SB 964: Property tax: tax-defaulted property sales.
- Session Year: 2023-2024
- House: Senate
- Latest Version Date: 2024-04-25
Current Status:
Failed
(2024-05-16: May 16 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.)
Introduced
In Committee
First Chamber
In Committee
Second Chamber
Enacted
Existing law generally authorizes a county tax collector to sell tax-defaulted property 5 years or more, or 3 years or more, as applicable, after that property has become tax defaulted, to any person, regardless of any prior or existing lien on, claim to, or interest in, the property, as specified. Existing law also generally authorizes the sale to certain entities of a property that has been tax defaulted for 5 years or more, or 3 years or more, as applicable, in an applicable county, including by authorizing the state, county, any revenue district the taxes of which on the property are collected by county officers, or a redevelopment agency created pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law, to purchase the property or any part thereof, as prescribed. Existing law also authorizes a nonprofit organization to purchase, with the approval of the board of supervisors of the county in which it is located, a residential or vacant property that has been tax-defaulted tax defaulted for 5 years or more, or 3 years or more if the property is subject to a nuisance abatement lien, as prescribed. Existing law requires the sales price of a property sold pursuant to the provisions described or referenced above to include certain amounts, including all defaulted taxes and assessments and all associated penalties and costs.
This bill would prohibit authorize a property or property interest from being to be offered for sale under the provisions described above authorizing a sale to certain entities if that property or property interest that has not been offered for sale under the provisions described above authorizing a sale to any person unless if the State Board of Equalization conducts a property valuation that shows that the property or property interest is worth less than the amount of the defaulted debt, as specified.
Existing law generally authorizes a county tax collector to sell tax-defaulted property 5 years or more, or 3 years or more, as applicable, after that property has become tax defaulted, to any person, regardless of any prior or existing lien on, claim to, or interest in, the property, as specified. Existing law governs also generally authorizes the sale to certain entities of a property that has been tax defaulted for 5 years or more, or 3 years or more, as applicable, in an applicable county, including by authorizing the state, county, any revenue district the taxes of which on the property are collected by county officers, or a redevelopment agency created pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law, to purchase the property or any part thereof, as prescribed. Existing law also authorizes a nonprofit organization to purchase, with the approval of the board of supervisors of the county in which it is located, a residential or vacant property that has been tax-defaulted for 5 years or more, or 3 years or more if the property is subject to a nuisance abatement lien, as prescribed. Existing law requires the sales price of a property sold pursuant to the provisions described or referenced above to include certain amounts, including all defaulted taxes and assessments and all associated penalties and costs.
This bill would prohibit a property or property interest from being offered for sale under the provisions described above authorizing a sale to certain entities if that property or property interest has not been offered for sale under the provisions described below, described above authorizing a sale to any person unless certain conditions are satisfied. the Board of Equalization conducts a property valuation that shows that the property or property interest is worth less than the amount of the defaulted debt, as specified.
Existing law generally authorizes a county tax collector to sell to any person tax-defaulted property 5 years or more, or 3 years or more, as applicable, after that property has become tax defaulted. Existing law authorizes a party of interest in the property to file with the county a claim for the excess proceeds, in proportion to that persons interest held with others of equal priority in the property at the time of sale, at any time before the expiration of one year following the recordation of the tax collectors deed to the purchaser and provides for the distribution of those excess proceeds. Existing law requires, if excess proceeds from the sale of tax-defaulted property exceed $150, the county to provide notice of the right to claim the excess proceeds, as prescribed.This bill would require a county to review a claim filed pursuant to the provisions described above and determine whether the claim is complete and valid, and would prescribe a procedure for curing any deficiency in the claim. The bill would also require the notice described above to include certain information, including the consequences for failing to apply for excess proceeds within the claims period. By requiring a county to undertake new duties with respect to the claims process, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.Existing law authorizes certain excess proceeds from sales of property pursuant to the provisions described above to be transferred to the county general fund, as specified. Existing law generally governs and regulates the receipt, custody, investment, management, disposal, and escheat of various classes of unclaimed property to the possession of which the state is, or may become, entitled under the provisions of certain law. Existing law creates the Unclaimed Property Fund and requires all money, except permanently escheated money, paid to the state or any officer or employee thereof for deposit in the State Treasury under those provisions to be deposited in the fund on order of the Controller. Existing law provides that moneys in that fund are continuously appropriated to the Controller for specified purposes.This bill would instead require those excess proceeds from sales of property pursuant to the provisions described above to be transferred to the Controller for deposit in the Defaulted Tax Sale Subaccount, which this bill would establish in the fund to consist of moneys received by the Controller pursuant to the bills provisions. The bill would provide that those moneys are available upon appropriation for specified purposes. By requiring a county to undertake new duties with respect to these moneys, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.Existing law governs the sale to certain entities of a property that has been tax defaulted for 5 years or more, or 3 years or more, as applicable, in an applicable county, including by authorizing the state, county, any revenue district the taxes of which on the property are collected by county officers, or a redevelopment agency created pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law, to purchase the property or any part thereof, as prescribed. Existing law also authorizes a nonprofit organization to purchase, with the approval of the board of supervisors of the county in which it is located, a residential or vacant property that has been tax-defaulted for 5 years or more, or 3 years or more if the property is subject to a nuisance abatement lien, as prescribed. Existing law requires the sales price of a property sold pursuant to the provisions described or referenced above to include certain amounts, including all defaulted taxes and assessments and all associated penalties and costs.
This bill would prohibit a property or property interest from being offered for sale under the provisions described above if that property or property interest has not been offered for sale under the provisions described below. below, unless certain conditions are satisfied.
Existing law generally authorizes a county tax collector to sell to any person tax-defaulted property 5 years or more, or 3 years or more, as applicable, after that property has become tax defaulted. Existing law authorizes a party of interest in the property to file with the county a claim for the excess proceeds, in proportion to that persons interest held with others of equal priority in the property at the time of sale, at any time before the expiration of one year following the recordation of the tax collectors deed to the purchaser and provides for the distribution of those excess proceeds. Existing law requires, if excess proceeds from the sale of tax-defaulted property exceed $150, the county to provide notice of the right to claim the excess proceeds, as prescribed.
This bill would increase the claims period described above to 2 years if the county does not receive any claims before the expiration of one year following the recordation of the tax collectors deed to the purchaser and would make conforming changes. require a county to review a claim filed pursuant to the provisions described above and determine whether the claim is complete and valid, and would prescribe a procedure for curing any deficiency in the claim. The bill would also require the notice described above to include certain information, including the consequences for failing to apply for excess proceeds within the claims period. By requiring a county to administer the claims period for a longer time period and to include additional information in the required notice of the right to claim excess proceeds, undertake new duties with respect to the claims process, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing law authorizes certain excess proceeds from sales of property pursuant to the provisions described above to be transferred to the county general fund, as specified. Existing law generally governs and regulates the receipt, custody, investment, management, disposal, and escheat of various classes of unclaimed property to the possession of which the state is, or may become, entitled under the provisions of certain law. Existing law creates the Unclaimed Property Fund and requires all money, except permanently escheated money, paid to the state or any officer or employee thereof for deposit in the State Treasury under those provisions to be deposited in the fund on order of the Controller. Existing law provides that moneys in that fund are continuously appropriated to the Controller for specified purposes.
This bill would instead require those excess proceeds from sales of property pursuant to the provisions described above to be transferred to the Controller for deposit in the Defaulted Tax Sale Subaccount, which this bill would establish in the fund to consist of moneys received by the Controller pursuant to the bills provisions. The bill would provide that those moneys are available upon appropriation for specified purposes. By requiring a county to undertake new duties with respect to these moneys, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Existing law governs the sale to certain entities of a property that has been tax defaulted for 5 years or more, or 3 years or more, as applicable, in an applicable county, including by authorizing the state, county, any revenue district the taxes of which on the property are collected by county officers, or a redevelopment agency created pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law, to purchase the property or any part thereof, as prescribed. Existing law also authorizes a nonprofit organization to purchase, with the approval of the board of supervisors of the county in which it is located, a residential or vacant property that has been tax-defaulted for 5 years or more, or 3 years or more if the property is subject to a nuisance abatement lien, as prescribed. Existing law requires the sales price of a property sold pursuant to the provisions described or referenced above to include certain amounts, including all defaulted taxes and assessments and all associated penalties and costs.
This bill would prohibit a property or property interest from being offered for sale under the provisions described above if that property or property interest has not been offered for sale under the provisions described below.
Existing law generally authorizes a county tax collector to sell to any person tax-defaulted property 5 years or more, or 3 years or more, as applicable, after that property has become tax defaulted. Existing law authorizes a party of interest in the property to file with the county a claim for the excess proceeds, in proportion to that persons interest held with others of equal priority in the property at the time of sale, at any time before the expiration of one year following the recordation of the tax collectors deed to the purchaser and provides for the distribution of those excess proceeds. Existing law requires, if excess proceeds from the sale of tax-defaulted property exceed $150, the county to provide notice of the right to claim the excess proceeds, as prescribed.
This bill would increase the claims period described above to 2 years if the county does not receive any claims before the expiration of one year following the recordation of the tax collectors deed to the purchaser and would make conforming changes. The bill would also require the notice described above to include certain information, including the consequences for failing to apply for excess proceeds within the claims period. By requiring a county to administer the claims period for a longer time period and to include additional information in the required notice of the right to claim excess proceeds, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
(a)Property or a property interest shall not may be offered for sale under the provisions of this chapter if that property or property interest that has not been offered for sale under the provisions of Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 3691) unless if the State Board of Equalization conducts a property valuation that shows that the property or property interest is worth less than the amount of the defaulted debt.
(b)(1)A taxing authority intending to offer to sell property or a property interest under the provisions of this chapter in compliance with subdivision (a) shall notify the State Board of Equalization of that intent.
(2)Within 45 days of receiving a notification pursuant to paragraph (1), the State Board of Equalization shall provide the taxing authority with a valuation of the property or property interest.
(c)When considering whether to approve a sale of property or a property interest offered for sale under the provisions of this chapter without being offered for sale under the provisions of Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 3691), the Controller shall determine whether the State Board of Equalization property valuation shows that the property or property interest is worth less than the amount of the defaulted debt.
(a)Property or a property interest shall not be offered for sale under the provisions of this chapter if that property or property interest has not been offered for sale under the provisions of Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 3691) unless all of the following conditions are satisfied: the Board of Equalization conducts a property valuation that shows that the property or property interest is worth less than the amount of the defaulted debt.
(1)The countys property assessment shows that the property or property interest is worth less than the defaulted debt.(2)Offering the property or property interest for sale under the provisions of Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 3691) would cost the county more than offering the property or property interest for sale under the provisions of this chapter.(3)The countys board of supervisors approved offering the property or property interest for sale under the provisions of this chapter by majority vote after the issue is discussed during a regularly scheduled open meeting or hearing that gave the community an opportunity to discuss the proposed offering for sale.(b)When considering whether to approve offering the property or property interest for sale under the provisions of this chapter at an open meeting or hearing as described in paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), the countys board of supervisors shall consider all evidence and arguments presented during the meeting or hearing, including, but not limited to, evidence or arguments concerning both of the following:(1)The value of the property or property interest and the countys property assessment showing that value.(2)The cost of offering the property or property interest for sale under the provisions of Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 3691) as compared to the cost of offering the property or property interest for sale under the provisions of this chapter.(b)(1)A taxing authority intending to offer to sell property or a property interest under the provisions of this chapter in compliance with subdivision (a) shall notify the Board of Equalization of that intent.
(2)Within 45 days of receiving a notification pursuant to paragraph (1), the Board of Equalization shall provide the taxing authority with a valuation of the property or property interest.
(c)When considering whether to approve a sale of property or a property interest offered for sale under the provisions of this chapter without being offered for sale under the provisions of Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 3691), the Controller shall determine whether the Board of Equalization property valuation shows that the property or property interest is worth less than the amount of the defaulted debt.
SEC. 3.Section 4674 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:4674.Any excess in the proceeds deposited in the delinquent tax sale trust fund remaining after satisfaction of the amounts distributed under Sections 4672, 4672.1, 4672.2, 4673, and 4673.1 shall be retained in the fund on account of, and may be claimed by parties of interest in the property as provided in, Section 4675. At the expiration of the period specified in subdivision (e) of Section 4675, any excess proceeds not claimed under Section 4675 shall be transferred to the Controller for deposit in the Defaulted Tax Sale Subaccount in the Unclaimed Property Fund established pursuant to Section 1326 of the Code of Civil Procedure.SEC. 4.Section 4675 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:4675.(a)(1)Any party of interest in the property may file with the county a claim for the excess proceeds, in proportion to that persons interest held with others of equal priority in the property at the time of sale, at any time before the expiration of one year following the recordation of the tax collectors deed to the purchaser. The claim shall be postmarked on or before the one-year expiration date to be considered timely.(2)(A)The county shall review a claim filed pursuant to paragraph (1) and determine whether the claim is complete and valid.(B)If the county determines that a claim is incomplete or invalid, the county shall provide written notice to the claimant describing what is needed to cure the deficiency and informing the claimant that the claimant has 60 days to cure the deficiency.(C)A claim reviewed pursuant to this paragraph is timely if originally postmarked on or before the one-year expiration date even if the 60-day cure period required by this paragraph extends beyond that one-year expiration date.(b)After the property has been sold, a party of interest in the property at the time of the sale may assign their right to claim the excess proceeds only by a dated, written instrument that explicitly states that the right to claim the excess proceeds is being assigned, and only after each party to the proposed assignment has disclosed to each other party to the proposed assignment all facts of which that party is aware relating to the value of the right that is being assigned. Any attempted assignment that does not comply with these requirements shall have no effect. This subdivision applies only with respect to assignments on or after the effective date of this subdivision.(c)Any person or entity who in any way acts on behalf of, or in place of, any party of interest with respect to filing a claim for any excess proceeds shall submit proof with the claim that the amount and source of excess proceeds have been disclosed to the party of interest and that the party of interest has been advised of their right to file a claim for the excess proceeds on their own behalf directly with the county at no cost.(d)The claims shall contain any information and proof deemed necessary by the board of supervisors to establish the claimants rights to all or any portion of the excess proceeds.(e)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), no sooner than the claim expiration date and any review and cure periods determined pursuant to subdivision (a), and if the excess proceeds have been claimed by any party of interest as provided herein, the excess proceeds shall be distributed on order of the board of supervisors to the parties of interest who have claimed the excess proceeds in the order of priority set forth in subdivisions (a) and (b). For the purposes of this article, parties of interest and their order of priority are:(A)First, lienholders of record before the recordation of the tax deed to the purchaser in the order of their priority.(B)Second, any person with title of record to all or any portion of the property before the recordation of the tax deed to the purchaser.(2)(A)If the board of supervisors has been petitioned to rescind the tax sale pursuant to Section 3731, any excess proceeds shall not be distributed to the parties of interest as provided by paragraph (1) before the earlier of the claim expiration date and any review and cure periods determined pursuant to subdivision (a) or one year following the date the board of supervisors determines the tax sale should not be rescinded, and only if the person who petitioned the board of supervisors pursuant to Section 3731 has not commenced a proceeding in court pursuant to Section 3725.(B)If a proceeding has been commenced in a court pursuant to Section 3725, any excess proceeds shall not be distributed to the parties of interest as provided by paragraph (1) until a final court order is issued.(f)If a person with title of record is deceased at the time of the distribution of the excess proceeds, the heirs may submit an affidavit pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 13100) of Part 1 of Division 8 of the Probate Code, to support their claim for excess proceeds.(g)Any action or proceeding to review the decision of the board of supervisors, or the county officer to whom the board delegated authority pursuant to Section 4675.1, to accept or deny the claim shall be commenced within 90 days after the date of that decision of the board of supervisors or the county officer.SEC. 5.Section 4676 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:4676.(a)If excess proceeds from the sale of tax-defaulted property exceed one hundred fifty dollars ($150), the county shall provide notice of the right to claim the excess proceeds, as provided in this section.(b)No later than 90 days after the sale of the property, the county shall mail written notice of the right to claim excess proceeds to the last known mailing address of parties of interest, as defined in Section 4675. The county shall make a reasonable effort to obtain the name and last known mailing address of parties of interest.(c)If the last known address of a party of interest cannot be obtained, the county shall publish notice of the right to claim excess proceeds in a newspaper of general circulation in the county. Publication is not required if the cost to publish is equal to or greater than the amount of the excess proceeds. The notice shall be published once a week for three successive weeks and shall commence no later than 90 days after the sale of the property.(d)The cost of obtaining the name and last known mailing address of parties of interest and of mailing or publishing the notices required under this section shall be deducted from the excess proceeds and shall be distributed to the county general fund.(e)A notice pursuant to this section shall contain all of the following information:(1)The amount of the tax debt with respect to which the tax-defaulted property was in default.(2)The amount for which the property was sold.(3)The consequences for failing to apply for excess proceeds within the time period prescribed in Section 4675.SEC. 6.If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.(a)The Defaulted Tax Sale Subaccount is hereby established in the Unclaimed Property Fund.
(b)The Defaulted Tax Sale Subaccount shall consist of moneys received by the Controller and required to be deposited into the subaccount pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 3771) of Part 6 of Division 1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(c)Notwithstanding Section 1325, the moneys in the Defaulted Tax Sale Subaccount shall be available upon appropriation for the purposes of this title.
SECTION 1.SEC. 2.Section 3777 is added to the Revenue and Taxation Code, immediately following Section 3776, to read:3777.(a)Property or a property interest shall not be offered for sale under the provisions of this chapter if that property or property interest has not been offered for sale under the provisions of Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 3691). 3691) unless all of the following conditions are satisfied:
(1)The countys property assessment shows that the property or property interest is worth less than the defaulted debt.
(2)Offering the property or property interest for sale under the provisions of Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 3691) would cost the county more than offering the property or property interest for sale under the provisions of this chapter.
(3)The countys board of supervisors approved offering the property or property interest for sale under the provisions of this chapter by majority vote after the issue is discussed during a regularly scheduled open meeting or hearing that gave the community an opportunity to discuss the proposed offering for sale.
(b)When considering whether to approve offering the property or property interest for sale under the provisions of this chapter at an open meeting or hearing as described in paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), the countys board of supervisors shall consider all evidence and arguments presented during the meeting or hearing, including, but not limited to, evidence or arguments concerning both of the following:
(1)The value of the property or property interest and the countys property assessment showing that value.
(2)The cost of offering the property or property interest for sale under the provisions of Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 3691) as compared to the cost of offering the property or property interest for sale under the provisions of this chapter.
SEC. 3.Section 4674 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:4674.Any excess in the proceeds deposited in the delinquent tax sale trust fund remaining after satisfaction of the amounts distributed under Sections 4672, 4672.1, 4672.2, 4673, and 4673.1 shall be retained in the fund on account of, and may be claimed by parties of interest in the property as provided in, Section 4675. At the expiration of the period specified in subdivision (e) of Section 4675, any excess proceeds not claimed under Section 4675 may be transferred to the county general fund of the county by the county auditor, except that prior to the transfer, the county may deduct those costs of maintaining the redemption and tax-defaulted property files, and those costs of administering and processing the claims for excess proceeds, that have not been recovered under any other law. shall be transferred to the Controller for deposit in the Defaulted Tax Sale Subaccount in the Unclaimed Property Fund established pursuant to Section 1326 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
SEC. 2.SEC. 4.Section 4675 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:4675.(a)(1)Subject to paragraph (2), any Any party of interest in the property may file with the county a claim for the excess proceeds, in proportion to that persons interest held with others of equal priority in the property at the time of sale, at any time before the expiration of one year following the recordation of the tax collectors deed to the purchaser. The claim shall be postmarked on or before the one-year expiration date to be considered timely.
(2)The claim expiration date shall be two years following the recordation of the tax collectors deed to the purchaser if the county does not receive a claim by a person described in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (e) before the expiration of one year following the recordation of the tax collectors deed to the purchaser.(3)A claim pursuant to this subdivision shall be postmarked on or before the claim expiration date to be considered timely.(2)(A)The county shall review a claim filed pursuant to paragraph (1) and determine whether the claim is complete and valid.
(B)If the county determines that a claim is incomplete or invalid, the county shall provide written notice to the claimant describing what is needed to cure the deficiency and informing the claimant that the claimant has 60 days to cure the deficiency.
(C)A claim reviewed pursuant to this paragraph is timely if originally postmarked on or before the one-year expiration date even if the 60-day cure period required by this paragraph extends beyond that one-year expiration date.
(b)After the property has been sold, a party of interest in the property at the time of the sale may assign their right to claim the excess proceeds only by a dated, written instrument that explicitly states that the right to claim the excess proceeds is being assigned, and only after each party to the proposed assignment has disclosed to each other party to the proposed assignment all facts of which that party is aware relating to the value of the right that is being assigned. Any attempted assignment that does not comply with these requirements shall have no effect. This subdivision applies only with respect to assignments on or after the effective date of this subdivision.
(c)Any person or entity who in any way acts on behalf of, or in place of, any party of interest with respect to filing a claim for any excess proceeds shall submit proof with the claim that the amount and source of excess proceeds have been disclosed to the party of interest and that the party of interest has been advised of their right to file a claim for the excess proceeds on their own behalf directly with the county at no cost.
(d)The claims shall contain any information and proof deemed necessary by the board of supervisors to establish the claimants rights to all or any portion of the excess proceeds.
(e)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), no sooner than the claim expiration date and any review and cure periods determined pursuant to subdivision (a), and if the excess proceeds have been claimed by any party of interest as provided herein, the excess proceeds shall be distributed on order of the board of supervisors to the parties of interest who have claimed the excess proceeds in the order of priority set forth in subdivisions (a) and (b). For the purposes of this article, parties of interest and their order of priority are:
(A)First, lienholders of record before the recordation of the tax deed to the purchaser in the order of their priority.
(B)Second, any person with title of record to all or any portion of the property before the recordation of the tax deed to the purchaser.
(2)(A)If the board of supervisors has been petitioned to rescind the tax sale pursuant to Section 3731, any excess proceeds shall not be distributed to the parties of interest as provided by paragraph (1) before the earlier of the claim expiration date and any review and cure periods determined pursuant to subdivision (a) or two years one year following the date the board of supervisors determines the tax sale should not be rescinded, and only if the person who petitioned the board of supervisors pursuant to Section 3731 has not commenced a proceeding in court pursuant to Section 3725.
(B)If a proceeding has been commenced in a court pursuant to Section 3725, any excess proceeds shall not be distributed to the parties of interest as provided by paragraph (1) until a final court order is issued.
(f)If a person with title of record is deceased at the time of the distribution of the excess proceeds, the heirs may submit an affidavit pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 13100) of Part 1 of Division 8 of the Probate Code, to support their claim for excess proceeds.
(g)Any action or proceeding to review the decision of the board of supervisors, or the county officer to whom the board delegated authority pursuant to Section 4675.1, to accept or deny the claim shall be commenced within 90 days after the date of that decision of the board of supervisors or the county officer.
SEC. 3.SEC. 5.Section 4676 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:4676.(a)If excess proceeds from the sale of tax-defaulted property exceed one hundred fifty dollars ($150), the county shall provide notice of the right to claim the excess proceeds, as provided in this section.
(b)No later than 90 days after the sale of the property, the county shall mail written notice of the right to claim excess proceeds to the last known mailing address of parties of interest, as defined in Section 4675. The county shall make a reasonable effort to obtain the name and last known mailing address of parties of interest.
(c)If the last known address of a party of interest cannot be obtained, the county shall publish notice of the right to claim excess proceeds in a newspaper of general circulation in the county. Publication is not required if the cost to publish is equal to or greater than the amount of the excess proceeds. The notice shall be published once a week for three successive weeks and shall commence no later than 90 days after the sale of the property.
(d)The cost of obtaining the name and last known mailing address of parties of interest and of mailing or publishing the notices required under this section shall be deducted from the excess proceeds and shall be distributed to the county general fund.
(e)A notice pursuant to this section shall contain all of the following information:
(1)The amount of the tax debt with respect to which the tax-defaulted property was in default.
(2)The amount for which the property was sold.
(3)The consequences for failing to apply for excess proceeds within the time period prescribed in Section 4675.
SEC. 4.SEC. 6.If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
Property or a property interest shall not be offered for sale under the provisions of this chapter if that property or property interest has not been offered for sale under the provisions of Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 3691).
SEC. 2.Section 4675 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:4675.(a)Any (1)Subject to paragraph (2), any party of interest in the property may file with the county a claim for the excess proceeds, in proportion to that persons interest held with others of equal priority in the property at the time of sale, at any time prior to before the expiration of one year following the recordation of the tax collectors deed to the purchaser. The claim shall be postmarked on or before the one-year expiration date to be considered timely.
(2)The claim expiration date shall be two years following the recordation of the tax collectors deed to the purchaser if the county does not receive a claim by a person described in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (e) before the expiration of one year following the recordation of the tax collectors deed to the purchaser.
(3)A claim pursuant to this subdivision shall be postmarked on or before the claim expiration date to be considered timely.
(b)After the property has been sold, a party of interest in the property at the time of the sale may assign their right to claim the excess proceeds only by a dated, written instrument that explicitly states that the right to claim the excess proceeds is being assigned, and only after each party to the proposed assignment has disclosed to each other party to the proposed assignment all facts of which that party is aware relating to the value of the right that is being assigned. Any attempted assignment that does not comply with these requirements shall have no effect. This subdivision applies only with respect to assignments on or after the effective date of this subdivision.
(c)Any person or entity who in any way acts on behalf of, or in place of, any party of interest with respect to filing a claim for any excess proceeds shall submit proof with the claim that the amount and source of excess proceeds have been disclosed to the party of interest and that the party of interest has been advised of their right to file a claim for the excess proceeds on their own behalf directly with the county at no cost.
(d)The claims shall contain any information and proof deemed necessary by the board of supervisors to establish the claimants rights to all or any portion of the excess proceeds.
(e)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), no sooner than one year following the recordation of the tax collectors deed claim expiration date determined pursuant to the purchaser, subdivision (a), and if the excess proceeds have been claimed by any party of interest as provided herein, the excess proceeds shall be distributed on order of the board of supervisors to the parties of interest who have claimed the excess proceeds in the order of priority set forth in subdivisions (a) and (b). For the purposes of this article, parties of interest and their order of priority are:
(A)First, lienholders of record prior to before the recordation of the tax deed to the purchaser in the order of their priority.
(B)Second, any person with title of record to all or any portion of the property prior to before the recordation of the tax deed to the purchaser.
(2)(A)Notwithstanding paragraph (1), if If the board of supervisors has been petitioned to rescind the tax sale pursuant to Section 3731, any excess proceeds shall not be distributed to the parties of interest as provided by paragraph (1) sooner than one year before the earlier of the claim expiration date determined pursuant to subdivision (a) or two years following the date the board of supervisors determines the tax sale should not be rescinded, and only if the person who petitioned the board of supervisors pursuant to Section 3731 has not commenced a proceeding in court pursuant to Section 3725.
(B)If a proceeding has been commenced in a court pursuant to Section 3725, any excess proceeds shall not be distributed to the parties of interest as provided by paragraph (1) until a final court order is issued.
(f)In the event that If a person with title of record is deceased at the time of the distribution of the excess proceeds, the heirs may submit an affidavit pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 13100) of Part 1 of Division 8 of the Probate Code, to support their claim for excess proceeds.
(g)Any action or proceeding to review the decision of the board of supervisors, or the county officer to whom the board delegated authority pursuant to Section 4675.1, to accept or deny the claim shall be commenced within 90 days after the date of that decision of the board of supervisors or the county officer.
SEC. 3.Section 4676 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read:4676.(a)When If excess proceeds from the sale of tax-defaulted property exceed one hundred fifty dollars ($150), the county shall provide notice of the right to claim the excess proceeds, as provided in this section.
(b)No later than 90 days after the sale of the property, the county shall mail written notice of the right to claim excess proceeds to the last known mailing address of parties of interest, as defined in Section 4675. The county shall make a reasonable effort to obtain the name and last known mailing address of parties of interest.
(c)If the last known address of a party of interest cannot be obtained, the county shall publish notice of the right to claim excess proceeds in a newspaper of general circulation in the county. Publication is not required if the cost to publish is equal to or greater than the amount of the excess proceeds. The notice shall be published once a week for three successive weeks and shall commence no later than 90 days after the sale of the property.
(d)The cost of obtaining the name and last known mailing address of parties of interest and of mailing or publishing the notices required under this section shall be deducted from the excess proceeds and shall be distributed to the county general fund.
(e)A notice pursuant to this section shall contain all of the following information:
(1)The amount of the tax debt with respect to which the tax-defaulted property was in default.
(2)The amount for which the property was sold.
(3)The consequences for failing to apply for excess proceeds within the time period prescribed in Section 4675.
SEC. 4.If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| May 16, 2024 | May 16 hearing: Held in committee and under submission. |
| May 14, 2024 | Set for hearing May 16. |
| May 13, 2024 | May 13 hearing: Placed on APPR suspense file. |
| May 3, 2024 | Set for hearing May 13. |
| Apr 25, 2024 | Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Apr 24, 2024 | From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3758.) (April 24). |
| Apr 16, 2024 | From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX. |
| Apr 12, 2024 | Set for hearing April 24. |
| Apr 2, 2024 | April 10 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author. |
| Mar 19, 2024 | Set for hearing April 10. |
| Mar 5, 2024 | From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX. |
| Feb 21, 2024 | Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX. |
| Jan 24, 2024 | From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 23. |
| Jan 23, 2024 | Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2024 | Placed on suspense file | Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Apr 24, 2024 | Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Senate Standing Committee on Revenue and Taxation |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles | ** Support | |
| Apartment Owners Association of California, Inc. | ** Support | |
| Bizfed Central Valley | ** Support | |
| California Association Of County Treasurers & Tax Collectors | * Against | Apr 24, 2024 |
| California Housing Partnership | * Against | Apr 24, 2024 |
| California State Association Of Counties | * Against | Apr 24, 2024 |
| California Taxpayer Protection Committee | ** Support | |
| California Taxpayers Association | * Support | Apr 24, 2024 |
| Central Coast Taxpayers Association | ** Support | |
| Central Valley BizFed | ** Support | |
| Central Valley Taxpayers Association | ** Support | |
| Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors | * Against | Apr 24, 2024 |
| County Of Kern | ** Against | |
| County Of Madera | ** Against | |
| Glendora Chamber of Commerce | ** Support | |
| Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association | ** Support | |
| Lake County | * Against | Apr 24, 2024 |
| Lake County Board of Supervisors | * Against | Apr 24, 2024 |
| Los Angeles County Taxpayers Association | ** Support | |
| Monterey County Farm Bureau | ** Support | |
| Nisei Farmers League | ** Support | |
| Orange County Taxpayers Association | ** Support | |
| Pacific Legal Foundation | * Support | Apr 24, 2024 |
| Placer County Taxpayers Association | ** Support | |
| Rural County Represenatatives of California | * Against | Apr 24, 2024 |
| San Joaquin County Farm Bureau | ** Support | |
| Solano County Taxpayers Association | ** Support | |
| State Association Of County Auditors | ** Against | |
| Urban Counties of California | * Against | Apr 24, 2024 |
| Western Manufactured Housing Communities Association | ** Support |
SENATE COMMITTEE ON
Senator Anna Caballero, Chair
2023 - 2024 Regular Session
SB 964 (Seyarto) - Property tax: tax-defaulted property sales
Version: | Policy Vote: |
Urgency: | Mandate: |
Hearing Date: | Consultant: |
Bill Summary:
SB 964 would make specified changes to state law guiding tax-defaulted property sales.
Fiscal Impact:
The Board of Equalization (BOE) indicates that it would incur annual costs, at a minimum, of $1.8 million to $2 million annually, to implement the provisions of the bill (General Fund, See Staff Comments).
Background:
Current law generally requires county tax collectors to begin imposing penalties for nonpayment of property taxes of 10 percent of each amount due (plus administrative charges) once taxes become delinquent on April 10th. If a property owner does not pay the property taxes due in the current fiscal year before June 30th, the property becomes tax-defaulted, and can be subject to tax sale to satisfy outstanding taxes, penalties, and administrative charges.
To protect property owners, the Legislature has enacted specific procedural requirements to ensure tax collectors notify delinquent taxpayers when their property is subject to tax sale and offer them an opportunity to keep their property. After proper notification steps are taken, the tax collector is authorized to sell a residential property that has been in default for five years (three years for a commercial property). However, the tax collector must sell the property within four years of it being subject to sale. To conduct a tax sale, the tax collector must transmit to the county board of supervisors a notice of the properties intended to be sold. After approval of the board of supervisors, every June 8th, the tax collector publishes a notice of power and intent to sell (power to sell) property that will be tax defaulted with specified disclosures, which starts the tax sale process. This is referred to as a “Chapter 7 sale”.
At least 30 days before publishing the notice of intended sale, the tax collector must send a notice to all taxing agencies having the right to levy taxes or assessments on the property and each city having jurisdiction over a property scheduled for the tax sale. The State, a city, or any taxing agency or revenue district may object to the sale of a portion of the property, and try to purchase it themselves if it’s needed for public use. The tax collector must also forward a copy of the notice to any nonprofit organization that has requested a copy, which can also object to a tax sale and propose to purchase the property themselves, but only for the purposes of (1) constructing or rehabilitating currently substandard residential property to rent or sell to low-income persons, or otherwise use the property to serve low-income persons, or (2) dedicating vacant land for open space purposes, or for constructing residential dwellings for subsequent sale or rent to low-income persons, or for other uses to serve low-income persons.
Nonprofit agencies can also request that the tax collector send to tax sale a property eligible, but not scheduled, for tax sale. When a public agency or nonprofit proposes to purchase the property, the tax collector then proposes it to a Chapter 8 sale (see below).
The tax collector must then send notice of a proposed tax sale to the State Controller’s Office. During this period, the tax collector must also make a reasonable effort to ascertain the names and last known addresses of parties of interest to the sale, including the owner and other lienholders. Not less than 45 days nor more than 120 days before the proposed sale, the tax collector must send notice of the sale to these parties of interest. The tax collector or their agent must make a reasonable effort to contact in person any owner-occupant of a property before the tax sale, based on either a valid homeowner’s exemption, or the fact that the mailing address for the last tax bill is the same address as the property. If the tax collector or their agent cannot make personal contact, they must attempt to serve written notice, no less than five days prior to the date of the sale. The tax collector then publishes the notice of tax sale, generally in a newspaper of general circulation published in the county seat and in the public notice district where the property is situated, at least 21 days before the sale.
As noted above, government entities and nonprofit organizations can enter into agreements to purchase tax defaulted residential or vacant property that has been tax defaulted, known as a “Chapter 8 sale.” A Chapter 8 sale is not held by auction, instead requiring only payment of delinquent taxes, redemption penalties, and other costs; in some cases, the tax collector can further reduce the price. The state, local agency, or nonprofit submits an application to the county with a purchase price, which must be approved by the board of supervisors.
The board of supervisors may establish conditions of sale to the nonprofit, including reporting, to assure the completion of rehabilitation within a reasonable time and maximum benefit to low-income persons. After approval, the tax collector must send a copy of the executed agreement to the State Controller for approval. If approved, the tax collector publishes notice of the agreement. The tax collector must then complete almost all of the same steps as a regular (Chapter 7) sale, such as sending the agreement to the current property owner and any parties of interest not less than 45 nor more than 60 days prior to the effective date of the agreement, and publishing the notice of agreement. The sale cannot become effective less than 21 days from the date the tax collector publishes notice of the agreement. Unlike Chapter 7 sales, no process for rescission exists for Chapter 8 sales.
Generally, counties paused tax sales during the COVID-19 pandemic. As they have resumed, Chapter 8 sales are reportedly rare, with only 16 in 6 counties in 2022, and 30 in 12 counties in 2023, according to the State Controller. However, many counties have ceased Chapter 8 sales because of a recent U.S. Supreme Court case.
Proposed Law:
This bill would prohibit a Chapter 8 sale of tax-defaulted property unless the property is first (1) offered under Chapter 7, or (2) the State Board of Equalization (BOE) conducts a property valuation that shows the value of the property interest is worth less than the amount of the defaulted debt. Under the bill, a taxing authority intending to sell a property or property interest would need to notify BOE, which would then be required to provide the taxing authority with a valuation of that property or property interest within 45 days of the notification. Additionally, the bill would direct the State Controller to determine if the BOE’s valuation shows that the property or property interest is worth less than the amount of the defaulted debt, as part of the Chapter 8 approval process.
Staff Comments:
BOE would incur potentially significant staffing costs depending on the number of properties it would need to evaluate annually. Given the bill’s 45-day timeline, the Board would potentially need to augment its staff of property appraisers by a minimum of 10 positions, with an ongoing cost of at least $1.5 million. Since the appraisal of parcels would require in-person site visits, additional costs for travel and accommodations throughout the State would be needed as well. Finally, BOE’s Legal and Communications Departments would incur increased workload, for, respectively, (1) staff time for appeals by potential litigants alleging problems with the BOE’s valuations, and (2) increased public inquiries regarding property valuation concerns.
-- END --
SENATE COMMITTEE ON REVENUE AND TAXATION
Senator Steven Glazer, Chair
2023 - 2024 Regular
Bill No: | SB 964 | Hearing Date: | 4/24/24 |
Author: | Seyarto | Tax Levy: | No |
Version: | 4/16/24 Amended | Fiscal: | Yes |
Consultant: | Grinnell | ||
Property tax: tax-defaulted property sales
Makes three changes to state law guiding property tax sales.
Background
Property taxes are due in two installments: November 1, and February 1, with delinquency for the second installment occurring on April 10. Generally, state law requires county tax collectors to begin imposing penalties for nonpayment of property taxes of 10% of each amount due, plus administrative charges, once taxes become delinquent. If a property owner does not pay the property taxes due in the current fiscal year before June 30th, their property becomes tax-defaulted, and can be subject to tax sale to satisfy outstanding taxes, penalties, and administrative charges.
Tax sales. Tax sales deprive persons of property ownership, so the Legislature has added specific procedural requirements to ensure tax collectors notify delinquent taxpayers when their property is subject to tax sale, and offer them an opportunity to retain their property. Among these, tax collectors must first send a notice of impending default, then a notice of default, to taxpayers whose property may be subject to tax sale by registered mail to the taxpayer’s last known address. During the period between the property being declared in default and the sale of the property, the property owner has a right to redeem the status of the property by paying all taxes, assessments, penalties, and fees. Tax collectors can offer delinquent taxpayers installment agreements to cure a default before a tax sale.
The tax collector can then sell a residential property that has been in default for five years, or three years for a commercial property, unless the board of supervisors sets a five-year period for commercial property. However, the tax collector must sell property within four years of it being subject to sale. To conduct a tax sale, the tax collector must transmit to the board of supervisors a notice of the properties they intend to sell. After approval of the board of supervisors, every June 8th, the tax collector publishes a notice of power and intent to sell all property that will be tax defaulted with specified contents, which commences the tax sale process.
At least 30 days before publishing the notice of intended sale, the tax collector must send a notice to all taxing agencies having the right to levy taxes or assessments on the property and each city having jurisdiction over a property scheduled for the tax sale. The State, a city, or any taxing agency or revenue district may object to the sale of a portion of the property, and try to purchase it themselves if it’s needed for public use. The tax collector must also forward a copy of the notice to any nonprofit organization that has requested a copy, which can also object to a tax sale and propose to purchase the property themselves, but only for the purposes of:
- Constructing or rehabilitating currently substandard residential property to rent or sell to low-income persons, or otherwise use the property to serve low-income persons, or
- Dedicating vacant land for open space purposes, or for constructing residential dwellings for subsequent sale or rent to low-income persons, or for other uses to serve low-income persons.
Nonprofit agencies can also request that the tax collector send to tax sale a property eligible, but not scheduled, for tax sale. When a public agency or nonprofit proposes to purchase the property, the tax collector then proposes it to a Chapter 8 sale (see below).
The tax collector must then send notice of a proposed tax sale to the State Controller’s Office. During this period, the tax collector must also make a reasonable effort to ascertain the names and last known addresses of parties of interest to the sale, including the owner and other lienholders. Not less than 45 days nor more than 120 days before the proposed sale, the tax collector must send notice of the sale to these parties of interest. The tax collector or their agent must make a reasonable effort to contact in person any owner-occupant of a property before the tax sale, based on either a valid homeowner’s exemption, or the fact that the mailing address for the last tax bill is the same address as the property. If the tax collector or their agent cannot make personal contact, they must attempt to serve written notice, no less than five days prior to the date of the sale. The tax collector then publishes the notice of tax sale, generally in a newspaper of general circulation published in the county seat and in the public notice district where the property is situated, at least 21 days before the sale.
Upon completion of the sale, this right of redemption terminates, and the title to the property is deeded to the purchaser. However, a property owner has one year from the date of sale to petition the board of supervisors for a rescission of the tax sale.
Chapter 8 Sales. As noted above, government entities and nonprofit organizations can enter into agreements to purchase tax defaulted residential or vacant property that has been tax defaulted, known as a “Chapter 8 sale.” A Chapter 8 sale is not held by auction, instead requiring only payment of delinquent taxes, redemption penalties, and other costs; in some cases, the tax collector can further reduce the price. The state, local agency, or nonprofit submits an application to the county with a purchase price, which must be approved by the board of supervisors.
The board of supervisors may establish conditions of sale to the nonprofit, including reporting, to assure the completion of rehabilitation within a reasonable time and maximum benefit to low-income persons. After approval, the tax collector must send a copy of the executed agreement to the State Controller for approval. If approved, the tax collector publishes notice of the agreement. The tax collector must then complete almost all of the same steps as a regular – known as a Chapter 7 – sale, such as sending the agreement to the current property owner and any parties of interest not less than 45 nor more than 60 days prior to the effective date of the agreement, and publishing the notice of agreement. The sale cannot become effective less than 21 days from the date the tax collector publishes notice of the agreement. Unlike Chapter 7 sales, no process for rescission exists for Chapter 8 sales.
Generally, counties paused tax sales during the COVID-19 pandemic. As they have resumed, Chapter 8 sales are rare, with only 16 in 6 counties in 2022, and 30 in 12 counties in 2023, according to the State Controller. However, many counties have ceased Chapter 8 sales because of a recent U.S. Supreme Court case (see below)
Tyler v. Hennepin County. Last year, the United States Supreme Court decided Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota, 598 U.S. 631, 143 S. CT. 1369. In the case, the Court ruled the County had violated the United States Constitution’s Fifth Amendment takings clause. Unlike in California where taxpayers can claim excess proceeds from a tax sale, under Minnesota law, the state can either keep a tax-defaulted property for public use or sell it, retaining all proceeds, including those in excess of the tax due.
Arguing that Chapter 8 sales do not comply with the U.S. Supreme Court’s holding in Tyler v. Hennepin County, the author wants to limit Chapter 8 sales.
Proposed Law
Senate Bill 946 prohibits Chapter 8 tax sales unless:
- The property is first offered under Chapter 7, or
- The State Board of Equalization (BOE) conducts a property valuation that shows the value of the property interest is worth less than the amount of the defaulted debt.
A taxing authority intending to sell a property or property interest must notify BOE of that intent. BOE must provide the authority with a valuation of that property or property interest within 45 days of the notification. The bill additionally directs the Controller to consider whether BOE’s valuation shows the value of the property or property interest exceeds the amount of defaulted debt as part of the Chapter 8 approval process.
State Revenue Impact
No estimate.
Comments
1. Purpose of the bill. According to the author, “SB-964 seeks to bring California into compliance with the recent Tyler v. Hennepin County ruling by the United States Supreme Court. By providing a third party valuation of a property, pending a Chapter 8 sale, local governments can ensure that they are providing the property at fair market value and are in compliance with the Supreme Court ruling. This will protect local governments from being targeted for Constitutional violations while keeping an essential tool for selling tax defaulted properties within California. Although minor, this is a needed adjustment to protect both the Constitutional rights of property owners and the actions of local governments surrounding these unique properties.”
2. What’s the problem? SB 964 gives counties two choices to conduct a Chapter 8 sale. First, it can attempt a Chapter 7 sale, where the tax collector can only accept a minimum bid that is equal to or exceeds the amount of defaulted taxes, interest, and costs. If a minimum bid is not received, the county can then proceed to a Chapter 8 sale. Second, the county can notify BOE, which must then complete a valuation of the property or the property interest. If the BOE valuation shows a value that is less than the amount of defaulted debt, the County can then proceed to a Chapter 8 sale. However, it’s unclear counties have used Chapter 8 to seize an owner-occupied residence as was the case in Tyler v. Hennepin County, where the Court found Minnesota’s statute that deeds any tax-defaulted property to the state was in violation of the Takings Clause. Additionally, counties are aware of the case and any litigation risk they would assume authorizing a Chapter 8 sale where excess proceeds are possible. Lastly, limiting Chapter 8 sales may make it harder for local agencies to acquire property to provide public services, or nonprofit organizations to provide affordable housing. The Committee may wish to consider whether SB 964 is necessary.
3. One way. SB 964 allows counties to proceed with tax sales so long as they have a valuation from BOE that shows the value of the property interest is worth less than the amount of the defaulted debt. While BOE values unitary property of statewide assessees like utilities and railroads, and oversees county assessors, its property tax staff generally doesn’t appraise individual properties or interests. Additionally, the bill does not augment BOE’s budget to compensate for the costs of the valuation, which must be completed in short order – 45 days. Lastly, nonprofit organizations or government entities may want to contract with their own appraisers to conduct the valuation, but only a BOE valuation will suffice under the bill for a nonprofit organization or government entity that wants to purchase a property or property interest.
4. Render unto pharaoh. According to various sources, property taxes began in ancient Egypt, spread around the world to Europe and Asia, and today remain one of the primary ways governments raise money to finance public services. For governments, property taxes have several advantages over other taxes, most notably that assessors can physically locate and value the property subject to tax, and tax collectors can sell it when tax-defaulted. While imposing a more severe penalty than nonpayment of other taxes, tax sales not only serve as a significant deterrent for non-payment, they allow land that is abandoned or defunct as evidenced by non-payment of taxes to be transferred to others who can put it to productive use, improving a community’s general wealth. Additionally, tax sales convert a property where owners are not paying taxes into one where not only are delinquent taxes repaid, but so are current taxes. Because deprivation of property is among the most severe penalties governments can impose for violations of law, state law sets forth an exhaustive process of notices, notifications, publications, and approvals that ensure taxpayers and parties of interest are aware of property tax delinquency, impending sale, and ability to claim any excess proceeds. There are few categorical exemptions from property tax, so any property owner cannot reasonably claim ignorance of their property tax obligations. Any deprivation of property resulting from a tax sale can only legally occur after tax collectors have satisfied several steps to collect lawfully due and payable taxes from taxpayers who have failed to pay taxes for several years.
5. Technicals. Committee staff recommends revising subdivision (a) of the measure’s new code section to add clarity.
Support and Opposition
(4/19/24)
Support: Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles
Apartment Owners Association of California, Inc.
Bizfed Central Valley
California Taxpayer Protection Committee
CalTax
Central Coast Taxpayers Association
Central Valley BizFed
Central Valley Taxpayers Association
Glendora Chamber of Commerce
Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (HJTA)
Los Angeles County Taxpayers Association
Monterey County Farm Bureau
Nisei Farmers League
Orange County Taxpayers’ Association
Pacific Legal Foundation
Placer County Taxpayers Association
San Joaquin County Farm Bureau
Solano County Taxpayers Association
Western Manufactured Housing Communities Association
1 Individual
Opposition: California Association of County Treasurers and Tax Collectors
California Housing Partnership Corporation
California State Association of Counties (CSAC)
Contra Costa County
County of Kern
County of Lake
County of Madera
Rural County Representatives of California (RCRC)
State Association of County Auditors
Urban Counties of California (UCC)
-- END --
SENATE COMMITTEE ON REVENUE AND TAXATION
Senator Steven Glazer, Chair
2023 - 2024 Regular
Bill No: | SB 964 | Hearing Date: | 4/24/24 |
Author: | Seyarto | Tax Levy: | No |
Version: | 4/16/24 Amended | Fiscal: | Yes |
Consultant: | Grinnell | ||
Property tax: tax-defaulted property sales
Makes three changes to state law guiding property tax sales.
Background
Property taxes are due in two installments: November 1, and February 1, with delinquency for the second installment occurring on April 10. Generally, state law requires county tax collectors to begin imposing penalties for nonpayment of property taxes of 10% of each amount due, plus administrative charges, once taxes become delinquent. If a property owner does not pay the property taxes due in the current fiscal year before June 30th, their property becomes tax-defaulted, and can be subject to tax sale to satisfy outstanding taxes, penalties, and administrative charges.
Tax sales. Tax sales deprive persons of property ownership, so the Legislature has added specific procedural requirements to ensure tax collectors notify delinquent taxpayers when their property is subject to tax sale, and offer them an opportunity to retain their property. Among these, tax collectors must first send a notice of impending default, then a notice of default, to taxpayers whose property may be subject to tax sale by registered mail to the taxpayer’s last known address. During the period between the property being declared in default and the sale of the property, the property owner has a right to redeem the status of the property by paying all taxes, assessments, penalties, and fees. Tax collectors can offer delinquent taxpayers installment agreements to cure a default before a tax sale.
The tax collector can then sell a residential property that has been in default for five years, or three years for a commercial property, unless the board of supervisors sets a five-year period for commercial property. However, the tax collector must sell property within four years of it being subject to sale. To conduct a tax sale, the tax collector must transmit to the board of supervisors a notice of the properties they intend to sell. After approval of the board of supervisors, every June 8th, the tax collector publishes a notice of power and intent to sell all property that will be tax defaulted with specified contents, which commences the tax sale process.
At least 30 days before publishing the notice of intended sale, the tax collector must send a notice to all taxing agencies having the right to levy taxes or assessments on the property and each city having jurisdiction over a property scheduled for the tax sale. The State, a city, or any taxing agency or revenue district may object to the sale of a portion of the property, and try to purchase it themselves if it’s needed for public use. The tax collector must also forward a copy of the notice to any nonprofit organization that has requested a copy, which can also object to a tax sale and propose to purchase the property themselves, but only for the purposes of:
- Constructing or rehabilitating currently substandard residential property to rent or sell to low-income persons, or otherwise use the property to serve low-income persons, or
- Dedicating vacant land for open space purposes, or for constructing residential dwellings for subsequent sale or rent to low-income persons, or for other uses to serve low-income persons.
Nonprofit agencies can also request that the tax collector send to tax sale a property eligible, but not scheduled, for tax sale. When a public agency or nonprofit proposes to purchase the property, the tax collector then proposes it to a Chapter 8 sale (see below).
The tax collector must then send notice of a proposed tax sale to the State Controller’s Office. During this period, the tax collector must also make a reasonable effort to ascertain the names and last known addresses of parties of interest to the sale, including the owner and other lienholders. Not less than 45 days nor more than 120 days before the proposed sale, the tax collector must send notice of the sale to these parties of interest. The tax collector or their agent must make a reasonable effort to contact in person any owner-occupant of a property before the tax sale, based on either a valid homeowner’s exemption, or the fact that the mailing address for the last tax bill is the same address as the property. If the tax collector or their agent cannot make personal contact, they must attempt to serve written notice, no less than five days prior to the date of the sale. The tax collector then publishes the notice of tax sale, generally in a newspaper of general circulation published in the county seat and in the public notice district where the property is situated, at least 21 days before the sale.
Upon completion of the sale, this right of redemption terminates, and the title to the property is deeded to the purchaser. However, a property owner has one year from the date of sale to petition the board of supervisors for a rescission of the tax sale.
Chapter 8 Sales. As noted above, government entities and nonprofit organizations can enter into agreements to purchase tax defaulted residential or vacant property that has been tax defaulted, known as a “Chapter 8 sale.” A Chapter 8 sale is not held by auction, instead requiring only payment of delinquent taxes, redemption penalties, and other costs; in some cases, the tax collector can further reduce the price. The state, local agency, or nonprofit submits an application to the county with a purchase price, which must be approved by the board of supervisors.
The board of supervisors may establish conditions of sale to the nonprofit, including reporting, to assure the completion of rehabilitation within a reasonable time and maximum benefit to low-income persons. After approval, the tax collector must send a copy of the executed agreement to the State Controller for approval. If approved, the tax collector publishes notice of the agreement. The tax collector must then complete almost all of the same steps as a regular – known as a Chapter 7 – sale, such as sending the agreement to the current property owner and any parties of interest not less than 45 nor more than 60 days prior to the effective date of the agreement, and publishing the notice of agreement. The sale cannot become effective less than 21 days from the date the tax collector publishes notice of the agreement. Unlike Chapter 7 sales, no process for rescission exists for Chapter 8 sales.
Generally, counties paused tax sales during the COVID-19 pandemic. As they have resumed, Chapter 8 sales are rare, with only 16 in 6 counties in 2022, and 30 in 12 counties in 2023, according to the State Controller. However, many counties have ceased Chapter 8 sales because of a recent U.S. Supreme Court case (see below)
Tyler v. Hennepin County. Last year, the United States Supreme Court decided Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota, 598 U.S. 631, 143 S. CT. 1369. In the case, the Court ruled the County had violated the United States Constitution’s Fifth Amendment takings clause. Unlike in California where taxpayers can claim excess proceeds from a tax sale, under Minnesota law, the state can either keep a tax-defaulted property for public use or sell it, retaining all proceeds, including those in excess of the tax due.
Arguing that Chapter 8 sales do not comply with the U.S. Supreme Court’s holding in Tyler v. Hennepin County, the author wants to limit Chapter 8 sales.
Proposed Law
Senate Bill 946 prohibits Chapter 8 tax sales unless:
- The property is first offered under Chapter 7, or
- The State Board of Equalization (BOE) conducts a property valuation that shows the value of the property interest is worth less than the amount of the defaulted debt.
A taxing authority intending to sell a property or property interest must notify BOE of that intent. BOE must provide the authority with a valuation of that property or property interest within 45 days of the notification. The bill additionally directs the Controller to consider whether BOE’s valuation shows the value of the property or property interest exceeds the amount of defaulted debt as part of the Chapter 8 approval process.
State Revenue Impact
No estimate.
Comments
1. Purpose of the bill. According to the author, “SB-964 seeks to bring California into compliance with the recent Tyler v. Hennepin County ruling by the United States Supreme Court. By providing a third party valuation of a property, pending a Chapter 8 sale, local governments can ensure that they are providing the property at fair market value and are in compliance with the Supreme Court ruling. This will protect local governments from being targeted for Constitutional violations while keeping an essential tool for selling tax defaulted properties within California. Although minor, this is a needed adjustment to protect both the Constitutional rights of property owners and the actions of local governments surrounding these unique properties.”
2. What’s the problem? SB 964 gives counties two choices to conduct a Chapter 8 sale. First, it can attempt a Chapter 7 sale, where the tax collector can only accept a minimum bid that is equal to or exceeds the amount of defaulted taxes, interest, and costs. If a minimum bid is not received, the county can then proceed to a Chapter 8 sale. Second, the county can notify BOE, which must then complete a valuation of the property or the property interest. If the BOE valuation shows a value that is less than the amount of defaulted debt, the County can then proceed to a Chapter 8 sale. However, it’s unclear counties have used Chapter 8 to seize an owner-occupied residence as was the case in Tyler v. Hennepin County, where the Court found Minnesota’s statute that deeds any tax-defaulted property to the state was in violation of the Takings Clause. Additionally, counties are aware of the case and any litigation risk they would assume authorizing a Chapter 8 sale where excess proceeds are possible. Lastly, limiting Chapter 8 sales may make it harder for local agencies to acquire property to provide public services, or nonprofit organizations to provide affordable housing. The Committee may wish to consider whether SB 964 is necessary.
3. One way. SB 964 allows counties to proceed with tax sales so long as they have a valuation from BOE that shows the value of the property interest is worth less than the amount of the defaulted debt. While BOE values unitary property of statewide assessees like utilities and railroads, and oversees county assessors, its property tax staff generally doesn’t appraise individual properties or interests. Additionally, the bill does not augment BOE’s budget to compensate for the costs of the valuation, which must be completed in short order – 45 days. Lastly, nonprofit organizations or government entities may want to contract with their own appraisers to conduct the valuation, but only a BOE valuation will suffice under the bill for a nonprofit organization or government entity that wants to purchase a property or property interest.
4. Render unto pharaoh. According to various sources, property taxes began in ancient Egypt, spread around the world to Europe and Asia, and today remain one of the primary ways governments raise money to finance public services. For governments, property taxes have several advantages over other taxes, most notably that assessors can physically locate and value the property subject to tax, and tax collectors can sell it when tax-defaulted. While imposing a more severe penalty than nonpayment of other taxes, tax sales not only serve as a significant deterrent for non-payment, they allow land that is abandoned or defunct as evidenced by non-payment of taxes to be transferred to others who can put it to productive use, improving a community’s general wealth. Additionally, tax sales convert a property where owners are not paying taxes into one where not only are delinquent taxes repaid, but so are current taxes. Because deprivation of property is among the most severe penalties governments can impose for violations of law, state law sets forth an exhaustive process of notices, notifications, publications, and approvals that ensure taxpayers and parties of interest are aware of property tax delinquency, impending sale, and ability to claim any excess proceeds. There are few categorical exemptions from property tax, so any property owner cannot reasonably claim ignorance of their property tax obligations. Any deprivation of property resulting from a tax sale can only legally occur after tax collectors have satisfied several steps to collect lawfully due and payable taxes from taxpayers who have failed to pay taxes for several years.
5. Technicals. Committee staff recommends adding “and did not receive a bid that exceeded the minimum bid” before “unless” on Page 3, Line 18, and “unless the property or property interest was offered for sale under Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 3691) and did not receive a bid that exceeded the minimum bid” after “intent” on Page 4, Line 29.
Support and Opposition
(4/19/24)
Support: Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles
Apartment Owners Association of California, Inc.
Bizfed Central Valley
California Taxpayer Protection Committee
CalTax
Central Coast Taxpayers Association
Central Valley BizFed
Central Valley Taxpayers Association
Glendora Chamber of Commerce
Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (HJTA)
Los Angeles County Taxpayers Association
Monterey County Farm Bureau
Nisei Farmers League
Orange County Taxpayers’ Association
Pacific Legal Foundation
Placer County Taxpayers Association
San Joaquin County Farm Bureau
Solano County Taxpayers Association
Western Manufactured Housing Communities Association
1 Individual
Opposition: California Association of County Treasurers and Tax Collectors
California Housing Partnership Corporation
California State Association of Counties (CSAC)
Contra Costa County
County of Kern
County of Lake
County of Madera
Rural County Representatives of California (RCRC)
State Association of County Auditors
Urban Counties of California (UCC)
-- END --
Discussed in Hearing
Senate Standing Committee on Revenue and Taxation
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):