Bills

AB 2793: Asbestos tort claims.

  • Session Year: 2017-2018
  • House: Assembly
  • Latest Version Date: 2018-04-30
Version:

(1)Existing law authorizes a party to a civil action to petition the court for preference in the setting of a trial date. Under existing law, the court must grant preference to a party in a civil action who is over 70 years of age and in poor health, as specified. Existing law also permits a court to grant a motion for preference if a party suffers from an illness or condition that could cause the party to die within 6 months and the court finds that justice will be served by granting the preference.

This bill would require a court to grant a plaintiff the trial preference in an asbestos tort action, as defined, if the plaintiff submits a certification under penalty of perjury that he or she has provided certain documents to the defendant that disclose any other legal claims the plaintiff has or might have against an asbestos trust, as specified. Because a false statement on a certification would be punishable as perjury, this bill would expand the scope of an existing crime and would impose a state-mandated local program.

The bill would provide that, for a period of 4 years after entry of a judgment in an asbestos action, the court would retain jurisdiction over the action, and would require the plaintiff to provide to all defendants copies of any additional claims filed against asbestos trusts.

(2)Existing law generally provides that if multiple parties are potentially liable for the same tort, a claimants agreement to discharge one of those parties from liability does not discharge the others from liability, as specified, but does reduce the claims against those parties by the amount stipulated to in, or paid under, the agreement, whichever is greater.

This bill would extend application of this provision to moneys received, or to be received, by or on behalf of a claimant from an asbestos trust, as specified.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Authors shown for version:
Amended Assembly (4/30/2018)

Bill Author