AB 309: Vehicles that appear to be used by law enforcement: ownership or operation by public historical society or museum.
- Session Year: 2019-2020
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2019-09-06
Existing law generally prohibits a person from owning or operating a vehicle that resembles a law enforcement vehicle, with various exceptions that include using a vehicle exclusively for movie or television production with signs stating movie car prominently on the doors.
This bill would additionally exclude from these prohibitions a vehicle that is in the possession of a federal, state, or local historical society or museum that is open to the public and secured and operated with specified restrictions.
(a)When a motor vehicle, painted, as required by Section 40800, and formerly used in the enforcement of the provisions of Division 10 (commencing with Section 20000) or 11 (commencing with Section 21000), is sold to any person and is used for purposes other than law enforcement, the vehicle shall be painted or partially painted by the seller or agency formerly using such vehicle so that it will no longer resemble a vehicle complying with Section 40800 and any insignia or other marking of the vehicle identifying it as a traffic law enforcement vehicle shall be removed by the seller or agency formerly using such vehicle before it shall be operated on any street or highway, other than to have the vehicle moved to be painted or to a place of storage.
(b)This section shall not apply to former law enforcement vehicles, without insignia, which are painted one solid color, or which are used exclusively for movie or television production and display signs stating movie car prominently on the doors, or which are motorcycles, as defined in Section 400, without insignia.
(c)This section shall not apply to a vehicle, if all of the following conditions are satisfied:
(1)The vehicle is possessed by a federal, state, or local historical society or museum that is open to the public.
(2)The vehicle is secured from unauthorized operation.
(3)The vehicle is not operated on any public road or highway, unless one of the following applies:
(A)The vehicle is being operated within a temporary street closure for the purposes of celebrations, parades, local special events, and other purposes when the operation is approved by local authorities having jurisdiction over the street closure.
(B)The vehicle is of a model year of at least twenty-five years prior to the year of operation.
SEC. 2.Section 27605 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:27605.(a)No person shall own or operate a motor vehicle painted in the manner described in Section 40800 to resemble a motor vehicle used by a peace officer or traffic officer on duty for the primary purpose of enforcing the provisions of Division 10 (commencing with Section 20000) or Division 11 (commencing with Section 21000) pursuant to Section 40800.
(b)This section shall not apply to vehicles which are painted one solid color or to vehicles first registered on or before January 1, 1979. These provisions shall not apply to vehicles that are any of the following:
(1)Owned by vehicle manufacturers or dealers.
(2)Used by law enforcement agencies in the enforcement of the provisions of Division 10 (commencing with Section 20000) or Division 11 (commencing with Section 21000).
(3)Owned by persons or companies who use the vehicles exclusively for movie or television production and display signs stating movie car prominently on the doors.
(4)Owned by persons or companies who use the vehicles exclusively for funeral escort purposes.
(5)Motorcycles, as defined in Section 400, without insignia.
(c)This section shall not apply to a vehicle, if all of the following conditions are satisfied:
(1)The vehicle is possessed by a federal, state, or local historical society or museum that is open to the public.
(2)The vehicle is secured from unauthorized operation.
(3)The vehicle is not operated on any public road or highway, unless one of the following applies:
(A)The vehicle is being operated within a temporary street closure for the purposes of celebrations, parades, local special events, and other purposes when the operation is approved by local authorities having jurisdiction over the street closure.
(B)The vehicle is of a model year of at least twenty-five years prior to the year of operation.
SEC. 3.Section 27606 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:27606.(a)No person shall own or operate a motor vehicle which is equipped with a light bar, or facsimile thereof, to resemble a motor vehicle used by a peace officer or traffic officer while on duty within that jurisdiction for the primary purpose of enforcing Division 10 (commencing with Section 20000) or Division 11 (commencing with Section 21000) pursuant to Section 40800.
(b)For purposes of this section the following definitions apply:
(1)A light bar means any light or device affixed to or mounted upon the roof of a vehicle and extending the width of the roof, or a substantial portion thereof, which emits amber, red, or blue, or any combination of those lights.
(2)A facsimile of a light bar is any device designed or contrived to resemble a light bar regardless of the degree of light emission or lack thereof.
(c)This section shall not apply to a vehicle, if all of the following conditions are satisfied:
(1)The vehicle is possessed by a federal, state, or local historical society or museum that is open to the public.
(2)The vehicle is secured from unauthorized operation.
(3)The vehicle is not operated on any public road or highway, unless one of the following applies:
(A)The vehicle is being operated within a temporary street closure for the purposes of celebrations, parades, local special events, and other purposes when the operation is approved by local authorities having jurisdiction over the street closure.
(B)The vehicle is of a model year of at least twenty-five years prior to the year of operation.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2019 | Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 260, Statutes of 2019. |
| Sep 6, 2019 | Approved by the Governor. |
| Sep 3, 2019 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m. |
| Aug 26, 2019 | Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. |
| Aug 22, 2019 | In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77. |
| Aug 22, 2019 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. |
| Aug 19, 2019 | Ordered to special consent calendar. |
| Jul 5, 2019 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Jul 3, 2019 | Withdrawn from committee. |
| Jul 2, 2019 | Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Jul 1, 2019 | From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 25). |
| Jun 17, 2019 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on TRANS. |
| Jun 11, 2019 | In committee: Hearing postponed by committee. |
| May 22, 2019 | Referred to Com. on TRANS. |
| May 14, 2019 | In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. |
| May 13, 2019 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. |
| May 9, 2019 | Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Apr 23, 2019 | From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 23). |
| Feb 21, 2019 | Referred to Com. on A.,E.,S.,T., & I.M. |
| Jan 30, 2019 | From printer. May be heard in committee March 1. |
| Jan 29, 2019 | Read first time. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2019 | AB 309 Maienschein Concurrence in Senate Amendments | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Aug 22, 2019 | Special Consent AB309 | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Jun 25, 2019 | Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar | Senate Standing Committee on Transportation |
Passed |
|
| May 13, 2019 | AB 309 Maienschein Assembly Third Reading | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Apr 23, 2019 | Do pass. | Assembly Standing Committee on Arts, Entertainment, Sports, Tourism, and Internet Media |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
CSA1 Bill Id:AB 309
Author:(Maienschein)
As Amended Ver:July 2, 2019
Majority vote
SUMMARY:
This bill extends exemptions from the general prohibition against owning or operating a vehicle with law enforcement markings.
The Senate Amendments:
Strike language which would allow an institutional collection to come under this bill's exemptions and make additional technical and clarifying changes.
COMMENTS:
Please see the policy committee analysis for a full discussion of the measure.
According to the Author:
Museums and police historical societies that promote community relations are at risk of violating California Vehicle Code because the obsolete police cars, which are considered some of their most visible and interesting artifacts, may be technically in violation of the Vehicle Code prohibition against ownership of facsimile law enforcement vehicles that were originally registered after 1979.
Arguments in Support:
The sponsor, San Diego Police Historical Association, states in their support, "For many, an antique vehicle occupies a special place in nostalgic memories. Whether it reminds people of a simpler era, a special time in their life, or simply a long sought dream vehicle, car shows are as popular now as they have ever been. Police departments throughout the Golden State recognize this phenomenon and often use antique police cars at community relations events, recruiting fairs and other community outreach. …Approval of AB 309 will allow not just the San Diego Police Museum to own and display post 1979 police cars – some of which have significant historical value – but every museum and other educational institution in the State of California stymied by existing law."
Arguments in Opposition:
There is no opposition on file for this measure.
FISCAL COMMENTS:
None. This measure has been keyed non-fiscal by the Legislative Counsel.
VOTES:
ASM ARTS, ENTERTAINMENT, SPORTS, TOURISM, AND INTERNET MEDIA: 7-0-0
YES: Chu, Diep, Chiu, Choi, Friedman, Kamlager-Dove, Nazarian
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 76-0-4
YES: Aguiar-Curry, Bauer-Kahan, Berman, Bigelow, Bloom, Boerner Horvath, Bonta, Calderon, Carrillo, Cervantes, Chau, Chen, Chiu, Choi, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Cunningham, Dahle, Daly, Diep, Eggman, Flora, Fong, Friedman, Gabriel, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gloria, Gonzalez, Gray, Grayson, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Kamlager-Dove, Kiley, Lackey, Levine, Limón, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, O'Donnell, Obernolte, Patterson, Petrie‑Norris, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Robert Rivas, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Salas, Santiago, Smith, Mark Stone, Ting, Voepel, Waldron, Weber, Wicks, Wood, Rendon
ABS, ABST OR NV: Arambula, Brough, Burke, Frazier
SENATE FLOOR: 39-0-1
YES: Allen, Archuleta, Atkins, Bates, Beall, Borgeas, Bradford, Caballero, Chang, Dahle, Dodd, Durazo, Galgiani, Glazer, Lena Gonzalez, Grove, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Hurtado, Jackson, Leyva, McGuire, Mitchell, Monning, Moorlach, Morrell, Nielsen, Pan, Portantino, Roth, Rubio, Skinner, Stern, Stone, Umberg, Wieckowski, Wiener, Wilk
ABS, ABST OR NV: Jones
UPDATED:
VERSION: July 2, 2019
CONSULTANT: Dana Mitchell / A.,E.,S.,T., & I.M. / (916) 319-3450 FN: 0001204
Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | AB 309 |
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 309
Amended: 7/2/19 in Senate
SENATE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE: 13-0, 6/25/19
AYES: Beall, Bates, Dahle, Dodd, Galgiani, McGuire, Morrell, Roth, Rubio, Skinner, Stone, Umberg, Wieckowski
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 76-0, 5/13/19 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Vehicles that appear to be used by law enforcement: ownership or operation by public historical society or museum
DIGEST:
This bill extends exemptions from the general prohibition against owning or operating a vehicle with law enforcement markings.
Existing law:
- Provides that when a motor vehicle formerly used in law enforcement is sold for use other than law enforcement, the vehicle shall be painted and any insignia or other marking of the vehicle identifying it as a traffic law enforcement vehicle shall be removed before it shall be operated on any street or highway.
- Prohibits any person to own or operate a motor vehicle painted to resemble a motor vehicle used by a peace officer or traffic officer. Vehicles registered before January 1, 1979, are exempted.
- Prohibits any person to own or operate a motor vehicle which is equipped with a light bar, or facsimile thereof, to resemble a motor vehicle used by a peace officer or traffic officer.
- Provides exceptions from the above prohibitions for specified purposes, such as those used in movies.
This bill provides exemptions to the above existing laws for vehicles that meet all of the following conditions:
- The vehicle is possessed by a federal, state, or local historical society or museum that is open to the public;
- The vehicle is secured from unauthorized operation and is not operated upon a public road or highway.
- The prohibition on operation on a public road or highway does not apply to:
- Vehicles of a model year at least 25 years prior to the year of operation, or
- Instances where the vehicle is operating within a temporary street closure for a special event when the operation is approved by the local authority having jurisdiction over the street closure.
Comments
- Author’s Statement. Museums and police historical societies that promote community relations are at risk of violating California Vehicle Code because the obsolete police cars, which are considered some of their most visible and interesting artifacts, may be technically in violation of the Vehicle Code prohibition against ownership of facsimile law enforcement vehicles that were originally registered after 1979.
- Why? This bill arose because in San Diego local officials determined that current law prohibited the local police historical association from displaying post-1979 marked police cars. Supporters note that antique police cars are often used at community relations events and recruiting fairs.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No Local: No
California Association of Museums
California State Sheriffs Association
Napa Police Historical Society
Peace Officers Research Association of California
San Diego Police Historical Association
None received
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 76-0, 5/13/19
AYES: Aguiar-Curry, Bauer-Kahan, Berman, Bigelow, Bloom, Boerner Horvath, Bonta, Calderon, Carrillo, Cervantes, Chau, Chen, Chiu, Choi, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Cunningham, Dahle, Daly, Diep, Eggman, Flora, Fong, Friedman, Gabriel, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gloria, Gonzalez, Gray, Grayson, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Kamlager-Dove, Kiley, Lackey, Levine, Limón, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Patterson, Petrie-Norris, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Robert Rivas, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Salas, Santiago, Smith, Mark Stone, Ting, Voepel, Waldron, Weber, Wicks, Wood, Rendon
NO VOTE RECORDED: Arambula, Brough, Burke, Frazier
Prepared by: Randy Chinn / TRANS. / (916) 651-4121
7/5/19 15:16:11
**** END ****
SENATE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
Senator Jim Beall, Chair
2019 - 2020 Regular
Bill No: AB 309 Hearing Date: 6/25/2019
Author: | Maienschein | ||
Version: | 6/17/2019 Amended | ||
Urgency: | No | Fiscal: | No |
Consultant: | Randy Chinn | ||
SUBJECT: Vehicles that appear to be used by law enforcement: ownership or operation by public historical society, museum, or institutional collection
DIGEST: This bill extends exemptions from the general prohibition against owning or operating a vehicle with law enforcement markings.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- Provides that when a motor vehicle formerly used in law enforcement is sold for use other than law enforcement, the vehicle shall be painted and any insignia or other marking of the vehicle identifying it as a traffic law enforcement vehicle shall be removed before it shall be operated on any street or highway.
- Prohibits any person to own or operate a motor vehicle painted to resemble a motor vehicle used by a peace officer or traffic officer. Vehicles registered before January 1, 1979 are exempted.
- Prohibits any person to own or operate a motor vehicle which is equipped with a light bar, or facsimile thereof, to resemble a motor vehicle used by a peace officer or traffic officer.
- Provides exceptions from the above prohibitions for specified purposes, such as those used in movies.
This bill provides exemptions to the above existing laws for vehicles that meet all of the following conditions:
- The vehicle is possessed by a federal, state, or local historical society, museum, or institutional collection that is open to the public;
- The vehicle is secured from unauthorized operation and is not operated upon a public road or highway.
- The prohibition on operation on a public road or highway does not apply to:
- Vehicles of a model year at least 25 years prior to the year of operation, or
- Instances where the vehicle is being operating within a temporary street closure for a special event when the operation is approved by the local authority having jurisdiction over the street closure.
COMMENTS:
- Author’s Statement. Museums and police historical societies that promote community relations are at risk of violating California Vehicle Code because the obsolete police cars, which are considered some of their most visible and interesting artifacts, may be technically in violation of the Vehicle Code prohibition against ownership of facsimile law enforcement vehicles that were originally registered after 1979.
- Why? This bill arose because in San Diego local officials determined that current law prohibited the local police historical association from displaying post-1979 marked police cars. Supporters note that antique police cars are often used at community relations events and recruiting fairs.
- Technical Amendment. In addition to historical societies and museums, the bill allows vehicles possessed by “institutional collections” to possess marked police vehicles. It is not clear what an “institutional collection” is and there is no legal definition. The author may wish to consider deleting this phrase as it is unnecessary to the purpose of the bill.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No Local: No
POSITIONS: (Communicated to the committee before noon on Wednesday,
June 19, 2019.)
SUPPORT:
California Association of Museums
California State Sheriffs Association
Napa Police Historical Society
PORAC
San Diego Police Historical Association
OPPOSITION:
None received.
-- END --
SENATE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
Senator Jim Beall, Chair
2019 - 2020 Regular
Bill No: AB 309 Hearing Date: June 11, 2019
Author: | Maienschein | ||
Version: | 5/9/2019 | ||
Urgency: | No | Fiscal: | No |
Consultant: | Randy Chinn | ||
SUBJECT: Vehicles that appear to be used by law enforcement: ownership or operation by public historical society, museum, or institutional collection
DIGEST: This bill extends exemptions from the general prohibition against owning or operating a vehicle with law enforcement markings.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- Provides that when a motor vehicle formerly used in law enforcement is sold for use other than law enforcement, the vehicle shall be painted and any insignia or other marking of the vehicle identifying it as a traffic law enforcement vehicle shall be removed before it shall be operated on any street or highway.
- Prohibits any person to own or operate a motor vehicle painted to resemble a motor vehicle used by a peace officer or traffic officer. Vehicles registered before January 1, 1979 are exempted.
- Prohibits any person to own or operate a motor vehicle which is equipped with a light bar, or facsimile thereof, to resemble a motor vehicle used by a peace officer or traffic officer.
- Provides exceptions from the above prohibitions for specified purposes, such as those used in movies.
This bill provides exemptions to the above existing laws for vehicles that meet all of the following conditions:
- The vehicle is possessed by a federal, state, or local historical society, museum, or institutional collection that is open to the public;
- The vehicle is secured from unauthorized operation and is only operated upon a public road or highway in relation to an event or site where the vehicle will be on display, including transportation to and from the event or display site.
COMMENTS:
- Author’s Statement. Museums and police historical societies that promote community relations are at risk of violating California Vehicle code because the obsolete police cars, which are considered some of their most visible and interesting artifacts, may be technically in violation of the Vehicle Code prohibition against ownership of facsimile law enforcement vehicles that were originally registered after 1979.
- Why? This bill arose because in San Diego local officials determined that current law prohibited the local police historical association from displaying post-1979 marked police cars. Supporters note that antique police cars are often used at community relations events and recruiting fairs.
- Technical Amendment. In addition to historical societies and museums, the bill allows vehicles possessed by “institutional collections” to possess marked police vehicles. It is not clear what an “institutional collection” is and there is no legal definition. The author may wish to consider deleting this phrase as it is unnecessary to the purpose of the bill.
- On the Streets? The bill allows historical societies and museums to operate marked police vehicles on public roads while travelling to and from events. Public confusion will be created as those vehicles will look identical to operating police vehicles, even though those vehicles will be operated by civilians. Those vehicles will be unable to respond to calls for help. The author may wish to consider avoiding that confusion by adding the provision that while the vehicle is being transported to and from the event, the vehicle shall display conspicuous signage indicating that the vehicle is out of service.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No Local: No
POSITIONS: (Communicated to the committee before noon on Wednesday,
June 5, 2019.)
SUPPORT:
California Association of Museums
California State Sheriffs Association
Napa Police Historical Society
PORAC
San Diego Police Historical Association
OPPOSITION:
None received.
-- END --
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
ATR Bill Id:AB 309
Author:(Maienschein)
As Amended Ver:May 9, 2019
Majority vote
SUMMARY:
Extends the exemption for retired law enforcement vehicles, as provided, from the general prohibition against owning or operating a vehicle with law enforcement markings.
Major Provisions
- Create an exemption for post 1979 vehicles possessed by a historical society, museum, or institutional collection that is open to the public and the vehicle is secured from unauthorized operation from the general prohibition against owning or operating a vehicle with law enforcement markings
- Clarify that authorized use of retired law enforcement vehicles under the bill will only allow operation of the vehicle upon a public road or highway in relation to an event or site where the vehicle will be on display, including transportation to and from the event or display site.
COMMENTS:
Please see the policy committee analysis for a full discussion of the measure.
According to the Author:
"Museums and police historical societies that promote community relations, are at risk of violating California Vehicle Code, because the obsolete police cars – which are considered some of their most visible and interesting artifacts – may be technically in violation of the Vehicle Code prohibition against ownership of facsimile law enforcement vehicles that were originally registered after 1979."
Arguments in Support:
The sponsor, San Diego Police Historical Association, adds, "For many, an antique vehicle occupies a special place in nostalgic memories. Whether it reminds people of a simpler era, a special time in their life, or simply a long sought dream vehicle, car shows are as popular now as they have ever been. Police departments throughout the Golden State recognize this phenomenon and often use antique police cars at community relations events, recruiting fairs and other community outreach. … Approval of AB 309 will allow not just the San Diego Police Museum to own and display post 1979 police cars – some of which have significant historical value – but every museum and other educational institution in the State of California stymied by existing law."
Arguments in Opposition:
There is no opposition on file.
FISCAL COMMENTS:
This measure has been keyed non-fiscal by the Legislative Counsel.
VOTES:
ASM ARTS, ENTERTAINMENT, SPORTS, TOURISM, AND INTERNET MEDIA: 7-0-0
YES: Chu, Diep, Chiu, Choi, Friedman, Kamlager-Dove, Nazarian
UPDATED:
VERSION: May 9, 2019
CONSULTANT: Dana Mitchell / A.,E.,S.,T., & I.M. / (916) 319-3450 FN: 0000382
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
ATR Bill Id:AB 309
Author:(Maienschein)
As Introduced Ver:January 29, 2019
Majority vote
SUMMARY:
Extends the exemption for retired law enforcement vehicles, as provided, from the general prohibition against owning or operating a vehicle with law enforcement markings.
Major Provisions
This bill will create an exemption for post 1979 vehicles possessed by a historical society, museum, or institutional collection that is open to the public and the vehicle is secured from unauthorized operation from the general prohibition against owning or operating a vehicle with law enforcement markings.
COMMENTS:
Please see the policy committee analysis for a full discussion of the measure.
According to the Author:
According to the Author, "Museums and police historical societies that promote community relations, are at risk of violating California Vehicle Code, because the obsolete police cars – which are considered some of their most visible and interesting artifacts – may be technically in violation of the Vehicle Code prohibition against ownership of facsimile law enforcement vehicles that were originally registered after 1979."
Arguments in Support:
The sponsor, San Diego Police Historical Association, adds, "For many, an antique vehicle occupies a special place in nostalgic memories. Whether it reminds people of a simpler era, a special time in their life, or simply a long sought dream vehicle, car shows are as popular now as they have ever been. Police departments throughout the Golden State recognize this phenomenon and often use antique police cars at community relations events, recruiting fairs and other community outreach. … Approval of AB 309 will allow not just the San Diego Police Museum to own and display post 1979 police cars – some of which have significant historical value – but every museum and other educational institution in the State of California stymied by existing law."
Arguments in Opposition:
There is no opposition on file.
FISCAL COMMENTS:
This bill is keyed non-fiscal by the Legislative Counsel.
VOTES:
ASM ARTS, ENTERTAINMENT, SPORTS, TOURISM, AND INTERNET MEDIA: 7-0-0
YES: Chu, Diep, Chiu, Choi, Friedman, Kamlager-Dove, Nazarian
UPDATED:
VERSION: January 29, 2019
CONSULTANT: Dana Mitchell / A.,E.,S.,T., & I.M. / (916) 319-3450 FN: 0000240
Date of Hearing: April 23, 2019
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON ARTS, ENTERTAINMENT, SPORTS, TOURISM, AND INTERNET MEDIA
Kansen Chu, Chair
ABPCA Bill Id:AB 309 (
Author:Maienschein) – As Introduced Ver:January 29, 2019
SUBJECT: Vehicles that appear to be used by law enforcement: ownership or operation by public historical society, museum, or institutional collection.
SUMMARY: Extends exemptions from the general prohibition against owning or operating a vehicle with law enforcement markings, as defined, to include a vehicle possessed by a historical society, museum, or institutional collection that is open to the public and the vehicle is secured from unauthorized operation.
EXISTING LAW:
- Provides that when a motor vehicle formerly used in law enforcement is sold for use other than law enforcement, the vehicle shall be painted and any insignia or other marking of the vehicle identifying it as a traffic law enforcement vehicle shall be removed before it shall be operated on any street or highway.
- Prohibits any person to own or operate a motor vehicle which is equipped with a light bar, or facsimile thereof, to resemble a motor vehicle used by a peace officer or traffic officer.
- Provides exceptions from the above prohibitions for specified purposes.
FISCAL EFFECT: This measure has been keyed as non-fiscal by the Legislative Counsel.
COMMENTS:
- Author and supporters statement of need: To allow museums to maintain historically accurate post-1979 law enforcement vehicles. According to the Author, “Museums and police historical societies that promote community relations, are at risk of violating California Vehicle Code, because the obsolete police cars – which are considered some of their most visible and interesting artifacts – may be technically in violation of the Vehicle Code prohibition against ownership of facsimile law enforcement vehicles.” The sponsor, San Diego Police Historical Association, adds, “For many, an antique vehicle occupies a special place in nostalgic memories. Whether it reminds people of a simpler era, a special time in their life, or simply a long sought dream vehicle, car shows are as popular now as they have ever been. Police departments throughout the Golden State recognize this phenomenon and often use antique police cars at community relations events, recruiting fairs and other community outreach. … Approval of AB 309 will allow not just the San Diego Police Museum to own and display post 1979 police cars – some of which have significant historical value – but every museum and other educational institution in the State of California stymied by existing law.”
- Current exemptions for ownership and operation motor vehicles with police markings. Under existing law the prohibition against owning and operating law enforcement vehicles or vehicles with light bars do not apply to vehicles which are painted one solid color or to vehicles first registered on or before January 1, 1979, in addition to vehicles; Owned by vehicle manufacturers or dealers; Used by law enforcement agencies, as specified; Owned by persons or companies who use the vehicles exclusively for movie or television production and display signs stating “movie car” prominently on the doors; Owned by persons or companies who use the vehicles exclusively for funeral escort purposes, or; Motorcycles without insignia.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
California Association of Museums
California State Sheriffs' Association
Napa Police Historical Society
San Diego Police Historical Association
Opposition
There is no opposition on file.
Analysis Prepared by: Dana Mitchell / A.,E.,S.,T., & I.M. / (916) 319-3450
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):