SB 545: Pupil retention: COVID-19 impact.
- Session Year: 2021-2022
- House: Senate
- Latest Version Date: 2021-04-15
Existing law requires the governing board of each school district and each county board of education to approve a policy regarding the promotion and retention of pupils between specified grades, and requires that policy to provide for the identification of pupils who should be retained or who are at risk of being retained in their current grade level on the basis of specified factors. Existing law requires that the policy provide for parental notification when a pupil is identified as being at risk of retention, and that the policy provide the pupils parent or guardian the opportunity to consult with the teacher or teachers responsible for the decision to promote or retain the pupil. Existing law also requires, under specified circumstances, that the pupils parent or guardian be provided the opportunity to discuss a teachers recommendation with the teacher and the principal before any final determination of pupil retention or promotion is made. Existing law requires a pupil to be promoted or retained only as provided for in those policies.
Notwithstanding these requirements, for a pupil who was enrolled for the 202021 school year in kindergarten or any of grades 1 to 12, inclusive, in a school district, this bill would authorize the pupil to be retained in the grade level in which the pupil was enrolled in the 202021 school year if deemed necessary because of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the pupil, as determined solely by the pupils parent, guardian, custodian, or other educational rights holder. The bill would require a school district to approve, without condition, a request to retain the pupil in the grade level in which the pupil was enrolled in the 202021 school year. ByThis bill would require school districts, upon receiving a request from a pupils parent to retain the pupil for the 202122 school year, to offer to the pupil specified interventions and supports, offer to the pupil access to prior semester courses in which the pupil received a D or F letter grade or offer some other form of credit recovery, and provide to the parent information, made available by the State Department of Education, about research on the effects of pupil retention, and the types of interventions and supports that have been shown to be beneficial to pupils.
The bill would require the department to compile existing research on the effects of pupil retention on future academic outcomes, and on other outcomes as determined by the department, for pupils who were retained, and on the types of interventions and supports that have been shown to be beneficial to pupils. The bill would require the department to make this information available on its internet website commencing on or before August 1, 2021.
By imposing new duties on school districts, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Existing law requires the governing board of each school district and each county board of education to approve a policy regarding the promotion and retention of pupils between specified grades, and requires that policy to provide for the identification of pupils who should be retained or who are at risk of being retained in their current grade level on the basis of specified factors. Existing law requires that the policy provide for parental notification when a pupil is identified as being at risk of retention, and that the policy provide the pupils parent or guardian the opportunity to consult with the teacher or teachers responsible for the decision to promote or retain the pupil. Existing law also requires, under specified circumstances, that the pupils parent or guardian be provided the opportunity to discuss a teachers recommendation with the teacher and the principal before any final determination of pupil retention or promotion is made. Existing law requires a pupil to be promoted or retained only as provided for in those policies.
Notwithstanding these requirements, for a pupil who was enrolled for the 202021 school year in kindergarten or any of grades 1 to 12, inclusive, in a school district, this bill would authorize the pupil to be retained in the grade level in which the pupil was enrolled in the 202021 school year if deemed necessary because of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the pupil, as determined solely by the pupils parent, guardian, custodian, or other educational rights holder. The bill would require a school district to approve, without condition, a request to retain the pupil in the grade level in which the pupil was enrolled in the 202021 school year. By imposing new duties on school districts, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
(a)A school district, upon receiving a request from the parent of an eligible pupil to retain the pupil for the 202122 school year, shall do all of the following:
(1)Offer to the pupil specific interventions and supports pursuant to Part 24.6 (commencing with Section 43520) of Division 3.
(2)Offer to the pupil access to prior semester courses in which the pupil received a D or F letter grade, or offer some other form of credit recovery.
(3)Provide to the parent information, made available by the department, about research on the effects of pupil retention and the types of interventions and supports that have been shown to be beneficial to pupils.
(b)The department shall compile existing research on both of the following, and make this information available on its internet website commencing on or before August 1, 2021:
(1)The effects of pupil retention on future academic outcomes, and on other outcomes as determined by the department, for pupils who were retained.
(2)The types of interventions and supports that have been shown to be beneficial to pupils.
(b)(c)The following definitions apply to this section:
(1)Eligible pupil means a pupil who, for the 202021 school year, was enrolled in kindergarten or any of grades 1 to 12, inclusive, in a school district.
(2)Parent means the natural or adoptive parent or guardian, the person having legal custody, or other educational rights holder.
SEC. 2.If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
SEC. 3.This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
The COVID-19 global pandemic and associated school closures and shift to distance learning has resulted in significant learning loss among pupils in the state. Due to these factors, most pupils have missed a substantial proportion of the material covered in a typical school year. In order to timely prevent these hardships to pupils due to the COVID-19 global pandemic, it is necessary that this act take effect immediately.
(a)(1)Notwithstanding Sections 48070 and 48070.5, an eligible pupil may be retained in the grade level in which the pupil was enrolled in the 202021 school year if the pupils parent deems it necessary because of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the pupil, as determined solely by the pupils parent.
(2)Upon receiving a request for the pupils retention as described in paragraph (1), the school district shall approve the request without condition and retain the pupil in the grade level in which the pupil was enrolled in the 202021 school year.
(b)The following definitions apply to this section:
(1)Eligible pupil means a pupil who, for the 202021 school year, was enrolled in kindergarten or any of grades 1 to 12, inclusive, in a school district.
(2)Parent means the natural or adoptive parent or guardian, the person having legal custody, or other educational rights holder.
SEC. 2.If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
SEC. 3.This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
The COVID-19 global pandemic and associated school closures and shift to distance learning has resulted in significant learning loss among pupils in the state. Due to these factors, most pupils have missed a substantial proportion of the material covered in a typical school year. In order to timely prevent these hardships to pupils due to the COVID-19 global pandemic, it is necessary that this act take effect immediately.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2021 | Referred to Com. on ED. |
| Jun 2, 2021 | In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk. |
| Jun 1, 2021 | Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1346.) Ordered to the Assembly. |
| May 24, 2021 | Ordered to special consent calendar. |
| May 20, 2021 | From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1196.) (May 20). |
| May 14, 2021 | Set for hearing May 20. |
| May 4, 2021 | May 3 hearing: Placed on APPR suspense file. |
| Apr 21, 2021 | Set for hearing May 3. |
| Apr 15, 2021 | Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Apr 14, 2021 | From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 794.) (April 14). |
| Mar 25, 2021 | Set for hearing April 14. |
| Mar 3, 2021 | Referred to Com. on ED. |
| Feb 22, 2021 | Art. IV. Sec. 8(a) of the Constitution dispensed with. |
| Feb 19, 2021 | From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 21. |
| Feb 18, 2021 | Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2021 | Special Consent SB545 Wilk Urgency Clause | Senate Floor |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):