SB 170: Child custody: preferences of the child.

Version:

Existing law requires the court to consider, and give due weight to, the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody or visitation if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation. If the child is 14 years of age or older and wishes to address the court regarding custody or visitation, existing law requires the court to permit the child to address the court, unless the court determines that doing so is not in the childs best interests.

This bill would instead require the court to permit a child who is 10 years of age or older to address the court regarding custody or visitation, unless the court determines that doing so is not in the childs best interest.

Version:

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1.Section 3042 of the Family Code is amended to read:3042.

(a)If a child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation, the court shall consider, and give due weight to, the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody or visitation.

(b)In addition to the requirements of subdivision (b) of Section 765 of the Evidence Code, the court shall control the examination of a child witness so as to protect the best interests of the child.

(c)If the child is 14 10 years of age or older and wishes to address the court regarding custody or visitation, the child shall be permitted to do so, unless the court determines that doing so is not in the childs best interests. In that case, the court shall state its reasons for that finding on the record.

(d)Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to prevent a child who is less than 14 10 years of age from addressing the court regarding custody or visitation, if the court determines that is appropriate pursuant to the childs best interests.

(e)If the court precludes the calling of any child as a witness, the court shall provide alternative means of obtaining input from the child and other information regarding the childs preferences.

(f)To assist the court in determining whether the child wishes to express his or her preference or to provide other input regarding custody or visitation to the court, a minors counsel, an evaluator, an investigator, or a mediator who provides recommendations to the judge pursuant to Section 3183 shall indicate to the judge that the child wishes to address the court, or the judge may make that inquiry in the absence of that request. A party or a partys attorney may also indicate to the judge that the child wishes to address the court or judge.

(g)Nothing in this section shall be construed to require the child to express to the court his or her preference or to provide other input regarding custody or visitation.

(h)The Judicial Council shall, no later than January 1, 2012, promulgate a rule of court establishing procedures for the examination of a child witness, and include guidelines on methods other than direct testimony for obtaining information or other input from the child regarding custody or visitation.

(i)The changes made to subdivisions (a) to (g), inclusive, by the act adding this subdivision shall become operative on January 1, 2012.

Date	Status
Feb 1, 2018	Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
Jan 10, 2018	January 9 set for second hearing canceled at the request of author.
Dec 21, 2017	Set for hearing January 9.
May 8, 2017	May 9 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
May 1, 2017	Set for hearing May 9.
Feb 2, 2017	Referred to Com. on JUD.
Jan 24, 2017	From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 23.
Jan 23, 2017	Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Authors shown for version:
Introduced (1/23/2017)