Against | |
| National Health Law Program | ** Against | |
| Orange County Business Council | ** Support | |
| Other counties | ** Against | |
| Racial and Ethnic Mental Health Disparities Coalition | ** Against | |
| some California cities and counties | ** Support | |
| The Coelho Center for Disability Law, Policy, and Innovation | ** Against | |
| Treatment Advocacy Center | ** Support | |
| Venice Justice Committee | ** Against | |
| western center on law & poverty | ** Against | |
| Western Regional Advocacy Project | ** Against |
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | SB 27 |
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Bill No: SB 27
Author: Umberg (D)
Amended: 9/2/25 in Assembly
Vote: 21
Prior votes not relevant, pursuant to Senate rule 29.10.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 74-0, 9/11/25 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Court Program
SOURCE: Author
DIGEST:
This bill makes changes to the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act including program eligibility and how respondents are referred, among other changes.
Assembly Amendments
of 9/2/25 make numerous changes to Penal (Pen.) Code provision dealing with diversion from criminal proceedings of persons who are found incompetent to stand trial and referred to a CARE Act court; expand the mental health criteria for a person to be eligible for participation in the CARE program to include bipolar disorder; and include a nurse practitioner and physician assistant as a licensed behavioral health professional for purposes of individuals authorized to prepare an affidavit supporting a CARE process petition, among other significant expansions of the bill.
ANALYSIS:
Existing Law:
- Provides that a person shall not be tried or adjudged to punishment while mentally incompetent. (Pen. Code, § 1367, subd. (a).)
- States that a defendant is incompetent to stand trial (IST) if, as a result of a mental health disorder or developmental disability, they cannot understand the nature of the criminal proceedings or assist counsel in their defense in a rational manner. (Pen. Code, § 1367, subd. (a).)
- Specifies procedures for inquiring into and determining mental competence, including suspending criminal proceedings, as specified. (Pen. Code, § 1368, subd. (b) & (c).)
- Requires, if the defendant is found mentally competent, the criminal process to resume, and the trial on the offense charges to proceed. (Pen. Code, §§ 1370; 1370.01.)
- Establishes the procedures for the treatment of individuals found IST and charged with a misdemeanor, as follows:
- The trial, judgment, or hearing on the alleged misdemeanor is suspended and the court must conduct a hearing on whether the defendant is eligible for mental health diversion;
- If the court finds that the defendant is not eligible for diversion, the court must hold a hearing to determine which of the following actions to take:
- Order modification of an existing mental health diversion treatment plan in accordance with a recommendation from a treatment provider;
- Refer the defendant to outpatient treatment;
- Refer defendant for possible conservatorship proceedings;
- Refer the defendant to the CARE program; or,
- Dismiss the charges if the defendant does not qualify for these services; and,
- If the misdemeanor charges are dismissed, and the individual is not receiving the above-described services, the court must notify the defendant of their need for mental health services. The court shall additionally provide the individual with contact information of specified mental health services. (Pen. Code, §§ 1370.01, 1370.2; Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5623.6, subd. (b); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 4.130, subds. (f)(1) & (3).)
- The trial, judgment, or hearing on the alleged misdemeanor is suspended and the court must conduct a hearing on whether the defendant is eligible for mental health diversion;
- States the Legislature’s intent that the court consider all treatment options, as provided, prior to dismissing criminal charges, but allows the court to dismiss any misdemeanor charges pending against a defendant found IST in the interests of justice. (Pen. Code, §§ 1370.01, subd. (e), 1385.)
- States the Legislature’s intent that a defendant subject to the misdemeanor IST procedures receive mental health treatment in a treatment facility and not a jail. (Pen. Code, § 1370.01, subd. (c).)
- Allows the court to dismiss any misdemeanor charges pending against a defendant found IST. (Pen. Code, § 1370.2.)
- Requires the court to dismiss the criminal charges at the end of the diversion period if the individual performs satisfactorily on diversion. (Pen. Code, § 1370.01, subd. (e).)
- Establishes mental health diversion for misdemeanor and felony offenses and sets forth eligibility requirements. (Pen. Code, §§ 1001.35 & 1001.36.)
- Establishes the CARE Act, which must be implemented as specified. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5970 et seq.)
- Provides that a respondent may qualify for the CARE process only if all of the following criteria are met:
- The person is 18 years of age or older.
- The person is currently experiencing a severe mental illness, as defined, and has a diagnosis identified in the disorder class: schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, as defined in the most current version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Specifically exempts specified other conditions or disorders.
- The person is not clinically stabilized in on-going voluntary treatment.
- At least one of the following is true:
- The person is unlikely to survive safely in the community without supervision and the person's condition is substantially deteriorating.
- The person is in need of services and supports in order to prevent a relapse or deterioration that would be likely to result in grave disability or serious harm to the person or to others.
- Participation in a CARE plan or agreement would be the least restrictive alternative necessary to ensure the person's recovery and stability.
- It is likely that the person will benefit from participation in a CARE plan or agreement. (Welfare (Welf.) & Institutions (Inst.) Code, § 5972.)
- The person is 18 years of age or older.
- Allows a petition to initiate a CARE proceeding to be brought by one of the following adults:
- A person with whom the respondent resides or a spouse, parent, sibling, child, or grandparent of the respondent, or another individual who stands in loco parentis to the respondent.
- The director of a hospital, or their designee, in which the respondent is hospitalized, or the director of a public or charitable organization, agency, or home, or their designee, that is currently, or within the previous 30 days, providing behavioral health services to the respondent or in whose institution the respondent resides.
- A licensed behavioral health professional, or their designee, who is treating, or has been treating within the last 30 days, the respondent for a mental illness.
- A first responder, including a peace officer, firefighter, paramedic, emergency medical technician, mobile crisis response worker, or homeless outreach worker who has had repeated interactions with the respondent in the form of multiple arrests, multiple detentions, as provided, multiple attempts to engage the respondent in voluntary treatment or other repeated efforts to aid the respondent in obtaining professional assistance.
- The public guardian or public conservator, or their designee (and a respondent may be referred from conservatorship proceedings).
- The director of a county behavioral health agency of the county in which the respondent resides or is present (and a respondent may be referred from assisted outpatient treatment proceedings).
- The director of the county Adult Protective Services or their designee.
- The director of a California Indian health services program, California tribal behavioral health department, or their designee.
- The judge of a tribal court that is located in California, or their designee.
- The respondent. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5974.)
- A person with whom the respondent resides or a spouse, parent, sibling, child, or grandparent of the respondent, or another individual who stands in loco parentis to the respondent.
- Requires the Judicial Council to develop a mandatory form for use to file a CARE process petition with the court and any other forms necessary for the CARE process; and request the petition to be signed under the penalty of perjury and contain specified information, including one of the following:
- An affidavit of a licensed behavioral health professional, stating that the licensed behavioral health professional or their designee has examined the respondent within 60 days of the submission of the petition, or has made multiple attempts to examine, but has not been successful in eliciting the cooperation of the respondent to submit to an examination, within 60 days of the petition, and that the licensed behavioral health professional had determined that the respondent meets, or has reason to believe, explained with specificity in the affidavit, that the respondent meets the diagnostic criteria for CARE proceedings.
- Evidence that the respondent was detained for a minimum of two intensive treatments pursuant to Article 4 (commencing with Section 5250) of Chapter 2 of Part 1, the most recent one within the previous 60 days. Evidence may include, but is not limited to, documentary evidence from the facility where the respondent was detained, or a signed declaration from the petitioner if the petitioner had personal knowledge of the detentions. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5975.)
- An affidavit of a licensed behavioral health professional, stating that the licensed behavioral health professional or their designee has examined the respondent within 60 days of the submission of the petition, or has made multiple attempts to examine, but has not been successful in eliciting the cooperation of the respondent to submit to an examination, within 60 days of the petition, and that the licensed behavioral health professional had determined that the respondent meets, or has reason to believe, explained with specificity in the affidavit, that the respondent meets the diagnostic criteria for CARE proceedings.
- Sets out the respondent's rights, including the right to be represented by counsel at all stages of a CARE proceeding, and requires the court to appoint specified counsel if the respondent does not have their own attorney. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5976.)
- Provides that all CARE Act hearings are presumptively closed to the public. Allows the respondent to demand that the hearings be public or request the presence of a family member or friend without waiving their right to keep the hearing closed to the general public. A request by another party to make a hearing public may be granted if the court finds that the public interest clearly outweighs the respondent's privacy interest. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5976.5.)
- Requires, for all CARE Act proceedings, that the judge control all hearings with a view to the expeditious and effective ascertainment of the jurisdictional facts and the ascertainment of all information relative to the present condition and future welfare of the respondent. Except where there is a contested issue of fact or law, requires the proceedings to be conducted in an informal, non-adversarial atmosphere with a view to obtaining the maximum cooperation of the respondent, all persons interested in the respondent's welfare, and all other parties, with any provisions that the court may make for the disposition and care of the respondent. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.4, subd. (a).)
- Requires the court, upon receipt of a CARE Act petition, to promptly review the petition to see if it makes a prima facie showing that the respondent is or may be a person eligible for services under the CARE Act. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977, subd. (a)(1).)
- Provides that, if the court finds the petitioner has not made a prima facie showing that the respondent is or may be a person who is eligible for services under the CARE Act, the court shall dismiss without prejudice, except if the court finds that the petition is without merit, or intended to harass the respondent. Allows a petition to be refiled with new information. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977, subd. (a)(2).)
- Provides that, if the court finds the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that the respondent is or may be a person who is eligible for services under the CARE Act, and the petitioner is the county behavioral health agency, the court shall do all of the following: (i) set the matter for an initial appearance; (ii) appoint counsel; (iii) determine if the petition includes all the required information and, if not, order the county to submit a report with the information; and (iv) require notice be provided. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977, subd. (a)(3)(A).)
- Provides that, if the court finds the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that the respondent is or may be a person who is eligible for services under the CARE Act, and the petitioner is not the county behavioral health agency, the court shall order the county agency to investigate whether the respondent meets the eligibility criteria of the CARE Act and is willing to engage voluntarily with the county, file a written report with the court, and provide notice, as required by the Act. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977, subd. (a)(3)(B).)
- Provides that if the county agency is making progress to engage the respondent, the agency may request up to an additional 30 days to continue to engage and enroll the individual in treatment and services. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977, subd. (a)(4).)
- Requires, within five days of the receipt of the investigative report described above, the court to review the report and do one of the following:
- If the court determines that voluntary engagement with the respondent is effective, as provided, requires the court to dismiss the matter.
- If the court determines that the county's report supports the petition's prima facie showing that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, and engagement is not effective, requires the court to: (i) set an initial hearing within 14 days; (ii) appoint counsel, unless the respondent has their own counsel; and (iii) provide notice of the hearing, as provided.
- If the court determines that the county's report does not support the petition's prima facie showing that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, requires the court to dismiss the matter. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977, subd. (a)(5).)
- If the court determines that voluntary engagement with the respondent is effective, as provided, requires the court to dismiss the matter.
- Provides that at the initial hearing:
- If the petitioner is not present, allows the court to dismiss the matter.
- If the respondent elects not to waive their appearance and is not present, allows the court to conduct the hearing in the respondent's absence if the court makes a finding on the record that reasonable attempts to elicit the attendance of the respondent have failed, and conducting the hearing without the participation or presence of the respondent would be in the respondent's best interest.
- Requires a county behavioral health agency representative to be present, allows a supporter to be appointed, and allows a tribal representative to attend for a respondent who is a tribal member, as provided, and subject to the respondent's consent.
- If the court finds that there is no reason to believe that the facts stated in the petition are true, requires the court to dismiss the case without prejudice, unless the court makes a finding on the record that the petitioner's filing was not in good faith.
- If the court finds that there is reason to believe that the facts stated in the petition appear to be true, requires the court to order the county behavioral health agency to work with the respondent and the respondent's counsel and CARE supporter to engage in behavioral health treatment. Requires the court to set a case management hearing within 14 days.
- If the petitioner is other than the county behavioral health director, substitutes the county behavioral health director or their designee for the petitioner, as specified.
- Requires the court to set a hearing on the merits of the petition, which may be conducted concurrently with the initial appearance on the petition upon stipulation of the petitioner and respondent and agreement by the court. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977, subd. (b).)
- If the petitioner is not present, allows the court to dismiss the matter.
- Provides that at the hearing on the merits:
- If the court finds that the petitioner has not shown, by clear and convincing evidence, that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, requires the court to dismiss the case without prejudice, unless the court makes a finding, on the record that the petitioner's filing was not in good faith.
- If the court finds that the petitioner has shown by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, requires the court to order the county behavioral health agency to work with the respondent, the respondent's counsel, and the supporter to engage in behavioral health treatment and determine if the parties will be able to enter into a CARE agreement. Requires the court to set a case management hearing. Requires notice to the tribe, if applicable. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977, subd. (c).)
- If the court finds that the petitioner has not shown, by clear and convincing evidence, that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, requires the court to dismiss the case without prejudice, unless the court makes a finding, on the record that the petitioner's filing was not in good faith.
- Provides that at the case management hearing:
- If the parties have entered, or are likely to enter, a CARE agreement, requires the court to approve or modify and approve the CARE agreement, stay the matter, and set a progress hearing for 60 days.
- If the court finds that the parties have not entered, and are not likely to enter, into a CARE agreement, requires the court to order a clinical evaluation of the respondent, as provided. Requires the evaluation to address, at a minimum, a clinical diagnosis, whether the respondent has capacity to give informed consent regarding psychotropic medication, other information, as provided, and an analysis of recommended services, programs, housing, medications, and interventions that support the respondent's recovery and stability.
- Requires the court to set a clinical evaluation hearing. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.1.)
- If the parties have entered, or are likely to enter, a CARE agreement, requires the court to approve or modify and approve the CARE agreement, stay the matter, and set a progress hearing for 60 days.
- Provides that at the clinical evaluation review hearing:
- The court shall consider the evaluation, and other evidence, including calling witnesses, but only relevant and admissible evidence that fully complies with the rules of evidence may be considered by the court.
- If the court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, after review of the evaluation and other evidence, that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, requires the court to order the county behavioral health agency, the respondent, and the respondent's counsel and supporter to jointly develop a CARE plan.
- If the court finds, in reviewing the evaluation, that clear and convincing evidence does not support that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, requires the court to dismiss the petition. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.1, subd. (c).)
- The court shall consider the evaluation, and other evidence, including calling witnesses, but only relevant and admissible evidence that fully complies with the rules of evidence may be considered by the court.
- Provides at the hearing to review the proposed CARE plan:
- The parties shall present their plan or plans to the court. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.1, subd. (d)(1).)
- The court shall adopt the elements of a CARE plan that support the recovery and stability of the respondent. Allows the court to issue any orders necessary to support the respondent in accessing appropriate services and supports, including prioritization for those services and supports, subject to applicable laws and available funding, as provided. These orders are the CARE plan. (Id. at (d)(2).)
- A court may order medication if it finds, upon review of the court-ordered evaluation and hearing from the parties that, by clear and convincing evidence, the respondent lacks the capacity to give informed consent to the administration of medically necessary stabilization medication. To the extent that the court orders medically necessary stabilization medications, prohibits the medication from being forcibly administered and the respondent's failure to comply with a medication order may not result in a penalty, including but not limited to a court order of contempt or imposition of accountability measures. (Id. at (d)(3).)
- The parties shall present their plan or plans to the court. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.1, subd. (d)(1).)
- Specifies that the above provisions do not prohibit the parties from agreeing to, and the court from approving, amendments to the CARE plan. The court may also approve amendments to the CARE plan upon the finding that those amendments are necessary to support the respondent in accessing appropriate services and supports, following a hearing on the issue. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.1, subd. (d)(7).)
- Requires that a status review hearing occur at least every 60 days during the CARE plan implementation. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.2, subd. (a)(1).)
- Requires the behavioral health agency to file with the court, and serve on the respondent and the respondent's counsel and supporter, a report not less than five court days prior to the hearing, with specified information, including progress the respondent has made on the CARE plan, what services and supports in the CARE plan were provided, and what services and supports were not provided, and any recommendations for changes to the services and supports to make the CARE plan more successful. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.2, subd. (a)(1).)
- Allows the petitioner, the respondent, or the court to request more frequent reviews as necessary to address changed circumstances. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.2, subd. (a)(1)(A) – (b).)
- Requires the court, in the 11th month, to hold a one-year status hearing, which is an evidentiary hearing, to determine if the respondent graduates from the CARE plan or should be reappointed for another year. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.3, subd. (a).)
- Requires a report by the behavioral health agency before the status conference, as provided. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.3, subd. (a)(1).)
- Allows the respondent to call witnesses and present evidence at the one-year status hearing and respondent may request to either graduate from the program or remain in the program. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.3, subd. (a)(2).)
- Requires the court to issue an order as follows:
- If the respondent elects to graduate from the program, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency and the respondent to work jointly on a voluntary graduation plan, as specified.
- If the respondent elects to accept voluntary reappointment to the program, the respondent may request to be re-appointed to the CARE program for up to one additional year, subject to meeting certain criteria and court approval. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.3, subd. (a)(3).)
- If the respondent elects to graduate from the program, the court shall order the county behavioral health agency and the respondent to work jointly on a voluntary graduation plan, as specified.
- Allows the court to involuntarily reappoint the respondent to the CARE program for up to one year if the court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that (i) the respondent did not successfully complete the CARE process; (ii) all of the required services and supports were provided to the respondent; (iii) the respondent would benefit from continuation of the CARE process; and (iv) the respondent currently meets the requirements for initial enrollment in the CARE program. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.3, subd. (b).)
- Allows the court, at any point in the proceedings, if it determines, by clear and convincing evidence, that the respondent, after receiving notice, is not participating in the CARE proceedings, to terminate respondent's participation in the CARE process. Allows the court to make a referral under the Lanterman-Petris-Short (LPS) Act, as provided. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5979, subd. (a).)
This bill:
- Provides that if a defendant is found mentally incompetent to stand trial (IST) in a misdemeanor case, the trial, judgment, or hearing on the alleged violation shall be suspended and the court shall, after notice to the defendant, defense counsel, and the prosecution, hold a hearing to determine whether to do one or more of the following:
- Conduct a hearing to determine if the defendant is eligible and suitable for mental health diversion, as specified; or,
- Refer the defendant to the CARE Act court, if the defendant or counsel for the defendant agrees to the referral and the court has reason to believe that the defendant may be eligible for the CARE program.
- Conduct a hearing to determine if the defendant is eligible and suitable for mental health diversion, as specified; or,
- Requires, if the defendant is referred to CARE court, the court to hold a hearing to determine eligibility for the CARE program within 30 court days after the date of the referral.
- Provides that if the hearing is delayed beyond 30 court days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in a county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing.
- Provides that if the defendant is accepted into the CARE program, the CARE court shall notify the criminal court of the acceptance, and the charges shall be dismissed six months after the date of the referral to the CARE program, unless the defendant’s case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that six-month time period.
- States that, except as provided in the proceedings related to an investigation of a defendant’s eligibility for CARE services or in proceedings related to Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT), the above provisions do not alter the confidential nature of CARE program proceedings.
- States that if the defendant is not accepted into the CARE program or if the CARE Act court refers the defendant back to criminal court before the expiration of the six-month time period, the court shall proceed with consideration for mental health diversion.
- Provides that if a defendant is found IST in a misdemeanor case but ineligible “or unsuitable” for diversion, the court may refer the defendant to CARE, in which case all of the following would apply:
- The CARE Act court shall hold a hearing to determine eligibility for the CARE program within 14 court days after the date of the referral.
- If the hearing is delayed beyond 14 court days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in a county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing. If the defendant is accepted into the CARE program, the CARE Act court shall notify the criminal court of the acceptance, and the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 six months after the date of the referral to the CARE program, unless the defendant’s case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that time period.
- Except as provided in the proceedings related to an investigation of a defendant’s eligibility for CARE services or in proceedings related to AOT, the above provisions do not alter the confidential nature of CARE program proceedings.
- The CARE Act court shall hold a hearing to determine eligibility for the CARE program within 14 court days after the date of the referral.
- Allows the county behavioral health agency and jail medical providers to share confidential medical records and other relevant information with the court, including, but not limited to, prior interactions with and treatment of the defendant, for the purpose of determining likelihood of eligibility for behavioral health services and programs pursuant to this section; but clarifies that the disclosure of information is subject to applicable state and federal privacy laws.
- Defines “clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment” (for purposes of the requirement that to qualify for CARE, a person must have a prerequisite mental condition and not be clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treament) to mean all of the following:
- The person’s condition is stable and not deteriorating.
- The person is currently engaged in treatment and managing symptoms through medication or other therapeutic interventions. Enrollment in treatment alone shall not be considered clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment.
- The person’s condition is stable and not deteriorating.
- Expands the criteria to qualify under the CARE Act, which is currently limited to schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, to also include “bipolar I disorder with psychotic features, except psychosis related to current intoxication.”
- Modifies “affidavit of a licensed behavioral health professional” to include, for purposes of existing law specifying the information required in the petition, nurse practitioners and physician assistants.
- States that the court may make a prima facie determination without conducting a hearing.
- Allows a CARE court in its discretion, to call additional progress hearings beyond the hearing set at 60 days, for the duration of the CARE agreement.
- Requires that in order to be “graduated” from the CARE program, the court must approve the eligible participant’s request.
- Allows a court to refer an individual from AOT or LPS or in a proceeding finding them to be IST for a misdemeanor, or IST for a felony, to CARE court.
- Provides that, in considering appropriateness of the referral, the CARE court may consider a referral made pursuant to this section to be a petition satisfying the requirements of the CARE Act if both of the following conditions are met:
- The referral contains information sufficient to otherwise satisfy the petition requirements of the CARE Act.
- The information included in the referral makes a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described as qualifying for CARE.
- The referral contains information sufficient to otherwise satisfy the petition requirements of the CARE Act.
- Requires, if the CARE court elects to consider a referral to be a petition, the CARE court to notify the referring court that the referral has been accepted as a petition for CARE proceedings.
- Requires, if the CARE Act court does not elect to consider a referral, the CARE Act court to order the appropriate petitioner candidate to do the following within 14 court days:
- Complete an investigation to determine whether to a file a petition on behalf of the referred individual.
- Notify the referring court whether it intends to file a CARE Act petition on behalf of the referred individual.
- Complete an investigation to determine whether to a file a petition on behalf of the referred individual.
- Provides that if the appropriate petitioner candidate notifies the CARE Act court that it requires additional time to complete its investigation, the CARE Act court may grant an extension of up to 30 court days.
Comments
CARE Act. SB 1338 (Umberg) Chapter 319, Statutes of 2022, established the CARE Act - a new civil court process to provide clinically appropriate, community-based services and supports that are culturally and linguistically competent, to Californians with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and other psychotic disorders, while also preserving these individuals’ self-determination to the greatest extent possible.
The CARE Act allows specific people (petitioners) to ask the court to create a voluntary CARE agreement or court-ordered CARE plan for other persons (respondents) who have certain untreated severe mental illnesses, specifically schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders. A CARE agreement or plan may include treatment, housing support, and other services. (See Judicial Council Website, https://selfhelp.courts.ca.gov/care-act/about [last viewed Sept. 6, 2025].) CARE Act proceedings involve assessments and hearings to determine whether the respondent meets eligibility requirements. A county behavioral health agency will be involved in the process. If the person qualifies for CARE, a CARE agreement or plan can be made. (Ibid.) A CARE agreement is a voluntary agreement entered into by the respondent and the county behavioral health agency after a court has found that the respondent is eligible for the CARE process. The agreement will include an individualized range of community-based services. (Ibid.) In contrast, a CARE plan is ordered by the court when a CARE agreement is not reached and a clinical evaluation indicates that the respondent meets criteria, but it includes the same elements as a CARE agreement. Stabilization medications may only be included in a CARE plan if a court finds that the respondent lacks capacity, but the CARE plan cannot force the respondent to take the stabilization medications. (Ibid.)
To be eligible under the CARE Act, a person must meet all of the following: (1) be 18 years of age or older; (2) have a serious mental illness and a diagnosis of a schizophrenia spectrum or other psychotic disorder; (3) be currently experiencing a mental illness that is severe in degree and persistent in duration, may cause behavior that interferes substantially with activities of daily living, and may lead to an inability to maintain stable adjustment and independent functioning without treatment, support, and rehabilitation for a long or indefinite period; (4) is not clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment; (5) is unlikely to survive safely in the community without supervision and the person’s condition is substantially deteriorating or they are in need of services and supports in order to prevent a relapse or deterioration that would be likely to result in grave disability or serious harm to the person or others, (6) CARE would be the least restrictive alternative necessary to ensure the person’s recovery and stability; and, (7) is not likely that the person will benefit from participation in CARE.
This bill would expand eligibility for CARE which is currently limited to schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, to additionally include bipolar I disorder with psychotic features, except psychosis related to current intoxication.
The first step in the CARE Act process is a petition submitted by a family member, mental health provider, or first responder, among others, with the court. The court then orders a clinical evaluation and appoints both an attorney and a “CARE Supporter” (a person assigned to help the participant understand the CARE Act process and provide the respondent with as much autonomy as is feasible). If the CARE Act court finds that respondent meets the criteria for the program, then the court orders the respondent, CARE Supporter, and county behavioral health agency to develop a CARE Plan. The court then reviews the plan, and if approved, it becomes a court order lasting up to 12 months. Eventually, the participant “graduates” from the CARE program, although they may be provided with ongoing services, including assistance with finding housing. “Graduation” from CARE is designed to occur when a person in need of CARE services, including those who are mentally ill and unhoused, obtains housing of some sort. Existing law provides that when a participant elects to be graduated from the program, the court “shall order” preparation of a graduation plan for that person.
This bill makes several changes to CARE Act court procedures in addition to the IST referrals previously discussed above. The bill would clarify that no hearing is necessary to determine prima facie evidence of eligibility. This bill would authorize the CARE court to direct that an investigation be conducted if information in the referral does not provide all of the information necessary for a petition. This bill would clarify that the court may, in its discretion, call additional progress hearings beyond the hearing set at 60 days, for the duration of the CARE agreement. And, significantly, this bill amends existing procedures for graduation from CARE proceedings to require court approval of the respondent’s request to graduate from the program.
Mental Competency in Misdemeanor Criminal Proceedings. The Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution prohibits the criminal prosecution of a defendant who is not mentally competent to stand trial. Existing law provides that if a person has been charged with a crime and is not able to understand the nature of the criminal proceedings and/or is not able to assist counsel in his or her defense, the court may determine that the offender is IST. (Pen. Code § 1367.) When the court issues an order for a hearing into the present mental competence of the defendant, all proceedings in the criminal prosecution are suspended until the question of competence has been determined. (Pen. Code, §1368, subd. (c).)
In order to determine mental competence, the court must appoint a psychiatrist or licensed psychologist to examine the defendant. If defense counsel opposes a finding on incompetence, the court must appoint two experts: one chosen by the defense, one by the prosecution. (Pen. Code, § 11369, subd. (a).) The examining expert(s) must evaluate the defendant's alleged mental disorder and the defendant's ability to understand the proceedings and assist counsel, as well as address whether antipsychotic medication is medically appropriate. (Pen. Code, § 1369, subd. (a).)
Both parties have a right to a jury trial to decide competency. (Pen. Code, § 1369.) A formal trial is not required when jury trial has been waived. (People v. Harris (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 984.) The burden of proof is on the party seeking a finding of incompetence. (People v. Skeirik (1991) 229 Cal.App.3d 444, 459-460.) Because a defendant is initially considered competent to stand trial (Medina v. California (1992) 505 U.S. 437), usually this means that the defense bears the burden of establishing incompetence. Therefore, defense counsel must first present evidence to support mental incompetence. However, if defense counsel does not want to offer evidence to have the defendant declared incompetent, the prosecution may. Each party may offer rebuttal evidence. Final arguments are presented to the court or jury, with the prosecution going first, followed by defense counsel. (Pen. Code, § 1369, subds. (b)-(e).)
For defendants charged with a felony, if after an examination and hearing the defendant is found IST, the criminal proceedings are suspended and the court shall order the defendant to be referred to Department of State Hospital (DSH), LPS or to any other available public or private treatment facility, including a community-based residential treatment system if the facility has a secured perimeter or a locked and controlled treatment facility, approved by the community program director that will promote the defendant's speedy restoration to mental competence, or placed on outpatient status, except as specified. (Pen. Code § 1368, subd. (c) and 1370, subd. (a)(1)(B).) The court may also make a determination as to whether the defendant is an appropriate candidate for mental health diversion pursuant to Penal Code section 1001.36.
The maximum term of commitment for an IST defendant charged with a felony is two-years, however, no later than 90 days prior to the expiration of the defendant's term of commitment, if the defendant has not regained mental competence shall be returned to the committing court and the court shall not order the defendant returned to the custody of DSH. (Pen. Code, § 1370, subd. (c)(1).) With the exception of proceedings alleging a violation of mandatory supervision, the criminal action may be dismissed in the interests of justice. (Pen. Code, § 1370, subd. (d).)
For defendants charged with a misdemeanor, if the defendant is found IST, the proceedings shall be suspended and the court may do either of the following: 1) conduct a hearing to determine whether the defendant is eligible for mental health diversion; or 2) dismiss the charges pursuant to Penal Code section 1385. If the charges are dismissed, the court shall transmit a copy of the order to county behavioral health director or the director's designee. (Pen. Code, § 1370.01, subd. (b).)
If a misdemeanor defendant is found eligible for diversion, the court may grant diversion for a period not to exceed one year from the date the individual is accepted into diversion or the maximum term of imprisonment provided by law for the most serious offense charged in the complaint, whichever is shorter. (Pen. Code, § 1370.01, subd. (b)(1)(A).)
If the court finds that the defendant is not eligible for diversion, the court may, after notice to the defendant, defense counsel, and the prosecution, hold a hearing to determine whether to do any of the following: 1) order modification of the treatment plan in accordance with a recommendation from the treatment provider; 2) refer the defendant to assisted outpatient treatment (AOT); if the defendant is accepted into AOT, the charges shall be dismissed; 3) refer the defendant to the county conservatorship investigator for possible conservatorship if the defendant appears to be gravely disabled, as defined; if a conservatorship is established, the charges shall be dismissed; or 4) refer the defendant to the CARE program; if the defendant is accepted into CARE the charges shall be dismissed. (Pen. Code, § 1370.01, subd. (b)(1)(D).)
The bill allows a criminal court to refer the defendant—even if eligible for diversion--to CARE court. However, this bill states that the referral is contingent on both the defense agreeing to the referral as well as the court having reason to believe the person is eligible. Additionally, this bill provides that if the person is not accepted into the CARE program or if the CARE court refers the defendant back to criminal court before the expiration of the six-month time period, the court shall proceed as it normally would have with considering the defendant for diversion.
Supporters of this bill state that a subset of misdemeanor IST defendant who are likely to be eligible for CARE and are also likely to be found not suitable for mental health diversion would benefit from an earlier referral to CARE instead of considering mental health diversion first, and then moving into other options including CARE. They argue that oftentimes the defendant is waiting up to 30 days for a hearing on whether they will be granted diversion and then released on their own recognizance. Locating these individuals can be difficult for the behavioral health agency if they have been released.
However, opponents of this bill, which include the Behavioral Health Directors, argue that this does not give them enough time to work up the petition or collaborate with the court and defense counsel and prosecutors to determine whether a person would be a good candidate for CARE court, which could also lead to delays once a person is referred.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: Yes
According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee:
Cost pressures to the courts (Trial Court Trust Fund (TCTF), General Fund (GF)) of an unknown but significant amount, possibly in the millions to tens of millions of dollars, to adjudicate petitions for the population made eligible for the CARE program by this bill and handle IST referrals between criminal and CARE courts. The bill streamlines some CARE court processes which may help offset these cost pressures to some extent. It generally costs approximately $1,000 to operate a courtroom for one hour. Although courts are not funded on the basis of workload, increased pressure on the TCTF may create a demand for increased funding for courts from the GF. The fiscal year 2025-26 state budget provides $82 million ongoing GF to the TCTF for court operations.
Costs to the counties (local funds, GF), likely in the tens of millions of dollars or higher annually, to serve the population made eligible for the CARE program by this bill, handle additional IST referrals, and participate in required court processes. The County Behavioral Health Directors Association (CBHDA), which opposes this bill, anticipates these costs will be between $78 million and $121 million annually ongoing to county health agencies, largely depending on the number of CARE respondents with bipolar I disorder with psychotic features and the number of additional IST referrals to the CARE program. CBHDA also expects significant, unknown county costs in addition to these estimates to implement the bill immediately due to the urgency clause. The state must reimburse these county costs from the GF if the Commission on State Mandates determines the duties imposed by this bill constitute a reimbursable state mandate.
Costs (GF, federal funds (FF)) to Department of Health Care Services (DHCS). DHCS anticipates one-time costs of $4 million in fiscal year (FY) 2026-27 to contract to update its training materials and develop and provide new training and technical assistance for counties, courts, and CARE respondents’ counsel. DHCA also anticipates needing two full-time, permanent positions for data collection, oversight activities, and quality assurance, at a cost of $317,000 ($159,000 GF and $158,000 FF) in FY 2026-27 and $299,000 ($150,000 GF and $149,000 FF) in FY 2027-28 and ongoing. DHCS reports any shortfall in federal funds would have to be made up from the GF.
Costs (GF) of an unknown but potentially significant amount to California Health and Human Services Agency (CalHHS) to expand its existing activities to cover the population made eligible for the CARE program by this bill.
SUPPORT: (Verified 9/12/25)
Alameda County Families Advocating for the Seriously Mentally Ill
Calchamber
California Advocates for SMI
California Big City Mayors Coalition
California Chamber of Commerce
California Retailers Association
California State Association of Psychiatrists
City of Bakersfield
City of San Diego
Orange County Business Council
Treatment Advocacy Center
OPPOSITION: (Verified 9/12/25)
Cal Voices
California Association of Mental Health Peer Run Organizations
California Association of Social Rehabilitation Agencies
California Foundation for Independent Living Centers
California State Association of Public Administrators, Public Guardians, and
Public Conservators
California Youth Empowerment Network
County Behavioral Health Directors Association
County of Fresno
County of San Joaquin
Disability Rights California
Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund
Drug Policy Alliance
Hand in Hand
Homeless Union for Friendship and Freedom
Kelechi Ubozoh Consulting
Law Project for Psychiatric Rights
Mental Health America of California
National Health Law Program
Racial and Ethnic Mental Health Disparities Coalition
The Coelho Center for Disability Law Policy and Innovation
Venice Justice Committee
Western Center on Law & Poverty
Western Regional Advocacy Project
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT:
According to Big City Mayors:
Our cities remain deeply committed to connecting vulnerable individuals with the behavioral health services they need. SB 27 strengthens the CARE Court process by speeding up initial proceedings, expanding eligibility, and providing greater clarity—ensuring individuals with serious mental health challenges receive timely and effective care. We appreciate Senator Umberg’s leadership in advancing these critical improvements.
Through the passage of SB 1338 (Umberg, 2022), the State of California took an important step in connecting individuals struggling with serious, untreated mental illness with court-ordered treatment plans through the CARE Court Program. CARE Court has been successful in getting some individuals into a CARE program, but further work to ensure proper implementation is necessary.
Under current law, when a defendant is found mentally incompetent to stand trial for a misdemeanor (MIST), the court may hold a hearing to determine their eligibility for diversion. Only if the individual is ineligible for diversion may they be referred to CARE Court—despite being part of a population that could benefit significantly from CARE services.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION:
According to the County Behavioral Health Directors Association:
Introduced on the first day of the 2025-2026 legislative session, December 2, 2024, with minimal contents, SB 27 (Umberg) was substantially amended on June 17, 2025, to propose a significant expansion of referrals into as well as individuals eligible for CARE Court. CARE Court is currently in the process of being implemented by county behavioral health and courts across all 58 counties. While county behavioral health agencies are proud of the work we have done to successfully implement CARE Court thus far, we have significant concerns about the proposed changes proposed by this bill. Specifically, this bill would:
- Expand CARE eligibility to include all mood disorders with psychotic
features.
- This change would rapidly and increase by significant magnitudes the populations eligible for CARE Court absent the time, resources, expanded workforce, capacity, or housing needed to accomplish this massive expansion.
- The general population with some form of mood disorders is approximately 9.7%1 in any given year, whereas the population with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders is between 0.33 and 0.75%2. The population experiencing bipolar disorder in any given year is closer to 2.8%3.
- Considering the significantly larger prevalence of mood disorders when compared with thought disorders, this expansion would require significant time and resourcing to accomplish at scale.
- A shift to include all mood disorders would also represent a fundamental change in the goals of the CARE Act, which have not been discussed to date with clinicians and practitioners.
- Finally, our subject matter experts currently engaged in implementing CARE Court stressed the importance of having housing readily available for those individuals we engage into treatment and services. If housing is not on hand, we can miss a crucial window of opportunity in working with clients for whom housing is an urgent need.
- Deems a referral from criminal courts for felonies or misdemeanors,
conservatorship or Assertive Outpatient Treatment (AOT) as comparable to a CARE Court petition.
- The bill proposes to eliminate the requirement for a petition to be filed when individuals are referred by a variety of sources to CARE Court, including for misdemeanor Incompetent to Stand Trial (IST), felony IST, conservatorships, and AOT. This rapid leapfrogging over important court processes skips steps. Fundamental to existing court practice. This will also compromise counties’ ability to locate and engage individuals into CARE Court, which is arguably one of the most effective interventions to date supported through the CARE Court program.
- Require any individual with a misdemeanor who is found Incompetent to Stand Trial (IST) to be considered for CARE Court, in addition to diversion.
- Currently, when individuals with misdemeanor charges deemed IST are released prior to coming to the attention of county behavioral health, counties are rarely able to subsequently locate the individual….
- Adopt a series of procedural changes to the court process which do not make sense to counties currently engaged in CARE Court.
- Our subject matter experts did not understand the basis or rationale for changes to WIC Section 5977 which seek to merge the initial hearing with the hearing to determine the prima facie determination concurrently. They were uncertain how to implement this. Additional information on the need for this and how it is envisioned would be helpful to practitioners.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 74-0, 9/11/25
AYES: Addis, Aguiar-Curry, Ahrens, Alanis, Alvarez, Arambula, Ávila Farías, Bains, Bauer-Kahan, Bennett, Berman, Boerner, Bonta, Calderon, Caloza, Carrillo, Castillo, Chen, Connolly, Davies, DeMaio, Elhawary, Ellis, Flora, Fong, Gabriel, Gallagher, Gipson, Jeff Gonzalez, Mark González, Hadwick, Haney, Harabedian, Hart, Hoover, Irwin, Jackson, Johnson, Kalra, Krell, Lowenthal, Macedo, McKinnor, Muratsuchi, Nguyen, Ortega, Pacheco, Papan, Patel, Patterson, Pellerin, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Ransom, Celeste Rodriguez, Michelle Rodriguez, Rogers, Blanca Rubio, Schiavo, Schultz, Sharp-Collins, Solache, Soria, Stefani, Ta, Tangipa, Valencia, Wallis, Ward, Wicks, Wilson, Zbur, Rivas
NO VOTE RECORDED: Bryan, Dixon, Garcia, Lackey, Lee, Sanchez
Prepared by: Sandy Uribe / PUB. S. /
9/12/25 11:09:09
**** END ****
SENATE THIRD READING
STR Bill Id:SB 27
Author:(Umberg)
As Amended Ver:September 02, 2025
Majority Vote
SUMMARY
Proposes a number of changes to the still newly implemented Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act to modify the process (including how respondents are referred, determined by the CARE Act court to be eligible for participation, and graduated from the program) and eligibility criteria for the program.
Major Provisions
- Provides that if a defendant is found mentally incompetent to stand trial in a misdemeanor case, the trial, judgment, or hearing on the alleged violation shall be suspended and the court shall, after notice to the defendant, defense counsel, and the prosecution, hold a hearing to determine whether, to do one or more of the following:
- Conduct a hearing to determine if the defendant is ″eligible and suitable″ for diversion and in that case, grant diversion for a period not to exceed one year from the date the individual is accepted into diversion or the maximum term of imprisonment provided by law for the most serious offense charged in the misdemeanor complaint, whichever is shorter.
- Refer the defendant to the CARE Act court, if the court has reason to believe that the defendant may be eligible for the CARE program.
- Provides that if a defendant is found mentally incompetent to stand trial in a misdemeanor case but ineligible ″or unsuitable″ for diversion, the court may refer the defendant to CARE, in which case specified condititions would apply.
- Allows the county behavioral health agency and jail medical providers to share confidential medical records and other relevant information with the court, including, but not limited to, prior interactions with and treatment of the defendant, for the purpose of determining likelihood of eligibility for behavioral health services and programs pursuant to this section; but clarifies that the disclosure of information is subject to applicable state and federal privacy laws.
- Defines ″clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment″ (for purposes of the requirement that to qualify for CARE, a person must have a prerequisite mental condition and not be clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treament) to mean both of the following:
- The person′s condition is stable and not deteriorating.
- The person is likely to survive safely in the community without supervision; but enrollment in treatment alone shall not be considered clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment.
- Modifies the criteria to qualify for CARE (limited to schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders under current law) to include ″bipolar I disorder with psychotic features, except psychosis related to current intoxication.″
- Clarifies that a court may make a prima facie determination as to a respondent′s CARE eligibility without holding a separate hearing.
- Allows a CARE court in its discretion, to call additional progress hearings beyond the hearing set at 60 days, for the duration of the CARE agreement.
- Requires that if the respondent has successfully completed the CARE process, the court shall order the preparation of a voluntary graduation plan.
- Allows a court to refer an individual from Assisted Outpatient Therapy (AOT) or Lanterman-Petris-Short (LPS) conservatorship or in a proceeding finding them to be incompetent to stand trial for a misdemeanor, or incompetent to stand trial for a felony, to CARE Act court.
- Provides that the CARE Act court may consider a referral made pursuant to 9) to be a CARE Act petition if it contained all of the information required by law to be included in a CARE Act petition.
- Requires, if the CARE Act court elects to consider a referral to be a petition pursuant to 9), the CARE Act court to notify the referring court that the referral has been accepted as a petition for CARE Act proceedings and to take other actions in the event that the referral were not accepted.
COMMENTS
Senate Bill 1338 (Umberg), Chapter 319, Statutes of 2022, established the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act, which provides community-based behavioral health services and supports by means of a civil court process to Californians living with untreated schizophrenia spectrum or other psychotic disorders who meet certain health and safety conditions. The CARE Act is intended to serve as an upstream intervention for individuals experiencing severe impairment to prevent more restrictive alternatives, including psychiatric hospitalizations, incarceration, Assisted Outpatient Therapy (AOT), and Lanterman-Petris-Short (LPS) conservatorship. This bill is the latest in a series of annual bills to modify the CARE Act which has been in effect statewide since December 1, 2024. The bill proposes a number of changes to the CARE Act, modifying not only the process (including how respondents are referred to, determined to be eligible for participation, and graduated from the program), but also the criteria for program eligibility.
Background – CARE Proceedings. A central feature of the CARE Act are ″CARE Courts,″ intended to deliver mental health and substance use disorder (SUD) services as an alternative to incarceration in a jail or psychiatric facility of a person with schizophrenia or another psychotic disorder, or to that person becoming subject to an LPS conservatorship. The CARE Act provides for court-ordered CARE Plans for persons suffering from a mental health or SUD crisis for up to 12 months, with possible extensions. The plan is supposed to provide individuals with clinically appropriate, community-based services. These might include court-ordered stabilization medications, wellness and recovery support, help with finding social services and housing. ″Court-ordered stabilization medication″ is distinct from involuntary medication in that it cannot be forcibly administered. However, failure of a person to voluntarily participate in the medication treatment could lead to their referral to an LPS conservatorship, which critics say is coercive.
Since its inception, a central premise of the CARE Act is to focus on the most severely mentally ill, including those with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, in a collaborative and voluntary manner. While the overall purpose of the CARE Act is to provide essential services to the most severely ill, it also is supposed to preserve self-determination to the greatest extent possible. The California Health and Human Services Agency describes CARE Court as ″an upstream diversion to prevent more restrictive conservatorships or incarceration.″ (″CARE Court FAQ,″ at chhs.ca.gov.) The program is designed and intended to be voluntary and collaborative. Unlike the courts in AOT and LPS proceedings, CARE Act courts do not have the authority to order a respondent in CARE proceedings to be medicated over their objection.
Critics point out that CARE is expensive, especially in light of the small number of participants it serves. According to a November 2024 report by the California Department of Health Care Services about the first 9 months of the program′s implementation in the 8 early implementation counties and Los Angeles (which opted to begin the CARE program early, despite not being identified in statute as an early implementing county), found the following (with preliminary data from Q3 of 2024 and preliminary yearly totals included in brackets):
557 petitions filed in the state [+231 = 788]
217 petitions dismissed
100 participants were in the program
362 individuals ″diverted″ from CARE Court to services.
(CARE Early Implementation Report, pp. 6-9, available at https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/Documents/CARE-Early-Implementation-Report-10-31.pdf.)
Meanwhile, during that same period (FY 2023-24), the state allocated $38.1 million to the courts and $33.3 million to the California Health and Human Services Agency (CalHHS) and Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) (for data collection, county grants, and other activities), for a total of $71.3 million. (LAO (September 10, 2024) The 2024-25 California Spending Plan: Judiciary and Criminal Justice, available at https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/4924.) Divided by the 100 CARE Act participants, the cost of CARE court during FY 2023-24 was $713,000 per participant. Future participation may increase (especially if the criteria for eligibility is greatly expanded, as proposed by this bill), but costs also are likely to increase over time. Supporters of the CARE Act point out that many persons who do not qualify for, or who opt out of participation in CARE, are diverted to other services. But regardless of its effectiveness in directing individuals to services—as participants, or individuals who are diverted elsewhere- the CARE model ends up being a very expensive way to coordinate (but not directly provide) important services.
This bill makes several significant changes to CARE Act court procedures, as well as the procedures for other courts to refer individuals to a CARE Act court, that are in the jurisdiction of this Committee.
First, the bill amends Penal Code Section 1370.01, regarding defendants who are found incompetent to stand trial and allowing them to be referred to a CARE Act court in lieu of automatic diversion from the criminal proceedings.
Second, in perhaps the most substantive change to the CARE Act of the bill, the bill proposes to change the mental health criteria for CARE Act eligibility, making persons with ″bipolar I disorder with psychotic features, except psychosis related to current intoxication″ eligible for the program.
Third, the bill clarifies that a separate hearing is not necessary to determine prima facie evidence of eligibility.
Fourth, the bill clarifies that the court ″may, in its discretion, call additional progress hearings beyond the hearing set at 60 days, for the duration of the CARE agreement.″
Fifth, the bill provides that a court may refer an individual who has been found incompetent to stand trial from both misdemeanor proceedings, or from felony proceedings to the CARE Act court and that the CARE Act court may consider such a referral made by the criminal court to substitute for a petition under the CARE Act if the referral includes all of the information that is required to be provided in a CARE Act petition.
According to the Author
In 2023, CARE Court began as a pilot program in eight counties -- San Francisco, Glenn, Tuolumne, Stanislaus, Orange, Riverside, San Diego, and Los Angeles County. CARE Court is now an active program in all 58 counties as of December 2024. The pilot has revealed that creating a tailored voluntary treatment plan often takes many months to create and implement. Meanwhile, the respondents in CARE Court can suffer from these delays. SB 27 is designed to further refine the CARE Court processes by implementing changes, including but not limited to combing court hearings and expanding CARE eligibility.
Arguments in Support
Families Advocating for the Seriously Mentally Ill (FASMI), which describes itself as a group of family members of the seriously mentally ill and health care providers, writes:
SB 27 provides a reasonable schedule for getting people, including people in the justice system who have been found incompetent to stand trial, into CARE Court if the court finds that appropriate. It clarifies that a person who already has some kind of case management is still eligible for CARE court if they are not clinically stable. It provides for a reasonable exit from CARE Court by letting a judge continue to review the results of a program after 60 days.
. We hope you move SB 27 forward without damaging amendments from patients' rights advocates. These advocates do not speak for our family members who are deteriorating and in danger, the people CARE Court was designed to help.
Arguments in Opposition
A coalition of civil rights groups and disability advocates writes that they are opposed to SB 27 because of its vast expansion of CARE Act eligibility, especially given its inherently coercive elements:
CARE Court threatens an individual′s fundamental rights to privacy, autonomy, and liberty. Under the CARE Court program, individuals can be subject to court-ordered CARE plans or court-overseen CARE agreements. Court-ordered CARE plans bind a respondent to comply with specific behavioral health services that are not the respondent′s choice and to which they may actively object. This directly impinges on their autonomy privacy right to make medical decisions about their own bodies and minds. Even though CARE agreements are purported to be voluntary, there are significant concerns about coercion, because an individual is subject to a CARE plan if a CARE agreement is not agreed to, and the judge may still make changes to the CARE agreement before final approval. SB 27 would expand court oversight of CARE agreements by allowing courts to call for status hearings beyond 60 days, increasing the coerciveness and cost. SB 27 would exacerbate CARE Court′s many problematic features by significantly expanding the program.
FISCAL COMMENTS
According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee:
- Cost pressures to the courts (Trial Court Trust Fund (TCTF), General Fund (GF)) of an unknown but significant amount, possibly in the millions to tens of millions of dollars, to adjudicate petitions for the population made eligible for the CARE program by this bill and handle IST referrals between criminal and CARE courts. The bill streamlines some CARE court processes which may help offset these cost pressures to some extent. It generally costs approximately $1,000 to operate a courtroom for one hour. Although courts are not funded on the basis of workload, increased pressure on the TCTF may create a demand for increased funding for courts from the GF. The fiscal year 2025-26 state budget provides $82 million ongoing GF to the TCTF for court operations.
- Costs to the counties (local funds, GF), likely in the tens of millions of dollars or higher annually, to serve the population made eligible for the CARE program by this bill, handle additional IST referrals, and participate in required court processes. The County Behavioral Health Directors Association (CBHDA), which opposes this bill, anticipates these costs will be between $78 million and $121 million annually ongoing to county health agencies, largely depending on the number of CARE respondents with bipolar I disorder with psychotic features and the number of additional IST referrals to the CARE program. The state must reimburse these county costs from the GF if the Commission on State Mandates determines the duties imposed by this bill constitute a reimbursable state mandate.
- Costs (GF, federal funds (FF)) to Department of Health Care Services (DHCS). DHCS anticipates one-time costs of $4 million in fiscal year (FY) 2026-27 to contract to update its training materials and develop and provide new training and technical assistance for counties, courts, and CARE respondents′ counsel. DHCA also anticipates needing two full-time, permanent positions for data collection, oversight activities, and quality assurance, at a cost of $317,000 ($159,000 GF and $158,000 FF) in FY 2026-27 and $299,000 ($150,000 GF and $149,000 FF) in FY 2027-28 and ongoing. DHCS reports any shortfall in federal funds would have to be made up from the GF.
- Costs (GF) of an unknown but potentially significant amount to California Health and Human Services Agency (CalHHS) to expand its existing activities to cover the population made eligible for the CARE program by this bill.
VOTES
SENATE FLOOR: 39-0-1
YES: Allen, Alvarado-Gil, Archuleta, Arreguín, Ashby, Becker, Blakespear, Cabaldon, Caballero, Cervantes, Choi, Cortese, Dahle, Durazo, Gonzalez, Grayson, Grove, Hurtado, Jones, Laird, Limón, McGuire, McNerney, Menjivar, Niello, Ochoa Bogh, Padilla, Pérez, Richardson, Rubio, Seyarto, Smallwood-Cuevas, Stern, Strickland, Umberg, Valladares, Wahab, Weber Pierson, Wiener
ABS, ABST OR NV: Reyes
ASM JUDICIARY: 11-0-1
YES: Kalra, Dixon, Bauer-Kahan, Connolly, Harabedian, Macedo, Pacheco, Papan, Sanchez, Stefani, Zbur
ABS, ABST OR NV: Bryan
ASM HEALTH: 16-0-0
YES: Bonta, Chen, Addis, Aguiar-Curry, Caloza, Rogers, Flora, Mark González, Elhawary, Patel, Ellis, Celeste Rodriguez, Sanchez, Schiavo, Sharp-Collins, Stefani
ASM PUBLIC SAFETY: 9-0-0
YES: Schultz, Alanis, Mark González, Haney, Harabedian, Lackey, Nguyen, Ramos, Sharp-Collins
ASM APPROPRIATIONS: 11-0-4
YES: Wicks, Arambula, Calderon, Caloza, Elhawary, Fong, Mark González, Ahrens, Pacheco, Pellerin, Solache
ABS, ABST OR NV: Sanchez, Dixon, Ta, Tangipa
UPDATED
VERSION: September 02, 2025
CONSULTANT: Alison Merrilees / JUD. / (916) 319-2334 FN: 0001359
Date of Hearing: August 20, 2025
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Buffy Wicks, Chair
SBPCA Bill Id:SB 27
Author:(Umberg) – As Amended Ver:July 17, 2025
Policy Committee: | Judiciary | Vote: | 11 - 0 |
Health | 16 - 0 | ||
Public Safety | 9 - 0 |
Urgency: Yes State Mandated Local Program: Yes Reimbursable: Yes
SUMMARY:
This bill amends the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act to expand program eligibility and provide for referral of defendants deemed incompetent to stand trial (IST) to CARE court.
Specifically, among other provisions, this bill:
- Expands eligibility under the CARE Act to include a person with a diagnosis in the disorder class of bipolar I disorder with psychotic features, except psychosis related to current intoxication.
- Permits a nurse practitioner or physician’s assistant to submit an affidavit in support of a CARE petition.
- For a misdemeanor defendant deemed IST, authorizes a criminal court to consider referring the defendant for CARE proceedings concurrently with the court’s determination about the defendant’s eligibility and suitability for a diversion program.
- Establishes procedures and timelines for the referral of a criminal defendant deemed IST between a criminal court and a CARE court, including authorizing a CARE court to order a county behavioral health director to complete, within 14 days, an investigation about a potential CARE court respondent.
FISCAL EFFECT:
- Cost pressures to the courts (Trial Court Trust Fund (TCTF), General Fund (GF)) of an unknown but significant amount, possibly in the millions to tens of millions of dollars, to adjudicate petitions for the population made eligible for the CARE program by this bill and handle IST referrals between criminal and CARE courts. The bill streamlines some CARE court processes which may help offset these cost pressures to some extent. It generally costs approximately $1,000 to operate a courtroom for one hour. Although courts are not funded on the basis of workload, increased pressure on the TCTF may create a demand for increased funding for courts from the GF. The fiscal year 2025-26 state budget provides $82 million ongoing GF to the TCTF for court operations.
- Costs to the counties (local funds, GF), likely in the tens of millions of dollars or higher annually, to serve the population made eligible for the CARE program by this bill, handle additional IST referrals, and participate in required court processes. The County Behavioral Health Directors Association (CBHDA), which opposes this bill, anticipates these costs will be between $78 million and $121 million annually ongoing to county health agencies, largely depending on the number of CARE respondents with bipolar I disorder with psychotic features and the number of additional IST referrals to the CARE program. CBHDA also expects significant, unknown county costs in addition to these estimates to implement the bill immediately due to the urgency clause. The state must reimburse these county costs from the GF if the Commission on State Mandates determines the duties imposed by this bill constitute a reimbursable state mandate.
- Costs (GF, federal funds (FF)) to Department of Health Care Services (DHCS). DHCS anticipates one-time costs of $4 million in fiscal year (FY) 2026-27 to contract to update its training materials and develop and provide new training and technical assistance for counties, courts, and CARE respondents’ counsel. DHCA also anticipates needing two full-time, permanent positions for data collection, oversight activities, and quality assurance, at a cost of $317,000 ($159,000 GF and $158,000 FF) in FY 2026-27 and $299,000 ($150,000 GF and $149,000 FF) in FY 2027-28 and ongoing. DHCS reports any shortfall in federal funds would have to be made up from the GF.
- Costs (GF) of an unknown but potentially significant amount to California Health and Human Services Agency (CalHHS) to expand its existing activities to cover the population made eligible for the CARE program by this bill.
COMMENTS:
- Background. In 2022, the Legislature passed and Governor Newsom signed SB 1338 (Umberg), Chapter 319, Statutes of 2022, known as the CARE Act. SB 1338 established the CARE court program, which seeks to provide mental health and substance abuse disorder services to qualifying individuals through court-ordered CARE plans. The goal of the CARE court program is to provide these services without requiring incarceration in jail, detention in a psychiatric facility, or a Lanterman-Petris-Short Act conservatorship. The CARE Act required seven counties to begin implementation by October 1, 2023. The remaining counties were required to begin implementation by December 1, 2024.
The CARE court process begins when a person (“petitioner”) files a petition with the court seeking services for a qualifying person with a serious mental disorder (“respondent”). The court orders a clinical evaluation and appoints a public defender and a support person to represent the respondent in legal proceedings and help the respondent navigate the CARE court process. If the court finds that the respondent meets the statutory criteria, the court orders the parties and the county behavioral health agency to develop a proposed CARE treatment plan for the respondent. Once the court approves the plan, it becomes a court-ordered treatment plan that requires the respondent to participate in specified clinically-appropriate, community-based services for a set period of time. If a respondent fails to complete their CARE treatment plan, a future court may consider that fact when determining whether to place the respondent under a conservatorship.
- CARE Act Funding and Implementation. In fiscal year (FY) 2023-24, the state allocated $38.1 million to the courts and $33.3 million to CalHHS and DHCS for training, data collection, county grants, and other CARE Act activities. These amounts will increase in the coming years, with planned allocations reaching $54.3 million to the courts and $53.3 million to health entities in FY 2026-27 and ongoing. Additionally, the state budget for FY 2025-26 includes $1 million ongoing General Fund for new trial court operations required by SB 42 (Umberg), Chapter 640, Statutes of 2024 – last year’s urgency legislation to amend the CARE court process before its implementation was required statewide.
According to CalHHS’s July 2025 implementation update, 2,008 CARE Act petitions have been filed since October 2023. Just over half of those petitions were filed since the program expanded statewide on December 1, 2024. Additionally, counties reported 1,358 people were diverted from the CARE process to non-CARE county services. CalHHS reports that, during the first nine months of implementation, a high percentage of people who entered into a CARE plan or agreement accessed treatment programs, received mental health care services and medications, and obtained housing supports. However, since most counties have not operated CARE programs for even one year and much of the above data reported by CalHHS is preliminary and unvalidated, it is likely too soon to assess the impact or effectiveness of the CARE program in its current form.
- Support and Opposition. This bill is supported by some California cities and counties, as well as business organizations like the California Chamber of Commerce and California Retailers Association. According to the California Big City Mayors Coalition:
SB 27 strengthens the CARE Court process by speeding up initial proceedings, expanding eligibility, and providing greater clarity—ensuring individuals with serious mental health challenges receive timely and effective care.…CARE Court has been successful in getting some individuals into a CARE program, but further work to ensure proper implementation is necessary.
Other counties, a coalition of disability rights advocates and mental health advocates, and CBHDA oppose this bill. Among other concerns, many of the letters submitted in opposition cite the bill’s expansion of eligibility for CARE Act programs without “the time, resources, expanded workforce, capacity, or housing needed to accomplish this massive expansion.”
Analysis Prepared by: Annika Carlson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081
Date of Hearing: July 15, 2025
Deputy Chief Counsel: Stella Choe
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY
Nick Schultz, Chair
SBPCA Bill Id:SB 27
Author:(Umberg) – As Amended Ver:June 17, 2025
As Proposed to be Amended in Committee
SUMMARY: Makes changes to the recently implemented Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act including program eligibility and how respondents are referred, among other changes. Specifically, this bill:
- Provides that if a defendant is found mentally incompetent to stand trial (IST) in a misdemeanor case, the trial, judgment, or hearing on the alleged violation shall be suspended and the court shall, after notice to the defendant, defense counsel, and the prosecution, hold a hearing to determine whether to do one or more of the following:
- Conduct a hearing to determine if the defendant is “eligible and suitable” for diversion and in that case, grant diversion for a period not to exceed one year from the date the individual is accepted into diversion or the maximum term of imprisonment provided by law for the most serious offense charged in the misdemeanor complaint, whichever is shorter.
- Refer the defendant to the CARE Act court, if the defendant or counsel for the defendant agrees to the referral and the court has reason to believe that the defendant may be eligible for the CARE program.
- Requires the CARE Act court to hold a hearing to determine eligibility for the CARE program within 30 court days after the date of the referral.
- Provides that if the hearing is delayed beyond 30 court days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in a county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing.
- Provides that if the defendant is accepted into the CARE program, the CARE Act court shall notify the criminal court of the acceptance, and the charges shall be dismissed six months after the date of the referral to the CARE program, unless the defendant’s case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that six-month time period.
- Provides that, except as provided in the proceedings related to an investigation of a defendant’s eligibility for CARE services or in proceedings related to Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT), the above provisions do not alter the confidential nature of CARE program proceedings.
- States that if the defendant is not accepted into the CARE program or if the CARE Act court refers the defendant back to criminal court before the expiration of the six-month time period, the court shall proceed with consideration for mental health diversion.
- Provides that if a defendant is found IST in a misdemeanor case but ineligible “or unsuitable” for diversion, the court may refer the defendant to CARE, in which case all of the following would apply:
- The CARE Act court shall hold a hearing to determine eligibility for the CARE program within 14 court days after the date of the referral.
- If the hearing is delayed beyond 14 court days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in a county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing. If the defendant is accepted into the CARE program, the CARE Act court shall notify the criminal court of the acceptance, and the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 six months after the date of the referral to the CARE program, unless the defendant’s case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that time period.
- Except as provided in the proceedings related to an investigation of a defendant’s eligibility for CARE services or in proceedings related to AOT, the above provisions do not alter the confidential nature of CARE program proceedings.
- Allows the county behavioral health agency and jail medical providers to share confidential medical records and other relevant information with the court, including, but not limited to, prior interactions with and treatment of the defendant, for the purpose of determining likelihood of eligibility for behavioral health services and programs pursuant to this section; but clarifies that the disclosure of information is subject to applicable state and federal privacy laws.
- Defines “clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment” (for purposes of the requirement that to qualify for CARE, a person must have a prerequisite mental condition and not be clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treament) to mean all of the following:
- The person’s condition is stable and not deteriorating.
- The person is currently engaged in treatment and managing symptoms through medication or other therapeutic interventions. Enrollment in treatment alone shall not be considered clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment.
- Modifies the criteria to qualify for CARE which is currently limited to schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, to additionally include “bipolar I disorder with psychotic features, except psychosis related to current intoxication.”
- Modifies “affidavit of a licensed behavioral health professional” to include, for purposes of existing law specifying the information required in the petition, nurse practitioners and physician assistants.
- Clarifies that the court may make a prima facie determination without conducting a hearing.
- Allows a CARE court in its discretion, to call additional progress hearings beyond the hearing set at 60 days, for the duration of the CARE agreement.
- Requires that in order to be “graduated” from the CARE program, the court must approve the eligible participant’s request.
- Allows a court to refer an individual from AOT or LPS or in a proceeding finding them to be IST for a misdemeanor, or IST for a felony, to CARE Act court.
- In considering appropriateness of the referral pursuant to 11), provides that the CARE Act court may consider a referral made pursuant to this section to be a petition satisfying the requirements of the CARE Act if both of the following conditions are met:
- The referral contains information sufficient to otherwise satisfy the petition requirements of the CARE Act.
- The information included in the referral makes a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described as qualifying for CARE.
- Requires, if the CARE Act court elects to consider a referral to be a petition pursuant to 11), the CARE Act court to notify the referring court that the referral has been accepted as a petition for CARE Act proceedings.
- Requires, if the CARE Act court does not elect to consider a referral, the CARE Act court to order the appropriate petitioner candidate to do the following within 14 court days:
- Complete an investigation to determine whether to a file a petition on behalf of the referred individual.
- Notify the referring court whether it intends to file a CARE Act petition on behalf of the referred individual.
- Provides that if the appropriate petitioner candidate notifies the CARE Act court that it requires additional time to complete its investigation, the CARE Act court may grant an extension of up to 30 court days.
- Defines, for purposes of 11) -15), “appropriate petitioner candidate” to mean:
- For referrals from assisted outpatient treatment or from misdemeanor IST proceedings: the county behavioral health director or their designee.
- For referrals from conservatorship proceedings: the conservator or proposed conservator.
- Makes the bill an urgency statute that is necessitated by the following findings: “The CARE Act took effect in October 2023, and therefore important changes to the act must take effect immediately to ensure the CARE Act’s success in providing timely assistance to respondents.”
EXISTING LAW:
- Authorizes a court to, after considering the positions of the defense and prosecution, grant pretrial mental health diversion to defendant charged with a misdemeanor or a felony if the defendant meets the following eligibility and suitability requirements:
- The defendant suffers from a mental disorder as identified in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, including, but not limited to, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or post-traumatic stress disorder, but excluding antisocial personality disorder, borderline personality disorder, and pedophilia, and the defense produces evidence of the defendant’s mental disorder which must include a diagnosis by a qualified mental health expert within the last five years;
- The defendant’s mental disorder was a significant factor in the commission of the charged offense, as provided;
- In the opinion of a qualified mental health expert, the defendant’s symptoms of the mental disorder motivating the criminal behavior would respond to mental health treatment;
- The defendant consents to diversion and waives their right to a speedy trial, unless a defendant has been found to be an appropriate candidate for diversion in lieu of commitment due to the their mental incompetence and cannot consent to diversion or give a knowing and intelligent waiver of their right to a speedy trial;
- The defendant agrees to comply with treatment as a condition of diversion; and,
- The defendant will not pose an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety, as defined, if treated in the community. In making this determination, the court may consider the opinions of the district attorney, the defense, or a qualified mental health expert, and may consider the defendant’s treatment plan, violence and criminal history, the current charged offense, and any other factors that the court deems appropriate. (Pen. Code, § 1001.36, subds. (a)-(c).)
- The defendant suffers from a mental disorder as identified in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, including, but not limited to, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or post-traumatic stress disorder, but excluding antisocial personality disorder, borderline personality disorder, and pedophilia, and the defense produces evidence of the defendant’s mental disorder which must include a diagnosis by a qualified mental health expert within the last five years;
- Contains a presumption that the defendant's mental disorder was a significant factor in the commission of the offense, which can be rebutted with clear and convincing evidence. (Pen. Code § 1001.36, subd. (b)(2).)
- Excludes defendants from mental health diversion eligibility if they are charged with murder, voluntary manslaughter, an offense requiring sex-offender registration (except for indecent exposure), or offenses involving weapons of mass destruction. (Pen. Code, § 1001.36, subd. (d).)
- States that at any stage of the proceedings, the court may require the defendant to make a prima facie showing that the defendant will meet the minimum requirements of eligibility for diversion and that the defendant and the offense are suitable for diversion. (Pen. Code, § 1001.36, subd. (e).)
- Provides that the hearing on the prima facie showing shall be informal and may proceed on offers of proof, reliable hearsay, and argument of counsel. If a prima facie showing is not made, the court may summarily deny the request for diversion or grant any other relief as may be deemed appropriate. (Ibid.)
- Defines “pretrial diversion” for purposes of mental health diversion as the postponement of prosecution, either temporarily or permanently, at any point in the judicial process from the point at which the accused is charged until adjudication, to allow the defendant to undergo mental health treatment, subject to the following conditions:
- The court is satisfied that the recommended inpatient or outpatient program of mental health treatment will meet the specialized mental health treatment needs of the defendant;
- The defendant may be referred to a program of mental health treatment utilizing existing inpatient or outpatient mental health resources. Before approving a proposed treatment program, the court shall consider the request of the defense, the request of the prosecution, the needs of the defendant, and the interests of the community. The treatment may be procured using private or public funds, and a referral may be made to a county mental health agency, existing collaborative courts, or assisted outpatient treatment only if that entity has agreed to accept responsibility for the treatment of the defendant, and mental health services are provided only to the extent that resources are available and the defendant is eligible for those services;
- The provider of the mental health treatment program in which the defendant has been placed shall provide regular reports to the court, the defense, and the prosecutor on the defendant’s progress in treatment. (Pen. Code, § 1001.36, subd. (f).)
- Establishes the CARE Act, which must be implemented by Glenn, Orange, Riverside, San Diego, San Francisco, Stanislaus, and Tuolumne Counties by October 1, 2023, and the remaining counties by December 1, 2024, subject to delays based on a state or local emergency, or discretionary approval by the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), up until December 1, 2025. Provides that the CARE Act only becomes operative upon DHCS, in consultation with county stakeholders, developing a CARE Act allocation to provide state financial assistance to counties to implement the CARE process. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5970 et seq.)
- Defines, for purposes of the CARE Act, certain terms, including:
- "CARE agreement" is a voluntary settlement agreement, which includes the same elements as a CARE plan.
- "CARE plan" is an individualized, appropriate range of services and supports consisting of behavioral health care, stabilization medications, housing, and other supportive services, as provided.
- "Graduation plan" is a voluntary agreement entered into by the parties at the end of the CARE program that includes a strategy to support a successful transition out of court jurisdiction and may include a psychiatric advance directive. A graduation plan includes the same elements as a CARE plan to support the respondent in accessing services and supports. A graduation plan may not place additional requirements on the local government entities and is not enforceable by the court.
- “Licensed behavioral health professional” means either of the following:
- A licensed mental health professional, as defined in subdivision (j) of Section 4096.
- A person who has been granted a waiver of licensure requirements by the department pursuant to Section 5751.2.
- "Parties" are the person who file the petition, the respondent and the county behavioral health agency, along with other parties that the court may add if they are providing services to the respondent.
- "Petitioner" is the entity who files the CARE Act petition, but if other than the county behavioral health agency, the court is required, at the initial hearing, to substitute the director of county behavioral health agency or their designee as the petitioner, limiting the initial petitioner's rights to potentially receiving ongoing notice of the proceedings, and the right to make a statement at the hearing on the merits of the petition, with broader participation rights only if the respondent consents.
- "Respondent" is the person who is subject to the petition for the CARE process.
- "Supporter" is an adult who assists the respondent, which may include supporting the person to understand, make, communicate, implement, or act on their own life decisions during the CARE process, including a CARE agreement, a CARE plan, and developing a graduation plan. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5971.)
- Provides that a respondent may qualify for the CARE process only if all of the following criteria are met:
- The person is 18 years of age or older.
- The person is currently experiencing a severe mental illness, as defined, and has a diagnosis identified in the disorder class: schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, as defined in the most current version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Specifically exempts specified other conditions or disorders.
- The person is not clinically stabilized in on-going voluntary treatment.
- At least one of the following is true:
- The person is unlikely to survive safely in the community without supervision and the person's condition is substantially deteriorating.
- The person is in need of services and supports in order to prevent a relapse or deterioration that would be likely to result in grave disability or serious harm to the person or to others.
- Participation in a CARE plan or agreement would be the least restrictive alternative necessary to ensure the person's recovery and stability.
- It is likely that the person will benefit from participation in a CARE plan or agreement. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5972.)
- Allows a petition to initiate a CARE proceeding to be brought by one of the following adults:
- A person with whom the respondent resides or a spouse, parent, sibling, child, or grandparent of the respondent, or another individual who stands in loco parentis to the respondent.
- The director of a hospital, or their designee, in which the respondent is hospitalized, or the director of a public or charitable organization, agency, or home, or their designee, that is currently, or within the previous 30 days, providing behavioral health services to the respondent or in whose institution the respondent resides.
- A licensed behavioral health professional, or their designee, who is treating, or has been treating within the last 30 days, the respondent for a mental illness.
- A first responder, including a peace officer, firefighter, paramedic, emergency medical technician, mobile crisis response worker, or homeless outreach worker who has had repeated interactions with the respondent in the form of multiple arrests, multiple detentions, as provided, multiple attempts to engage the respondent in voluntary treatment or other repeated efforts to aid the respondent in obtaining professional assistance.
- The public guardian or public conservator, or their designee (and a respondent may be referred from conservatorship proceedings).
- The director of a county behavioral health agency of the county in which the respondent resides or is present (and a respondent may be referred from assisted outpatient treatment proceedings).
- The director of the county Adult Protective Services or their designee.
- The director of a California Indian health services program, California tribal behavioral health department, or their designee.
- The judge of a tribal court that is located in California, or their designee.
- The respondent. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5974.)
- Requires the Judicial Council to develop a mandatory form for use to file a CARE process petition with the court and any other forms necessary for the CARE process; and request the petition to be signed under the penalty of perjury and contain specified information, including one of the following:
- An affidavit of a licensed behavioral health professional, stating that the licensed behavioral health professional or their designee has examined the respondent within 60 days of the submission of the petition, or has made multiple attempts to examine, but has not been successful in eliciting the cooperation of the respondent to submit to an examination, within 60 days of the petition, and that the licensed behavioral health professional had determined that the respondent meets, or has reason to believe, explained with specificity in the affidavit, that the respondent meets the diagnostic criteria for CARE proceedings.
- Evidence that the respondent was detained for a minimum of two intensive treatments pursuant to Article 4 (commencing with Section 5250) of Chapter 2 of Part 1, the most recent one within the previous 60 days. Evidence may include, but is not limited to, documentary evidence from the facility where the respondent was detained, or a signed declaration from the petitioner if the petitioner had personal knowledge of the detentions. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5975.)
- Allows a court, if a criminal defendant is found to be IST and ineligible for a diversion, to refer the defendant to the CARE program, as provided. (Pen. Code, § 1370.1, subd. (b)(1)(D)(iv).)
- Sets out the respondent's rights, including the right to be represented by counsel at all stages of a CARE proceeding, and requires the court to appoint specified counsel if the respondent does not have their own attorney. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5976.)
- Provides that all CARE Act hearings are presumptively closed to the public. Allows the respondent to demand that the hearings be public or request the presence of a family member or friend without waiving their right to keep the hearing closed to the general public. A request by another party to make a hearing public may be granted if the court finds that the public interest clearly outweighs the respondent's privacy interest. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5976.5.)
- Requires, for all CARE Act proceedings, that the judge control all hearings with a view to the expeditious and effective ascertainment of the jurisdictional facts and the ascertainment of all information relative to the present condition and future welfare of the respondent. Except where there is a contested issue of fact or law, requires the proceedings to be conducted in an informal, non-adversarial atmosphere with a view to obtaining the maximum cooperation of the respondent, all persons interested in the respondent's welfare, and all other parties, with any provisions that the court may make for the disposition and care of the respondent. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.4, subd. (a).)
- Upon receipt of a CARE Act petition, requires the court to promptly review the petition to see if it makes a prima facie showing that the respondent is or may be a person eligible for services under the CARE Act. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977, subd. (a)(1).)
- If the court finds the petitioner has not made a prima facie showing that the respondent is or may be a person who is eligible for services under the CARE Act, the court shall dismiss without prejudice, except if the court finds that the petition is without merit, or intended to harass the respondent. Allows a petition to be refiled with new information. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977, subd. (a)(2).)
- If the court finds the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that the respondent is or may be a person who is eligible for services under the CARE Act, and the petitioner is the county behavioral health agency, the court shall do all of the following: (i) set the matter for an initial appearance; (ii) appoint counsel; (iii) determine if the petition includes all the required information and, if not, order the county to submit a report with the information; and (iv) require notice be provided. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977, subd. (a)(3)(A).)
- If the court finds the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that the respondent is or may be a person who is eligible for services under the CARE Act, and the petitioner is not the county behavioral health agency, the court shall order the county agency to investigate whether the respondent meets the eligibility criteria of the CARE Act and is willing to engage voluntarily with the county, file a written report with the court, and provide notice, as required by the Act. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977, subd. (a)(3)(B).)
- Provides that if the county agency is making progress to engage the respondent, the agency may request up to an additional 30 days to continue to engage and enroll the individual in treatment and services. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977, subd. (a)(4).)
- Requires, within five days of the receipt of the investigative report described above, the court to review the report and do one of the following:
- If the court determines that voluntary engagement with the respondent is effective, as provided, requires the court to dismiss the matter.
- If the court determines that the county's report supports the petition's prima facie showing that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, and engagement is not effective, requires the court to: (i) set an initial hearing within 14 days; (ii) appoint counsel, unless the respondent has their own counsel; and (iii) provide notice of the hearing, as provided.
- If the court determines that the county's report does not support the petition's prima facie showing that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, requires the court to dismiss the matter. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977, subd. (a)(5).)
- Provides at the initial hearing:
- If the petitioner is not present, allows the court to dismiss the matter.
- If the respondent elects not to waive their appearance and is not present, allows the court to conduct the hearing in the respondent's absence if the court makes a finding on the record that reasonable attempts to elicit the attendance of the respondent have failed, and conducting the hearing without the participation or presence of the respondent would be in the respondent's best interest.
- Requires a county behavioral health agency representative to be present, allows a supporter to be appointed, and allows a tribal representative to attend for a respondent who is a tribal member, as provided, and subject to the respondent's consent.
- If the court finds that there is no reason to believe that the facts stated in the petition are true, requires the court to dismiss the case without prejudice, unless the court makes a finding on the record that the petitioner's filing was not in good faith.
- If the court finds that there is reason to believe that the facts stated in the petition appear to be true, requires the court to order the county behavioral health agency to work with the respondent and the respondent's counsel and CARE supporter to engage in behavioral health treatment. Requires the court to set a case management hearing within 14 days.
- If the petitioner is other than the county behavioral health director, substitutes the county behavioral health director or their designee for the petitioner, as specified.
- Requires the court to set a hearing on the merits of the petition, which may be conducted concurrently with the initial appearance on the petition upon stipulation of the petitioner and respondent and agreement by the court. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977, subd. (b).)
- Provides at the hearing on the merits:
- If the court finds that the petitioner has not shown, by clear and convincing evidence, that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, requires the court to dismiss the case without prejudice, unless the court makes a finding, on the record, that the petitioner's filing was not in good faith.
- If the court finds that the petitioner has shown by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, requires the court to order the county behavioral health agency to work with the respondent, the respondent's counsel, and the supporter to engage in behavioral health treatment and determine if the parties will be able to enter into a CARE agreement. Requires the court to set a case management hearing. Requires notice to the tribe, if applicable. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977, subd. (c).)
- Provides at the case management hearing:
- If the parties have entered, or are likely to enter, a CARE agreement, requires the court to approve or modify and approve the CARE agreement, stay the matter, and set a progress hearing for 60 days.
- If the court finds that the parties have not entered, and are not likely to enter, into a CARE agreement, requires the court to order a clinical evaluation of the respondent, as provided. Requires the evaluation to address, at a minimum, a clinical diagnosis, whether the respondent has capacity to give informed consent regarding psychotropic medication, other information, as provided, and an analysis of recommended services, programs, housing, medications, and interventions that support the respondent's recovery and stability.
- Requires the court to set a clinical evaluation hearing. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.1.)
- Provides at the clinical evaluation review hearing:
- The court shall consider the evaluation, and other evidence, including calling witnesses, but only relevant and admissible evidence that fully complies with the rules of evidence may be considered by the court.
- If the court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, after review of the evaluation and other evidence, that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, requires the court to order the county behavioral health agency, the respondent, and the respondent's counsel and supporter to jointly develop a CARE plan.
- If the court finds, in reviewing the evaluation, that clear and convincing evidence does not support that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, requires the court to dismiss the petition. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.1, subd. (c).)
- Provides at the hearing to review the proposed CARE plan:
- The parties shall present their plan or plans to the court. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.1, subd. (d)(1).)
- The court shall adopt the elements of a CARE plan that support the recovery and stability of the respondent. Allows the court to issue any orders necessary to support the respondent in accessing appropriate services and supports, including prioritization for those services and supports, subject to applicable laws and available funding, as provided. These orders are the CARE plan. (Id. at (d)(2).)
- A court may order medication if it finds, upon review of the court-ordered evaluation and hearing from the parties that, by clear and convincing evidence, the respondent lacks the capacity to give informed consent to the administration of medically necessary stabilization medication. To the extent that the court orders medically necessary stabilization medications, prohibits the medication from being forcibly administered and the respondent's failure to comply with a medication order may not result in a penalty, including but not limited to a court order of contempt or imposition of accountability measures. (Id. at (d)(3).)
- Specifies that the above provisions do not prohibit the parties from agreeing to, and the court from approving, amendments to the CARE plan. The court may also approve amendments to the CARE plan upon the finding that those amendments are necessary to support the respondent in accessing appropriate services and supports, following a hearing on the issue. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.1, subd. (d)(7).)
- Requires that a status review hearing occur at least every 60 days during the CARE plan implementation. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.2, subd. (a)(1).)
- Requires the petitioner to file with the court, and serve on the respondent and the respondent's counsel and supporter, a report not less than five court days prior to the hearing, with specified information, including progress the respondent has made on the CARE plan, what services and supports in the CARE plan were provided, and what services and supports were not provided, and any recommendations for changes to the services and supports to make the CARE plan more successful.
- Allows the respondent to respond to the report and introduce their own information and recommendations.
- Allows the petitioner, the respondent, or the court to request more frequent reviews as necessary to address changed circumstances. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.2, subd. (a)(1)(A) – (b).)
- Requires the court, in the 11th month, to hold a one-year status hearing, which is an evidentiary hearing, to determine if the respondent graduates from the CARE plan or should be reappointed for another year.
- Requires a report by the petitioner before the status conference, as provided. Allows the respondent to call witnesses and present evidence.
- Provides that the respondent may be graduated from the CARE program and may be allowed to enter into a voluntary graduation plan with the county. However, such plan may not place additional requirements on the county and is not enforceable, other than a psychiatric advance directive if included.
- If the respondent elects to accept voluntary reappointment to the program, the respondent may request to be re-appointed to the CARE program for up to one additional year, subject to meeting certain criteria and court approval.
- Allows the court to involuntarily reappoint the respondent to the CARE program for up to one year if the court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that (i) the respondent did not successfully complete the CARE process; (ii) all of the required services and supports were provided to the respondent; (ii) the respondent would benefit from continuation of the CARE process; and (iv) the respondent currently meets the requirements for initial enrollment in the CARE program.
- Provides that a respondent may only be reappointed to the CARE program for up to one additional year. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.3.)
- Provides mandatory timeframes, as well as continuances for good cause, throughout the CARE court proceedings. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5977.1.)
- Allows the court, at any point in the proceedings, if it determines, by clear and convincing evidence, that the respondent, after receiving notice, is not participating in the CARE proceedings, to terminate respondent's participation in the CARE process. Allows the court to make a referral under the LPS Act, as provided. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5979, subd. (a).)
- Provides that all CARE plan services and supports ordered by the court are subject to available funding and all applicable federal and state statutes, regulations, contractual provisions and policy guidance governing program eligibility, as provided. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5982, subd. (d).)
- Sets forth rules by which a county is responsible for the costs of providing services to CARE participants. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5982, subds. (d) – (f).)
- Requires the Health and Human Services Agency, as provided, to (1) engage an independent, research-based entity to advise on the development of data-driven process and outcome measures to guide the planning, collaboration, reporting, and evaluation of the CARE Act; and (2) convene a working group to provide coordination and on-going engagement with, and support collaboration among, relevant state and local partners and other stakeholders throughout the phases of county implementation to support the successful implementation of the CARE Act, including during implementation. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5983, subd. (a).)
- Provides immunity to a county, or an employee or agent of a county, for any action by a respondent in the CARE process, except when the act or omission of a county, or the employee or agent of a county, constitutes gross negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5987.)
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown.
COMMENTS:
- Author's Statement: According to the author, "This is a cleanup bill that makes several important reforms to the Community Assistance, Recovery and Empowerment (CARE) Act. Firstly, this bill requires courts to consider CARE referral as an option for the Misdemeanor Incompetent to Stand Trial (MIST) defendants. Secondly, the bill combines specified hearings and sharing of data between CARE partners and allowing additional licensed medical professionals to participate. This bill would also revise CARE Act eligibility criteria and definitions. Additionally, this proposal would clarify that courts have ongoing oversight and flexibility of CARE plans. Finally, this bill expands CARE eligibility to mood disorders with psychotic features, in addition to those with schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders.”
- CARE Act: In 2022, the Governor signed SB 1338 (Umberg) Chapter 319, known as the CARE Act. The CARE Act established a new civil court process to provide clinically appropriate, community-based services and supports that are culturally and linguistically competent, to Californians with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and other psychotic disorders, while also preserving these individuals’ self-determination to the greatest extent possible. To be eligible under the CARE Act, a person must meet all of the following:
- 18 years of age or older;
- Have a serious mental illness and a diagnosis of a schizophrenia spectrum or other psychotic disorder;
- They are not clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment;
- They are unlikely to survive safely in the community without supervision and the person’s condition is substantially deteriorating or they are in need of services and supports in order to prevent a relapse or deterioration that would be likely to result in grave disability or serious harm to the person or others, as used in the LPS Act in 1) of Existing Law;
- CARE would be the least restrictive alternative necessary to ensure the person’s recovery and stability; and,
- It is likely that the person will benefit from participation in CARE.
The first seven pilot counties implemented the CARE Act in October 2023, Los Angeles implemented in December 2023, and all counties were required to begin accepting CARE petitions as of December 1, 2024, unless they received an implementation extension from DHCS.
Under the CARE Act, a county behavioral health agency, spouse, parent, sibling, child, or grandparent of the respondent, a treating behavioral health professional, the county public guardian or public conservator, and others, as specified, may petition to begin the CARE process. If the original petitioner is not the county behavioral health agency, the county behavioral health agency replaces the original petitioner as the CARE petition proceeds. There are two paths to court-ordered services: if the respondent and the behavioral health agency are able to agree on a plan, it is known as a “CARE Agreement” and if they are unable to reach an agreement, one or both parties may present a proposed “CARE Plan” to the court and the court may accept a proposed plan or adopt a modified plan, which becomes a court order that lasts for up to one year. The CARE Plan or Agreement may provide for behavioral health services and housing supports, as well as other services, and counties may face financial penalties for failure to provide the required services. The court may allow the original petitioner to participate in the respondent’s CARE proceedings, to the extent that the respondent consents.
This bill makes several changes to the CARE Act. The bill amends Penal Code Section 1370.01, regarding misdemeanor defendants who are found IST and allowing them to be referred to a CARE Act court in lieu of mental health diversion from the criminal proceedings. This will be discussed in further detail in Note 3 below.
The bill would also expand eligibility for CARE which is currently limited to schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, to additionally include bipolar I disorder with psychotic features, except psychosis related to current intoxication.
The bill would clarify that no hearing is necessary to determine prima facie evidence of eligibility.
Additionally, the bill clarifies that the court may, in its discretion, call additional progress hearings beyond the hearing set at 60 days, for the duration of the CARE agreement and amends existing procedures for graduation from CARE proceedings to require court approval of the respondent’s request to graduate from the program.
The bill also clarifies that a court may refer an individual who has been found IST from both misdemeanor proceedings or from felony proceedings to the CARE Act court and that in either case, the CARE Act court may consider a referral made pursuant to this section to be a petition under the CARE Act if both of the specified conditions are met. Existing law provides the authority of a criminal court to refer a felony IST or misdemeanor IST defendant to CARE court but this authority is not specified in the CARE Act, thus this bill would clarify that the court has the authority to do this.
Lastly, grants the CARE Court the authority, if information in the referral does not provide all of the information necessary for a petition, to direct that an investigation be conducted.
- Background on Mental Health Diversion: Diversion is the suspension of criminal proceedings for a prescribed time period with certain conditions. A defendant may not be required to admit guilt as a prerequisite for placement in a pretrial diversion program. If diversion is successfully completed, the criminal charges are dismissed and the defendant may, with certain exceptions, legally answer that he or she has never been arrested or charged for the diverted offense. If diversion is not successfully completed, the criminal proceedings resume, however, a hearing to terminate diversion is required.
In 2018, the Legislature enacted a law authorizing pretrial diversion of eligible defendants with mental disorders. Under the mental health diversion law, in order to be eligible for diversion, 1) the defendant must suffer from a mental disorder, except those specifically excluded, 2) that played a significant factor in the commission of the charged offense; 3) in the opinion of a qualified mental health expert, the defendant’s symptoms of the mental disorder causing, contributing to, or motivating the criminal behavior would respond to mental health treatment; 4) the defendant must consent to diversion and waive the right to a speedy trial; 5) the defendant must agree to comply with treatment as a condition of diversion; and 6) the court is satisfied that the defendant will not pose an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety, as defined, if treated in the community. (Pen. Code, § 1001.36, subds. (b)-(c).) The law also states that a defendant is not eligible if they are charged with specified crimes, including murder, voluntary manslaughter, specified sex crimes and any crime requiring sex offender registration. (Pen. Code, § 1001.36, subd. (d).)
In 2022, the Legislature amended the mental health diversion law to, among other things restate that granting diversion is in the trial court’s discretion in subdivision (a) (the original law provided the court’s discretion in subdivision (h)) and to require the court to find that the defendant’s mental disorder was a significant factor in the commission of the offense unless there is clear and convincing evidence that it was not.[1] The cited reason for this change was a recommendation from the Committee on the Revision of the Penal Code.[2] One of the Committee’s recommendations, after staff’s exhaustive research and receiving public testimony from expert witnesses including crime victims, law enforcement leaders, judges, and criminal defense experts and advocates, was to strengthen the mental health diversion law by increasing its use in appropriate cases, with include consideration of risk to public safety. Specifically, the Committee recommended that the law be changed to simplify the procedural process for obtaining diversion by presuming that a defendant’s diagnosed “mental disorder” has a connection to their offense. A judge could deny diversion if that presumption was rebutted or for other reasons currently permitted under the law, including finding that the individual would pose an unreasonable risk to public safety if placed in a diversion program.[3]
In addition to the eligibility requirements of the defendant, mental health treatment program must meet the following requirements: 1) the court is satisfied that the recommended inpatient or outpatient program of mental health treatment will meet the specialized mental health treatment needs of the defendant; 2) the defendant may be referred to a program of mental health treatment utilizing existing inpatient or outpatient mental health resources; 3) and the program must submit regular reports to the court and counsel regarding the defendant’s progress in treatment. (Pen. Code, § 1001.36, subd. (f).) The court has the discretion to select the specific program of diversion for the defendant. The county is not required to create a mental health program for the purposes of diversion, and even if a county has existing mental health programs suitable for diversion, the particular program selected by the court must agree to receive the defendant for treatment. (Pen. Code, § 1001.36, subd. (f)(1)(A).)
The diversion program cannot last more than two years for a felony and cannot last for more than a year on a misdemeanor. (Pen. Code, § 1001.36, subd. (f)(1)(C).) If there is a request for victim restitution, the court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether restitution is owed to any victim as a result of the diverted offense and, if owed, order its payment during the period of restitution. (Pen. Code, § 1001.36, subd. (f)(1)(D).)
The stated purpose of the diversion program is “to promote all of the following: . . . Allowing local discretion and flexibility for counties in the development and implementation of diversion for individuals with mental disorders across a continuum of care settings.” (Pen. Code, § 1001.35, subd. (b).)
Mental health diversion can be granted to persons charged with either a misdemeanor or felony. Within this group, persons who are found IST can also be granted diversion. This bill specifically deals with the population of defendants who would be considered for mental health diversion who is charged with a misdemeanor after a finding that the person is IST which will be discussed in more detail in note 4 below.
- Mental Competency in Criminal Proceedings: The Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution prohibits the criminal prosecution of a defendant who is not mentally competent to stand trial. Existing law provides that if a person has been charged with a crime and is not able to understand the nature of the criminal proceedings and/or is not able to assist counsel in his or her defense, the court may determine that the offender is IST. (Pen. Code § 1367.) When the court issues an order for a hearing into the present mental competence of the defendant, all proceedings in the criminal prosecution are suspended until the question of present mental competence has been determined. (Pen. Code, §1368, subd. (c).)
In order to determine mental competence, the court must appoint a psychiatrist or licensed psychologist to examine the defendant. If defense counsel opposes a finding on incompetence, the court must appoint two experts: one chosen by the defense, one by the prosecution. (Pen. Code, § 11369, subd. (a).) The examining expert(s) must evaluate the defendant’s alleged mental disorder and the defendant’s ability to understand the proceedings and assist counsel, as well as address whether antipsychotic medication is medically appropriate. (Pen. Code, § 1369, subd. (a).)
Both parties have a right to a jury trial to decide competency. (Pen. Code, § 1369.) A formal trial is not required when jury trial has been waived. (People v. Harris (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 984.) The burden of proof is on the party seeking a finding of incompetence. (People v. Skeirik (1991) 229 Cal.App.3d 444, 459-460.) Because a defendant is initially considered competent to stand trial (Medina v. California (1992) 505 U.S. 437), usually this means that the defense bears the burden of proof to establish incompetence. Therefore, defense counsel must first present evidence to support mental incompetence. However, if defense counsel does not want to offer evidence to have the defendant declared incompetent, the prosecution may. Each party may offer rebuttal evidence. Final arguments are presented to the court or jury, with the prosecution going first, followed by defense counsel. (Pen. Code, § 1369, subds. (b)-(e).)
For defendants charged with a felony, if after an examination and hearing the defendant is found IST, the criminal proceedings are suspended and the court shall order the defendant to be referred to DSH, or to any other available public or private treatment facility, including a community-based residential treatment system if the facility has a secured perimeter or a locked and controlled treatment facility, approved by the community program director that will promote the defendant’s speedy restoration to mental competence, or placed on outpatient status, except as specified. (Pen. Code § 1368, subd. (c) and 1370, subd. (a)(1)(B).) The court may also make a determination as to whether the defendant is an appropriate candidate for mental health diversion pursuant to Penal Code section 1001.36.
The maximum term of commitment for an IST defendant charged with a felony is two-years, however, no later than 90 days prior to the expiration of the defendant’s term of commitment, if the defendant has not regained mental competence shall be returned to the committing court and the court shall not order the defendant returned to the custody of DSH. (Pen. Code, § 1370, subd. (c)(1).) With the exception of proceedings alleging a violation of mandatory supervision, the criminal action may be dismissed in the interests of justice. (Pen. Code, § 1370, subd. (d).)
For defendants charged with a misdemeanor, if the defendant is found IST, the proceedings shall be suspended and the court may do either of the following: 1) conduct a hearing to determine whether the defendant is eligible for mental health diversion; or 2) dismiss the charges pursuant to Penal Code section 1385. If the charges are dismissed, the court shall transmit a copy of the order to county behavioral health director or the director’s designee. (Pen. Code, § 1370.01, subd. (b).)
If a misdemeanor defendant is found eligible for diversion, the court may grant diversion for a period not to exceed one year from the date the individual is accepted into diversion or the maximum term of imprisonment provided by law for the most serious offense charged in the complaint, whichever is shorter. (Pen. Code, § 1370.01, subd. (b)(1)(A).)
If the court finds that the defendant is not eligible for diversion, the court may, after notice to the defendant, defense counsel, and the prosecution, hold a hearing to determine whether to do any of the following: 1) order modification of the treatment plan in accordance with a recommendation from the treatment provider; 2) refer the defendant to assisted outpatient treatment (AOT); if the defendant is accepted into AOT, the charges shall be dismissed; 3) refer the defendant to the county conservatorship investigator for possible conservatorship if the defendant appears to be gravely disabled, as defined; if a conservatorship is established, the charges shall be dismissed; or 4) refer the defendant to the CARE program; if the defendant is accepted into CARE the charges shall be dismissed. (Pen. Code, § 1370.01, subd. (b)(1)(D).)
This bill authorizes the criminal court to consider referral of the defendant to a CARE Act court at an earlier stage in the process instead of waiting to determine whether the person is unsuitable for diversion. This bill specifies that the person can be referred to CARE court in lieu of mental health diversion if the defendant or counsel for the defendant agrees to the referral and the court has reason to believe that the defendant may be eligible for the program. Additionally, this bill provides that if the person is not accepted into the CARE program or if the CARE Act court refers the defendant back to criminal court before the expiration of the six-month time period, the court shall proceed as it normally would have with considering the defendant for diversion.
Supporters of this bill state that a subset of misdemeanor IST defendant who are likely to be eligible for CARE and are also likely to be found not suitable for mental health diversion would benefit from an earlier referral to CARE instead of considering mental health diversion first, and then moving into other options including CARE. They argue that oftentimes the defendant is waiting up to 30 days for a hearing on whether they will be granted diversion and then released on their own recognizance. Locating these individuals can be difficult for the behavioral health agency if they have been released.
However, opponents of this bill, which include the Behavioral Health Directors, argue that this does not give them enough time to work up the petition or collaborate with the court and defense counsel and prosecutors to determine whether a person would be a good candidate for CARE court which could also lead to delays once a person is referred. This bill states that the referral is contingent on both the defense agreeing to the referral as well as the court having reason to believe the person is eligible. It is unclear if the court would have enough information at this early of a stage to believe that a person may be eligible for CARE court, however requiring the referral to be voluntary perhaps helps to narrow this category of people to those who ultimately want to receive CARE services. Additionally, they are concerned that the urgency clause in this bill would not give county agencies enough time to prepare for the changes made by this bill.
- CARE Act Annual Report: AB 102 (Ting) Chapter 102, Statutes of 2023, required DHCS to issue an early implementation report on the CARE Act. In the first nine months of implementation (October 2023 through June 2024), 557 total petitions were filed and 217 of those were dismissed at the discretion of a judge. Preliminary data from July through September 2024 indicates an additional 231 petitions were filed. The report further indicates that dismissals will require further research, since the reasons for their dismissal are not available for the preliminary report, and could include people who are receiving care, those whose cases were dismissed for successful voluntarily engagement, people not being eligible for CARE who receive needed treatment another way, or people who are still not receiving care. The report also states that the CARE process can take time, like all mental health and SUD care, to build the trust and develop the self-directed plans needed for long-term recovery and stability.
The first CARE Act annual report was released in June 2025 and covered the same reporting period as the early implementation report. The annual report clarified that 556 petitions were filed and 101 (18%) resulted in CARE agreements or court-ordered CARE plans. Thirty-nine percent of petitions were dismissed and 229 were still pending at the end of the reporting period (over one year ago). Fifty-five respondents were found ineligible for CARE but received services from a county behavioral health agency, while an additional 90 found ineligible did not receive any county behavioral health services. Most respondents were male (64%) and aged 26–45 (64%), and 37% of respondents were White, 21% Hispanic, 18% Black, and 7% Asian, with 11.6% unknown. The most common petitioner type is personal contacts (such as family and household members) who filed 68% of petitions. County behavioral health agencies and public guardians are unlikely to refer because they may prefer to engage in services without court involvement, as some indicated in the early implementation report.
CARE respondents largely access mental health treatment (93%) and three-quarters of respondents accessed specialized mental health programs like Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) or Full-Service Partnership (FSP). Many respondents received stabilizing medications (72%) with 40% of those individuals receiving long-acting injectable medications. Long-acting injectable antipsychotic medications can be given as a shot in the muscle or under the skin and they usually are given every 2 to 4 weeks, according to the Mayo Clinic. Sixty-three percent received all three foundational services (medication, treatment, and housing supports) though unmet needs remain.
The report notes that housing remains a challenge, though the share of respondents in permanent housing increased from 46% at time of petition to 56% in the most current reporting period. The most common unmet need for CARE participants was securing and maintaining permanent housing. Over half of CARE participants did not receive at least one ordered mental health service during their active service period (the most common was peer supports). Twenty-five percent had criminal justice involvement during their service period, 21% had emergency visits, and 20% were hospitalized or placed on psychiatric holds. The report notes that only 15 individuals became "elective clients," those who voluntarily engaged with services outside court oversight. These clients generally accessed fewer services, especially medications and housing supports, suggesting disparities in care quality.
Along with the first annual report, the California Health and Human Services Agency (HHSA) released a companion document to provide an update on implementation. As of May 31, 2025, 2,008 petitions have been filed across California since October 2023. Since the CARE Act took effect in all counties in December 2024, 1,063 petitions were filed, which is more total petitions than had been filed in the previous 14 months. The update also states that, through 2024, counties “diverted” 1,358 individuals to other services through CARE outreach.
- Triple-Referral: The contents of this bill propose changes that are in the jurisdiction of the Judiciary Committee, Health Committee and Public Safety Committee. Assembly Judiciary Committee heard the bill on July 1, 2025 and Assembly Health Committee head the bill on July 8, 2025. Issues within the jurisdiction of Judiciary and Health Committees have been analyzed by those Committees.
- Argument in Support: According to Big City Mayors, “Our cities remain deeply committed to connecting vulnerable individuals with the behavioral health services they need. SB 27 strengthens the CARE Court process by speeding up initial proceedings, expanding eligibility, and providing greater clarity—ensuring individuals with serious mental health challenges receive timely and effective care. We appreciate Senator Umberg’s leadership in advancing these critical improvements.
“Through the passage of SB 1338 (Umberg, 2022), the State of California took an important step in connecting individuals struggling with serious, untreated mental illness with court-ordered treatment plans through the CARE Court Program. CARE Court has been successful in getting some individuals into a CARE program, but further work to ensure proper implementation is necessary.
“Under current law, when a defendant is found mentally incompetent to stand trial for a misdemeanor (MIST), the court may hold a hearing to determine their eligibility for diversion. Only if the individual is ineligible for diversion may they be referred to CARE Court—despite being part of a population that could benefit significantly from CARE services.”
- Argument in Opposition: According to Mental Health America of California, “CARE Court is a legal mechanism to force individuals into court-ordered, and thus involuntary, behavioral healthcare. Approximately 4.4% of U.S. adults experience bipolar disorder in their lifetime.1 Currently, CARE Court eligibility is limited to individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders with a prevalence in the U.S. ranging between 0.25% and 0.64%.2 Expanding eligibility to include Bipolar 1 Disorder with psychotic features would increase the number of individuals being stripped of their right to choose the mental health supports and services that best meet their needs. An individual's mental health challenges are not better addressed when the government tells them what to do.
“Senate Bill 27 also makes sweeping changes to California’s mental health diversion process. Under current law, when a person is found incompetent to stand trial, the court is required to hold a diversion hearing. If, at this hearing, a person is deemed ineligible for diversion, another hearing is conducted to determine alternatives to diversion including Assisted Outpatient Treatment, CARE Court, or conservatorship. This bill instead mandates a new initial hearing to determine if: a) the court wants to hold an additional diversion hearing; or b) the court wants to refer an individual directly to CARE Court. At this point, no other alternatives are offered, and the court would be able to bypass the entire diversion process by sending an individual directly to CARE Court. If the court chooses option (a) under SB 27, the diversion process would proceed in a similar manner to current law, with the option to refer individuals to a range of alternative programs if they are deemed ineligible for diversion.
“CARE Court is a new, unproven mental health program. In its Early Implementation Report released in November 2024, the Department of Health Care Services reported only a total of 100 Care Court participants, yet state officials estimated 7,000 to 12,000 people would be eligible.34 With only 100 people enrolled in CARE Court, it costs an estimated $713,000 per person a year. These costs are for court personnel and other court costs, and do not include any costs for treatment. For comparison, Full-Service Partnerships (FSP) are designed to provide treatment for, and services to, adults with serious mental illness. This costs taxpayers approximately $16,666 per person and, as of 2021, services more than 60,000 people statewide.”
- Related Legislation:
- SB 331 (Menjivar) would permit an original petitioner to be assigned ongoing rights by the court throughout the CARE process. SB 331 is pending hearing in the Assembly Health Committee.
- SB 823 (Stern) would include bipolar I disorder in the criteria for a person to receive services under the CARE Act. SB 823 was held in the Senate Appropriations Committee’s suspense file.
- Prior Legislation:
- SB 42 (Umberg), Chapter 640, Statutes of 2024 made various changes to the CARE Act, with an urgency clause so that the bill took effect in advance of the second cohort of counties’ implementation of the CARE Act on or before December 1, 2024.
- SB 1400 (Stern), Chapter 647, Statutes of 2024, relevant to this bill, modified CARE Act reporting requirements including requiring trial courts to report to Judicial Council on the number of CARE plans ordered, CARE agreements approved, and CARE petitions dismissed.
- SB 35 (Umberg), Chapter 283, Statutes of 2023, made various modifications to the CARE Act in advance of the first cohort’s implementation of the CARE Act in 2023. 2023.
- SB 26 (Umberg), of the 2023-2024 Legislative Session, would have created the CARE Scholarship Program. SB 26 was vetoed by the Governor.
- SB 1338 (Umberg), Chapter 319, Statutes of 2022, enacted the CARE Act.
- SB 42 (Umberg), Chapter 640, Statutes of 2024 made various changes to the CARE Act, with an urgency clause so that the bill took effect in advance of the second cohort of counties’ implementation of the CARE Act on or before December 1, 2024.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
Alameda County Families Advocating for the Seriously Mentally Ill
Bakersfield, City of
Calchamber
California Advocates for Smi
California Big City Mayors Coalition
California Retailers Association
California State Association of Psychiatrists (CSAP)
City of Bakersfield
City of San Diego
Orange County Business Council
Treatment Advocacy Center
Oppose
Cal Voices
California Association of Mental Health Peer Run Organizations
California Foundation for Independent Living Centers
California Peer Watch
California State Association of Public Administrators, Public Guardians, and Public Conservators
California Youth Empowerment Network
County Behavioral Health Directors Association, (CBHDA)
County of Fresno
County of San Joaquin
Disability Rights California
Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund (DREDF)
Drug Policy Alliance
Hand in Hand
Homeless Union for Friendship and Freedom
Kelechi Ubozoh Consulting
Law Project for Psychiatric Rights (PSYCHRIGHTS)
Mental Health America of California
National Health Law Program
Racial and Ethnic Mental Health Disparities Coalition
The Coelho Center for Disability Law Policy and Innovation
Venice Justice Committee
Western Center on Law & Poverty
Western Regional Advocacy Project
Analysis Prepared by: Stella Choe / PUB. S. / (916) 319-3744
SB 1223 (Becker), Ch. 735, Stats. 2022. ↑
The Committee on the Revision of the Penal Code was established within the Law Review Commission through SB 94, Ch. 25, Stats. 2019 to study the Penal Code and recommend statutory reforms. ↑
Annual Report and Recommendations 2021, Committee on Revision of the Penal Code, http://www.clrc.ca.gov/CRPC/Pub/Reports/CRPC_AR2021.pdf, p. 17 (accessed July 3, 2025). ↑
Date of Hearing: July 1, 2025
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
Ash Kalra, Chair
SBPCA Bill Id:SB 27
Author:(Umberg) – As Amended Ver:June 17, 2025
SENATE VOTE: 39-0
SUBJECT: COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE, RECOVERY, AND EMPOWERMENT (CARE) COURT PROGRAM
KEY ISSUE: SHOULD THE NEWLY IMPLEMENTED CARE ACT BE MODIFIED YET AGAIN TO CHANGE BOTH ITS COURT PROCESS AND ITS CRITERIA TO QUALIFY FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE PROGRAM?
SYNOPSIS
Senate Bill 1338 (Umberg), Chapter 319, Statutes of 2022, established the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act, which provides community-based behavioral health (BH) services and supports, by means of a civil court process, to Californians living with untreated schizophrenia spectrum or other psychotic disorders and meet certain health and safety conditions. The CARE Act is intended to serve as an upstream intervention for individuals experiencing severe impairment to prevent more restrictive alternatives, including psychiatric hospitalizations, incarceration, Assisted Outpatient Therapy (AOT), and Lanterman-Petris-Short (LPS) conservatorship. This bill is the latest in a series of annual bills to modify the CARE Act which has been in effect statewide only since December 1, 2024. The bill proposes a number of changes to the still new CARE Act, modifying not only the process (including how respondents are referred to, determined to be eligible for participation, and graduated from the program), but also the criteria for program eligibility.
The CARE Act and CARE Courts are very popular among their supporters, but they are also a very expensive way to direct participants to much-needed services and assistance. Divided by the 100 CARE Act participants who were in the program statewide in 2023-24, the cost per participant during FY 2023-24 was $713,000. Future participation may increase (especially if the criteria for eligibility is greatly expanded), but costs also may increase over time. In comparison, Full-Service Partnership (FSP) programs, designed to provide treatment for, and services to, adults with serious mental illness (SMI) that is administered by counties, provides participants with housing, food, case management, and medical and mental health care, and substance abuse treatment and costs only about $16,666 per person per year. Also, while the CARE Act is designed to be voluntary, it has elements that are quite coercive.
This bill makes several significant changes to the CARE Act that are in the jurisdiction of this Committee. All of those provisions are explained in the analysis. Given the time pressures to hear this recently amended bill, no amendments are proposed to be taken at the Committee’s hearing. However, several amendments are recommended to the author and described in the analysis. Should the bill be approved by this Committee, it will be referred to the Assembly Committee on Health. It is supported by numerous organizations advocating for families of the mentally ill, the County of Los Angeles, the California Retailers Association, and a number of individuals, among others. Opponents include the numerous groups advocating for disability rights and civil rights, the County Behavioral Health Directors Association, the California Association of Public Administrators, Public Guardians, and Public Conservators, and others.
SUMMARY: Proposes a number of changes to the still newly implemented CARE Act to modify not only the process (including how respondents are referred, determined by the CARE Act court to be eligible for participation, and graduated from the program), but also the criteria for program eligibility. Specifically, this bill:
- Provides that if a defendant is found mentally incompetent to stand trial in a misdemeanor case, the trial, judgment, or hearing on the alleged violation shall be suspended and the court shall, after notice to the defendant, defense counsel, and the prosecution, hold a hearing to determine whether, to do one or more of the following:
- Conduct a hearing to determine if the defendant is “eligible and suitable” for diversion and in that case, grant diversion for a period not to exceed one year from the date the individual is accepted into diversion or the maximum term of imprisonment provided by law for the most serious offense charged in the misdemeanor complaint, whichever is shorter.
- Refer the defendant to the CARE Act court, if the court has reason to believe that the defendant may be eligible for the CARE program.
- Requires the CARE Act court to hold a hearing to determine eligibility for the CARE program within 30 court days after the date of the referral.
- Provides that if the hearing is delayed beyond 30 court days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in a county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing.
- Provides that if the defendant is accepted into the CARE program, the CARE Act court shall notify the criminal court of the acceptance, and the charges shall be dismissed six months after the date of the referral to the CARE program, unless the defendant’s case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that six-month time period.
- Provides that, except as provided in the proceedings related to an investigation of a defendant’s eligibility for CARE services or in proceedings related to Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT), the above provisions do not alter the confidential nature of CARE program proceedings.
- Provides that if a defendant is found mentally incompetent to stand trial in a misdemeanor case but ineligible “or unsuitable” for diversion, the court may refer the defendant to CARE, in which case all of the following would apply:
- The CARE Act court shall hold a hearing to determine eligibility for the CARE program within 14 court days after the date of the referral.
- If the hearing is delayed beyond 14 court days, the court shall order the defendant, if confined in a county jail, to be released on their own recognizance pending that hearing. If the defendant is accepted into the CARE program, the CARE Act court shall notify the criminal court of the acceptance, and the charges shall be dismissed pursuant to Section 1385 six months after the date of the referral to the CARE program, unless the defendant’s case has been referred back to the court prior to the expiration of that time period.
- Except as provided in the proceedings related to an investigation of a defendant’s eligibility for CARE services or in proceedings related to AOT, the above provisions do not alter the confidential nature of CARE program proceedings.
- Allows the county behavioral health agency and jail medical providers to share confidential medical records and other relevant information with the court, including, but not limited to, prior interactions with and treatment of the defendant, for the purpose of determining likelihood of eligibility for behavioral health services and programs pursuant to this section; but clarifies that the disclosure of information is subject to applicable state and federal privacy laws.
- Defines “clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment” (for purposes of the requirement that to qualify for CARE, a person must have a prerequisite mental condition and not be clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treament) to mean all of the following:
- The person’s condition is stable and not deteriorating.
- The person is likely to survive safely in the community without supervision.
- The person is currently engaged in treatment and managing symptoms through medication or other therapeutic interventions.
- The person’s mental health condition is not negatively impacting their ability to live safely within the community or current housing situation.
- Adds the following to the definition of “licensed behavioral health professional”:
- A nurse practitioner.
- A physician assistant.
- Modifies the criteria to qualify for CARE (limited to schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders under current law) to include “mood disorders with psychotic features, except psychosis related to current intoxication.”
- Permits a court, in a CARE Act proceeding, to hold the initial appearance concurrently with the prima facie determination as to a respondent’s CARE eligibility, provided that the requirements set forth in 8), below, are satisfied at the time of the prima facie determination.
- Provides that the conditions necessary to hold the initial appearance concurrently with the prima facie determination include the following:
- The petitioner is the director of a county behavioral health agency, or their designee.
- Counsel has been appointed to represent the respondent.
- The court has determined that the petition includes specified information.
- The County Behavioral Health Agency (CBHA) has been ordered to provide notice to the respondent and their counsel with notice of the proceeding, and to the CBHA where the respondent resides if different than the county where the CARE process has commenced.
- The petitioner is present at the hearing.
- The respondent is present at the hearing, has waived appearance through counsel, or is not present and the court has determined that proceeding without the participation or presence of the respondent is in the respondent’s best interest, as specified.
- A representative from the CBHA is present at the hearing.
- Allows a CARE court in its discretion, to call additional progress hearings beyond the hearing set at 60 days, for the duration of the CARE agreement.
- Requires that in order to be “graduated” from the CARE program, the court must approve the eligible participant’s request.
- Allows a court to refer an individual from AOT or LPS or in a proceeding finding them to be incompetent to stand trial for a misdemeanor, or incompetent to stand trial for a felony, to CARE Act court.
- In considering appropriateness of the referral pursuant to 11), provides that the CARE Act court may consider a referral made pursuant to this section to be a petition satisfying the requirements of the CARE Act if both of the following conditions are met:
- The referral contains information sufficient to otherwise satisfy the petition requirements of the CARE Act.
- The information included in the referral makes a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described as qualifying for CARE.
- Requires, if the CARE Act court elects to consider a referral to be a petition pursuant to 11), the CARE Act court to notify the referring court that the referral has been accepted as a petition for CARE Act proceedings.
- Requires, if the CARE Act court does not elect to consider a referral, the CARE Act court to order the appropriate petitioner candidate to do the following within 14 court days:
- Complete an investigation to determine whether to a file a petition on behalf of the referred individual.
- Notify the referring court whether it intends to file a CARE Act petition on behalf of the referred individual.
- Provides that if the appropriate petitioner candidate notifies the CARE Act court that it requires additional time to complete its investigation, the CARE Act court may grant an extension of up to 30 court days.
- Defines, for purposes of 11) -15), “appropriate petitioner candidate” to mean:
- For referrals from assisted outpatient treatment or from misdemeanor proceedings: the county behavioral health director or their designee.
- For referrals from conservatorship proceedings: the conservator or proposed conservator.
- Makes the bill an urgency statute that is necessitated by the following findings: “The CARE Act took effect in October 2023, and therefore important changes to the act must take effect immediately to ensure the CARE Act’s success in providing timely assistance to respondents.”
EXISTING LAW:
- Establishes the Lanterman-Petris-Short (LPS) Act, which provides for the involuntary detention for treatment and evaluation of people who are gravely disabled, as defined, or a danger to self or others. (Welfare & Institutions Code, div. 5, pt. 1, Sections 5000 et seq. All further statutory references are to this code, unless otherwise indicated.)
- Establishes the Assisted Outpatient Treatment Demonstration Project of 2002, which provides for court-ordered assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) under specified circumstances. (Div. 5, Part 1, Chap. 2, art. 9.)
- Establishes the CARE Act, which must be implemented by Glenn, Orange, Riverside, San Diego, San Francisco, Stanislaus, and Tuolumne Counties by October 1, 2023, and the remaining counties by December 1, 2024, subject to delays based on a state or local emergency, or discretionary approval by the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), up until December 1, 2025. Provides that the CARE Act only becomes operative upon DHCS, in consultation with county stakeholders, developing a CARE Act allocation to provide state financial assistance to counties to implement the CARE process. (Section 5970 et seq.)
- Defines, for purposes of the CARE Act, certain terms, including:
- "CARE agreement" is a voluntary settlement agreement, which includes the same elements as a CARE plan.
- "CARE plan" is an individualized, appropriate range of services and supports consisting of behavioral health care, stabilization medications, housing, and other supportive services, as provided.
- "Graduation plan" is a voluntary agreement entered into by the parties at the end of the CARE program that includes a strategy to support a successful transition out of court jurisdiction and may include a psychiatric advance directive. A graduation plan includes the same elements as a CARE plan to support the respondent in accessing services and supports. A graduation plan may not place additional requirements on the local government entities and is not enforceable by the court.
- “Licensed behavioral health professional” means either of the following:
- A licensed mental health professional, as defined in subdivision (j) of Section 4096.
- A person who has been granted a waiver of licensure requirements by the department pursuant to Section 5751.2.
- "Parties" are the person who file the petition, the respondent and the county behavioral health agency, along with other parties that the court may add if they are providing services to the respondent.
- "Petitioner" is the entity who files the CARE Act petition, but if other than the county behavioral health agency, the court is required, at the initial hearing, to substitute the director of county behavioral health agency or their designee as the petitioner, limiting the initial petitioner's rights to potentially receiving ongoing notice of the proceedings, and the right to make a statement at the hearing on the merits of the petition, with broader participation rights only if the respondent consents.
- "Respondent" is the person who is subject to the petition for the CARE process.
- "Supporter" is an adult who assists the respondent, which may include supporting the person to understand, make, communicate, implement, or act on their own life decisions during the CARE process, including a CARE agreement, a CARE plan, and developing a graduation plan. (Section 5971.)
- Provides that a respondent may qualify for the CARE process only if all of the following criteria are met:
- The person is 18 years of age or older.
- The person is currently experiencing a severe mental illness, as defined, and has a diagnosis identified in the disorder class: schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, as defined in the most current version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Specifically exempts specified other conditions or disorders.
- The person is not clinically stabilized in on-going voluntary treatment.
- At least one of the following is true:
- The person is unlikely to survive safely in the community without supervision and the person's condition is substantially deteriorating.
- The person is in need of services and supports in order to prevent a relapse or deterioration that would be likely to result in grave disability or serious harm to the person or to others.
- Participation in a CARE plan or agreement would be the least restrictive alternative necessary to ensure the person's recovery and stability.
- It is likely that the person will benefit from participation in a CARE plan or agreement. (Section 5972.)
- Allows a petition to initiate a CARE proceeding to be brought by one of the following adults:
- A person with whom the respondent resides or a spouse, parent, sibling, child, or grandparent of the respondent, or another individual who stands in loco parentis to the respondent.
- The director of a hospital, or their designee, in which the respondent is hospitalized, or the director of a public or charitable organization, agency, or home, or their designee, that is currently, or within the previous 30 days, providing behavioral health services to the respondent or in whose institution the respondent resides.
- A licensed behavioral health professional, or their designee, who is treating, or has been treating within the last 30 days, the respondent for a mental illness.
- A first responder, including a peace officer, firefighter, paramedic, emergency medical technician, mobile crisis response worker, or homeless outreach worker who has had repeated interactions with the respondent in the form of multiple arrests, multiple detentions, as provided, multiple attempts to engage the respondent in voluntary treatment or other repeated efforts to aid the respondent in obtaining professional assistance.
- The public guardian or public conservator, or their designee (and a respondent may be referred from conservatorship proceedings).
- The director of a county behavioral health agency of the county in which the respondent resides or is present (and a respondent may be referred from assisted outpatient treatment proceedings).
- The director of the county Adult Protective Services or their designee.
- The director of a California Indian health services program, California tribal behavioral health department, or their designee.
- The judge of a tribal court that is located in California, or their designee.
- The respondent. (Section 5974.)
- Requires the Judicial Council to develop a mandatory form for use to file a CARE process petition with the court and any other forms necessary for the CARE process; and request the petition to be signed under the penalty of perjury and contain specified information, including one of the following:
- An affidavit of a licensed behavioral health professional, stating that the licensed behavioral health professional or their designee has examined the respondent within 60 days of the submission of the petition, or has made multiple attempts to examine, but has not been successful in eliciting the cooperation of the respondent to submit to an examination, within 60 days of the petition, and that the licensed behavioral health professional had determined that the respondent meets, or has reason to believe, explained with specificity in the affidavit, that the respondent meets the diagnostic criteria for CARE proceedings.
- Evidence that the respondent was detained for a minimum of two intensive treatments pursuant to Article 4 (commencing with Section 5250) of Chapter 2 of Part 1, the most recent one within the previous 60 days. Evidence may include, but is not limited to, documentary evidence from the facility where the respondent was detained, or a signed declaration from the petitioner if the petitioner had personal knowledge of the detentions. (Section 5975.)
- Allows a court, if a criminal defendant is found to be mentally incompetent and ineligible for a diversion, to refer the defendant to the CARE program, as provided. (Penal Code Section 1370.1 (b)(1)(D)(iv).)
- Sets out the respondent's rights, including the right to be represented by counsel at all stages of a CARE proceeding, and requires the court to appoint specified counsel if the respondent does not have their own attorney. (Section 5976.)
- Provides that all CARE Act hearings are presumptively closed to the public. Allows the respondent to demand that the hearings be public or request the presence of a family member or friend without waiving their right to keep the hearing closed to the general public. A request by another party to make a hearing public may be granted if the court finds that the public interest clearly outweighs the respondent's privacy interest. (Section 5976.5.)
- Requires, for all CARE Act proceedings, that the judge control all hearings with a view to the expeditious and effective ascertainment of the jurisdictional facts and the ascertainment of all information relative to the present condition and future welfare of the respondent. Except where there is a contested issue of fact or law, requires the proceedings to be conducted in an informal, non-adversarial atmosphere with a view to obtaining the maximum cooperation of the respondent, all persons interested in the respondent's welfare, and all other parties, with any provisions that the court may make for the disposition and care of the respondent. (Section 5977.4 (a).)
- Upon receipt of a CARE Act petition, requires the court to promptly review the petition to see if it makes a prima facie showing that the respondent is or may be a person eligible for services under the CARE Act. (Section 5977 (a)(1).)
- If the court finds the petitioner has not made a prima facie showing that the respondent is or may be a person who is eligible for services under the CARE Act, the court shall dismiss without prejudice, except if the court finds that the petition is without merit, or intended to harass the respondent. Allows a petition to be refiled with new information. (Section 5977 (a)(2).)
- If the court finds the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that the respondent is or may be a person who is eligible for services under the CARE Act, and the petitioner is the county behavioral health agency, the court shall do all of the following: (i) set the matter for an initial appearance; (ii) appoint counsel; (iii) determine if the petition includes all the required information and, if not, order the county to submit a report with the information; and (iv) require notice be provided. (Section 5977 (a)(3)(A).)
- If the court finds the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that the respondent is or may be a person who is eligible for services under the CARE Act, and the petitioner is not the county behavioral health agency, the court shall order the county agency to investigate whether the respondent meets the eligibility criteria of the CARE Act and is willing to engage voluntarily with the county, file a written report with the court, and provide notice, as required by the Act. (Section 5977 (a)(3)(B).)
- Provides that if the county agency is making progress to engage the respondent, the agency may request up to an additional 30 days to continue to engage and enroll the individual in treatment and services. (Section 5977 (a)(4).)
- Requires, within five days of the receipt of the investigative report described above, the court to review the report and do one of the following:
- If the court determines that voluntary engagement with the respondent is effective, as provided, requires the court to dismiss the matter.
- If the court determines that the county's report supports the petition's prima facie showing that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, and engagement is not effective, requires the court to: (i) set an initial hearing within 14 days; (ii) appoint counsel, unless the respondent has their own counsel; and (iii) provide notice of the hearing, as provided.
- If the court determines that the county's report does not support the petition's prima facie showing that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, requires the court to dismiss the matter. (Section 5977 (a)(5).)
- Provides at the initial hearing:
- If the petitioner is not present, allows the court to dismiss the matter.
- If the respondent elects not to waive their appearance and is not present, allows the court to conduct the hearing in the respondent's absence if the court makes a finding on the record that reasonable attempts to elicit the attendance of the respondent have failed, and conducting the hearing without the participation or presence of the respondent would be in the respondent's best interest.
- Requires a county behavioral health agency representative to be present, allows a supporter to be appointed, and allows a tribal representative to attend for a respondent who is a tribal member, as provided, and subject to the respondent's consent.
- If the court finds that there is no reason to believe that the facts stated in the petition are true, requires the court to dismiss the case without prejudice, unless the court makes a finding on the record that the petitioner's filing was not in good faith.
- If the court finds that there is reason to believe that the facts stated in the petition appear to be true, requires the court to order the county behavioral health agency to work with the respondent and the respondent's counsel and CARE supporter to engage in behavioral health treatment. Requires the court to set a case management hearing within 14 days.
- If the petitioner is other than the county behavioral health director, substitutes the county behavioral health director or their designee for the petitioner, as specified.
- Requires the court to set a hearing on the merits of the petition, which may be conducted concurrently with the initial appearance on the petition upon stipulation of the petitioner and respondent and agreement by the court. (Section 5977 (b).)
- Provides at the hearing on the merits:
- If the court finds that the petitioner has not shown, by clear and convincing evidence, that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, requires the court to dismiss the case without prejudice, unless the court makes a finding, on the record, that the petitioner's filing was not in good faith.
- If the court finds that the petitioner has shown by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, requires the court to order the county behavioral health agency to work with the respondent, the respondent's counsel, and the supporter to engage in behavioral health treatment and determine if the parties will be able to enter into a CARE agreement. Requires the court to set a case management hearing. Requires notice to the tribe, if applicable. (Section 5977 (c).)
- Provides at the case management hearing:
- If the parties have entered, or are likely to enter, a CARE agreement, requires the court to approve or modify and approve the CARE agreement, stay the matter, and set a progress hearing for 60 days.
- If the court finds that the parties have not entered, and are not likely to enter, into a CARE agreement, requires the court to order a clinical evaluation of the respondent, as provided. Requires the evaluation to address, at a minimum, a clinical diagnosis, whether the respondent has capacity to give informed consent regarding psychotropic medication, other information, as provided, and an analysis of recommended services, programs, housing, medications, and interventions that support the respondent's recovery and stability.
- Requires the court to set a clinical evaluation hearing. (Section 5977.1.)
- Provides at the clinical evaluation review hearing:
- The court shall consider the evaluation, and other evidence, including calling witnesses, but only relevant and admissible evidence that fully complies with the rules of evidence may be considered by the court.
- If the court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, after review of the evaluation and other evidence, that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, requires the court to order the county behavioral health agency, the respondent, and the respondent's counsel and supporter to jointly develop a CARE plan.
- If the court finds, in reviewing the evaluation, that clear and convincing evidence does not support that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, requires the court to dismiss the petition. (Section 5977.1 (c).)
- Provides at the hearing to review the proposed CARE plan:
- The parties shall present their plan or plans to the court. (Section 5977.1 (d)(1).)
- The court shall adopt the elements of a CARE plan that support the recovery and stability of the respondent. Allows the court to issue any orders necessary to support the respondent in accessing appropriate services and supports, including prioritization for those services and supports, subject to applicable laws and available funding, as provided. These orders are the CARE plan. (Id, at (d)(2).)
- A court may order medication if it finds, upon review of the court-ordered evaluation and hearing from the parties that, by clear and convincing evidence, the respondent lacks the capacity to give informed consent to the administration of medically necessary stabilization medication. To the extent that the court orders medically necessary stabilization medications, prohibits the medication from being forcibly administered and the respondent's failure to comply with a medication order may not result in a penalty, including but not limited to a court order of contempt or imposition of accountability measures. (Id, at (d)(3).)
- Specifies that the above provisions do not prohibit the parties from agreeing to, and the court from approving, amendments to the CARE plan. The court may also approve amendments to the CARE plan upon the finding that those amendments are necessary to support the respondent in accessing appropriate services and supports, following a hearing on the issue. (Section 5977.1 (d)(7).)
- Requires that a status review hearing occur at least every 60 days during the CARE plan implementation. (Section 5977.2 (a)(1).)
- Requires the petitioner to file with the court, and serve on the respondent and the respondent's counsel and supporter, a report not less than five court days prior to the hearing, with specified information, including progress the respondent has made on the CARE plan, what services and supports in the CARE plan were provided, and what services and supports were not provided, and any recommendations for changes to the services and supports to make the CARE plan more successful.
- Allows the respondent to respond to the report and introduce their own information and recommendations.
- Allows the petitioner, the respondent, or the court to request more frequent reviews as necessary to address changed circumstances. (Section 5977.2 (a)(1)(A) – (b).)
- Requires the court, in the 11th month, to hold a one-year status hearing, which is an evidentiary hearing, to determine if the respondent graduates from the CARE plan or should be reappointed for another year.
- Requires a report by the petitioner before the status conference, as provided. Allows the respondent to call witnesses and present evidence.
- Provides that the respondent may be graduated from the CARE program and may be allowed to enter into a voluntary graduation plan with the county. However, such plan may not place additional requirements on the county and is not enforceable, other than a psychiatric advance directive if included.
- If the respondent elects to accept voluntary reappointment to the program, the respondent may request to be re-appointed to the CARE program for up to one additional year, subject to meeting certain criteria and court approval.
- Allows the court to involuntarily reappoint the respondent to the CARE program for up to one year if the court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that (i) the respondent did not successfully complete the CARE process; (ii) all of the required services and supports were provided to the respondent; (ii) the respondent would benefit from continuation of the CARE process; and (iv) the respondent currently meets the requirements for initial enrollment in the CARE program.
- Provides that a respondent may only be reappointed to the CARE program for up to one additional year. (Section 5977.3.)
- Provides mandatory timeframes, as well as continuances for good cause, throughout the CARE court proceedings. (Section 5977.1.)
- Allows the court, at any point in the proceedings, if it determines, by clear and convincing evidence, that the respondent, after receiving notice, is not participating in the CARE proceedings, to terminate respondent's participation in the CARE process. Allows the court to make a referral under the LPS Act, as provided. (Section 5979 (a).)
- Provides that all CARE plan services and supports ordered by the court are subject to available funding and all applicable federal and state statutes, regulations, contractual provisions and policy guidance governing program eligibility, as provided. (Section 5982 (d).)
- Sets forth rules by which a county is responsible for the costs of providing services to CARE participants. (Section 5982 (d) – (f).)
- Requires the Health and Human Services Agency, as provided, to (1) engage an independent, research-based entity to advise on the development of data-driven process and outcome measures to guide the planning, collaboration, reporting, and evaluation of the CARE Act; and (2) convene a working group to provide coordination and on-going engagement with, and support collaboration among, relevant state and local partners and other stakeholders throughout the phases of county implementation to support the successful implementation of the CARE Act, including during implementation. (Section 5983 (a).)
- Provides immunity to a county, or an employee or agent of a county, for any action by a respondent in the CARE process, except when the act or omission of a county, or the employee or agent of a county, constitutes gross negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct. (Section 5987.)
FISCAL EFFECT: As currently in print this bill is keyed fiscal.
COMMENTS: Senate Bill 1338 (Umberg), Chapter 319, Statutes of 2022, established the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act, which provides community-based behavioral health (BH) services and supports, by means of a civil court process, to Californians living with untreated schizophrenia spectrum or other psychotic disorders who meet certain health and safety conditions. The CARE Act is intended to serve as an upstream intervention for individuals experiencing severe impairment to prevent more restrictive alternatives, including psychiatric hospitalizations, incarceration, Assisted Outpatient Therapy (AOT), and Lanterman-Petris-Short (LPS) conservatorship. This bill is the latest in a series of annual bills to modify the CARE Act which has been in effect statewide only since December 1, 2024. The bill proposes a number of changes to the still new CARE Act, modifying not only the process (including how respondents are referred to, determined to be eligible for participation, and graduated from the program), but also the criteria for program eligibility. According to the author:
In 2023, CARE Court began as a pilot program in eight counties -- San Francisco, Glenn, Tuolumne, Stanislaus, Orange, Riverside, San Diego, and Los Angeles County. CARE Court is now an active program in all 58 counties as of December 2024. The pilot has revealed that creating a tailored voluntary treatment plan often takes many months to create and implement. Meanwhile, the respondents in CARE Court can suffer from these delays. SB 27 is designed to further refine the CARE Court processes by implementing changes, including but not limited to combing court hearings and expanding CARE eligibility.
Recent amendments (June 17, 2025) greatly expand the bill. As it is now in print, the bill has several provisions that are in the jurisdiction of this Committee, but also major provisions that are in the jurisdiction of other committees.
For example, the recent amendments propose numerous changes that are in the jurisdiction of the Assembly Committee on Health. Among other things, the bill would authorize the county behavioral health agency and jail medical providers to share confidential medical records and other relevant information with the court for the purpose of determining likelihood of eligibility for behavioral health services and programs. Most significantly, it expands the criteria for a person to be eligible for participation in the CARE program. These important issues—to the extent that they touch on civil rights and liberties—are briefly discussed in this analysis, but will be considered in full by the Assembly Committee on Health, to which the bill will be referred should it be approved by this Committee.
The recent amendments also make numerous changes to a Penal Code provision dealing with diversion from criminal proceedings of persons who are found incompetent to stand trial and referred to a CARE Act court; they primarily are in the jurisdiction of the Assembly Committee on Public Safety. For example, existing law requires a court, if a criminal defendant who is charged with a misdemeanor and found incompetent to stand trial and eligible for diversion, to grant diversion and only refer the defendant to the CARE program if the defendant were found to be ineligible for diversion. As recently amended, the bill allows a criminal court to refer the defendant—even if eligible for diversion--to a CARE Act court. As recently amended, the bill also would authorize a court to refer an individual from felony proceedings, as specified, to the CARE Act program. There are secondary issues (such as coordination between the criminal and CARE Act courts; the authority of the CARE Act court, rather than the criminal court, to determine eligibility; and the premise that participation in CARE is required to be voluntary and not coerced) that are in the jurisdiction of this Committee and are briefly discussed below. The bill will be referred to the Assembly Committee on Public Safety for analysis of issues in that committee’s jurisdiction should it be approved by the Committee on Health.
Background – CARE Proceedings. A central feature of the CARE Act are “CARE Courts,” intended to deliver mental health and substance use disorder (SUD) services as an alternative to incarceration in a jail or psychiatric facility of a person with schizophrenia or another psychotic disorder, or to that person becoming subject to an LPS conservatorship. The CARE Act provides for court-ordered CARE Plans for persons suffering from a mental health or SUD crisis for up to 12 months, with possible extensions. The plan is supposed to provide individuals with clinically appropriate, community-based services. These might include court-ordered stabilization medications, wellness and recovery support, help with finding social services and housing. “Court-ordered stabilization medication” is distinct from involuntary medication in that it cannot be forcibly administered. However, failure of a person to voluntarily participate in the medication treatment could lead to their referral to an LPS conservatorship, which critics say is coercive. (Section 5979 (a)(3)–(5).)
Since its inception, a central premise of the CARE Act is to focus on the most severely mentally ill, including those with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, in a collaborative and voluntary manner. As noted, while the overall purpose of the CARE Act is to provide essential services to the most severely ill, it also is supposed to preserve self-determination to the greatest extent possible. The California Health and Human Services Agency describes CARE Court as “an upstream diversion to prevent more restrictive conservatorships or incarceration.” (“CARE Court FAQ,” at chhs.ca.gov.) A CARE Act court could be an “appropriate next step” after someone has been placed on a 72-hour hold (“5150”) or a 14-day hold (“5250”), an arrest, or those who can otherwise be safely diverted from criminal proceedings. At the same time, it is designed and intended to be voluntary and collaborative. Unlike the courts in AOT and LPS proceedings, CARE Act courts do not have the authority to order a respondent in CARE proceedings to be medicated over their objection.
The Process: The first step in the CARE Act process is a petition submitted by a family member, mental health provider, or first responder, among others, that is filed with the court. The court then orders a clinical evaluation and appoints both an attorney and a “CARE Supporter” (a person assigned to help the participant understand the CARE Act process and provide the participant with as much autonomy as is feasible). If the CARE Act court finds that the person meets the criteria for the program, then the court orders the participant, CARE Supporter, and county behavioral health agency to develop a CARE Plan. The Court then reviews the Plan, and if the court approves it, the Plan becomes a court order lasting up to 12 months. In addition, the county behavioral care team, CARE Supporter, and participant, develop a Psychiatric Advance Directive which can be used in future crises: providing necessary background information shaped by the participant’s individual needs and history. Eventually, the participant “graduates” from the CARE program, although they may be provided with ongoing services, including assistance with finding housing. “Graduation” from CARE is designed to occur when a person in need of CARE services, including those who are mentally ill and unhoused, obtains housing of some sort.
As explained in more detail below, existing law provides that when a participant elects to be graduated from the program, the court “shall order” preparation of a graduation plan for that person. While “voluntary engagement” with the program is required and graduation is mandatory upon request (at least under current law), there are coercive and involuntary components of the program. For example, under unusual circumstances, a person can be “involuntarily reappointed to the program pursuant to Section 5977.3 (b), if the court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that all of the following conditions apply: (1) The respondent did not successfully complete the CARE process; (2) All services and supports required through the CARE process were provided to the respondent; (3) The respondent would benefit from continuation in the CARE process; and (4) The respondent currently meets the requirements in Section 5972. In that case, a respondent could be involuntarily reappointed to the CARE process once, for up to one additional year. (Section 5977.3 (c).) Finally, if a respondent fails to complete their CARE plan, the reasons for that failure shall be considered by the court in a subsequent LPS hearing, provided that hearing occurs within six months and provided that all the services and supports were offered to the respondent. The termination of a CARE plan does not automatically trigger LPS proceedings, and information about non-adherence to medications cannot be included. The failure to comply with a CARE plan will create a presumption for the LPS court that the respondent needs additional intervention beyond the services and supports provided by the CARE plan.
Criticism of the CARE Act. While the CARE Act has been championed by Governor Newsom and is largely popular among members of the Legislature, many civil liberties groups have expressed serious concerns about the model, including about its cost, and its impact on vulnerable communities. ACLU California Action summarized some of these concerns in its letter of opposition to 2023’s annual CARE Act bill by the author of this bill, SB 35 (Chap. 283, Stats. 2023) that, among other things, relaxed the criteria for who can be appointed as counsel for the subject of the proceeding and authorized a “court-appointed commissioner or other subordinate judicial officer” to preside over proceedings (in lieu of a superior court judge):
Proponents of CARE Court rely on false premises – that people are rejecting offers of housing; that access to behavioral health services based on one evaluation will solve a person’s mental health, disabilities; and, that a civil court is the least restrictive setting. In reality, low-cost housing stock is at a near record low and affordable housing options have years-long waitlists of people desperate for a home. Moreover, recovery is primarily found to be successful when accessible, affordable housing is combined with community-based treatment settings, surrounded by peers, and provided through voluntary, accessible means. When a person is faced with defending their case before a judge without agency over their own care, the least restrictive setting is not court.
CARE Court is also a costly mistake. Once implemented, this court system is likely to cost in excess of billions of dollars, as estimated by the Assembly Appropriations Committee. This state mandate will fail to deliver on what it promises to accomplish and will divert resources from other urgently needed programs. SB 35 will increase this cost further by increasing the amount of petitions, even though counties already report they do not have enough resources to implement the CARE Court program.
. . . By targeting people with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, studies show Black, Indigenous and People of Color will disproportionately experience the harms that CARE Court poses. SB 35 will increase CARE Court’s exploitation of poor people who need mental health care. It is those people with low incomes and/or from communities of color who will be most victim to the chilling effects CARE Court will have in preventing people from seeking treatment and care.
Instead of expanding access to CARE Court, the Legislature should fund more community-based mental health care treatment centers, increase housing funds for extremely low-income Californians, and decrease the presence of law enforcement and court involvement in mental health crises.
Critics point out that CARE is expensive, especially in light of the small number of participants it serves. According to a November 2024 report by the California Department of Health Care Services about the first 9 months of the program’s implementation in the 8 early implementation counties and Los Angeles (which opted to begin the CARE program early, despite not being identified in statute as an early implementing county), found the following (with preliminary data from Q3 of 2024 and preliminary yearly totals included in brackets):
557 petitions filed in the state [+231 = 788]
217 petitions dismissed
100 participants were in the program
362 individuals “diverted” from CARE Court to services.
(CARE Early Implementation Report, pp. 6-9, available at https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/Documents/CARE-Early-Implementation-Report-10-31.pdf.)
Meanwhile, during that same period (FY 2023-24), the state allocated $38.1 million to the courts and $33.3 million to HHS and DHCS (for data collection, county grants, and other activities), for a total of $71.3 million. (LAO (September 10, 2024) The 2024-25 California Spending Plan: Judiciary and Criminal Justice, available at https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/4924.) Divided by the 100 CARE Act participants, the cost of CARE court during FY 2023-24 was $713,000 per participant. Future participation may increase (especially if the criteria for eligibility is greatly expanded, as proposed by this bill), but costs also are likely to increase over time. Supporters of the CARE Act point out that many persons who do not qualify for, or who opt out of participation in CARE, are diverted to other services. But regardless of its effectiveness in directing individuals to services—as participants, or individuals who are diverted elsewhere-- the CARE model ends up being a very expensive way to coordinate (but not directly provide) important services.
In comparison, Full-Service Partnership (FSP) programs are designed to provide treatment for, and services to, adults with serious mental illness (SMI). It is administered by counties and provides participants with housing, food, case management, and medical and mental health care, and substance abuse treatment. “The foundation of Full Service Partnerships is doing “whatever it takes” to help individuals on their path to recovery and wellness.” (Eberhart, Nicole K. et al. Evaluation for the California Multi-County Full Service Partnership Innovation Project (April 4, 2024) Rand, available at https://www.calmhsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/RAND_FSP-Report-4.4.24.pdf.) According to the Rand Corporation, “[a]s of 2021, more than 60,000 individuals were enrolled in FSP programs throughout California, and FSP programs represented a $1 billion annual investment in public funds.” (Id., at p. 2.) Divided by the 60,000 participants, the cost of the FSP program is $16,666 per participant. Critics therefore reasonably question whether the CARE Act model is a wise allocation of resources.
The Committee may wish to consider: especially during a budget crisis, should scarce state funds be allocated directly to services, or to courts and CARE Act administrators?
This bill makes several significant changes to CARE Act court procedures, as well as the procedures for other courts to refer individuals to a CARE Act court, that are in the jurisdiction of this Committee.
First, in Section 1, the bill amends Penal Code Section 1370.01, regarding defendants who are found incompetent to stand trial and allowing them to be referred to a CARE Act court in lieu of automatic diversion from the criminal proceedings. As mentioned above, this issue primarily is in the jurisdiction of the Committee on Public Safety, but there are secondary issues – such as coordination between the criminal and CARE Act courts; the authority of the CARE Act court, rather than the criminal court, to determine eligibility; and the premise that participation in CARE is required to be voluntary and not coerced--that are in the jurisdiction of this Committee and therefore merit discussion.
As mentioned above, existing law requires a court, if a criminal defendant who is charged with a misdemeanor and found incompetent to stand trial and eligible for diversion, to grant diversion and only refer the defendant to the CARE program if the defendant is found ineligible for diversion. As recently amended, the bill allows a criminal court to refer the defendant—even if eligible for diversion--to a CARE Act court in lieu of diversion.
Given that participation in CARE services is meant to be voluntary and not coercive, the author may wish to clarify that prior to referring a defendant to a CARE Act court, the court must advise the defendant of other available treatment options, including mental health diversion, and obtain the defendant’s agreement to the CARE Act court referral.
Second, in perhaps the most substantive and controversial change to the CARE Act of the bill, the June 17th amendments (in Section 3 of the bill) propose to change the mental health criteria for CARE Act eligibility. While this issue is primarily in the jurisdiction of the Assembly Committee on Health, it touches on secondary issues that are within the jurisdiction of this Committee because it greatly expands the universe of mental health conditions (and persons suffering from those conditions) who could qualify for treatment under the CARE Act and therefore affects rights and liberties of a larger cohort of the population. According to the letter of opposition submitted by the County Behavioral Health Directors Association, data from the National Institute of Mental Health shows, “The general population with some form of mood disorders is approximately 9.7%1 in any given year, whereas the population with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders is between 0.33 and 0.75%. The population experiencing bipolar disorder in any given year is closer to 2.8%.”
Given that the CARE Act, since its inception and through its very short time of implementation, has always sought to focus on the most severely mentally ill, including those with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, the Committee may wish to consider whether it is appropriate to greatly expand the program after less than one year of being in effect throughout the state.
Third, in Section 4, the bill provides that a court may conduct a hearing regarding an initial petition “concurrently . . . with the prima facie determination.” The author’s goal is to consolidate hearings. But according to CARE Act experts at the Judicial Council of California, no hearing is necessary to determine prima facie evidence of eligibility.
The author may wish to strike out the current amendments to Section 4 of the bill and instead add language to clarify that no prima facie hearing is required.
Fourth, in Section 5, the bill clarifies that the court “may, in its discretion, call additional progress hearings beyond the hearing set at 60 days, for the duration of the CARE agreement.” This appears to be a reasonable way for the court and parties to ensure that the CARE agreement is being followed and is effective.
Fifth, in Section 6, the bill somewhat troublingly takes away the provision in existing law that provides for automatic graduation from CARE proceedings unless the respondent requests to not graduate and continue participating in the program. As mentioned above, existing law provides that when a participant “elects” (or “requests”) to be graduated from the program, the court “shall order” preparation of a graduation plan. (Section 5977.3 (a)(3)(A).) The bill proposes to instead provide for graduation upon the respondent’s request only if the court “approves the request.” But the bill provides no guidance or standards for the court’s approval.
Given that existing law already allows a respondent to be “involuntarily reappointed” to the program pursuant to Section 5977.3 (b), the author may wish to consider striking this vague and unnecessary provision from the bill.
Sixth, in Section 7, the bill provides that a court may refer an individual who has been found incompetent to stand trial from both misdemeanor proceedings, or from felony proceedings to the CARE Act court and that in either case, “The CARE Act court may consider a referral made pursuant to this section to be a petition [under the CARE Act] if both of the following conditions are met:”
(1) The referral contains information sufficient to otherwise satisfy the petition requirements in Section 5975.
(2) The information included in the referral makes a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972.
This provision is well-intentioned – to avoid unnecessary and duplicative hearings – but it may not be as clear as it could be. For example, would the referral have to include all of the information required to be included in a CARE Act petition, or just enough to be “sufficient to satisfy” the requirements, and what does “sufficient” mean? And why shouldn’t all of the information be required to be provided to the CARE Act court for its consideration and for it to substitute for a petition?
As the bill moves forward, the author may wish to require, for the referral to constitute a petition for purposes of the CARE Act that, “The referral contains all of the information required to be included in a petition pursuant to Section 5975” (or other wording to that effect).
Section 7 grants the CARE Court the authority, if information in the referral does not provide all of the information necessary for a petition, to direct that an investigation be conducted. This seems like an appropriate clarification of the law.
Related Past Legislation: SB 42 (Umberg, Ch. 640, Stats. 2024) made various changes to the CARE Act, with an urgency clause so that the bill took effect in advance of the second cohort of counties’ implementation of the CARE Act on or before December 1, 2024.
SB 35 (Umberg, Ch. 283, Stats. 2023) made various modifications to the CARE Act in advance of the first cohort’s implementation of the CARE Act in 2023.
SB 1338 (Umberg, Ch. 319, Stats. 2022) enacted the CARE Act.
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: Families Advocating for the Seriously Mentally Ill (FASMI), which describes itself as a group of family members of the seriously mentally ill and health care providers, writes:
SB 27 provides a reasonable schedule for getting people, including people in the justice system who have been found incompetent to stand trial, into CARE Court if the court finds that appropriate. It clarifies that a person who already has some kind of case management is still eligible for CARE court if they are not clinically stable. It provides for a reasonable exit from CARE Court by letting a judge continue to review the results of a program after 60 days.
. . . We hope you move SB 27 forward without damaging amendments from patients’ rights advocates. These advocates do not speak for our family members who are deteriorating and in danger, the people CARE Court was designed to help.
The County of Los Angeles writes:
As an early adopter of the CARE Act, Los Angeles County remains committed to its successful implementation and supports thoughtful refinements to the law. SB 27 represents a valuable and timely step forward, and we appreciate your leadership on this issue.
The California Retailers Association explains why they support the bill:
As a business association leader in California, we write in strong support of Senate Bill 27 (Umberg), which strengthens the CARE Court Program. Homelessness is a crisis that affects all of us, and CARE Court offers a compassionate, innovative approach to addressing this issue, one that resonates with the values and concerns of the majority of Californians. It has become an all-too-common feature of our communities, impacting public safety, public health, and the overall well-being of our neighborhoods. SB 27 is a valuable step toward ensuring the CARE Act can operate efficiently and effectively in reversing the tide of homelessness in our state.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: A coalition of civil rights groups and disability advocates writes that they are opposed to SB 27 because of its vast expansion of CARE Act eligibility, especially given its inherently coercive elements:
CARE Court threatens an individual’s fundamental rights to privacy, autonomy, and liberty. Under the CARE Court program, individuals can be subject to court-ordered CARE plans or court-overseen CARE agreements. Court-ordered CARE plans bind a respondent to comply with specific behavioral health services that are not the respondent’s choice and to which they may actively object. This directly impinges on their autonomy privacy right to make medical decisions about their own bodies and minds. Even though CARE agreements are purported to be voluntary, there are significant concerns about coercion, because an individual is subject to a CARE plan if a CARE agreement is not agreed to, and the judge may still make changes to the CARE agreement before final approval. SB 27 would expand court oversight of CARE agreements by allowing courts to call for status hearings beyond 60 days, increasing the coerciveness and cost. . . . SB 27 would exacerbate CARE Court’s many problematic features by significantly expanding the program.
The California Association of Public Administrators, Public Guardians, and Public Conservators writes the following:
We are particularly concerned with the expansion of CARE to include all mood disorders. This is a significant increase in the population eligible for the services available through CARE without providing any additional resources, particularly the housing necessary to accomplish this expansion. This expansion also represents a fundamental change in the goals of the CARE Act while counties are in the process of implementing the Act across all 58 counties.
The County Behavioral Health Directors Association has a number of specific concerns with the bill’s recent amendments that modify the CARE Act in its early stages and also object to the lack of transparency surrounding the June 17th amendments:
Introduced on the first day of the 2025-2026 legislative session, December 2, 2024, with minimal contents, SB 27 (Umberg) was substantially amended on June 17, 2025, to propose a significant expansion of referrals into as well as individuals eligible for CARE Court. CARE Court is currently in the process of being implemented by county behavioral health and courts across all 58 counties. While county behavioral health agencies are proud of the work we have done to successfully implement CARE Court thus far, we have significant concerns about the proposed changes proposed by this bill.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
Alameda County Families Advocating for the Seriously Mentally Ill
California Advocates for SMI
California Retailers Association
California State Association of Psychiatrists (CSAP)
City of Bakersfield
City of San Diego
County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors
Treatment Advocacy Center
Four individuals
Opposition
Cal Voices
California Association of Mental Health Peer Run Organizations
California Foundation for Independent Living Centers
California State Association of Public Administrators, Public Guardians, and Public Conservators
California Youth Empowerment Network
County Behavioral Health Directors Association (CBHDA)
County of Fresno
Disability Rights California
Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund (DREDF)
Drug Policy Alliance
Kelechi Ubozoh Consulting
Law Project for Psychiatric Rights (PSYCHRIGHTS)
Mental Health America of California
National Health Law Program
Racial and Ethnic Mental Health Disparities Coalition
The Coelho Center for Disability Law Policy and Innovation
Western Center on Law and Poverty
Analysis Prepared by: Alison Merrilees / JUD. / (916) 319-2334
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | SB 27 |
THIRD READING
Bill No: SB 27
Author: Umberg (D)
Introduced: 12/2/24
Vote: 27 - Urgency
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE: 12-0, 4/8/25
AYES: Umberg, Niello, Allen, Arreguín, Ashby, Caballero, Durazo, Laird, Valladares, Wahab, Weber Pierson, Wiener
NO VOTE RECORDED: Stern
SUBJECT: Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Court Program
SOURCE: Author
DIGEST:
This bill permits a CARE court to conduct the initial appearance hearing concurrently with its determination on whether the petition makes a prima facie case of CARE eligibility, provided certain conditions are met.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- Establishes the Lanterman-Petris-Short (LPS) Act, which provides for the involuntary detention for treatment and evaluation of people who are gravely disabled, as defined, or a danger to self or others. (Welfare & Institution (Welf. & Inst.) Code, division (div.) 5, part (pt.) 1, §§ 5000 et seq.)
- Establishes the Assisted Outpatient Treatment Demonstration Project of 2002, which provides for court-ordered assisted outpatient treatment under specified circumstances. (Welf. & Inst. Code, div. 5, pt. 1, chapter 2, article 9.)
- Establishes the CARE Act. (Welf. & Inst. Code, div. 5, pt. 8, §§ 5970 et seq.)
- Defines the following relevant terms:
- “Care agreement” is a voluntary settlement agreement entered into by the parties, and includes the same elements as a CARE plan to support the respondent in accessing community-based services and supports.
- “Care plan” is an individualized, appropriate range of community-based services and supports, which include clinically appropriate behavioral health care and stabilization medications, housing, and other supportive services, as appropriate.
- “CARE process” is the court and related proceedings to implement the CARE Act.
- “Court-ordered evaluation” means an evaluation ordered by the court in connection with a CARE Act petition, as specified.
- “Department” is the Department of Healthcare Services (DHCS).
- “Petitioner” is the entity who files a CARE Act petition with the court; if the petitioner is a person other than the director of a county behavioral health agency (CBHA), or their designee, the court shall substitute the director or their designee for the county in which the proceedings are filed as the petitioner at the first hearing.
- “Respondent” is the person who is subject to the petition for the CARE process. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5971.)
- Requires the CARE Act to be implemented as follows:
- A first cohort of counties, including Glenn, Orange, Riverside, San Diego, Stanislaus, Tuolumne, and the City and County of San Francisco, shall begin no later than October 1, 2023.
- A second cohort of counties, representing the remaining counties in the state, shall begin no later than December 1, 2024.
- DHCS shall issue guidelines under which counties can apply for, and be provided, additional time in which to implement the CARE Act, subject to certain conditions and restrictions; DHCS may grant only one extension per county, and the latest a county may implement the CARE Act is December 1, 2025. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5970.5.)
- Establishes criteria for a person to qualify for the CARE process, including that the person is 18 years of age or older; the person is experiencing a serious mental disorder, as defined, and has a diagnosis in the disorder class of schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders; the person is not clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment; and participation in a CARE plan or agreement would be the least restrictive alternative necessary to ensure the person’s recovery and stability. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5972.)
- Establishes which adult persons may file a petition to commence the CARE Act process for another person, including a person with whom the potential respondent resides, specified relatives of the potential respondent, and specified medical and public health professionals. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5974.)
- Allows a court, if a criminal defendant is found to be mentally incompetent and ineligible for a diversion, to refer the defendant to the CARE program, as provided. (Penal (Pen.) Code, § 1370.1(b)(1)(D)(iv).)
- Establishes the rights of the respondent, including the right to receive notice of the hearings and the court-ordered evaluation; the right to be represented by counsel at all stages of a CARE proceeding, regardless of ability to pay; the right to present evidence and call witnesses; and the right to an interpreter in all proceedings if necessary for the respondent to fully participate. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5976.)
- Establishes the following process as the CARE process:
- Upon receipt of a CARE petition, the court must promptly review the petition.
- If the petitioner is the CBHA, and the court determines that the petition establishes a prima facie case of CARE eligibility, the court must set the matter for an initial hearing within 14 days.
- If the petitioner is not the CBHA, and the petition establishes a prima facie case of CARE eligibility, the court must order the CBHA to investigate whether the respondent satisfies the CARE Act criteria and file a report to that effect within 14 court days. If the evidence in the report supports the prima facie showing of the respondent’s CARE eligibility, the court must set the matter for an initial hearing within 14 court days.
- The court must appoint counsel for the respondent when it determines that the petition makes a prima facie showing of CARE eligibility.
- At the initial hearing, the court must determine whether there is reason to believe that the facts of the petition are true; if the court so determines, the court must order the CBHA to work with the respondent, the respondent’s counsel, and the respondent’s CARE supporter to engage in behavioral health treatment. If the court does not dismiss the petition, the court must set a hearing on the merits of the petition; this may be conducted simultaneously with the initial hearing if the parties so stipulate.
- At the hearing on the merits, the court must determine whether the CBHA has established, by clear and convincing evidence, that the petitioner meets the CARE criteria. If the criteria are met, the court must order the CBHA to work with the respondent, respondent’s counsel, and the respondent’s supporter to engage the respondent in behavioral health treatment and attempt to enter into a CARE agreement; the court must also set a case management hearing within 14 days.
- At the case management hearing, the court shall hear evidence as to whether the parties have entered, or are likely to enter, a CARE agreement. If the parties have entered a CARE agreement, the court can approve or modify the CARE agreement and set the matter for a progress hearing. Otherwise, the court can continue the matter for another 14 days of discussions, or order the CBHA to conduct a clinical evaluation of the respondent that addresses the respondent’s diagnosis and condition. The court shall set a clinical evaluation hearing to review the evaluation within 21 days.
- At the clinical evaluation hearing the court shall review the evaluation and other evidence to determine whether the respondent, by clear and convincing evidence, meets the CARE criteria. If the court so finds, the court must order the CBHA, the respondent, respondent’s counsel, and respondent’s supporter to jointly develop a CARE plan within 14 days, and set a CARE plan hearing within 14 days.
- At the CARE plan hearing, the court may consider the plan or plans submitted by the parties and adopt elements of a CARE plan that support the recovery and stability of the respondent. The issuance of an order approving a CARE plan begins the one-year CARE plan timeline.
- After the adoption of a CARE plan, the court shall hold status review hearings at least every 60 days; prior to each hearing, the CBHA must file and serve a report on the respondent’s status and progress on the CARE plan.
- At the end of one year, the respondent may elect to be graduated from the program or remain in the program for one additional year. The court may also involuntarily reappoint the respondent to the program if certain conditions are met. In no event may a respondent remain in the program for longer than two years total. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 5977-5977.3)
- Establishes conditions under which the court may dismiss a petition or continue a hearing during the CARE process set forth in 10). (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 5977-5977.3)
- Allows the court, at any point during CARE proceedings, if it determines, by clear and convincing evidence, that the respondent, after receiving notice, is not participating in the CARE process or is not adhering to their CARE plan, to terminate the respondent’s participation. The court is then permitted to make a referral under the LPS Act, as provided. (Welf. & Inst. Code § 5979(a).)
- Provides that, if a respondent was timely provided with all services and supports required by their CARE plan, the fact that the respondent failed to successfully complete the plan and reasons for that failure (a) are facts to be considered by a court in a subsequent hearing under the LPS Act, provided that the hearing occurs within six months of termination of the CARE plan; and (b) create a presumption at that hearing that the respondent needs additional interventions beyond the supports and services provided by the CARE plan. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5979(a)(3).)
- Creates a process for penalizing counties or other local government entities that do not comply with CARE court orders. (Welf. & Inst. Code § 5979(b).)
- Provides that either a respondent or a CBHA may appeal an adverse court determination. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5979(c).)
This bill:
- Permits a CARE court to hold the initial appearance concurrently with the prima facie determination as to a respondent’s CARE eligibility, provided that specified requirements are satisfied at the time of the prima facie determination.
- Provides that the conditions necessary to hold the initial appearance concurrently with the prima facie determination include:
- Counsel has been appointed to represent the respondent.
- The court has determined that the petition includes specified information.
- The CBHA has been ordered to provide notice to the respondent and their counsel with notice of the proceeding, and to the CBHA where the respondent resides if different than the county where the CARE process has commenced.
- The petitioner is present at the hearing.
- The respondent is present at the hearing, has waived appearance through counsel, or is not present and the court has determined that proceeding without the participation or presence of the respondent is in the respondent’s best interest, as specified.
- A representative from the CBHA is present at the hearing.
Comments
In 2022, the Legislature enacted the CARE Act. The CARE Act is intended to provide essential mental health and substance use disorder services to severely mentally ill Californians—many of whom are homeless or incarcerated—while also preserving these individuals’ self-determination to the greatest extent possible. The CARE process is largely overseen by the courts, which are charged with ensuring that eligible individuals—termed “respondents”—are delivered mental health and substance use disorder services, as an alternative to involuntary conservatorship or imprisonment.
In the early stages of the CARE process, the court must hold a hearing to determine whether the petition presents a prima facie case that the respondent meets the requirements for CARE Act participation; if the court makes that finding, the court must then hold a second hearing, within 14 court days, at which the respondent will make an initial appearance. The prima facie determination is made on an ex parte basis, i.e., without the presence of the respondent, whereas the respondent generally must be present at the initial appearance hearing (or waive presence through counsel).
In order to move qualified CARE participants through the process more efficiently, this bill allows a court to hold the prima facie determination concurrently with the initial appearance hearing, provided that specified requirements are met. These requirements include counsel having been appointed for the respondent; notice having been provided to the respondent and their counsel; and the court having determined that the petition includes specified information regarding the respondent’s condition, the outcome of efforts made to voluntarily engage the respondent, and conclusion and recommendations about the respondent’s ability to voluntarily engage in services.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No Local: No
SUPPORT: (Verified 4/9/25)
None received
OPPOSITION: (Verified 4/9/25)
California Peer Watch
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: According to California Peer Watch:
Existing law authorizes a specified individual to commence the CARE process, known as the original petitioner and authorizes the court to dismiss a case without prejudice when the court finds that a petitioner has not made a prima facie showing that they qualify for the CARE process.
This bill would allow the court to conduct the initial appearance on the petition at the same time as the prima facie determination.
This seems to be a rush to judgement which would tend to have the effect of inadequate consideration with increased opportunities for violating the rights of an individual who may or may not have a debilitating mental health condition.
Prepared by: Allison Whitt Meredith / JUD. / (916) 651-4113
4/9/25 15:48:09
**** END ****
Senator Thomas Umberg, Chair
2025-2026 Regular Session
Bill No: SB 27 (Author:Umberg)
Version: December 2, 2024
Hearing Date: April 8, 2025
Fiscal: No
Urgency: Yes
Consultant: AWM
SUBJECT
Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Court Program
DIGEST
This bill permits a CARE court to conduct the initial appearance hearing concurrently with its determination on whether the petition makes a prima facie case of CARE eligibility, provided certain conditions are met.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2022, the Legislature enacted the CARE Act. The CARE Act is intended to provide essential mental health and substance use disorder services to severely mentally ill Californians—many of whom are homeless or incarcerated—while also preserving these individuals’ self-determination to the greatest extent possible. The first counties implemented the CARE Act in October 2023; all counties in the state were required to begin accepting CARE petitions as of December 1, 2024, unless they received an implementation extension from the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS). As the CARE Act has been implemented across the state, stakeholders have figured out what works well and what needs improvement; according to the author, one ongoing concern is the length of time it takes to go through the CARE process and develop an individually tailored CARE agreement or plan for a qualified respondent.
This bill is intended to give courts the discretion to reduce the timeframe for the CARE process by allowing a CARE court to conduct two hearings concurrently—the hearing on whether the petition establishes a prima facie case that the respondent meets the CARE criteria, and the initial appearance hearing—provided that certain requirements are met. These requirements include counsel being appointed for the respondent; notice of the hearing being provided to the respondent and their counsel; and the court having determined that the petition includes specified required information.
This bill is sponsored by the author. The Committee has not received timely opposition to this bill.
PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE LAW
Existing law:
- Establishes the Lanterman-Petris-Short (LPS) Act, which provides for the involuntary detention for treatment and evaluation of people who are gravely disabled, as defined, or a danger to self or others. (Welf. & Inst. Code, div. 5, pt. 1, §§ 5000 et seq.)
- Establishes the Assisted Outpatient Treatment Demonstration Project of 2002, which provides for court-ordered assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) under specified circumstances. (Welf. & Inst. Code, div. 5, pt. 1, ch. 2, art. 9.)
- Establishes the CARE Act. (Welf. & Inst. Code, div. 5, pt. 8, §§ 5970 et seq.)
- Defines the following relevant terms:
- “Care agreement” is a voluntary settlement agreement entered into by the parties, and includes the same elements as a CARE plan to support the respondent in accessing community-based services and supports.
- “Care plan” is an individualized, appropriate range of community-based services and supports, which include clinically appropriate behavioral health care and stabilization medications, housing, and other supportive services, as appropriate.
- “CARE process” is the court and related proceedings to implement the CARE Act.
- “Court-ordered evaluation” means an evaluation ordered by the court in connection with a CARE Act petition, as specified.
- “Department” is the DHCS.
- “Petitioner” is the entity who files a CARE Act petition with the court; if the petitioner is a person other than the director of a county behavioral health agency (CBHA), or their designee, the court shall substitute the director or their designee for the county in which the proceedings are filed as the petitioner at the first hearing.
- “Respondent” is the person who is subject to the petition for the CARE process. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5971.)
- Requires the CARE Act to be implemented as follows:
- A first cohort of counties, including Glenn, Orange, Riverside, San Diego, Stanislaus, Tuolumne, and the City and County of San Francisco, shall begin no later than October 1, 2023.
- A second cohort of counties, representing the remaining counties in the state, shall begin no later than December 1, 2024.
- DHCS shall issue guidelines under which counties can apply for, and be provided, additional time in which to implement the CARE Act, subject to certain conditions and restrictions; DHCS may grant only one extension per county, and the latest a county may implement the CARE Act is December 1, 2025. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5970.5.)
- Establishes criteria for a person to qualify for the CARE process, including that the person is 18 years of age or older; the person is experiencing a serious mental disorder, as defined, and has a diagnosis in the disorder class of schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders; the person is not clinically stabilized in ongoing voluntary treatment; and participation in a CARE plan or agreement would be the least restrictive alternative necessary to ensure the person’s recovery and stability. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5972.)
- Establishes which adult persons may file a petition to commence the CARE Act process for another person, including a person with whom the potential respondent resides, specified relatives of the potential respondent, and specified medical and public health professionals. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5974.)
- Allows a court, if a criminal defendant is found to be mentally incompetent and ineligible for a diversion, to refer the defendant to the CARE program, as provided. (Pen. Code, § 1370.1(b)(1)(D)(iv).)
- Establishes the rights of the respondent, including the right to receive notice of the hearings and the court-ordered evaluation; the right to be represented by counsel at all stages of a CARE proceeding, regardless of ability to pay; the right to present evidence and call witnesses; and the right to an interpreter in all proceedings if necessary for the respondent to fully participate. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5976.)
- Establishes the following process as the CARE process:
- Upon receipt of a CARE petition, the court must promptly review the petition.
- If the petitioner is the CBHA, and the court determines that the petition establishes a prima facie case of CARE eligibility, the court must set the matter for an initial hearing within 14 days.
- If the petitioner is not the CBHA, and the petition establishes a prima facie case of CARE eligibility, the court must order the CBHA to investigate whether the respondent satisfies the CARE Act criteria and file a report to that effect within 14 court days. If the evidence in the report supports the prima facie showing of the respondent’s CARE eligibility, the court must set the matter for an initial hearing within 14 court days.
- The court must appoint counsel for the respondent when it determines that the petition makes a prima facie showing of CARE eligibility.
- At the initial hearing, the court must determine whether there is reason to believe that the facts of the petition are true; if the court so determines, the court must order the CBHA to work with the respondent, the respondent’s counsel, and the respondent’s CARE supporter to engage in behavioral health treatment. If the court does not dismiss the petition, the court must set a hearing on the merits of the petition; this may be conducted simultaneously with the initial hearing if the parties so stipulate.
- At the hearing on the merits, the court must determine whether the CBHA has established, by clear and convincing evidence, that the petitioner meets the CARE criteria. If the criteria are met, the court must order the CBHA to work with the respondent, respondent’s counsel, and the respondent’s supporter to engage the respondent in behavioral health treatment and attempt to enter into a CARE agreement; the court must also set a case management hearing within 14 days.
- At the case management hearing, the court shall hear evidence as to whether the parties have entered, or are likely to enter, a CARE agreement. If the parties have entered a CARE agreement, the court can approve or modify the CARE agreement and set the matter for a progress hearing. Otherwise, the court can continue the matter for another 14 days of discussions, or order the CBHA to conduct a clinical evaluation of the respondent that addresses the respondent’s diagnosis and condition. The court shall set a clinical evaluation hearing to review the evaluation within 21 days.
- At the clinical evaluation hearing the court shall review the evaluation and other evidence to determine whether the respondent, by clear and convincing evidence, meets the CARE criteria. If the court so finds, the court must order the CBHA, the respondent, respondent’s counsel, and respondent’s supporter to jointly develop a CARE plan within 14 days, and set a CARE plan hearing within 14 days.
- At the CARE plan hearing, the court may consider the plan or plans submitted by the parties and adopt elements of a CARE plan that support the recovery and stability of the respondent. The issuance of an order approving a CARE plan begins the one-year CARE plan timeline.
- After the adoption of a CARE plan, the court shall hold status review hearings at least every 60 days; prior to each hearing, the CBHA must file and serve a report on the respondent’s status and progress on the CARE plan.
- At the end of one year, the respondent may elect to be graduated from the program or remain in the program for one additional year. The court may also involuntarily reappoint the respondent to the program if certain conditions are met. In no event may a respondent remain in the program for longer than two years total. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 5977-5977.3)
- Establishes conditions under which the court may dismiss a petition or continue a hearing during the CARE process set forth in 10). (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 5977-5977.3)
- Allows the court, at any point during CARE proceedings, if it determines, by clear and convincing evidence, that the respondent, after receiving notice, is not participating in the CARE process or is not adhering to their CARE plan, to terminate the respondent’s participation. The court is then permitted to make a referral under the LPS Act, as provided. (Welf. & Inst. Code § 5979(a).)
- Provides that, if a respondent was timely provided with all services and supports required by their CARE plan, the fact that the respondent failed to successfully complete the plan and reasons for that failure (a) are facts to be considered by a court in a subsequent hearing under the LPS Act, provided that the hearing occurs within six months of termination of the CARE plan; and (b) create a presumption at that hearing that the respondent needs additional interventions beyond the supports and services provided by the CARE plan. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5979(a)(3).)
- Creates a process for penalizing counties or other local government entities that do not comply with CARE court orders. (Welf. & Inst. Code § 5979(b).)
- Provides that either a respondent or a CBHA may appeal an adverse court determination. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5979(c).)
This bill:
- Permits a CARE court to hold the initial appearance concurrently with the prima facie determination as to a respondent’s CARE eligibility, provided that specified requirements are satisfied at the time of the prima facie determination.
- Provides that the conditions necessary to hold the initial appearance concurrently with the prima facie determination include:
- Counsel has been appointed to represent the respondent.
- The court has determined that the petition includes specified information.
- The CBHA has been ordered to provide notice to the respondent and their counsel with notice of the proceeding, and to the CBHA where the respondent resides if different than the county where the CARE process has commenced.
- The petitioner is present at the hearing.
- The respondent is present at the hearing, has waived appearance through counsel, or is not present and the court has determined that proceeding without the participation or presence of the respondent is in the respondent’s best interest, as specified.
- A representative from the CBHA is present at the hearing.
COMMENTS
- Author’s comment
According to the author:
In 2023, CARE Court began as a pilot program in eight counties -- San Francisco, Glenn, Tuolumne, Stanislaus, Orange, Riverside, San Diego, and Los Angeles County. CARE Court is now an active program in all 58 counties as of December of 2024. The pilot has revealed that creating a tailored voluntary treatment plan often takes many months to create and implement. Meanwhile, the respondents in CARE Court can suffer from these delays. SB 27 is designed to address this lengthy court process by allowing a court to combine both the initial appearance and prima facie determination in one hearing in order to more efficiently build treatment plans for CARE Court participants and avoid duplicative hearings and court appearances.
2. The CARE Act and its implementation
In 2022, the Legislature enacted the CARE Act.[1] The CARE Act is intended to provide essential mental health and substance use disorder services to severely mentally ill Californians—many of whom are homeless or incarcerated—while also preserving these individuals’ self-determination to the greatest extent possible.
The CARE Act has been implemented in two phases. The first cohort of counties—comprised of the Counties of Glenn, Orange, Riverside, San Diego, Stanislaus, and Tuolumne, and the City and County of San Francisco—implemented the CARE Act on October 1, 2023.[2] The remaining counties were required to implement the CARE Act by the end of last year.[3] DHCS may approve an implementation delay if a county experiences a state or local emergency and the implementation is necessary as a result of that emergency; an extension may be granted only once per county, and to no later than December 1, 2025.[4] According to a press release issued by the Judicial Council of California, all 58 counties began accepting CARE petitions as of December 1, 2024.[5]
DHCS issued its first report to the Legislature on the first cohort’s implementation of the CARE Act in November 2024.[6] The report included data for the County of Los Angeles, which was not in the first cohort but elected to implement early.[7] In the last quarter of 2023 and the first two quarters of 2024, 557 CARE petitions were filed, 217 of which were dismissed by the court, in large part because the respondents did not meet the requisite criteria for participation.[8] Among the individuals who remained in the process, over 100 people had already been connected to services and housing, and another 240 people were still working through the process; the first participant graduated from CARE court in August 2024.[9] DHCS’s next report on the CARE Act will be submitted to the Legislature this July.[10]
3. The CARE process
The CARE process is largely overseen by the courts, which are charged with ensuring that eligible individuals—termed “respondents”—are delivered mental health and substance use disorder services, as an alternative to involuntary conservatorship or imprisonment. The California Health and Human Services Agency describes the CARE process as “an upstream diversion to prevent more restrictive conservatorship or incarceration.”[11]
The CARE process is unique within the state insofar as the court process can be initiated by a person who has a relationship with the potential respondent; other mental health procedures that go through the courts, such as AOT, require a county actor to initiate the process.[12] Eligible petitioners include the CBHA; a spouse, parent, sibling, child, or grandparent of the respondent; a treating behavioral health professional; the county public guardian or public conservator; and other enumerated persons and entities.[13]
There are strict criteria for CARE Act eligibility, including that the respondent suffer from a serious mental disorder, as defined; not be currently clinically stabilized in on-going voluntary treatment; and either be unlikely to survive safely in the community, or need services and supports to avoid grave disability or the risk of serious harm to themselves or others.[14] The CARE Act also imposes strict, and short, deadlines for the CARE process; for example, after a petition is filed, the court must set the matter for an initial appearance on the petition within 14 court days if the petition establishes a prima facie case for CARE eligibility;[15] and if the court orders a clinical evaluation of the respondent, the hearing to review the evaluation must be held within 21 days, and the evaluation must be provided to the respondent’s counsel no later than five days before that hearing.[16]
The CARE Act provides for two avenues to a court-ordered set of services. If the respondent and the CBHA are able to agree on a plan, it is known as a “CARE agreement”; the court may approve that agreement and set further hearings to monitor the respondent’s progress under the agreement.[17] If parties are unable to reach an agreement, one or both parties may present a proposed “CARE plan” to the court; the court may accept a proposed plan or adopt a modified plan, which becomes a court order that lasts for up to one year.[18] The CARE Plan may provide for behavioral health services and housing supports, as well as other services.[19] The court may order medication only if it finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that the respondent lacks the capacity to give informed consent to the administration of medically necessary stabilization medication; to the extent such medication is administered, the medication may not be forcibly administered, and the respondent’s failure to comply with a medication order shall not result in a penalty, such as terminating the CARE process.[20]
Eleven months after the CARE Plan was put in place, the court shall hold a hearing to determine whether to graduate the respondent from the CARE Plan or whether, with or without the consent of the respondent, as specified, to keep the respondent in the CARE program.[21] A respondent may be appointed to the CARE process only once, for up to one additional year.[22]
3. This bill permits a CARE court to hold the initial appearance hearing and prima facie determination hearing concurrently, provided certain requirements are met
As discussed above, the CARE process currently requires the court to hold a hearing to determine whether the petition presents a prima facie case that the respondent meets the requirements for CARE Act participation; if the court makes that finding, the court must then hold a second hearing, within 14 court days, at which the respondent will make an initial appearance.[23] The prima facie determination is made on an ex parte basis, i.e., without the presence of the respondent, whereas the respondent generally must be present at the initial appearance hearing (or waive presence through counsel).
In order to move qualified CARE participants through the process more efficiently, this bill allows a court to hold the prima facie determination concurrently with the initial appearance hearing, provided that specified requirements are met. These requirements include counsel having been appointed for the respondent; notice having been provided to the respondent and their counsel; and the court having determined that the petition includes specified information regarding the respondent’s condition, the outcome of efforts made to voluntarily engage the respondent, and conclusion and recommendations about the respondent’s ability to voluntarily engage in services. As a practical matter, it appears that the prima facie determination can be combined with the initial appearance hearing only in cases where the CBHA is the petitioner, because in all other instances, the court is required to order the CBHA to make certain findings at the prima facie determination hearing that must be presented to the court before the initial appearance can be set.
The CARE Act already permits the initial appearance hearing to be held concurrently with the hearing on the merits of the petition, provided that the parties so stipulate and the court approves.[24] By allowing the prima facie determination hearing to be held concurrently with the initial appearance hearing, this bill could enable all three hearings—prima facie determination, initial appearance, and merits determination—to be heard at once, but again, only if the petitioner and respondent so stipulate and the court approves.
SUPPORT
None received
OPPOSITION
None received
RELATED LEGISLATION
Pending legislation:
SB 823 (Stern, 2025) expands the CARE Act criteria for participation to include individuals who have a diagnosis of bipolar I disorder. SB 823 is pending before the Senate Health Committee.
SB 367 (Allen, 2025) among other things, permits the reports, evaluations, diagnoses, or other information filed about a CARE court respondent to be used by a CBHA for use in a conservatorship petition under the LPS Act, as specified. SB 367 is pending before the Senate Health Committee.
SB 331 (Menjivar, 2025) among other things, modifies the CARE Act to allow an original petitioner who is not a CBHA to remain involved in the CARE proceeding under certain circumstances, and requires DHCS to provide training on the electronic submission of CARE Act forms. SB 331 is pending before the Senate Health Committee.
Prior legislation:
SB 42 (Umberg, Ch. 640, Stats. 2024) made various changes to the CARE Act, with an urgency clause so that the bill took effect in advance of the second cohort of counties’ implementation of the CARE Act on or before December 1, 2024.
SB 35 (Umberg, Ch. 283, Stats. 2023) made various modifications to the CARE Act in advance of the first cohort’s implementation of the CARE Act in 2023.
SB 1338 (Umberg, Ch. 319, Stats. 2022) enacted the CARE Act.
**************
Umberg, Ch. 319, Stats. 2022. ↑
Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5970.5(a). ↑
Id., § 5970.5(b). ↑
Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5970.5(c). ↑
Judicial Council of California, Press Release: California Courts Implement CARE Act Statewide (Dec. 2, 2024), https://newsroom.courts.ca.gov/news/california-courts-implement-care-act-statewide. All links in this analysis are current as of April 4, 2025. ↑
DHCS, The Care (Community, Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment) Act: Early Implementation: First 8 County Care Courts, First 9 months, First 900 People (Nov. 2024), available at https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/Documents/CARE-Early-Implementation-Report-10-31.pdf. ↑
Id. at p. 6. ↑
Id. at pp. 7-8. ↑
Id. at pp. 4, 11. ↑
See id. at p. 11. ↑
See CalHHS, Community Assistance, Recovery & Empowerment Act, https://www.chhs.ca.gov/care-act/. ↑
E.g., Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5346 (AOT petition must be filed by a county behavioral health director or their designee; specified family members or other persons may request that a petition be filed, but may not file the petition themselves). ↑
Id., § 5974. ↑
Id., § 5972. ↑
Id., § 5977. ↑
Id., § 5977.1(b). The court may continue the evaluation hearing for a maximum of 14 days upon stipulation of the respondent and the CBHA, unless there is good cause for a longer extension. ↑
Id., § 5977.1(a)(2). ↑
Id., § 5977.1(d). ↑
Id., § 5982. ↑
Id., § 5977.1(d)(3). ↑
Id., § 5977.3. ↑
Ibid. ↑
Id., § 5977. ↑
Id., § 5977(b)(7)(B). ↑
Discussed in Hearing
Senate Floor
Assembly Floor
Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Assembly Standing Committee on Health
Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary
Senate Floor
Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):