SCR 26: Equal Pay Day.
- Session Year: 2019-2020
- House: Senate
- Latest Version Date: 2019-04-17
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2019 | Chaptered by Secretary of State. Res. Chapter 39, Statutes of 2019. |
| Apr 17, 2019 | Enrolled and filed with the Secretary of State at 3 p.m. |
| Apr 11, 2019 | In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling. |
| Apr 11, 2019 | Read. Adopted. Ordered to the Senate. |
| Apr 8, 2019 | From committee: Be adopted. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 8). |
| Apr 1, 2019 | Referred to Com. on RLS. |
| Mar 28, 2019 | In Assembly. Held at Desk. |
| Mar 28, 2019 | Read. Adopted. (Ayes 32. Noes 0.) Ordered to the Assembly. |
| Mar 27, 2019 | From committee: Ordered to third reading. |
| Mar 14, 2019 | Introduced. Referred to Com. on RLS. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2019 | SCR 26 Jackson Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Apr 8, 2019 | Be adopted. To Consent Calendar. | Assembly Standing Committee on Rules |
Passed |
|
| Mar 28, 2019 | Senate 3rd Reading SCR26 Jackson et al. | Senate Floor |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
Date of Hearing: April 8, 2019
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON RULES
Ken Cooley, Chair
SBPCA Bill Id:SCR 26
Author:(Jackson) – As Introduced Ver:March 14, 2019
SENATE VOTE: 34-0
SUBJECT: Equal Pay Day.
SUMMARY: Proclaims Tuesday, April 2, 2019, as Equal Pay Day in recognition of the need to eliminate the gender gap in earnings by women and to promote policies to ensure equal pay for all. Specifically, this resolution makes the following legislative findings:
- More than 50 years after the passage of the federal Equal Pay Act, women, especially minority women, continue to suffer the consequences of unequal pay.
- According to the 2018 Report on the Status of Women and Girls in California by Mount Saint Mary’s University, the gender wage gap for full-time, year-round workers in California is $0.12, meaning California women only take home 88% of men’s earnings or $7,000 a year less than men. In 2017, median annual earnings in the U.S. for full-time workers were $41,977 for women, compared to $52,146 for men, a ratio of 80 cents on the dollar.
- According to the American Association of University Women’s report “The Simple Truth About the Gender Pay Gap,” the gender pay gap exists for every age group: women ages 20-24 make 90% of what men make, women ages 25-54 are paid 78-89% of what men make, and women ages 55 to 65 are paid 78% of what men make.
- The pay gap contributes to women’s poverty; and if the gap narrows at the same rate of change since 2001, it will not close until 2106.
- In order to address the persistent problem, both public and private data gathering is needed so that gaps can be better identified and addressed.
- In 2015, the California Legislature passed SB 358, known as the California Fair Pay Act, strengthening the state’s existing Equal Pay Act by eliminating loopholes that prevented effective enforcement of gender-based discrimination and empowering employees to discuss pay without fear of retaliation, providing one more tool to tackle the problem.
- Almost two-thirds of women in California are employed, and nearly four in 10 mothers are primary breadwinners in their households. Two-thirds of mothers are primary or significant earners, making pay equity critical to families’ economic security.
- A lifetime of lower pay means women have less income to save for retirement and less income counted in a social security or pension benefit formula.
- Fair pay policies can be implemented simply and without undue costs or hardship in both the public and private sectors as evidenced by the work of this state’s Commission on the Status of Women and Girls.
- Fair pay strengthens the security of families today, reduces the need for the public safety net and provides a more secure retirement while enhancing the American economy.
- Tuesday, April 2, symbolizes the time in 2019 when the wages paid to American women catch up to the wages paid to men from the previous year.
FISCAL EFFECT: None
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
None on file
Opposition
None on file
Analysis Prepared by: Nicole Willis / RLS. / (916) 319-2800
Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | SCR 26 |
THIRD READING
Bill No: SCR 26
Introduced: 3/14/19
DIGEST:
This resolution proclaims Tuesday, April 2, 2019, as Equal Pay Day in recognition of the need to eliminate the gender gap in earnings by women and to promote policies to ensure equal pay for all.
ANALYSIS: This resolution makes the following legislative findings:
- More than 50 years after the passage of the federal Equal Pay Act, women continue to suffer the consequences of unequal pay.
- According to the 2018 Report on the Status of Women and Girls in California by Mount Saint Mary’s University, the gender wage gap for full-time, year-round workers in California is $0.12, meaning California women only take home 88% of men’s earnings or $7,000 a year less than men. In 2017, median annual earnings in the U.S. for full-time workers were $41,977 for women, compared to $52,146 for men, a ratio of 80 cents on the dollar.
- According to the American Association of University Women’s report “The Simple Truth About the Gender Pay Gap,” the gender pay gap exists for every age group: women ages 20-24 make 90% of what men make, women ages 25-54 are paid 78-89% of what men make, and women ages 55 to 65 are paid 78% of what men make.
- The pay gap contributes to women’s poverty; and if the gap narrows at the same rate of change since 2001, it will not close until 2106.
- In order to address the persistent problem, both public and private data gathering is needed so that gaps can be better identified and addressed.
- In 2015, the California Legislature passed SB 358, known as the California Fair Pay Act, strengthening the state’s existing Equal Pay Act by eliminating loopholes that prevented effective enforcement of gender-based discrimination and empowering employees to discuss pay without fear of retaliation, providing one more tool to tackle the problem.
- Almost two-thirds of women in California are employed, and nearly four in 10 mothers are primary breadwinners in their households. Two-thirds of mothers are primary or significant earners, making pay equity critical to families’ economic security.
- A lifetime of lower pay means women have less income to save for retirement and less income counted in a social security or pension benefit formula.
- Fair pay policies can be implemented simply and without undue costs or hardship in both the public and private sectors as evidenced by the work of this state’s Commission on the Status of Women and Girls.
- Fair pay strengthens the security of families today, reduces the need for the public safety net and provides a more secure retirement while enhancing the American economy.
- Tuesday, April 2, symbolizes the time in 2019 when the wages paid to American women catch up to the wages paid to men from the previous year.
This resolution proclaims Tuesday, April 2, 2019, as Equal Pay Day in recognition of the need to eliminate the gender gap in earnings by women and to promote policies to ensure equal pay for all.
Related/Prior Legislation
ACR 204 (Baker, Resolution Chapter 52, Statutes of 2018) proclaimed Tuesday, April 10, 2018, as Equal Pay Day in recognition of the need to eliminate the gender gap in earnings by women and to promote policies to ensure equal pay for all.
SCR 37 (Jackson, Resolution Chapter 45, Statutes of 2017) proclaimed Tuesday, April 4, 2017, as Equal Pay Day in recognition of the need to eliminate the gender gap in earnings by women and to promote policies to ensure equal pay for all.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No Local: No
American Association of University Women
OPPOSITION: (Verified 3/27/19)
None received
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The American Association of University Women writes, “There remains a disparity in earnings due to the different choices that men and women make in education, employment, and work-‐life balance. However, to explain the wage gap as solely the result of choices made is intellectually dishonest and ignores the massive amount of research by statisticians who have controlled for those factors and still found an “unexplained” wage gap. Unless there is an important factor that every statistician studying this issue has for some reason missed, that wage gap is attributable solely to being a woman. Thank you for introducing this important Resolution and recognizing the economic inequality that continues to work against the empowerment of women.”
Prepared by: Melissa Ward / SFA / (916) 651-1520
3/27/19 14:51:52
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):