AB 1086: Joint Exercise of Powers Act: Sacramento County Partnership on Homelessness.
- Session Year: 2023-2024
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2023-06-19
Current Status:
Failed
(2024-02-01: From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.)
Introduced
In Committee
First Chamber
In Committee
Second Chamber
Enacted
What does this bill do?
This bill allows Sacramento County and the cities of Sacramento, Rancho Cordova, Elk Grove, Citrus Heights, and Folsom to create a shared agency called the Sacramento County Partnership on Homelessness to help people experiencing homelessness, coordinate local responses, and develop a regional strategic plan. The partnership would be run by a six-member board with one elected official appointed from each member jurisdiction, have an executive director as a nonvoting CEO/board secretary, and must follow any rules tied to state funding it receives.
The summary is provided by generative AI which can make mistakes. For original language, please view the details in the table below.
The Joint Exercise of Powers Act authorizes 2 or more public agencies, by agreement, to form a joint powers authority to exercise any power common to the contracting parties, as specified. Existing law requires the agreement to set forth its purpose or the power to be exercised, among other things.
This bill would authorize the County of Sacramento and the Cities of Sacramento, Rancho Cordova, Elk Grove, Citrus Heights, and Folsom to enter into a joint powers agreement pursuant to the act to create and operate a joint powers agency, named the Sacramento County Partnership on Homelessness, to assist the homeless population, to coordinate homelessness response, and to develop and manage a comprehensive strategic plan to address homelessness within the jurisdiction of its member cities and county. The bill would set forth the composition and voting procedures of the partnerships board of directors and would require the partnership to comply with the regulatory guidelines of each specific state funding source received.
This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Sacramento and the Cities of Sacramento, Rancho Cordova, Elk Grove, Citrus Heights, and Folsom.
Existing law establishes various prohibitions against eavesdropping and recording or intercepting certain communications. Violations of these prohibitions are crimes. Under existing law, specified law enforcement officers are not prohibited by those provisions from overhearing or recording certain communications.This bill would similarly provide that the provisions prohibiting eavesdropping and recording or intercepting certain communications do not prohibit an employee or agent of the Civil Rights Department or a fair housing enforcement organization, as defined, from recording a communication for the purpose of investigating and obtaining evidence reasonably believed to relate to the commission of discriminatory housing practices by another party to the communication.Existing law establishes various prohibitions against eavesdropping and recording or intercepting certain communications. Violations of these prohibitions are crimes. Under existing law, specified law enforcement officers are not prohibited by those provisions from overhearing or recording certain communications.
This bill would similarly provide that the provisions prohibiting eavesdropping and recording or intercepting certain communications do not prohibit an agent employee or agent of the Civil Rights Department or an investigator or tester for a fair housing enforcement organization, as defined, from recording a communication for the purpose of investigating and obtaining evidence reasonably believed to relate to the commission of discriminatory housing practices by another party to the communication.
Existing law establishes various prohibitions against eavesdropping and recording or intercepting certain communications. Violations of these prohibitions are crimes. Under existing law, specified law enforcement officers are not prohibited by those provisions from overhearing or recording certain communications.
This bill would similarly provide that the provisions prohibiting eavesdropping and recording or intercepting certain communications do not prohibit an agent of the Civil Rights Department or an investigator or tester for a fair housing enforcement organization, as defined, from recording a communication for the purpose of investigating and obtaining evidence reasonably believed to relate to the commission of discriminatory housing practices by another party to the communication.
(a)(1)Notwithstanding any law, the County of Sacramento and the Cities of Sacramento, Rancho Cordova, Elk Grove, Citrus Heights, and Folsom may enter into a joint powers agreement pursuant to this chapter to create and operate a joint powers agency to assist the homeless population, to coordinate homelessness response, and to develop and manage a comprehensive strategic plan to address homelessness within the jurisdiction of its member cities and county.
(2)The joint powers agency created pursuant to this section shall be known as the Sacramento County Partnership on Homelessness, and shall be created and operate pursuant to this section.
(b)(1)The Sacramento County Partnership on Homelessness shall be governed by a board of directors consisting of six directors, as follows:
(A)One member of the board of directors shall be a currently serving member of the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors and shall be appointed by that board of supervisors.
(B)One member of the board of directors shall be a currently serving member of the City Council of the City of Sacramento and shall be appointed by that city council.
(C)One member of the board of directors shall be a currently serving member of the City Council of the City of Elk Grove and shall be appointed by that city council.
(D)One member of the board of directors shall be a currently serving member of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova and shall be appointed by that city council.
(E)One member of the board of directors shall be a currently serving member of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights and shall be appointed by that city council.
(F)One member of the board of directors shall be a currently serving member of the City Council of the City of Folsom and shall be appointed by that city council.
(2)The voting procedures of the partnerships board of directors may be determined by taking into consideration the population of each county and city that is a member of the partnership.
(3)An executive director shall serve as the partnerships chief executive officer and as the secretary of the board of directors, but shall not have voting rights. Actual expenses shall be approved before they are incurred.
(c)The Sacramento County Partnership on Homelessness shall comply with the regulatory guidelines of each specific state funding source received.
SEC. 2.The Legislature finds and declares that a special statute is necessary and that a general statute cannot be made applicable within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California Constitution because of the unique circumstances facing the County of Sacramento and the Cities of Sacramento, Rancho Cordova, Elk Grove, Citrus Heights, and Folsom with regard to homelessness.
SECTION 1.The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a)Housing is the linchpin to opportunity in California and the United States. Where people live is inextricably linked to their educational attainment, employment opportunities, health, and the wealth they can obtain and pass on to their children and grandchildren.(b)Systemic segregation in communities throughout California and discrimination in housing continue to this day, due to federal, state, and local governmental and private industrys policies and practices, such as redlining, racially restrictive covenants, and discrimination in access to home loans.(c)Correcting historic inequities in housing and zoning, including racial discrimination, is an issue of critical importance, especially given the current housing crisis in California.(d)Enforcement of fair housing laws is critical to the advancement of racial justice.(e)The federal government has recognized that certain organizations, and their employees, have a critical role to play in the enforcement of fair housing laws, and has therefore designated certain organizations under federal law as fair housing enforcement organizations.(f)The use of testing is an essential critical methodology in investigating compliance with and enforcing violations of fair housing laws and an essential tool to prove housing discrimination has occurred.(g)The recording of the murder of George Floyd and other victims of police brutality allowed prosecutors to successfully obtain jury verdicts against the perpetrators. Without the video recording of the interactions between the police and George Floyd, the perpetrators would have never been brought to justice. The same is true of recording of fair housing tests. There is no substitute for the audio and video recording of fair housing tests.(h)Recordings collected by agents or employees of the Civil Rights Department or qualified fair housing enforcement organizations are an important tool for investigation, enforcement, and accountability.(i)The Budget Act of 2022 included an appropriation to the Civil Rights Department to conduct fair housing testing.SEC. 2.Section 633.7 is added to the Penal Code, to read:633.7.(a)Sections 631, 632, 632.5, 632.6, and 632.7 do not prohibit one party to a confidential communication from recording the communication if the party is an employee or agent of the Civil Rights Department or a qualified fair housing enforcement organization, including a contractor or subcontractor thereto, who is acting within the scope of their employment, agency, or contract and the recording is made for the purpose of investigating and obtaining evidence reasonably believed to relate to the commission of discriminatory housing practices by another party to the communication.(b)A person described in subdivision (a) may record a confidential conversation pursuant to this section, by means of any electronic recording device, including audio and video recording, whether the communication is carried on among the parties in the presence of one another or by means of a telephone or other device. For purposes of this subdivision, any electronic recording device means a recording device that remains on or with the investigator or tester and does not include a recording device that a person leaves behind and later retrieves for purposes of eavesdropping upon the confidential communications of others.(c)(1)The provisions of Sections 631, 632, 632.5, 632.6, and 632.7 do not make any evidence obtained under this section inadmissible in any judicial, administrative, legislative, or other proceeding relating to an alleged discriminatory housing practice.(2)A recording made pursuant to this section shall only be used in judicial or administrative enforcement proceedings, including conciliation, mediation, or other settlement negotiations, as well as conciliation, mediation, or other settlement discussions in anticipation of filing enforcement actions.(3)An agent or employee of the Civil Rights Department or a qualified fair housing enforcement organization may release a recording made pursuant to this section to the Civil Rights Department or qualified fair housing enforcement organization.(d)As used in this section, the following terms are defined as follows:(1)Discriminatory housing practice means any unlawful conduct as described in Section 12955 of the Government Code or any regulation adopted thereto, or a discriminatory housing practice as defined in subdivision (f) of Section 3602 of Title 42 of the United States Code, or any regulation adopted thereto.(2)Qualified fair housing enforcement organization has the same meaning as in Section 125.103 of Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations.(3)Tester means a person who poses as a prospective renter, borrower, or patron for the purpose of gathering information for the purpose of assessing compliance with civil rights laws.The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)Housing is the linchpin to opportunity in California and the United States. Where people live is inextricably linked to their educational attainment, employment opportunities, health, and the wealth they can obtain and pass on to their children and grandchildren.
(b)Systemic segregation in communities throughout California and discrimination in housing continue to this day, due to federal, state, and local governmental and private industrys policies and practices, such as redlining, racially restrictive covenants, and discrimination in access to home loans.
(c)Correcting historic inequities in housing and zoning, including racial discrimination, is an issue of critical importance, especially given the current housing crisis in California.
(d)Enforcement of fair housing laws is critical to the advancement of racial justice.
(e)The federal government has recognized that certain organizations, and their employees, have a critical role to play in the enforcement of fair housing laws, and has therefore designated certain organizations under federal law as fair housing enforcement organizations.
(f)The use of testing is an essential critical methodology in investigating compliance with and enforcing violations of fair housing laws and an essential tool to prove housing discrimination has occurred.
(g)The recording of the murder of George Floyd and other victims of police brutality allowed prosecutors to successfully obtain jury verdicts against the perpetrators. Without the video recording of the interactions between the police and George Floyd, the perpetrators would have never been brought to justice. The same is true of recording of fair housing tests. There is no substitute for the audio and video recording of fair housing tests.
(h)Recordings collected by agents or employees of the Civil Rights Department or qualified fair housing enforcement organizations are an important tool for investigation, enforcement, and accountability.
(i)The Budget Act of 2022 included an appropriation to the Civil Rights Department to conduct fair housing testing.
SEC. 2.Section 633.7 is added to the Penal Code, to read:633.7.(a)Sections 631, 632, 632.5, 632.6, and 632.7 do not prohibit one party to a confidential communication from recording the communication if the party is a person acting within the scope of their employment as an agent of the Civil Rights Department, or as an investigator or tester for a qualified fair housing enforcement organization, as defined in Section 125.103 of Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations, an employee or agent of the Civil Rights Department or a qualified fair housing enforcement organization, including a contractor or subcontractor thereto, who is acting within the scope of their employment, agency, or contract and the recording is made for the purpose of investigating and obtaining evidence reasonably believed to relate to the commission of discriminatory housing practices by another party to the communication.
(b)A person described in subdivision (a) may record a confidential conversation pursuant to this section, by means of any electronic recording device, including audio and video recording, whether the communication is carried on among the parties in the presence of one another or by means of a telephone or other device. For purposes of this subdivision, any electronic recording device means a recording device that remains on or with the investigator or tester and does not include a recording device that a person leaves behind and later retrieves for purposes of eavesdropping upon the confidential communications of others.
(c)(1)The provisions of Sections 631, 632, 632.5, 632.6, and 632.7 do not make any evidence obtained under this section inadmissible in any judicial, administrative, legislative, or other proceeding relating to an alleged discriminatory housing practice.
(2)The recording of the contents of any confidential communication made pursuant to this section shall not, without the permission of the persons recorded, or unless directed by the lawful order of a court, be disclosed except as evidence in a judicial or administrative enforcement proceeding. For its use in a proceeding, the recording shall be edited to redact confidential conversations of third parties who were not the target of the recording or whose communications or other identifying information are not relevant to the commission of the alleged discriminatory housing practice.(2)A recording made pursuant to this section shall only be used in judicial or administrative enforcement proceedings, including conciliation, mediation, or other settlement negotiations, as well as conciliation, mediation, or other settlement discussions in anticipation of filing enforcement actions.
(3)An agent or employee of the Civil Rights Department or a qualified fair housing enforcement organization may release a recording made pursuant to this section to the Civil Rights Department or qualified fair housing enforcement organization.
(d)As used in this section, the following terms are defined as follows:
(1)Discriminatory housing practice means any unlawful conduct as described in Section 12955 of the Government Code or any regulation adopted thereto, or a discriminatory housing practice as defined in subdivision (f) of Section 3602 of Title 42 of the United States Code. Code, or any regulation adopted thereto.
(2)Qualified fair housing enforcement organization has the same meaning as in Section 125.103 of Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
(2)(3)Tester means a person who, without any bona fide intent to rent or purchase housing, purchase a mortgage or vehicle loan, or patronize a place of public accommodation, who poses as a prospective renter, borrower, or patron for the purpose of gathering information for the purpose of assessing compliance with civil rights laws.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)Housing is the linchpin to opportunity in California and the United States. Where people live is inextricably linked to their educational attainment, employment opportunities, health, and the wealth they can obtain and pass on to their children and grandchildren.
(b)Systemic segregation in communities throughout California and discrimination in housing continue to this day, due to federal, state, and local governmental and private industrys policies and practices, such as redlining, racially restrictive covenants, and discrimination in access to home loans.
(c)Correcting historic inequities in housing and zoning, including racial discrimination, is an issue of critical importance, especially given the current housing crisis in California.
(d)Enforcement of fair housing laws is critical to the advancement of racial justice.
(e)The federal government has recognized that certain organizations, and their employees, have a critical role to play in the enforcement of fair housing laws, and has therefore designated certain organizations under federal law as fair housing enforcement organizations.
(f)The use of testing is an essential critical methodology in investigating compliance with and enforcing violations of fair housing laws and an essential tool to prove housing discrimination has occurred.
(g)The recording of the murder of George Floyd and other victims of police brutality allowed prosecutors to successfully obtain jury verdicts against the perpetrators. Without the video recording of the interactions between the police and George Floyd, the perpetrators would have never been brought to justice. The same is true of recording of fair housing tests. There is no substitute for the audio and video recording of fair housing tests.
(h)Recordings collected by agents or employees of the Civil Rights Department or qualified fair housing enforcement organizations are an important tool for investigation, enforcement, and accountability.
SEC. 2.Section 633.7 is added to the Penal Code, to read:633.7.(a)Sections 631, 632, 632.5, 632.6, and 632.7 do not prohibit one party to a confidential communication from recording the communication if the party is a person acting within the scope of their employment as an agent of the Civil Rights Department, or as an investigator or tester for a qualified fair housing enforcement organization, as defined in Section 125.103 of Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations, for the purpose of investigating and obtaining evidence reasonably believed to relate to the commission of discriminatory housing practices by another party to the communication.
(b)A person described in subdivision (a) may record a confidential conversation pursuant to this section, by means of any electronic recording device, including audio and video recording, whether the communication is carried on among the parties in the presence of one another or by means of a telephone or other device. For purposes of this subdivision, any electronic recording device means a recording device that remains on or with the investigator or tester and does not include a recording device that a person leaves behind and later retrieves for purposes of eavesdropping upon the confidential communications of others.
(c)(1)The provisions of Sections 631, 632, 632.5, 632.6, and 632.7 do not make any evidence obtained under this section inadmissible in any judicial, administrative, legislative, or other proceeding relating to an alleged discriminatory housing practice.
(2)The recording of the contents of any confidential communication made pursuant to this section shall not, without the permission of the persons recorded, or unless directed by the lawful order of a court, be disclosed except as evidence in a judicial or administrative enforcement proceeding. For its use in a proceeding, the recording shall be edited to redact confidential conversations of third parties who were not the target of the recording or whose communications or other identifying information are not relevant to the commission of the alleged discriminatory housing practice.
(d)As used in this section, the following terms are defined as follows:
(1)Discriminatory housing practice means any unlawful conduct as described in Section 12955 of the Government Code or a discriminatory housing practice as defined in subdivision (f) of Section 3602 of Title 42 of the United States Code.
(2)Tester means a person who, without any bona fide intent to rent or purchase housing, purchase a mortgage or vehicle loan, or patronize a place of public accommodation, poses as a prospective renter, borrower, or patron for the purpose of gathering information for the purpose of assessing compliance with civil rights laws.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2024 | From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56. |
| Jan 31, 2024 | Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution. |
| Sep 14, 2023 | Re-referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and H. & C.D. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96. |
| Jun 20, 2023 | Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. |
| Jun 19, 2023 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended. |
| Mar 23, 2023 | In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. |
| Mar 15, 2023 | Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. |
| Mar 14, 2023 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended. |
| Mar 2, 2023 | Referred to Com. on PUB. S. |
| Feb 16, 2023 | From printer. May be heard in committee March 18. |
| Feb 15, 2023 | Read first time. To print. |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
Bill Co-Author(s):
