AB 1533: Public contracts: local agencies: preferences.
- Session Year: 2019-2020
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2019-07-01
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2019 | Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 49, Statutes of 2019. |
| Jul 1, 2019 | Approved by the Governor. |
| Jun 25, 2019 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11 a.m. |
| Jun 20, 2019 | In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling. |
| Jun 20, 2019 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0.). |
| Jun 17, 2019 | Ordered to special consent calendar. |
| Jun 6, 2019 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Jun 5, 2019 | From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 5). |
| May 16, 2019 | Referred to Com. on GOV. & F. |
| May 2, 2019 | In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. |
| May 2, 2019 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. |
| Apr 25, 2019 | Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 23). |
| Mar 14, 2019 | Referred to Com. on J., E.D., & E. |
| Feb 25, 2019 | Read first time. |
| Feb 23, 2019 | From printer. May be heard in committee March 25. |
| Feb 22, 2019 | Introduced. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2019 | Special Consent AB1533 | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Jun 5, 2019 | Do pass | Senate Standing Committee on Governance and Finance |
Passed |
|
| May 2, 2019 | AB 1533 Eggman Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Apr 23, 2019 | Do pass. To Consent Calendar. | Assembly Standing Committee on Jobs, Economic Development, and the Economy |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | AB 1533 |
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 1533
Introduced: 2/22/19
SENATE GOVERNANCE & FIN. COMMITTEE: 7-0, 6/5/19
AYES: McGuire, Moorlach, Beall, Hertzberg, Hurtado, Nielsen, Wiener
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 76-0, 5/2/19 (Consent) - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Public contracts: local agencies: preferences
DIGEST:
This bill allows local agencies in San Joaquin County to offer contracting preferences for disabled veteran business enterprises (DVBEs) and social enterprises.
Existing law:
- Designates the Department of General Servoces as the administrator of the state Small Business Procurement and Contract Act, which includes certifying and implementing targeted preference programs for certified small businesses, microbusinesses, and DVBEs.
- Authorizes a local agency to facilitate competitively bid contract awards to small businesses by doing all of the following:
- Establish a small business preference for use in construction contracts, the procurement of goods, or the delivery of services, as specified.
- Set a percent and financial value of each preference. The maximum percentage of a preference is limited to 7% of the lowest responsible bidder meeting specifications, and the maximum financial value is $150,000 for any bid.
- Establish a small business subcontracting procurement goal and a small business preference which can be applied to contracts that include a certain percentage of small businesses.
- Require bidders to make good faith efforts to meet the small business subcontracting participation goal, and to demonstrate what actions the bidder took in making the good faith efforts to meet the goal.
- Authorize a prime contractor, subject to the approval of the local agency, to substitute a small business subcontractor with another small business. Among other specified limitations, all conditions qualifying the substitution are required to be verified by the local agency with the subcontractor being replaced.
- Set additional guidelines for local preferences, including defining the term “small business” to the extent that the definition includes all state certified small businesses.
- Authorizes a local agency within 11 of the state’s 58 counties (including Alameda, Contra Costa, Lake, Los Angeles, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, and Sonoma) to offer construction contracting preferences to DVBEs or social enterprises, subject to specified procedures, including to:
- Establish a procurement preference for disabled veteran business participation and/or social enterprise participation for use in construction contracts, the procurement of goods, or the delivery of services, as specified.
- The maximum percentage of a preference is limited to 7% of the lowest responsible bidder meeting specifications, and the maximum financial value is $150,000 for any bid.
- If the local agency is allowing more than one preference to be used in a single bid, the local agency is required to set the percentage and maximum financial value of the combined preferences. The maximum percentage of all combined preferences – including those for DVBEs, small businesses, and social enterprises– is 15% of the lowest responsible bidder, and the maximum combined financial value of all preferences is $200,000.
- Set additional guidelines for local preferences, including:
- Defining the term “disabled veteran business” to the extent that the definition includes all state certified DVBEs.
- Defining a “social enterprise” to include a nonprofit or for-profit business whose primary purpose is to benefit the economic, environmental, or social health of the community and which uses the methods and disciplines of business and the power of the marketplace to advance its social, environmental, and human justice agendas, wherein the organization applies commercial strategies to maximize improvements in human and environmental well-being that may include maximizing social impact rather than profits for external shareholders.
- Establish a procurement preference for disabled veteran business participation and/or social enterprise participation for use in construction contracts, the procurement of goods, or the delivery of services, as specified.
A “social enterprise” is a business that has been in operation for at least one year providing transitional or permanent employment to a transitional workforce or providing social, environmental, or human justice services.
- Requires every local agency that offers any of the preferences to, prior to offering a preference, adopt a procurement policy that includes specified contents.
This bill adds local agencies within the County of San Joaquin to the existing 11 counties that can offer the contracting preferences for DVBEs and social enterprises.
Background
Current law generally requires state agencies and local governments to award public contracts to the lowest responsible bidder. State law also allows local agencies to require that contracts be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder who meets goals for contract participation by minority business enterprises and women business enterprises. If a bidder doesn't meet the local agencies' goals, the agency must evaluate the bidder's good faith efforts to meet those goals.
Last year, the Legislature approved AB 2762 (Carrillo, Chapter 654, Statutes of 2018) to authorize local agencies in 11 counties to offer preferences to DVBEs and social enterprises.
Comments
- Purpose of the bill. According to the author, “In 2018, AB 2762 (Carrillo) was chaptered and established a bid preference program for social enterprises, small businesses, and disabled veteran business enterprises, by increasing the minimum preference in bidding from 5% to 7%. Preferences are capped at 15% if a business qualifies for more than one preference category and applies to construction, procurement of goods, or delivery of services. The program is scheduled to sunset on January 1, 2024. AB 1533 would authorize San Joaquin County to join the bid-preference program – opening the door for social enterprises, small businesses and disabled veteran business enterprises to deepen their positive societal and economic impacts in the region.”
- Too soon? When the Legislature enacted AB 2762, it approved the bill as a pilot program to allow future review of whether local agency preference programs had given rise to the same concerns as the state’s DVBE program. AB 1533 seeks to expand this pilot program to local agencies in an additional county less than a year after AB 2762 went into effect. Accordingly, it is unclear whether enough time has elapsed for any issues with these preferences to manifest themselves and whether the Legislature has adequate information to evaluate the program. To minimize the chance that local agencies will adopt problematic programs, the Legislature may wish to consider amending AB 1533 to narrow the bill to only grant new authority to those jurisdictions that are specifically interested in using it.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No Local: No
Associated Builders and Contractors Northern California Chapter
City of Stockton
Ready To Work
None received
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 76-0, 5/2/19
AYES: Aguiar-Curry, Bauer-Kahan, Berman, Bigelow, Bloom, Boerner Horvath, Bonta, Brough, Burke, Calderon, Carrillo, Cervantes, Chau, Chen, Chiu, Choi, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Cunningham, Dahle, Daly, Diep, Eggman, Flora, Fong, Frazier, Friedman, Gabriel, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gloria, Gonzalez, Gray, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Kamlager-Dove, Kiley, Lackey, Levine, Limón, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Patterson, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Robert Rivas, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Salas, Santiago, Smith, Mark Stone, Ting, Voepel, Waldron, Weber, Wicks, Wood, Rendon
NO VOTE RECORDED: Arambula, Grayson, Mullin, Quirk
Prepared by: Anton Favorini-Csorba / GOV. & F. / (916) 651-4119
6/7/19 12:30:09
**** END ****
SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNANCE AND FINANCE
Senator Mike McGuire, Chair
2019 - 2020 Regular
Bill No: | AB 1533 | Hearing Date: | 6/5/19 |
Author: | Eggman | Tax Levy: | No |
Version: | 2/22/19 | Fiscal: | No |
Consultant: | Favorini-Csorba | ||
Public contracts: local agencies: preferences
Allows local agencies in San Joaquin County to offer contracting preferences for disabled veteran business enterprises and social enterprises.
Background
Current laws generally require state agencies and local governments to award public contracts to the lowest responsible bidder. State law also allows local agencies to require that contracts be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder who meets goals for contract participation by minority business enterprises and women business enterprises. If a bidder doesn't meet the local agencies' goals, the agency must evaluate the bidder's good faith efforts to meet those goals.
When the voters passed Proposition 209 (1996), they constitutionally banned discrimination or preferential treatment based on race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in public employment, public education, or public contracting. Lawmakers responded with legislation allowing agencies to engage in public sector outreach programs, including recruitment of minority groups and women (SB 44, Polanco, 1999). Governor Davis vetoed that bill, saying that it violated Proposition 209, but appointed a 28-member Governor's Task Force on Diversity and Outreach to examine ways of conducting constitutionally permissible outreach programs. The Task Force's August 2000 report offered a list of legislative, budgetary, and administrative options. According to the Task Force, “most of the businesses adversely impacted by Proposition 209 were minority businesses and women-owned businesses. The vast majority of these businesses are, in fact, small businesses.”
Responding to the Task Force’s recommendations, the Legislature revised the existing Small Business Procurement and Contract Act in several ways (AB 1084, Wesson, 2001). Among other things, the Small Business Procurement and Contract Act permits local agencies to depart from the requirement to award contracts to the lowest responsible bidder by providing a 5 percent preference for small businesses in contracts for construction, goods, or services. Under this preference, bids from small businesses are reduced by the percentage of the preference multiplied by the lowest bid that the local agency receives—effectively lowering the price of a bid for purposes of awarding a contract. This preference can be extended to bidders that use small business contractors, and local governments can require bidders to make, and provide evidence of, good faith efforts to meet a subcontracting participation goal for small business contracts, as well as setting additional guidelines for local preference purposes. By focusing the preference on small businesses generally, these laws dodge the constitutional prohibitions in Proposition 209.
The Small Business Procurement and Contract Act also mandates that state agencies offer a similar small business preference of 5 percent, establish goals for the participation of small businesses in contracting, and offer a preference to disabled veteran business enterprises (DVBEs). The Act defines “small business” and DVBE and directs the Department of General Services (DGS) to certify and maintain a list of eligible small businesses and DVBEs. However, local agencies can also promulgate their own definitions of small business. In 2012, the Legislature updated the Small Business Procurement and Contracting Act to align local agency procurement programs with the state's certified small business program in order to ensure that small businesses that were currently certified by the state under the program would be assured of eligibility to engage in procurement activities with local agencies (AB 1783, Perea, 2012).
For the purposes of the Small Business Procurement and Contract Act, a small business is a company with 100 or fewer employees and fewer than $15 million in average annual gross receipts, among other conditions. The DGS director can increase the gross receipts threshold to account for inflation every two years.
DVBE Audit. The state’s contracting preference programs are not without controversy. After years of concerns being raised by veterans and others over the policy, the State Auditor issued a report on the state’s DVBE preference program in February 2014. Among other findings, the State Auditor noted that:
- The state's current method of measuring the success of the DVBE program may distort an assessment of whether the program is meeting the legislative intent;
- Only a relatively small subset of DVBE firms enjoy the major part of the State's business—during fiscal year 2012-13, 83 percent of the DVBE contract award amounts went to only 30 DVBE firms; and
- The DGS has not provided clear guidance as to what level of support and documentation is sufficient to support their reported DVBE performance data nor how to report DVBE participation on multiyear contracts.
Local solicitation preference programs. Los Angeles County (LA County) procures approximately $6.5 billion in contracts annually and has established several local preference programs. Specifically, in 2016, LA County adopted the Small Business, Disabled Veteran-Owned Business, and Social Enterprise Utilization Plan to support businesses that promote a positive social, public health, and environmental impact. LA County currently provides contract preferences for small businesses, DVBEs, and social enterprises of up to 15 percent, unless precluded by state or federal law. The LA County Preference Program is designed to enhance participation of DVBEs, small businesses, and social enterprises in county purchasing and contracting.
LA County establishes qualifications for businesses to participate, including that:
- Small businesses must have a principal place of business located in LA County for at least the previous 12 months and be certified as such by either DGS or the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority and fall under specified revenue thresholds and employee count qualifications; and
- DVBEs must be certified as such by either DGS or the U.S Department of Veterans Affairs.
Social enterprises must have its Principal Place of Business or major office located in LA County and meet one of the following criteria:
- Have been in operation for at least one year providing transitional or permanent jobs and/or job training, skill building, and access to supportive services to a Transitional Workforce or employing at least 51% of a Transitional Workforce;
- Be incorporated as a Benefit Corporation or Social Purpose Corporation with the State of California;
- Be certified as a B-Corporation by B-Labs;
- Be certified "Green" by a city government located within LA County; or
- Have as its primary purpose the common good, as demonstrated through a published mission statement, and a principal business activity that is directly related to accomplishing that stated social mission.
However, generally state law limits local contracting preferences outside of the small business context to non-construction contracts. Accordingly, local governments cannot offer these contracting preferences on construction contracts.
AB 2762 (Carrillo, 2018). To allow some counties to offer additional preferences, the Legislature enacted AB 2762 (Carrillo, 2018). AB 2762 created two additional categories of preferences that local governments may offer when procuring contracts: DVBEs and social enterprises. These preferences may be applied to contracts for construction, the procurement of goods, or the delivery of services. Local agencies offering a preference to small businesses, DVBEs, and social enterprises must define eligibility for a preference and must include in that eligibility those businesses that meet specified definitions in law. AB 2762 defined DVBEs to match the state definition and required social enterprises to meet criteria similar to LA County’s program.
AB 2762 also increased, from 5 percent to 7 percent of the lowest responsible bidder, the maximum value of a single preference for small businesses and extended this maximum value to DVBEs and social enterprises. However, local governments cannot provide a single preference that exceeds $100,000 for any bid. If a contractor qualifies for multiple preferences—for example, as both a small business and a DVBE—local agencies can grant multiple preferences for a bid, up to a total preference of 15 percent of the lowest responsible bidder and no more than $200,000.
Local agencies that want to grant DVBE and social enterprise preferences must adopt a procurement policy that includes, among other things:
- The percentage and maximum financial value of a single preference, as well as multiple preferences if the program allows for multiple preferences;
- A requirement that a preference only be awarded to a small business, DVBE, or social enterprise that performs a commercially useful function, as defined;
- A policy to exercise oversight and prevent fraud; and
- If the local agency offers a preference for social enterprise participation, a certification process for social enterprises.
To mitigate some of the concerns that arose around the state’s DVBE, the Legislature limited AB 2762 in two ways. First, the DVBE and social enterprise preference authorization sunsets on January 1, 2024. Second, only local agencies within 11 counties are eligible to offer the preferences established by AB 2762: Alameda, Contra Costa, Lake, Los Angeles, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, and Sonoma.
The author wants the Legislature to allow local agencies within the County of San Joaquin to also offer these preferences.
Proposed Law
Assembly Bill 1533 adds local agencies in the County of San Joaquin to the local agencies that can offer greater preferences when awarding construction contract preferences for small businesses, along with preferences for DVBEs and social enterprises.
State Revenue Impact
No estimate.
Comments
1. Purpose of the bill. According to the author, “In 2018, AB 2762 (Carrillo) was chaptered and established a bid preference program for social enterprises, small businesses, and disabled veteran business enterprises, by increasing the minimum preference in bidding from 5% to 7%. Preferences are capped at 15% if a business qualifies for more than one preference category and applies to construction, procurement of goods, or delivery of services. The program is scheduled to sunset on January 1, 2024. AB 1533 would authorize San Joaquin County to join the bid-preference program – opening the door for social enterprises, small businesses and disabled veteran business enterprises to deepen their positive societal and economic impacts in the region.”
2. Too soon? When the Legislature enacted AB 2762, it approved the bill as a pilot program to allow future review of whether local agency preference programs had given rise to the same concerns as the state’s DVBE program. AB 1533 seeks to expand this pilot program to local agencies in an additional county less than a year after AB 2762 went into effect. Accordingly, it is unclear whether enough time has elapsed for any issues with these preferences to manifest themselves and whether the Legislature has adequate information to evaluate the program. To minimize the chance that local agencies will adopt problematic programs, the Committee may wish to consider amending AB 1533 to narrow the bill to only grant new authority to those jurisdictions that are specifically interested in using it.
Assembly Actions
Assembly Jobs, Economic Development, and the Economy Committee: 7-0
Assembly Floor: 76-0
Support and Opposition
(5/31/19)
Support: Association Builders and Contractors Northern California Chapter; Ready to Work; City of Stockton.
Opposition: Unknown.
-- END --
Date of Hearing: April 23, 2019
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JOBS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AND THE ECONOMY
Sabrina Cervantes, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 1533 (
Author:Eggman) – As Introduced Ver:February 22, 2019
SUBJECT: Public contracts: local agencies: preferences
POLICY FRAME: While California's overall economic growth has consistently outpaced that of most areas of the nation, individuals that live in some regions of the state and those that belong to certain population groups still face recession-related poor economic conditions. Business ownership among minorities and especially women of color is one policy path that has demonstrated the ability to support upward mobility and economic security. With net new job growth highest among businesses with less than 20 employees, supporting small business results in multiple positive outcomes for addressing the systemic challenges of income inequality.
A growing number of local agencies are seeking ways to leverage their public procurement expenditures to support local small business development. Legislation enacted last year, AB 2762 (Carrillo and Muratsuchi), Chapter 654, Statutes of 2018, established special procurement policies for local agencies in 11 of the state’s 58 counties. When the measure passed the Assembly Jobs Committee, AB 2762 applied to all counties in the state. Senate committee amendments limited the bill to the 11 Bay Area counties and Los Angeles, the sponsor of the bill.
AB 1533 expands the special procurement provisions to San Joaquin County in order to assist local agencies within the county in increasing the number of small businesses, disabled veteran-owned businesses, and social enterprises participating in public contracting.
The policy committee analysis includes information on the California small business economy; the public procurement process, including how bid preferences are used in evaluating bids; and the rise of new forms of businesses, such as social enterprises.
SUMMARY: AB 1533 expands the number of counties authorized to use the enhanced procurement preference provisions from 11 to 12 by adding San Joaquin County to the list of eligible areas.
EXISTING LAW:
- Authorizes a local agency to facilitate competitively bid contract awards to small businesses by doing all of the following:
- Establish a small business preference for use in construction contracts, the procurement of goods, or the delivery of services, as specified.
- Set a percent and financial value of each preference. The maximum percentage of a preference is limited to 7% of the lowest responsible bidder meeting specifications, and the maximum financial value is $150,000 for any bid.
- Establish a small business subcontracting procurement goal and a small business preference which can be applied to contracts that include a certain percentage of small businesses.
- Require bidders to make good faith efforts to meet the small business subcontracting participation goal, and to demonstrate what actions the bidder took in making the good faith efforts to meet the goal.
- Authorize a prime contractor, subject to the approval of the local agency, to substitute a small business subcontractor with another small business. Among other specified limitations, all conditions qualifying the substitution are required to be verified by the local agency with the subcontractor being replaced.
- Set additional guidelines for local preferences, including defining the term “small business” to the extent that the definition includes all state certified small businesses.
- Authorizes a local agency within 11 of the state’s 58 counties (including Alameda, Contra Costa, Lake, Los Angeles, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, and Sonoma) to facilitate competitively bid contract awards with disabled veteran business or social enterprise participation by doing all of the following:
- Establish a procurement preference for disabled veteran business participation and/or social enterprise participation for use in construction contracts, the procurement of goods, or the delivery of services, as specified.
- The maximum percentage of a preference is limited to 7% of the lowest responsible bidder meeting specifications, and the maximum financial value is $150,000 for any bid.
- If the local agency is allowing more than one preference to be used in a single bid, the local agency is required to set the percentage and maximum financial value of the combined preferences. The maximum percentage of all combined preferences – including those for disabled veteran business, small business, and social enterprise participation – is 15% of the lowest responsible bidder, and the maximum combined financial value of all preferences is $200,000.
- Establish a subcontracting preference for contracts which include a certain percentage of disabled veteran businesses or social enterprises.
- Require bidders to make good faith efforts to meet the disabled veteran business or social enterprise subcontracting participation goal, and to demonstrate what actions the bidder took in making the good faith efforts to meet the goal.
- Authorize a prime contractor, subject to the approval of the local agency, to substitute a subcontractor with another disabled veteran business or social enterprise, as applicable. Among other limitations, all conditions qualifying the substitution are required to be verified by the local agency with the subcontractor being replaced.
- Set additional guidelines for local preferences, including:
- Defining the term “disabled veteran business” to the extent that the definition includes all state certified disabled veteran business enterprises (DVBEs).
- Defining a “social enterprise” to include a nonprofit or for-profit business whose primary purpose is to benefit the economic, environmental, or social health of the community and which uses the methods and disciplines of business and the power of the marketplace to advance its social, environmental, and human justice agendas, wherein the organization applies commercial strategies to maximize improvements in human and environmental well-being that may include maximizing social impact rather than profits for external shareholders.
- Establish a procurement preference for disabled veteran business participation and/or social enterprise participation for use in construction contracts, the procurement of goods, or the delivery of services, as specified.
A “social enterprise” is a business that has been in operation for at least one year providing transitional or permanent employment to a transitional workforce or providing social, environmental, or human justice services.
- Requires every local agency that offers any of the preferences to, prior to offering a preference, adopt a procurement policy that includes, at a minimum, all of the following:
- A definition of an eligible entity for each preference category being utilized by the local agency.
- The percentage and maximum financial value of a single preference.
- If the local agency is authorized to offer and intends to allow multiple preferences in a bid package, the percentage and maximum financial value of multiple preferences in a bid package.
- A requirement that a preference only be awarded to a small business, disabled veteran business, or social enterprise, as applicable, that performs a commercially useful function, as defined.
- A policy regarding oversight and potential fraudulent behavior on the part of a contractor, subcontractor, or other individual for the purpose of qualifying for a preference.
- If the local agency is authorized to offer and intends to implement a preference for social enterprise participation, a certification process for social enterprises, as defined.
- A policy for determining whether a contractor has made a good faith effort, as specified.
- Policy on how a prime contractor may substitute a subcontractor, as specified, including, but not limited to, a requirement that construction subcontractors be afforded all the protections of the Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act, as specified, and that substitution of a social enterprise or small business may only be made due to the subcontractor’s inability to execute the contract due to staffing or scheduling conflicts that have arisen since the submittal of the bid. All conditions qualifying the substitution are required to be verified with the subcontractor being replaced.
- Designates DGS as the administrator of the state Small Business Procurement and Contract Act (Small Business Procurement Act), which includes certifying and implementing targeted preference programs for certified small businesses, microbusinesses, and disabled veteran business enterprises (DVBEs). For the purposes of state contracting, the following definitions apply:
- A “small business” is an independently owned enterprise that is not dominant in its field of operation, is domiciled in California, has a principle office in California, employs 100 or fewer employees, and has average annual gross receipts of $15 million or less over the previous three years.
- A DVBE is a business certified as being a sole proprietorship, corporation, or partnership with its home office located in the U.S. and which is not a branch or subsidiary of a foreign corporation, foreign firm, or other foreign-based business. In addition, a DVBE meets all of the following:
- The disabled veteran is a veteran of the military, naval, or air service of the U.S., including, but not limited to, the Philippine Commonwealth Army, the Regular Scouts, “Old Scouts,” the Special Philippine Scouts, “New Scouts,” and those who have at least a 10% service-connected disability and are domiciled in the state.
- The management and control of the daily business operations are by one or more disabled veterans. The disabled veterans who exercise management and control are not required to be the same disabled veterans as the owners of the business.
- The DVBE’s ownership of the business meets the following criteria:
- If the DVBE is a sole proprietorship, it is at least 51% owned by one or more disabled veterans.
- If the DVBE is a publicly owned business, at least 51% of its stock is unconditionally owned by one or more disabled veterans.
- If the DVBE is a subsidiary, it is wholly owned by a parent corporation, but only if at least 51% of the voting stock of the parent corporation is unconditionally owned by one or more disabled veterans.
- If the DVBE is a joint venture, it is an entity in which at least 51% of the joint venture’s management, control, and earnings are held by one or more disabled veterans.
FISCAL EFFECT: None
COMMENTS & CONTEXT:
- Expands on 2018 Legislation: Legislation enacted last year, AB 2762 (Carrillo and Muratsuchi), Chapter 654, Statutes of 2018, established special procurement policies for local agencies in 11 of the state’s 58 counties. When the measure passed the Assembly Jobs Committee, AB 2762 applied to all counties in the state. Senate committee amendments limited the bill to the 11 Bay Area counties and Los Angeles County, who was the sponsor of the bill. Repeated requests to the Chair of Senate Governance and Finance Committee to expand the number of counties authorized to use the enhanced provisions were denied.
AB 1533 expands the authority to use the special procurement provisions to San Joaquin County. More specifically, this bill authorizes the use of two additional preference categories and increases the value of the existing preferences for contract bids that include certified small businesses, disabled veteran businesses, and social enterprises.
In order to implement these new preferences and increased preference values, the bill requires the local agency to establish a targeted procurement policy that reflects best public procurement practices, including policies that:
- Address potentially fraudulent behavior on the part of a contractor, subcontractor, or other individual committed for the purpose of qualifying for a preference;
- Provide a process for determining whether a bidder has made a good faith effort to meet a procurement participation goal;
- Require that substitutions of subcontractors only occur in instances where the qualifying conditions have been verified by a local agency; and
- Require that any contractor or subcontractor that is used to meet a preference serves a commercially useful function, as defined.
- Growing Income Inequality: While California’s dominance in innovation-based industries is unquestionable, the divide between the middle and lower income households and the top income earners is accelerating. Even as California’s unemployment is at historic lows, unemployment within certain geographic regions and population groups remains significantly higher, as does the number of people in the state who are not participating within the core economy.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, California’s poverty rate is 14.3% as compared to a national rate of 13.4%. Using the federal Supplemental Poverty Measure, which accounts for geographic differences, transfer payments, and out-of-pocket expenses, 19% of California residents live in poverty, as compared to 14.1% nationally averaged from 2015 to 2017. Significant contributing factors to these poverty rates are education and basic skill deficits experienced by many Californians from rural and inner city areas and other historically underserved population groups, as well as those who are more recently encountering employment challenges, including returning veterans.
A review of the February 2019 unemployment numbers illustrates this expanding pattern of economic disparity between regions and population groups in California. Chart 1 – Selected Data on Unemployment shows unemployment-related information by selected counties and population groups.
Chart 1 – Selected Data on Unemployment | ||||||
Unemployment Rate February 2019 (not seasonally adjusted) | Unemployment Rate February 2018 (not seasonally adjusted) | Unemployment Rate February 2019 (12-month moving average) | Unemployment Rate | |||
California | 4.4% | 4.6% | California | 4.2% | 4.7 % | |
Colusa County | 20.5% | 19.2% | Blacks | 6.5% | 6.8 % | |
Imperial County | 17.4% | 16.5% | Hispanics | 5.1% | 5.5% | |
Los Angeles County | 4.2% | 4.7% | Whites | 4.1% | 4.7 % | |
Riverside County | 4.5% | 4.6% | 16 to 19 year olds | 14.9% | 17.3% | |
Sacramento County | 4.1% | 4.1% | 20 to 24 year olds | 7.4% | 7.4 % | |
San Bernardino County | 4.2% | 4.3% | 25 to 34 year olds | 4.4% | 5.0% | |
San Luis Obispo County | 3.2% | 3.2% | **The Employment Development Department reports a February 2019 labor participation rate (LPR) of 62.2%, representing 11.7 million people in California who were not participating in the workforce. The LPR for veterans is 44.9%, as opposed to a nonveterans LPR of 66.0%. | |||
San Mateo County | 2.3% | 2.4% | ||||
Tulare County | 11.3% | 11.4% | ||||
Source: www.edd.ca.gov | ||||||
The data shows income disparities are increasing, which is impacting a range of economic and societal issues. California is not unique in experiencing a rise in income inequality. National data shows that while the top 1% of income households were significantly impacted by the recession, by 2017, annual revenues had risen to the highest levels ever. Between 1979 and 2017, the income for the top 1% of income households cumulatively rose by 157%.
In February 2019, California’s seasonally adjusted unemployment rate was 4.2%. For comparison purposes, Chart 1 uses data not seasonally adjusted for county and uses a 12-month moving average for demographic data. While the state’s not seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for February 2019 was 4.4%, some areas of the state had lower rates and others had considerably higher. San Mateo County recorded the lowest at 2.3%, while Colusa County experienced the highest unemployment rate at 20.5% and Imperial County the second highest at 17.4%. Under the provisions of the federal Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, an area of substantial unemployment is considered any contiguous area within a state with an unemployment rate above 6.5%. California had 23 counties which experienced unemployment rates at or above 6.5% in February 2019. There were four counties, all in the Bay Area, with unemployment rates below 3%.
Looking more specifically at different population groups, the data also shows the disparities between the statewide rate of 4.2% and the rates of key subgroups, including unemployment among Blacks and Hispanics being 6.5% and 5.1% respectively. For the youngest members of the workforce, obtaining quality jobs remains a significant issue, with unemployment among 16 to 19 year olds and 20 to 24 year olds being well above the state average, ranging from 14.9% to 7.4% respectively. According to the February 2019 figures, 11.7 million people in California are not participating in the labor force, an increase of 29,000 individuals during a 12-month period.
- The Role of Small Businesses within the California Economy: California’s dominance in many economic areas is based, in part, on the significant role small businesses play in the state’s $2.7 trillion economy. Two separate studies, one by the U.S. Census Bureau and another by the Kaufman Foundation, found that net job growth was strongest among businesses with less than 20 employees. Among other advantages, small businesses are crucial in the state’s international competitiveness and are an important means for dispersing the positive economic impacts of trade within the California economy.
In 2016 (most recent data), of the 4.2 million establishments in California, there were 3.2 million nonemployer establishments as compared to 922,000 employer establishments. The top three industry sectors with the largest number of nonemployer sole proprietorships included professional, scientific, and technical services (507,000 establishments); transportation and warehousing (297,000); and real estate and rentals (271,000). Total establishments revenues for nonemployer sole proprietorships, across all industry sectors, were $113 billion in receipts in 2016. As these non-employer businesses grow, they continue to serve as an important component of California’s dynamic economy.
Excluding sole proprietorships, businesses with less than 20 employees comprise over 88.3% of all businesses and employ approximately 18.2% of all workers. Businesses with less than 100 employees represent 97.3% of all businesses and employ 35.8% of the workforce. These non-employer and small employer firms create jobs, generate taxes, support important industry sectors, and revitalize communities. Since the recession, these businesses have become increasingly important because they are more flexible and well-suited to meet niche foreign and domestic market needs.
However, their small size also results in certain market challenges, including having difficulty in meeting the procedural requirements of the state’s complex regulatory structure and the traditional credit and collateral requirements of mainstream financial institutions. Specialized technical assistance, access to credit enhancements, and targeting of state procurement activities help many small businesses overcome or at least minimize these difficulties.
- Small Business Procurement and Contract Act: California has a 40 year history of utilizing state contracting to support business development within targeted business populations. Statute sets an annual 3% DVBE procurement participation goal, and a 2006 executive order sets a 25% small business and microbusiness participation goal for state agencies, departments, boards, and commissions.
While encouraging small business participation furthers the state’s interest in having a robust small business sector, the Small Business Procurement and Contract Act also establishes the policy foundation for DVBE contract participation. The DVBE procurement program is intended to both recognize the sacrifices of California's disabled military veterans, as well as address the unique needs of disabled veterans seeking rehabilitation and training through entrepreneurship.
To assist state agencies in reaching these targeted procurement participation goals, state law authorizes a procurement preference for bids using a certified small business or DVBE as a prime or subcontractor and a streamlined alternative procurement process for smaller size contracts (between $5,000 and $250,000) whereby an awarding department can contract directly with a certified small business or DVBE after comparing the bid against two other similar businesses.
The state also administers a DVBE incentive which allows an awarding department to set an incentive percentage for a particular transaction based upon the department’s business strategy to achieve their annual 3% DVBE procurement participation goal. Awarding departments are also required to recognize a 5% preference in cases where a bid includes a certified small business.
Similar to the procurement laws state agencies follow, local agencies are also authorized to offer procurement preferences, including preferences of up to 7% or $150,000 for contracts which have small business or disabled veteran business participation. As noted in a prior comment, some local agencies have authority to offer higher value preferences, allow more than one preference in a single bid package, and include preferences for additional types of businesses and organizations.
In the state's experience, a majority of DVBEs are smaller size firms, with 75.4% having dual certifications as a DVBE and microbusiness and 9.6% having dual certifications as a DVBE and small business. The remaining 15% of DVBEs operate with only a single DVBE certification.
- New Forms of Business: Demographic and economic shifts are giving rise to new forms of business development and new types of working relationships between owners, employees, contractors, and other businesses. AB 1533 proposes to expand the authority for local agencies to set procurement participation goals and offer financial preferences for bids to those that include a social enterprise. The following is some preliminary research on this emerging form of "business."
Among other models, the social enterprise model combines entrepreneurial activity with a social purpose. Because they prioritize social impact over the need to maximize profit for owners or shareholders, a growing number of public entities are looking into how the model could be used in their communities to tackle what had previously been considered intractable problems.
To date, much of the work has been at the pilot level, but outcomes seem to be promising. One study by Mathematica, a U.S. based research firm, looked at the outcomes from seven social enterprise programs assisting 282 workers. As part of the same study, Mathematica also undertook a comparative analysis of workforce outcomes for 154 social enterprise workers and 37 eligible workers who were not hired at a social enterprise. According to the report, the results suggest that “social enterprises may help workers gain employment and move toward economic self-sufficiency and life stability; however, the impact-study results are inconclusive, in part because of the small samples.”
Another recent study by Social Ventures in Australia found that social enterprises have demonstrated that they can create jobs for people excluded from the mainstream workforce, particularly the long-term unemployed, and showed that this equity outcome is also efficient, as government investment in the creation of businesses is returned via taxation revenue and savings in social security expenditure. These findings are similar to the Mathematica study, which also found that the percentage of total income from government transfers decreased from 71% to 24% and that total monthly income for the workers increased by 91%.
The European Union regularly measures the economic impact of this evolving area of businesses' development and reports that the "social economy" employs over 11 million people in the EU, accounting for 6% of total employment.
- Related Legislation: Below is a list of related legislation.
- AB 415 (Chiu) Employment Social Enterprise: This bill authorizes the California Department of Social Services to contract with employment social enterprises to provide CalFresh Employment and Training services. The bill also authorizes a county to contract with an employment social enterprise and designated intermediary to provide services to its CalFresh Employment and Training Program participants. Status: Signed by the Governor, Chapter 340, Statutes of 2017.
- AB 1084 (Wesson) Small Businesses and Microbusinesses: This bill establishes a subcategory of small businesses called microbusinesses and establishes a 5% small business preference for state and local agencies. The bill also allows for a non-small business to receive the preference when subcontracting to small businesses, as specified. Status: Signed by the Governor, Chapter 882, Statutes of 2001.
- AB 1125 (Weber) Small Business Preference: This bill would have increased the maximum financial value of an individual bid preference from $50,000 to $100,000 and increased the maximum value of multiple preferences from $100,000 to $150,000. Status: Held in the Senate Committee on Appropriations, 2015.
- AB 1783 (Perea) State Certified Small Businesses and Local Contracting: This bill aligns local agency procurement programs with the state's certified small business program in order to ensure that small businesses that were currently certified by the state to do contracting would be assured of being eligible to engage in procurement activities with local agencies. Status: Signed by the Governor, Chapter 114, Statutes of 2012.
- AB 2726 (Carrillo and Muratsuchi) Enhanced Local Procurement: This bill increases the maximum value of a small business procurement preference used by a local agency when awarding a contract based on the lowest responsible bidder from 5% to 7% and sets a maximum financial value of $150,000, as specified. In addition, the bill authorizes, effective January 1, 2019, through January 1, 2024, a specified local agency to establish a disabled veteran business preference and a social enterprise preference for use in a public contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. When more than one preference is applied to a bid package, the bill sets a maximum percentage value of multiple preferences at no more than 15% of the lowest responsible bidder and a maximum financial value of multiple preferences at no more than $200,000. These provisions only apply to a public contract awarded by a local agency within Los Angeles County and the Bay Area, as specified. Status: Signed by the Governor, Chapter 654, Statutes of 2018.
- AB 2022 (Medina) Target Area Contract Preference Act: This bill modifies the Target Area Contract Preference Act by redefining what qualifies as an economically distressed area. Specifically, a "distressed area" is in the top quartile of census tracts for having the highest unemployment and poverty in the state as determined by the Department of Finance. Status: Signed by the Governor, Chapter 780, Statutes of 2014.
- SB 21 (Evan) Eliminates Good Faith Effort: This bill requires awarding departments to award contracts to the lowest responsible bidder meeting specific statewide goals for disabled veteran business enterprise participation, instead of only requiring awarding department to make a good faith effort to do so. The bill also requires state agencies to report to DGS and the Legislature on the impacts upon outreach efforts and the actual awarding of contracts to bidders meeting the statewide participation goals following the elimination of the demonstration of good faith effort as a means to meet state DVBE contracting goals. Status: Signed by the Governor, Chapter 19, Statutes of 2009, Fourth Extraordinary Session.
- SB 1219 (Hancock) Social Enterprise Preference: This bill would have authorized a 5% employment social enterprise preference for bid packages applying for a state contract, including a contract with the California State University. This is an identical provision to the small business and microbusiness preference: a single preference which may not exceed $50,000, or, when added to other preferences, the total value cannot exceed $100,000. Status: Vetoed by the Governor in 2016. The Governor's veto message stated: "SB 1219 establishes a new procurement preference for employment social enterprises. While the goal of these bills are well-intentioned, the implementation of these bills require an expensive modification to FI$Cal at a time when the state must focus its resources on the project's successful deployment."
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
City of Stockton
Ready to Work
Opposition
None on File
Analysis Prepared by: Toni Symonds / J., E.D., & E. / (916) 319-2090
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):