AB 2563: Newborn screening program.
- Session Year: 2023-2024
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2024-02-14
Current Status:
Failed
(2024-05-16: In committee: Held under submission.)
Introduced
In Committee
First Chamber
In Committee
Second Chamber
Enacted
Existing law requires the State Department of Public Health to establish a program for the development, provision, and evaluation of genetic disease testing. Existing law establishes the continuously appropriated Genetic Disease Testing Fund (GDTF), consisting of fees paid for newborn screening tests, and states the intent of the Legislature that all costs of the genetic disease testing program be fully supported by fees paid for newborn screening tests, which are deposited in the GDTF. Existing law also authorizes moneys in the GDTF to be used for the expansion of the Genetic Disease Branch Screening Information System to include cystic fibrosis, biotinidase, severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), and adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) and exempts the expansion of contracts for this purpose from certain provisions of the Public Contract Code, the Government Code, and the State Administrative Manual, as specified.
This bill would require the department to expand statewide screening of newborns to include screening for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. By expanding the purposes for which moneys from the fund may be expended, this bill would make an appropriation.
(a)It is the intent of the Legislature that, unless otherwise specified, the genetic disease testing program carried out pursuant to this chapter be fully supported from fees collected for services provided by the program.
(b)(1)The department shall charge a fee to all payers for any tests or activities test or activity performed pursuant to this chapter. The amount of the fee shall be established by regulation and periodically adjusted by the director in order to meet the costs of this chapter. Notwithstanding any other law, any fees fee charged for prenatal screening and followup services provided to persons a person enrolled in the Medi-Cal program, health care service plan enrollees, enrollee, or persons person covered by a health insurance policies, policy shall be paid in full and deposited in the Genetic Disease Testing Fund or the Birth Defects Monitoring Program Fund consistent with this section.
(2)The department shall expeditiously undertake all steps necessary to implement the fee collection process, including personnel, contracts, and data processing, so as to initiate the fee collection process at the earliest opportunity.
(3)Effective for services provided on and after July 1, 2002, the department shall charge a fee to the hospital of birth, birth or, for births not occurring in a hospital, to families of the newborn, newborn for newborn screening and followup services. The hospital of birth and families of newborns born outside the hospital shall make payment in full to the Genetic Disease Testing Fund. The department shall not charge or bill Medi-Cal beneficiaries for services provided pursuant to this chapter.
(4)(A)The department shall charge a fee for prenatal screening to support the pregnancy blood sample storage, testing, and research activities of the Birth Defects Monitoring Program.
(B)The prenatal screening fee for activities of the Birth Defects Monitoring Program shall be ten dollars ($10).
(5)The department shall set guidelines for invoicing, charging, and collecting from approved researchers the amount necessary to cover all expenses associated with research application requests made pursuant to this section, data linkage, retrieval, data processing, data entry, reinventory, and shipping of blood samples or their components, and related data management.
(6)The only funds from the Genetic Disease Testing Fund that may be used for the purpose of supporting the pregnancy blood sample storage, testing, and research activities of the Birth Defects Monitoring Program are those prenatal screening fees assessed and collected prior to the creation of the Birth Defects Monitoring Program Fund specifically to support those Birth Defects Monitoring Program activities.
(7)(A)The Birth Defects Monitoring Program Fund is hereby created as a special fund in the State Treasury. Fee revenues that are collected pursuant to paragraph (4) shall be deposited into the fund and shall be available upon appropriation by the Legislature to support the pregnancy blood sample storage, testing, and research activities of the Birth Defects Monitoring Program. Notwithstanding
(B)Notwithstanding Section 16305.7 of the Government Code, interest earned on funds in the Birth Defects Monitoring Program Fund shall be deposited as revenue into the fund to support the Birth Defects Monitoring Program.
(c)(1)The Legislature finds that timely implementation of changes in genetic screening programs and continuous maintenance of quality statewide services requires expeditious regulatory and administrative procedures to obtain the most cost-effective electronic data processing, hardware, software services, testing equipment, and testing and followup services.
(2)The expenditure of funds from the Genetic Disease Testing Fund for these purposes shall not be is not subject to Section 12102 of, and Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 10290) of Part 2 of Division 2 of, the Public Contract Code, Code or to Division 25.2 (commencing with Section 38070) of this code. The department shall provide the Department of Finance with documentation that equipment and services have been obtained at the lowest cost consistent with technical requirements for a comprehensive high-quality program.
(3)The expenditure of funds from the Genetic Disease Testing Fund for implementation of the Tandem Mass Spectrometry screening for fatty acid oxidation, amino acid, and organic acid disorders, and screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia hyperplasia, may be implemented through the amendment of the Genetic Disease Branch Screening Information System contracts and shall not be is not subject to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 12100) of Part 2 of Division 2 of the Public Contract Code, Article 4 (commencing with Section 19130) of Chapter 5 of Part 2 of Division 5 of Title 2 of the Government Code, and any policies, procedures, regulations, or manuals policy, procedure, regulation, or manual authorized by those laws.
(4)(A)The expenditure of funds from the Genetic Disease Testing Fund for the expansion of the Genetic Disease Branch Screening Information System to include cystic fibrosis, biotinidase, severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD), and any other disease that is detectable in blood samples, as specified in subdivision (d) of Section 125001, may be implemented through the amendment of the Genetic Disease Branch Screening Information System contracts, contracts and shall not be subject to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 10290) or Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 12100) of Part 2 of Division 2 of the Public Contract Code, Article 4 (commencing with Section 19130) of Chapter 5 of Part 2 of Division 5 of Title 2 of the Government Code, or Sections 4800 to 5180, inclusive, of the State Administrative Manual as they relate to approval of information technology projects or approval of increases in the duration or costs of information technology projects. This
(B)This paragraph shall apply to the design, development, and implementation of the expansion, expansion and to the maintenance and operation of the Genetic Disease Branch Screening Information System, including change requests, once the expansion is implemented.
(d)(1)The department may adopt emergency regulations to implement and make specific this chapter in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. For the purposes of the Administrative Procedure Act, the adoption of regulations shall be deemed an emergency and necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, or general welfare. Notwithstanding Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, these emergency regulations shall not be subject to the review and approval of the Office of Administrative Law. Notwithstanding Sections 11346.1 and 11349.6 of the Government Code, the department shall submit these regulations directly to the Secretary of State for filing. The regulations shall become effective immediately upon filing by the Secretary of State. Regulations shall be subject to public hearing within 120 days of filing with the Secretary of State and shall comply with Sections 11346.8 and 11346.9 of the Government Code or shall be repealed.
(2)The Office of Administrative Law shall provide for the printing and publication of these regulations in the California Code of Regulations. Notwithstanding Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, the regulations adopted pursuant to this chapter shall not be repealed by the Office of Administrative Law and shall remain in effect until revised or repealed by the department.
(3)The Legislature finds and declares that the health and safety of California newborns is in part dependent on an effective and adequately staffed genetic disease program, the cost of which shall be supported by the fees generated by the program.
SEC. 2.Section 125001 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:125001.(a)The department shall establish a program for the development, provision, and evaluation of genetic disease testing, testing and may provide laboratory testing facilities or make grants to, contract with, or make payments to, any laboratory that it deems qualified and cost effective to conduct testing or with any metabolic specialty clinic to provide necessary treatment with qualified specialists. The program shall provide genetic screening and followup services for persons who have the screening.
(b)The department shall expand statewide screening of newborns to include tandem mass spectrometry screening for fatty acid oxidation, amino acid, organic acid disorders, and congenital adrenal hyperplasia as soon as possible. The department shall provide information with respect to these disorders and available testing resources to all women receiving prenatal care and to all women admitted to a hospital for delivery. If the department is unable to provide this statewide screening by August 1, 2005, the department shall temporarily obtain these testing services through a competitive bid process from one or more public or private laboratories that meet the departments requirements for testing, quality assurance, and reporting. If the department determines that contracting for these services is more cost effective, and meets the other requirements of this chapter, than purchasing the tandem mass spectrometry equipment themselves, the department shall contract with one or more public or private laboratories.
(c)The department shall expand statewide screening of newborns to include screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) as soon as possible. In implementing the SCID screening test, the department shall also screen for other T-cell lymphopenias that are detectable as a result of screening for SCID, insofar as it does not require additional costs or equipment beyond that needed to test for SCID.
(d)The department shall expand statewide screening of newborns to include screening for adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) (ALD), Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD), and any other disease that is detectable in blood samples as soon as practicable, practicable but no later than two years after the disease is adopted by the federal Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP), (RUSP) or enrollment of the act amending this subdivision, whichever is later.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| May 16, 2024 | In committee: Held under submission. |
| May 8, 2024 | In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file. |
| Apr 24, 2024 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Mar 25, 2024 | In committee: Hearing postponed by committee. |
| Mar 4, 2024 | Referred to Com. on HEALTH. |
| Feb 15, 2024 | From printer. May be heard in committee March 16. |
| Feb 14, 2024 | Read first time. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2024 | Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar | Assembly Standing Committee on Health |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| Butte County SELPA | ** Support | |
| California Children's Hospital Assn | ** Support | |
| California Life Sciences | ** Support | |
| Capricor Therapeutics, INC. | ** Support | |
| Cureduchenne | ** Support | |
| National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners | ** Support | |
| North Santa Cruz County SELPA | ** Support | |
| Satellos Bioscience INC. | ** Support | |
| SELPA Administrators of California | ** Support | |
| Solano County Selpa | ** Support | |
| Solid Biosciences | ** Support | |
| The Akari Foundation | ** Support | |
| Yolo County SELPA | ** Support |
Date of Hearing: May 8, 2024
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Buffy Wicks, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 2563
Author:(Essayli) – As Introduced Ver:February 14, 2024
Policy Committee: | Health | Vote: | 16 - 0 |
|
| ||
|
|
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY:
This bill requires the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) to expand the Newborn Screening Program to include screening for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD), and expands the purposes for which moneys from the Genetic Disease Testing Fund are expended.
FISCAL EFFECT:
CDPH estimates first-year costs of adding DMD screening to be $8 to $11 million and ongoing costs in the range of $6 million to $8 million dollars thereafter (Genetic Disease Testing Fund). The first-year cost includes equipment and modification to the Screening Information System. The ongoing costs include supplies, consumables, design of result mailers, development of patient and provider educational materials, staffing for screening specimens for DMD, and follow-up activities at special care centers throughout California. CDPH states it does not have the capacity to include DMD in the screening panel and will need to create a new screening process. CDPH also notes DMD is still under review by the federal Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP), and there is currently no laboratory-developed DMD testing and no U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved kits for this disorder.
State law requires newborn screening in the Genetic Disease Screening Program (GDSP) be fee-supported, so the addition of DMD will require a fee increase to cover these costs.
COMMENTS:
- Purpose. This bill is sponsored by Destroy Duchenne. According to the author:
I am honored to be authoring AB 2563, a simple yet important bill which will add Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) to the statewide newborn screening panel. DMD is a debilitating and often fatal disorder that causes progressive muscle deterioration and weakness, affecting approximately 1 in 3,600 male infants worldwide. Early intervention and treatment can make a critical difference in the life of a DMD patient…
AB 2563 will bring California in line with the policies already enacted in states like Ohio and New York, along with many others currently considering similar proposals. California can and should be a leader in this space, as newborn screenings for DMD will save and improve thousands of lives each year.
- Background.
DMD. According to the Muscular Dystrophy Association, DMD is a genetic disorder characterized by progressive muscle degeneration and weakness due to the alterations of a protein called dystrophin that helps keep muscle cells intact. DMD symptom onset usually occurs between ages two and three years and primarily affects boys. Muscle weakness is the principal symptom, first affecting the muscles close to the core of the body, and later affecting the distal limb muscles. Usually, the lower external muscles are affected before the upper external muscles. Progressive weakness and scoliosis result in impaired pulmonary function, which can eventually cause acute respiratory failure. Life expectancy for those with DMD is about 25 years, but has increased, with some patients surviving beyond 30 years. In Europe and North America, the prevalence of DMD is approximately one in 3,500 to 5,000 newborns.
In March 2024, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Duvyzat (givinostat) oral medication for the treatment of DMD in patients six years of age and older. Duvyzat is the first nonsteroidal drug approved to treat patients with all genetic variants of DMD.
Newborn Screening for DMD. NBS for DMD has been performed, primarily as pilot studies, in various parts of the world since the 1970s as early detection was believed to be beneficial. The benefits include early treatments such as physical therapy, allowing families to prepare for supporting a child with DMD by accessing appropriate resources and considering family planning options for future children. In 2023, Ohio became the first state to mandate universal NBS for DMD, with New York following shortly thereafter.
Adding DMD to the California Newborn Screening Program. DMD screening is currently undergoing evidentiary review by the federal Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (ACHDNC). This bill would add DMD to California’s Newborn Screening Panel. However, SB 1095 (Pan), Chapter 393, Statutes of 2016, requires CDPH to expand statewide screening of newborns to include screening for any disease that is detectable in blood samples as soon as practicable, but no later than two years after the disease is adopted by the RUSP.
- Prior Legislation.
- SB 1095 (Pan) requires CDPH to expand statewide screening of newborns to include screening for any disease that is detectable in blood samples as soon as is practicable, but no later than two years after the disease is adopted by RUSP or enrollment of SB 1095, whichever is later.
- AB 1559 (Pan), Chapter 565, Statutes of 2014, requires the Newborn Screening Program to expand statewide screening of newborns to include screening for adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) as soon as ALD is adopted by the RUSP.
- SB 1095 (Pan) requires CDPH to expand statewide screening of newborns to include screening for any disease that is detectable in blood samples as soon as is practicable, but no later than two years after the disease is adopted by RUSP or enrollment of SB 1095, whichever is later.
Analysis Prepared by: Allegra Kim / APPR. / (916) 319-2081
Date of Hearing: April 23, 2024
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HEALTH
Mia Bonta, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 2563
Author:(Essayli) – As Introduced Ver:February 14, 2024
SUBJECT: Newborn screening program.
SUMMARY: Requires the State Department of Public Health (DPH) to expand statewide screening of newborns to include screening for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). Expands the purposes for which moneys from the Genetic Disease Testing Fund are expended.
EXISTING LAW:
- Establishes the policy of the state to make every effort to detect, as early as possible, phenylketonuria (PKU) and other preventable heritable or congenital disorders leading to intellectual disability or physical defects. [Health and Safety Code (HSC) § 125000]
- Requires DPH to establish a genetic disease unit to coordinate all programs in the area of genetic disease and to promote a statewide program of information, testing, and counseling services. Requires the unit to designate tests and regulations to be used in executing this program. [HSC § 125000]
- Requires DPH to establish a program for the development, provision, and evaluation of genetic disease testing. [HSC § 125001]
- Requires DPH to expand statewide screening of newborns to include tandem mass spectrometry screening for fatty acid oxidation, amino acid, organic acid disorders, and congenital adrenal hyperplasia as soon as possible. Requires DPH to provide information with respect to these disorders and available testing resources to all women receiving prenatal care and to all women admitted to a hospital for delivery. [HSC § 125001]
- Requires DPH expand statewide screening of newborns to include screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) as soon as possible. In implementing the SCID screening test, requires DPH to also screen for other T-cell lymphopenias that are detectable as a result of screening for SCID, insofar as it does not require additional costs or equipment beyond that needed to test for SCID. [HSC § 125001]
- Requires DPH to expand statewide screening of newborns to include screening for adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) and any other disease that is detectable in blood samples as soon as practicable, but no later than two years after the disease is adopted by the federal Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP), or enrollment of the act amending this subdivision, whichever is later. [HSC § 125001]
- Establishes the continuously appropriated Genetic Disease Testing Fund (GDTF), consisting of fees paid for newborn screening (NBS) tests, and states the intent of the Legislature that all costs of the genetic disease testing program be fully supported by fees paid for NBS tests, which are deposited in the GDTF. [HSC § 124977]
- Authorizes moneys in the GDTF to be used for the expansion of the Genetic Disease Branch Screening Information System to include cystic fibrosis, biotinidase, SCID, and ALD and exempts the expansion of contracts for this purpose from certain provisions of the Public Contract Code, the Government Code, and the State Administrative Manual, as specified. [HSC § 124977]
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown. This bill has not yet been analyzed by a fiscal committee.
COMMENTS:
- PURPOSE OF THIS BILL. According to the author, this bill will add DMD to the statewide NBS panel. The author states that DMD is a debilitating and often fatal disorder that causes progressive muscle deterioration and weakness, affecting approximately one in 3,600 male infants worldwide. The author further notes that early intervention and treatment can make a critical difference in the life of a DMD patient, and further investment into understanding this disorder will bring us closer to more effective treatments and a cure. The author continues that this bill will bring California in line with the policies already enacted in states like Ohio and New York, along with many others currently considering similar proposals. The author concludes California can and should be a leader in this space, as NBSs for DMD will save and improve lives.
- BACKGROUND.
- DMD. According to the Muscular Dystrophy Association, DMD is a genetic disorder characterized by progressive muscle degeneration and weakness due to the alterations of a protein called dystrophin that helps keep muscle cells intact. DMD symptom onset is in early childhood, usually between ages two and three. The disease primarily affects boys, but in rare cases it can affect girls. In Europe and North America, the prevalence of DMD is approximately six per 100,000 individuals. Muscle weakness is the principal symptom of DMD. It can begin as early as age two or three, first affecting the proximal muscles (those close to the core of the body) and later affecting the distal limb muscles (those close to the extremities). Usually, the lower external muscles are affected before the upper external muscles. The affected child might have difficulty jumping, running, and walking. Other symptoms include enlargement of the calves, a waddling gait, and lumbar lordosis (an inward curve of the spine). Later on, the heart and respiratory muscles are affected as well. Progressive weakness and scoliosis result in impaired pulmonary function, which can eventually cause acute respiratory failure. Life expectancy for those with DMD has increased over the years, with some patients surviving beyond 30 years. A 2015 study published in Pediatrics found that the prevalence of DMD has been estimated to be lower in Black individuals and higher in Latino individuals compared to white individuals. In terms of prevalence of DMD in California, there are five certified Duchenne Care Centers. The sponsor indicates these centers serve over 500 patients. It should be noted that this figure does not reflect all patients in California living with DMD, as there are patients who do not receive services from these centers.
- Treatment of DMD. In March 2024, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Duvyzat (givinostat) oral medication for the treatment of DMD in patients six years of age and older. Duvyzat is the first nonsteroidal drug approved to treat patients with all genetic variants of DMD. It is a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor that works by targeting pathogenic processes to reduce inflammation and loss of muscle.
- Benefits of NBS. NBS for DMD has been performed, primarily as pilot studies, in various parts of the world since the 1970s as early detection was believed to be beneficial. The benefits include early treatments such as physical therapy, allowing families to prepare for supporting a child with DMD by accessing appropriate resources and considering family planning options for future children. In 2023, Ohio became the first state to mandate universal NBS for DMD, with New York following shortly thereafter.
- Role of the federal government in NBS. In the United States, screening of newborns is under the purview of state public health departments. Each state decides which disorders to screen, and expansion of each state’s panel of screened conditions occurs on a state-by-state basis. The federal government also plays a role in NBS through the Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (ACHDNC) of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). The ACHDNC is charged with evaluating conditions for screening newborns and children for heritable disorders recommending to the Secretary of DHHS the conditions for which newborns and children should be screened. If accepted by the Secretary, these conditions become part of the Secretary’s RUSP which is made up of core and secondary conditions. Currently, there are 36 core and 25 secondary conditions on the Secretary’s RUSP. ACHDNC also established a system of nomination and evidence review to evaluate conditions that are candidates for screening.
- California Newborn Screening Program (CNSP). NBS began in California in 1966 with screening for one disorder, called PKU. The CNSP has expanded and now includes 80 different disorders, both genetic (passed down in families) and congenital (present at birth). To ensure the health of all its newborns, state law requires that all babies born in California have NBS soon after birth. The goal of the program is to identify babies with these disorders early, so that treatment can be started right away. A parent or guardian of the newborn child may only decline NBS based on the objection that it conflicts with his or her religious beliefs or practices. The CNSP takes a blood sample from a newborn’s heel from 12 to 48 hours after birth to check for genetic disorders. At the same time, the newborn receives a hearing and congenital heart disease screening.
- Adding DMD to CNSP. DMD screening is currently undergoing evidentiary review by ACHDNC. This bill would add DMD to California’s Newborn Screening Panel. SB 1095 (Pan), Chapter 393, Statutes of 2016, requires DPH to expand statewide screening of newborns to include screening for any disease that is detectable in blood samples as soon as the disease as practicable, but no later than two years after the disease is adopted by the RUSP.
- Genetic disease testing. In August 2023, the ACDHNC voted to move DMD screening to evidence-based review. The process is ongoing. For conditions that have been added to the RUSP using this process, the time from when a nomination is first presented to the Committee, to when the DHHS Secretary adds the condition to the RUSP has ranged from one year and nine months (21 months) to 10 years (120 months). Most have been around three to four years. According to information provided by the author’s office, DMD screening may face an uphill battle for inclusion in RUSP because testing technology is nascent and evidence of success is limited. According to a review published in Nature in 2021, neonatal screening is considered for neonatal-onset disorders for which early treatment shows strong evidence of improved outcome. The review further states that Although DMD does not fully meet these criteria, advocacy groups are in favour of an early diagnosis to enable early management and interventions. The review continues Emerging therapies that might be more effective when used in an early stage of the disease before irreversible muscle damage has occurred strengthen their request to include DMD in NBS.
- SUPPORT. This bill is supported by various groups, including Cure Duchenne (CD), who states that this bill would significantly reduce the diagnostic journey for families facing this devastating disease and enable them to access impactful treatments sooner. CCD continues that DMD is a devastating muscle disease. While rare, it is one of the most common forms of muscular dystrophy, occurring in approximately 1:5,000 male births. Those living with DMD lose their ability to walk, feed themselves, breathe independently and succumb to heart failure. CD further states that there is hope through new pharmacological and gene- based therapies, as there are now eight FDA approved treatments and more than 25 companies investing in finding a cure for this devastating disease. CD contends that while science is moving forward, diagnosis has not. Researchers and clinicians have been working for more than 20 years toward a genetic screening for DMD and yet the average age of diagnosis has remained at approximately five years old. This diagnostic delay is one too many families face—taking away precious time from patients and delaying access to the necessary medical guidance parents need to make informed decisions to give their child the best chance at a healthier, longer life. DMD can be detected at birth with the same drops of blood already used for the state’s NBS panel. CD concludes that this bill will ensure California families will not be faced with the same diagnostic delays and give California children timely access to much needed care to provide their best chance at a healthier and longer life.
- PREVIOUS LEGISLATION.
- SB 643 (Pan) of 2017 would have added DMD to the list of medical conditions eligible for coverage under the Genetically Handicapped Persons Program. SB 643 was vetoed.
- SB 1095 (Pan), Chapter 393, Statutes of 2016, requires the DPH to expand statewide screening of newborns to include screening for any disease that is detectable in blood samples as soon as the disease as practicable, but no later than two years after the disease is adopted by RUSP or enrollment of SB 1095, whichever is later.
- AB 1559 (Pan), Chapter 565, Statutes of 2014, requires DPH to expand statewide screening of newborns to include screening for ALD as soon as ALD is adopted by RUSP.
- AB 395 (Pan), Chapter 395, Statutes of 2011, requires DPH to expand statewide screening of newborns to include screening for SCID and, insofar as it does not require additional costs, other T-cell lymphopenias detectable as a result of screening for SCID, and would make related changes.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
Butte County SELPA
California Children's Hospital Assn
California Life Sciences
Capricor Therapeutics, INC.
CureDuchenne
National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners (NAPNAP)
North Santa Cruz County SELPA
Satellos Bioscience INC.
SELPA Administrators of California
Solano County SELPA
Solid Biosciences
The Akari Foundation
Yolo County SELPA
Opposition
None on file.
Analysis Prepared by: Eliza Brooks / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):