SB 577: Insurance.
- Session Year: 2023-2024
- House: Senate
- Latest Version Date: 2024-09-22
Current Status:
Passed
(2024-09-22: Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 444, Statutes of 2024.)
Introduced
In Committee
First Chamber
In Committee
Second Chamber
Enacted
(1)Existing law generally regulates classes of insurance, including life insurance and annuities. Existing law, beginning on January 1, 2025, requires a life agent, licensed on or after January 1, 2024, engaging in the sale of specified life insurance policies on or after January 1, 2025, to complete specified hours of life insurance training courses before soliciting consumers to sell these life insurance policies. Existing law requires a life agent, engaging in the sale of variable life insurance policies, to complete specified hours of training before renewing their license and applies these training provisions to licenses that are issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2025.
This bill would clarify that the above-described training provisions apply to life agents selling individual life insurance policies and individual variable life insurance policies, as specified.
(2)Existing law authorizes service of legal process, notices, or other specified papers to be made in specified circumstances by delivering 2 copies to the commissioner or the commissioners deputy, accompanied by payment of $12.
This bill would instead authorize service of legal process, notices, or other specified papers to be made in specified circumstances by delivering 2 copies to the commissioner, the commissioners deputy, or the commissioners designated agent for service of process, accompanied by payment of a substituted service fee determined by the commissioner.
(3)Existing law prohibits knowingly employing runners, cappers, steerers, or other persons to procure clients or patients to perform or obtain services or benefits under workers compensation coverage or a contract of insurance or that will be the basis for a claim against an insured individual or their insurer. Existing law authorizes a district attorney, the Insurance Commissioner, or an interested person to bring a civil action for a violation of that provision. If the district attorney elects not to pursue the matter due to insufficient resources, existing law authorizes the commissioner to proceed with the action. Existing law requires a copy of a complaint filed by an interested person to remain under seal for at least 60 days. Under existing law, an action brought by an interested person may be dismissed only if the court and the district attorney or the commissioner give written consent to the dismissal and their reasons for consenting.
This bill would authorize the commissioner to proceed with an action if the district attorney elects not to pursue the matter for any reason, and would eliminate the requirement that the district attorney or commissioner give their reasons for consenting to dismissal of an action brought by an interested person. The bill would clarify that a complaint filed by an interested person is required to remain under seal for at least 60 days from the date of service on the district attorney and commissioner.
(4)Existing law exempts from requirements for providing insurance set forth in the Insurance Code firefighters, police officers, and peace officers benefit and relief associations that comply with specified criteria, including, among other things, a requirement that the membership consist solely of peace officers, members of police or fire departments, and emergency medical personnel employed by fire departments, as specified. Existing law prohibits these associations from operating or doing business in the state without a certificate of authority. Existing law requires an association to renew its certificate of authority on or before July 1, 2019, and every 5 years thereafter.
This bill would, instead, require an association to renew its certificate of authority within 30 days after a change in name or address or before a merger.
(5)Existing law sets forth procedures for a special motion to strike in a civil cause of action arising from an act in furtherance of a persons right of petition or free speech and for offers to compromise before commencement of a civil trial or arbitration. Existing law exempts from these procedures an enforcement action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Attorney General, a district attorney, or a city attorney, acting as a public prosecutor.
This bill would additionally exempt from these procedures an enforcement action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Insurance Commissioner.
(6)This bill would make technical changes to eliminate outdated references and correct errors.
(1)Existing law generally regulates classes of insurance, including life insurance and annuities. Existing law, beginning on January 1, 2025, requires a life agent, licensed on or after January 1, 2024, engaging in the sale of specified life insurance policies on or after January 1, 2025, to complete specified hours of life insurance training courses before soliciting consumers to sell these life insurance policies. Existing law requires a life agent, engaging in the sale of variable life insurance policies, to complete specified hours of training before renewing their license and applies these training provisions to licenses that are issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2025.
This bill would clarify that the above-described training provisions apply to life agents selling individual life insurance policies and individual variable life insurance policies, as specified.
(2)Existing law authorizes service of legal process, notices, or other specified papers to be made in specified circumstances by delivering 2 copies to the commissioner or the commissioners deputy, accompanied by payment of $12.
This bill would instead authorize service of legal process, notices, or other specified papers to be made in specified circumstances by delivering 2 copies to the commissioner, the commissioners deputy, or the commissioners designated agent for service of process, accompanied by payment of a substituted service fee determined by the commissioner.
(3)Existing law prohibits knowingly employing runners, cappers, steerers, or other persons to procure clients or patients to perform or obtain services or benefits under workers compensation coverage or a contract of insurance or that will be the basis for a claim against an insured individual or their insurer. Existing law authorizes a district attorney, the Insurance Commissioner, or an interested person to bring a civil action for a violation of that provision. If the district attorney elects not to pursue the matter due to insufficient resources, existing law authorizes the commissioner to proceed with the action. Existing law requires a copy of a complaint filed by an interested person to remain under seal for at least 60 days. Under existing law, an action brought by an interested person may be dismissed only if the court and the district attorney or the commissioner give written consent to the dismissal and their reasons for consenting.
This bill would authorize the commissioner to proceed with an action if the district attorney elects not to pursue the matter for any reason, and would eliminate the requirement that the district attorney or commissioner give their reasons for consenting to dismissal of an action brought by an interested person. The bill would clarify that a complaint filed by an interested person is required to remain under seal for at least 60 days from the date of service on the district attorney and commissioner.
(4)Existing law exempts from requirements for providing insurance set forth in the Insurance Code firefighters, police officers, and peace officers benefit and relief associations that comply with specified criteria, including, among other things, a requirement that the membership consist solely of peace officers, members of police or fire departments, and emergency medical personnel employed by fire departments, as specified. Existing law prohibits these associations from operating or doing business in the state without a certificate of authority. Existing law requires an association to renew its certificate of authority on or before July 1, 2019, and every 5 years thereafter.
This bill would, instead, require an association to renew its certificate of authority within 30 days after a change in name or address or before a merger.
(5)Existing law sets forth procedures for a special motion to strike in a civil cause of action arising from an act in furtherance of a persons right of petition or free speech and for offers to compromise before commencement of a civil trial or arbitration. Existing law exempts from these procedures an enforcement action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Attorney General, a district attorney, or a city attorney, acting as a public prosecutor.
This bill would additionally exempt from these procedures an enforcement action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Insurance Commissioner.
(6)This bill would make technical changes to eliminate outdated references and correct errors.
(1)Existing law generally regulates classes of insurance, including life insurance and annuities. Existing law, beginning on January 1, 2025, requires a life agent, licensed on or after January 1, 2024, engaging in the sale of specified life insurance policies on or after January 1, 2025, to complete specified hours of life insurance training courses before soliciting consumers to sell these life insurance policies. Existing law requires a life agent, engaging in the sale of variable life insurance policies, to complete specified hours of training before renewing their license and applies these training provisions to licenses that are issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2025.
This bill would clarify that the above-described training provisions apply to life agents selling individual life insurance policies and individual variable life insurance policies, as specified.
(2)Existing law regulates home protection companies that issue home protection contracts to repair or replace components, systems, and appliances of a home for a specified period of time. Existing law authorizes the commissioner to examine the business and affairs of a home protection company before licensure and at other times as necessary.This bill would additionally authorize the commissioner to request a home protection company furnish to the department a financial audit by an independent certified public accountant.(3)(2)Existing law authorizes service of legal process, notices, or other specified papers to be made in specified circumstances by delivering 2 copies to the commissioner or the commissioners deputy, accompanied by payment of $12.
This bill would instead authorize service of legal process, notices, or other specified papers to be made in specified circumstances by delivering 2 copies to the commissioner, the commissioners deputy, or the commissioners designated agent for service of process, accompanied by payment of a substituted service fee determined by the commissioner.
(4)(3)Existing law prohibits knowingly employing runners, cappers, steerers, or other persons to procure clients or patients to perform or obtain services or benefits under workers compensation coverage or a contract of insurance or that will be the basis for a claim against an insured individual or their insurer. Existing law authorizes a district attorney, the Insurance Commissioner, or an interested person to bring a civil action for a violation of that provision. If the district attorney elects not to pursue the matter due to insufficient resources, existing law authorizes the commissioner to proceed with the action. Existing law requires a copy of a complaint filed by an interested person to remain under seal for at least 60 days. Under existing law, an action brought by an interested person may be dismissed only if the court and the district attorney or the commissioner give written consent to the dismissal and their reasons for consenting.
This bill would authorize the commissioner to proceed with an action if the district attorney elects not to pursue the matter for any reason, and would eliminate the requirement that the district attorney or commissioner give their reasons for consenting to dismissal of an action brought by an interested person. The bill would clarify that a complaint filed by an interested person is required to remain under seal for at least 60 days from the date of service on the district attorney and commissioner.
(5)(4)Existing law exempts from requirements for providing insurance set forth in the Insurance Code firefighters, police officers, and peace officers benefit and relief associations that comply with specified criteria, including, among other things, a requirement that the membership consist solely of peace officers, members of police or fire departments, and emergency medical personnel employed by fire departments, as specified. Existing law prohibits these associations from operating or doing business in the state without a certificate of authority. Existing law requires an association to renew its certificate of authority on or before July 1, 2019, and every 5 years thereafter.
This bill would, instead, require an association to renew its certificate of authority within 30 days after a change in name or address or before a merger.
(6)(5)Existing law sets forth procedures for a special motion to strike in a civil cause of action arising from an act in furtherance of a persons right of petition or free speech and for offers to compromise before commencement of a civil trial or arbitration. Existing law exempts from these procedures an enforcement action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Attorney General, a district attorney, or a city attorney, acting as a public prosecutor.
This bill would additionally exempt from these procedures an enforcement action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Insurance Commissioner.
(7)(6)This bill would make technical changes to eliminate outdated references and correct errors.
(1)Existing law generally regulates classes of insurance, including life insurance and annuities. Existing law, beginning on January 1, 2025, requires a life agent, licensed on or after January 1, 2024, engaging in the sale of specified life insurance policies on or after January 1, 2025, to complete specified hours of life insurance training courses before soliciting consumers to sell these life insurance policies. Existing law requires a life agent, engaging in the sale of variable life insurance policies, to complete specified hours of training before renewing their license and applies these training provisions to licenses that are issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2025.
This bill would clarify that the above-described training provisions apply to life agents selling individual life insurance policies and individual variable life insurance policies, as specified.
(2)Existing law regulates home protection companies that issue home protection contracts to repair or replace components, systems, and appliances of a home for a specified period of time. Existing law authorizes the commissioner to examine the business and affairs of a home protection company before licensure and at other times as necessary.
This bill would additionally authorize the commissioner to request a home protection company furnish to the department a financial audit by an independent certified public accountant.
(3)Existing law authorizes service of legal process, notices, or other specified papers to be made in specified circumstances by delivering 2 copies to the commissioner or the commissioners deputy, accompanied by payment of $12.
This bill would instead authorize service of legal process, notices, or other specified papers to be made in specified circumstances by delivering 2 copies to the commissioner, the commissioners deputy, or the commissioners designated agent for service of process, accompanied by payment of a substituted service fee determined by the commissioner.
(4)Existing law prohibits knowingly employing runners, cappers, steerers, or other persons to procure clients or patients to perform or obtain services or benefits under workers compensation coverage or a contract of insurance or that will be the basis for a claim against an insured individual or their insurer. Existing law authorizes a district attorney, the Insurance Commissioner, or an interested person to bring a civil action for a violation of that provision. If the district attorney elects not to pursue the matter due to insufficient resources, existing law authorizes the commissioner to proceed with the action. Existing law requires a copy of a complaint filed by an interested person to remain under seal for at least 60 days. Under existing law, an action brought by an interested person may be dismissed only if the court and the district attorney or the commissioner give written consent to the dismissal and their reasons for consenting.
This bill would authorize the commissioner to proceed with an action if the district attorney elects not to pursue the matter for any reason, and would eliminate the requirement that the district attorney or commissioner give their reasons for consenting to dismissal of an action brought by an interested person. The bill would clarify that a complaint filed by an interested person is required to remain under seal for at least 60 days from the date of service on the district attorney and commissioner.
(5)Existing law exempts from requirements for providing insurance set forth in the Insurance Code firefighters, police officers, and peace officers benefit and relief associations that comply with specified criteria, including, among other things, a requirement that the membership consist solely of peace officers, members of police or fire departments, and emergency medical personnel employed by fire departments, as specified. Existing law prohibits these associations from operating or doing business in the state without a certificate of authority. Existing law requires an association to renew its certificate of authority on or before July 1, 2019, and every 5 years thereafter.
This bill would, instead, require an association to renew its certificate of authority within 30 days after a change in name or address or before a merger.
(6)Existing law sets forth procedures for a special motion to strike in a civil cause of action arising from an act in furtherance of a persons right of petition or free speech and for offers to compromise before commencement of a civil trial or arbitration. Existing law exempts from these procedures an enforcement action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Attorney General, a district attorney, or a city attorney, acting as a public prosecutor.
This bill would additionally exempt from these procedures an enforcement action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Insurance Commissioner.
(7)This bill would make technical changes to eliminate outdated references and correct errors.
Existing law establishes the California Fire Service Training and Education Program in the office of the State Fire Marshal. Existing law requires the State Fire Marshal, with policy guidance and advice from the State Board of Fire Services, to carry out the management of the program. Existing law authorizes the State Fire Marshal to, among other things, establish and collect admission fees and other fees that may be necessary to be charged for seminars, conferences, and specialized training given, as provided. Existing law also authorizes the State Fire Marshal to establish and collect fees to implement the California Fire and Arson Training Act, which requires the State Fire Marshal to, among other things, establish and make recommendations related to minimum standards for fire protection personnel and fire personnel instructors, develop course curricula for arson, fire technology, and apprenticeship training, and promote the California Fire Academy System, as provided. This bill would instead authorize the State Fire Marshal to establish and collect the admission fees and other fees associated with the California Fire Service Training and Education Program, and to establish the fees to implement the California Fire and Arson Training Act, only to the extent that other private funding sources are insufficient to cover the necessary costs of the activities eligible to be paid from those fees.Existing law establishes the California Fire Service Training and Education Program in the office of the State Fire Marshal. Existing law requires the State Fire Marshal, with policy guidance and advice from the State Board of Fire Services, to carry out the management of the program. Existing law authorizes the State Fire Marshal to, among other things, establish and collect admission fees and other fees that may be necessary to be charged for seminars, conferences, and specialized training given, as provided. Existing law also authorizes the State Fire Marshal to establish and collect fees to implement the California Fire and Arson Training Act, which requires the State Fire Marshal to, among other things, establish and make recommendations related to minimum standards for fire protection personnel and fire personnel instructors, develop course curricula for arson, fire technology, and apprenticeship training, and promote the California Fire Academy System, as provided.
This bill would instead authorize the State Fire Marshal to establish and collect the admission fees and other fees associated with the California Fire Service Training and Education Program, and to establish the fees to implement the California Fire and Arson Training Act, only to the extent that state appropriations and other private funding sources are insufficient to cover the necessary costs of the activities eligible to be paid from those fees.
Existing law establishes the California Fire Service Training and Education Program in the office of the State Fire Marshal. Existing law requires the State Fire Marshal, with policy guidance and advice from the State Board of Fire Services, to carry out the management of the program. Existing law authorizes the State Fire Marshal to, among other things, establish and collect admission fees and other fees that may be necessary to be charged for seminars, conferences, and specialized training given, as provided. Existing law also authorizes the State Fire Marshal to establish and collect fees to implement the California Fire and Arson Training Act, which requires the State Fire Marshal to, among other things, establish and make recommendations related to minimum standards for fire protection personnel and fire personnel instructors, develop course curricula for arson, fire technology, and apprenticeship training, and promote the California Fire Academy System, as provided.
This bill would instead authorize the State Fire Marshal to establish and collect the admission fees and other fees associated with the California Fire Service Training and Education Program, and to establish the fees to implement the California Fire and Arson Training Act, only to the extent that state appropriations and other funding sources are insufficient to cover the necessary costs of the activities eligible to be paid from those fees.
(a)The Legislature finds and declares that there has been a disturbing increase in lawsuits brought primarily to chill the valid exercise of the constitutional rights of freedom of speech and petition for the redress of grievances. The Legislature finds and declares that it is in the public interest to encourage continued participation in matters of public significance, and that this participation should not be chilled through abuse of the judicial process. To this end, this section shall be construed broadly.
(b)(1)A cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in furtherance of the persons right of petition or free speech under the United States Constitution or the California Constitution in connection with a public issue shall be subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established that there is a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim.
(2)In making its determination, the court shall consider the pleadings, and supporting and opposing affidavits stating the facts upon which the liability or defense is based.
(3)If the court determines that the plaintiff has established a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim, neither that determination nor the fact of that determination shall be admissible in evidence at any later stage of the case, or in any subsequent action, and no burden of proof or degree of proof otherwise applicable shall be affected by that determination in any later stage of the case or in any subsequent proceeding.
(c)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), in any action subject to subdivision (b), a prevailing defendant on a special motion to strike shall be entitled to recover that defendants attorneys fees and costs. If the court finds that a special motion to strike is frivolous or is solely intended to cause unnecessary delay, the court shall award costs and reasonable attorneys fees to a plaintiff prevailing on the motion, pursuant to Section 128.5.
(2)A defendant who prevails on a special motion to strike in an action subject to paragraph (1) shall not be entitled to attorneys fees and costs if that cause of action is brought pursuant to Section 11130, 11130.3, 54960, or 54960.1 of the Government Code, or pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 7923.100) of Part 4 of Division 10 of Title 1 of the Government Code. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to prevent a prevailing defendant from recovering attorneys fees and costs pursuant to Section 7923.115, 11130.5, or 54960.5 of the Government Code.
(d)This section shall not apply to any enforcement action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Attorney General, Insurance Commissioner, district attorney, or city attorney, acting as a public prosecutor.
(e)As used in this section, act in furtherance of a persons right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue includes: (1) any written or oral statement or writing made before a legislative, executive, or judicial proceeding, or any other official proceeding authorized by law, (2) any written or oral statement or writing made in connection with an issue under consideration or review by a legislative, executive, or judicial body, or any other official proceeding authorized by law, (3) any written or oral statement or writing made in a place open to the public or a public forum in connection with an issue of public interest, or (4) any other conduct in furtherance of the exercise of the constitutional right of petition or the constitutional right of free speech in connection with a public issue or an issue of public interest.
(f)The special motion may be filed within 60 days of the service of the complaint or, in the courts discretion, at any later time upon terms it deems proper. The motion shall be scheduled by the clerk of the court for a hearing not more than 30 days after the service of the motion unless the docket conditions of the court require a later hearing.
(g)All discovery proceedings in the action shall be stayed upon the filing of a notice of motion made pursuant to this section. The stay of discovery shall remain in effect until notice of entry of the order ruling on the motion. The court, on noticed motion and for good cause shown, may order that specified discovery be conducted notwithstanding this subdivision.
(h)For purposes of this section, complaint includes cross-complaint and petition, plaintiff includes cross-complainant and petitioner, and defendant includes cross-defendant and respondent.
(i)An order granting or denying a special motion to strike shall be appealable under Section 904.1.
(j)(1)Any party who files a special motion to strike pursuant to this section, and any party who files an opposition to a special motion to strike, shall, promptly upon so filing, transmit to the Judicial Council, by email or facsimile, a copy of the endorsed, filed caption page of the motion or opposition, a copy of any related notice of appeal or petition for a writ, and a conformed copy of any order issued pursuant to this section, including any order granting or denying a special motion to strike, discovery, or fees.
(2)The Judicial Council shall maintain a public record of information transmitted pursuant to this subdivision for at least three years, and may store the information on microfilm or other appropriate electronic media.
SEC. 2.Section 998 of the Code of Civil Procedure is amended to read:998.(a)The costs allowed under Sections 1031 and 1032 shall be withheld or augmented as provided in this section.
(b)Not less than 10 days prior to commencement of trial or arbitration (as provided in Section 1281 or 1295) of a dispute to be resolved by arbitration, any party may serve an offer in writing upon any other party to the action to allow judgment to be taken or an award to be entered in accordance with the terms and conditions stated at that time. The written offer shall include a statement of the offer, containing the terms and conditions of the judgment or award, and a provision that allows the accepting party to indicate acceptance of the offer by signing a statement that the offer is accepted. Any acceptance of the offer, whether made on the document containing the offer or on a separate document of acceptance, shall be in writing and shall be signed by counsel for the accepting party or, if not represented by counsel, by the accepting party.
(1)If the offer is accepted, the offer with proof of acceptance shall be filed and the clerk or the judge shall enter judgment accordingly. In the case of an arbitration, the offer with proof of acceptance shall be filed with the arbitrator or arbitrators who shall promptly render an award accordingly.
(2)If the offer is not accepted prior to trial or arbitration or within 30 days after it is made, whichever occurs first, it shall be deemed withdrawn, and cannot be given in evidence upon the trial or arbitration.
(3)For purposes of this subdivision, a trial or arbitration shall be deemed to be actually commenced at the beginning of the opening statement of the plaintiff or counsel, or, if there is no opening statement, at the time of the administering of the oath or affirmation to the first witness, or the introduction of any evidence.
(c)(1)If an offer made by a defendant is not accepted and the plaintiff fails to obtain a more favorable judgment or award, the plaintiff shall not recover their postoffer costs and shall pay the defendants costs from the time of the offer. In addition, in any action or proceeding other than an eminent domain action, the court or arbitrator, in its discretion, may require the plaintiff to pay a reasonable sum to cover postoffer costs of the services of expert witnesses, who are not regular employees of any party, actually incurred and reasonably necessary in either, or both, preparation for trial or arbitration, or during trial or arbitration, of the case by the defendant.
(2)(A)In determining whether the plaintiff obtains a more favorable judgment, the court or arbitrator shall exclude the postoffer costs.
(B)It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting subparagraph (A) to supersede the holding in Encinitas Plaza Real v. Knight, 209 Cal.App.3d 996, that attorneys fees awarded to the prevailing party were not costs for purposes of this section but were part of the judgment.
(d)If an offer made by a plaintiff is not accepted and the defendant fails to obtain a more favorable judgment or award in any action or proceeding other than an eminent domain action, the court or arbitrator, in its discretion, may require the defendant to pay a reasonable sum to cover postoffer costs of the services of expert witnesses, who are not regular employees of any party, actually incurred and reasonably necessary in either, or both, preparation for trial or arbitration, or during trial or arbitration, of the case by the plaintiff, in addition to plaintiffs costs.
(e)If an offer made by a defendant is not accepted and the plaintiff fails to obtain a more favorable judgment or award, the costs under this section, from the time of the offer, shall be deducted from any damages awarded in favor of the plaintiff. If the costs awarded under this section exceed the amount of the damages awarded to the plaintiff the net amount shall be awarded to the defendant and judgment or award shall be entered accordingly.
(f)Police officers shall be deemed to be expert witnesses for the purposes of this section. For purposes of this section, plaintiff includes a cross-complainant and defendant includes a cross-defendant. Any judgment or award entered pursuant to this section shall be deemed to be a compromise settlement.
(g)This chapter does not apply to either of the following:
(1)An offer that is made by a plaintiff in an eminent domain action.
(2)Any enforcement action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Attorney General, the Insurance Commissioner, a district attorney, or a city attorney, acting as a public prosecutor.
(h)The costs for services of expert witnesses for trial under subdivisions (c) and (d) shall not exceed those specified in Section 68092.5 of the Government Code.
(i)This section shall not apply to labor arbitrations filed pursuant to memoranda of understanding under the Ralph C. Dills Act (Chapter 10.3 (commencing with Section 3512) of Division 4 of Title 1 of the Government Code).
SEC. 3.Section 1749.81 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:1749.81.(a)A life agent licensed on or after January 1, 2024, who sells individual life insurance policies other than term life with no cash value shall satisfactorily complete four hours of training before soliciting individual consumers to sell those life insurance policies.
(b)A life agent who sells individual variable life insurance policies shall satisfactorily complete two hours of training before each license renewal. Completion of the four-hour annuity training required by Section 1749.8 does not satisfy the training required by this section. This training is in addition to, and is not a part of, the annuity training required by subdivision (b) of Section 1749.8. For resident licensees, this requirement shall count toward the licensees continuing education requirement, but may still result in completing more than the minimum number of continuing education hours set forth in this section.
(c)The training required by this section shall be approved by the commissioner and shall consist of topics related to the types of life insurance policies described in subdivisions (a) and (b) and California law, regulations, and requirements related to those life insurance policies, prohibited sales practices, and unfair trade practices. Subject matter determined by the commissioner to be primarily intended to promote the sale or marketing of life insurance policies shall not qualify for credit toward the training requirement. Any course or seminar that is disapproved under the provisions of this section shall be presumed invalid for credit toward the training requirement of this section unless it is approved in writing by the commissioner.
(d)This section shall become operative January 1, 2025, and applies to licenses that are issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2025.
SEC. 4.Section 1871.7 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:1871.7.(a)It is unlawful to knowingly employ runners, cappers, steerers, or other persons to procure clients or patients to perform or obtain services or benefits pursuant to Division 4 (commencing with Section 3200) of the Labor Code or to procure clients or patients to perform or obtain services or benefits under a contract of insurance or that will be the basis for a claim against an insured individual or their insurer.
(b)Every person who violates any provision of this section or Section 549, 550, or 551 of the Penal Code shall be subject, in addition to any other penalties that may be prescribed by law, to a civil penalty of not less than five thousand dollars ($5,000) nor more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000), plus an assessment of not more than three times the amount of each claim for compensation, as defined in Section 3207 of the Labor Code or pursuant to a contract of insurance. The court shall have the power to grant other equitable relief, including temporary injunctive relief, as is necessary to prevent the transfer, concealment, or dissipation of illegal proceeds, or to protect the public. The penalty prescribed in this paragraph shall be assessed for each fraudulent claim presented to an insurance company by a defendant and not for each violation.
(c)The penalties set forth in subdivision (b) are intended to be remedial rather than punitive, and shall not preclude, nor be precluded by, a criminal prosecution for the same conduct. If the court finds, after considering the goals of disgorging unlawful profit, restitution, compensating the state for the costs of investigation and prosecution, and alleviating the social costs of increased insurance rates due to fraud, that such a penalty would be punitive and would preclude, or be precluded by, a criminal prosecution, the court shall reduce that penalty appropriately.
(d)The district attorney or commissioner may bring a civil action under this section. Before the commissioner may bring that action, the commissioner shall be required to present the evidence obtained to the appropriate local district attorney for possible criminal or civil filing. If the district attorney elects not to pursue the matter, then the commissioner may proceed with the action.
(e)(1)Any interested persons, including an insurer, may bring a civil action for a violation of this section for the person and for the State of California. The action shall be brought in the name of the state. The action may be dismissed only if the court and the district attorney or the commissioner, whichever is participating, give written consent to the dismissal.
(2)A copy of the complaint and written disclosure of substantially all material evidence and information the person possesses shall be served on the district attorney and commissioner. The complaint shall be filed in camera, shall remain under seal for at least 60 days from the date of service on the district attorney and commissioner, and shall not be served on the defendant until the court so orders. The local district attorney or commissioner may elect to intervene and proceed with the action within 60 days after the district attorney or commissioner receives both the complaint and the material evidence and information. If more than one governmental entity elects to intervene, the district attorney shall have precedence.
(3)The district attorney or commissioner may, for good cause shown, move the court for extensions of the time during which the complaint remains under seal under paragraph (2). The motions may be supported by affidavits or other submissions in camera. The defendant shall not be required to respond to any complaint filed under this section until 20 days after the complaint is unsealed and served upon the defendant.
(4)Before the expiration of the 60-day period or any extensions obtained under paragraph (3), the district attorney or commissioner shall either:
(A)Proceed with the action, in which case the action shall be conducted by the district attorney or commissioner.
(B)Notify the court that it declines to take over the action, in which case the person bringing the action shall have the right to conduct the action.
(5)When a person or governmental agency brings an action under this section, no person other than the district attorney or commissioner may intervene or bring a related action based on the facts underlying the pending action unless that action is authorized by another statute or common law.
(f)(1)If the district attorney or commissioner proceeds with the action, the district attorney or commissioner shall have the primary responsibility for prosecuting the action, and shall not be bound by an act of the person bringing the action. That person shall have the right to continue as a party to the action, subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (2).
(2)(A)The district attorney or commissioner may dismiss the action notwithstanding the objections of the person initiating the action if the person has been notified by the district attorney or commissioner of the filing of the motion, and the court has provided the person with an opportunity for a hearing on the motion.
(B)The district attorney or commissioner may settle the action with the defendant notwithstanding the objections of the person initiating the action if the court determines, after a hearing, that the proposed settlement is fair, adequate, and reasonable under all the circumstances. Upon a showing of good cause, the hearing may be held in camera.
(C)Upon a showing by the district attorney or commissioner that unrestricted participation during the course of the litigation by the person initiating the action would interfere with or unduly delay the district attorneys or commissioners prosecution of the case, or would be repetitious, irrelevant, or for purposes of harassment, the court may, in its discretion, impose limitations on the persons participation, including, but not limited to, the following:
(i)Limiting the number of witnesses the person may call.
(ii)Limiting the length of the testimony of those witnesses.
(iii)Limiting the persons cross-examination of witnesses.
(iv)Otherwise limiting the participation by the person in the litigation.
(D)Upon a showing by the defendant that unrestricted participation during the course of the litigation by the person initiating the action would be for purposes of harassment or would cause the defendant undue burden or unnecessary expense, the court may limit the participation by the person in the litigation.
(3)If the district attorney or commissioner elects not to proceed with the action, the person who initiated the action shall have the right to conduct the action. If the district attorney or commissioner so requests, the district attorney or commissioner shall be served with copies of all pleadings filed in the action and shall be supplied with copies of all deposition transcripts, at the district attorneys or commissioners expense. When a person proceeds with the action, the court, without limiting the status and rights of the person initiating the action, may nevertheless permit the district attorney or commissioner to intervene at a later date upon a showing of good cause.
(4)If at any time both a civil action for penalties and equitable relief pursuant to this section and a criminal action are pending against a defendant for substantially the same conduct, whether brought by the government or a private party, the civil action shall be stayed until the criminal action has been concluded at the trial court level. The stay shall not preclude the court from granting or enforcing temporary equitable relief during the pendency of the actions. Whether or not the district attorney or commissioner proceeds with the action, upon a showing by the district attorney or commissioner that certain actions of discovery by the person initiating the action would interfere with a law enforcement or governmental agency investigation or prosecution of a criminal or civil matter arising out of the same facts, the court may stay discovery for a period of not more than 180 days. A hearing on a request for the stay shall be conducted in camera. The court may extend the 180-day period upon a further showing in camera that the agency has pursued the criminal or civil investigation or proceedings with reasonable diligence and any proposed discovery in the civil action will interfere with the ongoing criminal or civil investigation or proceedings.
(5)Notwithstanding subdivision (e), the district attorney or commissioner may elect to pursue its claim through any alternate remedy available to the district attorney or commissioner.
(g)(1)(A)(i)If the district attorney proceeds with an action brought by a person under subdivision (e), that person shall, subject to subparagraph (B), receive at least 30 percent but not more than 40 percent of the proceeds of the action or settlement of the claim, depending upon the extent to which the person substantially contributed to the prosecution of the action.
(ii)If the commissioner has brought an action or has proceeded with an action brought by another person under this section on or after January 1, 2006, the commissioner shall be entitled to attorneys fees and costs in addition to any judgment, regardless of the date that judgment is entered. The court shall determine and award the commissioner the amount of reasonable attorneys fees, including, but not limited to, reasonable fees for time expended by attorneys employed by the department and for costs incurred. Any attorneys fees or costs awarded to the commissioner and collected shall be deposited in the Insurance Fund. In cases in which the commissioner has intervened, the commissioner and the person bringing the claim may stipulate to an allocation. The court may allocate the funds pursuant to the stipulation if, after the courts ruling on objection by the district attorney, if any, the court finds it is in the interests of justice to follow the stipulation.
(iii)If the commissioner has proceeded with an action, if there is no stipulation regarding allocation, and if a judgment has been obtained or a settlement has been reached with the defendants, the court shall determine the allocation, upon motion of the commissioner or the person bringing the action, according to the following priority:
(I)The person bringing the action, regardless of whether that person paid money to the defendants as part of the acts alleged in the complaint, shall first receive the amount the court determines is reasonable for attorneys fees, costs, and expenses that the court determines to have been necessarily incurred.
(II)The commissioner shall receive the amount the court determines for reasonable attorneys fees and costs.
(III)If the person bringing the suit has paid moneys to the defendants as part of the acts alleged in the complaint, that person shall receive the amount paid to the defendants.
(IV)At least 30 percent, but not more than 40 percent, of the remaining assets or moneys, shall be allocated to the person bringing the action, depending upon the extent to which the person substantially contributed to the prosecution of the action.
(iv)Those portions of a judgment or settlement not distributed pursuant to this subdivision shall be paid to the General Fund of the state and, upon appropriation by the Legislature, shall be apportioned between the Department of Justice and the Department of Insurance for enhanced fraud investigation and prevention efforts.
(B)Where the action is one that the court finds to be based primarily on disclosures of specific information, other than information provided by the person bringing the action, relating to allegations or transactions in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing, in a legislative or administrative report, hearing, audit, or investigation, or from the news media, the court may award those sums that it considers appropriate, but in no case more than 10 percent of the proceeds, taking into account the significance of the information and the role of the person bringing the action in advancing the case to litigation.
(C)Any payment to a person under subparagraph (A) or under subparagraph (B) shall be made from the proceeds. The person shall also receive an amount for reasonable expenses that the court finds to have been necessarily incurred, plus reasonable attorneys fees and costs. All of those expenses, fees, and costs shall be awarded against the defendant.
(2)(A)If the district attorney or commissioner does not proceed with an action under this section, the person bringing the action or settling the claim shall receive an amount that the court decides is reasonable for collecting the civil penalty and damages. Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the amount shall not be less than 40 percent and not more than 50 percent of the proceeds of the action or settlement and shall be paid out of the proceeds. That person shall also receive an amount for reasonable expenses that the court finds to have been necessarily incurred, plus reasonable attorneys fees and costs. All of those attorneys fees and costs shall be imposed against the defendant. The parties shall serve the commissioner and the local district attorney with complete copies of any and all settlement agreements, and terms and conditions, for actions brought under this article at least 10 days prior to filing any motion for allocation with the court under this paragraph. The court may allocate the funds pursuant to the settlement agreement if, after the courts ruling on objection by the commissioner or the local district attorney, if any, the court finds it is in the interests of justice to follow the settlement agreement.
(B)If the person bringing the action, as a result of a violation of this section has paid money to the defendant or to an attorney acting on behalf of the defendant in the underlying claim, then the person shall be entitled to up to double the amount paid to the defendant or the attorney if that amount is greater than 50 percent of the proceeds. That person shall also receive an amount for reasonable expenses that the court finds to have been necessarily incurred, plus reasonable attorneys fees and costs. All of those expenses, fees, and costs shall be awarded against the defendant.
(3)If a local district attorney has proceeded with an action under this section, one-half of the penalties not awarded to a private party, as well as any costs awarded shall go to the treasurer of the appropriate county. Those funds shall be used to investigate and prosecute fraud, augmenting existing budgets rather than replacing them. All remaining funds shall go to the state and be deposited in the General Fund and, when appropriated by the Legislature, shall be apportioned between the Department of Justice and the Department of Insurance for enhanced fraud investigation and prevention efforts.
(4)Whether or not the district attorney or commissioner proceeds with the action, if the court finds that the action was brought by a person who planned and initiated the violation of this section, that person shall be dismissed from the civil action and shall not receive any share of the proceeds of the action. The dismissal shall not prejudice the right of the district attorney or commissioner to continue the action on behalf of the state.
(5)If the district attorney or commissioner does not proceed with the action, and the person bringing the action conducts the action, the court may award to the defendant its reasonable attorneys fees and expenses if the defendant prevails in the action and the court finds that the claim of the person bringing the action was clearly frivolous, clearly vexatious, or brought primarily for purposes of harassment.
(h)(1)In no event may a person bring an action under subdivision (e) that is based upon allegations or transactions that are the subject of a civil suit or an administrative civil money penalty proceeding in which the Attorney General, district attorney, or commissioner is already a party.
(2)(A)No court shall have jurisdiction over an action under this section based upon the public disclosure of allegations or transactions in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing in a legislative or administrative report, hearing, audit, or investigation, or from the news media, unless the action is brought by the Attorney General or the person bringing the action is an original source of the information.
(B)For purposes of this paragraph, original source means an individual who has direct and independent knowledge of the information on which the allegations are based and has voluntarily provided the information to the district attorney or commissioner before filing an action under this section that is based on the information.
(i)Except as provided in subdivision (j), the district attorney or commissioner is not liable for expenses that a person incurs in bringing an action under this section.
(j)In civil actions brought under this section in which the commissioner or a district attorney is a party, the court shall retain discretion to impose sanctions otherwise allowed by law, including the ability to order a party to pay expenses as provided in Sections 128.5 and 1028.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
(k)Any employee who is discharged, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed, or in any other manner discriminated against in the terms and conditions of employment by their employer because of lawful acts done by the employee on behalf of the employee or others in furtherance of an action under this section, including investigation for, initiation of, testimony for, or assistance in, an action filed or to be filed under this section, shall be entitled to all relief necessary to make the employee whole. That relief shall include reinstatement with the same seniority status the employee would have had but for the discrimination, two times the amount of backpay, interest on the backpay, and compensation for any special damages sustained as a result of the discrimination, including litigation costs and reasonable attorneys fees. An employee may bring an action in the appropriate superior court for the relief provided in this subdivision. The remedies under this section are in addition to any other remedies provided by existing law.
(l)(1)An action pursuant to this section may not be filed more than three years after the discovery of the facts constituting the grounds for commencing the action.
(2)Notwithstanding paragraph (1) no action may be filed pursuant to this section more than eight years after the commission of the act constituting a violation of this section or a violation of Section 549, 550, or 551 of the Penal Code.
SEC. 5.Section 10123.857 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10123.857.(a)A health insurer that issues, sells, renews, or offers a policy covering dental services, including a specialized health insurance policy covering dental services that offers a service via telehealth to an insured through a third-party corporate telehealth provider shall report to the department, in a manner specified by the department, all of the following for each product type:
(1)The total number of services delivered via telehealth by a third-party corporate telehealth provider.
(2)For each third-party corporate telehealth provider with which it contracts, the percentage of the third-party telehealth providers contracted providers available to the insurers insured that are also network providers.
(3)For each third-party corporate telehealth provider with which it contracts, the types of telehealth services utilized by insureds, including information on the gender and age of the insured, and any other information as determined by the department.
(b)A health insurer that issues, sells, renews, or offers a policy covering dental services, including a specialized health care policy covering dental services that offers a service via telehealth to an insured through a third-party corporate telehealth provider, shall disclose to the insured the impact of third-party telehealth visits on the insureds benefit limitations, including frequency limitations and the insureds annual maximum.
(c)Section 10123.856 shall not apply to specialized health insurance policies covering dental services.
(d)For the purposes of this section, third-party corporate telehealth provider means a corporation that provides dental services exclusively through a telehealth technology platform and has no physical location at which a patient can receive services, and is directly contracted with a health insurer that issues, sells, renews, or offers a policy, including a specialized health insurance policy, that covers dental services.
SEC. 6.Section 11401 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:11401.(a)An association shall not operate or do business in this state without a certificate of authority. The commissioner shall issue a certificate of authority to any association unless the commissioner determines, after examination, that it does not comply with the provisions of this chapter. The filing fee for the application for the certificate of authority shall be one thousand four hundred ten dollars ($1,410).
(b)An association shall renew its certificate of authority within 30 days after a change in name or address or before a merger.
(c)(1)The commissioner may revoke the certificate of authority for an association that failed to renew its certificate of authority in compliance with subdivision (b), after giving reasonable written notice mailed to the last address of the association registered with the department.
(2)The commissioner may revoke the certificate of authority for an association that has a dissolved, suspended, or otherwise inactive status according to the records of the Secretary of State, after giving reasonable written notice mailed to the last address of the association registered with the department.
(3)To obtain a reissue of a certificate of authority revoked pursuant to this subdivision, an association shall apply to the commissioner pursuant to subdivision (a).
SEC. 7.Section 12418.4 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:12418.4.(a)Sections 1667, 1668, 1669, 1670, 1729, 1729.2, 1738, 1738.5, 1742, 1743, and Article 6 (commencing with Section 12404), shall apply to all applicants or holders of a certificate of registration issued pursuant to this article.
(b)The department may revoke, suspend, restrict, or decline to issue a certificate of registration if it determines that the title marketing representative or applicant has violated provisions of Article 6 (commencing with Section 12404) pursuant to the due process and hearing requirements set forth in subdivision (c).
(c)Except as provided in Section 1669, a certificate of registration shall not be denied, restricted, suspended, or revoked without a hearing conducted in accordance with Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 11500) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(d)In addition to, or in lieu of, any other penalty that may be imposed under this article against a title marketing representative, the commissioner may bring an administrative action against a title marketing representative for any violation of the provisions of Article 6 (commencing with Section 12404). If a title marketing representative charged with a violation of Article 6 (commencing with Section 12404) is determined by the commissioner to have committed the violation, the commissioner may require the surrender of, temporarily suspend or revoke either permanently or temporarily the title marketing representatives certificate of registration, and, in addition, may impose a monetary penalty. Any payment of a monetary penalty pursuant to a settlement or final adjudication shall be made from the title marketing representatives personal funds and not by their employer either directly or through the title marketing representative. This article shall not preclude an action against a company that had actual knowledge of the violation by the title marketing representative. A title marketing representative who is issued a certificate of registration under this article may not engage in any activity that is otherwise prohibited through a separate entity controlled by the title marketing representative or by the company or entity that employs the title marketing representative.
(e)A title marketing representative who has their certificate of registration revoked by the department shall not be permitted to reapply for another certificate of registration with the department for five years from the date of revocation.
SEC. 8.Section 12931 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:12931.(a)Service of legal process, notices, or other papers described in or referred to by Section 1452, 1605, 1610, 1612, 11104, or 11105 may be made upon the commissioner in the instances enumerated in this section and under the circumstances prescribed in this section by delivering to the commissioner, the commissioners deputy, or the commissioners designated agent for service of process two copies thereof for each person or party defendant so served accompanied by payment of a substituted service fee as determined pursuant to Section 12978 for each person or party, and by complying with the other provisions of this section.
(b)The situations under which such service may be so made and the circumstances under which these provisions apply are:
(1)Where for any reason the person desiring to have service so made elects to serve the commissioner instead of the attorney in fact, as stipulated pursuant to Section 1323, of a reciprocal or interinsurance exchange, domestic, foreign, admitted, or nonadmitted.
(2)Where service is to be made on an admitted foreign or alien insurer, when service cannot be made on the principal statutory agent of such insurer duly appointed pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 1600) of Chapter 4 of Part 2 of Division 1 for reasons specified in Section 1604 or otherwise recognized by law.
(3)In actions against nonadmitted insurers, including nonadmitted fraternal benefit societies and reciprocals, under the circumstances described in Article 4 (commencing with Section 1610) of Chapter 4 of Part 2 of Division 1. This provision shall not apply to actions brought under insurance policies or certificates issued by nonadmitted insurers placed by surplus line brokers or special lines surplus line brokers where such insurance contract names a resident of this state as agent for service of process.
(4)In actions involving admitted and formerly admitted fraternal benefit societies as described in Section 11104.
(c)Upon receipt of two copies of the process, notice, or papers to be served and the fee above prescribed, the commissioner shall promptly mail one of the copies by certified mail (or by registered mail if it is addressed to an area outside of the United States where certified mail service is not available) to the defendant or person to be served at the last principal place of business of the defendant or person to be served, known to the commissioner by the commissioners official records in the case of a licensee; otherwise, in the case of a nonadmitted insurer, to its last principal place of business known to the commissioner from national directories or reference books or other reliable information available in the commissioners office. The commissioner shall keep a record of all services made upon the commissioner pursuant to this section. The other copy of the process, notice, or papers shall be retained among the commissioners official public records for a period not to exceed two years, absent special circumstances which in the commissioners judgment compel longer retention.
(d)Service made in the manner provided for in this section is valid and sufficient and gives jurisdiction over the person of a nonadmitted or unauthorized defendant, provided notice of such service and a copy of the process, notice, or papers being served are sent within 10 days thereafter by certified mail (or by registered mail if it is addressed to an area outside of the United States where certified mail service is not available) by plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney to the defendant at its last known principal place of business, and the receipt or the receipt of defendants agent for such copy, showing the name of the sender and the name and address of the addressee-defendant thereon, and the affidavit of plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney showing compliance with this section, are filed with the clerk of the court in which such action is pending on or before the date the defendant is required to appear, or within further time as the court may allow.
In case of service made pursuant to this section upon a licensee of the commissioner required by law to keep the licensees current business address or that of its agent for service of process on file with the commissioner, the service shall be valid if the commissioner mailed, postage prepaid, a copy of the process, notice, or papers to the defendant or licensee intended to be served to the licensees current address as shown by the commissioners records, or, in the case of an insurer, to its manager, president, or secretary, and an affidavit of compliance by plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney at law is made and filed at the place and within the time mentioned in this subdivision.
(e)A plaintiff or complainant shall not be entitled to a judgment by default in any action, suit, or proceeding in which service of process is effected in the manner provided in this section until the expiration of 30 days from the date on which the affidavit of compliance is filed.
(f)This section does not limit or abridge the right to serve any process, notice, papers, or demand upon any insurer in any other manner now or hereafter permitted by law.
(a)The Legislature finds and declares that there has been a disturbing increase in lawsuits brought primarily to chill the valid exercise of the constitutional rights of freedom of speech and petition for the redress of grievances. The Legislature finds and declares that it is in the public interest to encourage continued participation in matters of public significance, and that this participation should not be chilled through abuse of the judicial process. To this end, this section shall be construed broadly.
(b)(1)A cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in furtherance of the persons right of petition or free speech under the United States Constitution or the California Constitution in connection with a public issue shall be subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established that there is a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim.
(2)In making its determination, the court shall consider the pleadings, and supporting and opposing affidavits stating the facts upon which the liability or defense is based.
(3)If the court determines that the plaintiff has established a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim, neither that determination nor the fact of that determination shall be admissible in evidence at any later stage of the case, or in any subsequent action, and no burden of proof or degree of proof otherwise applicable shall be affected by that determination in any later stage of the case or in any subsequent proceeding.
(c)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), in any action subject to subdivision (b), a prevailing defendant on a special motion to strike shall be entitled to recover that defendants attorneys fees and costs. If the court finds that a special motion to strike is frivolous or is solely intended to cause unnecessary delay, the court shall award costs and reasonable attorneys fees to a plaintiff prevailing on the motion, pursuant to Section 128.5.
(2)A defendant who prevails on a special motion to strike in an action subject to paragraph (1) shall not be entitled to attorneys fees and costs if that cause of action is brought pursuant to Section 11130, 11130.3, 54960, or 54960.1 of the Government Code, or pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 7923.100) of Part 4 of Division 10 of Title 1 of the Government Code. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to prevent a prevailing defendant from recovering attorneys fees and costs pursuant to Section 7923.115, 11130.5, or 54960.5 of the Government Code.
(d)This section shall not apply to any enforcement action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Attorney General, Insurance Commissioner, district attorney, or city attorney, acting as a public prosecutor.
(e)As used in this section, act in furtherance of a persons right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue includes: (1) any written or oral statement or writing made before a legislative, executive, or judicial proceeding, or any other official proceeding authorized by law, (2) any written or oral statement or writing made in connection with an issue under consideration or review by a legislative, executive, or judicial body, or any other official proceeding authorized by law, (3) any written or oral statement or writing made in a place open to the public or a public forum in connection with an issue of public interest, or (4) any other conduct in furtherance of the exercise of the constitutional right of petition or the constitutional right of free speech in connection with a public issue or an issue of public interest.
(f)The special motion may be filed within 60 days of the service of the complaint or, in the courts discretion, at any later time upon terms it deems proper. The motion shall be scheduled by the clerk of the court for a hearing not more than 30 days after the service of the motion unless the docket conditions of the court require a later hearing.
(g)All discovery proceedings in the action shall be stayed upon the filing of a notice of motion made pursuant to this section. The stay of discovery shall remain in effect until notice of entry of the order ruling on the motion. The court, on noticed motion and for good cause shown, may order that specified discovery be conducted notwithstanding this subdivision.
(h)For purposes of this section, complaint includes cross-complaint and petition, plaintiff includes cross-complainant and petitioner, and defendant includes cross-defendant and respondent.
(i)An order granting or denying a special motion to strike shall be appealable under Section 904.1.
(j)(1)Any party who files a special motion to strike pursuant to this section, and any party who files an opposition to a special motion to strike, shall, promptly upon so filing, transmit to the Judicial Council, by email or facsimile, a copy of the endorsed, filed caption page of the motion or opposition, a copy of any related notice of appeal or petition for a writ, and a conformed copy of any order issued pursuant to this section, including any order granting or denying a special motion to strike, discovery, or fees.
(2)The Judicial Council shall maintain a public record of information transmitted pursuant to this subdivision for at least three years, and may store the information on microfilm or other appropriate electronic media.
SEC. 2.Section 998 of the Code of Civil Procedure is amended to read:998.(a)The costs allowed under Sections 1031 and 1032 shall be withheld or augmented as provided in this section.
(b)Not less than 10 days prior to commencement of trial or arbitration (as provided in Section 1281 or 1295) of a dispute to be resolved by arbitration, any party may serve an offer in writing upon any other party to the action to allow judgment to be taken or an award to be entered in accordance with the terms and conditions stated at that time. The written offer shall include a statement of the offer, containing the terms and conditions of the judgment or award, and a provision that allows the accepting party to indicate acceptance of the offer by signing a statement that the offer is accepted. Any acceptance of the offer, whether made on the document containing the offer or on a separate document of acceptance, shall be in writing and shall be signed by counsel for the accepting party or, if not represented by counsel, by the accepting party.
(1)If the offer is accepted, the offer with proof of acceptance shall be filed and the clerk or the judge shall enter judgment accordingly. In the case of an arbitration, the offer with proof of acceptance shall be filed with the arbitrator or arbitrators who shall promptly render an award accordingly.
(2)If the offer is not accepted prior to trial or arbitration or within 30 days after it is made, whichever occurs first, it shall be deemed withdrawn, and cannot be given in evidence upon the trial or arbitration.
(3)For purposes of this subdivision, a trial or arbitration shall be deemed to be actually commenced at the beginning of the opening statement of the plaintiff or counsel, or, if there is no opening statement, at the time of the administering of the oath or affirmation to the first witness, or the introduction of any evidence.
(c)(1)If an offer made by a defendant is not accepted and the plaintiff fails to obtain a more favorable judgment or award, the plaintiff shall not recover their postoffer costs and shall pay the defendants costs from the time of the offer. In addition, in any action or proceeding other than an eminent domain action, the court or arbitrator, in its discretion, may require the plaintiff to pay a reasonable sum to cover postoffer costs of the services of expert witnesses, who are not regular employees of any party, actually incurred and reasonably necessary in either, or both, preparation for trial or arbitration, or during trial or arbitration, of the case by the defendant.
(2)(A)In determining whether the plaintiff obtains a more favorable judgment, the court or arbitrator shall exclude the postoffer costs.
(B)It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting subparagraph (A) to supersede the holding in Encinitas Plaza Real v. Knight, 209 Cal.App.3d 996, that attorneys fees awarded to the prevailing party were not costs for purposes of this section but were part of the judgment.
(d)If an offer made by a plaintiff is not accepted and the defendant fails to obtain a more favorable judgment or award in any action or proceeding other than an eminent domain action, the court or arbitrator, in its discretion, may require the defendant to pay a reasonable sum to cover postoffer costs of the services of expert witnesses, who are not regular employees of any party, actually incurred and reasonably necessary in either, or both, preparation for trial or arbitration, or during trial or arbitration, of the case by the plaintiff, in addition to plaintiffs costs.
(e)If an offer made by a defendant is not accepted and the plaintiff fails to obtain a more favorable judgment or award, the costs under this section, from the time of the offer, shall be deducted from any damages awarded in favor of the plaintiff. If the costs awarded under this section exceed the amount of the damages awarded to the plaintiff the net amount shall be awarded to the defendant and judgment or award shall be entered accordingly.
(f)Police officers shall be deemed to be expert witnesses for the purposes of this section. For purposes of this section, plaintiff includes a cross-complainant and defendant includes a cross-defendant. Any judgment or award entered pursuant to this section shall be deemed to be a compromise settlement.
(g)This chapter does not apply to either of the following:
(1)An offer that is made by a plaintiff in an eminent domain action.
(2)Any enforcement action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Attorney General, the Insurance Commissioner, a district attorney, or a city attorney, acting as a public prosecutor.
(h)The costs for services of expert witnesses for trial under subdivisions (c) and (d) shall not exceed those specified in Section 68092.5 of the Government Code.
(i)This section shall not apply to labor arbitrations filed pursuant to memoranda of understanding under the Ralph C. Dills Act (Chapter 10.3 (commencing with Section 3512) of Division 4 of Title 1 of the Government Code).
SEC. 3.Section 1749.81 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:1749.81.(a)A life agent licensed on or after January 1, 2024, who sells individual life insurance policies other than term life with no cash value shall satisfactorily complete four hours of training before soliciting individual consumers to sell those life insurance policies.
(b)A life agent who sells individual variable life insurance policies shall satisfactorily complete two hours of training before each license renewal. Completion of the four-hour annuity training required by Section 1749.8 does not satisfy the training required by this section. This training is in addition to, and is not a part of, the annuity training required by subdivision (b) of Section 1749.8. For resident licensees, this requirement shall count toward the licensees continuing education requirement, but may still result in completing more than the minimum number of continuing education hours set forth in this section.
(c)The training required by this section shall be approved by the commissioner and shall consist of topics related to the types of life insurance policies described in subdivisions (a) and (b) and California law, regulations, and requirements related to those life insurance policies, prohibited sales practices, and unfair trade practices. Subject matter determined by the commissioner to be primarily intended to promote the sale or marketing of life insurance policies shall not qualify for credit toward the training requirement. Any course or seminar that is disapproved under the provisions of this section shall be presumed invalid for credit toward the training requirement of this section unless it is approved in writing by the commissioner.
(d)This section shall become operative January 1, 2025, and applies to licenses that are issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2025.
SEC. 4.Section 1871.7 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:1871.7.(a)It is unlawful to knowingly employ runners, cappers, steerers, or other persons to procure clients or patients to perform or obtain services or benefits pursuant to Division 4 (commencing with Section 3200) of the Labor Code or to procure clients or patients to perform or obtain services or benefits under a contract of insurance or that will be the basis for a claim against an insured individual or their insurer.
(b)Every person who violates any provision of this section or Section 549, 550, or 551 of the Penal Code shall be subject, in addition to any other penalties that may be prescribed by law, to a civil penalty of not less than five thousand dollars ($5,000) nor more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000), plus an assessment of not more than three times the amount of each claim for compensation, as defined in Section 3207 of the Labor Code or pursuant to a contract of insurance. The court shall have the power to grant other equitable relief, including temporary injunctive relief, as is necessary to prevent the transfer, concealment, or dissipation of illegal proceeds, or to protect the public. The penalty prescribed in this paragraph shall be assessed for each fraudulent claim presented to an insurance company by a defendant and not for each violation.
(c)The penalties set forth in subdivision (b) are intended to be remedial rather than punitive, and shall not preclude, nor be precluded by, a criminal prosecution for the same conduct. If the court finds, after considering the goals of disgorging unlawful profit, restitution, compensating the state for the costs of investigation and prosecution, and alleviating the social costs of increased insurance rates due to fraud, that such a penalty would be punitive and would preclude, or be precluded by, a criminal prosecution, the court shall reduce that penalty appropriately.
(d)The district attorney or commissioner may bring a civil action under this section. Before the commissioner may bring that action, the commissioner shall be required to present the evidence obtained to the appropriate local district attorney for possible criminal or civil filing. If the district attorney elects not to pursue the matter, then the commissioner may proceed with the action.
(e)(1)Any interested persons, including an insurer, may bring a civil action for a violation of this section for the person and for the State of California. The action shall be brought in the name of the state. The action may be dismissed only if the court and the district attorney or the commissioner, whichever is participating, give written consent to the dismissal.
(2)A copy of the complaint and written disclosure of substantially all material evidence and information the person possesses shall be served on the district attorney and commissioner. The complaint shall be filed in camera, shall remain under seal for at least 60 days from the date of service on the district attorney and commissioner, and shall not be served on the defendant until the court so orders. The local district attorney or commissioner may elect to intervene and proceed with the action within 60 days after the district attorney or commissioner receives both the complaint and the material evidence and information. If more than one governmental entity elects to intervene, the district attorney shall have precedence.
(3)The district attorney or commissioner may, for good cause shown, move the court for extensions of the time during which the complaint remains under seal under paragraph (2). The motions may be supported by affidavits or other submissions in camera. The defendant shall not be required to respond to any complaint filed under this section until 20 days after the complaint is unsealed and served upon the defendant.
(4)Before the expiration of the 60-day period or any extensions obtained under paragraph (3), the district attorney or commissioner shall either:
(A)Proceed with the action, in which case the action shall be conducted by the district attorney or commissioner.
(B)Notify the court that it declines to take over the action, in which case the person bringing the action shall have the right to conduct the action.
(5)When a person or governmental agency brings an action under this section, no person other than the district attorney or commissioner may intervene or bring a related action based on the facts underlying the pending action unless that action is authorized by another statute or common law.
(f)(1)If the district attorney or commissioner proceeds with the action, the district attorney or commissioner shall have the primary responsibility for prosecuting the action, and shall not be bound by an act of the person bringing the action. That person shall have the right to continue as a party to the action, subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (2).
(2)(A)The district attorney or commissioner may dismiss the action notwithstanding the objections of the person initiating the action if the person has been notified by the district attorney or commissioner of the filing of the motion, and the court has provided the person with an opportunity for a hearing on the motion.
(B)The district attorney or commissioner may settle the action with the defendant notwithstanding the objections of the person initiating the action if the court determines, after a hearing, that the proposed settlement is fair, adequate, and reasonable under all the circumstances. Upon a showing of good cause, the hearing may be held in camera.
(C)Upon a showing by the district attorney or commissioner that unrestricted participation during the course of the litigation by the person initiating the action would interfere with or unduly delay the district attorneys or commissioners prosecution of the case, or would be repetitious, irrelevant, or for purposes of harassment, the court may, in its discretion, impose limitations on the persons participation, including, but not limited to, the following:
(i)Limiting the number of witnesses the person may call.
(ii)Limiting the length of the testimony of those witnesses.
(iii)Limiting the persons cross-examination of witnesses.
(iv)Otherwise limiting the participation by the person in the litigation.
(D)Upon a showing by the defendant that unrestricted participation during the course of the litigation by the person initiating the action would be for purposes of harassment or would cause the defendant undue burden or unnecessary expense, the court may limit the participation by the person in the litigation.
(3)If the district attorney or commissioner elects not to proceed with the action, the person who initiated the action shall have the right to conduct the action. If the district attorney or commissioner so requests, the district attorney or commissioner shall be served with copies of all pleadings filed in the action and shall be supplied with copies of all deposition transcripts, at the district attorneys or commissioners expense. When a person proceeds with the action, the court, without limiting the status and rights of the person initiating the action, may nevertheless permit the district attorney or commissioner to intervene at a later date upon a showing of good cause.
(4)If at any time both a civil action for penalties and equitable relief pursuant to this section and a criminal action are pending against a defendant for substantially the same conduct, whether brought by the government or a private party, the civil action shall be stayed until the criminal action has been concluded at the trial court level. The stay shall not preclude the court from granting or enforcing temporary equitable relief during the pendency of the actions. Whether or not the district attorney or commissioner proceeds with the action, upon a showing by the district attorney or commissioner that certain actions of discovery by the person initiating the action would interfere with a law enforcement or governmental agency investigation or prosecution of a criminal or civil matter arising out of the same facts, the court may stay discovery for a period of not more than 180 days. A hearing on a request for the stay shall be conducted in camera. The court may extend the 180-day period upon a further showing in camera that the agency has pursued the criminal or civil investigation or proceedings with reasonable diligence and any proposed discovery in the civil action will interfere with the ongoing criminal or civil investigation or proceedings.
(5)Notwithstanding subdivision (e), the district attorney or commissioner may elect to pursue its claim through any alternate remedy available to the district attorney or commissioner.
(g)(1)(A)(i)If the district attorney proceeds with an action brought by a person under subdivision (e), that person shall, subject to subparagraph (B), receive at least 30 percent but not more than 40 percent of the proceeds of the action or settlement of the claim, depending upon the extent to which the person substantially contributed to the prosecution of the action.
(ii)If the commissioner has brought an action or has proceeded with an action brought by another person under this section on or after January 1, 2006, the commissioner shall be entitled to attorneys fees and costs in addition to any judgment, regardless of the date that judgment is entered. The court shall determine and award the commissioner the amount of reasonable attorneys fees, including, but not limited to, reasonable fees for time expended by attorneys employed by the department and for costs incurred. Any attorneys fees or costs awarded to the commissioner and collected shall be deposited in the Insurance Fund. In cases in which the commissioner has intervened, the commissioner and the person bringing the claim may stipulate to an allocation. The court may allocate the funds pursuant to the stipulation if, after the courts ruling on objection by the district attorney, if any, the court finds it is in the interests of justice to follow the stipulation.
(iii)If the commissioner has proceeded with an action, if there is no stipulation regarding allocation, and if a judgment has been obtained or a settlement has been reached with the defendants, the court shall determine the allocation, upon motion of the commissioner or the person bringing the action, according to the following priority:
(I)The person bringing the action, regardless of whether that person paid money to the defendants as part of the acts alleged in the complaint, shall first receive the amount the court determines is reasonable for attorneys fees, costs, and expenses that the court determines to have been necessarily incurred.
(II)The commissioner shall receive the amount the court determines for reasonable attorneys fees and costs.
(III)If the person bringing the suit has paid moneys to the defendants as part of the acts alleged in the complaint, that person shall receive the amount paid to the defendants.
(IV)At least 30 percent, but not more than 40 percent, of the remaining assets or moneys, shall be allocated to the person bringing the action, depending upon the extent to which the person substantially contributed to the prosecution of the action.
(iv)Those portions of a judgment or settlement not distributed pursuant to this subdivision shall be paid to the General Fund of the state and, upon appropriation by the Legislature, shall be apportioned between the Department of Justice and the Department of Insurance for enhanced fraud investigation and prevention efforts.
(B)Where the action is one that the court finds to be based primarily on disclosures of specific information, other than information provided by the person bringing the action, relating to allegations or transactions in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing, in a legislative or administrative report, hearing, audit, or investigation, or from the news media, the court may award those sums that it considers appropriate, but in no case more than 10 percent of the proceeds, taking into account the significance of the information and the role of the person bringing the action in advancing the case to litigation.
(C)Any payment to a person under subparagraph (A) or under subparagraph (B) shall be made from the proceeds. The person shall also receive an amount for reasonable expenses that the court finds to have been necessarily incurred, plus reasonable attorneys fees and costs. All of those expenses, fees, and costs shall be awarded against the defendant.
(2)(A)If the district attorney or commissioner does not proceed with an action under this section, the person bringing the action or settling the claim shall receive an amount that the court decides is reasonable for collecting the civil penalty and damages. Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the amount shall not be less than 40 percent and not more than 50 percent of the proceeds of the action or settlement and shall be paid out of the proceeds. That person shall also receive an amount for reasonable expenses that the court finds to have been necessarily incurred, plus reasonable attorneys fees and costs. All of those attorneys fees and costs shall be imposed against the defendant. The parties shall serve the commissioner and the local district attorney with complete copies of any and all settlement agreements, and terms and conditions, for actions brought under this article at least 10 days prior to filing any motion for allocation with the court under this paragraph. The court may allocate the funds pursuant to the settlement agreement if, after the courts ruling on objection by the commissioner or the local district attorney, if any, the court finds it is in the interests of justice to follow the settlement agreement.
(B)If the person bringing the action, as a result of a violation of this section has paid money to the defendant or to an attorney acting on behalf of the defendant in the underlying claim, then the person shall be entitled to up to double the amount paid to the defendant or the attorney if that amount is greater than 50 percent of the proceeds. That person shall also receive an amount for reasonable expenses that the court finds to have been necessarily incurred, plus reasonable attorneys fees and costs. All of those expenses, fees, and costs shall be awarded against the defendant.
(3)If a local district attorney has proceeded with an action under this section, one-half of the penalties not awarded to a private party, as well as any costs awarded shall go to the treasurer of the appropriate county. Those funds shall be used to investigate and prosecute fraud, augmenting existing budgets rather than replacing them. All remaining funds shall go to the state and be deposited in the General Fund and, when appropriated by the Legislature, shall be apportioned between the Department of Justice and the Department of Insurance for enhanced fraud investigation and prevention efforts.
(4)Whether or not the district attorney or commissioner proceeds with the action, if the court finds that the action was brought by a person who planned and initiated the violation of this section, that person shall be dismissed from the civil action and shall not receive any share of the proceeds of the action. The dismissal shall not prejudice the right of the district attorney or commissioner to continue the action on behalf of the state.
(5)If the district attorney or commissioner does not proceed with the action, and the person bringing the action conducts the action, the court may award to the defendant its reasonable attorneys fees and expenses if the defendant prevails in the action and the court finds that the claim of the person bringing the action was clearly frivolous, clearly vexatious, or brought primarily for purposes of harassment.
(h)(1)In no event may a person bring an action under subdivision (e) that is based upon allegations or transactions that are the subject of a civil suit or an administrative civil money penalty proceeding in which the Attorney General, district attorney, or commissioner is already a party.
(2)(A)No court shall have jurisdiction over an action under this section based upon the public disclosure of allegations or transactions in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing in a legislative or administrative report, hearing, audit, or investigation, or from the news media, unless the action is brought by the Attorney General or the person bringing the action is an original source of the information.
(B)For purposes of this paragraph, original source means an individual who has direct and independent knowledge of the information on which the allegations are based and has voluntarily provided the information to the district attorney or commissioner before filing an action under this section that is based on the information.
(i)Except as provided in subdivision (j), the district attorney or commissioner is not liable for expenses that a person incurs in bringing an action under this section.
(j)In civil actions brought under this section in which the commissioner or a district attorney is a party, the court shall retain discretion to impose sanctions otherwise allowed by law, including the ability to order a party to pay expenses as provided in Sections 128.5 and 1028.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
(k)Any employee who is discharged, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed, or in any other manner discriminated against in the terms and conditions of employment by their employer because of lawful acts done by the employee on behalf of the employee or others in furtherance of an action under this section, including investigation for, initiation of, testimony for, or assistance in, an action filed or to be filed under this section, shall be entitled to all relief necessary to make the employee whole. That relief shall include reinstatement with the same seniority status the employee would have had but for the discrimination, two times the amount of backpay, interest on the backpay, and compensation for any special damages sustained as a result of the discrimination, including litigation costs and reasonable attorneys fees. An employee may bring an action in the appropriate superior court for the relief provided in this subdivision. The remedies under this section are in addition to any other remedies provided by existing law.
(l)(1)An action pursuant to this section may not be filed more than three years after the discovery of the facts constituting the grounds for commencing the action.
(2)Notwithstanding paragraph (1) no action may be filed pursuant to this section more than eight years after the commission of the act constituting a violation of this section or a violation of Section 549, 550, or 551 of the Penal Code.
SEC. 5.Section 10123.857 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10123.857.(a)A health insurer that issues, sells, renews, or offers a policy covering dental services, including a specialized health insurance policy covering dental services that offers a service via telehealth to an insured through a third-party corporate telehealth provider shall report to the department, in a manner specified by the department, all of the following for each product type:
(1)The total number of services delivered via telehealth by a third-party corporate telehealth provider.
(2)For each third-party corporate telehealth provider with which it contracts, the percentage of the third-party telehealth providers contracted providers available to the insurers insured that are also network providers.
(3)For each third-party corporate telehealth provider with which it contracts, the types of telehealth services utilized by insureds, including information on the gender and age of the insured, and any other information as determined by the department.
(b)A health insurer that issues, sells, renews, or offers a policy covering dental services, including a specialized health care policy covering dental services that offers a service via telehealth to an insured through a third-party corporate telehealth provider, shall disclose to the insured the impact of third-party telehealth visits on the insureds benefit limitations, including frequency limitations and the insureds annual maximum.
(c)Section 10123.856 shall not apply to specialized health insurance policies covering dental services.
(d)For the purposes of this section, third-party corporate telehealth provider means a corporation that provides dental services exclusively through a telehealth technology platform and has no physical location at which a patient can receive services, and is directly contracted with a health insurer that issues, sells, renews, or offers a policy, including a specialized health insurance policy, that covers dental services.
SEC. 6.Section 11401 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:11401.(a)An association shall not operate or do business in this state without a certificate of authority. The commissioner shall issue a certificate of authority to any association unless the commissioner determines, after examination, that it does not comply with the provisions of this chapter. The filing fee for the application for the certificate of authority shall be one thousand four hundred ten dollars ($1,410).
(b)An association shall renew its certificate of authority within 30 days after a change in name or address or before a merger.
(c)(1)The commissioner may revoke the certificate of authority for an association that failed to renew its certificate of authority in compliance with subdivision (b), after giving reasonable written notice mailed to the last address of the association registered with the department.
(2)The commissioner may revoke the certificate of authority for an association that has a dissolved, suspended, or otherwise inactive status according to the records of the Secretary of State, after giving reasonable written notice mailed to the last address of the association registered with the department.
(3)To obtain a reissue of a certificate of authority revoked pursuant to this subdivision, an association shall apply to the commissioner pursuant to subdivision (a).
SEC. 7.Section 12418.4 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:12418.4.(a)Sections 1667, 1668, 1669, 1670, 1729, 1729.2, 1738, 1738.5, 1742, 1743, and Article 6 (commencing with Section 12404), shall apply to all applicants or holders of a certificate of registration issued pursuant to this article.
(b)The department may revoke, suspend, restrict, or decline to issue a certificate of registration if it determines that the title marketing representative or applicant has violated provisions of Article 6 (commencing with Section 12404) pursuant to the due process and hearing requirements set forth in subdivision (c).
(c)Except as provided in Section 1669, a certificate of registration shall not be denied, restricted, suspended, or revoked without a hearing conducted in accordance with Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 11500) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(d)In addition to, or in lieu of, any other penalty that may be imposed under this article against a title marketing representative, the commissioner may bring an administrative action against a title marketing representative for any violation of the provisions of Article 6 (commencing with Section 12404). If a title marketing representative charged with a violation of Article 6 (commencing with Section 12404) is determined by the commissioner to have committed the violation, the commissioner may require the surrender of, temporarily suspend or revoke either permanently or temporarily the title marketing representatives certificate of registration, and, in addition, may impose a monetary penalty. Any payment of a monetary penalty pursuant to a settlement or final adjudication shall be made from the title marketing representatives personal funds and not by their employer either directly or through the title marketing representative. This article shall not preclude an action against a company that had actual knowledge of the violation by the title marketing representative. A title marketing representative who is issued a certificate of registration under this article may not engage in any activity that is otherwise prohibited through a separate entity controlled by the title marketing representative or by the company or entity that employs the title marketing representative.
(e)A title marketing representative who has their certificate of registration revoked by the department shall not be permitted to reapply for another certificate of registration with the department for five years from the date of revocation.
SEC. 8.Section 12931 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:12931.(a)Service of legal process, notices, or other papers described in or referred to by Section 1452, 1605, 1610, 1612, 11104, or 11105 may be made upon the commissioner in the instances enumerated in this section and under the circumstances prescribed in this section by delivering to the commissioner, the commissioners deputy, or the commissioners designated agent for service of process two copies thereof for each person or party defendant so served accompanied by payment of a substituted service fee as determined pursuant to Section 12978 for each person or party, and by complying with the other provisions of this section.
(b)The situations under which such service may be so made and the circumstances under which these provisions apply are:
(1)Where for any reason the person desiring to have service so made elects to serve the commissioner instead of the attorney in fact, as stipulated pursuant to Section 1323, of a reciprocal or interinsurance exchange, domestic, foreign, admitted, or nonadmitted.
(2)Where service is to be made on an admitted foreign or alien insurer, when service cannot be made on the principal statutory agent of such insurer duly appointed pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 1600) of Chapter 4 of Part 2 of Division 1 for reasons specified in Section 1604 or otherwise recognized by law.
(3)In actions against nonadmitted insurers, including nonadmitted fraternal benefit societies and reciprocals, under the circumstances described in Article 4 (commencing with Section 1610) of Chapter 4 of Part 2 of Division 1. This provision shall not apply to actions brought under insurance policies or certificates issued by nonadmitted insurers placed by surplus line brokers or special lines surplus line brokers where such insurance contract names a resident of this state as agent for service of process.
(4)In actions involving admitted and formerly admitted fraternal benefit societies as described in Section 11104.
(c)Upon receipt of two copies of the process, notice, or papers to be served and the fee above prescribed, the commissioner shall promptly mail one of the copies by certified mail (or by registered mail if it is addressed to an area outside of the United States where certified mail service is not available) to the defendant or person to be served at the last principal place of business of the defendant or person to be served, known to the commissioner by the commissioners official records in the case of a licensee; otherwise, in the case of a nonadmitted insurer, to its last principal place of business known to the commissioner from national directories or reference books or other reliable information available in the commissioners office. The commissioner shall keep a record of all services made upon the commissioner pursuant to this section. The other copy of the process, notice, or papers shall be retained among the commissioners official public records for a period not to exceed two years, absent special circumstances which in the commissioners judgment compel longer retention.
(d)Service made in the manner provided for in this section is valid and sufficient and gives jurisdiction over the person of a nonadmitted or unauthorized defendant, provided notice of such service and a copy of the process, notice, or papers being served are sent within 10 days thereafter by certified mail (or by registered mail if it is addressed to an area outside of the United States where certified mail service is not available) by plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney to the defendant at its last known principal place of business, and the receipt or the receipt of defendants agent for such copy, showing the name of the sender and the name and address of the addressee-defendant thereon, and the affidavit of plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney showing compliance with this section, are filed with the clerk of the court in which such action is pending on or before the date the defendant is required to appear, or within further time as the court may allow.
In case of service made pursuant to this section upon a licensee of the commissioner required by law to keep the licensees current business address or that of its agent for service of process on file with the commissioner, the service shall be valid if the commissioner mailed, postage prepaid, a copy of the process, notice, or papers to the defendant or licensee intended to be served to the licensees current address as shown by the commissioners records, or, in the case of an insurer, to its manager, president, or secretary, and an affidavit of compliance by plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney at law is made and filed at the place and within the time mentioned in this subdivision.
(e)A plaintiff or complainant shall not be entitled to a judgment by default in any action, suit, or proceeding in which service of process is effected in the manner provided in this section until the expiration of 30 days from the date on which the affidavit of compliance is filed.
(f)This section does not limit or abridge the right to serve any process, notice, papers, or demand upon any insurer in any other manner now or hereafter permitted by law.
(a)The Legislature finds and declares that there has been a disturbing increase in lawsuits brought primarily to chill the valid exercise of the constitutional rights of freedom of speech and petition for the redress of grievances. The Legislature finds and declares that it is in the public interest to encourage continued participation in matters of public significance, and that this participation should not be chilled through abuse of the judicial process. To this end, this section shall be construed broadly.
(b)(1)A cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in furtherance of the persons right of petition or free speech under the United States Constitution or the California Constitution in connection with a public issue shall be subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established that there is a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim.
(2)In making its determination, the court shall consider the pleadings, and supporting and opposing affidavits stating the facts upon which the liability or defense is based.
(3)If the court determines that the plaintiff has established a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim, neither that determination nor the fact of that determination shall be admissible in evidence at any later stage of the case, or in any subsequent action, and no burden of proof or degree of proof otherwise applicable shall be affected by that determination in any later stage of the case or in any subsequent proceeding.
(c)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), in any action subject to subdivision (b), a prevailing defendant on a special motion to strike shall be entitled to recover that defendants attorneys fees and costs. If the court finds that a special motion to strike is frivolous or is solely intended to cause unnecessary delay, the court shall award costs and reasonable attorneys fees to a plaintiff prevailing on the motion, pursuant to Section 128.5.
(2)A defendant who prevails on a special motion to strike in an action subject to paragraph (1) shall not be entitled to attorneys fees and costs if that cause of action is brought pursuant to Section 11130, 11130.3, 54960, or 54960.1 of the Government Code, or pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 7923.100) of Part 4 of Division 10 of Title 1 of the Government Code. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to prevent a prevailing defendant from recovering attorneys fees and costs pursuant to Section 7923.115, 11130.5, or 54960.5 of the Government Code.
(d)This section shall not apply to any enforcement action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Attorney General, Insurance Commissioner, district attorney, or city attorney, acting as a public prosecutor.
(e)As used in this section, act in furtherance of a persons right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue includes: (1) any written or oral statement or writing made before a legislative, executive, or judicial proceeding, or any other official proceeding authorized by law, (2) any written or oral statement or writing made in connection with an issue under consideration or review by a legislative, executive, or judicial body, or any other official proceeding authorized by law, (3) any written or oral statement or writing made in a place open to the public or a public forum in connection with an issue of public interest, or (4) any other conduct in furtherance of the exercise of the constitutional right of petition or the constitutional right of free speech in connection with a public issue or an issue of public interest.
(f)The special motion may be filed within 60 days of the service of the complaint or, in the courts discretion, at any later time upon terms it deems proper. The motion shall be scheduled by the clerk of the court for a hearing not more than 30 days after the service of the motion unless the docket conditions of the court require a later hearing.
(g)All discovery proceedings in the action shall be stayed upon the filing of a notice of motion made pursuant to this section. The stay of discovery shall remain in effect until notice of entry of the order ruling on the motion. The court, on noticed motion and for good cause shown, may order that specified discovery be conducted notwithstanding this subdivision.
(h)For purposes of this section, complaint includes cross-complaint and petition, plaintiff includes cross-complainant and petitioner, and defendant includes cross-defendant and respondent.
(i)An order granting or denying a special motion to strike shall be appealable under Section 904.1.
(j)(1)Any party who files a special motion to strike pursuant to this section, and any party who files an opposition to a special motion to strike, shall, promptly upon so filing, transmit to the Judicial Council, by email or facsimile, a copy of the endorsed, filed caption page of the motion or opposition, a copy of any related notice of appeal or petition for a writ, and a conformed copy of any order issued pursuant to this section, including any order granting or denying a special motion to strike, discovery, or fees.
(2)The Judicial Council shall maintain a public record of information transmitted pursuant to this subdivision for at least three years, and may store the information on microfilm or other appropriate electronic media.
SEC. 2.Section 998 of the Code of Civil Procedure is amended to read:998.(a)The costs allowed under Sections 1031 and 1032 shall be withheld or augmented as provided in this section.
(b)Not less than 10 days prior to commencement of trial or arbitration (as provided in Section 1281 or 1295) of a dispute to be resolved by arbitration, any party may serve an offer in writing upon any other party to the action to allow judgment to be taken or an award to be entered in accordance with the terms and conditions stated at that time. The written offer shall include a statement of the offer, containing the terms and conditions of the judgment or award, and a provision that allows the accepting party to indicate acceptance of the offer by signing a statement that the offer is accepted. Any acceptance of the offer, whether made on the document containing the offer or on a separate document of acceptance, shall be in writing and shall be signed by counsel for the accepting party or, if not represented by counsel, by the accepting party.
(1)If the offer is accepted, the offer with proof of acceptance shall be filed and the clerk or the judge shall enter judgment accordingly. In the case of an arbitration, the offer with proof of acceptance shall be filed with the arbitrator or arbitrators who shall promptly render an award accordingly.
(2)If the offer is not accepted prior to trial or arbitration or within 30 days after it is made, whichever occurs first, it shall be deemed withdrawn, and cannot be given in evidence upon the trial or arbitration.
(3)For purposes of this subdivision, a trial or arbitration shall be deemed to be actually commenced at the beginning of the opening statement of the plaintiff or counsel, or, if there is no opening statement, at the time of the administering of the oath or affirmation to the first witness, or the introduction of any evidence.
(c)(1)If an offer made by a defendant is not accepted and the plaintiff fails to obtain a more favorable judgment or award, the plaintiff shall not recover their postoffer costs and shall pay the defendants costs from the time of the offer. In addition, in any action or proceeding other than an eminent domain action, the court or arbitrator, in its discretion, may require the plaintiff to pay a reasonable sum to cover postoffer costs of the services of expert witnesses, who are not regular employees of any party, actually incurred and reasonably necessary in either, or both, preparation for trial or arbitration, or during trial or arbitration, of the case by the defendant.
(2)(A)In determining whether the plaintiff obtains a more favorable judgment, the court or arbitrator shall exclude the postoffer costs.
(B)It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting subparagraph (A) to supersede the holding in Encinitas Plaza Real v. Knight, 209 Cal.App.3d 996, that attorneys fees awarded to the prevailing party were not costs for purposes of this section but were part of the judgment.
(d)If an offer made by a plaintiff is not accepted and the defendant fails to obtain a more favorable judgment or award in any action or proceeding other than an eminent domain action, the court or arbitrator, in its discretion, may require the defendant to pay a reasonable sum to cover postoffer costs of the services of expert witnesses, who are not regular employees of any party, actually incurred and reasonably necessary in either, or both, preparation for trial or arbitration, or during trial or arbitration, of the case by the plaintiff, in addition to plaintiffs costs.
(e)If an offer made by a defendant is not accepted and the plaintiff fails to obtain a more favorable judgment or award, the costs under this section, from the time of the offer, shall be deducted from any damages awarded in favor of the plaintiff. If the costs awarded under this section exceed the amount of the damages awarded to the plaintiff the net amount shall be awarded to the defendant and judgment or award shall be entered accordingly.
(f)Police officers shall be deemed to be expert witnesses for the purposes of this section. For purposes of this section, plaintiff includes a cross-complainant and defendant includes a cross-defendant. Any judgment or award entered pursuant to this section shall be deemed to be a compromise settlement.
(g)This chapter does not apply to either of the following:
(1)An offer that is made by a plaintiff in an eminent domain action.
(2)Any enforcement action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Attorney General, the Insurance Commissioner, a district attorney, or a city attorney, acting as a public prosecutor.
(h)The costs for services of expert witnesses for trial under subdivisions (c) and (d) shall not exceed those specified in Section 68092.5 of the Government Code.
(i)This section shall not apply to labor arbitrations filed pursuant to memoranda of understanding under the Ralph C. Dills Act (Chapter 10.3 (commencing with Section 3512) of Division 4 of Title 1 of the Government Code).
SEC. 3.Section 1749.81 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:1749.81.(a)A life agent licensed on or after January 1, 2024, who sells individual life insurance policies other than term life with no cash value shall satisfactorily complete four hours of training before soliciting individual consumers to sell those life insurance policies.
(b)A life agent who sells individual variable life insurance policies shall satisfactorily complete two hours of training before each license renewal. Completion of the four-hour annuity training required by Section 1749.8 does not satisfy the training required by this section. This training is in addition to, and is not a part of, the annuity training required by subdivision (b) of Section 1749.8. For resident licensees, this requirement shall count toward the licensees continuing education requirement, but may still result in completing more than the minimum number of continuing education hours set forth in this section.
(c)The training required by this section shall be approved by the commissioner and shall consist of topics related to the types of life insurance policies described in subdivisions (a) and (b) and California law, regulations, and requirements related to those life insurance policies, prohibited sales practices, and unfair trade practices. Subject matter determined by the commissioner to be primarily intended to promote the sale or marketing of life insurance policies shall not qualify for credit toward the training requirement. Any course or seminar that is disapproved under the provisions of this section shall be presumed invalid for credit toward the training requirement of this section unless it is approved in writing by the commissioner.
(d)This section shall become operative January 1, 2025, and applies to licenses that are issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2025.
SEC. 4.Section 1871.7 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:1871.7.(a)It is unlawful to knowingly employ runners, cappers, steerers, or other persons to procure clients or patients to perform or obtain services or benefits pursuant to Division 4 (commencing with Section 3200) of the Labor Code or to procure clients or patients to perform or obtain services or benefits under a contract of insurance or that will be the basis for a claim against an insured individual or their insurer.
(b)Every person who violates any provision of this section or Section 549, 550, or 551 of the Penal Code shall be subject, in addition to any other penalties that may be prescribed by law, to a civil penalty of not less than five thousand dollars ($5,000) nor more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000), plus an assessment of not more than three times the amount of each claim for compensation, as defined in Section 3207 of the Labor Code or pursuant to a contract of insurance. The court shall have the power to grant other equitable relief, including temporary injunctive relief, as is necessary to prevent the transfer, concealment, or dissipation of illegal proceeds, or to protect the public. The penalty prescribed in this paragraph shall be assessed for each fraudulent claim presented to an insurance company by a defendant and not for each violation.
(c)The penalties set forth in subdivision (b) are intended to be remedial rather than punitive, and shall not preclude, nor be precluded by, a criminal prosecution for the same conduct. If the court finds, after considering the goals of disgorging unlawful profit, restitution, compensating the state for the costs of investigation and prosecution, and alleviating the social costs of increased insurance rates due to fraud, that such a penalty would be punitive and would preclude, or be precluded by, a criminal prosecution, the court shall reduce that penalty appropriately.
(d)The district attorney or commissioner may bring a civil action under this section. Before the commissioner may bring that action, the commissioner shall be required to present the evidence obtained to the appropriate local district attorney for possible criminal or civil filing. If the district attorney elects not to pursue the matter, then the commissioner may proceed with the action.
(e)(1)Any interested persons, including an insurer, may bring a civil action for a violation of this section for the person and for the State of California. The action shall be brought in the name of the state. The action may be dismissed only if the court and the district attorney or the commissioner, whichever is participating, give written consent to the dismissal.
(2)A copy of the complaint and written disclosure of substantially all material evidence and information the person possesses shall be served on the district attorney and commissioner. The complaint shall be filed in camera, shall remain under seal for at least 60 days from the date of service on the district attorney and commissioner, and shall not be served on the defendant until the court so orders. The local district attorney or commissioner may elect to intervene and proceed with the action within 60 days after the district attorney or commissioner receives both the complaint and the material evidence and information. If more than one governmental entity elects to intervene, the district attorney shall have precedence.
(3)The district attorney or commissioner may, for good cause shown, move the court for extensions of the time during which the complaint remains under seal under paragraph (2). The motions may be supported by affidavits or other submissions in camera. The defendant shall not be required to respond to any complaint filed under this section until 20 days after the complaint is unsealed and served upon the defendant.
(4)Before the expiration of the 60-day period or any extensions obtained under paragraph (3), the district attorney or commissioner shall either:
(A)Proceed with the action, in which case the action shall be conducted by the district attorney or commissioner.
(B)Notify the court that it declines to take over the action, in which case the person bringing the action shall have the right to conduct the action.
(5)When a person or governmental agency brings an action under this section, no person other than the district attorney or commissioner may intervene or bring a related action based on the facts underlying the pending action unless that action is authorized by another statute or common law.
(f)(1)If the district attorney or commissioner proceeds with the action, the district attorney or commissioner shall have the primary responsibility for prosecuting the action, and shall not be bound by an act of the person bringing the action. That person shall have the right to continue as a party to the action, subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (2).
(2)(A)The district attorney or commissioner may dismiss the action notwithstanding the objections of the person initiating the action if the person has been notified by the district attorney or commissioner of the filing of the motion, and the court has provided the person with an opportunity for a hearing on the motion.
(B)The district attorney or commissioner may settle the action with the defendant notwithstanding the objections of the person initiating the action if the court determines, after a hearing, that the proposed settlement is fair, adequate, and reasonable under all the circumstances. Upon a showing of good cause, the hearing may be held in camera.
(C)Upon a showing by the district attorney or commissioner that unrestricted participation during the course of the litigation by the person initiating the action would interfere with or unduly delay the district attorneys or commissioners prosecution of the case, or would be repetitious, irrelevant, or for purposes of harassment, the court may, in its discretion, impose limitations on the persons participation, including, but not limited to, the following:
(i)Limiting the number of witnesses the person may call.
(ii)Limiting the length of the testimony of those witnesses.
(iii)Limiting the persons cross-examination of witnesses.
(iv)Otherwise limiting the participation by the person in the litigation.
(D)Upon a showing by the defendant that unrestricted participation during the course of the litigation by the person initiating the action would be for purposes of harassment or would cause the defendant undue burden or unnecessary expense, the court may limit the participation by the person in the litigation.
(3)If the district attorney or commissioner elects not to proceed with the action, the person who initiated the action shall have the right to conduct the action. If the district attorney or commissioner so requests, the district attorney or commissioner shall be served with copies of all pleadings filed in the action and shall be supplied with copies of all deposition transcripts, at the district attorneys or commissioners expense. When a person proceeds with the action, the court, without limiting the status and rights of the person initiating the action, may nevertheless permit the district attorney or commissioner to intervene at a later date upon a showing of good cause.
(4)If at any time both a civil action for penalties and equitable relief pursuant to this section and a criminal action are pending against a defendant for substantially the same conduct, whether brought by the government or a private party, the civil action shall be stayed until the criminal action has been concluded at the trial court level. The stay shall not preclude the court from granting or enforcing temporary equitable relief during the pendency of the actions. Whether or not the district attorney or commissioner proceeds with the action, upon a showing by the district attorney or commissioner that certain actions of discovery by the person initiating the action would interfere with a law enforcement or governmental agency investigation or prosecution of a criminal or civil matter arising out of the same facts, the court may stay discovery for a period of not more than 180 days. A hearing on a request for the stay shall be conducted in camera. The court may extend the 180-day period upon a further showing in camera that the agency has pursued the criminal or civil investigation or proceedings with reasonable diligence and any proposed discovery in the civil action will interfere with the ongoing criminal or civil investigation or proceedings.
(5)Notwithstanding subdivision (e), the district attorney or commissioner may elect to pursue its claim through any alternate remedy available to the district attorney or commissioner.
(g)(1)(A)(i)If the district attorney proceeds with an action brought by a person under subdivision (e), that person shall, subject to subparagraph (B), receive at least 30 percent but not more than 40 percent of the proceeds of the action or settlement of the claim, depending upon the extent to which the person substantially contributed to the prosecution of the action.
(ii)If the commissioner has brought an action or has proceeded with an action brought by another person under this section on or after January 1, 2006, the commissioner shall be entitled to attorneys fees and costs in addition to any judgment, regardless of the date that judgment is entered. The court shall determine and award the commissioner the amount of reasonable attorneys fees, including, but not limited to, reasonable fees for time expended by attorneys employed by the department and for costs incurred. Any attorneys fees or costs awarded to the commissioner and collected shall be deposited in the Insurance Fund. In cases in which the commissioner has intervened, the commissioner and the person bringing the claim may stipulate to an allocation. The court may allocate the funds pursuant to the stipulation if, after the courts ruling on objection by the district attorney, if any, the court finds it is in the interests of justice to follow the stipulation.
(iii)If the commissioner has proceeded with an action, if there is no stipulation regarding allocation, and if a judgment has been obtained or a settlement has been reached with the defendants, the court shall determine the allocation, upon motion of the commissioner or the person bringing the action, according to the following priority:
(I)The person bringing the action, regardless of whether that person paid money to the defendants as part of the acts alleged in the complaint, shall first receive the amount the court determines is reasonable for attorneys fees, costs, and expenses that the court determines to have been necessarily incurred.
(II)The commissioner shall receive the amount the court determines for reasonable attorneys fees and costs.
(III)If the person bringing the suit has paid moneys to the defendants as part of the acts alleged in the complaint, that person shall receive the amount paid to the defendants.
(IV)At least 30 percent, but not more than 40 percent, of the remaining assets or moneys, shall be allocated to the person bringing the action, depending upon the extent to which the person substantially contributed to the prosecution of the action.
(iv)Those portions of a judgment or settlement not distributed pursuant to this subdivision shall be paid to the General Fund of the state and, upon appropriation by the Legislature, shall be apportioned between the Department of Justice and the Department of Insurance for enhanced fraud investigation and prevention efforts.
(B)Where the action is one that the court finds to be based primarily on disclosures of specific information, other than information provided by the person bringing the action, relating to allegations or transactions in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing, in a legislative or administrative report, hearing, audit, or investigation, or from the news media, the court may award those sums that it considers appropriate, but in no case more than 10 percent of the proceeds, taking into account the significance of the information and the role of the person bringing the action in advancing the case to litigation.
(C)Any payment to a person under subparagraph (A) or under subparagraph (B) shall be made from the proceeds. The person shall also receive an amount for reasonable expenses that the court finds to have been necessarily incurred, plus reasonable attorneys fees and costs. All of those expenses, fees, and costs shall be awarded against the defendant.
(2)(A)If the district attorney or commissioner does not proceed with an action under this section, the person bringing the action or settling the claim shall receive an amount that the court decides is reasonable for collecting the civil penalty and damages. Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the amount shall not be less than 40 percent and not more than 50 percent of the proceeds of the action or settlement and shall be paid out of the proceeds. That person shall also receive an amount for reasonable expenses that the court finds to have been necessarily incurred, plus reasonable attorneys fees and costs. All of those attorneys fees and costs shall be imposed against the defendant. The parties shall serve the commissioner and the local district attorney with complete copies of any and all settlement agreements, and terms and conditions, for actions brought under this article at least 10 days prior to filing any motion for allocation with the court under this paragraph. The court may allocate the funds pursuant to the settlement agreement if, after the courts ruling on objection by the commissioner or the local district attorney, if any, the court finds it is in the interests of justice to follow the settlement agreement.
(B)If the person bringing the action, as a result of a violation of this section has paid money to the defendant or to an attorney acting on behalf of the defendant in the underlying claim, then the person shall be entitled to up to double the amount paid to the defendant or the attorney if that amount is greater than 50 percent of the proceeds. That person shall also receive an amount for reasonable expenses that the court finds to have been necessarily incurred, plus reasonable attorneys fees and costs. All of those expenses, fees, and costs shall be awarded against the defendant.
(3)If a local district attorney has proceeded with an action under this section, one-half of the penalties not awarded to a private party, as well as any costs awarded shall go to the treasurer of the appropriate county. Those funds shall be used to investigate and prosecute fraud, augmenting existing budgets rather than replacing them. All remaining funds shall go to the state and be deposited in the General Fund and, when appropriated by the Legislature, shall be apportioned between the Department of Justice and the Department of Insurance for enhanced fraud investigation and prevention efforts.
(4)Whether or not the district attorney or commissioner proceeds with the action, if the court finds that the action was brought by a person who planned and initiated the violation of this section, that person shall be dismissed from the civil action and shall not receive any share of the proceeds of the action. The dismissal shall not prejudice the right of the district attorney or commissioner to continue the action on behalf of the state.
(5)If the district attorney or commissioner does not proceed with the action, and the person bringing the action conducts the action, the court may award to the defendant its reasonable attorneys fees and expenses if the defendant prevails in the action and the court finds that the claim of the person bringing the action was clearly frivolous, clearly vexatious, or brought primarily for purposes of harassment.
(h)(1)In no event may a person bring an action under subdivision (e) that is based upon allegations or transactions that are the subject of a civil suit or an administrative civil money penalty proceeding in which the Attorney General, district attorney, or commissioner is already a party.
(2)(A)No court shall have jurisdiction over an action under this section based upon the public disclosure of allegations or transactions in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing in a legislative or administrative report, hearing, audit, or investigation, or from the news media, unless the action is brought by the Attorney General or the person bringing the action is an original source of the information.
(B)For purposes of this paragraph, original source means an individual who has direct and independent knowledge of the information on which the allegations are based and has voluntarily provided the information to the district attorney or commissioner before filing an action under this section that is based on the information.
(i)Except as provided in subdivision (j), the district attorney or commissioner is not liable for expenses that a person incurs in bringing an action under this section.
(j)In civil actions brought under this section in which the commissioner or a district attorney is a party, the court shall retain discretion to impose sanctions otherwise allowed by law, including the ability to order a party to pay expenses as provided in Sections 128.5 and 1028.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
(k)Any employee who is discharged, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed, or in any other manner discriminated against in the terms and conditions of employment by their employer because of lawful acts done by the employee on behalf of the employee or others in furtherance of an action under this section, including investigation for, initiation of, testimony for, or assistance in, an action filed or to be filed under this section, shall be entitled to all relief necessary to make the employee whole. That relief shall include reinstatement with the same seniority status the employee would have had but for the discrimination, two times the amount of backpay, interest on the backpay, and compensation for any special damages sustained as a result of the discrimination, including litigation costs and reasonable attorneys fees. An employee may bring an action in the appropriate superior court for the relief provided in this subdivision. The remedies under this section are in addition to any other remedies provided by existing law.
(l)(1)An action pursuant to this section may not be filed more than three years after the discovery of the facts constituting the grounds for commencing the action.
(2)Notwithstanding paragraph (1) no action may be filed pursuant to this section more than eight years after the commission of the act constituting a violation of this section or a violation of Section 549, 550, or 551 of the Penal Code.
SEC. 5.Section 10123.857 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10123.857.(a)A health insurer that issues, sells, renews, or offers a policy covering dental services, including a specialized health insurance policy covering dental services that offers a service via telehealth to an insured through a third-party corporate telehealth provider shall report to the department, in a manner specified by the department, all of the following for each product type:
(1)The total number of services delivered via telehealth by a third-party corporate telehealth provider.
(2)For each third-party corporate telehealth provider with which it contracts, the percentage of the third-party telehealth providers contracted providers available to the insurers insured that are also network providers.
(3)For each third-party corporate telehealth provider with which it contracts, the types of telehealth services utilized by insureds, including information on the gender and age of the insured, and any other information as determined by the department.
(b)A health insurer that issues, sells, renews, or offers a policy covering dental services, including a specialized health care policy covering dental services that offers a service via telehealth to an insured through a third-party corporate telehealth provider, shall disclose to the insured the impact of third-party telehealth visits on the insureds benefit limitations, including frequency limitations and the insureds annual maximum.
(c)Section 10123.856 shall not apply to specialized health insurance policies covering dental services.
(d)For the purposes of this section, third-party corporate telehealth provider means a corporation that provides dental services exclusively through a telehealth technology platform and has no physical location at which a patient can receive services, and is directly contracted with a health insurer that issues, sells, renews, or offers a policy, including a specialized health insurance policy, that covers dental services.
SEC. 6.Section 11401 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:11401.(a)An association shall not operate or do business in this state without a certificate of authority. The commissioner shall issue a certificate of authority to any association unless the commissioner determines, after examination, that it does not comply with the provisions of this chapter. The filing fee for the application for the certificate of authority shall be one thousand four hundred ten dollars ($1,410).
(b)An association shall renew its certificate of authority within 30 days after a change in name or address or before a merger.
(c)(1)The commissioner may revoke the certificate of authority for an association that failed to renew its certificate of authority in compliance with subdivision (b), after giving reasonable written notice mailed to the last address of the association registered with the department.
(2)The commissioner may revoke the certificate of authority for an association that has a dissolved, suspended, or otherwise inactive status according to the records of the Secretary of State, after giving reasonable written notice mailed to the last address of the association registered with the department.
(3)To obtain a reissue of a certificate of authority revoked pursuant to this subdivision, an association shall apply to the commissioner pursuant to subdivision (a).
SEC. 7.Section 12418.4 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:12418.4.(a)Sections 1667, 1668, 1669, 1670, 1729, 1729.2, 1738, 1738.5, 1742, 1743, and Article 6 (commencing with Section 12404), shall apply to all applicants or holders of a certificate of registration issued pursuant to this article.
(b)The department may revoke, suspend, restrict, or decline to issue a certificate of registration if it determines that the title marketing representative or applicant has violated provisions of Article 6 (commencing with Section 12404) pursuant to the due process and hearing requirements set forth in subdivision (c).
(c)Except as provided in Section 1669, a certificate of registration shall not be denied, restricted, suspended, or revoked without a hearing conducted in accordance with Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 11500) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(d)In addition to, or in lieu of, any other penalty that may be imposed under this article against a title marketing representative, the commissioner may bring an administrative action against a title marketing representative for any violation of the provisions of Article 6 (commencing with Section 12404). If a title marketing representative charged with a violation of Article 6 (commencing with Section 12404) is determined by the commissioner to have committed the violation, the commissioner may require the surrender of, temporarily suspend or revoke either permanently or temporarily the title marketing representatives certificate of registration, and, in addition, may impose a monetary penalty. Any payment of a monetary penalty pursuant to a settlement or final adjudication shall be made from the title marketing representatives personal funds and not by their employer either directly or through the title marketing representative. This article shall not preclude an action against a company that had actual knowledge of the violation by the title marketing representative. A title marketing representative who is issued a certificate of registration under this article may not engage in any activity that is otherwise prohibited through a separate entity controlled by the title marketing representative or by the company or entity that employs the title marketing representative.
(e)A title marketing representative who has their certificate of registration revoked by the department shall not be permitted to reapply for another certificate of registration with the department for five years from the date of revocation.
SEC. 8.Section 12752 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:12752.(a)A home protection company shall file an annual statement exhibiting its conditions and affairs in accordance with Sections 900, 900.5, 900.8, 900.9, 902, 903, 903.5, 904, 922.1 to 922.8, inclusive, 923, 923.5, and 924. However, the required contents of the annual statement may vary from the requirements thereof, pursuant to regulations adopted by the commissioner in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, so as to adapt the requirements to the home protection business. This subdivision shall not be construed to limit the authority of the commissioner to request financial statements from licensees at any time.(b)The commissioner shall, before licensure and at other times as appears necessary, examine the business and affairs of a home protection company subject to this part. A home protection company so examined shall open its books and records for inspection by the commissioner and shall otherwise facilitate and cooperate in the examination. In making the examination, the commissioner shall have the rights specified in Section 733, and the examinee shall be subject to the obligations of Section 736. The commissioner shall not conduct more than one financial examination of a company in a five-year period, unless the commissioner finds that the financial condition of the company has deteriorated, thereby warranting an interim examination.(c)The commissioner may extend the period between examinations up to two additional years if the commissioner determines that conditions warrant the extension. In making that determination, the commissioner may consider all of the following factors:(1)The companys reserves.(2)The companys net worth.(3)Any other factors the commissioner considers relevant.(d)In addition to the financial examination conducted pursuant to subdivision (b), the commissioner may request a home protection company to furnish the department with a financial audit by an independent certified public accountant.SEC. 9.SEC. 8.Section 12931 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:12931.(a)Service of legal process, notices, or other papers described in or referred to by Section 1452, 1605, 1610, 1612, 11104, or 11105 may be made upon the commissioner in the instances enumerated in this section and under the circumstances prescribed in this section by delivering to the commissioner, the commissioners deputy, or the commissioners designated agent for service of process two copies thereof for each person or party defendant so served accompanied by payment of a substituted service fee as determined pursuant to Section 12978 for each person or party, and by complying with the other provisions of this section.
(b)The situations under which such service may be so made and the circumstances under which these provisions apply are:
(1)Where for any reason the person desiring to have service so made elects to serve the commissioner instead of the attorney in fact, as stipulated pursuant to Section 1323, of a reciprocal or interinsurance exchange, domestic, foreign, admitted, or nonadmitted.
(2)Where service is to be made on an admitted foreign or alien insurer, when service cannot be made on the principal statutory agent of such insurer duly appointed pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 1600) of Chapter 4 of Part 2 of Division 1 for reasons specified in Section 1604 or otherwise recognized by law.
(3)In actions against nonadmitted insurers, including nonadmitted fraternal benefit societies and reciprocals, under the circumstances described in Article 4 (commencing with Section 1610) of Chapter 4 of Part 2 of Division 1. This provision shall not apply to actions brought under insurance policies or certificates issued by nonadmitted insurers placed by surplus line brokers or special lines surplus line brokers where such insurance contract names a resident of this state as agent for service of process.
(4)In actions involving admitted and formerly admitted fraternal benefit societies as described in Section 11104.
(c)Upon receipt of two copies of the process, notice, or papers to be served and the fee above prescribed, the commissioner shall promptly mail one of the copies by certified mail (or by registered mail if it is addressed to an area outside of the United States where certified mail service is not available) to the defendant or person to be served at the last principal place of business of the defendant or person to be served, known to the commissioner by the commissioners official records in the case of a licensee; otherwise, in the case of a nonadmitted insurer, to its last principal place of business known to the commissioner from national directories or reference books or other reliable information available in the commissioners office. The commissioner shall keep a record of all services made upon the commissioner pursuant to this section. The other copy of the process, notice, or papers shall be retained among the commissioners official public records for a period not to exceed two years, absent special circumstances which in the commissioners judgment compel longer retention.
(d)Service made in the manner provided for in this section is valid and sufficient and gives jurisdiction over the person of a nonadmitted or unauthorized defendant, provided notice of such service and a copy of the process, notice, or papers being served are sent within 10 days thereafter by certified mail (or by registered mail if it is addressed to an area outside of the United States where certified mail service is not available) by plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney to the defendant at its last known principal place of business, and the receipt or the receipt of defendants agent for such copy, showing the name of the sender and the name and address of the addressee-defendant thereon, and the affidavit of plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney showing compliance with this section, are filed with the clerk of the court in which such action is pending on or before the date the defendant is required to appear, or within further time as the court may allow.
In case of service made pursuant to this section upon a licensee of the commissioner required by law to keep the licensees current business address or that of its agent for service of process on file with the commissioner, the service shall be valid if the commissioner mailed, postage prepaid, a copy of the process, notice, or papers to the defendant or licensee intended to be served to the licensees current address as shown by the commissioners records, or, in the case of an insurer, to its manager, president, or secretary, and an affidavit of compliance by plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney at law is made and filed at the place and within the time mentioned in this subdivision.
(e)A plaintiff or complainant shall not be entitled to a judgment by default in any action, suit, or proceeding in which service of process is effected in the manner provided in this section until the expiration of 30 days from the date on which the affidavit of compliance is filed.
(f)This section does not limit or abridge the right to serve any process, notice, papers, or demand upon any insurer in any other manner now or hereafter permitted by law.
(a)The Legislature finds and declares that there has been a disturbing increase in lawsuits brought primarily to chill the valid exercise of the constitutional rights of freedom of speech and petition for the redress of grievances. The Legislature finds and declares that it is in the public interest to encourage continued participation in matters of public significance, and that this participation should not be chilled through abuse of the judicial process. To this end, this section shall be construed broadly.
(b)(1)A cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in furtherance of the persons right of petition or free speech under the United States Constitution or the California Constitution in connection with a public issue shall be subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established that there is a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim.
(2)In making its determination, the court shall consider the pleadings, and supporting and opposing affidavits stating the facts upon which the liability or defense is based.
(3)If the court determines that the plaintiff has established a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim, neither that determination nor the fact of that determination shall be admissible in evidence at any later stage of the case, or in any subsequent action, and no burden of proof or degree of proof otherwise applicable shall be affected by that determination in any later stage of the case or in any subsequent proceeding.
(c)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), in any action subject to subdivision (b), a prevailing defendant on a special motion to strike shall be entitled to recover that defendants attorneys fees and costs. If the court finds that a special motion to strike is frivolous or is solely intended to cause unnecessary delay, the court shall award costs and reasonable attorneys fees to a plaintiff prevailing on the motion, pursuant to Section 128.5.
(2)A defendant who prevails on a special motion to strike in an action subject to paragraph (1) shall not be entitled to attorneys fees and costs if that cause of action is brought pursuant to Section 11130, 11130.3, 54960, or 54960.1 of the Government Code, or pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 7923.100) of Part 4 of Division 10 of Title 1 of the Government Code. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to prevent a prevailing defendant from recovering attorneys fees and costs pursuant to Section 7923.115, 11130.5, or 54960.5 of the Government Code.
(d)This section shall not apply to any enforcement action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Attorney General, Insurance Commissioner, district attorney, or city attorney, acting as a public prosecutor.
(e)As used in this section, act in furtherance of a persons right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue includes: (1) any written or oral statement or writing made before a legislative, executive, or judicial proceeding, or any other official proceeding authorized by law, (2) any written or oral statement or writing made in connection with an issue under consideration or review by a legislative, executive, or judicial body, or any other official proceeding authorized by law, (3) any written or oral statement or writing made in a place open to the public or a public forum in connection with an issue of public interest, or (4) any other conduct in furtherance of the exercise of the constitutional right of petition or the constitutional right of free speech in connection with a public issue or an issue of public interest.
(f)The special motion may be filed within 60 days of the service of the complaint or, in the courts discretion, at any later time upon terms it deems proper. The motion shall be scheduled by the clerk of the court for a hearing not more than 30 days after the service of the motion unless the docket conditions of the court require a later hearing.
(g)All discovery proceedings in the action shall be stayed upon the filing of a notice of motion made pursuant to this section. The stay of discovery shall remain in effect until notice of entry of the order ruling on the motion. The court, on noticed motion and for good cause shown, may order that specified discovery be conducted notwithstanding this subdivision.
(h)For purposes of this section, complaint includes cross-complaint and petition, plaintiff includes cross-complainant and petitioner, and defendant includes cross-defendant and respondent.
(i)An order granting or denying a special motion to strike shall be appealable under Section 904.1.
(j)(1)Any party who files a special motion to strike pursuant to this section, and any party who files an opposition to a special motion to strike, shall, promptly upon so filing, transmit to the Judicial Council, by email or facsimile, a copy of the endorsed, filed caption page of the motion or opposition, a copy of any related notice of appeal or petition for a writ, and a conformed copy of any order issued pursuant to this section, including any order granting or denying a special motion to strike, discovery, or fees.
(2)The Judicial Council shall maintain a public record of information transmitted pursuant to this subdivision for at least three years, and may store the information on microfilm or other appropriate electronic media.
SEC. 2.Section 998 of the Code of Civil Procedure is amended to read:998.(a)The costs allowed under Sections 1031 and 1032 shall be withheld or augmented as provided in this section.
(b)Not less than 10 days prior to commencement of trial or arbitration (as provided in Section 1281 or 1295) of a dispute to be resolved by arbitration, any party may serve an offer in writing upon any other party to the action to allow judgment to be taken or an award to be entered in accordance with the terms and conditions stated at that time. The written offer shall include a statement of the offer, containing the terms and conditions of the judgment or award, and a provision that allows the accepting party to indicate acceptance of the offer by signing a statement that the offer is accepted. Any acceptance of the offer, whether made on the document containing the offer or on a separate document of acceptance, shall be in writing and shall be signed by counsel for the accepting party or, if not represented by counsel, by the accepting party.
(1)If the offer is accepted, the offer with proof of acceptance shall be filed and the clerk or the judge shall enter judgment accordingly. In the case of an arbitration, the offer with proof of acceptance shall be filed with the arbitrator or arbitrators who shall promptly render an award accordingly.
(2)If the offer is not accepted prior to trial or arbitration or within 30 days after it is made, whichever occurs first, it shall be deemed withdrawn, and cannot be given in evidence upon the trial or arbitration.
(3)For purposes of this subdivision, a trial or arbitration shall be deemed to be actually commenced at the beginning of the opening statement of the plaintiff or counsel, or, if there is no opening statement, at the time of the administering of the oath or affirmation to the first witness, or the introduction of any evidence.
(c)(1)If an offer made by a defendant is not accepted and the plaintiff fails to obtain a more favorable judgment or award, the plaintiff shall not recover his or her their postoffer costs and shall pay the defendants costs from the time of the offer. In addition, in any action or proceeding other than an eminent domain action, the court or arbitrator, in its discretion, may require the plaintiff to pay a reasonable sum to cover postoffer costs of the services of expert witnesses, who are not regular employees of any party, actually incurred and reasonably necessary in either, or both, preparation for trial or arbitration, or during trial or arbitration, of the case by the defendant.
(2)(A)In determining whether the plaintiff obtains a more favorable judgment, the court or arbitrator shall exclude the postoffer costs.
(B)It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting subparagraph (A) to supersede the holding in Encinitas Plaza Real v. Knight, 209 Cal.App.3d 996, that attorneys fees awarded to the prevailing party were not costs for purposes of this section but were part of the judgment.
(d)If an offer made by a plaintiff is not accepted and the defendant fails to obtain a more favorable judgment or award in any action or proceeding other than an eminent domain action, the court or arbitrator, in its discretion, may require the defendant to pay a reasonable sum to cover postoffer costs of the services of expert witnesses, who are not regular employees of any party, actually incurred and reasonably necessary in either, or both, preparation for trial or arbitration, or during trial or arbitration, of the case by the plaintiff, in addition to plaintiffs costs.
(e)If an offer made by a defendant is not accepted and the plaintiff fails to obtain a more favorable judgment or award, the costs under this section, from the time of the offer, shall be deducted from any damages awarded in favor of the plaintiff. If the costs awarded under this section exceed the amount of the damages awarded to the plaintiff the net amount shall be awarded to the defendant and judgment or award shall be entered accordingly.
(f)Police officers shall be deemed to be expert witnesses for the purposes of this section. For purposes of this section, plaintiff includes a cross-complainant and defendant includes a cross-defendant. Any judgment or award entered pursuant to this section shall be deemed to be a compromise settlement.
(g)This chapter does not apply to either of the following:
(1)An offer that is made by a plaintiff in an eminent domain action.
(2)Any enforcement action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Attorney General, the Insurance Commissioner, a district attorney, or a city attorney, acting as a public prosecutor.
(h)The costs for services of expert witnesses for trial under subdivisions (c) and (d) shall not exceed those specified in Section 68092.5 of the Government Code.
(i)This section shall not apply to labor arbitrations filed pursuant to memoranda of understanding under the Ralph C. Dills Act (Chapter 10.3 (commencing with Section 3512) of Division 4 of Title 1 of the Government Code).
SEC. 3.Section 1749.81 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:1749.81.(a)A life agent licensed on or after January 1, 2024, who sells individual life insurance policies other than term life with no cash value shall satisfactorily complete four hours of training before soliciting individual consumers to sell nonterm those life insurance policies.
(b)A life agent who sells individual variable life insurance policies shall satisfactorily complete two hours of training before each license renewal. Completion of the four-hour annuity training required by Section 1749.8 does not satisfy the training required by this section. This training is in addition to, and is not a part of, the annuity training required by subdivision (b) of Section 1749.8. For resident licensees, this requirement shall count toward the licensees continuing education requirement, but may still result in completing more than the minimum number of continuing education hours set forth in this section.
(c)The training required by this section shall be approved by the commissioner and shall consist of topics related to the types of life insurance policies described in subdivisions (a) and (b) and California law, regulations, and requirements related to those life insurance policies, prohibited sales practices, and unfair trade practices. Subject matter determined by the commissioner to be primarily intended to promote the sale or marketing of life insurance policies shall not qualify for credit toward the training requirement. Any course or seminar that is disapproved under the provisions of this section shall be presumed invalid for credit toward the training requirement of this section unless it is approved in writing by the commissioner.
(d)This section shall become operative January 1, 2025, and applies to licenses that are issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2025.
SEC. 4.Section 1871.7 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:1871.7.(a)It is unlawful to knowingly employ runners, cappers, steerers, or other persons to procure clients or patients to perform or obtain services or benefits pursuant to Division 4 (commencing with Section 3200) of the Labor Code or to procure clients or patients to perform or obtain services or benefits under a contract of insurance or that will be the basis for a claim against an insured individual or his or her their insurer.
(b)Every person who violates any provision of this section or Section 549, 550, or 551 of the Penal Code shall be subject, in addition to any other penalties that may be prescribed by law, to a civil penalty of not less than five thousand dollars ($5,000) nor more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000), plus an assessment of not more than three times the amount of each claim for compensation, as defined in Section 3207 of the Labor Code or pursuant to a contract of insurance. The court shall have the power to grant other equitable relief, including temporary injunctive relief, as is necessary to prevent the transfer, concealment, or dissipation of illegal proceeds, or to protect the public. The penalty prescribed in this paragraph shall be assessed for each fraudulent claim presented to an insurance company by a defendant and not for each violation.
(c)The penalties set forth in subdivision (b) are intended to be remedial rather than punitive, and shall not preclude, nor be precluded by, a criminal prosecution for the same conduct. If the court finds, after considering the goals of disgorging unlawful profit, restitution, compensating the state for the costs of investigation and prosecution, and alleviating the social costs of increased insurance rates due to fraud, that such a penalty would be punitive and would preclude, or be precluded by, a criminal prosecution, the court shall reduce that penalty appropriately.
(d)The district attorney or commissioner may bring a civil action under this section. Before the commissioner may bring that action, the commissioner shall be required to present the evidence obtained to the appropriate local district attorney for possible criminal or civil filing. If the district attorney elects not to pursue the matter due to insufficient resources, matter, then the commissioner may proceed with the action.
(e)(1)Any interested persons, including an insurer, may bring a civil action for a violation of this section for the person and for the State of California. The action shall be brought in the name of the state. The action may be dismissed only if the court and the district attorney or the commissioner, whichever is participating, give written consent to the dismissal and their reasons for consenting. dismissal.
(2)A copy of the complaint and written disclosure of substantially all material evidence and information the person possesses shall be served on the district attorney and commissioner. The complaint shall be filed in camera, shall remain under seal for at least 60 days, days from the date of service on the district attorney and commissioner, and shall not be served on the defendant until the court so orders. The local district attorney or commissioner may elect to intervene and proceed with the action within 60 days after he or she the district attorney or commissioner receives both the complaint and the material evidence and information. If more than one governmental entity elects to intervene, the district attorney shall have precedence.
(3)The district attorney or commissioner may, for good cause shown, move the court for extensions of the time during which the complaint remains under seal under paragraph (2). The motions may be supported by affidavits or other submissions in camera. The defendant shall not be required to respond to any complaint filed under this section until 20 days after the complaint is unsealed and served upon the defendant.
(4)Before the expiration of the 60-day period or any extensions obtained under paragraph (3), the district attorney or commissioner shall either:
(A)Proceed with the action, in which case the action shall be conducted by the district attorney or commissioner.
(B)Notify the court that it declines to take over the action, in which case the person bringing the action shall have the right to conduct the action.
(5)When a person or governmental agency brings an action under this section, no person other than the district attorney or commissioner may intervene or bring a related action based on the facts underlying the pending action unless that action is authorized by another statute or common law.
(f)(1)If the district attorney or commissioner proceeds with the action, he or she the district attorney or commissioner shall have the primary responsibility for prosecuting the action, and shall not be bound by an act of the person bringing the action. That person shall have the right to continue as a party to the action, subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (2).
(2)(A)The district attorney or commissioner may dismiss the action notwithstanding the objections of the person initiating the action if the person has been notified by the district attorney or commissioner of the filing of the motion, and the court has provided the person with an opportunity for a hearing on the motion.
(B)The district attorney or commissioner may settle the action with the defendant notwithstanding the objections of the person initiating the action if the court determines, after a hearing, that the proposed settlement is fair, adequate, and reasonable under all the circumstances. Upon a showing of good cause, the hearing may be held in camera.
(C)Upon a showing by the district attorney or commissioner that unrestricted participation during the course of the litigation by the person initiating the action would interfere with or unduly delay the district attorneys or commissioners prosecution of the case, or would be repetitious, irrelevant, or for purposes of harassment, the court may, in its discretion, impose limitations on the persons participation, including, but not limited to, the following:
(i)Limiting the number of witnesses the person may call.
(ii)Limiting the length of the testimony of those witnesses.
(iii)Limiting the persons cross-examination of witnesses.
(iv)Otherwise limiting the participation by the person in the litigation.
(D)Upon a showing by the defendant that unrestricted participation during the course of the litigation by the person initiating the action would be for purposes of harassment or would cause the defendant undue burden or unnecessary expense, the court may limit the participation by the person in the litigation.
(3)If the district attorney or commissioner elects not to proceed with the action, the person who initiated the action shall have the right to conduct the action. If the district attorney or commissioner so requests, he or she the district attorney or commissioner shall be served with copies of all pleadings filed in the action and shall be supplied with copies of all deposition transcripts, at the district attorneys or commissioners expense. When a person proceeds with the action, the court, without limiting the status and rights of the person initiating the action, may nevertheless permit the district attorney or commissioner to intervene at a later date upon a showing of good cause.
(4)If at any time both a civil action for penalties and equitable relief pursuant to this section and a criminal action are pending against a defendant for substantially the same conduct, whether brought by the government or a private party, the civil action shall be stayed until the criminal action has been concluded at the trial court level. The stay shall not preclude the court from granting or enforcing temporary equitable relief during the pendency of the actions. Whether or not the district attorney or commissioner proceeds with the action, upon a showing by the district attorney or commissioner that certain actions of discovery by the person initiating the action would interfere with a law enforcement or governmental agency investigation or prosecution of a criminal or civil matter arising out of the same facts, the court may stay discovery for a period of not more than 180 days. A hearing on a request for the stay shall be conducted in camera. The court may extend the 180-day period upon a further showing in camera that the agency has pursued the criminal or civil investigation or proceedings with reasonable diligence and any proposed discovery in the civil action will interfere with the ongoing criminal or civil investigation or proceedings.
(5)Notwithstanding subdivision (e), the district attorney or commissioner may elect to pursue its claim through any alternate remedy available to the district attorney or commissioner.
(g)(1)(A)(i)If the district attorney proceeds with an action brought by a person under subdivision (e), that person shall, subject to subparagraph (B), receive at least 30 percent but not more than 40 percent of the proceeds of the action or settlement of the claim, depending upon the extent to which the person substantially contributed to the prosecution of the action.
(ii)If the commissioner has brought an action or has proceeded with an action brought by another person under this section on or after January 1, 2006, the commissioner shall be entitled to attorneys fees and costs in addition to any judgment, regardless of the date that judgment is entered. The court shall determine and award the commissioner the amount of reasonable attorneys fees, including, but not limited to, reasonable fees for time expended by attorneys employed by the department and for costs incurred. Any attorneys fees or costs awarded to the commissioner and collected shall be deposited in the Insurance Fund. In cases in which the commissioner has intervened, the commissioner and the person bringing the claim may stipulate to an allocation. The court may allocate the funds pursuant to the stipulation if, after the courts ruling on objection by the district attorney, if any, the court finds it is in the interests of justice to follow the stipulation.
(iii)If the commissioner has proceeded with an action, if there is no stipulation regarding allocation, and if a judgment has been obtained or a settlement has been reached with the defendants, the court shall determine the allocation, upon motion of the commissioner or the person bringing the action, according to the following priority:
(I)The person bringing the action, regardless of whether that person paid money to the defendants as part of the acts alleged in the complaint, shall first receive the amount the court determines is reasonable for attorneys fees, costs, and expenses that the court determines to have been necessarily incurred.
(II)The commissioner shall receive the amount the court determines for reasonable attorneys fees and costs.
(III)If the person bringing the suit has paid moneys to the defendants as part of the acts alleged in the complaint, that person shall receive the amount paid to the defendants.
(IV)At least 30 percent, but not more than 40 percent, of the remaining assets or moneys, shall be allocated to the person bringing the action, depending upon the extent to which the person substantially contributed to the prosecution of the action.
(iv)Those portions of a judgment or settlement not distributed pursuant to this subdivision shall be paid to the General Fund of the state and, upon appropriation by the Legislature, shall be apportioned between the Department of Justice and the Department of Insurance for enhanced fraud investigation and prevention efforts.
(B)Where the action is one that the court finds to be based primarily on disclosures of specific information, other than information provided by the person bringing the action, relating to allegations or transactions in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing, in a legislative or administrative report, hearing, audit, or investigation, or from the news media, the court may award those sums that it considers appropriate, but in no case more than 10 percent of the proceeds, taking into account the significance of the information and the role of the person bringing the action in advancing the case to litigation.
(C)Any payment to a person under subparagraph (A) or under subparagraph (B) shall be made from the proceeds. The person shall also receive an amount for reasonable expenses that the court finds to have been necessarily incurred, plus reasonable attorneys fees and costs. All of those expenses, fees, and costs shall be awarded against the defendant.
(2)(A)If the district attorney or commissioner does not proceed with an action under this section, the person bringing the action or settling the claim shall receive an amount that the court decides is reasonable for collecting the civil penalty and damages. Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the amount shall not be less than 40 percent and not more than 50 percent of the proceeds of the action or settlement and shall be paid out of the proceeds. That person shall also receive an amount for reasonable expenses that the court finds to have been necessarily incurred, plus reasonable attorneys fees and costs. All of those attorneys fees and costs shall be imposed against the defendant. The parties shall serve the commissioner and the local district attorney with complete copies of any and all settlement agreements, and terms and conditions, for actions brought under this article at least 10 days prior to filing any motion for allocation with the court under this paragraph. The court may allocate the funds pursuant to the settlement agreement if, after the courts ruling on objection by the commissioner or the local district attorney, if any, the court finds it is in the interests of justice to follow the settlement agreement.
(B)If the person bringing the action, as a result of a violation of this section has paid money to the defendant or to an attorney acting on behalf of the defendant in the underlying claim, then he or she the person shall be entitled to up to double the amount paid to the defendant or the attorney if that amount is greater than 50 percent of the proceeds. That person shall also receive an amount for reasonable expenses that the court finds to have been necessarily incurred, plus reasonable attorneys fees and costs. All of those expenses, fees, and costs shall be awarded against the defendant.
(3)If a local district attorney has proceeded with an action under this section, one-half of the penalties not awarded to a private party, as well as any costs awarded shall go to the treasurer of the appropriate county. Those funds shall be used to investigate and prosecute fraud, augmenting existing budgets rather than replacing them. All remaining funds shall go to the state and be deposited in the General Fund and, when appropriated by the Legislature, shall be apportioned between the Department of Justice and the Department of Insurance for enhanced fraud investigation and prevention efforts.
(4)Whether or not the district attorney or commissioner proceeds with the action, if the court finds that the action was brought by a person who planned and initiated the violation of this section, that person shall be dismissed from the civil action and shall not receive any share of the proceeds of the action. The dismissal shall not prejudice the right of the district attorney or commissioner to continue the action on behalf of the state.
(5)If the district attorney or commissioner does not proceed with the action, and the person bringing the action conducts the action, the court may award to the defendant its reasonable attorneys fees and expenses if the defendant prevails in the action and the court finds that the claim of the person bringing the action was clearly frivolous, clearly vexatious, or brought primarily for purposes of harassment.
(h)(1)In no event may a person bring an action under subdivision (e) that is based upon allegations or transactions that are the subject of a civil suit or an administrative civil money penalty proceeding in which the Attorney General, district attorney, or commissioner is already a party.
(2)(A)No court shall have jurisdiction over an action under this section based upon the public disclosure of allegations or transactions in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing in a legislative or administrative report, hearing, audit, or investigation, or from the news media, unless the action is brought by the Attorney General or the person bringing the action is an original source of the information.
(B)For purposes of this paragraph, original source means an individual who has direct and independent knowledge of the information on which the allegations are based and has voluntarily provided the information to the district attorney or commissioner before filing an action under this section that is based on the information.
(i)Except as provided in subdivision (j), the district attorney or commissioner is not liable for expenses that a person incurs in bringing an action under this section.
(j)In civil actions brought under this section in which the commissioner or a district attorney is a party, the court shall retain discretion to impose sanctions otherwise allowed by law, including the ability to order a party to pay expenses as provided in Sections 128.5 and 1028.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
(k)Any employee who is discharged, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed, or in any other manner discriminated against in the terms and conditions of employment by his or her their employer because of lawful acts done by the employee on behalf of the employee or others in furtherance of an action under this section, including investigation for, initiation of, testimony for, or assistance in, an action filed or to be filed under this section, shall be entitled to all relief necessary to make the employee whole. That relief shall include reinstatement with the same seniority status the employee would have had but for the discrimination, two times the amount of backpay, interest on the backpay, and compensation for any special damages sustained as a result of the discrimination, including litigation costs and reasonable attorneys fees. An employee may bring an action in the appropriate superior court for the relief provided in this subdivision. The remedies under this section are in addition to any other remedies provided by existing law.
(l)(1)An action pursuant to this section may not be filed more than three years after the discovery of the facts constituting the grounds for commencing the action.
(2)Notwithstanding paragraph (1) no action may be filed pursuant to this section more than eight years after the commission of the act constituting a violation of this section or a violation of Section 549, 550, or 551 of the Penal Code.
SEC. 5.Section 10123.857 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10123.857.(a)A health insurer that issues, sells, renews, or offers a policy covering dental services, including a specialized health insurance policy covering dental services that offers a service via telehealth to an insured through a third-party corporate telehealth provider shall report to the department, in a manner specified by the department, all of the following for each product type:
(1)The total number of services delivered via telehealth by a third-party corporate telehealth provider.
(2)For each third-party corporate telehealth provider with which it contracts, the percentage of the third-party telehealth providers contracted providers available to the insurers insured that are also network providers.
(3)For each third-party corporate telehealth provider with which it contracts, the types of telehealth services utilized by insureds, including information on the gender and age of the insured, and any other information as determined by the department.
(b)A health care insurance policy insurer that issues, sells, renews, or offers an insurance a policy covering dental services, including a specialized health care policy covering dental services that offers a service via telehealth to an insured through a third-party corporate telehealth provider, shall disclose to the insured the impact of third-party telehealth visits on the insureds benefit limitations, including frequency limitations and the insureds annual maximum.
(c)Section 10123.856 shall not apply to specialized health insurance policies covering dental services.
(d)For the purposes of this section, third-party corporate telehealth provider means a corporation that provides dental services exclusively through a telehealth technology platform and has no physical location at which a patient can receive services, and is directly contracted with a health insurer that issues, sells, renews, or offers a policy, including a specialized health insurance policy, that covers dental services.
SEC. 6.Section 11401 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:11401.(a)An association shall not operate or do business in this state without a certificate of authority. The commissioner shall issue a certificate of authority to any association unless he or she the commissioner determines, after examination, that it does not comply with the provisions of this chapter. The filing fee for the application for the certificate of authority shall be one thousand four hundred ten dollars ($1,410).
(b)(1)On or before July 1, 2019, every association shall renew its certificate of authority.(2)After July 1, 2019, an(b)An association shall renew its certificate of authority every five years from the date it previously renewed its certificate of authority. within 30 days after a change in name or address or before a merger.
(c)(1)The commissioner may revoke the certificate of authority for an association that failed to renew its certificate of authority in compliance with subdivision (b), after giving reasonable written notice mailed to the last address of the association registered with the department.
(2)The commissioner may revoke the certificate of authority for an association that has a dissolved, suspended, or otherwise inactive status according to the records of the Secretary of State, after giving reasonable written notice mailed to the last address of the association registered with the department.
(3)To obtain a reissue of a certificate of authority revoked pursuant to this subdivision, an association shall apply to the commissioner pursuant to subdivision (a).
SEC. 7.Section 12418.4 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:12418.4.(a)Sections 1667, 1668, 1669, 1670, 1729, 1729.2, 1738, 1738.5, 1742, 1743, and Article 6 (commencing with Section 12404), shall apply to all applicants or holders of a certificate of registration issued pursuant to this article.
(b)The department may revoke, suspend, restrict, or decline to issue a certificate of registration if it determines that the title marketing representative or applicant has violated provisions of Article 6 (commencing with Section 12404) pursuant to the due process and hearing requirements set forth in subdivision (c).
(c)Except as provided in Section 1669, a certificate of registration shall not be denied, restricted, suspended, or revoked without a hearing conducted in accordance with Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 11500) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(d)In addition to, or in lieu of, any other penalty that may be imposed under this article against a title marketing representative, the commissioner may bring an administrative action against a title marketing representative for any violation of the provisions of Article 6 (commencing with Section 12404). If a title marketing representative charged with a violation of Article 6 (commencing with Section 12404) is determined by the commissioner to have committed the violation, the commissioner may require the surrender of, temporarily suspend or revoke either permanently or temporarily the title marketing representatives certificate of registration, and, in addition, may impose a monetary penalty. Any payment of a monetary penalty pursuant to a settlement or final adjudication shall be made from the title marketing representatives personal funds and not by his or her their employer either directly or through the title marketing representative. This article shall not preclude an action against a company that had actual knowledge of the violation by the title marketing representative. A title marketing representative who is issued a certificate of registration under this article may not engage in any activity that is otherwise prohibited through a separate entity controlled by the title marketing representative or by the company or entity that employs him or her. the title marketing representative.
(e)A title marketing representative who has his or her their certificate of registration revoked by the department shall not be permitted to reapply for another certificate of registration with the department for five years from the date of revocation.
SEC. 8.Section 12752 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:12752.(a)A home protection company shall file an annual statement exhibiting its conditions and affairs in accordance with Sections 900, 900.5, 900.8, 900.9, 902, 903, 903.5, 904, 922.1 to 922.8, inclusive, 923, 923.5, and 924. However, the required contents of the annual statement may vary from the requirements thereof, pursuant to regulations adopted by the commissioner in accordance with Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, so as to adapt the requirements to the home protection business. This subdivision shall not be construed to limit the authority of the commissioner to request financial statements from licensees at any time.
(b)The commissioner shall, before licensure and at other times as appears necessary, examine the business and affairs of a home protection company subject to this part. A home protection company so examined shall open its books and records for inspection by the commissioner and shall otherwise facilitate and cooperate in the examination. In making the examination, the commissioner shall have the rights specified in Section 733, and the examinee shall be subject to the obligations of Section 736. The commissioner shall not conduct more than one financial examination of a company in a five-year period, unless the commissioner finds that the financial condition of the company has deteriorated, thereby warranting an interim examination.
(c)The commissioner may extend the period between examinations up to two additional years if the commissioner determines that conditions warrant the extension. In making that determination, the commissioner may consider all of the following factors:
(1)The companys reserves.
(2)The companys net worth.
(3)Any other factors the commissioner considers relevant.
(d)In addition to the financial examination conducted pursuant to subdivision (b), the commissioner may request a home protection company to furnish the department with a financial audit by an independent certified public accountant.
SEC. 9.Section 12931 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:12931.(a)Service of legal process, notices, or other papers described in or referred to by Section 1452, 1605, 1610, 1612, 1659, 1660, 11104, or 11105 may be made upon the commissioner in the instances enumerated in this section and under the circumstances prescribed in this section by delivering to the commissioner commissioner, the commissioners deputy, or the commissioners deputy designated agent for service of process two copies thereof for each person or party defendant so served accompanied by payment of twelve dollars ($12) a substituted service fee as determined pursuant to Section 12978 for each such person or party, and by complying with the other provisions of this section.
(b)The situations under which such service may be so made and the circumstances under which these provisions apply are:
(1)Where for any reason the person desiring to have service so made elects to serve the commissioner instead of the attorney in fact, as stipulated pursuant to Section 1323, of a reciprocal or interinsurance exchange, domestic, foreign, admitted, or nonadmitted.
(2)Where service is to be made on an admitted foreign or alien insurer, when service cannot be made on the principal statutory agent of such insurer duly appointed pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 1600) of Chapter 4 of Part 2 of Division 1 for reasons specified in Section 1604 or otherwise recognized by law.
(3)In actions against nonadmitted insurers, including nonadmitted fraternal benefit societies and reciprocals, under the circumstances described in Article 4 (commencing with Section 1610) of Chapter 4 of Part 2 of Division 1. This provision shall not apply to actions brought under insurance policies or certificates issued by nonadmitted insurers placed by surplus line brokers or special lines surplus line brokers where such insurance contract names a resident of this state as agent for service of process.
(4)In the instances described by Section 1659 relating to nonresident California-licensed insurance agents, brokers, and life agents. (5)(4)In actions involving admitted and formerly admitted fraternal benefit societies as described in Section 11104.
(c)Upon receipt of two copies of the process, notice, or papers to be served and the fee above prescribed, the commissioner shall promptly mail one of the copies by certified mail (or by registered mail if it is addressed to an area outside of the United States where certified mail service is not available) to the defendant or person to be served at the last principal place of business of the defendant or person to be served, known to the commissioner by the commissioners official records in the case of a licensee; otherwise, in the case of a nonadmitted insurer, to its last principal place of business known to the commissioner from national directories or reference books or other reliable information available in the commissioners office. The commissioner shall keep a record of all services made upon the commissioner pursuant to this section. The other copy of the process, notice, or papers shall be retained among the commissioners official public records for a period not to exceed two years, absent special circumstances which in the commissioners judgment compel longer retention.
(d)Service made in the manner provided for in this section is valid and sufficient and gives jurisdiction over the person of a nonadmitted or unauthorized defendant, provided notice of such service and a copy of the process, notice, or papers being served are sent within 10 days thereafter by certified mail (or by registered mail if it is addressed to an area outside of the United States where certified mail service is not available) by plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney to the defendant at its last known principal place of business, and the receipt or the receipt of defendants agent for such copy, showing the name of the sender and the name and address of the addressee-defendant thereon, and the affidavit of plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney showing compliance with this section, are filed with the clerk of the court in which such action is pending on or before the date the defendant is required to appear, or within further time as the court may allow.
In case of service made pursuant to this section upon a licensee of the commissioner required by law to keep the licensees current business address or that of its agent for service of process on file with the commissioner, the service shall be valid if the commissioner mailed, postage prepaid, a copy of the process, notice, or papers to the defendant or licensee intended to be served to the licensees current address as shown by the commissioners records, or, in the case of an insurer, to its manager, president, or secretary, and an affidavit of compliance by plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney at law is made and filed at the place and within the time mentioned in this subdivision.
(e)No A plaintiff or complainant shall not be entitled to a judgment by default in any action, suit, or proceeding in which service of process is effected in the manner provided in this section until the expiration of 30 days from the date on which the affidavit of compliance is filed.
(f)Nothing in this section shall This section does not limit or abridge the right to serve any process, notice, papers, or demand upon any insurer in any other manner now or hereafter permitted by law.
SECTION 1.Section 13157 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:13157.The California Fire Service Training and Education Program is hereby established in the office of the State Fire Marshal.The State Fire Marshal, with policy guidance and advice from the State Board of Fire Services, shall carry out the management of the California Fire Service Training and Education Program and shall have the authority to:(a) Promulgate and adopt rules and regulations necessary for implementation of the program.(b) Establish the courses of study and curriculum to be used in the program.(c) Establish prerequisites for the admission of personnel who attend courses offered in the program.(d) (1)Establish and collect admission fees and other fees that may be necessary to be charged for seminars, conferences, and specialized training given, consistent with the terms of paragraph (2).(2)The State Fire Marshal may establish and collect admission fees and other fees as described in paragraph (1) only to the extent that other private funding sources for the seminars, conferences, and specialized training are insufficient to cover the necessary costs of the seminars, conferences, and specialized training. (e) Collect such fees as may be established pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 13159.8.SEC. 2.Section 13159.8 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:13159.8.The State Fire Marshal, with policy guidance and advice from the State Board of Fire Services, shall:(a) Establish and validate recommended minimum standards for fire protection personnel and fire protection instructors at all career levels.(b) Develop course curricula for arson, fire technology, and apprenticeship training for use in academies, colleges, and other educational institutions.(c) Develop, validate, update, copyright, and maintain security over a complete series of promotional examinations based on the minimum standards established pursuant to subdivision (a).(d) Have the authority to make the examinations developed pursuant to subdivision (c) available to any agency of the state, to any political subdivision within the state, or to any other testing organization, as the State Fire Marshal deems appropriate.(e) (1)Establish any fees that are necessary to implement this section, consistent with the terms of paragraph (2). However, the State Fire Marshal shall not establish or collect any fees for training classes provided by the State Fire Marshal to fire protection personnel relating to state laws and regulation which local fire services are authorized or required to enforce.(2)The State Fire Marshal may establish fees pursuant to paragraph (1) only to the extent that other private funding sources for the purposes of implementing this section are insufficient to cover the necessary costs of implementing this section.(f) Promote, sponsor, and administer the California Fire Academy System.(g) Establish procedures for seeking, accepting, and administering gifts and grants for use in implementing the intents and purposes of the California Fire and Arson Training Act.(h) The recommended minimum standards established pursuant to subdivision (a) shall not apply to any agency of the state or any agency of any political subdivision within the state unless that agency elects to be subject to these standards.The California Fire Service Training and Education Program is hereby established in the office of the State Fire Marshal.
The State Fire Marshal, with policy guidance and advice from the State Board of Fire Services, shall carry out the management of the California Fire Service Training and Education Program and shall have the authority to:
(a) Promulgate and adopt rules and regulations necessary for implementation of the program.
(b) Establish the courses of study and curriculum to be used in the program.
(c) Establish prerequisites for the admission of personnel who attend courses offered in the program.
(d) (1)Establish and collect admission fees and other fees that may be necessary to be charged for seminars, conferences, and specialized training given, consistent with the terms of paragraph (2).
(2)The State Fire Marshal may establish and collect admission fees and other fees as described in paragraph (1) only to the extent that state appropriations and other private funding sources for those the seminars, conferences, and specialized training are insufficient to cover the necessary costs of those the seminars, conferences, and specialized training.
(e) Collect such fees as may be established pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 13159.8.
SEC. 2.Section 13159.8 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:13159.8.The State Fire Marshal, with policy guidance and advice from the State Board of Fire Services, shall:
(a) Establish and validate recommended minimum standards for fire protection personnel and fire protection instructors at all career levels.
(b) Develop course curricula for arson, fire technology, and apprenticeship training for use in academies, colleges, and other educational institutions.
(c) Develop, validate, update, copyright, and maintain security over a complete series of promotional examinations based on the minimum standards established pursuant to subdivision (a).
(d) Have the authority to make the examinations developed pursuant to subdivision (c) available to any agency of the state, to any political subdivision within the state, or to any other testing organization, as the State Fire Marshal deems appropriate.
(e) (1)Establish any fees that are necessary to implement this section, consistent with the terms of paragraph (2). However, the State Fire Marshal shall not establish or collect any fees for training classes provided by the State Fire Marshal to fire protection personnel relating to state laws and regulation which local fire services are authorized or required to enforce.
(2)The State Fire Marshal may establish fees pursuant to paragraph (1) only to the extent that state appropriations and other private funding sources for the purposes of implementing this section are insufficient to cover the necessary costs of implementing this section.
(f) Promote, sponsor, and administer the California Fire Academy System.
(g) Establish procedures for seeking, accepting, and administering gifts and grants for use in implementing the intents and purposes of the California Fire and Arson Training Act.
(h) The recommended minimum standards established pursuant to subdivision (a) shall not apply to any agency of the state or any agency of any political subdivision within the state unless that agency elects to be subject to these standards.
The California Fire Service Training and Education Program is hereby established in the office of the State Fire Marshal.
The State Fire Marshal, with policy guidance and advice from the State Board of Fire Services, shall carry out the management of the California Fire Service Training and Education Program and shall have the authority to:
(a) Promulgate and adopt rules and regulations necessary for implementation of the program.
(b) Establish the courses of study and curriculum to be used in the program.
(c) Establish prerequisites for the admission of personnel who attend courses offered in the program.
(d) (1)Establish and collect admission fees and other fees that may be necessary to be charged for seminars, conferences, and specialized training given, which shall not be deducted from state appropriations for the purposes of this program. given, consistent with the terms of paragraph (2).
(2)The State Fire Marshal may establish and collect admission fees and other fees as described in paragraph (1) only to the extent that state appropriations and other funding sources for those seminars, conferences, and specialized training are insufficient to cover the necessary costs of those seminars, conferences, and specialized training.
(e) Collect such fees as may be established pursuant to subdivision (d) (e) of Section 13142.4. 13159.8.
SEC. 2.Section 13159.8 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:13159.8.The State Fire Marshal, with policy guidance and advice from the State Board of Fire Services, shall:
(a) Establish and validate recommended minimum standards for fire protection personnel and fire protection instructors at all career levels.
(b) Develop course curricula for arson, fire technology, and apprenticeship training for use in academies, colleges, and other educational institutions.
(c) Develop, validate, update, copyright, and maintain security over a complete series of promotional examinations based on the minimum standards established pursuant to subdivision (a).
(d) Have the authority to make the examinations developed pursuant to subdivision (c) available to any agency of the state, to any political subdivision within the state, or to any other testing organization, as he or she the State Fire Marshal deems appropriate.
(e) (1)Establish any fees which that are necessary to implement this section. section, consistent with the terms of paragraph (2). However, the State Fire Marshal shall not establish or collect any fees for training classes provided by the State Fire Marshal to fire protection personnel relating to state laws and regulation which local fire services are authorized or required to enforce.
(2)The State Fire Marshal may establish fees pursuant to paragraph (1) only to the extent that state appropriations and other funding sources for the purposes of implementing this section are insufficient to cover the necessary costs of implementing this section.
(f) Promote, sponsor, and administer the California Fire Academy System.
(g) Establish procedures for seeking, accepting, and administering gifts and grants for use in implementing the intents and purposes of the California Fire and Arson Training Act.
(h) The recommended minimum standards established pursuant to subdivision (a) shall not apply to any agency of the state or any agency of any political subdivision within the state unless that agency elects to be subject to these standards.
|
Date
|
Status
|
|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2024 | Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 444, Statutes of 2024. |
| Sep 22, 2024 | Approved by the Governor. |
| Sep 9, 2024 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m. |
| Aug 29, 2024 | Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 5654.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling. |
| Aug 15, 2024 | In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending. |
| Aug 15, 2024 | Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 6320.) Ordered to the Senate. |
| Aug 8, 2024 | Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar. |
| Aug 7, 2024 | From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (August 7). |
| Jun 26, 2024 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Jun 17, 2024 | From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on INS. |
| Jun 13, 2024 | Read third time and amended. |
| Jun 13, 2024 | Re-referred to Com. on INS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2. |
| Jun 13, 2024 | Ordered to third reading. |
| Jun 12, 2024 | Ordered to third reading. |
| Jun 12, 2024 | From inactive file. |
| Jun 11, 2024 | Notice of intention to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Calderon. |
| Sep 6, 2023 | Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Bryan. |
| Sep 5, 2023 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| Sep 1, 2023 | Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading. |
| Sep 1, 2023 | From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (September 1). |
| Aug 23, 2023 | August 23 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file. |
| Jul 11, 2023 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Jun 8, 2023 | Referred to Com. on E.M. |
| May 25, 2023 | In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk. |
| May 25, 2023 | Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 1302.) Ordered to the Assembly. |
| May 23, 2023 | Ordered to special consent calendar. |
| May 18, 2023 | Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| May 18, 2023 | From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1175.) (May 18). |
| May 12, 2023 | Set for hearing May 18. |
| Apr 10, 2023 | April 10 hearing: Placed on APPR suspense file. |
| Mar 29, 2023 | Set for hearing April 10. |
| Mar 28, 2023 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0. Page 546.) (March 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Mar 14, 2023 | Set for hearing March 28. |
| Feb 22, 2023 | Referred to Com. on G.O. |
| Feb 16, 2023 | From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 18. |
| Feb 15, 2023 | Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print. |
|
Date
|
Description
|
Location
|
Votes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2024 | Unfinished Business SB577 Hurtado et al. Concurrence | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| Aug 15, 2024 | SB 577 Hurtado Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session | Assembly Floor |
Passed |
|
| Aug 7, 2024 | Do pass. To Consent Calendar. | Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Jun 26, 2024 | Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar | Assembly Standing Committee on Insurance |
Passed |
|
| Sep 1, 2023 | Do pass as amended. | Assembly Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Jul 10, 2023 | Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar | Assembly Standing Committee on Emergency Management |
Passed |
|
| May 25, 2023 | Special Consent SB577 Hurtado | Senate Floor |
Passed |
|
| May 18, 2023 | Do pass | Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Apr 10, 2023 | Placed on suspense file | Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations |
Passed |
|
| Mar 28, 2023 | Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar | Senate Standing Committee on Governmental Organization |
Passed |
This list shows positions taken on this bill by organizations on the date displayed, which is linked to the original source.
Positions by individuals are not included.
|
Organization
|
Position
|
Date
|
|---|---|---|
| Administrative Fire Services Section – North | ** Support | |
| Albany Fire Department | ** Support | |
| Anderson Valley Community Services District / Fire Department | ** Support | |
| California Fire Chiefs Association | ** Support | |
| California Special Districts Association | ** Support | |
| City of Albany | ** Support | |
| City of Clovis Fire Department | ** Support | |
| City of Hanford Fire Departments | ** Support | |
| City of Lodi Fire Department | ** Support | |
| City of Oxnard Fire Department | ** Support | |
| City of Pasadena | ** Support | |
| City of Torrance Fire Department | ** Support | |
| Clovis Fire Department | ** Support | |
| Cosumnes Fire Department | ** Support | |
| El Dorado Hills Fire Department | ** Support | |
| Fire Districts Association Of California | ** Support | |
| Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara / California Department of Insurance | ** Support | |
| Lake Valley Fire Protection District | ** Support | |
| McCloud Fire Department | ** Support | |
| Mendocino County Fire Investigation Unit | ** Support | |
| North County Fire Authority | ** Support | |
| Northshore Fire Protection District | ** Support | |
| Novato Fire Protection District | ** Support | |
| Orange County Fire Authority | ** Support | |
| Oxnard Fire Department | ** Support | |
| Palomar Community College District | ** Support | |
| Pasadena Fire Department | ** Support | |
| Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District | ** Support | |
| Sierra College | ** Support | |
| Sonoma County Fire Chiefs Association | ** Support | |
| Sonoma County Fire District | ** Support | |
| Sonoma Valley Fire District | ** Support | |
| Ukiah Valley Fire Authority | ** Support |
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | SB 577 |
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Bill No: SB 577
Author: Hurtado (D), et al.
Amended: 6/17/24
Vote: 21
SENATE GOVERNMENTAL ORG. COMMITTEE: 14-0, 3/28/23
AYES: Dodd, Wilk, Alvarado-Gil, Ashby, Bradford, Glazer, Jones, Nguyen, Ochoa Bogh, Padilla, Portantino, Roth, Rubio, Seyarto
NO VOTE RECORDED: Archuleta
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 7-0, 5/18/23
AYES: Portantino, Jones, Ashby, Bradford, Seyarto, Wahab, Wiener
SENATE FLOOR: 40-0, 5/25/23
AYES: Allen, Alvarado-Gil, Archuleta, Ashby, Atkins, Becker, Blakespear, Bradford, Caballero, Cortese, Dahle, Dodd, Durazo, Eggman, Glazer, Gonzalez, Grove, Hurtado, Jones, Laird, Limón, McGuire, Menjivar, Min, Newman, Nguyen, Niello, Ochoa Bogh, Padilla, Portantino, Roth, Rubio, Seyarto, Skinner, Smallwood-Cuevas, Stern, Umberg, Wahab, Wiener, Wilk
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 75-0, 8/15/24 (Consent) - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Insurance
SOURCE: Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara / California Department of Insurance
DIGEST:
This bill makes several changes that are non-controversial, technical, or otherwise classified as code cleanup related to insurance.
Assembly Amendments
delete the previous contents of the measure were deleted and now the measure pertains to relevant insurance code cleanup. Provisions in this measure were identified by the California Department of Insurance (CDI) and vetted with stakeholders to reach consensus. The changes made by this bill are technical and corrective in nature. This measure is sponsored by CDI.
ANALYSIS: Existing law provides for the regulation of insurers, agents and brokers, and other insurance-like organizations by the Insurance Commissioner, and imposes a broad range of financial solvency, licensing and market behavior requirements, as set forth in the Insurance Code.
This bill makes several changes that are non-controversial, technical, or otherwise classified as code cleanup related to insurance. Specifically, this bill:
- Authorizes the Insurance Commissioner to proceed with an action if the district attorney elects not to pursue the matter for any reason.
- Eliminates the requirement that the Insurance Commissioner give a reason for consenting to dismissal of an action brought by an interested person.
- Requires an association to renew its certificate of authority within 30 days after a change in name, address, or before a merger.
- Exempts an enforcement action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Insurance Commissioner under specified procedures.
- Clarifies that life insurance training courses apply to life agents who sell individual life insurance policies and individual life insurance policies.
- Adds the Insurance Commissioner’s designated agent for service of process.
- Changes the service fee from $12 to a service fee determined by the Insurance Commissioner.
- Makes technical and conforming changes.
Comments
This bill includes several changes that are non-controversial, technical, or otherwise classified as code cleanup. Specifically:
- Makes technical changes to the statute to correct mistakes and removes repealed sections. Corrections must be made to make these statues accurate and consistent with related statutes. It would remove the repealed sections 1659, 1660; and adds the commissioner’s designated agent for service of process, so it’s clear that the department is authorized to accept service on behalf of the commissioner. Removes subdivision (b)(4) because of the repealed Section 1659, and then re-numbers the subdivision below it to accurately reflect the correct numbering of this code section.
- Amendments to the applicability language in CIC 10123.857(b): This correction would make the statute uniform with itself (the statute uses the correct applicability language in subdivision (a)) and the rest of the Insurance Code.
- To clarify procedural aspects related to the Commissioner’s prosecution of civil enforcement cases under the IPFA.
- Amends to explicitly include 1742. The section does not specifically mention 1742, however CDI is already doing this and has legal authority. Not changing enforcement or process as-is, only codifying existing authority and process.
- In the recent statutory cycle of examinations of home protection companies (from examination years 2021 to 2022), various issues related to financial reporting, booking, and record-keeping were noted. This amend provides a tool for the department to use to help ensure accurate financial tracking, as related to financial exemptions to examinations.
- Amend CIC 1749.81(a) and CIC 1749.81(b) to clarify intent
- Amend CIC Section 11401 regarding Benefit Associations: CDI oversees police, fire, and peace officer benefit associations, which offer disability benefits to members. Would amend CIC § 11401 so that certain benefit associations only have to renew their certificates of authority after a significant change, rather than every five years.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No
SUPPORT: (Verified 8/15/24)
Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara / California Department of Insurance (source)
OPPOSITION: (Verified 8/15/24)
None received
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: According to Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara, this bill “proposes amendments identified by the California Department of Insurance (CDI) to clarify and cleanup obsolete and superseded code sections.
“Specifically, among other clarifying amendments, SB 577 would:
• CIC 12931: Current law references two repealed statutes (Insurance Code sections 1659 and 1660). The legal process service fee is outdated at twelve dollars ($12) and should be updated to the current fee of thirty-two dollars ($32). This update ensures consumers submit the correct fee, preventing processing delays and reducing the need for CDI staff to contact consumers for corrections.
“• CIC 10123.857(b): The current provision incorrectly applies to a “policy that issues, sells, renews, or offers an insurance policy”, which is not feasible as policies cannot perform the actions listed in this section. This amendment will align the language in subdivision(b) with the standard applicability language used in subdivision(a) and other provisions of the insurance code, ensuring consistency and clarity.
“• CIC 1749.81(a) and (b) Amendment: The current language is unclear regarding training requirements for agents selling term life policies with cash value. It mistakenly suggests agents need training for products they do not sell. Replacing the term “nonterm” with “those” to clarify that training is only required for agents selling term life products with cast value, not for other products they do not sell.
“• Insurance Frauds Prevention Act (CIC 1871.7): Amend Subdivision (d), (e)(1) and (e)(2) to clarify procedural aspects related to the Commissioner’s prosecution of civil enforcement cases under the Insurance Frauds Prevention Act (IFPA).
“• CIC 12418.4 Amendment: Explicitly includes section 1742 in statute. This amendment codifies existing authority and process without changing enforcement or procedures.
“• CIC 11401: Currently, benefit associations must renew their certificates of authority every five years. The amendment changes this requirement so that renewals are only needed after a significant change, streamlining the process for police, fire, and peace officer benefit associations that offer disability benefits to members.
“Finally, SB 577 is technical in nature and continues to be reviewed by stakeholders, and, therefore, should be non-controversial.”
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 75-0, 8/15/24
AYES: Addis, Aguiar-Curry, Alanis, Arambula, Bains, Bauer-Kahan, Bennett, Berman, Boerner, Bonta, Bryan, Calderon, Juan Carrillo, Wendy Carrillo, Cervantes, Connolly, Megan Dahle, Davies, Dixon, Essayli, Mike Fong, Friedman, Gabriel, Gallagher, Garcia, Gipson, Grayson, Haney, Hart, Hoover, Irwin, Jackson, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Lackey, Lee, Low, Lowenthal, Maienschein, Mathis, McCarty, McKinnor, Muratsuchi, Stephanie Nguyen, Ortega, Pacheco, Papan, Jim Patterson, Joe Patterson, Pellerin, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Rendon, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Sanchez, Santiago, Schiavo, Soria, Ta, Ting, Valencia, Villapudua, Waldron, Wallis, Ward, Weber, Wicks, Wilson, Wood, Zbur, Robert Rivas
NO VOTE RECORDED: Alvarez, Chen, Flora, Holden
Prepared by: Jill Rice / INS. / (916) 651-4110
8/16/24 12:47:45
**** END ****
Date of Hearing: August 7, 2024
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Buffy Wicks, Chair
SBPCA Bill Id:SB 577
Author:(Hurtado) – As Amended Ver:June 17, 2024
Policy Committee: | Emergency Management | Vote: | (not relevant) |
Insurance | 15 - 0 | ||
|
|
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY:
This bill makes various changes to the Insurance Code, including revising the applicability of various legal procedures to the Insurance Commissioner (IC).
Specifically, this bill, among other provisions:
- Provides that an enforcement action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the IC is not subject to a special motion to strike otherwise applicable in cases related to a person’s right of petition or free speech in connection with a public issue, nor subject to civil procedure rules regarding offers by a party to compromise.
- Provides that the IC may proceed with certain actions to enforce workers’ compensation rules if a district attorney elects not to pursue the matter, regardless of the district attorney’s reason, and provides that the IC is not required to give a reason for consenting to the dismissal of certain actions.
- Authorizes service of legal process upon the IC to also be made to the IC’s designated agent for such purpose and adjusts the amount of the accompanying service fee.
- Clarifies training provisions for life agents selling certain individual life insurance policies.
- Requires certain associations issued a certificate of authority by the IC to renew their certificate within 30 days after a change in name or address, or before a merger, instead of every five years, as required by current law.
FISCAL EFFECT:
- Negligible costs reported by the Department of Insurance (CDI) and Department of Justice.
- By ensuring certain civil actions brought by the IC may proceed, this bill may result in new actions filed by the IC, thus increasing cost pressures of an unknown amount to the state court system. However, the magnitude of such actions is likely small.
COMMENTS:
- Purpose. According to the author, this omnibus bill “introduces non-controversial, technical, and code cleanup changes” and “aims to improve clarity and efficiency in insurance regulations through technical, non-substantive amendments.” This bill is sponsored by IC Ricardo Lara.
- Various Code of Civil Procedure and Insurance Code Revisions. Existing law prevents a defendant from utilizing a special motion to strike in certain free speech cases brought by the Attorney General, district attorney, or city attorney. This bill adds the IC to the list of public officials, exempting an action brought by the IC from the special motion so potentially valuable litigation is not dismissed.
Existing law allows the IC to bring certain civil actions to enforce the prohibition on employing runners, capers, steerers, or other persons to procure clients or patients under the workers’ compensation system. The IC must first present evidence obtained to the appropriate local district attorney for potential criminal or civil filing. Existing law allows the IC to proceed with the action if the district attorney chooses not to pursue the matter due to insufficient resources. This bill strikes the reference to “insufficient resources” to clarify the IC may proceed when a district attorney opts not to intervene for any reason.
Existing law prescribes the rules for service of legal process upon the IC, to be accompanied by a payment of $12. This bill updates the statute to reflect the actual current fee of $32, thus ensuring consumers submit the correct fee and preventing processing delays.
SB 263 (Dodd), Chapter 2, Statutes of 2024, requires a life agent who sells individual life insurance policies, other than term life with no cash value, to complete specified training before engaging in the sale of “nonterm” policies. This bill clarifies the training requirement applies to agents selling term life products with cash value.
AB 2045 (Committee on Insurance), Chapter 231, Statutes of 2018, requires a peace officer or firefighter relief and benefit association to submit a renewal form for its certificate of authority every five years. This bill streamlines the requirement so that renewal is needed only after a significant change in the association’s organization occurs.
Analysis Prepared by: Irene Ho / APPR. / (916) 319-2081
Date of Hearing: June 26, 2024
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON INSURANCE
Lisa Calderon, Chair
SBPCA Bill Id:SB 577
Author:(Hurtado) – As Amended Ver:June 18, 2024
SENATE VOTE: Vote not relevant
SUBJECT: Insurance
SUMMARY: Makes several changes that are non-controversial, technical, or otherwise classified as code cleanup related to insurance. Specifically, this bill:
- Authorizes the Insurance Commissioner to proceed with an action if the district attorney elects not to pursue the matter for any reason.
- Eliminates the requirement that the Insurance Commissioner give a reason for consenting to dismissal of an action brought by an interested person.
- Requires an association to renew its certificate of authority within 30 days after a change in name, address, or before a merger.
- Exempts an enforcement action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Insurance Commissioner under specified procedures.
- Clarifies that life insurance training courses apply to life agents who sell individual life insurance policies and individual life insurance policies.
- Adds the Insurance Commissioner’s designated agent for service of process.
- Changes the service fee from $12 to a service fee determined by the Insurance Commissioner.
- Makes technical and conforming changes.
EXISTING LAW: Provides for the regulation of insurers, agents and brokers, and other insurance-like organizations by the Insurance Commissioner, and imposes a broad range of financial solvency, licensing and market behavior requirements, as set forth in the Insurance Code.
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown
COMMENTS:
- Background: The previous contents of the measure were deleted and now the measure pertains to relevant insurance code cleanup. Provisions in this measure were identified by the California Department of Insurance (CDI) and vetted with stakeholders to reach consensus. The majority of the changes made by this bill are technical and corrective in nature. This measure is sponsored by CDI.
The changes addressed in this measure do the following:
- Current law references two repealed statutes (Insurance Code sections 1659 and 1660). The legal process service fee is outdated at twelve dollars ($12) and should be updated to the current fee of thirty-two dollars ($32). This update ensures consumers submit the correct fee, preventing processing delays and reducing the need for CDI staff to contact consumers for corrections.
- Insurance Code, section 10123.857 incorrectly applies to a “policy that issues, sells, renews, or offers an insurance policy”, which is not feasible as policies cannot perform the actions listed in this section. This amendment will align the language in subdivision(b) with the standard applicability language used in subdivision(a) and other provisions of the insurance code, ensuring consistency and clarity.
- Existing law is unclear regarding training requirements for agents selling term life policies with cash value. It mistakenly suggests agents need training for products they do not sell. Replacing the term “nonterm” with” those” to clarify that training is only required for agents selling term life products with cast value, not for other products they do not sell.
- Clarifies procedural aspects related to the Commissioner’s prosecution of civil enforcement cases under the Insurance Frauds Prevention Act (IFPA).
- Explicitly includes section 1742 in statute. This amendment codifies existing authority and process without changing enforcement or procedures.
- Gut and amend: This measure was substantially amended on June 13, 2024 and the contents are now in the purview of the Assembly Insurance Committee. Should the contents evolve further, the committee retains the right to call the bill back.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara / California Department of Insurance
Opposition
None on file.
Analysis Prepared by: Kathleen O'Malley / INS. / (916) 319-2086
SENATE THIRD READING
STR Bill Id:SB 577
Author:(Hurtado)
As Amended Ver:September 1, 2023
Majority vote
SUMMARY
This bill authorizes the State Fire Marshal (SFM) to establish and collect the admission and other fees associated with the California Fire Services Training and Education Program (Program, and to establish the California Fire and Arson Training Act (Act), only to the extent that state that other private funding sources are insufficient to cover the necessary associated costs.
Major Provisions
Authorizes the SFM to establish and collect admission fees and other fees only to the extent that other private funding sources for those seminars, conferences, and specialized training are insufficient to cover the necessary costs of those seminars, conferences, and specialized training.
COMMENTS
This bill is co-sponsored by the California Fire Chiefs Association and the Fire Districts Association of California and supported by various local cities, fire departments, and fire districts. In the era of climate change, the fire service is regularly responding to mass conflagration wildfires, and the need for well-trained fire personnel has never been greater. Central to achieving this goal is making SFT courses accessible and affordable to all fire personnel, especially the next generation of firefighters. SFT has historically provided these services at a minimal cost to its users. However, doing so in an increasingly complex and expanding fire protection arena has resulted in funding shortfalls, requiring a significant increase in their fees. According to the author, This bill would authorize SFM to establish and collect the admission fees and other fees associated with the CFSTEP, and to establish the fees to implement the California Fire and Arson Training Act, only to the extent that state appropriations and other funding sources are insufficient to cover the necessary costs of the activities eligible to be paid from those fees.
California State Fire Training (SFT): The SFT is a division within the Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM), which establishes, develops, and delivers standardized training and education for the California fire service. The SFT annually develops a curriculum development plan for courses to be updated or added to the CFSTES and CFSTEP. SFT curriculum is designed using the State Fire Training Curriculum Development Model. SFT is responsible for establishing the rules and regulations, course development, course delivery, and testing for over 75 courses and certificates. These courses are critical to training firefighters to provide state-of-the-art protection to everyone in need in the state. The program includes pre-servicing training through 60 accredited community colleges, accredited fire academies, and private vendors. Over 10,000 paid and volunteer firefighters participate in these programs every year. And these training programs are expanding to meet the reality of California, where wildfires, floods, and other disasters occur year-round.
Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM): OSFM's mission is to protect life and property by developing and applying fire prevention engineering, education, and enforcement. The principal functions of OFSM are to foster, promote and develop ways and means of protecting life and property against fire and panic. OSFM achieves these functions through several major program elements, including engineering, education, enforcement, and the State Board of Fire Services (Board) support. The Board provides a forum for addressing fire protection and prevention issues of statewide concern; develops technical and performance standards for training of fire service personnel; accredits curriculum; establishes policy for the certification system for the California Fire Service; advises the SFM on the dissemination of regulations; and sits as an appeals board on the application of California State Fire Marshal regulations.
According to the Author
This bill allows the State Fire Marshal to accept additional funding sources for the California Fire Service Training and Education Program. The bill would make the same change relative to the California Fire and Arson Training Act. Due to the enormous risk of fire and other disasters that face California, we must make State Fire Training an affordable solution for our paid and volunteer firefighters, as well as students wishing to enter the fire service.
Arguments in Support
The California Fire Chiefs Association writes in support, "this bill is designed to provide a wider scope of sources to support funding for state fire service training and education. Specifically, the bill will allow the State Fire Marshal to accept funding beyond user fees both to assist those of limited means to enter fire training programs and to aid those seeking the expanded certification opportunities that now exist."
Arguments in Opposition
None on file.
FISCAL COMMENTS
According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, "1) The Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) notes that the California State Fire Training (SFT) division within the SFM does not generally receive state budget appropriations, as the program is fully funded through user fees (General Fund).
2) To the extent sufficient private funding is provided to offset the need for fees, there may be an unpredictable increase in system use, resulting in an increase in course requests and certification applications. Depending on the magnitude of such an increase, CAL FIRE may need to hire additional positions to assist with course scheduling and processing, certification issuance, instructor registration, and other curriculum-related duties. CAL FIRE may also need one additional pool vehicle to facilitate stakeholder engagement, and need to expand the number of licensed users for its records management system (California Fire and Arson Training Fund)."
VOTES
SENATE FLOOR: 40-0-0
YES: Allen, Alvarado-Gil, Archuleta, Ashby, Atkins, Becker, Blakespear, Bradford, Caballero, Cortese, Dahle, Dodd, Durazo, Eggman, Glazer, Gonzalez, Grove, Hurtado, Jones, Laird, Limón, McGuire, Menjivar, Min, Newman, Nguyen, Niello, Ochoa Bogh, Padilla, Portantino, Roth, Rubio, Seyarto, Skinner, Smallwood-Cuevas, Stern, Umberg, Wahab, Wiener, Wilk
ASM EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT: 6-0-1
YES: Rodriguez, Waldron, Aguiar-Curry, Calderon, Megan Dahle, Schiavo
ABS, ABST OR NV: Alvarez
ASM APPROPRIATIONS: 11-0-5
YES: Holden, Bryan, Calderon, Wendy Carrillo, Mike Fong, Hart, Lowenthal, Papan, Pellerin, Weber, Wilson
ABS, ABST OR NV: Megan Dahle, Dixon, Mathis, Sanchez, Soria
UPDATED
VERSION: September 1, 2023
CONSULTANT: Mike Dayton / E.M. / (916) 319-3802 FN: 0001653
Date of Hearing: August 23, 2023
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Chris Holden, Chair
SBPCA Bill Id:SB 577
Author:(Hurtado) – As Introduced Ver:February 15, 2023
Policy Committee: | Emergency Management | Vote: | 6 - 0 |
|
| ||
|
|
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY:
This bill revises the authorization of the State Fire Marshal (SFM) to establish and collect fees associated with the California Fire Service Training and Education Program (Program) and California Fire and Arson Training Act (Act), authorizing the SFM to establish and collect such fees only to the extent that state appropriations and other funding sources are insufficient to cover the necessary costs of Program and Act activities.
FISCAL EFFECT:
- Cost pressures of an unknown, but potentially significant, amount to the state by limiting the authority of the SFM to collect specified fees only when state appropriations and other funding sources cannot cover the costs, thus signaling that such appropriations are a legislative priority. The Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) notes that the California State Fire Training (SFT) division within the SFM does not generally receive state budget appropriations, as the program is fully funded through user fees (General Fund).
- To the extent state funding is appropriated for this purpose, CAL FIRE estimates costs of an unknown amount, due to the unpredictable increase in system use. However, for illustrative purposes, CAL FIRE assumes that if SFT course fees are not charged, the CAL FIRE Training Center would experience a 30% to 50% increase in course requests and certification applications. CAL FIRE estimates such a workload increase would necessitate hiring three additional positions to assist with course scheduling and processing, certification issuance, instructor registration, and other curriculum-related duties, resulting in costs of approximately $469,000 in the first year and $463,000 annually thereafter. CAL FIRE also anticipates needing one additional pool vehicle to facilitate stakeholder engagement and expanding the number of licensed users for its records management system, resulting in costs of approximately $704,000 in the first year and $618,000 annually thereafter (California Fire and Arson Training Fund).
COMMENTS:
- Purpose. According to the author:
[T]his bill allows the [SFM] to accept additional funding sources for the [Program]. The bill would make the same change relative to the [Act]. Due to the enormous risk of fire and other disasters that face California, we must make State Fire Training an affordable solution for our paid and volunteer firefighters, as well as students wishing to enter the fire service.
This bill is co-sponsored by the California Fire Chiefs Association and the Fire Districts Association of California and supported by various local cities, fire departments, and fire districts.
- Fire Training Historically Supported by Participant Fees. The SFT division within the SFM establishes, develops, and delivers standardized training and education for the California fire service, with over 10,000 paid and volunteer firefighters participating in these programs every year. Although the Program originally began under the California Department of Education, the Program transferred to the SFM in 1978 to provide a self-supporting training infrastructure for California’s fire service paid for by participant fees. The SFT collects fees for services provided, including issuing course diplomas, applying for certification, taking certification exams, and accrediting training academies.
In September 2019, a sub-group of the Statewide Training and Education Advisory Committee (STEAC) was formed to update SFT fees based on historical system use. The sub-group’s proposed fees were then approved by the full STEAC and the State Board of Fire Service, before a rulemaking package went through the Office of Administrative Law process to be codified into the California Code of Regulations. The SFT implemented the fee adjustments in January 2021. This bill allows such fees to be collected only if state appropriations and other funding sources are insufficient to cover the necessary costs of Program and Act activities.
Analysis Prepared by: Irene Ho / APPR. / (916) 319-2081
Date of Hearing: July 10, 2023
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
Freddie Rodriguez, Chair
SBPCA Bill Id:SB 577
Author:(Hurtado) – As Introduced Ver:February 15, 2023
SENATE VOTE: 40-0
SUBJECT: California Fire Service Training and Education Program: California Fire and Arson Training Act: fees
SUMMARY: This bill limits the ability of the State Fire Marshal (SFM) to establish and collect admission and other fees associated with the California Fire Services Training and Education Program (Program) and the California Fire and Arson Training Act (Act) only to the extent that state appropriations and other funding sources are insufficient to cover the necessary associated costs. Specifically, this bill:
1) Authorizes the SFM to establish and collect admission fees and other fees only to the extent that state appropriations and other funding sources for those seminars, conferences, and specialized training are insufficient to cover the necessary costs of those seminars, conferences, and specialized training.
EXISTING LAW:
- Establishes the Program in the office of the SFM, and requires the SFM, with policy guidance and advice from the State Board of Fire Services (Board), to carry out the management of the Program.
- Authorizes the SFM to, among other things, establish and collect admission fees and other fees that may be necessary to be charged for seminars, conferences, and specialized training given, as specified.
- Authorizes the SFM to establish and collect fees to implement the Act, which requires the SFM to, among other things, establish and make recommendations related to minimum standards for fire protection personnel and fire personnel instructors, develop course curricula for arson, fire technology, and apprenticeship training, and promote the California Fire Academy System, as specified.
FISCAL EFFECT: The fiscal impact is unknown to the SFM, according to the Senate Appropriations Committee.
COMMENTS:
Purpose of the bill: According to the author, “this bill allows the State Fire Marshal to accept additional funding sources for the California Fire Service Training and Education Program. The bill would make the same change relative to the California Fire and Arson Training Act. Due to the enormous risk of fire and other disasters that face California, we must make State Fire Training an affordable solution for our paid and volunteer firefighters, as well as students wishing to enter the fire service.”
Equity Impact: According to the author, “When the State Fire Training (SFT) program was established in California, it relied on user fees to recover the cost of staff, course development and certification. Over the years the fire service has become more professional and certifications are now required for every position in the fire service. To generate enough revenue, fees needed to be raised by over 200% and in some cases 400%. This sharp rise in costs has resulted in courses and certification becoming unaffordable to volunteer firefighters and individuals seeking entry level positions.”
The author continues, “this bill aims to address the escalating costs of fire training programs, and ensure that individuals who were priced out of the fire service are afforded equitable opportunities. By mitigating the financial burden associated with fire training and certification, this bill seeks to foster accessibility to this field regardless of an individual’s financial situation.”
Background: In the era of climate change, the fire service is regularly responding to mass conflagration wildfires, and the need for well-trained fire personnel has never been greater. Central to achieving this goal is making SFT courses accessible and affordable to all fire personnel, especially the next generation of firefighters. SFT has historically provided these services at a minimal cost to its users. However, doing so in an increasingly complex and expanding fire protection arena has resulted in funding shortfalls, requiring a significant increase in their fees. According to the author, This bill would authorize SFM to establish and collect the admission fees and other fees associated with the CFSTEP, and to establish the fees to implement the California Fire and Arson Training Act, only to the extent that state appropriations and other funding sources are insufficient to cover the necessary costs of the activities eligible to be paid from those fees.
California State Fire Training (SFT): The SFT is a division within the Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM), which establishes, develops, and delivers standardized training and education for the California fire service. The SFT annually develops a curriculum development plan for courses to be updated or added to the CFSTES and CFSTEP. SFT curriculum is designed using the State Fire Training Curriculum Development Model. SFT is responsible for establishing the rules and regulations, course development, course delivery, and testing for over 75 courses and certificates. These courses are critical to training firefighters to provide state-of-the-art protection to everyone in need in the state. The program includes pre-servicing training through 60 accredited community colleges, accredited fire academies, and private vendors. Over 10,000 paid and volunteer firefighters participate in these programs every year. And these training programs are expanding to meet the reality of California, where wildfires, floods, and other disasters occur year-round.
Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM): OSFM’s mission is to protect life and property by developing and applying fire prevention engineering, education, and enforcement. The principal functions of OFSM are to foster, promote and develop ways and means of protecting life and property against fire and panic. OSFM achieves these functions through several major program elements, including engineering, education, enforcement, and the State Board of Fire Services (Board) support. The Board provides a forum for addressing fire protection and prevention issues of statewide concern; develops technical and performance standards for training of fire service personnel; accredits curriculum; establishes policy for the certification system for the California Fire Service; advises the SFM on the dissemination of regulations; and sits as an appeals board on the application of California State Fire Marshal regulations.
OSFM provides support through various fire safety responsibilities and building regulations (controlling substances, regulating hazardous liquid pipelines, reviewing regulations and building standards, and providing training and education). OSFM operates several different divisions (CFSTES, CFSTEP, California Fire Service Census, and California Fire Academy) that deal with statewide activities, such as code enforcement in state-owned buildings, setting standards for testing and listing of fire protection materials and equipment, arson and bomb investigation, and pipeline safety.
To successfully receive a California OSFM certification or to register as an Instructor or lead/skills evaluator position, the Fire Chief or authorized signatory signing the certification task book or experience letter must be listed in the SFT Authorized Chief database before the certification task book or experience letter can be approved.
Arguments in support: The California Fire Chiefs Association writes in support, “this bill is designed to provide a wider scope of sources to support funding for state fire service training and education. Specifically, the bill will allow the State Fire Marshal to accept funding beyond user fees both to assist those of limited means to enter fire training programs and to aid those seeking the expanded certification opportunities that now exist.”
The City of Oxnard Fire Department adds in support, “Oxnard Fire Department is working hard to implement and adopt standards set forth by the State Fire Marshal and we feel strongly this bill will continue to help provide first rate training standards for our personnel.”
Related legislation: AB 570 (Gallagher, 2023) would clarify that County Service Areas that exclusively provide fire protection services are eligible for Special District Fire Response Fund grants, as specified. (Pending in the Senate)
AB 609 (Papan, 2023) would require the Office of Wildfire Technology Research and Development to submit a report to the Legislature that assesses and evaluates new aerial firefighting technologies, as specified. (Pending in the Senate Committee on Governmental Organization)
Prior legislation: AB 662 (Rodriguez, Chapter 575, Statutes of 2022) among other things, required the SFM to establish additional training standards that include the criteria for curriculum content recommended by the Statewide Training and Education Advisory Committee involving peer-to-peer suicide prevention programming, as specified, and required the SFM to coordinate with Cal-JAC to develop and deliver curriculum, as specified.
SB 190 (Dodd, Chapter 404, Statutes of 2019) requires the SFM to develop a model defensible space program, as specified; required the SFM to develop and make available a Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Fire Safety Building Standards Compliance training; and, require the SFM to develop a WUI Products listing of products and construction assemblies that comply with the WUI Fire Safety building standards, as specified.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
Administrative Fire Services Section- North |
Anderson Valley Community Services District / Fire Department |
California Fire Chiefs Association |
California Special Districts Association |
City of Albany |
City of Hanford Fire Department |
City of Lodi Fire Department |
City of Oxnard Fire Department |
City of Pasadena |
City of Torrance - Fire Department |
Clovis Fire Department |
Cosumnes Fire Department |
El Dorado Hills Fire Department |
Fire Districts Association of California |
Lake Valley Fire Protection District |
Mccloud Fire Department |
Mendocino County Fire Investigation Unit |
North County Fire Authority |
Northshore Fire Protection District |
Novato Fire Protection District |
Orange County Fire Authority |
Palomar Community College District |
Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District |
Sierra College |
Sonoma County Fire Chiefs Association |
Sonoma County Fire District |
Sonoma Valley Fire District |
Opposition
None on file.
Analysis Prepared by: Mike Dayton / E.M. / (916) 319-3802
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE Office of Senate Floor Analyses (916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478 | SB 577 |
THIRD READING
Bill No: SB 577
Author: Hurtado (D)
Introduced: 2/15/23
Vote: 21
SENATE GOVERNMENTAL ORG. COMMITTEE: 14-0, 3/28/23
AYES: Dodd, Wilk, Alvarado-Gil, Ashby, Bradford, Glazer, Jones, Nguyen, Ochoa Bogh, Padilla, Portantino, Roth, Rubio, Seyarto
NO VOTE RECORDED: Archuleta
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 7-0, 5/18/23
AYES: Portantino, Jones, Ashby, Bradford, Seyarto, Wahab, Wiener
SUBJECT: California Fire Service Training and Education Program: California Fire and Arson Training Act: fees
SOURCE: California Fire Chiefs Association
Fire Districts Association of California
DIGEST:
This bill limits the ability of the State Fire Marshal (SFM) to establish and collect admission and other fees associated with the California Fire Services Training and Education Program (Program) and the California Fire and Arson Training Act (Act) only to the extent that state appropriations and other funding sources are insufficient to cover the necessary associated costs.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- Establishes the Program in the office of the SFM, and requires the SFM, with policy guidance and advice from the State Board of Fire Services (Board), to carry out the management of the Program.
- Authorizes the SFM to, among other things, establish and collect admission fees and other fees that may be necessary to be charged for seminars, conferences, and specialized training given, as specified.
- Authorizes the SFM to establish and collect fees to implement the Act, which requires the SFM to, among other things, establish and make recommendations related to minimum standards for fire protection personnel and fire personnel instructors, develop course curricula for arson, fire technology, and apprenticeship training, and promote the California Fire Academy System, as specified.
This bill authorizes the SFM to establish and collect admission fees and other fees only to the extent that state appropriations and other funding sources for those seminars, conferences, and specialized training are insufficient to cover the necessary costs of those seminars, conferences, and specialized training.
Background
Purpose of the bill. According to the author’s office, “the California Fire Service Training and Education) Division under the CAL FIRE – Office of the State Fire Marshal provides an essential need for a diverse California fire service. In the era of climate change, the fire service is regularly responding to mass conflagration wildfires and the need for well-trained fire personnel has never been greater. Central to achieving this goal is making State Fire Training courses both accessible and affordable to all fire personnel, especially the next generation of firefighters. Historically, State Fire Training has been able to provide these services at a minimal cost to its users. However, doing so in an increasingly complex and expanding arena of fire protection has resulted in funding shortfalls, requiring a significant increase in their fees.”
Office of the State Fire Marshal. The mission of the SFM is to protect life and property through the development and application of fire prevention engineering, education and enforcement. The SFM supports the mission of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal FIRE) by focusing on fire prevention. The Office of the State Fire Marshal provides support through a wide variety of fire safety responsibilities including: regulating buildings in which people live, congregate, or are confined; by controlling substances and products which may, in and of themselves, or by their misuse, cause injuries, death and destruction by fire; by providing statewide direction for fire prevention within wildland areas; by regulating hazardous liquid pipelines; by developing and reviewing regulations and building standards; and by providing training and education in fire protection methods and responsibilities.
These achievements are accomplished through several major program elements including engineering, education, enforcement and support from the State Board of Fire Services.
The California State Fire Training (SFT) is the division of the SFM that establishes, develops, and delivers standardized training and education for the California fire service. The SFT website serves as a resource and a one-stop shop for all things related to the SFT such as SFT approved classes open for enrollment, continuing education and topic-specific training course, training courses that lead to job function certification, records management systems, and access to accredited academies.
The SFT is responsible for establishing the rules and regulations, course development, course delivery and testing for over 75 different courses and certificates. These courses are critical to training firefighters to provide state-of-the art protection to everyone in need in the state. The program includes pre-servicing training through 60 accredited community colleges, accredited fire academies and private vendors. Over 10,000 paid and volunteer firefighters participate in these programs every year. And these training programs are expanding to meet the reality of California where wildfire, floods, and other disasters occur year-round.
State Board of Fire Services. The Board is an 18-member advisory board to the SFM. The Board is comprised of representatives of fire service labor, fire chiefs, fire districts, volunteer firefighters, city and county government, Office of Emergency Services, and the insurance industry. The Board is chaired by the SFM. The Board provides a forum for addressing fire protection and prevention issues of statewide concern; develops technical and performance standards for training of fire service personnel; accredits curriculum; establishes policy for the certification system for the California Fire Service; advises the SFM on dissemination of regulations; and sits as an appeals board on the application of SFM regulations.
California Firefighter Joint Apprenticeship Committee. The California Firefighter Joint Apprenticeship Committee (Cal-JAC) is a nationally recognized firefighter apprenticeship and training program co-sponsored by the SFM, representing management, and the California Professional Firefighters, AFL-CIO, representing labor. Cal-JAC, among other things, is responsible for the training, recruitment, and testing of potential firefighter candidates.
Cal-JAC emphasizes the value of recruiting well trained and qualified firefighting personnel from the ranks of underrepresented and target groups. The Cal-JAC provides outreach materials and services for recruitment to our participating departments.
This bill authorizes the SFM, only to the extent that state appropriations and other funding sources for seminars, conferences, and specialized training and for the purposes of implementing the Act are insufficient to cover the necessary costs of those seminars, conferences, and specialized training, or implementing the Act.
Supporters of the bill argue that this change will authorize the SFM to slow the growth of, limit, or reduce fees paid by aspiring Fire Service members when trying to break into the field. Additionally, supporters believe that this will allow for the SFM to utilize alternative sources of income to address the concerns of rising fees for continuing education in the Fire Service.
Related/Prior Legislation
SB 570 (Gallagher, 2023) clarifies that County Service Areas that exclusively provide fire protection services are eligible for Special District Fire Response Fund grants, as specified. (Pending in the Assembly Appropriations Committee)
AB 609 (Papan, 2023) requires the Office of Wildfire Technology Research and Development to submit a report to the Legislature that assesses and evaluates new aerial firefighting technologies, as specified. (Pending in the Assembly Appropriations Committee)
AB 662 (Rodriguez, Chapter 575, Statutes of 2022) among other things, required the SFM to establish additional training standards that include the criteria for curriculum content recommended by the Statewide Training and Education Advisory Committee involving peer-to-peer suicide prevention programming, as specified, and required the SFM to coordinate with Cal-JAC to develop and deliver curriculum, as specified.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No
According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, unknown fiscal impact to the SFM. This bill limits the SFM’s ability to collect training fees to the amount that is not covered by state appropriations or other funding sources. However, Cal FIRE notes that the California State Fire Training (SFT) division within the SFM does not generally receive state budget appropriations, as the program is fully funded through user fees.
While a fiscal impact from Cal FIRE was not available at the time of this analysis, there may be additional cost pressures to the SFM to the extent this bill decreases the ability of the SFT to recoup its actual administrative costs (California Fire and Arson Training Fund). New cost pressures may impact the SFT’s operating costs and future budget requests (General Fund).
SUPPORT: (Verified 5/18/23)
California Fire Chiefs Association (co-source)
Fire Districts Association of California (co-source)
Administrative Fire Services Section – North
Anderson Valley Community Services District/Fire Department
City of Albany
City of Clovis Fire Department
City of Hanford Fire Department
City of Lodi Fire Department
City of Oxnard Fire Department
City of Pasadena
City of Torrance Fire Department
Cosumnes Fire Department
El Dorado Hills Fire Department
Lake Valley Fire Protection District
McCloud Fire Department
Mendocino County Fire Investigation Unit
North County Fire Authority
Northshore Fire Protection District
Novato Fire Protection District
Orange County Fire Authority
Palomar Community College District
Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District
Sierra College
Sonoma County Fire Chiefs Association
Sonoma County Fire District
Sonoma Valley Fire District
OPPOSITION: (Verified 5/18/23)
None received
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The California Fire Chiefs Association and the Fire Districts Association of California jointly write that, “[c]urrently, State Fire Training is funded solely by student/user fees. These fees no longer provide a sufficient base when you consider they must fund expanded curriculum development, accreditation of fire training programs, oversight of instruction, maintaining instructors and student database and meetings and updating the requirements of the International Fire Service Accreditation Congress (IFSAC).”
Further, the sponsors note that, “SB 577 takes a critical step to addressing training funding by permitting the State Fire Marshal to receive sources of training funding from sources other than user fees. Various federal and state post disaster funding programs would now be eligible to be contributors to State Fire Training. These new sources of funding are needed to continue to build courses to prepare for the accelerating threats facing California while also providing incentives to expand the training opportunities for a culturally diverse population to apply for entry-level certification and testing to become Firefighters 1 and 2 Certifications.”
Prepared by: Brian Duke / G.O. / (916) 651-1530
5/20/23 13:00:27
**** END ****
SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Senator Anthony Portantino, Chair
2023 - 2024 Regular Session
SB 577 (Hurtado) - California Fire Service Training and Education Program: California Fire and Arson Training Act: fees
Version: February 15, 2023 | Policy Vote: G.O. 14 - 0 |
Urgency: No | Mandate: No |
Hearing Date: April 10, 2023 | Consultant: Janelle Miyashiro |
Bill Summary:
SB 577 limits how the State Fire Marshal (SFM) establishes and collects admission fees for seminars, conferences, and specialized trainings associated with the California Fire Services Training and Education Program and the California Fire and Arson Training Act, as specified.
Fiscal Impact:
Unknown fiscal impact to the SFM. This bill limits the SFM’s ability to collect training fees to the amount that is not covered by state appropriations or other funding sources. However, CAL FIRE notes that the California State Fire Training (SFT) division within the SFM does not generally receive state budget appropriations, as the program is fully funded through user fees.
While a fiscal impact from CAL FIRE was not available at the time of this analysis, there may be additional cost pressures to the SFM to the extent this bill decreases the ability of the SFT to recoup its actual administrative costs (California Fire and Arson Training Fund). New cost pressures may impact the SFT’s operating costs and future budget requests (General Fund).
Background:
The Office of the SFM provides support to CAL FIRE through a wide variety of fire safety responsibilities including: regulating buildings in which people live, congregate, or are confined; by controlling substances and products which may, in and of themselves, or by their misuse, cause injuries, death and destruction by fire; by providing statewide direction for fire prevention within wildland areas; by regulating hazardous liquid pipelines; by developing and reviewing regulations and building standards; and by providing training and education in fire protection methods and responsibilities.
In 1978, the California Department of Education transferred responsibility of California Fire Service Training and Education Program to the SFM. The SFT is the division of the SFM that establishes, develops, and delivers standardized training and education for the California fire service. The SFT oversees the California Fire Service Training and Education Program which consists of two main program elements: the California Fire Service Training and Education System (CFSTES) and the Fire Service Training and Education Program (FSTEP).
When the program transferred to the SFM, the legislative intent for establishing the California Fire and Arson Training Fund, was to provide a self-supporting training infrastructure for California’s fire service. Due to this, the SFT is a self-funded program that is paid for by participant’s fees. The SFT collects fees for services provided, including: course diplomas, applying for certification, taking certification exams, and Accredited Local Academy and Accredited Regional Training Programs accreditations.
In September 2019, the SFM updated its training and education fees based on historical system use. A sub-group of the Statewide Training and Education Advisory Committee (STEAC) was formed to set the proposed fees. The proposed fees then went to STEAC and the State Board of Fire Service for approval. After the approval, a rulemaking package went through the Office of Administrative Law process to be codified into the California Code of Regulations. The SFT implemented the fee adjustments in January 2021.
For comparison, the below table outlines original and recently adjusted fees for several SFT services. This information was taken from the SFT’s September 2019 Fee Report and 2019-20 Annual Report. Not all services are listed.
Service | Original Fee | New Fee | Percent Change |
Certification Fees | |||
Chief Fire Officer / Executive Chief Fire Officer | $90 | $150 | 67% |
Community Risk Educator | $65 | $100 | 54% |
Company Officer | $65 | $100 | 54% |
Emergency Vehicle Technician / Fire Mechanic | $65 | $100 | 54% |
Instructor | $65 | $100 | 54% |
Fire Marshal | $90 | $150 | 67% |
Course Delivery Fees | |||
CFSTES Diploma | $80 | $140 | 75% |
FSTEP Diploma | $20 | $75 | 275% |
Peer Assessment and Established Equivalency Fees | |||
PACE 2: Credential Evaluation (Instructors) | $60 | $200 | 233% |
PACE 3: Course Equivalencies | $60 | $200 | 233% |
Established Equivalencies | $60 | $140 | 133% |
Accredited Academy Fees | |||
Accredited Local Academy (ALA) / Accredited Regional Training Programs (ARTP) Initial Accreditation | $500 | $4,000 | 700% |
ALA / ARTP Reaccreditation | $500 | $3,000 | 500% |
Proposed Law:
Specifies the SFM may establish and collect admission fees and other fees necessary for seminars, conferences, and specialized trainings only to the extent that state appropriations and other funding sources are insufficient to cover the necessary cost of administering those seminars, conferences, and specialized trainings under the California Fire Services Training and Education Program and the California Fire and Arson Training Act.
-- END --
SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION
Senator Bill Dodd
Chair
2023 - 2024 Regular
Bill No: 577 Hearing Date: 3/28/2023
Author: | |||
Version: | 2/15/2023 Introduced | ||
Urgency: | No | Fiscal: | Yes |
Consultant: | Brian Duke | ||
SUBJECT: California Fire Service Training and Education Program: California Fire and Arson Training Act: fees
DIGEST: This bill limits the ability of the State Fire Marshal (SFM) to establish and collect admission and other fees associated with the California Fire Services Training and Education Program (Program) and the California Fire and Arson Training Act (Act) only to the extent that state appropriations and other funding sources are insufficient to cover the necessary associated costs.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
- Establishes the Program in the office of the SFM, and requires the SFM, with policy guidance and advice from the State Board of Fire Services (Board), to carry out the management of the Program.
- Authorizes the SFM to, among other things, establish and collect admission fees and other fees that may be necessary to be charged for seminars, conferences, and specialized training given, as specified.
- Authorizes the SFM to establish and collect fees to implement the Act, which requires the SFM to, among other things, establish and make recommendations related to minimum standards for fire protection personnel and fire personnel instructors, develop course curricula for arson, fire technology, and apprenticeship training, and promote the California Fire Academy System, as specified.
This bill authorizes the SFM to establish and collect admission fees and other fees only to the extent that state appropriations and other funding sources for those seminars, conferences, and specialized training are insufficient to cover the necessary costs of those seminars, conferences, and specialized training.
Background
Purpose of the Bill. According to the author’s office, “the California Fire Service Training and Education) Division under the CAL FIRE – Office of the State Fire Marshal provides an essential need for a diverse California fire service. In the era of climate change, the fire service is regularly responding to mass conflagration wildfires and the need for well-trained fire personnel has never been greater. Central to achieving this goal is making State Fire Training courses both accessible and affordable to all fire personnel, especially the next generation of firefighters. Historically, State Fire Training has been able to provide these services at a minimal cost to its users. However, doing so in an increasingly complex and expanding arena of fire protection has resulted in funding shortfalls, requiring a significant increase in their fees.”
Office of the State Fire Marshal. The mission of the SFM is to protect life and property through the development and application of fire prevention engineering, education and enforcement. The SFM supports the mission of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal FIRE) by focusing on fire prevention. The Office of the State Fire Marshal provides support through a wide variety of fire safety responsibilities including: regulating buildings in which people live, congregate, or are confined; by controlling substances and products which may, in and of themselves, or by their misuse, cause injuries, death and destruction by fire; by providing statewide direction for fire prevention within wildland areas; by regulating hazardous liquid pipelines; by developing and reviewing regulations and building standards; and by providing training and education in fire protection methods and responsibilities.
These achievements are accomplished through several major program elements including engineering, education, enforcement and support from the State Board of Fire Services.
The California State Fire Training (SFT) is the division of the SFM that establishes, develops, and delivers standardized training and education for the California fire service. The SFT website serves as a resource and a one-stop shop for all things related to the SFT such as SFT approved classes open for enrollment, continuing education and topic-specific training course, training courses that lead to job function certification, records management systems, and access to accredited academies.
State Board of Fire Services. The Board is an 18-member advisory board to the SFM. The Board is comprised of representatives of fire service labor, fire chiefs, fire districts, volunteer firefighters, city and county government, Office of Emergency Services, and the insurance industry. The Board is chaired by the SFM. The Board provides a forum for addressing fire protection and prevention issues of statewide concern; develops technical and performance standards for training of fire service personnel; accredits curriculum; establishes policy for the certification system for the California Fire Service; advises the SFM on dissemination of regulations; and sits as an appeals board on the application of SFM regulations.
California Firefighter Joint Apprenticeship Committee. The California Firefighter Joint Apprenticeship Committee (Cal-JAC) is a nationally recognized firefighter apprenticeship and training program co-sponsored by the SFM, representing management, and the California Professional Firefighters, AFL-CIO, representing labor. Cal-JAC, among other things, is responsible for the training, recruitment, and testing of potential firefighter candidates.
Cal-JAC emphasizes the value of recruiting well trained and qualified firefighting personnel from the ranks of underrepresented and target groups. The Cal-JAC provides outreach materials and services for recruitment to our participating departments.
This bill authorizes the SFM, only to the extent that state appropriations and other funding sources for seminars, conferences, and specialized training and for the purposes of implementing the Act are insufficient to cover the necessary costs of those seminars, conferences, and specialized training, or implementing the Act.
Supporters of the bill argue that this change will authorize the SFM to slow the growth of, limit, or reduce fees paid by aspiring Fire Service members when trying to break into the field. Additionally, supporters believe that this will allow for the SFM to utilize alternative sources of income to address the concerns of rising fees for continuing education in the Fire Service.
Prior/Related Legislation
SB 570 (Gallagher, 2023) would clarify that County Service Areas that exclusively provide fire protection services are eligible for Special District Fire Response Fund grants, as specified. (Pending in the Assembly Appropriations Committee)
AB 609 (Papa, 2023) would require the Office of Wildfire Technology Research and Development to submit a report to the Legislature that assesses and evaluates new aerial firefighting technologies, as specified. (Pending in the Assembly Appropriations Committee)
AB 662 (Rodriguez, Chapter 575, Statutes of 2022) among other things, required the SFM to establish additional training standards that include the criteria for curriculum content recommended by the Statewide Training and Education Advisory Committee involving peer-to-peer suicide prevention programming, as specified, and required the SFM to coordinate with Cal-JAC to develop and deliver curriculum, as specified.
SB 190 (Dodd, Chapter 404, Statutes of 2019) requires the SFM to develop a model defensible space program, as specified; required the SFM to develop and make available a Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Fire Safety Building Standards Compliance training; and, require the SFM to develop a WUI Products listing of products and construction assemblies that comply with the WUI Fire Safety building standards, as specified.
AB 579 (Flora, Chapter 344, Statutes of 2017) required the Division of Apprenticeship Standards, in collaboration with Cal-JAC, to develop a statewide firefighter pre-apprenticeship program designed to recruit candidates from underrepresented groups, as specified.
AB 398 (Morrell, Chapter 215, Statutes of 2011) authorized the SFM to accept certification by the United States Department of Defense as a firefighter, as specified, as an alternative for the fire protection personnel training and certification standards for the position of Firefighter I established by the SFM.
SB 156 (Soto, Chapter 803, Statutes of 2006) required the SFM to contract with Cal-JAC to develop curriculum criteria based on the recommendations made by the Emergency Response Training Advisory Committee, including training firefighters in their responsibilities as first responders to terrorism incidents.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: Fiscal Com.: Local:
SUPPORT:
California Fire Chiefs Association (Co-source)
Fire Districts Association of California (Co-source)
Albany Fire Department
Clovis Fire Department
Hanford Fire Department
Mendocino County Fire Investigation Unit
McCloud Fire Department
North County Fire Authority
Novato Fire Protection District
Oxnard Fire Department
Pasadena Fire Department
Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District
Sonoma County Fire Chiefs Association
Sonoma Valley Fire District
Ukiah Valley Fire Authority
OPPOSITION:
None received
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: Sponsors of the bill write that the “California Fire Service Training and Education Program (SFT), overseen by the State Fire Marshals Office, is responsible for establishing the rules and regulations, course development, course delivery and testing for over 75 different courses and certificates. These courses are critical to training firefighters to provide state-of-the art protection to everyone in need in our state. The program includes pre-service training through 60 accredited community colleges, accredited fire academies and private vendors. Over 10,000 paid and volunteer firefighters participate in these programs every year. And these training programs are expanding to meet the reality of California where wildfire, floods and other disasters occur year-round.”
Further, the sponsors state that currently, “State Fire Training is funded solely by student/user fees. These fees no longer provide a sufficient base when you consider they must fund expanded curriculum development, accreditation of fire training programs, oversight of instruction, maintaining instructors and student database and meeting and updating the requirements of the International Fire Service Accreditation Congress (IFSAC). SB 577 takes a critical step to addressing training funding by permitting the State Fire Marshal to receive sources of training funding from sources other than user fees. Various federal and state post disaster funding programs would now be eligible to be contributors to State Fire Training. These new sources of funding are needed to continue to build courses to prepare for the accelerating threats facing California while also providing incentives to expand the training opportunities for a culturally diverse population to apply for entry-level certification and testing to become Firefighters 1 and 2 Certifications.”
Discussed in Hearing
View Older HearingsBill Author
Bill Co-Author(s):