AB 2466: Medi-Cal managed care: network adequacy standards.
- Session Year: 2023-2024
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2024-04-18
Current Status:
Failed
(2024-05-16: In committee: Held under submission.)
Introduced
In Committee
First Chamber
In Committee
Second Chamber
Enacted
What does this bill do?
The bill tightens how the state judges and enforces Medi‑Cal managed care plans’ access and appointment rules by deeming a plan out of compliance when fewer than 85% of its network providers offer timely appointments or when the department finds evidence of access failures, and allows sanctions or contract termination. It also requires annual renewals of any approved alternative access standard with proof of recruitment efforts, expands reporting and EQRO data to show urgent/nonurgent and new/returning patient access, mandates direct testing (such as secret‑shopper checks) of appointment availability, and requires public annual updates on plans of correction.
The summary is provided by generative AI which can make mistakes. For original language, please view the details in the table below.
Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law authorizes the Director of Health Care Services to terminate a contract or impose sanctions if the director finds that a Medi-Cal managed care plan fails to comply with contract requirements, state or federal law or regulations, or the state plan or approved waivers, or for other good cause.
Existing law establishes, until January 1, 2026, certain time and distance and appointment time standards for specified Medi-Cal managed care covered services, consistent with federal regulations relating to network adequacy standards, to ensure that those services are available and accessible to enrollees of Medi-Cal managed care plans in a timely manner, as specified.
Under this bill, a Medi-Cal managed care plan would be deemed to be not in compliance with the appointment time standards if either (1) fewer than 85% of the network providers had an appointment available within the standards or (2) the department receives information establishing that the plan was unable to deliver timely, available, or accessible health care services to enrollees, as specified. Under the bill, failure to comply with the appointment time standard may result in contract termination or the issuance of sanctions as described above.
Existing law requires a Medi-Cal managed care plan to submit a request for alternative access standards if the plan cannot meet the time or distance standards. Under existing law, a plan is not required to submit a previously approved request on an annual basis, unless the plan requires modifications to its request. Existing law requires the plan to submit this previously approved request at least every 3 years for review and approval when the plan is required to demonstrate compliance with time or distance standards.
This bill would instead require a plan that has a previously approved alternative access standard to submit a renewal request on an annual basis, explaining which efforts the plan has made in the previous 12 months to mitigate or eliminate circumstances that justify the use of an alternative access standard, as specified. The bill would require the department to consider the reasonableness and effectiveness of the mitigating efforts as part of the renewal decision.
Existing law requires a Medi-Cal managed care plan to demonstrate, annually and upon request by the department, how the plan arranged for the delivery of Medi-Cal covered services to Medi-Cal enrollees, with a report measuring compliance, as specified. Existing law requires the department to annually evaluate a plans compliance with the standards and to annually publish a report.
This bill would, effective for contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2025, require the plans and departments reports to include certain information and require the departments evaluation to be performed using a direct testing method, as specified. Under the bill, failure to comply with these provisions may result in contract termination or the issuance of sanctions.
Existing law, as part of the federally required external quality review organization (EQRO) review of Medi-Cal managed care plans, requires the EQRO designated by the department to compile certain data, by plan and by county, for the purpose of informing the status of implementation of the above-described standards.
This bill would require that the data include, effective for contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2025, the number of requests for alternative access standards, categorized by new and returning patients, and the number of allowable exceptions for the appointment time standards, categorized by urgent and nonurgent appointment types and by new and returning patients.
Under existing law, in lieu of contract termination, the director has the power and authority to require or impose a plan of correction and issue one or more of specified sanctions against a contractor for findings of noncompliance or good cause.
This bill would require the department to monitor any plan of correction imposed by the director, with progress reported publicly no less than annually for the duration of the plan of correction.
Existing law authorizes the director to impose monetary sanctions based on any of specified circumstances, including, among others, a contractors failure to comply with network adequacy standards, failure to submit timely and accurate network provider data, or failure to timely and accurately process grievances or appeals. data.
This bill would would, for purposes of the particular circumstance described above, set forth definitions for the terms of timely and accurate network provider data.
Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law authorizes the Director of Health Care Services to terminate a contract or impose sanctions if the director finds that a Medi-Cal managed care plan fails to comply with contract requirements, state or federal law or regulations, or the state plan or approved waivers, or for other good cause.
Existing law establishes, until January 1, 2026, certain time and distance and appointment time standards for specified Medi-Cal managed care covered services, consistent with federal regulations relating to network adequacy standards, to ensure that those services are available and accessible to enrollees of Medi-Cal managed care plans in a timely manner, as specified.
Under this bill, a Medi-Cal managed care plan would be deemed to be not in compliance with the appointment time standards if either (1) fewer than 85% of the network providers had an appointment available within the standards or (2) the department receives information establishing that the plan was unable to deliver timely, available, or accessible health care services to enrollees, as specified. Under the bill, failure to comply with the appointment time standard may result in contract termination or the issuance of sanctions as described above.
Existing law requires a Medi-Cal managed care plan to submit a request for alternative access standards if the plan cannot meet the time or distance standards. Under existing law, a plan is not required to submit a previously approved request on an annual basis, unless the plan requires modifications to its request. Existing law requires the plan to submit this previously approved request at least every 3 years for review and approval when the plan is required to demonstrate compliance with time or distance standards.
This bill would instead require a plan that has a previously approved alternative access standard to submit a renewal request on an annual basis, explaining which efforts the plan has made in the previous 12 months to mitigate or eliminate circumstances that justify the use of an alternative access standard, as specified. The bill would require the department to consider the reasonableness and effectiveness of the mitigating efforts as part of the renewal decision.
Existing law requires a Medi-Cal managed care plan to demonstrate, annually and upon request by the department, how the plan arranged for the delivery of Medi-Cal covered services to Medi-Cal enrollees, with a report measuring compliance, as specified. Existing law requires the department to annually evaluate a plans compliance with the standards and to annually publish a report.
This bill would, effective for contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2025, require the plans and departments reports to include certain information and require the departments evaluation to be performed using a direct testing method, as specified. Under the bill, failure to comply with these provisions may result in contract termination or the issuance of sanctions.
Existing law, as part of the federally required external quality review organization (EQRO) review of Medi-Cal managed care plans, requires the EQRO designated by the department to compile certain data, by plan and by county, for the purpose of informing the status of implementation of the above-described standards.
This bill would require that the data include, effective for contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2025, the number of requests for alternative access standards, categorized by new and returning patients, and the number of allowable exceptions for the appointment time standards, categorized by urgent and nonurgent appointment types and by new and returning patients.
Under existing law, in lieu of contract termination, the director has the power and authority to require or impose a plan of correction and issue one or more of specified sanctions against a contractor for findings of noncompliance or good cause.
This bill would require the department to monitor any plan of correction imposed by the director, with progress reported publicly no less than annually for the duration of the plan of correction.
Existing law authorizes the director to impose monetary sanctions based on any of specified circumstances, including, among others, a contractors failure to comply with network adequacy standards, failure to submit timely and accurate network provider data, or failure to timely and accurately process grievances or appeals.
This bill would set forth definitions for the terms of timely and accurate network provider data.
Existing law establishes various state and local programs for the provision of mental health services within the jurisdiction of the State Department of Health Care Services, the State Department of Public Health, the California Behavioral Health Planning Council, the Department of Health Care Access and Information, and county public health or behavioral health departments, among other entities. Under existing law, those programs, services, and provisions include, among others, the Mental Health Services Act, the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act, the Children and Youth Behavioral Health Initiative, the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program, the Licensed Mental Health Service Provider Education Program, and Medi-Cal specialty mental health services.This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation relating to mental health.Existing law establishes various state and local programs for the provision of mental health services within the jurisdiction of the State Department of Health Care Services, the State Department of Public Health, the California Behavioral Health Planning Council, the Department of Health Care Access and Information, and county public health or behavioral health departments, among other entities. Under existing law, those programs, services, and provisions include, among others, the Mental Health Services Act, the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act, the Children and Youth Behavioral Health Initiative, the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program, the Licensed Mental Health Service Provider Education Program, and Medi-Cal specialty mental health services.
This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation relating to mental health.
(a)It is the intent of the Legislature that the department implement and monitor compliance with the time or distance requirements set forth in Sections 438.68, 438.206, and 438.207 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations and this section, to ensure that all Medi-Cal managed care covered services are available and accessible to enrollees of Medi-Cal managed care plans in a timely manner, as those standards were enacted in May 2016.
(b)Commencing January 1, 2018, for covered benefits under its contract, as applicable, a Medi-Cal managed care plan shall maintain a network of providers that are located within the following time or distance standards for the following services:
(1)For primary care, both adult and pediatric, 10 miles or 30 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence.
(2)For hospitals, 15 miles or 30 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence.
(3)For dental services provided by a Medi-Cal managed care plan, 10 miles or 30 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence.
(4)For obstetrics and gynecology primary care, 10 miles or 30 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence.
(c)Commencing July 1, 2018, for the covered benefits under its contracts, as applicable, a Medi-Cal managed care plan shall maintain a network of providers that are located within the following time or distance standards for the following services:
(1)For specialists, as defined in subdivision (i), adult and pediatric, including obstetric and gynecology specialty care, as follows:
(A)Up to 15 miles or 30 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Alameda, Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Orange, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara.
(B)Up to 30 miles or 60 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Marin, Placer, Riverside, San Joaquin, Santa Cruz, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, and Ventura.
(C)Up to 45 miles or 75 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Amador, Butte, El Dorado, Fresno, Kern, Kings, Lake, Madera, Merced, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, San Bernardino, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Sutter, Tulare, Yolo, and Yuba.
(D)Up to 60 miles or 90 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Alpine, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, Glenn, Humboldt, Imperial, Inyo, Lassen, Mariposa, Mendocino, Modoc, Mono, Plumas, San Benito, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Tehama, Trinity, and Tuolumne.
(2)For pharmacy services, 10 miles or 30 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence.
(3)For outpatient mental health services, as follows:
(A)Up to 15 miles or 30 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Alameda, Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Orange, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara.
(B)Up to 30 miles or 60 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Marin, Placer, Riverside, San Joaquin, Santa Cruz, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, and Ventura.
(C)Up to 45 miles or 75 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Amador, Butte, El Dorado, Fresno, Kern, Kings, Lake, Madera, Merced, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, San Bernardino, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Sutter, Tulare, Yolo, and Yuba.
(D)Up to 60 miles or 90 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Alpine, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, Glenn, Humboldt, Imperial, Inyo, Lassen, Mariposa, Mendocino, Modoc, Mono, Plumas, San Benito, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Tehama, Trinity, and Tuolumne.
(4)(A)For outpatient substance use disorder services other than opioid treatment programs, as follows:
(i)Up to 15 miles or 30 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Alameda, Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Orange, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara.
(ii)Up to 30 miles or 60 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Marin, Placer, Riverside, San Joaquin, Santa Cruz, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, and Ventura.
(iii)Up to 60 miles or 90 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Humboldt, Imperial, Inyo, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Mendocino, Merced, Modoc, Monterey, Mono, Napa, Nevada, Plumas, San Benito, San Bernardino, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, and Yuba.
(B)For opioid treatment programs, as follows:
(i)Up to 15 miles or 30 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Alameda, Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Orange, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara.
(ii)Up to 30 miles or 60 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Marin, Placer, Riverside, San Joaquin, Santa Cruz, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, and Ventura.
(iii)Up to 45 miles or 75 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Amador, Butte, El Dorado, Fresno, Kern, Kings, Lake, Madera, Merced, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, San Bernardino, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Sutter, Tulare, Yolo, and Yuba.
(iv)Up to 60 miles or 90 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Alpine, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, Glenn, Humboldt, Imperial, Inyo, Lassen, Mariposa, Mendocino, Modoc, Mono, Plumas, San Benito, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Tehama, Trinity, and Tuolumne.
(d)(1)(A)A Medi-Cal managed care plan shall comply with the appointment time standards developed pursuant to Section 1367.03 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 1300.67.2.2 of Title 28 of the California Code of Regulations, subject to any authorized exceptions in Section 1300.67.2.2 of Title 28 of the California Code of Regulations, and the standards set forth in contracts entered into between the department and Medi-Cal managed care plans.
(B)Commencing July 1, 2018, subparagraph (A) applies to Medi-Cal managed care plans that are not, as of January 1, 2018, subject to the appointment time standards described in subparagraph (A).
(C)A Medi-Cal managed care plan shall be deemed to be not in compliance with the appointment time standards described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) if either of the following circumstances exists:
(i)Fewer than 85 percent of the network providers, as calculated by the evaluation in subdivision (g), for a specific network had a nonurgent or urgent appointment available within the appointment time standards. Noncompliance shall be identified using the information reported to the department pursuant to subdivision (g).
(ii)The department receives information establishing that the Medi-Cal managed care plan was unable to deliver timely, available, or accessible health care services to enrollees. The department may consider any of the following factors in evaluating whether each instance identified is part of a pattern of noncompliance that is reasonably related:
(I)Each instance is a violation of the same standard described in subparagraph (A) or (B).
(II)Each instance involves the same network.
(III)Each instance involves the same provider group or subcontracted plan.
(IV)Each instance involves the same provider type.
(V)Each instance involves the same network provider.
(VI)Each instance occurs in the same region. For purposes of this subclause, region is a county in which a network provider practices and the counties next to or adjoining that county.
(VII)The number of enrollees in the Medi-Cal managed care plans network and the total number of instances identified as part of a pattern.
(VIII)Whether each instance occurred within the same 12-month period.
(IX)Whether each instance involves the same category of health care services.
(D)Failure to comply with this paragraph may result in contract termination or the issuance of sanctions pursuant to Section 14197.7.
(2)A Medi-Cal managed care plan shall comply with the following availability standards for skilled nursing facility services and intermediate care facility services, as follows:
(A)Within five business days of the request for the following counties: Alameda, Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Orange, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara.
(B)Within seven business days of the request for the following counties: Marin, Placer, Riverside, San Joaquin, Santa Cruz, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, and Ventura.
(C)Within 14 calendar days of the request for the following counties: Amador, Butte, El Dorado, Fresno, Kern, Kings, Lake, Madera, Merced, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, San Bernardino, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Sutter, Tulare, Yolo, and Yuba.
(D)Within 14 calendar days of the request for the following counties: Alpine, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, Glenn, Humboldt, Imperial, Inyo, Lassen, Mariposa, Mendocino, Modoc, Mono, Plumas, San Benito, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Tehama, Trinity, and Tuolumne.
(3)A county Drug Medi-Cal organized delivery system shall provide an appointment within three business days to an opioid treatment program.
(4)A dental managed care plan shall provide an appointment within four weeks of a request for routine pediatric dental services and within 30 calendar days of a request for specialist pediatric dental services.
(e)The department may authorize a Medi-Cal managed care plan to use clinically appropriate video synchronous interaction, as defined in paragraph (5) of subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code, as a means of demonstrating compliance with the time or distance standards established pursuant to this section, as defined by the department.
(f)(1)The department may develop policies for granting credit in the determination of compliance with time or distance standards established pursuant to this section when Medi-Cal managed care plans contract with specified providers to use clinically appropriate video synchronous interaction, as defined in paragraph (5) of subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code.
(2)The department, upon request of a Medi-Cal managed care plan, may authorize alternative access standards for the time or distance standards established under this section if either of the following occur:
(A)The requesting Medi-Cal managed care plan has exhausted all other reasonable options to obtain providers to meet the applicable standard.
(B)The department determines that the requesting Medi-Cal managed care plan has demonstrated that its delivery structure is capable of delivering the appropriate level of care and access.
(3)(A)If a Medi-Cal managed care plan cannot meet the time or distance standards set forth in this section, the Medi-Cal managed care plan shall submit a request for alternative access standards to the department, in the form and manner specified by the department.
(B)An alternative access standard request may be submitted at the same time as the Medi-Cal managed care plan submits its annual demonstration of compliance with time or distance standards, if known at that time and at any time the Medi-Cal managed care plan is unable to meet time or distance standards.
(C)A Medi-Cal managed care plan that has a previously approved alternative access standard shall submit a renewal request to the department for review and approval on an annual basis. The request shall explain which efforts the Medi-Cal managed care plan has made in the previous 12 months to mitigate or eliminate circumstances that justify the use of an alternative access standard, including documentation of its efforts to recruit new providers into its network. The department shall consider the reasonableness and effectiveness of the mitigating efforts as part of the renewal decision.
(D)A Medi-Cal managed care plan shall close out any corrective action plan deficiencies in a timely manner to ensure beneficiary access is adequate and shall continually work to improve access in its provider network.
(4)A request for alternative access standards shall be approved or denied on a ZIP Code and provider type, including specialty type, basis by the department within 90 days of submission of the request. The Medi-Cal managed care plan shall also include a description of the reasons justifying the alternative access standards based on those facts and circumstances. Effective no sooner than contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2020, the Medi-Cal managed care plan shall include a description on how the Medi-Cal managed care plan intends to arrange for beneficiaries to access covered services if the health care provider is located outside of the time or distance standards specified in subdivision (c). The department may stop the 90-day timeframe, on one or more occasions as necessary, in the event of an incomplete submission or to obtain additional information from the Medi-Cal managed care plan requesting the alternative access standards. Upon submission of sufficient additional information to the department, the 90-day timeframe shall resume at the same point in time it was previously stopped, except if there is less than 30 days remaining in which case the department shall approve or deny the request within 30 days of submission of sufficient additional information. If the department rejects the Medi-Cal managed care plans proposal, the department shall inform the Medi-Cal managed care plan of the departments reason for rejecting the proposal. The department shall post any approved alternative access standards on its internet website.
(5)As part of the departments evaluation of a request submitted by a Medi-Cal managed care plan to utilize an alternative access standard pursuant to this subdivision, the department shall evaluate and determine whether the resulting time or distance is reasonable to expect a beneficiary to travel to receive care.
(6)The department may authorize a Medi-Cal managed care plan to use clinically appropriate video synchronous interaction, as defined in paragraph (5) of subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code, as part of an alternative access standard request.
(g)(1)Effective for contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2018, a Medi-Cal managed care plan shall, on an annual basis and when requested by the department, demonstrate to the department the Medi-Cal managed care plans compliance with the time or distance and appointment time standards developed pursuant to this section. The report shall measure compliance separately for adult and pediatric services for primary care, behavioral health, and core specialist services.
(2)Effective for contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2020, the Medi-Cal managed care plan shall demonstrate, on an annual basis, and when requested by the department, to the department how the Medi-Cal managed care plan arranged for the delivery of Medi-Cal covered services to Medi-Cal enrollees, such as through the use of either Medi-Cal covered transportation or clinically appropriate video synchronous interaction, as specified in paragraph (6) of subdivision (f), if the enrollees of a Medi-Cal managed care plan needed to obtain health care services from a health care provider or a facility located outside of the time or distance standards, as specified in subdivision (c).
The report shall measure compliance separately for adult and pediatric services for primary care, behavioral health, and core specialist services.
(3)Effective for contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2018, the department shall evaluate on an annual basis a Medi-Cal managed care plans compliance with the time or distance and appointment time standards implemented pursuant to this section. This evaluation may include, but need not be limited to, annual and random surveys, investigation of complaints, grievances, or other indicia of noncompliance. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to limit the appeal rights of a Medi-Cal managed care plan under its contracts with the department.
(4)The department shall publish annually on its internet website a report that details the departments findings in evaluating a Medi-Cal managed care plans compliance under paragraph (2). At a minimum, the department shall specify in this report those Medi-Cal managed care plans, if any, that were subject to a corrective action plan due to noncompliance with the time or distance and appointment time standards implemented pursuant to this section during the applicable year and the basis for the departments finding of noncompliance. The report shall include a Medi-Cal managed care plans response to the corrective plan, if available.
(5)(A)Effective for contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2025, all of the following shall apply:
(i)The report created by a Medi-Cal managed care plan as described in paragraph (2) shall measure all of the following:(i)The report described in paragraph (1) shall measure both of the following:
(I)Compliance separately for new and returning patients.
(II)Compliance with a 48-hour urgent care standard for behavioral health appointments.
(III)Compliance with access standards for new and returning patients.(ii)The evaluation by the department as described in paragraph (3) shall be performed using a direct testing method, which may include, but need not be limited to, a secret shopper method. The direct testing shall be used to evaluate compliance with the appointment time standards set forth in subdivision (d) for both new and followup appointments. To determine compliance with the urgent care standard, the evaluation shall measure the networks ability to provide urgent care within 48 hours pursuant to Section 1367.03 of the Health and Safety Code and Section 1300.67.2.2(c)(5)(A) of Title 28 of the California Code of Regulations. The evaluation shall also utilize a method for accounting for and reporting the number of providers who are unavailable or unreachable for purposes of the evaluation.
(iii)The departments annual report described in paragraph (4) shall report information on unavailable or unreachable providers and how each plan will utilize this information to regularly maintain or update its provider directories.
(B)Failure to comply with this paragraph may result in contract termination or the issuance of sanctions pursuant to Section 14197.7.
(h)The department shall consult with Medi-Cal managed care plans, including dental managed care plans, mental health plans, and Drug Medi-Cal Organized Delivery System programs, health care providers, consumers, providers and consumers of long-term services and supports, and organizations representing Medi-Cal beneficiaries in the implementation of the requirements of this section.
(i)For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Medi-Cal managed care plan means any individual, organization, or entity that enters into a contract with the department to provide services to enrolled Medi-Cal beneficiaries pursuant to any of the following:
(A)Article 2.7 (commencing with Section 14087.3), including dental managed care programs developed pursuant to Section 14087.46.
(B)Article 2.8 (commencing with Section 14087.5).
(C)Article 2.81 (commencing with Section 14087.96).
(D)Article 2.82 (commencing with Section 14087.98).
(E)Article 2.9 (commencing with Section 14088).
(F)Article 2.91 (commencing with Section 14089).
(G)Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200), including dental managed care plans.
(H)Chapter 8.9 (commencing with Section 14700).
(I)A county Drug Medi-Cal organized delivery system authorized under the California Medi-Cal 2020 Demonstration pursuant to Article 5.5 (commencing with Section 14184) or a successor demonstration or waiver, as applicable.
(2)Specialist means any of the following:
(A)Cardiology/interventional cardiology.
(B)Nephrology.
(C)Dermatology.
(D)Neurology.
(E)Endocrinology.
(F)Ophthalmology.
(G)Ear, nose, and throat/otolaryngology.
(H)Orthopedic surgery.
(I)Gastroenterology.
(J)Physical medicine and rehabilitation.
(K)General surgery.
(L)Psychiatry.
(M)Hematology.
(N)Oncology.
(O)Pulmonology.
(P)HIV/AIDS specialists/infectious diseases.
(j)Notwithstanding Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, the department, without taking any further regulatory action, may implement, interpret, or make specific this section by means of all-county letters, plan letters, plan or provider bulletins, or similar instructions until the time regulations are adopted.
(k)The department shall seek any federal approvals it deems necessary to implement this section. This section shall be implemented only to the extent that any necessary federal approvals are obtained and federal financial participation is available and is not otherwise jeopardized.
(l)This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2026, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute that is enacted before January 1, 2026, deletes or extends that date.
SEC. 2.Section 14197.05 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:14197.05.(a)As part of the federally required external quality review organization (EQRO) review of Medi-Cal managed care plans in the annual detailed technical report required by Section 438.364 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, effective for contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2018, the EQRO designated by the department shall compile the data described in subdivision (b), by plan and by county, for the purpose of informing the status of implementation of the requirements of Section 14197.
(b)(1)The information compiled by the EQRO shall include all of the following:
(A)Number of requests for alternative access standards in the plan service area for time and distance, categorized by provider types, including specialists, by adult and pediatric, and, effective for contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2025, by new and returning patients.
(B)Number of allowable exceptions for the appointment time standard, if known, categorized by provider types, including specialists, by adult and pediatric, and, effective for contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2025, by urgent and nonurgent appointment types and by new and returning patients.
(C)Distance and driving time between the nearest network provider and ZIP Code of the beneficiary furthest from that provider for requests for alternative access standards.
(D)Approximate number of beneficiaries impacted by alternative access standards or allowable exceptions.
(E)Percentage of providers in the plan service area, by provider and specialty type, that are under a contract with a Medi-Cal managed care plan.
(F)The number of requests for alternative access standards approved or denied by ZIP Code and provider and specialty type, and the reasons for the approval or denial of the request for alternative access standards. If an approval is authorized, the reasons for approval shall identify whether the approval was granted for either of the following reasons:
(i)A provider was not located in the requested ZIP Code.
(ii)The Medi-Cal managed care plan was unable to enter into a contract with a provider or providers in the requested ZIP Code.
(G)The process of ensuring out-of-network access.
(H)Descriptions of contracting efforts and explanation for why a contract was not executed.
(I)Timeframe for approval or denial of a request for alternative access standards by the department.
(J)Consumer complaints, if any.
(2)The information described in paragraph (1) shall be presented in a chart format to enable comparison among counties, provider types, and plans.
(c)The EQRO shall develop a methodology to assess information that will help inform the experience of individuals placed in a skilled nursing facility or intermediate care facility and the distance that they are placed from their place of residence. The EQRO shall report the results from the use of this methodology in the EQRO annual Medi-Cal managed care plan technical report.
(d)The department shall comply with the requirements of subsection (c) of Section 438.364 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations in making the information described in this section publicly available.
SEC. 3.Section 14197.7 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:14197.7.(a)Notwithstanding any other law, if the director finds that any entity that contracts with the department for the delivery of health care services (contractor), including a Medi-Cal managed care plan or a prepaid health plan, fails to comply with contract requirements, state or federal law or regulations, or the state plan or approved waivers, or for other good cause, the director may terminate the contract or impose sanctions as set forth in this section. Good cause includes, but is not limited to, a finding of deficiency that results in improper denial or delay in the delivery of health care services, potential endangerment to patient care, disruption in the contractors provider network, failure to approve continuity of care, that claims accrued or to accrue have not or will not be recompensed, or a delay in required contractor reporting to the department.(b)The director may identify findings of noncompliance or good cause through any means, including, but not limited to, findings in audits, investigations, contract compliance reviews, quality improvement system monitoring, routine monitoring, facility site surveys, encounter and provider data submissions, grievances and appeals, network adequacy reviews, assessments of timely access requirements, reviews of utilization data, health plan rating systems, fair hearing decisions, complaints from beneficiaries and other stakeholders, whistleblowers, and contractor self-disclosures.(c)Except when the director determines that there is an immediate threat to the health of Medi-Cal beneficiaries receiving health care services from the contractor, at the request of the contractor, the department shall hold a public hearing to commence 30 days after notice of intent to terminate the contract has been received by the contractor. The department shall present evidence at the hearing showing good cause for the termination. The department shall assign an administrative law judge who shall provide a written recommendation to the department on the termination of the contract within 30 days after conclusion of the hearing. Reasonable notice of the hearing shall be given to the contractor, Medi-Cal beneficiaries receiving services through the contractor, and other interested parties, including any other persons and organizations as the director may deem necessary. The notice shall state the effective date of, and the reason for, the termination.(d)(1)In lieu of contract termination, the director shall have the power and authority to require or impose a plan of correction and issue one or more of the following sanctions against a contractor for findings of noncompliance or good cause, including, but not limited to, those specified in subdivision (a):(A)Temporarily or permanently suspend enrollment and marketing activities.(B)Require the contractor to suspend or terminate contractor personnel or subcontractors.(C)Issue one or more of the temporary suspension orders set forth in subdivision (j).(D)Impose temporary management consistent with the requirements specified in Section 438.706 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.(E)Suspend default enrollment of enrollees who do not select a contractor for the delivery of health care services.(F)Impose civil monetary sanctions consistent with the dollar amounts and violations specified in Section 438.704 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:(i)A limit of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for each determination of the following:(I)The contractor fails to provide medically necessary services that the contractor is required to provide, under law or under its contract with the department, to an enrollee covered under the contract.(II)The contractor misrepresents or falsifies information to an enrollee, potential enrollee, or health care provider.(III)The contractor distributes directly, or indirectly through an agent or independent contractor, marketing materials that have not been approved by the state or that contain false or materially misleading information.(ii)A limit of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) for each determination of the following:(I)The contractor conducts any act of discrimination against an enrollee on the basis of their health status or need for health care services. This includes termination of enrollment or refusal to reenroll a beneficiary, except as permitted under the Medicaid program, or any practice that would reasonably be expected to discourage enrollment by beneficiaries whose medical condition or history indicates probable need for substantial future medical services.(II)The contractor misrepresents or falsifies information that it furnishes to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services or to the department.(iii)A limit of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) for each beneficiary the director determines was not enrolled because of a discriminatory practice under clause (i) of subparagraph (B). This sanction is subject to the overall limit of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) under clause (ii).(2)Any plan of correction imposed by the director pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be monitored by the department and progress reported publicly no less than annually for the duration of the plan of correction.(e)(1)Notwithstanding the monetary sanctions imposed for the violations set forth in subparagraph (F) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the director may impose monetary sanctions in accordance with this section based on any of the following:(A)The contractor violates any federal or state statute or regulation.(B)The contractor violates any provision of its contract with the department.(C)The contractor violates any provision of the state plan or approved waivers.(D)The contractor fails to meet quality metrics or benchmarks established by the department. Any changes to the minimum quality metrics or benchmarks made by the department that are effective on or after January 1, 2020, shall be established in advance of the applicable reporting or performance measurement period, unless required by the federal government.(E)The contractor fails to demonstrate that it has an adequate network to meet anticipated utilization in its service area.(F)The contractor fails to comply with network adequacy standards, including, but not limited to, time and distance, timely access, and provider-to-beneficiary ratio requirements pursuant to standards and formulae that are set forth in federal or state law, regulation, state plan or contract, and that are posted in advance to the departments internet website.(G)The contractor fails to comply with the requirements of a corrective action plan.(H)The contractor fails to submit timely and accurate network provider data.(I)The director identifies deficiencies in the contractors delivery of health care services.(J)The director identifies deficiencies in the contractors operations, including the timely payment of claims.(K)The contractor fails to comply with reporting requirements, including, but not limited to, those set forth in Section 53862 of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations.(L)The contractor fails to timely and accurately process grievances or appeals.(2)For purposes of this subdivision, the following definitions apply:(A)Timely means no less than annually, unless otherwise specified by any other applicable law.(B)Accurate network provider data includes, but is not limited to, information made available to the plan through the evaluation described in paragraphs (3) and (5) of subdivision (g) of Section 14197 regarding unavailable or unreachable providers.(f)(1)Monetary sanctions imposed pursuant to subdivision (e) may be separately and independently assessed and may also be assessed for each day the contractor fails to correct an identified deficiency. For a deficiency that impacts beneficiaries, each beneficiary impacted constitutes a separate violation. Monetary sanctions shall be assessed in the following amounts:(A)Up to twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for a first violation.(B)Up to fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for a second violation.(C)Up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) for each subsequent violation.(2)For monetary sanctions imposed on a contractor that is funded from one or more of the realigned accounts described in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (n), the department shall calculate a percentage of the funds attributable to the contractor to be offset per month pursuant to paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (n) until the amount offset equals the amount of the penalty imposed pursuant to paragraph (1).(g)When assessing sanctions pursuant to this section, the director shall determine the appropriate amount of the penalty for each violation based upon one or more of the following nonexclusive factors:(1)The nature, scope, and gravity of the violation, including the potential harm or impact on beneficiaries.(2)The good or bad faith of the contractor.(3)The contractors history of violations.(4)The willfulness of the violation.(5)The nature and extent to which the contractor cooperated with the departments investigation.(6)The nature and extent to which the contractor aggravated or mitigated any injury or damage caused by the violation.(7)The nature and extent to which the contractor has taken corrective action to ensure the violation will not recur.(8)The financial status of the contractor, including whether the sanction will affect the ability of the contractor to come into compliance.(9)The financial cost of the health care service that was denied, delayed, or modified.(10)Whether the violation is an isolated incident.(11)The amount of the penalty necessary to deter similar violations in the future.(12)Any other mitigating factors presented by the contractor.(h)Except in exigent circumstances in which there is an immediate risk to the health of beneficiaries, as determined by the department, the director shall give reasonable written notice to the contractor of the intention to impose any of the sanctions authorized by this section and others who may be directly interested, including any other persons and organizations as the director may deem necessary. The notice shall include the effective date for, the duration of, and the reason for each sanction proposed by the director. A contractor may request the department to meet and confer with the contractor to discuss information and evidence that may impact the directors final decision to impose sanctions authorized by this section. The director shall grant a request to meet and confer prior to issuance of a final sanction if the contractor submits the request in writing to the department no later than two business days after the contractors receipt of the directors notice of intention to impose sanctions.(i)Notwithstanding subdivision (d), the director shall terminate a contract with a contractor that the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services has determined does not meet the requirements for participation in the Medicaid program contained in Subchapter XIX (commencing with Section 1396) of Chapter 7 of Title 42 of the United States Code.(j)(1)The department may make one or more of the following temporary suspension orders as an immediate sanction:(A)Temporarily suspend enrollment activities.(B)Temporarily suspend marketing activities.(C)Require the contractor to temporarily suspend specified personnel of the contractor.(D)Require the contractor to temporarily suspend participation by a specified subcontractor.(2)The temporary suspension orders shall be effective no earlier than 20 days after the notice specified in subdivision (k).(k)Prior to issuing a temporary suspension order, or temporarily withholding funds pursuant to subdivision (o), the department shall provide the contractor with a written notice. The notice shall state the departments intent to impose a temporary suspension or temporary withhold, and specify the nature and effective date of the temporary suspension or temporary withhold. The contractor shall have 30 calendar days from the date of receipt of the notice to file a written appeal with the department. Upon receipt of a written appeal filed by the contractor, the department shall within 15 days set the matter for hearing, which shall be held as soon as possible, but not later than 30 days after receipt of the notice of hearing by the contractor. The hearing may be continued at the request of the contractor if a continuance is necessary to permit presentation of an adequate defense. The temporary suspension order shall remain in effect until the hearing is completed and the department has made a final determination on the merits. However, the temporary suspension order shall be deemed vacated if the director fails to make a final determination on the merits within 60 days after the original hearing has been completed. The department shall stay imposition of a temporary withhold, pursuant to subdivision (o), until the hearing is completed and the department has made a final determination on the merits.(l)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), a contractor may request a hearing in connection with any sanctions applied pursuant to subdivision (d) or (e) within 15 working days after the notice of the effective date of the sanctions has been given, by sending a letter so stating to the address specified in the notice. The department shall stay collection of monetary sanctions upon receipt of the request for a hearing. Collection of the sanction shall remain stayed until the effective date of the final decision of the department.(2)With respect to mental health plans, the due process and appeals process specified in paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 14718 shall be made available in connection with any contract termination actions, temporary suspension orders, temporary withholds of funds pursuant to subdivision (o), and sanctions applied pursuant to subdivision (d) or (e).(m)Except as otherwise provided in this section, all hearings to review the imposition of sanctions, including temporary suspension orders, the withholding or offsetting of funds pursuant to subdivision (n), or the temporary withholding of funds pursuant to subdivision (o), shall be held pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 100171 of the Health and Safety Code.(n)(1)If the director imposes monetary sanctions pursuant to this section on a contractor, except for a contractor described in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, the amount of the sanction may be collected by withholding the amount from capitation or other associated payments owed to the contractor.(2)If the director imposes monetary sanctions on a contractor that is funded from the Mental Health Subaccount, the Mental Health Equity Subaccount, the Vehicle License Collection Account of the Local Revenue Fund, or the Mental Health Account, the director may offset the monetary sanctions from the respective account. The offset is subject to paragraph (2) of subdivision (q).(3)If the director imposes monetary sanctions on a contractor that is funded from the Behavioral Health Subaccount of the Local Revenue Fund 2011, the director may offset the monetary sanctions from that account from the distribution attributable to the applicable contractor. The offset is subject to paragraph (2) of subdivision (q).(4)If the director imposes monetary sanctions on a contractor that is funded from any other mental health or substance use disorder realignment funds from which the Controller is authorized to make distributions to the contractor, the director may offset the monetary sanctions from these funds if the funds described in paragraphs (2) and (3) are insufficient for the purposes described in this subdivision, as appropriate. The offset is subject to paragraph (2) of subdivision (q).(o)(1)Whenever the department determines that a mental health plan or any entity that contracts with the department to provide Drug Medi-Cal services has violated state or federal law, a requirement of this chapter, Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200), Chapter 8.8 (commencing with Section 14600), or Chapter 8.9 (commencing with Section 14700), or any regulations, the state plan, or a term or condition of an approved waiver, or a provision of its contract with the department, the department may temporarily withhold payments of federal financial participation and payments from the accounts listed in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (n). The department shall temporarily withhold amounts it deems necessary to ensure the mental health plan or the entity that contracts with the department to provide Drug Medi-Cal services promptly corrects the violation. The department shall release the temporarily withheld funds when it determines the mental health plan or the entity that contracts with the department to provide Drug Medi-Cal services has come into compliance.(2)A mental health plan, or any entity that contracts with the department to provide Drug Medi-Cal services, may appeal the imposition of a temporary withhold pursuant to this subdivision in accordance with the procedures described in subdivisions (k) and (m). Imposition of a temporary withhold shall be stayed until the effective date of the final decision of the department.(p)This section shall be read in conjunction with, and apply in addition to, any other applicable law that authorizes the department to impose sanctions or otherwise take remedial action upon contractors.(q)(1)Notwithstanding any other law, nonfederal moneys collected by the department pursuant to this section, except for moneys collected from a contractor funded from one or more of the realigned accounts described in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (n), shall be deposited into the General Fund for use, and upon appropriation by the Legislature, to address workforce issues in the Medi-Cal program and to improve access to care in the Medi-Cal program.(2)Monetary sanctions imposed via offset on a contractor that is funded from one or more of the realigned accounts described in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (n) shall be redeposited into the account from which the monetary sanctions were offset pursuant to paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (n). The department shall notify the Department of Finance of the percentage reduction for the affected county. The Department of Finance shall subsequently notify the Controller, and the Controller shall redistribute the monetary sanction amount to nonsanctioned counties based on each countys prorated share of the monthly base allocations from the realigned account. With respect to an individual contractor, the department shall not collect via offset more than 25 percent of the total amount of the funds distributed from the applicable account or accounts that are attributable to the contractor in a given month. If the department is not able to collect the full amount of monetary sanctions imposed on a contractor funded from one or more of the realigned accounts described in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (n) in a given month, the department shall continue to offset the amounts attributable to the contractor in subsequent months until the full amount of monetary sanctions has been collected.(r)(1)Notwithstanding Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, the department may implement, interpret, or make specific this section, in whole or in part, by means of plan or county letters, information notices, plan or provider bulletins, or other similar instructions, without taking any further regulatory action.(2)By July 1, 2025, the department shall adopt any regulations necessary to implement this section in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.(s)This section shall be implemented only to the extent that any necessary federal approvals have been obtained and that federal financial participation is available.(t)For purposes of this section, contractor means any individual, organization, or entity that enters into a contract with the department to provide services to enrolled Medi-Cal beneficiaries pursuant to any of the following:(1)Article 2.7 (commencing with Section 14087.3), including dental managed care programs developed pursuant to Section 14087.46.(2)Article 2.8 (commencing with Section 14087.5).(3)Article 2.81 (commencing with Section 14087.96).(4)Article 2.82 (commencing with Section 14087.98).(5)Article 2.9 (commencing with Section 14088).(6)Article 2.91 (commencing with Section 14089).(7)Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200), including dental managed care plans.(8)Chapter 8.9 (commencing with Section 14700).(9)A county Drug Medi-Cal organized delivery system authorized under the California Medi-Cal 2020 Demonstration pursuant to Article 5.5 (commencing with Section 14184) or a successor demonstration or waiver, as applicable.SEC. 3.Section 14197.7 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, as added by Section 111 of Chapter 790 of the Statutes of 2023, is amended to read:14197.7.(a)(1)Notwithstanding any other law, if the director finds that an entity that contracts with the department for the delivery of health care services (contractor), including a Medi-Cal managed care plan or a prepaid health plan, fails to comply with contract requirements, state or federal law or regulations, or the state plan or approved waivers, or for other good cause, the director may terminate the contract or impose sanctions as set forth in this section.
(2)Good cause includes, but is not limited to, a finding of deficiency that results in improper denial or delay in the delivery of health care services, potential endangerment to patient care, disruption in the contractors provider network, failure to approve continuity of care, that claims accrued or to accrue have not or will not be recompensed, or a delay in required contractor reporting to the department.
(b)The director may identify findings of noncompliance or good cause through any means, including, but not limited to, findings in audits, investigations, contract compliance reviews, quality improvement system monitoring, routine monitoring, facility site surveys, encounter and provider data submissions, grievances and appeals, network adequacy reviews, assessments of timely access requirements, reviews of utilization data, health plan rating systems, fair hearing decisions, complaints from beneficiaries and other stakeholders, whistleblowers, and contractor self-disclosures.
(c)(1)Except when the director determines there is an immediate threat to the health of Medi-Cal beneficiaries receiving health care services from the contractor, at the request of the contractor, the department shall hold a public hearing to commence 30 days after notice of intent to terminate the contract has been received by the contractor.
(2)The department shall present evidence at the hearing showing good cause for the termination.
(3)The department shall assign an administrative law judge who shall provide a written recommendation to the department on the termination of the contract within 30 days after conclusion of the hearing.
(4)(A)Reasonable notice of the hearing shall be given to the contractor, Medi-Cal beneficiaries receiving services through the contractor, and other interested parties, including any other person and organization the director may deem necessary.
(B)The notice shall state the effective date of, and the reason for, the termination.
(d)(1)In lieu of contract termination, the director shall have the power and authority to require or impose a plan of correction and issue one or more of the following sanctions against a contractor for findings of noncompliance or good cause, including, but not limited to, those specified in subdivision (a):
(1)(A)Temporarily or permanently suspend enrollment and marketing activities.
(2)(B)Require the contractor to suspend or terminate contractor personnel or subcontractors.
(3)(C)Issue one or more of the temporary suspension orders set forth in subdivision (j).
(4)(D)Impose temporary management consistent with the requirements specified in Section 438.706 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
(5)(E)Suspend default enrollment of enrollees who do not select a contractor for the delivery of health care services.
(6)(F)Impose civil monetary sanctions consistent with the dollar amounts and violations specified in Section 438.704 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
(A)(i)A limit of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for each determination of the following:
(i)(I)The contractor fails to provide medically necessary services that the contractor is required to provide, under law or under its contract with the department, to an enrollee covered under the contract.
(ii)(II)The contractor misrepresents or falsifies information to an enrollee, potential enrollee, or health care provider.
(iii)(III)The contractor distributes directly, or indirectly through an agent or independent contractor, marketing materials that have not been approved by the state or that contain false or materially misleading information.
(B)(ii)A limit of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) for each determination of the following:
(i)(I)The contractor conducts an act of discrimination against an enrollee on the basis of their health status or need for health care services. This includes termination of enrollment or refusal to reenroll a beneficiary, except as permitted under the Medicaid program, or a practice that would reasonably be expected to discourage enrollment by beneficiaries whose medical condition or history indicates probable need for substantial future medical services.
(ii)(II)The contractor misrepresents or falsifies information that it furnishes to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services or to the department.
(C)(iii)A limit of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) for each beneficiary the director determines was not enrolled because of a discriminatory practice under clause (i) of subparagraph (B). subclause (I) of clause (ii). This sanction is subject to the overall limit of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) under subparagraph (B). clause (ii).
(2)Any plan of correction imposed by the director pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be monitored by the department and progress reported publicly no less than annually for the duration of the plan of correction.
(e)Notwithstanding the monetary sanctions imposed for the violations set forth in paragraph (6) subparagraph (F) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the director may impose monetary sanctions in accordance with this section based on any of the following:
(1)The contractor violates a federal or state statute or regulation.
(2)The contractor violates a provision of its contract with the department.
(3)The contractor violates a provision of the state plan or approved waivers.
(4)The contractor fails to meet quality metrics or benchmarks established by the department. Any changes to the minimum quality metrics or benchmarks made by the department that are effective on or after January 1, 2020, shall be established in advance of the applicable reporting or performance measurement period, unless required by the federal government.
(5)The contractor fails to demonstrate that it has an adequate network to meet anticipated utilization in its service area.
(6)The contractor fails to comply with network adequacy standards, including, but not limited to, time and distance, timely access, and provider-to-beneficiary ratio requirements pursuant to standards and formulae that are set forth in federal or state law, regulation, state plan, or contract and that are posted in advance to the departments internet website.
(7)The contractor fails to comply with the requirements of a corrective action plan.
(8)(A)The contractor fails to submit timely and accurate network provider data.
(B)For purposes of subparagraph (A), the following definitions apply:
(i)Timely means no less than annually, unless otherwise specified by any other applicable law.
(ii)Accurate network provider data includes, but is not limited to, information made available to the plan through the evaluation described in paragraphs (3) and (5) of subdivision (g) of Section 14197 regarding unavailable or unreachable providers.
(9)The director identifies deficiencies in the contractors delivery of health care services.
(10)The director identifies deficiencies in the contractors operations, including the timely payment of claims.
(11)The contractor fails to comply with reporting requirements, including, but not limited to, those set forth in Section 53862 of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations.
(12)The contractor fails to timely and accurately process grievances or appeals.
(f)(1)Monetary sanctions imposed pursuant to subdivision (e) may be separately and independently assessed and may also be assessed for each day the contractor fails to correct an identified deficiency. For a deficiency that impacts beneficiaries, each beneficiary impacted constitutes a separate violation. Monetary sanctions shall be assessed in the following amounts:
(A)Up to twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for a first violation.
(B)Up to fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for a second violation.
(C)Up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) for each subsequent violation.
(2)For monetary sanctions imposed on a contractor that is funded from one or more of the realigned accounts described in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (n), the department shall calculate a percentage of the funds attributable to the contractor to be offset per month pursuant to paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (n) until the amount offset equals the amount of the penalty imposed pursuant to paragraph (1).
(g)When assessing sanctions pursuant to this section, the director shall determine the appropriate amount of the penalty for each violation based upon one or more of the following nonexclusive factors:
(1)The nature, scope, and gravity of the violation, including the potential harm or impact on beneficiaries.
(2)The good or bad faith of the contractor.
(3)The contractors history of violations.
(4)The willfulness of the violation.
(5)The nature and extent to which the contractor cooperated with the departments investigation.
(6)The nature and extent to which the contractor aggravated or mitigated any injury or damage caused by the violation.
(7)The nature and extent to which the contractor has taken corrective action to ensure the violation will not recur.
(8)The financial status of the contractor, including whether the sanction will affect the ability of the contractor to come into compliance.
(9)The financial cost of the health care service that was denied, delayed, or modified.
(10)Whether the violation is an isolated incident.
(11)The amount of the penalty necessary to deter similar violations in the future.
(12)Other mitigating factors presented by the contractor.
(h)(1)Except in exigent circumstances in which there is an immediate risk to the health of beneficiaries, as determined by the department, the director shall give reasonable written notice to the contractor of the intention to impose any of the sanctions authorized by this section and others who may be directly interested, including any other persons and organizations the director may deem necessary.
(2)The notice shall include the effective date for, the duration of, and the reason for each sanction proposed by the director.
(3)A contractor may request the department to meet and confer with the contractor to discuss information and evidence that may impact the directors final decision to impose sanctions authorized by this section.
(4)The director shall grant a request to meet and confer prior to issuance of a final sanction if the contractor submits the request in writing to the department no later than two business days after the contractors receipt of the directors notice of intention to impose sanctions.
(i)Notwithstanding subdivision (d), the director shall terminate a contract with a contractor that the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services has determined does not meet the requirements for participation in the Medicaid program contained in Subchapter XIX (commencing with Section 1396) of Chapter 7 of Title 42 of the United States Code.
(j)(1)The department may make one or more of the following temporary suspension orders as an immediate sanction:
(A)Temporarily suspend enrollment activities.
(B)Temporarily suspend marketing activities.
(C)Require the contractor to temporarily suspend specified personnel of the contractor.
(D)Require the contractor to temporarily suspend participation by a specified subcontractor.
(2)The temporary suspension orders shall be effective no earlier than 20 days after the notice specified in subdivision (k).
(k)(1)Prior to issuing a temporary suspension order, or temporarily withholding funds pursuant to subdivision (o), the department shall provide the contractor with a written notice.
(2)The notice shall state the departments intent to impose a temporary suspension or temporary withhold and specify the nature and effective date of the temporary suspension or temporary withhold.
(3)The contractor shall have 30 calendar days from the date of receipt of the notice to file a written appeal with the department.
(4)Upon receipt of a written appeal filed by the contractor, the department shall, within 15 days, set the matter for hearing, which shall be held as soon as possible but not later than 30 days after receipt of the notice of hearing by the contractor.
(5)The hearing may be continued at the request of the contractor if a continuance is necessary to permit presentation of an adequate defense.
(6)The temporary suspension order shall remain in effect until the hearing is completed and the department has made a final determination on the merits. However, the temporary suspension order shall be deemed vacated if the director fails to make a final determination on the merits within 60 days of the close of the record for the matter.
(7)The department shall stay imposition of a temporary withhold, pursuant to subdivision (o), until the hearing is completed and the department has made a final determination on the merits within 60 days of the close of the record for the matter.
(l)(1)A contractor may request a hearing in connection with sanctions applied pursuant to subdivision (d) or (e) within 15 working days after the notice of the effective date of the sanctions has been given by sending a letter so stating to the address specified in the notice.
(2)The department shall stay collection of monetary sanctions upon receipt of the request for a hearing.
(3)Collection of the sanction shall remain stayed until the effective date of the final decision of the department.
(m)Except as otherwise provided in this section, all hearings to review the imposition of sanctions, including temporary suspension orders, the withholding or offsetting of funds pursuant to subdivision (n), or the temporary withholding of funds pursuant to subdivision (o) shall be held pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 100171 of the Health and Safety Code.
(n)(1)If the director imposes monetary sanctions pursuant to this section on a contractor, except for a contractor described in paragraphs (2) to (5), inclusive, the amount of the sanction may be collected by withholding the amount from capitation or other associated payments owed to the contractor.
(2)If the director imposes monetary sanctions on a contractor that is funded from the Mental Health Subaccount, the Mental Health Equity Subaccount, the Vehicle License Collection Account of the Local Revenue Fund, or the Mental Health Account, the director may offset the monetary sanctions from the respective account. The offset is subject to paragraph (2) of subdivision (q).
(3)If the director imposes monetary sanctions on a contractor that is funded from the Behavioral Health Subaccount of the Local Revenue Fund 2011, the director may offset the monetary sanctions from that account from the distribution attributable to the applicable contractor. The offset is subject to paragraph (2) of subdivision (q).
(4)If the director imposes monetary sanctions on a contractor that is funded from another mental health or substance use disorder realignment fund from which the Controller is authorized to make distributions to the contractor, the director may offset the monetary sanctions from these funds if the funds described in paragraphs (2) and (3) are insufficient for the purposes described in this subdivision, as appropriate. The offset is subject to paragraph (2) of subdivision (q).
(5)(A)If the director imposes monetary sanctions pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 5963.04, the director may offset the monetary sanctions from the Behavioral Health Services Fund from the distribution attributable to the applicable contractor.
(B)With respect to an individual contractor, the department shall not collect via offset more than 25 percent of the total amount of the funds distributed from the Behavioral Health Services Fund that are attributable to the contractor in a given month.
(C)If the department is not able to collect the full amount of monetary sanctions imposed on a contractor in a given month, the department shall continue to offset the amounts attributable to the contractor in subsequent months until the full amount of monetary sanctions has been collected. The offset is subject to paragraph (3) of subdivision (q).
(o)(1)(A)Whenever the department determines that a mental health plan or an entity that contracts with the department to provide Drug Medi-Cal services has violated state or federal law, a requirement of this chapter, Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200), Chapter 8.8 (commencing with Section 14600), or Chapter 8.9 (commencing with Section 14700), or any regulations, the state plan, a term or condition of an approved waiver, or a provision of its contract with the department, the department may temporarily withhold payments of federal financial participation and payments from the accounts listed in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (n).
(B)The department shall temporarily withhold amounts it deems necessary to ensure the mental health plan or the entity that contracts with the department to provide Drug Medi-Cal services promptly corrects the violation.
(C)The department shall release the temporarily withheld funds when it determines the mental health plan or the entity that contracts with the department to provide Drug Medi-Cal services has come into compliance.
(2)(A)A mental health plan or an entity that contracts with the department to provide Drug Medi-Cal services may appeal the imposition of a temporary withhold pursuant to this subdivision in accordance with the procedures described in subdivisions (k) and (m).
(B)Imposition of a temporary withhold shall be stayed until the effective date of the final decision of the department.
(p)This section shall be read in conjunction with, and apply in addition to, any other applicable law that authorizes the department to impose sanctions or otherwise take remedial action upon contractors.
(q)(1)Notwithstanding any other law, nonfederal moneys collected by the department pursuant to this section, except for moneys collected from a contractor funded from one or more of the realigned accounts described in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (n), shall be deposited into the General Fund for use and, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to address workforce issues in the Medi-Cal program and improve access to care in the Medi-Cal program.
(2)(A)Monetary sanctions imposed via offset on a contractor that is funded from one or more of the realigned accounts described in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (n) shall be redeposited into the account from which the monetary sanctions were offset pursuant to paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (n).
(B)The department shall notify the Department of Finance of the percentage reduction for the affected county.
(C)The Department of Finance shall subsequently notify the Controller, and the Controller shall redistribute the monetary sanction amount to nonsanctioned counties based on each countys prorated share of the monthly base allocations from the realigned account.
(D)With respect to an individual contractor, the department shall not collect via offset more than 25 percent of the total amount of the funds distributed from the applicable account or accounts that are attributable to the contractor in a given month.
(E)If the department is not able to collect the full amount of monetary sanctions imposed on a contractor funded from one or more of the realigned accounts described in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (n) in a given month, the department shall continue to offset the amounts attributable to the contractor in subsequent months until the full amount of monetary sanctions has been collected.
(3)Monetary sanctions imposed via offset on a contractor pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 5963.04 shall be redeposited into the account from which the monetary sanctions were offset pursuant to paragraph (5) of subdivision (n).
(r)Notwithstanding Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, the department may implement, interpret, or make specific this section, in whole or in part, by means of plan or county letters, information notices, plan or provider bulletins, or other similar instructions without taking any further regulatory action.
(s)This section shall be implemented only to the extent that necessary federal approvals have been obtained and that federal financial participation is available.
(t)For purposes of this section, contractor means an individual, organization, or entity that enters into a contract with the department to provide services to enrolled Medi-Cal beneficiaries or other individuals receiving behavioral health services, as applicable, pursuant to any of the following:
(1)Article 2.7 (commencing with Section 14087.3), including dental managed care programs developed pursuant to Section 14087.46.
(2)Article 2.8 (commencing with Section 14087.5).
(3)Article 2.81 (commencing with Section 14087.96).
(4)Article 2.82 (commencing with Section 14087.98).
(5)Article 2.9 (commencing with Section 14088).
(6)Article 2.91 (commencing with Section 14089).
(7)Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200), including dental managed care plans.
(8)Chapter 8.9 (commencing with Section 14700).
(9)A county Drug Medi-Cal organized delivery system authorized under the California Medi-Cal 2020 Demonstration pursuant to Article 5.5 (commencing with Section 14184) or a successor demonstration or waiver, as applicable.
(10)Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 5650) of Part 2 of Division 5, solely for purposes of imposition of corrective action plans, monetary sanctions, or temporary withholds pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 5963.04.
(11)Section 12534 of the Government Code.
(u)This section shall become operative on January 1, 2025, if amendments to the Mental Health Services Act are approved by the voters at the March 5, 2024, statewide primary election.
(a)It is the intent of the Legislature that the department implement and monitor compliance with the time or distance requirements set forth in Sections 438.68, 438.206, and 438.207 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations and this section, to ensure that all Medi-Cal managed care covered services are available and accessible to enrollees of Medi-Cal managed care plans in a timely manner, as those standards were enacted in May 2016.
(b)Commencing January 1, 2018, for covered benefits under its contract, as applicable, a Medi-Cal managed care plan shall maintain a network of providers that are located within the following time or distance standards for the following services:
(1)For primary care, both adult and pediatric, 10 miles or 30 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence.
(2)For hospitals, 15 miles or 30 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence.
(3)For dental services provided by a Medi-Cal managed care plan, 10 miles or 30 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence.
(4)For obstetrics and gynecology primary care, 10 miles or 30 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence.
(c)Commencing July 1, 2018, for the covered benefits under its contracts, as applicable, a Medi-Cal managed care plan shall maintain a network of providers that are located within the following time or distance standards for the following services:
(1)For specialists, as defined in subdivision (i), adult and pediatric, including obstetric and gynecology specialty care, as follows:
(A)Up to 15 miles or 30 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Alameda, Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Orange, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara.
(B)Up to 30 miles or 60 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Marin, Placer, Riverside, San Joaquin, Santa Cruz, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, and Ventura.
(C)Up to 45 miles or 75 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Amador, Butte, El Dorado, Fresno, Kern, Kings, Lake, Madera, Merced, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, San Bernardino, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Sutter, Tulare, Yolo, and Yuba.
(D)Up to 60 miles or 90 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Alpine, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, Glenn, Humboldt, Imperial, Inyo, Lassen, Mariposa, Mendocino, Modoc, Mono, Plumas, San Benito, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Tehama, Trinity, and Tuolumne.
(2)For pharmacy services, 10 miles or 30 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence.
(3)For outpatient mental health services, as follows:
(A)Up to 15 miles or 30 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Alameda, Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Orange, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara.
(B)Up to 30 miles or 60 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Marin, Placer, Riverside, San Joaquin, Santa Cruz, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, and Ventura.
(C)Up to 45 miles or 75 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Amador, Butte, El Dorado, Fresno, Kern, Kings, Lake, Madera, Merced, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, San Bernardino, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Sutter, Tulare, Yolo, and Yuba.
(D)Up to 60 miles or 90 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Alpine, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, Glenn, Humboldt, Imperial, Inyo, Lassen, Mariposa, Mendocino, Modoc, Mono, Plumas, San Benito, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Tehama, Trinity, and Tuolumne.
(4)(A)For outpatient substance use disorder services other than opioid treatment programs, as follows:
(i)Up to 15 miles or 30 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Alameda, Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Orange, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara.
(ii)Up to 30 miles or 60 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Marin, Placer, Riverside, San Joaquin, Santa Cruz, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, and Ventura.
(iii)Up to 60 miles or 90 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Humboldt, Imperial, Inyo, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Mendocino, Merced, Modoc, Monterey, Mono, Napa, Nevada, Plumas, San Benito, San Bernardino, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, and Yuba.
(B)For opioid treatment programs, as follows:
(i)Up to 15 miles or 30 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Alameda, Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Orange, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara.
(ii)Up to 30 miles or 60 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Marin, Placer, Riverside, San Joaquin, Santa Cruz, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, and Ventura.
(iii)Up to 45 miles or 75 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Amador, Butte, El Dorado, Fresno, Kern, Kings, Lake, Madera, Merced, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, San Bernardino, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Sutter, Tulare, Yolo, and Yuba.
(iv)Up to 60 miles or 90 minutes from the beneficiarys place of residence for the following counties: Alpine, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, Glenn, Humboldt, Imperial, Inyo, Lassen, Mariposa, Mendocino, Modoc, Mono, Plumas, San Benito, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Tehama, Trinity, and Tuolumne.
(d)(1)(A)A Medi-Cal managed care plan shall comply with the appointment time standards developed pursuant to Section 1367.03 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 1300.67.2.2 of Title 28 of the California Code of Regulations, subject to any authorized exceptions in Section 1300.67.2.2 of Title 28 of the California Code of Regulations, and the standards set forth in contracts entered into between the department and Medi-Cal managed care plans.
(B)Commencing July 1, 2018, subparagraph (A) applies to Medi-Cal managed care plans that are not, as of January 1, 2018, subject to the appointment time standards described in subparagraph (A).
(C)A Medi-Cal managed care plan shall be deemed to be not in compliance with the appointment time standards described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) if either of the following circumstances exists:
(i)Fewer than 85 percent of the network providers, as calculated by the evaluation in subdivision (g), for a specific network had a nonurgent or urgent appointment available within the appointment time standards. Noncompliance shall be identified using the information reported to the department pursuant to subdivision (g).
(ii)The department receives information establishing that the Medi-Cal managed care plan was unable to deliver timely, available, or accessible health care services to enrollees. The department may consider any of the following factors in evaluating whether each instance identified is part of a pattern of noncompliance that is reasonably related:
(I)Each instance is a violation of the same standard described in subparagraph (A) or (B).
(II)Each instance involves the same network.
(III)Each instance involves the same provider group or subcontracted plan.
(IV)Each instance involves the same provider type.
(V)Each instance involves the same network provider.
(VI)Each instance occurs in the same region. For purposes of this subclause, region is a county in which a network provider practices and the counties next to or adjoining that county.
(VII)The number of enrollees in the Medi-Cal managed care plans network and the total number of instances identified as part of a pattern.
(VIII)Whether each instance occurred within the same 12-month period.
(IX)Whether each instance involves the same category of health care services.
(D)Failure to comply with this paragraph may result in contract termination or the issuance of sanctions pursuant to Section 14197.7.
(2)A Medi-Cal managed care plan shall comply with the following availability standards for skilled nursing facility services and intermediate care facility services, as follows:
(A)Within five business days of the request for the following counties: Alameda, Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Orange, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara.
(B)Within seven business days of the request for the following counties: Marin, Placer, Riverside, San Joaquin, Santa Cruz, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, and Ventura.
(C)Within 14 calendar days of the request for the following counties: Amador, Butte, El Dorado, Fresno, Kern, Kings, Lake, Madera, Merced, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, San Bernardino, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Sutter, Tulare, Yolo, and Yuba.
(D)Within 14 calendar days of the request for the following counties: Alpine, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, Glenn, Humboldt, Imperial, Inyo, Lassen, Mariposa, Mendocino, Modoc, Mono, Plumas, San Benito, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Tehama, Trinity, and Tuolumne.
(3)A county Drug Medi-Cal organized delivery system shall provide an appointment within three business days to an opioid treatment program.
(4)A dental managed care plan shall provide an appointment within four weeks of a request for routine pediatric dental services and within 30 calendar days of a request for specialist pediatric dental services.
(e)The department may authorize a Medi-Cal managed care plan to use clinically appropriate video synchronous interaction, as defined in paragraph (5) of subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code, as a means of demonstrating compliance with the time or distance standards established pursuant to this section, as defined by the department.
(f)(1)The department may develop policies for granting credit in the determination of compliance with time or distance standards established pursuant to this section when Medi-Cal managed care plans contract with specified providers to use clinically appropriate video synchronous interaction, as defined in paragraph (5) of subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code.
(2)The department, upon request of a Medi-Cal managed care plan, may authorize alternative access standards for the time or distance standards established under this section if either of the following occur:
(A)The requesting Medi-Cal managed care plan has exhausted all other reasonable options to obtain providers to meet the applicable standard.
(B)The department determines that the requesting Medi-Cal managed care plan has demonstrated that its delivery structure is capable of delivering the appropriate level of care and access.
(3)(A)If a Medi-Cal managed care plan cannot meet the time or distance standards set forth in this section, the Medi-Cal managed care plan shall submit a request for alternative access standards to the department, in the form and manner specified by the department.
(B)An alternative access standard request may be submitted at the same time as the Medi-Cal managed care plan submits its annual demonstration of compliance with time or distance standards, if known at that time and at any time the Medi-Cal managed care plan is unable to meet time or distance standards.
(C)A Medi-Cal managed care plan is not required to submit a previously approved alternative access standard request to the department for review and approval on an annual basis, unless the Medi-Cal managed care plan requires modifications to its previously approved request. However, the Medi-Cal managed care plan shall submit this previously approved alternative access standard request to the department at least every three years for review and approval when the plan is required to demonstrate compliance with time or distance standards.(C)A Medi-Cal managed care plan that has a previously approved alternative access standard shall submit a renewal request to the department for review and approval on an annual basis. The request shall explain which efforts the Medi-Cal managed care plan has made in the previous 12 months to mitigate or eliminate circumstances that justify the use of an alternative access standard, including documentation of its efforts to recruit new providers into its network. The department shall consider the reasonableness and effectiveness of the mitigating efforts as part of the renewal decision.
(D)A Medi-Cal managed care plan shall close out any corrective action plan deficiencies in a timely manner to ensure beneficiary access is adequate and shall continually work to improve access in its provider network.
(4)A request for alternative access standards shall be approved or denied on a ZIP Code and provider type, including specialty type, basis by the department within 90 days of submission of the request. The Medi-Cal managed care plan shall also include a description of the reasons justifying the alternative access standards based on those facts and circumstances. Effective no sooner than contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2020, the Medi-Cal managed care plan shall include a description on how the Medi-Cal managed care plan intends to arrange for beneficiaries to access covered services if the health care provider is located outside of the time or distance standards specified in subdivision (c). The department may stop the 90-day timeframe, on one or more occasions as necessary, in the event of an incomplete submission or to obtain additional information from the Medi-Cal managed care plan requesting the alternative access standards. Upon submission of sufficient additional information to the department, the 90-day timeframe shall resume at the same point in time it was previously stopped, except if there is less than 30 days remaining in which case the department shall approve or deny the request within 30 days of submission of sufficient additional information. If the department rejects the Medi-Cal managed care plans proposal, the department shall inform the Medi-Cal managed care plan of the departments reason for rejecting the proposal. The department shall post any approved alternative access standards on its internet website.
(5)As part of the departments evaluation of a request submitted by a Medi-Cal managed care plan to utilize an alternative access standard pursuant to this subdivision, the department shall evaluate and determine whether the resulting time or distance is reasonable to expect a beneficiary to travel to receive care.
(6)The department may authorize a Medi-Cal managed care plan to use clinically appropriate video synchronous interaction, as defined in paragraph (5) of subdivision (a) of Section 2290.5 of the Business and Professions Code, as part of an alternative access standard request.
(g)(1)Effective for contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2018, a Medi-Cal managed care plan shall, on an annual basis and when requested by the department, demonstrate to the department the Medi-Cal managed care plans compliance with the time or distance and appointment time standards developed pursuant to this section. The report shall measure compliance separately for adult and pediatric services for primary care, behavioral health, and core specialist services.
(2)Effective for contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2020, the Medi-Cal managed care plan shall demonstrate, on an annual basis, and when requested by the department, to the department how the Medi-Cal managed care plan arranged for the delivery of Medi-Cal covered services to Medi-Cal enrollees, such as through the use of either Medi-Cal covered transportation or clinically appropriate video synchronous interaction, as specified in paragraph(6) paragraph (6) of subdivision (f), if the enrollees of a Medi-Cal managed care plan needed to obtain health care services from a health care provider or a facility located outside of the time or distance standards, as specified in subdivision (c).
The report shall measure compliance separately for adult and pediatric services for primary care, behavioral health, and core specialist services.
(3)Effective for contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2018, the department shall evaluate on an annual basis a Medi-Cal managed care plans compliance with the time or distance and appointment time standards implemented pursuant to this section. This evaluation may include, but need not be limited to, annual and random surveys, investigation of complaints, grievances, or other indicia of noncompliance. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to limit the appeal rights of a Medi-Cal managed care plan under its contracts with the department.
(4)The department shall publish annually on its internet website a report that details the departments findings in evaluating a Medi-Cal managed care plans compliance under paragraph (2). At a minimum, the department shall specify in this report those Medi-Cal managed care plans, if any, that were subject to a corrective action plan due to noncompliance with the time or distance and appointment time standards implemented pursuant to this section during the applicable year and the basis for the departments finding of noncompliance. The report shall include a Medi-Cal managed care plans response to the corrective plan, if available.
(5)(A)Effective for contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2025, all of the following shall apply:
(i)The report created by a Medi-Cal managed care plan as described in paragraph (2) shall measure all of the following:
(I)Compliance separately for new and returning patients.
(II)Compliance with a 48-hour urgent care standard for behavioral health appointments.
(III)Compliance with access standards for new and returning patients.
(ii)The evaluation by the department as described in paragraph (3) shall be performed using a direct testing method, which may include, but need not be limited to, a secret shopper method. The direct testing shall be used to evaluate compliance with the appointment time standards set forth in subdivision (d) for both new and followup appointments. To determine compliance with the urgent care standard, the evaluation shall measure the networks ability to provide urgent care within 48 hours pursuant to Section 1367.03 of the Health and Safety Code and Section 1300.67.2.2(c)(5)(A) of Title 28 of the California Code of Regulations. The evaluation shall also utilize a method for accounting for and reporting the number of providers who are unavailable or unreachable for purposes of the evaluation.
(iii)The departments annual report described in paragraph (4) shall report information on unavailable or unreachable providers and how each plan will utilize this information to regularly maintain or update its provider directories.
(B)Failure to comply with this paragraph may result in contract termination or the issuance of sanctions pursuant to Section 14197.7.
(h)The department shall consult with Medi-Cal managed care plans, including dental managed care plans, mental health plans, and Drug Medi-Cal Organized Delivery System programs, health care providers, consumers, providers and consumers of long-term services and supports, and organizations representing Medi-Cal beneficiaries in the implementation of the requirements of this section.
(i)For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Medi-Cal managed care plan means any individual, organization, or entity that enters into a contract with the department to provide services to enrolled Medi-Cal beneficiaries pursuant to any of the following:
(A)Article 2.7 (commencing with Section 14087.3), including dental managed care programs developed pursuant to Section 14087.46.
(B)Article 2.8 (commencing with Section 14087.5).
(C)Article 2.81 (commencing with Section 14087.96).
(D)Article 2.82 (commencing with Section 14087.98).
(E)Article 2.9 (commencing with Section 14088).
(F)Article 2.91 (commencing with Section 14089).
(G)Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200), including dental managed care plans.
(H)Chapter 8.9 (commencing with Section 14700).
(I)A county Drug Medi-Cal organized delivery system authorized under the California Medi-Cal 2020 Demonstration pursuant to Article 5.5 (commencing with Section 14184) or a successor demonstration or waiver, as applicable.
(2)Specialist means any of the following:
(A)Cardiology/interventional cardiology.
(B)Nephrology.
(C)Dermatology.
(D)Neurology.
(E)Endocrinology.
(F)Ophthalmology.
(G)Ear, nose, and throat/otolaryngology.
(H)Orthopedic surgery.
(I)Gastroenterology.
(J)Physical medicine and rehabilitation.
(K)General surgery.
(L)Psychiatry.
(M)Hematology.
(N)Oncology.
(O)Pulmonology.
(P)HIV/AIDS specialists/infectious diseases.
(j)Notwithstanding Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, the department, without taking any further regulatory action, may implement, interpret, or make specific this section by means of all-county letters, plan letters, plan or provider bulletins, or similar instructions until the time regulations are adopted.
(k)The department shall seek any federal approvals it deems necessary to implement this section. This section shall be implemented only to the extent that any necessary federal approvals are obtained and federal financial participation is available and is not otherwise jeopardized.
(l)This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2026, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute that is enacted before January 1, 2026, deletes or extends that date.
SEC. 2.Section 14197.05 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:14197.05.(a)As part of the federally required external quality review organization (EQRO) review of Medi-Cal managed care plans in the annual detailed technical report required by Section 438.364 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, effective for contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2018, the EQRO designated by the department shall compile the data described in subdivision (b), by plan and by county, for the purpose of informing the status of implementation of the requirements of Section 14197.
(b)(1)The information compiled by the EQRO shall include all of the following:
(A)Number of requests for alternative access standards in the plan service area for time and distance, categorized by provider types, including specialists, and by adult and pediatric. by adult and pediatric, and, effective for contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2025, by new and returning patients.
(B)Number of allowable exceptions for the appointment time standard, if known, categorized by provider types, including specialists, and by adult and pediatric. by adult and pediatric, and, effective for contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2025, by urgent and nonurgent appointment types and by new and returning patients.
(C)Distance and driving time between the nearest network provider and ZIP Code of the beneficiary furthest from that provider for requests for alternative access standards.
(D)Approximate number of beneficiaries impacted by alternative access standards or allowable exceptions.
(E)Percentage of providers in the plan service area, by provider and specialty type, that are under a contract with a Medi-Cal managed care plan.
(F)The number of requests for alternative access standards approved or denied by ZIP Code and provider and specialty type, and the reasons for the approval or denial of the request for alternative access standards. If an approval is authorized, the reasons for approval shall identify whether the approval was granted for either of the following reasons:
(i)A provider was not located in the requested ZIP Code.
(ii)The Medi-Cal managed care plan was unable to enter into a contract with a provider or providers in the requested ZIP Code.
(G)The process of ensuring out-of-network access.
(H)Descriptions of contracting efforts and explanation for why a contract was not executed.
(I)Timeframe for approval or denial of a request for alternative access standards by the department.
(J)Consumer complaints, if any.
(2)The information described in paragraph (1) shall be presented in a chart format to enable comparison among counties, provider types, and plans.
(c)The EQRO shall develop a methodology to assess information that will help inform the experience of individuals placed in a skilled nursing facility or intermediate care facility and the distance that they are placed from their place of residence. The EQRO shall report the results from the use of this methodology in the EQRO annual Medi-Cal managed care plan technical report.
(d)The department shall comply with the requirements of subsection (c) of Section 438.364 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations in making the information described in this section publicly available.
SEC. 3.Section 14197.7 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is amended to read:14197.7.(a)Notwithstanding any other law, if the director finds that any entity that contracts with the department for the delivery of health care services (contractor), including a Medi-Cal managed care plan or a prepaid health plan, fails to comply with contract requirements, state or federal law or regulations, or the state plan or approved waivers, or for other good cause, the director may terminate the contract or impose sanctions as set forth in this section. Good cause includes, but is not limited to, a finding of deficiency that results in improper denial or delay in the delivery of health care services, potential endangerment to patient care, disruption in the contractors provider network, failure to approve continuity of care, that claims accrued or to accrue have not or will not be recompensed, or a delay in required contractor reporting to the department.
(b)The director may identify findings of noncompliance or good cause through any means, including, but not limited to, findings in audits, investigations, contract compliance reviews, quality improvement system monitoring, routine monitoring, facility site surveys, encounter and provider data submissions, grievances and appeals, network adequacy reviews, assessments of timely access requirements, reviews of utilization data, health plan rating systems, fair hearing decisions, complaints from beneficiaries and other stakeholders, whistleblowers, and contractor self-disclosures.
(c)Except when the director determines that there is an immediate threat to the health of Medi-Cal beneficiaries receiving health care services from the contractor, at the request of the contractor, the department shall hold a public hearing to commence 30 days after notice of intent to terminate the contract has been received by the contractor. The department shall present evidence at the hearing showing good cause for the termination. The department shall assign an administrative law judge who shall provide a written recommendation to the department on the termination of the contract within 30 days after conclusion of the hearing. Reasonable notice of the hearing shall be given to the contractor, Medi-Cal beneficiaries receiving services through the contractor, and other interested parties, including any other persons and organizations as the director may deem necessary. The notice shall state the effective date of, and the reason for, the termination.
(d)(1)In lieu of contract termination, the director shall have the power and authority to require or impose a plan of correction and issue one or more of the following sanctions against a contractor for findings of noncompliance or good cause, including, but not limited to, those specified in subdivision (a):
(1)(A)Temporarily or permanently suspend enrollment and marketing activities.
(2)(B)Require the contractor to suspend or terminate contractor personnel or subcontractors.
(3)(C)Issue one or more of the temporary suspension orders set forth in subdivision (j).
(4)(D)Impose temporary management consistent with the requirements specified in Section 438.706 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
(5)(E)Suspend default enrollment of enrollees who do not select a contractor for the delivery of health care services.
(6)(F)Impose civil monetary sanctions consistent with the dollar amounts and violations specified in Section 438.704 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
(A)(i)A limit of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for each determination of the following:
(i)(I)The contractor fails to provide medically necessary services that the contractor is required to provide, under law or under its contract with the department, to an enrollee covered under the contract.
(ii)(II)The contractor misrepresents or falsifies information to an enrollee, potential enrollee, or health care provider.
(iii)(III)The contractor distributes directly, or indirectly through an agent or independent contractor, marketing materials that have not been approved by the state or that contain false or materially misleading information.
(B)(ii)A limit of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) for each determination of the following:
(i)(I)The contractor conducts any act of discrimination against an enrollee on the basis of their health status or need for health care services. This includes termination of enrollment or refusal to reenroll a beneficiary, except as permitted under the Medicaid program, or any practice that would reasonably be expected to discourage enrollment by beneficiaries whose medical condition or history indicates probable need for substantial future medical services.
(ii)(II)The contractor misrepresents or falsifies information that it furnishes to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services or to the department.
(C)(iii)A limit of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) for each beneficiary the director determines was not enrolled because of a discriminatory practice under clause (i) of subparagraph (B). This sanction is subject to the overall limit of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) under subparagraph (B). clause (ii).
(2)Any plan of correction imposed by the director pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be monitored by the department and progress reported publicly no less than annually for the duration of the plan of correction.
(e)(1)Notwithstanding the monetary sanctions imposed for the violations set forth in paragraph (6) subparagraph (F) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the director may impose monetary sanctions in accordance with this section based on any of the following:
(1)(A)The contractor violates any federal or state statute or regulation.
(2)(B)The contractor violates any provision of its contract with the department.
(3)(C)The contractor violates any provision of the state plan or approved waivers.
(4)(D)The contractor fails to meet quality metrics or benchmarks established by the department. Any changes to the minimum quality metrics or benchmarks made by the department that are effective on or after January 1, 2020, shall be established in advance of the applicable reporting or performance measurement period, unless required by the federal government.
(5)(E)The contractor fails to demonstrate that it has an adequate network to meet anticipated utilization in its service area.
(6)(F)The contractor fails to comply with network adequacy standards, including, but not limited to, time and distance, timely access, and provider-to-beneficiary ratio requirements pursuant to standards and formulae that are set forth in federal or state law, regulation, state plan or contract, and that are posted in advance to the departments internet website.
(7)(G)The contractor fails to comply with the requirements of a corrective action plan.
(8)(H)The contractor fails to submit timely and accurate network provider data.
(9)(I)The director identifies deficiencies in the contractors delivery of health care services.
(10)(J)The director identifies deficiencies in the contractors operations, including the timely payment of claims.
(11)(K)The contractor fails to comply with reporting requirements, including, but not limited to, those set forth in Section 53862 of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations.
(12)(L)The contractor fails to timely and accurately process grievances or appeals.
(2)For purposes of this subdivision, the following definitions apply:
(A)Timely means no less than annually, unless otherwise specified by any other applicable law.
(B)Accurate network provider data includes, but is not limited to, information made available to the plan through the evaluation described in paragraphs (3) and (5) of subdivision (g) of Section 14197 regarding unavailable or unreachable providers.
(f)(1)Monetary sanctions imposed pursuant to subdivision (e) may be separately and independently assessed and may also be assessed for each day the contractor fails to correct an identified deficiency. For a deficiency that impacts beneficiaries, each beneficiary impacted constitutes a separate violation. Monetary sanctions shall be assessed in the following amounts:
(A)Up to twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for a first violation.
(B)Up to fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for a second violation.
(C)Up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) for each subsequent violation.
(2)For monetary sanctions imposed on a contractor that is funded from one or more of the realigned accounts described in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (n), the department shall calculate a percentage of the funds attributable to the contractor to be offset per month pursuant to paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (n) until the amount offset equals the amount of the penalty imposed pursuant to paragraph (1).
(g)When assessing sanctions pursuant to this section, the director shall determine the appropriate amount of the penalty for each violation based upon one or more of the following nonexclusive factors:
(1)The nature, scope, and gravity of the violation, including the potential harm or impact on beneficiaries.
(2)The good or bad faith of the contractor.
(3)The contractors history of violations.
(4)The willfulness of the violation.
(5)The nature and extent to which the contractor cooperated with the departments investigation.
(6)The nature and extent to which the contractor aggravated or mitigated any injury or damage caused by the violation.
(7)The nature and extent to which the contractor has taken corrective action to ensure the violation will not recur.
(8)The financial status of the contractor, including whether the sanction will affect the ability of the contractor to come into compliance.
(9)The financial cost of the health care service that was denied, delayed, or modified.
(10)Whether the violation is an isolated incident.
(11)The amount of the penalty necessary to deter similar violations in the future.
(12)Any other mitigating factors presented by the contractor.
(h)Except in exigent circumstances in which there is an immediate risk to the health of beneficiaries, as determined by the department, the director shall give reasonable written notice to the contractor of the intention to impose any of the sanctions authorized by this section and others who may be directly interested, including any other persons and organizations as the director may deem necessary. The notice shall include the effective date for, the duration of, and the reason for each sanction proposed by the director. A contractor may request the department to meet and confer with the contractor to discuss information and evidence that may impact the directors final decision to impose sanctions authorized by this section. The director shall grant a request to meet and confer prior to issuance of a final sanction if the contractor submits the request in writing to the department no later than two business days after the contractors receipt of the directors notice of intention to impose sanctions.
(i)Notwithstanding subdivision (d), the director shall terminate a contract with a contractor that the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services has determined does not meet the requirements for participation in the Medicaid program contained in Subchapter XIX (commencing with Section 1396) of Chapter 7 of Title 42 of the United States Code.
(j)(1)The department may make one or more of the following temporary suspension orders as an immediate sanction:
(A)Temporarily suspend enrollment activities.
(B)Temporarily suspend marketing activities.
(C)Require the contractor to temporarily suspend specified personnel of the contractor.
(D)Require the contractor to temporarily suspend participation by a specified subcontractor.
(2)The temporary suspension orders shall be effective no earlier than 20 days after the notice specified in subdivision (k).
(k)Prior to issuing a temporary suspension order, or temporarily withholding funds pursuant to subdivision (o), the department shall provide the contractor with a written notice. The notice shall state the departments intent to impose a temporary suspension or temporary withhold, and specify the nature and effective date of the temporary suspension or temporary withhold. The contractor shall have 30 calendar days from the date of receipt of the notice to file a written appeal with the department. Upon receipt of a written appeal filed by the contractor, the department shall within 15 days set the matter for hearing, which shall be held as soon as possible, but not later than 30 days after receipt of the notice of hearing by the contractor. The hearing may be continued at the request of the contractor if a continuance is necessary to permit presentation of an adequate defense. The temporary suspension order shall remain in effect until the hearing is completed and the department has made a final determination on the merits. However, the temporary suspension order shall be deemed vacated if the director fails to make a final determination on the merits within 60 days after the original hearing has been completed. The department shall stay imposition of a temporary withhold, pursuant to subdivision (o), until the hearing is completed and the department has made a final determination on the merits.
(l)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), a contractor may request a hearing in connection with any sanctions applied pursuant to subdivision (d) or (e) within 15 working days after the notice of the effective date of the sanctions has been given, by sending a letter so stating to the address specified in the notice. The department shall stay collection of monetary sanctions upon receipt of the request for a hearing. Collection of the sanction shall remain stayed until the effective date of the final decision of the department.
(2)With respect to mental health plans, the due process and appeals process specified in paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 14718 shall be made available in connection with any contract termination actions, temporary suspension orders, temporary withholds of funds pursuant to subdivision (o), and sanctions applied pursuant to subdivision (d) or (e).
(m)Except as otherwise provided in this section, all hearings to review the imposition of sanctions, including temporary suspension orders, the withholding or offsetting of funds pursuant to subdivision (n), or the temporary withholding of funds pursuant to subdivision (o), shall be held pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 100171 of the Health and Safety Code.
(n)(1)If the director imposes monetary sanctions pursuant to this section on a contractor, except for a contractor described in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, the amount of the sanction may be collected by withholding the amount from capitation or other associated payments owed to the contractor.
(2)If the director imposes monetary sanctions on a contractor that is funded from the Mental Health Subaccount, the Mental Health Equity Subaccount, the Vehicle License Collection Account of the Local Revenue Fund, or the Mental Health Account, the director may offset the monetary sanctions from the respective account. The offset is subject to paragraph (2) of subdivision (q).
(3)If the director imposes monetary sanctions on a contractor that is funded from the Behavioral Health Subaccount of the Local Revenue Fund 2011, the director may offset the monetary sanctions from that account from the distribution attributable to the applicable contractor. The offset is subject to paragraph (2) of subdivision (q).
(4)If the director imposes monetary sanctions on a contractor that is funded from any other mental health or substance use disorder realignment funds from which the Controller is authorized to make distributions to the contractor, the director may offset the monetary sanctions from these funds if the funds described in paragraphs (2) and (3) are insufficient for the purposes described in this subdivision, as appropriate. The offset is subject to paragraph (2) of subdivision (q).
(o)(1)Whenever the department determines that a mental health plan or any entity that contracts with the department to provide Drug Medi-Cal services has violated state or federal law, a requirement of this chapter, Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200), Chapter 8.8 (commencing with Section 14600), or Chapter 8.9 (commencing with Section 14700), or any regulations, the state plan, or a term or condition of an approved waiver, or a provision of its contract with the department, the department may temporarily withhold payments of federal financial participation and payments from the accounts listed in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (n). The department shall temporarily withhold amounts it deems necessary to ensure the mental health plan or the entity that contracts with the department to provide Drug Medi-Cal services promptly corrects the violation. The department shall release the temporarily withheld funds when it determines the mental health plan or the entity that contracts with the department to provide Drug Medi-Cal services has come into compliance.
(2)A mental health plan, or any entity that contracts with the department to provide Drug Medi-Cal services, may appeal the imposition of a temporary withhold pursuant to this subdivision in accordance with the procedures described in subdivisions (k) and (m). Imposition of a temporary withhold shall be stayed until the effective date of the final decision of the department.
(p)This section shall be read in conjunction with, and apply in addition to, any other applicable law that authorizes the department to impose sanctions or otherwise take remedial action upon contractors.
(q)(1)Notwithstanding any other law, nonfederal moneys collected by the department pursuant to this section, except for moneys collected from a contractor funded from one or more of the realigned accounts described in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (n), shall be deposited into the General Fund for use, and upon appropriation by the Legislature, to address workforce issues in the Medi-Cal program and to improve access to care in the Medi-Cal program.
(2)Monetary sanctions imposed via offset on a contractor that is funded from one or more of the realigned accounts described in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (n) shall be redeposited into the account from which the monetary sanctions were offset pursuant to paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (n). The department shall notify the Department of Finance of the percentage reduction for the affected county. The Department of Finance shall subsequently notify the Controller, and the Controller shall redistribute the monetary sanction amount to nonsanctioned counties based on each countys prorated share of the monthly base allocations from the realigned account. With respect to an individual contractor, the department shall not collect via offset more than 25 percent of the total amount of the funds distributed from the applicable account or accounts that are attributable to the contractor in a given month. If the department is not able to collect the full amount of monetary sanctions imposed on a contractor funded from one or more of the realigned accounts described in paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (n) in a given month, the department shall continue to offset the amounts attributable to the contractor in subsequent months until the full amount of monetary sanctions has been collected.
(r)(1)Notwithstanding Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, the department may implement, interpret, or make specific this section, in whole or in part, by means of plan or county letters, information notices, plan or provider bulletins, or other similar instructions, without taking any further regulatory action.
(2)By July 1, 2025, the department shall adopt any regulations necessary to implement this section in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(s)This section shall be implemented only to the extent that any necessary federal approvals have been obtained and that federal financial participation is available.
(t)For purposes of this section, contractor means any individual, organization, or entity that enters into a contract with the department to provide services to enrolled Medi-Cal beneficiaries pursuant to any of the following:
(1)Article 2.7 (commencing with Section 14087.3), including dental managed care programs developed pursuant to Section 14087.46.
(2)Article 2.8 (commencing with Section 14087.5).
(3)Article 2.81 (commencing with Section 14087.96).
(4)Article 2.82 (commencing with Section 14087.98).
(5)Article 2.9 (commencing with Section 14088).
(6)Article 2.91 (commencing with Section 14089).
(7)Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200), including dental managed care plans.
(8)Chapter 8.9 (commencing with Section 14700).
(9)A county Drug Medi-Cal organized delivery system authorized under the California Medi-Cal 2020 Demonstration pursuant to Article 5.5 (commencing with Section 14184) or a successor demonstration or waiver, as applicable.
SECTION 1.It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation relating to mental health.It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation relating to mental health.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| May 16, 2024 | In committee: Held under submission. |
| May 16, 2024 | Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 5215.) |
| May 15, 2024 | In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file. |
| Apr 22, 2024 | Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Apr 18, 2024 | Read second time and amended. |
| Apr 17, 2024 | From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 16). |
| Mar 19, 2024 | Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. |
| Mar 18, 2024 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended. |
| Mar 18, 2024 | Referred to Com. on HEALTH. |
| Feb 14, 2024 | From printer. May be heard in committee March 15. |
| Feb 13, 2024 | Read first time. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2024 | Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Assembly Standing Committee on Health |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| AARP | ** Support | |
| Access Reproductive Justice | ** Support | |
| Alliance for Children's Rights | ** Support | |
| APLA Health | ** Support | |
| California Alliance Of Child And Family Services | * Support | Apr 16, 2024 |
| California Association of Alcohol and Drug Program Executives | * Support | Apr 16, 2024 |
| California Association Of Health Plans | * Against | Apr 16, 2024 |
| California School-Based Health Alliance | ** Support | |
| Children Now | * Support | Apr 16, 2024 |
| Courage California | ** Support | |
| Didi Hirsch Mental Health Services | ** Support | |
| Friends Committee On Legislation Of California | ** Support | |
| Health Access | * Support | Apr 16, 2024 |
| Local Health Plans Of California | * Against | Apr 16, 2024 |
| Mental Health America of California | ** Support | |
| National Center for Youth Law | ** Support | |
| National Health Law Program | ** Support | |
| Placer County | * Support | Apr 16, 2024 |
| Planned Parenthood Affiliates Of California | * Support | Apr 16, 2024 |
| The Children's Partnership | * Support | Apr 16, 2024 |
| The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society | ** Support | |
| Western Center for Law and Poverty | * Support | Apr 16, 2024 |
Date of Hearing: May 15, 2024
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Buffy Wicks, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 2466
Author:(Wendy Carrillo) – As Amended Ver:April 18, 2024
Policy Committee: | Health | Vote: | 13 - 0 |
|
| ||
|
|
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY:
This bill implements recommendations from a state audit related to improving monitoring and oversight of the accuracy of provider networks and timely access to care in Medi-Cal managed care.
Specifically, this bill:
- Specifies standards a Medi-Cal managed care plan must meet to be deemed in compliance with appointment time standards.
- Specifies metrics that must be included in the annual report measuring a plan’s compliance with time or distance and appointment time standards.
- Requires the Department of Health Care Services’ (DHCS) annual reports summarizing evaluation findings and corrective action plans (CAPs) to report information on unavailable or unreachable providers and how each plan will utilize this information to regularly maintain or update its provider directories.
- Provides that a plan’s failure to comply with appointment time standards and reporting requirements may result in contract termination or other sanctions.
- Changes, from at least every three years to annually, the frequency at which a Medi-Cal managed care plan that has been granted an alternative access standard must re-submit a request when it cannot meet the time and distance standards, and requires the request to explain efforts made in the previous 12 months to mitigate or eliminate circumstances that justify the use of an alternative access standard.
- Specifies how data on alternative access standards must be organized for the federally required external quality review organization (EQRO) review of Medi-Cal managed care plans.
- Requires DHCS to monitor any CAP it imposes on a Medi-Cal managed care plan for failure to comply with contract requirements, state or federal law or regulations, or the state plan or approved waivers, or for other good cause, and publicly report progress no less than annually for the duration of the plan of correction.
FISCAL EFFECT:
Ongoing costs of an unknown amount, potentially in the high hundreds of thousands of dollars annually, to DHCS to collect data, review plans’ compliance with accessibility standards, review CAPs, and to prepare data reports (General Fund, federal funds).
COMMENTS:
- Purpose. This bill is sponsored by The Children’s Partnership and National Health Law Program to improve wait times for behavioral health appointments for young people in Medi-Cal. According to the author:
Last fall, a report from the State Auditor showed that California is falling short when it comes to providing timely access to behavioral health appointments for young people on Medi-Cal. That report found a clear need for DHCS to monitor the compliance of health plans with statutory timely access standards to eliminate the long-standing disparities in access and mental health outcomes for the state’s low-income children and youth enrolled in Medi-Cal. This bill makes fixes to improve those metrics, ensuring that California’s most vulnerable young people receive the services they need.
- Background.
State Audits on Children’s Access to Health Care in Medi-Cal. In March 2019, the Bureau of State Audits (auditor) released “Department of Health Care Services - Millions of Children in Medi-Cal Are Not Receiving Preventive Health Services,” regarding DHCS' oversight of the delivery of preventive services to children in Medi-Cal. The auditor found, among other things, that many of the state's children do not have adequate access to Medi-Cal providers who can deliver the required pediatric preventive services. In September 2022, the auditor issued a follow-up audit, “Department of Health Care Services Is Still Not Doing Enough to Ensure That Children in Medi‑Cal Receive Preventive Health Services.” The auditor found DHCS made progress in implementing the 2019 audit's recommendations, but had yet to fully implement some recommendations, including one related to the lack of pediatric providers. The auditor recommended that DHCS identify where more Medi‑Cal providers are needed and request additional funding from the Legislature to increase the number of providers in those identified areas. DHCS indicated it does not plan to implement that recommendation, citing its belief that broader workforce recruitment is beyond its purview.
In response to the 2022 audit recommendation, DHCS indicates it plans to have an external evaluator conduct an access assessment by reviewing the various components of access, comparing managed care plan networks and access to care with commercial and Medicare Advantage markets. Through the assessment, DHCS aims to compare access in Medi-Cal managed care to access for Californians who receive health coverage through the commercial or Medicare Advantage markets. DHCS explains this will allow it to assess if any barriers to access are a reflection of systematic problems across the entire health care system, such as issues related to workforce pipeline, or if access barriers are specific to Medi-Cal. In addition, the assessment will track different levels of access to help determine whether issues exist at the managed care level (network adequacy), provider level (scheduling practices, responsiveness to member scheduling requests, etc.) or both. DHCS indicates it will share the results of the assessment with the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in March 2026.
2023 Audit on Children’s Access to Behavioral Health Care in Medi-Cal. In November 2023, the auditor issued an audit related to children’s access to behavioral health care in Medi-Cal. The auditor found many Medi-Cal managed care plans are unable to provide children with timely access to behavioral health care, as well as weaknesses in the way DHCS and the Department of Managed Health Care measure timely access. The auditor recommended different ways to monitor compliance, and recommended, among other things, that DHCS revise its agreements with managed care plans to require them to demonstrate efforts to recruit new providers to underserved areas and to implement a policy outlining when noncompliance with standards justifies financial penalties. DHCS acknowledged and agreed with many of the recommendations and is in the process of researching feasibility and incorporating the recommendations into new and ongoing measurement and compliance monitoring activities over the next couple of years.
- Policy Concern. As noted in the Assembly Health Committee analysis of this bill, there is already significant work ongoing to improve processes in response to the audit. Final federal regulations expected out this year that address some of these issues may also require the author to respond quickly to conform as needed. The opposition also raises reasonable issues that are worth further consideration, for instance, the importance of consistency across Medi-Cal and commercial delivery systems. The author may wish to continue engaging with DHCS and stakeholders, including the opposition, to mitigate these concerns while establishing a firm statutory foundation for improving oversight of access to care for Medi-Cal beneficiaries.
- Related Legislation. AB 1202 (Lackey) would have required DHCS to prepare a public report including information on each Medi-Cal managed care plan's network adequacy of pediatric primary care and DHCS' efforts to improve access. AB 1202 was vetoed by Governor Newsom, who cited concerns the reporting was duplicative with current and pending DHCS efforts.
- Prior Legislation.
- SB 184 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review), Chapter 47, Statutes of 2022, extends from January 1, 2023, to January 1, 2026, time, distance, and appointment time standards for specified services to ensure that Medi-Cal managed care covered services are available and accessible to enrollees of Medi-Cal managed care plans in a timely manner, and authorizes DHCS to allow a Medi-Cal managed care plan to use video synchronous interaction as a means of demonstrating compliance with time or distance standards and as part of an alternative access standard request. SB 184 changes the frequency of alternative access standards request submissions when a plan cannot meet the time and distance standards, and requires the plan to close out any corrective action plan deficiencies in a timely manner to ensure beneficiary access is adequate and to continually work to improve access in its provider network.
- AB 1642 (Wood), Chapter 465, Statutes of 2019, increases the maximum civil penalty amounts in existing law for Medi-Cal managed care plans, broadens the bases for DHCS to levy sanctions against plans, and broadens DHCS authority to find noncompliance beyond medical audits. AB 1642 further requires plans seeking exceptions from appointment travel time standards to include a description of how the plan intends to arrange for beneficiaries to access covered services if the health care provider is located outside of the time and distance standards.
- AB 205 (Wood), Chapter 738, Statutes of 2018, implements federal rules establishing network adequacy requirements for Medi-Cal managed care plans.
Analysis Prepared by: Allegra Kim / APPR. / (916) 319-2081
Date of Hearing: April 16, 2024
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HEALTH
Mia Bonta, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 2466
Author:(Wendy Carrillo) – As Amended Ver:March 18, 2024
SUBJECT: Medi-Cal managed care: network adequacy standards.
SUMMARY: Implements a number of recommendations from a state audit related to improving monitoring and oversight of the accuracy of provider networks and timely access to care in Medi-Cal managed care. Specifically, this bill:
- Deems a Medi-Cal managed care plan out of compliance with appointment time standards if either:
- Fewer than 85% of the network providers, pursuant to new evaluation standards imposed by this bill, for a specific network had a non-urgent or urgent appointment available within the appointment time standards; or,
- The Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) receives information establishing that the Medi-Cal managed care plan was unable to deliver timely, available, or accessible health care services to enrollees. Authorizes DHCS to consider any of the following factors in evaluating whether each instance identified is part of a pattern of noncompliance that is reasonably related:
- Each instance is a violation of the same appointment time standard;
- Each instance involves the same network;
- Each instance involves the same provider group or subcontracted plan;
- Each instance involves the same provider type;
- Each instance involves the same network provider;
- Each instance occurs in the same region;
- The number of enrollees in the Medi-Cal managed care plan’s network and the total number of instances identified as part of a pattern;
- Whether each instance occurred within the same 12-month period; or,
- Whether each instance involves the same category of health care services.
- Requires, effective for contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2025:
- The annual report measuring plan compliance with the time or distance and appointment time standards to measure all of the following:
- Compliance separately for new and returning patients;
- Compliance with a 48-hour urgent care standard for behavioral health appointments; and,
- Compliance with access standards for new and returning patients.
- Annual evaluations by DHCS measuring plan compliance with the time or distance and appointment time standards to be performed using a direct testing method, which may include, but need not be limited to, a “secret shopper” method, and requires, similar to a) above, compliance for both new and follow-up appointments as well as using a 48-hour urgent care standard. Requires the evaluation to also utilize a method for accounting for and reporting the number of providers who are unavailable or unreachable for purposes of the evaluation.
- DHCS’s annual reports summarizing evaluation findings and corrective action plans (CAPs) to report information on unavailable or unreachable providers and how each plan will utilize this information to regularly maintain or update its provider directories.
- The annual report measuring plan compliance with the time or distance and appointment time standards to measure all of the following:
- Specifies failure to comply with 1) or 2) above can result in contract termination or the issuance of sanctions pursuant to existing law.
- Changes, from at least every three years to annually, the frequency of alternative access standards request submissions made by Medi-Cal managed care plans when they cannot meet the time and distance standards. Requires the request to explain efforts made in the previous 12 months to mitigate or eliminate circumstances that justify the use of an alternative access standard, including documentation of efforts to recruit new providers into its network. Requires DHCS to consider the reasonableness and effectiveness of the mitigating efforts as part of the renewal decision.
- Requires, effective for contract periods commencing on or after July 1, 2025, as part of the federally required external quality review organization (EQRO) review of Medi-Cal managed care plans, the following data to be categorized, in addition to the categories established in current law, as follows:
- The number of requests for alternative access standards in the plan service area for time and distance, to be categorized by new and returning patients; and,
- Number of allowable exceptions for the appointment time standard, if known, to be categorized by urgent and non-urgent appointment types and by new and returning patients.
- Requires any CAP imposed on a Medi-Cal managed care plan by DHCS for failure to comply with contract requirements, state or federal law or regulations, or the state plan or approved waivers, or for other good cause, to be monitored by DHCS and progress reported publicly no less than annually for the duration of the plan of correction.
- Defines the terms “timely” and “accurate network provider data,” for purposes of a compliance evaluation of provider data, such that the submission of such data must occur no less than annually and must include information related to unavailable or unreachable providers.
EXISTING LAW:
- Requires a Medi-Cal managed care plan to maintain a network of providers that are located within specified time and distance standards for specified services. [Welfare and Institutions Code (WIC) §14197 (b)]
- Establishes time or distance standards for primary care (adult and pediatric), dental services, and obstetrics and gynecology, as 10 miles or 30 minutes from the beneficiary’s place of residence; a standard for hospitals that is 15 miles or 30 minutes from the beneficiary’s place of residence; and other standards for specialists (adult and pediatric), pharmacy services, outpatient mental health and substance use disorder services, and opioid treatment programs. [WIC §14197(b)(1)]
- Requires Medi-Cal managed care plans to comply with appointment availability standards developed under the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 (Knox-Keene Act) and its regulations. [WIC §14197(d)(1)(A)]
- Allows, if a Medi-Cal managed care plan cannot meet the time and distance standards set forth in statute, the plan to submit to DHCS a request for alternative access standards, in the form and manner specified by DHCS. [WIC §14197(f)(3)]
- Allows DHCS, upon request of a Medi-Cal managed care plan, to authorize alternative access standards for the established time or distance standards if either of the following occur:
- The requesting Medi-Cal managed care plan has exhausted all other reasonable options to obtain providers to meet the applicable standard; or,
- DHCS determines that the requesting Medi-Cal managed care plan has demonstrated that its delivery structure is capable of delivering the appropriate level of care and access. [WIC §14197(f)(2)]
- Allows DHCS to authorize a Medi-Cal managed care plan to use clinically appropriate synchronous video telehealth as a means of demonstrating compliance with time or distance standards. [WIC §14197(e)]
- Requires the plan to close out any CAP deficiencies in a timely manner to ensure beneficiary access is adequate and to continually work to improve access in its provider network. [WIC §14197(f)(3)(D)]
- Requires measurement of compliance with time or distance and appointment time standards separately for adult and pediatric services for primary care, behavioral health, and core specialist services. [WIC §14197(g)(1)]
- Sunsets the time and distance and appointment availability standards on January 1, 2026. [WIC §14197(l)]
- Requires an EQRO review of Medi-Cal managed care plans annually and requires the EQRO to compile specified data, for the purpose of informing the status of implementation of the time, distance, and appointment time requirements. [WIC §14197.05; 42 Code of Federal Regulations §438.364]
- Grants the Director of DHCS the power and authority to take one or more of the following actions against a Medi-Cal managed care plan for specified findings of noncompliance, including with time, distance, appointment time, provider network adequacy, and a number of related standards:
- Suspend enrollment and marketing activities;
- Impose a CAP;
- Require the contractor to suspend or terminate contractor personnel or subcontractors;
- Impose civil penalties in various amounts up to $100,000 ;
- Impose monetary sanctions of up to $25,000 for a first violation, $50,000 for a second violation, and up to $100,000 for each subsequent violation; or,
- Various other actions. [WIC §14197.7 (d), (e), (f)]
- Requires, by July 1, 2025, DHCS to adopt any regulations necessary to implement penalties and sanctions. [WIC §14197.7 (r)(2)]
- Establishes the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) to regulate health plans under the Knox-Keene Act. [HSC §1340, et seq.]
- Requires a Knox Keene Act-licensed health plan that provides or arranges for the provision of hospital or physician services, including a specialized mental health plan that provides physician or hospital services, or that provides mental health services pursuant to a contract with a full service plan, to comply with specified timely access requirements. [HSC §1367.03]
- Requires DMHC to develop and adopt regulations to ensure that enrollees have access to health care services in a timely manner, regarding:
- Waiting times for appointments, including primary and specialty care physicians;
- Care in an episode of illness, including timeliness of referrals and obtaining other services, as needed; and,
- Waiting time to speak to a physician, registered nurse, or other qualified health professional trained to screen or triage. [HSC §1367.03]
- Requires, in developing these standards, DMHC to consider the clinical appropriateness, the nature of the specialty, the urgency or care, and the requirements of law governing utilization review. [HSC §1367.03]
- Authorizes regulations to be issued by DMHC related to timely access to care. [Title 28 of the California Code of Regulations, including Sections 1300.67.2, 1300.67.2.2, 1300.68, and 1300.70.]
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown. This bill has not yet been analyzed by a fiscal committee.
COMMENTS:
- PURPOSE OF THIS BILL. According to the author, last fall, a report from the State Auditor showed that California is falling short when it comes to providing timely access to behavioral health appointments for young people on Medi-Cal. The author argues the report found a clear need for DHCS to monitor the compliance of health plans with statutory timely access standards to eliminate the long-standing disparities in access and mental health outcomes for the state’s low-income children and youth enrolled in Medi-Cal. The author concludes this bill makes fixes to improve those metrics, ensuring that California’s most vulnerable young people receive the services they need. This bill is sponsored by The Children’s Partnership (TCP) & National Health Law Program (NHeLP) to improve managed care plan accountability with an overall goal of shorter wait times for behavioral health appointments for young people in Medi-Cal.
- BACKGROUND.
- Managed Care. According to the Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program Payment and Access Commission (MacPAC), a federal entity that tracks and advises on Medicaid policy, managed care is the primary Medicaid delivery system in more than half the states. States have incorporated managed care into their Medicaid programs for a number of reasons, including more control and predictability over future costs, opportunities for improved care management, and greater ability to institute accountability and systematic monitoring of performance, access, and quality. However, given managed care plans are paid on a capitated basis (an agreed-upon amount per-member, per-month), it is important for payers to also monitor plans and hold them accountable to ensure plan members are able to access recommended and needed care. As the federal government has allowed states more flexibility to expand managed care in their Medicaid programs, it has concurrently implemented more monitoring and accountability requirements.
- Network Adequacy Standards. Accordingly, in 2016, the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) adopted a major new regulation requiring states to develop and enforce network adequacy standards, including time and distance standards for different provider types. California already had standards in place for Knox-Keene Act-licensed plans. To implement the required changes, the Legislature established network adequacy requirements for Medi-Cal managed care plans (including Denti-Cal plans), county mental health plans that provide specialty mental health services, and county Drug Medi-Cal-Organized Delivery System (DMC-ODS) plans, through AB 205 (Wood), Chapter 738, Statutes of 2018.
AB 205 established maximum time and distance standards for specialists, based on the county population density. For example, plans have to maintain a network of specialists who are up to 15 miles or 30 minutes from the beneficiary’s place of residence in nine major urban counties (such as Alameda, Los Angeles, and San Francisco), but can have a standard that is up to 60 miles or 90 minutes from the beneficiary’s place of residence for 13 rural counties (such as Alpine, Colusa, and, Trinity), as shown in the chart below:
Time and Distance Standards in AB 205 for Specialists and Outpatient Mental Health
Category | Population Density | # of Counties | Counties | Standard |
Rural | < 50 people per square mile | 21 | Alpine, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, Glenn, Humboldt, Imperial, Inyo, Lassen, Mariposa, Mendocino, Modoc, Mono, Plumas, San Benito, Shasta, Sierra , Siskiyou, Tehama, Tuolumne, Trinity | 60 miles/90 minutes |
Small | 51 to 200 people per square mile | 19 | Amador, Butte, El Dorado, Fresno, Kern, Kings, Lake, Madera, Merced, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, San Bernardino, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Sutter, Tulare, Yolo, Yuba | 45 miles/75 minutes |
Medium | 201 to 600 people per square mile | 9 | Marin, Placer, Riverside, San Joaquin, Santa Cruz, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, Ventura | 30 miles/60 minutes |
Dense | ≥ 600 people per square mile | 9 | Alameda, Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Orange, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara | 15 miles/30 minutes |
AB 205 also required plans to make available appointments within specified timeframes for physicians, with different timeframes depending upon whether the visit is urgent and whether the visit is with a specialist, using the current Knox-Keene Act standards for physicians and mental health providers. Prior to AB 205, these standards did not apply to county mental health plans or DMC-ODS plans. Those standards are as follows:
Urgent Appointments | Time |
For services that do not need prior approval | 48 hours |
For services that do need prior approval | 96 hours |
Non-urgent appointments | Wait Time |
Primary care appointment | 10 business days |
Specialist appointment | 15 business days |
Appointment with a non-MD mental health provider | 10 business days |
Appointment for a services to diagnose/treat a health conditions | 15 business days |
Pursuant to All-Plan Letter 23-001, if a plan is able to cover at least 85% of the members in a ZIP code and they can show that they have additional capacity through the use of telehealth providers to serve the remaining members, the plan would be deemed compliant with time or distance standards and no alternative access request is required.
Medi-Cal managed care plans, as well as private health plans licensed by the Knox-Keene Act, are also required to ensure must also ensure provider capacity through reporting on provider-enrollee ratios, such that health plan networks have enough of each of the right types of providers to deliver the volume of services needed. For example, plan networks must include one primary care provider for every 2,000 beneficiaries.
- Alternative Access Requests. DHCS can allow, upon request by a Medi-Cal managed care plan, “alternative access requests” from the time and distance standards if:
- The requesting plan has exhausted all other reasonable options to obtain providers to meet the applicable standard; or,
- DHCS determines that the requesting plan has demonstrated that its delivery structure is capable of delivering the appropriate level of care and access.
- Alternative Access Requests. DHCS can allow, upon request by a Medi-Cal managed care plan, “alternative access requests” from the time and distance standards if:
Plan requests for alternative access standards are typically likely based one or more of the following:
- The lack of providers in an area (such as in rural parts of the state);
- Specialists providers for complex cases where beneficiaries would need to travel to because of the expertise of the particular provider (for example, children’s hospitals, university teaching hospitals and cancer centers); or,
- Providers who are within a plan’s area but who do not contract with Medi-Cal plans, typically because of plan rates paid to providers, plan contract terms, or an unwillingness to participate in Medi-Cal.
- Monitoring. According to MacPAC, federal law establishes two direct oversight and monitoring requirements for Medicaid programs: States must develop, implement and update a managed care quality strategy that includes access standards and procedures for monitoring and evaluating the quality and appropriateness of care and services, meets the standards set by CMS, and is subject to monitoring by CMS; and states must conduct an annual external independent review of the quality of and access to services under each managed care contract.
As part of implementation of the 2016 regulations, DHCS created a monitoring plan to monitor compliance with contractual requirements that includes a number of different methods. DHCS explains that, for example, for plans, DHCS will conduct a telephonic timely access survey through its EQRO. DHCS will provide the EQRO with provider network data and the EQRO will randomly select a statistically significant sample of providers, by plan operating area, to survey wait times for beneficiaries to next appointment. These surveys will be conducted quarterly. DHCS also notes the following:
- DHCS conducts compliance audits and reviews of plans both annually and triannually, depending on plan type, to determine the plans’ compliance with state and federal requirements, including, but not limited to: network adequacy, provider monitoring, provider directories, and access standards;
- In order to ensure network adequacy standards are meaningful, DHCS will hold plans to the standards and enforce corrective action if they fail to meet them;
- DHCS has established processes to work with the plans on monitoring and oversight issues. If DHCS identifies that a plan is struggling to meet network adequacy requirements, DHCS will provide technical assistance to the plan. When necessary, a CAP may be imposed. Moreover, if a plan does not come into compliance with the CAP, DHCS may impose a financial penalty or sanction;
- DHCS continually seeks improvement in its monitoring program to further drive quality, such as improving the provider network data collected;
- DHCS will review provider network directories on a monthly basis as required by the federal regulation; and,
- Starting with the 2022 contract year, CMS requested DHCS submit an Annual Network Certification for each contracting managed care plan, including Medi-Cal managed care plans and county-administered specialty mental health service plans.
Finally, CMS is in the process of updating its regulations on access to care monitoring, and released a notice of proposed rulemaking last spring. These pending federal rules may require a “secret shopper” approach for appointment time surveys and a 90% compliance threshold for the percentage of appointments that meet timely access standards.
- Enforcement. DHCS has increased oversight and expectations on managed care plans and has stepped up enforcement in recent years. Assembly Bill 1642 (Wood), Chapter 465, Statues of 2019, provides DHCS with the authority to increase monetary sanctions for various types of violations, including, among other things, violations of contract provisions, failure to demonstrate network adequacy, and failure to meet certain performance levels. In 2022, DHCS sanctioned 11 plans. On February 14, 2023, DHCS issued sanction notices to another 11 plans and on December 22, 2023, DHCS announced sanctions on 22 plans due to poor performance on quality and required immediate action. DHCS notes more than half of plans fell below Minimum Performance Levels (MPL) for immunization rates, well-infant and well-child visits, breast cancer screenings, and cervical cancer screenings, leaving significant room for improvement in children’s and women’s preventive services. Sanctions ranged from $25,000 to $437,000 based on various factors, including how many Medi-Cal members were impacted, the degree to which a plan fell below MPL, and the degree of improvement or decline from the previous measurement year. LA Care, a large plan, was sanctioned $890,000 in 2022. Plans were also required to take specified actions to improve quality.
- Enforcement. DHCS has increased oversight and expectations on managed care plans and has stepped up enforcement in recent years. Assembly Bill 1642 (Wood), Chapter 465, Statues of 2019, provides DHCS with the authority to increase monetary sanctions for various types of violations, including, among other things, violations of contract provisions, failure to demonstrate network adequacy, and failure to meet certain performance levels. In 2022, DHCS sanctioned 11 plans. On February 14, 2023, DHCS issued sanction notices to another 11 plans and on December 22, 2023, DHCS announced sanctions on 22 plans due to poor performance on quality and required immediate action. DHCS notes more than half of plans fell below Minimum Performance Levels (MPL) for immunization rates, well-infant and well-child visits, breast cancer screenings, and cervical cancer screenings, leaving significant room for improvement in children’s and women’s preventive services. Sanctions ranged from $25,000 to $437,000 based on various factors, including how many Medi-Cal members were impacted, the degree to which a plan fell below MPL, and the degree of improvement or decline from the previous measurement year. LA Care, a large plan, was sanctioned $890,000 in 2022. Plans were also required to take specified actions to improve quality.
Although state law authorizes DHCS to levy sanctions for noncompliance with network adequacy standards, the sanctions discussed above were largely related to plans’ inability to meet quality performance benchmarks, not failures to demonstrate network adequacy.
- State Audits on Children’s Access to Health Care in Medi-Cal. In March 2019, the Bureau of State Audits (auditor) released an audit entitled “Department of Health Care Services - Millions of Children in Medi-Cal Are Not Receiving Preventive Health Services,” regarding DHCS' oversight of the delivery of preventive services to children in Medi-Cal. The auditor found, among other things, that many of the state's children do not have adequate access to Medi-Cal providers who can deliver the required pediatric preventive services. On September 3, 2022, the auditor issued a follow-up audit to the original 2019 audit, titled “Department of Health Care Services Is Still Not Doing Enough to Ensure That Children in Medi‑Cal Receive Preventive Health Services.” The auditor found DHCS made progress in implementing the 2019 audit's recommendations, but it had yet to fully implement some recommendations, including one related to the lack of pediatric providers. Specifically, the auditor recommended that DHCS identify where more Medi‑Cal providers are needed and request additional funding from the Legislature to increase the number of providers in those identified areas. DHCS indicated it does not plan to implement that recommendation, citing its belief that broader workforce recruitment is beyond DHCS' purview.
In its response to the 2022 audit recommendation DHCS indicates it plans to have an external evaluator conduct an access assessment by reviewing the various components of access, comparing managed care plan networks and access to care with commercial and Medicare Advantage markets. Through the assessment, DHCS aims to compare access in Medi-Cal managed care to access for Californians who receive health coverage through the commercial or Medicare Advantage markets. DHCS explains this will allow it to assess if any barriers to access are a reflection of systematic problems across the entire health care system, such as issues related to workforce pipeline, or if access barriers are specific to Medi-Cal. In addition, the assessment will track different levels of access to help determine whether issues exist at the managed care level (network adequacy), provider level (scheduling practices, responsiveness to member scheduling requests, etc.) or both. DHCS indicates the results of the assessment will be shared with CMS in March 2026.
- 2023 Audit on Children’s Access to Behavioral Health in Medi-Cal. In November 2023, the auditor issued another audit, this time related to children’s access to behavioral health care in Medi-Cal. The auditor found many Medi-Cal managed care plans are unable to provide children with timely access to behavioral health care, as well as weaknesses in the way DHCS and DMHC measure timely access. The auditor recommended different ways to monitor compliance, and recommended, among other things, that DHCS revise its agreements with managed care plans to require them to demonstrate efforts to recruit new providers to underserved areas and to implement a policy outlining when noncompliance with standards justifies financial penalties. DHCS acknowledged and agreed with many of the recommendations and is in process of researching feasibility and incorporating the recommendations into new and ongoing measurement and compliance monitoring activities over the next couple of years. Specific audit recommendations, and their relationship to provisions of this bill, are discussed below.
- How This Bill Addresses Specific Audit Recommendations.
- Data on appointment times; compliance thresholds. The auditor recommends DHCS set a compliance threshold for the percentage of appointments that meet timely access standards. This bill sets such a standard, at 85%. It also specifies factors DHCS should consider in establishing a pattern of noncompliance.
- Methodological issues in surveys and thresholds. The auditor pointed out a number of methodological limitations in the state’s measurement of appointment times, including the following related to timely access surveys:
- Surveys were measuring compliance with a 96-hour standard, not the 48-hour standard that applies for services that do not need prior approval pursuant to state law.
- Survey data may have been biased by the surveyor transparently telling the provider the reason for the call, versus collecting data through a “secret shopper” oversight approach;
- Non-responsive providers were excluded from data reporting and the reporting was not qualified or adjusted to account for this exclusion, which likely gave the wrong impression about provider availability, because a significant proportion of providers were non-responsive; and,
- Surveys do not differentiate between appointment times for new versus existing patients, which may be significantly longer, nor did they differentiate between adult versus pediatric.
This bill requires the measurement of compliance separately for new and returning patients and compliance with a 48-hour urgent care standard for behavioral health appointment. It also requires annual evaluations by DHCS evaluating plan compliance with the time or distance and appointment time standards to be performed using a direct testing method, which may include, but need not be limited to, a “secret shopper” method. Finally, it requires DHCS to utilize a method for accounting for and reporting the number of providers who are unavailable or unreachable for purposes of the evaluation.
- Oversight of CAPs. The auditor recommended DHCS should demonstrate that it has followed up with county mental health plans and Drug Medi-Cal programs on CAPs that continue to be deficient in timely access or other network adequacy standards. This bill requires any plan of correction to be monitored by DHCS and progress reported publicly no less than annually for the duration of the plan of correction.
- Provider capacity. The auditor recommended DHCS should develop a new methodology for calculating non-specialty outpatient behavioral health provider-to-member ratios, as well as other recommendations related to improving the accuracy of how providers are counted as contributing to the adequacy of a provider network. These are not specifically addressed by the bill. DHCS has indicated that it is addressing this recommendation administratively.
The auditor also recommended DHCS should revise its agreements with plans that do not meet time and distance standards to require them to demonstrate efforts to recruit new providers to underserved areas. This bill requires, as part of DHCS’s approval of requests for alternative access standards, requests to be made annually and requires plans to explain efforts made in the previous 12 months to mitigate or eliminate circumstances that justify the use of an alternative access standard, including documentation of efforts to recruit new providers into its network. It also requires DHCS to consider the reasonableness and effectiveness of the mitigating efforts as part of its decision to renew the standard.
- Enforcement. The auditor recommends DHCS develop and implement a policy outlining when noncompliance with network adequacy standards by a Medi-Cal managed care plan, county mental health plan, or county Drug Medi-Cal program justifies financial penalties. This bill reinforces that DHCS can assess sanctions for noncompliance with various standards and lays out factors DHCS should consider in assessing financial penalties.
- SUPPORT. A large coalition of children’s, health, health consumer, behavioral health and legal advocates and providers support this bill. The California Alliance of Child and Family Services writes in support that legislative changes would ensure that Medi-Cal managed care plans are held accountable for taking actionable efforts to recruit new providers and deploy mitigation strategies to meet timely access standards for behavioral health appointments, particularly those with an urgent need. Cosponsors NHeLP and TCP write they are cosponsoring this bill to implement strategies that better ensure compliance with existing timely access standards and provide greater accountability for Medi-Cal managed care and county behavioral health plans not meeting those standards, especially for children and youth accessing Medi-Cal covered behavioral health care.
- OPPOSITION. California Association of Health Plans (CAHP) and Local Health Plans of California (LHPC) oppose this bill on similar grounds. LHPC writes that while they appreciate the bill’s intent, they believe it will undermine processes underway by DHCS to address many of the same concerns that the bill attempts to confront and that it may not align with existing standards. LHPC notes DHCS outlined, in their audit response, several planned or active actions that they are taking to address the findings and recommendations within the report, including analyzing the feasibility of including a “secret shopper” approach within timely access surveys and identifying the steps necessary to operationalize changes to the survey approach, as well as including implementation of monitoring for new and existing patients. Additionally, in their response DHCS acknowledges that they have already begun to explore in partnership with the DMHC compliance thresholds that align across managed care delivery systems.
CAHP and LHPC share their concern about the provision in the bill increasing the appointment time threshold to 85%. CAHP explains that currently, managed care plans are required to meet a threshold of 70%, although many of Med-Cal managed care plans are currently exceeding that threshold. However, CAHP points out, establishing a base compliance rate of 85% will be very problematic for plans operating in rural and underserved communities. Rural and underserved areas of the state already lack the available workforce needed to serve the needs of these communities. For example, CAHP notes, providers in many of these communities are only in the office/clinic/hospital once or twice a week. This creates inherent difficulties scheduling members with those providers within the existing timeframes. CAHP respectfully requests this provision be amended to align with the DMHC compliance thresholds to create consistency across delivery systems.
LHPC points out that the frequency in which Medi-Cal managed care plans are required to submit renewals for previously approved Alternative Access Standard (AAS) requests was modified in statute in 2022 from annually to every three years. LHPC explains this change acknowledges that large changes in provider availability across the state are unlikely to occur within one years’ time, and a triennial process was more appropriate to revisit changes in provider availability and therefore the need for an AAS. LHPC states the reversion back to annual submission creates an unnecessary administrative burden on Medi-Cal managed care plans and DHCS. LHPC argues local plans are committed to developing, recruiting, and retaining providers into network, demonstrated through many local plans’ community investment activities; however, these efforts take time and considerable resources. LHPC states allowing plans to submit AAS request renewals every three years will allow local plans the time and focus necessary to strengthen network capacity.
LHPC and CAHP conclude that the bill may be premature, and that it may circumvent the work being done on these issues.
- RELATED LEGISLATION.
- AB 2340 (Bonta) requires DHCS to take specified actions in DHCS’s implementation of federal regulations requiring states to share informational materials about early and periodic screening, diagnostic, and services with Medicaid beneficiaries under 21 years of age. AB 2340 is pending in the Assembly Health Committee.
- AB 236 (Holden) requires health plans and insurers to annually audit and delete inaccurate provider listings, and subjects a health plan or insurer to administrative penalties if it fails to meet prescribed benchmarks for accuracy, as specified. AB 236 is pending referral in the Senate.
- PREVIOUS LEGISLATION.
- AB 1202 (Lackey) of 2023 would have required DHCS to prepare a public report including information on each Medi-Cal managed care plan's network adequacy of pediatric primary care, data on beneficiaries, and reporting on DHCS' efforts to improve access. AB 1202 was vetoed by Governor Newsom on concerns the reporting was duplicative with current and pending DHCS efforts.
- SB 184 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review), Chapter 47, Statutes of 2022, extends from January 1, 2023, to January 1, 2026, time, distance, and appointment time standards for specified services to ensure that Medi-Cal managed care covered services are available and accessible to enrollees of Medi-Cal managed care plans in a timely manner. Authorizes DHCS to allow a Medi-Cal managed care plan to use clinically appropriate video synchronous interaction as a means of demonstrating compliance with the time or distance standards, and as part of an alternative access standard request, and authorizes DHCS to develop policies for granting credit, as specified. Makes changes to the frequency of alternative access standards request submissions made by Medi-Cal managed care plans when they cannot meet the time and distance standards, and requires the plan to close out any corrective action plan deficiencies in a timely manner to ensure beneficiary access is adequate and to continually work to improve access in its provider network.
- AB 1642 increases the maximum civil penalty amounts in existing law for Medi-Cal managed care plans. Broadens the bases for the DHCS to levy sanctions against plans, and broadens DHCS authority to find noncompliance beyond medical audits. Includes county mental health plans and Drug Medi-Cal organized delivery system in the plan penalty provisions. Requires penalty revenue to be deposited into the General Fund for use, and upon appropriation by the Legislature, to address workforce issues in the Medi-Cal program and to improve access to care in the Medi-Cal program. Requires plans seeking exceptions from appointment travel time standards to include a description of how the plan intends to arrange for beneficiaries to access covered services if the health care provider is located outside of the time and distance standards. Requires DHCS to evaluate and determine whether the resulting time and distance is reasonable to expect a beneficiary to travel to receive care.
- AB 205 implements federal rules establishing network adequacy requirements for Medi-Cal managed care plans.
- POLICY COMMENTS. With the transition of the overwhelming majority of the Medi-Cal population to managed care and evidence of poor utilization of services and access to care issues in Medi-Cal, it is critical the state implement robust monitoring, oversight, and, where necessary, enforcement. The auditor’s recent report raised numerous issues and questions about the state’s ability to accurately monitor and oversee compliance with time and distance and appointment time requirements, with negative results for beneficiaries who have difficulty getting timely access to care despite plans showing they meet standards “on paper,” This bill addresses many of the audit’s important and reasonable recommendations. However, the author may encounter challenges balancing the timing and content of changes through legislation with the significant work ongoing administratively to improve processes in response to the audit. Final federal regulations expected out this year that address some of these issues may also require the author to respond quickly to conform as needed. The opposition also raises reasonable issues that are worth further consideration, for instance, the importance of consistency across Medi-Cal and commercial delivery systems. The author may wish to continue engaging with DHCS and stakeholders, including the opposition, to mitigate these issues while establishing a firm statutory foundation for improving oversight of access to care for Medi-Cal beneficiaries.
- TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS. The Committee has, in discussion with the author and sponsor, identified minor amendments to correct and clarify code references to align with the author’s intent:
- In Section 14197.7, subdivision (e): apply the definitions of “timely” and “accurate network provider data” only to the failure to submit timely and accurate network provider data, not to all the provisions of subdivision (e).
- In Section 14197, subdivision (g): Correct a reference within the paragraph that creates a report that measures compliance for new and returning patients and a 48-hour urgent care standard. This report should relate to the plan’s compliance with the time or distance and appointment time standards, not compliance with health care services from a health care provider or a facility located outside of the time or distance standards. In addition, the bill includes two requirements to measure compliance for new and returning patients. Amendments will correct this by removing one of the duplicative requirements.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
AARP
Access Reproductive Justice
Alliance for Children's Rights
APLA Health
California Alliance of Child and Family Services
California School-based Health Alliance
Children Now
Courage California
Didi Hirsch Mental Health Services
Friends Committee on Legislation of California
Mental Health America of California
National Center for Youth Law
National Health Law Program
The Children's Partnership
The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society
Western Center on Law & Poverty, Inc.
Opposition
California Association of Health Plans
Local Health Plans of California
Analysis Prepared by: Lisa Murawski / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):