Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations

All right. The Senate Committee on Appropriations will come to order. We do not have a quorum, but we're going to start as a Subcommittee. For individuals wishing to comment via teleconference line. The participation number is 877-226-8163. That's 877-226-8163. The access code is 114-7276. Again, 114-7276. Obviously, we're holding our Committee hearing in the O Street Building this morning. And please, Members of the Committee, come on down to room 2200 so we can establish our quorum and take some actions.

We have 51 bills on today's agenda, one of which will be up for a due pass motion. The remaining items are all suspense candidates, and I believe all the authors have waived their presentation. But, of course, we will still take public comment on all of those bills. We don't have a quorum, as mentioned, and we're going to move on to the business of the day. I see that Mr. Low. Where is he? There he is. He's hiding. Mr. Low is here.

So we will go right to our due pass. Right to our due pass action. It is ACA 5 by Assemblymember Low and many others. As mentioned, we do not have a quorum, so you will not hear us take a vote, Mr. Lowe, but it's good to see you. And good morning.

Likewise. Thank you very much, Mr. Chair for allowing me to present Assembly Constitutional Amendment 5. It is always the right time for love. Love is priceless and respectfully ask for an aye vote when you've established the quorum.

Thank you. Do you have witnesses in support?

Also have two individuals representing Equality California and ACLU.

Good morning, Mr. Chair. Craig Pulsar on behalf of Equality California, proud co sponsor of ACA 5. As you know well, marriage quality is currently the law of the land set thanks to several previous decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court. However, it's becoming increasingly clear that the current Supreme Court cannot be trusted to uphold their precedent or protect our civil rights. Last year, the Court overturned 50 years of precedent affirming the constitutional right to an abortion.

And just last month, the Court decided to once again ignore years of precedent and allow certain businesses to discriminate against LGBTQ people. ACA 5 is an important and necessary safeguard in case the Court were to once again ignore years of precedent and roll back protections for same-sex or interracial couples to marry. The measure will put a constitutional amendment before voters to repeal Proposition Eight, erasing a dark part of California history, and protect once and for all the fundamental freedom to marry.

Administrative costs associated with putting ACA 5 on the ballot are worthwhile to ensure Californians continue to enjoy the freedom to marry. And they represent a much smaller price tag than the potential cost of trying to defend marriage equality should the Supreme Court overturn any of its previous decisions. ACA 5, of course, will not end discrimination against LGBTQ people, nor will it end the hateful attacks we are seeing against the community across the country.

However, it is an important opportunity to reaffirm the freedom to marry as a fundamental right and protect same sex and interracial couples who deserve to have their marriages respected under the law. We are grateful to Assembly Member Low for bringing this measure forward and respectfully urge your aye vote.

And I'll keep it short. Becca Kramer-Madder on behalf of ACLU California Action. Also proud co-sponsors.

Wonderful. Is there anyone else here wishing to speak in support?

Good morning. Taylor Thompson, on behalf of Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kunalakis, as a proud co-sponsor. In support. Thank you.

Izzy Silner with San Francisco Board of Supervisors. In support. Thank you.

Is there any opposition in the room? Moderator is there anyone on the phone line wishing to weighed in either support or opposition.

James Michael Paula with, Ask Me California in strong support. Thank you.

Sylvia Solica here on behalf of the California Faculty Association, in strong support. Thank you.

Thank you for your support or opposition of ACA 5, you may press one and then zero. We will go to line 21. Your line is open.

Thank you. Mr. Chair, we have no further support or opposition in queue.

All right, we've taken our support and opposition. We've gone to the phone line. Does finance have a file?

No file.

No file. And I see no questions or comments from my colleagues. Mr. Lowe\, would you like to close?

Thank you for your love.

Thank you. As a proud co author of this, I'm sure the Bill will do well in Committee. Thank you for being here. It's our only due pass, and obviously when we have a quorum, we'll take a motion on that. So we will go back to the top of our agenda. We have AB 19 by Assembly Member Patterson on pupil health and opioid antagonists. Ms. Ashby, are you ready for a trivia question or should I give you more time?

I'm almost awake. Go for it.

All right, our trivia question today is an R&B boy band from the 80s had a couple of hits, cool It Now and Mr. Telephone man.

Zero, I do know I remember those songs. But the 80s?

I'll give you a hint, Bobby Brown was in the band.

New edition.

New edition. We got it right. Look at that. See you're. One for one.

Yeah. Almost awake. Okay.

Almost awake. All right. For those of you who are just tuning in, we do intersperse trivia questions to keep the morning fun. AB 19. Mr. Patterson? Pupil health, opioid Antagonist. It is a suspense candidate. The author's wave presentation will open up the public comment to see if anybody would like to grace us at the microphone. Seeing no one come to the microphone in favor, how about opposition? Seeing no opposition, we will go to the moderator.

Moderator, is there anyone on the phone line wishing to talk to us about AB 19?

Thank you. Supporter opposition of AB 19. You may press one and then zero. And we'll go line 19. Your line is open.

Mr. Chair, Tony Tucaro on behalf of the California Teachers Association in support thank you.

Thank you. And we do have one more, one moment while they get their line number. And we'll go to line 20. Your line is open.

Good morning, Chair and Members. I am Elaine Buset calling on behalf of San Diego County District Attorney Summer Stefan. We are in support of AB 19. Thank you.

Thank you. And Mr. Chair, we have no more support or opposition in queue.

All right, we've taken support and opposition. We will go to finance.

Finance is currently opposed to the Bill. We estimate the cost up to 3.5 million. Proposition 98 General Fund for the local education agencies to purchase and stock the minimum of two units. At this time, we also assume these costs would be on top of the 3.5 million ongoing Proposition 90 General Fund included in the Education Omnibus Trailer Bill SB 1114.

All right, we've taken comments from everyone and we have no questions from my colleagues. So when we have a quorum, we will deal with AB 19. Moving on AB 48 Aguiar-Curry, Nursing Facilities Resident Informed Consent Protection Act of 2023 It's a suspense candidate. The author's wave presentation will open up the public comment right here in room 2200 with nobody at the microphone wishing to speak in favor. Anybody wishing to oppose. Seeing no opposition moderator will go to the phone line on AB 48.

Thank you. If you're in support or opposition of AB 48, you may press one and then zero. Mr. Chair, we have no one in queue.

No one in queue. We'll come back to Finance on 48.

Finance is currently opposed to AB 48. We estimate a cost of $166,000 in 23-24 out of the Licensing and Certification Fund. And we are opposed because of the additional cost pressures on that Fund.

All right, we've heard from the public, from Finance and no questions from my colleagues. So when we have a quorum, we will deal with AB 48. AB 57 Karla on California Pocket Forest Initiative. It is a suspense candidate. The author's way presentation will open up public comment right here in this room. There's nobody wishing to come speak to us in support of AB 57. Is there any opposition of AB 57?Seeing no opposition, moderator is there anyone on the phone line who wants to speak about AB 57.

Thank you. If you're in support or opposition of AB 57, you may press one and then zero again. That is one and then zero. If you're in support of opposition of AB 57 and we do have a few in queue. One moment, we'll go to line 11. Your line is open.

Yes, good morning, Alexis Delhi on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in support thank you, thank you.

And next we'll go to line 22. Your line is open.

for CleanEarthForKids.org in support.

Thank you. And next we'll go to line 25. Your line is open.

Thank you. We have no further support or opposition in queue.

Suzanne Hume cleanearthforkids.org, strongly support.

No further support or opposition. Finance. Do we have a file on AB 557?

We do. Finance is currently opposed to AB 57. We show a cost of $313,000 in 23-24 and $253,000 ongoing, plus one position. In addition, we would note that there's some unknown General Fund costs associated with the grant funding.

All right. We've taken support, opposition and Finance, and we don't have a quorum. Mr. Mckayley, I have a very difficult question, so I'm coming to you. So, on 5/7, May 7, Michigan ratified the 27th Amendment. What was significant about the 27th Amendment?

I was there.

You were there? You were there. Alright. AB 71. Yes. It was a good government amendment, too. That's why it took 203 years to pass. Anyway, AB 71, Rodriguez, Pupil Instruction, Bleeding Control. It is a suspense candidate. The author's waived presentation. And we'll go to public comment and see if anybody wants to speak in favor of AB 71. There's nobody here to speak in favor of AB 71. Is there anyone wishing to speak in opposition of AB 71? No. Moderator anyone on the phone line?

Thank you. If you are in support of opposition of AB 71, you may press one and then zero. And we have no one in queue.

No one in queue. Finance, do you want to tell us about AB 71?

Finance is currently opposed to AB 71. While we know it has only minor and absorbable costs, we are opposed to the bill because it's duplicative, as the Commission already has a process to consider the inclusion of specific subject areas in the state's curriculum framework.

Alright, seeing no questions from my colleagues, we will move on to AB 84 by Dr. Weber on social determinants of... Sorry, 85. Social Determinants of Health Screening and Outreach. It's a suspense candidate. The good doctors has waived presentation. We'll open up the public hearing. Is there anyone wishing to speak in favor of AB 85? Seeing no one come to the microphone. Is there anyone wishing to oppose AB 85? There's movement in the gallery, but it's going in the opposite direction. Must be something I said. Seeing no one opposing AB 85. Moderator is there anyone on the phone line wishing to support or oppose AB 85?

Thank you. If you're in support or opposition of AB 85, you may press one and then zero. We will go to line 15. Your line is open.

Mr. Chair and Members, Nicole Wordelman on behalf of the Children's Partnership, in support.

Thank you. And Mr. Chair, we have no further support or opposition in queue.

No further support or opposition. Do we have a Finance file?

Finance is currently opposed to AB 85. We note a cost of $125,000 in 23/24 for the California Department of Insurance, as well as a cost of $114,000 and 24/25 also for the California Department of Insurance for their administration of the bill. In addition, we note a cost of $5.078 million in 23-28 out of the General Fund for the Department of Healthcare Access and Information. Where opposed is it creates cost pressures not included in the 2324 budget plan. And the cost could also potentially increase healthcare premiums.

Thank you for that. But here's a question for you. What is the nickname of the operating system that was originally called Microsoft Disk. Who knows what the nickname was? Dos. MS-DOS. It was originally called Microsoft Disk. See, you knew that. No, he knew. Alright, we've heard from finance. We almost heard the answer. But no. No questions or comments from my colleagues. So we will move on from AB 85 to Dr. Weber's next bill. AB 576. Medic. I'm still on 80s. I didn't get through my 80s list yet.

Hurry up. Get to 90s.

80s are tough.

Yeah.

Good music. AB 576, Dr. Weber, Medi-Cal Reimbursement for Abortion Services. It is a suspense candidate. The office waived presentation will open up the public comment right here in this room. Seeing no one come. Oh, you're coming to the microphone. You're an oppose? You're support. Alright, come on up.

Good morning. Taylor Thompson on behalf of Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis, in support. Thank you.

Do you want a question?

Oh my God. Don't ask her 80s questions, that was like 20 years...

You want a question? Which band consisted of siblings, had the hits in 1980s, You Got It All and Make It Real?

Jackson...

Who knows? Siblings. You Got It All and Make It Real.

Brothers. Starts an H. What's their name?

The Jets. The Jets. Alright, anyone else in support? Anyone else in opposition? Seeing no support or opposition. We'll go to the phone line. We have to get to the 90s, so we get some yes answers. Alright. Moderator.

Thank you. If you're in support or opposition of AB 576, you may press one and then zero. And Mr. Chair, we have no one in queue.

We have no one in queue. Then we'll come back to Finance on 576.

No file.

No file. And we have no questions or comments. Wait, we have a quorum now, right? We have a quorum. So that is AB 576. Let's establish our quorum.

Senator Portantino? I'm here. Portantino, here. Senator Jones? Senator Ashby? Here. Ashby, Here. Senator Bradford? Bradford, here. Senator Seyarto? Here. Seyarto, here. Senator Wahab? Senator Wiener?

We have a quorum. So with the quorum... With the quorum, we're going to go to our do pass amendment or new pass recommendation, which is ACA 5, Low, Marriage Equality. Is there a motion to pass ACA 5? We have a motion. Would you call the roll?

ACA 5, the motion is do pass to the Senate Floor. Senator Portantino? Aye. Portantino, aye. Jones? Ashby? Aye. Ashby, aye. Bradford? Bradford aye. Seyarto? Wahab? Wiener?

Keep it on call. Alright. So ACA 5 will stay on call. We're going to go back to AB 19, Patterson. Seeing no objections. Without objection, AB 19 will move to the suspense file. AB 48, Aguiar-Curry. Without objection, will move to the suspense file. AB 57, Kalra. Seeing no objections. Without objection, AB 57 will move to the suspense file. AB 71, Rodriguez. It is no questions or comments or objections, so without objection, AB 71 will move to the suspense file. AB 85, Weber.

It is without objection, move to the suspense file. AB 576, Weber. Seeing no objections. Without objection, AB 576 moves to the suspense file. We're going to move on to AB 274, Bryan on CalWORKS, CalFresh eligibility, income exclusions. It's a suspense candidate. The author's waived presentation, and we will go to public comment. Seeing no one here wanting to... Are you moving to come support? Alright, we have support on AB 274.

Yes. Good morning. James Michael Powell with AFSCME California. in support.

Anyone else in support? Seeing no other support, let's go to opposition. Is there any opposition? No opposition. Let's go to the phone line for 274.

Thank you. If you're in support or opposition of AB 274, you may press one and then zero. And we will go to line 15. Your line is open.

Nicole Wordelman on behalf of the Children's Partnership, in support.

Thank you. Line 16, your line is open.

Mr. Chair, Members. Geoff Neill on behalf of the County of San Diego, in support.

Thank you. Line 32. Your line is open.

Hello. My name is Anna Mathews. I'm with the Faculty Association of California Community Colleges, and we are in strong support. Thank you.

Thank you. Mr. Chair, we have no further support or opposition in queue.

Alright, we'll come back to Finance on 274.

No file.

No file. No questions or comments. So without objection, AB 274 will move to the suspense file. AB 424, Bryan, Neurogenerative Disease Registry. It is a suspense candidate. The author's waived presentation. We'll open up the public comment right here in this room with nobody wishing to grace us with support of 424. How about opposition of 424? How about we go to the phone line on support or opposition for 424?

Thank you. If you're in support or opposition of AB 424, you may press one and then zero. And Mr. Chair, we have no one in queue.

No one in queue on 424. Do we have a file?

Finance is currently opposed to AB 424. We note an annual cost of just over 1 million General Fund from 24-25 through 27-28 to expand the data infrastructure. And we believe any request for additional resources should be evaluated as part of the annual budget development process.

Alright, we've heard from Finance. We have no questions or comments from my colleagues. So without objection, 424 moved to the suspense file. AB 297, Vince Fong, Wildfires Local Assistance Grant Program. It's a suspense candidate. Mr. Micheli has moved to the microphone and is ready to grace us with a comment in support of AB 297.

Good morning, Mr. Chair and Members. Chris Micheli on behalf of the Humboldt and Mendocino Redwood Companies, in strong support of the bill. Thank you.

But did you know...

I thought you already gave me one.

I have another one.

Okay.

SNH green stamps. Oh, I just gave the punchline. I messed up my own question.

SNH question. The trading stamps. What color were they?

Say it anyway. I love those. My grandma...

Green.

They started in the 1960s, and they ended in the 1980s. Yes, I messed up.

You also had the blue chip.

Well, this one just had the green. Alright, who sang Here I Go Again?

White Snake. There you go. See, the gallery gets it right. Alright, moving on. That was 297.

Get out of the 80s.

We've taken. You did your thing? Right? 297? No, we're opening up 297. Micheli went favor. Any opposition to 297? We'll go to the phone line. We'll go to the phone line for support or opposition of 297. Takes a village.

Thank you. If you're in support of AB 297, you may press one and then zero. Mr. Chair, we have no one in queue.

We have no one in queue. Now we'll come back to Finance.

No file.

And we have no file, and we have no questions. So without objection, AB 297, will move to suspense. AB 345, Wilson on Habitat Restoration, Flood Control. It is a suspense candidate, the author's waive presentation. We will open up the public hearing right here in room 2200 with nobody coming to the microphone. How about opposition? Nobody wants to oppose this bill. So we'll go to the microphones to see if anybody is on the phone line wishing to support or oppose AB 345.

If you're in support or opposition of AB 345, you may press one, then zero. And Mr. Chair, there's no one in queue.

No one in queue. Finance?

No file.

No file. No questions. Without objection, 345 will move to the suspense file. AB 360, Gipson, Excited Delirium. That is a great description. Excited Delirium. If there's anyone wishing to come and speak about excited delirium, please come to the microphone now. No one coming in support. Any opposition? Is there any opposition? No opposition. How about we go to the phone line for support or opposition of AB 360 by Assembly Member Gipson, who waived presentation.

Thank you. If you're in support or opposition of AB 360, you may press one and then zero. Mr. Chair, there is no one in queue.

No one in queue. And let's see if we have a file from Finance.

No file.

No file, no comments, no questions. Without objection, AB 360 will go to suspense. AB 694, Gipson, Teachers Teacher Residency Apprenticeship Program. It is a suspense candidate. The author's wave presentation. we'll open up the public hearing in this room with nobody coming to speak in favor. How about opposition? We have no opposition takers. We will go to the phone line to see if there's anyone who wants to speak on AB 694.

Thank you. For support or opposition of AB 694, you may press one and then zero. And Mr. Chair, there is no one in queue.

No one in queue. Do we have a file?

Finance is currently opposed. AB 694. We note that the requirements of the bill create substantial increase in workload associated with federal requirements. The Commission on Teacher Credentialing reports it would require four consultants as well as four AGPAS. And Finance estimates that would cost us approximately 1.2 million non-proposition 98 General Fund annually until 2029.

Alright, we've heard from Finance. We have no questions from my colleagues, so without objection, AB 694 will go to suspense. AB 384, Calderon on school facilities, recommended interior temperatures, inventory of heating and cooling systems. It is a suspense candidate. The author's waive presentation. We'll open public comment. See if anybody wants to speak in favor of 384. We have no one speaking in favor of it. How about any opposition to 384? We have no opposition. How about we go to the phone line to see if there's anyone at home that has got bored with their television and wants to talk to us about AB 384?

Thank you. If you're in support of opposition of AB 384, you may press one and then zero. And, Mr. Chair, no one's in queue.

They're all enthralled with Price is Right at home and they don't have time for us. Alright, finance, 384.

Finance is currently opposed to AB 384. We noted an estimated cost of $115,000 one time General Fund to conduct the research study as well as significant GO bond cost pressures. For example, could create bond cost pressures of 7.5 million to 10 million for every 100 classrooms that need a replacement HVAC system.

Alright, we've heard from Finance. We have no questions or comments from my colleagues. So without objection, AB 384 will move to the suspense file. Mr. Bradford? In Spaceballs, Mel Brooks had a takeoff on Jabba the Hut. What was the character in Spaceballs that was the takeoff of Jabba the Hut? Was the Star Wars parody. Pizza the Hut. Pizza the Hut. Need to get out. Alright. AB 527, Calderon, urban forestry, school, greening projects. It is a suspense candidate.

The author's waive presentation will open up the public comment right here in Room 2200 with nobody speaking in favor. How about we have opposition? We have no opposition to 527. So let's go to the phone line for support or opposition of 527.

Thank you. For support or opposition of AB 527, you may press one and then zero. We'll go to line 25. Line 25, your line is open. We will go on to the next one. Let's see, one moment here. Line 30, your line is open.

Lendri Purcell with Families Advocating for Chemical and Toxic Safety, in strong support.

Thank you. Mr. Chair, we have no further support or opposition. Thank you.

Alright, we've taken our support and opposition. We'll come back to Finance on AB 527.

Finance is currently opposed to AB 527. We note unknown but significant General Fund cost pressures for grants. We would also note that the 23-24 budget included $150 million for school greening grant projects, 117 million one time General Fund, and 33 million from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund.

Thank you for that. And you get an Academy Award for that. You know why? Because on 5/27, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences Sciences was established in 1927. Did you know that? See that? How about that? Every day. Any questions or comments from my colleagues? Seeing none. Without objection, AB 527, will go to suspense. AB 1172, Calderon, integrated energy policy report, fusion energy. It is a suspense candidate. The authors waive presentation will open up the public hearing for 1172.

Seeing no one come to speak in favor. How about opposition of 1172? Seeing no opposition 1172, we'll go to the phone line for support or opposition of 1172.

Thank you. If you're in support or opposition of AB 1172, you may press one and then zero.

Now is your time.

We'll go to line 25. Your line is open. With no respond, we'll move on. And there's no one else in queue.

Alright, we'll come back to Finance.

Finance is currently opposed to AB 1172. We know at a cost of $199,000 for three years from the Energy Resources Programs account. The Energy Resources Programs account is the California Energy Commission's primary operating fund and it is in a structural deficit.

Alright, we've taken comments from the public. We've taken comments from Finance. We have no questions. So without objection, AB 1172 will move to suspense. Moving on to AB 386, Nguyen, California Right to Financial Privacy Act. It's a suspense candidate. The authors waived presentation. We'll open up public comment right here in this room with support opportunities. No one wants to support. Anybody want to oppose? There's nobody here to oppose. Moderator will open up the phone line on AB 386.

Thank you. If you're in support of opposition of AB 386, you may press one and then zero. Mr. Chair, we have no one in queue.

No one in queue. Finance, do you have a file on 386?

No file.

No file on 386. Any questions? No questions. Without objection, 386 will move to the suspense file AB 391, Jones-Sawyer on child abuse and neglect, non-mandated reporters. It's a suspense candidate. The author's waive presentation. We'll open up public comment right here in room 2200 on 391. Seeing if anybody wants to speak in favor. And there's nobody who wants to speak in favor. Is anybody who would like to speak in opposition of this fine bill? Seeing no opposition. How about we go to the phone line, moderator, on 391?

Thank you. If you're in support of opposition of AB 391, you may press one and then zero. And we have no one in queue.

No one in queue. Any comments from Finance?

No file.

No file. No questions from my colleagues. Without objection, 391 will move to the suspense file. AB 425, Alvarez, Medi-Cal pharmacogenomic testing. Pharmacogenomic testing. It is a suspense candidate. The author has waived presentation. We'll open up the public comment on AB 425. Seeing no one speaking in support. Any opposition to AB 425? Seeing no opposition, we'll move to the phone line for support or opposition of 425.

Thank you. If you're in support or opposition of AB 425, you may press one and then zero. We do have one in the queue. One moment, please. We will go to line 34. Your line is open.

Hello, this is Kristi Foy on behalf of the California Clinical Laboratory Association, in strong support.

Thank you. And Mr. Chair, we have no further support or opposition in queue.

We've taken support and opposition of AB 425. We'll come to Finance.

No file.

No file. No questions from my colleagues. Without objection, 425 will move to suspense. AB 494, Arambula, Robert F. Kennedy Farm Worker Medical Plan. It is a suspense candidate. The author's waive presentation. We'll open up public comment right here in this room on AB 494. Seeing no one speak in favor. How about opposition to 494? Seeing no opposition. We'll go to the phone line for support or opposition of 494.

Thank you. If you're in support or opposition of AB 494, you may press one and then zero. And Mr. Chair, we have no one in the queue.

Alright, we'll come to Finance.

Finance currently has an opposed position on AB 494. We note a $1 million annual cost General Fund until 25-26. After that, $4 million annually out of the General Fund from 2026-27 to 30-31. In addition, we note a cost of 135,000 annually from DHCS from 25-26 through 30-31.

Alright, we've taken comments from Finance, and we have no questions from my colleagues. Without objection, 494 will move to suspense. AB 606, Mathis, California Endangered Species Act. It is a suspense candidate Mr. Micheli is at the microphone to support AB 606.

Yes, Mr. Chairman. For Humboldt and Mendocino Redwood Companies in support of the bill.

Thank you, but can you tell me the only team in the 80s to have two World Series championships? Only one, Mr. Bradford? The Dodgers. It was the Dodgers. See that? Any opposition to AB 606. Seeing no opposition, how about we go to the phone line for support or opposition to 606.

Thank you. If you're in support or opposition of AB 606, you may press one and then zero. And we have no one in queue. Mr. Chair.

Let's go to finance.

No file.

No file, no questions. Without objection, 606 will go to suspense. AB 620, Connolly, on healthcare coverage for metabolic disorders. It is suspense candidate. The Assembly Member's waive presentation. We'll open up the public hearing in this room with no one coming to the microphone. Mr. Micheli is moving about. We'll see if there's any opposition to AB 620. There's no opposition to AB 620. How about we go to the phone line for support or opposition to AB 620.

Thank you. If you're in support or opposition of AB 620, you may press one and then zero. And we have no one in queue. Mr. Chair.

No opposition. Is there a file on 620?

Finance is currently opposed to AB 620 as it creates cost pressures to the General Fund. While the Department of Managed Health Care did not have a finalized fiscal impact, according to the California Health Benefits Review Program, the bill would increase total annual expenditures by 26.9 million for employers, employees, and families enrolled in DMHC and CDI regulated policies. Additionally, it should be noted, premiums for CalPERS and Covered California plans would likely increase by 1.4 million and 4.3 million, respectively.

Alright, we've heard from Finance. Do we have any questions or comments? No. Without objection, 620, will go to suspense. AB 998, Connolly, biomass energy facilities. The Suspense candidate. And we do have a speaker in support.

Last one, Mr. Chair. Chris Micheli on behalf of Pioneer Community Energy, a community choice aggregator, in support of AB 998. Thank you.

I didn't give you a question. You see that? I have one. You want one? Nine. So in 1998, in the 9th month, what important Internet company was founded? 1998.

Google?

Google. You got it right. Look at that it. See that? Alright, let's see if there's opposition to 998. No opposition to 998. Let's go to the phone line. Any support or opposition.

If you're in support or opposition of AB 998, you may press one and then zero. And we have no one in queue at this time.

Alright, we'll come back to Finance on 998.

No file.

No file. We'll go to my colleagues. Seeing no questions or comments. Without objection, 998 will go to suspense. We'll move on to Assembly Member Irwin, AB 621. It is a suspense candidate. The authors waive presentation. And we'll open up the public hearing and see if anybody wants to speak about 621. There's nobody in support. Any opposition to 621? There's no opposition to 621. How about we go to the phone line and see if anybody wants to speak to us about AB 621?

Thank you, if you're in support of opposition of AB 621, you may press one and then zero. We will go down line 31. Your line is open.

Mr. Chairman, Members. Aaron Read, representing Cal Fire Local 2881, proud co sponsors of Jacqui Irwin's bill, 621.

Thank you. Mr. Chair, we have no further support or opposition in queue.

Alright, we'll come to Finance on 621.

Finance is currently opposed to AB 621. We note a potential cost of $25 million over the next two decades. In addition, we also note that CDCR estimates it will incur annual General Fund costs in the low millions of dollars if the bill is enacted.

Alright, any questions or comments from my colleagues? Seeing none. Without objection, AB 621 will move to suspense. AB 1002, Irwin, Taxation Earned Income Tax Credit. It is a suspense candidate. The author has waived presentation. We will open up the public comment right here in this room on 1002, seeing if there's any support. There is no support. Is there any opposition on AB 1002? There's no opposition. How about we go to the phone line to see if anybody wants to speak to us about AB 1002?

Thank you. If you're in support of opposition of AB 1002, you may press one and then zero. Mr. Chair, there is no one in queue.

No one in queue. How about we come to Finance on 1002?

Finance is currently opposed to AB 1002. We note that the Franchise Tax Board may incur ongoing General Fund costs of 609,000 in 23-24 to implement the bill's provisions. This increases to 7.2 million in 26-27 and moves to an ongoing cost of 4.1 million starting in 28-29.

Alright, any questions or comments from my colleagues? Seeing none. Without objection, AB 1002 will move to suspense. AB 1500, also by Assembly Member Irwin, on property taxation, application of base year value, disaster relief. It's an urgency measure. It is a suspense candidate. The authors waive presentation. We'll open up the public comment right here in this room on AB 1500. Seeing no one wishing to speak in support of 1500. How about opposition of 1500? Seeing no opposition, let's go to the phone line for AB 1500.

Thank you. If you're in support or opposition of AB 1500, you may press one and then zero. And Mr. Chair, we have no one in queue.

We have no one in queue. How about we come to Finance on 1500?

Finance does not have a formal position on the bill, but we would note that it could result in unquantifiable Prop 98 General Fund costs if we were to move out of test one.

Alright, any questions or comments from my colleagues? Seeing none. Without objection, AB 1500 moves to suspense. Mr. Wiener?

Yes.

This popular animatronic toy reached its peak in the mid 1980s and helped launched 1986 Nintendo Entertainment System

Transformers.

It's an animatronic toy, closely looked like a bear. Anybody know?

Teddy Ruxpin?

Teddy Ruxpin. There you go. Alright. AB 1637, Irwin, local government, internet, website, and email addresses. It is a suspense candidate. The author's waive presentation. We'll open up the public comment right here in this room on AB 1637 with nobody coming to the microphone. How about... Oh, are you coming to support or are you coming to oppose? Let's see. No support. How about opposition on 1637?

Thank you, Chair and Members. Damon Conklin with the League of California Cities and also on behalf of CSAC of counties respectfully oppose.

Alright, before you go. 1980s, Clint Eastwood movie, Mario Van Peebles, war movie.

Heartbreak Ridge.

Heartbreak Ridge. There you go. See that? Somebody who was around in the 1980s. Moving on. So we have opposition to 1637. How about we go to the phone line. He dropped the mic. Look at that. He got his question and dropped the mic. Phone line on 1637.

Thank you. If you're in support of opposition on AB 1637, you may press one and then zero. We'll go to 11. Your line is open.

Good afternoon. Alyssa Silhi on behalf of the City Clerks Association of California, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the City of Redwood City, and the City of Santa Rosa, respectfully in opposition. Thank you.

Thank you. And one moment for our next question. 39, your line is open.

Good morning. Kalyn Dean with the California State Association of Counties, CSAC, in opposition to AB 1637. Thank you.

Thank you. And Mr. Chair, we have no further support or opposition in queue.

Alright. We've taken our support in opposition of 1637. We'll come back to finance.

No file.

No file. No questions from my colleagues. Without objection, AB 1637 will move to suspense. AB 633, Patterson, Nursing Licensure, Retired Licenses. It is a suspense candidate. The authors waive presentation. We'll open up public comment in this room on 633. Seeing no one come to speak in favor, how about opposition of 663? Excuse me, 633. There's no opposition of 633. Let's go to the phone line to see if anybody wants to speak in favor or oppose 633.

Thank you. If you're in support or opposition of AB 633, you may press one and then zero. Mr. Chair, we have no one in queue.

No one in queue. Finance, you have something to tell us on 633?

I do. Finance is neutral on the bill. We estimate it will cost one time absorbable cost of $14,000 to the Board of Registered Nursing Fund. And we do not anticipate that the bill would create a state reimbursable mandate.

Alright, we've taken comments, we've talked to Finance, and we have no questions. So without objection, 633 will move to suspense. AB 715, Dahle, on rural education task force. It is a suspense candidate. The author's waive presentation. We'll open up public comment right here in this room on AB 715. We see no one coming to the microphone to speak in favor. How about opposition to 715? Seeing no opposition, we will move to the phone line for support or opposition.

If you're in support or opposition of AB 715. You may press one and then zero. And we have no one in the queue.

Alright, Finance, do you want to tell us about 715?

Finance is currently opposed to AB 715. We note ongoing nonproposition 98 General Fund costs is $70,000 for staff to implement and administer the task force and reimburse travel costs for the Members. In addition, General Fund costs could increase to the extent that a definition for a very rural area is not currently defined at the state or federal level.

Alright, seeing no questions or comments from my colleagues, AB 715 will move to suspense. AB 776, Holden, on the routes 210. It's a suspense candidate, the author's waive presentation. We'll open up public comment on this bill to see if anybody wants to speak in support. Any support, any opposition? Moderator, anybody on the phone line wishing to talk about AB 776.

If you are in support or opposition of AB 776, you may press one and then zero. Mr. Chair, we have no one in queue.

No one in queue. Finance, do you want to tell us about seven, 76?

No file.

No file. No questions. Without objection, 776 will move to suspense. AB 789, Berman, student financial aid Cal Grants. It's a suspense candidate, the author's waive presentation. We'll open up public comment right here in this room on 789. Seeing no one come to speak in support, how about opposition of 789? Seeing no opposition, how about we go to the phone line on 789?

Thank you. If you're in support or opposition of AB 789, you may press one and then zero. We will go to line 32. Your line is open. Line 32. Your line is open. Do you have us on mute?

Can you hear me?

Hello. Anna Mathews with the Faculty Association of the California Community Colleges, in support. Thank you.

We can.

Thank you. We have no further support or opposition in queue.

No further support. How about finance?

No file.

No file? How about questions? No questions. Without objection, SB 789 will move to the suspense file. AB... Excuse me. I said SB. It's AB 789. AB 867, Friedman on foster youth. It is a suspense candidate. The authors waive presentation. We'll open up public comment in this room, seeing if anybody wants to speak in support. Anybody want to speak in opposition? Seeing no support or opposition, we'll go to the phone line for support or opposition of AB 867.

If you're in support or opposition of AB 867, you may press one and then zero. And, Mr. Chair, we have no one in queue.

No one in queue. How about finance?

Finance is currently opposed to AB 867. We note it has potential significant General Fund impacts not included in the 2023-24 Budget Act. The Department of Social Services indicates it costs totaling $173,000 General Fund in 24-25 and $169,000 annually thereafter, including one permanent position to update to implement the new program requirements. In addition, the state would incur one time General Fund automation costs in the hundreds of thousands of dollars to update the Child Welfare Services and the California Automated Response and Engagement System.

Lastly, it would result in unknown ongoing local assistance General Fund costs potentially in the tens of millions of dollars, depending on how often the court determines a child welfare agency has failed to comply with the statutory requirements.

Alright, we've heard from Finance. Any questions from my colleagues? Seeing none. Without objection, AB 867 will move to suspense. AB 888, Cervantes, student financial aid, immigrant seeking asylum. It's a suspense candidate. The author's waive presentation. We'll open up the public comment right here in this room. Seeing no one wishing to speak in support. How about opposition to 888? There is no opposition. Moderator, is there anyone on the phone line who wants to speak to us about 888?

Thank you. If you're in support of opposition of AB 888, you may press one and then zero. Mr. Chair, we have no one in queue.

No one in queue on 888. Finance.

Finance is currently opposed to AB 888. We note that there's unknown but significant ongoing General Fund cost pressures. The Student Aid Commission indicates that these are associated with the increase in Cal Grant awards, but does note a minor and absorbable cost for workload.

Alright, we've heard from Finance. Let's go to our colleagues. No questions or comments. Without objection, 888 will move to suspense. AB 907, Lowenthal, coverage for PANDAS and PANS. It is a suspense candidate. The authors waive presentation. We'll open up the public comment right here in this room on 907. With any support. Seeing no one coming to support the bill, how about opposition? Seeing no opposition, we'll go to the phone line to see if there's anyone wishing to support or oppose 907.

Thank you. If you're in support or opposition of AB 907, you may press one and then zero. And we do have a few queuing up. One moment for their line numbers. We will go to line 43. Your line is open.

Hi. This is Dr. Tempe Chen from Miller Children's Hospital in Long Beach at the MemorialCare Health System. I'm a pediatric infectious disease physician and one of the only treating physicians for PANS and PANDAS in my area, and I support AB 907. Thank you.

And Doctor, you have one of my favorite first names. My favorite aunt, Genevieve was blind from birth and lived into her 80s. And her name was Genevieve. She used to babysit us, and she was totally blind. Thank you for being here.

Thank you. We'll go to line 20... 27. Your line is open.

Good morning. My name is Angela Tang. I'm the mother of a PANS child and a physician. I'm supporting AB 907 to save California special ed and parental unemployment costs. Thank you.

Thank you. Line 18, your line is open.

Hi. My name is April Ronay. I'm a second grade teacher, and I wholeheartedly support AB 907 for my son Aidan and all children affected by PANS PANDAS. Thank you.

Thank you. Line 36, your line is open.

Good morning. My name is Suzanne Gushansky, and I have two children with PANS PANDAS. One was approved for treatment, and one was denied for treatment, and I strongly support AB 907. Thank you.

Line 35, your line is open.

Hi, this is Elaine Castillion, LA County. I'm a registered nurse, friend and coworker of someone whose son has pans, and I'm in support.

Thank you. Line 33. Your line is open.

Hi. My name is Sherry Strollson. I'm a teacher and also the mom of a child with PANS and PANDAS. And I strongly support AB 907.

Thank you. Line 37. Your line is open.

Hi, my name is Sandy Yokes and my nephew has pans and was saved by IVIG. I am in support of AB 907.

Thank you. Line 41 your line is open.

Hi, my name is Ashley Zakala, and my nine year old daughter has pans, and I'm strongly in favor of AB 907. Thank you.

Thank you. Line 30. Your line is open. Line 30. Do you have us on mute?

Yes, we can.

Thanks. My name is Lendri Purcell. I'm a former special ed teacher. My son Bodhi Greenwald has Pandas and he's 13. I'm in strong support.

Thank you. And Mr. Chair, we have no further support or opposition in queue.

Thank you all for coming and sharing your perspective. We'll come to finance.

Finance is currently opposed to AB 907. We note that Department of Managed Healthcare estimates fiscal impact of the Bill to be $157,000 in 23/24, $990,000 and three positions in 24 25 and $1.14 in three positions in 25 26 and ongoing for the Administration. We are opposed, as it does create new cost pressures to the managed care Fund, which were not included in 2324 budget plan.

All right, we've heard from finance, we've heard from activists, and we have no questions from my colleagues. So, without objection, AB 907 will move to suspense. AB 1524 Lowenthal postsecondary education on campus, access to drug testing devices and anti tampering devices. It is a suspense candidate. The author's wave presentation will open up the public hearing to see if anybody wants to speak in support of 1524. Seeing no support, how about opposition of 1524? Seeing no opposition, how about we go to the phone lines for support or opposition of 1524?

Thank you for your support or opposition of AB 1524. You may press one and then zero we will go to line 32.

Hello, Anna Matthews with the Faculty Association of the California Community Colleges in strong support. Thank you.

Thank you. And Mr. Chair, we have no further support or opposition in queue.

All right, we've taken support and opposition for 1524. Do we have a file?

No file.

No file. Do we have any questions or comments? Seeing none. No questions or comments. So, without objection, 1524, we'll move to suspense. Senator Wahab, if you wanted to type a flawless document in the 1980s, which Windows word processor would you use?

Is this multi choice? You got some options? For me?

It was the competitor to Microsoft Word. Perfect. See, I gave you a hint and you got it. All right, moving on to AB nine. 72. Manshine local assistant. We're still on 80s trivia. So that's why we have not moved off yet. Yes, Ms.. Ashby is lobbying me to move on to the 90s. They come after the know. All right. AB 972, Maienschein local assistance and grant program streamlining workgroup. It's a suspense candidate.

The author's waive presentation will open up the public hearing in this room on AB 972. We have no supporters any opposition to 972. We have no supporters or opposition in this room, moderators or anyone on the phone line who would like to support or oppose AB 972.

Thank you. For support of opposition of AB 972, you may press one and then zero. Mr. Chair, we have no one in queue.

No one in queue. How about finance?

No file.

No file. No objections. Without objection, AB 972 will move to suspense AB 1145, also by Maienschein on workers compensation. It's a suspense candidate. We have movement in the gallery. How about coming to share your support position on AB 1145?

Thank you, Mr. Chair and Senators, Coby Pizzotti with California Association of Psychiatric Technicians. We're the proud sponsors of AB 1145. Just to underscore a few points, we have about 3600 Members working in the Department of State hospitals. Last year alone, there was 2700 assaults on staff. However, this Bill originated out of the Department of Corrections, where one of our nurses was doing rounds and discovered a brutal slaying in one of the cells. The inmate had decapitated and dissected his cellmate.

The nurse had to report once she discovered this to a correctional officer. The correctional officer had a PTSD presumption. Our nurse did not. It took her 18 months to get treatment and get her workers compensation claim approved. His was approved immediately because he had the presumption. I know this is primarily reserved for peace officers, but it is imperative that we treat our nursing staff who work side by side with peace officers the same. So without, we support. Thank you.

Thank you, sir. All right, any other support? Any opposition to 1145? Seeing no opposition, moderator, please queue up. Anyone who would like to support or oppose 1145, thank you.

For in support or opposition of AB 1145, you may press one and then zero. Mr. Chair, we have no one in queue.

All right, we'll come back to Finance on 1145.

Finance currently has an opposed position on AB 1145. We note that the Bill could have unknown fiscal impact and the impacted department's report employing over 15,000 individuals in three bargaining units that would be covered by the Bill. Assuming 20 individuals file approved PTSD workers comp claims in the bill's first year, and assuming a $50,000 in total industrial disability leave and medical expenses for each claim, the General Fund cost for the claims filed in the first year could be at least $1.0 million.

All right, we've heard from Finance. Any questions from my colleagues, seeing none, without objection, 1145 will move to suspense. Moving on to AB 1007 by Ortega Occupational Safety and Health Standards. It is a suspense candidate. The author's waive presentation will open up public comment right here in this room. Seeing no one come to the microphone in support, how about opposition to AB 1007? Seeing no opposition, we'll go to the phone line for support or opposition of AB 1007.

Thank you. If you're in support or opposition of AB 1007, you may press one and then zero. Mr. Chair, we have no one in queue.

We have no one in queue. Finance, do you want to speak about 1007?

Finance is currently opposed. AB 1007. We note that the Bill would result in the Occupational Safety and Health Fund costs of approximately 332,000 in the first year, 280, 81,000 each subsequent year that the rulemaking is undertaken. The Bill may also result in additional Cal OSHA enforcement costs once the regulations are in place. However, an estimate of those enforcement costs are currently unknown.

We've heard from Finance. Do we have any questions? Seeing no questions, without objection, AB 1007 will move to suspense. AB 1060 Orteg on healthcare coverage on Narcan. It is a suspense candidate. The author has waived presentation. We'll open up the public hearing to take support or support of 1060. Seeing no one come to the microphone. How about opposition of 1060? Seeing no one opposed, how about we go to the phone line and we see if there's anyone who wants to speak about AB 1060.

Thank you for your support of opposition of AB 1060. You may press one and then zero. Mr. Chair, we do have one queuing up. One moment, please. All right, we'll go to line 49. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Your line is open. With no response, we'll move on and we have no further support in opposition.

All right, we'll come to Finance on 1060.

Finance is currently opposed to AB 1060. We estimate it would require one permanent position and $147,000 out of the Managed Care Fund in 23, 24 and four permanent positions, and 705,000 out of the Managed Care Fund in 24 25 for permanent positions and 671,000 out of the Managed Care Fund in 2526 and annually thereafter for the additional workload associated.

In addition, we note that they're likely result in costs for the Department of Healthcare Services between the Low millions of dollars and Low tens of millions of dollars.

All right, we've heard from Finance. There's no questions from my colleagues. Without objection, 1060 will go to suspense. AB 1048 wix on dental benefits and rate review. It's a suspense candidate. The author's wave presentation will open up public comment right here in this room on 1048, seeing no one come to the are you coming to support?

Yes, sir.

All right, come on up. Are you ready for a trivia question? I am. Well, go first. Do your testimony first.

Good morning, Chair. And Members. D'Artagnan Byrd Ask Me California in support.

All right, D'Artagnan since we were on sort of outdated operating systems, this spreadsheet system premiered in January of 1983 and it was actually the first computer software to advertise on television. It no longer exists.

Oh, it no longer exists.

How about Lotus 123.

I would have no idea about that.

It was the first advertise on television. How about that? Maybe that's what was undoing. I don't know. Yeah.

I'm an 88, baby.

There you go. Five years before you were born. All right, anyone else in support of AB 1048? No one else? How about opposition to 1048 Lotus 123?

I've never heard of it in my life.

See that? How about we go to the phone line for support or opposition of AB 1048?

Thank you. For in support or opposition of AB 1048, you may press one and then zero. And Mr. Chair, we have no one in queue.

No one in queue will come to Finance.

Finance is currently opposed to AB 1048. We note costs out of the Department of Managed Health Care out of the Managed Care Fund of $429,000 and two positions in 23 24 $1.388 1.0 million and 3 positions in 24 25 1.36 3,000,003 positions in 25 26. In addition, we also note costs of the California Department of Insurance's insurance Fund of 297,023 24 832,024, 25 496,025 26 and 261,026 27. And ongoing all right, we've taken support and opposition.

We've heard from Finance. We have no questions from my colleagues. Without objection, 1048 moved to suspense. AB 1116.

Yes, sorry.

All right, we're going to AB 1106 Soria on PK-three. Early childhood education specialist credential. It is a suspense candidate, the author's waive presentation. We'll open up the public comment right here in this room on 1106, seeing if anybody wants to speak in support. There's no support, is there? Opposition of 1106? There's no opposition of 1106. Moderators anyone on the phone line that wants to speak about 1106?

Thank you for your support or opposition of AB 1106. You may press one and then zero. We will go to line 14. Your line is open.

Good morning, chair Members. Sam Nasher with the Los Angeles County Office of Education in support.

Thank you. And Mr. Chair, we have no further support or opposition in queue.

All right, we've taken support and opposition. We'll come to finance.

Finance is currently opposed to AB 1106. We note that it creates cost pressures and several millions of dollars to tens of $1.0 million one time Non Proposition 98 General Fund for the Commission on Teacher Credentialing to administer the grant program. We would also note that the Commission estimates the costs of this would result in $164,000 Non Proposition 98 General Fund and one position for the life of the grant and for the data reporting requirements.

All right, any questions or comments from my colleagues without objection. AB 1106. We'll move to suspense. AB 1123 Addis California State University employees paid parental leave. It's a suspense candidate. The author's way presentation will open up the public comment right here in this room on 1123. No one coming to the microphone in support. How about opposition for 1123? Seeing no opposition for 1123, we'll go to the phone line. For support or opposition of 1123.

Thank you. For in support or opposition of AB 1123, you may press one and then 0 and 1 moment. We do have one queuing up. We'll go to line 44. Your line is open.

Good morning, Mr. Chair Members. This is Ron Rapp speaking on behalf of the California Faculty Association. We're proud sponsors of AB 1123. We believe that this Bill provides much needed support for CSU employees and their families. We also believe that the cost estimates are greatly exaggerated and easily absorbable. Thank you.

Thank you. And Mr. Chair, we have no further support or opposition in queue.

All right, we've taken support and opposition 1123. How about we go to Finance?

Finance is currently opposed to AB 1123. We note that we estimate the Bill would result in ongoing General Fund cost pressures of approximately 21.9 million above the cost of CSU's current parental leave policy. Based on the current usage rate for faculty and staff, we believe the cost pressures are there are significant ongoing excuse me, General Fund cost pressures that are created outside of the administration's fiscal plan. And we are concerned it would interfere with and or influence the CSU's collective bargaining process.

All right, seeing no questions or comments from my colleague, 1123, we'll move to suspense. Maybe 1150 Water Parks and Wildlife Committee Bill. It is an omnibus Bill and it is a suspense candidate. We'll open up the public comment right here in this room for support or opposition of 1150. Seeing none. Any opposition? Seeing none. Moderator any opposition or support to 1150.

Mr. Chair, are we on AB 1150?

I'm sorry. I turned the page prematurely. Look at that. AB 1150. I messed up. Moderator.

That's okay. If you're in support or opposition of AB 1150, you may press one and then zero, and we have no one in the queue. Thank you.

Moderator do you know what the first Acapella song to make Billboards 100 was?

I do not.

Don't worry. Be happy. Who knew that? Anyone know that? Don't worry.

Literally, no one.

Be happy. No one remembers that song? Yeah, see, that was the first Acapella song to bank Billboards 100. All right, 1150. Finance.

Finance is currently opposed to AB 1150. We would note that while it results in unknown but non negligible decrease in the revenue to the State Parks and Recreation Fund, the State Parks and Recreation Fund is in a structural deficit and is at risk of potential insolvency in coming years. Therefore, the Fund cannot absorb proposals that will decrease its revenue at this time.

All right, we've heard from Finance. We had a mess up from the Chair. But without objection, AB 1150 will move to suspense. Now, I will turn the page and go on to AB 1178 by Luz Rivas on school nutrition guardian Meal Reimbursement It's a suspense candidate. The author's waive presentation will open up the public comment right here in this room for support of 1178. Seeing no support, how about opposition of 1178? Seeing no opposition, how about we go to the phone line for 1178?

Thank you. For in support of opposition of AB 1178, you may press one and then zero. And we have no one in queue.

All right, we've taken support and opposition. We'll come to finance.

Finance is currently opposed to AB 1178. We would note ongoing Proposition 98 General Fund costs in the Low hundreds of millions of dollars to reimburse meals served to guardians of qualified pupils. In addition, the Department of Education estimates nonproposition 98 General Fund costs for information, technology and staffing of 2.84 million in 23 24, 1.376 million in 24 25 and 1.329 million in 25 26 and ongoing to implement the Bill.

All right, any questions or comments from my colleagues? Seeing none, without objection, 1178 will move to suspense, maybe 1272. Wood State Water Resources Control Board. It is a suspense candidate. The author's waive presentation will open up the public comment right here in this room. Seeing no one come to the microphone in support, how about opposition to 1272? Seeing no opposition, how about we go to the phone line for support or opposition of AB 1272? Moderator thank you.

If you're in support or opposition of AB 1272, you may press one and then zero. Mr. Chair, we have no one in queue.

All right, we've taken support and opposition. Finance?

No file.

No file. We have no file. So without objection, 1272 will go to suspense. You know what? I'm going to open up the roll on ACA Five. Let's call the roll.

ACA Five, the motion is do pass to the Senate Floor. Chair voting aye. Senator Jones. Senator Wahab aye. Senator Weiner aye.

Is Mr. Jones coming? All right, we'll keep that open all right, we'll keep it open for one more opportunity. So ACA five stays on call. We'll move on to AB 1297 Quirk-Silva public restrooms. It is a suspense candidate. The author's waive presentation will open up public hearing. Steve anybody wants to speak in support of 1297? Seeing nobody speaking in support, how about opposition of 1297? No opposition. How about we go to the phone line for support or opposition of 1297?

Thank you. For support or opposition of AB 1297, you may press one and then zeroton. And we have no one in queue Mr. Chair.

No one in queue on 1297.

Finance finance currently opposes AB 1297. We anticipate that the Bill local government reporting requirement would create potentially a significant state reimbursable mandate. Assuming a cost of $1,000 for each of the 58 counties, 482 cities, and approximately 3000 special districts to provide the necessary information, the General Fund cost exposure would be over $3.5 million. In addition, California Department of Health reports it would incur $3.6 million in one time General Fund costs and over $760,000 in annual General Fund costs to administer the bill's provisions.

All right, we've taken finances comments. Seeing no questions from my colleagues, without objection, 1297, we'll move to suspense. AB 1470 Quirk-Silva, Medical, Behavioral, Health Services the Suspense candidate author's waive presentation will open up public comment to see if anybody wants to speak in favor or support of 1470. Seeing no one come to the microphone, either support or opposed, how about moderator let's go to the phone line for 1470.

Thank you. For supporter opposition of AB 1470, you may press one and then zero. Mr. Chair, we have no one in queue at this time.

No one in queue. How about we come back to Finance on 1470?

Finance currently opposes AB 1470. We note that it would likely result in ongoing Proposition 30 state mandated costs, likely ongoing General Fund costs between the Low millions and Low tens of millions of dollars to develop, train, and require counties to use the standard forms.

All right, seeing no questions or comments from my colleagues, AB 1470 moves to suspense. AB 1334 Pellerin Mobile Home Parks it's a suspense candidate, authors waive presentation will open up public comment right here in this room on 1334. Seeing no one come to speak in favor, how about opposition to 1334? Seeing no opposition moderator anyone on the phone line wishing to support or oppose AB 1334.

Thank you. For in support or opposition of AB 1334, you may press one and then zero. We will go to line 24. Your line is open.

Good morning, Mr. Chair. Chris Wysocki, on behalf of Western Manufactured Housing Communities Association in support.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. We have no further support or opposition in queue.

No further support, opposition. How about we go to the Finance on 1334?

Finance is currently opposed to AB 1334. We would note it results in an estimated annual cost of $179,000 General Fund and one position for the Department of Housing and Community Development.

All right, we've heard from Finance. We have no questions or comments from my colleagues. Without objection, 1334 will move to suspense. AB 1517. Gallagher special education. It's a suspense, candidate. The author's waive presentation. We'll open up public comment right here in this room to see if anybody wants to speak about 1517. Seeing none, we will go to opposition. We have no opposition. How about we go to Finance? Excuse me. We go to the phone lines for support or opposition of 1517.

Thank you. For in support of AB 1517, you may press one and then zero. And we have no one in queue. Mr. Chair.

No support or opposition. How about we go to Finance?

No file.

No file. No questions. Without objection, 1517 will move to suspense. AB 1543, Assembly Member Fong on community colleges. It is a suspense candidate. The author's waive presentation, will open up public comment right here in this room on 1543. Seeing no one here to speak in support, how about opposition? There's no opposition. How about we go to the phone line for support or opposition of AB 1543.

Thank you. For in support or opposition of AB 1543, you may press one and then zero. We do have line 32. Your line is open.

Hello. Anna Matthews with the Faculty Association of the California Community Colleges in strong support. Thank you.

Thank you. And we have no further support or opposition in queue.

All right, we've taken support and opposition of 1543. Is there a file?

No file.

No file. No questions. Without objection, 1543 will go to suspense. Moving on to our final Bill, AB 1677. Mckinnor public employment. Employment, salary classification. It's a suspense candidate. The author has waived presentation, and we will open up the public comment to see if anybody wants to support 1677. Seeing no support, how about opposition of 1677? Seeing no opposition, how about we go to the phone line for support or opposition of 1677?

Thank you. If you're in support or opposition of AB 1677, you may press one and then zero. Mr. Chair, we have no one in queue.

No one in queue. Do we have a file on our final Bill?

Yes. Finance has an opposed position on AB 1677. We would note that it results in a one time cost of $150,000 to the Berkeley Labor Center in 23 24 to undertake the study required by the Bill. This also may result in unknown, but potentially significant costs to the state.

If the study required by this Bill recommends a salary increase for bu 10 Members illustrative purposes based upon prior union requests for General salary increases, finance estimates this Bill would cost between 42.5 million and 365.5 million, of which 10.6 million to 91.4 million would be General Fund ongoing.

All right, we've heard from Finance. Seeing no questions from my colleagues, without objection, AB 1677 will move to suspense. We will stay open for another five minutes to see if Mr. Jones can make it, so we will temporarily is he coming or not?

He texted me? zero, he just did. Literally just texted me. Let's see. What did he say? Okay, so we're just going to close the roll on ACA five, right? You can open the roll and then we'll close the roll.

ACA five. The motion is do pass to the Senate Floor. Chair voting aye. Senator Jones.

That Bill is out, five to zero. That concludes our business. If you want to participate, please feel free to send in your comments through our website. We will be back after break with the rest of our bills. So thank you all for being here and appreciate it. Thank you, staff. Everybody have a great break. And this meeting is adjourned.