AB 806: Community development: economic opportunity.
- Session Year: 2015-2016
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2016-09-23
Under existing law, before certain city, county, or city and county property is sold or leased for economic development purposes, approval of the sale or lease by the legislative body by resolution, after a public hearing, is required. Existing law requires that resolution to contain a finding that the sale or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity, as defined.
This bill would recast these provisions to instead authorize a city, county, or city and county, with the approval of its legislative body by resolution after a public hearing, to acquire, sell, or lease property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity, as defined. The bill would require the resolution to contain a finding that the acquisition, sale, or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity and would require the creation of an economic opportunity to be subject to specified public notice and hearing provisions.
Existing law prohibits the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes.
This bill would prohibit a city, county, or city and county from selling, leasing, or otherwise transferring, at a price that is less than the fair market value, for economic development purposes, any real property that was acquired through eminent domain, except as specified.
Existing law authorizes a city, county, or city and county to establish a program under which it loans funds to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures.
This bill would revise that authorization by requiring the loan to be in the form of a written loan agreement that includes a payment schedule, the terms for interest calculation, the rights and remedies of the parties in case of default, and any other material terms of the loan. The bill would require, prior to entering into that loan agreement, the city, county, or city and county to find, after a public hearing, that the assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the development and that the assistance cannot be obtained on economically feasible terms in the private market.
Under existing law, before certain city, county, or city and county property is sold or leased for economic development purposes, approval of the sale or lease by the legislative body by resolution, after a public hearing, is required. Existing law requires that resolution to contain a finding that the sale or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity, as defined.
This bill would recast these provisions to instead authorize a city, county, or city and county, with the approval of its legislative body by resolution after a public hearing, to acquire, sell, or lease property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity, as defined. The bill would require the resolution to contain a finding that the acquisition, sale, or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity and would require the creation of an economic opportunity to be subject to specified public notice and hearing provisions.
Existing law prohibits the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes.
This bill would prohibit a city, county, or city and county from selling, leasing, or otherwise transferring, at a price that is less than the fair market value, for economic development purposes, any real property that was acquired through eminent domain, except as specified.
Existing law authorizes a city, county, or city and county to establish a program under which it loans funds to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures.
This bill would revise that authorization by requiring the loan to be in the form of a written loan agreement that includes a payment schedule, the terms for interest calculation, the rights and remedies of the parties in case of default, and any other material terms of the loan. The bill would require, prior to entering into that loan agreement, the city, county, or city and county to find, after a public hearing, that the assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the development and that the assistance cannot be obtained on economically feasible terms in the private market.
Under existing law, before certain city, county, or city and county property is sold or leased for economic development purposes, approval of the sale or lease by the legislative body by resolution, after a public hearing, is required. Existing law requires that resolution to contain a finding that the sale or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity, as defined.
This bill would recast these provisions to instead authorize a city, county, or city and county, with the approval of its legislative body by resolution after a public hearing, to acquire, sell, or lease property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity, as defined. The bill would require the resolution to contain a finding that the acquisition, sale, or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity and would require the creation of an economic opportunity to be subject to specified public notice and hearing provisions.
Existing law prohibits the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes.
This bill would prohibit a city, county, or city and county from selling, leasing, or otherwise transferring, at a price that is less than the fair market value, for economic development purposes, any real property that was acquired through eminent domain, except as specified.
Existing law authorizes a city, county, or city and county to establish a program under which it loans funds to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures.
This bill would revise that authorization by requiring the loan to be in the form of a written loan agreement that includes a payment schedule, the terms for interest calculation, the rights and remedies of the parties in case of default, and any other material terms of the loan. The bill would require, prior to entering into that loan agreement, the city, county, or city and county to find, after a public hearing, that the assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the development and that the assistance cannot be obtained on economically feasible terms in the private market.
Under existing law, before certain city, county, or city and county property is sold or leased for economic development purposes, approval of the sale or lease by the legislative body by resolution, after a public hearing, is required. Existing law requires that resolution to contain a finding that the sale or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity, as defined.
This bill would recast these provisions to instead authorize a city, county, or city and county, with the approval of its legislative body by resolution after a public hearing, to acquire, sell, or lease property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity, as defined. The bill would require the resolution to contain a finding that the acquisition, sale, or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity and would require the creation of an economic opportunity to be subject to specified public notice and hearing provisions.
Existing law prohibits the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes.
This bill would prohibit a city, county, or city and county from selling, leasing, or otherwise transferring, at a price that is less than the fair market value, for economic development purposes, any real property that was acquired through eminent domain, except as specified.
Existing law authorizes a city, county, or city and county to establish a program under which it loans funds to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures.
This bill would revise that authorization by requiring the loan to be in the form of a written loan agreement that includes a payment schedule, the terms for interest calculation, the rights and remedies of the parties in case of default, and any other material terms of the loan. The bill would require, prior to entering into that loan agreement, the city, county, or city and county to find, after a public hearing, that the assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the development and that the assistance cannot be obtained on economically feasible terms in the private market.
Under existing law, before certain city, county, or city and county property is sold or leased for economic development purposes, approval of the sale or lease by the legislative body by resolution, after a public hearing, is required. Existing law requires that resolution to contain a finding that the sale or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity, as defined.
This bill would recast these provisions to instead authorize a city, county, or city and county, with the approval of its legislative body by resolution after a public hearing, to acquire, sell, or lease property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity, as defined. The bill would require the resolution to contain a finding that the acquisition, sale, or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity and would require the creation of an economic opportunity to be subject to specified public notice and hearing provisions.
Existing law prohibits the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes.
This bill would prohibit a city, county, or city and county from selling, leasing, or otherwise transferring, at a price that is less than the fair market value, for economic development purposes, any real property that was acquired through eminent domain, except as specified.
Existing law authorizes a city, county, or city and county to establish a program under which it loans funds to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures.
This bill would revise that authorization by requiring the loan to be in the form of a written loan agreement that includes a payment schedule, the terms for interest calculation, the rights and remedies of the parties in case of default, and any other material terms of the loan. The bill would require, prior to entering into that loan agreement, the city, county, or city and county to find, after a public hearing, that the assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the development and that the assistance cannot be obtained on economically feasible terms in the private market.
Under existing law, before certain city, county, or city and county property is sold or leased for economic development purposes, approval of the sale or lease by the legislative body by resolution, after a public hearing, is required. Existing law requires that resolution to contain a finding that the sale or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity, as defined.
This bill would repeal the existing requirement for approval of the sale or lease by the legislative body by resolution before certain city, county, or city and county property is sold or leased for economic development purposes. The This bill would recast these provisions to instead authorize a city, county, or city and county to acquire county, with the approval of its legislative body by resolution after a public hearing, to acquire, sell, or lease property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity, as defined. The bill would also authorize a city, county, or city and county to sell or lease property to create an economic opportunity. The bill would require the acquisition, sale, or lease to be approved by the legislative body by resolution after a public hearing. The bill would require the resolution to contain a finding that the acquisition, sale, or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity and would require the creation of an economic opportunity to be subject to specified public notice and hearing provisions.
Existing law prohibits the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes.
This bill would prohibit a city, county, or city and county from selling, leasing, or otherwise transferring, at a price that is less than the fair market value, for economic development purposes, any real property that was acquired through eminent domain, except as specified.
Existing law authorizes a city, county, or city and county to establish a program under which it loans funds to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures.
This bill would revise that authorization by requiring the loan to be in the form of a written loan agreement that includes a payment schedule, the terms for interest calculation, the rights and remedies of the parties in case of default, and any other material terms of the loan. The bill would require, prior to entering into that loan agreement, the city, county, or city and county to find, after a public hearing, that the assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the development and that the assistance cannot be obtained on economically feasible terms in the private market.
Under existing law, before certain city, county, or city and county property is sold or leased for economic development purposes, approval of the sale or lease by the legislative body by resolution, after a public hearing, is required. Existing law requires that resolution to contain a finding that the sale or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity, as defined.
This bill would repeal the existing requirement for approval of the sale or lease by the legislative body by resolution before certain city, county, or city and county property is sold or leased for economic development purposes. The bill would instead authorize a city, county, or city and county to acquire property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity, as defined. The bill would also authorize a city, county, or city and county to sell or lease property to create an economic opportunity. The bill would require the acquisition, sale, or lease to be approved by the legislative body by resolution after a public hearing. The bill would require the resolution to contain a finding that the acquisition, sale, or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity and would require the creation of an economic opportunity to be subject to specified public notice and hearing provisions.
Existing law authorizes a city, county, or city and county to establish a program under which it loans funds to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures.
This bill would revise that authorization by requiring the loan to be in the form of a written loan agreement that includes a payment schedule, the terms for interest calculation, the rights and remedies of the parties in case of default, and any other material terms of the loan. The bill would require, prior to entering into that loan agreement, the city, county, or city and county to find, after a public hearing, that the assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the development and that the assistance cannot be obtained on economically feasible terms in the private market.
The Permit Streamlining Act governs the approval process that a city, county, or city and county is required to follow when approving, among other things, a project that is located within a flood hazard zone, a permit for a hazardous waste facility project, and a permit for construction or reconstruction for a development project for a wireless telecommunications facility.
This bill would require state and local agencies to encourage the installation of broadband by eliminating barriers that restrict broadband deployment. The bill would also require that strand-mounted antennas, as defined, that were previously in accordance with state or local government permitting requirements be exempt from additional permit requirements. The bill would make findings and declarations in this regard including that this constitutes a matter of statewide concern.
The Permit Streamlining Act governs the approval process that a city, county, or city and county is required to follow when approving, among other things, a project that is located within a flood hazard zone, a permit for a hazardous waste facility project, and a permit for construction or reconstruction for a development project for a wireless telecommunications facility.
This bill would require state and local agencies to encourage the installation of broadband by eliminating barriers that restrict broadband deployment. The bill would also require that strand-mounted antennas, as defined, that were previously in accordance with state or local government permitting requirements be exempt from additional permit requirements. The bill would make findings and declarations in this regard including that this constitutes a matter of statewide concern.
(1)Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies and community development agencies as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the designation of successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies, subject to review by oversight boards, and to, among other things, make payments due for enforceable obligations and to perform obligations required pursuant to any enforceable obligation. Existing law requires the Department of Finance to issue a finding of completion to a successor agency upon confirmation by the county auditor-controller that specified payments have been fully made by the successor agency. Existing law prohibits a successor agency from entering into contracts with, incurring obligations or making commitments to, any entity, as specified; or from amending or modifying existing agreements, obligations, or commitments with any entity, for any purpose.
This bill would authorize a successor agency, if the successor agency has received a finding of completion, to amend or modify existing contracts and agreements, or otherwise administer projects in connection with enforceable obligations, if the contract, agreement, or project will not commit new property tax funds or otherwise adversely affect the flow of specified tax revenues or payments to the taxing agencies, as specified.
(2)Existing law requires each successor agency to have an oversight board composed of 7 members and requires each member to be appointed by a specified authority.
This bill would allow each appointing authority to appoint alternate representatives to serve on the oversight board as may be necessary. This bill would provide that an alternate representative has the same participatory and voting rights as all other attending members of the oversight board, and would require the successor agency to promptly notify the Department of Finance regarding the appointment of any alternate representatives.
(3)Existing law requires the disposition of assets and properties of the former redevelopment agency as directed by the oversight board, as specified, and suspends these requirements until the Department of Finance has approved a long-range property management plan, as specified. Upon approval of a long-range property management plan, the plan governs and supersedes all other provisions relating to the disposition and use of the real property assets of the former redevelopment agency. Existing law requires the property of a former redevelopment agency to be disposed of according to law if the department has not approved a long-range property management plan by January 1, 2016.
This bill would authorize the department to require a compensation agreement or agreements, but would specify that the compensation agreement or agreements may be developed and executed subsequent to the approval of a long-range property management plan. The bill would describe the criteria and standard to be applied by the department in approving a long-range property management plan. The bill would require the department to approve long-range property management plans as expeditiously as possible. This bill would also provide that actions relating to the disposition of property after approval of a long-range property management plan do not require review by the department.
(1)Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies and community development agencies as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the designation of successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies, subject to review by oversight boards, and to, among other things, make payments due for enforceable obligations and to perform obligations required pursuant to any enforceable obligation. Existing law requires the Department of Finance to issue a finding of completion to a successor agency upon confirmation by the county auditor-controller that specified payments have been fully made by the successor agency. Existing law prohibits a successor agency from entering into contracts with, incurring obligations or making commitments to, any entity, as specified; or from amending or modifying existing agreements, obligations, or commitments with any entity, for any purpose. Existing law defines enforceable obligation for these purposes to generally exclude any agreements, contracts, or arrangements between the city, county, or city and county that created the redevelopment agency and the former redevelopment agency.
This bill would authorize a successor agency, if the successor agency has received a finding of completion, to amend or modify existing, existing contracts and agreements, or otherwise administer projects in connection with enforceable obligations, if the contract, agreement, or project will not commit new property tax funds or otherwise adversely affect the flow of specified tax revenues or payments to the taxing agencies, as specified.
The bill would specifically include within the definition of enforceable obligation an agreement entered into by the redevelopment agency prior to June 30, 2011, if the agreement relates to state highway infrastructure improvements to which the redevelopment agency committed funds pursuant to specified law.
(2)Existing law requires each successor agency to have an oversight board composed of 7 members and requires each member to be appointed by a specified authority.
This bill would allow each appointing authority to appoint alternate representatives to serve on the oversight board as may be necessary. This bill would provide that an alternative alternate representative has the same participatory and voting rights as all other attending members of the oversight board, and would require the successor agency to promptly notify the Department of Finance regarding the appointment of any alternate representatives.
(3)Existing law requires the disposition of assets and properties of the former redevelopment agency as directed by the oversight board, as specified, and suspends these requirements until the Department of Finance has approved a long-range property management plan, as specified. Upon approval of a long-range property management plan, the plan governs and supersedes all other provisions relating to the disposition and use of the real property assets of the former redevelopment agency. Existing law requires the property of a former redevelopment agency to be disposed of according to law if the department has not approved a long-range property management plan by January 1, 2016.
This bill would authorize the department to require a compensation agreement or agreements, but would specify that the compensation agreement or agreements may be developed and executed subsequent to the approval of a long-range property management plan. The bill would describe the criteria and standard to be applied by the department in approving a long-range property management plan. The bill would require the department to approve long-range property management plans as expeditiously as possible. This bill would also provide that actions relating to the disposition of property after approval of a long-range property management plan do not require review by the department.
(1)Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies and community development agencies as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the designation of successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies, subject to review by oversight boards, and to, among other things, make payments due for enforceable obligations and to perform obligations required pursuant to any enforceable obligation. Existing law requires the Department of Finance to issue a finding of completion to a successor agency upon confirmation by the county auditor-controller that specified payments have been fully made by the successor agency. Existing law prohibits a successor agency from entering into contracts with, incurring obligations or making commitments to, any entity, as specified; or from amending or modifying existing agreements, obligations, or commitments with any entity, for any purpose. Existing law defines enforceable obligation for these purposes to generally exclude any agreements, contracts, or arrangements between the city, county, or city and county that created the redevelopment agency and the former redevelopment agency.
This bill would authorize a successor agency, if the successor agency has received a finding of completion, to enter into, or amend or modify existing, contracts and agreements, or otherwise administer projects in connection with enforceable obligations, if the contract, agreement, or project will not commit new property tax funds or otherwise adversely affect the flow of specified tax revenues or payments to the taxing agencies, as specified.
The bill would specifically include within the definition of enforceable obligation an agreement entered into by the redevelopment agency prior to June 30, 2011, if the agreement relates to state highway infrastructure improvements to which the redevelopment agency committed funds pursuant to specified law.
(2)Existing law requires each successor agency to have an oversight board composed of 7 members and requires each member to be appointed by a specified authority.
This bill would allow each appointing authority to appoint an alternate representative representatives to serve on the oversight board as may be necessary. This bill would provide that the an alternative representative has the same participatory and voting rights as all other attending members of the oversight board, and would require the successor agency to promptly notify the Department of Finance regarding the appointment of any alternate representative. representatives.
(3)Existing law requires the disposition of assets and properties of the former redevelopment agency as directed by the oversight board, as specified, and suspends these requirements until the Department of Finance has approved a long-range property management plan, as specified. Upon approval of a long-range property management plan, the plan governs and supersedes all other provisions relating to the disposition and use of the real property assets of the former redevelopment agency. Existing law requires the property of a former redevelopment agency to be disposed of according to law if the department has not approved a long-range property management plan by January 1, 2016.
This bill would authorize the department to require a compensation agreement or agreements, but would prohibit the department from requiring approval of specify that the compensation agreement or agreements as part of may be developed and executed subsequent to the approval of a long-range property management plan. The bill would describe the criteria and standard to be applied by the department in approving a long-range property management plan. The bill would require the department to approve long-range property management plans as expeditiously as possible. This bill would also provide that actions relating to the disposition of property after approval of a long-range property management plan do not require review by the department.
(1)Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies and community development agencies as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the designation of successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies, subject to review by oversight boards, and to, among other things, make payments due for enforceable obligations and to perform obligations required pursuant to any enforceable obligation. Existing law requires the Department of Finance to issue a finding of completion to a successor agency upon confirmation by the county auditor-controller that specified payments have been fully made by the successor agency. Existing law prohibits a successor agency from entering into contracts with, incurring obligations or making commitments to, any entity, as specified; or from amending or modifying existing agreements, obligations, or commitments with any entity, for any purpose. Existing law defines enforceable obligation for these purposes to generally exclude any agreements, contracts, or arrangements between the city, county, or city and county that created the redevelopment agency and the former redevelopment agency.
This bill would authorize a successor agency, if the successor agency has received a finding of completion, to enter into, or amend existing, contracts and agreements, or otherwise administer projects in connection with enforceable obligations, if the contract, agreement, or project will not commit new property tax funds or otherwise adversely affect the flow of specified tax revenues or payments to the taxing agencies, as specified.
The bill would specifically include within the definition of enforceable obligation an agreement entered into by the redevelopment agency prior to June 30, 2011, if the agreement relates to state highway infrastructure improvements to which the redevelopment agency committed funds pursuant to specified law.
(2)Existing law requires each successor agency to have an oversight board composed of 7 members and requires each member to be appointed by a specified authority.
This bill would allow each appointing authority to appoint an alternate representative to serve on the oversight board as may be necessary. This bill would provide that the alternative representative has the same participatory and voting rights as all other attending members of the oversight board, and would require the successor agency to promptly notify the Department of Finance regarding the appointment of any alternate representative.
(3)Existing law requires the disposition of assets and properties of the former redevelopment agency as directed by the oversight board, as specified, and suspends these requirements until the Department of Finance has approved a long-range property management plan, as specified. Upon approval of a long-range property management plan, the plan governs and supersedes all other provisions relating to the disposition and use of the real property assets of the former redevelopment agency. Existing law requires the property of a former redevelopment agency to be disposed of according to law if the department has not approved a long-range property management plan by January 1, 2016.
This bill would authorize the department to require a compensation agreement or agreements, but would prohibit the department from requiring approval of the compensation agreement or agreements as part of the approval of a long-range property management plan. The bill would describe the criteria and standard to be applied by the department in approving a long-range property management plan. The bill would require the department to approve long-range property management plans as expeditiously as possible. This bill would also provide that actions relating to the disposition of property after approval of a long-range property management plan do not require review by the department.
As used in this part, economic opportunity means any of the following:
(a)Development agreements, loan agreements, sale agreements, lease agreements, or other agreements that create, retain, or expand new jobs, in which the legislative body finds that the agreement will create or retain at least one full-time equivalent, permanent job for every thirty-five thousand dollars ($35,000) of city, county, or city and county investment in the project after full capacity and implementation.
(b)Development agreements, loan agreements, sale agreements, lease agreements, or other agreements that increase property tax revenues to all property tax collecting entities, in which the legislative body finds that the agreement will result in an increase of at least 15 percent of total property tax resulting from the project at full implementation when compared to the year prior to the property being acquired by the government entity.
(c)Creation of affordable housing, if a demonstrated affordable housing need exists in the community, as defined in the approved housing element or regional housing needs assessment.
(d)Projects that meet the goals set forth in Chapter 728 of the Statutes of 2008 and have been included in an adopted sustainable communities strategy or alternative planning strategy or a project that specifically implements the goals of those adopted plans.
(e)Transit priority projects, as defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code.
SEC. 2.Section 52200.6 of the Government Code is amended to read:52200.6.(a)(1)This part shall not be interpreted to authorize the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes.
(2)For the purposes of this part, a city, county, or city and county shall not sell, lease, or otherwise transfer, at a price that is less than the fair market value, any real property that was acquired through eminent domain. This prohibition shall not apply to either of the following:
(A)Any real property governed by a long-range property management plan pursuant to Section 34191.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
(B)Any housing asset transferred to a city, county, or city and county pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 34176 of the Health and Safety Code or subdivision (c) of Section 34181 of the Health and Safety Code, provided that the successor agency or the designated local authority in the affected jurisdiction has received a finding of completion from the Department of Finance pursuant to Section 34179.7 of the Health and Safety Code.
(b)The creation of an economic opportunity pursuant to this part shall be subject to the provisions of Section 53083.
(c)The provisions of this part shall be an alternative to any authority of a city, county, or city and county to create an economic opportunity or to acquire, sell, or lease property for economic development, found in the Constitution, state law, local ordinance, or charter. This part does not limit, or in any way affect, the application of any other such laws.
SEC. 3.Section 52201 of the Government Code is amended to read:52201.(a)(1)A city, county, or city and county may acquire property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity. A city, county, or city and county may sell or lease property to create an economic opportunity. The acquisition, sale, or lease shall first be approved by the legislative body by resolution after a public hearing. Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the community at least once per week for at least two successive weeks, as specified in Section 6066, prior to the hearing.
(2)The city, county, or city and county shall make available, for public inspection and copying at a cost not to exceed the cost of duplication, a report no later than the time of publication of the first notice of the hearing mandated by this section. This report shall contain both of the following:
(A)A copy of the proposed acquisition, sale, or lease.
(B)A summary that describes and specifies all of the following:
(i)The cost of the agreement to the city, county, or city and county, including land acquisition costs, clearance costs, relocation costs, the costs of any improvements to be provided by the city, county, or city and county, plus the expected interest on any loans or bonds to finance the agreements.
(ii)For the sale or lease of property, the estimated value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the highest and best uses permitted under the general plan or zoning.
(iii)For the sale or lease of property, the estimated value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the use and with the conditions, covenants, and development costs required by the sale or lease. The purchase price or present value of the lease payments which the lessor will be required to make during the term of the lease. If the sale price or total rental amount is less than the fair market value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the highest and best use, then the city, county, or city and county shall provide as part of the summary an explanation of the reasons for the difference.
(iv)An explanation of why the acquisition, sale, or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity, with reference to all supporting facts and materials relied upon in making this explanation.
(b)The resolution approving the acquisition, sale, or lease shall be adopted by a majority vote unless the legislative body has provided by ordinance for a two-thirds vote for that purpose and shall contain a finding that the acquisition, sale, or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity. For the sale or lease of property, the resolution shall also contain one of the following findings:
(1)The consideration is not less than the fair market value at its highest and best use.
(2)The consideration is not less than the fair reuse value at the use and with the covenants and conditions and development costs authorized by the sale or lease.
(c)The provisions of this section are an alternative to any other authority granted by law to cities to dispose of city-owned property.
SEC. 4.Section 52202 of the Government Code is amended to read:52202.(a)A city, county, or city and county may loan funds to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures. The loan shall be in the form of a written loan agreement that includes a payment schedule, the terms for interest calculation, the rights and remedies of the parties in case of default, and any other material terms of the loan.
(b)Prior to entering into a loan agreement pursuant to this section, the city, county, or city and county shall find, after a public hearing, that the assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the development and that the assistance cannot be obtained on economically feasible terms in the private market.
As used in this part, economic opportunity means any of the following:
(a)Development agreements, loan agreements, sale agreements, lease agreements, or other agreements that create, retain, or expand new jobs, in which the legislative body finds that the agreement will create or retain at least one full-time equivalent, permanent job for every thirty-five thousand dollars ($35,000) of city, county, or city and county investment in the project after full capacity and implementation.
(b)Development agreements, loan agreements, sale agreements, lease agreements, or other agreements that increase property tax revenues to all property tax collecting entities, in which the legislative body finds that the agreement will result in an increase of at least 15 percent of total property tax resulting from the project at full implementation when compared to the year prior to the property being acquired by the government entity.
(c)Creation of affordable housing, if a demonstrated affordable housing need exists in the community, as defined in the approved housing element or regional housing needs assessment.
(d)Projects that meet the goals set forth in Chapter 728 of the Statutes of 2008 and have been included in an adopted sustainable communities strategy or alternative planning strategy or a project that specifically implements the goals of those adopted plans.
(e)Transit priority projects, as defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code.
SEC. 2.Section 52200.6 of the Government Code is amended to read:52200.6.(a)(1)This part shall not be interpreted to authorize the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes.
(2)For the purposes of this part, a city, county, or city and county shall not sell, lease, or otherwise transfer, at a price that is less than the fair market value, any real property that was acquired through eminent domain. This prohibition shall not apply to either of the following:
(A)Any real property governed by a long-range property management plan pursuant to Section 34191.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
(B)Any housing asset transferred to a city, county, or city and county pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 34176 of the Health and Safety Code or subdivision (c) of Section 34181 of the Health and Safety Code, provided that the successor agency or the designated local authority in the affected jurisdiction has received a finding of completion from the Department of Finance pursuant to Section 34179.7 of the Health and Safety Code.
(b)The creation of an economic opportunity pursuant to this part shall be subject to the provisions of Section 53083.
(c)The provisions of this part shall be an alternative to any authority of a city, county, or city and county to create an economic opportunity or to acquire, sell, or lease property for economic development, found in the Constitution, state law, local ordinance, or charter. This part does not limit, or in any way affect, the application of any other such laws.
SEC. 3.Section 52201 of the Government Code is amended to read:52201.(a)(1)A city, county, or city and county may acquire property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity. A city, county, or city and county may sell or lease property to create an economic opportunity. The acquisition, sale, or lease shall first be approved by the legislative body by resolution after a public hearing. Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the community at least once per week for at least two successive weeks, as specified in Section 6066, prior to the hearing.
(2)The city, county, or city and county shall make available, for public inspection and copying at a cost not to exceed the cost of duplication, a report no later than the time of publication of the first notice of the hearing mandated by this section. This report shall contain both of the following:
(A)A copy of the proposed acquisition, sale, or lease.
(B)A summary that describes and specifies all of the following:
(i)The cost of the agreement to the city, county, or city and county, including land acquisition costs, clearance costs, relocation costs, the costs of any improvements to be provided by the city, county, or city and county, plus the expected interest on any loans or bonds to finance the agreements.
(ii)For the sale or lease of property, the estimated value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the highest and best uses permitted under the general plan or zoning.
(iii)For the sale or lease of property, the estimated value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the use and with the conditions, covenants, and development costs required by the sale or lease. The purchase price or present value of the lease payments which the lessor will be required to make during the term of the lease. If the sale price or total rental amount is less than the fair market value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the highest and best use, then the city, county, or city and county shall provide as part of the summary an explanation of the reasons for the difference.
(iv)An explanation of why the acquisition, sale, or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity, with reference to all supporting facts and materials relied upon in making this explanation.
(b)The resolution approving the acquisition, sale, or lease shall be adopted by a majority vote unless the legislative body has provided by ordinance for a two-thirds vote for that purpose and shall contain a finding that the acquisition, sale, or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity. For the sale or lease of property, the resolution shall also contain one of the following findings:
(1)The consideration is not less than the fair market value at its highest and best use.
(2)The consideration is not less than the fair reuse value at the use and with the covenants and conditions and development costs authorized by the sale or lease.
(c)The provisions of this section are an alternative to any other authority granted by law to cities to dispose of city-owned property.
SEC. 4.Section 52202 of the Government Code is amended to read:52202.(a)A city, county, or city and county may loan funds to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures. The loan shall be in the form of a written loan agreement that includes a payment schedule, the terms for interest calculation, the rights and remedies of the parties in case of default, and any other material terms of the loan.
(b)Prior to entering into a loan agreement pursuant to this section, the city, county, or city and county shall find, after a public hearing, that the assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the development and that the assistance cannot be obtained on economically feasible terms in the private market.
As used in this part, economic opportunity means any of the following:
(a)Development agreements, loan agreements, sale agreements, lease agreements, or other agreements that create, retain, or expand new jobs, in which the legislative body finds that the agreement will create or retain at least one full-time equivalent, permanent job for every thirty-five thousand dollars ($35,000) of city, county, or city and county investment in the project after full capacity and implementation.
(b)Development agreements, loan agreements, sale agreements, lease agreements, or other agreements that increase property tax revenues to all property tax collecting entities, in which the legislative body finds that the agreement will result in an increase of at least 15 percent of total property tax resulting from the project at full implementation when compared to the year prior to the property being acquired by the government entity.
(c)Creation of affordable housing, if a demonstrated affordable housing need exists in the community, as defined in the approved housing element or regional housing needs assessment.
(d)Projects that meet the goals set forth in Chapter 728 of the Statutes of 2008 and have been included in an adopted sustainable communities strategy or alternative planning strategy or a project that specifically implements the goals of those adopted plans.
(e)Transit priority projects, as defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code.
SEC. 2.Section 52200.6 of the Government Code is amended to read:52200.6.(a)(1)This part shall not be interpreted to authorize the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes.
(2)For the purposes of this part, a city, county, or city and county shall not sell, lease, or otherwise transfer, at a price that is less than the fair market value, any real property that was acquired through eminent domain. This prohibition shall not apply to either of the following:
(A)Any real property governed by a long-range property management plan pursuant to Section 34191.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
(B)Any housing asset transferred to a city, county, or city and county pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 34176 of the Health and Safety Code or subdivision (c) of Section 34181 of the Health and Safety Code, provided that the successor agency or the designated local authority in the affected jurisdiction has received a finding of completion from the Department of Finance pursuant to Section 34179.7 of the Health and Safety Code.
(b)The creation of an economic opportunity pursuant to this part shall be subject to the provisions of Section 53083.
(c)The provisions of this part shall be an alternative to any authority of a city, county, or city and county to create an economic opportunity or to acquire, sell, or lease property for economic development, found in the Constitution, state law, local ordinance, or charter. This part does not limit, or in any way affect, the application of any other such laws.
SEC. 3.Section 52201 of the Government Code is amended to read:52201.(a)(1)A city, county, or city and county may acquire property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity. A city, county, or city and county may sell or lease property to create an economic opportunity. The acquisition, sale, or lease shall first be approved by the legislative body by resolution after a public hearing. Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the community at least once per week for at least two successive weeks, as specified in Section 6066, prior to the hearing.
(2)The city, county, or city and county shall make available, for public inspection and copying at a cost not to exceed the cost of duplication, a report no later than the time of publication of the first notice of the hearing mandated by this section. This report shall contain both of the following:
(A)A copy of the proposed acquisition, sale, or lease.
(B)A summary that describes and specifies all of the following:
(i)The cost of the agreement to the city, county, or city and county, including land acquisition costs, clearance costs, relocation costs, the costs of any improvements to be provided by the city, county, or city and county, plus the expected interest on any loans or bonds to finance the agreements.
(ii)For the sale or lease of property, the estimated value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the highest and best uses permitted under the general plan or zoning.
(iii)For the sale or lease of property, the estimated value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the use and with the conditions, covenants, and development costs required by the sale or lease. The purchase price or present value of the lease payments which the lessor will be required to make during the term of the lease. If the sale price or total rental amount is less than the fair market value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the highest and best use, then the city, county, or city and county shall provide as part of the summary an explanation of the reasons for the difference.
(iv)An explanation of why the acquisition, sale, or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity, with reference to all supporting facts and materials relied upon in making this explanation.
(b)The resolution approving the acquisition, sale, or lease shall be adopted by a majority vote unless the legislative body has provided by ordinance for a two-thirds vote for that purpose and shall contain a finding that the acquisition, sale, or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity. For the sale or lease of property, the resolution shall also contain one of the following findings:
(1)The consideration is not less than the fair market value at its highest and best use.
(2)The consideration is not less than the fair reuse value at the use and with the covenants and conditions and development costs authorized by the sale or lease.
(c)The provisions of this section are an alternative to any other authority granted by law to cities to dispose of city-owned property.
SEC. 4.Section 52202 of the Government Code is amended to read:52202.(a)A city, county, or city and county may loan funds to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures. The loan shall be in the form of a written loan agreement that includes a payment schedule, the terms for interest calculation, the rights and remedies of the parties in case of default, and any other material terms of the loan.
(b)Prior to entering into a loan agreement pursuant to this section, the city, county, or city and county shall find, after a public hearing, that the assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the development and that the assistance cannot be obtained on economically feasible terms in the private market.
As used in this part part, economic opportunity means any of the following:
(a)Development agreements, loan agreements, sale agreements, lease agreements, or other agreements that create, retain, or expand new jobs, in which the legislative body finds that the agreement will create or retain at least one full-time equivalent, permanent job for every thirty-five thousand dollars ($35,000) of city, county, or city and county investment in the project after full capacity and implementation.
(b)Development agreements, loan agreements, sale agreements, lease agreements, or other agreements that increase property tax revenues to all property tax collecting entities, in which the legislative body finds that the agreement will result in an increase of at least 15 percent of total property tax resulting from the project at full implementation when compared to the year prior to the property being acquired by the government entity.
(c)Creation of affordable housing, if a demonstrated affordable housing need exists in the community, as defined in the approved housing element or regional housing needs assessment.
(d)Projects that meet the goals set forth in Chapter 728 of the Statutes of 2008 and have been included in an adopted sustainable communities strategy or alternative planning strategy or a project that specifically implements the goals of those adopted plans.
(e)Transit priority projects, as defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code.
SEC. 2.Section 52200.6 of the Government Code is amended to read:52200.6.(a)(1)This part shall not be interpreted to authorize the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes.
(2)For the purposes of this part, a city, county, or city and county shall not sell, lease, or otherwise transfer, at a price that is less than the fair market value, any real property that was acquired through eminent domain. This prohibition shall not apply to any either of the following:
(A)Any real property governed by a long-range property management plan pursuant to Section 34191.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
(B)Any housing asset transferred to a city and county pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 34176 of the Health and Safety Code or subdivision (c) of Section 34181 of the Health and Safety Code, provided that the successor agency or the designated local authority in the affected jurisdiction has received a finding of completion from the Department of Finance pursuant to Section 34179.7 of the Health and Safety Code.
(b)The creation of an economic opportunity pursuant to this part shall be subject to the provisions of Section 53083.
(c)The provisions of this part shall be an alternative to any authority of a city, county, or city and county to create an economic opportunity or to acquire, sell, or lease property for economic development, found in the Constitution, state law, local ordinance, or charter. This part does not limit, or in any way affect, the application of any other such laws.
SEC. 3.Section 52201 of the Government Code is amended to read:52201.(a)(1)A city, county, or city and county may acquire property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity. A city, county, or city and county may sell or lease property to create an economic opportunity. The acquisition, sale, or lease shall first be approved by the legislative body by resolution after a public hearing. Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the community at least once per week for at least two successive weeks, as specified in Section 6066, prior to the hearing.
(2)The city, county, or city and county shall make available, for public inspection and copying at a cost not to exceed the cost of duplication, a report no later than the time of publication of the first notice of the hearing mandated by this section. This report shall contain both of the following:
(A)A copy of the proposed acquisition, sale, or lease.
(B)A summary that describes and specifies all of the following:
(i)The cost of the agreement to the city, county, or city and county, including land acquisition costs, clearance costs, relocation costs, the costs of any improvements to be provided by the city, county, or city and county, plus the expected interest on any loans or bonds to finance the agreements.
(ii)For the sale or lease of property, the estimated value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the highest and best uses permitted under the general plan or zoning.
(iii)For the sale or lease of property, the estimated value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the use and with the conditions, covenants, and development costs required by the sale or lease. The purchase price or present value of the lease payments which the lessor will be required to make during the term of the lease. If the sale price or total rental amount is less than the fair market value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the highest and best use, then the city, county, or city and county shall provide as part of the summary an explanation of the reasons for the difference.
(iv)An explanation of why the acquisition, sale, or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity, with reference to all supporting facts and materials relied upon in making this explanation.
(b)The resolution approving the acquisition, sale, or lease shall be adopted by a majority vote unless the legislative body has provided by ordinance for a two-thirds vote for that purpose and shall contain a finding that the acquisition, sale, or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity. For the sale or lease of property, the resolution shall also contain one of the following findings:
(1)The consideration is not less than the fair market value at its highest and best use.
(2)The consideration is not less than the fair reuse value at the use and with the covenants and conditions and development costs authorized by the sale or lease.
(c)The provisions of this section are an alternative to any other authority granted by law to cities to dispose of city-owned property.
SEC. 4.Section 52202 of the Government Code is amended to read:52202.(a)A city, county, or city and county may loan funds to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures. The loan shall be in the form of a written loan agreement that includes a payment schedule, the terms for interest calculation, the rights and remedies of the parties in case of default, and any other material terms of the loan.
(b)Prior to entering into a loan agreement pursuant to this section, the city, county, or city and county shall find, after a public hearing, that the assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the development and that the assistance cannot be obtained on economically feasible terms in the private market.
As used in this part economic opportunity means any of the following:
(a)Development agreements, loan agreements, sale agreements, lease agreements, or other agreements that create, retain, or expand new jobs, in which the legislative body finds that the agreement will create or retain at least one full-time equivalent, permanent job for every thirty-five thousand dollars ($35,000) of city, county, or city and county investment in the project after full capacity and implementation.
(b)Development agreements, loan agreements, sale agreements, lease agreements, or other agreements that increase property tax revenues to all property tax collecting entities, in which the legislative body finds that the agreement will result in an increase of at least 15 percent of total property tax resulting from the project at full implementation when compared to the year prior to the property being acquired by the government entity.
(c)Creation of affordable housing, if a demonstrated affordable housing need exists in the community, as defined in the approved housing element or regional housing needs assessment.
(d)Projects that meet the goals set forth in Chapter 728 of the Statutes of 2008 and have been included in an adopted sustainable communities strategy or alternative planning strategy or a project that specifically implements the goals of those adopted plans.
(e)Transit priority projects, as defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code.
SEC. 2.Section 52200.6 of the Government Code is amended to read:52200.6.(a)(1)This part shall not be interpreted to authorize the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes.
(2)For the purposes of this part, a city, county, or city and county shall not sell, lease, or otherwise transfer, at a price that is less than the fair market value, any real property that was acquired through eminent domain. This prohibition shall not apply to any real property governed by a long-range property management plan pursuant to Section 34191.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
(b)The creation of an economic opportunity pursuant to this part shall be subject to the provisions of Section 53083.
(c)The provisions of this part shall be an alternative to any authority of a city, county, or city and county to create an economic opportunity or to acquire, sell, or lease property for economic development, found in the Constitution, state law, local ordinance, or charter. This part does not limit, or in any way affect, the application of any other such laws.
SEC. 3.Section 52201 of the Government Code is amended to read:52201.(a)(1)A city, county, or city and county may acquire property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity. A city, county, or city and county may sell or lease property to create an economic opportunity. The acquisition, sale, or lease shall first be approved by the legislative body by resolution after a public hearing. Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the community at least once per week for at least two successive weeks, as specified in Section 6066, prior to the hearing.
(2)The city, county, or city and county shall make available, for public inspection and copying at a cost not to exceed the cost of duplication, a report no later than the time of publication of the first notice of the hearing mandated by this section. This report shall contain both of the following:
(A)A copy of the proposed acquisition, sale, or lease.
(B)A summary that describes and specifies all of the following:
(i)The cost of the agreement to the city, county, or city and county, including land acquisition costs, clearance costs, relocation costs, the costs of any improvements to be provided by the city, county, or city and county, plus the expected interest on any loans or bonds to finance the agreements.
(ii)For the sale or lease of property, the estimated value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the highest and best uses permitted under the general plan or zoning.
(iii)For the sale or lease of property, the estimated value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the use and with the conditions, covenants, and development costs required by the sale or lease. The purchase price or present value of the lease payments which the lessor will be required to make during the term of the lease. If the sale price or total rental amount is less than the fair market value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the highest and best use, then the city, county, or city and county shall provide as part of the summary an explanation of the reasons for the difference.
(iv)An explanation of why the acquisition, sale, or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity, with reference to all supporting facts and materials relied upon in making this explanation.
(b)The resolution approving the acquisition, sale, or lease shall be adopted by a majority vote unless the legislative body has provided by ordinance for a two-thirds vote for that purpose and shall contain a finding that the acquisition, sale, or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity. For the sale or lease of property, the resolution shall also contain one of the following findings:
(1)The consideration is not less than the fair market value at its highest and best use.
(2)The consideration is not less than the fair reuse value at the use and with the covenants and conditions and development costs authorized by the sale or lease.
(c)The provisions of this section are an alternative to any other authority granted by law to cities to dispose of city-owned property.
SEC. 4.Section 52202 of the Government Code is amended to read:52202.(a)A city, county, or city and county may loan funds to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures. The loan shall be in the form of a written loan agreement that includes a payment schedule, the terms for interest calculation, the rights and remedies of the parties in case of default, and any other material terms of the loan.
(b)Prior to entering into a loan agreement pursuant to this section, the city, county, or city and county shall find, after a public hearing, that the assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the development and that the assistance cannot be obtained on economically feasible terms in the private market.
SEC. 5.Section 52204 is added to the Government Code, to read:52204.The determinations made by a legislative body pursuant to this part shall be final and conclusive.
As used in this part economic opportunity means any of the following:
(a)Development agreements, loan agreements, sale agreements, lease agreements, or other agreements that create, retain, or expand new jobs, in which the legislative body finds that the agreement will create or retain at least one full-time equivalent, permanent job for every thirty-five thousand dollars ($35,000) of city, county, or city and county investment in the project after full capacity and implementation.
(b)Development agreements, loan agreements, sale agreements, lease agreements, or other agreements that increase property tax revenues to all property tax collecting entities, in which the legislative body finds that the agreement will result in an increase of at least 15 percent of total property tax resulting from the project at full implementation when compared to the year prior to the property being acquired by the government entity.
(c)Creation of affordable housing, if a demonstrated affordable housing need exists in the community, as defined in the approved housing element or regional housing needs assessment.
(d)Projects that meet the goals set forth in Chapter 728 of the Statutes of 2008 and have been included in an adopted sustainable communities strategy or alternative planning strategy or a project that specifically implements the goals of those adopted plans.
(e)Transit priority projects, as defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code.
(f)The acquisition of property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity, as described in subdivisions (a) to (e), inclusive.
SEC. 2.Section 52200.6 of the Government Code is amended to read:52200.6.(a)(1)This part shall not be interpreted to authorize the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes.
(2)For the purposes of this part, a city, county, or city and county shall not sell, lease, or otherwise transfer, at a price that is less than the fair market value, any real property that was acquired through eminent domain. This prohibition shall not apply to any real property governed by a long-range property management plan pursuant to Section 34191.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
(b)The creation of an economic opportunity pursuant to this part shall be subject to the provisions of Section 53083.
(c)The provisions of this part shall be an alternative to any authority of a city, county, or city and county to create an economic opportunity or to acquire, sell, or lease property for economic development, found in the Constitution, state law, local ordinance, or charter. This part does not limit, or in any way affect, the application of any other such laws.
SEC. 3.Section 52201 of the Government Code is amended to read:52201.(a)(1)A city, county, or city and county may acquire property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity. A city, county, or city and county may sell or lease property to create an economic opportunity. The acquisition, sale, or lease shall first be approved by the legislative body by resolution after a public hearing. Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the community at least once per week for at least two successive weeks, as specified in Section 6066, prior to the hearing.
(2)The city, county, or city and county shall make available, for public inspection and copying at a cost not to exceed the cost of duplication, a report no later than the time of publication of the first notice of the hearing mandated by this section. This report shall contain both of the following:
(A)A copy of the proposed acquisition, sale, or lease.
(B)A summary that describes and specifies all of the following:
(i)The cost of the agreement to the city, county, or city and county, including land acquisition costs, clearance costs, relocation costs, the costs of any improvements to be provided by the city, county, or city and county, plus the expected interest on any loans or bonds to finance the agreements.
(ii)For the sale or lease of property, the estimated value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the highest and best uses permitted under the general plan or zoning.
(iii)For the sale or lease of property, the estimated value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the use and with the conditions, covenants, and development costs required by the sale or lease. The purchase price or present value of the lease payments which the lessor will be required to make during the term of the lease. If the sale price or total rental amount is less than the fair market value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the highest and best use, then the city, county, or city and county shall provide as part of the summary an explanation of the reasons for the difference.
(iv)An explanation of why the acquisition, sale, or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity, with reference to all supporting facts and materials relied upon in making this explanation.
(b)The resolution approving the acquisition, sale, or lease shall be adopted by a majority vote unless the legislative body has provided by ordinance for a two-thirds vote for that purpose and shall contain a finding that the acquisition, sale, or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity. For the sale or lease of property, the resolution shall also contain one of the following findings:
(1)The consideration is not less than the fair market value at its highest and best use.
(2)The consideration is not less than the fair reuse value at the use and with the covenants and conditions and development costs authorized by the sale or lease.
(c)The provisions of this section are an alternative to any other authority granted by law to cities to dispose of city-owned property.
SEC. 4.Section 52202 of the Government Code is amended to read:52202.(a)A city, county, or city and county may loan funds to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures. The loan shall be in the form of a written loan agreement that includes a payment schedule, the terms for interest calculation, the rights and remedies of the parties in case of default, and any other material terms of the loan.
(b)Prior to entering into a loan agreement pursuant to this section, the city, county, or city and county shall find, after a public hearing, that the assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the development and that the assistance cannot be obtained on economically feasible terms in the private market.
SEC. 5.Section 52204 is added to the Government Code, to read:52204.The determinations made by a legislative body pursuant to this part shall be final and conclusive.
As used in this part economic opportunity means any of the following:
(a)Development agreements agreements, loan agreements, sale agreements, lease agreements, or other agreements that create, retain, or expand new jobs, in which the legislative body finds that the agreement will create or retain at least one full-time equivalent, permanent job for every thirty-five thousand dollars ($35,000) of city, county, or city and county investment in the project after full capacity and implementation.
(b)Development agreements agreements, loan agreements, sale agreements, lease agreements, or other agreements that increase property tax revenues to all property tax collecting entities, in which the legislative body finds that the agreement will result in an increase of at least 15 percent of total property tax resulting from the project at full implementation when compared to the year prior to the property being acquired by the government entity.
(c)Creation of affordable housing, if a demonstrated affordable housing need exists in the community, as defined in the approved housing element or regional housing needs assessment.
(d)Projects that meet the goals set forth in Chapter 728 of the Statutes of 2008 and have been included in an adopted sustainable communities strategy or alternative planning strategy or a project that specifically implements the goals of those adopted plans.
(e)Transit priority projects, as defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code.
(f)The acquisition of property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity, as described in subdivisions (a) to (e), inclusive.
SEC. 2.Section 52200.6 of the Government Code is amended to read:52200.6.(a)This chapter part shall not be interpreted to authorize the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes.
(b)The creation of an economic opportunity pursuant to this part shall be subject to the provisions of Section 53083.
(c)The provisions of this part shall be an alternative to any authority of a city, county, or city and county to create an economic opportunity or to acquire, sell, or lease property for economic development, found in the Constitution, state law, local ordinance, or charter. This part does not limit, or in any way affect, the application of any other such laws.
SEC. 3.Section 52201 of the Government Code is amended to read:52201.(a)(1)Before any city, county, or city and county property that is returned to the city, county, or city and county per the long-range property management plan, pursuant to Section 34191.5 of the Health and Safety Code, is sold or leased for economic development purposes, the sale A city, county, or city and county may acquire property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity. A city, county, or city and county may sell or lease property to create an economic opportunity. The acquisition, sale, or lease shall first be approved by the legislative body by resolution after a public hearing. Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the community at least once per week for at least two successive weeks, as specified in Section 6066, prior to the hearing.
(2)The city, county, or city and county shall make available, for public inspection and copying at a cost not to exceed the cost of duplication, a report no later than the time of publication of the first notice of the hearing mandated by this section. This report shall contain both of the following:
(A)A copy of the proposed sale acquisition, sale, or lease.
(B)A summary that describes and specifies all of the following:
(i)The cost of the agreement to the city, county, or city and county, including land acquisition costs, clearance costs, relocation costs, the costs of any improvements to be provided by the city, county, or city and county, plus the expected interest on any loans or bonds to finance the agreements.
(ii)The For the sale or lease of property, the estimated value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the highest and best uses permitted under the general plan or zoning.
(iii)The For the sale or lease of property, the estimated value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the use and with the conditions, covenants, and development costs required by the sale or lease. The purchase price or present value of the lease payments which the lessor will be required to make during the term of the lease. If the sale price or total rental amount is less than the fair market value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the highest and best use, then the city, county, or city and county shall provide as part of the summary an explanation of the reasons for the difference.
(iv)An explanation of why the sale acquisition, sale, or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity, with reference to all supporting facts and materials relied upon in making this explanation.
(b)The resolution approving the lease or sale acquisition, sale, or lease shall be adopted by a majority vote unless the legislative body has provided by ordinance for a two-thirds vote for that purpose and shall contain a finding that the sale acquisition, sale, or lease of the property will assist in the creation of economic opportunity. The For the sale or lease of property, the resolution shall also contain one of the following findings:
(1)The consideration is not less than the fair market value at its highest and best use.
(2)The consideration is not less than the fair reuse value at the use and with the covenants and conditions and development costs authorized by the sale or lease.
(c)The provisions of this section are an alternative to any other authority granted by law to cities to dispose of city-owned property.
SEC. 4.Section 52202 of the Government Code is amended to read:52202.(a)A city, county, or city and county may establish a program under which it loans loan funds to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures. The loan shall be in the form of a written loan agreement that includes a payment schedule, the terms for interest calculation, the rights and remedies of the parties in case of default, and any other material terms of the loan.
(b)Prior to entering into a loan agreement pursuant to this section, the city, county, or city and county shall find, after a public hearing, that the assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the development and that the assistance cannot be obtained on economically feasible terms in the private market.
SEC. 5.Section 52204 is added to the Government Code, to read:52204.The determinations made by a legislative body pursuant to this part shall be final and conclusive.
SECTION 1.Section 65964.5 is added to the Government Code, to read:65964.5.(a)(1)The Legislature hereby finds and declares that communications technology and services, particularly broadband, are criticial the the economic success of this state in the 21st century. Broadband can drive local and state economic growth, as well as improve education, business services, public safety, health care, and energy efficiency.
(2)The Legislature finds and declares that the implementation of consistent statewide policies to achieve timely and cost-effective deployment of broadband is a matter of statewide concern and that this section shall apply to charter cities and charter counties. The provisions of this section shall supersede any inconsistent provisions in the charter of any city, county, or city and county.
(b)It is the intent of the Legislature that state and local agencies not adopt ordinances, resolutions, or regulations that create unreasonable barriers to the installation of broadband. State and local agencies shall encourage the installation of broadband by eliminating barriers that restrict broadband deployment.
(c)(1)A strand-mounted antenna used for the provision of video, voice, or data service that is attached to communications infrastructure that were previously constructed in accordance with state or local permitting requirements shall be exempt from additional permitting requirements.
(2)For the purposes of this section, strand-mounted antenna means a low-powered antenna embedded in or attached to communications cables that are part of a pole-supported overhead communications infrascture. Strand-mounted antenna shall not include a commercial mobile radio services (CMRS) antenna.
(a)(1)The Legislature hereby finds and declares that communications technology and services, particularly broadband, are criticial the the economic success of this state in the 21st century. Broadband can drive local and state economic growth, as well as improve education, business services, public safety, health care, and energy efficiency.
(2)The Legislature finds and declares that the implementation of consistent statewide policies to achieve timely and cost-effective deployment of broadband is a matter of statewide concern and that this section shall apply to charter cities and charter counties. The provisions of this section shall supersede any inconsistent provisions in the charter of any city, county, or city and county.
(b)It is the intent of the Legislature that state and local agencies not adopt ordinances, resolutions, or regulations that create unreasonable barriers to the installation of broadband. State and local agencies shall encourage the installation of broadband by eliminating barriers that restrict broadband deployment.
(c)(1)A strand-mounted antenna used for the provision of video, voice, or data service that is attached to communications infrastructure that were previously constructed in accordance with state or local permitting requirements shall be exempt from additional permitting requirements.
(2)For the purposes of this section, strand-mounted antenna means a low-powered antenna embedded in or attached to communications cables that are part of a pole-supported overhead communications infrascture. Strand-mounted antenna shall not include a commercial mobile radio services (CMRS) antenna.
SECTION 1.Section 34179 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:34179.(a)Each successor agency shall have an oversight board composed of seven members. The members shall elect one of their members as the chairperson and shall report the name of the chairperson and other members to the Department of Finance on or before May 1, 2012. Members shall be selected as follows:
(1)One member appointed by the county board of supervisors.
(2)One member appointed by the mayor for the city that formed the redevelopment agency.
(3)(A)One member appointed by the largest special district, by property tax share, with territory in the territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency, which is of the type of special district that is eligible to receive property tax revenues pursuant to Section 34188.
(B)On or after the effective date of this subparagraph, the county auditor-controller may determine which is the largest special district for purposes of this section.
(4)One member appointed by the county superintendent of education to represent schools if the superintendent is elected. If the county superintendent of education is appointed, then the appointment made pursuant to this paragraph shall be made by the county board of education.
(5)One member appointed by the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges to represent community college districts in the county.
(6)One member of the public appointed by the county board of supervisors.
(7)One member representing the employees of the former redevelopment agency appointed by the mayor or chair of the board of supervisors, as the case may be, from the recognized employee organization representing the largest number of former redevelopment agency employees employed by the successor agency at that time. In the case where city or county employees performed administrative duties of the former redevelopment agency, the appointment shall be made from the recognized employee organization representing those employees. If a recognized employee organization does not exist for either the employees of the former redevelopment agency or the city or county employees performing administrative duties of the former redevelopment agency, the appointment shall be made from among the employees of the successor agency. In voting to approve a contract as an enforceable obligation, a member appointed pursuant to this paragraph shall not be deemed to be interested in the contract by virtue of being an employee of the successor agency or community for purposes of Section 1090 of the Government Code.
(8)If the county or a joint powers agency formed the redevelopment agency, then the largest city by acreage in the territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency may select one member. If there are no cities with territory in a project area of the redevelopment agency, the county superintendent of education may appoint an additional member to represent the public.
(9)If there are no special districts of the type that are eligible to receive property tax pursuant to Section 34188, within the territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency, then the county may appoint one member to represent the public.
(10)If a redevelopment agency was formed by an entity that is both a charter city and a county, the oversight board shall be composed of seven members selected as follows: three members appointed by the mayor of the city, if that appointment is subject to confirmation by the county board of supervisors, one member appointed by the largest special district, by property tax share, with territory in the territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency, which is the type of special district that is eligible to receive property tax revenues pursuant to Section 34188, one member appointed by the county superintendent of education to represent schools, one member appointed by the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges to represent community college districts, and one member representing employees of the former redevelopment agency appointed by the mayor of the city if that appointment is subject to confirmation by the county board of supervisors, to represent the largest number of former redevelopment agency employees employed by the successor agency at that time.
(11)Each appointing authority identified in this subdivision may, but is not required to, appoint alternate representatives to serve on the oversight board as may be necessary to attend any meeting of the oversight board in the event that the appointing authoritys primary representative is unable to attend any meeting for any reason. If an alternate representative attends any meeting in place of the primary representative, the alternate representative shall have the same participatory and voting rights as all other attending members of the oversight board. The successor agency shall promptly notify the department regarding the appointment of alternate representatives to the oversight board.
(b)The Governor may appoint individuals to fill any oversight board member position described in subdivision (a) that has not been filled by May 15, 2012, or any member position that remains vacant for more than 60 days.
(c)The oversight board may direct the staff of the successor agency to perform work in furtherance of the oversight boards duties and responsibilities under this part. The successor agency shall pay for all of the costs of meetings of the oversight board and may include such costs in its administrative budget. Oversight board members shall serve without compensation or reimbursement for expenses.
(d)Oversight board members are protected by the immunities applicable to public entities and public employees governed by Part 1 (commencing with Section 810) and Part 2 (commencing with Section 814) of Division 3.6 of Title 1 of the Government Code.
(e)A majority of the total membership of the oversight board shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. A majority vote of the total membership of the oversight board is required for the oversight board to take action. The oversight board shall be deemed to be a local entity for purposes of the Ralph M. Brown Act, the California Public Records Act, and the Political Reform Act of 1974. All actions taken by the oversight board shall be adopted by resolution.
(f)All notices required by law for proposed oversight board actions shall also be posted on the successor agencys Internet Web site or the oversight boards Internet Web site.
(g)Each member of an oversight board shall serve at the pleasure of the entity that appointed such member.
(h)The Department of Finance may review an oversight board action taken pursuant to this part. Written notice and information about all actions taken by an oversight board shall be provided to the department by electronic means and in a manner of the departments choosing. An action shall become effective five business days after notice in the manner specified by the department is provided unless the department requests a review. Each oversight board shall designate an official to whom the department may make those requests and who shall provide the department with the telephone number and email contact information for the purpose of communicating with the department pursuant to this subdivision. Except as otherwise provided in this part, in the event that the department requests a review of a given oversight board action, it shall have 40 days from the date of its request to approve the oversight board action or return it to the oversight board for reconsideration and the oversight board action shall not be effective until approved by the department. In the event that the department returns the oversight board action to the oversight board for reconsideration, the oversight board shall resubmit the modified action for department approval and the modified oversight board action shall not become effective until approved by the department. If the department reviews a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule, the department may eliminate or modify any item on that schedule prior to its approval. The county auditor-controller shall reflect the actions of the department in determining the amount of property tax revenues to allocate to the successor agency. The department shall provide notice to the successor agency and the county auditor-controller as to the reasons for its actions. To the extent that an oversight board continues to dispute a determination with the department, one or more future recognized obligation schedules may reflect any resolution of that dispute. The department may also agree to an amendment to a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule to reflect a resolution of a disputed item; however, this shall not affect a past allocation of property tax or create a liability for any affected taxing entity.
(i)Oversight boards shall have fiduciary responsibilities to holders of enforceable obligations and the taxing entities that benefit from distributions of property tax and other revenues pursuant to Section 34188. Further, the provisions of Division 4 (commencing with Section 1000) of the Government Code shall apply to oversight boards. Notwithstanding Section 1099 of the Government Code, or any other law, any individual may simultaneously be appointed to up to five oversight boards and may hold an office in a city, county, city and county, special district, school district, or community college district.
(j)Commencing on and after July 1, 2016, in each county where more than one oversight board was created by operation of the act adding this part, there shall be only one oversight board appointed as follows:
(1)One member may be appointed by the county board of supervisors.
(2)One member may be appointed by the city selection committee established pursuant to Section 50270 of the Government Code. In a city and county, the mayor may appoint one member.
(3)One member may be appointed by the independent special district selection committee established pursuant to Section 56332 of the Government Code, for the types of special districts that are eligible to receive property tax revenues pursuant to Section 34188.
(4)One member may be appointed by the county superintendent of education to represent schools if the superintendent is elected. If the county superintendent of education is appointed, then the appointment made pursuant to this paragraph shall be made by the county board of education.
(5)One member may be appointed by the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges to represent community college districts in the county.
(6)One member of the public may be appointed by the county board of supervisors.
(7)One member may be appointed by the recognized employee organization representing the largest number of successor agency employees in the county.
(k)The Governor may appoint individuals to fill any oversight board member position described in subdivision (j) that has not been filled by July 15, 2016, or any member position that remains vacant for more than 60 days.
(l)Commencing on and after July 1, 2016, in each county where only one oversight board was created by operation of the act adding this part, then there will be no change to the composition of that oversight board as a result of the operation of subdivision (b).
(m)Any oversight board for a given successor agency shall cease to exist when all of the indebtedness of the dissolved redevelopment agency has been repaid.
(n)An oversight board may direct a successor agency to provide additional legal or financial advice than what was given by agency staff.
(o)An oversight board is authorized to contract with the county or other public or private agencies for administrative support.
(p)On matters within the purview of the oversight board, decisions made by the oversight board supersede those made by the successor agency or the staff of the successor agency.
SEC. 2.Section 34191.4 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:34191.4.The following provisions shall apply to any successor agency that has been issued a finding of completion by the Department of Finance:
(a)All real property and interests in real property identified in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (5) of subdivision (c) of Section 34179.5 shall be transferred to the Community Redevelopment Property Trust Fund of the successor agency upon approval by the Department of Finance of the long-range property management plan submitted by the successor agency pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 34191.5 unless that property is subject to the requirements of any existing enforceable obligation.
(b)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (d) of Section 34171, upon application by the successor agency and approval by the oversight board, loan agreements entered into between the redevelopment agency and the city, county, or city and county that created the redevelopment agency shall be deemed to be enforceable obligations provided that the oversight board makes a finding that the loan was for legitimate redevelopment purposes.
(2)If the oversight board finds that the loan is an enforceable obligation, the accumulated interest on the remaining principal amount of the loan shall be recalculated from origination at the interest rate earned by funds deposited into the Local Agency Investment Fund. The loan shall be repaid to the city, county, or city and county in accordance with a defined schedule over a reasonable term of years at an interest rate not to exceed the interest rate earned by funds deposited into the Local Agency Investment Fund. The annual loan repayments provided for in the recognized obligation payment schedules shall be subject to all of the following limitations:
(A)Loan repayments shall not be made prior to the 201314 fiscal year. Beginning in the 201314 fiscal year, the maximum repayment amount authorized each fiscal year for repayments made pursuant to this subdivision and paragraph (7) of subdivision (e) of Section 34176 combined shall be equal to one-half of the increase between the amount distributed to the taxing entities pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 in that fiscal year and the amount distributed to taxing entities pursuant to that paragraph in the 201213 base year, provided, however, that calculation of the amount distributed to taxing entities during the 201213 base year shall not include any amounts distributed to taxing entities pursuant to the due diligence review process established in Sections 34179.5 to 34179.8, inclusive. Loan or deferral repayments made pursuant to this subdivision shall be second in priority to amounts to be repaid pursuant to paragraph (7) of subdivision (e) of Section 34176.
(B)Repayments received by the city, county, or city and county that formed the redevelopment agency shall first be used to retire any outstanding amounts borrowed and owed to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund of the former redevelopment agency for purposes of the Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund and shall be distributed to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund established by subdivision (d) of Section 34176.
(C)Twenty percent of any loan repayment shall be deducted from the loan repayment amount and shall be transferred to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund, after all outstanding loans from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund for purposes of the Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund have been paid.
(c)(1)Bond proceeds derived from bonds issued on or before December 31, 2010, shall be used for the purposes for which the bonds were sold.
(2)(A)Notwithstanding Section 34177.3 or any other conflicting provision of law, bond proceeds in excess of the amounts needed to satisfy approved enforceable obligations shall thereafter be expended in a manner consistent with the original bond covenants. Enforceable obligations may be satisfied by the creation of reserves for projects that are the subject of the enforceable obligation and that are consistent with the contractual obligations for those projects, or by expending funds to complete the projects. An expenditure made pursuant to this paragraph shall constitute the creation of excess bond proceeds obligations to be paid from the excess proceeds. Excess bond proceeds obligations shall be listed separately on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule submitted by the successor agency.
(B)If remaining bond proceeds cannot be spent in a manner consistent with the bond covenants pursuant to subparagraph (A), the proceeds shall be used to defease the bonds or to purchase those same outstanding bonds on the open market for cancellation.
(d)Notwithstanding subdivision (b) of Section 34163, if a successor agency has received a finding of completion, with the approval of the successor agencys oversight board, the successor agency may amend or modify existing contracts and agreements, or otherwise administer projects in connection with enforceable obligations approved pursuant to subdivision (m) of Section 34177, including the substitution of private developer capital in a disposition and development agreement that has been deemed an enforceable obligation, if the contract, agreement, or project will not commit new property tax funds, and will not otherwise directly or indirectly reduce property tax revenues or payments made pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 to the taxing agencies.
SEC. 3.Section 34191.5 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:34191.5.(a)There is hereby established a Community Redevelopment Property Trust Fund, administered by the successor agency, to serve as the repository of the former redevelopment agencys real properties identified in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (5) of subdivision (c) of Section 34179.5.
(b)The successor agency shall prepare a long-range property management plan that addresses the disposition and use of the real properties of the former redevelopment agency. The report shall be submitted to the oversight board and the Department of Finance for approval no later than six months following the issuance to the successor agency of the finding of completion.
(c)The long-range property management plan shall do all of the following:
(1)Include an inventory of all properties in the trust. The inventory shall consist of all of the following information:
(A)The date of the acquisition of the property and the value of the property at that time, and an estimate of the current value of the property.
(B)The purpose for which the property was acquired.
(C)Parcel data, including address, lot size, and current zoning in the former agency redevelopment plan or specific, community, or general plan.
(D)An estimate of the current value of the parcel including, if available, any appraisal information.
(E)An estimate of any lease, rental, or any other revenues generated by the property, and a description of the contractual requirements for the disposition of those funds.
(F)The history of environmental contamination, including designation as a brownfield site, any related environmental studies, and history of any remediation efforts.
(G)A description of the propertys potential for transit-oriented development and the advancement of the planning objectives of the successor agency.
(H)A brief history of previous development proposals and activity, including the rental or lease of property.
(2)Address the use or disposition of all of the properties in the trust. Permissible uses include the retention of the property for governmental use pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 34181, the retention of the property for future development, the sale of the property, or the use of the property to fulfill an enforceable obligation. The plan shall separately identify and list properties in the trust dedicated to governmental use purposes and properties retained for purposes of fulfilling an enforceable obligation. With respect to the use or disposition of all other properties, all of the following shall apply:
(A)(i)If the plan directs the use or liquidation of the property for a project identified in an approved redevelopment plan, the property shall transfer to the city, county, or city and county.
(ii)For purposes of this subparagraph, the term identified in an approved redevelopment plan includes properties listed in a community plan or a five-year implementation plan.
(iii)The department or an oversight board may require approval of a compensation agreement or agreements, as described in subdivision (f) of Section 34180, prior to any transfer of property pursuant to this subparagraph, provided, however, that a compensation agreement or agreements may be developed and executed subsequent to the approval process of a long-range property management plan.
(B)If the plan directs the liquidation of the property or the use of revenues generated from the property, such as lease or parking revenues, for any purpose other than to fulfill an enforceable obligation or other than that specified in subparagraph (A), the proceeds from the sale shall be distributed as property tax to the taxing entities.
(C)Property shall not be transferred to a successor agency, city, county, or city and county, unless the long-range property management plan has been approved by the oversight board and the Department of Finance.
(d)The department shall only consider whether the long-range property management plan makes a good faith effort to address the requirements set forth in subdivision (c).
(e)The department shall approve long-range property management plans as expeditiously as possible.
(f)Actions relating to the disposition of property after approval of a long-range property management plan shall not require review by the department.
The following terms shall have the following meanings:
(a)Administrative budget means the budget for administrative costs of the successor agencies as provided in Section 34177.
(b)Administrative cost allowance means an amount that, subject to the approval of the oversight board, is payable from property tax revenues of up to 5 percent of the property tax allocated to the successor agency on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule covering the period January 1, 2012, through June 30, 2012, and up to 3 percent of the property tax allocated to the Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund money that is allocated to the successor agency for each fiscal year thereafter; provided, however, that the amount shall not be less than two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000), unless the oversight board reduces this amount, for any fiscal year or such lesser amount as agreed to by the successor agency. However, the allowance amount shall exclude, and shall not apply to, any administrative costs that can be paid from bond proceeds or from sources other than property tax. Administrative cost allowances shall exclude any litigation expenses related to assets or obligations, settlements and judgments, and the costs of maintaining assets prior to disposition. Employee costs associated with work on specific project implementation activities, including, but not limited to, construction inspection, project management, or actual construction, shall be considered project-specific costs and shall not constitute administrative costs.
(c)Designated local authority shall mean a public entity formed pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 34173.
(d)(1)Enforceable obligation means any of the following:
(A)Bonds, as defined by Section 33602 and bonds issued pursuant to Chapter 10.5 (commencing with Section 5850) of Division 6 of Title 1 of the Government Code, including the required debt service, reserve set-asides, and any other payments required under the indenture or similar documents governing the issuance of the outstanding bonds of the former redevelopment agency. A reserve may be held when required by the bond indenture or when the next property tax allocation will be insufficient to pay all obligations due under the provisions of the bond for the next payment due in the following half of the calendar year.
(B)Loans of moneys borrowed by the redevelopment agency for a lawful purpose, to the extent they are legally required to be repaid pursuant to a required repayment schedule or other mandatory loan terms.
(C)Payments required by the federal government, preexisting obligations to the state or obligations imposed by state law, other than passthrough payments that are made by the county auditor-controller pursuant to Section 34183, or legally enforceable payments required in connection with the agencies employees, including, but not limited to, pension payments, pension obligation debt service, unemployment payments, or other obligations conferred through a collective bargaining agreement. Costs incurred to fulfill collective bargaining agreements for layoffs or terminations of city employees who performed work directly on behalf of the former redevelopment agency shall be considered enforceable obligations payable from property tax funds. The obligations to employees specified in this subparagraph shall remain enforceable obligations payable from property tax funds for any employee to whom those obligations apply if that employee is transferred to the entity assuming the housing functions of the former redevelopment agency pursuant to Section 34176. The successor agency or designated local authority shall enter into an agreement with the housing entity to reimburse it for any costs of the employee obligations.
(D)Judgments or settlements entered by a competent court of law or binding arbitration decisions against the former redevelopment agency, other than passthrough payments that are made by the county auditor-controller pursuant to Section 34183. Along with the successor agency, the oversight board shall have the authority and standing to appeal any judgment or to set aside any settlement or arbitration decision.
(E)Any legally binding and enforceable agreement or contract that is not otherwise void as violating the debt limit or public policy. However, nothing in this act shall prohibit either the successor agency, with the approval or at the direction of the oversight board, or the oversight board itself from terminating any existing agreements or contracts and providing any necessary and required compensation or remediation for such termination. Titles of or headings used on or in a document shall not be relevant in determining the existence of an enforceable obligation.
(F)Contracts or agreements necessary for the administration or operation of the successor agency, in accordance with this part, including, but not limited to, agreements concerning litigation expenses related to assets or obligations, settlements and judgments, and the costs of maintaining assets prior to disposition, and agreements to purchase or rent office space, equipment and supplies, and pay-related expenses pursuant to Section 33127 and for carrying insurance pursuant to Section 33134.
(G)Amounts borrowed from, or payments owing to, the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund of a redevelopment agency, which had been deferred as of the effective date of the act adding this part; provided, however, that the repayment schedule is approved by the oversight board. Repayments shall be transferred to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund established pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 34176 as a housing asset and shall be used in a manner consistent with the affordable housing requirements of the Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000)).
(2)For purposes of this part, enforceable obligation does not include any agreements, contracts, or arrangements between the city, county, or city and county that created the redevelopment agency and the former redevelopment agency. However, written agreements entered into (A) at the time of issuance, but in no event later than December 31, 2010, of indebtedness obligations, and (B) solely for the purpose of securing or repaying those indebtedness obligations, may be deemed enforceable obligations for purposes of this part. Notwithstanding this paragraph, loan agreements entered into between the redevelopment agency and the city, county, or city and county that created it, within two years of the date of creation of the redevelopment agency, may be deemed to be enforceable obligations. Notwithstanding this paragraph, an agreement entered into by the redevelopment agency prior to June 30, 2011, is an enforceable obligation if the agreement relates to state highway infrastructure improvements to which the redevelopment agency committed funds pursuant to Section 33445.
(3)Contracts or agreements between the former redevelopment agency and other public agencies, to perform services or provide funding for governmental or private services or capital projects outside of redevelopment project areas that do not provide benefit to the redevelopment project and thus were not properly authorized under Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000) shall be deemed void on the effective date of this part; provided, however, that such contracts or agreements for the provision of housing properly authorized under Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000) shall not be deemed void.
(e)Indebtedness obligations means bonds, notes, certificates of participation, or other evidence of indebtedness, issued or delivered by the redevelopment agency, or by a joint exercise of powers authority created by the redevelopment agency, to third-party investors or bondholders to finance or refinance redevelopment projects undertaken by the redevelopment agency in compliance with the Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000)).
(f)Oversight board shall mean each entity established pursuant to Section 34179.
(g)Recognized obligation means an obligation listed in the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule.
(h)Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule means the document setting forth the minimum payment amounts and due dates of payments required by enforceable obligations for each six-month fiscal period as provided in subdivision (m) of Section 34177.
(i)School entity means any entity defined as such in subdivision (f) of Section 95 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(j)Successor agency means the successor entity to the former redevelopment agency as described in Section 34173.
(k)Taxing entities means cities, counties, a city and county, special districts, and school entities, as defined in subdivision (f) of Section 95 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, that receive passthrough payments and distributions of property taxes pursuant to the provisions of this part.
(l)Property taxes include all property tax revenues, including those from unitary and supplemental and roll corrections applicable to tax increment.
(m)Department means the Department of Finance unless the context clearly refers to another state agency.
(n)Sponsoring entity means the city, county, or city and county, or other entity that authorized the creation of each redevelopment agency.
(o)Final judicial determination means a final judicial determination made by any state court that is not appealed, or by a court of appellate jurisdiction that is not further appealed, in an action by any party.
(p)From July 1, 2014, to July 1, 2018, inclusive, housing entity administrative cost allowance means an amount of up to 1 percent of the property tax allocated to the Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund on behalf of the successor agency for each applicable fiscal year, but not less than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) per fiscal year.
(1)If a local housing authority assumed the housing functions of the former redevelopment agency pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 34176, then the housing entity administrative cost allowance shall be listed by the successor agency on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule. Upon approval of the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule by the oversight board and the department, the housing entity administrative cost allowance shall be remitted by the successor agency on each January 2 and July 1 to the local housing authority that assumed the housing functions of the former redevelopment agency pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 34176.
(2)If there are insufficient moneys in the Redevelopment Obligations Retirement Fund in a given fiscal year to make the payment authorized by this subdivision, the unfunded amount may be listed on each subsequent Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule until it has been paid in full. In these cases the five-year time limit on the payments shall not apply.
SEC. 2. SECTION 1.Section 34179 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:34179.(a)Each successor agency shall have an oversight board composed of seven members. The members shall elect one of their members as the chairperson and shall report the name of the chairperson and other members to the Department of Finance on or before May 1, 2012. Members shall be selected as follows:
(1)One member appointed by the county board of supervisors.
(2)One member appointed by the mayor for the city that formed the redevelopment agency.
(3)(A)One member appointed by the largest special district, by property tax share, with territory in the territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency, which is of the type of special district that is eligible to receive property tax revenues pursuant to Section 34188.
(B)On or after the effective date of this subparagraph, the county auditor-controller may determine which is the largest special district for purposes of this section.
(4)One member appointed by the county superintendent of education to represent schools if the superintendent is elected. If the county superintendent of education is appointed, then the appointment made pursuant to this paragraph shall be made by the county board of education.
(5)One member appointed by the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges to represent community college districts in the county.
(6)One member of the public appointed by the county board of supervisors.
(7)One member representing the employees of the former redevelopment agency appointed by the mayor or chair of the board of supervisors, as the case may be, from the recognized employee organization representing the largest number of former redevelopment agency employees employed by the successor agency at that time. In the case where city or county employees performed administrative duties of the former redevelopment agency, the appointment shall be made from the recognized employee organization representing those employees. If a recognized employee organization does not exist for either the employees of the former redevelopment agency or the city or county employees performing administrative duties of the former redevelopment agency, the appointment shall be made from among the employees of the successor agency. In voting to approve a contract as an enforceable obligation, a member appointed pursuant to this paragraph shall not be deemed to be interested in the contract by virtue of being an employee of the successor agency or community for purposes of Section 1090 of the Government Code.
(8)If the county or a joint powers agency formed the redevelopment agency, then the largest city by acreage in the territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency may select one member. If there are no cities with territory in a project area of the redevelopment agency, the county superintendent of education may appoint an additional member to represent the public.
(9)If there are no special districts of the type that are eligible to receive property tax pursuant to Section 34188, within the territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency, then the county may appoint one member to represent the public.
(10)If a redevelopment agency was formed by an entity that is both a charter city and a county, the oversight board shall be composed of seven members selected as follows: three members appointed by the mayor of the city, if that appointment is subject to confirmation by the county board of supervisors, one member appointed by the largest special district, by property tax share, with territory in the territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency, which is the type of special district that is eligible to receive property tax revenues pursuant to Section 34188, one member appointed by the county superintendent of education to represent schools, one member appointed by the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges to represent community college districts, and one member representing employees of the former redevelopment agency appointed by the mayor of the city if that appointment is subject to confirmation by the county board of supervisors, to represent the largest number of former redevelopment agency employees employed by the successor agency at that time.
(11)Each appointing authority identified in this subdivision may, but is not required to, appoint alternate representatives to serve on the oversight board as may be necessary to attend any meeting of the oversight board in the event that the appointing authoritys primary representative is unable to attend any meeting for any reason. If an alternate representative attends any meeting in place of the primary representative, the alternative alternate representative shall have the same participatory and voting rights as all other attending members of the oversight board. The successor agency shall promptly notify the department regarding the appointment of alternate representatives to the oversight board.
(b)The Governor may appoint individuals to fill any oversight board member position described in subdivision (a) that has not been filled by May 15, 2012, or any member position that remains vacant for more than 60 days.
(c)The oversight board may direct the staff of the successor agency to perform work in furtherance of the oversight boards duties and responsibilities under this part. The successor agency shall pay for all of the costs of meetings of the oversight board and may include such costs in its administrative budget. Oversight board members shall serve without compensation or reimbursement for expenses.
(d)Oversight board members are protected by the immunities applicable to public entities and public employees governed by Part 1 (commencing with Section 810) and Part 2 (commencing with Section 814) of Division 3.6 of Title 1 of the Government Code.
(e)A majority of the total membership of the oversight board shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. A majority vote of the total membership of the oversight board is required for the oversight board to take action. The oversight board shall be deemed to be a local entity for purposes of the Ralph M. Brown Act, the California Public Records Act, and the Political Reform Act of 1974. All actions taken by the oversight board shall be adopted by resolution.
(f)All notices required by law for proposed oversight board actions shall also be posted on the successor agencys Internet Web site or the oversight boards Internet Web site.
(g)Each member of an oversight board shall serve at the pleasure of the entity that appointed such member.
(h)The Department of Finance may review an oversight board action taken pursuant to this part. Written notice and information about all actions taken by an oversight board shall be provided to the department by electronic means and in a manner of the departments choosing. An action shall become effective five business days after notice in the manner specified by the department is provided unless the department requests a review. Each oversight board shall designate an official to whom the department may make those requests and who shall provide the department with the telephone number and email contact information for the purpose of communicating with the department pursuant to this subdivision. Except as otherwise provided in this part, in the event that the department requests a review of a given oversight board action, it shall have 40 days from the date of its request to approve the oversight board action or return it to the oversight board for reconsideration and the oversight board action shall not be effective until approved by the department. In the event that the department returns the oversight board action to the oversight board for reconsideration, the oversight board shall resubmit the modified action for department approval and the modified oversight board action shall not become effective until approved by the department. If the department reviews a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule, the department may eliminate or modify any item on that schedule prior to its approval. The county auditor-controller shall reflect the actions of the department in determining the amount of property tax revenues to allocate to the successor agency. The department shall provide notice to the successor agency and the county auditor-controller as to the reasons for its actions. To the extent that an oversight board continues to dispute a determination with the department, one or more future recognized obligation schedules may reflect any resolution of that dispute. The department may also agree to an amendment to a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule to reflect a resolution of a disputed item; however, this shall not affect a past allocation of property tax or create a liability for any affected taxing entity.
(i)Oversight boards shall have fiduciary responsibilities to holders of enforceable obligations and the taxing entities that benefit from distributions of property tax and other revenues pursuant to Section 34188. Further, the provisions of Division 4 (commencing with Section 1000) of the Government Code shall apply to oversight boards. Notwithstanding Section 1099 of the Government Code, or any other law, any individual may simultaneously be appointed to up to five oversight boards and may hold an office in a city, county, city and county, special district, school district, or community college district.
(j)Commencing on and after July 1, 2016, in each county where more than one oversight board was created by operation of the act adding this part, there shall be only one oversight board appointed as follows:
(1)One member may be appointed by the county board of supervisors.
(2)One member may be appointed by the city selection committee established pursuant to Section 50270 of the Government Code. In a city and county, the mayor may appoint one member.
(3)One member may be appointed by the independent special district selection committee established pursuant to Section 56332 of the Government Code, for the types of special districts that are eligible to receive property tax revenues pursuant to Section 34188.
(4)One member may be appointed by the county superintendent of education to represent schools if the superintendent is elected. If the county superintendent of education is appointed, then the appointment made pursuant to this paragraph shall be made by the county board of education.
(5)One member may be appointed by the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges to represent community college districts in the county.
(6)One member of the public may be appointed by the county board of supervisors.
(7)One member may be appointed by the recognized employee organization representing the largest number of successor agency employees in the county.
(k)The Governor may appoint individuals to fill any oversight board member position described in subdivision (j) that has not been filled by July 15, 2016, or any member position that remains vacant for more than 60 days.
(l)Commencing on and after July 1, 2016, in each county where only one oversight board was created by operation of the act adding this part, then there will be no change to the composition of that oversight board as a result of the operation of subdivision (b).
(m)Any oversight board for a given successor agency shall cease to exist when all of the indebtedness of the dissolved redevelopment agency has been repaid.
(n)An oversight board may direct a successor agency to provide additional legal or financial advice than what was given by agency staff.
(o)An oversight board is authorized to contract with the county or other public or private agencies for administrative support.
(p)On matters within the purview of the oversight board, decisions made by the oversight board supersede those made by the successor agency or the staff of the successor agency.
SEC. 3.SEC. 2.Section 34191.4 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:34191.4.The following provisions shall apply to any successor agency that has been issued a finding of completion by the Department of Finance:
(a)All real property and interests in real property identified in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (5) of subdivision (c) of Section 34179.5 shall be transferred to the Community Redevelopment Property Trust Fund of the successor agency upon approval by the Department of Finance of the long-range property management plan submitted by the successor agency pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 34191.5 unless that property is subject to the requirements of any existing enforceable obligation.
(b)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (d) of Section 34171, upon application by the successor agency and approval by the oversight board, loan agreements entered into between the redevelopment agency and the city, county, or city and county that created the redevelopment agency shall be deemed to be enforceable obligations provided that the oversight board makes a finding that the loan was for legitimate redevelopment purposes.
(2)If the oversight board finds that the loan is an enforceable obligation, the accumulated interest on the remaining principal amount of the loan shall be recalculated from origination at the interest rate earned by funds deposited into the Local Agency Investment Fund. The loan shall be repaid to the city, county, or city and county in accordance with a defined schedule over a reasonable term of years at an interest rate not to exceed the interest rate earned by funds deposited into the Local Agency Investment Fund. The annual loan repayments provided for in the recognized obligation payment schedules shall be subject to all of the following limitations:
(A)Loan repayments shall not be made prior to the 201314 fiscal year. Beginning in the 201314 fiscal year, the maximum repayment amount authorized each fiscal year for repayments made pursuant to this subdivision and paragraph (7) of subdivision (e) of Section 34176 combined shall be equal to one-half of the increase between the amount distributed to the taxing entities pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 in that fiscal year and the amount distributed to taxing entities pursuant to that paragraph in the 201213 base year, provided, however, that calculation of the amount distributed to taxing entities during the 201213 base year shall not include any amounts distributed to taxing entities pursuant to the due diligence review process established in Sections 34179.5 to 34179.8, inclusive. Loan or deferral repayments made pursuant to this subdivision shall be second in priority to amounts to be repaid pursuant to paragraph (7) of subdivision (e) of Section 34176.
(B)Repayments received by the city, county, or city and county that formed the redevelopment agency shall first be used to retire any outstanding amounts borrowed and owed to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund of the former redevelopment agency for purposes of the Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund and shall be distributed to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund established by subdivision (d) of Section 34176.
(C)Twenty percent of any loan repayment shall be deducted from the loan repayment amount and shall be transferred to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund, after all outstanding loans from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund for purposes of the Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund have been paid.
(c)(1)Bond proceeds derived from bonds issued on or before December 31, 2010, shall be used for the purposes for which the bonds were sold.
(2)(A)Notwithstanding Section 34177.3 or any other conflicting provision of law, bond proceeds in excess of the amounts needed to satisfy approved enforceable obligations shall thereafter be expended in a manner consistent with the original bond covenants. Enforceable obligations may be satisfied by the creation of reserves for projects that are the subject of the enforceable obligation and that are consistent with the contractual obligations for those projects, or by expending funds to complete the projects. An expenditure made pursuant to this paragraph shall constitute the creation of excess bond proceeds obligations to be paid from the excess proceeds. Excess bond proceeds obligations shall be listed separately on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule submitted by the successor agency.
(B)If remaining bond proceeds cannot be spent in a manner consistent with the bond covenants pursuant to subparagraph (A), the proceeds shall be used to defease the bonds or to purchase those same outstanding bonds on the open market for cancellation.
(d)Notwithstanding subdivision (b) of Section 34163, if a successor agency has received a finding of completion, with the approval of the successor agencys oversight board, the successor agency may amend or modify existing, existing contracts and agreements, or otherwise administer projects in connection with enforceable obligations approved pursuant to subdivision (m) of Section 34177, including the substitution of private developer capital in a disposition and development agreement that has been deemed an enforceable obligation, if the contract, agreement, or project will not commit new property tax funds, and will not otherwise directly or indirectly reduce property tax revenues or payments made pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 to the taxing agencies.
SEC. 4.SEC. 3.Section 34191.5 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:34191.5.(a)There is hereby established a Community Redevelopment Property Trust Fund, administered by the successor agency, to serve as the repository of the former redevelopment agencys real properties identified in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (5) of subdivision (c) of Section 34179.5.
(b)The successor agency shall prepare a long-range property management plan that addresses the disposition and use of the real properties of the former redevelopment agency. The report shall be submitted to the oversight board and the Department of Finance for approval no later than six months following the issuance to the successor agency of the finding of completion.
(c)The long-range property management plan shall do all of the following:
(1)Include an inventory of all properties in the trust. The inventory shall consist of all of the following information:
(A)The date of the acquisition of the property and the value of the property at that time, and an estimate of the current value of the property.
(B)The purpose for which the property was acquired.
(C)Parcel data, including address, lot size, and current zoning in the former agency redevelopment plan or specific, community, or general plan.
(D)An estimate of the current value of the parcel including, if available, any appraisal information.
(E)An estimate of any lease, rental, or any other revenues generated by the property, and a description of the contractual requirements for the disposition of those funds.
(F)The history of environmental contamination, including designation as a brownfield site, any related environmental studies, and history of any remediation efforts.
(G)A description of the propertys potential for transit-oriented development and the advancement of the planning objectives of the successor agency.
(H)A brief history of previous development proposals and activity, including the rental or lease of property.
(2)Address the use or disposition of all of the properties in the trust. Permissible uses include the retention of the property for governmental use pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 34181, the retention of the property for future development, the sale of the property, or the use of the property to fulfill an enforceable obligation. The plan shall separately identify and list properties in the trust dedicated to governmental use purposes and properties retained for purposes of fulfilling an enforceable obligation. With respect to the use or disposition of all other properties, all of the following shall apply:
(A)(i)If the plan directs the use or liquidation of the property for a project identified in an approved redevelopment plan, the property shall transfer to the city, county, or city and county.
(ii)For purposes of this subparagraph, the term identified in an approved redevelopment plan includes properties listed in a community plan or a five-year implementation plan.
(iii)The department or an oversight board may require approval of a compensation agreement or agreements, as described in subdivision (f) of Section 34180, prior to any transfer of property pursuant to this subparagraph, provided, however, that a compensation agreement or agreements may be developed and executed subsequent to the approval process of a long-range property management plan.
(B)If the plan directs the liquidation of the property or the use of revenues generated from the property, such as lease or parking revenues, for any purpose other than to fulfill an enforceable obligation or other than that specified in subparagraph (A), the proceeds from the sale shall be distributed as property tax to the taxing entities.
(C)Property shall not be transferred to a successor agency, city, county, or city and county, unless the long-range property management plan has been approved by the oversight board and the Department of Finance.
(d)The department shall only consider whether the long-range property management plan makes a good faith effort to address the requirements set forth in subdivision (c).
(e)The department shall approve long-range property management plans as expeditiously as possible.
(f)Actions relating to the disposition of property after approval of a long-range property management plan shall not require review by the department.
The following terms shall have the following meanings:
(a)Administrative budget means the budget for administrative costs of the successor agencies as provided in Section 34177.
(b)Administrative cost allowance means an amount that, subject to the approval of the oversight board, is payable from property tax revenues of up to 5 percent of the property tax allocated to the successor agency on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule covering the period January 1, 2012, through June 30, 2012, and up to 3 percent of the property tax allocated to the Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund money that is allocated to the successor agency for each fiscal year thereafter; provided, however, that the amount shall not be less than two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000), unless the oversight board reduces this amount, for any fiscal year or such lesser amount as agreed to by the successor agency. However, the allowance amount shall exclude, and shall not apply to, any administrative costs that can be paid from bond proceeds or from sources other than property tax. Administrative cost allowances shall exclude any litigation expenses related to assets or obligations, settlements and judgments, and the costs of maintaining assets prior to disposition. Employee costs associated with work on specific project implementation activities, including, but not limited to, construction inspection, project management, or actual construction, shall be considered project-specific costs and shall not constitute administrative costs.
(c)Designated local authority shall mean a public entity formed pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 34173.
(d)(1)Enforceable obligation means any of the following:
(A)Bonds, as defined by Section 33602 and bonds issued pursuant to Chapter 10.5 (commencing with Section 5850) of Division 6 of Title 1 of the Government Code, including the required debt service, reserve set-asides, and any other payments required under the indenture or similar documents governing the issuance of the outstanding bonds of the former redevelopment agency. A reserve may be held when required by the bond indenture or when the next property tax allocation will be insufficient to pay all obligations due under the provisions of the bond for the next payment due in the following half of the calendar year.
(B)Loans of moneys borrowed by the redevelopment agency for a lawful purpose, to the extent they are legally required to be repaid pursuant to a required repayment schedule or other mandatory loan terms.
(C)Payments required by the federal government, preexisting obligations to the state or obligations imposed by state law, other than passthrough payments that are made by the county auditor-controller pursuant to Section 34183, or legally enforceable payments required in connection with the agencies employees, including, but not limited to, pension payments, pension obligation debt service, unemployment payments, or other obligations conferred through a collective bargaining agreement. Costs incurred to fulfill collective bargaining agreements for layoffs or terminations of city employees who performed work directly on behalf of the former redevelopment agency shall be considered enforceable obligations payable from property tax funds. The obligations to employees specified in this subparagraph shall remain enforceable obligations payable from property tax funds for any employee to whom those obligations apply if that employee is transferred to the entity assuming the housing functions of the former redevelopment agency pursuant to Section 34176. The successor agency or designated local authority shall enter into an agreement with the housing entity to reimburse it for any costs of the employee obligations.
(D)Judgments or settlements entered by a competent court of law or binding arbitration decisions against the former redevelopment agency, other than passthrough payments that are made by the county auditor-controller pursuant to Section 34183. Along with the successor agency, the oversight board shall have the authority and standing to appeal any judgment or to set aside any settlement or arbitration decision.
(E)Any legally binding and enforceable agreement or contract that is not otherwise void as violating the debt limit or public policy. However, nothing in this act shall prohibit either the successor agency, with the approval or at the direction of the oversight board, or the oversight board itself from terminating any existing agreements or contracts and providing any necessary and required compensation or remediation for such termination. Titles of or headings used on or in a document shall not be relevant in determining the existence of an enforceable obligation.
(F)Contracts or agreements necessary for the administration or operation of the successor agency, in accordance with this part, including, but not limited to, agreements concerning litigation expenses related to assets or obligations, settlements and judgments, and the costs of maintaining assets prior to disposition, and agreements to purchase or rent office space, equipment and supplies, and pay-related expenses pursuant to Section 33127 and for carrying insurance pursuant to Section 33134.
(G)Amounts borrowed from, or payments owing to, the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund of a redevelopment agency, which had been deferred as of the effective date of the act adding this part; provided, however, that the repayment schedule is approved by the oversight board. Repayments shall be transferred to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund established pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 34176 as a housing asset and shall be used in a manner consistent with the affordable housing requirements of the Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000)).
(2)For purposes of this part, enforceable obligation does not include any agreements, contracts, or arrangements between the city, county, or city and county that created the redevelopment agency and the former redevelopment agency. However, written agreements entered into (A) at the time of issuance, but in no event later than December 31, 2010, of indebtedness obligations, and (B) solely for the purpose of securing or repaying those indebtedness obligations obligations, may be deemed enforceable obligations for purposes of this part. Notwithstanding this paragraph, loan agreements entered into between the redevelopment agency and the city, county, or city and county that created it, within two years of the date of creation of the redevelopment agency, may be deemed to be enforceable obligations. Notwithstanding this paragraph, an agreement entered into by the redevelopment agency prior to June 30, 2011, is an enforceable obligation if the agreement relates to state highway infrastructure improvements to which the redevelopment agency committed funds pursuant to Section 33445.
(3)Contracts or agreements between the former redevelopment agency and other public agencies, to perform services or provide funding for governmental or private services or capital projects outside of redevelopment project areas that do not provide benefit to the redevelopment project and thus were not properly authorized under Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000) shall be deemed void on the effective date of this part; provided, however, that such contracts or agreements for the provision of housing properly authorized under Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000) shall not be deemed void.
(e)Indebtedness obligations means bonds, notes, certificates of participation, or other evidence of indebtedness, issued or delivered by the redevelopment agency, or by a joint exercise of powers authority created by the redevelopment agency, to third-party investors or bondholders to finance or refinance redevelopment projects undertaken by the redevelopment agency in compliance with the Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000)).
(f)Oversight board shall mean each entity established pursuant to Section 34179.
(g)Recognized obligation means an obligation listed in the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule.
(h)Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule means the document setting forth the minimum payment amounts and due dates of payments required by enforceable obligations for each six-month fiscal period as provided in subdivision (m) of Section 34177.
(i)School entity means any entity defined as such in subdivision (f) of Section 95 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(j)Successor agency means the successor entity to the former redevelopment agency as described in Section 34173.
(k)Taxing entities means cities, counties, a city and county, special districts, and school entities, as defined in subdivision (f) of Section 95 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, that receive passthrough payments and distributions of property taxes pursuant to the provisions of this part.
(l)Property taxes include all property tax revenues, including those from unitary and supplemental and roll corrections applicable to tax increment.
(m)Department means the Department of Finance unless the context clearly refers to another state agency.
(n)Sponsoring entity means the city, county, or city and county, or other entity that authorized the creation of each redevelopment agency.
(o)Final judicial determination means a final judicial determination made by any state court that is not appealed, or by a court of appellate jurisdiction that is not further appealed, in an action by any party.
(p)From July 1, 2014, to July 1, 2018, inclusive, housing entity administrative cost allowance means an amount of up to 1 percent of the property tax allocated to the Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund on behalf of the successor agency for each applicable fiscal year, but not less than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) per fiscal year.
(1)If a local housing authority assumed the housing functions of the former redevelopment agency pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 34176, then the housing entity administrative cost allowance shall be listed by the successor agency on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule. Upon approval of the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule by the oversight board and the department, the housing entity administrative cost allowance shall be remitted by the successor agency on each January 2 and July 1 to the local housing authority that assumed the housing functions of the former redevelopment agency pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 34176.
(2)If there are insufficient moneys in the Redevelopment Obligations Retirement Fund in a given fiscal year to make the payment authorized by this subdivision, the unfunded amount may be listed on each subsequent Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule until it has been paid in full. In these cases the five-year time limit on the payments shall not apply.
SEC. 2.Section 34179 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:34179.(a)Each successor agency shall have an oversight board composed of seven members. The members shall elect one of their members as the chairperson and shall report the name of the chairperson and other members to the Department of Finance on or before May 1, 2012. Members shall be selected as follows:
(1)One member appointed by the county board of supervisors.
(2)One member appointed by the mayor for the city that formed the redevelopment agency.
(3)(A)One member appointed by the largest special district, by property tax share, with territory in the territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency, which is of the type of special district that is eligible to receive property tax revenues pursuant to Section 34188.
(B)On or after the effective date of this subparagraph, the county auditor-controller may determine which is the largest special district for purposes of this section.
(4)One member appointed by the county superintendent of education to represent schools if the superintendent is elected. If the county superintendent of education is appointed, then the appointment made pursuant to this paragraph shall be made by the county board of education.
(5)One member appointed by the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges to represent community college districts in the county.
(6)One member of the public appointed by the county board of supervisors.
(7)One member representing the employees of the former redevelopment agency appointed by the mayor or chair of the board of supervisors, as the case may be, from the recognized employee organization representing the largest number of former redevelopment agency employees employed by the successor agency at that time. In the case where city or county employees performed administrative duties of the former redevelopment agency, the appointment shall be made from the recognized employee organization representing those employees. If a recognized employee organization does not exist for either the employees of the former redevelopment agency or the city or county employees performing administrative duties of the former redevelopment agency, the appointment shall be made from among the employees of the successor agency. In voting to approve a contract as an enforceable obligation, a member appointed pursuant to this paragraph shall not be deemed to be interested in the contract by virtue of being an employee of the successor agency or community for purposes of Section 1090 of the Government Code.
(8)If the county or a joint powers agency formed the redevelopment agency, then the largest city by acreage in the territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency may select one member. If there are no cities with territory in a project area of the redevelopment agency, the county superintendent of education may appoint an additional member to represent the public.
(9)If there are no special districts of the type that are eligible to receive property tax pursuant to Section 34188, within the territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency, then the county may appoint one member to represent the public.
(10)If a redevelopment agency was formed by an entity that is both a charter city and a county, the oversight board shall be composed of seven members selected as follows: three members appointed by the mayor of the city, if that appointment is subject to confirmation by the county board of supervisors, one member appointed by the largest special district, by property tax share, with territory in the territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency, which is the type of special district that is eligible to receive property tax revenues pursuant to Section 34188, one member appointed by the county superintendent of education to represent schools, one member appointed by the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges to represent community college districts, and one member representing employees of the former redevelopment agency appointed by the mayor of the city if that appointment is subject to confirmation by the county board of supervisors, to represent the largest number of former redevelopment agency employees employed by the successor agency at that time.
(11)Each appointing authority identified in this subdivision may, but is not required to, appoint an alternate representative representatives to serve on the oversight board as may be necessary to attend any meeting of the oversight board in the event that the appointing authoritys primary representative is unable to attend any meeting for any reason. If the an alternate representative attends any meeting in place of the primary representative, the alternative representative shall have the same participatory and voting rights as all other attending members of the oversight board. The successor agency shall promptly notify the department regarding the appointment of any alternate representative representatives to the oversight board.
(b)The Governor may appoint individuals to fill any oversight board member position described in subdivision (a) that has not been filled by May 15, 2012, or any member position that remains vacant for more than 60 days.
(c)The oversight board may direct the staff of the successor agency to perform work in furtherance of the oversight boards duties and responsibilities under this part. The successor agency shall pay for all of the costs of meetings of the oversight board and may include such costs in its administrative budget. Oversight board members shall serve without compensation or reimbursement for expenses.
(d)Oversight board members are protected by the immunities applicable to public entities and public employees governed by Part 1 (commencing with Section 810) and Part 2 (commencing with Section 814) of Division 3.6 of Title 1 of the Government Code.
(e)A majority of the total membership of the oversight board shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. A majority vote of the total membership of the oversight board is required for the oversight board to take action. The oversight board shall be deemed to be a local entity for purposes of the Ralph M. Brown Act, the California Public Records Act, and the Political Reform Act of 1974. All actions taken by the oversight board shall be adopted by resolution.
(f)All notices required by law for proposed oversight board actions shall also be posted on the successor agencys Internet Web site or the oversight boards Internet Web site.
(g)Each member of an oversight board shall serve at the pleasure of the entity that appointed such member.
(h)The Department of Finance may review an oversight board action taken pursuant to this part. Written notice and information about all actions taken by an oversight board shall be provided to the department by electronic means and in a manner of the departments choosing. An action shall become effective five business days after notice in the manner specified by the department is provided unless the department requests a review. Each oversight board shall designate an official to whom the department may make those requests and who shall provide the department with the telephone number and email contact information for the purpose of communicating with the department pursuant to this subdivision. Except as otherwise provided in this part, in the event that the department requests a review of a given oversight board action, it shall have 40 days from the date of its request to approve the oversight board action or return it to the oversight board for reconsideration and the oversight board action shall not be effective until approved by the department. In the event that the department returns the oversight board action to the oversight board for reconsideration, the oversight board shall resubmit the modified action for department approval and the modified oversight board action shall not become effective until approved by the department. If the department reviews a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule, the department may eliminate or modify any item on that schedule prior to its approval. The county auditor-controller shall reflect the actions of the department in determining the amount of property tax revenues to allocate to the successor agency. The department shall provide notice to the successor agency and the county auditor-controller as to the reasons for its actions. To the extent that an oversight board continues to dispute a determination with the department, one or more future recognized obligation schedules may reflect any resolution of that dispute. The department may also agree to an amendment to a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule to reflect a resolution of a disputed item; however, this shall not affect a past allocation of property tax or create a liability for any affected taxing entity.
(i)Oversight boards shall have fiduciary responsibilities to holders of enforceable obligations and the taxing entities that benefit from distributions of property tax and other revenues pursuant to Section 34188. Further, the provisions of Division 4 (commencing with Section 1000) of the Government Code shall apply to oversight boards. Notwithstanding Section 1099 of the Government Code, or any other law, any individual may simultaneously be appointed to up to five oversight boards and may hold an office in a city, county, city and county, special district, school district, or community college district.
(j)Commencing on and after July 1, 2016, in each county where more than one oversight board was created by operation of the act adding this part, there shall be only one oversight board appointed as follows:
(1)One member may be appointed by the county board of supervisors.
(2)One member may be appointed by the city selection committee established pursuant to Section 50270 of the Government Code. In a city and county, the mayor may appoint one member.
(3)One member may be appointed by the independent special district selection committee established pursuant to Section 56332 of the Government Code, for the types of special districts that are eligible to receive property tax revenues pursuant to Section 34188.
(4)One member may be appointed by the county superintendent of education to represent schools if the superintendent is elected. If the county superintendent of education is appointed, then the appointment made pursuant to this paragraph shall be made by the county board of education.
(5)One member may be appointed by the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges to represent community college districts in the county.
(6)One member of the public may be appointed by the county board of supervisors.
(7)One member may be appointed by the recognized employee organization representing the largest number of successor agency employees in the county.
(k)The Governor may appoint individuals to fill any oversight board member position described in subdivision (j) that has not been filled by July 15, 2016, or any member position that remains vacant for more than 60 days.
(l)Commencing on and after July 1, 2016, in each county where only one oversight board was created by operation of the act adding this part, then there will be no change to the composition of that oversight board as a result of the operation of subdivision (b).
(m)Any oversight board for a given successor agency shall cease to exist when all of the indebtedness of the dissolved redevelopment agency has been repaid.
(n)An oversight board may direct a successor agency to provide additional legal or financial advice than what was given by agency staff.
(o)An oversight board is authorized to contract with the county or other public or private agencies for administrative support.
(p)On matters within the purview of the oversight board, decisions made by the oversight board supersede those made by the successor agency or the staff of the successor agency.
SEC. 3.Section 34191.4 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:34191.4.The following provisions shall apply to any successor agency that has been issued a finding of completion by the Department of Finance:
(a)All real property and interests in real property identified in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (5) of subdivision (c) of Section 34179.5 shall be transferred to the Community Redevelopment Property Trust Fund of the successor agency upon approval by the Department of Finance of the long-range property management plan submitted by the successor agency pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 34191.5 unless that property is subject to the requirements of any existing enforceable obligation.
(b)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (d) of Section 34171, upon application by the successor agency and approval by the oversight board, loan agreements entered into between the redevelopment agency and the city, county, or city and county that created the redevelopment agency shall be deemed to be enforceable obligations provided that the oversight board makes a finding that the loan was for legitimate redevelopment purposes.
(2)If the oversight board finds that the loan is an enforceable obligation, the accumulated interest on the remaining principal amount of the loan shall be recalculated from origination at the interest rate earned by funds deposited into the Local Agency Investment Fund. The loan shall be repaid to the city, county, or city and county in accordance with a defined schedule over a reasonable term of years at an interest rate not to exceed the interest rate earned by funds deposited into the Local Agency Investment Fund. The annual loan repayments provided for in the recognized obligation payment schedules shall be subject to all of the following limitations:
(A)Loan repayments shall not be made prior to the 201314 fiscal year. Beginning in the 201314 fiscal year, the maximum repayment amount authorized each fiscal year for repayments made pursuant to this subdivision and paragraph (7) of subdivision (e) of Section 34176 combined shall be equal to one-half of the increase between the amount distributed to the taxing entities pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 in that fiscal year and the amount distributed to taxing entities pursuant to that paragraph in the 201213 base year, provided, however, that calculation of the amount distributed to taxing entities during the 201213 base year shall not include any amounts distributed to taxing entities pursuant to the due diligence review process established in Sections 34179.5 to 34179.8, inclusive. Loan or deferral repayments made pursuant to this subdivision shall be second in priority to amounts to be repaid pursuant to paragraph (7) of subdivision (e) of Section 34176.
(B)Repayments received by the city, county, or city and county that formed the redevelopment agency shall first be used to retire any outstanding amounts borrowed and owed to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund of the former redevelopment agency for purposes of the Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund and shall be distributed to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund established by subdivision (d) of Section 34176.
(C)Twenty percent of any loan repayment shall be deducted from the loan repayment amount and shall be transferred to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund, after all outstanding loans from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund for purposes of the Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund have been paid.
(c)(1)Bond proceeds derived from bonds issued on or before December 31, 2010, shall be used for the purposes for which the bonds were sold.
(2)(A)Notwithstanding Section 34177.3 or any other conflicting provision of law, bond proceeds in excess of the amounts needed to satisfy approved enforceable obligations shall thereafter be expended in a manner consistent with the original bond covenants. Enforceable obligations may be satisfied by the creation of reserves for projects that are the subject of the enforceable obligation and that are consistent with the contractual obligations for those projects, or by expending funds to complete the projects. An expenditure made pursuant to this paragraph shall constitute the creation of excess bond proceeds obligations to be paid from the excess proceeds. Excess bond proceeds obligations shall be listed separately on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule submitted by the successor agency.
(B)If remaining bond proceeds cannot be spent in a manner consistent with the bond covenants pursuant to subparagraph (A), the proceeds shall be used to defease the bonds or to purchase those same outstanding bonds on the open market for cancellation.
(d)Notwithstanding subdivision (b) of Section 34163, if a successor agency has received a finding of completion, with the approval of the successor agencys oversight board, the successor agency may enter into, or amend or modify existing, contracts and agreements, or otherwise administer projects in connection with enforceable obligations approved pursuant to subdivision (m) of Section 34177, including the substitution of private developer capital in a disposition and development agreement that has been deemed an enforceable obligation, if the contract, agreement, or project will not commit new property tax funds, and will not otherwise directly or indirectly reduce property tax revenues or payments made pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 to the taxing agencies.
SEC. 4.Section 34191.5 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:34191.5.(a)There is hereby established a Community Redevelopment Property Trust Fund, administered by the successor agency, to serve as the repository of the former redevelopment agencys real properties identified in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (5) of subdivision (c) of Section 34179.5.
(b)The successor agency shall prepare a long-range property management plan that addresses the disposition and use of the real properties of the former redevelopment agency. The report shall be submitted to the oversight board and the Department of Finance for approval no later than six months following the issuance to the successor agency of the finding of completion.
(c)The long-range property management plan shall do all of the following:
(1)Include an inventory of all properties in the trust. The inventory shall consist of all of the following information:
(A)The date of the acquisition of the property and the value of the property at that time, and an estimate of the current value of the property.
(B)The purpose for which the property was acquired.
(C)Parcel data, including address, lot size, and current zoning in the former agency redevelopment plan or specific, community, or general plan.
(D)An estimate of the current value of the parcel including, if available, any appraisal information.
(E)An estimate of any lease, rental, or any other revenues generated by the property, and a description of the contractual requirements for the disposition of those funds.
(F)The history of environmental contamination, including designation as a brownfield site, any related environmental studies, and history of any remediation efforts.
(G)A description of the propertys potential for transit-oriented development and the advancement of the planning objectives of the successor agency.
(H)A brief history of previous development proposals and activity, including the rental or lease of property.
(2)Address the use or disposition of all of the properties in the trust. Permissible uses include the retention of the property for governmental use pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 34181, the retention of the property for future development, the sale of the property, or the use of the property to fulfill an enforceable obligation. The plan shall separately identify and list properties in the trust dedicated to governmental use purposes and properties retained for purposes of fulfilling an enforceable obligation. With respect to the use or disposition of all other properties, all of the following shall apply:
(A)(i)If the plan directs the use or liquidation of the property for a project identified in an approved redevelopment plan, the property shall transfer to the city, county, or city and county.
(ii)For purposes of this subparagraph, the term identified in an approved redevelopment plan includes properties listed in a community plan or a five-year implementation plan.
(iii)The department or an oversight board may require approval of a compensation agreement or agreements, as described in subdivision (f) of Section 34180, prior to any transfer of property pursuant to this subparagraph, provided, however, that a compensation agreement or agreements may be developed and executed subsequent to the approval process of a long-range property management plan.
(B)If the plan directs the liquidation of the property or the use of revenues generated from the property, such as lease or parking revenues, for any purpose other than to fulfill an enforceable obligation or other than that specified in subparagraph (A), the proceeds from the sale shall be distributed as property tax to the taxing entities.
(C)Property shall not be transferred to a successor agency, city, county, or city and county, unless the long-range property management plan has been approved by the oversight board and the Department of Finance.
(d)The department may require approval of a compensation agreement or agreements, as described in subdivision (f) of Section 34180, except that the department shall not require approval of a compensation agreement or agreements as part of the approval process of a long-range property management plan.
(e)
(d)The department shall only consider whether the long-range property management plan makes a good faith effort to address the requirements set forth in subdivision (c).
(f)
(e)The department shall approve long-range property management plans as expeditiously as possible.
(g)
(f)Actions relating to the disposition of property after approval of a long-range property management plan shall not require review by the department.
The following terms shall have the following meanings:
(a)Administrative budget means the budget for administrative costs of the successor agencies as provided in Section 34177.
(b)Administrative cost allowance means an amount that, subject to the approval of the oversight board, is payable from property tax revenues of up to 5 percent of the property tax allocated to the successor agency on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule covering the period January 1, 2012, through June 30, 2012, and up to 3 percent of the property tax allocated to the Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund money that is allocated to the successor agency for each fiscal year thereafter; provided, however, that the amount shall not be less than two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000), unless the oversight board reduces this amount, for any fiscal year or such lesser amount as agreed to by the successor agency. However, the allowance amount shall exclude, and shall not apply to, any administrative costs that can be paid from bond proceeds or from sources other than property tax. Administrative cost allowances shall exclude any litigation expenses related to assets or obligations, settlements and judgments, and the costs of maintaining assets prior to disposition. Employee costs associated with work on specific project implementation activities, including, but not limited to, construction inspection, project management, or actual construction, shall be considered project-specific costs and shall not constitute administrative costs.
(c)Designated local authority shall mean a public entity formed pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 34173.
(d)(1)Enforceable obligation means any of the following:
(A)Bonds, as defined by Section 33602 and bonds issued pursuant to Chapter 10.5 (commencing with Section 5850) of Division 6 of Title 1 of the Government Code, including the required debt service, reserve set-asides, and any other payments required under the indenture or similar documents governing the issuance of the outstanding bonds of the former redevelopment agency. A reserve may be held when required by the bond indenture or when the next property tax allocation will be insufficient to pay all obligations due under the provisions of the bond for the next payment due in the following half of the calendar year.
(B)Loans of moneys borrowed by the redevelopment agency for a lawful purpose, to the extent they are legally required to be repaid pursuant to a required repayment schedule or other mandatory loan terms.
(C)Payments required by the federal government, preexisting obligations to the state or obligations imposed by state law, other than passthrough payments that are made by the county auditor-controller pursuant to Section 34183, or legally enforceable payments required in connection with the agencies employees, including, but not limited to, pension payments, pension obligation debt service, unemployment payments, or other obligations conferred through a collective bargaining agreement. Costs incurred to fulfill collective bargaining agreements for layoffs or terminations of city employees who performed work directly on behalf of the former redevelopment agency shall be considered enforceable obligations payable from property tax funds. The obligations to employees specified in this subparagraph shall remain enforceable obligations payable from property tax funds for any employee to whom those obligations apply if that employee is transferred to the entity assuming the housing functions of the former redevelopment agency pursuant to Section 34176. The successor agency or designated local authority shall enter into an agreement with the housing entity to reimburse it for any costs of the employee obligations.
(D)Judgments or settlements entered by a competent court of law or binding arbitration decisions against the former redevelopment agency, other than passthrough payments that are made by the county auditor-controller pursuant to Section 34183. Along with the successor agency, the oversight board shall have the authority and standing to appeal any judgment or to set aside any settlement or arbitration decision.
(E)Any legally binding and enforceable agreement or contract that is not otherwise void as violating the debt limit or public policy. However, nothing in this act shall prohibit either the successor agency, with the approval or at the direction of the oversight board, or the oversight board itself from terminating any existing agreements or contracts and providing any necessary and required compensation or remediation for such termination. Titles of or headings used on or in a document shall not be relevant in determining the existence of an enforceable obligation.
(F)Contracts or agreements necessary for the administration or operation of the successor agency, in accordance with this part, including, but not limited to, agreements concerning litigation expenses related to assets or obligations, settlements and judgments, and the costs of maintaining assets prior to disposition, and agreements to purchase or rent office space, equipment and supplies, and pay-related expenses pursuant to Section 33127 and for carrying insurance pursuant to Section 33134.
(G)Amounts borrowed from, or payments owing to, the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund of a redevelopment agency, which had been deferred as of the effective date of the act adding this part; provided, however, that the repayment schedule is approved by the oversight board. Repayments shall be transferred to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund established pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 34176 as a housing asset and shall be used in a manner consistent with the affordable housing requirements of the Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000)).
(2)For purposes of this part, enforceable obligation does not include any agreements, contracts, or arrangements between the city, county, or city and county that created the redevelopment agency and the former redevelopment agency. However, written agreements entered into (A) at the time of issuance, but in no event later than December 31, 2010, of indebtedness obligations, and (B) solely for the purpose of securing or repaying those indebtedness obligations may be deemed enforceable obligations for purposes of this part. Notwithstanding this paragraph, loan agreements entered into between the redevelopment agency and the city, county, or city and county that created it, within two years of the date of creation of the redevelopment agency, may be deemed to be enforceable obligations. Notwithstanding this paragraph, an agreement entered into by the redevelopment agency prior to June 30, 2011, is an enforceable obligation if the agreement relates to state highway infrastructure improvements to which the redevelopment agency committed funds pursuant to Section 33445.
(3)Contracts or agreements between the former redevelopment agency and other public agencies, to perform services or provide funding for governmental or private services or capital projects outside of redevelopment project areas that do not provide benefit to the redevelopment project and thus were not properly authorized under Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000) shall be deemed void on the effective date of this part; provided, however, that such contracts or agreements for the provision of housing properly authorized under Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000) shall not be deemed void.
(e)Indebtedness obligations means bonds, notes, certificates of participation, or other evidence of indebtedness, issued or delivered by the redevelopment agency, or by a joint exercise of powers authority created by the redevelopment agency, to third-party investors or bondholders to finance or refinance redevelopment projects undertaken by the redevelopment agency in compliance with the Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000)).
(f)Oversight board shall mean each entity established pursuant to Section 34179.
(g)Recognized obligation means an obligation listed in the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule.
(h)Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule means the document setting forth the minimum payment amounts and due dates of payments required by enforceable obligations for each six-month fiscal period as provided in subdivision (m) of Section 34177.
(i)School entity means any entity defined as such in subdivision (f) of Section 95 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(j)Successor agency means the successor entity to the former redevelopment agency as described in Section 34173.
(k)Taxing entities means cities, counties, a city and county, special districts, and school entities, as defined in subdivision (f) of Section 95 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, that receive passthrough payments and distributions of property taxes pursuant to the provisions of this part.
(l)Property taxes include all property tax revenues, including those from unitary and supplemental and roll corrections applicable to tax increment.
(m)Department means the Department of Finance unless the context clearly refers to another state agency.
(n)Sponsoring entity means the city, county, or city and county, or other entity that authorized the creation of each redevelopment agency.
(o)Final judicial determination means a final judicial determination made by any state court that is not appealed, or by a court of appellate jurisdiction that is not further appealed, in an action by any party.
(p)From July 1, 2014, to July 1, 2018, inclusive, housing entity administrative cost allowance means an amount of up to 1 percent of the property tax allocated to the Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund on behalf of the successor agency for each applicable fiscal year, but not less than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) per fiscal year.
(1)If a local housing authority assumed the housing functions of the former redevelopment agency pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 34176, then the housing entity administrative cost allowance shall be listed by the successor agency on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule. Upon approval of the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule by the oversight board and the department, the housing entity administrative cost allowance shall be remitted by the successor agency on each January 2 and July 1 to the local housing authority that assumed the housing functions of the former redevelopment agency pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 34176.
(2)If there are insufficient moneys in the Redevelopment Obligations Retirement Fund in a given fiscal year to make the payment authorized by this subdivision, the unfunded amount may be listed on each subsequent Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule until it has been paid in full. In these cases the five-year time limit on the payments shall not apply.
SEC. 2.Section 34179 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:34179.(a)Each successor agency shall have an oversight board composed of seven members. The members shall elect one of their members as the chairperson and shall report the name of the chairperson and other members to the Department of Finance on or before May 1, 2012. Members shall be selected as follows:
(1)One member appointed by the county board of supervisors.
(2)One member appointed by the mayor for the city that formed the redevelopment agency.
(3)(A)One member appointed by the largest special district, by property tax share, with territory in the territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency, which is of the type of special district that is eligible to receive property tax revenues pursuant to Section 34188.
(B)On or after the effective date of this subparagraph, the county auditor-controller may determine which is the largest special district for purposes of this section.
(4)One member appointed by the county superintendent of education to represent schools if the superintendent is elected. If the county superintendent of education is appointed, then the appointment made pursuant to this paragraph shall be made by the county board of education.
(5)One member appointed by the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges to represent community college districts in the county.
(6)One member of the public appointed by the county board of supervisors.
(7)One member representing the employees of the former redevelopment agency appointed by the mayor or chair of the board of supervisors, as the case may be, from the recognized employee organization representing the largest number of former redevelopment agency employees employed by the successor agency at that time. In the case where city or county employees performed administrative duties of the former redevelopment agency, the appointment shall be made from the recognized employee organization representing those employees. If a recognized employee organization does not exist for either the employees of the former redevelopment agency or the city or county employees performing administrative duties of the former redevelopment agency, the appointment shall be made from among the employees of the successor agency. In voting to approve a contract as an enforceable obligation, a member appointed pursuant to this paragraph shall not be deemed to be interested in the contract by virtue of being an employee of the successor agency or community for purposes of Section 1090 of the Government Code.
(8)If the county or a joint powers agency formed the redevelopment agency, then the largest city by acreage in the territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency may select one member. If there are no cities with territory in a project area of the redevelopment agency, the county superintendent of education may appoint an additional member to represent the public.
(9)If there are no special districts of the type that are eligible to receive property tax pursuant to Section 34188, within the territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency, then the county may appoint one member to represent the public.
(10)If a redevelopment agency was formed by an entity that is both a charter city and a county, the oversight board shall be composed of seven members selected as follows: three members appointed by the mayor of the city, if that appointment is subject to confirmation by the county board of supervisors, one member appointed by the largest special district, by property tax share, with territory in the territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency, which is the type of special district that is eligible to receive property tax revenues pursuant to Section 34188, one member appointed by the county superintendent of education to represent schools, one member appointed by the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges to represent community college districts, and one member representing employees of the former redevelopment agency appointed by the mayor of the city if that appointment is subject to confirmation by the county board of supervisors, to represent the largest number of former redevelopment agency employees employed by the successor agency at that time.
(11)Each appointing authority identified in this subdivision may, but is not required to, appoint an alternate representative to serve on the oversight board as may be necessary to attend any meeting of the oversight board in the event that the appointing authoritys primary representative is unable to attend any meeting for any reason. If the alternate representative attends any meeting in place of the primary representative, the alternative representative shall have the same participatory and voting rights as all other attending members of the oversight board. The successor agency shall promptly notify the department regarding the appointment of any alternate representative to the oversight board.
(b)The Governor may appoint individuals to fill any oversight board member position described in subdivision (a) that has not been filled by May 15, 2012, or any member position that remains vacant for more than 60 days.
(c)The oversight board may direct the staff of the successor agency to perform work in furtherance of the oversight boards duties and responsibilities under this part. The successor agency shall pay for all of the costs of meetings of the oversight board and may include such costs in its administrative budget. Oversight board members shall serve without compensation or reimbursement for expenses.
(d)Oversight board members are protected by the immunities applicable to public entities and public employees governed by Part 1 (commencing with Section 810) and Part 2 (commencing with Section 814) of Division 3.6 of Title 1 of the Government Code.
(e)A majority of the total membership of the oversight board shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. A majority vote of the total membership of the oversight board is required for the oversight board to take action. The oversight board shall be deemed to be a local entity for purposes of the Ralph M. Brown Act, the California Public Records Act, and the Political Reform Act of 1974. All actions taken by the oversight board shall be adopted by resolution.
(f)All notices required by law for proposed oversight board actions shall also be posted on the successor agencys Internet Web site or the oversight boards Internet Web site.
(g)Each member of an oversight board shall serve at the pleasure of the entity that appointed such member.
(h)The Department of Finance may review an oversight board action taken pursuant to this part. Written notice and information about all actions taken by an oversight board shall be provided to the department by electronic means and in a manner of the departments choosing. An action shall become effective five business days after notice in the manner specified by the department is provided unless the department requests a review. Each oversight board shall designate an official to whom the department may make those requests and who shall provide the department with the telephone number and e-mail email contact information for the purpose of communicating with the department pursuant to this subdivision. Except as otherwise provided in this part, in the event that the department requests a review of a given oversight board action, it shall have 40 days from the date of its request to approve the oversight board action or return it to the oversight board for reconsideration and the oversight board action shall not be effective until approved by the department. In the event that the department returns the oversight board action to the oversight board for reconsideration, the oversight board shall resubmit the modified action for department approval and the modified oversight board action shall not become effective until approved by the department. If the department reviews a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule, the department may eliminate or modify any item on that schedule prior to its approval. The county auditor-controller shall reflect the actions of the department in determining the amount of property tax revenues to allocate to the successor agency. The department shall provide notice to the successor agency and the county auditor-controller as to the reasons for its actions. To the extent that an oversight board continues to dispute a determination with the department, one or more future recognized obligation schedules may reflect any resolution of that dispute. The department may also agree to an amendment to a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule to reflect a resolution of a disputed item; however, this shall not affect a past allocation of property tax or create a liability for any affected taxing entity.
(i)Oversight boards shall have fiduciary responsibilities to holders of enforceable obligations and the taxing entities that benefit from distributions of property tax and other revenues pursuant to Section 34188. Further, the provisions of Division 4 (commencing with Section 1000) of the Government Code shall apply to oversight boards. Notwithstanding Section 1099 of the Government Code, or any other law, any individual may simultaneously be appointed to up to five oversight boards and may hold an office in a city, county, city and county, special district, school district, or community college district.
(j)Commencing on and after July 1, 2016, in each county where more than one oversight board was created by operation of the act adding this part, there shall be only one oversight board appointed as follows:
(1)One member may be appointed by the county board of supervisors.
(2)One member may be appointed by the city selection committee established pursuant to Section 50270 of the Government Code. In a city and county, the mayor may appoint one member.
(3)One member may be appointed by the independent special district selection committee established pursuant to Section 56332 of the Government Code, for the types of special districts that are eligible to receive property tax revenues pursuant to Section 34188.
(4)One member may be appointed by the county superintendent of education to represent schools if the superintendent is elected. If the county superintendent of education is appointed, then the appointment made pursuant to this paragraph shall be made by the county board of education.
(5)One member may be appointed by the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges to represent community college districts in the county.
(6)One member of the public may be appointed by the county board of supervisors.
(7)One member may be appointed by the recognized employee organization representing the largest number of successor agency employees in the county.
(k)The Governor may appoint individuals to fill any oversight board member position described in subdivision (j) that has not been filled by July 15, 2016, or any member position that remains vacant for more than 60 days.
(l)Commencing on and after July 1, 2016, in each county where only one oversight board was created by operation of the act adding this part, then there will be no change to the composition of that oversight board as a result of the operation of subdivision (b).
(m)Any oversight board for a given successor agency shall cease to exist when all of the indebtedness of the dissolved redevelopment agency has been repaid.
(n)An oversight board may direct a successor agency to provide additional legal or financial advice than what was given by agency staff.
(o)An oversight board is authorized to contract with the county or other public or private agencies for administrative support.
(p)On matters within the purview of the oversight board, decisions made by the oversight board supersede those made by the successor agency or the staff of the successor agency.
SEC. 3.Section 34191.4 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:34191.4.The following provisions shall apply to any successor agency that has been issued a finding of completion by the Department of Finance:
(a)All real property and interests in real property identified in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (5) of subdivision (c) of Section 34179.5 shall be transferred to the Community Redevelopment Property Trust Fund of the successor agency upon approval by the Department of Finance of the long-range property management plan submitted by the successor agency pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 34191.5 unless that property is subject to the requirements of any existing enforceable obligation.
(b)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (d) of Section 34171, upon application by the successor agency and approval by the oversight board, loan agreements entered into between the redevelopment agency and the city, county, or city and county that created the redevelopment agency shall be deemed to be enforceable obligations provided that the oversight board makes a finding that the loan was for legitimate redevelopment purposes.
(2)If the oversight board finds that the loan is an enforceable obligation, the accumulated interest on the remaining principal amount of the loan shall be recalculated from origination at the interest rate earned by funds deposited into the Local Agency Investment Fund. The loan shall be repaid to the city, county, or city and county in accordance with a defined schedule over a reasonable term of years at an interest rate not to exceed the interest rate earned by funds deposited into the Local Agency Investment Fund. The annual loan repayments provided for in the recognized obligation payment schedules shall be subject to all of the following limitations:
(A)Loan repayments shall not be made prior to the 201314 fiscal year. Beginning in the 201314 fiscal year, the maximum repayment amount authorized each fiscal year for repayments made pursuant to this subdivision and paragraph (7) of subdivision (e) of Section 34176 combined shall be equal to one-half of the increase between the amount distributed to the taxing entities pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 in that fiscal year and the amount distributed to taxing entities pursuant to that paragraph in the 201213 base year, provided, however, that calculation of the amount distributed to taxing entities during the 201213 base year shall not include any amounts distributed to taxing entities pursuant to the due diligence review process established in Sections 34179.5 to 34179.8, inclusive. Loan or deferral repayments made pursuant to this subdivision shall be second in priority to amounts to be repaid pursuant to paragraph (7) of subdivision (e) of Section 34176.
(B)Repayments received by the city, county, or city and county that formed the redevelopment agency shall first be used to retire any outstanding amounts borrowed and owed to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund of the former redevelopment agency for purposes of the Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund and shall be distributed to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund established by subdivision (d) of Section 34176.
(C)Twenty percent of any loan repayment shall be deducted from the loan repayment amount and shall be transferred to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund, after all outstanding loans from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund for purposes of the Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund have been paid.
(c)(1)Bond proceeds derived from bonds issued on or before December 31, 2010, shall be used for the purposes for which the bonds were sold.
(2)(A)Notwithstanding Section 34177.3 or any other conflicting provision of law, bond proceeds in excess of the amounts needed to satisfy approved enforceable obligations shall thereafter be expended in a manner consistent with the original bond covenants. Enforceable obligations may be satisfied by the creation of reserves for projects that are the subject of the enforceable obligation and that are consistent with the contractual obligations for those projects, or by expending funds to complete the projects. An expenditure made pursuant to this paragraph shall constitute the creation of excess bond proceeds obligations to be paid from the excess proceeds. Excess bond proceeds obligations shall be listed separately on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule submitted by the successor agency.
(B)If remaining bond proceeds cannot be spent in a manner consistent with the bond covenants pursuant to subparagraph (A), the proceeds shall be used to defease the bonds or to purchase those same outstanding bonds on the open market for cancellation.
(d)Notwithstanding subdivision (b) of Section 34163, if a successor agency has received a finding of completion, the successor agency may enter into, or amend existing, contracts and agreements, or otherwise administer projects in connection with enforceable obligations approved pursuant to subdivision (m) of Section 34177, including the substitution of private developer capital in a disposition and development agreement that has been deemed an enforceable obligation, if the contract, agreement, or project will not commit new property tax funds, and will not otherwise reduce property tax revenues or payments made pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 to the taxing agencies.
SEC. 4.Section 34191.5 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:34191.5.(a)There is hereby established a Community Redevelopment Property Trust Fund, administered by the successor agency, to serve as the repository of the former redevelopment agencys real properties identified in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (5) of subdivision (c) of Section 34179.5.
(b)The successor agency shall prepare a long-range property management plan that addresses the disposition and use of the real properties of the former redevelopment agency. The report shall be submitted to the oversight board and the Department of Finance for approval no later than six months following the issuance to the successor agency of the finding of completion.
(c)The long-range property management plan shall do all of the following:
(1)Include an inventory of all properties in the trust. The inventory shall consist of all of the following information:
(A)The date of the acquisition of the property and the value of the property at that time, and an estimate of the current value of the property.
(B)The purpose for which the property was acquired.
(C)Parcel data, including address, lot size, and current zoning in the former agency redevelopment plan or specific, community, or general plan.
(D)An estimate of the current value of the parcel including, if available, any appraisal information.
(E)An estimate of any lease, rental, or any other revenues generated by the property, and a description of the contractual requirements for the disposition of those funds.
(F)The history of environmental contamination, including designation as a brownfield site, any related environmental studies, and history of any remediation efforts.
(G)A description of the propertys potential for transit-oriented development and the advancement of the planning objectives of the successor agency.
(H)A brief history of previous development proposals and activity, including the rental or lease of property.
(2)Address the use or disposition of all of the properties in the trust. Permissible uses include the retention of the property for governmental use pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 34181, the retention of the property for future development, the sale of the property, or the use of the property to fulfill an enforceable obligation. The plan shall separately identify and list properties in the trust dedicated to governmental use purposes and properties retained for purposes of fulfilling an enforceable obligation. With respect to the use or disposition of all other properties, all of the following shall apply:
(A)(i)If the plan directs the use or liquidation of the property for a project identified in an approved redevelopment plan, the property shall transfer to the city, county, or city and county.
(ii)For purposes of this subparagraph, the term identified in an approved redevelopment plan includes properties listed in a community plan or a five-year implementation plan.
(B)If the plan directs the liquidation of the property or the use of revenues generated from the property, such as lease or parking revenues, for any purpose other than to fulfill an enforceable obligation or other than that specified in subparagraph (A), the proceeds from the sale shall be distributed as property tax to the taxing entities.
(C)Property shall not be transferred to a successor agency, city, county, or city and county, unless the long-range property management plan has been approved by the oversight board and the Department of Finance.
(d)The department may require approval of a compensation agreement or agreements, as described in subdivision (f) of Section 34180, except that the department shall not require approval of a compensation agreement or agreements as part of the approval process of a long-range property management plan.
(e)The department shall only consider whether the long-range property management plan makes a good faith effort to address the requirements set forth in subdivision (c).
(f)The department shall approve long-range property management plans as expeditiously as possible.
(g)Actions relating to the disposition of property after approval of a long-range property management plan shall not require review by the department.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2016 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. |
| Jun 6, 2016 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F. |
| Jun 20, 2016 | From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 15). |
| Jun 21, 2016 | Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading. |
| Aug 1, 2016 | Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading. |
| Aug 2, 2016 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Aug 3, 2016 | Ordered to special consent calendar. |
| Aug 8, 2016 | Ordered to third reading. |
| Aug 8, 2016 | Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading. |
| Aug 9, 2016 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Apr 14, 2016 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F. |
| Aug 15, 2016 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 4988.). |
| Aug 15, 2016 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0.). |
| Aug 16, 2016 | In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 18 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77. |
| Aug 18, 2016 | Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2. |
| Aug 25, 2016 | From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) . |
| Aug 30, 2016 | Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. |
| Aug 30, 2016 | Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6421.). |
| Sep 8, 2016 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m. |
| May 28, 2015 | From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 28). |
| Feb 27, 2015 | From printer. May be heard in committee March 29. |
| Mar 12, 2015 | Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and H. & C.D. |
| Apr 6, 2015 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended. |
| Apr 7, 2015 | Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. |
| Apr 16, 2015 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D. |
| Apr 29, 2015 | (action corrected May 4, 2015) |
| Apr 29, 2015 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Apr 29, 2015 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| May 13, 2015 | In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file. |
| Feb 26, 2015 | Read first time. To print. |
| May 28, 2015 | Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading. |
| Jun 1, 2015 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Jun 3, 2015 | In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. |
| Jun 3, 2015 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. |
| Jun 3, 2015 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 1857.) |
| Jun 18, 2015 | Referred to Com. on GOV. & F. |
| Jun 30, 2015 | In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. |
| Jul 13, 2015 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2016 | AB 806 DODD Concurrence in Senate Amendments | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Aug 25, 2016 | With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in. | Assembly Standing Committee on Local Government |
Passed |
|
| Aug 15, 2016 | Assembly 3rd Reading AB806 Dodd By Hertzberg | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Jun 15, 2016 | Do pass as amended | Senate Standing Committee on Governance and Finance |
Passed |
|
| Jun 3, 2015 | AB 806 DODD Assembly Third Reading | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| May 28, 2015 | Do pass as amended. | Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Apr 29, 2015 | Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar | Assembly Standing Committee on Housing and Community Development |
Passed |
|
| Apr 15, 2015 | Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Housing and Community Development] | Assembly Standing Committee on Local Government |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| California Association For Local Economic Development | ** Support | Aug 30, 2016 |
| California Infill Builders Federation | ** Support | Jun 3, 2015 |
| Cities of: | ** Support | Aug 30, 2016 |
| City of American Canyon | ** Support | Aug 15, 2016 |
| City Of Azusa | ** Support | Aug 15, 2016 |
| City of Fairfield [SPONSOR] | ** Support | Aug 30, 2016 |
| City Of Industry | ** Support | Aug 15, 2016 |
| Commerce, City Of | ** Support | Aug 15, 2016 |
| County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors | ** Support | Jun 3, 2015 |
| Fairfield-Suisun Chamber of Commerce | ** Support | Aug 30, 2016 |
| League of California Cities [SPONSOR] | ** Support | Aug 30, 2016 |
| Lystek International, Ltd. | ** Support | Aug 30, 2016 |
| Norwalk, City Of And Norwalk Redevelopment Agency | ** Support | Aug 15, 2016 |
| Santa Clara; County Of | ** Support | Apr 15, 2015 |
CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
CSA2 Bill Id:AB 806
Author:(Dodd and Frazier)
As Amended Ver:August 8, 2016
Majority vote
ASSEMBLY: |
| (June 3, 2015) | SENATE: | 38-0 | (August 15, 2016) |
(vote not relevant)
COMMITTEE VOTE: | 9-0 | (August 25, 2016) | RECOMMENDATION: | concur |
(L. Gov.)
Original Committee Reference: L. GOV.
SUMMARY: Allows counties and cities to acquire, sell, or lease county-owned or city-owned real property to promote economic development, subject to specified requirements.
The Senate amendments strike the existing contents of the bill, and instead:
- Specify that loan agreements, sale agreements, and lease agreements that meet specified criteria are included in the statutory definition of "economic opportunity."
- Prohibit, for the purposes of specified statutes authorizing the sale, lease, or transfer of property for the creation of an economic opportunity, a city, county, or city and county from selling, leasing, or otherwise transferring, at a price that is less than fair market value, any real property that was acquired through eminent domain. Exempt from this prohibition any property that is:
- Governed by a long-range property management plan pursuant to redevelopment law; and,
- A housing asset of a former redevelopment agency that is transferred to a city, county, or city and county, provided that the successor agency or designated local authority in the affected jurisdiction has received a finding of completion from the Department of Finance.
- Require that the creation of an economic opportunity shall be subject to statute that requires public agencies to disclose specified information, hold hearings and produce reports relating to economic development subsidies.
- Specify that the provisions of the bill shall be an alternative to any authority of a city, county, or city and county to create an economic opportunity or to acquire, sell, or lease property for economic development, found in the Constitution, state law, local ordinance, or charter, as specified.
- Allow a city, county, or city and county to acquire property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity, and may sell or lease property to create an economic opportunity.
- Delete statutory language that limits the authority to sell or lease city-owned or county-owned property for economic development purposes to property that is governed by a long-range property management plan, thereby allowing a city, county, or city and county to sell or lease any county-owned or city-owned property to create an economic opportunity, as defined.
- Require that a loan provided by a city or county to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures must be in the form of a written loan agreement that includes specified elements.
- Require that, before entering into a loan agreement, a city, county, or city and county, must find, after a public hearing, that the assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the development and that the assistance cannot be obtained on economically feasible terms in the private market.
- Make findings and declarations and additional clarifying and conforming changes to state law.
EXISTING LAW:
- Prohibits counties and general law cities from making a gift of public funds.
- Allows, generally, a city to dispose of real property in any way it chooses if doing so is for the common benefit. Allows a city to sell or lease real property for less than fair market value, without violating the constitutional prohibition against making a gift of public funds, if the sale or lease serves a public purpose.
- Requires a county to sell or lease property using a competitive sealed-bid process, as specified:
- A county board of supervisors must, by a two-thirds vote, adopt a resolution in a regular open meeting declaring its intention to sell or lease the property;
- The resolution must describe the property and the terms upon which it will be sold or leased; and,
- At least three weeks after adopting the resolution, the board must hold a public meeting at which sealed proposals to purchase or lease the property must be considered.
- Exempts a county from these requirements and allows it to sell real property at less than fair market value to provide housing that is affordable to low and moderate income residents.
AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY, this bill made various changes to provisions of law governing former redevelopment agencies (RDAs).
FISCAL EFFECT: None
COMMENTS:
- Bill Summary. This bill clarifies that a city or county may acquire, sell and lease property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity, and that such authority extends to any property and not just property that the city or county acquired from the successor agency to the redevelopment agency under the long range property management plan.
This bill is sponsored by the City of Fairfield and the League of California Cities.
- Author's Statement. According to the author, "In 2011 the Governor and Legislature eliminated redevelopment agencies in order to provide more property tax revenues to local taxing agencies. All redevelopment agencies in the State were dissolved as of February 1, 2012.
"In 2013, the Legislature adopted SB 470 [(Wright), Chapter 659] to promote economic development on a local level, to give local governments tools, at no cost to the state, that allow local governments to use their funds in a manner that promotes economic opportunity, and to provide cities, counties, and cities and counties certain powers previously afforded to redevelopment agencies that were critical to economic development.
"SB 470 declared that it is the policy of the State of California to protect and promote the sound development of economic opportunity in cities and counties. That whenever the creation of economic opportunity in cities and counties cannot be accomplished by private enterprise alone, without public participation and assistance in the acquisition of land, in planning and in the financing of land assembly, in the work of clearance, and in the making of improvements necessary therefor, it is in the public interest to advance or expend public funds for these purposes. That the creation of economic opportunity and the provisions for appropriate continuing land use and construction policies with respect to property acquired, in whole or in part, for economic opportunity constitute public uses and purposes for which public money may be advanced or expended and private property acquired, and are governmental functions of state concern in the interest of health, safety, and welfare of the people of the state and cities and counties.:
- Support Arguments. Supporters argue that this bill offers communities additional tools that can be used to rehabilitate deteriorated areas, attract and retain jobs, and improve local quality of life.
- Opposition Arguments. None on file.
Analysis Prepared by: Debbie Michel / L. GOV. / (916) 319-3958 FN: 0004934
Date of Hearing: August 25, 2016
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Susan Talamantes Eggman, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 806 (
Author:Dodd) – As Amended Ver:August 8, 2016
SUBJECT: Community development: economic opportunity
SUMMARY: Allows counties and cities to acquire, sell, or lease county-owned or city-owned real property to promote economic development, subject to specified requirements.
The Senate amendments strike the existing contents of the bill, and instead:
- Specify that loan agreements, sale agreements, and lease agreements that meet specified criteria are included in the statutory definition of “economic opportunity.”
- Prohibit, for the purposes of specified statutes authorizing the sale, lease, or transfer of property for the creation of an economic opportunity, a city, county, or city and county from selling, leasing, or otherwise transferring, at a price that is less than fair market value, any real property that was acquired through eminent domain. Exempt from this prohibition any property that is:
- Governed by a long-range property management plan pursuant to redevelopment law; and,
- A housing asset of a former redevelopment agency that is transferred to a city, county, or city and county, provided that the successor agency or designated local authority in the affected jurisdiction has received a finding of completion from the Department of Finance.
- Require that the creation of an economic opportunity shall be subject to statute that requires public agencies to disclose specified information, hold hearings and produce reports relating to economic development subsidies.
- Specify that the provisions of the bill shall be an alternative to any authority of a city, county, or city and county to create an economic opportunity or to acquire, sell, or lease property for economic development, found in the Constitution, state law, local ordinance, or charter, as specified.
- Allow a city, county, or city and county to acquire property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity, and may sell or lease property to create an economic opportunity.
- Delete statutory language that limits the authority to sell or lease city-owned or county-owned property for economic development purposes to property that is governed by a long-range property management plan, thereby allowing a city, county, or city and county to sell or lease any county-owned or city-owned property to create an economic opportunity, as defined.
- Require that a loan provided by a city or county to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures must be in the form of a written loan agreement that includes specified elements.
- Require that, before entering into a loan agreement, a city, county, or city and county, must find, after a public hearing, that the assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the development and that the assistance cannot be obtained on economically feasible terms in the private market.
- Make findings and declarations and additional clarifying and conforming changes to state law.
EXISTING LAW:
- Prohibits counties and general law cities from making a gift of public funds.
- Allows, generally, a city to dispose of real property in any way it chooses if doing so is for the common benefit. Allows a city to sell or lease real property for less than fair market value, without violating the constitutional prohibition against making a gift of public funds, if the sale or lease serves a public purpose.
- Requires a county to sell or lease property using a competitive sealed-bid process, as specified:
- A county board of supervisors must, by a two-thirds vote, adopt a resolution in a regular open meeting declaring its intention to sell or lease the property;
- The resolution must describe the property and the terms upon which it will be sold or leased; and,
- At least three weeks after adopting the resolution, the board must hold a public meeting at which sealed proposals to purchase or lease the property must be considered.
- Exempts a county from these requirements and allows it to sell real property at less than fair market value to provide housing that is affordable to low and moderate income residents.
AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY, this bill made various changes to provisions of law governing former redevelopment agencies (RDAs).
FISCAL EFFECT: None
COMMENTS:
- Bill Summary. This bill clarifies that a city or county may acquire, sell and lease property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity, and that such authority extends to any property and not just property that the city or county acquired from the successor agency to the redevelopment agency under the long range property management plan.
This bill is sponsored by the City of Fairfield and the League of California Cities.
- Author’s Statement. According to the author, “In 2011 the Governor and Legislature eliminated redevelopment agencies in order to provide more property tax revenues to local taxing agencies. All redevelopment agencies in the State were dissolved as of February 1, 2012.
“In 2013, the Legislature adopted SB 470 to promote economic development on a local level, to give local governments tools, at no cost to the state, that allow local governments to use their funds in a manner that promotes economic opportunity, and to provide cities, counties, and cities and counties certain powers previously afforded to redevelopment agencies that were critical to economic development.
“SB 470 declared that it is the policy of the State of California to protect and promote the sound development of economic opportunity in cities and counties. That whenever the creation of economic opportunity in cities and counties cannot be accomplished by private enterprise alone, without public participation and assistance in the acquisition of land, in planning and in the financing of land assembly, in the work of clearance, and in the making of improvements necessary therefor, it is in the public interest to advance or expend public funds for these purposes. That the creation of economic opportunity and the provisions for appropriate continuing land use and construction policies with respect to property acquired, in whole or in part, for economic opportunity constitute public uses and purposes for which public money may be advanced or expended and private property acquired, and are governmental functions of state concern in the interest of health, safety, and welfare of the people of the state and cities and counties.
- Support Arguments. Supporters argue that this bill offers communities additional tools that can be used to rehabilitate deteriorated areas, attract and retain jobs, and improve local quality of life.
- Opposition Arguments. None on file.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
City of Fairfield [SPONSOR]
League of California Cities [SPONSOR]
California Association for Local Economic Development
Cities of:
Azusa, Camarillo, Commerce, Fountain Valley, Industry, Los Alamitos, Napa, Norwalk, Redding, and Vacaville
Fairfield-Suisun Chamber of Commerce
Lystek International, Ltd.
Opposition
None on file
Analysis Prepared by: Debbie Michel / L. GOV. / (916) 319-3958
CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
CSA1 Bill Id:AB 806
Author:(Dodd)
As Amended Ver:August 8, 2016
Majority vote
ASSEMBLY: |
| (June 3, 2015) | SENATE: | 38-0 | (August 15, 2016) |
(vote not relevant)
Original Committee Reference: L. GOV.
SUMMARY: Allows all counties and cities to acquire, sell, or lease county-owned or city-owned real property to promote economic development, subject to specified requirements.
The Senate amendments strike the existing contents of the bill, and instead:
- Specify that loan agreements, sale agreements, and lease agreements that meet specified criteria are included in the statutory definition of "economic opportunity."
- Prohibit, for the purposes of specified statutes authorizing the sale, lease, or transfer of property for the creation of an economic opportunity, a city, county, or city and county from selling, leasing, or otherwise transferring, at a price that is less than fair market value, any real property that was acquired through eminent domain. Exempt from this prohibition any property that is:
- Governed by a long-range property management plan pursuant to a specified statute; and,
- A housing asset of a former redevelopment agency that is transferred to a city, county, or city and county pursuant to specified statutes, provided that the successor agency or designated local authority in the affected jurisdiction has received a finding of completion from the Department of Finance.
- Require that the creation of an economic opportunity must be subject to a specified statute that requires public agencies to disclose specified information, hold hearings and produce reports relating to economic development subsidies.
- Specify that the provisions of the bill shall be an alternative to any authority of a city, county, or city and county to create an economic opportunity or to acquire, sell, or lease property for economic development, found in the Constitution, state law, local ordinance, or charter, as specified.
- Allow a city, county, or city and county to acquire property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity, and may sell or lease property to create an economic opportunity.
- Delete statutory language that limits the authority to sell or lease city-owned or county-owned property for economic development purposes to property that is governed by a long-range property management plan, thereby allowing a city, county, or city and county to sell or lease any county-owned or city-owned property to create an economic opportunity, as defined.
- Require that a loan provided by a city or county to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures must be in the form of a written loan agreement that includes specified elements.
- Require that, before entering into a loan agreement, a city, county, or city and county, must find, after a public hearing, that the assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the development and that the assistance cannot be obtained on economically feasible terms in the private market.
- Make findings and declarations and additional clarifying and conforming changes to state law.
EXISTING LAW:
- Prohibits counties and general law cities from making a gift of public funds.
- Allows, generally, a city to dispose of real property in any way it chooses if doing so is for the common benefit. Allows a city to sell or lease real property for less than fair market value, without violating the constitutional prohibition against making a gift of public funds, if the sale or lease serves a public purpose.
- Requires a county to sell or lease property using a competitive sealed-bid process, as specified:
- A county board of supervisors must, by a two-thirds vote, adopt a resolution in a regular open meeting declaring its intention to sell or lease the property;
- The resolution must describe the property and the terms upon which it will be sold or leased; and,
- At least three weeks after adopting the resolution, the board must hold a public meeting at which sealed proposals to purchase or lease the property must be considered.
- Exempts a county from these requirements and allows it to sell real property at less than fair market value to provide housing that is affordable to low and moderate income residents.
AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY, this bill made various changes to provisions of law governing former redevelopment agencies (RDAs).
FISCAL EFFECT: None
COMMENTS:
- Bill Summary. This bill clarifies that a city, county or city and county may acquire, sell and lease property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity, and that such authority extends to any property and not just property that the city, county or city and county acquired from the successor agency to the redevelopment agency under the long range property management plan.
This bill is sponsored by the City of Fairfield.
- Author's Statement. According to the author, "In 2011 the Governor and Legislature eliminated redevelopment agencies in order to provide more property tax revenues to local taxing agencies. All redevelopment agencies in the State were dissolved as of February 1, 2012.
"In 2013, the Legislature adopted SB 470 [(Wright), Chapter 659] to promote economic development on a local level, to give local governments tools, at no cost to the state, that allow local governments to use their funds in a manner that promotes economic opportunity, and to provide cities, counties, and cities and counties certain powers previously afforded to redevelopment agencies that were critical to economic development.
"SB 470 declared that it is the policy of the State of California to protect and promote the sound development of economic opportunity in cities and counties. That whenever the creation of economic opportunity in cities and counties cannot be accomplished by private enterprise alone, without public participation and assistance in the acquisition of land, in planning and in the financing of land assembly, in the work of clearance, and in the making of improvements necessary therefor, it is in the public interest to advance or expend public funds for these purposes. That the creation of economic opportunity and the provisions for appropriate continuing land use and construction policies with respect to property acquired, in whole or in part, for economic opportunity constitute public uses and purposes for which public money may be advanced or expended and private property acquired, and are governmental functions of state concern in the interest of health, safety, and welfare of the people of the state and cities and counties."
- Support Arguments. Supporters argue that this bill offers communities additional tools that can be used to rehabilitate deteriorated areas, attract and retain jobs, and improve local quality of life.
- Opposition Arguments. None on file.
- Gut-and-Amend. The Assembly version of this bill was deleted in the Senate, and consequently, the subject matter has not been heard by an Assembly policy committee this legislative session.
Analysis Prepared by: Debbie Michel / L. GOV. / (916) 319-3958 FN: 0003809
Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | AB |
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 806
:
SENATE GOVERNANCE & FIN. COMMITTEE: 7-0, 6/15/16
AYES: Hertzberg, Nguyen, Beall, Hernandez, Lara, Moorlach, Pavley
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 79-0, 6/3/15 - See last page for vote
DIGEST: This bill allows all counties and cities to acquire, sell, or lease county-owned or city-owned real property to promote economic development, subject to specified requirements.
Senate Floor Amendments of 8/8/16 clarify that an exemption in the bill applies to former redevelopment agency housing assets that are transferred to any city or any county, not just to “a city and county.”
Senate Floor Amendments of 8/1/16 exempt specified former redevelopment agency housing assets from this bill’s prohibition against selling, leasing, or otherwise transferring, at a price that is less than fair market value, any real property that was acquired through eminent domain.
Existing law:
- Prohibits counties and general law cities from making a gift of public funds. Courts have determined that charter cities are not subject to that prohibition.
- Allows, generally, a city to dispose of real property in any way it chooses if doing so is for the common benefit. A city may sell or lease real property for less than fair market value, without violating the constitutional prohibition against making a gift of public funds, if the sale or lease serves a public purpose.
- Requires a county to sell or lease property using a competitive sealed-bid process, pursuant to specified requirements:
- A county board of supervisors must, by a two-thirds vote, adopt a resolution in a regular open meeting declaring its intention to sell or lease the property.
- The resolution must describe the property and the terms upon which it will be sold or leased.
- At least three weeks after adopting the resolution, the board must hold a public meeting at which sealed proposals to purchase or lease the property must be considered.
- Exempts a county from these requirements, and allows it to sell real property at less than fair market value, to provide housing that is affordable to low and moderate income residents.
This bill:
- Deletes statutory language that limits the authority to sell or lease city-owned or county-owned property for economic development purposes to property that is governed by a long-range property management plan. As a result, this bill allows a city, county, or city and county to sell or lease any county-owned or city-owned property to create an economic opportunity, as defined in state law.
- Allows a city, county, or city and county to acquire property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity.
- Requires that the creation of an economic opportunity must be subject to a specified statute that requires public agencies to disclose specified information, hold hearings, and produce reports relating to economic development subsidies.
- Prohibits, for the purposes of specified statutes authorizing the sale, lease, or transfer of property for the creation of an economic opportunity, a city, county, or city and county from selling, leasing, or otherwise transferring, at a price that is less than the fair market value, any real property that was acquired through eminent domain. This bill exempts from this prohibition any property that is:
- Governed by a long-range property management plan pursuant to a specified statute.
- A housing asset of a former redevelopment agency that is transferred to a city, county, or city and county pursuant to specified statutes, provided that the successor agency or designated local authority in the affected jurisdiction has received a finding of completion from the Department of Finance.
- Requires that a loan provided by a city or county to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures must be in the form of a written loan agreement that includes specified elements.
- Specifies that loan agreements, sale agreements, and lease agreements that meet specified criteria are included in the statutory definition of “economic opportunity.”
- Requires that, before entering into a loan agreement, a city, county, or city and county, must find, after a public hearing, that the assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the development and that the assistance cannot be obtained on economically feasible terms in the private market.
- Declares that:
- Specified statutes amended by this bill are an alternative to any authority of a city, county, or city and county to create an economic opportunity or to acquire, sell, or lease property for economic development, found in the Constitution, state law, local ordinance, or charter.
- Specified statutes amended by this bill do not limit or in any way affect, the application of any other such laws.
- Makes additional clarifying and conforming changes to state law.
Background
Until 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law allowed local officials to set up redevelopment agencies (RDAs), prepare and adopt redevelopment plans, and finance redevelopment activities. The Law authorized RDAs to sell or lease property without public bidding as long as the RDA provided public notice and held a public hearing. Citing a significant State General Fund deficit, Governor Brown's 2011-12 Budget proposed eliminating RDAs and returning billions of dollars of property tax revenues to schools, cities, and counties to fund core services. Among the statutory changes that the Legislature adopted to implement the 2011-12 Budget, ABX1 26 (Blumenfield, Chapter 5, Statutes of 2011 First Extraordinary Session) dissolved all RDAs. The Community Redevelopment Law specified the manner in which former RDAs could sell or lease real property. Those provisions now apply to successor agencies to redevelopment agencies. State law requires successor agencies to prepare a long-range property management plan and dispose of property under that plan.
If a successor agency has transferred property to a city or county as part of a long-range property management plan, state law allows the city or county to use alternative procedures to dispose of the property for economic development purposes (SB 470, Wright, Chapter 659, Statutes of 2013). The 2013 Wright bill also allowed a city or county to establish a program under which it loans funds to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures.
Some local officials want the Legislature to expand counties’ and general law cities statutory authority to acquire, sell, or lease public property for economic development by allowing the alternative procedures enacted by the 2013 Wright bill to be used for any city- or county-owned property.
Comments
Purpose of the bill. This bill provides cities and counties with additional flexibility to use city- or county-owned real property to fulfill economic development goals. In the wake of RDAs’ dissolution, local officials have lost many of the tools that they previously used to promote economic development within their communities. This bill restores some significant powers that cities and counties previously exercised over the acquisition and disposition of public property pursuant to provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law. This bill builds upon the provisions of SB 470 (Wright, Chapter 659, Statutes of 2013) by granting local officials authority to sell or lease any publicly owned real property at less than fair market value to create an economic opportunity. This bill will benefit communities throughout California by helping local officials get their economic development efforts back on track.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: Fiscal Com.: Local:
California Association for Local Economic Development
City of American Canyon
City of Azusa
City of Camarillo
City of Commerce
City of Fairfield
City of Fountain Valley
City of Industry
City of Napa
City of Norwalk
City of Redding
Fairfield Suisun Chamber of Commerce
League of California Cities
Lystek International, Ltd.
None received
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 79-0, 6/3/15
AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins
NO VOTE RECORDED: Harper
8/10/16 15:45:22
**** END ****
Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | AB |
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 806
:
SENATE GOVERNANCE & FIN. COMMITTEE: 7-0, 6/15/16
AYES: Hertzberg, Nguyen, Beall, Hernandez, Lara, Moorlach, Pavley
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 79-0, 6/3/15 - See last page for vote
DIGEST: This bill allows all counties and cities to acquire, sell, or lease county-owned or city-owned real property to promote economic development, subject to specified requirements.
Senate Floor Amendments of 8/1/16 exempt specified former redevelopment agency housing assets from this bill’s prohibition against selling, leasing, or otherwise transferring, at a price that is less than fair market value, any real property that was acquired through eminent domain.
Existing law:
- Prohibits counties and general law cities from making a gift of public funds. Courts have determined that charter cities are not subject to that prohibition.
- Allows, generally, a city to dispose of real property in any way it chooses if doing so is for the common benefit. A city may sell or lease real property for less than fair market value, without violating the constitutional prohibition against making a gift of public funds, if the sale or lease serves a public purpose.
- Requires a county to sell or lease property using a competitive sealed-bid process, pursuant to specified requirements:
- A county board of supervisors must, by a two-thirds vote, adopt a resolution in a regular open meeting declaring its intention to sell or lease the property.
- The resolution must describe the property and the terms upon which it will be sold or leased.
- At least three weeks after adopting the resolution, the board must hold a public meeting at which sealed proposals to purchase or lease the property must be considered.
- Exempts a county from these requirements, and allows it to sell real property at less than fair market value, to provide housing that is affordable to low and moderate income residents.
This bill:
- Deletes statutory language that limits the authority to sell or lease city-owned or county-owned property for economic development purposes to property that is governed by a long-range property management plan. As a result, this bill allows a city, county, or city and county to sell or lease any county-owned or city-owned property to create an economic opportunity, as defined in state law.
- Allows a city, county, or city and county to acquire property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity.
- Requires that the creation of an economic opportunity must be subject to a specified statute that requires public agencies to disclose specified information, hold hearings, and produce reports relating to economic development subsidies.
- Prohibits, for the purposes of specified statutes authorizing the sale, lease, or transfer of property for the creation of an economic opportunity, a city, county, or city and county from selling, leasing, or otherwise transferring, at a price that is less than the fair market value, any real property that was acquired through eminent domain. This bill exempts from this prohibition any property that is:
- Governed by a long-range property management plan pursuant to a specified statute.
- A housing asset of a former redevelopment agency that is transferred to a city, county, or city and county pursuant to specified statutes, provided that the successor agency or designated local authority in the affected jurisdiction has received a finding of completion from the Department of Finance.
- Requires that a loan provided by a city or county to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures must be in the form of a written loan agreement that includes specified elements.
- Specifies that loan agreements, sale agreements, and lease agreements that meet specified criteria are included in the statutory definition of “economic opportunity.”
- Requires that, before entering into a loan agreement, a city, county, or city and county, must find, after a public hearing, that the assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the development and that the assistance cannot be obtained on economically feasible terms in the private market.
- Declares that:
- Specified statutes amended by this bill are an alternative to any authority of a city, county, or city and county to create an economic opportunity or to acquire, sell, or lease property for economic development, found in the Constitution, state law, local ordinance, or charter.
- Specified statutes amended by this bill do not limit or in any way affect, the application of any other such laws.
- Makes additional clarifying and conforming changes to state law.
Background
Until 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law allowed local officials to set up redevelopment agencies (RDAs), prepare and adopt redevelopment plans, and finance redevelopment activities. The Law authorized RDAs to sell or lease property without public bidding as long as the RDA provided public notice and held a public hearing. Citing a significant State General Fund deficit, Governor Brown's 2011-12 Budget proposed eliminating RDAs and returning billions of dollars of property tax revenues to schools, cities, and counties to fund core services. Among the statutory changes that the Legislature adopted to implement the 2011-12 Budget, ABX1 26 (Blumenfield, Chapter 5, Statutes of 2011 First Extraordinary Session) dissolved all RDAs. The Community Redevelopment Law specified the manner in which former RDAs could sell or lease real property. Those provisions now apply to successor agencies to redevelopment agencies. State law requires successor agencies to prepare a long-range property management plan and dispose of property under that plan.
If a successor agency has transferred property to a city or county as part of a long-range property management plan, state law allows the city or county to use alternative procedures to dispose of the property for economic development purposes (SB 470, Wright, Chapter 659, Statutes of 2013). The 2013 Wright bill also allowed a city or county to establish a program under which it loans funds to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures.
Some local officials want the Legislature to expand counties’ and general law cities statutory authority to acquire, sell, or lease public property for economic development by allowing the alternative procedures enacted by the 2013 Wright bill to be used for any city- or county-owned property.
Comments
Purpose of the bill. This bill provides cities and counties with additional flexibility to use city- or county-owned real property to fulfill economic development goals. In the wake of RDAs’ dissolution, local officials have lost many of the tools that they previously used to promote economic development within their communities. This bill restores some significant powers that cities and counties previously exercised over the acquisition and disposition of public property pursuant to provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law. This bill builds upon the provisions of SB 470 (Wright, Chapter 659, Statutes of 2013) by granting local officials authority to sell or lease any publicly owned real property at less than fair market value to create an economic opportunity. This bill will benefit communities throughout California by helping local officials get their economic development efforts back on track.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: Fiscal Com.: Local:
California Association for Local Economic Development
City of American Canyon
City of Azusa
City of Camarillo
City of Commerce
City of Fairfield
City of Industry
City of Napa
City of Norwalk
City of Redding
Fairfield Suisun Chamber of Commerce
League of California Cities
Lystek International, Ltd.
None received
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 79-0, 6/3/15
AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins
NO VOTE RECORDED: Harper
8/3/16 18:43:14
**** END ****
Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | AB |
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 806
:
SENATE GOVERNANCE & FIN. COMMITTEE: 7-0, 6/15/16
AYES: Hertzberg, Nguyen, Beall, Hernandez, Lara, Moorlach, Pavley
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 79-0, 6/3/15 - See last page for vote
DIGEST: This bill allows all counties and cities to acquire, sell, or lease county-owned or city-owned real property to promote economic development, subject to specified requirements.
Existing law:
- Prohibits counties and general law cities from making a gift of public funds. Courts have determined that charter cities are not subject to that prohibition.
- Allows, generally, a city to dispose of real property in any way it chooses if doing so is for the common benefit. A city may sell or lease real property for less than fair market value, without violating the constitutional prohibition against making a gift of public funds, if the sale or lease serves a public purpose.
- Requires a county to sell or lease property using a competitive sealed-bid process, pursuant to specified requirements:
- A county board of supervisors must, by a two-thirds vote, adopt a resolution in a regular open meeting declaring its intention to sell or lease the property.
- The resolution must describe the property and the terms upon which it will be sold or leased.
- At least three weeks after adopting the resolution, the board must hold a public meeting at which sealed proposals to purchase or lease the property must be considered.
- Exempts a county from these requirements, and allows it to sell real property at less than fair market value, to provide housing that is affordable to low and moderate income residents.
This bill:
- Deletes statutory language that limits the authority to sell or lease city-owned or county-owned property for economic development purposes to property that is governed by a long-range property management plan. As a result, this bill allows a city, county, or city and county to sell or lease any county-owned or city-owned property to create an economic opportunity, as defined in state law.
- Allows a city, county, or city and county to acquire property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity.
- Requires that the creation of an economic opportunity must be subject to a specified statute that requires public agencies to disclose specified information, hold hearings, and produce reports relating to economic development subsidies.
- Prohibits, for the purposes of specified statutes authorizing the sale, lease, or transfer of property for the creation of an economic opportunity, a city, county, or city and county from selling, leasing, or otherwise transferring, at a price that is less than the fair market value, any real property that was acquired through eminent domain. This bill exempts from this prohibition any property that is governed by a long-range property management plan pursuant to a specified statute.
- Requires that a loan provided by a city or county to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures must be in the form of a written loan agreement that includes specified elements.
- Specifies that loan agreements, sale agreements, and lease agreements that meet specified criteria are included in the statutory definition of “economic opportunity.”
- Requires that, before entering into a loan agreement, a city, county, or city and county, must find, after a public hearing, that the assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the development and that the assistance cannot be obtained on economically feasible terms in the private market.
- Declares that:
- Specified statutes amended by this bill are an alternative to any authority of a city, county, or city and county to create an economic opportunity or to acquire, sell, or lease property for economic development, found in the Constitution, state law, local ordinance, or charter.
- Specified statutes amended by this bill do not limit or in any way affect, the application of any other such laws.
- Makes additional clarifying and conforming changes to state law.
Background
Until 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law allowed local officials to set up redevelopment agencies (RDAs), prepare and adopt redevelopment plans, and finance redevelopment activities. The Law authorized RDAs to sell or lease property without public bidding as long as the RDA provided public notice and held a public hearing. Citing a significant State General Fund deficit, Governor Brown's 2011-12 Budget proposed eliminating RDAs and returning billions of dollars of property tax revenues to schools, cities, and counties to fund core services. Among the statutory changes that the Legislature adopted to implement the 2011-12 Budget, ABX1 26 (Blumenfield, Chapter 5, Statutes of 2011 First Extraordinary Session) dissolved all RDAs. The Community Redevelopment Law specified the manner in which former RDAs could sell or lease real property. Those provisions now apply to successor agencies to RDAs. State law requires successor agencies to prepare a long-range property management plan and dispose of property under that plan.
If a successor agency has transferred property to a city or county as part of a long-range property management plan, state law allows the city or county to use alternative procedures to dispose of the property for economic development purposes (SB 470, Wright, Chapter 659, Statutes of 2013). The 2013 Wright bill also allowed a city or county to establish a program under which it loans funds to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures.
Some local officials want the Legislature to expand counties’ and general law cities statutory authority to acquire, sell, or lease public property for economic development by allowing the alternative procedures enacted by the 2013 Wright bill to be used for any city- or county-owned property.
Comments
Purpose of the bill. This bill provides cities and counties with additional flexibility to use city- or county-owned real property to fulfill economic development goals. In the wake of RDAs’ dissolution, local officials have lost many of the tools that they previously used to promote economic development within their communities. This bill restores some significant powers that cities and counties previously exercised over the acquisition and disposition of public property pursuant to provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law. This bill builds upon the provisions of SB 470 (Wright, 2013) by granting local officials authority to sell or lease any publicly owned real property at less than fair market value to create an economic opportunity. This bill will benefit communities throughout California by helping local officials get their economic development efforts back on track.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: Fiscal Com.: Local:
California Association for Local Economic Development
City of American Canyon
City of Azusa
City of Camarillo
City of Commerce
City of Fairfield
City of Industry
City of Napa
City of Norwalk
City of Redding
Fairfield Suisun Chamber of Commerce
League of California Cities
Lystek International, Ltd.
OPPOSITION: (Verified 6/21/16)
None received
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 79-0, 6/3/15
AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins
NO VOTE RECORDED: Harper
6/22/16 15:15:20
**** END ****
SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNANCE AND FINANCE
Senator Robert M. Hertzberg, Chair
2015 - 2016 Regular
Bill No: | AB 806 | Hearing Date: | 6/15/16 |
Author: | Dodd | Tax Levy: | No |
Version: | 6/6/16 Amended | Fiscal: | No |
Consultant: | Weinberger | ||
Community development: economic opportunity
Allows all counties and cities to acquire, sell, or lease county-owned or city-owned real property to promote economic development, subject to specified requirements.
Background
The California Constitution (Article XVI, Section Six) prohibits counties and general law cities from making a gift of public funds. Courts have determined that charter cities are not subject to that prohibition.
State law generally allows a city to dispose of real property in any way it chooses if doing so is for the common benefit. A city may sell or lease real property for less than fair market value, without violating the constitutional prohibition against making a gift of public funds, if the sale or lease serves a public purpose.
State law generally requires a county to sell or lease property using a competitive sealed-bid process. A county board of supervisors must, by a two-thirds vote, adopt a resolution in a regular open meeting declaring its intention to sell or lease the property. The resolution must describe the property and the terms upon which it will be sold or leased. At least three weeks after adopting the resolution, the board must hold a public meeting at which sealed proposals to purchase or lease the property must be considered. State law exempts a county from these requirements, and allows it to sell real property at less than fair market value, to provide housing that is affordable to low and moderate income residents.
Until 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law allowed local officials to set up redevelopment agencies (RDAs), prepare and adopt redevelopment plans, and finance redevelopment activities. The Law authorized RDAs to sell or lease property without public bidding as long as the RDA provided public notice and held a public hearing. Citing a significant State General Fund deficit, Governor Brown's 2011-12 budget proposed eliminating RDAs and returning billions of dollars of property tax revenues to schools, cities, and counties to fund core services. Among the statutory changes that the Legislature adopted to implement the 2011-12 budget, AB X1 26 (Blumenfield, 2011) dissolved all RDAs. The Community Redevelopment Law specified the manner in which former redevelopment agencies could sell or lease real property. Those provisions now apply to successor agencies to redevelopment agencies. State law requires successor agencies to prepare a long-range property management plan and dispose of property under that plan.
If a successor agency has transferred property to a city or county as part of a long-range property management plan, state law allows the city or county to use use alternative procedures to dispose of the property for economic development purposes (SB 470, Wright, 2013). The 2013 Wright bill also allowed a city or county to establish a program under which it loans funds to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures.
Some local officials want the Legislature to expand counties’ and general law cities statutory authority to acquire, sell, or lease public property for economic development by allowing the alternative procedures enacted by the 2013 Wright bill to be used for any city- or county-owned property.
Proposed Law
Assembly Bill 806 deletes statutory language that limits the authority to sell or lease city-owned or county-owned property for economic development purposes to property that is governed by a long-range property management plan. As a result, the bill allows a city, county, or city and county to sell or lease any county-owned or city-owned property to create an economic opportunity, as defined in state law.
AB 806 allows a city, county, or city and county to acquire property in furtherance of the creation of an economic opportunity.
AB 806 requires that the creation of an economic opportunity must be subject to a specified statute that requires public agencies to disclose specified information, hold hearings, and produce reports relating to economic development subsidies.
For the purposes of specified statutes authorizing the sale, lease, or transfer of property for the creation of an economic opportunity, AB 806 prohibits a city, county, or city and county from selling, leasing, or otherwise transferring, at a price that is less than the fair market value, any real property that was acquired through eminent domain. AB 806 exempts from this prohibition any property that is governed by a long-range property management plan pursuant to a specified statute.
AB 806 requires that a loan provided by a city or county to owners or tenants for the purpose of rehabilitating commercial buildings or structures must be in the form of a written loan agreement that includes:
- A payment schedule,
- The terms for interest calculation,
- The rights and remedies of the parties in the case of default, and
- Any other material terms of the loan.
AB 806 specifies that loan agreements, sale agreements, and lease agreements that meet specified criteria are included in the statutory definition of “economic opportunity.”
AB 806 requires that, before entering into a loan agreement, a city, county, or city and county, must find, after a public hearing, that the assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the development and that the assistance cannot be obtained on economically feasible terms in the private market.
The bill declares that:
- A legislative body’s determinations made pursuant to specified statutes governing the acquisition, sale, lease, or transfer of real property for the creation of an economic opportunity are final and conclusive.
- Specified statutes amended by the bill are an alternative to any authority of a city, county, or city and county to create an economic opportunity or to acquire, sell, or lease property for economic development, found in the Constitution, state law, local ordinance, or charter.
- Specified statutes amended by the bill do not limit or in any way affect, the application of any other such laws.
AB 806 makes additional clarifying and conforming changes to state law.
State Revenue Impact
No estimate.
Comments
1. Purpose of the bill. AB 806 provides cities and counties with additional flexibility to use city- or county-owned real property to fulfill economic development goals. In the wake of redevelopment agencies’ dissolution, local officials have lost many of the tools that they previously used to promote economic development within their communities. AB 806 restores some significant powers that cities and counties previously exercised over the acquisition and disposition of public property pursuant to provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law. The bill builds upon the provisions of SB 470 (Wright, 2013) by granting local officials authority to sell or lease any publicly owned real property at less than fair market value to create an economic opportunity. AB 806 will benefit communities throughout California by helping local officials get their economic development efforts back on track.
2. Accountability. State laws requiring advanced notice of a proposed sale of land owned by a county, a public hearing on the sale, a super-majority vote by county supervisors, and a competitive sealed-bid sales process are intended to protect taxpayers’ interests in publicly-owned assets. These requirements ensure that local officials dispose of publicly-owned lands transparently, with an opportunity for public input, and in a manner that maximizes the compensation the county receives. AB 806 seeks to provide transparency for the sale or lease of public property to create an economic opportunity by requiring that public officials who use the bill’s provisions must comply with notice, hearing, and reporting requirements that apply to economic development subsidies. The Committee may wish to consider whether AB 806’s broad exemption from the statutory requirements that generally govern county land sales, including the super-majority vote and sealed bidding requirements, strikes the right balance between administrative flexibility and political accountability for county property sales and leases.
3. Final and conclusive. One way that members of the public can hold public officials accountable for selling or leasing public property is by filing a lawsuit and asking a court to determine whether a sale or lease complied with relevant state laws. AB 806 requires local legislative bodies to make specified findings and determinations and, in some cases, requires that evidence be included in the public record to support their decisions. However, the bill also declares that a local legislative body’s determinations are “final and conclusive.” By including this declaration, AB 806 appears to limit judicial discretion when reviewing the validity of a local legislative body’s determinations and whatever evidence may support them. The portions of the Community Redevelopment Law that required city councils or county boards of supervisors to make similar determinations relating to the sale or lease of redevelopment property did not declare those determinations to be “final and conclusive.” The Committee may wish to consider amending AB 806 to delete the language declaring that local officials’ determinations are final and conclusive to allow for greater judicial scrutiny of actions taken under the bill’s provisions.
4. Legislative history. As passed by the Assembly, AB 806 contained provisions amending the state laws that govern the dissolution of former redevelopment agencies. The July 13, 2015 amendments deleted AB 806’s contents and inserted language relating to local government permit requirements for stand-mounted antenna. The Senate Governance & Finance Committee never heard either of those versions of the bill. The April 14, 2016 amendments deleted AB 806's contents and inserted the current language relating to local governments’ property management powers.
Assembly Actions
Not relevant to the April 14, 2016 version of the bill.
Support and Opposition
(6/9/16)
Support: California Association for Local Economic Development; Cities of American Canyon, Azusa, Camarillo, Commerce, Fairfield, Industry; Napa, Norwalk, and Redding; Fairfield Suisun Chamber of Commerce; League of California Cities; Lystek International, Ltd.
Opposition: Unknown.
-- END --
AB 806
Page 3
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
AB 806
(Dodd)
As Amended May 28, 2015
Majority vote
Committee |
Votes |
Ayes |
Noes |
Local Government |
9-0 |
Maienschein, Gonzalez, Alejo, Chiu, Cooley, Gordon, Holden, Linder, Waldron |
|
Housing |
6-0 |
Chau, Steinorth, Burke, Chiu, Beth Gaines, Lopez |
|
Appropriations |
17-0 |
Gomez, Bigelow, Bonta, Calderon, Chang, Daly, Eggman, Gallagher, Eduardo Garcia, Gordon, Holden, Jones, Quirk, Rendon, Wagner, Weber, Wood |
|
SUMMARY: Makes various changes to provisions of law governing former redevelopment agencies (RDAs). Specifically, this bill:
Allows, for oversight boards, each appointing authority identified in existing law to appoint alternate representatives to serve on the oversight board as may be necessary to attend any meeting of the oversight board in the event that the appointing authority's primary representative is unable to attend any meeting for any reason.
Provides, if the alternate representative attends any meeting in place of the primary representative, that the alternate representative shall have the same participatory and voting rights as all other attending members of the oversight board.
Requires the successor agency to promptly notify the Department of Finance (DOF) regarding the appointment of any alternate representatives to the oversight board.
Allows, if the successor agency has received a finding of completion, with the approval of the successor agency's oversight board, the successor agency to amend or modify existing, contracts and agreements, or otherwise administer projects in connection with enforceable obligations approved pursuant to existing law related to the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) approval process, including the substitution of private developer capital in a disposition and development agreement that has been deemed an enforceable obligation, if the contract, agreement, or project will not commit new property tax funds, and will not otherwise directly or indirectly reduce property tax revenues or payments made to the taxing agencies, as specified.
Allows DOF or an oversight board to require approval of a compensation agreement or agreements, as specified, prior to any transfer of property, provided, however, that a compensation agreement or agreements may be developed and executed subsequent to the approval process of a long-range property management plan.
Specifies that DOF shall only consider whether the long-range property management plan makes a good faith effort to address the requirements set forth in the existing law that specifies what the long-range property management plan shall do.
Requires DOF to approve long-range property management plans as expeditiously as possible.
Provides that actions relating to the disposition of property after approval of a long-range property management plan shall not require review by DOF.
EXISTING LAW:
Dissolves RDAs and institutes a process for winding down their activities.
Allows a city or county that authorized the creation of an RDA to elect to retain the housing assets and functions previously performed by the RDA.
Required the entity assuming the housing functions of the former RDA to submit to DOF by August 1, 2012, a list of all housing assets, as specified.
Allows the entity that assumed the housing functions to designate the use of and commit indebtedness obligation proceeds that remain after the satisfaction of enforceable obligations that have been approved in a ROPS and that are consistent with the indebtedness obligation covenants.
Requires the proceeds to be derived from indebtedness obligations that were issued for the purposes of affordable housing prior to January 1, 2011, and were backed by the Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Fund.
Requires DOF to issue a finding of completion to the successor agency, within five business days, once the following conditions have been met and verified:
The successor agency has paid the full amount as determined during the due diligence reviews and the county auditor-controller has reported those payments to DOF; and,
The successor agency has paid the full amount as determined during the July True-up process; or,
The successor agency has paid the full amount upon a final judicial determination of the amounts due and confirmation that those amounts have been paid by the county auditor-controller.
Allows the successor agency, upon receiving the finding of completion, to:
Retain dissolved RDA assets;
Place loan agreements between the former RDA and sponsoring entity on the ROPS, as an enforceable obligation, provided the oversight board makes a finding that the loan was for legitimate redevelopment purposes; and,
Utilize proceeds derived from bonds issued prior to January 1, 2011, in a manner consistent with the original bond covenants.
Requires, after DOF issues a finding of completion, the successor agency to prepare a long-range property management plan that addresses the disposition and use of the real properties of the former RDA, and requires the report to be submitted to the oversight board and DOF for approval no later than six months following the issuance to the successor agency of the finding of completion.
FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, this bill contains negligible state costs.
COMMENTS:
Bill Summary. This bill makes a number of changes to provisions of law governing former RDAs, and is an author-sponsored bill.
Author's Statement. According to the author, "Each year since the dissolution of local redevelopment agencies, the Legislature identifies relatively minor issues that require some adjustment in the dissolution statute that allows the dissolution process and its aftermath to work better, but do not change the policies established when the Legislature eliminated redevelopment agencies in the first place.
"Cleanup issues have been identified in the following areas: 1) Appointments to local dissolution oversight boards; 2) Minor modifications or amendments to existing agreements or contracts in connection with enforceable obligations; and, 3) Approval of long-range property management plans.
"This bill allows existing oversight board members to appoint alternates to the board, and allows those alternates to participate in the same manner as the primary appointee. This provision will help oversight boards to avoid unnecessary delays in their activities. AB 806 also permits amendments and changes to existing agreements and contracts after a finding of completion has been issued provided that such changes and amendments do not commit the expenditure of additional property tax revenues or reduce the distribution of such revenues to the taxing entities. This provision will permit change orders to projects currently underway without impacting the availability and distribution of property tax revenue to taxing jurisdictions.
"Finally, the bill will allow DOF to approve long-range property management plans without the consummation of compensation agreements provided that the plan addresses specified requirements relative to compiling data about the property and estimating its value. This provision will allow successor agencies to move forward with the disposition of property assets that have otherwise been held in limbo to the detriment of the taxing entities."
Previous Legislation. This bill is similar to SB 1129 (Steinberg) of 2014; however, SB 1129 was much broader in scope and contained several other sections that are not in this bill. SB 1129 was vetoed by Governor Brown.
Arguments in Support. According to the County of Santa Clara, this bill makes clarifications to the Dissolution Law in a manner that will avoid ambiguity and support the interests of all parties, including the state, local governments, and successor agencies.
Arguments in Opposition. None on file.
Analysis Prepared by: Debbie Michel / L. GOV. / (916) 319-3958 FN: 0000581
AB 806
Page 2
Date of Hearing: May 13, 2015
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Jimmy Gomez, Chair
AB 806
(Dodd) – As Amended April 6, 2015
Policy Committee: |
Local Government |
Vote: |
9 - 0 |
|
Housing and Community Development |
|
6 - 0 |
|
|
|
|
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY:
This bill specifies that agreements entered into by a former redevelopment agency (RDA) prior to June 30, 2011, to fund state highway infrastructure improvements are enforceable obligations. The bill also makes various technical changes to redevelopment dissolution law regarding appointments to local oversight boards, modifications to existing contracts, and compensation agreements as part of the approval of long-range property management plans.
FISCAL EFFECT:
Unknown, General Fund losses, perhaps in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, from specifying that RDA agreements entered into prior to June 30, 2011, that include highway improvements are enforceable obligations. Absent this bill, these revenues would be distributed to local taxing entities, including schools. Under Proposition 98, the General Fund would be required to backfill the resulting property tax losses to schools. The number of projects affected is unknown, but likely small.
COMMENTS:
Purpose. This bill continues a multi-year process to clean up lingering issues and resolve disputes regarding the redevelopment dissolution process. According to the author, “Each year, since the dissolution of local RDAs, the Legislature identifies relatively minor issues that require some adjustment in the dissolution statute that allows the dissolution process and its aftermath to work better.”
Background. In 2011, the Legislature approved and governor signed two measures, ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 that together dissolved redevelopment agencies as they existed and created a voluntary redevelopment program on a smaller scale. In response, the California Redevelopment Association, the League of California Cities and other partied, filed suit challenging the two measures. The Supreme Court denied the petition for peremptory writ of mandate with respect to ABX1 26 and granted the petition with respect to ABX1 27. As a result of the court’s decision, all redevelopment agencies were required to dissolve as of February 1. 2012 and there was no authority for any new redevelopment program.
In 2012, AB 1484 (Blumenfield), Chapter 26, made the statutory changes needed to achieve budget savings related to the dissolution of redevelopment agencies. AB 1484 clarified the process for dissolving all redevelopment agencies, made various statutory changes associated with the dissolution of redevelopment agencies, and addressed a number of substantive issues related to administrative processes, affordable housing activities, repayment of loans from communities, use of existing bond proceeds, and the disposition or retention of former redevelopment agency assets. AB 1484 specified all proceeds from bonds issued in 2011 must be defeased, the exception being if the redevelopment agency has enforceable obligations with third parties to spend the proceeds.
Addressing the Governor’s Veto. This bill is similar to SB 1129 (Steinberg) of 2014, which was vetoed by Governor Brown. Some of the provisions the Governor objected to have been removed from this bill. Others have been modified to address his concerns, including allowing the modification of existing contracts with the approval of the oversight board, and not eliminating compensation agreements altogether, but rather allowing them to be developed and executed after the approval of a long-range management plan.
However, a provision to allow the spending of 2011 bond proceeds remains in this bill. In his veto message the Governor stated, in part, “This bill allows Successor Agencies to expend revenues from bonds issues after December 2010,...Furthermore, I have already vetoed AB 2493, and this bill contains a similar provision to allow 2011 bond proceeds to be spent.”
Related Current Legislation. There are four additional bills regarding redevelopment pending in this Committee:
AB 654 (Brown) would prohibit revenues derived from a property tax rate approved by voters in a city, county, or special district to pay for the State Water Project to be allocated to the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund.
AB 974 (Bloom) would allow redevelopment successor agencies, and entities performing the housing functions of former redevelopment agencies (RDAs), to spend bond proceeds from bonds issued by former RDAs in 2011.
AB 1009 (Garcia) would allow revenues from a voter-approved pension property tax to be allocated to the city or county whose voters approved the tax.
AB 1412 (Perea) would allow for an expedited loan repayment schedule between a former RDA and a city or county, under specified conditions.
Related Prior Legislation. There have been numerous bills seeking to amend the statutes governing redevelopment dissolution. Among the most recent:
AB 1963 (Atkins) Chapter 146, Statutes of 2014, extends the date by which DOF must approve a redevelopment successor agency’s long-range management plan until January 1, 2016.
Analysis Prepared by: Jennifer Swenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081
AB 806
Page 4
Date of Hearing: April 29, 2015
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Ed Chau, Chair
AB 806
(Dodd) – As Amended April 6, 2015
SUBJECT: Redevelopment: successor agencies to redevelopment agencies
SUMMARY: Makes various changes to provisions of law governing former redevelopment agencies (RDAs). Specifically, this bill:
Allows an agreement entered into by an RDA prior to June 30, 2011, to be an enforceable obligation, if the agreement relates to state highway infrastructure improvements to which the RDA committed funds pursuant to provisions in the Community Redevelopment Law (CRL) related to property disposition, rehabilitation, and development.
Allows, for oversight boards, each appointing authority identified in existing law to appoint alternate representatives to serve on the oversight board as may be necessary to attend any meeting of the oversight board in the event that the appointing authority's primary representative is unable to attend any meeting for any reason.
Provides, if the alternate representative attends any meeting in place of the primary representative, that the alternative representative shall have the same participatory and voting rights as all other attending members of the oversight board.
Requires the successor agency to promptly notify the Department of Finance (DOF) regarding the appointment of any alternate representative to the oversight board.
Allows, if the successor agency has received a finding of completion, with the approval
of the successor agency's oversight board, the successor agency to amend or modify existing, contracts and agreements, or otherwise administer projects in connection with enforceable obligations approved pursuant to existing law related to the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) approval process, including the substitution of private developer capital in a disposition and development agreement that has been deemed an enforceable obligation,
if the contract, agreement, or project will not commit new property tax funds, and will not otherwise directly or indirectly reduce property tax revenues or payments made to the taxing agencies, as specified.
Allows DOF or an oversight board to require approval of a compensation agreement or agreements, as specified, prior to any transfer of property, provided, however, that a compensation agreement or agreements may be developed and executed subsequent to the approval process of a long-range property management plan.
Specifies that DOF shall only consider whether the long-range property management plan makes a good faith effort to address the requirements set forth in the existing law that specifies what the long-range property management plan shall do.
Requires DOF to approve long-range property management plans as expeditiously as possible.
Provides that actions relating to the disposition of property after approval of a long-range property management plan shall not require review by DOF.
EXISTING LAW:
Dissolves RDAs and institutes a process for winding down their activities.
Allows a city or county that authorized the creation of an RDA to elect to retain the housing assets and functions previously performed by the RDA.
Required the entity assuming the housing functions of the former RDA to submit to DOF by August 1, 2012, a list of all housing assets, as specified.
Allows the entity that assumed the housing functions to designate the use of and commit indebtedness obligation proceeds that remain after the satisfaction of enforceable obligations that have been approved in a ROPS and that are consistent with the indebtedness obligation covenants.
Requires the proceeds to be derived from indebtedness obligations that were issued for the purposes of affordable housing prior to January 1, 2011, and were backed by the Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Fund.
Requires DOF to issue a finding of completion to the successor agency, within five business days, once the following conditions have been met and verified:
The successor agency has paid the full amount as determined during the due diligence reviews and the county auditor-controller has reported those payments to DOF; and,
The successor agency has paid the full amount as determined during the July True-up process; or,
The successor agency has paid the full amount upon a final judicial determination of the amounts due and confirmation that those amounts have been paid by the county auditor-controller.
Allows the successor agency, upon receiving the finding of completion, to:
Retain dissolved RDA assets;
Place loan agreements between the former RDA and sponsoring entity on the ROPS, as an enforceable obligation, provided the oversight board makes a finding that the loan was for legitimate redevelopment purposes; and,
Utilize proceeds derived from bonds issued prior to January 1, 2011, in a manner consistent with the original bond covenants.
Requires, after DOF issues a finding of completion, the successor agency to prepare a long-range property management plan that addresses the disposition and use of the real properties of the former RDA, and requires the report to be submitted to the oversight board and DOF for approval no later than six months following the issuance to the successor agency of the finding of completion.
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown.
COMMENTS:
Background: In 2011, facing a severe budget shortfall, the Governor proposed eliminating RDAs in order to deliver more property taxes to other local agencies. Statewide, redevelopment redirected 12% of property taxes away from schools and other local taxing entities and into community development and affordable housing. Ultimately, the Legislature approved and the Governor signed two measures, ABX1 26 (Blumenfield), Chapter 5 and
ABX1 27 (Blumenfield), Chapter 6 that together dissolved RDAs as they existed at the time and created a voluntary redevelopment program on a smaller scale. In response the California Redevelopment Association (CRA) and the League of California Cities, along with other parties, filed suit challenging the two measures. The Supreme Court denied the petition for peremptory writ of mandate with respect to ABX1 26. However, the Court did grant CRA's petition with respect to ABX1 27. As a result, all RDAs were required to dissolve as of February 1, 2012.
This bill makes a number of changes to provisions of law governing former RDAs.
Purpose of this bill: According to the author, "Each year since the dissolution of local RDAs, the Legislature identifies relatively minor issues that require some adjustment in the dissolution statute that allows the dissolution process and its aftermath to work better, but do not change the policies established when the Legislature eliminated RDAs in the first place.
"Cleanup issues have been identified in the following areas: 1) Agreements constituting an enforceable obligation for highway infrastructure projects; 2) appointments to local dissolution oversight boards; 3) minor modifications or amendments to existing agreements or contracts in connection with enforceable obligations; and, 4) approval of long-range property management plans.
"AB 806 specifies that an enforceable obligation shall include a highway infrastructure project if a former RDA entered into an agreement for that project before a specified date. This provision resolves a dispute between the state and certain local jurisdictions.
"This bill allows existing oversight board members to appoint alternates to the board, and allows those alternates to participate in the same manner as the primary appointee. This provision will help oversight boards to avoid unnecessary delays in their activities.
"AB 806 also permits amendments and changes to existing agreements and contracts after a finding of completion has been issued provided that such changes and amendments do not commit the expenditure of additional property tax revenues or reduce the distribution of such revenues to the taxing entities. This provision will permit change orders to projects currently underway without impacting the availability and distribution of property tax revenue to taxing jurisdictions.
"Finally, the bill will allow DOF to approve long-range property management plans without the consummation of compensation agreements provided that the plan addresses specified requirements relative to compiling data about the property and estimating its value. This provision will allow successor agencies to move forward with the disposition of property assets that have otherwise been held in limbo to the detriment of the taxing entities."
Related Legislation:
SB 1129 (Steinberg) of 2014: Although similar to this bill, SB 1129 was much broader in scope and contained several other sections that are not in this bill. SB 1129 was vetoed by Governor Brown.
Double-referred: This bill was double-referred to the Committee on Local Government, where it passed 9-0 on April 15, 2015.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
California Infill Builders Federation
County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors
Opposition
None on file
Analysis Prepared by: Lisa Engel / H. & C.D. / (916) 319-2085
AB 806
Page 4
Date of Hearing: April 15, 2015
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Brian Maienschein, Chair
AB 806
(Dodd) – As Introduced February 26, 2015
SUBJECT: Redevelopment: successor agencies to redevelopment agencies.
SUMMARY: Makes various changes to provisions of law governing former redevelopment agencies (RDAs). Specifically, this bill:
Allows an agreement entered into between an RDA prior to June 30, 2011, to be an enforceable obligation, if the agreement relates to state highway infrastructure improvements to which the RDA committed funds pursuant to provisions in the Community Redevelopment Law (CRL) related to property disposition, rehabilitation and development.
Allows, for oversight boards, each appointing authority identified in existing law to appoint alternate representatives to serve on the oversight board as may be necessary to attend any meeting of the oversight board in the event that the appointing authority's primary representative is unable to attend any meeting for any reason.
Provides, if the alternate representative attends any meeting in place of the primary representative, that the alternative representative shall have the same participatory and voting rights as all other attending members of the oversight board.
Requires the successor agency to promptly notify the Department of Finance (DOF) regarding the appointment of any alternate representative to the oversight board.
Allows, if the successor agency has received a finding of completion, with the approval
of the successor agency's oversight board, the successor agency to amend or modify existing, contracts and agreements, or otherwise administer projects in connection with enforceable obligations approved pursuant to existing law related to the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) approval process, including the substitution of private developer capital in a disposition and development agreement that has been deemed an enforceable obligation,
if the contract, agreement, or project will not commit new property tax funds, and will not otherwise directly or indirectly reduce property tax revenues or payments made to the taxing agencies, as specified.
Allows DOF or an oversight board to require approval of a compensation agreement or agreements, as specified, prior to any transfer of property, provided, however, that a compensation agreement or agreements may be developed and executed subsequent to the approval process of a long-range property management plan.
Specifies that DOF shall only consider whether the long-range property management plan makes a good faith effort to address the requirements set forth in the existing law that specifies what the long-range property management plan shall do.
Requires DOF to approve long-range property management plans as expeditiously as possible.
Provides that actions relating to the disposition of property after approval of a long-range property management plan shall not require review by DOF.
EXISTING LAW:
Dissolves RDAs and institutes a process for winding down their activities.
Allows a city or county that authorized the creation of an RDA to elect to retain the housing assets and functions previously performed by the RDA.
Required the entity assuming the housing functions of the former RDA to submit to DOF by August 1, 2012, a list of all housing assets, as specified.
Allows the entity that assumed the housing functions to designate the use of and commit indebtedness obligation proceeds that remain after the satisfaction of enforceable obligations that have been approved in a ROPS and that are consistent with the indebtedness obligation covenants.
Requires the proceeds to be derived from indebtedness obligations that were issued for the purposes of affordable housing prior to January 1, 2011, and were backed by the Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Fund.
Requires DOF to issue a finding of completion to the successor agency, within five business days, once the following conditions have been met and verified:
The successor agency has paid the full amount as determined during the due diligence reviews and the county auditor-controller has reported those payments to DOF; and,
The successor agency has paid the full amount as determined during the July True-up process; or,
The successor agency has paid the full amount upon a final judicial determination of the amounts due and confirmation that those amounts have been paid by the county auditor-controller.
Allows the successor agency, upon receiving the finding of completion, to:
Retain dissolved RDA assets;
Place loan agreements between the former RDA and sponsoring entity on the ROPS, as an enforceable obligation, provided the oversight board makes a finding that the loan was for legitimate redevelopment purposes; and,
Utilize proceeds derived from bonds issued prior to January 1, 2011, in a manner consistent with the original bond covenants.
Requires, after DOF issues a finding of completion, the successor agency to prepare a long-range property management plan that addresses the disposition and use of the real properties of the former RDA, and requires the report to be submitted to the oversight board and DOF for approval no later than six months following the issuance to the successor agency of the finding of completion.
FISCAL EFFECT: This bill is keyed fiscal.
COMMENTS:
Bill Summary. This bill makes a number of changes to provisions of law governing former RDAs, and is an author-sponsored bill.
Author's Statement. According to the author, "Each year since the dissolution of local redevelopment agencies, the Legislature identifies relatively minor issues that require some adjustment in the dissolution statute that allows the dissolution process and its aftermath to work better, but do not change the policies established when the Legislature eliminated redevelopment agencies in the first place.
"Cleanup issues have been identified in the following areas: 1) Agreements constituting an enforceable obligation for highway infrastructure projects; 2) appointments to local dissolution oversight boards; 3) minor modifications or amendments to existing agreements or contracts in connection with enforceable obligations; and, 4) approval of long-range property management plans.
"AB 806 specifies that an enforceable obligation shall include a highway infrastructure project if a former redevelopment agency entered into an agreement for that project before a specified date. This provision resolves a dispute between the state and certain local jurisdictions.
"This bill allows existing oversight board members to appoint alternates to the board, and allows those alternates to participate in the same manner as the primary appointee. This provision will help oversight boards to avoid unnecessary delays in their activities.
"AB 806 also permits amendments and changes to existing agreements and contracts after a finding of completion has been issued provided that such changes and amendments do not commit the expenditure of additional property tax revenues or reduce the distribution of such revenues to the taxing entities. This provision will permit change orders to projects currently underway without impacting the availability and distribution of property tax revenue to taxing jurisdictions.
"Finally, the bill will allow DOF to approve long-range property management plans without the consummation of compensation agreements provided that the plan addresses specified requirements relative to compiling data about the property and estimating its value. This provision will allow successor agencies to move forward with the disposition of property assets that have otherwise been held in limbo to the detriment of the taxing entities."
Previous Legislation. This bill is similar to SB 1129 (Steinberg) of 2014; however, that
bill was much broader in scope and contained several other sections that are not in this bill. SB 1129 was vetoed by Governor Brown.Arguments in Support. According to the County of Santa Clara, this bill makes clarifications to the Dissolution Law in a manner that will avoid ambiguity and support the interests of all parties, including the state, local governments, and successor agencies.
Arguments in Opposition. None on file.
Double-Referral. This bill is double-referred to the Housing and Community Development Committee.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
California Infill Builders Federation
County of Santa Clara
Opposition
None on file
Analysis Prepared by: Debbie Michel / L. GOV. / (916) 319-3958
Discussed in Hearing
Assembly Floor
Senate Floor
Assembly Floor
Assembly Standing Committee on Local Government
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):