SB 654: Child custody.
- Session Year: 2021-2022
- House: Senate
- Latest Version Date: 2021-10-09
Existing law requires the court to consider, and give due weight to, the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody or visitation if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation.
This bill would prohibit the court from permitting a child addressing the court regarding custody or visitation to do so in the presence of the parties unless the court determines that doing so is in the best interests of the child and states its reasons for that finding on the record. The bill would require the court to provide an alternative to having the child address the court in the presence of the parties in order to obtain input directly from the child. The bill would also require, if a child informs the minors counsel, an evaluator, an investigator, or a child custody recommending counselor that the child has changed their choice with respect to addressing the court, the minors counsel, evaluator, investigator, or child custody recommending counselor indicate to the judge, the parties or their attorneys, and other professionals serving on the case that the child has changed their preference. By imposing additional duties on local officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the Judicial Council, no later than January 1, 2023, to develop or amend rules as necessary to implement these provisions.
Existing law requires, when an allegation about a parent relating to a history of abuse or substance abuse by the parent has been brought to the attention of the court in the current proceeding, the court to state its reasons in writing or on the record if the court makes an order for sole or joint custody to that parent.
This bill would also require the court in those circumstances to state its reasons in writing or on the record if the court makes an order for unsupervised visitations to that parent.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Existing law requires the court to consider, and give due weight to, the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody or visitation if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation.
This bill would prohibit the court from permitting a child addressing the court regarding custody or visitation to do so in the presence of the parties unless the court determines that doing so is in the best interests of the child and states its reasons for that finding on the record. The bill would require the court to provide an alternative to having the child address the court in the presence of the parties in order to obtain input directly from the child. The bill would also require, if a child informs the minors counsel, an evaluator, an investigator, or a child custody recommending counselor that the child has changed their choice with respect to addressing the court, the minors counsel, evaluator, investigator, or child custody recommending counselor indicate to the judge, the parties or their attorneys, and other professionals serving on the case that the child has changed their preference. By imposing additional duties on local officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the Judicial Council, no later than January 1, 2023, to develop or amend rules as necessary to implement these provisions.
Existing law requires, when an allegation about a parent relating to a history of abuse or substance abuse by the parent has been brought to the attention of the court in the current proceeding, the court to state its reasons in writing or on the record if the court makes an order for sole or joint custody to that parent.
This bill would also require the court in those circumstances to state its reasons in writing or on the record if the court makes an order for unsupervised visitations to that parent.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Existing law requires the court to consider, and give due weight to, the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody or visitation if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation.
This bill would prohibit the court from permitting a child addressing the court regarding custody or visitation to do so in the presence of the parties unless the court determines that doing so is in the best interests of the child and states its reasons for that finding on the record. The bill would require the court to provide an alternative to having the child address the court in the presence of the parties in order to obtain input directly from the child. The bill would also require, if a child informs an attorney, child custody recommending counselor, investigator, evaluator, or other court-connected professional the minors counsel, an evaluator, an investigator, or a child custody recommending counselor that the child has changed their choice with respect to addressing the court, the professional to minors counsel, evaluator, investigator, or child custody recommending counselor indicate to the judge judge, the parties or their attorneys, and other professionals serving on the case that the child has changed their preference. By imposing additional duties on local officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the Judicial Council, no later than January 1, 2023, to develop or amend rules as necessary to implement these provisions.
Existing law requires, when an allegation about a parent relating to a history of abuse or substance abuse by the parent has been brought to the attention of the court in the current proceeding, the court to state its reasons in writing or on the record if the court makes an order for sole or joint custody to that parent.
This bill would also require the court in those circumstances to state its reasons in writing or on the record if the court makes an order for unsupervised visitations to that parent.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Existing law requires the court to consider, and give due weight to, the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody or visitation if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation.
This bill would prohibit the court from permitting a child addressing the court regarding custody or visitation to do so in the presence of the parties unless the court determines that doing so is in the best interests of the child and states its reasons for that finding on the record. The bill would require the court to provide an alternative to having the child address the court in the presence of the parties in order to obtain input directly from the child. The bill would also require, if a child informs an attorney, child custody recommending counselor, investigator, evaluator, or other court-connected professional that the child has changed their choice with respect to addressing the court, the professional to indicate to the judge that the child has changed their preference. By imposing additional duties on local officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the Judicial Council, no later than January 1, 2023, to develop or amend rules as necessary to implement these provisions.
Existing law requires, when an allegation about a parent relating to a history of abuse or substance abuse by the parent has been brought to the attention of the court in the current proceeding, the court to state its reasons in writing or on the record if the court makes an order for sole or joint custody to that parent.
This bill would also require the court in those circumstances to state its reasons in writing or on the record if the court makes an order for unsupervised visitations to that parent.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Existing law requires the court to consider, and give due weight to, the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody or visitation if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation.
This bill would prohibit the court from permitting a child addressing the court regarding custody or visitation to do so in the presence of the parties unless the court determines that doing so is in the best interests of the child and states its reasons for that finding on the record. The bill would require the court to provide an alternative to having the child address the court in the presence of the parties in order to obtain input directly from the child. The bill would also require, if a child informs an attorney, child custody recommending counselor, investigator, evaluator, or other court-connected professional that the child has changed their choice with respect to addressing the court, the professional to indicate to the judge that the child has changed their preference. By imposing additional duties on local officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing law requires, when an allegation about a parent relating to a history of abuse or substance abuse by the parent has been brought to the attention of the court in the current proceeding, the court to state its reasons in writing or on the record if the court makes an order for sole or joint custody to that parent.
This bill would also require the court in those circumstances to state its reasons in writing or on the record if the court makes an order for unsupervised visitations to that parent.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Existing law requires the court to consider, and give due weight to, the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody or visitation if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation.
This bill would prohibit the court from requiring permitting a child addressing the court regarding custody or visitation to do so in the presence of the parties unless the court determines that doing so is in the best interests of the child and states its reasons for that finding on the record. The bill would require the court to provide an alternative to having the child address the court in the presence of the parties in order to obtain input directly from the child. The bill would also require, if a child informs an attorney, child custody recommending counselor, investigator, evaluator, or other court-connected professional that the child has changed their choice with respect to addressing the court, the professional to indicate to the judge that the child has changed their preference. By imposing additional duties on local officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing law requires, when an allegation about a parent relating to a history of abuse or substance abuse by the parent has been brought to the attention of the court in the current proceeding, the court to state its reasons in writing or on the record if the court makes an order for sole or joint custody to that parent.
This bill would also require the court in those circumstances to state its reasons in writing or on the record if the court makes an order for unsupervised visitations to that parent.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Existing law requires the court to consider, and give due weight to, the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody or visitation if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation. If the child is 14 years of age or older and wishes to address the court regarding custody or visitation, existing law requires the court to permit the child to address the court, unless the court determines that doing so is not in the childs best interests.
This bill would instead require the court to permit a child who is 12 years of age or older to address the court regarding custody or visitation, unless the court determines that doing so is not in the childs best interest. The bill would require the Judicial Council, on or before July 1, 2022, to create a form to be filed with the court to certify that a child has been informed of their right to testify, as specified. The bill would require, among other things, a child custody evaluator, investigator, mediator, or other court-connected professional to inform the child of their right to address the court if the child is interviewed by the child custody evaluator, investigator, mediator, or other court-connected professional. prohibit the court from requiring a child addressing the court regarding custody or visitation to do so in the presence of the parties unless the court determines that doing so is in the best interests of the child and states its reasons for that finding on the record. The bill would require the court to provide an alternative to having the child address the court in the presence of the parties in order to obtain input directly from the child. The bill would also require, if a child informs an attorney, child custody recommending counselor, investigator, evaluator, or other court-connected professional that the child has changed their choice with respect to addressing the court, the professional to indicate to the judge that the child has changed their preference. By imposing additional duties on local officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing law requires, when an allegation about a parent relating to a history of abuse or substance abuse by the parent has been brought to the attention of the court in the current proceeding, the court to state its reasons in writing or on the record if the court makes an order for sole or joint custody to that parent.
This bill would also require the court in those circumstances to state its reasons in writing or on the record if the court makes an order for unsupervised visitations to that parent.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Existing law requires the court to consider, and give due weight to, the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody or visitation if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation. If the child is 14 years of age or older and wishes to address the court regarding custody or visitation, existing law requires the court to permit the child to address the court, unless the court determines that doing so is not in the childs best interests.
This bill would instead require the court to permit a child who is 12 years of age or older to address the court regarding custody or visitation, unless the court determines that doing so is not in the childs best interest. The bill would require the Judicial Council, on or before July 1, 2022, to create a form to be filed with the court to certify that a child has been informed of their right to testify, as specified. The bill would require, among other things, a child custody evaluator, investigator, mediator, or other court-connected professional to inform the child of their right to address the court if the child is interviewed by the child custody evaluator, investigator, mediator, or other court-connected professional. By imposing additional duties on local officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
(a)In making a determination of the best interests of the child in a proceeding described in Section 3021, the court shall, among any other factors it finds relevant and consistent with Section 3020, consider all of the following:
(1)The health, safety, and welfare of the child.
(2)(A)A history of abuse by one parent or any other person seeking custody against any of the following:
(i)A child to whom the parent or person seeking custody is related by blood or affinity or with whom the parent or person seeking custody has had a caretaking relationship, no matter how temporary.
(ii)The other parent.
(iii)A parent, current spouse, or cohabitant, of the parent or person seeking custody, or a person with whom the parent or person seeking custody has a dating or engagement relationship.
(B)As a prerequisite to considering allegations of abuse, the court may require independent corroboration, including, but not limited to, written reports by law enforcement agencies, child protective services or other social welfare agencies, courts, medical facilities, or other public agencies or private nonprofit organizations providing services to victims of sexual assault or domestic violence. As used in this paragraph, abuse against a child means child abuse and neglect as defined in Section 11165.6 of the Penal Code and abuse against any other person described in clause (ii) or (iii) of subparagraph (A) means abuse as defined in Section 6203.
(3)The nature and amount of contact with both parents, except as provided in Section 3046.
(4)The habitual or continual illegal use of controlled substances, the habitual or continual abuse of alcohol, or the habitual or continual abuse of prescribed controlled substances by either parent. Before considering these allegations, the court may first require independent corroboration, including, but not limited to, written reports from law enforcement agencies, courts, probation departments, social welfare agencies, medical facilities, rehabilitation facilities, or other public agencies or nonprofit organizations providing drug and alcohol abuse services. As used in this paragraph, controlled substances has the same meaning as defined in the California Uniform Controlled Substances Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code).
(5)(A)When allegations about a parent pursuant to paragraphs (2) or (4) have been brought to the attention of the court in the current proceeding, and the court makes an order for sole or joint custody or unsupervised visitation to that parent, the court shall state its reasons in writing or on the record. In these circumstances, the court shall ensure that any order regarding custody or visitation is specific as to time, day, place, and manner of transfer of the child as set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 6323.
(B)This paragraph does not apply if the parties stipulate in writing or on the record regarding custody or visitation.
(b)Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the court shall not consider the sex, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation of a parent, legal guardian, or relative in determining the best interests of the child.
SEC. 2.Section 3042 of the Family Code is amended to read:3042.(a)If a child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation, the court shall consider, and give due weight to, the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody or visitation.
(b)In addition to the requirements of subdivision (b) of Section 765 of the Evidence Code, the court shall control the examination of a child witness so as to protect the best interest of the child.
(c)If the child is 14 years of age or older and wishes to address the court regarding custody or visitation, the child shall be permitted to do so, unless the court determines that doing so is not in the childs best interest, in which case, the court shall state its reasons for that finding on the record.
(d)This section does not prevent a child who is less than 14 years of age from addressing the court regarding custody or visitation, if the court determines that is appropriate pursuant to the childs best interest.
(e)If the court precludes the calling of a child as a witness, the court shall provide alternative means of obtaining input from the child and other information regarding the childs preferences.
(f)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), the court shall not permit a child addressing the court regarding custody or visitation to do so in the presence of the parties. The court shall provide an alternative to having the child address the court in the presence of the parties in order to obtain input directly from the child.
(2)Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the court may permit the child addressing the court regarding custody or visitation to do so in the presence of the parties if the court determines that doing so is in the childs best interest and states its reasons for that finding on the record. In determining the childs best interest under this paragraph, the court shall consider whether addressing the court regarding custody or visitation in the presence of the parties is likely to be detrimental to the child.
(g)To assist the court in determining whether the child wishes to express a preference or to provide other input regarding custody or visitation to the court, a minors counsel, an evaluator, an investigator, or a child custody recommending counselor shall indicate to the judge that the child wishes to address the court, or the judge may make that inquiry in the absence of that request. A party or a partys attorney may also indicate to the judge that the child wishes to address the court or judge.
(h)If a child informs the minors counsel, an evaluator, an investigator, or a child custody recommending counselor at any point that the child has changed their choice with respect to addressing the court, the minors counsel, evaluator, investigator, or child custody recommending counselor shall, as soon as feasible, indicate to the judge, the parties or their attorneys, and other professionals serving on the case that the child has changed their preference.
(i)This section does not require the child to express to the court a preference or to provide other input regarding custody or visitation.
(j)The Judicial Council shall, no later than January 1, 2023, develop or amend rules as necessary to implement this section.
SEC. 3.If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(a)In making a determination of the best interests of the child in a proceeding described in Section 3021, the court shall, among any other factors it finds relevant and consistent with Section 3020, consider all of the following:
(1)The health, safety, and welfare of the child.
(2)(A)A history of abuse by one parent or any other person seeking custody against any of the following:
(i)A child to whom the parent or person seeking custody is related by blood or affinity or with whom the parent or person seeking custody has had a caretaking relationship, no matter how temporary.
(ii)The other parent.
(iii)A parent, current spouse, or cohabitant, of the parent or person seeking custody, or a person with whom the parent or person seeking custody has a dating or engagement relationship.
(B)As a prerequisite to considering allegations of abuse, the court may require independent corroboration, including, but not limited to, written reports by law enforcement agencies, child protective services or other social welfare agencies, courts, medical facilities, or other public agencies or private nonprofit organizations providing services to victims of sexual assault or domestic violence. As used in this paragraph, abuse against a child means child abuse and neglect as defined in Section 11165.6 of the Penal Code and abuse against any other person described in clause (ii) or (iii) of subparagraph (A) means abuse as defined in Section 6203.
(3)The nature and amount of contact with both parents, except as provided in Section 3046.
(4)The habitual or continual illegal use of controlled substances, the habitual or continual abuse of alcohol, or the habitual or continual abuse of prescribed controlled substances by either parent. Before considering these allegations, the court may first require independent corroboration, including, but not limited to, written reports from law enforcement agencies, courts, probation departments, social welfare agencies, medical facilities, rehabilitation facilities, or other public agencies or nonprofit organizations providing drug and alcohol abuse services. As used in this paragraph, controlled substances has the same meaning as defined in the California Uniform Controlled Substances Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code).
(5)(A)When allegations about a parent pursuant to paragraphs (2) or (4) have been brought to the attention of the court in the current proceeding, and the court makes an order for sole or joint custody or unsupervised visitation to that parent, the court shall state its reasons in writing or on the record. In these circumstances, the court shall ensure that any order regarding custody or visitation is specific as to time, day, place, and manner of transfer of the child as set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 6323.
(B)This paragraph does not apply if the parties stipulate in writing or on the record regarding custody or visitation.
(b)Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the court shall not consider the sex, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation of a parent, legal guardian, or relative in determining the best interests of the child.
SEC. 2.Section 3042 of the Family Code is amended to read:3042.(a)If a child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation, the court shall consider, and give due weight to, the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody or visitation.
(b)In addition to the requirements of subdivision (b) of Section 765 of the Evidence Code, the court shall control the examination of a child witness so as to protect the best interest of the child.
(c)If the child is 14 years of age or older and wishes to address the court regarding custody or visitation, the child shall be permitted to do so, unless the court determines that doing so is not in the childs best interest, in which case, the court shall state its reasons for that finding on the record.
(d)This section does not prevent a child who is less than 14 years of age from addressing the court regarding custody or visitation, if the court determines that is appropriate pursuant to the childs best interest.
(e)If the court precludes the calling of a child as a witness, the court shall provide alternative means of obtaining input from the child and other information regarding the childs preferences.
(f)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), the court shall not permit a child addressing the court regarding custody or visitation to do so in the presence of the parties. The court shall provide an alternative to having the child address the court in the presence of the parties in order to obtain input directly from the child.
(2)Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the court may permit the child addressing the court regarding custody or visitation to do so in the presence of the parties if the court determines that doing so is in the childs best interest and states its reasons for that finding on the record. In determining the childs best interest under this paragraph, the court shall consider whether addressing the court regarding custody or visitation in the presence of the parties is likely to be detrimental to the child.
(g)To assist the court in determining whether the child wishes to express a preference or to provide other input regarding custody or visitation to the court, a minors counsel, an evaluator, an investigator, or a child custody recommending counselor shall indicate to the judge that the child wishes to address the court, or the judge may make that inquiry in the absence of that request. A party or a partys attorney may also indicate to the judge that the child wishes to address the court or judge.
(h)If a child informs the minors counsel, an evaluator, an investigator, or a child custody recommending counselor at any point that the child has changed their choice with respect to addressing the court, the minors counsel, evaluator, investigator, or child custody recommending counselor shall, as soon as feasible, indicate to the judge, the parties or their attorneys, and other professionals serving on the case that the child has changed their preference.
(i)This section does not require the child to express to the court a preference or to provide other input regarding custody or visitation.
(j)The Judicial Council shall, no later than January 1, 2023, develop or amend rules as necessary to implement this section.
SEC. 3.If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(a)In making a determination of the best interests of the child in a proceeding described in Section 3021, the court shall, among any other factors it finds relevant and consistent with Section 3020, consider all of the following:
(1)The health, safety, and welfare of the child.
(2)(A)A history of abuse by one parent or any other person seeking custody against any of the following:
(i)A child to whom the parent or person seeking custody is related by blood or affinity or with whom the parent or person seeking custody has had a caretaking relationship, no matter how temporary.
(ii)The other parent.
(iii)A parent, current spouse, or cohabitant, of the parent or person seeking custody, or a person with whom the parent or person seeking custody has a dating or engagement relationship.
(B)As a prerequisite to considering allegations of abuse, the court may require independent corroboration, including, but not limited to, written reports by law enforcement agencies, child protective services or other social welfare agencies, courts, medical facilities, or other public agencies or private nonprofit organizations providing services to victims of sexual assault or domestic violence. As used in this paragraph, abuse against a child means child abuse and neglect as defined in Section 11165.6 of the Penal Code and abuse against any other person described in clause (ii) or (iii) of subparagraph (A) means abuse as defined in Section 6203.
(3)The nature and amount of contact with both parents, except as provided in Section 3046.
(4)The habitual or continual illegal use of controlled substances, the habitual or continual abuse of alcohol, or the habitual or continual abuse of prescribed controlled substances by either parent. Before considering these allegations, the court may first require independent corroboration, including, but not limited to, written reports from law enforcement agencies, courts, probation departments, social welfare agencies, medical facilities, rehabilitation facilities, or other public agencies or nonprofit organizations providing drug and alcohol abuse services. As used in this paragraph, controlled substances has the same meaning as defined in the California Uniform Controlled Substances Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code).
(5)(A)When allegations about a parent pursuant to paragraphs (2) or (4) have been brought to the attention of the court in the current proceeding, and the court makes an order for sole or joint custody or unsupervised visitation to that parent, the court shall state its reasons in writing or on the record. In these circumstances, the court shall ensure that any order regarding custody or visitation is specific as to time, day, place, and manner of transfer of the child as set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 6323.
(B)This paragraph does not apply if the parties stipulate in writing or on the record regarding custody or visitation.
(b)Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the court shall not consider the sex, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation of a parent, legal guardian, or relative in determining the best interests of the child.
SEC. 2.Section 3042 of the Family Code is amended to read:3042.(a)If a child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation, the court shall consider, and give due weight to, the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody or visitation.
(b)In addition to the requirements of subdivision (b) of Section 765 of the Evidence Code, the court shall control the examination of a child witness so as to protect the best interest of the child.
(c)If the child is 14 years of age or older and wishes to address the court regarding custody or visitation, the child shall be permitted to do so, unless the court determines that doing so is not in the childs best interest, in which case, the court shall state its reasons for that finding on the record.
(d)This section does not prevent a child who is less than 14 years of age from addressing the court regarding custody or visitation, if the court determines that is appropriate pursuant to the childs best interest.
(e)If the court precludes the calling of a child as a witness, the court shall provide alternative means of obtaining input from the child and other information regarding the childs preferences.
(f)(1)The Except as provided in paragraph (2), the court shall not permit a child addressing the court regarding custody or visitation to do so in the presence of the parties. The court shall provide an alternative to having the child address the court in the presence of the parties in order to obtain input directly from the child.
(2)Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the court may permit the child addressing the court regarding custody or visitation to do so in the presence of the parties if the court determines that doing so is in the childs best interest and states its reasons for that finding on the record. In determining the childs best interest under this paragraph, the court shall consider whether addressing the court regarding custody or visitation in the presence of the parties is likely to cause the child emotional distress. be detrimental to the child.
(g)To assist the court in determining whether the child wishes to express a preference or to provide other input regarding custody or visitation to the court, a minors counsel, an evaluator, an investigator, or a mediator who provides recommendations to the judge pursuant to Section 3183 child custody recommending counselor shall indicate to the judge that the child wishes to address the court, or the judge may make that inquiry in the absence of that request. A party or a partys attorney may also indicate to the judge that the child wishes to address the court or judge.
(h)If a child informs an attorney, child custody recommending counselor, investigator, evaluator, or other court-connected professional the minors counsel, an evaluator, an investigator, or a child custody recommending counselor at any point that the child has changed their choice with respect to addressing the court, the professional minors counsel, evaluator, investigator, or child custody recommending counselor shall, as soon as feasible, indicate to the judge judge, the parties or their attorneys, and other professionals serving on the case that the child has changed their preference.
(i)This section does not require the child to express to the court a preference or to provide other input regarding custody or visitation.
(j)The Judicial Council shall, no later than January 1, 2023, develop or amend rules as necessary to implement this section.
SEC. 3.If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(a)In making a determination of the best interests of the child in a proceeding described in Section 3021, the court shall, among any other factors it finds relevant and consistent with Section 3020, consider all of the following:
(1)The health, safety, and welfare of the child.
(2)(A)A history of abuse by one parent or any other person seeking custody against any of the following:
(i)A child to whom the parent or person seeking custody is related by blood or affinity or with whom the parent or person seeking custody has had a caretaking relationship, no matter how temporary.
(ii)The other parent.
(iii)A parent, current spouse, or cohabitant, of the parent or person seeking custody, or a person with whom the parent or person seeking custody has a dating or engagement relationship.
(B)As a prerequisite to considering allegations of abuse, the court may require independent corroboration, including, but not limited to, written reports by law enforcement agencies, child protective services or other social welfare agencies, courts, medical facilities, or other public agencies or private nonprofit organizations providing services to victims of sexual assault or domestic violence. As used in this paragraph, abuse against a child means child abuse and neglect as defined in Section 11165.6 of the Penal Code and abuse against any other person described in clause (ii) or (iii) of subparagraph (A) means abuse as defined in Section 6203.
(3)The nature and amount of contact with both parents, except as provided in Section 3046.
(4)The habitual or continual illegal use of controlled substances, the habitual or continual abuse of alcohol, or the habitual or continual abuse of prescribed controlled substances by either parent. Before considering these allegations, the court may first require independent corroboration, including, but not limited to, written reports from law enforcement agencies, courts, probation departments, social welfare agencies, medical facilities, rehabilitation facilities, or other public agencies or nonprofit organizations providing drug and alcohol abuse services. As used in this paragraph, controlled substances has the same meaning as defined in the California Uniform Controlled Substances Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code).
(5)(A)When allegations about a parent pursuant to paragraphs (2) or (4) have been brought to the attention of the court in the current proceeding, and the court makes an order for sole or joint custody or unsupervised visitation to that parent, the court shall state its reasons in writing or on the record. In these circumstances, the court shall ensure that any order regarding custody or visitation is specific as to time, day, place, and manner of transfer of the child as set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 6323.
(B)This paragraph does not apply if the parties stipulate in writing or on the record regarding custody or visitation.
(b)Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the court shall not consider the sex, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation of a parent, legal guardian, or relative in determining the best interests of the child.
SEC. 2.Section 3042 of the Family Code is amended to read:3042.(a)If a child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation, the court shall consider, and give due weight to, the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody or visitation.
(b)In addition to the requirements of subdivision (b) of Section 765 of the Evidence Code, the court shall control the examination of a child witness so as to protect the best interest of the child.
(c)If the child is 14 years of age or older and wishes to address the court regarding custody or visitation, the child shall be permitted to do so, unless the court determines that doing so is not in the childs best interest, in which case, the court shall state its reasons for that finding on the record.
(d)This section does not prevent a child who is less than 14 years of age from addressing the court regarding custody or visitation, if the court determines that is appropriate pursuant to the childs best interest.
(e)If the court precludes the calling of a child as a witness, the court shall provide alternative means of obtaining input from the child and other information regarding the childs preferences.
(f)(1)The court shall not permit a child addressing the court regarding custody or visitation to do so in the presence of the parties. The court shall provide an alternative to having the child address the court in the presence of the parties in order to obtain input directly from the child.
(2)Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the court may permit the child addressing the court regarding custody or visitation to do so in the presence of the parties if the court determines that doing so is in the childs best interest and states its reasons for that finding on the record. In determining the childs best interest under this paragraph, the court shall consider whether addressing the court regarding custody or visitation in the presence of the parties is likely to cause the child emotional distress.
(g)To assist the court in determining whether the child wishes to express a preference or to provide other input regarding custody or visitation to the court, a minors counsel, an evaluator, an investigator, or a mediator who provides recommendations to the judge pursuant to Section 3183 shall indicate to the judge that the child wishes to address the court, or the judge may make that inquiry in the absence of that request. A party or a partys attorney may also indicate to the judge that the child wishes to address the court or judge.
(h)If a child informs an attorney, child custody recommending counselor, investigator, evaluator, or other court-connected professional at any point that the child has changed their choice with respect to addressing the court, the professional shall, as soon as feasible, indicate to the judge that the child has changed their preference.
(i)This section does not require the child to express to the court a preference or to provide other input regarding custody or visitation.
(j)The Judicial Council shall, no later than January 1, 2023, develop or amend rules as necessary to implement this section.
SEC. 3.If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(a)In making a determination of the best interests of the child in a proceeding described in Section 3021, the court shall, among any other factors it finds relevant and consistent with Section 3020, consider all of the following:
(1)The health, safety, and welfare of the child.
(2)(A)A history of abuse by one parent or any other person seeking custody against any of the following:
(i)A child to whom the parent or person seeking custody is related by blood or affinity or with whom the parent or person seeking custody has had a caretaking relationship, no matter how temporary.
(ii)The other parent.
(iii)A parent, current spouse, or cohabitant, of the parent or person seeking custody, or a person with whom the parent or person seeking custody has a dating or engagement relationship.
(B)As a prerequisite to considering allegations of abuse, the court may require independent corroboration, including, but not limited to, written reports by law enforcement agencies, child protective services or other social welfare agencies, courts, medical facilities, or other public agencies or private nonprofit organizations providing services to victims of sexual assault or domestic violence. As used in this paragraph, abuse against a child means child abuse and neglect as defined in Section 11165.6 of the Penal Code and abuse against any of the other persons other person described in clause (ii) or (iii) of subparagraph (A) means abuse as defined in Section 6203.
(3)The nature and amount of contact with both parents, except as provided in Section 3046.
(4)The habitual or continual illegal use of controlled substances, the habitual or continual abuse of alcohol, or the habitual or continual abuse of prescribed controlled substances by either parent. Before considering these allegations, the court may first require independent corroboration, including, but not limited to, written reports from law enforcement agencies, courts, probation departments, social welfare agencies, medical facilities, rehabilitation facilities, or other public agencies or nonprofit organizations providing drug and alcohol abuse services. As used in this paragraph, controlled substances has the same meaning as defined in the California Uniform Controlled Substances Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code).
(5)(A)When allegations about a parent pursuant to paragraphs (2) or (4) have been brought to the attention of the court in the current proceeding, and the court makes an order for sole or joint custody or unsupervised visitation to that parent, the court shall state its reasons in writing or on the record. In these circumstances, the court shall ensure that any order regarding custody or visitation is specific as to time, day, place, and manner of transfer of the child as set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 6323.
(B)This paragraph does not apply if the parties stipulate in writing or on the record regarding custody or visitation.
(b)Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the court shall not consider the sex, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation of a parent, legal guardian, or relative in determining the best interests of the child.
SEC. 2.Section 3042 of the Family Code is amended to read:3042.(a)If a child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation, the court shall consider, and give due weight to, the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody or visitation.
(b)In addition to the requirements of subdivision (b) of Section 765 of the Evidence Code, the court shall control the examination of a child witness so as to protect the best interest of the child.
(c)If the child is 14 years of age or older and wishes to address the court regarding custody or visitation, the child shall be permitted to do so, unless the court determines that doing so is not in the childs best interest, in which case, the court shall state its reasons for that finding on the record.
(d)This section does not prevent a child who is less than 14 years of age from addressing the court regarding custody or visitation, if the court determines that is appropriate pursuant to the childs best interest.
(e)If the court precludes the calling of a child as a witness, the court shall provide alternative means of obtaining input from the child and other information regarding the childs preferences.
(f)(1)The court shall not permit a child addressing the court regarding custody or visitation to do so in the presence of the parties. The court shall provide an alternative to having the child address the court in the presence of the parties in order to obtain input directly from the child.
(2)Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the court may permit the child addressing the court regarding custody or visitation to do so in the presence of the parties if the court determines that doing so is in the childs best interest and states its reasons for that finding on the record. In determining the childs best interest under this paragraph, the court shall consider whether addressing the court regarding custody or visitation in the presence of the parties is likely to cause the child emotional distress.
(g)To assist the court in determining whether the child wishes to express a preference or to provide other input regarding custody or visitation to the court, a minors counsel, an evaluator, an investigator, or a mediator who provides recommendations to the judge pursuant to Section 3183 shall indicate to the judge that the child wishes to address the court, or the judge may make that inquiry in the absence of that request. A party or a partys attorney may also indicate to the judge that the child wishes to address the court or judge.
(h)If a child informs an attorney, child custody recommending counselor, investigator, evaluator, or other court-connected professional at any point that the child has changed their choice with respect to addressing the court, the professional shall, as soon as feasible, indicate to the judge that the child has changed their preference.
(i)This section does not require the child to express to the court a preference or to provide other input regarding custody or visitation.
SEC. 3.If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(a)In making a determination of the best interests of the child in a proceeding described in Section 3021, the court shall, among any other factors it finds relevant and consistent with Section 3020, consider all of the following:
(1)The health, safety, and welfare of the child.
(2)(A)A history of abuse by one parent or any other person seeking custody against any of the following:
(i)A child to whom the parent or person seeking custody is related by blood or affinity or with whom the parent or person seeking custody has had a caretaking relationship, no matter how temporary.
(ii)The other parent.
(iii)A parent, current spouse, or cohabitant, of the parent or person seeking custody, or a person with whom the parent or person seeking custody has a dating or engagement relationship.
(B)As a prerequisite to considering allegations of abuse, the court may require independent corroboration, including, but not limited to, written reports by law enforcement agencies, child protective services or other social welfare agencies, courts, medical facilities, or other public agencies or private nonprofit organizations providing services to victims of sexual assault or domestic violence. As used in this paragraph, abuse against a child means child abuse and neglect as defined in Section 11165.6 of the Penal Code and abuse against any of the other persons described in clause (ii) or (iii) of subparagraph (A) means abuse as defined in Section 6203.
(3)The nature and amount of contact with both parents, except as provided in Section 3046.
(4)The habitual or continual illegal use of controlled substances, the habitual or continual abuse of alcohol, or the habitual or continual abuse of prescribed controlled substances by either parent. Before considering these allegations, the court may first require independent corroboration, including, but not limited to, written reports from law enforcement agencies, courts, probation departments, social welfare agencies, medical facilities, rehabilitation facilities, or other public agencies or nonprofit organizations providing drug and alcohol abuse services. As used in this paragraph, controlled substances has the same meaning as defined in the California Uniform Controlled Substances Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code).
(5)(A)When allegations about a parent pursuant to paragraphs (2) or (4) have been brought to the attention of the court in the current proceeding, and the court makes an order for sole or joint custody or unsupervised visitation to that parent, the court shall state its reasons in writing or on the record. In these circumstances, the court shall ensure that any order regarding custody or visitation is specific as to time, day, place, and manner of transfer of the child as set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 6323.
(B)This paragraph does not apply if the parties stipulate in writing or on the record regarding custody or visitation.
(b)Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the court shall not consider the sex, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation of a parent, legal guardian, or relative in determining the best interests of the child.
SEC. 2.Section 3042 of the Family Code is amended to read:3042.(a)If a child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation, the court shall consider, and give due weight to, the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody or visitation.
(b)In addition to the requirements of subdivision (b) of Section 765 of the Evidence Code, the court shall control the examination of a child witness so as to protect the best interest of the child.
(c)If the child is 14 years of age or older and wishes to address the court regarding custody or visitation, the child shall be permitted to do so, unless the court determines that doing so is not in the childs best interest, in which case, the court shall state its reasons for that finding on the record.
(d)This section does not prevent a child who is less than 14 years of age from addressing the court regarding custody or visitation, if the court determines that is appropriate pursuant to the childs best interest.
(e)If the court precludes the calling of a child as a witness, the court shall provide alternative means of obtaining input from the child and other information regarding the childs preferences.
(f)(1)The court shall not require permit a child addressing the court regarding custody or visitation to do so in the presence of the parties. The court shall provide an alternative to having the child address the court in the presence of the parties in order to obtain input directly from the child.
(2)Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the court may require permit the child addressing the court regarding custody or visitation to do so in the presence of the parties if the court determines that doing so is in the childs best interest and states its reasons for that finding on the record. In determining the childs best interest under this paragraph, the court shall consider whether addressing the court regarding custody or visitation in the presence of the parties is likely to cause the child emotional distress.
(g)To assist the court in determining whether the child wishes to express a preference or to provide other input regarding custody or visitation to the court, a minors counsel, an evaluator, an investigator, or a mediator who provides recommendations to the judge pursuant to Section 3183 shall indicate to the judge that the child wishes to address the court, or the judge may make that inquiry in the absence of that request. A party or a partys attorney may also indicate to the judge that the child wishes to address the court or judge.
(h)If a child informs an attorney, child custody recommending counselor, investigator, evaluator, or other court-connected professional at any point that the child has changed their choice with respect to addressing the court, the professional shall, as soon as feasible, indicate to the judge that the child has changed their preference.
(i)This section does not require the child to express to the court a preference or to provide other input regarding custody or visitation.
(j)The Judicial Council shall, no later than January 1, 2012, promulgate a rule of court establishing procedures for the examination of a child witness, and include guidelines on methods other than direct testimony for obtaining information or other input from the child regarding custody or visitation.SEC. 3.If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(a)In making a determination of the best interests of the child in a proceeding described in Section 3021, the court shall, among any other factors it finds relevant and consistent with Section 3020, consider all of the following:
(1)The health, safety, and welfare of the child.
(2)(A)A history of abuse by one parent or any other person seeking custody against any of the following:
(i)A child to whom the parent or person seeking custody is related by blood or affinity or with whom the parent or person seeking custody has had a caretaking relationship, no matter how temporary.
(ii)The other parent.
(iii)A parent, current spouse, or cohabitant, of the parent or person seeking custody, or a person with whom the parent or person seeking custody has a dating or engagement relationship.
(B)As a prerequisite to considering allegations of abuse, the court may require independent corroboration, including, but not limited to, written reports by law enforcement agencies, child protective services or other social welfare agencies, courts, medical facilities, or other public agencies or private nonprofit organizations providing services to victims of sexual assault or domestic violence. As used in this paragraph, abuse against a child means child abuse and neglect as defined in Section 11165.6 of the Penal Code and abuse against any of the other persons described in clause (ii) or (iii) of subparagraph (A) means abuse as defined in Section 6203.
(3)The nature and amount of contact with both parents, except as provided in Section 3046.
(4)The habitual or continual illegal use of controlled substances, the habitual or continual abuse of alcohol, or the habitual or continual abuse of prescribed controlled substances by either parent. Before considering these allegations, the court may first require independent corroboration, including, but not limited to, written reports from law enforcement agencies, courts, probation departments, social welfare agencies, medical facilities, rehabilitation facilities, or other public agencies or nonprofit organizations providing drug and alcohol abuse services. As used in this paragraph, controlled substances has the same meaning as defined in the California Uniform Controlled Substances Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code).
(5)(A)When allegations about a parent pursuant to paragraphs (2) or (4) have been brought to the attention of the court in the current proceeding, and the court makes an order for sole or joint custody or unsupervised visitation to that parent, the court shall state its reasons in writing or on the record. In these circumstances, the court shall ensure that any order regarding custody or visitation is specific as to time, day, place, and manner of transfer of the child as set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 6323.
(B)This paragraph does not apply if the parties stipulate in writing or on the record regarding custody or visitation.
(b)Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the court shall not consider the sex, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation of a parent, legal guardian, or relative in determining the best interests of the child.
SEC. 2.Section 3042 of the Family Code is amended to read:3042.(a)If a child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation, the court shall consider, and give due weight to, the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody or visitation.
(b)In addition to the requirements of subdivision (b) of Section 765 of the Evidence Code, the court shall control the examination of a child witness so as to protect the best interest of the child.
(c)If the child is 14 years of age or older and wishes to address the court regarding custody or visitation, the child shall be permitted to do so, unless the court determines that doing so is not in the childs best interest, in which case, the court shall state its reasons for that finding on the record.
(d)This section does not prevent a child who is less than 14 years of age from addressing the court regarding custody or visitation, if the court determines that is appropriate pursuant to the childs best interest.
(e)If the court precludes the calling of a child as a witness, the court shall provide alternative means of obtaining input from the child and other information regarding the childs preferences.
(f)(1)The court shall not require a child addressing the court regarding custody or visitation to do so in the presence of the parties. The court shall provide an alternative to having the child address the court in the presence of the parties in order to obtain input directly from the child.
(2)Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the court may require the child addressing the court regarding custody or visitation to do so in the presence of the parties if the court determines that doing so is in the childs best interest and states its reasons for that finding on the record. In determining the childs best interest under this paragraph, the court shall consider whether addressing the court regarding custody or visitation in the presence of the parties is likely to cause the child emotional distress.
(f)(g)To assist the court in determining whether the child wishes to express a preference or to provide other input regarding custody or visitation to the court, a minors counsel, an evaluator, an investigator, or a mediator who provides recommendations to the judge pursuant to Section 3183 shall indicate to the judge that the child wishes to address the court, or the judge may make that inquiry in the absence of that request. A party or a partys attorney may also indicate to the judge that the child wishes to address the court or judge.
(h)If a child informs an attorney, child custody recommending counselor, investigator, evaluator, or other court-connected professional at any point that the child has changed their choice with respect to addressing the court, the professional shall, as soon as feasible, indicate to the judge that the child has changed their preference.
(g)(i)This section does not require the child to express to the court a preference or to provide other input regarding custody or visitation.
(h)(j)The Judicial Council shall, no later than January 1, 2012, promulgate a rule of court establishing procedures for the examination of a child witness, and include guidelines on methods other than direct testimony for obtaining information or other input from the child regarding custody or visitation.
(i)The changes made to subdivisions (a) to (g), inclusive, by the act adding this subdivision shall become operative on January 1, 2012.SEC. 2.SEC. 3.If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(a)If a child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation, the court shall consider, and give due weight to, the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody or visitation.
(b)In addition to the requirements of subdivision (b) of Section 765 of the Evidence Code, the court shall control the examination of a child witness so as to protect the best interest of the child.
(c)If the child is 14 12 years of age or older and wishes to address the court regarding custody or visitation, the child shall be permitted to do so, unless the court determines that doing so is not in the childs best interest, in which case, the court shall state its reasons for that finding on the record.
(d)This section does not prevent a child who is less than 14 12 years of age from addressing the court regarding custody or visitation, if the court determines that is appropriate pursuant to the childs best interest.
(e)If the court precludes the calling of a child as a witness, the court shall provide alternative means of obtaining input from the child and other information regarding the childs preferences.
(f)To assist the court in determining whether the child wishes to express a preference or to provide other input regarding custody or visitation to the court, a minors counsel, an evaluator, an investigator, or a mediator who provides recommendations to the judge pursuant to Section 3183 shall indicate to the judge that the child wishes to address the court, or the judge may make that inquiry in the absence of that request. A party or a partys attorney may also indicate to the judge that the child wishes to address the court or judge.
(g)This section does not require the child to express to the court a preference or to provide other input regarding custody or visitation.
(h)The Judicial Council shall, no later than January 1, 2012, promulgate a rule of court establishing procedures for the examination of a child witness, and include guidelines on methods other than direct testimony for obtaining information or other input from the child regarding custody or visitation.
(i)The changes made to subdivisions (a) to (g), inclusive, by the act adding this subdivision shall become operative on January 1, 2012.
(j)(1)(A)The Judicial Council shall create a form to be filed with the court, attested to by a person specified in subdivision (f), certifying that a child who is 12 years of age or older, as required pursuant to subdivision (c), has been informed of their right to testify directly to the court or provide input pursuant to this section and that any input the child wishes to provide to the court has been obtained pursuant to this section and Rule 5.250 of the California Rules of Court.
(B)The Judicial Council shall develop a form necessary to effectuate subparagraph (A) on or before July 1, 2022.
(2)(A)Prior to any hearing on custody and visitation, all children 12 years of age or older whose parents or guardians have a case in family court shall be informed of their right to give input to the court.
(B)If the court determines that it is appropriate pursuant to the best interest of a child under 12 years of age to address the court regarding custody or visitation, the child shall be informed by the parties in age-appropriate language that they have a right to provide input and information regarding their preferences for custody or visitation, if the child wishes.
(3)If the child who wishes to give input does not wish to speak to the court directly, arrangements shall be made for alternate methods of providing input and information.
(4)If a child is interviewed by a child custody evaluator, investigator, mediator, or other court-connected professional, the child shall immediately be informed of the childs right to address the court by the child custody evaluator, investigator, mediator, or other court-connected professional.
(5)If the child wishes to be heard, the court shall schedule a hearing within a reasonable time after receipt of the notification or information that the child wishes to provide input.
(6)The court shall not make a final decision on custody or visitation without documentation in the record, as specified in paragraph (1), demonstrating that the child has been informed pursuant to this subdivision, any input the child wishes to give has been obtained in accordance with this section, and, if relevant, the hearing described in paragraph (5) has occurred.
(7)If the child wishes to have their testimony and preference remain private because of physical or sexual safety or concerns of retaliation, the court shall ensure the child is safe and is not retaliated against.
(A)If the child has disclosed to any governmental entity, including the court or a mandated reporter, that a parent or household member has physically or sexually abused, assaulted, or battered them or any family member, or there is corroborating evidence of abuse, the court shall give strong weight to the childs preference for custody or visitation when that preference provides safety for the child.
(B)If, in addressing the court in any form pursuant to Rule 5.250 of the California Rules of Court, a child alleges or reports in any manner that they have been assaulted, battered, or sexually abused by a party who has or is seeking custody, or that they fear they will be retaliated against for their statements to the court, the court shall take immediate action to ensure the childs safety, including issuing emergency orders if needed.
(C)A child 12 years of age or older who reports to the court that they have been battered, assaulted, or sexually abused by a person who has or is seeking unsupervised custody shall be informed of their right to request a restraining order and shall be provided information on how to access the restraining order process, including a referral to a domestic violence advocate for assistance in filing the restraining order.
(D)If a child reports to the court, in any manner, that they have been assaulted, battered, or sexually abused by a parent who has or is seeking unsupervised custody, the court shall state the reasons on the record why the court believes the child will be safe in the unsupervised custody, visitation, or contact with that parent, prior to ordering the child into unsupervised custody, visitation, or contact with that parent.
SEC. 2.If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2021 | Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 768, Statutes of 2021. |
| Oct 9, 2021 | Approved by the Governor. |
| Sep 9, 2021 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1 p.m. |
| Sep 3, 2021 | Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2378.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling. |
| Sep 2, 2021 | In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending. |
| Sep 2, 2021 | Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 2720.) Ordered to the Senate. |
| Aug 31, 2021 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Aug 30, 2021 | Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading. |
| Aug 26, 2021 | From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (August 26). |
| Aug 19, 2021 | August 19 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file. |
| Jun 22, 2021 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Jun 14, 2021 | From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD. |
| May 28, 2021 | Referred to Com. on JUD. |
| May 24, 2021 | In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk. |
| May 24, 2021 | Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 1229.) Ordered to the Assembly. |
| May 18, 2021 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| May 17, 2021 | Read third time and amended. |
| May 5, 2021 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| May 4, 2021 | From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8. |
| Apr 27, 2021 | From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Apr 21, 2021 | Set for hearing May 3. |
| Apr 14, 2021 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 776.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Apr 5, 2021 | From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD. |
| Mar 25, 2021 | Set for hearing April 13. |
| Mar 23, 2021 | April 6 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author. |
| Mar 23, 2021 | Set for hearing April 6. |
| Mar 3, 2021 | Referred to Com. on JUD. |
| Feb 22, 2021 | Art. IV. Sec. 8(a) of the Constitution dispensed with. |
| Feb 22, 2021 | From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 24. |
| Feb 19, 2021 | Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2021 | Unfinished Business SB654 Min et al. Concurrence | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Sep 2, 2021 | SB 654 Min Senate Third Reading By Blanca Rubio | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| May 24, 2021 | Senate 3rd Reading SB654 Min et al. | Senate Floor |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
Bill Author
