AB 1602: Alternative Grade 11 Assessment Pilot Program.
- Session Year: 2017-2018
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2017-05-03
Existing law establishes the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) for the assessment of certain elementary and secondary pupils, as provided. Existing law provides that the CAASPP includes, among other things, a consortium summative assessment in English language arts and mathematics for grades 3 to 8, inclusive, and grade 11. Existing law makes these provisions inoperative on July 1, 2020, and repeals the provisions on January 1, 2021.
TheThis bill would establish the Alternative Grade 11 Assessment Pilot Program, which would authorize school districts, that are selected by the Superintendent of Public Instruction to participate in the pilot program, to administer an assessment other than the CAASPP to grade 11 pupils if certain requirements are satisfied. The bill would require participating school districts to report results of the assessment to the Superintendent and report, on or before June 30, 2022, January 1, 2023, on the effectiveness of the assessment in accomplishing specified objectives. The bill would make the pilot program inoperative on July 1, 2022, 2023, and would repeal the pilot program on January 1, 2023. 2024.
Existing law establishes the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) for the assessment of certain elementary and secondary pupils, as provided. Existing law provides that the CAASPP includes, among other things, a consortium summative assessment in English language arts and mathematics for grades 3 to 8, inclusive, and grade 11. Existing law makes these provisions inoperative on July 1, 2020, and repeals the provisions on January 1, 2021.
The bill would establish the Alternative Grade 11 Assessment Pilot Program, which would authorize school districts, that are selected by the Superintendent to participate in the pilot program, to administer an assessment other than the CAASPP to grade 11 pupils if certain requirements are satisfied. The bill would require participating school districts to report results of the assessment to the Superintendent and report, on or before June 30, 2022, on the effectiveness of the assessment in accomplishing specified objectives. The bill would make the pilot program inoperative on July 1, 2022, and would repeal the pilot program on January 1, 2023.
Existing law establishes the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) for the assessment of certain elementary and secondary pupils, as provided. Existing law provides that the CAASPP includes, among other things, a consortium summative assessment in English language arts and mathematics for grades 3 to 8, inclusive, and grade 11. Existing law requires, in the 201314 school year, the consortium summative assessment in English language arts and mathematics to be a field test only. Existing law requires the State Department of Education, in the 201314 and 201415 school years, to make available to local educational agencies certain test forms no longer required by the CAASPP.This bill would delete these obsolete provisions.Existing law establishes the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) for the assessment of certain elementary and secondary pupils, as provided. Existing law provides that the CAASPP includes, among other things, a consortium summative assessment in English language arts and mathematics for grades 3 to 8, inclusive, and grade 11. Existing law requires, in the 201314 school year, the consortium summative assessment in English language arts and mathematics to be a field test only. Existing law requires the State Department of Education, in the 201314 and 201415 school years, to make available to local educational agencies certain test forms no longer required by the CAASPP.
This bill would delete these obsolete provisions.
Under existing law, various state and local agencies engage in water resource planning.This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation relating to water supply improvements.Under existing law, various state and local agencies engage in water resource planning.
This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation relating to water supply improvements.
Except as provided in Section 60641.1, this chapter shall become inoperative on July 1, 2020, and as of January 1, 2021, is repealed, unless a later enacted statute that is enacted before January 1, 2021, deletes or extends the dates on which it becomes inoperative and is repealed.
SEC. 2.Section 60641 of the Education Code is amended to read:60641.(a)Except as provided in Section 60641.1, the department shall ensure that local educational agencies comply with each of the following requirements:
(1)The achievement tests provided for in Section 60640 are scheduled to be administered to all pupils, inclusive of pupils enrolled in charter schools and exclusive of pupils exempted pursuant to Section 60640, during the period prescribed in subdivision (b) of Section 60640.
(2)For assessments that produce valid individual pupil results, the individual results of each pupil tested pursuant to Section 60640 shall be reported, in writing, to the parent or guardian of the pupil. The report shall include a clear explanation of the purpose of the test, the score of the pupil, and the intended use by the local educational agency of the test score. This subdivision does not require teachers or other local educational agency personnel to prepare individualized explanations of the test score of each pupil. It is the intent of the Legislature that nothing in this section shall preclude a school or school district from meeting the reporting requirement by the use of electronic media formats that secure the confidentiality of the pupil and the pupils results. State agencies or local educational agencies shall not use a comparison resulting from the scores and results of the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) assessments and the assessment scores and results from assessments that measured previously adopted content standards.
(3)(A)For assessments that produce valid individual pupil results, the individual results of each pupil tested pursuant to Section 60640 also shall be reported to the school and teachers of a pupil. The local educational agency shall include the test results of a pupil in his or her pupil records. However, except as provided in this section and Section 60607, personally identifiable pupil test results only may be released with the permission of either the pupils parent or guardian if the pupil is a minor, or the pupil if the pupil has reached the age of majority or is emancipated.
(B)Notwithstanding subparagraph (A) and pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 60607, a pupil or his or her parent or guardian may authorize the release of individual pupil results to a postsecondary educational institution for the purpose of credit, placement, determination of readiness for college-level coursework, or admission.
(4)The districtwide, school-level, and grade-level results of the CAASPP in each of the grades designated pursuant to Section 60640, but not the score or relative position of any individually ascertainable pupil, shall be reported to the governing board of the school district at a regularly scheduled meeting, and the countywide, school-level, and grade-level results for classes and programs under the jurisdiction of the county office of education shall be similarly reported to the county board of education at a regularly scheduled meeting.
(b)The state board shall adopt regulations that outline a calendar for delivery and receipt of summative assessment results at the pupil, school, grade, district, county, and state levels. The calendar shall include delivery dates to the department and to local educational agencies. The calendar for delivery shall provide for the timely return of assessment results, and consider the amount of paper-and-pencil administered assessments and number of items requiring hand scoring. The calendar shall also ensure that individual assessment results are reported to local educational agencies within eight weeks of receipt by the contractor for scoring.
(c)Aggregated, disaggregated, or group scores or reports that include the results of the CAASPP assessments, inclusive of the reports developed pursuant to Section 60630, shall not be publicly reported to any party other than the school or local educational agency where the pupils were tested, if the aggregated, disaggregated, or group scores or reports are comprised of 10 or fewer individual pupil assessment results. Exclusive of the reports developed pursuant to Section 60630, in no case shall any group score or report be displayed that would deliberately or inadvertently make the score or performance of any individual pupil or teacher identifiable.
(d)The department shall ensure that pupils in grade 11, or parents or legal guardians of those pupils, may request results from grade 11 assessments administered as part of the CAASPP for the purpose of determining credit, placement, or readiness for college-level coursework be released to a postsecondary educational institution.
SEC. 3.Section 60641.1 is added to the Education Code, to read:60641.1.(a)The Alternative Grade 11 Assessment Pilot Program is hereby established. The Superintendent shall establish guidelines for accepting applications and select up to five school districts to participate in the pilot program. One of the selected school districts shall be the Long Beach Unified School District if it applies to participate. The Superintendent shall consider geographical diversity and different sizes of school districts in selecting participants for the pilot program.
(b)Participating school districts may administer an assessment in grade 11 other than the CAASPP, if the following requirements are met:
(1)The assessment is a statistically reliable and valid norm-referenced or criterion-referenced test.
(2)The assessment shall be aligned to the academic content standards adopted pursuant to Section 60605.8.
(3)The administration of the alternative assessment is consistent with the local control and accountability plan adopted pursuant to Section 52060.
(4)The assessment is administered at no charge to pupils.
(5)The assessment is administered to all pupils in grade 11 except those who opt out pursuant to Section 60615.
(6)The assessment complies with the federal Every Student Succeeds Act (Public Law 114-95).
(c)Participating school districts shall do both of the following:
(1)Report test results to the Superintendent as determined by the Superintendent.
(2)Report, on or before June 30, 2022, January 1, 2023, to the Superintendent on the effectiveness of the assessment, described in subdivision (b), in all of the following areas:
(A)Increasing high school graduation rates.
(B)Increasing enrollment in A-G courses and Advanced Placement courses.
(C)Increasing college attendance rates among high school graduates.
(D)Improving student pupil performance on the assessment.
(E)Other areas jointly agreed to by the participating school districts and the Superintendent.
(d)Participating school districts shall not receive an apportionment for the assessment, described in subdivision (b), pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (l) of Section 60640.
(e)This section shall become inoperative on July 1, 2022, 2023, and, as of January 1, 2023, 2024, is repealed.
This Except as provided in Section 60641.1, this chapter shall become inoperative on July 1, 2020, and as of January 1, 2021, is repealed, unless a later enacted statute that is enacted before January 1, 2021, deletes or extends the dates on which it becomes inoperative and is repealed.
SEC. 2.Section 60641 of the Education Code is amended to read:60641.(a)The Except as provided in Section 60641.1, the department shall ensure that local educational agencies comply with each of the following requirements:
(1)The achievement tests provided for in Section 60640 are scheduled to be administered to all pupils, inclusive of pupils enrolled in charter schools and exclusive of pupils exempted pursuant to Section 60640, during the period prescribed in subdivision (b) of Section 60640.
(2)For assessments that produce valid individual pupil results, the individual results of each pupil tested pursuant to Section 60640 shall be reported, in writing, to the parent or guardian of the pupil. The report shall include a clear explanation of the purpose of the test, the score of the pupil, and the intended use by the local educational agency of the test score. This subdivision does not require teachers or other local educational agency personnel to prepare individualized explanations of the test score of each pupil. It is the intent of the Legislature that nothing in this section shall preclude a school or school district from meeting the reporting requirement by the use of electronic media formats that secure the confidentiality of the pupil and the pupils results. State agencies or local educational agencies shall not use a comparison resulting from the scores and results of the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) assessments and the assessment scores and results from assessments that measured previously adopted content standards.
(3)(A)For assessments that produce valid individual pupil results, the individual results of each pupil tested pursuant to Section 60640 also shall be reported to the school and teachers of a pupil. The local educational agency shall include the test results of a pupil in his or her pupil records. However, except as provided in this section and Section 60607, personally identifiable pupil test results only may be released with the permission of either the pupils parent or guardian if the pupil is a minor, or the pupil if the pupil has reached the age of majority or is emancipated.
(B)Notwithstanding subparagraph (A) and pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 60607, a pupil or his or her parent or guardian may authorize the release of individual pupil results to a postsecondary educational institution for the purpose of credit, placement, determination of readiness for college-level coursework, or admission.
(4)The districtwide, school-level, and grade-level results of the CAASPP in each of the grades designated pursuant to Section 60640, but not the score or relative position of any individually ascertainable pupil, shall be reported to the governing board of the school district at a regularly scheduled meeting, and the countywide, school-level, and grade-level results for classes and programs under the jurisdiction of the county office of education shall be similarly reported to the county board of education at a regularly scheduled meeting.
(b)The state board shall adopt regulations that outline a calendar for delivery and receipt of summative assessment results at the pupil, school, grade, district, county, and state levels. The calendar shall include delivery dates to the department and to local educational agencies. The calendar for delivery shall provide for the timely return of assessment results, and consider the amount of paper-and-pencil administered assessments and number of items requiring hand scoring. The calendar shall also ensure that individual assessment results are reported to local educational agencies within eight weeks of receipt by the contractor for scoring.
(c)Aggregated, disaggregated, or group scores or reports that include the results of the CAASPP assessments, inclusive of the reports developed pursuant to Section 60630, shall not be publicly reported to any party other than the school or local educational agency where the pupils were tested, if the aggregated, disaggregated, or group scores or reports are comprised of 10 or fewer individual pupil assessment results. Exclusive of the reports developed pursuant to Section 60630, in no case shall any group score or report be displayed that would deliberately or inadvertently make the score or performance of any individual pupil or teacher identifiable.
(d)The department shall ensure that pupils in grade 11, or parents or legal guardians of those pupils, may request results from grade 11 assessments administered as part of the CAASPP for the purpose of determining credit, placement, or readiness for college-level coursework be released to a postsecondary educational institution.
SEC. 3.Section 60641.1 is added to the Education Code, to read:60641.1.(a)The Alternative Grade 11 Assessment Pilot Program is hereby established. The Superintendent shall establish guidelines for accepting applications and select up to five school districts to participate in the pilot program. One of the selected districts shall be the Long Beach Unified School District if it applies to participate. The Superintendent shall consider geographical diversity and different sizes of school districts in selecting participants for the pilot program.
(b)Participating districts may administer an assessment in grade 11 other than the CAASPP, if the following requirements are met:
(1)The assessment is a statistically reliable and valid norm-referenced or criterion-referenced test.
(2)The assessment shall be aligned to the academic content standards adopted pursuant to Section 60605.8.
(3)The administration of the alternative assessment is consistent with the local control and accountability plan adopted pursuant to Section 52060.
(4)The assessment is administered at no charge to pupils.
(5)The assessment is administered to all pupils in grade 11 except those who opt out pursuant to Section 60615.
(c)Participating school districts shall do the following:
(1)Report test results to the Superintendent as determined by the Superintendent.
(2)Report, on or before June 30, 2022, to the Superintendent on the effectiveness of the assessment, described in subdivision (b), in all of the following areas:
(A)Increasing high school graduation rates.
(B)Increasing enrollment in A-G courses and Advanced Placement courses.
(C)Increasing college attendance rates among high school graduates.
(D)Improving student performance on the assessment.
(E)Other areas jointly agreed to by the participating districts and the Superintendent.
(d)Participating districts shall not receive an apportionment for the assessment, described in subdivision (b), pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (l) of Section 60640.
(e)This section shall become inoperative on July 1, 2022, and, as of January 1, 2023, is repealed.
SECTION 1.Section 60640 of the Education Code is amended to read:60640.(a)There is hereby established the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress, to be known as the CAASPP.(b)Commencing with the 201314 school year, the CAASPP shall be composed of all of the following:(1)A consortium summative assessment in English language arts and mathematics for grades 3 to 8, inclusive, and grade 11 that measures content standards adopted by the state board.(2)(A)Science grade level assessments in grades 5, 8, and 10 that measure content standards adopted pursuant to Section 60605, until a successor assessment is implemented pursuant to subparagraph (B).(B)For science assessments, the Superintendent shall make a recommendation to the state board as soon as is feasible after the adoption of science content standards pursuant to former Section 60605.85, as that section read on June 30, 2014, regarding the assessment of the newly adopted standards. Before making recommendations, the Superintendent shall consult with stakeholders, including, but not necessarily limited to, California science teachers, individuals with expertise in assessing English learners and pupils with disabilities, parents, and measurement experts, regarding the grade level and type of assessment. The recommendations shall include cost estimates and a plan for implementation of at least one assessment in each of the following grade spans:(i)Grades 3 to 5, inclusive.(ii)Grades 6 to 9, inclusive.(iii)Grades 10 to 12, inclusive.(3)The California Alternate Performance Assessment in grades 2 to 11, inclusive, in English language arts and mathematics and science in grades 5, 8, and 10, which measures content standards adopted pursuant to Section 60605 until a successor assessment is implemented. The successor assessment shall be limited to the grades and subject areas assessed pursuant to paragraph (1) and subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2).(4)The Early Assessment Program established by Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 99300) of Part 65 of Division 14 of Title 3.(5)(A)A local educational agency may administer a primary language assessment aligned to the English language arts standards adopted pursuant to Section 60605, as it read on January 1, 2013, to pupils who are identified as limited English proficient and enrolled in any of grades 2 to 11, inclusive, until a subsequent primary language assessment aligned to the common core standards in English language arts adopted pursuant to Section 60605.8 is developed pursuant to subparagraph (E).(B)If a local educational agency chooses to administer a primary language assessment to pupils identified as limited English proficient and enrolled in any of grades 2 to 11, inclusive, pursuant to subparagraph (A), it shall notify the department in a manner to be determined by the department and the costs shall be paid by the state and included as part of the testing contract, and the department shall provide the local educational agency a per pupil apportionment for administering the assessment pursuant to subdivision (k).(C)The Superintendent shall consult with stakeholders, including assessment and English learner experts, to determine the content and purpose of a stand-alone language arts summative assessment in primary languages other than English that aligns with the English language arts content standards. The Superintendent shall consider the appropriate purpose for this assessment, including, but not necessarily limited to, support for the State Seal of Biliteracy and accountability. It is the intent of the Legislature that an assessment developed pursuant to this section be included in the state accountability system.(D)The Superintendent shall report and make recommendations to the state board at a regularly scheduled public meeting no sooner than one year after the first full administration of the consortium computer-adaptive assessments in English language arts and mathematics summative assessments in grades 3 to 8, inclusive, and grade 11, regarding an implementation timeline and estimated costs of a stand-alone language arts summative assessment in primary languages other than English.(E)The Superintendent shall develop, and the state board shall adopt, a primary language assessment. The Superintendent shall administer this assessment no later than the 201617 school year.(F)This paragraph shall be operative only to the extent that funding is provided in the annual Budget Act or another statute for the purpose of this section.(c)No later than March 1, 2016, the Superintendent shall submit to the state board recommendations on expanding the CAASPP to include additional assessments, for consideration at a regularly scheduled public meeting. The Superintendent shall also submit these recommendations to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature and to the Director of Finance in accordance with all of the following:(1)In consultation with stakeholders, including, but not necessarily limited to, California teachers, individuals with expertise in assessing English learners and pupils with disabilities, parents, and measurement experts, the Superintendent shall make recommendations regarding assessments, including the grade level, content, and type of assessment. These recommendations shall take into consideration the assessments already administered or planned pursuant to subdivision (b). The Superintendent shall consider the use of consortium-developed assessments, various item types, computer-based testing, and a timeline for implementation.(2)The recommendations shall consider assessments in subjects, including, but not necessarily limited to, history-social science, technology, visual and performing arts, and other subjects as appropriate, as well as English language arts, mathematics, and science assessments to augment the assessments required under subdivision (b), and the use of various assessment options, including, but not necessarily limited to, computer-based tests, locally scored performance tasks, and portfolios.(3)The recommendations shall include the use of an assessment calendar that would schedule the assessments identified pursuant to paragraph (2) over several years, the use of matrix sampling, if appropriate, and the use of population sampling.(4)The recommendations shall include a timeline for test development, and shall include cost estimates for subject areas, as appropriate.(5)Upon approval by the state board and the appropriation of funding for this purpose, the Superintendent shall develop and administer approved assessments. The state board shall approve test blueprints, achievement level descriptors, testing periods, performance standards, and a reporting plan for each approved assessment.(6)The Superintendent shall convene an advisory panel, consisting of, but not necessarily limited to, secondary teachers, school administrators, school board members, parents, a student chosen from among the two finalists who were not appointed by the Governor to serve as the student member on the state board pursuant to Section 33000.5, representatives of a dropout recovery charter school operating pursuant to subdivision (g) of Section 47605.1, measurement experts, and individuals with expertise in assessing English learners and pupils with disabilities, to provide recommendations to the Superintendent on the continuation of the high school exit examination, described in Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 60850), and on alternative pathways to satisfy the high school graduation requirements pursuant to Sections 51224.5 and 51225.3.(d)The Superintendent shall make available a paper and pencil version of any computer-based CAASPP assessment for use by pupils who are unable to access the computer-based version of the assessment for a maximum of three years after a new operational test is first administered.(e)(1)From the funds available for that purpose, each local educational agency shall administer assessments to each of its pupils pursuant to subdivision (b). As allowable by federal statute, recently arrived English learner pupils are exempted from taking the assessment in English language arts. The state board shall establish a testing period to provide that all schools administer these tests to pupils at approximately the same time during the instructional year. The testing period established by the state board shall take into consideration the need of local educational agencies to provide makeup days for pupils who were absent during testing, as well as the need to schedule testing on electronic computing devices.(2)For the 201314 school year, each local educational agency shall administer the field tests in a manner described by the department in consultation with the president or executive director of the state board. Additional participants in the field test beyond the representative sample may be approved by the department, and the department shall use existing contract savings to fund local educational agency participation in one or more tests per participant. Funds for this purpose shall be used to allow for maximum participation in the field tests across the state. To the extent savings in the current contract are not available to fully fund this participation, the department shall prorate available funds by test. Local educational agencies shall bear any additional costs to administer these assessments that are in excess of the contracted amount. With the approval of the state board and the Director of Finance, the department shall amend the existing assessment contract to accommodate field testing beyond the representative sample, and to allow for special studies using information collected from the field tests.(f)From the funds available for that purpose, each local educational agency shall administer assessments as determined by the state board pursuant to paragraph (5) of subdivision (c).(g)As feasible, the CAASPP field tests shall be conducted in a manner that will minimize the testing burden on individual schools. The CAASPP field tests shall not produce individual pupil scores unless it is determined that these scores are valid and reliable.(h)The governing board of a school district may administer achievement tests in grades other than those required by this section as it deems appropriate.(i)Subject to the approval of the state board, the department may make available to local educational agencies a primary language assessment aligned to the English language arts standards adopted pursuant to Section 60605, as it read on January 1, 2013, for assessing pupils who are enrolled in a dual language immersion program that includes the primary language of the assessment and who are either nonlimited English proficient or redesignated fluent English proficient until a subsequent primary language assessment aligned to the common core standards in English language arts adopted pursuant to Section 60605.8 is developed pursuant to paragraph (5) of subdivision (b). The cost for the assessment shall be the same for all local educational agencies and shall not exceed the marginal cost of the assessment, including any cost the department incurs to implement this section. A local educational agency that elects to administer a primary language assessment pursuant to this subdivision shall do so at its own expense and shall enter into an agreement for that purpose with the state testing contractor, subject to the approval of the department.(j)Pursuant to Section 1412(a)(16) of Title 20 of the United States Code, individuals with exceptional needs, as defined in Section 56026, shall be included in the testing requirement of subdivision (b) with appropriate accommodations in administration, where necessary, and the individuals with exceptional needs who are unable to participate in the testing, even with accommodations, shall be given an alternate assessment.(k)(1)The Superintendent shall apportion funds appropriated for these purposes to local educational agencies to enable them to meet the requirements of subdivisions (b) and (c).(2)The state board annually shall establish the amount of funding to be apportioned to local educational agencies for each test administered and annually shall establish the amount that each contractor shall be paid for each test administered under the contracts required pursuant to Section 60643. The amounts to be paid to the contractors shall be determined by considering the cost estimates submitted by each contractor each September and the amount included in the annual Budget Act, and by making allowance for the estimated costs to local educational agencies for compliance with the requirements of subdivisions (b) and (c). The state board shall take into account changes to local educational agency test administration activities under the CAASPP, including, but not limited to, the number and type of tests administered and changes in computerized test registration and administration procedures, when establishing the amount of funding to be apportioned to local educational agencies for each test administered.(3)An adjustment to the amount of funding to be apportioned per test shall not be valid without the approval of the Director of Finance. A request for approval of an adjustment to the amount of funding to be apportioned per test shall be submitted in writing to the Director of Finance and the chairpersons of the fiscal committees of both houses of the Legislature with accompanying material justifying the proposed adjustment. The Director of Finance is authorized to approve only those adjustments related to activities required by statute. The Director of Finance shall approve or disapprove the amount within 30 days of receipt of the request and shall notify the chairpersons of the fiscal committees of both houses of the Legislature of the decision.(l)For purposes of making the computations required by Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution, the appropriation for the apportionments made pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (k), and the payments made to the contractors under the contracts required pursuant to Section 60643 or subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 60605 between the department and the contractor, are General Fund revenues appropriated for school districts, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 41202, for the applicable fiscal year, and included within the total allocations to school districts and community college districts from General Fund proceeds of taxes appropriated pursuant to Article XIIIB, as defined in subdivision (e) of Section 41202, for that fiscal year.(m)As a condition to receiving an apportionment pursuant to subdivision (k), a local educational agency shall report to the Superintendent all of the following:(1)The pupils enrolled in the local educational agency in the grades in which assessments were administered pursuant to subdivisions (b) and (c).(2)The pupils to whom an achievement test was administered pursuant to subdivisions (b) and (c) in the local educational agency.(3)The pupils in paragraph (1) who were exempted from the test pursuant to this section.(n)The Superintendent and the state board are authorized and encouraged to assist postsecondary educational institutions to use the assessment results of the CAASPP, including, but not necessarily limited to, the grade 11 consortium summative assessments in English language arts and mathematics, for academic credit, placement, or admissions processes.(o)Subject to the availability of funds in the annual Budget Act for this purpose, and exclusive of the consortium assessments, the Superintendent, with the approval of the state board, annually shall release to the public test items from the achievement tests pursuant to Section 60642.5 administered in previous years. Where feasible and practicable, the minimum number of test items released per year shall be equal to 25 percent of the total number of test items on the test administered in the previous year.(p)On or before July 1, 2014, Sections 850 to 868, inclusive, of Title 5 of the California Code of Regulations shall be revised by the state board to conform to the changes made to this section in the first year of the 201314 Regular Session. The state board shall adopt initial regulations as emergency regulations to immediately implement the CAASPP assessments, including, but not necessarily limited to, the administration, scoring, and reporting of the tests, as the adoption of emergency regulations is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare within the meaning of Section 11346.1 of the Government Code. The emergency regulations shall be followed by the adoption of permanent regulations, in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code).(a)There is hereby established the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress, to be known as the CAASPP.
(b)Commencing with the 201314 school year, the CAASPP shall be composed of all of the following:
(1)(A)A consortium summative assessment in English language arts and mathematics for grades 3 to 8, inclusive, and grade 11 that measures content standards adopted by the state board.
(B)In the 201314 school year, the consortium summative assessment in English language arts and mathematics shall be a field test only, to enable the consortium to gauge the validity and reliability of these assessments and to conduct all necessary psychometric procedures and studies, including, but not necessarily limited to, achievement standard setting, and to allow the department to conduct studies regarding full implementation of the assessment system. These field tests and results shall not be used for any other purpose, including the calculation of any accountability measure.(2)(A)Science grade level assessments in grades 5, 8, and 10 that measure content standards adopted pursuant to Section 60605, until a successor assessment is implemented pursuant to subparagraph (B).
(B)For science assessments, the Superintendent shall make a recommendation to the state board as soon as is feasible after the adoption of science content standards pursuant to former Section 60605.85 60605.85, as that section read on June 30, 2014, regarding the assessment of the newly adopted standards. Before making recommendations, the Superintendent shall consult with stakeholders, including, but not necessarily limited to, California science teachers, individuals with expertise in assessing English learners and pupils with disabilities, parents, and measurement experts, regarding the grade level and type of assessment. The recommendations shall include cost estimates and a plan for implementation of at least one assessment in each of the following grade spans:
(i)Grades 3 to 5, inclusive.
(ii)Grades 6 to 9, inclusive.
(iii)Grades 10 to 12, inclusive.
(3)The California Alternate Performance Assessment in grades 2 to 11, inclusive, in English language arts and mathematics and science in grades 5, 8, and 10, which measures content standards adopted pursuant to Section 60605 until a successor assessment is implemented. The successor assessment shall be limited to the grades and subject areas assessed pursuant to paragraph (1) and subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2).
(4)The Early Assessment Program established by Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 99300) of Part 65 of Division 14 of Title 3.
(5)(A)A local educational agency may administer a primary language assessment aligned to the English language arts standards adopted pursuant to Section 60605, as it read on January 1, 2013, to pupils who are identified as limited English proficient and enrolled in any of grades 2 to 11, inclusive, until a subsequent primary language assessment aligned to the common core standards in English language arts adopted pursuant to Section 60605.8 is developed pursuant to subparagraph (E).
(B)If a local educational agency chooses to administer a primary language assessment to pupils identified as limited English proficient and enrolled in any of grades 2 to 11, inclusive, pursuant to subparagraph (A), it shall notify the department in a manner to be determined by the department and the costs shall be paid by the state and included as part of the testing contract, and the department shall provide the local educational agency a per pupil apportionment for administering the assessment pursuant to subdivision (l). (k).
(C)The Superintendent shall consult with stakeholders, including assessment and English learner experts, to determine the content and purpose of a stand-alone language arts summative assessment in primary languages other than English that aligns with the English language arts content standards. The Superintendent shall consider the appropriate purpose for this assessment, including, but not necessarily limited to, support for the State Seal of Biliteracy and accountability. It is the intent of the Legislature that an assessment developed pursuant to this section be included in the state accountability system.
(D)The Superintendent shall report and make recommendations to the state board at a regularly scheduled public meeting no sooner than one year after the first full administration of the consortium computer-adaptive assessments in English language arts and mathematics summative assessments in grades 3 to 8, inclusive, and grade 11, regarding an implementation timeline and estimated costs of a stand-alone language arts summative assessment in primary languages other than English.
(E)The Superintendent shall develop, and the state board shall adopt, a primary language assessment. The Superintendent shall administer this assessment no later than the 201617 school year.
(F)This paragraph shall be operative only to the extent that funding is provided in the annual Budget Act or another statute for the purpose of this section.
(c)No later than March 1, 2016, the Superintendent shall submit to the state board recommendations on expanding the CAASPP to include additional assessments, for consideration at a regularly scheduled public meeting. The Superintendent shall also submit these recommendations to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature and to the Director of Finance in accordance with all of the following:
(1)In consultation with stakeholders, including, but not necessarily limited to, California teachers, individuals with expertise in assessing English learners and pupils with disabilities, parents, and measurement experts, the Superintendent shall make recommendations regarding assessments, including the grade level, content, and type of assessment. These recommendations shall take into consideration the assessments already administered or planned pursuant to subdivision (b). The Superintendent shall consider the use of consortium-developed assessments, various item types, computer-based testing, and a timeline for implementation.
(2)The recommendations shall consider assessments in subjects, including, but not necessarily limited to, history-social science, technology, visual and performing arts, and other subjects as appropriate, as well as English language arts, mathematics, and science assessments to augment the assessments required under subdivision (b), and the use of various assessment options, including, but not necessarily limited to, computer-based tests, locally scored performance tasks, and portfolios.
(3)The recommendations shall include the use of an assessment calendar that would schedule the assessments identified pursuant to paragraph (2) over several years, the use of matrix sampling, if appropriate, and the use of population sampling.
(4)The recommendations shall include a timeline for test development, and shall include cost estimates for subject areas, as appropriate.
(5)Upon approval by the state board and the appropriation of funding for this purpose, the Superintendent shall develop and administer approved assessments. The state board shall approve test blueprints, achievement level descriptors, testing periods, performance standards, and a reporting plan for each approved assessment.
(6)The Superintendent shall convene an advisory panel, consisting of, but not necessarily limited to, secondary teachers, school administrators, school board members, parents, a student chosen from among the two finalists who were not appointed by the Governor to serve as the student member on the state board pursuant to Section 33000.5, representatives of a dropout recovery charter school operating pursuant to subdivision (g) of Section 47605.1, measurement experts, and individuals with expertise in assessing English learners and pupils with disabilities, to provide recommendations to the Superintendent on the continuation of the high school exit examination, described in Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 60850), and on alternative pathways to satisfy the high school graduation requirements pursuant to Sections 51224.5 and 51225.3.
(d)For the 201314 and 201415 school years, the department shall make available to local educational agencies Standardized Testing and Reporting Program test forms no longer required by the CAASPP. The cost of implementing this subdivision, including, but not necessarily limited to, shipping, printing, scoring, and reporting per pupil shall be the same for all local educational agencies, and shall not exceed the marginal cost of the assessment, including any cost the department incurs to implement this section. A local educational agency that chooses to administer an assessment pursuant to this subdivision shall do so at its own expense, and shall enter into an agreement for that purpose with a contractor, subject to the approval of the department. (e)(d)The Superintendent shall make available a paper and pencil version of any computer-based CAASPP assessment for use by pupils who are unable to access the computer-based version of the assessment for a maximum of three years after a new operational test is first administered.
(f)(e)(1)From the funds available for that purpose, each local educational agency shall administer assessments to each of its pupils pursuant to subdivision (b). As allowable by federal statute, recently arrived English learner pupils are exempted from taking the assessment in English language arts. The state board shall establish a testing period to provide that all schools administer these tests to pupils at approximately the same time during the instructional year. The testing period established by the state board shall take into consideration the need of local educational agencies to provide makeup days for pupils who were absent during testing, as well as the need to schedule testing on electronic computing devices.
(2)For the 201314 school year, each local educational agency shall administer the field tests in a manner described by the department in consultation with the president or executive director of the state board. Additional participants in the field test beyond the representative sample may be approved by the department, and the department shall use existing contract savings to fund local educational agency participation in one or more tests per participant. Funds for this purpose shall be used to allow for maximum participation in the field tests across the state. To the extent savings in the current contract are not available to fully fund this participation, the department shall prorate available funds by test. Local educational agencies shall bear any additional costs to administer these assessments that are in excess of the contracted amount. With the approval of the state board and the Director of Finance, the department shall amend the existing assessment contract to accommodate field testing beyond the representative sample, and to allow for special studies using information collected from the field tests.
(g)(f)From the funds available for that purpose, each local educational agency shall administer assessments as determined by the state board pursuant to paragraph (5) of subdivision (c).
(h)(g)As feasible, the CAASPP field tests shall be conducted in a manner that will minimize the testing burden on individual schools. The CAASPP field tests shall not produce individual pupil scores unless it is determined that these scores are valid and reliable.
(i)(h)The governing board of a school district may administer achievement tests in grades other than those required by this section as it deems appropriate.
(j)(i)Subject to the approval of the state board, the department may make available to local educational agencies a primary language assessment aligned to the English language arts standards adopted pursuant to Section 60605, as it read on January 1, 2013, for assessing pupils who are enrolled in a dual language immersion program that includes the primary language of the assessment and who are either nonlimited English proficient or redesignated fluent English proficient until a subsequent primary language assessment aligned to the common core standards in English language arts adopted pursuant to Section 60605.8 is developed pursuant to paragraph (5) of subdivision (b). The cost for the assessment shall be the same for all local educational agencies and shall not exceed the marginal cost of the assessment, including any cost the department incurs to implement this section. A local educational agency that elects to administer a primary language assessment pursuant to this subdivision shall do so at its own expense and shall enter into an agreement for that purpose with the state testing contractor, subject to the approval of the department.
(k)(j)Pursuant to Section 1412(a)(16) of Title 20 of the United States Code, individuals with exceptional needs, as defined in Section 56026, shall be included in the testing requirement of subdivision (b) with appropriate accommodations in administration, where necessary, and the individuals with exceptional needs who are unable to participate in the testing, even with accommodations, shall be given an alternate assessment.
(l)(k)(1)The Superintendent shall apportion funds appropriated for these purposes to local educational agencies to enable them to meet the requirements of subdivisions (b) and (c).
(A)For the CAASPP field tests administered in the 201314 school year or later school years, the Superintendent shall apportion funds to local educational agencies if funds are specifically provided for this purpose in the annual Budget Act.(B)The Superintendent shall apportion funds to local educational agencies to enable them to administer assessments used to satisfy the voluntary Early Assessment Program in the 201314 school year pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (b).(2)The state board annually shall establish the amount of funding to be apportioned to local educational agencies for each test administered and annually shall establish the amount that each contractor shall be paid for each test administered under the contracts required pursuant to Section 60643. The amounts to be paid to the contractors shall be determined by considering the cost estimates submitted by each contractor each September and the amount included in the annual Budget Act, and by making allowance for the estimated costs to local educational agencies for compliance with the requirements of subdivisions (b) and (c). The state board shall take into account changes to local educational agency test administration activities under the CAASPP, including, but not limited to, the number and type of tests administered and changes in computerized test registration and administration procedures, when establishing the amount of funding to be apportioned to local educational agencies for each test administered.
(3)An adjustment to the amount of funding to be apportioned per test shall not be valid without the approval of the Director of Finance. A request for approval of an adjustment to the amount of funding to be apportioned per test shall be submitted in writing to the Director of Finance and the chairpersons of the fiscal committees of both houses of the Legislature with accompanying material justifying the proposed adjustment. The Director of Finance is authorized to approve only those adjustments related to activities required by statute. The Director of Finance shall approve or disapprove the amount within 30 days of receipt of the request and shall notify the chairpersons of the fiscal committees of both houses of the Legislature of the decision.
(m)(l)For purposes of making the computations required by Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution, the appropriation for the apportionments made pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (l), (k), and the payments made to the contractors under the contracts required pursuant to Section 60643 or subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 60605 between the department and the contractor, are General Fund revenues appropriated for school districts, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 41202, for the applicable fiscal year, and included within the total allocations to school districts and community college districts from General Fund proceeds of taxes appropriated pursuant to Article XIIIB, as defined in subdivision (e) of Section 41202, for that fiscal year.
(n)(m)As a condition to receiving an apportionment pursuant to subdivision (l), (k), a local educational agency shall report to the Superintendent all of the following:
(1)The pupils enrolled in the local educational agency in the grades in which assessments were administered pursuant to subdivisions (b) and (c).
(2)The pupils to whom an achievement test was administered pursuant to subdivisions (b) and (c) in the local educational agency.
(3)The pupils in paragraph (1) who were exempted from the test pursuant to this section.
(o)(n)The Superintendent and the state board are authorized and encouraged to assist postsecondary educational institutions to use the assessment results of the CAASPP, including, but not necessarily limited to, the grade 11 consortium summative assessments in English language arts and mathematics, for academic credit, placement, or admissions processes.
(p)(o)Subject to the availability of funds in the annual Budget Act for this purpose, and exclusive of the consortium assessments, the Superintendent, with the approval of the state board, annually shall release to the public test items from the achievement tests pursuant to Section 60642.5 administered in previous years. Where feasible and practicable, the minimum number of test items released per year shall be equal to 25 percent of the total number of test items on the test administered in the previous year.
(q)(p)On or before July 1, 2014, Sections 850 to 868, inclusive, of Title 5 of the California Code of Regulations shall be revised by the state board to conform to the changes made to this section in the first year of the 201314 Regular Session. The state board shall adopt initial regulations as emergency regulations to immediately implement the CAASPP assessments, including, but not necessarily limited to, the administration, scoring, and reporting of the tests, as the adoption of emergency regulations is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare within the meaning of Section 11346.1 of the Government Code. The emergency regulations shall be followed by the adoption of permanent regulations, in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code).
SECTION 1.It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation relating to water supply improvements.It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation relating to water supply improvements.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2018 | From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56. |
| Jan 31, 2018 | Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution. |
| May 26, 2017 | In committee: Held under submission. |
| May 17, 2017 | In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file. |
| May 4, 2017 | Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| May 3, 2017 | Read second time and amended. |
| May 2, 2017 | From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 26). |
| Apr 18, 2017 | Re-referred to Com. on ED. |
| Apr 17, 2017 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | Re-referred to Com. on ED. |
| Mar 28, 2017 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended. |
| Mar 27, 2017 | Referred to Com. on ED. |
| Feb 19, 2017 | From printer. May be heard in committee March 21. |
| Feb 17, 2017 | Read first time. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2017 | Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Assembly Standing Committee on Education |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| Edvoice | * For If Amend | May 1, 2017 |
| Long Beach Unified School District | * Support | May 1, 2017 |
Date of Hearing: May 17, 2017
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 1602
Author:(O'Donnell) – As Amended Ver:May 3, 2017
Policy Committee: | Education | Vote: | 7 - 0 |
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY:
This bill establishes the Alternative Grade 11 Assessment Pilot Program to allow participating districts to administer an assessment other than the one required by the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP). Specifically, this bill:
- Requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI) to establish guidelines for accepting up to five school districts to participate in the Alternative Grade 11 Assessment Pilot Program. Specifies that the Long Beach Unified School District will be selected to participate if it applies.
- Requires the assessment to comply with the federal Every Student Succeeds Act.
- Requires participating districts to report test results to the Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI) and report to the SPI, by June 30, 2023, on the effectiveness of the alternative assessment.
- Provides that participating districts will not receive an apportionment for administration of the grade 11 CAASPP.
- Establishes a sunset date of July 1, 2024.
FISCAL EFFECT:
- Approximately $211,000 on-going cost to California Department of Education (CDE). The CDE estimates two half-positions in the Assessment Development and Administration Division will be needed to establish guidelines, draft requests, facilitate the selection of the participating LEAs, prepare test results for the review of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, collect and submit information to the United States Department of Education (ED) for peer review and act as a liaison between the LEAs and the ED. One additional full-time permanent position will also be needed in the Analysis, Measurement and Accountability Reporting Division. This bill will require entering Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) and/or American College Testing (ACT) data into the accountability system and creating a new methodology to incorporate the pilot program data into the College and Career Ready Indicator and align the pilot data with the California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System.
- Potential loss of federal funding due to districts using an assessment that does not comply with the federal Every Students Succeed Act (ESSA) requirements. As amended ESSA requires that states have valid, reliable, and fair assessments aligned with state-determined challenging academic standards. To evaluate assessment programs and individual assessments, ED has developed a process for states to submit evidence for peer review to document that the testing program and its various components meet requirements for validity, reliability and fairness. Among the requirements for peer review is an independent evaluation of the alignment of a given test to the state’s adopted Common Core State Standards (CCSS). No state has been approved through peer review to use alternative assessments as its high school assessment of student achievement. Nor have any independent studies of the alignment of the SAT have been published.
Concerns over loss of federal funds are also related to student data privacy and ESSA provisions that require a State Educational Agency (SEA) to ensure that the total number of students assessed in each subject, using the alternate assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities, do not exceed 1% of the total number of all students in the State who are assessed in such subject. Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), the Individualized Education Program (IEP) team must determine when a child with a significant cognitive disability will participate in an alternate assessment, and notify parents about how their child’s academic achievement will be measured and how participation in the assessment may delay or otherwise affect the student’s completion of the requirements for a regular high school diploma. Any violation of these regulations may jeopardize federal funds.
COMMENTS:
- Background and Purpose. Existing law establishes the CAASPP, which consists of standardized English language arts and math assessments that are aligned to the State Board of Education (SBE) adopted curriculum content standards and administered in grades 3 to 8, inclusive, and grade 11. All LEAs in California are required to administer the CAASPP assessments in the appropriate grades. In addition, the state is in the process of developing a California Science Test (CAST) in compliance with federal requirements. CAST will be administered in grades 5 and 8 and in one grade in high school and is being pilot tested in the spring of 2017. The assessments are developed by the multi-state Smarter Balanced consortium and are aligned to the CCSS, which have been adopted by the SBE. The Smarter Balanced consortium assessments are commonly referred to as SBACs.
This bill is sponsored by the Long Beach Unified School District (LBUSD), which submitted a letter to the president of the SBE on January 17, 2017 requesting a waiver to permit the district to administer the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) instead of the grade 11 SBAC. The district received a reply jointly signed by the SPI and the SBE president stating that the statutory provisions requiring the administration of all CAASPP assessments are not waivable. Accordingly, the district is seeking statutory authorization to administer the alternative assessment instead of the grade 11 SBAC.
- Staff Comment: The LBUSD was denied a waiver to administer the SAT instead of the grade 11 SBAC by the SBE. The SBE and the CDE determined that “allowing the LBUSD to administer the SAT in place of the grade eleven summative assessments would put California’s assessment system and federal funding at great risk.” Furthermore, the state has a responsibility to ensure that proper supports and accommodations are available to pupils. CDE has concerns over proper supports for students with disabilities and English Learners who participate in the assessment pilot.
Analysis Prepared by: Daisy Gonzales / APPR. / (916) 319-2081
Date of Hearing: April 26, 2017
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
Patrick O'Donnell, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 1602 (
Author:O'Donnell) – As Amended Ver:April 17, 2017
SUBJECT: Alternative Grade 11 Assessment Pilot Program
SUMMARY: Establishes the Alternative Grade 11 Assessment Pilot Program to allow participating districts to administer an assessment other than the one required by the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP). Specifically, this bill:
- Establishes the Alternative Grade 11 Assessment Pilot Program.
- Requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI) to establish guidelines for accepting up to five school districts to participate in the pilot program.
- Specifies that the Long Beach Unified School District shall be selected to participate if it applies.
- Provides that participating districts may administer an assessment in grade 11 other than the CAASPP if the following requirements are met:
- The assessment is a statistically reliable and valid norm-referenced or criterion-referenced test;
- The assessment shall be aligned to the academic content standards adopted by the State Board of Education (SBE);
- The administration of the alternative assessment is consistent with the district's local control and accountability plan (LCAP);
- The assessment is administered at no charge to pupils; and
- The assessment is administered to all pupils in grade 11 except those who opt out as allowed by existing law.
- Requires participating districts to do the following:
- Report test results to the Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI) as determined by the SPI;
- Report to the SPI, by June 30, 2022, on the effectiveness of the alternative assessment in all of the following areas:
- Increasing high school graduation rates;
- Increasing enrollment in A-G and Advanced Placement courses;
- Increasing college attendance rates among high school graduates;
- Improving student performance on the assessment; and
- Other areas jointly agreed to by the participating districts and SPI.
- Provides that participating districts shall not receive an apportionment for administration of the grade 11 CAASPP.
- Establishes a sunset date of July 1, 2022.
EXISTING LAW:
- Establishes the CAASPP, which consists of standardized assessments that are aligned to SBE-adopted curriculum content standards and administered in grades 3 to 8, inclusive, and grade 11.
- Requires all local education agencies to administer the CAASPP assessments in the appropriate grades.
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown
COMMENTS: CAASPP was established in 2014 and currently consists of assessments in English language arts and math in grades 3 to 8, inclusive, and grade 11. In addition, the state is in the process of developing a California Science Test (CAST) in compliance with federal requirements. CAST will be administered in grades 5 and 8 and in one grade in high school and is being pilot tested in the spring of 2017. The assessments are developed by the multi-state Smarter Balanced consortium and are aligned to the common core state standards (CCSS), which have been adopted by the SBE. The Smarter Balanced consortium assessments are commonly referred to as SBACs.
This bill is sponsored by the Long Beach Unified School District (LBUSD), which submitted a letter to the president of the SBE on January 17, 2017 requesting a waiver to permit the district to administer the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) instead of the grade 11 SBAC. The district received a reply jointly signed by the SPI and the SBE president stating that the statutory provisions requiring the administration of all CAASPP assessments are not waivable. Accordingly, the district is seeking statutory authorization to administer the alternative assessment instead of the grade 11 SBAC.
Until now, the district has been administering both assessments and believes that the SAT is better for its purposes because, by administering it in grades 10, 11, and 12, it allows pupils to identify deficiencies and receive targeted interventions to improve their performance. And because the SAT has direct consequences for college admission, it is more meaningful to pupils than the SBAC. The district believes that its administration of the SAT has contributed to an increased college attendance rate among its graduates and would like to reduce total test taking time by being relieved of the requirement to administer the SBAC.
In their letter to LBUSD, the SPI and SBE president identified the following concerns with the district's request:
- The SAT may not be aligned to the CCSS;
- The SAT does not provide a reliable and valid measurement across the entire spectrum of pupil performance (for example it is not designed to measure performance at the low end of the spectrum well), which could leave the district open to lawsuits based on discrimination;
- The SAT does not offer disabled students the same set of supports and accommodations as the CAASPP assessments;
- The SAT does not report results on the same scale as the CAASPP assessments;
- Not administering the CAASPP assessment could result in the loss of federal funds; and
- The College Board, which publishes the SAT, has different requirements regarding data ownership and pupil privacy.
The sponsor's responses to SPI/SBE concerns. The bill's sponsor has provided information to committee staff in response to the concerns raised by the SPI and SBE president. The information focuses on the SAT, because that is the test that the sponsor intends to administer in lieu of the grade 11 SBAC.
Alignment to CCSS. The sponsor argues that the SAT focuses on the same skills that the SBAC assesses and is a proven measure of the skills and knowledge that matter most for college and career success. They cite a 2015 study that was conducted by the College Board to assess alignment. That study concluded that "the alignment of the California state standards with the SAT Suite of Assessments is strong to very strong." The sponsor's own experience shows that pupil performance on the SBAC "correlates almost identically with performance on the SAT." For example, 49% of 11th graders met or exceeded benchmarks on both the SAT and the SBAC English language arts assessments, and 28% of 11th graders met or exceeded standards on the SBAC math assessment, while 29% met or exceeded the benchmark on the SAT math.
Validity and reliability. The sponsor argues that the SAT objectively measures academic achievement for all students across the performance spectrum, including very low-performing students, English learners, and students with disabilities. They state that it is the most researched and cited educational assessment in the world, with strong evidence that it is a valid predictor across all student groups of first-year college performance.
Supports and accommodations. According to the sponsor, the College Board recently changed its accommodations policy to make it easier for students to get the supports they need to do their best work. The changes also streamline the process for schools and educators. Beginning January 1, 2017, the vast majority of students who are approved for and using testing accommodations at their school through a current Individualized Education Program (IEP) or 504 Plan will have those same accommodations automatically approved for taking the SAT and other College Board assessments. The College Board also is providing support to English learners. EL students taking a state-funded SAT during the school day will have access to testing instructions in several native languages and approved word-to-word bilingual glossaries. The new accommodations policy complies with the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA).
Comparability with CAASPP assessments. On the grade 11 SBAC, a Level 3 benchmark means a student is ready for entry-level, credit-bearing college courses. The SAT benchmarks are built around the likelihood of a student getting a grade C or better in first-semester college courses. Determining an SAT score that's comparable to a SBAC score would be achieved through a process known as "concordance," which is a proven way to compare scores from different assessments. Concordance tables are used to equate scores between different assessments. The sponsor indicates that it has the commitment of the College Board to create concordance tables between the SAT and the grade 11 SBAC.
Potential loss of federal funds. The sponsor identifies seven states have already received approval from the federal government to use the SAT for federal accountability purposes: Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Michigan, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island.
Student privacy. The College Board complies with the requirements of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), which is the federal law that protects student privacy. Test scores are released to institutions of higher education for admissions purposes only with the approval of the student and only to the institutions the student identifies.
Peer review. Although the bill has no registered opposition, concerns have been raised about whether the alternative assessment that may be administered under the pilot program would be in compliance with the new peer review requirement contained in ESSA. ESSA requires that assessments used for federal accountability purposes be peer reviewed. A peer review is performed on the basis of the administration of an assessment, and therefore cannot be conducted prior to the assessment being administered. Because the SAT was first administered in other states in 2016, it will undergo a peer review in 2017, with results reported in 2018.
The results of the peer review of the SBACs were released in 2017. In a letter to the SPI and the SBE president dates January 18, 2017, the United States Department of Education found that SBAC meets "many, but not all of the statutory and regulatory requirements…of ESSA." The letter requested, among other things, evidence that the SBAC's design aligns to the full depth and breadth for all of the academic content standards in reading/language arts and math at all grade levels.
To address concerns raised regarding the peer review, staff recommends that the bill be amended to require the alternative assessment to be in compliance with ESSA. This would also address the other concerns raised by the SPI and SBE president. Staff also recommends that the bill be amended to change the due date of the report from June 30, 2022 to June 30, 2023 (and make a corresponding change to the sunset date) to allow for five years of data collection.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
EdVoice
Long Beach Unified School District
Opposition
None received
Analysis Prepared by: Rick Pratt / ED. / (916) 319-2087
Discussed in Hearing
Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
Assembly Standing Committee on Education
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):