AB 171: Department of Veterans Affairs: veterans’ services.
- Session Year: 2015-2016
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2015-08-31
Existing law requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to disburse funds, appropriated to the department for the purpose of supporting county veterans service officers pursuant to the annual Budget Act, on a pro rata basis, to counties a county that comply complies with certain conditions.
This bill would appropriate on an annual basis the sum of $5,600,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Veterans Affairs to be available for allocation to counties to fund the activities of county veterans service officers, as specified. The bill would specify that the money appropriated would only be available for encumbrance and expenditure for one year. The bill would require the department, no later than July 1, 2016, to develop an allocation formula based upon performance standards that encourage innovation and reward outstanding service by county veterans service officers, and would require those continuously appropriated moneys to be allocated allocated, upon appropriation by the Legislature, in accordance with that formula, as specified. The bill would require the department to annually report to the Legislature the efficacy, return on investment, work volume, and regional impact of the subvention funds on each county that receives those funds, as specified. The bill would also delete obsolete provisions and would make conforming changes.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Existing law requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to disburse funds, appropriated to the department for the purpose of supporting county veterans service officers pursuant to the annual Budget Act, on a pro rata basis, to counties that comply with certain conditions.
This bill would continuously appropriate on an annual basis the sum of $5,600,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Veterans Affairs to be available for allocation to counties to fund the activities of county veterans service officers, as specified. The bill would specify that the money appropriated would only be available for encumbrance and expenditure for one year. The bill would require the department, no later than July 1, 2016, to develop an allocation formula based upon performance standards that encourage innovation and reward outstanding service by county veterans service officers, and would require those continuously appropriated moneys to be allocated in accordance with that formula, as specified. The bill would also delete obsolete provisions and would make conforming changes.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Existing law requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to disburse funds, appropriated to the department for the purpose of supporting county veterans service officers pursuant to the annual Budget Act, on a pro rata basis, to counties that comply with certain conditions.
This bill would continuously appropriate the sum of $5,600,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Veterans Affairs to be available for allocation to counties to fund the activities of county veterans service officers, as specified. The bill would require the department, no later than July 1, 2016, to develop an allocation formula based upon performance standards that encourage innovation and reward outstanding service by county veterans service officers, and would require those continuously appropriated moneys to be allocated in accordance with that formula, as specified. The bill would also delete obsolete provisions and would make conforming changes.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Existing law requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to disburse funds, appropriated to the department for the purpose of supporting county veterans service officers pursuant to the annual Budget Act, on a pro rata basis, to counties that comply with certain conditions.
This bill would continuously appropriate the sum of $5,600,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Veterans Affairs to be available for allocation to counties to fund the activities of county veterans service officers, as specified. The bill would require the department, no later than July 1, 2016, to develop an allocation formula based upon performance standards that encourage innovation and reward outstanding service by county veterans service officers, and would require those continuously appropriated moneys to be allocated in accordance with that formula, as specified. The bill would also delete obsolete provisions and would make conforming changes.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
(a)The sum of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) is hereby appropriated from the General Fund to the Department of Veterans Affairs for allocation, during the 198990 fiscal year, for purposes of funding the activities of county veterans service officers pursuant to this section. Funds for allocation in future years shall be as provided in the annual Budget Act.
(b)Funds shall be disbursed each fiscal year on a pro rata basis to counties that have established and maintain a county veterans service officer in accordance with the staffing level and workload of each county veterans service officer under a formula based upon performance that shall be developed by the Department of Veterans Affairs for these purposes, and that shall allocate county funds in any fiscal year for county veterans service officers in an amount not less than the amount allocated in the 198889 fiscal year.
(c)The department shall annually determine the amount of new or increased monetary benefits paid to eligible veterans by the federal government attributable to the assistance of county veterans service officers. The department shall, on or before October 1 of each year, prepare and transmit its determination for the preceding fiscal year to the Department of Finance and the Legislature. The Department of Finance shall review the departments determination in time to use the information in the annual Budget Act for the budget of the department for the next fiscal year.
(d)(1)The Legislature finds and declares that 50 percent of the amount annually budgeted for county veterans service officers is approximately eleven million dollars ($11,000,000). The Legislature further finds and declares that it is an efficient and reasonable use of state funds to increase the annual budget for county veterans service officers in an amount not to exceed eleven million dollars ($11,000,000) if it is justified by the monetary benefits to the states veterans attributable to the effort of these officers.
(2)It is the intent of the Legislature, after reviewing the departments determination in subdivision (c), to consider an increase in the annual budget for county veterans service officers in an amount not to exceed five million dollars ($5,000,000), if the monetary benefits to the states veterans attributable to the assistance of county veteran service officers justify that increase in the budget.
(e)This section shall become operative January 1, 2016.
SEC. 2.Section 972.1 is added to the Military and Veterans Code, to read:972.1.(a)The Department of Veterans Affairs shall, no later than July 1, 2016, develop an allocation formula based upon performance standards that encourage innovation and reward outstanding service by county veterans service officers. Upon appropriation by the Legislature of moneys for this purpose, the moneys shall be allocated each fiscal year in accordance with that formula among only those counties that, in the discretion of the secretary, comply with the following requirements:
(1)Establish and maintain a county veterans service officer, pursuant to Section 970.
(2)Collect and report all information required by the department in accordance with departmental regulations.
(3)Comply with the training and accreditation standards for county veterans service officers and veteran service representatives as may be set by the department.
(4)Require county veterans service officers and veteran service representatives to become accredited with the department for the purpose of providing representation services to claimants before the United States Department of Veterans Affairs within 18 months of the commencement of his or her employment, or on or before June 1, 2017, whichever date is later.
(b)The department shall annually report to the Legislature the efficacy, return on investment, work volume, and regional impact of the subvention funds on each county that receives those funds. The department shall, in addition to the requirements of Section 974, annually determine information including, but not limited to, the following:
(1)The amount of new or increased monetary benefits paid to eligible veterans by the federal government attributable to the assistance of county veterans service officers and the basis for that determination.
(2)The amount paid to each county, including the amounts paid to each county for each category of workload unit included in the allocation formula.
(3)An evaluation as to each countys use of subvention funds, including recommendations for improvement of each countys use of subvention funds.
(c)The department shall, on or before October 1 of each year, prepare and transmit its determination for the preceding fiscal year to the Department of Finance and the Legislature. The Department of Finance shall review the departments determination in time to use the information in the annual Budget Act for the budget of the department for the next fiscal year. The department may combine this report with the report required by Section 974.
(d)For the purposes of this section, workload unit means a specific claim activity that is used to allocate subvention funds to counties, which is approved by the department, and performed by county veterans service officers.
(e)It is the intent of the Legislature that the department revise the allocation formula pursuant to this section on a regular basis to adjust for changes in veteran demographics and veteran needs.
SECTION 1.The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)The recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan are creating an entirely new generation of veterans who may be eligible for federal veterans benefits because of their war service and their physical and mental conditions.
(b)Californians make up to 10 percent of the federal military forces used in these conflicts. Furthermore, the California National Guard and California-based reserve units have contributed significantly to these current conflicts.
(c)Many of these returning California veterans are not aware of the federal and state benefits that are available to them.
(d)Additionally, it is estimated that in California there may be over two million veterans, and their widows or widowers, who are unaware that they may be eligible for pensions from the federal government based upon their, or their spouses, past military service in World War II, Korea, Vietnam, or the Gulf War.
(e)Californias county veterans service officers are the initial local point of contact for claimants accessing the United States Department of Veterans Affairs.
(f)The costs of maintaining county veterans service officers are shared from county general funds and state reimbursement to the counties. In 1997, in order to track performance, the Legislature enacted and the Governor signed into law Senate Bill 608, enacted as Chapter 318 of the Statutes of 1997, which required the California Department of Veterans Affairs to annually report the amount of monetary benefits paid to veterans by the federal government that were attributable to the assistance of county veterans service officers. Senate Bill 608 also required the Department of Finance to consider an increase in the annual budget for county veterans service officers of up to $5 million, if approved in the annual budget process. In 2009, the Legislature enacted and the Governor signed into law Senate Bill 419 enacted as Chapter 183 of the Statutes of 2009, which raised this amount to $11 million, if approved in the annual budget process.
(g)As a result of this annual reporting, by the end of 2013, it had been determined that from 1995 to 2013, inclusive, the state had cumulatively budgeted $41.4 million for its share of the cost of the county veterans service officers. As a result of this investment, county veteran service officers were able to assist local veterans in obtaining $4.1 billion, in new federal moneys. This is a return of about $98 for every $1 the state allocates to county veterans service officers. Furthermore, the $4.1 billion only reflects the actual monetary benefits qualified for in a given year. The monetary benefits qualified for in prior years are not tracked, yet the veterans and their dependents may continue to receive those benefits for the rest of their lives. Added to this stellar return on the states investment, but not counted in the annual reporting, are the Medi-Cal cost avoidance savings incurred as a result of county veterans service officers qualifying and shifting veterans away from Medi-Cal and into the appropriate federal veterans program.
(h)The county veterans service officers had accomplished all of this without ever reaching the allowable state budget allocation of $11 million, set in 2009. To date, the county veterans service officers have not received more than $5.6 million per year from the state.
(i)It is critical that the county veterans service officers receive a steady stream of funding because there continues to be a large number of underserved veterans and their dependents who are not aware of the federal benefits available to them as a result of their military service. Studies from other states have shown that increases in county veterans service officers have resulted in larger amounts of federal moneys to veterans. These new federal moneys and benefits are paid directly from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs to the qualifying veteran or their dependent and are used in the local economy.
SEC. 2.Section 972.1 of the Military and Veterans Code, as amended by Section 3 of Chapter 401 of the Statutes of 2012, is amended to read:972.1.(a)Funds shall be disbursed each fiscal year on a pro rata basis to counties that have established and maintain a county veterans service officer in accordance with the staffing level and workload of each county veterans service officer under a formula based upon performance that shall be developed by the Department of Veterans Affairs for these purposes.
(1)For the purposes of this section, workload unit means a specific claim activity that is used to allocate subvention funds to counties, which is approved by the department, and performed by county veterans service officers.
(2)For the purposes of this subdivision, the department, by June 30, 2013, shall develop a performance-based formula that will incentivize county veterans service officers to perform workload units that help veterans access federal compensation and pension benefits and other benefits, in order to maximize the amount of federal money received by California veterans.
(b)The department shall annually determine the amount of new or increased monetary benefits paid to eligible veterans by the federal government attributable to the assistance of county veterans service officers. The department shall, on or before October 1 of each year, prepare and transmit its determination for the preceding fiscal year to the Department of Finance and the Legislature. The Department of Finance shall review the departments determination in time to use the information in the annual Budget Act for the budget of the department for the next fiscal year.
(c)The department shall conduct a review of the high-performing and low-performing county veterans service officers, and, based on this review, shall produce a best-practices manual for county veterans service officers by June 30, 2013.
(d)The Legislature finds and declares that it is an efficient and reasonable use of state funds to increase the annual budget for county veterans service officers up to a total of eleven million dollars ($11,000,000) if it is justified by the monetary benefits to the states veterans attributable to the effort of these officers.
(e)This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2016, and as of that date is repealed.
SEC. 3.Section 972.1 of the Military and Veterans Code, as amended by Section 2 of Chapter 401 of the Statutes of 2012, is amended to read:972.1.(a)Funds shall be disbursed each fiscal year on a pro rata basis to counties that have established and maintain a county veterans service officer in accordance with the staffing level and workload of each county veterans service officer under a formula based upon performance that shall be developed by the Department of Veterans Affairs for these purposes, and that shall allocate county funds in any fiscal year for county veterans service officers in an amount not less than five million six hundred thousand dollars ($5,600,000).
(b)The department shall annually determine the amount of new or increased monetary benefits paid to eligible veterans by the federal government attributable to the assistance of county veterans service officers. The department shall, on or before October 1 of each year, prepare and transmit its determination for the preceding fiscal year to the Department of Finance and the Legislature. The Department of Finance shall review the departments determination in time to use the information in the annual Budget Act for the budget of the department for the next fiscal year.
(c)The Legislature finds and declares that it is an efficient and reasonable use of state funds to increase the annual budget for county veterans service officers up to a total of eleven million dollars ($11,000,000) if it is justified by the monetary benefits to the states veterans attributable to the effort of these officers.
(d)This section shall become operative January 1, 2016.
SEC. 4.Section 972.3 is added to the Military and Veterans Code, to read:972.3.(a)Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government Code, the sum of five million six hundred thousand dollars ($5,600,000) is hereby appropriated annually from the General Fund each fiscal year commencing July 1, 2015, to the Department of Veterans Affairs to be available for allocation to counties to fund the activities of county veterans service officers pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 972.1. Moneys appropriated pursuant to this subdivision shall only be available for encumbrance and expenditure for one year after the date upon which it first becomes available for encumbrance.
(b)The Department of Veterans Affairs shall, no later than July 1, 2016, develop an allocation formula based upon performance standards that encourage innovation and reward outstanding service by county veterans service officers. Moneys appropriated for this purpose shall be allocated each fiscal year in accordance with that formula among those counties that have established and maintained a county veterans service officer pursuant to Section 970.
SEC. 5.This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
Approximately 50 percent of the current General Fund appropriation in support of county veteran service offices operations expires on June 30, 2015. In order to provide for continuity of services critical to the successful reintegration of Californias veterans, to increase Californias utilization of veteran benefits, and to ensure veterans claims for benefits are processed in a timely manner, it is necessary that this act take effect immediately.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)The recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan are creating an entirely new generation of veterans who may be eligible for federal veterans benefits because of their war service and their physical and mental conditions.
(b)Californians make up to 10 percent of the federal military forces used in these conflicts. Furthermore, the California National Guard and California-based reserve units have contributed significantly to these current conflicts.
(c)Many of these returning California veterans are not aware of the federal and state benefits that are available to them.
(d)Additionally, it is estimated that in California there may be over two million veterans, and their widows or widowers, who are unaware that they may be eligible for pensions from the federal government based upon their, or their spouses, past military service in World War II, Korea, Vietnam, or the Gulf War.
(e)Californias county veterans service officers are the initial local point of contact for claimants accessing the United States Department of Veterans Affairs.
(f)The costs of maintaining county veterans service officers are shared from county general funds and state reimbursement to the counties. In 1997, in order to track performance, the Legislature enacted and the Governor signed into law Senate Bill 608, enacted as Chapter 318 of the Statutes of 1997, which required the California Department of Veterans Affairs to annually report the amount of monetary benefits paid to veterans by the federal government that were attributable to the assistance of county veterans service officers. Senate Bill 608 also required the Department of Finance to consider an increase in the annual budget for county veterans service officers of up to $5 million, if approved in the annual budget process. In 2009, the Legislature enacted and the Governor signed into law Senate Bill 419 enacted as Chapter 183 of the Statutes of 2009, which raised this amount to $11 million, if approved in the annual budget process.
(g)As a result of this annual reporting, by the end of 2013, it had been determined that from 1995 to 2013, inclusive, the state had cumulatively budgeted $41.4 million for its share of the cost of the county veterans service officers. As a result of this investment, county veteran service officers were able to assist local veterans in obtaining $4.1 billion, in new federal moneys. This is a return of about $98 for every $1 the state allocates to county veterans service officers. Furthermore, the $4.1 billion only reflects the actual monetary benefits qualified for in a given year. The monetary benefits qualified for in prior years are not tracked, yet the veterans and their dependents may continue to receive those benefits for the rest of their lives. Added to this stellar return on the states investment, but not counted in the annual reporting, are the Medi-Cal cost avoidance savings incurred as a result of county veterans service officers qualifying and shifting veterans away from Medi-Cal and into the appropriate federal veterans program.
(h)The county veterans service officers had accomplished all of this without ever reaching the allowable state budget allocation of $11 million, set in 2009. To date, the county veterans service officers have not received more than $5.6 million per year from the state.
(i)It is critical that the county veterans service officers receive a steady stream of funding because there continues to be a large number of underserved veterans and their dependents who are not aware of the federal benefits available to them as a result of their military service. Studies from other states have shown that increases in county veterans service officers have resulted in larger amounts of federal moneys to veterans. These new federal moneys and benefits are paid directly from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs to the qualifying veteran or their dependent and are used in the local economy.
SEC. 2.Section 972.1 of the Military and Veterans Code, as amended by Section 3 of Chapter 401 of the Statutes of 2012, is amended to read:972.1.(a)Funds shall be disbursed each fiscal year on a pro rata basis to counties that have established and maintain a county veterans service officer in accordance with the staffing level and workload of each county veterans service officer under a formula based upon performance that shall be developed by the Department of Veterans Affairs for these purposes.
(1)For the purposes of this section, workload unit means a specific claim activity that is used to allocate subvention funds to counties, which is approved by the department, and performed by county veterans service officers.
(2)For the purposes of this subdivision, the department, by June 30, 2013, shall develop a performance-based formula that will incentivize county veterans service officers to perform workload units that help veterans access federal compensation and pension benefits and other benefits, in order to maximize the amount of federal money received by California veterans.
(b)The department shall annually determine the amount of new or increased monetary benefits paid to eligible veterans by the federal government attributable to the assistance of county veterans service officers. The department shall, on or before October 1 of each year, prepare and transmit its determination for the preceding fiscal year to the Department of Finance and the Legislature. The Department of Finance shall review the departments determination in time to use the information in the annual Budget Act for the budget of the department for the next fiscal year.
(c)The department shall conduct a review of the high-performing and low-performing county veterans service officers, and and, based on this review, shall produce a best-practices manual for county veterans service officers by June 30, 2013.
(d)The Legislature finds and declares that it is an efficient and reasonable use of state funds to increase the annual budget for county veterans service officers up to a total of eleven million dollars ($11,000,000) if it is justified by the monetary benefits to the states veterans attributable to the effort of these officers.
(e)This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2016, and as of that date is repealed.
SEC. 3.Section 972.1 of the Military and Veterans Code, as amended by Section 2 of Chapter 401 of the Statutes of 2012, is amended to read:972.1.(a)Funds shall be disbursed each fiscal year on a pro rata basis to counties that have established and maintain a county veterans service officer in accordance with the staffing level and workload of each county veterans service officer under a formula based upon performance that shall be developed by the Department of Veterans Affairs for these purposes, and that shall allocate county funds in any fiscal year for county veterans service officers in an amount not less than five million six hundred thousand dollars ($5,600,000).
(b)The department shall annually determine the amount of new or increased monetary benefits paid to eligible veterans by the federal government attributable to the assistance of county veterans service officers. The department shall, on or before October 1 of each year, prepare and transmit its determination for the preceding fiscal year to the Department of Finance and the Legislature. The Department of Finance shall review the departments determination in time to use the information in the annual Budget Act for the budget of the department for the next fiscal year.
(c)The Legislature finds and declares that it is an efficient and reasonable use of state funds to increase the annual budget for county veterans service officers up to a total of eleven million dollars ($11,000,000) if it is justified by the monetary benefits to the states veterans attributable to the effort of these officers.
(d)This section shall become operative January 1, 2016.
SEC. 4.Section 972.3 is added to the Military and Veterans Code, to read:972.3.(a)Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government Code, the sum of five million six hundred thousand dollars ($5,600,000) is hereby continuously appropriated annually from the General Fund each fiscal year commencing July 1, 2015, to the Department of Veterans Affairs to be available for allocation to counties to fund the activities of county veterans service officers pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 972.1. Moneys appropriated pursuant to this subdivision shall only be available for encumbrance and expenditure for one year after the date upon which it first becomes available for encumbrance.
(b)The Department of Veterans Affairs shall, no later than July 1, 2016, develop an allocation formula based upon performance standards that encourage innovation and reward outstanding service by county veterans service officers. Moneys appropriated for this purpose shall be allocated each fiscal year in accordance with that formula among those counties that have established and maintained a county veterans service officer pursuant to Section 970.
SEC. 5.This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
Approximately 50 percent of the current General Fund appropriation in support of county veteran service offices operations expires on June 30, 2015. In order to provide for continuity of services critical to the successful reintegration of Californias veterans, to increase Californias utilization of veteran benefits, and to ensure veterans claims for benefits are processed in a timely manner, it is necessary that this act take effect immediately.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)The recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan are creating an entirely new generation of veterans who may be eligible for federal veterans benefits because of their war service and their physical and mental conditions.
(b)Californians make up to 10 percent of the federal military forces used in these conflicts. Furthermore, the California National Guard and California-based reserve units have contributed significantly to these current conflicts.
(c)Many of these returning California veterans are not aware of the federal and state benefits that are available to them.
(d)Additionally, it is estimated that in California there may be over two million veterans, and their widows or widowers, who are unaware that they may be eligible for pensions from the federal government based upon their, or their spouses, past military service in World War II, Korea, Vietnam, or the Gulf War.
(e)Californias county veterans service officers are the initial local point of contact for claimants accessing the United States Department of Veterans Affairs.
(f)The costs of maintaining county veterans service officers are shared from county general funds and state reimbursement to the counties. In 1997, in order to track performance, the Legislature enacted and the Governor signed into law Senate Bill 608, enacted as Chapter 318 of the Statutes of 1997, which required the California Department of Veterans Affairs to annually report the amount of monetary benefits paid to veterans by the federal government that were attributable to the assistance of county veterans service officers. Senate Bill 608 also required the Department of Finance to consider an increase in the annual budget for county veterans service officers of up to $5 million, if approved in the annual budget process. In 2009, the Legislature enacted and the Governor signed into law Senate Bill 419 enacted as Chapter 183 of the Statutes of 2009, which raised this amount to $11 million, if approved in the annual budget process.
(g)As a result of this annual reporting, by the end of 2013, it had been determined that from 1995 to 2013, inclusive, the state had cumulatively budgeted $41.4 million for its share of the cost of the county veterans service officers. As a result of this investment, county veteran service officers were able to assist local veterans in obtaining $4.1 billion, in new federal moneys. This is a return of about $98 for every $1 the state allocates to county veterans service officers. Furthermore, the $4.1 billion only reflects the actual monetary benefits qualified for in a given year. The monetary benefits qualified for in prior years are not tracked, yet the veterans and their dependents may continue to receive those benefits for the rest of their lives. Added to this stellar return on the states investment, but not counted in the annual reporting, are the Medi-Cal cost avoidance savings incurred as a result of county veterans service officers qualifying and shifting veterans away from Medi-Cal and into the appropriate federal veterans program.
(h)The county veterans service officers had accomplished all of this without ever reaching the allowable state budget allocation of $11 million, set in 2009. To date, the county veterans service officers have not received more than $5.6 million per year from the state.
(i)It is critical that the county veterans service officers receive a steady stream of funding because there continues to be a large number of underserved veterans and their dependents who are not aware of the federal benefits available to them as a result of their military service. Studies from other states have shown that increases in county veterans service officers have resulted in larger amounts of federal moneys to veterans. These new federal moneys and benefits are paid directly from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs to the qualifying veteran or their dependent and are used in the local economy.
SEC. 2.Section 972.1 of the Military and Veterans Code, as amended by Section 3 of Chapter 401 of the Statutes of 2012, is amended to read:972.1.(a)Funds shall be disbursed each fiscal year on a pro rata basis to counties that have established and maintain a county veterans service officer in accordance with the staffing level and workload of each county veterans service officer under a formula based upon performance that shall be developed by the Department of Veterans Affairs for these purposes.
(1)For the purposes of this section, workload unit means a specific claim activity that is used to allocate subvention funds to counties, which is approved by the department, and performed by county veterans service officers.
(2)For the purposes of this subdivision, the department, by June 30, 2013, shall develop a performance-based formula that will incentivize county veterans service officers to perform workload units that help veterans access federal compensation and pension benefits and other benefits, in order to maximize the amount of federal money received by California veterans.
(b)The department shall annually determine the amount of new or increased monetary benefits paid to eligible veterans by the federal government attributable to the assistance of county veterans service officers. The department shall, on or before October 1 of each year, prepare and transmit its determination for the preceding fiscal year to the Department of Finance and the Legislature. The Department of Finance shall review the departments determination in time to use the information in the annual Budget Act for the budget of the department for the next fiscal year.
(c)The department shall conduct a review of the high-performing and low-performing county veterans service officers officers, and based on this review, shall produce a best-practices manual for county veterans service officers by June 30, 2013.
(d)The Legislature finds and declares that it is an efficient and reasonable use of state funds to increase the annual budget for county veterans service officers up to a total of eleven million dollars ($11,000,000) if it is justified by the monetary benefits to the states veterans attributable to the effort of these officers.
(e)This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2016, and as of that date is repealed.
SEC. 3.Section 972.1 of the Military and Veterans Code, as amended by Section 2 of Chapter 401 of the Statutes of 2012, is amended to read:972.1.(a)Funds shall be disbursed each fiscal year on a pro rata basis to counties that have established and maintain a county veterans service officer in accordance with the staffing level and workload of each county veterans service officer under a formula based upon performance that shall be developed by the Department of Veterans Affairs for these purposes, and that shall allocate county funds in any fiscal year for county veterans service officers in an amount not less than five million six hundred thousand dollars ($5,600,000).
(b)The department shall annually determine the amount of new or increased monetary benefits paid to eligible veterans by the federal government attributable to the assistance of county veterans service officers. The department shall, on or before October 1 of each year, prepare and transmit its determination for the preceding fiscal year to the Department of Finance and the Legislature. The Department of Finance shall review the departments determination in time to use the information in the annual Budget Act for the budget of the department for the next fiscal year.
(c)The Legislature finds and declares that it is an efficient and reasonable use of state funds to increase the annual budget for county veterans service officers up to a total of eleven million dollars ($11,000,000) if it is justified by the monetary benefits to the states veterans attributable to the effort of these officers.
(d)This section shall become operative January 1, 2016.
SEC. 4.Section 972.3 is added to the Military and Veterans Code, to read:972.3.(a)Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government Code, the sum of five million six hundred thousand dollars ($5,600,000) is hereby continuously appropriated from the General Fund each fiscal year commencing July 1, 2015, to the Department of Veterans Affairs to be available for allocation to counties to fund the activities of county veterans service officers pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 972.1.
(b)The Department of Veterans Affairs shall, no later than July 1, 2016, develop an allocation formula based upon performance standards that encourage innovation and reward outstanding service by county veterans service officers. Moneys appropriated for this purpose shall be allocated each fiscal year in accordance with that formula among those counties that have established and maintained a county veterans service officer pursuant to Section 970.
SEC. 5.This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
Approximately 50 percent of the current General Fund appropriation in support of county veteran service offices operations expires on June 30, 2015. In order to provide for continuity of services critical to the successful reintegration of Californias veterans, to increase Californias utilization of veteran benefits, and to ensure veterans claims for benefits are processed in a timely manner, it is necessary that this act take effect immediately.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)The recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan are creating an entirely new generation of veterans who may be eligible for federal veterans benefits because of their war service and their physical and mental conditions.
(b)Californians make up to 10 percent of the federal military forces used in these conflicts. Furthermore, the California National Guard and California-based reserve units have contributed significantly to these current conflicts.
(c)Many of these returning California veterans are not aware of the federal and state benefits that are available to them.
(d)Additionally, it is estimated that in California there may be over two million veterans, and their widows or widowers, who are unaware that they may be eligible for pensions from the federal government based upon their, or their spouses, past military service in World War II, Korea, Vietnam, or the Gulf War.
(e)Californias county veterans service officers are the initial local point of contact for claimants accessing the United States Department of Veterans Affairs.
(f)The costs of maintaining county veterans service officers are shared from county general funds and state reimbursement to the counties. In 1997, in order to track performance, the Legislature enacted and the Governor signed into law Senate Bill 608, enacted as Chapter 318 of the Statutes of 1997, which required the California Department of Veterans Affairs to annually report the amount of monetary benefits paid to veterans by the federal government that were attributable to the assistance of county veterans service officers. Senate Bill 608 also required the Department of Finance to consider an increase in the annual budget for county veterans service officers of up to $5 million, if approved in the annual budget process. In 2009, the Legislature enacted and the Governor signed into law Senate Bill 419 enacted as Chapter 183 of the Statutes of 2009, which raised this amount to $11 million, if approved in the annual budget process.
(g)As a result of this annual reporting, by the end of 2013, it had been determined that from 1995 to 2013, inclusive, the state had cumulatively budgeted $41.4 million for its share of the cost of the county veterans service officers. As a result of this investment, county veteran service officers were able to assist local veterans in obtaining $4.1 billion, in new federal moneys. This is a return of about $98 for every $1 the state allocates to county veterans service officers. Furthermore, the $4.1 billion only reflects the actual monetary benefits qualified for in a given year. The monetary benefits qualified for in prior years are not tracked, yet the veterans and their dependents may continue to receive those benefits for the rest of their lives. Added to this stellar return on the states investment, but not counted in the annual reporting, are the Medi-Cal cost avoidance savings incurred as a result of county veterans service officers qualifying and shifting veterans away from Medi-Cal and into the appropriate federal veterans program.
(h)The county veterans service officers had accomplished all of this without ever reaching the allowable state budget allocation of $11 million, set in 2009. To date, the county veterans service officers have not received more than $5.6 million per year from the state.
(i)It is critical that the county veterans service officers receive a steady stream of funding because there continues to be a large number of underserved veterans and their dependents who are not aware of the federal benefits available to them as a result of their military service. Studies from other states have shown that increases in county veterans service officers have resulted in larger amounts of federal moneys to veterans. These new federal moneys and benefits are paid directly from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs to the qualifying veteran or their dependent and are used in the local economy.
SEC. 2.Section 972.1 of the Military and Veterans Code, as amended by Section 3 of Chapter 401 of the Statutes of 2012, is amended to read:972.1.(a)The sum of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) is hereby appropriated from the General Fund to the Department of Veterans Affairs for allocation, during the 198990 fiscal year, for purposes of funding the activities of county veterans service officers pursuant to this section. Funds for allocation in future years shall be as provided in the annual Budget Act.
(b)
972.1.(a)Funds shall be disbursed each fiscal year on a pro rata basis to counties that have established and maintain a county veterans service officer in accordance with the staffing level and workload of each county veterans service officer under a formula based upon performance that shall be developed by the Department of Veterans Affairs for these purposes.
(1)For the purposes of this section, workload unit means a specific claim activity that is used to allocate subvention funds to counties, which is approved by the department, and performed by county veterans service officers.
(2)For the purposes of this subdivision, the department, by June 30, 2013, shall develop a performance-based formula that will incentivize county veterans service officers to perform workload units that help veterans access federal compensation and pension benefits and other benefits, in order to maximize the amount of federal money received by California veterans.
(c)
(b)The department shall annually determine the amount of new or increased monetary benefits paid to eligible veterans by the federal government attributable to the assistance of county veterans service officers. The department shall, on or before October 1 of each year, prepare and transmit its determination for the preceding fiscal year to the Department of Finance and the Legislature. The Department of Finance shall review the departments determination in time to use the information in the annual Budget Act for the budget of the department for the next fiscal year.
(d)
(c)The department shall conduct a review of the high-performing and low-performing county veterans service officers and based on this review, shall produce a best-practices manual for county veterans service officers by June 30, 2013.
(e)(1)The Legislature finds and declares that 50 percent of the amount annually budgeted for county veterans service officers is approximately eleven million dollars ($11,000,000). The Legislature further finds and declares that it is an efficient and reasonable use of state funds to increase the annual budget for county veterans service officers in an amount not to exceed eleven million dollars ($11,000,000) if it is justified by the monetary benefits to the states veterans attributable to the effort of these officers.
(2)It is the intent of the Legislature, after reviewing the departments determination in subdivision (c), to consider an increase in the annual budget for county veterans service officers in an amount not to exceed five million dollars ($5,000,000), if the monetary benefits to the states veterans attributable to the assistance of county veterans service officers justify that increase in the budget.
(d)The Legislature finds and declares that it is an efficient and reasonable use of state funds to increase the annual budget for county veterans service officers up to a total of eleven million dollars ($11,000,000) if it is justified by the monetary benefits to the states veterans attributable to the effort of these officers.
(f)
(e)This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2016, and as of that date is repealed.
SEC. 3.Section 972.1 of the Military and Veterans Code, as amended by Section 2 of Chapter 401 of the Statutes of 2012, is amended to read:972.1.(a)The sum of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) is hereby appropriated from the General Fund to the Department of Veterans Affairs for allocation, during the 198990 fiscal year, for purposes of funding the activities of county veterans service officers pursuant to this section. Funds for allocation in future years shall be as provided in the annual Budget Act.
(b)
972.1.(a)Funds shall be disbursed each fiscal year on a pro rata basis to counties that have established and maintain a county veterans service officer in accordance with the staffing level and workload of each county veterans service officer under a formula based upon performance that shall be developed by the Department of Veterans Affairs for these purposes, and that shall allocate county funds in any fiscal year for county veterans service officers in an amount not less than the amount allocated in the 198889 fiscal year. five million six hundred thousand dollars ($5,600,000).
(c)
(b)The department shall annually determine the amount of new or increased monetary benefits paid to eligible veterans by the federal government attributable to the assistance of county veterans service officers. The department shall, on or before October 1 of each year, prepare and transmit its determination for the preceding fiscal year to the Department of Finance and the Legislature. The Department of Finance shall review the departments determination in time to use the information in the annual Budget Act for the budget of the department for the next fiscal year.
(d) (1)The Legislature finds and declares that 50 percent of the amount annually budgeted for county veterans service officers is approximately eleven million dollars ($11,000,000). The Legislature further finds and declares that it is an efficient and reasonable use of state funds to increase the annual budget for county veterans service officers in an amount not to exceed eleven million dollars ($11,000,000) if it is justified by the monetary benefits to the states veterans attributable to the effort of these officers.
(2)It is the intent of the Legislature, after reviewing the departments determination in subdivision (c), to consider an increase in the annual budget for county veterans service officers in an amount not to exceed five million dollars ($5,000,000), if the monetary benefits to the states veterans attributable to the assistance of county veteran service officers justify that increase in the budget.
(c)The Legislature finds and declares that it is an efficient and reasonable use of state funds to increase the annual budget for county veterans service officers up to a total of eleven million dollars ($11,000,000) if it is justified by the monetary benefits to the states veterans attributable to the effort of these officers.
(e)
(d)This section shall become operative January 1, 2016.
SEC. 4.Section 972.3 is added to the Military and Veterans Code, to read:972.3.(a)Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government Code, the sum of five million six hundred thousand dollars ($5,600,000) is hereby continuously appropriated from the General Fund each fiscal year commencing July 1, 2015, to the Department of Veterans Affairs to be available for allocation to counties to fund the activities of county veterans service officers pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 972.1.
(b)The Department of Veterans Affairs shall, no later than July 1, 2016, develop an allocation formula based upon performance standards that encourage innovation and reward outstanding service by county veterans service officers. Moneys appropriated for this purpose shall be allocated each fiscal year in accordance with that formula among those counties that have established and maintained a county veterans service officer pursuant to Section 970.
SEC. 5.This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
Approximately 50 percent of the current General Fund appropriation in support of county veteran service offices operations expires on June 30, 2015. In order to provide for continuity of services critical to the successful reintegration of Californias veterans, to increase Californias utilization of veteran benefits, and to ensure veterans claims for benefits are processed in a timely manner, it is necessary that this act take effect immediately.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2015 | Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 1794.). |
| Aug 29, 2016 | Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Block. |
| Aug 17, 2016 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Aug 16, 2016 | Ordered to second reading. |
| Aug 16, 2016 | From inactive file. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Nielsen. |
| Aug 31, 2015 | Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading. |
| Aug 27, 2015 | From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 27). |
| Jul 13, 2015 | In committee: Referred to suspense file. |
| Jun 29, 2015 | In committee: Hearing postponed by committee. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Jun 11, 2015 | Referred to Com. on V.A. |
| Jan 22, 2015 | Read first time. To print. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. |
| Jun 1, 2015 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| May 28, 2015 | Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading. |
| May 28, 2015 | From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 28). |
| Mar 25, 2015 | In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | Read second time and amended. |
| Mar 16, 2015 | From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (March 10). |
| Feb 2, 2015 | Referred to Com. on V.A. |
| Jan 23, 2015 | From printer. May be heard in committee February 22. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2015 | Do pass as amended | Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Jul 13, 2015 | Placed on suspense file | Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Jun 23, 2015 | Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Senate Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs |
Passed |
|
| Jun 2, 2015 | AB 171 IRWIN Third Reading Urgency | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| May 28, 2015 | Do pass as amended. | Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Mar 10, 2015 | Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Assembly Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| 34 Rural Counties | * Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Amador, County of | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| American Legion, Department Of California | * Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Amvets, Department Of California | * Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Board Of Supervisors For Napa County | * Support | Mar 25, 2015 |
| Butte, County Of | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| California Association Of County Veterans Service Officers | * Indeterminate | Mar 10, 2015 |
| California State Association Of Counties | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| California State Commanders Veterans Council | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| CDP Veteran's Caucus | * Indeterminate | Mar 10, 2015 |
| Colusa, County of | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Contra Costa County | * Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Contra Costa, County of | * Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| County Of Plumas | ** Support | Mar 10, 2015 |
| County of Sierra | ** Support | Mar 10, 2015 |
| Del Norte, County Of | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Disabled Veteran Business Alliance | * Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| El Dorado, County Of | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Fresno, County Of | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Glendale City Employees Association | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Kern County Board of Supervisors | * Indeterminate | Mar 10, 2015 |
| Kings, County of | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors | * Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Madera, County of | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Marin County | * Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Marin, County Of | * Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Mariposa, County Of | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Merced, County Of | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Military Officers Association Of America, California Council Of Chapters | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| National Guard Association Of California | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Placer, County Of | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Plumas, County of | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Rural County Representatives of California | * Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| San Bernardino Public Employees Association | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| San Joaquin County Health Care Services Agency | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| San Luis Obispo County Employees Association | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Santa Barbara, County Of | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Shasta, County Of | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Sierra, County of | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| SMUD Employees | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Tehama, County of | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| The American Legion Department California | * Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| The Veterans Of Foreign Wars, Department Of California | * Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Ventura County Board Of Education | * Support | Mar 25, 2015 |
| Ventura County Board of Supervisors | * Indeterminate | Mar 10, 2015 |
| Ventura, County Of | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Vietnam Veterans Of America, California State Council | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
| Yuba, County of | ** Support | Jun 23, 2015 |
AB 171
Page 7
|
Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 |
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 171
Amended: 8/31/15 in Senate
SENATE VETERANS AFFAIRS COMMITTEE: 5-0, 6/23/15
AYES: Nielsen, Hueso, Allen, Nguyen, Roth
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 5-0, 8/27/15
AYES: Lara, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza
NO VOTE RECORDED: Bates, Nielsen
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 78-0, 6/2/15 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Department of Veterans Affairs: veterans’ services
DIGEST: This bill modifies the formula by which the Department of Veterans Affairs (CalVet) allocates state funds to county veterans service officers (CVSOs), and adds reporting requirements to help determine how effectively and efficiently state funds are being spent.
Existing law:
Provides for CVSOs, who assist veterans in making claims for benefits provided for by federal or state law, and who perform other veteran-related services requested by the board of supervisors.
Provides that the compensation and expenses of the CVSO shall be a county charge, but CalVet, out of state moneys made available, shall pay each county a portion of those costs in an amount determined by CalVet.
Provides for an annual state appropriation for the CVSOs as determined in each year's Budget Act, currently funded at $5.6 million.
Requires CalVet to determine and report to the Department of Finance (DOF):
The number of claims filed to achieve benefits such as pension, disability compensation, and health care on behalf of veterans and their dependents.
The annualized monetary value of benefits received by veterans and their dependents as a result of the efforts of CVSOs, broken down by type of benefit.
A summary of other services provided by CVSOs and participation in outreach activities, such as homeless veteran “Stand Downs,” and job fairs.
Requires CalVet, on or before October 1 of each year, to prepare and transmit its determination for the preceding fiscal year to DOF and the Legislature.
Directs DOF to review CalVet's determination in time to use the information in the annual Budget Act with regard to CalVet’s budget for the next fiscal year.
Provides that state subvention funds shall be disbursed each fiscal year on a pro rata basis to counties that have established and maintain a CVSO in accordance with the staffing level and workload of each CVSO under a formula based upon performance, as specified, developed by CalVet.
Repeals existing language:
That will be superseded by the new allocation formula and reporting requirements.
That offers legislative findings, declarations and intent regarding CVSO funding levels.
This bill:
Requires CalVet, no later than July 1, 2016, to develop an allocation formula based upon performance standards that encourage innovation and reward outstanding service by CVSOs.
Requires that the moneys, upon appropriation by the Legislature, be allocated each fiscal year among only those counties that, in the discretion of the secretary, comply with the following requirements:
Establish and maintain a CVSO.
Collect and report all information required by CalVet in departmental regulations.
Comply with the training and accreditation standards for CVSOs and veterans service representatives (VSRs) as may be set by CalVet.
Require CVSOs and VSRs to become accredited with CalVet for the purposing of providing representation services before the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (USDVA) within 18 months of being hired, or on or before June 1, 2017, whichever is later.
Requires CalVet to report, annually to the Legislature, the efficacy, return on investment, work volume, and regional impact of the subvention funds on each county that receives those funds.
Also requires CalVet to report, annually to the Legislature by October 1:
The amount of new or increased monetary benefits paid to eligible veterans by the federal government attributable to CVSO assistance and the basis for that determination.
The amount paid to each county, including the amounts paid to each county for each category of workload unit, as defined, included in the allocation formula.
An evaluation as to each county’s use of subvention funds, including recommendations for improvement of each county’s use of subvention funds.
Background
County veterans service officers. CVSOs are trained, accredited professionals, who work at the county level of government and partner with CalVet. CVSOs may legally represent veterans in the federal benefits claims process, and also help connect veterans with state- and locally-provided benefits. VSRs are claims workers who work under the supervision of CVSOs.
Collectively, the CVSOs, through claims initiation and development, and CalVet, through claims development and representation, provide assistance to veterans and their dependents in preparing and submitting claims and in representing claimants before the federal, state and local agencies providing veterans benefits. CVSOs use the CalVet-sponsored VetPro software program to enhance their claims reporting and tracking.
California’s utilization of veteran benefits. California’s utilization of the primary monetary veteran benefits, referred to as compensation and pension, has historically lagged behind that of the nation as a whole. Recently, however, California has improved its utilization rates.
In 2007, CalVet recommended several strategies to address benefit underutilization, including providing resources in support of additional full time professional service representative staff with a focus on areas with large veteran populations and lower than average benefit participation rates. The primary strategies are:
That subvention funding for CVSOs should be increased to support an expansion of CVSO office staffing. The additional funding shall be directed to expanding the staff dedicated to full time outreach and claims work.
That resources are needed to fund additional professional service representative staff at CalVet district offices in support of claims representation (appeals), local training, and local outreach. Outreach should specifically increase in areas where the state can provide economy of scale.
According to CalVet’s latest annual report (October 20, 2014), CVSOs brought in approximately $546 million in new, recurring veteran benefits into the state’s economy.
CVSO funding. While CVSOs are independent local agencies, funding is derived from a combination of local and state resources. The state provides limited local assistance funding from various sources, including the General Fund (subvention), Veterans Service Office Fund, and reimbursements (Medi-Cal cost avoidance). The subvention funding is appropriated to CalVet, which allocates the funds to the CVSOs.
Since 2004, the state’s contribution to CVSO funding has languished at $2.6 million until recent years. The Legislature enacted consecutive “one-time” augmentations of $3 million, which were included, respectively, in the 2013-14 and 2014-15. The 2015-16 state budget process established the level of $5.6 as the new budgetary baseline.
The single-year augmentations have been dedicated to one of three main themes from the CalVet/CVSO best practices manual:
Contacting veterans.
Connecting veterans to their benefits and services.
Continuous communication with veterans.
The funding increase boosted the abilities of CVSOs and CalVet to connect veterans in their communities with the expansion of outreach activities, thereby linking more veterans with their community-based system of care and local service providers. The funds have allowed for the deployment of 32.5 additional professional VSRs and 30 support staff to connect veterans with their compensation and pension benefits available through the USDVA, resulting in an increase of federal dollars drawn down to the state this year and continuing into future years.
Comments
The previous version of this bill contained a provision, which would have continuously appropriated $5.6 million annually from the General Fund to CalVet for allocation to counties to fund CVSO activities. This was removed in Senate Appropriations Committee.
In July 2015, the State Auditor released Report 2015-505, which concluded, among other things, that CalVet’s auditing of CVSO workload activity reports is inadequate and hinders the department’s ability to demonstrate that the funding it distributes to the CVSOs is consistent with their actual workloads:
The auditing process does not generally identify errors that can be found only by reviewing the records that are the basis of the reports.
The procedures for conducting audits are not documented, thereby reducing assurance that audits are conducted correctly and completely.
According to CalVet, the language in AB 171 is part of the Department’s effort to respond to the audit’s findings and recommendations.
Related/Prior Legislation
AB 2703 (Quirk-Silva, 2014) (1) would have required CalVet, no later than January 1, 2015, to develop an allocation formula based upon performance standards that incentivize CVSO performance; and (2) would have declared the Legislature’s intent to fund specified CVSO activities and to provide an additional $400,000 for disbursement to the counties to encourage innovation and reward outstanding service by CVSOs. (Held, suspense, Senate Committee on Appropriations)
SB 419 (Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs, Chapter 48, Statutes of 2009) (1) revises findings and declarations in existing law by declaring that 50 percent of the amount annually budgeted for CVSOs is (should be) approximately $11 million (rather than the existing $5 million), and (2) sunsets after January 1, 2016.
SB 418 (Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs, Chapter 48, Statutes of 2009) revises existing legislative findings and declarations with regard to the use of General Fund monies for services provided by veterans service organizations by clarifying that the General Fund monies shall not be allocated until the annual budget for CVSOs reaches $5 million.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: Yes Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No
According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:
Unknown costs, potentially in the tens of thousands for CalVet to annually report on the impact of funds provided in the annual Budget Act to support activities of CVSOs (General Fund).
Minor costs to develop an allocation formula to govern the distribution of the appropriated funds to CVSOs (General Fund).
None received
OPPOSITION: (Verified 8/28/15)
None received
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 78-0, 6/2/15
AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins
NO VOTE RECORDED: Chávez, Grove
Prepared by: Wade Cooper Teasdale / V.A. / (916) 651-1503
8/30/15 19:49:06
**** END ****
AB 171 (Irwin) Page 0 of 1
SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair
2015 - 2016 Regular Session
AB 171 (Irwin) - Department of Veterans Affairs: veterans’ services.
|
|
Version: May 28, 2015 |
Policy Vote: V.A. 5 - 0 |
Urgency: Yes |
Mandate: No |
Hearing Date: August 27, 2015 |
Consultant: Jillian Kissee |
*********** ANALYSIS ADDENDUM – SUSPENSE FILE ***********
The following information is revised to reflect amendments
adopted by the committee on August 27, 2015
Bill Summary:
This bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs (Department) to develop an allocation formula for funding provided to counties to support the activities of county veterans service officers. This bill also requires the Department to annually report to the Legislature on the impact of these funds.
Fiscal Impact:
Unknown costs, potentially in the tens of thousands for the Department to annually report on the impact of funds provided in the annual Budget Act to support activities of county veterans service officers (General Fund).
Minor costs to develop an allocation formula to govern the distribution of the appropriated funds to county veterans service officers (General Fund).
Author Amendments:
Amend to remove appropriation and add a reporting requirement regarding the impact of funds, as specified, provided in the budget for county veterans service officers.
-- END --
AB 171 (Irwin) Page 2 of 2
SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair
2015 - 2016 Regular Session
AB 171 (Irwin) - Department of Veterans Affairs: veterans’ services
|
|
Version: May 28, 2015 |
Policy Vote: V.A. 5 - 0 |
Urgency: Yes |
Mandate: No |
Hearing Date: July 13, 2015 |
Consultant: Brendan McCarthy |
This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.
Bill Summary:
AB 171 would appropriate $5.6 million from the General Fund every year to the Department of Veterans Affairs to support county veterans service officers.
Fiscal Impact:
Annual costs of $5.6 million per year to provide support to county veterans service officers by the Department of Veteran’s Affairs (General Fund).
Minor costs to develop an allocation formula to govern the distribution of the appropriated funds to county veterans service officers (General Fund). The Department has already developed most of the criteria required in the bill.
Background:
County veterans service officers are county officials who are authorized to represent veterans in the process for claiming federal veterans’ benefits. 56 of California’s 58 counties have a county veterans service officer. Due to historically low levels of receipt of benefits by California’s veterans, the Department of Veteran’s Affairs has provided funding to county veterans service officers to provide assistance to veterans in claiming the benefits they are entitled to.
Current law authorizes funding in the annual budget act to the Department of Veteran’s Affairs for allocation to county veterans service officers. Current law requires the Department to collect information on the additional federal veterans’ benefits that California veterans receive due to assistance by county veterans service officers.
Proposed Law:
AB 171 would appropriate $5.6 million from the General Fund every year to the Department of Veterans Affairs for allocation to counties to support county veterans service officers.
The bill would require the Department of Veteran’s Affairs to develop an allocation formula based upon performance standards for allocating the appropriated money to county veterans service officers.
This bill is an urgency measure.
Related Legislation:
AB 2703 (Quirk-Silva, 2014) would have required the Department of Veteran’s Affairs to develop an allocation formula to distribute funds to county veterans service officers. That bill was held on this committee’s Suspense File.
Staff Comments: The current year (2015-16) budget includes $7.5 million in funding for county veterans service officers, including $5.6 million from the General Fund.
By assisting veterans with the requirements to access their benefits, county veterans service officers help veterans access the benefits they are entitled to, bring additional federal funds into the state economy, and potentially reduce the dependence of veterans on state and local programs. According to the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, during the 2013-14 fiscal year, county veterans service officers assisted California veterans in accessing $545 million in federal benefits.
-- END --
AB 171 (Irwin) Page 6 of 6
SENATE COMMITTEE ON VETERANS AFFAIRS
Senator Jim Nielsen, Chair
2015 - 2016 Regular
Bill No: AB 171 Hearing Date: 6/23/15
Author: |
Irwin |
||
Version: |
5/28/15 Amended |
||
Urgency: |
Yes |
Fiscal: |
Yes |
Consultant: |
Wade Cooper Teasdale |
||
Subject: Department of Veterans Affairs: veterans’ services.
DESCRIPTION
Summary:
Appropriates $5.6 million annually to the California Department of Veterans Affairs (CalVet) for allocation to counties to fund county veterans service officers (CVSOs).
Existing law:
Provides for annual appropriation to the CVSOs as determined in each year's Budget Act.
Requires CalVet to determine and report to the Department of Finance (DOF) the following: The amount of new or increased monetary benefits paid to eligible veterans by the federal government that is attributable to the assistance by CVSOs.
Mandates that CalVet must, on or before October 1 of each year, prepare and transmit its determination for the preceding fiscal year to the Department of Finance and the Legislature.
Directs DOF to review CalVet's determination in time to use the information in the annual Budget Act with regard to CalVet’s budget for the next fiscal year (FY).
This bill:
Appropriates $5.6 million annually from the General Fund (GF) to CalVet for allocation to counties to fund the activities of CVSOs.
Clarifies that this money shall be available for encumbrance and expenditure for only one year from the date upon which it first becomes available for encumbrance.
Directs CalVet to develop, no later than July 1, 2016, an allocation formula based upon performance standards that encourage innovation and reward outstanding service by CVSOs. Moneys appropriated for this purpose shall be allocated each FY in accordance with that formula among those counties that have established and maintained a CVSO office.
Contains an urgency clause. The basis for the urgency is stated as: "Approximately 50 percent of the current GF appropriation in support of county veteran service offices operations expires on June 30, 2015. In order to provide for continuity of services critical to the successful reintegration of California’s veterans, to increase California’s utilization of veteran benefits, and to ensure veteran’s claims for benefits are processed in a timely manner, it is necessary that this act take effect immediately."
Deletes existing references in statute that are obsolete or conflict with this bill’s provisions.
BACKGROUND
County Veterans Service Officers
CVSOs are trained, accredited professionals, who may legally represent veterans in the federal benefits claims process, and also help connect veterans with state- and locally-provided benefits. Fifty-six of California’s 58 counties have CVSOs, whose professional interests are represented by the California Association of County Veterans Service Officers (CACVSO).
The California CVSO model requires close partnership between state and county governments through the auspices of CalVet and the various CVSO offices. Collectively, the CVSO, through claims initiation and development, and CalVet, through claims development and representation, provide assistance to veterans and their dependents in preparing and submitting claims and in representing claimants before the federal, state and local agencies providing veterans benefits. CVSOs use the CalVet-sponsored VetPro software program to enhance their claims reporting and tracking.
California’s Utilization of Veteran Benefits
California’s utilization of the primary monetary veteran benefits, referred to as compensation and pension (C&P), has historically lagged behind that of the nation as a whole. Recently, however, California has improved its utilization rates.
In 2007, CalVet recommended several strategies to address benefit underutilization, including providing resources in support of additional full time professional service representative staff with a focus on areas with large veteran populations and lower than average benefit participation rates. The primary strategies are:
That subvention funding for CVSOs should be increased to support an expansion of county veterans service office staffing. The additional funding shall be directed to expanding the staff dedicated to full time outreach and claims work.
That resources are needed to fund additional professional service representative staff at CalVet district offices in support of claims representation (appeals), local training, and local outreach. Outreach should specifically increase in areas where the state can provide economy of scale.
According to CalVet’s latest annual report (October 20, 2014), CVSOs brought in approximately $546 million in new, recurring veteran benefits into the state’s economy.
CVSO Funding
While CVSOs are independent local agencies, funding is derived from a combination of local and state resources. The state provides limited local assistance funding from various sources, including the GF (subvention), Veterans Service Office Fund (VSOF), and reimbursements (Medi-Cal cost avoidance). The subvention funding is appropriated to CalVet, which allocates the funds to the CVSOs.
Although Military and Veterans Code (MVC) Section 972.1 sets a target of $11 million dollars for subvention funding, actual funding has never reached that level. Since 2004, the state’s contribution to CVSO funding has languished at $2.6 million with two temporary exceptions. The exceptions occurred recently, when the Legislature enacted two consecutive single-year augmentations of $3 million, which were included, respectively, in the 2013-14 and 2014-15 state budget bills.
The two additional single-year augmentations were dedicated to one of three main themes from the CalVet/CVSO best practices manual:
Contacting veterans.
Connecting veterans to their benefits and services.
Continuous communication with veterans.
The funding increase boosted the abilities of CVSOs and CalVet to connect veterans in their communities with the expansion of outreach activities, thereby linking more veterans with their community-based system of care and local service providers. The funds have allowed for the deployment of 32.5 additional professional veterans service representatives and 30 support staff to connect veterans with their compensation and pension benefits available through the USDVA, resulting in an increase of federal dollars drawn down to the state this year and continuing into future years.
COMMENT
Author Statement
"California is home to an estimated two million veterans, and their widows or widowers, who are often unaware that they may be eligible for benefits or federal pensions and California’s CVSOs are the initial local point of contact for these potential claimants.
“According to CalVet reporting, it has been determined that from 1995 to 2013, the state had cumulatively budgeted $41.4 million to CVSO funding, an investment that helped local veterans obtain $4.1 billion in new federal moneys. This is a return of about $98 for every $1 the state allocates to CVSOs. Furthermore, the $4.1 billion in new funding reflects benefits that veterans and their dependents may continue to receive for the rest of their lives.”
Committee Comments
Without permanent legislative recalibration or another temporary, annual Budget augmentation, State GF funding for CVSOs will continue at $5.6 million only through June 2015, then will revert back to $2.6 million. During the period 2007 to 2013, the Legislature considered numerous bills, which would have increased state subvention funding to CVSOs, but none were enacted. If enacted, AB 171 would break through that wall.
Related Legislation
AB 2703 (Quirk-Silva, 2014): (1) requires CalVet, no later than January 1, 2015, to develop an allocation formula based upon performance standards that incentivize CVSO performance; and (2) declares the Legislature’s intent to fund specified CVSO activities and to provide an additional $400,000 for disbursement to the counties to encourage innovation and reward outstanding service by CVSOs. (Held, suspense, Senate Committee on Appropriations)
SB 419 (Senate Veterans Affairs Comm, Chapter 48, Statutes of 2009) (1) revises findings and declarations in existing law by declaring that 50 percent of the amount annually budgeted for CVSOs is (should be) approximately $11 million (rather than the existing $5 million); (2) sunsets after January 1, 2016; and (3) only becomes operative if SB 418 (Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs, 2009) is chaptered. This majority-vote bill contained no appropriation, and was not keyed fiscal.
SB 418 (Senate Veterans Affairs Comm, Chapter 48, Statutes of 2009) revises legislative findings and declarations in existing law with regard to the use of General Fund monies for services provided by veterans service organizations by clarifying that the General Fund monies shall not be allocated until the annual budget for CVSOs reaches $5 million. Contained no appropriation. Nonfiscal.
SB 1778 (Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs, 2008) changes findings and declarations by increasing the amount budgeted for CVSOs from $5 million to $11 million. This bill was not an appropriation. (Vetoed)
SB 1222 (Cedillo, 2008) (1) increases funding for veterans outreach by appropriating three dollars for every California veteran; and (2) requires that each three-dollar appropriation be disbursed as follows: CVSOs - $2.35; veteran service organizations - $0.50; and the Veteran Services Division/CalVet - $0.15. (Held, suspense, Senate Committee on Appropriations)
AB 1814 (DeVore, 2008) “The Veterans Benefit Recovery Augmentation Plan” facilitates CalVet contracting with veteran services organizations to augment the outreach services provided CalVet’s Veterans Service Division. (Held, suspense, Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs)
AB 2577 (Salas, 2008) supports reinstating funding cut by the Governor for the CVSOs as well as the State Veteran Service Officers. (Held Assembly Committee on Rules)
AB 389 (Salas, 2007) appropriates $5,000,000 from the General Fund to CalVet for disbursement to the counties. (Held, suspense, Assembly Committee on Appropriations)
AB 2268 (Samuelian, Chapter 804, Statutes of 2004) authorizes CalVet to contract out services to VSOs and, with the approval from the Department of Finance, to reimburse those organizations for services rendered on a formula/performance basis starting in fiscal year 2006-07.
SB 608 (Johannessen, Chapter 318, Statutes of 1997) approves a CVSO funding level of up to $5,000,000 of which only approximately $2,500,000 has traditionally been funded.
POSITIONS
Sponsor: California Association of County Veteran Service Officers (CACVSO)
Support:
Amador, County of
American Legion, Department of California
AMVETS, Department of California
California State Association of Counties (CSAC)
California State Commanders Veterans Council
Butte, County of
Colusa, County of
Contra Costa, County of
Del Norte, County of
El Dorado, County of
Fresno, County of
Glendale City Employees Association
Kings, County of
Placer, County of
Los Angeles, County of
Madera, County of
Mariposa, County of
Merced, County of
Plumas, County of
Marin, County of
Military Officers Association of America, California Council of Chapters
Napa, County of
National Guard Association of California
Rural County Representatives of California (RCRC)
San Bernardino Public Employees Association
San Joaquin County Health Care Services Agency
San Luis Obispo County Employees Association
Santa Barbara, County of
Shasta, County of
Sierra, County of
SMUD Employees
Tehama, County of
Tulare, County of
Ventura, County of
Veterans of Foreign Wars, Department of California
Vietnam Veterans of America, California State Council
Yuba, County of
Oppose: None received
-- END --
AB 171
Page 3
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
AB 171
(Irwin)
As Amended May 28, 2015
2/3 vote. Urgency
Committee |
Votes |
Ayes |
Noes |
Veterans Affairs |
9-0 |
Irwin, Mathis, Alejo, Brough, Brown, Chávez, Daly, Frazier, Salas |
|
Appropriations |
17-0 |
Gomez, Bigelow, Bonta, Calderon, Chang, Daly, Eggman, Gallagher, Eduardo Garcia, Gordon, Holden, Jones, Quirk, Rendon, Wagner, Weber, Wood |
|
SUMMARY: Appropriates money to the California Department of Veterans Affairs (CDVA) for allocation to the County Veterans Service Officers (CVSOs) as specified. There are currently two Military and Veterans Code Section 972.1; one is applicable until the end of 2015, another applies January 1, 2016. As to the current section, this bill deletes language pertaining to a $500,000 appropriation and other obsolete references that would conflict with the intent to raise the annual appropriation to $5.6 million dollars. Specifically, this bill:
As to the Military and Veterans Code Section 972.1 taking effect January 1, 2016, deletes conflicting or obsolete references and raises the annual appropriation minimum to $5.6 million.
Adds Military and Veterans Code Section 972.3. This new section:
Appropriates $5.6 million annually from the General Fund (GF) to CDVA for allocation to counties to fund the activities of county veterans service officers pursuant to Military and Veterans Code Section 972.1(a).
Clarifies that this money shall only be available for encumbrance and expenditure for one year from the date upon which it first becomes available for encumbrance.
Directs the CDVA to, no later than July 1, 2016, develop an allocation formula based upon performance standards that encourage innovation and reward outstanding service by county veterans service officers. Moneys appropriated for this purpose shall be allocated each fiscal year (FY) in accordance with that formula among those counties that have established and maintained a county veterans service officer pursuant to Military and Veterans Code Section 970.
Contains an urgency clause. The basis for the urgency is stated as: "Approximately 50 percent of the current GF appropriation in support of county veteran service offices operations expires on June 30, 2015. In order to provide for continuity of services critical to the successful reintegration of California’s veterans, to increase California’s utilization of veteran benefits, and to ensure veteran’s claims for benefits are processed in a timely manner, it is necessary that this act take effect immediately."
FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee:
The Governor's Budget proposes a $2.6 million GF appropriation to the CDVA for allocation to the CVSOs in 2015-16. Assuming this amount was approved and was the same every year thereafter, the annual impact of this bill will be an additional $3 million GF cost.
Minor one-time costs to the CDVA to develop an allocation formula.
Unknown savings to various state programs if the CVSOs are able to transfer participants from state programs to appropriate federal veterans programs.
The additional work by CVSOs may result in additional federal payments to California veterans.
COMMENTS: CVSOs are local agencies established in 1946 to assist veterans and their families in obtaining benefits and services accrued through military service. They act as the department's network for claim initiation and development and draw down significant federal dollars annually.
The cost of maintaining a CVSO is primarily a county general fund expense; however, counties with an established CVSO receive some State reimbursement funds as authorized by the California Military and Veterans Code. Depending on the revenue source, these funds are distributed either based on specific performance measurements or as a percentage of net county cost. It is important to emphasize that while state general funds and federal pass-through funds distributed by the CDVA assists counties in maintaining their CVSOs, the primary cost of the CVSO program statewide is a county expense, as opposed to a State expense. Funds received by CVSOs are subject to both internal county audits and regular audits by the CDVA in accordance with the California Code of Regulations.
According to the California Association of County Veterans Service Officers 2015 Annual Report and Directory, in FY 2013-14, when CVSO state local assistance funding was temporarily increased from $2.6 million to $5.6 million, the CVSO’s were able to increase federal benefits to California veterans by over $100 million.
The total state audited amount of federal compensation and pension payments to veterans and their families rose from $445 million in FY 2012-13 to $545 million in FY 2013-14. The majority of those payments are paid monthly to the veteran over his or her lifetime.
California’s Utilization of Veteran Benefits
California’s utilization of the primary monetary veteran benefits, referred to as compensation and pension (C&P), has historically lagged behind the nation as a whole. Recently, however, California has improved its utilization rates though there is still work to be done.
In 2007 CDVA recommended several strategies to correct the underutilization including:
…providing resources in support of additional full time professional service representative staff with a focus on areas with large veteran population and lower than average benefit participation rates.
Subvention funding for county veteran service offices should be increased to support an expansion of county veterans service office staffing. The additional funding shall be directed to expanding the staff dedicated to full time outreach and claims work.
Resources are needed to fund additional professional service representative staff at CalVet district offices in support of claims representation (appeals), local training, and local outreach. Outreach should specifically increase in areas where the State can provide economy of scale.
Currently subvention funding in support of CVSO operations is temporarily at $5.6 million but is scheduled to revert to the historic level of $2.6 million unless action is taken to set a new minimum funding level. Many counties used this temporary increase to add additional staff but also report that those positions are temporary and most will be eliminated if the funding is not made permanent.
Analysis Prepared by: John Spangler / V.A. / (916) 319-3550 FN: 0000700
AB 171
Page 1
Date of Hearing: March 25, 2015
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Jimmy Gomez, Chair
AB 171
(Irwin) – As Amended March 17, 2015
Policy Committee: |
Veterans Affairs |
Vote: |
9 - 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Urgency: Yes State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY:
This bill, beginning July 1, 2015, continuously appropriates $5.6 million from the General Fund (GF) annually to the California Department of Veterans Affairs (CDVA) for allocation to County Veterans Service Officers (CVSOs). The CDVA is required to develop an allocation formula by July 1, 2016
FISCAL EFFECT:
The Governor's Budget proposes a $2.6 million GF appropriation to the CDVA for allocation to the CVSOs in 2015-16. Assuming this amount was approved and was the same every year thereafter, the annual impact of this bill will be an additional $3 million GF cost.
Minor one-time costs to the DCVA to develop an allocation formula.
Unknown savings to various state programs if the CVSOs are able to transfer participants from state programs to appropriate federal veterans programs.
The additional work by CVSOs may result in additional federal payments to California veterans.
COMMENTS:
Purpose: According to the author, recent military conflicts are creating a new generation of veterans eligible for federal benefits. CVSOs are local agencies established in 1946 to assist veterans and their families in obtaining benefits and services accrued through military service. AB 171 is intended to provide a minimum level of predictable funding for CVSOs.
Background: Funding for CVSOs is provided in each year's Budget Act. The current Budget Act includes $5.6 million (GF), but the 2014-15 Governor's Budget proposes $2.6 million (GF).
Comments: This committee generally does not support continuous appropriations, which reduce legislative discretion.
Analysis Prepared by: Pedro Reyes / APPR. / (916) 319-2081
AB 171
Page 3
Date of Hearing: March 10, 2015
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON VETERANS AFFAIRS
Irwin, Chair
AB 171
(Irwin) – As Introduced January 22, 2015
SUBJECT:
Department of Veterans Affairs: veterans’ services.
Appropriates money to the California Department of Veterans Affairs (CDVA) for allocation to the County Veterans Service Officers (CVSOs) as specified. There are currently two Military and Veterans Code sections 972.1, one is applicable until the end of 2015, another applies January 1, 2016. As to the current section, this bill deletes language pertaining to a $500,000 appropriation and other obsolete references that would conflict with the intent to raise the appropriation to $5.6 million dollars.
Specifically, this bill:
As to the section 972.1 taking effect January 1, 2016, deletes conflicting or obsolete references and raises the annual appropriation minimum to $5.6 million.
Adds section 972.3. This new section:
Continuously appropriates five million six hundred thousand dollars ($5,600,000) annually from the General Fund to CDVA for allocation to counties to fund the activities of county veterans service officers pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 972.1.
Directs the Department of Veterans Affairs to, no later than July 1, 2016, develop an allocation formula based upon performance standards that encourage innovation and reward outstanding service by county veterans service officers. Moneys appropriated for this purpose shall be allocated each fiscal year in accordance with that formula among those counties that have established and maintained a county veterans service officer pursuant to Section 970.
Contains an urgency clause. The basis for the urgency is stated as : "Approximately 50 percent of the current General Fund appropriation in support of county veteran service offices operations expires on June 30, 2015. In order to provide for continuity of services critical to the successful reintegration of California’s veterans, to increase California’s utilization of veteran benefits, and to ensure veteran’s claims for benefits are processed in a timely manner, it is necessary that this act take effect immediately."
EXISTING
LAW:
Provides for annual appropriation to the CVSOs as determined in each year's Budget Act.
Requires annual reporting by CDVA to the Department of Finance The department must annually determine the amount of new or increased monetary benefits paid to eligible veterans by the federal government attributable to the assistance of county veterans service officers.
Mandates that CDVA must, on or before October 1 of each year, prepare and transmit its determination for the preceding fiscal year to the Department of Finance and the Legislature.
Directs the Department of Finance to review CDVA's determination in time to use the information in the annual Budget Act for the budget of CDVA for the next fiscal year.
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown at this time.
COMMENTS:
CVSOs are local agencies established in 1946 to assist veterans and their families in obtaining benefits and services accrued through military service. They act as the department's network for claim initiation and development and draw down significant federal dollars annually.
The cost of maintaining a CVSO is primarily a county general fund expense; however, counties with an established CVSO receive some State reimbursement funds as authorized by the California Military and Veterans Code. Depending on the revenue source, these funds are distributed either based on specific performance measurements or as a percentage of net county cost. It is important to emphasize that while state general funds and federal pass-through funds distributed by the California Department of Veterans Affairs (CalVet) assists counties in maintaining their CVSOs, the primary cost of the CVSO program statewide is a county expense, as opposed to a State expense. Funds received by CVSOs are subject to both internal county audits and regular audits by the CalVet in accordance with the California Code of Regulations.
According to the California Association of County Veterans Service Officers 2015 Annual Report and Directory, in FY 2013-14, when CVSO state local assistance funding was temporarily increased from $2.6 million to $5.6 million, the CVSO’s were able to increase federal benefits to California veterans by over $100 million.
The total state audited amount of federal compensation and pension payments to veterans and their families rose from $445 million in FY 2012-13 to $545 million in FY 2013-14. The majority of those payments are paid monthly to the veteran over his or her lifetime.
CALIFORNIA’S UTILIZATION OF VETERAN BENEFITS
California’s utilization of the primary monetary veteran benefits, referred to as compensation and pension (C&P), has historically lagged behind the nation as a whole. Recently, however, California has improved its utilization rates though there is still work to be done.
In 2007 CalVet recommended several strategies to correct the underutilization including:
“… providing resources in support of additional full time professional service representative staff with a focus on areas with large veteran population and lower than average benefit participation rates.
a. Subvention funding for county veteran service offices should be increased to support an expansion of county veterans service office staffing. The additional funding shall be directed to expanding the staff dedicated to full time outreach and claims work.
b. Resources are needed to fund additional professional service representative staff at CalVet district offices in support of claims representation (appeals), local training, and local outreach. Outreach should specifically increase in areas where the State can provide economy of scale.”
Currently subvention funding in support of CVSO operations is temporarily at $5.6 million but is scheduled to revert to the historic level of $2.6 million unless action is taken to set a new minimum funding level. Many counties used this temporary increase to add additional staff but also report that those positions are temporary and most will be eliminated if the funding is not made permanent.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
American Legion, Department of California
AMVETS, Department of California
California State Commanders Veterans Council
County of Butte
County of El Dorado
County of Fresno
County of Plumas
County of Santa Barbara
County of Shasta
County of Sierra
County of Tehama
County of Ventura
County of Yuba
Military Officers Association of America, California Council of Chapters
Veterans of Foreign Wars, Department of California
Vietnam Veterans of America, California State Council
Opposition
None on File
Analysis Prepared by:
John Spangler/V.A./(916) 319-3550
Discussed in Hearing
Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations
Senate Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs
Assembly Floor
Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations
Assembly Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):