SB 1286: Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: covered debt: commercial debts.
- Session Year: 2023-2024
- House: Senate
- Latest Version Date: 2024-09-24
Current Status:
Passed
(2024-09-24: Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 522, Statutes of 2024.)
Introduced
In Committee
First Chamber
In Committee
Second Chamber
Enacted
What does this bill do?
This bill expands California's Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to cover certain commercial debts called "covered commercial debt"—commercial loans or credit of up to $500,000 that are owed by or guaranteed by individuals—when those debts are entered into, renewed, sold, or assigned on or after July 1, 2025. It applies the Act's bans on unfair, deceptive, or harassing collection tactics to those debts (including rules about where lawsuits can be filed, identity‑theft protections, and outlawing fake legal‑process notices), requires collectors and debt buyers to provide requested account records, and clarifies it does not create extra licensing requirements.
The summary is provided by generative AI which can make mistakes. For original language, please view the details in the table below.
Existing law, the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, prohibits debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of consumer debts and requires debtors to act fairly in entering into and honoring those debts. Existing law defines debt collection as any act or practice in connection with the collection of consumer debts. Existing law defines consumer debt for these purposes to mean money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing, or alleged to be due or owing, from a natural person by reason of a consumer credit transaction. Existing law also defines consumer debt to include a mortgage debt.
This bill would recast those provisions to expand the scope of those provisions to additionally prohibit debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of covered commercial debts, as defined, entered into, renewed, sold, or assigned on or after July 1, 2025, and to make conforming changes.
For all delinquent debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2022, existing law requires a debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned to provide the debtor, upon the debtors written request, a statement that includes specified information. For purposes of these provisions, existing law defines delinquent debt as a consumer debt, other than a mortgage debt, as specified.
This bill would revise the definition of delinquent debt to mean a covered debt, other than a mortgage debt, as specified, and would specify that these provisions apply to all delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
Existing law prohibits a debt collector from collecting or attempting to collect a consumer debt, other than one reduced to judgment, by means of judicial proceedings in a county other than the county in which the debtor has incurred the consumer debt or the county in which the debtor resides at the time those proceedings are instituted, or resided at the time the debt was incurred.
This bill would authorize a debt collector to collect or attempt to collect covered commercial debt by means of a judicial proceeding in the county in which the nonnatural person for whose purpose the commercial debt was incurred is located, as specified. The bill would also specify that the provisions related to judicial proceedings apply to all delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
Existing law makes it a crime, with respect to attempted collection of a consumer debt, for a debt collector, creditor, or an attorney to send a communication that simulates legal or judicial process or that gives the appearance of being authorized, issued, or approved by a governmental agency or attorney if it is not.
This bill would expand that provision to make it a crime to engage in those acts with respect to the collection of a covered debt. By expanding the scope of this crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing law requires a debt collector to stop collecting a consumer debt when an alleged debtor provides the debt collector with certain information, including information relating to the debtors status as an alleged victim of identity theft. This information may also include a specified written statement that certifies that the representations are true, correct, and contain no material omissions of fact. A person submitting the certification who declares as true a material matter that the person knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor.
This bill would expand those provisions to also apply in the case of collection of a covered debt. By expanding the scope of this crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing law, the Debt Collection Licensing Act, prohibits a person from engaging in the business of debt collection, as defined, in California without first obtaining a license, as specified. Existing law provides various exceptions to this licensing requirement.
This bill would specify, with respect to the collection of covered commercial debt or covered commercial credit, that the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act does not intend to create or impose any additional licensing requirement on a debt collector.
This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1788.14 of the Civil Code proposed by SB 1061 to be operative only if this bill and SB 1061 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law, the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, prohibits debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of consumer debts and requires debtors to act fairly in entering into and honoring those debts. Existing law defines debt collection as any act or practice in connection with the collection of consumer debts. Existing law defines consumer debt for these purposes to mean money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing, or alleged to be due or owing, from a natural person by reason of a consumer credit transaction. Existing law also defines consumer debt to include a mortgage debt.
This bill would recast those provisions to expand the scope of those provisions to additionally prohibit debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of covered commercial debts, as defined, entered into, renewed, sold, or assigned on or after July 1, 2025, and to make conforming changes.
For all delinquent debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2022, existing law requires a debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned to provide the debtor, upon the debtors written request, a statement that includes specified information. For purposes of these provisions, existing law defines delinquent debt as a consumer debt, other than a mortgage debt, as specified.
This bill would revise the definition of delinquent debt to mean a covered debt, other than a mortgage debt, as specified, and would specify that these provisions apply to all delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
Existing law prohibits a debt collector from collecting or attempting to collect a consumer debt, other than one reduced to judgment, by means of judicial proceedings in a county other than the county in which the debtor has incurred the consumer debt or the county in which the debtor resides at the time those proceedings are instituted, or resided at the time the debt was incurred.
This bill would authorize a debt collector to collect or attempt to collect covered commercial debt by means of a judicial proceeding in the county in which the nonnatural person for whose purpose the commercial debt was incurred is located, as specified. The bill would also specify that the provisions related to judicial proceedings apply to all delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
Existing law makes it a crime, with respect to attempted collection of a consumer debt, for a debt collector, creditor, or an attorney to send a communication that simulates legal or judicial process or that gives the appearance of being authorized, issued, or approved by a governmental agency or attorney if it is not.
This bill would expand that provision to make it a crime to engage in those acts with respect to the collection of a covered debt. By expanding the scope of this crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing law requires a debt collector to stop collecting a consumer debt when an alleged debtor provides the debt collector with certain information, including information relating to the debtors status as an alleged victim of identity theft. This information may also include a specified written statement that certifies that the representations are true, correct, and contain no material omissions of fact. A person submitting the certification who declares as true a material matter that the person knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor.
This bill would expand those provisions to also apply in the case of collection of a covered debt. By expanding the scope of this crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing law, the Debt Collection Licensing Act, prohibits a person from engaging in the business of debt collection, as defined, in California without first obtaining a license, as specified. Existing law provides various exceptions to this licensing requirement.
This bill would specify, with respect to the collection of covered commercial debt or covered commercial credit, that the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act does not intend to create or impose any additional licensing requirement on a debt collector.
This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1788.14 of the Civil Code proposed by SB 1061 to be operative only if this bill and SB 1061 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law, the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, prohibits debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of consumer debts and requires debtors to act fairly in entering into and honoring those debts. Existing law defines debt collection as any act or practice in connection with the collection of consumer debts. Existing law defines consumer debt for these purposes to mean money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing, or alleged to be due or owing, from a natural person by reason of a consumer credit transaction. Existing law also defines consumer debt to include a mortgage debt.
This bill would recast those provisions to expand the scope of those provisions to additionally prohibit debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of covered commercial debts, as defined, entered into, renewed, sold, or assigned on or after July 1, 2025, and to make conforming changes.
For all delinquent debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2022, existing law requires a debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned to provide the debtor, upon the debtors written request, a statement that includes specified information. For purposes of these provisions, existing law defines delinquent debt as a consumer debt, other than a mortgage debt, as specified.
This bill would revise the definition of delinquent debt to mean a covered debt, other than a mortgage debt, as specified, and would specify that these provisions apply to all delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
Existing law prohibits a debt collector from collecting or attempting to collect a consumer debt, other than one reduced to judgment, by means of judicial proceedings in a county other than the county in which the debtor has incurred the consumer debt or the county in which the debtor resides at the time those proceedings are instituted, or resided at the time the debt was incurred.
This bill would authorize a debt collector to collect or attempt to collect covered commercial debt by means of a judicial proceeding in the county in which the non-natural nonnatural person for whose purpose the commercial debt was incurred is located, as specified. The bill would also specify that the provisions related to judicial proceedings apply to all delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
Existing law makes it a crime, with respect to attempted collection of a consumer debt, for a debt collector, creditor, or an attorney to send a communication that simulates legal or judicial process or that gives the appearance of being authorized, issued, or approved by a governmental agency or attorney if it is not.
This bill would expand that provision to make it a crime to engage in those acts with respect to the collection of a covered debt. By expanding the scope of this crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing law requires a debt collector to stop collecting a consumer debt when an alleged debtor provides the debt collector with certain information, including information relating to the debtors status as an alleged victim of identity theft. This information may also include a specified written statement that certifies that the representations are true, correct, and contain no material omissions of fact. A person submitting the certification who declares as true a material matter that the person knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor.
This bill would expand those provisions to also apply in the case of collection of a covered debt. By expanding the scope of this crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.Existing law, the Debt Collection Licensing Act, prohibits a person from engaging in the business of debt collection, as defined, in California without first obtaining a license, as specified. Existing law provides various exceptions to this licensing requirement.
This bill would specify, with respect to the collection of covered commercial debt or covered commercial credit, that the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act does not intend to create or impose any additional licensing requirement on a debt collector.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1788.14 of the Civil Code proposed by SB 1061 to be operative only if this bill and SB 1061 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law, the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, prohibits debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of consumer debts and requires debtors to act fairly in entering into and honoring those debts. Existing law defines debt collection as any act or practice in connection with the collection of consumer debts. Existing law defines consumer debt for these purposes to mean money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing, or alleged to be due or owing, from a natural person by reason of a consumer credit transaction. Existing law also defines consumer debt to include a mortgage debt.
This bill would recast those provisions to expand the scope of those provisions to additionally prohibit debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of covered commercial debts, as defined, and to make conforming changes.
For all delinquent debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2022, existing law requires a debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned to provide the debtor, upon the debtors written request, a statement that includes specified information. For purposes of these provisions, existing law defines delinquent debt as a consumer debt, other than a mortgage debt, as specified.
This bill would revise the definition of delinquent debt to mean a covered debt, other than a mortgage debt, as specified, and would specify that these provisions apply to all delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
Existing law prohibits a debt collector from collecting or attempting to collect a consumer debt, other than one reduced to judgment, by means of judicial proceedings in a county other than the county in which the debtor has incurred the consumer debt or the county in which the debtor resides at the time those proceedings are instituted, or resided at the time the debt was incurred.
This bill would authorize a debt collector to collect or attempt to collect covered commercial debt by means of a judicial proceeding in the county in which the non-natural person for whose purpose the commercial debt was incurred is located, as specified. The bill would also specify that the provisions related to judicial proceedings apply to all delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
Existing law makes it a crime, with respect to attempted collection of a consumer debt, for a debt collector, creditor, or an attorney to send a communication that simulates legal or judicial process or that gives the appearance of being authorized, issued, or approved by a governmental agency or attorney if it is not.
This bill would expand that provision to make it a crime to engage in those acts with respect to the collection of a covered debt. By expanding the scope of this crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing law requires a debt collector to stop collecting a consumer debt when an alleged debtor provides the debt collector with certain information, including information relating to the debtors status as an alleged victim of identity theft. This information may also include a specified written statement that certifies that the representations are true, correct, and contain no material omissions of fact. A person submitting the certification who declares as true a material matter that the person knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor.
This bill would expand those provisions to also apply in the case of collection of a covered debt. By expanding the scope of this crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
Existing law, the Debt Collection Licensing Act, prohibits a person from engaging in the business of debt collection, as defined, in California without first obtaining a license, as specified. Existing law provides various exceptions to this licensing requirement.
This bill would specify, with respect to the collection of covered commercial debt or covered commercial credit, that the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act does not intend to create or impose any additional licensing requirement on a debt collector.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law, the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, prohibits debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of consumer debts and requires debtors to act fairly in entering into and honoring those debts. Existing law defines debt collection as any act or practice in connection with the collection of consumer debts. Existing law defines consumer debt for these purposes to mean money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing, or alleged to be due or owing, from a natural person by reason of a consumer credit transaction. Existing law also defines consumer debt to include a mortgage debt.
This bill would recast those provisions to expand the scope of those provisions to additionally prohibit debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of small business covered commercial debts, as defined, and to make conforming changes.
For all delinquent debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2022, existing law requires a debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned to provide the debtor, upon the debtors written request, a statement that includes specified information. For purposes of these provisions, existing law defines delinquent debt as a consumer debt, other than a mortgage debt, as specified.
This bill would revise the definition of delinquent debt to mean a covered debt, other than a mortgage debt, as specified, and would specify that these provisions apply to all delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
Existing law makes it a crime, with respect to attempted collection of a consumer debt, for a debt collector, creditor, or an attorney to send a communication that simulates legal or judicial process or that gives the appearance of being authorized, issued, or approved by a governmental agency or attorney if it is not.
This bill would expand that provision to make it a crime to engage in those acts with respect to the collection of a covered debt. By expanding the scope of this crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing law requires a debt collector to stop collecting a consumer debt when an alleged debtor provides the debt collector with certain information, including information relating to the debtors status as an alleged victim of identity theft. This information may also include a specified written statement that certifies that the representations are true, correct, and contain no material omissions of fact. A person submitting the certification who declares as true a material matter that the person knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor.
This bill would expand those provisions to also apply in the case of collection of a covered debt. By expanding the scope of this crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law, the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, prohibits debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of consumer debts and requires debtors to act fairly in entering into and honoring those debts. Existing law defines debt collection as any act or practice in connection with the collection of consumer debts. Existing law defines consumer debt for these purposes to mean money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing, or alleged to be due or owing, from a natural person by reason of a consumer credit transaction. Existing law also defines consumer debt to include a mortgage debt.
This bill would recast those provisions to expand the scope of those provisions to additionally prohibit debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of small business debts, as defined, and to make conforming changes.
Existing law makes it a crime, with respect to attempted collection of a consumer debt, for a debt collector, creditor, or an attorney to send a communication that simulates legal or judicial process or that gives the appearance of being authorized, issued, or approved by a governmental agency or attorney if it is not.
This bill would expand that provision to make it a crime to engage in those acts with respect to the collection of a covered debt. By expanding the scope of this crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing law requires a debt collector to stop collecting a consumer debt when an alleged debtor provides the debt collector with certain information, including information relating to the debtors status as an alleged victim of identity theft. This information may also include a specified written statement that certifies that the representations are true, correct, and contain no material omissions of fact. A person submitting the certification who declares as true a material matter that the person knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor.
This bill would expand those provisions to also apply in the case of collection of a covered debt. By expanding the scope of this crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law prohibits a covered entity, as defined, from charging certain fees in connection with a commercial financing transaction, as defined, with a small business or small business owner, including a fee for monitoring the small businesss collateral unless the underlying commercial financing transaction is delinquent for more than 60 days.This bill would make a nonsubstantive change to that provision.Existing law prohibits a covered entity, as defined, from charging certain fees in connection with a commercial financing transaction, as defined, with a small business or small business owner, including a fee for monitoring the small businesss collateral unless the underlying commercial financing transaction is delinquent for more than 60 days.
This bill would make a nonsubstantive change to that provision.
(a)The Legislature makes the following findings:
(1)The banking and credit system and grantors of credit to consumers are dependent upon the collection of just and owing debts. Unfair or deceptive collection practices undermine the public confidence, which is essential to the continued functioning of the banking and credit system and sound extensions of credit to consumers and small businesses.
(2)There is need to ensure that debt collectors and debtors exercise their responsibilities to one another with fairness, honesty and due regard for the rights of the other.
(b)It is the purpose of this title to prohibit debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of consumer debts and small business debts and to require debtors to act fairly in entering into and honoring those debts, as specified in this title.
(c)Nothing in this title is intended to create or impose an additional licensing requirement under Division 25 (commencing with Section 100000) of the Financial Code on a debt collector with respect to the collection of covered commercial debt or covered commercial credit.
(d)The provisions of this title related to covered commercial credit or covered commercial debt apply to covered commercial credit or covered commercial debt entered into, renewed, sold, or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
SEC. 2.Section 1788.2 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.2.(a)Definitions and rules of construction set forth in this section are applicable for the purpose of this title.
(b)The term debt collection means any act or practice in connection with the collection of covered debts.
(c)The term debt collector means any person who, in the ordinary course of business, regularly, on behalf of that person or others, engages in debt collection. The term includes any person who composes and sells, or offers to compose and sell, forms, letters, and other collection media used or intended to be used for debt collection.
(d)The term debt means money, property, or their equivalent that is due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person to another person.
(e)The term consumer credit transaction means a transaction between a natural person and another person in which property, services, or money is acquired on credit by that natural person from the other person primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
(f)The terms consumer debt and consumer credit mean money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person by reason of a consumer credit transaction. The term consumer debt includes a mortgage debt.
(g)The term person means a natural person, partnership, corporation, limited liability company, trust, estate, cooperative, association, or other similar entity.
(h)(1) Except as provided in Section 1788.18, the term debtor means a natural person from whom a debt collector seeks to collect a covered debt that is due and owing or alleged to be due and owing from that person.
(2)In relation to a covered commercial debt or covered commercial credit, a debtor shall mean a natural person who guarantees an obligation related to a covered commercial credit transaction.
(i)The term creditor means a person who extends covered credit to a debtor.
(j)The term consumer credit report means any written, oral, or other communication of any information by a consumer reporting agency bearing on a consumers creditworthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living that is used or expected to be used or collected in whole or in part for the purpose of serving as a factor in establishing the consumers eligibility for (1) credit or insurance to be used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, or (2) employment purposes, or (3) other purposes authorized under any applicable federal or state law or regulation. The term does not include (a) any report containing information solely as to transactions or experiences between the consumer and the person making the report; (b) any authorization or approval of a specific extension of credit directly or indirectly by the issuer of a credit card or similar device; or (c) any report in which a person who has been requested by a third party to make a specific extension of credit directly or indirectly to a consumer conveys that persons decision with respect to that request, if the third party advises the consumer of the name and address of the person to whom the request was made, and the person makes the disclosures to the consumer required under any applicable federal or state law or regulation.
(k)The term consumer reporting agency means any person that, for monetary fees, dues, or on a cooperative nonprofit basis, regularly engages, in whole or in part, in the practice of assembling or evaluating consumer credit information or other information on consumers for the purpose of furnishing consumer credit reports to third parties and uses any means or facility for the purpose of preparing or furnishing consumer credit reports.
(l)The term covered debt means a consumer debt or a covered commercial debt.
(m)The term covered credit means consumer credit or covered commercial credit.
(n)The terms covered commercial debt and covered commercial credit mean money due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person to a lender, a commercial financing provider, as defined in Section 22800 of the Financial Code, or a debt buyer, as defined in Section 1788.50, by reason of one or more covered commercial credit transactions, provided the total amount of all covered commercial credit transactions and all other noncovered commercial credit transactions due and owing by the debtor or other person obligated under the transactions to the same lender, commercial financing provider, or debt buyer is no more than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000).
(1)For credit owed to a lender or commercial financing provider, the total value of credit per transaction is determined as of when the transaction is first entered into and is the maximum amount that the creditor is contractually required to provide or make available to the debtor over the life of the transaction or is the maximum amount that is enumerated in an open-end credit agreement.
(2)The value of credit for each transaction for a debt buyer is the amount owing or alleged to be owing to the debt buyer when the debt buyer acquires the rights of the lender or commercial financing provider in the commercial credit.
(o)The term covered commercial credit transaction means a transaction between a person and another person in which a total value of no more than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000), is acquired on credit by that person from the other person for use primarily for other than personal, family, or household purposes.
SEC. 3.Section 1788.10 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.10.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following conduct:
(a)The use, or threat of use, of physical force or violence or any criminal means to cause harm to the person, or the reputation, or the property of any person.
(b)The threat that the failure to pay a covered debt will result in an accusation that the debtor has committed a crime where the accusation, if made, would be false.
(c)The communication of, or threat to communicate to any person the fact that a debtor has engaged in conduct, other than the failure to pay a covered debt, which the debt collector knows or has reason to believe will defame the debtor.
(d)The threat to the debtor to sell or assign to another person the obligation of the debtor to pay a covered debt, with an accompanying false representation that the result of the sale or assignment would be that the debtor would lose any defense to the covered debt.
(e)The threat to any person that nonpayment of the covered debt may result in the arrest of the debtor or the seizure, garnishment, attachment, or sale of any property or the garnishment or attachment of wages of the debtor, unless the action is in fact contemplated by the debt collector and permitted by the law.
(f)The threat to take any action against the debtor, which is prohibited by this title.
SEC. 4.Section 1788.11 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.11.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Using obscene or profane language.
(b)Placing a telephone call without disclosing the callers identity, provided that an employee of a licensed collection agency may identify oneself by using their registered alias name if they correctly identify the agency that they represent. A debt collector shall provide its California debt collector license number, if applicable, upon the consumers request.
(c)Causing expense to any person for long distance telephone calls, telegram fees, or charges for other similar communications, by misrepresenting to the person the purpose of the telephone call, telegram or similar communication.
(d)Causing a telephone to ring repeatedly or continuously to annoy the person called.
(e)Communicating, by telephone or in person, with the debtor with such frequency as to be unreasonable, and to constitute harassment of the debtor under the circumstances.
(f)Sending written or digital communication to the person that does not display the California license number of the collector, if applicable, in at least 12-point type.
SEC. 5.Section 1788.12 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.12.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt or consumer debt, as specified, by means of the following practices:
(a)Communicating with the debtors employer regarding the debtors consumer debt unless such a communication is necessary to the collection of the consumer debt, or unless the debtor or their attorney has consented in writing to that communication. A communication is necessary to the collection of the consumer debt only if it is made for the purposes of verifying the debtors employment, locating the debtor, or effecting garnishment, after judgment, of the debtors wages, or in the case of a medical debt for the purpose of discovering the existence of medical insurance. Any such communication, other than a communication in the case of a medical debt by a health care provider or its agent for the purpose of discovering the existence of medical insurance, shall be in writing unless that written communication receives no response within 15 days and shall be made only as many times as is necessary to the collection of the consumer debt. Communications to a debtors employer regarding a consumer debt shall not contain language that would be improper if the communication were made to the debtor. One communication solely for the purpose of verifying the debtors employment may be oral without prior written contact.
(b)Communicating information regarding a consumer debt to any member of the debtors family, other than the debtors spouse or the parents or guardians of the debtor who is either a minor or who resides in the same household with that parent or guardian, prior to obtaining a judgment against the debtor, except where the purpose of the communication is to locate the debtor, or where the debtor or their attorney has consented in writing to that communication.
(c)Communicating to any person any list of debtors that discloses the nature or existence of a covered debt, commonly known as deadbeat lists, or advertising any covered debt for sale, by naming the debtor.
(d)Communicating with the debtor by means of a written communication that displays or conveys any information about the covered debt or the debtor other than the name, address, and telephone number of the debtor and the debt collector and that is intended both to be seen by any other person and also to embarrass the debtor.
(e)Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this section, the disclosure, publication, or communication by a debt collector of information relating to a covered debt or the debtor to a consumer reporting agency or to any other person reasonably believed to have a legitimate business need for that information shall not be deemed to violate this title.
SEC. 6.Section 1788.13 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.13.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Any communication with the debtor other than in the name either of the debt collector or the person on whose behalf the debt collector is acting.
(b)Any false representation that any person is an attorney or counselor at law.
(c)Any communication with a debtor in the name of an attorney or counselor at law or upon stationery or like written instruments bearing the name of the attorney or counselor at law, unless that communication is by an attorney or counselor at law or shall have been approved or authorized by that attorney or counselor at law.
(d)The representation that any debt collector is vouched for, bonded by, affiliated with, or is an instrumentality, agent or official of any federal, state or local government or any agency of federal, state or local government, unless the collector is actually employed by the particular governmental agency in question and is acting on behalf of that agency in the debt collection matter.
(e)The false representation that the covered debt may be increased by the addition of attorneys fees, investigation fees, service fees, finance charges, or other charges if, in fact, those fees or charges may not legally be added to the existing obligation.
(f)The false representation that information concerning a debtors failure or alleged failure to pay a covered debt has been or is about to be referred to a consumer reporting agency.
(g)The false representation that a debt collector is a consumer reporting agency.
(h)The false representation that collection letters, notices or other printed forms are being sent by or on behalf of a claim, credit, audit, or legal department.
(i)The false representation of the true nature of the business or services being rendered by the debt collector.
(j)The false representation that a legal proceeding has been, is about to be, or will be instituted unless payment of a covered debt is made.
(k)The false representation that a covered debt has been, is about to be, or will be sold, assigned, or referred to a debt collector for collection.
(l)Any communication by a collection agency to a debtor demanding money unless the claim is actually assigned to the collection agency.
SEC. 7.Section 1788.14 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.14.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Obtaining an affirmation from a debtor of a covered debt that has been discharged in bankruptcy, without clearly and conspicuously disclosing to the debtor, in writing, at the time the affirmation is sought, the fact that the debtor is not legally obligated to make an affirmation.
(b)Collecting or attempting to collect from the debtor the whole or any part of the debt collectors fee or charge for services rendered, or other expense incurred by the debt collector in the collection of the covered debt, except as permitted by law.
(c)Initiating communications, other than statements of account, with the debtor with regard to the covered debt, when the debt collector has been previously notified in writing by the debtors attorney that the debtor is represented by the attorney with respect to the covered debt and the notice includes the attorneys name and address and a request by the attorney that all communications regarding the covered debt be addressed to the attorney, unless the attorney fails to answer correspondence, return telephone calls, or discuss the obligation in question. This subdivision shall not apply if prior approval has been obtained from the debtors attorney, or if the communication is a response in the ordinary course of business to a debtors inquiry.
(d)Sending a written communication to a debtor in an attempt to collect a time-barred debt without providing the debtor with one of the following written notices:
(1)If the debt is not past the date for obsolescence set forth in Section 605(a) of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681c), the following notice shall be included in the first written communication provided to the debtor after the debt has become time-barred:
The law limits how long you can be sued on a debt. Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it. If you do not pay the debt, [insert name of debt collector] may [continue to] report it to the credit reporting agencies as unpaid for as long as the law permits this reporting.
(2)If the debt is past the date for obsolescence set forth in Section 605(a) of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681c), the following notice shall be included in the first written communication provided to the debtor after the date for obsolescence:
The law limits how long you can be sued on a debt. Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it, and we will not report it to any credit reporting agency.
(e)Collecting consumer debt that originated with a hospital licensed pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code without including in the first written communication to the debtor a copy of the notice required pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 127425 of the Health and Safety Code and a statement that the debt collector will wait at least 180 days from the date the debtor was initially billed for the hospital services that are the basis of the debt before reporting adverse information to a credit reporting agency or filing a lawsuit against the debtor.
(f)For purposes of this section, first written communication means the first communication sent to the debtor in writing or by facsimile, email, or other similar means.
SEC. 7.5.Section 1788.14 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.14.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Obtaining an affirmation from a debtor of a covered debt that has been discharged in bankruptcy, without clearly and conspicuously disclosing to the debtor, in writing, at the time the affirmation is sought, the fact that the debtor is not legally obligated to make an affirmation.
(b)Collecting or attempting to collect from the debtor the whole or any part of the debt collectors fee or charge for services rendered, or other expense incurred by the debt collector in the collection of the covered debt, except as permitted by law.
(c)Initiating communications, other than statements of account, with the debtor with regard to the covered debt, when the debt collector has been previously notified in writing by the debtors attorney that the debtor is represented by the attorney with respect to the covered debt and the notice includes the attorneys name and address and a request by the attorney that all communications regarding the covered debt be addressed to the attorney, unless the attorney fails to answer correspondence, return telephone calls, or discuss the obligation in question. This subdivision shall not apply if prior approval has been obtained from the debtors attorney, or if the communication is a response in the ordinary course of business to a debtors inquiry.
(d)Sending a written communication to a debtor in an attempt to collect a time-barred debt without providing the debtor with one of the following written notices:
(1)If the debt is not past the date for obsolescence set forth in Section 605(a) of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681c), the following notice shall be included in the first written communication provided to the debtor after the debt has become time-barred:
The law limits how long you can be sued on a debt. Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it. If you do not pay the debt, [insert name of debt collector] may [continue to] report it to the credit reporting agencies as unpaid for as long as the law permits this reporting.
(2)If the debt is past the date for obsolescence set forth in Section 605(a) of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681c), the following notice shall be included in the first written communication provided to the debtor after the date for obsolescence:
The law limits how long you can be sued on a debt. Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it, and we will not report it to any credit reporting agency.
(e)Collecting consumer debt that originated with a hospital licensed pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code without including in the first written communication to the debtor a copy of the notice required pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 127425 of the Health and Safety Code and a statement that the debt collector will wait at least 180 days from the date the debtor was initially billed for the hospital services that are the basis of the debt before filing a lawsuit against the debtor.
(f)For purposes of this section, first written communication means the first communication sent to the debtor in writing or by facsimile, email, or other similar means.
SEC. 8.Section 1788.14.5 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.14.5.(a)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall provide to the debtor, upon the debtors written request, a statement that includes all of the following information pursuant to subdivision (c):
(1)That the debt collector has authority to assert the rights of the creditor to collect the debt.
(2)(A)The debt balance and an explanation of the amount, nature, and reason for all interest and fees, if any, imposed by the creditor or any subsequent entities to which the debt was assigned.
(B)The explanation required by subparagraph (A) shall identify separately the balance, the total of any interest, and the total of any fees.
(3)The date the debt became delinquent or the date of the last payment.
(4)The name and an address of the creditor and the creditors account number associated with the debt. The creditors name and address shall be in sufficient form so as to reasonably identify the creditor.
(5)The name and last known address of the debtor as they appeared in the creditors records before the assignment of the debt to the debt collector.
(6)The names and addresses of all persons or entities other than the debt collector to which the debt was assigned. The names and addresses shall be in sufficient form so as to reasonably identify each assignee.
(7)The California license number of the debt collector, if applicable.
(b)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall not make a written statement to a debtor in an attempt to collect a delinquent debt unless the debt collector has access to a copy of a contract or other document evidencing the debtors agreement to the debt, except in the following circumstances:
(1)If the claim is based on debt for which no signed contract or agreement exists, the debt collector shall have access to a copy of a document provided to the debtor while the account was active, demonstrating that the debt was incurred by the debtor.
(2)For a revolving credit account, the most recent monthly statement recording a purchase transaction, last payment, or balance transfer shall be deemed sufficient to satisfy the requirements of this subparagraph.
(c)(1)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall provide the information or documents identified in subdivisions (a) and (b) to the debtor without charge within 30 calendar days of receipt of a debtors written request for information regarding the debt or proof of the debt.
(2)If the debt collector cannot provide the information or documents within 30 calendar days, the debt collector shall cease all collection of the debt until the debt collector provides the debtor the information or documents described in subdivisions (a) and (b).
(d)(1)A debt collector shall provide a debtor with whom it has contact an active postal address to which a debtor may send a request for the information described in this section.
(2)A debt collector may also provide an active email address to which these requests can be sent and through which information and documents can be delivered if the parties agree.
(e)(1)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall include in its first written communication with the debtor in no smaller than 12-point type, a separate prominent notice that contains the following statement:
You may request records showing the following: (1) that [insert name of debt collector] has the right to seek collection of the debt; (2) the debt balance, including an explanation of any interest charges and additional fees; (3) the date the debt became delinquent or the date of the last payment; (4) the name of the creditor and the account number associated with the debt; (5) the name and last known address of the debtor as it appeared in the creditors records prior to assignment of the debt; and (6) the names of all persons or entities other than the debt collector to which the debt has been assigned, if applicable. You may also request from us a copy of the contract or other document evidencing your agreement to the debt.
A request for these records may be addressed to: [insert debt collectors active mailing address and email address, if applicable].
(2)If a language other than English is principally used by the debt collector in the initial oral contact with the debtor, the notice required by this subdivision shall be provided to the debtor in that language within five business days.
(f)(1)A debt buyer that complies with the requirements of Section 1788.52 shall be deemed to be in compliance with this section.
(2)For purposes of this subdivision, debt buyer shall have the same meaning as in Section 1788.50.
(g)For the purposes of this section, the term delinquent debt means a covered debt, other than a mortgage debt, that is past due at least 90 days and has not been charged off.
(h)This section shall apply to all delinquent consumer debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2022.
(i)This section shall apply to all delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
SEC. 9.Section 1788.15 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.15.(a)No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of judicial proceedings when the debt collector knows that service of process, where essential to jurisdiction over the debtor or their property, has not been legally effected.
(b)No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt, other than one reduced to judgment, by means of judicial proceedings in a county other than the county in which the debtor has incurred the covered debt or the county in which the debtor resides at the time those proceedings are instituted, or resided at the time the debt was incurred.
(c)Notwithstanding subdivision (b), when the obligation of the debtor arises from a guaranty by the debtor of a covered commercial debt, a debt collector may collect or attempt to collect covered commercial debt by means of a judicial proceeding in the county in which the nonnatural person for whose purpose the commercial debt was incurred is located.
(d)This section shall apply to all delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
SEC. 10.Section 1788.16 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.16.It is unlawful, with respect to attempted collection of a covered debt, for a debt collector, creditor, or an attorney to send a communication that simulates legal or judicial process or that gives the appearance of being authorized, issued, or approved by a governmental agency or attorney when it is not. Any violation of the provisions of this section is a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) or by both.
SEC. 11.Section 1788.17 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.17.Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, every debt collector collecting or attempting to collect a consumer debt shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1692b to 1692j, inclusive, of, and shall be subject to the remedies in Section 1692k of, Title 15 of the United States Code. However, subsection (11) of Section 1692e and Section 1692g shall not apply to any person specified in paragraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (6) of Section 1692a of Title 15 of the United States Code or that persons principal. The references to federal codes in this section refer to those codes as they read January 1, 2001.
SEC. 12.Section 1788.18 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.18.(a)Upon receipt from a debtor of all of the following, a debt collector shall cease collection activities until completion of the review provided in subdivision (d):
(1)A copy of a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) identity theft report, completed and signed by the debtor. The debtor may choose, instead, to send a copy of a police report filed by the debtor alleging that the debtor is the victim of an identity theft crime, including, but not limited to, a violation of Section 530.5 of the Penal Code, for the specific debt being collected by the debt collector; however, the debt collector shall not also require a police report if the debtor submits an FTC identity theft report.
(2)The debtors written statement that the debtor claims to be the victim of identity theft with respect to the specific debt being collected by the debt collector.
(b)The written statement described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) shall consist of either of the following:
(1)A written statement that contains the content of the Identity Theft Victims Fraudulent Account Information Request offered to the public by the California Office of Privacy Protection.
(2)A written statement that certifies that the representations are true, correct, and contain no material omissions of fact to the best knowledge and belief of the person submitting the certification. A person submitting the certification who declares as true any material matter pursuant to this subdivision that they know to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor. The statement shall contain or be accompanied by the following, to the extent that an item listed below is relevant to the debtors allegation of identity theft with respect to the debt in question:
(A)A statement that the debtor is a victim of identity theft.
(B)A copy of the debtors drivers license or identification card, as issued by the state.
(C)Any other identification document that supports the statement of identity theft.
(D)Specific facts supporting the claim of identity theft, if available.
(E)Any explanation showing that the debtor did not incur the debt.
(F)Any available correspondence disputing the debt after transaction information has been provided to the debtor.
(G)Documentation of the residence of the debtor at the time of the alleged debt. This may include copies of bills and statements, such as utility bills, tax statements, or other statements from businesses sent to the debtor, showing that the debtor lived at another residence at the time the debt was incurred.
(H)A telephone number for contacting the debtor concerning any additional information or questions, or direction that further communications to the debtor be in writing only, with the mailing address specified in the statement.
(I)To the extent the debtor has information concerning who may have incurred the debt, the identification of any person whom the debtor believes is responsible.
(J)An express statement that the debtor did not authorize the use of the debtors name or personal information for incurring the debt.
(K)The certification required pursuant to this paragraph shall be sufficient if it is in substantially the following form:
I certify the representations made are true, correct, and | |
(Date and Place)(Signature) |
(c)If a debtor notifies a debt collector orally that they are a victim of identity theft, the debt collector shall notify the debtor, orally or in writing, that the debtors claim must be in writing. If a debtor notifies a debt collector in writing that they are a victim of identity theft, but omits information required pursuant to subdivision (a) or, if applicable, the certification required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), if the debt collector does not cease collection activities, the debt collector shall provide written notice to the debtor of the additional information that is required, or the certification required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), as applicable, or send the debtor a copy of the Federal Trade Commissions identity theft form.
(d)Within 10 business days of receiving the complete statement and information described in subdivision (a), the debt collector shall, if it furnished adverse information about the debtor to a consumer credit reporting agency, notify the consumer credit reporting agency that the account is disputed, and initiate a review considering all of the information provided by the debtor and other information available to the debt collector in its file or from the creditor. The debt collector shall send notice of its determination to the debtor no later than 10 business days after concluding the review. The debt collector may recommence debt collection activities only upon making a good faith determination that the information does not establish that the debtor is not responsible for the specific debt in question. The debt collectors determination shall be made in a manner consistent with the provisions of subsection (1) of Section 1692f of Title 15 of the United States Code, as incorporated by Section 1788.17 of this code. The debt collector shall notify the debtor in writing of that determination and the basis for that determination before proceeding with any further collection activities. The debt collectors determination shall be based on all of the information provided by the debtor and other information available to the debt collector in its file or from the creditor.
(e)No inference or presumption that the debt is valid or invalid, or that the debtor is liable or not liable for the debt, shall arise if the debt collector decides after the review described in subdivision (d) to cease or recommence the debt collection activities. The exercise or nonexercise of rights under this section is not a waiver of any other right or defense of the debtor or debt collector.
(f)The statement and supporting documents that comply with subdivision (a) may also satisfy, to the extent those documents meet the requirements of, the notice requirement of paragraph (5) of subdivision (c) of Section 1798.93.
(g)A debt collector who ceases collection activities under this section and does not recommence those collection activities shall do both of the following:
(1)If the debt collector has furnished adverse information to a consumer credit reporting agency, notify the agency to delete that information no later than 10 business days after making its determination.
(2)Notify the creditor no later than 10 business days after making its determination that debt collection activities have been terminated based upon the debtors claim of identity theft.
(h)A debt collector who has possession of documents that the debtor is entitled to request from a creditor pursuant to Section 530.8 of the Penal Code is authorized to provide those documents to the debtor.
(i)Notwithstanding subdivision (h) of Section 1788.2, for the purposes of this section, debtor means a natural person, firm, association, organization, partnership, business trust, company, corporation, or limited liability company from which a debt collector seeks to collect a debt that is due and owing or alleged to be due and owing from the person or entity. The remedies provided by this title shall apply equally to violations of this section.
SEC. 13.Section 1788.20 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.20.In connection with any request or application for covered credit, no person shall:
(a)Request or apply for that credit at a time when that person knows there is no reasonable probability of that persons being able, or that person then lacks the intention, to pay the obligation created thereby in accordance with the terms and conditions of the credit extension.
(b)Knowingly submit false or inaccurate information or willfully conceal adverse information bearing upon that persons credit worthiness, credit standing, or credit capacity.
SEC. 14.Section 1788.21 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.21.(a)In connection with any covered credit existing or requested to be extended to a person, that person shall within a reasonable time notify the creditor or prospective creditor of any change in that persons name, address, or employment.
(b)Each responsibility set forth in subdivision (a) shall apply only if and after the creditor clearly and conspicuously in writing discloses that responsibility to that person.
SEC. 15.Section 1788.22 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.22.(a)In connection with any covered credit extended to a person under an account:
(1)No such person shall attempt to consummate any covered credit transaction thereunder knowing that credit privileges under the account have been terminated or suspended.
(2)Each such person shall notify the creditor by telephone, telegraph, letter, or any other reasonable means that an unauthorized use of the account has occurred or may occur as the result of loss or theft of a credit card, or other instrument identifying the account, within a reasonable time after that persons discovery thereof, and shall reasonably assist the creditor in determining the facts and circumstances relating to any unauthorized use of the account.
(b)Each responsibility set forth in subdivision (a) shall apply only if and after the creditor clearly and conspicuously in writing discloses that responsibility to that person.
SEC. 16.Section 100001 of the Financial Code is amended to read:100001.(a)No person shall engage in the business of debt collection in this state without first obtaining a license pursuant to this division. To the extent permitted by federal law, a person is acting in this state if the person is located in this state and is seeking to collect from a debtor that resides inside or outside the state, or is located outside of the state and is seeking to collect from a debtor that resides in this state. A license shall be obtained for the licensees principal place of business and shall not be transferred or assigned. A separate license is not required for each individual branch office.
(b)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), this division shall not apply to a depository institution, as defined in Section 1420, a person licensed pursuant to Division 9 (commencing with Section 22000) or Division 20 (commencing with Section 50000), a person licensed pursuant to Part 1 (commencing with Section 10000) of Division 4 of the Business and Professions Code, a person who is subject to the Karnette Rental-Purchase Act (Title 2.96 (commencing with Section 1812.620) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code), or a trustee performing acts in connection with a nonjudicial foreclosure pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 2920) of Chapter 2 of Title 14 of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code.
(2)The commissioner may use the authority described in Section 100005 in connection with a violation of Title 1.6C (commencing with Section 1788) or Title 1.6C.5 (commencing with Section 1788.50) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code by a person described in paragraph (1).
(c)This division shall not apply to debt collection regulated pursuant to Division 12.5 (commencing with Section 28100) or to the collection of covered commercial debt or covered commercial credit, as those terms are defined in Title 1.6C (commencing with Section 1788) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code.
SEC. 17.Section 7.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 1788.14 of the Civil Code proposed by both this bill and Senate Bill 1061. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2025, (2) each bill amends Section 1788.14 of the Civil Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 1061, in which case Section 7 of this bill shall not become operative.
SEC. 18.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
(a)The Legislature makes the following findings:
(1)The banking and credit system and grantors of credit to consumers are dependent upon the collection of just and owing debts. Unfair or deceptive collection practices undermine the public confidence, which is essential to the continued functioning of the banking and credit system and sound extensions of credit to consumers and small businesses.
(2)There is need to ensure that debt collectors and debtors exercise their responsibilities to one another with fairness, honesty and due regard for the rights of the other.
(b)It is the purpose of this title to prohibit debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of consumer debts and small business debts and to require debtors to act fairly in entering into and honoring those debts, as specified in this title.
(c)Nothing in this title is intended to create or impose an additional licensing requirement under Division 25 (commencing with Section 100000) of the Financial Code on a debt collector with respect to the collection of covered commercial debt or covered commercial credit.
(d)The provisions of this title related to covered commercial credit or covered commercial debt apply to covered commercial credit or covered commercial debt entered into, renewed, sold, or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
SEC. 2.Section 1788.2 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.2.(a)Definitions and rules of construction set forth in this section are applicable for the purpose of this title.
(b)The term debt collection means any act or practice in connection with the collection of covered debts.
(c)The term debt collector means any person who, in the ordinary course of business, regularly, on behalf of that person or others, engages in debt collection. The term includes any person who composes and sells, or offers to compose and sell, forms, letters, and other collection media used or intended to be used for debt collection.
(d)The term debt means money, property, or their equivalent that is due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person to another person.
(e)The term consumer credit transaction means a transaction between a natural person and another person in which property, services, or money is acquired on credit by that natural person from the other person primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
(f)The terms consumer debt and consumer credit mean money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person by reason of a consumer credit transaction. The term consumer debt includes a mortgage debt.
(g)The term person means a natural person, partnership, corporation, limited liability company, trust, estate, cooperative, association, or other similar entity.
(h)(1) Except as provided in Section 1788.18, the term debtor means a natural person from whom a debt collector seeks to collect a covered debt that is due and owing or alleged to be due and owing from that person.
(2)In relation to a covered commercial debt or covered commercial credit, a debtor shall mean a natural person who guarantees an obligation related to a covered commercial credit transaction.
(i)The term creditor means a person who extends covered credit to a debtor.
(j)The term consumer credit report means any written, oral, or other communication of any information by a consumer reporting agency bearing on a consumers creditworthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living that is used or expected to be used or collected in whole or in part for the purpose of serving as a factor in establishing the consumers eligibility for (1) credit or insurance to be used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, or (2) employment purposes, or (3) other purposes authorized under any applicable federal or state law or regulation. The term does not include (a) any report containing information solely as to transactions or experiences between the consumer and the person making the report; (b) any authorization or approval of a specific extension of credit directly or indirectly by the issuer of a credit card or similar device; or (c) any report in which a person who has been requested by a third party to make a specific extension of credit directly or indirectly to a consumer conveys that persons decision with respect to that request, if the third party advises the consumer of the name and address of the person to whom the request was made, and the person makes the disclosures to the consumer required under any applicable federal or state law or regulation.
(k)The term consumer reporting agency means any person that, for monetary fees, dues, or on a cooperative nonprofit basis, regularly engages, in whole or in part, in the practice of assembling or evaluating consumer credit information or other information on consumers for the purpose of furnishing consumer credit reports to third parties and uses any means or facility for the purpose of preparing or furnishing consumer credit reports.
(l)The term covered debt means a consumer debt or a covered commercial debt.
(m)The term covered credit means consumer credit or covered commercial credit.
(n)The terms covered commercial debt and covered commercial credit mean money due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person to a lender, a commercial financing provider, as defined in Section 22800 of the Financial Code, or a debt buyer, as defined in Section 1788.50, by reason of one or more covered commercial credit transactions, provided the total amount of all covered commercial credit transactions and all other noncovered commercial credit transactions due and owing by the debtor or other person obligated under the transactions to the same lender, commercial financing provider, or debt buyer is no more than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000).
(1)For credit owed to a lender or commercial financing provider, the total value of credit per transaction is determined as of when the transaction is first entered into and is the maximum amount that the creditor is contractually required to provide or make available to the debtor over the life of the transaction or is the maximum amount that is enumerated in an open-end credit agreement.
(2)The value of credit for each transaction for a debt buyer is the amount owing or alleged to be owing to the debt buyer when the debt buyer acquires the rights of the lender or commercial financing provider in the commercial credit.
(o)The term covered commercial credit transaction means a transaction between a person and another person in which a total value of no more than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000), is acquired on credit by that person from the other person for use primarily for other than personal, family, or household purposes.
SEC. 3.Section 1788.10 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.10.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following conduct:
(a)The use, or threat of use, of physical force or violence or any criminal means to cause harm to the person, or the reputation, or the property of any person.
(b)The threat that the failure to pay a covered debt will result in an accusation that the debtor has committed a crime where the accusation, if made, would be false.
(c)The communication of, or threat to communicate to any person the fact that a debtor has engaged in conduct, other than the failure to pay a covered debt, which the debt collector knows or has reason to believe will defame the debtor.
(d)The threat to the debtor to sell or assign to another person the obligation of the debtor to pay a covered debt, with an accompanying false representation that the result of the sale or assignment would be that the debtor would lose any defense to the covered debt.
(e)The threat to any person that nonpayment of the covered debt may result in the arrest of the debtor or the seizure, garnishment, attachment, or sale of any property or the garnishment or attachment of wages of the debtor, unless the action is in fact contemplated by the debt collector and permitted by the law.
(f)The threat to take any action against the debtor, which is prohibited by this title.
SEC. 4.Section 1788.11 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.11.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Using obscene or profane language.
(b)Placing a telephone call without disclosing the callers identity, provided that an employee of a licensed collection agency may identify oneself by using their registered alias name if they correctly identify the agency that they represent. A debt collector shall provide its California debt collector license number, if applicable, upon the consumers request.
(c)Causing expense to any person for long distance telephone calls, telegram fees, or charges for other similar communications, by misrepresenting to the person the purpose of the telephone call, telegram or similar communication.
(d)Causing a telephone to ring repeatedly or continuously to annoy the person called.
(e)Communicating, by telephone or in person, with the debtor with such frequency as to be unreasonable, and to constitute harassment of the debtor under the circumstances.
(f)Sending written or digital communication to the person that does not display the California license number of the collector, if applicable, in at least 12-point type.
SEC. 5.Section 1788.12 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.12.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt or consumer debt, as specified, by means of the following practices:
(a)Communicating with the debtors employer regarding the debtors consumer debt unless such a communication is necessary to the collection of the consumer debt, or unless the debtor or their attorney has consented in writing to that communication. A communication is necessary to the collection of the consumer debt only if it is made for the purposes of verifying the debtors employment, locating the debtor, or effecting garnishment, after judgment, of the debtors wages, or in the case of a medical debt for the purpose of discovering the existence of medical insurance. Any such communication, other than a communication in the case of a medical debt by a health care provider or its agent for the purpose of discovering the existence of medical insurance, shall be in writing unless that written communication receives no response within 15 days and shall be made only as many times as is necessary to the collection of the consumer debt. Communications to a debtors employer regarding a consumer debt shall not contain language that would be improper if the communication were made to the debtor. One communication solely for the purpose of verifying the debtors employment may be oral without prior written contact.
(b)Communicating information regarding a consumer debt to any member of the debtors family, other than the debtors spouse or the parents or guardians of the debtor who is either a minor or who resides in the same household with that parent or guardian, prior to obtaining a judgment against the debtor, except where the purpose of the communication is to locate the debtor, or where the debtor or their attorney has consented in writing to that communication.
(c)Communicating to any person any list of debtors that discloses the nature or existence of a covered debt, commonly known as deadbeat lists, or advertising any covered debt for sale, by naming the debtor.
(d)Communicating with the debtor by means of a written communication that displays or conveys any information about the covered debt or the debtor other than the name, address, and telephone number of the debtor and the debt collector and that is intended both to be seen by any other person and also to embarrass the debtor.
(e)Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this section, the disclosure, publication, or communication by a debt collector of information relating to a covered debt or the debtor to a consumer reporting agency or to any other person reasonably believed to have a legitimate business need for that information shall not be deemed to violate this title.
SEC. 6.Section 1788.13 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.13.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Any communication with the debtor other than in the name either of the debt collector or the person on whose behalf the debt collector is acting.
(b)Any false representation that any person is an attorney or counselor at law.
(c)Any communication with a debtor in the name of an attorney or counselor at law or upon stationery or like written instruments bearing the name of the attorney or counselor at law, unless that communication is by an attorney or counselor at law or shall have been approved or authorized by that attorney or counselor at law.
(d)The representation that any debt collector is vouched for, bonded by, affiliated with, or is an instrumentality, agent or official of any federal, state or local government or any agency of federal, state or local government, unless the collector is actually employed by the particular governmental agency in question and is acting on behalf of that agency in the debt collection matter.
(e)The false representation that the covered debt may be increased by the addition of attorneys fees, investigation fees, service fees, finance charges, or other charges if, in fact, those fees or charges may not legally be added to the existing obligation.
(f)The false representation that information concerning a debtors failure or alleged failure to pay a covered debt has been or is about to be referred to a consumer reporting agency.
(g)The false representation that a debt collector is a consumer reporting agency.
(h)The false representation that collection letters, notices or other printed forms are being sent by or on behalf of a claim, credit, audit, or legal department.
(i)The false representation of the true nature of the business or services being rendered by the debt collector.
(j)The false representation that a legal proceeding has been, is about to be, or will be instituted unless payment of a covered debt is made.
(k)The false representation that a covered debt has been, is about to be, or will be sold, assigned, or referred to a debt collector for collection.
(l)Any communication by a collection agency to a debtor demanding money unless the claim is actually assigned to the collection agency.
SEC. 7.Section 1788.14 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.14.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Obtaining an affirmation from a debtor of a covered debt that has been discharged in bankruptcy, without clearly and conspicuously disclosing to the debtor, in writing, at the time the affirmation is sought, the fact that the debtor is not legally obligated to make an affirmation.
(b)Collecting or attempting to collect from the debtor the whole or any part of the debt collectors fee or charge for services rendered, or other expense incurred by the debt collector in the collection of the covered debt, except as permitted by law.
(c)Initiating communications, other than statements of account, with the debtor with regard to the covered debt, when the debt collector has been previously notified in writing by the debtors attorney that the debtor is represented by the attorney with respect to the covered debt and the notice includes the attorneys name and address and a request by the attorney that all communications regarding the covered debt be addressed to the attorney, unless the attorney fails to answer correspondence, return telephone calls, or discuss the obligation in question. This subdivision shall not apply if prior approval has been obtained from the debtors attorney, or if the communication is a response in the ordinary course of business to a debtors inquiry.
(d)Sending a written communication to a debtor in an attempt to collect a time-barred debt without providing the debtor with one of the following written notices:
(1)If the debt is not past the date for obsolescence set forth in Section 605(a) of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681c), the following notice shall be included in the first written communication provided to the debtor after the debt has become time-barred:
The law limits how long you can be sued on a debt. Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it. If you do not pay the debt, [insert name of debt collector] may [continue to] report it to the credit reporting agencies as unpaid for as long as the law permits this reporting.
(2)If the debt is past the date for obsolescence set forth in Section 605(a) of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681c), the following notice shall be included in the first written communication provided to the debtor after the date for obsolescence:
The law limits how long you can be sued on a debt. Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it, and we will not report it to any credit reporting agency.
(e)Collecting consumer debt that originated with a hospital licensed pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code without including in the first written communication to the debtor a copy of the notice required pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 127425 of the Health and Safety Code and a statement that the debt collector will wait at least 180 days from the date the debtor was initially billed for the hospital services that are the basis of the debt before reporting adverse information to a credit reporting agency or filing a lawsuit against the debtor.
(f)For purposes of this section, first written communication means the first communication sent to the debtor in writing or by facsimile, email, or other similar means.
SEC. 7.5.Section 1788.14 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.14.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Obtaining an affirmation from a debtor of a covered debt that has been discharged in bankruptcy, without clearly and conspicuously disclosing to the debtor, in writing, at the time the affirmation is sought, the fact that the debtor is not legally obligated to make an affirmation.
(b)Collecting or attempting to collect from the debtor the whole or any part of the debt collectors fee or charge for services rendered, or other expense incurred by the debt collector in the collection of the covered debt, except as permitted by law.
(c)Initiating communications, other than statements of account, with the debtor with regard to the covered debt, when the debt collector has been previously notified in writing by the debtors attorney that the debtor is represented by the attorney with respect to the covered debt and the notice includes the attorneys name and address and a request by the attorney that all communications regarding the covered debt be addressed to the attorney, unless the attorney fails to answer correspondence, return telephone calls, or discuss the obligation in question. This subdivision shall not apply if prior approval has been obtained from the debtors attorney, or if the communication is a response in the ordinary course of business to a debtors inquiry.
(d)Sending a written communication to a debtor in an attempt to collect a time-barred debt without providing the debtor with one of the following written notices:
(1)If the debt is not past the date for obsolescence set forth in Section 605(a) of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681c), the following notice shall be included in the first written communication provided to the debtor after the debt has become time-barred:
The law limits how long you can be sued on a debt. Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it. If you do not pay the debt, [insert name of debt collector] may [continue to] report it to the credit reporting agencies as unpaid for as long as the law permits this reporting.
(2)If the debt is past the date for obsolescence set forth in Section 605(a) of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681c), the following notice shall be included in the first written communication provided to the debtor after the date for obsolescence:
The law limits how long you can be sued on a debt. Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it, and we will not report it to any credit reporting agency.
(e)Collecting consumer debt that originated with a hospital licensed pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code without including in the first written communication to the debtor a copy of the notice required pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 127425 of the Health and Safety Code and a statement that the debt collector will wait at least 180 days from the date the debtor was initially billed for the hospital services that are the basis of the debt before filing a lawsuit against the debtor.
(f)For purposes of this section, first written communication means the first communication sent to the debtor in writing or by facsimile, email, or other similar means.
SEC. 8.Section 1788.14.5 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.14.5.(a)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall provide to the debtor, upon the debtors written request, a statement that includes all of the following information pursuant to subdivision (c):
(1)That the debt collector has authority to assert the rights of the creditor to collect the debt.
(2)(A)The debt balance and an explanation of the amount, nature, and reason for all interest and fees, if any, imposed by the creditor or any subsequent entities to which the debt was assigned.
(B)The explanation required by subparagraph (A) shall identify separately the balance, the total of any interest, and the total of any fees.
(3)The date the debt became delinquent or the date of the last payment.
(4)The name and an address of the creditor and the creditors account number associated with the debt. The creditors name and address shall be in sufficient form so as to reasonably identify the creditor.
(5)The name and last known address of the debtor as they appeared in the creditors records before the assignment of the debt to the debt collector.
(6)The names and addresses of all persons or entities other than the debt collector to which the debt was assigned. The names and addresses shall be in sufficient form so as to reasonably identify each assignee.
(7)The California license number of the debt collector, if applicable.
(b)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall not make a written statement to a debtor in an attempt to collect a delinquent debt unless the debt collector has access to a copy of a contract or other document evidencing the debtors agreement to the debt, except in the following circumstances:
(1)If the claim is based on debt for which no signed contract or agreement exists, the debt collector shall have access to a copy of a document provided to the debtor while the account was active, demonstrating that the debt was incurred by the debtor.
(2)For a revolving credit account, the most recent monthly statement recording a purchase transaction, last payment, or balance transfer shall be deemed sufficient to satisfy the requirements of this subparagraph.
(c)(1)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall provide the information or documents identified in subdivisions (a) and (b) to the debtor without charge within 30 calendar days of receipt of a debtors written request for information regarding the debt or proof of the debt.
(2)If the debt collector cannot provide the information or documents within 30 calendar days, the debt collector shall cease all collection of the debt until the debt collector provides the debtor the information or documents described in subdivisions (a) and (b).
(d)(1)A debt collector shall provide a debtor with whom it has contact an active postal address to which a debtor may send a request for the information described in this section.
(2)A debt collector may also provide an active email address to which these requests can be sent and through which information and documents can be delivered if the parties agree.
(e)(1)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall include in its first written communication with the debtor in no smaller than 12-point type, a separate prominent notice that contains the following statement:
You may request records showing the following: (1) that [insert name of debt collector] has the right to seek collection of the debt; (2) the debt balance, including an explanation of any interest charges and additional fees; (3) the date the debt became delinquent or the date of the last payment; (4) the name of the creditor and the account number associated with the debt; (5) the name and last known address of the debtor as it appeared in the creditors records prior to assignment of the debt; and (6) the names of all persons or entities other than the debt collector to which the debt has been assigned, if applicable. You may also request from us a copy of the contract or other document evidencing your agreement to the debt.
A request for these records may be addressed to: [insert debt collectors active mailing address and email address, if applicable].
(2)If a language other than English is principally used by the debt collector in the initial oral contact with the debtor, the notice required by this subdivision shall be provided to the debtor in that language within five business days.
(f)(1)A debt buyer that complies with the requirements of Section 1788.52 shall be deemed to be in compliance with this section.
(2)For purposes of this subdivision, debt buyer shall have the same meaning as in Section 1788.50.
(g)For the purposes of this section, the term delinquent debt means a covered debt, other than a mortgage debt, that is past due at least 90 days and has not been charged off.
(h)This section shall apply to all delinquent consumer debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2022.
(i)This section shall apply to all delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
SEC. 9.Section 1788.15 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.15.(a)No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of judicial proceedings when the debt collector knows that service of process, where essential to jurisdiction over the debtor or their property, has not been legally effected.
(b)No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt, other than one reduced to judgment, by means of judicial proceedings in a county other than the county in which the debtor has incurred the covered debt or the county in which the debtor resides at the time those proceedings are instituted, or resided at the time the debt was incurred.
(c)Notwithstanding subdivision (b), when the obligation of the debtor arises from a guaranty by the debtor of a covered commercial debt, a debt collector may collect or attempt to collect covered commercial debt by means of a judicial proceeding in the county in which the nonnatural person for whose purpose the commercial debt was incurred is located.
(d)This section shall apply to all delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
SEC. 10.Section 1788.16 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.16.It is unlawful, with respect to attempted collection of a covered debt, for a debt collector, creditor, or an attorney to send a communication that simulates legal or judicial process or that gives the appearance of being authorized, issued, or approved by a governmental agency or attorney when it is not. Any violation of the provisions of this section is a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) or by both.
SEC. 11.Section 1788.17 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.17.Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, every debt collector collecting or attempting to collect a consumer debt shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1692b to 1692j, inclusive, of, and shall be subject to the remedies in Section 1692k of, Title 15 of the United States Code. However, subsection (11) of Section 1692e and Section 1692g shall not apply to any person specified in paragraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (6) of Section 1692a of Title 15 of the United States Code or that persons principal. The references to federal codes in this section refer to those codes as they read January 1, 2001.
SEC. 12.Section 1788.18 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.18.(a)Upon receipt from a debtor of all of the following, a debt collector shall cease collection activities until completion of the review provided in subdivision (d):
(1)A copy of a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) identity theft report, completed and signed by the debtor. The debtor may choose, instead, to send a copy of a police report filed by the debtor alleging that the debtor is the victim of an identity theft crime, including, but not limited to, a violation of Section 530.5 of the Penal Code, for the specific debt being collected by the debt collector; however, the debt collector shall not also require a police report if the debtor submits an FTC identity theft report.
(2)The debtors written statement that the debtor claims to be the victim of identity theft with respect to the specific debt being collected by the debt collector.
(b)The written statement described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) shall consist of either of the following:
(1)A written statement that contains the content of the Identity Theft Victims Fraudulent Account Information Request offered to the public by the California Office of Privacy Protection.
(2)A written statement that certifies that the representations are true, correct, and contain no material omissions of fact to the best knowledge and belief of the person submitting the certification. A person submitting the certification who declares as true any material matter pursuant to this subdivision that they know to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor. The statement shall contain or be accompanied by the following, to the extent that an item listed below is relevant to the debtors allegation of identity theft with respect to the debt in question:
(A)A statement that the debtor is a victim of identity theft.
(B)A copy of the debtors drivers license or identification card, as issued by the state.
(C)Any other identification document that supports the statement of identity theft.
(D)Specific facts supporting the claim of identity theft, if available.
(E)Any explanation showing that the debtor did not incur the debt.
(F)Any available correspondence disputing the debt after transaction information has been provided to the debtor.
(G)Documentation of the residence of the debtor at the time of the alleged debt. This may include copies of bills and statements, such as utility bills, tax statements, or other statements from businesses sent to the debtor, showing that the debtor lived at another residence at the time the debt was incurred.
(H)A telephone number for contacting the debtor concerning any additional information or questions, or direction that further communications to the debtor be in writing only, with the mailing address specified in the statement.
(I)To the extent the debtor has information concerning who may have incurred the debt, the identification of any person whom the debtor believes is responsible.
(J)An express statement that the debtor did not authorize the use of the debtors name or personal information for incurring the debt.
(K)The certification required pursuant to this paragraph shall be sufficient if it is in substantially the following form:
I certify the representations made are true, correct, and | |
(Date and Place)(Signature) |
(c)If a debtor notifies a debt collector orally that they are a victim of identity theft, the debt collector shall notify the debtor, orally or in writing, that the debtors claim must be in writing. If a debtor notifies a debt collector in writing that they are a victim of identity theft, but omits information required pursuant to subdivision (a) or, if applicable, the certification required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), if the debt collector does not cease collection activities, the debt collector shall provide written notice to the debtor of the additional information that is required, or the certification required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), as applicable, or send the debtor a copy of the Federal Trade Commissions identity theft form.
(d)Within 10 business days of receiving the complete statement and information described in subdivision (a), the debt collector shall, if it furnished adverse information about the debtor to a consumer credit reporting agency, notify the consumer credit reporting agency that the account is disputed, and initiate a review considering all of the information provided by the debtor and other information available to the debt collector in its file or from the creditor. The debt collector shall send notice of its determination to the debtor no later than 10 business days after concluding the review. The debt collector may recommence debt collection activities only upon making a good faith determination that the information does not establish that the debtor is not responsible for the specific debt in question. The debt collectors determination shall be made in a manner consistent with the provisions of subsection (1) of Section 1692f of Title 15 of the United States Code, as incorporated by Section 1788.17 of this code. The debt collector shall notify the debtor in writing of that determination and the basis for that determination before proceeding with any further collection activities. The debt collectors determination shall be based on all of the information provided by the debtor and other information available to the debt collector in its file or from the creditor.
(e)No inference or presumption that the debt is valid or invalid, or that the debtor is liable or not liable for the debt, shall arise if the debt collector decides after the review described in subdivision (d) to cease or recommence the debt collection activities. The exercise or nonexercise of rights under this section is not a waiver of any other right or defense of the debtor or debt collector.
(f)The statement and supporting documents that comply with subdivision (a) may also satisfy, to the extent those documents meet the requirements of, the notice requirement of paragraph (5) of subdivision (c) of Section 1798.93.
(g)A debt collector who ceases collection activities under this section and does not recommence those collection activities shall do both of the following:
(1)If the debt collector has furnished adverse information to a consumer credit reporting agency, notify the agency to delete that information no later than 10 business days after making its determination.
(2)Notify the creditor no later than 10 business days after making its determination that debt collection activities have been terminated based upon the debtors claim of identity theft.
(h)A debt collector who has possession of documents that the debtor is entitled to request from a creditor pursuant to Section 530.8 of the Penal Code is authorized to provide those documents to the debtor.
(i)Notwithstanding subdivision (h) of Section 1788.2, for the purposes of this section, debtor means a natural person, firm, association, organization, partnership, business trust, company, corporation, or limited liability company from which a debt collector seeks to collect a debt that is due and owing or alleged to be due and owing from the person or entity. The remedies provided by this title shall apply equally to violations of this section.
SEC. 13.Section 1788.20 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.20.In connection with any request or application for covered credit, no person shall:
(a)Request or apply for that credit at a time when that person knows there is no reasonable probability of that persons being able, or that person then lacks the intention, to pay the obligation created thereby in accordance with the terms and conditions of the credit extension.
(b)Knowingly submit false or inaccurate information or willfully conceal adverse information bearing upon that persons credit worthiness, credit standing, or credit capacity.
SEC. 14.Section 1788.21 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.21.(a)In connection with any covered credit existing or requested to be extended to a person, that person shall within a reasonable time notify the creditor or prospective creditor of any change in that persons name, address, or employment.
(b)Each responsibility set forth in subdivision (a) shall apply only if and after the creditor clearly and conspicuously in writing discloses that responsibility to that person.
SEC. 15.Section 1788.22 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.22.(a)In connection with any covered credit extended to a person under an account:
(1)No such person shall attempt to consummate any covered credit transaction thereunder knowing that credit privileges under the account have been terminated or suspended.
(2)Each such person shall notify the creditor by telephone, telegraph, letter, or any other reasonable means that an unauthorized use of the account has occurred or may occur as the result of loss or theft of a credit card, or other instrument identifying the account, within a reasonable time after that persons discovery thereof, and shall reasonably assist the creditor in determining the facts and circumstances relating to any unauthorized use of the account.
(b)Each responsibility set forth in subdivision (a) shall apply only if and after the creditor clearly and conspicuously in writing discloses that responsibility to that person.
SEC. 16.Section 100001 of the Financial Code is amended to read:100001.(a)No person shall engage in the business of debt collection in this state without first obtaining a license pursuant to this division. To the extent permitted by federal law, a person is acting in this state if the person is located in this state and is seeking to collect from a debtor that resides inside or outside the state, or is located outside of the state and is seeking to collect from a debtor that resides in this state. A license shall be obtained for the licensees principal place of business and shall not be transferred or assigned. A separate license is not required for each individual branch office.
(b)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), this division shall not apply to a depository institution, as defined in Section 1420, a person licensed pursuant to Division 9 (commencing with Section 22000) or Division 20 (commencing with Section 50000), a person licensed pursuant to Part 1 (commencing with Section 10000) of Division 4 of the Business and Professions Code, a person who is subject to the Karnette Rental-Purchase Act (Title 2.96 (commencing with Section 1812.620) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code), or a trustee performing acts in connection with a nonjudicial foreclosure pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 2920) of Chapter 2 of Title 14 of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code.
(2)The commissioner may use the authority described in Section 100005 in connection with a violation of Title 1.6C (commencing with Section 1788) or Title 1.6C.5 (commencing with Section 1788.50) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code by a person described in paragraph (1).
(c)This division shall not apply to debt collection regulated pursuant to Division 12.5 (commencing with Section 28100) or to the collection of covered commercial debt or covered commercial credit, as those terms are defined in Title 1.6C (commencing with Section 1788) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code.
SEC. 17.Section 7.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 1788.14 of the Civil Code proposed by both this bill and Senate Bill 1061. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2025, (2) each bill amends Section 1788.14 of the Civil Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 1061, in which case Section 7 of this bill shall not become operative.
SEC. 18.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
(a)The Legislature makes the following findings:
(1)The banking and credit system and grantors of credit to consumers are dependent upon the collection of just and owing debts. Unfair or deceptive collection practices undermine the public confidence, which is essential to the continued functioning of the banking and credit system and sound extensions of credit to consumers and small businesses.
(2)There is need to ensure that debt collectors and debtors exercise their responsibilities to one another with fairness, honesty and due regard for the rights of the other.
(b)It is the purpose of this title to prohibit debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of consumer debts and small business debts and to require debtors to act fairly in entering into and honoring those debts, as specified in this title.
(c)Nothing in this title is intended to create or impose an additional licensing requirement under Division 25 (commencing with Section 100000) of the Financial Code on a debt collector with respect to the collection of covered commercial debt or covered commercial credit.
(d)The provisions of this title related to covered commercial credit or covered commercial debt apply to covered commercial credit or covered commercial debt entered into, renewed, sold, or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
SEC. 2.Section 1788.2 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.2.(a)Definitions and rules of construction set forth in this section are applicable for the purpose of this title.
(b)The term debt collection means any act or practice in connection with the collection of covered debts.
(c)The term debt collector means any person who, in the ordinary course of business, regularly, on behalf of that person or others, engages in debt collection. The term includes any person who composes and sells, or offers to compose and sell, forms, letters, and other collection media used or intended to be used for debt collection.
(d)The term debt means money, property, or their equivalent that is due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person to another person.
(e)The term consumer credit transaction means a transaction between a natural person and another person in which property, services, or money is acquired on credit by that natural person from the other person primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
(f)The terms consumer debt and consumer credit mean money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person by reason of a consumer credit transaction. The term consumer debt includes a mortgage debt.
(g)The term person means a natural person, partnership, corporation, limited liability company, trust, estate, cooperative, association, or other similar entity.
(h)(1) Except as provided in Section 1788.18, the term debtor means a natural person from whom a debt collector seeks to collect a covered debt that is due and owing or alleged to be due and owing from that person.
(2)In relation to a covered commercial debt or covered commercial credit, a debtor shall mean a natural person who guarantees an obligation related to a covered commercial credit transaction.
(i)The term creditor means a person who extends covered credit to a debtor.
(j)The term consumer credit report means any written, oral, or other communication of any information by a consumer reporting agency bearing on a consumers creditworthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living that is used or expected to be used or collected in whole or in part for the purpose of serving as a factor in establishing the consumers eligibility for (1) credit or insurance to be used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, or (2) employment purposes, or (3) other purposes authorized under any applicable federal or state law or regulation. The term does not include (a) any report containing information solely as to transactions or experiences between the consumer and the person making the report; (b) any authorization or approval of a specific extension of credit directly or indirectly by the issuer of a credit card or similar device; or (c) any report in which a person who has been requested by a third party to make a specific extension of credit directly or indirectly to a consumer conveys that persons decision with respect to that request, if the third party advises the consumer of the name and address of the person to whom the request was made, and the person makes the disclosures to the consumer required under any applicable federal or state law or regulation.
(k)The term consumer reporting agency means any person that, for monetary fees, dues, or on a cooperative nonprofit basis, regularly engages, in whole or in part, in the practice of assembling or evaluating consumer credit information or other information on consumers for the purpose of furnishing consumer credit reports to third parties and uses any means or facility for the purpose of preparing or furnishing consumer credit reports.
(l)The term covered debt means a consumer debt or a covered commercial debt.
(m)The term covered credit means consumer credit or covered commercial credit.
(n)The terms covered commercial debt and covered commercial credit mean money, property, or their equivalent, money due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person to a lender, a commercial financing provider, as defined in Section 22800 of the Financial Code, or a debt buyer, as defined in Section 1788.50, by reason of a one or more covered commercial credit transaction. transactions, provided the total amount of all covered commercial credit transactions and all other noncovered commercial credit transactions due and owing by the debtor or other person obligated under the transactions to the same lender, commercial financing provider, or debt buyer is no more than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000).
(1)For credit owed to a lender or commercial financing provider, the total value of credit per transaction is determined as of when the transaction is first entered into and is the maximum amount that the creditor is contractually required to provide or make available to the debtor over the life of the transaction or is the maximum amount that is enumerated in an open-end credit agreement.
(2)The value of credit for each transaction for a debt buyer is the amount owing or alleged to be owing to the debt buyer when the debt buyer acquires the rights of the lender or commercial financing provider in the commercial credit.
(o)The term covered commercial credit transaction means a transaction between a person and another person in which property, services, or money, of a total value of no more than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000), is acquired on credit by that person from the other person for use primarily for other than personal, family, or household purposes.
SEC. 3.Section 1788.10 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.10.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following conduct:
(a)The use, or threat of use, of physical force or violence or any criminal means to cause harm to the person, or the reputation, or the property of any person.
(b)The threat that the failure to pay a covered debt will result in an accusation that the debtor has committed a crime where the accusation, if made, would be false.
(c)The communication of, or threat to communicate to any person the fact that a debtor has engaged in conduct, other than the failure to pay a covered debt, which the debt collector knows or has reason to believe will defame the debtor.
(d)The threat to the debtor to sell or assign to another person the obligation of the debtor to pay a covered debt, with an accompanying false representation that the result of the sale or assignment would be that the debtor would lose any defense to the covered debt.
(e)The threat to any person that nonpayment of the covered debt may result in the arrest of the debtor or the seizure, garnishment, attachment, or sale of any property or the garnishment or attachment of wages of the debtor, unless the action is in fact contemplated by the debt collector and permitted by the law.
(f)The threat to take any action against the debtor, which is prohibited by this title.
SEC. 4.Section 1788.11 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.11.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Using obscene or profane language.
(b)Placing a telephone call without disclosing the callers identity, provided that an employee of a licensed collection agency may identify oneself by using their registered alias name if they correctly identify the agency that they represent. A debt collector shall provide its California debt collector license number, if applicable, upon the consumers request.
(c)Causing expense to any person for long distance telephone calls, telegram fees, or charges for other similar communications, by misrepresenting to the person the purpose of the telephone call, telegram or similar communication.
(d)Causing a telephone to ring repeatedly or continuously to annoy the person called.
(e)Communicating, by telephone or in person, with the debtor with such frequency as to be unreasonable, and to constitute harassment of the debtor under the circumstances.
(f)Sending written or digital communication to the person that does not display the California license number of the collector, if applicable, in at least 12-point type.
SEC. 5.Section 1788.12 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.12.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt or consumer debt, as specified, by means of the following practices:
(a)Communicating with the debtors employer regarding the debtors consumer debt unless such a communication is necessary to the collection of the consumer debt, or unless the debtor or their attorney has consented in writing to that communication. A communication is necessary to the collection of the consumer debt only if it is made for the purposes of verifying the debtors employment, locating the debtor, or effecting garnishment, after judgment, of the debtors wages, or in the case of a medical debt for the purpose of discovering the existence of medical insurance. Any such communication, other than a communication in the case of a medical debt by a health care provider or its agent for the purpose of discovering the existence of medical insurance, shall be in writing unless that written communication receives no response within 15 days and shall be made only as many times as is necessary to the collection of the consumer debt. Communications to a debtors employer regarding a consumer debt shall not contain language that would be improper if the communication were made to the debtor. One communication solely for the purpose of verifying the debtors employment may be oral without prior written contact.
(b)Communicating information regarding a consumer debt to any member of the debtors family, other than the debtors spouse or the parents or guardians of the debtor who is either a minor or who resides in the same household with that parent or guardian, prior to obtaining a judgment against the debtor, except where the purpose of the communication is to locate the debtor, or where the debtor or their attorney has consented in writing to that communication.
(c)Communicating to any person any list of debtors that discloses the nature or existence of a covered debt, commonly known as deadbeat lists, or advertising any covered debt for sale, by naming the debtor.
(d)Communicating with the debtor by means of a written communication that displays or conveys any information about the covered debt or the debtor other than the name, address, and telephone number of the debtor and the debt collector and that is intended both to be seen by any other person and also to embarrass the debtor.
(e)Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this section, the disclosure, publication, or communication by a debt collector of information relating to a covered debt or the debtor to a consumer reporting agency or to any other person reasonably believed to have a legitimate business need for that information shall not be deemed to violate this title.
SEC. 6.Section 1788.13 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.13.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Any communication with the debtor other than in the name either of the debt collector or the person on whose behalf the debt collector is acting.
(b)Any false representation that any person is an attorney or counselor at law.
(c)Any communication with a debtor in the name of an attorney or counselor at law or upon stationery or like written instruments bearing the name of the attorney or counselor at law, unless that communication is by an attorney or counselor at law or shall have been approved or authorized by that attorney or counselor at law.
(d)The representation that any debt collector is vouched for, bonded by, affiliated with, or is an instrumentality, agent or official of any federal, state or local government or any agency of federal, state or local government, unless the collector is actually employed by the particular governmental agency in question and is acting on behalf of that agency in the debt collection matter.
(e)The false representation that the covered debt may be increased by the addition of attorneys fees, investigation fees, service fees, finance charges, or other charges if, in fact, those fees or charges may not legally be added to the existing obligation.
(f)The false representation that information concerning a debtors failure or alleged failure to pay a covered debt has been or is about to be referred to a consumer reporting agency.
(g)The false representation that a debt collector is a consumer reporting agency.
(h)The false representation that collection letters, notices or other printed forms are being sent by or on behalf of a claim, credit, audit, or legal department.
(i)The false representation of the true nature of the business or services being rendered by the debt collector.
(j)The false representation that a legal proceeding has been, is about to be, or will be instituted unless payment of a covered debt is made.
(k)The false representation that a covered debt has been, is about to be, or will be sold, assigned, or referred to a debt collector for collection.
(l)Any communication by a collection agency to a debtor demanding money unless the claim is actually assigned to the collection agency.
SEC. 7.Section 1788.14 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.14.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Obtaining an affirmation from a debtor of a covered debt that has been discharged in bankruptcy, without clearly and conspicuously disclosing to the debtor, in writing, at the time the affirmation is sought, the fact that the debtor is not legally obligated to make an affirmation.
(b)Collecting or attempting to collect from the debtor the whole or any part of the debt collectors fee or charge for services rendered, or other expense incurred by the debt collector in the collection of the covered debt, except as permitted by law.
(c)Initiating communications, other than statements of account, with the debtor with regard to the covered debt, when the debt collector has been previously notified in writing by the debtors attorney that the debtor is represented by the attorney with respect to the covered debt and the notice includes the attorneys name and address and a request by the attorney that all communications regarding the covered debt be addressed to the attorney, unless the attorney fails to answer correspondence, return telephone calls, or discuss the obligation in question. This subdivision shall not apply if prior approval has been obtained from the debtors attorney, or if the communication is a response in the ordinary course of business to a debtors inquiry.
(d)Sending a written communication to a debtor in an attempt to collect a time-barred debt without providing the debtor with one of the following written notices:
(1)If the debt is not past the date for obsolescence set forth in Section 605(a) of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681c), the following notice shall be included in the first written communication provided to the debtor after the debt has become time-barred:
The law limits how long you can be sued on a debt. Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it. If you do not pay the debt, [insert name of debt collector] may [continue to] report it to the credit reporting agencies as unpaid for as long as the law permits this reporting.
(2)If the debt is past the date for obsolescence set forth in Section 605(a) of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681c), the following notice shall be included in the first written communication provided to the debtor after the date for obsolescence:
The law limits how long you can be sued on a debt. Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it, and we will not report it to any credit reporting agency.
(e)Collecting consumer debt that originated with a hospital licensed pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code without including in the first written communication to the debtor a copy of the notice required pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 127425 of the Health and Safety Code and a statement that the debt collector will wait at least 180 days from the date the debtor was initially billed for the hospital services that are the basis of the debt before reporting adverse information to a credit reporting agency or filing a lawsuit against the debtor.
(f)For purposes of this section, first written communication means the first communication sent to the debtor in writing or by facsimile, email, or other similar means.
SEC. 7.5.Section 1788.14 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.14.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a consumer covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Obtaining an affirmation from a debtor of a consumer covered debt that has been discharged in bankruptcy, without clearly and conspicuously disclosing to the debtor, in writing, at the time the affirmation is sought, the fact that the debtor is not legally obligated to make an affirmation.
(b)Collecting or attempting to collect from the debtor the whole or any part of the debt collectors fee or charge for services rendered, or other expense incurred by the debt collector in the collection of the consumer covered debt, except as permitted by law.
(c)Initiating communications, other than statements of account, with the debtor with regard to the consumer covered debt, when the debt collector has been previously notified in writing by the debtors attorney that the debtor is represented by the attorney with respect to the consumer covered debt and the notice includes the attorneys name and address and a request by the attorney that all communications regarding the consumer covered debt be addressed to the attorney, unless the attorney fails to answer correspondence, return telephone calls, or discuss the obligation in question. This subdivision shall not apply if prior approval has been obtained from the debtors attorney, or if the communication is a response in the ordinary course of business to a debtors inquiry.
(d)Sending a written communication to a debtor in an attempt to collect a time-barred debt without providing the debtor with one of the following written notices:
(1)If the debt is not past the date for obsolescence set forth in Section 605(a) of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681c), the following notice shall be included in the first written communication provided to the debtor after the debt has become time-barred:
The law limits how long you can be sued on a debt. Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it. If you do not pay the debt, [insert name of debt collector] may [continue to] report it to the credit reporting agencies as unpaid for as long as the law permits this reporting.
(2)If the debt is past the date for obsolescence set forth in Section 605(a) of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681c), the following notice shall be included in the first written communication provided to the debtor after the date for obsolescence:
The law limits how long you can be sued on a debt. Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it, and we will not report it to any credit reporting agency.
(e)Collecting consumer debt that originated with a hospital licensed pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code without including in the first written communication to the debtor a copy of the notice required pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 127425 of the Health and Safety Code and a statement that the debt collector will wait at least 180 days from the date the debtor was initially billed for the hospital services that are the basis of the debt before reporting adverse information to a credit reporting agency or filing a lawsuit against the debtor.
(f)For purposes of this section, first written communication means the first communication sent to the debtor in writing or by facsimile, email, or other similar means.
SEC. 8.Section 1788.14.5 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.14.5.(a)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall provide to the debtor, upon the debtors written request, a statement that includes all of the following information pursuant to subdivision (c):
(1)That the debt collector has authority to assert the rights of the creditor to collect the debt.
(2)(A)The debt balance and an explanation of the amount, nature, and reason for all interest and fees, if any, imposed by the creditor or any subsequent entities to which the debt was assigned.
(B)The explanation required by subparagraph (A) shall identify separately the balance, the total of any interest, and the total of any fees.
(3)The date the debt became delinquent or the date of the last payment.
(4)The name and an address of the creditor and the creditors account number associated with the debt. The creditors name and address shall be in sufficient form so as to reasonably identify the creditor.
(5)The name and last known address of the debtor as they appeared in the creditors records before the assignment of the debt to the debt collector.
(6)The names and addresses of all persons or entities other than the debt collector to which the debt was assigned. The names and addresses shall be in sufficient form so as to reasonably identify each assignee.
(7)The California license number of the debt collector, if applicable.
(b)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall not make a written statement to a debtor in an attempt to collect a delinquent debt unless the debt collector has access to a copy of a contract or other document evidencing the debtors agreement to the debt, except in the following circumstances:
(1)If the claim is based on debt for which no signed contract or agreement exists, the debt collector shall have access to a copy of a document provided to the debtor while the account was active, demonstrating that the debt was incurred by the debtor.
(2)For a revolving credit account, the most recent monthly statement recording a purchase transaction, last payment, or balance transfer shall be deemed sufficient to satisfy the requirements of this subparagraph.
(c)(1)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall provide the information or documents identified in subdivisions (a) and (b) to the debtor without charge within 30 calendar days of receipt of a debtors written request for information regarding the debt or proof of the debt.
(2)If the debt collector cannot provide the information or documents within 30 calendar days, the debt collector shall cease all collection of the debt until the debt collector provides the debtor the information or documents described in subdivisions (a) and (b).
(d)(1)A debt collector shall provide a debtor with whom it has contact an active postal address to which a debtor may send a request for the information described in this section.
(2)A debt collector may also provide an active email address to which these requests can be sent and through which information and documents can be delivered if the parties agree.
(e)(1)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall include in its first written communication with the debtor in no smaller than 12-point type, a separate prominent notice that contains the following statement:
You may request records showing the following: (1) that [insert name of debt collector] has the right to seek collection of the debt; (2) the debt balance, including an explanation of any interest charges and additional fees; (3) the date the debt became delinquent or the date of the last payment; (4) the name of the creditor and the account number associated with the debt; (5) the name and last known address of the debtor as it appeared in the creditors records prior to assignment of the debt; and (6) the names of all persons or entities other than the debt collector to which the debt has been assigned, if applicable. You may also request from us a copy of the contract or other document evidencing your agreement to the debt.
A request for these records may be addressed to: [insert debt collectors active mailing address and email address, if applicable].
(2)If a language other than English is principally used by the debt collector in the initial oral contact with the debtor, the notice required by this subdivision shall be provided to the debtor in that language within five business days.
(f)(1)A debt buyer that complies with the requirements of Section 1788.52 shall be deemed to be in compliance with this section.
(2)For purposes of this subdivision, debt buyer shall have the same meaning as in Section 1788.50.
(g)For the purposes of this section, the term delinquent debt means a covered debt, other than a mortgage debt, that is past due at least 90 days and has not been charged off.
(h)This section shall apply to all delinquent consumer debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2022.
(i)This section shall apply to all delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
SEC. 9.Section 1788.15 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.15.(a)No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of judicial proceedings when the debt collector knows that service of process, where essential to jurisdiction over the debtor or their property, has not been legally effected.
(b)No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt, other than one reduced to judgment, by means of judicial proceedings in a county other than the county in which the debtor has incurred the covered debt or the county in which the debtor resides at the time those proceedings are instituted, or resided at the time the debt was incurred.
(c)Notwithstanding subdivision (b), when the obligation of the debtor arises from a guaranty by the debtor of a covered commercial debt, a debt collector may collect or attempt to collect covered commercial debt by means of a judicial proceeding in the county in which the non-natural nonnatural person for whose purpose the commercial debt was incurred is located.
(d)This section shall apply to all delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
SEC. 10.Section 1788.16 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.16.It is unlawful, with respect to attempted collection of a covered debt, for a debt collector, creditor, or an attorney to send a communication that simulates legal or judicial process or that gives the appearance of being authorized, issued, or approved by a governmental agency or attorney when it is not. Any violation of the provisions of this section is a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) or by both.
SEC. 11.Section 1788.17 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.17.Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, every debt collector collecting or attempting to collect a consumer debt shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1692b to 1692j, inclusive, of, and shall be subject to the remedies in Section 1692k of, Title 15 of the United States Code. However, subsection (11) of Section 1692e and Section 1692g shall not apply to any person specified in paragraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (6) of Section 1692a of Title 15 of the United States Code or that persons principal. The references to federal codes in this section refer to those codes as they read January 1, 2001.
SEC. 12.Section 1788.18 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.18.(a)Upon receipt from a debtor of all of the following, a debt collector shall cease collection activities until completion of the review provided in subdivision (d):
(1)A copy of a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) identity theft report, completed and signed by the debtor. The debtor may choose, instead, to send a copy of a police report filed by the debtor alleging that the debtor is the victim of an identity theft crime, including, but not limited to, a violation of Section 530.5 of the Penal Code, for the specific debt being collected by the debt collector; however, the debt collector shall not also require a police report if the debtor submits an FTC identity theft report.
(2)The debtors written statement that the debtor claims to be the victim of identity theft with respect to the specific debt being collected by the debt collector.
(b)The written statement described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) shall consist of either of the following:
(1)A written statement that contains the content of the Identity Theft Victims Fraudulent Account Information Request offered to the public by the California Office of Privacy Protection.
(2)A written statement that certifies that the representations are true, correct, and contain no material omissions of fact to the best knowledge and belief of the person submitting the certification. A person submitting the certification who declares as true any material matter pursuant to this subdivision that they know to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor. The statement shall contain or be accompanied by the following, to the extent that an item listed below is relevant to the debtors allegation of identity theft with respect to the debt in question:
(A)A statement that the debtor is a victim of identity theft.
(B)A copy of the debtors drivers license or identification card, as issued by the state.
(C)Any other identification document that supports the statement of identity theft.
(D)Specific facts supporting the claim of identity theft, if available.
(E)Any explanation showing that the debtor did not incur the debt.
(F)Any available correspondence disputing the debt after transaction information has been provided to the debtor.
(G)Documentation of the residence of the debtor at the time of the alleged debt. This may include copies of bills and statements, such as utility bills, tax statements, or other statements from businesses sent to the debtor, showing that the debtor lived at another residence at the time the debt was incurred.
(H)A telephone number for contacting the debtor concerning any additional information or questions, or direction that further communications to the debtor be in writing only, with the mailing address specified in the statement.
(I)To the extent the debtor has information concerning who may have incurred the debt, the identification of any person whom the debtor believes is responsible.
(J)An express statement that the debtor did not authorize the use of the debtors name or personal information for incurring the debt.
(K)The certification required pursuant to this paragraph shall be sufficient if it is in substantially the following form:
I certify the representations made are true, correct, and | |
(Date and Place)(Signature) |
(c)If a debtor notifies a debt collector orally that they are a victim of identity theft, the debt collector shall notify the debtor, orally or in writing, that the debtors claim must be in writing. If a debtor notifies a debt collector in writing that they are a victim of identity theft, but omits information required pursuant to subdivision (a) or, if applicable, the certification required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), if the debt collector does not cease collection activities, the debt collector shall provide written notice to the debtor of the additional information that is required, or the certification required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), as applicable, or send the debtor a copy of the Federal Trade Commissions identity theft form.
(d)Within 10 business days of receiving the complete statement and information described in subdivision (a), the debt collector shall, if it furnished adverse information about the debtor to a consumer credit reporting agency, notify the consumer credit reporting agency that the account is disputed, and initiate a review considering all of the information provided by the debtor and other information available to the debt collector in its file or from the creditor. The debt collector shall send notice of its determination to the debtor no later than 10 business days after concluding the review. The debt collector may recommence debt collection activities only upon making a good faith determination that the information does not establish that the debtor is not responsible for the specific debt in question. The debt collectors determination shall be made in a manner consistent with the provisions of subsection (1) of Section 1692f of Title 15 of the United States Code, as incorporated by Section 1788.17 of this code. The debt collector shall notify the debtor in writing of that determination and the basis for that determination before proceeding with any further collection activities. The debt collectors determination shall be based on all of the information provided by the debtor and other information available to the debt collector in its file or from the creditor.
(e)No inference or presumption that the debt is valid or invalid, or that the debtor is liable or not liable for the debt, shall arise if the debt collector decides after the review described in subdivision (d) to cease or recommence the debt collection activities. The exercise or nonexercise of rights under this section is not a waiver of any other right or defense of the debtor or debt collector.
(f)The statement and supporting documents that comply with subdivision (a) may also satisfy, to the extent those documents meet the requirements of, the notice requirement of paragraph (5) of subdivision (c) of Section 1798.93.
(g)A debt collector who ceases collection activities under this section and does not recommence those collection activities shall do both of the following:
(1)If the debt collector has furnished adverse information to a consumer credit reporting agency, notify the agency to delete that information no later than 10 business days after making its determination.
(2)Notify the creditor no later than 10 business days after making its determination that debt collection activities have been terminated based upon the debtors claim of identity theft.
(h)A debt collector who has possession of documents that the debtor is entitled to request from a creditor pursuant to Section 530.8 of the Penal Code is authorized to provide those documents to the debtor.
(i)Notwithstanding subdivision (h) of Section 1788.2, for the purposes of this section, debtor means a natural person, firm, association, organization, partnership, business trust, company, corporation, or limited liability company from which a debt collector seeks to collect a debt that is due and owing or alleged to be due and owing from the person or entity. The remedies provided by this title shall apply equally to violations of this section.
SEC. 13.Section 1788.20 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.20.In connection with any request or application for covered credit, no person shall:
(a)Request or apply for that credit at a time when that person knows there is no reasonable probability of that persons being able, or that person then lacks the intention, to pay the obligation created thereby in accordance with the terms and conditions of the credit extension.
(b)Knowingly submit false or inaccurate information or willfully conceal adverse information bearing upon that persons credit worthiness, credit standing, or credit capacity.
SEC. 14.Section 1788.21 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.21.(a)In connection with any covered credit existing or requested to be extended to a person, that person shall within a reasonable time notify the creditor or prospective creditor of any change in that persons name, address, or employment.
(b)Each responsibility set forth in subdivision (a) shall apply only if and after the creditor clearly and conspicuously in writing discloses that responsibility to that person.
SEC. 15.Section 1788.22 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.22.(a)In connection with any covered credit extended to a person under an account:
(1)No such person shall attempt to consummate any covered credit transaction thereunder knowing that credit privileges under the account have been terminated or suspended.
(2)Each such person shall notify the creditor by telephone, telegraph, letter, or any other reasonable means that an unauthorized use of the account has occurred or may occur as the result of loss or theft of a credit card, or other instrument identifying the account, within a reasonable time after that persons discovery thereof, and shall reasonably assist the creditor in determining the facts and circumstances relating to any unauthorized use of the account.
(b)Each responsibility set forth in subdivision (a) shall apply only if and after the creditor clearly and conspicuously in writing discloses that responsibility to that person.
SEC. 16.Section 100001 of the Financial Code is amended to read:100001.(a)No person shall engage in the business of debt collection in this state without first obtaining a license pursuant to this division. To the extent permitted by federal law, a person is acting in this state if the person is located in this state and is seeking to collect from a debtor that resides inside or outside the state, or is located outside of the state and is seeking to collect from a debtor that resides in this state. A license shall be obtained for the licensees principal place of business and shall not be transferred or assigned. A separate license is not required for each individual branch office.
(b)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), this division shall not apply to a depository institution, as defined in Section 1420, a person licensed pursuant to Division 9 (commencing with Section 22000) or Division 20 (commencing with Section 50000), a person licensed pursuant to Part 1 (commencing with Section 10000) of Division 4 of the Business and Professions Code, a person who is subject to the Karnette Rental-Purchase Act (Title 2.96 (commencing with Section 1812.620) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code), or a trustee performing acts in connection with a nonjudicial foreclosure pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 2920) of Chapter 2 of Title 14 of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code.
(2)The commissioner may use the authority described in Section 100005 in connection with a violation of Title 1.6C (commencing with Section 1788) or Title 1.6C.5 (commencing with Section 1788.50) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code by a person described in paragraph (1).
(c)This division shall not apply to debt collection regulated pursuant to Division 12.5 (commencing with Section 28100) or to the collection of covered commercial debt or covered commercial credit, as those terms are defined in Title 1.6C (commencing with Section 1788) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code.
SEC. 17.Section 7.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 1788.14 of the Civil Code proposed by both this bill and Senate Bill 1061. That section of this bill shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2025, (2) each bill amends Section 1788.14 of the Civil Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 1061, in which case Section 7 of this bill shall not become operative.
SEC. 17.SEC. 18.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
(a)The Legislature makes the following findings:
(1)The banking and credit system and grantors of credit to consumers are dependent upon the collection of just and owing debts. Unfair or deceptive collection practices undermine the public confidence, which is essential to the continued functioning of the banking and credit system and sound extensions of credit to consumers and small businesses.
(2)There is need to ensure that debt collectors and debtors exercise their responsibilities to one another with fairness, honesty and due regard for the rights of the other.
(b)It is the purpose of this title to prohibit debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of consumer debts and small business debts and to require debtors to act fairly in entering into and honoring those debts, as specified in this title.
(c)Nothing in this title is intended to create or impose an additional licensing requirement under Division 25 (commencing with Section 100000) of the Financial Code on a debt collector with respect to the collection of covered commercial debt or covered commercial credit.
SEC. 2.Section 1788.2 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.2.(a)Definitions and rules of construction set forth in this section are applicable for the purpose of this title.
(b)The term debt collection means any act or practice in connection with the collection of covered debts.
(c)The term debt collector means any person who, in the ordinary course of business, regularly, on behalf of that person or others, engages in debt collection. The term includes any person who composes and sells, or offers to compose and sell, forms, letters, and other collection media used or intended to be used for debt collection.
(d)The term debt means money, property, or their equivalent that is due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person to another person.
(e)The term consumer credit transaction means a transaction between a natural person and another person in which property, services, or money is acquired on credit by that natural person from the other person primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
(f)The terms consumer debt and consumer credit mean money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person by reason of a consumer credit transaction. The term consumer debt includes a mortgage debt.
(g)The term person means a natural person, partnership, corporation, limited liability company, trust, estate, cooperative, association, or other similar entity.
(h)(1) Except as provided in Section 1788.18, the term debtor means a natural person from whom a debt collector seeks to collect a covered debt that is due and owing or alleged to be due and owing from that person.
(2)In relation to a covered commercial debt, debt or covered commercial credit, a debtor includes shall mean a natural person who guarantees an obligation related to a covered commercial credit transaction.
(3)A debtor does not include a corporation or limited liability company.(i)The term creditor means a person who extends covered credit to a debtor.
(j)The term consumer credit report means any written, oral, or other communication of any information by a consumer reporting agency bearing on a consumers creditworthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living that is used or expected to be used or collected in whole or in part for the purpose of serving as a factor in establishing the consumers eligibility for (1) credit or insurance to be used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, or (2) employment purposes, or (3) other purposes authorized under any applicable federal or state law or regulation. The term does not include (a) any report containing information solely as to transactions or experiences between the consumer and the person making the report; (b) any authorization or approval of a specific extension of credit directly or indirectly by the issuer of a credit card or similar device; or (c) any report in which a person who has been requested by a third party to make a specific extension of credit directly or indirectly to a consumer conveys that persons decision with respect to that request, if the third party advises the consumer of the name and address of the person to whom the request was made, and the person makes the disclosures to the consumer required under any applicable federal or state law or regulation.
(k)The term consumer reporting agency means any person that, for monetary fees, dues, or on a cooperative nonprofit basis, regularly engages, in whole or in part, in the practice of assembling or evaluating consumer credit information or other information on consumers for the purpose of furnishing consumer credit reports to third parties and uses any means or facility for the purpose of preparing or furnishing consumer credit reports.
(l)The term covered debt means a consumer debt or a covered commercial debt.
(m)The term covered credit means consumer credit or covered commercial credit.
(n)The terms covered commercial debt and covered commercial credit mean money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person to a lender, a commercial financing provider, as defined in Section 22800 of the Financial Code, or a debt buyer, as defined in Section 1788.50, by reason of a covered commercial credit transaction.
(o)The term covered commercial credit transaction means a transaction between a person and another person in which property, services, or money, of a total value of no more than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000), is acquired on credit by that person from the other person for use primarily for other than personal, family, or household purposes.
SEC. 3.Section 1788.10 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.10.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following conduct:
(a)The use, or threat of use, of physical force or violence or any criminal means to cause harm to the person, or the reputation, or the property of any person.
(b)The threat that the failure to pay a covered debt will result in an accusation that the debtor has committed a crime where the accusation, if made, would be false.
(c)The communication of, or threat to communicate to any person the fact that a debtor has engaged in conduct, other than the failure to pay a covered debt, which the debt collector knows or has reason to believe will defame the debtor.
(d)The threat to the debtor to sell or assign to another person the obligation of the debtor to pay a covered debt, with an accompanying false representation that the result of the sale or assignment would be that the debtor would lose any defense to the covered debt.
(e)The threat to any person that nonpayment of the covered debt may result in the arrest of the debtor or the seizure, garnishment, attachment attachment, or sale of any property or the garnishment or attachment of wages of the debtor, unless the action is in fact contemplated by the debt collector and permitted by the law.
(f)The threat to take any action against the debtor, which is prohibited by this title.
SEC. 4.Section 1788.11 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.11.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Using obscene or profane language.
(b)Placing a telephone call without disclosing the callers identity, provided that an employee of a licensed collection agency may identify oneself by using their registered alias name if they correctly identify the agency that they represent. A debt collector shall provide its California debt collector license number, if applicable, upon the consumers request.
(c)Causing expense to any person for long distance telephone calls, telegram fees, or charges for other similar communications, by misrepresenting to the person the purpose of the telephone call, telegram or similar communication.
(d)Causing a telephone to ring repeatedly or continuously to annoy the person called.
(e)Communicating, by telephone or in person, with the debtor with such frequency as to be unreasonable, and to constitute harassment of the debtor under the circumstances.
(f)Sending written or digital communication to the person that does not display the California license number of the collector, if applicable, in at least 12-point type.
SEC. 5.Section 1788.12 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.12.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt or consumer debt, as specified, by means of the following practices:
(a)Communicating with the debtors employer regarding the debtors consumer debt unless such a communication is necessary to the collection of the consumer debt, or unless the debtor or their attorney has consented in writing to that communication. A communication is necessary to the collection of the consumer debt only if it is made for the purposes of verifying the debtors employment, locating the debtor, or effecting garnishment, after judgment, of the debtors wages, or in the case of a medical debt for the purpose of discovering the existence of medical insurance. Any such communication, other than a communication in the case of a medical debt by a health care provider or its agent for the purpose of discovering the existence of medical insurance, shall be in writing unless that written communication receives no response within 15 days and shall be made only as many times as is necessary to the collection of the consumer debt. Communications to a debtors employer regarding a consumer debt shall not contain language that would be improper if the communication were made to the debtor. One communication solely for the purpose of verifying the debtors employment may be oral without prior written contact.
(b)Communicating information regarding a covered consumer debt to any member of the debtors family, other than the debtors spouse or the parents or guardians of the debtor who is either a minor or who resides in the same household with that parent or guardian, prior to obtaining a judgment against the debtor, except where the purpose of the communication is to locate the debtor, or where the debtor or their attorney has consented in writing to that communication.
(c)Communicating to any person any list of debtors that discloses the nature or existence of a covered debt, commonly known as deadbeat lists, lists, or advertising any covered debt for sale, by naming the debtor.
(d)Communicating with the debtor by means of a written communication that displays or conveys any information about the covered debt or the debtor other than the name, address address, and telephone number of the debtor and the debt collector and that is intended both to be seen by any other person and also to embarrass the debtor.
(e)Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this section, the disclosure, publication publication, or communication by a debt collector of information relating to a covered debt or the debtor to a consumer reporting agency or to any other person reasonably believed to have a legitimate business need for that information shall not be deemed to violate this title.
SEC. 6.Section 1788.13 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.13.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Any communication with the debtor other than in the name either of the debt collector or the person on whose behalf the debt collector is acting.
(b)Any false representation that any person is an attorney or counselor at law.
(c)Any communication with a debtor in the name of an attorney or counselor at law or upon stationery or like written instruments bearing the name of the attorney or counselor at law, unless that communication is by an attorney or counselor at law or shall have been approved or authorized by that attorney or counselor at law.
(d)The representation that any debt collector is vouched for, bonded by, affiliated with, or is an instrumentality, agent or official of any federal, state or local government or any agency of federal, state or local government, unless the collector is actually employed by the particular governmental agency in question and is acting on behalf of that agency in the debt collection matter.
(e)The false representation that the covered debt may be increased by the addition of attorneys fees, investigation fees, service fees, finance charges, or other charges if, in fact, those fees or charges may not legally be added to the existing obligation.
(f)The false representation that information concerning a debtors failure or alleged failure to pay a covered debt has been or is about to be referred to a consumer reporting agency.
(g)The false representation that a debt collector is a consumer reporting agency.
(h)The false representation that collection letters, notices or other printed forms are being sent by or on behalf of a claim, credit, audit, or legal department.
(i)The false representation of the true nature of the business or services being rendered by the debt collector.
(j)The false representation that a legal proceeding has been, is about to be, or will be instituted unless payment of a covered debt is made.
(k)The false representation that a covered debt has been, is about to be, or will be sold, assigned, or referred to a debt collector for collection.
(l)Any communication by a licensed collection agency to a debtor demanding money unless the claim is actually assigned to the collection agency.
SEC. 7.Section 1788.14 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.14.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Obtaining an affirmation from a debtor of a covered debt that has been discharged in bankruptcy, without clearly and conspicuously disclosing to the debtor, in writing, at the time the affirmation is sought, the fact that the debtor is not legally obligated to make an affirmation.
(b)Collecting or attempting to collect from the debtor the whole or any part of the debt collectors fee or charge for services rendered, or other expense incurred by the debt collector in the collection of the covered debt, except as permitted by law.
(c)Initiating communications, other than statements of account, with the debtor with regard to the covered debt, when the debt collector has been previously notified in writing by the debtors attorney that the debtor is represented by the attorney with respect to the covered debt and the notice includes the attorneys name and address and a request by the attorney that all communications regarding the covered debt be addressed to the attorney, unless the attorney fails to answer correspondence, return telephone calls, or discuss the obligation in question. This subdivision shall not apply if prior approval has been obtained from the debtors attorney, or if the communication is a response in the ordinary course of business to a debtors inquiry.
(d)Sending a written communication to a debtor in an attempt to collect a time-barred debt without providing the debtor with one of the following written notices:
(1)If the debt is not past the date for obsolescence set forth in Section 605(a) of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681c), the following notice shall be included in the first written communication provided to the debtor after the debt has become time-barred:
The law limits how long you can be sued on a debt. Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it. If you do not pay the debt, [insert name of debt collector] may [continue to] report it to the credit reporting agencies as unpaid for as long as the law permits this reporting.
(2)If the debt is past the date for obsolescence set forth in Section 605(a) of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681c), the following notice shall be included in the first written communication provided to the debtor after the date for obsolescence:
The law limits how long you can be sued on a debt. Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it, and we will not report it to any credit reporting agency.
(e)Collecting consumer debt that originated with a hospital licensed pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code without including in the first written communication to the debtor a copy of the notice required pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 127425 of the Health and Safety Code and a statement that the debt collector will wait at least 180 days from the date the debtor was initially billed for the hospital services that are the basis of the debt before reporting adverse information to a credit reporting agency or filing a lawsuit against the debtor.
(f)For purposes of this section, first written communication means the first communication sent to the debtor in writing or by facsimile, email, or other similar means.
SEC. 8.Section 1788.14.5 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.14.5.(a)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall provide to the debtor, upon the debtors written request, a statement that includes all of the following information pursuant to subdivision (c):
(1)That the debt collector has authority to assert the rights of the creditor to collect the debt.
(2)(A)The debt balance and an explanation of the amount, nature, and reason for all interest and fees, if any, imposed by the creditor or any subsequent entities to which the debt was assigned.
(B)The explanation required by subparagraph (A) shall identify separately the balance, the total of any interest, and the total of any fees.
(3)The date the debt became delinquent or the date of the last payment.
(4)The name and an address of the creditor and the creditors account number associated with the debt. The creditors name and address shall be in sufficient form so as to reasonably identify the creditor.
(5)The name and last known address of the debtor as they appeared in the creditors records before the assignment of the debt to the debt collector.
(6)The names and addresses of all persons or entities other than the debt collector to which the debt was assigned. The names and addresses shall be in sufficient form so as to reasonably identify each assignee.
(7)The California license number of the debt collector, if applicable.
(b)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall not make a written statement to a debtor in an attempt to collect a delinquent debt unless the debt collector has access to a copy of a contract or other document evidencing the debtors agreement to the debt, except in the following circumstances:
(1)If the claim is based on debt for which no signed contract or agreement exists, the debt collector shall have access to a copy of a document provided to the debtor while the account was active, demonstrating that the debt was incurred by the debtor.
(2)For a revolving credit account, the most recent monthly statement recording a purchase transaction, last payment, or balance transfer shall be deemed sufficient to satisfy the requirements of this subparagraph.
(c)(1)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall provide the information or documents identified in subdivisions (a) and (b) to the debtor without charge within 30 calendar days of receipt of a debtors written request for information regarding the debt or proof of the debt.
(2)If the debt collector cannot provide the information or documents within 30 calendar days, the debt collector shall cease all collection of the debt until the debt collector provides the debtor the information or documents described in subdivisions (a) and (b).
(d)(1)A debt collector shall provide a debtor with whom it has contact an active postal address to which a debtor may send a request for the information described in this section.
(2)A debt collector may also provide an active email address to which these requests can be sent and through which information and documents can be delivered if the parties agree.
(e)(1)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall include in its first written communication with the debtor in no smaller than 12-point type, a separate prominent notice that contains the following statement:
You may request records showing the following: (1) that [insert name of debt collector] has the right to seek collection of the debt; (2) the debt balance, including an explanation of any interest charges and additional fees; (3) the date the debt became delinquent or the date of the last payment; (4) the name of the creditor and the account number associated with the debt; (5) the name and last known address of the debtor as it appeared in the creditors records prior to assignment of the debt; and (6) the names of all persons or entities other than the debt collector to which the debt has been assigned, if applicable. You may also request from us a copy of the contract or other document evidencing your agreement to the debt.
A request for these records may be addressed to: [insert debt collectors active mailing address and email address, if applicable].
(2)If a language other than English is principally used by the debt collector in the initial oral contact with the debtor, the notice required by this subdivision shall be provided to the debtor in that language within five business days.
(f)(1)A debt buyer that complies with the requirements of Section 1788.52 shall be deemed to be in compliance with this section.
(2)For purposes of this subdivision, debt buyer shall have the same meaning as in Section 1788.50.
(g)For the purposes of this section, the term delinquent debt means a covered debt, other than a mortgage debt, that is past due at least 90 days and has not been charged off.
(h)This section shall apply to all delinquent consumer debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2022.
(i)This section shall apply to all delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
SEC. 9.Section 1788.15 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.15.(a)No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of judicial proceedings when the debt collector knows that service of process, where essential to jurisdiction over the debtor or their property, has not been legally effected.
(b)No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt, other than one reduced to judgment, by means of judicial proceedings in a county other than the county in which the debtor has incurred the covered debt or the county in which the debtor resides at the time those proceedings are instituted, or resided at the time the debt was incurred.
(c)Notwithstanding subdivision (b), when the obligation of the debtor arises from a guaranty by the debtor of a covered commercial debt, a debt collector may collect or attempt to collect covered commercial debt by means of a judicial proceeding in the county in which the non-natural person for whose purpose the commercial debt was incurred is located.
(d)This section shall apply to all delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
SEC. 10.Section 1788.16 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.16.It is unlawful, with respect to attempted collection of a covered debt, for a debt collector, creditor, or an attorney to send a communication that simulates legal or judicial process or that gives the appearance of being authorized, issued, or approved by a governmental agency or attorney when it is not. Any violation of the provisions of this section is a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) or by both.
SEC. 11.Section 1788.17 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.17.Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, every debt collector collecting or attempting to collect a consumer debt shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1692b to 1692j, inclusive, of, and shall be subject to the remedies in Section 1692k of, Title 15 of the United States Code. However, subsection (11) of Section 1692e and Section 1692g shall not apply to any person specified in paragraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (6) of Section 1692a of Title 15 of the United States Code or that persons principal. The references to federal codes in this section refer to those codes as they read January 1, 2001.
SEC. 12.Section 1788.18 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.18.(a)Upon receipt from a debtor of all of the following, a debt collector shall cease collection activities until completion of the review provided in subdivision (d):
(1)A copy of a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) identity theft report, completed and signed by the debtor. The debtor may choose, instead, to send a copy of a police report filed by the debtor alleging that the debtor is the victim of an identity theft crime, including, but not limited to, a violation of Section 530.5 of the Penal Code, for the specific debt being collected by the debt collector; however, the debt collector shall not also require a police report if the debtor submits an FTC identity theft report.
(2)The debtors written statement that the debtor claims to be the victim of identity theft with respect to the specific debt being collected by the debt collector.
(b)The written statement described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) shall consist of either of the following:
(1)A written statement that contains the content of the Identity Theft Victims Fraudulent Account Information Request offered to the public by the California Privacy Protection Agency. Office of Privacy Protection.
(2)A written statement that certifies that the representations are true, correct, and contain no material omissions of fact to the best knowledge and belief of the person submitting the certification. A person submitting the certification who declares as true any material matter pursuant to this subdivision that they know to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor. The statement shall contain or be accompanied by the following, to the extent that an item listed below is relevant to the debtors allegation of identity theft with respect to the debt in question:
(A)A statement that the debtor is a victim of identity theft.
(B)A copy of the debtors drivers license or identification card, as issued by the state.
(C)Any other identification document that supports the statement of identity theft.
(D)Specific facts supporting the claim of identity theft, if available.
(E)Any explanation showing that the debtor did not incur the debt.
(F)Any available correspondence disputing the debt after transaction information has been provided to the debtor.
(G)Documentation of the residence of the debtor at the time of the alleged debt. This may include copies of bills and statements, such as utility bills, tax statements, or other statements from businesses sent to the debtor, showing that the debtor lived at another residence at the time the debt was incurred.
(H)A telephone number for contacting the debtor concerning any additional information or questions, or direction that further communications to the debtor be in writing only, with the mailing address specified in the statement.
(I)To the extent the debtor has information concerning who may have incurred the debt, the identification of any person whom the debtor believes is responsible.
(J)An express statement that the debtor did not authorize the use of the debtors name or personal information for incurring the debt.
(K)The certification required pursuant to this paragraph shall be sufficient if it is in substantially the following form:
I certify the representations made are true, correct, and | |
(Date and Place)(Signature) |
(c)If a debtor notifies a debt collector orally that they are a victim of identity theft, the debt collector shall notify the debtor, orally or in writing, that the debtors claim must be in writing. If a debtor notifies a debt collector in writing that they are a victim of identity theft, but omits information required pursuant to subdivision (a) or, if applicable, the certification required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), if the debt collector does not cease collection activities, the debt collector shall provide written notice to the debtor of the additional information that is required, or the certification required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), as applicable, or send the debtor a copy of the Federal Trade Commissions identity theft form.
(d)Within 10 business days of receiving the complete statement and information described in subdivision (a), the debt collector shall, if it furnished adverse information about the debtor to a consumer credit reporting agency, notify the consumer credit reporting agency that the account is disputed, and initiate a review considering all of the information provided by the debtor and other information available to the debt collector in its file or from the creditor. The debt collector shall send notice of its determination to the debtor no later than 10 business days after concluding the review. The debt collector may recommence debt collection activities only upon making a good faith determination that the information does not establish that the debtor is not responsible for the specific debt in question. The debt collectors determination shall be made in a manner consistent with the provisions of subsection (1) of Section 1692f of Title 15 of the United States Code, as incorporated by Section 1788.17 of this code. The debt collector shall notify the debtor in writing of that determination and the basis for that determination before proceeding with any further collection activities. The debt collectors determination shall be based on all of the information provided by the debtor and other information available to the debt collector in its file or from the creditor.
(e)No inference or presumption that the debt is valid or invalid, or that the debtor is liable or not liable for the debt, shall arise if the debt collector decides after the review described in subdivision (d) to cease or recommence the debt collection activities. The exercise or nonexercise of rights under this section is not a waiver of any other right or defense of the debtor or debt collector.
(f)The statement and supporting documents that comply with subdivision (a) may also satisfy, to the extent those documents meet the requirements of, the notice requirement of paragraph (5) of subdivision (c) of Section 1798.93.
(g)A debt collector who ceases collection activities under this section and does not recommence those collection activities shall do both of the following:
(1)If the debt collector has furnished adverse information to a consumer credit reporting agency, notify the agency to delete that information no later than 10 business days after making its determination.
(2)Notify the creditor no later than 10 business days after making its determination that debt collection activities have been terminated based upon the debtors claim of identity theft.
(h)A debt collector who has possession of documents that the debtor is entitled to request from a creditor pursuant to Section 530.8 of the Penal Code is authorized to provide those documents to the debtor.
(i)Notwithstanding subdivision (h) of Section 1788.2, for the purposes of this section, debtor means a natural person, firm, association, organization, partnership, business trust, company, corporation, or limited liability company from which a debt collector seeks to collect a debt that is due and owing or alleged to be due and owing from the person or entity. The remedies provided by this title shall apply equally to violations of this section.
SEC. 13.Section 1788.20 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.20.In connection with any request or application for covered credit, no person shall:
(a)Request or apply for that credit at a time when that person knows there is no reasonable probability of that persons being able, or that person then lacks the intention, to pay the obligation created thereby in accordance with the terms and conditions of the credit extension.
(b)Knowingly submit false or inaccurate information or willfully conceal adverse information bearing upon that persons credit worthiness, credit standing, or credit capacity.
SEC. 14.Section 1788.21 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.21.(a)In connection with any covered credit existing or requested to be extended to a person, that person shall within a reasonable time notify the creditor or prospective creditor of any change in that persons name, address, or employment.
(b)Each responsibility set forth in subdivision (a) shall apply only if and after the creditor clearly and conspicuously in writing discloses that responsibility to that person.
SEC. 15.Section 1788.22 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.22.(a)In connection with any covered credit extended to a person under an account:
(1)No such person shall attempt to consummate any consumer covered credit transaction or small business credit transaction thereunder knowing that credit privileges under the account have been terminated or suspended.
(2)Each such person shall notify the creditor by telephone, telegraph, letter, or any other reasonable means that an unauthorized use of the account has occurred or may occur as the result of loss or theft of a credit card, or other instrument identifying the account, within a reasonable time after that persons discovery thereof, and shall reasonably assist the creditor in determining the facts and circumstances relating to any unauthorized use of the account.
(b)Each responsibility set forth in subdivision (a) shall apply only if and after the creditor clearly and conspicuously in writing discloses that responsibility to that person.
SEC. 16.Section 100001 of the Financial Code is amended to read:100001.(a)No person shall engage in the business of debt collection in this state without first obtaining a license pursuant to this division. To the extent permitted by federal law, a person is acting in this state if the person is located in this state and is seeking to collect from a debtor that resides inside or outside the state, or is located outside of the state and is seeking to collect from a debtor that resides in this state. A license shall be obtained for the licensees principal place of business and shall not be transferred or assigned. A separate license is not required for each individual branch office.
(b)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), this division shall not apply to a depository institution, as defined in Section 1420, a person licensed pursuant to Division 9 (commencing with Section 22000) or Division 20 (commencing with Section 50000), a person licensed pursuant to Part 1 (commencing with Section 10000) of Division 4 of the Business and Professions Code, a person who is subject to the Karnette Rental-Purchase Act (Title 2.96 (commencing with Section 1812.620) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code), or a trustee performing acts in connection with a nonjudicial foreclosure pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 2920) of Chapter 2 of Title 14 of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code.
(2)The commissioner may use the authority described in Section 100005 in connection with a violation of Title 1.6C (commencing with Section 1788) or Title 1.6C.5 (commencing with Section 1788.50) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code by a person described in paragraph (1).
(c)This division shall not apply to debt collection regulated pursuant to Division 12.5 (commencing with Section 28100). 28100) or to the collection of covered commercial debt or covered commercial credit, as those terms are defined in Title 1.6C (commencing with Section 1788) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code.
SEC. 16.SEC. 17.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
(a)The Legislature makes the following findings:
(1)The banking and credit system and grantors of credit to consumers are dependent upon the collection of just and owing debts. Unfair or deceptive collection practices undermine the public confidence, which is essential to the continued functioning of the banking and credit system and sound extensions of credit to consumers and small businesses.
(2)There is need to ensure that debt collectors and debtors exercise their responsibilities to one another with fairness, honesty and due regard for the rights of the other.
(b)It is the purpose of this title to prohibit debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of consumer debts and small business debts and to require debtors to act fairly in entering into and honoring those debts, as specified in this title.
SEC. 2.Section 1788.2 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.2.(a)Definitions and rules of construction set forth in this section are applicable for the purpose of this title.
(b)The term debt collection means any act or practice in connection with the collection of covered debts.
(c)The term debt collector means any person who, in the ordinary course of business, regularly, on behalf of that person or others, engages in debt collection. The term includes any person who composes and sells, or offers to compose and sell, forms, letters, and other collection media used or intended to be used for debt collection.
(d)The term debt means money, property, or their equivalent that is due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person to another person.
(e)The term consumer credit transaction means a transaction between a natural person and another person in which property, services, or money is acquired on credit by that natural person from the other person primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
(f)The terms consumer debt and consumer credit mean money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person by reason of a consumer credit transaction. The term consumer debt includes a mortgage debt.
(g)The term person means a natural person, partnership, corporation, limited liability company, trust, estate, cooperative, association, or other similar entity.
(h)The (1) Except as provided in Section 1788.18, the term debtor means a natural person from whom a debt collector seeks to collect a covered debt that is due and owing or alleged to be due and owing from that person.
(2)In relation to a covered commercial debt, a debtor includes a natural person who guarantees an obligation related to a covered commercial credit transaction.
(3)A debtor does not include a corporation or limited liability company.
(i)The term creditor means a person who extends covered credit to a debtor.
(j)The term consumer credit report means any written, oral, or other communication of any information by a consumer reporting agency bearing on a consumers creditworthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living that is used or expected to be used or collected in whole or in part for the purpose of serving as a factor in establishing the consumers eligibility for (1) credit or insurance to be used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, or (2) employment purposes, or (3) other purposes authorized under any applicable federal or state law or regulation. The term does not include (a) any report containing information solely as to transactions or experiences between the consumer and the person making the report; (b) any authorization or approval of a specific extension of credit directly or indirectly by the issuer of a credit card or similar device; or (c) any report in which a person who has been requested by a third party to make a specific extension of credit directly or indirectly to a consumer conveys that persons decision with respect to that request, if the third party advises the consumer of the name and address of the person to whom the request was made, and the person makes the disclosures to the consumer required under any applicable federal or state law or regulation.
(k)The term consumer reporting agency means any person that, for monetary fees, dues, or on a cooperative nonprofit basis, regularly engages, in whole or in part, in the practice of assembling or evaluating consumer credit information or other information on consumers for the purpose of furnishing consumer credit reports to third parties and uses any means or facility for the purpose of preparing or furnishing consumer credit reports.
(l)The term covered debt means a consumer debt or a small business covered commercial debt.
(m)The term covered credit means consumer credit or small business covered commercial credit.
(n)The term small business means an independently owned and operated business that is not dominant in its field of operation and meets all of the following criteria:(1)The principal office of the business is located in California.(2)The officers of the business are domiciled in California.(3)The business, together with its affiliates, has 100 or fewer employees.(4)The business had average annual gross receipts of fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000) or less over the previous three years. (o)(n)The terms small business covered commercial debt and small business covered commercial credit mean money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person to a lender, a commercial financing provider, as defined in Section 22800 of the Financial Code, or a debt buyer, as defined in Section 1788.50, by reason of a small business covered commercial credit transaction.
(p)(o)The term small business covered commercial credit transaction means a transaction between a small business or small business owner person and another person in which property, services, or money money, of a total value of no more than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000), is acquired on credit by that small business or small business owner person from the other person primarily for purposes related to the activities of the small business. for use primarily for other than personal, family, or household purposes.
SEC. 3.Section 1788.10 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.10.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following conduct:
(a)The use, or threat of use, of physical force or violence or any criminal means to cause harm to the person, or the reputation, or the property of any person.
(b)The threat that the failure to pay a covered debt will result in an accusation that the debtor has committed a crime where the accusation, if made, would be false.
(c)The communication of, or threat to communicate to any person the fact that a debtor has engaged in conduct, other than the failure to pay a covered debt, which the debt collector knows or has reason to believe will defame the debtor.
(d)The threat to the debtor to sell or assign to another person the obligation of the debtor to pay a covered debt, with an accompanying false representation that the result of the sale or assignment would be that the debtor would lose any defense to the covered debt.
(e)The threat to any person that nonpayment of the covered debt may result in the arrest of the debtor or the seizure, garnishment, attachment or sale of any property or the garnishment or attachment of wages of the debtor, unless the action is in fact contemplated by the debt collector and permitted by the law.
(f)The threat to take any action against the debtor, which is prohibited by this title.
SEC. 4.Section 1788.11 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.11.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Using obscene or profane language.
(b)Placing a telephone call without disclosing the callers identity, provided that an employee of a licensed collection agency may identify oneself by using their registered alias name if they correctly identify the agency that they represent. A debt collector shall provide its California debt collector license number number, if applicable, upon the consumers request.
(c)Causing expense to any person for long distance telephone calls, telegram fees, or charges for other similar communications, by misrepresenting to the person the purpose of the telephone call, telegram or similar communication.
(d)Causing a telephone to ring repeatedly or continuously to annoy the person called.
(e)Communicating, by telephone or in person, with the debtor with such frequency as to be unreasonable, and to constitute harassment of the debtor under the circumstances.
(f)Sending written or digital communication to the person that does not display the California license number of the collector collector, if applicable, in at least 12-point type.
SEC. 5.Section 1788.12 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.12.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Communicating with the debtors employer regarding the debtors covered consumer debt unless such a communication is necessary to the collection of the consumer debt, or unless the debtor or their attorney has consented in writing to that communication. A communication is necessary to the collection of the consumer debt only if it is made for the purposes of verifying the debtors employment, locating the debtor, or effecting garnishment, after judgment, of the debtors wages, or in the case of a medical debt for the purpose of discovering the existence of medical insurance. Any such communication, other than a communication in the case of a medical debt by a health care provider or its agent for the purpose of discovering the existence of medical insurance, shall be in writing unless that written communication receives no response within 15 days and shall be made only as many times as is necessary to the collection of the consumer debt. Communications to a debtors employer regarding a consumer debt shall not contain language that would be improper if the communication were made to the debtor. One communication solely for the purpose of verifying the debtors employment may be oral without prior written contact.
(b)Communicating information regarding a covered debt to any member of the debtors family, other than the debtors spouse or the parents or guardians of the debtor who is either a minor or who resides in the same household with that parent or guardian, prior to obtaining a judgment against the debtor, except where the purpose of the communication is to locate the debtor, or where the debtor or their attorney has consented in writing to that communication.
(c)Communicating to any person any list of debtors that discloses the nature or existence of a covered debt, commonly known as deadbeat lists, or advertising any covered debt for sale, by naming the debtor.
(d)Communicating with the debtor by means of a written communication that displays or conveys any information about the covered debt or the debtor other than the name, address and telephone number of the debtor and the debt collector and that is intended both to be seen by any other person and also to embarrass the debtor.
(e)Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this section, the disclosure, publication or communication by a debt collector of information relating to a covered debt or the debtor to a consumer reporting agency or to any other person reasonably believed to have a legitimate business need for that information shall not be deemed to violate this title.
SEC. 6.Section 1788.13 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.13.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Any communication with the debtor other than in the name either of the debt collector or the person on whose behalf the debt collector is acting.
(b)Any false representation that any person is an attorney or counselor at law.
(c)Any communication with a debtor in the name of an attorney or counselor at law or upon stationery or like written instruments bearing the name of the attorney or counselor at law, unless that communication is by an attorney or counselor at law or shall have been approved or authorized by that attorney or counselor at law.
(d)The representation that any debt collector is vouched for, bonded by, affiliated with, or is an instrumentality, agent or official of any federal, state or local government or any agency of federal, state or local government, unless the collector is actually employed by the particular governmental agency in question and is acting on behalf of that agency in the debt collection matter.
(e)The false representation that the covered debt may be increased by the addition of attorneys fees, investigation fees, service fees, finance charges, or other charges if, in fact, those fees or charges may not legally be added to the existing obligation.
(f)The false representation that information concerning a debtors failure or alleged failure to pay a covered debt has been or is about to be referred to a consumer reporting agency.
(g)The false representation that a debt collector is a consumer reporting agency.
(h)The false representation that collection letters, notices or other printed forms are being sent by or on behalf of a claim, credit, audit, or legal department.
(i)The false representation of the true nature of the business or services being rendered by the debt collector.
(j)The false representation that a legal proceeding has been, is about to be, or will be instituted unless payment of a covered debt is made.
(k)The false representation that a covered debt has been, is about to be, or will be sold, assigned, or referred to a debt collector for collection.
(l)Any communication by a licensed collection agency to a debtor demanding money unless the claim is actually assigned to the collection agency.
SEC. 7.Section 1788.14 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.14.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Obtaining an affirmation from a debtor of a covered debt that has been discharged in bankruptcy, without clearly and conspicuously disclosing to the debtor, in writing, at the time the affirmation is sought, the fact that the debtor is not legally obligated to make an affirmation.
(b)Collecting or attempting to collect from the debtor the whole or any part of the debt collectors fee or charge for services rendered, or other expense incurred by the debt collector in the collection of the covered debt, except as permitted by law.
(c)Initiating communications, other than statements of account, with the debtor with regard to the covered debt, when the debt collector has been previously notified in writing by the debtors attorney that the debtor is represented by the attorney with respect to the covered debt and the notice includes the attorneys name and address and a request by the attorney that all communications regarding the covered debt be addressed to the attorney, unless the attorney fails to answer correspondence, return telephone calls, or discuss the obligation in question. This subdivision shall not apply if prior approval has been obtained from the debtors attorney, or if the communication is a response in the ordinary course of business to a debtors inquiry.
(d)Sending a written communication to a debtor in an attempt to collect a time-barred debt without providing the debtor with one of the following written notices:
(1)If the debt is not past the date for obsolescence set forth in Section 605(a) of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681c), the following notice shall be included in the first written communication provided to the debtor after the debt has become time-barred:
The law limits how long you can be sued on a debt. Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it. If you do not pay the debt, [insert name of debt collector] may [continue to] report it to the credit reporting agencies as unpaid for as long as the law permits this reporting.
(2)If the debt is past the date for obsolescence set forth in Section 605(a) of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681c), the following notice shall be included in the first written communication provided to the debtor after the date for obsolescence:
The law limits how long you can be sued on a debt. Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it, and we will not report it to any credit reporting agency.
(e)Collecting consumer debt that originated with a hospital licensed pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code without including in the first written communication to the debtor a copy of the notice required pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 127425 of the Health and Safety Code and a statement that the debt collector will wait at least 180 days from the date the debtor was initially billed for the hospital services that are the basis of the debt before reporting adverse information to a credit reporting agency or filing a lawsuit against the debtor.
(f)For purposes of this section, first written communication means the first communication sent to the debtor in writing or by facsimile, email, or other similar means.
SEC. 8.Section 1788.14.5 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.14.5.(a)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall provide to the debtor, upon the debtors written request, a statement that includes all of the following information pursuant to subdivision (c):
(1)That the debt collector has authority to assert the rights of the creditor to collect the debt.
(2)(A)The debt balance and an explanation of the amount, nature, and reason for all interest and fees, if any, imposed by the creditor or any subsequent entities to which the debt was assigned.
(B)The explanation required by subparagraph (A) shall identify separately the balance, the total of any interest, and the total of any fees.
(3)The date the debt became delinquent or the date of the last payment.
(4)The name and an address of the creditor and the creditors account number associated with the debt. The creditors name and address shall be in sufficient form so as to reasonably identify the creditor.
(5)The name and last known address of the debtor as they appeared in the creditors records before the assignment of the debt to the debt collector.
(6)The names and addresses of all persons or entities other than the debt collector to which the debt was assigned. The names and addresses shall be in sufficient form so as to reasonably identify each assignee.
(7)The California license number of the debt collector. collector, if applicable.
(b)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall not make a written statement to a debtor in an attempt to collect a delinquent debt unless the debt collector has access to a copy of a contract or other document evidencing the debtors agreement to the debt, except in the following circumstances:
(1)If the claim is based on debt for which no signed contract or agreement exists, the debt collector shall have access to a copy of a document provided to the debtor while the account was active, demonstrating that the debt was incurred by the debtor.
(2)For a revolving credit account, the most recent monthly statement recording a purchase transaction, last payment, or balance transfer shall be deemed sufficient to satisfy the requirements of this subparagraph.
(c)(1)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall provide the information or documents identified in subdivisions (a) and (b) to the debtor without charge within 30 calendar days of receipt of a debtors written request for information regarding the debt or proof of the debt.
(2)If the debt collector cannot provide the information or documents within 30 calendar days, the debt collector shall cease all collection of the debt until the debt collector provides the debtor the information or documents described in subdivisions (a) and (b).
(d)(1)A debt collector shall provide a debtor with whom it has contact an active postal address to which a debtor may send a request for the information described in this section.
(2)A debt collector may also provide an active email address to which these requests can be sent and through which information and documents can be delivered if the parties agree.
(e)(1)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall include in its first written communication with the debtor in no smaller than 12-point type, a separate prominent notice that contains the following statement:
You may request records showing the following: (1) that [insert name of debt collector] has the right to seek collection of the debt; (2) the debt balance, including an explanation of any interest charges and additional fees; (3) the date the debt became delinquent or the date of the last payment; (4) the name of the creditor and the account number associated with the debt; (5) the name and last known address of the debtor as it appeared in the creditors records prior to assignment of the debt; and (6) the names of all persons or entities other than the debt collector to which the debt has been assigned, if applicable. You may also request from us a copy of the contract or other document evidencing your agreement to the debt.
A request for these records may be addressed to: [insert debt collectors active mailing address and email address, if applicable].
(2)If a language other than English is principally used by the debt collector in the initial oral contact with the debtor, the notice required by this subdivision shall be provided to the debtor in that language within five business days.
(f)(1)A debt buyer that complies with the requirements of Section 1788.52 shall be deemed to be in compliance with this section.
(2)For purposes of this subdivision, debt buyer shall have the same meaning as in Section 1788.50.
(g)For the purposes of this section, the term delinquent debt means a covered debt, other than a mortgage debt, that is past due at least 90 days and has not been charged off.
(h)This section shall apply to all delinquent consumer debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2022.
(i)This section shall become operative on July 1, 2022. apply to all delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
SEC. 9.Section 1788.15 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.15.(a)No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt by means of judicial proceedings when the debt collector knows that service of process, where essential to jurisdiction over the debtor or their property, has not been legally effected.
(b)No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a covered debt, other than one reduced to judgment, by means of judicial proceedings in a county other than the county in which the debtor has incurred the covered debt or the county in which the debtor resides at the time those proceedings are instituted, or resided at the time the debt was incurred.
SEC. 10.Section 1788.16 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.16.It is unlawful, with respect to attempted collection of a covered debt, for a debt collector, creditor, or an attorney to send a communication that simulates legal or judicial process or that gives the appearance of being authorized, issued, or approved by a governmental agency or attorney when it is not. Any violation of the provisions of this section is a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) or by both.
SEC. 11.Section 1788.17 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.17.Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, every debt collector collecting or attempting to collect a covered consumer debt shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1692b to 1692j, inclusive, of, and shall be subject to the remedies in Section 1692k of, Title 15 of the United States Code. However, subsection (11) of Section 1692e and Section 1692g shall not apply to any person specified in paragraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (6) of Section 1692a of Title 15 of the United States Code or that persons principal. The references to federal codes in this section refer to those codes as they read January 1, 2001.
SEC. 12.Section 1788.18 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.18.(a)Upon receipt from a debtor of all of the following, a debt collector shall cease collection activities until completion of the review provided in subdivision (d):
(1)A copy of a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) identity theft report, completed and signed by the debtor. The debtor may choose, instead, to send a copy of a police report filed by the debtor alleging that the debtor is the victim of an identity theft crime, including, but not limited to, a violation of Section 530.5 of the Penal Code, for the specific debt being collected by the debt collector; however, the debt collector shall not also require a police report if the debtor submits an FTC identity theft report.
(2)The debtors written statement that the debtor claims to be the victim of identity theft with respect to the specific debt being collected by the debt collector.
(b)The written statement described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) shall consist of either of the following:
(1)A written statement that contains the content of the Identity Theft Victims Fraudulent Account Information Request offered to the public by the California Office of Privacy Protection. Privacy Protection Agency.
(2)A written statement that certifies that the representations are true, correct, and contain no material omissions of fact to the best knowledge and belief of the person submitting the certification. A person submitting the certification who declares as true any material matter pursuant to this subdivision that they know to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor. The statement shall contain or be accompanied by the following, to the extent that an item listed below is relevant to the debtors allegation of identity theft with respect to the debt in question:
(A)A statement that the debtor is a victim of identity theft.
(B)A copy of the debtors drivers license or identification card, as issued by the state.
(C)Any other identification document that supports the statement of identity theft.
(D)Specific facts supporting the claim of identity theft, if available.
(E)Any explanation showing that the debtor did not incur the debt.
(F)Any available correspondence disputing the debt after transaction information has been provided to the debtor.
(G)Documentation of the residence of the debtor at the time of the alleged debt. This may include copies of bills and statements, such as utility bills, tax statements, or other statements from businesses sent to the debtor, showing that the debtor lived at another residence at the time the debt was incurred.
(H)A telephone number for contacting the debtor concerning any additional information or questions, or direction that further communications to the debtor be in writing only, with the mailing address specified in the statement.
(I)To the extent the debtor has information concerning who may have incurred the debt, the identification of any person whom the debtor believes is responsible.
(J)An express statement that the debtor did not authorize the use of the debtors name or personal information for incurring the debt.
(K)The certification required pursuant to this paragraph shall be sufficient if it is in substantially the following form:
I certify the representations made are true, correct, and | |
(Date and Place)(Signature) |
(c)If a debtor notifies a debt collector orally that they are a victim of identity theft, the debt collector shall notify the debtor, orally or in writing, that the debtors claim must be in writing. If a debtor notifies a debt collector in writing that they are a victim of identity theft, but omits information required pursuant to subdivision (a) or, if applicable, the certification required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), if the debt collector does not cease collection activities, the debt collector shall provide written notice to the debtor of the additional information that is required, or the certification required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), as applicable, or send the debtor a copy of the Federal Trade Commissions identity theft form.
(d)Within 10 business days of receiving the complete statement and information described in subdivision (a), the debt collector shall, if it furnished adverse information about the debtor to a consumer credit reporting agency, notify the consumer credit reporting agency that the account is disputed, and initiate a review considering all of the information provided by the debtor and other information available to the debt collector in its file or from the creditor. The debt collector shall send notice of its determination to the debtor no later than 10 business days after concluding the review. The debt collector may recommence debt collection activities only upon making a good faith determination that the information does not establish that the debtor is not responsible for the specific debt in question. The debt collectors determination shall be made in a manner consistent with the provisions of subsection (1) of Section 1692f of Title 15 of the United States Code, as incorporated by Section 1788.17 of this code. The debt collector shall notify the debtor in writing of that determination and the basis for that determination before proceeding with any further collection activities. The debt collectors determination shall be based on all of the information provided by the debtor and other information available to the debt collector in its file or from the creditor.
(e)No inference or presumption that the debt is valid or invalid, or that the debtor is liable or not liable for the debt, shall arise if the debt collector decides after the review described in subdivision (d) to cease or recommence the debt collection activities. The exercise or nonexercise of rights under this section is not a waiver of any other right or defense of the debtor or debt collector.
(f)The statement and supporting documents that comply with subdivision (a) may also satisfy, to the extent those documents meet the requirements of, the notice requirement of paragraph (5) of subdivision (c) of Section 1798.93.
(g)A debt collector who ceases collection activities under this section and does not recommence those collection activities shall do both of the following:
(1)If the debt collector has furnished adverse information to a consumer credit reporting agency, notify the agency to delete that information no later than 10 business days after making its determination.
(2)Notify the creditor no later than 10 business days after making its determination that debt collection activities have been terminated based upon the debtors claim of identity theft.
(h)A debt collector who has possession of documents that the debtor is entitled to request from a creditor pursuant to Section 530.8 of the Penal Code is authorized to provide those documents to the debtor.
(i)The(i)Notwithstanding subdivision (h) of Section 1788.2, for the purposes of this section, debtor means a natural person, firm, association, organization, partnership, business trust, company, corporation, or limited liability company from which a debt collector seeks to collect a debt that is due and owing or alleged to be due and owing from the person or entity. The remedies provided by this title shall apply equally to violations of this section.
SEC. 13.Section 1788.20 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.20.In connection with any request or application for covered credit, no person shall:
(a)Request or apply for that credit at a time when that person knows there is no reasonable probability of that persons being able, or that person then lacks the intention, to pay the obligation created thereby in accordance with the terms and conditions of the credit extension.
(b)Knowingly submit false or inaccurate information or willfully conceal adverse information bearing upon that persons credit worthiness, credit standing, or credit capacity.
SEC. 14.Section 1788.21 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.21.(a)In connection with any covered credit existing or requested to be extended to a person, that person shall within a reasonable time notify the creditor or prospective creditor of any change in that persons name, address, or employment.
(b)Each responsibility set forth in subdivision (a) shall apply only if and after the creditor clearly and conspicuously in writing discloses that responsibility to that person.
SEC. 15.Section 1788.22 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.22.(a)In connection with any covered credit extended to a person under an account:
(1)No such person shall attempt to consummate any consumer credit transaction or small business credit transaction thereunder knowing that credit privileges under the account have been terminated or suspended.
(2)Each such person shall notify the creditor by telephone, telegraph, letter, or any other reasonable means that an unauthorized use of the account has occurred or may occur as the result of loss or theft of a credit card, or other instrument identifying the account, within a reasonable time after that persons discovery thereof, and shall reasonably assist the creditor in determining the facts and circumstances relating to any unauthorized use of the account.
(b)Each responsibility set forth in subdivision (a) shall apply only if and after the creditor clearly and conspicuously in writing discloses that responsibility to that person.
SEC. 16.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
(a)The Legislature makes the following findings:
(1)The banking and credit system and grantors of credit to consumers are dependent upon the collection of just and owing debts. Unfair or deceptive collection practices undermine the public confidence confidence, which is essential to the continued functioning of the banking and credit system and sound extensions of credit to consumers. consumers and small businesses.
(2)There is need to ensure that debt collectors and debtors exercise their responsibilities to one another with fairness, honesty and due regard for the rights of the other.
(b)It is the purpose of this title to prohibit debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of consumer debts and small business debts and to require debtors to act fairly in entering into and honoring such those debts, as specified in this title.
SEC. 2.Section 1788.2 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.2.(a)Definitions and rules of construction set forth in this section are applicable for the purpose of this title.
(b)The term debt collection means any act or practice in connection with the collection of consumer covered debts.
(c)The term debt collector means any person who, in the ordinary course of business, regularly, on behalf of that person or others, engages in debt collection. The term includes any person who composes and sells, or offers to compose and sell, forms, letters, and other collection media used or intended to be used for debt collection.
(d)The term debt means money, property, or their equivalent that is due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person to another person.
(e)The term consumer credit transaction means a transaction between a natural person and another person in which property, services, or money is acquired on credit by that natural person from the other person primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
(f)The terms consumer debt and consumer credit mean money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person by reason of a consumer credit transaction. The term consumer debt includes a mortgage debt.
(g)The term person means a natural person, partnership, corporation, limited liability company, trust, estate, cooperative, association, or other similar entity.
(h)Except as provided in Section 1788.18, the The term debtor means a natural person from whom a debt collector seeks to collect a consumer covered debt that is due and owing or alleged to be due and owing from such that person.
(i)The term creditor means a person who extends consumer covered credit to a debtor.
(j)The term consumer credit report means any written, oral, or other communication of any information by a consumer reporting agency bearing on a consumers creditworthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living that is used or expected to be used or collected in whole or in part for the purpose of serving as a factor in establishing the consumers eligibility for (1) credit or insurance to be used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, or (2) employment purposes, or (3) other purposes authorized under any applicable federal or state law or regulation. The term does not include (a) any report containing information solely as to transactions or experiences between the consumer and the person making the report; (b) any authorization or approval of a specific extension of credit directly or indirectly by the issuer of a credit card or similar device; or (c) any report in which a person who has been requested by a third party to make a specific extension of credit directly or indirectly to a consumer conveys that persons decision with respect to that request, if the third party advises the consumer of the name and address of the person to whom the request was made, and the person makes the disclosures to the consumer required under any applicable federal or state law or regulation.
(k)The term consumer reporting agency means any person that, for monetary fees, dues, or on a cooperative nonprofit basis, regularly engages, in whole or in part, in the practice of assembling or evaluating consumer credit information or other information on consumers for the purpose of furnishing consumer credit reports to third parties and uses any means or facility for the purpose of preparing or furnishing consumer credit reports.
(l)The term covered debt means a consumer debt or a small business debt.
(m)The term covered credit means consumer credit or small business credit.
(n)The term small business means an independently owned and operated business that is not dominant in its field of operation and meets all of the following criteria:
(1)The principal office of the business is located in California.
(2)The officers of the business are domiciled in California.
(3)The business, together with its affiliates, has 100 or fewer employees.
(4)The business had average annual gross receipts of fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000) or less over the previous three years.
(o)The terms small business debt and small business credit mean money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person by reason of a small business credit transaction.
(p)The term small business credit transaction means a transaction between a small business or small business owner and another person in which property, services, or money is acquired on credit by that small business or small business owner from the other person primarily for purposes related to the activities of the small business.
SEC. 3.Section 1788.10 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.10.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a consumer covered debt by means of the following conduct:
(a)The use, or threat of use, of physical force or violence or any criminal means to cause harm to the person, or the reputation, or the property of any person; person.
(b)The threat that the failure to pay a consumer covered debt will result in an accusation that the debtor has committed a crime where such the accusation, if made, would be false; false.
(c)The communication of, or threat to communicate to any person the fact that a debtor has engaged in conduct, other than the failure to pay a consumer covered debt, which the debt collector knows or has reason to believe will defame the debtor; debtor.
(d)The threat to the debtor to sell or assign to another person the obligation of the debtor to pay a consumer covered debt, with an accompanying false representation that the result of such the sale or assignment would be that the debtor would lose any defense to the consumer debt; covered debt.
(e)The threat to any person that nonpayment of the consumer covered debt may result in the arrest of the debtor or the seizure, garnishment, attachment or sale of any property or the garnishment or attachment of wages of the debtor, unless such the action is in fact contemplated by the debt collector and permitted by the law; or law.
(f)The threat to take any action against the debtor debtor, which is prohibited by this title.
SEC. 4.Section 1788.11 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.11.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a consumer covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Using obscene or profane language.
(b)Placing a telephone call without disclosing the callers identity, provided that an employee of a licensed collection agency may identify oneself by using their registered alias name if they correctly identify the agency that they represent. A debt collector shall provide its California debt collector license number upon the consumers request.
(c)Causing expense to any person for long distance telephone calls, telegram fees, or charges for other similar communications, by misrepresenting to the person the purpose of the telephone call, telegram or similar communication.
(d)Causing a telephone to ring repeatedly or continuously to annoy the person called.
(e)Communicating, by telephone or in person, with the debtor with such frequency as to be unreasonable, and to constitute harassment of the debtor under the circumstances.
(f)Sending written or digital communication to the person that does not display the California license number of the collector in at least 12-point type.
SEC. 5.Section 1788.12 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.12.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a consumer covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Communicating with the debtors employer regarding the debtors consumer covered debt unless such a communication is necessary to the collection of the debt, or unless the debtor or his their attorney has consented in writing to such that communication. A communication is necessary to the collection of the debt only if it is made for the purposes of verifying the debtors employment, locating the debtor, or effecting garnishment, after judgment, of the debtors wages, or in the case of a medical debt for the purpose of discovering the existence of medical insurance. Any such communication, other than a communication in the case of a medical debt by a health care provider or its agent for the purpose of discovering the existence of medical insurance, shall be in writing unless such that written communication receives no response within 15 days and shall be made only as many times as is necessary to the collection of the debt. Communications to a debtors employer regarding a debt shall not contain language that would be improper if the communication were made to the debtor. One communication solely for the purpose of verifying the debtors employment may be oral without prior written contact.
(b)Communicating information regarding a consumer covered debt to any member of the debtors family, other than the debtors spouse or the parents or guardians of the debtor who is either a minor or who resides in the same household with such that parent or guardian, prior to obtaining a judgment against the debtor, except where the purpose of the communication is to locate the debtor, or where the debtor or his their attorney has consented in writing to such communication; that communication.
(c)Communicating to any person any list of debtors which that discloses the nature or existence of a consumer covered debt, commonly known as deadbeat lists, or advertising any consumer covered debt for sale, by naming the debtor; or debtor.
(d)Communicating with the debtor by means of a written communication that displays or conveys any information about the consumer covered debt or the debtor other than the name, address and telephone number of the debtor and the debt collector and which that is intended both to be seen by any other person and also to embarrass the debtor.
(e)Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this section, the disclosure, publication or communication by a debt collector of information relating to a consumer covered debt or the debtor to a consumer reporting agency or to any other person reasonably believed to have a legitimate business need for such that information shall not be deemed to violate this title.
SEC. 6.Section 1788.13 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.13.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a consumer covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Any communication with the debtor other than in the name either of the debt collector or the person on whose behalf the debt collector is acting; acting.
(b)Any false representation that any person is an attorney or counselor at law; law.
(c)Any communication with a debtor in the name of an attorney or counselor at law or upon stationery or like written instruments bearing the name of the attorney or counselor at law, unless such that communication is by an attorney or counselor at law or shall have been approved or authorized by such that attorney or counselor at law; law.
(d)The representation that any debt collector is vouched for, bonded by, affiliated with, or is an instrumentality, agent or official of any federal, state or local government or any agency of federal, state or local government, unless the collector is actually employed by the particular governmental agency in question and is acting on behalf of such that agency in the debt collection matter; matter.
(e)The false representation that the consumer covered debt may be increased by the addition of attorneys fees, investigation fees, service fees, finance charges, or other charges if, in fact, such those fees or charges may not legally be added to the existing obligation; obligation.
(f)The false representation that information concerning a debtors failure or alleged failure to pay a consumer covered debt has been or is about to be referred to a consumer reporting agency; agency.
(g)The false representation that a debt collector is a consumer reporting agency; agency.
(h)The false representation that collection letters, notices or other printed forms are being sent by or on behalf of a claim, credit, audit audit, or legal department; department.
(i)The false representation of the true nature of the business or services being rendered by the debt collector; collector.
(j)The false representation that a legal proceeding has been, is about to be, or will be instituted unless payment of a consumer covered debt is made; made.
(k)The false representation that a consumer covered debt has been, is about to be, or will be sold, assigned, or referred to a debt collector for collection; or collection.
(l)Any communication by a licensed collection agency to a debtor demanding money unless the claim is actually assigned to the collection agency.
SEC. 7.Section 1788.14 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.14.No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a consumer covered debt by means of the following practices:
(a)Obtaining an affirmation from a debtor of a consumer covered debt that has been discharged in bankruptcy, without clearly and conspicuously disclosing to the debtor, in writing, at the time the affirmation is sought, the fact that the debtor is not legally obligated to make an affirmation.
(b)Collecting or attempting to collect from the debtor the whole or any part of the debt collectors fee or charge for services rendered, or other expense incurred by the debt collector in the collection of the consumer covered debt, except as permitted by law.
(c)Initiating communications, other than statements of account, with the debtor with regard to the consumer covered debt, when the debt collector has been previously notified in writing by the debtors attorney that the debtor is represented by the attorney with respect to the consumer covered debt and the notice includes the attorneys name and address and a request by the attorney that all communications regarding the consumer covered debt be addressed to the attorney, unless the attorney fails to answer correspondence, return telephone calls, or discuss the obligation in question. This subdivision shall not apply if prior approval has been obtained from the debtors attorney, or if the communication is a response in the ordinary course of business to a debtors inquiry.
(d)Sending a written communication to a debtor in an attempt to collect a time-barred debt without providing the debtor with one of the following written notices:
(1)If the debt is not past the date for obsolescence set forth in Section 605(a) of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681c), the following notice shall be included in the first written communication provided to the debtor after the debt has become time-barred:
The law limits how long you can be sued on a debt. Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it. If you do not pay the debt, [insert name of debt collector] may [continue to] report it to the credit reporting agencies as unpaid for as long as the law permits this reporting.
(2)If the debt is past the date for obsolescence set forth in Section 605(a) of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681c), the following notice shall be included in the first written communication provided to the debtor after the date for obsolescence:
The law limits how long you can be sued on a debt. Because of the age of your debt, we will not sue you for it, and we will not report it to any credit reporting agency.
(e)Collecting consumer debt that originated with a hospital licensed pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code without including in the first written communication to the debtor a copy of the notice required pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 127425 of the Health and Safety Code and a statement that the debt collector will wait at least 180 days from the date the debtor was initially billed for the hospital services that are the basis of the debt before reporting adverse information to a credit reporting agency or filing a lawsuit against the debtor.
(f)For purposes of this section, first written communication means the first communication sent to the debtor in writing or by facsimile, email, or other similar means.
SEC. 8.Section 1788.14.5 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.14.5.(a)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall provide to the debtor, upon the debtors written request, a statement that includes all of the following information pursuant to subdivision (c):
(1)That the debt collector has authority to assert the rights of the creditor to collect the debt.
(2)(A)The debt balance and an explanation of the amount, nature, and reason for all interest and fees, if any, imposed by the creditor or any subsequent entities to which the debt was assigned.
(B)The explanation required by subparagraph (A) shall identify separately the balance, the total of any interest, and the total of any fees.
(3)The date the debt became delinquent or the date of the last payment.
(4)The name and an address of the creditor and the creditors account number associated with the debt. The creditors name and address shall be in sufficient form so as to reasonably identify the creditor.
(5)The name and last known address of the debtor as they appeared in the creditors records before the assignment of the debt to the debt collector.
(6)The names and addresses of all persons or entities other than the debt collector to which the debt was assigned. The names and addresses shall be in sufficient form so as to reasonably identify each assignee.
(7)The California license number of the debt collector.
(b)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall not make a written statement to a debtor in an attempt to collect a delinquent debt unless the debt collector has access to a copy of a contract or other document evidencing the debtors agreement to the debt, except in the following circumstances:
(1)If the claim is based on debt for which no signed contract or agreement exists, the debt collector shall have access to a copy of a document provided to the debtor while the account was active, demonstrating that the debt was incurred by the debtor.
(2)For a revolving credit account, the most recent monthly statement recording a purchase transaction, last payment, or balance transfer shall be deemed sufficient to satisfy the requirements of this subparagraph.
(c)(1)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall provide the information or documents identified in subdivisions (a) and (b) to the debtor without charge within 30 calendar days of receipt of a debtors written request for information regarding the debt or proof of the debt.
(2)If the debt collector cannot provide the information or documents within 30 calendar days, the debt collector shall cease all collection of the debt until the debt collector provides the debtor the information or documents described in subdivisions (a) and (b).
(d)(1)A debt collector shall provide a debtor with whom it has contact an active postal address to which a debtor may send a request for the information described in this section.
(2)A debt collector may also provide an active email address to which these requests can be sent and through which information and documents can be delivered if the parties agree.
(e)(1)A debt collector to which delinquent debt has been assigned shall include in its first written communication with the debtor in no smaller than 12-point type, a separate prominent notice that contains the following statement:
You may request records showing the following: (1) that [insert name of debt collector] has the right to seek collection of the debt; (2) the debt balance, including an explanation of any interest charges and additional fees; (3) the date the debt became delinquent or the date of the last payment; (4) the name of the creditor and the account number associated with the debt; (5) the name and last known address of the debtor as it appeared in the creditors records prior to assignment of the debt; and (6) the names of all persons or entities other than the debt collector to which the debt has been assigned, if applicable. You may also request from us a copy of the contract or other document evidencing your agreement to the debt.
A request for these records may be addressed to: [insert debt collectors active mailing address and email address, if applicable].
(2)If a language other than English is principally used by the debt collector in the initial oral contact with the debtor, the notice required by this subdivision shall be provided to the debtor in that language within five business days.
(f)(1)A debt buyer that complies with the requirements of Section 1788.52 shall be deemed to be in compliance with this section.
(2)For purposes of this subdivision, debt buyer shall have the same meaning as in Section 1788.50.
(g)For the purposes of this section, the term delinquent debt means a consumer covered debt, other than a mortgage debt, that is past due at least 90 days and has not been charged off.
(h)This section shall apply to all delinquent debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2022.
(i)This section shall become operative on July 1, 2022.
SEC. 9.Section 1788.15 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.15.(a)No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a consumer covered debt by means of judicial proceedings when the debt collector knows that service of process, where essential to jurisdiction over the debtor or his their property, has not been legally effected.
(b)No debt collector shall collect or attempt to collect a consumer covered debt, other than one reduced to judgment, by means of judicial proceedings in a county other than the county in which the debtor has incurred the consumer covered debt or the county in which the debtor resides at the time such those proceedings are instituted, or resided at the time the debt was incurred.
SEC. 10.Section 1788.16 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.16.It is unlawful, with respect to attempted collection of a consumer covered debt, for a debt collector, creditor, or an attorney, attorney to send a communication which that simulates legal or judicial process or which that gives the appearance of being authorized, issued, or approved by a governmental agency or attorney when it is not. Any violation of the provisions of this section is a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) or by both.
SEC. 11.Section 1788.17 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.17.Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, every debt collector collecting or attempting to collect a consumer covered debt shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1692b to 1692j, inclusive, of, and shall be subject to the remedies in Section 1692k of, Title 15 of the United States Code. However, subsection (11) of Section 1692e and Section 1692g shall not apply to any person specified in paragraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (6) of Section 1692a of Title 15 of the United States Code or that persons principal. The references to federal codes in this section refer to those codes as they read January 1, 2001.
SEC. 12.Section 1788.18 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.18.(a)Upon receipt from a debtor of all of the following, a debt collector shall cease collection activities until completion of the review provided in subdivision (d):
(1)A copy of a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) identity theft report, completed and signed by the debtor. The debtor may choose, instead, to send a copy of a police report filed by the debtor alleging that the debtor is the victim of an identity theft crime, including, but not limited to, a violation of Section 530.5 of the Penal Code, for the specific debt being collected by the debt collector; however, the debt collector shall not also require a police report if the debtor submits an FTC identity theft report.
(2)The debtors written statement that the debtor claims to be the victim of identity theft with respect to the specific debt being collected by the debt collector.
(b)The written statement described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) shall consist of any either of the following:
(1)A written statement that contains the content of the Identity Theft Victims Fraudulent Account Information Request offered to the public by the California Office of Privacy Protection.
(2)A written statement that certifies that the representations are true, correct, and contain no material omissions of fact to the best knowledge and belief of the person submitting the certification. A person submitting the certification who declares as true any material matter pursuant to this subdivision that they know to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor. The statement shall contain or be accompanied by the following, to the extent that an item listed below is relevant to the debtors allegation of identity theft with respect to the debt in question:
(A)A statement that the debtor is a victim of identity theft.
(B)A copy of the debtors drivers license or identification card, as issued by the state.
(C)Any other identification document that supports the statement of identity theft.
(D)Specific facts supporting the claim of identity theft, if available.
(E)Any explanation showing that the debtor did not incur the debt.
(F)Any available correspondence disputing the debt after transaction information has been provided to the debtor.
(G)Documentation of the residence of the debtor at the time of the alleged debt. This may include copies of bills and statements, such as utility bills, tax statements, or other statements from businesses sent to the debtor, showing that the debtor lived at another residence at the time the debt was incurred.
(H)A telephone number for contacting the debtor concerning any additional information or questions, or direction that further communications to the debtor be in writing only, with the mailing address specified in the statement.
(I)To the extent the debtor has information concerning who may have incurred the debt, the identification of any person whom the debtor believes is responsible.
(J)An express statement that the debtor did not authorize the use of the debtors name or personal information for incurring the debt.
(K)The certification required pursuant to this paragraph shall be sufficient if it is in substantially the following form:
I certify the representations made are true, correct, and | |
(Date and Place)(Signature) |
(c)If a debtor notifies a debt collector orally that they are a victim of identity theft, the debt collector shall notify the debtor, orally or in writing, that the debtors claim must be in writing. If a debtor notifies a debt collector in writing that they are a victim of identity theft, but omits information required pursuant to subdivision (a) or, if applicable, the certification required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), if the debt collector does not cease collection activities, the debt collector shall provide written notice to the debtor of the additional information that is required, or the certification required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), as applicable, or send the debtor a copy of the Federal Trade Commissions identity theft form.
(d)Within 10 business days of receiving the complete statement and information described in subdivision (a), the debt collector shall, if it furnished adverse information about the debtor to a consumer credit reporting agency, notify the consumer credit reporting agency that the account is disputed, and initiate a review considering all of the information provided by the debtor and other information available to the debt collector in its file or from the creditor. The debt collector shall send notice of its determination to the debtor no later than 10 business days after concluding the review. The debt collector may recommence debt collection activities only upon making a good faith determination that the information does not establish that the debtor is not responsible for the specific debt in question. The debt collectors determination shall be made in a manner consistent with the provisions of subsection (1) of Section 1692f of Title 15 of the United States Code, as incorporated by Section 1788.17 of this code. The debt collector shall notify the debtor in writing of that determination and the basis for that determination before proceeding with any further collection activities. The debt collectors determination shall be based on all of the information provided by the debtor and other information available to the debt collector in its file or from the creditor.
(e)No inference or presumption that the debt is valid or invalid, or that the debtor is liable or not liable for the debt, shall arise if the debt collector decides after the review described in subdivision (d) to cease or recommence the debt collection activities. The exercise or nonexercise of rights under this section is not a waiver of any other right or defense of the debtor or debt collector.
(f)The statement and supporting documents that comply with subdivision (a) may also satisfy, to the extent those documents meet the requirements of, the notice requirement of paragraph (5) of subdivision (c) of Section 1798.93.
(g)A debt collector who ceases collection activities under this section and does not recommence those collection activities shall do all both of the following:
(1)If the debt collector has furnished adverse information to a consumer credit reporting agency, notify the agency to delete that information no later than 10 business days after making its determination.
(2)Notify the creditor no later than 10 business days after making its determination that debt collection activities have been terminated based upon the debtors claim of identity theft.
(h)A debt collector who has possession of documents that the debtor is entitled to request from a creditor pursuant to Section 530.8 of the Penal Code is authorized to provide those documents to the debtor.
(i)Notwithstanding subdivision (h) of Section 1788.2, for the purposes of this section, debtor means a natural person, firm, association, organization, partnership, business trust, company, corporation, or limited liability company from which a debt collector seeks to collect a debt that is due and owing or alleged to be due and owing from the person or entity. The remedies provided by this title shall apply equally to violations of this section.
SEC. 13.Section 1788.20 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.20.In connection with any request or application for consumer covered credit, no person shall:
(a)Request or apply for such that credit at a time when such that person knows there is no reasonable probability of such that persons being able, or such that person then lacks the intention, to pay the obligation created thereby in accordance with the terms and conditions of the credit extension; or extension.
(b)Knowingly submit false or inaccurate information or willfully conceal adverse information bearing upon such that persons credit worthiness, credit standing, or credit capacity.
SEC. 14.Section 1788.21 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.21.(a)In connection with any consumer covered credit existing or requested to be extended to a person, such that person shall within a reasonable time notify the creditor or prospective creditor of any change in such that persons name, address, or employment.
(b)Each responsibility set forth in subdivision (a) shall apply only if and after the creditor clearly and conspicuously in writing discloses such that responsibility to such that person.
SEC. 15.Section 1788.22 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1788.22.(a)In connection with any consumer covered credit extended to a person under an account:
(1)No such person shall attempt to consummate any consumer credit transaction or small business credit transaction thereunder knowing that credit privileges under the account have been terminated or suspended.
(2)Each such person shall notify the creditor by telephone, telegraph, letter, or any other reasonable means that an unauthorized use of the account has occurred or may occur as the result of loss or theft of a credit card, or other instrument identifying the account, within a reasonable time after such that persons discovery thereof, and shall reasonably assist the creditor in determining the facts and circumstances relating to any unauthorized use of the account.
(b)Each responsibility set forth in subdivision (a) shall apply only if and after the creditor clearly and conspicuously in writing discloses such that responsibility to such that person.
SEC. 16.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
SECTION 1.Section 1799.302 of the Civil Code is amended to read:1799.302.A covered entity shall not charge any of the following in connection with a commercial financing transaction with a small business or small business owner:(a)A fee for accepting or processing a payment required by the terms of the commercial financing contract as an automated clearinghouse transfer debit, except for a fee imposed for a payment by an automated clearinghouse transfer that fails because of insufficient funds in the transferors account.(b)A fee for providing a small business with documentation prepared by the covered entity that contains a statement of the amount due to satisfy the remaining amount owed, including, but not limited to, interest accrued to the date the statement is prepared and a means of calculating per diem interest accruing thereafter.(c)A fee in addition to an origination fee that does not have a clear corresponding service provided for the fee, including, but not limited to, a risk assessment, due diligence, or platform fee.(d)A fee for monitoring the small business collateral, unless the underlying commercial financing transaction is delinquent for more than 60 days.(e)A fee for filing or terminating a lien filed in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code against the businesss assets that exceeds 150 percent of the cost of the filing or termination.A covered entity shall not charge any of the following in connection with a commercial financing transaction with a small business or small business owner:
(a)A fee for accepting or processing a payment required by the terms of the commercial financing contract as an automated clearinghouse transfer debit, except for a fee imposed for a payment by an automated clearinghouse transfer that fails because of insufficient funds in the transferors account.
(b)A fee for providing a small business with documentation prepared by the covered entity that contains a statement of the amount due to satisfy the remaining amount owed, including, but not limited to, interest accrued to the date the statement is prepared and a means of calculating per diem interest accruing thereafter.
(c)A fee in addition to an origination fee that does not have a clear corresponding service provided for the fee, including, but not limited to, a risk assessment, due diligence, or platform fee.
(d)A fee for monitoring the small businesss business collateral, unless the underlying commercial financing transaction is delinquent for more than 60 days.
(e)A fee for filing or terminating a lien filed in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code against the businesss assets that exceeds 150 percent of the cost of the filing or termination.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2024 | Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 522, Statutes of 2024. |
| Sep 24, 2024 | Approved by the Governor. |
| Sep 11, 2024 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m. |
| Aug 31, 2024 | Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 30. Noes 9. Page 5772.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling. |
| Aug 30, 2024 | In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending. |
| Aug 29, 2024 | Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 49. Noes 17. Page 6891.) Ordered to the Senate. |
| Aug 23, 2024 | Read third time and amended. |
| Aug 23, 2024 | Ordered to third reading. |
| Aug 19, 2024 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Aug 15, 2024 | From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 3.) (August 15). |
| Aug 7, 2024 | August 7 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file. |
| Jul 3, 2024 | Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Jul 2, 2024 | From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 2.) (July 2). |
| Jul 2, 2024 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on JUD. |
| Jun 24, 2024 | Assembly Rule 56 suspended. |
| Jun 3, 2024 | Referred to Coms. on B. & F. and JUD. |
| May 22, 2024 | In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk. |
| May 21, 2024 | Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 9. Page 4057.) Ordered to the Assembly. |
| May 14, 2024 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| May 13, 2024 | From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8. |
| May 3, 2024 | Set for hearing May 13. |
| Apr 25, 2024 | Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Apr 24, 2024 | From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 2. Page 3726.) (April 23). |
| Apr 17, 2024 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 2. Page 3658.) (April 17). Re-referred to Com. on JUD. |
| Apr 9, 2024 | Set for hearing April 23 in JUD. pending receipt. |
| Apr 5, 2024 | Set for hearing April 17. |
| Apr 3, 2024 | Re-referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and JUD. |
| Mar 18, 2024 | From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. |
| Feb 29, 2024 | Referred to Com. on RLS. |
| Feb 16, 2024 | From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 17. |
| Feb 15, 2024 | Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2024 | Unfinished Business SB1286 Min Concurrence | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Aug 29, 2024 | SB 1286 Min Senate Third Reading By Kalra | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Aug 15, 2024 | Do pass. | Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Jul 2, 2024 | Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary |
Passed |
|
| Jul 1, 2024 | Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary] | Assembly Standing Committee on Banking and Finance |
Passed |
|
| May 21, 2024 | Senate 3rd Reading SB1286 Min | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Apr 23, 2024 | Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations] | Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary |
Passed |
|
| Apr 17, 2024 | Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary] | Senate Standing Committee on Banking and Financial Institutions |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| American Financial Services Association | * Neutral | Jul 1, 2024 |
| American Financial Services Association | ** Against | |
| ASiAN, Inc. | ** Support | |
| Berkeley Law & Organizing Collective | ** Support | |
| Bet Tzedek Legal Services | ** Support | |
| California Association For Microenterprise Opportunity | * Support | Apr 17, 2024 |
| California Association of Collectors, Inc. | ** Against | |
| California Bankers Association | ** Against | |
| California Chamber Of Commerce | ** Against | |
| California Coalition for Community Investment | ** Support | |
| California Community Banking Network | ** Against | |
| California Credit Union League | ** Against | |
| California Creditors Bar Association | ** Against | |
| California Financial Services Association | ** Against | |
| California Low-Income Consumer Coalition | ** Support | |
| California Mortgage Bankers Association | ** Against | |
| Cameo - California Association for Micro Enterprise Opportunity | ** Support | |
| Capital Advocacy | * Against | Apr 23, 2024 |
| City Of Irvine | * Support | Jul 1, 2024 |
| Collection Bureau of America | * Against | Apr 17, 2024 |
| Consumer Attorneys Of California | ** Support | |
| Consumer Federation Of California | ** Support | |
| Continental Credit Control | * Against | Apr 17, 2024 |
| Cox Automotive | * Neutral | Jul 1, 2024 |
| Cox Automotive, INC. | ** Against | |
| Credit Consulting Services | * Indeterminate | Apr 17, 2024 |
| Decosimo Law | ** Support | |
| Department of Financial Protection and Innovation | * Support | Jul 2, 2024 |
| E&A Group | * Against | Apr 17, 2024 |
| East Bay Community Law Center | ** Support | |
| Electronic Transactions Association | ** Against | |
| Grant Mercantile | * Against | Apr 17, 2024 |
| Housing and Economic Rights Advocates | ** Support | |
| Ica | ** Support | |
| La Cocina | ** Support | |
| MicroEnterprise Collaborative of Inland Southern California | ** Support | |
| Public Counsel | ** Support | |
| Public Law Center | ** Support | |
| Receivables Management Association International | ** Against | |
| Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center | ** Support | |
| Responsible Business Lending Coalition | ** Support | |
| Rise Economy | ** Support | |
| San Francisco, California | * Support | Jul 1, 2024 |
| San Juan Capistrano Chamber of Commerce | ** Support | |
| Small Business Finance Association | ** Against | |
| Small Business Majority | ** Support | |
| Sonya Yruel Photography | ** Support | |
| Student at UC Berkeley | * Support | Jul 1, 2024 |
| The Lisa B Company | ** Support | |
| UC Berkeley Law School | * Support | Jul 2, 2024 |
| Women's Economic Ventures | ** Support |
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | SB 1286 |
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Bill No: SB 1286
Author: Min (D)
Amended: 8/23/24
Vote: 21
SENATE BANKING & F.I. COMMITTEE: 4-2, 4/17/24
AYES: Limón, Caballero, Min, Portantino
NOES: Niello, Nguyen
NO VOTE RECORDED: Bradford
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE: 9-2, 4/23/24
AYES: Umberg, Allen, Ashby, Caballero, Durazo, Gonzalez, Laird, Min, Wahab
NOES: Wilk, Niello
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: Senate Rule 28.8
SENATE FLOOR: 28-9, 5/21/24
AYES: Archuleta, Ashby, Atkins, Becker, Blakespear, Caballero, Cortese, Dodd, Durazo, Eggman, Glazer, Gonzalez, Hurtado, Laird, Limón, McGuire, Menjivar, Min, Newman, Padilla, Portantino, Rubio, Skinner, Smallwood-Cuevas, Stern, Umberg, Wahab, Wiener
NOES: Alvarado-Gil, Dahle, Grove, Jones, Nguyen, Niello, Ochoa Bogh, Seyarto, Wilk
NO VOTE RECORDED: Allen, Bradford, Roth
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 49-17, 8/29/24 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: covered debt: commercial debts
SOURCE: Cameo -California Association for Micro Enterprise Opportunity Consumer Federation of California
East Bat Community Law Center
Small Business Majority
DIGEST:
This bill expands the scope of the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Rosenthal Act) to cover specified commercial debt, providing certain debtors with protections from harassment and other prohibited collections activities.
Assembly Amendments
provide that this bill applies to commercial debt entered into, renewed, sold, or assigned on or after July 1, 2025; provide that this bill does not impose a licensing requirement for commercial debt collection; limit the scope of covered commercial debt to situations where the debtor does not owe more than $500,000 to the same lender, commercial financing provider, or debt buyer, as specified; exempts a covered commercial debt from the prohibition on communicating information about a debt to a member of the debtor’s family; and make other technical changes.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- Regulates the collection of consumer debt under the Rosenthal Act, which generally prohibits deceptive, dishonest, unfair, and unreasonable debt collection practices by debt collectors and regulates the form and content of communications by debt collectors to debtors and others. (Title 1.6C of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, Section 1788 et seq.) The Rosenthal Act:
- Defines the following terms:
- “Consumer debt” and “consumer credit” means money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person by reason of a consumer credit transaction. The term “consumer debt” includes a mortgage debt.
- “Consumer credit transaction” means a transaction between a natural person and another person in which property, services, or money is acquired on credit by that natural person from the other person primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
- “Debt collector” means any person who, in the ordinary course of business, regularly, on behalf of that person or others, engages in debt collection.
- “Debt collection” means any act or practice in connection with the collection of consumer debts. (Civil Code Section 1788.2)
- Prohibits a debt collector from the following conducts or practices, among others, when collecting or attempting to collect a consumer debt:
- The use or threat of physical force or violence. (Civil Code Section 1788.10)
- Threats and communications that rely on false representations. (Civil Code Section 1788.10 and 1788.13)
- Using obscene or profane language. (Civil Code Section 1788.11)
- Communicating with the debtor with such frequency as to be unreasonable, and to constitute harassment of the debtor under the circumstances. (Civil Code Section 1788.11)
- Communicating unnecessarily about the debtor’s debt with the debtor’s employer or extended family. (Civil Code Section 1788.12)
- Requires a debt collector to provide its California debt collector license number to a consumer in specified circumstances. (Civil Code Section 1788.11)
- Incorporates by reference specified provisions of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act into state law. (Civil Code Section 1788.17)
- Provides remedies to a harmed debtor in an amount equal to any actual damages sustained by the debtor as a result of violation, plus an amount of $100 - $1,000 if the violation was conducted willfully and knowingly by the debt collector. (Civil Code Section 1788.30)
- Provides a release from liability to a debt collector who cures a violation, as specified, or who shows by a preponderance of evidence that the violation was not intentional and resulted notwithstanding the maintenance of procedures reasonably adapted to avoid any such violation. (Civil Code Section 1788.30)
- Defines the following terms:
- Provides the Debt Collection Licensing Act (DCLA) that prohibits a person from engaging in the business of the collection of consumer debt without a license and requires the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation to administer the licensing program. (Division 25 of the Financial Code, Section 100000 et seq.)
This bill:
- Adds “covered commercial debt” to the Rosenthal Act, subjecting persons that engage in debt collection related to a covered commercial debt to that act.
- Defines the following terms:
- “Covered debt” means a consumer debt or a covered commercial debt.
- “Covered credit” means consumer credit or covered commercial credit.
- “Covered commercial debt” and “covered commercial credit” mean money due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person to a lender, a commercial financing provider, or a debt buyer, as specified, by reason of one or more covered commercial credit transactions, provided the total amount of all covered commercial credit transactions and all other noncovered commercial credit transactions due and owing by the debtor to the same lender, commercial financing provider, or debt buyer is no more than $500,000, as specified.
- “Covered commercial credit transaction” means a transaction between a person and another person in which a total value of no more than $500,000, is acquired on credit by that person from the other person primarily for other than personal, family, or household purposes.
- Provides that a debtor includes a natural person who guarantees an obligation related to a covered commercial credit transaction and does not include a corporation or limited liability company.
- Replaces “consumer debt” with “covered debt” throughout the Rosenthal Act, except in provisions related to communications with a debtor’s employer or a debtor’s family, consumer debt originated by a hospital, and an incorporation by reference of provisions of specified federal law related to consumer debt collection.
- Authorizes a debt collector to collect covered commercial debt by means of a judicial proceeding in the county in which the nonnatural person for whose purpose the commercial debt was incurred is located.
- Provides that this bill does not impose a licensing requirement for the collection of covered commercial debt.
- Provides that this bill applies to covered commercial credit or covered commercial debt entered into, renewed, sold, or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
Comments
Author’s Statement. According to the author:
Navigating the small business lending landscape is a longstanding, serious challenge for entrepreneurs. Traditional bank lending to small businesses is inaccessible to most entrepreneurs, especially entrepreneurs of color and women entrepreneurs. Alternative lenders have stepped in to fill this gap, but do not operate under the same regulations as traditional lenders. Since the 2008 Great Recession, many lenders started requiring business owners to personally sign for their business debt. Lenders are within their right to require co-signatories, however a personal guarantee defeats the purpose of an LLC and is antithetical to the purpose of entity formation. Given the lack of access to traditional business funding and the current trend of requiring personal guarantees, the need for dignified debt collection practices for individuals who incur debt for their business is necessary as small businesses do not have the same protections as consumers in the collection of a business debt. SB 1286 would extend the consumer debt collection protections provided under the Rosenthal Act to small business owners.
Background
This bill seeks to extend the scope of the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“Rosenthal Act”) to certain commercial debts. At its essence, the Rosenthal Act seeks to protect consumers from unfair and deceptive practices by a person collecting consumer debt. The law prohibits or restricts a variety of activities designed to intimidate or annoy, such as calling a debtor in the middle of the night; letting a phone ring incessantly; threatening actions that the debt collector cannot or does not plan to take; threatening or using violence; contacting a debtor’s friends, employers, or extended family to notify them of the debtor’s debt; and using obscene or threatening language. The law also prohibits various false representations, unfair practices, and improper use of judicial proceedings.
The remedies provided by the Rosenthal Act are fairly modest. Nothing in the Rosenthal Act allows for the forgiveness or cancellation of debt. The law provides avenues to avoid liability in the case of unintentional errors and a 15-day right to cure any violation. If a debt collector violates the law, they may be found liable for actual damages sustained by the debtor, but often such damages are related to stress and not monetary in nature. For a debt collector who willfully and knowingly violates the law, the Rosenthal Act provides a minimum liability of $100 and maximum liability of $1,000, in addition to any actual damages incurred and reasonable attorney’s fees.
Expanding the scope of Rosenthal. This bill adds specified commercial debts to the scope of the Rosenthal Act, which would grant the same protections to persons owing these commercial debts as are provided by existing law to persons owing consumer debt. This bill expands the scope of Rosenthal to cover debts that meet all of the following criteria:
- Who owes? The debt must be owed by a natural person. The author intends to cover debts owed directly by a natural person or where a natural person has co-signed or provided a personal guarantee on a credit product. The author does not intend to cover a debt owed by a business entity, such as a corporation or LLC, that does not contain a personal guarantee.
- What for? The underlying credit transaction was undertaken “for use primarily for other than personal, family, or household purposes.” This phrase is used in the California Financing Law to distinguish a “commercial loan” from a “consumer loan.”
- Owed to whom? The debt must be owed to a lender, a commercial financing provider, or a debt buyer. This keeps credit transactions between two non-financial businesses outside of the scope of Rosenthal, meaning a supplier that provides goods on credit will not be deemed a debt collector.
- How much is owed? The underlying credit transaction that created the debt cannot exceed $500,000. This same threshold exists for the state’s commercial financing disclosure law and a law enacted last year that prohibits certain “junk fees” on commercial financing transactions. Amendments adopted by the Assembly apply this limit cumulatively to all amounts owed by the debtor to a specific lender, commercial financing provider, or debt buyer. For example, a debtor who owes $400,000 on one loan and $200,000 on another loan from the same lender will not be covered by this bill as the cumulative amount owed exceeds $500,000.
Is the Rosenthal Act Appropriate for Commercial Debt? The Rosenthal Act was enacted in 1977 to regulate the collection of consumer debt. Some of its provisions, such as prohibitions on threats and harassment, can be readily applied to collections related to commercial debt. Other provisions, however, may be less suitable. For example, one provision prohibits a debt collector from communicating with a debtor’s employer, which does not contemplate a situation where the debtor is self-employed and the debt is related to the debtor’s commercial activities. Additionally, the Rosenthal Act incorporates by reference provisions of the Federal Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA), which covers consumer debt and cannot be used as a basis for a person collecting a commercial debt to “comply” with. The bill has been amended to address these potential incongruities.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: Yes
According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee,
- Minor and absorbable costs to the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) to update manuals, examinations, and procedures. DFPI does not license debt collectors, but does license lenders and has the authority to oversee other consumer financial products or services through the California Consumer Financial Protection Law.
- Annual cost pressures (General Fund (GF) or Trial Court Trust Fund (TCTF)) of an unknown amount, potentially up to $150,000, to the courts in additional workload by expanding application of the Rosenthal Act, including the existing private right of action for harmed consumers, to covered commercial debt. It is unclear how many civil actions may be filed statewide, but the estimated workload cost of one hour of court time is $1,000. Although courts are not funded on the basis of workload, increased pressure on staff and the TCTF may create a need for increased court funding from the GF to perform existing duties. The Budget Act of 2024 includes $37.3 million ongoing GF to backfill declining TCTF revenue.
SUPPORT: (Verified 8/26/24)
Cameo - California Association for Micro Enterprise Opportunity (co-source)
Consumer Federation of California (co-source)
East Bay Community Law Center (co-source)
Small Business Majority (co-source)
25 Individuals
Asian, INC.
Berkeley Law & Organizing Collective
Bet Tzedek Legal Services
California Coalition for Community Investment
California Coalition for Community Investment (CCCI)
California Low-income Consumer Coalition
Consumer Attorneys of California
Decosimo Law
Housing and Economic Rights Advocates (HERA)
Ica
LA Cocina
Microenterprise Collaborative of Inland Southern California
Public Counsel
Public Law Center
Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center
Responsible Business Lending Coalition
Rise Economy
San Juan Capistrano Chamber of Commerce
Sonya Yruel Photography
The Lisa B Company
Women's Economic Ventures
OPPOSITION: (Verified 8/26/24)
American Financial Services Association
California Association of Collectors, Inc.
California Bankers Association
California Chamber of Commerce
California Community Banking Network
California Credit Union League
California Creditors Bar Association
California Financial Services Association
California Mortgage Bankers Association
Cox Automotive, INC.
Electronic Transactions Association
Receivables Management Association International
Small Business Finance Association
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: A coalition of small business and consumer advocacy organizations writes in support:
Since the 1970s, federal and CA law has prohibited debt collectors from lying, calling repeatedly in the middle of the night, publicly humiliating borrowers to pressure them, and so on. BUT, those laws don’t apply today to people when they borrow for a small businesses. SB 1286 simply extends the same protections that have applied on other loans since the ‘70s.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: A coalition of organizations representing lenders and creditors writes in opposition:
As amended, SB 1286 attempts to insert commercial debts into the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (the Act), a section of law that specifically contemplates nuances with individual consumers, not businesses. The Act contains some commonsense prohibitions on behavior that is deceptive or unreasonable, including prohibiting the use or threat of physical violence, using profane language, and threats that rely on false representations. The Act also contains provisions that are specific to individual consumers, such as prohibition of contacting a debtor's employer or restrictions on the jurisdiction of judicial proceedings, which make sense for individual consumers but do not comport in business commercial transactions.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 49-17, 8/29/24
AYES: Addis, Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Bauer-Kahan, Bennett, Berman, Boerner, Bonta, Bryan, Calderon, Juan Carrillo, Wendy Carrillo, Connolly, Mike Fong, Friedman, Gabriel, Garcia, Gipson, Grayson, Haney, Hart, Holden, Irwin, Jackson, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Lee, Low, Lowenthal, Maienschein, McCarty, McKinnor, Muratsuchi, Papan, Pellerin, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Blanca Rubio, Santiago, Ting, Ward, Weber, Wicks, Wilson, Wood, Robert Rivas
NOES: Alanis, Chen, Megan Dahle, Davies, Dixon, Essayli, Flora, Gallagher, Hoover, Lackey, Mathis, Jim Patterson, Joe Patterson, Sanchez, Ta, Waldron, Wallis
NO VOTE RECORDED: Alvarez, Bains, Cervantes, Stephanie Nguyen, Ortega, Pacheco, Ramos, Rodriguez, Schiavo, Soria, Valencia, Villapudua, Zbur
Prepared by: Michael Burdick / B. & F.I. /
8/29/24 19:44:25
**** END ****
SENATE THIRD READING
STR Bill Id:SB 1286
Author:(Min)
As Amended Ver:August 23, 2024
Majority vote
SUMMARY
Expands the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Rosenthal Act) to certain commercial debts entered into, renewed, sold, or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
Major Provisions
- Defines "covered commercial debt" as money due or owing from a natural person to a lender, commercial financing provider, or a debt buyer, by reason of a covered commercial credit transaction, provided that the aggregate amount of covered and non-covered commercial transactions due or owed to that same entity is equal to $500,000 or less.
- Applies specified Rosenthal Act provisions to delinquent covered commercial debt.
- Authorizes a debt collector to collect covered commercial debt sold or assigned through a judicial proceeding in the county in which the non-natural person that incurred the debt is located.
COMMENTS
Background: Protections related to the collection of consumer debt
An assortment of federal and state laws establish consumer protections related to debt collection and debt purchasing. These laws generally do not cover commercial debt. These consumer-centered statutes include:
- The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). In 1977, the federal government established the FDCPA to prohibit debt collectors from engaging in abusive, unfair or deceptive practices to collect debts. Violations of the FDCPA are enforceable through a private right of action or a class action, or through administrative action. Under the FDCPA, a debt collector must send a debtor written validation letters containing information such as the amount of debt and the name of the creditor to whom the debt is owed.
- The Rosenthal Act. This bill amends the Rosenthal Act, which was passed in 1977 to place reasonable limits on the kinds of activities that creditors and debt collectors can employ when collecting payments from consumers. The Rosenthal Act, like the FDCPA, prohibits deceptive, dishonest, unfair and unreasonable debt collection practices, and many of the law's provisions govern how debt collectors can interact and communicate with consumers. The law also provides a private right of action for harmed consumers.
- The Fair Debt Buying Practices Act. The Legislature passed the Fair Debt Buying Practices Act in 2013 to provide protections to consumers whose debts were sold to a debt buyer. It requires a person who buys delinquent or charged-off consumer debt to maintain certain documentation and require a debt buyer to provide disclosures to consumers when the buyer attempts to collect debts that are beyond the applicable statute of limitations. While the Fair Debt Buying Practices Act applies only to instances when the transfer of collection is structured as a sale, it also contains stronger validation requirements than the Rosenthal Act and the federal Fair Debt Collections Practices Act.
- Debt Collection Licensing Act (DCLA). SB 908 (Wieckowski), Chapter 163, Statutes of 2020, establishes a program within the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) to license and oversee debt collectors and debt buyers in California. While this licensing program does not add significant new requirements for these entities, the new licensing program adds a layer of regulatory oversight over them. Under the DCLA, a debt collector and debt buyer must obtain a license and must comply with both the Rosenthal Act and Fair Debt Buying Practices Act. A licensee must pay an annual fee and requires DFPI to examine a licensees for compliance.
Background: Commercial debt collectors
The myriad of federal and state statutes aimed at protecting consumers from debt collection harms do not apply to business debt. Generally, it is assumed that unlike a consumer, a business is more sophisticated and has greater means to evaluate commercial credit options and their associated risks. However, this assumption has started to weaken as policymakers and advocates scrutinize commercial debt collection practices.
In 2022, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau flagged small business debt collection issues stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic. The agency noted that a level of resources and expertise for most small businesses on par with consumer borrowers rather than what may be the general perception of commercial enterprises with readily available financial resources and expertise. The result is the potential for exploitation comparative to what is encountered by consumers, without any of the protections granted to consumers by the FDCPA:
Congress has also explored this issue. In 2022, Rep. Lawson introduced H.R. 6814, titled the Small Business Fair Debt Collection Act, to extend FDCPA protections to small businesses with loans or obligations less than $2.5 million. Writing in support of the measure, Small Business Majority argued that "While consumer borrowers are covered by FDCPA, small business borrowers are not. This is particularly concerning because many small business owners often use their personal finances to start and expand their businesses and will apply for credit using their personal credit, but they don't receive the same protections as individual consumers."
For its part, commercial debt collection industry actors make a case that responsible collectors do not engage in many of the activities barred by the FDCPA or the Rosenthal Act. For example, the Commercial Collection Agencies of America and the International Association of Commercial Collectors each publish a "Code of Ethics" with conduct rules that members must follow. Examples of prohibited behavior include making false statements, threatening debtors or their vendors, and making harassing phone calls.
What does this bill do?
SB 1286 extends Rosenthal Act protections to certain types of commercial debt. Specifically, Rosenthal Act would apply to money or property due or owing or alleged to be due by reason of a "covered commercial transaction," which is a transaction that is $500,000 or less and acquired for a reason other than personal, family, or household purposes. Moreover, a debtor as it applies to a commercial debt must be a natural person and includes a natural person who guarantees an obligation related to a commercial credit transaction. Recent author amendments further narrow the application of the Rosenthal Act to instances when the aggregate amount of all commercial credit transactions due to the same lender, financing provider, or debt buyer is $500,000 or less.
According to the sponsors, the above parameters mean that SB 1286 will extend Rosenthal Act to two situations: (1) When a person takes out a personal loan in their own name for the business; and (2) When a person co-signs a loan taken out in the business's name.
According to the Author
"Small businesses face many barriers in accessing capital, especially minority-owned businesses. Since the economic crash and Great Recession in 2008, many lenders have moved to require small business owners to personally guarantee their business debt. While lenders are within their right to require co-signatories, this goes against the purpose of entity formation. Although the individual is borrowing for their business, the personal guarantee exposes the individual to abusive, deceptive, or unfair debt collection practices. SB 1286 will extend the debt collection protections provided under the Rosenthal Act to individuals who have a personal guarantee on their business debt."
Arguments in Support
Arguments in Opposition
A coalition of organizations representing lenders and creditors, including the American Financial Services Association, California Bankers Association, California Creditors Bar Association, and the California Financial Services Associations, oppose SB 1286. Their letter starts:
"As amended, SB 1286 attempts to insert commercial debts into the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (the Act), a section of law that specifically contemplates nuances with individual consumers, not businesses. The Act contains some commonsense prohibitions on behavior that is deceptive or unreasonable, including prohibiting the use or threat of physical violence, using profane language, and threats that rely on false representations. The Act also contains provisions that are specific to individual consumers, such as prohibition of contacting a debtor's employer or restrictions on the jurisdiction of judicial proceedings, which make sense for individual consumers but do not comport in business commercial transactions."
FISCAL COMMENTS
According to Assembly Appropriations Committee:
- Minor and absorbable costs to the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) to update manuals, examinations, and procedures. DFPI does not license debt collectors, but does license lenders and has the authority to oversee other consumer financial products or services through the California Consumer Financial Protection Law.
- Annual cost pressures (General Fund (GF) or Trial Court Trust Fund (TCTF)) of an unknown amount, potentially up to $150,000, to the courts in additional workload by expanding application of the Rosenthal Act, including the existing private right of action for harmed consumers, to covered commercial debt. It is unclear how many civil actions may be filed statewide, but the estimated workload cost of one hour of court time is $1,000. Although courts are not funded on the basis of workload, increased pressure on staff and the TCTF may create a need for increased court funding from the GF to perform existing duties. The Budget Act of 2024 includes $37.3 million ongoing GF to backfill declining TCTF revenue.
VOTES
SENATE FLOOR: 28-9-3
YES: Archuleta, Ashby, Atkins, Becker, Blakespear, Caballero, Cortese, Dodd, Durazo, Eggman, Glazer, Gonzalez, Hurtado, Laird, Limón, McGuire, Menjivar, Min, Newman, Padilla, Portantino, Rubio, Skinner, Smallwood-Cuevas, Stern, Umberg, Wahab, Wiener
NO: Alvarado-Gil, Dahle, Grove, Jones, Nguyen, Niello, Ochoa Bogh, Seyarto, Wilk
ABS, ABST OR NV: Allen, Bradford, Roth
ASM BANKING AND FINANCE: 6-2-1
YES: Grayson, Kalra, Mike Fong, Maienschein, Petrie-Norris, Blanca Rubio
NO: Chen, Dixon
ABS, ABST OR NV: Soria
ASM JUDICIARY: 9-2-1
YES: Kalra, Bauer-Kahan, Bryan, Connolly, Haney, Maienschein, McKinnor, Pacheco, Reyes
NO: Dixon, Joe Patterson
ABS, ABST OR NV: Sanchez
ASM APPROPRIATIONS: 11-3-1
YES: Wicks, Arambula, Bryan, Calderon, Wendy Carrillo, Mike Fong, Grayson, Haney, Hart, Pellerin, Villapudua
NO: Sanchez, Dixon, Ta
ABS, ABST OR NV: Jim Patterson
UPDATED
VERSION: August 23, 2024
CONSULTANT: Luke Reidenbach / B. & F. / (916) 319-3081 FN: 0004549
SENATE THIRD READING
STR Bill Id:SB 1286
Author:(Min)
As Amended Ver:July 3, 2024
Majority vote
SUMMARY
Expands the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Rosenthal Act) to cover commercial debts owed by certain debtors.
Major Provisions
- Defines "covered commercial debt" as money, property, or their equivalent due from a natural person to a lender, commercial financing provider, or a debt buyer, resulting from a covered commercial credit transaction valued at $500,000 or less.
- Applies specified Rosenthal Act provisions to delinquent covered commercial debt. The existing requirement for a debt collector to provide the debtor with a specified statement applies to delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned only on or after July 1, 2025.
- Authorizes a debt collector to collect covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025, through a judicial proceeding in the county in which the non-natural person that incurred the debt is located.
COMMENTS
Background: Protections related to the collection of consumer debt
An assortment of federal and state laws establish consumer protections related to debt collection and debt purchasing. These laws generally do not cover commercial debt. These consumer-centered statutes include:
- The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). In 1977, the federal government established the FDCPA to prohibit debt collectors from engaging in abusive, unfair or deceptive practices to collect debts. Violations of the FDCPA are enforceable through a private right of action or a class action, or through administrative action. Under the FDCPA, a debt collector must send a debtor written validation letters containing information such as the amount of debt and the name of the creditor to whom the debt is owed.
- The Rosenthal Act. This bill amends the Rosenthal Act, which was passed in 1977 to place reasonable limits on the kinds of activities that creditors and debt collectors can employ when collecting payments from consumers. The Rosenthal Act, like the FDCPA, prohibits deceptive, dishonest, unfair and unreasonable debt collection practices, and many of the law's provisions govern how debt collectors can interact and communicate with consumers. The law also provides a private right of action for harmed consumers.
- The Fair Debt Buying Practices Act. The Legislature passed the Fair Debt Buying Practices Act in 2013 to provide protections to consumers whose debts were sold to a debt buyer. It requires a person who buys delinquent or charged-off consumer debt to maintain certain documentation and require a debt buyer to provide disclosures to consumers when the buyer attempts to collect debts that are beyond the applicable statute of limitations. While the Fair Debt Buying Practices Act applies only to instances when the transfer of collection is structured as a sale, it also contains stronger validation requirements than the Rosenthal Act and the federal Fair Debt Collections Practices Act.
- Debt Collection Licensing Act (DCLA). SB 908 (Wieckowski), Chapter 163, Statutes of 2020, establishes a program within the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) to license and oversee debt collectors and debt buyers in California. While this licensing program does not add significant new requirements for these entities, the new licensing program adds a layer of regulatory oversight over them. Under the DCLA, a debt collector and debt buyer must obtain a license and must comply with both the Rosenthal Act and Fair Debt Buying Practices Act. A licensee must pay an annual fee and requires DFPI to examine a licensees for compliance.
Background: Commercial debt collectors
The myriad of federal and state statutes aimed at protecting consumers from debt collection harms do not apply to business debt. Generally, it is assumed that unlike a consumer, a business is more sophisticated and has greater means to evaluate commercial credit options and their associated risks. However, this assumption has started to weaken as policymakers and advocates scrutinize commercial debt collection practices.
In 2022, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau flagged small business debt collection issues stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic. The agency noted that a level of resources and expertise for most small businesses on par with consumer borrowers rather than what may be the general perception of commercial enterprises with readily available financial resources and expertise. The result is the potential for exploitation comparative to what is encountered by consumers, without any of the protections granted to consumers by the FDCPA:
Congress has also explored this issue. In 2022, Rep. Lawson introduced H.R. 6814, titled the Small Business Fair Debt Collection Act, to extend FDCPA protections to small businesses with loans or obligations less than $2.5 million. Writing in support of the measure, Small Business Majority argued that "While consumer borrowers are covered by FDCPA, small business borrowers are not. This is particularly concerning because many small business owners often use their personal finances to start and expand their businesses and will apply for credit using their personal credit, but they don’t receive the same protections as individual consumers."
For its part, commercial debt collection industry actors make a case that responsible collectors do not engage in many of the activities barred by the FDCPA or the Rosenthal Act. For example, the Commercial Collection Agencies of America and the International Association of Commercial Collectors each publish a "Code of Ethics" with conduct rules that members must follow. Examples of prohibited behavior include making false statements, threatening debtors or their vendors, and making harassing phone calls.[1]
What does this bill do?
SB 1286 extends Rosenthal Act protections to certain types of commercial debt. Specifically, Rosenthal Act would apply to money or property due or owing or alleged to be due by reason of a “covered commercial transaction,” which is a transaction that is $500,000 or less and acquired for a reason other than personal, family, or household purposes. Moreover, a debtor as it applies to a commercial debt must be a natural person and includes a natural person who guarantees an obligation related to a commercial credit transaction.
According to the sponsors, the above parameters mean that SB 1286 will extend Rosenthal Act to two situations: (1) When a person takes out a personal loan in their own name for the business; and (2) When a person co-signs a loan taken out in the business’s name.
According to the Author
According to the author:
"Small businesses face many barriers in accessing capital, especially minority-owned businesses. Since the economic crash and Great Recession in 2008, many lenders have moved to require small business owners to personally guarantee their business debt. While lenders are within their right to require co-signatories, this goes against the purpose of entity formation. Although the individual is borrowing for their business, the personal guarantee exposes the individual to abusive, deceptive, or unfair debt collection practices. SB 1286 will extend the debt collection protections provided under the Rosenthal Act to individuals who have a personal guarantee on their business debt."
Arguments in Support
A coalition of organizations representing consumers and small businesses, including the East Bay Community Law Center, Small Business Majority, California Low-income Consumer Coalition, and the Consumer Federation of California, argue in support of this bill. Their coalition letter states:
"Since the 2008 Great Recession, many lenders started requiring business owners to personally sign for their business debt. Lenders are within their right to require co-signatories, however a personal guarantee defeats the purpose of an LLC, and it is antithetical to the purpose of entity formation…. Given the lack of access to traditional business funding and the current trend of requiring personal guarantees, the need for dignified debt collection practices for individuals who incur debt for their business is necessary as small businesses do not have the same protections as consumers in the collection of a business debt."
Arguments in Opposition
A coalition of organizations representing lenders and creditors, including the American Financial Services Association, California Bankers Association, California Creditors Bar Association, and the California Financial Services Associations, oppose SB 1286. Their letter starts:
"As amended, SB 1286 attempts to insert commercial debts into the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (the Act), a section of law that specifically contemplates nuances with individual consumers, not businesses. The Act contains some commonsense prohibitions on behavior that is deceptive or unreasonable, including prohibiting the use or threat of physical violence, using profane language, and threats that rely on false representations. The Act also contains provisions that are specific to individual consumers, such as prohibition of contacting a debtor's employer or restrictions on the jurisdiction of judicial proceedings, which make sense for individual consumers but do not comport in business commercial transactions."
FISCAL COMMENTS
According to Assembly Appropriations Committee:
- Minor and absorbable costs to the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) to update manuals, examinations, and procedures. DFPI does not license debt collectors, but does license lenders and has the authority to oversee other consumer financial products or services through the California Consumer Financial Protection Law.
- Annual cost pressures (General Fund (GF) or Trial Court Trust Fund (TCTF)) of an unknown amount, potentially up to $150,000, to the courts in additional workload by expanding application of the Rosenthal Act, including the existing private right of action for harmed consumers, to covered commercial debt. It is unclear how many civil actions may be filed statewide, but the estimated workload cost of one hour of court time is $1,000. Although courts are not funded on the basis of workload, increased pressure on staff and the TCTF may create a need for increased court funding from the GF to perform existing duties. The Budget Act of 2024 includes $37.3 million ongoing GF to backfill declining TCTF revenue.
VOTES
SENATE FLOOR: 28-9-3
YES: Archuleta, Ashby, Atkins, Becker, Blakespear, Caballero, Cortese, Dodd, Durazo, Eggman, Glazer, Gonzalez, Hurtado, Laird, Limón, McGuire, Menjivar, Min, Newman, Padilla, Portantino, Rubio, Skinner, Smallwood-Cuevas, Stern, Umberg, Wahab, Wiener
NO: Alvarado-Gil, Dahle, Grove, Jones, Nguyen, Niello, Ochoa Bogh, Seyarto, Wilk
ABS, ABST OR NV: Allen, Bradford, Roth
ASM BANKING AND FINANCE: 6-2-1
YES: Grayson, Kalra, Mike Fong, Maienschein, Petrie-Norris, Blanca Rubio
NO: Chen, Dixon
ABS, ABST OR NV: Soria
ASM JUDICIARY: 9-2-1
YES: Kalra, Bauer-Kahan, Bryan, Connolly, Haney, Maienschein, McKinnor, Pacheco, Reyes
NO: Dixon, Joe Patterson
ABS, ABST OR NV: Sanchez
ASM APPROPRIATIONS: 11-3-1
YES: Wicks, Arambula, Bryan, Calderon, Wendy Carrillo, Mike Fong, Grayson, Haney, Hart, Pellerin, Villapudua
NO: Sanchez, Dixon, Ta
ABS, ABST OR NV: Jim Patterson
UPDATED
VERSION: July 3, 2024
CONSULTANT: Luke Reidenbach / B. & F. / (916) 319-3081 FN: 0003945
https://www.commercialcollector.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/code-of-ethics.pdf ↑
Date of Hearing: August 7, 2024
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Buffy Wicks, Chair
SBPCA Bill Id:SB 1286
Author:(Min) – As Amended Ver:July 3, 2024
Policy Committee: | Banking and Finance | Vote: | 6 - 2 |
Judiciary | 9 - 2 | ||
|
|
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY:
This bill expands the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Rosenthal Act) to cover commercial debts owed by certain debtors.
Specifically, this bill:
- Defines “covered commercial debt” as money, property, or their equivalent due from a natural person to a lender, commercial financing provider, or a debt buyer, resulting from a covered commercial credit transaction valued at $500,000 or less.
- Applies the Rosenthal Act to all delinquent covered commercial debt. The existing requirement for a debt collector to provide the debtor with a specified statement applies to delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned only on or after July 1, 2025.
- Authorizes a debt collector to collect covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025, through a judicial proceeding in the county in which the non-natural person that incurred the debt is located.
FISCAL EFFECT:
- Minor and absorbable costs to the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) to update manuals, examinations, and procedures. DFPI does not license debt collectors, but does license lenders and has the authority to oversee other consumer financial products or services through the California Consumer Financial Protection Law.
- Annual cost pressures (General Fund (GF) or Trial Court Trust Fund (TCTF)) of an unknown amount, potentially up to $150,000, to the courts in additional workload by expanding application of the Rosenthal Act, including the existing private right of action for harmed consumers, to covered commercial debt. It is unclear how many civil actions may be filed statewide, but the estimated workload cost of one hour of court time is $1,000. Although courts are not funded on the basis of workload, increased pressure on staff and the TCTF may create a need for increased court funding from the GF to perform existing duties. The Budget Act of 2024 includes $37.3 million ongoing GF to backfill declining TCTF revenue.
According to the Legislative Analyst’s Office, the GF faces a structural deficit in the tens of billions of dollars over the next several fiscal years.
COMMENTS:
- Purpose. According to the author:
[M]any lenders have moved to require small business owners to personally guarantee their business debt. While lenders are within their right to require co-signatories, this goes against the purpose of entity formation. Although the individual is borrowing for their business, the personal guarantee exposes the individual to abusive, deceptive, or unfair debt collection practices. SB 1286 will extend the debt collection protections provided under the Rosenthal Act to individuals who have a personal guarantee on their business debt.
- Support and Opposition. This bill is supported by a coalition of consumer and small business groups, including the Consumer Attorneys of California and Small Business Majority, which argues, “Given the lack of access to traditional business funding and the current trend of requiring personal guarantees, the need for dignified debt collection practices for individuals who incur debt for their business is necessary as small businesses do not have the same protections as consumers.”
This bill is opposed by a coalition of lending groups, led by the California Bankers Association, which argues this bill “does not attempt to regulate the small business lending practices of non-traditional lenders nor is it narrowly tailored to microbusinesses – but does impede the ability of a traditional lender to collect and be made whole on a substantive commercial loan.”
- Rosenthal Act. The Rosenthal Act places limits on the types of activities that a creditor and debt collector may utilize when collecting payments from consumers, and prohibits deceptive, harassing, humiliating, threatening, and other unreasonable debt collection practices. However, the myriad of federal and state laws enacted to protect consumers from debt collection practices do not apply to business debt, as it is assumed a business is more sophisticated and has greater means to evaluate commercial credit options and risks. This bill extends Rosenthal Act protections to debt owed by a natural person, acquired for a reason other than personal, family, or household purposes, due to a transaction of $500,000 or less. The author intends this bill to apply in situations when: (a) a person takes out a personal loan in their own name for their business and (b) a person co-signs a loan taken out in their business’s name. This bill would not forgive or invalidate any debt.
Analysis Prepared by: Irene Ho / APPR. / (916) 319-2081
Date of Hearing: July 2, 2024
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
Ash Kalra, Chair
SBPCA Bill Id:SB 1286
Author:(Min) – As Amended Ver:April 25, 2024
As Proposed to be Amended
SENATE VOTE: 28-9
SUBJECT: Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: covered debt: commercial debts
KEY ISSUE: SHOULD THE SCOPE OF THE ROSENTHAL FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT BE EXPANDED TO COVER SPECIFIED COMMERCIAL DEBT by PROVIDING CERTAIN NATURAL PERSON DEBTORS WITH PROTECTIONS AFFORDED BY THAT ACT?
SYNOPSIS
The Legislature has long recognized the importance of protecting consumers from unscrupulous and harassing debt collection practices. In 1977, the Legislature adopted the Rosenthal Act, which prohibits creditors from engaging in deceptive, harassing, humiliating, threatening, or otherwise unreasonable conduct while seeking payment for consumer debt. Under existing law, such protections are not afforded to individuals who owe business or commercial debt. In many cases, when someone applies for a business loan, the lender will ask them to provide a personal guarantee. This means they are personally responsible for repaying the loan if the business defaults. Their home, savings, and other valuable assets may be seized and sold by the lender in the event of total loan default. However, if their credit score is poor, or they lack sufficient collateral to support the loan, co-signers (who also become personally responsible for repaying the loan in the event of default) might be needed. According to the sponsors of this measure, the practice of requiring personal guaranties and co-signers for small business loans has increased since the 2008 Great Recession. These individuals are personally guaranteeing business loans—without any of the same protections as individuals taking out consumer loans. The author brings this measure to right this imbalance. This bill would extend the Rosenthal Act protections to individuals who owe “covered commercial debt”—meaning a debt arising from a $500,000 or less transaction for use primarily other than personal, family, or household purposes. This bill would not forgive or invalidate any debt, it would just extend many of the same protections against harassment for individual debtors who owe consumer debts to those who owe commercial debts. In response to concerns that the existing Rosenthal Act framework for consumer debt does not comport with commercial loans, the author is proposing several amendments discussed throughout and incorporated into the SUMMARY below. This measure is co-sponsored by the East Bay Community Law Center, the Consumer Federation of California, CAMEO, and the Small Business Majority, and is broadly supported by consumer advocates and public interest organizations. It is opposed by a broad coalition of business and banking organizations, including the Chamber of Commerce and the California Bankers Association. Collection groups, such as the California Association of Collectors oppose this measure unless amended. The author’s proposed amendments appear to resolve some, but not all, of their concerns. This measure will be heard in the Assembly Banking & Finance Committee on July 1, and in the event of its successful passage out of that committee, will be heard in this Committee.
SUMMARY: Expands the scope of the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Rosenthal Act) to cover specified commercial debt, providing certain debtors with protections from harassment and other prohibited collections activities. Specifically, this bill:
- Declares that the purpose of the Rosenthal Act includes prohibiting debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of small business debts.
- Defines “covered debt” as a consumer debt or a covered commercial debt.
- Defines “covered credit” as consumer credit or covered commercial credit.
- Defines “covered commercial debt” and “covered commercial credit” as money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person to a lender, a commercial financing provider, or a debt buyer, by reason of a covered commercial credit transaction.
- Defines “covered commercial credit transaction” as a transaction between a person and another person in which property, services, or money of a total value of no more than $500,000 is acquired on credit by that person from the other person for use primarily for other than personal, family, or household purposes.
- Defines “debtor” as a natural person whom a debt collector seeks to collect a covered debt that is due and owing or alleged to be due and owing from that person.
- Establishes that in relation a covered commercial debt or credit, a “debtor” means a natural person who guarantees an obligation related to a covered commercial credit transaction.
- Replaces “consumer debt” with “covered debt” throughout much of the Rosenthal Act, except for certain provisions, including those related to consumer debt originated by a hospital, and provisions prohibiting calling a debtor’s employer or their family member.
- Provides that when there is more than one debtor on a given commercial loan, a debt collector may collect or attempt to collect the debt by means of a judicial proceeding in the county in which the business, for whose purpose the debt was incurred, is located.
- Applies the provisions relating to proper venue in 9) and the statement required to be provided by the debt collector to the debtor only for delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
EXISTING LAW:
- Regulates the collection of consumer debt under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, which generally prohibits deceptive, dishonest, unfair, and unreasonable debt collection practices by debt collectors and regulates the form and content of communications by debt collectors to debtors and others. (Civil Code Section 1788 et seq. All further statutory references are to the Civil Code, unless otherwise specified.)
- Defines the following terms:
- “Consumer debt” and “consumer credit” means money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person by reason of a consumer credit transaction. The term “consumer debt” includes a mortgage debt.
- “Consumer credit transaction” means a transaction between a natural person and another person in which property, services, or money is acquired on credit by that natural person from the other person primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
- “Debt collector” means any person who, in the ordinary course of business, regularly, on behalf of that person or others, engages in debt collection.
- “Debt collection” means any act or practice in connection with the collection of consumer debts. (Section 1788.2.)
- Prohibits a debt collector from the following conducts or practices, among others, when collecting or attempting to collect a consumer debt:
- The use or threat of physical force or violence. (Section 1788.10.)
- Threats and communications that rely on false representations. (Section 1788.10 and 1788.13.)
- Using obscene or profane language. (Section 1788.11.)
- Communicating with the debtor with such frequency as to be unreasonable, and to constitute harassment of the debtor under the circumstances. (Section 1788.11.)
- Communicating unnecessarily about the debtor’s debt with the debtor’s employer or extended family. (Section 1788.12.)
- Requires a debt collector to provide its California debt collector license number to a consumer in specified circumstances. (Section 1788.11.)
- Incorporates by reference specified provisions of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act into state law. (Section 1788.17.)
- Provides remedies to a harmed debtor in an amount equal to any actual damages sustained by the debtor as a result of violation, plus an amount of $100 - $1,000 if the violation was conducted willfully and knowingly by the debt collector. (Section 1788.30.)
- Provides a release from liability to a debt collector who cures a violation, as specified, or who shows by a preponderance of evidence that the violation was not intentional and resulted notwithstanding the maintenance of procedures reasonably adapted to avoid any such violation. (Section 1788.30.)
- Prohibits a debt collector from collecting or attempting to collect consumer debt through a judicial proceeding when they know that service has not been legally effected. (Section 1788.15 (a).)
- Prohibits a debt collector from collecting or attempting to collect a consumer debt through a judicial proceeding in a county other than a county in which the debtor has incurred the debt, the county in which the debtor resides at the time the proceedings are instituted, or where the debtor resided when the debt was incurred. (Section 1788.15 (b).)
- Provides the Debt Collection Licensing Act (DCLA) that prohibits a person from engaging in the business of the collection of consumer debt without a license and requires the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation to administer the licensing program. (Financial Code Section 100000 et seq.)
FISCAL EFFECT: As currently in print this bill is keyed fiscal.
COMMENTS: The Legislature has long recognized the importance of protecting consumers from unscrupulous and harassing debt collection practices. In 1977, the Legislature adopted the Rosenthal Act, which prohibits creditors from engaging in deceptive, harassing, humiliating, threatening, or otherwise unreasonable conduct while seeking payment for consumer debt. Under existing law, such protections are not afforded to individuals who owe business or commercial debt. In many cases, when someone applies for a business loan, the lender will ask them to provide a personal guarantee. This means they are personally responsible for repaying the loan if the business defaults. Their home, savings and other valuable assets may be seized and sold by the lender in the event of total loan default. However, if their credit score is poor, or they lack sufficient collateral to support the loan, co-signers (who also become personally responsible for repaying the loan in the event of default) might be needed. According to the sponsors of this measure, the practice of requiring personal guaranties and co-signers for small business loans has increased since the 2008 Great Recession. These individuals are personally guaranteeing business loans—without any of the same protections as individuals taking out consumer loans. The author brings this measure to right that wrong. This bill would extend the Rosenthal Act protections to individuals who owe “covered commercial debt”—meaning a debt arising from a $500,000 or less transaction for use primarily other than personal, family, or household purposes. This bill would not forgive or invalidate any debt, it would just extend many of the same protections against harassment for individual debtors who owe consumer debts to those who owe commercial debts. The author explains why the protections for debt collection of consumer debts should be extended to individuals who owe certain commercial debts:
Small businesses face many barriers in accessing capital, especially minority-owned businesses. Since the economic crash and Great Recession in 2008, many lenders have moved to require small business owners to personally guarantee their business debt. While lenders are within their right to require co-signatories, this goes against the purpose of entity formation. Although the individual is borrowing for their business, the personal guarantee exposes the individual to abusive, deceptive, or unfair debt collection practices. SB 1286 will extend the debt collection protections provided under the Rosenthal Act to individuals who have a personal guarantee on their business debt.
Existing laws related to collection of consumer debt. Debt collection protections for consumer debts are essential safeguards aimed at ensuring fair treatment and prevent abuse by debt collectors. Over the past half-century, both the state and federal government have passed an assortment of consumer protection laws related to debt collection. The Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance’s analysis of this measure detail the different acts and their key terms:
- The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). In 1977, the federal government established the FDCPA to prohibit debt collectors from engaging in abusive, unfair or deceptive practices to collect debts. Violations of the FDCPA are enforceable through a private right of action or a class action, or through administrative action. Under the FDCPA, a debt collector must send a debtor written validation letters containing information such as the amount of debt and the name of the creditor to whom the debt is owed.
- The Rosenthal Act. This bill amends the Rosenthal Act, which was passed in 1977 to place reasonable limits on the kinds of activities that creditors and debt collectors can employ when collecting payments from consumers. The Rosenthal Act, like the FDCPA, prohibits deceptive, dishonest, unfair and unreasonable debt collection practices, and many of the law’s provisions govern how debt collectors can interact and communicate with consumers. The law also provides a private right of action for harmed consumers.
- The Fair Debt Buying Practices Act. The Legislature passed the Fair Debt Buying Practices Act in 2013 (SB 233 (Leno) Chap. 64, Stats. 2013) to provide protections to consumers whose debts were sold to a debt buyer. It requires a person who buys delinquent or charged-off consumer debt to maintain certain documentation and require a debt buyer to provide disclosures to consumers when the buyer attempts to collect debts that are beyond the applicable statute of limitations. While the Fair Debt Buying Practices Act applies only to instances when the transfer of collection is structured as a sale, it also contains stronger validation requirements than the Rosenthal Act and the federal Fair Debt Collections Practices Act.
- Debt Collection Licensing Act (DCLA). SB 908 (Wieckowski), Chap. 163, Stats. 2020, establishes a program within the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) to license and oversee debt collectors and debt buyers in California. While this licensing program does not add significant new requirements for these entities, the new licensing program adds a layer of regulatory oversight over them. Under the DCLA, a debt collector and debt buyer must obtain a license and must comply with both the Rosenthal Act and Fair Debt Buying Practices Act. A licensee must pay an annual fee and requires DFPI to examine a licensee for compliance.
Why is this bill needed? Small business owners employ roughly half of California’s private-sector workforce, and minority-owned small businesses support 2.56 million jobs annually across California. (California Office of the Small Business Advocate, State of Diverse Small Business in California (June 2023), available at https://calosba.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/The-State-of-Diverse-Small-Businesses-in-California_Executive-Summary.pdf.) In many cases, when a small business applies for a business loan, the lender will ask an individual to provide a personal guarantee. This means they are personally responsible for repaying the loan if the business defaults. Their home, savings and other valuable assets may be seized and sold by the lender in the event of total loan default. However, if their credit score is poor, or they lack sufficient collateral to support the loan, a personal guarantee may not be enough, and co-signers (who also become personally responsible for repaying the loan in the event of default) might be needed. According to the sponsors of this measure, the practice of requiring personal guaranties and co-signers for small business loans has increased since the 2008 Great Recession. Individuals are personally guaranteeing business loans—without any of the same protections as individuals taking out consumer loans. Proponents of this measure claim that small businesses are experiencing difficulties from unscrupulous non-traditional lenders that are engaging in predatory lending practices. The author brings this measure to correct that wrong by extending long-enshrined debt collection protections to individuals who have business debt.
What type of debt does this bill cover? SB 1286 extends Rosenthal Act protections to certain types of commercial debt. Specifically, Rosenthal Act would apply to money or property due or owing or alleged to be due by reason of a “covered commercial transaction,” which is a transaction that is $500,000 or more and acquired for a reason other than personal, family, or household purposes.
Whom does this bill cover? This bill—and the Rosenthal Act protections it provides—applies only to natural persons (i.e., living, breathing humans) who guarantee an obligation related to a covered commercial transaction. According to the sponsors, the above parameters mean that SB 1286 will extend Rosenthal Act to two situations: (1) When a person takes out a personal loan in their own name for the business; and (2) When a person co-signs a loan taken out in the business’s name. The author and sponsors are trying to thread the needle between a natural person who incurs a commercial debt (who would be covered by this act) and a non-natural person (i.e., business) that incurs a commercial debt (which would not).
Opposition raises concerns that many of the Rosenthal Act protections for collection of consumer debt do not comport with collection of business debts. The overarching argument raised by the opposition is that the consumer debt is different from business debt, and applying the same framework to both is fundamentally flawed. But the focus of this measure is not necessarily on the debt, but on the debtor—SB 1286 extends certain Rosenthal Act protections only to individuals who are personal guarantors of business debts—not to businesses themselves. The author has amended this measure, and is further amending this bill, as discussed below and in the Author’s Amendments to address concerns that certain provisions simply cannot work for business debt.
Prohibitions on contacting family members of debtor. The Rosenthal Act prohibits communicating information regarding debt to a debtor’s family member. (Civil Code Section 1788.12 (b).) Collection industry representatives argue that the prohibition against a collector contacting a debtor’s family member is incompatible with commercial debt because it is common for family members to work in the business. To address these concerns, Author’s Amendment # 3 clarifies that this prohibition on contacting family members applies only to collection of consumer loans.
Prohibitions on “deadbeat” lists and public shaming. The Rosenthal Act prohibits communicating to any person any list of debtors that discloses the nature or existence of a consumer debt, also referred to as “deadbeat lists,” except for reports to a consumer reporting agency. (Civil Code Section 1788.12 (c).) Opponents argue that these limitations, if applied to commercial debt, calls into question the ways that commercial lenders help determine the creditworthiness of business borrowers. Commercial lenders use databases or “business bureaus” run by private firms, and the Rosenthal Act’s allowance for reporting consumer credit agencies does not apply to these types of companies. Businesses, unlike individuals, do not have a FICO score, making it impossible for a lender to evaluate the creditworthiness of a small business. Opposition likewise point to the prohibition against written communication with the debtor that displays or conveys information about a commercial debt could prohibit sending invoices to the accounts receivables department. (See Civil Code Section 1788.12 (c).) Sponsors of this measure dismiss both arguments, arguing that sending a written invoice to the business would not violate the bill, not only because its intent is likely not “to embarrass” and therefore is not triggered under this Act. And the prohibition on deadbeat lists would not affect a lender’s ability to determine creditworthiness. The business itself, to the extent it defaulted on a loan, could still show up in databases containing such information. And where the individual defaults on a business loan, the current practice of reporting that individual’s default to a credit reporting agency would remain unchanged. Thus, a lender could access the necessary information to determine creditworthiness, but without publicly shaming the individual debtor in the process.
The author acknowledges that in the scenario where the business debt is taken out by a sole proprietor or a general partnership, there is no distinction between the business and the proprietor/general partner. Thus, the prohibitions imposed by this bill would apply in equal force to sole proprietorships and general partnerships (because those are, by definition, the same—with the same liabilities and obligations—as the natural person).
Forum selection/venue. The Rosenthal Act prescribes proper venue for filing a judicial proceeding to collect consumer debt. Specifically, the Act limits proper venue to one of three possible counties: 1) the county in which the debtor has incurred the consumer debt; 2) the county in which the debtor resides at the time the debt collection lawsuit is filed; or 3) the county where the debtor resided at the time the debt was incurred. (Civil Code Section 1788.15 (b).) This venue provision was adopted to curtail the abusive practice of creditors filing suit in a distant venue—whether through a contractual forum selection clause or otherwise. While not as blatantly offensive as some of the direct harassment methods that were employed by unethical debt collectors, the practice of distant forum abuse is more insidious. As described by a law review article near the time of the implementation of the FDCPA explains:
[The practice of distant forum abuse] engages an ostensibly legitimate legal process to deprive consumers of basic opportunities which should be afforded all litigants, thus defying basic notions of due process in a very realistic sense. When a consumer, whether or not she has a valid defense, finds that the cost of hiring legal counsel, the expenses incurred in traveling to a distant court, the lost income from work days spent in court or out on other matters related to litigation and the tremendous inconvenience involved in appearing and defending, greatly outweigh the amount in controversy, the choice becomes a foregone conclusion. At best it is fundamentally unfair; at worst it is oppressive.
(See generally Chen, Due Process As Consumer Protection: State Remedies For Distant Forum Abuse (1986) 20 Akron L.Rev. 9, 15, available at https://core.ac.uk/reader/232684290.)
The policy rationale for prohibiting distant forum abuse against individual debtors of consumer debt applies to individual debtors of commercial debt as well.
Opponents of the measure raise practical concerns with extending this venue provision to commercial debt. They state that “there will often be guarantors or borrowers for the same loan that are located in different counties. It is unclear how SB 1286 would work when there are debtors or other obligors residing in different counties or when the collateral is located in a different county.” In order to assuage concerns over the need for multiple lawsuits with possible conflicting judgments to recover the same debt, the Author’s Amendment #6 widen the venue options for collectors in commercial debt matters while maintaining the rationale behind the need for protection against distant forum abuse with natural person business debtors. In the event of a conflict in jurisdiction between a natural person guarantor and business entity, the county in which the business entity is located would also be allowed. This ensures that the debtor has sufficient contacts with the location, while resolving any conflicts in the event of multiple debtors located in different counties. This amendment appears to address the practical problem raised by the opposition, but likely leaves their policy argument unresolved. They argue that it is inappropriate for the Legislature to impose a venue location in a commercial transaction involving two sophisticated parties. Proponents, on the other hand, view this intervention as necessary to balance uneven bargaining power and ensure that no debtor abuse is permitted—regardless of whether that individual owes a consumer or a commercial debt.
Author’s Amendments. In order to clarify the scope of SB 1286, make technical fixes, and respond to concerns raised by opposition, the author is proposing the following amendments.
Clarify that SB 1286 is not intended to create an additional licensing requirement for debt collectors.
Civil Code Section 1788.1(c) Nothing in this title is intended to create or impose an additional licensing requirement under Division 25 (commencing with Section 100000) of the Financial Code on a debt collector with respect to the collection of covered commercial debt or covered commercial credit.
2. Modify the definition of “debtor” to clarify that it extends only to natural persons.
1788.2(h)(2) In relation to a covered commercial debt, debt or covered commercial credit, a “debtor” includes shall mean a natural person who guarantees an obligation related to a covered commercial credit transaction.
(3) A “debtor” does not include a corporation or limited liability company.
3. Limit the prohibition on communicating information regarding debt to a debtor’s family member to consumer debt (i.e., creditors can still call family members of debtors regarding commercial debt).
1788.12(b) Communicating information regarding a covered consumer debt to any member of the debtor’s family, other than the debtor’s spouse or the parents or guardians of the debtor who is either a minor or who resides in the same household with that parent or guardian, prior to obtaining a judgment against the debtor, except where the purpose of the communication is to locate the debtor, or where the debtor or their attorney has consented in writing to that communication.
4. Make clarifying change to reflect that commercial debt collectors do not need a license.
1788.13(l) Any communication by a licensed collection agency to a debtor demanding money unless the claim is actually assigned to the collection agency.
- Fix an outdated reference to the California Private Protection Agency.
Section 1788.18(b)(1) A written statement that contains the content of the Identity Theft Victim’s Fraudulent Account Information Request offered to the public by the California Privacy Protection Agency Office of Privacy Protection.
- Update the venue provision to clarify that in the event of multiple individual borrowers, the lender can bring a claim in the county where the business for which the debt was incurred is located.
1788.15 (c) Notwithstanding subdivision (b), when the obligation of the debtor arises from a guaranty by the debtor of a covered commercial debt, a debt collector may collect or attempt to collect covered commercial debt by means of a judicial proceeding in the county in which the non-natural person for whose purpose the commercial debt was incurred is located.
(d) This section shall apply to all delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
- Clarify that the Debt Collector Licensing Act does not apply to commercial debt or covered commercial credit, as defined by this bill.
Financial Code Section 100001(c) This division shall not apply to debt collection regulated pursuant to Division 12.5 (commencing with Section 28100) or to the collection of covered commercial debt or covered commercial credit, as those terms are defined in Title 1.6C (commencing with Section 1788) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code.
- Make additional technical changes.
Civil Code Section 1788.22(a)(1): No such person shall attempt to consummate any consumer covered credit transaction or small business credit transaction thereunder knowing that credit privileges under the account have been terminated or suspended.
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: A coalition of co-sponsors and supporters, including the East Bay Community Law Center, the Consumer Federation of California, the Small Business Majority, and CAMEO, explain the need for SB 1286:
Since the 2008 Great Recession, many lenders started requiring business owners to personally sign for their business debt. Lenders are within their right to require co-signatories, however a personal guarantee defeats the purpose of an LLC, and is is antithetical to the purpose of entity formation.
These requirements only hurt minority entrepreneurship. Disparities in access to capital for minority-owned small businesses are well-documented, even if you control for factors like revenue. For instance, a study from Stanford found Latino-owned businesses had lower approval rates than white-owned businesses for loans of over $50,000, despite having larger revenues, similar credit scores, and less debt.
Small business owners employ roughly half of California’s private-sector workforce, and minority-owned small businesses support 2.56 million jobs annually across California. But an unregulated lending landscape only seeks to destroy California jobs. Over the past three years alone, the U.S. has seen a 43% increase in the level of business applications, with over 5 million business applications per year (before that, applications hovered around 3.5 million.) And minority-owned businesses have powered the historic post-pandemic small business boom.
…
Given the lack of access to traditional business funding and the current trend of requiring personal guarantees, the need for dignified debt collection practices for individuals who incur debt for their business is necessary as small businesses do not have the same protections as consumers in the collection of a business debt.
This bill is narrowly tailored to solve the specific issue—and only applies to individual people who incur a business debt. The rationale behind the Rosenthal Act is applicable to small business owners (the people behind the business): decency and informed debt collection practices. No abuse should be allowed in the collection of a small business debt.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: A coalition of financial services organizations, including the California Bankers Association and the California Community Banking Network oppose this measure, arguing that it does not solve the stated problem and instead proposes a multitude of compliance conundrums that create an unworkable framework, including the $500,000 threshold:
Critically, the $500,000 threshold in Section 1788.2(o) of covered commercial loans established in SB 1286 would cover even very sophisticated and complex loans; and the measure should be tailored to protect small businesses as the proponents claim it does. Loan relationships with commercial loan customers can be complex and contain several lines of credit that would be technically covered under the Act. For example, a borrower may have $10 million in loans with credit lines of varying amounts, including a line of credit for $200,000 – it would cause complications for both creditors and debts alike if different rules apply for some lines within that loan and not others. It is our understanding that this type of sophisticated borrower is not the intended recipient of these protections. As such, SB 1286 should establish a $100,000 maximum that can be owed to any one lender for these provisions to apply. In this context it is also worth noting that 1788.2(o) uses the term “value,” which is subjective and may be up for debate. To avoid uncertainty or conflict, the $100,000 threshold needs to be tied to the time of origination of the loan, which is clear and agreed upon by both parties.
Opposition raises additional practical concerns about incorporating this bill into the existing statutory framework regarding the collection of consumer debt:
[T]he [Rosenthal] Act is cross-referenced in many other areas of law, such as Health and Safety Code 12457 which establishes emergency doctor notification requirements when assigning debt and Family Code 5614 which requires private collectors for child support to abide by the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The unintended consequences that the measure may present are likely to be discovered through implementation of the new law, which is why we continue to suggest that the measure’s goal should be accomplished through the creation of a new code section, wherein stakeholders on both sides of the table would transpose the agreed-upon protections already established in the Act into a section of law specifically tailored to the covered commercial transactions that the proponents are attempting to impact. Establishing a new code section eliminates all potential issues with cross-references in other areas of law. There is serious concern that SB 1286 may be a cloaked attempt to affect statutory change elsewhere
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
Cameo - California Association for Micro Enterprise Opportunity (co-sponsor)
East Bay Community Law Center (co-sponsor)
Consumer Federation of California (co-sponsor)
Small Business Majority (co-sponsor)
Berkeley Law & Organizing Collective
Bet Tzedek Legal Services
California Coalition for Community Investment
California Low-income Consumer Coalition
California Low-income Consumer Federation
Consumer Attorneys of California
Decosimo Law
Housing and Economic Rights Advocates (HERA)
ICA
LA Cocina
Microenterprise Collaborative of Inland Southern California
Public Law Center
Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center
Responsible Business Lending Coalition
San Juan Capistrano Chamber of Commerce
Sonya Yruel Photography
The Lisa B Company
Opposition
American Financial Services Association
California Bankers Association
California Chamber of Commerce
California Community Banking Network
California Credit Union League
California Financial Services Association
California Mortgage Bankers Association
Cox Automotive, INC.
Opposition (unless amended)
California Association of Collectors, INC
California Creditors Bar Association
Electronic Transactions Association
Receivables Management Association International
Small Business Finance Association
Analysis Prepared by: Shiran Zohar / JUD. / (916) 319-2334
Date of Hearing: July 1, 2024
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON BANKING AND FINANCE
Timothy Grayson, Chair
SBPCA Bill Id:SB 1286
Author:(Min) – As Amended Ver:April 25, 2024
SENATE VOTE: 28-9
SUBJECT: Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: covered debt: commercial debts
SUMMARY: Expands the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Rosenthal Act) to cover commercial debts owed by specified types of debtors.
Specifically, this bill:
- Adds “covered commercial debt” to the Rosenthal Act, subjecting persons that engage in debt collection related to a covered commercial debt to that act.
- Defines the following terms:
- “Covered debt” means a consumer debt or a covered commercial debt.
- “Covered credit” means consumer credit or covered commercial credit.
- “Covered commercial debt” and “covered commercial credit” mean money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person to a lender, a commercial financing provider, or a debt buyer, as specified, by reason of a covered commercial credit transaction. “Covered commercial credit transaction” means a transaction between a person and another person in which property, services, or money, of a total value of no more than $500,000, is acquired on credit by that person from the other person primarily for other than personal, family, or household purposes.
- Provides that a debtor includes a natural person who guarantees an obligation related to a covered commercial credit transaction and does not include a corporation or limited liability company.
- Replaces “consumer debt” with “covered debt” throughout the Rosenthal Act, except in provisions related to communications with a debtor’s employer, consumer debt originated by a hospital, and an incorporation by reference of provisions of specified federal law related to consumer debt collection.
EXISTING LAW:
- Regulates the collection of consumer debt under the Rosenthal Act, which generally prohibits deceptive, dishonest, unfair, and unreasonable debt collection practices by debt collectors and regulates the form and content of communications by debt collectors to debtors and others. (Title 1.6C of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, Section 1788 et seq.) The Rosenthal Act:
- Defines the following terms:
- “Consumer debt” and “consumer credit” means money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person by reason of a consumer credit transaction. The term “consumer debt” includes a mortgage debt.
- “Consumer credit transaction” means a transaction between a natural person and another person in which property, services, or money is acquired on credit by that natural person from the other person primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
- “Debt collector” means any person who, in the ordinary course of business, regularly, on behalf of that person or others, engages in debt collection.
- “Debt collection” means any act or practice in connection with the collection of consumer debts. (Civil Code Section 1788.2)
- Prohibits a debt collector from the following conducts or practices, among others, when collecting or attempting to collect a consumer debt:
- The use or threat of physical force or violence. (Civil Code Section 1788.10)
- Threats and communications that rely on false representations. (Civil Code Section 1788.10 and 1788.13)
- Using obscene or profane language. (Civil Code Section 1788.11)
- Communicating with the debtor with such frequency as to be unreasonable, and to constitute harassment of the debtor under the circumstances. (Civil Code Section 1788.11)
- Communicating unnecessarily about the debtor’s debt with the debtor’s employer or extended family. (Civil Code Section 1788.12)
- Requires a debt collector to provide its California debt collector license number to a consumer in specified circumstances. (Civil Code Section 1788.11)
- Incorporates by reference specified provisions of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act into state law. (Civil Code Section 1788.17)
- Provides remedies to a harmed debtor in an amount equal to any actual damages sustained by the debtor as a result of violation, plus an amount of $100 - $1,000 if the violation was conducted willfully and knowingly by the debt collector. (Civil Code Section 1788.30)
- Provides a release from liability to a debt collector who cures a violation, as specified, or who shows by a preponderance of evidence that the violation was not intentional and resulted notwithstanding the maintenance of procedures reasonably adapted to avoid any such violation. (Civil Code Section 1788.30)
- Defines the following terms:
- Provides the Debt Collection Licensing Act (DCLA) that prohibits a person from engaging in the business of the collection of consumer debt without a license and requires the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation to administer the licensing program. (Division 25 of the Financial Code, Section 100000 et seq.)
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown. This bill is keyed Fiscal by Legislative Counsel.
COMMENTS:
- Purpose
According to the author:
Small businesses face many barriers in accessing capital, especially minority-owned businesses. Since the economic crash and Great Recession in 2008, many lenders have moved to require small business owners to personally guarantee their business debt. While lenders are within their right to require co-signatories, this goes against the purpose of entity formation. Although the individual is borrowing for their business, the personal guarantee exposes the individual to abusive, deceptive, or unfair debt collection practices. SB 1286 will extend the debt collection protections provided under the Rosenthal Act to individuals who have a personal guarantee on their business debt.
- Background: Protections related to the collection of consumer debt
An assortment of federal and state laws establish consumer protections related to debt collection and debt purchasing. These laws generally do not cover commercial debt. These consumer-centered statutes include:
- The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). In 1977, the federal government established the FDCPA to prohibit debt collectors from engaging in abusive, unfair or deceptive practices to collect debts. Violations of the FDCPA are enforceable through a private right of action or a class action, or through administrative action. Under the FDCPA, a debt collector must send a debtor written validation letters containing information such as the amount of debt and the name of the creditor to whom the debt is owed.
- The Rosenthal Act. This bill amends the Rosenthal Act, which was passed in 1977 to place reasonable limits on the kinds of activities that creditors and debt collectors can employ when collecting payments from consumers. The Rosenthal Act, like the FDCPA, prohibits deceptive, dishonest, unfair and unreasonable debt collection practices, and many of the law’s provisions govern how debt collectors can interact and communicate with consumers. The law also provides a private right of action for harmed consumers.
- The Fair Debt Buying Practices Act. The Legislature passed the Fair Debt Buying Practices Act in 2013 to provide protections to consumers whose debts were sold to a debt buyer. It requires a person who buys delinquent or charged-off consumer debt to maintain certain documentation and require a debt buyer to provide disclosures to consumers when the buyer attempts to collect debts that are beyond the applicable statute of limitations. While the Fair Debt Buying Practices Act applies only to instances when the transfer of collection is structured as a sale, it also contains stronger validation requirements than the Rosenthal Act and the federal Fair Debt Collections Practices Act.
- Debt Collection Licensing Act (DCLA). SB 908 (Wieckowski), Chapter 163, Statutes of 2020, establishes a program within the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) to license and oversee debt collectors and debt buyers in California. While this licensing program does not add significant new requirements for these entities, the new licensing program adds a layer of regulatory oversight over them. Under the DCLA, a debt collector and debt buyer must obtain a license and must comply with both the Rosenthal Act and Fair Debt Buying Practices Act. A licensee must pay an annual fee and requires DFPI to examine a licensees for compliance.
- Background: Commercial debt collectors
The myriad of federal and state statutes aimed at protecting consumers from debt collection harms do not apply to business debt. Generally, it is assumed that unlike a consumer, a business is more sophisticated and has greater means to evaluate commercial credit options and their associated risks. However, this assumption has started to weaken as policymakers and advocates scrutinize commercial debt collection practices.
In 2022, CFPB flagged small business debt collection issues stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic. The agency notes:
Of the estimated 31.7 million business enterprises in the country, small businesses constituted about 99.9% of all firms. Nearly 81% of those small businesses do not have paid employees. Of the business establishments with employees, the Census Bureau has identified 72.5% with 9 or fewer employees and more than half (54.4%) with fewer than 5. That suggests a level of resources and expertise for most small businesses on par with consumer borrowers rather than what may be the general perception of commercial enterprises with readily available financial resources and expertise. The result is the potential for exploitation comparative to what is encountered by consumers, without any of the protections granted to consumers by the FDCPA.[1]
Congress has also explored this issue. In 2022, Rep. Lawson introduced H.R. 6814, titled the Small Business Fair Debt Collection Act, to extend FDCPA protections to small businesses with loans or obligations less than $2.5 million. Writing in support of the measure, Small Business Majority argued that “While consumer borrowers are covered by FDCPA, small business borrowers are not. This is particularly concerning because many small business owners often use their personal finances to start and expand their businesses and will apply for credit using their personal credit, but they don’t receive the same protections as individual consumers.”
For its part, commercial debt collection industry actors make a case that responsible collectors do not engage in many of the activities barred by the FDCPA or the Rosenthal Act. For example, the Commercial Collection Agencies of America and the International Association of Commercial Collectors each publish a “Code of Ethics” with conduct rules that members must follow. Examples of prohibited behavior include making false statements, threatening debtors or their vendors, and making harassing phone calls.[2]
- What does this bill do?
SB 1286 extends Rosenthal Act protections to certain types of commercial debt. Specifically, Rosenthal Act would apply to money or property due or owing or alleged to be due by reason of a “covered commercial transaction,” which is a transaction that is $500,000 or more and acquired for a reason other than personal, family, or household purposes. Moreover, a debtor as it applies to a commercial debt must be a natural person and includes a natural person who guarantees an obligation related to a commercial credit transaction.
According to the sponsors, the above parameters mean that SB 1286 will extend Rosenthal Act to two situations: (1) When a person takes out a personal loan in their own name for the business; and (2) When a person co-signs a loan taken out in the business’s name. The author’s office contends that since the Great Recession, “many lenders started requiring business owners to personally sign for their business debt. While this practice is antithetical to the purpose of entity formation, lenders are within their right to require co-signatories. However, small businesses do not have the same protections as consumers in the collection of debt.”
- Summary of recent discussions
SB 1286 was amended in Senate Banking and Financial Institutions Committee following discussions between supporters, committee staff, and industry stakeholders. While those amendments addressed many of the earlier concerns about the bill’s scope, stakeholders have continued to debate whether certain provisions in the Rosenthal Act simply cannot work for business debt.
As an illustrative example, collection industry representatives argue that the prohibition against a collector contacting a debtor’s family member is incompatible with commercial debt because it is common for family members to work in the business. In this example, if the collector sends a payment request to the accounting department where a debtor’s family member also happens to work, have they violated SB 1286? (This issue would be addressed in amendments described in Comment #6)
As another example, the Rosenthal Act prohibits communicating to any person any list of debtors that discloses the nature or existence of a consumer debt, also referred to as “deadbeat lists,” except for reports to a consumer reporting agency. Opponents argue that these limitations, if applied to commercial debt, calls into question the ways that commercial lenders help determine the creditworthiness of business borrowers. Commercial lenders use databases or “business bureaus” run by private firms, and the Rosenthal Act’s allowance for reporting consumer credit agencies does not apply to these types of companies.
Opponents describe a scenario where John’s Pizza, LLC is provided a loan that is personally guaranteed by John. The business defaults on the loan, and John cannot be located because he has left the country. A year later, John returns and applies for a loan for John’s Tacos, LLC. Opponents argue that under SB 1286, a creditor would be barred from reporting to anyone their experience with John and John’s Pizza, LLC because the expansion of the Rosenthal Act to business debt bars this activity, even for an individual.
Supporters of the bill contend that in this scenario, the Rosenthal Act already allows for John’s actions to be reported to a consumer reporting agency, even for a business debt, which will serve as a signal to future creditors. Generally, a person’s credit score is used to determine their creditworthiness for a personal loan that is used for business purposes or for when the person co-signs the loan. SB 1286 does not change that.
As a third example, opponents also argue that the prohibition against written communication with the debtor that displays or conveys information about a commercial debt could prohibit sending invoices to the accounts receivables department. The author’s response that SB 1286 allows for such invoices to be sent to a business for the business debt, but not to an individual. Moreover, this prohibition applies only when the intent of the communication is to embarrass the debtor, and it is unclear why an invoice would meet that standard.
The above disagreements reflect, in large part, a different risk analysis from the supporters and opponents. Opponents, who must comply with the Rosenthal Act, see new traps that would produce litigation or confusion. They are correct to worry about the details and the associated risks associated with expanding the Rosenthal Act to some business debts.
- Amendments and a procedural note
The author has committed to taking the following amendments. If it is to move forward, this bill will next need to be heard in Assembly Judiciary Committee the following business day (July 2, 2024). Therefore, for process reasons, amendments will need to be taken either in Assembly Judiciary or upon returning from the Summer Recess. These amendments are meant to clarify the scope of SB 1286, make technical fixes, and respond to specific requests from creditor or collection industry representatives. Specifically:
- Clarify that SB 1286 is not intended to create an additional licensing requirement by adding (c) to Section 1788.1 as follows:
(c) Nothing in this title is intended to create or impose an additional licensing requirement under Division 25 (commencing with Section 100000) of the Financial Code on a debt collector with respect to the collection of covered commercial debt or covered commercial credit.
- Modify the definition of “debtor” in response to stakeholder feedback. Delete reference to LLCs and corporations given that “debtor” is a natural person. Specifically, modify Civ. Code Section 1788.2 (h) (2) as follows:
(2) In relation to a covered commercial debt, debt or covered commercial credit, a “debtor” includes shall mean a natural person who guarantees an obligation related to a covered commercial credit transaction.
(3) A “debtor” does not include a corporation or limited liability company.
- Narrow prohibition on communicating information regarding a covered debt to a member of debtor’s family member to consumer debt. Specifically, amend Civil Code Sec 1788.12(b) as follows:
(b) Communicating information regarding a covered consumer debt to any member of the debtor’s family, other than the debtor’s spouse or the parents or guardians of the debtor who is either a minor or who resides in the same household with that parent or guardian, prior to obtaining a judgment against the debtor, except where the purpose of the communication is to locate the debtor, or where the debtor or their attorney has consented in writing to that communication.
- Make clarifying change to reflect that commercial debt collectors do not need a license. Specially, amend Section 1788.13(l) as follows:
(l) Any communication by a licensed collection agency to a debtor demanding money unless the claim is actually assigned to the collection agency.
- Fix an outdated reference to the California Private Protection Agency: Amend Civil Code Section 1788.18(b)(1) as follows:
(2) The debtor’s written statement that the debtor claims to be the victim of identity theft with respect to the specific debt being collected by the debt collector.
(b) The written statement described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) shall consist of either of the following:
(1) A written statement that contains the content of the Identity Theft Victim’s Fraudulent Account Information Request offered to the public by the California Privacy Protection Agency Office of Privacy Protection.
- Updating venue provision. Specifically, add to Civil Code Section 1788.15 the following:
(c) Notwithstanding subdivision (b), when the obligation of the debtor arises from a guaranty by the debtor of a covered commercial debt, a debt collector may collect or attempt to collect covered commercial debt by means of a judicial proceeding in the county in which the non-natural person for whose purpose the commercial debt was incurred is located.
(d) This section shall apply to all delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
- Make the following technical change to Civil Code Section 1788.22(a)(1):
(1) No such person shall attempt to consummate any consumer covered credit transaction or small business credit transaction thereunder knowing that credit privileges under the account have been terminated or suspended.
- Clarify that the Debt Collector Licensing Act does not apply to commercial debt or covered commercial credit, as defined by this bill. Specifically, amend Financial Code Section 100001 (c) as follows:
(c) This division shall not apply to debt collection regulated pursuant to Division 12.5 (commencing with Section 28100) or to the collection of covered commercial debt or covered commercial credit, as those terms are defined in Title 1.6C (commencing with Section 1788) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code.
- Prior and related legislation.
SB 1482 (Glazer) of this legislative session expands the scope of the California Licensing Law to cover specified commercial financing transactions offered to small businesses and establishes requirements and prohibitions on commercial financing providers and brokers engaged in such transactions. SB 1482 is scheduled to be heard by this committee during the same hearing as this bill.
SB 1324 (Durazo) of the 2021-22 session would have added rental debt as a consumer debt covered by the Rosenthal Act, thus requiring a landlord or third party collecting rental debt on behalf of a landlord to comply with the Rosenthal Act. The bill passed this committee, but subsequently was held by the Senate Appropriations Committee.
SB 187 (Wieckowski, Chapter 545, Statutes of 2019) provides that a mortgage debt is a consumer debt for the purposes of the Rosenthal Act and removes an exemption in the Rosenthal Act for attorneys who regularly, in the ordinary course of business, collect debts on behalf of themselves or others.
- Support
A coalition of organizations representing consumers and small businesses, including the East Bay Community Law Center, Small Business Majority, California Low-income Consumer Coalition, and the Consumer Federation of California, argue in support of this bill. Their coalition letter states:
Since the 2008 Great Recession, many lenders started requiring business owners to personally sign for their business debt. Lenders are within their right to require co-signatories, however a personal guarantee defeats the purpose of an LLC, and it is antithetical to the purpose of entity formation…. Given the lack of access to traditional business funding and the current trend of requiring personal guarantees, the need for dignified debt collection practices for individuals who incur debt for their business is necessary as small businesses do not have the same protections as consumers in the collection of a business debt.
- Opposition
The California Association of Collectors, California Creditor Bar Association, Electronic Transactions Association, and Receivables Management Association International, and the Small Business Finance Association are opposed to SB 1286, unless amended. Some of these submitted amendments have been agreed to by the author, as described in Comment #6. The coalition writes:
The provisions of the Rosenthal Act are ill-suited for commercial debt collection. For instance, while individual consumers have the right to demand that creditors cease contact, it is unclear under SB 1286 whom a creditor or collector may contact concerning the covered commercial debts. This ambiguity raises concerns about potential violations of privacy and confidentiality, particularly regarding the disclosure of debt details to employees handling accounts payable.
Commercial debt collection requires a tailored approach that accounts for the unique dynamics of business transactions, rather than applying regulations intended for individual consumers to commercial transactions
Additionally, a coalition that includes the California Bankers Association, the California Mortgage Bankers Association, the California Credit Union League, and the American Financial Services Association opposes this bill. Among their concerns, the coalition argues this bill should apply to smaller commercial credit transactions:
Critically, the $500,000 threshold in Section 1788.2(o) of covered commercial loans established in SB 1286 would cover even very sophisticated and complex loans; and the measure should be tailored to protect small businesses as the proponents claim it does. Loan relationships with commercial loan customers can be complex and contain several lines of credit that would be technically covered under the Act. For example, a borrower may have $10 million in loans with credit lines of varying amounts, including a line of credit for $200,000 – it would cause complications for both creditors and debts alike if different rules apply for some lines within that loan and not others. It is our understanding that this type of sophisticated borrower is not the intended recipient of these protections. As such, SB 1286 should establish a $100,000 maximum that can be owed to any one lender for these provisions to apply. In this context it is also worth noting that 1788.2(o) uses the term “value,” which is subjective and may be up for debate. To avoid uncertainty or conflict, the $100,000 threshold needs to be tied to the time of origination of the loan, which is clear and agreed upon by both parties
Cox Automotive, on behalf of its subsidiary NextGear Capital (NGC), opposes SB 1286 and argues that the Rosenthal Act is not necessary for floorplan lending. Cox Automotive writes:
As amended, SB 1286 extends existing law prohibiting debt collectors from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the collection of consumer debt to California small business borrowers, including motor-vehicle dealers who are sophisticated commercial borrowers. In the case of default, NGC is already obligated to act fairly pursuant to state and federal UDAAP rules and regulations (including existing California state code), making SB 1286 redundant for our operations.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
Berkeley Law & Organizing Collective
California Coalition for Community Investment
California Low-income Consumer Coalition
Cameo - California Association for Micro Enterprise Opportunity
Consumer Attorneys of California
Consumer Federation of California
Decosimo Law
East Bay Community Law Center
Housing and Economic Rights Advocates (HERA)
Ica
LA Cocina
Microenterprise Collaborative of Inland Southern California
Public Law Center
Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center
San Juan Capistrano Chamber of Commerce
Small Business Majority
Sonya Yruel Photography
The Lisa B Company
Oppose
American Financial Services Association
California Bankers Association
California Chamber of Commerce
California Community Banking Network
California Credit Union League
California Financial Services Association
California Mortgage Bankers Association
Cox Automotive, INC.
Oppose Unless Amended
California Association of Collectors, INC
California Creditors Bar Association
Electronic Transactions Association
Receivables Management Association International
Small Business Finance Association
Analysis Prepared by: Luke Reidenbach / B. & F. / (916) 319-3081
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | SB 1286 |
THIRD READING
Bill No: SB 1286
Author: Min (D)
Amended: 4/25/24
Vote: 21
SENATE BANKING & F.I. COMMITTEE: 4-2, 4/17/24
AYES: Limón, Caballero, Min, Portantino
NOES: Niello, Nguyen
NO VOTE RECORDED: Bradford
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE: 9-2, 4/23/24
AYES: Umberg, Allen, Ashby, Caballero, Durazo, Gonzalez, Laird, Min, Wahab
NOES: Wilk, Niello
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: Senate Rule 28.8
SUBJECT: Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: covered debt: small business debts
SOURCE: Cameo -California Association for Micro Enterprise Opportunity Consumer Federation of California
East Bat Community Law Center
Small Business Majority
DIGEST:
This bill expands the scope of the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Rosenthal Act) to cover specified commercial debt, providing certain debtors with protections from harassment and other prohibited collections activities.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- Regulates the collection of consumer debt under the Rosenthal Act, which generally prohibits deceptive, dishonest, unfair, and unreasonable debt collection practices by debt collectors and regulates the form and content of communications by debt collectors to debtors and others. (Title 1.6C of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, Section 1788 et seq.) The Rosenthal Act:
- Defines the following terms:
- “Consumer debt” and “consumer credit” means money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person by reason of a consumer credit transaction. The term “consumer debt” includes a mortgage debt.
- “Consumer credit transaction” means a transaction between a natural person and another person in which property, services, or money is acquired on credit by that natural person from the other person primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
- “Debt collector” means any person who, in the ordinary course of business, regularly, on behalf of that person or others, engages in debt collection.
- “Debt collection” means any act or practice in connection with the collection of consumer debts. (Civil Code Section 1788.2)
- Prohibits a debt collector from the following conducts or practices, among others, when collecting or attempting to collect a consumer debt:
- The use or threat of physical force or violence. (Civil Code Section 1788.10)
- Threats and communications that rely on false representations. (Civil Code Section 1788.10 and 1788.13)
- Using obscene or profane language. (Civil Code Section 1788.11)
- Communicating with the debtor with such frequency as to be unreasonable, and to constitute harassment of the debtor under the circumstances. (Civil Code Section 1788.11)
- Communicating unnecessarily about the debtor’s debt with the debtor’s employer or extended family. (Civil Code Section 1788.12)
- Requires a debt collector to provide its California debt collector license number to a consumer in specified circumstances. (Civil Code Section 1788.11)
- Incorporates by reference specified provisions of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act into state law. (Civil Code Section 1788.17)
- Provides remedies to a harmed debtor in an amount equal to any actual damages sustained by the debtor as a result of violation, plus an amount of $100 - $1,000 if the violation was conducted willfully and knowingly by the debt collector. (Civil Code Section 1788.30)
- Provides a release from liability to a debt collector who cures a violation, as specified, or who shows by a preponderance of evidence that the violation was not intentional and resulted notwithstanding the maintenance of procedures reasonably adapted to avoid any such violation. (Civil Code Section 1788.30)
- Defines the following terms:
- Provides the Debt Collection Licensing Act (DCLA) that prohibits a person from engaging in the business of the collection of consumer debt without a license and requires the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation to administer the licensing program. (Division 25 of the Financial Code, Section 100000 et seq.)
This bill:
- Adds “covered commercial debt” to the Rosenthal Act, subjecting persons that engage in debt collection related to a covered commercial debt to that act.
- Defines the following terms:
- “Covered debt” means a consumer debt or a covered commercial debt.
- “Covered credit” means consumer credit or covered commercial credit.
- “Covered commercial debt” and “covered commercial credit” mean money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person to a lender, a commercial financing provider, or a debt buyer, as specified, by reason of a small business credit transaction.
- “Covered commercial credit transaction” means a transaction between a person and another person in which property, services, or money, of a total value of no more than $500,000, is acquired on credit by that person from the other person primarily for other than personal, family, or household purposes.
- Provides that a debtor includes a natural person who guarantees an obligation related to a covered commercial credit transaction and does not include a corporation or limited liability company.
- Replaces “consumer debt” with “covered debt” throughout the Rosenthal Act, except in provisions related to communications with a debtor’s employer, consumer debt originated by a hospital, and an incorporation by reference of provisions of specified federal law related to consumer debt collection.
Comments
Author’s Statement. According to the author:
Navigating the small business lending landscape is a longstanding, serious challenge for entrepreneurs. Traditional bank lending to small businesses is inaccessible to most entrepreneurs, especially entrepreneurs of color and women entrepreneurs. Alternative lenders have stepped in to fill this gap, but do not operate under the same regulations as traditional lenders. Since the 2008 Great Recession, many lenders started requiring business owners to personally sign for their business debt. Lenders are within their right to require co-signatories, however a personal guarantee defeats the purpose of an LLC and is antithetical to the purpose of entity formation. Given the lack of access to traditional business funding and the current trend of requiring personal guarantees, the need for dignified debt collection practices for individuals who incur debt for their business is necessary as small businesses do not have the same protections as consumers in the collection of a business debt. SB 1286 would extend the consumer debt collection protections provided under the Rosenthal Act to small business owners.
Background
This bill seeks to extend the scope of the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“Rosenthal Act”) to certain commercial debts. At its essence, the Rosenthal Act seeks to protect consumers from unfair and deceptive practices by a person collecting consumer debt. The law prohibits or restricts a variety of activities designed to intimidate or annoy, such as calling a debtor in the middle of the night; letting a phone ring incessantly; threatening actions that the debt collector cannot or does not plan to take; threatening or using violence; contacting a debtor’s friends, employers, or extended family to notify them of the debtor’s debt; and using obscene or threatening language. The law also prohibits various false representations, unfair practices, and improper use of judicial proceedings.
The remedies provided by the Rosenthal Act are fairly modest. Nothing in the Rosenthal Act allows for the forgiveness or cancellation of debt. The law provides avenues to avoid liability in the case of unintentional errors and a 15-day right to cure any violation. If a debt collector violates the law, they may be found liable for actual damages sustained by the debtor, but often such damages are related to stress and not monetary in nature. For a debt collector who willfully and knowingly violates the law, the Rosenthal Act provides a minimum liability of $100 and maximum liability of $1,000, in addition to any actual damages incurred and reasonable attorney’s fees.
Expanding the scope of Rosenthal. This bill adds specified commercial debts to the scope of the Rosenthal Act, which would grant the same protections to persons owing these commercial debts as are provided by existing law to persons owing consumer debt. This bill expands the scope of Rosenthal to cover debts that meet all of the following criteria:
- Who owes? The debt must be owed by a natural person. The author intends to cover debts owed directly by a natural person or where a natural person has co-signed or provided a personal guarantee on a credit product. The author does not intend to cover a debt owed by a business entity, such as a corporation or LLC, that does not contain a personal guarantee.
- What for? The underlying credit transaction was undertaken “for use primarily for other than personal, family, or household purposes.” This phrase is used in the California Financing Law to distinguish a “commercial loan” from a “consumer loan.”
- Owed to whom? The debt must be owed to a lender, a commercial financing provider, or a debt buyer. This keeps credit transactions between two non-financial businesses outside of the scope of Rosenthal, meaning a supplier that provides goods on credit will not be deemed a debt collector.
- How much is owed? The underlying credit transaction that created the debt cannot exceed $500,000. This same threshold exists for the state’s commercial financing disclosure law and a law enacted last year that prohibits certain “junk fees” on commercial financing transactions.
Is the Rosenthal Act Appropriate for Commercial Debt? The Rosenthal Act was enacted in 1977 to regulate the collection of consumer debt. Some of its provisions, such as prohibitions on threats and harassment, can be readily applied to collections related to commercial debt. Other provisions, however, may be less suitable. For example, one provision prohibits a debt collector from communicating with a debtor’s employer, which does not contemplate a situation where the debtor is self-employed and the debt is related to the debtor’s commercial activities. Additionally, the Rosenthal Act incorporates by reference provisions of the Federal Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA), which covers consumer debt and cannot be used as a basis for a person collecting a commercial debt to “comply” with. The bill was amended in committee to address these potential incongruities.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: Yes
SUPPORT: (Verified 5/14/24)
Cameo - California Association for Micro Enterprise Opportunity (co-source)
Consumer Federation of California (co-source)
East Bay Community Law Center (co-source)
Small Business Majority (co-source)
Berkeley Law & Organizing Collective
Bet Tzedek Legal Services
California Coalition for Community Investment
California Low-income Consumer Federation
Consumer Attorneys of California
Decosimo Law
Housing and Economic Rights Advocates (HERA)
Ica
LA Cocina
Microenterprise Collaborative of Inland Southern California
Public Law Center
Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center
Responsible Business Lending Coalition
San Juan Capistrano Chamber of Commerce
Sonya Yruel Photography
The Lisa B Company
25 individuals
OPPOSITION: (Verified 5/14/24)
American Financial Services Association
California Association of Collectors, Inc.
California Bankers Association
California Chamber of Commerce
California Community Banking Network
California Credit Union League
California Creditors Bar Association
California Financial Services Association
California Mortgage Bankers Association
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT:
A coalition of small business advocacy and consumer law organizations, led by East Bay Community Law Center, write in support:
A micro-business is a firm with five or fewer employees, started for $50,000 or less in initial capital and that may not have access to traditional commercial loans. In California, 3.2 million microbusinesses have no employees. These businesses typically lack access to sophisticated legal resources to help them navigate the lending landscape. Small Business Majority opinion polling found 74% of small business owners feel that while online lending has opened up new sources of capital, these lenders should be regulated to ensure small businesses are protected from predatory practices. New scientific opinion polling sheds more light on small business owners’ views regarding the lending landscape, and shows that small business owners are broadly supportive of a range of policies that would support responsible lending practices while helping them access the capital they need to launch and grow their businesses…
Given the lack of access to traditional business funding and the current trend of requiring personal guarantees, the need for dignified debt collection practices for individuals who incur debt for their business is necessary as small businesses do not have the same protections as consumers in the collection of a business debt.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION:
A coalition of lenders, including the California Bankers Association, writes in opposition:
SB 1286 proposes to incorporate commercial business debts into Rosenthal, an act enforced through the least sophisticated consumer standard. By definition, a business is not a consumer. Because both the FDCPA and Rosenthal provide oversight over the collection of individual consumer debts and are applied at the least sophisticated consumer standard, it would be more appropriate to consider alternative methods to accomplish the goal of creating additional criteria for collection of commercial debts owed by a small or micro business.
Consumer debt versus commercial debt is not an apples-to-apples comparison. Business owners are generally entrusted with a higher credit line than traditional consumers due to the rigorous requirements and sophistication needed to access a commercial purpose loan. Because Rosenthal provides oversight over the collection of consumer debts, many of the act’s provisions impractical or are simply impossible in the context of the collection of commercial debts…
After discussing several specific examples of Rosenthal provisions that are arguably ill-suited for commercial debt collection, the letter requests a reduction of the threshold that triggers inclusion as a “covered commercial credit transaction” from $500,000 to $100,000 and limiting the scope to debts originated after July 2025. The letter concludes:
[C]ombining commercial debts owed by a small business into the Rosenthal framework is not a simple and direct addition, and in fact, represents a substantial change to existing law that may ultimately harm those that SB 1286 attempts to help – this change is deserving of thorough and thoughtful analysis for which the process simply has not allowed.Click here to enter text.
Prepared by: Michael Burdick / B. & F.I. /
5/14/24 15:06:53
**** END ****
Senator Thomas Umberg, Chair
2023-2024 Regular Session
Bill No: SB 1286 (Author:Min)
Version: March 18, 2024
Hearing Date: April 23, 2024
Fiscal: Yes
Urgency: No
Consultant: CK
SUBJECT
Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: covered debt: small business debts
DIGEST
This bill extends the scope of the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“Rosenthal Act”) to cover the collection of “covered commercial debts,” as defined.[1]
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Rosenthal Act establishes a set of basic norms that debt collectors must adhere to when going about their work. Without excusing anyone from paying what they rightly owe, Rosenthal requires debt collectors to treat debtors civilly and honestly throughout the process. It prohibits things like threatening debtors, trying to trick them, humiliating them in front of others, or calling them up repeatedly in the middle of the night to demand payment.
Small business owners steeped in commercial debt are often faced with the same pressures and limitations as consumers are with consumer debt. However, the Rosenthal Act only covered consumer debt, meaning it was taken out primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
This bill, as recently agreed to be amended, extends select portions of the Rosenthal Act to include “covered commercial debt.” This is defined as money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person to a lender, a commercial financing provider, or a debt buyer by reason of a covered commercial credit transaction.
The bill is co-sponsored by East Bay Community Law Center, the Consumer Federation of California, Small Business Majority, and the California Association for Micro Enterprise Opportunity (CAMEO). The bill is supported by various legal services and business organizations, including the San Juan Capistrano Chamber of Commerce and Bet Tzedek Legal Services. It is opposed by various industry associations, including the California Association of Collectors. This bill passed out of the Senate Banking and Financial Institutions Committee on a vote of 4 to 2.
PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE LAW
Existing law:
- Prohibits debt collectors, pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), from using abusive, unfair, or deceptive practices. (15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq.)
- Defines a debt collector as a person who regularly collects, or attempts to collect, debts owed to another person. (15 U.S.C. § 1692a)
- Establishes the Rosenthal Act to regulate the collection of consumer debt, generally prohibiting deceptive, dishonest, unfair, and unreasonable debt collection practices by debt collectors and regulates the form and content of communications by debt collectors to debtors and others. (Civ. Code §§ 1788 et seq.) The Rosenthal Act:
- Defines “consumer debt” and “consumer credit” as money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person by reason of a consumer credit transaction. The term “consumer debt” includes a mortgage debt. (Civ. Code § 1788.2.)
- Defines “consumer credit transaction” as a transaction between a natural person and another person in which property, services, or money is acquired on credit by that natural person from the other person primarily for personal, family, or household purposes. (Civ. Code § 1788.2.)
- Defines “debt collector” as any person who, in the ordinary course of business, regularly, on behalf of that person or others, engages in debt collection.
- Prohibits a debt collector from the following conduct or practices, among others, when collecting or attempting to collect a consumer debt:
- The use or threat of physical force or violence. (Civ. Code § 1788.10.)
- Threats and communications that rely on false representations. (Civ. Code §§ 1788.10 and 1788.13.)
- Using obscene or profane language. (Civ. Code § 1788.11.)
- Communicating with the debtor with such frequency as to be unreasonable, and to constitute harassment of the debtor under the circumstances. (Civ. Code § 1788.11.)
- Communicating unnecessarily about the debtor’s debt with the debtor’s employer or extended family. (Civ. Code § 1788.12.)
- Requires a debt collector to provide its California debt collector license number to a consumer in specified circumstances. (Civ. Code § 1788.11.)
- Incorporates by reference specified provisions of the FDCPA into state law, but exempts original creditors and specified people collecting debts on their behalf from some of those incorporated provisions. (Civ. Code § 1788.17.)
- Provides remedies to a harmed debtor in an amount equal to any actual damages sustained by the debtor as a result of the violation, plus an amount of $100 - $1,000 if the violation was conducted willfully and knowingly by the debt collector. (Civ. Code § 1788.30.)
- Provides a release from liability to a debt collector who cures a violation, as specified, or who shows by a preponderance of evidence that the violation was not intentional and resulted notwithstanding the maintenance of procedures reasonably adapted to avoid any such violation. (Civ. Code § 1788.30.)
This bill:
- Adds “covered commercial debt” to the scope of the Rosenthal Act. Makes clear that a “debtor” with relation to such debts includes a natural person who guarantees an obligation related to a covered commercial credit transaction but does not include a corporation or limited liability company.
- Defines the following terms:
- “Covered debt” means a consumer debt or a covered commercial debt.
- “Covered credit” means consumer credit or covered commercial credit.
- “Covered commercial debt” and “covered commercial credit” mean money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person to a lender, a commercial financing provider, or a debt buyer, by reason of a covered commercial credit transaction.
- “Covered commercial credit transaction” means a transaction between a person and another person in which property, services, or money of a total value of no more than $500,000 is acquired on credit by that person from the other person for use primarily for other than personal, family, or household purposes.
- Replaces “consumer debt” with “covered debt” throughout much of the Rosenthal Act, except for certain provisions, including those related to consumer debt originated by a hospital, provisions prohibiting calling a debtor’s employer, and the section incorporating by reference the FDCPA.
- Applies the provisions of Section 1788.14.5 to delinquent covered commercial debt sold or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
COMMENTS
- Stated intent of the bill
According to the author:
Small businesses face many barriers in accessing capital, especially minority-owned businesses. Since the economic crash and Great Recession in 2008, many lenders have moved to require small business owners to personally guarantee their business debt. While lenders are within their right to require co-signatories, this goes against the purpose of entity formation. Although the individual is borrowing for their business, the personal guarantee exposes the individual to abusive, deceptive, or unfair debt collection practices. SB 1286 will extend the debt collection protections provided under the Rosenthal Act to individuals who have a personal guarantee on their business debt.
- The Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Since 1977, the Rosenthal Act has protected debtors against the most egregious tactics that creditors might otherwise be tempted to utilize while pursuing their money. The Rosenthal Act prohibits creditors from engaging in deceptive, harassing, humiliating, threatening, or otherwise unreasonable conduct while seeking payment. For example, under the Rosenthal Act, a creditor cannot try to extract payments by waking the debtor up in the middle of the night with repeated phone calls; trying to embarrass the debtor in front of family members or their employer; threatening to have the debtor sent to jail, cursing at the debtor, or telling the debtor that the creditor will drop the matter in exchange for a payment when the creditor has no actual intention of doing so. Nothing in the Rosenthal Act excuses a debtor from having to pay, but the Rosenthal Act does demand that creditors treat the people who owe them money with honesty and civility.
The Rosenthal Act applies to “consumer debt,” which is defined as “money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person by reason of a consumer credit transaction.” (Civ. Code § 1788.2(f).) “Consumer credit transaction” is defined as “a transaction between a natural person and another person in which property, services or money is acquired on credit by that natural person from such other person primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.” (Civ. Code § 1788.2(e).)
- Extending the protections of the Rosenthal Act to commercial debt
This bill extends the modest protections of the Rosenthal Act to “covered commercial debts,” defined as money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person to a lender, a commercial financing provider, or a debt buyer by reason of a covered commercial credit transaction. The term “covered commercial credit transaction” means a transaction between a person and another person in which property, services, or money of a total value no more than $500,000 is acquired on credit by that person from the other person for use primarily for other than personal, family, or household purposes.
The bill makes clear that a “debtor” for the purposes of covered commercial debts includes natural persons who guarantee an obligation related to a covered commercial credit transaction but does not include a corporation or limited liability company. In response to opposition concerns, the bill has taken amendments to narrow its scope. The bill changes references in many provisions of the Rosenthal Act from consumer debt to covered debt, which includes both consumer and covered commercial debt, but does not extend this change to provisions governing collection of consumer debt originated with a hospital, provisions prohibiting communicating with a debtor’s employer, and the section incorporating by reference the FDCPA.
A wide coalition of groups, including the East Bay Community Law Center, several small business advocacy organizations, and various consumer groups, write in support:
Since the 2008 Great Recession, many lenders started requiring business owners to personally sign for their business debt. Lenders are within their right to require co-signatories, however a personal guarantee defeats the purpose of an LLC, and is antithetical to the purpose of entity formation.
These requirements only hurt minority entrepreneurship. Disparities in access to capital for minority-owned small businesses are well-documented, even if you control for factors like revenue. For instance, a study from Stanford found Latino-owned businesses had lower approval rates than white-owned businesses for loans of over $50,000, despite having larger revenues, similar credit scores, and less debt. . . .
Given the lack of access to traditional business funding and the current trend of requiring personal guarantees, the need for dignified debt collection practices for individuals who incur debt for their business is necessary as small businesses do not have the same protections as consumers in the collection of a business debt.
This bill is narrowly tailored to solve the specific issue—and only applies to individual people who incur a business debt. The rationale behind the Rosenthal Act is applicable to small business owners (the people behind the business): decency and informed debt collection practices. No abuse should be allowed in the collection of a small business debt.
Writing in opposition, the California Association of Collectors argues:
SB 1286 seeks to extend the coverage of the Rosenthal Act to include "small business" debts, thereby subjecting commercial transactions to regulations originally designed to protect individual consumers. While we understand the intention behind this bill, we believe it is fundamentally flawed and impractical for several reasons. . . .
Moreover, the provisions of the Rosenthal Act are ill-suited for commercial debt collection. For instance, while individual consumers have the right to demand that creditors cease contact, it is unclear under SB 1286 to whom a creditor or collector may reach out to, in the case of a small business. This ambiguity raises concerns about potential violations of privacy and confidentiality, particularly regarding the disclosure of debt details to employees handling accounts payable.
Lastly the bill as currently written, will require all commercial debt collection companies to be licensed. Commercial debt collection requires a tailored approach that accounts for the unique dynamics of business transactions, rather than applying regulations intended for individual consumers.
SUPPORT
Cameo - California Association for Micro Enterprise Opportunity (sponsor)
Consumer Federation of California (sponsor)
East Bay Community Law Center (sponsor)
Small Business Majority (sponsor)
Berkeley Law & Organizing Collective
Bet Tzedek Legal Services
California Coalition for Community Investment
California Low-income Consumer Federation
Consumer Attorneys of California
Decosimo Law
Housing and Economic Rights Advocates (HERA)
ICA
La Cocina
Microenterprise Collaborative of Inland Southern California
Public Law Center
Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center
San Juan Capistrano Chamber of Commerce
Sonya Yruel Photography
The Lisa B Company
25 Individuals
OPPOSITION
American Financial Services Association
California Association of Collectors, Inc.
California Bankers Association
California Chamber of Commerce
California Community Banking Network
California Credit Union League
California Creditors Bar Association
California Financial Services Association
California Mortgage Bankers Association
RELATED LEGISLATION
Pending Legislation: SB 1482 (Glazer, 2024) expands the California Financing Law (CFL) to include all types of commercial financing offered to small businesses; and adds new requirements for commercial financing providers and commercial financing brokers in commercial financing transactions with small businesses, as defined. These provisions will take effect January 1, 2026. SB 1482 is currently in this Committee.
Prior Legislation:
SB 908 (Wieckowski, Ch. 163, Stats. 2020) established the Debt Collection Licensing Act, which provides for licensure, regulation, and oversight of debt collectors by the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation.
SB 187 (Wieckowski, Ch. 545, Stats. 2019) added mortgage debt to the definition of consumer debt covered by the Rosenthal Act and removed the exception for an attorney or counselor at law from the definition of debt collector under the Rosenthal Act.
AB 969 (Papan, Ch. 319, Stats. 1999) incorporated some components of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, including its remedies provisions, into the Rosenthal Act, with specified exceptions.
SB 237 (Robbins, Ch. 907, Stats. 1977) enacted the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
PRIOR VOTES:
Senate Banking and Financial Institutions Committee (Ayes 4, Noes 2)
**************
This is an analysis of the bill as was agreed to be amended in the Senate Banking and Financial Institutions Committee. The amendments will be taken in this Committee. ↑
SENATE COMMITTEE ON
BANKING AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
Senator Monique Limón, Chair
2023 - 2024 Regular
Bill No: SB 1286 Hearing Date: April 17, 2024
Author: | Min | ||
Version: | March 18, 2024 Amended | ||
Urgency: | No | Fiscal: | Yes |
Consultant: | Michael Burdick | ||
Subject: Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: covered debt: small business debts
SUMMARY
This bill expands the scope of the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to cover specified commercial debt, providing certain debtors with protections from harassment and other prohibited collections activities.
EXISTING LAW
- Regulates the collection of consumer debt under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“Rosenthal Act”), which generally prohibits deceptive, dishonest, unfair, and unreasonable debt collection practices by debt collectors and regulates the form and content of communications by debt collectors to debtors and others. (Title 1.6C of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, Section 1788 et seq.) The Rosenthal Act:
- Defines the following terms:
- “Consumer debt” and “consumer credit” means money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person by reason of a consumer credit transaction. The term “consumer debt” includes a mortgage debt.
- “Consumer credit transaction” means a transaction between a natural person and another person in which property, services, or money is acquired on credit by that natural person from the other person primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
- “Debt collector” means any person who, in the ordinary course of business, regularly, on behalf of that person or others, engages in debt collection.
- “Debt collection” means any act or practice in connection with the collection of consumer debts. (Civil Code Section 1788.2)
- Prohibits a debt collector from the following conducts or practices, among others, when collecting or attempting to collect a consumer debt:
- The use or threat of physical force or violence. (Civil Code Section 1788.10)
- Threats and communications that rely on false representations. (Civil Code Section 1788.10 and 1788.13)
- Using obscene or profane language. (Civil Code Section 1788.11)
- Communicating with the debtor with such frequency as to be unreasonable, and to constitute harassment of the debtor under the circumstances. (Civil Code Section 1788.11)
- Communicating unnecessarily about the debtor’s debt with the debtor’s employer or extended family. (Civil Code Section 1788.12)
- Requires a debt collector to provide its California debt collector license number to a consumer in specified circumstances. (Civil Code Section 1788.11)
- Incorporates by reference specified provisions of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act into state law. (Civil Code Section 1788.17)
- Provides remedies to a harmed debtor in an amount equal to any actual damages sustained by the debtor as a result of violation, plus an amount of $100 - $1,000 if the violation was conducted willfully and knowingly by the debt collector. (Civil Code Section 1788.30)
- Provides a release from liability to a debt collector who cures a violation, as specified, or who shows by a preponderance of evidence that the violation was not intentional and resulted notwithstanding the maintenance of procedures reasonably adapted to avoid any such violation. (Civil Code Section 1788.30)
- Defines the following terms:
- Provides the Debt Collection Licensing Act (DCLA) that prohibits a person from engaging in the business of the collection of consumer debt without a license and requires the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation to administer the licensing program. (Division 25 of the Financial Code, Section 100000 et seq.)
THIS BILL
- Adds “small business debt” to the Rosenthal Act, subjecting persons that engage in debt collection related to a small business debt to that act.
- Defines the following terms:
- “Covered debt” means a consumer debt or a small business debt.
- “Covered credit” means consumer credit or small business credit.
- “Small business debt” and “small business credit” mean money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person by reason of a small business credit transaction.
- “Small business credit transaction” means a transaction between a small business or small business owner and another person in which property, services, or money is acquired on credit by that small business or small business owner from the other person primarily for purposes related to the activities of the small business.
- “Small business” means an independently owned and operated business that is not dominant in its field of operation and meets all of the following criteria:
- The principal office of the business is located in California.
- The officers of the business are domiciled in California.
- The business, together with its affiliates, has 100 or fewer employees.
- The business had average annual gross receipts of fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000) or less over the previous three years.
- Replaces “consumer debt” with “covered debt” throughout the Rosenthal Act, except for a provision related to consumer debt originated by a hospital.
- Adds “small business credit transaction” to the provision of the Rosenthal Act that prohibits a person, in connection with credit extended to them under an account, from attempting to consummate a transaction knowing that credit privileges under the account have been terminated or suspended.
COMMENTS
- PURPOSE
According to the author:
Navigating the small business lending landscape is a longstanding, serious challenge for entrepreneurs. Traditional bank lending to small businesses is inaccessible to most entrepreneurs, especially entrepreneurs of color and women entrepreneurs. Alternative lenders have stepped in to fill this gap, but do not operate under the same regulations as traditional lenders. Since the 2008 Great Recession, many lenders started requiring business owners to personally sign for their business debt. Lenders are within their right to require co-signatories, however a personal guarantee defeats the purpose of an LLC and is antithetical to the purpose of entity formation. Given the lack of access to traditional business funding and the current trend of requiring personal guarantees, the need for dignified debt collection practices for individuals who incur debt for their business is necessary as small businesses do not have the same protections as consumers in the collection of a business debt. SB 1286 would extend the consumer debt collection protections provided under the Rosenthal Act to small business owners.
- BACKGROUND
This bill seeks to extend the scope of the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“Rosenthal Act”) to certain commercial debts. At its essence, the Rosenthal Act seeks to protect consumers from unfair and deceptive practices by a person collecting consumer debt. The law prohibits or restricts a variety of activities designed to intimidate or annoy, such as calling a debtor in the middle of the night; letting a phone ring incessantly; threatening actions that the debt collector cannot or does not plan to take; threatening or using violence; contacting a debtor’s friends, employers, or extended family to notify them of the debtor’s debt; and using obscene or threatening language. The law also prohibits various false representations, unfair practices, and improper use of judicial proceedings.
The remedies provided by the Rosenthal Act are fairly modest. Nothing in the Rosenthal Act allows for the forgiveness or cancellation of debt. The law provides avenues to avoid liability in the case of unintentional errors and a 15-day right to cure any violation. If a debt collector violates the law, they may be found liable for actual damages sustained by the debtor, but often such damages are related to stress and not monetary in nature. For a debt collector who willfully and knowingly violates the law, the Rosenthal Act provides a minimum liability of $100 and maximum liability of $1,000, in addition to any actual damages incurred and reasonable attorney’s fees.
- EXPANDING THE SCOPE OF ROSENTHAL
This bill adds specified commercial debts to the scope of the Rosenthal Act, which would grant the same protections to persons owing these commercial debts as are provided by existing law to persons owing consumer debt. The current version of the bill takes one approach to expansion, but the author has agreed to an alternative that should prove easier for industry to comply with.
The current version of the bill aims to define the expanded scope of Rosenthal using the concept of “small business” as the new category of debtors who would be covered. A small business is defined to have no more than 100 employees and no greater than $15 million in annual revenue over the previous three years. Debt collectors and financial institutions that are required to comply with Rosenthal have pointed out that identifying whether a given debtor is a small business may prove complicated. What if a small business grows above a given threshold, thus making it no longer a small business? What if a larger business falls below the required thresholds, thus making it now a small business? Does it matter if the business was a small business when the debt originated? Or does it only matter whether the small business meets the required criteria when a given collections action takes place? Is the debt collector expected to constantly ask questions about the debtor’s number of employees and annual revenue and accept any answer from the debtor as true?
Given these complications, the author has agreed to amend this bill to define the scope of newly covered debtors in a manner that creditors and collectors should easily be able to identify. As proposed to be amended, this bill will expand the scope of Rosenthal to cover debts that meet all of the following criteria:
- Who owes? – The debt must be owed by a natural person. The author intends to cover debts owed directly by a natural person or where a natural person has co-signed or provided a personal guarantee on a credit product. The author does not intend to cover a debt owed by a business entity, such as a corporation or LLC, that does not contain a personal guarantee.
- What for? – The underlying credit transaction was undertaken “for use primarily for other than personal, family, or household purposes.” This phrase is used in the California Financing Law to distinguish a “commercial loan” from a “consumer loan.”
- Owed to whom? – The debt must be owed to a lender, a commercial financing provider, or a debt buyer. This keeps credit transactions between two non-financial businesses outside of the scope of Rosenthal, meaning a supplier that provides goods on credit will not be deemed a debt collector.
- How much is owed? – The underlying credit transaction that created the debt cannot exceed $500,000. This same threshold exists for the state’s commercial financing disclosure law and a law enacted last year that prohibits certain “junk fees” on commercial financing transactions.
- DOES THIS BILL EXPAND THE DEBT COLLECTOR LICENSING ACT?
Some opposition groups have asserted that this bill would require entities that do not collect consumer debt but do collect certain commercial debts to be licensed under the state’s Debt Collector Licensing Act. This is not the author’s intent, nor is it an accurate assessment of how this bill interacts with existing law.
In 2020 the Legislature passed SB 908 (Wieckowski, Chapter 163, Statutes of 2020), which enacted the Debt Collector Licensing Act (DCLA). The DCLA copied definitions from Rosenthal to support the framework of the licensing law. Importantly, the DCLA did not reference definitions in Rosenthal, so changes to definitions in Rosenthal do not flow through to changes in the DCLA.
Existing law under the Rosenthal Act requires a debt collector to provide their licensing number in specified communications with a debtor. These requirements should have been conditioned on the debt collector being required under the DCLA to have a license, as a first-party creditor is considered a “debt collector” under Rosenthal but is exempt from licensure under the DCLA. This bill can clarify existing law and reflect that collecting commercial debt does not require licensure by adding “if applicable” throughout the Rosenthal Act wherever the law requires the disclosure of the licensure number of a debt collector. This amendment is suggested in Comment #8 below.
- IS THE ROSENTHAL ACT APPROPRIATE FOR COMMERCIAL DEBT?
The Rosenthal Act was enacted in 1977 to regulate the collection of consumer debt. Some of its provisions, such as prohibitions on threats and harassment, can be readily applied to collections related to commercial debt. Other provisions, however, may be less suitable. For example, one provision prohibits a debt collector from communicating with a debtor’s employer, which does not contemplate a situation where the debtor is self-employed and the debt is related to the debtor’s commercial activities. Additionally, the Rosenthal Act incorporates by reference provisions of the Federal Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA), which covers consumer debt and cannot be used as a basis for a person collecting a commercial debt to “comply” with. Amendments to make these provisions apply only to consumer debt are recommended in Comment #8 below.[1]
Creditors and debt collectors that would be affected by this bill have provided initial feedback about additional provisions of the Rosenthal Act that may need to be clarified in their application to commercial debt or made to apply only to consumer debt. Amendments recommended in this analysis are intended to address many concerns outlined in letters sent to the Committee, but this bill remains a work-in-progress with stakeholders that need time to more fully digest the provisions of the bill and how they would comply with the law. As this bill moves through the legislative process, the author is encouraged to continue working with concerned stakeholders with the goal of achieving clear and workable language that allows well-intended actors to understand their compliance obligations, while ensuring that small business owners are protected from unfair and deceptive debt collection practices.
- ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT
A coalition of small business advocacy and consumer law organizations, led by East Bay Community Law Center, write in support:
A micro-business is a firm with five or fewer employees, started for $50,000 or less in initial capital and that may not have access to traditional commercial loans. In California, 3.2 million microbusinesses have no employees. These businesses typically lack access to sophisticated legal resources to help them navigate the lending landscape. Small Business Majority opinion polling found 74% of small business owners feel that while online lending has opened up new sources of capital, these lenders should be regulated to ensure small businesses are protected from predatory practices. New scientific opinion polling sheds more light on small business owners’ views regarding the lending landscape, and shows that small business owners are broadly supportive of a range of policies that would support responsible lending practices while helping them access the capital they need to launch and grow their businesses…
Given the lack of access to traditional business funding and the current trend of requiring personal guarantees, the need for dignified debt collection practices for individuals who incur debt for their business is necessary as small businesses do not have the same protections as consumers in the collection of a business debt.
- ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION
A coalition of lenders, including the California Bankers Association, writes in opposition:
SB 1286 proposes to incorporate business debts into Rosenthal, an act enforced through the least sophisticated consumer standard. By definition, a business is not a consumer… it may be more appropriate to consider alternative methods to accomplish the goal of creating additional criteria for collection of commercial debts owed by a small business.
Consumer debt versus commercial debt is not an apples-to-apples comparison. Business owners are generally entrusted with a higher credit line than traditional consumers due to the rigorous requirements and sophistication needed to access a commercial purpose loan. Because Rosenthal provides oversight over the collection of consumer debts, many of the act’s provisions [are] impractical or are simply impossible in the context of the collection of commercial debts…
After discussing several specific examples of Rosenthal provisions that are arguably ill-suited for commercial debt collection, the letter continues:
[A]dding commercial debts owed by a small business into the Rosenthal framework is not a simple and direct addition, and in fact, represents a substantial change to existing law that may ultimately harm those that SB 1286 attempts to help. If the goal of the measure is to prevent fraudulent behavior in the collection of commercial debts owed by a small business, we would look forward to participation in stakeholder meetings that contemplate alternative approaches that do not present this level of conflict and impracticality.
- AMENDMENTS
Committee staff recommends the following amendments, which if approved by the Committee, will be taken in the Senate Judiciary Committee due to timing constraints.
- Clarify the definition of “debtor” in Section 1788.2(h) to read:
(1) Except as provided in Section 1788.18, the The term “debtor” means a natural person from whom a debt collector seeks to collect a covered debt that is due and owing or alleged to be due and owing from that person.
(2) In relation to a covered commercial debt, a “debtor” includes a natural person who guarantees an obligation related to a covered commercial credit transaction.
(3) A “debtor” does not include a corporation or limited liability company.
- Delete “small business” from the bill and restructure the concept of “covered debt” by amending subdivisions (l) through (p) of Section 1788.2 as follows:
(l) The term “covered debt” means a consumer debt or a small business covered commercial debt.
(m) The term “covered credit” means consumer credit or small business covered commercial credit.
Delete subdivision (n) entirely.
(o) The terms “small business covered commercial debt” and “small business covered commercial credit” mean money, property, or their equivalent, due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person to a lender, a commercial financing provider as defined in Financial Code Section 22800, or a debt buyer as defined in Section 1788.50, by reason of a small business covered commercial credit transaction.
(p) The term “small business covered commercial credit transaction” means a transaction between a small business or small business owner person and another person in which property, services, or money, of a total value of no more than $500,000, is acquired on credit by that small business or small business owner person from the other person primarily for purposes related to the activities of the small business for use primarily for other than personal, family, or household purposes.
- Acknowledge that not every “debt collector” subject to the Rosenthal Act is required to have a license pursuant to the DCLA. In Sections 1788.11 and 1788.14.5, add “if applicable” after references to a debt collector license number.
- Make subdivision (a) of Section 1788.12 and Section 1788.17 apply to a consumer debt only, rather than a covered debt.
- Provide a delayed implementation date of July 1, 2025, for the provisions of Section 1788.14.5 to apply to covered commercial debt.
- Delete amendments to subdivision (i) of Section 1788.18 made by this bill, restoring the clarification in existing law of the applicability of this section to debtors that are not natural persons.
- DOUBLE-REFERRAL
This bill is double referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
- PRIOR AND RELATED LEGISLATION
SB 1482 (Glazer) of this legislative session expands the scope of the California Licensing Law to cover specified commercial financing transactions offered to small businesses and establishes requirements and prohibitions on commercial financing providers and brokers engaged in such transactions. SB 1482 is scheduled to be heard by this committee during the same hearing as this bill.
SB 869 (Glazer) of this legislative session was substantively similar to SB 1482. The bill passed this committee in January of this year with a unanimous 6-0 vote and the Senate Judiciary Committee on a 10-0 vote, but subsequently was held by the Senate Appropriations Committee.
SB 33 (Glazer, Chapter 376, Statutes of 2023) made permanent the annualized interest rate disclosure required by SB 1235 of 2018.
SB 1324 (Durazo) of the 2021-22 session would have added rental debt as a consumer debt covered by the Rosenthal Act, thus requiring a landlord or third party collecting rental debt on behalf of a landlord to comply with the Rosenthal Act. The bill passed this committee, but subsequently was held by the Senate Appropriations Committee.
SB 187 (Wieckowski, Chapter 545, Statutes of 2019) provides that a mortgage debt is a consumer debt for the purposes of the Rosenthal Act and removes an exemption in the Rosenthal Act for attorneys who regularly, in the ordinary course of business, collect debts on behalf of themselves or others.
SB 1235 (Glazer, Chapter 1011, Statutes of 2018) established a first-in-the-nation disclosure framework that applies to a variety of financing products offered to small business borrowers, including a requirement to disclose the annualized rate percentage of financing.
LIST OF REGISTERED SUPPORT/OPPOSITION
Support
East Bay Community Law Center (co-sponsor)
Cameo - California Association for Micro Enterprise Opportunity (co-sponsor)
Consumer Federation of California (co-sponsor)
Small Business Majority (co-sponsor)
Berkeley Law & Organizing Collective
Bet Tzedek Legal Services
California Low-income Consumer Federation
Consumer Attorneys of California
Decosimo Law
Housing and Economic Rights Advocates (HERA)
Ica
LA Cocina
Microenterprise Collaborative of Inland Southern California
Public Law Center
Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center
San Juan Capistrano Chamber of Commerce
Sonya Yruel Photography
The Lisa B Company
25 Individuals
Opposition
American Financial Services Association
California Association of Collectors, INC
California Bankers Association
California Chamber of Commerce
California Community Banking Network
California Credit Union League
California Creditors Bar Association
California Financial Services Association
California Mortgage Bankers Association
-- END --
If provisions of the FDCPA are useful in filling any gaps left by Rosenthal in protecting commercial debtors, the author may adapt and recast those provisions in this bill to apply to covered commercial debts. ↑
Discussed in Hearing
Senate Floor
Assembly Floor
Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary
Assembly Standing Committee on Banking and Finance
Senate Floor
Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary
Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary
Senate Standing Committee on Banking and Financial Institutions
Bill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):