AB 322: Energy: Electric Program Investment Charge program: biomass.
- Session Year: 2021-2022
- House: Assembly
- Latest Version Date: 2021-09-23
The California Constitution establishes the Public Utilities Commission (PUC), with jurisdiction over all public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing decisions of the PUC institute an Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) to fund renewable energy and research, development, and demonstration programs.
Existing law creates in the State Treasury the Electric Program Investment Charge Fund to be administered by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) and requires the PUC to forward to the Energy Commission, at least quarterly, moneys for those EPIC programs the PUC has determined should be administered by the Energy Commission for deposit in the fund.
Existing law requires the Energy Commission, in administering moneys in the fund for research, development, and demonstration programs, to develop and implement the EPIC program for the purpose of awarding funds to projects that may lead to technological advancement and breakthroughs to overcome barriers that prevent the achievement of the states statutory energy goals and that may result in a portfolio of projects that are strategically focused and sufficiently narrow to make advancement on the most significant technological challenges. Existing law, until January 1, 2023, requires the Energy Commission to expend certain percentages of the moneys appropriated from the fund for technology demonstration and deployment at sites that benefit certain communities.
This bill would require the Energy Commission to consider, in the investment planning process for the EPIC program, funding for eligible biomass conversion to energy projects, as specified. The bill would require the commission, in determining the appropriate amount of EPIC funding for biomass conversion, to consider the recommendations of the State Air Resources Board and the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, and to coordinate with the Natural Resources Agency, the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, and the Department of Food and Agriculture about the need for biomass conversion. The bill would also require the Energy Commission to consider opportunities to reduce short-lived climate pollutant emissions, generate carbon negative emissions, reduce wildfire impacts, and increase energy reliability.
The California Constitution establishes the Public Utilities Commission (PUC), with jurisdiction over all public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing decisions of the PUC institute an Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) to fund renewable energy and research, development, and demonstration programs.
Existing law creates in the State Treasury the Electric Program Investment Charge Fund to be administered by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) and requires the PUC to forward to the Energy Commission, at least quarterly, moneys for those EPIC programs the PUC has determined should be administered by the Energy Commission for deposit in the fund.
Existing law requires the Energy Commission, in administering moneys in the fund for research, development, and demonstration programs, to develop and implement the EPIC program for the purpose of awarding funds to projects that may lead to technological advancement and breakthroughs to overcome barriers that prevent the achievement of the states statutory energy goals and that may result in a portfolio of projects that are strategically focused and sufficiently narrow to make advancement on the most significant technological challenges. Existing law, until January 1, 2023, requires the Energy Commission to expend certain percentages of the moneys appropriated from the fund for technology demonstration and deployment at sites that benefit certain communities.
This bill would require the Energy Commission to consider, in the investment planning process for the EPIC program, funding for eligible biomass conversion to energy projects, as specified. The bill would require the commission, in determining the appropriate amount of EPIC funding for biomass conversion, to consider the recommendations of the State Air Resources Board and the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, and to coordinate with the Natural Resources Agency, the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, and the Department of Food and Agriculture about the need for biomass conversion. The bill would also require the Energy Commission to consider opportunities to reduce short-lived climate pollutant emissions, generate carbon negative emissions, reduce wildfire impacts, and increase energy reliability.
The California Constitution establishes the Public Utilities Commission (PUC), with jurisdiction over all public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing decisions of the PUC institute an Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) to fund renewable energy and research, development, and demonstration programs.
Existing law creates in the State Treasury the Electric Program Investment Charge Fund to be administered by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) and requires the PUC to forward to the Energy Commission, at least quarterly, moneys for those EPIC programs the PUC has determined should be administered by the Energy Commission for deposit in the fund.
Existing law requires the Energy Commission, in administering moneys in the fund for research, development, and demonstration programs, to develop and implement the EPIC program for the purpose of awarding funds to projects that may lead to technological advancement and breakthroughs to overcome barriers that prevent the achievement of the states statutory energy goals and that may result in a portfolio of projects that are strategically focused and sufficiently narrow to make advancement on the most significant technological challenges. Existing law, until January 1, 2023, requires the Energy Commission to expend certain percentages of the moneys appropriated from the fund for technology demonstration and deployment at sites that benefit certain communities.
This bill would require the Energy Commission to consider, in the investment planning process for the EPIC program, funding for eligible biomass conversion to energy projects, as specified. The bill would require the commission, in determining the appropriate amount of EPIC funding for biomass conversion, to consider the recommendations of the State Air Resources Board and the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, and to coordinate with the Natural Resources Agency, the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, and the Department of Food and Agriculture about the need for biomass conversion. The bill would also require the commission to consider opportunities to reduce short-lived climate pollutant emissions, generate carbon negative emissions, reduce wildfire impacts, and increase energy reliability.
The California Constitution establishes the Public Utilities Commission (PUC), with jurisdiction over all public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing decisions of the PUC institute an Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) to fund renewable energy and research, development, and demonstration programs.
Existing law creates in the State Treasury the Electric Program Investment Charge Fund to be administered by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) and requires the PUC to forward to the Energy Commission, at least quarterly, moneys for those EPIC programs the PUC has determined should be administered by the Energy Commission for deposit in the fund.
Existing law requires the Energy Commission, in administering moneys in the fund for research, development, and demonstration programs, to develop and implement the EPIC program for the purpose of awarding funds to projects that may lead to technological advancement and breakthroughs to overcome barriers that prevent the achievement of the states statutory energy goals and that may result in a portfolio of projects that are strategically focused and sufficiently narrow to make advancement on the most significant technological challenges. Existing law, until January 1, 2023, requires the Energy Commission to expend certain percentages of the moneys appropriated from the fund for technology demonstration and deployment at sites that benefit certain communities.
This bill would require the Energy Commission to consider, in the investment planning process for the EPIC program, bioenergy projects for biomass conversion, funding for eligible biomass conversion to energy projects, as specified. The bill would require the commission, in determining the appropriate amount of EPIC funding for biomass conversion, to consider the recommendations of the State Air Resources Board and the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, and to coordinate with the Natural Resources Agency, the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, and the Department of Food and Agriculture about the need for biomass conversion. The bill would also require the commission to consider opportunities to reduce short-lived climate pollutant emissions, generate carbon negative emissions, reduce wildfire impacts, and increase energy reliability.
The California Constitution establishes the Public Utilities Commission (PUC), with jurisdiction over all public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing decisions of the PUC institute an Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) to fund renewable energy and research, development, and demonstration programs.
Existing law creates in the State Treasury the Electric Program Investment Charge Fund to be administered by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) and requires the PUC to forward to the Energy Commission, at least quarterly, moneys for those EPIC programs the PUC has determined should be administered by the Energy Commission for deposit in the fund.
Existing law requires the Energy Commission, in administering moneys in the fund for research, development, and demonstration programs, to develop and implement the EPIC program for the purpose of awarding funds to projects that may lead to technological advancement and breakthroughs to overcome barriers that prevent the achievement of the states statutory energy goals and that may result in a portfolio of projects that are strategically focused and sufficiently narrow to make advancement on the most significant technological challenges. Existing law, until January 1, 2023, requires the Energy Commission to expend certain percentages of the moneys appropriated from the fund for technology demonstration and deployment at sites that benefit certain communities.
This bill would require the Energy Commission to allocate not less than 20% of the funds appropriated consider, in the investment planning process for the EPIC program to program, bioenergy projects for biomass conversion, as specified.
The California Constitution establishes the Public Utilities Commission (PUC), with jurisdiction over all public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing decisions of the PUC institute an Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) to fund renewable energy and research, development, and demonstration programs.
Existing law creates in the State Treasury the Electric Program Investment Charge Fund to be administered by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) and requires the PUC to forward to the Energy Commission, at least quarterly, moneys for those EPIC programs the PUC has determined should be administered by the Energy Commission for deposit in the fund.
Existing law requires the Energy Commission, in administering moneys in the fund for research, development, and demonstration programs, to develop and implement the EPIC program for the purpose of awarding funds to projects that may lead to technological advancement and breakthroughs to overcome barriers that prevent the achievement of the states statutory energy goals and that may result in a portfolio of projects that are strategically focused and sufficiently narrow to make advancement on the most significant technological challenges. Existing law, until January 1, 2023, requires the Energy Commission to expend certain percentages of the moneys appropriated from the fund for technology demonstration and deployment at sites that benefit certain communities.
This bill would require the Energy Commission to allocate not less than 20% of the funds appropriated for the EPIC program to bioenergy projects for biomass conversion, as defined. specified.
The California Constitution establishes the Public Utilities Commission (PUC), with jurisdiction over all public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing decisions of the PUC institute an Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) to fund renewable energy and research, development, and demonstration programs.
Existing law creates in the State Treasury the Electric Program Investment Charge Fund to be administered by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) and requires the PUC to forward to the Energy Commission, at least quarterly, moneys for those EPIC programs the PUC has determined should be administered by the Energy Commission for deposit in the fund.
Existing law requires the Energy Commission, in administering moneys in the fund for research, development, and demonstration programs, to develop and implement the EPIC program for the purpose of awarding funds to projects that may lead to technological advancement and breakthroughs to overcome barriers that prevent the achievement of the states statutory energy goals and that may result in a portfolio of projects that are strategically focused and sufficiently narrow to make advancement on the most significant technological challenges. Existing law, until January 1, 2023, requires the Energy Commission to expend certain percentages of the moneys appropriated from the fund for technology demonstration and deployment at sites that benefit certain communities.
This bill would require the Energy Commission to allocate not less than 20% of the funds appropriated for the EPIC program to bioenergy projects for biomass conversion, as defined.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)Open burning of forest and agricultural waste is a significant source of air pollution and climate pollution, including short-lived climate pollutants, such as black carbon and methane.
(b)State policy to reduce wildfire risks and restore healthy forests and the Agreement for Shared Stewardship of Californias Forests and Rangelands between the State of California and the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, require forest fuel removal on one million acres per year, which will generate millions of tons of forest waste annually.
(c)According to the 2017 Integrated Energy Policy Report, the majority of Californias organic landfill waste is cellulosic biomass that must be converted to energy or mulch to meet the requirements of Section 39730.6 of the Health and Safety Code.
(d)According to the California Forest Carbon Plan adopted by the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Natural Resources Agency, bioenergy cuts black carbon, methane, and particulate matter emissions by 98 percent compared to open burning.
(e)The State Board of Forestry and Fire Protections Forest Biomass Utilization Plan recommends allocating 20 percent of Electric Program Investment Charge funding to forest biomass conversion to energy, with priority going to advanced technology projects.
(f)The State Air Resources Boards plan to phase out open burning of agricultural waste in the San Joaquin Valley calls for public investment of $15,000,000 to $30,000,000, inclusive, annually in new bioenergy facilities and other alternatives to open burning of agricultural waste.
(g)Investing Electric Program Investment Charge funding in new and emerging technologies to convert waste biomass to energy, as well as advanced technology emissions controls, will increase the ratepayer, environmental, and public safety benefits of biomass conversion.
SEC. 2.Section 25711.9 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:25711.9.(a)The commission shall consider, in the investment planning process for the Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) program, funding for eligible biomass conversion, as defined in Section 40106, to energy projects using new and emerging technologies that maximize ratepayer and public benefits.
(b)In determining the appropriate amount of EPIC funding for biomass conversion, the commission shall consider the recommendations of the State Air Resources Board and the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, and shall coordinate with the Natural Resources Agency, the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, and the Department of Food and Agriculture about the need for biomass conversion.
(c)The commission shall also consider opportunities to reduce short-lived climate pollutant emissions, generate carbon negative emissions, reduce wildfire impacts, and increase energy reliability.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)Open burning of forest and agricultural waste is a significant source of air pollution and climate pollution, including short-lived climate pollutants, such as black carbon and methane.
(b)State policy to reduce wildfire risks and restore healthy forests and the Agreement for Shared Stewardship of Californias Forests and Rangelands between the State of California and the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, require forest fuel removal on one million acres per year, which will generate millions of tons of forest waste annually.
(c)According to the 2017 Integrated Energy Policy Report, the majority of Californias organic landfill waste is cellulosic biomass that must be converted to energy or mulch to meet the requirements of Section 39730.6 of the Health and Safety Code.
(d)According to the California Forest Carbon Plan adopted by the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Natural Resources Agency, bioenergy cuts black carbon, methane, and particulate matter emissions by 98 percent compared to open burning.
(e)The State Board of Forestry and Fire Protections Forest Biomass Utilization Plan recommends allocating 20 percent of Electric Program Investment Charge funding to forest biomass conversion to energy, with priority going to advanced technology projects.
(f)The State Air Resources Boards plan to phase out open burning of agricultural waste in the San Joaquin Valley calls for public investment of $15,000,000 to $30,000,000, inclusive, annually in new bioenergy facilities and other alternatives to open burning of agricultural waste.
(g)Investing Electric Program Investment Charge funding in new and emerging technologies to convert waste biomass to energy, as well as advanced technology emissions controls, will increase the ratepayer, environmental, and public safety benefits of biomass conversion.
SEC. 2.Section 25711.9 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:25711.9.(a)The commission shall consider, in the investment planning process for the Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) program, funding for eligible biomass conversion, as defined in Section 40106, to energy projects using new and emerging technologies that maximize ratepayer and public benefits.
(b)In determining the appropriate amount of EPIC funding for biomass conversion, the commission shall consider the recommendations of the State Air Resources Board and the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, and shall coordinate with the Natural Resources Agency, the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, and the Department of Food and Agriculture about the need for biomass conversion.
(c)The commission shall also consider opportunities to reduce short-lived climate pollutant emissions, generate carbon negative emissions, reduce wildfire impacts, and increase energy reliability.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)Open burning of forest and agricultural waste is a significant source of air pollution and climate pollution, including short-lived climate pollutants pollutants, such as black carbon and methane.
(b)State policy to reduce wildfire risks and restore healthy forests and the Agreement for Shared Stewardship of Californias Forests and Rangelands between the State of California and the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, require forest fuel removal on one million acres per year, which will generate millions of tons of forest waste annually.
(c)According to the 2017 Integrated Energy Policy Report, the majority of Californias organic landfill waste is cellulosic biomass that must be converted to energy or mulch to meet the requirements of Section 39730.6 of the Health and Safety Code.
(d)According to the California Forest Carbon Plan adopted by the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Natural Resources Agency, bioenergy cuts black carbon, methane, and particulate matter emissions by 98 percent compared to open burning.
(e)The State Board of Forestry and Fire Protections Forest Biomass Utilization Plan recommends allocating 20 percent of Electric Program Investment Charge funding to forest biomass conversion to energy, with priority going to advanced technology projects.
(f)The State Air Resources Boards plan to phase out open burning of agricultural waste in the San Joaquin Valley calls for public investment of $15,000,000 to $30,000,000, inclusive, annually in new bioenergy facilities and other alternatives to open burning of agricultural waste.
(g)Investing Electric Program Investment Charge funding in new and emerging technologies to convert waste biomass to energy, as well as advanced technology emissions controls, will increase the ratepayer, environmental, and public safety benefits of biomass conversion.
SEC. 2.Section 25711.9 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:25711.9.(a)The commission shall consider, in the investment planning process for the Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) program, funding for eligible biomass conversion, as defined in Section 40106, to energy projects using new and emerging technologies that maximize ratepayer and public benefits.
(b)In determining the appropriate amount of EPIC funding for biomass conversion, the commission shall consider the recommendations of the State Air Resources Board and the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, and shall coordinate with the Natural Resources Agency, the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, and the Department of Food and Agriculture about the need for biomass conversion.
(c)The commission shall also consider opportunities to reduce short-lived climate pollutant emissions, generate carbon negative emissions, reduce wildfire impacts, and increase energy reliability.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)Open burning of forest and agricultural waste is a significant source of air pollution and climate pollution, including short-lived climate pollutants such as black carbon and methane.
(b)State policy to reduce wildfire risks and restore healthy forests and the Agreement for Shared Stewardship of Californias Forests and Rangelands between the State of California and the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, require forest fuel removal on one million acres per year, which will generate millions of tons of forest waste annually.
(c)According to the 2017 Integrated Energy Policy Report, the majority of Californias organic landfill waste is cellulosic biomass that must be converted to energy or mulch to meet the requirements of Section 39730.6 of the Health and Safety Code.
(d)According to the California Forest Carbon Plan adopted by the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Natural Resources Agency, bioenergy cuts black carbon, methane, and particulate matter emissions by 98 percent compared to open burning.
(e)The State Board of Forestry and Fire Protections Forest Biomass Utilization Plan and the State recommends allocating 20 percent of Electric Program Investment Charge funding to forest biomass conversion to energy, with priority going to advanced technology projects.
(f)The State Air Resources Boards plan to phase out open burning of agricultural waste in the San Joaquin Valley both call for increased funding for biomass conversion and investment in new and emerging technologies to maximize the benefits of biomass conversion. calls for public investment of $15,000,000 to $30,000,000, inclusive, annually in new bioenergy facilities and other alternatives to open burning of agricultural waste.
(f)(g)Investing Electric Program Investment Charge funding in new and emerging technologies to convert waste biomass to energy, as well as advanced technology emissions controls, will increase the ratepayer, environmental, and public safety benefits of biomass conversion.
SEC. 2.Section 25711.9 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:25711.9.(a)The commission shall consider, in the investment planning process for the Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) program, bioenergy projects for biomass conversion, funding for eligible biomass conversion, as defined in Section 40106, to energy projects using new and emerging technologies that maximize ratepayer and public benefits.
(b)In determining the appropriate amount of EPIC funding for biomass conversion, the commission shall consider the recommendations of the State Air Resources Board and the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, and shall coordinate with the Natural Resources Agency, the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, and the Department of Food and Agriculture about the need for biomass conversion.
(c)The commission shall also consider opportunities to reduce short-lived climate pollutant emissions, generate carbon negative emissions, reduce wildfire impacts, and increase energy reliability.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)Open burning of forest and agricultural waste is a significant source of air pollution and climate pollution, including short-lived climate pollutants such as black carbon and methane.
(b)State policy to reduce wildfire risks and restore healthy forests and the Agreement for Shared Stewardship of Californias Forests and Rangelands between the State of California and the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, require forest fuel removal on one million acres per year, which will generate millions of tons of forest waste annually.
(c)According to the 2017 Integrated Energy Policy Report, the majority of Californias organic landfill waste is cellulosic biomass that must be converted to energy or mulch to meet the requirements of Section 39730.6 of the Health and Safety Code.
(d)According to the California Forest Carbon Plan adopted by the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Natural Resources Agency, bioenergy cuts black carbon, methane, and particulate matter emissions by 98 percent compared to open burning.
(e)The State Board of Forestry and Fire Protections Forest Biomass Utilization Plan and the State Air Resources Boards plan to phase out open burning of agricultural waste in the San Joaquin Valley both call for increased funding for biomass conversion and investment in new and emerging technologies to maximize the benefits of biomass conversion.
(f)Investing Electric Program Investment Charge funding in new and emerging technologies to convert waste biomass to energy, as well as advanced technology emissions controls, will increase the ratepayer, environmental, and public safety benefits of biomass conversion.
SEC. 2.Section 25711.9 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:25711.9.(a)The commission shall allocate not less than 20 percent of funds appropriated to the commission consider, in the investment planning process for the Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) program to program, bioenergy projects for biomass conversion, as defined in Section 40106, using new and emerging technologies that maximize ratepayer and public benefits.
(b)The commission shall give preference to a bioenergy project that is any of the following:(1)The project uses noncombustion conversion technology.(2)The project converts biomass feedstock that would otherwise be burned.(3)The project produces hydrogen or biogas for use in noncombustion generation technology.(4)The project is carbon negative on a life-cycle basis.(5)The project generates combined heat and power.(6)The project uses advanced technology emissions controls.The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)Open burning of forest and agricultural waste is a significant source of air pollution and climate pollution, including short-lived climate pollutants such as black carbon and methane.
(b)State policy to reduce wildfire risks and restore healthy forests and the Agreement for Shared Stewardship of Californias Forests and Rangelands between the State of California and the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, require forest fuel removal on one million acres per year, which will generate millions of tons of forest waste annually.
(c)According to the 2017 Integrated Energy Policy Report, the majority of Californias organic landfill waste is cellulosic biomass that must be converted to energy or mulch to meet the requirements of Section 39730.6 of the Health and Safety Code.
(d)According to the California Forest Carbon Plan adopted by the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Natural Resources Agency, bioenergy cuts black carbon, methane, and particulate matter emissions by 98 percent compared to open burning.
(e)The State Board of Forestry and Fire Protections Forest Biomass Utilization Plan and the State Air Resources Boards plan to phase out open burning of agricultural waste in the San Joaquin Valley both call for increased funding for biomass conversion and investment in new and emerging technologies to maximize the benefits of biomass conversion.
(f)Investing Electric Program Investment Charge funding in new and emerging technologies to convert waste biomass to energy, as well as advanced technology emissions controls, will increase the ratepayer, environmental, and public safety benefits of biomass conversion.
SECTION 1.SEC. 2.Section 25711.9 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:25711.9.(a)The commission shall allocate not less than 20 percent of funds appropriated to the commission for the Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) program to bioenergy projects for biomass conversion, as defined in Section 40106. 40106, using new and emerging technologies that maximize ratepayer and public benefits.
(b)The commission shall give preference to a bioenergy project that is any of the following:
(1)The project uses noncombustion conversion technology.
(2)The project converts biomass feedstock that would otherwise be burned.
(3)The project produces hydrogen or biogas for use in fuel cells. noncombustion generation technology.
(4)The project is carbon negative on a life-cycle basis.
(5)The project generates combined heat and power.
(6)The project uses advanced technology emissions controls.
(a)The commission shall allocate not less than 20 percent of funds appropriated for the Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) program to bioenergy projects for biomass conversion, as defined in Section 40106.
(b)The commission shall give preference to a bioenergy project that is any of the following:
(1)The project uses noncombustion conversion technology.
(2)The project converts biomass feedstock that would otherwise be burned.
(3)The project produces hydrogen or biogas for use in fuel cells.
(4)The project is carbon negative on a life-cycle basis.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2021 | Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 229, Statutes of 2021. |
| Sep 23, 2021 | Approved by the Governor. |
| Sep 8, 2021 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m. |
| Sep 1, 2021 | Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 58. Noes 17. Page 2625.) |
| Aug 31, 2021 | In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77. |
| Aug 30, 2021 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2228.). |
| Aug 19, 2021 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Aug 18, 2021 | Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading. |
| Aug 16, 2021 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Jul 15, 2021 | From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8. |
| Jul 6, 2021 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 1.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Jun 24, 2021 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U. & C. |
| Jun 3, 2021 | Referred to Com. on E., U. & C. |
| May 20, 2021 | In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. |
| May 20, 2021 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1469.) |
| May 13, 2021 | Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar. |
| May 12, 2021 | From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 12). |
| Apr 29, 2021 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Apr 13, 2021 | Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES. |
| Apr 12, 2021 | Read second time and amended. |
| Apr 8, 2021 | From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 7). |
| Mar 22, 2021 | Re-referred to Com. on U. & E. |
| Mar 18, 2021 | From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on U. & E. Read second time and amended. |
| Feb 12, 2021 | Referred to Coms. on U. & E. and NAT. RES. |
| Jan 27, 2021 | From printer. May be heard in committee February 26. |
| Jan 26, 2021 | Read first time. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2021 | AB 322 Salas Concurrence in Senate Amendments | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Aug 30, 2021 | Assembly 3rd Reading AB322 Salas et al. By Eggman | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| May 20, 2021 | AB 322 Salas Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):
