Bills

SB 645: Juries: peremptory challenges.

  • Session Year: 2025-2026
  • House: Senate

Current Status:

Passed

(2025-10-11: Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 656, Statutes of 2025.)

Introduced

First Committee Review

First Chamber

Second Committee Review

Second Chamber

Enacted

Version:

Existing law provides for the exclusion of a prospective juror from a trial jury by peremptory challenge. Existing law prohibits a party from using a peremptory challenge to remove a prospective juror on the basis of, among other things, the prospective jurors race, ethnicity, or gender. Existing law allows a party, or the trial court on its own motion, to object to the use of a peremptory challenge based on these criteria. Upon objection, existing law requires the party exercising the challenge to state the reasons the peremptory challenge has been exercised. Existing law requires the court to evaluate the reasons given, as specified, and, if the court grants the objection, authorizes the court to take certain actions, including, but not limited to, starting a new jury selection, declaring a mistrial at the request of the objecting party, seating the challenged juror, or providing another remedy as the court deems appropriate. Under existing law, one of the circumstances the court may consider includes whether the counsel or counsels office exercising the challenge has used peremptory challenges disproportionately against a given race, ethnicity, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, national origin, or religious affiliation, or perceived membership in any of these groups, in the present case or in past cases, as specified. Existing law, until January 1, 2026, prohibits the application of these provisions to civil cases.

This bill would extend the prohibition against application of these provisions to civil cases indefinitely, except as specified, including cases involving a civil rights violation and cases for the civil commitment of a person. The bill would require the party bringing specified claims to notify the court and the other party or parties of the applicability of these provisions in those civil cases, as specified. The bill would limit the courts consideration of counsel or counsels office use of peremptory challenges in the present case or in past cases, as described above, to when counsel or counsels office is a public entity.

Discussed in Hearing

Senate Floor2MIN
Sep 12, 2025

Senate Floor

Assembly Floor4MIN
Sep 11, 2025

Assembly Floor

Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary10MIN
Jul 8, 2025

Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary

Senate Floor8MIN
Jun 4, 2025

Senate Floor

Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary19MIN
Apr 8, 2025

Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary

View Older Hearings

News Coverage:

SB 645: Juries: peremptory challenges. | Digital Democracy