SB 1024: Animal abuse: responsible animal owner course: mandatory counseling.
- Session Year: 2017-2018
- House: Senate
- Latest Version Date: 2018-06-21
Existing law makes it a crime to maliciously and intentionally maim, mutilate, torture, wound, or kill a living animal. If a defendant is granted probation for a conviction under this provision, existing law requires the court to order the defendant to complete and pay for counseling designed to evaluate and treat behavior or conduct disorders, as specified.
This bill would delete the requirement that a defendant granted probation complete counseling and would instead require the court, for every defendant granted probation for this and other specified offenses against animals, to consider whether to order the person to undergo a mental health evaluation by an evaluator chosen by the court. The bill would require the defendant to pay for the evaluation and subsequent treatment, but would authorize the court to establish a sliding fee schedule based on the defendants ability to pay.
The bill would require the court, for every defendant granted probation for this and other specified offenses against animals, to consider ordering the person to complete a responsible animal owner education course. The bill would require the course to, among other things, consist of 5 instructional hours on specified subjects and test the participants mastery of the course. The bill would require a person ordered to complete the course to pay for the course, but would authorize the court to establish a sliding fee schedule based on the defendants ability to pay.Existing law makes it a crime to maliciously and intentionally maim, mutilate, torture, wound, or kill a living animal. If a defendant is granted probation for a conviction under this provision, existing law requires the court to order the defendant to complete and pay for counseling designed to evaluate and treat behavior or conduct disorders, as specified.
This bill would delete the requirement that a defendant granted probation complete counseling and would instead require a the court, for every defendant granted probation for this and other specified offenses against animals animals, to consider whether to order the person to undergo a mandatory mental health evaluation by an evaluator chosen by the court. The bill would require the defendant to pay for the evaluation and subsequent treatment, but would authorize the court to establish a sliding fee schedule based on the defendants ability to pay.
The bill would require a the court, for every defendant granted probation for this and other specified offenses against animals to be ordered to animals, to consider ordering the person to complete a responsible animal owner education course. The bill would require the course to, among other things, consist of 5 instructional hours on specified subjects and test the participants mastery of the course. The bill would require a person ordered to complete the course to pay for the course, but would authorize the court to establish a sliding fee schedule based on the defendants ability to pay.
The bill would increase the fines associated with specified offenses against animals, as provided.By increasing the punishment for a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.Existing law makes it a crime to maliciously and intentionally maim, mutilate, torture, wound, or kill a living animal. If a defendant is granted probation for a conviction under this provision, existing law requires the court to order the defendant to complete and pay for counseling designed to evaluate and treat behavior or conduct disorders, as specified.
This bill would delete the requirement that a defendant granted probation complete counseling and would instead require a defendant granted probation for this and other specified offenses against animals to undergo a mandatory mental health evaluation by the county mental health department or another an evaluator chosen by the court. By increasing the duties of local mental health officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The bill would require a defendant granted probation for this and other specified offenses against animals to be ordered to complete a responsible animal owner education course. The bill would require the State Department of Health Care Services to certify the course, as provided. The bill would require the course to, among other things, consist of 5 instructional hours on specified subjects and test the participants mastery of the course.
The bill would increase the fines associated with specified offenses against animals, as provided.
By increasing the punishment for a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law makes it a crime to maliciously and intentionally maim, mutilate, torture, wound, or kill a living animal. If a defendant is granted probation for a conviction under this provision, existing law requires the court to order the defendant to complete and pay for counseling designed to evaluate and treat behavior or conduct disorders. disorders, as specified.
This bill would delete the requirement that a defendant granted probation complete counseling and would instead require a defendant convicted of granted probation for this and other specified offenses against animals to undergo a mandatory mental health evaluation. The bill would require the defendant to undergo mandatory counseling if the mental health professional conducting the evaluation deems it necessary. The bill would require termination of any diversion program, probation, mandatory supervision, or postrelease community supervision for a failure to complete these requirements. evaluation by the county mental health department or another evaluator chosen by the court. By increasing the duties of local mental health officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The bill would require a defendant convicted of granted probation for this and other specified offenses against animals to be ordered to complete a responsible animal owner education course. The bill would require the State Department of Health Care Services to certify the course, as provided. The bill would require the course to, among other things, consist of 5 instructional hours on specified subjects and test the participants mastery of the course.
The bill would increase the fines associated with specified offenses against animals, as provided.
By increasing the punishment for a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Existing law makes it a crime to maliciously and intentionally maim, mutilate, torture, wound, or kill a living animal. If a defendant is granted probation for a conviction under this provision, existing law requires the court to order the defendant to complete counseling designed to evaluate and treat behavior or conduct disorders.
This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.This bill would delete the requirement that a defendant granted probation complete counseling and would instead require a defendant convicted of specified offenses against animals to undergo a mandatory mental health evaluation. The bill would require the defendant to undergo mandatory counseling if the mental health professional conducting the evaluation deems it necessary. The bill would require termination of any diversion program, probation, mandatory supervision, or postrelease community supervision for a failure to complete these requirements.
The bill would require a defendant convicted of specified offenses against animals to be ordered to complete a responsible animal owner education course. The bill would require the State Department of Health Care Services to certify the course, as provided. The bill would require the course to, among other things, consist of 5 instructional hours on specified subjects and test the participants mastery of the course.
The bill would increase the fines associated with specified offenses against animals, as provided.
By increasing the punishment for a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law makes it a crime to maliciously and intentionally maim, mutilate, torture, wound, or kill a living animal. If a defendant is granted probation for a conviction under this provision, existing law requires the court to order the defendant to complete counseling designed to evaluate and treat behavior or conduct disorders.
This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.
This act shall be known, and may be cited, as the Animal Cruelty and Violence Intervention Act of 2018.
SEC. 2.Section 597 of the Penal Code is amended to read:597.(a)Except as provided in subdivision (c) of this section or Section 599c, a person who maliciously and intentionally maims, mutilates, tortures, or wounds a living animal, or maliciously and intentionally kills an animal, is guilty of a crime punishable pursuant to subdivision (d).
(b)Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (a) or (c), a person who overdrives, overloads, drives when overloaded, overworks, tortures, torments, deprives of necessary sustenance, drink, or shelter, cruelly beats, mutilates, or cruelly kills an animal, or causes or procures an animal to be so overdriven, overloaded, driven when overloaded, overworked, tortured, tormented, deprived of necessary sustenance, drink, shelter, or to be cruelly beaten, mutilated, or cruelly killed; and whoever, having the charge or custody of an animal, either as owner or otherwise, subjects an animal to needless suffering, or inflicts unnecessary cruelty upon the animal, or in any manner abuses an animal, or fails to provide the animal with proper food, drink, or shelter, or protection from the weather, or who drives, rides, or otherwise uses the animal when unfit for labor, is, for each offense, guilty of a crime punishable pursuant to subdivision (d).
(c)A person who maliciously and intentionally maims, mutilates, or tortures a mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish, as described in subdivision (e), is guilty of a crime punishable pursuant to subdivision (d).
(d) A violation of subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is punishable as a felony by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170, or by a fine of not more than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment, or alternatively, as a misdemeanor by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine of not more than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment.
(e)(1)Subdivision (c) applies to any mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish which is a creature described as follows:
(A)Endangered species or threatened species as described in Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code.
(B)Fully protected birds described in Section 3511 of the Fish and Game Code.
(C)Fully protected mammals described in Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 4700) of Part 3 of Division 4 of the Fish and Game Code.
(D)Fully protected reptiles and amphibians described in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 5050) of Division 5 of the Fish and Game Code.
(E)Fully protected fish as described in Section 5515 of the Fish and Game Code.
(2)This subdivision does not supersede or affect any law relating to taking of the described species, including, but not limited to, Section 12008 of the Fish and Game Code.
(f)For the purposes of subdivision (c), each act of malicious and intentional maiming, mutilating, or torturing a separate specimen of a creature described in subdivision (e) is a separate offense. If a person is charged with a violation of subdivision (c), the proceedings shall be subject to Section 12157 of the Fish and Game Code.
(g)(1)Upon the conviction of a person charged with a violation of this section by causing or permitting an act of cruelty, as defined in Section 599b, all animals lawfully seized and impounded with respect to the violation by a peace officer, officer of a humane society, or officer of a pound or animal regulation department of a public agency shall be adjudged by the court to be forfeited and shall thereupon be awarded to the impounding officer for proper disposition. A person convicted of a violation of this section by causing or permitting an act of cruelty, as defined in Section 599b, shall be liable to the impounding officer for all costs of impoundment from the time of seizure to the time of proper disposition.
(2)Mandatory seizure or impoundment shall not apply to animals in properly conducted scientific experiments or investigations performed under the authority of the faculty of a regularly incorporated medical college or university of this state.
SEC. 3.Section 600.7 is added to the Penal Code, to read:600.7.(a)For every defendant who is granted probation for an offense specified in subdivision (c), the court shall consider whether to order that person to complete the responsible animal owner education course described in subdivision (b). A defendant ordered to complete the course shall pay for the course, except, when the court finds that the defendant is financially unable to pay for the course, the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based upon the defendants ability to pay.(b)(1)The responsible animal owner education course for persons convicted of an offense specified in subdivision (c) may be conducted online or in person, or in a combination of both, and shall consist of all of the following:(A)A minimum of five instructional hours.(B)Mechanisms to ensure the minimum hours of instruction have been completed by the participant.(C)Attendance shall be verified. If the course is completed online, the course provider shall maintain a system to validate the identity of the person taking the course.(D)The course provider shall incorporate a validation process that verifies participant comprehension of course material related to the educational objectives as follows:(i)The course provider shall test the participants mastery of the course content by asking at least two questions from each major unit or section. The questions shall be multiple choice.(ii)The questions shall be difficult enough that the answer may not be easily determined without having viewed the contents of the major unit or section.(2)The educational objectives of the responsible animal owner course shall include, but not be limited to, promotion of all of the following:(A)Responsible care concepts for animals, both livestock and nonlivestock, including instruction on providing for the health, safety, and welfare of livestock and nonlivestock animals and wildlife, including appropriate shelter and housing, the importance of spaying and neutering, and the proper tethering and transportation of animals.(B)Responsible pet ownership, including, but not limited to, ensuring the safety of both the community and the animal and bite prevention.(C)Respect and observance of federal and state laws that protect livestock and nonlivestock animals and wildlife.(D)An overview of state and federal laws related to cruelty to livestock and nonlivestock animals and animal fighting.(E)Appropriate training and discipline tactics for livestock and nonlivestock animals.(c)This section applies to a conviction for any of the following offenses:(1)Section 286.5.(2)Section 596.(3)Section 596.5.(4)Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 597.(5)Paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 597.1.(6)Subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 597.5.(7)Section 597.6.(8)Section 597.7.(9)Section 597a.(10)Section 597b.(11)Section 597c.(12)Section 597f.(13)Section 597g.(14)Section 597h.(15)Section 597i.(16)Section 597j.(17)Section 597k.(18)Section 597m.(19)Section 597n.(20)Section 597s.(21)Section 597t.(22)Section 597u.(23)Section 597v.(24)Section 597x.(25)Section 597z.(26)Section 599f.(27)Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 600.(28)Section 600.2.(29)Section 600.5.SEC. 4.SEC. 3.Section 600.8 is added to the Penal Code, to read:600.8.(a)For every defendant who is granted probation for an offense specified in subdivision (b), the court shall consider whether to order that the person undergo a mental health evaluation by an evaluator chosen by the court. Upon evaluation, if the evaluating mental health professional deems it necessary, the defendant shall complete mandatory counseling. Mental health evaluations and any subsequent treatment shall be paid for by the defendant. If the court finds that the defendant is financially unable to pay for that counseling, the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based upon the defendants ability to pay.
(b)This section applies to a conviction for any of the following offenses:
(1)Section 286.5.
(2)Section 596.
(3)Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 597.
(4)Paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 597.1.
(5)Section 597f.
(6)Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 600.
(7)Section 600.2.
(8)Section 600.5.
This act shall be known, and may be cited, as the Animal Cruelty and Violence Intervention Act of 2018.
SEC. 2.Section 286.5 of the Penal Code is amended to read:286.5.A person who sexually assaults an animal protected by Section 597f for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of the person is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding six months, by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment.SEC. 3.Section 596 of the Penal Code is amended to read:596.(a)A person who, without the consent of the owner, willfully administers poison to an animal, the property of another, or exposes a poisonous substance, with the intent that the same shall be taken or swallowed by an animal, is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding six months, by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment.(b)However, this section does not apply when a person exposes poisonous substances upon premises or property owned or controlled by him or her for the purpose of controlling or destroying predatory animals or livestock-killing dogs and if, prior to or during the placing out of the poisonous substances, he or she shall have posted upon the property conspicuous signs located at intervals of distance not greater than one-third of a mile apart, and in any case not less than three signs having words with letters at least one inch high reading WarningPoisoned bait placed out on these premises, which signs shall be kept in place until the poisonous substances have been removed. When these signs have been conspicuously located upon the property or premises owned or controlled by him or her as required by this section, that person shall not be charged with any civil liability to another party in the event that any domestic animal belonging to that party becomes injured or killed by trespassing or partaking of the poisonous substance or substances so placed.SEC. 4.SEC. 2.Section 597 of the Penal Code is amended to read:597.(a)Except as provided in subdivision (c) of this section or Section 599c, a person who maliciously and intentionally maims, mutilates, tortures, or wounds a living animal, or maliciously and intentionally kills an animal, is guilty of a crime punishable pursuant to subdivision (d).
(b)Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (a) or (c), a person who overdrives, overloads, drives when overloaded, overworks, tortures, torments, deprives of necessary sustenance, drink, or shelter, cruelly beats, mutilates, or cruelly kills an animal, or causes or procures an animal to be so overdriven, overloaded, driven when overloaded, overworked, tortured, tormented, deprived of necessary sustenance, drink, shelter, or to be cruelly beaten, mutilated, or cruelly killed; and whoever, having the charge or custody of an animal, either as owner or otherwise, subjects an animal to needless suffering, or inflicts unnecessary cruelty upon the animal, or in any manner abuses an animal, or fails to provide the animal with proper food, drink, or shelter, or protection from the weather, or who drives, rides, or otherwise uses the animal when unfit for labor, is, for each offense, guilty of a crime punishable pursuant to subdivision (d).
(c)A person who maliciously and intentionally maims, mutilates, or tortures a mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish, as described in subdivision (e), is guilty of a crime punishable pursuant to subdivision (d).
(d) A violation of subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is punishable as a felony by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170, or by a fine of not more than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment, or alternatively, as a misdemeanor by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine of not more than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment.
(e)(1)Subdivision (c) applies to any mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish which is a creature described as follows:
(A)Endangered species or threatened species as described in Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code.
(B)Fully protected birds described in Section 3511 of the Fish and Game Code.
(C)Fully protected mammals described in Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 4700) of Part 3 of Division 4 of the Fish and Game Code.
(D)Fully protected reptiles and amphibians described in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 5050) of Division 5 of the Fish and Game Code.
(E)Fully protected fish as described in Section 5515 of the Fish and Game Code.
(2)This subdivision does not supersede or affect any law relating to taking of the described species, including, but not limited to, Section 12008 of the Fish and Game Code.
(f)For the purposes of subdivision (c), each act of malicious and intentional maiming, mutilating, or torturing a separate specimen of a creature described in subdivision (e) is a separate offense. If a person is charged with a violation of subdivision (c), the proceedings shall be subject to Section 12157 of the Fish and Game Code.
(g)(1)Upon the conviction of a person charged with a violation of this section by causing or permitting an act of cruelty, as defined in Section 599b, all animals lawfully seized and impounded with respect to the violation by a peace officer, officer of a humane society, or officer of a pound or animal regulation department of a public agency shall be adjudged by the court to be forfeited and shall thereupon be awarded to the impounding officer for proper disposition. A person convicted of a violation of this section by causing or permitting an act of cruelty, as defined in Section 599b, shall be liable to the impounding officer for all costs of impoundment from the time of seizure to the time of proper disposition.
(2)Mandatory seizure or impoundment shall not apply to animals in properly conducted scientific experiments or investigations performed under the authority of the faculty of a regularly incorporated medical college or university of this state.
SEC. 5.Section 597.1 of the Penal Code is amended to read:597.1.(a)(1)Every owner, driver, or keeper of any animal who permits the animal to be in any building, enclosure, lane, street, square, or lot of any city, county, city and county, or judicial district without proper care and attention is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding six months, by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment. Any peace officer, humane society officer, or animal control officer shall take possession of the stray or abandoned animal and shall provide care and treatment for the animal until the animal is deemed to be in suitable condition to be returned to the owner. When the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that very prompt action is required to protect the health or safety of the animal or the health or safety of others, the officer shall immediately seize the animal and comply with subdivision (f). In all other cases, the officer shall comply with the provisions of subdivision (g). The full cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized under this subdivision or pursuant to a search warrant shall constitute a lien on the animal and the animal shall not be returned to its owner until the charges are paid, if the seizure is upheld pursuant to this section.(2)Notwithstanding any other law, if an animal control officer or humane officer, when necessary to protect the health and safety of a wild, stray, or abandoned animal or the health and safety of others, seeks to administer a tranquilizer that contains a controlled substance, as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code, to gain control of that animal, he or she may possess and administer that tranquilizer with direct or indirect supervision as determined by a licensed veterinarian, provided that the officer has met each of the following requirements:(A)Has received training in the administration of tranquilizers from a licensed veterinarian. The training shall be approved by the California Veterinary Medical Board.(B)Has successfully completed the firearms component of a course relating to the exercise of police powers, as set forth in Section 832.(C)Is authorized by his or her agency or organization to possess and administer the tranquilizer in accordance with a policy established by the agency or organization and approved by the veterinarian who obtained the controlled substance.(D)Has successfully completed the euthanasia training set forth in Section 2039 of Title 16 of the California Code of Regulations.(E)Has completed a state and federal fingerprinting background check and does not have any drug- or alcohol-related convictions.(b)Every sick, disabled, infirm, or crippled animal, except a dog or cat, that is abandoned in any city, county, city and county, or judicial district may be killed by the officer if, after a reasonable search, no owner of the animal can be found. It shall be the duty of all peace officers, humane society officers, and animal control officers to cause the animal to be killed or rehabilitated and placed in a suitable home on information that the animal is stray or abandoned. The officer may likewise take charge of any animal, including a dog or cat, that by reason of lameness, sickness, feebleness, or neglect, is unfit for the labor it is performing, or that in any other manner is being cruelly treated, and provide care and treatment for the animal until it is deemed to be in a suitable condition to be returned to the owner. When the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that very prompt action is required to protect the health or safety of an animal or the health or safety of others, the officer shall immediately seize the animal and comply with subdivision (f). In all other cases, the officer shall comply with subdivision (g). The full cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized under this subdivision or pursuant to a search warrant shall constitute a lien on the animal and the animal shall not be returned to its owner until the charges are paid.(c)(1)A peace officer, humane society officer, or animal control officer shall convey all injured cats and dogs found without their owners in a public place directly to a veterinarian known by the officer to be a veterinarian who ordinarily treats dogs and cats for a determination of whether the animal shall be immediately and humanely destroyed or shall be hospitalized under proper care and given emergency treatment.(2)If the owner does not redeem the animal within the locally prescribed waiting period, the veterinarian may personally perform euthanasia on the animal. If the animal is treated and recovers from its injuries, the veterinarian may keep the animal for purposes of adoption, provided the responsible animal control agency has first been contacted and has refused to take possession of the animal.(3)When an animal is transferred to a veterinarian in a clinic, such as an emergency clinic that is not in continuous operation, the veterinarian may, in turn, transfer the animal to an appropriate facility.(4)If the veterinarian determines that the animal shall be hospitalized under proper care and given emergency treatment, the costs of any services that are provided pending the owners inquiry to the responsible agency, department, or society shall be paid from the dog license fees, fines, and fees for impounding dogs in the city, county, or city and county in which the animal was licensed or, if the animal is unlicensed, shall be paid by the jurisdiction in which the animal was found, subject to the provision that this cost be repaid by the animals owner. The full cost of caring for and treating any animal seized under this subdivision shall constitute a lien on the animal and the animal shall not be returned to the owner until the charges are paid. A veterinarian shall not be criminally or civilly liable for any decision that he or she makes or for services that he or she provides pursuant to this subdivision.(d)An animal control agency that takes possession of an animal pursuant to subdivision (c) shall keep records of the whereabouts of the animal from the time of possession to the end of the animals impoundment, and those records shall be available for inspection by the public, upon request, for three years after the date the animals impoundment ended.(e)Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, a peace officer, humane society officer, or an animal control officer may, with the approval of his or her immediate superior, humanely destroy any stray or abandoned animal in the field when the animal is too severely injured to move or where a veterinarian is not available and it would be more humane to euthanize the animal.(f)When an officer authorized under this section seizes or impounds an animal based on a reasonable belief that prompt action is required to protect the health or safety of the animal or the health or safety of others, the officer shall, prior to the commencement of any criminal proceedings authorized by this section, provide the owner or keeper of the animal, if known or ascertainable after reasonable investigation, with the opportunity for a postseizure hearing to determine the validity of the seizure or impoundment, or both.(1)The agency shall cause a notice to be affixed to a conspicuous place where the animal was situated or personally deliver a notice of the seizure or impoundment, or both, to the owner or keeper within 48 hours, excluding weekends and holidays. The notice shall include all of the following:(A)The name, business address, and telephone number of the officer providing the notice.(B)A description of the animal seized, including any identification upon the animal.(C)The authority and purpose for the seizure or impoundment, including the time, place, and circumstances under which the animal was seized.(D)A statement that, in order to receive a postseizure hearing, the owner or person authorized to keep the animal, or his or her agent, shall request the hearing by signing and returning an enclosed declaration of ownership or right to keep the animal to the agency providing the notice within 10 days, including weekends and holidays, of the date of the notice. The declaration may be returned by personal delivery or mail.(E)A statement that the full cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized under this section is a lien on the animal and that the animal shall not be returned to the owner until the charges are paid, and that failure to request or to attend a scheduled hearing shall result in liability for this cost.(2)The postseizure hearing shall be conducted within 48 hours of the request, excluding weekends and holidays. The seizing agency may authorize its own officer or employee to conduct the hearing if the hearing officer is not the same person who directed the seizure or impoundment of the animal and is not junior in rank to that person. The agency may utilize the services of a hearing officer from outside the agency for the purposes of complying with this section.(3)Failure of the owner or keeper, or of his or her agent, to request or to attend a scheduled hearing shall result in a forfeiture of any right to a postseizure hearing or right to challenge his or her liability for costs incurred.(4)The agency, department, or society employing the person who directed the seizure shall be responsible for the costs incurred for caring and treating the animal, if it is determined in the postseizure hearing that the seizing officer did not have reasonable grounds to believe very prompt action, including seizure of the animal, was required to protect the health or safety of the animal or the health or safety of others. If it is determined the seizure was justified, the owner or keeper shall be personally liable to the seizing agency for the full cost of the seizure and care of the animal. The charges for the seizure and care of the animal shall be a lien on the animal. The animal shall not be returned to its owner until the charges are paid and the owner demonstrates to the satisfaction of the seizing agency or the hearing officer that the owner can and will provide the necessary care for the animal.(g)When the need for immediate seizure is not present and prior to the commencement of any criminal proceedings authorized by this section, the agency shall provide the owner or keeper of the animal, if known or ascertainable after reasonable investigation, with the opportunity for a hearing prior to any seizure or impoundment of the animal. The owner shall produce the animal at the time of the hearing unless, prior to the hearing, the owner has made arrangements with the agency to view the animal upon request of the agency, or unless the owner can provide verification that the animal was humanely destroyed. Any person who willfully fails to produce the animal or provide the verification is guilty of an infraction, punishable by a fine of not less than two hundred fifty dollars ($250) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).(1)The agency shall cause a notice to be affixed to a conspicuous place where the animal was situated or personally deliver a notice stating the grounds for believing the animal should be seized under subdivision (a) or (b). The notice shall include all of the following:(A)The name, business address, and telephone number of the officer providing the notice.(B)A description of the animal to be seized, including any identification upon the animal.(C)The authority and purpose for the possible seizure or impoundment.(D)A statement that, in order to receive a hearing prior to any seizure, the owner or person authorized to keep the animal, or his or her agent, shall request the hearing by signing and returning the enclosed declaration of ownership or right to keep the animal to the officer providing the notice within two days, excluding weekends and holidays, of the date of the notice.(E)A statement that the cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized under this section is a lien on the animal, that any animal seized shall not be returned to the owner until the charges are paid, and that failure to request or to attend a scheduled hearing shall result in a conclusive determination that the animal may properly be seized and that the owner shall be liable for the charges.(2)The preseizure hearing shall be conducted within 48 hours, excluding weekends and holidays, after receipt of the request. The seizing agency may authorize its own officer or employee to conduct the hearing if the hearing officer is not the same person who requests the seizure or impoundment of the animal and is not junior in rank to that person. The agency may utilize the services of a hearing officer from outside the agency for the purposes of complying with this section.(3)Failure of the owner or keeper, or his or her agent, to request or to attend a scheduled hearing shall result in a forfeiture of any right to a preseizure hearing or right to challenge his or her liability for costs incurred pursuant to this section.(4)The hearing officer, after the hearing, may affirm or deny the owners or keepers right to custody of the animal and, if reasonable grounds are established, may order the seizure or impoundment of the animal for care and treatment.(h)When an animal is properly seized under this section or pursuant to a search warrant, the owner or keeper shall be personally liable to the seizing agency for the cost of the seizure and care of the animal. Further, if the charges for the seizure or impoundment and any other charges permitted under this section are not paid within 14 days of the seizure, or if the owner, within 14 days of notice of availability of the animal to be returned, fails to pay charges permitted under this section and take possession of the animal, the animal shall be deemed to have been abandoned and may be disposed of by the seizing agency.(i)If the animal requires veterinary care and the humane society or public agency is not assured, within 14 days of the seizure of the animal, that the owner will provide the necessary care, the animal shall not be returned to its owner and shall be deemed to have been abandoned and may be disposed of by the seizing agency. A veterinarian may humanely destroy an impounded animal without regard to the prescribed holding period when it has been determined that the animal has incurred severe injuries or is incurably crippled. A veterinarian also may immediately humanely destroy an impounded animal afflicted with a serious contagious disease unless the owner or his or her agent immediately authorizes treatment of the animal by a veterinarian at the expense of the owner or agent.(j)An animal properly seized under this section or pursuant to a search warrant shall not be returned to its owner until the owner can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the seizing agency or hearing officer that the owner can and will provide the necessary care for the animal.(k)(1)In the case of cats and dogs, prior to the final disposition of any criminal charges, the seizing agency or prosecuting attorney may file a petition in a criminal action requesting that, prior to that final disposition, the court issue an order forfeiting the animal to the city, county, or seizing agency. The petitioner shall serve a true copy of the petition upon the defendant and the prosecuting attorney.(2)Upon receipt of the petition, the court shall set a hearing on the petition. The hearing shall be conducted within 14 days after the filing of the petition, or as soon as practicable.(3)The petitioner shall have the burden of establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that, even in the event of an acquittal of the criminal charges, the owner will not legally be permitted to retain the animal in question. If the court finds that the petitioner has met its burden, the court shall order the immediate forfeiture of the animal as sought by the petition.(4)This subdivision does not authorize a seizing agency or prosecuting attorney to file a petition to determine an owners ability to legally retain an animal pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (l) if a petition has previously been filed pursuant to this subdivision.(l)(1)Upon the conviction of a person charged with a violation of this section, or Section 597 or 597a, all animals lawfully seized and impounded with respect to the violation shall be adjudged by the court to be forfeited and shall thereupon be transferred to the impounding officer or appropriate public entity for proper adoption or other disposition. A person convicted of a violation of this section shall be personally liable to the seizing agency for all costs of impoundment from the time of seizure to the time of proper disposition. Upon conviction, the court shall order the convicted person to make payment to the appropriate public entity for the costs incurred in the housing, care, feeding, and treatment of the seized or impounded animals. Each person convicted in connection with a particular animal may be held jointly and severally liable for restitution for that particular animal. The payment shall be in addition to any other fine or sentence ordered by the court.(2)The court may also order, as a condition of probation, that the convicted person be prohibited from owning, possessing, caring for, or residing with, animals of any kind, and require the convicted person to immediately deliver all animals in his or her possession to a designated public entity for adoption or other lawful disposition or provide proof to the court that the person no longer has possession, care, or control of any animals. In the event of the acquittal or final discharge without conviction of the person charged, if the animal is still impounded, the animal has not been previously deemed abandoned pursuant to subdivision (h), the court has not ordered that the animal be forfeited pursuant to subdivision (k), the court shall, on demand, direct the release of seized or impounded animals to the defendant upon a showing of proof of ownership.(3)Any questions regarding ownership shall be determined in a separate hearing by the court where the criminal case was finally adjudicated and the court shall hear testimony from any persons who may assist the court in determining ownership of the animal. If the owner is determined to be unknown or the owner is prohibited or unable to retain possession of the animals for any reason, the court shall order the animals to be released to the appropriate public entity for adoption or other lawful disposition. This section is not intended to cause the release of any animal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish seized or impounded pursuant to any other statute, ordinance, or municipal regulation. This section shall not prohibit the seizure or impoundment of animals as evidence as provided for under any other law.(m)It shall be the duty of all peace officers, humane society officers, and animal control officers to use all currently acceptable methods of identification, both electronic and otherwise, to determine the lawful owner or caretaker of any seized or impounded animal. It shall also be their duty to make reasonable efforts to notify the owner or caretaker of the whereabouts of the animal and any procedures available for the lawful recovery of the animal and, upon the owners and caretakers initiation of recovery procedures, retain custody of the animal for a reasonable period of time to allow for completion of the recovery process. Efforts to locate or contact the owner or caretaker and communications with persons claiming to be the owner or caretaker shall be recorded and maintained and be made available for public inspection.SEC. 6.Section 597f of the Penal Code is amended to read:597f.(a)Every owner, driver, or possessor of any animal, who permits the animal to be in any building, enclosure, lane, street, square, or lot, of any city, city and county, or judicial district, without proper care and attention, shall, on conviction, be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding six months, by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment. It shall be the duty of any peace officer, officer of the humane society, or officer of a pound or animal regulation department of a public agency, to take possession of the animal so abandoned or neglected and care for the animal until it is redeemed by the owner or claimant, and the cost of caring for the animal shall be a lien on the animal until the charges are paid. Every sick, disabled, infirm, or crippled animal, except a dog or cat, abandoned in a city, city and county, or judicial district, may, if after due search no owner can be found therefor, be killed by the officer. It shall be the duty of all peace officers, an officer of a humane society, or officer of a pound or animal regulation department of a public agency to cause the animal to be killed on information of abandonment. The officer may likewise take charge of any animal, including a dog or cat, that, by reason of lameness, sickness, feebleness, or neglect, is unfit for the labor it is performing, or that in any other manner is being cruelly treated and, if the animal is not then in the custody of its owner, the officer shall give notice thereof to the owner, if known, and may provide suitable care for the animal until it is deemed to be in a suitable condition to be delivered to the owner. Any necessary expenses that are incurred for taking care of and keeping the animal shall be a lien on the animal, to be paid before the animal can be lawfully recovered.(b)(1)It is the duty of all officers of pounds or humane societies, and animal regulation departments of public agencies to convey, and for police and sheriff departments, to cause to be conveyed all injured cats and dogs found without their owners in a public place directly to a veterinarian known by the officer or agency to be a veterinarian that ordinarily treats dogs and cats for a determination of whether the animal shall be immediately and humanely destroyed or shall be hospitalized under proper care and given emergency treatment.(2)If the owner does not redeem the animal within the locally prescribed waiting period, the veterinarian may personally perform euthanasia on the animal, or, if the animal is treated and recovers from its injuries, the veterinarian may keep the animal for purposes of adoption, provided the responsible animal control agency has first been contacted and has refused to take possession of the animal.(3)When an animal is transferred pursuant to this subdivision to a veterinarian in a clinic, such as an emergency clinic that is not in continuous operation, the veterinarian may, in turn, transfer the animal to an appropriate facility.(4)If the veterinarian determines that the animal shall be hospitalized under proper care and given emergency treatment, the costs of any services that are provided pending the owners inquiry to the agency, department, or society shall be paid from the dog license fees, fines, and fees for impounding dogs in the city, county, or city and county in which the animal was licensed or, if the animal is unlicensed, the jurisdiction in which the animal was found, subject to the provision that this cost be repaid by the animals owner. A veterinarian shall not be criminally or civilly liable for any decision that he or she makes or services that he or she provides pursuant to this section.(c)An animal control agency that takes possession of an animal pursuant to subdivision (b), shall keep records of the whereabouts of the animal for a 72-hour period from the time of possession and those records shall be available to inspection by the public upon request.(d)Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, any officer of a pound or animal regulation department or humane society, or any officer of a police or sheriffs department may, with the approval of his or her immediate superior, humanely destroy any abandoned animal in the field when the animal is too severely injured to move or when a veterinarian is not available and it would be more humane to dispose of the animal.SEC. 7.Section 600 of the Penal Code is amended to read:600.(a)A person who willfully and maliciously and with no legal justification strikes, beats, kicks, cuts, stabs, shoots with a firearm, administers any poison or other harmful or stupefying substance to, or throws, hurls, or projects at, or places any rock, object, or other substance that is used in a manner capable of producing injury and likely to produce injury, on or in the path of, a horse being used by, or a dog under the supervision of, a peace officer in the discharge or attempted discharge of his or her duties, or a volunteer who is acting under the direct supervision of a peace officer in the discharge or attempted discharge of his or her assigned volunteer duties, is guilty of a public offense. If the injury inflicted is a serious injury, as described in subdivision (c), the person shall be punished by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for 16 months, or two or three years, or in a county jail for not exceeding one year, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both a fine and imprisonment. If the injury inflicted is not a serious injury, the person shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for not exceeding one year, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both a fine and imprisonment.(b)A person who willfully and maliciously and with no legal justification interferes with or obstructs a horse or dog being used by a peace officer in the discharge or attempted discharge of his or her duties, or a volunteer who is acting under the direct supervision of a peace officer in the discharge or attempted discharge of his or her assigned volunteer duties, by frightening, teasing, agitating, harassing, or hindering the horse or dog shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for not exceeding one year, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both a fine and imprisonment.(c)A person who, in violation of this section, and with intent to inflict that injury or death, personally causes the death, destruction, or serious physical injury including bone fracture, loss or impairment of function of any bodily member, wounds requiring extensive suturing, or serious crippling, of a horse or dog, shall, upon conviction of a felony under this section, in addition and consecutive to the punishment prescribed for the felony, be punished by an additional term of imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for one year.(d)A person who, in violation of this section, and with the intent to inflict that injury, personally causes great bodily injury, as defined in Section 12022.7, to any person not an accomplice, shall, upon conviction of a felony under this section, in addition and consecutive to the punishment prescribed for the felony, be punished by an additional term of imprisonment in the state prison for two years unless the conduct described in this subdivision is an element of any other offense of which the person is convicted or receives an enhancement under Section 12022.7.(e)A defendant convicted of a violation of this section shall be ordered to make restitution to the agency owning the animal and employing the peace officer, to a volunteer who is acting under the direct supervision of a peace officer who is using his or her horse or supervising his or her dog in the performance of his or her assigned duties, or to the agency that provides, or the individual who provides, veterinary health care coverage or veterinary care for a horse or dog being used by, or under the supervision of, a volunteer who is acting under the direct supervision of a peace officer for any veterinary bills, replacement costs of the animal if it is disabled or killed, and, if applicable, the salary of the peace officer for the period of time his or her services are lost to the agency.SEC. 8.SEC. 3.Section 600.7 is added to the Penal Code, to read:600.7.(a)Every For every defendant who is granted probation for an offense specified in subdivision (c) shall be ordered to pay for and (c), the court shall consider whether to order that person to complete the responsible animal owner education course described in subdivision (b). If A defendant ordered to complete the course shall pay for the course, except, when the court finds that the defendant is financially unable to pay for the course, the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based upon the defendants ability to pay.
(b)(1)The responsible animal owner education course for persons convicted of an offense specified in subdivision (c) may be conducted online or in person, or in a combination of both, and shall consist of all of the following:
(A)A minimum of five instructional hours.
(B)Mechanisms to ensure the minimum hours of instruction have been completed by the participant.
(C)Attendance shall be verified. If the course is completed online, the course provider shall maintain a system to validate the identity of the person taking the course.
(D)The course provider shall incorporate a validation process that verifies participant comprehension of course material related to the educational objectives as follows:
(i)The course provider shall test the participants mastery of the course content by asking at least two questions from each major unit or section. The questions shall be multiple choice.
(ii)The questions shall be difficult enough that the answer may not be easily determined without having viewed the contents of the major unit or section.
(2)The educational objectives of the responsible animal owner course shall include, but not be limited to, promotion of all of the following:
(A)Responsible care concepts for animals, both livestock and nonlivestock, including instruction on providing for the health, safety, and welfare of livestock and nonlivestock animals and wildlife, including appropriate shelter and housing, the importance of spaying and neutering, and the proper tethering and transportation of animals.
(B)Responsible pet ownership, including, but not limited to, ensuring the safety of both the community and the animal and bite prevention.
(C)Respect and observance of federal and state laws that protect livestock and nonlivestock animals and wildlife.
(D)An overview of state and federal laws related to cruelty to livestock and nonlivestock animals and animal fighting.
(E)Appropriate training and discipline tactics for livestock and nonlivestock animals.
(c)This section applies to a conviction for any of the following offenses:
(1)Section 286.5.
(2)Section 596.
(3)Section 596.5.
(4)Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 597.
(5)Paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 597.1.
(6)Subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 597.5.
(7)Section 597.6.
(8)Section 597.7.
(9)Section 597a.
(10)Section 597b.
(11)Section 597c.
(12)Section 597f.
(13)Section 597g.
(14)Section 597h.
(15)Section 597i.
(16)Section 597j.
(17)Section 597k.
(18)Section 597m.
(19)Section 597n.
(20)Section 597s.
(21)Section 597t.
(22)Section 597u.
(23)Section 597v.
(24)Section 597x.
(25)Section 597z.
(26)Section 599f.
(27)Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 600.
(28)Section 600.2.
(29)Section 600.5.
SEC. 9.SEC. 4.Section 600.8 is added to the Penal Code, to read:600.8.(a)Every For every defendant who is granted probation for an offense specified in subdivision (b) shall be subject to a mandatory (b), the court shall consider whether to order that the person undergo a mental health evaluation by an evaluator chosen by the court. Upon evaluation, if the evaluating mental health professional deems it necessary, the defendant shall complete mandatory counseling. Mental health evaluations and any subsequent treatment shall be paid for by the defendant. If the court finds that the defendant is financially unable to pay for that counseling, the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based upon the defendants ability to pay.
(b)This section applies to a conviction for any of the following offenses:
(1)Section 286.5.
(2)Section 596.
(3)Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 597.
(4)Paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 597.1.
(5)Section 597f.
(6)Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 600.
(7)Section 600.2.
(8)Section 600.5.
SEC. 10.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.This act shall be known, and may be cited, as the Animal Cruelty and Violence Intervention Act of 2018.
SEC. 2.Section 286.5 of the Penal Code is amended to read:286.5.A person who sexually assaults an animal protected by Section 597f for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of the person is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding six months, by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment.
SEC. 3.Section 596 of the Penal Code is amended to read:596.(a)A person who, without the consent of the owner, willfully administers poison to an animal, the property of another, or exposes a poisonous substance, with the intent that the same shall be taken or swallowed by an animal, is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding six months, by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment.
(b)However, this section does not apply when a person exposes poisonous substances upon premises or property owned or controlled by him or her for the purpose of controlling or destroying predatory animals or livestock-killing dogs and if, prior to or during the placing out of the poisonous substances, he or she shall have posted upon the property conspicuous signs located at intervals of distance not greater than one-third of a mile apart, and in any case not less than three signs having words with letters at least one inch high reading WarningPoisoned bait placed out on these premises, which signs shall be kept in place until the poisonous substances have been removed. When these signs have been conspicuously located upon the property or premises owned or controlled by him or her as required by this section, that person shall not be charged with any civil liability to another party in the event that any domestic animal belonging to that party becomes injured or killed by trespassing or partaking of the poisonous substance or substances so placed.
SEC. 4.Section 597 of the Penal Code is amended to read:597.(a)Except as provided in subdivision (c) of this section or Section 599c, a person who maliciously and intentionally maims, mutilates, tortures, or wounds a living animal, or maliciously and intentionally kills an animal, is guilty of a crime punishable pursuant to subdivision (d).
(b)Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (a) or (c), a person who overdrives, overloads, drives when overloaded, overworks, tortures, torments, deprives of necessary sustenance, drink, or shelter, cruelly beats, mutilates, or cruelly kills an animal, or causes or procures an animal to be so overdriven, overloaded, driven when overloaded, overworked, tortured, tormented, deprived of necessary sustenance, drink, shelter, or to be cruelly beaten, mutilated, or cruelly killed; and whoever, having the charge or custody of an animal, either as owner or otherwise, subjects an animal to needless suffering, or inflicts unnecessary cruelty upon the animal, or in any manner abuses an animal, or fails to provide the animal with proper food, drink, or shelter, or protection from the weather, or who drives, rides, or otherwise uses the animal when unfit for labor, is, for each offense, guilty of a crime punishable pursuant to subdivision (d).
(c)A person who maliciously and intentionally maims, mutilates, or tortures a mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish, as described in subdivision (e), is guilty of a crime punishable pursuant to subdivision (d).
(d) A violation of subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is punishable as a felony by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170, or by a fine of not more than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment, or alternatively, as a misdemeanor by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine of not more than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment.
(e)(1)Subdivision (c) applies to any mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish which is a creature described as follows:
(A)Endangered species or threatened species as described in Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code.
(B)Fully protected birds described in Section 3511 of the Fish and Game Code.
(C)Fully protected mammals described in Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 4700) of Part 3 of Division 4 of the Fish and Game Code.
(D)Fully protected reptiles and amphibians described in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 5050) of Division 5 of the Fish and Game Code.
(E)Fully protected fish as described in Section 5515 of the Fish and Game Code.
(2)This subdivision does not supersede or affect any law relating to taking of the described species, including, but not limited to, Section 12008 of the Fish and Game Code.
(f)For the purposes of subdivision (c), each act of malicious and intentional maiming, mutilating, or torturing a separate specimen of a creature described in subdivision (e) is a separate offense. If a person is charged with a violation of subdivision (c), the proceedings shall be subject to Section 12157 of the Fish and Game Code.
(g)(1)Upon the conviction of a person charged with a violation of this section by causing or permitting an act of cruelty, as defined in Section 599b, all animals lawfully seized and impounded with respect to the violation by a peace officer, officer of a humane society, or officer of a pound or animal regulation department of a public agency shall be adjudged by the court to be forfeited and shall thereupon be awarded to the impounding officer for proper disposition. A person convicted of a violation of this section by causing or permitting an act of cruelty, as defined in Section 599b, shall be liable to the impounding officer for all costs of impoundment from the time of seizure to the time of proper disposition.
(2)Mandatory seizure or impoundment shall not apply to animals in properly conducted scientific experiments or investigations performed under the authority of the faculty of a regularly incorporated medical college or university of this state.
SEC. 5.Section 597.1 of the Penal Code is amended to read:597.1.(a)(1)Every owner, driver, or keeper of any animal who permits the animal to be in any building, enclosure, lane, street, square, or lot of any city, county, city and county, or judicial district without proper care and attention is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding six months, by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment. Any peace officer, humane society officer, or animal control officer shall take possession of the stray or abandoned animal and shall provide care and treatment for the animal until the animal is deemed to be in suitable condition to be returned to the owner. When the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that very prompt action is required to protect the health or safety of the animal or the health or safety of others, the officer shall immediately seize the animal and comply with subdivision (f). In all other cases, the officer shall comply with the provisions of subdivision (g). The full cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized under this subdivision or pursuant to a search warrant shall constitute a lien on the animal and the animal shall not be returned to its owner until the charges are paid, if the seizure is upheld pursuant to this section.
(2)Notwithstanding any other law, if an animal control officer or humane officer, when necessary to protect the health and safety of a wild, stray, or abandoned animal or the health and safety of others, seeks to administer a tranquilizer that contains a controlled substance, as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code, to gain control of that animal, he or she may possess and administer that tranquilizer with direct or indirect supervision as determined by a licensed veterinarian, provided that the officer has met each of the following requirements:
(A)Has received training in the administration of tranquilizers from a licensed veterinarian. The training shall be approved by the California Veterinary Medical Board.
(B)Has successfully completed the firearms component of a course relating to the exercise of police powers, as set forth in Section 832.
(C)Is authorized by his or her agency or organization to possess and administer the tranquilizer in accordance with a policy established by the agency or organization and approved by the veterinarian who obtained the controlled substance.
(D)Has successfully completed the euthanasia training set forth in Section 2039 of Title 16 of the California Code of Regulations.
(E)Has completed a state and federal fingerprinting background check and does not have any drug- or alcohol-related convictions.
(b)Every sick, disabled, infirm, or crippled animal, except a dog or cat, that is abandoned in any city, county, city and county, or judicial district may be killed by the officer if, after a reasonable search, no owner of the animal can be found. It shall be the duty of all peace officers, humane society officers, and animal control officers to cause the animal to be killed or rehabilitated and placed in a suitable home on information that the animal is stray or abandoned. The officer may likewise take charge of any animal, including a dog or cat, that by reason of lameness, sickness, feebleness, or neglect, is unfit for the labor it is performing, or that in any other manner is being cruelly treated, and provide care and treatment for the animal until it is deemed to be in a suitable condition to be returned to the owner. When the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that very prompt action is required to protect the health or safety of an animal or the health or safety of others, the officer shall immediately seize the animal and comply with subdivision (f). In all other cases, the officer shall comply with subdivision (g). The full cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized under this subdivision or pursuant to a search warrant shall constitute a lien on the animal and the animal shall not be returned to its owner until the charges are paid.
(c)(1)A peace officer, humane society officer, or animal control officer shall convey all injured cats and dogs found without their owners in a public place directly to a veterinarian known by the officer to be a veterinarian who ordinarily treats dogs and cats for a determination of whether the animal shall be immediately and humanely destroyed or shall be hospitalized under proper care and given emergency treatment.
(2)If the owner does not redeem the animal within the locally prescribed waiting period, the veterinarian may personally perform euthanasia on the animal. If the animal is treated and recovers from its injuries, the veterinarian may keep the animal for purposes of adoption, provided the responsible animal control agency has first been contacted and has refused to take possession of the animal.
(3)When an animal is transferred to a veterinarian in a clinic, such as an emergency clinic that is not in continuous operation, the veterinarian may, in turn, transfer the animal to an appropriate facility.
(4)If the veterinarian determines that the animal shall be hospitalized under proper care and given emergency treatment, the costs of any services that are provided pending the owners inquiry to the responsible agency, department, or society shall be paid from the dog license fees, fines, and fees for impounding dogs in the city, county, or city and county in which the animal was licensed or, if the animal is unlicensed, shall be paid by the jurisdiction in which the animal was found, subject to the provision that this cost be repaid by the animals owner. The full cost of caring for and treating any animal seized under this subdivision shall constitute a lien on the animal and the animal shall not be returned to the owner until the charges are paid. A veterinarian shall not be criminally or civilly liable for any decision that he or she makes or for services that he or she provides pursuant to this subdivision.
(d)An animal control agency that takes possession of an animal pursuant to subdivision (c) shall keep records of the whereabouts of the animal from the time of possession to the end of the animals impoundment, and those records shall be available for inspection by the public, upon request, for three years after the date the animals impoundment ended.
(e)Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, a peace officer, humane society officer, or an animal control officer may, with the approval of his or her immediate superior, humanely destroy any stray or abandoned animal in the field when the animal is too severely injured to move or where a veterinarian is not available and it would be more humane to euthanize the animal.
(f)When an officer authorized under this section seizes or impounds an animal based on a reasonable belief that prompt action is required to protect the health or safety of the animal or the health or safety of others, the officer shall, prior to the commencement of any criminal proceedings authorized by this section, provide the owner or keeper of the animal, if known or ascertainable after reasonable investigation, with the opportunity for a postseizure hearing to determine the validity of the seizure or impoundment, or both.
(1)The agency shall cause a notice to be affixed to a conspicuous place where the animal was situated or personally deliver a notice of the seizure or impoundment, or both, to the owner or keeper within 48 hours, excluding weekends and holidays. The notice shall include all of the following:
(A)The name, business address, and telephone number of the officer providing the notice.
(B)A description of the animal seized, including any identification upon the animal.
(C)The authority and purpose for the seizure or impoundment, including the time, place, and circumstances under which the animal was seized.
(D)A statement that, in order to receive a postseizure hearing, the owner or person authorized to keep the animal, or his or her agent, shall request the hearing by signing and returning an enclosed declaration of ownership or right to keep the animal to the agency providing the notice within 10 days, including weekends and holidays, of the date of the notice. The declaration may be returned by personal delivery or mail.
(E)A statement that the full cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized under this section is a lien on the animal and that the animal shall not be returned to the owner until the charges are paid, and that failure to request or to attend a scheduled hearing shall result in liability for this cost.
(2)The postseizure hearing shall be conducted within 48 hours of the request, excluding weekends and holidays. The seizing agency may authorize its own officer or employee to conduct the hearing if the hearing officer is not the same person who directed the seizure or impoundment of the animal and is not junior in rank to that person. The agency may utilize the services of a hearing officer from outside the agency for the purposes of complying with this section.
(3)Failure of the owner or keeper, or of his or her agent, to request or to attend a scheduled hearing shall result in a forfeiture of any right to a postseizure hearing or right to challenge his or her liability for costs incurred.
(4)The agency, department, or society employing the person who directed the seizure shall be responsible for the costs incurred for caring and treating the animal, if it is determined in the postseizure hearing that the seizing officer did not have reasonable grounds to believe very prompt action, including seizure of the animal, was required to protect the health or safety of the animal or the health or safety of others. If it is determined the seizure was justified, the owner or keeper shall be personally liable to the seizing agency for the full cost of the seizure and care of the animal. The charges for the seizure and care of the animal shall be a lien on the animal. The animal shall not be returned to its owner until the charges are paid and the owner demonstrates to the satisfaction of the seizing agency or the hearing officer that the owner can and will provide the necessary care for the animal.
(g)When the need for immediate seizure is not present and prior to the commencement of any criminal proceedings authorized by this section, the agency shall provide the owner or keeper of the animal, if known or ascertainable after reasonable investigation, with the opportunity for a hearing prior to any seizure or impoundment of the animal. The owner shall produce the animal at the time of the hearing unless, prior to the hearing, the owner has made arrangements with the agency to view the animal upon request of the agency, or unless the owner can provide verification that the animal was humanely destroyed. Any person who willfully fails to produce the animal or provide the verification is guilty of an infraction, punishable by a fine of not less than two hundred fifty dollars ($250) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).
(1)The agency shall cause a notice to be affixed to a conspicuous place where the animal was situated or personally deliver a notice stating the grounds for believing the animal should be seized under subdivision (a) or (b). The notice shall include all of the following:
(A)The name, business address, and telephone number of the officer providing the notice.
(B)A description of the animal to be seized, including any identification upon the animal.
(C)The authority and purpose for the possible seizure or impoundment.
(D)A statement that, in order to receive a hearing prior to any seizure, the owner or person authorized to keep the animal, or his or her agent, shall request the hearing by signing and returning the enclosed declaration of ownership or right to keep the animal to the officer providing the notice within two days, excluding weekends and holidays, of the date of the notice.
(E)A statement that the cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized under this section is a lien on the animal, that any animal seized shall not be returned to the owner until the charges are paid, and that failure to request or to attend a scheduled hearing shall result in a conclusive determination that the animal may properly be seized and that the owner shall be liable for the charges.
(2)The preseizure hearing shall be conducted within 48 hours, excluding weekends and holidays, after receipt of the request. The seizing agency may authorize its own officer or employee to conduct the hearing if the hearing officer is not the same person who requests the seizure or impoundment of the animal and is not junior in rank to that person. The agency may utilize the services of a hearing officer from outside the agency for the purposes of complying with this section.
(3)Failure of the owner or keeper, or his or her agent, to request or to attend a scheduled hearing shall result in a forfeiture of any right to a preseizure hearing or right to challenge his or her liability for costs incurred pursuant to this section.
(4)The hearing officer, after the hearing, may affirm or deny the owners or keepers right to custody of the animal and, if reasonable grounds are established, may order the seizure or impoundment of the animal for care and treatment.
(h)When an animal is properly seized under this section or pursuant to a search warrant, the owner or keeper shall be personally liable to the seizing agency for the cost of the seizure and care of the animal. Further, if the charges for the seizure or impoundment and any other charges permitted under this section are not paid within 14 days of the seizure, or if the owner, within 14 days of notice of availability of the animal to be returned, fails to pay charges permitted under this section and take possession of the animal, the animal shall be deemed to have been abandoned and may be disposed of by the seizing agency.
(i)If the animal requires veterinary care and the humane society or public agency is not assured, within 14 days of the seizure of the animal, that the owner will provide the necessary care, the animal shall not be returned to its owner and shall be deemed to have been abandoned and may be disposed of by the seizing agency. A veterinarian may humanely destroy an impounded animal without regard to the prescribed holding period when it has been determined that the animal has incurred severe injuries or is incurably crippled. A veterinarian also may immediately humanely destroy an impounded animal afflicted with a serious contagious disease unless the owner or his or her agent immediately authorizes treatment of the animal by a veterinarian at the expense of the owner or agent.
(j)An animal properly seized under this section or pursuant to a search warrant shall not be returned to its owner until the owner can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the seizing agency or hearing officer that the owner can and will provide the necessary care for the animal.
(k)(1)In the case of cats and dogs, prior to the final disposition of any criminal charges, the seizing agency or prosecuting attorney may file a petition in a criminal action requesting that, prior to that final disposition, the court issue an order forfeiting the animal to the city, county, or seizing agency. The petitioner shall serve a true copy of the petition upon the defendant and the prosecuting attorney.
(2)Upon receipt of the petition, the court shall set a hearing on the petition. The hearing shall be conducted within 14 days after the filing of the petition, or as soon as practicable.
(3)The petitioner shall have the burden of establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that, even in the event of an acquittal of the criminal charges, the owner will not legally be permitted to retain the animal in question. If the court finds that the petitioner has met its burden, the court shall order the immediate forfeiture of the animal as sought by the petition.
(4)This subdivision does not authorize a seizing agency or prosecuting attorney to file a petition to determine an owners ability to legally retain an animal pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (l) if a petition has previously been filed pursuant to this subdivision.
(l)(1)Upon the conviction of a person charged with a violation of this section, or Section 597 or 597a, all animals lawfully seized and impounded with respect to the violation shall be adjudged by the court to be forfeited and shall thereupon be transferred to the impounding officer or appropriate public entity for proper adoption or other disposition. A person convicted of a violation of this section shall be personally liable to the seizing agency for all costs of impoundment from the time of seizure to the time of proper disposition. Upon conviction, the court shall order the convicted person to make payment to the appropriate public entity for the costs incurred in the housing, care, feeding, and treatment of the seized or impounded animals. Each person convicted in connection with a particular animal may be held jointly and severally liable for restitution for that particular animal. The payment shall be in addition to any other fine or sentence ordered by the court.
(2)The court may also order, as a condition of probation, that the convicted person be prohibited from owning, possessing, caring for, or residing with, animals of any kind, and require the convicted person to immediately deliver all animals in his or her possession to a designated public entity for adoption or other lawful disposition or provide proof to the court that the person no longer has possession, care, or control of any animals. In the event of the acquittal or final discharge without conviction of the person charged, if the animal is still impounded, the animal has not been previously deemed abandoned pursuant to subdivision (h), the court has not ordered that the animal be forfeited pursuant to subdivision (k), the court shall, on demand, direct the release of seized or impounded animals to the defendant upon a showing of proof of ownership.
(3)Any questions regarding ownership shall be determined in a separate hearing by the court where the criminal case was finally adjudicated and the court shall hear testimony from any persons who may assist the court in determining ownership of the animal. If the owner is determined to be unknown or the owner is prohibited or unable to retain possession of the animals for any reason, the court shall order the animals to be released to the appropriate public entity for adoption or other lawful disposition. This section is not intended to cause the release of any animal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish seized or impounded pursuant to any other statute, ordinance, or municipal regulation. This section shall not prohibit the seizure or impoundment of animals as evidence as provided for under any other law.
(m)It shall be the duty of all peace officers, humane society officers, and animal control officers to use all currently acceptable methods of identification, both electronic and otherwise, to determine the lawful owner or caretaker of any seized or impounded animal. It shall also be their duty to make reasonable efforts to notify the owner or caretaker of the whereabouts of the animal and any procedures available for the lawful recovery of the animal and, upon the owners and caretakers initiation of recovery procedures, retain custody of the animal for a reasonable period of time to allow for completion of the recovery process. Efforts to locate or contact the owner or caretaker and communications with persons claiming to be the owner or caretaker shall be recorded and maintained and be made available for public inspection.
SEC. 6.Section 597f of the Penal Code is amended to read:597f.(a)Every owner, driver, or possessor of any animal, who permits the animal to be in any building, enclosure, lane, street, square, or lot, of any city, city and county, or judicial district, without proper care and attention, shall, on conviction, be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding six months, by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment. It shall be the duty of any peace officer, officer of the humane society, or officer of a pound or animal regulation department of a public agency, to take possession of the animal so abandoned or neglected and care for the animal until it is redeemed by the owner or claimant, and the cost of caring for the animal shall be a lien on the animal until the charges are paid. Every sick, disabled, infirm, or crippled animal, except a dog or cat, abandoned in a city, city and county, or judicial district, may, if after due search no owner can be found therefor, be killed by the officer. It shall be the duty of all peace officers, an officer of a humane society, or officer of a pound or animal regulation department of a public agency to cause the animal to be killed on information of abandonment. The officer may likewise take charge of any animal, including a dog or cat, that, by reason of lameness, sickness, feebleness, or neglect, is unfit for the labor it is performing, or that in any other manner is being cruelly treated and, if the animal is not then in the custody of its owner, the officer shall give notice thereof to the owner, if known, and may provide suitable care for the animal until it is deemed to be in a suitable condition to be delivered to the owner. Any necessary expenses that are incurred for taking care of and keeping the animal shall be a lien on the animal, to be paid before the animal can be lawfully recovered.
(b)(1)It is the duty of all officers of pounds or humane societies, and animal regulation departments of public agencies to convey, and for police and sheriff departments, to cause to be conveyed all injured cats and dogs found without their owners in a public place directly to a veterinarian known by the officer or agency to be a veterinarian that ordinarily treats dogs and cats for a determination of whether the animal shall be immediately and humanely destroyed or shall be hospitalized under proper care and given emergency treatment.
(2)If the owner does not redeem the animal within the locally prescribed waiting period, the veterinarian may personally perform euthanasia on the animal, or, if the animal is treated and recovers from its injuries, the veterinarian may keep the animal for purposes of adoption, provided the responsible animal control agency has first been contacted and has refused to take possession of the animal.
(3)When an animal is transferred pursuant to this subdivision to a veterinarian in a clinic, such as an emergency clinic that is not in continuous operation, the veterinarian may, in turn, transfer the animal to an appropriate facility.
(4)If the veterinarian determines that the animal shall be hospitalized under proper care and given emergency treatment, the costs of any services that are provided pending the owners inquiry to the agency, department, or society shall be paid from the dog license fees, fines, and fees for impounding dogs in the city, county, or city and county in which the animal was licensed or, if the animal is unlicensed, the jurisdiction in which the animal was found, subject to the provision that this cost be repaid by the animals owner. A veterinarian shall not be criminally or civilly liable for any decision that he or she makes or services that he or she provides pursuant to this section.
(c)An animal control agency that takes possession of an animal pursuant to subdivision (b), shall keep records of the whereabouts of the animal for a 72-hour period from the time of possession and those records shall be available to inspection by the public upon request.
(d)Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, any officer of a pound or animal regulation department or humane society, or any officer of a police or sheriffs department may, with the approval of his or her immediate superior, humanely destroy any abandoned animal in the field when the animal is too severely injured to move or when a veterinarian is not available and it would be more humane to dispose of the animal.
SEC. 7.Section 600 of the Penal Code is amended to read:600.(a)A person who willfully and maliciously and with no legal justification strikes, beats, kicks, cuts, stabs, shoots with a firearm, administers any poison or other harmful or stupefying substance to, or throws, hurls, or projects at, or places any rock, object, or other substance that is used in a manner capable of producing injury and likely to produce injury, on or in the path of, a horse being used by, or a dog under the supervision of, a peace officer in the discharge or attempted discharge of his or her duties, or a volunteer who is acting under the direct supervision of a peace officer in the discharge or attempted discharge of his or her assigned volunteer duties, is guilty of a public offense. If the injury inflicted is a serious injury, as described in subdivision (c), the person shall be punished by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for 16 months, or two or three years, or in a county jail for not exceeding one year, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both a fine and imprisonment. If the injury inflicted is not a serious injury, the person shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for not exceeding one year, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both a fine and imprisonment.
(b)A person who willfully and maliciously and with no legal justification interferes with or obstructs a horse or dog being used by a peace officer in the discharge or attempted discharge of his or her duties, or a volunteer who is acting under the direct supervision of a peace officer in the discharge or attempted discharge of his or her assigned volunteer duties, by frightening, teasing, agitating, harassing, or hindering the horse or dog shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for not exceeding one year, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both a fine and imprisonment.
(c)A person who, in violation of this section, and with intent to inflict that injury or death, personally causes the death, destruction, or serious physical injury including bone fracture, loss or impairment of function of any bodily member, wounds requiring extensive suturing, or serious crippling, of a horse or dog, shall, upon conviction of a felony under this section, in addition and consecutive to the punishment prescribed for the felony, be punished by an additional term of imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for one year.
(d)A person who, in violation of this section, and with the intent to inflict that injury, personally causes great bodily injury, as defined in Section 12022.7, to any person not an accomplice, shall, upon conviction of a felony under this section, in addition and consecutive to the punishment prescribed for the felony, be punished by an additional term of imprisonment in the state prison for two years unless the conduct described in this subdivision is an element of any other offense of which the person is convicted or receives an enhancement under Section 12022.7.
(e)A defendant convicted of a violation of this section shall be ordered to make restitution to the agency owning the animal and employing the peace officer, to a volunteer who is acting under the direct supervision of a peace officer who is using his or her horse or supervising his or her dog in the performance of his or her assigned duties, or to the agency that provides, or the individual who provides, veterinary health care coverage or veterinary care for a horse or dog being used by, or under the supervision of, a volunteer who is acting under the direct supervision of a peace officer for any veterinary bills, replacement costs of the animal if it is disabled or killed, and, if applicable, the salary of the peace officer for the period of time his or her services are lost to the agency.
SEC. 8.Section 600.7 is added to the Penal Code, to read:600.7.(a)Every defendant who is granted probation for an offense specified in subdivision (c) shall be ordered to pay for and complete the responsible animal owner education course described in subdivision (b). If the court finds that the defendant is financially unable to pay for the course, the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based upon the defendants ability to pay.
(b)(1)The responsible animal owner education course for persons convicted of an offense specified in subdivision (c) may be conducted online or in person, or in a combination of both, and shall consist of all of the following:
(A)A minimum of five instructional hours.
(B)Mechanisms to ensure the minimum hours of instruction have been completed by the participant.
(C)Attendance shall be verified. If the course is completed online, the course provider shall maintain a system to validate the identity of the person taking the course.
(D)The course provider shall incorporate a validation process that verifies participant comprehension of course material related to the educational objectives as follows:
(i)The course provider shall test the participants mastery of the course content by asking at least two questions from each major unit or section. The questions shall be multiple choice.
(ii)The questions shall be difficult enough that the answer may not be easily determined without having viewed the contents of the major unit or section.
(2)The educational objectives of the responsible animal owner course shall include, but not be limited to, promotion of all of the following:
(A)Responsible care concepts for animals, both livestock and nonlivestock, including instruction on providing for the health, safety, and welfare of livestock and nonlivestock animals and wildlife, including appropriate shelter and housing, the importance of spaying and neutering, and the proper tethering and transportation of animals.
(B)Responsible pet ownership, including, but not limited to, ensuring the safety of both the community and the animal and bite prevention.
(C)Respect and observance of federal and state laws that protect livestock and nonlivestock animals and wildlife.
(D)An overview of state and federal laws related to cruelty to livestock and nonlivestock animals and animal fighting.
(E)Appropriate training and discipline tactics for livestock and nonlivestock animals.
(3)All responsible owner education courses for persons convicted of an offense specified in subdivision (c) shall be reviewed and certified by the State Department of Health Care Services. Each application for course certification shall be accompanied by a course outline that identifies the educational objectives outlined in paragraph (2) and the amount of time allotted for each educational objective.(c)This section applies to a conviction for any of the following offenses:
(1)Section 286.5.
(2)Section 596.
(3)Section 596.5.
(4)Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 597.
(5)Paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 597.1.
(6)Subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 597.5.
(7)Section 597.6.
(8)Section 597.7.
(9)Section 597a.
(10)Section 597b.
(11)Section 597c.
(12)Section 597f.
(13)Section 597g.
(14)Section 597h.
(15)Section 597i.
(16)Section 597j.
(17)Section 597k.
(18)Section 597m.
(19)Section 597n.
(20)Section 597s.
(21)Section 597t.
(22)Section 597u.
(23)Section 597v.
(24)Section 597x.
(25)Section 597z.
(26)Section 599f.
(27)Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 600.
(28)Section 600.2.
(29)Section 600.5.
SEC. 9.Section 600.8 is added to the Penal Code, to read:600.8.(a)Every defendant who is granted probation for an offense specified in subdivision (b) shall be subject to a mandatory mental health evaluation by the county mental health department or another an evaluator chosen by the court. Upon evaluation, if the evaluating mental health professional deems it necessary, the defendant shall complete mandatory counseling. Mental health evaluations and any subsequent treatment shall be paid for by the defendant. If the court finds that the defendant is financially unable to pay for that counseling, the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based upon the defendants ability to pay.
(b)This section applies to a conviction for any of the following offenses:
(1)Section 286.5.
(2)Section 596.
(3)Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 597.
(4)Paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 597.1.
(5)Section 597f.
(6)Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 600.
(7)Section 600.2.
(8)Section 600.5.
SEC. 10.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution for certain costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district because, in that regard, this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.However, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains other costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.SEC. 10.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
This act shall be known, and may be cited, as the Animal Cruelty and Violence Intervention Act of 2018.
SEC. 2.Section 286.5 of the Penal Code is amended to read:286.5.Any A person who sexually assaults any an animal protected by Section 597f for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of the person is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding six months, by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment.
SEC. 3.Section 596 of the Penal Code is amended to read:596.(a)Every A person who, without the consent of the owner, wilfully willfully administers poison to any an animal, the property of another, or exposes any a poisonous substance, with the intent that the same shall be taken or swallowed by any such an animal, is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding six months, by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment.
(b)However, the provisions of this section shall this section does not apply in the case of when a person who exposes poisonous substances upon premises or property owned or controlled by him or her for the purpose of controlling or destroying predatory animals or livestock-killing dogs and if, prior to or during the placing out of the poisonous substances, he or she shall have posted upon the property conspicuous signs located at intervals of distance not greater than one-third of a mile apart, and in any case not less than three signs having words with letters at least one inch high reading WarningPoisoned bait placed out on these premises, which signs shall be kept in place until the poisonous substances have been removed. Whenever When these signs have been conspicuously located upon the property or premises owned or controlled by him or her as required by this section, that person shall not be charged with any civil liability to another party in the event that any domestic animal belonging to that party becomes injured or killed by trespassing or partaking of the poisonous substance or substances so placed.
SEC. 4.Section 597 of the Penal Code is amended to read:597.(a)Except as provided in subdivision (c) of this section or Section 599c, every a person who maliciously and intentionally maims, mutilates, tortures, or wounds a living animal, or maliciously and intentionally kills an animal, is guilty of a crime punishable pursuant to subdivision (d).
(b)Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (a) or (c), every a person who overdrives, overloads, drives when overloaded, overworks, tortures, torments, deprives of necessary sustenance, drink, or shelter, cruelly beats, mutilates, or cruelly kills an animal, or causes or procures an animal to be so overdriven, overloaded, driven when overloaded, overworked, tortured, tormented, deprived of necessary sustenance, drink, shelter, or to be cruelly beaten, mutilated, or cruelly killed; and whoever, having the charge or custody of an animal, either as owner or otherwise, subjects an animal to needless suffering, or inflicts unnecessary cruelty upon the animal, or in any manner abuses an animal, or fails to provide the animal with proper food, drink, or shelter, or protection from the weather, or who drives, rides, or otherwise uses the animal when unfit for labor, is, for each offense, guilty of a crime punishable pursuant to subdivision (d).
(c)Every A person who maliciously and intentionally maims, mutilates, or tortures a mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish, as described in subdivision (e), is guilty of a crime punishable pursuant to subdivision (d).
(d) A violation of subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is punishable as a felony by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170, or by a fine of not more than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment, or alternatively, as a misdemeanor by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine of not more than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment.
(e)(1)Subdivision (c) applies to any mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish which is a creature described as follows:
(A)Endangered species or threatened species as described in Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code.
(B)Fully protected birds described in Section 3511 of the Fish and Game Code.
(C)Fully protected mammals described in Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 4700) of Part 3 of Division 4 of the Fish and Game Code.
(D)Fully protected reptiles and amphibians described in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 5050) of Division 5 of the Fish and Game Code.
(E)Fully protected fish as described in Section 5515 of the Fish and Game Code.
(2)This subdivision does not supersede or affect any law relating to taking of the described species, including, but not limited to, Section 12008 of the Fish and Game Code.
(f)For the purposes of subdivision (c), each act of malicious and intentional maiming, mutilating, or torturing a separate specimen of a creature described in subdivision (e) is a separate offense. If a person is charged with a violation of subdivision (c), the proceedings shall be subject to Section 12157 of the Fish and Game Code.
(g)(1)Upon the conviction of a person charged with a violation of this section by causing or permitting an act of cruelty, as defined in Section 599b, all animals lawfully seized and impounded with respect to the violation by a peace officer, officer of a humane society, or officer of a pound or animal regulation department of a public agency shall be adjudged by the court to be forfeited and shall thereupon be awarded to the impounding officer for proper disposition. A person convicted of a violation of this section by causing or permitting an act of cruelty, as defined in Section 599b, shall be liable to the impounding officer for all costs of impoundment from the time of seizure to the time of proper disposition.
(2)Mandatory seizure or impoundment shall not apply to animals in properly conducted scientific experiments or investigations performed under the authority of the faculty of a regularly incorporated medical college or university of this state.
SEC. 5.Section 597.1 of the Penal Code is amended to read:597.1.(a)(1)Every owner, driver, or keeper of any animal who permits the animal to be in any building, enclosure, lane, street, square, or lot of any city, county, city and county, or judicial district without proper care and attention is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding six months, by a fine not to exceed exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment. Any peace officer, humane society officer, or animal control officer shall take possession of the stray or abandoned animal and shall provide care and treatment for the animal until the animal is deemed to be in suitable condition to be returned to the owner. When the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that very prompt action is required to protect the health or safety of the animal or the health or safety of others, the officer shall immediately seize the animal and comply with subdivision (f). In all other cases, the officer shall comply with the provisions of subdivision (g). The full cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized under this subdivision or pursuant to a search warrant shall constitute a lien on the animal and the animal shall not be returned to its owner until the charges are paid, if the seizure is upheld pursuant to this section.
(2)Notwithstanding any other law, if an animal control officer or humane officer, when necessary to protect the health and safety of a wild, stray, or abandoned animal or the health and safety of others, seeks to administer a tranquilizer that contains a controlled substance, as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code, to gain control of that animal, he or she may possess and administer that tranquilizer with direct or indirect supervision as determined by a licensed veterinarian, provided that the officer has met each of the following requirements:
(A)Has received training in the administration of tranquilizers from a licensed veterinarian. The training shall be approved by the California Veterinary Medical Board.
(B)Has successfully completed the firearms component of a course relating to the exercise of police powers, as set forth in Section 832.
(C)Is authorized by his or her agency or organization to possess and administer the tranquilizer in accordance with a policy established by the agency or organization and approved by the veterinarian who obtained the controlled substance.
(D)Has successfully completed the euthanasia training set forth in Section 2039 of Title 16 of the California Code of Regulations.
(E)Has completed a state and federal fingerprinting background check and does not have any drug- or alcohol-related convictions.
(b)Every sick, disabled, infirm, or crippled animal, except a dog or cat, that is abandoned in any city, county, city and county, or judicial district may be killed by the officer if, after a reasonable search, no owner of the animal can be found. It shall be the duty of all peace officers, humane society officers, and animal control officers to cause the animal to be killed or rehabilitated and placed in a suitable home on information that the animal is stray or abandoned. The officer may likewise take charge of any animal, including a dog or cat, that by reason of lameness, sickness, feebleness, or neglect, is unfit for the labor it is performing, or that in any other manner is being cruelly treated, and provide care and treatment for the animal until it is deemed to be in a suitable condition to be returned to the owner. When the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that very prompt action is required to protect the health or safety of an animal or the health or safety of others, the officer shall immediately seize the animal and comply with subdivision (f). In all other cases, the officer shall comply with subdivision (g). The full cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized under this subdivision or pursuant to a search warrant shall constitute a lien on the animal and the animal shall not be returned to its owner until the charges are paid.
(c)(1)Any A peace officer, humane society officer, or animal control officer shall convey all injured cats and dogs found without their owners in a public place directly to a veterinarian known by the officer to be a veterinarian who ordinarily treats dogs and cats for a determination of whether the animal shall be immediately and humanely destroyed or shall be hospitalized under proper care and given emergency treatment.
(2)If the owner does not redeem the animal within the locally prescribed waiting period, the veterinarian may personally perform euthanasia on the animal. If the animal is treated and recovers from its injuries, the veterinarian may keep the animal for purposes of adoption, provided the responsible animal control agency has first been contacted and has refused to take possession of the animal.
(3)Whenever any When an animal is transferred to a veterinarian in a clinic, such as an emergency clinic that is not in continuous operation, the veterinarian may, in turn, transfer the animal to an appropriate facility.
(4)If the veterinarian determines that the animal shall be hospitalized under proper care and given emergency treatment, the costs of any services that are provided pending the owners inquiry to the responsible agency, department, or society shall be paid from the dog license fees, fines, and fees for impounding dogs in the city, county, or city and county in which the animal was licensed or, if the animal is unlicensed, shall be paid by the jurisdiction in which the animal was found, subject to the provision that this cost be repaid by the animals owner. The full cost of caring for and treating any animal seized under this subdivision shall constitute a lien on the animal and the animal shall not be returned to the owner until the charges are paid. No A veterinarian shall not be criminally or civilly liable for any decision that he or she makes or for services that he or she provides pursuant to this subdivision.
(d)An animal control agency that takes possession of an animal pursuant to subdivision (c) shall keep records of the whereabouts of the animal from the time of possession to the end of the animals impoundment, and those records shall be available for inspection by the public upon request public, upon request, for three years after the date the animals impoundment ended.
(e)Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, any a peace officer, humane society officer, or any an animal control officer may, with the approval of his or her immediate superior, humanely destroy any stray or abandoned animal in the field in any case where when the animal is too severely injured to move or where a veterinarian is not available and it would be more humane to euthanize the animal.
(f)Whenever When an officer authorized under this section seizes or impounds an animal based on a reasonable belief that prompt action is required to protect the health or safety of the animal or the health or safety of others, the officer shall, prior to the commencement of any criminal proceedings authorized by this section, provide the owner or keeper of the animal, if known or ascertainable after reasonable investigation, with the opportunity for a postseizure hearing to determine the validity of the seizure or impoundment, or both.
(1)The agency shall cause a notice to be affixed to a conspicuous place where the animal was situated or personally deliver a notice of the seizure or impoundment, or both, to the owner or keeper within 48 hours, excluding weekends and holidays. The notice shall include all of the following:
(A)The name, business address, and telephone number of the officer providing the notice.
(B)A description of the animal seized, including any identification upon the animal.
(C)The authority and purpose for the seizure or impoundment, including the time, place, and circumstances under which the animal was seized.
(D)A statement that, in order to receive a postseizure hearing, the owner or person authorized to keep the animal, or his or her agent, shall request the hearing by signing and returning an enclosed declaration of ownership or right to keep the animal to the agency providing the notice within 10 days, including weekends and holidays, of the date of the notice. The declaration may be returned by personal delivery or mail.
(E)A statement that the full cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized under this section is a lien on the animal and that the animal shall not be returned to the owner until the charges are paid, and that failure to request or to attend a scheduled hearing shall result in liability for this cost.
(2)The postseizure hearing shall be conducted within 48 hours of the request, excluding weekends and holidays. The seizing agency may authorize its own officer or employee to conduct the hearing if the hearing officer is not the same person who directed the seizure or impoundment of the animal and is not junior in rank to that person. The agency may utilize the services of a hearing officer from outside the agency for the purposes of complying with this section.
(3)Failure of the owner or keeper, or of his or her agent, to request or to attend a scheduled hearing shall result in a forfeiture of any right to a postseizure hearing or right to challenge his or her liability for costs incurred.
(4)The agency, department, or society employing the person who directed the seizure shall be responsible for the costs incurred for caring and treating the animal, if it is determined in the postseizure hearing that the seizing officer did not have reasonable grounds to believe very prompt action, including seizure of the animal, was required to protect the health or safety of the animal or the health or safety of others. If it is determined the seizure was justified, the owner or keeper shall be personally liable to the seizing agency for the full cost of the seizure and care of the animal. The charges for the seizure and care of the animal shall be a lien on the animal. The animal shall not be returned to its owner until the charges are paid and the owner demonstrates to the satisfaction of the seizing agency or the hearing officer that the owner can and will provide the necessary care for the animal.
(g)Where When the need for immediate seizure is not present and prior to the commencement of any criminal proceedings authorized by this section, the agency shall provide the owner or keeper of the animal, if known or ascertainable after reasonable investigation, with the opportunity for a hearing prior to any seizure or impoundment of the animal. The owner shall produce the animal at the time of the hearing unless, prior to the hearing, the owner has made arrangements with the agency to view the animal upon request of the agency, or unless the owner can provide verification that the animal was humanely destroyed. Any person who willfully fails to produce the animal or provide the verification is guilty of an infraction, punishable by a fine of not less than two hundred fifty dollars ($250) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).
(1)The agency shall cause a notice to be affixed to a conspicuous place where the animal was situated or personally deliver a notice stating the grounds for believing the animal should be seized under subdivision (a) or (b). The notice shall include all of the following:
(A)The name, business address, and telephone number of the officer providing the notice.
(B)A description of the animal to be seized, including any identification upon the animal.
(C)The authority and purpose for the possible seizure or impoundment.
(D)A statement that, in order to receive a hearing prior to any seizure, the owner or person authorized to keep the animal, or his or her agent, shall request the hearing by signing and returning the enclosed declaration of ownership or right to keep the animal to the officer providing the notice within two days, excluding weekends and holidays, of the date of the notice.
(E)A statement that the cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized under this section is a lien on the animal, that any animal seized shall not be returned to the owner until the charges are paid, and that failure to request or to attend a scheduled hearing shall result in a conclusive determination that the animal may properly be seized and that the owner shall be liable for the charges.
(2)The preseizure hearing shall be conducted within 48 hours, excluding weekends and holidays, after receipt of the request. The seizing agency may authorize its own officer or employee to conduct the hearing if the hearing officer is not the same person who requests the seizure or impoundment of the animal and is not junior in rank to that person. The agency may utilize the services of a hearing officer from outside the agency for the purposes of complying with this section.
(3)Failure of the owner or keeper, or his or her agent, to request or to attend a scheduled hearing shall result in a forfeiture of any right to a preseizure hearing or right to challenge his or her liability for costs incurred pursuant to this section.
(4)The hearing officer, after the hearing, may affirm or deny the owners or keepers right to custody of the animal and, if reasonable grounds are established, may order the seizure or impoundment of the animal for care and treatment.
(h)If any When an animal is properly seized under this section or pursuant to a search warrant, the owner or keeper shall be personally liable to the seizing agency for the cost of the seizure and care of the animal. Further, if the charges for the seizure or impoundment and any other charges permitted under this section are not paid within 14 days of the seizure, or if the owner, within 14 days of notice of availability of the animal to be returned, fails to pay charges permitted under this section and take possession of the animal, the animal shall be deemed to have been abandoned and may be disposed of by the seizing agency.
(i)If the animal requires veterinary care and the humane society or public agency is not assured, within 14 days of the seizure of the animal, that the owner will provide the necessary care, the animal shall not be returned to its owner and shall be deemed to have been abandoned and may be disposed of by the seizing agency. A veterinarian may humanely destroy an impounded animal without regard to the prescribed holding period when it has been determined that the animal has incurred severe injuries or is incurably crippled. A veterinarian also may immediately humanely destroy an impounded animal afflicted with a serious contagious disease unless the owner or his or her agent immediately authorizes treatment of the animal by a veterinarian at the expense of the owner or agent.
(j)No An animal properly seized under this section or pursuant to a search warrant shall not be returned to its owner until the owner can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the seizing agency or hearing officer that the owner can and will provide the necessary care for the animal.
(k)(1)In the case of cats and dogs, prior to the final disposition of any criminal charges, the seizing agency or prosecuting attorney may file a petition in a criminal action requesting that, prior to that final disposition, the court issue an order forfeiting the animal to the city, county, or seizing agency. The petitioner shall serve a true copy of the petition upon the defendant and the prosecuting attorney.
(2)Upon receipt of the petition, the court shall set a hearing on the petition. The hearing shall be conducted within 14 days after the filing of the petition, or as soon as practicable.
(3)The petitioner shall have the burden of establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that, even in the event of an acquittal of the criminal charges, the owner will not legally be permitted to retain the animal in question. If the court finds that the petitioner has met its burden, the court shall order the immediate forfeiture of the animal as sought by the petition.
(4)Nothing in this subdivision is intended to This subdivision does not authorize a seizing agency or prosecuting attorney to file a petition to determine an owners ability to legally retain an animal pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (l) if a petition has previously been filed pursuant to this subdivision.
(l)(1)Upon the conviction of a person charged with a violation of this section, or Section 597 or 597a, all animals lawfully seized and impounded with respect to the violation shall be adjudged by the court to be forfeited and shall thereupon be transferred to the impounding officer or appropriate public entity for proper adoption or other disposition. A person convicted of a violation of this section shall be personally liable to the seizing agency for all costs of impoundment from the time of seizure to the time of proper disposition. Upon conviction, the court shall order the convicted person to make payment to the appropriate public entity for the costs incurred in the housing, care, feeding, and treatment of the seized or impounded animals. Each person convicted in connection with a particular animal may be held jointly and severally liable for restitution for that particular animal. The payment shall be in addition to any other fine or sentence ordered by the court.
(2)The court may also order, as a condition of probation, that the convicted person be prohibited from owning, possessing, caring for, or residing with, animals of any kind, and require the convicted person to immediately deliver all animals in his or her possession to a designated public entity for adoption or other lawful disposition or provide proof to the court that the person no longer has possession, care, or control of any animals. In the event of the acquittal or final discharge without conviction of the person charged, if the animal is still impounded, the animal has not been previously deemed abandoned pursuant to subdivision (h), the court has not ordered that the animal be forfeited pursuant to subdivision (k), the court shall, on demand, direct the release of seized or impounded animals to the defendant upon a showing of proof of ownership.
(3)Any questions regarding ownership shall be determined in a separate hearing by the court where the criminal case was finally adjudicated and the court shall hear testimony from any persons who may assist the court in determining ownership of the animal. If the owner is determined to be unknown or the owner is prohibited or unable to retain possession of the animals for any reason, the court shall order the animals to be released to the appropriate public entity for adoption or other lawful disposition. This section is not intended to cause the release of any animal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish seized or impounded pursuant to any other statute, ordinance, or municipal regulation. This section shall not prohibit the seizure or impoundment of animals as evidence as provided for under any other provision of law.
(m)It shall be the duty of all peace officers, humane society officers, and animal control officers to use all currently acceptable methods of identification, both electronic and otherwise, to determine the lawful owner or caretaker of any seized or impounded animal. It shall also be their duty to make reasonable efforts to notify the owner or caretaker of the whereabouts of the animal and any procedures available for the lawful recovery of the animal and, upon the owners and caretakers initiation of recovery procedures, retain custody of the animal for a reasonable period of time to allow for completion of the recovery process. Efforts to locate or contact the owner or caretaker and communications with persons claiming to be the owner or caretaker shall be recorded and maintained and be made available for public inspection.
SEC. 6.Section 597f of the Penal Code is amended to read:597f.(a)Every owner, driver, or possessor of any animal, who permits the animal to be in any building, enclosure, lane, street, square, or lot, of any city, city and county, or judicial district, without proper care and attention, shall, on conviction, be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding six months, by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment. And it It shall be the duty of any peace officer, officer of the humane society, or officer of a pound or animal regulation department of a public agency, to take possession of the animal so abandoned or neglected and care for the animal until it is redeemed by the owner or claimant, and the cost of caring for the animal shall be a lien on the animal until the charges are paid. Every sick, disabled, infirm, or crippled animal, except a dog or cat, which shall be abandoned in any a city, city and county, or judicial district, may, if after due search no owner can be found therefor, be killed by the officer. It shall be the duty of all peace officers, an officer of such a humane society, or officer of a pound or animal regulation department of a public agency to cause the animal to be killed on information of abandonment. The officer may likewise take charge of any animal, including a dog or cat, that that, by reason of lameness, sickness, feebleness, or neglect, is unfit for the labor it is performing, or that in any other manner is being cruelly treated and, if the animal is not then in the custody of its owner, the officer shall give notice thereof to the owner, if known, and may provide suitable care for the animal until it is deemed to be in a suitable condition to be delivered to the owner. Any necessary expenses which may be that are incurred for taking care of and keeping the animal shall be a lien thereon, on the animal, to be paid before the animal can be lawfully recovered.
(b)(1)It shall be is the duty of all officers of pounds or humane societies, and animal regulation departments of public agencies to convey, and for police and sheriff departments, to cause to be conveyed all injured cats and dogs found without their owners in a public place directly to a veterinarian known by the officer or agency to be a veterinarian that ordinarily treats dogs and cats for a determination of whether the animal shall be immediately and humanely destroyed or shall be hospitalized under proper care and given emergency treatment.
(2)If the owner does not redeem the animal within the locally prescribed waiting period, the veterinarian may personally perform euthanasia on the animal, or, if the animal is treated and recovers from its injuries, the veterinarian may keep the animal for purposes of adoption, provided the responsible animal control agency has first been contacted and has refused to take possession of the animal.
(3)Whenever any When an animal is transferred pursuant to this subdivision to a veterinarian in a clinic, such as an emergency clinic which that is not in continuous operation, the veterinarian may, in turn, transfer the animal to an appropriate facility.
(4)If the veterinarian determines that the animal shall be hospitalized under proper care and given emergency treatment, the costs of any services which that are provided pending the owners inquiry to the agency, department, or society shall be paid from the dog license fees, fines, and fees for impounding dogs in the city, county, or city and county in which the animal was licensed or if the animal is unlicensed or, if the animal is unlicensed, the jurisdiction in which the animal was found, subject to the provision that this cost be repaid by the animals owner. No A veterinarian shall not be criminally or civilly liable for any decision which that he or she makes or services which that he or she provides pursuant to this section.
(c)An animal control agency which that takes possession of an animal pursuant to subdivision (b), shall keep records of the whereabouts of the animal for a 72-hour period from the time of possession and those records shall be available to inspection by the public upon request.
(d)Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, any officer of a pound or animal regulation department or humane society, or any officer of a police or sheriffs department may, with the approval of his or her immediate superior, humanely destroy any abandoned animal in the field in any case where when the animal is too severely injured to move or where when a veterinarian is not available and it would be more humane to dispose of the animal.
SEC. 7.Section 600 of the Penal Code is amended to read:600.(a)Any A person who willfully and maliciously and with no legal justification strikes, beats, kicks, cuts, stabs, shoots with a firearm, administers any poison or other harmful or stupefying substance to, or throws, hurls, or projects at, or places any rock, object, or other substance which that is used in such a manner as to be capable of producing injury and likely to produce injury, on or in the path of, a horse being used by, or a dog under the supervision of, a peace officer in the discharge or attempted discharge of his or her duties, or a volunteer who is acting under the direct supervision of a peace officer in the discharge or attempted discharge of his or her assigned volunteer duties, is guilty of a public offense. If the injury inflicted is a serious injury, as described in subdivision (c), the person shall be punished by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for 16 months, or two or three years, or in a county jail for not exceeding one year, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both a fine and imprisonment. If the injury inflicted is not a serious injury, the person shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for not exceeding one year, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both a fine and imprisonment.
(b)Any A person who willfully and maliciously and with no legal justification interferes with or obstructs a horse or dog being used by a peace officer in the discharge or attempted discharge of his or her duties, or a volunteer who is acting under the direct supervision of a peace officer in the discharge or attempted discharge of his or her assigned volunteer duties, by frightening, teasing, agitating, harassing, or hindering the horse or dog shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for not exceeding one year, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both a fine and imprisonment.
(c)Any A person who, in violation of this section, and with intent to inflict that injury or death, personally causes the death, destruction, or serious physical injury including bone fracture, loss or impairment of function of any bodily member, wounds requiring extensive suturing, or serious crippling, of a horse or dog, shall, upon conviction of a felony under this section, in addition and consecutive to the punishment prescribed for the felony, be punished by an additional term of imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for one year.
(d)Any A person who, in violation of this section, and with the intent to inflict that injury, personally causes great bodily injury, as defined in Section 12022.7, to any person not an accomplice, shall, upon conviction of a felony under this section, in addition and consecutive to the punishment prescribed for the felony, be punished by an additional term of imprisonment in the state prison for two years unless the conduct described in this subdivision is an element of any other offense of which the person is convicted or receives an enhancement under Section 12022.7.
(e)A defendant convicted of a violation of this section shall be ordered to make restitution to the agency owning the animal and employing the peace officer, to a volunteer who is acting under the direct supervision of a peace officer who is using his or her horse or supervising his or her dog in the performance of his or her assigned duties, or to the agency that provides, or the individual who provides, veterinary health care coverage or veterinary care for a horse or dog being used by, or under the supervision of, a volunteer who is acting under the direct supervision of a peace officer for any veterinary bills, replacement costs of the animal if it is disabled or killed, and, if applicable, the salary of the peace officer for the period of time his or her services are lost to the agency.
SEC. 8.Section 600.7 is added to the Penal Code, to read:600.7.(a)Every defendant who is convicted of granted probation for an offense specified in subdivision (c) shall be ordered to pay for and complete the responsible animal owner education course described in subdivision (b). If the court finds that the defendant is financially unable to pay for the course, the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based upon the defendants ability to pay. An indigent defendant may negotiate a deferred payment schedule, but shall pay a nominal fee if the defendant has the ability to pay the nominal fee.
(b)(1)The responsible animal owner education course for persons convicted of an offense specified in subdivision (c) may be conducted online or in person, or in a combination of both, and shall consist of all of the following:
(A)A minimum of five instructional hours.
(B)Mechanisms to ensure the minimum hours of instruction have been completed by the participant.
(C)Attendance shall be verified. If the course is completed online, the course provider shall maintain a system to validate the identity of the person taking the course.
(D)The course provider shall incorporate a validation process that verifies participant comprehension of course material related to the educational objectives as follows:
(i)The course provider shall test the participants mastery of the course content by asking at least two questions from each major unit or section. The questions shall be multiple choice.
(ii)The questions shall be difficult enough that the answer may not be easily determined without having viewed the contents of the major unit or section.
(2)The educational objectives of the responsible animal owner course shall include, but not be limited to, promotion of all of the following:
(A)Responsible care concepts for animals, both livestock and nonlivestock, including instruction on providing for the health, safety, and welfare of livestock and nonlivestock animals and wildlife, including appropriate shelter and housing, the importance of spaying and neutering, and the proper tethering and transportation of animals.
(B)Responsible pet ownership, including, but not limited to, ensuring the safety of both the community and the animal and bite prevention.
(C)Respect and observance of federal and state laws that protect livestock and nonlivestock animals and wildlife.
(D)An overview of state and federal laws related to cruelty to livestock and nonlivestock animals and animal fighting.
(E)Appropriate training and discipline tactics for livestock and nonlivestock animals.
(3)All responsible owner education courses for persons convicted of an offense specified in subdivision (c) shall be reviewed and certified by the State Department of Health Care Services. Each application for course certification shall be accompanied by a course outline that identifies the educational objectives outlined in paragraph (2) and the amount of time allotted for each educational objective.
(c)This section applies to a conviction for any of the following offenses:
(1)Section 286.5.
(2)Section 596.
(3)Section 596.5.
(4)Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 597.
(5)Paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 597.1.
(6)Subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 597.5.
(7)Section 597.6.
(8)Section 597.7.
(9)Section 597a.
(10)Section 597b.
(11)Section 597c.
(12)Section 597f.
(13)Section 597g.
(14)Section 597h.
(15)Section 597i.
(16)Section 597j.
(17)Section 597k.
(18)Section 597m.
(19)Section 597n.
(20)Section 597s.
(21)Section 597t.
(22)Section 597u.
(23)Section 597v.
(24)Section 597x.
(25)Section 597z.
(26)Section 599f.
(27)Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 600.
(28)Section 600.2.
(29)Section 600.5.
SEC. 9.Section 600.8 is added to the Penal Code, to read:600.8.(a)(1)Every defendant who is convicted of granted probation for an offense specified in subdivision (b) shall be subject to a mandatory mental health evaluation. evaluation by the county mental health department or another evaluator chosen by the court. Upon evaluation, if the evaluating mental health professional deems it necessary, the defendant shall complete mandatory counseling. Mental health evaluations and any subsequent treatment shall be paid for by the defendant. If the court finds that the defendant is financially unable to pay for that counseling, the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based upon the defendants ability to pay. An indigent defendant may negotiate a deferred payment schedule, but shall pay a nominal fee if the defendant has the ability to pay the nominal fee.
(2)Mental health evaluation shall be completed within 90 days of the conviction or at the soonest time deemed appropriate by the court, unless the defendant is sentenced to imprisonment, in which case the mental health evaluation shall be completed within 90 days of release or at the soonest time deemed appropriate by the court. If the offender is referred to counseling, he or she shall begin counseling within 90 days or at the soonest time deemed appropriate by the court and shall submit proof of completion to the court.(3)Failure to complete these requirements shall result in the termination of any diversion program, probation, mandatory supervision, or postrelease community supervision.(b)This section applies to a conviction for any of the following offenses:
(1)Section 286.5.
(2)Section 596.
(3)Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 597.
(4)Paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 597.1.
(5)Section 597f.
(6)Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 600.
(7)Section 600.2.
(8)Section 600.5.
SEC. 10.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution for certain costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district because, in that regard, this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
However, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains other costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
This act shall be known, and may be cited, as the Animal Cruelty and Violence Intervention Act of 2018.
SEC. 2.Section 286.5 of the Penal Code is amended to read:286.5.Any person who sexually assaults any animal protected by Section 597f for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of the person is guilty of a misdemeanor. misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding six months, by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment.
SEC. 3.Section 596 of the Penal Code is amended to read:596.(a)Every person who, without the consent of the owner, wilfully administers poison to any animal, the property of another, or exposes any poisonous substance, with the intent that the same shall be taken or swallowed by any such animal, is guilty of a misdemeanor. misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding six months, by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment.
However,(b)However, the provisions of this section shall not apply in the case of a person who exposes poisonous substances upon premises or property owned or controlled by him or her for the purpose of controlling or destroying predatory animals or livestock-killing dogs and if, prior to or during the placing out of such the poisonous substances, he or she shall have posted upon the property conspicuous signs located at intervals of distance not greater than one-third of a mile apart, and in any case not less than three such signs having words with letters at least one inch high reading WarningPoisoned bait placed out on these premises, which signs shall be kept in place until the poisonous substances have been removed. Whenever such these signs have been conspicuously located upon the property or premises owned or controlled by him as hereinabove provided, such or her as required by this section, that person shall not be charged with any civil liability to another party in the event that any domestic animal belonging to such that party becomes injured or killed by trespassing or partaking of the poisonous substance or substances so placed.
SECTION 1.SEC. 4.Section 597 of the Penal Code is amended to read:597.(a)Except as provided in subdivision (c) of this section or Section 599c, every person who maliciously and intentionally maims, mutilates, tortures, or wounds a living animal, or maliciously and intentionally kills an animal, is guilty of a crime punishable pursuant to subdivision (d).
(b)Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (a) or (c), every person who overdrives, overloads, drives when overloaded, overworks, tortures, torments, deprives of necessary sustenance, drink, or shelter, cruelly beats, mutilates, or cruelly kills an animal, or causes or procures an animal to be so overdriven, overloaded, driven when overloaded, overworked, tortured, tormented, deprived of necessary sustenance, drink, shelter, or to be cruelly beaten, mutilated, or cruelly killed; and whoever, having the charge or custody of an animal, either as owner or otherwise, subjects an animal to needless suffering, or inflicts unnecessary cruelty upon the animal, or in any manner abuses an animal, or fails to provide the animal with proper food, drink, or shelter, or protection from the weather, or who drives, rides, or otherwise uses the animal when unfit for labor, is, for each offense, guilty of a crime punishable pursuant to subdivision (d).
(c)Every person who maliciously and intentionally maims, mutilates, or tortures a mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish, as described in subdivision (e), is guilty of a crime punishable pursuant to subdivision (d).
(d) A violation of subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is punishable as a felony by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170, or by a fine of not more than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment, or alternatively, as a misdemeanor by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine of not more than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment.
(e)(1)Subdivision (c) applies to any mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish which is a creature described as follows:
(A)Endangered species or threatened species as described in Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code.
(B)Fully protected birds described in Section 3511 of the Fish and Game Code.
(C)Fully protected mammals described in Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 4700) of Part 3 of Division 4 of the Fish and Game Code.
(D)Fully protected reptiles and amphibians described in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 5050) of Division 5 of the Fish and Game Code.
(E)Fully protected fish as described in Section 5515 of the Fish and Game Code.
(2)This subdivision does not supersede or affect any law relating to taking of the described species, including, but not limited to, Section 12008 of the Fish and Game Code.
(f)For the purposes of subdivision (c), each act of malicious and intentional maiming, mutilating, or torturing a separate specimen of a creature described in subdivision (e) is a separate offense. If a person is charged with a violation of subdivision (c), the proceedings shall be subject to Section 12157 of the Fish and Game Code.
(g)(1)Upon the conviction of a person charged with a violation of this section by causing or permitting an act of cruelty, as defined in Section 599b, all animals lawfully seized and impounded with respect to the violation by a peace officer, officer of a humane society, or officer of a pound or animal regulation department of a public agency shall be adjudged by the court to be forfeited and shall thereupon be awarded to the impounding officer for proper disposition. A person convicted of a violation of this section by causing or permitting an act of cruelty, as defined in Section 599b, shall be liable to the impounding officer for all costs of impoundment from the time of seizure to the time of proper disposition.
(2)Mandatory seizure or impoundment shall not apply to animals in properly conducted scientific experiments or investigations performed under the authority of the faculty of a regularly incorporated medical college or university of this state.
(h)Notwithstanding any other law, if a defendant is granted probation for a conviction under this section, the court shall order the defendant to pay for, and successfully complete, counseling, as determined by the court, designed to evaluate and treat behavior or conduct disorders. If the court finds that the defendant is financially unable to pay for that counseling, the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based upon the defendants ability to pay. An indigent defendant may negotiate a deferred payment schedule, but shall pay a nominal fee if the defendant has the ability to pay the nominal fee. County mental health departments or Medi-Cal shall be responsible for the costs of counseling required by this section only for those persons who meet the medical necessity criteria for mental health managed care pursuant to Section 1830.205 of Title 9 of the California Code of Regulations or the targeted population criteria specified in Section 5600.3 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. The counseling specified in this subdivision shall be in addition to any other terms and conditions of probation, including any term of imprisonment and any fine. This provision specifies a mandatory additional term of probation and is not to be utilized as an alternative in lieu of imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 or county jail when that sentence is otherwise appropriate. If the court does not order custody as a condition of probation for a conviction under this section, the court shall specify on the court record the reason or reasons for not ordering custody. This subdivision shall not apply to cases involving police dogs or horses as described in Section 600.SEC. 5.Section 597.1 of the Penal Code is amended to read:597.1.(a)(1)Every owner, driver, or keeper of any animal who permits the animal to be in any building, enclosure, lane, street, square, or lot of any city, county, city and county, or judicial district without proper care and attention is guilty of a misdemeanor. misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding six months, by a fine not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment. Any peace officer, humane society officer, or animal control officer shall take possession of the stray or abandoned animal and shall provide care and treatment for the animal until the animal is deemed to be in suitable condition to be returned to the owner. When the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that very prompt action is required to protect the health or safety of the animal or the health or safety of others, the officer shall immediately seize the animal and comply with subdivision (f). In all other cases, the officer shall comply with the provisions of subdivision (g). The full cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized under this subdivision or pursuant to a search warrant shall constitute a lien on the animal and the animal shall not be returned to its owner until the charges are paid, if the seizure is upheld pursuant to this section.
(2)Notwithstanding any other law, if an animal control officer or humane officer, when necessary to protect the health and safety of a wild, stray, or abandoned animal or the health and safety of others, seeks to administer a tranquilizer that contains a controlled substance, as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code, to gain control of that animal, he or she may possess and administer that tranquilizer with direct or indirect supervision as determined by a licensed veterinarian, provided that the officer has met each of the following requirements:
(A)Has received training in the administration of tranquilizers from a licensed veterinarian. The training shall be approved by the California Veterinary Medical Board.
(B)Has successfully completed the firearms component of a course relating to the exercise of police powers, as set forth in Section 832.
(C)Is authorized by his or her agency or organization to possess and administer the tranquilizer in accordance with a policy established by the agency or organization and approved by the veterinarian who obtained the controlled substance.
(D)Has successfully completed the euthanasia training set forth in Section 2039 of Title 16 of the California Code of Regulations.
(E)Has completed a state and federal fingerprinting background check and does not have any drug- or alcohol-related convictions.
(b)Every sick, disabled, infirm, or crippled animal, except a dog or cat, that is abandoned in any city, county, city and county, or judicial district may be killed by the officer if, after a reasonable search, no owner of the animal can be found. It shall be the duty of all peace officers, humane society officers, and animal control officers to cause the animal to be killed or rehabilitated and placed in a suitable home on information that the animal is stray or abandoned. The officer may likewise take charge of any animal, including a dog or cat, that by reason of lameness, sickness, feebleness, or neglect, is unfit for the labor it is performing, or that in any other manner is being cruelly treated, and provide care and treatment for the animal until it is deemed to be in a suitable condition to be returned to the owner. When the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that very prompt action is required to protect the health or safety of an animal or the health or safety of others, the officer shall immediately seize the animal and comply with subdivision (f). In all other cases, the officer shall comply with subdivision (g). The full cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized under this subdivision or pursuant to a search warrant shall constitute a lien on the animal and the animal shall not be returned to its owner until the charges are paid.
(c)(1)Any peace officer, humane society officer, or animal control officer shall convey all injured cats and dogs found without their owners in a public place directly to a veterinarian known by the officer to be a veterinarian who ordinarily treats dogs and cats for a determination of whether the animal shall be immediately and humanely destroyed or shall be hospitalized under proper care and given emergency treatment.
(2)If the owner does not redeem the animal within the locally prescribed waiting period, the veterinarian may personally perform euthanasia on the animal. If the animal is treated and recovers from its injuries, the veterinarian may keep the animal for purposes of adoption, provided the responsible animal control agency has first been contacted and has refused to take possession of the animal.
(3)Whenever any animal is transferred to a veterinarian in a clinic, such as an emergency clinic that is not in continuous operation, the veterinarian may, in turn, transfer the animal to an appropriate facility.
(4)If the veterinarian determines that the animal shall be hospitalized under proper care and given emergency treatment, the costs of any services that are provided pending the owners inquiry to the responsible agency, department, or society shall be paid from the dog license fees, fines, and fees for impounding dogs in the city, county, or city and county in which the animal was licensed or, if the animal is unlicensed, shall be paid by the jurisdiction in which the animal was found, subject to the provision that this cost be repaid by the animals owner. The full cost of caring for and treating any animal seized under this subdivision shall constitute a lien on the animal and the animal shall not be returned to the owner until the charges are paid. No veterinarian shall be criminally or civilly liable for any decision that he or she makes or for services that he or she provides pursuant to this subdivision.
(d)An animal control agency that takes possession of an animal pursuant to subdivision (c) shall keep records of the whereabouts of the animal from the time of possession to the end of the animals impoundment, and those records shall be available for inspection by the public upon request for three years after the date the animals impoundment ended.
(e)Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, any peace officer, humane society officer, or any animal control officer may, with the approval of his or her immediate superior, humanely destroy any stray or abandoned animal in the field in any case where the animal is too severely injured to move or where a veterinarian is not available and it would be more humane to euthanize the animal.
(f)Whenever an officer authorized under this section seizes or impounds an animal based on a reasonable belief that prompt action is required to protect the health or safety of the animal or the health or safety of others, the officer shall, prior to the commencement of any criminal proceedings authorized by this section, provide the owner or keeper of the animal, if known or ascertainable after reasonable investigation, with the opportunity for a postseizure hearing to determine the validity of the seizure or impoundment, or both.
(1)The agency shall cause a notice to be affixed to a conspicuous place where the animal was situated or personally deliver a notice of the seizure or impoundment, or both, to the owner or keeper within 48 hours, excluding weekends and holidays. The notice shall include all of the following:
(A)The name, business address, and telephone number of the officer providing the notice.
(B)A description of the animal seized, including any identification upon the animal.
(C)The authority and purpose for the seizure or impoundment, including the time, place, and circumstances under which the animal was seized.
(D)A statement that, in order to receive a postseizure hearing, the owner or person authorized to keep the animal, or his or her agent, shall request the hearing by signing and returning an enclosed declaration of ownership or right to keep the animal to the agency providing the notice within 10 days, including weekends and holidays, of the date of the notice. The declaration may be returned by personal delivery or mail.
(E)A statement that the full cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized under this section is a lien on the animal and that the animal shall not be returned to the owner until the charges are paid, and that failure to request or to attend a scheduled hearing shall result in liability for this cost.
(2)The postseizure hearing shall be conducted within 48 hours of the request, excluding weekends and holidays. The seizing agency may authorize its own officer or employee to conduct the hearing if the hearing officer is not the same person who directed the seizure or impoundment of the animal and is not junior in rank to that person. The agency may utilize the services of a hearing officer from outside the agency for the purposes of complying with this section.
(3)Failure of the owner or keeper, or of his or her agent, to request or to attend a scheduled hearing shall result in a forfeiture of any right to a postseizure hearing or right to challenge his or her liability for costs incurred.
(4)The agency, department, or society employing the person who directed the seizure shall be responsible for the costs incurred for caring and treating the animal, if it is determined in the postseizure hearing that the seizing officer did not have reasonable grounds to believe very prompt action, including seizure of the animal, was required to protect the health or safety of the animal or the health or safety of others. If it is determined the seizure was justified, the owner or keeper shall be personally liable to the seizing agency for the full cost of the seizure and care of the animal. The charges for the seizure and care of the animal shall be a lien on the animal. The animal shall not be returned to its owner until the charges are paid and the owner demonstrates to the satisfaction of the seizing agency or the hearing officer that the owner can and will provide the necessary care for the animal.
(g)Where the need for immediate seizure is not present and prior to the commencement of any criminal proceedings authorized by this section, the agency shall provide the owner or keeper of the animal, if known or ascertainable after reasonable investigation, with the opportunity for a hearing prior to any seizure or impoundment of the animal. The owner shall produce the animal at the time of the hearing unless, prior to the hearing, the owner has made arrangements with the agency to view the animal upon request of the agency, or unless the owner can provide verification that the animal was humanely destroyed. Any person who willfully fails to produce the animal or provide the verification is guilty of an infraction, punishable by a fine of not less than two hundred fifty dollars ($250) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).
(1)The agency shall cause a notice to be affixed to a conspicuous place where the animal was situated or personally deliver a notice stating the grounds for believing the animal should be seized under subdivision (a) or (b). The notice shall include all of the following:
(A)The name, business address, and telephone number of the officer providing the notice.
(B)A description of the animal to be seized, including any identification upon the animal.
(C)The authority and purpose for the possible seizure or impoundment.
(D)A statement that, in order to receive a hearing prior to any seizure, the owner or person authorized to keep the animal, or his or her agent, shall request the hearing by signing and returning the enclosed declaration of ownership or right to keep the animal to the officer providing the notice within two days, excluding weekends and holidays, of the date of the notice.
(E)A statement that the cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized under this section is a lien on the animal, that any animal seized shall not be returned to the owner until the charges are paid, and that failure to request or to attend a scheduled hearing shall result in a conclusive determination that the animal may properly be seized and that the owner shall be liable for the charges.
(2)The preseizure hearing shall be conducted within 48 hours, excluding weekends and holidays, after receipt of the request. The seizing agency may authorize its own officer or employee to conduct the hearing if the hearing officer is not the same person who requests the seizure or impoundment of the animal and is not junior in rank to that person. The agency may utilize the services of a hearing officer from outside the agency for the purposes of complying with this section.
(3)Failure of the owner or keeper, or his or her agent, to request or to attend a scheduled hearing shall result in a forfeiture of any right to a preseizure hearing or right to challenge his or her liability for costs incurred pursuant to this section.
(4)The hearing officer, after the hearing, may affirm or deny the owners or keepers right to custody of the animal and, if reasonable grounds are established, may order the seizure or impoundment of the animal for care and treatment.
(h)If any animal is properly seized under this section or pursuant to a search warrant, the owner or keeper shall be personally liable to the seizing agency for the cost of the seizure and care of the animal. Further, if the charges for the seizure or impoundment and any other charges permitted under this section are not paid within 14 days of the seizure, or if the owner, within 14 days of notice of availability of the animal to be returned, fails to pay charges permitted under this section and take possession of the animal, the animal shall be deemed to have been abandoned and may be disposed of by the seizing agency.
(i)If the animal requires veterinary care and the humane society or public agency is not assured, within 14 days of the seizure of the animal, that the owner will provide the necessary care, the animal shall not be returned to its owner and shall be deemed to have been abandoned and may be disposed of by the seizing agency. A veterinarian may humanely destroy an impounded animal without regard to the prescribed holding period when it has been determined that the animal has incurred severe injuries or is incurably crippled. A veterinarian also may immediately humanely destroy an impounded animal afflicted with a serious contagious disease unless the owner or his or her agent immediately authorizes treatment of the animal by a veterinarian at the expense of the owner or agent.
(j)No animal properly seized under this section or pursuant to a search warrant shall be returned to its owner until the owner can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the seizing agency or hearing officer that the owner can and will provide the necessary care for the animal.
(k)(1)In the case of cats and dogs, prior to the final disposition of any criminal charges, the seizing agency or prosecuting attorney may file a petition in a criminal action requesting that, prior to that final disposition, the court issue an order forfeiting the animal to the city, county, or seizing agency. The petitioner shall serve a true copy of the petition upon the defendant and the prosecuting attorney.
(2)Upon receipt of the petition, the court shall set a hearing on the petition. The hearing shall be conducted within 14 days after the filing of the petition, or as soon as practicable.
(3)The petitioner shall have the burden of establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that, even in the event of an acquittal of the criminal charges, the owner will not legally be permitted to retain the animal in question. If the court finds that the petitioner has met its burden, the court shall order the immediate forfeiture of the animal as sought by the petition.
(4)Nothing in this subdivision is intended to authorize a seizing agency or prosecuting attorney to file a petition to determine an owners ability to legally retain an animal pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (l) if a petition has previously been filed pursuant to this subdivision.
(l)(1)Upon the conviction of a person charged with a violation of this section, or Section 597 or 597a, all animals lawfully seized and impounded with respect to the violation shall be adjudged by the court to be forfeited and shall thereupon be transferred to the impounding officer or appropriate public entity for proper adoption or other disposition. A person convicted of a violation of this section shall be personally liable to the seizing agency for all costs of impoundment from the time of seizure to the time of proper disposition. Upon conviction, the court shall order the convicted person to make payment to the appropriate public entity for the costs incurred in the housing, care, feeding, and treatment of the seized or impounded animals. Each person convicted in connection with a particular animal may be held jointly and severally liable for restitution for that particular animal. The payment shall be in addition to any other fine or sentence ordered by the court.
(2)The court may also order, as a condition of probation, that the convicted person be prohibited from owning, possessing, caring for, or residing with, animals of any kind, and require the convicted person to immediately deliver all animals in his or her possession to a designated public entity for adoption or other lawful disposition or provide proof to the court that the person no longer has possession, care, or control of any animals. In the event of the acquittal or final discharge without conviction of the person charged, if the animal is still impounded, the animal has not been previously deemed abandoned pursuant to subdivision (h), the court has not ordered that the animal be forfeited pursuant to subdivision (k), the court shall, on demand, direct the release of seized or impounded animals to the defendant upon a showing of proof of ownership.
(3)Any questions regarding ownership shall be determined in a separate hearing by the court where the criminal case was finally adjudicated and the court shall hear testimony from any persons who may assist the court in determining ownership of the animal. If the owner is determined to be unknown or the owner is prohibited or unable to retain possession of the animals for any reason, the court shall order the animals to be released to the appropriate public entity for adoption or other lawful disposition. This section is not intended to cause the release of any animal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish seized or impounded pursuant to any other statute, ordinance, or municipal regulation. This section shall not prohibit the seizure or impoundment of animals as evidence as provided for under any other provision of law.
(m)It shall be the duty of all peace officers, humane society officers, and animal control officers to use all currently acceptable methods of identification, both electronic and otherwise, to determine the lawful owner or caretaker of any seized or impounded animal. It shall also be their duty to make reasonable efforts to notify the owner or caretaker of the whereabouts of the animal and any procedures available for the lawful recovery of the animal and, upon the owners and caretakers initiation of recovery procedures, retain custody of the animal for a reasonable period of time to allow for completion of the recovery process. Efforts to locate or contact the owner or caretaker and communications with persons claiming to be the owner or caretaker shall be recorded and maintained and be made available for public inspection.
SEC. 6.Section 597f of the Penal Code is amended to read:597f.(a)Every owner, driver, or possessor of any animal, who permits the animal to be in any building, enclosure, lane, street, square, or lot, of any city, city and county, or judicial district, without proper care and attention, shall, on conviction, be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor. misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding six months, by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment. And it shall be the duty of any peace officer, officer of the humane society, or officer of a pound or animal regulation department of a public agency, to take possession of the animal so abandoned or neglected and care for the animal until it is redeemed by the owner or claimant, and the cost of caring for the animal shall be a lien on the animal until the charges are paid. Every sick, disabled, infirm, or crippled animal, except a dog or cat, which shall be abandoned in any city, city and county, or judicial district, may, if after due search no owner can be found therefor, be killed by the officer; and it officer. It shall be the duty of all peace officers, an officer of such society, or officer of a pound or animal regulation department of a public agency to cause the animal to be killed on information of such abandonment. The officer may likewise take charge of any animal, including a dog or cat, that by reason of lameness, sickness, feebleness, or neglect, is unfit for the labor it is performing, or that in any other manner is being cruelly treated; treated and, if the animal is not then in the custody of its owner, the officer shall give notice thereof to the owner, if known, and may provide suitable care for the animal until it is deemed to be in a suitable condition to be delivered to the owner, and any owner. Any necessary expenses which may be incurred for taking care of and keeping the animal shall be a lien thereon, to be paid before the animal can be lawfully recovered.
(b)(1)It shall be the duty of all officers of pounds or humane societies, and animal regulation departments of public agencies to convey, and for police and sheriff departments, to cause to be conveyed all injured cats and dogs found without their owners in a public place directly to a veterinarian known by the officer or agency to be a veterinarian that ordinarily treats dogs and cats for a determination of whether the animal shall be immediately and humanely destroyed or shall be hospitalized under proper care and given emergency treatment.
If(2)If the owner does not redeem the animal within the locally prescribed waiting period, the veterinarian may personally perform euthanasia on the animal; animal, or, if the animal is treated and recovers from its injuries, the veterinarian may keep the animal for purposes of adoption, provided the responsible animal control agency has first been contacted and has refused to take possession of the animal.
Whenever(3)Whenever any animal is transferred pursuant to this subdivision to a veterinarian in a clinic, such as an emergency clinic which is not in continuous operation, the veterinarian may, in turn, transfer the animal to an appropriate facility.
If(4)If the veterinarian determines that the animal shall be hospitalized under proper care and given emergency treatment, the costs of any services which are provided pending the owners inquiry to the agency, department, or society shall be paid from the dog license fees, fines, and fees for impounding dogs in the city, county, or city and county in which the animal was licensed or if the animal is unlicensed the jurisdiction in which the animal was found, subject to the provision that this cost be repaid by the animals owner. No veterinarian shall be criminally or civilly liable for any decision which he or she makes or services which he or she provides pursuant to this section.
(c)An animal control agency which takes possession of an animal pursuant to subdivision (b), shall keep records of the whereabouts of the animal for a 72-hour period from the time of possession and those records shall be available to inspection by the public upon request.
(d)Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, any officer of a pound or animal regulation department or humane society, or any officer of a police or sheriffs department may, with the approval of his or her immediate superior, humanely destroy any abandoned animal in the field in any case where the animal is too severely injured to move or where a veterinarian is not available and it would be more humane to dispose of the animal.
SEC. 7.Section 600 of the Penal Code is amended to read:600.(a)Any person who willfully and maliciously and with no legal justification strikes, beats, kicks, cuts, stabs, shoots with a firearm, administers any poison or other harmful or stupefying substance to, or throws, hurls, or projects at, or places any rock, object, or other substance which is used in such a manner as to be capable of producing injury and likely to produce injury, on or in the path of, a horse being used by, or a dog under the supervision of, a peace officer in the discharge or attempted discharge of his or her duties, or a volunteer who is acting under the direct supervision of a peace officer in the discharge or attempted discharge of his or her assigned volunteer duties, is guilty of a public offense. If the injury inflicted is a serious injury, as described in subdivision (c), the person shall be punished by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for 16 months, two or three years, or in a county jail for not exceeding one year, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both a fine and imprisonment. If the injury inflicted is not a serious injury, the person shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for not exceeding one year, or by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both a fine and imprisonment.
(b)Any person who willfully and maliciously and with no legal justification interferes with or obstructs a horse or dog being used by a peace officer in the discharge or attempted discharge of his or her duties, or a volunteer who is acting under the direct supervision of a peace officer in the discharge or attempted discharge of his or her assigned volunteer duties, by frightening, teasing, agitating, harassing, or hindering the horse or dog shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for not exceeding one year, or by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both a fine and imprisonment.
(c)Any person who, in violation of this section, and with intent to inflict that injury or death, personally causes the death, destruction, or serious physical injury including bone fracture, loss or impairment of function of any bodily member, wounds requiring extensive suturing, or serious crippling, of a horse or dog, shall, upon conviction of a felony under this section, in addition and consecutive to the punishment prescribed for the felony, be punished by an additional term of imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for one year.
(d)Any person who, in violation of this section, and with the intent to inflict that injury, personally causes great bodily injury, as defined in Section 12022.7, to any person not an accomplice, shall, upon conviction of a felony under this section, in addition and consecutive to the punishment prescribed for the felony, be punished by an additional term of imprisonment in the state prison for two years unless the conduct described in this subdivision is an element of any other offense of which the person is convicted or receives an enhancement under Section 12022.7.
(e)A defendant convicted of a violation of this section shall be ordered to make restitution to the agency owning the animal and employing the peace officer, to a volunteer who is acting under the direct supervision of a peace officer who is using his or her horse or supervising his or her dog in the performance of his or her assigned duties, or to the agency that provides, or the individual who provides, veterinary health care coverage or veterinary care for a horse or dog being used by, or under the supervision of, a volunteer who is acting under the direct supervision of a peace officer for any veterinary bills, replacement costs of the animal if it is disabled or killed, and, if applicable, the salary of the peace officer for the period of time his or her services are lost to the agency.
SEC. 8.Section 600.7 is added to the Penal Code, to read:600.7.(a)Every defendant who is convicted of an offense specified in subdivision (c) shall be ordered to pay for and complete the responsible animal owner education course described in subdivision (b). If the court finds that the defendant is financially unable to pay for the course, the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based upon the defendants ability to pay. An indigent defendant may negotiate a deferred payment schedule, but shall pay a nominal fee if the defendant has the ability to pay the nominal fee.
(b)(1)The responsible animal owner education course for persons convicted of an offense specified in subdivision (c) may be conducted online or in person, or in a combination of both, and shall consist of all of the following:
(A)A minimum of five instructional hours.
(B)Mechanisms to ensure the minimum hours of instruction have been completed by the participant.
(C)Attendance shall be verified. If the course is completed online, the course provider shall maintain a system to validate the identity of the person taking the course.
(D)The course provider shall incorporate a validation process that verifies participant comprehension of course material related to the educational objectives as follows:
(i)The course provider shall test the participants mastery of the course content by asking at least two questions from each major unit or section. The questions shall be multiple choice.
(ii)The questions shall be difficult enough that the answer may not be easily determined without having viewed the contents of the major unit or section.
(2)The educational objectives of the responsible animal owner course shall include, but not be limited to, promotion of all of the following:
(A)Responsible care concepts for animals, both livestock and nonlivestock, including instruction on providing for the health, safety, and welfare of livestock and nonlivestock animals and wildlife, including appropriate shelter and housing, the importance of spaying and neutering, and the proper tethering and transportation of animals.
(B)Responsible pet ownership, including, but not limited to, ensuring the safety of both the community and the animal and bite prevention.
(C)Respect and observance of federal and state laws that protect livestock and nonlivestock animals and wildlife.
(D)An overview of state and federal laws related to cruelty to livestock and nonlivestock animals and animal fighting.
(E)Appropriate training and discipline tactics for livestock and nonlivestock animals.
(3)All responsible owner education courses for persons convicted of an offense specified in subdivision (c) shall be reviewed and certified by the State Department of Health Care Services. Each application for course certification shall be accompanied by a course outline that identifies the educational objectives outlined in paragraph (2) and the amount of time allotted for each educational objective.
(c)This section applies to a conviction for any of the following offenses:
(1)Section 286.5.
(2)Section 596.
(3)Section 596.5.
(4)Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 597.
(5)Paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 597.1.
(6)Subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 597.5.
(7)Section 597.6.
(8)Section 597.7.
(9)Section 597a.
(10)Section 597b.
(11)Section 597c.
(12)Section 597f.
(13)Section 597g.
(14)Section 597h.
(15)Section 597i.
(16)Section 597j.
(17)Section 597k.
(18)Section 597m.
(19)Section 597n.
(20)Section 597s.
(21)Section 597t.
(22)Section 597u.
(23)Section 597v.
(24)Section 597x.
(25)Section 597z.
(26)Section 599f.
(27)Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 600.
(28)Section 600.2.
(29)Section 600.5.
SEC. 9.Section 600.8 is added to the Penal Code, to read:600.8.(a)(1)Every defendant who is convicted of an offense specified in subdivision (b) shall be subject to a mandatory mental health evaluation. Upon evaluation, if the evaluating mental health professional deems it necessary, the defendant shall complete mandatory counseling. Mental health evaluations and any subsequent treatment shall be paid for by the defendant. If the court finds that the defendant is financially unable to pay for that counseling, the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based upon the defendants ability to pay. An indigent defendant may negotiate a deferred payment schedule, but shall pay a nominal fee if the defendant has the ability to pay the nominal fee.
(2)Mental health evaluation shall be completed within 90 days of the conviction or at the soonest time deemed appropriate by the court, unless the defendant is sentenced to imprisonment, in which case the mental health evaluation shall be completed within 90 days of release or at the soonest time deemed appropriate by the court. If the offender is referred to counseling, he or she shall begin counseling within 90 days or at the soonest time deemed appropriate by the court and shall submit proof of completion to the court.
(3)Failure to complete these requirements shall result in the termination of any diversion program, probation, mandatory supervision, or postrelease community supervision.
(b)This section applies to a conviction for any of the following offenses:
(1)Section 286.5.
(2)Section 596.
(3)Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 597.
(4)Paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 597.1.
(5)Section 597f.
(6)Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) of Section 600.
(7)Section 600.2.
(8)Section 600.5.
SEC. 10.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
(a)Except as provided in subdivision (c) of this section or Section 599c, every person who maliciously and intentionally maims, mutilates, tortures, or wounds a living animal, or maliciously and intentionally kills an animal, is guilty of a crime punishable pursuant to subdivision (d).
(b)Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (a) or (c), every person who overdrives, overloads, drives when overloaded, overworks, tortures, torments, deprives of necessary sustenance, drink, or shelter, cruelly beats, mutilates, or cruelly kills any an animal, or causes or procures any an animal to be so overdriven, overloaded, driven when overloaded, overworked, tortured, tormented, deprived of necessary sustenance, drink, shelter, or to be cruelly beaten, mutilated, or cruelly killed; and whoever, having the charge or custody of any an animal, either as owner or otherwise, subjects any an animal to needless suffering, or inflicts unnecessary cruelty upon the animal, or in any manner abuses any an animal, or fails to provide the animal with proper food, drink, or shelter shelter, or protection from the weather, or who drives, rides, or otherwise uses the animal when unfit for labor, is, for each offense, guilty of a crime punishable pursuant to subdivision (d).
(c)Every person who maliciously and intentionally maims, mutilates, or tortures any a mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish, as described in subdivision (e), is guilty of a crime punishable pursuant to subdivision (d).
(d) A violation of subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is punishable as a felony by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170, or by a fine of not more than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment, or alternatively, as a misdemeanor by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine of not more than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment.
(e)(1)Subdivision (c) applies to any mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish which is a creature described as follows:
(1)(A)Endangered species or threatened species as described in Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code.
(2)(B)Fully protected birds described in Section 3511 of the Fish and Game Code.
(3)(C)Fully protected mammals described in Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 4700) of Part 3 of Division 4 of the Fish and Game Code.
(4)(D)Fully protected reptiles and amphibians described in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 5050) of Division 5 of the Fish and Game Code.
(5)(E)Fully protected fish as described in Section 5515 of the Fish and Game Code.
This
(2)This subdivision does not supersede or affect any provisions of law relating to taking of the described species, including, but not limited to, Section 12008 of the Fish and Game Code.
(f)For the purposes of subdivision (c), each act of malicious and intentional maiming, mutilating, or torturing a separate specimen of a creature described in subdivision (e) is a separate offense. If any a person is charged with a violation of subdivision (c), the proceedings shall be subject to Section 12157 of the Fish and Game Code.
(g)(1)Upon the conviction of a person charged with a violation of this section by causing or permitting an act of cruelty, as defined in Section 599b, all animals lawfully seized and impounded with respect to the violation by a peace officer, officer of a humane society, or officer of a pound or animal regulation department of a public agency shall be adjudged by the court to be forfeited and shall thereupon be awarded to the impounding officer for proper disposition. A person convicted of a violation of this section by causing or permitting an act of cruelty, as defined in Section 599b, shall be liable to the impounding officer for all costs of impoundment from the time of seizure to the time of proper disposition.
(2)Mandatory seizure or impoundment shall not apply to animals in properly conducted scientific experiments or investigations performed under the authority of the faculty of a regularly incorporated medical college or university of this state.
(h)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if a defendant is granted probation for a conviction under this section, the court shall order the defendant to pay for, and successfully complete, counseling, as determined by the court, designed to evaluate and treat behavior or conduct disorders. If the court finds that the defendant is financially unable to pay for that counseling, the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based upon the defendants ability to pay. An indigent defendant may negotiate a deferred payment schedule, but shall pay a nominal fee if the defendant has the ability to pay the nominal fee. County mental health departments or Medi-Cal shall be responsible for the costs of counseling required by this section only for those persons who meet the medical necessity criteria for mental health managed care pursuant to Section 1830.205 of Title 9 of the California Code of Regulations or the targeted population criteria specified in Section 5600.3 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. The counseling specified in this subdivision shall be in addition to any other terms and conditions of probation, including any term of imprisonment and any fine. This provision specifies a mandatory additional term of probation and is not to be utilized as an alternative in lieu of imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 or county jail when that sentence is otherwise appropriate. If the court does not order custody as a condition of probation for a conviction under this section, the court shall specify on the court record the reason or reasons for not ordering custody. This subdivision shall not apply to cases involving police dogs or horses as described in Section 600.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2018 | August 16 hearing: Held in committee and under submission. |
| Aug 8, 2018 | August 8 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file. |
| Jun 21, 2018 | Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Jun 20, 2018 | From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 19). |
| Jun 7, 2018 | Referred to Com. on PUB. S. |
| May 31, 2018 | In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk. |
| May 30, 2018 | Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 32. Noes 0.) Ordered to the Assembly. |
| May 29, 2018 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| May 25, 2018 | From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 25). |
| May 18, 2018 | Set for hearing May 25. |
| May 14, 2018 | May 14 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file. |
| May 7, 2018 | From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| May 4, 2018 | Set for hearing May 14. |
| May 1, 2018 | Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Apr 30, 2018 | From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (April 24). |
| Apr 12, 2018 | Set for hearing April 24. |
| Apr 11, 2018 | April 17 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author. |
| Apr 6, 2018 | Set for hearing April 17. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. |
| Apr 2, 2018 | From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. |
| Feb 14, 2018 | Referred to Com. on RLS. |
| Feb 8, 2018 | From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 10. |
| Feb 7, 2018 | Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2018 | Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety |
Passed |
|
| May 30, 2018 | Senate 3rd Reading SB1024 Wilk et al. | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| May 25, 2018 | Do pass as amended | Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| May 14, 2018 | Placed on suspense file | Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Apr 24, 2018 | Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Senate Standing Committee on Public Safety |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| 1 Private Individual | ** Support | Jun 18, 2018 |
| Alley Cat Rescue | ** Support | May 28, 2018 |
| American Civil Liberties Union of California | ** Against | Jun 18, 2018 |
| Animal Friends Of The Valleys | ** Support | May 28, 2018 |
| Animal Legal Defense Fund | ** Support | May 28, 2018 |
| Animals & Society Institute Colorado Voters For Animals | ** Support | May 28, 2018 |
| California Police Chiefs Association | ** Support | Jun 18, 2018 |
| Chief Probation Officers Of California (Cpoc) | * Against Unless Amend | Jun 19, 2018 |
| Humane Education Advocates Reaching Teachers | ** Support | May 28, 2018 |
| Humane Society Of The United States | ** Support | May 28, 2018 |
| Lighthouse Public Affairs | * Support | Apr 24, 2018 |
| Paw project | * Support | Apr 24, 2018 |
| PURPOSE | ** Against | Apr 23, 2018 |
| Shelter Transport Animal Rescue Team | ** Support | May 28, 2018 |
| Social Compassion In Legislation | * Support | Jun 19, 2018 |
| The Paw Project | ** Support | May 28, 2018 |
Date of Hearing: August 8, 2018
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher, Chair
SBPCA Bill Id:SB 1024
Author:(Wilk) – As Amended Ver:June 21, 2018
Policy Committee: | Public Safety | Vote: | 7 - 0 |
|
| ||
|
|
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: Yes
SUMMARY:
This bill eliminates mandatory counseling for some defendants charged with certain animal abuse crimes and instead provides courts with discretion to require counseling for a broader range of animal abuse crimes. Specifically, this bill:
- Deletes the requirement that a court order a defendant to pay for, and successfully complete, counseling, as determined by the court if the defendant receives probation.
- Requires a court to consider for every defendant who is granted probation for a broad range of animal abuse offenses, whether to order that the person undergo a mental health evaluation by an evaluator chosen by the court.
- Specifies if the evaluating mental health professional deems it necessary, the defendant must complete mandatory counseling.
- States that mental health evaluations and any subsequent treatment shall be paid for by the defendant, but if the court finds that the defendant is financially unable to pay for that counseling, the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based upon the defendant’s ability to pay.
FISCAL EFFECT:
- Unknown potentially significant costs, possibly in the millions of dollars annually, for courts or county mental health departments to conduct mental health evaluations and provide treatment for defendants unable to pay for the evaluation or treatment. This bill is not keyed as a mandated local program because the requirements to conduct mental health evaluations and provide treatment are written to be responsibilities of the courts. However, courts themselves do not conduct those types of activities and are likely to rely on county mental health programs. Whether this bill results in costs to the courts or a local mandate to county mental health programs will depend on the actual implementation and is subject to a determination by the Commission on State Mandates. Actual costs will depend on how many defendants receive mental health evaluations and treatment and are unable to pay.
- Unknown potential savings to the extent that mental health counseling reduces a defendant’s likelihood of recidivating or committing more egregious crimes in the future.
COMMENTS:
- Background. Under current law, a person charged with animal abuse under Penal Code Section 597, is required to undergo mental health counseling if they are granted probation. Current law does not provide flexibility to courts to determine whether the defendant will benefit from mental health counseling. In addition, the current law requirements related to mental health counseling do not apply to certain other animal abuse crimes for which the defendant may benefit from counseling.
- Purpose. This bill removes the requirement that all defendants receiving probation for animal abuse under Penal Code 597 undergo mental health counseling. Instead this bill broadens the mental health counseling requirements to include more animal abuse crimes, but provides judicial discretion to determine whether to require counseling. According to the author:
Currently, sentencing option for animal abuse crimes are limited and judges are afforded little discretion in appropriate treatment or education for offenders. Fines, jail time, probation and forced animal surrender are the primarily utilized options. None of those are particularly well suited to addressing the underlying causes behind animal abuse as observed by law enforcement, mental health and animal welfare experts.
- Related legislation. AB 3040 (Nazarian) prohibits sexual contact, as defined, with any animal, and would require a person convicted of a violation of sexual contact with an animal to participate counseling as directed by the court. AB 3040 is pending hearing in the Senate Appropriations Committee.
Analysis Prepared by: Jessica Peters / APPR. / (916) 319-2081
Date of Hearing: June 19, 2018
Counsel: David Billingsley
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY
Reginald Byron Jones-Sawyer, Sr., Chair
SBPCA Bill Id:SB 1024
Author:(Wilk) – As Amended Ver:May 25, 2018
As Proposed to Be Amended in Committee
SUMMARY: Requires a court to consider ordering a defendant that has been granted probation after conviction of specified animal abuse crimes to undergo a mental health evaluation. Specifically, this bill:
- Deletes the requirement that if a defendant is granted probation for a conviction animal cruelty, the court shall order the defendant to pay for, and successfully complete, counseling, as determined by the court, designed to evaluate and treat behavior or conduct disorders.
- Requires the court to consider for every defendant who is granted probation for specified animal abuse offense, whether to order that the person undergo a mental health evaluation by an evaluator chosen by the court.
- Specifies if the evaluating mental health professional deems it necessary, the defendant shall complete mandatory counseling.
- States that mental health evaluations and any subsequent treatment shall be paid for by the defendant, but if the court finds that the defendant is financially unable to pay for that counseling, the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based upon the defendant’s ability to pay.
EXISTING LAW:
- Specifies the actions of a person who maliciously and intentionally maims, mutilates, tortures, or wounds a living animal, or maliciously and intentionally kills an animal as a criminal offense. (Pen. Code, § 597.)
- Specifies when a person overdrives, overloads, drives when overloaded, overworks, tortures, torments, deprives of necessary sustenance, drink, or shelter, cruelly beats, mutilates, or cruelly kills any animal, or causes or procures any animal to be so overdriven, overloaded, driven when overloaded, overworked, tortured, tormented, deprived of necessary sustenance, drink, shelter, or to be cruelly beaten, mutilated, or cruelly killed; and whoever, having the charge or custody of any animal, either as owner or otherwise, subjects any animal to needless suffering, or inflicts unnecessary cruelty upon the animal, or in any manner abuses any animal, or fails to provide the animal with proper food, drink, or shelter or protection from the weather, or who drives, rides, or otherwise uses the animal when unfit for labor as a criminal offense. (Pen. Code, § 597, subd. (b).)
- Specifies the actions of a person who maliciously and intentionally maims, mutilates, or tortures any mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish, as specified as a criminal offense. (Pen. Code, § 597, subd. (c).)
- States that a violation of animal cruelty may be punished as a felony by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170, or by a fine of not more than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment, or alternatively, as a misdemeanor by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine of not more than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment. (Pen. Code, § 597, subd. (d).)
- Specifies that upon the conviction of a person charged with a violation of this section by causing or permitting an act of cruelty, as specified, all animals lawfully seized and impounded with respect to the violation by a peace officer, officer of a humane society, or officer of a pound or animal regulation department of a public agency shall be adjudged by the court to be forfeited and shall thereupon be awarded to the impounding officer for proper disposition. A person convicted of a violation of this section by causing or permitting an act of cruelty, as specified, shall be liable to the impounding officer for all costs of impoundment from the time of seizure to the time of proper disposition. (Pen. Code, § 597, subd. (g).)
- States that if a defendant is granted probation for a conviction animal cruelty, the court shall order the defendant to pay for, and successfully complete, counseling, as determined by the court, designed to evaluate and treat behavior or conduct disorders. (Pen. Code, § 597, subd. (h).)
- States that if the court finds that the defendant is financially unable to pay for that counseling, the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based upon the defendant's ability to pay.
- Specifies that the counseling shall be in addition to any other terms and conditions of probation, including any term of imprisonment and any fine. (Pen. Code, § 597, subd. (h).)
- States that the court may also order, as a condition of probation, that the convicted person be prohibited from owning, possessing, caring for, or residing with, animals of any kind, and require the convicted person to immediately deliver all animals in his or her possession to a designated public entity for adoption or other lawful disposition or provide proof to the court that the person no longer has possession, care, or control of any animals. (Pen. Code, § 597.1, subd. (l)
- States that any person who has been convicted of a misdemeanor violation of animal cruelty, as specified, and who, within five years after the conviction, owns, possesses, maintains, has custody of, resides with, or cares for any animal is guilty of a crime, punishable by a fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000). (Pen. Code, § 597.9, subd. (a).)
- States that any person who has been convicted of a felony violation of animal cruelty, as specified, and who, within 10 years after the conviction, owns, possesses, maintains, has custody of, resides with, or cares for any animal is guilty of a public offense, punishable by a fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000). (Pen. Code, § 597.9, subd. (a).)
- Allows a defendant to petition the court to reduce the duration of the mandatory ownership prohibition. Upon receipt of a petition from the defendant, the court shall set a hearing to be conducted within 30 days after the filing of the petition. At the hearing, the petitioner shall have the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence all of the following: (Pen. Code, § 597.9, subd. (d)(1)(a)-(c).)
- He or she does not present a danger to animals;
- He or she has the ability to properly care for all animals in his or her possession; and,
- He or she has successfully completed all classes or counseling ordered by the court.
- He or she does not present a danger to animals;
- Specifies that if the petitioner has met his or her burden, the court may reduce the mandatory ownership prohibition and may order that the defendant comply with reasonable and unannounced inspections by animal control agencies or law enforcement. (Pen. Code, § 597.9, subd. (d)(2).)
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown
COMMENTS:
- Author's Statement: According to the author, "Currently, sentencing option for animal abuse crimes are limited and judges are afforded little discretion in appropriate treatment or education for offenders. Fines, jail time, probation and forced animal surrender are the primarily utilized options. None of those are particularly well suited to addressing the underlying causes behind animal abuse as observed by law enforcement, mental health and animal welfare experts. The link between animal abuse and violence towards humans is well documented. Offenders who display violence towards animals often commit violent acts towards humans whether it be domestic violence, child abuse or as we saw tragically in Parkland FL this year mass shootings. Mental health intervention early is often the key to stopping this progression and escalation of violent behavior.”
- Current Law Requires A Defendant Granted Probation for an Animal Cruelty Conviction to Undergo Counseling as Directed by the Court: Existing law states that if a defendant is granted probation for a conviction animal cruelty, the court shall order the defendant to pay for, and successfully complete, counseling, as determined by the court, designed to evaluate and treat behavior or conduct disorders. (Pen. Code, § 597, subd. (h).) If the court finds that the defendant is financially unable to pay for that counseling, the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based upon the defendant's ability to pay. The counseling shall be in addition to any other terms and conditions of probation, including any term of imprisonment and any fine. If the court does not order custody as a condition of probation for a conviction under this section, the court shall specify on the court record the reason or reasons for not ordering custody. (Id.)
Cases involving animal cruelty can vary significantly in terms of their nature and severity. Some cases involve simple neglect where an animal isn’t provided proper food or care. Other cases involve significant intentional acts of cruelty. Current law imposes a mandatory sentencing requirement of counseling. That mandatory sentencing requirement does not necessarily fit the needs or circumstances of all cases of animal cruelty.
"Society receives maximum protection when the penalty, treatment or disposition of the offender is tailored to the individual case. Only the trial judge has the knowledge, ability and tools at hand to properly individualize the treatment of the offender." (People v. Williams (1970) 30 Cal. 3d 470,482, citation and internal quotation marks omitted.) An effective sentencing framework seeks to avoid arbitrary or rigid sentencing procedures which lead to unjust results.
This bill would delete the requirement of mandatory counseling in every case of animal cruelty where the defendant is placed on probation, and instead would require the court to consider a mental health evaluation for a defendant who is granted probation for specified animal abuse offenses. This bill does not make the mental health evaluation mandatory. However, if a mental health evaluation is conducted and the evaluating mental health professional deems it necessary, the defendant must complete counseling as part of probation. This bill would also require the court to consider the mental health evaluation for a number of animal abuse crimes that do not currently require mandatory counseling.
- Amendments Proposed to be Adopted in Committee: The proposed amendments delete the requirement for the court to consider ordering a responsible animal owner education course for an individual granted probation after conviction for specified offenses related to animal abuse.
- Argument in Support: According to Social Compassion in Legislation, “The link between animal abuse and violence towards humans is indisputable. A 2001-2004 study by the Chicago Police Department ‘revealed a startling propensity for offenders charged with crimes against animals to commit other violent offenses toward human victims.’ Of those arrested for animal crimes, 65% had been arrested for battery against another person. Of 36 convicted multiple murderers questioned in one study, 46% admitted committing acts of animal torture as adolescents. And of seven school shootings that took place across the country between 1997 and 2001, all the boys involved had previously committed acts of animal cruelty. Currently, sentencing options for animal abuse crimes are limited and judges are afforded little discretion in appropriate treatment or education for offenders.
“This bill provides much needed guidance and discretion to address these issues. It is long overdue that our laws, law enforcement, and correctional system recognize that animal abuse is a significant issue and commend Senator Wilk for introducing a holistic approach toward rehabilitating those that commit such offenses.” - Argument in Opposition: According to the Chief Probation Officers of California, “While CPOC understands the need for responsible animal ownership, we have general concerns that the bill will not address the core treatment needs of people who commit crimes against animals. These types of crimes can be precursors to, or associated with, other behavior and treatment needs. The bill speaks to being a responsible pet owner, which is certainly important and something we agree with, but we are concerned that the programs, as contemplated would not address the criminogenic needs of the person who commits the offense.
“Further, we are concerned with the ambiguities in the bill relative to implementation. As currently drafted, the bill does not specify the entity responsible for developing, certifying, or conducting the responsible animal owner education course which could presumably fall to probation and would be a significant new workload and cost issue. Mandating additional duties, such as those set forth in this measure, must be considered against the backdrop of our existing statutory duties that ensure the safety, health, and well-being of the community, and lead to positive public safety outcomes.” (Argument in Opposition reflects the bill in print, not the amendments proposed to be adopted in committee) - Related Legislation:
- AB 2774 (Limon), would authorize a municipal animal shelter to ask an individual attempting to adopt an animal from the facility, whether he or she is prohibited from owning or possessing an animal. AB 2774 is awaiting hearing in the Senate Public Safety Committee.
- AB 3040 (Nazarian), would prohibit sexual contact, as defined, with any animal, and would require a person convicted of a violation of sexual contact with an animal to participate counseling as directed by the court. AB 3040 is awaiting hearing in the Senate Public Safety Committee.
- AB 2774 (Limon), would authorize a municipal animal shelter to ask an individual attempting to adopt an animal from the facility, whether he or she is prohibited from owning or possessing an animal. AB 2774 is awaiting hearing in the Senate Public Safety Committee.
- Prior Legislation:
- AB 628 (Chen), of the 2017-2018 Legislative Session, would have clarified procedures for notification of animal owners regarding hearings and payment of costs when an animal is seized or impounded. AB 628 was never heard in the Assembly Public Safety Committee.
- AB 2052 (Williams), of the 2015-2016 Legislative Session, would have required a person sentenced for two or more current convictions for specified animal abuse and animal cruelty offenses to be sentenced to consecutive terms of imprisonment. AB 2052 failed passage in the Assembly Appropriations Committee.
- AB 794 (Linder), Chapter 201, Statues of 2015, expanded criminal acts against law enforcement animals to include offenses against animals used by volunteers acting under the direct supervision of a peace officer.
- AB 2278 (Levine), of the 2015-2015 Legislative Session, would have clarified procedures for notification of animal owners regarding hearings and payment of costs when an animal is seized or impounded. AB 2278 was held in the Senate Appropriations Committee.
- SB 1500 (Lieu), Chapter 598, Statutes of 2012, allows pre-conviction forfeiture of an individual’s seized animals in animal abuse and neglect cases.
- AB 628 (Chen), of the 2017-2018 Legislative Session, would have clarified procedures for notification of animal owners regarding hearings and payment of costs when an animal is seized or impounded. AB 628 was never heard in the Assembly Public Safety Committee.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
California Police Chiefs Association
Social Compassion in Legislation
1 private individual
Opposition
American Civil Liberties Union of California
Chief Probation Officers of California
Analysis Prepared by: David Billingsley / PUB. S. / (916) 319-3744
Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | SB |
THIRD READING
Bill No: SB 1024
:
SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE: 4-1, 4/24/18
AYES: Anderson, Mitchell, Stone, Wiener
NOES: Skinner
NO VOTE RECORDED: Bradford, Jackson
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 7-0, 5/25/18
AYES: Lara, Bates, Beall, Bradford, Hill, Nielsen, Wiener
DIGEST:
This bill requires the court consider an animal owner education course for people convicted of specified offenses and in addition for some of the same offenses a mental health evaluation and possible counseling.
Existing law:
- Provides that any person who sexually assaults any animal for the reason of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of a person is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by up to 6 months in jail and/or a fine of $1,000 plus approximately 310% penalty assessments for a total fine of $4,100. (Penal Code § 268.5)
- Provides that every person who, without the consent of the owner, willfully administers poison to any animal, the property of another, or exposes any poisonous substance, with the intent that the same shall be taken or swallowed by any such animal is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by up to 6 months in jail/and or fine of $1,000 ($4,100 with penalty assessments). (Penal Code § 596)
- Provides that every owner, driver, or keeper of any animal who permits the animal to be in any building, enclosure, lane, street etc. without proper care and attention is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by up to 6 months in jail/and or fine of $1,000 ($4,100 with penalty assessments). (Penal Code § 597.1)
- Provides that every owner, driver, or possessor of any animal who permits the animal to be in any building, enclosure, lane, street, square, or lot of any city, county etc. without proper care and attention shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by up to 6 months in jail/and or fine of $1,000 ($4,100 with penalty assessments). (Penal Code § 597f)
- Provides that any person who injures a police dog or horse is guilty of a misdemeanor or, if the injury is serious, a wobbler. The penalty for the misdemeanors are punishable by up to 6 months in jail/and or fine of $1,000 ($4,100 with penalty assessments). (Penal Code § 600)
- Provides that if a person is granted probation for maliciously and intentionally maiming, mutilating, torturing, wounding or killing an animal, he or she shall order the defendant to complete counseling designed to evaluate and treat behavior or conduct disorders. (Penal Code § 597)
This bill:
- Provides that for every defendant who is convicted of one of specified offenses against animals the court consider ordering the defendant to pay for and complete a responsible animal owner education course. If the defendant is unable to pay for the course the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based on a defendant’s ability to pay.
- Provides that the responsible animal owner education course for persons shall consist of all of the following:
- A minimum of five instructional hours.
- Mechanisms to ensure the minimum hours of instruction have been completed by the participant.
- Attendance shall be verified. If the course is completed online, the course provider shall maintain a system to validate the identity of the person taking the course.
- The course provider shall incorporate a validation process that verifies participant comprehension of course material related to the educational objectives as follows:
- The course provider shall test the participant’s mastery of the course content by asking at least two questions from each major unit or section. The questions shall be multiple choice.
- The questions shall be difficult enough that the answer may not be easily determined without having viewed the contents of the major or unit section.
- The educational objectives of the responsible animal owner course shall include, but not limited to, promotion of all of the following:
- Responsible care concepts for animals, both livestock and non-livestock, including instruction on providing for the health, safety, and welfare of livestock and non-livestock animals and wildlife, including appropriate shelter and housing, the importance of spaying and neutering, and the proper tethering and transportation of animals.
- Responsible pet ownership, including, but not limited to, ensuring the safety of both the community and the animal and bite prevention.
- Respect and observance of federal and state laws that protect livestock and non-livestock animals and bite prevention.
- Respect and observance of federal and state laws that protect livestock and non-livestock animals and wildlife.
- An overview of state and federal laws related to cruelty to livestock and non-livestock animals and animal fighting.
- Appropriate training and discipline tactics for livestock and non-livestock animals.
- Provides that for every defendant who is convicted of specified offenses the court shall consider ordering to a mandatory mental health evaluation by an evaluator chosen by the court.
- Provides that mental health evaluations and any subsequent treatment shall be paid for by the defendant. If the court finds that the defendant is financially unable to pay for that counseling, the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based upon the defendant’s ability to pay.
Background
According to the author:
Currently, sentencing option for animal abuse crimes are limited and judges are afforded little discretion in appropriate treatment or education for offenders. Fines, jail time, probation and forced animal surrender are the primarily utilized options. None of those are particularly well suited to addressing the underlying causes behind animal abuse as observed by law enforcement, mental health and animal welfare experts. The link between animal abuse and violence towards humans is well documented. Offenders who display violence towards animals often commit violent acts towards humans whether it be domestic violence, child abuse or as we saw tragically in Parkland FL this year mass shootings. Mental health intervention early is often the key to stopping this progression and escalation of violent behavior.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: Fiscal Com.: Local: No
According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:
- Unknown, potentially-significant costs to an unspecified entity to certify that courses meet the criteria established by this bill. Initial one-time costs would be larger than ongoing costs, as the unspecified entity would need to study curricula and consult with subject-matter experts in developing standards. (General Fund)
- County Behavior Health Departments: Unknown, potentially-significant costs aggregated among the fifty-eight counties for county mental health departments to conduct a mental health evaluation and provide subsequent treat if chosen by the court to be the provider. Costs would be paid, in full or in part, by the individual who would be undergoing the evaluation and treatment to the extent that the court has determined that he or she could afford to pay. Any costs not covered likely would be reimbursable by the state, the extent of which would be determined by the Commission on State Mandates. (General Fund, local funds)
- Minor and absorbable impact to the court to incorporate changes that would be required by this bill into the sentencing phase. (General Fund*)
Alley Cat Rescue
Animal Friends of the Valleys
Animal Legal Defense Fund
Animals & Society Institute Colorado Voters for Animals
Humane Education Advocates Reaching Teachers
Humane Society of the United States
The Paw Project
Shelter Transport Animal Rescue Team
Social Compassion in Legislation
OPPOSITION: (Verified 5/25/18)
American Civil Liberties Union of California
5/28/18 9:49:08
**** END ****
SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair
2017 - 2018 Regular Session
SB 1024 (Wilk) - Animal abuse: responsible animal owner course: mandatory counseling
Version: May 7, 2018 | Policy Vote: PUB. S. 4 - 1 |
Urgency: No | Mandate: Yes |
Hearing Date: May 25, 2018 | Consultant: Shaun Naidu |
*********** ANALYSIS ADDENDUM – SUSPENSE FILE ***********
The following information is revised to reflect amendments
adopted by the committee on May 25, 2018
Bill Summary:
SB 1024 would allow the court to order people sentenced to probation for specified offenses against animals to complete a responsible animal owner education course, as specified.
Fiscal Impact:
- Unknown, potentially-significant costs to an unspecified entity to certify that courses meet the criteria established by this bill. Initial one-time costs would be larger than ongoing costs, as the unspecified entity would need to study curricula and consult with subject-matter experts in developing standards. (General Fund)
- County Behavior Health Departments: Unknown, potentially-significant costs aggregated among the fifty-eight counties for county mental health departments to conduct a mental health evaluation and provide subsequent treat if chosen by the court to be the provider. Costs would be paid, in full or in part, by the individual who would be undergoing the evaluation and treatment to the extent that the court has determined that he or she could afford to pay. Any costs not covered likely would be reimbursable by the state, the extent of which would be determined by the Commission on State Mandates. (General Fund, local funds)
- Minor and absorbable impact to the court to incorporate changes that would be required by this bill into the sentencing phase. (General Fund*)
*Trial Court Trust Fund
Committee Amendments:
Strike the increase of the fine and provide the court with discretion to order a person to complete a responsible animal owner education course.
-- END --
SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair
2017 - 2018 Regular Session
SB 1024 (Wilk) - Animal abuse: responsible animal owner course: mandatory counseling
Version: May 7, 2018 | Policy Vote: PUB. S. 4 - 1 |
Urgency: No | Mandate: Yes |
Hearing Date: May 14, 2018 | Consultant: Shaun Naidu |
This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.
Bill Summary:
SB 1024 would require people sentenced to probation for specified offenses against animals to complete a responsible animal owner education course, as specified, and would increase the base fine associated for those offenses from $1,000 to $2,000.
Fiscal Impact:
- Unknown, potentially-significant costs to an unspecified entity to certify that courses meet the criteria established by this bill. Initial one-time costs would be larger than ongoing costs, as the unspecified entity would need to study curricula and consult with subject-matter experts in developing standards. (General Fund)
- County Behavior Health Departments: Unknown, potentially-significant costs aggregated among the fifty-eight counties for county mental health departments to conduct a mental health evaluation and provide subsequent treat if chosen by the court to be the provider. Costs would be paid, in full or in part, by the individual who would be undergoing the evaluation and treatment to the extent that the court has determined that he or she could afford to pay. Any costs not covered likely would be reimbursable by the state, the extent of which would be determined by the Commission on State Mandates. (General Fund, local funds)
- Unknown, potential increase in fine and fee revenue to the extent that the increased base fine and the associated fees and assessments are collected. There are indications that the higher a total fine a person owes decreases the likelihood of some individuals paying all or any portion of the amount due. (General Fund, various special funds, local funds)
- Minor and absorbable impact to the court to incorporate changes that would be required by this bill into the sentencing phase. (General Fund*)
*Trial Court Trust Fund
Background:
It is a crime to maliciously and intentionally maim, mutilate, torture, wound, or kill a living animal. It also is a crime to sexually assault an animal, protected as specified, for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of the perpetrator. Additionally, a person is prohibited, without the consent of the owner, from willfully administering poison to an animal, except as provided. These crimes are misdemeanor offenses and are punishable by up to six months imprisonment in the county jail and/or a base fine of up to $1,000. A person who is convicted of such an offense and consequently sentenced to a term of probation must complete and pay for counseling designed to evaluate and treat behavior or conduct disorders, as specified.
Proposed Law:
This bill would:
- Require a defendant sentenced to probation for specified offenses against animals to be ordered to complete a responsible animal owner education course.
- Require the course to, among other things, consist of five instructional hours on specified subjects and test the participant’s mastery of the course.
- Delete the requirement that a defendant sentenced to probation complete counseling and, instead, would require a defendant sentenced to probation for specified offenses against animals to undergo a mandatory mental health evaluation by the county mental health department or another evaluator chosen by the court.
- Increase the base fine associated with specified offenses against animals from $1,000 to $2,000.
-- END --
SENATE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY
Senator Nancy Skinner, Chair
2017 - 2018 Regular
Bill No: SB 1024 Hearing Date: April 24, 2018
Author: | Wilk | ||
Version: | April 2, 2018 | ||
Urgency: | No | Fiscal: | Yes |
Consultant: | MK | ||
Subject: Animal Abuse: Responsible Animal Owner Course: Mandatory Counseling
HISTORY
Source: Author
Prior Legislation: None
Support: Alley Cat Rescue; Animal Friends of the Valleys; Animal Legal Defense Fund; Animals & Society Institute Colorado Voters for Animals; Humane Education Advocates Reaching Teachers (HEART); Humane Society of the United States; The Paw Project; Shelter Transport Animal Rescue Team (START); Social Compassion in Legslation
Opposition: American Civil Liberties Union of California
PURPOSE
The purpose of this bill is to require an animal owner education course for people convicted of specified offenses and in addition for some of the same offenses a mental health evaluation and possible counseling. In addition this bill raises the fine for specified animal abuse misdemeanors to $2,000.
Existing law provides that any person who sexually assaults any animal for the reason of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of a person is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by up to 6 months in jail and/or a fine of $1,000 plus approximately 310% penalty assessments for a total fine of $4,100. (Penal Code § 268.5)
This bill would instead provide that fine for the above violation would be up to $2,000, with penalty assessments $8,200.
Existing law provides that every person who, without the consent of the owner, willfully administers poison to any animal, the property of another, or exposes any poisonous substance, with the intent that the same shall be taken or swallowed by any such animal is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by up to 6 months in jail/and or fine of $1,000 ($4,100 with penalty assessments). (Penal Code § 596)
This bill would instead provide that fine for the above violation would be up to $2,000, with penalty assessments $8,200.
Existing law provides that every owner, driver, or keeper of any animal who permits the animal to be in any building, enclosure, lane, street etc. without proper care and attention is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by up to 6 months in jail/and or fine of $1,000 ($4,100 with penalty assessments). (Penal Code § 597.1)
This bill would instead provide that fine for the above violation would be up to $2,000, with penalty assessments $8,200.
Existing law provides that every owner, driver, or possessor of any animal who permits the animal to be in any building, enclosure, lane, street, square, or lot of any city, county etc. without proper care and attention shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by up to 6 months in jail/and or fine of $1,000 ($4,100 with penalty assessments). (Penal Code § 597f)
This bill would instead provide that fine for the above violation would be up to $2,000, with penalty assessments $8,200.
Existing law provides that any person who injures a police dog or horse is guilty of a misdemeanor or, if the injury is serious, a wobbler. The penalty for the misdemeanors are punishable by up to 6 months in jail/and or fine of $1,000 ($4,100 with penalty assessments). (Penal Code § 600)
This bill would instead provide that fine for the above misdemeanor violations would be up to $2,000, with penalty assessments $8,200.
Existing law provides that if a person is granted probation for maliciously and intentionally maiming, mutilating, torturing, wounding or killing an animal, he or she shall order the defendant to complete counseling designed to evaluate and treat behavior or conduct disorders. (Penal Code § 597)
This bill deletes the counseling and treatment requirement.
This bill provides that every defendant who is convicted of one of specified offenses against animals shall be ordered to pay for and complete a responsible animal owner education course. If the defendant is unable to pay for the course the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based on a defendant’s ability to pay. An indigent defendant may negotiate a deferred payment schedule but shall pay a nominal fee if the defendant has the ability to pay the nominal fee.
This bill provides that the responsible animal owner education course for persons shall consist of all of the following:
- A minimum of five instructional hours.
- Mechanisms to ensure the minimum hours of instruction have been completed by the participant.
- Attendance shall be verified. If the course is completed online, the course provider shall maintain a system to validate the identity of the person taking the course.
- The course provider shall incorporate a validation process that verifies participant comprehension of course material related to the educational objectives as follows:
- The course provider shall test the participant’s mastery of the course content by asking at least two questions from each major unit or section. The questions shall be multiple choice.
- The questions shall be difficult enough that the answer may not be easily determined without having viewed the contents of the major or unit section.
- The educational objectives of the responsible animal owner course shall include, but not limited to, promotion of all of the following:
- Responsible care concepts for animals, both livestock and non-livestock, including instruction on providing for the health, safety, and welfare of livestock and non-livestock animals and wildlife, including appropriate shelter and housing, the importance of spaying and neutering, and the proper tethering and transportation of animals.
- Responsible pet ownership, including, but not limited to, ensuring the safety of both the community and the animal and bite prevention.
- Respect and observance of federal and state laws that protect livestock and non-livestock animals and bite prevention.
- Respect and observance of federal and state laws that protect livestock and non-livestock animals and wildlife.
- An overview of state and federal laws related to cruelty to livestock and non-livestock animals and animal fighting.
- Appropriate training and discipline tactics for livestock and non-livestock animals.
- All responsible owner education courses for persons convicted of an offense specified shall be reviewed and certified by the State Department of Health Services. Each applicant for course certification shall be accompanied by a course outline that identifies the educational objectives outlined and the amount of time allotted for each educational objective.
- The educational objectives of the responsible animal owner course shall include, but not limited to, promotion of all of the following:
This bill provides that every defendant who is convicted of specified offenses shall be subject to a mandatory mental health evaluation.
This bill provides that upon the evaluation, if the evaluating mental health professional deems it necessary, the defendant shall complete mandatory counseling.
This bill provides that mental health evaluations and any subsequent treatment shall be paid for by the defendant. If the court finds that the defendant is financially unable to pay for that counseling, the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based upon the defendant’s ability to pay. And indigent defendant may negotiate a deferred payment schedule, but shall pay a nominal fee if the defendant has the ability to pay the nominal fee.
This bill provides that the mental health evaluation shall be completed within 90 days of the conviction or at the soonest time deemed appropriate by the court, unless the defendant is sentenced to imprisonment in which case the mental health evaluation shall be completed within 90 days of release or at the soonest time deemed appropriate by the court.
This bill provides that if the offender is referred to counseling, he or she shall begin counseling with 90 days or at the soonest time deemed appropriate by the court and shall submit proof of completion of the court.
This bill provides that failure to complete these requirements shall result in termination of any diversion program, probation, mandatory supervision, or postrelease community supervision.
COMMENTS
1. Need for This Bill
According to the author:
Currently, sentencing option for animal abuse crimes are limited and judges are afforded little discretion in appropriate treatment or education for offenders. Fines, jail time, probation and forced animal surrender are the primarily utilized options. None of those are particularly well suited to addressing the underlying causes behind animal abuse as observed by law enforcement, mental health and animal welfare experts. The link between animal abuse and violence towards humans is well documented. Offenders who display violence towards animals often commit violent acts towards humans whether it be domestic violence, child abuse or as we saw tragically in Parkland FL this year mass shootings. Mental health intervention early is often the key to stopping this progression and escalation of violent behavior.
2. Animal Owner Education Course
This bill provides that a person convicted of one of 29 animal abuse related offenses will be required to take a responsible animal owner education course. The bill specifies the requirement of the course and states that the State Department of Health Care Services shall certify the courses.
- Course required for all convictions
This bill requires anyone convicted of the listed offenses to take the course. Generally such courses are required as a condition of probation. How will it work if a person is sentenced to jail or prison and serves their entire sentence? The court will no longer have jurisdiction over the person to enforce the taking of the course. Should the course only be given as a condition of probation? In addition some of the violations have infractions. How will the education course be enforced for someone with an infraction?
- Payment for the course
This bill specifically says that the if the court find the defendant is unable to pay the costs of the course the court may develop a sliding fee schedule based on the defendant’s ability to pay or if the defendant is indigent may “negotiate a deferred payment schedule.” What would a deferred payment schedule look like? If this course is a condition of probation would a person who is indigent not be able to have been deemed to have completed this condition of probation until full payment is made even if the course had been completed months before? Should it be clear that the inability to pay should not result in a person serving a longer probation period?
- Certification of courses
This bill outlines some of the basic requirements of the required course including a minimum of 5 instructional hours, ability to verify attendance and basic educational objectives. The bill provides that the State Department of Health Care Services should certify the courses that identify the educational objectives. Do these courses exist currently and if so how many different courses? Is the Department of Health Care Services the appropriate entity to certify the courses?
- Do education courses work?
Is there evidence that these types of courses would reduce recidivism? Would this help for all offenders or just those who committed an offense out of ignorance? Some people are banned from keeping animals as a result of their offense, are courses appropriate for these people?
3. Mental health evaluation
This bill would require people convicted of specified animal abuse offenses ranging from infractions to wobblers to receive a mental health evaluation and if deemed necessary complete mandatory counseling. Failure to complete the mandatory evaluation/counseling will result in termination of any diversion program, probation mandatory supervision or postrelease community supervision.
- Mental health evaluation for all convictions.
Anyone convicted of one of 8 animal abuse offenses will be required to have a mental health evaluation. This is required even if a person is sentenced to jail or prison and specifically states that if the person is incarcerated the evaluation shall be completed within 90 days after release “or the soonest time deemed appropriate by the court.” Any counseling shall also begin within 90 days, it is unclear if that is 90 days from release or 90 days from the evaluation.
As with the education class, it is not clear how this will work with someone who is not on probation. How will the court enforce the mental health evaluation and treatment after a person has been released from custody? Should this requirement apply only to those who are sentenced to probation or some blended sentence?
In addition, Penal Code Section 600.2, one of the sections for which a mental health evaluation will be required, includes two infractions. How will the mental health evaluation requirement work with infractions?
- Who will provide the services?
Who will do the mental health evaluations? Does the author contemplate that it will be the county mental health that will do the evaluations? If so do they have the capacity? Or will people have to seek a private evaluation? If private mental health evaluators will be used and since the evaluation has to occur within 90 days will people be given a list of possible evaluators?
- Cost of evaluation.
As with the education course, the bill specifies that the person will be required to pay for the mental health evaluation. Those convicted of all of the offenses requiring the mental health evaluation also will be required to take the education course. The bill specifies that if the court finds the defendant is financially unable to pay for counseling the court may develop a sliding fee or deferred payment schedule. As with the education course, the deferred payment schedule may result in an indigent person remaining on probation for a longer period of time than those who are capable of paying. If private counseling is used, how will the court control the payment schedule? How often will a person just coming out of jail or prison not be indigent?
- Does counseling reduce recidivism?
Is there specific counseling that has been shown to reduce recidivism in these types of cases? If the animal abuse is a result of a mental illness, what types of counseling should a person have? Could a person go to any therapist who will see them or is a specific type of therapy going to be required?
4. Increased Fine
This bill increases the misdemeanor fine from $1,000 to $2,000 on a number of animal abuse related offenses. With the approximate 310% penalty assessments the current fine is currently approximately $4,100 and the new fine will be approximately $8,200. Someone convicted of one of these offenses will also be required to take the education course and have the mental health evaluation under this bill. Should the fine be increased along with the increased fees to be paid for the course and evaluation?
-- END –
Discussed in Hearing
Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety
Senate Floor
Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
Senate Standing Committee on Public Safety
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):