AB 2955: Traffic: Cities of Burbank, Glendale, and Los Angeles.
- Session Year: 2017-2018
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2018-09-14
Existing law generally sets forth prima facie speed limits, unless changed or otherwise authorized by law. Existing law permits local authorities to set prima facie speed limits on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey, as defined, if the different speed limit is necessary to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. Existing law authorizes the City of Norco and the common interest development of Orange Park Acres, when conducting an engineering and traffic survey, to consider equestrian safety, in addition to the specified factors set forth.
This bill would authorize the Cities of Burbank, Glendale, and Los Angeles when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan Area, the Horse Overlay Zone, and the Sylmar Community Plan Area and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Area, respectively, to each consider equestrian safety, in addition to the specified factors set forth.
This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Cities of Burbank, Glendale, and Los Angeles.
Existing law generally sets forth prima facie speed limits, unless changed or otherwise authorized by law. Existing law permits local authorities to set prima facie speed limits on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey, as defined, if the different speed limit is necessary to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. Existing law authorizes the City of Norco and the common interest development of Orange Park Acres, when conducting an engineering and traffic survey, to consider equestrian safety, in addition to the specified factors set forth.
This bill would authorize the Cities of Burbank, Glendale, and Los Angeles when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan Area, the Horse Overlay Zone, and the Sylmar Community Plan Area and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Area, respectively, to each consider equestrian safety, in addition to the specified factors set forth.
This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Cities of Burbank, Glendale, and Los Angeles.
Existing law generally sets forth prima facie speed limits, unless changed or otherwise authorized by law. Existing law permits local authorities to set prima facie speed limits on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey, as defined, if the different speed limit is necessary to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. Existing law authorizes the City of Norco and the common interest development of Orange Park Acres, when conducting an engineering and traffic survey, to consider equestrian safety, in addition to the specified factors set forth.
This bill would authorize the Cities of Burbank, Glendale, and Los Angeles when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan Area, the Horse Overlay Zone, and the Sylmar Community Plan Area and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Area, respectively, to each consider equestrian safety, in addition to the specified factors set forth.
This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Cities of Burbank, Glendale, and Los Angeles.
Existing law generally sets forth prima facie speed limits, unless changed or otherwise authorized by law. Existing law permits local authorities to set prima facie speed limits on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey, as defined, if the different speed limit is necessary to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. Existing law authorizes the City of Norco and the common interest development of Orange Park Acres, when conducting an engineering and traffic survey, to consider equestrian safety, in addition to the specified factors set forth.
This bill would authorize the City of Burbank and the City of Glendale, Cities of Burbank, Glendale, and Los Angeles when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan Area and Area, the Horse Overlay Zone, and the Sylmar Community Plan Area and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Area, respectively, to each consider equestrian safety, in addition to the specified factors set forth.
This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City of Burbank. Cities of Burbank, Glendale, and Los Angeles.
Existing law generally sets forth prima facie speed limits, unless changed or otherwise authorized by law. Existing law permits local authorities to set prima facie speed limits on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey, as defined, if the different speed limit is necessary to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. Existing law authorizes the City of Norco and the common interest development of Orange Park Acres, when conducting an engineering and traffic survey, to consider equestrian safety, in addition to the specified factors set forth.
This bill would authorize the City of Burbank and the City of Glendale, when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan area in their respective city, Area and the Horse Overlay Zone, respectively, to each consider equestrian safety, in addition to the specified factors set forth.
This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City of Burbank.
Existing law generally sets forth prima facie speed limits, unless changed or otherwise authorized by law. Existing law permits local authorities to set prima facie speed limits on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey, as defined, if the different speed limit is necessary to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. Existing law authorizes the City of Norco and the common interest development of Orange Park Acres, when conducting an engineering and traffic survey, to consider equestrian safety, in addition to the specified factors set forth.
This bill would authorize the City of Burbank, Burbank and the City of Glendale, when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan area in the their respective city, to each consider equestrian safety, in addition to the specified factors set forth.
This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City of Burbank.
Existing law generally sets forth prima facie speed limits, unless changed or otherwise authorized by law. Existing law permits local authorities to set prima facie speed limits on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey, as defined, if the different speed limit is necessary to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. Existing law authorizes the City of Norco and the common interest development of Orange Park Acres, when conducting an engineering and traffic survey, to consider equestrian safety, in addition to the specified factors set forth.
This bill would authorize the City of Burbank, when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan area in the city, to consider equestrian safety, in addition to the specified factors set forth.
This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City of Burbank.
The City of Burbank may also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan Area in the City of Burbank, as described in the City of Burbanks General Plan adopted on February 19, 2013, in addition to the factors set forth in Section 627.
SEC. 2.Section 22353.3 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:22353.3.The City of Glendale may also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Horse Overlay Zone, commonly known as the Riverside Rancho Area, in the City of Glendale, as described in Chapter 30.21 of the Glendale Municipal Code, in addition to the factors set forth in Section 627.
SEC. 3.Section 22353.4 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:22353.4.The City of Los Angeles may also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Sylmar Community Plan Area and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Area in the City of Los Angeles, as described in the Sylmar Community Plan adopted on June 10, 2015, and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Update adopted on November 18, 1997, respectively, in addition to the factors set forth in Section 627.
SEC. 4.The Legislature finds and declares that a special statute is necessary and that a general statute cannot be made applicable within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California Constitution because of the unique circumstances applicable to the Rancho Master Plan Area in the City of Burbank, the Horse Overlay Zone in the City of Glendale, and the Sylmar Community Plan Area and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Area in the City of Los Angeles, and the equestrian trails in those areas.
The City of Burbank may also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan Area in the City of Burbank, as described in the City of Burbanks General Plan adopted on February 19, 2013, in addition to the factors set forth in Section 627.
SEC. 2.Section 22353.3 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:22353.3.The City of Glendale may also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Horse Overlay Zone, commonly known as the Riverside Rancho Area, in the City of Glendale, as described in Chapter 30.21 of the Glendale Municipal Code, in addition to the factors set forth in Section 627.
SEC. 3.Section 22353.4 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:22353.4.The City of Los Angeles may also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Sylmar Community Plan Area and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Area in the City of Los Angeles, as described in the Sylmar Community Plan adopted on June 10, 2015, and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Update adopted on November 18, 1997, respectively, in addition to the factors set forth in Section 627.
SEC. 4.The Legislature finds and declares that a special statute is necessary and that a general statute cannot be made applicable within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California Constitution because of the unique circumstances applicable to the Rancho Master Plan Area in the City of Burbank, the Horse Overlay Zone in the City of Glendale, and the Sylmar Community Plan Area and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Area in the City of Los Angeles, and the equestrian trails in those areas.
The City of Burbank may also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan Area in the City of Burbank, as described in the City of Burbanks General Plan adopted on February 19, 2013, in addition to the factors set forth in Section 627.
SEC. 2.Section 22353.3 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:22353.3.The City of Glendale may also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Horse Overlay Zone, commonly known as the Riverside Rancho Area, in the City of Glendale, as described in Chapter 30.21 of the Glendale Municipal Code, in addition to the factors set forth in Section 627.
SEC. 3.Section 22353.4 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:22353.4.The City of Los Angeles may also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Sylmar Community Plan Area and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Area in the City of Los Angeles, as described in the Sylmar Community Plan adopted on June 10, 2015, and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Update adopted on November 18, 1997, respectively, in addition to the factors set forth in Section 627.
SEC. 4.The Legislature finds and declares that a special statute is necessary and that a general statute cannot be made applicable within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California Constitution because of the unique circumstances applicable only to the Rancho Master Plan Area in the City of Burbank, the Horse Overlay Zone in the City of Glendale, and the Sylmar Community Plan Area and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Area in the City of Los Angeles, and the equestrian trails in those areas.
The City of Burbank may also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan Area in the City of Burbank, as described in the City of Burbanks General Plan adopted on February 19, 2013, in addition to the factors set forth in Section 627.
SEC. 2.Section 22353.3 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:22353.3.The City of Glendale may also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Horse Overlay Zone, commonly known as the Riverside Rancho Area, in the City of Glendale, as described in Chapter 30.21 of the Glendale Municipal Code, in addition to the factors set forth in Section 627.
SEC. 3.Section 22353.4 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:22353.4.The City of Los Angeles may also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Sylmar Community Plan Area and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Area in the City of Los Angeles, as described in the Sylmar Community Plan adopted on June 10, 2015, and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Update adopted on November 18, 1997, respectively, in addition to the factors set forth in Section 627.
SEC. 3.SEC. 4.The Legislature finds and declares that a special statute is necessary and that a general statute cannot be made applicable within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California Constitution because of the unique circumstances applicable only to the Rancho Master Plan Area in the City of Burbank, the Horse Overlay Zone in the City of Glendale, and the Sylmar Community Plan Area and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Area in the City of Los Angeles, and the equestrian trails in those areas.
The City of Burbank and the City of Glendale may each also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan Area in the City of Burbank and City of Glendale, respectively, Burbank, as described in the City of Burbanks General Plan adopted on February 19, 2013, in addition to the factors set forth in Section 627.
SEC. 2.Section 22353.3 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:22353.3.The City of Glendale may also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Horse Overlay Zone, commonly known as the Riverside Rancho Area, in the City of Glendale, as described in Chapter 30.21 of the Glendale Municipal Code, in addition to the factors set forth in Section 627.
SEC. 2.SEC. 3.The Legislature finds and declares that a special statute is necessary and that a general statute cannot be made applicable within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California Constitution because of the unique circumstances applicable only to the Rancho Master Plan area Area in the City of Burbank and Burbank, the Horse Overlay Zone in the City of Glendale Glendale, and the equestrian trails there. in those areas.
The City of Burbank and the City of Glendale may each also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan Area in the City of Burbank, Burbank and City of Glendale, respectively, in addition to the factors set forth in Section 627.
SEC. 2.The Legislature finds and declares that a special statute is necessary and that a general statute cannot be made applicable within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California Constitution because of the unique circumstances applicable only to the Rancho Master Plan area in the City of Burbank and the City of Glendale and the equestrian trails there.
The City of Burbank may also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan Area in the City of Burbank, in addition to the factors set forth in Section 627.
SEC. 2.The Legislature finds and declares that a special statute is necessary and that a general statute cannot be made applicable within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California Constitution because of the unique circumstances applicable only to the Rancho Master Plan area in the City of Burbank and the equestrian trails there.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2018 | Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 398, Statutes of 2018. |
| Sep 14, 2018 | Approved by the Governor. |
| Aug 27, 2018 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m. |
| Aug 20, 2018 | Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. |
| Aug 14, 2018 | In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 16 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77. |
| Aug 13, 2018 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. |
| Aug 9, 2018 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Aug 8, 2018 | Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading. |
| Jun 13, 2018 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Jun 12, 2018 | From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 12). |
| Jun 4, 2018 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H. |
| May 30, 2018 | Referred to Com. on T. & H. |
| May 22, 2018 | In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. |
| May 21, 2018 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. |
| May 17, 2018 | Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. |
| Apr 25, 2018 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Apr 24, 2018 | From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 23). |
| Mar 20, 2018 | Re-referred to Com. on TRANS. |
| Mar 19, 2018 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended. |
| Mar 8, 2018 | Referred to Com. on TRANS. |
| Feb 17, 2018 | From printer. May be heard in committee March 19. |
| Feb 16, 2018 | Read first time. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2018 | AB 2955 FRIEDMAN Concurrence in Senate Amendments | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Aug 13, 2018 | Assembly 3rd Reading AB2955 Friedman et al. By Portantino | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Jun 12, 2018 | Do pass | Senate Standing Committee on Transportation and Housing |
Passed |
|
| May 21, 2018 | AB 2955 FRIEDMAN Assembly Third Reading | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Apr 23, 2018 | Do pass. | Assembly Standing Committee on Transportation |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| BurbankBurbank Redevelopment Agency City Of | * Support | Apr 23, 2018 |
| City Of Burbank | ** Support | Aug 10, 2018 |
| City of Glendale | ** Support | Aug 10, 2018 |
| Safer Streets LA | ** Against | Aug 10, 2018 |
| Western States Trucking Association | ** Against | Aug 10, 2018 |
CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
CSA1 Bill Id:AB 2955
Author:(Friedman)
As Amended Ver:August 8, 2018
Majority vote
ASSEMBLY: | 74-0 | (May 21, 2018) | SENATE: | 37-0 | (August 13, 2018) |
Original Committee Reference: TRANS.
SUMMARY: Authorizes the cities of Burbank and Glendale to consider equestrian safety when conducting traffic surveys and setting speed limits in the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan area in Burbank and the Horse Overlay Zone in Glendale.
The Senate amendments
- Authorize the City of Los Angeles to consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic surveys and setting speed limits within the boundaries of the Sylmar Community Plan Area and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Area of the city of Los Angeles.
- Add a co-author.
EXISTING LAW:
- Permits local authorities to conducting an engineering and traffic survey, as specified.
- Permits local authorities in the County of Orange, when conducting an engineer and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the common interest development known as Orange Park Acres, to consider equestrian safety.
- Permits local authorities in the City of Norco, when conducting an engineer and traffic survey, to consider equestrian safety.
FISCAL EFFECT: None. This bill is keyed non-fiscal by the Legislative Counsel.
COMMENTS: Setting Speed Limits: Existing law requires Caltrans, after consultation with local agencies and public hearings, to adopt rules and regulations that prescribe uniform standards and specifications for traffic control devices, including the posting of speed limits. Caltrans adopts these rules as the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), which, among other things, prescribes the process for setting speed limits in this state.
In California and elsewhere, speed limits are generally set in accordance with engineering and traffic surveys, which measure prevailing vehicular speeds and establish the limit at or near the 85th percentile (i.e., the speed that 15% of motorists exceed). California uses the 85th percentile to set speed limits except in cases where the limit is set in state law, such as the 25 mile per hour (mph) limit in residence districts and school zones, or where an engineering and traffic survey shows that other safety-related factors suggest that a lower speed limit is warranted. These safety-related factors, as prescribed by law, include accident data; highway, traffic, and roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver; residential density; and pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
Speed limits are allowed to deviate from the 85th percentile in a couple of ways. First, if 85th percentile is not in an increment of 5 mph, MUTCD requires the speed limit to be rounded to the nearest five mph limit. So if the 85th percentile is 32 mph, the speed limit can be rounded down to 30 mph. If the 85th percentile is 34 mph, it must be rounded up to 35 mph. In the first example, traffic surveyors are allowed to reduce the speed limit from 30 mph to 25 mph based on accident records, pedestrian and bicycle safety, and the density of the area. In the second example, traffic surveyors would be allowed to round down to 30 mph, but are prohibited from lowering the speed limit any further.
Existing law allows traffic surveyors to also take into account equestrian safety in the City of Norco and within the Orange Park Acres development in Orange County.
Rancho Master Plan: This bill extends to the cities of Burbank and Glendale the ability to have their traffic surveyor's also consider equestrian safety when setting speed limits in the area of the Rancho Master Plan. The Rancho Master plan is an area located in the southeast corner of Burbank. Special land use policies were adopted in 1993 to protect the unique equestrian nature of the Rancho area. The area is 10,966 acres, more than half of which is residential, commercial and industrial. While the Master Plan was never adopted, the area is still referred to as the Rancho Master Plan by the city. This bill will allow equestrian safety be considered in that area as described in the City of Burbank's General Plan adopted on February 19, 2013.
Horse Overlay Zone: Directly adjacent to the Rancho Master Plan area of Burbank is the Riverside Rancho neighborhood in Glendale. This neighborhood shares similar characteristics to the Rancho Master Plan and Glendale has zoned the area to allow for homeowners to keep horses. This bill will allow traffic surveyors to consider equestrian safety within the boundaries of the Horse Overlay Zone, as defined in the Glendale Municipal Code, Chapter 30.21.
Los Angeles: The Sylmar Community Plan Area and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Area in the City of Los Angeles are semi-rural, suburban communities in the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains
Committee Comments: While the Rancho area of Burbank and the Rancho Riverside neighborhood of Glendale are unique in their preservation of equestrian areas in an otherwise highly urban neighborhood, it is unclear as to what effect this bill would have on speed limits. The current speed limits appear to have no effect on equestrian safety, as no evidence has been provided that there has been any accidents involving horses in Burbank, and only one accident involving a horse has occurred in the City of Glendale in the last decade.
Analysis Prepared by: David Sforza / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093 FN: 0003890
Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | AB |
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 2955
: 8/8/18
SENATE TRANS. & HOUSING COMMITTEE: 12-0, 6/12/18
AYES: Beall, Cannella, Allen, Dodd, Gaines, Galgiani, McGuire, Roth, Skinner, Vidak, Wieckowski, Wiener
NO VOTE RECORDED: Morrell
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 74-0, 5/21/18 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Traffic: Cities of Burbank, Glendale, and Los Angeles
DIGEST:
This bill authorizes the City of Burbank within the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan Area, the City of Glendale within the Horse Overlay Zone, and the City of Los Angeles within the Sylmar Community Plan and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Areas, to additionally consider equestrian safety when conducting traffic surveys and setting speed limits.
Senate Floor Amendments of 8/8/18 add a coauthor to the bill.
Existing law:
- Requires the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), after consultation with local agencies and public hearings, to adopt rules and regulations prescribing uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic control devices, including, but not limited to, stop signs, yield right-of-way signs, speed restriction signs, railroad warning approach signs, street name signs, lines and markings on the roadway, and stock crossing signs.
- Requires the basis of an engineering and traffic survey to set and change certain speed limits, as specified.
- Requires an engineering and traffic survey to include, among other requirements deemed necessary by Caltrans, consideration of all of the following:
- Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.
- Accident records.
- Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
- Permits local authorities to additionally consider residential density, under specified conditions, and pedestrian and bicycle safety.
- Permits local authorities in the County of Orange, when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the common interest development known as Orange Park Acres, to additionally consider equestrian safety.
- Permits local authorities in the City of Norco, when conducting an engineering and traffic survey, to additionally consider equestrian safety.
This bill authorizes local authorities in the City of Burbank within the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan Area, the City of Glendale within the Horse Overlay Zone, and the City of Los Angeles within the Sylmar Community Plan and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Areas, to additionally consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey.
Background
In California and elsewhere, speed limits are generally set in accordance with engineering and traffic surveys, which measure the speed of free-flowing traffic and establish the limit at the 85th percentile (i.e., the speed that 15% of motorists exceed) rounded to the nearest 5 mile per hour (mph) increment. California uses the 85th percentile to set speed limits except in cases where the limit is set in state law, such as the 25 mph limit in residence districts and school zones, or where other factors suggest a change to the speed limit is warranted. These factors, as prescribed by law, include accident data, highway, traffic, and roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver, residential density, and pedestrian and bicyclist safety. These factors can only reduce or increase the speed limit by 5 mph. The Legislature has also authorized the City of Norco and Orange Park Acres to additionally consider equestrian safety as one of these factors.
Comments
- Purpose. According to the author, equestrian safety is a priority of the historic neighborhoods designated by the Rancho Master Plan Area between Burbank and Glendale, the Sylmar Community Plan and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Area in the City of Los Angeles. These adjacent communities have maintained their western heritage since early in the 20th century, and have experienced increased traffic. This has caused safety concerns for pedestrians and equestrian users within and adjacent to these communities. This bill allows these specific communities within Glendale, Burbank, and Los Angeles to set speed limits that consider equestrian safety.
- Summary of affected areas. Sylmar Community Plan Area[1] and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Area[2] in the City of Los Angeles are semi-rural, suburban communities in the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains. The Rancho Master Plan Area in the City of Burbank and the Horse Overlay Zone of Glendale are in urban neighborhoods, but have preserved equestrian areas and an extensive network of equestrian trails. Many residents in these communities ride their horses on public streets in order to access equestrian trails and areas. This bill allows these communities to additionally consider equestrian safety when doing their engineering and traffic surveys.
- Rules of the road for horseback riders. In general, horseback riders or horse drawn vehicles on public roads are subject to the rules of the road, such as obeying speed limits and traffic signals. Existing law requires motorists to drive with caution when approaching any horses on the road in order to not frighten them and to insure the safety of the riders. Local and state authorities are also allowed to designate equestrian crossings, with specified signs, in order to provide safe right-of-way.
- Impact of the bill. It is unclear as to what effect this bill would have on existing speed limits. Local authorities already have the statutory authority to identify and consider the presence of an equestrian community, under “factors not readily apparent to the driver”, in their engineering and traffic surveys. Also, the existing speed limits in the specified communities in this bill appear to have no negative impact on equestrian safety, since there have not been any reports of traffic accidents involving horses in the specified areas.
- End around to lower speed limits. The opposition to this bill is concerned that this bill may allow local authorities to circumvent current procedure and set speed limits lower than what is reasonable. The problem with setting a speed limit much lower than the 85th percentile speed is that it creates speed violators out of the majority of ‘reasonable’ drivers, potentially increasing ticketing and police contact with the motoring public. However, it is unclear whether this provision has been used to significantly decrease speed limits in the City of Norco and Orange Park Acres, where this authorization has already been given.
Related/Prior Legislation
AB 1669 (Wagner, Chapter 282, Statutes of 2014) authorized Orange County, within the common-interest development of Orange Park Acres, to also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey.
AB 2402 (Pacheco, Chapter 186, Statutes of 2002) authorized the City of Norco to also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: Fiscal Com.: Local:
City of Burbank
City of Glendale
Safer Streets LA
Western States Trucking Association
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The City of Burbank writes that “residents frequently travel through the community by horse, often traversing the same roads as vehicles. This bill will allow the City of Burbank and Glendale, when setting speed limits on the public streets within the common-interest boundaries of Rancho Master Plan, to use equestrian safety as a safety-related factor.”
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: Safer Streets LA writes that this bill “is another unnecessary step in the weakening of our speed trap protections. This legislation would make roads less safe, would be unfair to the motoring public, and would make the jobs of law enforcement officers more difficult.”
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 74-0, 5/21/18
AYES: Acosta, Aguiar-Curry, Travis Allen, Arambula, Baker, Berman, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonta, Brough, Burke, Caballero, Calderon, Carrillo, Cervantes, Chau, Chávez, Chen, Chiu, Choi, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Cunningham, Dahle, Daly, Flora, Fong, Frazier, Friedman, Gallagher, Gipson, Gloria, Gonzalez Fletcher, Grayson, Harper, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Kamlager-Dove, Kiley, Lackey, Levine, Limón, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Patterson, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Reyes, Rodriguez, Rubio, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Voepel, Waldron, Weber, Wood, Rendon
NO VOTE RECORDED: Eggman, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gray
8/10/18 11:20:11
**** END ****
Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | AB |
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 2955
:
SENATE TRANS. & HOUSING COMMITTEE: 12-0, 6/12/18
AYES: Beall, Cannella, Allen, Dodd, Gaines, Galgiani, McGuire, Roth, Skinner, Vidak, Wieckowski, Wiener
NO VOTE RECORDED: Morrell
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 74-0, 5/21/18 - See last page for vote
DIGEST:
This bill authorizes the City of Burbank within the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan Area, the City of Glendale within the Horse Overlay Zone, and the City of Los Angeles within the Sylmar Community Plan and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Areas, to additionally consider equestrian safety when conducting traffic surveys and setting speed limits.
Existing law:
- Requires the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), after consultation with local agencies and public hearings, to adopt rules and regulations prescribing uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic control devices, including, but not limited to, stop signs, yield right-of-way signs, speed restriction signs, railroad warning approach signs, street name signs, lines and markings on the roadway, and stock crossing signs.
- Requires the basis of an engineering and traffic survey to set and change certain speed limits, as specified.
- Requires an engineering and traffic survey to include, among other requirements deemed necessary by Caltrans, consideration of all of the following:
- Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.
- Accident records.
- Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
- Permits local authorities to additionally consider residential density, under specified conditions, and pedestrian and bicycle safety.
- Permits local authorities in the County of Orange, when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the common interest development known as Orange Park Acres, to additionally consider equestrian safety.
- Permits local authorities in the City of Norco, when conducting an engineering and traffic survey, to additionally consider equestrian safety.
This bill authorizes local authorities in the City of Burbank within the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan Area, the City of Glendale within the Horse Overlay Zone, and the City of Los Angeles within the Sylmar Community Plan and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Areas, to additionally consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey.
Background
In California and elsewhere, speed limits are generally set in accordance with engineering and traffic surveys, which measure the speed of free-flowing traffic and establish the limit at the 85th percentile (i.e., the speed that 15% of motorists exceed) rounded to the nearest 5 mph increment. California uses the 85th percentile to set speed limits except in cases where the limit is set in state law, such as the 25 mile per hour (mph) limit in residence districts and school zones, or where other factors suggest a change to the speed limit is warranted. These factors, as prescribed by law, include accident data, highway, traffic, and roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver, residential density, and pedestrian and bicyclist safety. These factors can only reduce or increase the speed limit by 5 mph. The Legislature has also authorized the City of Norco and Orange Park Acres to additionally consider equestrian safety as one of these factors.
Comments
- Purpose. According to the author, equestrian safety is a priority of the historic neighborhoods designated by the Rancho Master Plan Area between Burbank and Glendale, the Sylmar Community Plan and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Area in the City of Los Angeles. These adjacent communities have maintained their western heritage since early in the 20th century, and have experienced increased traffic. This has caused safety concerns for pedestrians and equestrian users within and adjacent to these communities. This bill allows these specific communities within Glendale, Burbank, and Los Angeles to set speed limits that consider equestrian safety.
- Summary of affected areas. Sylmar Community Plan Area[1] and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Area[2] in the City of Los Angeles are semi-rural, suburban communities in the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains. The Rancho Master Plan Area in the City of Burbank and the Horse Overlay Zone of Glendale are in urban neighborhoods, but have preserved equestrian areas and an extensive network of equestrian trails. Many residents in these communities ride their horses on public streets in order to access equestrian trails and areas. This bill allows these communities to additionally consider equestrian safety when doing their engineering and traffic surveys.
- Rules of the road for horseback riders. In general, horseback riders or horse drawn vehicles on public roads are subject to the rules of the road, such as obeying speed limits and traffic signals. Existing law requires motorists to drive with caution when approaching any horses on the road in order to not frighten them and to insure the safety of the riders. Local and state authorities are also allowed to designate equestrian crossings, with specified signs, in order to provide safe right-of-way.
- Impact of the bill. It is unclear as to what effect this bill would have on existing speed limits. Local authorities already have the statutory authority to identify and consider the presence of an equestrian community, under “factors not readily apparent to the driver”, in their engineering and traffic surveys. Also, the existing speed limits in the specified communities in this bill appear to have no negative impact on equestrian safety, since there have not been any reports of traffic accidents involving horses in the specified areas.
- End around to lower speed limits. The opposition to the bill is concerned that this bill may allow local authorities to circumvent current procedure and set speed limits lower than what is reasonable. The problem with setting a speed limit much lower than the 85th percentile speed is that it creates speed violators out of the majority of ‘reasonable’ drivers, potentially increasing ticketing and police contact with the motoring public. However, it is unclear whether this provision has been used to significantly decrease speed limits in the City of Norco and Orange Park Acres, where this authorization has already been given.
Related/Prior Legislation
AB 1669 (Wagner, Chapter 282, Statutes of 2014) authorized Orange County, within the common-interest development of Orange Park Acres, to also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey.
AB 2402 (Pacheco, Chapter 186, Statutes of 2002) authorized the City of Norco to also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: Fiscal Com.: Local:
City of Burbank
City of Glendale
OPPOSITION: (Verified 6/13/18)
Safer Streets LA
Western States Trucking Association
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The City of Burbank writes that “residents frequently travel through the community by horse, often traversing the same roads as vehicles. This bill will allow the City of Burbank and Glendale, when setting speed limits on the public streets within the common-interest boundaries of Rancho Master Plan, to use equestrian safety as a safety-related factor.”
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: Safer Streets LA writes that this bill “is another unnecessary step in the weakening of our speed trap protections. This legislation would make roads less safe, would be unfair to the motoring public, and would make the jobs of law enforcement officers more difficult.”
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 74-0, 5/21/18
AYES: Acosta, Aguiar-Curry, Travis Allen, Arambula, Baker, Berman, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonta, Brough, Burke, Caballero, Calderon, Carrillo, Cervantes, Chau, Chávez, Chen, Chiu, Choi, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Cunningham, Dahle, Daly, Flora, Fong, Frazier, Friedman, Gallagher, Gipson, Gloria, Gonzalez Fletcher, Grayson, Harper, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Kamlager-Dove, Kiley, Lackey, Levine, Limón, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Patterson, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Reyes, Rodriguez, Rubio, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Voepel, Waldron, Weber, Wood, Rendon
NO VOTE RECORDED: Eggman, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gray
6/13/18 17:51:25
**** END ****
SENATE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING
Senator Jim Beall, Chair
2017 - 2018 Regular
Bill No: AB 2955 Hearing Date: 6/12/2018
Author: | Friedman | ||
Version: | 6/4/2018 Amended | ||
Urgency: | No | Fiscal: | No |
Consultant: | Jeffery Song | ||
SUBJECT: Traffic: Cities of Burbank, Glendale, and Los Angeles
DIGEST: This bill would authorize the city of Burbank within the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan Area, the city of Glendale within the Horse Overlay Zone, and the city of Los Angeles within the Sylmar Community Plan and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Areas, to additionally consider equestrian safety when conducting traffic surveys and setting speed limits.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- Requires the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), after consultation with local agencies and public hearings, to adopt rules and regulations prescribing uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic control devices, including, but not limited to, stop signs, yield right-of-way signs, speed restriction signs, railroad warning approach signs, street name signs, lines and markings on the roadway, and stock crossing signs.
- Requires the basis of an engineering and traffic survey to set and change certain speed limits, as specified.
- Requires an engineering and traffic survey to include, among other requirements deemed necessary by Caltrans, consideration of all of the following:
- Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.
- Accident records.
- Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
- Permits local authorities to additionally consider residential density, under specified conditions, and pedestrian and bicycle safety.
- Permits local authorities in the County of Orange, when conducting an engineering and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the common interest development known as Orange Park Acres, to additionally consider equestrian safety.
- Permits local authorities in the City of Norco, when conducting an engineering and traffic survey, to additionally consider equestrian safety.
This bill permits local authorities in the city of Burbank within the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan Area, the city of Glendale within the Horse Overlay Zone, and the city of Los Angeles within the Sylmar Community Plan and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Areas, when conducting an engineering and traffic survey, to additional consider equestrian safety.
COMMENTS
- Purpose. According to the author, equestrian safety is a priority of the historic neighborhoods designated by the Rancho Master Plan Area between Burbank and Glendale, the Sylmar Community Plan and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Area in the City of Los Angeles. These adjacent communities have maintained their western heritage since early in the 20th century, and have experienced increased traffic. This has caused safety concerns for pedestrians and equestrian users within and adjacent to these communities. This bill allows these specific communities within Glendale, Burbank, and Los Angeles to set speed limits that consider equestrian safety.
- How Speed Limits are Set. In California and elsewhere, speed limits are generally set in accordance with engineering and traffic surveys, which measure the speed of free-flowing traffic and establish the limit at the 85th percentile (i.e., the speed that 15% of motorists exceed) rounded to the nearest 5 mph increment. California uses the 85th percentile to set speed limits except in cases where the limit is set in state law, such as the 25 mile per hour (mph) limit in residence districts and school zones, or where other factors suggest a change to the speed limit is warranted. These factors, as prescribed by law, include accident data, highway, traffic, and roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver, residential density, and pedestrian and bicyclist safety. These factors can only reduce or increase the speed limit by 5 mph. This bill would add equestrian safety as one of these factors, for specified areas in the cities of Burbank, Glendale, and Los Angeles, similar to what has been done in prior legislation for the city of Norco and Orange Park Acres.
- Summary of Affected Areas. Sylmar Community Plan Area[1] and the Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan Area[2] in the City of Los Angeles are semi-rural, suburban communities in the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains. The Rancho Master Plan Area in the City of Burbank and the Horse Overlay Zone of Glendale are in urban neighborhoods, but have preserved equestrian areas and an extensive network of equestrian trails. Many residents in these communities ride their horses on public streets in order to access equestrian trails and areas. This bill allows these communities to additionally consider equestrian safety when doing their engineering and traffic surveys.
- Rules of the Road for Horseback Riders. In general, horseback riders or horse drawn vehicles on public roads are subject to the rules of the road, such as obeying speed limits and traffic signals. Existing law requires motorists to drive with caution when approaching any horses on the road in order to not frighten them and to insure the safety of the riders. Local and state authorities are also allowed to designate equestrian crossings, with specified signs, in order to provide safe right-of-way.
- Impact of the Bill. It is unclear as to what effect this bill would have on existing speed limits. Local authorities also already have the statutory authority to identify and consider the presence of an equestrian community, under “factors not readily apparent to the driver”, in their engineering and traffic surveys. Also, the current speed limits in the specified communities in this bill appear to have no negative impact on equestrian safety, since there have not been any reports of traffic accidents involving horses in the specified areas.
- End Around to Lower Speed Limits. The opposition to the bill is concerned that this bill may allow local authorities to circumvent current procedure and set speed limits lower than what is reasonable. The problem with setting speed limits much lower than the 85th percentile is that it creates speed violators out of the majority of ‘reasonable’ drivers, potentially increasing ticketing and police contact with the motoring public. However, there are no reports that similar provisions given to the city of Norco or Orange Park Acres have significantly lowered the speed limits in those areas.
Related Legislation:
AB 2402 (Pacheco, Chapter 186, Statutes of 2002) — allowed the City of Norco to also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey.
AB 1669 (Wagner, Chapter 282, Statutes of 2014) — allowed Orange County, within the common-interest development of Orange Park Acres, to also consider equestrian safety when conducting an engineering and traffic survey.
Assembly Votes:
Floor: 74-0
Trans: 14-0
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: Fiscal Com.: Local:
POSITIONS: (Communicated to the committee before noon on Wednesday,
June 6, 2018.)
SUPPORT:
City of Burbank
City of Glendale
OPPOSITION:
Western States Trucking Association
-- END --
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
ATR Bill Id:AB 2955
Author:(Friedman)
As Amended Ver:May 17, 2018
Majority vote
Committee | Votes | Ayes | Noes |
Transportation | 14-0 | Frazier, Fong, Aguiar-Curry, Baker, Berman, Chu, Daly, Friedman, Gipson, Harper, Mathis, Medina, Nazarian, O'Donnell |
SUMMARY: Authorizes the cities of Burbank and Glendale to consider equestrian safety when conducting traffic surveys and setting speed limits in the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan area in Burbank and the Horse Overlay Zone in Glendale.
EXISTING LAW:
- Permits local authorities to conducting an engineering and traffic survey, as specified.
- Permits local authorities in the County of Orange, when conducting an engineer and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the common interest development known as Orange Park Acres, to consider equestrian safety.
- Permits local authorities in the City of Norco, when conducting an engineer and traffic survey, to consider equestrian safety.
COMMENTS:
Setting Speed Limits: Existing law requires Caltrans, after consultation with local agencies and public hearings, to adopt rules and regulations that prescribe uniform standards and specifications for traffic control devices, including the posting of speed limits. Caltrans adopts these rules as the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), which, among other things, prescribes the process for setting speed limits in this state.
In California and elsewhere, speed limits are generally set in accordance with engineering and traffic surveys, which measure prevailing vehicular speeds and establish the limit at or near the 85th percentile (i.e., the speed that 15% of motorists exceed). California uses the 85th percentile to set speed limits except in cases where the limit is set in state law, such as the 25 mile per hour (mph) limit in residence districts and school zones, or where an engineering and traffic survey shows that other safety-related factors suggest that a lower speed limit is warranted. These safety-related factors, as prescribed by law, include accident data; highway, traffic, and roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver; residential density; and pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
Speed limits are allowed to deviate from the 85th percentile in a couple of ways. First, if 85th percentile is not in an increment of 5 mph, MUTCD requires the speed limit to be rounded to the nearest 5 mph limit. So if the 85th percentile is 32 mph, the speed limit can be rounded down to 30 mph. If the 85th percentile is 34 mph, it must be rounded up to 35 mph. In the first example, traffic surveyors are allowed to reduce the speed limit from 30 mph to 25 mph based on accident records, pedestrian and bicycle safety, and the density of the area. In the second example, traffic surveyors would be allowed to round down to 30 mph, but are prohibited from lowering the speed limit any further.
Existing law allows traffic surveyors to also take into account equestrian safety in the City of Norco and within the Orange Park Acres development in Orange County.
Rancho Master Plan: This bill extends to the cities of Burbank and Glendale the ability to have their traffic surveyor's also consider equestrian safety when setting speed limits in the area of the Rancho Master Plan. The Rancho Master plan is an area located in the southeast corner of Burbank. Special land use policies were adopted in 1993 to protect the unique equestrian nature of the Rancho area. The area is 10,966 acres, more than half of which is residential, commercial and industrial. While the Master Plan was never adopted, the area is still referred to as the Rancho Master Plan by the city. This bill will allow equestrian safety be considered in that area as described in the City of Burbank's General Plan adopted on February 19, 2013.
Horse Overlay Zone: Directly adjacent to the Rancho Master Plan area of Burbank is the Riverside Rancho neighborhood in Glendale. This neighborhood shares similar characteristics to the Rancho Master Plan and Glendale has zoned the area to allow for homeowners to keep horses. This bill will allow traffic surveyors to consider equestrian safety within the boundaries of the Horse Overlay Zone, as defined in the Glendale Municipal Code, Chapter 30.21.
Committee comments: While the Rancho area of Burbank and the Rancho Riverside neighborhood of Glendale are unique in their preservation of equestrian areas in an otherwise highly urban neighborhood, it is unclear as to what effect this bill would have on speed limits. The current speed limits appear to have no effect on equestrian safety, as no evidence has been provided that there has been any accidents involving horses in Burbank, and only one accident involving a horse has occurred in the City of Glendale in the last decade.
Please see the policy committee analysis for full discussion of this bill
Analysis Prepared by: David Sforza / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093 FN: 0002934
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
ATR Bill Id:AB 2955
Author:(Friedman)
As Amended Ver:March 19, 2018
Majority vote
Committee | Votes | Ayes | Noes |
Transportation | 14-0 | Frazier, Fong, Aguiar-Curry, Baker, Berman, Chu, Daly, Friedman, Gipson, Harper, Mathis, Medina, Nazarian, O'Donnell |
SUMMARY: Authorizes the cities of Burbank and Glendale to consider equestrian safety when conducting traffic surveys and setting speed limits in the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan area.
EXISTING LAW:
- Permits local authorities to conducting an engineering and traffic survey, as specified.
- Permits local authorities in the County of Orange, when conducting an engineer and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the common interest development known as Orange Park Acres, to consider equestrian safety.
- Permits local authorities in the City of Norco, when conducting an engineer and traffic survey, to consider equestrian safety.
COMMENTS:
Setting Speed Limits: Existing law requires Caltrans, after consultation with local agencies and public hearings, to adopt rules and regulations that prescribe uniform standards and specifications for traffic control devices, including the posting of speed limits. Caltrans adopts these rules as the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), which, among other things, prescribes the process for setting speed limits in this state.
In California and elsewhere, speed limits are generally set in accordance with engineering and traffic surveys, which measure prevailing vehicular speeds and establish the limit at or near the 85th percentile (i.e., the speed that 15% of motorists exceed). California uses the 85th percentile to set speed limits except in cases where the limit is set in state law, such as the 25 mile per hour (mph) limit in residence districts and school zones, or where an engineering and traffic survey shows that other safety-related factors suggest that a lower speed limit is warranted. These safety-related factors, as prescribed by law, include accident data; highway, traffic, and roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver; residential density; and pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
Speed limits are allowed to deviate from the 85th percentile in a couple of ways. First, if 85th percentile is not in an increment of five mph, MUTCD requires the speed limit to be rounded to the nearest five mph limit. So if the 85th percentile is 32 mph, the speed limit can be rounded down to 30 mph. If the 85th percentile is 34 mph, it must be rounded up to 35 mph. In the first example, traffic surveyors are allowed to reduce the speed limit from 30 mph to 25 mph based on accident records, pedestrian and bicycle safety, and the density of the area. In the second example, traffic surveyors would be allowed to round down to 30 mph, but are prohibited from lowering the speed limit any further.
Existing law allows traffic surveyors to also take into account equestrian safety in the City of Norco and within the Orange Park Acres development in Orange County.
Rancho Master Plan: This bill extends to the cities of Burbank and Glendale the ability to have their traffic surveyor's also consider equestrian safety when setting speed limits in the area of the Rancho Master Plan. The Rancho Master plan is an area located in the southeast corner of Burbank. Special land use policies were adopted in 1993 to protect the unique equestrian nature of the Rancho area. The area is 10,966 acres, more than half of which is residential, commercial and industrial. The city of Burbank never adopted the Master Plan, but special land use policies were put into effect to preserve and protect the existing equestrian character of the Rancho area. The Master Plan was intended to have a Neighborhood Protection Plan to deal with traffic impacts and mitigation.
It is unclear at this time what parts of Glendale would be affected by this bill, as the Rancho Master Plan, which was never adopted, is located exclusively in Burbank. Nonetheless, Glendale, writing in support, states that "Having the ability to consider equestrian safety as a safety-related factor in order to decrease posted speed limits in the Rancho area of Glendale will help protect the unique equestrian nature of the area, as many of our residents travel through the neighborhood by horse, often traversing the same roads as vehicles."
Committee comments: While the Rancho area of Burbank and the Rancho Riverside neighborhood of Glendale are unique in their preservation of equestrian areas in an otherwise highly urban neighborhood, it is unclear as to what effect this bill would have on speed limits. The current speed limits appear to have no effect on equestrian safety, as no evidence has been provided that there has been any accidents involving horses in Burbank, and only one accident involving a horse has occurred in the City of Glendale in the last decade.
While the author wishes to extend the provisions of this bill to the parts of Glendale where the accident occurred, the provision limiting this bill's application to the Rancho Master Plan may prevent that from happening. Further, because the Rancho Master Plan was never adopted by Burbank, it is unclear what areas of Burbank would be covered as well. This could lead to a challenge of any speed limit reduced for this reason.
Please see the policy committee analysis for full discussion of this bill.
Analysis Prepared by: David Sforza / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093 FN: 0002730
Date of Hearing: April 23, 2018
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
Jim Frazier, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 2955 (
Author:Friedman) – As Amended Ver:March 19, 2018
SUBJECT: Traffic: City of Burbank and City of Glendale
SUMMARY: Authorizes the cities of Burbank and Glendale to consider equestrian safety when conducting traffic surveys and setting speed limits in the boundaries of the Rancho Master Plan area.
EXISTING LAW:
- Requires the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), after consultation with local agencies and public hearings, to adopt rules and regulations prescribing uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic control devices, including, but not limited to, stop signs, yield right-of-way signs, speed restriction signs, railroad warning approach signs, street name signs, lines and markings on the roadway, and stock crossing signs.
- Requires an engineering and traffic survey to include, among other requirements deemed necessary by Caltrans, consideration of all of the following:
- Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements;
- Accident records; and,
- Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
- Permits local authorities to additionally consider all of the following when conducting an engineering and traffic survey:
- Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
- Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures;
- Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures; or,
- The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either of the above.
- Pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
- Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
- Permits local authorities in the County of Orange, when conducting an engineer and traffic survey of the public streets within the boundaries of the common interest development known as Orange Park Acres, to consider equestrian safety.
- Permits local authorities in the City of Norco, when conducting an engineer and traffic survey, to consider equestrian safety.
FISCAL EFFECT: None, this bill is keyed non-fiscal by the Legislative Counsel.
COMMENTS:
Setting Speed Limits: Existing law requires Caltrans, after consultation with local agencies and public hearings, to adopt rules and regulations that prescribe uniform standards and specifications for traffic control devices, including the posting of speed limits. Caltrans adopts these rules as the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), which, among other things, prescribes the process for setting speed limits in this state.
In California and elsewhere, speed limits are generally set in accordance with engineering and traffic surveys, which measure prevailing vehicular speeds and establish the limit at or near the 85th percentile (i.e., the speed that 15% of motorists exceed). California uses the 85th percentile to set speed limits except in cases where the limit is set in state law, such as the 25 mile per hour (mph) limit in residence districts and school zones, or where an engineering and traffic survey shows that other safety-related factors suggest that a lower speed limit is warranted. These safety-related factors, as prescribed by law, include accident data; highway, traffic, and roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver; residential density; and pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
Speed limits are allowed to deviate from the 85th percentile in a couple of ways. First, if 85th percentile is not in an increment of 5 mph, MUTCD requires the speed limit to be rounded to the nearest 5 mph limit. So if the 85th percentile is 32 mph, the speed limit can be rounded down to 30 mph. If the 85th percentile is 34 mph, it must be rounded up to 35 mph. In the first example, traffic surveyors are allowed to reduce the speed limit from 30 mph to 25 mph based on accident records, pedestrian and bicycle safety, and the density of the area. In the second example, traffic surveyors would be allowed to round down to 30 mph, but are prohibited from lowering the speed limit any further.
Existing law allows traffic surveyors to also take into account equestrian safety in the City of Norco and within the Orange Park Acres development in Orange County.
Rancho Master Plan: This bill extends to the cities of Burbank and Glendale the ability to have their traffic surveyor’s also consider equestrian safety when setting speed limits in the area of the Rancho Master Plan. The Rancho Master plan is an area located in the southeast corner of Burbank. Special land use policies were adopted in 1993 to protect the unique equestrian nature of the Rancho area. The area is 10,966 acres, more than half of which is residential, commercial and industrial. The city of Burbank never adopted the Master Plan, but special land use policies were put into effect to preserve and protect the existing equestrian character of the Rancho area. The Master Plan was intended to have a Neighborhood Protection Plan to deal with traffic impacts and mitigation.
It is unclear at this time what parts of Glendale would be affected by this bill, as the Rancho Master Plan, which was never adopted, is located exclusively in Burbank. Nonetheless, Glendale, writing in support, states that “Having the ability to consider equestrian safety as a safety-related factor in order to decrease posted speed limits in the Rancho area of Glendale will help protect the unique equestrian nature of the area, as many of our residents travel through the neighborhood by horse, often traversing the same roads as vehicles.”
Committee comments: While the Rancho area of Burbank and the Rancho Riverside neighborhood of Glendale are unique in their preservation of equestrian areas in an otherwise highly urban neighborhood, it is unclear as to what effect this bill would have on speed limits. The current speed limits appear to have no effect on equestrian safety, as no evidence has been provided that there has been any accidents involving horses in Burbank, and only one accident involving a horse has occurred in the City of Glendale in the last decade.
While the author wishes to extend the provisions of this bill to the parts of Glendale where the accident occurred, the provision limiting this bill’s application to the Rancho Master Plan may prevent that from happening. Further, because the Rancho Master Plan was never adopted by Burbank, it is unclear what areas of Burbank would be covered as well. This could lead to a challenge of any speed limit reduced for this reason. The author may wish to better clarify what portions of Burbank and Glendale should be covered by this proposal.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
City of Burbank
City of Glendale
Opposition
Safer Streets L.A.
Western States Trucking Association
Analysis Prepared by: David Sforza / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093
Discussed in Hearing
Assembly Floor
Senate Floor
Senate Standing Committee on Transportation and Housing
Assembly Floor
Assembly Floor
Assembly Standing Committee on Transportation
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):