Bills

AB 2651: Civil actions.

  • Session Year: 2017-2018
  • House: Assembly
  • Latest Version Date: 2018-04-17
Version:

(1)Existing law requires a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication in a civil action or proceeding to be served on all other parties to the action at least 75 days before the hearing on the motion, and requires the motion to be heard no later than 30 days before the date of the trial in the action or proceeding. Existing law requires a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication to include a separate statement of undisputed facts, and opposition papers to include a separate statement that responds to each material fact contended by the moving party to be undisputed. Existing law requires opposition to a motion to be served and filed not less than 14 days before the date of the hearing motion, and a reply to the opposition to be served and filed not less than 5 days before the hearing on the motion. Existing law authorizes the service of opposition and reply papers by personal delivery, facsimile transmission, express mail, or other specified means reasonably calculated to ensure delivery to other parties not later than the close of the next business day after the time the opposition or reply is filed. Existing law provides that a motion for summary adjudication shall be granted only if it completely disposes of a cause of action, and affirmative defense, a claim for damages, or an issue of duty, except that a party may move for summary adjudication of a legal issue or claim for damages other than punitive damages that does not completely dispose of a cause of action, affirmative defense, or issue of duty if the motion is supported by a stipulation of the parties and is in the interest of judicial economy.

This bill would instead require the moving party on a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication to serve the motion at least 35 days before the hearing, unless the court for good cause orders otherwise, and require the motion to be heard no later than 45 days before the date of trial. The bill would authorize the moving party to arrange the separate statement of undisputed facts by cause of action or count, and would require the separate statement filed in support of any opposition to be arranged in the same order as the moving partys separate statement with respect to facts contended to be undisputed. The bill would require opposition to a motion to be filed and served not less than 20 court days before the hearing, and require a reply to be filed and served not less than 10 court days before the hearing. The bill would require opposition and reply papers to be served by personal delivery or electronic service, as specified. The bill would also authorize a party, one time per action, to move for summary adjudication of separate, identifiable, and material legal or factual issues or claims for damages other than punitive damages, whether or not determination of an issue completely disposes of or resolves a cause of action, affirmative defense, claim for damages, or issue of duty.

(2)Existing law authorizes a court to determine a motion for a new trial or a motion to set aside and vacate a judgment within 60 days after the mailing of notice of entry of judgment by the clerk of the court, or 60 days after service on the moving party by any party of written notice of entry of judgment, or, if that notice has not been given, within 60 days after filing the first notice of intention to move for a new trial or to set aside and vacate a judgment.

This bill would extend each of the periods described above to 75 days.

(3)Existing law requires an expert witness who is a party or an employee of a party to an action, or who has been retained by a party for the purpose of forming and expressing an opinion in anticipation of litigation or in preparation for trial of the action, to produce any material or category of materials called for by a deposition notice no later than 3 business days before his or her deposition. Existing law requires the party taking the deposition of an expert witness to either accompany the service of the deposition notice with a tender of the experts fee, or tender that fee at the commencement of the deposition.

This bill would authorize the continuance of the experts deposition if the expert does not timely produce materials, and would require the party designating the expert to be responsible for payment of the experts fee at the continued deposition. The bill would provide that no other experts deposition may be required until the continued deposition is concluded.

(4)Existing law requires a superior court to charge a fee of $30 for the reasonable cost of court reporting services provided in a civil at the expense of the court by an official court reporter for each proceeding anticipated to last one hour or less.This bill would increase that fee to $60.
Authors shown for version:
Amended Assembly (4/17/2018)

Bill Author