Bills

AB 1379: Online platforms: disclosures.

  • Session Year: 2021-2022
  • House: Assembly
  • Latest Version Date: 2021-04-12
Version:
Existing law prohibits a person, among others, from making or disseminating in any advertising device, or in any manner or means whatsoever, including over the internet, any statement concerning real or personal property or services that is untrue or misleading, as specified. Existing law defines libel as a false and unprivileged publication, including by writing, printing, or picture, that exposes any person to hatred, contempt, and ridicule, among other things.This bill would prohibit a social media platform from amplifying, in a manner that violates its terms of service or written public promises, content that is in violation of the platforms terms of service. The bill would require a social media platform to provide its users with one or more tools to allow a user to report a posting that contains content the user believes has been amplified in violation of that provision and would require a social media platform to provide, at the request of the Attorney General, the number of those reports made by users and any actions taken by the social media platform in response to those reports. The bill would subject a person who violates these provisions to a civil penalty of $1 for each discrete violation, as specified, and would authorize certain public attorneys, including the Attorney General, to bring an action to enforce that penalty, as specified. The bill would also authorize a person who has seen or heard content amplified in violation of the bill to bring a civil action to enforce the penalty only with respect to the content amplification prohibition described above.Existing law, until January 1, 2023, prohibits a person, committee, or other entity, within 60 days of an election at which a candidate for elective office will appear on the ballot, from distributing with actual malice materially deceptive audio or visual media of the candidate with the intent to injure the candidates reputation or to deceive a voter into voting for or against the candidate, unless the media includes a disclosure stating that the media has been manipulated. This bill, until January 1, 2025, would prohibit a committee, within 60 days of an election at which a candidate or measure will appear on the ballot, from distributing, with actual malice, a false material statement of fact relating to the candidate or measure with the intent to deceive a voter into voting for or against the candidate or measure. The bill would prohibit an online platform from knowingly promoting, recommending, or encouraging consumption of such statements. The bill would authorize a person to seek injunctive or other equitable relief, and general or special damages, and would authorize the court to award a prevailing party reasonable attorneys fees and costs. This bill would require a court to place such proceedings on the calendar in the order of their date of filing and give them precedence.This bill would require online platforms to provide users with one or more tools to allow the user to report a posting that contains a statement the user believes is in violation of the requirements of the bill. At the request of the Attorney General, the online platform would be required to provide to the Attorney General a list of these reports and any actions taken by the online platform in response to those reports.

The Political Reform Act of 1974 provides for the comprehensive regulation of campaign financing and activities by the Fair Political Practices Commission. Under the act, political advertisements on online platforms are required to contain certain disclosure statements.

This bill would require an online platform to maintain and make available for online public inspection a description of the audience requested by the committee and the types of personal information, as defined, used by the online platform to target the advertisement, including use by the online platform of characteristics such as age, gender, race, or other protected classifications under law. The online platforms chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief operating officer, chief privacy officer, or the equivalent position of any of these officers, if applicable, would be required to personally certify, under penalty of perjury, that to their knowledge the online platform has correctly disclosed all activity under this law. By expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. In addition, because a violation of the act is subject to criminal penalties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the acts criminal penalties.

This bill would also require an online platform that has 10,000,000 or more unique monthly United States visitors or users for a majority of months during the preceding 12 months that targets political advertising, as described above, to make available an application programming interface or other technical capability to enable qualified third parties to conduct independent analysis of bias and unlawful discriminatory impact of that targeted advertising.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the acts purposes upon a 2/3 vote of each house of the Legislature and compliance with specified procedural requirements.

This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act.

Authors shown for version:
Amended Assembly (4/12/2021)

Bill Author