(1)Existing law prescribes requirements for the disposal of surplus land by a local agency. Existing law defines local agency for these purposes as every city, county, city and county, and district, including school districts of any kind or class, empowered to acquire and hold real property. Existing law defines surplus land for these purposes as land owned by any local agency that is determined to be no longer necessary for the agencys use, except property being held by the agency for the purpose of exchange.

This bill would expand the definition of local agency to include sewer, water, utility, and local and regional park districts, joint powers authorities, successor agencies to former redevelopment agencies, housing authorities, and other political subdivisions of this state and any instrumentality thereof that is empowered to acquire and hold real property, thereby requiring these entities to comply with these requirements for the disposal of surplus land. The bill would revise the definition of surplus land to mean land owned by any local agency that is not necessary for the agencys governmental operations, except property being held by the agency expressly for the purpose of exchange for another property necessary for its governmental operations and would provide that land is presumed to be surplus land when a local agency initiates an action to dispose of it.

The bill would also define the term dispose of for these purposes as the sale, lease, transfer, or other conveyance of any interest in real property owned by a local agency. The bill would recast various provisions referring to the sale or lease of surplus land to instead refer to the disposal of surplus land. The bill would also delete certain obsolete references and make related conforming changes.

(2)Existing law requires a local agency disposing of surplus land to send, prior to disposing of that property, a written offer to sell or lease the property to specified entities. Existing law requires that a local agency, upon a written request, send a written offer to sell or lease surplus land to a housing sponsor, as defined, for the purpose of developing low- and moderate-income housing. Existing law also requires the local agency to send a written offer to sell or lease surplus land for the purpose of developing property located within an infill opportunity zone, designated as provided, to, among others, a community redevelopment agency.

This bill would instead require the local agency disposing of surplus land to send, prior to disposing of that property or participating in any formal or informal negotiations to dispose of that property, a written notice of availability. The bill would make various related conforming changes. With regards to a housing sponsor, the bill would require that the written notice of availability be sent if the housing sponsor has notified the applicable regional council of governments or, in the case of a local agency without a council of governments, the Department of Housing and Community Development of its interest in the land, rather than upon written request. With regards to surplus land to be used for the purpose of developing property located within an infill opportunity zone, as described above, the bill would instead require that the written notice of availability be sent to a successor agency to a former redevelopment agency.

(3)After the disposing agency has received a notice from an entity desiring to purchase or lease the land, existing law requires the disposing agency to enter into good faith negotiations to determine a mutually satisfactory sales price or lease terms.

This bill would limit negotiations to sales price and lease terms, including the amount and timing of any payments.

(4)If the local agency receives offers from more than one entity that agrees to meet specified requirements related to the provision of affordable housing on the surplus land, existing law requires the local agency to give priority to the entity that proposes to provide the greatest number of units that meet those requirements. Notwithstanding that requirement, existing law requires the local agency to give first priority to an entity in specified circumstances.

This bill would define priority for these purposes as meaning that the local agency negotiates in good faith exclusively with the entity pursuant to specified requirements. In the event that more than one entity proposes the same number of units that meet the above-described affordable housing requirements, this bill would require that priority be given to the entity that proposes the deepest average level of affordability for the affordable units.

(5)Under existing law, failure by a local agency to comply with these requirements for the disposal of surplus land does not invalidate the transfer or conveyance of real property to a purchaser or encumbrancer of value.

This bill, in the event of failure to comply, would provide that certain requirements, described below, relating to the use of units developed on the parcel for affordable housing purposes would apply.

(6)If a local agency does not agree to price and terms with an entity to which notice and an opportunity to purchase or lease are given and disposes of the surplus land to an entity that uses the property for the development of 10 or more residential units, existing law requires the purchasing entity or a successor in interest to provide not less than 15% of the total number of units developed on the parcels at an affordable housing cost or affordable rent to lower income households.

This bill would revise this requirement to apply if the local agency does not agree to price and terms with an entity to which notice of availability of land was given, or if no entity to which a notice of availability was given responds to that notice, and 10 or more residential units are developed on the property.

(7)Existing law makes various findings and declarations as to the need for affordable housing and the use of surplus government land for that purpose.

This bill would revise these findings.

(8)By adding to the duties of local officials with respect to the disposal of surplus land, and expanding the scope of local agencies subject to the bills requirements, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

(1)Existing law prescribes requirements for the disposal of surplus land by a local agency. Existing law defines local agency for these purposes as every city, county, city and county, and district, including school districts of any kind or class, empowered to acquire and hold real property. Existing law defines surplus land for these purposes as land owned by any local agency that is determined to be no longer necessary for the agencys use, except property being held by the agency for the purpose of exchange.

This bill would expand the definition of local agency to include sewer, water, utility, and local and regional park districts, joint powers authorities, successor agencies to former redevelopment agencies, housing authorities, and other political subdivisions of this state and any instrumentality thereof that is empowered to acquire and hold real property, thereby requiring these entities to comply with these requirements for the disposal of surplus land. The bill would revise the definition of surplus land to mean land owned by any local agency that is not necessary for the agencys governmental operations, except property being held by the agency expressly for the purpose of exchange for another property necessary for its governmental operations and would provide that land is presumed to be surplus land when a local agency initiates an action to dispose of it.

The bill would also define the term dispose of for these purposes as the sale, lease, transfer, or other conveyance of any interest in real property owned by a local agency. The bill would recast various provisions referring to the sale or lease of surplus land to instead refer to the disposal of surplus land. The bill would also delete certain obsolete references and make related conforming changes.

(2)Existing law requires a local agency disposing of surplus land to send, prior to disposing of that property, a written offer to sell or lease the property to specified entities. Existing law requires that a local agency, upon a written request, send a written offer to sell or lease surplus land to a housing sponsor, as defined, for the purpose of developing low- and moderate-income housing. Existing law also requires the local agency to send a written offer to sell or lease surplus land for the purpose of developing property located within an infill opportunity zone, designated as provided, to, among others, a community redevelopment agency.

This bill would instead require the local agency disposing of surplus land to send, prior to disposing of that property or participating in any formal or informal negotiations to dispose of that property, a written notice of availability. The bill would make various related conforming changes. With regards to a housing sponsor, the bill would require that the written notice of availability be sent if the housing sponsor has notified the applicable regional council of governments or, in the case of a local agency without a council of governments, the Department of Housing and Community Development of its interest in the land, rather than upon written request. With regards to surplus land to be used for the purpose of developing property located within an infill opportunity zone, as described above, the bill would instead require that the written notice of availability be sent to a successor agency to a former redevelopment agency.

(3)After the disposing agency has received a notice from an entity desiring to purchase or lease the land, existing law requires the disposing agency to enter into good faith negotiations to determine a mutually satisfactory sales price or lease terms.

This bill would limit negotiations to sales price and lease terms, including the amount and timing of any payments.

(4)If the local agency receives offers from more than one entity that agrees to meet specified requirements related to the provision of affordable housing on the surplus land, existing law requires the local agency to give priority to the entity that proposes to provide the greatest number of units that meet those requirements. Notwithstanding that requirement, existing law requires the local agency to give first priority to an entity in specified circumstances.

This bill would define priority for these purposes as meaning that the local agency negotiates in good faith exclusively with the entity pursuant to specified requirements. In the event that more than one entity proposes the same number of units that meet the above-described affordable housing requirements, this bill would require that priority be given to the entity that proposes the deepest average level of affordability for the affordable units.

(5)Under existing law, failure by a local agency to comply with these requirements for the disposal of surplus land does not invalidate the transfer or conveyance of real property to a purchaser or encumbrancer of value.

This bill, in the event of failure to comply, would provide that certain requirements, described below, relating to the use of units developed on the parcel for affordable housing purposes would apply.

(6)If a local agency does not agree to price and terms with an entity to which notice and an opportunity to purchase or lease are given and disposes of the surplus land to an entity that uses the property for the development of 10 or more residential units, existing law requires the purchasing entity or a successor in interest to provide not less than 15% of the total number of units developed on the parcels at an affordable housing cost or affordable rent to lower income households.

This bill would revise this requirement to apply if the local agency does not agree to price and terms with an entity to which notice of availability of land was given, or if no entity to which a notice of availability was given responds to that notice, and 10 or more residential units are developed on the property.

(7)Existing law makes various findings and declarations as to the need for affordable housing and the use of surplus government land for that purpose.

This bill would revise these findings.

(8)By adding to the duties of local officials with respect to the disposal of surplus land, and expanding the scope of local agencies subject to the bills requirements, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Date of Hearing: May 2, 2018

ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS

Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher, Chair

ABPCA Bill Id:AB 2065

Author:(Ting) – As Amended Ver:April 16, 2018

Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: Yes Reimbursable: Yes

SUMMARY:

This bill revises and expands provisions in the Surplus Land Act. Specifically, this bill:

1. Expands the types of local agencies required to comply with the Surplus Land Act to additionally include sewer, water, utility, local and regional park districts, joint powers authorities, successor agencies to former redevelopment agencies, housing authorities, and other political subdivisions of the state empowered to acquire and hold real property.
2. Revises the requirement that a local agency disposing of property must send a written offer to sell or lease the property, to instead require a local agency to send a written “notice of availability” of the property to specified entities prior to disposing of the property or participating in any formal or informal negotiations to dispose of the property. Requires written notices to be sent by email, if possible.
3. Requires the notice of availability additionally be sent to housing sponsors that have notified the applicable regional council of government (COG), or, for a local agency without a COG, the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), of their interest in surplus land.
4. Requires negotiations between the disposing agency and an interested entity to be limited to sales price and lease terms, including the amount and timing of any payments.
5. Provides that the existing 15% minimum affordability requirement applies whenever surplus public land is used for housing development, even if no entity responds to the notice of availability, and states that this requirement still applies, even if the local agency fails to comply with other provisions of the Surplus Land Act.

FISCAL EFFECT:

1. Potentially reimbursable state mandate costs likely in excess of $300,000 (GF) statewide to over 600 special districts that must newly implement the administrative and procedural requirements necessary to comply with the Surplus Land Act. For example, if 300 agencies spend $1,000 to implement the requirements in this bill, costs would be $300,000.

Actual costs will depend on the number reimbursement claims filed and a determination by the Commission on State Mandates.

1. Unknown potentially reimbursable state mandate costs to existing local agencies (cities, counties, special districts, and school districts) currently covered by the Surplus Land Act to comply with expanded definitions and additional requirements in the bill.

COMMENTS:

1. Purpose. This bill seeks to increase the supply of affordable housing by improving the distribution of surplus land. According to the author:

California is facing an affordable housing crisis and unused public land has the potential to promote affordable housing development throughout the state. AB 2065 will strengthen provisions in existing law that guarantee affordable housing developers get first priority to purchase surplus land from local governments and agencies.

1. Background. Local agencies are required to annually inventory land they own. If land is no longer needed, a local agency must follow certain procedures to dispose of "surplus" land. The intent of the disposal procedures is to promote the use of surplus land for affordable housing, parks and recreation purposes, open-space purposes, and transit-oriented development. The disposal procedures provide a right of first refusal to entities agreeing to use the land for, among other things, affordable housing.

Prior to disposing of surplus land, local agencies must make a written offer to sell or lease surplus land for the purpose of developing low- or moderate-income housing to "housing sponsors" upon written request, as well as any local public entity within the jurisdiction where the surplus land is located. A local agency must also provide a written offer to additional entities, depending on the type of proposed development, for park and recreational purposes, school facilities construction or use by a school district for open space purposes, enterprise purposes, and infill opportunity zones, or transit village plans.

If one of these entities is interested in buying or leasing the land, it must notify the local agency within 60 days of receipt of the offer. If a notified entity is interested but cannot agree with the agency on the price or terms, the local agency must enter into good-faith negotiations with the entity for at least 90 days. If 90 days pass without an agreement, then the local agency may sell or lease the land without further regard to the right of first refusal requirements.

AB 2135 (Ting), Chapter 677, Statutes of 2014, made a number of changes to the Surplus Land Act regarding the prioritization of affordable housing. The bill provided that if a local agency receives offers for the purchase or lease of land from more than one notified entity, the local agency must give first priority to the entity that agrees to provide at least 25% of the units to low-income households, with certain exceptions. If more than one notified entity agrees to provide the low-income housing, the local agency must give priority to the entity that proposes to provide the greatest number of affordable units at the deepest level of affordability.

AB 2135 also specified that if the local agency does not agree to price and terms with a notified entity and the surplus land is developed with 10 or more residential units, at least 15% of the units must be affordable to low-income households. The bill also increased the time a local agency has to conduct good faith negotiations from 60 days to 90 days.

1. Arguments in Support. Affordable housing supporters argue many local agencies have attempted to circumvent both the letter and the intent of the Surplus Land Act. They contend this bill will bring greater clarity and provide for more efficient distribution of surplus land to increase the supply of affordable housing.
2. Arguments in Opposition. Special districts note the bill would place onerous new requirements on public agencies disposing of surplus land and is not workable for all types of public agencies and situations.

Analysis Prepared by: Jennifer Swenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081

Date of Hearing: April 11, 2018

ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Cecilia Aguiar-Curry, Chair

ABPCA Bill Id:AB 2065 (

Author:Ting) – As Introduced Ver:February 7, 2018

SUBJECT: Local agencies: surplus land.

SUMMARY: Revises and expands provisions in the Surplus Land Act. Specifically, this bill:

1. Revises, for purposes of the Surplus Land Act, the following terms:
   1. Expands the definition of “local agency” to additionally include a sewer, water, utility, and local and regional park district, joint powers authorities, successor agency to a former redevelopment agency, housing authority, or other political subdivision of the state and any instrumentality thereof that is empowered to acquire and hold real property, thereby expanding the entities required to comply with the Surplus Land Act;
   2. Expands the definition of “surplus land” to mean land owned by any local agency that is not necessary for the agency’s governmental operations, except property being held by the agency expressly for the purpose of exchange for another property necessary for its governmental operations. States that land shall be presumed to be “surplus land” when a local agency initiates an action to dispose of it;
   3. Revises the definition of “exempt surplus land” to remove references to the enterprise zone program; and,
   4. Adds a definition of “dispose of” to mean sell, lease, transfer, or otherwise convey any interest in real property owned by a local agency.
2. Revises requirements related to a local agency disposing of property and sending a written offer to sell or lease to instead require any local agency to send a written notice of availability of the property to specified entities, prior to disposing of that property or participating in any formal or informal negotiations to dispose of that property.
3. Requires that the notice of availability additionally be sent to housing sponsors that have notified the applicable regional council of governments (COG), or, in the case of a local agency without a COG, the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD)
   of their interest in surplus land.
4. Requires written notices to be sent by electronic mail (e-mail), if possible.
5. Requires negotiations between the disposing agency and the entity to be limited to sales price and lease terms, including the amount and timing of any payments.
6. Requires priority to be given to the entity that proposes the deepest average level of affordability for the affordable units, in the event that more than one entity proposes the same number of units that meets the requirements of existing law.
7. Requires that a written notice of availability be sent to a successor agency to a former redevelopment agency, for surplus land to be used for the purpose of developing property located within an infill opportunity zone.
8. Defines, for purposes of the section of law in the Surplus Land Act that details the process that a local agency disposing of surplus land must give first priority to an entity when it receives multiple offers to purchase or lease land, the term “priority,” to mean “an entity negotiating in good faith exclusively with the entity” in accordance with another specified section of the Surplus Land Act.
9. Provides that if no entity to which a notice of availability was given responds to that notice, and 10 or more residential units are developed on that property, that not less than 15% of the total number of units developed on the parcels shall be sold or rented at affordable housing cost, as defined. Requires this provision to apply, even if the local agency fails to comply with other provisions of the Surplus Land Act that do not invalidate the transfer or conveyance of real property, as specified.
10. Specifies that if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill’s provisions contain costs mandated by the state, that reimbursement to local agencies and school districts shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
11. Makes other minor, technical, and conforming changes.

EXISTING LAW:

1. States, pursuant to the Surplus Land Act, the importance of making surplus government land, prior to disposition, available for purposes, including low- and moderate-income housing, park and recreation purposes or for open space purposes, and for the sale or lease of surplus land to facilitate the creation of affordable housing near transit.
2. Defines, for purposes of the Surplus Land Act, “local agency” to mean every city, county, city and county, and district, including school districts of any kind or class, empowered to acquire and hold real property.
3. Requires, pursuant to the Surplus Land Act:
   1. Any local agency disposing of surplus land to send, prior to disposing of that property, a written offer to sell or lease the property, as follows:
      1. A written offer to sell or lease for the purpose of developing low- and moderate-income housing shall be sent to any local public entity, as defined, within whose jurisdiction the surplus land is located. Housing sponsors shall be sent, upon written request, a written offer to sell or lease surplus land for the purpose of developing low- and moderate-income housing. Requires notices to be sent by first class mail, as specified;
      2. A written offer to sell or lease for park and recreational purposes or open-space purposes shall be sent:
         1. To any park or recreation department of any city within which the land may be situated;
         2. To any park or recreation department of the county within which the land is situated;
         3. To any regional park authority having jurisdiction within the area in which the land is situated; and,
         4. To the State Resources agency or any agency that may succeed to its powers.
      3. A written offer to sell or lease land suitable for school facilities construction or use by a school district for open-space purposes shall be sent to any school district in whose jurisdiction the land is located;
      4. A written offer to sell or lease for enterprise zone purposes;
      5. A written offer to sell or lease for the purpose of developing property located within an infill opportunity zone, as defined, or within an area covered by a transit village plan, as specified.
   2. Requires the entity or association desiring to purchase or lease the surplus land to notify in writing the disposing agency of its intent to purchase or lease the land within 60 days after receipt of the agency’s notification of intent to sell the land.
   3. Allows the land to be disposed of without further regard should the disposing agency and the entity not agree on price or terms after a good faith negotiation period of not less than 90 days.
   4. Requires, in the event that any local agency disposing of surplus land receives offers for the purchase or lease of that land from more than one of the entities to which notice was given, the local agency to give first priority to the entity that agrees to use the site for housing, as specified.
   5. States that the failure by a local agency to comply with the Surplus Land Act does not invalidate the transfer or conveyance of real property to a purchaser or encumbrancer for value.
   6. Provides that if the local agency does not agree to price and terms with an entity to which notice and an opportunity to purchase or lease are given and disposes of the surplus land to an entity that uses the property for the development of 10 or more residential units, the entity or a successor-in-interest shall provide not less than 15% of the total number of units developed on the parcels at affordable housing cost, as defined.

FISCAL EFFECT: This bill is keyed fiscal and contains a state-mandated local program.

COMMENTS:

1. Background on Surplus Land Act. Local agencies are required to inventory the land they own every year. If land is no longer needed, a local agency must follow certain procedures prior to disposal of this "surplus" land. The intent behind the disposal procedures is to promote the use of surplus land towards affordable housing, parks and recreation purposes, open-space purposes, and transit-oriented development. The disposal procedures provide a Right of First Refusal to entities agreeing to use the land for, amongst other things, affordable housing.

Prior to disposing of surplus land, local agencies must make a written offer to sell or lease surplus land for the purpose of developing low- or moderate-income housing to "housing sponsors" upon written request, as well as any local public entity within the jurisdiction where the surplus land is located. A local agency wishing to dispose of surplus land must also provide a written offer to additional entities, depending on the type of proposed development, for park and recreational purposes, school facilities construction or use by a school district for open space purposes, enterprise purposes, and infill opportunity zones, or transit village plans.

If one of these entities is interested in buying or leasing the land, it must notify the local agency within 60 days of receipt of the offer. If a notified entity is interested but cannot agree with the agency upon the price or terms, the local agency must enter into good faith negotiations with the entity for at least 90 days. If 90 days have passed without an agreement, then the local agency may sell or lease the land without further regard to the Right of First Refusal requirements under the disposal procedures.

AB 2135 (Ting), Chapter 677, Statutes of 2014, made a number of changes to the Surplus Land Act relating to the prioritization of affordable housing. The bill provided that, in the event that any local agency disposing of surplus land receives offers for the purchase or lease of that land from more than one notified entity, the local agency must give first priority to the entity that agrees to make available at least 25% of the units in the development at an affordable housing cost to low-income households, subject to exceptions relating to land used or designated for park and recreational use. If more than one notified entity agrees to make available at least 25% of the units in the development at an affordable housing cost to low-income individuals, then the local agency must give priority to the entity that proposes to provide the greatest number of affordable units at the deepest level of affordability.

AB 2135 additionally specified that if the local agency does not agree to price and terms with a notified entity and the surplus land is developed with 10 or more residential units, at least 15% of the units in the development must be at an affordable housing cost to low-income households. The bill also increased the time a local agency has to conduct good faith negotiations with certain entities from 60 days to 90 days.

1. Bill Summary. This bill makes a number of changes to the Surplus Land Act and is sponsored by the Non-Profit Housing Association of California. This bill:
   1. Expands the definition of “local agency” to additionally include a sewer, water, utility, and local and regional park district, joint powers authorities, successor agency to a former redevelopment agency, housing authority, or other political subdivision of the state and any instrumentality thereof that is empowered to acquire and hold real property, thereby expanding the entities required to comply with the Surplus Land Act;
   2. Revises requirements related to a local agency disposing of property and sending a written offer to sell or lease to instead require any local agency to send a written notice of availability of the property to specified entities, prior to disposing of that property or participating in any formal or informal negotiations to dispose of that property, and requires written notices to be sent by email, if possible;
   3. Requires that the notice of availability additionally be sent to housing sponsors that have notified the applicable regional COG, or, in the case of a local agency without a COG, HCD, of their interest in surplus land;
   4. Requires negotiations between the disposing agency and the entity to be limited to sales price and lease terms, including the amount and timing of any payments; and,
   5. Provides that the existing 15% minimum affordability requirement applies whenever surplus public land is used for housing development, even if no entity responds to the notice of availability, and states that this requirement still applies, even if the local agency fails to comply with other provisions of the Surplus Land Act.
2. Author’s Statement. According to the author, “California is facing an affordable housing crisis and unused public land has the potential to promote affordable housing development throughout the state. AB 2065 will strengthen provisions in existing law that guarantee affordable housing developers get first priority to purchase surplus land from local governments and agencies.”
3. Policy Considerations. A coalition of local agencies, including the Association of Healthcare Districts, the California Association of Sanitary Agencies, the California Municipal Utilities Association, the California Special Districts Association, and the Rural County Representatives of California have an “Oppose Unless Amended” position on the bill, and raise the following concerns:
   1. The new definition of “disposal” is problematic for public agencies that have valid reasons to lease or otherwise protect land they own (for instance, conservation easements may be sold or granted for sensitive species protection or as mitigation, or property held for future facility needs may be leased out until the property is sold). The coalition asks the author to consider amending the definition to apply only to the sale of surplus land;
   2. The coalition asks for amendments that would require public agencies to only offer land for sale that is considered suitable for school facilities or affordable housing; and,
   3. Lastly, the coalition notes that there could be good reasons for an agency to have information negotiations, and that if the agency complies with the Surplus Land Act by providing notice and negotiation in good faith, that should be all that is required.

The Committee may wish to ask the author about the issues raised above.

1. Committee Amendments. In order to correct an error in the bill, the Committee may wish to consider the following committee amendment:

On page 9, line 26:

(c) For purposes of this section, a local agency “priority” means that the local agency shall negotiate in good faith to an entity by negotiating in good faith exclusively with the entity in accordance with Section 54223.

1. Arguments in Support. Supporters argue that many local agencies have attempted to circumvent both the letter and the intent of the Surplus Land Act, and that this bill will bring greater clarity and provide for more efficient distribution of surplus land to increase the supply of affordable housing.
2. Arguments in Opposition. Opponents note that the bill would place onerous new requirements on public agencies disposing of surplus land, and that language in the bill needs to be revised to make it workable for all types of public agencies and situations.

REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:

Support

Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California [SPONSOR]

Bay Area Council

Burbank Housing Development Corporation

California Apartment Association

California Housing Consortium

California Housing Partnership Corporation

California YIMBY

Corporation for Supportive Housing

EAH Housing

East Bay Housing Organizations

Habitat for Humanity California

Housing Leadership Council

San Diego Housing Federation

San Francisco Housing Action Coalition

Silicon Valley at Home

Southern California Association of Non Profit Housing

YIMBY Action

Opposition

Association of California Healthcare Districts (unless amended)

California Association of Sanitary Agencies (unless amended)

California Municipal Utilities Association (unless amended)

California Special Districts Association (unless amended)

Rural County Representatives of California (unless amended)

Analysis Prepared by: Debbie Michel / L. GOV. / (916) 319-3958