AB 3020: California Environmental Quality Act: exemption.
- Session Year: 2017-2018
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2018-03-22
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA exempts certain projects, including projects undertaken, carried out, or approved by a public agency to maintain, repair, restore, demolish, or replace properties or facilities damaged or destroyed as a result of a disaster in a disaster-stricken area in which a state of emergency has been declared, as specified, and specific actions necessary to prevent or mitigate an emergency.
This bill would expressly exempt from CEQA projects undertaken, carried out, or approved by a public agency to maintain, repair, restore, demolish, or replace properties or facilities damaged or destroyed as a result of fire or flood in a disaster-stricken area and would eliminate the requirement that a state of emergency has been declared for that area. The bill would exempt from CEQA specific actions necessary to reduce the threat or intensity of a wildfire. Because a lead agency would be required to determine whether a project falls within these exemptions, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
The Wildland Fire Protection and Resources Management Act of 1978 requires the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to conduct an experimental program of wildland resources management through prescribed burning and other methods in 2 areas of wildlands, as provided. Existing law establishes definitions to govern the provisions of the act.This bill would make nonsubstantive changes to the provisions of law relating to the definitions.The Wildland Fire Protection and Resources Management Act of 1978 requires the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to conduct an experimental program of wildland resources management through prescribed burning and other methods in 2 areas of wildlands, as provided. Existing law establishes definitions to govern the provisions of the act.
This bill would make nonsubstantive changes to the provisions of law relating to the definitions.
(a)Except as otherwise provided in this division, this division shall apply to discretionary projects proposed to be carried out or approved by public agencies, including, but not limited to, the enactment and amendment of zoning ordinances, the issuance of zoning variances, the issuance of conditional use permits, and the approval of tentative subdivision maps unless the project is exempt from this division.
(b)This division does not apply to any of the following activities:
(1)Ministerial projects proposed to be carried out or approved by public agencies.
(2)Emergency repairs to public service facilities necessary to maintain service.
(3)Projects undertaken, carried out, or approved by a public agency to maintain, repair, restore, demolish, or replace property or facilities damaged or destroyed as a result of a fire, flood, or other disaster in a disaster-stricken area in which a state of emergency has been proclaimed by the Governor pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 8550) of Division 1 of Title 2 of the Government Code. area.
(4)Specific actions necessary to prevent or mitigate an emergency. emergency or to reduce the threat or intensity of a wildfire.
(5)Projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves.
(6)Actions undertaken by a public agency relating to any thermal powerplant site or facility, including the expenditure, obligation, or encumbrance of funds by a public agency for planning, engineering, or design purposes, or for the conditional sale or purchase of equipment, fuel, water (except groundwater), steam, or power for a thermal powerplant, if the powerplant site and related facility will be the subject of an environmental impact report, negative declaration, or other document, prepared pursuant to a regulatory program certified pursuant to Section 21080.5, which will be prepared by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, by the Public Utilities Commission, or by the city or county in which the powerplant and related facility would be located if the environmental impact report, negative declaration, or document includes the environmental impact, if any, of the action described in this paragraph.
(7)Activities or approvals necessary to the bidding for, hosting or staging of, and funding or carrying out of, an Olympic games under the authority of the International Olympic Committee, except for the construction of facilities necessary for the Olympic games.
(8)The establishment, modification, structuring, restructuring, or approval of rates, tolls, fares, or other charges by public agencies which the public agency finds are for the purpose of (A) meeting operating expenses, including employee wage rates and fringe benefits, (B) purchasing or leasing supplies, equipment, or materials, (C) meeting financial reserve needs and requirements, (D) obtaining funds for capital projects necessary to maintain service within existing service areas, or (E) obtaining funds necessary to maintain those intracity transfers as are authorized by city charter. The public agency shall incorporate written findings in the record of any proceeding in which an exemption under this paragraph is claimed setting forth with specificity the basis for the claim of exemption.
(9)All classes of projects designated pursuant to Section 21084.
(10)A project for the institution or increase of passenger or commuter services on rail or highway rights-of-way already in use, including modernization of existing stations and parking facilities. For purposes of this paragraph, highway shall have the same meaning as defined in Section 360 of the Vehicle Code.
(11)A project for the institution or increase of passenger or commuter service on high-occupancy vehicle lanes already in use, including the modernization of existing stations and parking facilities.
(12)Facility extensions not to exceed four miles in length which are required for the transfer of passengers from or to exclusive public mass transit guideway or busway public transit services.
(13)A project for the development of a regional transportation improvement program, the state transportation improvement program, or a congestion management program prepared pursuant to Section 65089 of the Government Code.
(14)Any project or portion thereof located in another state which will be subject to environmental impact review pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 4321 et seq.) or similar state laws of that state. Any emissions or discharges that would have a significant effect on the environment in this state are subject to this division.
(15)Projects undertaken by a local agency to implement a rule or regulation imposed by a state agency, board, or commission under a certified regulatory program pursuant to Section 21080.5. Any site-specific effect of the project which was not analyzed as a significant effect on the environment in the plan or other written documentation required by Section 21080.5 is subject to this division.
(c)If a lead agency determines that a proposed project, not otherwise exempt from this division, would not have a significant effect on the environment, the lead agency shall adopt a negative declaration to that effect. The negative declaration shall be prepared for the proposed project in either of the following circumstances:
(1)There is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the lead agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment.
(2)An initial study identifies potentially significant effects on the environment, but (A) revisions in the project plans or proposals made by, or agreed to by, the applicant before the proposed negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment would occur, and (B) there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the lead agency, that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment.
(d)If there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the lead agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, an environmental impact report shall be prepared.
(e)(1)For the purposes of this section and this division, substantial evidence includes fact, a reasonable assumption predicated upon fact, or expert opinion supported by fact.
(2)Substantial evidence is not argument, speculation, unsubstantiated opinion or narrative, evidence that is clearly inaccurate or erroneous, or evidence of social or economic impacts that do not contribute to, or are not caused by, physical impacts on the environment.
(f)As a result of the public review process for a mitigated negative declaration, including administrative decisions and public hearings, the lead agency may conclude that certain mitigation measures identified pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) are infeasible or otherwise undesirable. In those circumstances, the lead agency, prior to approving the project, may delete those mitigation measures and substitute for them other mitigation measures that the lead agency finds, after holding a public hearing on the matter, are equivalent or more effective in mitigating significant effects on the environment to a less than significant level and that do not cause any potentially significant effect on the environment. If those new mitigation measures are made conditions of project approval or are otherwise made part of the project approval, the deletion of the former measures and the substitution of the new mitigation measures shall not constitute an action or circumstance requiring recirculation of the mitigated negative declaration.
(g)Nothing in this section shall preclude a project applicant or any other person from challenging, in an administrative or judicial proceeding, the legality of a condition of project approval imposed by the lead agency. If, however, any condition of project approval set aside by either an administrative body or court was necessary to avoid or lessen the likelihood of the occurrence of a significant effect on the environment, the lead agencys approval of the negative declaration and project shall be invalid and a new environmental review process shall be conducted before the project can be reapproved, unless the lead agency substitutes a new condition that the lead agency finds, after holding a public hearing on the matter, is equivalent to, or more effective in, lessening or avoiding significant effects on the environment and that does not cause any potentially significant effect on the environment.
SEC. 2.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
SECTION 1.Section 4464 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:4464.Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the following definitions govern the construction of this chapter:(a)Hazardous fuel reduction means the application of practices to wild lands, the primary impact of which to the vegetation is generally limited to the reduction of surface and ladder wild land fuels. These practices include, but are not limited to, prescribed fire, piling by machine or by hand in preparation for burning, thinning, pruning, or grazing. Treatments that reduce crown densities shall be prescribed only for the purpose of impacting fire behavior, and if it can be reasonably concluded, based on the proposed treatment, that the likelihood for the formation of crown fires is reduced.(b)Nonprofit organization means a California corporation organized pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(4) of the federal Internal Revenue Code.(c)Person means a natural person, firm, association, partnership, business trust, corporation, limited liability company, company, nonprofit organization, or a combination of those, or a public agency other than an agency of the federal government.(d)Prescribed burn crew means personnel and firefighting equipment of the department that are prepared to contain fire set in a prescribed burning operation and to suppress any fire that escapes during a prescribed burning operation.(e)Prescribed burning or prescribed burning operation means the planned application and confinement of fire to wild land fuels on lands selected in advance of that application to achieve any of the following objectives:(1)Prevention of high-intensity wild land fires through reduction of the volume and continuity of wild land fuels.(2)Watershed management.(3)Range improvement.(4)Vegetation management.(5)Forest improvement.(6)Wildlife habitat improvement.(7)Air quality maintenance.(f)Wild land means land that is classified as a state responsibility area pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 4125) of Chapter 1 and includes land having a flammable plant cover. Wild land also means land not classified as a state responsibility area where the geographic location of these lands and accumulation of wild land fuel is such that a wild land fire occurring on these lands would pose a threat to a state responsibility area.(g)Wild land fire means an uncontrolled fire burning on wild land.(h)Wild land fuel means timber, brush, grass, or other flammable vegetation, living or dead, standing or down.Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the following definitions govern the construction of this chapter:
(a)Hazardous fuel reduction means the application of practices to wild lands, the primary impact of which to the vegetation is generally limited to the reduction of surface and ladder wild land fuels. These practices include, but are not limited to, prescribed fire, piling by machine or by hand in preparation for burning, thinning, pruning, or grazing. Treatments that reduce crown densities shall be prescribed only for the purpose of impacting fire behavior, and if it can be reasonably concluded, based on the proposed treatment, that the likelihood for the formation of crown fires is reduced.
(b)Nonprofit organization means any a California corporation organized under pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(4) of the federal Internal Revenue Code.
(c)Person means any a natural person, firm, association, partnership, business trust, corporation, limited liability company, company, nonprofit organization, or a combination of those, or any a public agency other than an agency of the federal government.
(d)Prescribed burn crew means personnel and firefighting equipment of the department that are prepared to contain fire set in a prescribed burning operation and to suppress any fire that escapes during a prescribed burning operation.
(e)Prescribed burning or prescribed burning operation means the planned application and confinement of fire to wild land fuels on lands selected in advance of that application to achieve any of the following objectives:
(1)Prevention of high-intensity wild land fires through reduction of the volume and continuity of wild land fuels.
(2)Watershed management.
(3)Range improvement.
(4)Vegetation management.
(5)Forest improvement.
(6)Wildlife habitat improvement.
(7)Air quality maintenance.
(f)Wild land means any land that is classified as a state responsibility area pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 4125) of Chapter 1 and includes any land having a flammable plant cover. Wild land also means any land not classified as a state responsibility area where the geographic location of these lands and accumulation of wild land fuel is such that a wild land fire occurring on these lands would pose a threat to a state responsibility area.
(g)Wild land fire means any an uncontrolled fire burning on wild land.
(h)Wild land fuel means any timber, brush, grass, or other flammable vegetation, living or dead, standing or down.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2018 | In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. |
| Apr 2, 2018 | Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES. |
| Mar 22, 2018 | Referred to Com. on NAT. RES. |
| Feb 17, 2018 | From printer. May be heard in committee March 19. |
| Feb 16, 2018 | Read first time. To print. |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| California Association Of Realtors | ** Support | Apr 20, 2018 |
| California League Of Conservation Voters | ** Against | Apr 20, 2018 |
| Center For Biological Diversity | ** Against | Apr 20, 2018 |
| Rural County Representative of California | ** Support | Apr 20, 2018 |
| Sierra Club California | ** Against | Apr 20, 2018 |
Date of Hearing: April 23, 2018
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES
Al Muratsuchi, Acting Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 3020 (
Author:Flora) – As Amended Ver:March 22, 2018
SUBJECT: California Environmental Quality Act: exemption
SUMMARY: Establishes an exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for undefined actions to reduce the threat or intensity of a wildfire and revises the existing emergency exemption by repealing the requirement that it apply only in an area where the Governor has declared an emergency.
EXISTING LAW:
- Requires lead agencies with the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a proposed project to prepare a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report (EIR) for this action, unless the project is exempt from CEQA (CEQA includes various statutory exemptions, as well as categorical exemptions in the CEQA guidelines).
- Exempts from CEQA:
- Projects undertaken, carried out, or approved by a public agency to maintain, repair, restore, demolish, or replace property or facilities damaged or destroyed as a result of a disaster in a disaster-stricken area in which a state of emergency has been proclaimed by the Governor.
- Emergency repairs to publicly- or privately-owned service facilities necessary to maintain service essential to the public health, safety, or welfare.
- Specific actions necessary to prevent or mitigate an emergency. (This does not include long-term projects undertaken for the purpose of preventing or mitigating a situation that has a low probability of occurrence in the short term.)
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown
COMMENTS:
- Background. CEQA provides a process for evaluating the environmental effects of applicable projects undertaken or approved by public agencies. If a project is not exempt from CEQA, an initial study is prepared to determine whether the project may have a significant effect on the environment. If the initial study shows that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment, the lead agency must prepare a negative declaration. If the initial study shows that the project may have a significant effect, the lead agency must prepare an EIR.
Generally, an EIR must accurately describe the proposed project, identify and analyze each significant environmental impact expected to result from the proposed project, identify mitigation measures to reduce those impacts to the extent feasible, and evaluate a range of reasonable alternatives to the proposed project. Prior to approving any project that has received environmental review, an agency must make certain findings. If mitigation measures are required or incorporated into a project, the agency must adopt a reporting or monitoring program to ensure compliance with those measures.
- Author's statement:
To accommodate instances of natural disaster, CEQA exempts certain projects aimed at repairing or rebuilding damages incurred in a disaster-stricken area in which a state of emergency has been declared by the Governor. While this exemption has been impactful for certain disasters, CEQA relief is not applicable for numerous fire or flood related disasters and has therefore not effectively diminished the costs or time it takes to rebuild from disasters.
Additionally, existing law exempts actions intended to reduce, or prevent an emergency from CEQA requirements. Yet it does not specify CEQA relief for efforts taken to diminish the risks and dangers of fires or floods, once again failing to adequately assist in preventing fire and floods.
In the wake of one of the worst fire seasons in California history, the state is still recovering from the destruction and devastation caused by massive wildfires. AB 3020 will help diminish the costs of repairing, restoring, demolishing or replacing property destroyed or damaged by a fire, by changing the requirement for a state of emergency for CEQA relief, designating relief to any area devastated by a fire, flood or other disaster.
AB 3020 will not only lesson the costs of rebuilding but it will also expedite the process, allowing rebuilding efforts to be implemented quicker in the wake of a disaster. Additionally, AB 3020 would help California better prepare for and mitigate the chances of future wildfires and floods by allowing relief from CEQA requirements for actions necessary to reduce the threat or intensity of a wildfire and floods.
- Bill goes far beyond rebuilding from disasters. The bill expands the existing emergency exemption in two significant ways. First, the bill repeals the requirement that the exemption apply only in an area where the Governor has declared an emergency. This leaves no objective definition of "disaster" and invites inconsistent use by local agencies self-declaring disasters to use the exemption.
Second, the bill adds an exemption for "specific actions necessary…to reduce the threat or intensity of wildfire." This invites use of the exemption for a broad and unpredictable range of non-emergency projects, including timber harvest and road construction.
- Related legislation. AB 2267 (Wood), pending in this committee, establishes an exemption from CEQA for reconstruction of wildfire-damaged housing, expanding an existing categorical exemption to allow a 50% increase in density.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
California Association of Realtors
Rural County Representative of California
Opposition
California League of Conservation Voters
Center for Biological Diversity
Sierra Club California
Analysis Prepared by: Lawrence Lingbloom / NAT. RES. /
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):