AB 1505: Community colleges: full-time faculty obligation.
- Session Year: 2021-2022
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2022-01-04
Existing law establishes the California Community Colleges under the administration of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges as one of the segments of public postsecondary education in the state. Existing regulations require a community college district to increase its base number of full-time faculty over the prior year in proportion to the amount of growth in funded credit full-time equivalent students. These regulations, in years in which the board of governors determines that the annual Budget Act does not contain adequate funding to warrant full implementation of this full-time faculty obligation, authorize a community college district to instead choose to maintain, at a minimum, the full-time faculty percentage attained by the community college district in the prior fall term.
This bill would require the board of governors to adopt regulations that require the fall of 2023 full-time faculty obligation for each community college district to be set to the actual full-time faculty number reported for the fall of 2022 and annually adjusted pursuant to these regulations.
Existing law requires the State Board of Education to develop guidelines that school districts may use in the development of teacher evaluation procedures, and distribute those guidelines to every school district. Existing law requires the governing board of each school district to establish standards of expected pupil achievement at each grade level in each area of study and to evaluate and assess certificated employee performance as it reasonably relates to the progress of pupils toward the established standards and, if applicable, the state adopted academic content standards, as provided. Existing law authorizes school district governing boards to develop and adopt additional evaluation and assessment guidelines or criteria.Existing law requires an evaluation and assessment of the performance of a certificated employee to be made on a continuing basis, including annually for probationary certificated employees, biennially for certificated employees with permanent status, and, if the evaluator and the certificated employee being evaluated agree, at least every 5 years for a certificated employee with permanent status, who has been employed at least 10 years with the school district, is highly qualified, and occupies a position that is required to be filled by a highly qualified professional, as provided. This bill would require school districts that have closed their schoolsites and implemented distance learning because of fire, flood, impassable roads, an epidemic, or another emergency to exempt all certificated employees with permanent status, and all employees with certificated status who have worked in the same position for at least 2 years, from formal evaluations during distance learning. The bill would prohibit resuming formal evaluations of the exempted certificated employees until schoolsites have resumed in-person instruction.Existing law requires the State Board of Education to develop guidelines that school districts may use in the development of teacher evaluation procedures, and distribute those guidelines to every school district. Existing law requires the governing board of each school district to establish standards of expected pupil achievement at each grade level in each area of study and to evaluate and assess certificated employee performance as it reasonably relates to the progress of pupils toward the established standards and, if applicable, the state adopted academic content standards, as provided. Existing law authorizes school district governing boards to develop and adopt additional evaluation and assessment guidelines or criteria.
Existing law requires an evaluation and assessment of the performance of a certificated employee to be made on a continuing basis, including annually for probationary certificated employees, biennially for certificated employees with permanent status, and, if the evaluator and the certificated employee being evaluated agree, at least every 5 years for a certificated employee with permanent status, who has been employed at least 10 years with the school district, is highly qualified, and occupies a position that is required to be filled by a highly qualified professional, as provided.
This bill would require school districts that have closed their schoolsites and implemented distance learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic because of fire, flood, impassable roads, an epidemic, or another emergency to exempt all certificated employees with permanent status, and all employees with certificated status who have worked in the same position for at least 2 years, from formal evaluations during distance learning. The bill would prohibit resuming formal evaluations of the exempted certificated employees until schoolsites have reopened. resumed in-person instruction.
Existing law requires the State Board of Education to develop guidelines that school districts may use in the development of teacher evaluation procedures, and distribute those guidelines to every school district. Existing law requires the governing board of each school district to establish standards of expected pupil achievement at each grade level in each area of study and to evaluate and assess certificated employee performance as it reasonably relates to the progress of pupils toward the established standards and, if applicable, the state adopted academic content standards, as provided. Existing law authorizes school district governing boards to develop and adopt additional evaluation and assessment guidelines or criteria.
Existing law requires an evaluation and assessment of the performance of a certificated employee to be made on a continuing basis, including annually for probationary certificated employees, biennially for certificated employees with permanent status, and, if the evaluator and the certificated employee being evaluated agree, at least every 5 years for a certificated employee with permanent status, who has been employed at least 10 years with the school district, is highly qualified, and occupies a position that is required to be filled by a highly qualified professional, as provided.
This bill would require school districts that have closed their schoolsites and implemented distance learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic to exempt all certificated employees with permanent status, and all employees with certificated status who have worked in the same position for at least 2 years, from formal evaluations during distance learning. The bill would prohibit resuming formal evaluations of the exempted certificated employees until schoolsites have reopened.
The board of governors shall adopt regulations that require the fall of 2023 full-time faculty obligation for each community college district to be set to the actual full-time faculty number reported for the fall of 2022 and annually adjusted pursuant to Section 51025 of Title 5 of the California Code of Regulations.
SECTION 1.The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a)The COVID-19 global pandemic has required schools to close for several months.(b)These closures have required school staff to transition to distance learning.(c)Distance learning has created tremendous disruptions to the educational process.(d)Evaluating school employees during a time of closures creates numerous challenges for both educators and administrators that could negatively impact the evaluation of these employees.(e)It is impossible for current employee evaluation tools to accurately measure the performance of certificated employees during school closures.(f)Employee evaluations of permanent employees, and temporary employees who have served at least two years in the same position, should be postponed until schools have reopened.SEC. 2.Section 44664 of the Education Code is amended to read:44664.(a)Evaluation and assessment of the performance of each certificated employee shall be made on a continuing basis as follows:(1)At least once each school year for probationary personnel.(2)At least every other year for personnel with permanent status.(3)At least every five years for personnel with permanent status who have been employed at least 10 years with the school district, are highly qualified, if those personnel occupy positions that are required to be filled by a highly qualified professional by the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (20 U.S.C. Sec. 6301, et seq.), as defined in 20 U.S.C. Sec. 7801, and whose previous evaluation rated the employee as meeting or exceeding standards, if the evaluator and certificated employee being evaluated agree. The certificated employee or the evaluator may withdraw consent at any time.(b)The evaluation shall include recommendations, if necessary, as to areas of improvement in the performance of the certificated employee. If a certificated employee is not performing the employees duties in a satisfactory manner according to the standards prescribed by the governing board, the employing authority shall notify the employee in writing of that fact and describe the unsatisfactory performance. The employing authority shall thereafter confer with the certificated employee making specific recommendations as to areas of improvement in the employees performance and endeavor to assist the employee in the employees performance. If a permanent certificated employee has received an unsatisfactory evaluation, the employing authority shall annually evaluate the employee until the employee achieves a positive evaluation or is separated from the school district.(c)An evaluation performed pursuant to this article that contains an unsatisfactory rating of a certificated employees performance in the area of teaching methods or instruction may include the requirement that the certificated employee shall, as determined necessary by the employing authority, participate in a program designed to improve appropriate areas of the employees performance and to further pupil achievement and the instructional objectives of the employing authority. If a school district participates in the California Peer Assistance and Review Program for Teachers established pursuant to Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 44500), a certificated employee who receives an unsatisfactory rating on an evaluation performed pursuant to this section shall participate in the California Peer Assistance and Review Program for Teachers.(d)Hourly and temporary hourly certificated employees, other than those employed in adult education classes who are excluded by Section 44660, and substitute teachers may be excluded from the provisions of this section at the discretion of the governing board of the school district.(e)(1)Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) and (b), a school district that has closed schoolsites and implemented distance learning for the schools within its jurisdiction because of fire, flood, impassable roads, an epidemic, or another emergency shall exempt all permanent certificated employees who instruct pupils from any formal evaluations during any period of distance learning.(2)Notwithstanding Section 44660 and subdivision (d), the exemption described in paragraph (1) shall also apply to all temporary certificated employees who instruct pupils or who are employed in adult education classes who have served at least two years in the same position.(3)Formal evaluations for the certificated employees who are exempt pursuant to paragraphs (1) and (2) shall not resume until schoolsites have resumed in-person instruction.The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)The COVID-19 global pandemic has required schools to close for several months.
(b)These closures have required school staff to transition to distance learning.
(c)Distance learning has created tremendous disruptions to the educational process.
(d)Evaluating school employees during a time of closures creates numerous challenges for both educators and administrators that could negatively impact the evaluation of these employees.
(e)It is impossible for current employee evaluation tools to accurately measure the performance of certificated employees during school closures.
(f)Employee evaluations of permanent employees, and temporary employees who have served at least two years in the same position, should be postponed until schools have reopened.
SEC. 2.Section 44664 of the Education Code is amended to read:44664.(a)Evaluation and assessment of the performance of each certificated employee shall be made on a continuing basis as follows:
(1)At least once each school year for probationary personnel.
(2)At least every other year for personnel with permanent status.
(3)At least every five years for personnel with permanent status who have been employed at least 10 years with the school district, are highly qualified, if those personnel occupy positions that are required to be filled by a highly qualified professional by the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (20 U.S.C. Sec. 6301, et seq.), as defined in 20 U.S.C. Sec. 7801, and whose previous evaluation rated the employee as meeting or exceeding standards, if the evaluator and certificated employee being evaluated agree. The certificated employee or the evaluator may withdraw consent at any time.
(b)The evaluation shall include recommendations, if necessary, as to areas of improvement in the performance of the certificated employee. If a certificated employee is not performing the employees duties in a satisfactory manner according to the standards prescribed by the governing board, the employing authority shall notify the employee in writing of that fact and describe the unsatisfactory performance. The employing authority shall thereafter confer with the certificated employee making specific recommendations as to areas of improvement in the employees performance and endeavor to assist the employee in the employees performance. If a permanent certificated employee has received an unsatisfactory evaluation, the employing authority shall annually evaluate the employee until the employee achieves a positive evaluation or is separated from the school district.
(c)An evaluation performed pursuant to this article that contains an unsatisfactory rating of a certificated employees performance in the area of teaching methods or instruction may include the requirement that the certificated employee shall, as determined necessary by the employing authority, participate in a program designed to improve appropriate areas of the employees performance and to further pupil achievement and the instructional objectives of the employing authority. If a school district participates in the California Peer Assistance and Review Program for Teachers established pursuant to Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 44500), a certificated employee who receives an unsatisfactory rating on an evaluation performed pursuant to this section shall participate in the California Peer Assistance and Review Program for Teachers.
(d)Hourly and temporary hourly certificated employees, other than those employed in adult education classes who are excluded by Section 44660, and substitute teachers may be excluded from the provisions of this section at the discretion of the governing board of the school district.
(e)(1)Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) and (b), a school district that has closed schoolsites and implemented distance learning for the schools within its jurisdiction due to the COVID-19 pandemic because of fire, flood, impassable roads, an epidemic, or another emergency shall exempt all permanent certificated employees who instruct pupils from any formal evaluations during any period of distance learning.
(2)Notwithstanding Section 44660 and subdivision (d), the exemption described in paragraph (1) shall also apply to all temporary certificated employees who instruct pupils or who are employed in adult education classes who have served at least two years in the same position.
(3)Formal evaluations for the certificated employees who are exempt pursuant to paragraphs (1) and (2) shall not resume until schoolsites have reopened. resumed in-person instruction.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)The COVID-19 global pandemic has required schools to close for several months.
(b)These closures have required school staff to transition to distance learning.
(c)Distance learning has created tremendous disruptions to the educational process.
(d)Evaluating school employees during a time of closures creates numerous challenges for both educators and administrators that could negatively impact the evaluation of these employees.
(e)It is impossible for current employee evaluation tools to accurately measure the performance of certificated employees during school closures.
(f)Employee evaluations of permanent employees, and temporary employees who have served at least two years in the same position, should be postponed until schools have reopened.
SEC. 2.Section 44664 of the Education Code is amended to read:44664.(a)Evaluation and assessment of the performance of each certificated employee shall be made on a continuing basis as follows:
(1)At least once each school year for probationary personnel.
(2)At least every other year for personnel with permanent status.
(3)At least every five years for personnel with permanent status who have been employed at least 10 years with the school district, are highly qualified, if those personnel occupy positions that are required to be filled by a highly qualified professional by the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (20 U.S.C. Sec. 6301, et seq.), as defined in 20 U.S.C. Sec. 7801, and whose previous evaluation rated the employee as meeting or exceeding standards, if the evaluator and certificated employee being evaluated agree. The certificated employee or the evaluator may withdraw consent at any time.
(b)The evaluation shall include recommendations, if necessary, as to areas of improvement in the performance of the certificated employee. If an a certificated employee is not performing his or her the employees duties in a satisfactory manner according to the standards prescribed by the governing board, the employing authority shall notify the employee in writing of that fact and describe the unsatisfactory performance. The employing authority shall thereafter confer with the certificated employee making specific recommendations as to areas of improvement in the employees performance and endeavor to assist the employee in his or her the employees performance. If any a permanent certificated employee has received an unsatisfactory evaluation, the employing authority shall annually evaluate the employee until the employee achieves a positive evaluation or is separated from the school district.
(c)Any An evaluation performed pursuant to this article which that contains an unsatisfactory rating of an a certificated employees performance in the area of teaching methods or instruction may include the requirement that the certificated employee shall, as determined necessary by the employing authority, participate in a program designed to improve appropriate areas of the employees performance and to further pupil achievement and the instructional objectives of the employing authority. If a school district participates in the California Peer Assistance and Review Program for Teachers established pursuant to Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 44500), any a certificated employee who receives an unsatisfactory rating on an evaluation performed pursuant to this section shall participate in the California Peer Assistance and Review Program for Teachers.
(d)Hourly and temporary hourly certificated employees, other than those employed in adult education classes who are excluded by the provisions of Section 44660, and substitute teachers may be excluded from the provisions of this section at the discretion of the governing board. board of the school district.
(e)(1)Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) and (b), a school district that has closed schoolsites and implemented distance learning for the schools within its jurisdiction due to the COVID-19 pandemic shall exempt all permanent certificated employees who instruct pupils from any formal evaluations during any period of distance learning.
(2)Notwithstanding Section 44660 and subdivision (d), the exemption described in paragraph (1) shall also apply to all temporary certificated employees who instruct pupils or who are employed in adult education classes who have served at least two years in the same position.
(3)Formal evaluations for the certificated employees who are exempt pursuant to paragraphs (1) and (2) shall not resume until schoolsites have reopened.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2022 | In committee: Held under submission. |
| Jun 13, 2022 | In committee: Referred to suspense file. |
| Jun 1, 2022 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (June 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| May 4, 2022 | Referred to Com. on ED. |
| Feb 1, 2022 | In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. |
| Jan 31, 2022 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 3431.) |
| Jan 24, 2022 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Jan 20, 2022 | From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (January 20). |
| Jan 12, 2022 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (January 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Jan 6, 2022 | Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96. |
| Jan 5, 2022 | Re-referred to Com. on ED. |
| Jan 4, 2022 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended. |
| Mar 30, 2021 | Re-referred to Com. on ED. |
| Mar 29, 2021 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended. |
| Mar 11, 2021 | Referred to Com. on ED. |
| Feb 22, 2021 | Read first time. |
| Feb 20, 2021 | From printer. May be heard in committee March 22. |
| Feb 19, 2021 | Introduced. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2022 | AB 1505 Rodriguez Assembly Third Reading | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):