Hearings

Senate Standing Committee on Education

July 16, 2025
  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    The Senate Education Committee will come to order in 30 seconds. Good morning. There are 10 bills on today's agenda. Three bills are on consent. Those bills are item number two, AB279, item number nine, AB977 and item number 10, AJR7.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Witnesses are asked to limit their testimony to two minutes to ensure the Committee is able to complete today's agenda in a timely fashion. Seeing that we do not have a quorum, we'll begin as a Subcommitee with the first Bill. And I see that we have AB84 first on the agenda.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Welcome Assemblymember Marsucci, and you may begin when you're ready. And just as an FYI for this Bill, we're going to be doing MeToos together just because I know we have a lot of folks here that would like to participate. So we'll do first support witnesses and opposition witnesses.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Then we'll do all of our me toos at time the same, same time.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Thank you very much, Madam Chair and Senators, I'm here to present Assembly Bill 84.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    And before I go any further, I want to thank Mr. Johnson with your Committee staff for all of his work in our ongoing negotiations on this Bill to address the concerns being raised by all parties, including the many parents that we have all been hearing from. And I accept the Committee amendments.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    These Committee amendments are on top of the substantial amendments that we have already taken in the Assembly to address again many of the concerns being raised by stakeholders and that effort is ongoing. I present Assembly Bill 84 to strengthen charter school oversight and accountability.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    To crack down on the documented cases of charter schools, especially the non classroom based charter schools, engaging in fraud and abuse of taxpayer dollars to enrich bad actor charter school operators. Again, let me first acknowledge what I have heard from many of you Senators.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    I've had individual conversations as well as conversations throughout this legislative process as well as my many meetings with charter school parents which is that there are good charter schools that provide choice for students and parents in many communities throughout our state to meet their unique educational needs. I have personally visited many good charter schools.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    In fact, on Monday I just met with an excellent non classroom based charter program in my community in Los Angeles, the DA Vinci Schools. And I completely respect the desire of students and parents who want to pursue the best educational opportunities available to them.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Unfortunately, in recent years we have seen a series of high profile cases involving bad actor charter school operators who have figured out how to enrich themselves by taking advantage of lax charter school oversight.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    In 2021, the operators of the A3 charter schools based in San Diego County were criminally convicted and sentenced to prison for defrauding California taxpayers of over $400 million of good K12 public education dollars.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    In May of 2025 of this year, the San Diego Union Tribune reported that the Elite Academy charter schools, which serves just around 1800 mostly homeschool students, have been paying millions of dollars a year to a related corporation created by Elite Academy's founder where the corporation's sole source of revenue are the Elite Charter school's attendance based revenues and with the corporation employing family Members with salaries in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    And just two weeks ago the State Auditor issued their audit where they found that the locally based Highlands Community Charter Schools after whistleblowers reported to the local ABC News that the charter school operators were engaging in attendance fraud, in fact confirmed the reports of over $180 million again in public taxpayer education dollars being inappropriately collected by the Highlands Community Charter school.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Following the A3 charter scandal, the state imposed a moratorium on so called non classroom based charters and tasked the Legislative Analyst Office and the Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team or fcmat, which you will hear from Mike Fine, the Executive Director of fcmat, the State school fiscal oversight Agency, to make recommendations on strengthening charter school oversight.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    The State Controller coming out of the criminal case in San Diego also convened a task force to make recommendations for the same objective. This Bill seeks to codify the recommendations made by the Lao FCMAT and the State Comptroller's Office.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    I want to again thank your staff Madam Chair's excellent work and in particular their his excellent Committee analysis on this Bill. And I with your permission, I'd like to read just a short section of the staff report available to all of you on page nine of the staff report.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    In the middle of the page the report states this Bill, Assembly Bill 84 emerged in response to long standing oversight concerns and notable fraud cases, not from an effort to limit educational options in cases like A3 and Highlands. Weaknesses in data systems, fiscal reporting oversight structures enabled large scale misuse of public funds.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    To address these concerns, state agencies, referring to the LAO FCMAT and the State Controllers Task Force, develop recommendations aimed at improving transparency, accountability and operational safeguards in the non classroom based space. Clearly we have a problem here. We need to strengthen charter school oversight and accountability and I'd like to ask to testify in support of this measure.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Mike Fine representing the Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team and Cassie Mancini from the California School Employees Association in support of the Bill.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    Good morning Chair and Members of the Committee As the Assembly Member indicated I might finan the Chief Executive Officer of the state's Fiscal Crisis and management assistance team. FCMAT's interest is to enhance and strengthen the audit statutes and procedures, to build parity among local educational agencies, and to strengthen the authorization and balanced oversight of charter schools.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    At the Legislature's request, FCMAT partnered with the LAO to research and prepare our joint February of 2024 report on non classroom based charters. The themes raised in that report are included in AB84, including a number of the recommendations. FCMAT was also an active Member of the Court Ordered Comptrollers Multi Agency Task Force on Charter School Audits.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    The themes and many recommendations from the task force are also included in this Bill. It's important to note that we have outstanding charter schools, as the Assembly Members already indicated.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    In California, the headlines of fraud and wrongdoing are limited to only a handful of organizations, but as the Assembly Members just outlined, those have they continue even up into the last several weeks and they are growing in dollar amount. This, however, is not dissimilar to traditional school districts. We have struggles with some of them as well.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    Today, charter school audits are governed in large part by what the charter school petition says. Addressing an annual independent audit is a required element for a charter school petition. Most, but not all petitions refer to the standard audit statute for K12 school districts. Existing statute, however, does not consistently or adequately address charter schools.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    It was crafted before the Charter Schools act and and is written specifically for school districts. AB84 does several things. It modifies existing statute on audits to explicitly apply to charter schools, creating parity in the requirements and process for all LEAs on this important topic.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    It makes numerous improvements in the requirements for Auditor training, Auditor Oversight, Audit Guide contents for all LEAs.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    These improvements are consistent with the February 24 Lao FCMAT report and the Controllers Task Force provides other comprehensive reforms around non classroom based charter schools and charter schools in General, many consistent with the LAO FCMAT recommendations and as the author has indicated, consistent with concerns that have been raised over many, many years, actually several decades on some of these topics.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    It also addresses, as I've just indicated, many practices and policies that have been expressed by oversight agencies and that I'm available to answer any questions you may have.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Cassie Mancini

    Person

    Good Morning Madam Chair and Senators Cassie Mancini here on behalf of the California School Employees Association, co sponsors of AB84. First, I really want to appreciate the hard work of Committee staff in joining our twice weekly negotiations to work through the issues raised in AB84 and SB414.

  • Cassie Mancini

    Person

    These negotiations are ongoing and will continue to work in good faith throughout summer recess to find common ground. Two recent charter scandals inform our intent here. In 2019, nonprofit charter management organization A3 Education defrauded the public of $400 million.

  • Cassie Mancini

    Person

    And just last month the State Auditor released their report on Highlands Charter which found that over just two years, Highland's disregarded state law to wrongfully receive over $180 million in Prop 98 funds.

  • Cassie Mancini

    Person

    These cases clearly demonstrate for us how California's existing system of non classroom based charter oversight carried out by district authorizers, annual financial audits and the State Board of education through its NCB funding determination process is entirely inadequate. AB84 seeks to strengthen our oversight systems by enacting the policy recommendations issued by experts.

  • Cassie Mancini

    Person

    The Bill has undergone significant amendments in the spirit of compromise, so I'll briefly summarize what it does today. First, as Mike discussed, the Bill Standardizes audit procedures. Secondly, the Bill enacts limits on small district authorizers that do not have the capacity to effectively oversee large non classroom based charters.

  • Cassie Mancini

    Person

    The Highlands audit has underscored for us the need for greater accountability on the part of charter authorizers of all sizes to conduct more thorough oversight that is not solely reliant based upon a charter school's annual audit or a charter school's assertions.

  • Cassie Mancini

    Person

    And as we continue to work on the Bill, we hope to bring the Legislature proposal to hold all authorizers accountable for conducting high quality oversight. Finally, the Bill maintains the existing funding determination process for non classroom based schools with recommended enhancements. AB84 ensures that a school's spending on educators and instruction is annually monitored and verifiable.

  • Cassie Mancini

    Person

    It also creates a definition of a virtual charter network and requires network schools to apply for a funding determination to concurrently to prevent the manipulation of expenditure data. AB84 will not cut funding to any charter school. It's a big Bill and because.

  • Cassie Mancini

    Person

    But that's because we need structural reform to detect and prevent future fraud cases and ensure that our public education system operates with integrity. For these reasons, we respectfully request an aye vote. Thank you.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Thank you for your presentation. As I mentioned before, we're going to do MeToos altogether. So I'm going to move now to lead witnesses and in opposition. If two lead witnesses can come forward and use the mics here. zero, apologies. And let's go ahead and establish a quorum while you all are getting seated.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Assistant, if you can call the roll Senators.

  • Juliana Hubbell

    Person

    Perez Here. Perez Here. Ochobog. Here.

  • Juliana Hubbell

    Person

    Ochobog Here. Cabaldin Choi. Here.

  • Juliana Hubbell

    Person

    Choi. Here. Cortese. Gonzalez. Gonzalez. Here. Laird.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Thank you. We'll now turn it over to you both whenever you would like to get started.

  • Mary Cox

    Person

    Good morning. I'm Mary Cox, Superintendent of Cor Butte Charter, a Tk12 flex based charter in Butte County funded as a non classroom based charter. Over half of our students are socioeconomically disadvantaged and more than 17% receive special education.

  • Mary Cox

    Person

    We're a safe haven for all students, including LGBTQ youth, students facing mental health challenges, bullying, and those in credit recovery. We were devastated by the 2018 campfire. More than half of our students became homeless overnight. Butte County has the highest percentage of students in the state with four or more adverse childhood experiences.

  • Mary Cox

    Person

    We've invested in clinician led wellness programs not because we require to, but because our students need it. If AB84 passes, we'll be forced to absorb major new administrative costs putting these essential services at risk for our students. AB84 imposes costly unfunded mandates, including 10 new audit reports every year and potential authorizer changes. I experienced that under 1507.

  • Mary Cox

    Person

    It was disruptive, expensive, and pulled focus away from students. Unlike districts, charter schools are not eligible to apply for additional mandated cost reimbursement. Where is the funding to pay for this? It's simply unfair.

  • Mary Cox

    Person

    Section 43 of the Bill would prohibit us from using funds for enrichment provided by community partners, even when aligned with academic goals and overseen by credentialed teachers. This provision will cut off access to important student enrichment, like high impact tutoring for students with dyslexia or learning about local ecology from indigenous community Members, including.

  • Mary Cox

    Person

    In contrast, school districts can use extended learning opportunity funds for similar programs with non credentialed partners. We aren't offering things school districts don't provide elsewhere. Yet under AB84, we'd have different rules and our students would have less access to educational opportunity that's inequitable and harmful to our students.

  • Mary Cox

    Person

    Finally, AB84 would classify my school as a virtual school because less than 20% of instruction happens in person. That label doesn't fit. I have $11 million invested in facilities that are used daily. Some students are on campus four days a week. Others only come to meet with their teacher or for special education services.

  • Mary Cox

    Person

    Our school is flexible by design to meet the unique needs of our students and parents. We support strong oversight. But AB84 places unfair unfunded burdens on schools like mine that are doing the right thing. AB84 puts our programs for vulnerable youth at risk. We respectfully oppose AB84 and encourage continued collaboration on thoughtful Balance solutions. Thank you.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    And just a reminder, two minutes.

  • Eric Premack

    Person

    Yes, thank you. Good morning chair and Members, Eric Premack with the Charter Schools Development center here. On behalf of our center as well as the Charter Schools Association and the A organization and hundreds of charter schools schools, for over 30 years our center has been providing training precisely on these topics.

  • Eric Premack

    Person

    Fiscal accountability, business management, sound governance and ethics. We recognize that we have a problem with financial abuses in California's charter schools and this is why we've co sponsored Senate Bill 414 on this topic.

  • Eric Premack

    Person

    We've been fully engaged at table and as well thank staff for the support support that they've provided and we're negotiating hard and in good faith. We've identified over 20 proposals that are common that we can agree to and are still hard at work at table. But we remain very concerned with AB84 for a number of different reasons.

  • Eric Premack

    Person

    In General we believe it creates too many unnecessary and unfunded mandates, especially as it relates to auditing authorizer oversight and and charter school accounting and business management. It places non classroom based schools at risk of severe funding cuts even with the mitigation amendments that I gather will be taken today as Committee amendments.

  • Eric Premack

    Person

    It also restricts the authority of school districts that have fewer than 10,000 students to authorize new non classroom based charter schools. This includes about 85% of the state states districts and from our perspective creates essentially a backdoor permanent moratorium on new non classroom based charter schools in about 85% of the state.

  • Eric Premack

    Person

    Finally, we've been accused of quote unquote cherry picking the various recommendations from Mr. Fine's report and from the comptroller's report. But, and to that, to an extent we plead guilty. But the reason is we're seeking remedies that are actually implementable. I see the chair of the Budget Committee here.

  • Eric Premack

    Person

    Most of what's in here is not in the budget and the state has a serious financial problem and our schools budgets are very tight and as such our Bill, Senate Bill 414 is a much more focused cost effective measure.

  • Eric Premack

    Person

    For these and other reasons we really hope that you will vote against this Bill and work with us on 414 while we continue to work very hard behind the scenes negotiating. Thank you.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Thank you for your presentation. Now that we've heard from both support witnesses and opposition witnesses, we'll hear from all of our me toos. So both those in support and in opposition to the Bill.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    So we're going to use the mic over here at the railing and if you all could form a line towards that mic and we are going to ask people to clearly state their name, organization that they are with or who they are representing and position on the Bill.

  • Catlin Heller

    Person

    I'm Catlin o' Halloran Heller. I am the founder and board President of the Dixon Montessori Charter School in. Senator Cabaldin's district and I oppose this Bill.

  • Ashley Lugo

    Person

    Good morning. Ashley Lugo on behalf of the California county superintendents and respectful opposition to AB84. Thank you.

  • Jeff Rice

    Person

    Good morning. Jeff Rice with a representing more than 100 flex based charter schools in California and we remain opposed to AB84.

  • Jeff Vacca

    Person

    Good morning Madam Chair Members. Jeff Vacca representing the Riverside County Superintendent of Schools and concerns related to our role as authorizers.

  • Rec Kaminsky

    Person

    Good morning. Chair and Members. Rec Kaminsky on behalf of the Association of California School Administrators also registering concern on regard to the coherence on the new authorizer responsibilities and resources. Thank you.

  • Lucy Carter

    Person

    Lucy Salcedo Carter with the Alameda County Office of Education also expressing concern with. Regard to the role of authorizers. Thank you.

  • Xavier Maltese

    Person

    Xavier Maltese with the California Charter Schools Association in opposition to this Bill.

  • Lucy Carter

    Person

    Cynthia Rachel from Innovative Education Management opposed to the Bill.

  • Juliana Hubbell

    Person

    Good morning. Juliana Hubbell representing Springs Charter Schools, a credo gap busting network and we are. Opposed to the Bill. Thank you.

  • Debbie Cole

    Person

    Debbie Cole from Pacific Coast Academy in. San Diego County and I oppose this Bill.

  • Craig Cole

    Person

    Thank you for your time. Craig Cole and I oppose AB84. Don't leave these children behind. Thank you.

  • Ruby Everson

    Person

    My name is Ruby Everson. I'm a senior at Mission Vista Academy. In Riverside County and I oppose AB84.

  • Audrey Everson

    Person

    Good Morning Committee. My name is Audrey Everson, a parent with Mission Vista Academy in Riverside County and I oppose AB84.

  • Debbie Cole

    Person

    Good morning. I'm Cena Fisher, senior Director with Mission. Vista Academy in Riverside and I oppose AB84.

  • Faith Swenson

    Person

    My name is Faith Swenson. I. I am A. Junior at Mission. Vista Academy and I'm from Huntington Beach. And I oppose this Bill.

  • Denise Aguilar

    Person

    Hello. Denise Aguilar, co founder of freedom angels with 10,000 people. We are representing in opposition including California. Parents Rights act now. Thank you.

  • Debbie Cole

    Person

    Hello. Tara Thornton, also co founder of Freedom Angels, representing stakeholders across the entire state. Strong opposition. Thank you.

  • Sofia Karstens

    Person

    Hello. Sophia Karstens, decentralized America strongly oppose AB84.

  • Sarai Foxworthy

    Person

    Hello. My name is Sarai Foxworthy. I'm a student with Feather River Charter and I strongly oppose this Bill.

  • Lillian Ray

    Person

    My name is Lillian Ray and I'm. Going to be a freshman at Forest Charter in Nevada county and I strongly oppose this Bill.

  • Michelle Stanley

    Person

    Good morning. Michelle Stanley with the Classical academies and we stand in opposition to this Bill.

  • Carmen Canelio

    Person

    Good morning. I'm Carmen Canelio. I'm the chief business officer for the Classical Academies in North San Diego in opposition to AB84.

  • Barrett Snider

    Person

    Good morning. Barrett Snyder of the Small School Districts Association. We have an opposed unless amended position. And on behalf of the San Diego County Office of ED and the San Diego Unified School District, my colleague Sierra, who is not here, we signed a letter with some concerns around authorizer issues. Thank you.

  • Dean Foreman

    Person

    Dr. Dean Foreman, Co founder of John Adams Academies in Sacramento and Roseville and El Dorado Hills, voicing strong opposition to AB84.

  • Bree Gordon

    Person

    My name is Bree Gordon. I work at John Adams Academy and. I also have children at John Adams Academy and Horizon Charter Schools. And I strongly oppose this Bill.

  • Carlos Sineguez

    Person

    Good morning. Carlos Sineguez, representing John Adams Academy and over 4,000 families with strong opposition to AB84. Thank you.

  • Robin Nelson

    Person

    Hello, my name is Robin Nelson. I'm home schooling parent from Ontario, California and I'm in strong opposition. Thank you.

  • Judy Nelson

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Judy Nelson. I'm the former mayor of the City of Glendora. Thank you, Senator Perez, for representing our city. I'm a founding Member of Save Glendora Schools and we strongly, strongly oppose this Bill. Thank you.

  • Meg Madden

    Person

    Meg Madden, charter school mom for 20 years. And on behalf of longtime homeschooling charter moms Heather McClure, Audra Starrett and Amy Rush, homeschool charter teachers Wendy Brandt and Stephanie Gutierrez. Also Amy and Ben Anderson, parents of a disabled child who is thriving in his charter home school.

  • Meg Madden

    Person

    And on behalf of California disabled students for equitable education options and in strong and informed opposition to AB84. Thank you.

  • Nicole Young

    Person

    My name is Nicole Young. I'm representing Dr. Beverly Serra, Moms for Liberty Yolo, Lake Shasta, San Luis Obispo, Contra Costa, Orange Placer, Fresno Tlaminy, Santa Barbara, San Diego, Calusa, Los Angeles and Alameda County. The children matter. Kern County. Kern County against mandates.

  • Nicole Young

    Person

    Brianna Gomez, Callie Johnson, Christine Bowers, Emily Rippenberg, Monica Berbiska, Olivia Amara, Amanda Parker, Teresa Grimm, Seth Johnson Rossi, Ann Salibaher, Megan Van Schreiber, Allison Gaskins, Brian and Wendy Heisey. And more importantly, my son, whose brick and mortar school told him he would never learn to read, homeschooled him through a charter. He's now a senior at SDSU.

  • Nicole Young

    Person

    We are all in strong and informed opposition. Thank you.

  • Janelle Williams

    Person

    Hi, my name is Janelle Williams, and I am here as a parent with a homeschool family through the charter at Nevada City Forest Charter. My children are also here, and we are in strong opposition to AB84. We really need to have this shut down. Thank you.

  • Elizabeth Foxworthy

    Person

    Hello. My name is Elizabeth Foxworthy from Forest Hill, California. I homeschool my sixth grader and ninth grader. We're with Feather River Charter, and we strongly oppose AB84.

  • Julie Crandall

    Person

    Good morning. I'm Julie Crandall. I'm the Principal Superintendent of Home Tech Charter in Paradise, and we strongly oppose AB84.

  • Larry King

    Person

    Good morning. Larry King, former Superintendent Authorizer of the Acton Aguadulce Unified School District, where we authorize 17 charter school organizations. And on behalf of Sage Oak Charter Schools, I'm the Senior Director of Outreach and Development. Strongly oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Megan McCune

    Person

    Hi, I'm Megan McCune. I'm a charter school mom and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Sean McKeown

    Person

    I am Sean McKeown. I'm a homeschool parent. I've read the bill and I strongly oppose it and request a no vote.

  • John Egnor

    Person

    Good morning. My name is John Egnor. I'm with Pacific Coast Academy. I represent over 800 families of students with IEPs in our school. And I'm also the parent of a child in an independent study type program. Were in strong opposition to this bill. Thank you.

  • Teresa Copenhaver

    Person

    Hello, I'm Teresa Copenhaver. I'm the Executive Director and Principal of Circle of Independent Learning Charter School, servicing 40% at Promise students in Alameda County and all surrounding counties in that area in the Bay Area. We strongly and informally oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Jerilyn Fisher

    Person

    Jerilyn Fisher. I'm a parent as well as a credentialed teacher with Feather River Charter School, and I respectfully oppose AB84.

  • Eliana Fisher

    Person

    My name is Eliana Fisher. I'm a charter school student, and I respectfully oppose AB84.

  • Aliyah Fisher

    Person

    My name is Aliyah Fisher. I'm a charter school student, and I, I oppose AB84.

  • Audra Byers

    Person

    My name is Audra Byers. I'm a homeschool parent with Feather River Charter. I respectfully oppose AB84.

  • Ethan Byers

    Person

    My name is Ethan Byers. I am a charter school student. I respectfully oppose this bill.

  • Annette Coonsey

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Annette Coonsey. I am a homeschool grandma to two granddaughters and also a local school board trustee in my local community, and I respectfully oppose this bill. Thank you.

  • Lauren Copier

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Lauren Copier, and I am a homeschool parent with South Sutter Charter School, and I oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Christine Winkler

    Person

    Good morning. I'm Christine Winkler from San Diego. County. We've been homeschooling our only child, Christian, for six years. We strongly oppose AB84.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    I'm Christian from San Diego. I'm a charter school student. I strongly oppose this bill.

  • Jennifer Caza

    Person

    Good morning. Jennifer Caza, Superintendent of the JCS Family of Charter Schools serving 1800 students in San Diego and Riverside County.

  • Jillian Tonkin

    Person

    And we oppose Jillian Tonkin, also with JCS Family of Charter Schools, and I oppose this bill.

  • Debbie Gooding

    Person

    Hi. I'm Debbie Gooding, Executive Director of Learning Choice Academy. We serve three schools down in San Diego, county, and I strongly, strongly oppose this bill.

  • Heather Marshall

    Person

    Good morning. I'm Heather Marshall with New Pacific Charter Schools, Rio Valley Charter School, and the entire Pacific Charter Institute, and we absolutely oppose this bill. Thank you.

  • Lauren Azevedo Smith

    Person

    Hello. My name is Lauren Azevedo Smith. I have been a California educator for 19 years. I am a teacher for Pacific Coast Academy. I am also a homeschool parent with Pacific Coast Academy. I serve families in the South Bay of San Diego, and I oppose AB84.

  • Shawnee Reliford

    Person

    Go ahead. I got you.

  • Sala Smith

    Person

    Hi. My name is Sala Smith, and I oppose AB84.

  • Clifter Smith

    Person

    My name is Clifter Smith. I'm a parent of Pacific Coast Academy. My daughters are students there, and I oppose AB84.

  • Adriana Rucker

    Person

    My name is Adriana Rucker. I'm a special education teacher, and I oppose AB84.

  • Cynthia Rucker

    Person

    My name is Cynthia Rucker. I'm a parent and I oppose AB84.

  • Gabriela Dobrescu

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Gabriela Dobrescu. I'm a homeschool parent with Ocean Grove Charter School and I oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    My name is Benjamin and I oppose AB84.

  • Bernadette Lumley

    Person

    My name is Bernadette Lumley and I oppose AB84.

  • Sharon Machini

    Person

    My Name is Sharon Machini from NP3 Charter serving students seat based in Sacramento, California and we are opposed to AB84.

  • Melissa Mori

    Person

    Good morning. Melissa Mori, also representing NP3 Charter High School as principal and parent, and I oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Shannon Green

    Person

    Shannon Green with California Pacific Charter, San Diego, and I oppose AB84.

  • Erica Stevens

    Person

    Erica Stevens, also with California Pacific Charter School, and I oppose AB84.

  • Erin Reinberg

    Person

    Erin Reinberg, Assistant Director of TK8 at California Pacific Charter Schools, Los Angeles, San Diego and Sonoma from Sonoma county, and I oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Victoria Campbell

    Person

    Victoria Campbell with California Pacific Charter Schools in opposition of AB84.

  • Sarah Greco

    Person

    I'm Sarah Greco with Sequoia Grove Charter Alliance and I oppose AB84.

  • Shannon Breckenridge

    Person

    I'm Shannon Breckenridge with Lakeview Charter, Clarksville Charter and Feather River Charter, serving students in 14 counties in Northern California with sparkling clean audits, I might add. And I oppose AB84.

  • Marcie Boyd

    Person

    My name is Marcie Boyd. I'm with Clarksville, Feather River and Lakeview Charter Schools and I respectfully oppose AB8.4.

  • Michael Cox

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Michael Cox. I'm with Western Sierra Charter Schools. We serve approximately 700 students in Madera and Fresno Counties and I'm here to oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Jody Jeffers

    Person

    Hello. Jody Jeffers, CBO for Western Sierra Charter Schools, and I oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • David Beckingham

    Person

    My name is David Beckingham. I'm a charter school grandparent and I oppose AB84.

  • Tiffany Temperman

    Person

    My name is Tiffany Temperman. I'm a charter school parent and I oppose AB84.

  • Sala Smith

    Person

    I oppose AB84.

  • Cheryl Beckingham

    Person

    My name is Cheryl Beckingham. I am a charter school grandparent and I oppose AB84.

  • Sydney Garcia

    Person

    Good morning. I'm Sydney Garcia. I'm the Executive Director for The Cottonwood School. It's an award winning TK12 flex based public charter school serving over 3500 students, including a Montessori inspired high school in El Dorado Hills and throughout Sacramento, Placer, Amador and Alpine counties. We are committed to whole child personal learning and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Jeanette Sansenbach

    Person

    Jeanette Sansenbach, 4th grade teacher, Folsom Cordova Unified, also President of their Association, FCEA and we strongly approve AB84.

  • Anna Cordero

    Person

    Anna Cordero, 17 year virtual educator, 8th grade history teacher serving California Virtual Academy's 14,000 students. Strongly support AB84.

  • Lisa Wilkins

    Person

    Lisa Lennon Wilkins, middle school science teacher and President of the Lodi Education Association and I strongly approve AB84. Thank you.

  • Tanya Halverson

    Person

    Tanya Halverson, California Virtual Academy Charter School teacher. I support AB84.

  • Christopher Anderson

    Person

    Dr. Christopher Anderson, President of the Stockton Teachers Association. 25 year teacher, rise in support of this AB. Thank you.

  • Rob Reynolds

    Person

    Good morning. Rob Reynolds, I'm a high school alternative education teacher in San Joaquin County. I regularly teach children who have been failed by charter schools and I rise in support of the this bill.

  • Britney Ward

    Person

    Hello, I'm Britney Ward and I'm an elementary school public school teacher very proud to be and also the President of Twin Rivers United Educators whose board oversight was on Highlands. So I very strongly support AB84.

  • Araceli Perez

    Person

    Good morning. Araceli Perez, I'm a credentialed teacher. I had my children in charter schools. I worked at Highlands and was fired because I was a whistleblower on fiscal fraud. I strongly, strongly support AB84.

  • Vanessa Cuteback

    Person

    My name is Vanessa Cuteback, 2nd Vice President of Sacramento City Teachers Association, 3rd grade teacher at VB Hearst, mother of a charter school graduate and I spent most of my year years teaching in charter schools and I strongly support AB84.

  • Deanna Blockson

    Person

    Hello, my name is Deanna Blockson. I am a sixth grade teacher at Anakir Chicator Elementary School in the Elk Grove Unified School District and I strongly support AB84.

  • Faye Grundle

    Person

    Hello, my name is Faye Grundle. I am a transitional kindergarten teacher in Orangevale, open in Fair Oaks in part of the San Juan Unified School District. And my son went to a charter school and I very much support AB84.

  • Nicole Piper

    Person

    Hello, my name is Nicole Piper. I'm a teacher at California Virtual Academies. I also represent over 1100 educators at California Virtual Educators United and we support AB84. Thank you.

  • Francisco Villas

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Francisco Villas Sr. I'm a special education teacher for California Virtual Academies and I strongly support Assembly Bill 84.

  • Nancy Mowry

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Nancy Mowry. I'm a first grade teacher at California Virtual Academies. My own three students attended there and I strongly am in support of AB84.

  • Ron Walker

    Person

    Good morning. My name's Ron Walker. I'm a bus driver groundsman for Orland Unified School District, also on the CSEA Board of Directors and I strongly support 84.

  • Michael Gandra

    Person

    Good morning. Michael Gandra with CSEA Pace Committee and I strongly support this bill.

  • Adar Gunn

    Person

    Adar Clark Gunn with CSCA President for San Juan Unified School District in support of AB84.

  • Florentina Janaro

    Person

    Florentina de Janaro, mother of three on opposing this bill. Also representing Glad Tidings, Yuba City and Freedom Coalition in Yuba City. Opposed with Mom Army. Thank you.

  • Sylvia Sorenson

    Person

    Hello, everyone. Thanks for hearing all of us. My name is Sylvia Sorenson. I'm also with Moms for Liberty Emmer County. This is my daughter, Summer Sorenson. She's attending a charter school, and we are both in opposing AB804. Thank you so much.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    Hi, my name is. Hi. My name is Matisse. I'm eight years old. I'm from Los Angeles, and I strongly, very strongly oppose AB84.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    Hi, my name is Heather from Los Angeles. I'm a charter school parent and the founder of Creative Learners of Los Angeles. We strongly oppose AB84 and ask that if there's any shred of doubt as to what this bill will do to our students, that you vote no. Thank you.

  • Eric Phelan

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Eric Phelan, and I'm a parent of a charter student, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Maria Zuniga

    Person

    Hello. My name is Maria Fernanda Zuniga, US graduate in nonprofit management and leadership. I understand the importance of oversight, yet this bill does not do that, and it puts in danger our children who are interested.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So as a reminder, this is just a MeToo moment. So that means that we have the name, your organization that you're representing, and your position. That's the only thing that we're going to be allowing at this time.

  • Eric Zuniga

    Person

    Thank you. My name is Eric Zuniga, Stanford Class of 2005, homeschool parent, and I strongly oppose this bill.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    Step on 8084.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So well dressed. Love the level of decorum.

  • Lorraine Burch

    Person

    My name is Lorraine Burch. I'm a homeschool. I'm sorry? I'm a charter school mother of four that attend Clarksville, and I oppose this bill.

  • Diana Fearhelm

    Person

    My name is Diana Fearhelm. I am a charter school mom and I strongly oppose this bill.

  • Sarah Satterfield

    Person

    Sarah Satterfield. I am a credential teacher with Clarksville Charter School. My husband is also works in independent study charter schools. My four children have all benefited from charter schools. I oppose this bill. Thanks.

  • Danielle Balmunk

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Danielle Balmunk. I am a proud parent of three successful charter school students as well as a credentialed teacher with Clarksville Charter School. I strongly oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Lori Grgich

    Person

    Hi, I'm Lori Grgich, a credentialed teacher with Clarksville Charter School and a parent for a student in Camino Polytechnic Charter School. I strongly oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Mary Stein

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Mary Stein. I'm a credentialed teacher with Clarksville Charter School, and I'm also a parent for charter students. Thank you. And I definitely oppose AB84.

  • Jana McKnight

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Jana McKnight and I am a certified teacher through Clarksville. But I am also a mother of a special needs son who would greatly be impacted by this bill. So I strongly oppose. Thank you.

  • Eduardo de Leon

    Person

    Good morning. I'm Eduardo De Leon. I'm the Executive Director of the Language Academy of Sacramento. We are a TK8 dual language program here and I strongly urge you no vote on AB84.

  • Jose Diaz

    Person

    Good morning. Jose Diaz from Albert Einstein Academies, representing San Diego, California or San Diego? Yes, California. In opposition of AB84 and support 414. Thank you.

  • Jessica Spolino

    Person

    Hello, I'm Jessica Spolino with Method Schools. I have seen the NCB modality save hundreds of students and I am in opposition of AB84.

  • Mark Cawley

    Person

    Hi, I'm Mark Cawley, Method Schools. I've spent half my career with the school district and half with charter schools and I'm in strong opposition of 84.

  • Evelyn Anderson

    Person

    Good morning. I'm Evelyn Anderson. I'm principal of the Santa Rosa French American Charter School. We serve students from throughout Sonoma county and I oppose AB84.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    My name is Sailor. I'm from Mather. I'm a charter student and I oppose AB84.

  • Benjamin Slattin

    Person

    My name is Benjamin Slattin. I am 11. I am a charter school student and I oppose this bill.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    I'm a mother of two charter school students. I was a charter student myself because I was failed by the public school and we strongly oppose AB84.

  • Amity Chavez

    Person

    I'm Amity Chavez, mother of two boys who thrive at Sutter Peak Charter Academy, and I oppose AB84.

  • Ronan Chavez

    Person

    My name is Ronan Chavez. I'm a student of Sutter Peak and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Carrie Harrell

    Person

    Hi, my name is Carrie Harrell. I have worked in classroom based schools, but I am a parent of three students at Sequoia Grove Charter School and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Daniel Harrell

    Person

    I'm Daniel Harrell and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Andrea Harrell

    Person

    My name is Andrea Harrell. I'm a student at Feather River and Sequoia Grove Charter School and I oppose this bill.

  • Kristen Dumafani

    Person

    My name is Kristen Dumafani. I'm the Executive Director for Pacific Coast Academy and I strongly oppose this bill.

  • Amy Davis

    Person

    Hi, I'm Amy Davis with Mission Vista Academy, the Executive Director, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Jenna Lorge

    Person

    My name is Jenna Lorge, the Executive Director for Cabrillo Point Academy, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Sherry Erlanson

    Person

    My name is Sherry Erlanson and I strongly oppose this bill.

  • Erica Vanderspeck

    Person

    Hello, my name is Dr. Erica Vanderspeck. I'm the Deputy Executive Director with Cabrillo Point Academy. This is my 22nd year in charter education, and I'm a proud parent of a charter school graduate, and I oppose AB84.

  • Jason Sittimer

    Person

    Hi, my name is Jason Sittimer. I'm here with Charter Impact. We are a back office provider supporting over 100 schools in California authorized by more than 35 districts and counties. And I oppose AB84.

  • David Lueck

    Person

    My name is David Lueck. I'm also with Charter Impact, and I'm a proud parent of a charter school student at Granada Hills Charter in Los Angeles. I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    Hello, my name is Andrea, and I'm a mother to two charter school students who are thriving, and we strongly oppose AB84.

  • Jana McKnight

    Person

    Thank you.

  • Sherrilyn Westbrook

    Person

    Hi, I'm Dr. Sherrilyn Westbrook, a child psychologist and proud parent of a Golden Valley Charter School student. And I oppose AD 84.

  • Jeff Westbrook

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Jeff Westbrook, and I'm a father of a daughter who is going to second grade at Golden Valley Charter School in Orangevale. And we oppose 84. Thank you for your time.

  • Briana Galbraith

    Person

    Hello. My name is Briana Galbraith. I am a mother of three kids who are thriving at Golden Valley Waldorf Charter School, and I oppose AB85.

  • Genevieve Buckley

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Genevieve Buckley, mother of two at Golden Valley Charter School, and I oppose AB84.

  • Jennifer Hoover

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Jennifer Hoover. I'm a leader at Golden Valley Charter Schools. I'm here with my son who's a student there, and I strongly oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Erica Petrie

    Person

    Hi. My name is Erica Davis Petrie. I'm Past President of the Homeschool Association of California. I and my board strongly oppose AB84.

  • Ashley Witt

    Person

    Ashley Witt from Long Beach, California, mother of three charter students, and I oppose AB84.

  • Greg Blankenbuehler

    Person

    Hi, I'm Greg Blankenbuehler. I am a teacher at John Adams Academy, where I run a successful choir program. I'm also a parent of a, a daughter who goes there, and my wife also accompanies for me, and I'm strongly opposed to this bill.

  • Erica Blankenbuehler

    Person

    I'm Erica Blankenbuehler from Sacramento county, and I help run an arts program at a charter school, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Kate Blankenbuehler

    Person

    Hi, I'm Kate Blankenbuehler. I go to a local charter school, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Gerard

    Person

    I'm John Gerard. I'm a Superintendent for Horizons Charter School. I represent 1700 students and. And we strongly oppose ABAD 4.

  • Lance Christensen

    Person

    Hi. Lance Christianson. Vice President of the California Policy Center. We're strongly opposed. Also represent a coalition of over two dozen free education freedom advocates in opposition. And as a father of four kids who also access the charter schools, were opposed to this bill. Thank you.

  • Beverly Talbot

    Person

    Beverly Talbot, a registered Democrat from San Francisco, on behalf of CAUSE and Women Are Real, I strongly oppose this bill.

  • Amber Arias

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Amber Arias. I run a ministry, Stand Up Ministry Calvary Chapel, Solano. I'm a homeschool mom of two children. I'm in strong opposition of AB84. Thank you.

  • Greg Bird

    Person

    My name is Greg Bird, Vice President of the California Family Council. And strong opposition. I actually have three kids who went through homeschooled charter schools and this is a threat to them. Thank you.

  • Janice Malley

    Person

    Good morning. Janice O'Malley with AFSCME California in support.

  • Tiffany Mok

    Person

    Tiffany Mock on behalf of CFT, A Union of Educators and Classified Professionals in strong support. Thank you so much.

  • Elmer Lazardi

    Person

    Good morning. Elmer Lazardi here on behalf of the California Federation of Labor Unions, co-sponsor in support. Thank you.

  • Ebrin Ferrier

    Person

    Ebrin Ferrier with California Family Council in opposition.

  • Shawnee Reliford

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Shawnee Reliford. I have a son who has ADHD combined unspecified impulse control. He had trouble in public school. We tried South Sutter in August and he's thrived. I oppose.

  • Claire Neal

    Person

    My name is Claire Neal and I'm a homeschooler. Griffin and I show.

  • Christine Alt

    Person

    Hi. My name is Christine Alt and my sister has successfully raised six children who five of them have gone on to graduate college with many multiple different degrees. And I've raised three homeschool kids and I've been a homeschool educator for over 12 years. I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Alison O'Haver

    Person

    Hello, I'm Alison O'Haver. I'm a parent of two charter school students and I oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Lily La Savio

    Person

    Hello. My name is Lily La Savio. I'm a homeschool parent and a credential teacher and I represent 3,000 students at Clarksville Charter School. I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Jessica Hall

    Person

    Thank you for your time. Hi. My name is Jessica Hall. I'm a credential teacher at Clarksville Charter School. And this is my son Wyatt. He's a student at Clarksville Charter School and we oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    My name is Blake and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Tiffany Millen

    Person

    My name is Tiffany Millen and I am the Director of the Natomas Homeschool Alliance. On behalf of the hundreds of medically fragile and special needs students that I work with who are not able to be here to stand this line, I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Kristi Smith

    Person

    Hi, I'm Kristi Smith, a credentialed teacher with Heritage Peak Charter School and also homeschooled my three children through charter schools. And I'm opposed to AB84.

  • Cami Wanis

    Person

    Hi, I'm Kami Wanis. I'm a credentialed teacher and homeschool parent. I also represent Re Village Napa, which has 75 families homeschooling, and we all strongly oppose AB84.

  • Kenya Moanas

    Person

    My name is Kenya Moanas, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Eric Wanis

    Person

    My name Is Eric Wanis, a credentialed teacher of over 30 years. I'm here in opposition of AB84.

  • Kristen Welch

    Person

    Thank you for this opportunity. I'm Kristen Welch. I am an ELA teacher at Natomas Homeschool Alliance. I successfully homeschooled all three of my daughters through a charter. They're all productive Members of society now in good jobs, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Heather Welch

    Person

    Hi, I'm Heather Welch. My kids are part of Heritage Peak Charter, and we strongly oppose.

  • Natalia Human

    Person

    Hi, I'm Natalia Human. I'm a registered nurse and I also homeschool my daughter, and I strongly oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Abigail Huguy

    Person

    My name is Abigail Huguy. I am a charter school student and I oppose AB84.

  • Damian Phillips

    Person

    My name is Dr. Damian Phillips. I serve students at Yosemite Valley Charter and Monarch River Academy, and I strongly oppose AB884.

  • Stephanie Johnson

    Person

    Hi, my name is Stephanie Johnson. I'm Superintendent of Yosemite Valley Charter School and Monarch River Academy. We serve 10 counties across Central California, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Anna Wilkinson

    Person

    Hi, I'm Anna Wilkinson. I'm with Yosemite Valley and Monarch River Academy, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • April Green

    Person

    Hi, my name is April Green. I'm both a parent of a student with autism that attends the Cottonwood School. I'm also a special education teacher at Yosemite Valley and Monarch River Academy, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Jenny Plumb

    Person

    Hi, my name is Jenny Plumb. I'm assistant Superintendent of student support at Yosemite Valley and Monarch River Charter schools. I represent 600 special ed students today who might be medically fragile or unable to come today, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Micheline Fitzgerald

    Person

    Hi, I'm Micheline Fitzgerald. I also work at Yosemite Valley Charter and Monarch River Academy. I represent 4,500 students in 10 counties, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Christopher Williams

    Person

    Hello, my name is Christopher Williams. I work with Absolute Charter Group, a back office management finance company. I'm a CPA and a certified fraud examiner as well. I'm here representing Yosemite Valley Charter School and Monarch River Academy, where we utilize fraud risk controls. And I strongly oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Magaly Zagal

    Person

    Good morning, Members. Magali Zagal, on behalf of Aspire Public School, Aspire Public Schools, in opposition to the bill. Thank you.

  • Stephanie Cardenas

    Person

    Hi, my name is Stephanie Cardenas. I am an employee and proud parent of two students at California Montessori Project, and I strongly oppose this bill.

  • Matt Taylor

    Person

    Good morning. Matt Taylor, Superintendent at the California Montessori Project. We oppose this bill.

  • Diana Bergstrand

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Diana Bergstrand, currently pursuing a master's in education and teaching credential. I'm also a substitute for a local school district and a parent of four students enrolled at South Sutter Charter School, and I strongly oppose this bill.

  • Tulsi Bergstrand

    Person

    My name is Tulsi Bergstrand. I'm a charter school student and I oppose AB84.

  • Demi Bergsand

    Person

    My name is Demi Bergsand, and I'm a charter school student, and I opposed this. AB84.

  • Juniper Bergstrand

    Person

    My name is Juniper Bergstrand. I'm a charter school student and I oppose AB84.

  • Mia Bergstrand

    Person

    My name is Mia Bergstrand. I'm a charter school student with South Sutter and I oppose this bill.

  • Jude Rule

    Person

    My name is Jude Rule. I'm a charter school student and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Laura Castro

    Person

    My name is Laura Castro. I homeschool these three brilliant kids that are thriving through Cottonwood School, and We strongly oppose AB84.

  • Ashley Oliva

    Person

    Hi, my name is Ashley Oliva with Delta Managed Solutions. I am a former charter school student and a proud parent of a charter school graduate with a neurodegenerative autoimmune disability that would have never graduated without her charter school, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Joanne Fountain

    Person

    Hello, my name is Joanne Fountain with Delta Managed Solutions, and We serve over 40 charter schools throughout California and we strongly oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Jeff Clanton

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Jeff Clanton and I represent Delta Managed Solutions and I strongly oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Jerry Levers

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Jerry Levers. I'm the Executive Director of Connecting Water Charter School. We have over 2,000 students, 55% socioeconomically disadvantaged. I oppose AB84 because it's a sledgehammer when we need a scalpel. Thank you.

  • Kim Koski

    Person

    Hello, my name is Kim Koski and I work for Connecting Waters Charter School in Stanislaus County, and I strongly oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Laura Joseph

    Person

    Hello, my name is Laura Joseph and I work for Connecting Waters Charter School and have two students who have also graduated from charter schools. And I oppose AB84.

  • Anna Lisa Vargas

    Person

    My name is Lisa Vargas. I work for Connecting Waters Charter Schools and vendor relations. I'm also an ex homeschool mom through two charters, Connecting Waters and Keys to Learning, and I am opposed to AB84. Thank you.

  • Jennifer Sanguinetti

    Person

    My name is Jennifer Sanguinetti. I'm a mother of four from the Central Valley and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Julie Boersma

    Person

    Hi, my name is Julie Boersma. I'm the education services Director for Connecting Waters Charter Schools, which has three schools and we serve TK 12 in 13 counties, Central Valley to Bay Area.

  • Julie Boersma

    Person

    I strongly oppose 84 as a teacher and administrator. I also strongly oppose, as a past parent of a student, my own daughter who just graduated with honors after having two years of the opportunity to participate.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    I really apologize, but this is just name, organization and position on the bill.

  • Cheryl Whitcomb

    Person

    Hi, my name is Cheryl Whitcomb. I'm a teacher and I advocate of charter schools and homeschooling and I oppose.

  • Shawna Reisiewitz

    Person

    Hello, my name is Shawna Reisiewitz. I'm a teacher of 35 years in public schools, private schools, charter schools, both classroom based and non classroom Based also an ex CTA Member for 12 years. And all teachers know that classrooms do not meet all the needs of charter school. So I'm opposing. Yes.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Rachel Sullivan

    Person

    Hi, I'm Rachel Sullivan. I'm a mother and a 30 year teacher at both public and brick and mortar and non brick and mortar, and I oppose the bill. Thank you.

  • Michael Sullivan Howell

    Person

    My name is Michael Sullivan Howell. I am a graduate from Blue Ridge Academy based in Los Angeles. I support educational freedom and strongly oppose AB84. Thank you very much.

  • Wendy Eklund

    Person

    Hi, I'm Wendy Eklund, mom, charter school leader and community advocate, and I oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Ronna Yellen

    Person

    Hi, my name is Ronna Yellen from San Pedro. I'm on the leadership team at Suncoast Prep Charter School and a homeschool mom. I'm representing several thousand families in Almorasuchi's district, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Caitlin Bustamante

    Person

    Hello, my name is Caitlin Bustamante, and I am a charter school sibling as well as a product of both charter and traditional public schools, and I oppose AB84.

  • Katie Walker

    Person

    Hello, my name is Katie Walker. I'm a credentialed school psychologist and I oppose AB84.

  • Theresa Grant

    Person

    Hello, my name is Teresa Grant. I'm a credentialed school psychologist. I work at Suncoast Charter, and I oppose AB84.

  • Shawn Nerones

    Person

    Hello, my name is Shawn Nerones. I'm a credentialed speech pathologist. I oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Kira McAfee

    Person

    Hello, my name is Kira McAfee. I have three children enrolled in Clarksville Charter School, and I oppose AB84.

  • Lourdes Ornelas

    Person

    Hello, my name is Lourdes Ornelas, and I am a teacher at Carrillo Point Academy, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Charles Glowack

    Person

    Hello, my name is Charles Glowack. I'm a teacher at Cabrillo Point Academy, and I, along with my friends from Los Angeles Unified School District, United Teachers Los Angeles, strongly oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Starr Hendricks

    Person

    Hi, my name is Starr Hendricks. I'm a personalized learning teacher at Core Charter School and a proud mom of these three young men who attend my school. And I oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Angel Hill

    Person

    Hi. Good morning. My name is Angel Hill, and I am a mother of two. My son, who I successfully homeschooled through Core Charter School in Marysville. He's now 20, in college. And this is my daughter. I'm also homeschooling through Core Charter School in Marysville, and I oppose 84. Thank you.

  • Felicia Petrie

    Person

    My name is Felicia Petrie. I'm a educator of charter school students in Loomis, California, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Abigail Costello

    Person

    Hi, my name is Abigail Costello. I teach at John Adams Academy and I oppose AB84.

  • Shannon Percival

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Shannon Percival. I'm a teacher and a parent at John Adams Academy and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Anthony Suzano

    Person

    Good morning. I'm Anthony Suzano, Latin teacher at John Adams Academy and ivy. Strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Great. You can come and translate the Latin over the front of the Senate chambers next time you're there.

  • Keeley Burke

    Person

    Hi, my name is Keeley Burke and I'm a charter school student and I oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Peyton Burke

    Person

    Hello. My name is Peyton Burke and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Holly Welch

    Person

    Hello, my name is Holly Welch and I'm a charter school parent and I oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Tabitha Helms

    Person

    Hi, my name is Tabitha Helms. I'm a California credentialed teacher, parent of three homeschooled through our charter school, Pacific Coast Academy, and representing 17 families at Gather and Grow Homeschool Co op. We oppose this bill. Thank you.

  • Nicole Smith

    Person

    My name is Nicole Smith from San Diego. County. I'm a homeschool mom of four through Pacific Coast Academy. I'm also representing 17 families from our Gather and Go co op and we strongly oppose this bill. Thank you.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Sarah Ledesma

    Person

    Hi. This is my daughter Ruby, and my name is Sarah Ledesma. I am a parent and she is a charter student at Feather River Sequoia Grove. I am a two time cancer survivor and homeschool has saved my life as well as hers. So we oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you very much.

  • Barbara Goodman

    Person

    Hello. My name is Barbara Goodman and I'm here with my children. We've been homeschooling through Pacific Center Peakl. Center Peak. Charter School. Center Peak Charter Academy for 10 years and we oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Rachel Escalona

    Person

    Hi, I am Rachel Escalona. I am with Clarksville Charter School. I am a parent and a teacher with Clarksville and I highly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Rebecca Morales

    Person

    Morning. I'm Rebecca Morales. I'm a credentialed teacher with Clarksville Charter School and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Mary Frederick

    Person

    Hello, I'm Mary Frederick. I'm a credentialed California teacher and the administrator of Foothill Learning Academy, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Ruby Koontz

    Person

    My name is Ruby Koontz. I'm a charter school student and I oppose this bill.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Logan Ayres

    Person

    I'm Logan Ayres. I go to Cottonwood Charter School and I oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    My name is Ollie. I'm a charter school student and I oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    My name is Nova. I am a charter school student and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Alison Koontz

    Person

    My name is Allison Koontz. I'm a charter school parent and I strongly oppose this bill.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Kelly Ayres

    Person

    My name is Kelly Ayres. I'm a charter school parent and I strongly oppose this bill. Thank you.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Linda McCrory

    Person

    Hello. My name is Linda McCrory. I'm a charter school parent and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • River McCrory

    Person

    My name is River McCrory. I am a charter school student and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Krista Hargo

    Person

    My name is Krista Cant Hargo, and I'm a mental health worker and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Jillian Alaimo

    Person

    My name is Jillian Alaimo and I'm a parent at a charter school and they oppose this bill.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Halana Rockney

    Person

    My name is Halana Rockney. I'm a charter school student and I oppose AB84.

  • Addison Alaimo

    Person

    My name is Addison Alaimo. I'm a charter school student and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Sunshine O'Kennedy

    Person

    My name is Sunshine O'Kennedy. I am a charter school student and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • John Rockne

    Person

    My name is John Elise Rockne. I'm a charter school student and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Lisa Todd

    Person

    My name is Lisa Todd. I'm a retired instructional assistant for the public traditional public schools, and I strongly oppose this bill. AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Angela Botko

    Person

    Hello. My name is Angela Botko and I'm a teacher at Corr Charter School in Marysville. I also have. I also am a parent of two of daughters who go to the charter school, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Joe Geddes

    Person

    Hello. My name is Joe Geddes. I am a parent of charter school students and also a Sacramento current Sacramento City Unified School District teacher, and I oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Rylan Gaddis

    Person

    My name is Rylan Gaddis, and thanks to my charter, I'm able to go to high school and eventually college, and I oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Kaylyn Geddes

    Person

    Hi. Good morning. My name is Kaylyn Geddes. I'm a mom of five and advocate for charter schools, homeschool charters and independent study, and I oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Summer Jessie

    Person

    My name is Summer Jessie. My family has been enrolled with public charter schools for 14 years, and I oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Zoe Jessie

    Person

    Hello and good morning. My name is Zoe Jessie. I'm a recent graduate of a public charter school, and I oppose AB84. And if the aim of this institution is equity specifically for education, then I urge you to do the same.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    Thank you.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Zane Jesse

    Person

    Hello. My name is Zane Jesse. I am currently enrolled in a public charter school and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Heather Bingham

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Heather A. Bingham. I'm a credentialed teacher of 24 years and a parent of four, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Wendy Durad

    Person

    My name is Wendy Durad. I'm from Fresno, California. I'm a vendor for local charter schools and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Mark Durad

    Person

    Morning. My name is Mark Durad. I am a 7 year educator with Yosemite and Monarch Charter schools in Fresno, California. I oppose AB84. Thank you very much. Thank you.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    Hi, I'm Zoe. I'm thriving because of my non classroom based charter and I proudly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Jacqueline Baxter

    Person

    My name is Jacqueline Baxter and I'm the parent of two students at a non classroom based charter and I proudly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Colin Baxter

    Person

    My name is Colin Baxter. I'm a high school counselor at a public school in Sacramento county, and I have been for the last 12 years, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Tracy Feaster

    Person

    Hi, my name is Tracy Feaster. I am a charter school parent and I oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    My name is Lily and I'm a charter school student and I oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Nice T shirt.

  • Shannon Huber

    Person

    Hi, I'm Shannon Huber and I am a charter school parent and I oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Levi Huber

    Person

    My name is Levi Huber. I'm a charter school student and I oppose AB84.

  • Luke Huber

    Person

    Thank you. My name is Luke Huber. I'm a charter school student and I oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Jen Andres

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Jen Andres. I've been a homeschooling parent through the charter school for 15 years, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you very much.

  • Faustina Andres

    Person

    I'm Faustina Andres, a charter school student and I oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Isaac Height

    Person

    My name is Isaac Height. I'm a sixth grade student with Feather River Charter School in Elk Grove, California, and I oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Michelle Height

    Person

    Hi, my name is Michelle Height, and I'm a credentialed teacher of 25 years with Feather River Charter School serving students in Sacramento county. And I oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Amanda Penny

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Amanda Penny. This is my daughter, Everly, and we oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Clara Harvey

    Person

    Hi, my name is Clara Harvey. I am a student of Lakeview Charter School. I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you, Clara. You did great.

  • Erica Barish

    Person

    Hi, I'm Erica Barish. I'm a credentialed teacher and curriculum coordinator with Lakeview Charter School in Sequoia. Grove. I serve students in Mendocino County, and I'm strongly opposed to AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Evangeline Meshcheid

    Person

    Hi. My name is Evangeline Meshcheid, and I'm a student at Clarksville Charter School, and I oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Genevieve Scheid

    Person

    Hi. My name is Genevieve Scheid. I'm a parent of two students at Clarksville Charter School, and I oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • James Scheid

    Person

    Hi, I'm James Scheid. I am the parent of two lovely students that are enrolled through Clarksville Charter School, and we strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Kylie O'Kennedy

    Person

    Hello. My name is Kylie O'Kennedy. I'm a parent of charter students, and I oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Story O'Kennedy

    Person

    My name is Story O'Kennedy. I'm a charter school student, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Serenity O'Kennedy

    Person

    Hi, my name is Serenity O'Kennedy. I'm a charter school student, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Serenity Kennedy

    Person

    Hello. My name is Serenity Kennedy, and I very strongly oppose ABD 80.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    AB 84. Thank you very much.

  • Monica Flores

    Person

    Hi, my name is Monica Flores. I'm from Stockton, California, a parent of an autistic ADHD child who attends charter school, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Melanie Holder

    Person

    Hi, my name is Melanie Holder. I'm a homeschool charter school mom, and I oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Michael McGrath

    Person

    Hi, my name is Dr. Michael McGrath. My daughter attends South Sutter Charter School, and We strongly oppose Bill 84. Thank you.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you very much.

  • Francisco Englehard

    Person

    My name is Francisco Englehard, a disabled US army veteran. I was entrusted to defend this country. I should be entrusted to educate my children. I strongly oppose AB84.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you. Over to you.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    My name is Luca Charter Academy, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    My name is Rocky. I am a charter school student. I oppose AB84.

  • Jude Englehard

    Person

    Thank you. I'm Jude Englehard, and this is Flora Engelhard, and We strongly oppose AB84.

  • Viva Engelhard

    Person

    My name is Viva Engelhard. I am a charter school student, and I oppose AB84.

  • Dawn Gatius

    Person

    My name is Dawn Gatius, and I'm a credentialed teacher of 11 years, and I work at Sutter Peak Charter Academy, and we are green in both reading and math, and I oppose AB84.

  • Tempe Barrett

    Person

    Hi, my name is Tempe Barrett. I'm a student at Feather River Charter School, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Siobhan Bairt

    Person

    My name is Siobhan Bairt. I'm an employee at Feather River Charter School and also a parent of students at our charter school, and we strongly oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Cami Funk

    Person

    Hi, my name is Cami Funk. My daughter is enrolled in Clarksville Charter School, and we oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    My name is.

  • Samara Stoner

    Person

    My name is Samara Stoner. I'm a charter school student, and I oppose AB84.

  • Natalie Elko

    Person

    My name is Natalie Elko. I'm a charter school student, and I oppose AB84.

  • Jessica Elko

    Person

    Hi, my name is Jessica Elko. I'm a charter school parent, and I also oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Jennifer Rowe

    Person

    My name is Jennifer Rowe. I am a former charter school parent and a current vendor. I oppose AB84.

  • Lisa Hindmarsh

    Person

    My name is Lisa Hindmarsh, and I am a former charter school parent with a special needs child, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    I am Alex, and please vote now on AB84.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    Hello. My name is Cason. Please vote no on this AB84.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    Hello. My name is Colin, and I very strongly oppose AB84.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Ashley. Those are my boys. We homeschool. We love it. Please oppose this bill.

  • Arianna Keller

    Person

    My name is Arianna Keller. I work for New Hope Charter School that has a beautiful partnership with the Robles School District, serving their seventh and eighth graders. And I homeschool my kids through Cottonwood Charter School. I oppose AB84.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    Hi, my name is Lucas. I'm a charter school student, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Melissa Johnson

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Melissa Johnson. I'm a homeschool charter parent. I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    Hi, my name is Benjamin, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Jackie Teeple

    Person

    Hi, I'm Jackie Teeple. I'm grandmother and aunt to successfully homeschooled children. And please vote no for 84.

  • Milena Garcia

    Person

    My name is Milena Garcia, and I oppose.

  • Isla Garcia

    Person

    My name is Isla Garcia, and I oppose.

  • Elena Garcia

    Person

    My name is Elena Garcia, and I oppose this bill.

  • Jessica Westra

    Person

    My name is Jessica Westra. I am a public school drama teacher of 19 years and also a charter school parent, and I oppose AB84.

  • Olivia Westra

    Person

    My name is Olivia Westra, and I'm a charter school student, and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Janiel Cimino

    Person

    Hello, my name is Janiel Cimino. I am a charter school parent, and I'm also a board Member, and I oppose AB84 for many reasons. Some of them, or one of them would be that it would eliminate right now.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    It's just. Sorry about that. Just as a reminder, you know, it's been a while since we. That we've had a lot of testimonies. #MeToos. Going through. So just as a reminder for the public at this time, we've had.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    The way that the Committee works is that you have two leads, witnesses and we have two lead opposition witnesses and everyone else is considered a #MeToo, which means that we state our name, our organization that we're representing, and your position on the bill. So that is what we have right now.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So just as a reminder for the public, especially for those that are brand new, and especially for our kiddos.

  • Tiger Cimino

    Person

    Hello, my name is Tiger Cimino. I am a charter school student and I urge you to oppose AB84.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    Hello, my name is Jace and I am a charter school student and I urge you up to oppose AB84.

  • Benjamin Hartun

    Person

    My name is Benjamin Hartung, I'm a charter school educator and I oppose AB84.

  • Margie Hartung

    Person

    My name is Margie Hartung. I'm a grandmother of 15 charter school children and a mother of five successful, grand successful children in the charter school. Educator, music educator. And I oppose AB84.

  • Kathleen Porter

    Person

    My name is Kathleen Porter and I am with Feather River Charter School, homeschooling three children and I oppose AB84.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    My name is Ezra, I'm a charter school 2 student and I am 10 and I oppose AB84.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    My Name is Amelia. I am a charter school student and I oppose AB84.

  • Whitney Ellis

    Person

    My name is Whitney Ellis and I am the mother of two children that are learning and thriving and my son is healing from brain cancer because of the ability to be in a non classroom based charter. So we strongly oppose AB84 for our family and families just like ours.

  • Carter Ellis

    Person

    My name is Carter Ellis and I strongly oppose.

  • Ruby Ellis

    Person

    My name is Ruby Ellis and I oppose AB84.

  • Owen Tatum

    Person

    Hello, my name is Owen Tatum and I strongly oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Kim Tatum

    Person

    Hello. My name is Kim Tatum and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Paula Herrod

    Person

    My name is Paula Herrod and I strongly oppose AB84.

  • Bo Herrod

    Person

    My name Is Bo Herrod and I strongly oppose AB 84.

  • Cameron Tatum

    Person

    My name is Cameron Tatum. This is Posy Harrod. We're going into fifth grade and we strongly oppose AB84.

  • Lena Reyes

    Person

    My name is Lena El Reyes. I'm a parent of two public school kids and I'm a teacher who worked at Highlands Community Charter School, and I strongly support AB84.

  • Lindsey Curtis

    Person

    My name is Lindsey Curtis and I was an educator at Highlands Community Charter School, and I'm also in Strong support of AB84.

  • Selena Tasabia

    Person

    My name is Selena Tasabia. I'm a former Highlands Community Charter School teacher and I strongly support AB84.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    Good morning. We're the Dominguez family and we are with Cottonwood Charter School and we oppose AB84. Thank you.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    Hi. My name is Ayan. I'm in Cabrillo Point Academy. I'm here to vote no on AB 84.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    Hi. My name is Pallavi. My son goes to Cabrillo Point Academy. I strongly oppose AB 84. Thank you.

  • Amol Arrow

    Person

    Hi. My name is Amol Arrow. That's my son Ayan, and I strongly oppose AB 84.

  • Brock Campbell

    Person

    Hi. I'm Brock Campbell from the California Baptist Capitol Ministry on behalf of Lighthouse Baptist Church in Santa Maria, Faith Baptist Church in Wheatland, and Baptists for Biblical Values in opposition.

  • Emily Campbell

    Person

    Hi. I'm Emily Campbell with the California Baptist Capitol Ministry on behalf of Freedom's Way Baptist Church in Castaic. We oppose.

  • David Bolog

    Person

    David Bolog. Grateful for the Assembly Member getting all these family members involved in opposition. Thank you.

  • Melissa Warren

    Person

    My name is Melissa Warren, and I'm a charter school advocate and an aunt to charter students, and I oppose AB 84.

  • Leslie Loy

    Person

    My name is Leslie Loy. I'm a proud charter parent, and I oppose AB 84.

  • Felicity Gasser

    Person

    My name is Felicity Gasser. I'm a parent of two children at Golden Valley Charter Schools, and I oppose AB 84. Thank you.

  • Sarah Gillen

    Person

    My name is Sarah Gillen, and I oppose AB 84, and represent my family and community who desperately need charter schools. Thank you.

  • Adelita Gonzales

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Adelita Gonzales. I'm the President of the Homeschool Association of California, and I strongly oppose AB 84. Thank you.

  • Christopher Sanchez

    Person

    Good morning, Madam Chair and Members. Christopher Sanchez of the Consumer Federation of California in support.

  • Bear Creekmore

    Person

    Hi. Hi. I'm Bear Creekmore. I strongly oppose AB 84.

  • Nicole Creekmore

    Person

    Hi. I'm Nicole Creekmore with Homeschool Mule and a charter school, homeschool mom, and I strongly oppose AB 84.

  • Azure Creekmore

    Person

    I'm Azure Creekmore, and I also strongly oppose AB 84.

  • Donnie Creekmore

    Person

    My name is Donnie Creekmore with HomeschoolMule.com, and I strongly oppose AB 84.

  • Ezra Creekmore

    Person

    I am Ezra Creekmore. I am with Homeschool Mule, and I strongly, strongly oppose AB 84.

  • April Robinson

    Person

    Good morning, Chair and Committee. April Robinson, and I strongly oppose this bill. Thank you.

  • Jonathan Munoz

    Person

    Good afternoon, Madam Chair and Members. Jonathan Munoz on behalf of Green Dot Public Schools as well as Learn4Life Public Charter Schools in strong opposition.

  • Gabrielle Ingram

    Person

    Hi. I'm Gabrielle Ingram, founder of Stand Up Sacramento County, and we are members of Feather River Charter in opposition. Thank you.

  • Jim Edmonds

    Person

    Jim Edmonds in opposition of AB 84.

  • Kirk Kimmelshue

    Person

    Madam Chair and Members. Kirk Kimmelshue here today on behalf of Real Journey Academies. With your indulgence, just really want to thank the Assembly Member and his Committee staff as well as the Senate Education Committee staff. We've undertaken a lot of work on both bills. We know that process is going to continue. We have a lot left to go. But just really appreciate the staff's efforts and everyone's efforts around the table and hope those conversations are productive through the summer. But for now, opposed.

  • Christopher Bollinger

    Person

    Hi there. Chris Bollinger on behalf of the Opportunity Youth Schools Coalition and Lighthouse Charter School in opposition. Thank you.

  • Adam Keigwin

    Person

    Madam Chair and Senators. Adam Keigwin on behalf of Alliance College Ready Public Schools in opposition.

  • Michael Young

    Person

    Madam Chair and Members. Michael Young with the California Teachers Association in strong support.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Wow. We actually got through. That's pretty impressive. So I just want to commend all of the students that were able to come and attend and share their testimony and be part of the process of creating legislation in California. I hope this was a learning, a great learning and memorable experience for all of you.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Love the very well dressed, some of these kids were incredibly well dressed with suits. Probably better dressed than some folks out here that work here officially. But love to see them here. And I also wanted to commend many of the parents who are absolutely blessed and privileged to and honored to be able to homeschool their children. It is such a fast moving pace of life, you know, just life in general and how quickly time goes.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And when you have that opportunity to be able to spend that time and really cherish that time and help your child grow and learn, I think that's an amazing and beautiful gift that you're giving your child. So congratulations to those parents that are able to be able to do that. You're blessed and honored and privileged on that end. So congratulations. So we are going to bring it back to the dais, and we'll begin with Senator Laird.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you. They're starting the last bill in Natural Resources, so I was hoping to get a little discussion in before I have to run out and vote. And the reason I was smiling was that I had a bill heard yesterday based on a FCMAT study where I didn't take every recommendation. So I was relating to the circumstance. I missed part of the opening discussion because I was in another hearing. And I think that the problem is this has been reduced to a binary situation that you're either for this or against this. Or charter schools is one way or you're against it if it's another.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    And I voted for the Ashby bill, Senate Bill 414, which I didn't feel totally comfortable with because I know there's negotiations going on and that there's somebody that has a little bit of a more charter bill into it and this bill and various charter organizations and various education organizations. And I think that sometimes it's misread that if we support either of those bills, we are taking a position, when what we're really doing is feeding into the negotiations and allowing the negotiations to happen.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    And so I want to ask a couple of questions, even though I think the negotiations are where of the game is, to sort of address some of the concerns that I heard in people coming to my office or testifying or writing. And one of them is, I know this is in the weeds, but it seems like one of the big issues is about vendors. And the question is is under this bill, can non-classroom based charters continue to utilize non-credentialed vendors?

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Yes, except let me clarify. They can use vendors that are approved by teachers that are not coming at the request of the parents. So for example, if a teacher is rubber stamping a parent's request, that would not be appropriate. But if a teacher, a credentialed... Under this bill, under the current language of the bill, a credentialed teacher would be able to approve vendors using these enrichment vouchers.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Now let me also clarify, since there is a lot of parents and families that raise the medically fragile or children with special medical needs. If it is in an IEP, individualized education plan, as part of a professionally reviewed special education plan, these enrichment vouchers can continue to be used for any and all services that are included in IEPs.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    So we just want to crack down on the abuses. We know that we have heard documented cases of family members using these vouchers for multi-day Disneyland family passes. We've heard families using them for religious education programs, for private education programs.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    These, in essence what we have now are gifts of public funds that are privatizing, you know, public education dollars. And so, you know, while we understand that the homeschool model, you know, that parents are doing what parents do. They are advocating for the kids to get, you know, any additional services that they may be able to get through these enrichment vouchers.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    You know, I'm a parent of a public school parent, you know, and if I got, I mean, we're hearing reports that up to five, families are receiving up to $5,000 from some of these charter schools to, you know, advertise and to get more enrollment. And so we're just trying to crack down on the abuses while at the same time allow for legitimate educational or special...

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Back to the original question on vendors, which you answered. One of the criticisms then is that somehow charter schools are being held to a higher standard than public schools. Could you speak to that?

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Absolutely not. I mean. Well, first of all...

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Well no, absolutely not. Not that you're not going to speak to it. Okay. Just checking.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Thank you, Senator, for the clarification. I mean, first of all, public schools are not giving thousands of dollars in, you know, Proposition 98 taxpayer dollars to parents. I mean, and that's why I suspect if the vast majority of the parents and kids that testified in opposition, if they were allowed to explain their opposition.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    The biggest concern from the homeschool parents in particular is that we're proposing to, you know, limit or set guardrails on what essentially, you know, they have no guardrails now under existing law. I don't know if Mr. Fine with FCMAT wants to add any anything further in terms of FCMAT's recommendation as to, or Ms. Mancini.

  • Cassandra Mancini

    Person

    Yeah. Cassie Mancini with CSEA. I think I would say the intent of this bill is always to apply what we're doing equally to all types of local education agencies. Charter schools, public schools, non-classroom based schools. Everyone. And I know that in our conversations around this section of the bill on educational enrichment activities, that's, I think, what the direction we're moving towards in negotiations and we hope to make substantial progress on that over the summer.

  • Cassandra Mancini

    Person

    But when I first learned about this issue, I was kind of confused because it was always my impression that homeschools were outside our traditional public education system. And as we learned more about this, we've seen many non-classroom based charter schools start to market themselves specifically to homeschool parents by offering this money. And I think from our perspective, we feel that students are really entitled to the most robust education.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Okay, thank you. Let me just ask the charter person, if it's okay with the Chair. Chair, Chair? It's okay if I ask the charter person to respond?

  • Eric Premack

    Person

    Yeah. If their bill said what Assembly Member Muratsuchi says is their intent, what they would have is our language in Senate Bill 414, which explicitly requires teacher sign off and authorization. Their bill doesn't do that. Their bill does discriminate. It allows recipients of ELOP funding, which non-classroom based schools don't get.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Expanded Learning Opportunities Program. Since I'm on a campaign against acronyms in the Education Budget Subcommittee. People need to know what you're talking about.

  • Eric Premack

    Person

    As you know, most public schools are eligible for ELOP funding with the exception of non-classroom based schools. And they can spend this money quite flexibly, including on non-credentialed staff who provide expanded learning.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Let me just say that what we're experiencing is you're advocating for the bill that's in negotiations. He's advocating for the bill that's in negotiations. And what you're doing is saving everybody negotiations time by having the negotiations here. But you're making the point of what is going to be discussed in that, and that is one difference.

  • Eric Premack

    Person

    More important, our bill does exactly...

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    That's why we have hearing on that bill that is separate. So then let me... They're yelling at me to get over to Natural Resources, but let me try to finish this. There are a couple of other things. And one is, is that there's a moratorium on non-classroom based charter schools that expires on January 1st. And I believe that's part of your motivation. So why is this bill important to do given that expiration?

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Yes. Thank you, Senator. So the moratorium was placed because of these high profile cases of documented fraud. And so it's urgent for the Legislature to take action this year to ensure that when the moratorium expires that we have the necessary guardrails in place so that we can prevent these kinds of hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayer dollars being defrauded. That is why we need to take action this year.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    And then one last thing, because a lot of the incoming basically said this bill bans homeschooling or it defunds charter schools. Could you speak to that?

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Yes, sir. Yeah. As I started my presentation, this is not an anti-charter school bill. This is not an anti-home school bill. This is an anti-bad actor bill. This is a good government bill that is trying to crack down again on the multiple cases of hundreds of millions of dollars that have been abused. And so I think, I hope, you know, we have...

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    I mean the Charter School Association, the opposition acknowledged that we have a problem. So we have that common ground. I think we heard the spirit of agreement in terms of needing guardrails on the enrichment vouchers, you know, although you know that's going to be an ongoing philosophical conversation. But that is not this bill.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you. And I apologize because I have to go. But this has been an important discussion because I hope that you hear some of the things that were heard in the negotiations, and I hope you do as well. And what this really does and what the hearing on SB 414, the Ashby bill, was to lay these issues on the table so they can be discussed and resolved. And I think all of us reserve the right at the future not to support the outcome if some of these concerns aren't taken seriously in the negotiations.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    But for the negotiations to happen, we have to vote each bill forward. That's why I voted for the Ashby bill, even though I had concerns with it, to make sure those concerns were on the table and in the negotiations. And it's why I will be voting for your bill today to make sure you're at the table doing the same thing. And I really, I'm really sorry. They're just all waiting for me to vote. So I'm going to go over and vote, and I will be back to vote here. Thank you. I appreciate the responses from everybody.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Thank you, Senator. And through the Chair, if I may just add that, as Chair of the Assembly Education Committee, I want to make it clear to members of the public that we will be hearing Senator Ashby's Senate Bill 414. As Chair of the Committee, my recommendation for that bill is to do pass, is to support Senator Ashby's bill so that we can continue these negotiations.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So glad because I supported that bill as well. As Mr. Senator Laird, and it doesn't mean that Senator Laird doesn't come back before the conversations have ended. And he might actually have an opportunity to expand a little bit more if he has more questions, if time permits. Any other questions, comments? Senator Choi, Senator Gonzalez, and Senator Cortese.

  • Steven Choi

    Legislator

    Assembly Member Muratsuchi, thank you for presenting your bill. But as you have seen, I tried to count and I was close to over 200 parents, people came out in opposition to your bill. And to my count, I've been counting this way, only 25 people spoke in support of the bill. Obviously, as you know, the charter school was designed for the purpose of what? Do you know? Can you state why charter school was created?

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Sure. I mean, as your staff report summarizes the history of charter schools, charter schools were founded to allow for basically innovative new approaches using public education dollars to allow for flexibility. But again, you know, the key is using the public dollars. As long as we are going to use public dollars, we want to make sure, I think we should have bipartisan agreement that we want to make sure that public dollars are not being used for fraud.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Like in the case of the A3 charters, where they were taking little league baseball rosters and enrolling the kids without the kids or their parents knowing about it and collecting enrollment based, you know, Proposition 98 public education dollars in funding, over $400 million. So I hope that we have that bipartisan agreement that we have a problem, we need to crack down on it. We need to tighten oversight and accountability.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    And that's exactly what, you know, we are negotiating with Senator Ashby, with all the stakeholders to tighten up so that... You know, some people say that, well, look, you know, A3 charters, they were criminally convicted. And so why do we need more oversight? We need more oversight so that we can prevent these kinds of abuses.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    You know, A3 charters $400 million, Highlands Community Charter just in two fiscal years, over $180 million. We want to prevent these kind of things. You know, our precious public education taxpayer dollars for being used for fraud or for abuse. And that is the goal.

  • Steven Choi

    Legislator

    I totally agree that bad actors that you have illustrated should be punished and prevent from happening in the future. But as you mentioned, charter school was allowed in the beginning for innovative education and also flexibility. But you missed a very important part that was those innovations and flexibility means that the schools, public schools could not do their best job because of too many regulations. That's the reason the charter school was created.

  • Steven Choi

    Legislator

    To be free of so many state regulations. And they can be independent from the school districts and be their own and create education programs innovatively and also personal, meeting the personal needs. And then also education doesn't have to be always classroom based depending upon situation, environment, and also individual needs.

  • Steven Choi

    Legislator

    And as I've been serving on the Assembly, now on the Senate, I have seen any bills relating to charter schools has been continuously creating more regulations away from the original intent of the creation of the charter schools for them to be free and focus upon their academic innovations and the creativity and the flexibility in learning to create a learning environment.

  • Steven Choi

    Legislator

    Obviously no one will approve of public tax dollars to be abused and personal use. And the bad actors you have illustrated should be caught and punished. And SB 414, which will be heading to the Education Committee in the Assembly will be dealt with. That creates very necessary guardrails for public schools to prevent those bad actors.

  • Steven Choi

    Legislator

    The illustration some of the public dollars that has been abused. I am just receiving message from, checking from my staff that you have mentioned that the $400 million was a fraud amount committed by A3 charter schools. Simply my staff members found it was not the case. Yes, they are agreeing.

  • Steven Choi

    Legislator

    Charter brought in $400 million through its network of 19 online charter schools. But the actual fraud you are referring to is only $80 million that the two people funneled into private companies. And since being caught, total amount $240 million has been paid back.

  • Steven Choi

    Legislator

    Now we had one actor in this case that I know of is a bad actor and they are caught and they are being punished and they have paid for it. But because of one of few bad actors, your bill is just choking the original intent of freedom of innovation and flexibility of the charter school character.

  • Steven Choi

    Legislator

    In the beginning that the we have allowed all charter schools, more than 700,000 charter school students are being penalized because of one or two bad actors. Those ones we need to watch out and catch them and prosecute them and penalize them. There's no question.

  • Steven Choi

    Legislator

    But overall, just because of always under no matter what they situation it may be, there are bound to be bad actors. We have red lights, green lights, and we all know that we are supposed to stop at the red light. But some people go through and we try to catch them.

  • Steven Choi

    Legislator

    And that means we should not allow the vehicles on the street. We don't do that. So for that token, I think you need to hear the voices. So far this many people have come up, and then I think you need to stand on the side of students and the parents that they want rather than governmental point of view and catching bad actors and penalize them. And we do have vehicles.

  • Steven Choi

    Legislator

    That's the reason we have mechanism that each school district, authorizing school district will catch them and board members will catch them. Parents can catch them and report them, district attorneys can catch them. And there are multiple ways rather than collectively penalizing all the charter schools. Unfortunately, I would not be able to support and I hope you can change your mind on withdrawing this bill.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Please, no clapping and no responses as we're going through this. I want to make sure that we're able to do this in a timely process. We're already two hours in, so yeah, if you just, we request silence while we're having discussion. Assembly Member Muratsuchi.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Thank you, madam, through the Chair. Thank you, Senator Choi. You know, I would caution anyone on basing policy decisions on the number of people that come out to testify. I suspect that if you survey Californians, there would be strong, overwhelming support to crack down on corruption, to crack down on public education dollars being fraudulently collected by these bad actors.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    We know that it's not just A3, as Mr. Fine... I mean Mr. Fine is the recognized statewide expert on fiscal management, and he testified the decades of calls to strengthen oversight and accountability. So these are not isolated cases. That is what my bill, Senator Ashby's bill, we are in agreement on that principle.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    And I want to acknowledge I agree with you on principle. What we're basically negotiating with my bill and Senator Ashby's bill is how to strike that balance between strengthening oversight and accountability while allowing for necessary flexibility for the good charter schools to continue to operate. And so we are in agreement on somewhere we need to strike that balance. And so that is the goal of the ongoing negotiations.

  • Steven Choi

    Legislator

    Just to add to your response that SB 414 has been agreed upon and supported by Senator colleagues that I spoke to and then also many parents. So I think if you compromise between the two bills and come up with some big amendments.

  • Steven Choi

    Legislator

    I think people will agree with you. To crack down bad actors.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    That is the goal.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Okay, I think next up we have Senator Gonzalez.

  • Lena Gonzalez

    Legislator

    Thank you very much, Madam Chair. And I just want to thank the author and all the parents and all of the supporters, opponents for coming out.

  • Lena Gonzalez

    Legislator

    I know it's not easy to bring your kids over here and have them testify, but I have, as a a mother of a 10 year old, I just really appreciate seeing the children, regardless of what side you're on. But I do want to thank the author.

  • Lena Gonzalez

    Legislator

    I'm a wholehearted supporter of ethics and financial training and ensuring that we uphold taxpayer money to the highest standard and that the officials that are working for, not just the public, but most importantly children, are held to the highest standard.

  • Lena Gonzalez

    Legislator

    In fact, I have a bill up in local government today, SB 827, that asks for ethics and fiscal training of all of our local government officials because I do believe in that. I've had a lot of reports of corruption in my district and so I've lived experience as an elected official.

  • Lena Gonzalez

    Legislator

    I think whether it's $400 million or $80 million, whatever the amount, all I know is it's a lot of money that is not going towards children. Regardless. If you want to take your child to a charter school, a home based or public traditional school, that is a lot of money.

  • Lena Gonzalez

    Legislator

    I actually authored SB 991 back a year or so ago that continued the Inspector General for LA Unified School District as well, to conduct audits, investigations, deter fraud, waste and abuse. So I just want you all to know where I'm coming from as it pertains to this bill. And I do commend the authority.

  • Lena Gonzalez

    Legislator

    It's never easy to tell, especially after, you know this, the daylight opens and you start to see the fraud and abuse again, especially against our children in this really incredible State of California where we are the fifth largest, fourth largest economy.

  • Lena Gonzalez

    Legislator

    Now, we want all of our children, regardless of party affiliation and where you're at, to be well taken care of and respected, as well as the parents that are putting in the work.

  • Lena Gonzalez

    Legislator

    But I think this strikes a good balance and I know you will continue to do that work, to work with our other Senate colleague and to work with supporters and those that are opposed on a good landing space for this bill. I just have a couple questions.

  • Lena Gonzalez

    Legislator

    So just for you, of course, as LA as I represent Los Angeles Unified School District, as do you, and the issue of, you know, additional tasks like auditing and clear guidelines, instructions, et cetera, if the bill should get out of Committee, today, what will you do to ensure, as the author, that authorizers are meaningfully involved in the conversations moving forward?

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Yes, I thank you, Senator, first of all, for your leadership and wanting to ensure that taxpayer dollars are properly spent.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    I want to emphasize not only your bill to call for the Inspector General for Los Angeles Unified or, you know, AB 84, which is calling for a statewide Inspector General, that Inspector General would strengthen oversight over all publicly funded schools, not only charter schools, but our traditional public schools.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    In terms of your question, I think you're touching on some of the concerns raised by our school administrators in terms of the authorizer concerns that they raise. It's my understanding that the primary concern that the authorizers are raising are in terms of the need for more funding to do their jobs.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    And so our original bill was proposing to allow the authorizers to collect, you know, a higher oversight fee from the charter school in order to be able to do their job.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Because, you know, as we're seeing at the Federal Government level, you know, when you cut those whose jobs it is to oversee these agencies, then, you know, bad things happen. And so we want to make sure that the oversight, the authorizers who have the oversight responsibility have the necessary resources to be able to do their job.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    But we took that amendment because the charter school Association said, you know, that's going to increase cost to operate charters. So, you know, in the spirit of negotiating with the Charter School Association, we had to compromise on that point. So now, you know, no good deed goes unpunished.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    We, you know, in the spirit of good faith negotiation, we took that amendment on the Assembly side. And now we have our school administrators, you know, expressing concerns that they're not going to have the resources necessary to do their oversight responsibilities. But that's what that is all about.

  • Lena Gonzalez

    Legislator

    Thank you and I appreciate that. Once again, I know that you are going to work very hard at it's never easy to appease all sides, but I really appreciate that work and the answer you've provided.

  • Lena Gonzalez

    Legislator

    And just a question, if I may, through the chair and the author to the opposition on, you know, teacher credentialing is very important. I would like to know what is the what is stopping folks from getting a teaching credential?

  • Lena Gonzalez

    Legislator

    I know it's cumbersome, but I think most of the teachers that are in charters as well as public traditional schools often have, you know, masters or PhDs or some sort of formal education. So just a true question to the opposition as to why teaching credentials are sort of off the table.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    I don't think that's not to my knowledge, teaching credentials is not at issue in this round. The laws were amended some years ago to mandate that all charter school teachers must hold a credential. There was a phase in of that. The phase in is now complete as of this current school year.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    And charter schools face the same teaching credential challenges that the entire system faces, and in particular, shortages in areas particularly math, science, special ed, English learner support, et cetera. Those are the primary issues that we now have over credentialing.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    And I think there were some issues over other credentials, but I believe those have been brought off the table and we're still doing some technical cleanup on.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    That through the chair. If I may, I believe, Senator Gonzales, what you're referring to is our bill that requires that a credentialed teacher has to approve how the enrichment vouchers that some of these homeschool based charters are issuing to homeschool parents. And that is a difference between AB 84 and SB 414.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    You know, just according to the Assembly Education Committee analysis of SB 414. Their language simply would require education agencies, schools, school districts to vet vendors through policies ensuring safety, value and qualifications.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    You know, so without defining, you know, what constitutes safety, value and qualifications, you know, we're trying to set the standard saying, okay, you know, public education dollars need to be approved by credentialed teachers. They're approaching it with, you know, these undefined, you know, requirements that vendors be approved to ensure safety, value and qualifications. We're negotiating.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    How do we try to find common ground between those two that, you know, they're saying that it's overly restrictive, that credentialed employees have to approve the use of enrichment vouchers. We're saying, well, you know, these are public dollars, public education dollars. There should be some, you know, gatekeepers of standards. That's what we're negotiating right now.

  • Lena Gonzalez

    Legislator

    And thank you for the follow up. I was going to ask for a follow up, but if you would like to respond, love to hear.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    Yeah, I misunderstood your question. Our bill does require that the charter school boards adopt a policy that requires credentialed teacher to sign off on enrichment spending. We object to the term vouchers. You know, we don't see these as vouchers, but our bill does require exactly that. Please look at the language in Section 43.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    You will not see anything here about teacher sign off.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    Okay.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    Okay. That's part of why negotiations can be difficult. But I think our bill clearly does exactly what he says his bill does. This Bill AB 84 doesn't do what Assembly Member Muratsuchi is saying that it does. And we need to get that kind of clarity. We're at table, we're willing happy to negotiate this and it's in our bill.

  • Lena Gonzalez

    Legislator

    Thank you very much. I appreciate the responses on both sides and thank you again for bringing this forward. I support the bill.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Thank you. Thank you, Senator Gonzalez. I also just want to make a comment. I understand that there's two bills in this space, but I do want to be very clear that we're discussing AB 84 and just want to remind the Members of the Committee of that as well.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    And if it's referenced, I want it to be in context to AB 84.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Thank you, Senator Cortese.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    Thank you for that clarification, Madam Chair. In the opportunity to ask a couple of questions, I think we have a long standing policy here in the Senate that we don't negotiate amendments from the dais and we're just kind of wasting our time, you know, talking about things that need to be in the Bill that aren't on the table today at any length.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    And in the time I've been here, I've heard the last issue brought up at least a half a dozen times. You know, that shouldn't go on ad infinitum. So I, I'll leave it to the chair, but that's my feeling about that.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    So I've had the opportunity, of course, to prepare and vote on a Senate Bill in this space, to meet with the author of this bill and, and his staff and, and go over whatever questions I had, you know, recently and then to meet with one of the charter schools, charter school organizations, which is in opposition in my district at some length just before last weekend, it seems like their concerns, which I asked them to document in memorandum form and I did my best to take notes at the time mental notes especially are resolved.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    And I just want to make sure with the author that that's true. They were concerned about the public code provisions, but I understand that that's been removed, so that's not a concern anymore.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    I understand going back and forth just over the last 24 hours with staff that there's some concern in my district about the transition to the SACS accounting system, but that hasn't come up in negotiations or has it? Can you just clarify that as the author?

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Yes. So SACS, I, I.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    The concern was standing that up in short order. Yeah. In addition to, I think cost is a common thread through everything we do here. But standing it up and how soon does it have to be done? Was raised as an issue.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    So the basic issue is that we're trying to achieve parity in terms of how traditional public schools and charter schools are reviewed and audited using the SACS system.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    The concern as I understand it, being raised from some of the charter schools, not all, you know, because there are many, again, good charter schools that are already using accounting software that is compatible with the SACS system. But there are some, you know, charter schools that may be using like, you know, the. What is it? QuickBooks.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Yeah, QuickBooks. That it may be cheaper. But we're saying, well, you know, if you're going to be receiving, you know, millions of dollars to that we should have parity in terms of, you know, ensuring the same oversight. If I may, Mr. Fine can speak to that.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    I'm mainly concerned about the. Let me just stipulate on my part. I mean just one member here is going to be casting a vote that I'm in favor of alignment and I don't know how to even call it parity. I just think people need to be on one system.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    And I was on a very large public school board years ago which had seven feeder districts coming into High School District, all in different systems. The biggest problem with that was the detriment to the students themselves because things couldn't be tracked. I know this is primarily accounting.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    My real question then is if I'm for it, what's a realistic ramp up time, you know, to give people to comply on something like this? I'm not an expert on either it or setting up new accounting systems, but just seems that there should be some reasonableness there.

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    Senator, in the amendments the time period was extended out charter schools. I would share with you sacs the standardized account code structures the state common system for actually gets confused. It's a common classification and a system both. We kind of interchange the word to describe both.

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    For all LEAs in the state, they all ultimately report to the State Department of Education using sacs. The difference is some charters, many charters elect to use what we call the alternative form. So they're not on the state web based system. They submit their data in a more summarized form.

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    Some of the answers to questions from a policy perspective, from an oversight perspective, we're looking for more detail. And so as a traditional LEA would be providing that system is free, there's no cost to it. There's nothing in this Bill that requires them to change, whether it's QuickBooks or their back office provider.

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    You heard from some of those folks testify today or whatever system they're using, they can continue to use that. They just have to convert the data and submit it to the state in the more robust SAC system as opposed to the alternative, the more summarized alternative form.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    So you know, on the, on the theme of costs, my impression is that we have a lot of, we have a lot of charters that are operating on extraordinarily thin margins, which in and of itself scares the hell out of me. But that said, this is not an anti charter bill or charter critique bill.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    It's a, if we want them to do something new and they're, you know, they have a very thin margin to operate on, you know what's reasonable, somebody's got to do that work. And I know you said it's free. How labor intensive?

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    Well, the state doesn't charge. The state certainly doesn't charge for the system and access you've appropriated the funds.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    In your estimation, how labor intensive is?

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    Well, because they all ultimately report at a high level in that they're somewhat familiar or their back office, if I can use more generic term, their bookkeeper kind of business office function is familiar with it. I would say there's definitely a cost to them locally to get up to speed with the added details.

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    The system is very strong, fairly straightforward for those that use it every day. If you're a back office provider, a professional service that provides a service to charters, you are absolutely up to speed.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    So you feel that the, you feel that the time, the amended time is adequate?

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    I do. With it being to your point, the amended time, the extended time. Yes.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    And I would hope I'll probably just ask this universally to the author when I get the end of a couple more questions and I just have a couple more as to whether the author is willing to continue to have that dialogue down the stretch here in terms of just ramp up time. What's real.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    We have a whole variety of entities out there. Like I said, I don't want a stereotype.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    But just from what I've heard from one of the more robust ones in our district, in my district, Senate District 15, hearing the concerns about how much any one of these issues would be a tipping point for them into insolvency just is scary and probably belies other challenges and problems.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    But that said, the teacher credentialing issue, I thought everybody here agreed, is a non issue because that was also brought up within the last five days to me as a problem. So if it's a problem, it's. I don't want to put words in anybody's mouth.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    But it sounds like if there's continued use of non-credentialed personnel that should be in the process of being phased out or should have already been changed. It's nothing in that, there's nothing in this bill that's going to raise a credentialing standard for a charter beyond what is already in statute. Is that, is that accurate?

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    Let me just keep. That is accurate. The author. Okay, thank you. I wanted to acknowledge the fact that folks on the panel spoke to that as well. Lastly, shifting gears a little bit from the charter conversation.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    I had, you know, face to face going over things, authorizers, I don't know, some of you, how much, you know, you've had the opportunity to engage them thus far on this bill in terms of negotiation. I don't know who could speak to that beyond the author. But I, I'm curious about that.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    And let me, let me just say, I guess what I'm interested in is to the extent there needs to be more conversations that that will occur. Clearly you're having a separate hearing in your own Committee. You know, I guess my question is, is that an opportunity to hear more?

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    Is that something you will do, not just as an author, but as a chair, to make sure that the authorizers themselves can get the rest of their concerns on the table in a negotiation?

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Absolutely. I mean, we are having ongoing twice a week negotiations with all stakeholders, including Senator Ashby's office, including the charter school Association, and those conversations will continue. As to your earlier point about the concern about the tipping point about the cost of, you know, complying with, requiring all charter schools to comply with SACS.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Again, the bottom line is the spirit of our negotiations is that we want to crack down on the bad actors without hurting the good actors. So, you know, in that spirit, we will continue to ensure that, you know, to negotiate that, you know, the cost burdens would not shut down the good.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    Act of charter schools, I believe your bill, in the various enforcement and accountability items in your bill need to occur. I think, you know, I want to really focus my last comment here on the authorizers. I think they need every opportunity to, you know, sort of finalize a negotiation.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    It's, it's uncommon at every level of education in my experience, over too long probably that as soon as you say we need you to do something else, no matter how simple that looks, you know, provide safe parking space in your open parking lot, you know, we, we need money. We need money for that. So I get it.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    I'm not here trying to do somebody's bidding and say, get them more money because there's more cost. To the contrary, I do. When I look at, you know, what they're being required to do, I think there are a couple of few things that. That could genuinely be characterized as new.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    But I also think, and it disappoints me, that there's a whole bunch of what they're being asked to do that they should have already been doing. And it falls under fiduciary duty. It falls under basic accountability. We have elected officials on school boards.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    What this tells me is if they have not been doing this and they're coming in saying, yeah, well, we haven't been doing this, so help us. Give us some financial help to do that and give us some structure and teach us how to do this. My God, since 1992, this is what's been going on.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    And it was predicted by people, including some of the folks who are in support today in 2025, that, you know, if you don't have enough accountability and we go into this charter experiment, which is supposed to, as one of the Senators said, is supposed to inform restructuring and constructive change in the traditional public school system.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    But if you don't have accountability and oversight and the original bills didn't call for that, and folks don't exercise their fiduciary responsibility, whether they're at the Superintendent's level or the Superintendent's cabinet level or the school board Members themselves, all hell is going to break loose eventually.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    And I think to some degree, we've started to see hell breaking loose here. And it bothers the hell out of me that even on the authorizer side, as much as I'm adamant that they need to be addressed, their issues need to be addressed.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    I hope you, as the author will assert to whatever you're comfortable, those items, those things, those responsibilities that they should have been doing in the first place, we're running school districts. There's not any additional overhead to keep the lights on, the copy machines going, the administrative staff going, the clerical staff going. That's all.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    That's all up and running. It's really a question of are you going to sign off on charter renewals without doing your due diligence, or are you going to do your due diligence at some level? And I don't want to make it sound like I'm othering people in other places, other districts.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    I. I know for a fact that happens in my own district. It happens in my own district, you know, a sort of a rubber stamping of a reauthorization or renewal.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    And so I have sympathy for on the resource issue, but I don't think we should be led to believe that these responsibilities weren't in many cases already required just by basic, basic California law. And the same thing goes for things like gift of public funds. Those laws are on the books.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    There's many things that you're requiring here, which is why I'm supporting the bill, which essentially encapsulates multiple statutes and responsibilities and duties that are already out there that are just not held in one place at this moment. So thank you for your leadership bringing it forward. I'll be an aye vote.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    I hope the rest of negotiation goes well.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Senator Cortese, I know we have a representative from KA that I think wanted to speak a little bit to the concerns that you're raising. Did you want for her to just provide a bit more technical kind of feedback? And yes.

  • Sara Pietrowski

    Person

    Thank you, Madam Chair Members. Sara Petrowski, on behalf of the California Association of School Business Officials and representing the coalition of authorizers who signed the concern letter, I just wanted to take the opportunity to say we are happy to engage in the discussions of the negotiations.

  • Sara Pietrowski

    Person

    We have not yet been invited to those, but would be happy to articulate those concerns if we are able to do so. Thank you so much. Thank you.

  • Dave Cortese

    Legislator

    Thank you. Through the chair. That was my primary, primary point. It sounds like that's going to happen. Thank you.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Great. Next up we have Senator Ochoa Bogh.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Thank you and welcome, everyone. So, so much, so much, so much so. It's interesting because obviously you're very endeared by many of the folks here in the Senate as the chair of education, because there's just so many issues, so many concerns and so much opposition either way.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And it's interesting to note, I just want to note from the very top that with amendments, you usually see people, you know, neutralized or coming on board. And with the journey that you've had with this particular bill, I've noticed that you've had people come off of support or in opposition with the additional amendments.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So what it what a tough bill, I think. Let me begin by saying that obviously, as with any system in government, we need to have oversight, we need to have accountability and transparency. I'm huge on all those areas on many, many fronts.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And when it comes to our audits that we, that we, that the state provides or that moves forward with many a times, it's been my experience these past five years in the Senate that we don't always do what the audit's Recommendations are they don't implement, we don't implement every single or the departments don't implement every single.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And I actually asked once before in one of my committees as to why that was not the case.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Why is it that we don't get the, you know, we pay for these audits and then you think that every Department would eventually just look at those and just say, okay, we're going to make these modifications and implement those audit recommendations.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And it was also interesting to note or to mention on that, on that front that when I asked why those recommendations weren't always implemented, it was because then it would be the control, the auditors, the audit controller's office to be directing and administrating those departments.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So it was up to the Legislature one to cherry pick which ones they wanted to implement and then codify them in bills and through the Legislature. So that was interesting to note.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So I just wanted to put that on the record because that is standard here and that is standard practice for the Legislature, which I did not know that, but it was very enlightening.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So as we have conversations as to, you know, who's cherry picking what, the Legislature does that and they do that and they codify what they believe is important and the Legislature passes that. So right off the bat I wanted to mention that I also wanted to address.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So I have, I'm going to start with my formal, my official list of questions. So I'm going to start with those really quick and those comments and then I'll go with with additional ones based on the comments that were that were given here.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And I'm going to try to avoid the ones that have already been addressed because I don't want to be redundant and for essence of time. So since 2020, California has invested approximately $4 billion in in Expanded Learning Opportunities Program or ELAP, which supports tutoring and enrichment for K6 students in site based programs.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Importantly, ELAP allows enrichments to be delivered by community based organizations and non credentialed providers, which by the way, three Members here from that Committee supported that allocation of funding. And for those programs, students in non classroom based charter schools are already excluded from ELAP funding or the expanded learning opportunities programs.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    AB 84 would go even further by prohibiting those same students from accessing community based enrichment altogether. That raises serious concerns with equity. And so with that in mind, has there been any conversations or considerations with regards to addressing that concern with our students in charter schools in this bill particularly?

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Yes. Thank you Senator for your question. I know I've heard that from A lot of the homeschool parents that I've met with and spoken with. Let me first say that the enrichment funds that are at issue in AB 84, they are public education dollars that are being allocated for instruction. They're not allocated for enrichment.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    These are core LCFF Prop $98 that were not set aside like the ELAP program for before, after school or summer enrichment activities. These are core educational dollars that are supposed to be spent on instructional minutes. So why are these homeschool parents not benefiting from the dollars being actually spent on educational minutes?

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    That is one of the issues being raised with this bill. They are trying to get around that by characterizing this as enrichment funds, when in fact, those dollars, you know, they're not ELAP dollars. They are LCFF dollars that are intended to teach kids the curriculum.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    And so, you know, clearly when you try to take away something that parents are receiving, that creates a big uproar. And that's the reason why we have this huge turnout of people that are focusing on this issue. But at the very least, we're trying to set up guardrails so that we should all be able to agree.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    You can't, you know, whether we characterize them as LCFF dollars or whether we try to analogize them to ELAP dollars, the bottom line is we should all be able to agree that, you know, public taxpayer dollars should not be spent to buy Disneyland passes, especially for the parents, you know, or they shouldn't, they shouldn't be used to, to pay parents to teach their kids, you know.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Ooh, yeah, on that point, be very, very cautious on that end because we have another segment of community members who care for their loved ones in a healthcare facility that we as a state provide funding for so that they can be home and actually provide for them, rather than having them in facilities paid by the state.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And it actually, there's a lot of conversations in which they advocate that they don't get paid enough in order to do that job. So there's other facilities where, you know, the state is providing for family members to care for their loved ones in a capacity so that the state does not take that responsibility.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    But the key difference there is that we are specifically allocating dollars for in home supportive services. You know, here we're not paying parents who are not trained, who are not credentialed, you know, to be teaching. And so that's. It's what the purpose and the intent of the funds are for.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    That's ultimate, ultimately. And though I agree with you, here's another Scenario that you might also consider within that perspective is that our schools do field trips. They take kids to Magic Mountain and they. And they pay for the chaperones to be able to attend the schools. They. They don't. Is it very. It's my experience that they do.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    It is my experience that they do.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    As well, that they maybe charter schools are, but I don't know of any traditional schools or what's that.

  • Unidentified Speaker

    Person

    It's my experience that this occurs in both charter and traditional school.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Well, according to the L. A Times, you know, we just read an article that came out several years ago, maybe, well, now it's probably about five years ago in which they actually specified that particular component that schools, public schools do pay for these field trips for students to go there and for the chaperones.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    But the technicalities on that and depending on various. Various schools, you know, but we do have schools that do pay for these extracurricular activities to go. And you know, with this particular, you know, with ELAP funding, there's also the opportunities that are getting paid to have enrichment opportunities that don't have credentialed teachers.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    That aside, that aside, we do have, and I do appreciate the point in which we have credentialed teachers authorizing how and what enrichment activities are being provided within the school. So it has to have an academic component to it. I remember, you know, going on field trips to Magic Mountain and it had to have a mathematical component.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    They had to have fill out a paperwork of, you know, what it is, you know, what the rides, the speed and the distance. And, you know, there were all these little things that they had to figure out on it. So very light. But enough to say this was an academic support, an academic enrichment opportunity.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    There are programs where they're trying to find funding, well, for various enrichment opportunities, all within educational. And we all know that you can find an educational component rationalization for many, many programs even going camping, even going to Disneyland. What's that?

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    I mean, some people would argue that there's educational value in going to Disneyland.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Yes.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    For the parents paying for the parents to go.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Okay, so from that end. So I just wanted to make some comparisons on that point. So I'm not going to touch the authorizers because I think we've already spoken to that to that point. Let's see, we've talked about the statewide structure supporting charter authorization. I believe Senator Cortese has already touched up on that point. Right.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So I'm not going to. I'm not going to go there. Okay, so here's another one That I don't think we have actually touched on. So the bill places severe restrictions on the ability of any school district with less than 10,000 students from authorizing new charter public schools.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    I think restricting the development of high quality schools is not good policy, period. And I think that's. That goes against the very core of why charter schools began as stated by Dr. Choi. But I have a couple of questions about this provision.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    I know that the LAO and FCMAT report recommended that limits on district on district authorizing be set based on district size grade. Again, a policy that I don't agree with necessarily. Well, I know that the authorizer for A3 was small. The authorizer for Highland Charter School was above 10,000 students.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So it does not appear to me, based on these two cases, that the size of the district is actually the data point we should be using for any restrictions. I have two questions. One. Has there been any considerations because we're not going to negotiate here, so I'm going to rephrase this.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Has there been any considerations or conversations with. Regarding to addressing this particular section of the bill and potentially introducing it, perhaps, you know, or addressing it later when it has had more opportunity to be, or when they have a comprehensive study conducted on what makes a good authorizer and tie any restrictions to that particular component?

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    We are having ongoing negotiations about, you know, how do we get the job done.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    The bottom line is, as Senator Cortese was saying earlier, we want to make sure that the authorizers have the resources and the capacity to, to be able to do their job, which is to ensure that taxpayer dollars are being spent on public education in this case.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    So whether it's addressing the intent to say that districts can't be authorizing charter schools that are bigger than the districts themselves, the basic idea behind that is ensuring they have the capacity to do their job.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    So whether it's, you know, having size limits or whether, you know, we're having conversations about whether there should be a statewide, you know, authorizer for non classroom based charters, for the oversight of the non classroom based charters. We're exploring all options. But the spirit of the negotiations is how do we get the job done?

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    How do we, you know, we should have bipartisan, again, we should have bipartisan support to make sure that the authorizers that are charged with overseeing the charter schools have the resources and the capacity to do their job.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Oh, I don't, I don't disagree on that point at all. Yeah. Okay. So the other question I have for you is what is the data or evidence that was used to set the restrictive provisions at less than 10,000 students.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    I ask because I have school districts smaller than that in my district and I believe do an excellent job in authorizing an oversight.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    I would turn to Mr. Fine or Ms. Mancini.

  • Cassandra Mancini

    Person

    Yeah, absolutely. I think that the.

  • Cassandra Mancini

    Person

    In our conversations with many small district authorizers, they came to us and said, hey, we think we're doing a good job, which is why amendments were added to the bill in the Assembly that said that if you have certain number of staff, I think it's four staff members who have experience in business services, special education and the like.

  • Cassandra Mancini

    Person

    Basically, if you can prove you have the staff capacity to do this work, that you can continue to authorize your large non-classroom based charter schools.

  • Cassandra Mancini

    Person

    So I think that's what we want to move to in negotiations, a way of figuring out which authorizers have the capacity, have proven that they can do this work and do this work well. But that's certainly, I think, the direction we're going. And the 10,000 number I think was based on the LAO Figma report.

  • Cassandra Mancini

    Person

    And we thought it was a good judge at first kind of that establishing that 100% threshold. If you, for example, are a school district of 7,000, then you could authorize up to 100% of your ADA at 7,000. But as you said, Highlands proved to us that this problem is pervasive across authorizers of all sizes.

  • Cassandra Mancini

    Person

    And we want to make sure we tackle that and are responsive to that issue.

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    And Senator, I would add that fundamentally a school district's capacity, especially in its business office, looks very different at around 5000 ADA, moving from almost one person that wears multiple hats in the business office to multiple people. Organizationally it starts to look different at roughly 5,000.

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    In fact, we offer a professional development program for LEAs at 5,000 and below just because of that, because one person wears lots of hats versus multiple people. But at the same time, we believe that 5,000 benchmark was likely too low here. And so that's in part where the 10,000 comes from. It really all gets back to capacity.

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    And if there's a proxy for capacity other than ADA, and amendments in the Assembly as just indicated, begin to address that. The Assembly Members indicated, you know, we've looked at other state models, many other states, especially when it comes to non classroom base, there's one authorizer and one oversight agency in the whole state.

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    California, as you know, was on the leading edge of the charter Schools act when it was passed many decades ago. Other states followed and thus learned some lessons and may even have some better practices in place. So all of that is part of this.

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    The other piece, and I think this gets back to capacity that the bill begins to address, is support for authorizers. And we're interchanging terms authorizers and oversight. Right. If you're an authorizer, you are tasked with oversight. Right. Just so there's no clarity that they're meant to be different. The Legislature's been very clear.

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    Oversight comes as an obligation of authorizing a petition, a charter petition. So there's a variety of pieces in the Bill that I think try to get to that without setting a. Firm. Limit purely based on ADA.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Okay, thank you for the clarification. Okay. So the other thing is, another area that I'm always concerned here in the Legislature is that we're always expanding and growing different departments and agencies because they're not currently doing the job well. And we think that, oh, let's start this new organization. And it just keeps expanding, expanding.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And what I've seen is that as it gets bigger, there's less accountability in the sense that you kind of shuffle the responsibility to one or another person, and then it just keeps going, and then you don't, you know, it gets lost.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And so my concern with the particular Bill with AB 84 is also the establishment of the two new bureaucracies, what deemed as bureaucracy, particularly in the context of the very difficult budget decisions that we've had this year. And let me start with the Office of Inspector General that would be housed in the California Department of Education.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    One comparison for this new office is probably the Office of Inspector General we currently have in place for the Department of Corrections. That budget is approximately $42 million, which I think roughly, with. I think based on the data that we have, has about 200 staff.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Do you expect that this new Office of Inspector General at the Department of Education would be the same or even larger, given the size of the Tk 12 education budget and the number of school districts and charter schools that would be under its purview.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Thank you, Senator. I, you know, given that this is the Policy Committee and not the Fiscal Committee, I did not.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Oh, I apologize.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    I'm looking at the Assembly Appropriations Committee analysis, and I don't see. I don't know if. Mr. Fine. Okay.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    You can get that to me at a later time. I know I caught you off guard. If you're not prepared, which I'll. We can. I can make my. My final comments soon, and we can address that. I didn't mean to put you on the spot like that.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    No, no.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So let me go on with my part. D while you're looking. I'm not sure if you'd be able to process both. Oh here. Oh, here. Okay.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    The Assembly Appropriations Committee estimates ongoing General Fund costs of an unknown but potentially significant amount, likely in the low millions of dollars to low tens of millions of dollars, to establish and staff the Office of Inspector General under the supervision of the State Board of Education.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    That's interesting. I mean, comparison to the Department of Public Safety. Consider the fact that it is smaller than our number of educators. So I wonder if that is accurate based on what we currently have already in practice.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So I would take a second look on that and just take a little closer look on whether or not that would be an accurate amount.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And then the second part of this question is I'm trying to understand the need for the establishment of the new organization in the context of all the existing organizations that currently provide assistance to charter school authorizers.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    I'm thinking of the National Association of Charter School Authorizers and the California Charter Authorizing Professionals, to name but two of such organizations. Secondly, can you provide more details on the creation of the new statewide organization to assist authorizers? What would be the size and the budget of the new authorizer assistance organization? Have you folks?

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And you're probably not prepared for that.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    One either, actually, But I believe Mr. Fine may be prepared to answer.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Okay, perfect.

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    Senator, this actually comes from. And your staff report speaks to this from a very successful federal grant that. And I'm sorry, I'm going to lose a little bit of timeline here, but that was hosted in the Alameda County Office of Ed called the CarsNet California Authorizers Resource Network. And I believe it ended seven years ago.

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    Six or seven years ago, the federal grant ran out. And what you see in the Bill actually was a request of FCMAT to make a proposal to keep it going almost seven years ago. And you see that almost word for word in AB84, the proposal we wrote back then. We don't have any.

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    I'm perfectly fine without any additional duties, but we're also happy to host that effort. What is it is envisioned to be 22 and a half people, one of which is clerical, because that network is just that. It is a network of authorizers that come together and talk about best practices. And so it's a.

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    The workload is divided out among them. So it's really a coordinating role. If we follow the CARSNET example, which was what our intent was, it's really a coordinating role and a sponsor of an annual conference type of thing where everybody can come together and now learn about the work that's been done. You are right.

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    It builds in partnership with some of those other organizations. I caution us about the national organization because it is national, not California specific. Right. But the California Authorizers Professional Group does a great job. They were part of this effort to start with. Carsnet, FCMAT was part of it. A number of agencies were part of it.

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    And so that's really what it's a coordinating effort of bringing all those parties together and building best practices and then publishing those best practices as resources for authorizers. That's what was envisioned. It needed some structure and so that's. Why. We offered to kind of put it under us.

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    But it is also important for us to have a little bit of separation in the rest of the work we do because we are tasked with fraud reviews on occasion and we want to make sure we're not overlapping in responsibilities and that there's a bit of a firewall.

  • Michael Fine

    Person

    That's why we created a little bit of the bureaucracy of a separate board than what statute already provides for FCMAPS Board itself, just to have a little bit of separation there. But key is it's a coordinating role of, for lack of a better term, of Members, although we didn't envision it as a membership organization.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Okay, thank you, sir, for that. Gives a little more context as to what was going. What was the thought process or the context there were.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Now, I'm going to go on and just express some thoughts and some comments in the overall, I won't be supporting the Bill today and I've shared that with you prior to the Committee hearing just because I do have a lot of concerns.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    You know, it's interesting when you, as I mentioned earlier, when you see so many, you know, when you see amendments coming in and everybody's working through and I know our consultants here have been working extremely hard to, you know, carry this across. I'm sure you won't have a problem getting it across today through Committee.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    But I do want to express some concerns because when we see amendments coming through and people are working towards these bills, normally you see people either coming off or becoming neutral, very concerned about the fact that there's a lot of concern from various fronts, including many folks that came to our office and expressed concerns with the Bill and expressed that many of them had not had an opportunity to actually talk about concerns that they've had.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And so, and I know you're shaking your head, you don't believe that's the case. But these are folks that have been here at previous Bill hearings and they're expressing their concerns. I have no reason not to believe or take their word for it, but they feel that they haven't been heard yet and haven't had an opportunity.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Not to say that that's not going to happen in the negotiations moving forward. But, but it is my job and my duty to express the concerns that were expressed from folks that visited our office. And that's what I'm doing today. I'm expressing their concerns.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And so when you see amendments coming in and of course not neutralizing or adding support, it's kind of baffling. It's a little bit of, you know, it's discerning a little bit on that end. And being that there's a lot of issues that are still very, very much open.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    In any other Bill you would see authors being asked to make this a two year Bill to continue that work in those conversations, right? Many, many. Especially when it's this big and there's so much opposition to it.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And it was interesting to note that even in the end of our notes here, we said we have a comment here that says these Committee amendments are not intended to reflect a final agreement between all parties. And several provisions remained the subject of disagreement.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    However, they represent a meaningful step toward in the negotiation process and are being requested by the Committee as a demonstration of good faith and continued progress. And that's what we see that is going on with the Committee hearing with these amendments and this Committee hearing.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    But it is the last hearing, the last education hearing that we're having this year. And by now, you know, we're, you know, unless there's a special, you know.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Those speakers about last hearing. What's that? Yeah, might have some more of it.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Yeah, we might have some more. You know, we might have. But, but technically this is our last one. And so being that it is our last and there's still so many loose ends and open ended concerns still working on it, you know, you'd think that you would see this as a two year Bill.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And so that's, I'm not going to, that's why I'm not going to support the Bill today. And based on the lot of concerns that many of our constituents have had, I mean, I cannot tell you how many calls we received and concerns on how it's going to impact their ability to address their education of their children. And I think that's incredibly concerning. But having said that, final comments.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    I just want to make a reference to Some of the statements that were made here today and that was whether or not how these funds are being used with regards to extracurricular or how they're being used and what type of education these students are having or providing or these parents are providing for their students.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And I'm not sure that many folks know this, but there was, there was an article. Oh, I just lost it. Give me one second. And I thought it was interesting because I'm going to bring it up because the question of, you know, if they're giving religious education of some sort to these kids, you know, and using tax dollars.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    But I want to just really quickly highlight a legal finding that came out in, I believe it was May, and this is what came out. It says California will now allow public school public funds to pay for students with learning disabilities to attend religious private schools, marking a major shift in long standing state policy.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    The change follows a court settlement reached May 19 between state officials and a group of Orthodox Jewish parents who had challenged the state's exclusion of a religious schools from its funding program.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Since 1993, California law has permitted the use of public funds to cover the cost of private school education for students with disabilities, but not at non sectarian institutions.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    The the requirement was declared unconstitutional by a federal judge after the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in October that the law appeared to violate the First Amendment guarantee of religious freedom.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Why I bring this finding out is because as we're having or you're having continuous conversations with regard to this Bill as to what is being covered and not covered and challenges are being made with regards to the type of education that these kids are having through charter schools, through home school programs, I think it's something to be, because I think this is going to go further.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And so as we're making, you know, what's appropriate, what you know, we can't use these tax funded dollars for certain types of education, especially if they have a religious undertone into it.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    I want to caution because I think it's going to be challenged and based on these findings, I think that we're going to see a change in the way that educational funding is being awarded to education in General in California. And so I wanted to bring that up.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    The other comment that I wanted to bring up and highlight was the abuses that are happening in charter schools and whether or not they're legitimate or not. And I just want to point out that in California we've allocated about $130 billion in educational funding for public schools this year, probably a little less than that.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    In 2025-26, $114.6 billion. Prop 98 K through 12 is some as we're looking as you know, when we're talking about the fraud that's going on and so forth. There are many, many Californians, you know, when you talk about whether or not they would approve accountability and transparency, I would say absolutely every Californian, the majority of calorie would be not 100%, all 100% into accountability and transparency.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    But when we're talking about educational funding, in this case, you're addressing public school or charter schools and you know, the examples are coming out. I want to highlight that public schools right now in California have a, you know, have about for English language arts, have about a 40% reading and writing at grade level.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    In math and science, we're at 30%, 30.7% going up. And we're talking about literally $130 billion in our educational system that's going on. So I'm not sure that the majority of Californians would agree that that is absolutely accountable, transparent and acceptable.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And so charter schools may have some nefarious actors which thank goodness they've been, you know, found out and are being addressed the courts and being penalized.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    But I want to make sure that, you know, we put into context into why these schools are important and in our state, because when you look at those and you're looking at the amount of money that we're spending and the output, the outcome that we have in our students, it's unacceptable. It is absolutely unacceptable.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And when we're looking at these parents who are desperate and want something completely different, few bad apples shouldn't compromise their ability to have choice, and not just choice, but actually have proven that they can have a better educational outcome.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And whether or not it means that a parent facilitates that education, even though they don't have a degree, even though they don't have a degree, how many folks and how much do we advocate for schools to accept other life experiences to say, hey, you've had these life experiences, we're going to allow you to have this credential, the certificate.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    How many folks do we encourage to go through YouTube and learn, you know, how to do X, Y and Z? So just because parents don't necessarily have a credential doesn't mean that they can't facilitate education.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And sometimes based on the ones that I personally have encountered and met, are doing a beautiful and wonderful job including family Members and my future son in law who is homeschooled. So I just want to make that very, very clear, that as we're going forward, and we, you know, we talk about the.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    The accountability for charter schools and homeschool programs, many of these folks are just looking for an alternative. And let's look at our public school system and our scores on that end. That is also unacceptable in the State of California. So, having said that, I will respectfully be voting no, and I share that with you.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    But I look forward to continuous conversations, and I look forward to continue to work in this Committee on behalf of all of our students.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Thank you, Senator.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Thank you, Senator Ochoa Bogh please, no clapping. Thank you. Thank you. Appreciate the hand waves. I will turn it over now to Senator Cabaldon.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    Thank you, Madam Chair. And I'm just to set expectations. I'm going to make everybody angry about this, about this Bill, but that's kind of the nature of this topic. Every charter school Bill turns out this way in part because they're all kind of existential.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    And I know this both from my own experience here and on the campaign trail. I know there are folks who believe charter schools should not exist at all, and many of them are supporters of this Bill. I know there are others that think that we should have unfettered charters to do anything, anytime, anywhere.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    And I know they're among the opponents of the Bill. But in both cases, I hope they are smaller. And I'm not going to go into lots and lots of detailed provisions, because a lot of the questions that I had have already been asked by other Members of the Committee, but also because this is a negotiation that is happening. And. And I concur with the chair's admonition about the SB414.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    But it is also the case that we're highly unlikely to use the joint rule of provision that expects that in these kind of situations, we would have a conference Committee. So this is the best that we get. And when we advanced SB414, it was. We did very little debate here in order to be ready for this moment.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    So they are being negotiated together. They will need to be a package, in my view, if it's going to move forward. That said, I think first I wanted to just sort of emphasize the importance of some humility about this issue.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    The Chair will get mad at me because I bring this up all the time, but, you know, 35% of. I was going to say students, but applicants to the community colleges are not real people. You know, we are not, like, perfect in state government either, when it comes to massive fraud and financial exposure.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    And I'm old enough to remember when FCMAT didn't exist? And I represent a city that just this month is coming out of its final bankruptcy payments because the Vallejo Unified School District made a lot of very bad financial decisions.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    And so when I say that, because, you know, I know that the debate has kind of been caricatured around Disneyland or whatever and it's like, zero, did you know that they are paying for somebody to go to Disneyland?

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    And I'm like, yeah, but did you know that my school district entered into permanent long term contracts that they could never possibly afford and have cost students an annual, you know, thousands of dollars per student ever since? Like, which one's worse? Like, cool story, Bro, but which one's worse?

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    And so some sense of like, we have FCMAT because it's, it turns out school districts are not perfect and they're not necessarily any better than the average charter school or charter school authorizer, which. So PCMAC was created.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    So this notion that if we just like, we just need maybe a little, like a little bit more professional development, maybe another auditing standard, that we're going to solve all of this because school district will take this. And I think that's not real.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    So, like, that's why the details are so important and why the author has spent so much time on that. But the other thing I want to say, you know, the local government Committee is about to shut down almost.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    The constitution says for charter cities that the Legislature is not supposed to legislate charter cities except when there's like a compelling overriding statewide interest. When I go back there, it'll be like every other hearing that we've had this year.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    Every single Bill that applies to cities has a language and it says this also applies to charter schools because, I mean, charter cities, because it's just so darn important. That law was intended to say, look, City of South Pasadena. No, it's not. You cannot legalize, you know, violent crime on your streets. You can't.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    You know, we're going to have fundamental open meeting laws, like the fundamentals. But the constitution says that the charters are supposed to be respected, that they are independent for a reason. But we have become in the Legislature so cavalier about it that we just override charters on every single thing.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    And I worry about that here because I've heard in this debate almost every other line is, well, you know, if somebody is receiving public funds, they should do the same exact thing. They should align with what school districts do.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    They should do the same laws as school districts, which is of course the exact opposite of what the charter school law is for. The charter school law is exactly the opposite of that. It is. Except just like charter cities in the Constitution, the law is innovate, experiment, be accountable.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    But you're specifically not supposed to be subject to every single law. And that's a design. That's not a flaw. That's a feature of the system. And so the question then is, how do we assure the appropriate accountability, not replace accountability and oversight and outcomes measures with.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    Well, the best way to do it is you should have the same exact accounting software and you should have the same color scheme. That's exactly what the charter thing is not so supposed to be about. So I.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    So when I hear it, it's a triggering thing for me that if there's a, if there's a public dollar, then it should apply to the same laws, because that's not the point. And so when we have bills, this is, I think, the thickest Bill I've had to vote on yet in the Senate.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    Like these orientations, the framing ideology that enters does matter. And so like we gotta. For folks that want to erase charter schools from the map or folks that think charter should apply with. Should comply with every single state law that applies to regular school districts, I just, it requires me to look a lot more closer. Okay, that's.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    If that's your intention. Walking in, I want to like, show me the receipts on how each of these provisions really does make sense. So I. That's why the value of these two bills, I think, is so important to bring both, you know, everybody to the table in order to try to resolve them.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    But for me, that's the test here. I want to be sure that we're not. There's no backdoor like that's going to harm the charter school concept fundamentally, but that also achieves the purposes that are here. For five minutes I had a Bill on this topic too.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    And so getting the accounting stuff right and the oversight right I think is absolutely important. Also making sure that what we're talking about in the charter school world is what the charter School act is about, which is principally around models, rigorous models of instruction that lead to improvements in student. Student outcomes.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    The charter school statute is not about everybody should just do whatever they want. Freedom for everyone. It's not a libertarian statute. It is around. Can somebody, on a proven basis show that they are achieving better student outcomes and closing the achievement gap? If they can, then by all means go forth and do and do good.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    So I also want to be sure as we move forward, not on this Bill and others that we are focusing on that as opposed to charters as sort of just, you know, let a thousand flowers bloom. Everybody should do whatever they, whatever they want to. So that part to me is important.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    The specific I want to focus though is on authorizing because I do think this is a critical part of it. And sort of his comments about the what other states do I think is incredibly instructive here.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    So, you know, the debate here is always, you know, school, local school districts are the next, are the closest thing to godliness. So they should like we should make sure every chartering author just authorizing decision, you know, we just got to make sure that local school district is the one in charge of it.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    They know what they're doing. Nobody knows their community better than they do. And I agree with that. I'm from local government. But then when it comes time to say now they have to authorize them, they're like, zero my God, they don't know what they're doing. You know, they're too close to the community.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    They don't, they don't get it. They're. They're incapable. This is a design flaw in the system that we have created. And so I do believe personally that we should be moving towards a authorizing system that on both the authorizing and then the.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    All the 99% of the rest of it, which is the follow up and the oversight and everything else, that there ought to be a mechanism other than only the district, the local school districts or the county. I recognize the State Board's issues before created a lot of problems for folks as well.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    But we need a strong authorizing system in California. And what we've Jerry rigged in the state is designed, is almost intended to be ineffective, but also incredibly, incredibly expensive. We could pay for the Inspector General in this Bill if we got rid of everybody doing, if we got rid of this fantasy that we're going to take.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    You know, let me. They're Rio Vista schools in my district, you know, population a couple thousand. And we're just going to give them so much PD and support and they're going to go to a FICMAT workshop and whatever and then they'll be great authorizers. No, they won't. They authorize like one charter a generation.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    Nobody remembers the last one. They don't learn anything to do it the next time. This is kind of a fundamental rule of oversight, is that you have to be doing oversight constantly. You have to learn from your mistakes and from your wins. If you only oversight.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    If you only authorize Occasionally, no matter how much training you have, how many guardrails, you don't get better at it. And so my own view is that we, that I appreciate the window that you're opening here on statewide authorizing, but I don't think the answer is a statewide support system for authorizing at the local level.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    We need to be moving towards a system that takes authorizing, authorizing in all of its dimensions, both approval to operate and then the oversight of the authorized schools into consideration.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    So I hope that you all keep working on that system, but recognize that we'll be much more effective and much more efficient and much more able to capture, to catch either mistakes or bad behavior if we have a more centralized approach to authorizing that permits for innovation and local control, but also recognizes that the parts after the authorizing decision are neither mainly about local control or innovation at that stage.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    They're about don't break the law, make sure you're spending your money properly. That does not need to be spread among thousands and thousands and thousands of authorizers. So I hope we're able to get there, to get into that space as well.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    So I want to just thank the chair, the Committee staff, certainly the author and organizations on all sides to try to resolve this. I'm very hopeful. I was very hopeful this year we'd have no charter bills at all. Then I broke that and introduced one.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    I'm very hopeful that we'll get to a solution on this so that we don't have another issue like this again. It is, yes, it's messy, it's hard, it's painful, there's blood on the floor from all of this. That's true for every charter Bill ever. So, you know, I get it. I'm not.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    Everybody's doing their very, their very, their very darndest. And I'm hopeful that we'll get it, that we'll get it across the line.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    I will look forward to paying attention to the details as they continue to be negotiated and you know, and if this Committee needs to reconvene or other means in order to assure that the package that we end up with between the two bills reflects these varying values and concerns and issues and opportunities to make sure that we are providing a meaningful, high quality, big impact, good outcome opportunities for families and students from throughout the state and simultaneously make sure that we're able, that we are fully protecting the public dollars, public interest and fiscal fiduciary responsibility, I think we can do it.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    We have the a team of Senator Ashby and Assembly Member Mitsuchi on this. So I look forward to the work today. I'm going to I won't be voting on a yes or no on the Bill just as a because I have a lot of concerns about it.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    But I also know that there's a lot of progress being made on the negotiation, hoping that we'll get a conclusion. Madam Chair, thank you for your work on this as well. Thank you. Thank you.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Great. Well, thank you. I know there's been a whole lot of discussion already, and I think a majority of my questions and concerns that I was going to raise have been raised already.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    So I just want to go ahead and take an opportunity, you know, I think one to share a little bit, you know, about my support for AB84, why I'm recommending an aye vote, and also understanding and underscoring that this is very much an active negotiation process. You know, we've met several times to discuss your Bill, Assemblymember Marsuche.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    I've met with several of the Members of the opposition that are in this room as well as the supporters, and I know that you've been very committed to continue to negotiate in good faith.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    I recognize that there is other legislation in this space, SB414, as I've shared with you and I've also shared with Senator Ashby, and it is my preference that there's a bringing together of both bills and an agreement that's met.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    I'm hoping that we'll enter that point at some point during the cycle, but, you know, we'll continue to be a part of that conversation, especially given my role in this process. So it's very important to me that a good policy comes out of this process.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    I want to make clear this Bill is not about punishing charter schools or eliminating parent choices. It's about common sense, accountability and rebuilding public trust.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Following the largest fraud scandal in California's public education history, AB84 implements thoughtful oversight reforms drawn from two independent nonpartisan reports, something I want to highlight and who I really want to give credit to. Here is Mr. Mike Fine, who's here with us today. You know, there's been a lot of conversation on both sides.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Some other we've heard from the opposition or the support? Support. I think one thing that's been made very clear is that we need more oversight and accountability in this space.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    I also want to make clear, and I've shared this with several of the charter schools that I've met with, that it hurts charter schools to continue to allow for this mismanagement to happen. It harms the credibility of good charter schools that are doing good work for students.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    And whether those are charter schools that are brick and mortar and then the classroom, whether they're online, there are great things that are happening. And addressing this problem is so critical, not just for overall the misuse of tax dollars, but really ensuring that we're able to deliver and highlight the good work that's happening.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    It's being tarnished by these bad actors. And so we need to do something about this. So we've had this report that was commissioned in response to the A3 charter fraud case, a $400 million criminal scheme involving fake students, payments to youth sports, sports leagues for enrollment, and a complete breakdown in authorizer oversight.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    The case revealed how easy it is to exploit our current system, especially when authorizers are unprepared or under resourced. The reforms in this Bill are grounded in recommendations from the Legislative Analyst Office, the state Controller's office and the Fiscal Crisis Management Assistant team.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    And I want to highlight that because I think one of the things that concerns me and I, you know, this, this area of fiscal oversight and management and transparency laws are very important to me. I used to serve in local government. I passed one of the strongest campaign finance laws in the entire state.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    We don't even allow political donations from unions in the City of Alhambra. And so it is a very, very stringent law. And that was part of the reason was we did all of this work before I even got elected to to office around transparency.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Now, when you have a group that has committed fiscal mismanagement, the appropriate way to go about that is to find ideally a non partisan independent group to come up with recommendations to that.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Not the folks that want to see the other group be eliminated, not the group trying to regulate itself, but to actually have an independent agency come up with recommendations. And that's what you had here with FCMAT and with Mike Fine in generating this report, which I think is really critical and I want to highlight that.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    And as we continue to have these conversations, whether it's been on AB84, whether it's been on SB414, I've made very clear to both authors that it's my priority that the report that came out, that independent, nonpartisan analysis is what needs to be centered. And I've made that very clear to both folks. These are politically neutral public agencies.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Again, FCMAT in particular is not the grim reaper of charter schools. It regularly provides support to help charter schools in financial distress to stay open and improve. So this really, they are the experts in this space not just for public schools, but for charter schools.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    The Bill requires better data reporting, strengthens financial audits and makes sure school school districts have the capacity to oversee the schools that they authorize. It also protects public dollars by closing loopholes and the funding determination process for non classroom based charter schools. These are practical steps, not radical changes.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    And I want to highlight, because I know it's been mentioned before, both bills and the laws that they are proposing, as well as the report that Mike Fine produced, are making recommendations not just for charter schools. This Bill would apply to all LEAs, so it would be both public and charter schools.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    No school in the State of California should be committing this kind of fiscal mismanagement, misuse of funds. And so there needs to be accountability across the board. And that was something that was also very important to me. We should not be treating one different than the other.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    So I want to also make that very clear because I know that was brought up and raised. The author has already taken significant amendments to address concerns. We're continuing to work on those amendments, including removing or revising several controversial provisions.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    The Committee is adopting additional amendments today and discussions will continue over the summer on many other components of this Bill and the author has already committed to that. One of the provisions generating concern relates to how public funds are used for enrichment activities in NCB programs. Some families feel this could disrupt their model.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    But the intent here is not to prohibit vendor based instruction. It's to ensure public dollars are used responsibly and under the guidance of credentialed educators. This reflects a real tension. On one hand, families value flexibility and personalized learning, something that's important when we want to preserve.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    On the other, we must avoid turning instructional funds into publicly financed extracurricular accounts with limited oversight. So there's a balance that we're trying to meet here. Both concerns are valid and further discussion is warranted. We know that this is a major piece that we're still working through with the author.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    I support AB84 not because I oppose charter schools. I've supported many over the years and have worked with many of them over the years. Some of you are familiar with my work that we've done before my time here being elected to the this office, but because I believe in the integrity of our public education system and that is what is currently at stake.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    We owe it to families, taxpayers and students, especially those served by NCB programs, to ensure that every public dollar is spent transparently and with accountability. So with that, Assemblymember Marisucci, I'll just say again and if you could just say for the record, you know, I just want to ensure that you continue to work.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    I know there's been so many parents and families that have shown up today, and I really want to thank them for taking the time to be here. I know you recognize how important this Bill is to them.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    And, you know, will you continue to commit to working with these families over the summer as you continue to engage in negotiations, both with Senator Ashby as well as with many of the parents and other charter schools that, you know, have questions and concerns?

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Absolutely. I mean, we have worked in good faith to try to meet with as many people, not just the organizations represented in Sacramento. But I know that I've personally had conversations with many homeschool parents, individually and directly. But clearly we can't.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    You know, we haven't been able to meet with each and every homeschool family that has concerns about AB84, but we will continue this process. We are already, as I mentioned before, meeting twice a week with all stakeholders, including Senator Ashby's office, including the Charter School Association, and those discussions and negotiations will continue.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Okay, thank you. And I just want to say again, before I close out again, it is really my priority to make sure that we have a solid Bill in this space. I would ideally like to see one Bill come out of this process, and I think it's important.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    It's critical for everybody, not just taxpayers, but I think for charter schools themselves. It is not okay for us to allow this to happen. It tarnishes the reputation of really great schools that are doing amazing things, including in my own district. Mike Fine's done an incredible job with the recommendations he's made in this report.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    And I have to tell you, it's very concerning to me when I hear comments made about cherry picking parts of this report. I do not think that this is a case where we should be cherry picking what we do and don't want to do in terms of fiscal oversight and management.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    These are hard discussions, and I recognize that. I recognize there's also folks in this room that have raised concerns about the cost of oversight and accountability. But we also need to think about what is the cost if we continue to do nothing. And if we continue to do nothing, the cost, in my opinion, is far worse.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    So I will turn it over to you, Assemblymember, to go ahead and close. Thank you.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Thank you very much. I know that this has been a very long and robust conversation on one Bill. I'm trying to remember if I've spent this much time on a single Bill that's right.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Hopefully we won't be setting or breaking the record this afternoon when we hear Senator Ashby's Bill, but want to thank each and every one of you for your very thoughtful comments, questions on the Bill. I also want to thank each and every family, everyone that came out today.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Whether you're for or against the Bill, please be assured as I've committed, that we are negotiating in good faith to achieve the ultimate objective of this effort, which is to crack down on bad actors without hurting the good actors. And so with that, I respectfully ask for aye. Vote.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Alrighty. So we will now. Oh, we need a motion. We need a motion. So we have a motion by Senator Cortese and The motion for AB84 is do pass as amended to the Senate Appropriations Committee. Assistant, can you call the roll?

  • Committee Secretary

    Person

    [Roll Call]

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    And we will put that Bill on call.

  • Al Muratsuchi

    Legislator

    Thank you very much.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    We're going to go into recess, right? So we're going to go into a short recess while folks clear the room and we go through a transition. Thank you all.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Okay. Alrighty. Can I call. Yep. So we'll call the Committee back to order. I see it says recess TV. Okay, I heard my voice. So there we go. Alrighty. So we will now move on to item number 3, AB 500 by Assembly Woman Quirk Silva, who is here?

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Assembly Woman, you may be get started whenever you are ready.

  • Sharon Quirk-Silva

    Legislator

    My initial note said good morning, but now I'm going to say good afternoon to Madam Chair and Members of the Committee. I feel like it's a little seventh inning stretch here for you guys and I'm going to be pretty brief and cut out some of my talking points so we can move along.

  • Sharon Quirk-Silva

    Legislator

    But I'm presenting AB 500, a Bill that brings much needed transparency and accountability to how the University of California system updates its undergraduate admissions criteria. I had the opportunity to sit in here, some of the testimony, and I know a lot of the testimony before was about accountability and transparency.

  • Sharon Quirk-Silva

    Legislator

    And this bill, keeping it simple, is very much about that in the notes related to this bill. This bill actually came out of a select hearing that we did last fall with the Assembly committees on higher education. And it was a Joint Hearing and it was regarding the UC boar's admissions criteria change.

  • Sharon Quirk-Silva

    Legislator

    And that's one of the things. This is my 11th year in the State Assembly and we often have these hearings. Sometimes it's only the chair themselves, but in this case it was well attended and it was simply about how these admission changes can really affect not only students, but their families and planning.

  • Sharon Quirk-Silva

    Legislator

    And with that information is how this bill then became introduced. And what the gist of it is simply that we do not want to mandate what the UCs do, but we want to make sure that as much as possible that they are not, not only conferring, but working with our K12 system.

  • Sharon Quirk-Silva

    Legislator

    As we know that many high school students start to plan for admissions to higher ed as early as ninth grade. And when changes are made, it not only impacts their trajectory, but it also for the school systems themselves.

  • Sharon Quirk-Silva

    Legislator

    They cannot always react as quickly in creating new coursework or having the faculty, or I should say actually teachers on standby to be able to address this. So to be clear, AB 500 fully respects and preserves the University of California's constitutional authority to determine its own admission criteria.

  • Sharon Quirk-Silva

    Legislator

    And it does not mandate these policy decisions, but it is about transparency and ensuring that students, families and educators are not caught off guard by significant policy shifts that can affect a younger person's future.

  • Sharon Quirk-Silva

    Legislator

    With me today is actually a young person, Angela Negley, a recent graduate of UC Irvine, who now serves as part of the support system for families in San Jose School District. And she will be testifying on behalf of the AB 500.

  • Angela Negley

    Person

    Okay. Good afternoon, Madam Chair and Members of the Committee. My name is Angela Nagley, and as you heard, I recently graduated from the University of California, Irvine, and I now work with the school district in the City of San Jose with the Mckinney-Vento office where I support students and families, experience experiencing housing and stability.

  • Angela Negley

    Person

    And I'm here today to express my strong support for AB 500. And I thank Assemblymember Quirk Silva for her leadership. AB 500 ensures that before any changes are made to the UC admissions requirements, the UC boards of admissions and relations with schools must collaborate with key stakeholders, including students, K12 educators and CSU representatives.

  • Angela Negley

    Person

    As someone who attended a Title 1 high school and now works with families navigating educational and housing insecurities, I've seen how important it is for students to have the right information at the right time. Support programs like Advancement via Individual Determination give students access to the A G requirements and crucial advising.

  • Angela Negley

    Person

    But these resources are not guaranteed across the state and in too many schools, counselors are overwhelmed. And updates to admission policies happen without enough communication, causing students to miss critical opportunities. AB 500 affirms that admissions decisions must not happen in isolation.

  • Angela Negley

    Person

    Instead, they must reflect the lived realities of those most impacted with transparency and consultation and an ITER's equity. Because every student, regardless of their background, deserves a fair and informed path to higher education. No one should be left behind simply because they did not have access to the right information at the right time.

  • Angela Negley

    Person

    For this reason, I respectfully urge your aye vote on AB 500. Thank you.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you very much. The chair has. The real chair has departed temporarily. There's a momentary chair here. This would be the opportunity for anyone else that would like to do a MeToo in support of this bill.

  • Austin Webster

    Person

    Chair Members Austin Webster with W Strategies on behalf of Anaheim Union High School District in support.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you. Seeing no one else. Is there anyone that wishes to testify in opposition to this bill or even to a MeToo? To the testimony that we're not having in opposition? Seeing none. Then we'll bring the matter back before the Committee. I have a motion seeing no further discussion. Would you like to close?

  • Sharon Quirk-Silva

    Legislator

    Respectfully ask for an aye vote.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you very much. I hope that was really worth the wait. Then ask the police. Call the room.

  • Committee Secretary

    Person

    [Roll Call]

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    That's 2 to 0. We'll put that bill on call.

  • Sharon Quirk-Silva

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you. And if you are Assembly Members Fong, Berman, Solache, Irwin, or Ransom, you could walk in the door and present your bill. So please come to the Education Committee. While we're waiting... While Solache, Assembly Member Solache is coming, Senator Cortese moved to the consent calendar, so would you please call the roll?

  • Committee Secretary

    Person

    On the consent calendar [Roll Call]

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    That's 2 to 0 and we'll put that on call. Assemblymember Solache has arrived on the scene, and so we will move to item number six, AB908. And you are welcome to come and present. And if you have a witness to have them come and be seated forward.

  • José Solache

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    So welcome to the Committee. Thank you, Senator Laird. Or welcome to the Committee, such as it is. I know you've had a long hearing, so thank you for your time and your commitment to. Well, I think we went 3 hours and 45 minutes on the first Bill, and it's a record you should not try to break. We did see it on TV, so. Okay.

  • José Solache

    Legislator

    Thank you very. Thank you. So with that. Thank you, Senator Laird and Committee Members, I am proud to present AB 908. It's the LGBTQ Inclusion and Fair Treatment of Schools, the LIFT Act. This will help California schools achieve truly supportive, inclusive and safe environments for students.

  • José Solache

    Legislator

    I commend the chair and the Committee for their Work and thoughtful process. After the passage of Fair Act, California schools are required to have the inclusion of LGBTQ people and other historically marginalized groups and instructional materials. AB 908 simply adds compliance monitoring to that existing requirement in the Education Code.

  • José Solache

    Legislator

    The inclusion of LGBTQ community instructional materials is linked to greater student safety at school of student and lower rates of bullying. Our students have their best chance of success when they feel represented. All our students deserve equitable opportunities to grow, thrive and succeed. AB900A is sponsored by the Equality California and the Genders and Sexualities Alliance Networks.

  • José Solache

    Legislator

    Joining me in support, I would like to introduce Christopher Covington with Gender and Sexuality Alliance Network and Craig with Equality California.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Great. You each have up to two minutes. No obligation to take the full two minutes. So welcome to the Committee. Thank you. Which order you wish to go in? Thank you.

  • Craig Pulsipher

    Person

    Good afternoon. Craig Pulsipher on behalf of Equality California, proud co sponsor of AB908, appreciate Senator Solache's leadership on this Bill. California has long recognized that students learn best in environments where they feel safe, supported and reflected in the curriculum.

  • Craig Pulsipher

    Person

    In 2011, the Legislature passed the FAIR Education act, setting clear expectations for instructional materials to ensure they accurately reflect the diversity of our state. This includes not only recognizing the contributions of LGBTQ people but but also people of color, women, people with disabilities, and other ethnic, cultural and religious groups.

  • Craig Pulsipher

    Person

    In 2016, the State Board of Education adopted an updated history social science framework with guidance for integrating these requirements into classroom instruction, and that framework also established evaluation criteria for instructional materials, which references the new content required by the FAIR act as a prerequisite for adoption.

  • Craig Pulsipher

    Person

    At the same time, local school districts maintain flexibility to adopt either state approved materials of their own as long as those materials meet state content standards. Unfortunately, more than a decade after the FAIR act was passed, implementation remained deeply inconsistent across the state.

  • Craig Pulsipher

    Person

    A quality California's 2024 Safe and Supportive School survey of 146 school districts found that nearly two thirds had still not adopted LGBT inclusive instructional materials. AB908 is a straightforward measure that addresses this gap by adding the Fair Act to CDE's existing compliance monitoring process, leveraging a system that already provides oversight of other state and federal programs.

  • Craig Pulsipher

    Person

    We're not trying to add new mandates or impose new requirements on local school districts. It's simply about ensuring districts follow the law, provide inclusive materials, and foster a safe and supportive environment for California students. And respectfully urge your aye vote. Thank you very much. Welcome to the Committee.

  • Christopher Covington

    Person

    Good afternoon, Chair and Members of the Committee. My name is Christopher Covington. Pronouns are they and he. I am the California Advocacy and Campaigns Manager with the National Genders and Sexualities Alliance Network. I'm proud to be a sponsor and primary witness for AB908, the LGBTQ inclusion and Fair Treatment in Schools Act.

  • Christopher Covington

    Person

    I'm a multiracial genderqueer person living in Long Beach, California with over 13 years of working in community organizing specifically to dismantle systems of oppression and advocate for youth who is most impacted from injustices. This Bill is necessary in the State of California.

  • Christopher Covington

    Person

    At GSN Network We Train, Mobilize Trans Queer 2 Spirit and Allied Youth to lead movements for for safe and inclusive schools. AB908 is urgent and necessary. The FAIR act has been on the books for over a decade, but today Equality California's 2024 Safe School Report Card highlights only 37% of school districts are in compliance.

  • Christopher Covington

    Person

    LGBTQ students continue to be erased from curriculum, ignored by policy, and harmed in their classrooms. This law exists, but without accountability it is meaningless at GSA Network. We recently conducted a statewide survey with responses with over 350 Trans, queer, two, spirit, black, indigenous and youth of color across California.

  • Christopher Covington

    Person

    In that survey, our findings echo what we've heard long over time from youth. One in three youth named safety and acceptance as a top concern. One in four reported harassment and discrimination. And one in six said that their schools lack the tools, training and curriculum to support them. These numbers are unacceptable and preventable.

  • Christopher Covington

    Person

    AB9 creates the accountability mechanism we need. It directs the California Department to monitor the direct compliance of existence law, ensure that LGBTQ students are represented in curriculum and protected in policy. This Bill is more about policy, more than just policy.

  • Christopher Covington

    Person

    It's about survival, it's about belonging, and it's about doing right by hundreds of thousands LGBTQ youth in our schools. And if you could begin to wrap up. Yes, last sentence. As a sponsor of this Bill on the behalf of the students that we serve, we urge your strong and swift support for AB 908. Thank you.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you very much. We appreciate your testimony. This would be the opportunity for anyone to do a. Me too in support of this Bill.

  • Tiffany Mok

    Person

    Tiffany Mok on behalf of CFT in support of this Bill. Thank you.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you very much.

  • Eric Parades

    Person

    Eric Paredes with the California Faculty Association in support.

  • Keniza Hernandez

    Person

    Thank you. Keniza Hernandez, student in support.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you.

  • Elle Grant

    Person

    Elle Grant on behalf of the California Alliance of Child and Family Services in support.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you. Seeing no one else, we will move to opposition. I have no listing for a pr. We have a late breaking support here. So late breaking the most important.

  • Austin Webster

    Person

    Christopher Sanchez with Asians Americans Advanced Justice Southern California. Strong support. Thank you.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    This is the opportunity for anyone to speak in opposition. Welcome and you have up to two minutes. Okay. Lison. Yes.

  • Meg Madden

    Person

    Good morning. My name is Meg Madden. I represent.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Afternoon. It just was all morning.

  • Meg Madden

    Person

    Good afternoon. I was here all morning. Yeah, my name is Meg. Is it still on? My name is Meg Madden. I am. I represent cause Californians United for Sex Based evidence in Policy and Law. We absolutely need to support all of our students. And that starts with grounding our students in reality. Unfortunately, gender identity ideology is not based on reality. It is harming people.

  • Meg Madden

    Person

    We have had detransitioners and desisters and parents coming in for years now very dramatically explaining how being taught that they somehow are wrong because how they behave or how they like to dress or some other feeling inside of themselves is somehow not in alignment with their body and they are being physically harmed by doctors. Now the federal.

  • Meg Madden

    Person

    Federal Trade Commission is subpoenaing the hospitals that are doing this to kids. A lot of this starts on the Internet, but a lot of it also starts in the schools with this false identity ideology being taught to children from the time they are in pre K and nursery school.

  • Meg Madden

    Person

    This is a massive scandal and it is causing tremendous harm. And it is time for our legislators to wake up and understand what is truly going on here. These are false ideas. They make no sense. They are not in alignment with the reality of physical bodies.

  • Meg Madden

    Person

    They're not in alignment with the reality of child development, how children's brains develop, how children's own sexual development happens. Pushing these ideas onto young children is hurting them. Continuing to train teachers to push these ideas and enforcing that in the schools is harming our children. It's hurting them, not helping them. Thank you.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    And I assume you're concluding by saying you oppose this Bill.

  • Meg Madden

    Person

    I oppose the Bill based on what I just said.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you very much. This would be opportunity for anybody to do a MeToo in opposition to the Bill. Good afternoon. David Bollock, serving family values and opposition. Thank you for your. Thank you very much.

  • Nicole Young

    Person

    Nicole Young, Moms for Liberty California in opposition.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Thank you very much. Seeing no one else will bring it back to the Committee. The Vice Chair's returned but I just going to finish this Bill and then happily give her the gavel back. So this is back to the Committee. Are there questions or comments or even a motion? I can make a motion, but she has questions.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Okay.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Thank you, Mr. Chair. So. So I won't be supporting the Bill today and I'll share with you why when the. I believe it was my first or second year in the Legislature, we were, I was in education and we saw at that time now termed out Assemblymember Medina's Bill on ethnic studies.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And with that Bill he worked on that Bill for several years in order to be able to move it forward and actually be signed by the Governor which is what directs the ethnic studies component in studies in the state.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    When that Bill was going through the process of legislation, one of the components that they had in there or provisions that they had in that component was the fact that it would allow for local school boards to direct the materials that were going to be reflective of the. The demographics in their school district. Right.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So what it was was the Department of Education would hold all of the. Would provide all of the materials and from those materials then the school districts could literally be able to. Thank you, will be able to. I'm not done with my comments. You don't, you don't want to wait till I'm finished.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So one of the provisions was that it would allow for the Department of Education to provide the materials and then the school districts would then have the local control to be able to select the public input and their local elected school boards select the materials that were reflective of their demographics.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So, you know, a community is primarily based, you know, has a huge population of Asian Americans. Aapi. Then they would be able to, you know, focus their ethnic studies on that component so it would accommodate every demographic that they need. With this particular Bill, what you're doing is. Or the intent, and I know what the intent is. I completely understand what the intent is.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    But it goes, it says here, compliance review makes the instruction materials adoption subject to the annual compliance review by the Department of Education to ensure that the materials adhere to the existing law, which requires, among other things, that they accurately portray the cultural and racial diversity of our society, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So now you're taking away that component that was actually in the provision of that was literally the way that they would allow this particular Bill, in this case ethnic studies, to move forward. It was that capacity for the local school district to be able to say, okay, these are the demographics that we have.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    This is what's going to match the curriculum and the materials. It's going to match them. And you gave that local. Now with this particular Bill, you're removing that provision and saying, no, the state will regulate. School districts are supposed to be choosing based on what the materials are given by the state.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    The state tells you these are the appropriate materials, and then the local school district decides. And so that's why I can't in principle support this Bill because it's taking away the very, very essence as to the provision that allowed ethnic studies to go through that Committee. And it is why I won't be able to support that Bill.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And I think this is where it's very important to ensure that we have an engaged citizenry in our elections in our local school board. Why I talk to people about why it's so important to know who your school board Members are. Right. Be engaged in that process.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And so that's one of the other reasons why I'm so engaged and advocating for civic engagement classes so that people know, how do we get our voices heard? How do we elect folks that represent our demographics and be able to have the best representation for or representation in our local school districts?

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Most people don't even know who their local school board Members are. They don't. And so this is why it's Important. But I think this changes the very, very essence of what we have been giving our local school boards. With that, I'm going to respectfully oppose the Bill today.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    But I completely understand the intent, and I understand why you're doing it with that. Any other comments, questions, Senator Laird? Well, there's no other Senator. I was just going to ask, rather than me make a comment, if you would like to respond to those comments and the testimony against. I know that you may well do it in your closing.

  • José Solache

    Legislator

    I was in my closing, yes. That's okay, then.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Okay. I was going to play off it, but I can't speak after your close, so I would just say that I think this is an important Bill because it is important to recognize differences in a safe place, and that's what this does. And I think I wish that had existed for me at a certain time.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    And, I mean, I think it's a misrepresentation to say some of this stuff happens in pre K or TK it is really about later in the. In the educational experience that some of this comes into play. So at the appropriate time, I would be ready to move the Bill.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    And maybe now I've shut up and he can get to his close.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Well, I'm going to allow Senator Cabaldin an opportunity if he has any comments, questions. zero, ditto on that. So we do have a motion by Senator Laird. Okay. Do me a huge favor, Member. Can you pronounce your last name for me?

  • José Solache

    Legislator

    Solache.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    It is Solache. So that's what I thought, but we were having a huge discussion in my office, like, how do you pronounce this last. And I've had a bad history this week in severely butchering last name. So I just wanted to give you an opportunity to. To pronounce it before I attempted my. My interpretation. So Member Solache. Would you like to close?

  • José Solache

    Legislator

    Thank you, Madam Chair. Well, you may butcher someone's name. I actually change people's name, so don't worry. We might. That might be even worse. I change people's name. I rename someone a different name. So. And my office always makes fun of me. They're like, that's not their name. Then restaurants, I do it all.

  • José Solache

    Legislator

    But on that note, thank you. You know, this Bill, obviously, thank you for the feedback. I appreciate your words. And, of course, Mr. Laird, thank you for your words. And just like you, you know, I wish some of these languages early on to protect our students.

  • José Solache

    Legislator

    As a former school board Member myself for 10 years, you know, I saw how representation matters and giving our students and simply respectfully to the opponent that spoke to this, this is simply a compliance language. This is all it really is. Right.

  • José Solache

    Legislator

    I don't know what language and you know, and items were brought up during the opposition, but this is a simple compliance Bill that will help us make sure that our students and our school districts have, you know, the language to help protect our students, to give our students a voice.

  • José Solache

    Legislator

    I just want to highlight that that's the intent of the Bill, you know, not this national situation that we're going on, you know, in a time where we have to protect community.

  • José Solache

    Legislator

    I'm proud to be a Californian where Californians express our values differently and you know, making sure that our school districts, our communities are involved in this process and that our students feel included, feel loved and accepted. Any, any schools that they attend. With that, I respectfully ask for a night vote. Member Solace does it.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Thank you, Member Solache. Grateful for your closing. We'll now bring it back to Madam Secretary. Please call the roll file item 6, AB 908. So do I need to read the motion? Solache, are you gonna read? Okay, go ahead.

  • Committee Secretary

    Person

    Motion is do passed to the Senate Appropriations Committee. [Roll Call]

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Okay, we're going to place that Bill on call for our absent Members.

  • José Solache

    Legislator

    Thank you for your time.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Thank you. All right, we have Assembly Member Irwin in here present. So we're going to continue with file item number seven, AB 932. Oh, I'm sorry. I apologize. I believe Assembly Member Fong was here... Oh, he's late. Okay. What a gentleman. Thank you so much. Look at that. Ladies first. Absolute gentlemen, thank you so much. And we're gonna... So we are gonna continue with file item number seven by Assembly Member Irwin, AB 932. You may proceed when you're ready.

  • Jacqui Irwin

    Legislator

    Oh, thank you so much. I'm pleased to present AB 932, a bill that received bipartisan support and would increase access and equity for girls in youth athletics. Current law prohibits gender based discrimination by counties and special districts at school and park facilities.

  • Jacqui Irwin

    Legislator

    Title IX and California law prohibit local education agencies from gender based discrimination on their own interscholastic teams. However, no existing law ensures that local education agencies that rent out spaces to third party youth sports clubs must do so on an equitable basis with respect to gender. This loophole has created a pathway for continued gender based discrimination.

  • Jacqui Irwin

    Legislator

    Many young women participate in club sports because their preferred sport is not offered until middle or high school or because they're hoping to play at the collegiate or professional level. As we prepare for the 2028 LA Olympics, it's imperative that we ensure full gender equity for all our Olympic hopefuls in California. Laws like these provide protection to clubs that face discrimination.

  • Jacqui Irwin

    Legislator

    Such as the Davis Youth Softball Association, which settled with the City of Davis after allegations that the girls softball club was being charged for field use and electricity field, while the boys baseball organization was accessing the field for a dollar and enjoying shaded dugouts, water fountains, and other amenities.

  • Jacqui Irwin

    Legislator

    AB 932 would close this loophole that allows for discrimination against young women in sports. This is not about who can play on the field. It's about whether there is a field for our athletes to play on at all. And I had a witness, but your Committee unfortunately went very, very long and they had to leave.

  • Tiffany Mok

    Person

    Okay, I'm also going to...

  • Jacqui Irwin

    Legislator

    Oh, you are? Oh, I'm sorry. I still have a witness.

  • Tiffany Mok

    Person

    You still have a witness. An unexpected witness who had to endure the long, long hearing. So, I'm Tiffany Mok with CFT. We are very proud to support Assembly Member Irwin's bill, AB 932, to ensure gender equity in sports allocations at the local level. Also, as a resident of Davis, I am very excited that she is having this bill run so that all our wonderful facilities can be used, either in Davis or across the state. So for those reasons, I proudly support AB 932 and urge your aye vote.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Thank you very much. We'll now continue with any witnesses in support of AB 932 here in room 2200.

  • Michelle Warshaw

    Person

    Michelle Warshaw on behalf of the California Teachers Association in support.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Seeing no other witnesses, we'll now continue with any witnesses in opposition to AB 932. And just as a reminder, every witness has two minutes to plead their case.

  • Meg Madden

    Person

    Hello again. I am Meg Madden. I represent CAUSE, as well as Our Duty, and Women Are Real. Since AB 932's first Committee hearing on April 8, my colleagues and I have explained that AB 932 is harmful because it cements into law the dangerous falsehood of gender identity while paving the way for further violation of Title IX by California's Department of Education.

  • Meg Madden

    Person

    We are met every time with denial that service to gender identity is the aim of the bill. Yet in an official support letter for AB 932, a transgender activist group applauds the bill's inclusion of gender identity as a protected category, and the witness also just stated the word gender. You can't have it both ways. There is no way to protect the sex based rights of girls participating in girls sports while simultaneously permitting boys who claim to not be boys to participate in the same sports category.

  • Meg Madden

    Person

    There are two sexes and no one's sex can or will ever change. This means preventing discrimination on the basis of sex means protecting one sex from being discriminated against by or in favor of the other sex. If males are ever included in what is supposed to be the female sports category, that category becomes co-ed and there is no female sports category.

  • Meg Madden

    Person

    Consequently, there can be no protection of females on the basis of sex. In 2013, this body replaced the reality of sex with the imaginary concept of gender identity in education based sports, sex category and sex separated accommodations like bathrooms and locker rooms. California has been in violation of federal law Title IX ever since.

  • Meg Madden

    Person

    Any law that continues to perpetuate this fraudulent system where the language appears to protect sex based rights when in fact it promotes gender identity is not protecting anything. It is itself violating protections based on sex. In plain language, AB 932 equates sex and gender identity as separate but equal categories. This is bad enough, but looking deeper, gender identity...

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    You're right at two minutes, so if you could wrap up.

  • Meg Madden

    Person

    Okay, I'm wrapping up. Looking deeper into the gender identity based language changes already inserted into California law and current language in AB 82, the California Legislature is even redefining sex to include gender identity. Both strategies are nefarious.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Thank you, ma'am. Sorry about that.

  • Nicole Young

    Person

    Both strategies are... I'm Nicolle Young. I'm representing Moms for Liberty California. Both strategies are a nefarious project to completely remove the binary reality of sex as a protected class in California law. This goes beyond discrimination. Gender ideology in law harms vulnerable children and adults who have this irrational belief system imposed on them by the state, convincing them that harming healthy bodies in order to look like the opposite sex based on feelings is good or necessary.

  • Nicole Young

    Person

    This evil lie permeating California code has no basis. One week ago, Californians Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon and your former colleague and now United States Attorney Bill Essayli sued the California Board of Education on behalf of the United States of America over Title IX violations. Billions in federal education dollars are at risk if California continues to serve gender ideology in its laws.

  • Nicole Young

    Person

    Also this week, the Federal Trade Commission announced subpoenas of gender clinics and hospitals accused of misleading parents and harming children who were indoctrinated into gender ideology by the same type of fraudulent gender identity language legislators are deceitfully inserting into our state legal codes, including AB 932. The fact of sex cannot be denied or erased by an adopted identity, not in a world that includes anyone who is still capable of reason.

  • Nicole Young

    Person

    By inserting gender identity into the education code, the Legislature is irresponsibly ensuring that there will be more harm to innocent girls and impressionable youth to the rights of women and girls and ensuring many painful years and millions of tax dollar spent disentangling our laws from this harmful web of lies. Please keep protecting women's sports by making women's sports only female. And vote no on AB 932. Thank you.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Thank you. Able to finish her statement and finish yours under two minutes. Okay, so now we're going to continue with any witnesses in opposition here in room 2200.

  • David Bolog

    Person

    Good afternoon. David Bolog, Serving Family Values. We are in opposition. Thank you.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    I see no other Members in opposition or any other constituents in opposition. We'll bring it back to the dais. Any comments, questions? Senator Cabaldon.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    Thank you, Madam Vice Chair. So, I'm the Senator from Davis. I appreciate the author's work on this. And also just to be clear, the bill does exactly and only what the author has described, which is to extend the the same framework of equity when the city or another agency is leasing their facilities or granting them for a dollar to assure that that's happening in a way that is fully consistent with the nation's longstanding commitment to gender and sex equity in sports.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    That's all the bill does. I've heard the Moms for Liberty and arguments on this in the past, but this bill doesn't open any of those issues up. This is already an existing feature of state law with respect to gender and sex, both from the Legislature and in a couple of measures adopted by the voters of California.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    The national attacks that are coming on California that would seek to withdraw funding for, as in this case, charging the Davis women's or girls softball team more money in order to practice to the point that where they can't play at all is not going to solve anyone's conception of what the gender debate is nationally.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    And we shouldn't be using girls sports as a political football when they deserve every opportunity and they are guaranteed every opportunity under state and federal law to succeed. So thank you very much. I wish I'd carried this from Davis, but I know from that experience that people of goodwill know how to figure this out.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    Communities do as well. They just need the proper guidance and accountability measures for that to, for to become real. Appreciate the author's diligent work on what is a modest but very, very important bill to protect equity for our young, for our young girls. At the appropriate time, I'd like to move one bill, since Senator Laird does all the rest.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Teamwork. Teamwork. We'll claim seniority on that motion. Okay, perfect. I think the biggest concern that the opposition has with regards to this particular bill, and I completely agree that there shouldn't be any discrimination. We should have equitable funding for and allocation for resources for women.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    I think where the concern lies is the definition, especially in light of the conversations that are happening throughout the state and the federal government has to do with the definition of, you know, or how it's being portrayed as far as the basis of sex and gender and so.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Or the identity of gender. So I think that's where people are having a lot of conversations and concerns about this particular bill on this motion. But with that in mind, I just wanted to make sure we had that on record. With that, Assembly Member, would you like to close?

  • Jacqui Irwin

    Legislator

    Certainly. And I appreciate Senator Cabaldon's pointing out that this bill is about girls sports. And if you support girls in sports, it is very important to close this loophole. And I know you represent Davis. It happened that I have a story of my own that when I was in high school, there was no girls swim team, and I had to swim with the boys. So I am an absolute proponent of Title IX. The opportunities that it has given young women are endless.

  • Jacqui Irwin

    Legislator

    And so when I heard that, let's be really clear, girls teams are afforded protections on their school teams, their club teams at city and county run facilities. But when they're working hard in the off season on their club team at a school run facility, they are not afforded those same protections. So this is purely closing a loophole to make sure that girls can play. Thank you. With that, I ask for your aye vote.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Thank you, Member Irwin. We have a motion by Senator Laird. I'm sorry.

  • Christopher Cabaldon

    Legislator

    Is that... Is Senator Laird just in the script always? Is that how it works?

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    At least you know how to say Solache.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    I apologize. My mistake. We have a motion by Senator Cabaldon. Madam Secretary, please call the roll.

  • Committee Secretary

    Person

    File item 7, AB 932, Irwin. Motion is do pass to the Senate Appropriations Committee. [Roll Call]

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    We'll place that bill on call for our absent Members. Thank you very much. Now we'll proceed with our gentleman, Assembly Member Fong. What bill number is that? That would be file item number four, AB 695. And you may proceed when you're ready.

  • Mike Fong

    Legislator

    Thank you so much. Good afternoon, Madam Chair and Committee Members. First, I would like to accept the Committee's Amendments identified in the Committee analysis and thank your Committee consultant for the suggestions.

  • Mike Fong

    Legislator

    To make the process clearer, Assembly Bill 695 establishes a process for our community college students in California who leave the United States due to immigration enforcement actions to continue their education remotely online. Over the last few months, on an almost daily basis, we have seen reports of individuals that detained by federal agents and deported.

  • Mike Fong

    Legislator

    Due to the nature of the arrests, some individuals have decided to leave on their own to avoid the physical threat. AB695 would allow our community college students who leave the country, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, the opportunity to continue their education through an online community college program.

  • Mike Fong

    Legislator

    If there were students exempted from paying non resident tuition, students participating in the online program may continue to be exempted from paying non resident tuition. This Bill is very narrow. Only students who are firmly community college students are able to enroll. Deportation of students.

  • Mike Fong

    Legislator

    Not just the students, but the deportation of our students affects not just the students, but the state's economic and social progress. By enabling students the opportunity to continue their education online, we're helping them maintain their academic progress. This Bill will help our students contribute to the economy immediately if they're able to return with legal status.

  • Mike Fong

    Legislator

    Here to testify and support are East Los Angeles community college President, Dr. Monte Perez and Christopher Sanchez with the Central American Resource Center. Thank you.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    You may proceed.

  • Monte Perez

    Person

    Good afternoon, Chair Perez, Vice Chair Ochoa Bogh and honorable Members the Committee. I want to thank Assemblymember Mike Fong for authorizing or authoring AB695, a landmark Bill that will greatly benefit thousands of California student residents in difficult times. My name is Dr. Monte Perez. I'm representing Los Angeles Community College District sponsoring the AB695.

  • Monte Perez

    Person

    I currently serve as President of East Los Angeles College, one of the nine colleges in the Los Angeles Community College District. California community colleges sustain the hope, aspirations and success of 2 million credit and non credit students. As a system, we proudly serve them. LACCD educates students from all background walks of life.

  • Monte Perez

    Person

    We do so without exception and without apology. We educate more women than men and we enroll more first generation low income students, dreamers, adult learners, veterans, foster youth and under resourced students with all aspirations to finish college and pursue a career.

  • Monte Perez

    Person

    Many of our students come from mixed status families and for them education is not just a pathway to economic mobility, it's a lifeline. Our story is by no means unique, same throughout California community colleges. Unfortunately, when a student is deported, even if they were previously enrolled and paying in state tuition, their academic journey is abruptly disrupted.

  • Monte Perez

    Person

    AB 695 provides a thoughtful, compassionate remedy. The Bill allows deported students to continue their education through online community college programs and exempts them from paying non resident tuition if they meet the bill's requirements. If these students are able to legally return and resume in person instruction, they'll retain their resident status financial aid eligibility.

  • Monte Perez

    Person

    We believe no student should be punished twice, once by deportation and again by the loss of their educational journey. AB695 upholds our shared values as students who have called California home, contributed to California's robust economy, have been good citizens investing in their education, deserve a chance to keep moving forward even in the face of tremendous adversity.

  • Monte Perez

    Person

    On behalf of East Los Angeles College, Los Angeles Community College District, I respectfully urge you and aye vote for AB695. Thank you for your time and consideration.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Thank you very much Sir.

  • Christopher Sanchez

    Person

    Good Afternoon Madam Chair and Members Christopher Sanchez with the Mesa Verde Group here on behalf of the Central American Resource Center who is in support of Assembly Bill 695. CARECEN is the largest Central American immigrant rights organization in the country, empowering Central Americans and all immigrants in defending civil and human rights.

  • Christopher Sanchez

    Person

    In addition to providing immigration legal services to the general community, we also have the privilege to provide a wide range of immigration legal services to majority of California CSUs and community colleges in Ventura, Los Angeles, Orange, and San Bernardino Counties.

  • Christopher Sanchez

    Person

    Through our experience in providing these services, we know firsthand the complexities that have always existed in the legal immigration processes that have historically been available through immigration policy. And law, a law that has been quoted to be the second most complex area of law next to the tax code. As a result, there are various immigration statuses and protections that Californians may have.

  • Christopher Sanchez

    Person

    However, under this Federal Administration, we are seeing long-standing legal pathways and immigration statuses that offer protections being stripped away from those who were once eligible for them, which has made the immigrant community more vulnerable to deportation, especially those who are in California's community colleges.

  • Christopher Sanchez

    Person

    It is estimated that roughly 27,000 undocumented students graduate from California high schools, with the majority of those pursuing higher education entering into the community college system. Many of those students will continue to be.

  • Christopher Sanchez

    Person

    Many of those students will continue to be completely undocumented as they don't have access to DACA, which has historically created a layer of protection for immigrant youth from deportation. Other common statuses that students have include temporary protected Status, Special immigrant Juvenile Status and U visa for survivors of crimes who have cooperated with law enforcement.

  • Christopher Sanchez

    Person

    There are just a few examples of those that are being under the threat of being significantly narrowed or in some cases completely eliminated under this Administration, which creates a strong possibility for them to be targets for enforcement. While many may think that immigration ends after deportation, that's not true on a case by case basis.

  • Christopher Sanchez

    Person

    Many immigrants may seek to adjust their status abroad, to return to the United States or to challenge our deportation case because they've been wrongfully deported. For decades, California has been the leader in shaping immigration college access for immigrant youth. Just over two minutes. Sorry about that. Thank you, Madam.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Thank you so much. Now we're going to continue with any witnesses in support of ABC 695.

  • Nicole Young

    Person

    Cassie Mancini on behalf of the California School Employees Association in support.

  • Mark McDonnell

    Person

    Thank you. Mark McDonnell on behalf of the Kern San Diego Contra Costa Southwestern State Center, Foothill De Anza, Victor Valley and San Bernardino Community College districts in support.

  • Austin Webster

    Person

    Chair, Austin Webster with W Strategies on. Behalf of the Student Senate for California Community Colleges and the Faculty Association and California Community Colleges and strong support.

  • Kasha B Hunt

    Person

    Kasha Hunt with NOSMAN on behalf of. Citrus College, North Orange County Community College District and Mount SAC Mount San Antonio College.

  • Ria Kumar

    Person

    Thank you Honorable Chair and Members Ria Kumar with Wildcat Consulting representing UDW AFSCME. Local 3930 and Unite Here Local 11 in strong support. Thank you.

  • Michelle Warshaw

    Person

    Michelle Warshaw with California Teachers Association in support.

  • Valerie Johnson

    Person

    Valerie Johnson with the California Undocumented Higher Education Coalition in support.

  • Tiffany Mok

    Person

    Tiffany Mok on behalf of CFD, a union of educators and classified professionals in support.

  • Brian Rex

    Person

    Brian Rex with the Los Angeles Unified School District in support.

  • Orquídea Reyes

    Person

    Good afternoon. Orquidea Debroy Reyes on behalf of Hispanos Organized for Political Equality, Long Beach City College and Ed Trustworth in support.

  • Imran Majid

    Person

    Good afternoon. Imran Majid on behalf of the California Community College's Chancellor's office in support.

  • Eric Paredes

    Person

    Eric Paredes with the California Faculty Association in support.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Thank you very much. Seeing no other witnesses in support will now continue with any witnesses, any lead witnesses in opposition? See none. Do we have any other witnesses in opposition? Okay, he's not in opposition. He's just looking for a better seat. Sergius on the record.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So I'm the last person left here so I will help facilitate the conversation. Number Fung, thank you for bringing this measure forward. You know, it's interesting because you know, California has invested a lot of money on all of our education, education on all of our students for the State of California.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And I think in light of what is happening right now with the fear as stated by, by the support witnesses with regards to mixed status families and with the notion that right now if you self Deport, you have a better chance of coming back and getting a faster immigratory resolution on that end.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So there's a lot of students and you know, when we think about, I think it's a. I'm going to be supporting the Bill. Let me start with I'm supporting the Bill. And I'm supporting the Bill because I do believe that our students, you know, we've invested so much in California on our students and they deserve to finish that education. And we have many, many programs, including here in California in the US that are taking courses online in programs that are foreign.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    We have so many students that are doing that, including I had a staff Member in my district office who is earning his second master's degree online from a, from a college out in France. So bless his heart, every six weeks he had to have a trip all the way to Paris for his coursework.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So all of these, I think it's, it behooves us to be able to expand and be able to extend educational opportunities to folks that are living abroad. And that's the way that I view this particular Bill, is that we're offering an educational opportunity for students who may have very well started their educational program here and now they can continue the program abroad. And that's my view on this particular Bill.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And with that I will be supporting the Bill and I'm sure at some point, some point we'll have an opportunity to make a motion on the Bill. But with that Member Fong, would you like to close.

  • Mike Fong

    Legislator

    Thank you so much, Madam Chair, and thank you for the robust discussion on this. What we're really seeking is more opportunities for our students to continue their education and whether it's remotely. I think that's an opportunity, as you mentioned, to continue their education remotely.

  • Mike Fong

    Legislator

    And I think in these challenging times when students are able to go through the legal immigration process and if they ever come back legally, that they will be a contributor to California's economy. So I really appreciate your comments, appreciate the lead witness comments as well. And with that, I respectfully ask for.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    An aye vote only correction. Continuing their, their studies abroad. I'm just, I'm playing with you. I'm just. I think it sounds better. Thank you on that end. So with that, thank you very much, Member Fong.

  • Mike Fong

    Legislator

    Thank you so much.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Okay, thank you. What's that? I apologize. You do have a second Bill. Thank you. Oh, Berman. He's doing it on behalf of. Oh, okay, I see. So Member Fong will be presenting a Bill on behalf of Member Berman. That's File item number five, AB887. You may proceed when you're ready.

  • Mike Fong

    Legislator

    Good afternoon, Madam Chair and Senators. Today I'm presenting Assembly Bill 887 on behalf of Senator Marc Berman. Assembly Member Berman has accepted the Committee's amendments summarized in the analysis and he thanks the Committee staff for their work and efforts on AB 887.

  • Mike Fong

    Legislator

    Every year here in California, California is falling further and further behind other states in providing equitable access to computer science education leading to persistent gender and equity gaps. AB 887 is some of Berman's third iteration to increase access to this critical education in response to state cost considerations to take a creative approach without a state mandate.

  • Mike Fong

    Legislator

    AB 887 would establish the California Computer Science Demonstration Grant Program, a non state funded pilot program to increase access to computer science education at public schools that choose to participate.

  • Mike Fong

    Legislator

    A supporter of this bill is so committed to increasing equitable access to students that they are willing to put their own dollars to fund the pilot and implement it in coordination with a working group of stakeholders with relevant expertise in computer science education.

  • Mike Fong

    Legislator

    Importantly, when providing grants to eligible high schools, the non state funding equity entity, in coordination with the working group is required to consider geographic diversity and and prioritize increasing access to students that are underrepresented in the field of computer science, including students eligible for free or reduced price meals.

  • Mike Fong

    Legislator

    This pilot will serve as a concept and bring the statewide vision of computer science for all closer to reality. On behalf of Senator Marc Berman, I respectfully ask for an aye vote. Thank you.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Witness in support?

  • Mike Fong

    Legislator

    Today I'm joined by Amy Pizzoni, a public high school teacher from the Central Valley, and Adam Johnson, Executive Director of State and District Partnerships for the Western Region and College Board. Thank you.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Please proceed.

  • Amy Pizzoni

    Person

    Thank you, Madam Chair for allowing me to present on this important measure today. My name is Amy Pizzoni and I have been a public high school teacher in the Central valley for over 10 years. I am especially passionate about reaching out to those students who do not realize that computer science connects to their lives and their passions.

  • Amy Pizzoni

    Person

    And I do not have to actively recruit the students who want to study computer science because they come to me. All I have to do is provide them the opportunity.

  • Amy Pizzoni

    Person

    AB 887 will provide that same opportunity to California students who are currently shut out of computer science education. That is deeply concerning to those students, their families, to me, and should be to this Committee as well. Many of the roughly half of California schools offer no computer science.

  • Amy Pizzoni

    Person

    They might simply just be unsure how to introduce computer science to their students successfully. AB 887 gives schools a way to start small as they decide how best to invest in computer science education for their students within their unique context. Once they have this proof of concept, the confidence grows and the next steps begin become clearer.

  • Amy Pizzoni

    Person

    Research shows that students who have taken computer science improve academically in all areas. That is a big deal and speaks to the transferable skills they build which serve them well in life and career, even if that career is not in computer science.

  • Amy Pizzoni

    Person

    Students want this, families want this, but they are at the mercy of the school that serves them. AB 887 offers a way for schools to get started on this journey. There is every reason for schools to take advantage of this incredible pilot program. Thank you for your time and thank you for choosing to prioritize education in your legislative career.

  • Adam Johnson

    Person

    Madam Chair, Members of Committee, my name is Adam Johnson and at the College Board I'm an Executive Director for the State and District Partnerships for the Western Region which includes California. College Board is a nonprofit education organization that is deeply committed to expanding opportunities that prepare students for college and career success.

  • Adam Johnson

    Person

    As a long standing member of the Computer Science for California Coalition, I'm here to offer strong support for Assembly Bill 887 which establishes a pilot program, the California Computer Science Demonstration Grant Program. The College Board plans to serve as a funding entity of this pilot program.

  • Adam Johnson

    Person

    Underscoring our deep commitment to advancing computer science education in California and supporting students successes future. AB 887 addresses a critical and urgent need. Although California leads the nation in technological innovation, 56% of high schools in California only offer a single computer science course.

  • Adam Johnson

    Person

    This gap limits not only the opportunities available to our students, but also threaten California's ability to remain competitive in an increasingly tech driven global economy. AB 887 strategically targets schools with no existing computer science courses, ensuring resources reach communities with the greatest need.

  • Adam Johnson

    Person

    The logical and essential next step ensuring that every student, regardless of their background and zip code, can access the critical computer science computer skills necessary to thrive in today's economy. With that I will respect would would respectfully urge you to vote in support of the at the appropriate time. Thank you very much.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Thank you very very much for your testimony, both of you. Will now continue with any witnesses in support of AB 887 here in Room 2200. Please come to the microphone and this is the me too. Just as a reminder, it's name, your organization, and your position on the bill.

  • Diana Vu

    Person

    So, Diana Vu on behalf of the Association Council for School Administrators, we're formally removing our opposition to the bill. We want to thank the author and his staff and the Committee on their work on this bill. Thank you.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    We love to hear that.

  • Jose Torres Casillas

    Person

    Good afternoon, Chair and Members. Jose Torres with TechNet, in proud support.

  • Nadra Mamou

    Person

    Nadra Mamou on behalf of Project Lead The Way, in support.

  • Rita Abdel-Malek

    Person

    Good afternoon, Rita Abdel-Malek on behalf of Code.org and the CS4NJ Ccoalition members that signed on to the support letter including Kapor Center, PLTW, TechNet, College Board and Silicon Valley Leadership Group as well as Code.org are in strong support. Thank you.

  • Katherine Squire

    Person

    Katherine Squire on behalf of the California Commission on the Status of Women and Girls, in support.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Thank you very much. Seeing no other witnesses in support. Do we have any lead witnesses in opposition? Seeing none. Do we have any me toos in opposition? Seeing none. We'll bring it back to the dias. And lo and behold here we go. It'll be fast. So thank you very much for presenting the bill on behalf of Member Berman.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    I have supported the previous bill by Berman. I believe it was last year from what I see in my notes, AB 2097, and I am a firm believer we need to have these type of courses in our schools and we really should focus.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    I'm grateful that you folks are focusing on or the bill is focusing on schools that do not have the program yet. Tomorrow's world is here today and so it's incredibly important that we have this literacy implemented in our schools.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So look forward to either making the motion to support the bill or supporting the bill at the appropriate time. So thank you very much. Member Fong, would you like to close?

  • Mike Fong

    Legislator

    Thank you so much, Madam Chair. Thank you for your leadership and efforts in this space and to the lead witnesses as well. And so, on behalf of Assembly Member Berman, I respectfully ask for an aye vote.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you all

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    We will now continue with file item number eight, AB 935 by Member Ransom. Welcome. Glad to see you here.

  • Rhodesia Ransom

    Legislator

    Good afternoon, Senator. Thank you. Assembly Bill 935 is a California Legislative Black Caucus priority Bill. It is part of the 2025 Road to Repair Bill PAC Package. This Bill builds on California's long standing commitment to protecting civil rights by ensuring that critical demographics data related to civil rights complaints are collected and publicly posted.

  • Rhodesia Ransom

    Legislator

    Having access to this data will ensure Californians, particularly black students and families, have a clear understanding of their rights and when those rights are being violated. The California Reparations Task Force underscored this issue very clearly. When our laws lack clarity or when data is incomplete, systemic injustice and discrimination remains hidden in plain sight.

  • Rhodesia Ransom

    Legislator

    For two years, Members of this publicly, repeatedly, publicly, publicly arranged Committee repeatedly raised concerns, including issues with responsiveness and transparency related to the treatment of complaints filed by African Americans when raising civil rights concerns. In response, this task force provided the recommendations this Bill would implement.

  • Rhodesia Ransom

    Legislator

    The Bill is just a tool in our toolkit to increase transparency in government. These changes improve access to solid evidence based information for the Legislature, the public and the agencies. And lastly, AB935 promotes accountability while also ensuring strong privacy protections of all of the individuals involved.

  • Rhodesia Ransom

    Legislator

    With that I respectfully ask for your aye vote and I'm happy to entertain any questions.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Thank you very much. No lead witnesses.

  • Rhodesia Ransom

    Legislator

    There are no witnesses for this Bill.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Okay, do we have any witnesses in support of AB932 here in room 2100?

  • Rhodesia Ransom

    Legislator

    935.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Oh, 935. What did I say? Oh, sorry. Yes. 935. Sorry, I'm reading from my computer. Wrong number. Yes, 935 here in room 2100. Seeing none. Do you have any lead witnesses in opposition to Bill AB935? Seeing none. Any #MeToos. Seeing none. We'll bring it back to the dais. I guess I'm the only one.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So let me see here. So let's see.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So, I guess, I think the only question I would have to facilitate some conversation on the Bill would be with the Department of Civil Rights right now with regards. When they're receiving complaints and they're going through the process of receiving complaints and processing them, whether or not there's been any violation of rights. Have they had a need for demographic classification or identification of addressing those complaints.

  • Rhodesia Ransom

    Legislator

    So what we've learned, and this is through the task force work a couple years ago, is that in some cases, particularly in education, that the folks are complaining that their complaints are going unresponded to, particularly in regards to racial injustice and things like that. And there's no way to track that data.

  • Rhodesia Ransom

    Legislator

    So this Bill seeks to divide that and know what kind of complaints that we are receiving. But it's going to be anonymized data, so it's not going to include people's names and information, just what their complaint is. If it's regarding a specific discrimination, then we'll be able to track those trends through the Department of Education.

  • Rhodesia Ransom

    Legislator

    And this is different. This is very similar to what happens in the Department of Justice.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Okay. And so with the classification as they're going in and coming in, and if they were to continue to. Or not continue, but if they would begin to acquire that data, would it have a specific demographics or all demographics?

  • Rhodesia Ransom

    Legislator

    It would be all of the demographics, and then we'll be able to track the trends. So as example, say there's, you know, Asian Pacific Islands or black people or whatever that are having these complaints. It's not just to track for African Americans, but it's to look at trends of discrimination.

  • Rhodesia Ransom

    Legislator

    You know, typically when there are bills that do support concerns of African Americans, they normally do end up helping, you know, everyone get access to justice. And that's what this Bill is about.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So no specific demographic, just all demographics and just gathering that information. And that already exists in other areas?

  • Rhodesia Ransom

    Legislator

    Yes.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    In other departments.

  • Rhodesia Ransom

    Legislator

    That is correct.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Okay, perfect. Well, that's all my comments. Would you like to close?

  • Rhodesia Ransom

    Legislator

    Oh, no. Very briefly, just. Thank you very much and thank you. I think those are great questions because I think some people are trying to, you know, they're going, well, don't we already do this? And it's. And we wish that it was done like that. In every case, this is just about clarity, justice, and moving our state forward.

  • Rhodesia Ransom

    Legislator

    And with that, I just respectfully ask for your aye vote.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Thank you very much, Member Ransom. And we don't have any other Members at this time, so we can't have a motion, but. Oh, we might. Might. We were just. We just closed with file item number eight, AB.

  • Rhodesia Ransom

    Legislator

    935.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    935. And we're looking for a motion. We'll give it some time. We'll.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    We'll wait till we have more Members and we'll give Senator Choi an opportunity to. To catch up right there. Thank you very much.

  • Rhodesia Ransom

    Legislator

    No, thank you. You guys have a great day.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    So the Committee on Education or the Senate Committee on Education has just heard our last Bill.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    And so we are asking Members to come back to the Committee hearing room in 2100 so that we could start lifting calls. And we understand our Chair is also on her way.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Yeah, yeah. But let's do it because we both stepped out of rules.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Let's begin really quick, and we're going to be lifting calls. We'll begin with File item number one, AB84 by Member Morisuchi. Member Secretary, please call the roll.

  • Committee Secretary

    Person

    [Roll Call]

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Okay, we'll place that back on a call for absent Members. We'll continue with File item number two, AB279 by Member Patel, and that is.

  • Committee Secretary

    Person

    [Roll Call]

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Okay, perfect. We'll continue with File item number three, AB500 by Member Quirk Silva.

  • Committee Secretary

    Person

    [Roll Call]

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    We'll continue with file item number or leave that on call for absent Members. We'll continue with File item number four, AB695 by Member Fong.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    Do you need a motion? I would move the Bill.

  • Committee Secretary

    Person

    [Roll Call]

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Will place that on call for absent Members. We'll continue to File item number five, AB887 by Member Berman. We do need a motion. Senator Choi has made the motion.

  • Committee Secretary

    Person

    [Roll Call]

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    We'll place that on call for absent Members. We'll continue with File item number six, AB908 by Assembly Member Solache. Member Secretary, please call the roll.

  • Committee Secretary

    Person

    [Roll Call]

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    Okay, okay. We'll place it on call for absent Members. We'll continue with File item number seven, AB932 by Member Irwin. Madam Secretary, please call the roll.

  • Committee Secretary

    Person

    [Roll Call]

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    We'll continue. We'll place that on call for our absent Members. We'll continue with file item number eight, AB935.

  • John Laird

    Legislator

    I would move item number Assembly Member Ransom.

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    We have a motion by Senator Laird. Madam Secretary, please call the roll.

  • Committee Secretary

    Person

    [Roll Call]

  • Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh

    Legislator

    On call. We'll leave that on call for absent Members. We'll. oh, that's it.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    So we are going to go on a recess until some other Members arrive here. So we will go on on recess and until I bring us back to order, thank you.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Lift the calls. Assistant.

  • Committee Secretary

    Person

    [Roll Call]

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    I'll keep that Bill on call.

  • Committee Secretary

    Person

    [Roll Call]

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    We'll put that Bill back on call.

  • Committee Secretary

    Person

    [Roll Call]

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Great. We'll put that Bill back on call.

  • Committee Secretary

    Person

    [Roll Call]

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    Let's put that back on the call.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    So we'll go ahead and recess until Senator Cabaldin arrives. Then we'll bring the Committee back to order.

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    We will bring the Committee back to order. They're good. And we will now lift the calls on the bills. If you can call the roll or.

  • Committee Secretary

    Person

    [Roll Call]

  • Sasha Perez

    Legislator

    That Bill is out 5-1. Great. Thank you. And thank you to all of the Committee staff and everyone who's worked so hard on Senate. Ed. Yeah. This Committee is now adjourned. Thank you.

Currently Discussing

No Bills Identified